Loading...
2011-04-07 Regular Meeting Kodiak Island Borough Assembly Regular Meeting Agenda Thursday, April 7, 2011, 7:30 p.m., Assembly Chambers 1. INVOCATION 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine and non - controversial by the Assembly and will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless an Assembly member so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. *Regular Meeting Minutes of March 3 and March 17, 2011. 6. AWARDS AND PRESENTATIONS A. Child Abuse Prevention Month Proclamation B. Sexual Assault Awareness Month Proclamation C. Student of the Month for March 2011 7. CITIZENS' COMMENTS (Limited to Three Minutes per Speaker) A. Agenda Items Not Scheduled for Public Hearing and General Comments 8. COMMITTEE REPORTS 9. PUBLIC HEARING A. Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion Areas. B. Ordinance No. FY2011 -13 Rezoning a Portion of Tract B -1A, U.S. Survey 4947 (Near Island) From C- Conservation To PL- Public Use Zone. 10. BOROUGH MANAGER'S REPORT 11. MESSAGES FROM THE BOROUGH MAYOR 12. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 13. NEW BUSINESS A. Contracts 1. Contract No. FY2011 -28 Kodiak High School Old Pool Reclamation Project. Meeting broadcast live over radio station KMXT 100.1 FM and Cablevision station 12. Citizens' Comments and Public Hearing Numbers: Local 486 -3231. Page 1 of 2 B. Resolutions 1. Resolution No. FY2011 -24 Supporting a Bill to End Requirements That Employers Who Terminate Some or All Participation in the Public Employees Retirement System of Alaska Pay Termination Costs and Making the Changes Retroactive. C. Ordinances for Introduction 1. Ordinance No. FY2011 -14 Rezoning Lot G -1, U.S. Survey 3218, From B- Business To R3- Multifamily Residential, and Lots D -2, H -1, H -2 and G -2, U.S. Survey 3218, From RR1 -Rural Residential One To R3- Multifamily Residential. D. Other Items 1. Confirmation of the Mayoral Appointment to the Architectural /Engineering Review Board. 2. Confirmation of the Assembly Appointments to the Kodiak Workforce Regional Advisory Council. 3. *Declaring a Seat on the Solid Waste Advisory Board Vacant. 14. CITIZENS' COMMENTS (Limited to Three Minutes per Speaker) 15. ASSEMBLY MEMBERS' COMMENTS 16. ADJOURNMENT 17. INFORMATIONAL MATERIALS (No Action Required) A. Minutes of Other Meetings 1. Fire Protection Area No. 1 Board Regular Meetings of January 18, 2011, and February 15, 2011. 2. Kodiak Workforce Regional Advisory Council Regular Meeting of February 16, 2011. 3. Mission Lake Tidegate Service Area Board Regular Meeting of March 10, 2011. 4. Monashka Bay Road Service Area Board Regular Meeting of March 3, 2011. 5. Parks and Recreation Committee Regular Meetings of February 22, 2011, and March 8, 2011. 6. Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting of February 16, 2011. 7. Solid Waste Advisory Board Regular Meeting of February 2, 2011. B. Reports 1. Kodiak Island Borough December 2010 Financial Report. 2. Kodiak Island Borough School District Regular Meeting Summary of March 21, 2011. Meeting broadcast live over radio station KMXT 100.1 FM and Cablevision station 12. Citizens' Comments and Public Hearing Numbers: Local 486 -3231. Page 2 of 2 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH Assembly Regular Meeting March 3, 2011 A regular meeting of the Kodiak Island Borough Assembly was held on Thursday, March 3, 2011, in the Assembly Chambers of the Kodiak Island Borough Building, 710 Mill Bay Road. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. The invocation was given by Captain John Quinn of the Salvation Army. Mayor Selby led the Pledge of Allegiance. Present were Mayor Jerome Selby, Assembly members Carol Austerman, Jerrol Friend, Judy Fulp, Sue Jeffrey, Dave Kaplan, Chris Lynch, and Louise Stutes. Staff members present were Manager Rick Gifford, Finance Director Karl Short, Clerk Nova Javier, and Assistant Clerk Jessica Kilborn. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA JEFFREY moved to approve the agenda and consent agenda. JEFFREY moved to amend the agenda by removing Item 6.B Student of the Month Award Presentation. The student of the month recipient notified the Clerk's office of a conflict in schedules. The award presentation was moved to the March 17, 2011, regular meeting agenda. ROLL CALL VOTE ON MOTION TO AMEND THE AGENDA CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY: Austerman, Friend, Fulp, Jeffrey, Kaplan, Lynch, and Stutes. ROLL CALL VOTE ON MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY: Friend, Fulp, Jeffrey, Kaplan, Lynch, Stutes, and Austerman. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Regular Meeting Minutes of January 20 and February 3, 2011, were approved under the consent agenda. AWARDS AND PRESENTATIONS Mayor Selby proclaimed the Month of March 2011 as National Women's History Month. Manager Gifford presented the Employee of the Year Award to Eddie Arellano, Maintenance Mechanic in the Engineering and Facilities Department. CITIZENS' COMMENTS David Blacketer provided a quarterly report for the Senior Citizens of Kodiak, Inc. Ken Reinke spoke on Women's History Month. Sam Mutch spoke against the proposed Joint Fisheries Representative. Kodiak Island Borough Assembly Minutes March 3, 2011 Page 1 COMMITTEE REPORTS Assembly member Friend reported on the efforts of the Architectural /Engineering Review Board to choose a firm for the architectural design for the long -term care facility. Assembly member Jeffrey reported on the Kodiak Fisheries Advisory Committee meeting held on February 24, 2011; KFAC met to work on restructuring the committee. The North Pacific Fishery Management Council meeting will be held in Nome in June. Assembly member Kaplan reported on the School Board Budget Committee. The FY12 budget was being reviewed and would be presented to the Assembly by April 30. PUBLIC HEARING None. BOROUGH MANAGER'S REPORT Manager Gifford reported on the following: • Jensen Yorba Lott would be in Kodiak the week of March 8 to hold the KHS Design Concept Kickoff Meetings. • Code revision consultants would meet in Kodiak, March 10 and 11. • Assessment notices were mailed out on Monday, February 28. Adjustments could be made by calling the Borough Assessor. • Reported on the bonds sold on March 1. $8 million were sold and would be used for the KHS Renovation Project. • Would be attending the Joint Legislative Reception in Juneau, March 8 -10. Manager Gifford answered questions from Assembly member Jeffrey regarding the upcoming land sale and reviewed discussions that took place at the work session of February 24. Manager Gifford noted that the goal was to hold the sale in late spring or early summer. There were three lots platted for sale, one in the Monashka Bay area and two in the Bells Flats area. Further information would be provided to the Assembly once the parcels had gone through the Planning and Zoning Commission process. It was noted that sale conditions would be addressed in an ordinance. MESSAGES FROM THE BOROUGH MAYOR Mayor Selby reported on the Fishery Industrial Technology Center (FITC) Committee meeting. Reassurance was given at the meeting that the University of Alaska fully intended to keep FITC in Kodiak with future plans for the community. The University was committed to expanding and utilizing FITC. Mayor Selby announced that the KHS Citizens Advisory Committee would meet the week of March 8; the names of the individuals appointed to serve on the committee were announced. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None. Kodiak Island Borough Assembly Minutes March 3, 2011 Page 2 NEW BUSINESS Contracts None. Resolutions 1. Resolution No. FY2011 -19 Supporting the Alaska Municipal League's Resolution to Amend the Alaska Coastal Management Program and Extend the Program Sunset Date. This item was approved under the consent agenda. The Alaska Coastal Management Program (ACMP) would sunset on June 1, 2011. This program had served the Borough well in the past when oil and gas exploration was occurring off Kodiak's shore. Under the plan, the local governments' "consistency provision" provided a mechanism where fishermen and the oil companies were able to sit down and develop a plan to allow exploration without impacting fishing seasons and fishing gear. The plan was also cited when a floating incinerator was contemplated to be located in Viekoda Bay to incinerate absorbent materials that were collected as part of the massive cleanup effort during the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill. The program played a lesser role under the Murkowski administration. The program was centralized and a number of important components (enforceable policies and consistency review) were taken away from local governments and moved to the Governor's office and the Department of Natural Resources. Also, large scaled projects or further exploration off the coast had not occurred, but exploration would again occur and on -shore support facilities would be needed. With the suggested amendments, the ACMP would again guarantee Kodiak a key seat at the table in any major development and a key voice when coordinating comments on projects with state and federal government agencies. This resolution extended the sunset date of the program, restructured the program to return authority to local government, recreated a coastal policy board, and returned authority to resource agencies in an effort to promote responsible development while protecting Kodiak's coastal resources. 2. Resolution No. FY2011 -20 Adopting a 2011 Kodiak Island Borough Communities State Legislative Capital Improvement Projects Priority List. KAPLAN moved to adopt Resolution No. FY2011 -20. As a regional government, the Kodiak Island Borough represented the communities of the Kodiak Island Archipelago. These communities included the City of Kodiak, City of Akhiok, City of Larsen Bay, City of Old Harbor, City of Ouzinkie, City of Port Lions, and the community of Karluk. In these communities there were improvements and infrastructure that included docks, airports, community utilities, and facilities. Project needs were indentified and prioritized by each community and forwarded to the Kodiak Island Borough by resolution for inclusion into a 2011 State Legislative Capital Improvement Projects Priority List to be sent to the governor and state legislative delegation. Kodiak Island Borough Assembly Minutes March 3, 2011 Page 3 ROLL CALL VOTE ON MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY: Fulp, Jeffrey, Kaplan, Lynch, Stutes, Austerman, and Friend. 3. Resolution No. FY2011 -21 Requesting the Alaska State Legislature Fully Fund the Energy Rebate Program. JEFFREY moved to adopt Resolution No. FY2011 -21. To help combat the escalating energy costs, the Alaska Legislature created the Home Energy Rebate program dedicated to making Alaska's homes more energy efficient. The Rebate program helped Alaska residents, especially those in rural areas, save money through lower fuel bills by reducing the need to depend upon foreign oil to generate electricity, heat homes, and fuel vehicles, and also put money back into the local and statewide economies by creating job opportunities. Rural Alaska residents, already paying some of the highest energy bills in the nation, would benefit in many ways from their own allocated funding stream, separate from that of the road system residents. Assembly member Friend asked to be excused from the vote due to his involvement as an energy rater in Kodiak. Mayor Selby excused Assembly member Friend from voting. ROLL CALL VOTE ON MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY: Jeffrey, Kaplan, Lynch, Stutes, Austerman, and Fulp. 4. Resolution No. FY2011 -22 Supporting the Implementation of Lake Fertilization of Karluk, Frazer, and Spiridon Lakes by the Kodiak Regional Aquaculture Association as a Salmon Rehabilitation and Enhancement Method. KAPLAN moved to adopt Resolution No. FY2011 -22. This resolution was requested by the Kodiak Regional Aquaculture Association. A number of Kodiak Archipelago lakes which had historically been major sockeye salmon producers were currently in a depressed state of production among those systems. The depressed sockeye production of these lakes had a devastating effect on Kodiak's west side and south end salmon fisheries and a negative impact on the Borough economy and the five villages in the area. Karluk, Frazer, and Spiridon lakes were identified as having strong potential for substantially increased sockeye salmon production if lake fertilization projects were initiated. Through the Kodiak Regional Aquaculture Association (KRAA), Kodiak Management Area salmon fishermen committed significant funding to lake fertilization to restore these fisheries. Lake fertilization projects contributed to sustainable fisheries and economic development that would directly benefit Kodiak sport, subsistence, and commercial fishermen, seafood processors, and the Borough government, which received raw fish tax revenues Kodiak Island Borough Assembly Minutes March 3, 2011 Page 4 Local government support was a key factor in the State Legislature's consideration of support and potential funding for local projects and the Borough had a history of providing support and funding for fisheries development, and specifically for fertilization of Karluk and Frazer lakes. KRAA Operations Manager Gary Byrne provided background information regarding the lake enrichment project. Mayor Selby reported that the resolution had been provided to the Alaska Department of Fish and Game for review and approval. ROLL CALL VOTE ON MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY: Kaplan, Lynch, Stutes, Austerman, Friend, Fulp, and Jeffrey. Ordinances for Introduction 1. Ordinance No. FY2011 -12 Amending Title 3 Revenue and Finance Chapter 3.35 Real Property Tax Section 3.35.050 Board of Equalization. JEFFREY moved to adopt Ordinance No. FY2011 -12 in first reading to advance to public hearing at the next regular meeting of the Assembly. KIBC Section 3.35.050 had not been updated since 1978 except for a minor revision in 1998 which dealt with member appointments. It was in the best interests of the Borough to amend this section to provide clear and better guidance for appellants regarding the Board of Equalization (BOE) appeals. The proposed changes also set better standards and established better processes for the BOE hearings. The proposed changes were derived from current practices being used by other municipalities in the State. The BOE convened on Tuesday, February 15, 2011, and reviewed and revised the initial draft prepared by staff. The ordinance was approved by BOE and was reviewed by the Borough Attorney for legal compliance. ROLL CALL VOTE ON MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY: Lynch, Stutes, Austerman, Friend, Fulp, Jeffrey, and Kaplan. Other Items 1. Declaring a Seat on the Architectural /Engineering Review Board Vacant. This item was approved under the consent agenda. On February 1, 2011, Mr. Peter Malley submitted a notice of resignation from the Architectural /Engineering Review Board (ARB). The Assembly accepted, with regret, the resignation of Mr. Malley from the ARB for a term to expire December 2011, and directed the Borough Clerk to advertise the vacancy per Borough Code. 2. Confirmation of the Assembly Appointment to the Monashka Bay Road Service Area Board. STUTES moved to confirm the Assembly appointment of Mr. Thomas Lance to a vacant seat on the Monashka Bay Road Service Area Board for a term to expire October 2013. Kodiak Island Borough Assembly Minutes March 3, 2011 Page 5 Three of the five seats on the Monashka Bay Road Service Area Board (MBSA) were vacant. On February 24, 2011, an application was received from Mr. Thomas Lance for the vacant seat fora term to expire 2013. Mr. Lance attended the MBSA work session of February 10, 2011, and indicated his desire to serve on the board and his intention was included in the work session notes. MBSA Chairperson Darlene Turner was contacted and provided Mr. Lance's application and it was her recommendation to forward the application to the Assembly for appointment to the board, thus fulfilling the requirements of KIBC 4.15.040. ROLL CALL VOTE ON MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY: Stutes, Austerman, Friend, Fulp, Jeffrey, Kaplan, and Lynch. CITIZENS' COMMENTS Chris Berns and Rick Berns thanked the Assembly for its support on Resolution No. FY2011 -22. Duncan Fields thanked Assembly member Jeffrey for reporting on the KFAC, spoke in support of Resolution No. FY2011 -22, and spoke in support of a joint fisheries representative. Iver Malutin spoke on past Borough land acquisitions and on past Karluk lake enrichment efforts. ASSEMBLY MEMBER COMMENTS Assembly members congratulated Eddie Arellano, recipient of the Employee of Year award and the 2010 Employee of the Quarter award recipients, and thanked Sonia Sorto for accepting the National Women's History Month proclamation on behalf of the Kodiak Women's Resource and Crisis Center. Assembly member Stutes expressed condolences to the family of Mr. Tom Quick. She urged the community to utilize the landfill facilities, encouraged public comments during the upcoming public hearing for the roll cart expansion areas, and urged the Assembly to utilize the Solid Waste Advisory Board when considering transfer stations. Assembly member Jeffrey discussed the benefits of the landfill, asked the Assembly to consider moving the upcoming public hearing on the roll cart expansion areas to the April 7 regular meeting to accommodate those who would be traveling for spring break, spoke on upcoming local events to support efforts on behalf of the women of the Congo, and thanked GC] for broadcasting the assembly meetings. Assembly member Fulp encouraged the public to consider that funding for the Baranof Park Improvements and Kodiak High School Renovation projects would affect the entire community since these two locations were used community -wide for various events throughout the year. Assembly member Austerman thanked Gary Byrne for the lake enrichment project presentation provided at the February 24 work session. Kodiak Island Borough Assembly Minutes March 3, 2011 Page 6 Announcements Mayor Selby announced that he and members of the Assembly would be traveling to Juneau to attend the Joint Legislative Reception on Wednesday, March 9, 2011. The Assembly work session scheduled for Thursday, March 10, 2011, was rescheduled to Tuesday, March 15, 2011, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Conference Room and the next regular meeting of the Assembly was scheduled on Thursday, March 17, 2011. ADJOURNMENT JEFFREY moved to adjourn the meeting. ROLL CALL VOTE ON MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY: Austerman, Friend, Fulp, Jeffrey, Kaplan, Lynch, and Stutes. The meeting was adjourned at 8:53 p.m. KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ATTEST: Jerome M. Selby, Mayor Nova M. Javier, MMC, Borough Clerk Approved: Kodiak Island Borough Assembly Minutes March 3, 2011 Page 7 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH Assembly Regular Meeting March 17, 2011 A regular meeting of the Kodiak Island Borough Assembly was held on Thursday, March 17, 2011, in the Assembly Chambers of the Kodiak Island Borough Building, 710 Mill Bay Road. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. The invocation was given by Sergeant Major Dave Blacketer of the Salvation Army. Mayor Selby led the Pledge of Allegiance. Present were Mayor Jerome Selby, Assembly members Carol Austerman, Jerrol Friend, Judy Fulp, Sue Jeffrey, Dave Kaplan, Chris Lynch, and Louise Stutes. Staff members present were Manager Rick Gifford, Assessor Bill Roberts, Clerk Nova Javier, and Assistant Clerk Jessica Kilborn. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA FRIEND moved to approve the agenda and consent agenda. VOICE VOTE ON MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. APPROVAL OF MINUTES None. AWARDS AND PRESENTATIONS Mayor Selby presented the Kodiak Beautification Awards for a Business to Fir Terrace Apartments and a Residence to Robin and Jessica Gardner. Mayor Selby presented the Student of the Month award for February 2011 to Hazel Mae Delos Santos, a senior at the Kodiak High School. CITIZENS' COMMENTS Sandra West provided an update on the status of the proposed bike path along Rezanof Drive. Terry Haines requested that discussion on the joint fisheries representative be placed on the next Assembly work session agenda and urged future involvement by the Assembly on fisheries issues. COMMITTEE REPORTS Assembly member Stutes reported on the Koniag /Kodiak Area Native Association (KANA) roundtable event of March 11, 2011. Assembly member Jeffrey reported that the Kodiak Fisheries Advisory Committee was in need of citizens to fill the vacant Community at Large and Salmon /Herring Vessels seats. Kodiak Island Borough Assembly Minutes March 17, 2011 Page 1 Assembly members Friend and Fulp reported on the KHS Project Citizens' Advisory Committee meetings of March 8 and 15. The next meeting was scheduled on March 31 and public involvement was encouraged. Citizens were invited to view the website at www .kodiakhsbuildingproject.com. PUBLIC HEARING A. Ordinance No. FY2011 -12 Amending Title 3 Revenue and Finance Chapter 3.35 Real Property Tax Section 3.35.050 Board of Equalization. JEFFREY moved to adopt Ordinance No. FY2011 -12. KIBC Section 3.35.050 had not been updated since 1978 except for a minor revision in 1998 which dealt with member appointments. It was in the best interest of the Borough to amend this section to provide clear and better guidance for appellants regarding the Board of Equalization (BOE) appeals. The proposed changes also set better standards and established better processes for the BOE hearings. The proposed changes were derived from current practices being used by other municipalities in the State. The BOE convened on Tuesday, February 15, 2011, and reviewed and revised the initial draft prepared by staff. The ordinance was approved by BOE and was reviewed by the Borough Attorney for legal compliance. Mayor Selby opened the public hearing. Hearing and seeing none, Mayor Selby closed the public hearing. ROLL CALL VOTE ON MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY: Austerman, Friend, Fulp, Jeffrey, Kaplan, Lynch, and Stutes. BOROUGH MANAGER'S REPORT Manager Gifford reported on the following: • The state continued to monitor the Japanese reactor situation; radiation of sufficient quantities was not expected in Alaska. • Code revision workshops were held the week of March 7. The first draft of the code revisions would be available soon. The public was invited to view the progress on the Borough website at www.kodiakak.us /coderevision and to attend the public meetings. • Public hearing forms for the roll cart proposed expansion areas were mailed out to residents the week of March 15. The public hearing was scheduled for Thursday, April 7. • 2010 census numbers were available. It was noted that population in the Borough had declined since the last census. • A letter of support for the appointment of Mr. Mel Morris to the Board of Fish was provided and consensus was provided to proceed with the letter. Assembly member Jeffrey asked the Manager to provide an update on the process for hiring the joint fisheries representative. Manager Gifford reported that the sub - committee had met and was putting together an Request for Proposal (RFP). The RFP was scheduled to be presented to the City Council and Assembly prior to being made available to the public. Kodiak Island Borough Assembly Minutes March 17, 2011 Page 2 Assembly member Stutes asked for an update on the transfer station sites. Manager Gifford responded that the sites were being reviewed and would be brought forward to the Assembly for approval. MESSAGES FROM THE BOROUGH MAYOR Mayor Selby reported on the Joint Legislative Reception in Juneau on March 9, and provided a report on the meetings that the Assembly had participated in while in Juneau. Mayor Selby expressed condolences to the family of Mr. Ed Opheim, Sr. for their loss. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None. NEW BUSINESS Contracts 1. Contract No. FY2011 -25 Kodiak Middle School Gym Roof Seismic Upgrades. JEFFREY moved to authorize the manager to execute Contract No. FY2011 -25 with Alutiiq International Solutions, LLC. of Anchorage, Alaska for the Kodiak Middle School Gym Roof Seismic Upgrades Project in an amount not to exceed $334,158. This contract was for the Kodiak Middle School Gym Roof Seismic Upgrades Project as depicted in the construction documents prepared by Jensen Yorba Lott, Inc. The construction documents, bid documents and associated addenda were available for review. Bids were received in response to the Borough's invitation to bid dated January 3, 2011. Of the thirteen bidders, Alutiiq International Solutions, LLC. was the lowest bidder for the project. A bid tabulation was provided. ROLL CALL VOTE ON MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY: Friend, Fulp, Jeffrey, Kaplan, Lynch, Stutes, and Austerman. Resolutions 1. Resolution No. FY2011 -23 Supporting the 2011 Legislative Priorities of the Alaska Commission on Aging. This item was approved under the consent agenda. This resolution was requested by Senior Citizens of Kodiak, Inc. Executive Director Pat Branson. On February 23, 2011, the Senior Citizens of Kodiak, Inc. Board of Directors met and reviewed the 2011 Legislative Priorities of the Alaska Commission on Aging. The board requested that the Assembly send a resolution of support for these priorities to the Legislative Delegation. Kodiak Island Borough Assembly Minutes March 17, 2011 Page 3 Ordinances for Introduction 1. Ordinance No. FY2011 -13 Rezoning a Portion of Tract B -1A, U.S. Survey 4947 (Near Island) From C- Conservation To PL- Public Use Zone. FRIEND moved to adopt Ordinance No. FY2011 -13 in first reading to advance to public hearing at the next regular meeting of the Assembly. The Borough combined an existing lot on Near Island with additional land that was acquired from the City of Kodiak. This new lot would house the existing Kodiak Fisheries Research Center and scientist housing. The additional land would also house the proposed Alaska Department of Fish and Game facility. The land acquired from the City was zoned C- Conservation. The parcel that it was incorporated into was zoned PL- Public Use Lands. The desire was to have the entire lot be zoned PL- Public Use Lands which allowed offices for local, state, and federal governments. After holding a public meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously approved recommendation to the Assembly that the entire parcel be rezoned from C- Conservation to PL— Public Use Lands. ROLL CALL VOTE ON MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY: Fulp, Jeffrey, Kaplan, Lynch, Stutes, Austerman, and Friend. Other Items 1. State of Alaska Alcoholic Beverage Control Board Request for Renewal of Liquor License Application for The Rendezvous, Lic. #2639 (Beverage Dispensary) (Applicant: Toni Munsey and Val Flinders). STUTES moved to voice protest to the State of Alaska Alcoholic Beverage Control Board for the renewal application for The Rendezvous, Lic. #2639 (Beverage Dispensary) (Applicants: Toni Munsey and Val Flinders) based on unpaid taxes. After the Clerk's office routine investigation following KIBC 5.01.020 License renewal procedure it was recommended that the Borough should voice protest based on unpaid taxes. ROLL CALL VOTE ON MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY: Jeffrey, Kaplan, Lynch, Stutes, Austerman, Friend, and Fulp. 2. Confirmation of the Mayoral Appointment to the Prince William Sound Regional Citizens' Advisory Council (PWSRCAC). JEFFREY moved to confirm the mayoral appointment of Mr. Iver Malutin for a two -year term on the Prince William Sound Regional Citizens' Advisory Council. Mr. Iver Malutin's term on the Prince William Sound Regional Citizens' Advisory Council (PWSRCAC) expired May 2011. A courtesy letter was sent out to the different villages soliciting recommendations for appointment and none were received. Mr. Malutin indicated to the Clerk's office that he was interested in continuing to serve on the board for a two -year term. Kodiak Island Borough Assembly Minutes March 17, 2011 Page 4 ROLL CALL VOTE ON MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY: Kaplan, Lynch, Stutes, Austerman, Friend, Fulp, and Jeffrey. CITIZENS' COMMENTS None. ASSEMBLY MEMBER COMMENTS Assembly members congratulated the Student of the Month and Beautification Award recipients. Assembly members Jeffrey and Lynch commended Sandra West for her efforts on the bike trail project. Assembly members Jeffrey and Stutes expressed their enjoyment in participation on the Koniag /KANA roundtable event and were interested in pursuing semiannual roundtable discussions between the two agencies and the Assembly. Assembly member Friend encouraged the public to visit the high school renovation project website at www .kodiakhsbuildingproject.com. Assembly member Jeffrey congratulated the Port Lions School girls basketball team and the Kodiak High School boys basketball team on their accomplishments. She extended her condolences to the Opheim family. Assembly member Fulp thanked the Borough and Spenard Builders Supply for sponsoring the beautification awards. She encouraged public participation at the upcoming KHS Project Citizens' Advisory Committee meetings and the review of the design conceptions. Announcements Mayor Selby announced the Borough offices would be closed Monday, March 28, 2011, in observance of Seward's Day. The next Assembly work session would be held on Thursday, March 31, 2011, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Conference Room and the next regular meeting of the Assembly was scheduled on Thursday, April 7, 2011. ADJOURNMENT JEFFREY moved to adjourn the meeting. ROLL CALL VOTE ON MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY: Lynch, Stutes, Austerman, Friend, Fulp, Jeffrey, and Kaplan. The meeting was adjourned at 8:25 p.m. Kodiak Island Borough Assembly Minutes March 17, 2011 Page 5 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ATTEST: Jerome M. Selby, Mayor Nova M. Javier, MMC, Borough Clerk Approved: Kodiak Island Borough Assembly Minutes March 17, 2011 Page 6 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH AGENDA STATEMENT APRIL 7, 2011 REGULAR MEETING ITEM NO: 9.A TITLE: Direction to Proceed with the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion Areas. SUMMARY: At the work session of February 24, 2011, the Assembly requested to hold a public hearing to hear comments from the residents affected by the proposed expansion areas for roll cart services related to the Solid Waste Collection Contract. On March 14, 2011, public hearing forms and informational material were mailed to the residents within the areas. Attached are the responses received by the Clerk's office. FISCAL NOTES: Account No.: Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Required: APPROVAL FOR AGENDA: / J' rad RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to direct the Manager to proceed with the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion Areas. Form Ver. 06/30/2009 The Borough has been making progress toward the goals outlined in the Kodiak Island Borough Strategic Plan regarding responsible collection and disposal of solid waste and extending the life of the landfill while reducing long -term costs to customers. Roll -cart service within the City provides an efficient, clean, convenient, and low -cost alternative to the previous system. Customers served by the roll -carts within the City of Kodiak are generally pleased with the convenience and have adjusted quickly to the changeaThe success of this first step provides confidence that we are ready to expand this service to rinclude more residential customers, and yP remove the messy expensive residential dumpsters Yu, �*L�c The Borough proposes to expand this service' to the residential customers identified in the green and blue shaded neigh on the enclosed,map. -Eath resident within the proposed service area will choose the appropriate cart size (provided at no charge) for their needs and receive weekly pick -up service. Rate changes: • Current dumpster rate $40.31 per month $495.72 per year • New 32 gallon cart rate $28.90 per month $346.80 per year • New 64 gallon cart rate $34.09 per month $409.08 per year • New 96 gallon cart rate $38.31 per month $459.72 per year How does this system reduce long -term costs to customers? • Operational efficiencies in garbage collection with carts cost less than collection by dumpsters. • Eliminating residential dumpsters promotes individual responsibility and reduces opportunities for abuse i.e. commercial)construction waste in residential containers. • Variable rates provide an incentive to recycle therefore reducing volumes placed in the landfill. How does this system lengthen the life of the landfill? • It advances KIB to an efficient automated collection system that is easily adapted to convenient road -side collection of recyclables in the near future. • Individual cart based recycling systems yield more material per household than regional bin based collection systems. DIRECTIONS FOR EXPRESSING YOUR OPINION EITHER IN SUPPORT OR IN OPPOSITION TO THE EXPANSION ARE LOCATED ON THE BACK OF THE ATTACHED MAP. PUBLIC HEARING FORM The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly will hold a public hearing on Thursday, April 7, 2011, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers to hear comments on: Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion Areas. ❑ This written argument is in support of the expansion area. ❑ This written argument is in opposition of the expansion area. Name: Residence Address: Mailing Address: Comments: Written argument supporting or opposing the public hearing may be submitted by email to njavierkodiakak.us, faxed to 907- 486 -9391, mailed or hand delivered to the Borough Clerk's Office, 710 Mill Bay Road, Room 101, Kodiak, AK 99615 prior to 5 p.m. on Thursday, April 7, 2011. All written comments submitted on this hearing shall become part of the public hearing record. KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH f '3,z f ( , , OFFICE of the MANAGER °' MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Mayor and Assembly of the Kodiak Island Borough FROM: Rick Gifford, Borough Manager DATE: February 22, 2011 SUBJECT: Proposal for Solid Waste Expansion of Cart Services The current Solid Waste Collection Contract with Alaska Waste provides for residential roll cart services within the City of Kodiak. The Contract, Section 4 -4.01 b. (1) Residential states: "Beginning on the Collection Commencement Date, Contractor will Collect all Refuse discarded in Carts at residential Premises located within the City of Kodiak (or other area designated by KIB in Notice to Contractor) weekly, on the same Regularly Scheduled Collection Day." Other areas can be designated by KIB in a Notice to Contractor. The discussions during the contract approval process discussed other possible areas that are densely populated and could be easily accessible by roll carts. Those other areas were not included at the start of the Alaska Waste Contract as we were running out of time (up against the summer months) for Alaska Waste to implement the new system in a timely and efficient manner. The Solid Waste Management Plan calls for a Solid Waste System that is a "Pay -As- You - Throw" system. Direction given to the KIB administration upon approval of the Alaska Waste Contract and during discussion concerning possible transfer sites was to continue working towards the "Pay- As -You- Throw" system. The roll carts help the Borough move closer towards its goal of a "Pay - As- You - Throw" system and helps move towards a more comprehensive recycling system. In addition, the roll cart system has proven to be more efficient and cost effective for both the Contractor and the customer. The Contractor is better able to predict the amount of solid waste to be disposed and therefore, schedule routes and workers in a more productive manner and control costs. This efficiency relates to lower costs to the roll cart customer and the roll cart customer knows when his garbage will be picked up and the customer can adjust their disposal of garbage accordingly. Alaska Waste and the Borough Administration would like to propose additional areas just north of the City that are densely populated to be added to the Alaska Waste roll cart services. Included with this memo is a map indicating the proposed areas to receive roll cart services. The additional areas would create one additional route for Alaska Waste and make their collection services more efficient. The proposed areas would provide roll cart services to an additional 656 customers. It would eliminate 13 dumpster sites and 19 dumpsters along with the spillage that goes along with the dumpsters. Roll cart services within the City of Kodiak have proved to be successful. Customers know how to get rid of their trash and at least 90% of the customers place their roll carts out on the day of service. Alaska Waste is able to resolve problems with service immediately. Overflowing containers can be upgraded to a larger size roll cart, container issues are done with tags on the container by the driver and a call from dispatch. If the customer misses their service, Alaska Waste provides a 1 time courtesy pick up and on windy days, the driver attempts to place the container as far from road as possible. Alaska Waste has also been able to resolve issues with placement of roll carts with customers who have limited and /or difficult places with which to place the roll cart. Alaska Waste continues to get customer requests for roll cart services outside of the existing service area. Most people who move to Kodiak are already familiar with the roll cart service and know what to expect. In addition, the customer can choose the size of roll cart needed, thus only paying for the amount of garbage they dispose of instead of what others dispose of. Customers with additional garbage on an occasional basis or with bulky items can continue to contact Alaska Waste for pick up and /or deliver to the landfill themselves. Knowing what areas will eventually receive roll cart services will also make it easier to determine the number of sites and the size of transfer sites needed. Alaska Waste and KIB staff will be available at the Assembly's work session to discuss the above proposal and answer questions. The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly will hold a public hearing on Thursday. April 7, 2011, at 7:30 p.m. in the : Borough Assembly Chambers to hear comments on: Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Service E*pansion Areas. Anyone in support or opposition of the proposed expansion is encourage to participate. • P i a L + . }: ham` *, ! a' N ' I� rI-' ii 1 - i y J f r,�. :I' I "�; R i . ..i� ;. 1B 2 ,? -- Tc_____i' • AO _ . . A 44.4", O '., i s Pi . ; .. _ :,‘,\I-1 , _ V . 1A _ aiii I 1 _ ie. , . , e Legend � . ' ..�/ Proposod AroalA - Proposed Arse 18 Alaska Waste Proposed Rol Cart Service Expansion Areas K..a=Brru y.G, This rap is provi dad fa planning norpnots and Proposed Areal >•� D an . sm f r. 698 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICES WERE SENT OUT ON MONDAY, MARCH 14, 2011. BELOW ARE THE RESPONSES RECEIVED BY THE CLERK'S OFFICE. PROPOSED EXPANSION AREA 1A RESIDENTS' NAME RESIDENTS' ST ADDRESS RESPONSE BARNARD, BRENDA & DAVID 438 CURLEW WAY OPPOSED BARTON, ROBERT & MYRNA 3573A SITKINAK DRIVE OPPOSED COYLE, FRED 3409 TUGIDAK COURT OPPOSED DIERICH- ERWIN, LIANE 3570 TUGIDAK COURT OPPOSED FINLAY, DALE 2426 SPRUCE CAPE ROAD OPPOSED FLERCHINGER, BRITTA 2949 SPRUCE CAPE ROAD, #9 OPPOSED KNOWLES, KEN 3710 SHARATIN ROAD OPPOSED LINDSEY, LOUIS 3150 SPRUCE CAPE ROAD OPPOSED MATHIS, ROBERT, JR. 3646 SHARATIN ROAD OPPOSED MILES, FRANK 3618 SHARATIN ROAD OPPOSED ROBERSON, LEONARD 3130 SPRUCE CAPE ROAD OPPOSED SVINDLAND, GUNNULF 3504 HARLEQUIN COURT OPPOSED THOMSEN, STEVE 498 SHEARWATER DRIVE OPPOSED (CONDITIONALLY) WAGNER, ROGER 2987 SPRUCE CAPE ROAD OPPOSED WIEST, REBECCA 3560 TUGIDAK COURT OPPOSED WOODWARD. WALTER & VICTORIA 2408 SPRUCE CAPE ROAD OPPOSED DRASKOVICH, MARGARET 3511 TUGIDAK COURT SUPPORT LLEDO, LILIA 3462 PUFFIN DRIVE SUPPORT RANDOLPH, MARTHA 3218 KATMAI DRIVE SUPPORT REPOSA, SUZANNE & LARSEN, JOHN 3231 KATMAI DRIVE SUPPORT REUTER, MIKE & LISA 3240 KATMAI DRIVE SUPPORT SMITH, STEVEN 2919 SPRUCE CAPE ROAD SUPPORT WEST, RED & SANDRA 2474 SPRUCE CAPE ROAD SUPPORT ZULLICK, RUSSELL & DEBORAH 331 TEAL WAY SUPPORT l'ORTER, SHARON 3247 KATMAI DRIVE NEUTRAL PROPOSED EXPANSION AREA 1B KOZUB, DONNA 2095 SELIEF LANE OPPOSED LONGGOOD, PETER & MELISSA 2133 SELIEF LANE OPPOSED ARIN, SUSANA & PETER 2235 BEAVER LAKE DRIVE SUPPORT ROBERTS, MARGARET 1994 SELIEF LANE SUPPORT SERAME, LANIE 2265 BEAVER LAKE DRIVE SUPPORT PROPOSED EXPANSION AREA 2 ARNDT, JOHN 3017 RAVEN CIRCLE OPPOSED BUNTING, DOUG 3100 PTARMAGIN PASS OPPOSED BOURAY, MICHAEL 3291 BALIKA LANE OPPOSED DILLON, MARCELLA 3438 EIDER STREET OPPOSED EMERSON, JAMES 2346 PTARMAGIN PASS OPPOSED HELENHOUSE, NENITA 378 NEVA WAY OPPOSED JOHNSON, CRAIG 297 SHAHAFKA WAY OPPOSED OLSON, CRAIG 725 LILLY DRIVE OPPOSED OSTLUND, DAVE 3430 ED'S WAY OPPOSED SEATON, LESLIE 2920 COVE DRIVE OPPOSED SMITH, SHEILA 3388 EIDER STREET OPPOSED TRACY, DONN 389 NEVA WAY OPPOSED (CONDITIONALLY) CHATSKI, KELSEY 2939 COVE DRIVE, #B SUPPORT MCLAUGHLIN, BROOKE & KARL 366 NEVA WAY SUPPORT SHERMAN, MIKE & NICOLE 3340 MELNITSA LANE SUPPORT RESPONSES RECEIVED FROM RESIDENTS OUTSIDE THE PROPOSED EXPANSION AREAS CROW, KYLE 410 WEST REZANOF OPPOSED KAPLAN, MARITA 418 LILLY DRIVE OPPOSED LEE, KAREN 4346 CLIFFSIDE ROAD OPPOSED PRUITT. SIDNEY 3328 MONASHKA BAY ROAD OPPOSED (OWEN, MARION 1223 WEST KOUSKOV SUPPORT PUBLIC HEARING FORM The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly will hold a public hearing on Thursday, April 7, 2011, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers to hear comments on: Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion Areas. ❑ This written argument is in support of the appeal. This written argument is in opposition of the appeal. Name: ( v.cQL. cQ 6o_rna r Residence Address: 4S ? C t&rCc C3 o 7 Po./Sue 1 )) Mailing Address: ? ?C3 4"oc o_L Comments: (.J - oS2 o PPOs 4- o ' r.� a -fpe ( ' o I eJ 1 w ■s cv f e are. haors , v� L2Cs �n-c k locrkooci. ko�J v� ry a re_ q o r e c +cam`, "is-3 it re s 0-3 lc -Fc�r fr (e4-S , ' -ere_ s ,. p ( e I p er - ! cp or Gam-) e ca _47. - Fro 1:/\_6 BSc e ylCQ-r"{ - 1-'ke_ LA IL/LA-cc 41A -cre 0 o e,.. - !o, ( e s d f 3v■.o t.)3 cJ j e cO r of 4-(,-e_ 3 4 - Pra ._ �l/� e S rt e J / 0(00.35 (Y\o -E: - F7no_0: 0 . pL2c a -It f ( o rho C� v, M p o 35 b CC - 11 :: s0.. Wk.-7 �. cr--vvc o Ppo s e- GJe ce o .n. e / 9 r c.' o V po- • ; - M e 1 e� yvt o ti 1 �o r ot. `✓vi os c� s e(-) t o 4 l lnr (c 6 Written argument supporting or opposing the public hearing may be submitted by email to niavierkodiakak.us, faxed to 907- 486 -9391, mailed or hand delivered to the Borough Clerk's Office, 710 Mill Bay Road, Room 101, Kodiak, AK 99615 prior to 5 p.m. on Thursday, April 7, 2011. All written comments submitted on this hearing shall become part of the public hearing record. ■ "Nova Javier 1 From: Robert Barton [rnandbbarton @att.netj Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 9:20 AM To: Nova Javier Subject: Roll cart service expansion Kodiak Island Borough Assembly, We are strongly opposed to any expansion of the roll cart service area. Robert W. (Bill) and Myrna L. Barton 3573,4 Sitkinak Drive PO Box 8995 Kodiak, AK We have the following comments regarding the information provided with the public hearing form recently mailed out on the subject of roll cart area expansion: How can operational efficiencies in garbage collection with carts cost less than collection by dumpsters when 50 or more stops must be made to empty roll carts versus 1 or 2 stops to empty a dumpster? Eliminating residential dumpsters does not promote individual responsibility nor reduce opportunities for abuse i. e. commercial /construction waste in residential containers. It does promote, however, increased illegal burning or roadside dumping. Variable roll cart rates will not provide any incentive to recycle. Based on the rates you have provided, a household could save between 50 cents and $2.85 a week by using roll carts versus dumpsters. Hardly an incentive to separate, containerize and transport recyclables to Threshold Recycling! It advances KIB to an efficient automated collection system that is easily adapted to convenient road -side collection of recyclables in the near future. This will require homeowners to obtain additional roll carts for recyclables. Will the additional carts and the time required to handle them be free? We think not! The net result may be that it is cheaper to have just one roll cart and not recycle! Individual cart based recycling systems yield more material per household than regional bin based collection systems. That is probably true. Unfortunately, that is not what we will have! We will not have a recycling system until a proper handling and processing facility is developed ( like a transfer station? ). In short, we find the information provided by KIB on this issue to be intentionally misleading and unsubstantiated. We have observed roll carts, in areas where they are in use, toppled by wind and snow removal equipment, and waste scattered by roaming dogs, eagles, ravens and magpies. 1 Why would it be prudent to expand this problem to additional areas of the Borough, as well as placing a bear attractant in front of every residence? Also, many of the streets in the proposed expansion areas end in cul de sacs. We don't believe the automated collection system lends itself very well to this condition. A well designed transfer station encourages and facilitates recycling, where roll carts does nothing to promote recycling. A transfer station providing for the recycling of paper, card board, plastic, glass, used motor oil, aluminum cans, tin cans, yard waste, car tires and car batteries will greatly decrease landfill volumes and /or decrease environmental damage. These items could be safely deposited in proper recepticles at a transfer station, at no cost, with remaining waste paid for by weight. Is it expensive to develop a proper transfer station? Yes! Is it financially beneficial to recycle? Not yet! Is it the right thing to do? Yes! Further, it was our understanding that the Assembly already considered and voted for developing transfer stations! Even with a well designed and functional transfer /recycling station system, waste disposal is still required. The current waste site will reach capacity at some time in the future. New waste sites must be located, designed and developed, as soon as possible! We would rather pay to subsidize transfer stations /increased recycling than deal with useless roll carts! 2 a PUBLIC HEARING FORM The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly will hold a public hearing on Thursday, April 7, 2011, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers to hear comments on: Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion Areas. 0 7 This written argument is in support of the appeal. This written argument is in opposition of the appeal. Name: —I— v ci ei Ou) e t il Residence Address: 3 YD ° t ( o /94 A C r f Mailing Address: 3 d j'; E 7/ /Lo P / 4 , /M• ?fits �o Comments: C /} /n 6 f f 0 e d F - ice ,4 e,u � fri-92 )"7" " 4 • • 1 5[,,e o S)4 4)9- "5, 7 &Let - 48 ' 4 64 , ON ttja. I i n ili.. TS 1'1 J h 14i1vzri — r' . " , Soil DI n »1 - Pit - eei› p e I IF ws if 4e d/� ��-/1 " fu/, x &tt(o 1 peek— L i »d.l1. gr's -ka 5 - ,N 9e f Un• inj✓/I 1 4 4, r",6,1 4- - r"t /06 -FA 4-n k S r1 ki FI C 47c-s2,# ( Iyvs •.— 1 iAPer!✓ 1 614 Dt n4 p56 a+t1 'IkI h,•47 zS Ji9 Written / argument supporting or opposing the public hearing may be submitted by email to niavier(a�kodiakak.us, faxed to 907- 486 -9391, mailed or hand delivered to the Borough Clerk's Office, 710 Mill Bay Road, Room 101, Kodiak, AK 99615 prior to 5 p.m. on Thursday, April 7, 2011. All written comments submitted on this hearing shall become part of the public hearing record. i L1 ) S ,-23 � J '/ L ■ PUBLIC HEARING FORM 3 MAR 232011 1 The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly will hold a public hearing on Thursday, April W2011 7 30RiCS OFFICE p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers to hear comments on: Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion Areas. ❑ This written argument is in support of the appeal. This written argument is in opposition of the appeal. Name: /gtit - C)/C,/' to/ - L.l_a/ Residence Address: 3070 7C/ Mailing Address: Comments: - 7: / //..e :A/ jIA " �7 5 ✓� � 4 /I 7i5,9 e d �,4‘ic /, // ,/.eidL /1/99f Ii, Z /u, /l � �� (o �f:9 /� P /26F/) /,4 /at 4 PE / C r'7 z l/ /&e Written argument supporting or opposing the public hearing may be submitted by email to niavier faxed to 907 - 486 -9391, mailed or hand delivered to the Borough Clerk's Office, 710 Mill Bay Road, Room 101, Kodiak, AK 99615 prior to 5 p.m. on Thursday, April 7, 2011. All written comments submitted on this hearing shall become part of the public hearing record. ora iroTE±I;EliVE Ain F 2 011 1 I ; PUBLIC HEARING FORM ( L B iERK's - OFFICE The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly will hold a public hearing on Thursday, April 7, 2011, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers to hear comments on: Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion Areas. ❑ This written argument is in support of the appeal. b This written argument is in opposition of the appeal. Name: /4,t j k ,e_..t._,cA/C--l%l zy U/2)/ Residence Address: ,--261 G/ q / G o� �� ./ 1.2- � � 7 Mailing Address: n d- . � hit , C✓)v.-� /� Comments: \L d ,tJ S&L a- ��.n --1 /7-7-2 "'--44 det-) 't- 1 et A.,_,/ 1 al.( &. .C-�. .. •2 Li--w a 4. P nta .- er .(a az ..2J 1 aim _. 6 ' ..I / _ .. .IL ./ ..L L:— 2- .of-L-......— . — A' r - _.2 -�- / f n , , Y • It . i . 1_a ! . 1 4.: lie !i i a�. 1 L - 'I A -yy� ,//��/, /J / f� Q d 1. *CD 7)14.4 . _ y ' 1l �"".`A„` ,!'l ` i' .t i ..6.,4 } / r Y- l , J■ . _r (12_, 1/4-'% .1 4.1..Q.i Lett. A_ -L.1 .. iJI / / - _a `F- < 1"' - 5 ' t // _ a .- / 40i--61-21-- G� 6 rite / - An /2t .>_ y a�- e--A-' , � -A-� )2, l iG . X- J ( i Cat l/Zi teti a / / i ; / 14 ) 4241 , - A 2. CA 4 ij,U • t- 1 AAA A: Written argument supporting or opposing the public hearing may be submitted by email to njavier(a)kodiakak.us, faxed to 907- 486 -9391, mailed or hand delivered to the Borough Clerk's Office, 710 Mill Bay Road, Room 101, Kodiak, AK 99615 prior to 5 p.m. on Thursday, April 7, 2011. All written comments submitted on this hearing shall become part of the public hearing record. I 0 PUBLIC HEARING FORM The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly will hold a public hearing on Thursday, April 7, 2011, at 7:30 • p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers to hear comments on: Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion Areas. ❑ This written argument is in support of the appeal. r,_i This written argument is in'opposition of the appeal. Name: ,//� /� /7/4 47 Residence Address: 2 if 2-re s�e4" / e 3. yli G "Ger cli Mailing Address: .. e X 3/6 7 �(O C� /d ,c Comments: / 2 .ea. G 5 a'yer , -rit, lark /�ci-�4c e /ter / & c—' h 7 r h (� -i et S 4 .--',47_ "'A y ( i(/. 7 % . .r) 6. ?//,. /.o // / r - / d 'tie' I4 • L L . Ii 1. - , / >7GGi 2 L�� /sgpfi >y '7 / G� / /may ^�� /,- rtf L. a .'(7G' / v � .� .4a-SCt : ' -9 ii.- ,7, r / / C ��)) kea- e 71i ; -Jrw / et a -T iii / r -L cZ!/!�� itt.c� Ti' (YC i . ir;d4-7 G/ o,i c., . a l-OC/,, 1' 7770 et _.0 //Gi'' G J T '^ N ,�i/ , I' � <ek � / %/7 / , ? 7 -1- e c:c/7 J I � e gsn_S ihe- r f-Aa e ercc<c a.Nt Oii 4€. i-c�a -cce c /ct n7 "4 .e_ -� /4 ' / - , , eb-f _ G e ' - �7 ' - la ; el '» // J� " / - 1 IQ i,3 i%4 a- ein n g1Ic‘S c y, /fill ('.i,4irc :.:'a5 virir -e trIl rG1 //j / )/J� ?44 /2/ h /,L c £ ( . 0 /1 4- e- 6`P eL d ;2,14- 7" /lac /c_ 7-7 e>iicc /etcei.e iii 6' v'' 5: a, 4i7 ? trice ee ct -t '€ -0/ %G� aA�//l A G- //P /A- et t i aid; � To r/ , G - / -Z %eies 7nnczc% Anew. e- -4;o/ete //-, 'r-/, / t net -54 J 'b /Y.. �'!.'u o - : , , a_ G . vii/ ,/ / . . C / . • - 77e7_. ,bcV /rn //n e. %S, O Uzi- cc /f, '7-/�rc c vy • , gel et ' Written argument supporting or opposing the public hearing may be submitted by email to niavierkodiakak.us, faxed to 907 - 486 -9391, mailed or hand delivered to the Borough Clerk's Office, 710 Mill Bay Road; Room 101, Kodiak, AK 99615 prior to 5 p.m. on Thursday, April 7, 2011. All written comments submitted on this hearing shall become part of the public hearing record. i I, - Imo_ �_. JS' -- x_1'11 Its 1 I , It MAR 2 3 2011 1,- PUBLIC HEARING FORM 6C??Oti i CUM'S u,1= CE The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly will hold a public hearing on Thursday, April 7, 2011, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers to hear comments on: Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion Areas. ,❑ This written argument is in support of the appeal. This written argument is in opposition of the appeal. Name: ni ICVOit ke, / X Residence Address: 57/) -57m2 4-7 y Mailing Address: /9 Comments: }fie , K-or ,-' or r% i S/scZio ao, type* lC P igz.o r c 7' c — ?it—J.—cc eue ,, 1,4- i ,c 2 Mot a net y /146° I , 4.anar e nnat ve d7 a al, Gl tic2 %�.41141 �/CfrefrVI � 07 f Cr - /ta/ 'l-L A/.. ; rd dCdt? 1, /( /mil Gevi d 'AO �e/4 - a * - ii t cel . ®4.=h 6'7 V-iee A-.; -/ o.,,,,,,,, -,,,,,,,,,45! ----77) ~77 Written argument supporting or opposing the public hearing may be submitted by email to niavier(a kodiakak.us, faxed to 907- 486 -9391, mailed or hand delivered to the Borough Clerk's Office, 710 Mill Bay Road, Room 101, Kodiak, AK 99615 prior to 5 p.m. on Thursday, April 7, 2011. All written comments submitted on this hearing shall become part of the public hearing record. r • F= ---r _ ;)-_ -- - --up I' LI L. MAR 2 3 2011 _. PUBLIC HEARING FORM rv'r The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly will hold a public hearing on Thursday, April 7. 20117 at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers to hear comments on: Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion Areas. 2 This written argument is in support of the appeal. ❑ This written argument is in opposition of the appeal. Name: Residence Address: Mailing Address: Comments: nip-a- ik i �iLLd c2- /net: �Gn�u lam_ c� �ud Site . GP/i d V 7 face -�e K ' J -� I / �.• .. " ( tilt' 2- v r 4, e, / n � �� n 11 5 . �/ �'�" -L 1 - ec f-} 17: a-it/� L ZQ /Lt/l�a • c3150' „ S9nuaa. gape, korDb La Written argument supporting or opposing the public hearing may be submitted by email to niavierkodiakak.us, faxed to 907 - 486 -9391, mailed or hand delivered to the Borough Clerk's Office, 710 Mill Bay Road, Room 101, Kodiak, AK 99615 prior to 5 p:m. on Thursday, April 7, 2011. All written comments submitted on this hearing shall become part of the public hearing record. • Kodiak Island Borough, Alaska PROPERTY APPRAISAL INFORMATION 2011 - Entities Values - PROPERTY 20989 R OWNER ID LINDSEY LIVING TRUST LOUIS CATHERINE 100 100% IMPROVEMENTS 0 Legal Description 11923 3825 324TH AVE SE 250 100% LAND MARKET + 65,600 USS 3100 LT 15A FALL CITY, WA 98024 US 7 100% OWNERSHIP NORD 100% MARKET VALUE = 65,600 100.00% OVER 100% PRODUCTIVITY LOSS - 0 APPRAISED VALUE = 65,600 R7345000156 ACRES: .2700 11111111111111111111111111111111 HS CAP LOSS - 0 SITUS 3150 SPRUCE CAPE RD KODIAK, AK 99615 APPR VAL METHOD: Cost ASSESSED VALUE = 65,600 - GENERAL EXEMPTIONS UTILITIES LAST APPR. RC TOPOGRAPHY LAST APPR. YR 2007 ROAD ACCESS LAST INSP. DATE 10/28/2010 ZONING R2 NEXT INSP. DATE NEXT REASON SKETCH COMMANDS REMARKS The property is vacent with no changes noted. BUILDING PERMITS " ISSUE DT PERMIT TYPE PERMIT AREA ST PERMIT VAL SALE DT PRICE '• GRANTOR DEED INFO SUBD:'USS 3100. 100.00% NBHD:SPCP - '>r100:00°/ IMPROVEMENT' INFORMATION - : 1, i : ; -- - -, ,. IMPROVEMENT FEATURES • . - AS ... ..._- ._ if TYPE DESCRIPTION MTHD GLASSISUBCL AREA UNIT PRICEUNITS BUILT EFF YR COND VALUE D - PAYS ECON FUNC COMP ADJ ADJ VALUE ....�. _ _ . SUBD: US53100 100.00 % 'NBHDtSPCP 400.00 % m L AND INFORMATION . -IRR Wells: 0 Capacity _0 JRR ACres:O Oil Wells: O . ADJ L# alit" CLS TABLE SC HS METH DIMENSIONS PRICE GROSS VALUE MASS ADJ VAL SRC MKT VAL AG APPLY AG CLASS AG TABLE AG UNIT PRC AG VALUE 1. VAC R2 SPRCCP Al N SO 11,796.0000 SO 5.56 65,600 1.00 1.00 A 65,600 NO 0,00 0 00; 9999 65,600 0 Page.1 of 1 Effective Date of Appraisal: January 1 Dale Printed: 04/06/2011 03 by ASCLR2 True Automation, Inc. t . 03/11/2011 17:51 FAX 4866140 001/001(g) .1 - I li it 1 1 ! !j 'I MAR 1 1 2011 ;! J PUBLIC HEARING FORM r r r 'nil /a n :i C ') The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly will hold a public hearing on Thursday, AD '7!'2011�'at 7:30" Lrj GE , p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers to hear comments on: ` Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion Areas. ❑ This written argument is in support of the appeal. El This written argument is in opposition of the appeal. hin Name: ` abed -C LE et "ts e Residence Address: 3 .' 5bl44'esto RD koDiA-h_ A-k 4'SGt Mailing Address: Mike A. a *Ml£ . Comments:114E. 2F4'ws T AI.t f1Pboal 'Tb T-fty it Plut.TtPte .50Ac r ua l +/ No 6tOeuov, r n44 t oR oil lac Adel to uua- tr_t•t Ta PLA•ce TUE 12.0. . c4trS, 2� T 14 15 ALFA IA 15 Qddntt. ` To PLEa l' U4S. ALTRI ni 4 TitE &Ztar Loa tkafato T6 111t `R.A►bn& F 4'44_117E5 ? AdA E ✓N`j . t ttL TO G e • '1 t . to el-DY y. kit `fter t IIMT 6F `Rio5E ii.Mn CA 11 tLctiJTY.1 QECtelt_ fL. w c,tit acic trx M'4 VnrF• aw\ TOO 15 Mar r» t. j No) � but 6aott Eon Ixuc7i a_ Scituce.E QLoot9et tr..tart`lat vsr �LADie-A- wAa ret You. Written argument supporting or opposing the public hearing may be submitted by. email to njavier(kodiakak.us, faxed to b07- 486 -9391, mailed or hand delivered to the Borough Clerk's Office, .710 Mill Bay Road, Room 101, Kodiak, _AK 99615 prior to 6 p.m. on Thursday. April 7. 2011. All written comments submitted on this hearing shall become part of the public hearing record. • 2011 -03 -21 16:05 MILES FISH CO. (907)486- 8204» KodiakIsland8orough 1/1 - - - 11 I L ) ) - - '-a i l it MAR 2 1 2011 I,'- BOROUGH CLERIC O i =!Cr PUBLIC HEARING FORM L The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly will hold a public hearing on Thursday. April 7.2011, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers to hear comments om Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion Areas. © This written argument is in support of the appeal. Q This written argument is in opposition of the appeal. Name: 3j. nSL "fR_Osa. Residence Address: 3 6 I S $ h a c u '. n Rik , Mailing Address: d> 2 N K nd , cs.k Comments: t Q . o, id. /bumf rib 1 • .s1 %ft tn-. c. Crn, L 1 0 . L • W I L• >, • A.1' • • 11► J. LJ• �� • ►. _ a-.••■ •- • .. sw ` i b._ fay _ \. ._ (J• • •-.+ ■ ] ]fl � • 1 __ista • fa 6 L ° r -bet N•._. • I I • L _ 1 ! � . .. ._ `( a.. 11 t. 1 • 1'I - _ . f • ' • )LA1. 1 I . n a39`- �.IL � 4�:- "v.�t.l) fl 0_ _L G 0 1L 1-.a s- .J�,r ens-t 9 n G..ttl . r WY.- \0.1hn e- . A u ns o Lrn • verso ho m n�. . Qww 0- IL_ CY L `s' a:•,_ 6 040 1 • . • f, 4,16, ` ` . a.) t. - . __. i . ►. \ - . J.• 1st ► • • \ _I v •1' . ►._ .JJ� I . _ \ , L.L \ •_ ..- at f. s,, t pp r )2.111a Ina• . as _ f]1._:., _ .•••_A y► (. 11,••• ••_.�f. ..I .1 alit- _.• ' 111 .5 • ♦. • l ia..126 •; �.j ` t . \' ...' •• , a • ) L.4! �.AS.k. r . a a- �2 .A�� � _»(?t. � Cm1\rmckc, n D. 41..a.�.Mr� ,�Qod? Wdtten argument supporting or opposing the public hearing may be submitted by email to niavier@kediakak.us, faxed to 907-486-9391, mailed or hand delivered to the Borough Clerk's Office, 710 Mill Bay Road, Room 101, Kodiak, AK 99615 prior to 5 p.m. on Thursday. April 7, 2011. All written comments submitted on this hearing shall nll o'r, become part of the public hearing record. "h - 1`lb 9''� t.A- •-As-T.? .4- Estae. ._. ..��e�...at>..F�- a- - ' - a _ &Jti_3. &A'mJri.i- ,-” 13 -41-M. - rrw- .04,r-0 y Nova Javier ( / From: Meagan Christiansen Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 8:16 AM To: Rick Gifford; Nova Javier Subject: FW: Online Form Submittal: General Inquiry /Comment/Complaint Form The following comments were submitted via the website... Original Message From: support(acivicplus.com [mailto:support(dcivicplus.com] Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 12:04 AM To: Meagan Christiansen Subject: Online Form Submittal: General Inquiry /Comment /Complaint Form The following form was submitted via your website: General Inquiry /Comment /Complaint Form Name:: Leonard Roberson Address:: 3130 Spruce Cape rd City:: Kodiak State: : Ak Zip:: 99615 Home Phone Number:: 486 -9444 Daytime Phone Number:: Email Address:: lenny(3alaska.net Please Specify Your General Inquiry, Comments or Complaint:: To all borough assembly members, I STRONGLY OPPOSE any plan to expand Alaska Waste roll cart service, The carts are impractical for Kodiak environs, They are far more bothersome than dumpster stations, They discourage reuse and are unsightly laying all over the place. I see cart users doing their best by placing rocks, tire rims and other heavy objects on them trying to keep them upright and from blowing over on there sides and into traffic. Many items placed at dumpsters stations are taken by others and reused, roll carts insure everything discarded is placed into our already stressed landfill. Many communities use sorting stations not only to sort out usable items but sell the items to help fund waste disposal operations. I understood this is what was to take place in Kodiak (transfer stations ?) instead what we are getting is a very aggressive profit by the pound waste company who's only interest is volume based i.e. cash for trash. If ever there was a step backwards this is surly it! No forward looking community would ever impart a volume collected / hauled system on its residents without REUSE / and RECYCLING being the forefront of is operating system!!! Please do not expand this environmentally unfriendly, unpractical and wasteful system into my service area. Thank you to all assembly members for your service. respectfully' Leonard Roberson Additional Information: Form submitted on: 3/10/2011 12:03:34 AM 1 e PUBLIC HEARING FORM The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly will hold a public hearing on Thursday, April 7, 2011, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers to hear comments on: Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion Areas. C 6 i_. fl \�, ❑ This written argument is in support of the appeal. U r 1 • This written argument is i pposition f the appeal— Ey1a�ln s r o n `I� l MAR 1 b / fin � 8 2011 I Name: /-L°O/�c� -/L/.1 h ei�O ri Residence Address: 3, So CPO r 1 r. -e ra , - £ , i Bun 7GUGH CL[.R % ':; u�FICF Mailing Address: .5 ,. , yv1, p - ` Comments:. 1. . A/ rh,; to •Drs /-,.,c/ VA t.__ / 5 /1 /n y /4/ /` r rI n� h/o'A /5,12.11, ./ R n /e s . On p l" /4-Ias kr. tAbe -10 5 i -Pt / // `J�a '1<'C } en? rl -rn 0 '44 € 4 .• ( Ire _ _ A- a t° ii . tL . I, _ .. `95 •124.,. Z /4- 'Ay- C4r ,.,ion k 0 1 1 l.�/A'1°n /, k �J .FF,> n/ l /,�r✓C.ye f h / V/�I,..2.,.J see cG//.e r/ /cot .t ///o evz 'f,(/Uc„N I /ott s k, ar-L 17,:s Aar_ /6—e en At AS � ` Jr10 -1- ,4•1 tiv2- 1 1, Ce e'tc e ) 4 02 7frc / r e- AS 5 r1- 4i4/ y /7F. be a. 7 to rs n k If? 7 %e 4 .:d / y iy .1¢, %r4 hie) /J,/ %e r/1oc✓( /5 /Lc-e 7 I;av, S '• / o . /,/.f/ L°yc /J/a✓t S /0in �j ! �n // / e, f s /d /%c )77 L- (/n� r'7/tl - . ¶Tao t//'l/ rye/Jose -Ti /5 `'/ /0/y Written argument supporting or opposing the public hearing may be submitted by email to niavier(Wkodiakak.us, faxed to 907 - 486 -9391, mailed or hand delivered to the Borough Clerk's Office, 710 Mill Bay Road, Room 101, Kodiak, AK 99615 prior, to 5 p.m. on Thursday, April 7, 2011. All written i comments submitted on this hearing shall become part of the public hearing record. [12 To borough cler • , j ' L � I i MAR 7 201 f I �( T � Please read at�M 17 Assembly meeting l - - - - -- 1 ((( BOROUGH CLERK'S OFFICE j ROLL CART SYSTEM ENVIROMENTALY UNFRIENDLY, DISCOURAGES REUSE As a borough resident I live within sight of three dumpster stations, ( 3130 Spruce Cape Rd ) I see people place many usable items beside dumpsters knowing these items are still usable. I then watch as others stop and take these items home for reuse, furniture, mowers, weed eaters, TV's, bed frames etc. One sure way to add additional burdens to our already stressed landfill is to insure everything discarded (usable or not) is placed into it! Most all private waste companies use weight volume to establish contract pricing based mostly on amount collected / hauled. Many communities have made staging areas (transfer stations) for reusable items mandatory as part of their waste program as data clearly shows reuse is far more economic in comparison to both recycling or disposal . This is what I understood would take place not a cash for trash system . Assembly member Mrs. lynch stated at a recent work session "Of course Alaska waste wants to do away with the dumpsters and expand their roll cart service" this will lower their cost overhead and allow them to make a profit" All businesses coming to Kodiak need to be able to make profit "! Members of the assembly PLEASE do not rush this expansion through , the current roll cart system will increase the amount of trash going into our landfill and discourages reuse. How much profit Alaska waste makes should be the last concern of any elected assembly member! I strongly OPPOSE the expansion of the roll cart system in my area. Thank you to all assembly members for your service. Respectfully' L. Roberson PUBLIC HEARING FORM The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly will hold a public hearing on Thursday, April 7, 2011, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers to hear comments on: Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion Areas. ❑ This written argument is in support of the appeal. In This written argument is in opposition of the appeal. Name: (GU N,V ULF SV /Nh . A AM Residence Address: 3 C4 "7 4/44/t 4 AN `J CO p ®Q Mailing Address: / D /90K 7 72 /fob / ilk A k 99‘41 Comments: „Z WC/diA L k'L lb SE 77/B 4UM / r ri Written argument supporting or opposing the public hearing may be submitted by email to niavierkodiakak.us, faxed to 907 - 486 -9391, mailed or hand delivered to the Borough Clerk's Office, 710 Mill Bay Road, Room 101, Kodiak, AK 99615 prior to 5 p.m. on Thursday, April 7, 2011. All written comments submitted on this hearing shall become part of the public hearing record. • - -Nova Javier From: Steven E Thomsen [alaskawildwine @gci.net] Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 7:14 PM To: Nova Javier Subject: hearing KIB, I do not support the proposed roll cart service. I had to build an enclosure to keep dogs out of my garbage cans because loose dogs are permitted to roam freely. The animal control officer was belligerent, rather than helpful, and I do not wish to be responsible for my garbage left on the street. From experience, I know that it will be my responsibility to clean up messes left by loose dogs. Unless you enforce the animal control laws, my opinion will always remain against trash being left on the street! Steve Thomsen ,q9? `S'Gc�rtck Qr On Vt Kodiak Island Borough, Alaska - -- - PROPERTY APPRAISAL INFORMATION 2011.. Entities Values PROPERTY 16708 R OWNER ID THOMSEN LISA STEVE 100 100% IMPROVEMENTS 184,600 Legal Description 17764 P O BOX 543 2 100% LAND MARKET + 56,300 WOODLAND AC 8TH BK 13 LT 22 KODIAK, AK 99615 US 242 100% OWNERSHIP 250 100% MARKET VALUE — 240,900 100.00% 260 100 % PRODUCTIVITY LOSS - 0 OVER 100% APPRAISED VALUE = 240.900 R2295130122 ACRES: .1900 I IIIIIIIIIII VIII VIII VIII 1111 111 HS CAP LOSS - 0 SITUS 498 SHEARWATER WAY , AK APPR VAL METHOD: Cost ASSESSED VALUE = 240,900 ' , GENERAL -- ' " " '. 1 SKETCH for Improvement #1,(RESIDENTIAL) EXEMPTIONS ` UTILITIES LAST APPR. TOPOGRAPHY LAST APPR. YR 2007 ROAD ACCESS LAST INSP. DATE au n ZONING R2 NEXT INSP. DATE si s'n NEXT REASON 1E0 SKETCH COMMANDS Al STG BAS MD23,ML28,U26,R46,D26,L46 ' REMARKS &, BSM MD67,ML30,U26,R46,D26,L46 <c ATSTG XSUB,MU3,MLB,U6,R4,D6,L4 WDAVG -A XSD1SR13,MD29,ML8,U6,R8,D6,L8 STSHD XS08,MU25,MR16,U8,R20,D8,L20 BAS 2 'L' 1196 2 44 5 1 WDAVG -A BUILDING PERMITS n 46 ISSUE DT PERMIT TYPE PERMIT AREA ST PERMIT VAL 03/24/1999 NSFR 1196 A 25,000 9e SALE DT PRICE GRANTOR DEED INFO usmr - n96 20 J4 SUED WDLB ° 100.00 % :. NBHD:WDLN "100.00% i ' IMPROVEMENT: INFORMATION- . , r' °^ - ? - IMPROVEMENT FEATURES - Pr TYPE DESCRIPTION MTHD CLASS /SUBCL AREA UNIT PRICEUNITS BUILT EFF YR COND VALUE DEPR PHYS ECON FUNC COMP ADJ ADJ VALUE Exterior Wall 03 BAS BASE AREA R 05/ 1,196.0 137.601 1998 1998 AVE 164,600 90% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0.90 148,100 Interior Finish 01 BSM BASEMENT R 05/ 1,196.0 30.001 1998 1998 AVE 35,900 90% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0.90 32.300 Roof Style 01 ATSTG ATTACHED STO R 05/ 24.0 95.00 1 0 1998 AVE 1,500 90% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0.90 1,500 Flooring 05 WDAVGAVG QUAL DEC R 05/ 48.0 17.181 0 1998 AVE 800 90% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0.90 700 Bat of b umer Baths 200 STSHD STORAGE SHED R 05/ 160,0 40,001 0 1998 AVE 2.000 90% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0.90 2.000 Number of Bat 02 1. RES STCD: Al 2 Homesite: N 204,800 184,600 _ Appliance SFFG Number of Bedrooms 03 SUBD1 100.00 % - NBHD:WDLN. .., 100.00% .. LAND INFORMATION IRR Wells 0 ir Ca` acit ° 0 IRR Acres 0 % . Oil Wells 0 L# DESCRIPTION CLS TABLE SC HS METH DIMENSIONS UNIT PRICE GROSS VALUE ADJ MASS ADJ VAL SRC MKT VAL AG APPLY AG CLASS AG TABLE AG UNIT PRG AG VALUE 1. SFR R2 WDLDAC Al N SQ 8,350.0000 SQ 6.74 56,300 1.00 1.00 A 56,300 NO 0.00 0 9999 56,300 0 • Page 1 of 1 Effective Dale of Appraisal: January 1 Date Printed: 04/06/2011 03:46.31PM by ASCLR2 True Automation, Inc. TOO 911101 1717 I. It -I '!I H MAR 1 6 2611 {mot PUBLIC HEARING FORM E('f.(' 1'~ ` ^'•` > D i=I - The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly will hold a public hearing on Thursday, April 7, 2011, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers to hear comments on: Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion Areas. ❑ This written argument is in support of the appeal. 1g_ This written argument is in opposition of the appeal. Name: PO (APE Q Residence Address: L .Vegr, Mailing Address: 71- &6X 3 170 /� mi / FP / 1 � . V (S Comments: //( C. qt-• /%o c PAM Al r I J a,/`e)14 G✓ frvi NP)9Q6dr 4/ / _ at /I do CCaf i9A - Ail, �/lAi 1 a2e, 1'C Ca'' c idito nty yet I7 - a/w8,96-e. IV r/° YWE L C//fl /& 7,ackfieC riggy 1,C Written argument supporting or opposing the public hearing may be submitted by email to njavierkodiakak.us, faxed to 907-486-9391, mailed or hand delivered to the Borough Clerk's Office, 710 Mill Bay Road, Room 101, Kodiak, AK 99615 prior to 5 p.m. on Thursday, April 7, 2011. All written comments submitted on this hearing shall become part of the public hearing record. TOO /TOO'd 1666984 01, )IVICOX S00002 1,NmaIn 140E,9 90 :IT TT03 -91 -HU I l l s S" � i 11 ' ,; I h f i L �E,, MAR 2 3 2011 � .` PUBLIC HEARING FORM BOROUGH CLERICS OFFICE I The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly will hold a public hearing on Thursday, April 7, 2011, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers to hear comments on: Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion Areas. ❑ This written argument is in support of the appeal. This written argument is in opposition of the appeal. it Name: -e h eC r ( - \ .0 t r. 2 S 4 Residence Address: co 1,e) (`h �l7 \f �'< -- Q �"k — V Mailing Address: ° - - - x - - - - - -_- Comments: ( Be_c Da) S-e ny Q4w t, r t c 5 CY) c (Ara S v s,- - rn Yko t1.s9 . (Afi - rk Lo nd - (\.Ol.v.., )1 \\. Y3 - 4' So 01'r 1,05i hc, fl • A - Y' 'Pr5 \`v. Q-4)1 0 / 1 fk (1 c) f Cr) SP \-c V h-e_ ho t da ✓l -�- - A n, • - C \ C A S tom, .t7 r e- s k C A th n JY 1 0 IQ , Written argument supporting or opposing the public hearing may be submitted by email to nlaviera(�kodiakak.us, faxed to 907- 486 -9391, mailed or hand delivered to the Borough Clerk's Office, 710 Mill Bay Road, Room 101, Kodiak, AK 99615 prior to 5 p.m. on Thursday, April 7, 2011. All written comments submitted on this hearing shall become part of the public hearing record. i I it L .. MAR 292011 PUBLIC HEARING FORM I � BOROUGH C .11 K S OFFICE I _ The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly will hold a public hearing on Thursday, April 7, 2011, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers to hear comments on: Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion Areas. D This written argument is in support of the appeal. This written argument is in opposition of the appeal. Name: W Al_T L S V 6a CO'I2\, `N00 nwA p. Residence Address: . e ca-, c A P t Cc) t' A \L `t c, '. - 5 Mailing Address: 4) C >S 22 (- J �' C�1��� 64\C (2 t 6 t <� Comments: 113E Pee- A QP.Y/t���( --v ©??O52c - Cc , "e-, ScpC 13-,6G Co pt \ZaTco'J. 0kvL7/ S'� F-R DceS 1 MI RrsP.t P S T e_ Written argument supporting or opposing the public hearing may be submitted by email to njaviera(�kodiakak.us, faxed to 907 - 486 -9391, mailed or hand delivered to the Borough Clerk's Office, 710 Mill Bay Road, Room 101, Kodiak, AK 99615 prior to 5 p.m. on Thursday, April 7, 2011. All written comments submitted on this hearing shall become part of the public hearing record. PUBLIC HEARING FORM The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly will hold a public hearing on Thursday. April 7, 2011, at 7 :30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers to hear comments on: Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion Areas. IN This written argument is in support of the appeal. l� ❑ This written argument is in opposition of the appeal. � n D, Name: i\' ` G�V �� z 4 S r �:� k " b o ; c \ APR - 7 2011 Residence Address: S 1 � 'I L r,CeLi` �(,� 1 BUN °UGH CLECI;'S OFFICE Mailing Address: SAE Comments: !�'t w k k /-e__ { Q � ,Ca �c �. l , �(: tt1, k y' . . e rcS JJ �j C � y �� � / J (:(� •�"'s`. / I �. ct 1 -� '� [^- .) " Y o:. " -V'L.. c 1 �� / <._ h • - c' R ( r .7-'\. -k +Le_ l ' { . / j 3 S 4- 6t.'K )S lz 0- . -'l. / < 1 I-s n -1 u < 4ti y . Sc "Ft S "1 4 1 ( `h it"- Lai 1 h e / u- - 14. s vti..r:1.5 v --k "r` -h, i '• 1- - 1. ,Lt. Lev ; -1y <s : ��s r 5t e ( 5 5 k./" / X-f - 4e"f i l � 111 re"-_ • /_ ti f../ � 'cL- �'rj •�- /Le re( t 1 J ✓7 /.-1� —'-�-- d / r li' lu (iE?J ke u 4.) : .2ct�i � 0- 4— / —k C e" I .4=1 .� C i ✓ ✓f S c v7�t Q -k` , 1 /A_ cam_ Mk . vl • c •11 c • i J:.. Ro e � I /k 4,, l Mer Fy ,1 �1 noL Lt"r�•�( t .Z ( c. rtit r'h_ c t • I I s Y i 1-.4" fu. c ! la 6--;--( a I 'i n � . .�'z J-,��( 4La to d E t c�ti Written argument supporting ofr opposing the public hear j may be su6fn by email to niavierCa)kodiakak.us, faxed to 907 - 486 -9391, mailed or hand delivered to the Borough Clerk's Office, 710 Mill Bay Road, Room 101, Kodiak, AK 99615 prior to 5 p.m. on Thursday, April 7, 2011. All written comments submitted on this hearing shall become part of the public hearing record. PUBLIC HEARING FORM The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly will hold a public hearing on Thursday, April 7, 2011, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers to hear comments on: Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion Areas. This written argument is in support of the appeal. ❑ This ( � written __ argumeentt //is in opposition of the appeal. ri Name: aiL RasdenczAddress: 42 f • T7 2 'V` Mailing Address: T m A ma �r L / / % / J ✓ Comments: E Cis ,u Li iv1AA 2 4 2011 J I BOROUGH CLERICS OFFICE j Written argument supporting or opposing the public hearing may be submitted by email to niavier @kodiakak.us, faxed to 907 - 486 -9391, mailed or hand delivered to the Borough Clerk's Office, 710 Mill Bay Road, Room 101, Kodiak, AK 99615 prior to 5 p.m. on Thursday, April 7, 2011. All written comments submitted on this hearing shall become part of the public hearing record. D D _ APR 7 2011 PUBLIC HEARING FORM j I I BOROUGH CLERK'S OFFICE The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly will hold a public hearing on Thursday, AputU O - et4:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers to hear comments on: Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion Areas. This written argument is in support of the appeal. ❑ This written argument is in opposition of the appeal. Name: ‘kSz`c [•L— ` Q`n Residence Address: ..1D-V3 Katy v ' — Kod,ta -cc , (11t. 4q i 5 Mailing Address: ' '. f7, ‘"? LI I4 K��,at< , (� 1C , 6tRto t.5 Comments: ( escn4 v p ,ter 5ctC t e L hace_ cfa :ck, rne- amocc At Q9 4. arnAt d r,a .-aer month. vv._ _iahI - I r0 A_ (s C Cnrt c-\a y\o Ind e- a,S me ah coa5e, Q2 LZ fa_d\1C, t2 toot L_ mat e a C\c_k(zKt e- S ca re,(c\ \ `had , - -Intt nG l J 0 kt Pn a\- baoCs u. cncs Q& ktc. C ?tfab t V (h a__ 3e_r1,'ot- cSts_ C,cLr k \CC *C \ &tt w\0nM4\1c eXPa∎n°>r <5 v be__ Cvns\dr ��ss `4kac\ "Aka CLLrpNV\t Thon`(hlc\ �C) Lk.), i441 1'4 _ ,./Ai' Written argument supporting or opposing the public hearing may be submitted by email to niaviera(7-kodiakak.us, faxed to 907- 486 -9391, mailed or hand delivered to the Borough Clerk's Office, 710 Mill Bay Road, Room 101, Kodiak, AK 99615 prior to 5 p.m. on Thursday, April 7, 2011. All written comments submitted on this hearing shall become part of the public hearing record. 0 1, R 1 . APR -7 2011 I !, PUBLIC HEARING FORM - K� pF CE The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly will hold a public hearing on Thursd y,W`dF�z10 — - p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers to hear comments on: Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion Areas. This written argument is in support of the appeal. e a , / . ❑ This written argument is in opposition of the appeal. Name: -7 5b � 1 /1 /A rsei . - UZG.JI 4.6- e6C, -_ Residence Address: >3-3( ,Aen! OCIt." e-- Mailing Address: 3,33 4 , O rL u`e Comments: tie. 5¥'2)(' Lj Sup( 't 4 (,--/-.- �ctVi (J J J rxsn , 11)L y 00( rcnR` -r6-1 ------ 5c= r,,-,tti- tktaiEci F � l ° C c* bvi o 11 1 Li l'e, 5t 1 b J/ _ w, c/ in I} /� ,l d r� b OLlt' L! 4 k, ! 'eC 1 Cl,� , it, ,i5, (cc-l�'l 1 •,.ucrC,/ � „ .t O„Am ( . , ,,, 0-, Jo Shera 1gt � c h�� stir o n 7� 6i s bJ : our II, 6lk hoc 110 o A le gs , 1e!-e ,.5 h C J(cur , (cc o ( J c�vn., � �^0d )4, c u't4S 5 e /\ea CA . 1'>�Sh rutn2c 1 T`e I n h hor- s ' -r-cs, /c* cc, .1 0�fen s 7lwdivt Prtt7ecl o0.E\ A Y ' c-r - io , ` 0P % 1 6 L > S 1in0l hoAl > . Yh 64,,Mrz7;1 ct !so ptl c bits , Ve ke, �ie :5 Ant I G ) e bu-Ci on oe tens; bac. 0 . h6crs ■ » e ,O _ f ( q \--if . av'c lc,i (0 r hM erg Written argument supporting or opposing the public hearing may be submitted by email to niavier(a)kodiakak.us, faxed to 907 - 486 -9391, mailed or hand delivered to the Borough Clerk's Office, 710 Mill Bay Road, Room 101, Kodiak, AK 99615 prior to 5 p.m. on Thursday, April 7, 2011. All written comments submitted on this hearing shall become part of the public hearing record. Nova Javier From: Lisa [clearblueocean123 @yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 8:25 PM To: Nova Javier Subject: Roll cart service I'm writing in favor of the roll cart service in the la area. Our residence is located on Katmai dr. We have had many problems with the dumpster on Sharatin which is located very close to our home. The dumpster has been on fire, overflowing with trash on numerous occasions, people dump large items near it, then there's the rats, birds dropping garbage in our yard, and a few bears, I feel that roll cart service will be a improvement for our family, and the area. Mike & Lisa Reuter 3240. katmai dr P.o. Box 1489 Kodiak, Ak. 99615 —� Sent from my iPad { 2011 I APR " 6 BOROUGH CLERK'S OMCE Nova Javier From: Steve Smith [Steve.Smith @kanaweb.org] Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 12:53 PM To: Nova Javier Subject: Written argument in support of the appeal Name: Steven J. Smith Residence: 2919 Spruce Cape Rd Mailing Address: 2919 Spruce Cape Rd Comments: I am a light sleeper and unfortunately live across the street from one of the busiest dumpsters in town. I am literally tired from all the noise and traffic. The noise created from people dropping in garbage and large appliances at all hours of the night, yes even at 4am, keeps me up. Sometimes the wind slamming the lids will wake me up. Furthermore, the noise of the traffic, usually either a rice rocket or a 4X4 with a fancy exhaust system and spinning tires, speeding away from the dumpster is also very disturbing. Sometimes I daydream about how nice it would be to really dream again. I can't wear earplugs as I have a very young daughter I need to listen for during the night. All the noise will often wake her as well. I sometimes envy her as she can take naps whenever she feels the need. Please, I beg you...DUMP THE DUMPSTER before I push it off the side of the cliff myself !!! Steven Smith 2919 Spruce Cape Rd Kodiak AK 99615 (907) 486 -1352 (W) (907) 486 -2789 (H) StevenSmthS a,hotmail.com (P) Steve.SmithP,kanaweb.org (W) CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: This may contain confidential, protected health information or information that is legally privileged. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity listed or addressed. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the content of these documents is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please notify the sender immediately and arrange for the return or destruction of these documents. Kodiak Island Borough, Alaska _ _ PROPERTY APPRAISAL INFORMATION 2011 - Entities Values PROPERTY 20873 R OWNER ID WEST DONALD SANDRA 100 100% IMPROVEMENTS 165,100 Legal Description 18855 2474 SPRUCE CAPE RD. 250 100% LAND MARKET + 57,100 USS 3099 LT 18C KODIAK, AK 99615 US 7 100% OWNERSHIP NORD 100% MARKET VALUE = 222.200 100.00% OVER 100% PRODUCTIVITY LOSS 0 APPRAISED VALUE = 222,200 R7335000184 ACRES: .1700 11111111111111111111111111111111111 HS CAP LOSS - 0 SITUS 2474 SPRUCE CAPE RD KODIAK, AK 99615 APPR VAL METHOD: Cost ASSESSED VALUE = 222,200 GENERAL ' ' ,'SKETCH for lrnprovemerit #1 (RESIDENTIAL) - EXEMPTIONS UTILITIES LAST APPR. RC DV Disabled Veteran TOPOGRAPHY LAST APPR. YR 2011 ROAD ACCESS LAST INSP. DATE 01/12/2011 a e 4 ZONING R1 NEXT INSP. DATE ,' �{y+„ w _.... NEXT REASON g PICTURE _ N. b 95 t;321112 ' d l' Kt REMARKS The property is in average to good condition, INDAVG -G -_ 3 K zu t0,4 y. .37 1 2 , I composite shingle roof, well painted wood siding, 12 Y y� �✓•q.,4 wood frame windows. new trex deck and Jssi '. � ,;- 't "�,, i Dl greenhouse. 11 , , .. Jil BUILDIN PERMITS ' ' ,ii xns BAS2 0 ISSUE DT PERMIT TYPE PERMIT AREA ST PERMIT VAL 1278 i 11 645 13 10 19 r "4 'SALE DT: PRICE ' GRANTOR ' " - DEED INFO' 1 t yr �i, I ---1 E v . 08/01/1994 MENGEL WD / 131 / 239 «' � 7A , 111 11 '" . ,, s /t 1 SUBD:. USS 3099 100.00% NBHD.SPCP ;100 IMPROVEMENT INFORMATION _ t : , - -- ',IMPROVEMENT FEATURES IF =PE DESCRIPTION MTHD CLASS /SUBCL AREA UNIT PRICEUNITS BUILT EFF YR COND. VALUE DEPR PHYS ECON FUNC COMP ADJ ADJ VALUE Exterior Wall 03 BAS BASE AREA R 05/ 1,278.0 116.281 1942 1980 AVE 148,600 70% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0.70 104,000 Interior Finish 01 WDAVG/Vood Deck R 05/ 352 .3 11.12 1 0 2000 GOOD 3,900 94% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0.94 3,700 Roof Style 01 BAS2 BASE AREA 2N R *I 645.0 116.261 0 1980 75,000 70% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0.70 52,500 Flooring 04 GRNHSGREEN HOUSE R 05/ 96.0 50.80 1 0 2000 AVE 4,900 92% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0.92 4,500 Bath o b umer f s 2 WDAVGAVG QUAL DEC R 05/ 28.0 18.981 0 1980 AVE 500 70% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0.70 400 N f Bath 02 1. RES STCD: Al 2,399.3 Heating/Cooling er 399.3 Homesite: Y(100 %) 232,900 165,100 _ Appliance SFAG Number of Bedrooms 04 SUBD: USS 3099 100.00% NBHD'SPCP 100.00% - ' , LAND INFORMATION IRR Wells: 0 ' Capacity 0 ' IRR Acres: 0 Oil wells :0 ',.. ,; Lit DESCRIPTION CL . _...,.,.__N__ TABLE _ SC . ,.._ ..ONS UNIT P _, __ RI __ _. _.__ _. _ _. ___ .._. . . S SC HS METH DIMENSIONS RICE GROSS VALUE ADJ MASS ADJ VAL SRC MKT VAL AG APPLY AG CLASS AG TABLE AG UNIT PRO AG VALUE 1. SFR Ri SPRCCP Al Y (100 %) SO 7,490.0000 SQ 7.63 57,100 1.00 1.00 A 57,100 NO 0.00 0 SFR 57,100 0 Page 1 of 1 Effective Date of Appraisal: January 1 Date Printed: 04/06/2011 03:47:31 PM by ASCLR2 True Automation, Inc. I � � \\-] APR � 4 ZO» ± Sandra West 2474 Spruce Cape Road BOROU CEE OFFICE I am in favor of expanding the Roll Cart Service in my neighborhood for the following reasons: Garbage and trash are outside for a much smaller window of time, one hour compared to 24/7 with a dumpster and less opportunity for bears, wind, dogs, and birds to get into the trash. Cheaper for my family. Healthier and more sanitary for the neighborhood. Cleaner too. Promotes individual responsibility. Reduces abuse and commercial waste. More incentive to recycle which reduces solid waste in the land fill which saves money for all residents. Leads toward Roll Cart recycling pickup. Less gas used than when every household hauls trash and recycling individually. We should allow for bear - resistant Carts to be ordered and tested for areas of concern. Actual days of high winds that coincide with the one day a week of trash pickup for each area should be workable for creative Kodiak people. Thank you all, Sandra West .1f \y I. . jl t Lj), l. ,, 1 1 - -- - ,' 1 �I T tl MAR 2 5 2011 ' bi ll PUBLIC HEARING FORM � gn ;PUGN CL'MRK'S OFFICE. 1 The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly will hold a public hearing on Thursday, April_7,.2011, -at -7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers to hear comments on: Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Wa to Proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion Areas. This written argument is .... ; • - appeal. !❑ This written argument is in opposition of the appeal. ■ Name: JZUSS t %D i Soo/ . 1�4W.1 f )LL -. Residence Address: 3s) T C+Qt •vV4y ' Mailing Address: _ Mr S Mrs Russell Zullick 538 Company Farm Rd. Comments: 4Aspers, PA 17304 -9430 C.tfA /ryi -vr oAA- do 4ttt" — '' /mwA.404, It' ,b vines regs Written argument supporting or opposing the public hearing may be submitted by email to niavier(o kodiakak.us, faxed to 907 - 486 -9391, mailed or hand delivered to the Borough Clerk's Office, 710 Mill Bay Road, Room 101, Kodiak, AK 99615 prior to 5 p.m. on Thursday, April 7, 2011. All written comments submitted on this hearing shall become part of the public hearing record. Nova Javier From: Sharon Porter [sharon.porter @gci.net] Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 3:09 PM To: Nova Javier Subject: re Proposed Roll -cart Service Expansion Areas Regarding Roll -cart Services: I am in favor of re- cycling and lengthening the life of Kodiak's landfill as well as lowering garbage rates. What concerns me is that garbage cans (full and empty) will blow down the streets and into neighbors yards during high winds, not to mention causing traffic hazards. I'm interested in learning how this problem was previously addressed. I live in area 1A. Thank you Sharon Portr 3247 Katmae ` Drive [ (L� h MAR 2 9 2011 Rr,!;CLG CLIR!CS OFFICE r 03/22/2011 05:19 4135935637 TOM VNN _,_ PAGE 01 l MAR 22 2011 BOROUGH CLERK'S OFFICE I PUBLIC HEARING FORM The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly will hold a public hearing on Thursday. Anil 7.2011, at 7: 0 p.m. In the Borough Assembly Chambers to hear comments on: Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Waste proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion Areas. ❑ This written argument Is In support of the appeal This written argument is in opposition of the appeal. Name: /CO LGr Ce Residence Address: 20 9r SE 11 r"7" (4v7 Marling Address: Comments: Sea/LS /A) Afae f f4L.r N C; c#41237.5 t Pr 4M, c awn 1c kiwi' fre At/ J7o ✓1?�= S 7�fl 4t.:.,,a L an Flit 15 Written argument supporting or opposing the public hearing may be submitted by email to niavierekodiakak.us, faxed to 907 - 488 -9391, mailed or hand delivered to the Borough Clerk's Office, 710 Mill Bay Road, Room 101, Kodiak, AX 99815 prior to 3 p.m. on Thursday. Anil 7, 2011. All Mites comments submitted on this hearing shall become part of the public hearing record. I I� MAR 2 9 2011 j PUBLIC HEARING FORM - - - - - - --� LBOROUGH CLER'K'S OFFICE The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly will hold a public hearing on Thursday, April 7, 2011, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers to hear comments on: Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion Areas. ❑ This written argument is in support of the appeal. e/ E 1/ This written argument is in opposition of the appeal. Name: ?e -e Me ss& I Loa q) oDd Residence Address: 2- 1 ? 5 ? ) Set e f L - Mailing Address: SeAV.e (LS abuue_, Comments: \\., i. an 1 (l Ov�cc5tl-I c5Y1 DC Atli li a lo�' e -C-Tv [ rr •-ea,✓ c k -Vaslr bei 1 Spteat{ cl,)a -le 2) less /ea .6 Iecyle_. ) Lu e s cloy_ cLovvt psk klnreskolcl i{ecel +144 le •■5 1ti1A(e unuieVLieitie - dle0 O `f'c 5 ' tut we Lk ire o- e { (% 6LY W i 1I e t_uci I . Written argument supporting or opposing the public hearing may be submitted by email to niavierkodiakak.us, faxed to 907 - 486 -9391, mailed or hand delivered to the Borough Clerk's Office, 710 Mill Bay Road, Room 101, Kodiak, AK 99615 prior to 5 p.m. on Thursday, April 7, 2011. All written comments submitted on this hearing shall become part of the public hearing record. i t' . i \ ( i j ..I, MAR 2 1 2011 , � � i PUBLIC HEARING FORM ■ __I BOROUGH' CLERK'S OFFICE The Kodiak Island. Borough Assembly will hold a public hearing on Thursday7Apr117, -2011; af7i30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers to hear Comments on; Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion Areas. V This written argument is in support of the appeal. E7 This written argument is inopposition of the appeal. • Name: S U IV SA A OVI e 1 E rE: {oz/ [ ET M A R 1 'J Residence Address: P 3 5 B &AVCIQ. LAkE ' D I V � IOb l k. r AK i Mailing Address: o .pax a A/ � q_%/5 ilk ? Comments: . Wt A d a — I N FAVOR A-n/D IN SuPPOYeT C) >~ 7 A of *s r- PRopo(skJ) ROLL CA-RY S FRO 0._! FJXPA-Als/oA/ PLAN" A-Alb W- w - A-nr7 ) 7b rW MoV54 77 E )(PFAJSWE REslbEk[TIA -L ] cMfr0e.. IN oiX AREA . w !Rr MooF1AIh 774 --r 7 IS PioPds ) 6oLL CAIC-T S ER V I Lt E &% PAT S oi\I AIee-A s • PLA WILL BE A Ut AiJb I M-PL EfIEN7?1) A sooty As PosstLBLE, 7r7 k sit So M u & N ! • Written argument supporting or opposing the public hearing may be Submitted by email to niavier@kodiakak.us, faxed to 907- 486 - 9391, mailed or hand delivered to the Borough Clerk's Office, 710 MITI Bay Road, Rooin 101, Kodiak, AK 99615 prior to 5 p.m: on Thursday, April 7, 2011 'All written comments submitted on this hearing shall become part of the public hearing record. LO /L0 BOVd Aiddr1S 3NIatN >IVI00N Z99Z980L06 6b :80 IIOZ /ET /£O Nova Javier From: Margaret Roberts [mroberts3 @gci.net] Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 3:09 PM To: Nova Javier Subject: Written Comments for April 7th Public Hearing on r -II cart service Name: Margaret Roberts Residence Adress: 1994 Selief Lane, Kodiak, AK 99615 Mailing Address: same Written argument in support of expanding roll cart service in Area 1B. I am writing in support of expanding roll -cart service into Area 1B. This area, for whatever reason, is not within the city limits, but we are surrounded by neighborhoods that are, including all but my small stretch of Selief Lane. It doesn't seem logical to exclude us from this service. I believe that this system encourages people to conserve and recycle, and that it is also more convenient. I am currently paying over $40 a month for the "privilege" of taking my one bag of garbage per week to a dumpster. My neighborhood dumpsters have been replaced with one "super - dumpster" that is extremely difficult to open - the openings are too high and too heavy. I can't imagine how anyone older or shorter than myself, not to mention a person with arthritis or any other debilitating condition, can use this dumpster. I look forward to having a roll -cart that I can simply wheel down my driveway, and to paying less for using it. I cannot speak for the people who live in the other areas that are being considered for roll - cart service. For Area 1B I consider it the only logical thing to do. Thank you for your consideration. Margaret Roberts \; i e MAR 1 6 2011 1 pc oil I I MAR 2 3 2 011 PUBLIC HEARING FORM i BOROUGH CLERICS OFFICE The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly will hold a public hearing on Thursday, April_7,.2011 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers to hear comments on: Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion Areas. This written argument is in support of the appeal. ❑ This written argument is in opposition ^ of ft the appeal. Name: LC4'NZ & ITN' / e SCjl�'g/t - 'Dick, / n Residence Address: JarPJ B e4 G.ep- take k- L ak 4 . � i Mailing Address: curs //,,' °p , s 0 . d 4144-44- Comment s: � i 6(1./ Oil C (ti. � k4J/ Ert .C.(7 Written Written argument supporting or opposing the public hearing may be submitted by email to niavier(a�kodiakak.us, faxed to 907 - 486 -9391, mailed or hand delivered to the Borough Clerk's Office, 710 Mill Bay Road, Room 101, Kodiak, AK 99615 prior to 5 p.m. on Thursday, April 7, 2011. All written comments submitted on this hearing shall become part of the public hearing record. s APR - 4 2011 PUBLICHEARING FORM I - BOR0110bl CLERK'S OFFICE The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly will hold a public hearing on Thursday,Aprd_7,- 2011 -7430� p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers to hear comments on: Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion Areas. ❑ This written argument is in support of the appeal. This written argument is in opposition of the appeal. Name: ap (-t- N-RNN Residence Address: ' 3lrl 2Pr./E;/J r✓r � lE Mailing Address: 'r0 t3OX t to 3Lo Comments: X i)O NOT' AGUE w/ YW6 7 en /0 /'6W o FOB /hy meE/i 7//L- 0- Ss AQE /vvi ,n,bd a6 4,/0*6 C-ie 774= e 3 c/cs m ,240Q r4» At" law0- r E. i o'?tc. 7 ACclet S 7V /ye/i✓6 . m v a64 /:JG.v7, en, y 77fr5 F4-eerb ENTS. < At so Se - / Ct ✓E 7W,tT ° ' -5 .v l ,Z GETS E 4n4 cif 77,6 / <ani7/Yy.✓CGS 77/6 --a : ✓L/' c A; "xi «ew . '/bac R ,'mc, /r.2e. 3 /Ei't. S 9/50 LS n-2', ,9 Cl7`7 2e-na �✓ / /FLE • WAY NFU/ "I*t tv 771E 540 t✓ E3to4xS. 2 X - *rc Th -- 77/C Ai4" Acre -CS S E2ve OWE ,9iZ A lucre Y L.56-0 -s66 zEw Ni ,4 b A t 77 6 fs �9 &AGf C..4NS Written argument supporting or opposing the public hearing may be submitted by email to niavier(ai7kodiakak.us, faxed to 907 - 486 -9391, mailed or hand delivered to the Borough Clerk's Office, 710 Mill Bay Road, Room 101, Kodiak, AK 99615 prior to 5 p.m. on Thursday, April 7, 2011. All written comments submitted on this hearing shall become part of the public hearing record. PUBLIC HEARING FORM The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly will hold a public hearing on Thursday, April 7, 2011, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers to hear comments on: Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion Areas ❑ This written argument is in support of the appeal. DD LS This written argument is in opposition of the appeal. q i APR - 1 2011 I Name: :DO c U 4 S, ti / � ._ . -- Residence Address: ..1/ / 0 0 P'f bass t RnRnHGH CLERK'S OFFICE Mailing Address: 1_6. 60> a /f / C ^ `�/{, K t 961 Comments: _5 cn 4c/l f 4 %effP^ Written argument supporting or opposing the public hearing may be submitted by email to njavier(hTkodiakak.us, faxed to 907- 486 -9391, mailed or hand delivered to the Borough Clerk's Office, 710 Mill Bay Road, Room 101, Kodiak, AK 99615 prior to 5 p.m. on Thursday, April 7, 2011. All written comments submitted on this hearing shall become part of the public hearing record. • To the Kodiak Borough Assembly, I don't think that the proposed roll cart service is a good idea in the Island lake area. The main reason for my disapproval is SAFETY. Every year we have a few bears come to visit our dumpster down by the park. What this proposal will do is bring the bears to our front door. We also have some elderly people in our neighborhood that I really can't see rolling the cart down an icy driveway without risking serious injury. The other problem with Island lake road is the lack of sidewalks and curbs. This will be a problem for such a narrow road, because a lot of the roll carts are going to be placed on the road and then you will end up with traffic issues. I don't like looking at the mess around the dumpster either, but I don't think the roll carts are the best solution. I think if the sanitation people actually cleaned up on a regular basis in which we are being charged for, there won't be the eye sore there is now. It would also make their job easier if we had a three sided fenced in area around the dumpster with ample room on both sides to access the doors. I think this might discourage some people from placing their trash on the outside of the fence. The fencing and dumpster should also be placed on a concrete pad which would also aid in cleanup. Sincerely, Doug Bunting ETC E E , APR -52011 1 6 PUBLIC HEARING FORM BOROUGH CLERK'S OFFICE The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly will hold a public hearing on Thursday, April 7, 2011, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers to hear comments on: Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion Areas. ❑ This written argument is in support of the appeal. This written argument is in opposition of the appeal. Name: /'G /a / e ti Residence Address: ?; /6 /, 2 a>- (0 • A 0ci/a -k AA-5 V6 Mailing Address: . 2 Comments: /9, S /O /iE; /ny70C &(/ hJ // ca, 47,r f,'?; /// /0 /fly m ac 7-e- t/ l � rit/ •e Cc- h, 4 dram ca- . /4 c- e- aScf-s ct Q /ffle iv °-f% l O// L / c� (1 up at 11d oGr/i2- c U r de-fit/ LL / /GL�j l wf9.'t7 5 r 7TP / B� )) f11 P/,'4/ e /'73/4 ACe, t✓✓Q Lev,/ /'.S c //c% an 6 ,O1 7` a/ / > 0%e.; G t ✓ /) f /4 ez,,,'%,e .6 a yt /0 /i / / /2 0 / cc rzi 7 e--- co .7 /ix Jo e' n / fp // Ad :O ul 0J /Az ctitzj 07 /% e s4 0 G// i 5' c 14/ / ✓L7 , ey /14 74 c ) r, di/ / / le / c max,/ M d- • 54e is a- / (S ,ed//ci c_ i /,1,,e n cc-� 0 A /y c,. ia --C >l< so72 /, r� f jr Co/lrL f / d�- /P,CLV i� s /`� <-.o co ( l am //G OA Or M O IA T /'I'eiS.e- c©t W n i T"/// r , ,,e, e ' / J A # . , f - , . / X s»' r c . J r r [ / H Ct c� t� /if/ �� Lz - -/2 •P 7 c c / 4.1:' J i.% rA.91. /'I ii ,/ et* //.'n Written argument supporting or opposing the public hearing may be submitted by email to njavier( kodiakak.us, faxed to 907- 486 -9391, mailed or hand delivered to the Borough Clerk's Office, 710 Mill Bay Road, Room 101, Kodiak, AK 99615 prior to 5 p.m. on Thursday, April 7, 2011. All written comments submitted on this hearing shall become part of the public hearing record. PUBLIC HEARING FORM The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly will hold a public hearing on Thursday, April 7, 2011, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers to hear comments on: Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion Areas. ❑ This written argument is in support of the appeal. j fi This written argument is in opposition of the appeal. Nam��i/ _ _ _ S__ ,r Residence Address: / _� Mailing Address: P x { <' Comments: /o _ ��� is v / o �� 9r Q 3 7 / pp P • 4 09 4 .) (- k Yi (:a a 7P +� � � Ar 9 . . c .4.-1,/ �C.P /I�J2i�e /a P 0 .4 _ r A Y r ifi24j.,t Le ,lam Y ,B _ . n rn A • C -�— // /� �� a • _ /� __ / • _.. / liC/ �.G( Written argument supporting or opposing the public hearing may be submitted by email to njavier(d.kodiakak.us, faxed to 907- 486 -9391, mailed or hand delivered to the Borough Clerk's Office, 710 Mill Bay Road, Room 101, Kodiak, AK 99615 prior to 5 p.m. on Thursday, April 7, 2011. All written comments submitted on this hearing shall become part of the public hearing record. i� • i E i',; E !i ,__ is I IL Li, MAR 2 3 2011 ,' PUBLIC HEARING FORM i BOROUGH CLERK'S OFFICE The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly will hold a public hearing on Thursday, April 7, 2011, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers to hear comments on: Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion Areas. ❑ This written argument is in support of the appeal. _ Thi written argument is in opposition of the appeal. Name: WeJ ErU 6r Residence Address: v 23 q C7 (`I ft 0....,, &t 0....,, fibs' Mailing Address: D I I 0.4 &AC I c»C Cf- - Comments: X (1 Olin VD 1 ` ice ok"`ett_ h , Ch , • W tg I --- >rit -5L-g 5-en tLei U _ 4 an(L L' ,)0 6 \frk ecOr , Written argument supporting or opposing the public hearing may be submitted by email to nlavierna,kodiakak.us, faxed to 907 - 486 -9391, mailed or hand delivered to the Borough Clerk's Office, 710 Mill Bay Road, Room 101, Kodiak, AK 99615 prior to 5 p.m. on Thursday, April 7, 2011. All written comments submitted on this hearing shall become part of the public hearing record. FROM (WHO)MHR 31 2011 13: 31 /ST. 13: 30 /NO. 7500000973 P l V 1 ? 2.011 J PUBLIC HEARING FORM MAR 0 r+ E k r , rni' The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly will hold a public healing .4A ng on Thursdavp ln7;(201.1; at l 7:30 ( S p.m. In the Borough Assembly Chambers to hear comments on: Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion Areas. OrFII� ❑ This written argument is in support of the appeal. I t, This written argument is in opposition of the appeal. Name: ,ie,t1r J •[ 71' N eknl^ �a)K54- Residence Address: � t1JCt IA) 1 J / [� Mailing Address: n $ Ox �d3 0 Alr^9� Comments: " 1 S z cui, I biter ots fried p JS✓ JJ_ 'f�D (-k ,� p�15� a � p" Poi Card �e rd � c� r � CSI) r7f ti �-e 44 t o((t r'. 0 roc b S Y-w t---b e, f ° 7 -ea . U Written argument supporting or opposing the public hearing may be submitted by email to niavier@kodiakak.us, faxed to 907 -486 -9391, mailed or hand delivered to the Borough Clerk's Office, 710 Mill Bay Road, Room 101, Kodiak, AK 99615 prior to 5 p.m. on Thursday, April 7, 2011. All written comments submitted on this hearing shall become part of the public hearing record. tli ( L I , . MAR 2 3 2011.1 PUBLIC HEARING FORM - The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly will hold a public hearing on Thursday, 7, 2011, p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers to hear comments on: Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion Areas. ❑ This written argument is in support of the appeal. k J This written argument is in opposition of the appeal. Name: ( At_k_c L l , J c�u^I J So^� Residence Address: Z'-i Mailing Address: PC) r 2- I ) Comments: ( (tLt ©u2- ':. um c t £.c — A NS T .A -NA NL t'W — Lk/LT _ S�Zvt e • Written argument supporting or opposing the public hearing may be submitted by email to niavier(7a.kodiakak.us, faxed to 907 - 486 -9391, mailed or hand delivered to the Borough Clerk's Office, 710 Mill Bay Road, Room 101, Kodiak, AK 99615 prior to 5 p.m. on Thursday, April 7, 2011. All written comments submitted on this hearing shall become part of the public hearing record. 7 CIE 1L APR - Zt)» PUBLIC HEARING FORM 9nRolir CLERK'S OFFICE The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly will hold a public hearing on Thursd it 7 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers to hear comments on: Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion Areas. ❑ This written argument is in support of the appeal. This written argument is in'opposition of the appeal. is ? /7 Name: Camlb 0z yo/V Residence Address: 72-5 ,Y ,C7� Mailing Address: /5D x 3 2- Comments: // � 9 / ✓e Duff (// 5) - f /� c�r�° Ora? &P�.( eve" r'vr/J ciar cer /Ge / year gt ; ate/ 5),0,9'te &a /115 't 7t2 i< o %r Oyt G or,65/e Sere /ce _ /%erew" P r 7S- '494 Di rea 1.51/C train 04 546M 404 , 77" tk des n,01 9P-ern 7`D e_ Cv5P 27f iS d�iv / 7 hro Mt ; - wit ,'/ . r q Cd6c7 4 911/ 9 /Ve / k2 a pri✓q7 d Cer /ran/ oti pr- • / f ' � . Tf e v47 oe // Sf op 7 'n -Aram Gv,0257 n7 f iis/, /49,74 04(e co /f % /4. 27 rh y r�5t._ vifrd may of�e�-s 1 er-e qrg�. i4eri driver.,a 52- g '»orb , nd 7 lG 5 / ry int/eA/t/ in Meg 6V/n7'er /eve, %,ro r 'Prv/Ce ;t /iia,4/7 l rea, Written argument supporting or opposing the public hearing may be submitted by email to nlavier(a)kodiakak.us, faxed to 907 - 486 -9391, mailed or hand delivered to the Borough Clerk's Office, 710 Mill Bay Road, Room 101, Kodiak, AK 99615 prior to 5 p.m. on Thursday, April 7, 2011. All written comments submitted on this hearing shall become part of the public hearing record. PUBLIC HEARING FORM The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly will hold a public hearing on Thursday, April 7, 2011, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers to hear comments on: Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion Areas. ❑ This written argument is in support of the expansion area. ECEllWEB X This written argument is in opposition of the expansion area. � APR - 6201 1 Name: O :) lt_ ( rahk) � i I Residence Address: 3q 36) aps ( I •n•n I I •,' I CE Mailing Address: ` Th3 50 Comments: Z AAA 4604 - aJS7 CJ2- I 5 -11IC2_ Foe - 1 - 1-4'2- dz kA50005 . 1. CAI L6 4 L<1 1.)t1MCp 6 Lt1 It_ OP_kAJ v o' J D - i Y /A 0-5 or 4 ut✓» t, o- a-c wt44 14E COL - OK - SRC r 5 / u(7 f ( ....,4,2 1 E / IJGVE i' ?tS2 -M'7 A -re ,dc - ro TJrur fQa , D (A .) 6 us & J Z , j4 -i-1 t,£ E - Pots (J RAJ • ijaA ti >0 N(f I Mfl f 4 a-D %.11 , L,CY 4&'upQ 4J-'k4. G rt11 I) 1/4 7 . e,i2A1) 04 A 1 ,..1 Atic iE Da N/71 W 'Wt ,4Mb-rd -t= .z �2 ✓cK C s ,iu go ,4t,z $ A - 0 e 0,00 7 f/ A-LIZ£h-o‘( , 4- ■>o Nor » EC 7 J � - ‘ 72,4 - 5 't ,o r,F 7114.E. J JI ?r1C5 &R- tut( y's-e9 _ Ourz DI rcrf 5 ,+Ar0 y#(LD /9L r-DY � OG.L &LI rtDou(k( &,M' -34 - n2,45tL, /90 Fe- -t— l3f J5 LJ/L-L 6N< 1 1cf1cifEL.54-i '( ?e&&SA , T '/o (mob Written argument supporting or opposing the public hearing may be submitted by email to niavier(a�kodiakak.us, faxed to 907- 486 -9391, mailed or hand delivered to the Borough Clerk's Office, 710 Mill Bay Road, Room 101, Kodiak, AK 99615 prior to 5 p.m. on Thursday, April 7, 2011. All written comments submitted on this hearing shall become part of the public hearing record. 0 PUBLIC HEARING FORM The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly will hold a public hearing on Thursday, April 7, 2011, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers to hear comments on: Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion- Areas -- - - —_. �,�, 1H+ I '1 �' i �J. I i . L1 \ii it ❑ This wr argument is in support of the appeal. 1 i_1,� - --` t. ,7J This written argument is in opposition of the appeal. .1 ! 'II j t; ' (, , MAR 2 4 2011 Name: 2f s i 6. Ce � LA--- .J - Residence Address: x 9 20 G ©U�- -- �2 . .- J Mailing Address: 54- tA-1—, ,/ Comments: e9 1.._ a/t. r7u #a�py a// 7Z . G i 1 ft IQ 5 U /-v a 4 gaga /-lecitf-- Pr.. Q �' Co7/i V 2. / S/#ft 4 A A Gg� a ,tt tj t ED,S2,9 of raked (A2 ed Oki a u_22__ ..n -e.a_ Gou/uvt� -- - /_h.- o� ls-.p-ar.�— ( e 2 /,}-aevi, g41:7 . 1 n / (/ � _ raiu -f tee- /iota- t_7 /*> ou-� AP 1/kar 0 D !n-Q-- 297 D GS2-- /' � o it `l' Lam. i ._ _./ , a` ._< s CARX _sue . -, £?4 'oat. P1 _ city- 4 sic--ss 44- 1/17 A4 - e, /a q- 7 GAIL- -S u1 # . / 44 o- at., "- 7" N Written argument supporting or opposing the public hearing may be submitted by email to njavier(o�kodiakak.us, faxed to 907- 486 -9391, mailed or hand delivered to the Borough Clerk's Office, 710 Mill Bay Road, Room 101, Kodiak, AK 99615 prior to 5 p.m. on Thursday, April 7, 2011. All written comments submitted on this hearing shall become part of the public hearing record. _ -, c -E 11 w rci, - -, I. 0 b , D p ,; APR 7 2 01 1 i PUBLIC HEARING FORM 1 BOROUGH CLERK OFFICE 1 The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly will hold a public hearing on Thursday, April 7,2011, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers to hear comments on: Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion Areas. ❑ This written argument is in support of the appeal. CO This written argument is in opposition of the agyeef. pubU c hzzct r t r1 Name: _____Qhp it n Lim rtin Residence Address: � 3' 3 Etr't or Ot Mailing Address: ,32 Eici o r oi'" Comments: ' • a G •e.. • t• • - 'a — • <'nrk-e, nro ,Cnresa i turnn t,i5 ynix &lit 10e drt'' • chi bent pc -k-n u tnr hnmo6, ini 0rioill- '4-ho •'•I ' as a. •• •• a * "Ths a: l• • •s 4 • a it rn 'Win t C 8nrrtr 'En ,,ornc *horn , -nr* +n un on4t.r, n • TP 4n r,hnto "1/4 on i tS cIn t t r. hp n 4-1(i0 i ti t nd, . •f es . a • a - - • f: • • a • Di a+ At +Y19 6-k-re ok in `rho ,-ewi rn ) of i C O •' • ase a .'6' •• a •s - st - a•" • ',.s 1 hpr7lon1 n,,pr'S, 11 44w dtt per- houQ n i-rnn 5 &C n" in n. Written argument supporting or opposing the public hearing may be submitted by email to niavier(a kodiakak.us, faxed to 907 - 486 -9391, mailed or hand delivered to the Borough Clerk's Office, 710 Mill Bay Road, Room 101, Kodiak, AK 99615 prior to 5 p.m. on Thursday, April 7, 2011. All written comments submitted on this hearing shall become part of the public hearing record. - 42011D ff� APR 1 I PUBLIC HEARING FORM BOROUGH CLERK'S OFFICE The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly will hold a public hearing on Thursday, April 7, 2011, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers to hear comments on: Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion Areas. ❑ This written argument is in support of the appeal. ,`e This written argument is in opposition of the appeal. Name: On [q in. I p-e/ Residence Address: 3 D 1 �✓P�fti (7) s Nova Javier From: Red West [fishcoho ©gmail.comj s Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 4:05 PM To: Nova Javier Subject: This written argument is in support of the expansion of roll carts APR - 5 2011 J ! l Hello Nova and Borough Assembly, BOROUGH CLERK'S OFFICE Please get rid of as many dumpsters as you can. The dumpsters provide opportunity for bears and birds to get into trash 24 hours a day. As soon as a dumpster is emptied it starts filling up with trash within minutes. There is trash all around the dumpster and since Kodiak has become used to the trash it is accepted but unhealthy and unsightly. I pay $40.31 per month now and since I recycle and compost I produce one or less than one 15 gal bag per week. I would rather pay only $28.90 per month and continue to take my recycling to Threshold. I would like to have roll cart service at my house. No more dumpsters. Red West In memory of our neighbor of Okey Chandler ,A7 jp rt . uec.. Cap.. Road. 1 907 486 9897 KANA Kodiak Area Native Association 01:21:40 p.m. 03 -16 -2011 2/2 PUBLIC HEARING FORM The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly will hold a public hearing on Thursday, April 7, 2011, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers to hear comments on: Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion Areas__ This written argument is in support I n 1 V' ] 9 pp4rt of the 1 ❑ This written argument is in opposition of the appeal. ul �` I Name: /W j � 1 . MAR 1 6 201 I' � GlYR Cr ves� Xodh a..� L L - OFFICE Residence Address: � r t i BGRCU; +, CLERICS CIFi=10E Mailing Address: 5{ y\ Q_ `` Comments:Se�k- ‘k4 Ce141 V l `"QC l'7 UI I\c � U Written argument supporting or opposing the public hearing may be submitted by email to niavier(a)kodiakak.us, faxed to 907 -486 -9391, mailed or hand delivered to the Borough Clerk's Office, 710 Mill Bay Road, Room 101, Kodiak, AK 99615 prior to 5 p.m. on Thursday, April 7, 2011. All written comments submitted on this hearing shall become part of the public hearing record. 0 PUBLIC HEARING FORM The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly will hold a public hearing on Thursday, April 7, 2011, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers to hear comments on: Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion Areas. PP argument is in [M This written ar 9 PP { support of the appeal. � u7 pp 1; _ S �' , = h Il _ .-H i ❑ This written argument is in opposition of the appeal. ! , I I i MAR 2 4 2011 IL") Name: 61/00/1"- v ? X -/ M rc9h I - cLa Lay i l Residence Address: 3194 Ne -tia_ [Nay i PnPnl lia7 CA tR :{'S OFFICE Mailing Address: To BDV a570 Comments: 611.2 Jfc400K&i Pt Will Gut dds.wi m a-a Ow intJ4 b&Gu. `i d Plc U Bat (moo ee.... Mii i gate pie [kern ,%c .a ..� 'a Li � L.. .e / ie .. / a P G+� it•�r Leda .�.Y�arrz rtivtic ('� Written argument supporting or opposing the public hearing may be submitted by email to njavier faxed to 907- 486 -9391, mailed or hand delivered to the Borough Clerk's Office, 710 Mill Bay Road, Room 101, Kodiak, AK 99615 prior to 5 p.m. on Thursday, April 7, 2011. All written comments submitted on this hearing shall become part of the public hearing record. lit" :C;h��7ls 1- I Li i MAR 2 9 2011 -- /) PUBLIC HEARING FORM ' LOROUC'-I CLEliiif'v 0[ ICE j { -- - - - - - -- J The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly will'hold a public hearing on'Thursdav, April 7, 2011, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers to hear comments on: Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Service Expansion Areas. This written argument is in support of the appeal. ❑ This written argument is in opposition of the appeal. Name: M1 ,1e i- Ntc cAe S12.errran -- Residence Address: 331-10 1`'1e\n■ 1 we., Mailing Address: ?. 0- t, )DX LQ1 Comments: a. 5\Tc' flt1 1. FirIT - �- 'k e, ¥ O.nc,c sr Orr m o, du'mp'4e r in I 'm/ n i hbor\nood -I-) \ ndN\du1 cortio tnen . Pe op \e �}C\\V I \n m\/ dun-TA4e r are_ ve a e1 -s wer\oo.d' • ._ r -..t 1. ..0 a:is 1,114 a \ e n\A'n ONQN �- & i v ‘c ' . ' s. . . ,. ()Aso -s r \ ce ck Sn -1 i ndNCduals Loi-4 n t. 'as'. a e /1 •r'l•'a t.e ^r Q, ss st - .II t\ . . avSt:r I. \a" .at ■ U if a \ o x y r e o r r t a , i n e r • r. - e os of \etAccx , q •rirt e \ean -* Lp Acxv1 T. )?e nri .ve,ra - e CZC • • ..• It It I CO t• Is a ..1a • li C • e '•l se. I . - . r 00 0 . • e _ •teml. . it (Y .r ' 'pi , S - L\I tI . as U. • to k `he . du mps-\er: w C\ 5hc>urs - hrsix. h A-Nne dw psSef 16_11 : 1 i #1. it • CO.,/ I l 4- = A. ■01.• ■' 1.i•ei • 9,c, Wri e r� k upp in $ or o . e p } po in Ig r e 'pu. i. s .. gu e ea n. may be submitted by email to niaviert7a kodi ak.us, faxed to 907 -486- 91, mailed or hand de ivered to the Borough Clerk's Office, 710 Mill Bay Road, Room 101, Kodiak, AK 99615 prior to 5 p.m. on Thursday, April 7, 2011. All written comments submitted on this hearing shall become part of the public hearing record. Nova Javier From: Mary Barber Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 10:15 AM To: Nova Javier Sub FW: input for expansion of curbside pickup � Subject: P P P P I� s� �S fl U �S FYI...sent to me instead of you for the public hearing. APR 5 2011 M I IL-, Thanks. Mary J. Barber BOPOJL1 CLEF;!(' O FFI C E Engineering & Facilities Kodiak Island Borough (907) 486 -9343 / (907) 486 -9394 fax mbarberPkodiakak.us DD Original Message From: Kyle.W.Crow(duscg.mil [mailto:Kyle.W.CrowaPuscg.mil) Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 10:04 AM To: Mary Barber Subject: input for expansion of curbside pickup Mary, I have a schedule conflict that prevents me from attending the meeting on Wednesday April 6, 2011. However I would like to be on the record as objecting to the existing curbside pickup program and further expansion of it. I previously wrote my objections to the Borough Engineer. I have lived in Kodiak for approximately 15 years and currently work as an Environmental Protection Specialist for the US Coast Guard. I know that curbside containers are incompatible with frequent high winds, bears, dogs, eagles, rats, icy conditions, hilly and uneven surfaces, snow plowing and snow berms, seasonal darkness, large areas with limited parking, and other issues unique to the Kodiak community. I lived in Sitka for two years and have firsthand experience of the negative problems of curbside pickups and recycling. 1. Every summer numerous police officers and vehicles were frequently needed to cordon off areas where bears were being attracted to garbage. They would need to keep close watch on these bears to prevent tragic encounters with humans and their pets. There were unfortunate incidents where bears had to be killed by police, troopers, or residents. This resulted in higher costs in police man -hours and reduced their effectiveness in other areas. Parents had to pick up their children from school and special events versus letting them walk to and from, and joggers, walkers, and bicycle riders had to be "bear aware ". 2. Loose garbage and litter was everywhere in roadside ditches, in trees, bushes, parking spaces, on beaches, in the water, and in yards and lots. Mostly blown there after garbage cans were blown over by high winds, or when their lids were blown open. 3. It was not uncommon to see curbside cans so full that their lids couldn't be closed, with ravens pulling material out. 4. As in Sitka, recycling will not be widely supported here as long as it is difficult for residents to participate. Recycling will improve somewhat when recycling stations become more i accessible and user friendly. Sorting out, separating, storing, and managing multiple waste streams will only be practiced by a small percentage of the population. Larger cities collect all recyclable materials, combined as a single waste. Sorting occurs at final disposal facilities. While Kodiak will most likely never be able to afford this type of sorting equipment, perhaps bulk recyclables can be shipped off island for reuse. It stands to reason that recycling will be practiced by more people if made easy. Thank you Kyle Crow 410 West Rezanof Kodiak, Ak 99615 (907) 738 -9283 2 03/25/2011 07:28 9074864503 BOOK INC PAGE 01/01 TT U IL L A LL 6; MAR 2 5 2011 , PUBLIC HEARING FORM BORON _,'i CLERKS OFFICE The Kodiak Island Borough will hold a public hearing on Thursday. April 7.2011 at 7:30 p,m. In the Borough As Chambers to hear comments on: Direction to Proceed With the Alaska Waste Proposed Roll Cart Servibe Expansion Areas. L Thls writtenargument is in support of the appeal. This written argument is in'opposition of the appeal. Name: /t a-•40( Kap( v Residence Address: y' e n .'k I - 1 c ( Mailing Address: t Comments: D • 1 / I / - L I CAM .2.r� * . A/)c ' t. to 4L, /Mei - C' a,nL a'a ni+C:P ci @ . , ' k wLc Qc err�q 1 s CCr ~ SD6A -1, • Go L, 0. .1 ,,e;0 '1 c 4s err Y4 61 Z' . - � - � • r� ,� r. i ^' � tip ,r4+. . ,��' '� ' • L� -..�� . / ! -a! s • r 1 . , 1 .. 2 I C agg.., / /i — is VS. r Gr✓u 0anDi w�OL. cS A - 02494 c/t mrs ai . .1-r) • e 46 eiz� I r,--&.enne , &cvi '1 cdriccid Er i4 (t` + a c,t C o'-c a S i u c Pre , Z9n s eteC CE.e • Written argument supporting or opposing the public hearing may be submitted by.. email to niavier(thkodiakak -us, faxed to. 907- 486- 9391, mailed or hand ,delivered to the Borough Clerk's. Office, 710 Mill Bay Road, Room 1o1, Kodiak, AK 99615 prior to 5 p.m. on Thursday, April 7, 2011. All written comments submitted on this hearing shall become part of the public hearing record. • Nova Javier From: Meagan C r 2 2 Sent: Monday, Maarcch 21, 2011 8:14 AM ( x To: Rick Gifford; Nova Javier Subject: FW: Online Form Submittal: General Inquiry /Comment/Complaint Form This came in via the website... Original Message From: supportPcivicplus.com Finailto:support @civicplus.comj Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2011 3:18 PM To: Meagan Christiansen Subject: Online Form Submittal: General Inquiry /Comment /Complaint Form The following form was submitted via your website: General Inquiry /Comment /Complaint Form Name:: Karen Lee Address:: Box 306 City:: Kodiak State: : Alaska Zip:: 99615 Home Phone Number:: 486 -4860 Daytime Phone Number:: 654 4860 Email Address:: kdlee@gci.net Please Specify Your General Inquiry, Comments or Complaint:: I would like to express my dismay over Alaska Waste's most recent attempt to set up curbside garbage in the borough. I live on Parkside Dr. Myself and 5 of my neighbors all have long steep driveways. Mine is 200 feet. There is no way I will be able to drag a trash can up my hill...especially in winter. I can barely get up it with four wheel drive and studded tires, let alone drag a trash can up and down it. Sometimes there is a foot of snow and just two narrow ruts. In addition to that there is no place to put the can if I could get it up there. There is no curb. The road edge and my property blend as one and in the winter the road grader pushes snow creating a huge berm that I would have to lift the can over leaving it impossible for the A.W.'s truck to pick it up. I couldn't leave the can on the outside of the berm. It would be in the roadway. I remember A.W. offering to come get my trash for a fee. This is also unacceptible. I'm 65 and would consider this age discrimination. Plus, I really don't want them stuck in my driveway.I must not be punished for being old and having a steep driveway. And remember, I'm not the only one on this road with the same issues. What ever happened to the transfer stations we were suppose to get? Right now I see lots of good usable material being left next to the dumpsters and people are picking it up and repurposing it. That's what the transfer stations should be for. I contend that this hole new push by A.W. is just another effort to get a bigger contract and higher rates out of us. It certainly isn't designed to help the public re- cycle. Please seriously consider my concerns, Karen Lee, Parkside Dr. Additional Information: 1 f ' Sidney G. Pruitt Jr. PO Box 395 Kodiak, Alaska 9 IL; Phone: 486 -3330 Resident since 1973,1 3328�Monashka/Bay ILJ , , I To: Kodiak Island Borough Assembly 1.1 MAR 1 4 2011 , arc To: 9, 2011 710 Mill Bay Rd. Kodiak, Alaska 99615 p K'S OFFICE BOROUGH , CLE.,.,.� ,,, 1.,E Regarding: Garbage: Extended Cart Service by Alaska Waste: I am writing because I will be out of town March 17. During your next public hearing on this issue. Apparently you did not listen during the other 6 meetings where people testified No! To garbage cart service. It seems only last Winter, Spring and Summer we decided this Garbage Cart service agenda for Island lake, Spruce Cape, Woodland Acres, Monashka Bay and Service district one. We: The Public and the Assembly decided to keep our Dumpster Service until transfer stations could be installed. Why? Because of the 1. Kodiak Bears we have in Kodiak. 2. The Severe weather we have in Kodiak. With high winds, snow and ice. 3. No Curb sides in most areas for curbside service. 4. Narrow roads and limited assess to lots and residences 5. No Storage of Garbage around your house for a week. 6. No rats, dogs or birds digging into or living around stored trash. 7. Un- Negotiable terrain, with long steep driveways and winding hills. 8. And, Most People plainly do not want to deal with Garbage Carts. 9. We like the Dumpsters. They make since. Why? Because: a. The Garbage comes to you. You do not have to go and collect it. b. It is Convenient. Get rid of it as you please. Every day. c. It should be cheaper; one man one dumpster one neighbor one day. Instead of one robot truck one robot driver and one house at a time. All Day long. During all the meetings and work sessions that started last March lasting through June 2010, the people as I recall said no to curb side cart service. I personally attended 3 work sessions and 3 regular Assembly meetings (that lasted until 10:00 and 11:00 PM) testifying giving my views on cart service, bears, recycling, sorting trash and saving the dump :v Please abort this mission and reconsideration of extended Garbage Cart Service. We have fought this fight we have discussed it for hours Days and Months. A deal is a deal. Is your word and commitment worth anything? Or will the dump savers and recyclers continue to press the issue until people are not looking enough and this process slips under the wire? That is what happened to the Pool and High School issues. First the people said NO, Than No again and than when all were not looking, Bam you guys (the Borough Assembly) allowed the issues to be pressed. Than guess what, the Pool and High school were approved. 1 Now you are on a Money Hunt, raising property values (again), raising mill rates (again) trying to figure out HOW WE 12,000 residents of Mayberry are going to pay for big ideas with shallow pockets. If the people want this curb side cart service let them have it. Why not ask them individually? Put a questionnaire or Ballot in each bill or invoice sent out, have them returned with payment and counted by a non partial committee. (I will help count.) Do you want Garbage Cart service in your area or Dumpsters? Just to remind you of my stand on garbage cart service and recycling. I do not want garbage cart service. I like the dumpsters. It will not work where 1 live, because of the Bears, Wind, Snow and my steep driveway that dumps on to Monashka Bay Hwy on a blind curve. There is physically no place to safely put any garbage container at the road side of my property for garbage truck pickup. I do not want to separate trash. I do not have time for it. It is just trash to me. I believe that recycling in Kodiak is not economically practical because There are no recycle or reclamation centers near enough to make it work. Every thing except bears, snow and wind has to be shipped in or out. of this island. Suggestion: Separate glass, metals and PVC baring plastics and Burn it. Why not incinerate? Or Natural Decomposition: Stop bailing and mix decomposable materials with soil, hurry it than rotate it periodically. In order to reduce volume? Ordinance of Significant Importance: On another note. I Sid Pruitt Jr. Request that the Kodiak Island Borough Assembly adopts an ordinance that stops issues of Significant Importance from reoccurring. And being voted on again and again until they pass. I am tired of attending meetings where the public majority voice their opinions, ideas and needs, saying the same thing over and over, and you just do not listen. Such as the Pool and High School and this BS Garbage Issue. Once the public has spoken (via Public Hearings) and it is discussed (by the Assembly) than voted on and decided. It should be a done deal. The issue should be dead. It should not be allowed on any agenda, for at least 2 years, with out a Super Majority Vote of the Assembly. The topic should not be allowed time for discussion. With out this Super Majority approval. (Super Majority being 80 - 100 %). Stop wasting time and allowing special interests to chip away until they get their way. Thank You: „. Sidney G. Pr itt Jr. Nova Javier Fr From: Marion Owen [mygarden©alaska.net] Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 10:03 AM To: Nova Javier a - Subject: Comments in support of expansion of roll cart service D S .� C V [� 1 la April 5, 2011 ii APR 7 2011 I This written argument is in support of the expansion area L BOROUGH CLERK'S OFFICE Name: Marion Owen Residence and mailing address: 1223 W Kouskov Comments: While I don't live in the area within the proposed expansion area, I fell I am affected by the decision since we ALL directly "connected" to the landfill and solid waste issues. I support the proposed extension of curbside pickup in Kodiak for the following reasons: 1. Dumpsters are expensive and wasteful (as stated in the Solid Waste Management Plan). Thanks to the new curbside pickup routine involving standard -sized roll carts, Kodiak, for the first time, has good, solid data about many aspects of the community's waste stream. For example: Households using roll carts throw out about 35 pounds of trash per week. Households using dumpsters throw out over 60 pounds per week. That's almost twice the amount of garbage. 2. Curbside pickup embraces the Pay -As- You -Throw (PAYT) rate structure, a scheme which is embraced nationwide as a means to encourage individual responsibility and fair rates for garbage handling. 3. Our neighborhoods look cleaner, thanks to public relations efforts, the new "Garbage Cop" position filled by the borough and Alaska Waste's continued efforts to educate and work with its customers. 4. Finally, replacing neighborhood dumpsters as much as possible and practical is necessary before setting up transfer stations. I am confident that members of the Borough Assembly will act in support of the mandate voted on a couple years ago: A diversion rate [of solid waste going to the landfill] of 25 percent by 2012 and 50 percent by 2020. Respectfully yours, Marion Owen Kodiak resident since 1984 1 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH AGENDA STATEMENT APRIL 7, 2011 REGULAR MEETING ITEM NO: 9.B TITLE: Ordinance No. FY2011 -13 Rezoning a Portion of Tract B -1A, U.S. Survey 4947 (Near Island ) From C- Conservation To PL- Public Use Zone. SUMMARY: The Borough has combined an existing lot on Near Island with additional land that was acquired from the City of Kodiak. This new lot will house the existing KFRC Research Facility and Scientist Housing. The additional land will also house the proposed ADF &G Facility. The land acquired from the City is zoned C- Conservation. The parcel that it has been incorporated into is zoned PL- Public Use Lands. The desire is to have the entire lot be zoned PL- Public Use Lands which allows offices for local, state, and federal governments. After holding a public meeting, the Commission unanimously approved recommending to the Borough Assembly that this entire parcel be rezoned from C- Conservation to PL— Public Use Lands. Four public hearing notices were sent out and any notices returned will be provided to the Assembly. FISCAL NOTES: Account No.: N/A Amount Budgeted: N/A Expenditure Required: N/A APPROVAL FOR AGENDA: dd< , �, RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to adopt Ordinance No. FY2011 -13. 1 Introduced by: Borough Manager 2 Requested by: CDD Director 3 Drafted by: CDD Director 4 Introduced: 03/17/2011 5 Public Hearing: 6 Adopted: 7 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH 8 ORDINANCE NO. FY2011 -13 9 10 AN ORDINANCE OF THE ASSEMBLY OF THE KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH REZONING 11 A PORTION OF TRACT B -1A, U.S. SURVEY 4947 (NEAR ISLAND) FROM 12 C- CONSERVATION TO PL- PUBLIC USE ZONE 13 14 WHEREAS, the Borough has acquired vacant land on Near Island from the City of Kodiak 15 in an effort to locate a new ADF &G Administrative facility in the same location as other 16 fisheries oriented institutional facilities and to continue the concept of a Research Campus 17 on Near Island; and 18 19 WHEREAS, this City of Kodiak land has been incorporated into an existing Borough 20 parcel by subdivision to make one large tract of land; and 21 22 WHEREAS, this larger parcel is the home of the existing Kodiak Fisheries Research 23 Facility (KFRC), scientist housing and with this addition of land, the proposed ADF &G 24 Facility; and 25 26 WHEREAS, the land acquired from the City of Kodiak is zoned C- Conservation while the 27 existing Borough owned lot is zoned PL— Public Use Lands; and 28 29 WHEREAS, good planning practice is to prohibit the "split lot zoning" or duo zoning for an 30 individual lot because of the differing uses permitted in each of the zoning districts; and 31 32 WHEREAS, the commission held properly noticed public hearings on this request and is 33 recommending that the Assembly find that a rezone of a portion of lot Tract B -1A from C- 34 Conservation to PL— Public Use Zone is in keeping with the guidance and objectives of the 35 2008 Comprehensive Plan. 36 37 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE ASSEMBLY OF THE KODIAK ISLAND 38 BOROUGH that the following parcel be rezoned from C- Conservation to PL- Public Use 39 Zone: 40 41 Section 1: This ordinance is not of general application and shall not be codified. 42 43 Section 2: A portion of Tract B - 1A, U.S. Survey 4947 be rezoned from C Conservation to 44 PL- Public Use lands to make the entire lot a consistent zoning district. 45 Kodiak Island Borough Ordinance No. FY2011 -13 Page 1 of 2 46 Section 3: The findings of the Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission 47 are hereby confirmed as follows: 48 49 17.205.020 A. Findings as to need and justification for a change or 50 amendments: 51 A rezone of Tract B -1A United States Survey 4947 removes the administrative 52 ambiguity that arises due to a "split -lot zoning" configuration. 53 A rezone of Tract B -1A United States Survey 4947 exemplifies good planning 54 practices. 55 56 17.205.020 B. Findings as to the effect a change or amendment would have on 57 the objectives of the comprehensive plan: 58 A rezone of Tract B -1A United States Survey 4947 is fully compatible with the 59 objectives of the Kodiak Island Borough 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update. 60 A rezone of Tract B -1A United States Survey 4947 is generally consistent with 61 the objectives of the 1987 Near Island Comprehensive Development Plan. 62 63 17.205.020 C. Recommendations as to the approval or disapproval of the 64 change or amendment: 65 The Kodiak Island Borough Planning & Zoning Commission recommends that 66 the Kodiak Island Borough Assembly approve the rezone of that portion of 67 Tract B -1A United States Survey 4947 currently zoned C - Conservation 68 Zoning District to PL- Public Use Zoning District. 69 70 ADOPTED BY THE ASSEMBLY OF THE KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH 71 THIS DAY OF 2011 72 73 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH 74 75 76 77 ATTEST: Jerome M. Selby, Borough Mayor 78 79 80 81 Nova M. Javier, MMC, Borough Clerk Kodiak Island Borough Ordinance No. FY2011 -13 Page 2 of 2 PUBLIC HEARING FORM Ordinance No. FY2011 -13 Rezoning a Portion of Tract B -1A, U.S. Survey 4947 (Near Island ) From C- Conservation To PL- Public Use Zone. This is in support of the rezone. ❑ This is in opposition of the rezone. ❑ Other comments. Name: � � I M135 I l A L /o Lc) 6Kr , Q,Z / f A4A C9Ll%� Residence Address: I � /� Mailing. Address: i2 zy or 1 c4JAM 1- 10•Hu-L- 6AI )<17 Comments: 1 fk6 ( amity S uPPoR16 !X, 23 Cull Written comments may be submitted by email to njavier fax to 907 486 - 9391, mail or hand delivered to the Borough Clerk's Office, 710 Mill Bay Road, Room 101, Kodiak, AK 99615 prior to .5 p.m. on Thursday, April 7, 2011. 7'` Kodiak Island Borough _ Office of the Borough Clerk 710 Mill Bay Road Nt Oft ' Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Phone (907) 486 -9310 Fax (907) 486 -9391 njavier@kodiakak.us NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING A public hearing will be held on Thursday, April 7, 2011, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska before the Kodiak Island Borough Assembly to hear comments on: Ordinance No. FY2011 -13 Rezoning a Portion of Tract B -1A, U.S. Survey 4947 (Near Island ) From C- Conservation To PL- Public Use Zone. If you do not wish to testify verbally, you may provide your comments in the attached public hearing form and fax it to (907) 486 -9391, Email to nlavierAkodiakak.us or hand deliver to the Borough Clerk's Office, 710 Mill Bay Road, Room 101, Kodiak, AK 99615 prior to 5 p.m. on April 7, 2011. Comments favoring and opposing are encouraged. If you have any questions, please call 486 -9310. Attachments: • Public hearing form • Map • Ordinance No. FY2011 -13. PUBLIC HEARING FORM Ordinance No. FY2011 -13 Rezoning a Portion of Tract B -1A, U.S. Survey 4947 (Near Island ) From C- Conservation To PL- Public Use Zone. ❑ This is in support of the rezone. ❑ This is in opposition of the rezone. ❑ Other comments. Name: Residence Address: Mailing Address: Comments: Written comments may be submitted by email to niavier(a kodiakak.us, fax to 907- 486 -9391, mail or hand delivered to the Borough Clerk's Office, 710 Mill Bay Road, Room 101, Kodiak, AK 99615 prior to 5 p.m. on Thursday, April 7, 2011. Ordinance al FY2014t� Rezoning a Portion CO Tract B -1A, Nom, 4947 VDT Island D Erom 0- Conservation gA PL-Public Nap Zone. \ 1,--* / Stift) / 40 _____ , -A i / l _c /--- , (7 Legend j I V /1(10 Subject Parcel] � O a a I f` / / , Kodiak Island Borough GIS Syste ..t. -e W E 1611 � ice '�i,�p 0 437.5 875 1 750 2,625 3,500 ` S Feet S Pis mapwas prepared from We Kodiak Island acreage's GIS System. It is pivided tor tre purpose of snowirg the general lot ae on of a property within the Kodiak Island Borough Ills map does not represent a swey. More infoonatlon about the mapping data can be datai by rmtacting the Kodiak island Borough II Departmert at (907) 406 -9333 1 Introduced by: Borough Manager 2 Requested by: CDD Director 3 Drafted by: CDD Director 4 Introduced: 03/17/2011 5 Public Hearing: 6 Adopted: 7 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH 8 ORDINANCE NO. FY2011 -13 9 10 AN ORDINANCE OF THE ASSEMBLY OF THE KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH REZONING 11 A PORTION OF TRACT B -1A, U.S. SURVEY 4947 (NEAR ISLAND) FROM 12 C- CONSERVATION TO PL- PUBLIC USE ZONE 13 14 WHEREAS, the Borough has acquired vacant land on Near Island from the City of Kodiak 15 in an effort to locate a new ADF &G Administrative facility in the same location as other 16 fisheries oriented institutional facilities and to continue the concept of a Research Campus 17 on Near Island; and 18 19 WHEREAS, this City of Kodiak land has been incorporated into an existing Borough 20 parcel by subdivision to make one large tract of land; and 21 22 WHEREAS, this larger parcel is the home of the existing Kodiak Fisheries Research 23 Facility (KFRC), scientist housing and with this addition of land, the proposed ADF &G 24 Facility; and 25 26 WHEREAS, the land acquired from the City of Kodiak is zoned C- Conservation while the 27 existing Borough owned lot is zoned PL— Public Use Lands; and 28 29 WHEREAS, good planning practice is to prohibit the "split lot zoning" or duo zoning for an 30 individual lot because of the differing uses permitted in each of the zoning districts; and 31 32 WHEREAS, the commission held properly noticed public hearings on this request and is 33 recommending that the Assembly find that a rezone of a portion of lot Tract B -1A from C- 34 Conservation to PL— Public Use Zone is in keeping with the guidance and objectives of the 35 2008 Comprehensive Plan. 36 37 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE ASSEMBLY OF THE KODIAK ISLAND 38 BOROUGH that the following parcel be rezoned from C- Conservation to PL- Public Use 39 Zone: 40 41 Section 1: This ordinance is not of general application and shall not be codified. 42 43 Section 2: A portion of Tract B -1A, U.S. Survey 4947 be rezoned from C- Conservation to 44 PL- Public Use lands to make the entire lot a consistent zoning district. 45 Kodiak Island Borough Ordinance No. FY2011 -13 Page 1 of 2 46 Section 3: The findings of the Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission 47 are hereby confirmed as follows: 48 49 17.205.020 A. Findings as to need and justification for a change or 50 amendments: 51 A rezone of Tract B -1A United States Survey 4947 removes the administrative 52 ambiguity that arises due to a "split -lot zoning" configuration. 53 A rezone of Tract B -1A United States Survey 4947 exemplifies good planning 54 practices. 55 56 17.205.020 B. Findings as to the effect a change or amendment would have on 57 the objectives of the comprehensive plan: 58 A rezone of Tract B -1A United States Survey 4947 is fully compatible with the 59 objectives of the Kodiak Island Borough 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update. 60 A rezone of Tract B -1A United States Survey 4947 is generally consistent with 61 the objectives of the 1987 Near Island Comprehensive Development Plan. 62 63 17.205.020 C. Recommendations as to the approval or disapproval of the 64 change or amendment: 65 The Kodiak Island Borough Planning & Zoning Commission recommends that 66 the Kodiak Island Borough Assembly approve the rezone of that portion of 67 Tract B -1A United States Survey 4947 currently zoned C - Conservation 68 Zoning District to PL- Public Use Zoning District. 69 70 ADOPTED BY THE ASSEMBLY OF THE KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH 71 THIS DAY OF 2011 72 73 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH 74 75 76 77 ATTEST: Jerome M. Selby, Borough Mayor 78 79 80 81 Nova M. Javier, MMC, Borough Clerk Kodiak Island Borough Ordinance No. FY2011 -13 Page 2 of 2 UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH CITY OF KODIAK 910 YUKON DR, #106 710 MILL BAY RD P.O. BOX 1397 FAIRBANKS, AK 99775 KODIAK, AK 99615 KODIAK, AK 99615 MARINE CENTER LLC 9757 GREENWOOD AVE. N. SEATTLE, WA 98103 Kodiak. Island Borough, Alaska .PROPERTY APPRAISAL. INFORMATION 2011 ' . Entitles Values PROPERTY 22645 R 09/10/2009 OWNER ID MARINE CENTER LLC 1 100% IMPROVEMENTS 0 Legal Description 151867 C/O FINNEY, NEILL 8 CO., P.S. CITY 100% LAND MARKET + 600,100 MARINE CENTER TR A 9757 GREENWOOD AVE. N. OWNERSHIP SEATTLE, WA 98103 OVER 100% MARKET VALUE = 600,100 100.00% PRODUCTIVITY LOSS - 0 APPRAISED VALUE = 600,100 R1602000031 ACRES: 2.5000 111111111111111111111111111 111 HS CAP LOSS - 0 SITUS 197 TRIDENT WAY KODIAK, AK 99615 APPR VAL METHOD: Cost ASSESSED VALUE = 600,100 _ 4GENERAL'� _ EXEMPTIONS . UTILITIES LAST APPR. TOPOGRAPHY LAST APPR. YR ROAD ACCESS LAST INSP. DATE ZONING RB NEXT INSP. DATE NEXT REASON SKETCH COMMANDS ' REMARKS ,. ' -. BUILDING'PERMITS ISSUE DT PERMIT TYPE PERMIT AREA ST PERMIT VAL SALE DT PRICE GRANTOR DEED INFO 01/05/2009 CITY OF KODIAK QD / 2009 / 00023 %: - 100 " .00 / `_ : a. IMPROVEMENT. "INFORMATION - -' ' - - . - IMPROVEMENT-FEATURES SUBD: MARCTR ". 100.00 % ' NBHD CITY. "� I# TYPE DESCRIPTION MTHD CLASS /SUBCL AREA UNIT PRICEUNITS BUILT EFF YR COND. VALUE DEPR PHYS ECON FUNC COMP ADJ ADJ VALUE . SUBD:.MARCTR 100.00 -'NBHD CITY - <100.00% 2,,,.. ' '' LAND INFORMATION �IRR wells 0 Capacity. 0`' -iRR acres 0 - ' 'al wells 0- ' ... NS CE _.. VA MASS _ .. _ LP DESCRIPTION CLS TABLE � HS METH DIMENSIONS UNIT PRICE GROSS VALUE ADJ MASS ADJ VAL SRC MKT VAL AG APPLY AG CLASS AG TABLE AG UNIT PRC AG VALUE 1. VAC RB NISL N SO 109,113 4400 SQ 5.50 600,100 1.00 1.00 A 600,100 0.00 0 PLAT 2009 -1 CREATING MARINE CENTER TR A 8 B AND NEAR ISLAND RESEARCH PARK LT 1A 600,100 0 Page 1 of 1 Effective Date of Appraisal: January 1 Date Printed: 03/21/2011 11 by ASCLR2 True Automation, Inc. Public Hearing Item 7 - D P &Z February 16, 2011 Location Request: Rezone, according y177do VZIDEtnx•J9�79 0 � c � op rezone Eaefl @Daportion (SWAP B -1A, C}�/4947t p C:3E el 4)0 C- ConservationtbPL- Public Q/gt to order GOEll (tom Kodiak Island Borough eventual development oC(jpleX� 7Alaska Department c g e Game off ice EGI';I research building (I; ID located CRAG sametteg Agent: Robert Seholze existing Kodiak Fisheries Research (g -1,4 , o�' � ire o °';�`!� Pte' r 2 nht � � � / -,•-''' ' 41:er / r) 4 49 f i k , , __,, ___, :iv yiiiiiII2 * 7 (7 f / (17- I Legend Subject Parcel , 0 o o / / r / / a te ° - Kodiak Island Borough GIS System � ;� E �� W � ' � 0 437.5 875 1,750 2,625 3,500 Feet S This map was prepared from the Kodiak Island Borough's GIS System. It is provided for the purpose of showing the general location of a property within the Kodiak Island Borough. This map does not represent a survey. More information about the mapping data can be obtained by contacting the Kodiak Island Borough IT Department at (907) 486-9333. Case No. 11 -019 Introduction Page 1 of 6 k , ✓o i e e „Vo�� Public Hearing Item 7 - D P &Z February 16, 2011 -w : , Kodiak Island Borough Zoning Map W . Community Development Department (Zoning Reg uest: Q Rezone, according QC) gp('-.c, yID1Mgt) aid yl7 o P g ease099 -019 Qjo rezone P . am portion CQSIU IB- 1A,QQg, &UMW nit G-- Conservation RD PL- Public Qtn11:J ft, to order aDEMZIVING Kodiak Island Borough eventual development emi srmlaskaDepartmentCQlr$�(3 Agent: Robert Schoize office aid research buildingQpt located lgae same Qo�,tmQCCO existing Kodiak Fisheries Research @gilta ' 4 r�� � ' © ` Vc ' T�� i 405 t Fee ' 1,620 ij �� te �� t� � �� r r I r r 1 Feet �,6& .,_e+�©� if j � 40 1111" .0111 � „ / 1 104 0 ,....., a , , / Subject Portion .. ` 1 3 Zoning Legend Public Use Lands I Rural Residential 1 Multi Family Residential E 1 Light Industrial raj Watershed I I Rural Residential 2 _ Business I I Rural Neighborhood Commercial Conservation Single Family Residential I Retail Business ' _ I Urban Neighborhood Commercial Rural Residential I Two Family Residential I I Industrial Natural Use This map was prepared from the Kodiak Island Borough's GIS System. It is provided for the purpose of showing the general location of a property within the Kodiak Island Borough. This map does not represent a survey. More information about the mapping data can be obtained by contacting the Kodiak Island Borough IT Department at (907) 486 Case No. 11 -019 Introduction Page 3 of 6 k O , ?e, 0 0 0 0 9 • ? . Public Hearing Item 7 - D P &Z February 16, 2011 Image Overlay Request: GI Rezone, accordingp�p © gl77 glfl�r. i.lghJa (tje rezone el MOM portion �Q B 1 A , pl�,✓, v 4947puxG1 p t:3E ease 0 99�41fl C- Gonservation Publ um, �ilorderQ��o�i7p� Kodiak Island Borough eventual developmentde)6S3u7Alaska D epartment[o f M QGame office 1•II research building Q)C•Xa located Cra - EEG pmpxa Agent: Robert Seholze existing Kodiak Fisheries Research Cow � x � to �,'f �� �i g`�+ } /" sti * `'e r 3.1/ 'fi t., }� r et p t 4 [ • r `i`i t 0 J 4 3" � t , s '. �>; � t 't ;eG7 t :::',. y s .,,,g it �'� f Vi . t t y l it f $t S,M r i (. u '� � { r9'yWi' . G.7 F ' a S, 1"'i y J w � 3 A j II; � t t i ',--0"" f r r 4 :' �+' 3 ,, r 4 wa f J ltK`t,�l,J r: C � tq, ,, ,,,i 2 , wi yj, M1 z �.,i r ! 1 t' f e , � � i AY3 • n 1z , sal' . .4 �, :'-‘1t a ■ r~ n` 1 44 ; > .. w(� f 1 . , ui 4 ° 9 ' , CI- v i s r . 7s ! Y''t rt a .47. A ti r 1(, 1 /Q t ' Zi f ki' 1-� y r 3 f , + '434 ,„ x ° y t v ` j t t I y i d t + f � y .)Hh .` [ !;k '. .".‘"‘P r -. ' ' t,' c .. r.'4 "1 y y L. E:a W i � I iy �' ," .',* / ¢f l + tr}ir � a g r 1 1,, 0 `A .. t t 5 , o ld# sC % w , ' ' .j Ik ' 1 ' N — ,, As-, r' ' x [ J �z {t � 'i t , 1 4 R •' r / . r Holy t _ 2. rf #. �1 ' fi , piy�p r �,. .1y d g . 1 , � .I r i -, :; 1�' v J 41%i z -.y�ti , /.,4-4 T9 - L 4 A s }.: ,(e " t +".- tl' to y f'X� J • f t`^ ' t' , tit 4 : 1 ! r ,,,{ r t o .xit c t L 11 >f "' " Fl 4 . r v • T i� f .tx p 1✓ _ t ? ," " 1\ If/ w . ' y Y t M1 : {• w' tt 7‘,„,....,,,,rit-Iii....-- , + P ai ! t£ 3 ' t "' .' r ' ' � 't ; ' � , . .c t . � n S E �" 'Y1 `I V �, y 'le yti+.+ . t t f J- , Sf4 � , [ , f i '1` ?r;�r�' „..4,s--,- ja a'� ei .. t ° ' :: :fi �� . f r��,� � u � t x { ' 4 r A ��➢ , ; ar l r .yy ,}'M”, ya.,..;!;.4'1;:,?, �J ,�t �. 1 ' t, * 4 a ; ..; , �, „a .. .y fi g. r ` r. ' ` t t C , ,r .t) 3 ." ,e 'd 1d "F .1 f G, t ," '01. ``,# w': 0 1 f9 " �+7 S' r t � 1 "! v't ` t ,,,( t ,<4F 4 :4„ tl tom,'' .:".• S" a f : % [ i �U f� � � r , r'JJ f `�„';,Y :s. � 3 }X z✓ r � p lk T r I Y L f 1� e N / `'a" w t4 - fl ' i t ff.::4 %)1r s X3 i , - ��� t d 3. gr. . 4;,,,r,,„_3/4).3/4,-;1';? � ,...;-.---c-,1)''' �. .n, C- ' �' jt c c ! e .1 w .x r i 4 ., - pp t ' " ;;;0-1; f P«r -. t' y.( ° .. y}},4° a. i� pi i 4 " A-- ..„, ..,..,,„ ,14' . • J itrA ,,,, Y 3 ` a t ,i, [ ,: ..1-..,[17,-,.;- : v a v fie. .. f ll S:.% ,.{:+ �, r T r ..., s -• , .. " :F.-, ACC,- 4'4. -4 ' t r1lfi , ,41- /•. 4 45: :. f F w!' f e k t - 1 r ilit 4mm , � �4 iP i .f 4t s t r m y � W. . + v r, p '!'1 l Ilert _ f yy '47,-411 ry 4r• :R,',e r f ir i %. a 2 ^� .sr .. �� ti2' ._ , N . Kodiak Island Borough GIS System 41 17 4 : 111 1 1 1/40, 0 112.5 225 450 675 900 J Feet S hin the Kodiak Island Borough ' This map was prepared from the Kodiak Island Boroughs GIS System. It is provided for the purpose of showing the general location of a property wit This map does not represent a survey More information about the mapping data can be obtaine b y co ntacting the Kodiak Island Borough IT Geparument at (907)486 9333 Case No. 11 -019 Introduction Page 5 of 6 * o ee, 0 �o� Public Hearing Item 7 - D P &Z February 16, 2011 710 Mill Bay Rd., Room 205, KODIAK, AK 99615.8398 (907) 486 -9363 - FAX (907) 486 -9396 www.kib.co.kodiak.ak.us Applicant Information Property Information k iobi4 K IS LA 0.11 -, a! ��( 2 0v ' /J Property ID Number /s Property owner's name 710 1,u_ 8 /20 MO- in- e -hi jSs H14/7 Legal Description c-1/34 rev T IP. ✓, Property owner's mailing address eMisic- ale- 146 Current Zoning: C ^ ( Ort)c /2, 671 e City /\ State Zip Applicable Comprehensive Plan:. A/2, - eI 3 0 Li Year of Plan adoption: Home phone Work Phone E -mail Addr. Present Use of Property: 0 cA AST" i4Lze, peccuacp M6a+T oleok Agent's name (If applicable) (SSE Agent's mailing address Proposed Use of Property: City State Zip A 0 f 6 . P /9 GI L fry o,v SA - ,Lo r 45 k Fief. Home phone Work Phone E -mail Addr. • (Note: Use additional sheets, if needed, to provide a complete description of the proposed request.) Applicant Certification I hereby certify as the property owner /authorized agent that this application for Planning and Zoning Commission review Is true and complete to the best of my knowledge and that it Is submitted in accordance with the requirements of the applicable Kodiak Island Borough Code, which Includes a detailed site plan' for variance and conditional use requests and which may Include optional supporting documentation as Indicated below. _ Additional Narrative/History _ As -built Survey _ Photographs _ Maps Other Property Owner's Sign u 1 4 Date A honied Agent's i nature 2 Da Aicrt > ' A development plan for one or more lots on which is shown the existing and proposed conditions of the lot, including topography, vegetation, drainage, flood plains, wetlands, and waterways; landscaping and open spaces; walkways; means of ingress and egress; circulation; utility services; structures and buildings; signs and lighting; berms, buffers, and screening devices; surrounding development; and any other information that reasonably may be required in order that an Informed decision can be made by the approving authority. (Source: The New Illustrated Book of Development Definitions, 01993 by Rutgers University) STAFF USE ONLY / PAYMENT VERIFICATION Code Section(s) Involved: 1 r 2- 1 - ) J ( I-, 1 30 y 3o - C? 2. - 4 CA -1 / 1 -5 U / Pigott YLLL '7_SC f N ") *Zoning Change, Variance (KIBC 17.66.020) $250.00 • Fee Schedule: Conditional Use Permit (KIBC 17.67.020.B) 5250.00 - (per MB Assembly Resolution Other (appearance requests, site pllp review, etc.) $150.00 Eft. July 1, 2005) V) Zoning change from C to /- (KIBC 17.72.030 and 030.C)* q 5 1 Lcssln 1.75 acres 8350.00 2 '� t 76 to ha 5.00 acres 5750.00 4 Application received by: / / ' <✓ SA1 to 40.00 acres 51,000.00 ` ' - 40.01 acres or more 51,5110.00 Staff signature I I fl` Q Case No. 11 -019 Application Page 1 of 3 Public Hearing Item 7 - D P &Z February 16, 2011 ■ 0. °� r� s "< TRACT A ..,..a :..`.. / VC lie Salta St V Se, NOT H. / r az , Ien or le SPILIJCE It OW C. 218 / MTh ea .Weer ".o. ,. . I 4 . / / B -2 k . REMAINDER I , + US. S. 4947 / / / / 1 a / P io 1 �4 a,aJ : c / . B -1 • SCALE IF 5 v ,4, 151 01/4- J � s <:. , �5 y 4 / o 6 1 + i `� i Ft � to. m TRA ib t\ Sways yr AL '... v \ cs` �Q asernav m ..,. Aua.a rM b , ` � ii , ur.,.<,.w .rwxr..artmn o "' 4 4 L. 4.4 + '' 4 TR F ,/ Case No. 11 -019 Application Page 2 of 3 Public Hearing Item 7 - D � , YY 1 P &Z February 16, 2011 y l ,t lih ' . fit 4 x m` 7 L' ° aR &.. tnR \ : ° 3 ' > i �R' # * - Lsfir ' y. 4 €e b n R 4 t t i= it 4ti-: -. v y 1 Y ( .,111/4, t ' f _ y . f S I t� , 7. I r 4 � r ' ,c < Z ' . 2 . 4 d 1 b >111 1r { ya `a , � .,.� px' T r'� � : a TM IAA .,." 1 1 4 0 ` N r ko aY ',../...41.74* . a4' 3 I1 t � a ,3' t x 't°4-441`.t. it ds' , '�} ... a '01-14,3S g K ti i = ' g m t y * � . a• . N £ 3.E E `W, .+ D trt" ti . 1 E� , P 1 y , al . 1 1r j?i y� agc t •;�� �::'$ r ': .1aa n2.i " it, E, 0 P ••OI n x ! e C, _ 41 1 4 ' rl f %h.* g ' r 1 t .. 4 �s — t c� M , F ' 1 \ A 'i , ' N i' co `r' / i l� ' b ° A "l�' ,_ \ ' C ; A .E C (/)°‘ "�P PP'4.4 } � r " c � � i Fir �r Y i' ' :D -0171 1" tF y `� ' � . y "t h ,, 3 I -„ a 1[,1:1. t� �i k k, iv'. '. C� D r[ . i G 33 0 "`))) a.�. , ,yr� n , C q �am . �"`r ,( 'p' " n s * J c. £ACS i=)y Y. 6 Vi f1 ° Y e 'T' 1 ID Ira n ' V h • ; 1 ' . i t?.. q O •rr iyp 1 •0 i ,' IA,* w . -„ * e r a f e y m 4xA m „ n I , \t t ':. ._. > � .sh 11 er t a l b � , f I .E E( Z w. D N� e ; : : E p 't e t -,. . s 7rm ' 4 w 77e 37„ i A S m e`sc s S a : � h > !,� � � y k , +, a �o. � r rat0 1 k } ,mim°4 . , W y J rr a9 . . � , . ,i jii y`. e 4 a „ � r C mr31 t It 3 �`� . 1C , s 2 `` 2 - : ' e ` 7.4111. a ^ . r e 4'1 ` . � t, V , °' lk 1 ,4 p ;' Z� a 4 R ' e a ^^ yy., - .a'x 1 F x y ', 5 , ), Ilk 1 ' a s • � (!� > ] � £ i £ . �£� itc‘ . `r. 1 + ' � \ * • / • - 7. 471» a ' '. '7'1 ( e z• W ii ? I .. ' a• �\ C. I t I J l� j , A�.O � �#' i SVk 'S xh'a f �' a. • tOit E W ` 1 tW tto ” ,7C 4 332 , 4 : y ' w s ' i '? ./..,,0 p , , ' ' O , r S w v �p r .' 4 1 Irts u "1 'r > ¢ . j `'.P {K ;t'SZ,' Is L y ! • a a (• l p ; l + a '9' \ ' ; ;-.1-1„ } i � or 4 Z a 4c r. '• t cot Z , ''', .;', a► \tS, :.;_ s -As a f t r t ylnp,..,.. 1 ° ` . -t (' t Et t '3 ' �' a n Ny w <. Vr ``--- e Gi' Y 7 e I ,, h / D r 1 r lth01 e {. . fi t # n ` :ii.,/,'", . 33,6" r ti '1 . r -, 44 .e °f 'i, k A , 4 t� Y _ , .. • ) " .S+ al _ sk 1 x ia' • T ',� 'sat. � yyv. t o Case No. 11 -019 Application Page 3 of 3 Public Hearing Item 7 - D P &Z February 16, 2011 Request a Rezone, according to KIBC 17.205, 17.50 and 17.130, Current Location to rezone a 2.66 acre portion of Tract B -1A, U.S. Survey 4947 from 200 Trident Way C- Conservation to PL- Public Land Use, in order to allow the P & Z Case 11 - 019 eventual development of a new Alaska Department of Fish & Game Kodiak Island Borough office and research building to be located on the same lot as the r ��',y /�), existing Fisheries Research Center (KFRC). { { { /// 411 °I I °I 1 0 .44 S..- is I :y 41 P. P ,.....X-7. , , t i a , ,-- ( 7 7- - - ( -- : --7 Kodiak Island Borough GIS Legend N 1 6 Feet f�. ... I � Subject Parcel W \ E ee , S�J 0 460 920 1,840 i , . 1 i a i i Not ification Area S Tian map was prepared from no Kodiak Island Borough's cis system. It Is prowled for the propose of sho*ing the general location of a propany within he Kodak Island Borough Ths map does not represent a survey. More information about the mapping data can be warned by m410c8rg the Kodiak Island Borough fr Dapanmern at (907) 486 -9333. Case No. 11 -019 Public Comment Page 1 of 4 Public Hearing Item 7 - D P &Z February 16, 2011 %> Kodiak Island ,'t ®rough ;` rb A / Community Development Department • •, ��� 710 Mill Bay Road Room 205 i; l� , t y Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Phone (907) 486 -9363 Fax (907) 486 -9396 www.kodiakak.us January 13, 2011 Mr. Bob Scholze, Resource Management Officer Kodiak Island Borough 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, AK 99615 Re: Case 11 -019. Request a Rezone, according to KIBC 17.205, 17.50 and 17.130, to rezone a 2.66 acre portion of Tract B -IA, U.S. Survey 4947 from C- Conservation to PL- Public Land Use, in order to allow the eventual development of a new Alaska Department of Fish & Game office and research building to be located on the same lot as the existing Kodiak Fisheries Research Center (KFRC). Dear Mr. Scholze: Please be advised that the Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission has scheduled the case referenced above for Public Hearing at their February 16, 2011 regular meeting, This meeting will begin at 6:30 p.m. in the Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska. Attendance at this meeting is not mandatory but recommended. One week prior to the regular meeting, on Wednesday, February 9, 2011 at 6:30 p.m. in the Borough Conference Room ( #121), the Commission will hold a packet review work session for the purpose of reviewing packet materials and staff summaries of cases scheduled for the regular meeting. The public is welcome to attend the packet review work session; however, the work session is not for the purpose of receiving public testimony. Applicants who wish to present testimony and/or evidence related to their case should appear at the Public Hearing during the Regular Meeting and present such information in person. Please contact the Community Development Department at 486 -9363 if we can answer any outstanding questions or provide additional information. In advance, thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, Sheila Smith, Secretary Community Development Department Case No. 11 -019 Public Comment Page 2 of 4 Public Hearing Item 7 - D P &Z February 16, 2011 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska 99615 (907) 486-9363 Public Hearing Item 7 -D PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE A public hearing will be held on Wednesday, February 16, 2011. The meeting will begin at 6:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska, before the Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission, to hear comments if any, on the following request: CASE: 11 - 019 APPLICANT: Kodiak island Borough AGENT: Bob Scholze, Resource Management Officer REQUEST: A Rezone, according to KIBC 17.205, 17.50 and 17.130, to rezone a 2.66 acre portion of Tract B -I A, U.S. Survey 4947 from C- Conservation to PL- Public Land Use, in order to allow the eventual development of a new Alaska Department of Fish & Game office and research building to be located on the same lot as the existing Kodiak Fisheries Research Center (KFRC). LOCATION: 200 Trident Way ZONING: C- Conservation This notice is being sent to you because our records indicate you are a property owner /interested party in the area of the request. If you do not wish to testify verbally, you may provide your comments in the space below or in a letter to the Community Development Department. Written comments must be received by 5 pm, February 1, 2011 to be considered by the commission. If you would like to fax your comments to us, our fax number is: (907) 486- 9396, or you may email your comments to ssmith(&kodiakak.us. If you would like to testify via telephone, please call in your comments during the appropriate public hearing section of the meeting. The local call -in telephone number is 486 -3231. The toll free telephone number is 1- 800 - 478 -5736. One week prior to the regular meeting, on Wednesday, February 9, 2011, a work session will be held at 6:30 p.m. in the Kodiak Island Borough Conference Room ( #121), to review the packet material for the case. Kodiak Island Borough Code provides you with specific appeal rights if you disagree with the Commission's decision on this request. If you have any questions about the request or your appeal rights, please feel free to call us at 486 -9363. Your Nante: Mailing Address: Your property description: Comments: Case No. 11 -019 Public Comment Page 3 of 4 Public Hearing Item 7 - D P &Z February 16, 2011 UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH CITY OF KODIAK 910 YUKON DR, #106 710 MILL BAY RD P.O. BOX 1397 FAIRBANKS, AK 99775 KODIAK, AK 99615 KODIAK, AK 99615 MARINE CENTER LLC C/0 FINNEY, NEILL & CO., P.S. 9757 GREENWOOD AVE. N. KODIAK, AK 99615 Case No. 11 -019 Public Comment Page 4 of 4 Public Hearing Item 7 - D P &Z February 16, 2011 MEMORANDUM Date: February 4, 2011 To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: Community Development Department Subject: Information for the February 16, 2011 Regular Meeting Case: 11 -019 Applicant: Kodiak Island Borough Agent: Robert Scholze Request: A Rezone, according to KIBC 17.205, 17.50 and 17.130, to rezone a 2.66 acre portion of Tract B -1A, U.S. Survey 4947 from C- Conservation to PL- Public Land Use, in order to allow the eventual development of a new Alaska Department of Fish & Game office and research building to be located on the same lot as the existing Kodiak Fisheries Research Center (KFRC). Location: 200 Trident Way Legal Description: A 2.66 acre portion of Tract B -1A, U.S. Survey 4947 Zoning: C - Conservation Zoning District Four (4) public hearing notices related to this request were mailed on January 13, 2011. Date of site visit: Various 1. Zoning History: The 1968 Comprehensive Plan identified this area as Residential — R -1. This general area was classified as Public Open Space & Recreational by Ordinance 80 -3 -0 (a), and further clarified as C - Conservation Zoning District by Ordinance 80 -4 -0 (a). This tract portion was confirmed as zoned C - Conservation Zoning District by Ordinance 88 -01- 0. 2. Lot Size: 2.66 acre 3. Existing Land Use: Vacant 4. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North: United States Survey 4947 — Near Island Use: Vacant Zoning: SLZ — Split Lot Zoning South: United States Survey 2261 Tract F Use: Trident Basin Seaplane Facility Zoning: LI - Light Industrial Zoning District Case No. 11 -019 Staff Rpt Page 1 of 9 Public Hearing Item 7 - D P &Z February 16, 2011 East: United States Survey 4947 Tract A Use: Research Facility - Fisheries Industrial Technology Center Zoning: PL- Public Use Zoning District West: United States Survey 4947 — Near Island Use: Vacant Zoning: SLZ — Split Lot Zoning 5. Comprehensive Plan: The 1968 Comprehensive Plan identified this area as Residential — R -1. The Year 2000 Land Use was projected as Public & Open Space. The 1987 Near Island Comprehensive Development Plan designated this area as C - Conservation Zoning District. The Kodiak Island Borough 2008 Comprehensive Plan identifies the proposed future land use of the proposed rezone area Public Facilities /Ownership, and specifically denotes "Research Park ". 6. Applicable Regulations: The following sections of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Borough Code and the Kodiak Island Borough Coastal Management Program are applicable to this request: Title 17 Zoning KIBC 17.10.020 Reference and use. In accordance with Alaska Statutes, zoning decisions shall be based upon the recommendations contained in the comprehensive plan. The applicable comprehensive plan is the 2008 Kodiak Island Borough Comprehensive Plan Update. KIBC 17.205.030 Manner of initiation. Changes in this title (request for a rezone) may be initiated in the following manner: A. By petition of one (1) or more owners of property within an area proposed to be rezoned. A petition shall be in the form of an application for a change in the boundary of a district, shall be filed in the community development department, be accompanied by the required fee and such data and information as may be necessary to assure the fullest practicable presentation of facts and shall set forth reasons and justification for proposing such change. KIBC 17.205.055 Submission to assembly. A. Within thirty days after the planning commission has acted favorably upon a proposed zoning change in accordance with the above provisions, a report with recommendations shall be submitted to the assembly together with the proposed ordinance. Such recommendations of the planning commission shall be advisory only and shall not be binding upon the assembly. When an ordinance has been forwarded to the borough assembly, the assembly shall act in accordance with this Case No. 11 -019 Staff Rpt Page 2 of 9 Public Hearing Item 7 - D P &Z February 16, 2011 chapter and notice shall be issued as provided in Section 17.72.070, by the borough clerk. B. If the planning commission recommends denial of any proposed amendment; its action shall be final unless the initiating party, within ten days, files a written statement with the clerk requesting that the commission's action be taken up by the borough assembly. Coastal Management Applicable Policies (For a project description and Local Coastal Management Plan impacts, including mitigation measures, please refer to the Appendix, pages 4 through 7.) 4.4 Enforceable Policies B. Coastal Development Policy B -1: Multiple Use a. Structures or dredged or fill material placed in coastal waters shall be designed to minimize the need for duplicative facilities. Consistency: Yes! The proposed development does not propose to place fill or dredge material into coastal waters. b. This policy is established for the Coastal Development standard (11 AAC 112.200) subject use. It applies to all uses and activities related to siting of facilities in or adjacent to coastal waters and placement of dredged or fill material into coastal waters. Consistency: Yes! The proposed development does not duplicate existing facilities. The proposed development expands and enhances the existing development pattern. Policy B -3: Dredge and Fill Activities a. An applicant for a project that will place structures or discharge dredge or fill material into coastal waters must include in the project description measures that will limit the extent of direct disturbance to as small an area as possible. Consistency: Yes! b. This policy is established for the Coastal Development standard (11 AAC 112.200) subject use. It applies to all uses and activities related to placement of structures in or adjacent to coastal waters and placement of dredged or fill material into coastal waters. Consistency: Yes! C. Natural Hazards Policy C -1: Erosion and Landslides a. Proposed development and resource extraction activities in designated erosion hazard areas shall: 1. Minimize removal of existing vegetative cover, and 2. Stabilize soils and re- vegetate with native species for areas where development necessitates removal of vegetation, unless re- vegetation activities would cause more damage. Consistency: Not Applicable. The rezone location is not located in a designated erosion hazard area. b. Subsection a applies to areas designated as erosion hazards under 11 AAC 114.250(b) as described in Section 4.5.2. Consistency: Not Applicable. The rezone location is not located in a steep slope area or identified as within an erosion hazard area. Case No. 11 -019 Staff Rpt Page 3 of 9 Public Hearing Item 7 - D P &Z February 16, 2011 D. Coastal Habitats and Resources Policy D -5: Wind Generation and Bird Habitat a. The applicant shall incorporate measures into the project description regarding the siting of wind generation projects to minimize mortality to birds. These measures shall include, but are not limited to, installation of turbines on the tallest towers practicable for the site, configuration of towers to reduce the likelihood of bird strikes, and use of tubular towers, fully enclosed nacelles or other appropriate technology that has been demonstrated to reduce bird mortality from wind turbines. Consistency: Not Applicable! b. This policy applies to uses and activities related to the Energy Facilities Standard 11 AAC 112.230. Consistency: Not Applicable! H. Recreation Policy H -1: Protection of Recreation Resources and Uses a. On public lands and waters used for recreation activities within designated recreation areas or on private lands and waters within designated recreation areas where the landowner has granted formal permission for recreational activities, non - recreational projects and activities shall be located, designed, constructed and operated to avoid significant adverse impacts to recreation resources and activities, including access and scenic views unless a comparable alternative recreational opportunity can be provided that would not decrease the quality of the recreation experience in another area. Consistency: Not Applicable! b. Access through water bodies shall be maintained. 1. Fences shall not be constructed across streams, 2. Bridges must be constructed at least four feet above the ordinary high water mark, 3. Structures, other than weirs, shall not impede travel by watercraft along waterways, and 4. Weirs shall be constructed to allow for small boat passage over or around the structures, and warning signs shall be placed at least 25 yards upstream of the weirs. Consistency: Not applicable! c. This policy applies to areas designated for recreation under 11 AAC 114.250(c) as described in Section 4.5.1, and it applies to all uses and activities that could affect recreational values described in the resource inventory and analysis. Consistency: Not applicable! 1. Archaeological and Historic Resources Policy 1 -1: Consultation and Surveys a. For projects within the historic and prehistoric designation area, the applicant shall submit with the consistency review packet an assessment of potential impacts to historic and prehistoric resources and a plan for the protection of those resources. As part of the assessment, the applicant shall consult with the KIB, tribal entities and the Alutiiq Museum. Consistency: Yes! b. This policy is established for areas designated for the study, understanding and illustration of history and prehistory under 11 AAC 114.2500) as described in Section 4.5.4. It applies to all uses and activities that could affect these resources. Consistency: Yes! Case No. 11 -019 Staff Rpt Page 4 of 9 Public Hearing Item 7 - D P &Z February 16, 2011 Policy 1 -2: Resource Protection a. For projects within the historic and prehistoric designation area, if previously undiscovered artifacts or areas of historic, prehistoric or archaeological importance are encountered during development, an artifact curation agreement will be developed between the landowner, appropriate state of federal preservation authorities, and the curation facility if artifacts are discovered on the project site. Consistency: Yes) b. This policy is established for areas designated for the study, understanding and illustration of history and prehistory under 11 AAC 114.250(i) as described in Section 4.5.4. It applies to all uses and activities that could affect these resources. Consistency: Yes! K. Mineral Extraction and Processing Policy K -1: Siting of Material Sources a. Sources of sand and gravel shall be authorized in the following priority: 1. Upland sites, including river terraces above historic high water, 2. Areas of low habitat value, including river bars, 3. Streams which do not provide fish habitat, and 4. Other habitats. Consistency: _ Not Applicable. The project does not involve extraction of sand and gravel resources) b. This policy applies to the sand and gravel standard (11 AAC 112.260). Consistency: Not Applicable. The project does not involve extraction of sand and gravel resources) 4.5 Designated Areas N/A 4.5.1 Recreation Areas N/A 4.5.2 Natural Hazard Areas N/A 4.5.3 Important Habitat Area N/A 4.5.4 Historic and Prehistoric Resource Areas N/A 4.5.5 Commercial Fishing and Seafood Processing Facilities N/A 4.5.6 Subsistence Areas N/A Case No. 11 -019 Staff Rpt Page 5 of 9 Public Hearing Item 7 - D P &Z February 16, 2011 Comments This application for a rezone is an administrative initiative in order to "tie up loose ends" and facilitate the completion of development of an administrative and academic research complex located on Near Island. The establishment of an integrated administrative and academic complex has been projected to benefit the local community in several respects. These benefits include retaining an important local employment sector, ensuring commercial fisheries competiveness, and enhancing local tourism opportunities. The establishment and development of a research park located on Near Island has been a long term goal of the Kodiak Island Borough Assembly and has been buttressed by continuing support from the City of Kodiak'. Conformance with the comprehensive plan: The Kodiak Island Borough 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update notes under "Implementation Policies" (Chapter 12, Page3): "Identify an adequate supply of land . . . to meet future needs for homes and businesses, including commercial and industrial uses. Additional study is needed to estimate future employment in specific industries and related needs for land zoned for those types of uses. For example, in assessing the need and most appropriate locations for new industrial [Business] land, consider the following factors: ➢ The need to support potential economic growth sectors. The level of need should be based on an assessment of trends in population growth and in specific economic sectors, including a realistic assessment of their potential within the KIB. ➢ Proximity to adequate public facilities, including roads, water, and air transport facilities, as well as water and wastewater treatment facilities. ➢ Potential conflicts with adjacent land uses, particularly residential uses, and sensitive natural resources. ➢ Parcel size, topography, and other site characteristics as they relate to the requirements of businesses in anticipated growth industries. As noted earlier, the plan specifically designates this area as "Research Park " The 1987 Near Island Comprehensive Development Plan offers a short discussion of this area of Near Island under section 4.A Description of Development Categories and Allowable Land Uses. Fisheries Industrial Technology Center. "The FITC designation relates to the land areas which are being deeded by the City to the State of Alaska for the Fisheries Technology Information Center ". Located to the east of the proposed rezone area, the FITC was the initial research related development within the research / academic zone. Follow -on development to the west has included visiting academic's housing, and the Near Island Research Facility. 1 See Resolution 09 -06 Appendix Page 1 of 11 2 Appendix Page 3 of 11 Case No. 11 -019 Staff Rpt Page 6 of 9 Public Hearing Item 7 - D P &Z February 16, 2011 The current proposed development of a new ADF &G administration and research building is viewed as a natural adjunct to the idealized "research campus" concept supporting two of the local economy's pillars, i.e., the seafood industry, and by extension, the tourism industry. Staff typically recommends that the commission give due deference to the recommended land uses provided in the comprehensive plan(s). Zoning /use: This area has been designated for public use, in one form or another, for many years. The current proposed development fits neatly within the scope of permitted uses in the PL- Public Use Zoning District. Currently zoned C - Conservation Zoning District, the development would in all likelihood be permitted as a Conditional Use in the C - Conservation Zoning District under any other scenario. Rezoning to PL- Public Use Zoning District removes an unnecessary administrative hurdle and facilitates project permitting and financing. Land suitability: The parcel subject is not ideal from a development standpoint. However, it does have redeeming qualities. The site, by virtue of topography, remoteness, and natural vegetation, offers screening, landscaping, and buffering naturally. Engineering concerns have had to address elevation changes, drainages, and recreational pathways. Sufficient land area is available to provide mitigation measures on site, and these have been incorporated in the design. Municipal water and sewer utilities are available. The site offers, and the design takes advantage of a world class water view. This is an amenity shared by the sister facilities comprising the research campus. One point that staff notes is the proximity of Trident Basin Seaplane Base. The seaplane base is a large noise generator during peak operations, and it remains to be seen if this potential conflict ultimately detracts from the overall campus atmosphere. Recent development trends in the area: Facility development in the immediate area has been on a hiatus since the completion of the residential apartments serving visiting researchers (- 1997). The intervening years has seen some expansion and improvement to the Trident Basin Seaplane Base. This expansion has focused on excavations and provision of suitable land area to support development of airplane service and storage hangars. Private investment has occurred along Alimaq Drive (formerly Dog Salmon Bay Road). Recent completions of a corporate headquarters building and mini - storage warehouse units comprise the bulk of the private investment. Additional private investment along this roadway has been announced within the past year, but this project appears to have been placed on hold. Farther out, public investments have been made in continuing excavation work in order to provide increased land area for industrial use, and the completion of the City of Kodiak's boat lift facility. Case No. 11 -019 Staff Rpt Page 7 of 9 Public Hearing Item 7 - D P &Z February 16, 2011 Traffic impacts: Uses in the PL- Public Use Zoning District have parking and traffic generation characteristics very similar to uses in the B- Business zone. Computed on a gross square footage calculation of the proposed building (including parking garage), the ICBO occupancy rating is projected to be 390 persons. Fish & Game Administrative Services has estimated staffing levels of approximately 75 permanent and 30 seasonal employees, although it is unlikely that all of these employees would be in the building at the same time. This staff is currently split between the downtown building and the Griffin building on the channel, and all would be relocated. There is also the question of the number of public contacts (walk -ups) that might occur. A historical visitor or daily client count has not been a matter of inquiry by the state, and so a projection of daily trips would be mere speculation. The proposed development, and the three existing facilities, will all be served by one route of ingress and egress. Although anecdotal information indicates that the single route of ingress and egress is sufficient for the proposed development, staff is skeptical of the route's capacity 1 adequacy when cumulative impacts are considered. However, the point is beyond this report's scope, and is probably better left to another investigation. Case No. 11 -019 Staff Rpt Page 8 of 9 Public Hearing Item 7 - D P &Z February 16, 2011 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Commission forward this rezone request to the Kodiak Island Borough Assembly with a recommendation that it be approved. APPROPRIATE MOTION Should the Commission agree with the staff recommendation, the appropriate motion is: Move to recommend, according to KIBC 17.205, 17.50 and 17.130, the rezone of a 2.66 acre portion of Tract B -1A, U.S. Survey 4947 from C- Conservation to PL- Public Land Use, in order to allow the eventual development of a new Alaska Department of Fish & Game office and research building to be located on the same lot as the existing Kodiak Fisheries Research Center (KFRC); and to adopt the "Findings of Fact" in the staff report dated February 4, 2011 in support of this recommendation.. Staff recommends that this motion be approved by the commission. Findings of Fact Kodiak Island Borough Title 17.205.020 states "The commission shall report in writing to the assembly on any proposed change or amendment regardless of the manner in which such change is initiated and such report shall find:" A. Findings as to need and justification for a change or amendments A rezone of Tract B -1A United States Survey 4947 removes the administrative ambiguity that arises due to a "split -lot zoning" configuration. A rezone of Tract B -1A United States Survey 4947 exemplifies good planning practices. B. Findings as to the effect a change or amendment would have on the objectives of the comprehensive plan and A rezone of Tract B -1A United States Survey 4947 is fully compatible with the objectives of the Kodiak Island Borough 2008 Plan Update. A rezone of Tract B -1A United States Survey 4947 is generally consistent with the objectives of the 1987 Near Island Comprehensive Development Plan. C. Recommendations as to the approval or disapproval of the change or amendment. The Kodiak Island Borough Planning & Zoning Commission recommends that the Kodiak Island Borough Assembly approve the rezone of that portion of Tract B -1A United States Survey 4947 currently zoned C - Conservation Zoning District to PL- Public Use Zoning District. Case No. 11 -019 Staff Rpt Page 9 of 9 Public Hearing Item 7 - D P &Z February 16, 2011 t , t } ° ' : a -t 4 r ' .Y 4.-•-• , 7` \ o gr , i j s , 4 Y e ` - b .- sa. { **. r / , T . 41 t. Aj -,p. i' G l` / % {. y.r r 5 Sc L o it 1 "' 4% �b ' from , Q ` „ .y t / t J .r - t7Y ` , <) ` , ",a ,t s y� f� .g474 y y Y ,� It k j - J.t FY 4 � , "L 4 J', Lli ' i 1 t= t a "� illre�1 4 2 L�. W9.]r . : G76o0CU.1C*"'"d nFtaK443a g itjAi ►� 4 /t Jr ; G Y' -:T .ditz. ! t�r't:5 ` .ite , sJp,. .,, ,. ,.. - C. -E • . i! u. ♦`4 r Yr aY x r �Jt GL SO - G, -❑ ling / � O • Y < 5 ,. , w- i to f1� .i ° O p : 1 ➢ � ,.4 :gig. o a t° • a I -Q�! 1 O UG� i �"�fi11ti�1 9 4.1 -, Y7 p ngQ t y Fitt - Np S [, Q GU ` "oaw 7.5. �I� 1i v .,a d d �� n r � ; cn. ,r• \ a� Ln 44171.9," p 3 ,P .C s . 00 0CYVCG790GO0. ' ' � !c " i ' " •. a �, o .Cr.•eeeaeeecrca: �5a . .0 r"Gr � l" " ormooa Yyr'T dtE[ "F ftu7lt.i n •,r kriqsafd erp, E1 ° r < HARBOR ' �` f °nt c `' ° r + o ' . f ^ti c , , to 1i 7WrD ISLAM m j { P Proposed Ferry } ` %c, y ilY r ' J r .., r 1 p� H . t nEEYt [ll f - 4,44 •et Terminal rSlL±d�9 f, - --S4t �vy Jr Sr-Sib-pi., uU� /IC R4N dM't«14` Cb� P /b^ 11 FGtS rc y v 5 y t ' � j z � c ; t °r n'� t° 1v 1 d (U5M'MANI .` r _, , � lll p1 • .� t A ,1 � rt � L �-i:7 1.,„,. as t , - -YIF C�r'EON1, u: > ,le twu• • i bS 8x�" eltr +nJoS •4t r.1 - ` uYUld ii,- I - •�a.. �; ' i� c Lr re { 0 ��44h��t � . ! y F l tm „ y y. � 4 - '3'4'p! . ".- ( 'li > \,3 ' ubty --ccj .1 Cr S t' ,% +.. r d�" . '± , , me i:,. .i , • N � h ^�/J,,4Y �5. or. : c i t+ y ` �� q tr (l � i..et w� � � r '.w � . v - +W'�LitT4 .". . .N.N.... /. WN n ,,...... NN,N I N,N ,N, N, t ' Al a / NN „A.NN -W'YM44 �t .l 0 '}= Research • 'tf >:' , +` Park / ""°.WY. R Sea Plane "•N...,/ Base Kodiak Island Borough - Kodiak Urt Q Commercial /Business Conservation Ell Future Special Planning 1 1. ` 1 Industrial /Light Industrial Case No. 11 -019 Appendix Page 1 of 9 Public Hearing Item 7 - D P &Z February 16, 2011 Coastal Project Questionnaire Kodiak Near Island Research & Administration Facility Kodiak Near Island Research & Administration Facility Kodiak, Alaska Project Description The Kodiak Island Borough proposes to construct a new office and laboratory building on Tract B -1A on Near Island in Kodiak (approx. 57.780 ° N, 152.397 ° W). The facility will house the Kodiak offices of the Alaska Department of Fish and Game (DFG) which will move from their current location downtown. The 15.8 acre property is owned by the Borough and is presently occupied by the Kodiak Fisheries Research Center (KFRC) and the Visiting Scientist Housing apartments. The Borough has had the desire to create a research campus at this location, and the new facility will help fulfill those ambitions. DFG currently shares laboratory space in KFRC where they have access to seawater -based research. Co- locating the new facility on the Near Island site will enhance this relationship. The existing site has varying topography and vegetation with steep shoreline slopes. A public use trail currently traverses the site, and connections to this trail will be provided. Site access is from Trident Way onto Research Court and along the western edge of the existing development. Water, wastewater, and underground electric and telecom services will be extended from rough -ins pre - planned at the time KFRC was constructed. Upstream stormwater is collected along a new rock lined swale and returns to a natural downstream swale via a portion of culvert under the paved area. The proposed building is two stories of office and laboratory space totaling 32,300 SF over a 10,250 square foot covered parking garage for 24 vehicles. There is additional surface parking for 56 cars. The garage significantly reduces the site development impact. The garage will be constructed of cast -in- place concrete with braced -frame steel used for the upper floors. Foundations will rest on solid bedrock. Landscaping will be introduced along the boundaries and interior of the developed area and will be native, low- maintenance varieties. Construction and Timeline Best management practices will be implemented during construction. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be developed by the Contractor prior to construction and will be kept available throughout construction. Construction is expected to begin in the spring of 2011 and continue into the fall of 2012. Attachment 'A' Case No. 11 -019 Appendix Page 2 of 9 Public Hearing Item 7 - D P &Z February 16, 2011 Coastal Project Questionnaire Kodiak, Alaska Kodiak Near Island Research & Administration Facility Consistency Review Kodiak Near Island Research & Administration Facility Kodiak Island Borough, District Enforceable Policies Enforceable Policy Evaluation Policy B -1: Structures or dredged or fill N/A (The project will not involve Multiple Use material placed in coastal waters dredge or fill material in coastal shall be designed to minimize waters.) the need for duplicative facilities. Policy B -3: An applicant for a project that N/A (The project will not involve Dredge and Fill Activities will place structures or discharge dredge or fill material in coastal dredge or fill material into waters.) coastal waters must include in the project description measures that will limit the extent of direct disturbance to as small an area as possible. Policy C -1: Minimize removal of existing Site disturbance will not involve Erosion and Landslides vegetative cover. degradation of vegetative cover beyond that required for the building and associated parking, driveways and pedestrian facilities. Policy C -1: Stabilize soils and re- vegetate Disturbed areas will be planted Erosion and Landslides with native species for areas with vegetation suitable for where development necessitates lower sloped areas. Native removal of vegetation, unless re- bedrock and /or rock facings will vegetation activities would cause be used on steep vertical slopes. more damage. Policy D -5: The applicant shall incorporate N/A (The project will not involve Wind Generation and Bird measures into the project wind turbines or wind -power Habitat description regarding the siting facilities.) of wind generation projects to minimize mortality to birds. Policy H -1: Non - recreational projects and An informal pedestrian trail will Protection of Recreation activities shall be located, be realigned as necessary for the Resources and Uses designed, constructed and new development. operated to avoid significant adverse impacts to recreation resources and activities. Attachment 'B' Case No. 11 -019 Appendix Page 3 of 9 Public Hearing Item 7 - D P &Z February 16, 2011 Coastal Project Questionnaire Kodiak, Alaska Kodiak Near Island Research & Administration Facility Policy H -1: Access through water bodies There is no water access on the Protection of Recreation shall be maintained. site. Resources and Uses Policy 1 -1: For projects within the historic Consultation with the Kodiak Consultation and Surveys and prehistoric designation area, Island Borough and Alutiiq the applicant shall submit with Museum (Patrick Saltonstall, the consistency review packet an 1/5/11) has indicated that there assessment of potential impacts is little potential for the to historic and prehistoric proposed project to affect resources and a plan for the prehistoric or historic resources. protection of those resources. The review of the Alaska Historic Resources Survey found no known sites at the project location (Tracy Krauthoeffer, SHPO, 12/15/10). Policy 1 -2: For projects within the historic During the construction process, Resource Protection and prehistoric designation area, if undiscovered artifacts or sites if previously undiscovered are found, construction activities artifacts or areas of historic, would halt and the KIB and State prehistoric or archaeological Historic Preservation Office importance are encountered (SHPO)would be contacted and a during development, an artifact curation agreement would be curation agreement will be formulated. developed between the landowner, appropriate state of federal preservation authorities, and the curation facility if artifacts are discovered on the project site. Policy K -1: Sources of sand and gravel shall The project, which is located on Siting of Material Sources be authorized in the following uplands, will not involve material priority: sources, except where excavated 1. Upland sites, including river material may optionally be used terraces above historic high for fill activities under building water, and paving if structurally 2. Areas of low habitat value, suitable. including river bars, 3. Streams which do not provide fish habitat, and 4. Other habitats. Attachment 'B' Case No. 11 -019 Appendix Page 4 of 9 Public Hearing Item 7 - D �/ P &Z February 16, 2011 i v , • y r j u li `.,; b,,2 � , - { a •• % ".444'2114 .`^YY t f. ++Ti.. f ' � � NA•jr $ ' ��IOJTM J 1. +i a \ " `. � u f .# a ' b ' . y b " NEAR ISL�QiVD �*, 1 ' ` . i, © , � '°� � r 4 � . �{ k l y s KODIAk i ' 1' 4 d'' k , =" � v ti. fr 4 : -, .�,i - - ' .F t ' T ' 4 � : 4 *-..„. ===v•.=-'•= fi +VV � r"Y yy �' . ! a `' � i ce{ .°* �"` F 4 \ .. . , i M i • �`r� E ♦ . � � .3 ' A � 9•. ; � � {�J �.t<� M:. ��'M I j. " 45,.1 4.-1":, . r�- rE-TI r . �i' x . 1 - elm 'R' +. . .., „/r � : \ . . ma y � >\ M Ai T. _ � % • 1•.M k:..�� (ft 'gift i P . NEW' F f 7 PARKING f 'iu'A.' .� E A' R j '+ ,asap "Z. • P xi sta t a 4�i t � ! t -, � �A _ V " •V TRIDENT BASIN • P!�RRKK t •Kfi4-v - n o, a 4.--,060. ` cry .l�Yi ily �`� Y r a - rxw a Y 0 • ,,c �... iWe!ttyE,T�:e.�.� -� - - ---^" j KO D IAK a ' FISHERIES RESEARCH C -ENTER ,, - PROPOSED KODIAK NEAR „ 1 0g0) e o 600' / ISLAND RESEARCH FACILITY 0 1 fn Kodiak - - 4,11)1..;::= _ \ 9 ~ -\ s Q Project Site Attachment 'C' Case No. 11 -019 Appendix Page 5 of 9 Public Hearing Item 162011 7 - D P &Z February , • KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ORDINANCE O. 88 -01 -0 ISLAND AN ORDINANCE OF THE KODIAK IS ISLAN CT FROM THE EXISTING THE BUSINESS, ISLAND BOROUGH ASS SU$INESS, 1-- INDUSTRIAL, SAND REZONING NEAR AS SHOWN ON TUE ATTACHED MAP. TRIAL, C - - CONS EA VA TLON AND C-- COB$ERVATTON AND PL-- PUBLIC USE WHEREAS, the intent of this rezoning ordinance is to implement the Near Island Comprehensive D evelopment p Island into Plan; by bringing the zonln conformance with the P 8 of Near ; and WHEREAS, the specific intent of the Neer Island Task Force, the Near Island Development Authority, the City of Kodiak, and the Kodiak Island g and Zoning Commission is to establish the boundary between the channel greenbelt and adjoining commercial de signations as the crest st of The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly hereby ordains that: Section -- 1: Near Island is rezoned from the existing B -_ Business, 1-- Industrial, and C-- Conservation de signations to B-- Business, 7 -Industrial, C-- Conservation, and P L — public Use Lands as shown on the attached map. Section Z• Specific Zoning District boundaries will be established at the time a final plats) is filed, subject Co the specific intent stated above, using the attached map as a guideline, Sect The official zonin this rezoning E map shall be updated to reflect Section 4: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon passage and adoption, PASSED AND APPROVED THIS 4 DAY OF February --� 1 988. KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH HY Jerome by, bo roug i / ry / ate, • gy /4 t CC! Lorne A T: rite, Presiding Of leer HT (Yet. • i :ye Vain n. Hot. gh Clerk C a • First Reading, Approval Date: Second Reading, public Hearing, Approval Dete: Effective Date: T January 1988 4 Februa 1988 < Pebrua Assessing Distribution List: 1988 Department Community Development Department Engineering Department ORDINANCE 88 -01 -0 PAGE 1 OF 1 Case No. 11 -019 Appendix Page 6 of 9 0 1 r L--7 Ems' J - ADO P i Zor I It. G • � 5..,. ;itAM 's .....: m �, ., - . tied m [J IIO EUSINIESS � � r ) U LL .Z1:1DU5T2 L :... .' r , A � k � . P N TH cr . ` . ft 021 + Si 1 1 y � ,P P � 1 1 1 - A� ' , � S ,111- ti Pa � 9 r -„44 � �± %} • a a L' I Pu A 41wc ro. �3t LA L r1DS vT Y; m � ��� P , � b 1 S J� O ■ L ---1 -2 c,A SE R../ AT i ..t,-.J f °�_ ' • . . _ a T ' o f � i )_ - a.). SQ • 4 3 P 8 S I ■ by i ■ it > - (.2 fy, / CD 1 0 \ . � , , N / • �� ,,, �, � � / , � r • 0 �o `• � Z CD co ift � pa S � L� I �'i°� � R p o R. . -* AS APPRrrmt ay -ru • Q•N.b.m.56, u.Jp s �O - . ° -�J _ DFEaN ! 6n19i..ai ers_ �_S � � ): .- ..P'.OPUED -U. • f Public Hearing Item 7 - D P &Z February 16, 2011 r I r. ! 9 ( t ..'jj0 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ORDINANCE NO. 80- 4 -0(a) i . AN ORDINANCE OF THE KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH REZONING THE LANDS ON WILL ISLAND. USKI ISLAND AND NEAR ISLAND. BE IT ORDAINED BY the Kodiak Island Borough Assembly that: 5ecti� All of the lands on Gull Island and Uski Island are hereby rezoned from conservation to industrial. 5ecti The lands on Near Island are hereby rezoned as follows based upon 'I the Tract designations depicted on the preliminary plat dated January 24, 1980 with revisions dated January 29, 1980. INDUSTRIAL Tract C 51.8 acres Tract 0 10.7 acres a BUSINESS Tract B 22.0 acres Tract F 11.0 acres Tract H 7.3 acres Tracts A, E. G, and I shall remain zoned conservation and further be overlayed with a service and recreational use classification. PASSED AND APPROVED this 1st day of February . 1980. KODIAK - ISLAND BOROUGH BY , 1 i god rw -12 Deputy Borough Mayor ATTEST EY: Bar ugh C FIRST READING DATE: January 24, 1980 SECOND READING, PUBLIC HEARING DATE: February 1 1980 EFFECTIVE DATE: February 1. 1980 4VUESTEO BY: City of Kodiak 1E4 OF ORDINANCE REVISED BY: Planning Department January 31, 1980 yu ‘C 9 NDATION: The Plannin• and Zonin• Commission recommends this Ordinance be ted as revised on January 31, 1980. II PREPARE BY: Planning Department ) l I I I Case No. 11 -019 Appendix Page 8 of 9 Public Hearing Item 7 - D P &Z February 16, 2011 .1 1 n l r a 9 t q i KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ORDINANCE NO. 80- 3 -0(a) I l� CO Q AN ORDINANCE OF THE KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ASSEMBLY AMENDING THE �REHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN AND RECLASSIFYING THE LANDS ON NEAR ISLAND, GULL IS- t AN0 AND USKI ISLAND. i WHEREAS, an January 7, 1980, the City of Kodiak requested the Plan - ping and Zoning Commission rezone the lands on Near Island. And; WHEREAS, Alaska State Statutes Title 29 and Title 17 of the Kodiak 1 i ;Ilsland Borough Code of Ordinances require that all rezoning of land be consls- y ! tent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. And; q : WHEREAS, in 1974 a Comprehensive plan for the development of Near Island was prepared but never adopted by the Borough Assembly. And; WHEREAS, the Planning Zoning Cssin hs reviewed Island this plan and recommended the lands on Near Isla nd, Gull ommi Isl o and an d Uski be re- i ,classified as set forth in their Resolution No. Z -80 -005. NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Kodiak Island Borough Assembly ;that: 1 Section 1: The Comprehensive Land Use Plan effecting the lands on Near Is- land are hereby classified as set forth in Section 2 of this Ordinan e. Section 2: All of Gull Island and Uski Island and proposed Tracts C and D on Near Island are classified for industrial use. Tracts B, F, and H on Near Island are classified for business use. Tracts A, E. G. and I are classified for public open space and recreational use. PASSED AND APPROVE this 1st day of February , 1980. KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH BY. / Av e waC... Deputy Borough -yor ATTEST a BY I FIRST READING DATE: January 24, 1980 SECOND READING, PUBLIC HEARING DATE: February 1, 1980 V j EFFECTIVE DATE: February 1, 1980 I R EQUESTED BY: City of Kodiak ! TEXT OF ORDINANCE REVISED BY: Planning Department on January 31, 1980 J R E COtMIENDATION: The Mannino and Zoning Commission recommends this Ordinance Case No. 11 -019 Appendix Page 9 of 9 COMMISSIONER SCHMITT MOVED to grant a Variance, according to KIBC 17.195 and KIBC 17.80.040.A, to allow for an encroachment of the principal dwelling structure a maximum of .3 feet (approximately 3.6 inches) into the required 25 -foot front yard setback in the R2- Two - family Residential zoning district., and to adopt findings contained in the staff report dated February 4, 2011 as "Findings of Fact" for Case 11 -018. The public hearing was opened & closed: There was no public testimony. Brief discussion FINDINGS OF FACT 17.195.050 A.1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or intended lice of development, which generally do not apply to other properties in the same land use district. This parcel exhibits exceptional conditions applicable to the property or its intended use in the form of a pre- existing construction oversight. 17.195.050 A.2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships, Strict application of the zoning ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship in the form of a stigma attaching to the property title. 17.195.050 A.3. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health. safety and welfare, Granting the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity. The property has been developed as a residential duplex and exhibits characteristics similar to other neighborhood properties developed in a like manner. Connected to the existing municipal water and sewer utilities, the public's health, safety, and welfare are ensured. 17.195.050 A.4. The anting of the variance will not be contrary to the object of the Comprehensive Plan, Granting of the variance will not increase existing density or alter any permitted land uses, and is not contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan which designates this area as Medium Density Residential. 17.195.050 A.S. That actions of the applicant did not cause specia conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance, The actions of the applicant have not caused the conditions for which relief is being sought by variance. 17.195.050 A.6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the district involved. The requested variance will not permit a prohibited use in the applicable zoning district. The existing use as a residential duplex is a permitted use in the applicable zoning district. ROLL CALL VOTE ON MOTION CARRIED 6 -0. u) Lase 11 -019. Request a Rezone, accoraing to KIKt. 1 /.2us, ii.su ana 1/.130, to rezone a 2.66 acre portion of Tract B -1A, U.S. Survey 4947 from C- Conservation to PL- Public Land Use, in order to allow the eventual development of a new Alaska Department of Fish & Game office and research building to be located on the same lot as the existing Kodiak Fisheries Research Center (KFRC). The applicant is the Kodiak Island Borough and the agent is Bob Scholze, Resource Management Officer. The location is 200 Trident Way and it is zoned C- Conservation. Cassidy stated the borough is adding on a piece of property adjacent to an existing lot to make it a larger lot for the construction of a new Fish & Game building on Near Island. Staff recommends the rnmmissinn make a rernmmendatinn to the Assembly for approval of the rezone 2/16/2011 P &Z Minutes Page 6 of 13 In response to COMMISSIONER JANZ' inquiry about the trails, Cassidy stated we couldn't find any information but COMMISSIONER WATKINS can probably give you more information. COMMISSIONER JANZ MOVED to recommend, according to KIBC 17.205, 17.50 and 17.130, the rezone of a 2.66 acre portion of Tract B -1A, U.S. Survey 4947 from C- Conservation to PL- Public Land Use, in order to allow the eventual development of a new Alaska Department of Fish & Game office and research building to be located on the same lot as the existing Kodiak Fisheries Research Center (KFRC); and to adopt the "Findings of Fact' in the staff report dated February 4, 2011 in support of this recommendation. The public hearing was opened & closed: There was no public testimony. COMMISSIONER WATKINS stated there are 2 main trail paths that come across this Tract 8-1; the first one picks up across from the scientist's housing at the fire hydrant where the trail leads into the woods and climbs up towards the adjacent lot where it says vacant. It runs into some switchbacks back towards the Near Island facility and then meanders the lot line running towards the corner of our new rezone up by the gazebo and then it runs into Rotary Park. The other one is down more towards the waterfront edge and follows the fence line put in by Trident Basin which is Tract F, U.S. Survey 2261 and follows around the dog leg in the fence on the side where were looking at the rezone and then curls up into the end of the parking lot for the existing building. The jilt of the conversation with staff today was that we don't put easements on borough land, and Watkins is not sure about that point. We put easements in right -of -ways and he's concerned that if we don't get easements on these trails as this land gets divided up and sold we are going to lose our footing on the trails. For this project to work it will have to come back to us again and then we can address easements for when Fish & Game take over that property we can get easements at that point. Watkins 'concerns now are to make sure we keep our easements on this lot The other thing is because we don't have easements for the trail we've lost several cycles of grants for trail improvements so if we have an easement that shows that the trail has been used for more than 10 years then we're open to grant money that's been on the table for the last 2 years. The board has been asking why we aren't doing this when we have people to do the work and money available. In response to COMMISSIONER SCHMITT'S inquiry of it was his understanding that the borough is going to retain this property and lease it to the state, similar to what they are doing next door, is that correct, Cassidy stated any disposal of land either by sale or lease has to come back to the commission for review. An easement is the right to cross someone else's land and you can't have a borough trail easement across a piece of borough land. If it becomes Fish & Game then that's the time to attach an easement He thinks once the Trails Plan is done that's the document adopted by the Assembly that shows that we have priority trails in the community. In response to COMMISSIONER JANZ' inquiry re: she read in the staff report that if where the building was built and it impeded a trail that every effort was going to be made to redirect the trails, is that correct, Cassidy stated that we have not found anything that shows the trails in relation to the buildings being constructed. The entire lot is not going to be developed and the thinking is that it isn't going impact the existing trails. COMMISSIONER KING told COMMISSIONER JANZ that what she's looking for is on page 3 of 9 in the lower right hand box that says an informal pedestrian trail will be realigned if necessary for the new development. COMMISSIONER WATKINS' stated the landscape architect and the building architect are aware of where both trails are. They are interested in having a junction from the building to log into that trail system for the people working there. FINDINGS OF FACT A. Findings as to need and justification for a change or amendments; A rezone of Tract B -1A United States Survey 4947 removes the administrative ambiguity that arises 2/16/2011 P &Z Minutes Page 7 of 13 due to a "split -lot zoning" configuration. A rezone of Tract B -1A United States Survey 4947 exemplifies good planning practices. B. Findings as to the effect a change or amendment would have on the ohiectives of the comprehensive play: and A rezone of Tract B -1A United States Survey 4947 is fully compatible with the objectives of the Kodiak Island Borough 2008 Plan Update. A rezone of Tract B -1A United States Survey 4947 is generally consistent with the objectives of the 1987 Near Island Comprehensive Development Plan. C. Recommendat ions as to the anoroval or disanoroval of the change or amendment The Kodiak Island Borough Planning & Zoning Commission recommends that the Kodiak Island Borough Assembly approve the rezone of that portion of Tract B -1A United States Survey 4947 currently zoned C - Conservation Zoning District to PL- Public Use Zoning District. ROLL CALL VOTE ON MOT /ON CARRIED 6-0 E) Case S11- 007. Request preliminary approval of the Vacation of a portion of the Perenosa Drive right -of -way, according to KIBC 16.60, a maximum of 30 feet in width, and predominantly affecting the southwest side of the right -of -way from the centerline between Tugidak Court and Sharatin Road per the sketch plan submitted on December 29, 2010. The applicant is Robert W. Barton, Et al. The location is 3390, 3410, and 3424 Tugidak Court, 3551 and 3573 Sitkinak Drive, 3333 and 3469 Sharatin Road and the zoning is R3- Multifamily Residential. Cassidy stated this case results from a number of contacts made by the Resource Management Officer to folks who are encroaching into the un -built right -of -way of Perenosa Drive. As a result of the letters we met with a number of owners on how to resolve the issue and one of the options was to request a vacation of the right -of -way. The Code requires the burden of proof is on the applicants to show that "there is no public value to the right of way." The commission has seen this request in the past and voted it down. Staff continues to have concerns about vacating the ROW. Staff contends that there remains public value in retention of this right of way: There is still a need for a secondary access in an area that only has one way in and one way out; and, there continues to be a need to do a road analysis for all the undeveloped ROW's to determine if there are alternatives. Staff recommends that the neighbors should work with the Resource Management Officer to see about acquiring a permit to use borough lands and not recommend to the assembly to vacate any of part of that right -of -way. In response to COMMISSIONER SCHMITT'S inquiry of the Strategic Plan that was adopted by the assembly that talks about Parks & Recreation Goals and Objectives -Item 1 says to evaluate and identify those lands under borough ownership that would be appropriate for developed or passive parks and recreation facilities, and then sub - paragraph A says review urban areas for potential neighborhood pocket parks in areas of growth, is this right -of -way the sort of thing you might be looking at, Cassidy stated we have a park of sorts along Katmai, another part of Perenosa where there is land set aside for a park so that's another kind of use these right -of -ways can be used. It's important because there aren't a lot of pocket parks or neighborhood parks in these areas and that certainly is a potential use. In response to CHAIR TORRES' inquiry of the park by the Christian School, that right -of -way was not vacated it's just that park is just built in the right -of -way, Cassidy said if you are talking about the Christian School and Katmai there's a basketball court and a community park in the right -of -way there and it was not vacated. In response to COMMISSIONER WATKINS' inquiry on the motion we have the vacation of a portion of Perenosa because the application was for a part of it but don't we have to vacate the whole of Perenosa to make that work, Cassidy stated that's correct, 30 foot in width, you can vote it down or make a motion to vacate the entire right -of -way. In response to COMMISSIONER WATKINS' inquiry if we can legally vacate part of the right -of -way or 2/16/2011 P &Z Minutes Page 8 of 13 PUBLIC HEARING FORM Ordinance No. FY2011 -13 Rezoning a Portion of Tract B -1A, U.S. Survey 4947 (Near Island ) From C- Conservation To PL- Public Use Zone. This is in support of the rezone. ❑ This is in opposition of the rezone. ❑ Other comments. Al Name: 4 f!iG' A/J / AL, /Oi f 0.1> / / AAIA (t 012 Residence Address: t Mailing Address: (Lay of J� 1%Y7 / AK [ " JC l "1 / L1� aAy � J7 Comments: // ✓ 14 . 15 "7 S s PoMS 7 / /AC IT; - J LUI �. Written comments may be submitted by email to niavierkodiakak.us, fax to 907 - 486 -9391, mail or hand delivered to the Borough Clerk's Office, 710 Mill Bay Road, Room 101, Kodiak, AK 99615 prior to 5 p.m. on Thursday, April 7, 2011. KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH AGENDA STATEMENT APRIL 7, 2011 REGULAR MEETING ITEM NO: 13.A.1 TITLE: Contract No. FY2011 -28 Kodiak High School Old Pool Reclamation Project. SUMMARY: Kodiak Island Borough Code 3.16.020 "Limitation of Manager's Authority" states that a contract exceeding $25,000 requires Assembly approval. This contract is for the Kodiak High School Old Pool Reclamation Project as shown in the construction documents prepared by Jensen Yorba Lott, Inc. The Construction Documents, Bid Documents and associated Addenda are available for review. This project is limited to filling in the old pool and pouring a concrete slab floor. The final use of the area is unknown at this stage of the design of the New KHS Addition and Renovation; however, this building is not being considered for demolition and any future use of the space will require this work be eventually completed. Accomplishing this work in advance of the new KHS construction allows this valuable area to be used during the course of construction for classroom, storage area, or as athletic space. The Pool Reclamation Project was approved in the 2005 Bond issue. Bids were received in response to KIB's Invitation to Bid dated February 9, 2011. Brechan Enterprises, Inc. was the lowest responsible bidder for the project. Bid tabulation is attached. FISCAL NOTES: Account No.: 420 -500 452 -150 05015 6 Amount Budgeted: $4,840,788 Expenditure Required: $260,699 APPROVAL FOR AGENDA: —tk j f , RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to authorize the manager to execute Contract No. FY2011 -28 with Brechan Enterprises, Inc. of Kodiak, Alaska for the Kodiak High School Old Pool Reclamation Project in an Amount not to exceed $260,699. c • -AIA Document AIOITM - 2007 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Contractor where the basis of payment is a Stipulated Sum AGREEMENT made as of the Eighteenth day of March in the year Two- Thousand Eleven (!n words, indicate day, month and year.) ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS: The author of this document has BETWEEN the Owner: added information needed for its (Name, legal status, address and other information) completion. The author may also have revised the text of the original AIA standard form. An Additions and Kodiak Island Borough Deletions Report that notes added 710 Mill Bay Road information as well as revisions to Kodiak, Alaska, 99615 the standard form text is available from the author and should be reviewed. A vertical line in the left margin of this document indicates and the Contractor: where the author has added (Name, legal status, address and other information) necessary information and where the author has added to or deleted Brechan Enterprises, Inc from the original AIA text. 2705 Mill Bay Road This document has important legal Kodiak, AK 99615 consequences. Consultation with an attorney is encouraged with respect to its completion or modification. for the following Project: AIA Document A201 -2007, (Name, location and detailed description) General Conditions of the Contract • for Construction, is adopted in this Kodiak High School Pool Reclamation document by reference. Do not use Kodiak, AK with other general conditions unless this document is modified. The Architect: (Name, legal status, address and other information) Jensen Yorba Lott Inc., 522 W. 10th St. Telephone Number: 907 586 1070 The Owner and Contractor agree as follows. AIA Document A101 — 2007. Copyright ®1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963. 1967, 1974, 1977, 1987, 1991, 1997 and 2007 by The American Init. Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA Document Is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized .1 • reproduction or distribution of this AIA Document, or any portion of It, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 13:09:22 on 03/21/2011 under Order No.6656200149_1 which expires on 04/14/2011, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1833709389) TABLE OF ARTICLES 1 THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS 2 THE WORK OF THIS CONTRACT 3 DATE OF COMMENCEMENT AND SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION 4 CONTRACT SUM 5 PAYMENTS 6 DISPUTE RESOLUTION • 7 TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION • 8 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS • 9 ENUMERATION OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS 10 INSURANCE AND BONDS ARTICLE 1 THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS The Contract Documents consist of this Agreement, Conditions of the Contract (General, Supplementary and other Conditions), Drawings, Specifications, Addenda issued prior to execution of this Agreement, other documents listed in this Agreement and Modifications issued atter execution of this Agreement, all of which form the Contract, and are as fully a part of the Contract as if attached to this Agreement or repeated herein. The Contract represents the entire and integrated agreement between the parties hereto and supersedes prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either written or oral. An enumeration of the Contract Documents, other than a Modification, appears in Article 9. ARTICLE 2 THE WORK OF THIS CONTRACT The Contractor shall fully execute the Work described in the Contract Documents, except as specifically indicated in the Contract Documents to be the responsibility of others. ARTICLE 3 DATE OF COMMENCEMENT AND SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION § 3,1 The date of commencement of the Work shall be the date of this Agreement unless a different date is stated below or provision is made for the date to be fixed in a notice to proceed issued by the Owner. (Insert the date of commencement if it differs from the date of this Agreement or, if applicable, state that the date will be fixed in a notice to proceed.) If, prior to the commencement of the Work, the Owner requires time to file mortgages and other security interests, the Owner's time requirement shall be as follows: § 3.2 The Contract Time shall be measured from the date of commencement, § 3.3 The Contractor shall achieve Substantial Completion of the entire Work not later than August 1, 2011 (Insert number of calendar days. Alternatively, a calendar date may be used when coordinated with the date of commencement. If appropriate, insert requirements for earlier Substantial Completion of certain portions of the Work) AIA Document A101 "' — 2007. Copyright m 1915, 1918, 1925. 1937. 1951, 1958, 1961. 1963, 1967, 1974, 1977, 1987, 1991, 1997 and 2007 by The American Init Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized 2 reproduction or distribution of this AIA Document, or any portion of It, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 13:09:22 on 03/21/2011 under Order No.6656208149 1 which empires on 04/14/2011, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1833709389) • Portion of Work Substantial Completion Date , subject to adjustments of this Contract Time as provided in the Contract Documents. (Insert provisions, if any, for liquidated damages relating to failure to achieve Substantial Completion on time or for bonus payments for early completion of the Work) Liquidated damages $200.00 per day ARTICLE 4 CONTRACT SUM § 41 The Owner shall pay the Contractor the Contract Sum in current funds for the Contractor's performance of the Contract. The Contract Sum shall be Two Hundred Sixty Thousand, Six Hundred Ninety Nine Dollars and Zero Cents ($ 260,699.00 ), subject to additions and deductions as provided in the Contract Documents. § 4.2 The Contract Sum is based upon the following alternates, if any, which are described in the Contract Documents and are hereby accepted by the Owner: (State the numbers or other identification of accepted alternates. If the bidding or proposal documents permit the Owner to accept other alternates subsequent to the execution of this Agreement, attach a schedule of such other • alternates showing the amount for each and the date when that amount expires) None § 4.3 Unit prices, if any: (Identify and state the unit price; state quantity limitations, if any, to which the unit price will be applicable.) • Item Units and Limitations Price Per Unit ($0.00) • § 4.4 Allowances included in the Contract Sum, if any: (Identify allowance and state exclusions, if any, from the allowance price.) Item Price ARTICLE 5 PAYMENTS § 5.1 PROGRESS PAYMENTS § 5.1.1 Based upon Applications for Payment submitted to the Architect by the Contractor and Certificates for Payment issued by the Architect, the Owner shall make progress payments on account of the Contract Sum to the Contractor as provided below and elsewhere in the Contract Documents. § 5.1.2 The period covered by each Application for Payment shall be one calendar month ending on the last day of the month, or as follows: § 5.1.3 Provided that an Application for Payment is received by the Architect not later than the day of a month, the Owner shall make payment of the certified amount to the Contractor not later than the day of the month. If an Application for Payment is received by the Architect after the application date fixed above, payment shall be made by the Owner not later than ( ) days after the Architect receives the Application for Payment. (Federal, state or local laws may require payment within a certain period of time) § 5.1.4 Each Application for Payment shall be based on the most recent schedule of values submitted by the Contractor in accordance with the Contract Documents. The schedule of values shall allocate the entire Contract Sum among the various portions of the Work. The schedule of values shall be prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the Architect may require. This schedule, unless objected to by the Architect, shall be used as a basis for reviewing the Contractor's Applications for Payment. • MA Document Al 01 — 2007. Copyright o 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1967, 1974, 1977, 1987, 1991, 1997 and 2007 by The American Init. Institute of Architects. AJI rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA Document Is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized 3 reproduction or distribution of this AIA Document, or any portion of It, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AEA software at 13:09:22 on 03/21/2011 under Order No.6656208149_1 which expires on 04/14/2011, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1833709389) § 5.1.5 Applications for Payment shall show the percentage of completion of each portion of the Work as of the end of the period covered by the Application for Payment. § 5.1.6 Subject to other provisions of the Contract Documents, the amount of each progress payment shall be computed as follows: .1 Take that portion of the Contract Sum properly allocable to completed Work as determined by • multiplying the percentage completion of each portion of the Work by the share of the Contract Sum allocated to that portion of the Work in the schedule of values, less retainage of percent ( %). Pending final determination of cost to the Owner of changes in the Work, amounts not in dispute shall be included as provided in Section 7.3.9 of ALA Document A201Tm -2007, General Conditions of the Contract for Construction; .2 Add that portion of the Contract Sum properly allocable to materials and equipment delivered and suitably stored at the site for subsequent incorporation in the completed construction (or, if approved in advance by the Owner, suitably stored off the site at a location agreed upon in writing), less retainage of percent ( %); .3 Subtract the aggregate of previous payments made by the Owner; and .4 Subtract amounts, if any, for which the Architect has withheld or nullified a Certificate for Payment as provided in Section 9.5 of AIA Document A201 -2007. § 5.1.7 The progress payment amount determined in accordance with Section 5.1.6 shall be further modified under the following circumstances: .1 Add, upon Substantial Completion of the Work, a sum sufficient to increase the total payments to the fulI amount of the Contract Sum, less such amounts as the Architect shall determine for incomplete • Work, retainage applicable to such work and unsettled claims; and (Section 9.8.5 of AIA Document A201 -2007 requires release of applicable retainage upon Substantial Completion of Work with consent of surety, ifany.) • .2 Add, if final completion of the Work is thereafter materially delayed through no fault of the Contractor, any additional amounts payable in accordance with Section 9.10.3 of AIA Document A201 -2007. • § 5.1.8 Reduction or limitation of retainage, if any, shall be as follows: (If it is intended prior to Substantial Completion of the entire Work, to reduce or limit the retainage resulting from the percentages inserted in Sections 5.1.6.1 and 5.1.6.2 above, and this is not explained elsewhere in the Contract Documents, insert here provisions for such reduction or limitation.) § 5.1.9 Except with the Owner's prior approval, the Contractor shall not make advance payments to suppliers for materials or equipment which have not been delivered and stored at the site. § 5.2 FINAL. PAYMENT § 5.2.1 Final payment, constituting the entire unpaid balance of the Contract Sum, shall be made by the Owner to the Contractor when .1 the Contractor has fully performed the Contract except for the Contractor's responsibility to correct Work as provided in Section 12.2.2 of AIA Document A201 -2007, and to satisfy other requirements, if any, which extend beyond final payment; and .2 a final Certificate for Payment has been issued by the Architect. § 5.2.2 The Owner's final payment to the Contractor shall be made no later than 30 days after the issuance of the Architect's final Certificate for Payment, or as follows: AIA Document A101 — 2007. Copydght ® 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1967, 1974, 1977, 1987, 1991, 1997 and 2007 by The American Init. Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: Thla AIA Document is protected by U.5. Copynght Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized 4 • reproduction or distribution of this AIA Document, or any portion of It, may result In severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 13:09:22 on 03/21/2011 under Order No.6656208149_1 which • expires on 04/14/2011, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1833709389) ARTICLE 6 DISPUTE RESOLUTION § 6.1 INITIAL DECISION MAKER The Architect will serve as Initial Decision Maker pursuant to Section 15.2 of AIA Document A201 -2007, unless • the parties appoint below another individual, not a party to this Agreement, to serve as Initial Decision Maker. • (If the parties mutually agree, insert the name, address and other contact information of the Initial Decision Maker, if other than the Architect) • • • § 6.2 BINDING DISPUTE RESOLUTION • For any Claim subject to, but not resolved by, mediation pursuant to Section 15.3 of AIA Document A201 -2007, the method of binding dispute resolution shall be as follows: (Check the appropriate box. If the Owner and Contractor do not select a method of binding dispute resolution below, or do not subsequently agree in writing to a binding dispute resolution method other than litigation, Claims will be resolved by litigation in a court of competent jurisdiction.) [ 1 Arbitration pursuant to Section 15.4 of AIA Document A201 -2007 [ 1 Litigation in a court of competent jurisdiction [ 1 Other (Spec) ARTICLE 7 TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION § 7.1 The Contract may be terminated by the Owner or the Contractor as provided in Article 14 of AIA Document A201 -2007. § 7.2 The Work may be suspended by the Owner as provided in Article 14 of AIA Document A201 -2007. • ARTICLE 8 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS § 8.1 Where reference is made in this Agreement to a provision of AIA Document A201 -2007 or another Contract Document, the reference refers to that provision as amended or supplemented by other provisions of the Contract Documents, § 8,2 Payments due and unpaid under the Contract shall bear interest from the date payment is due at the rate stated below, or in the absence thereof, at the legal rate prevailing from time to time at the place where the Project is located. (Insert rate of interest agreed upon, if any.) § 8.3 The Owner's representative: (Name, address and other information) Rick Gifford § 8.4 The Contractor's representative: (Name, address and other information) AIA Document A101 — 2007. Copyright m 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1967, 1974, 1977, 1987, 1991, 1997 and 2007 by The American In lt. Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA Document Is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized 5 reproduction or distribution of this AIA Document, or any portion of R, may result in severe chill and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 13:09:22 on 03/21/2011 under Order No.6555208149_1 which expires on 04/14/2011, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1833709389) • Jim Graham Brechan Enterprises, Inc • 2705 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, AK 99615 § 8,5 Neither the Owner's nor the Contractor's representative shall be changed without ten days written notice to the other party. • § 8.6 Other provisions: • ARTICLE 9 ENUMERATION OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS § 9.1 The Contract Documents, except for Modifications issued after execution of this Agreement, are enumerated in the sections below. § 9.1.1 The Agreement is this executed AIA Document A101 -2007, Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner • and Contractor. § 9.1.2 The General Conditions are AIA Document A201 -2007, General Conditions of the Contract for Construction. § 9.1.3 The Supplementary and other Conditions of the Contract: Document Title Date Pages § 9.1.4 The Specifications: (Either list the Specifications here or refer to an exhibit attached to this Agreement.) See Section 00011 of Project Manual for Table of Contents Section Title Date Pages • • § 9.1.5 The Drawings: • (Either list the Drawings here or refer to an exhibit attached to this Agreement.) See Section 00015 of Project Manual for List of Drawings • Number Title Date § 9.1.6 The Addenda, if any: Number Date Pages 1 3/2 1 Portions of Addenda relating to bidding requirements are not part of the Contract Documents unless the bidding requirements are also enumerated in this Article 9. § 9.1.7 Additional documents, if any, forming part of the Contract Documents: .1 AIA Document E201T'" -2007, Digital Data Protocol Exhibit, if completed by the parties, or the following: AIA Document A101"' — 2007. Copyright 0 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1983, 1967, 1974, 1977, 1987, 1991, 1997 and 2007 by The American Init. Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA Document Is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized 6 reproduction or distribution of this AIA Document, or any portion of It, may result In severs civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 13:09:22 on 03/21/2011 under Order No.6656208149_1 which e,ylres on 04/14/2011, and Is not for resale. User Notes: (1833709389) • .2 Other documents, if any, listed below: (List here any additional documents that are intended to form part of the Contract Documents. ALA Document A201 -2007 provides that bidding requirements such as advertisement or invitation to big Instructions to Bidders, sample forms and the Contractor's bid are not part of the Contract Documents unless enumerated in this Agreement. They should be listed here only if intended to be • part of the Contract Documents.) • ARTICLE 10 INSURANCE AND BONDS The Contractor shall purchase and maintain insurance and provide bonds as set forth in Article 11 of AIA Document • A201 -2007. • (State bonding requirements, if any, and limits of liability for insurance required in Article 11 of AJA Document A201- 2007.) • Type of insurance or bond Limit of liability or bond amount ($0.00) • This Agreement entered into as of the day and year first written above. • OWNER (Signature) CONTRACTOR (Signature) Rick Gifford, KIB Manager Jim Graham (Printed name and title) (Printed name and title) • • • AIA Document A101 "' — 2007. Copyright m 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1967, 1974, 1977, 1987, 1991, 1997 and 2007 by The American • hilt. Institute of Architects. All fights reserved. WARNING: This AIA Document Is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized 7 • • reproduction or distribution of this AIA Document, or any portion of it, may result In severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the • t maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 13:09 :22 on 03/21/2011 under Order No.6656208149_1 which expires on 04/14/2011, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1833709389) Bid Tabulation KHS Old Pool Reclamation Bid Opening: 3/8/2011 3:00 pm +� r e ; BASE.BID ,7otal Nor GENERAL CONTRACTOR' 3� (Base l+ Alts) F 2 , J..- . ... - ✓, r .. , is .. ,.... ....... •'4"... r n .. Estimate I 1 $ 250,000 Golden Alaska Excavating,LLC $ 199,892 $ ':199,892 Reject % Of Est 80% 2 Brechan',Enterprises, Inc $ < 260,699 $ , , , 260,699 Award Diff (Low) $ 60,807 % Diff (Low) 130.42% % Of Est 104% 3 Red Hook Construction, LLC , $ 283,000 $ j', 283,000 Diff (Low) $ 83,108 % Diff (Low) 141.58% % Of Est 113% 4 Alutiiq Int'I Solutions, LLC $ 336,955 $ 336,955 Diff (Low) $ 137,063 % Diff (Low) 168.57% % Of Est 135% $400,000 - -- $350,000 $300,000 -- -- $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 4 Series1 550,000 - - — — -- $_ `v v: 5 3 3 w 0 3 - o = o 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 O v J O = J O 0' J J O ' o m w w a v. 0 w o 0 4 5 o cc O O = o o 0 o C c° /%4 Kodiak Isla i 1 d Boro ugh >r r- r , /1 Engineering & Facilities Department f if y r� 710 Mill Bay Road W �` ``∎ ccza, Kodiak, Alaska 99615 r . Phone (907) 486 -9341 Fax (907) 486 -9347 t March 9, 2011 Mr. Rick Ryser Golden Alaska Excavating, LLC PO Box 8908 Kodiak, AK 99615 Dear Mr. Ryser, We opened your bid for the KHS Old Pool Reclamation Project and you were the apparent low bidder on the project, however I must inform you that we will are unable to award your firm the contract and must declare your bid non responsive due to a licensing issue. The contractor's license you provided lists your firm as a specialty contractor licensed to do work in excavation, roadwork and landscaping. See Alaska Administrative Code Section 12 AAC 21.110. PROHIBITIONS. A person registered as a specialty contractor may not undertake or offer to perform or claim to have the capacity to perform or submit a bid for a project which requires the use of a trade for which he is not registered. A General Contractor's license is required for this work as the scope in this project includes a substantial amount of concrete and a lesser amount of mechanical plumbing, carpentry and electrical work. We appreciate your interest in our project and encourage you to continue pursuing work with the Borough which you are licensed to perform. Your Bid Bond and Surety Bond will be promptly returned. Sincere err% - enneth W. Smith Project Manager KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH AGENDA STATEMENT APRIL 7, 2011 REGULAR MEETING ITEM NO: 13.B.1 TITLE: Resolution No. FY2011 -24 Supporting a Bill to End Requirements That Employers Who Terminate Some or All Participation in the Public Employees Retirement System of Alaska Pay Termination Costs and Making the Changes Retroactive. SUMMARY: This resolution was requested and recommended by the Alaska Municipal League to support changes to state regulations requiring costly termination studies when an employer eliminates a group, or department or classification of employees. FISCAL NOTES: Account No.: Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Required: �/ APPROVAL FOR AGEND j RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to adopt Resolution No. FY2011 -24. 1 Introduced by: Borough Manager 2 Requested by: Alaska Municipal League 3 Drafted by: Alaska Municipal League Introduced on: 04/07/2011 4 Adopted on: 5 6 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH 7 RESOLUTION NO. FY 2011 -24 8 9 A RESOLUTION OF THE KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ASSEMBLY 10 SUPPORTING A BILL TO END REQUIREMENTS THAT EMPLOYERS WHO 11 TERMINATE SOME OR ALL PARTICIPATION IN THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' 12 RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF ALASKA PAY TERMINATION COSTS, AND 13 MAKING THE CHANGES RETROACTIVE 14 15 WHEREAS, the Alaska State Legislature, in SB 125, helped Alaska's PERS employers 16 tremendously by adopting the flat statutory 22% rate of salary to help fund current costs and 17 the unfunded liability of the PERS system; and 18 19 WHEREAS, our legislators, in crafting SB 125 struggled hard to come up with a fair and 20 equitable solution to a problem that most of them did not create. Further, in crafting SB 125, 21 legislators never envisioned, intended, nor did they want to create any inequitable financial 22 damage to any PERS member employer, nor negatively interfere with the current or future 23 delivery of any member's services or programs because of SB 125, which the termination 24 studies law does do; and 25 26 WHEREAS, 2 AAC 35.235. Calculation of termination costs states: (a) An employer that 27 proposes to terminate coverage of a department, group, or other classification of employees 28 under AS 39.35.615 or 39.35.957, or terminate participation of the employer under AS 29 39.35.620 or 39.35.958, must have a termination study completed by the plan actuary to 30 determine the actuarial cost to the employer for future benefits due employees whose 31 coverage is terminated. And (b): In addition to the costs calculated in (a) ...the employer 32 under AS 39.35.620 or 39.35.958, is required to pay to the plan until the past service liability 33 of the plan is extinguished an amount calculated by applying the current past service rate 34 adopted by the board to salaries of the terminated employees as required by AS 39.35.625 35 (a). This payment shall be made each payroll period or the employer may enter into a 36 payment plan acceptable to the administrator for each fiscal year; and 37 38 WHEREAS, if a PERS employer reduces its employee count because it made a decision to 39 alter or suspend one of its programs or services, per 2 AAC 35.235 PERS might send it three 40 bills. The first bill will be for the cost of doing a termination study. The second bill will be what 41 the study says you owe the System, due to the employee change(s) you made. The third bill, 42 the big bill, is the one that will require the employer to pay the past service cost (PSC) on 43 each position's salary PERS said needed to be opted out of PERS. The employer will be 44 required to pay the PSC (currently 18.63 %) on the salary(s) of the position(s) PERS said the 45 employer needed to opt out, until the unfunded obligation is paid off, maybe 30 years from 46 now. These three bills cumulatively can run from hundreds of thousands of dollars to several 47 millions of dollars; and 48 Kodiak Island Borough Resolution No. FY2011 -24 Pape 1 of 3 49 WHEREAS, the underlying fear that certain employers would purposely act in a manner 50 that jeopardized payment of the unfunded obligation, and thus shrink the salary base that 51 pays off the unfunded obligations, has simply not happened. The total PERS salary base 52 must be sustained and have reasonable growth, which it has to the tune of about 19% since 53 the 6/30/2008 last pay period floor was set; and 54 55 WHEREAS, the future financial stability of PERS employers, and their ability to efficiently 56 and effectively manage the delivery of their programs and services, is being directly impacted 57 and undermined by 2 AAC 35.235; and 58 59 WHEREAS, equitable and consistent application of the State's termination law does not 60 seem to be occurring, nor likely can it ever occur given the uniqueness of all PERS 61 employers' positions. A law like this that has such a material financial impact on PERS 62 employers should at a minimum be able to be fairly, equitably, and consistently applied to all 63 PERS employers, yet the Division of Retirement and Benefits has taken the position that the 64 State, with half of the PERS salary base is exempt from termination studies and their financial 65 impacts; and 66 67 WHEREAS, there is an inescapably inequitable impact to small PERS employers. This 68 State law, or its application by PERS creates a clear and unconscionable inequitable impact 69 on small PERS employers, versus larger PERS employers. Many smaller communities only 70 have "one" employee for a program or service. If they lose a grant, or simply are faced with 71 budget constraints and they have to cut a person, say a nurse in a school, they'd be required 72 to have a termination study done, then pay all of the related costs because they actually cut a 73 "function or a group"; and 74 75 WHEREAS, termination studies negatively impact our decision, and our ability to accept 76 grants because of the potential future liability. Grant funded positions may become subject to 77 the termination studies, once the positions are terminated due to grant funding ending. 78 Employers will find themselves paying the past service cost rate on former grant funded 79 position salaries with other revenues. Essentially, if an employer accepts a grant it is possible, 80 depending upon the circumstances, that once those grant funded positions are ended that 81 employer will need to use other dollars to pay the PSC on those former grant funded salaries 82 that the employer is no longer paying; and 83 84 WHEREAS, there are no offsets taken into account for salary increases in one area, for 85 decreases in other areas. In other words, the ability for entities to adjust their programs and 86 services to meet their constituent's needs is negatively impacted. If an employer needs to cut 87 in Area A, and add in Area B, that employer could find itself paying the PSC rate times the 88 salary(s) it is no longer paying in Area A because it shifted its employees to Area B where 89 there is more need, whether driven by local need or a mandate; and 90 91 WHEREAS, over time, more and more resources will go toward paying for positions that no 92 longer exist than go to the delivery of services such as fire protection, law enforcement, 93 teaching, recreational services, landfill services, library services, flood control services, 94 emergency response services, and the list goes on from here. Once you start shifting 95 employee resources from one area of responsibility to another, you start a negative 96 downward spiraling in your programs and services; and 97 98 WHEREAS, an employer will pay more toward the unfunded obligation every pay period on 99 positions that no longer exist than they will for existing paid positions. This is true because the 100 rate set by statute is capped at 22 %. The 22% first covers the current normal cost rate then Kodiak Island Borough Resolution No. FY2011 -24 • Page 2 of 3 101 the difference is applied to the unfunded obligation. The current (FY '11) normal cost rate is 102 9.33 %; therefore, an employer pays 11.67% times the working employee's salary toward the 103 unfunded obligation. This same employer is required to pay 18.63% times the salary of an 104 employee they are no longer paying toward the unfunded obligation. That employer is paying 105 almost 7% more for positions that no longer exist because of the unfunded obligation than it 106 pays on salary dollars for existing positions; and 107 108 WHEREAS, termination studies nullify the intent of SB 125 that employers pay the exact 109 same rate. It is clear that one result of these termination studies is that different employers will 110 in fact be paying different net rates, and therefore, there will not be a single uniform 111 contribution rate for PERS employers. The adoption of SB 125 was based on the 112 acknowledgement that we do not have a single- agent, multiple employer PERS system, but 113 rather we have had a consolidated un- equitable cost share system. The intent of SB 125 was 114 that all employers would pay the same exact rate. That cannot happen when each employer 115 pays a different termination cost amount, or pays none at all; and 116 117 WHEREAS, the Borough supports a sustainable salary base to pay off the PERS unfunded 118 obligations, and 119 120 WHEREAS, the termination language in SB 125 was a solution to a problem that never 121 materialized, and it's not needed. The negative consequences, the additional charges and the 122 payments that result from the termination language, were never contemplated or intended by 123 the legislature, and they are destructive; and 124 125 WHEREAS, A.S. 39.35.625, that requires termination studies, and any other similar 126 statutes or regulations, should be repealed. 127 128 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, THAT THE ASSEMBLY OF THE KODIAK ISLAND 129 BOROUGH while supporting a sustainable salary base to pay off the PERS unfunded 130 obligation, believe that AS 39.35.625 and any other similar statutes or regulations that require 131 termination studies, should be repealed and supports adoption and passage of a bill removing 132 termination study requirements from the law. 133 134 ADOPTED BY THE ASSEMBLY OF THE KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH 135 THIS DAY OF 2011 136 137 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH 138 139 140 141 ATTEST: Jerome M. Selby, Borough Mayor 142 143 144 145 Nova M. Javier, MMC, Borough Clerk Kodiak Island Borough Resolution No. FY2011 -24 Page 3 of 3 Public Hearing Item 7 -A P&Z March 16, 2011 Image Overlay Request:ARezone, according CC) KIBC IIV.205.030.A, pE3�Case OD consider@ rezone CQl(ol3op4O ',b9 at §34 rem GM-Rural Residential oN- 60 Re-Multifamily Residential, Bruce I, Lila Beehler gaILIGeig9B B- Business G R3 Multifamily Residential. $ E10 located a� M a r - 3218. S� 1 a /1 t ' . , t . 1' ::;; „,-11,;(4 c �• f �1 r ; 1 LL r Q' p "' f ! r t e ' : , r� ° a ttrO. r r y'•� :\ y + t om ` �W 2 *It, `I e /7 �! �� r�,'. � t l'Yti� F � 9„ y "•� ` � rF `7� ') d krti , r•1 *k y 4t f6 .f ' . AN, ) r m t �� , - , 4'ti,U• ' S + i '. , P ' , 44 • i- 1 YV > .t n ■ r 9 l ,, F 4 1 t,� 7 r 7.'h.. G .f. . N w i --.,, F n p 7 ® P - • V . i ." j o t : �' -� . E r Q,. r t t 1 y 1 1 j II ;`i t ,K Z y R �� r �. ', `A i rs { F � sr gowt^f , ti k 5 cc 4' { a ' T „). 43 e i 4.o • sue . a • ° ' 1 r I ■ ''� x 6 9 '� wPi6 s t 4 + r I I I , -- 1 " .o' 2 , �j � fI�• '" y , R"e Y1g � 'r r � rr?L1 4 f d �. I I . % 4 r: CTS r t . ,{(�/ ant s e T a iS� 1 t � ' ' - 1 k r g r y r i � A".* . Q i R . 1 i' , '� ,tt A s 4 r kit �e,, le l -ffr. tr * P '• ' ` k C l bs '' � ,,,I • rr 1--• , t 1 4-, � 'kr `- x 4 � a , a . ;4 3 . , _ 1 i t t • J •, If ;.: . Y b ^� 9 +� 4. $ ' a ; f n\p: r y ` � � �f ' � ? ♦ � `j 0 , ,,, Wit I n 1 a1 �, r 5 • = 1. ,r i � r r ei • 4. Di v R 3 Y A / t�. ' el .r •� • �1 5' / n e . P r tlg a 7 ” / rr r a' Vii `t-, • .'x'13 a ,' ' t * h e 1 , 4 f. r •, - r , ' , ” d E : . • j a 9 �. t� 4k '11‘1/2i e'. •.\ -1" . 3 ,,..Arc... �.�4 • 9 , 4 ln y w c i 17,#.: '' 5 r t, ', > y ' 4 d�'7 q V tn L 19 t t - yJ i .es i J t 4B Kodiak Island Borough GIS System o + ` ne 0 85 170 340 510 680 1 . Feet S Thus map was prepared from the Kodiak Island Borough's GIS System. It is provided th p rp o s of Iocation of eM within the Kodiak Island Borough This map does not represent a survey. More information about the mapping data can bfor e obta u ned by e i contacting the the Kodiak general Island Boroug a prop Ir Department at (BO]) dfifi -9333 Case No. 11 - 014 Introduction - Page 1 of 4 Public Hearing Item 7 -A P&Z March 16, 2011 .. Kodiak Island Borough Zoning Map W . . E ri 1 N. n Community Development Department ►y r Zoning Request: f Rezone, according m KIBC 9T.205.030.A, m consider@ rezone COLCg D92 Cell N=2 air] © from p Case D ddeOcCrii6 PM Ru al Residential off- Q° R3- Multifamily Residential, Bruce 03 Lila Beehler @rhII:0 CiUQ�Ie from B- Business m R3- Multifamily Residential. a located $i li Mc& I.G M EL $P � O M o s 1 250 1 500 Q Feet 7 0 0 1P 7 �� Legend S 3463 n, S 3218 is+ 3259 V 3 5 e, 41,y0 lil till P 32 `d, 0 J oil- 0 �P � 4- r G 3325 ❑ y N y '0 33 .r '05 . ,,p 4 - N. Q'L 325'5 1 ., V - ,`Q- �tib^ 422 0 �. 1 O' n 9`10-0 ! l!. 3 1 1 ti \rye/ 3,37 N s w • , •, 31,A y.55 a ^P 'NEl/2J G rh 4 /1 /2J ■P USS 1682 o ^ o • `� c `a •• 4% In I . Zoning Legend Public Use Lands I I Rural Residential 1 Multi Family Residential n Light Industrial ® Watershed 1 1 Rural Residential 2 I 1 Business I Rural Neighborhood Commercial Conservation Single Family Residential TT Retail Business ( Urban Neighborhood Commercial I Rural Residential I Two Family Residential I I Industrial Natural Use This map was prepared from the Kodiak Island Borough's GIS System. It is provided for the purpose of showing the general location of a property within the Kodiak Island Borough. This map does not represent a survey. More information about the mapping data can be obtained by contacting the Kodiak Island Borough IT Department at (907) 086-9333. Case No. 11 -014 Introduction - Page 3 of 4 Public Hearing Item 7 -A P &Z March 16, 2011 Request: UQ Rezone, according 02 KIBC 9V.205.030.A, @EINEM Location Qof consider p rezone df M 041 PM entd©A P b E Case Q iN o 6 mil Residential 31:0 R3- Multifamily Residential, Bruce b Lila Beehler and [Lca&I B- Business 0 R3- Multifamily Residential. de located Si) at amy gra Fa II ail I 11 : , . =tr.® 7 Tfittweir 4o N iii. stica . 0- ® O cf s^ 1PP a kat th._ Odra : =pi P k ,,,y i Legend I its° 4 Illllll� S ubject Parcel San 00 r c463 91i 5 ® ®®4 ®S 32p 8� �� � 4.4 it ii- tttavA • .' ''14 P ® 3425 . sa0 �� E A � �atil swvzJ , USS 1682 tiP SS 3512 Ta Ai 1 frt40 RACT e R � SA R' . c€ a • k , r. 4 : 4 : 4 A -6 Kodiak Island Borough GIS System N �. a 0 225 450 900 1,350 1,800 Feet S This map was prepared from the Kodiak Island Borough's GIS System. It is provided for the purpose of showing the general location of a property within the Kodiak Island Borough. This map does not represent a survey. More information about the mapping data can be obtained by contacting the Kodiak Island Borough IT Department at (907) 486 -9333. Case No. 11 -014 Introduction - Page 2 of 4 Public Hearing Item 7 -A P8Z March 16, 2011 00 0 0 0 o� 0 k .\\ Case No. 11 -014 Introduction - Page 4 of 4 710 Mill Bay Rd., Room 205, KODIAK, AK 99615 -6398 (907) 486 -9363 - FAX (907) 46t10! Item 7 -A www.kib.co.kodiak.ak.us a rcn 16, 2011 Applicant Information Property Information /(2 33? c; io ?!) : R /Y620 7coo /o Property ID Number /s 33z5 'mat OE y PA Property owner's name P4-11 eC . 1 7rwt-e., a -.d4 la &.e A ker L ._:.,.....;,.,,.t oi.., J. 3211, Legal Description Property owner's mailing address 0 F$6 M" /Za ed Current Zoning: �.m.. .A45 /Pre SS City -J State Zip A Applicable Comprehensive Plan:. tool Ir 4�a 5,84 q7/o /s Year of Plan adoption: Home phone Work Phone E -mail Addr. Present Use of Property: ReS / / wi 14 9o7 /aoge 707 /0763374 k ekler re...,f„ A. Ap).ra. .con, Agent's name (If applicable) NA Agent's mailing address n Proposed Use ofProperty: /SeS7 w / in,, /1 n e #a /.S • • 4 ( 5e . 4'74 Scat' el�/7 /.(IOYI City State Zip [ 1 -, da......... I Home phone Work Phone E -mail Addr. (Note: Use additional sheets, if needed, to provide a complete description of the proposed request.) Applicant Certification I hereby certify as the property owner /authorized agent that this application for Planning and Zoning Commission review is true and complete to the best of my knowledge and that it is submitted In accordance with the requirements of the applicable Kodiak Island Borough Code, which includes a detailed site plan for variance and conditional use requests and which may include optional supporting documentation as indicated below. Additional Narrative /History / As -bullt Survey i Photographs _ Maps _ Other • C g/t r/ L( � f .1✓A / ,�r•,.> /// /O f // Property Owner's Signature Date Authorized Agent's Signature Date 1 A development plan for one or more lots on which is shown the existing and proposed conditions of the lot, including topography, vegetation, drainage, flood plains, wetlands, and waterways; landscaping and open spaces; walkways; means of ingress and egress; circulation; utility services; structures and buildings; signs and lighting; berms, buffers, and screening devices; surrounding development; and any other information that reasonably may be required in order that an informed decision can be made by the approving authority. (Source: The New Illustrated Book of Development Definitions, ©1993 by Rutgers University) ,g 7 ( 7& STAFF USE ONLY P�; 1 PAYMENT VERIFICATION Code Section(s) Involved: ( � , 2l 1 NOV 10 200 *zoning Change, Variance (KIBC 17.66.020) $250.00 • Fee Schedule: Conditional Use Permit (KIBC 17.67.020.B) $250.00 Kodiak Island Bo - ougger MB Assembly Resolution Other (appearance requeS(s, site plan review, etc.) $150.0Uinance De r artrrtent Eff. July 1, 2005) Zoning change from ;Qj ; to g3 / 7 (KIBC 17.72.030 and 030.0.' 1 ` / / • 1 - L•a%than 1.75 acres $350 / = / 1.76 to 5.00 acres $730710 Application received by: i 1 / t; j 5.01 to 40.00 acres $1.000.00 '/� _ i / 40.1)1 acres or more $1,500.00 Staff signature I L ON Case No. 11 -014 Application - Page 1 of 14 Public Hearing Item 7 -A P8Z March 16 2011 Nov. 7, 2010 We were asked to write concerning the history of the property, Lot 01 of subdivision of Lot G, US Survey No. 3218, which we purchased over 7 years ago. Doyle and Charlotte Hatfield were the previous owners who purchased the yellow, single story house from the Barker family in 1971. The property is approximately 72 acre and was used as residential property. At some point Mr. Hatfield thought the properties in the area were either to be annexed into the city or brought into compliance through rezoning. Lot G1 was zoned commercial at Hatfield's request as they had moved on the property. Doyle Hatfield's daughter's family occupied the yellow house and were planning on building a much larger home on the 01 property to house their growing family. A two story, 4,000 sq. ft. structure was built on the property. Mr. Hatfield's son - in -law, Steve McCormick hoped to turn the lower portion of the home into a auto garage after he retired. The lower area was never used as a business according to Mr. Hatfield's knowledge .McCormick's grown daughter lived in the downstairs mother -in -law apartment for awhile. During this period the McCormicks still lived in the upstairs of the home. They rented out the yellow house on the front of the property. The McCormick's moved out sometime in the 1990's. From the time the McCormick's moved out until we purchased the property in 2003, the Hatflelds rented out both the large home and the small yellow house. When my wife and I purchased the homes we got permits and upgraded the houses to meet the residential loan requirements. This sums up the history of the property- We are requesting this property to be rezoned from commercial to .R3. We request this on the fact that all properties bordering us have residential occupants. Also, the fact that this property has never been used commercially and we have no intent to use it in that manner for which it is presently zoned. Thank you for your attention and consideration in this matter. Respectfully, Bruce Beehler Case No. 11 -014 Application - Page 2 of 14 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH AGENDA STATEMENT APRIL 7, 2011 REGULAR MEETING ITEM NO: 13.C.1 TITLE: Ordinance No. FY2011 -14 Rezoning Lot G -1, U.S. Survey 3218, from B- Business to R3- Multifamily Residential, and Lots D -2, H -1, H -2 and G -2, U.S. Survey 3218, from RR1 -Rural Residential One to R3- Multifamily Residential. SUMMARY: This case was originally requested by petitioners Bruce and Lila Beehler for the rezone of Lot G1, U.S. Survey 3218 from B- Business to R3- Multifamily Residential. After a public hearing at the January 19, 2011, regular meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission moved to expand the scope of the request to consider the additional rezoning of Lots D -2, H -1, H -2 and G -2, U.S. Survey 3218, from RR1 -Rural Residential One to R3- Multifamily Residential. The KIB Planning and Zoning Commission held a second public hearing on March 16, 2011, for this rezone request to address the five (5) adjoining lots that were included in the expanded scope of this review. After the second public hearing, the commission moved to recommend the rezoning of Lot G -1, U.S. Survey 3218 from B- Business to R3- Multifamily Residential and Lots D -2, H -1, H -2 and G -2 from RR1 -Rural Residential One to R3- Multifamily Residential. In making the recommendation, the commission found that this area has been largely overlooked in the most recent comprehensive plan update and the land use designation for this area generally follows the pre- existing zoning from the 2005 zoning map. In considering the rezone the commission noted in findings that all of the lots adjacent to the rezone area are zoned B- Business while this area remains a rural residential enclave. A rezone to R3- Multifamily Residential will provide new development opportunities that are appropriate for this location along an arterial street and should be more compatible with the prevailing commercial zoning and development surrounding these five (5) lots considered for rezone. FISCAL NOTES: Account No.: Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Required: APPROVAL FOR AGENDA: RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to adopt Ordinance No. FY2011 -14 in first reading to advance to public hearing at the next regular meeting of the Assembly. 44 Section 3: Lots D -2, H -1, H -2 and G -2, U.S. Survey 3218 are hereby rezoned from 45 RR1 -Rural Residential One to R3- Multifamily Residential. 46 47 Section 4: The findings of the Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning 48 Commission are hereby confirmed as follows: 49 50 17.72.020 A. Findings as to the need and justification for a change or 51 amendment. 52 Four of the five lots in the rezone area are currently zoned RR1 -Rural 53 Residential One which is a large lot low density single - family residential 54 zoning district. This zoning appears to be out of place in the context of 55 being totally surrounded by B- Business zoned land. In addition, the lots are 56 located in the urban area along a developed arterial street with excellent 57 access to utilities, schools and services in the area. The fifth lot is zoned B- 58 Business, but developed as residential that is similar to the other lots in the 59 aforementioned RR1 zoning district. The petitioners of this fifth lot 60 requested the rezone initially, but good zoning practice would discourage 61 the treatment of this one lot to a different set of development standards than 62 any of the surrounding lots currently enjoy. 63 64 Changing the zoning of these five lots to R3 would not have a major impact 65 on the availability of either the RR1 -Rural Residential One or B- Business 66 zoned land. Generally, multi - family residential is considered a good fit with 67 commercially zoned land as it is an allowed use in some form in all urban 68 commercial zones where municipal water and sewer are available. There 69 may be some concerns about the mixed use nature of the area surrounding 70 the rezone area (B- Business zoned land). On the whole, however, the 71 rezone has more positive attributes than negative, hence the 72 recommendation to make the zoning change from RR1 -Rural Residential 73 One and B- Business to R3- Multi- family Residential. 74 75 17.72.020 B. Findings as to the Effect a Change or Amendment would 76 have on the Objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 77 The 2008 Kodiak Island Borough Comprehensive Plan Update 78 recommends this area for Rural Residential for four of the five affected lots. 79 The fifth lot is recommended to remain Commercial /Business. While it is 80 appropriate to give the plan due deference in these matters, it is clear from 81 review that these designations are not fully consistent with the kinds of land 82 uses currently developed in the area and that the plan designation is largely 83 derived from the prior zoning map. Clearly no one was specifically 84 concerned with the zoning of this area at the time the last major plan update 85 was being compiled. 86 Kodiak Island Borough Ordinance No. FY2011 -14 Page 2 of 3 87 Investigation of the rezone indicates a substantial disconnect between the 88 prevailing commercial zoning and development context of the rezone area. 89 This can only be remedied by a deviation from the express designations of 90 the comprehensive plan. This, therefore, may be an exceptional situation 91 whereby the due deference accorded the plan must yield to the more 92 practical and realistic considerations pertaining to the rezone area and how 93 this area can be of benefit to the overall community in the light of future 94 development and use potential represented by these five lots. 95 96 ADOPTED BY THE ASSEMBLY OF THE KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH 97 THIS DAY OF 2011 98 99 100 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH 101 102 103 104 Jerome M. Selby, Borough Mayor 105 106 ATTEST: 107 108 109 110 Nova M. Javier, MMC, Borough Kodiak Island Borough Ordinance No. FY2011 -14 Page 3 of 3 • N t S"Fo, • L. !Icy t HH, f Fr c- iG S' Public Hearing Item 7 -A P &Z March 16, 2011 ct n c y N',, Kodiak Island trough • • 9 .` a f c /�� R. . 710 MILL BAY ROAD ti• KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 -6340 ,2'i � {�; PHONE (907) 486 -5736 ;-• I . " July 17, 1986 Doyle Hatfield 1516 Larch Street Kodiak, Alaska 99615 RE: CASE 86 -054. Request for an exception from Section 17.21.020 (Permitted Uses) of the Borough Code to permit a single - family dwelling unit to locate within an existing business building on a lot that already contains a separate single - family residence. Located in a B-- Business Zoning District on a Portion of Tract G-1, U.S. Survey 3218; 3325 Mill Bay Road. Dear Mr. Hatfield: The Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting on July 16, 1986, granted your request for the exception cited above and adopted the following findings of fact in support of their decision: 1. That the use as proposed in the application, or under appropriate conditions or restrictions, will not (A) endanger the public's health, safety or general welfare, (B) be inconsistent with the general purposes and intent of this title and (C) adversely impact other properties or uses in the neighborhood. A. It appears that the proposed use will not endanger the public's health, safety or general welfare. The residence will be located within an existing building that was originally designed to accommodate a residential unit. The existing business and residential uses of the property will not change. The addition of one dwelling unit will not substantially increase traffic in the area or detract from the commercial land uses of the site and surrounding area. The addition of a residential unit will also require compliance with building, fire and plumbing codes. B. The proposed use should be consistent with the general purposes and intent of Title 17 and with the specific description and intent of Chapter 17.21, the Business District. The business use present on the property will remain. Exceptions are provided for in Title 17 to allow certain land uses to locate in districts where they are not normally allowed. It is interesting to note that apartments (more than three units) are permitted in the Case No. 11 -014 Application - Page 3 of 14 • Public Hearing Item 7 -A P&Z March 16, 2011 Kodiak Island Borough Doyle Hatfield July 17, 1986 Page Two B -- Business Zoning District and that a single — family residence is permitted through a conditional use permit, but two dwelling units or duplexes are not addressed at all. C. The proposed use does not appear as though it will adversely impact other properties or uses in the area. There is adequate area on the lot for two additional parking spaces and the immediately adjoining lots contain a duplex and a mobile home park. An appeal of this decision may be initiated by any person or party aggrieved by filing a written notice of appeal with the City Clerk within ten days of the date of the Commission's decision. The notice of appeal must -state the specific grounds for the appeal. Therefore, the Commission's decision will not be final and effective until ten days following the decision. Failure to utilize this exception within 12 months after its effective date shall cause its cancellation. Please bring this letter with you if you need to come into our office to obtain .zoning compliance for any construction on your lot. If you have any questions about the action of the Commission, please contact me. Sinc ely, Robert H. ederson, Associate Planner Community Development Department cc: Case File Case No. 11 -014 Application - Page 4 of 14 Public Hearing Item 7 -A P &Z March 16, 2011 H ( 5 +o ✓N Pt z ., I e;5 not interfere with safe traffic flow, visibility or J /' off- street parking and because many other walla, fences and the like in Kodiak are located in rights -of -way. 3. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare. Granting of the variance will not result in damage or prejudice to other properties in the area and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare. The property on the side where the deck is proposed is a cemetery. The applicant has obtained permission from the City of Kodiak to place the wall in the right-of -way and as discussed above, this location will not interfere with safe traffic flow, visibility or access. 4. The grantin. of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives o the Comprehensive Plan. Granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the comprehensive plan which designates this area for residential development. A deck and a landscaping wall will not change the land use or permitted density. 5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance. In this instance, actions of the applicant have not caused the conditions from which relief is being sought by a variance. The variance request will be decided prior to construction of the deck. 6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the district involved. A deck on a residential structure is permitted in this land use district. Landscaping is permitted in all land use districta. CHAIRMAN RENNELL recessed the meeting for ten minutes. CHAIRMAN RENNELL reconvened the meeting at 9:28 P.N. F) CASE 86 -054. Request for an exception from Section 17.21.020 (Permitted Uses) of the Borough Code to permit a single- family dwelling unit to locate within an existing business building on a lot that already contains a separate single-gamily residence. Located in a B-- Business Zoning District on a Portion of tract G-1, U.S. Survey 3218; 3325 Mill Bay Road. (Doyle Hatfield) BOB PEDERSON indicated 28 public hearing notices were mailed for this case and 1 was returned that addressed the "old yellow house." Staff recommended approval of this request. Regular Session Closed. Public Hearing Opened: Seeing and hearing none. Public Rearing Closed. Regular Session Opened. COMMISSIONER HEINRICRS MOVED TO GRANT a request for an exception from Section 17.21.020 of the Borough Code to permit a single- family residence to locate in an existing business building on a lot in the B-- Business Zoning District that already contains separate single- family residential structure, a Portion of Tract G-1, U.S. Survey 3218 and to adopt the findings contained in the staff report as "Findings of Fact" for this case. The motion was seconded and CARRIED by majority roll call vote. Commissioners Knudsen, Rennell and Knight voted "no." P & 2 MINUTES 11 JULY 16, 1986 Case No. 11 -014 Application - Page 5 0114 Public Hearing Item 7 -A P&Z March 16, 2011 FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the use ae proposed in the application, or under appropriate conditions or restrictions, will not (A) endanger the public's health, safety or general welfare, (8) be inconsistent with the general purposes and intent of this title and (C) adversely impact other properties or uses in the neighborhood. A. It appears that the proposed use will not endanger the public's health, safety or general welfare. The residence will be located within an existing building that was originally designed to accommodate a residential unit. The existing business and residential uses of the property will not change. The addition of one dwelling unit will not substantially increase traffic in the area or detract from the commercial land uses of the site and surrounding area. The addition of a residential unit will also require compliance with building, fire and plumbing codes. 8. The proposed use should be consistent with the general purposes and intent of Title 17 and with the specific description and intent of Chapter 17.21. the Business District. The business use present on the property will remain. Exceptions are provided for in Title 17 to allow certain land uses to locate in districts where they are not normally allowed. It is interesting to note that apartments (more than three units) are permitted in the 8— Business Zoning District and that a single- family residence is permitted through a conditional use permit, but two dwelling units or duplexes are not addressed at all. C. The proposed use does not appear as though it will adversely impact other properties or uses in the area. There is adequate area on the lot for two additional parking spaces and the immediately adjoining lots contain a duplex and a mobile home park. G) CASE 86 -055. Request for an exception from Section 17.33.020 Permitted Usee) of the Borough Code to permit a two -story 40 -foot by 70 -foot Boy Scout Lodge containing a caretaker duelling unit to locate in a PL— Public Use Lands Zoning District. A Portion of Lot 1A. Tract A, U.S. Survey 3465 containing approximately 4 acres and located along the south shore of Island Lake. (BPOE #1772 /Kodiak Island Borough) BOB PEDERSON indicated 59 public heating notices were mailed for this case and 1 was returned, in favor of this request. Staff recommended approval of this request. Regular Session Closed. Public Hearing Opened: EDWARD COE, representing BPOE 11772, appeared before the Commission and expressed support for this request. A discussion ensued amongst the Commissioners and Mr. Coe. Public Hearing Closed. Regular Session Opened. COMMISSIONER ANDERSON MOVED TO GRANT a request for an exception from Section 17.33.020 of the Borough Code to permit a two -story 40 -foot by 70 -foot Boy Scout lodge containing a caretaker dwelling unit to locate in a PL— Public Use Lands Zoning District on a portion of Lot 1A, Tract A, U.S. Survey 3465 and to adopt the findings contained in the staff report as "Findings of Fact" for this case. The motion wee seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll call vote. P 6 Z MINUTES 12 JULY 16, 1986 Case No. 11 -014 Application - Page 6 of 14 Public Hearing Item 7 -A - --- --__._ tills II II11 -7 - r.. tl��NIl. ;! vV ) D.,/ - / \ It -1 '� At' p ` l,. \ r 5‘ E 0. �a u' N / aLY, y 8, LOT e rti _ l \ \ 0 ?2 a 95.5 S. \� 9 /`' \ / � .,,,--ti o` ' \� a= )� u �� • _ �; \ N \ n \ '` r\ 'c \ � l \ � \ APO✓ *GRocen -170E2. ninnt a C PS. N BUnJEO R27G/ f\ /Z R� je9 \ / \ '`\ h � 1 0)14 1 1 / .. \ \\ v \ m X1 \ 1 ■ p \\ \ c .. A Co \ ., \ /.. n\ Ivry A An Y \ t\:. ..... T/ ••'`..1.1./1.29,..„). A b O d_ ,./. s!v S ht Pa iirictr/ PotE..�'' -.-g g / - elk l' / NIHe ,L,44):• 4 cO R 1 0 , • RerN '~ , ; - / Nt a ;✓ °i AS - BUILT SURVEY � .c....,......-,..„,... 1 her 6 r if that I have ed the foil desc.ibed ..,:c- C f� 1 "H, Y - . y ncy & Pru Ci t 0 1 , Lot G —/ 11S .S ��y 92 / B /cf °1;.. ri '' /Inapt 64 = %r !�o lr; i>" i7 ,J .r ' r. DLSfPic t., ' C I - :H A ' .. .% Q � — / o I and that the improvements situated thereon arc within the property lines Q • r L ° ' e ' ° :�. a and do not overlap or encroach on the property lying adjac n thereto. ., . . ; 5 that no improve o c property lying adjacent thereto encroach on • A. v the and th v u ar there are no roadway n .. .. Goes or other 'isibl: a m Q ... iS •5777 . . 0 di. i =s men's on said property except as i Q 11 :" .(yo Cr a vd hewn. Q�� a n ° S ° 45 Dared t h \t ; i y e '• • et:,' oft c cCt 1F- •,- t 20 ,. _ 14 anowo Icred Land GEE Registered La Survc ot I Sole: /'r = 30 A. - -7' Drawn b : S. ,4o5ie: mryn 1 Date: /0 et/abet- 2002 Case No. 11 -014 Application - Page 7 of 14 Public Hearing Item 7-A _ P82 March 16, 2011 ' to' '' .1 zsii• ,. ..f „L, - •.:}. , - .- . _ i'l - :4, Ig . . 47.Le- _, . - ,2; "r i 1 11 . _ - '', 1 ' 1 45i . ,' .. ,' •,:% . * ‘ ' •"$.1 r / •.,... . .),",„bs -- — trib -,.., • u m : . SI ... 1 t - , Ill " t • il , tgif , i tere .. L . JEN ilj .. • 1 • . ` ' I 1 Ore 11 ~ lig hi! 1 ill i 1,thlis 1 !, s, , . III 4 _.4411i ). g hum . , _ . ,, .0. 0, • • . b., .„ 9 ,,•,,-.•.-! . ' - 77 ''' ' i ' CL3 11 jail i ..irMlY _ .. , - • ''-- ---i p v I 1 L ... ? --- — .' ..! ' ,, a■ i 'Irti - 41 - C. ---__.s.-- sr.,....-,;;,:...2:211;,.;—„,,,_,J;;;;,„If, ,- • . ;r; e ; i c i ,,, LI ;, a, - _„ '''' Y - ' ' ' irci5' .0,01 • mg. ,) — . . 1: f 1 ' 1 A t t 'P J- ' -- „e< - 2 ' . 4 - • L -; :::,. 1 r,:..g,: ZIttil% z iiit.;:* -- ---- . "..■;.: • '.;rs ....: --- - -- • ':' ,4a.. '4107r;*: .-'‘.`-'. 1.4 . hi • . 1" .” L r‘t.{1.‘' . i t?' - 1 Ii °, • .14S. 4 .. i .i: da.e.re ----.. ' ..,,, , ocratt 6.1 14?-::-;'/L.i'.'ilf: :. ... t - t ki ziNkle & Al : ` t t . ‘ 1 ' ':, ' ' ....Para- ,. 'il; ,,,.;-.11. 4'04,1. / , i ,...77-' ° . --'1444,„„ b,i -7 - 2 -1 V' re ,,r;;;;;;:t .,. "-:',„; 'C A r itd "1 . t I . NCI tela , ' yl , 1 r• -1C ia rc ... /H“ pir... t il " .' i m,„'" '14sit - .,--....-4 ------;:-7--..HRk.."..' 4 . „. I 4, 1 . -4 4-,-, r . ---:= .. ._..- ...: I i 11 A': .." i f 4 419 101r =-' :7 . , :14-rf sa%lokreg. rn _...4---- - - ,1, - : 4'.. .1 W IS "‘ Op 4 ''.4: 14 3/4V/ : 'A ' , 4f....ci 4rIrr= r il t i (t.r0 • rr 4 -..".4A - ft, kW 7 ' 4 $ 7 " 1/4 W 4 A '4411%;&‘L t .' , . ‘ 2.- \ 4. , -,ettf.)-gpk , --: li ,,.../N ,..,,4..., . . A, i i r a0 tt 4N - ?.. 44 k ht I ti e : 1 - 4 , , . .t- cl. .. •It't ir.; — + &• N. 5 1 1 “kvgv.,.., ;v:i„,.A. ,, , ,IL:liti.v i , ,, I , h i e — „ -- „kJ., .. ,,. i -k , 0, . 1 ,14, , ,, y, •• . 4 , .t C . 1 ', t.t`ti..- ., ..., 4 14 " "no ' .. ci, 'Pt - 'ir+.,, '' 0 MI '4,1 t i .. r- . , -., , ,,....,-, "'Jr gi a .- . de, tme-rit-14‘.- - 0 1- 01 k i `' 1 ' ,,,ft-:..li 4., • , .4 i 71 -.'"Y ati A nit,' i c IN 4it 7 f i---{: tt • ' • - , b e 41 L 1 /* V Li ‘-• - Case No 11-014 Application - Page 8 of 14 Public Hearing Item 7 -A P &Z March 16, 2011 I )) : k � i r_,-- 77 �' l -.. � d ys x x � - d w �,,.r - S,, h .k`t. — "'�. k t f S � �, - t i's : _., r tea • f y ,�. �(. q Z � . yT� . 1J i �° ` Amt s k; _7 o t ^` \ 'w " q £ xl mil I z 'l i�! f „1� 'f(t� ."'f+ t.� { y !4{t s s ;I f� . R ` 'R . '' . 7 v . a . !�, r4!t' } j Mt g 4 F 4' c d i S P V x .! " �^ ;: �'$ 11f r . ; if& P F ve. ,Tt .C �' G t Ai. ` i,�„ 'e1 '11110 " � i i !Y 4 1 y , �..i. t-��1 r § f ! g k J. � � 9} t � y � ti p, y,V� � j� � P e x 1 1�1( � � 4 f 1 , t , ^ ci` i s ., 7 € r‘ivzs x *..S J 4 'Ft4 1' �l�;F & 1 1 � r s j ' Y ,« 1 t � �" rr rF 1 Q , +w !, � x i 4: ; r ! a 1 ; . ` `` „ .. 1 ' 1 08' ` 2U,1 .: `• 012 ?7' •/D .. .... 1'n.< .. Yi. u. .,:4L;Y .. .4. .,� � b „1,�: ^� > .1: :. a! 1sM. s ..... i w fy � 7 . • _ Y f } % a k r ��nn Ih �'°" m"' r t _ as �� • g7 ! `dill v' if!' , 9, ,� 1a' , +► r_. `' � �7 717111 1 � � �� � j� lI1i � f :Z ,;:; ,1 ijlI 1 l 114n,i t 1,1 _,.„. .....,:,.t: 1 v I i ( t a ' , .� {{ tw �r ! � g � fr y l da f 4 � � { `) t ) r � `L3 ,C t� t ' 1 .b7 � p r l . tte f 'k1r y r 'i(' �+ ti`�` , 1 s t riti � fi�5 y t.,� a �y' a r y �k: , � + "I l ,A"` 0 , E, .' 1 Q8 0t'14� ' , . ,?t ..,„0 : -9a /tm d+ff 1 . g.\ .„ , ... X s'1. ..., ki�,..i'J;.C�n+�1 -.' !e,rfi..Jdq Case No. 11 -014 Application - Page 9 of 14 Public Hearing Item 7-A P&Z March 16, 2011 1 \ _ -- ., — Y 1 ti ' I I, -'' i f I) i 1 ',.\\ \ - 1:.:,. . :-.:-..... :..!.. , Up V ,1 Q; 0 e St I l l u` f 1 . e r t rl 1 , 0 8' k 8.: `.' ,� � r p Aja � � p , 7 i I d I 11 08'.,2Or1.0 8 7, 5'S Case No 11 -014 Application - Page 10 of 14 Public Hearing Item 7-A P&Z March 16, 2011 . . , ., ... , ‘.4•-•.'..i.-..-; • -24."41,:i .. _ " .......... ? - " ..;:it 'A . .....t. ..Rar ----:..?_ ---:;::' 4. .;..- = tr;j;jt: - --i - - - ..- ..; t'S:‘ . - :----.“;;; ...1-- ......tr.w..:.; - .. -- - p--<.!* r `.:-... - ... — -cc:, - ...,- • . " "ts--- - :-.---: - ,.,"*.-- .? t s ,- ..-... ,--: 17 .:,,, g ..7 _ , flJ i kailAPAP- - All /11 .., . -1, . . ,,,, 1 IN - %3/411,„, 4 , ' [ tt - - - 1 ---- _ a - -- Lk i 7 • , 7ffc, - ,.;4.7. . f.' • . • -. % -,,-- :: - . ..; ,.: T . --..- --r ;:,- titt:11 , ''..4171'' .., ..,--:1[4-lati43/4744;;',....- :-.. t■ 5 % -,:- • t '. . . ' :. r I :V(irC4r.itL °--4,-445:11:11.: 59 . r .. , - ::: . 7 '' : . ' " .74.1;......:Z.M 8201 8., ". .. $..... ro 0.7-4.--tnr * .f.,, ,,.. i.,.. ._ . .- --"'—'" - .., . a "Pen-1;••piir _tt 1 A r -",••••••,- 5 2:-. \-74.411-1:::rWasrritisc Le. 'N; 1 ... .. `k•- S 4,- ..sr w rilS• t •ti : .dr • • 1 7 i erh::■."?.....14,.,,,,...,:■iiiwik.t., 1 .4 A - ....V ... 2r, i .7r,: • --...-.. 2....- .17 ........ :..:,.-..-.,4",...--:-..,, Ar ,-, ...,- i. A „------------- - ‘,,.,,,a, ...., r ti t zr - -; :tinfiii -e iirccirt r .4 1 -r.4i,: t r•o• , `,..:Pilr27 , 43. , • - : " - tclet,'", .,_„_....,1:4:--,- - .:Aor:'-••••• I ." .fir;', tz 1.44ef."34.4. ...sir ti"'W•ii 1 0 2 - . i '4 - i ; ' ',;.? - . _ - -- ar o I ' -- iiiie- -"eife ef • .74; ! /' " - ^4 --, ::- " -"re"' . ' P• ' .,. '1 i e. - •: I i 7 ' e. 44 4 di._ • , ;: i:r......,,........ , 4 : 4 ..) •;", ., r#,... , '4', tic 1 F AF.,:‘,...-w: - b. ,, .-: 11; .,:: ,.. 4 , in ....t (- , ,.- ,:.:` . .., 0 ni.i..,vms4 :...rez i , ve - .-„4 4. - cziaili . ,,,,,..-.. ‘.. i - Case Na 11-014 Application - Page 11 of 14 Public Hearing Item 7 -A P8Z March 16, 2011 Chapter 17.90 B — BUSINESS DISTRICT Sections: 17.90.010 Description and intent. 17.90.020 Permitted uses. 17.90.030 Conditional uses. 17.90.040 Building height. 17.90.050 Performance standards. 17.90.060 Urban renewal plan compliance. 17.90.010 Description and intent. The B business zoning district is established for the purposes of protecting and encouraging the development of community business core areas that function efficiently as centers of retail business and retail service activities. For the business zoning district, in promoting the general purposes of this title, the specific intentions of this chapter are: A. To encourage the continued use and development of land for retail purposes; B. To discourage the use of business district lands for other than retail purposes; C. To prohibit the use of business district lands for manufacturing and industrial purposes; and D. To encourage the discontinuance of existing uses that are not permitted under the provisions of this chapter. [Ord. 82 -40 -0 §1, 1982. Formerly §17.21.010]. 17.90.020 Permitted uses. The following land uses and activities are permitted in the business district: A. Accessory buildings; B. Assembly halls; C. Art galleries; D. Automobile repair garages and dealerships; E. Banks;. F. Building material suppliers; G. Dry- cleaning establishments; H. Eating and drinking establishments; 1. Fraternal organizations and private clubs; J. Funeral parlors; K. Gasoline service stations; L. Govemment offices; M. Hotels; N. Laundry establishments; 0. Libraries; P. Machine shops; Q. Marinas and boat moorage; R. Mini - warehouses; S. Motels; T. Multiple - family dwellings; — 3 -E' a„, l -a'=!_ ._. - 1-, I 6, I n , U. Museums; c V. Offices; 211041/4i Case No. 11 -014 Application - Page 12 of 14 Public Hearing Item 7 -A P &Z March 16, 2011 §17.21.060]. This page of the Kodiak Island Borough Code is current through Code Publishing Company Ordinance FY2009 -13, passed December 18, 2008. Voice: (206) 527 -6831 Disclaimer: The Borough Clerk's Office has the official version of the Kodiak Fax: (206) 527 -8411 Island Borough Code. Users should contact the Borough Clerk's Office for Email: CPC@codepublishing.com ordinances passed subsequent to the ordinance cited above. Borough Website: http: / /www.kodlakak.us/ Telephone number: (907) 486 -9310 a41041 Case No. 11 -014 Application - Page 13 of 14 Public Hearing Item 7 -A P&Z March 16, 2011 C V * O O \ C * ;S1/47 O O C>e k .\\ Case No. 11 -014 Application - Page 14 of 14 Public Hearing Item 7 -A P&Z March 16, 2011 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska 99615 (907) 486-9363 February 9, 2011 Public Hearing Item 7 -A PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE A public hearing will be held on Wednesday, March 16, 2011. The meeting will begin at 6:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska, before the Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission, to hear comments if any, on the following request: CASE: 11 - 014 APPLICANT: Bruce & Lila Beehler APPLICANT: KIB Planning & Zoning Commission REQUEST: A Rezone, according to KIBC 17.205.030E & C (Manner of Initiation), to consider the rezone of Lots D -2, 1 -1 -1, H -2, G -2 and G -1, U.S. Survey 3218 from B- Business (Lot G -1), and RRl -Rural Residential One (Lots D -2, H -1, H -2 and G -2), Q R3- Multi family Residential. (This scope of this case was expanded from Lot G -1 by the commission at the January 19, 2011 meeting to include Lots D -2, H -1, H -2 and G -2.) LOCATION: 3241, 3265, 3283, 3303 and 3325 Mill Bay Road ZONING: B-Busincss (G -1) and RRI -Rural Residential One (D -2, H -1, hl -2 and G -2) This notice is being sent to you because our records indicate you are a property owner /interested party in the area of the request. If you do not wish to testify verbally, you may provide your comments in the space below, or in a letter to the Community Development Department. Written comments must be received by 5 pm, March 1, 2011 to be considered by the commission. If you would like to fax your comments to us, our fax number is: (907) 486 -9396. If you would like to testify via telephone, please call in your comments during the appropriate public hearing section of the meeting. The local call -in telephone number is 486 -3231. One week prior to the regular meeting, on Wednesday, March 9, 2011, a work session will be held at 6:30 p.m. in the Kodiak Island Borough Conference Room ( #121), to review the packet material for the case. Kodiak Island Borough Code provides you with specific appeal rights if you disagree with the Commission's decision on this request. If you have any questions about the request or your appeal rights, please feel free to call us at 486 -9363. Your Name: Mailing Address: Your property description: Comments: Case No. 11 -014 Public Comment - Page 1 of 8 Public Hearing Item 7 -A P &Z March 16, 2011 Current Location Request a Rezone, according to KIBC 17.205.030.B & C (Manner 3241, 3265, 3283, 3303, of Initiation), to consider the rezone of Lots D -2, H -1, H -2, G -2 and & 3325 Mill Bay Road G -1, U.S. Survey 3218 from B- Business (Lot G -1), and RR1 -Rural P & Z Case 11 -014 Residential One (Lots D -2, H -1, H -2 and G -2), to R3- Multi- family Bruce & Lila Beehler & Residential. (This scope of this case was expanded from Lot G -1 KIB Planning & Zoning by the commission at the January 19, 2011 meeting to include Lots Commission D -2, H -1, H -2 and G -2.) ® ' 0 • W ill, s illit II 111111ti ® NEVA WAY F W 0 tiP 1 .. .. • �P ® ®I yP n� as z] n l � ®SgP ,. �0 e LL ® P Z t �,a� Q N Et O PO a K ♦P . 9� Ei /2J <4'9 . 3ao5® 1 Q• � USS 1682 Id A 'S A TRACT B r • • S >e - APP ltb II 0 ill TRACT A -1 ktp-4 I Itt P N N 1r,O¢k. ® N In r $ kiN i , � y J 0 A 9 • F� CYD DO . .� y(® CO 0 b A . _ �fifrl Kodiak Island Borough GIS Legend N ,1∎7 , 0 a , ' /. Feet I I Subject Parcels N � J/ E .- .444 0 225 450 900 �' t r 1 , t Notification Area S This map was prepared from the Kodiak Island Borough's GIS System. It is provided for the purpose of showing the general location of a property within the Kodiak Island Borough. This map does not represent a survey. More information about the mapping data can be obtained by contacting the Kodiak Island Borough IT Department at (907) 486 -9333. Case No. 11 -014 Public Comment - Page 2 of 8 Public Hearing Item 7 -A P8Z March 16, 2011 TIMOTHY ARENA FRANK ARENA 111 MICHAEL ANDERSON, LLC 3103 MILL BAY RD 590 PLEASANT AVE PO BOX 2310 KODIAK, AK 99615 SANTA ROSA, CA 95403 KODIAK, AK 99615 BRUCE BEEHLER RALPH BORS MELVIN BORTON 3325 MILL BAY RD PO BOX 805 265 NEVA \VAY KODIAK, AK 99615 KODIAK, AK 99615 KODIAK, AK 99615 BRECHAN ENTERPRISES INC RICHARD CARSTENS JUAN J. DOMINGUEZ P.O. BOX 1275 P.O. BOX 2676 520 THORSHEIM ST KODIAK, AK 99615 KODIAK, AK 99615 KODIAK, AK 99615 ANDREW EATON JAMES EGGEMEYER DEBBRA EGGEMEYER PO BOX 8758 P 0 BOX 965 3689 E. REZANOF DR KODIAK, AK 99615 KODIAK, AK 99615 KODIAK, AK 99615 DUNCAN FIELDS TAMIE FOGLE JOSEPH FRANCISCO PO BOX 25 3251 KATMAI DR 3260 VIEWCREST LN KODIAK, AK 99615 KODIAK, AK 99615 KODIAK, AK 99615 HOPE COTTAGES INC. PATRICIA JACOBSON REVOCABLE TERRY KACALSKI 540 W INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TRUST PO BOX 2014 RD P 0 BOX 8707 KODIAK, AK 99615 ANCHORAGE, AK 99518-1110 KODIAK, AK 99615 LAWRENCE KEEGAN KODIAK AREA NATIVE ASSOC KODIAK ASSEMBLY OF GOD P.O. BOX 1956 3449 REZANOF DR E P.O. BOX 747 KODIAK, AK 99615 KODIAK, AK 99615 KODIAK, AK 99615 KODIAK ISL HSG AUTHORITY CHRIS KOSTELECKY LEISNOI VILLAGE 3137 MILL BAY RD PO BOX 2383 3248 MILL BAY RD KODIAK, AK 99615 KODIAK, AK 99615 KODIAK, AK 99615 BRETT LOUNSBURY MAUDEAN MAGNUSON CATHERINE MCCARTHY PO BOX 8947 3181 MILL BAY RD P 0 BOX 957 KODIAK, AK 99615 KODIAK, AK 99615 HOMER, AK 99603 MILL BAY ENTERPRISES, LLC JAMES MORTON RODNEY MURDOCK PO BOX 2183 PO BOX 44 3272 MILL BAY RD KODIAK, AK 99615 KODIAK, AK 99615 KODIAK, AK 99615 Il — OI L c Case No. 11 -014 Public Comment - Page 3 of 8 Public Hearing Item 7 -A P&Z March 16, 2011 RICK OLSON RONALD PAINTER FAMILY TRUST JAMES PEARSON 305 NEVA WAY 3901 WOODLAND DR 118 W. HILLCREST ST KODIAK, AK 99615 KODIAK, AK 99615 KODIAK, AK 99615 MICHAEL RASMUSSEN LIVING SEVERIN REED GARY ROBERTS TRUST 3241 NIILL BAY RD P.O. BOX 3208 PO BOX 2213 KODIAK, AK 99615 KODIAK, AK 99615 KODIAK, AK 99615 MICHAEL SHERMAN JUDITH WATERBURY DEAN WISE PO BOX 67 3373 MELNITSA LANE PO BOX 82 KODIAK, AK 99615 KODIAK, AK 99615 KODIAK, AK 99615 PO BOX 8985 KODIAK, AK 99615 Case No. 11 -014 Public Comment - Page 4 of 8 FROM: TO:9P4869396 03/01/2011 09 :26:46 #1005 P.001/002 Public Hearing Item 7 -A P&Z March 16, 2011 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska 99615 (907)486.9363 February 9, 201 I Public Hearing Item 7 -A PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE A public hearing will he held on Wednesday, tNlarch 16, 2011. The meeting will begin at 6:30 p.n1. in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Ray Road, Kodiak, Alaska, before the Kodiak Island ,Borough Planning and Zoning Commission, to hear comments if any, on the following request: CASE: 11 -014 APPLICANT: Bruce & Lila Bcchlcr APPLICANT: KI13 Planning & Zoning Commission REQUEST: A Rezone, according to KIBC 17.205.030,B & C (Manner of Initiation), to consider the rezone of Lots D H - 1, H -2, 0 -2 and 0.1, U.S. Survey 3218 than B - Business (Lot G - 1, glad RRI -Rural Residential Ouc (Lois 0 -2, H -I, H -2 and 0 -2), to R3- Multi-fan Residential, (This scope of this case was expanded from Lot C -1 by the commission al the January 19, 2011 meeting to include Lots 0 -2, 0-1, H - and C -2.) LOCATION: 3241, 3265, 3283, 3303 and 3325 Mill Bay Road ZONING; B-Busincss (0 -1) and RRI -Rural Residential One (D-2,11-1, H -2 and G-2) This notice is being sent to you because our records indicate you are a properly owner /interested party in the area of the request. If you do nut wish to testily verbally, you may provide your comments in the space below. or in a letter to the Community Development Department, Written comments must be received by 5 um, March 1. 2011 to be considered by the commission. If you would like to fax your comments to us, our fax number is: (907) 486.9396. If you would like lo testify via telephone, please call in your comments during the appropriate public hearing section of the meeting. The local call - in telephone number is 486 -3231. One week nrinr to the reoular nu t luau. on Wednesday. March 9. 2(11 I . a wnrk sessinn will he held a A.10 n m in • the Kodiak Island Borough Conference Rooni 0121), to review the packet material for the ease. Kodiak Island Borough Code provides you with specific appeal rights if you disagree with the Commission's decision on this request. If'you have any questions about the request or your appeal rights, please reel free to call us at 4/46-9363. /f 4 Your "ism: S e v• /ft" Moiling Address:__ 2 V, / r 5 . r et/ Your property description: y � / ) D 2 32 Y�i �r // 907 Xe Continents: . xN � � yP 4" Case No. 11 -014 Public Comment - Page 5 of 8 FROM: TO:9P4869396 03/01/2011 09.27:12 #1005 P.002/002 Public Hearing Item 7 -A P &Z March 16, 2011 Dear P &Z Commission I am opposed to the rezoning of lots D-2, 11-1, 1-1-2, G -2, to R3 multi - family. I am sympathetic with Mr. Beehler's situation and I have no opposition to rezoning just his Lot to R3 or R2. My concem for the rest of the lots mentioned is I do not want to have a developer come in and build a huge apartment complex next door. Better yet two complexes next door after they subdivide. It is my opinion that this sort of development would greatly reduce the resale value of my house. A house I have invested a lot of time and money in. I have lived in this house for 37 years. In that time, I have seen many changes in the neighborhood. My neighbor's house burned down and a storage facility was built in its place All the trees were cut down behind my house and R Trailer room was built where they once stood. 1 personally don't' think any of these things have helped the resale value of the houses left on my road and definitely not the view. The existing single - family homes located on the lots in question are the only things left that still snake this feel like a neighborhood. I do not think we all should have our lots rezoned because one lot needs to be changed. If I remember correctly Mr. and Mrs. Beehler's lot was once zoned RR 1 like the rest of lots being discussed. It should not be impossible to rezone it again back to something the Beehlers can work with. 1 would like to ask you to put your self in my family's shoes when you discuss this rezoning. Look out the window of you own home and visualize an apartment complex next door. lam sure there is another solution available to help Mr. and Mrs. Beehler while at the same time limiting the development of the neighborhood. Sincerely, Sev, Brandy, Logan, and Kalin Reed 3241 Mill Bay Road Lot D -2 Kodiak, AK 99615 (907) 486-0868 d . �Cf Case No. 11 -014 Public Comment - Page 6 of 8 Public Hearing Item 7 -A \ ` P&Z March 16, 2011 • !1 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH I CO UNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT U L JAN 21 RED 1 71014111 Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska 99615 2611 (907) 486 -9363 t Public Hearing Item 7 -E IUNIIY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTF' I BLIC HEARING NOTICE A public hearing will be held on Wednesday, January 19, 2011. The meeting will begin at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska, before the Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission, to hear comments if any, on the following request: CASE: 11 -014 APPLICANT: Bruce & Lila Beehler REQUEST: A Rezone, according to KIBC 17.205.030.0 (Manner of Initiation), to consider a rezone of Lot G -1, a Portion of U.S. Survey 3218 from B- Business to R3- Multifamily Residential. LOCATION: Lot G -1, Ptn. U.S. Survey 3218, 3325 Mill Bay Road ZONING: B- Business This notice is being sent to you because our records indicate you are a property owner /interested party in the area of the request. If you do not wish to testify verbally, you may provide your comments in the space below or in a letter to the Community Development Department. Comments must be received by 5 pm, January 4, 2011 to be considered by the commission. You may fax your comments to (907) 486 - 9396. To testify via telephone, please call in during the appropriate public hearing section of the meeting. The local call -in telephone number is 486 -3231. The Alaska toll free telephone number is 1- 800 -478 -5736. One week prior to the regular meeting, on Wednesday, January 12, 201 I a work session will be held at 7:30 p.m. in the Kodiak Island Borough Conference Room ( #121), to review the packet material for the case. Kodiak Island Borough Code provides you with specific appeal rights if you disagree with the Commission's decision on this request. If you have any questions about the request or your appeal rights, please feel free to call us at 486 -9363. Your Name: r 1..taryf QQ r1', !J4 {y� n Mailing Address: fo. 3d 2J ca Your property description: "f1t F - `{ 4- F Comments: 4- 5. D f r. p t �Yflue.t`� \\v 11` .rf C rtt12C A evtt*.v .1 g:;5 .,5; tbolPon irC� OJA.Ak r ddn„ QASAhV‘ctiNC 4-• Woo. t4,, Int 0. Palma "'tit 2 / rJ _ .. • 1 N .r '1 1 -i.. .7 .• 1 A I s Case No. 11 -014 Public Comment - Page 7 of 8 Public Hearing Item 7 -A P &Z March 16, 2011 • . S.* O ° O \ � Case No. 11 -014 Public Comment - Page 8 of 8 Public Hearing Item 7 -A P&Z March 16, 2011 REVISED MEMORANDUM Date: March 3, 2011 To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: Community Development Department Subject: Information for the March 16, 2011 Regular Meeting Case: 11 -014 Applicants: KIB Planning & Zoning Commission Bruce & Lila Beehler Request: A Rezone, according to KIBC 17.205.030.A (Manner of Initiation), to consider the rezone of Lots D -2, H -1, H -2, G -2 and G -1, U.S. Survey 3218 from B- Business (Lot G -1), and RR1 -Rural Residential One (Lots D -2, H -1, H -2 and G -2), to R3- Multi- family Residential. (This scope of this case was expanded from Lot G -1 by the commission at the January 19, 2011 meeting to include Lots D- 2, H -1, H -2 and G -2.) Location: 3241, 3265, 3283, 3303, and 3325 Mill Bay Rd. Zoning: B — Business Zoning District. Forty (40) public hearing notices related to this request were mailed on February 11, 2010. Date of site visit: Various 1. Zoning History: The 1968 Comprehensive Plan identified this area as Residential Unclassified. Ordinance 79 -26 -0, August 2, 1979, rezoned the property to B — Business Zoning District. 2. Lot Size: Lot D -2 21,725 square feet (0.50 acres) Lot H1 30,220 square feet (0.69 acres) Lot H2 14,533 square feet (0.33 acres) Lot G2 23,233 square feet (0.53 acres) Lot G1 23,167 square feet (0.53 acres) 3. Existing Land Use: Lot D -2 Single- family Residential Lot H1 Single- family Residential Lot H2 Single- family Residential Lot G2 Two (2) Single- family Dwellings Lot G1 Two (2) Single- family Dwellings Case No. 11 -014 Staff Report - Page 1 of 10 Public Hearing Item 7 -A P &Z March 16, 2011 4. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North: United States Survey 3218; Tract V, Tract W Use: Mobile Home Park Zoning: B — Business Zoning District South: United States Survey 3218; Tract E -1A, Tract E -161, Tract E -1B2 and Tract E -2A Use: Business Zoning: B — Business Zoning District East: United States Survey 3218 Tract W Use: Mobile Home Park Zoning: B — Business Zoning District West: United States Survey 3218 Lot D -1 Use: Mini- storage Zoning: B- Business Zoning District. 5. Comprehensive Plan: The 1968 Comprehensive Plan identified this area as Residential Unclassified. The 1968 Comprehensive Plan projected this area to be Medium Density Residential by the Year 2000. The Kodiak Island Borough 2008 Comprehensive Plan identifies the proposed future land use of the proposed rezone area as Rural Residential (Lots D -2, H -1, H -2 and G -2) and Commercial / Business (Lot G- 1). 6. Applicable Regulations: The following sections of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Borough Code and the Kodiak Island Borough Coastal Management Program are applicable to this request: Title 17 Zoning KIBC 17.10.020 Reference and use. In accordance with Alaska Statutes, zoning decisions shall be based upon the recommendations contained in the comprehensive plan. The applicable comprehensive plan is the 2008 Kodiak Island Borough Comprehensive Plan Update. KIBC 17.205.030 Manner of initiation. Changes in this title (request for a rezone) may be initiated in the following manner: A. By petition of one (1) or more owners of property within an area proposed to be rezoned. A petition shall be in the form of an application for a change in the boundary of a district, shall be filed in the community development department, be accompanied by the required fee and such data and information as may be necessary to assure Case No. 11 -014 Staff Report - Page 2 of 10 Public Hearing Item 7 -A P&Z March 16, 2011 the fullest practicable presentation of facts and shall set forth reasons and justification for proposing such change ( emphasis mine). KIBC 17.205.055 Submission to assembly. A. Within thirty days after the planning commission has acted favorably upon a proposed zoning change in accordance with the above provisions, a report with recommendations shall be submitted to the assembly together with the proposed ordinance. Such recommendations of the planning commission shall be advisory only and shall not be binding upon the assembly. When an ordinance has been forwarded to the borough assembly, the assembly shall act in accordance with this chapter and notice shall be issued as provided in Section 17.72.070, by the borough clerk. B. If the planning commission recommends denial of any proposed amendment; its action shall be final unless the initiating party, within ten days, files a written statement with the clerk requesting that the commission's action be taken up by the borough assembly. Coastal Management Applicable Policies 4.4 Enforceable Policies B. Coastal Development Policy 8 -1: Multiple Use a. Structures or dredged or fill material placed in coastal waters shall be designed to minimize the need for duplicative facilities. Consistency: Not Applicable. The rezone will not involve the placement of structures, dredge or fill material in coastal waters f b. This policy is established for the Coastal Development standard (11 AAC 112.200) subject use. It applies to all uses and activities related to siting of facilities in or adjacent to coastal waters and placement of dredged or fill material into coastal waters. Consistency: Not Applicable. The rezone location is not adjacent to or within coastal wale Policy 8 -3: Dredge and Fill Activities a. An applicant for a project that will place structures or discharge dredge or fill material into coastal waters must include in the project description measures that will limit the extent of direct disturbance to as small an area as possible. Consistency: Not Applicable. The rezone location is not adjacent to or within coastal waters! b. This policy is established for the Coastal Development standard (11 AAC 112.200) subject use. It applies to all uses and activities related to placement of structures in or adjacent to coastal waters and placement of dredged or fill material into coastal waters. Consistency: Not Applicable. The rezone location is not adjacent to or within coastal waters) C. Natural Hazards Policy C -1: Erosion and Landslides a. Proposed development and resource extraction activities in designated erosion hazard areas shall: 1. Minimize removal of existing vegetative cover, and Case No. 11 -014 Staff Report - Page 3 of 10 Public Hearing Item 7 -A P8Z March 16, 2011 2. Stabilize soils and re- vegetate with native species for areas where development necessitates removal of vegetation, unless re- vegetation activities would cause more damage. Consistency_ Not Applicable. The rezone location is not located in a designated erosion hazard area: b. Subsection a applies to areas designated as erosion hazards under 11 AAC 114.250(b) as described in Section 4.5.2. Consistency: Not Applicable. The rezone location is not located in a steep slope area or identified as within an erosion hazard areal D. Coastal Habitats and Resources Policy D -5: Wind Generation and Bird Habitat a. The applicant shall incorporate measures into the project description regarding the siting of wind generation projects to minimize mortality to birds. These measures shall include, but are not limited to, installation of turbines on the tallest towers practicable for the site, configuration of towers to reduce the likelihood of bird strikes, and use of tubular towers, fully enclosed nacelles or other appropriate technology that has been demonstrated to reduce bird mortality from wind turbines. Consistency; Not Applicable. The rezone does involve a wind generation project) b. This policy applies to uses and activities related to the Energy Facilities Standard 11 AAC 112.230. Consistency_ Not Applicable. The proposed rezone does not involve an energy facility; H. Recreation Policy H -1: Protection of Recreation Resources and Uses a. On public lands and waters used for recreation activities within designated recreation areas or on private lands and waters within designated recreation areas where the landowner has granted formal permission for recreational activities, non - recreational projects and activities shall be located, designed, constructed and operated to avoid significant adverse impacts to recreation resources and activities, including access and scenic views unless a comparable alternative recreational opportunity can be provided that would not decrease the quality of the recreation experience in another area. Consistency: Not Applicable, This rezone will not be located on public land) b. Access through water bodies shall be maintained. 1. Fences shall not be constructed across streams, 2. Bridges must be constructed at least four feet above the ordinary high water mark, 3. Structures, other than weirs, shall not impede travel by watercraft along waterways, and 4. Weirs shall be constructed to allow for small boat passage over or around the structures, and warning signs shall be placed at least 25 yards upstream of the weirs. Consistency: Not applicable. The rezone is not located along _a water body used for recreation purposes) c. This policy applies to areas designated for recreation under 11 AAC 114.250(c) as described in Section 4.5.1, and it applies to all uses and activities that could affect recreational values described in the resource inventory and analysis. Consistency: Not applicable. This area is not specifically identified or reserved for recreational use under 11 AAC 1 14.250(c) — I. Archaeological and Historic Resources Policy 1 -1: Consultation and Surveys a. For projects within the historic and prehistoric designation area, the applicant shall submit with the consistency review packet an assessment of potential impacts to historic and prehistoric resources and a Case No. 11 -014 Staff Report - Page 4 of 10 Public Hearing Item 7 -A P8Z March 16, 2011 plan for the protection of those resources. As part of the assessment, the applicant shall consult with the KIB, tribal entities and the Alutiiq Museum. Consistency: Not applicable. The rezone location is not known to be located in an area identified as historic or prehistoric resource area b. This policy is established for areas designated for the study, understanding and illustration of history and prehistory under 11 AAC 114.250() as described in Section 4.5.4. It applies to all uses and activities that could affect these resources. Consistency: Not applicable. The rezone is not located in an area identified as a historic orprehistoric_ resource areal Policy 1 -2: Resource Protection a. For projects within the historic and prehistoric designation area, if previously undiscovered artifacts or areas of historic, prehistoric or archaeological importance are encountered during development, an artifact curation agreement will be developed between the landowner, appropriate state of federal preservation authorities, and the curation facility if artifacts are discovered on the project site. Consistency: Not applicable. The rezone is not located within an undesignated historic or prehistoric areal b. This policy is established for areas designated for the study, understanding and illustration of history and prehistory under 11 AAC 114.2500) as described in Section 4.5.4. It applies to all uses and activities that could affect these resources. Consistency: Not applicable. The rezone is not located in an area identified for the study _ — understanding or illustration of history and prehistory under 11 AAC 114.250(1 K. Mineral Extraction and Processing Policy K -1: Siting of Material Sources a. Sources of sand and gravel shall be authorized in the following priority: 1. Upland sites, including river terraces above historic high water, 2. Areas of low habitat value, including river bars, 3. Streams which do not provide fish habitat, and 4. Other habitats. Consistency: Not Applicable. The project does not involve extraction of sand and gravel resources) b. This policy applies to the sand and gravel standard (11 PAC 112.260). Consistency: Not Applicable. The project does not involve extraction of sand and gravel resources! Case No. 11 -014 Staff Report - Page 5 of 10 Public Hearing Item 7 -A P &Z March 16, 2011 4.5 Designated Areas N/A 4.5.1 Recreation Areas N/A 4.5.2 Natural Hazard Areas N/A 4.5.3 Important Habitat Areas N/A 4.5.4 Historic and Prehistoric Resource Areas N/A 4.5.5 Commercial Fishing and Seafood Processing Facilities N/A 4.5.6 Subsistence Areas N/A CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Comprehensive Plan The Comprehensive Plan notes under "Implementation Policies" (Chapter 12, Page3): "Identify an adequate supply of land . . . to meet future needs for homes and businesses, including commercial and industrial uses. Additional study is needed to estimate future employment in specific industries and related needs for land zoned for those types of uses. For example, in assessing the need and most appropriate locations for new industrial [Business] land, consider the following factors: 1. The need to support potential economic growth sectors. The level of need should be based on an assessment of trends in population growth and in specific economic sectors, including a realistic assessment of their potential within the KIB. 2. Proximity to adequate public facilities, including roads, water and air transport facilities, as well as water and wastewater treatment facilities. 3. Potential conflicts with adjacent land uses, particularly residential uses and sensitive natural resources. 4. Parcel size, topography and other site characteristics as they relate to the requirements of businesses in anticipated growth industries ". Staff typically recommends that the commission give due deference to the recommended land uses provided in the comprehensive plan. In this case however, staff sees that there is a recommendation for rural residential land use in this general area which appears to be somewhat inconsistent with the overwhelmingly commercial zoning surrounding this residential enclave. The plan recommends "Rural Residential" use Lots D -2, H -1, H -2 and G -2 and Business /Commercial on Lot G -1. The seemingly inconsistent mixing of rural Case No. 11 -014 Staff Report - Page 6 of 10 Public Hearing Item 7 -A P&Z March 16, 2011 residential with commercial may point out one of the limitations of the comprehensive plan as a generalized policy document. The plan does not look at specific parcels (or even small enclaves of isolated zoning) unless specifically addressed at some point during the planning process. A note on the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map notes that the map is generally based on the 2005 zoning map unless otherwise noted. Rural Residential use along Mill Bay Road would appear to be a legacy zoning designation that harks back to a much earlier time in the development of the community. As the surrounding commercial area continues to develop over time, it would appear that the Rural Residential zoning will continue to become more out of character with the predominantly B- Business zoning context. As expressed in other zoned areas in the City of Kodiak, near downtown and elsewhere along Mill Bay Road it would appear that R3- Multi- family Residential zoning would be a better fit with surrounding B- Business zoning and uses, while allowing existing uses to continue until they are redeveloped. ZONING /USE: The general area is zoned a combination of B- Business and RR1 -Rural Residential One. The five subject parcels are zoned RR1 -Rural Residential One (Lots D -2, H -1, H- 2 and G -2) and B- Business (Lot G -1). The area is a mixture of residential and commercial uses, however the area does not seem to be conducive to higher end commercial uses perhaps due to the topography of the area and the limited area that is on grade with Mill Bay Road. Because the rezone area now comprises five (5) lots there is less of a concern about the prospect of spot zoning wherein one or more lots are provided a set of zoning standards that are substantially out of sync with the surrounding zoning and development. As mentioned in the original staff report for this case, if only one lot in this area were considered for R3- Multi- family Residential zoning a case for spot zoning could easily be made that the granting of said zoning was an arbitrary and capricious exercise of zoning authority to meet the desires of a single lot owner. For that reason, staff recommended and the commission agreed to expand the scope of this rezone investigation. The RR1 -Rural Residential One zoning district is a large lot, low density single - family residential zoning district that is typically intended for suburban and rural areas where municipal water and sewer may not be available. In locations where municipal water and sewer does become available, the zone has a flex provision that allows minimum lot areas down to 20,000 square feet and similarly scaled back lot width and side yard setback requirements. At least two of the lots in the rezone investigation area are currently exceeding the single - family residential density requirements which would be made conforming in the R3- Multi - famkly Residential zoning district. Staff notes that although much of the land around this rezone area is zoned B- Business, a considerable area along the rear of the lots is currently developed for Mobile Home Park (a residential use) which is a conditional use in the B- Business zone. Case No 11 -014 Staff Report - Page 7 of 10 Public Hearing Item 7 -A P&Z March 16, 2011 LAND SUITABILITY: The parcels subject to this rezone investigation are topographically constrained in the rear yard area so that only the fronts of these lots are generally on grade with Mill Bay Road. Although structures can be demolished or relocated over time to support commercial use, the existing layout of structures on the site may be a constraint on conversion to a commercial use or even to multi - family residential use due to the limitations imposed on parking availability and maneuvering area. The area is well served by roads and utilities, each lot having direct access to an arterial class street and all lots being served by water, sewer and all manner of electrical and communication utilities. As a result, the lots are well situated to support a higher density of residential or commercial development whether that density is realized by re- subdivision of land or by the development of higher density residential structures on the existing lots. The subject parcels are located fairly close to shopping areas, schools, and another arterial street (Rezanof Drive). RECENT DEVELOPMENT TRENDS IN THE AREA: This area has been zoned a combination of RR1 -Rural Residential One and B- Business for many years. The RR1 zoned lots are all developed with single - family Residential except for Lot G -2 which has a two- family residence. The one B- Business lot is likewise developed with two - family residential according to borough assessing records. The surrounding area is a mixed use commercial area with several office and retail conversions, mini - storage and outdoor storage uses. In addition, as previously alluded to in this report a substantial area surrounding these lots though zoned B- Business is in reality devoted to Mobile Home Park use. TRAFFIC IMPACTS: Uses in the R3- Multi- family Residential zoning district have parking and traffic generation characteristics very similar to uses in the B- Business zone. Staff would not anticipate any major increase in traffic potential from this site as a result of the change of zoning. The proposed change of zoning from RR1 -Rural Residential One is likely to increase the number of average daily trips in the area over time if the area develops as multi - family residential or professional offices over time. This additional traffic can be easily accommodated by the arterial class street which has pedestrian sidewalk/path improvements on both sides, curbs and gutters and an integrated 2 -way left turn lane in the center of the road. COMMENTS Typically R3- Multifamily Residential and B- Business zoned lands are located in close proximity to one another. The B- Business zone permits multi - family residential uses and the R3- Multi- family zone permits a number of commercial /institutional uses. The rezone area contains a number of existing residential uses and structures as well as being in close proximity to a large mobile home park. Case No 11 -014 Staff Report - Page 8 of 10 Public Hearing Item 7 -A P8Z March 16, 2011 The idea of R3- Multi- family Residential may not be universally accepted in this area by all affected property owners who may want to maintain the status quo. From looking at the zoning map and the comprehensive plan map however it is clear that this area has been bypassed during prior zone changes all around it so that the RR1 zoning now appears to be out of place for urban land within the City of Kodiak corporate limits that is well served for access, utilities and close proximity to schools and commercial services. As staff indicated last month, it is difficult to envision the rezoning a single lot to R3 because it would likely be considered a spot zoning. It is equally difficult to envision a decision to rezone some of the lots and not others. These lots share many similar attributes given the nature of the existing residential development and it would be best if all the lots were treated equally in a single zone. Staff believes that best fit would be the R3 zone, but it could also be the B- Business zone or even R1 or R2 zoning would be an improvement over the RR1 zone in this context. As staff has noted, the plan identifies Rural Residential Use for four out of the five lots in the rezone area. To a certain degree this may be explained by a note on the map as follows: "Modified from the Kodiak Urban Area Zoning Map, prepared by the Kodiak Island Borough Community Development Department, 2005." What this means is that unless specific areas were identified for different designations through the planning process, the existing zoning pattern was generally carried over to the future land use map without change. In this case, it appears to be perpetuating a legacy zoning for this area that may be out of place in the largely commercial context within which the lots are now located. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Commission recommend the rezone of Lots D -2, H -1, H -2, and G -2, U.S. Survey 3218, from RR1 -Rural Residential One to R3- Multifamily Residential, and the rezone of Lot G -1, U.S. Survey 3218, from B- Business to R3- Multi- family Residential and to forward that recommendation to the borough assembly for approval. APPROPRIATE MOTION Should the Commission agree with the staff recommendation, the appropriate motion is: Move to recommend the rezone of Lots D -2, 1-1-1, H -2 and G -2, U.S. Survey 3218, from RR1 -Rural Residential One to R3- Multi- family Residential, and the rezone of Lot G -1, U.S. Survey 3218, from B- Business to R3- Multi- family Residential, and forward this case to the borough assembly with a recommendation for approval, and; To adopt the findings contained in the staff memorandum dated March 3, 2011, as "findings of fact" for this case. Staff recommends that this motion be approved by the commission. Case No. 11 -014 Staff Report - Page 9 of 10 Public Hearing Item 7 -A P &Z March 16, 2011 FINDINGS OF FACT Section 17.72.020 states that the Commission shall incorporate the following criteria into their report to the Assembly: 17.72.020 A. Findings as to the Need and Justification for a Change or Amendment. The four of five lots in the rezone area is currently zoned RR1 -Rural Residential One which is a large lot low density single - family residential zoning district. This zoning appears to be out of place in the context of being totally surrounded by B- Business zoned land. In addition, the lots are located in the urban area along a developed arterial street with excellent access to utilities, schools and services in the area. The fifth lot is zoned B- Business but developed as residential that is similar to the other lots in the aforementioned RR1 zoning district. The petitioners of this lot have requested the rezone initially, but good zoning practice would discourage the treatment of this one lot to a different set of development standards than any of the surrounding lots currently enjoy. Changing the zoning of these five lots to R3 would not have a major impact on the availability of either the RR1 -Rural Residential On or B- Business zoned land. Generally, multi - family residential is considered a good fit with commercially zoned land as it is an allowed use in some form in all urban commercial zones where municipal water and sewer are available. There may be some concerns about the mixed use nature of the area surrounding the rezone area (B- Business zoned land). On the whole, however, the rezone has more positive attributes than negative, hence the recommendation to make the zoning change from RR1 -Rural Residential One and B- Business to R3- Multi- family Residential. 17.72.020 B. Findings as to the Effect a Change or Amendment would have on the Objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The 2008 Kodiak Island Borough Comprehensive Plan Update recommends this area for Rural Residential for four of the five affected lots. The fifth lot is recommended to remain Commercial /Business. While it is appropriate to give the plan due deference in these matters, it is clear from review that these designations are not fully consistent with the kinds of land uses currently developed in the area and that the plan designation is largely derived from the prior zoning map and the fact that no one was specifically concerned with the zoning of this area at the time the plan was being compiled. Investigation of the rezone indicates a substantially disconnect between the prevailing commercial zoning and development context of the rezone area which can only be remedied by a deviation from the express designations of the comprehensive plan. This, therefore, may be an exceptional situation whereby the due deference accorded the plan must yield to the more practical and realistic considerations pertaining to the rezone area and how this area can be of benefit to the overall community in the light of future development and use potential represented by these five lots. Case No 11 -014 Staff Report - Page 10 of 10 Kodiak Island Borough. Alaska PROPERTY APPRAISAL INFORMATION 2011 Entities Values PROPERTY 16334 R OWNER ID MCCARTHY CATHERINE 1 100% IMPROVEMENTS 96.800 Legal Description 12613 P 0 BOX 957 100 100% LAND MARKET + 71,600 USS 3218 LT H -1 MILL BAY RD HOMER, AK 99603 US CITY 100% OWNERSHIP OVER 100% MARKET VALUE = 168,400 100.00% PRODUCTIVITY LOSS - 0 APPRAISED VALUE = 168,400 R1452080010 ACRES: .6900 11111111111 1111 111 IIIII 11 1111 HS CAP LOSS - 0 SITUS 3265 MILL BAY RD KODIAK, AK 99615 APPR VAL METHOD: Cost ASSESSED VALUE = 168,400 GENERAL SKETCH for Improvement #1 (RESIDENTIAL) EXEMPTIONS UTILITIES LAST APPR. TOPOGRAPHY LAST APPR. YR 2007 ROAD ACCESS LAST INSP. DATE 24 ZONING RR1 NEXT INSP. DATE NEXT REASON PICTURE ✓ 1 • j REMARKS The property is in overall average to good condition ' rt Y]�,! • for the neighborhood. . , RAS -1 : ; - a� � c . N 912 ` - T W 1\ y ✓r o BUILDING PERMITS ISIUE DT PERMIT TYPE PERMIT AREA ST PERMIT VAL ' '`"� 0$(01!1982 RADN 0 A 2,936 � zN M : ,. l .) ii, 1} 1; 0 StE DT PRICE GRANTOR DEED INFO � ".I I�I,,'L.p,,,,M ��r -;',. wi "t ID ID D : 1 x 56180: USS 3218 100.00% NBHD:MLBY 100.00% IMPROVEMENT INFORMATION IMPROVEMENT FEATURES 18ervPE J) FSCRIPTION WHO CLASS /SUBCL AREA ONG PRICE UNITS BUILT FFF YR COND. VALUE DEPR PHVS ECON FUNC COMP ADJ ADJ UE V AL Exterior Wall 03 CDBAS BASE AREA R 05/ 912.0 140.001 1977 1980 AVE 127,700 70% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0.70 89.400 Interior Finish 02 - WDAVGNood Deck R 05/ 300.0 11.25 1 0 1990 AVE 3,400 81% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0.81 2.700 Roof Style 01 OWDST Woodstove R 05/ 1.0 3,000.00 1 0 1990 AVE 3,000 81% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0.81 2,400 Flooring 05 PRCHCVRDPORCH -AV R 05/ 64.0 45.001 0 1990 AVE 2900 81% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0.81 2.300 Number of Baths 100 1. RES STCD: Al 1,277.0 Homesite: N 137,000 96,800 Heating /Cooling 02 Fireplace WSF1 Appliance SFFG Number of Bedrooms 03 0 V to Pe = N er 0 n d I n N S g SUBD: USS 3218 100.00% NBHD:MLBY 100.00% LAND INFORMATION IRR Wets: 0 Capacity: 0 IRR Acres: 0 O'l Wells: 0 m� N N 1. RR1 DESCRIPTION TABLE Al I ET MH D ON IMENSIS I INR PRICE GROSS VAI NF 1 . 00 MASS ADI VAL SRC MKT VAL AG APPI Y AG CI ASS AG TABI F (1G I INR PRC g�y��q 3 1. SFR RR1 MBRDRES Al N SO 30,220.0000 SO 2.37 71,600 1.00 1.00 A 71,600 NO 0.00 IS SFR 71,600 0 D Page 1 of 1 Effective Date of Appraisal: January 1 Date Printed: 01/26/2011 11:54:20AM by ASCLR2 True Automation. Inc. Kodiak Island Borough, Alaska PROPERTY APPRAISAL INFORMATION 2011 Entitles Values PROPERTY 16335 R OWNER ID WISE DEAN KATHY 1 100% IMPROVEMENTS 153300 Legal Description 19145 PO BOX 82 100 100% LAND MARKET + 44,900 USS 3218 LT H -2 MILL BAY RD KODIAK, AK 99615 US CITY 100% OWNERSHIP OVER 100% MARKET VALUE = 198,200 100.00% PRODUCTIVITY LOSS - 0 R1452080020 ACRES: .3300 APPRAISED VALUE = 198,200 IIII !II111111IIII1IIIIIIIIII1IIII HS CAP LOSS - 0 SITUS 3283 MILL BAY RD KODIAK, AK 99615 APPR VAL METHOD: Cost _ ASSESSED VALUE = 198.200 GENERAL SKETCH for Improvement 41 (RESIDENTIAL) EXEMPTIONS UTILITIES LAST APPR. TOPOGRAPHY LAST APPR. YR 2007 ROAD ACCESS LAST INSP. DATE ZONING RR1 NEXT INSP. DATE la NEXT REASON it 8A52 6 4 PICTURE 25 i Y REMARKS The property is in overall average condition for the r 22 ' , V: i' r' neighborhood. JE 4 22: i": f + } `"` ` «+ Id ' n .. c 1 0 �.. -,�,, 'tom - ,_i '� , N J ,, F.. m BUILDING PERMITS m DAS .r r t. .,.. • UE DT PERMIT TYPE PERMIT AREA ST PERMIT VAL 10tl6 +7 0 e ! ii I 006/1983 RADN 0 A 9,599 S � -j I � 1 k 01401/1971 RREM 0 A 0 _2 o i f11 ii fiff - "Fh '31ft 1 -r te , fl ' ,i, °' SE LE DT PRICE GRANTOR DEED INFO ° 017/2007 YAKISH WO / 2007 / 557 It 0. R SUBD: USS 3218 100.00% NBHD:MLBY 100.00% IMPROVEMENT INFORMATION IMPROVEMENT FEATURES IRmTV DESCRIPTION MTHD CLASS /SUBCL AREA UNIT PRICEUNITS BUILT EFF YR COND, VAI UE DEPR PHYS ECON FIINC COMP ADJ ADJ VALUE Exterior Wall 03 arBAS BASE AREA R 5/ 1,086.0 132.90 1 968 1983 AVE 144,300 74% 100% 100% 100 °A 100% 0 74 106.800 Interior Finish 01 r,CPRCHS01id Wall P R 5/ 40.0 45.00 1 1985 AVE 1,800 76% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0.76 1,400 Roof Style 01 oWOAVGNood Deck R 5/ 804.0 11.00 1 1990 AVE 8,800 81% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0.81 7,200 Flooring 05 "VVOST Woodstove R 5/ 1.0 3,000.001 1985 AVE 3,000 76% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0.76 2.300 Baths 100 B Number umb of at al o ENCL Enclsd Shop/ R 5/ .0 0.001 1985 AVE 5,000 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1.00 5,000 N N of B 02 WBA Wood Balcony R 5/ 128.0 35.001 1985 AVE 4,500 76% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0.76 3,400 9 9 BANYA BANYA R 5/ .0 0.001 1985 AVE 2,000 76% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0.76 2,000 Fireplace WSF1 BAS2 BASE AREA 2N R V 256.0 132.901 1985 34,000 74% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0.74 25,200 Appliance SFFG 1. RES STCD: Al 2,315.0 Homesite: N 203,400 153,300 Number of Bedrooms 03 _0 v 3- 3 " m I n at S d SUBD: USS 3218 100.00% NBHD:MLBY 100.00% LAND INFORMATION IRR Wells: 0 Capacity: 0 IRR Acres: 0 Oil Wells: 0 m En iFi P Y: J LLE DESCRIPTION CLS TABLE 2Q HS METH DIMENSIONS 1INIT PRICE GROSS VALUE AQr! MASS ADJ VAL SRC MKT VAL AG APPI Y AG CI ASS AG TA fila AG UNIT PRO Ali VALUf3 m 3 1. SFR RR1 MBRDRES Al N SC/ 14.533 0000 S0 3.09 44,900 1.00 1.00 A 44,900 NO 0.00 SFR 44,900 0 D Page 1 of 1 Effective Date of Appraisal: January 1 Date Printed: 01/26/2011 11:54:25AM by ASCLR2 True Automation, Inc. Kodiak Island Borough, Alaska _ PROPERTY APPRAISAL INFORMATION 2011 Entities Values PROPERTY 16332 R OWNER ID BEEHLER BRUCE LILA 1 100% IMPROVEMENTS 234,100 Legal Description 3549 3325 MILL BAY RD 100 100% LAND MARKET + 60,900 USS 3218 PIN LT 0 -1 MILL BAY KODIAK, AK 99615 US CRY 100% OWNERSHIP OVER 100% MARKET VALUE = 295,000 100.00% PRODUCTIVITY LOSS - 0 APPRAISED VALUE = 295,000 R1452070010 • ACRES: .5300 NMI III Ili! 1111111]1111Ill HS CAP LOSS - 0 SITUS 3325 MILL BAY RD KODIAK, AK 99615 APPR VAL METHOD: Cost ASSESSED VALUE = 295,000 GENERAL SKETCH for Improvement #1 (RESIDENTIAL) EXEMPTIONS UTILITIES LAST APPR. TOPOGRAPHY LAST APPR. YR 2007 ROAD ACCESS LAST INSP. DATE as s. ZONING BUS NEXT INSP. DATE NEXT REASON waA a PICTURE Al 9AS 102 9 - nl 2192 REMARKS The two story house is in average condition for the 1 • neighborhood, the single story residence is in 2 - • average to fair condition for the neighborhood.. 12 E ." • " - 1.2 y , Y 51 y m BUILDING PERMITS 'P`- 44 I$:UE DT PERMIT TYPE PERMIT AREA ST PERMIT VAL n - ^' n . • w BIO-A 1 � 192 SBLE DT PRICE GRANTOR DEED INFO I 4 . , t I L I : , a HATFIHATFIELD WD / 2003 / 2249 12 22 I a`� I a - - - y ': LL- "'i`e�- i - tc a = .12 S. JBD: USS 3218 100.00% NBHD:MLBY 100,00% IMPROVEMENT INFORMATION IMPROVEMENT FEATURES IAN TYPE DESCRIPTION MTHD CLASS /SUBCL AREA UNIT PRICEUNITS BUILT EFF YR COND. VALUE DEPR PHYS ECON FLING COMP ADJ ADJ VALUE Exterior Wall 03 o BAS BASE AREA R 05/ 2,192.0 114.041 1987 1987 AVE 250,000 78°% 100% 80% 90% 80% 0.45 112,300 Interior Finish 01 wBIG -A B/I GARAGE R 05/ 2.192.0 44.79 1 1987 1987 AVE 98.200 78% 100% 80% 90% 80% 0.45 44,100 Roof Style 01 oWBA ORIG CODE: W R 051 500.0 27.501 0 1987 AVE 13800 78% 100% 80% 90% 80% 0.45 6.200 Flooring 04 125;RES STCO: Al 4,884.0 Homesite: N 362,000 162,600 Number of Baths 200 LARGER HOME DETACHED DUPLEX WHICH IS MODIFIED MBH. MEETS ZONING IF LOWER LEVEL OF MAIN HOME 15 USED AS COMMERCIAL PER ORIG BLDG PERMIT. Heating /Cooling 02 LOWER LEVEL PARTIALLY FINISHED WITHOUT PERMIT. ECONOMIC 15 ADJUST FOR LACK OF FINANCIABILITY DUE TO ZONING COMPLIANCE. _ Appliance SFAG Number of Bedrooms 04 _0 - 0 - 1:1 ps c N Q g 5. d 2 n N SUBD: USS 3218 100.00% NBHD:MLBY 100.00% LAND INFORMATION IRR Wells: 0 Capacity. 0 IRR Acres: 0 Oil Wells: 0 - 1 O DESCRIPTION C TABLE ac tj M ET H DIMENSIONS I INIT PRICE GROSS VAI IiE Lao MASS ADJ VAL SRC MKT VAL AG APPLY AG CIASS AG TABI C AG UNIT PRC AG VALI1' o 1. SMA BUS MBRDRES Al N SO 23,167.0000 S0 2.63 60,900 1.00 1.00 A 60,900 NO 0.00 12 3 9999 60,900 0 D Page 1 of 2 Effective Date of Appraisal: January 1 Date Printed: 01/26/2011 11:54:36AM by ASCLR2 True Automation, Inc. • Kodiak Island Borough, Alaska _ _ PROPERTY APPRAJSAL INFORMATION 2011 Entities Values PROPERTY 16333 R OWNER ID MORTON JAMES 1 100% IMPROVEMENTS 177,000 Legal Description 13177 PO BOX 44 100 100% LAND MARKET + 61,100 USS 3218 PTN LT G -2 MILL BAY RD KODIAK, AK 99615 US CITY 100% OWNERSHIP OVER 100% MARKET VALUE = 238,100 100.00% PRODUCTIVITY LOSS - 0 ACRES: .5300 R1452070020 APPRAISED VALUE = 238,100 111111141M 1111111111 111111 11 HS CAP LOSS - 0 SITUS 3303 MILL BAY RD KODIAK, AK 99615 APPR VAL METHOD: Cost ASSESSED VALUE = 238,100 GENERAL SKETCH for Improvement #1 (RESIDENTIAL) EXEMPTIONS UTILITIES LAST APPR. TOPOGRAPHY LAST APPR. YR 2007 ROAD ACCESS LAST INSP. DATE is ZONING RR1 NEXT INSP. DATE DETC•A NEXT REASON 6 00 u PICTURE tc REMARKS The property is in overall average to good condition ' ? =' P P Y 9 9 SS w *r for the neighborhood. 2 r - ! r� , CRPT 1255 C. OJl k ) r. ■ (� • m BUILDING PERMITS Ao I5i3UE DT PERMIT TYPE PERMIT AREA ST PERMIT VAL 077710/1990 RRPR 0 A 3,450 1 IF ,I 040 - . • 14/1976 RADN 0 A 10,000 Js t 1 ���y £ . • O BAS t i r ' ➢ ' � JI yy S$LE DT PRICE GRANTOR DEED INFO 1255 } ` '_ 1 . t : D o KAMAI JR. WD 1 2004 / 873 u is °m - ti D _.c,{ SUED: USS 3218 100.00% NBHD:MLBY 100.00% IMPROVEMENT INFORMATION IMPROVEMENT FEATURES J��TYPE DESCRIPTION MTHD CLASS /SUBCL AREA UNIT PRICEUNITS BUILT EFF YR COND. VALI IE DEPR PHYS ECON FUNC COMP am ADJ VALUE Exterior Wall 2 03 re BAS BASE AREA R 05/ 1,255.0 112.451 1963 1979 AVE 141,100 69% 100% 80% 100% 100% 0.55 77,900 Interior Finish 2 01 .CRPT CARPORT R 05/ 437.0 27.421 1963 1990 AVE 2,500 81% 100% 80% 100% 100% 0.65 2,500 Roof Style 2 01 oWDST Woodstove R 05/ 1.0 3,000.00 0 1990 AVE 3,000 81% 100% 80% 100% 100% 0.65 1.900 Flooring 2 04 — DETG- Detached She R 05/ 600.0 50.00 1 1965 1980 AVE 30,000 70% 100% 80% 100% 100% 0.56 16.800 Number of Baths 2 250 O1 8AS2 BASE AREA 2N R / 1,255.0 112.451 0 1985 141.100 69% 100% 80% 100% 100% 0.55 77 900 HealinglCooling 2 02 1, RES STCD: Al 3,548.0 Homesite: N 317,700 177,000 Fireplace 2 WSA7 Appliance 2 DPAG Number of Bedrooms 2 06 0 vv pa c Nrr o at = n N s m n — , SUED: USS 3218 100.00% NBHD:MLBY 100.00% LAND INFORMATION IRR Wells: 0 Capacity: 0 IRR Acres: 0 Oil Wells: 0 - o "o L# DESCRIPTION Q TABLE Q Ea METH DIMENSIONS UNIT PRICE GROSS VALUE ADJ MASS ADJ VAL SRC MKT VAL AG APPLY AG CLASS AG TABLE AG UNIT PRC AG VALLN m' 1. SMA RR1 MBRDRES Al N SO 23,233.0000 SG 2.63 61.100 1.00 1.00 A 61,100 NO 0.00 § ; S/M -4 61,100 0 D Page 1 of 1 Effective Date of Appraisal: January 1 Date Printed: 0126/2011 11:54:51AM by ASCLR2 True Automation, Inc. Kodiak Island Borough, Alaska PROPERTY APPRAISAL INFORMATION 2011 Entitles Values PROPERTY 16325 R OWNER ID REED SEVERIN 1 100% IMPROVEMENTS 155,100 Legal Description 15439 3241 MILL BAY RD 100 100% LAND MARKET + 58,400 USS 3218 TR D -2 MILL BAY RD KODIAK. AK 99615 US CRY 100% OWNERSHIP OVER 100% MARKET VALUE = 213,500 100.00% PRODUCTIVITY LOSS - 0 APPRAISED VALUE = 213,500 R1452040020 ACRES: .5000 I MINI! IIIIIn111111I11IIII HS CAP LOSS - 0 SITUS 3241 MILL BAY RD KODIAK, AK 99615 APPR VAL METHOD: Cost ASSESSED VALUE = 213.500 GENERAL SKETCH for Improvement #1 (RESIDENTIAL) EXEMPTIONS UTILITIES LAST APPR. TOPOGRAPHY LAST APPR. YR 2007 ROAD ACCESS LAST INSP. DATE 02/12/2002 ZONING RR1 NEXT INSP. DATE ss NEXT REASON CARPT SB n PICTURE u 288 12. f i )3 1 .2" Y :.//: at'c • REMARKS UPDATE -. ., �c "'ft. l av�,,,t - 26 a 15 U RAS 4Y- i L 1K'Ly p 1155 12 - - r q �- * ,. • DI DETO 15 075 11 1 1 I' I i taI4; . m BUILDING PERMITS 86 in � I6UE DT PERMIT TYPE PERMIT AREA ST PERMIT VAL 06105/2007 RRPR 0 A 5,398 I w" waA 0 sb L { , . . 4 A \� , i •.; 260 to :41-47-L.' ' I "'L`� SaE DT PRICE GRANTOR GEED INFO ' ;- : 4 112 2.1 111 x r , 1 y � S USS 3218 100.00% NBHD:MLBY 100.00% IMPROVEMENT INFORMATION IMPROVEMENT FEATURES IitaYPE DESCRIPTION MTHD CLASS /SI IBCL AREA UNIT PRICE UNITS pi IILT FE FYR COND, VALUE DEPR PHYS ECON FUNC COMP ADJ ADJVALUE Exterior Wail 03 'BAS BASE AREA R 04/ 1.155.0 128.63 965 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1.00 Interior Finish 01 uKWP KNEE WALL PO R 04/ 56.0 0.00 965 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1.00 Roof Style 01 oWBA ORIG CODE: W R 04/ 552.0 0.00 965 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1.00 Flooring 04 - BSM BASEMENT R 04/ 975.0 0.00 965 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1.00 °D Number of Baths 200 Heating/Cooling ETG DETACHED GAR R 04/ 864.0 0.00 965 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1.00 CARPT CARPORT R 04/ 288.0 0.00 965 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1.00 f at 02 WBA Wood Balcony R 04/ .0 0.00 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1.00 Fireplace WSA1 WDST Woodstove R 04/ .0 0.00 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1.00 Appliance SFAG WDSTRWood Stairs R 04/ .0 0.00 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1.00 Number of Bedrooms 03 0 SWP Solid Wall P R 04/ .0 0.00 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1.00 1. RES STCD: Al 3,890.0 Homesite: N 155,100 (Flat Values) 0 017 po C N Cr E 3 n 2 m s � SUED: U55 3218 100.00% NBHD:MLBY 100.00% LAND INFORMATION IRR Wells: 0 Capacity. 0 IRR Acres: 0 Oil Wells: 0 - `° Lk CR DES I N I PTO CLS TA Fj5 M ETH DIMENSIONS UNIT PRICE GROSS VALUE AD MASS ADJ VAL SRC MKT VAL AG APPLY AG CLASS AG TABLE AG I./NIT PRC AG VA m LL 1. SFR RR1 MBRDRES Al N S0 21,725 0000 S0 2.69 58,400 1.00 1.00 A 58,400 NO 0.00 2 3 SFR 58,400 0 D Page 1 of 1 Effective Date of Appraisal: January 1 Date Printed: 01/26/2011 11.55:O6AM by ASCLR2 True Automation. Inc Continued on hear map on /ewer left. /// / / / /// // / / /// / / //// / iii / r / �/ / / / /// , d its MpNASNKA // //// /j �� / ��� % �� i% � %j%%% /jji - /7. q"Orb - tam � O/alta . <Na * Communications 4���e ° 000CCa o � .- . `y �_ iP C. � rr d p 6 f �6rp!� ., � i h c y , �m y •�' ,�0 y'iA r oe "'.4 L d �R + m' ; fltruex Ql�e .w0� .*:4)7 � a v w �t..'4:q q7",a ` ""t f ',� <� �' x ° -'a a 0 h ® 'T BAY i/ i . �- �, . r nr,� d "�� 4�� ' MILL • 4 w®.+r -1 _ n " . a te \ I — p ^ ti. 3 ... �a� /•' t`- df '.o qV ' I vM1 R MONASHKA ,aev r_ 6 Q`�ri V �Y c ^"� �7 '` . . 'be b � iW.? F ♦ qC 4 � O „, BAY 9 la” o ne 5 -0��/r�`_ � C ddRb"1�,. `- o f �.� 9. t., o-r A 1 rk itz. Kodiak Island Borough - Kodiak Urban Area: Proposed Future Land Use D Commercial /Business Q Public Facilities /Ownership Conservation Q Rural Residential Q Future Special Planning Area - _ Urban Residential N _ Q Industrial /Light Industrial v A watershed 0 Open Space /Recreation Kodialdsland Mod iedfrom he Kodiak rban eaZoning B O O R V U 6 1 4 I;,,_•, -g-„[ • map, prepared by the Kodiak Island Borough .. Community Development Department, 2005 KODIAK BOROUGH [ PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ®RAFT ■ MINUTES March 16, 2011 6:30 p.m. in the Assembly Chambers CALL TO ORDER CHAIR TORRES called to order the March 16, 2011 regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission at 6:34 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE CHAIR TORRES led the pledge of allegiance. ROLL CALL Commissioners present were Dave King, Brent Watkins, Casey Janz, Bill Kersch, Alan Torres, Jay Baldwin, and Alan Schmitt. A quorum was established. Community Development Department staff present was Bud Cassidy, Director and Sheila Smith, Secretary. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COMMISSIONER JANZ MOVED to approve the March 16, 2011 Planning & Zoning Commission agenda. VOICE VOTE ON MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY APPROVAL OF MINUTES COMMISSIONER JANZ MOVED to approve the February 16, 2011 Planning & Zoning Commission minutes. VOICE VOTE ON MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY AUDIENCE COMMENTS AND APPEARANCE REQUESTS There were no audience comments and appearance requests. PUBLIC HEARINGS A) Case 11 -014. Request a Rezone, according to KIBC 17.205.030.B & C (Manner of Initiation), to consider the rezone of Lots D -2, H -1, H -2, G -2 and G -1, U.S. Survey 3218 from B- Business (Lot G -1), and RR1 -Rural Residential One (Lots D -2, H -1, H -2 and G -2), to R3- Multi- family Residential. (The scope of this case was expanded from Lot G -1 by the commission at the January 19, 2011 meeting to include Lots D -2, H -1, H -2 and G -2.) The applicants are Bruce & Lila Beehler. The location is 3241, 3265, 3283, 3303 and 3325 Mill Bay Road, and the zoning is B- Business (G -1) and RR1 -Rural Residential One (D -2, H -1, H -2, and G -2.) Cassidy reported the commission postponed this case last month and moved to enlarge the rezone area due to concern about spot zoning. RR1 is a rural residential district and probably inappropriate on Mill Bay Road. R3- Multifamily Residential zoning makes more sense than Business because of topography concerns that exists on the backs of those lots. These folks that live there will be grandfathered in their current nonconforming use so they can exist as is. 3/16/2011 P &Z Minutes Page 1 of 8 Forty public hearing notices were sent out with 2 returned; one in favor of the rezone and one opposing. COMMISSIONER KING MOVED to recommend the rezone of Lots D -2, H -1, H -2 and G -2, U.S. Survey 3218, from RR1 -Rural Residential One to R3- Multi- family Residential, and the rezone of Lot G -1, U.S. Survey 3218, from B- Business to R3- Multi - family Residential, and forward this case to the borough assembly with a recommendation for approval, and; To adopt the findings contained in the staff memorandum dated March 3, 2011, as "findings of fact" for this case. Close regular meeting & open public hearing: There was no public testimony. FINDINGS OF FACT 17.72.020 A. Findin ! s as to the Need and ustification for a Chan t e or Amendment. The four of five lots in the rezone area is currently zoned RR1 -Rural Residential One which is a large lot low density single - family residential zoning district. This zoning appears to be out of place in the context of being totally surrounded by B- Business zoned land. In addition, the lots are located in the urban area along a developed arterial street with excellent access to utilities, schools and services in the area. The fifth lot is zoned B- Business but developed as residential that is similar to the other lots in the aforementioned RR1 zoning district. The petitioners of this lot have requested the rezone initially, but good zoning practice would discourage the treatment of this one lot to a different set of development standards than any of the surrounding lots currently enjoy. Changing the zoning of these five lots to R3 would not have a major impact on the availability of either the RR1 -Rural Residential One or B- Business zoned land. Generally, multi - family residential is considered a good fit with commercially zoned land as it is an allowed use in some form in all urban commercial zones where municipal water and sewer are available. There may be some concerns about the mixed use nature of the area surrounding the rezone area (B- Business zoned land). On the whole, however, the rezone has more positive attributes than negative, hence the recommendation to make the zoning change from RR1 -Rural Residential One and B- Business to R3- Multi- family Residential. 17.72.020 B. Findings as to the Effect a Change or Amendment would have on the Objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The 2008 Kodiak Island Borough Comprehensive Plan Update recommends this area for Rural Residential for four of the five affected lots. The fifth lot is recommended to remain Commercial /Business. While it is appropriate to give the plan due deference in these matters, it is clear from review that these designations are not fully consistent with the kinds of land uses currently developed in the area and that the plan designation is largely derived from the prior zoning map and the fact that no one was specifically concerned with the zoning of this area at the time the plan was being compiled. Investigation of the rezone indicates a substantial disconnect between the prevailing commercial zoning and development context of the rezone area which can only be remedied by a deviation from the express designations of the comprehensive plan. This, therefore, may be an exceptional situation whereby the due deference accorded the plan must yield to the more practical and realistic considerations pertaining to the rezone area and how this area can be of benefit to the overall community in the light of future development and use potential represented by these five lots. (ROLL CALL VOTE ON MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY) 3/16/2011 P &Z Minutes Page 2 of 8 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH AGENDA STATEMENT APRIL 7, 2011 REGULAR MEETING ITEM NO: 13.D.1 TITLE: Mayoral Appointment to the Architectural /Engineering Review Board. SUMMARY: On March 8, 2011, Mr. Sonny Vinberg submitted an application for the vacant seat on the Architectural /Engineering Review Board for a term to expire December 2011. 2.125.010 Established. There is established the architectural /engineering review board, which shall consist of seven voting members, to be appointed by the mayor. 2.100.030 Appointments. Members of boards, committees, and commissions, except for members of the board of adjustment, members of the board of equalization, and elected service area board members, are appointed by the mayor and confirmed by the assembly unless otherwise specifically provided elsewhere in this code. An appointment not confirmed by the assembly shall not become effective. The mayor shall appoint a new applicant until an appointment is confirmed by the assembly. The mayor may not appoint again the same person whose confirmation was failed by the assembly for the same board, committee, or commission until the next annual appointment process unless authorized by the assembly. FISCAL NOTES: Account No.: Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Required: APPROVAL FOR AGENDA: p RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to confirm the mayoral appointment of Mr. Sonny Vinberg to the Architectural /Engineering Review Board for a term to expire December 2011. "� ' Kodiak Island Borough ��� ate s Sir Office of the Borougl1 e t E '7 E J" .14 P 710 Mill Bay Roads ` __ , � Kodiak, Alaska 996 51 mu 7 2011 i j ( ;, Phone (907) 486 -9310 Fax (907) 486 -9391 EMAIL: njavier @,kodiaka .us, _ — ` t.Lra uu—Fl S OFFICE J BOARD APPLICATION NAME: HGli9e t SSow\ VV. vjl,jy, JV' HOME PHONE: V12 WORK: 4 3O CELL NO: a% No E -MAIL: kVIVtioer's g kovica, co W1 STREET ADDRESS: 3333 S(4P.rajin ad. 4A-7- ietk, A g. 111615 MAILING ADDRESS: P.0• £ 78 Kodiak, Ark 9 LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN KODIAK: 9 MOS. IN ALASKA: B mos. ARE YOU A REGISTERED VOTER IN KODIAK? YES] NO ( ) ARE YOU A PROPERTY OWNER IN KODIAK? YES ( ) NO pi COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: radial kkaw( &Is (2(, {G1W.AG member, K(f) nnF Rewrite, P,G PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES: Kw1CC vwis4 (/ PAZ je-wreii PAC, Kaiok Island 6-15 (Ate / Ayvte.vtrag Jvidilmfr if 4Yrkiferis 1 ail VrCaM ( CwAvlu ( of Arekufecfs f- trinolfevic AREA OF EXPERTIS A D/• R EDUCAT ON: i. r ii 1 . r 4 A Lg ♦ 1 A M 4 i f" ' I A A • ' S I % C(11 tt 5 •' i} tgey aF 'Ica/like-6r 4- n___ - IA of WtC fi mgh - c4 e iM I AM INTERESTED IN SERVING ON THE FOLLOWING BOARD(S) (List in order of preference) 1. Avt L eU e J1Weirmj ge V f , zq / , rJ 2. 3. J 4. adra !a�'� /I�, a 3 78720// Sid n. ure Da A resume or letter of interest may be attached, but is not required. This application will be kept on file for one year. Please return the ap by the advertised deadline. / ` ('[� "�\"/ • STAFF USE ONLY - Voter IC No Verlrtei By . J Gott npny4ge Appointment Letter: Appf cents Residence; Barhh( qty( ) Roster. Cate Appdnled: Oath of Office: Term Expires on Flnandel Cisdoeum: Comments: , .�{yp „ KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH fr '65'1111-.47- y',thy',' =' ` t v t il ter �i3 r Ht lI 4 + }f A R�CHITET - T�UR;AL+ /ESNG EIERI REVIEW BOARD BJIIL I CrO D i . y r ARD�OF , 5' LS & ��ti''` �5 `i�Nn" "- 2=rfuslla ` Te+tia£sF', tr;�L ....:w tw S�i�tu� ta NAME TERM HOME WORK CELL EMAIL PHONE PHONE PHONE Scott Bonney 2011 486 -4005 350 -5844 stralaska(Whotmail.com PO Box 5524 Chiniak, AK 99615 Cliff Ford 2012 486 -5353 486 -7742 539 -5340 clifff(Wacsalaska.net 1250 Beaver Way Kodiak, AK 99615 Gregg Hacker (Chair) 2013 486 -4392 481 -2283 539 -5230 ghacker01(a kodiakschools.org PO Box 967 Kodiak, AK 99615 -0967 Ray Nordgulen 2012 486 -3719 539 -1639 nordqulenwings 274 Neva Way Kodiak, AK 99615 Brent Watkins (Vice Chair) 2013 brentski22na yahoo.com 307 Childs Drive Kodiak, AK 99615 Vacant 2011 Assembly Representative Jerrol Friend 486 -7654 486 -4946 539 -1975 jerrol .friend(Wassembly.kodiakak.us PO Box 175 Kodiak, AK 99615 NON - VOTING EX- OFFICIOS School Board Representative Norm Wooten 539 -1419 nwooten net PO Box 3016 Kodiak, AK 99615 Petal Ruch, Alternate 486 -4705 petalruch(a)kodiakschools.orq This board is governed by Kodiak Island Borough Code 2.125 and 15.45.010 STAt ° ;oily + ING � z 4 tT��E /F DIRECTOR WOODYKON ING , t 14I1 + 486 9343 wkoning a�kod #9v d ws" r yam- E[{ I +' .PtOJECTS MGR /INSPECTOR, KEN'SMITH$ 4 (,486 9341 +' ksmi thCoTkodiakak.us ,OJy. ECTS ASS ISTANi^rJESSIWOLFE'�=Hd`U'z4 -9349 jw olfe(alkodiakak . us ENGINEERING DEP ARTMENT 1k 0140MILL�BAYROAD �- e ': R O O M224• ° ,. ;I! g,T } DIA AK 9 E KODIAK ''AK 99816 u+i,�E, l � 1 Revision Date: 3/8/2011 Revised by: JK KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH AGENDA STATEMENT APRIL 7, 2011 REGULAR MEETING ITEM NO: 13.D.2 TITLE: Confirmation of the Assembly Appointments to the Kodiak Workforce Regional Advisory Council. SUMMARY: There are several designated seats that are vacant on the Kodiak Workforce Regional Advisory Council (KWRAC). Applications were received by the Clerk's office and made available to KWRAC. On March 23, 2011, KWRAC held a regular meeting and reviewed the applications that were received. KWRAC members recommended the appointments of Mr. Tuck Bonney to the Agriculture and Natural Resources seat and Ms. Alisha Drabek to the Citizen at Large seat, both with terms to expire December 2013. 2.155.030 Term, compensation, and appointments. A. The term of each member is three years. The regular term shall, unless otherwise specified by ordinance, commence on January 1st of the year of appointment and shall expire on December 31st of the year the term expires. B. Members of the council shall serve without compensation. C. The clerk shall provide a standard application form for interested persons to complete. The form, letters, or other expressions of interest shall be made to the clerk who shall forward copies to the council. D. The council may submit its nomination of a person from the submitted applications to fill the vacancy to the assembly. The assembly shall appoint a new member selected from the submitted applications for the remaining unexpired term. Vacancies occur and are filled as provided in KIBC 2.100.070. FISCAL NOTES: Account No.: Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Required: APPROVAL FOR AGENDA: p d C25,16). RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to confirm the Assembly appointments of Mr. Tuck Bonney to the Agriculture and Natural Resources seat and Ms. Alisha Drabek to the Citizen at Large seat on the Kodiak Workforce Regional Advisory Council for terms to expire December 2013. y .9 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH of :4 ,4: o I A t w; E ` ON AL ADVISORY COUNCIL KODlA`K W4R • �o z' d1` " �' . d C �l;t�° #s �li� � �sa'�a. �t.,..k NAME TERM WORK CELL EMAIL PHONE PHONE KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH 2013 Borough Mayor Jerome Selby 486 -4833 niavier 710 Mill Bay Road 486 -3391 Kodiak, AK 99615 (Fax) CITY OF KODIAK 2013 City Manager Aimee Kniaziowski 486 -8640 539 -7600 akniaziowski(Wcity.kodiak.ak.us 710 Mill Bay Road, Room 216 Kodiak, AK 99615 UAA KODIAK COLLEGE 2013 Career and Technical Education Coordinator Lorraine Stewart 486 -1209 Istewart .kodiak.alaska.edu 117 Benny Benson Drive 486 -1250 Kodiak, AK 99615 (Fax) KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 2013 School Board Member Peggy Rauwolf 486 -1217 942 -1121 prauwolf(5kodiak.alaska.edu 722 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, AK 99615 FISHERY INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY CENTER 2013 Associate Professor Brian Himelbloom 486 -1529 bhhimelbloomealaska.edu 118 Trident Way 486 -1540 Kodiak, AK 99615 (Fax) Alternate, Quentin Fong gfonq(@sfos. VILLAGE REPRESENTATIVE 2013 Vacant KONIAG, INC. 2013 Manager, Shareholder Relations Jacqueline Madsen 481 -4129 942 -3322 jmadsen 194 Alimaq Drive Kodiak, AK 99615 KODIAK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 2013 Executive Director Trevor Brown 486 -5557 486 -7605 trevor(Thkodiak.orq 100 E. Marine Way, Suite 300 Kodiak, AK 99615 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR KODIAK JOB CENTER 2013 Employment Security Manager Maureen Butler 486 -3105 539 -2104 maureen.butler @alaska.gov 309 Center Street Kodiak, AK 99615 UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 2013 Comptroller and Executive Officer Patrick S. McElligatt, CDR 487 -5180 941 -5118 patrick.s.mcelligattauscg.mil Base Support Unit (BSU) Kodiak, AK Ext. 107 Roster continued on the next page.... Revision Date: 2/17/2011 Revised by: JK KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH fr t1' 9, B; db " knL a': r. yn as pb d • ' `{e a > Pak q I' DIAKRWO OR COUNCIL NAME TERM WORK CELL EMAIL PHONE PHONE AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES 2013 TL&CX bun aR] BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND IT 2013 Family Chiropractic Center Robert Banks 486 -4042 539 -6950 drrhb2(Wgci.net 2414 Mill Bay Road #1 Kodiak, AK 99615 HEALTH AND SPORTS FITNESS 2013 Providence Kodiak Island Medical Center Marjorie DeGreef 486 -9567 660 -621- mariorie .degreefA PO Box 8682 1487 Kodiak, AK 99615 HUMAN RESOURCE SERVICES 2013 ARCHITECTURE, CONSTRUCTION, AND ENGINEERING 2013 Koniag, Inc. Sonny Vinberg 486 -2530 907 -306- hvinberq(aakoniaq.com PO Box 78 3876 Kodiak, AK 99615 ARTS AND COMMUNICATION 2013 CITIZEN AT LARGE 2013 PcLi S\ 9 Qk geY -- EX-OFFICIO STAFF Kodiak Island Borough School District Superintendent Stewart McDonald 486 -6202 stewart.mcdonaldc kodiakschools.orq 722 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, AK 99615 This board is governed by Kodiak Island Borough Code 2.155 FF: p a _z �i. k4s''°(x? t r rtj 't "b i . �+.1y�' $t d KIBSDADMINISTRATIVE BONNIE BAKER 481 -6202 bonnie.baker(Wkodiakschools.orq t t5e"- N nr ✓ r a; BOROUGH ASSISTANT CLERK JESSICA KILBORN" 486 9311 jkilborn(Wkodiakak.us KODIAK { ISLAND BOROUGH SCHOOL DISTRICT h ' OFFICE OF THE BOROUGH CLERK OFFICEOFTHE SUPERINTENDENT ",� 4 710 MILL BAY ROAD 72Z aI e "'x ; ROOM 101 KOD AK 9 5 1 t Vi _, KODAK, AK 99615 Revision Date: 2/17/2011 Revised by: JK Kodiak Island Borough the Office of the Borough Clerk I v s s 710 Mill Bay Road ?Kb. 44 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 g,, t Phone (907) 486 -9310 Fax (907) 4$6- 939411 2 i 201: EMAIL: njavicrfrilkodiakak : us BOARD APPLICATION NAME: AlishaS. Drabck HOME PHONE: 907- 539 -5015 WORK: same CELL NO: same EMAIL: nljshaabunaworks.cgm or alisha©ridenkimbo.com STREET ADDRESS: 4286 Parkside Drive Kodia AK g9fi15 MAILING ADDRESS: PO Box 261, Kodiak. AK 99615 LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN KODIAK: life (38 years) IN ALASKA: 38 years (except winters for school) ARE YOU A REGISTERED VOTER IN KODIAK? YES (x) NO'() ARE YOU A PROPERTY OWNER IN KODIAK? YES (x) NO ( ) COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: Member of Qik'rtarmiut Alutiit Committee with Alutiiq Museum Participate in leadership and education project planning PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES: Serve as Facilitator for the KANA / Konj%%g Roundtable: Co - Eacilitat r for Kodiak Regional liural i:orum; Freelance consultant for several Kodiak tribal organizations in developing education & economic development projects; Serve as advisor and evaluator on related projects; Work as Alutiiq Language Teacher Currently developing own business tor youth and community recreation (action sports), AKIMBO. AREA OF EXPERTISE AND/OR EDUCATION: BA in English, American Literature; MFA in Creative Writing; PhD Candidate in Indigenous Studies Alutiiq Language Teacher;. Former English Professor; Tribal Grants Consultant for Culture & Education I AM INTERESTED IN SERVING ON THE FOLLOWING BOARD(S) (List in order of preference) 1. Kodiak Workforce Regional Advisory Council 2. 3:. - (,c t yLt - - er -- 4. _ 0 1. n }- March 21, 2011 Sig at ter it Date - - A resume Weiler interest may be attached, but is not required. This application w31 be kept on file for one year. Please return the application by the advertised deadline. -STAFF USE ONLY. Venn le No Wm., e(.. � Y11 Ojn nebef� ApprAMn rd LaroY -- _v____.___ MOtlFnrta Nealdela Date Anointed: Oen, of Sot _ „ Ton ERAree' M: FPVOdI YR: �_�� .••• Conrows: .. —•-•.- —.•• 907 406 5164 ALASKA PACIFICSEAFOO 11:16:49 a. m. 02 -25 -2011 111 Kodiak Island Borough Office o the Borough f h Clerk S 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Phone (907) 486 -9310 Fax (907) 486 -9391 EMAIL; njaviernu,kodiakak.us BOARD APPLICATION NAME: (— ..- c- \A V D HOME PHONE: 6' 3 l c1 WORK: ti - 2 Z3 V CELL NO: C 3 - 23 v y E- MAIL : —wato ee.- -dr p u Y c r.p t S STREET ADDRESS: ?, 4 3 (• .far MAILING ADDRESS: P A A 0x 2.2- L c LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN KODIAK: go yu IN ALASKA: CC y-a-- r ARE YOU A REGISTERED VOTER IN KODIAK? YES (A NO ( ) ARE YOU A PROPERTY OWNER IN KODIAK? YES pQ NO ( ) COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES: it FEB 2. 4 2011 AREA OF EXPERTISE AND /OR EDUCATION: I AM7NT IN SERVING ON THE FOLLOWING BOARD(S) (List In order of preference) y 1. kat k tN o•k• ce- 'k orr� Al.: for t^/k.sJ2, I {*r Jr t lJ re_ kj .. L /� eactL `GJ 3. 4. V Signature Date A resume or letter of Interest mey be attached, bul Is not required. This application will be kept on file for one year. Please retum the application by the advertised deadline. • STAFF USE ONLY• Vote ID No Vet I9 . ii Documentation' Alpninenent Lever A4anrsReisa.ce: r• � CtiT ) Roster. Dale Ayry.+N;tna: Oetn of ORae: Tem, Evpnf on- Flnenciel Db4aure : Comments: Kodiak Island Borough Office of the Borough Clerk " : s 710 Mill Bay Road 4,41) Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Phone (907) 486 -9310 Fax (907) 486 -9391 t7, EMAIL: njavierAkodiakak.us BOARD APPLICATION NAME: )..77? / yy J 477/ /� HOME PHONE: 1 ys�® / WORK: Yr/i`LT yS-3 CELL N t S� 4 � LS , // t E -MAIL: crrt vLGI /� /fly/ / L°J i i 1� �� 0_0 I ... } STREET ADDRESS: /32.. 2r7A dilaA , 'not r !, j'AN 4 2011 MAILING ADDRESS: d &X 2,9/ /y i; , t i LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN KODIAK: ,33 f IN ALASKA: 473 l i ' O_FfCE ARE YOU A REGISTERED VOTER IN KODIAK? YES.( NO ( ) ARE YOU A PROPERTY OWNER IN KODIIAJ? YES O. NO ( ) COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: — �d4'�Qraf�/C)®/7d'i f GI; eta PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES: Cdcifrayeia/ Ar eliel /7411 d-e& 1 7j77o4 ; Lern k % L- IJUg&,> 7fiehide5 1-e�/j AREA OF EXPERTISE AND /OR EDUCATION: - AA- Ec a /N I AM INTERESTED IN SERVING ON THE FOLLOWING BOARD(S) (List in order of preference) 1.M� ���,kr/ Ivy t` fl , C�tl# pr1,�L Q 2. 3. 4. //.// Signatur j / Dat A resum; • letter of interest may be attached, but is not required. This application will be kept on file for one year. Please return the application by the advertised deadline. • STAFF USE ONLY - Voter IDNoVedfiedB Documentation: Appointment letter: Applicants Residence; a ( City Roster: Date Appointed: Oath of Office Term Expires on Financial Disclosure: Comments: KODIAK WORKFORCE REGIONAL ADVISORY COUNCIL Regular Meeting March 23, 2011 A regular meeting of the Kodiak Workforce Regional Advisory Council was held on Wednesday, March 23, 2011, in the Fishery Industrial Technology Center. The meeting was called to order at 12:07 p.m. Council members present were Chairperson Jerome Selby, Robert Banks, Trevor Brown, Maureen Butler. Brian Himelbloom, Jacqueline Madsen, Peggy Rauwolf, Lorraine Stewart, and Sonny Vinberg. Ex Officio member present was Kodiak Island Borough School District Superintendent Stewart McDonald. Staff present was Kodiak Island Borough School District Administrative Assistant Bonnie Baker. Citizens 'l' at large included John Durham, Alexandra Oliveira, Louis Garcia�, Cullenberg, and Julie Matweyou. .t Council members absent were CDR Patrick McElligatt, Marjorie DeGreef, and Aimee Kniaziowski. r_ APPROVAL OF AGENDA ft s; BROWN moved to approve the agenda as submittScht ; VOICE VOTE ON MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY APPROVAL OF MINUTES ° d r HIMELBLOOM moved to approve the meeting minutes of Februaryj'I6. 2011. VOICE VOTE ON MOT UNANIMOUSLY. fitir CITIZENS' COMMENTS , , Paula Cullenberg, FITFi shery Industrial Technology Center) Interim Director and Director of UAF $ / (University of Alaska Fairbanks)aRural:Advisbry Program, thanked Brian Himelbloom for organizing the meeting and n 3 trodticed J lived ulie Mat tryats wey y ou, Gene - en 'c�ea M w * a ap \Agent for the Kodiak Region. Ms. Cullenberg encourN {fhe Counci e w lhel to niera •commumty rect with Ms. M garding atwey Das her job wa to provide technical assistance for trammg and�to network fishing ind . ustry REPORTS � titx- 11" g $ Paula Cullenberg reported UAF was currently conducting a program review of FITC and the outcome could include an expansion of iis` seafood program. In addition, there was a strong possibility the .'..,r. Department of Labor wouldsprtner wnh UAF to create a comprehensive workforce development plan for the fishing industry state- wtde� d workforce needs and prerequisite training. Stewart McDonald reported seventy -three local businesses had responded to the KWRAC Employment Survey to date and a follow -up email and /or telephone call would be made to the businesses that did not respond. The Council directed the survey subcommittee to compile the survey response information into a straightforward format to review at the next meeting. Administrative Assistant's note: A four -page survey result handout was distributed to each member present. STEWART reported Kodiak College was seeking KWRAC's support in a quest to expand their welding program and obtain UAA (University of Alaska Anchorage) approval to procure a new facility to house Kodiak Workforce Regional Advisory Council Regular Meeting — March 23, 2011 Page 2 of 3 it. The Council directed Ms. Stewart to submit a draft letter of support and full description of the project for review at the next meeting. BUTLER announced a free construction academy would take place April 9 -30, 2011, with an application deadline of April 4, 2011. The academy would utilize both Kodiak College and Kodiak High School facilities to build a storage shed for the football field. Fifteen students would be accepted to the academy with the opportunity to attain numerous certifications. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None. NEWBUSINESS ,r A Council' Appointment Recommendationsto the Borough Assembly It Agriculture and Natural Resources; RAUWOLF moved to appoint Tuck Bonney to theAgriculture and Natural Resources seat. VOICE VOTE ON MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 2" Clhzen at. Large 4.1 4 4.0 1, STEWART'moved.to appoint Alisha Drabek -to the Citizenlat Large';sea VOICE VOTE ON MOTION` CARRIED' UNANIMOUSLY: CITIZENS' COMMENTS Julie Matweyou er gusted to beTytaon thexKVVRAC information distribution list. 1 i ti u COUNCIL MEMRERS\COMMENTS BROWN announced the Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development would be Wit hosting business development workshops l during ComFish, April 14 -16, 2011. In addition, Senator Begich would be available to answer questions regarding the fishing industry. BUTLER announced the v GovernoTcampaign; "Choose Respect" rally would take place on March 31, 2011, and was organized Wthe rodiak Women's Resource and Crisis Center. HIMELBLOOM thanked the Council for holding its meeting at FITC and welcomed future meetings. He provided details regarding the Kodiak Area Marine Science Symposium, April 9 -12, 2011, at the Kodiak Convention Center as well as an open house at FITC the evening of April 1 1, 2011. MCDONALD thanked Maureen Butler for her work with Junior Achievement and commended the group's focus on entrepreneurship; suggested Kodiak College look into existing business warehouses in the community as an option to accommodate evening welding/construction classes; and reported math courses up to pre - calculus were being offered in the rural schools this year, thus work had begun to prepare these students for future challenges. Kodiak Workf orce Regional Advisory cu +l Regular Meeting —rch X3&0 Page 3 of 3 ADJOURN With no obj m+ meeting was adjourned at 12:50 p.m. KO >&,mAN D BOROUGH ATTEST: Mayor Jerome M. Selby. Chair - Bonnie Bak m Administrative AssAssistant � m « { f «. . � \ $ d � "99„;10:-.. 14 1. . » last «, >� \ G � �; a } � , » \2 .. �� ‹ 111 1N:., w \ . y � � » KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH AGENDA STATEMENT APRIL 7, 2011 REGULAR MEETING ITEM NO: 13.0.3 TITLE: Declaring a Seat on the Solid Waste Advisory Board Vacant. SUMMARY: On March 29, 2011, Mr. Gary "Turk" Martin submitted a notice of resignation from the Solid Waste Advisory Board for a term to expire December 2012. 2.100.070 Vacancies. A. Other than by expiration of the member's term, the assembly shall declare a seat vacant when a member: 2. Resigns and the resignation is accepted; D. In the event of a vacancy on a board, committee, or commission for any reason other than normal expiration of a term of office, the clerk shall cause notice thereof to be published at least twice in a newspaper of general circulation within the borough. The notice shall set forth the vacancies and any qualifications of members. The appointing authority shall appoint a new member for the remaining unexpired term in accordance with KIBC 2.100.030. FISCAL NOTES: Account No.: Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Required: APPROVAL FOR AGENDA: dth RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to accept, with regret, the resignation of Mr. Gary "Turk" Martin from the Solid Waste Advisory Board for a term to expire December 2012, and direct the Borough Clerk to advertise the vacancy per Borough code. 03-29-11 S.W.A.B. Committee I, Gary T Martin must resign this board due to obligations related to my career as I am traveling out of town for the next several years. Thank- you for the opportunity to serve this board. Sincerely, rf" r- 1 11 \ 1 !Lh 11; i? IL I: MAR 2 2 2011 ,L C :){ TIE I Kodiak Island Borough Assembly Regular Meeting Guidelines April 7, 2011, 7:30 p.m., Borough Assembly Chambers Please announce: Please remember to turn off ringers on your cell phones or put them on vibrate. 1. INVOCATION Captain John Quinn of the Salvation Army. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL KIBC 2.16.070.... the Chair shall cause the record to reflect the absence of the member, the REASON for the absence, and whether the absence is excused by the Assembly. Recommended motion: Move to excuse Assembly member Friend who is absent due to personal leave. VOICE VOTE ON MOTION. 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA All items listed with an asterisk ( *) are considered to be routine and non - controversial by the Assembly and will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless an Assembly member so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. All items in yellow are consent agenda items. Summary of Consent Agenda Items: *Regular Meeting Minutes of March 3 and March 17, 2011. *Declaring a Seat on the Solid Waste Advisory Board Vacant. Recommended motion: Move to approve the agenda and consent agenda. VOICE VOTE ON MOTION. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. *Regular Meeting Minutes of March 3 and March 17, 2011. 6. AWARDS AND PRESENTATIONS A. Child Abuse Prevention Month Proclamation — Mayor Selby B. Sexual Assault Awareness Month Proclamation — Mayor Selby C. Student of the Month for March 2011 — Mayor Selby • Michael Inga, Senior at Old Harbor School Kodiak Island Borough Assembly Guidelines April 7, 2011 Page 1 10. BOROUGH MANAGER'S REPORT 11. MESSAGES FROM THE BOROUGH MAYOR 12. UNFINISHED BUSINESS — None. 13. NEW BUSINESS A. Contracts 1. Contract No. FY2011 -28 Kodiak High School Old Pool Reclamation Project. Recommended motion: Move to authorize the manager to execute Contract No. FY2011 -28 with Brechan Enterprises, Inc. of Kodiak, Alaska for the Kodiak High School Old Pool Reclamation Project in an amount not to exceed $260,699. Staff Report — Manager Gifford Assembly discussion and amendments may be offered at this time. ROLL CALL VOTE ON MOTION. B. Resolutions 1. Resolution No. FY2011 -24 Supporting a Bill to End Requirements That Employers Who Terminate Some or All Participation in the Public Employees Retirement System of Alaska Pay Termination Costs and Making the Changes Retroactive. Recommended motion: Move to adopt Resolution No. FY2011 -24. Staff Report — Manager Gifford Assembly discussion and amendments may be offered at this time. ROLL CALL VOTE ON MOTION. C. Ordinances for Introduction 1. Ordinance No. FY2011 -14 Rezoning Lot G -1, U.S. Survey 3218, From B- Business To R3- Multifamily Residential, and Lots D -2, H -1, H -2 and G -2, U.S. Survey 3218, From RR1 -Rural Residential One To R3- Multifamily Residential. Recommended motion: Move to adopt Ordinance No. FY2011 -14 in first reading to advance to public hearing at the next regular meeting of the Assembly. Staff report — Manager Gifford Assembly discussion and amendments may be offered at this time. ROLL CALL VOTE ON MOTION. Kodiak Island Borough Assembly Guidelines April 7, 2011 Page 3 D. Other Items 1. Confirmation of the Mayoral Appointment to the Architectural /Engineering Review Board. Recommended motion: Move to confirm the mayoral appointment of Mr. Sonny Vinberg to the Architectural /Engineering Review Board for a term to expire December 2011. Staff report — Clerk Javier Assembly discussion. ROLL CALL VOTE ON MOTION. 2. Confirmation of the Assembly Appointments to the Kodiak Workforce Regional Advisory Council. Recommended motion: Move to confirm the Assembly appointments of Mr. Tuck Bonney to the Agriculture and Natural Resources seat and Ms. Alisha Drabek to the Citizen at Large seat on the Kodiak Workforce Regional Advisory Council for terms to expire December 2013. Staff report — Clerk Javier Assembly discussion. ROLL CALL VOTE ON MOTION. 3. *Declaring a Seat on the Solid Waste Advisory Board Vacant. 14. CITIZENS' COMMENTS (These are limited to three minutes per speaker.) Read phone numbers: Local is 486 -3231. Please ask speakers to: 1. sign in 2. state their name for the record 3. turn on the microphone before speaking 15. ASSEMBLY MEMBER COMMENTS Announcements — Mayor Selby The Assembly will hold a special work session on Tuesday, April 12, 2011, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers. The next Assembly work session will be held on Thursday, April 14, 2011, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Conference Room and the next regular meeting of the Assembly is scheduled on Thursday, April 21, 2011, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers. Kodiak Island Borough Assembly Guidelines April 7, 2011 Page 4 16. ADJOURNMENT Recommended motion: Move to adjourn the meeting. ROLL CALL VOTE ON MOTION. Kodiak Island Borough Assembly Guidelines April 7, 2011 Page 5 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ASSEMBLY ROLL CALL SHEET W !� Regular Special //�� G Date: _ (1vD OD Convened: Recessed: 50 Reconvened: I ' Adjourned: \ t I � / BY: BY: V BY: `),l-�h V .f/d BY: ari , I. BY: SiclA "- SECOND: SECOND : SECOND:!! " """____ __ S�''v l� , SECOND: I ��� SECOND: �l � ise ,ty, , giv „,,, ,,,v , YES NO' YES, NO YES' NO . .YES _ NO, YES' NO • • Ms. Austerman ,/ Ms. Austerman Ms. Austerman Ms. Austermat Ms. Austermalr I / Mr. Friend ✓ Mrfriend - M- Fi e „d `fVlr I'rren Mr. Friend Ms. Fulp ✓ Ms. Fulp Ms. Fulp Ms. Fulp Ms. Fulp Ms. Jeffrey 7 Ms. Jeffrey Ms. Jeffrey Ms. Jeffrey Ms. Jeffrey v / Mr. Kaplan V/ Mr. Kaplan Mr. Kaplan Mr. Kaplan Mr. Kaplan / V Ms. Lynch / Ms. Lynch Ms. Lynch Ms. Lynch Ms. Lynch V Ms. Stutes / Ms. Stutes Ms. Stutes Ms. Stutes Ms. Stutes ,/ CHANGE V OF VOTE? HANGE OF VOTE? CHANGE OF VOTE? CHANGE OF VOTE? CHANGE OF VOTE? CHANGE OF VOTE ?j TOTAL: TOTAL: TOTAL: TOTAL: TOTAL: The mayor may not vote except in the case where only six members of the assembly are present and there is a three /three tie vote of the assembly. / Mayor Selby V / Mayor Selby Mayor Selby Mayor Selby Mayor Selby Vf KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH Date: 0#1011.;‘,0 OUGH ASSEMBLY ROLL CALL SHEET 0#1011.;‘,0 CCC///�� Regular Special �� Convened: Recessed: 6o �v Reconvened: D 7 Adjourned: BY: � BY: f\1J 44?yyJ71) B Y: ' BY: BY: 0 tilr SECOND. SECOND: SECOND: 1 * SECOND: SECOND: , ■\-a-er ' ,(� a s , D` de -14 `.. YES NO . YES NO Ms. Austerman / Ms. Austerm , / Ms. Austerman ✓ Ms. Austerman ✓ Ms. Austerman 7 rf Mriend v Mr Friend v Mr. Friend Mr. Friend Mr Frian Ms. Fulp * / I Ms. Fulp ✓ Ms. Fulp / Ms. Fulp Ms. Fulp Ms. Jeffrey 4/ /* Ms. Jeffrey Ms. Jeffrey Ms. Jeffrey V Ms. Jeffrey ✓ Mr Kaplan / Mr. Kaplan ` Mr. Kaplan ✓ Mr. Kaplan 7 Mr. Kaplan Ms. Lynch V Ms. Lynch V � / Ms. Lynch ✓ Ms. Lynch V Ms. Lynch V ✓ Ms. Stutes V Ms. Stutes V Ms. Stutes > Ms. Stutes Ms. Stutes _;CHANGE OF VOTE? HANGEOF VOTE? CHANGE OF VOTE? CHANGE OF VOTE? CHANGE OF VOTE? CHANGE OF VOTE ?(_` TOTAL: TOTAL: to U TOTAL: / (0 TOTAL: L 0 TOTAL: e lJ f'1 The mayor may not vote except in the case where only six members of the assembly are present and there is a three /three tie vote of the assembly. Mayor Selby , j Mayor Selby Mayor Selby Mayor Selby Mayor Selby / KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ASSEMBLY ROLL CALL SHEET `v) Regular �/ Special Date: 4l1� i( Convened: Recessed: Reconvened Adjourned: t' • co BY: 1 BY: J f ( 1 I BY: BY: BY: • SECOND: (t ' 1 I r SECOND: SECOND: _ I SECOND: SECOND: e ovkdice2 446,v .. YES ` NO • _ ' YES NO ' , - NO • - - . YES NO - ' ; ` ' - „ YES . NO Ms. Austerman ✓ Ms. Austermatt ✓ Ms. Austerman , / Ms. Austerman Ms. Austerman -Mr Fri end -- Mr- Friend - Ntr-ffriend— v pAfir€Fiend __ML.._Fr.iend_ Ms. Fulp ✓ Ms. Fulp ✓ Ms. Fulp A ✓ Ms. Fulp Ms. Fulp Ms. Jeffrey Ms. Jeffrey Ms. Jeffrey , / Ms. Jeffrey Ms. Jeffrey Mr. Kaplan 1 Mr. Kaplan , / Mr. Kaplan V • / Mr. Kaplan Mr. Kaplan Ms. Lynch v , / Ms. Lynch v ✓ Ms. Lynch �/ / Ms. Lynch Ms. Lynch ' Ms. Stutes V Ms. Stutes ✓ Ms. Stutes V Ms. Stutes Ms. Stutes {CHANGE OF VOTE? HANGE OF VOTE? CHANGE OF VOTE? CHA E OF VOTE? CHANGE OF VOTE? CHANGE OF VOTE & TOTAL: I u TOTAL: (a O TOTAL: ( 0 TOTAL: TOTAL: The mayor may not vote except in the case where only six members of the assembly are present and there is a three /three tie vote of the assembly. Mayor Selby Mayor Selby Mayor Selby Mayor Selby Mayor Selby KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ASSEMBLY MEETING Regular Meeting of: ApoI 7, D2DII please PRINT your name Please PRINT your name ■ k..kplidei ,j) 00-“44i4-1-.J olylic g /G;i S2 4A A/ 6rcc r l OL Pa-7 15- :-.--.4110 = saii• ( 1;.A.0 Sim,,,,,,,J4)),(-7--ta.v Li. , 0,,, 5 i Prvt )L fiy ( SliktvAi , kikre, (1W S, Pr -( H- )G- «t, o / � 4'a-, achyy-��, Sr ce /�r / �J 1 esq.. ►►: VE►:\I its . _ At /. l /-0frity Vlatitiecso 4 - K a jiKehil / ,, H .e- S� 7 S ,.r, amer �if 11/ an/ 9 7C5� gio(zw a ' 2 r r� n /4 ell c71 rr\e , a� � S-6 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ASSEMBLY MEETING Regular Meeting of: Please PRINT your name Please PRINT your name L.i /Th 5essen9e9 & Van Turn, LLC 3 10 K Street, Suite 200 Anchorage, AK. 99501 (907) 278 -2000 (907) 278-2001- fax www. law.com pvantuyn @earthlink.net March 22, 2010 Eric Olson, Chairman Chris Oliver, Executive Director North Pacific Fishery Management Council Via facsimile (907 -271 -2817) and courtesy electronic mail (eolson @gci.net, chris.oliver @noaa.gov; maria.shawback @noaa.gov) Re: Request for standing agenda item — fair and equitable allocation in the Crab Rationalization program Dear Chairman Olson and Executive Director Oliver, I am writing on behalf of the Bering Sea Aleutian Islands (BSAI) Crab Crewman's Association with a request that the North Pacific Fishery Management Council adopt a standing agenda item to address data needs and allocation and compensation inequities in the crab rationalization program ( "CR program "), especially as they relate to crew. The Crewman's Association represents over 170 crewmembers and skippers, with between 65 -80 still prosecuting the NP crab fisheries, 19 previous skippers, and four vessel owners: with over 2,500 total years of combined experience crab fishing in the BSAI. This letter provides background and justification for this request. Please include copies of this letter in the Council notebooks for the 203` Plenary Session — under D -3 staff tasking as well as under C-4 BSAI Crab Management Issues. As you know, the Magnuson Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act mandates, among other things, the following: If it becomes necessary to allocate or assign fishing privileges among various United States fishermen, such allocation shall be (A) fair and equitable to all such fishermen; ... (C) carried out in such manner that no particular individual, corporation, or other entity acquires an excessive share of such privileges. 16 U.S.C. 1851(a)(4) (National Standard 4). In 2002, then- Council Chair David Benton, writing on behalf of the Council, reported to Congress on the Council's progress in analyzing North Pacific fishery management options. In that report, he stated with respect to the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands crab fisheries that: the Council has concluded that these fisheries, their participants, and dependent communities would benefit from rationalization. Rationalization will improve economic conditions substantially, for all sectors of the crab industry. Community concerns and the need to provide for economic protections for hired crew will be addressed. Council letter to Congress (August 2002); available at http: / /www. fakr. noaa.gov/ npfmc / current_ issues /crabB SAlcrab %20report%20to %20congres s 802 .pdf. In 2004, then - Council Chair Stephanie Madsen, writing on behalf of the Council, also committed in the context of the proposed crab allocation rule that the program will improve economic conditions substantially, for all sectors of the crab industry. Community concerns and the need to provide for economic protections for hired crew are addressed. . Council Letter to NMFS (December 2004); available at http: / /www.fakr.noaa.aov /npfmc /current issues /crab /crabcomments1204.pdf. Yet to date, the Council has failed to live up to its obligation to comply with National Standard 4 with respect to the CR Program. That this is so is supported by numerous factors, including the Council's formal review of the CR Program. Five -Year Review of the Crab Rationalization Management Program for Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Crab Fisheries (December 2010); available at http: / /www.fakr.noaa.eov /npfmc /current i ssues /crab /SYearRev1210.pdf. The Council acknowledged that crew numbers are now significantly lower in the crab fisheries — nearly 1,000 fewer in Bristol Bay red king crab fishery, and nearly 700 fewer in Bering Sea opilio fishery — and replacing income for some of these crew "is reported to be problematic." Five Year Review at 55 -56. • As to financial losses for crew that remain in the fisheries, the Five Year Review notes that there is "a steady downward trend in the percentage of gross revenues paid to crew" and that the "propensity to charge or deduct IFQ costs for shares received in the initial allocation is said to be increasing over time." Five Year Review at 65, 60. In some cases, the Council acknowledges that the percentage of crew compensation in relation to gross revenues is "less than half' the pre - 2005 levels. Five Year Review at 61. Stated more plainly, and based on direct reports from the reduced numbers of crew that remain in the fishery, compensation has plummeted between 40 and 70% since 2005.' Despite this information, the Council's review only formally discussed inequities to vessel captains in its background "crew shares" discussion. See Five -Year Review at 15 -16. While acknowledging through minor program changes the inequity to vessel captains, the The presentation of general crew compensation facts here should not be interpreted to mean that no crew are willing to present specific settlement documentation once the Council directly addresses crew inequity issues. Neither should it be interpreted to mean that crew accept specific contracts and settlements as legal and legitimate. 2 Council has not addressed crew inequities in the quota allocation, or even considered accurate data to inform a discussion of crew inequities? The Council did note that the overall CR Program "includes" a "crew loan program" to assist crew who so desired to buy crab quota share. Five Year Review at 18. This can hardly be considered "fair and equitable" given that other participants in the fishery (i.e. vessel owners, captains ...), who may or may not have had a similarly long and central business relationship as many crew members to the crab fisheries, were not required to pay for the quota privilege. Moreover, the loan program was not funded for years after the program began, and is only recently supported by a final rule. The crew loan program is not meaningful. Notably, in December 2010 the Council did acknowledge problems with crew share in the BSAI crab fisheries, yet relegated them to an undefined "industry group" to work out. Predictably, this "industry group" has resulted in no process or recommendation to deal with the inequity in the crab fisheries. As the North Pacific Council is aware, data integrity is an important foundation for reasoned decision - making. See e.g., 16 U.S.C. 1801(c)(3) (the "national fishery conservation and management program" must be based upon "the best scientific information available. "). Underlying the fairness and equity concerns in the CR Program is the fact that relevant authorities have abdicated their responsibility to collect data on the program. The Alaska Department of Fish and Game has abandoned efforts to collect this data. Neither did NOAA complete its promised report in time for the Five Year Review. While the Five Year review includes some data, see Five Year Review at 55 -65, as the Review itself notes that many data quality issues combine to "limit the ability to fully and accurately understand crew or captain pay." Five Year Review at note 20, page 56; see also Five Year Review at 59 ( "amounts of any deductions and charges may be inaccurate in the Economic Data Reports" ). All of this combines to undercut the Council's conclusion that crew pay has actually increased since 2005. Five Year Review at 65. And notably these "data quality issues" are fully within the purview of the Council and other authorities to resolve, using existing information. Indeed, the Council's own inquiries to quota share owners as to whether the Council could collect owner -crew contracts and settlement sheets were answered in the affirmative. (December 2010 meeting, 201st Plenary Session C -2 (c)). Including crab crew issues as a standing agenda item will thus also help address these data integrity problems. 2 This is not to say that the program as applied to vessel captains is fair and equitable. Prior to the CR Program captains received a - 12 -15% share, while in the CR Program they received merely 3% of the quota share. This is not fair and equitable, and this aspect of crew inequities should be part of the scope of a standing Council meeting agenda item on this topic. 3 Data integrity issues were well - illustrated by misleading and erroneous testimony submitted on behalf of quota share owners. For example, Professor James Wilen presented testimony on behalf of Bering Sea Crabbers that it is "mistaken to suppose that high lease prices leave less for crew payment" Wilen, BSAI Crab Rationalization Program: Market Mechanisms and Policy Implications at page 2 executive summary (December 2010). When Professor Wilen repeated this assertion in his oral testimony it appeared that even some of his own clients distanced themselves from that erroneous statement. Professor Wilen also appears to believe that crew are somehow wage earning employees of quota share owners instead of independent businessmen and women. Accurate data can dispel the misleading effect of such testimony. 3 As the above discussion demonstrates, despite the legal mandate, and Council commitments and assurances, since its implementation in 2005 the CR Program has resulted in a large loss of crew jobs in the crab fisheries and a large loss in compensation for crew that accomplish the same tasks and take the same, and likely even greater, risks. This is a crippling double whammy for crew. The Council should thus establish a standing agenda item to focus on data integrity and equitable allocation issues in the crab program. Sincerely, /s/ Peter Van Tuyn Peter Van Tuyn Cc: Alaska Governor Sean Parnell Washington Governor Chris Gregoire Oregon Governor John Kitzhaber Alaska Congressional Delegation Washington Congressional Delegation Oregon Congressional Delegation Secretary of Commerce Gary locke NOAA Administrator Jane Lubchenco NMFS Regional Director Jim Balsiger ADFG Cora Campbell • 4 • FAIR & EQUITABLE COMPENSATION & ALLOCATIONS NOT PROVIDED FOR CREWMEN IN THE CRAB RATIONALIZATION PROGRAM March 28, 2011 Secretary Locke, Dr, Lubchenco, & Director Schwaab, We are writing to inform you that the North Pacific Fishery Management Council is not working within the parameters of the MSA with regards to fair and equitable treatment of long term past participants in the North Pacific crab fisheries and the BSAI Crab Rationalization program (CR). The Crewman's Association based in Kodiak, Alaska has 170 crab crewmembers with over 2500 years of Bering Sea crab experience under its knife belt that request that NOAA /NMFS officials inquire into the lack of the NPFMC to follow through with regulatory due process with regards to the MSA. We've spent the last 6 years at NPFMC meetings asking for crew issues to be dealt with, but to this date, little has been done but turning a deaf ear to our problems regarding unfair and inequitable crew compensation compared to historical ratios. We've also made the point that excessive harvest quota shares were issued that has resulted in crewmen having no leverage to acquire fair and equitable compensation. The National Research Council in "Sharing the Fish" was very clear in their findings: In turn, councils must take steps to ensure that the effects of quotas on all members of the fishing community, including skippers, crews, and processors, are adequately addressed. Interested parties other than vessel owners should be considered for receiving quota shares, the committee said. For example, quotas also might be assigned to skippers and crewmembers, who often are paid based on their catch and assume financial and physical risks. Under law, quota programs are required to provide mechanisms for new entrants to participate in fisheries. However, these efforts should not increase the total number of shares awarded. Since before the inception of program, crab crewmen have spoken to the fact that crew needed to be allocated quota to protect their financial interests, and there were two alternatives in the CR Public Review Draft from May 2002 that would have been within the guidelines of 16 U.S.C. 1851(a)(4) (National Standard 4) that were not discussed at the June 2002 NPFMC meeting in Dutch Harbor. We've reiterated the fact that crew compensation and allocations were huge issues, plus coercion has occurred in the industry and has deprived us from gaining any changes to the CR program. We're very upset that the draft report, "POST- RATIONALIZATION RESTRUCTURING OF COMMERCIAL CREW MEMBER OPPORTUNITIES IN BERING SEA AND ALEUTIAN ISLAND CRAB FISHERIES ", by Sepez, Lazrus & Felthoven, that was finished in August of 2008 (except for an executive summary) is not completed and available for use to clarify that the crew was never treated fair and equitably now and previous to the inception of the CR program. We've also are aware of tampering of this report by Pacific Northwest Crab Industry Advisory Committee (PNCIAC) a supposed crab industry group and Alaska Crab Coalition (ACC) a group of quota share holders that shepherded the CR program through Congress. The promise in 2008 was: "We hope to submit the finalized report to the North Pacific Fisheries Management Council by their 12 September, 2008 deadline for their consideration at the upcoming meetings in Anchorage." - From an email correspondence from Lazrus, one of the authors dated 9/4/08 We realize that one of the authors (Sepez) had an aneurism in the Fall of 2008 and we could understand a short delay, but there were two other authors that could have completed the executive summary and now we sit here over two and half years later and it's still not done. We need this document in finalized form, as it proves that excessive quota shares were initially issued and that crewmen are not compensated fair and equitably. [The tampered with version was finally released to the public within the last week!] The NPFMC has declined to even use out suggestions to gather the best data on the CR, as we have asked for over three years for vessel -crew Lay share contracts and crewmen's reconcilable settlement sheets should be a requirement to be submitted to a third party to gather the best economic data for the EDR's in the CR. But they have never even mentioned these documents until the 201 Plenary Session in December of 2010. The EDR data for the 5 year review of crab was not substantial to finish the 5 year review, there was no available data on leasing of the quota shares, since NOAA relegated the information as C grade and thus not considered useful for decision making at the Council. The data on crew compensation was lacking also, as NOAA contractor James E. Wilen revealed at December's meeting that there were only 17 observations. There are only 400 crab crewmen in the Bristol Bay king crab fishery and 420 fishing the Bering Sea opilio crab fishery and 65 and 67 vessels registered to obtain data from. So we're wondering where all the information we need is, to display the exact dollar amounts that are being extracted out of the fishing industry by non- participating quotashare holders /investors — many that do not own vessels? We have models that show approximately $150 million in crew compensations as an aggregate (compared the crews historical ratio of compensation pre - privatization) loss, removed from the economies of the coastal communities. As stakeholders that were left out of the discussions and due process, we have these expectations that would help promote the fixes to the CR program: • We are asking for a placeholder on the NPFMC agenda to deal with crew issues from now until crewmen are satisfied that adjustments to the CR program are fair and equitable. • We want all the crew - vessel Lay Share contracts and reconcilable settlement sheets for each vessel to be a requirement for submission to NOM to gain the best data on the economic changes that the program has created for the industry. • We're asking the Council to act, as we want a motion that requires crewmen, skippers, and vessels owners to be paid their fair and equitable historical compensations ratios /percentage as previous to the CR program. • We want to be paid back damages for the theft of some crew compensations since the inception of the program. Since excess quota shares were given to LLP holders this is a violation of 16 U.S.C. 1851(a)(4) (National Standard 4) (C) (3) (Hi) and we request that the Council follow the law and redistribute quota to crew as a pool, one that would be held by the State of Alaska to enable us to bargain for an industry-wide fair contract for crew compensations as historically received. We've attached five documents that will help you understand the issues and that the NPFMC has not job it's done as sworn representatives to uphold the U.S. Constitution and the MSA. One of the documents is from our attorney requesting a permanent placeholder on the agenda on crew issues. The council has relegated an industry group (with no members recommended and with no authority to act) to fix the crew compensation problems, but the so- called industry group has decided to meet in Seattle and we are Alaskan fishermen that live in Alaska not corporate entities that do not even fish on boats. So, we ask for your help in establishing the corrections to the CR program that did not fulfill its promise: "Rationalization will improve economic conditions substantially, for all sectors of the industry. Community concerns and the need to provide for economic protections for hired crew will be addressed. " — NPFMC former Chairman Dave Benton's letter to Congress on August 5, 2002 - With great concern, Shawn C Dochtermann Executive Director — Crewman's Association Kodiak, Alaska 425 -367 -8777 cell drdrmann@hotmail.com • l Letter to Arne Fuglvog U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski office April 7, 2011 By Shawn Dochtermann — Crewman's Association Arne et al, We really wonder if our delegation in DC works for us after our conversation today regarding the North Pacific Fishery Management Council (NPFMC) and its lack of resolving Crab crewmember issues under the Crab Rationalization (CR) regime. Since when does an aide tell a constituent that a U.S. Senator is not going to be helpful in getting a federal entity to follow the law, and that the delegation as a whole will not be helpful in changing a policy that does not adhere to MSA and other fisheries laws? I've attached the "Damage Control" conspiracy letter that was mailed to two individuals in our community about 4 years ago. It was handed over to the FBI & OLE first, then submitted to the Council a few years ago. If the authorities knew who the author of the letter was and to whomever it was originally addressed, this political game would have been over years ago. But we have no direct knowledge of who wrote it, guided and helped commit this conspiracy -- other than the Council following the scheme of having no motions to address crew inequities and waiting crew out for 5 years. Last week a 2008 ethnographic report on BSAI crab crewmen was finally released to the public, and it tells first hand what the crew & skippers think of the Crab Rationalization program. The authors are Sepez, Lazarus and Felthoven, and the title is: " Post - Rationalization Restructuring of Commercial Crew Member Opportunities in Bering Sea & Aleutian Island Crab Fisheries" Note: this study was tampered with by the Alaska Crab Coalition (ACC) and Pacific Northwest Crab Industry Advisory Committee (PNCIAC) as they put pressure on the authors to change parts of the report and wanted table 4 removed. As the report v\as released. table 4 is now changed and incorrect. as the vessels removed by the buyback should be attributed to the 2005/6 seasons not 2004`5. Therefore. there are more boats, (jobs) positions, and pounds removed in the table's base year which paints a different picture. The total boats and position losses were greater. Crew Positions for Method A corrected would be 1,024 jobs lost. but the current job losses would be 1.172 with 64 unique vessels fishing in 2010;11. Crew Positions Methods B corrected would be 1,482 jobs lost, and currently would he 2.202 jobs lost in the NP crab fisheries to date. We'd be happy to release the correspondence of ACC & PNCIAC to all those policy - makers and in Congress who are willing to ackoowledae the collusion that wrongly adjusted Table 4 to minimize job losses. The facts are clear, the NPFMC has not collected the best data which does not comply with 16 U.S.C. 1801(c)(3). The best data is available by collecting federally required Lay Share contracts and fully reconcilable settlement sheets, but NOAA/NMFS, and the NPFMC refuse to require them. Our delegation in DC and the state of AK reps should be going after this information, otherwise they are complicit in not gaining the best economic data on the Crab Rationalization program (CR) as well. What more can the crew do? We've asked the NPFMC for 4 years to put a placeholder on the agenda for crew issues with the CR, but not a peep of recognition is given to our request. We've offered multiple crew alternatives since April 2007, then a full suite of alternatives and options in June 2008 in Kodiak, but we've not been asked about our proposals and how they would work to resolve noncompliance with Letter to Arne Fuglvog U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski office April 7, 2011 By Shawn Dochtermann — Crewman's Association National Standard 4 and other equity concerns. Meanwhile, the IFQ holders and ACC and PNCIAC and a new astroturf organization, mostly from Seattle, called the Alaska Bering Sea Crabbers have been allowed monumentally more time on the federal record. The Council has only put forth limited motions (that would do nothing to protect their historical compensation ratios) on the table in the past, but those have all been tabled. Finally in December of 2010 the Council acknowledges there is a problem with unfair and inequitable compensation for crew, after we've spoke to the fact since December 2006. We grant that there was once an ad hoc committee formed to discuss some crew concerns, but it was dominated by the Quota Share holders, and not tasked with bringing back proposed solutions from the Crewmembers. The committee only had two crew positions on it. That committees work should have taken place before the Council itself in full deliberation, but that again is how the Council handles the crew -- by not listening, not recognizing rights to actually change the CR program. Now the Council had relegated the industry (without picking a committee /members) to try to fix the crew inequities, when they industry workout group has no authority to do so officially for either crew or all QS holders. Plus, the supposed industry group is meeting (with no known crewmen present) in Seattle, while the fishery takes place in Alaska. Our organization -- the Crewman's Association -- represents over 170 Bering Sea crabbers and we weren't even informed that Seattle meetings were taking place and there have been no official postings by the Council. May I remind you that Alaska became a state in part to stop the seafood processors and other outside interests from having control of our resources. If they are to occur, we want meetings in Alaska for the actual Alaskan Bering Sea crabbers et al who live in Alaska, and for the community leaders who represent concerns over harms from the CR program against those fishery- dependent communities. Seriously, why should Alaskans have to fly to Seattle, disturbing our natural progression of life, as most of us are engaged in multiple fisheries in Alaskan waters? Why wasn't there ever an official crewman's committee formed to bring solutions to the Council table? The captains had a committee created for them in 2002, so why not crewmen? The obvious answer speaks to Council intent, contrary to its own assurances to Congress, that it will not follow the MSA and consider allocations to crew that are "fair and equitable" as per NS #4 requirements. FYI- Brian Garber - Yontz, an economist for NOAA, pointed out to us that the crab harvest quota shareholders that have no affiliation with a vessel engaged in the crab fisheries are not part of the Economic Data Reporting (EDR), and no form exists for them to report their quota renting and which active vessels fish their leased shares. So that means that the mailbox fisherman who owns no boat, and has only a piece of paper as rights, collects huge rents while assuring that the crewmen and some vessel owners become indentured servants. We're talking about $150 million in missing crew compensations in 6 years, and the coastal communities economies of AK, WA, & OR are being stripped of labor's spending power and how it multiplies regionally, as high rents leave the state into the pockets of these mailbox recipients. To add insult to injury many of the vessel owners/harvest quota share holders are charging crew for the vessel buyback. May I remind you the crew didn't receive any of the benefits of the initial allocation of quota. More to the point, the crew did not own vessels and participate in the vessel reduction plan, and is thus not obligated to pay off loans for those who did. t Letter to Arne Fuglvog U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski office April 7, 2011 By Shawn Dochtermann — Crewman's Association Bob King: We'd like to hear back from you soon as to what Senator Mark Begich intends to do to help us solve the ills of a program that former Gov. Tony Knowles 'pleads guilty' to being part of the problem, wants some steps taken for it to be corrected, and states it need to go to back to a regime that encourage more jobs. As his Press Agent in 2002, we hope that you would take what he says to heart. You acknowledge there is a problem, but we must have assistance to fix it. Cora Campbell: Your position as Commissioner of the ADF &G carries with it the responsibility of protecting and giving assurances to fishermen and the communities that they reside in that they will be treated fair and equitably. Yet we never get any responses back from you. For us to view your role as transparent, your feedback is necessary. So in the future we hope you would respect out requests and engage in dialogue essential to protecting Alaska's fishery dependent communities and participating fishermen, namely the crew. Doug DeMasters: We'd appreciate if you would use your position as NOAA`s head scientist to help remove the roadblocks of gathering the best data in the CR that we have run up against in our quest to gather exact data. Were asking you to correspond with NPFMC members & staff as well as with Director of NMI S, Eric Schwaah, and advise them that hest data collection is imperative for all FMPs. Especially for ones where the majority ownership of harvest quota share was gifted to special interests and that had no useful data collected about the economic distributions. Also we find it very strange that IFQ are being computed as a cost of renting fish instead of a revenue distribution to gifted quotaholders_ The harms to Alaska from high rents cannot be known without the full double -entry accounting and calculations of benefits and costs_ and an examination of where these high rents flow to in the financial world, once they are stripped away from actual fishing operations and communities. How much is subsequently lost in risky financial markets and who really profits from these 'tradeable share' takeaways? Not one dime of which would exist had not the crew and labor component suffered under this giveaway larceny of public domain resources to only a few limited license holders and vessel owners. That is, the entire historical investment of crew labor -- the source of original capital in the crab fisheries -- has been deliberately ignored and crew is being coverted from independent business participants to indentured servitude. What's most disturbing is hearing an aide to a Senator firmly say to a constituent, "there will be no changes ", or roadblocking the public voice by saying, "I'll get back to you IF 1 can." What are you going to do to restore the most basic of Civil Rights -- the right to have rights, and to participatory governance -- given that the NPFMC has clearly decided not to follow the MSA, Lay Share laws, and address crew compensation losses? • r a f k B ering Sea r de Y s y y , ., 5_ 57 s„w , s \ . F ? C re�nr ®r S AA �. j t ,,,,, A J tt3 2007 9:00 -9:15 Mark Fina, Senior Economist Introduction North Pacific Council 9:15 -9:30 Edward Poulsen, Exec Director Overview of the Right of First Offer Alaska Bering Sea Crabbers Proposal and Opportunities for Crew 9:30 -10:00 Don Pease, Loan Officer Introduction to the NMFS Grab NMFS Financial Services Crew Loan Program 10:00 -10:30 Erik Olsen,. Loan Officer Differences Between Private Lending, Farm Credt Sery ices NMFS Lending and Opportunities 10:30 -10:45 Break 10:45 -11:15 Clydina Bailey, Trans Officer Crab QS/IFQ Eligibility Requirements and NMFS RAM Program Quota Share Transfer Process 11:15 -11:45 Jeff Osborn, Broker Overview of Crab IFQ Market and Dock Street Brokers Opportunities for Crew 11:45 -12:00 Tom Active Suryan Skipper /Crew and Tim Mem Henkel Closing Remarks and Next Steps Members 12:00 -1:30 Lunch When: May 3rd, 2011 Where: Leif Erikson Hall Seattle WA Time: 9 am - 1:30 pm Lunch provided by Jim and Mona Stone for all participants Nick, Thanks for your inquiry on solid waste regulations and waste disposal options for the City of Kodiak. The Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC) Solid Waste Program does not permit waste transfer stations or solid waste collection programs. ADEC does have regulations for the accumulation, storage, and treatment of waste (18 AAC 60.010), as well as transport of solid waste (18 AAC 60.015). These regulations may be applicable to the proposed transfer station project on Kodiak Island. Many of the specifics on what the community will allow are done at the local level. I have included a highlighted excerpt of the Solid Waste Regulations (18 AAC 60) applicable to the Kodiak Island transfer station project. 18 AAC 60.010. Accumulation, storage, and treatment. (a) A person may not store accumulated solid waste in a manner that causes (1) a litter violation under 18 AAC 64.015; (2) the attraction or access of domestic animals, wildlife, or disease vectors; (3) a health hazard; or (4) polluted run -off water. (c) A person who has made contractual or other arrangements for the collection, storage, transportation, and treatment of solid waste is not relieved of the responsibility for that waste if the contractor fails to manage the waste in compliance with this section. (f) The owner or operator of a transfer station designed to hold 20 cubic yards or more of waste shall (1) use containers with covers, fencing, or another department- approved method to prevent wind and animals from scattering the waste; (2) pick up litter as necessary to prevent a violation of AS 46.06.080; (3) manage the site so that the standards in 18 AAC 60.230 for disease vectors and animal control are met; and (4) prevent or control run-off that would violate 18 AAC 70. (g) If the department fmds that a transfer station that is not part of a facility holding a permit under this chapter is causing a nuisance or a risk to public health or safety or to the environment, the department will require the operator to submit a facility design and operating plan explaining how the operator will (1) meet the requirements of (f) of this section; (2) conduct operations to prevent a fire at the transfer station; (3) promptly extinguish any fire that occurs; (4) control odor and dust as necessary to prevent a public nuisance; (5) provide safe public access to the facility as necessary; (6) manage hazardous waste abandoned by others at the facility; and (7) prevent or control run -off that would violate 18 AAC 70. (h) Except as provided for drilling waste in 18 AAC 60.430, if the department fmds that a facility used to store more than 50 tons of materials for reuse, recycling, or resource recovery, or more than 50 tons of solid waste before disposal, is causing or contributing to a nuisance or poses a risk to public health, safety, or welfare, or to the environment, the department will require the operator to meet one or more of the following requirements: 1 of 2 (1) provide proof to the department that the landowner has consented to the waste storage activity, unless the operator owns the property; (2) remove the materials from the facility or store materials at the facility for no more than one year; (3) use containers with covers, fencing, or another department- approved method to prevent litter; (4) pick up litter as necessary to prevent a violation of AS 46.06.080; (5) manage the facility so that the standards in 18 AAC 60.230 for disease vectors and animal control are met; (6) prevent fire at the facility; (7) promptly extinguish any fire that occurs; (8) prevent or control run -off that would violate 18 AAC 70; (9) control odors, noise, and dust as necessary to prevent a nuisance; (10) provide safe public access to the facility as necessary; (11) manage hazardous waste abandoned by others at the facility; (12) monitor the temperature of waste piles to detect combustion; and (13) take other appropriate action. 18 AAC 60.015. Transport. (a) A person who transports solid waste shall keep the waste contained during transport. (b) A person who spills solid waste during transport shall promptly pick up the waste and any waste residue resulting from the spill. (Eff. 1/28/96, Register 137) I hope this information helps. Please feel free to call me if you have any further questions. Thanks Doug Doug Huntman, Environmental Program Specialist Department of Environmental Conservation, Solid Waste Program 555 Cordova St., Anchorage, Alaska 99501 (Phone: (907)269 -7642 EFax: (907)269 -7600 * E -Mail: doug.huntmanealaska.aov • ? of 2 698 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICES WERE SENT OUT ON MONDAY, MARCH 14, 2011. BELOW ARE THE RESPONSES RECEIVED BY THE CLERK'S OFFICE. PROPOSED EXPANSION AREA 1A RESIDENTS' NAME RESIDENTS' STREET ADDRESS RESPONSE I BARNARD, BRENDA & DAVID 438 CURLEW WAY OPPOSED ti BARTON, ROBERT & MYRNA 3573A SITKINAK DRIVE OPPOSED 3 COYLE, FRED 3409 TUGIDAK COURT OPPOSED a DIERICH - ERWIN, LIANE 3570 TUGIDAK COURT OPPOSED f FINLAY, DALE 2426 SPRUCE CAPE ROAD OPPOSED b FLERCHINGER, BRITTA 2949 SPRUCE CAPE ROAD, #9 OPPOSED 'I KNOWLES, KEN 3710 SHARATIN ROAD OPPOSED t LINDSEY, LOUIS 3150 SPRUCE CAPE ROAD OPPOSED A MATHIS, ROBERT, JR. 3646 SHARATIN ROAD OPPOSED (0 MILES, FRANK 3618 SHARATIN ROAD OPPOSED 11 ROBERSON, LEONARD 3130 SPRUCE CAPE ROAD OPPOSED 1`L SVINDLAND, GUNNULF 3504 HARLEQUIN COURT OPPOSED - - OPPOSED /* THOMStN, STEVE 498 SHEARWATER DRIVE (CONDITIONALLY) tO WAGNER, ROGER 2987 SPRUCE CAPE ROAD OPPOSED C C WIEST, REBECCA 3560 TUGIDAK COURT OPPOSED (i WOODWARD, WALTER & VICTORIA 2408 SPRUCE CAPE ROAD OPPOSED 1 DRASKOVICH, MARGARET 3511 TUGIDAK COURT SUPPORT is LLEDO, LILIA 3462 PUFFIN DRIVE SUPPORT lot RANDOLPH, MARTHA 3218 KATMAI DRIVE SUPPORT 1,OREPOSA, SUZANNE & LARSEN, JOHN 3231 KATMAI DRIVE SUPPORT p REUTER, MIKE & LISA 3240 KATMAI DRIVE SUPPORT 22- SMITH, STEVEN 2919 SPRUCE CAPE ROAD SUPPORT O$WEST, RED 2474 SPRUCE CAPE ROAD SUPPORT 9 EST, SANDRA 2474 SPRUCE CAPE ROAD SUPPORT c ULLICK, RUSSELL & DEBORAH 331 TEAL WAY SUPPORT A ORTER, SHARON 3247 KATMAI DRIVE NEUTRAL PROPOSED EXPANSION AREA 1B RESIDENTS' NAME RESIDENT'S STREET ADDRESS RESPONSE 77 KOZUB, DONNA 2095 SELIEF LANE OPPOSED 2 4 LONGGOOD, PETER & MELISSA 2133 SELIEF LANE OPPOSED 01 JARIN, SUSANA & PETER 2235 BEAVER LAKE DRIVE SUPPORT 10 ROBERTS, MARGARET 1994 SELIEF LANE SUPPORT 31 SERAME, LANIE 2265 BEAVER LAKE DRIVE SUPPORT PROPOSED EXPANSION AREA 2 32 ARNDT, JOHN 3017 RAVEN CIRCLE OPPOSED . BUNTING, DOUG 3100 PTARMAGIN PASS OPPOSED V V BOURAY, MICHAEL 3291 BALIKA LANE OPPOSED j DILLON, MARCELLA 3438 EIDER STREET OPPOSED alp EMERSON, JAMES 2346 PTARMAGIN PASS OPPOSED 3 ( HELENHOUSE, NENITA 378 NEVA WAY OPPOSED 9 JOHNSON, CRAIG 297 SHAHAFKA WAY OPPOSED , OLSON, CRAIG 725 LILLY DRIVE OPPOSED vim OSTLUND, DAVE 3430 ED'S WAY OPPOSED aV SEATON, LESLIE 2920 COVE DRIVE OPPOSED aka- SMITH, SHEILA 3388 EIDER STREET OPPOSED OPPOSED i t TRACY, DONN 389 NEVA WAY (CONDITIONALLY) t CHATSKI, KELSEY 2939 COVE DRIVE, #B SUPPORT MCLAUGHLIN, BROOKE & KARL 366 NEVA WAY SUPPORT 0, SHERMAN, MIKE & NICOLE 3340 MELNITSA LANE SUPPORT RESPONSES RECEIVED FROM RESIDENTS OUTSIDE THE PROPOSED EXPANSION AREAS CROW, KYLE 410 WEST REZANOF OPPOSED KAPLAN, MARITA 418 LILLY DRIVE OPPOSED LEE, KAREN 4346 CLIFFSIDE ROAD OPPOSED PRUITT. SIDNEY 3328 MONASHKA BAY ROAD OPPOSED (OWEN, MARION 1223 WEST KOUSKOV SUPPORT I Testimony to Kodiak Island Borough Assembly, 07 April 2011 Larry Van Daele PhD Kodiak Area Wildlife Biologist Alaska Department of Fish and Game (907) 486-1876 A couple days ago we convened our tenth annual meeting of public safety staff who routinely deal with bear -human encounters on the Kodiak road system. This group consists of senior local staff from the US Coast Guard, Military Police, Alaska State Troopers, Alaska Wildlife Troopers, Kodiak Police Department, Alaska State Parks, and Alaska Department of Fish and Game. We were also joined by Mr. Koning, Maker, and Vahl from Kodiak Island Borough and Alaska Waste. One of our topics of discussion was the proposed expansion of curb -side garbage pick -up and the location of transfer /collection sites. The consensus of these public safety officials who, along with our staff, are literally on the front lines in dealing with people and bears can be summarized in three points: 1) Any expansion of roll -cart service to outlying areas would infringe on our "defensive perimeter" and reduce our effectiveness to manage bears and protect public safety. If the Borough elects to do this, we recommend bear resistant carts for all households in the expansion area and a contingency plan that includes temporarily curtailing curb -side service and providing alternate bear - resistant means of collection for times and areas where there are problem bears; 2) Further expansion of curb -side service, be it mandatory or voluntary, into the outlaying areas of Monashka and Bells Flats is not advisable and would jeopardize our ability to maintain the delicate balance between co- existing with bears and protecting public safety in those areas; and, 3) Locating a transfer (collection) site at the existing landfill would pose a significant public safety concern due to the nature of the road between Otmeloi and the landfill. It is unlit, has blind spots, is frequented by deer, and is very prone to black ice in the winter, and we anticipate an increase in vehicle accidents as traffic increases. We are also concerned that because it would be inconvenient for most residents, there would be more stock- piling of garbage near homes between trips to the landfill. To minimize this, we recommend a site that is centrally located and minimizes extra trips by residents. Map of 3460 Tona Ln, Kodiak, AK 99615 -6905 Page 1 of 1 • Map of 3460 Tona Ln, Kodiak, AK 99615 -6905 ICiHoO/ yhr3oolt Vic ; S4rys st ( `.10 �� /2 ' „.,, �i� � nC `Ono , � Q a ` Curlew: Ni y YT \ AU i �� ' - }{at}equi02 11 • =-teal Way li • on I *Iry 1 i --1.(, " i x . /' ° `\ add 11 s � 1 J1. F477 421 C' KodAak .F,' i orplr VJay: - : 1 i Wi is) , I. 4 • ar %• ; a� � r Q om r J' . � o a a e a � � D� n� et 35' / / ' s+ L r a ay AOda-Way"+ a r; ' m+ ,21 \\ ;/' z4/ to 41r , '`., . F 1 a F(if � r• i h{ra, v #y / t l am ` ' 1.. . • II aO - f(h n a it . 41 a . a � 64 w t fr of _C -' " I f t t , 5 vt , , v , it .; t4 250 mom; 1 " i ti d ^ �} t v r 4. e �i j 'j� , e , t 5 , , , o 11 Y i s - ffi b'r..3 When using any driving directions or map, it's a good Idea to do a reality check and make sure the road still exists, watch out for construction, and follow all traffic safety precautions. This is only to be used, as an aid in planning. http: / /maps. yahoo .eom/ print ?mvt= m &ioride= us &tp =1 &stx= &feat= &frat= &cIat= 57.808262... 4/7/2011 �.� t — � i 4� 1� '(.D , nr : ur� agc 1 H 2 2 ) ■ 2 - v - - ( .., „ y : N� c - � ,/N O 7� r Y. ,.�.”. � E5R? S ' Ppu r t Cf1��[c� /{ci '� Kodiak Island Borough �� �� � / � : . { �q\r s<a`` 't7 . r J ` •a' r : ,5. a '' y , a se , � /y`^ J Y �.�. 1 . "�. ��ca i. • t St �fa9 Y ? !; 1 'W `w i �rj' �q tents r ; ! 0 : (•` ` y, , 1 ' r ` c k � r^ 1 +.34 , • f / � , J" i t p S.ig y *J . Y .C- ,;syy ? / t 4 # ,t-4. ,. X.a '� p ly [ . � � r. s. • r : y ' . . Water FE ia. ` ' +- -2c £3 ~ .k " ' ' ""� . J '', Labels I1 “-.. ,, le t� � mac` ° , 1 .7 a , � k '° �� ` y, l C� ' . I.; Streets -v te ;iv. '?"1 z \s f I x " , . . . _ , r) si—, :... 4. • f� tle. L' ry • A' T �1iC•f� - �./: Parcels 1 R r f� _ ,' 't �.' y ,. 4 _ e• ,. PL55 t s '_ W v7 I t.'1... 4 5 . 3 l� r f j - 'J''� Background Imd i `': �"'p ¢-� ��' ' _�` a.. p �,�,�. "� 4 � � . y� • frn t ' ��� ; . 4• Y as 0. Gin Imagery .. a � , r1 ,41-',1.1'.-f- •` $ ft I Imagery 1 av o. t .t r , K - • t '� ' ` ''t F° r �: w e_ .4m Imagery 3-t � ' t '. � ` ' rti � r >r� � � - r � r 3c .Sm Imagery 1 } .Fe _ x • �. _s r .r r� ! ,r iL e / v y$` f *� . lm Imagery .c T /1A i`g s. 4 - ry .__ Shapes <'• a'� F y alCC z• 3a !'"g _ Z-. f yy -.per.- V . �d'1''� 9' Y ie f I Y } i•- S 5� tttt it i .. `° . 4- �, -Y .1. t 4r ::_ Nh. 3" F ." • i As o- . ,:n- `n • >1 )- - t6 ) 0 \ 'A \--;,. '-' c ur-0 , J Testimony to Kodiak Island Borough Assembly, 07 April 2011 Larry Van Daele PhD Kodiak Area Wildlife Biologist Alaska Department of Fish and Game (907) 486-1876 A couple days ago we convened our tenth annual meeting of public safety staff who routinely deal with bear -human encounters on the Kodiak road system. This group consists of senior local staff from the US Coast Guard, Military Police, Alaska State Troopers, Alaska Wildlife Troopers, Kodiak Police Department, Alaska State Parks, and Alaska Department of Fish and Game. We were also joined by Mr. Koning, Maker, and Vahl from Kodiak Island Borough and Alaska Waste. One of our topics of discussion was the proposed expansion of curb -side garbage pick -up and the location of transfer /collection sites. The consensus of these public safety officials who, along with our staff, are literally on the front lines in dealing with people and bears can be summarized in three points: 1) Any expansion of roll -cart service to outlying areas would infringe on our "defensive perimeter" and reduce our effectiveness to manage bears and protect public safety. If the Borough elects to do this, we recommend bear resistant carts for all households in the expansion area and a contingency plan that includes temporarily curtailing curb -side service and providing alternate bear- resistant means of collection for times and areas where there are problem bears; 2) Further expansion of curb -side service, be it mandatory or voluntary, into the outlaying areas of Monashka and Bells Flats is not advisable and would jeopardize our ability to maintain the delicate balance between co- existing with bears and protecting public safety in those areas; and, 3) Locating a transfer (collection) site at the existing landfill would pose a significant public safety concern due to the nature of the road between Otmeloi and the landfill. It is unlit, has blind spots, is frequented by deer, and is very prone to black ice in the winter, and we anticipate an increase in vehicle accidents as traffic increases. We are also concerned that because it would be inconvenient for most residents, there would be more stock- piling of garbage near homes between trips to the landfill. To minimize this, we recommend a site that is centrally located and minimizes extra trips by residents. gfi My name is Kate Ballenger and I am a 44 year resident of Kodiak. I wish to speak against your proposed plan to start garbage pick up in my neighborhood. Many years ago I had a house on Thorsheim and we had garbage pick up and even at that time — when I was years younger — it was a real hassle to pull the can out on garbage day and then return later in the day hoping to find the empty can still somewhere accessible. In 1990 when I married I moved to Shahafka Circle and there have used the dumpster. There have been times when it was difficult for me to open the top to dump my garbage; however, it is totally beyond comprehension for me to envision myself pulling a garbage can down my long driveway to have it available for pick up on a designated day. In the summer it would be a chore but in the winter it would be unfathomable. That along with the high winds we encounter in Kodiak to play hide and seek with the garbage cans just makes absolutely no sense to me. When all these issues came out I thought everybody was talking about going at this a bit slower than you have now decided and to me it is very unfair of you as elected officials to decide what we want without listening to our concerns. The article in the newspaper the other night made it sound like a slam dunk that we would be forced into this new practice no matter what we wanted. 1 went up and down my block and found absolutely no one who wanted this service. I have here a list of individuals who signed my petition that merely stated they do not want the garbage pick up. We do have the occasional bear in our neighborhood and I don't think we want to tempt any additional critters in to hurt our children or in my case, my dog Molly. Please do not cram this down our throats. THE UNDERSIGNED ARE OPPOSED TO PROCEEDING WITH THE ALASKA WASTE PROPOSED ROLL CART SERVICES IN OUR AREA. NAME RESIDENCE ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS kon Fried (Tnyr;) PO » »Y 8585 ra, Fried Lf S3 Shahalka Po r5DX 05 95 awn t77 Ski P6 2607 AIL\ 354CtA Skdfi-CL. (e-Cc CAr kipol A& 9% loy �� J ( 33D Sk L Pica C,- koc; 4k 29‘75 M tK t, Gtc itZp S k • ec ;c b niC--5(9 THE UNDERSIGNED ARE OPPOSED TO PROCEEDING WITH THE ALASKA WASTE PROPOSED ROLL CART SERVICES IN OUR AREA. NAME RESIDENCE ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS /a_ .■ , ./l/e - _ . . ' , //_// ' / . _,/ 1 / 42 Ln2. efe ' _ A 2/ .359 U e ed-LL tsi Aes no ceut 'vat lebgit iek. T .n.N2lrc�v.A _) t_34. NtP.i....(on 5 1 ( / , 21 Z,s- p6vd„,, ,.,,,A J, � o X' gill (4 Le- 1 t- - - ■ 1 Lav,S,,,\0&,(1 hilikLIZ