2012-05-10 Work Session Kodiak Island Borough
Assembly Work Session
Thursday, May 10, 2012, 7:30 p.m., Borough Conference Room
Work Sessions are informal meetings of the Assembly where Assembly members review the upcoming regular meeting agenda
packet and seek or receive information from staff. Although additional items not listed on the work session agenda are discussed
when introduced by the Mayor, Assembly, or staff, no formal action is taken at work sessions and items that require formal
Assembly action are placed on regular Assembly meeting agenda. Citizen's comments at work sessions are NOT considered part of
the official record. Citizen's comments intended for the "official record" should be made at a regular Assembly meeting.
CITIZENS' COMMENTS (Limited to Three Minutes per Speaker)
ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION
1. KIB FY2013 Budget Discussion
PACKET REVIEW
PUBLIC HEARING
Resolution No. FY2013 -01 Establishing the Minimum Amount of Funds to Be Made Available
From Local Sources for the Kodiak Island Borough School District For the Fiscal Year Beginning
July 1, 2012 and Ending June 30, 2013.
Ordinance No. FY2012 -16 Amending Various Code Sections in Title 7 Elections.
CONTRACTS
Contract No. FY2012 -20 Professional Services Agreement for Coordination /Constructability
and Code Compliance Review of the Kodiak High School Addition and Renovation Project
Design Documents.
RESOLUTIONS
*Resolution No. FY2012 -30 Disposing of Certain Borough Owned Land to the City of Kodiak
for Less Than Fair Market Value (P &Z Case 12 -031).
ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION
Ordinance No. FY2013 -01 Levying Taxes on All Taxable Real and Personal Property Within
the Kodiak Island Borough for the Expenses and Liabilities of the Kodiak Island Borough for the
Fiscal year Commencing on the First Day of July 2012 and Ending on the Thirtieth Day of June
2013 (Fiscal Year 2013 Budget).
OTHER ITEMS
*Approval of Revised Planning and Zoning Commission By -Laws.
Assembly Review of a Planning and Zoning Commission Case Recommending Denial of a
Rezone of Certain Properties Along Sharatin Road and Wilton White Way (P &Z Case 12 -022 —
Wolf, Arnold, and Breeden).
Hiring for the Position of Construction Inspector /Engineer at Salary Range 20, Step F.
MANAGER'S COMMENTS
CLERK'S COMMENTS
MAYOR'S COMMENTS
ASSEMBLY MEMBERS COMMENTS
Kodiak Island Borough
-, r! Office of the Borough Clerk
c k � . 710 Mill Bay Road
K odiak, Alaska 99615 ;Sr at 1 . ti. , Phone (907) 486 -9310 Fax (907) 486-9391
111014 664
DATE: May 8, 2012
MEMO TO: Mayor and Assembly
FROM: Nova M. Javier, MMC
RE: Election Code Follow up
This memo is provided to clarify some concerns expressed at the last regular meeting. Please
let me know if there's anything that I could research or clarify regarding this ordinance. Since
this has been reviewed by the Attorney, I would appreciate getting your comments ahead of
time so I could run them through the attorney.
7.30.125 Write -in Votes.
A. Write -in votes shall not be tallied except:
1. if a person running as a write -in candidate has, at least before 5 p.m. of the day
before the election filed a declaration of write -in candidacy on a form provided by
the clerk stating that he or she is willing to assume the office if elected and has
also filed a completed public officials financial disclosure statement with the
borough clerk; and
2. if the total number of write -in votes for an office exceeds the smallest number of
votes cast for a candidate for that office whose name is printed on the ballot.
Assembly member Stephens noted the following:
• Theoretically, if 60% votes were cast for an individual, there is a clear majority and those
votes would be disregarded unless the individual files a declaration of candidacy by the
day before the election.
Correct.
• Similar language is in the State code; however, State and Borough Elections situations
are different.
The proposed KIB code amendment would do the same which is to establish compliance
and determine the eligibility of candidates with regards to their residency, age
requirements, qualification as a voter, citizenship requirements, etc, before election day.
• This is a form of disenfranchisement.
Is this something you would the attorney to review regarding a possible
disenfranchisement of a voter?
In checking the definition of disenfranchisement, it means "to deprive of right, especially
voting: to deprive a person or organization of a privilege, immunity, or legal right,
especially the right to vote."
Section 2's intent is not to deprive anyone of their legal right to vote but to set
parameters regarding write -in candidacy and write -in votes.
• It's not a big deal to count write -ins for Borough Elections.
Hours spent on counting service area write -in votes: 5 hours
For at -large seats (Mayor, School Board, or Assembly): estimated additional time 16
hours
Assembly member Friend noted'that Section 5, bullet #2 is a little vague and could be
worked on.
A. Write -in votes shall not be tallied except:
1. if a person running as a write -in candidate has, at least before 5 p.m. of the day
before the election filed a declaration of write -in candidacy on a form provided by
the clerk stating that he or she is willing to assume the office if elected and has
also filed a completed public officials financial disclosure statement with the
borough clerk; and
2. if the total number of write -in votes for an office exceeds the smallest number of
votes cast for a candidate for that office whose name is printed on the ballot.
EXAMPLE: Three seats open, two candidates.
r
Are there any candidates who filled out Seat will be filled per
declarations of write -in candidacy at least NO KIBC 2.20.100
before 5 p.m. of the day before the (Mayor)
election?
KIBC 2.25.060
(Assembly)
a KIBC 4.15.040
(Service Area Boards)
Does the total number of write -in votes for an office
exceed the smallest number of votes cast for a candidate?
Total Votes:
John Doe 400
William Smith 300 (smallest)
Write -ins 350 (exceeds)
The above example would trigger a count of the write -ins. /
Historically, the Borough declares a person who received the highest write -in vote tallied as the
person who is elected to a vacant seat in a race even though the person has not filed a declaration
of write -in candidacy.
Generally, what happens is that the Clerk would verify the qualifications of the person elected,
locate /contact the person, offer the seat to the person, and ask whether they want to assume or
decline the seat. In many instances, we go through this laborious process and the person elected
declines to assume the seat, writes a letter of declination, the Assembly declare the seat vacant,
the Clerk advertises, and then the Assembly appoints to the "refused /vacated" seat.
KIB Section Description of Amendment
Section 2 Change of the wording "special needs" to "personal representative ". This is
to make the code consistent with the State's.
Section 3 Declaration of candidacy.
7.20.030(C5) This is to allow those running for candidacy who cannot obtain notary
services to have a postmaster attest their statement of candidacy. This was
reviewed by the Attorney in the past and it was found that Alaska Statutes
A.S. 44.50.180 allow postmasters to perform the functions of notaries.
7.20.030(E) This will allow candidates to submit their declaration of candidacy by
electronic transmission.
Section 4 Rules for counting ballots.
7.30.120 (A) Clarifies that this section would only pertain to precincts where the optical
scans or other computer -read or electronic ballot counting equipment are
not used, or in elections where write -in votes should be tallied.
Section 5 Write -in votes.
7.30.125 (A) Historically, the Borough declares a person who received the highest write -
in vote tallied as the person who is elected to a vacant seat on a race even
though the person has not filed a declaration of write -in candidacy.
Generally, what happens is that the Clerk would verify the qualifications of
the person elected, locate /contact the person, offer the seat to the person,
and ask whether they want to assume or decline the seat. In many
instances, we go through this laborious process and the person elected
declines to assume the seat, writes a letter of declination, the Assembly
would have to declare the seat vacant, the Clerk advertises, and then the
Assembly could appoint to the `refused /vacated" seat.
This section of the code would eliminate all the unnecessary work cited
above.
7.30.125 (B -E) AS 15.15.360 was amended on August 15, 2011, based on the Alaska
Supreme Court decision on the Joe Miller v. Mead Treadwell, and Lisa
Murkowski. The amendment mandates "the director of elections shall
disregard any abbreviation, misspelling, or other minor variation in the form
of the name of a candidate if the intention of the voter can be ascertained."
Although this has been historically the practice of the canvass board, this
amendment would incorporate the language in the borough code in order to
solidify the process in allowing minor variations in the spelling of write -in
candidate names to be counted for that candidate.
Section 6 Receiving Team
7.30.130 Historically, the receiving /counting team tallied write -in votes on the night of
the election after receiving all the voted materials from the precinct. In
reviewing this process, counting ballots on election night do not produce a
result since the votes /tallies still need to be verified by the Canvass Board.
This process is redundant since the canvass board would have to go
through the work of the counting team and it also makes it a very long day
for the receiving team and staff.
In checking with the members of the canvass board, they expressed their
willingness to assume the duties of counting write -in ballots.
March 19, 2012
Revised April 26, 2012 i'
Revised May 09, 2012
i V
ASSOCIATES
Mr. Kenneth W. Smith, PE ,Of PLAN CHECK PEOPLE,
Project Manager / Inspector
Kodiak Island Borough
Engineering & Facilities Dept
710 Mill Bay Rd
Kodiak, AK 99615 907- 942 -1678 (cell)
907 - 486 -9341 (vox)
ksmith@kodiakak.us
RE: Proposal for Plan Review Services for the
Kodiak High School Addition and Renovation
Dear Ken:
We propose to provide Plan Review Services including a RemedyCheck Constructability Review for the above
referenced project as follows:
1. Coordination & Constructability Review of 65% complete Construction Documents
2. Coordination & Constructability Review of 95% complete Construction Documents
3. Option for All Discipline Code Compliance Review of 95% complete Construction Documents
4. Back Check of issues found in 95% Review(s)
We guarantee to find our clients a minimum of three times our fee in change orders that can be prevented when
providing a RemedyCheck Review, so you can't really lose. Our record, however, has been to save them an average
of 10 to 30 times our fee. Our job is to make you look good and your life easier during construction!
A. Based on the following information, our fee will be:
• 1 Back 2 Back Chk (if
Service Review Fee Chk required) TOTAL
95% CD Coordination /Constructability - $44,987 $8,997 $4,499 $58,483
95% CD Code Compliance $63,760 $12,752 $6,376 $82,888
Grand Totals $108,747 $21,749 $10,875 ,$141,371
" ' - 65% Package 451
Estimated Construction Cost $61,500,000 - No. Of °
95 4 Package 474
• - - - - Sheets: (Estimated 5%
Cost per Sheet for Constructability $95 _ , increase)
15 business days for each ConstructabilitylCoordination Review
Time Req'd for Initial Reviews: Add 5 business days for concurrent Code Review @ 95% CD
Note: All documents listed for submittal, signed Agreement and retainer (minimum 35% for all non - governmental
agencies) must all be received prior to start of review(s). Piecemeal submittals slow down the process and
time line listed above for review will no longer be valid.
KodiakJB KodakHSRev wpd
_; ... THE PLAN CHECK PEOPLE - .<.. - ....
3419 E Chapman Ave • Suite 480 ❖ Orange, California 92869 • 714 -538 -0933 4 877- 730 -0933 ? www.pcassoc.com
The process shall include:
Task 1: PC Associates shall be supplied with the following:
a. Four (4) complete sets of half size hard copy progress plans
b. One (1) hard copy set of specifications
c. One (1) electronic copy of plans and specs (PDF format) on CD or uploaded to our FTP site. Single
files of all drawing sheet PDFs by discipline are preferred to individual sheet files. Specifications may
be a single file (preferred) or by sections. Contact Judy Williams, judy@pcassoc.com, for uploading
instructions.
d. One (1) electronic or hard copy of the soils report (applicable for new construction /additions).
e. One (1) electronic or hard copy of occupancy /exiting /allowable area calculations, structural calculations,
energy calculations, etc are required for Code Compliance Reviews.
For 95% Review to be effective, all plans, elevations, sections and details must have notes /keynotes, all
schedules in all disciplines must be completed, framing, foundations, piping and ductwork must be sized,
electrical plans must be circuited, all details must be keyed in and master specifications must be edited for
the specific project.
Task 2: Evaluation of the plans and other data shall produce a report (with space for responses by Design Architect
and /or Engineers) accompanied by a marked -up set of documents indicating areas requiring additional
information, revisions, corrections, coordination and clarifications. An electronic copy of the Report (in Excel
2003 format) and the marked up electronic documents shall be downloadable from our FTP site for
distribution. A hard copy of the Report is available upon request.
Task 3: A follow -up Resolution Check (back check) between PC Associates and Design Architect and /or Engineers
shall be held to review resolutions to the findings of the original review. This task will be performed via
detailed response comments in the electronic copy of the Review Booklet, uploads to our FTP site,
overnight mailing services, tele- conferences and /or email. We find this process to be highly effective and
eliminates the need for expensive travel and face to face meeting costs.
When all issues have been resolved to the satisfaction of PC Associates, a letter for Recommendation of
Approval will be issued to the client and /or governing agency. In case of a difference of opinion in the
interpretation of the code compliance, PC Associates will request an opinion from the governing agency and
defer to that opinion.
Task 4: All Deferred Approval items will be reviewed for code compliance during construction as an extra service
and at our standard hourly rates.
B. Progress payment shall be made in lump sums for each phase for each project. Invoices will be sent as follows:
Completion of Task 1 & start of Task 2 50% of Progress Review Fees
Completion of Task 2 for each Review 50% balance of Progress Review Fees
Completion of Task 3 100% of Resolution Check Fee for that submittal
C. Time required for Completion of Work under Task 2 outlined in this Proposal in the Table in Section "A" shall be
from the date of Task 1 and receipt by PC Associates of a fully executed Service Agreement. It shall be
understood that time is of the essence and effort shall be made to complete the work as quickly as possible.
D. All applicable requirements of California and Alaska State Contract Law shall be made a part of this Proposal.
E. If either party becomes involved in litigation, mediation or arbitration arising out of this Proposal and Agreement,
or the performance of this Agreement, the court or arbitration tribunal in such litigation, mediation or arbitration,
or in a separate action, shall award attorney's fees for and costs to the prevailing party. The attorney's fees and
costs awarded by the court or arbitration tribunal shall be computed in accordance with actual costs.
Koaiakl B_Kod[akHSRev wpd
THE P LAN'CHECK PEOPL "'E + '" 'tn'', ' k I "
3419 E Chapman Ave h Suite 480 O Orange, California 92869++ 714 -538 -0933 d 877 -730 -0933 d www.pcassoc.com
F. PC Associates maintains a workmen's compensation insurance and general business (with auto coverage) liability
policy of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00). We also carry professional liability coverage with a limit of one million
dollars ($1,000,000) specifically for plan review services and reports.
G. PC Associates is a certified woman -owned business and has maintained that status since May 1990 when certified
by Caltrans as a woman -owned business enterprise (W BE). We are also certified nationally by NW BOC as both
a woman owned business and a small business enterprise. Our certificate no. is RCPS9214. Plan Check
Associates Inc. dba PC Associates is a California Corporation. Our Federal Tax ID No. is 27- 3133734.
H. Our services represent our opinion of the Interdisciplinary Coordination and Constructability and /or Code
Compliance of a project based on our general review of the drawings and specifications. In making a general
review, some detail items requiring further action will be identified. It should be recognized, however, that other
items may exist which we will not be able to identify specifically. Our review is not intended to preempt the
technical or professional responsibility of the project design consultants in any way and does not represent a
warranty or guarantee on our part that other coordination or code compliance problems do not exist. Our job is
to find discrepancies within the contract documents, but not to decide which information is correct. That decision
is the prerogative of the Design Architect.
We look forward to working with you. Let me know how you wish to proceed.
Respectfully ,ours,
/ Accepted by:
Michelle . Pettit, AIA Printed Name & Title:
President
michelle • Icassoc.com
Date:
KodiakJB_KadiakHSRev.wpd
•
• THE PLAN CHECK PEOPLE • ,..
3419 E Chapman Ave C. Suite 480 + Orange, California 92869 + 714 - 538 -0933 + 877 - 730 -0933 + www.pcassoc.com
A OF 1
U : : A 0, 7
.
BUILDING ;1IEPART_MENT
19 AS 710 MILL BAY ROAD, ROOM 208
KODIAK, ALASKA 99615
drnathers@city.kodiak.ak.us TELEPHONE 907 - 486 -8070
thanscn a, city.kodiak.ak.us 907- 486 -8072
FAX 907 -486 -8071
5/9/2012
Regarding: Kodiak High School Addition and Renovation
This department has reviewed PC Associates proposal dated, May 9, 2012 for
Plan Review services of the Kodiak High School Addition and Renovation and an
example of one of their plan reviews. The Building Department has determined
that the review service is equal to the building department's professional plan
reviewer and can be used to satisfy section 107.3 Examination of Documents of
the 2009 International Building Code. .
Doug M s ��
City of Kodiak
Building Official
Kodiak Island Borough
"c
Office of the Borough Clerk
710 Mill Bay Road
• d' raid Kodiak, Alaska 99615
Phone (907) 486 -9310 Fax (907) 486 -9391
DATE: April 12, 2012
MEMO TO: KIB Assembly
FROM: Nova M. Javier, MMC
RE: Manager Hiring — Revise imeline
This is to give you an update regarding the Manager hiring process. As of today, I have sent
out 44 application packets and I have received 17 back. The deadline to submit applications is
Friday, May 25. This position will be advertised for about seven weeks.
Below is the revised timeline for your review.
Date Task Who?
Friday, May 25 Application Deadline N/A
Wednesday, May 30 Initial screening of applications Assembly
Pick Top 10
First Cut of Applicants
Week of June 4 Recruitment packets Assembly
(Schedule a special Rating sheets distribution
work session)
Week of June 11 Send out follow up questionnaire Clerk/Human
• Resource
Week of June 18 Answers to follow up questionnaire returned
Week of June 25 Full Assembly review of finalists and Assembly
questionnaire/
Narrow number of finalists for interview
Second Cut of Applicants
July 16 — July 30 Interview of Finalists Full Assembly
August 6 Make final selection, make offer, negotiate salary, Assign
benefits, and contract terms
➢ Note that the above timeline is very ambitious. Please review and provide feedback to the
Clerk about your goals.
➢ Initially you requested that I screen the applications and you may want to reconsider that
because of the highlighted text below.
"A combination of education, training, and experience may be substituted for
the required education when the applicant possesses a,demonstrated ability."
➢ I attached the following confidential documents to this memo for your review and
possible revision.
o Rating Form
o Follow Up Questionnaire
o Interview Questions
KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH
ASSEMBLY WORK SESSION
ASSEMBLY ATTENDANCE
Work Session of: A / ID at
Please PRINT your name Please PRINT your name
iht ,, , ,_4 .-.
\i e. C.0160C \i o -CJ a li-or
C�,Cn ■ "�iC �w
Leiwkii 0-14,1-(4-2 _ , }
c,;
e Cfra cC la , {> �.
o C ='U
fa
( 4W I� N5j
vktlwm
y t
r 9 /
*, .. sl
C� v *kA
Did anyone attend via teleconference? Yes No
Member (s) who attended via teleconference:
KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH
WORK SESSION
Work Session of: «Ql tb, r2(
Please PRINT your name Please PRINT your ! e
\ XAk--Q-A b 5clit \ S4
rte%, C
cl-P4 A (A r( Mk nrinrt LA <IN\ -
cJ \ n ' t(5 - - z i nc S;.�5h A_ \•,
/1 N
t ltu.a:i) (ditee9-----;
t--1 v
- ' i \ C / e \W iVi - r
, , ...,,,A_Atiganytaii-c-____„„
V -%,„
zi,ml
< L , ax(r
��} y// ( «/7
-�$- Kodiak e
Colle
g
UNIVERSITY of ALASKA ANCHORAGE
c P
k5 A ."2 x Sn i le" *&,nw j ` -,. ttte47 0,
, s r a Budget Expenditu r s „,x,Difference?',r-
Tutors , Student Coaches, Learning Center G7�S�3
Tutors and Stretch (Prep) Courses $7,000.00 $13,745.63 $j 6b0.63
+a£ x . +E � ^+E1
r��_ __,a_ „ .
Students 48 First Time Freshman (Fall
semester only) 38 High School Scholarships
(both Fall and Spring semesters) College
level degree seeking students with "C" or $57,000.00 $57,263.00 $263.00
above. (Not enough funding for First Time
Freshman for Spring Semester.
` �T� k." °r t" ''' aTestingli ., ..
Accuplacer
(69 High School Placement Testing $1,000.00 $1,950.00 $950.00
rrbP at $15 each) ,,y.
3 Q8 E %GED+ *�o � �. iti N, _.....�o `" zs°�? ;sr
e.P .tea
Main Elementary Adult ESL /GED classes 25
sessions at 3 levels, 3 teachers total 375 $2,000.00 $6,937.12 $3,137.12
hours.
° �Senior, Ce teClasses P
Computer students served 28, continuing
students 13 $5,000.00 $6,937.12 $1,937.12
/ go 32. 4
TOTALS $72,000.00 $86,832.87 $)4,831787
5/10/2012
Adult Basic Education /General Education Development
There is an ever increasing need for ABE /GED instruction and testing services. The state under funds this
program each year, requiring the college to make up the difference. In Kodiak we are continuing to
educated our English as a Second Language Learners (ESL) to prepare them for GED testing.
New Funding Request: $9,000.00
Computer Classes at Senior Citizens Center
This is an onsite support computer class at the Kodiak Senior Center. Introduction to Windows,
Keyboarding, E -mail, Word, File Organizing, Desktop Management & Publishing, Photo Shop, Internet
access and on -line travel which provides opportunities for Kodiak Senior Citizens to learn new skills. This
important service strengthens families and quality of life. Research shows new learning staves off
dementia and Alzheimer's disease. We provide instructors to teach onsite classes at the Senior Center
such as computer and English class (eg. writing and film)
New Funding Request: $2,000.00
FY12 Future Funding Request from Kodiak Island Borough
Kodiak College is requesting additional funding from the Kodiak Island Borough in the amount of
$105,000.00 for FY13 to maintain the current level of service and increase slightly those programs that
have shown the most success. With more students choosing to stay on island to begin their college
experience and contributing to the island economy, Kodiak College with your support can ensure that
our students have a successful college experience.
Funding from UAA Boroughs
$75,000 Kodiak
$100,000 MatSu
$637,570 KPC
$875,000 PWSCC - Valdez
We thank the Kodiak Island Borough and Kodiak Island Borough Assembly for your continued support.
5/10/12
Jumpstart /Scholarships
This program provides a reduced tuition for High School and (FTF) First Time Students who enroll in
college classes. In FY12 students paid $50.00 per credit vs. the $135.00 regular tuition. The requested
Borough Funding covered the remaining $85.00 per credit. Of 20 classes taught 7 qualify as Tech Prep.
New Funding Request: $2,500.00
Student Success — Second Semester
Student Success strategies were implemented in FY12 to improve college readiness and the likelihood of
success in college courses. The program provided a student orientation, a success coach, and study skills
classes for new students. This program is classified under the Jumpstart funding. Students who
successfully complete their first semester with a "C" or better in each class would be eligible for an
extension of funding for their second semester. The Program would be expanded to include summer
term. We were unable to continue this program for First Time Freshman due to the need of funding
increases in other programs like ABE, Tutoring and Accuplacer testing costs.
New Funding Request: $10,000.00
Tutors in Learning Center and Computer Lab
The Learning Center, which offers tutoring in Math, English, Science and other disciplines is available to
all students including high school, middle school, home school, and adult learners.
New Funding Request: $5,000.00
Accuplacer Tests
Accuplacer testing is required for placement in all Math and English classes in UA colleges and Lower 48.
Tests were provided at no charge for 130 high school students @ $15 per student. Five college advisors
met with high school students and counselors over a week's time to receive college advising.
New Funding Request: $1000.00
KODIAK COLLEGE DATA ROUNDTABLE
April 17, 2012
MEAN STUDENT AGE, SELECTED ACADEMIC YEARS
Academic Mean
50
43.1 Year Age
45 AY 05 -06 43.1
•
40 35:2 LAY 09 -10 35.2
AY 04 -05 33.9 AY 10 -11 33.9
35 • 31.7 _
•
30 AY 09 -10 AY 11 -12 31.7
AY 10 -11
25 AY 11 - 17 _
20
15
10
5
0
Sp Fall SP F0ll Sp Fall Sp Fall 7 Sp Fall Sp
2007 2007 2008 2008 2009 2009 2010 2010 2011 2011 2012
•
Total Headcount 718 624 773 638 726 590 814 729 902 911 1034
Credit Hours 2572 2450 3075 2411 2798 2082 3143 2682 3754 3216 4202
FTE Total - 168 158.6 194.3 136.3 173.3 132.1 192.9 170.3 239.2 218 271.9
Enrolled/ courses 1219 1186 1358 1135 1272 1057 1407 1251 1538 1501 1666
Full -time Students 42 60 60 50 43 43 57 48 52 59 59
•
•
KODIAK COLLEGE DATA ROUNDTABLE
April 17, 2012
STUDENT CREDIT HOURS SCHs b DELIVERY METHOD, SPRING SEMESTERS, 2005 throu• h 2012
2005 2006 2 5008 2009 2019 2011 2012
Face -to -Face 1266.2 1656.0 1435.0 1783.0 1574.0 1654.0 1429.0 1416.0
e- Learning 0.0 18.0 68.0 232.0 270.0 570.0 1475.0 1901.0
Dual Credit 632.0 634.0 777.0 774.0 615.0 476.0 504.0 642.0
Open Lab 135.0 174.0 106.0 103.0 106.0 87.0 32.0 0.0
Brokered 150.0 76.0 4.0 187.0 166.0 242.0 86.0 82.0
Dir Study /intern 31.0 5.0 18.0 26.0 18.0 16.0 44.0 30.0
Non- Credit 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Other 41.0 39.0
TOTAL TERM . 2214.2 2651.0 2438.0 3105.0 2749.0 3045.0 3570.0 4110.0
STUDENT CREDIT HOURS by DELIVER METHOD, SPRING SEMESTERS
/ 190L0
/ 1475.0
232.0 570.0
18.0 -1 270.0
0.0 rt xl ��, � • e- Leaming
1656 1
I a
o Face -to -Face
2 * � I 1 ■all others
/ 948.1111977.0 935 . 1 .1091 111605 8 1 ■ 793.1
t I _ 666:11
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
STUDENT CREDIT HOURS by DELIVER METHOD, SPRING SEMESTERS
tee- Learning
-Face-to-Face
- ' ..a11 others
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012