KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH LANDFILL SUB LT 1B - ZCP 7/2/2026March 26,2015
,I'HE S'IhJ'Ii
GovERNoR Btn \\ralxEn
,fALASru Department of Environmental
Conservation
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Solid Waste Program
555 Cordovo Streel
Anchoroge, AK 99501
Phone: 907.269.7ffi2
Fox: 907 .269.7 600
www.dec.olosko.gov
Cerlilled Moll #7008 tBil0 qrCB 52(B 514!t
Relurn Recelpt Requerled
Rtr,:
Mr. Mark I(ozak
Public STorks Director
Ciry of Kodiak
2410 Mill B^y Road
Kodiak, AK 99615
I(odiak Biosolids Composting Facility
Solid Waste Pcrmit No. SWXA060-20
Dear Mr. Kozak:
The Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC) has completed its evaluation of the
City of Kodiak petrnit application for the construcdon and operation of a sewage solids treafirent
facility, the Kodiak Biosolids Composting Facility. The facility is located adjacent to the landEll on
Monashka Bay Road approximately six miles northwest of the City of Kodiak, within Section 30,
Range 19 West, Township 27 South, Sewatd Meridian. Please teview the conditions and stipulations
in the permit and ensure that they are understood. This permit is being issued in accordance with
Alaska Satute (AS) a6.03; Tide 18, Chapter 15 of the Alaska Adminisuative Code (18 AAC 15); and
thc Solid Waste Regulations (18 AAC 60).
Any person who disagtees with this decision may tequest an adjudicatory hearing in accordance with
18 AAC 15.195 - 18 AAC 15.340 or an informal review by the Division Director in accotdance with
18 AAC 15.185. Infonnal review requests must be detvered to the Division Director, Alaska
Departmcnt of Environmental Consewation, 555 Cordova Street, Anchotage, AK 99501 within 15
days of the permit decision. Adjudicatory headng requests must be delivered to the Commissioner
of the Departrnent of Environmental Conservation, 410 Willoughby Avenue, Suite 303, Juneau,
Alaska 99801, within 30 days of the pcrmit decision. If a headng is not requested within 30 days, the
dght to appeal is waived. More information tegarding submitting a request fot an infotmal teview or
adjudicatory hearing may be found at www.dec.state.ak.us/commish/ReviewGuidance.htm. Even if
an adjudicatory hearing has been requested and granted, all permit conditions remain in effect unless
a stay has been granted.
Please contact Lod Alddch at (907) 269-7622 or by email at loti.aldrich@alaska.gov if you have any
questions, or requirc any additional information.
Sincerely,
Robert J.P.E.
Solid Waste & Pesticides Progtam Manager
Enclosure: Permit #SWXA060-72, expiring on March 2612020
STATE OF AI.ASKA
DEPARTMENT OF EI{YI RONMENTAL CONSERVATI ON
555 Cordova Street
Anchorage, AK 99501
SOLID WASTE TREATMENT PERMIT
Permit No. SWXA060-20
Date Effective:
Date Expites:
MaEEh 26,2015
March 26-2020
The Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC), undet authority of AS 46.03 and
18 AAC 60, issues a solid waste disposal permit to:
City of Kodiak
Kodiak Biosolids Composting Facility
2410 Mill Bry Road
Kodialq AK 99615
and designated representadves for the opetation of a facility to tteat sewage solids by composting
using the static aerated pile method. The compost will be managed, the composting cell
temperatures monitored, and the compost analyzed to demonsuate pathogen reduction, vectot
attraction reduction, and metals concentradons for the Class A Exceptional Quality (EQ) Biosolids
exempdons under 40 CFR 503 and 18 AAC 60.510(0. The pathogen rcduction tequirements ensrue
that the pathogens have been killed in the treatrnent process and the vectot attraction reduction
requkements ensure that the biosolids have been treated to a point to reduce odors and other
atftaction to animds and insects, which allows for classification as Class A Biosolids. In addition,
the finished product is tested for metds to ensure that the material is of sufficient quality to be used
in a btoad range of applicadons (EQ). The compost meeting these standards may be distributed as
soil amendment, witlout testdcdon.
The Kodiak Biosolids Composting Facility is located adiacent to the Kodiak Island Borough landfill
on Monashka Bay Road approximately six miles northwest of the City of Kodiak, within Section 30,
Range 19 West, Township 27 South, Sewatd Meddian.
The permit holdet shall manage and opemte the facility in accordance with:
o 18 AAC 60;
. 40 CFR 503; and,
o permit application materids, dated October 3,2014.
In addition, the following pemrit conditions arc required:
Specific Conditions
FACILI'TY
1. Maintain a locking gate at the entrance of the facility to control public access to the site.
2. Post signage at the facility gate identifring the facility name, owner, operator, hours of operation,
and emergency phone numbem.
I
Kodiak Biosolids Composting Facility
Permit #SWXA060-20
Page 2 of 5
March 26,2075
3. Limit sewage solids accepted for treatrnent to those generated from permitted wastewater
fteatment facilities. Bulking agents may include wood, paper, cardboatd, leaves, ot othet clean
material apptopriate for composting.
4. Maintain a separation distance of at least 50 feet ftom all treated or unffeated sewage solids and
storage areas to the ptoperty [ine.
OPERATIONS
5. Perform treatment operadons in accordance with the CiE of Kodiak, Alaska ConpostingFacili4t
Operation and Maintenanee Manual, dated October 2074.
6. Composted materials rnay not be removed from the curing atea until sampling results con6.rm
pathogen reducdon to Class A standatds.
7. Any piles of composted materid that do not meet all the requirements fot Class A EQ biosolids,
^t arrry point prior to being distdbuted, may not be sold, given away, or used without furthet
approval ftom ADEC to ensure that the use or disposal meets the tequirements of 40 CFR 503
and 18 AAC 60.
8. Make information available to users indicating that the compost may not be used fot produce
certified as organic fot purposes of marketing.
MONITORING
9. AII sampling must be performed by qualified petsonnel, trained in the necessary sampling
methods and quality assurance ptocedures.
10. A sampling procedures guide must be submitted to ADEC fot apptoval at least 60 days prior to
the fust delivery of sludge to the facility.
11. AII sampling events must include a duplicate sample fot each ten (10) samples collected for each
method, for analysis.
12. Sludge Cake must be analyzed quarterly for Polychlorinated Biphenyls (?CB's) using one, three-
point composite, sample collected over a one-week period from three individual sludge loads. If
any result contains a concentration greater than one (t) mg/kg PCBs, the material must be
disposed at a landfill permitted to accept polluted soil, and accotding to 18 AAC 60.365.
13. Each cell of composted materid must be analyzed fot fecal coliform or Salmonella spp., and
tesults must confirm ghg rn2lgrirl meets Class A standards for pathogens. Sampling must
include at least 4 individual samples ftom a range of locadons within 24 inches of the surface of
the pile. Sampling must be done prior to ot dudng bteakdown of the composting cell. If any
sample results do not meet the requirements for Class A compost, the material and any material
with which it has been comingled in the curing cell must bc renrmed fot teEeatnent.
14. Finished compost must be analyzed and demonstrete concenttadons (dry weight basis) less than
the standard for each of the metals in Table 1 to allow the material to be exempt from the
ADEC permit requirement for land application of biosolids [18 AAC 60.510&)] and to be
considered EQ Biosolids.
Kodiak Biosolids Composting
Permit #SW)G060-20
P.g. 3 of 5
March 26,2015
Table 1
Analyte Standard
(-elKs)
Arsenic 41
Cadmium 39
Chromium (total)1200
Copper 1 500
Lead 300
Merctrry 17
Molybdenum 75
Nickel 420
Selenium 100
Ztnc 2800
15. Quarterly sampling of finished compost product, for fecal coliform or Salmonella spp., must
include at least 8 individud samples from each storage pile, from a tatge of locations within the
core of the pile.
16. Monthly visual monitoring must include monitodng of the unnamed stream for any signs of
sediment run off from the facility.
RE,PORTING
17. Each Compost Pile Data Sheet must include the following statement and a signature
confi.rmation of the operator:
I certify, under penalty of law, that the information that will be used to determine compliance with
the Class A pathogen requirements in $503.32(a) and the vector attraclion redudion requirement in
(insert one of the veclor attraction redudion requirements in S503.33(bX1) through (b)(8)) was
prepared under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure
that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate this inbrmation. I am aware that there are
significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment.
18. Submit an annual report to ADEC and EPA, no later than Febnrary 19 of each year and
summarizing the compost facility ptoduction for the previous calendar yeat.
Submit a mid-year report to ADEC summatizing the compost facility production for the
first two quarters of the year no later than September 1 of each year.
b. Reports to ADEC should include copies of monthly report sheets; notation of any material
that did not meet Class A EQ standatds, an assessment of why it did not meet standards,
how the matedal was handled; and, a brief narrative desctibing any significant problems
andf or improvements in operations at the facility.
CLOSURF] & RESTORATION
19. NotiS the Department at least ten working days before the sewage solids treatrnent operations
cease and equipment is temoved ftom the site.
,tl
Kodiak Biosolids Compos ting Facility
Permit #SW)G060-20
Page 4 of 5
March 26,2015
20. Ensure that all areas and equipment that have had contact with sewage solids are cleaned and
disinfected. This would include ftont-loader buckets, vehide tracks or dres, hoppers, belts, or
eghsf, ditgsl contact areas of solids contact with equipment, as well as ,ueas where untreated
solids was stored or spilled.
General Conditions
1. Access and inspection - The Petmittee shall allow the Commissioner or his reptesentative access
to the petmitted facilities at reasonable times to conduct scheduled or unscheduled inspections
or tests to determine compliance with this permit, State laws, and regulations.
2. Information access - Except for information telating to confidential ptocesses or methods of
manufachrre, all records and reports submitted in accordance with the terms of this permit shall
be available for public inspection at the State of Alaska, Department of Environmental
Conservation, 555 Cordova Street, Anchorage, AK 99501.
3. Civil and criminal liability - Nothing in this permit shall relieve the Permittee ftom civil or
criminal penalties for noncompliance, whethet ot not such noncompliance is due to factors
beyond his control, including, but not limited to, accidents, equipment breakdowns, or labor
disputes.
4. Availability - The Permittee shall post or maintain a copy of this permit available to the public at
the disposal facility.
5. Adverse impact - The Permittee shall take all necessaty means to minimize any adverse impacts
to the receiving waters or lands tesulting from noncompliance with any limitation specified in
this permit, including any additional monitoring needed to determine the nature and impact of
the noncomplying activity. The Permittee shall clean up and restore all areas adversely impacted
by the noncompliance.
6. Cultural or paleontological resources - Should culrural or paleontological resources be
discovered as a result of this activity, wotk which would distub such resources is to be stopped,
and the State Historic Preservation Office, Division of Parks and Outdoor Reueation,
Department of Natual Resources, is to be notified immediately (907-269-8721).
7 . Applications fot renewal - In accordance with 18 AAC 15.100(d), applications for tenewal or
amendment of this permit must be made no later than 30 days beforc the expiration date of the
permit or the planned effective date of the amendment.
8. Other legal obligations - The requirements, dudes, and obligations set forth in this permit are in
addition to any requirements, duties, or obligations contahed in any permit that the Alaska
Department of Environmental Conservadon or the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has
issued or may issue to the Permittee. This permit does not relieve the Permittee from the duty
to obtain any and all necessary permits and to comply with the requirements contained i, *y
such permit ot with applicable state and fedetal laws and tegulations. All activities conducted by
the Permittee pursuant to the terms of this permit and all plans implemented by the Permittee
pursuant to the terms of this permit shall comply with all applicable state and federal laws and
regulations.
\
Kodiak Biosolids Composting
Permit #SW)(A060-20
Page 5 of 5
March 26,2075
9. Pollution prevendon - In order to prevent and minimize ptesent and future pollution, when
making management decisions that affect waste generation, the Permittee shall consider the
following order of priority options: waste soutce reduction; tecycling of waste; waste treatment;
and waste disposal.
'fhis permit expires on March 26,2020 and may be revoked ot amended in accotdance with 18 AAC
60.260. The permit can be renewed if the facility will operate beyond this date. To avoid expiration
of this permit, a renewal application must be submitted to ADEC at least 30 days before the
expiration date, as set forth in 18 AAC 15.110.
Robert J P.E.
Solid Waste &Program Manager
,\
o
Kodiak lsland Borough
Com m u nity Development Depa rtment
710 Mill Bay Rd. Rm 205
Kodiak AK 99615
Ph. (907) 486 - 9363 Fax (907) 486 - 9396
http://www. kod i a ka k. u s
Submit by Email
ilillilil1 ilIilt
Zoning Compliance Permit
TBD
Pef mit NO . Bz2o1s-081
Form
The following information is to be supplied by the Applicant:
KIB/City of Kodiak (Mark Kozak)
PO Box 1397 Kodiak, AK 99615
Property Owner I Applicant:
Mailing Address:
Phone Number:
Other Contact email, etc.:
Legal Description:
486-8060
m kozak@ city. kod ia k. ak. us
Subdv: Lot 18, KIB Landfill Subdivision B lock Lot: 1B
Stre et Ad d ress
Use & size of Existing structures: city of Kodiak composting site - operating under a temporary use license
Description of proposed Action: Establish a Class A composting facility in accordance with ADEC permits. lmprovements include a 50'
x 70'covered structure overthe mixing area, composting bins, biofilter, electrical room and office, mixing bunker, and associated site
improvements, as depicted on site plan Sheet C-3, addendum no. 4, prepared by CH2MHILL. this use is a permitted use in l-lndustrial
zo n ing
Site Plan to include: Lot bundories ond existing eosements, existing buildings, proposed locotion of new construction, occess points,
ond vehiculor porking oreos.
Staff Compliance Review:CurrentZoning: lndustrial KIBC 17.105 PROP-ID TBD
Lot Area:3.45 acres Lot Width: 75'Bld'g Height: N/A
Front Yard: 50 'Rear Yard: 20 Side Yard: 20
Prk'g Plan Rvw? Yes # of Req'd Spaces: 3
Staff Compliance Review Notes:
Plat / Subdivision Requirements? City submitted a technical memorandum addressing odor control to demonstrate compliance
w/ KIBC 17.105.060 D, which has been reviewed and approved. City has submitted application for P&Z approval of fencing, to demon-
strate compliance with KIBC 17.105.060.050 F
Subd Case No. S 1 5-01 4 Plat No.2015-7 Bld'g Permit No. TBD
t r3
too
Does the project involve
an EPA defined facility?NO
State permit # 24329 issued I 2/2/14
lf YES, do you have an EPA Return Receipt of
Notification?
"Permit will not be issued until receipt is submitted to
N/A
Driveway
Permit?
Septic Plan
Approval:
Fire
Marshall:
Porta Potty service
N/A
Applicant Certification: t hereby certify that t will comply with the provisions of the Kodiak lsland Borough Code ond that t
have the authority to certify this as the property owner, or as a reprcsentative of the property owner. I agree to have identifiable
corner markers in place for verification of building setback (yard) requirements.
Attachments?\Es List Other: S p
lr
Date: SkIk Z,tLdL*<..9,Sig natu re:
C
(
This permit is only for the proposed project as desuibed by the opplicant. lf there ore any changes to the
proposed project, including its intended use, prior to or during its siting, construction, or opetotion, contact
this office immediately to determine if further review ond opproval of the revised project is necessary.
THIS FORM DOES NOT AUTHOR'ZE CONSTRUCTION WHEN A BUILDING PERMIT IS REQUIRED.
** EXPIRATION: A zoning complionce permitwill become null and void if the building or use authorized by such permit is not
commenced withln 180 days from the date of issuonce, or if the building construction or use is abandoned at ony time, ofter the
work is commenced, for a period of 180 days. Before such work can be recommenced, a new permit must firct be obtained. (Sec.
I 06.4.4 Expi roti o n. I 997 U BC) pe r Kl BC I 7. I 5.060 A.**
CDD Staff Certification
,/k cDDStarr:Date:
Payment Verification Zoning Compliance Permit Fee Payable in Cashier's Office Room * 1O4 - Main floor of Borough Building
After-the-Fact 2X the published amount
Not Applicable
Less than 1.75 acres:
1.76 to 5.00 acres:
5.01 to 40.00 acres:
40.01 acres or more:
rr
Kr seo.oo )11R312015
' t,'tB$rm
ELAND BoRoudH
FINANCE DEPARTIITENT
rMswtrPAID
s0.00
s30.00
s60.00
rr
t-r
s0.00
s60.00
s 1 20.00
s 180.00
s240.00
o O
CITY OF KODIAK
2410 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, AK 99615
Public Works Department
(907) 486-8060 Fax: (907) 486-8066
March 27,2015
Mr. Robert Pederson, Community Development Director
710 Mill Bay Road, Room 205
Kodiak AK 99615
Subject: Title 17 .l 05.060, Odor
Dear Mr. Pederson:
During discussions with Kodiak Island Borough (KIB) Community Development Staff about the
Zoning Compliance permit for the City of Kodiak's Composting Facility, we reviewed KIB
Code, section 17.105.060, D, Odor, Item F, Open Storage and Item G Screening.
I am writing to address KIB Code 17.105.060, Item D regarding odor. The CH2MHILL
compost designer engineer has been designing composting facilities all across the country for
over 30 years and has stressed the importance of the need to complete the modeling to assure we
are managing potential odors. The design engineer required us to complete a full odor model to
determine if there were any concerns.
I have included the complete technical merno of the odor modeling, which includes the results of
that modeling. The model indicates less than 0.1 percent of the time over the course of year
(approximately t hours) that the odor would be detectable on or across the highway from the
facility.
Please let me know if you need any additional information.
Sincerely,
1111._0- eJ-
Mark Kozak
Public Works Director
Enclosure: Copy of the complete technical memo
o o
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM G}U2IIIIHILLo
Kodiak Composting Facility Odor Dispersion
Modeling -Technical Memorandum
PREPARED FOR:
PREPARED BY:
COPY TO:
DATE:
PROJECT NUMBER:
City of Kodiak
Matthew Ward and Todd Williams/CH2M HILL
CH2M HILL Project File
July LL,2OL4
479L23.03.SA.03
lntroduction
The City of Kodiak Alaska (City) is installing a composting facility at the Kodiak lsland Borough Landfill. The
facility will process municipal biosolids into Class A exceptional quality compost compliant with all U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC)
permit requirements.
The composting facility being designed has a capacity to process on average 55 cubic yards biosolids per
week. The composting process will occur in covered continuously aerated negative aeration bunkers, with
the resulting foul air stream being captured and treated using an organic media biofilter. Biofiltration has
been determined to be Best Available Control Technology (BACT)for biosolids composting in several air
pollution control districts in the United States. Because continuous aeration of compost piles will be
practiced, approximately 95o/o of all compost odors will be captured for treatment through the biofilter.
Atmospheric dispersion modeling was completed to quantify potential odor impacts due to the composting
operation on the surrounding community.
The biosolids receiving building will be used to receive biosolids cake from the City's biosolids dewatering
facility and blend it with bulking agent for composting in covered compost bunkers. Because material will be
processed through this building only intermittently and previous studies at other facilities have shown this
portion of the overall process to be a localized odor source, this building is not considered to be a potential
offsite odor impact. This technical memorandum documents the methodology and atmospheric dispersion
modeling results to predict the impact of odors emitted from the planned composting operation.
Atmospheric Dispersion Modeling
Dispersion Model Selection and Overuiew
Locations downwind of odor sources can be negatively impacted by odors. The amount of impact is
governed not only by the odor source mass emission rate but also dispersion downwind of sources. Source
geometry, terrain, wind speed and direction, solar radiation/adsorption, atmospheric mixing height, and
surface roughness all influence odor trajectory and dispersion of odors as they migrate from their source
and potentially impact people at receptor locations (such as residences or businesses) offsite. Atmospheric
dispersion models are designed to account for these influences and estimate concentration, duration, and
frequency of impacts given specified source emission data. Dispersion modeling provides an improved
understanding of the relative risk of creating offsite odor impacts caused by multiple sources acting
together.
The model selected for this assessment was AERMOD, the current U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) standard for demonstrating Clean Air Act compliance. While odor is not regulated by the Clean Air Act,
ES08l 9r 309r 6r ZATL
O o
KODIAK COMPOSTING FACILITY ODOR DISPERSION MODELING .TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
AERMOD is the industry standard used in odor-impact risk assessments. AERMOD is a Gaussian plume
model that uses the boundary layer turbulence theory to calculate pollutant mass distribution from the
plume center line. Previous industry standard models (i.e., lndustrial Source Complex Model) used empirical
relationships between pollutant mass distribution and atmospheric stability class categories. Gaussian puff
models such as CALPUFF also are commonly used to predict pollutant dispersion. However, puff models are
more suited to tracking the long-range pollutant trajectory and fate resulting from release events. AERMOD
is the most appropriate model for assessing the ongoing risk of odor impacts to receptors located near
continuously emitting sources such as composting operations. AERMOD tracks plume interaction with
terrain, accounts for building downwash (wake) effects, and has been validated for downwind impact
projections such as are relevant to this evaluation.
AERMOD (or other Gaussian plume models) has no provision for calibration in terms of adjusting a rate
parameter. The model itself is already calibrated per EPA guidance; hence model adjustment algorithms are
not allowed. As such, AERMOD's predictive accuracy is dependent on the degree to which the input data
correspond to actual conditions. ln setting up the model a rigorous effort was made to obtain input data
defining the odor sources as accurately as possible. Absolute predictive accuracy is beyond what should be
expeded or needed for odor risk assessments. Rather, the model is an excellent tool for assessing the
relative risk of offsite impacts due to different sources, source configurations, and climactic conditions. For
this evaluation, the model was set up and run using the most complete and appropriate data available. Each
model component and corresponding input database is described in the following subsection.
Dispersion Model Components and lnput Data
AERMOD coordinates several data component interaction using five ancillary pre-processing tools. Required
input components include the following:
o Sourcecharacterization
Source emission rates
Concentration pea king/averaging du ration
Source type and geometry
o Terraincharacterization
Receptor array
Digital Elevation Model (DEM) or National Elevation Dataset (NED)terrain files
o Land use characterization
Airport land use sector designations
Onsite building dimensions
o Meteorologicalcharacterization
Airport su rface meteorologica I observations
Airport upper air soundings
National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) 1-minute Automated Surface Observing System (ASOS)
observations
o Offsite odor threshold and frequency targets
Model control options
Model output options
Figure 1 illustrates the interaction between AERMOD, input data, pre-processing tools, and output results.
The following subsections describe each input component in detail.
ESOEr9r309r6rZATL 2
KODI,/AK COMPOSTING FACIUW ODOR DISPERSION MOOELING -TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
FIGURE 1
AERMOD Components Schematic lllustration
o
o
3
Digital Land Use
Cha racter astics
Airport Surface
Observations
NWS Upper Air
Soundings
Receptor
Array
DEM Terrain
Files
NCDC l-Minute
ASOS Wind Data
Land Use
Parameters
Model
Control
Options
Output
Tables,
Charts
and
Gnphs
Emission Source
tnventory
Source
Parameters
Building
Dimensions
ESOS r 9r 309r 6r ZATL
o o
KODIAK COMPOSTING FACILITY ODOR DISPERSION MODELING -TECHNICAL
Source Data lnputs
Source data must be characterized to account for odor concentration, volumetric air emissions (or
equivalent air emission rate), source geometry (source location, emitting surface area, release height, and
shape), source type, and averaging period. Odor emission rates were determined based on typical
concentrations measured from similar sources and planned process air flow rates. The following
assumptions were used to characterize odor emission rates:
o Maximum biofilter Air Flow Rate (process air plus dilution airl = 7,299 cubic feet per minute (cfm)
o Biofilter Exhaust Concentration = 300 D/T (The dilution-to-threshold ratio or D/T is a measure of the
number of dilutions needed to make the odorous ambient air "non-detectable.") This number is based
on data from similar composting operations.
o Aerated Static Pile Composting Pile and Cure Pile Odor Emission Rate = 0.27 odor unit per second per
square meter (OU/s/m'?). This is the portion of odor emissions that can escape from the negative
aeration process into the ambient surroundings. lt represents 5% of odors generated from the
composting process and is based upon testing performed at similarly designed and operated biosolids
composting facilities. The other 95o/o of emissions is directed to the biofilter for treatment.
The biofilter air emission rates are based on process air flow volume plus dilution air needed to control
biofilter inlet temperatures. The concentration is based on what has been demonstrated to be achievable at
other biosolids composting facilities. The aerated static pile unit area emission rate is based on
measurements made at a similar biosolids composting facility. The emission rate accounts for some escaping
odors with most of the odors are captured as a result of the piles being ventilated under negative pressure.
The unit area emission rate was then assigned to the operating piles.
AERMOD can model three types of odor sources: point, area, and volume. Point sources are those from
which odor emissions are released in a concentrated and localized form, such as from odor control
equipment exhaust stacks. For point sources, the release height, air vertical velocity, and temperature, must
be characterized. Volume sources are those from which odors are released in a diffuse, three-dimensional
form, such as vents or open doors on the side of a building or structure that release fugitive emissions. For
volume sources, the associated building or structure determines the plume dimensions at the point of
release. Area sources are those having a large horizontal surface from which emissions are released.
Emissions from area sources can either have an initial upward velocity, or emissions related to mass transfer
across the air/liquid or air/solid interface. Figure 2 illustrates the three source types.
For all three source types (point, area, and volume) release height is a key parameter and is based on the
source elevation and geometry. Plume dispersion is highly influenced by initial release height. For point
sources and some area sources, odor emissions have an initial upward velocity, hence the release height is
the elevation above ground level at which the odor plume begins to move horizontally with the wind. For
volume sources release height is usually one half of the associated building or structure height. The biofilter
was modeled as an area source. Since the biofilter treated air has an upward velocity and buoyancy
(because it is warmer than the ambient air), it could be modeled as a point source to account for dispersion
related to the upward velocity and air buoyancy. However, modeling as an area source is more conservative,
with respect to offsite impacts, because the area source assumption neglects plume rise. Therefore,
modeling as an area source results in higher predicted impacts compared with a point source. The covered
aerated static pile and aerated cure pile bunkers were modeled as an area source. The biosolids receiving
building was assumed to not be an offsite odor source as biosolids are not stored, but are processed as soon
as they are received, and that only 2-3 days per week.
ESOSr 9r 309r 6r ZATL 4
KODIAK COMPOSTING FACILITY ODOR DISPERSION -TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
FIGURE 2
Plume Release from Each Source Type
Point Source Area Source
Finalplume
rise helgtrt
Plume Element
Stack
height Centerline of
o
Area source impacts are determined from a
numerical integration plume elements
Volurne Source
Dornwind Plum
Viilualhint
of Release
o
I nitbl p lume d im nsiom determi ned hry sin of tre yol ume s, urue
ESOEr9r309l6rZATL
Plume centerline
O o
KODIAK COMPOSTING FACILITY ODOR DISPERSION MODELING -TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Terrain lnputs
AERMOD calculates plume interactions with topography and accounts for obstacles caused by hills, ridges,
and other steep terrain elements. Topographic elevation data were obtained from the U.S. Geological
Survey (USGS) in the form of National Elevation Dataset (NED) files for the composting site and surrounding
region.
A receptor array was defined across the site and surrounding region to account for any potential odor
impacts. Receptor density was increased near sources and spread out farther away to manage computing
resources. The receptor grid was distributed over an area approximately one mile square. When the model
was run, concentration values were calculated for every receptor for every source or group of sources for
every hour in the selected year.
Land Use lnputs
The AERMOD model considers atmospheric boundary layer turbulence associated with landscape
roughness. To characterize this roughness land use categories were ascribed to every distinct wind direction
sector. Examples include low density suburban development, open water, ruralgrassland, and high density
urban. Detailed land use data were obtained from the USGS maps.
Meteorological Data lnputs
Meteorological data were obtained from the Kodiak Benny Benson State Airport, which is the nearest
meteorological station that maintains records on all the required model input parameters. The state airport
is located approximately 5 miles southwest of the compost site on the same side of Kodiak lsland. The
airport's proximity to the site means that the airport meteorological data can be assumed to be
representative of compost site conditions for dispersion modeling purposes.
Airport surface meteorological parameters were measured and logged at hourly intervals for every hour of
the year. Airport data were preprocessed for use in AERMOD and then modeling was completed using
hourly averaging, the highest resolution typically available from airport weather stations including Kodiak.
Required surface parameters include 10-meter wind speed (measured at 10 meters from the ground), wind
direction, air temperature, solar radiation, albedo (fraction of solar radiation absorbed by the ground), and
Bowen ratio (fraction of solar radiation converted to evaporation). ln addition to surface weather
parameters, upper air data are needed to determine the atmospheric mixing height (inversion layer
elevation). These were obtained from weather balloon soundings performed twice daily by the Kodiak
airport.
Meteorological data from five recent years, 2008 to 2OL2, were screened and compared. The model was run
for each of the five years and the year with the highest resulting offsite impacts was selected. All five years
resulted in similar odor impacts, but 2010 had the highest offsite impacts and was selected for this
assessment.
The meteorological data files are as complete as possible using the latest available tools and EPA guidance
for AERMOD. Calculating the impact for each source, at every receptor, over the selected design year (2010)
gives a high probability of producing the worst-case conditions, thereby accurately projecting the relative
risk of the planned composting facility to create an offsite impact.
Offsite Odor Threshold and Frequency Targets
For dispersion modeling results to be meaningful, they should be evaluated in the context of what is
typically perceivable by the public. Whereas, odors of 1 D/T are theoretically perceivable, in the ambient
environment odors are usually not noticed above background untilthey are between approximately 5 and
tOD/T, with 7 D/T being a typicalthreshold at which the public becomes aware of odors. Many odorcontrol
practitioners indicate that odors tend to become a nuisance at 15 D/T, although the frequency that odors
are perceived, the concentration at which they are present, and the combination of frequency and
concentration determine whether the odors represents a problem. On this basis, a target value should be
selected based on the City's goals and risk sensitivity. A higher target Dfl' results in less required odor
6ESOSr 9r 309r 6r ZATL
oo
KODIAK COMPOSTING FACILITY ODOR DISPERSION MODELING -TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
control measures but greater risk of offsite odor problems. A lower target D/T results in greater controls but
less risk of offsite odor problems. Selecting a target of 1Dfi or below is not advisable as such a target is
often not attainable (or needed) at any cost. Table 1 lists offsite impact targets either successfully
implemented at other locations or dictated by local codes where they exist.
TABLE 1
Selected Odor Goals and Criteria in the United States
Location
Offsite Standard
or Guideline Averaging Time andlor Frequency
San Francisco Bay Area Air Quality Management District.
Brightwater (Seattle, Wash.) WWTP
Cincinnati (Ohio) WWTP
Colorado
Dublin San Ramon Services District, Dublin, California
EBM UD, Oakland, California
Fairfax, Virginia
Kentucky
Massachusetts
M issou ri
Nevada
New Jersey
Orange County, California
San Diego WWTP
Virginia lnitiative Plant, Hampton Roads Sanitation District
s Drr
s Dlr
7 Dlr
8 Drr
4 Dlr
s Drr
7 DlT
7 Dlr
s Drr
7Dfi
e olr
s D/r
ls Drr
s Dlr
2Dfi
7 DlT
Applied after at least 10 complaints within 90 days
5 minutes
3-min ute averag e, 99Yo com plia nce
Short-term field measurement
l-hou r, 99Yo compl iance
t hour, 99% compliance
t hour, L00% compliance, 3 minutes, 99% compliance
Short-term field measurement
t hour (Equates to about 15 Dfi for 3 minutes)
Short-term field measu rement
t hour
5 minutes or less
3 minutes
5 minutes, 99.5% compliance
t hour, L00% compliance
3 minutes, 99.9Yo compliance
WWTP = wastewater treatment plant
D/T = Dilution to threshold ratio
Based on historical experiences and current priorities, a target criterion of 7 D/T, not to be exceeded offsite
during more than one percent of the time, should represent a successful offsite odor condition from the
compost operation. At this recommended D/r offsite odor impacts are not expected.
Dispersion Modeling Results
The dispersion model was run, concentrations were calculated for each hour of the year and hours
exceeding 7 D/I were tallied for the area in the vicinity of the planned compost site extending outward in a
grid 3000 meters in every direction. The results were then converted for presentation of the threshold
criteria (offsite exceedances of 7 DIT offsite no more than one percent of the time) as an isopleth map.
Figure 3 presents odor combined impact results emitted from the planned composting operation and
biofilter.
ESOSr 9r 309r 6r ZATL 7
FIGURE 3
Projected Frequency of Exceedances of 7 D/T for the Planned Kodiak Composting Facility Due to All Sources
Combined
As shown in Figure 3 concentrations of 7 DIT or higher beyond the property boundary, slightly across the
road and not near any homes, do not occur more than 0.1 percent of hours during the year. This is about 9
hours per year. This demonstrates compliance with very rigorous offsite impact criteria and is expected to
represent successful odor control. Based on these results, for which conservative assumptions were applied,
the planned composting facility is anticipated to pose minimal risk of offsite odor impacts.
Conclusion
Atmospheric dispersion modeling was completed to evaluate the risk of causing offsite impacts with the
planned City of Kodiak Biosolids composting facility. The AERMOD model was used with local terrain and
meteorological data taken from Kodiak's State Airport. Five recent years of met data were screened and the
most conservative year (with respect to producing the highest predicted offsite concentration) was selected.
Odor source data was based on other measurements made at facilities using a similar process to the one
planned for the City. Dispersion modeling results predicted that perceptible odors would be contained
within the property boundary with a slight predicted incursion into the adjacent Monashka Bay Road far
from any residences or other potential receptors. These results indicate a minimal risk of the compost
operation causing offsite odor impacts.
99.9% compliance of 7 DIT
limit within this isopleth
99% compliance of 7 D/T
within this isooleth.
Property Bou ndary
L0O% compliance of no
morethanT DIT
outside this isopleth
ESOSI 9l 3091 6l ZATL
o o
KODIAK COMPOSTING FACILITY ODOR OISPERSION MODELING -TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
\4
I o
Permit N o.24329
State of Alaska
Department of Transportation and Public Facilities
Driveway Permit #24329
This pennit allorvs the o\\,ner lo construct and maintain a drivervay
rvithin a State on,ned highrvay Right of Way.
Design Criteria
This pcnllit applies only to the State right of way
This perrnit grants pcrmission lor a drivervay allowing access to and fronr your propemy onto a
State maintained highrvay. lt does not permit the following within thc right of way or within that
porlion of a driveu'ay that is rvithin thc right of way: ( I ) Parking of vehicles "for sale"; (2)
Obstructions of any kind (i.e. logs, cables, fencing, etc.); (3) Advertising signs or barrners/flags;
(4) Parking velricles rvith signs/adverlising on the side.
A driveu,ay construcled under pemtit rvitltirt a highrvay right-ol'-rvay is the propeny of the State,
but all cost and liability arising frorn tlte construction, operation, or maintenance of a driveway is
at the sole expense ofthose lands served.
Ou,ner:City of Kodiak
Mailing Address:2410 Mill Bay Road
Kodiak, AK 996 I 5
Driveway location (highway, address, subdivision, legaldescription milepost, etc.)
DAM Kodiak - 1203 Monashka Bay Road - MP 6.4
Composting Site - Kodiak Island Land Fill
Drivervay width 24 Feet Road surface type Paved
Left edge clearance I 200 Feet Shoulder type Gravel
Right edge clearance I 600 Feet Landing surface type Asrrhalt
Left retum radius 40 Fect Left drivervay fore slope 4: I
Right return raclius 40 Feet Right driveway fore lope 4: I
Shoulder rvidth 4 Fect Ditch depth 3Feet
Approach angle 90 Degrecs Culvefl Type Conugated Metal
Landing grade +l- 2 Percent Culven Diameter I 8 Inches
Culvefl Length 40 Feet
Page I of 5
a t
Pcrnrit N o.24329
The Department is not obligated to change its maintenance practices to accommodate a driveway
constructed under a pennit, or to incur any additional expense removing snow berms or other
obstructions from a driveway rvithin a right of way resulting from the Department's activities, or
activities under a permit issued under l7 AAC 15.
Owncr is rcsponsiblc lbr adjusting or relocating the drivervay rvithout cost or liability to the
Departnrent if the use or safety of the highrvay requires that the drivervay be adjusted or relocated.
This permit is not a property right but a tenrporary authorization, revocable by the State upon
violation of any pennit lenns or conditions, or for other reasons. All reasonable attomey's fees
and costs associated rvith legal or enforcement actions related to the tenns and conditions of this
permit will be borne by the Orvner.
Any suruey nlonument or nronument accessoly that is disturbed or destroyed during construction
or maintenance of the driveway rvill be restored or replaced by a Land Surueyor licensed in the
State of Alaska.
The Owner rvill be responsible for all necessary Federal, State, and Municipal pennits and
licenses required by law, pay all taxes and special assessments lawfully imposed upon the
permitted area, and pay other fees and charges assessed undcr applicable law.
Placement of fill material in waters of the U.S., including s,etlands and streanrs, requires prior
authorization from the U.S. Arrny Corps of Engineers. It is the responsibility of the owner to
contact the Corys before filling activities take place.
The Owner shall construct and maintain a driveway in such a manner that the highrvay, and all of
the highway's appurtenances or facilities, including drainage facilities, pipes, culvens, ditches,
traffic control dcvices, street lights, pathways, and sidewalks are not irnpaired or endangered in
any way by the construction or nrainlenance. lf you damage any inrprovements rvithin the State
owned right of way, you will be responsible for rctuming thern lo their previous condition. The
Depanmcnt rvill inspect and approve thc restored improvements.
Orvner will indernnily, defend, and hold hannless the State, and its oflicers, employees, and
contractors, from any and all claims or actions resulting fronr injury, death, loss, or darnage
sustained by any person or petsonal property rcsulting directly or indirectly from Orvner's usc of
or activities in the permitted arca.
Landings Iionr allpaved roads must bc paved and nraintained from edge of the road lo the length
of the landing as stipulated in this pcnnil.
Ila culven is requirecl by this driveway pennit, culven must be rnaintained continuously by rhe
o\\,ner.
No person sltall place, leave. ol dcposit upon any strect, avcnue. alley, sidcrvalk. or other public
-i.-l-r ^a' ^..:--...1-:-l- !--- l- --.^.1 n-- .-.- -t.'- -- - | . r'rlBllt ur \t.lJ dll)' Sllutl' ut lLs tvlllLll llds trccll tt:lll(r\gtl ll(rlll U lrllvUtC (lll\C\Valy, lrll\'itttr lrAiKlllB
area, or thc adjacent property. Os,ner is rcsponsible lbr contractor's actions concerning placenrent
of snorv frorn Orvncrrs;rropefly.
Page 2 of 5
o o
Pernrit N o. 24329
If driveway construction or maintenance interferes with the public's safety and/or use of facilities
within State owned right of way, you will be directed to stop work until adjustments are madc.
While doing construction or mainlenance activities do not park equipmenr or stockpile material
on the shoulder during non-working hours.
Owner is responsible for sight distance clearing of brush and obstructions adjacent to their
property
Contact the Department for information about acceptable driveway markers (i.e., size, materials,
distance, elc.) for placement within the right of way.
Attachments included as part of this permit are:
. Site Plans
I, Glenn Melvin, acknowledge and accepl that City of Kodiak will comply with all the provisions
and conditions that the Department of Transportation and Public Facilities has included as a
condition of issuing this permit.
/z/, /zo/{
Signature Date
DOT Date
Page 3 of 5
Permit No. 21329
stlt pt arr ').
' r, t.-
/'
-i\^^
s lt?'-
rtrr.lrralat..,\
'ta
iaarrrEf,-thl.r
ED, lrlEll I/ rJ
-r1
.rrt (ra.rlr.
o
. rra?t?illrtt!:urtt, !F:l
(rt xtl. { t
I o-
'I
't\
Itrlt-raaErat aa.al r
I
t.r, r.|F.9
v
I
I
trt
lt
l----
-r
-tE
rtL r!
q7 I
\\
r------t
t. d -.\( I " ' I '.
I I - ErtrYrrtlT
t I
Ftr'-rtt h-,
tl''. l-. -- .d'
o
a
o
tt !
tl . Itrt---
-----l
{
,r
lilr
iitr
III
Page 4 of 5
,. -t
Jil- f io, -
I
l;
It
II
thlfiI1il
fr
fi
*
Ii
It
H
ll
il
I
II
la+
ht1
t
)
I
T
-
Ir tt.?*-*-
I
I
a. aa Dr,
O.
u::?'rfr'
FZ
j
i
I
I
'
= -/--
-
I tt !. rl'lEt rLl.G
;
a
\
-a-t--
\
,
a
Permit No. 21329
o
o
Page 5 of 5
,
o o
Kozak Mark
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Mullican, Jim
Friday, March 27 , 2015 1 :1 3 PM
Kozak, Mark; Mathers, Doug
Bud.Alto@CH2M.com
RE: Composting Facility Fire Marshall Overview Document
Good Afternoon Mark,
I have reviewed the material you furnished and from the fire marshal prospective I see no problem with the
requested changes I would like to visit the site as this project proceeds to evaluate my department's response for
emergencies.
Tha n ks,
Jim
J. R. Mullicon Jr
Fire Chief
City of Kodiak Fire Dept.
2L9 Lower Mall Bay Rd.
Kodiak, AK 99615
Ph# 907-486-8040 Fax 907-486-8048
Messages to and from this *mail address may be available to the public under Kodiak CiU Code provisions and
Alaska State Statutes.
From: Kozak, Mark
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 4:32 Pl{
To: Mathers, Doug; Mullican, Jim
Cc: Bud.Alto@CH2M.com
Subject: FW: Composting Facility Fire Marshall Overview Document
Good afternoon Doug and Jim,
Attached is the updated description of the compost facility operation. It was reviewed by the Composting
engineer to make sure the information about temperature monitoring is correct. I have also included the newest
site plan. We had to make some changes in order to keep all the excavated fill within the property.
Please let us know if you have any question.
Jim, Doug has a CD disk with the full drawing package if you need to review additional drawings.
Thank you, Mark
Mark Kozak
Public Works Director
2410 Mill Bay Road
Kodiak, AK 99615
1
F;907 -486-8066
Sent: Tuesday,
To: Kozak, Mark
I have updated
.a
)
0 a
Bud
Mark
W;907
From:
Subject:
2015 9:31 AM
Fire Marshall
for the Fire
7,
2
o
O
!Bia)ai{:
'r! .t;:
t;f f
?a .i$E
t
t
€
ciz
E3!coE'E'
eJJI
=t{t
fJ
rt
5an
lIElEllD
^olorGnGrEril?[lx'rr
ncltlG!- ll E DGCl'ttltDurElllt 'lltE*:.^ili-irrrrerlf iloomrgtrrrnocE
,.
!.
p3At-
--.---------
lxllL
.. ntlE lEIl @@
r=truorasu
-o------l--Eddte grrdlod b]!rolrlo' - - - - - o -
@
occ-t--
,
a,,
aurtr0,r^vrlEtw7.
,,I
I
I
I,
,
,
,
t
I
,
I
I
I
I
rE rrlaumgl
FE)Ella
Erdclhg grrrtl rord b lrrroltita
--4L--
lrlrqEnEr|lrvDl
tfE g.EIf,ClL
rEr
turnEEr.L
ro.Alr tAYm o
oo--oOO'
xttErtlrEr.lB
Ef ]T IU
EIT
tIIIruE
o'
!'IEEffi ErllLrotL
A
E
I,-
a
a
a
t
OO
Kodiak lsland Borough
Community Development Department
7,'10 Mill Bay Rd. Rm 205
Kodiak AK 99615
Ph. (907) 486 - 9363 Fax (907) 486 - 9396
http://www. kod i a ka k. u s
Submit by Email
lil il1ilil]!ililt I]l
Zoning Compliance Permit
24084
Pef mit NO . czzo16-oss
Form
The following information is to be supplied by the Applicant
City of Kodiak
PO Box L397, Kodiak, AK 99515
Property Own er / Applicant:
Mailing Address:
Phone Number:
Other Contact email, etc.:
Legal Description:
(e07) 486-8060
Subdv: KIB Landfill Subdivision B loc k:Lot: 1B
Street Ad d ress 855 Monashka Bay Road
Use & size of Existing structures' class A composting facility
Description of Proposed Action
pla n.
Construction of an 82'x 120' compost screening and storage building as depicted on attached site
Site Plan to include: Lot boundories ond existing eosements, existing buildings, proposed locotion of new construction, occess points,
ond vehiculor porking areos.
Staff Compliance Review:Current Zoning: lndustrial KIBC 17.105 PROP_ID 24084
Lot Area 3.45 acres Lot Width 75'Bld'g Height: Unlimited
Front Ya rd: 50 Rear Yard 20 Side Yard 20'
Prk'g Plan Rvw? Not Applicable # of Req'd Spaces: 3
Staff Compliance Review Notes:
Plat / Subdivision Requirements?No change to existing off-street parking requirement.
Su bd Case No. S 1 5-01 4 Plat No.2015-7 Bld'g Permit No. TBD by Building Dept.
/I Irtl3,
I>
OO oo
Does the project involve
an EPA defined facility?
* Commerciol buildings, instollotions (militory boses),
institutions (schools, hospitols) ond residences with
more thon four H) dwelling units.
N/A
Proof of EPA notification provided (if required)?
*Required for oll demolitions, for renovations disturbing ot leost 160 squore
N/A
feet, 250 linear feet, or 35 cubic feet ol Reguloted Asbestos Containing Moteriol (RACM), ond
for renovotions thot remove o load-supporting structural member.
No permit will be issued for such projects without proof of EPA notification
YES
Driveway
Permit?
Septic Plan
Approval:
F ire
Marshall:
N/A
TBD by Building Department
Applicant Certification: I hereby certify that t will comply with the provisions of the Kodiak tsland Borough Code and that t
have the outhority to certify this as the property owner, ot os o rcpresentative of the property owner. I agree to have identifioble
corner morkers in place for verification of building setback (yard) requirements.
Attachments? Site Plan List Other: N/A
Date: May 11 ,2016 Signature: Glenn Melvin, Engineer, City of Kodiak
This permit is only for the proposed project os described by the applicont. lf there are any changes to the
proposed project, including its intended use, prior to or during its siting, construction, or operation, contoct
this office immediately to determine if further review ond approval of the revised project is necessary.
THIS FORM DOES NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION WHEN A BUILDING PERMIT IS REQUIRED.
** EXPIRATION: Any zoning complionce permit issued is subject to the same expirotion, suspension, ond revocotion provisions as a
building permit issued forthe same construction permit.**
CDD Staff Certification
Date: May 11 , 2016 CDD Staff: Jack Maker
Payment Verification Zoning Compliance Permit Fee in Cashier's 6ffice Room # 104- Main floor of Borough Building
After-the-Fact 2X the published amount
Not Applicable
Less than 1.75 acres:
1 .76 to 5.00 acres:
5.01 to 40.00 acres:
40.01 acres or more:
tr
T
E
tr
tr
s0.00
s 30.00
s60.00
se0.00
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr20.00
s0.00
s6o.0o ''" ru
s 1 20.00 \-
sl8oooPA;D
s240.00
tlAY t 1 2016
h@
SI
KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH
irnrnNcE DEPARTI,IENT
7
oo oo
NORTH
LOT 1A
PLAT#2O15-7
SCALE
LOT 1A
PLAT#201 5-7
s
oq
o
oq
q)
srU)
zo
LOT 1A
PLAT#2015-7
II
PROPOSED
Ezrr x 120FT
STRUCTURE
-Erm 3trrarr_rfiE
LOT 18
PLAT#2015-7
I
sl
5,
tril
ar,Et
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
/
(,z
hO
t-E
/
czeolL-oS(
a
'PAYMEnT DATE
05/ 11 12016
COLLECTION STATION
CASHIER
RECEIVED FROM
CITY OF KODIAK
DESCRIPTION
Kodiak Island Borough
710 Mill Bay Rd.
Kodiak, AK 99615
BATGH NO.
2016-00000459
RECEIPT NO.
2016-00001043
CASHIER
Teresa Medina
00
$60.00
O'ot
855 MONASHKA BAY RD KIB LANDFILL SUB GLENN MELVI N
Zoning Compl Zoning Compliance Permit
cz 201 6 055
Payments:Type Detail
Cash
Amount
$60.00
Customer Copy
Paoe 1 of 1
TRANSACTION AMOUNTPAYMENT CODE
Printed hv: Teresa Medina
Total Amount:
05/1 112016 08 :47 21 AM
RECEIPT DESCRIPTION
o o Submit by Email
Kodiak lsland Borough
Com munity Development Department
710 Mill Bay Rd. Rm 205
Kodiak AK 99615
Ph. (907) 486 - 9363 Fax (907) 486 - 9396
http: "w.kod ia kak.u s
lll llIllillililll Illl
2 4083
Zon ing Compliance Permit Pef mit NO . czzo18-o2e
Property Own er /Applicant:
Mailing Address:
Phone Number:
Other Contact email, etc.:
Lega I Description :
The following information is to be supplied by the Applicant:
Kodiak lsland Borough/ Matt Gandel /Bob Tucker / Dave Conrad
7L0 Mil! Bay Road
907-486-92LL
Subdv: Kodiak lsland Borough Landfill Subdivision Block Lot:1A
Street Address:L203 Monashka Bay Rd.
Use & size of Existing structures: Kodiak lsland Borough landfill and related structures. Baler facility
Description of proposed Action: Removal of existing roof and wall assemblies an dinstallation of insulated roof and wall panel
assemblies. Removal and replacement of selected doors, windows, and mechanical/electrical systems
Site Plan to include: Lot boundories ond existing eosements, existing buildings, proposed locotion of new construction, occess points,
ond vehiculor porking oreos.
Staff Compliance Review:Current Zoning: lndustrial KIBC 17.105 PROP_lD 24083
Lot Area:97 .34 acres Lot Width: 75'Bld'g Height: subject to any FAA
Front Ya rd: 50 Rear Yard: 20 Side Yard 20
Prk'g Plan Rvw? Not Applicable # of Req'd Spaces:
Staff Compliance Review Notes:
Plat / Subdivision Requirements?Site plan comes from case materials for P&Z case No. 17-010
Applicant states there' , is no asbestos material near this project. No change to footprint/mandated parking requirements.
Form
Subd Case No.Plat No.Bld'g Permit No. TBD Bldg Dept
r-\
o o aDoes the project involve
an EPA defined facility? YES
rCommerciol buildings, installotions (militory boses),
institutions (schools, hospitols) and residences with
more thon lour (4) dwelling units.
N/A
Proof of EPA notification provided (if required)?
*Required lor oll demolitions, lor renovotions disturbing ot leost 760 squore
NO
feet, 260 lineor feet, or 35 cubic leet of Reguloted Asbestos Contoining Moteriol (RACM), ond
for renovotions thot remove o lood-supporting structurol member.
No permit will be issued for such projects without proof of EPA notification
Driveway
Permit?
Septic Plan
Approval:
F ire
Marshall:TBD Bldg Dept
Applicant Certification: t hereby certify thot t will comply with the provisions of the Kodiak lslond Borough Code and thot t
hove the authority to certify this os the propefi owner, or os a representative of the property owner. I agree to have identifiable
corner markerc in place for verification of building setbock (yard) requirements.
Attachments? Site Plan List Other:
Date: Feb 22,2018 Sig natu re:
This permit is only for the proposed project as described by the applicant. lf there are any changes to the
proposed projed, including its intended use, prior to or during its siting, construction, or operation, contact
this office immediately to determine if further review and approval of the revised project is necessary.
THIS FORM DOES NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION WHEN A BUILD//NG PERMIT IS REQU IRED.
** EXPIRATION: Any zoning compliance permit issued is subject to the same expiration, suspension, ond revocation provisions os a
building permit issued for the same construction permit.**
CDD Staff Certification
Date: Feb 22,2018 CDD Staff:
Payment Verification Zoning Compliance Permit Fee in Cashier's Office Room # 104 - Main floor of Borough Building
After-the-Fact 2X the published amount
Not Applicable
Less than 1.75 acres:
1 .7 6 to 5.00 acres:
5.01 to 40.00 acres:
40.01 acres or more:
X So.oo
tr 560.00
tl S 1 2o.oo
tl S I 8o.oo
tl S24o.oo
r
n
tr
tr
B
s0.00
s30.00
s60.00
se0.00
s 1 20.00 pAln
FEB 2s ;', ;,
l(0[)lAKlUuuuu ounuuer
trlfif nftF;, trFr}.rrrti aFlt+
KOITIA,K ItrEADfD
BOROUGE
Journal Post Listing
Soft By Entry
D.F!|rd xuer ,ourd Tyr. 9n uda. G/L l,at! D.-d.n ldu latr!ff! 8ld$Iiotm ,qrrd T!r!
l2o. FnE 20t4,40016t2 lE GL 02r2!/nE Z0t$9oit"Hiodt|dll
LE tdq l!., I ll.l
G/L Date 6/L Account Number Account *scnptnn
Replacerm
Wution Source Mttturuunt WitAnptnt
o o2l23lzot8 490-566 452.150 Corufuctbn Servi:e Zonlng Conp Pernlt-Kod Landfl Baler Bldg Roof &
Wdl Replacerm
Project: 17002.5-A - Ealer Brrildng Sldirg A Rmf (49&566), C.orutnrcUon, Sidirg & Rmf con*ined
Cash h Bank - Wels Fargo Zming Cornp Pem*t-Kod tandf{l Bal€r Bldg Roof &
Wall Replacerrr
Cash h Bank - WeIs Fargo Zonirg Cdnp Pennlt-Kod tandllll Baler Bldg Roof &
Wail Replacerm
Zming Cornpliance P€nnit ZmiU Cornp Pennit-Kod Landfill Baler Edg Roof &
Wall Replacenn
Nurnber of Entnes: 4
120,00
.00
120.00
.00
.00
120.00
.m
120,00
o2l?3n0L8
aa?3l20t8
0212312018
.190 l0l.l00
t00 tol.t00
1UHX)0 322.1.t0
$240.00 t240.00
O
PAID
FEB 26 7I ,
K0tllAKluurutr ounuuu
FruAilCFneoiorrrir-
Run by Dria l-lollotvay on 0AZq20l8 l1:51:22 Al'l Page 1 of I
{ "'\ffi
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 7-F
P &Z REGULAR MEETING: SEPTEMBER 21 ,2016
o
t
o
ai
I
t
.-l t-1
a-'
t-
i
\.r lrt lf V F
')-l-/,r
I
I
I
--lL I
I I
I
-r^I lr
-
ls--/,2,3'
t
I
:\
-i-
,J,t>/t ol W-t
Atl \I )r\II
!
I I /.
t'-tlqr-l-
I
t-l €\
7r.,-,I>o -b 1 \,I
I
L
,,z.!rn t-,/,€/t ILt)),\,\LI HI /'tY'
-/
a/-t rAUE l-r l€-
-.Q2_n L-+slI'{1\
III
I-t\, t CT !}il {_J
I ,
II\C
--e --
1I
I
Case No. 17-010 Application Package
{-
H
-.t l- -Ll-.ll-
L-.--
J-l+r-
+-lq H
+1ILt_.t_I
l++
I
il*
+---r.-+
+-+-l-l 1l
_t-
-.,l_l
#
Tffi
J-I
I-I
I l-
Tffi+
I t-J
Itll_ltl_Ll-+
tt IH L
LJ Irl+I f
I
t-l I I LIJ-+
l-lll-[
!l'
t-r
tffi
TH
tH
T---r-t_J
HI -t Lil
4,1lolizr
Ta.-lse-l
11 il t-l
L
I l..L I L-L
L l.Il-l-l
{
J {-f
J-l
l_
-t-l-t_-t_t--J
ffi H-i-l-H H
t.t I t t-l -l I-
Il
't
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 7-F
P & Z REGULAR MEETING: SEPTEMBER 21 ,2016
Kodiak lsland Borough GIS Website
o
o
July 25, 2016 F;r1 4LT Lcre,u-{.or.1 . *n LE €*eaUr/rc 1:1 ,895o 0.or5 0.03 0.0€ tnl
0 0.025 0.05 0,1 km
Xrlrar lrlri SooLgllt rtd Oher
Xddt lrt.rd Ec|o(olr
Case No. 17-010 Application Package
tbgiltnrrt
a
-
t,l
,'r,
t
t\,
a
t-
ra/t/
7!
7
./
/'i',
*o!
I
r"tr \
a
/t'
7
O P & ,REG u LA- ^J,,V8fi? Etrfr [? Tii J;[
KIB lmage Overlay Map
;4 Legend
E= Subject Parcel
N
E
S
lmaqe Overlav
Feet
0 550 1 100 2,n0
Kodiak lsland Borough GIS
http://www.kodiakak.udgis (907) 486-9337
Community Development Department
This map is provided br informationalpurposes
mly and is not intended for any legal representations.
lmage Overlay
Case No. 17-010
Applicant: Kodiak lsland Borough
Agent: KIB Construction Inspector and Engineer
Request: A variance (KIBC 17 ,105.040 .A.2 and
17.195) to allow an 8' x 20' accessory building
(landfill customer service and support building) to
encroach 34' into the required l-lndustrial zoning
50' front yard setback on Lot 1A, Kodiak lsland
Borough Landfill Subdivision.
i q
Mw
Case No. 17-010 lntroduction
a
ffi N
-@,
S
/\
..--{
)
/I
;i F(r
,IS3-.i;
#
rl.\ !q x-1
Approximate Building Location Map \[;
I{$
S
bullding location
pproximate proposed
lmage Overlay
Feet
0 50 100
Legend
Proposed
Building
N
Ut't:
S
Kodiak lrland Borough GIS
http : //wvrvr. kodiaka k. us/g is (907 ) 4 86- 933 7
Corn mu n ity Development Department
Thic rnap re providad br nformetimrlpurposoc
mly and rs not rntcnded for rny lcgpl raprc!.ntatlons
O P&zO**PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 7.F
MEETING: SEPTEMBER 21, 2016
Case No. 17-010 lntroduction
t
E
.L
)5.040
esson
-l
utt
l,,i
)1 2 1 5 6
ci
UJ
Pula
Ho
Eot
J)
-
EI
=(\aI
c,o
trt
a
trt
BELT
SCALE IN FEET
0 100 200 3m
J
SILT FENCE
SEE NOTE 10
1 "4,\i
I
I
i
I
I
AS}UORGANIC SOIL
STOCKPILEAREA
\
6I
a
d.
r.lt
o
oz
'r.4
LIMTTS OF WETLAND
BEAR FET.ICE
GA]E
BEAR
SYSTEM
I Yo
L Xrbqlrt
IN
FENCE
av
5
cf2
5o
Y
BY
i6
?fi
EIx3
E
s
==EX--
s-
JJ
II
E
NIt,
9u,
Fo
(t)
IIJ UIt-'tr.Sl
Qq5o
eil
;3woZtf(o
FUI-rJJ)
Ufirf<oUA
JotuIoo
qd
6rj-z
E8o>('t llJ
2a---j-a
9,oxzru<
1'= l0O
VERIFY SCALE
ORIOML DR/NMNO.oEt'
MAR 2012DATE
PROJ 3s4Es0
DWG G3
ry
Y,
16\
.f
ao
I
/1
\
\
STAGE 1 I
FINAL CO\Eh AREA
I
/\\\/\Ea
ib\
\\I
D(ST PERIMETER ROAD I
SILT FENCE
SEE NOTE 10
I
ACTIVE
LAT.IDFILL\
\
5a
+
E,l
6
- - -/
\E.aa"'
I
I
I
l
r
/
,/ 'a
,/ t.
,/ MHFb --\--- __ _
{!i Qatz earo osrs
vg TPl(B
sl{oTRocK
STOCKPILE AREA
t Ea
+\o
\
BALER a E Ea+^!r,
Ea
*roI\
a
+e
J,t4'-'<fl.-/+'t'? 'j
\
a
LINK FENCE a
MONASHKA BAY ROAD
CHAIN LINK FENCE S]rE ENTRANCE NOTES:
1. CONTOT RS SITOWN REPRESENT THE E)(ISTTNG GROT ND SURFACE (EG) TAI(EN
FROM AERIAL PHOTOGRAPFTY DATED AI.'GUST 20, 2OIO A}.ID SUPPLEMENTED
WITH TOPOGRAPHIC FIELD SURA/EYS PERFORMED IN T.IOVEMBER 2010.
PORNONS OF THE MAP I-IAVE BE i/IODIFIED TO REFLECT APPROXIMATE SITE
COND]TIOT.IS TI{AT ARE ANTICIPATED TO E)(ST AT THE TIME OF
CONSTRUCNON.
2. ASOESIGNED CONTOURS AND FEATURES FROM THE CELL I CLEARING,
D(CAVATION, ATr{D FE}.ICING CONSTRUCTION COI.ITRACT (PT{ASE 1) }I.AVE BEEN
MERGED INTO THE BASE MAP TO REPRESEI{T D(ISTING CONDITIONS AT THE
TIME OF CELL 1 LINERAT.ID LEACI{ATE SYSTEMS CONSTRI.'CNON. }.IOTALL
PI{ASE 1 A,$zuILT CO}.ISTRUCNON FEATURES MAY BE SHOYN.I. @NTRACTOR
IS RESPOT{SIBLE FOR FIELD VERIFICATTON OF SfTE TOPOGRAPHIC A}.ID
PT.ANIMETRIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRIUCTION.
3. THE BASE iLTAP WAS COIIIIPILED BYAERGII'ETRIC, INC. FROT{ AERIAL
PHOTOORIpT{/ ACOU |RED 0&2G201 0.
4. THE MAP WAS @MPILED TO MEET HORIZONTATACCUMCY IN ACCORDAAICE
W|TH ASPRS CI.ASS IIACCURACY STAT.IDARDS.
BENCHMARKS FOR SURVEY CONTROL
5. THE MAP WAS COMPILED TO MEET VERNCALACCURACY IN A@ORDANCE WTH
ASPRS CI.AS}S I I ACCURACY STA}.IDARDS.
6. THE ]t,AP PRO,ECTION IS |'.IAD?, AIASKASTATE PI.ANE, ZONE 5, AS DGRESSED
LEGEND:
<+ KIB MATNAccESS RourES
7. VERTICAL DATA lS REFERET.ICED TO A LOCAL DATUM.
8. FOR BORING AND TEST P]T DATA SEE DWG G'I.
9. FOR LEGEND AND ABBREVIATIOT.IS SEE DRAWNG G2.
10. ANY S|LT FENCT AND CLEARTNG LTMTTS FENCE 0NSTALLED FOR CLEARTNGp(cAvATroN AND FENCTNG @NTRACT) TI{AT REMATNS AND tS tN G@D
CONDITION MAY BE RE{'SED FOR THIS CONTRACT.
NUMBER NORTHING EASTING ELEVATION
TBl 13$254.70 810612.25 160.5
TB2 1396538.49 810804.17 130.8
TB8 1395580.64 8103t7.49 246.4
TB4 1395944.81 810r/6.€240.8
TB5 1395689.11 810785.90 24'.1.3
T86 1395793.Si 811076.15 2f.2.O
TB7 1396064.99 811324.46 170.5
TB8 1393107.31 810e44.05 2U.B
SHEET 3
FILEi.IAME: Cr3003_381650.d9n PLOT DATE: Ylm12 PLOTTIME: 1:27:55 PU
3 /
I
t
a
t
.t
Jt
o
o
\
frs
tr
F^t1zr9
Eilln
E3
hil
3o
E
T
ts
B
B
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
f,{Ix
3
@czxm!Io
E{lDI
mxI
a9'
frt
I-tnt
fn
Eoi
F
!I
5.lli
H
E
f,x
-,-F zmt
3
E
P
@C!
m
tr,
i
,
H
EIz
6)
!z>i'l
EH-
1g!
H
H
frq
-t
\
+
I
I
I
r
I
I
I
I
\
\
\,
,
I
u
Eltm
3fi
Ep
m
HIqga,
Eil
\
Hlt7
frE
NH
\\
\
\\
\\\\\
\\\
\\\\\\
\\
\
t
mx.o
5'(o
(O
to
9.-ooo.
o
o
0)-o
o
o
a
,
,
,
I
I
,
t
I
,
t
,
t
I
t
,
I
-t
I
I
I
ttx>
d
F
f,
3
I
I
a
\
II
\
I
t
I
Ez'o
s
E
3v.vl
l-ot
t
C,
2
F{o
1tiFIt
mx.o
='(o
(O
a0,
9.
aq)
o.
o
aqt
-to
CN*o
\
Prfril3----
-rz
EEifl
E
Ti
IE
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ilf;7xmo{
1i
t
I
EI
it
in
int
Flni
tr,o
g
E
UIJz
GIo2
an
E
xImoo
{2o
?
TfitIo-
a
.9ofIlll
no
,
P
oo
!6
1oo
ilil!
omnl
Qico
-a
F
ffixB
8fiils3r!n
a
ffitr
EFti6t\,{*8
x
H
-a_
r
H
B
$
uc.l
I
I
TE
Ps
dI
Hrl
I5
It
\t
GH2;7il//lHlLLqp Acldendum No.4
lroTEs R8
KOOT K ArJUilOr
clrY oF x(xilAlK
corlPollnNo FAcruTY
o
SITE PLAN
crvl"
Frpirct: XDU Jrt3t0
Ororinc. lrtl 2J -C- J.Drc
Oote: rroe t 7. 2Ol5 - J:l4Pm
l{:
iJ.J,g
!)
3
3I
d_J
.i
ts-l'
0
t,.)
B
D
I,r
a
ISSUED FOR BID
a
II
@
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
- - -
\
-t'-a-_
./o/
ttlt
m
$t
HiI
iB*-
r
I
I
I
I
I
i'
I
I
I
I
I
I
L,
65-
=TIo
-wN
N)o
.-l