2009-06-11 Work SessionKodiak Island Borough
Assembly Work Session
Thursday, June 11, 2009, 7:30 p.m., Borough Conference Room
Work Sessions are informal meetings of the Assembly where Assembly members review the upcoming regular meeting agenda
packet and seek or receive information from staff. Although additional items not listed on the work session agenda are discussed
when introduced by the Mayor, Assembly, or staff, no formal action is taken at work sessions and items that require formal
Assembly action are placed on regular Assembly meeting agenda. Citizen's comments at work sessions are NOT considered part of
the official record. Citizen's comments intended for the "official record" should be made at a regular Assembly meeting.
CITIZENS' COMMENTS (Limited to Three Minutes per Speaker)
AGENDA ITEMS:
1. Gulf of Alaska LLP Cod Endorsement Recency - Letter to Secretary of Commerce
2. Borough /School District Renewal and Replacement Projects — Possible Funding Options
3. Green House Model in Seward — Facility Tour
PACKET REVIEW
PUBLIC HEARING
Ordinance No. FY2009 -01 E Amending Ordinance No. FY2009 -01 Fiscal Year 2009 Budget by
Amending Budgets to Account for Various Revenues that are Over Budget, Provide for
Additional Expenditures, Budget New Projects, and Move Funds Between Projects.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS - None
NEW BUSINESS
CONTRACTS - None
RESOLUTIONS
Resolution No. FY2009 -34 Authorizing the Records Manager to Dispose of Certain Kodiak
Island Borough Records.
ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION - None
OTHER ITEMS - None
MANAGER'S COMMENTS
CLERK'S COMMENTS
MAYOR'S COMMENTS
ASSEMBLY MEMBERS COMMENTS
-from LL2
DRAFT....DRAFT.... DRAFT....DRAFT.... DRAFT....DRAFT.... DRAFT....DRAFT
May 28, 2009
Honorable Gary Locke, U.S.
Washington, D.C.
Dear Mr. Secretary,
Secretary of CommerctoDLAK ISLAND BOROUGH
CLERK'S OFFICE �;
LIED TO:
ASSEMBLY MAYOR.
MANAGER_ OTHER_
We elected officials serving on the Kodiak Island Borough Assem
concerned that the Gulf of Alaska cod fishery permit reduction program proposed by the
North Pacific Fishery Management Council (NPFMC) will result in economic harm to
Kodiak and other coastal communities in the Central and Western Gulf of Alaska. We are
writing you today to explain our concerns and seek your help.
We understand that the NPFMC has recommended that you, Mr. Secretary, sign
into law the Limited License Permit (LLP) Cod Recency program, which would
permanently remove 790 permits from the fixed (pot and longline) gear cod fishery in the
Gulf of Alaska (GOA). We also understand that many Kodiak residents who are
stakeholders on both sides of the issue have long been engaged in the tedious Council
process involving the LLP cod permit reduction program. However, it is not the interest
of the Kodiak Island Borough Assembly who among the stakeholders benefits from this
proposal. Our concern is this: the proposed permit reduction program substantially
reduces access to the cod fishery by permanently removing 70% of the fixed gear cod
permits in the Gulf of Alaska without a thorough socio- economic analysis of the impacts
on the future of Kodiak and its coastal neighbors. Therefore, we ask that you refrain from
signing the LLP Cod Endorsement Recency program into law unless an independent
socio- economic study demonstrates that this permit reduction proposal will not
negatively impact Kodiak and the coastal communities in the Central and Western Gulf
of Alaska.
As you know, Kodiak is a major economic hub in the North Pacific and has been
for hundreds of years. Kodiak, which consistently ranks among the top three fishing ports
in the nation, is homeport to the largest and most diversified fishing fleet in the U.S. It is
a key player in the commercial fishing industry, which is the largest private sector
employer in the State of Alaska.
The Gulf of Alaska cod fishery is an essential part of our region's robust fisheries
and is vital to the economy of Kodiak and our coastal neighbors. Currently, the fixed gear
cod fishery includes 1,147 permits. The federal fixed gear cod fishery in the Gulf of
Alaska already has been rationalized: It is a limited entry fishery, currently open to the
1,147 fishermen who hold cod permits. The LLP permit reduction proposal would further
limit entry to the cod fishery by giving 360 permit holders the right to fish cod with fixed
gear in the federal waters of the Gulf of Alaska. Limiting access to the cod fishery to this
degree is of great concern to us because it may not be in the best interest of the Kodiak
community and its coastal neighbors.
Of the nearly 790 fishermen who would lose access to the cod fishery under the
proposal, 600 are active in other GOA fisheries and often harvest several species to
balance their fishing operations. Under the permit reduction proposal, these 600
MAY 2 7 2009
fishermen, as well as future generations of Kodiak fishermen, would need to purchase an
LLP cod permit from the small pool of 360 permits that would remain in the LLP fixed
gear cod fishery as proposed.
Like most businesses, most commercial vessels fishing out of Kodiak and other
coastal communities regularly adapt to a changing marketplace by diversifying -- in this
case, by harvesting -- more than one species of fish throughout the year. Permanently
removing 70% of the cod permits from the Gulf of Alaska cod fishery begs the question:
How would this affect fishermen needing to diversify their business, and how would this
ultimately affect the economies of Kodiak and coastal communities in the Central and
Western Gulf of Alaska?
The sheer number of permits that would be removed from the cod fishery under
the LLP proposal would significantly reduce future fishing opportunities in our back
yard. This gives us pause. Could substantially less access to the cod fishery result in less
boats gearing up for the season, less boats delivering their catches to fish processing
plants in Kodiak, and less boats providing fishing opportunities for young people wanting
to participate in the industry that is the mainstay of our economy? Could the proposed
removal of permits result in an out - migration of Kodiak residents? Could less access to
the cod fishery make it significantly more difficult for Kodiak fishermen to diversify their
fishing business and more difficult for the future fishermen of Kodiak and the coastal
communities of the Central and Western Gulf of Alaska to make a living at sea? We as
policy makers for Kodiak Island do not know the answers to these questions and are
concerned that haste in moving this program forward will damage the economic viability
of our community. Thus, it is our responsibility to seek answers to questions concerning
the socio- economic impacts of this permit reduction proposal.
As you know, Mr. Secretary, this proposal did not arise from an existing
biological crisis in the cod fishery. We believe, then, that careful consideration should be
given to Kodiak, a major fishing port, and its neighboring coastal communities before
signing into law a fisheries program of such magnitude as this cod permit reduction
proposal. Therefore, we respectfully urge you to ignore the sense of urgency and
emotional rhetoric that typically surrounds fishing allocation issues such as this one and,
instead, make sure the time is taken to study the full impact of the LLP permit reduction
proposal on Kodiak and the coastal communities of the Central and Western Gulf of
Alaska.
We ask you to seek answers on our behalf, Mr. Secretary, by sending this LLP
proposal back to the NPFMC for a socio- economic impact study before it is adopted. In
doing so, we will we be assured that the Department of Commerce has done its best to
ensure Kodiak and the coastal communities of the Central and Western Gulf of Alaska
remain vibrant, healthy, prosperous fishing communities.
Thank you for your consideration,
Sincerely,
KIB
Jessica Kilborn
Subject: FW: Draft Letter
Original Message
From: jnifulp @gci.net [mailto:jnifulp @gci.net]
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 2:07 PM
To: Nova Javier
Cc: Rick Gifford
Subject: Draft Letter
"I would like to see the letter one page with three points and simple to the point. I would rather use
percentage than numbers, over two- thirds of the LLP holders have been denied a Pacific Cod endorsement.
Also, I would like the letter to emphasize the way this issue has polarized our community based on whether
you qualified or did not qualify to fish Pacific Cod with the new proposed regulations.
Finally, the fact that Kodiak's youth are not going to have a fishing future with these new regultions, because
of the huge buy in costs to get started (permit, gear and boat).
Judy
Sent from my iPhone
KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH
CLERK'S OFFICE
COP TO:
ASSENII41 i` MAYO
MANAfitit _, " OTHER
Please add these comments to the testimony about Sue's draft letter to the Secretary of Commerce from the
Assembly. Thanks!
1
r
JUN - 3 2009
Public Comment of: Walter F. Sargent, Jr.
F/V Major
Kodiak, AK 99615
192nd Plenary Session
North Pacific Fishery Management Council
April 1 — April 7, 2009
Hilton Hotel — Anchorage, Alaska
For the Official Record
Mr. Secretary, Chairman Olson & NPFMC Council Members:
RE: C - 1 GOA Groundfish Management — Revision of License Limitation Program
Final action: Fixed Gear recency to add P.Cod endorsement to WGOA & CGOA licenses.
My name is Walter Sargent of Kodiak, and I have been fishing in the Gulf of Alaska since before
statehood. I hold LLPs for Southeastern Outside, GOA, and the Western GOA.
I am opposed to the removal of LLPs and to the implementation of P.Cod endorsement
requirements.
In some areas, I've held LLPs since their inception and in other areas have purchased them. Like
all of my licenses for fishing privileges, I consider my LLPs to be part of my legacy in Alaskan
fisheries. When earned or purchased, an LLP is an investment backed by sound business
reasoning — and it is absurd to have them arbitrarily removed by the Council. Fishermen need the
operational options that they provide, in order to move from area -to -area according to operating
and seasonal schedules.
To have these privileges deliberately removed or restricted in order to create more super -
concentrated, privatized and tradable assets will simply make for more of the same economic
hindrances and problems of other irrational management schemes this Council has already erred in
creating.
So far, it is clear that the continued consolidation of our fisheries has not been good for coastal
communities like King Cove, Sand Point, and even Dutch Harbor — where many small businesses
have closed. Further consolidation will be no different in the harms it will bring to GOA
communities. And no different in the fact that it only hurts Alaska — because more consolidation
will mean more revenue flight, as there is no reason GOA privatization will be any different.
Individual fishermen already share a responsibility for the resource, and they do not need to be
privatized to make good stewardship and management possible. Just because a person has fished
one area for a long time is not a reason for an assignment of ownership rights – it still remains a
privilege only. And that is a privilege which must be maintained for future generations, along
with the ability for fishermen to become more innovative and efficient of their own choice.
Contrary to those goals, the Purpose and Need Statement clearly states "the intent of the proposed
amendment is to prevent the future entry or re -entry of latent fixed gear groundfish capacity that
has not been utilized in recent years into the Pacific cod fisheries, and to preserve the traditional
vessel operational efficiencies within the fisheries."
Likewise, that flawed and unsound Purpose and Need statement alludes to increased market value
and intense competition. The Council is fully aware of dropping prices; and may I ask, "What is
wrong with good old fashioned competition ?"
I wholly disagree that "the possible future entry of latent effort and disproportionate vessel
efficiency would have detrimental effects on LLP holders." As a long -term participant, I do not
"need protection from those who have little or no recent history." As a long -term fishing business
manager, I also do not need regulatory theories about how to attain efficiency forced upon my
operations.
Don't be fooled. Fewer options are not good for management or for free and open markets. And
processor linkages are certain to be coming along with this. There are already enough hindrances
to good business practices and too few opportunities. Alaskans need no more privatization of the
Public Commons.
Again, I oppose the removal of LLPs and this new ploy of requiring P.Cod endorsements as a
means of attaining the same harmful consolidation.
Waiter F. Sargent, Jr.
Submitted by fax to NPFMC: 907 - 271 -2817 — Tuesday, March 24, 2009 2:15 p.m.
Jessica Kilborn
From: Nova Javier
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 3:38 PM
To: Rick Gifford
Subject: FW: Letter on LLP Recency
We totally oppose the political bodies getting involved in this matter.
1
■i.ODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH
CLERK'S PEKE
COPI TO:
ASSEMBLY MAYOR
MANAGER OTHER
MAY 2 1 2009
From: pomega @gci.net [mailto:pomega @gci.net]
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 4:02 PM
To: pat.branson @assembly.kodiakak.us; jerrol .friend @assembly.kodiakak.us; judy.fulp @assembly.kodiakak.us;
sue.jeffrey @assembly.kodiakak.us; david.kaplan @assembly.kodiakak.us; chris .lynch @assembly.kodiakak.us;
louise .stutes @assembly.kodiakak.us; Nova Javier
Subject: Letter on LLP Recency
My name is Chris Holland. My husband Ken and I own and operate our 72ft fishing vessel POINT OMEGA exclusively out
of Kodiak. We live in Kodiak and our fish come across the docks here and the borough collects fish tax on our deliveries.
We live in Kodiak and our kids and their kids as well as our crew lives in Kodiak. We do our shipyard work here and we
use the businesses in town to maintain and keep our operation afloat. We are totally dependent on our fishing efforts for
one hundred percent of our income.
It has come to our attention that while we were away on a fishing trip the Borough Assembly has brought up a joint City /
Borough letter being written to the Secretary of Commerce about the recent action at the council that took on fixed gear
LLP recency.
We have been fishing cod with pots out of Kodiak since 1987; this fishery makes up about a third of our yearly fishing
income.
This year the Federal "A" season was just about as short as anytime in our history of cod fishing. We figured that the
average gross for a cod pot boat this year was about $37,000 and that is approximately $2100.00 for a crewman. Since
the cod season was short and we also had a short State water cod fishery that meant our next fishery wasn't until mid
March when we could do IFQ halibut and I don't know about you but when your paycheck is only a couple of thousand
bucks and it has to last you for several months you might find yourself way behind on the rent by the time you get back to
fishing. The price was down and the effort was up and it was not a good combination during unsettled times.
We have been going to the NPFMC meeting for the lasts several years because of the problems we have been seeing in
the cod fishery around Kodiak. We needed to have some sort of stabilization in this fishery that we have long term
dependence on. Finally we have a sort of compromise position that will reduce the number of LLP's in the GOA fishery. It
sounds like a big reduction when you use the numbers in your bullet point letter (1,147 boats down to 360 boats) but you
need to consider that this is not a rationalization like what happened in the Bering Sea where 250 boats actually fished
and there are only maybe 90 left. Here the boats aren't going away unless they are already gone; they are just doing
other things and have no dependence on cod. Of the 360 boats that are left only about a third of them participate and a
goodly number of those only started when they heard that there was a chance that they might not get an endorsement.
There are still way more permits than the fishery can handle.
For people like us who are dependent on cod this is a blow to our income and if you promote leaving this a wide open
entry fishery because you some how think it is a social injustice, then you are really saying lets just destabilize this fishery
until the people who are dependent on it can go broke with everyone else and your tax base is not going to look so good
around here.
If you are asking for another costly study to be done then I wonder who's pocket you are planning to take it out of as ours
is being tapped pretty heavily already and in a down turn in the economy like we are in right now I don't think we can
afford it. If you do have a study done then it needs to be carefully thought through so that we get meaningful information
and not just guesstimates out of it.
. J.
Please don't get in the middle of a fisheries fight or muddy up the waters for those of us who have had to spend our own
money and time to try and keep our business in Kodiak viable during these changing times.
I might add that you have the KFAC group and if they can't come to a consensus then maybe it isn't a matter for the
borough. There is a 129 page document that the NPFMC has on this issue and probably unless you have time for all your
members to read and understand this issue it might not be fair for you to get into it.
Thanks for taking the time to listen to our concerns and for taking on the unenviable position of being an elected official.
2
May 28, 2009
Dear Members of the Borough Assembly:
KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH
CLERK'S FFICE
COP D TO:
ASSEMBLY MAYOR
MANAGER OTHER
MAY 2 8 2009
I'm sorry that a prior commitment will keep me from attending the meeting tonight.
Although I was raised in Kodiak and visited yearly since moving away, three years ago I
began spending half my time here. I was shocked and horrified when I realized how
Kodiak's economy has faltered, and learned of the loss of jobs due to privatization of the
industry. I simply did not understand how the town could allow this to happen.
Because I live in SE Alaska the other half of the year, I have watched how other
communities deal with hot button issues. It isn't ever easy, yet if a town chooses to stand
up for the cause that does the greatest good for the greatest number of people, that is the
best you can do. Imagine if one day processors decided to ship their fish to Sand Point
plants for processing. Perhaps they were going to save a lot of money by consolidating
their plants. Wouldn't the town speak up and protest the loss of jobs for our cannery
workers? Wouldn't we be appalled and concerned and fight to keep their jobs here?
Yet our city leaders only wrote a letter with weak caveats when rationalization first
reared its ugly head. Perhaps they thought the issue was "too complicated" and it was
easier to let the lobbyists break down the issues more simply. Unfortunately the people
who stood to benefit the most are those who have the money to hire lobbyists, and buy
the plane tickets and hotel rooms to attend week long NPFMC meetings. No matter what
those same individuals may tell you, there is a growing body of research proving that
rationalization is a lazy form of fisheries management with steep economic casualties for
coastal communities. (See "Enclosing the Fisheries: People, Places & Power" by
Carothers and Lowe.)
I would like to strongly encourage each of you to read the attached paper by Dr. Bromley.
Although it may be difficult academic reading in some places, ii a" m a lc
challenged person (such as me) can digest it, I'm sure you can as well. I urge you to pu
a stop to the continuance of irrational fisheries management, and correct the wrongs that
happened in the past.
Sincerely,
Kristine Harder
Box 1706
1124 E. Rezanof
Kodiak, AK 99615
486- 3448/723 -8095
?4_,66
Skave e Al
Vt • 5
Jerome Selby, Mayor, Kodiak Island Borough
Members, Kodiak Island Borough Assembly
Dear Mayor Selby and Members of the Assembly,
United Fishermen's Marketing Association, Inc.
PO Box 2917, Kodiak, AK 99615
Tel: 907 - 486 -3453; fax: 907 - 486 -8364
May 28, 2009
Page 1 of 3
KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH
CLE OFFICE
CO IED TO:
ASSEMBLY MAYOR
14 LINAGER OTHER
Re: Letter Proposed By MB Assembly Member Susan Jeffrey To U.S. Secretary of Commerce
On The April 2009 NPFMC Action on GOA Fixed Gear Recency Endorsements
We respectfully submit the following comments as you consider the letter that has been proposed by
KIB Assembly member Susan Jeffrey to be sent to the U.S. Secretary of Commerce (Secretary)
objecting to the recent April 2004 action by the North Pacific Fishery Management Council
(Council) recommending the implementation of "Endorsements" in the Gulf of Alaska (GOA) fixed
gear p. cod fisheries ( "GOA Fixed Gear Endorsements ").
The motion that the Council adopted on this issue ( "April 3, 2009- Anchorage, Alaska
North Pacific Fishery Management Council Motion- Final Action ") is found at
<http: / /www. fakr.noaa.gov /npfmc /current_ issues / pcod /FixedGearRecencyMotion409.pdfl.
The documentation that largely provided the Council with a compilation and analysis of the data and
the social and economic issues and impacts of the Altematives and Options that were available to the
Council to address the significant problems that exist in the GOA fixed gear p. cod fishery is entitled
"PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/REGULATORY IMPACT
REVIEW/INITIAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS for a Proposed Amendment to the
Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the GOA Management Area to ADD PACIFIC COD
ENDORSEMENTS TO WESTERN AND CENTRAL GOA FIXED GEAR LLP; March 3, 2009"
( "EA/RIR/IRFA ", 129 pages), and is found at
<http: / /www.fakr.noaa.gov /npfmc /current issues /pcod/fixedgearrecency309.pdf >.
The subject Council action is based on complex and multidimensional informational and analytical
elements that are complex, intricate, data - intense and difficult. We respectfully recommend, prior to
taking action on the letter that is proposed by Assembly member Jeffrey, that it is essential for
Assembly members to have made a sincere and thorough effort to review and understand the details
of the Council action on GOA Fixed Gear Endorsements, including the actual elements of the
Motion that the Council adopted on this issue, the associated EA/RIR/IRFA, and the other analytical
and data intense informational background of such action.
We would like to point out a few reference points that form the basis of our perspectives on the
recent Council action on GOA Fixed Gear Endorsements:
1. The License Limitation Permits (LLPs) that were the subject of the recent Council action were
determined and effectively awarded in 1995. These LLPs were based on (1) a General Qualification
Period (GQP) that reached back to 1988 history (21 years ago), (2) an Endorsement Qualification
Period (EQP) that reached back to 1992 (17 years ago), and (3) minimal qualification and landings
criteria. Therefore, the LLPs that were the subject of the recent April 2009 Council action were
600Z 8 Z �d W
based on Council action in 1995, and were created as a result of history that essentially occurred
between 21 and 19 years ago. The subject Council action used this pool of LLPs to establish
qualification criteria that is generally similar to qualification criteria that is used to establish License
Limitation (i.e., Limited Entry Permits) in the Alaska salmon, crab, herring and other fisheries. The
GOA p. cod fishery has been operating under the LLP management regime for 9 years.
2. There were approximately 883 fixed gear catcher vessel LLPs issued for the Central GOA
(CGOA). 702 of these CGOA LLPs were issues for use on vessels <60 LOA.
3. The 10 metric ton (mt) "threshold" that the Council adopted for <60' vessels requires that a <60'
vessel must have delivered approximately 22,040 pounds over a 7 year period; this amounts to an
approximate average landing of 3,149 lbs. per year over a 7 year period. At a theoretical average
price per pound of $.35 per pound, the approximate value of 22,040 lbs over a 7 -year period is
$7,714.00, or, an approximate average value of $1,102.00 per year over a 7 -year period. We believe,
given the circumstances that exist in the CGOA fixed gear p. cod fishery, that an approximate
average annual catch of 3,149 lbs. per year over a 7 year period, or an approximate average annual
landed value of $1,102.00 per year over a 7 year period, is a lenient and reasonable threshold.
4. The 50 metric ton (mt) "threshold" that the Council adopted for >60' vessels requires that a >60'
vessel must have delivered approximately 110,200 pounds over a 7 year period; this amounts to an
approximate average landing of 15,743 lbs. per year over a 7 year period. At a theoretical average
price per pound of $.35 per pound, the approximate value of 110,200 lbs over a 7 -year period is
$38,570.00, or, an approximate average annual value of $5,510.00 per year over a 7 -year period. We
believe, given the circumstances that exist in the CGOA fixed gear p. cod fishery, that an
approximate average annual catch of 15,743 lbs. per year over a 7 year period, or an approximate
average annual landed value of $5,510.00 per year over a 7 year period, is a lenient and reasonable
threshold.
5. 25% of the entire federal Total Allowable Catch (TAC) is reserved for a "State Waters Fishery"
that is available only to jig gear and pot gear (the "State Waters Fishery" harvest occurs within State
of Alaska waters, and is exclusively managed by the State of Alaska; the harvest that occurs in the
"State Waters Fishery" is different from, and in addition to, the harvest that occurs in the "Parallel
Waters Federal Fishery", and the harvest that occurs in the "Federal Waters Federal Fishery").
6. A significant portion of the 75% of the federal TAC that is not reserved for the "State Waters
Fishery" is taken in the "Parallel Waters Federal Fishery" (the "Parallel Waters Federal Fishery"
occurs within State of Alaska Waters during the "Federal Fishery"; the harvest that occurs in the
"Parallel Waters Federal Fishery" is different from, and in addition to, the harvest that occurs within
State of Alaska Waters during the "State Waters Fishery", and the harvest that occurs in the "Federal
Waters Federal Fishery").
7. Harvesters who wish to harvest GOA p. cod with fixed gear in the "State Waters Fishery" and in
the "Parallel Waters Federal Fishery" are not restricted from doing so by the subject Council action.
The "State Waters Fishery" and the "Parallel Waters Federal Fishery" represent a significant quantity
of p. cod that is available to harvesters who do not meet the minimal and reasonable qualification
criteria that were established by the subject Council action.
8. Harvesters who wish to harvest GOA p. cod with jig gear in the "State Waters Fishery", in the
"Parallel Waters Federal Fishery" and in the "Federal Waters Federal Fishery" are not restricted at
Page 2 of 3
1
all from doing so by the subject Council action, and are exempt from the minimal and reasonable
qualification criteria that were established by the subject Council action.
9. Increasing the pool of LLPs in the GOA fixed gear p. cod fishery does not guarantee that more
Kodiak harvesters will participate in this fishery. In fact, Kodiak harvesters are likely to continue to
be disadvantaged and displaced by non - Kodiak harvesters if the Council action is delayed.
The EA/RIR/IRFA for the Council action on GOA Fixed Gear Endorsements was required by the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and other federal law. The EA/RIR/IRFA for the
subject action represents a respectable quality work product and analysis that largely identifies the
broad and diverse range of social, cultural and economic impacts, effects, considerations and issues
that are central and relevant to the Council action on GOA Fixed Gear Endorsements. This
document has undergone intense scrutiny from the public, federal agencies, state agencies,
stakeholders and others during the years that it has been under development.
It would be helpful for the Assembly to point out any errors, discrepancies or shortcomings that you
may identify in the social and economic analyses, in the data, in the Alternatives and Options that
were available to the Council, or in other elements of the subject EA/RIR/IRFA.
We understand and respect that members of the public may not agree with the Council decision on
GOA Fixed Gear Endorsements. We further understand and respect that the Assembly may choose
to submit comments in opposition to, or in support of, any Council action. While we do not
necessarily agree with all elements of the subject Council action on GOA Fixed Gear Endorsements,
on balance, we conclude that such action is (1) justified, warranted and reasonable, and (2) supported
by (a) the economic and social analyses that formed the basis of the subject Council action, (b) the
circumstances that have been developing over many years, that are currently evident, and that
portend to worsen in the GOA fixed gear p. cod fishery, (c) the obvious, proven and ongoing
degradation of the economic, social and cultural underpinnings and stability of Kodiak and other
Alaskan coastal community residents, fishermen, stakeholders, support businesses and others as a
result of such circumstances, (d) the proven absence of other reasonable or realistic solutions to
address such circumstances, and (e) the public testimony that has been submitted to the Council in
past years on this matter.
We respect and appreciate the concern, sincerity and intentions of Assembly member Susan Jeffrey
with respect to the letter and associated list of issues that she has proposed. Nevertheless, we
respectfully submit that a letter to the Secretary that follows the arguments that have been proposed
by Assembly member Jeffrey is not in the best interest of the Kodiak community, the economic,
social and cultural underpinnings and stability of Kodiak, the Kodiak citizenry, or the fishermen,
processing sector employees, stakeholders, support businesses and others that rely on a healthy
fishery, and, specifically, on a healthy Kodiak based fixed gear p. cod fleet.
Thank you for your consideration of our comments with respect to this issue.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey R. Stephan
Page 3 of 3
Nova Javier
From: Rick Gifford
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 2:48 PM
To: Nova Javier
Subject: FW:
FYI
Rick Gifford
Borough Manager
Kodiak Island Borough
710 Mill Bay Road
Kodiak, AK 99615
Phone: 907 - 486 -9301
Fax: 907 - 486 -9374
Email: rRifford(kodiakak.us
Web site: http: / /www.kodiakak.us
PUBLIC RECORDS LAW DISCLOSURE: This e-mail and responses to this e-mail are subject to
provisions of the Alaska Statutes and may be made available to the public upon request.
Original Message
From: Jerry Bongen [mailto:jbongen@mac.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 2:23 PM
To: scokinc @ak.net; jnifulp @gci.net; krd @ak.net; jfriend @alaska.com;
chrislynch @acsalaska.net; jerome.selby @assembly.kodiakak.us
Cc: Rick Gifford
Subject:
All,
I have a correction to make on bullet #5. The number of pot endorsed licenses generated by
the Cod Recency Action is an approximate increase of 100% or double the the number of active
participants.
Sorry for the mistake.
Jerry Bongen
Jessica Kilborn
Subject:
From: Jerry Bongen [mailto:jbongen @mac.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 8:44 AM
To: scokinc @ak.net; jnifulp @gci.net; chrislynch @acsalaska.net; jerome.selby @assembly.kodiakak.us; Rick Gifford
Subject:
All,
If you have any concerns, comments, or questions, please contact me.
Jerry Bongen
907 - 486 -6245 hm
702 - 308 -1654 cell
FW: Please make pap&
�' - tGER .
a1HA1K ISLAND BOROUGH
CLERK'S OFFICE
COPIE W:
MAYOR
OTHER
City and Borough Letter to Secretary of Commerce
1. Letter to Secretary of Commerce was not vetted thru KFAC. Many active participants in
cod fishery are not aware of City and Borough intent to send a letter to Secretary of
Commerce.
2. No specifics on what City and Borough want analyzed. Cod Recency Action analysis
contains economic analysis of the Action. The analysis does an extensive social /
economic review of the KIB villages which resulted in 21 CGOA licenses being
allocated to KIB villages. City of Kodiak residents will receive more fixed gear licenses
endorsements than any other community in the GOA.
3. 2009 "A" season average pot boat gross $42,000, average crew share $2,300. Cod
fishery lasted 27 days.
4. Action does not consolidate # of active participants. Like salmon and herring limited entry
the Cod Recency Action set minimum landing requirements for participation. Action does
not award ownership of the resource to participants, only the right to participate.
5. Action provides for increase of 200% over # of active participants. ( Includes
endorsements awarded to CQE communities. )
6. Action provides better and much needed tools for addressing sustainability, race for fish,
bycatch, and ESA issues.
7. Provides modest means for stabilizing the P. cod fishery. Look to New England area
where tools such as trip limits, weekly catch limits, and days fished limits have had
significant adverse economic impacts on the fishing industry.
8. The pot cod fishery is not an entry level fishery. The cost of entry includes significant
investments in gear and vessel. A range of investment in vessel and gear range from
$200,000 to $2,000,000. Typically new entrant vessels are from out of the state of
Alaska who have access to large amounts of capital.
9. Jig fishery component of the Cod Recency Action provides entry level opportunities.
The jig fishery component is truely an entry level oppotunity - low capital to enter,
Alaska based fishery, slow paced fishery.
10. Vast majority of the 883 groundfish licenses were generated through required landing of
P. cod as bycatch in other directed fisheries. Licenses were generated without directly
participating in the P. cod fishery. License holders have had 7 years to become active
1
in the p. cod fishery, but have not.
11. The Magnuson- Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act requires Councils
to consider ( for allocation) current and historical harvests, employment in the harvesting
and processing sectors, investments in, and dependancy upon, and the current and
historical participation of fishing communities.
12. In April of 2008, a technical report submitted to Congress by NOAA Fisheries on
behalf of the Secretary, concluded that the GOA Pacific cod fisheries were overcapacity
based on the 2004 performance of the fishery.
13. Bullets for letter to Secretary contain significant inaccuracies.
Nova Javier
From: Jerry Bongen [jbongen @mac.com]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 10:24 AM
To: scokinc @ak.net; jnifulp @gci.net; krd @ak.net; stutes @gci.net; jfriend @alaska.com; susan
jeffrey; chrislynch @acsalaska.net; Rick Gifford; jerome .selby @assembly.kodiakak.us; Nova
Javier
All,
NPFMC meets in Anchorage 6/1 thru 6/9. On the agenda is Vessel Capacity Limits ( Super 8's )
and Alternatives to the Parallel Fishery. Both of these agenda items are trailing amendments
to the Cod Recency Action and require extensive preparation for those who have been active in
the Recency Action. Any input from these folks on the the City /Borough Letter will be
impractical until after the Council adjourns.
I know the Borough wants to proceed in timely manner with discussions on the Letter,
nonetheless the folks involved with the Council deliberations hope that they will have an
opportunity to have input on the proposed Letter to the Secretary.
Thank you,
Jerry Bongen
Nova Javier
From: Jerry Bongen (jbongen @mac.com]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 9:54 AM
To: susanjeffrey
Cc: scokinc @ak.net; jnifulp @gci.net; krd @ak.net; stutes @gci.net; jfriend @alaska.com;
chrislynch @acsalaska.net; jerome .selby @assembly.kodiakak.us; Rick Gifford; Nova Javier
Sue and All,
I want to sincerely apologize for my assertion that there were factual inaccuracies in Sue
Jeffrey's bullet points concerning the letter to the Secretary of Commerce. I incorrectly
referenced the LLP numbers in the bullet points to the Central Gulf of Alaska where Kodiak
Island is located. The LLP numbers are correct for the Gulf of Alaska as stated in the bullet
points.
Again I apologize to Sue, the Assembly, and public for any harm that resulted from my
misstatement.
Sincerely,
Jerry Bongen
1
Borough Assembly Work Session
May 14, 2009
Agenda Item:
Letter to the Secretary of Commerce re: Gulf of Alaska LLP cod endorsement
Recency
•The North Pacific Fishery Management Council took action at its April meeting that reduces the
total number of Iongline and pot cod Limited License Permit (LLP) holders in the GOA from
1,147 boats to about 360.
•Roughly 790 LLP holders will be removed from the cod fishery because they did not fish cod
during the qualifying years established by the Council. The majority of the LLP holders removed
from the cod fishery, about 600, are active in other Gulf of Alaska fisheries and most of them are
Alaska fishermen.
•The federal cod fishery in the Gulf of Alaska is already a limited entry fishery. The Council's
April decision significantly reduces the number of participants in the GOA limited entry cod
fishery by 70 %, creating a nearly exclusive cod fishery for 360 longline and pot cod boat owners.
•Most commercial fishing vessels in Kodiak, like most businesses, regularly adapt to a changing
marketplace by diversifying -- in this case, by harvesting -- more than one species of fish
throughout the year. By permanently removing the ability of nearly 790 LLP holders from the cod
fishery, the Council will hinder the ability of a large class of Alaska commercial fishermen to
diversify their businesses in the future.
• The Gulf of Alaska cod fishery is very important to Kodiak and all GOA coastal communities.
The permanent removal of 790 LLP holders from the cod fishery will close the GOA's healthy
cod fishery to most new entries, which will hamper the ability of the next generation of Alaska
fishermen to make a living at sea.
• The Kodiak Fisheries Advisory Committee failed to reach consensus on LLP Cod Endorsement
Recency. Thus, it is up to the Assembly to consider whether the North Pacific Fishery
Management Council's action that dramatically reduces the cod fishing rights in the Gulf of
Alaska by 70% is beneficial to the Kodiak Island Borough.
• 1 think it is in Kodiak's best interest for the Borough Assembly to urge the Secretary of
Commerce NOT to sign off on the LLP Recency recommendation from the North Pacific Fishery
Management Council. Instead, the Assembly should request that the Secretary of Commerce
require the NPFMC to conduct a thorough socio- economic impact study BEFORE establishing a
management program that would significantly reduce the number of fishermen currently allowed
to fish cod in the Gulf of Alaska.
• In summary, I think the Assembly should resist the sense of urgency that typically surrounds
fishing issues and, instead, take the time that is necessary to understand the full impact of LLP
Recency on the Kodiak community and the smaller coastal communities in the Kodiak Island
Borough. LLP Recency has not been triggered by a biological crisis in the cod fishery. There is
no rush, no need to embrace a new fisheries management program without first analyzing the
socio - economic impact on the future of the Kodiak Island Borough and its people.
j ?u
F iry r r i l zy p eyw _4 714/r1144 11
'1Aa-4S 7 r
/6014V.1- VI) - P 7"." 1 -
P ( 512.J - C - 7 - rrivs 11 0
(r81°1/7 J2i rv)/ r/Tri
r. ler ri / tag
-1 r . a Yi e V a )-91°0
rrti (
° ‘ 7 P 714 4Y-km4214 nrywits.-1:1
'07n1 nr'9q =FkJ ; � y a°'" '0t'#otro
'01 77 -711 4' ri'D I. , TYP5516DAAlf-oad
w N °4-
-?-z_oiekt4-7 4.. 4 -- 73 -1 9 VION Sy) C+ e llgrif 19
(2;7_ (fj_ 1 tr Or 'rot'
bo ') / I r)ar4V5V Nk19 'J
71419 1/1-?1-"ni„
1. Privatization of fisheries — The Crab Rationalization plan took rights away from
the actual harvesters (fishermen) and put them into investors' hands. Investors
are disconnected from the actual fishing & only want to receive royalties. One
doesn't even have to own a vessel any more to be in enriched by CR.
2. Banks are Driving Management — Because the BSAI crab fisheries were converted
to tradable /sellable assets (Quota Shares), stabilizing bank financing is taking
management priority over biological and conservation management — and safety
goals. New options for crew buy -ins only stabilize the banks and vessel owners.
3. Restraint of Trade — The linkages between processor quotas (the buyers) and IFQs
(the sellers) result in forced deliveries (Le. 90/10), which are counter to the
competition within open markets. Boats are boycotted from delivering elsewhere.
4. Excessive Shares — Crews historical rights to participate and receive initial
allocations were confiscated unlawfully and excessive shares were awarded to
LLP /vessel owners. Exorbitant lease fees prove excessive shares were allocated.
5. Excessive QS Ownership — consolidation and CDQ- wealth buying up shares are
posing additional barriers to entry for new and smaller participants. Such factors
create inflexibility in policy /program design, and decrease price competition.
Job Losses Continue — Over - consolidation of the fleet had caused extreme job
loss. There were 1,500 Bering Sea crab crewmen previous to CR implementation,
and now (4 years later) there about 450 jobs available.
10 CRAB RATIONALIZATION ISSUES
7. Lease Fees — Exorbitant lease fees are the major cause reducing ratios for seasonal
compensation to crew. Without their own shares, the crews lack financial power.
8. Management Tools — Serious questions are arising in the arena of the pot limit
removal, discard practices, high - grading and possible future localized depletion due
to co -ops fishing. This contradicts use of traditional management tools.
9. Communities — Alaskan fishery dependent communities (King Cove, Kodiak,
Homer, & Seward) economies have been harmed as result of crew job loss,
diminished wages, and fish taxes.
10. Safety — has become a red herring to avoid discussing the unfair transfers of
wealth. When the Coast Guard started inspecting vessels the loss of life and vessels
started declining. It wasn't the CR program that increased safety.
ACOMNISIMATION
ATHLETICS
AUTO TECH
BUSINESS EDUCATION
CHILD TECH
OMWTMi TECH
s C..AH. AHT.
HHAFT1110 TECH
® FISHERIES
MEM
�EH
HEALTH SERVICES
HOME ECONOMICS
® LEARNING CENTER
r _ii ,.
I MULTI MEDIA
SCHOOL HEALTH
RURAL SCH0015
�� SCIENCE
SPECIAL EDUCATION ICS
TEACH.
MOM V„UALAa.S
® WELD*. oo;
LEA/MMLO CAFE
CALCULATION
KODIAK HIGH SCHOOL MASTER PLAN
CONCEPT 1_FIRST FLOOR JUNE 2009
SCALE 0 US'
DRAWING FILE: 0651
DRAWING NUMBER:
C1
Jensen ■■■ ARCHITECTURE I IN
Yorba ■lm LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
Lott N■M E' 7441 . — .r�
Inc NM
J
OGMRESTRW„G„ - LE.RRIRGGEHTER
ATHLETICS LIBRARY
SLIMNESS _ S TI MEDIA
- CHILO TECH � RURAL SCHOOLS
COMPUTER TECH SCIENCE
CULINARTARTS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DRAFTING TECH GENERAL ACADEMICS
- E.EHER/EG 1EACIER
,rte FOOD SERVICE -EE VISUAL ARTS
OERERK COMPUTER - WELDING TECH
- 6116616E ® HOME SCHOOL
HEALTH SERVICES - LEARNING CAFE
HOME ® 6110.1(3 OROMtC9 CIRCUUTIOH
KODIAK HIGH SCHOOL MASTER PLAN
CONCEPT 1_VOCATIONAL EDUCATION WING JUNE 2009
DRAWING FILE. 0651
DRAWING NUMBER:
C2
Jensen ■•• ARCHITECTURE
INTERIOR DESIGN
Yorba ■••
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECfURL
Lott '"
1— OEM
l
/
SPECIAL FONCATION
ATENSIVE
Commercial Kitchen
and Storage
Culinary Arts
Classroom and Lab
MULTI NEON
CLASSROOM
Corridor
AD MESTRATKOI
AHEErICG
AUTO ,EGN
L - -- — I GDMNESGEDUG.rN,I
CRRG TECH
COMPUTER TECH
® cMmM.
® GRA rING TECH
MENER�S
I I
�eI GrLDES
MEI LEARNINO CENTER
E ERM.
I i M�RMEDM
SCHOOL HEALTH
RONA„GND01.
r - -- �E S
l
I t
TEACHER
F000 SERVICE ® VISULM.S
r_ _ GENEMI COMRUIER ® WELDING TECH
® NOME SCHOOL
GUIDANCE
NERTEN SERVICES LEARNING CAFE
NOME ECONOMICS r Tam'
j MRCVLAHON
KODIAK HIGH SCHOOL MASTER PLAN
CONCEPT 1_ACADEMICS JUNE 2009
SCALE 0 n S 111
DRAWING FILE: 0651
DRAWING NUMBER:
C3
Jensen ■ ■■ T RIORDEDESIIGN
Yorba ■■■ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
Lott MIN
h- 01111 N
MAN. TM
Food
Service
Area
Corridor
— LEMONO CENTER
E__ J MULTIMEDM
— 1 SCHOOL NEM.TM
( RURAL SCHOOLS
SPECIAL EDUCATION
1 —� GENERAL ACADEMICS
TEACHER
MEM FOOD SERVICE — VISUAL PATS
GENERAL COMPUTER - WELDING RCN
MDDAN E 11111 HOME SCHOOL
LEARNME CAFE
TOUT
f I
ADMINISTRATION
ATHLETICS
AUTO TECH
SUS NESS EOUO,OON
CHILD TECH
i COMPUTER TECH
— OD H.R.M.S
— DRLmnDrecH
® MSHEMES
HEALTHSERMCES
HOME EOOnOO„OS
ILA Owes
I I
I I
oacutxrear
KODIAK HIGH SCHOOL MASTER PLAN
CONCEPT 1_ACADEMICS II JUNE 2009
DRAWING FILE 0651
DRAWING NUMBER,
C4
Jensen I •• ARCHITECTURE
INTERIOR Yorba MEM LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
CHITEC URE
Lott ■■
IiV OEM ��H....
orally &
' onsumer
ciences
Classroom
F &CS
Child /
Fashion
Lab
Choir Areas
KODIAK HIGH SCHOOL MASTER PLAN
CONCEPT 1_ACADEMICS III JUNE 2009
SCALE. 0 A Ie
ADMINISTRATION
AUTO TECN
BUSINESS E H EDUCATION
- COMPUTER TECH
CUMMAA`I ARTS
DRAFTING TECH
M9IERER
® FOOD SERVICE
t I
GENERAL COMPUTER
MEM TNSERNCES
IL _1 UT UTILITIES
ECONOMICS
t I
LEARNING CENTER
i- 1 MM TIMEOM
ECIIOOLNEAIM
RURAL SONOMA
L— ECENCE
BPECALEDUCATION
_1 GENERAL ACADEMICS
TEACHER
VISUAL ARTS
OUWNCE E . - - -1 NOME SCHOOL
LEARNING CAFE
C - TOREr
L GIRO RAARON
DRAWING FILE 0651
DRAWING NUMBER:
C5
Jensen •■■ ARCH TECRIRE
Yorba ■■■
INTERIOR DESIGN
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
Lott O ■■ °'„ v:
J
l
1
6
KODIAK HIGH SCHOOL MASTER PLAN
CONCEPT 1_SECOND FLOOR JUNE 2009
DRAWING FILE. 0651
DRAWING NUMBER.
C6
Jensen ME■ ARCHITECTURE
Yorba ■E■
INTERIOR DESIGN
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
Lott ■�
In.' MOM _,
� S I.s Ti1<
PARKING STALLS
I I (1_1 l I it I IJ
KODIAK
HIGH
SCHOOL
STI„I.GF
AC1 CV.
ACCLSS
SWIMMING
POOL
AUDITORIUM
M AINTENANCE
MIDDLE
SCHOOL
40 STUDENT rARRo-4c STALLS
RETAINING1 A,
1111111 I1LLLLUJ 1 11111 H 1JJJ H HJ
1- H11f —f Lvl.,n III 1
TOTAL PARKING STALLS: in
LOSS OF 1”TALIB
EAST REZANOF DRIVE
VEGETATION
LEGEND
SHADE TREE
CVNIEEP
ORNAMENTAL
TREE
SHIMS
0 LAWN
ISTINC TREES
KODIAK HIGH SCHOOL MASTER PLAN
CONCEPT 1_SITE PLAN JUNE 2009
EGLE: 0' 0S 00 100'
DRAWING FILE: 0651
DRAWING NUMBER:
C7
J ensen ■ ■■ ARCHITECTURE
Yorba ■ ■■ INTERIOR DESIGN
Lott s ANDSCAPE ARCHIIECLURE
16111611
INT
F ‘ , .. 0 1 1 91! 11 14..
-
ADMINSTRATION
MEM
AUTO TECH
.8114.38 EDUCATION
- aill0 TECH
MINI COMPUTER TECH
!Imo CULINARY NITS
=ME ow TECH
MEN
KIM= roar, E WIC E
0.ERAL COMINITER
WINN.
NEN.T.I SERVICES
NOME ECONOMICS
MIME
LEMMING CENTER
1.1., MEDIA
6.00L HEALTH
RURAL SCHOOLS
SCIEMCE
SPECIAL EDUCATION
TEACHER
fr7= VISUALAATS
E77T WELLING TE.
.01.1E SCHOOL
NMI CAFE
TOW
KODIAK HIGH SCHOOL MASTER PLAN
CONCEPT 1_ATHLETICS AREA JUNE 2009
SCALE 0 4' 0'
DRAWING FILE 0651
DRAWING NUMBER:
C8
J ensen NM ARCHITECTURE
INTERIOR DESIGN
Yorba MEI LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
Lott NMI
011111
OO ;// j/ �\ J //` ` ji Q j/ S j/ /***1J/ Q 1OOj/�\//\�//Oj/V***O//O*** ; O j/\ OFt;
0 !`/i\ii ` xx ji\s j \j `! ,
EXIST
CORR.
EXISTING I OCKFR ROAM AREA
AUTO ;ARV GYMNASIUM
NEW ROOF t WALL STRUCTURE
REMOVE MIST ROOF STRUCTURE
WRESTI ING / WEIGHT ROOM
MECHANICAL SPACE
;FORMER SWIMMING POOL;
i,00•:o ,
KODIAK HIGH SCHOOL MASTER PLAN
SECTION ONE: GYMNASIUM / NEW AUXILIARY GYM MAY 2009
DRAWING FILE 0651
DRAWING NUMBER:
51
Jensen ■.. MT DESIGN D
Yorba ■■■ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
LottU■� � �.
IRC.•.. "1:r
1
RENEWAL & REPLACEMENT ESTIMATE 6/11/2009
Main Remove UST
Karluk Remove UST
Boro. Build. New Roof
East Generator & Building
High School Replace Wooden Gym Floor
FY 2010
TOTAL 2,841,321
Akhiok Sewer Line 72,100
High School Fire Alarms 241,588
Boro. Build. Sidewalk and Handrail Repairs 42,990
Auditorium Roof 927,485
High School Parking Lot Paving 481,808
Boro. Build. Replace Air louvers 20,635
Boro. Build. Duct Cleaning 103,175
East Close(in place) & Replace UST 65,557
Middle School Close(in place) & Replace US 65,557
Demo Old Chiniak School 103,000
High School Boiler Gun Units 123,600
Boro. Build. Return Air duct for 2nd floor 257,938
Boro. Build. Seal all Ducts 4,299
Boro. Build. Move Gen Set 240,742
Boro. Build. Relocate Fuel Oil Piping 41,270
Main Roof 49,577
FY 2011
3,141,502
74,603
87,715
1,167,982
765,748
438,955
392,443
143,923
46,774
21,236
2,123
Larsen Bay Old HVAC Equip
Larsen Bay Old HVAC Controls
East Old Kitchen Piping
Boro Build. Boiler Combustion Air Fan
Boro Build.Vents at Roof Extensions
Peterson Parking Lot Paving
East Flooring
Old Harbor HVAC Controls
Peterson Flooring
East Old Case work
Old Harbor Flooring
Larsen Bay Exterior Paint
East Exterior Paint
Chiniak Remove UST
Port Lions Remove UST
Auditorium Exterior Doors
Boro. Build. New Receptacles
Boro. Build.Power Distribution Panels
Akhiok Play Grounds
Larsen Bay Old Windows
Boro. Build. Lighting
Peterson Boiler HVAC Controls
Middle School HVAC Controls
Boro. Build. DDC Control system
Middle School Gym Floor Replacement
Boro. Build Replace Boilers
Boro. Build. Asbestos Boiler Room
FY 2012
2,854,724
676,400
477,157
336,656
268,185
225,188
158,895
144,840
108,217
83,385
82,982
71,750
63,691
58,232
43,600
23,930
21,837
9,779
FY 2013
2,672,243
1,257,726
411,365
341,026
280,476
149,587
FY 201
2,755,383
RENEWAL & REPLACEMENT ESTIMATE 6/11/20091 FY 2011 I FY 2012 I FY 2013 FY 2014 I
3,141,502 2,854,724 2,672,243 2,755,383
Auditorium Flooring foyer and hall
Akhiok Teacherage Flooring
East Old Exterior Doors
Boro. Build. Boiler Room Upgrades
Akhiok Teacherage Plumbing
East New Boilers & Building
High School Upgrade Generator
Boro. Build. New Flooring
Boro. Build. Asbestos under Carpet
Main Gym floor Replacement
Main Exterior Paint
Peterson Exterior Paint
Karluk Flooring
Karluk Interior Paint
Larsen Bay Old Elect Lighting
Port Lions Play Grounds
Ouzinkie Play Grounds
Old Harbor Play Grounds
High School 1972 Add. Exterior Doors
Karluk Gen Exterior Doors
99,594
46,087
46,078
24,308
15,996
481,581
432,337
307,188
268,790
201,931
190,527
187,942
159,242
140,444
129,309
69,000
69,000
69,000
43,856
5,236
Possible overlap w /KHS new construction & renovation project 1,206,207
School District Renewal and Replacement Projects
School Projects
Borough Projects
Issuance Costs
Total Bond
Annual Cost
School District
Borough
Total Costs
One mill equals $1,000,000
Proposed Bonds
8,340,000
3,360,000
11, 700, 000
300,000
12,000,000
1,050,000
Total
Annual
Expense
748,462
301,538
1,050,000
71%
29%
Less State
@70%
Reimbursement
(523,923)
Mill Rate
(523,923)
Annual
Borough
Cost
224,538
301,538
526,077
0.53
School Projects
Annual Cost
School District
One mill equals $1,000,000
New High School
80,000,000
7,000,000
Total
Annual
Expense
7,000,000
Less State
Reimbursement
@60%
(4,200,000)
Mill Rate
Annual
Borough
Cost
2,800,000
2.80
I Annual Borough Cost of Both Issues
3,326,077
3.33
I Cost to Taxpayer with $250,000 home
833
Fiscal Summary of Bonded Debt Total Current 2010 2011 2012 2013 Proposed
Year Principal Interest Total Reimbursable Net Payment Bond Issue Bond Issue Bond Issue Bond Issue Net Payment Mills
2009 2,540,000 1,776,268 4,316,268 (2,841,558) 1,474,711 - 1,474,711 1.47
2010 2,645,000 1,690,666 4,335,666 (2,853,236) 1,482,431 131,250 1,613,681 1.61
2011 2,765,000 1,590,654 4,355,654 (2,865,309) 1,490,345 131,250 131,250 1,621,595 1.62
2012 2,525,000 1,482,886 4,007,886 (2,620,373) 1,387,514 131,250 131,250 131,250 1,518,764 1.52
2013 2,625,000 1,386,281 4,011,281 (2,622,385) 1,388,896 131,250 131,250 131,250 131,250 1,520,146 1.52
2014 2,745,000 1,296,471 4,041,471 (2,640,693) 1,400,778 131,250 131,250 131,250 131,250 1,532,028 1.53
2015 1,315,000 1,194,031 2,509,031 (1,566,653) 942,378 131,250 131,250 131,250 131,250 1,073,628 1.07
2016 1,370,000 1,153,081 2,523,081 (1,575,260) 947,821 131,250 131,250 131,250 131,250 1,079,071 1.08
2017 1,425,000 1,114,311 2,539,311 (1,584,621) 954,690 131,250 131,250 131,250 131,250 1,085,940 1.09
2018 1,485,000 1,066,099 2,551,099 (1,592,081) 959,018 131,250 131,250 131,250 131,250 1,090,268 1.09
2019 1,550,000 1,025,169 2,575,169 (1,606,353) 968,816 131,250 131,250 131,250 131,250 1,100,066 1.10
2020 1,620,000 972,949 2,592,949 (1,617,169) 975,780 131,250 131,250 131,250 131,250 1,107,030 1.11
2021 1,685,000 916,086 2,601,086 (1,622,053) 979,033 131,250 131,250 131,250 131,250 1,110,283 1.11
2022 1,760,000 861,337 2,621,337 (1,634,107) 987,230 131,250 131,250 131,250 131,250 1,118,480 1.12
2023 1,845,000 801,943 2,646,943 (1,649,648) 997,294 131,250 131,250 131,250 131,250 1,128,544 1.13
2024 1,930,000 733,630 2,663,630 (1,659,646) 1,003,984 131,250 131,250 131,250 131,250 1,135,234 1.14
2025 1,330,000 664,930 1,994,930 (1,196,958) 797,972 131,250 131,250 131,250 131,250 929,222 0.93
2026 540,000 624,460 1,164,460 (698,676) 465,784 131,250 131,250 131,250 131,250 597,034 0.60
2027 565,000 623,000 1,188,000 (712,800) 475,200 131,250 131,250 131,250 131,250 606,450 0.61
2028 595,000 624,750 1,219,750 (731,850) 487,900 131,250 131,250 131,250 131,250 619,150 0.62
Total 34,860,000 21,599,002 56,459,002 (35,891,428) 20,567,574 2,493,750 2,362,500 2,231,250 2,100,000 23,061,324
1,800,000 <"-
1,600,000 -
1,400,000
1,200,000
1,000,000
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000
� r
i$i rrrrrr rrr
I=i iii H iHiIIi
Current Debt Service • Proposed Debt Service
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028
d O(rYL. 11 - L,
WI
�a,ha -. L iv - e.c4 !
j1riv Ka
64 2 ' v 1-- \S"i'k-
4 ri I S
✓n /e;
.4.,,,_44,
-'/i
, ,_.,
- irNie 1141-111,9e)L
7s»( 5 /.
%(,9,V 5
f?6N4-t o
G 7fto4-1 PSc/u
s' Y'+ ' I c Patio, 1 cl
&Ai 2-114
S ebT P4i 1-4.4 /1 3
KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH
ASSEMBLY WORK SESSION
Work Session of: k /i o 9
Please PRINT your name
Please PRINT your name