2011-10-27 Work Session Kodiak Island Borough
Assembly Work Session
Thursday, October 27, 2011, 7:30 p.m., Borough Conference Room
Work Sessions are informal meetings of the Assembly where Assembly members review the upcoming regular meeting agenda
packet and seek or receive information from staff. Although additional items not listed on the work session agenda are discussed
when introduced by the Mayor, Assembly, or staff, no formal action is taken at work sessions and items that require formal
Assembly action are placed on regular Assembly meeting agenda. Citizen's comments at work sessions are NOT considered part of
the official record. Citizen's comments intended for the "official record" should be made at a regular Assembly meeting.
CITIZENS' COMMENTS (Limited to Three Minutes per Speaker)
ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION
1. Solid Waste Advisory Board Update
2. Fisheries Update From Trevor Brown
3. Discussion Regarding the Fisheries Analyst /Consultant
4. Assembly Benefits Overview
5. Fund Review - Service Areas
PACKET REVIEW
PUBLIC HEARING — None.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS — None.
NEW BUSINESS
REORGANIZATION OF THE KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ASSEMBLY
Election of Deputy Presiding Officer.
CONTRACTS — None.
RESOLUTIONS — None.
ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION
Ordinance No. FY2012 -11 Amending Title 3 Revenue and Finance Chapter 3.55 Transient
Accommodations Tax Section 3.55.025 Allocation of Sales Tax Proceeds.
Ordinance No. FY2012 -12 Repealing Sections of Ordinance No. FY2007 -09 Authorizing an
Amendment to the Borough's Participation Agreement With the Public Employees Retirement
System (PERS) of Alaska and to Change the Borough Code of Ordinances to Exclude
Participation of Elected Officials.
OTHER ITEMS
*Declaring a Seat on the Monashka Bay Road Service Area Board Vacant.
*Declaring a Seat on the Solid Waste Advisory Board Vacant.
*Declaring a Seat on the Kodiak Workforce Regional Advisory Council Vacant.
Mayoral Appointments of Assembly Member Representatives to Boards and Committees.
MANAGER'S COMMENTS
CLERK'S COMMENTS
MAYOR'S COMMENTS
ASSEMBLY MEMBERS COMMENTS
42_,
�k z" - Kodiak Island Borough
w .'/ y Office of the Borough Mayor and Assembly
' e 710 Mill Bay Road
. Kodiak, Alaska 99615
-----1 '11.--74:2- ' :,.
1 }-- Phone (907) 486 -9310 Fax (907) 486 -9391
M
DATE: 04/08/2010
MEMO TO: Solid Waste Advisory Board
FROM: Borough Mayor and Assembly Q
RE: Goals /Projects/Tasks for the S 8
We, the borough mayor and assembly, extend our gratitude for your input and
recommendations to the Solid Waste policy and program directions for the Kodiak Island
Borough. Now that the solid waste collection contract is ready to be awarded, we would like to
refer to the Board the following items for discussions.
Public Outreach and Education
1. Responsible handling of waste 2. Diversion efforts
a. New system, rules, options, and fees a. Reduce - facts - methods
b. How to avoid bear issues b. Reuse - construction debris, bulking
c. Define and instruct how to dispose of: agent for compost, etc., etc.
i. Furniture /appliances c. Recycle - the last resort - cost in
ii. Yard waste Kodiak
iii. Bulky items
iv. Household and commercial
hazardous waste
v. Electronics /batteries, etc.
vi. Commercial waste
vii. Construction debris
The above mentioned are short- term /immediate tasks for the Board. If you have any other
topics that you would like to embark upon, you need to come to an Assembly work session
and request that the task be added to the work scope. The Assembly will consider whether the
task is within the scope of the Board and if it is an immediate priority. Staff time is very limited
right now and the Assembly is directing staff to not use time for any tasks that do not appear
on the above list.
At this time, the landfill expansion is under contract with an engineering firm that is negotiating
what can be done with the EPA and DEC. These regulatory agencies will dictate what must be
done. When we have the plans to review, we can then determine the available options. Until
then, there is no value in spending time on this matter. Similarly, the site /locations of the
transfer station(s) will be in the hands of the Planning and Zoning Commission and the design
of the actual stations is an Architectural Review Board matter. We can provide input at their
meetings but these items do not need SWAB meeting time right now.
_ We continue to count on your partnership in making positive and practical changes on matters
affecting solid waste handling in the Kodiak community. We will be looking forward for your
recommendations.
Jessica Kilborn
Subject: FW: Ordinance No. FY2012 -09 - Boards, Committees, and Commissions Reestablishment
Original Message
From: Sandra.W.West @uscg.mil fmailto :Sandra.W.Westlauscg.mill
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 8:42 AM
To: Nova Javier; Woody Koning
Subject: FW: Ordinance No. FY2012 -09 - Boards, Committees, and Commissions Reestablishment
Hello Nova,
I have been part of the SWAB committee. I do NOT feel there is a need for the continued existence of the
SWAB board.
Every meeting we begin by reading the Mission Statement:
"To assist and advise the Borough Assembly in identifying solutions to solid waste management by collecting
and reporting varied viewpoints, sponsoring public outreach, and developing specific projects with a focus on
waste reduction, reuse and recycling."
!have not seen much evidence of the board sponsoring public outreach nor developing projects with a focus
on waste reduction, reuse, and recycling. There are members of the board who do work on this mission but
the rules of meeting, public awareness, and the restrictions hinder rather than assist. The use of staff time and
efforts may be better used elsewhere.
Being open and public is a great thing for government. Individuals and unofficial groups can be just as effective
in the community encouraging waste reduction, reuse, and recycling.
Thank you,
Sandra West
P.W. PUT
1
Jessica Kilborn
Subject: FW: Ordinance No. FY2012 -09 - Boards, Committees, and Commissions Reestablishment
From: Cindy Harrington fmailto:cindyh@alaska.coml
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 9:07 PM
To: Nova Javier
Subject: Re: Ordinance No. FY2012 -09 - Boards, Committees, and Commissions Reestablishment
Hello Nova,
Thank you for this opportunity to comment on the operation of the Solid Waste Advisory Board (SWAB) with regard to
Ordinance No. FY2012 -09 as stated below.
I have been a member of the SWAB since 2008. On review of the SWAB By -Laws, Mission Statement, and the
operational Memo from the Borough Mayor and Assembly dated 4/8/10, it is clear that the SWAB is not effectively
executing its assigned roles and responsibilities. The Assembly and residents are engaged in extensive and
comprehensive decisions for solid waste management. It is evident from my experience of the past year that a direct
line of communication between the KIB Assembly and residents is critical at this time.
I request that the Assembly does not re- establish SWAB.
Respectfully Submitted,
Cindy Harrington
On 10/10/2011 11:28 AM, Nova Javier wrote:
Hello everyone,
The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly will hold a public hearing on Thursday, October 20 on Ordinance No.
FY2012 -09 titled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE ASSEMBLY OF THE KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH REESTABLISHING
BOARDS, COMMITTEES, AND COMMISSIONS AS ESTABLISHED IN THE KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH
CODE OF ORDINANCES TITLE 2 ADMINISTRATION AND PERSONNEL CHAPTER 2.100 BOARDS,
COMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS
All boards, committees, and commissions established under Title 2, Chapter 2.100 of the Kodiak Island
Borough Code of Ordinances, with the exception of those mandated by law, shall terminate by operation of law
every three years, unless affirmatively re- established or continued by the Assembly.
The Assembly shall hold a public hearing to receive testimony on the need for the continued existence of the
board, committee, or commission from the general public and members of the board, committee, or
commission.
The following boards, committees, and commissions that are on list for reestablishment:
Chapter 2.15 Personnel Advisory Board
Chapter 2.110 Emergency Services Council
Chapter 2.115 Kodiak Economic Development Commission
Chapter 2.120 Parks and Recreation Committee
Chapter 2.125 Architectural /Engineering Review Board
Chapter 2.145 Solid Waste Advisory Board
Chapter 2.150 Fisheries and Oceanic Research Board
Chapter 2.155 Kodiak Workforce Regional Advisory Council
'
Alaska Board of Fisheries
Work Session — Agenda Change Records
October 4 -5, 2011, Anchorage
PRELIMINARY ACTIONS
F 1. Return Kodiak Area bag limits for rockfish back to pre -2011 limits, of 10 rockfish daily
with 20 in possession; no size limit. (5 AAC 65.022(7) )
F 2. Close sport fishing for king salmon in the Black River and tributaries in the Yukon River
drainage. (5 AAC 73.010)
*N /A 3. Request Board to adopt statewide definition of anchor rollers into regulation. (5 AAC
39.105(x)) ( *a board generated proposal to adopt a statewide definition of anchor rollers
into regulation will be submitted at the March 20 -23, 2012 Statewide Board of Fisheries
Meeting)
N/A 4. Close sport fishing for king salmon in the Black River and tributaries in the Yukon River
drainage. (5 AAC 73.010)
N/A 5. Correct errors in regulation from 2011 Upper Cook Inlet meeting. (5 AAC 21.353)
C 6. Amend the maximum allowable harvest in Norton Sound red Icing crab fishery to align
with revised harvest rates based on recent population model. (5 AAC 34,915)
7. Amend pot limits based on new guideline harvest levels in Registration Area J Tanner
crab fishery. (5 AAC 35.525(c)(1))
F 8. Amend various aspects of the management plan for Kenai River late -run king salmon to
achieve the biological escapement goal. (5 AAC 21.359)
C 9. Increase total allowable catch in the Aleutian Islands golden king crab fishery due to lack
of adoption of new stock assessment model by crab plan team. (5 AAC 34.612)
C 10. Amend registration requirements in Bristol Bay salmon fishery to include electronic
submission of registration and re- registration via the web. (5 AAC 06.370)
*C�Carried, F— Failed, T= Tabled, C /A= Carried as amended, N /A =No Action
Agenda Change Requests 3, 6, 9, and 10 will be considered during the March 20 -23, 2012
Statewide Board of Fisheries Meeting in Anchorage Alaska at the Hilton Hotel.
Prepared by Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Boards Support Section. 10/13/11
•
•
•
ALASKA BOARD OF FISHERIES
October 6 -10, 2011
PACIFIC COD FOR PRINCE WILLIAM SOUND, COOK INLET, KODIAK, CHIGNIK
AND SOUTH ALASKA PENINSULA AREAS
PRELIMINARY ACTIONS
Gulf of Alaska Pacific Cod (2)
N/A 1. Review licensing and reporting requirements for parallel Pacific cod fisheries for
coordination with federal Pacific cod fisheries. (No authority)
N/A 2. Require federal LLP license and observer when participating in a parallel Pacific cod
fishery. (No authority)
Kodiak Pacific Cod (6)
C/A 3. Develop regulations to coordinate state and federal Pacific cod fisheries in the Kodiak Area.
(Amended with substitute language set forth in RC 30 as amended)
N/A 4. Address harvest overage in state - waters Pacific cod pot fishery.
N/A 5. Allow only jig gear onboard a registered state- waters Pacific cod jig vessel.
N/A 6. Cap jig vessels 58 feet and larger to 10 percent of the state - waters Pacific cod jig allocation.
N/A 7. Cap jig vessels over 58 feet to 25 percent of the state - waters Pacific cod jig allocation.
C 8. Amend regulatory description of Kodiak groundfish area and districts.
Chignik Pacific Cod (8)
C/A 9. • Develop regulations to coordinate state and federal Pacific cod fisheries in the Chignik
Area. (Amended with substitute language set forth in RC 32 as amended)
N/A 10. Open the state- waters Pacific cod season seven days after federal Gulf of Alaska Pacific
cod season closes.
N/A 11. Open the state - waters Pacific cod season one week after federal Pacific cod season closes.
N/A 12. Open the state - waters Pacific cod season one week after federal Pacific cod season closes,
or March 1, whichever is earlier.
N/A 14. Establish 14 -day stand -down period for vessels using pot gear in a Pacific cod fishery prior
to registering for the Chignik state - waters Pacific cod season.
N/A 15. Reduce pot limit in state- waters Pacific cod fishery.
N/A 16. Establish daily fishing period for Pacific cod fishery.
C 17. Amend regulatory description of Chignik groundfish area and districts.
Chignik and South Alaska Peninsula Pacific Cod (1)
N/A 18. Implement 7 -day stand -down for vessels that fished Pacific cod in the BS -AI Area before
registering for the Chignik or South Alaska Peninsula state- waters Pacific cod fisheries.
7
South Alaska Peninsula Pacific Cod (15)
C/A 19. Develop regulations to coordinate state and federal Pacific cod fisheries in the South
Alaska Peninsula. (Amended with substitute language set forth in RC 33 as amended)
N/A 20. Open state - waters Pacific cod season seven days after federal Western Gulf of Alaska A
season Pacific cod pot sector closes.
N/A 21. Open state - waters Pacific cod season on March 1, or seven days after federal Gulf of
Alaska Pacific cod pot sector closes, whichever is later.
N/A 22. Open state - waters Pacific cod season on March 15, or seven days after federal Western
Gulf of Alaska Pacific cod pot sector closes if that closure is later than March 15.
N/A 23. Establish regulatory allocation for mechanical jigging machine gear in the state- waters
Pacific cod fishery.
N/A 24. Establish regulatory allocation of 25 percent for state- waters Pacific cod jig fishery.
N/A 25. Establish regulatory allocation of 30 percent for state - waters Pacific cod mechanical jig
fishery.
N/A 26. Establish regulatory allocation of 50 percent for state - waters Pacific cod jig fishery.
N/A 27. Establish regulatory allocation of 50 percent for state - waters Pacific cod jig fishery.
N/A 28, Establish regulatory allocation of 50 percent for state - waters Pacific cod jig fishery.
N/A 29. Establish regulatory allocation of 50 percent for state- waters Pacific cod jig fishery.
N/A 30. Establish regulatory allocation of 50 percent for state - waters Pacific cod jig fishery.
N/A 31. Establish regulatory allocation of 50 percent for state - waters Pacific cod jig fishery.
C 32. Repeal one definition of mechanical jigging machine gear.
C 33. Amend regulatory description of South Alaska Peninsula groundfish district and sections,
Prince William Sound (6)
•
N/A 34. Allocate the state- waters Pacific cod guideline harvest level.
N/A 35. Establish a specific sector allocation for the jig fishery in PWS.
N/A 36. Allow only vessels without a federal Pacific cod endorsement to participate in the state -
waters Pacific cod fishery. (No authority)
N/A 37. Require that Pacific cod from other areas be landed before a vessel participates in the state -
waters Pacific cod fishery.
N/A 38. Amend opening date of the state - waters Pacific cod season. .
C/A 39. Develop regulations governing the state - waters Prince William Sound Pacific cod fishery.
(Amended substitute language set forth in RC 34 as amended.)
Cook Inlet (3)
N/A 40. Reallocate state - waters season guideline harvest level.
N/A 41. Amend the opening date for state- waters season.
C/A 42. Develop regulations governing the state - waters Cook Inlet Pacific cod fishery. (Amended
substitute language set forth in RC 39.)
*C= Carried, F= Failed, T= Tabled, C /A= Carried as amended, N /A =No Action
Prepared by Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Boards Support Section 10/13/11
Observer
Restructuring
In October, the Council reviewed the draft proposed preamble and regulations, developed by
NMFS, stemming from the Council's October 2010 action to restructure the North Pacific
observer program (BSAI Am. 86 /GOA Am. 76). Upon review, the Council deemed the proposed
final regulations, which clearly and directly flow from the Council's review of the draft regulatory
package, to be necessary and appropriate in accordance with section 303(c) of the MSA.
The Council also reviewed an Observer Advisory Committee (OAC) report, which provided
recommendations to the Council on the draft proposed regulatory package. The Council
recommended that NMFS address several of the issues highlighted in the OAC report prior to
publishing the proposed rule in early 2012. These issues center on revising language in the
preamble that discusses the potential use of electronic monitoring in the 40' to 57.5' halibut and
sablefish IFQ sector and the process for receiving a 'release' from observer coverage
requirements from NMFS on a case by case basis. In addition, the Council asked NMFS to
evaluate the regulations to ensure that IFQ vessels that belong in the vessel selection pool are
properly identified for inclusion in the sampling frame on an annual basis, and to continue to
work toward providing a receipt of observer program fees to fishermen for each trip (as opposed
to only providing a receipt to processors and IFQ registered buyers, who are responsible for
submitting the fee).
The Council also approved sending two letters: 1) to the Alaska Fisheries Science Center, to
support internal NMFS funding for EM development and staff; and 2) to NOAA, to again request
start-up funds for the restructured observer program (to fund year -1 deployment).
Finally, the Council requested that the agency provide a progress report on observer program
restructuring in April 2012, with specific information to be included in the annual sampling and
deployment plan each fall that is pertinent primarily to those operators in the vessel selection
pool (fixed gear groundfish and halibut vessels 40' — 57.5'). The Council also urged NMFS to
make as many EM systems available as possible to vessels in the vessel selection pool, within
identified data, budgetary, and logistical constraints, as an alternative monitoring tool.
The Council's action in October allows NMFS to move forward with the development of the
proposed rule and regulations to meet the scheduled goal of publication in early 2012. However,
the schedule and rulemaking package assumes that Federal start-up funding will be obtained to
pay for deployment in the first year of the new program (2013). Absent Federal funding, NMFS
would need to develop further regulations to collect the observer ex- vessel fee from industry the
year prior to deployment under the new program, which would necessarily delay
implementation.
The Chair also stated its intent to add an observer representative on the OAC. Please
submit letters of interest to the Council office by November 28.
GOA D =Season
Pollock
The Council reviewed a discussion paper on issues involved in redistributing pollock TAC from
the D- season to the A -, B -, and C- seasons on the GOA. Any reallocation of TAC likely will
require formal consultation under Section 7 of the ESA to ensure the action does not result in
findings of Jeopardy or Adverse Modification for Steller sea lions. The Council requested an
expanded discussion paper to examine alternative methods of apportioning pollock TAC in the
Western and Central GOA to improve the fishery and protect Chinook salmon. The discussion
paper would include Chinook salmon bycatch data from 2011 and a summary of current Steller
sea lion telemetry data from the Western and Central GOA. Staff contact is Steve MacLean.
Halibut Issues
Catch Sharing Plan
At this meeting, NMFS informed the Council that it would need to revisit its proposed Area
2C /3A halibut catch sharing plan (CSP), citing policy and technical issues which compromise
their ability to proceed to a final rule. Specifically, NMFS requested additional Council input on
the following three concerns, along with other technical issues that may be identified by NMFS
after further review:
(1) Evaluation of the management implications at lower levels of abundance;
(2) Economic impacts of the CSP under all potential combined catch levels; and,
(3) Methods for calculating the average weight for guided angler fish (GAF) that may be leased
from commercial IFQ operators, and the specific means for tracking and reporting GAF.
NMFS also strongly encouraged the Council to schedule time at the December 2011 Council
meeting to provide guidance to the International Pacific Halibut Commission (IPHC) for actions
on the specific allocation and management measures appropriate for the charter halibut
fisheries in Southeast and Southcentral Alaska for 2012. The IPHC meets in Anchorage in
January 2012 to set fishing levels and management measures for halibut along the Pacific
Coast. The Council also requested that NMFS provide additional detail in December regarding
perceived deficiencies in the CSP, so that the Council can discuss an appropriate course of
action, including the process and timing to address the concerns identified by NMFS. For
December 2011, the Council also had previously scheduled 1) a review of the ADF &G
estimates of sport halibut data for 2010; 2) review committee recommendations to consider
alternative management measures under Tier 1 of the charter halibut CSP.
Contact Jane DiCosimo for more information.
Gulf of Alaska Bycatch Limit
The Council reviewed an initial draft of an analysis that examined proposed changes, which
were adopted for consideration by the Council in June 2011, to the management of commercial
groundfish fisheries in the Gulf of Alaska (GOA) through the 2012/2013 harvest specifications
process. In addition to the No Action Alternative, the Council had analyzed a range of proposed
reductions of (a) 5 percent, (b) 10 percent, and (c) 15 percent for the trawl halibut PSC limits
and fixed gear halibut PSC limits. Additional suboptions addressed effects on trawl halibut PSC
limit apportionments.
The Council decided instead to consider an amendment to the GOA Groundfish FMP in order to
set GOA halibut PSC limits in federal regulations, as is the case under the BSAI Groundfish
FMP. The Council modified its problem statement and suite of alternatives for action and
included it under this new management action. One change to the proposed alternatives for
analysis was breaking out the hook - and -line catcher - processor sector from the catcher - vessel
sector for proposed reductions to halibut PSC limits. The Council noted that the CP sector has
achieved significant savings in halibut PSC reductions and halibut discard mortality rates and
that severe reductions may be needed to see benefits to the halibut stock. The Council
requested discussion of the benefits and impacts of modifying both seasonal and fishery
apportionments of halibut PSC limits for the deep water and shallow water complexes. The
Council requested a number of other additions to the analysis, to the extent practicable, and
identified a timeline so that the proposed action could be implemented in 2013. Initial review will
be scheduled for
February 2012 and final action will be scheduled for April 2012. Jane DiCosimo is the Council
contact for this action.
Electronic Data
Reporting
The Council reviewed an analysis of alternatives to modify the crab fishery economic data
reports (crab EDR). The Council's purpose and need statement — adopted at its April 2011
meeting— states that the action is intended to address data inaccuracies, redundancy of the
crab EDR with other data collections, and the cost of the program. Alternatives to meet this
purpose and need would revise the collection of some data elements and eliminate the
collection of others. While the Council recommended the release of the document for public
review, it also requested several changes to the analysis. First, the Council adopted an option
for analysis that would eliminate the blind formatting of the EDR data, which is intended to
protect confidentiality of submitters. Under the current rule, a third party manages EDR data,
providing it to analysts in a format that does not reveal the submitters' identities. The Council
specifically requested that the analysis of the removal of blind formatting examine the potential
for inadvertent releases of data that could arise as a result of the distribution to analysts of data
identifying the submitter. The Council also adopted a variety of revisions recommended by its
advisory panel, in many cases to increase the contrast between the two action alternatives. An
additional option advanced by the Council would provide for the collection of all unique crew
contracts and settlement sheets in the fishery to aid the Council in understanding changes in
crew compensation arising under the rationalization program. The Council also directed staff to
revise the alternatives for catcher processors to collect elements consistent with those of
catcher vessels and processors, in the event that a catcher processor makes deliveries to a
processor or receives deliveries from a catcher vessel. The Council also requested that the
analysis address any relevant comments and information from the recent review of the program
by the Council for Independent Experts. That review is expected to be released in two parts: the
first part by the 7th of October and the second part by the 15th of October. The Council also
requested staff to include in the analysis information and recommendations concerning any
potential improvements in the accuracy and informative nature of elements collected under the
status quo that might allow for their inclusion in the proposed action alternatives. This item is
currently scheduled for final action at the Council's December meeting. Staff contact is Mark
Fina.
ra,::'; �,..�.':;� - = =o ;�. a ti . 1 •. - oo.a'; .. - r . , -�, ;_, }F,� ...
December 5.13, 2011 January 30 - February 7, 2012 March 26 - April 3, 2012
Anchorage, AK Seattle, WA Anchorage, AK
SOPP: Review and Approve
SSL CIE: Review Terms of Reference EFH Consulation process: Review
Halibut Subsistence: Update IPHC Report
Halibut Bycatch in BC and West Coast: Report (T) Halibut Migration Model review; workshop report: Review
Sport Halibut 2010 Catch: Update
Halibut CSP: Review Committee Report and Disc Paper;
Discuss 2012 fishery 8 CSP deficiencies
GOA Halibut PSC: Initial Review GOA Halibut PSC: Final Action
GOA Pacific cod A- season opening dates: Discussion paper
GOA P.cod Jig Fishery Management: Report on BOF action;
Discuss next steps GOA Pollock D- season. Discussion paper
Salmon FMP: Final Action Northern Bering Sea Research: Discussion paper
CQE in Area 48: Final Action HalibuVsablefish WC changes: Discussion paper
HalibuVsablefish IFQ Leasing prohibition: Discussion paper
GOA Chinook Bycatch All Trawl Fisheries: Discussion Paper BSAI Chum Salmon Bycatch: Initial Review
GOA Flatfish Trawl Sweep Modifications: Initial Review GOA Flatfish Trawl Sweep Modifications: Final Action
BSAI Flatfish specification flexibility: Discussion Paper
FLL Vessel Replacement: Initial Review FLL Vessel Replacement Final Action Grenadiers: Discussion paper
AFA Vessel Replacement GOA Sideboards: Discussion Paper (7)
Crab EDR Revisions: Final Action
Pribilof BKC Rebuilding Plan: Final Action
BSAI Crab: Report from stakeholders BSAI Tanner Crab rebuilding plan: Preliminary Review BSAI Tanner Crab rebuilding plan: Initial Review
Deep Sea Coral Research: Report HAPC - Skate sites: Initial Review HAPC - Skate sites: Final Action
ITEMS BELOW FOR FUTURE MEETINGS
BS Habitat Conservation Area Boundary: Review BBRKC spawning area/fishery effects: Updated Disc paper (T) Crab PSC numbers to weight: Discussion paper
Crab bycatch limits in BSAI groundfish fisheries
Groundfish SAFE Report: Adopt final harvest specifications Groundfish PSEIS: Discuss schedule Al P.cod Processing Sideboards: Initial Review
Greenland turbot allocation: Discussion paper
VMS use and requirements: Discussion paper
BSAI halibut PSC limit: Discussion paper
Halibut mortality on trawlers EFP: Review /Approve (7) GOA comprehensive halibut bycatch amendments: Disc paper
B5 FLL GOA cod sideboards: Discussion paper
MPA Nominations: Discuss and consider nominations
Al - Aleutian Islands GKC - Golden King Crab Future Meeting Dates and Locations
AFA - American Fisheries Act GHL - Guideline Harvest Level December 5-13, 2011 - Hilton Hotel, Anchorage
BiOp - Biological Opinion HAPC - Habitat Areas of Particular Concern January 30- February 7, 2012 - Renaissance Hotel, Seattle
BSAI - Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands IFQ - Individual Fishing Quota March 26 -April 3, 2012 - Hilton Hotel, Anchorage
BKC - Blue King Crab IBQ - Individual Bycatch Quota June 4 -12, 2012 - Best Western, Kodiak
BOF - Board of Fisheries MPA - Marine Protected Area October 1 -9, 2012 - Hilton Hotel, Anchorage
COE - Community Quota Entity PSEIS - Programmatic Suplimental lmpact Statement December 3-11, 2012 - Anchorage
COQ - Community Development Quota PSC - Prohibited Species Catch
EDR - Economic Data Reporting RKC - Red King Crab
EFP - Exempted Fishing Permit ROFR - Right of First Refusal
EIS - Environmental Impact Statement SSC - Scientific and Statistical Committee
EFH - Essential Fish Habitat SAFE - Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation
FLL - Freezer longliners SSL - Steller Sea Lion (7) Tentatively scheduled
P• GOA- Gulf of Alaska TAC - Total Allowable Catch
PROPOSED BY: Buck Laukitis (HQ -FI1 -375)
PROPOSAL 3 - 5 AAC 28.467. Kodiak Area Pacific Cod Management Plan. Develop
regulations to coordinate state and federal Pacific cod fisheries as follows:
Regulatory provisions to address may include:
• State - waters and parallel fishery season opening and closing dates for pot and jig vessels.
• Area registration.
• Landing requirements.
• Gear storage requirements.
• Guideline harvest level (GHL) rollover and GI -IL clean -up provisions.
ISSUE: This proposal is a placeholder proposal to allow commercial state - waters Pacific cod
fishery stakeholders an opportunity to coordinate aspects of the Kodiak Area state - waters Pacific
cod fishery with newly restructured federal /parallel Pacific cod fisheries. Draft regulatory language
will be developed following release and analysis of federal rulemaking on Pacific cod sector splits
occurs.
WHAT WILL HAPPEN IF NOTHING IS DONE? Conflicting regulations regarding state -
waters and parallel Pacific cod fisheries.
WILL THE QUALITY OF THE RESOURCE HARVESTED OR PRODUCTS PRODUCED
BE IMPROVED? No.
WHO IS LIKELY TO BENEFIT? Commercial state waters Pacific cod fishery stakeholders.
WHO IS LIKELY TO SUFFER? Unknown.
OTHER SOLUTIONS CONSIDERED? None.
PROPOSED BY: Alaska Department of Fish and Game (HQ -FI 1 -363)
************************************************ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
PROPOSAL 4 - 5 AAC 28.467. Kodiak Area Pacific Cod Management Plan. Address
harvest overage in state - waters Pacific cod Pot Fishery as follows:
There are two approaches to this problem. First. divorce the allocations so that the overages to the
pot fleet are not subtracted from the jig allocation (this is our preferred solution). Or second,
address the management precision of the pot season.
There are a number of different ways to address the management precision of the pot fleet. Fishing
could be slowed by reducing fishing time, reducing pot limits, or implementing trip limits. Another
approach could be reserving a portion of the pot quota for the fall when fishing is slower.
3
ISSUE: Overage of the state waters Pacific cod pot fishery is unfairly subtracted from the state
waters Pacific cod jig allocation.
In the Kodiak Area Pacific cod management plan, 12.5% of the Central Gulf of Alaska
Allowable Biological Catch (ABC). is given to the state (a)(2). Out of this, the management plan
states that the jig fleet is allocated 50% and the pot fleet is allocated the other 50 %. The pot gear
season is often very quick, lasting 2 -3 weeks and the department's management prediction is
plus or minus 10 %. When the pot fleet overharvests their allocation, the overage is subtracted
from the jig fleet allocation so that the department can manage the overall allocation. This
situation is unfair, and the jig fleet requests that the Board slow this piece of the pot season so
that fisheries are managed closer to their allocations.
WHAT WILL HAPPEN IF NOTHING IS DONE? Jig fleet will continue to lose fishing
opportunity.
WILL THE QUALITY OF THE RESOURCE HARVESTED OR PRODUCTS
PRODUCED BE IMPROVED? No.
WHO IS LIKELY TO BENEFIT? Jig fishermen.
WHO IS LIKELY TO SUFFER? No one.
OTHER SOLUTIONS CONSIDERED? None.
PROPOSED BY: Alaska Jig Association (HQ -F1 1 -351)
******************************************** * * *,. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
PROPOSAL 5 - 5 AAC 28.430. Lawful gear for Kodiak Area. Allow only jig gear onboard
a registered state- waters Pacific cod jig vessel as follows:
(g) while participating in the Kodiak Area state waters jig fishery, no ground fishing gear should be
allowed onboard the vessel other than jig gear (i.e., no pot, trawl, or longline gear allowed
onboard).
ISSUE: Vessels using illegal gear during the commercial jig Kodiak Area Pacific cod fishery.
Vessels with pot, longline, and trawl gear onboard are currently allowed to participate in the
fishery. To avoid potential abuse, only jig gear should be allowed onboard the vessel while they
are registered to jig.
WHAT WILL HAPPEN IF NOTHING IS DONE? Potential illegal fishing with little ability
to enforce.
WILL THE QUALITY OF THE RESOURCE HARVESTED OR PRODUCTS
PRODUCED BE IMPROVED? No.
4
WHO IS LIKELY TO BENEFIT? Jig fishermen.
WHO IS LIKELY TO SUFFER? No one.
OTHER SOLUTIONS CONSIDERED? None.
PROPOSED BY: Alaska Jig Association (HQ -F11 -352)
PROPOSAL 6 - 5 AAC 28.467. Kodiak Area Pacific Cod Management Plan. Cap jig
vessels 58 feet and larger to 10 percent of the state- waters Pacific cod jig allocation as follows:
Cap the large jig vessels (vessels 58 feet and over) to their historical high harvest (10 %) in the
Kodiak Area.
ISSUE: In the Kodiak Area, large jig vessels (58 feet and over) taking a larger percentage of the
jig GHL that has historically been a smaller vessel fishery.
WHAT WILL HAPPEN IF NOTHING IS DONE? Smaller vessels will continue to lose
fishing opportunity. Potential future Kodiak state waters state seasons may close earlier due to
larger vessels out competing the smaller fleet. These larger vessels are able to work in more
inclement weather and further offshore. This problem will be exacerbated if state -water seasons
adopt "reverse parallel" concepts currently being discussed by the North Pacific Fisheries
Management Council.
WILL THE QUALITY OF THE RESOURCE HARVESTED OR PRODUCTS
PRODUCED BE IMPROVED? No.
WHO IS LIKELY TO BENEFIT? Small jig vessels.
WHO IS LIKELY TO SUFFER? Large vessels participating in the jig fishery.
OTHER SOLUTIONS CONSIDERED? None.
PROPOSED BY: Alaska Jig Association (HQ-F11-353)
*********************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
PROPOSAL 7 - 5 AAC 28.537. Chignik Area Pacific Cod Management Plan; 5 AAC
28.577. South Alaska Peninsula Area Pacific Cod Management Plan. Cap jig vessels over 58
feet to 25 percent of the state - waters Pacific cod jig allocation as follows:
As in the state Pacific cod pot fishery in Chignik and South Peninsula areas there is a 58 ft limit
on the size of vessels that can fish there . Kodiak has a fleet of every size. The solution 1 prefer
would be as in the Kodiak state pot season the vessels over 58 ft would be restricted to 25% of
the Jig quota. This would not eliminate anyone from the fishery and allow enough quota for
larger vessels.
5
ISSUE: With the short Kodiak federal Pacific cod seasons in January this opens the state waters
Pacific cod around the end of January when the weather isn't at its nicest. There is a slow influx
of boats over 58 ft in to the Kodiak state Pacific cod jig fishery. If this continues larger vessels
who are able to fish in rougher weather taking more of the quota while smaller boats are
weathered out. I believe this was intended by the state to be a small vessel entry level fishery.
WHAT WILL HAPPEN IF NOTHING IS DONE? The small boat fleet will lose quota to the
larger boats. A person looking to get into the fishery would think twice about investing in a small
vessel to get started fishing knowing the larger vessels could take a large portion of the quota so
fast making it not profitable to get in.
WILL THE QUALITY OF THE RESOURCE HARVESTED OR PRODUCTS
PRODUCED BE IMPROVED? This would reduce the danger to smaller boats fishing in
rough weather which improves quality of fish landed. It would slow down the fishery because
each vessel size will know how much quota is left to each group.
WHO IS LIKELY TO BENEFIT? In the Kodiak state pot cod season the over 58 ft vessel
size has not caught over the 25% as far as I know. The small boat fleet will benefit by knowing
how much quota they can harvest and that the large vessels are capped at 25% and won't have to
compete in bad weather.
WHO IS LIKELY TO SUFFER? I don't know if anyone would suffer, I think giving each
group of vessel size a fair percentage of fish to catch would stabilize a growing problem.
OTHER SOLUTIONS CONSIDERED? There are other proposals written that don't seem fair
to all vessel sizes.
PROPOSED BY: Ronald G Thompson (HQ -Fl 1 -355)
*********************************************** ***** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ***
PROPOSAL 8 - 5 AAC 28.400. Description of Kodiak Area; and 5 AAC 28.404. Description
of Kodiak Area Districts. Amend regulatory description of Kodiak groundfish area and districts as
follows:
5 AAC 28.400. Description of Kodiak Area
The Kodiak Area consists of all waters of Alaska south of a line extending east from
Cape Douglas along 58° 51.10' N. long., west of 149° 00.00' W. long., and east of a
line extending south from the Alaska Peninsula (near Kilokak Rocks) along 156°
20.22' W. long. [( 58° 51.10' N. LAT.), WEST OF 149° W. LONG., NORTH OF 55°
30.00' N. LAT., AND EAST OF A LINE EXTENDING SOUTH FROM THE
SOUTHERN ENTRANCE OF IMUYA BAY NEAR KILOKAK ROCKS (156° 20.22'
W. LONG.)].
5 AAC 28.404. Description of Kodiak Area Districts.
6
(e) Southwest District: all waters of Olga and Alitak Bays and all waters of the
Kodiak Area southwest of' Kodiak island, south of 57° N. lat., and west of 154° W. long
however, not including waters of the Mainland District.
(1) Westside District: all waters of the Kodiak Area on the west side of Kodiak
Island, south of 58° N. lat., north of 57° N. lat., west of 153° W. long., and east of a line
extending through Shelikof Strait from a point at 58° 51.10' N. lat., 152° 50.00' W. long., to a
point at 56° 37.00' N. lat., 156° 20.22' W. long. [, BUT NOT INCLUDING THE WA FLRS OF
THE MAINLAND DISTRICT.]
ISSUE: As commercial groundfish regulations develop over time, demarcation lines within and
between management areas sometimes change independent of each other. The intent of this
proposal is to standardize demarcation lines across commercial groundfish fisheries, as well as
update demarcation coordinates to reflect the best precision afforded by current technology.
WHAT WILL HAPPEN IF NOTHING IS DONE? Continued use of ambiguous demarcation
lines.
WILL THE QUALITY OF THE RESOURCE HARVESTED OR PRODUCTS PRODUCED
BE IMPROVED? No.
WHO IS LIKELY TO BENEFIT? Fishermen, fishery managers, and law enforcement.
WHO IS LIKELY TO SUFFER? No one.
OTHER SOLUTIONS CONSIDERED? None.
PROPOSED BY: Alaska Department of Fish and Game (HQ - F11 - 360)
PROPOSAL 9 - 5 AAC 28.537. Chignik Area Pacific Cod Management Plan. Develop
regulations to coordinate state and federal Pacific cod Fisheries as follows:
Regulatory provisions to address may include:
• State - waters and parallel fishery season opening and closing dates for pot and jig vessels.
• Area registration.
• Landing requirements.
• Gear storage requirements.
• Guideline harvest level (GHL) rollover and GI -IL clean -up provisions.
ISSUE: This proposal is a placeholder proposal to allow commercial state - waters Pacific cod
fishery stakeholders an opportunity to coordinate aspects of the Chignik Area state - waters Pacific
cod fishery with newly restructured federal /parallel Pacific cod fisheries. Draft regulatory language
will be developed following release and analysis of federal rulemaking on Pacific cod sector splits
occurs.
7
j am; Kodiak Island Borough
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kodiak Island Borough Mayor and Assembly
THROUGH: Rick Gifford, Borough Manager
FROM: Karleton Short, Finance Director
SUBJECT: Review of Borough Mayor and Assembly
member benefits
DATE: October 27, 2011
This memo is to inform the Borough Mayor and Assembly members of their benefits as
elected officials of the Kodiak Island Borough.
All elected officials are covered by travel insurance with a benefit of $500,000
should you die while on Borough business. The beneficiary form should be kept up to
date.
All elected officials are covered under our workers compensation policy if you are
injured while performing your duties as an elected official.
Participation in the Public Employees Retirement Plan (PERS) is available if you
are qualified under state law.
Assembly members receive a monthly stipend of $300.00 and this is paid
quarterly.
The Borough Mayor receives a monthly stipend of $500.00 and this is paid
quarterly.
At this time Aetna is reviewing whether or not elected officials can participate in
our health insurance plan.
For new Assembly members, a W -4 form, worker's compensation form, travel insurance
beneficiary form, and direct deposit form need to be completed and returned to the Finance
Department, Payroll office. These forms are available in the Payroll office. These forms can also
be mailed or emailed, but they need to be completed and returned to the Payroll office within 30
days.
j 1
ior fra Kodiak Island Borough
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kodiak Island Borough Mayor and Assembly
THROUGH: Rick Gifford, Borough Manager JW.
FROM: Karleton Short, Finance Director l <
SUBJECT: Review of Road, Fire and Lighting Are s
DATE: October 27, 2011
This memo is to provide an overview of the road, fire, and lighting area funds.
There are four road service areas in the Borough. These are the Womens Bay Road Service
Area, Service Area No 1, Monashka Bay Road Service Area and Bay View Road Service Area.
Here are some statistics of these road service areas.
Womens Bay Monaska Bay
Road Service Service Area Road Service Bayview Road
Area No 1 Area Service Area
Miles of Road 12 11 2 1
Fund Balance at 6/30/2011 121,193 433,704 3,386 (5,708)
Revenues
Property Taxes $ 134,332 $ 340,589 $ 52,842 $ 10,830
Annual Use Permit 27,600 - - -
Interest Earnings 800 3,903 58 (11)
162,732 344,492 52,900 10,819
Expenditures
Personnel Services 2,255 6,544 - -
Snow Removal /Sanding 64,964 160,889 17,159 7,345
Repairs & Maintenance 85,551 153,252 34,054 -
Grading /Ditching 24,475 34,155 1,737 586
Support Goods & Services 556 7,414 939 289
175,546 355,710 53,889 8,220
Net Income $ (12,814) $ (11,218) $ (989) $ 2,599
Cost Per Mile $ 14,629 $ 32,337 $ 26,945 $ 8,220
Reserve in years 0.69 1.22 0.06 (0.69)
Mill Rate 2.50 1.50 2.50 1.50
Assessed Value 56,306,359 220,207,599 21,978,170 7,219,867
There are three fire areas in the Borough. These are some of the statistics for these fire
protection areas.
Fire Protection Womens Bay Airport Fire
Area No. 1 Fire Area Area
Revenues
Property Taxes $ 484,639 $ 69,772 $ 14,361
State Grants - 4,144 -
Interest Earnings 8,793 2,553 236
Instruction /space rent /other 18,505 16,955 -
Operating Transfers in - 13,747 -
511,937 107,171 14,597
Expenditures
Salaries & stipends 146,162 762 -
Contracted Services - 13,790 -
Support Goods & Services 175,557 83,938 18
Capital Outlay 17,253 - -
Operating Transfers 1,469,609 - 13,765
1,808,581 98,490 13,783
Net Income $ (1,296,644) $ 8,681 $ 814
Fund Balance @ 6/30/2011 (308,404) 330,887 34,963
Assessed value 323,844,435 56,306,359 11,488,489
Cost in mills 5.58 1.75 1.20
Recently Bayside Fire Department completed their new addition at a cost of $2,143,409. This
project was financed with Bayside Fire Departments fund balance and a $300,000 loan from the
Facilities Department. This loan will be paid off on July 1, 2012.
There are no people living in the Airport Fire Area. This service area contracts with the
Womens Bay Fire Department to provide fire protection services.
There are two lighting areas in the Borough. These are the Woodland Acres Street Lighting
Area and the Trinity Acres Street Lighting Area.
The Woodland Acres Street Lighting Area was created by Ordinance 91 -11. It is governed by a 3
member board appointed by the Assembly. They held their last meeting March 15, 2000.
2
As you can see by the attached map street lights were installed in half of the service area but
then work stopped. We believe that some of the people living in this area do not know they are
living in a street lighting area.
Woodland Acres Trinity Acres Street
Street Lighting Area Lighting Area
Revenues
Property Taxes $ 10,498 $ 5,291
State Grants - -
Interest Earnings 123 73
10,621 5,364
Expenditures
Electricty 5,288 1,834
Contracted Services - -
Support Goods & Services 14 -
Capital Outlay - -
Operating Transfers - -
5,302 1,834
Net Income $ 5,319 $ 3,530
Fund Balance @ 6/30/2011 17,938 10,827
Funds available in years 3.38 5.90
Assessed Value 421,465 105,814
Cost in Mills 0.13 0.33
Mill Rate 0.25 0.50
If you have any more questions please let me know.
3
I
.___
r ..o *ii.i. --"--- IT 1 ) "l ' '" fL ' : ' '' '- ,• '" ,11 • 1 -1 ?
'
' A ' `• .---- ---.--- , • ...V A• • .
e . i t 7 ,7.• -4 AI , . ,
Woodland Acres Street Light Service Area ,.. 1 ;
,..., :, Iv, • . I f'. O 1 •••' •
, -if Ic
• 4 '
Igi Kdik Isan
ld Borough GIS
;• •
w :194).: oa
E TM1 •om•I•4 kr ••••••■•m••••••o
innn
0
Legend
0 Street Ughts httpJAwnv kocliaksk usicrs (O7}488.333
. 1 120 250 500
■ ••■
. . /1.
4 .1 I ahi I
1 , ' 1. • .. To n Y 1 ' ' .
, N ■ ,. • . ,
.4,4 , 4.. ,
. " : . .. i . . ....:. . ' . - . . -'41. '
t ; ;. ..4 '- 1 • " - -.-. . ' ' .`-/' 11- I li
: 1 '4 SINVICIA/90 ['Minden I 4, i
■ Lot Lines ..8 Alb \
- '
. : ' - •
• 4 ,,.... ' ,„ . t' - , ' 41.; .I '?":' T.,C AO:.
411 , -, IS m. t‘' Ale . . 4.1r, ,.
A .)-.. 4 ,:
7,,,,tt •
,,,,&*4 ' •.? ., s
ir :1 • s .14 .. 't '...-‘,, _ . -
J ., . . "Itic,... /r• ' n' t '. .4 . j ' ' ' ' . 1 .r .) •ir yi.• ° I)
-‘ • .$ '4
Y • .... ' ril*: •C ! ' r . /' , 4 116. • /
k • •04, . ,, OP
. IP ' -•."*-- . \ s tio\si c° 2 • ' ' • 1 • •
74 ,-• 0, , .4 4 i.
.44
- l• I iX , • e , li hk., =-- ,
• .P.i ‘i •/ i
f.i.r. . 4 :1; t414111 : 1k‘ t : . 'I
oi.C. 4 1 y r•Jfi . , • 411, . •••4. i .*
4r f A • )' '' ,Ase \ ,
• • , , i 1 ,,,, •• , . .. ., .1 ."-'' - . ...a •
• 1
, 11.. ...g-
• e-?- ' 41.14‘ . .
. -
. . . r. . ;4i .$
..„ ...,. ,.:,.. ...ft !.• "" ,..
. .
ai l . • 4 4421 ..-Ne
GP' A. '-. , ' . ,,,e . • X .....•
I 1 f , :1•"" , -. • " P - 4 4,C - 4 '
,,_
' Al.- ••••• • 4. " . • • 41 r 1114 : t'%'' ..1,: ' 1 ' \ • . ." 4,
.. . ft 4$*
r
$ ,
, i,„, .... -'•
„,- -
L ab.
4.,
, s '
Y e
,./ .., ,.,.4- ... ....
*
. .
.!, • • ,e- . .,. - ..:, -. or.
. . .. . ..,....
Ir. l • '
... .* 1 ^ . •
+ ... , . (f... . . . , ." ,.... : •
4 .
, ...
----.....‘ ' 4 " r . :,_ :: 4 441e/ I. , •, . ' * . 4 440 4?..i'''-i3'.:2 ` .417.- . - .' 1'. lit ' . r.7 - -1 3 ' ' f . 4 -
• s , 4 4: .,... : I 4
. c . r - ' ,, •., It. ■ "
0 - .,•,- , . - ** Jr. 1 ...._ • • '
, :it i .4ittve. 1... c...A:r:,.... 1..?..,)11.. ,
ir •i,,I A. .. ' ./
,-
I • 4. 1 9 i . ei . .' '.- ."4 a t
t • ....1,, „:,„,_.. , hit ..
., ...1
• ,
1 143' ' Pt
C‘f
' tr , . At
it).. I A ix IN ,, ii.,., . -,..... ..lx...„• . - ; 4 ' r •- ,A ; ay ... ... NV
/ " 1 O' '' '''": . • t .
... \ l ...., ....; •ti' . * . . I F.' ! Vt ,_ ,5' . . , ; . 1W* •:''' ' - • e ,e ,...
..
Se e e . I. ,.., • .. e• - - • ...r+ . 5 4, '• iit •,/e, .... t
... e . - Ir. ,. , 4 1• , .., • ..,. 0,,,, n ? ,
I . . • . 2 -,.,
i r .. • / . ('. Irak . l g k i , I : ' I VO :k- • • "fr k 4. e _ ;
V ". , .. re 4. to' Jr t - '1 , • ' * _ .,.. , .. Er
N '7- --re ir:' to' ,,,, „ * * • --;
'' -- f• x . .,_ ...,.
... _
I ' . r"
Ira ...LI - c --- •,--, "0- ,
.. .,.. .„,,,. 1 ,
s .e. , :. , . ,' - y .: . _
.'. . ' (0` 40 4 t ft . , • ...
• ' ' " l ' "V
,, • 4 ' * *
t , . . ... . e '"'.. .. . el' - '',+:: e f - ''' '''''.. •
- . t .. irn. I ... •,-. u -;" ._ " -- ' _r• ,. L,;;;I' ir rtr,
`,,''' sAirl, :-' '" IIIF s w 4re •< ' 4 ' T L'''''' :* 'fi ' "
; . ..,, .i-ei" t ' ----.' r _,,,.,' t - / ' , _ , . 1 j e L 1 15;rtr ' t ia' l' !r‘ -.; : • 1 0
1 .
, ., ■
. P 71i •., '• lf, letA ' ;uti -(4 L . ,.. . N otit - ).- '/I
_ ...
- `'.- 0 - 10. , r ,....._ .,: , Th....,/i 1 .-._ / 41.. *
,, .,,.. , . , ,%." #
Itr
$
A , - . . - ,, ,,,....., 3 . f i t g fift.- .. .1 j'• - ' ' . •
. , ,
-''' • •
.. I.
•
11
it 1 •
'''.. ' ,-I,I, , , ,,-. ,,1 r 1 ...... ,...., f . T..... id. * 1 I I I I . .. 16 • 4 ' -
; ...' r '''' ...-
a. ; . . .
• , , ,-. ,.. . 4 ' e
,„-.. .., ,, ,. „ . ,
.„.
1417
1 41 ic 4 i - 1 - 1 i 7 - , • .T Nt , , - 116 .0 - . - ' i . . ,, a • r 4 t * 1, , ,
it
i ab._ t . r.a. i
, ll r -... . • , , ■ .; • I L
r
Iftle.,," 0 •Lip. '04„ / • '
t ik I , , . , ,,,, • • . 1 ,, k ir.
, S Road..
i• , . ,
. 4.. 1 , • r ir p , e , 1), I'
I - ., • ) if 4 e _ __ ___ e J 0 '
. .....
KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH
WORK SESSION
Work Session of: '
Please PRINT your name Please PRINT your l e
(17V
,7 . /b rad/ C \ \ \U V
,a9 A/ /c 5
0i,e. 4776- - \ \t.
.i ��Q 3k Q\
A/ a
NvA
. -...- . .
—
. _
... 44 • . -
• - ..- - -'- — - :.. ' .•.— -,..... ,. `,:-
,.. -•
_ . --4- 4.-...-7.:,.. --2- 6 :0.. L. - _- • -- ..•
_
. ,
_
A . .
r:'•-,
_
.
_-_•
. -
. .
. . ,
_ .
_ . •
.le: - ' - -. . . ------
- 4 , -.; --- - ..s.,, • -7 '
.
.- .
, -
. _ ■ - _
7
tillitilL: -
— la
■•■■• r ....., II ._
.
., _ „„ 7 ..... _
- -
7 -
f. ra,
, _ -. b-
. ,
.... 1
.4-.
., ..., , • ••.r 1 . 1 . ___ - Jir• - IMV•li iir NON' --
- - - - , - • , ,,,'"l' ,. v ' • ' , ms -
•
I ... 70
i . .
A.- I - • "■. IC -
, .
V _
t, I ...-.
-4 • 1, V
• . ' - , ' r0 1
- ,__• — ,
, • _
, •
. ,.
'''..
.26- '-!:- ' ',?''''-' .. • - .
-?-.--- -4.e.
'''. ',' ., • '.4 :‘,, .''.• .,:-: o . . s . ' . . : - ''" ' , 1 .
• ■,.t ... ...- .
' . .? ;1. ...44V 4 %. ::.'.■ .5,..... ' :. • , ,...,4r... ,. . ... •
, ,,'.. '''' .,.., ,-, - , i , s; - , :'!" 4 - , ti . sli• ,,--..-" .
- -4 --
• -
- ' • i: - --1.;;"•;-i •,-'''' - - •
. . ,.
•- -.
..,,,,.. 0
... —
-.1
• .■ i .. .
• .., - - -. 1 .15 . ,, ---'...e•-.•-•... . _ - -
. . , .
• - l
s••• .... •
'' - -- ' • -3 • - _-A, -13-- **4. - , • ..,-
-Ir. 0 „, • -
4 ■ ..,t ,
• ! , '..-' / , . ?e,,titir , ,
, ,' .kft_, , cru..._ — .
.'.::.; ,
_.— ' - - -
.; ...• ' .1.,.'• 4 • r, t .%••
. . ' " 0 t .-.'
-
, 0. . .., .,,...,,„ ., .-- ..
, „ .
. ,
'f :
- I , — 0 , 4.i , \ , . . -•, -, .....
t ' —'.
. .
••• /
'"' " l • ''' ..,/, , "- --, ;,, . lkimih I I 1 7
-.. 1 .
k Si
k 'f 6‘ 1 S d = i '' 1° ....) VO 51 VC4-1 112°10 1\I1 - P 1 O11)1
•
) . . .
T
*; - . '''' /.
. 4 , ' . • ..
¢ k` / '
a 01 it •
r TI j '., 1 a •
1h . 7 1
� 1 k i t t k t
ro
• " J s i •
•
j ^ i
0
•
h l
t h -TX p' : ' f I
• + f p. ' * t' S 4. • YY ` t f '!
• * � , h t 1 1 • 1 r ' � t � � tis � I •� •
" {
J. 1 y 7' 4 ' aS. G r (,I' ' •
44
ili 1 i •��.{ I •' •(' +' 3 -.
4 zI I f . � 'a <
i' i If'
I n }i Y 1 i4.:., _ 414
i
I T I� y 't: 4. r
1t'. rl l 1
3 1 t . �1 " ' �� - :rat ...
• S . 1iv P' / i r l . .1.6'•a
" 9/— .1 t I .
_
r
r 9 r
g .a
r
• .
1 $ ,'°
i ' 1 ' ' ' : .t .4,, •
•
1.
jai