Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2020-01-23 Work Session
Page Kodiak Island Borough Assembly Work Session Thursday, January 23, 2020, 6:30 p.m. School District Conference Room Work Sessions are informal meetings of the Assembly where Assembly members review the upcoming regular meeting agenda packet and seek or receive information from staff. Although additional items not listed on the work session agenda are discussed when introduced by the Mayor, Assembly, or staff, no formal action is taken at work sessions and items that require formal Assembly action are placed on regular Assembly meeting agenda. Citizen's comments at work sessions are NOT considered part of the official record. Citizen's comments intended for the "official record" should be made at a regular Assembly meeting. 1. CITIZENS' COMMENTS (Limited to Three Minutes per Speaker) 2. AGENDA ITEMS 3-20 a. Alaska Aerospace/Pacific Spaceport Update AAC Update - Kodiak Borough Assembly 21 -23 b. Consolidation Committee Update Consolidation Committee Recommendations - Pdf 24-57 C. City of Kodiak Annexation Discussion Overview Output Document (AS - 1107) - Pdf d. UMOT - Continued Discussion 58-60 e. Roll Cart Example And Demonstration Bear Lid Label 3. MANAGER COMMENTS 4. CLERK'S COMMENTS 5. PACKET REVIEW Items may be added during the work session for inclusion on the Regular Meeting agenda. The item title needs to be provided/developed at the work session in enough detail to give assembly and public reasonable notice. AWARDS AND PRESENTATIONS Proclamations - Teen Dating Violence Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR)/Audit Presentation - Grant Todd, CPA, Altman, Rogers & Co, Borough Auditors Visit our website at91 www.facebook.com/Kodiakislandborough Q@KodiakBorough www.kodiakak.us Page 1 of 60 PUBLIC HEARING Ordinance No. FY2020-01 B Amending Ordinance No. FY2020-01, Fiscal Year 2020 Budget, By Amending Budgets To Account For The Governor's 50% Funding Cut to the State Aid For Costs of School Construction Debt Program. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Ordinance FY2020-15 Amending Title 3 Revenue And Finance Chapter 3.10.030 Permissible Investments And Chapter 3.10.120 Facilities Fund NEW BUSINESS CONTRACTS RESOLUTIONS *Resolution No. FY2020-19 Safeguarding Alaska's Oil Spill Prevention And Response Standards ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION Ordinance No. FY2020-09 An ordinance of the Assembly of the Kodiak Island Borough amending Titles 1, 6, 8, 9, 10, 13, 16, 17 and 18 of the Borough code to clarify and make consistent language relating to code enforcement. OTHER ITEMS *Letter of Support Prince William Sound Regional Citizens' Advisory Council (PWSRCAC) EXECUTIVE SESSION 6. ASSEMBLY MEMBERS COMMENTS 7. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Visit our website at93 www.facebook.com/Kodiakislandborough @KodiakBorough www.kodiakak.us Page 2 of 60 AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . a . Al a s k a A e r o s p a c e / P a c i f i c S p a c e p o r t U p d a t e Pa g e 3 o f 6 0 AAC VALUES Safety First Respect the Environment Collaborate with the Community Provide Value to our Customers Financially Sustainable Built upon Ethics, Transparency, and Respect 2 AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . a . Al a s k a A e r o s p a c e / P a c i f i c S p a c e p o r t U p d a t e Pa g e 4 o f 6 0 AAC REVENUE AND ALASKA-BASED EXPENSE HISTORY 3 AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . a . Al a s k a A e r o s p a c e / P a c i f i c S p a c e p o r t U p d a t e Pa g e 5 o f 6 0 AAC LAUNCH HISTORY 4 AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . a . Al a s k a A e r o s p a c e / P a c i f i c S p a c e p o r t U p d a t e Pa g e 6 o f 6 0 AAC LAUNCH HISTORY AND PROJECTED GROWTH 5 AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . a . Al a s k a A e r o s p a c e / P a c i f i c S p a c e p o r t U p d a t e Pa g e 7 o f 6 0 LAUNCH SUPPORT FOR ROCKET LAB USA •Range Safety & Telemetry System (RSTS) Support •Mahia peninsula, New Zealand •AAC has supported all RocketLab launches; May 2017 –present •Provides value back to Alaska •Alaskans supporting beyond strengthens State’s market position •Developing valuable experience in emerging light-lift market 6 AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . a . Al a s k a A e r o s p a c e / P a c i f i c S p a c e p o r t U p d a t e Pa g e 8 o f 6 0 OPPORTUNITIES & CHALLENGES •Opportunities •Increase diversity of PSCA launch customers •US Space Force reinforces need for access to space •Growing commercial launch interest •Export AAC’s expertise and capabilities •Range services and equipment to private spaceports •Range expertise to non-PSCA government operations •Vertically integrate Alaska-based space capabilities •Poker Flat Research Range, small satellite development, manufacturing, downlink and mission processing •Challenges •Eliminating myths that Alaska is tough place to work •Weather, qualified workforce, logistics, costs •Maintaining steady flow of launch events •Uncertainties in government missions •Pace and growth of the light-lift / cube-sat industry •Federal, other State, and international competition 7 AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . a . Al a s k a A e r o s p a c e / P a c i f i c S p a c e p o r t U p d a t e Pa g e 9 o f 6 0 LAUNCH SUPPORT OUTLOOK •Increased diversity in Kodiak launch customers •Transition from one government customer (e.g., USAF, MDA) to current mix of six commercial and government customers •Less vulnerable to launch and program delays •Adding multi-year agreements •Support to other locations •Exploring Poker Flat Research Range support •Interest from other FAA-licensed spaceports •Growing interest from space community •New commercial companies •Expanded US Government interest Annual Launch Pace Goal:1-3 government missions +2 commercial customers launching monthly Combination of govt vs commercial may change based on market needs 8 AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . a . Al a s k a A e r o s p a c e / P a c i f i c S p a c e p o r t U p d a t e Pa g e 1 0 o f 6 0 SAFETY-RELATED ENHANCEMENTS •Modernized Command Destruct System (CDS) •Decouples telemetry and Command Destruct antennas •Allows for more efficient support of newer launch vehicles and mitigates risk due to part obsolesce •Flight Analysis Workstation (FAWS) •Positions site to support light-lift vehicles with autonomous flight termination systems (AFTS) •More capable Surveillance Radar •Radar’s range and sensitivity was increased by 40% •AIS receiver added for ship tracking and identification •ADS-B receiver added for aircraft tracking and identification •Allows range to better manage safety zones •Space Data Integrator (SDI) •Provides FAA Air Traffic Control with real-time launch data •First spaceport selected to implement capability 9 AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . a . Al a s k a A e r o s p a c e / P a c i f i c S p a c e p o r t U p d a t e Pa g e 1 1 o f 6 0 IMPROVING WEATHER ANALYSIS FOR SHORTER CLOSURES •New commercial weather radar provides higher fidelity of atmospheric conditions for launch •Measure of thick cloud to assess risk of triggered lightning •Detailed insight into local weather conditions •Placement on far-side of Instrumentation Field •Location vetted by Spaceport Planning Advisory Group (SPAG) •Minimal visual impact for Narrow Cape visitors •Initial scans show interference from trees •Further assessing operational impact •Anticipate removing select trees Suspected tree shadow Suspected tree shadow 10 AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . a . Al a s k a A e r o s p a c e / P a c i f i c S p a c e p o r t U p d a t e Pa g e 1 2 o f 6 0 •Three launch pads capable of supporting solid, liquid, and hybrid launch vehicles •Launch Pad 2 (LP2): Legacy launch pad and retrofitted for liquid vehicles –multi-use •Pad C: Existing gravel launch site retrofitted with concrete and berms –preferred users •Pad B: Newest pad in Area 3 for light-lift launch vehicles –committed multi-year user •Multiple launch sites allow simultaneous preparation and more regular launch cadence •Target launch cadence for commercial vehicles is 24/year (two companies launching each once/month) PSCA ORBITAL LIGHT-LIFT LAUNCH PADS Pad BPad CLP2 11 AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . a . Al a s k a A e r o s p a c e / P a c i f i c S p a c e p o r t U p d a t e Pa g e 1 3 o f 6 0 EXPANDED MISSION COMMAND & CONTROL (EMC2) •Projected simultaneous needs informed decision to maintain capacity •Essentially mimics capabilities in the RCC •Allows PSCA to simultaneously prepare for multiple launches •Small trailers allow commercial customers to operate their vehicles •Conference room and large mission control room supports larger missions •Located behind the fenced area between the Range Control Center (RCC) and Maintenance & Support Facility (MSF) 12 AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . a . Al a s k a A e r o s p a c e / P a c i f i c S p a c e p o r t U p d a t e Pa g e 1 4 o f 6 0 NOMINAL LIGHT-LIFT LAUNCH SPLASHDOWN EVENTS •Sun-synchronous 500km orbit insertion trajectory shown •All light-lift class vehicles will have similar separation events •Initial analysis shows 1st Stage splashdown beyond trawler fishing areas 13 AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . a . Al a s k a A e r o s p a c e / P a c i f i c S p a c e p o r t U p d a t e Pa g e 1 5 o f 6 0 MANAGING SAFETY ZONE CLOSURES •Continued focus on setting launch windows that avoid other competing area needs •Focus on primary launch days on weekdays •Shift launch times to off-hours (e.g., evenings/nights) •Continue long-range planning to deconflict competing needs –air taxis, fishing openers/closures •May not be feasible to avoid all of these constraints •No more than 3-days in countdown –must take a safety down day •Collaborating with Safety Analysts on refining hazard zone modeling for Kodiak •Debris predictions are heavily influenced by wind data as well as aircraft type •Working with FAA on improved management of Temporary Flight Restrictions (TFRs) •Initial discussions with Anchorage Center Air Traffic Control on TFR implementation •Conducted spaceport orientation for ATC personnel at Anchorage Center •Additional management capability with improved surveillance radar and boundary boats 14 AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . a . Al a s k a A e r o s p a c e / P a c i f i c S p a c e p o r t U p d a t e Pa g e 1 6 o f 6 0 WATER SAFETY ZONE AREA (FINAL DRAFT) •~12nmi x 75nmi corridor •Opens to ~126nmi box •Boundary boats off narrow cape (yellow diamonds: approx. on-station locations) 15 AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . a . Al a s k a A e r o s p a c e / P a c i f i c S p a c e p o r t U p d a t e Pa g e 1 7 o f 6 0 AVIATION SAFETY ZONE (FINAL DRAFT) •Updated flight safety analysis (white outline) •Opens “S turns” and Saltry pass for air taxi service between Kodak and Old Harbor / Akhiok •Continuing to work with FAA and vehicle operator to make safety zone smaller •Aim is to keep Summit/Miam pass open •Day-of-launch operations coordination continues to be important •Communicate launch scrubs and revised end of window to release TFR 16 AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . a . Al a s k a A e r o s p a c e / P a c i f i c S p a c e p o r t U p d a t e Pa g e 1 8 o f 6 0 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT & OUTREACH •6 public meetings/presentations held on Kodiak in 2019 •Spaceport Master Plan in-work •Held two Public Informational Meetings: 25June19 and 22Jan20 •Expect Master Plan to be complete in late summer 2020 •STEM EduKits for K-8 and 9-12 grades •Kits are in final prep for use by clubs and teachers in Anchorage and Kodiak •Basics of rocket principals –several hands-on activities •Workforce development –focus on Kodiak and Alaska •Developing Launch Operations curriculum to facilitate workforce growth •Exploring establishing an Occupational Endorsement or Certificate program with Univ of Alaska 17 AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . a . Al a s k a A e r o s p a c e / P a c i f i c S p a c e p o r t U p d a t e Pa g e 1 9 o f 6 0 PROCUREMENT OPPORTUNITIES •IT Services •RFP is released; Proposals due 14 Feb 2020 •Boundary Boat Support •Need affordable boundary boat support for upcoming launch missions •Boats provide an effective method to ensure the water safety hazard areas are clear •RFP is released; Proposals due 31 Jan 2020 •Transportation Services •Secure storage of delivered packages and notification of PSCA personnel •Occasional delivery of packages to the spaceport •RFP is released; Proposals due 14 Jan 2020 •Architecture & Engineering Support •5-year IDIQ •RFP expected in Spring 2020 •PSCA Civil Construction Services •5-year IDIQ •RFP expected in Spring 2020 •Website Design and Management •RFP expected in Spring 2020 Opportunities posted on AAC website: http://akaerospace.com/about/contracting-overview/contracting-opportunities 18 AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . a . Al a s k a A e r o s p a c e / P a c i f i c S p a c e p o r t U p d a t e Pa g e 2 0 o f 6 0 AGENDA ITEM #2.b. KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH STAFF REPORT JANUARY 23, 2020 ASSEMBLY WORK SESSION SUBJECT: Consolidation Committee Update ORIGINATOR: Meagan Christiansen RECOMMENDATION: DISCUSSION: The Consolidation Committee has reviewed the powers and services of the City of Kodiak and Kodiak Island Borough and developed recommendations regarding powers and services of a new consolidated government. ALTERNATIVES: FISCAL IMPACT: OTHER INFORMATION: Kodiak Island Borough Consolidation Committee Update Page 21 of 60 AGENDA ITEM #2.b. Kodiak Island Borough CONSOLIDATION COMMITTEE Recommendations CONSOLIDATION IS THE DISSOLUTION OF TWO OR MORE LOCAL GOVERNMENTS WHICH THEN ARE COMBINED TO FORM A NEW SINGLE LOCAL GOVERNMENT The Consolidation Committee is charged with investigating what a new consolidated government would look like for Kodiak. The following are recommendations made by the Consolidation Committee; some of these recommendations are tentative pending further discussion and consideration, and all are subject to change at the discretion of the committee or direction of the Assembly. ❖ The consolidated government will not include the village communities; they will remain autonomous as they currently are. ❖ The consolidated government will be a Home Rule Borough. ❖ The reasons for consolidation are as follows: o to provide maximum self -governance with minimum governmental units o to provide services in a streamlined and equitable manner o to provide effective representation ❖ The Assembly composition of seven members will be as follows: 0 2 seats elected from the area currently known as Fire Protection Area No. 1 0 2 seats elected from the area currently known as the City of Kodiak 0 1 seat elected from the area generally south of the area currently known as the City of Kodiak, which include neighborhoods of the US Coast Guard Base, Bells Flats, Anton Larsen Bay, Chiniak, Pasagshak and residents in-between 0 1 seat elected from the rural/village communities 0 1 seat elected at -large And, assuming a Mayor -Manager form of government, the Mayor will be elected at -large. ❖ The new home rule borough will be named the Municipality of Kodiak ❖ All current borough area -wide powers will be maintained, and all current borough non - area -wide powers plus the current city powers and any powers not otherwise prohibited become adopted for the new home rule borough, Municipality of Kodiak. ❖ Water & Sewer services will be provided in the area of the current infrastructure and will be paid by user fees; future expansion will be possible and determined under the new consolidated government. Page 22 of 60 Consolidation Committee Update AGENDA ITEM #2.b. ❖ Animal Control Services will be provided along the road system and paid for via a non- areawide property tax and user fees. ❖ Parks & Recreation powers will be provided in the area of the road system, excluding the Anton Larsen Bay Dock which will move to Ports & Harbor services, to be paid for via non-areawide property taxes and user fees. ❖ Solid Waste powers will remain as they currently are; public services may change as the contract with waste collectors change. ❖ Port and Harbor services will be provided as a borough wide power/service, excluding the facilities owned by the island's 2nd class cities and tribal governments (the new borough will not take over village community harbors), and services will be paid for by an areawide tax such as severance tax plus user fees. ❖ Maintain Public Safety/Law Enforcement in its current form. ❖ The consolidated government will provide road maintenance services throughout the road system utilizing an internal public works department, with the ability to subcontract work as needed, paid for via property and sales tax. ❖ The consolidated government will have a centrally administered fire department that will provide fire and EMS response to the road system with a blended workforce of paid and volunteer workers, paid for with area -wide taxes such as property tax and sales tax, and user fees. ❖ The Building Inspection Department will be maintained and paid for with area -wide funding plus userfees. ❖ Library services will continue and be paid through the general fund and supplemented by user fees. ❖ The two airport facilities should be maintained and supported by user fees and area -wide taxes. ❖ Adopt areawide health powers ❖ Tourism will be an areawide service ❖ Economic Development will be maintained on an areawide basis ❖ The consolidated government will provide disaster preparedness on an areawide basis. Page 23 of 60 Consolidation Committee Update AGENDA ITEM #2.c. KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH STAFF REPORT JANUARY 23, 2020 ASSEMBLY WORK SESSION SUBJECT: City of Kodiak Annexation Discussion Overview ORIGINATOR: Meagan Christiansen RECOMMENDATION: DISCUSSION: The Assembly requested that staff research recent City Council discussions of annexation. The attached information summarizes and shares the information documented in City Council discussions during the past three years. ALTERNATIVES: n/a FISCAL IMPACT: not known at this time OTHER INFORMATION: n/a Kodiak Island Borough City of Kodiak Annexation Discussion Overview Page 24 of 60 AGENDA ITEM #2.c. City of Kodiak Annexation Definition: Annexation is expanding the city boundaries and extending city services to properties within the expanded boundaries. Recent City Council Discussions: 09/06/2016 Discussion about Annexation. Audio not available*, no documentation in packet. 01/14/2017 Review Historical Annexation Documents. Audio not available; packet included historical timeline of annexation related issues. 09/12/2017 Budget/Annexation Discussion. Audio not available; Packet included introduction of Annexation South and Annexation North proposals. Of note is that the calculation of potential city revenue from Annexation North is incorrect (high), however this info is preliminary and will be fleshed out further in the process. 11/07/2017 Annexation Update. Audio not available; packet included information about EMS, Police, Public Works related to potential annexation of current (Road) Service Area No. 1. 03/20/2018 Annexation Update. Discussion regarding Annexation South, specific to Natives of Kodiak. NoK has no opposition to annexation and has requested waterline extension to their property, at NoK expense. City Manager acknowledges that annexation would require extended police and fire protection, and there would also be expense related to water provision should the waterline extension project see completion. Further discussion about possible sewer service, and extension of base services. 04/10/2018 Natives of Kodiak presentation about water line extension plus request for temporary property tax waiver should annexation occur; followed by council discussion 08/07/2018 Natives of Kodiak Waterline Extension update; discussion of water line, but not as it relates to annexation; need for MOA, cost of operating, signature of state permit. 09/24/2019 Annexation update. Packet included the State of Alaska Local Boundary Commission guide for annexation in Alaska, which can be found at https://www.commerce.alaska.gov/web/Portals/4/pub/LBC/12 6 17%20City%20Annex ation%201 nformation%20Packet%20fi na I. pdf?ver=2018-01-11-135539-963 Discussion included review of Annexation South and Annexation North proposals, expansion of services; desire for a public and transparent process; need for timeframe, public education and feedback, financial analysis 10/08/2019 Annexation update. Packet included a draft White Paper with potential Frequently Asked Questions. *Audio not available means that it was not available via the City of Kodiak website; it was not requested via the City Clerk's office. Page 25 of 60 City of Kodiak Annexation Discussion Overview AGENDA ITEM #2.c. Discussion: what is the purpose of annexation? Do we require immediate fiscal cost effectiveness? What will expansion of services look like? General discussion about purpose: Natural response to growth, City already provides water and sewer to the proposed north annexation and maintains a mutual aid agreement with Fire Protection Area No. 1 (Bayside Fire Station) to provide ambulance service and additional fire response as needed; annexation would enfranchise voters near the existing boundaries who already receive the benefit of these services but cannot vote on City issues. Outreach is needed! 10/22/2019 Annexation update. Packet included an updated draft white paper on annexation, with frequently asked questions and answers. Increasing demand and need for public services; City would strive to provide the same level of service to the newly annexed area; repeated need for developing cost information, public information and education; new boundary definition, discussions with Borough Service Area boards regarding road and fire service. Acknowledgement that cost will probably be higher than increased revenue but there will be a quality of life benefit not measurable in those numbers. According to the Local Boundary Commission there are various means of accomplishing annexation. Discussion of the City Council seem to lean toward the following: Annexation South may be best accomplished by Annexation upon Unanimous Consent of Owners and Voters, which may occur upon adoption of an ordinance and submission of a petition, since there are only a few property owners in the proposed area of annexation. Annexation North would be best served by Annexation by Vote. Should a petition for annexation be approved by the Local Boundary Commission, then the question is placed on the ballot. A majority of voters in the territory proposed for annexation and a majority of voters in the annexing city must approve the ballot measure for it to pass. Page 26 of 60 City of Kodiak Annexation Discussion Overview AGENDA ITEM #2.c. City of Kodiak Annexation Timeline 19505 • Ordinance No. 204; An ordinance providing for the fixing of time for the area known as the Mission Road Area to become part of the City of Kodiak. Ordinance No. 204 approved March 12, 1956. 1960s • Ordinance No. 282; Untitled. Re: Air Park Subdivision No. One. Ordinance No. 282 effective January 1, 1966. • Ordinance No. 290; Untitled. Re: Portion of U.S. Survey No. 1396. Ordinance No. 290 effective August 27, 1966. • Ordinance No. 307; An ordinance of the City of Kodiak annexing adjoining contiguous property into the city and setting an effective date. Re: Beginning at Corner 7 of Extension of USS No. 2538B identical with Corner 4 of USS No. 1396. Ordinance No. 307 effective October 18, 1967. • Ordinance No. 311; An ordinance of the City of Kodiak annexing adjoining contiguous property into the city and setting an effective date. Re: Lots Twenty-eight (28), Twenty-nine A (29-A) and Twenty-nine B (29-B) of U.S. Survey No. 3098. Ordinance No. 311 effective December 9, 1967. • Ordinance No. 313; An ordinance of the City of Kodiak annexing adjoining contiguous property into the city and setting an effective date. Re: Tracts R, Q, A and B1 of U.S. Survey No. 3218 and units one (1) through four (4) of the Kadiak Alaska subdivision lying and being within U.S. Survey No. 3469. Ordinance No. 313 passed February 11, 1968. • Ordinance No. 319; An ordinance calling for an annexation election and setting a date therefor. • Ordinance No. 325; An ordinance amending Ordinance No. 319 by changing the date of the date of the special election called therein. Ordinance No. 325 passed August 25, 1968. 1970s • Ordinance No. 339; Untitled. Re: Tract B-2 and Tract C, U.S. Survey No. 3218. Ordinance No. 339 effective January 29, 1970. • Ordinance No. 361; An ordinance of the City of Kodiak annexing adjoining contiguous property into the city and setting an effective date. Re: Tracts D, E, G, H, all situate within U.S. Survey No. 3218. Ordinance No. 361 effective October 9, 1971. • Ordinance No. 384; An ordinance of the City of Kodiak annexing adjoining contiguous property owned by the city into the City of Kodiak and setting and effective date. Re: Beginning at M.C. 6, U.S. Survey No. 2873, identical with M.C. 1, U.S. Survey No. 3066. Ordinance No. 384 effective August 30, 1973. • Ordinance No. 401; An ordinance of the City of Kodiak annexing adjoining contiguous property into the city and setting an effective date. Re: Lots Twenty-six (26) A, Twenty-six (26) B, Twenty- six C, and Twenty-six (26) D, of the subdivision of Lot Twenty-six of the Mill Bay Road group of the land embraced on USS No. 3098. Ordinance No. 401 second reading on February 14, 1974. 11 Page 27 of 60 City of Kodiak Annexation Discussion Overview AGENDA ITEM #2.c. City of Kodiak Annexation Timeline • Ordinance No. 402; An ordinance of the City of Kodiak annexing adjoining contiguous property into the city and setting an effective date. Re: Lots Sixteen (16) B, and Sixteen (16) C, of the subdivision of Lot Sixteen (16) of the Mill Bay Road group of land embraced on USS No. 3098. Ordinance No. 402 second reading on February 14, 1974. • Ordinance No. 419; An ordinance of the City of Kodiak annexing adjoining contiguous property into the city and setting an effective date. Re: Lot Twenty-five (25) of U.S. Survey No. 3098. Ordinance No. 419 second reading on June 27, 1974. • Ordinance No. 434; An ordinance of the Common Council of the City of Kodiak annexing adjoining contiguous property into the city and setting and effective date. Re: Lots 7-16 of U.S. Survey No. 2537-B, of the original Townsite of Kodiak. Ordinance No. 434 effective April 19, 1975. • Ordinance No. 454; An ordinance of the City of Kodiak annexing adjoining contiguous property into the city and setting and effective date. Re: Lot 24, U.S.S. 3098. Ordinance No. 454 effective February 12, 1976. • Ordinance No. 456; An ordinance of the City of Kodiak annexing adjoining contiguous property to the city and setting an effective date. Re: Beginning at Corner Two (2) U.S. Survey No. 2537 B identical with Corner Fifteen (15) U.S. Survey No. 3945. Containing 193.6 acres more or less. Ordinance No. 456 effective April 22, 1976. • Ordinance No. 493; An ordinance of the Council of the City of Kodiak annexing adjoining contiguous property into the city and setting an effective date. Re: Beginning at Corner 1 M.C. of USS 2537-B Tract A, said corner being the True Point of Beginning. Containing 38.6 acres more or less. Ordinance No. 493 effective June 91 1977. • Ordinance No. 502; An ordinance of the City of Kodiak annexing adjoining contiguous property into the city and setting and effective date. Re: Lot 1, Block 1 of U.S. Survey 3066-B. Ordinance No. 502 effective August 30, 1977. • Ordinance No. 509; An ordinance of the Council of the City of Kodiak annexing adjoining contiguous property into the city and setting and effective date. Re: Lot three (3) of U.S. Survey 3467 containing 7.65 acres more or less and a portion of U.S. Survey 3469 described as follows under parcels A and B. Ordinance No. 509 effective October 13, 1978. • Ordinance No. 510; An ordinance of the City of Kodiak annexing adjoining contiguous property into the city and setting and effective date. Re: Lot 1, Block 1 of U.S. Survey 1822. Ordinance No. 510 effective October 13, 1978. • Ordinance No. 531; An ordinance of the City of Kodiak annexing adjoining contiguous property into the city and setting an effective date. Re: Lot 17A, USS 3098. Ordinance No. 531 effective October 13, 1978. • Ordinance No. 532; An ordinance of the City of Kodiak annexing adjoining contiguous property into the city and setting an effective date. Re: Lot 14A, USS 3098. Ordinance No. 532 effective October 13, 1978. 12 Page 28 of 60 City of Kodiak Annexation Discussion Overview AGENDA ITEM #2.c. City of Kodiak Annexation Timeline • Ordinance No. 552; An ordinance of the City of Kodiak annexing adjoining contiguous property into the city and setting an effective date. Re: Lots 17B, 18, and 19, USS 3098. Ordinance No. 552 effective July 30, 1979. • Ordinance No. 553; An ordinance of the City of Kodiak annexing adjoining contiguous property into the city and setting an effective date. Re: Lot 2A, USS 3098. Ordinance No. 553 effective July 30, 1979. • Ordinance No. 554; An ordinance of the Council of the City of Kodiak annexing adjoining contiguous property into the city and setting an effective date. Re: Lot one (1) embraced in the U.S. Survey 3098 located in township twenty seven (27 South, Range Nineteen (19) West, Seward Meridian, containing .17 acres more or less. Ordinance No. 554 effective July 30, 1979. 1980s • Ordinance No. 586; An ordinance of the City of Kodiak annexing adjoining contiguous property into the city and setting an effective date. Annexation of USS 3218, Tract S-2. Ordinance No. 586 effective on August 27, 1980. • Failed Ordinance No. 597; An ordinance of the City of Kodiak annexing adjoining contiguous property into the city and setting and effective date. Re: Tract B and E of Kadiak Alaska subdivision. Ordinance No. 597 failed on April 1, 1981. • Failed Ordinance No. 598; An ordinance of the Council of the City of Kodiak annexing adjoining contiguous property into the city and setting an effective date. Re: Tract F in Unit 5 of the Kadiak Alaska subdivision. Ordinance No. 598 failed on April 1, 1981. • Failed Ordinance No. 603; An ordinance of the City of Kodiak annexing adjoining contiguous property into the City and setting an effective date. Ordinance No. 604 failed on May 14, 1981. • Tabled Ordinance No. 604; An ordinance of the Council of the City of Kodiak annexing adjoining contiguous property into the city and setting an effective date. Re: Tract F in Unit 5 of the Kadiak Alaska subdivision. • Ordinance No. 608; An ordinance of the City of Kodiak annexing adjoining contiguous property into the city and setting an effective date. Annexation of USS 3098, Lots 27A and 27B. Ordinance No. 608 effective on July 11, 1981. • Ordinance No. 622; An ordinance of the City of Kodiak annexing adjoining contiguous property into the city and setting an effective date. Annexation of USS 3098, Lots 20, 21, 22, 23. Ordinance No. 622 effective on November 21, 1981. • Failed Ordinance No. 631; An ordinance setting forth conditions to be met prior to development within the city, and outside the city in cases of extension of public service. Ordinance No. 631 failed on January 14, 1982. Re: public improvements for health and safety of citizens. • Ordinance No. 651; An ordinance of the Council of the City of Kodiak annexing contiguous property into the city and setting an effective date. Annexation of Near, Gull, Round and Uski islands referencing USS 2873 and USS 3066 (see ordinance). Ordinance No. 651 effective on November 18, 1982. 13 Page 29 of 60 City of Kodiak Annexation Discussion Overview AGENDA ITEM #2.c. City of Kodiak Annexation Timeline • Ordinance No. 656; An ordinance of the Council of the City of Kodiak annexing adjoining contiguous property into the city and setting an effective date. Annexation of Lot 1 & 2, Tract M, Block 1 of USS 3218. Ordinance No. 656 effective January 22, 1983 and approved by the Local Boundary Commission on February 28, 1983. • Failed Ordinance No. 665; An ordinance of the City of Kodiak annexing adjoining contiguous property into the city and setting an effective date. Re: Lots 3A and 3B, through 7A and 7B; lots 9A and 9B; and lots 11A and 11B; all in USS 3098. Ordinance No. 665 failed on March 24, 1983. • Failed Ordinance No. 666; An ordinance of the City of Kodiak annexing adjoining contiguous property into the city and setting an effective date. Re: City owned lots 8B and 10B, the privately owned lots 8, 10, 12, 13, and 15A, all of USS 3098, together will the Mill Bay Rd. right of way between the USS 3098 and 1396 to the boundary of the Bancroft subdivision. Ordinance No. 666 failed on March 24, 1983. • Ordinance No. 673; An ordinance of the City of Kodiak annexing adjoining contiguous property into the city and setting an effective date. Annexation of Lots 3A and 3B, through 7A and 7B; Lots 9A and 9B; and Lots and 11A and 11B; all in US Survey 3098. Ordinance No. 673 effective on June 11, 1983 and approved by the Local Boundary Commission on October 9, 1983. • Ordinance No. 674; An ordinance of the City of Kodiak annexing adjoining contiguous property into the city and setting an effective date. Annexation of city owned lots 8B, 10B, and 12B, and the privately owned lots 2, 8A, 10A, 12A, 13, and 15A, together with the sixty foot right of way between lot 2 and lots 3A and 3B, and the portion of Mill Bay road platted at lot 30 all in USS 3098. Ordinance No. 674 effective August 27, 1983 and approved by the Legislature on March 3, 1984. • Failed Ordinance No. 689; An ordinance of the City of Kodiak annexing adjoining contiguous property and into the city and setting and effective date. Ordinance No. failed on July 28, 1983. Re: Lots 8B, 10B, 12B, together with the portion of Mill Bay Rd platted as lot 30, all in USS 3098 also referencing Ordinance No. 673. • Ordinance No. 708; An ordinance of the City of Kodiak annexing adjoining contiguous property into the city and setting an effective date. Re: Corner No. 1 of USS 3468, identical to Corner No. 1 of USS 3098, which is the True Point of Beginning. Ordinance No. 708 effective January 19, 1983. Approved by the Local Boundary Commission on January 7, 1984. • Ordinance No. 716; An ordinance of the City of Kodiak annexing adjoining contiguous property into the city and setting an effective date. Lots A-1 through A-5, Tracts B, C-1, D-1, E, and F of Kadiak Alaska Subdivision, Unit 5, USS 3469. Ordinance No. 716 effective March 22, 1984. Approved by the Local Boundary Commission April 12, 1984. • Failed Ordinance No. 733; An ordinance of the City of Kodiak annexing contiguous territory into the city and setting an effective date. Failed on August 23, 1984. Re: Rezanof Dr. and runway at State airport. • Ordinance No. 771; An ordinance of the City of Kodiak annexing contiguous territory into the city, providing for a special election thereon, and setting and effective date. Ordinance No. 771 effective July 25, 1985. 14 Page 30 of 60 City of Kodiak Annexation Discussion Overview AGENDA ITEM #2.c. City of Kodiak Annexation Timeline • Ordinance No. 775; An ordinance of the City of Kodiak amending Ordinance No. 771 and changing the election date on the question of annexing the "mission lake neighborhood". Ordinance No. 775 effective October 17, 1985. • Ordinance No. 786; An ordinance of the City of Kodiak Repealing Ordinance No. 775, amending Ordinance No. 771, and changing the election date on the question of annexing mission lake area. Re: Special election date. Ordinance No. 786 effective January 18, 1986. • Ordinance No. 797; An ordinance of the City of Kodiak Annexing City -owned contiguous property into the city and setting and effective date. Annexation of VonScheele Way right of way. Ordinance No. 797 effective April 26, 1986. Approved by the C&RA May 8, 1986. • Certificate of Election -April 22, 1986 - certification the corporate boundaries of the City of Kodiak were not extended by vote of the people to the encompass those tracts lying northeasterly of the corporate limits and including all, or all of those portions not already within the corporate limits of US Survey 3066 A & B, Southeast Addition No. 2; 2739; 1822; 2511, Hospital subdivision; 2843, Mission Subdivision; Lots 13, 14, and 15 of 3233; and the unsurveyed portion of Mission Lake bound by 1822, 2843, 3099, and 3233. (Mission Lake Area) • Certificate of Boundaries of the City of Kodiak- May 17, 1986 • Ordinance No. 798; An ordinance of the City of Kodiak annexing contiguous property into the city and setting an effective date. Annexation of Tract S -4A, U.S. Survey 3218. Ordinance No. 798 effective date April 26, 1986. Approved by the Alaska State Legislature March 15, 1987. • Certificate Boundaries of the City of Kodiak - March 16, 1987 • Ordinance No. 806; An ordinance annexing adjoining contiguous property into the city and setting an effective date. Ordinance No. 806 effective November 8, 1986. Approved by the Local Boundary Commission: September 10, 1987. RE: Kodiak King Crab, owner of property • Failed Ordinance No. 809; December 14, 1987 - An ordinance of the Council of the City of Kodiak annexing contiguous property into the city and setting an effective date. Re: Service district #1, Fire protection area no. 1 unsurveyed area bound by USS 3945, 3538A, 3468, 3467, Monashka Bay Alaska subdivision, USS 1678 and ADL 44355. • Ordinance No. 832; An ordinance annexing adjoining contiguous property into the city and setting an effective date. Annexation of Lot 1-2 USS 3218. Ordinance No. 832 effective May 13, 1988 and approved by the Local Boundary Commission on April 25, 1988. Preclearance date as required by the voting rights act of 1965: August 11, 1988. 19905 • Discussion of Annexation; Monashka Bay Service District #1 - February 1, 1991 • Ordinance No. 907; An ordinance annexing adjoining contiguous property into the city and setting an effective date. Annexation of Lakeside Subdivision, Second Addition, per Plat 87-16 Ordinance No. 907 effective date April 28, 1991 and approved by the Local Boundary Commission on June 29, 1991. Preclearance date as required by the voting rights act of 1965: September 16, 1991. 15 Page 31 of 60 City of Kodiak Annexation Discussion Overview AGENDA ITEM #2.c. City of Kodiak Annexation Timeline • Certificate of Boundaries for the City of Kodiak—August 8, 1991 • Failed Ordinance No. 946 —July 22, 1993 — An ordinance annexing adjoining contiguous property into the city and setting an effective date. Re: Salvation Army. • Ordinance No. 985; An ordinance of the Council of the City of Kodiak annexing contiguous property into the city and setting an effective date. Re: Service district #1. Ordinance No. 985 effective April 23, 1994. • Failed Ordinance No. 986 —April 28, 1994 —An ordinance of the Council of the City of Kodiak annexing contiguous territory into the city and setting an effective date. Re: Salvation Army • Ordinance No. 1001; An ordinance of the Council of the City of Kodiak repealing ordinance number 985, which annexed contiguous property into the city and set an effective date. Re: annexation service district #1 and the spruce cape area. Ordinance No. 1001 effective date September 24, 1994. (Petition withdrawn) • Ordinance No. 1065; An ordinance of the Council of the City of Kodiak annexing contiguous property into the city and setting an effective date. Re: Watershed per Ordinance No. 932 and Borough Fire Protection Number one KIB Ordinance 97-16. Ordinance No. 1065 effective date July 25, 1998. The annexation ballot proposition failed with 118 in favor and 887 opposed. 2000s • Ordinance No. 1289; An ordinance of the Council of the City of Kodiak authorizing the annexation of the portions of Lots 1A-1, 1B-2, and 16-3, Lakeside subdivision second addition that are located outside the City of Kodiak, to the City of Kodiak. Ordinance No. 1289 effective October 28, 2011. (As of January 2017 the annexation petition ((Ashford property)) has not been prepared or submitted to LBC.) Page 32 of 60 City of Kodiak Annexation Discussion Overview AGENDA ITEM #2.c. MEMORANDUM TO COUNCIL To: Mayor Branson and City Councilmembers From: Mike Tvenge, City Manager —V< Thru: Matthew Van Daele, Deputy City Manager Date: September 12, 2017 Agenda Item: Annexation Discussion SUMMARY: The following was prepared to aid the Council's discussion regarding annexation of territory adjacent to, but not currently included in the City of Kodiak's Corporate Boundary. This document should be treated as draft information, and if further discussion is desired, additional research will likely be required. ANNEXATION INFORMATION BACKGROUND When the City of Kodiak was incorporated on September 11 `", 1940, the City limits were established along the original Kodiak Townsite's boundary and included approximately 129 acres. In the succeeding 77 years, the City's "Corporate Boundary" has extended to include approximately 2,590 acres of land through "annexations" of various adjoining parcels. Alaska State law has established several procedures for different scenarios regarding annexation. In several instances of past annexations, City property contiguous to (but outside of) the existing Corporate Boundary has been annexed into a revised City Limits. In these cases, the City Council produced (and passed) an Ordinance to annex the "territory," and these Ordinances were then used as the foundation for petitioning the Local Boundary Commission to allow annexation. In most other cases, potentially -annexed territory includes more than just City property, which requires different processes and procedures for annexation to be considered. "Annexation upon unanimous consent of owners and voters" is one such process, in which every property owner within the territory to be annexed, and all voters residing within this territory may unanimously request to be annexed by the neighboring City. If all property owners and all registered voters in the denoted territory are unanimous in their consent to be annexed, the City Council may adopt an Ordinance approving the proposed annexation, followed by a petition to the Local Boundary Commission. Like annexing contiguous City parcels described above, if the Local Boundary Commission approves the petition, annexation may then occur. Finally, a territory can be annexed through an election, known as "annexation by vote." This process requires the requesting City to hold publicly -noticed City Council meetings to discuss proposed annexation before drafting a petition to the Local Boundary Commission, in order to incorporate public input, comments, and concerns into the petition document — or to evaluate whether annexation is worth pursuing. If, after these public meetings the City decides to continue annexation proceedings, and if the Local Boundary Commission approves the petition request, the annexation question will be put onto a ballot for registered voters in both the potentially -annexed territory, as well as registered voters within the existing City limits to decide. If a majority of voters in both areas determine annexation is acceptable, the proposed annexation will take effect. For annexation to be a viable consideration, several key criteria should be considered, such as: SEPTEMBER 12, 2017 Memo Page 1 of 9 Page 33 of 60 City of Kodiak Annexation Discussion Overview AGENDA ITEM #2.c. 1) the territory proposed for annexation is compatible in character with the City to which annexation is proposed, and exhibits a reasonable need for City services; 2) the proposed post -annexation boundaries of the City include both the human and financial resources necessary to provide essential city services on efficient, cost-effective levels; 3) the population within the proposed post -annexation boundaries of the City is sufficiently large and stable to support the extension of these city services; and, 4) the annexation will not deny any person the enjoyment of any civil or political right. The territory both north and south of Kodiak's existing City Limits (already densely populated in the north, and without a population but offering excellent settlement and development potential in the south) are each unique candidates for annexation. The southern territory, though not currently populated, has significant tracts suitable for residential, commercial, and industrial development. The major landowner within this southern territory has recently approached the City to discuss the possibility of annexation, and the City itself has almost 200 acres of land within this territory as well. Existing commercial and recreational areas of the City would flow smoothly into any future development in the territory proposed for annexation, with no significant geographic, cultural, or socioeconomic differences, and future residential development would further add to the strength and stability of the greater Kodiak community. Conversely, the northern territory is populated to a density comparable to the City, and though these individuals shop within City Limits (and thus pay sales tax), registered voters in this territory are disenfranchised simply because they live outside of City Limits. Therefore, even though they pay sales tax, they have no ability to directly participate in the City government to determine how this tax is spent, they are unable to vote in general elections, and they are unable to stand for election themselves. Additionally, nearly all the residences in this territory receive water and sewer services from the City, but pay a 20% higher surcharge on their water and sewer bills. The nature of this territory indicates the residences and residents would benefit from more comprehensive municipal services than what are currently received. Furthermore, in this northern territory, the current arbitrary border of City vs. non -City has created two distinct "classes" of citizens in what should be a homogenous community — those inside the border who are enfranchised to participate in their local government, as well as having reliable police protection and accountable road maintenance; and those outside this border who pay higher property taxes, higher water and sewer rates, and in spite of paying sales taxes are still disenfranchised. Sources: U.S. Survey 2537-4, establishing the boundaries of the Kodiak Townsite; Charter of the City of Kodiak, -Alaska Local Boundary Commission; Alaska Administrative Code 3 AAC 110; Title 29 of the Alaska Statutes; KIB GIS online mapping tool GEOGRAPHIC AREA AND POPULATION "Annexation North" encompasses the northern territory described above, and includes approximately 2 square miles (1,275 acres). It comprises the entirety of the Kodiak Island Borough's Service District Number 1, as well as adjacent undeveloped City property (78 acres), and the City's Wastewater Treatment Plant (6 acres) bordering the service district. The primary landholders are: 1) the Kodiak Island Borough (208 acres); 2) the City of Kodiak (83 acres); 3) Natives of Kodiak (25 acres); 4) the Kodiak Baptist Mission (25 acres); and, 5) all others (934 acres). Accurate population data are not available at this time, but based on a rough count of households (about 1,100) and corresponding census information (available on the us.gov site under Kodiak's 2016 dataset), it is estimated approximately 3,000 people live within this area. SEPTEMBER 12, 2017 Memo Page 2 of 9 Page 34 of 60 City of Kodiak Annexation Discussion Overview AGENDA ITEM #2.c. "Annexation South" also includes approximately 2 square miles (1,317 acres), and reaches from the southern border of the City of Kodiak's existing corporate boundary, to the start of the contiguous USCG reservation encompassing the Kodiak State Airport. There are no residents in this area. The primary landholders are: 1) Natives of Kodiak (644 acres); 2) the State of Alaska (260 acres); 3) the City of Kodiak (198 acres); 4) the United States Coast Guard (73 acres); 5) Kodiak Electric Association (62 acres); 6) Silex LLC (56 acres); and, 7) BLM (24 acres). SEPTEMBER 12, 2017 Memo Page 3 of 9 M Page 35 of 60 City of Kodiak Annexation Discussion Overview AGENDA ITEM #2.c. FIRE PROTECTION, EMS, AND THE KODIAK FIRE DEPARTMENT Locations of the Kodiak Fire Department's Headquarters, Bayside Fire Station, and the areas of Fire Protection Area No. 1 (pink bordered) that fall outside Annexation North (blue shaded) SEPTEMBER 12, 2017 Memo Page 4 of 9 Page 36 of 60 City of Kodiak Annexation Discussion Overview AGENDA ITEM #2.c. Annexation North contains much of the area covered by the Borough's Fire Protection Area No. 1. Bayside Fire Station (the "Headquarters" of Fire Protection Area No. 1) is responsible for providing multiple services in the fire protection area, including fire suppression and prevention, injury prevention, and other associated services. These services are funded through a tax of 1.5 mills on properties within the fire protection area, and in FY 16 this mill rate produced $572,731.83 in revenue. After expenses ($360,492.97), the fund balance was $798.702.00. Fire Protection Area No. l has only one FTE (the Fire Chief), but works to maintain a group of 30 volunteer firefighters. Additionally, the fire protection area's goal is to maintain an ISO (Insurance Services Organization) rating of 4 to maximize cost savings in fire insurance for residents and business owners within this area. Even without annexation of additional areas, current staffing levels at the Kodiak Fire Department (KFD) need to be addressed, including the creation of distinct Driver/Operator positions. This is particularly important due to the existing increases in call volume and situations of handling multiple call -outs simultaneously. Furthermore, the existing Mutual Aid Agreement with Bayside Fire Station and the fact that KFD provides EMS response and transport throughout Kodiak's Road System, KFD is already responding to calls within Annexation North. For adequate continued fire protection, a full-service fire station must be maintained in Annexation North. Bayside Fire Station is the logical choice, due to its existing apparatus, infrastructure, and staff, but Annexation North does not include all of the area protected by Fire Protection Area No. 1. If annexation were to be pursued, it would be essential to work with the Borough to determine the status of all of this fire protection area, such as pursuing a contract with the Borough to expand KFD service into this area. SEPTEMBER 12, 2017 Memo Page 5 of 9 5 Page 37 of 60 City of Kodiak Annexation Discussion Overview AGENDA ITEM #2.c. To determine proper staffing levels, a review of Bayside's station, call records, and thorough communication and consultation with Fire Protection Area No. 1's Fire Chief are essential. Currently it is estimated that an additional 10 FTEs would need to be hired to properly cover Annexation North, but before a review of Fire Protection Area No. 1 and consultation with Bayside's Chief, this figure should only be treated as an estimate. These 10 FTEs would allow three shifts of three watchstanders, plus a "floater" to cover for sick leave, vacation days, and other leaves -of -absence. Bayside's existing cadre of trained volunteers would also need to be retained to assist the FTEs in responding to calls for service. In addition, due to the increased workload, an Assistant Chief (who would serve as the Department's Training Officer) position would be required to meet and maintain the training requirements for all responders in the proposed larger Fire Department. It would be logical to base this Training Chief at Bayside, both to help the overall command structure of KFD, as well as Bayside's excellent existing tradition of and infrastructure relating to support of training activities. Annexation North contains nearly 200 acres of "wildlands," while Annexation South is almost exclusively comprised of wildlands. Currently KFD is not equipped to effectively deal with wildland fires, so additional equipment and apparatus (such as fire tenders) and training would need to be evaluated. Once Annexation South is "built up," with potential retail stores, residential housing units, etc., a satellite fire station would need to be considered to cover any increase in call volume and required emergency response. Adding 10 new FTEs to the Kodiak Fire Department would include the following costs: One -Time Personnel Costs (per FTE) Initial physical testing and verification: $1,000.00 Uniforms and Equipment: $1,600.00 Total per new FTE: $2.600.00 Annual Personnel Costs (per Fire Captain) Average Wages and Benefits: Medical Testing and Evaluations: Uniforms and Equipment: Annual Personnel Costs (per Fire Fighter) Average Wages and Benefits: Medical Testing and Evaluations: Uniforms and equipment: x10: $26,000.00 $156,154.87 $700.00 700.00 Total per new Fire Fighter: $157,554.87 x3: $472,664.61 $111,978.23 $700.00 $700.00 Total per new Fire Captain: $113,378.23 x7: $793,647.61 Total Costs, Year One: $1,292,312.22 Total Costs, Subsequent Years: $1,266,312.22 In addition to the new FTEs, the annual operating budget of Bayside Fire Station would need to be maintained, which has had an average overall expenditure of approximately $600,000.00 over the past five fiscal years. If annexation were to occur, future critical building upgrades and maintenance (estimated to be $450,000.00) would fall under future budgetary considerations. Sources: KIB GIS online mapping tool, KIB Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (FY16), Kodiak Fire Department SEPTEMBER 12, 2017 Memo Page 6 of 9 Page 38 of 60 City of Kodiak Annexation Discussion Overview AGENDA ITEM #2.c. PATROL LEVELS AND THE KODIAK POLICE DEPARTMENT Using the rough estimate of 3,000 citizens in the annexed areas, the City of Kodiak's population level would become 9,191 residents. Established standard operating procedures in many parts of the United States have a ratio of 1.8 officers per 1,000 citizens, increasing to 2.5 officers per 1,000 citizens when the population reaches or exceeds 10,000 residents. Kodiak presents a unique situation with our remote setting, the need to be self-sufficient and self-reliant, and the presence of both the Alaska State Troopers (the "blue shirts") and the Wildlife Troopers. We are currently waiting to receive call volume, call type, and response time statistics from the Alaska State Troopers for the annexation areas, but a very high probability exists that if these areas are annexed (especially Annexation North), a significant number of blue shirt Troopers will be pulled out of the Kodiak Post, based on similar instances that have occurred elsewhere in the State. Even though residents of Monashka experience long delays between reporting an incident and Trooper arrival, the presence of the State Troopers on Kodiak provides a "force multiplier" for KPD, particularly in high-risk situations. Therefore, even though we would not achieve the 10,000 citizen threshold, it would be prudent for response time, citizen safety, and unit cohesion/morale to aim for the ratio of 2.5 officers per 1,000 citizens if annexation were to occur, which currently equates to hiring an additional 8 officers. Adding the required 8 new patrol officers includes the following costs: One -Time Personnel Costs (per officer) Workstations and IT equipment: Weapons and Tools: Training: $1,875.00 $1,500.00 $5,000.00 Academy Tuition and Training (though in the past this was covered by the State, due to the current financial situation the full cost may be borne by the City): $11,000.00 Total per new Officer: $19,375.00 x8: $155,000.00 Annual. Personnel Costs (per officer) Average Wages and Benefits: Uniforms and Vests: One -Time Equipment Costs Patrol Vehicles: $119,740.00 $1,695.00 Total per new Officer: $121,435.00 X8: $971,480.00 $45,000.00 x4: $180,000.00 Total Costs, Year One: $1,306,480.00 Total Costs, Subsequent Years: $971,480.00 Sources: KIB GIS online mapping tool, Kodiak Police Department, International Association of Chiefs of Police PUBLIC WORKS — ROADS, WATER, AND SEWER Annexation North comprises the territory currently included in the Kodiak Island Borough's Service District No. 1. This service district was originally created to provide water, sanitary sewer, and road services to its residents, but in 1995 the service district divested itself of the water and sewer infrastructure, and the City took ownership. Because the annexed areas in the north are already on existing water and sewer systems maintained by the City's Public Works Department, no measurable additional costs will be realized by annexing this area into the City's SEPTEMBER 12, 2017 Memo Page 7 of 9 Page 39 of 60 City of Kodiak Annexation Discussion Overview AGENDA ITEM #2.c. corporate boundary. However, there will be a subsequent drop in revenue from bills due to the higher fees (20% greater than those in City limits) paid by customers residing outside City limits. Roughly 60% of the roads (equaling 11.2 miles) in this territory are managed by Service District No. 1, which rather than being directly managed by (and accountable to) a public works department, are instead governed by an elected Board. Maintenance activities, possible improvements, and contracts are primarily determined by this Board, and rather than direct contact with a public works department, there is a complaint -based system for citizens to file "complaint forms" for possible consideration by the Road Service Area Board. Within Service District No. 1, there are three smaller "sub -districts;" the Trinity Islands and Woodland Acres lighting districts (to provide street lighting for these neighborhoods) and the Mission Lake Tide Gate service district (to protect properties adjacent to Mission Lake). If annexation were to occur, the responsibilities of these service districts would likely be assumed by the City's Public Works Department. The City already maintains some street lighting within the existing Corporate Boundary, so there would be little change in either the Trinity Islands or the Woodland Acres lighting districts, particularly because these two accounts have approximate fund balances of $29,000.00 and $30,000.00, respectively. The Mission Lake Tide Gate account has a fund balance of approximately $48,000.00, which was established and managed to cover future maintenance costs of the tide gate. However, it is important to note it is not known if these fund balances would be transferred to the City from the Borough if annexation were to occur. The greater Service District No. 1, and its road maintenance and repair, would be a much more significant undertaking for our current Public Works Department. The 11.2 miles of road are not contiguous, which would result in greater transit times than currently experienced for road maintenance and work within City Limits (which would be particularly noticeable during snowfall events), and approximately 80% of the Service District roads are gravel (the main paved road is Sharatin, at approximately 1/4 of a mile long). The predominance of gravel roads would offer its own unique challenges, and would likely result in the need of hiring an additional 4 FTEs and purchasing a pair of road graders to effectively maintain safe driving conditions for the residents. It is very likely that if annexation were to occur, maintaining existing contracts (or seeking new ones) that had been established by the Service District would be advisable as we evaluated the best course of action for the newly annexed territory, and the Public Works Department evaluated its own needs and abilities. Although the water and sewer in this territory is already maintained by the Public Works Department, adding the residents who reside in this territory to the population of the City of Kodiak would be bringing our population very close to the 1.0,000 resident threshold that may result in new regulations and considerations by State and Federal agencies regarding public water and sanitary sewer systems. Meeting or exceeding the 10,000 resident level is important to research further, and as with the other aspects of public works and annexation, more time is needed to consult with our Public Works Department to evaluate the challenges and opportunities associated with possible annexation of this territory. Sources; KIB GIS online mapping tool, KIB Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (FYI 6), City of Kodiak Public Works Department PARKS AND RECREATION Our Parks and Recreation Department is currently maintaining all of the ball fields outside the existing Corporate Boundary, which includes grounds keeping, event scheduling, and structural (including fence) repairs. It is estimated that this work amounts $2,500.00 annually, and approximately 8 hours of labor per week. If annexation were to occur, it is anticipated that there would be some additional costs (waste bins, picnic tables, fertilizer and seed, etc.), and potentially an additional 8 hours per week of work. However, the overall impact on the Parks & Rec Department would be minimal, because of the existing work being conducted in this territory. Conversely, SEPTEMBER 12, 2017 Memo Page 8 of 9 E:3 Page 40 of 60 City of Kodiak Annexation Discussion Overview AGENDA ITEM #2.c. with a full-time Parks & Rea Department assuming responsibility and oversight of the ball fields and parks in the territory included in Annexation North, residents would enjoy better service in their neighborhood parks. Sources: City of Kodiak Parks and Recreation Department FINANCE - MILL RATE The Kodiak Island Borough's certified 2017 tax rolls report a total value (after exemptions) of the following areas that fall within the boundary of Annexation North: TCA 7 (Service District One): $290,431,999.00 TCA 2 (Woodland Acres Street Lights): $55,592,900.00 TCA 72 (Trinity Islands Street Lights): $13,391,000.00 TCA 71 (Mission Lake Tide Gate): $6,942,300.00 TOTAL: $366,358,199.00 If annexed, these areas would all fall within the City's Tax Code Area, which is a flat rate of 2.00 mills. Correspondingly, these areas would see a marked reduction in their property taxes, as follows: TCA 7 (Service District One): -1.75 mills off current tax bills TCA 2 (Woodland Acres Street Lights): -1.85 mills TCA 72 (Trinity Islands Street Lights): -1.95 mills TCA 71 (Mission Lake Tide Gate): -2.75 mills Even with these reduced taxes, based on the City's flat tax of 2.00 mills and the 2017 certified tax rolls, annexation of this northern area would produce $732,716.40 in revenue. The properties in Annexation South fall within TCA 5 (Rural and Remote Borough), which is only subject to the flat Borough -wide base rate of 10.75 mills. The only currently non-exempt property in Annexation South is the 56.28 acre Silex, LLC parcel, with an assessed value of $353,000.000. Accordingly, this parcel would see an increase in its tax bill due to the 2.00 mills of property within City limits. At this time we do not have solid estimates or projections of sales tax revenue within the two potentially -annexed areas. There are not currently any retail establishments in Annexation South, while there are some retail, restaurant, and fuel service businesses located in Annexation North. Data from the 1999 study, though nearly two decades old, indicated estimated sales tax revenue of $236,040.00, which when accounting for inflation is equal to roughly $350,000.00 in current dollars. However, it is not known how many businesses have opened (or closed) in this area since 1999, nor how the original figure of $236,040.00 was calculated. Sources: KIB 2017 certified tax rolls, FY2018 KIB mill rates, 1999 Petition for Annexation to the City of territory northerly of the current City limits NEXT STEPS? If the Council wanted to continue discussion and consideration regarding annexation, it is advised to further research the impact adding this territory would have on our Public Works Department, specifically with what permits, regulations, certifications, and infrastructure improvements may be required if we reached or surpassed 10,000 residents of the City of Kodiak. Additionally, the sales tax figures above are not up-to-date, and it would be advisable to develop (or at least seek) a stronger dataset. SEPTEMBER 12, 2017 Memo Page 9 of 9 Page 41 of 60 City of Kodiak Annexation Discussion Overview w O h 7 O a v D D CD X v o' D 0 c n c o' O CD CD N O d) O n c� m z °n m N w 0 h 7 0 a v D D CD X v 0 D 0 c 0 c 0 O CD 0 w 0 0 n c� m z °n m N NF s. Annexation Sout c w 0 h 7 0 a v D D CD X v 0 D 0 c 0 c 0 O CD 0 cn 0 0 n c� m z °n m N w 0 h 7 0 a v D D CD X v 0 D 0 c 0 c 0 O CD 0 0 0 n c� m z °n m N w 0 h 7 0 a v D D CD X v 0 D 0 c 0 c 0 O CD CD 0 0 n c� m z °n m N w 0 h 7 0 a v D D CD X v 0 D 0 c 0 c 0 O CD 0 OD 0 0 n c� m z °n m N w 0 h 7 0 a v D D CD X v 0 D 0 c 0 c 0 O CD 0 0 0 n c� m z °n m N w 0 h 7 0 21 0) D D X a s' D 0 c 0 0 0 CD V CD 0 0 0 Next Steps? If the Council desires: i. Determining population gain a. EPA, DEC regs for w/s 3. Sales tax? 4. Communication 5. Benefits, and Costs Enfranchisement Increased Services .9 rn z °n m N n ...does it pencil out? F _ � . -- ��r� . •- - _- y ` 43 _ _art I ~' �"•��' .--t .I. -mow 1 4b now, bar - .9 rn z °n m N n AGENDA ITEM #2.c. MEMORANDUM TO COUNCIL To: Mayor Branson and City Councilmembers From: Mike Tvenge, City Manager Thru: Matthew Van Daele, Deputy City Manager, l� Date: November 7, 2017 Agenda Item: Annexation Update SUMMARY: At the September 12th work session, Council directed staff to continue researching annexation. We have some new and refined information to present, but are requesting direction from the Council on next steps. To develop solid facts and figures for your consideration will take a higher commitment of staff time and formal collaboration with our colleagues in the Borough. It is staff's recommendation to take this approach to ensure we are developing the best available data and information for your decision, as well as for the public to have while they weigh any pros or cons of annexation. NEW INFORMATION• EMS SERVICE OUTSIDE OF CITY LIMITS The Kodiak Fire Department has been evaluating call volume statistics of EMS calls within City limits vs. those into the Borough. The "land mass" of the City of Kodiak is approximately four square miles, while the area of the Borough to which the City provides EMS service (up to 1/4 mile off the established road system) is approximately 50 square miles. Conversely, since 2012, roughly 2/3rd' of calls for EMS service have been for locations within City limits, while the remaining 1/3`d were for locations outside of City limits (in the Borough). Of these calls to locations outside the City, 50% were to Fire Protection Area Number 1, and staff is currently tabulating the monetary figure of this City -provided service. CURRENT KODIAK POLICE DEPARTMENT STAFFING LEVELS The Kodiak Police Department currently has 11 officers assigned to patrol functions, which is below Nationally -accepted standards for the recommended level of staffing. The policing formula used by the International Association of Chiefs of Police indicate that the City of Kodiak should hire six additional officers to meet the needs for our current City residents, as well as the daily influx of people into the City from the Borough for work, school attendance, shopping, and leisure. Continued evaluation of the situation in Downtown Kodiak, coupled with concerns of business owners and citizens, have consistently demonstrated an immediate need for four additional police officers. Hiring these four officers in the near future will help with the protection of downtown assets, and service to its visitors and business owners. Additionally, this would offset the cost of a possible future annexation by reducing the hire of additional police officers to just four more individuals needed to serve the residents of Annexation North. NOVEMBER 7, 2017 Memo Page 1 of 2 15 Page 51 of 60 City of Kodiak Annexation Discussion Overview AGENDA ITEM #2.c. PUBLIC WORKS Similarly to the Kodiak Police Department, there is an immediate need for additional support to the department of Public Works to meet current expected service requirements. The two loaders in their inventory (a Case 621B and a Case 821B) are 21 and 22 years old, respectively, and have reached the end of their useful terms of service to the citizens of the City of Kodiak. Public Works staff have done an exemplary job of keeping these loaders running and operating, but the time has come from both a safety standpoint as well as simple efficiencies to purchase "new" (i.e., used, like -new) loaders. Having replacement loaders in our inventory will reduce costs in terms of parts and labor, and increase the amount of work possible through greater transit speed and fuel efficiency. In addition to the two loaders, a "new" grader (to replace one of the undersized and too lightly -constructed Case 885 graders) is an immediate need for the City's fleet. The City's two Case graders were purchased in 2004 and 2005, but have not held up to the rigors of snow removal and have had perennial dependability issues, resulting in greater maintenance costs compounded by lost time spent trying to keep them functional. As such, it is highly unlikely that these graders will make it to 2022 or 2023, which is their scheduled replacement after 18 years of service. The three Caterpillar graders currently in the inventory are from 2011 (two of this year) and 2015. Though these graders have been very dependable and effective, there is very little overlap when in 2029 we will need to seriously begin considering replacement, and that they may ultimately need replacing within years of each other. Therefore, it would be wise to begin introducing some staggering of asset purchases to minimize the risk of multiple equipment failures occurring at or near the same time. Having these replacement pieces of more efficient equipment will increase the ability of Public Works to rapidly meet service requirements, thus reducing overall costs to the City and allowing a more cost-effective annexation (should that occur). For instance, while it may be more prudent to still have certain types of snowfall events removed by a private company contracted by the City in the area of Service District Number 1, other routine road repair, upkeep, and maintenance could conceivably be covered by an existing Public Works fleet. NEXT STEPS Staff requests that the Council give direction as to your desire regarding further annexation research. It would be useful to know if there are specific questions or concerns the Council would like staff to address, as well as giving specific direction to begin collaboration and dialogue with our colleagues in the Kodiak Island Borough to create the best -possible list of information, statistics, and costs for your consideration. Staff has identified the best course of action to be research conducted in partnership with Service Area Number 1, Fire Protection Area Number 1, and the Borough Manager (as a start) to begin developing a solid set of facts and figures needed for the Council and the public to make an informed decision regarding any merits or causes of concern of potential annexation of territory into the City of Kodiak's corporate boundaries. NOVEMBER 7, 2017 Memo Page 2 of 2 Page 52 of 60 City of Kodiak Annexation Discussion Overview DRAFT WHITE PAPER ON ANNEXATION AGENDA ITEM #2.c. "Annexation to a city" means expanding the city's boundaries to include more territory. Additionally, annexation is the expansion of the jurisdiction of a city into new territory and the means by which the corporate boundaries of city governments are updated or refined. Annexation results in extending city services, city regulations, city voting privileges, and city taxing authority to the annexed territory." -Local Boundary Commission Introduction: Since the 1950's, the City of Kodiak has adjusted its corporate boundaries through the annexation process to accommodate community growth and adapt to the increasing demand and need for public services. Per Alaska's constitution and statutes, any proposed boundary change, including annexation, must be approved by the Local Boundary Commission (LBC). State law requires certain standards be met, and certain procedures be followed in order for the commission to approve a proposed annexation. One requirement is for the municipality to submit a 'petition' to the Local Boundary Commission. If the LBC approves the petition, in most cases, either Kodiak voters need to approve it, or the Legislature must not disapprove it for the annexation to take effect. Background: For the past two years, Council and staff have held seven work sessions to understand the history of annexation in Kodiak, about annexation in other parts of the state, discuss research, hosted a presentation from the LBC staff, and explored various scenarios and options for annexation. At the September 24, 2019 work session, Council agreed upon principles that outline their values and take into consideration the uniqueness of our community. The principles are intended to provide the structure and opportunity for the Council to guide the decision making process and to help set a course for future community development in Kodiak. The guiding principles are: • Transparency in the Process: Annexation is a legal process. Proposing the addition of land and population to City Boundaries requires coordination and work with all citizens, stakeholders, the Local Boundary Commission, City and Borough staff, and the City Attorney. Following statutory guidelines is necessary for any process to work. It should be fully transparent and no one should be left out of the public process. • Cost Effectiveness in Service Delivery: In recognition of the city's budgetary constraints, it's unknown at this time if it makes fiscal sense to pursue annexation. Given the central role of service provision in annexation, the fiscal impact of these actions and understanding the revenues necessary to pay for services is critical and must be clearly understood. White Paper on Annexation 44 Page 53 of 60 City of Kodiak Annexation Discussion Overview AGENDA ITEM #2.c. • Expansion of City Services: Areas of evaluation and fiscal analysis v. public benefit includes the extension of police protection, mutual aid fire response, road maintenance, recreational facilities, and infrastructure. These are critical services that will require some complex research and analysis for the Council's consideration. The Council also recognizes that the City presently provides programs, services and activities outside of City limits (Water & Sewer, Woody Way Field, North Star Elementary, Dark Lake, School Lawn Care, EMS, Fire, Building Inspection, Animal Control, Emergency Dispatch etc.). • Preserving a Sense of Place: Expanded political boundaries can more clearly reflect the true and existing sociological, economic, cultural, and physical boundaries of the city. Annexation can lead to a unified community by allowing business, professional, and community leaders who currently live outside city boundaries to have a more direct role in community affairs by, elections including being elected or appointed to public office. • Community Outreach: Kodiak residents and voters need to know how the annexation process works and how it could potentially impact them. Outreach must be tailored to get the public information they need, effectively and efficiently before annexation can be voted on. This work can be accomplished through focus groups, community surveys, presentations to local member organizations like the Chamber of Commerce, Natives of Kodiak, and other civic and governmental agency meetings upon request. Before a petition to expand city boundaries is finalized, the City's priority will be to create a robust community outreach plan so citizens will have the knowledge and understanding of any proposed changes to City boundaries. Areas Being Considered for Annexation: In an effort to advance policy discussions and recommendations over the next several months relative to annexation, the Council has directed staff to move forward with research and evaluation of Annexation North and Annexation South. Ongoing research and analysis of annexing these areas will culminate in public work sessions where the Council will continue a dialogue on annexation. Annexation North — This area includes approximately 12 miles of road (six maintained by the State of Alaska and Service District No.1 contracts) and is comprised of the entire Kodiak Island Borough's Service District 1, as well as undeveloped City of Kodiak Property and the City's Wastewater Treatment Plant. In the past, residents of Service District No. 1 have signed petitions in support of being annexed into the City of Kodiak (per Ordinance 1065). Annexation South — This area includes approximately 2 square miles (approximately 1,317 acres) and reaches from the southern border of the City of Kodiak's existing boundary to the State Airport. There are seven primary landowners in this area and the largest being the Natives of Kodiak (approx. 644 acres). In 2017, the Natives of Kodiak approached the City to discuss the possibility of annexation. In addition, the City of Kodiak owns approximately 200 acres in the tract of land identified as being suitable for future development, potentially adding to the economic strength and stability of the greater Kodiak community. White Paper on Annexation 45 Page 54 of 60 City of Kodiak Annexation Discussion Overview AGENDA ITEM #2.c. DRAFT ANNEXATION FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Q. Why does the City desire to annex my area? A. The City's charter is to provide for efficient, adequate, and economical governance to the Citizens of Kodiak. Areas around Kodiak generally surrounded by the City but are not within the corporate boundaries are already receiving city services, such as water and sewer utilities. It is the goal of the city to facilitate a vibrant and unified community environment. Q. What kinds of regulatory changes should I anticipate if my property is annexed? A. It is important to know that these areas have identical development codes relative to building, zoning, and subdivision standards. There is also no change between the City and proposed annexed areas with regard to the discharge of firearms and operation of ATVs. Business Sales Tax Registration would be required under current city code. Q. What services are provided by the City? a. Water & Sewer Utilities —Since 1995, the City's Public Works Department has provided water and sewer service in the proposed Annexation North and will continue to be provided by the City in the future. b. Animal Control —The City has a full level of animal control services that are already available in both proposed annexation areas by the Kodiak Police Department. c. City Parks and Recreation — The City's Parks and Recreation staff already maintain and provide services outside of City limits including Woody Way field, Dark Lake, North Star Elementary programs, and School lawn care. All pricing to participate in City programs is the same for everyone, regardless of where you live. d. Extended 24/7 Police Protection — The Kodiak Police Department maintains a well -staffed Department to provide a level of service within Annexation FAQ 46 Page 55 of 60 City of Kodiak Annexation Discussion Overview AGENDA ITEM #2.c. the City. Upon annexation, standard patrols throughout your neighborhood will be added. e. Fire and Emergency Medical Services (EMS) —The City currently provides EMS in the proposed annexation areas. Fire protection is provided through a mutual aid agreement with Bayside. f. Extended City Street Maintenance — The City of Kodiak currently provides road maintenance including repairs, street sweeping, snow removal, grading, striping, and paving services. Upon annexation, these services will continue. g. City Library — All residents currently have access to Public Library services with no changes. Q. Will my taxes or utility rates change? A. These rates are approved by the Borough Assembly and City Council and are subject to change. Q. If annexed, do I obtain Building Permits from the City or Borough? A. Currently, building permits are obtained from the Joint Department of Building Safety and this will not change after annexation. Q. If annexed will my zoning change? A. No, in your area, the City and the Borough zoning regulations are the same. Q. Does the City have any current or pending lawsuits or liabilities that would affect me if annexed? A. No. Q. When are City Council meetings? A. The Kodiak City Council meets on the second and fourth Thursdays of every month at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers at 710 Mill Bay Road. Q. If annexed, will my voice in local government change? A. Yes, you will be able to vote in City elections and be represented by the Mayor and Kodiak City Council. In addition, many of the city's nine Boards and Committees have requirements of city residency. If annexed, Annexation FAQ 47 Page 56 of 60 City of Kodiak Annexation Discussion Overview AGENDA ITEM #2.c. you could volunteer to serve on the Boards or Committees. After one year of residency, you can run for Mayor or City Council. Q. Do the residents of the proposed annexation area get to vote on annexation? A. There are several annexation methods authorized by State law. If Council directs staff to move forward with the proposed Annexation North, the method of annexation will be decided. Regardless of the method of annexation used, State Law requires the annexing jurisdiction to hold public hearings on any proposed annexation. Hearings are an opportunity for community members to give public testimony on the proposal. Q. What are the benefits of annexation? A. The current situation artificially creates two classes of Kodiak citizens. Those inside the City who have voting rights in City elections, enjoy the benefits of greater police protection and road maintenance, and pay residential rates for water and sewer utilities, and those outside the City who do not vote in City elections, receive less police protection and road maintenance, and pay higher utility rates. Annexation would bring both groups into parity, affording all residents equal voting rights and services at equivalent costs. For everyone, it means a greater sense of community, where we make decisions together about how to improve our quality of life in Kodiak. Annexation FAQ M. Page 57 of 60 City of Kodiak Annexation Discussion Overview M X v y gull Automated Rear Resistant Roll -Out Carl D Q Meets and/or exceeds all ANSI standards for type B & G containers 0 3 ocn • TO • PRESS TABS WHILE LIFTING LID TO OPEN r v CD Cn co 0 DO NOT PLACE IN CART: ANYTHING HOT - FIRE, BARBECUE ASHES, LIQUIDS, FLAMMABLE LIQUIDS, CHEMICALS, TOXICS, HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, SAND, SOIL AND OTHER HEAVY MATERIALS THIS REHRIG CONTAINER IS DESIGNED TO CONTAIN HOUSEHOLD WASTE AND SIMILAR REFUSE PRODUCTS DO: CLOSE LID BEFORE MOVING RINSE OCCASIONALLY DO NOT: PLAY IN OR AROUND OVERLOAD ��Esi Nr o� 0 (;142': 'GLY BEW � l' numlo-r IGBC Certification Number 5151 �I�FE© "- B.W Col..W Cons mbw Pound. non CERTIFIED FOR TYPE B & G CONTAINERS 1' chriq acico Qompan� WWW.REHRIGPACIFIC.COM PATENT PENDING 95 BEAR CART LID vision PLACE CONTAINER WITH ARROWS FACING THE STREET FOR COLLECTION TO MOVE CART 1) GRASP HANDLE 2) TILT 3) PUSH OR PULL M X v y gull Automated Rear Resistant Roll -Out Carl D Q Meets and/or exceeds all ANSI standards for type B & G containers 0 3 ocn • TO • PRESS TABS WHILE LIFTING LID TO OPEN r v CD Cn co 0 DO NOT PLACE IN CART: ANYTHING HOT - FIRE, BARBECUE ASHES, LIQUIDS, FLAMMABLE LIQUIDS, CHEMICALS, TOXICS, HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, SAND, SOIL AND OTHER HEAVY MATERIALS THIS REHRIG CONTAINER IS DESIGNED TO CONTAIN HOUSEHOLD WASTE AND SIMILAR REFUSE PRODUCTS DO: CLOSE LID BEFORE MOVING RINSE OCCASIONALLY DO NOT: PLAY IN OR AROUND OVERLOAD ��Esi Nr o� 0 (;142': 'GLY BEW � l' numlo-r IGBC Certification Number 5151 �I�FE© "- B.W Col..W Cons mbw Pound. non CERTIFIED FOR TYPE B & G CONTAINERS 1' chriq acico Qompan� WWW.REHRIGPACIFIC.COM PATENT PENDING 95 BEAR CART LID vision PLACE CONTAINER WITH ARROWS FACING THE STREET FOR COLLECTION TO MOVE CART 1) GRASP HANDLE 2) TILT 3) PUSH OR PULL M X v y gull Automated Rear Resistant Roll -Out Carl D Q Meets and/or exceeds all ANSI standards for type B & G containers 0 3 ocn • TO • PRESS TABS WHILE LIFTING LID TO OPEN r v CD M 0 0 DO NOT PLACE IN CART: ANYTHING HOT - FIRE, BARBECUE ASHES, LIQUIDS, FLAMMABLE LIQUIDS, CHEMICALS, TOXICS, HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, SAND, SOIL AND OTHER HEAVY MATERIALS THIS REHRIG CONTAINER IS DESIGNED TO CONTAIN HOUSEHOLD WASTE AND SIMILAR REFUSE PRODUCTS DO: CLOSE LID BEFORE MOVING RINSE OCCASIONALLY DO NOT: PLAY IN OR AROUND OVERLOAD ��Esi Nr o� 0 (;142': 'GLY BEW � l' numlo-r IGBC Certification Number 5151 �I�FE© "- B.W Col..W Cons mbw Pound. non CERTIFIED FOR TYPE B & G CONTAINERS 1' chriq acico Qompan� WWW.REHRIGPACIFIC.COM PATENT PENDING 95 BEAR CART LID vision PLACE CONTAINER WITH ARROWS FACING THE STREET FOR COLLECTION TO MOVE CART 1) GRASP HANDLE 2) TILT 3) PUSH OR PULL