Loading...
2011-06-28 Joint Work Session CITY COUNCIL— BOROUGH ASSEMBLY JOINT WORK SESSION AGENDA Tuesday, June 28, 2011 Assembly Chambers 7:30 p.m. (City Chairing) Joint work sessions are informal meetings of the City Council and Borough Assembly where elected officials discuss issues that affect both City and Borough governments and residents. Although additional items not listed on the joint work session agenda are sometimes discussed when introduced by elected officials, staff, or members of the public, no formal action is taken at joint work sessions and items that require formal action are placed on a regular City Council and /or Borough Assembly meeting agenda. Public comments at work sessions are NOT considered part of the official record. Public comments intended for the "official record" should be made at a regular City Council or Borough Assembly meeting. Discussion Items 1. Public Comments (limited to 3 minutes each) 2. PTSA Resolution Regarding Drug Enforcement Officer 3. Kodiak Board of Realtors/Housing Shortage 4. Borough Sales Tax Proposal 5. AMHS Ferry Dock 6. Fisheries Analyst and RFP 7. Animal Control Contract and Services 8. Juneau Legislative Reception 9. Health Insurance Clerk's Note: Mary Forbes submitted this on behalf of the Kodiak High School Parent KHS PTSA Rescfution: Teacher Student Association. A RESOLUTION TO SUPPORT THE KODIAK ISLAND DRUG ENFORCEMENT TEAM TO COMBAT MAJOR DRUG TRAFFI CKI NG THAT !SHAVING A NEGATIVE I M PACT ON THE YOUTH OF OUR COM M UNIT! ES. WHEREAS, the number of refardsto the department of Juvenile alai cefor drug and a cohol related i rnci dences has more than doubled s nce 2002, (State of Alaska Division of Juvenile Justice Data) and WHEREAS, the Kodiak City Rol ice Deportment once had three more pol ice off i oars assigned to the drug enforcement team in 2002, and WHEREAS, the Kodiak City Police Depatment has l ess f i nand al apport to provide our communities with a more robust Drug Enforcement Agency, and WHEREAS, a Strong Local Drug Enforcement Agency will work in patnatip with feller /, state, and local law enforcement agencies, prosecutors, and probation officers f or the purpose of enhancing i nte- agency coordination and intelligence ad facilitating multi - jurisdiction/ investigations to combat major drug trafficking and manufacturing, and WHEREAS, a more robust local drug enforcement agency w i l l decxease the amount of alcohol and drugs current' y avai l abl a to the youth of our communities, and WHEREAS, this f undi ng will add two addition/ drug enforcement police offices in addition to providing essential training and equipment needed by the drug enforcement team, and WHEREAS, the" drug and Soohd" problem is a community problem, and WHEREAS, the City of Kodiak and the Kodi ak Borough is responsible for the f i nand al apport to help keep our communities Saf a and Drug Free, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Coundl of the City of Kodiak and the Council of the Kodiak Borough that it hereby accepts the f i natal obligation to support a more robust Drug and Enforcement team to keep our communities safe and drug free. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Kodiak and the Kodak Borough will execute the necesay fi nand a support to bui Id a more robust Drug Enforcement Agency. The f oregal ng resolution was introduced at a regul a meeting of the Council of the City of Kodak held on the day of , 2011, and the regular meeting of the Borough Assembly by , who encouraged the city aid borough to discuss the resolution and offer any other auggesti ons to build a more robust drug enforcement teen to protect the youth on Kodiak Island. 43 Ps APR 201 = 1 Rece►v City Clerk's off City of Rod�.aF. ice 1. � �� n 1, 3031 ` )\ 4 N u Kodiak Board Of Realtors tl 4 NAY 2011 co co l. 1420 Mill Bay Road, Suite A c y ees o d to Kodiak AK 99615 e City of Kodeak r� May 25, 2011 Carolyn Floyd, Mayor City of Kodiak 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, AK 99615 Dear Mayor Floyd, The Kodiak Board of Realtors is requesting time to discuss possible solutions to the Kodiak housing shortage, at the City of Kodiak and Kodiak Island Borough joint work session, anytime after June 30, 2011. We are requesting approximately 20 minutes plus whatever question time the Assembly may need. You may contact us at Alaska One Realty, LLC, Mr. Grant Shields, President, (907) 486 -4663 with that schedule. Sincerely, 6,A dza,./...,,,,,,,__ On behalf of Kodiak Board of Realtors Darlene Williamson, GRI Associate Broker cc: Bob Brodie, Associated Island Brokers, Inc. Nova Javier, Kodiak Island Borough Clerk KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH AGENDA STATEMENT JUNE 16, 2011 REGULAR MEETING ITEM NO: 13.C.2 TITLE: Ordinance No. FY2012 -02 An Ordinance of the Assembly of the Kodiak Island Borough Placing the Question of the Adoption of a Sales Tax on the October 4, 2011, Regular Election Ballot. SUMMARY: At the October 6, 2009 general election the registered voters of the Kodiak Island Borough approved a $76,310,000 general obligation bond for renovating and additions to the Kodiak High School. The Borough Assembly has also established a fund for renewal and replacement of existing capital assets. This fund is being funded with interfund loans from the Facilities Fund which will be paid back over a period of 20 years. To make the payments on these bonds and the renewal and replacement interfund loans the Borough needs to increase revenues about $4,000,000 per year. This equates to approximately 4 mills. If the Borough would adopt a 2% sales tax, with similar exemptions as the City of Kodiak, the Borough would avoid this 4 mill property tax increase. By adopting a sales tax the entire populace would help pay for these expenditures, not just the property owners. FISCAL NOTES: Account No.: Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Required: APPROVAL FOR AGENDA: RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to adopt Ordinance No. FY2012 -02 in first reading to advance to public hearing at the next regular Assembly meeting. Introduced by: Borough Assembly 1 Requested by: Borough Assembly 2 Drafted by: Finance Director 3 Introduced: 06/16/2012 Public Hearing: 4 Adopted: 5 6 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH 7 ORDINANCE NO. FY2012 -02 8 9 AN ORDINANCE OF THE ASSEMBLY OF THE KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH 10 SUBMITTING THE QUESTION OF THE ADOPTION OF A SALES TAX 11 TO THE QUALIFIED VOTERS OF THE BOROUGH AT THE 12 OCTOBER 4, 2011 REGULAR ELECTION 13 14 WHEREAS, in the October 6, 2009 general election, the voters of the Kodiak Island 15 Borough approved a $76,310,000 bond issue to finance the planning, design, and 16 construction of school and related capital improvement projects; and 17 18 WHEREAS, when these bonds are sold, the Kodiak Island Borough must increase its 19 revenues to make the principal and interest payments on these bonds; and 20 21 WHEREAS, the Assembly desires to implement tax measures which will generate the 22 additional revenue needed to finance education and debt retirement in a way that spreads 23 the tax burden across the entire populace instead of just on the property owners. 24 25 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE ASSEMBLY OF THE KODIAK ISLAND 26 BOROUGH THAT: 27 28 Section 1: This ordinance is of a general and permanent nature and shall become a part 29 of the Kodiak Island Borough Code of Ordinances; 30 31 Section 2: It is the intent of the Kodiak Island Borough Assembly that the Kodiak Island 32 Borough adopts sales tax powers as follows: 33 34 • The sales tax shall be an amount of up to two percent (2 %). 35 36 • This will be a Borough -wide tax and will be in addition to any sales taxes 37 imposed by cities within the Borough. 38 39 • This tax will only be used to finance education and debt retirement. 40 41 • The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly is empowered to enact such 42 ordinances as necessary to implement and administer the collection of 43 the tax. 44 45 • This tax amount may not be increased without further voter approval. 46 47 48 49 . Kodiak Island Borough Ordinance No. FY2012 -02 Page 1 of 2 50 51 Section 3: The Borough shall submit the following proposition to the qualified voters of 52 the Borough at the October 4, 2011 regular Borough election. The proposition 53 must receive an affirmative vote from a majority of the qualified voters voting 54 on the question to be approved. 55 56 Proposition No. 1 57 Sales Tax 58 59 Shall the Kodiak Island Borough adopt sales tax powers and levy a sales tax 60 of up to two percent (2 %) of sales, rents, and services provided in the 61 Borough? 62 c ) YES cm NO 63 64 65 ADOPTED BY THE ASSEMBLY OF THE KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH 66 THIS DAY OF 2011 67 68 69 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH 70 71 72 73 Jerome M. Selby, Borough Mayor 74 75 ATTEST: 76 77 78 79 Nova M. Javier, MMC, Borough Clerk Kodiak Island Borough Ordinance No. FY2012 -02 Page 2 of 2 4 y 3i vn� r S9 a e } a .1.1...? � .. 1 t e6 a'.0 � A • r v as r a p hi • 3 X 1''' T o n e y kir I e \. / \ fv if s i /rirr v r / `� ,• y i '3' a I I q 'lc . �za t, / . p y / E� r to 'a � v u ne � t.e / � '�4 A a :; ,;/, ;qd 6� Y i i.0 vnr r r e a 41 � . �V 1 4 4faC�.-'7> Jt. m 4 �, : c ea'`j e it r i,a n r r 1), `. \\ t 1�� r i��� 01 � f'1 iu Ii I .q'_a 9* y ry a l s d p L 7 a r .' gl a Ie 1 i /�r ; '2.' �., y rten� In qyi. 1 c a u ail a 1 an v � � f C° /� $t�'c x7h� i�� i a ini "* )1F4J t ,12 r �r t a , e e r n e ,.. ¢ 4M 1 P I, { y .Ac} /1 �1 / l�r lir rtrr• rl n",";;,,,,,,,, f 'S'141/..'' . E447 r• +' e • K a J ) n „ C ao n it e id SA Sy i a'. c' / 4 .» j V�.+p2 . -1T d • „v + ^. . qy . \ ;'/ }< • ri jilt t a [ n A n /� 1i/ /l n l lk/ ! -y / ,{ + y3¢ � � °�b S s €h '>M �� :i ar o t /� /ull r t a7 4v l { a r�/ {44•";?-11,,,t,./0 ,.$ / ° °...' ).-44y -.Lm• -: r i .k,— *� iy T�� ....�� v # , S '� , ., � ; Y $$ i t II T k- n , 'r. II i-+h\ II 1 i - 1 T ' M Y f9 1� gp� e2—A,..'".14.7•:_, • 4 ' 1 i\ \ I b' t t, T - r �' f' f of «k. r •, sp+ e^"i .k id- 1... - i • x "' r f `t ' O fiF,�. q S ' e '�s " A i »3 fi S y y �( R' / Y" • .. ,i n"/L.' 'N v ,3t,',/tr • i;; , w e z ✓ 3 v p ? V i!P+. Yk [>h� �N t l � a4' �- y ; h 2:4,-; ti f / "}� 1/. ' #r °1.+. @ " S'd t /' k v l f,� / / �F Ak' t } a �. � i / x ', . . fir qq J � � y t I 't3. . » , s y y l Zia y a , , s e.4;, t * V t*s ,�. 'T C �r F • 3 •i7.'a `k \ / i , 0 N' t a'. , - h r ) 4 µV1 " 4.1° ° "; 21.40a. S F' ' h 7: •., % e ms''} 4 tr ic L `w -I Y n " . aria l N ) l l l Wa kr 'Y 1 i .r C c ,. •„,0.0,'14,/r, h tiL l o- • �` 1 •sw .• T'yr a' /lack A//lo1 a 'la( a ll � 44 $ ••.^i piv «v 7 ,., s } pt;lc li .� .1 r��� 4 � } fi r &`� � � .5 d 4 4 � u rx' J . h yF PI i ! 5� r " - 4 . ,„,7;/' 1e 7,.',p,' d 4<< #cvP . r n .- eetrv+.-r a a z'SY§. �a,ie..2is�..�+.' .,. ./!', `.. � .4sn...�re _ ''^ - i ".Rs. . t l�:=_.4 _'��f�k ..z*_:a:e.�m�k^ rr -x FIGURE 7B PIER PIER 1- ALTERNATIVE ZB / ADDITIONAL DOCK u Kodiak Ferry Terminal s trines rno. osto wm..rorax.iw r roouc a l.,. hvoelWl•• •ean.•.a�e -.aVUU ,x rov'wr s- .aV�r., vu .. "...v w ov+. u,.0 FISHERIES CONSULTANT RFP I . PURPOSE AND INTENT A. It is the primary intent of this Request for Proposal to select a qualified firm or individual to act as a Fisheries Consultant. The Fisheries Consultant will work jointly for the local governments of Kodiak Island: the Kodiak Island Borough (KIB) and the City of Kodiak (City). The selected proposer will enter into a term contract for a period of two years with options for two additional one year extensions. The term contract will include a six month initial review to ensure an understanding of the Scope. The contract will also include a termination clause by either party with a 30 day notice. B. The work shall be performed in compliance with all applicable federal, state and local requirements. The KIB and City require all work to be performed efficiently, cost effectively, and according to best business practices of the industry. 2. BACKGROUND /SITUATION The economy of the Kodiak region is based on a healthy, diverse and well - managed fisheries resource that includes more than 30 species of fish harvested and processed onshore. The Kodiak region comprises all fisheries user groups -- subsistence, sportfish, commercial sportfish, personal use, commercial fish, the processing sector, fisheries research and protection sectors, and the fishing industry support sector. Policy development and regulatory management in the Kodiak region is challenging because of the need to address such diverse and competing concerns as species fished, vessel size, gear type, limited entry permits, quota share, limited license permits, and crew share interests. 3. SCOPE (aim or purpose) The primary role of the Fisheries Consultant will be to monitor, analyze and report on fisheries issues and policy developments that may impact or affect the economy and community of Kodiak. A. Monitor actions and pending decisions of regulatory bodies such as the NOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service, the State of Alaska Department of Fish and Game, and International Pacific Halibut Commission to anticipate regulatory actions that could impact Kodiak's economy. B. Attend meetings of the North Pacific Fisheries Management Council, State of Alaska Board of Fisheries, and other fishery meetings as directed, to provide a summary of issues, discussion and actions to the Assembly /City Council that could impact Kodiak's economy. C. Provide written quarterly report to both the Borough Assembly and the City Council and make presentations at joint Borough Assembly /City Council work sessions. Reporting should include discussions or updates of ongoing concerns, introductions of proposed changes, and a summary of work performed since the previous report. D. Prepare analyses of potential impacts of proposed regulatory changes on the Kodiak economy. E. Provide information to Assembly /Council to analyze and understand issues based on facts and from a neutral point of view, and to make decisions or develop positions on issues affecting or impacting the economy and people of Kodiak. F. The successful proposer should possess the following qualifications: * An understanding of local and regional fisheries to include species, vessel and gear types, fisheries user groups -- subsistence, sportfish, commercial sportfish, personal use and commercial fish, and the processing sector. * A thorough understanding of the State constitution regarding Alaska's fisheries and all state and federal fisheries laws and regulations. * An understanding of fisheries resource management issues and how they affect Kodiak's economy. * Ability to communicate effectively, both orally and written, to and on behalf of the governing boards. * The ability to remain neutral on divisive issues. * Extensive experience in state and federal fisheries resource management processes. * Ability to provide applicable insurance coverage, such as workers' compensation, commercial automobile liability and professional liability. * Possession of a State of Alaska Business License. G. The successful proposer will enter into a professional services contract that must be approved by the Kodiak Island Borough Assembly and Kodiak City Council. 3. REQUIRED INFORMATION A. Proposals must include: • Transmittal Letter • Implementation Plan • Company Profile • Experience • Credentials • Proposed Fee • References • Ability to provide applicable insurance coverage 4. PROPOSAL PROCESS A. Proposals will be accepted until 3 PM on (date -tbd). It is the proposer's responsibility to deliver proposals to: Kodiak Island Borough Office of the Manager 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, AK 99615 (907) 486-9301 Faxed and electronic proposals will not be accepted. B. Proposals must be clearly marked: FISHERIES CONSULTANT SERVICES PROPOSAL Provide six unbound copies of the proposal. C. Evaluation Methodology: Each proposal will be evaluated according to criteria and given the relative weight shown in the table below. 2 ,, EVALUPTI'ONiCRITERIA;" t , RELATIUEWEIGFIT PROPOSED RATES 25% QUALIFICATIONS /EXPERIENCE 25% IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 25% REFERENCES 15% OVERALL QUALITY OF PROPOSAL 10% The Kodiak Island Borough and City of Kodiak reserve the right to reject or accept any or all bids, to waive irregularities or informalities in the proposal, and to give particular attention to the qualifications of the Proposer. KIB and City reserve the right to issue written addenda to revise or clarify the RFP, respond to questions, and /or extend or shorten the due date of proposals. KIB and City retain the right to cancel the RFP process if it is in their best interest. Any cost incurred by proposers for the preparation and submittal of the proposal is the sole responsibility of the proposer. A proposal may be corrected or withdrawn by a written request received prior to the deadline for receipt of proposals. All proposals become part of the public record and no part of any proposal may be confidential. All proposals and other material submitted become KIB and City property and may be returned only at their option. KIB and City assume no responsibility or liability for the transmission, delay, or delivery of proposals by either public or private carriers. Any and all media announcements pertaining to this RFP require KIB and City's prior written approval. This RFP does not obligate KIB and City or the selected proposer until a contract is signed and approved by all parties. Please contact Borough Manager Rick Gifford at (907) 486 -9302 with questions regarding this solicitation. Animal Control stats 2008 - present City and borough combined animal intakes at shelter, provided by FiSK: 1474 City: 539 (37 %) / Borough 935 (63 %) City and Borough combined animal complaints, taken from KPD Complaint Logs: 2269 Loose animal complaints: 1723 *City 61% / Borough 39% (estimate) Annoying animal complaints: 248 *City 20% / Borough 80% (estimate) Aggressive animal complaints: 298 *City 31% / Borough 69% (estimate) Animal Cruelty investigations, taken from KPD Complaint Logs: 50 City 11 (22 %) Borough 39 (78 %) Aggressive Animal Reports investigated, taken from KPD Complaint Logs: 194 City 73 (38 %) Borough 121 (62 %) *Percentage estimate based upon statistical analysis of 2011 calendar year to date. Page 1 of ESRI ESRI Support Center Help Kodiak Island Borough r < <� �I" � (7 �� 1) ue;• I T0i .�^�, -�' . - sot • ,n i.'r;,( Yd�'d ka ,e t i}ft 4r r rk4 t 4b Results a� � , ++ ft + s � . , y a d � n � v a � �7 /5 1 r i \ ' r r �4 f + +r? ..y l s'7+%'�2.C+' rs d 4 1 r ZN,I' -Y--S � ty P 7 f IS` 'N 1 + tl f i s ' 3 '{ � ! Y 4 F nr�: �sn)' 9 ' r "Y Vi f 6341 j � + � i 1'� � � • i rk 4 Map Contents G 5 r.d v ' + "I'I „y, f P.# IJA� f a 3 1191 x r , t �/ „ : ' S tG C , „� ,. g, Y �ST r � � N tsi�S . k ✓'Y '.� 1 Y M 'I� II y C i-'a [J on 't. s .A:Y F r , ( t; ” ,,,,\ ✓ # 1 r"'7U s.,'(: t 1 ` "r^ .2 ,..'o ." s �� 4 ` i r sI,'r z r :� • r +.a ? n •... r .' J t ` y b ra. Il �� ' 1 ;1 - �i � • .1 i!,X �1� i 1 s 1.4 f V , Water Features 1 w Y 'I 4.,. " � �" N J t3l of r 1 :'• rk #40 �t' ]Labels , I �.P �` I l r j n l itY g .0, 01' Dt3 �� rY r �• s ., t� 4 v ' " , ' t - - AF , ,,vr t i ' a$ G . sY , tf ati � „ 4 ..tv' �p i� r t i . 4" j. v „ - . "� 4, r -8 h { []Streets t } ° a r� a r : '' yy � �x 33 ° f , 4 i / 1 . i7 x i' c 1 F F M. 4 ° , 1 ' h , r�yl ' v A r i ; E '� �� R. Parcels 1� Z Jtk t r p J'�e o- . . 1 • ^ Virt -4 `'t4 ' top 11. V SA h't " 4 ' t • • 3 tla ( r I f' W Pj s f F �• d r, RPLSS t �� + t r A "' rXI�.' 1A.e 3 � \ r a .t Y � d i. ], r ,� � it v, I � { t w . x �tt , marl ' 'a 6 s ` ,e �, .w.:1w,S` � A %, H Background Imagery, r i c a " "' ,tw YC� `e �3 •�s,.. $ 4 M k * , 4;. . , ... � e c. bin Imagery ` '( " � fit r� , T ° I n , rl k , ` +5 " r . ' , , ?w c s ' 1.7 e , � � f 4 . ±;` , lft Imagery ya , y , '[ ti'r t ,�,�I�. i + $ Y k y s+ � ] 1 . . ' l " i ' Is mob y _ vi... '4 4m Imageryryi } l4r "Y �'�Y Y rf.r k 1v r. R w , I ` " .F A' s c^ . � . r 'p� ' h ' 5m Imagery It f r A ° ; +,�, 'ir''f�t " C ` . e A � i,y of °'' x. x E^' i 'P + �t1�W �r,� >• S 2ft Imagery t �`• �'+ x',yic s i y �, A ,. t: � ft b + "' r *? ,f i t 0¢, g v c1� F c l a . ' 0 , . { + ' A � � t s� lm Imagery r , N 4R s �"• eCx,. r • a h �, / 11 � ` Shapes k' '�'' . r" r' ,4"'X 0334 '� t , �V 4 � � ,�Jpl ,Aill, A' ' r r!4 ` ' '� ' F , yy to j i R r Al . t I '' J v 4,55. ' -. j R r„s i r~• r ac . ,� b i do :�X v ` 1 a a.� ..-- , e r y l l lit Y 'cr ��' t , * E � :�' ., 1 Y`} �' l 4 A1 f'�•$ Fr y ✓ ' ! , 4. - V As' 4A + A3h,�` �!, a r x *e"— i4. d. J` � 4` , g • ( �F -a � `6gt 4, " Rt tt Y o " 40 0, ,eV ° v '� � 4' ;. '. , „ ro � .p � .4 t . Qd� ` s % ,I , $M �4� ,y V itt' .x J. `C" s }c ; : 0 x 4 ' .,'i . �thilli lr' �l 1 f C Ste'\ *±<'t.)\ t +I4 I. r 34B„ 6 . y � B • � �SC( a rt'' � � �n` � � r 2 a � q " * � j� � y / ® % I� \� 4— r , . . 0 6 A tt * o * fr ty , . il ; ,� sf' . , N: r ts, As — A. 9 t� 6/28/201 1 hllp: / /gis.kodiakak.us /K111/ 1 1 / J / Page 1 of 2 Kodiak Island Borough :fr.& e sat s u ppo t cu H eiP 0 ., r, � . <- 1 r`: G 1J !Results ._.._.._ ....__.de...__W. � ,�.at ,. �.,,�,/ � , . ` , _ Py . e ' k ?• � w '° a l a - -4 r ~< a „, %44'4 ,' P . �� 9. a n • Ad {, �` 1 z .* �!4 b » Y fF . ' t i ..a y..E+.Y u ") '- - d[ f' '' . Map Contents . u e+. a < �^. eM1 '' . & �Y . . +p. +i` F en* ' "„ fig ,,�t { c a� ' r� e if / ,ti ? � r �.,�'p �� . i P ' a � r ` f' r . i,e . { r ap " c t s �" 3 . , +r"' fia" ,P " 'e t C a ri a / (t , :• �Ct�a` , A i 'q G:nh , � KIB l a � ,'..\ u e , s .ffie ' (`.c.4 , r * a ' f l : Ls s , I» , xar4�' l '� * + . 3.�� a i t 1 a+F 7� t dt� 3 ,f � t t ! ^. nea 4. YF kT J l w. _ q__F +k 'Vent. ' * .144,V*l i t 4& ^ai 5i , a , � Xx r � . P 59i rt •' a ' a — Water Features � +, ._ �. i� „ v ' c in a e x " ',.,:: + . 5c''at +r - . °,? /+ hn . ^'�g b i( s ' it i4 ' 1 ` ' i PI Y � '$ i - s ,.a ,,$ afi +`,&'. i ,a }, ' • Labels I r . ..^� W S- "1¢• , . xx t f j F. -* r ' ` a ,� a t' € . s $ k, � w f " i +' ' p . �! • r 4 , ! a 31- 1 1 , z* „,,,...,..e t J. Streets b s. ` p �54+ n ,.t s ' qE 1'` �' „co s'e-k ' Y A„ f” 1 a 'r ``�'Y.'+ � 's� • 1.4 `{. f" r ° *" t 1 , x, 't , „0 , * t r?k d i i s NA . t 1 g i-a ,, ., i 4t i y � rr*�tr j t:1' , s xr r, . - i 4 `a y a4 + r � L , + ' d f) � 46� ,. "�#' � a Y; Parcels U C' t y s F i a . p J " , -. 9 1.4, u ps l ,.uke* P. Air � y" ' Y t ti1 i'L xe 'irk' 1 1. 49 i � * ^ w ? t * h '7 4 , ? , ,4 ki l t e *� i.i"" - ` ,8 'r rr a . 4=4=1 - y a z it j t r ' , J > 4 y:' PLSS yr V y � .� 'Y a ;.� v t � t� 1,4„.. r +ip- .'.f� kw i r � r F .. ]' a ,r' � i x - ,, , a 1 p ' s .....„,p, G # r .t, " � 1 .4 ' l � .. .. rr 4.4 . ,, r h , Background Imager)/ Y gs �`F lt §; „, s L xe i '' x „ r.,y, n !( a'�y {:,, M 4 /� q s' . ... ` ., ab".. ,S a ,., ,,r "t -t S� 4+ t i e ,f � Y S ° " xa ,, c#1).4: �' +„ - s ' „A tt e � , ,; x 61n Imagery i .4. ' a dr `a" a , �r +' S =014.4. t, �g, lft imagery k. ,> � �� # r " ,� .a ` "i ��r -E�` � . X''' r . � ^. - ` � �5" 4m Imagery r � , n 4 , *3 # x „ N " i , r g t y } if ' " .." • s* la , " .• ` �v ° , t • Y s .. y , 'ka-fr / 3"o r 4 w a' , + Sm Imagery .1 b . t. , a m":e " tffi,. t ti { e . 1 �' rE � $/ {� 4 �6� r� � F ti x 1 2ft Imagery Z.21:: "' tips +' ,� **M' ry s i s 1r � V . rj .,, rt� Cyi ��r 4,- • im Imagery 1 x r N s "s e 4 d ' .2 tr ! +- } a'h 'xc". r t� 44\ 4. r !" 47 ' � � y • Shapes 2 A ., * 'g „la— • 1 .t {� `� v."- • ' % ✓ r ` .as 4 ■ I ,, ' b ` - 'r x p� s L ''� Aa ` - ,.% . (,,k -'s' ' , h srs 4; � - w - � .,,, {, � v.'q '.x£ 1 ti e '+.,a s. F 'd i s� �fi i•?;r`� r ^f. ; ^ �' 1 ' .` a `? t '%' � t � \ ¢ ' �''+ � *� r� r $x 55 ��s j } ^b'k c fi 3}� Y "mss¢ .: tt'� Q �� ; 6 x g ' ! y* 4 - q a . -3 , ' 1 4. 1.. # t � �a „el. ,` Y ‘ �'`« „y44.04{:,-.. t a . v r + _ . e1 0 ( ,t, S s 7 ' a. I ' , p .1 % 348 " �'"� W 'r4� . . 4 f z_er�i ' "' h � r . -- v . r „,,, -- fe% '``* -' t r R "' , „ y, '?°, .,, P ' k , , , a't e 1 1 y y . ra„ x`.�^ys''4 `'"�? ` e`�,'! y ,p 5:ya' sr 6: ' r E �, � d � r _� E.i. ` . ra .:i_ , V + y L;*.V tab nta a�is"*w ' a • tb ,e....4. �" Y.n �Y 4 � �� ,� " ' r..c. '' I ii I, Pei UhklS S 1 --t.; tulles 4 rip S�) a{vo tt10 10 �x �0..a� 1od.1ctax 3oe,{G $ 3e1Mx'I2.�h,u .. 3 -3S htt // is.kodiakak.us /KIB/ 250 �' S M K 12.4 �r _ 31 Z . 5 K 6/28/201 ! P S ,...".+ - - A : ,i, 1 ____----1 ..." ? or A cw . ,.,...,/:),. e 'r Vi ( -'..N.N I_____-.--- -- ---„ , .\\:\s‘ ‘•.. 6 At...) I: A V. e _et i 4 . 0 ta ( b -,. li .... " \ ,) , , ea, :,.., pat I:. ■ , 7 -----) " --s(vc ' a"" 1 44 , \ >I, ‘ ----- 0 ) we , I allklei,C1 ..,, a, .i. C4 ID: MLLES IJIMIMaa• tjin 11 .4.4 Leas3 mem MLA • • 1 1 I k; tr, ■■trini rt N'------- 'C,i___aV i / --"--7. \ . t ■ • ; _, -'-''': St n V e l:. "%Pr xe l,„ C, 4 4 t, t., 'Cr-. Wi.. - Call•A cr/L-Or 001: a) rt,, L_______Lt, _,-3 ___=_-" ', tr ‘ 4 /_>,..,,, ( Tarr • /3/7/ .G.2"Th ifi ----.------‘ ----------- __„, 3 t 2 C # " - .. ---- -----L— c "" AY •°.la - - 1 c___ ---,,-_____ „,„i ,, Its; • -- -- -- c e r e " t ' 1,---_ ."---r---1 G - • , ---- '----...Z.- r•cal . ' L___ ,.,+-, , ... ._ i \ f./ at .:" . •:=••• 6 et: ---- - I - r ---------- ------___ Th y i . \ 16 re: NW% =HO rOl 1 • ^, -----.- --..._ - /' .-. - • - •stnia. L "-••■:,---.. \ r rL• / is <> k___ rieuvers WASCR. / % k Cj from apa Rao 0 I D._--- Kodiak area map brought to!you by: , A ••fr a t ).. ■ CLN, ....„" . z. 22. >„ .....__________ St2 .4"WR '-'Th -, i iiiiitHo n t uirC a at . - CISLAT 7 ti RI ' gtim ?in- ,- 0 olri Cm no .4,t,tt tro . < -, - c t? .!, - . w 03E, , , iv• a ! 4 ,, ff . a.niS • t r; .4-■ F.: - ..........4-} 107) 4864000 FAM:1207) 436-L016 Kodiak nd Borough School Distinct „ 3.....c y_ ,,, .... „., ,,,,,, ‘,...,,, , \\ _,IIMININIMIII, 1915 E, Rennet Drive Kodiak. Alaska 99615 t: (907) 486 3281 f: (907) 486 2336 www.providence.oryalaska April 13, 2011 PROVIDENCE Kodiak Island Medical Center Mayor Jerome Selby Kodiak Island Borough Assembly 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, AK 99615 Dear Mayor Selby and Borough Assembly Members. The undersigned members of the Medical Staff at Providence Kodiak Island Medical Center would like to express our concern regarding the reality of drug abuse in Kodiak. This is an issue that we, as physicians, deal with on a daily basis. An example of the prevalence of this issue is the 2009 Youth Risk Behavior Survey that provides statistics regarding drug abuse among high school students. The online version of this report is: htto:/ /www,kodiakschools.ora /p00e.oho ?Did =785. This report shows a shockingly high statistic of 17% of high school students abusing prescription medications. We encourage the Borough, along with the City of Kodiak, to support a more - . - robust Drug Enforcement team that will work in conjunction with other entities in the state, city, and borough to help keep our borough community safe and drug free. If you would like information regarding what we experience in the hospital and clinics, we would be happy to send a representative to speak at your next Borough Assembly meeting. Shawn Vainio, MD, is our point of contact. He can be reached at: 942 -9039 or shawnvainio@yohoo.com Sincerely, The Providence Kodiak Island Medical Staff • 0 • 1 "/ 9 AA M A l Ate to. h • ✓' it �L..r(�... j,;� TAlifE o L \E A P K �w A ; s > DEPARTMENT OF �P s,oN & Pu slrc F �: TRANSPORT AND 4 PUBLIC FACILITIES x t. SOUTIIEAST 9 • REGION- S,, sr -- P A L AS 4 2'4' OF N U.' RECONNAISSANCE ENGINEERING STUDY UPDATE KODIAK FERRY TERMINAL . n r • ' t 'ii d y' '` J � �}' A �' 1 ; i f r j y y� > , 9VV:11 � !: L € d • fi t) V �" l t, -t Mf..y* MP y t�`, k µ... ,�C i t bY` < ' '1,i i [4.411 t -`-, - ' � , 1 ,s ' - Rc rF �. •••,a, 'fr i lW 9 , t k}ir ;e ' ° c r - 2 T f 7 a r Yak . R �xi° 'r , • " po 42RE � � ( £ ty'. „� ' � e :t t e 'x7 ,.7, ' , ,,, �.a > ZL• c tY a[ t 5 j E r' r r• ,G , .,. , • 4 , - i v� v p R i ' r hit No i ' M U • -"« 1• `• s h y r a r?+ :55 ! w cr- ` M 1 . ,,„..--,, t k .4 1c . i 'r J N, w ^ �j y '4 , .. ,x '"r `-+, -. ■ a . "' i rr i `, `t e d A :41:4,r,''..., z1 ^ f ., . : m..4 m � e , .. ' " °' r t' i€ + P "" het }� °� Y : ; S t- - +.6f+i b � - r ye •` 8: t , ,cA,I?e® �T - � � gs /S' t J94.. < -r w rT .11.1 I a , f - ti rFxra- :ix x, � r � . y r„ i � • 1 i q * , .+� . s ' 'Y ` 2 , ' a � p a , i t `��.� - ,pt r+^ '. -t ,a , i a �•i �� 4' F `% .a ,. , y el ee tr X r r k" .-r 5 t , ..w °�� . tEt f .zR 1r P o- b w M 4 µt '^�• !a•'' /'!" . �... < ry �r + w+ �' , , X '4 It t . y tN w J � ry �k � P 'A i `l --i `'' 8 i � r : t � ^ P h 3 `4 . 4 ,� "� A • . - f h4' .# S r rtir �K vl ,,,y r q . - s , � ,� h z L_ f 4 r : ,. , r Fie • i�wi r k 4 Yn 4 .} ':'. fi:V:4Kr i + y. f a . .•"vYY4 14...4 ., _ [ ' f Or s a. f' ^�. PROJECT NO. 68938 HPRL- 0003(109) March 11 2011 1 STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC FACILITIES SOUTHEAST REGION RECONNAISSANCE ENGINEERING STUDY UPDATE PROJECT No. 68938 / HPRL- 0003 -(109) KODIAK FERRY TERMINAL PREPARED BY: KIRK MILLER, PE MARINE ENGINEERING MANAGER MARCH 11, 2011 ABSTRACT & NOTICE TO USERS The Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities (Department) is studying alternatives for a new Alaska Marine Highway System (AMHS) facility in Kodiak, Alaska. This Reconnaissance Engineering Study Update contains a summary of the Department's previous engineering studies and recent efforts to improve existing or construct new facilities for AMHS operations in Kodiak. Changes occur frequently during the project development process. Persons relying on information contained in this study should contact the Department for the most current information. Additional information can be obtained from the Marine Engineering Manager, Kirk Miller, PE at 907 - 465 -1215 or by email at kirk.miller @alaska.gov. -i - Table of Contents 1. Project Description 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Existing Ferry Operations in Kodiak 2 1.3 Problem Statements 3 1.4 Purpose and Need 4 1.5 Project Objectives 4 1.6 Project Development History 4 2. Evaluation Criteria 6 2.1 Dual Vessel Facility 6 2.2 Single Vessel Facility 7 3. Alternatives Considered 7 3.1 Near Island 8 3.2 Pier 2 9 3.3 St. Paul Harbor Breakwater (Recommended Alternative) 9 3.4 LASH Dock 9 3.5 City Transient Float 10 3.6 Pier 1 10 3.7 Summary of Alternative Costs 10 4. Summary and Preliminary Recommendations 11 5. References 13 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A — Correspondence Appendix B — Federal Funding Documents Appendix C — Project Cost Estimates Appendix D — Alternative Drawings -ii- Kodiak Ferry Terminal Reconnaissance Engineering Study Update State Project No. 68938 1., PROJECT 1)ESCRIP GION ' - • r 1.1 Introduction The Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities (Department) has been contemplating ferry terminal improvements in Kodiak for some time. This report summarizes the Department's previous studies and presents new information pertaining to ferry terminal improvements intended to improve the level of ferry service in Kodiak. Figures 1.1 and 1.2 show the project location. ALASKA Trr FAIRBANKS q I A ANCHORAGEI BERING SEA v 1 JUNEAU 9(.) ° ....d� -� PACIFIC OCEAN KODIAK Figure 1.1 Project Location Map -1- Kodiak Ferry Terminal Reconnaissance Engineering Study Update State Project No. 68938 154 152 150 148 148 .mute N. can. hi 7t i f i .. sm,ae o.p. 50 - .." �,."�e . ~Machin �- . Q G ULF Q _eo tAA a �.. 0 ,- PROJECT LOCATION 58 0 58 ; Kodiak 0d 1 5 «� / � p SOUTHCENTRAL ALASKA /! L. 1 152 150. 148 146 Figure 1.2 Project Location Map 1.2 Existing Ferry Operations in Kodiak The City of Kodiak has been served for over 40 years by the Alaska Marine Highway System (AMHS) using the M/V Tustumena, the principal mainline ferry operating in Southcentral Alaska and the eastern Aleutians. The Tustumena operates between Kodiak, Seldovia, Port Lions, and Homer with summer excursions to the Eastern Aleutian communities. The Tustumena moors at Pier 1 (also called the City Dock) located near downtown Kodiak. In 1998, the M/V Kennicott was added to the southwest route. Like the Tustumena, this ferry is ocean certified, equipped with a vehicle elevator, and is the only other AMHS ferry capable of serving the western communities. The Kennicott is 86 feet longer and 26 feet beamier than the Tustumena and is unable to transit the Near Island Channel and dock at Pier 1 because of its size. When the Kennicott calls at Kodiak it moors at Pier 2, a city -owned dock located on the northwest side of St. Paul Harbor. Figure 3.1 (reference Page 7) shows the location of Piers 1 and 2 within the community of Kodiak. -2- Kodiak Ferry Terminal Reconnaissance Engineering Study Update State Project No. 68938 Table 1.1 shows the scheduled number of visits to Kodiak by both vessels for the period from May 2010 to April 2011. Both vessels utilize elevator systems to load and unload vehicles to the fixed platform docks at Piers 1 and 2. VESSEL MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR Tustumena 7 14 14 13 15 8 0 11 15 14 15 15 Kennicott 12 9 8 8 4 6 2 0 0 0 0 3 Table 1.1— Scheduled Number of Ferry Visits to Kodiak (May 2010 to April 2011) The two existing vessel berths are about a mile apart and each have significant operational constraints that result in inefficiencies in providing ferry service in Kodiak. The two separated locations present logistical and operational obstacles for AMHS operations as further noted below. 1.3 Problem Statements The two ferries that serve Kodiak presently berth at two separate facilities - the Tustumena berths at Pier 1 and the Kennicott berths at Pier 2. There are deficiencies in the mooring and upland configurations at both sites and neither location is ideal for AMHS operations. Pier 1 is a 200 foot timber dock on the north shore of Kodiak North Entrance Channel located between a marine fuel depot to the east and a seafood processor to the west. The bow and stern of the Tustumena extend beyond the dock face and encroach on the adjacent facilities. A small ticketing office and parking area lie between the dock and the access road. The office has no passenger waiting area and parking is inadequate for those making reservations, ticketing or checking -in. There is no secured staging area; vehicles and commercial trucks queue up along the public road prior to loading the ferry. There is no separation of pedestrians and actively loading vehicles, posing a risk to travelers. The Kennicott cannot safely access or berth at Pier 1. Pier 2 is a 900 foot concrete platform dock on the north shore of St. Paul Harbor. This city - owned dock is a multipurpose facility frequently occupied by commercial fishing boats, research vessels, and ocean -going cruise ships in the summer season. The dock is often used for transfer and overhauling of fishing gear. AMHS must reserve use of the pier far in advance and unplanned delays in the Kennicott's schedule can cause conflicts with other vessels. AMHS does not have priority use of the facility. The Kennicott transfers vehicles with its shipboard elevator, not via a bridge as it does in Southeast Alaska, and may require an hour or more to unload the car deck. The dock is exposed to southeasterly swells from Chiniak Bay in the winter and there have been instances when the ship's roll has caused its transfer bridge to separate from the elevator. Crews must use extreme caution when transferring vehicles in these conditions. The dock is an open platform with no secured area for staging and screening of vehicles. All passenger reservations and ticketing is managed at Pier 1. Embarking passengers and vehicles must check in at Pier 1 and then proceed to Pier 2 to board the Kennicott. -3- Kodiak Ferry Terminal Reconnaissance Engineering Study Update State Project No. 68938 1.4 Purpose and Need The purpose of this project is to provide ferry terminal improvements in Kodiak that will increase the efficiency and safety for the transfer of passengers and vehicles by AMHS vessels. The need for the project is due to deficiencies of mooring facilities and upland land areas and related support facilities that presently hinder ferry operations at the present berthing locations. 1.5 Project Objectives Ideally, all AMHS operations would be incorporated into a single terminal that can serve both ferries. The combined terminal would provide adequately sized ticketing and passenger facilities, sufficient parking area, and staging that permits check -in, screening, and holding of embarking vehicles. The terminal would be used exclusively by AMHS to avoid schedule disruptions by other uses (non -AMHS) and aid in complying with U.S. Department of Homeland Security regulations. In the event that a dedicated AMHS facility that can adequately serve both vessels cannot be provided due to funding or other constraints, then project alternatives to improve vessel mooring and cargo transfer at the present berthing locations should be examined. 1.5 Project Development History The search for a new ferry terminal dates to 1980 when the Alaska State Legislature authorized the development of a new facility in Kodiak and in 1981 Federal funds were approved for preliminary engineering. The Kodiak Marine Highway Terminal Study, prepared for the Department in 1982, examined nine potential sites for location of a marine highway terminal. The study eliminated those sites not worthy of further investigation and reduced the list to three candidates: Alternate A - Near Island, Alternate B - Pier 2 and 3, and Alternate C - No Build. The No Build alternative meant continued use of Pier 1. The Kodiak Ferry Terminal Environmental Assessment considered the three alternatives in more detail in 1986 and selected Alternative A, a site on Near Island near the entrance to St. Herman Harbor, as the Department's preferred alternative. At that time, neither the City nor the public were supportive of Alternative A. The existing facility at Pier 1 was perceived to be superior to development of the Near Island Site. The Department determined that the Pier 2 and 3 sites were unacceptable because geophysical hazards threatened any development at the base of Pillar Mountain. With the elimination of Alternatives A and B, Alternative C - No Build alternative was approved and the Tustumena continued to moor at Pier 1. The search for a new terminal location ceased. In 2006, the City of Kodiak successfully lobbied for Federal aid to construct an AMHS ferry terminal and received $7.5 million in the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA -LU) funding bill. The earmark description reads, "Kodiak, AK Construction of AMHW [sic] ferry terminal and approach ". As a result, the Department renewed its search for suitable locations for a new ferry landing in Kodiak. Project funding is managed by the Department and listed as Need ID 2045 in the Alaska Statewide -4- Kodiak Ferry Terminal Reconnaissance Engineering Study Update State Project No. 68938 Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). Appendix B contains a copy of the various STIP approvals and federal funding documents that have been adopted or approved to date. The Department examined four sites in the Kodiak environs: Near Island, Pier 2, St. Paul Harbor Breakwater, and LASH Dock in Womens Bay. The suitability of each site was evaluated for construction of a terminal for exclusive use by AMHS to serve both the Tustumena and the Kennicott. Only those locations accessible by both ferries were considered in the study; therefore, sites in the channel were excluded. The Reconnaissance Engineering Study — Kodiak Ferry Terminal was completed in February 2007 and concluded that the Near Island site was the best option to meet the project objectives. The preferred alternative was construction of a terminal on the northern shore of Near Island, the same location identified as Alternative A in 1986. Before proceeding with development of the preferred alternative, the Department sought to verify that the vessel approach and departure at the Near Island site was feasible in most weather conditions. On April 23, 2008 buoys marking the location of the proposed mooring structures were set in the entrance to the channel and the Kennicott made a trial approach through St. Paul Harbor, stopped at the proposed terminal site, backed away from the site, turned 180 degrees, and then departed via St. Paul Harbor. The vessel master's assessment of the terminal site was unfavorable, see letter in Appendix A from Capt. Wilkens to the AMHS Port Captain. He considered the location safe in only the mildest weather and discouraged further consideration of the Near Island site. With elimination of the preferred alternative, the next best option considered in the reconnaissance study was development on the St. Paul Harbor breakwater. AMHS's preferred configuration was a terminal at the south end of the breakwater with the vessel bow pointing to the southwest. At this location vessels have more space to maneuver during their approach and more room to leeward if needed during adverse weather. Construction of a terminal at this site is expensive however and requires a pile supported dock and an approach and staging area embankment. Initial cost estimates far exceeded the available funding. The general consensus was this project was unaffordable and project development stalled. On April 29, 2009 the City urged the Department to use the available funds to reconstruct the existing terminal at Pier 1 or construct a new facility at the City Transient Float, see correspondence in Appendix A from City Manager Freed to Commissioner von Scheben. Both sites are within the channel and inaccessible to the Kennicott. However, the City agreed to continue to accommodate the larger ferry at Pier 2. Work on this project was temporarily suspended pending direction from AMHS on how to proceed. On September 21, 2009 the Department surveyed the uplands and water depths of the City Transient Float that is located just west of the Near Island Bridge. Several alternatives were developed for constructing a terminal building, vehicle staging, parking, and berthing for only the Tustumena at both Pier 1 and the City Transient Float. There are very limited uplands available for vehicle staging and parking between the channel shore and developed properties at both locations. -5- Kodiak Ferry Terminal Reconnaissance Engineering Study Update State Project No. 68938 All candidate sites at Near Island, Pier 2, LASH Dock, and St. Paul Harbor were reanalyzed under this study effort. This updated study examined all feasible terminal locations in the Kodiak region, including those not previously considered along the Near Island Channel. On September 22, 2010 the Department met with the Director of Marine Operations, general manager, and staff to present the myriad of alternatives for terminal sites. All agreed that operating from two separate locations in Kodiak is undesirable (but not impossible) because duplicate staging, parking, and passenger amenities are required at both locations. Compliance with Homeland Security regulations is problematic at both existing terminals as they are multipurpose docks used by various vessels and are difficult to secure from the public. AMHS affirmed that the ideal objective for long -term development and service in Kodiak is to operate a single terminal that would serve both ferries, for exclusive use by AMHS, with ample uplands for secured vehicle check -in and screening. A preliminary project management plan was prepared and distributed on February 8, 2011 and a teleconference meeting was held on February 25, 2011 to discuss the direction of the project. Southeast Region (SER) and AMHS staff reaffirmed that a dedicated AMHS ferry terminal at the St. Paul Breakwater site is the preferred alternative; however, the estimated project cost for development of the St. Paul site is greatly in excess of current funding authorizations. A future funding plan would need to be established to ensure project delivery. SER staff subsequently discussed the project again with the AMHS leadership. Substantial increases in funding for this project are unlikely considering other AMHS needs and that less funding for capital improvements is anticipated in the future. As such, all feasible project alternatives should be evaluated and a dedicated AMHS facility is not affordable in view of the present project budget limitations. 2 • EVALUATION CRITERIA ' , v 2.1 Dual Vessel Facility Comparison and evaluation of potential ferry terminal development alternatives for a dedicated AMHS terminal suitable for both ferry vessels is based on the following criteria: • A single facility for exclusive use by AMHS that is accessible by both the Tustumena and Kennicott class vessels. • Upland staging and parking areas with vehicle capacity suitable for at least the Kennicott. (1,400 lane -ft required for the Kennicott / 650 lane -ft required for the Tustumena), short and long term parking (30- spaces desirable). Staging area enclosed within security fencing and concrete barrier /guardrail where required. Staging and parking areas paved with curb, gutters, storm drains, concrete sidewalks, striping, and lighting. • A site and marine facilities that can be readily adapted to suit Tustumena's potential replacement in the near future. • Transfer of vehicles via shipboard elevator or with a movable bridge and apron system. A movable bridge and apron system is preferred (or the ability to provide in -6- Kodiak Ferry Terminal Reconnaissance Engineering Study Update State Project No. 68938 the future) in order to increase speed and efficiency of loading and unloading of vehicles. • Mooring, tendering, and navigation structures as may be required for shore - assisted and /or vessel accessible line handling. • Passenger and AMHS personnel terminal building equipped with ticketing, waiting, office, storage, and public restroom areas. Building electrical, water, and sewer utilities. • Warehouse and storage space for restocking and maintenance of vessels. • Provision of vessel water, sewer utilities and electrical utilities but no on -site fuel storage facilities. • Minimum mooring depth at the berthing face and approach ways of at least -30 ft MLLW. 2.2 Single Vessel Criteria Improvements to one or both of the existing berthing locations and /or development of new sites to provide a better terminal facility for either vessel (separate locations) were also examined. Evaluation criteria for these considerations include: • Provision of adequate upland area and other enhancements to meet vehicle staging and parking needs for the particular vessel served. • Reduce congestion and improve safety for AMHS and other vessel activities in the vicinity of Pier 1. • Improve the efficiency of vehicle and cargo transfer by providing a transfer bridge where practical. • Provision of terminal and maintenance /storage buildings. 3; CONSIDERED'.; r� r ;',. ;gyp.= t The 2007 Reconnaissance Engineering Study selected the Near Island site as the preferred engineering alternative for a dual vessel use facility; however, the Kennicott's trial run demonstrated it was a poor choice for the larger ferry. In this engineering study update the Department developed additional alternatives at the St. Paul Harbor breakwater and considered again the alternatives at the LASH Dock and Pier 2. In addition, the Near Island site was reconfigured and new alternatives at Pier 1 and the City Transient Float were developed to serve only the Tustumena. This report identifies and analyzes a variety of feasible alternatives that accommodate one or both ferries at six different locations. Figure 3.1 shows the location of the study locations and their proximity to the community of Kodiak. The sites cannot be compared directly because each site cannot be developed identically. Each location or alternative accommodates different objectives. This alternatives analysis attempts to develop all feasible options, whether single or dual vessel use. -7- Kodiak Fer Terminal Reconnaissance Engineering Study Update State Project No. 68938 Refer to Appendix C for detailed project cost estimates and Appendix D for conceptual site plans of each terminal layout. Project costs and the relative pros and cons for each alternative are also listed directly on the plans contained in Appendix D. �, ' SF,E .2 d� N "F W� 1 ' ��6 � {� r t, '- t % Aa r Y r y Y " OOL v f te ur ca : ... Y ! -* a k. i iTa 4 4 .: c ` � ,r r�raj . i , '' ,,ry :, i ` "f 5 +� ,. r . ._ 7t 1?R l 1.�+� .241;+/.74;,..7 r .f, J- .I,Y.I ;t ( -,,w. " r{I , L � '' 4`* b ° , �a, ..A tt ' F y dw � t' f` t, ��++ iit , Doc ' 4 . 'a,� ' i ' m ' , �, i a/ # , +. � -•, � ti- v . .e n a hie: ,rd� � e -r+l * � ", C> 'S ti4 rles S 34, " % u 5 Harborc �� ."1.,-,4t r is r z ' b.k I n i &f + J g >: t , . , „ Break +vo4er`�r5rfe M t r f s # I r >, lk w\d . ° `i. a' 7 'e ,.,. v * gur t4 4 I .'jt� l r y l � : . " ; i " y 1 �'y " ` " 4,1 n '>' • l ,�tg �4', -. i` s "2 , r 4 t tr +t Tr t, 4 3 d ^ ' P •h.+: � �' :lt ',: ,e , r' ;'. 3 n 1 3 � 4' ' ''' 4ksS °� . ' ' ' �. `6 ' �'' v /' s ° S - y r 11. ` n - I e t? s : r }?.. d ` t.y � -, �e .�,, I Al t� ` $ ear I s l an d Sde ro .:',e.,. . r 1 � � �-$ F " '. rt �' T. '--• . `. � L til " r d X19 irq,.,,., ,ley , { 1' r _ a L , g rs . (, / - � , p"t��Pre l�Sire i $� i �•. j " • ,, n :, " i}+ air le t � T � L . , .- . 4 ( ti iL , CF/g ur�e 7� r t 0 v, - "-. r „� - , „ „ '5s , - , T r ons l �nl ,4 F/ , ' ,. 4 '' ' t.Fn S /,� ° , ' I s f .a' t 5 _ 1 yi., , . S $t„ i d, . . •Ar i p Q t +"` ¢ N a> il4 '�S .j • r m s /s` ` ' +tic g soh, z ' t "' d r x `kt `• ' .; xj ,ps 9 e 3 R t , ,3 .� )::.,: 1.. �'F!n � , n om t . � N a y j E a , z z k " � a . r } d 4.-. air t ,, � •,.�t ""; r l !'i' h ""� �...� C , - ,"" Lash> Doc 9rte w a ,5. y r t5 w " p v : ' 1 ^ ca / i\ eS2 Womensr Frgure, 5 4b,,...•,:-.. ra rw C tO a}!< a � °F �' +cd c .. r ...-.x f . ' �" :•'I. }c Figure 3.1 Ferry Term Sites 3.1 Near Island The Near Is land site, located just east of the north entrance to St. Herman Harbor initially appeare to satisfy all of AMHS's needs. It provided sufficient land area, had utilities nearby, and fur pro from wind and waves. However, its confined access made it suitable for the Tustumena only. This site can be develope fo r the Tust only and has an estimated project cost on the order of $11 million. The Ken would cont to use Pier 2 because it cannot safely access this location. Figures 2A and 2B in Appendix D show possible terminal configurations for the Tustumena. - 8 - Kodiak Ferry Terminal Reconnaissance Engineering Study Update State Project No. 68938 3.2 Pier 2 Pier 2 is a City of Kodiak owned facility located just west of the Kodiak city center on the northern shore of St. Paul Harbor. This platform dock was last renovated in 2005 and is the current mooring location for the Kennicott. Pier 2 is utilized by other commercial and private vessels. It is accessible by both AMHS vessels but its exposure to ocean swells can make it unsuitable for both ferries during adverse winter weather. This dock cannot be exclusively used by AMHS and scheduling conflicts with other dock users can occur unless carefully scheduled in advance. Other upland uses in this region also conflict with AMHS needs. Figures 3A, 3B and 3C in Appendix D show potential terminal improvements that could be developed at this site. The estimated project costs for these improvements range from $1.0 to $8.0 million depending on the extent of the proposed upgrades. 3.3 St. Paul Harbor Breakwater The St. Paul Harbor Breakwater site is located on the southern end of the breakwater protecting the small boat harbor. An embankment would be constructed on the west side of the breakwater over an existing shoal to develop areas for staging, parking, and a terminal building. An embankment paralleling the breakwater provides access from the terminal to the Kodiak road system. The site is located near the city center and other visitor amenities. Development of this location will be costly - requiring substantial quantities of in -water fill. The estimated project cost for development of a new ferry terminal at this location is in excess of $20.0 million. Figures 4A and 4B show potential terminal layouts for this location. This site best suits the purpose and need for a dedicated AMHS facility that would accommodate both vessels. 3.4 LASH Dock The LASH Dock is a privately owned cargo- transfer facility on the north shore of Womens Bay and is located approximately five road miles west of the Kodiak city center. This dock is an open cell bulkhead structure constructed of bare steel sheet piles. Womens Bay is sheltered from ocean conditions but is purported to occasionally form ice in the winter. Vessels enter the bay through a dredged channel from Chiniak Bay but the channel is not an impediment to either ferry. This location would be able to accommodate both vessels; however, the site has no visitor amenities nearby and lies outside of the Kodiak police and fire protection districts. There are no public sewer and water utilities. The western corner of the LASH Dock settled after construction but is reported to have been repaired. The steel sheet piles that form the bulkhead are freely corroding and will require costly cathodic protection. The uplands and dock are owned privately and purchase of the property and associated existing improvements will be required. Total costs are estimated between $12 -16 million which include purchase of the facility from the private owner(s). Figures 5A and 5B show possible terminal layouts that could be developed at this site. -9- Kodiak Feny Terminal Reconnaissance Engineering Study Update State Project No. 68938 3.5 City Transient Float The City Transient Float and Pier 1 are located on the north shore of the Kodiak North Entrance Channel; therefore, these sites are accessible by only the Tustumena. These two facilities are near the city center and only a short distance from many visitor amenities. The City Transient Float is a timber float used for short term moorage of small fishing and recreational boats. The shore line slopes steeply in this area and there is no room for staging or parking between the shore and the adjacent roadway. The float is located between a busy marine fuel dock and a fish processing plant. Figures 6A, 6B, 6C and 6D depict possible terminal layouts using sheet pile bulkheads or pile supported docks. Estimated construction costs are in the range of $15 -22 million. Upland and areas that would be gained by these alternatives are marginally adequate. 3.6 Pier 1 Pier 1 is as a City of Kodiak owned facility that is the present terminal for the Tustumena. It is a timber, horseshoe - shaped dock that is used by other vessels to transfer cargo and by a fuel barge to supply the bulk plant. The existing dock structure is comprised of heavy timber frame construction dating to the late 1960's. The City has routinely maintained the dock over years and it has been equipped with an adequate fender system. The length of the dock face is shorter than the Tustumena and it is flanked by a fish processor and marine fuel dock at either end. The dock is convenient to the city center but has very little area for parking and staging vehicles. The site is small with no room to expand onshore or towards the channel. Alternatives 7A and 7B in Appendix D show two possible terminal layouts that show replacement and expansion the exsting dock. These alternatives would greatly increase the available area for vehicle staging and parking, but may still not satisfy the space needs of the Tustumena at all times. Estimated project costs for these alternatives are $14.0 and $8.0 million. Alternative 7B best meets the project objectives considering the available project funding which is on the order of $7.0 million. 3.7 Summary of Alternative Costs A summary of the estimated project costs for all the alternatives considered is summarized in Table 3.1. The notation "T" or "K" under vessels served means Tustumena or Kennicott. The listed costs include environmental analysis, engineering design, construction administration and project construction and a 5- percent estimating contingency. Right of way or land acquisition costs are not included for any of the alternatives except for the LASH Dock which is privately owned. Right of way acquisition needs for the other alternatives are unknown at this time but should not be too excessive. - 10 - Kodiak Ferry Terminal Reconnaissance Engineering Study Update State Project No. 68938 LO TI } �s ALT DESCRIPTION') e ; » N y 3 • j ,' s � SERVED 6; COS x E NEAR ISLAND 2A BY CHANNEL T $11,000,000 NEAR ISLAND 2B AWAY FROM CHANNEL T $11,000,000 PIER 2 3A EXISTING DOCK K $1,000,000 PIER 2 3B NEW TRANSFER BRIDGE WEST SIDE T +K $6,000,000 PIER 2 3C NEW TRANSFER BRIDGE MIDDLE T +K $8,000,000 ST. PAUL 4A SIDE / STERN LOAD T +K $22,000,000 BREAKWATER ST. PAUL 4B PILE SUPPORTED SIDE / STERN LOAD T +K $27,000,000 BREAKWATER LASH DOCK 5A EXISTING SHEET PILE T +K $12,000,000 LASH DOCK 5B SHEET PILE DOCK/ NEW TRANSFER T +K $16,000,000 BRIDGE CITY TRANSIENT 6A SHEET PILE CELL, DOCK 1 T $22,000,000 FLOAT CITY TRANSIENT 6B SHEET PILE CELL, DOCK 2 T $22,000,000 FLOAT CITY TRANSIENT 6C FILL AND DOCK T $16,000,000 FLOAT CITY TRANSIENT 6D FILL AND DOCK T $17,000,000 FLOAT PIER 1 7A NEW ENLARGED DOCK T $14,000,000 PIER 1 7B MODIFY /ADD TO EXIST DOCK T $8,000,000 Table 3.1 - Total Project Costs 4 SUMMARY AND PREI!4IMINARY RECOMMENDATIONS • _ • LR A single, dedicated AMHS terminal facility would be the preferred alternative for improving ferry service in Kodiak if supported in future project funding plans. Ferry terminal improvements for a dedicated facility would accommodate AMHS ferries and have sufficient uplands to support vehicle parking, staging and security needs. These requirements are presently not met at the existing Pier 1 and Pier 2 sites. Additionally, the facility should be sited as close as possible to the existing business community and visitor amenities (near the town of Kodiak). Initial studies and community input indicated many positive attributes for the Near Island site; however, this location has proved to be insufficient for safe access by the Kennicott. Study efforts then focused on the St. Paul Breakwater site which meets the criteria for both vessels but has estimated project costs in excess of current funding allocations. The City of Kodiak then requested that the Department investigate other ferry service improvement possibilities that may be less cost and not necessarily a dedicated AMHS facility. As a result of this request, this study effort explores all feasible options that would provide an enhanced level of ferry service in Kodiak - whether dual or single ferry vessel use and /or at multiple locations. The St. Paul Breakwater site (reference Figures 4A and 4B in Appendix D) appears to be the most favorable location of the six locations evaluated in this report for a dual vessel facility. This site can be safely accessed and used by either the Kennicott or the Tustumena, offers the required upland area and is located near the community of Kodiak and existing business development. - 1 1 - Kodiak Ferry Terminal Reconnaissance Engineering Study Update State Project No. 68938 Future project funding plans do not include sufficient resources to construct a dedicated AMHS facility, so the alternative(s) to improve existing terminal operations should be pursued. The present federal funding source is authorized only for the community Kodiak. These funds cannot be used elsewhere. The alternative which probably best meets this purpose and need is the existing Pier 1 location reflected under Alternatives 7A and 7B in Appendix D. Primary service to Kodiak is provided by the Tustumena. The Tustumena has been berthed at Pier 1 for many years. The primary deficiency at Pier 1 is congestion from nearby development and lack of suitable staging and parking area. Expansion of nearby land areas is not possible to meet staging and parking needs. Expansion of the pile supported dock structure is therefore the only feasible alternative. Further evaluation with regard to making improvements at Pier 2 may also be in order as part of this project — or at least in the near future in the event that Pier 2 is to continue to be used as the primary port for the Kennicott. The existing Pier 1 and Pier 2 facilities are owned by the City of Kodiak. Improvements at either of these locations under this project will require a project agreement defining principal conditions in order to expend federal funds at this facility. This agreement (including 23 USC 129) should address, but may not be limited to, the following: • Maintenance and operations • No AMHS "use tariff' or "head -tax" for ferry traffic • Requirement that pier revenue must be deposited in a dedicated fund for pier maintenance and future capital improvements. • Establishment of priority use for scheduling and use by AMHS vessels The next stage of project progression is for the Department to determine a preferred alternative or direction for the project, establish a realistic funding plan and then request Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) approval to develop the environmental document and conduct further project development work in accordance with NEPA requirements. Additional preliminary engineering, inspections, surveying, and other relevant studies will be conducted as necessary to support the selection of the preferred alternative under the environmental document. The estimated project cost for the development of most of the alternatives evaluated in this report exceeds current federal funding authorizations. The projected AMHS funding levels versus overall system needs are presently inadequate to cover costs in excess of funding provided by the earmark. -12- Kodiak Fury Terminal Reconnaissance Engineering Study Update State Project No. 68938 B. REFERENCES Kodiak Marine Highway Terminal Study, SP Group Northwest Consultants, January 1982. Kodiak Ferry Terminal Environmental Assessment, Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities, 1986. Near Island Development Plan, Near Island Task Force, Walter E. Johnson, Chairman, March, 1987. Port of Kodiak Development Plan, Peratrovich & Nottingham, Inc., Kramer, Chin & Mayo, Inc., Williams - Kuebelbeck & Associates, Inc., Roy Ecklund, 1982. Reconnaissance Engineering Study, Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities, 2007. - 13 - APPENDIX A CORRESPONDENCE Miller, Kirk D (DOT) From: Tustumena Master [ master ©tustumena.dot.state.ak.us] Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 10:19 PM To: Miller, Kirk D (DOT) Cc: Master, Kennicott (DOT sponsored); Karvelas, Anthony G (DOT); Jensen, Dana H (DOT) Subject: Re: FW: 68938 - Kodiak Ferry Terminal / PMP & Recon Rept Attachments: Tusty Plans.pdf; Tusty Pier1 Kodiak from stern.JPG; Tusty Pier1 Kodiak.JPG; Tusty aft brow and vehicle ramp.JPG; master.vcf Hello Kirk: We've reviewed the St Paul Breakwater site plan onboard Tustumena and I have also gathered the input of Capt Bob Crowley (Tusty "B "crew) who is currently off work in Europe. Our consolidated comments follow. 1. The 4A /B site plan is the best alternative we have seen to date allowing moorage for both Kennicott and Tusty at a single location. It is a little more exposed to weather than our current Kodiak Pier 1 berth but that is a necessary tradeoff in order to allow both ships to operate from a single facility. The alignment of the berth looks good for dealing with the winter swell in St Paul Harbor. There is sufficient maneuvering room for Tustumena approaches and departures. 2. We slightly prefer Alternative 4A with the fill extending off the existing breakwater to the pile supported dock structure. The fill will better block the currents which move around the end of the breakwater and a fill structure will reduce the cross current effect when backing ships into the berth. 3. The pile supported dock structure proposed for Tustumena side loading raises some questions. Establishing the height and size of the platform will he critical in determining how Tusty will offload passengers. In Kodiak, where the Pier 1 deck height is19 ft, we use the passenger gangways located midships on each side of the ship at a +2.0 ft tide or higher. The pile supported dock structure you design must extend 140 feet forward from the stern of the ship in order to provide a platform alongside the ship on which the passenger gangway can land. See attached photos and ship plans. An alternative is to construct some sort of stair tower on the dock structure abeam Tustumena's stern so a small brow can be run across but this is an inferior means of moving passengers. Also, our vehicle elevator platform is technically not rated for passengers so that isn't a good option either. We much prefer using the midships gangways for passengers as they are our only means of egress even close to being ADA compliant. 4. Kodiak is a regular, weekly fueling stop for Tustumena, which will need to continue at this new facility. We load about 15 -20K gallons per week. For best spill prevention and maximum containment capability, I recommend a containment basin be located on the solid till portion of the Terminal site where the fuel truck can park and connect to a fuel header. The header would cross the pile supported dock structure to a location near where Tustumena's port side car door is located. Our onboard fueling station is immediately inside the car door. 1 Thanks for the opportunity to comment on this project. We'll be pleased to respond to your comments and questions at any time. Best regards. Capt Scott Merrill Tusty "A" crew Original Message From: Miller, Kirk D (DOT) Sent: Tuesday, Februarv- 15, 2011 3:42 PM To: 'Tustumena Master'; 'Kennicott Master' Cc: Karvelas, Anthony G (DOT) Subject: FW: 68938 - Kodiak Ferry Terminal / PMP & Recon Rept Captains, See below and attached. r forgot to send this Kodiak information your way when it distributed last week. I have attached the App D report: drawings. I an hoping to „et some comments by Feb 25. The recommended plan appears to be a dedicated facility suitable for both the Tustumena and the Kennicott located at the end of the St Paul Breakwater site (Alt 4), Let me know if you cannot receive or otherwise review any of the attachment files or if you need any further information. Kirk Miller, PP Marine Design Manager 2 Miller, Kirk D (DOT) From: Tustumena Master [ master @tustumena.dot.state.ak.us] Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 3:01 PM To: Potdevin, Jim (DOT) Cc: Miller, Kirk D (DOT); Hughes, Andrew N (DOT); Falvey, John F (DOT); vanKirk, Charles K (DOT) Subject: Re: 68938 - KDK FT Alts Attachments: master.vcf Greetings, Just some general comments. 1. The Tustumena does not want to use a modified SE ramp system. 2. Fig 2A and Fig 2B. I believe the exposure to wind is generally higher here than at our present berth. If only Tustumena is to use this berth then we do not need a transer bridge but a more standard dock with a deck to accomodate our transfer bridge, gangway and accomodation ladder. This is a port side to facility. This facility should be replanned for either port or starboard side to accomodate wind conditions for landing. 3. I would suggest that Fig 3C makes the most sense. It is similar to the old berth in downtown Juneau where the transfer bridge was built into the dock and allowed other vessels to moor alongside and allowed multi use. I would assume the Kennicott could moor port or starboard side to. Tustumena has no desire to shift to this berth. 4. Figure 4B. Is there no reason you could not do a 4C plan where you move the ships to the end of the breakwater side of that type of facility. In short, a berth similar to Fig 4A but using staging like 4B. The approach and departure would be more straightforward and avoid backing into the berth. It would therefore have to accomodate the Kennicott port side to. For Tustumena we would prefer a solid dock area to place our transfer bridge. 5. I don't really like the idea of the transit into Womens Bay and the Lash Terminal. 6. My preference would be Fig 6C or 6D. I would prefer the terminal bldg. to be place nearer the road and out of the way for vehicle movement. We don't need vehicles driving across the staging area to park at the terminal. As to the cons. • No transfer bridge desired or needed. • I can't imagine the "deep offshore bathymetry" is that severe. • Space is limited but doable. • design of lot must allow for maneuvering of trailers for backing onto the ship. • . I don't see any increased maintenance with this facility over the usual SE style configuration. If anything I would think the maintenance is less. 6. All locations would have to accomodate our aft brow gangway which is aft of the elevator transfer bridge. We need to use this on lower tides when our accom ladders are not suitable. Also, we need to be able to accomodate our accomodation ladders at whichever facility is chosen. I am constantly amazed how the configuration of docks that we use are so well suited (in most cases) to the prevailing conditions. Most of the battle is getting alongside a berth. I think in this day and age site selection is based on cost and not the operational needs of getting to and from the berth in most weather conditions. I can think of very few instances where we were not able to get alongside our berth in Near Is. Channel. The only conditions are when there is a lack of visibility. We never missed a docking the entire time they were buildiing the bridge across the channel. I know it must be frustrating trying to find a one size fits all" solution. Sometimes it just isn't possible. I would hope that we do not sacrifice what has been a stable and generally secure berth for one that has some pretty inherent difficulties. Surging and breaking lines at docks does not make for a secure and safe berth. I can tell by the price estimates that all eyes are on pier 2. My preference as previously noted is Opt 6 followed by Opt. 7. Opt 7 is limited by the Trident pier and the fuel dock. Thanks for listiening, Capt Crowley Capt Merrill will be here Tuesday and can add his input. Potdevin, Jim (DOT) wrote: Kirk — If you haven't done so already, hold off on contacting Kodiak until we get feedback from AMHS. AMHS might shorten the list. Jim From: Miller, Kirk D (DOT) Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 11:29 AM To: vanKirk, Charles K (DOT); Falvey, John F (DOT); Master, Tustumena (DOT sponsored); Master, Kennicott (DOT sponsored) Cc: Hughes, Andrew N (DOT); Potdevin, Jim (DOT) Subject: 68938 - KDK F t Alts Chuck, 2 • We have been working on updating the Kodiak Ferry Terminal alternatives...I put all of our alternative drawings that we have developed to date on a pdf file which can be downloaded from below ftp site. These drawings are not intended for public distribution but are for preliminary review and input. I am also discussing these alternatives with City of Kodiak in order to get their preliminary input as well. I am currently preparing an updated recon level report, but thought I would get preliminary input from AMHS prior to publishing an official draft. Andy has also expressed interest in meeting with AMHS to further discuss. Previous studies have primarily focused on a dual vessel, exclusive AMHS use type facility. The parameters for our current study efforts are any combination of single or dual use ferry terminal facilities that would provide an improved level of ferry service in Kodiak from both AMHS, City and public perspectives. At this juncture, we are not advocating any specific alternative or identifying a preferred alternative. Please download this file today and /or advise if you have any preliminary input on the attached concepts...I would like to get a draft report out for distribution sometime within the next few weeks. Thx for the assistance. Kirk ftp://ftp.state.ak.us/transfer/KDK%2OFT/ 3 From: Freed, Linda fmailto :Ifreed©citv.kodiak.ak.usj Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 9:39 PM To: Von Scheben, Leo (DOT) Cc: Richards, Frank T (DOT); Beedle, James R (DOT); Doggett, Timothy H (DOT); Winters, Victor M E (DOT); Savikko, Bern A (DOT); Falvey, John F (DOT); Ottesen, Jeffery C (DOT); Potdevin, Jim (DOT); Hughes, Andrew N (DOT); Stone, Cliff (LAA); Alan Austerman(calegis.state.ak.us; Matheny, Katrina M (LAA); Stevens, Gary L (LAA); Kniaziowski, Aimee; Owen, Martin; Weston, Howard; Rick Gifford Subject: new Kodiak Ferry Terminal Dear Commissioner VonScheben: Thank you so much for taking the time to meet with City of Kodiak representatives when we were in Juneau in February. This e -mail is a follow -up to that visit regarding the new Kodiak Ferry terminal. Kodiak has worked long and hard with the Alaska Department of Transportation to develop a new ferry terminal for Kodiak that meets both the needs of the community and the Alaska Marine Highway System. When we meet with you and your staff in February, a new concept plan (and location) for the Kodiak ferry terminal was presented. This terminal was designed around a road built atop the St. Paul Harbor breakwater. While this site meets AMHS's requirement to dock both the Kennicott and the Tustumena at the same facility, along with other hurdles, development of this site is projected to cost approximately $30 to $35 million. The City of Kodiak is very concerned that this facility has very little likelihood of ever being built due to its cost and in the process the federal money for a new Kodiak ferry terminal will largely be expended on design and environmental review, leaving little for construction of a very expensive facility. As a result, the Mayor and City Council discussed the possibility of requesting Congressman Young to reprogram these funds for other City transportation projects, but the City of Kodiak (as an island community) is dedicated to working with AMHS to bring the best ferry service we can to our community. After discussion with Congressional staff and Deputy Commissioner Beedle, it appears that there is a better, more cooperative option for dealing with the development of a ferry terminal in Kodiak. Commissioner Beedle confirmed for me, in a conversation late last week, that the Department and AHMS are committed to the same goal and are prepared to work with the City of develop a facility that is financial feasible and continues to provide good docking opportunities to AHMS vessels. The City of Kodiak believes that the best financial return on the funds that are currently available for this project would be to invest the funds in either a rebuild of Pier I (the current ferry terminal) and or new construction at the location of the City's channel transient float. Each of these options are good, viable terminal options for the Tustumena and based on their age and condition are in need of reconstruction. Using the money in this fashion means that the Kennicott will need to continue to dock at Pier II, which the City is prepared to accommodate, if we can work on early scheduling with AMHS. We understand that, if the available federal funds are used to implement one of these options that any revenue received by the City of Kodiak from facility fees needs to be dedicated to the new facility. This is not an issue for the City of Kodiak and we have recently completed a $4 million plus project with the FAA that had the same constraints and we have been able to meet all of the FAA's financial requirements. Moving in this direction we have come full circle. When the City of Kodiak urged the federal government to set aside money for a new Kodiak ferry terminal the site we had in mind, and advocated for, was the current channel transient float site. Based on Deputy Commissioner Beedle's assurances, the City of Kodiak looks forward to working with the State of Alaska to make a new ferry terminal a reality for Kodiak. The City of Kodiak would like to set up a meeting within the next month to work out the details of moving this project forward. I am please to be able to tell you that the contact for the City of Kodiak after April 30` is Amy Kniaziowski, the new Kodiak City Manager. Thank you so much for all your help with Kodiak transportation issues during the time you have been Commissioner. I am looking forward, in a few years, to being able board the Tustumena at a new dock in Kodiak. Respectfully, Linda Freed, City Manager C. Mayor and Council NOTE: The e-mail address Ifreedc city.kodiak.ak.us will be inactive after April 30th, as I am retiring from employment with the City of Kodiak. My home e-mail address is: freed@gci.net, if you want to contact me personally. On May 1st the City Manger's e-mail address will be: akniaziowski(d city.kodiak.ak.us. Linda L. Freed City Manager, City of Kodiak 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 99615 (907) 486-8640 (voice) (907) 486 -8600 (fax) (freed (citv.kod iak. ak. us Messages to and from this e-mail address may be available to the public under Kodiak City Code provisions and Alaska State Statutes. • M/V KENNICOT'T , o ' SJy ,lj��el 01^^�tt. State of Alaska MY11 MEMORANDUM �-_ e. ...- te `J n _. Date: 4/25/08 To: CaptJancauskas, Port Captain Capt. Jensen, Port Captain Cc: Mr. Chuck Van Kirk, Operations Manager Capt. J. Falvey, General Manager Capt Tustumena Kennicott Master File From: Captain Matthew Wilkens Subject: Proposed Kodiak Dock on Near Island On 4/23 the Kennicott departed Kodiak pier 2 to make a trial run in the area of the proposed Terminal on Near Island in Kodiak, per the request of Tim Dogget and Bern Saviko. Buoys were set up in the area of the proposed dock and a range was set up on shore to mark where the bridge wing would line up. The weather was about as perfect as you could get in Kodiak, winds 5 knots or less, clear visibility and an .8kt flood current behind us on the approach. There was minimal traffic in the vicinity of the channel. The approach to the proposed site was fairly strait forward. We of course didn't try to line up against the buoys, but maintained a position mid channel till our bridge wing lined up with the shore range. Even at center channel the vessels starboard side was fairly close to dock position, about 20 yards from where the dock would be. Once again, very little wind if any to set the vessel either way on the approach. The channel was cut off at that point, even with 60 feet to the right it would be tight. This would probably be a reasonable dock for either vessel (Kennicott or Tustumena) to approach in winds of 20 knots or less. There is no escape path once committed, except astern, if any miscalculation of set on the approach. The distance from the proposed dock to the breakwater across the channel is 380.5 feet, less than the Kennicott's length. I don't believe there is any other dock in the system for the Kennicott that is so limited in options. Even Yakutat and Seldovia have enough room for the vessel to spin off the dock if needed. Departing the berth is the main area of concern and the reason for writing this memo. While the Tustumena could lift off the dock and proceed down the channel, The Kennicott would be required to lift off the dock, get into center channel, and back out center channel until clear of buoy 11. It is then required to shift the stern to port 90 degrees and continue backing into St Paul Harbor until clear of the shoals on the Near Island side, mindful of the rock in St Paul Harbor and turn the vessel another 120 degrees or more to clear the buoys in St Paul Harbor outbound. This is quite a ship handling feat in calm clear weather, requiring a good deal of power to get things moving. To do so in a strong wind (over 20 knots) setting in line with the channel, a fairly frequent winter time (September through April) event, makes it an increasingly hazardous operation for the Kennicott. The Kennicott has too much sail area to be placed in a position of trying to back out, alter course at least 90 degrees while backing, and maintain a safe distance off the shoals of Near Island or the breakwater/ Buoy 11 on the town side (which can not be seen easily from the bridge until very close). The difficulty of avoiding this will greatly depend on wind and current, but departing on an ebb current with a strong SW to NE wind will provide the solid basis of an error chain leading to a grounding or allission. I will provide several photos, including TRANSAS pictures showing the vessel approach and departure. The TRANSAS photos give a clear indication of vessel set toward the shoal area while backing. Please note the considerable amount of mud stirred up by the bow thruster in Near Island channel in the photos. The original design of having the Kennicott back in for a port side approach would be equally as bad. I strongly urge the management of AMHS to choose another option, by either doing nothing as the preferred option or building the dock on the town side west of the small boat harbor. I understand there is a 7 million dollar difference which we don't have, but we don't have the funds for repairing damaged vessels either. I believe the Near Island proposed Dock would not be a safe option for the Kennicott in any but the very kindest Kodiak weather. APPENDIX B FEDERAL FUNDING DOCUMENTS I H. R. 3_909 Highway Projects High Priority Projects — Continued No. State Project Description Amount 2452 GA Replace sidewalks, upgrade lighting in down- town Vidalia $400,000 2453 MN Construct bicycle and pedestrian trails in Cuyuna Recreation Area $700,000 2454 HI Construct Kapaa Bypass $2,400,000 2455 FL Temple Terrace Highway Modification $1,600,000 2456 TN Widen Interstate 240 from Poplar Avenue (SR 57) to near Walnut Grove Road (SR 23) East of Memphis, Shelby County 8800,000 2457 IL For the Village of Woodridge to resurface - Internationale Parkway $86,400 2458 OR I -5 Trade Corridor, Portland, Oregon to Van- couver, Washington segment $4,220,000 2459 GA Streetscape, Pedestrian Improvements in City '.x r. i Center, City of Clarkston $4,000,000 2460 KY Widen KY 1991 from Maysville Road to Mid- land Trail Industrial Park, Montgomery County $1,000,000 2461 NC Construct new Route from Beach Drive (SR 1104) to NC 211 in Brunswick County 53,200,000 2462 NJ International Trade and Logistics Center Roadway Improvements at Exit 12 of the New Jersey Turnpike, Carteret $1200,000 2463 IL Interstate 41 and Route 176 Interchange re- placement $600,000 2464 MA Northern Avenue Bridge rehabilitation, Boston $2,400,000 2465 AK Planning, design, and construction of Knik Arm Bridge $151,000,000 2466 IN North Calumet Avenue Improvements, Valparaiso 8960,000 2467 OR [- 205/Highway 213 interchange improvements $800,000 2468 TN Improving Vehicle Efficiencies at highway At- Grade Railroad Crossing in Loudon, TN $45,600 2469 AZ Design, right -of -way acquisition, and construc- tion I -10 Collector Distributor Roadway from 40th Street to Baseline Maricopa County, Arizona $3,200,000 2470 LA Improvements to LA 42 in Ascension Parish; and LA 73 improvements in Ascension Par- ish $8,000,000 2471 MN Construct Paul Bunyan trail from Mississippi River Bridge Trail to Crow Wing State Park $775,000 2472 MN Construct Mesabi Trail from Grand Rapids to City of Ely $2,700,000 \ 2473 GA Install sidewalks on Highway 23 from Dykes \4. Street to Sarah Street, Cochran 8300,000 2474 AK Kodiak, AK Construction of AMHW ferry ter- minal and approach $7,500,000 2475 OK Reconstruction of SH 66 from Craig and Rog- ers Counties to SH 66 and U.S. 60 intersec- tion $800,000 2476 CA Enhance pedestrian environment and increase safety along Olympic Blvd. between Vermont and Western Avenues, Los Angeles 81,600,000 2477 NY Enhancement of the Michigan Avenue Cor- ridor, Buffalo $1,600,000 2478 NJ Kapkowski Road Area Improvements in Eliza- beth $4,560,000 2010 -2013 Alaska Statewide Transportation Improvement Program Revision 14 Incorporated Need ID: 2045 Region: Marine Highways Place Name: Kodiak 1. } ` M z �J Title: + ! 9 .: r ..._;1‘,5, , s., Kodiak: Construct New Ferry Terminal t Y .� � ���1 � , .� '.rx 9r lx y}. �xg ,�.I�K.. Project Description: k Build a new AMHS ferry terminal at Kodiak. - u . « , p t S=t *: ` , rs .:i` � � r S j t ts i- tr y s_ W x� .. � �..� G al. F }pg tX Q _. T'M vn i -t.^c Z' i ^� J .. �F � k; .- PHASE FUNDING FFY10 FFY11 FFY12 FFY13 After FFY13 All amounts x1,000 dollars Design HPRL 181.9 272.9 0 0 Design SM 18.1 27.1 0 0 Right of Way HPRL 0 909.7 0 0 Right of Way SM 0 90.3 0 0 Construction HPRL 0 0.0 4,919.5 0 Construction SM 0 0.0 488.3 0 Utilities HPRL 0 0.0 91.0 0 Utilities SM 0 0.0 9.0 0 Totals: 200.0 1,300.0 5,507.8 0.0 0.0 Program Type: FERR Election District(s): Primary Work: Ferry Boats 36 Secondary Work: PEB Score: Criteria: Special Financial: Earmark N/A Project Status Year Borough /Census Area: Project Start: 2006 Kodiak Island Borough Environmental Clearance: Construction Funded: Municipal Planning Organization (MPO): Right of Way Authorized: non -MPO Average AADT: Sponsor: DOT &PF Pavement Rating: N/A Predominant Functional Class: Unclassified 25 October 2010 Kodiak Island Borough p. 115 STIP 2006 -2009 Alaska Statewide Transportation Improvement Program Amendment 18 Approved Need ID: 2045 Region: Marine Highways ° -r Place Name: KODIAK ' 4;.' " Y, 5 . n T te I . ;4 :4) MARINE HIGHWAY Terminal: Kodiak Construct New 9 4+ I i "3Larc . � G Terminal ' � { , ' " k ti �3''�' , wt Project Description: <a� x e w t " Build a new AMHS ferry terminal at Kodiak. y p � - - ma , .Oi :: T _ ' � ! ilk N ye 4 t ,r* 3 _5,v + ......:5n v- e 'LC.•i. .dn i,F - .3u ..i1'me^ st '3 '^n . PHASE FUNDING FFY09 ;:yQftee4F All amounts x1,000 Design HPRL 273.0 Design SM 27.0 Right of Way HPRL 773.3 Right of Way SM 76.7 Construction FBDA 6,353.7 Construction HPRL 5,055.8 Construction SM 2,090.5 Utilities HPRL 91.0 Utilities SM 9.0 Totals: 14,750.0 r,� 7 -m00 , err. Program Type: FERR Election District(s): Primary Work: Ferry Boats 36 Secondary Work: PEB Score: Criteria: Special Financial: Earmark N/A Project Status Year Borough /Census Area: Project Start: 2006 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH Environmental Clearance: Construction Funded: Municipal Planning Organization (MPO): Right of Way Authorized: non -MPO Average AADT: Sponsor: DOT &PF Pavement Rating: N/A Predominant Functional Class: Unclassified 20 May 2009 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH p. 81 S T�13 2004 -2006 STIP Ferry Boat Program final Amendment # 8 Req'd Need Funding ID Location Project Description /Funding Source Phse Apprn FFY 05 FFY 06 >FFY06 13879 Haines Terminal: Haines Improvements 2 100.0 Replace failing sheetwall with new mooring dolphins. Conduct recon to scope berthing 3 requirements. Add second berth for stern /bow loading for Haines /Skagway shuttle ferry. Project combines Haines terminal mods (13879) and Haines Ferry Dock 10.0 4 300.0 4,000.0 Federal NHS 100.0 Federal FBDA 240.0 3,200.0 State 70.0 800.0 Other Project Total 410.0 4,000.0 0.0 9844 Ketchikan Terminal: Ketchikan Lay -Up Berth and Mooring Structures 2 300.0 Locate suitable site and construct floating dock, bridges, and mooring structures for simultaneous lay -up of AMHS vessels. 3 310.0 7 10.0 4 6400.0 Federal NHS 272 Federal TRANS 576675 State 0.0 1,680.fi Other Project Total 0.0 7,020.0 0.0 2045 Kodiak Terminal: Kodiak Ferry Terminal (new construction) 2 100.0 Build a new ferry terminal at Kodiak. 3 7 4 Federal NHS 0.0 91.0 State 0.0 9.0 Other Project Total 0.0 100.0 10,800.0 Phases: 2- design; 3 -right of way; 4- construction; 7- Utilities; 8- planning and research Ferry 5 2/1/2005 ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC FACILITIES PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORIZATION • AKSAS #: 68938 PROJECT NAME: KODIAK FERRY TERMINAL (AK091) CONTACT: B. SAVIKKO ■ LEDGER CODE: 302702 DIVISION: D&ES PDA#: 2 FEDERAL #: HPRL- 0003(109) MODE: MARINE 79492 STRUCTURE BATCH: 2106017 PFD/RS #: 2431632 NEED ID 4: 2045 REGION: SOUTHEAST FINANCIAL BATCH: 2.1102T PDA AR #: 82263 PROJECT SCOPE: PROVIDE A NEW FERRY TERMINAL IN KODIAK DEDICATED TO ALASKA MARINE HIGHWAY (AMHS) VESSELS AND OPERATIONS. T IS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE A NEW TRANSFER BRIDGE AND MOORING STRUCTURES FOR ROLL ON -ROLL OFF CAPABILITY FOR AMHS VESSELS AND A DEDICATED STAGING AND PARKING AREA AND TERMINAL BUILDING . BY: MW AL !ION Fit 11 EF inrI2EASE PHASE 2 FUNDING TO COVER COSTS OF AN EXTENDED ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS TO COMPLETE THE ENVIRONMENTAL FAA GRANT INFORMATION n0'UMENT. ESTABLISH FYO7 FUNDS IN PHASE 1 FOR CONSTRUCTION. FAA GRANT DATE: , PRE - DESIGN ENGINEER FM GRANT: _ PRE- CONST. ENGINEEQ' N ODIFIED AGREEMENT IS REQUESTED FM MAX ALLOWED. . CURR. PROG. A :CQ77iii " i�Sa�Y� . MMARY (FHWA) _ f . ENVIRONMENTAL PR= LIMINARY ENGINEERING RIGHT OF WAY CON TRUCTION U ILIT ES RIGHT OF WAY RP • onnaissance Study: 11/14/2005 — UTILITIES PE thru Environ. Doc. Appr: Appraise & Acquire: CONST.ENGINEER C thru Final PS &E: ATP with Construction: Relocation: - - Find PS &E thru Award: CONST. ADMIN. 'crMAIfiLENGINEEB ;:, r, .,: ... _; .• -,, .:�:::.: MmnT. ADMIN. # ASE 2 SUMMARY PHASE 3 SUMMARY PHASE 4 SUMMARY PHASE 7 SUMMARY PLANNING Sh rt Date 11/14/2005 Start Date Start Date Start Date F C��$$off Date 12/31/2010 Cutoff Date Cutoff Date Cutoff Date eral Ratio 90.97% Federal Ratio Federal Ratio Federal Ratio C location Code 24433019 Collocation Code Collocation Code Collocation Code Ledger Code 302702 -21,22 Ledger Code Ledger Code Ledger Code PARTICIPATING NON -PAR PARTICIPATING NON -PAR PARTICIPATING NON -PAR PARTICIPATING NON -PAR PRIOR TOTAL: $200,000.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - Moo $0.00 $0•0'' CHANGE $200,000.00 H $0.00. • "• , ,;: , ; $0.00 $0:00 $0.00 ! $0.00 •: $0.00 $0.00?.. TOTAL: $400,000.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.0D $0.00 $0.00 PHASE 2 TOTAL: $401,000.00 PHASE 3 TOTAL: $0.00 PHASE 4 TOTAL; $0.00 PHASE 7 TOTAL: $0.00 FEDERAL GF /IARF PHASE 1 TOTAL $6,375,000.00 $0.00 TOTAL AUTH. $6,776,000.00 --;:ii., , 1i A ..i sl .#. 6 iv at 1I. MAY 20 2008 ••OJ`t. � � at./ 7 1 II D VIS i ,... 7 •=�G 7 DEV LO" -t YOVa) � sl 2/os FKWAAPP. i y }2/6;,...., j i // a r is e I Sir �R ®C ® _ 61iE1og RE oNALPR CO ST C 0 "EN E - R -- DA _ DATEPROCESSE TO BE COMPLETED BY FHWA • MONTHLY TRANSACTION NUMBER MODIFICATION OF FEDERAL -AID ,date O S 4 PROJECT AGREEMENT AND Alaska Standard Place Code (FIPS data) APPROVAL/AUTHORIZATION Federal Project No. 40950C U.S. Department of Transportation HPRL- 0003(109) County T FHWA Area Federal Highway Administration State Project No. 150 X -3 _ 68938 PROJECT TERMINI: DUNS #617616495 Kodiak, Alaska Section 1102 Demo #AK091 NBI #1425 INVENTORY ROUTE NUMBER: NIA MILEPOINT: B. Reason for Modification IX] Urban Functional System U Federal -Aid System g iLength: (Mlles) 0.1 A. Provide a new ferry terminal in Kodiak dedicated to Alaska Marine Highway System (AMHS) vessels and operations. This project will provide a new transfer bridge and mooring structures for roll on -roll off capability for AMHS vessels and a dedicated staging and parking area and terminal building. B. Additionatfunding is requested to co - er co/Ig4EpGN:drmded vironmental process to complete the Environmental Document. - Authority to Proceed through Environme ttal DaLur,l..,,t P,u.ul -• received 09/06/2006.. PRE - DESIGN ENGINEER The Project Agreement for the abe\ e-refeilgrOitidtiftisititte tered into between the undersigned parties and executed by the Divisio 1 yrdrpg 11AGER November 14, 2005 is hereby modified as follows: ENVIRONMENTAL • n Code Federal Funds Total Estimated Cost RIGHT OE WAY Y10 363,880.00 401,000.00 _- UTILITIES CONST. ENGINEER CONST. ADMIN. MAINZ ENGINEER • Estimated total cost of pnie ADMIN - 363,880.00 401,000.00 REQUESTAUTHORITY TO PROCEED FCR FUR BWMUNtlQDER CERTI ICATION ACCEPTANCE 11 EXEMPT EFFECTIVE DATE ` econnais ance Study [] Final PS &E PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING tal Document Approval RIGHTS -OF -WAY 11 • • - — cnd Acquisitions fl Utility Relocation CONSTRUCTION [i HIGHWAY PLANNING & RESEARCH (HP &R) n OTHER [] ATTACHMENTS: [X] COST ESTIMATE []MAP [X[ SUPPORTING DATA [] CERTIFICATION CHECKLIST REMARKS: (FWHA use only) Environmental Document Approval STIP [ Date NEED ID: 2045 SECTION: FBP STIP /PAGE NO: 06 -08 STIP pg 94 RECOMMENDED BY OPERATIONS ENGINEER 0 Draft Amend # 17 / Pg 82 / NAME: Kodiak: Terminal: Kodiak Construct New Terminal. / � ,. ,S 217Q7 ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE PROJECT AGREEMENT WILL REMAIN IN FULL F• CE AND EFFECT. State of Alaska, Department of Transportation U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and Public Facilities FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION (Official name of Highway Agency) t By ,2v..1 p . ., • (Division Administrator) DOT &PF /Authorized Agent Date Executed D •?.• 2 L� ATP -PR -2A 11/94 ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC FACILITIES PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORIZATION AKSAS #: 68938 PROJECT NAME: KODIAK FERRY TERMINAL (AK091) CONTACT: B. SAVIKKO LEDGER CODE: 302702 DIVISION: D &ES PDA #: J ' FEDERAL #: HPRL- 0003(109) MODE: MARINE 79492 STRUCTURE BATCH: N/A PFD /RS #: 2431632 NEED ID #: 2045 REGION: SOUTHEAST FINANCIAL BATCH: ',d PDA AR #: 82263 PROJEC SCOPE: PROVIDE A NEW FERRY TERMINAL IN KODIAK D DICATED TO ALASKA MARIN HIGHWAY (AMHS) VESSELS AND OPERA IONS. THIS •ROJECT WILL PROVIDE A NEW TRANSFER BRIDGE AND MOORING STRUCTURES FOR ROLL ON -ROLL OFF CAPABILITY FOR AMHS VESSELS AND A DEDICATED STAGING AND PARKING AREA AND TERMINAL BUILDING. BY: MW A Rent IFSTFn. IN REASE PHASE 2 TO FUND PE THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT APPROVAL AND EXTEND THE CUTOFF DATE. FUNDS ARE FAA GRANT INFORMATION PRE- DESIGN CHIEF F• IM FY05 AND FY06 ALLOCATIONS. FAA GRANT DATE: PRE - DESIGN ENGINEER FM GRANT: ' W /PE THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT APPROVAL IS REQUESTED FM MAX ALLOWED: PRE- CDNST. ENGINEER CURR. PROG FUT IC WITERfi t9 .1.:• MMARY(FHWA) '< ENVIRONMENTAL - : ELIMINARY ENGINEERING RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRUCTION UTILITIES RIGHT OF WAY R:connaissance Study: 11/14/2005 UTILITIES •: thru Environ. Doc. Appr: <tie hook Appraise & Acquire: P1 ihru Final PS &E: ATP with Construction: Relocation: CDNST. ENGINEER Fi. al PS &E thru Award: CONST. ADMIN. MAINZ ENGINEER • P, ASE 2 SUMMARY PHASE 3 SUMMARY PHASE 4 SUMMARY PHASE 7 SUMMARY . MAINZ ADMIN. PLANNING S :rt Date 11/14/2005 Start Date Start Date Start Date C. toff Date 12/31/2010 Cutoff Date Cutoff Date Cutoff Date F:deral Ratio 90.97% Federal Ratio Federal Ratio Federal Ratio Gdlocation Code 24433019 Collocation Code Collocation Code Collocation Code Ledger Code 302702 -21,22 Ledger Code Ledger Code Ledger Code PARTICIPATING NON -PAR PARTICIPATING NON -PAR PARTICIPATING NON -PAR PARTICIPATING NON -PAR PRIOR TOTAL: '100000.00 c 1,000.00 •,000 '.0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 ' $0.00 CHANGE $100,000.00. O;OD $0'00 .. $0.00 $0.00 $0:00 $0.00.F .$0.00 TOTAL: $200,000.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 PHASE 2 TOTAL: $201,000.00 PHASE 3 TOTAL: $0.00 PHASE 4 TOTAL: 0.00 PHASE 7 TOTAL: $0.00 FEDERAL GF /IARF 'HASE 1 TOTAL $0.00 $0.00 SEP 0 6 2006 FOTAL AUTH. $201,000.00 FHWAApproval RCVG I :R ime TCONTROL DA E DIVISION OF PROGRAM D ELOPMENT DATE _ _ �_ _� PROCESSED q���Ioa EGO ' L Plr CO • •CTIO ENGINEER D E DATE PROCESSED TO BE COMPLETED BY FHWA MODIFICATION OF FEDERAL -AID MONTHLY TRANSACTION NUMBER PROJECT AGREEMENT State 09-1! AND Alaska Standard Place Code (FIPS data) APPROVAL /AUTHORIZATION Federal Project No. 40950C HPRL 0003(109) County FHWA Area U.S. Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Adninistratton State Project No. 150 X -3 i 68938 PROJECT TERMINI: DUNS #617616495 Kodiak, Alaska Section 1702 Demo #AK091 NBI #1425 INVENTORY ROUTE NUMBER: N/A MILEPOINT: B. Reason for Modficafion (X) Urban Functional System 0 Federol-Ald System 0 Length: (Miles) 0.1 A Provide a new ferry terminal in Kodiak dedicated to Alaska Marine Highway System (AMHS) vessels and operations. This project will provide a new transfer bridge and mooring structures for roll on -roll off capability for AMHS vessels and a dedicated staging and parking area and terminal building. B. Revise scope to the-eb. - , AJJitio „al funding and authority is requested to proceed with PE through Environmental Document Approval. PRE -DESIGN CHIEF PRE - DESIGN ENGINEER The Project Agreement t t , 692,v, te project entered into between the undersigned obint parties and execu ed -b i S dr�inlstrator on November 14, 2005 is hereby modified a� foI�C7N�3FERING MANAGER ENVIRONMENTAL Appn Code Federal Funds Total Estimated Cost RIGHT OF WAY HY10 181,940.00 201,000.00 UTILITIES CONST. ENGINEER CONST. ADMIN. MAINE ENGINEER Rr�NI Estimate 11A��IN Or projtct 181,940.00 201,000.00 REQUEST AUTHORITY T ER CERTIFICATION ACCEPTANCE () EXEMPT EFFECTIVE DATE PLANNING Q Reconnaissance Study 0 Final PS &E PRELIMINARY ENG NEE ING (X) Environmental Document Approval SEP - 6 2006 RIGHTS -OF -WAY r 0 Appraisals and Acquisitions 0 Utility Relocation CONSTRUCTION 0 HIGHWAY PLANNING & RESEARCH (HP &R) 0 OTHER 0 ATTACHMENTS: (X) COST ESTIMATE (X) MAP (X) SUPPORTING DATA 0 CERTIFICATION CHECKLIST REMARKS: (FWHA use only) Environmental Document Approval STIP ( Date NEED ID: 2045 SECTION: FOP STIP /PAGE NO: 06-05 STIP pg 94 RECOMMENDED BY OPERATIONS ENGINEER NAME: Kodak: Terminal: Kodiak Construct New Terminal, ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE PROJECT AGREEMENT WILL REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT. State of Alaska, Department of Transportation U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and Public Facilities FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION (Official name of Highway Agency) o By l l p-�L / y 7pr 'vision Admittrot ) DOT &PF /Authorized Agent Date Executed QT/4/2 ATP -PR -2A 11/94 1 G ir m:+n % Y•.. . i, ","O rw. !rat•'- v. � . .7 N r. ' ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC FACILITIES . PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORIZATION AKSAS #: 68938 PROJECT NAME: KODIAK FERRY TERMINAL CONTACT: B. SAVIKKO . LEDGER CODE: 302702 DIVISION: D &ES PDA #: ORIGINAL FEDERAL #: MODE: MARINE 79492 STRUCTURE BATCH: 1876921 PFD /RS #: 2431632 NEED ID 44: 2045 REGION: SOUTHEAST FINANCIAL BATCH: PDA AR #: 82263 PROJECT SCOPE: RECONNAISSANCE STUDY FOR SITES AND DESIGNS FOR A NEW KODIAK FERRY TERMINAL THAT WILL BE AMHS- DEDICATED AND ACCOMMODATE BOTH THE MN TUSTUMENA AND THE MN KENNICOTT. BY: MW ACTION REQUESTED: FUND PHASE 2 AND ESTABLISH A CUTOFF DATE. FUNDS ARE FROM FY05 ALLOCATIONS. FAA GRANT INFORMATION FM GRANT DATE: ATP VV/PE-RECONNAISSANCE STUDY IS REQUESTED FAA GRANT: FM MAX ALLOWED: CURR. PROG.: AUTHORITYTO PROCEED SUMMARY (FHWA) PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRUCTION UTILITIES / Reconnaissance Study: ' PE thru Environ. Doc. Appr: Appraise & Acquire: PE thru Final PS &E: - ATP with Construction: Relocation: Final PS &E thru Award: PHASE2SUMMARY PHASE 3 SUMMARY PHASE4SUMMARY PHASE7SUMMARY Start Date Start Date Start Date Start Date Cutoff Date 11/30/2008 Cutoff Date Cutoff Date Cutoff Date Federal Ratio 90.97% Federal Ratio Federal Ratio Federal Ratio Collocation Code 24433019 Collocation Code Collocation Code Collocation Code Ledger Code 302702 -21,22 Ledger Code Ledger Code Ledger Code I PARTICIPATING NON -PAR PARTICIPATING NON -PAR - PARTICIPATING NON -PAR PARTICIPATING NON -PAR I PRIOR TOTAL: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 I CHANGE $100,00000 $1,000!00 $O :33 i $0 :00 $0.00 $0,.00 $0.00: ::$0.00.. TOTAL: $100,000.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 PHASE 2 TOTAL: $101,000.00 PHASE 3 TOTAL: $0.00 PHASE 4 TOTAL: $0.00 PHASE 7 TOTAL: $0.00 FEDERAL GF /IARF PHASE 1 TOTAL $0.00 $0.00 TOTAL AUTH. $101,000.00 " "�" "^ ' f ` \ ort/ a . 9 6r5/'-'0 , \ tp tt & ` . . LL `� ' •0J Q CON 'R' DATE jttFl C%' p DIVISION OF PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT- • DATE LI /l / o ,37 Os J REGIONAL PRE ONSTRUCTION ENGINEER DATE DATE PROCESSED u ro �,., ,;:1.9 - CONST RUC-• \,ci, ti•r _ if u APPENDIX C PROJECT COST ESTIMATES SE Region - Marine Engineering Project Construction Cost Estimate - 1/4/2011 PROJECT NUMBER: 68938 PROJECT TITLE: Kodiak Ferry Terminal WORK DESCRIPTION: NEAR ISLAND - ALTERNATE 2A Item Total No Item Unit No Rqd Unit Qty Unit Price Quantity Amount 201(1) Clearing and Grubbing LS 1 1 520,000 1 $20,000 203(1) Unclassified Borrow CY 1 1,500 $25 1,500 $37,500 203(2) Riprap CY 1 5,000 $80 5,000 5400,000 203(3) Unclassified Excavation CY 1 20,000 $15 20,000 5300,000 301(1) Aggregate Base Course (12" thick) CY 1 3,500 $25 3,500 $87500 401(1) Asphalt Concrete (4 " thick - 145 pcp) Tons 1 2,500 $100 2,500 5250,000 501(1) Concrete Bridge Abutment LS 1 1 $25,000 1 $25,000 504(1) Cathodic Protection System (Anodes) LS 1 1 575,000 1 $75,000 504(2) Fender Lead -In Mooring Structure EA 1 2 $400,000 2 $800,000 504(3) Fender Mooring Structure EA 1 4 5300000 4 $1,200,000 504(4) Steel Access Catwalk EA 1 4 $80,000 4 $320,000 504(5) 130' Pedestrian Gangway LS 1 1 5200,000 1 $200,000 504(6) 130' Steel Transfer Bridge LS 1 1 5900000 1 $900,000 504(7) Bridge Lift or Float Support System LS 1 1 51 000,000 1 51,000,000 603(1) Storm Drain System LS 1 1 540,000 1 540,000 606(1) Metal Beam Guardrail LF 1 700 $55 700 538,500 607(1) Pedestrian Barrier Rail LF 1 200 $115 200 523,000 608(1) Concrete Sidewalk SY 1 70 $50 70 $3,500 609(1) Concrete Curb LF 1 1,500 $45 1,500 $67,500 626(1) Sanitary Sewer Utilities LS 1 1 $200,000 1 $200,000 627(1) Potable Water Utilities LS 1 1 5200,000 1 $200,000 640(1) Mobilization 1 Demobilization LS 1 1 5650,000 1 5650000 642(1) Construction Surveying LS 1 1 $150,000 1 $150,000 644(1) Workers Meals & Lodging or Per Diem LS 1 1 525,000 1 525,000 662(1) Electrical Lighting & Power LS 1 1 $400,000 1 $400,000 670(1) Painted Traffic Markings LS 1 1 $40,000 1 $40,000 670(2) Terminal Bldg SF 1 3,000 $225 3,000 $675,000 670(3) Warehouse SF 1 720 $150 720 $108,000 Item Totals = $8,235,500 Construction & Estimating Contingencies © 5% = $411,775 Construction Administration © 15 %= $1,235,325 Construction Total = $9,882,600 ICAP @ 4.79 % = $473,377 Project Totals = $10,355,977 SE Region - Marine Engineering Project Construction Cost Estimate - 1/4/2011 PROJECT NUMBER: 68938 PROJECT TITLE: Kodiak Ferry Terminal WORK DESCRIPTION: NEAR ISLAND - ALTERNATE 2B Item Total No Item Unit No Rqd Unit Qty Unit Price Quantity Amount 201(1) Clearing and Grubbing LS 1 1 $20,000 1 520,000 203(1) Unclassified Borrow CY 1 14,000 $25 14,000 $350,000 203(2) Riprap CY 1 5,500 $80 5,500 5440,000 203(3) Unclassified Excavation CY 1 17,000 $15 17,000 $255,000 301(1) Aggregate Base Course (12" thick) CY 1 4,500 $25 4,500 5112 500 401(1) Asphalt Concrete (4" thick - 145 pcf)) Tons 1 3,000 $100 3,000 5300,000 501(1) Concrete Bridge Abutment LS 1 1 $25,000 1 $25,000 504(1) Cathodic Protection System (Anodes) LS 1 1 575,000 1 $75,000 504(2) Fender Lead -In Mooring Structure EA 1 2 $400,000 2 5800 000 504(3) Fender Mooring Structure EA 1 4 5300,000 4 51,200,000 504(4) Steel Access Catwalk EA 1 4 $80,000 4 5320,000 504(5) 130' Steel Transfer Bridge L5 1 1 5900000 1 5900,000 504(6) 130' Pedestrian Gangway LS 1 1 5200,000 1 5200,000 504(7) Br dge Litt or Float Support System LS 1 1 $1,000,000 1 51 000,000 603(1) Storm Drain System LS 1 1 540,000 1 $40,000 606(1) Metal Beam Guardrail LF 1 800 $55 800 $44,000 607(1) Pedestrian Barrier Rail LF 1 250 $115 250 $28,750 608(1) Concrete Sidewalk SY 1 70 $50 70 $3,500 609(1) Concrete Curb LF 1 2,000 $45 2,000 $90,000 626(1) Sanitary Sewer Utilities LS 1 1 5200,000 1 5200,000 627(1) Potable Water Utilities LS 1 1 $200,000 1 $200,000 640(1) Mobilization / Demobilization LS 1 1 5650,000 1 5650,000 642(1) Construction Surveying LS 1 1 5150,000 1 5150,000 644(1) Workers Meals & Lodging or Per Diem LS 1 1 $25,000 1 $25,000 662(1) Electrical Lighting & Power LS 1 1 $400,000 1 $400,000 670(1) Painted Traffic Markings LS 1 1 540,000 1 540,000 670(2) Terminal Bldg SF 1 3,000 $225 3,000 5675,000 670(3) Warehouse SF 1 720 5150 720 5108 000 Item Totals = 58,651,750 Construction & Estimating Contingencies @ 5 %= $432,588 Construction Administration @ 15% = $1,297,763 Construction Total = 510,382,100 ICAP @ 4,79% = 5497 303 Project Totals = 510,879,403 SE Region - Marine Engineering Project Construction Cost Estimate - 1/4/2011 PROJECT NUMBER: 68938 PROJECT TITLE: Kodiak Ferry Terminal WORK DESCRIPTION: PIER 2 - ALTERNATE 3A Item Total No Item Unit No Rqd Unit Qty Unit Price Quantity Amount 401(1) Staging Area Surface Improvements and Lane Striping LS 1 1 $10,000 1 $10,000 606(1) Metal Beam Guardrail LF 1 200 555 200 $11,000 626(1) Sanitary Sewer Utilities LS 1 1 $25,000 1 525,000 627(1) Potable Water Utilities LS 1 1 $25,000 1 525,000 640(1) Mobilization / Demobilization LS 1 1 5100,000 1 $100,000 642(1) Construction Surveying LS 1 1 525,000 1 525,000 644(1) Workers Meals & Lodging or Per Diem LS 1 1 515,000 1 515,000 662(1) Electrical Lighting & Power LS 1 1 $25,000 1 525,000 670(1) Terminal Bldg and Waiting Shelter SF 1 1,400 5225 1,400 $315,000 Item Totals = 5551,000 Construction & Estimating Contingencies @ 5%= 527,550 Construction Administration @ 151 = $82,650 Construction Total = 5661,200 ICAP @ 4.79% = $31,671 Project Totals = 5692,871 SE Region - Marine Engineering Project Construction Cost Estimate - 11412011 PROJECT NUMBER: 68938 PROJECT TITLE: Kodiak Ferry Terminal WORK DESCRIPTION: PIER 2 - ALTERNATE 38 Item Total No Item Unit No Rqd Unit Qty Unit Price Quantity Amount 401(1) Staging Area Surface Improvements and Lane Spacing LS 1 1 $10,000 1 510,000 501(1) Concrete Bridge Abutment LS 1 1 525,000 1 525,000 504(1) Steel or Concrete Retaining Wall Structure SF 1 6,000 $200 6,000 $1,200,000 504(2) 130' Steel Transfer Bridge LS 1 1 $900,000 1 $900,000 504(3) Bridge Lift or Float Support System LS 1 1 51,000,000 1 51 000,000 606(1) Metal Beam Guardrail LF 1 200 $55 200 $11,000 626(1) Sanitary Sewer Utilities LS 1 1 $25,000 1 525,000 627(1) Potable Water Utilities LS 1 1 525,000 1 $25,000 640(1) Mobilization / Demobilization LS 1 1 5350,000 1 5350,000 642(1) Construction Surveying LS 1 1 550,000 1 $50,000 644(1) Workers Meals & Lodging or Per Diem LS 1 1 $50,000 1 $50,000 662(1) Electrical Lighting & Power LS 1 1 $200,000 1 $200,000 670(1) Painted Traffic Markings LS 1 1 $35,000 1 535,000 670(2) Terminal Bldg and Waiting Shelter SF 1 1,400 $225 1,400 $315,000 Item Totals = $4,196,000 Construction 8 Estimating Contingencies @ 5% = 5209,800 Construction Administration @ 15% = $629400 Construction Total= $5,035,200 ICAP @4.79 % = $241,186 Project Totals= $5,276,386 SE Region - Marine Engineering Project Construction Cost Estimate - 1/4/2011 PROJECT NUMBER: 68938 PROJECT TITLE: Kodiak Ferry Terminal WORK DESCRIPTION: PIER 2 - ALTERNATE 3C Item Total No Item Unit No Rqd Unit Qty Unit Price Quantity Amount 202(1) Demolition & Removal LS 1 1 $10,000 1 510,000 401(1) Staging Area Surface Improvements and Lane Spacing LS 1 1 510,000 1 $10,000 501(1) Concrete Bridge Abutment LS 1 1 $25,000 1 525,000 504(1) Steel or Concrete Retaining Wall Structure SF 1 10,000 $200 10,000 $2,000,000 504(2) 130' Steel Transfer Bridge LS 1 1 5900,000 1 5900,000 504(3) Bridge Lift or Float Support System LS 1 1 $1,000,000 1 51,000,000 603(1) Storm Drain System LS 1 1 540,000 1 $40,000 606(1) Metal Beam Guardrail LF 1 600 $55 600 $33,000 626(1) Sanitary Sewer Utilities LS 1 1 5200,000 1 $200,000 627(1) Potable Water Utilities LS 1 1 $200,000 1 5200,000 640(1) Mobilization / Demobilization LS 1 1 $350,000 1 5350,000 642(1) Construction Surveying LS 1 1 $100,000 1 5100,000 644(1) Workers Meals & Lodging or Per Diem LS 1 1 $25,000 1 $25,000 662(1) Electrical Lighting & Power LS 1 1 $400,000 1 $400,000 670(2) Terminal Bldg & Waiting Shelter SF 1 1,400 $225 1,400 $315,000 Item Totals = 55,608,000 Construction & Estimating Contingencies © 5% = $280,400 Construction Administration @ 15% = $841.200 Construction Total = $6,729,600 ICAP @ 4.79% = 5322,348 Project Totals = 57,051,948 SE Region - Marine Engineering Single Project, All Work PROJECT NUMBER: 68938 PROJECT TITLE: Kodiak Ferry Terminal WORK DESCRIPTION: ST. PAUL BREAKWATER - ALTERNATE 4A Item Total No Item Unit No Rqd Unit Qty Unit Price Quantity Amount 202(1) Demolition & Removal LS 1 1 $250,000 1 $250,000 203(1) Unclassified Borrow CY 1 202,000 $25 202,000 $5,050,000 203(2) Riprap CY 1 24,000 380 24,000 $1,920,000 203(3) Unclassified Excavation CY 1 250 $15 250 $3,750 301(1) Aggregate Base Course (12" thick) CY 1 4,000 $25 4,000 $100,000 401(1) Asphalt Concrete (4" thick- 145 pef) Tons 1 2,500 $100 2,500 $250,000 501(1) Concrete Bridge Abutment LS 1 1 325,000 1 $25,000 504(1) Pile Supported Dock Structure SF 1 10,500 $250 10,500 $2,625,000 504(2) Cathodic Protection System (Anodes) LS 1 1 375,000 1 375,000 504(3) Fender Lead -In Mooring Structure EA 1 3 3400,000 3 $1,200,000 504(4) Fender Mooring Structure EA 1 4 3300,000 4 31,200,000 504(5) Steel Access Catwalk EA 1 4 $80,000 4 $320,000 504(6) 130' Steel Transfer Bridge LS 1 1 $900,000 1 $900,000 504(7) Bridge Lift or Float Support System LS 1 1 31,000,000 1 31,000,000 603(1) Storm Drain System LS 1 1 $40,000 1 $40,000 606(1) Metal Beam Guardrail LF 1 3,000 $55 3,000 $165,000 607(1) Pedestrian Barrier Rail LF 1 1,000 $115 1,000 $115,000 608(1) Concrete Sidewalk SY 1 150 $50 150 $7,500 609(1) Concrete Curb LF 1 3,500 $45 3,500 3157,500 626(1) Sanitary Sewer Utilities LS 1 1 3250,000 1 $250,000 627(1) Potable Water Utilities LS 1 1 3250,000 1 $250,000 640(1) Mobilization / Demobilization LS 1 1 $800,000 1 3800,000 642(1) Construction Surveying LS 1 1 3125,000 1 3125,000 644(1) Workers Meals & Lodging or Per Diem LS 1 1 $100,000 1 $100,000 662(1) Electrical Lighting & Power LS 1 1 3350,000 1 $350,000 670(1) Painted Traffic Markings LS 1 1 $25,000 1 325,000 670(2) Terminal Bldg SF 1 3,000 $225 3,000 3675,000 670(3) Warehouse SF 1 720 $150 720 3108,000 Item Totals = 318,086,750 Construction & Estimating Contingencies © 5 %= $904,338 Construction Administration © 15% _ $2,713,013 Construction Total = $21,704,100 ICAP © 4.79%= $1,039,626 Project Totals = 322,743,726 SE Region - Marine Engineering Project Construction Cost Estimate - 2/28/2011 PROJECT NUMBER: 68938 PROJECT TITLE: Kodiak Ferry Terminal WORK DESCRIPTION: ST. PAUL BREAKWATER - ALTERNATE 4B Item Total No Item Unit No Rqd Unit Qty Unit Price Quantity Amount 202(1) Demolition & Removal LS 1 1 $250,000 1 $250,000 203(1) Unclassified Borrow CV 1 133,000 525 133,000 53,325,000 203(2) Riprap CY 1 17,000 $80 17,000 $1,360,000 203(3) Unclassified Excavation CY 1 250 $15 250 $3,750 301(1) Aggregate Base Course (12" thick) CY 1 3,500 525 3,500 $87,500 401(1) Asphalt Concrete (4 " thick - 145 pc0) Tons 1 2,250 $100 2,250 $225,000 501(1) Concrete Bridge Abutment LS 1 1 $25,000 1 $25,000 504(1) Pile Supported Dock Structure SF 1 32,840 $250 32,840 58,210,000 504(2) Cathodic Protection System (Anodes) LS 1 1 $75,000 1 $75,000 504(3) Fender Lead -In Mooring Structure EA 1 3 $400,000 3 $1,200,000 504(4) Fender Mooring Strudure EA 1 4 5300,000 4 $1,200,000 504(5) Steel Access Catwalk EA 1 4 580,000 4 5320,000 504(6) 130' Steel Transfer Bridge LS 1 1 5900,000 1 $900,000 504(7) Bridge Lift or Float Support System LS 1 1 51,000,000 1 51,000,000 603(1) Stonn Drain System LS 1 1 $40,000 1 540,000 606(1) Metal Beam Guardrail LF 1 3,000 $55 3,000 5165,000 607(1) Pedestrian Barrier Rail LF 1 1000 5115 1,000 $115,000 608(1) Concrete Sidewalk SY 1 150 $50 150 $7,500 609(1) Concrete Curb LF 1 3,000 $45 3,000 $135,000 626(1) Sanitary Sewer Utilities LS 1 1 5250,000 1 5250,000 627(1) Potable Water Utilities LS 1 1 5250,000 1 5250,000 640(1) Mobilization / Demobilization LS 1 1 51,000000 1 $1,000,000 642(1) Construction Surveying LS 1 1 5125,000 1 $125,000 644(1) Workers Meals & Lodging or Per Diem LS 1 1 $100,000 1 5100000 662(1) Electrical Lighting & Power LS 1 1 $350,000 1 5350,000 670(1) Painted Traffic Markings LS 1 1 $25000 1 $25,000 670(2) Terminal Bldg SF 1 3,000 $225 3,000 $675,000 670(3) Warehouse SF 1 720 $150 720 5108,000 Item Totals = $21,526,750 Construction & Estimating Contingencies © 5% = 51,076,338 Construction Administration @ 15% = $3,229,013 Construction Total = $25,832,100 ICAP @ 4.79% _ 51,237,358 Project Totals = 527,069,458 • SE Region - Marine Engineering Project Construction Cost Estimate - 1/4/2011 PROJECT NUMBER: 68938 PROJECT TITLE: Kodiak Ferry Terminal WORK DESCRIPTION: LASH DOCK - ALTERNATIVE 5A Item Total No item Unit No Rqd Unit Qty Unit Price Quantity Amount 202(1) Demolition & Removal LS 1 1 525,000 1 525,000 301(1) Aggregate Base Course (12" thick) CY 1 5,500 $25 5,500 $137,500 401(1) Asphalt Concrete (4 " thick - 145 pct)) Tons 1 3,500 $100 3,500 5350,000 504(1) Cathodic Protection System (Anodes) LS 1 1 $75,000 1 575,000 504(2) Fender Mooring Structure EA 1 6 $300000 6 $1,800,000 603(1) Storm Drain System LS 1 1 $40,000 1 $40,000 606(1) Metal Beam Guardrail LF 1 1,500 $55 1,500 582,500 607(1) Pedestrian Border Rail LF 1 600 $115 600 569,000 608(1) Concrete Sidewalk SY 1 1,000 $50 1000 550,000 609(1) Concrete Curb LF 1 2,000 $45 2,000 590,000 626(1) Sanitary Sewer Utilities LS 1 1 $200,000 1 5200,000 627(1) Potable Water Utilities LS 1 1 $200,000 1 $200,000 640(1) Mobilization / Demobilization LS 1 1 $350,000 1 5350,000 642(1) Construction Surveying L5 1 1 $25,000 1 $25,000 644(1) Workers Meals & Lodging or Per Diem LS 1 1 $25,000 1 525,000 662(1) Electrical Lighting & Power LS 1 1 5300,000 1 $300,000 670(1) Painted Traffic Markings LS 1 1 $25,000 1 $25,000 670(2) Terminal Bldg SF 1 3,000 $225 3,000 $675,000 670(3) Warehouse SF 1 720 $150 720 5108,000 Item Totals = $4,627,000 Construction & Estimating Contingencies @ 5% = 5231,350 Construction Administration © 15 %= $694,050 Construction Total = $5,552,400 ROW Acquisition (Purchase Existing Dock) = 56,000,000 ICAP @479 % = $265,960 Project Totals= $11,818,360 SE Region - Marine Engineering Project Construction Cost Estimate - 1/4/2011 PROJECT NUMBER: 68938 PROJECT TITLE: Kodiak Ferry Terminal WORK DESCRIPTION: LASH DOCK - ALTERNATE 5B Item Total No Item Unit No Rqd Unit Qty Unit Price Quantity Amount 201(1) Clearing and Grubbing LS 1 1 510000 1 515,000 202(1) Demolition & Removal LS 1 1 $25,000 1 $25,000 203(1) Unclassified Borrow CY 1 1,500 $25 1,500 $37,500 203(2) Riprap CY 1 700 $80 700 556,000 301(1) Aggregate Base Course (12" thick) CY 1 6,000 $25 6,000 $150,000 401(1) Asphalt Concrete (4 " thick - 145pcf)) Tans 1 4,000 $100 4,000 5400,000 501(1) Concrete Bridge Abutment LS 1 1 $25,000 1 $25,000 504(1) Cathodic Protection System (Anodes) LS 1 1 $75,000 1 $75,000 504(2) Fender Lead -In Mooring Structure EA 1 2 $400,000 2 $800,000 504(3) Fender Mooring Structure EA 1 5 $300,000 5 $1,500,000 504(4) Steel Access Catwalk EA 1 1 580,000 1 580,000 504(5) 130' Steel Transfer Bridge LS 1 1 5900,000 1 $900,000 504(6) 130' Pedestrian Gangway LS 1 1 $200,000 1 5200,000 504(7) Bridge Lift or Float Support System LS 1 1 51 000,000 1 51,000,000 603(1) Storm Drain System LS 1 1 540,000 1 $40,000 606(1) Metal Beam Guardrail LF 1 1,500 $55 1,500 $82,500 608(1) Concrete Sidewalk SY 1 1,000 $50 1,000 $50,000 609(1) Concrete Curb LF 1 2000 $45 2,000 $90,000 626(1) Sanitary Sewer Utilities LS 1 1 $200,000 1 $200,000 627(1) Potable Water Utilities LS 1 1 $200,000 1 $200,000 640(1) Mobilization / Demobilization LS 1 1 5350,000 1 5350,000 642(1) Construction Surveying LS 1 1 $50,000 1 550,000 644(1) Workers Meals & Lodging or Per Diem LS 1 1 525,000 1 $25,000 662(1) Electrical Lighting & Power LS 1 1 5300,000 1 $300,000 670(1) Painted Traffic Markings LS 1 1 $25,000 1 $25,000 670(2) Terminal Bldg 5F 1 3,000 $225 3,000 $675,000 670(3) Warehouse SF 1 720 $150 720 $108,000 Item Totals = $7,459,000 Construction & Estimating Contingencies @ 5% = $372,950 Construction Administration @ 15 %= $1,118,850 Construction Total = $8,950,800 ROW Acquisition (Purchase Existing Dock) = $6,000,000 ICAP © 4 79% = 5428,743 Project Totals = 515,379,543 SE Region - Marine Engineering Project Construction Cost Estimate - 115/2011 PROJECT NUMBER: 68938 PROJECT TITLE: Kodiak Ferry Terminal WORK DESCRIPTION: CITY TRANSIENT FLOAT - ALTERNATE 6A Item Total No Item Unit No Rqd Unit Qty Unit Price Quantity Amount 202(1) Demolition 8 Removal LS 1 1 $250,000 1 $250,000 203(1) Unclassified Borrow CY 1 50,000 $25 50,000 $1,250,000 203(3) Unclassified Excavation LS 1 1 $50,000 1 $50,000 301(1) Aggregate Base Course (12" thick) CY 1 1,500 $25 1500 $37,500 401(1) Asphalt Concrete (4 " thick - 145 pcf) Tons 1 1,000 $100 1,000 $100500 504(1) Steel or Concrete Retaining Wall Structure SF 1 3,000 $200 5000 $600000 504(2) Cellular Sheet Pile Cofferdam Structure SF 1 61,000 $175 61,000 $10,675,000 504(3) Cathodic Protection System (Anodes) LS 1 1 $75,000 1 $75,000 504(4) Fender Lead -In Mooring Structure EA 1 2 $400,000 2 $800,000 504(5) Fender Mooring Structure EA 1 5 $300,000 5 $1,500,000 504(6) Steel Access Catwalk EA 1 2 $80,000 2 $160,000 603(1) Storm Drain System LS 1 1 $40,000 1 $40,000 606(1) Metal Beam Guardrail LF 1 550 $55 550 $30,250 607(1) Pedestrian Barrier Rail LF 1 300 $115 300 $34,500 608(1) Concrete Sidewalk SY 1 250 $50 250 $12,500 609(1) Concrete Curb LF 1 1,200 $45 1,200 $54,000 626(1) Sanitary Sewer Utilities LS 1 1 $150,000 1 $150,000 627(1) Potable Water Utilities LS 1 1 $150,000 1 $150,000 640(1) Mobilization 1 Demobilization LS 1 1 $550,000 1 $550,000 642(1) Construction Surveying LS 1 1 $75,000 1 $75,000 644(1) Workers Meals 8 Lodging or Per Diem L5 1 1 $75,000 1 $75,000 662(1) Electrical Lighting 8 Power LS 1 1 $450,000 1 $450,000 670(1) Painted Traffic Markings LS 1 1 310,000 1 $10,000 670(2) Terminal Bldg SF 1 1,050 $225 1,050 $236250 Item Totals = $17,365,000 Construction 8 Estimating Contingencies @ 5 %= $868250 Construction Administration @ 15 %= $2,604,750 Construction Total = 320,838,000 ICAP @ 4.79% = $998,140 Project Totals = $21,836,140 SE Region - Marine Engineering Project Construction Cost Estimate - 1/5/2011 PROJECT NUMBER: 68938 PROJECT TITLE: Kodiak Ferry Terminal WORK DESCRIPTION: CITY TRANSIENT FLOAT - ALTERNATIVE 6B Item Total No Item Unit No Rqd Unit Qty Unit Price Quantity Amount 202(1) Demolition & Removal LS 1 1 $250,000 1 $250,000 203(1) Unclassified Borrow CY 1 30000 $25 30,000 $750,000 203(3) Unclassified Excavation LS 1 1 $50,000 1 $50000 301(1) Aggregate Base Course (12" thick) CY 1 1&00 $25 1,300 $32,500 401(1) Asphalt Concrete (4" thick - 145 pcf)) Tons 1 850 $100 850 $85,000 504(1) Cellular Sheet Pile Cofferdam Structure SF 1 55,500 $175 55,500 $9712,500 504(2) Pile Supported Dock Structure SF 1 5,000 $250 5,000 51250,000 504(3) Cathodic Protection System (Anodes) LS 1 1 $75,000 1 575,000 504(4) Fender Lead -In Mooring Structure EA 1 2 5400,000 2 $800.000 504(5) Fender Mooring Structure EA 1 6 5300,000 6 51,800,000 504(6) Steel Access Catwalk EA 1 2 580,000 2 $160,000 603(1) Storm Drain System LS 1 1 $40,000 1 $40,000 606(1) Metal Beam Guardrail LE 1 550 $55 550 $30,250 607(1) Pedestrian Barrier Rail LF 1 600 $115 600 $69,000 608(1) Concrete Sidewalk SY 1 250 $50 250 $12,500 609(1) Concrete Curb LF 1 1,200 $45 1,200 $54,000 626(1) Sanitary Sewer Utilities LS 1 1 $150000 1 5150,000 627(1) Potable Water Utilities LS 1 1 $150,000 1 5150,000 640(1) Mobilization / Demobilization LS 1 1 $550,000 1 $550,000 642(1) Construction Surveying LS 1 1 $75,000 1 575,000 644(1) Workers Meals & Lodging or Per Diem LS 1 1 $75,000 1 $75,000 662(1) Electrical Lighting & Power LS 1 1 $450,000 1 $450,000 670(1) Painted Traffic Markings LS 1 1 510,000 1 $10,000 670(2) Terminal Bldg SF 1 1,050 $225 1,050 5236250 Item Totals = 516,867,000 Construction & Estimating Contingencies @ 5% = $843,350 Construction Administration @ 15% = $2,530,050 Construction Total = $20,240,400 ICAP @ 4.79 % = 5969,515 Project Totals = $21,209,915 SE Region - Marine Engineering Project Construction Cost Estimate - 1)5/2011 PROJECT NUMBER: 68938 PROJECT TITLE: Kodiak Ferry Terminal WORK DESCRIPTION: CITY TRANSIENT FLOAT - ALTERNATIVE 6C Item Total No Item Unit No Rqd Unit Qty Unit Price Quantity Amount 202(1) Demolition &Removal LS 1 1 $250,000 1 $250,000 203(1) Unclassified Borrow CY 1 3,500 $25 3,500 587,500 203(2) Riprap CY 1 4,000 $80 4,000 $320,000 203(3) Unclassified Excavation LS 1 1 525,000 1 $25,000 301(1) Aggregate Base Course (12 " thick) CY 1 400 $25 400 $10,000 401(1) Asphalt Concrete (4" thick - 145 pcf)) Tons 1 250 $100 250 525,000 501(1) Concrete Bridge Abutment LF 1 250 $400 250 $100,000 504(1) Pile Supported Dock Structure SF 1 30,000 $250 30,000 57,500,000 504(2) Cathodic Protection System (Anodes) LS 1 1 $75,000 1 $75,000 504(3) Fender Lead -In Mooring Structure EA 1 2 $400,000 2 $800,000 504(4) Fender Mooring Structure EA 1 5 $300,000 5 51,500,000 504(5) Steel Access Catwalk EA 1 2 580,000 2 $160,000 603(1) Storm Drain System LS 1 1 $40,000 1 $40,000 606(1) Metal Beam Guardrail LF 1 750 $55 750 $41,250 607(1) Pedestrian Barrier Rail LF 1 300 $115 300 $34,500 608(1) Concrete Sidewalk SY 1 250 550 250 $12,500 609(1) Concrete Curb LF 1 1,000 $45 1,000 $45,000 626(1) Sanitary Sewer Utilities LS 1 1 $150,000 1 $150,000 627(1) Potable Water Utilities LS 1 1 $150,000 1 5150,000 640(1) Mobilization/ Demobilization LS 1 1 $550,000 1 5550,000 642(1) Construction Surveying LS 1 1 575,000 1 $75000 644(1) Workers Meals & Lodging or Per Diem LS 1 1 575,000 1 $75,000 662(1) Electrical Lighting & Power LS 1 1 $450,000 1 $450,000 670(1) Painted Traffic Markings LS 1 1 510,000 1 510,000 670(2) Terminal Bldg SF 1 1,050 $225 1,050 $236,250 Item Totals = $12,722,000 Construction & Estimating Contingencies @ 5% = $636,100 Construction Administration @ 15 %= $1,908,300 Construction Total = $15,266,400 ICAP @ 4.79% = $731261 Project Totals = 515,997,661 •. SE Region - Marine Engineering Project Construction Cost Estimate - 1/5/2011 PROJECT NUMBER: 68938 PROJECT TITLE: Kodiak Ferry Terminal WORK DESCRIPTION: CITY TRANSIENT FLOAT - ALTERNATIVE 60 Item Total No Item Unit No Rqd Unit Qty Unit Price Quantity Amount 202(1) Demolition & Removal LS 1 1 $250,000 1 $250,000 203(1) Unclassified Borrow CY 1 200 $25 200 $5,000 203(2) Riprap CY 1 1,000 $80 1,000 $80,000 203(3) Unclassified Excavation LS 1 1 425.000 1 $25,000 301(1) Aggregate Base Course (1T thick) CY 1 200 $25 200 $5,000 401(1) Asphalt Concrete (4 thick - 145 pct]) Tons 1 100 $100 100 $10,000 501(1) Concrete Bridge Abutment LF 1 260 $400 260 4104,000 504(X) Pile Supported Dock Structure SF 1 34,000 $250 34,000 $8,500,000 504(X) Cathodic Protection System (Anodes) LS 1 1 $75,000 1 $75,000 504(X) Fender Lead -In Mooring Structure EA 1 2 $400,000 2 4800,000 504(X) Fender Mooring Structure EA 1 5 $300,000 5 $1,500,000 504(X) Steel Access Catwalk EA 1 2 $80,000 2 $160,000 603(1) Storm Drain System LS 1 1 $40,000 1 $40,000 606(1) Metal Beam Guardrail LF 1 550 $55 550 $30,250 607(1) Pedestrian Barrier Rail LF 1 300 $115 300 $34,500 608(1) Concrete Sidewalk SY 1 250 $50 250 $12,500 609(1) Concrete Curb LF 1 1,000 $45 1,000 $45,000 626(1) Sanitary Sewer Utilities LS 1 1 $150,000 1 $150,000 627(1) Potable Water Utilities LS 1 1 $150,000 1 $150,000 640(1) Mobilization / Demobilization LS 1 1 $550,000 1 $550,000 642(1) Construction Surveying LS 1 1 $75,000 1 $75,000 644(1) Workers Meals & Lodging or Per Diem LS 1 1 $75,000 1 $75,000 662(1) Electrical Lighting & Power LS 1 1 $450,000 1 $450,000 670(1) Painted Traffic Markings LS 1 1 $10000 1 $10,000 670(2) Terminal Bldg SF 1 1,050 $225 1,050 $236,250 Item Totals = $13,372,500 Construction & Estimating Contingencies @ 5% = $668,625 Construction Administration @ 15 %= $2,005,875 Construction Total = $16,047,000 ICAP @4.79 % = 4768,651 Project Totals = $16,815,651 SE Region - Marine Engineering Project Construction Cost Estimate - 1/5/2011 PROJECT NUMBER: 68938 PROJECT TITLE: Kodiak Ferry Terminal WORK DESCRIPTION: PIER 1 - ALTERNATIVE 7A Item Total No Item Unit No Rqd Unit Qty Unit Price Quantity Amount 202(1) Demolition & Removal LS 1 1 $1,000,000 1 $1,000,000 203(1) Unclassified Borrow CY 1 500 $25 500 $12,500 203(3) Unclassified Excavation LS 1 1 525,000 1 $25,000 301(1) Aggregate Base Course (1T thick) CY 1 600 $25 600 $15,000 401(1) Asphalt Concrete (4" thick - 145 pep) Tons 1 400 $100 400 $40,000 501(1) Concrete Bridge Abutment LF 1 180 $400 180 $72,000 504(1) Pile Supported Dock Structure SF 1 23,000 $250 23,000 $5,750,000 504(2) Cathodic Protection System (Anodes) LS 1 1 575,000 1 $75,000 504(3) Fender Lead -In Mooring Structure EA 1 2 $400,000 2 $800,000 504(4) Fender Mooring Structure EA 1 4 $300,000 4 $1,200000 504(5) Steel Access Catwalk EA 1 1 $80,000 1 $80,000 603(1) Storm Drain System LS 1 1 $40,000 1 $40,000 606(1) Metal Beam Guardrail LF 1 800 $55 800 $44,000 607(1) Pedestrian Barrier Rail LF 1 250 $115 250 $28,750 608(1) Concrete Sidewalk SY 1 100 $50 100 $5,000 609(1) Concrete Curb LF 1 650 $45 650 $29,250 626(1) Sanitary Sewer Utilities LS 1 1 $150,000 1 $150,000 627(1) Potable Water Utilities LS 1 1 $150,000 1 $150,000 628(1) Relocate POL Fuel Lines LS 1 1 5150,000 1 $150000 640(1) Mobilization / Demobilization LS 1 1 $550,000 1 $550,000 642(1) Construction Surveying LS 1 1 $75,000 1 $75,000 644(1) Workers Meals & Lodging or Per Diem LS 1 1 575,000 1 $75,000 662(1) Electrical Lighting & Power LS 1 1 $450,000 1 $450,000 670(1) Painted Traffic Markings LS 1 1 $10,000 1 $10,000 670(2) Terminal Bldg SF 1 1,050 $225 1,050 $236,250 Item Totals = $10,826,500 Construction & Estimating Contingencies @ 5% = $541,325 Construction Administration @ 15% = 51,623,975 Construction Total = $12,991,800 ICAP © 479% = $622,307 Project Totals= $13,614,107 • SE Region - Marine Engineering Project Construction Cost Estimate - 3/16/2011 PROJECT NUMBER: 68938 PROJECT TITLE: Kodiak Ferry Terminal WORK DESCRIPTION: PIER 1 - ALTERNATIVE 7B Item Total No Item Unit No Rqd Unit Qty Unit Price Quantity Amount 202(1) Demolition 8 Removal LS 1 1 5500,000 1 $500000 203(1) Unclassified Borrow CY 1 500 $25 500 512,500 203(3) Unclassified Excavation LS 1 1 525,000 1 528000 301(1) Aggregate Base Course (12" thick) CY 1 600 525 600 515000 401(1) Asphalt Concrete (4 " thick - 145 pcf)) Tons 1 400 5100 400 540,000 501(1) Concrete Bridge Abutment LF 1 120 $400 120 548,000 504(1) Pile Supported Dock Structure SF 1 11,500 $275 11,500 $3,162,500 504(2) Cathodic Protection System (Anodes) LS 1 1 575,000 1 575,000 504(6) Repair Existing Dock L5 1 1 5100,000 1 5100,000 603(1) Storm Drain System LS 1 1 $40,000 1 $40,000 606(1) Metal Beam Guardrail LF 1 800 $55 800 $44,000 607(1) Pedestrian Bonier Rail LF 1 250 5115 250 $28.750 608(1) Concrete Sidewalk SY 1 100 $50 100 55,000 609(1) Concrete Curb LF 1 650 $45 650 $29,250 626(1) Sanitary Sewer Utilities LS 1 1 $150,000 1 $150000 627(1) Potable Water Utilities L5 1 1 5150,000 1 5150,000 628(1) Relocate POL Fuel Lines LS 1 1 5150,000 1 $150,000 640(1) Mobilization / Demobilization LS 1 1 5550,000 1 $550,000 642(1) Construction Surveying LS 1 1 575,000 1 575,000 644(1) Workers Meals 8 Lodging or Per Diem LS 1 1 $75,000 1 575,000 662(1) Electricat Lighting 8 Power LS 1 1 5450000 1 $450,000 670(1) Painted Traffic Markings LS 1 1 $10,000 1 510,000 670(2) Terminal Bldg SF 1 1,050 $400 1.050 5420,000 Item Totals = $6,155,000 Construction 8 Estimating Contingencies @ 5% = $307,750 Construction Administration @ 15 %= 5923,250 Construction Total = 57,386,000 ICAP @ 4.79 % = $353,789 Project Totals= $7,739,789 APPENDIX D ALTERNATIVE DRAWINGS #w ' (A SH 0 k ♦ t R-\ _ ��5 MI �,.,, ' 1 � Seel I . , '! 6 'x1i t fP �( LI K t{ ! � � ��� � � � Y �+n P zrsr a Iv., . 4 A++. 3 .i n , ;;;, - E., 4 :4 ;; ; . ' , a � y, P e !3 e 4' w �7. �`lY r 33, B .41.- r „� Q� rf',€:.0 T,,0� � u , x k fit. r.1 °. '-.. � tea •+' q ..� -0 �' 1 _.{ 1 c^ .t h� t yn -N '+{` � $ "" B y s t� ^�'t � � �r�ti � /� '�i`.�'� t+. v � �w �rA. o r x "+' aa� r B 1 y a ..r Z '1! p I } YxyS , r ,i i7 1417 �•li M n';'.'>-- tt i A , : f Trigg $3 � 4 � ' w, ;y JS'r ;Al • f `$ is .. I T'114 a _ . r/ ' � s F ' ,+• [,�.�. !u Li t y b} 4*-0 h •'g a S p' ' I" s \ '� 1t R ai ° ° r . .w F A®n '. r s.. 4 0 '' . s. 94-- " 'r ^ ` t t s x "c"'e sl rapt; - N rb fi t' - : , , .7 ti” `f r rf'Y �x t ', , z . : -'' " 9r '� ! qau s i a B k I sl z4 ,r x • 7 : t ' .Z < x ; n \ +.0 Fafrrt'>•o-'s x . R 1 a 4 ' 3 G s f+ } --'{4-3 ' . • A M , , = Y * , F "' a r 9 � p a J qt `' '1/41'14.‘ t ; _ ".i A S � • ' e r � m � t � • M • '�¢,," b n n � � b p�� r ' C' C ; h. t jjv � t " Sn t L (r t \ ! , .#?u,9 � ,. Ir r a y I "�f r ▪ �t N, '' 3-- L : L � �v„ r.j a h e ll . -4.9 f a t v 24.%,./ ry 'd . , . 4,, `i y d t , 4,1 J' �11srw Y i ▪ l° :St. d e ty- f ,4 ' y Sir 't y r'ai,.ik }' `� �^y, F y> N 5 �'� r� > 'M.` 4 r 5�. �. Zi y rx' "� �T." �. { / .} y ,� as ' 3� ' Id ,r�i f " -r" sf f } Y ,„--1._. "' x,'CD:- •� .- . ,:" ^c `.,, -. a=. } ! . b' 4 4. -• v3'� y. n rl2nai '$. 1�. a i • q"' t . , • ;y, l. .. -,...,..t �WWg t, y4i .. - ,..v '. �'�� w s r y t- , - ,. � � l � � • ° "' •„y3 ' , e k t r (., •c ,. -nazi r "C ^ tt: 4 '•' 'C'° ` ? e`O�SL P �'� v v4ak R, � 'P} x l',2,,,,. } � . ^ el N p � ./ k w. tr' 'j r.• P! II SI i T n of Ila I y J vy. , i c w e- a - `„ - y „ T '"'l. .,< 'c .�4 -"T / .4 ." -:- '-e u ' 1� k v <• - e J T I::: � u { P " r. a ' 4�:d / T6 Z 'Sa °C � '° ,3!� F 5 „ I ' M'< a / 1 S. r • o fr .x - , +.r :' A,, f ti ''''C'E' ` g y ' \ 5�' U. G � e '° .. f °, 1 . ll s.. -!s. r ! � ��lY d 'r.", "`^ a.. ^ i q � s.Y ( S. r .�a �. .. T �' > ., ¢ - a! L 4 • 4 :5 �.,v z .`,. l a " 1 t • w ` NS ,, y, �� i •' . � r� +, . `f � t3� t %F f y;S '�- • °' � Ji s j � t om` l ". • . ^� .s r ° �� ` ' Si L sn � 000k �i`f' 1- �"i � 2 � � . �`�� � ^ � x r > f 9v aFSO +a I • rS e• to 1-Q62--vs. y [,�r +£ .�9a, �„-- ° 74. �t &y''^; t `TY „ +. : ,.:-. 3: "k T v Yy; rC ., a .ar r L /� rt�'b • 6 q . _ v yF ,,, T f �Ni/ b Y b! ( .., \ _ /' K ' F IGURE 1- P al ROPOSED SITES LOCATION MAP Kod Ferry Termin AlA5KA 0EPARiKENT a TRANSPORTATION t uNAL C FALILIT ES am yr , „„f ee✓N \ eM•sn w� \xxm o-10 \xlw 'CC!' FIGS PPOPOSEO ODIAKKALASNA A K/{ .i 3 AitkrrP' a • tR P • V 't K6' •�-r,. • '±211":4';', � i •' I1,o,tl 4/ 4 P I at d C o f L Cost $I I million �t > •% % xv � • CPO / L i ,t, tiY CROS �� O e r FJ � S r • . e ss 1 s h ry r. ./ C Existing a113 I Ilp d ta • f ` i . sewer utilities nearby k M1 � e �. �� }} / -- r "' Ucongcl Jt R 11 3 'G /G' i^ � r ' operatic d l nAMllS ivrty „ /�� d �/ "p, '}^��f� r. t g PI d cP n dcveloPv'J ".-= . 'i ,. " 5r ^7y'i ,� � ( y: S P - nc .' i gb g dng 1 \ /�j� 1 y� IY , ' 4 L r CON A � � ` / 1 ' ( { i Y � 1 1 5 g ve T t mclassOnly �. � f ' shallow be kdfl Irp le ns�silat oo r •- re lo ,,,sting Vessel �y��, ,a � F CgUe t I rem Heal longer es g / yS H'C�� 'N � ��f �/ ) S hm remote longer access (.q nd v'simr t� G ../ l f J uf� "Ifi ' n ph cs existing boat storage • L _ ( C t t a l conflicts s t h I b using "✓ r \ ' Lse t` � IQ' � ' ' 11 Y I () i '71 .. e0..•.- s B g g �. �� � � 4Vp< ��� - um nz g7l _ P ✓ j , M I' " ® '� -*m' t � ', r x"'' �j „ II? ' z f i.��� ./ r �, L ,a�; y " } C 1 +/ . / � r s n /i �� \d i�l ine%I .`..�__`- • ': .;VM`" :\' r . Yb� ' , r ' i + r 1l '� � -��. ' ^- , y , may :. A .;' a r s )..b` q \ 1 _. " --� ti.. Y'tx. ` N v y : ' vA s • � _� E � �, � '��� � 4 y� I \� ��� '� 1�,t i I . r 4 % 1 . � '�� 1� ,,, r ., ` . 3 ; ., �' Tot P s 'rt 5 . ,, tY+ / i! 7 �S 1$ { b.0. �J! '' s, " i k t e c r / /or „ , -+^ .,- • t t + , $ • aJ � +S v, - " � 4 1 . t r 4 V " A. G cS .+s' i r � j 4 T- !'� R f' 6 n I (y t Y k'k v 4 1} I �' x A ,' p,,� '/ /�� . .� . ^9 T ( 1. , (r by , C d# x r a, f 't ;'—. . x "�'�i,S]'rE l I r S F ` ' : y -' 'a" ,. � s A M r ' „ w 4 A] a i. tl tz' �� i / r ff<,;:(91-La?, /r ,.. a 6 ' ? tl l +. r + .I "RR ;yy n t /.76' P • 1�' ( d �µ. A ✓ iL".q� ` � ` � r t > 4( /N OlO ®� '� �/ I ro r " t 4 i. iY ' t '' .. ,y a A J Yr 'V • 4 a 16A .. < d R . . r f 7 l It 9.i rt ‘1111:' $ A .949 i a* a a. �,. 's r a ` a ` r$ F i 3 ie �'� ' 3 5 � I °? '��i°q++�y� • c T ". ' � 3 ri 1 5 �r vr' � f k���` s - .,- 3 `+ "",. } k r r S .� t .$ y + 4^ . f' $ . .. ' y es . t � e. r ', �.: � 4 " if, ` � o k �`+. \r '. a_? � a t > '}' .+ . r �` a ti ' � fro-. ,, ti .. s ."Tr tar o 8 ;,, $1 * ✓ 3 * r hL :'K {� x / n L= A Q r .: iN a 4i' frt' r '' �i 3 • � . a i' lb AR f r v. f ; • , ! "i >7 T' . s ' N �+ i 4 « ^I.s i,' a ^ ''. , .l l x R v z r. d y`t'.A$•'P , � ' , {T 9,,'` >j t / k 4 1: ,{ C s y r!' ",. ; y r 3 ` , t.te,. 2 zS .r{' tk / .0-0 S a s ' i - » i ! ��11 r ,. 4. �,. '3't F P +. " rr x nt` L'�t ^ t T' } % � ' ! ar c'. �+ � ' '�,r sue r. w , ^ 4.0,1/2. d a;4,, ,- 1F. t �{ V V/ ,Ve r �� , 31 ;Y J - 1*i R 1 e '� I s LL�I { Si"; a y ;a ` .!'' r r ' i ,, � N ♦ � 1 . /L�./ $ N " ' a � ,v il i� � µ }t. �} y gqq h 44' .jam. . - t n J ' c'.T A� f d - .0 eR t / _ ,c ,cr, A .XY Y .iR `' .YU � r . '..+ , d�.£.Us "_L:...,. . i . 1 i p 'U:R� FIGURE 2A- NE ISLAND NEAR ISLAND- ALTERNATE 2A / BY CHANNEL Kory Termal ALASKA DEPARTMENTOFTMNSPORTATI0 flPUBLIC FACIL RI ES PR OPDSED tllak KOO Fer IAK FERRY TERMINA : P 0' \Ka, 1 ”0.”1 Rec." 6- L 0 1 f)M . L R ELpN FIGS 6 , 2 Nwc „cars, ALr AOry H001 K, ALASKA • - • Si e Fair seswl accessibility - Cf• 0// ,,„/ N I a , 4 9 / /1„,-- --_,___. _ , ' „ i '1 ,I Water and seoer UtIlltleS nearby $:,; 7 7 • /----/ ' , . „ - ... . . ...:,. ,,,..--- ,--.. -- _-- -7 - • ..,:. . .a,.. - Uncongested traffic floss , . _ , pi , ., ..,: ,, ,7 t /7 , Ari)An.11-' . % , . . r . 7 . '''''.. I I S 41 4 t ' ' r 4 Ample upland area to support AM1II IS Fenn' - , ' ..,„ - rolh> - / 41\Ari.?"... 7 ea "1 ° .. , . / / . : ' . . ' 7" . ' .• . .-- ',;\ _f_j "Cl_., ----• --- % It: . p ;1/4 : I:34 % A . , C /:•••• E coN l s ixoting uplands are partially deseloped .3 - -•r s ...,. - Single vessel use - lustumena class only ..-' 4 . i :.". //, , '''• , ?,/ ,, 4 . .." .:„ O. ' ..„, _ V, , "`, Shalloss bedrock. difficult pile installation 1.. . - • ,. -, / t • - c.:. L , .\.„,/ . . , i ,- • • - --, Frequent small boat traffic in Ole area I 4 ./"' C V . "V ' l '' , -..."....tr ...a• a I ' ." - .1 Somenhat remote, longer access to Cos and so saw ' 4 */ .1$1.1 ' - 4•14,..'we'-i"c"...* -. '..." amenities p• "c ..p,:s : %, . • ] ...::5-, ,...: / 7 /Thy ./-7.: ". . . w - :- - s Apt , .• Displaces existing boat storage arca 4 i‘..." j '' sa ' • / :c. / - . ii" C Displaces existing barge landing arca • 1--4 . . - el . • . , • ` - rb--.... - . . . ' ,..,.._.___,.. ' ,..rm ' + wetlif:4'.. 7 a , .-■ ".' _____--- . "......., , ''.:A..._. 7 .- -tdils; ,. .'0:. 4 ,---:,-,--, :- : .- . ,. ..i --..- .2.: / - ..--::: < ci zt , ,76 .4 . „ i : ,.. 4%,-...- eq. ai.41.0.7- -.„.- . 1 '4.- ',4- AV 4,-- -- -,' ., 7 - ..:..- -- ...,v.%: .. -fit; ...- ,- - ., i , ' ';;;!fr. . ", ,- ' •II [tn."' A , ''' ' a 4 i 4 ructut> 17 ' ' ,1 : 'i h:' , 4 :-';' , i l - F ' Cr - : - '4r . : .1; . ;:r*setw41-,fr.:: ri. --.. At / , :hoo4. ' ., . - 74.0 4 : -Iit&..' , 74- 0 H.7,-- gi;s: ' - , -- / • ,• tr,. 7 / — . ,. ,, ... lAe r . r 2 7, . . .?`r . ■ .”, 1 ''-' , 4 74i 4 P ft // 0 l..* Yr.i: 1\`;"-"iCi- ffe., 40, .1t- ,- ‘4 . ..: -,• t=t.., ;.• ..: .. , :4- 4 4.; ‘'''' 4.11, , -Ar t% -4 -.-41.47 . - ' •- , ;4-1.1:- - .7 ,. -,- _,, atl. Tr .- 2 ' '''' ' .. : .. ..: \'- tIst•; „,.. 5,: , rt.; `, ?",c): .`....-. 4 , ay sr ti:ct" I nau I . • , ' 1 - - ... -^ ,' '"? e.'" ,. 1"' . lo -. ?AK:. ' %..: Ia iis.. ......nfi . .: . ..i4iAL:t" - .'''':. : 4';:-4 : 4' ,::: - :;11::, 2 1;‘,..r:.'t '■'-' 'I 1 4f- :- Ak ...'-' : 7 `. " " --• . .:--.' ' 41 ' 7 . . :At t ' ' 441 - 1 1.4 '" A i , .....0, ;,...„ - - - %. - II. e ... . ...., , .... . .. . T . ro 4 0 11 E .1 ". -!^-:‘ PI C •i f . ga ..7,...,:s. r,K,, ,cf, ,„ Oltiv•m• • .., -•• v e s t" - ,I ,.. -1. ' • ' • ' ' ' '/C3 1 8 ..4 f ' li: V . a ' 14 ' yy. ."4.P.Ii l is/ Th. ..- .."14 4OiCOT -11 Eit nit / oncssInh' oh* ii:-'f or i 4 • ' it h i / ..., oat T• 44'... 4 • i' `= j ; “ y' V ciri ::.-' .:•••', ' 4:•:? .., '•'•!:- • • '. . . •;.• ':. :FT'''. , ,r... .. 47 .'icitryn-q:'?=.77t7e7.: - ---.. ' • O ' '•• • /, -.; / - #-•_..--sr .- ,ir,, n , ;.,.: 2 ' : . ji: ' , „ . / ",..lt , ) ,,,,. • , c-742,,W01:,"tie ., ■^+,,i.A. '1' ', '. . .er Ar' t r. r e "4:1. 1" r' ' ' • :A:fp ,.., - 1 ^:'' --. „ tfr -,' ' ,,_ , - # -,7.. , ,i ..- . / r,-& zit ,H4 '.. ,', Y ''''' ,¢ c .4: - c# e 4-• -, -17/ , 4......i ..., ''-. - • 1 - - -4 - g . , 4- t-ii. 7 74 ..,. t,,,.. 4.-k : j . 7 7, '6 "ha/n„c 11 : 2 O - - - thoy:i 4 I , J'''! , ° • C '.. 'tit sSti PI/ Won ' -"': 4 ,11 7 4 1/4 o-corlif': f's OF' sha4.+Olot'SV' - "/:•' ''' - e_!: • -"Ae. .. - ,47.4.— 1 . sly— , .,,,,,,„ ,....;:,: 4 ,... , : z i Q C , r iA CA - .. 1P112 0. a irt ' o r-< a t' aD a:1" , a' a ..* *4 .. .621- .E2:+;" : ..- 'st it; . 1CD.1 . . ' - . a*F a II i-gh.'"ossf• ' ca ' -- a 1 1 3 CA se ' '" - -;;;V o cni = Oh" ' i; .-.` ol,".."./..'t l o 144 is . •EW' e / -,---) %- ors - o 'C • / , '"E -4- -1 '..44'.' fr. --, " --ga -- - •-"-• ' . 4 , 1:; ,- 1 , , ,, : , , , , , F , ...atetg ',- -,-- ..., , ti - ....;, , ,, ,-- ' :Wit A e tO4 ' , .,:,- 4.e. s 4 a - . 1 2 - - ^:r. Oen( 1.4 . ;441 s'' 4 ,,,C. • . , :: - n t, , ajs . • . ' l'f ff • OCVI.InfhlA:t4i ql,E17.4itf 4 .. ' sit, z , 44S '`.- - 14- , w , Vir-otg t el,, ,, lir..,r--, -, - 1- 7 ,, .:.t. , -:+iW 4 e le • yto •- - .• c •=4• •45 - CEastft Aie",; Altsf,': •ttir 0 . .• - . ittticAli1/41•Pecw= . -91-.3.0r ,,„4. 'Cr; ivItify,,,y ' Silisk:f.■.i6L;;:,,:24:* :::v::...,W.";;;Z:hil:Fk si . .....•e 'Ai I FIGURE 2B- NEAR ISLAND NEAR ISLAND - ALTERNATE 2B / AWAY FROM CHANNEL Kodiak Ferry Terminal ALASKA DEPAR FACILITIES KODIAK. ALASKA 4 report 1Recon 6-1GIRNAL RECON HGS 6-101.99 2 Near Island Aht a dug • rkv�;.µ Yg \ x O tt f t r h � r r„ S r i " 4 d ` x }' ,••,j. i ' ; e .,,.N F i mated Con I t t t SI million i ce, �t�+� 4 .?t �° � 4 '"" r a t. ^ ;✓..� � `V .�' " � gy ?• - * }k rv;�°` �k � .. 1 r• � s " �' PRpc » r.'w £ f iv. r f '",:,;41,t2.4... r� ( •M p, ,1 ! ` 5 ` ' fit >.L� r i';,, . } ' - . T ' '' 1 54 . . . - C oleni II b e by bo Ine Kenli la„ and .y�7{� � ^'t� N .a x>•, reh v:tir9�. V k ,Mk.,: w• Aa+ n f � 5§' x P 3 • '� - ' .t ' t t e IK I. n �i 5 l e �-�..+u ''' J J!! L d` $ t 'a r ,, • tl T lu • Y' f'. Y y irk sa s A .;,R.i f sb Y P , • � e":' _y „ n e � r y .r ' y ';e . ,4° F ,, Fe:l &ao A and moor n651 1 - n Place may I -. � _ -✓,s { .' r4 w t , , " 1 4Y 4iFf {� o- e�'N�` . � „xv �..rL y �'M t' � �t '�'. f� Minimal environmental impacts d I lack fr�In3 R Ilk; y l.e f -F , . d, 1 qw Ml dM S oF h new aevcll I be, ` ^ 16 .4., �� `' �" x 45 : ..t 4 +=" ; ,n. P "',x- 7"'4'#• - ,E}tit. h,,4.4;. ,}f * r .' c µ I l , f Qi- L . S7" a *jr•+,�,, •. r CONti • � r' Y �' 'k'+`'.t �. r� it ' '5 1Mllc does II' I. r bend due lo to* R consuming I 'M� , q #S. "fie ? ,f -. . i ,i 'A 3 ..r-§" ' . '`'"b'pt° 1 + 7 ? 0- a t l a•-'4". # ; r g l u ny In I.. .,.i " Sfa , ,, wv e * � + m . �-"+ ,�, y r. f .�r 7"“•Z‘ .a rc y�+ -„ 1�K - Scheduling conflicts m m ssels and upland t� ' tak iP4 « xe r 1 i 37s'.J` +° ,e, �,y °r ° ' #' r ya , 1 t �i. . ' �. - {{r ; y ' I e _ � '�' x t w %' i 3 "' f t L ' vr ? Y„CL f DEi I1a di Svehicle transfer (no _` � ' ; w '0 ' y :''k S ({ . \'' 'R _ � ' 1 . .1 I b del ,fir ∎.!• t .kw t �„ 1 v Undesirable o g 1 d 1 P to ocean surges ea swells . Ck'r .pa4.^" Si' � ` Tw .. • tl; krone l0 strong winds } 7 t " �'v. 9 . I ti ,.r r d- j ° N b +' • upland staging d access sit, Iscwre C 1 d iii 6 11 _ sp a ' r . `,,.- , ' .-- I _._� `� .�._ .._.� * #_ i1y�•, f t 3s y - ? , y „,. r l u t F"' s � d Y l u .,. .�....__ � ., I �y " $ ri > i< P ' i� s e rr' >. .-e. 4 „tit' „W e k ` at 1, . ;, ?° '^Sr : 4 4 r` i Y. E Py'I, �, Y d 4 - . a s * $ 8✓ft • tn �. f r 42.LLL 4'i ` a. - �"C { , r yw ,, L;f�O 5 eN CP"" ' -s �' ' r ' •x: sf r ! R � '� 1.� • a w . ." " t "may �..) �.`3 w- ^` < l 3 t r ,a1,:0 s s6 p? u M , t # . K -Ir. -yr , t t' r ,, ti e ; Yr \ A" „,. .. ,w „4",., ,. a , u ,SF " ...),R k 'S Lt k , y.enfi� .,„ i ,s.'...,-,•-1„:4,.344;$::;:14., � : ` F r � ' e ,.f8 f . t. , g ' r ` ' ., 'v.J ' t Se , �... . ,44 y 4:4c * e V.e : ' c: ..- v m > els.• '}ter na - < r. • , t ' , '�K i ` sv' s • T - , 4 � yy `` , �"✓ri,tiu' 1 u 'str r E. y r >. a ko• f� x.' e` Y ' '¢= .�r n &1 r n .Ly . ei'+ r � r . � k ; �„ L S e ;re rot '1' I� �n^ , M r 5 , i�J°SS � ,� a v. � tl� ..,, a , h 1 '�-• 5 + "ny�° y `f^ a+y L ° , F c�:, �' ^r n��` �1 -` _, � t ,., : # ,t� tr ,c t' "5` ;S:4-4,- . ` 4,, ,, , "t '�2 t`�" � ;��M' '.e 5441.21 ' f ' fik a d .s .N K Y" ^ `d`' ,, V iiri ' .a "e° ,,rr g ; t� `.aNg'.', d *- - "'M /V K ennrc o ll r - g. ^ .c 4 ;" r S ' L A ' ' 4 I- w SS S 1 ¢ E t•ilk• Y ' FI r :. n ti £ ". % .�, v e S" y ,,.13 k ' R'„ F x , x�" 'T .. .«' ^,yt'. t, n `' �' ? ewe . r 3 . * ,�,, - � d , * . ,v ° _ , fir y 7 r EV • "�f W ...f �h r w + y h .:1 , t kTZ .• '��Ry aAi,' .ryN R �a .t{ �, ~ ��. L „ 9 . �` ,� f p�u , �O ii viM , Y t F � �. 1 A M` a ' t 'X` 'ti.""‘ y, 3 } t P .;y . - .IFf' t °e x y1 }MO"7;Sr }10'1 o. d iL pe .4 #' 4 sm tr f r e . '„ '� '4:" .' LV. tia.C /rite �4 .6 ”. , , x ' , ,LY�+ o S. . ^ r �..¢¢ " orb � 'd�'ren�' } X ' "'l, , , r x , 3 , 5 �° � 3. H" R3. '+ � ` r9 ,'Z a ti' " ^ a; IGl r :. +diFf S 1. '.,y ' y �tra ,'- e' •9 " , a,�° t 5 n'^ :1 4' .. al 'e• ° -`' + f s t• `7 ; � ^", l,sx �C � h T, v� Jti ?. `�" ' f < I w. a r h5f.. Ht�� ��JJyy. 't z ,,. r qA ,� y x Rt e CS +w .. � vA' � C: ^L? b x . , ?I, -r c r +'9' 1 a ' VIC #L Mss"•,$i ?' r r "* � r \ t i t tF i S},. { n,? ' t sb U ,.., ,a . � g a f V"'Fe+':"�`• b4 f�.m. ' r l:: Ek $ � � '''e, 3 " ,N, ' .� t i`� l ey ?.4 '� ,�2�y` *1 ,t,£„ �2a ei ' 4- i �x'rl iA e `,C a ar 1 k' y » A r Y v F, E d rt ^ " f ,t "A1,,, oC 7 Tom,' q ° q: •d'i,. k,+^ 4. 4';d'M"� tF w...5 i1� 'v t:3�"k xh: , ku""A 5'.:+ t d M�t' r x , 5. .*` `(' y . rA �� Q � y # R -4*;; �; 9 r 's °" v P'': y e 1 a wr 6 :-'4 sett IN -P PM' � , U .. +` ii. ` 's 540 , P4i -. 0 s*' t. r {` f' g � w r ,3- x ' < d P iesi 4 +" t FIGURE 3A- PIER 2 PIER 2 - ALTERNATE 3A / EXISTING DOCK Kodiak Ferry Terminal ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 6 PUBLIC FACILITIES PROPOSED KODIAK FERRY TERMINAL 0' \K0k \68938 \M1Recon report \Recon 6 -10 \FINAL RECON FIGS 6 -I0 \fig }A -Pie, 2 Site.E„g KODIAK. ALASKA • / S1r. {� A Y}f„ kh �M� h }� _✓ * i P' �e : j .� b s �'t. �:+ 71 yp�' bst i d Construction C i $6 m IIIon 1 Y ' ` X �j�Y'4 FS TY Y •��9yy ! / Ni..6 • ,( Ay y 4, 4 .0 i1 + -�_ t . a- S ' 1'{. fVia C 4' "sat d !"' .F` PROS e to oteN all'b db'bo�h the Kennicort and .. ''{v ` • >i. f o- " f �. ['v .} „ ,A V %. `r ip -ci H . j � T� .`.} � +^ i � r te" " *oh at' >, � ,, � s Y .mo m r Et Y • '‘.1' 'L .y • � y i z f a ,. . , F °, " " l ^` •, ' aaP'+ • ,''-*r 1 .3: ,...,' � y , - Es '4 s Y 4 . . Ir p ose u a ' b ig gre moor, g 'geed' f vessol \ d 9 ' r 4 t Y n` b : , r r 'r"` e U} �y�i ] c d g i m d safctY r • " , t '4. °F �' �a° ? 2�. ik *A-, � ; ,,-- / - i'''r ♦ ii 11 ' Milne dxkad ng � , essels s -andu upland a -sa •. 4 't1; `� i 3" � 1"'W'- <« f � " 's "' ° ° �" f rt R I iwl I �e e I a rdue u i "� ' &. "`A �,tr , te; � M . � .a.. L � � '� ^ p ce f existing J c p � more 'S Cr % sr' t * c - - > ; t -- r r Wp r •> `' � CoNs a z� ,y . r ; x , , � ' . v " � # k y �..x _ 'r 1 x#`r' R`' ..' " a `�`: A not have k' ienn due to i) ' �� "" 0 ' W xG t SZL S'C •s . 4 �f ` f b other q x f "� , � '� 4 �i f " 'nr s c h e d u l ing fl �s with olher. and u .F � iM /� 7- ,c`� [ .r r E L M -.. J ,n, • s the dock d upland aguacs n ma, con(lia dti vJ t , 0 r 4 1 - h . • Ud bl mooring location due to sop osuam .M �t N�i . 4'P Y`o' i I x� \ ti _ ,M� F'• su g , Y S Its S+'. ,5 ' F K �tzt � r J limn` t S d t ,,.��: K 1 J U n st g 6 d _ ' areas d R ult LO secure • C acrele o Shea P/ �° `'' 3 ` 1�- t.. -i' l.�, �j} 4 'k';i ii iar r a y l! Lefarp�► ■ W +' t y � tip .� _ ... I. (.' rrir „,_ , P 41G �, ti' - ` � 1..?'�i *s` J9f • Fe � , � A. -, ' . a , ^j ,� a g(+d G' � tinny F lL �-� -� 9 ��.. '-- . �..,.mz., ._ 'ws 'b t � '` h i „ ..,', ... -4 17 :ILIA vVasp f r l iii — E , \• Nods "�.zc. �" Si n M 4'e �' ., ,, 4 .." W Zr a ` • ' '' �G3. y.. W . s ,� Y i e5 ', §,,. •#, c °w - 4 4, 74., + �S -.'. : e. S y" •— �r v +� c &'F+'t l v ' b a k ' ' , 4 .v 4 %. .' 5 w ' t f , t t ,s4 ... � ' �'k h':,:W ' T2t_ y/ " a -t �y , ' J k f>: ! d r pc T �c� • g , y Brldac,. 'i or xi W i '' _u.. - 2 A'a i+ r`yL•�y✓ "4 L u d �i . . e C 9 t * i' 11 t '. „L ,� L Il S 1 >i t ��7�J✓ r + � .. `' ti �.s@ ), r �'4Z � .7+ * t Sr s+t F r � � . ` e�f:.w 4 s v �tt "t< •gli .�, 'fi { , ,.14:4-,4e:). ' ec. . _. y;,.4' r * u �” v- tr '.'. fi F x •f '' y ' ''''•'+t:m' -� , Y . - ` •T , g-ak ^� s r § r � '�,' d"° L " y c$' } M ViT slum nn ,. y , ° ' � WA � . � t, .d : . . t 6 _ F - M X t zMZ d + ' ' Sc. �'E . •Ie ir, ` �' x� ' t "s' _. a t „r -.1.4 T '� t -wc h c # N r ° FY3` L v:�- v !+ h "P` � Y p a } ' }gy a !F + 'r . k .. 3k yt, d k.. " a- a se, -:1/4 },, t p aW.0. ra, , .. < t • tsz ' v "r✓ ' tom+ � ` ' ' ,. ,fi >>w'*/"' t aA '. d" ',} ,v ° '� t ;;; t. W " .raft. t .... , . ��ii dl f e e t r`' 4 r' , . " "" o- t a g e a =y fl ' `en: „( fi x ,. f t'A ' T r:, .x y . tC 'rN -. rr,SaPh rlLK'x,,fr ` t Y 14 i a g V4F t 4.. ak +,8' ,'. ,(' l , .x, 1' A . +'{x w..0 46 r + 'i l 1' R 9t tii �7'Yv '1 4 5 - "L e N e fit� t a `. a 's } L 1 1 t -fc. , ,Y Y " 't 1 � 1 r ." s'ti 4n� ' �' Yl' +i r+^'«�S. � d �4+.�a�' kx �' ,, ,, -af � . R f F]r i� p ±. "�' � " �. �'' .�y,�}� ri^.v� 4 � ar tA 1., v "�} s 4 s + v ✓ F r' �rYx+�1P+ 'd p, .�- R ,�+ �. p t5` 1 x '' ' t o- 'h+� a ' .7 "Wu' f1r .: + y , v'' v r $, i ,, s'T � ,, e. 4 0,41 V ' { �'J � 4' � R _ y X - 07: - C4 t i t 'Y u 1 s g � �,}, i%"i Y >t r.� - "#F'„ .as 74g, F ? 1 7 7- 5 � C� EEn J F ++i ^ � $ � Lh ,e ltacr) A < L x yYiTS � Y -7`4 "' 't y', 1kY .A x i4 ° i } ` , ` • x ,� ', a.r Y t t r{ 4 r . ' X .," r t i m ' Y } a , q ' s i'- �w " m " i- " p N ' " � 's x p , *` x e. : � n r 3'a • FIGURE 3B - PIER 2 PIER 2 - ALTERNATE 3B / NEW TRANSFER BRIDGE (West Side) Kodiak Ferry Termi PIASKA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION & P 5IRLIC FACILITIES PROPOSED KOOWK FERRY TERMINAL 0: \KE4 \E39?S \MF\Re:pn a psrs \Peon 5- 1 \FlNAL RECON FIGS 6 -10 \Flg 38-Pier 2 &S et KOOIAK ALASKA • t t `' 't-+1 8�fF yx .eM , Y Ap , /ik'jew4 R .� * rt , * A } f >r'�M7 e e. di {A m:. r ` ' ,{ ' s , .,,. y. y f ry bI ccd Construction Cost -88 million � ¢ ', f�'# `�±.'�! g'S._ d'a, ;? '",.., � ,` kesi 3 '' - O. - r q , , �. ; ` S -7, ay$> q - N A. d . 1r av .*' "a, � PROS ., ,.a'.± tv ,+ ;Y "-] a L br > 4 f q , "v•-‘;',J •.S y 7 1Nw y ,y,}, 4 s+ a , . ,�,r � G d uel accesslbihn '%e "`' ' 3 Y^ - R 3 r - :: * �q . +}. ` - v / 'A : , r r . r -r _ ,( 1-"i"i'bra �Ax ` K t ally er usedbyboth she antl . �' *-1' i !4i 44" 4 r s„,, o / 1 S , ' - .f'. w ' . / .Cf t T. . p y / , , sL,�Y '�. the I' lumens ,� a# M� - , N + � b : .' ''' - % �F tr ' 4 _ r y L. z r • 1 Proposed ock and mooring greatly speeds t I . A ,e Sr 74 A M r ' ' ` ^Sa j ..... " / . - , '"--'1/4.,^,t, o r r d s l d suf ly u 1 ` .- yam, 1 ''A , � » ; Y rie "C, 4' ; 1 . N A N , Mt a 'F i ' a ` t (� Existing k d ystructures Il a es _ " tl 1 V e , 'ew n.r' Tt Y � ^' � F " ' v a M'.t.r • !, ° t � t e a [ a,`� ,. . . - a i R�+'L"4 a { +(' N i ly 1 i I1mV'a due lo •" A 1d" -0r '�` s ` ti 3'A it,' ..- 7 1 c . I` � . k e s g .fy.F + ` � ri Ry Lh6 1} r , t om r l lru i f l g dock R mooring • e zt i; n. _,�, t'� d .e r4� W . l ayydy " at +, �lir 'e q - - -, .a. g _! l CONS • j '' v , -• ,, tz x" Ir.- -r ! ry- . ` / 4 • - ' 4 4 ,a .. - ".--1. t, 4 ne frequent not h - I r berth d and • E+T "A } s a �, 1 ♦ 1 q 1 b th es I •''y W' a Yr. f� . ; ,.„," _ • ts;II b ) y, • _ �j T'` AAA P' 1 Scheduling conflicts m m I. and upland 4 an ,.7y •r °4 � , 9 + n \1. \ �{_,w _ l s exist t To ` in f44 - t 7p 1 ��....+ - Y' _ • .� P 11 d 1 f F dg f I II Ola P TO Wwtin uddng/ r -f° �{�. p' ♦ 'Lh h d : d pk d r.^ xA, t b wol sneuer rcrlrrj �� f I '7n:71 - 40 _ v ". t c �0 1 g d • t • " 3 \ � � J )�/ /� y < � Upland • sing g d access n difficult to sewn • b� i ' Q cc:,,_ } i } I ` I I r ., / 1 t.p A "y * J t> . _ _._ f C` I ' - - l .L3 'd �sy S� � n . : �'.v } _ �� tR, t • ' 1 , . . # y,,. q „s. ' f rrlL� 4 `" A . _t4,: -a i; a a z n • �3 N d 'WI ra h ti ./.544‘,.. r ,--41-4,0•4\444, " _ --'1"---,4y,,,,„,. __ L� tl ._ _ ' + c m ..+ i • d ;') . ::" 4- ;•; 0 /41,"" ' - el ' M• — Y :f it r F ";�M ,4:A/ I - : wcoS, �` " ' A F i l, is e , , ✓e > 'x 5" a 4 ..* ?r, . • fi ]' r . , e • 7 Y 1 "4 S o i � J 1 D IBit ...� v'P� � - 0 ,4:/?•//1 --, 1 , 11 - 4 . t us.1.. . . r i ': q d i a�` v °r �Px �. "3 77' e � �'G � a n_ ,3S Za 1 _ .- . �e oa4 a ', _`�.,( -„✓pt Transfer 8n �" }` � } S te . >+ +v..P'�:"`i I -r+, � '+. � •4? - . +L ., b '14. i '�; t N" �1 `^m z 9 + ,,, ;: r r � , , 4 r T a Z L w r , ,., e e h . • i /g, 3" r'mk -3 a (oe� c,a ks . ar ' c M c a . li s“ . l% r Tb •K 'F,.. F Y/r / rfi • 1 s 4 1/- e i ue ? # $ . � r• .' . , N4 d+ l' r: ' xr 4 t* - ) - 1 ; + � , '1tx, 4 Zi i •� tX�* '. .,,, •r¢'. 3 F "' '8H `, ,, W .y ,-4,, .; 't 44 ,4 ,4 42,01;_z„,„,, kr a�'� 'K i `. p, e' •%•.: _C. -y a�44u'a ,' T 2'7 'P3 "'Tat-stria tt.ei- .r`i +i 7 '� . F ?� ' ,AM /r'rtennloott " 1 " $ 4. 's 'v a ` „ rNti,'?' erl dge Lr71 Tow > a Q r "l "e ' rr g ..e ,va5 � °.” '"k r 'k : I M% V ( 4 7 ' t en � , v :g �' y� ° s ,, ` ' rz -, ..a , k, ` : ,. * y • r^;* - 't "', 4g 7 , ' '' • / ' 4&241, 4's'�r ' s 4 C. }} v '' +-r a 'k''b.'e,. o » ,f 41 '3 Y' , � c . ^g 6 ''°. r. / r O' •• . 10 , „. * +w att ° 5 ' f 4, � ° • r e ^ ps 5 ry` s 1 v 3;, ;,ia 4 r rL ee .. s" , '-r� F 'err t * 4 " ` v ; �_�. ,� °r „ J s A t ., 3" ,f� � b_: : lr. Y 2 t ry+ y, ' 8 , ` A R , rm; . r�.:� ' i", c'x ',Pr ., &Re „ t• � y ' A 5 ~r .t. itt r °9 'ARyr a a't' rr'_ ja ,' r 9. vi -. �'" r " ii`i5. ,, v ` u 4 " .w. rV r '' °C ' i i ' s w v 1 R) � r F 7 uP A •l • a L ""4 * Z ' aa S ` t ' e e ,.A tF 'eb ",}�1' " 't fi" . dt S :1- 444 A .!y b g ,y` *, j ''. r ''<w ' 1 4 4:4 ` ,,4ii � b kJ ' ., f m -d � F ® to r s `� T r ia 3 ' r O' LA t 9 � .a � j s � t ISCAt� t "` Ti S "" �A✓ i . Cry - " e '' l yc '' X'Y y (; '4 zk'i4 ' 7 . y ; a , n ' , .` .� ar;^ �, y x . gr s j; *"� �^ .r r 3 $ � '` 4 , ? , r ' v, q+. ,a ry ^ Z �` ` ; 'P AC Sg t, • . • FIGURE 3C - • PIER 2 PIER 2 - ALTERNATE 3C/ NEW TRANSFER BRIDGE (Middle) Kodiak Ferry Terminal ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF TMNSPORTATION & PUBLI0 FACILITIES PROPOSED KOOIAK FERRY TERMINAL 0: \K \ 4 a 9936 MF \\Rew R NOL n report G - 10 \D RECON 0G$ 6 - \Fla 3C -Par 2EVg KODIAK ALA$HA ' 6. P ''` t • / sae '� � p .' Y Estimated Construction Cost =S22 million 5 a 1 .. >., l - a t II I ej - r S� PROS • a° ' u r I � , �� I �' et Minimal approach on existing property pp',. 4.1` II w .. k (II I 2 . - : _ t T � ,. ' ' ' e l r/ 5 � . • • • fair veered accessibility _ P.. a°i �� `r's .✓ _ t .,+'n8 �I >. !" � II �1 .. '+^ ,� a t y . . , rt / / e r- 1 1. L x • Generally well protected + 71mI • Can accommodate both Kennicott and Tustumcna t y [ F ' •1 *aye • load transfer bridge provides efficient vehicle transfer for Kennicott x e r F ' �� ; ' I "�� , d - l p C 1 Gristinn Property s, I I 3 . "1 - .....2- " ` - �tLine- - 1 t n aim -q nL t !1 r 1-1 • Ability lo e atoprovide cent security . • f _ �' ;'^p -r- r t •Close awes to city center and visitor amenities AooroxmaLe roa� HU ( j'Y1 1 'a - e'1 l i. I • I li h b19Fi11 ( $f I. I ell 6,�• , Cu; p �t I g Undeveloped, mostly ily in-water 1 / : III' # a _ I t L . a Undeenloron,mostlymteareusto • 1 • ` \ _ 'N' L , '4F � , f, 1 tl t � H igh environmental fill and rip Impact dare to largo arcs of • 7— anal Biala, \ I i l l a f A il t r P rone to fill and winds i that Is required • L ` �, �� / It ' iT. r fi �5:d Prone m strong winds m winter \ I , , s+. .� t I • Requires expansion /modification to existing Corps - `� . n } '� +; - , , of Engineers breakwater structure Y 8nr/Pr - ". .FCwra - ul x, e .' r� ' I j' � � la a � `. 'i Road improvements may be required for ferry traffic I+ +I1 " r.;‘ I t° -'��` l access via Shehkof Street, which is presently a X1 , p ( � ' , • r K • > a l ' I '`�`t low volume city street ( \ Ill ll11 . ''' - t i r Close proxi and • e ex is t ing v 1 1 1 �Pnrkn q � ' ' � \ � t I _ H r G1� � s ° • �e g r navigation channel / r `, � \ \ / / J r , 4„x / - `� \ k�/ e r G^° e , s ., • • Frequent small boat and other vessel traffic in the €' fa 4: \ ./ � I � 5 / r a 9rng Are v�'l ur �l . ' �- r !v t • _ ". area p 1 w Ii 4. " + C r • ROW acquisition complicated as COE owns 1 P ZOO LF " �, r 7 /-• i e ?S.t.Ci I y. fl a•3 i r ,1 a , r I. breakwater / 1'1.111.1 I l ` " t 13 I ustemena uses platform dock and elevator transfer P 1. • r 4 1' , K V _�y �(I t 5' l for vehicles ,. Lent -in for y \ '/`� .s S y _A s "`' iin eau ` --,,.V.:- N 1 ttry- -JP Le +I v re Trim - 115 A_ Pc e .F r.K. zlsant_ FEEr1 ' ' ■ ' j Tr 'r ' n \ 1 . . •I . Pale G o . R eT. f a oonictc. --- Y 9 B, '• -- C-. s. I frr'7usfL7me ° arc+ J�..'N9nnrolt —. > >, _� p e a s I i I +d tl el y a ap. q x ,z‘,,' � �« ct '-' -e4''!-- �, t / r .. ._ .. "+tY.; / / I - n e T l "4 ,," el Z."r • ,.. . '..•.m r ' .�+' • I 1 :44.," '.• r ' :: , .'`� :a.,,s � / i$ 7- ' Ti':.'" + � -. i "'r. ....� _ . " ` a I p' . : r ,, . f+: r "�� _ v. ,. FIGURE 4A - ST. PAUL BREAKWATER ST. PAUL BREAKWATER - ALTERNATE 4A / SIDE -STERN LOAD Kodiak Ferry Terminal AiFSMA DEPA RTME OF TRANPORTATON d PUBLI0 FAOILmES PROPOSED N001A FERRY I TERMINAL 0 : \Kdk \68938 \ME \Recon report \Recon 6 -10 \FINAL RECON RCS 6 4A — Paul Breakwater.dwy NoOIgI<ALASKA • • • - +4T • .S F+'=r t �' a � e , t„ _ n << p ' •"""'� Estimated Construction Cost =$27 million • 4 d. r 3 .'N .+o - � / / - r t= • • l 5 1Y PROS • f 1 F / . -= ' 4 4 l 1 � . � • Minimal approach on existing property w,q � =Ill !!c-4, - � - F . I IIJJJ��� '} ,,.,r • Fair vessel accessibility . r " , .l q if _ .1e r/ r �!1" - - I Y vvv. • Goner well proteded S - .ice�'Y Esv +," t(r r l " • Canaccommodateboth Kennicnll and Tuslumena $ y a r j Z ��I �j yyyp �' ° � • Stern load transfer bridge provides efficient vehicle \ .r �5j °1 a ` j ^ I transfer for Kennicott -". ° � $a'/.Yt,n Pra ePt ?MC' • , i . 1 } t+ 0—,, � + o • Ability to provide upland and vessel security P � _ Cine 1 A "j ..' I � '; I t ))) a + t I r r + Y I : � r • Close acces to city center and vi rsea amenities - L am ount of in -water fill work re wired far all _ -� J . 1 l ye ' um. _ F + 1 + al ternatives at St Paul Breakwater sue I� &ProsrmotE«7oel t ;ill + y� , ! -11 l 3 • No apparent debris trap � o -r a Fal / � ' ��I / �;g r � L Z : 1 I CONS t,. `�' / (/ � 1 _ , I(I .�ry b '-F r + +• • I ll construction cost E c Termi n 4! Did \ s *\ _ i t . \. jy :_ , .., s y • e� 1 ^ r J • Uev, in-« sLL x\ �, it (. �I +N JF .•r '� "� •Hig cnvirotvnentaeloped l mostly impact atcr due to e large area of \ ` \ ,, ' \ _ @ '� '7 q Q � •y am( in -wate fi and riprap that i re 1 'al 1 + _ • Prone t o stro ng winds m wins ter quired ,.•FSader =StrGCturs x f - , 37 a " I 3j i �' A, • Requnesexpansmn/modiGLSUOnto existing Corps £ I � of Engineers breakwater structure / ( x l i ,,•. _ • " t� \ - " - a • Road improuemen+s maf be requucd (nr ferry traffic • idibKr+nni - 1 •`• Y >• ii >/ i i i p,t. �T•wY III .t access vie ShcllkaC Street, which Is presently a `h _s AI / /� �iilll��� ' .r- 4/k r ` �„ �,- - ; e 1 low volume city and e N / + Sf4gin �� 1 L a 1 r yL L ,� 'dc> •Close proximity end exposure to existing vessel ii* it A • IA I r reb e / ;- ' rr f s G y- navigation channel • v +�! S111 F 1 t I� t , - / •frequent small boat and other vessel traffic in the s a•4 �[ 1 \777iii +` /i L F" ' _ '� L 11 1 , •! ` 1 area • r - :te +. � a•• } • P� �°"^:*�.h^ 1 1 ROW acquisition complicated as COE owns / Psi J �t` ` v s ' , ` - ' � tf ' _ • breakwater ` as I i, 4.e...5 ` t C %�` �• Tustumcna uses platform dock and elevator transfer Illt v q r `� for vehicles {d } LeaU In ohm f � • � q 42 t 56 ' ` ' `� o f t � � 6 • ° �I yy � 1.ar +.,' d4`+ ff t J '" isC LEIN reET) :r 2 , i '�. 4 . . 'f. , =r ' , y am „ rte`£ =9 ; s " P o 4t rr �. r - - 1. L'rrd y F- _, x .^+ ./ ° it: "v ,v s , a - FSr iu5rum n4 ord- Kennicatt ! "— S-;s" k \ a r • r a 1.), p j 4 . ea it -. b r j �r`T'\i ° •R 33gy , �S' / ° /. `! "''.• x t`'fl 't vw r A" G t•. °��` e iy.+C iY..:"�.•�. f!i.. y,l. } ..,._ ..r`�LY+ta.dew...,° , _ :d ;' *,. . ,... ,�_.✓ u. AYv_ - . FIGURE 4B ST. PAUL BREAK WATER ST. PAUL BREAKWATER - ALTERNATE 4B / SIDE -STERN LOAD Kodiak F arry Terminal ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION & PUBLIC FACILITIES PROPOSED KOOIAK FERRY TERMINAL 0: \Kdk \68938 \MF \Recon report \Recon 6 -10 \FINAL RECON FIGS 6 -10 \Fig 46 -St Paul Breakwater 444 KoowK, ALASKA 05.t., r 1' - r' - 'r'' 3r{;• r n< rF6=}a' i' "' ,,, w . .ten f.F 8 ,.. r : +* g +.Y 4�.vr.. ` fm�r3c S , N 5- h .x; tip. � 4 'rn 'f G �'. x 3 E I I dC nq I n C SL . t in 1t '' � t �Y^ +: � �{ � � a � ft� ] A L f l . � ft Id t' ` }ke 1 M`i t ,r%ki* 4 'K j I� T J I II b conthtions ... g e- ty, *A 2 r8 . - Sr 0.,`„,7 1'1.2:1 .F K I a T. • ` V I d ) S WO BAY I r " , .' M' I c r l p I • / <. I " / . K'> '+.. >% '.. b "Ttj }^,. yf��'�ft `", .R c 3 i ° d !49 � 3? P L q a 181 k I I s In t 411'1 t 4 }'K- :j:*k�z' "vN' > % F - 'r : ` au :.Mel bnl s - m wn I I . m �do� On i ,a " P P d I l 1 b d6 B I P d- a 'n 4 d M/V Tustumeno y F ender S i ru cl y e y , r 4 % • t ' `� - fExshn Sheei Ple 0 e'n 'SA/ d. fn c }tbaY at Y,f a 9 P r A pl I P I d C 1 staging d other � r k M /VdXenmco " C Bulkhead Dock - ',ff . ' • �F"i ev f S t /. a d6 d b l l fi p w • A ' , 4 l y" ' r ; ° e P" de upinna vnd p rt I F h d S I I lively I (6-miles 1 c Ir ) t S }'Y.. y # I i k Ne Term nal A. 5 q q nt I' e 61 d mr • > y sy A l , Conr. Burner /CoPU Bu ldm i ' ' i r3, Y *::A .e-. €I TT r k 3 p e 1; 'te IY 9 t '$t ,u ty t i.1`f r `F . .IF/"i " ss„ p i t t 1 1 '''' "�' ( L y P Exsmg ?'5fie N 1 Retained p et P e 11 p a a1 1 e Lf h $ ..". �E } {� n" \ I s . *, p . rr ry t g 9 I I15 uuls�de of CilY fue aP I a v I +++5" 1 '1I - - �e T / 5 v € „ is$ n u Foc lrl N f d n ir u fend„ structures required Rte. #;j.,. - --= -- . - - -. t . [b i RIalll db IPI IIM1Itla9 l'vo as 1; .t sY _l � *rsa t/ `��� Sheet P ' • „and p la ' F w� 5/09 9 Area u i F �a as 4' ay ..r d o _ 7 . 4 J d steel that f o r large amount 01 structure ,�: }' 'YF y T /rd00 /ane (I�'�L - _ -"+� " N public undoes, I il'i 'I bleb � St i"`n Y2' ° � > �I .._ _-� _... �.�_ c_ / t r /.. _ I uur '/� •„..,,,....._ y € `? C ! \ ' 4 M II " I 1 K B y r E \ A �, c n H � ° , l. -- .. I J V T �1 Nb I I b d nIM1 r ' es `d �., —� � � � 41 1 mr naa a n e r e P ry • . ,d aW #V#f�' w"--'2'w YVt \ 1 i . r },] s� e n I Ihfml I se • 8 3` € L�� '—' � r' - M1 4 " E t 5 a ic e RoMV would e b P cba„d l i I < �" .tY .a{ i f ',. v* , `Vdlg . 4 rL Rf. ?�'�+ -/ a 'P / ! h k I • I I � Y � k f '� °' �� }. " � � L tF . . w 'Yei}r ✓�xy �.-- 1) y y*" Y S ' t, L T�" f9 5 I I -y !Tr. . wx 'I �. ____— ... 7 -r'�ir�- t t � j.t,'l fr y 0 • , h t...44••-;,1/4 fr . 1 'n1- t g ` '�'. f '�`,j . ,- ,�,{� r 3 � '. Y y t ^ C ' G ° j ' 9 .. i,, '(.' yT l % r,ei , ,-+„ -R.& '+�j r '. s . ^'T�. °3� A � q . Y J �Y. <. � .g+7 ^�+- ■ 3 j R � ,, m. "' --z. i �"R 1 f' C {,yh y Zylr: i L .'M. y�j' , ^ .E� 1310 .' = !q'C,ry " -",-+ F 1 J v4' , T . q{: >� .; � W.T I ��" +e � cn+'rt , [R+ iI" i u d ki''A ..,f f / '', X' l a.. a s ,, 14Y t d ory �!"1/�f ' t idyI` . y • . " .1 4 ∎ ud > ifir '"k R / 1- t roal. i. LL <f T2 r i } S ' A"s N . }. r . e • fi£ b'N` s"9 ,r sit r 7, err r:a /s +r. � ` . 4 . :7".1 > �' St 'a. f • i .-..' ry N "3 �:w .... 21 ...b 1`- . .. (.'d _ N -K( .. yW f f re , y rr;; < , ' v : h F • 1 , y r }c t. M 4 J ° =' vx -,. ' -s ..r - .. :..y..... e - I - I, :Y Y ' W 9'F 6 +"' f ('�pY`c/ r i ipq u r F ..,..„/,... ; ' f , `ri �` . �C ry n ,fi° '7.2. j T' Ml' , , :ca >K < / g la ram ? � x « ' .. f % ,.: 17 .::i ' . , , ✓'4 'tf. t + a 4 r , i'�' h +3!' 7i" ,I, � ' t°" ... i . : 1.+ .r r G' ? F , J H Y� �� a . fir t J d, ✓ y 1 W ... . c,�0 r e" �' G� a L,1 � .:. + � t? t {i �lF L fi� / rre s I} � t ��'tf /J ` ••'M' ' yju'Flf r'"/ t'. `1 1 1 €' > i I e' ,M / 1 Y., Y .p P 4y Lr` ...c."7-1r-----: I r$ ns.u- 1 Y !r.. a • y ys s S � v T "' r $ G r fi J f'�f3 < f '. lY 7dM A ti>'�,. UI rY fi ., _'Y - " ..0 �v / -.. ;r:'�y r f .: /, n .L /°�/ F , ` ' './.r f -k ti' . v r � . e .oT % 4 . ` ( • ' .,,y&' q � T 1 b "-C `- ,. . w ' , u � ,} S ` V.li { at I,. � r< ,- .t +.F II ,�.+.. Z!�'"'' 10". '+y:17:11,41% • I T � # r aj 1 f- ' .'s ' a -- { c -75. -' I 1 > '� 1: . "�[,I, Q'i / � ' q �. ,,,..p, y { l S 'p , ,. , t I .L . s { f .RI .'' a" ! F r :t l ,� F �' .�,. -f {� 'n 7 I � / '^p ,'y'' r�>r f' ,} +3r 5 4 a .4 'a T 7,�� o} rf ..�K t r ie �y „c. .. "c � Im �¢ tt Sk do or ,.;s 1 '3 3' Ste" \ .l & '3'.r l .a` �i L €.fig / .✓ r� (t T frAce �11 v ft W nn 4 -h- r I° ,F "s, is. ' / + �,, r . +'y .. �.;.p lw , ,.. �+ ,g' e . . i lT + SI Yf , n 5 . ' 3 1' ' i V '� Y 1 * 1 4 V ! r t ^ai K�F 1 1 / ' y t ,.S d> C ' .. re ': , i , iz ?fis,,. { be .lie,.' �5 . . r ' r ' �� "A' 'AA:, Gf .�' i � , �+r � F ° Wt r f t i+. :w ,� r {/ { ' ( 7 ',5 ' Q' 'u ,M,. 'I. K . t r, Ju cf`4, n . .M1... SJ . y. ,fl'itn �.<r.(/I.. .,,,.,~~ - T. G -� , . t .:Z'. FIGURE 5A -LASH DOCK LASH DOCK - ALTERNATE 5A / EXISTING SHEET PILE DOCK Kodiak Ferry Terminal MASKA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION A PUBLIC FACILITIES p - INJFI 89SOIMPIRecen nPo'11&"" 5 - "RN"' Pocmv nc5 s - )el i9 SI -(ASH eca PROPOSE KOOIAK ALA51(T TERMINAL - • � � �� ' , °- �x s a '• ' R r" %. �''X`•'^F" sr ''3". h7 f^' tl° ° ta ` O"p s , r %,dz s z, 4 1e i 4 k + 3 y;� e Estimated Construction C I SlGmll r& ° S" ",� -Sr "di S�t ii i ' ^ Y ,,yn � 1 f PROS a' ? '' �` ':5 y a 1• _$ i r` ,. L 1 y C d „ el an b � moor • y ou +r sa r - { 4 xtr 'PoY : 4a t t, t s 2„ 4 e sf. i y ; k,,i' s T Y c J L o s •', A �` .F Ent' N'I w li Y d't WOMEN • BAY t ` } r' c eras r e in r d a c R J anu • r c c l b < lr4 t R y r " t minimal .. ul p I d II t d L j t � St Yu c•'�./' a AiVeig 'N A 6 t T 7 r I t r l r t - required on I gd ktucurcc is S s P -a><4 Y d i n R1" {''` Y k ^ s y '4't ; r .' AIIo& .. Iberthing o I p rto r b and M /Y7uslumeno t n S t t ure / ,, ? s j - 5et d " AVS 4 v5F 4 Y3 ' _!".,`!:!T: r ruc ,> a r ; .L • § y { y , + . r x S- { � x z n. Y#� t5: �a M/VEKenn col ry � y i p � t ?� ' � 3 loading i J Ct • Na _ .i sF "xd ,.�� w 1'kt Siagng A e0 p • * N id PI apt d f (s 1 s g d , r • "" ; 1 - 't>: u L .s �l 400 lane 1) L ^ i ue e a p 'aL o • ' a 4 x P ' \ • I l ngc. t d d • g d traffic (I • f • " •E N ;I .r«44LJ F ti. t S k • T\ - • I ro'a • '�•r , - �`` -^— _�� -� r E s ong Sh Ple Opan. ^�, y p plan0 I .s 1. cu - 1 •} a u , .. w ''" �+ " . Conc Barrier / CaP .. Cell Bulkhead Oock :i CDUV ( mcitI nmq r , i n s.�i,+ "i* r .�/ 4,i* a 1 '' y # - 3 '{. Tu c r . 3 ' 1 L • . r e l t • cl • Ic • �::, ra v xa�+ I Ts i .- .- °` s y { , " I .� ' , y . ag increased towel distance to 6n. and 5 1 - i '. - rt 14,' Lam:: t ' 'r • :I `w g l.. .� `v Y' ¢. . t Ex sl ny Freight * •. s, . t a ' • .. ° ty -g sg / /Leadrng e Fae hty � ,k - p • _ { _ .. 1" 1 ti~ 4-40- Additional tat terc • V y r AS impact proposed an .,. �_ § ! Ld pu atransfer end approach • °, ,,, ...an. t - �� r 1 public t p • n t o p ese a ov d unite h Y F W . t �.` 4 • ) P { ' ' . t y y :4 .r � - v G di1� Facility s t d . f C f n4 pot districts y - Trans/er Br dge q 4 • 4 g § t ex rr,.,,y ' trs e N [ de g Y tcm fed st L Lan't ,, ! 7' fi w ; N � ���� � ��1 � � 'y r ":::•••" rsr dIII aan Ipme u.o- willed, • . Annr mole Tae , ( a 4' a r c T= , �[ � Z y y 1 , ` i �„t yuuf ly of t' ndr p kn 6 4•' \ x 3 pZ,JOI f(l '� /r55 i `' �. \ , �eti� Sh tpil i g I to h mou in K. .L. e �--T'- T � �" 3� e � I 1. � � 10 '•#. y, - � �T n t d I IM1aI e ( f I Tr k • } � Y N o public s IR - I tiles available hY :14r74 New U Fl( > G ,, ° ' "tis, � nle b \ to he tie usy in H� y N I I f / i � P to strong d. the winter , k----C—L___11 h ly e / ,,^J�, 1 » � E y c ' y` " j f Adjacent dock on n r commercial m cargo '! +� ' -4 l t d � ...+' „_ st• 'r 4 1 . 4 ;,. (- x:Sl s es, Cn Il i ith z *- { P rtle ferry I anal use may • v "�+� -- r! a T � p 4,n Ya f +�, n.,, m , -.�.�� " . r.,�i ' F,rtmgd dock dROW Id d be er y ( k � -, ! • 51,•= 7 a . c..— s C4J " F 1 V •%Y'*�.. ✓ 4 � "i} , 7,31; [ M ,3 ♦1 ' '`i d1, I - �._���' ' 1 P I o r w ^f --- M 4 d x �i>t? a � 1. 4 , i��'f\ .a•'' 4 • +� � w , -- -, n4 : , rT .. . --f ..., " i r sk ,xyw ./, .v,f t e �' r t r yf mtreA� r..� • 'A d ''� 'j� { r• , 'rl'1"r 3" i �d 1 ` � 'a. ,st h1 : ` • , t c 'iYtfj r i@ , ; , fr ; \ r � '-s: ^ ' �- ' 'v, : \ nf'. x ,r 1 ri 3 r.. y it r .,t nM r' Q- t �' Fr l:t 1 i ✓,w " n .. 7 ?t4 T. f / ! U Y`t `s.. !� r : t, L �• yt f A a1 0• zs .fJ r. t �f r . T+�, ..., . ,tea x. j GT r 'J4 j f .:�i , � Y 7��''a.� ' ` fk 5 L•,, r't ` ;l' • � r F l t •lgr lire ys .J "� e r „ ✓ r r r } r te" r , , WIW.. e r ,�p Y S' r r2[ 4' •J '- h-` r rr 1�' I`. > rt Y 'Ate: /a° ^ d T°4 K a• .�5 -+ "r_ ry (- atelP• -"' �. n ': p. t - ' • v t .Nr 'I C �ftl)J 't}'� b *'sw+3 \. Yr 1 tJu'f / aA ,5 Kr, ft's` : � . • �, p , e r r 4"�� 't + v 2 ..; - r yy� } ,, :L ' i.. YC. „ y C�3 Pitts w� +' e � .. .',42':'? ) � w 3,1 t `7 N' � -,247 f • Xt r i f ” J s "� n 7, 1, '& 4 `f, vi,,,,.- ^ • -.. c •_ ' ''' pi II r -' �' s 1y Wl'I > . 4 ' 4 . r : eC .' r",". •� j 29, - '� t an I a{ ..f N_ i^a g . Kt` '^v.. .. . . ' s.-Y i ` �F # � :' d #f 8t r w < Yt` er .. - 7 ti t t." v? ` 4.' •4' r .- S r r; ts�1? y r #A,41'rr, x r a r da_� � _ r. F . ' r4'( x '94 /2 1 r r•J-�v F,C -' "r3u \ ,,� . g 1 `C ,..�° Y - 0 i Y t le • r �t r- w - C+a:.. n a / 4 " 14 9 Irf j t , x b„ "k a pt- ., `i''- r .rpm .> �~ '' fy' . . : . Y \ - ' �-r it r 2 t Y J'`L, S' • k F • ' sk 'F r , th• l , ,iyG1`-6 2 a "ptf .t , ) 4 ,:J ` { — ` T d r A 4. 4 + ' ..a„' t'p,? . �,s • o+ J %' r _ r �y� 1 1 . ,e, 8 (. �� , •iL ,S ..iirv : „ . 7 ii .,� . ' 0 ,4 t ,4:7 t " ` fi . 1,'° 1 a:, � t 7114 - '' IRs li,,,tra I S 1$. . ^ .r i 3• 4,4 'L r • ;, y! . 1S 7:114,:" r? �• f i a f - Sr ' f ,,.s.r� ••. r -� t ie l t �;' .pp }p� r H � -Ys f Le ° , P d° r• j7 -ol , t v 'h "+'' i ?u,x it r fN r•�n Ay, .: i i ,f, F+.g` . kocir l; a> ''J A 0, teW.F::1 '' + , t''' 1 '41 Y n ; +,' 1s " ' , " .. " i t �T ,3, Y ' \ - ' ii+'�r' .�r � , . . ^ : FIGURE S � A. � 12-VC.... L : . ASH DOCK r r 5B -L LASH DOCK - ALTERNATE 5B /SHEET PILE DOCK & NEW TRANSFER BRIDGE Kodiak Perry Terminal ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION B PUBLIC FACILITIES PROPOSED K001AK FERRY TERMI NAL KODIA ALASKA O' INddte09.F8IW1 econ .eportlRecon 6- /0VMME RECON FK$6- IOI7958 -USH dock dn9 14; ' 1 ✓ p .0 � � F1 td construction Cost $22 million o ' ' g P^wi �Yj.. 'C ,�1j ✓'!� .'3 f /4y,. ! �` 4Y +.n: PROS • Protected moorage location t o ff` S� R , � T, / /• // W 5 • Relatively Y access i , '+ tt �4� �� y � ,Y / \_ yy ' AA CARLILE Pblcseer Pt nd ictr'I tft b • t� L 1 i,+� < L • r .Y - 7 �F, 0' NI 's ssel M1 th y e th V t 't bard o ' ,$ T t � ✓ '// � � ' �I II I R f } _ e , �" F ONS C nent access �n City center and. visitor / � } x �-r - I X ! � 1c/ S' ,R Site only he accessed b.Tm • s tr s, .s�. tti..1 - ✓�vi '� / - ` t �� ra `" fl' t el d t class � 4 srurm p sl P L load h 1. sf Ub dg , le "tor �, V V� �/ `� C l-V G due re tl e f ffs Rsst ct qrcd 1 ` V v d t d p offshore bath) t A . r` t 75 - �7� i� � - k Propose d ffsho sheet pIC t / g su es 1---- -,.. sublect to long-tenn corrosion and maintenance f ' L / � \\ fi �./ \. \ •. c �-• a /- ---_- I /f sting City transient b o ag '/ ."? "T Z� / \ ,— n>. .. \ / - f- � \_ \ 7 t a li S.^ = / Y • L 't dofisb p dpotential to ee {'� ' c 9 o g a al LO raand _. lac ❑ t - i d / . r , �V b t b ' f e o n tot amine * k F M l .• l \ L f' / ICJ t 1 \ / ;;;CT \ / �¥ cl n c Itr e a° P . ° F L �n n a ,�" . aC / ` 1 \\ Ji i pGP , • . .3 Isl I e a sal h n I • / �V H ' b y t t upland development ��S, _. ! y3 , mI ds parking d opportunities • J I h i rtnl. t o t ��a y "v / d �I Y f ar l traffic floss d potential 1 PI d • I y .\, X. [ r gto do ❑ with b d and 1R V� i�l b .s e Q • r ^ / 'i am ■ \ t e 4 , kcY I r l � d //V iuc'urle.tio , r -, . t ¢ Ka . \ ; 2 .vt � :,E. l r , �k •,ds it _. y, . a e3°' x /e A' lv Oo PF 3 9 1 < 4r i . /tl � �/�.. . V a' C . w.. -i6. T . ;.. --.5:t P.. 'It' : r ' N AT i ', a!�'... : , FIGURE 6A - CITY TRANSIENT FLOAT CITY TRANSIENT FLOAT - ALTERNATE 6A / SHEET PILE CELL DOCK 1 Kotl Farry Terminal ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF TRAMS ORTATION fl PU IC FACILITIES PROPOSED KOOIAK FERRY TERM RL KODIAK ALASKA 0.' 1 C89J91 NFIRecm repwtl Recnn 6-101714.15 AECpN /705 6 -, \/7gta 61 .IL J -2 PIA- I 7 05y /t ns /enf 67.7106g INOk • • IT r j aY > 's ,y . ;t v'r� _ f r t i m f a construction cost $zz miuinn +on � 's^ RO P � hipLn. ` N7'� 4 � � , cY \ �l � / rs .` t � P t t d g lo cat s 6 : 6 v J t � • Relatively vessel access '"` e 1/ '+ Mkt/ - , , , . ,P y m I § � .. A r m t and el f t new by C. ♦ F - i a : 1 i Y " x- p id j ♦ x , : • A HOW . s Iberthing on either port �- ta har f6e lad . ' , y h - { � i / �-`�� — ` I , Y 1 .—e.. Convenient to City' p d l n • + C 4 r . . l� j �j \S/ �5�\ \ 61.E =canes : t ; ^,/ r ' ,s � ' \ , Lasser environmental impact than Ahed dock LA ' "- i% — � !r te s d t ICS: fill d Ge of Die Supported do). ' n, Y ' T" �^ '4' �� � � a / VA r , A CON - • r o �. z ..+ a" 'F.+. " d / / � / \ )� v 15 be' d by ' Tust class . vessels �+ m r ! / Insufficient space t provide transfer bridge le >'� �� , / / / it 1b v— structure, co fa d vehicles d elevator �� z Ss A. i� � � i� ti Difficult o d costly r ro I t t required t _ 4r . 7 er r n . / • �� \�i 11, \\ //+ d if W t I5 'NIT 0IDh batbracirf yr: ,, '4kfr7 / � �� s�� �� �� \ subject Proposed III sheet vl retaining a I1� / \�\ \ � ° i� m t l g e rm - osion d maintenance - s r r - t g C t t b oat rag � ',- ' 1^,- r. - I. •r z, '/ / i \ \\ 1� "' a .. �'�' �[ '' �� Li re fro p dpotential f `. g Stilt - _ � ` . ^ .... u congestion ana vessel nuu conflicts sited e i N -. " < ! i /y b \ �✓ ^ l P / O «, bt en hsy seafood processing llnt and marine �, � , ' ' „� ` Q � , �� �i ----.. f I float facility d door P n) t Near 4, \ � • l yg / ��iy n gt na � y f R l t p n gn a ie nl a :!fi / / -"I' �` N C development sited submerged lands -H: Y f i � . , ' � / e ^ e• hm Led h p k ' g pp rt L • y, . . '� . / V � „ / + ropaac❑ dpt parr es ' a 1 / - , • • .7 % r y a � �. / congestion and ❑ t th b d v and r. 1- .,.#X: ,.i / + \ t , ,,gi p business • f tv ,r i , ��}•�P �a\ V �i -, 4,, f3' I.. .:ha o!k 5 es 4. � \ �/ � 2 • ♦x5 ° 9 s / sz” P° yX%L�� � . - ` 705 � 1t / % t i r a t" R � ' � VA Fe 9da� 5,'ru `ufJ At t)"'.' \ R e,' 9 �/ '.--,y. i d ~+L'1.4,„1 1 \ )' .t 1 ��+ t „ { r � q A a y F 7 7 t „, oOk - • 5 -. ° ) /e 4anpoelcd Dock $[ "udui? j �V a 3V. C t - - � u " RO 1MARINE � � el � �' .+ r5 s i$ " by�tir °'X T i t d n -: ' 5 C yA . • - fr " 1 _! ..> .RV 7 ,«'., 4m:,.?`.et;',iA2 w:7,4 :.4:1: i.w .-1147 ..1,4 tir.ZI.t ._ ... a3,x7,;..Wf ,AV r3 »ro-yk , 4a FIGURE 6B - CITY TRANSIENT FLOAT CITY TRANSIENT FLOAT - ALTERNATE 6B / SHEET PILE CELL DOCK 2 Kodiak Ferry Terminal ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 8 PUBLIC FACILITIES PROPOSED KODIAK FERRY TERMINAL nd O'INCk >6P93SINRIRecon reparetReron 6- )o118A'u m 170 6- IOIFi 68 Au-2 ye 1 7 aty T en, MaLOwq KODIAK, ALASKA _ ,+, y ° I I I Cenci' Lost 816 million a " +�tA sice. ,�.'' 7j i e* # .6:t PRO :°4‘."‘ �_ d, t . ° . Y / e I L - _ a'` =\a I - L ca d location • F t,+ L x Y r > " < � Y „y a t }, • R I Y .I s' c ▪ Public 'ft .Y \ CARL LE I N I c I teal Ili c fi Lb x 5 � . T �_ . y, u � '± i5' / ' ( \� a� _� r+ Ming :+ Iberthing II P starts,' J urR � ,_ + +Gx !T�°ir* J• � f i / L �� S t : �,y. • C I L Cts v Hite +1 �rt .. b ,te K A as 'L i -- I impact .: II J ^? ����� -v ! a I II : D e i S J - . - . .. . j } / / j k S. ` kid \� poi, ^r. f coN I 1 I '"S � ;y 8 . / /f \ ; Il, 6/- � �� \ \ � �\�_ %d I I (ULIO Ci.illvdy (IC a Esc p x bat melts LI I r a d r /{y� //' I II, . �� \t 1 - --------7 F n n l +d1 I I . ,ry , Y I I ' n sited �' ` , . / v' � R/ � A /i / r ig's 1 61 L, J in :1. I tier Hoot Ergo, and close ginseng) to NC,Ii .w� v e � channel 1. ` n 4 'L / 4 °)� �✓ �AA P s :Y A rr high I nonmetal S P I land, upland � Jt I e /� <- ,. AA N • gF - I U I P e s I ttt a. -. , y r L " �, /P / sy l � .. . P t a • s Tr I u n L In I end f t � � - i A , 9 �' v ' `v ` i'J • s I pile PP as L u I Nunes i �/� ' , � � J / t.] f � � H V .— - �� �a erI .� �� ; . _ ;:. c/k • s . . �... ., ' `x .+sP mr .�q • 1 _. p 2-�. � F 4 � / )t♦ � $�d . r ' . A• ?§ A } 2"^+ F v b �' .�< ca' ' 3 \ 1‘ �� x �. n4 -.� 01 t , 't n D / V , It � ;J• .l",/1/ Yd_,c,'✓, °na A R I i P y�. • /���i ,,znder Ali c ✓ _ a C' Fco aA ,�;i '® n .'3 // K C 11'. l Nb ` A a" a k < ! I " 3.;, d /o P to �" ' rit. f still. " tt, ° s7" Y sY .' � ttr t �• i IY' ' 4 R' w .. a 4 , . 4(.. . i- # . ' +., +fi t 'Ck • .X , t r O >f- X a ' Y 4 !k fir:. -k I > ?;�- .,,x ,,,t: ..:1,,,, f ' • �' yyto '' � ,f ?v�q ¢� L .-Ht •Sy"' f � 4 < tf� • �? °.: +� .. � / � � �., y "k "dA ��'t rr � �'erN a u a ' � � . ...f r , . �.t :f�1 r� s<�, .:.a 1J l i.ue _xds, � } ;4-A.1.. � / �t4� a " h'� c FIGURE 6C - CITY TRANSIENT FLOAT CITY TRANSIENT FLOAT - ALTERNATE 6C / FILL & PILE SUPPORTED DOCK Kodiak Ferry Terminal ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 8 PUBLIC FACILITIES PROPOSE KODIA ALASKA 11 RMINAL Q IK6k 1 689!91 MFt Re con rep0fIRecon 6- IOVANAL RCON F]CS 6- IOIFgurt 6C ALT Me, t City c, TM ' Root.Olq ODIAN. ALASKA _ 1 .m / r' ' ,9' / - _ �,�. ; . gy p II le cnl I cost million awe -1C1; } F . et 1 X.. - , 4 . -- S 1 ,7w .�f L� .. , q: . ». ' ,' I2US { r I`Id e location - • Relautel■ eat) scowl act ins #' ° _ I J 7 r I CARLILE • g"; ,gp Rv a• / �. ''� ,r V • Public L I 1 I c bg t Hat r 'NC ie � �'. sl • nll 1Nothing I II I - .I Haul y, , 1�r � � � v ` ill \ i� • c c l I d 5 — , . , ) 111 - 1 ''' ' f ` \ w� / l+ :I l ill I Inc f a'� t -f� �/ \ - 1 0 Sr i V � J I R I it IId l' IIII pi i„k �."- a / V I d k / t, R �� n+I L ous T \ 4 �� "x_15 +"` 9 • n� . d d • a 41 � / //' V t �� 'S I, U II h tl II I I ♦ mJ • , ) 1 1 �� �����' a I I IT I Ih I. A li ti 1 � tr \ l �� -��-^� r I I �/II 1 �, 'yS ✓ ' .o• 1 \ ' ---------,/ q IL IP I I I i n �� 1rJ / 4 R � q . / 6• ( d I II ! - unc • - b. x J .. . • v y ° I �.6 � S Hf P \ - 5 - ;;;;" ' �y� / A n ,I I d i : D I I Near I:F 61 wl� i > tr7ij., �� dca i .'� It el I p ,. hlanJ • .4:,& 1 l.".., • �(�tl�ly+`,�.� d i N, �. A i Ilt I I g d l i. 1 • Limited tthicle pal king opportunities - business, ,� r a �/ ,�/ w (17 Ir d dpotential Upland congestion and conflict oak neaidu roadoa, and �/ / y �� � >; A \ I J . t S nu of pile cartooned It ma.quircs (y' •r S�p 'h �� � A � �G�� "` . rr * c _ tin d f il�nvnLr • ./ uy,P� �„ ld /' t 5 I' +�" '' �a11� . "� �� /:" l . x i '4 r „ , u f l :. a „....; .. .. ...... , . . TO; j / �� ' 3.� u :* sw . s" 1;7„,„ ..,.,_ . . . /� � } Y J q yi >F . t t d I + 'k� 1 1 'i\ :y a i s 7 / , d n5 . , , • ('. / e,. : q \ t w e4elfib Do%h o N r ° n r A x • ,,,, _ LS„ .ra r ,� s ,. S 4 'n ; ; x- x. ,� y 4 ^ ».e T . a " . r I, y L 4 /:°` 3u y. v , ' d „ r �{ wa",4 •Ai. ri Ss T_ 4. x 4,2..14 A ` � ' tk , 4 : S sR, a� t ,,� s . 3� t ,- m + { � ; . ' " r s A r , n 8 0 ._1„;,;,,..r.,-,,,‘_.7.-,-/,.;1/4' '" � ' �- . t 4 � ... . .. t wL t ' ' 4- y 3 ..xa' v ^. S ,'.. a' ' r " ' FIGURE 6D - CITY TRANSIENT FLOAT CITY TRANSIENT FLOAT - ALTERNATE 6D I REDUCED FILL 8 PILE SUPPORTED DOCK Kodiak Ferry Terminal ALASKA DEPARTMENTOF TRANSPORTATION 8 PUBLIC FACILITIES PROPOSED KODIgK FERRY TERMINAL OK Ml660J81W IPew report) Re 4, 6- IOIfML 4-CON 4705 6-101775/um 00 Air P/er 1 7 C.7) APATITE" F)w M Lg KODIAIe ALASKA }.g.., ' F II IcD I I c . su million 0. it. * PFr° � 0 C _ - I let 5 a /—/ ..4 Ocisting dud. site curiently used by I ustutnend PROS Thl Q rl�rn .r /� II 'I II : bl • 4 P te . " I / 1 5 Ic ,. L t .'I CI) I r �' G'Yar.�L ori_� �. y 1 70ti- iT , \ ' i \ t kr mi l. ' � // _ tit I)l - Il I I ,I,_ II t 14J - k' and / CII ' II LJ :I I \ n ff Congested III II' I0 YI ed \. b l l y y l t' r ' / C------- '' - , i . 4 ° Island naweation channel � I t V E 6 PI P - ^ ! I - ❑ 11 J t' dI t Ctf aw / d t II In I u E � t eeL A / "' / Law e Ipl IP t l dock s a vt /..�' _ '� `h ( / a r , t ' .` p 4r ,., c am s • a r L y . -mar s • '` �3. " ` } ,} S t` *� r,> r .5 r«,"f m ss ,.L yr a . 6, es," 4 r i'� ",. ? a ' 4 / / I ! / /0 .,u/o' t_d Oo e.:- l ,' r ,: F 4 ,.;la d '' }} y ,,,. 5 r , m I': •, .. ! r r 4 r"�b'P S t Pvr " ^ ! ° e., , tt • E . t - Y »y OW' �a+ - / A / de 5. ','VC ture � a4 r M o m A .�O tG /✓ 1 D 0 t0 Y K ' , � �^a� ,;"•:;,;-..- � �ry sc e I I Le / ,' �p. � ,off � zs, *' .t i y N a : ii" v ' f tr S 5 ,< 'a = # ' r 67 U f; %yL1a .3 ,a, .. C , ,Pd f n a �.:Pd �.�"..:zRrw e'i',".w'r`B4. ^ 1.,,,,,;;, ..= ks b +%',:�' ,'s'y�, . , t1a .: .. f : S _ . �. "' ,1S,. ad7:'.C� 7 rJ>h..T.�.. Yi ... .. ,.r�. z. i FIGURE 7A - PIER 1 , � PIER 1 - ALTERNATIVE 7A / NEW DOCK Kodiak Forry Terminal ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 6 PUBLIC FACILITJES PROPOSED KODIAK FERRY TERMINAL KODIPK O'INJ*I6B9JaIMFIReCOn rePan IR.." 6 - /OIF/HAL Pert" 7705 6- /01.79 )A Pe 1 . Ory , ALASKA � •7n t '. A / r • • _ .;st mx""y N.D kr' -r.:zr ". ^, LI :I.dconslvaoi co, ,8mi.. AP " T ` ' y` � el r.. r v "` y 4 . t . JJ y/p Protected R, location ty .n AO� y1 V .C. W 'F 9 ig k II ' dlyC - "�j �� �. g;414077 °= It L I� I . �`' ` \ '�� r '< F,kr %ang - _ °77 IIII II 'I IIII ly R `� / q s n II E 11 1 1 I —774, ! J �� •b / during limo All I .DI dusting do's 51 I II I .I vo<Is \ �� �� RJ k I Cite building \ 14 , .. .. N 'V. J 1I I 'I'II up to t fffaYYYYFFPP�� � I � V /) y /r� - Congested of I upland I Sited nl c[ � cb �. p N I Rid float f \ � b 'caloric' glI' J i '91 i /( 4�/ • I J p 11'I y / T Cs i &L0 I m c‘ 11 )' pun, 0,1111, ch, and mullioned potential l IL W tl �I�,1' R II I II J a “/•',. /' '1f 1 '1111 A I 1 1 na a n _n 1 f � . 1 �� I g n II ull I� • r 6 .' rt i :,, , � M' ! 4 '+'.dot • �i 5 C � � y ' �r . t f' ',.! R, :� R R sry �9 4.t '%�M -M Z Y "Yr� K +2. ` -- e t ` � t - .' r ? K '+s^ ° , d j " 44d-47r a" F 7.-.5 w' 3..C& r C !.f 4 N1.ri ! � " I +�Y • s , . ' r (s w. - '"4h. i r S ,�� Fxi.^ Yu Pi / C_ } 1 4 rov + ,o ,'•- J! •Idcii(C,] ' ° i••;■r N at''''''' ! i 4 J 3 } S. , rryy 4 444. $yt, Yi. f , 9477. ' : ._ .� +� : �' r2 w . .t... +� � � �� �,. x• F. � � +:a 1 1�-- �'���`_t�s, t See. �r.lsa « ?rv . a.e'."'. %ii � , +. ��v_x..;.. _ ''�J L F�v: FIGURE 7B - PIER 1 PIER 1 - ALTERNATIVE 7B / ADDITIONAL DOCK Kodiak Ferry Terminal ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION & PUBLIC FACILITIES PROPOSED KODIAK FERRY TERMINAL HO DIAK 9 I KNi999J91Nf1R,n,, reprtiReccn C- IOIANIL 9CCON FIGS a - tOIR9ure 79 Rx I En9 , ALASKA . + } • R : L I s. ■ n on I , —4- NOV ,/ l � \ } � / , iy- at �, R X ital r ^ o-r x a .. kr9 r ee � f' !'• r \-4- �ii'� r. a. ' a < '� t a y MA h / ` n .1. r , M . ,�P? Y � + . , :r 3Y 1 `�' � E. ' y ea k s Ir d 1, � 7/ r S y, r b. ._,•r Sl e h. A. fi� 44 _ Ir d Ir r In I mr / X J X All IL I y p L a ._ \\ "� .� •R`d 1 a rY + '. -.„...c? ` d o in r r a s E di ng cm 'into L h V R ""`` ,,�� `"�s p /e r „J ** � z CONS � •s \�\ �� a 46 4 ; S' I's -feat -IT •,;",.'' �� 1 .ti M . 14 ‘ ' yk I r '`n r^ / // .F+� r � � I i\ .4 (It ` y IC n e a 'S � / ! f 'S' ' ) r , � � � t s'. c f 1 r d vi Shied n ik \\ l�lr °lr lnn vT�s '€ l' / Vt.� n I esry -f P IC 0 r a e •y ' . E I a hit 19:/,' r j` / - a I \\ /. ? ! t '1 li b if -"�.A "� .r / a F • L r r m ne 1 �, rtsr /IoaR, r 4/, i a . Tl ulm T ! 7� / / p s e r1, q" t` r till x- x r ! hp a y� w s d- ' t= I '11:-....-,:: .vt,; i e ` ' tS 3 a ` E ' ' " x , rt t a "' qrr,�} t .•It F �� v, -b* !, , . M r t � : 1 I t / c t^ e � � 9 ,fir -A,, 1 �- - ""` r >•A a pg. I , b z ,u /' i t>L ,' s1 1 b rn r J ' .t k'r�-/ 1,1 ' 'K I iroc / i it n .? • . ..a, # +.„ . , „ , � + „_ _ , '^ ,r i f M f r ss f t >, 2-"�1t" y r y E r � d "k' /�,/ /r r ..4. Lht n „y. P t n• l ✓ ° r" 1 f ' v d v 4 'E' r ' �.6 - "t . * . , ° . Rr' c r -4 44 et e•ly i b 17 'PIE i • � r i t ' •• u� 06 "j• av 5 'K - '` ' '�3 l ` ' i R t � � L + E. � h , _ t '� x., i.e.. 4i.r .: (�• _ �.�� .. . ...� r _ � v p`+r fin.' L �> . -A�S , �3 �"Sa��w s ER R DOCK Komak FIGURE Ferry 7R Tar l eu SKto ;T:g nome.. eus... Vxu not+ Es tV. , Imss . IMxdrn , .o..w..a o-my.. RE.. ntS r— ,o >�,.