02/24/2005 Work SessionASSEMBLY WORK SESSION
February 24, 2005 - 7:30 p.m.
Borough Conference Room
CITJ7FNS' COMMENTS (limited to three minutes per speaker)
ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION
1. Kodiak Branding Committee Funding Request
2. Parks and Recreation Committee
3. Fee Schedule
4. House Bill 130
5. Letters to DNR and AADC
6. City of Kodiak Groundfish Resolution
PACKET REVIEW
MANAGER'S COMMENTS
CLERK'S COMMENTS
MAYOR'S COMMENTS
ASSEMBLYMEMBER COMMENTS
Branson - February 20 -24 - March 4 -13 - April 14 -23
Wells - February 27 - March 2
Anderson - March 22 -30
5
t:47041r
February 2005
24- 7:30 pm Assembly Work Session - CR
7:30 pm City Council Regular Meeting - AC
25 7 - 9 pm Boards and Committees Reception - KFRC
28- 5:15 pm School Board Budget Work Session - SD /CR
7:00 pm Womens Bay Serivice Area Board Meeting - WBFH
March 2005
1 - 7:30 pm Joint Assembly /City Council Work Session - CR
3- 12:15 pm Emergency Services Committee - CR
1:30 pm LocafEmergency Planning Committee - AC
7:30 pm Assembly Regular Meeting - AC
7- 5:15 pm School Board Budget Work Session - SD /CR
7:00 pm School Board Work Session - SD /CR
8- 6:00 pm Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting - TO BE ANNOUNCED
7:30 pm Planning and Zoning Commission Work Session - CR
7:30 pm Fire Protection Area No. 1 Board Meeting - BFH
CANCELED City Council Work Session
9- 7:30 pm Planning and Zoning Commission Work Session - CR
10- 7:30 pm Assembly Work Session - CR (School Board(capital projects))
CANCELED City Council Regular Meeting
16- 7:30 pm Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting - AC
17- 7:30 pm Assembly Regular Meeting - AC
21- 5:15 pm School Board Budget Work Session - SD /CR
22- 7:00 pm Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting - CR
7:30 pm City Council Work Session - SD /CR
24- 7:30 pm City Council Regular Meeting - AC
28- CLOSED Borough Offices Closed in Observance of Seward's Day
5:15 pm School Board Budget Work Session - SD /CR
7:00 pm School Regular Meeting - AC
31- 7:30 pm Assembly Work Session - CR (Planning and Zoning Commission)
April 2005
4 - 5:15 pm School Board B Work Session - SD /CR
7:00 pm School Board Work Session - SD /CR
7- 7:30 pm Assembly Regular Meeting - AC
11- 5:15 pm School Board Budget Work Session - SD /CR
12- 7:00 pm Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting - CR
7:30 pm City Council Work Session - SD /CR
13- 7:30 pm Planning and Zoning Commission Work Session - CR
14- 7:30 pm Assembly Work Session - CR
7:30 pm City Council Regular Meeting - AC
18- 5:15 pm School Board Budget Work Session - SD /CR
7:00 pm School Board Regular Meeting - AC
20- 7:30 pm Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting - AC
21- 7:30 pm Assembly Regular Meeting - AC
26- 7:00 pm Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting - CR
7:30 pm City Council Work Session - SD /CR
28- 7:30 pm Assembly Work Session - CR
7:30 pm City Council Regular Meeting - AC
Kodiak Branding and Marketing Committee Funding Request to KIB
February 10, 2005
In August of 2003 The KBMC requested support from the MB to provide matching
funds for two grants that were being applied for at that time. The Borough Assembly
unanimously supported the community's salmon revitalization effort by pledging $20,000
to be administered through the Chamber / KBMC. Of the two grants applied for
(NOAA/S -K and USDANADG), neither were awarded, and the $20,000 was never used.
In January of this year, KBMC was awarded a grant from the Alaska DCED/UAF
Salmon Mini- marketing program to continue its growing Star of Kodiak regional
marketing effort. The budget for this grant included a $25,000 line item for project
management/staff, a new position needed to assist with the expanded activities of the
project. This item was not allowed by DCED, and the 25K was removed from the grant
total.
At this time KBMC would like to request that the Borough recommit the 20K match to
make up for the shortfall in the current grant award. The fiords will be used for a
seasonal (6 month) position to plan, develop and oversee the quality assurance
component of the regional marketing effort. Duties will include a ground -up development
of the `Star of Kodiak" quality assurance program (Budget item 7) to be ready for the
2005 Salmon season.
A successful quality assurance program is central to the entire regional branding concept,
and one of the most challenging to address. We need to begin the search for a qualified
and dedicated individual as soon as possible in order to meet the objectives outlined in
the project timetable.
Star of Kodiak Quality Program Manager Position:
April 1- Sept 15
@$26.25/hr for 22 weeks $23,000
Chamber of Commerce / admin $ 2.000
$25,000
Funding sources:
MB $20,000
AFMB/USA grant $ 4,400 Total $24,400
ITEM description
Budget
request
Match
1. Star of Kodiak brand promo & training videos/DVDs
a. Wholesale
b. Retail
c. Training
$25,000
May
2. Still photography database/ library
(for ongoing web and mkt materials development)
$10,000
AFMB Website
$2,000
3. Promotional folder /press kit, marketing materials
Design and Production
$6,000
AFMB $12,000
4. Promotions
3 promotions, (retail and restaurant) (43,600 /promo
$10,800
X
5. Samples, shipping, storage
$4,000
6. Customer visits to fishing, processing sites, (a? 1,200 /trip
$2,400
7. Quality program development
a. Consulting for program design and setup
b. Trainings, travel, recruitment,
c. Third Party oversight (ISIS), equipment
$8,000
$3,200
$6,000
AFMB $4,400
8. Project management /staff
$25,000
Market material
Design/production
9. Travel (meetings with processors — program development)
$5,000
X
10. Project administration
Accounting, reporting, communications 0600 /month (x12)
X
Kodiak Chamber
in -kind $7,200
11. Office, computer, communications support
USA in -kind
$8,000
TOTAL BUDGET REQUEST
$105,400
— $37,600
ACTUAL GRANT AWARDED
$ 80,000
2005
Jan
Feb
Mar
April
May
June
July
Aug
Sept
Oct
Nov
Dec
Promotions
X
X
X
(X)
Market material
Design/production
X
X
X
X
X
(X)
Quality planning
X
Quality training
X
X
X
Quality oversight
X
X
X
X
Video/Photography
X
X
X
X
Customer visits
X
X
X
Marketing Travel
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Samples, shipping
X
(X
X
X)
Budget and Timetable from the 2005 DCED/UAF Salmon Mini- Marketing Grant
Budget
Timetable including milestones tagged to expenditures
Memo
To: Kodiak Island Borough Assembly
Front Pam Foreman, Chair Parks and Recreation Committee
Date: 02/24/05
Re: Parks and Recreation Update
Thank you for taking the time to meet with the Parks and Recreation Committee in your meeting this evening. We wanted
you to have a few items to review before and during the meeting tonight. The Parks and Recreation Committee has come a
long way in its efforts to represent all of the community in recreational interests. The restructuring of the committee,
incorporating the ATV committee interests as well as other recreational interests, has been successful. As the committee
reflected the other night, we have evolved to a common vision - instead of individuals defending turf for this group or that
group, we have realized that the common ground is access, open space and recreation of all kinds
Here are just a few of the projects the committee has tackled in the recent past:
• Trails survey and report
• Trails mapping and GIS work
• Reviewed several subdivision plans and made some recommendations for open space set - asides and pocket parks
• Detailed review of the Kodiak Area Plan with recommendations forwarded to Planning and Zoning and the Assembly.
These recommendations were ultimately forwarded to DNR as part of the Kodiak Island Borough recommendations.
• Developed an outline and plan for an update of the Parks, Recreation, Open Space and Trails Plan. As part of this
process we developed a draft vision statement.
We have identified the following items as priorities for the immediate future:
Overall Priority:
Complete the update of the Parks, Recreation, Open Space and Trails Plan (PROST).
Parks Priorities:
1. White Sands Beach Recreation Area
2. Mill Bay Beach Access
3. Pocket parks/open space in upcoming subdivision developments
Trails Priorities:
1. North Star Bike Path
2. Island Lake Trail
3. Lake Miam Trail
2
Parks and Recreation Committee duties from Borough Code 2.43.010: The Committee is
empowered to:
A. Identify existing and future recreation demands including indoor and outdoor
recreation;
B. Evaluate existing and future recreation needs;
C. Generate priorities and action plans including a capital improvement program for
parks and recreation; and
D. Review and recommend revisions as necessary to the adopted comprehensive parks
and recreation plan.
The Vision
for the Kodiak Island Borough -Parks and Recreation Committee
Developed August 2004
Core Ideology
Core Values
1. Conserve Kodiak's uniqueness
2. Advocate for a health community (economic, social, mental, cultural, spiritual, physical)
3. Respect varied recreational interests.
4. Defending recreation and open space opportunities for the community.
5. Promote access to lands and waters in the Kodiak Island Borough.
Core Purpose
To advance the enjoyment of life and health of the Kodiak community
Envisioned Future
Kodiak, a vibrant, thriving community for all ages, is where we work and play. The community is
cooperative and mutually respectful of its residents and their choices of recreational activity.
Healthy partnerships have been initiated to enhance recreational opportunities. We are proud of
our rich and varied cultural and historical past. Kodiak's residents have embraced a healthy, active
lifestyle, through a diversity of active recreational opportunities. Trails, walkways, bicycle paths,
parks, and open space interconnect the urban community. Kodiak has a public transportation system
linked to a strategic system of urban trails. The scenic quality of its mountain vistas and waterways
are preserved for all future generations. Unspoiled open space still exists along its coasts and
backcountry. Public lands and waters are as accessible in 2034 as they are today.
The remote road system is left undeveloped to provide public access for Kodiak's urban residents to
reach these unspoiled lands, waters, and our world -class trail system. Kodiak's great open spaces
are left untouched for future generations to enjoy, with hunting, fishing, and remote hiking
opportunities preserved. To enhance the enjoyment of unspoiled nature along its trails and routes, a
few well - placed shelters and cabins are developed. Kodiak is the Mecca of coastal Alaska providing
opportunities for discerning outdoorsman and naturalists. We are the New Zealand of the North.
Parks, Recreation, Open Space and Trails (PROST)
Comprehensive Planning Process
Scope of Work Outline
A. Introduction.
Kodiak Island Borough
Parks and Recreation Committee
What are the Borough /City /School District/Non- profit organization
role(s) in providing parks, recreation, open space and trail facilities and
services for Kodiak residents and visitors?
What are the objectives of the PROST comprehensive planning
process?
What is the relationship to current and previous plans —
✓ 1978 KIB Parks and Recreation Plan
✓ City of Kodiak plans, projects and facilities
✓ Private /non - profit plans and existing services
✓ DNR Kodiak Area Plan
✓ Others?
B. Goals and Objectives
✓ Vision statement and overall goals.
✓ Top priority goals, objectives and policies for parks, recreation
facilities, open space areas and trails. (i.e. planning policies to
implement the top priority goals)
DRAFT
What are the purpose and objectives of the plan?
✓ Identify existing parks, recreation facilities, open space, and
trails;
✓ Identify community trends, future demands and needs;
✓ Identify potential park and recreation facilities, open space and
trail locations;
✓ Identify and prioritize strategies to meet level of service
standards identified in the PROST Comprehensive Plan; and
✓ Identify funding sources, partnerships and other forms of
implementation methods.
October 28, 2004 Page 1 of 3
Parks, Recreation, Open Space and Trails (PROST)
Comprehensive Planning Process
Scope of Work Outline
C. Planning Area
✓ Explanation of Kodiak urban area and Borough road - served
area(s) including geophysical, demographics, climate, economy,
political subdivision(s), tax structure, funding sources, and other
influences.
D. Existing Parks, Recreation, Open Space and Trail Resources
✓ KIB and City parkland and facility inventory (neighborhood
parks, community parks, regional parks, community center,
open space, etc.)
✓ Existing KIB school district and private /non profit recreation
facilities
✓ Environmentally and culturally sensitive areas identification
✓ KIB road system trails inventory
E. Issues and Needs Analysis
✓ Analysis of population and demographic characteristics
✓ KIB Development patterns
✓ Peer community comparisons
✓ National and State recreation trends, needs and standards
✓ Responses to key community- identified issues and needs
• Key service organizations
• Conservation groups
• Tourism, arts and culture organizations
• City of Kodiak
• KIB School district
✓ Summary of Parks, Recreation, Open Space and Trail Issues
and Needs
F. Master Plan Recommendations (CIP Projects)
✓ The Master Plan
• Park projects
• Trail projects
• Recreational facility projects
• Open space conservation areas
• Public access to coastal shorelines
• Others?
DRAFT
October 28, 2004 Page 2 of 3
Parks, Recreation, Open Space and Trails (PROST)
Comprehensive Planning Process
Scope of Work Outline
G. Implementation
H. List of Maps
✓ Implementation actions
• Planning actions
• Project actions
• Upgrades and maintenance actions
• Administrative and management actions
• Funding actions
✓ Potential implementation tools
• Administrative structures
• Revenue sources
• Land acquisition strategies
• Regulatory tools and land use planning
✓ Existing parks and recreation facilities
✓ Existing trails in the KIB road served area
✓ Existing open space areas
✓ Existing sensitive areas (environmental and cultural)
✓ Others?
I. List of Tables
✓ Other
✓ Etc.
J. List of Figures
✓ Other
✓ Etc.
K. Appendices
✓ Other
✓ Etc.
DRAFT
October 28, 2004 Page 3 of 3
Requested by: KIB Park & Rec. Committee
Introduced by: KIB Park & Rec. Committee
Drafted by: Community Development Dept
Introduced: 2/22/05
Adopted: 2/22/05
KODIAK I S L AND BORO PARKS & RECREATION COMMITTEE
RESOLUTION NO. 20015 -03
A RESOLUTION OF THE KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH PARKS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE,
RECOMMENDING ASSEMBLY RESPONSE TO PENDING HOUSE BILL 130 (HB 130).
WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Committee has previously advised the Planning
and Zoning Commission and Borough Assembly regarding state lands through the
recent DNR planning process for the Kodiak Area Plan for Alaska State Lands; and
WHEREAS, the Committee now wishes to make additional comment regarding HB 130, which
in the Narrow Cape area has the potential to impact significant recreational resources relied
upon by Borough residents; and
WHEREAS, the Committee believes that time is of the essence to make comment on this fast
moving legislative initiative.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH PARKS
AND RECREATION COMMITTEE THAT:
The Kodiak Island Borough Parks and Recreation Committee, hereby recommends
to the Kodiak Island Borough Assembly that, in the event the Narrow Cape parcel is
included in HB130, the Assembly advise our legislators to incorporate specific language
into the proposed that will protect and maintain continued public access to the Narrow
Cape lands and waters in this and any future conveyances or sales of the land; and
Furthermore, be it resolved that because Narrow Cape is a highly valued
recreational use area on the road system, that if HB 130 moves forward, language also be
included in the bill to provide the Kodiak Island Borough a "first right of refusal" should
the land be subsequently sold or conveyed by the University of Alaska.
ADOPTED BY THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE OF THE KODIAK
ISLAND BOROUGH THIS TWENTY- SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2005.
ATTEST:
Duane Dvorak, Secretary
Kodiak Island Borough
KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH
FEE SCHEDULE
Effective July 1, 2003
Amended September 4, 2003
REPRODUCTION OF BOROUGH RECORDS
Copies, per page, general public
Copies, per page, government and non - profits
Certified copies (does not include copy charges)
Cassette tape recordings
Operating & Capital Budget
Annual Audit & Financial Report
Comprehensive plans, paper
Comprehensive plans, cd
ASSEMBLY AND COMMISSION AGENDAS, MINUTES & PACKETS (Annual Mailing Fees)
Agenda & Minute Mailing, Assembly
Agenda & Minute Mailing, P & Z
Assembly Packet, Complete Mailing
P & Z Packet, Complete Mailing
BOROUGH CODE OF ORDINANCES
Borough Code, Complete
Supplement Service (Annual Fee)
Title 6, complete
Title 15, complete
Title 16, complete
Title 17, complete
Any of the above titles on CD
ASSESSMENT AND PROPERTY TAX FEES
Full reproduction of tax map
Includes 3' x 5' base map and unbound (complete book by book copies)
Individual page copies (11' x 17 ")
Complete certified Assessment roll
Complete certified Assessment roll, 1 yr subscription updated quarterly
Foreclosure Fee
Publication Fee (based on prior year publication)
GENERAL SERVICES
Wire Transfer Fee
NSF Check Fee
Notary Service, per document
Electronically Reproduced Records, up to 5 pages
(For documents over 5 pages in length, add $0 25 per page)
Monthly Fee for Online Computer Services
Borough Building Office Rent (per square foot)
New/Transfer Liquor Lisence
KODIAK FISHERIES RESEARCH CENTER
Main Lobby (upstairs/down - fee includes large conference room)
Refundable cleaning deposit, main lobby
Large Conference Room
Refundable cleaning deposit, large conference room
Small Conference Room
Refundable cleaning deposit, small conference room
REPRODUCTION COSTS
Large Scale Copy Machine Charges
Xerox Bond
$0.25
$0.05
$5.00
$20.00
$0.00
$0.00
$25.00
$5.00
$50.00
$50.00
$300.00
$200.00
$125.00
$45.00
$2.50
$7.50
$10.00
$25.00
$5.00
$400.00
$1.30 /page
$250.00
$400.00
$40.00
actual cost
$25.00
$25.00
$5.00
$6.00
$25.00
$1.75
$1.00 per notice mailed
BAYSIDE FIRE STATION COMMUNITY TRAINING CENTER
Refundable Cleaning Deposit $50.00
One -half of Training Center, per half day (1 -6 hrs, max 49 people) $15.00
One -half of Training Center, per day (6 -10 hrs, max 49 people) $25.00
Full Training Center, per half day (1 -6 hrs, max 100 people) $30.00
Full Training Center, per day (6 -10 hrs, max 100 people) $50.00
• Non -profit organizations and public safety agencies who do not charge a fee for the activity being conducted may apply for a waiver of Training Center use fees.
$250.00
$300.00
$50.00
$50.00
$40.00
$30.00
Small 18" x 24"
24" x 24"
Standard 24" x 36"
Medium 36" x 36"
36" x 48"
Large 36" x 60"
36" x 72"
36" x 84"
Xerox Mylar
Small 18" x 24"
24" x 24"
24" x 36"
Medium 36" x 36"
36" x 48"
Large 36" x 60"
36" x 72"
36" x 84"
MAPPING AND RESEARCH SERVICES
Drafting and plotting services. (1/4 hr minimum)
Digitized Data of Autocad products (per 1 megabyte + cost of disk)
Research Service, records recovery (1 hr minimum)
Research Service, data analysis (1 hr minimum)
PLOTTED MAPS
Line drawings
Images/Full Color Plots - bond paper
Images/Full Color Plots - photo quality paper
' No copying or commercial use, except for reference
CD copy of aerial photos
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE FEES:
FEDERAL & STATE GRANTS
Amount of Grant x Percent
Up to $100,000 x 3%
100,000 to 500,000 x 2.5%
500,000 to 1,000,000 x 2%
1,000,000 and up x 1.5%
ACCOUNTING SERVICE FEES
Administrative Service Fees
TITLE 6: ANIMALS (KIBC 6.04.070)
A. License Fees
1) Male dog (per year)
2) Female dog (per year)
3) Neuter and spayed dogs (per year)
4) Duplicate tag (each)
B. Boarding Fees
1) Small animals (dogs, cats, etc.)(per day)
2) Large animals (cows, horses, etc.)(per day)
C. Animal Control Offenses
1) Cruelty to Animals (KIBC 6.04.010 A -D)
a. 1st offense
b. 2nd offense
c. 3rd offense
2) Contagious animals (KIBC 6.04.020)
a. 1st offense
$3.00
$4.00
$6.00
$9.00
$12.00
$15.00
$18.00
$21.00
$5.00
$6.00
$8.00
$10.00
$15.00
$20.00
$25.00
$30.00
$40.00 /Hr
$0.10
$40.00 /Hr
$60.00 /Hr
$2.00 /sq It
$4.50 /sq ft
$10.00 /sq It
$10.00/path
$10.00 service fee
$5.00 per cd
Up to $ 3,000.00
$2,500.00 - $12,500.00
510,000.00 - $20,000.00
15,000.00 and up
3% of entity's budget
535.00
535.00
$10.00
$5.00
$5.00
$50.00
mandatory court appearance
mandatory court appearance
mandatory court appearance
$55.00
b. 2nd offense
c. 3rd offense
3) Annoying animals (KIBC 6.04.030)
a. 1st offense
b. 2nd offense
c. 3rd offense
4) Tethering (KIBC 6.04.040)
a. 1st offense
b. 2nd offense
c. 3d offense
5) Control of animals (KIBC 6.04.050BD & KIBC 6.04.180A)
a. 1st offense
b. 2nd offense
c. 3rd offense
6) Vicious animals (KIBC 6.04.050A)
a. 1st offense
b. 2nd offense
c. 3d offense
7) Animal littering (KIBC 6.04.060)
a. 1st offense
b. 2nd offense
c. 3d offense
8) Animal identification (KIBC 6.04.070)
a. 1st offense
b. 2nd offense
c. 3d offense
9) Tag and collar (KIBC 6.04.080)
a. 1st offense
b. 2nd offense
c. 3rd offense
D. Miscellaneous Fees
1) Rabies vaccinations deposit (paritally refundable)
2) Adoption (includes neuter or spay, rabies shot, license)
TITLE 10: VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC (KIBC 10.10.060)
Junk Vehicle removal, per vehicle
Removal of Non - vehicle junk (percentage of cost of removal)
TITLE 16: SUBDIVISIONS (GENERALLY KIBC 16.10.060)
Waivers (16.10.050)
Abbreviated /Aliquot Part Plats
Plan Review Services:
Improvement Plan Review
Initial and Final Plan
Additional Improvement Plan Reviews
Site Grading Plan Review
Materials Approval Services
First Submittal
Subsequent Reviews
Inspection Services - General
Personnel
$82.50
$110.00
$27.50
$55.00
$82.50
$27.50
$55.00
$82.50
$55.00
$82.50
$110.00
mandatory court appearance
mandatory court appearance
mandatory court appearance
$27.50
$55.00
$82.50
$27.50
$55.00
$82.50
$27.50
$55.00
$82.50
$20.00
actual cost
$65.00
50%
$
$200.00
Preliminary Plats Creating:
1 to 12 lots $250.00
13 to 50 lots $250.00 + $20.00 for each additional lot over 12
Over 50 lots $1,010.00 + $15.00 for each additional lot over 50
Vacations $250.00
Appeal to Commission (16.100) $150.00
Review of P &ZC Decision (16.90.010) $50.00
Appeal to Assembly (16.90) $150.00
Appeal Record copy, per page $0.10
$200.00
$100.00
$250.00
$200.00
$60.00
ST
OT
DT
Vehicle
Hours
Mileage
Administrative Fee
Inspection Services - Subdivision
Road and Utility Improvement (per lineal ft)
Improvements for 1 to 12 lots
Improvements for 13 lots and more
ZONING
Conditional Use Permit (17.04.010 A)
Variance (17.040.010 D)
Zoning Change (17.040.010 E)
Other PBZC Approval (e.g. 17.21.050 C)
Appeal to Commission (17.90)
Review of P&ZC Decision (17.80)
Appeal to Assembly (17.100)
Appeal Record Copy, per page
Zoning Compliance Permit (17.03.060)
`See Dumpster fees (per square foot of new construction)
Postponement at Petioner's request - Public Hearing Item
Postponement at Petioner's request - Non - Public Hearing Item
TITLE 18: BOROUGH REAL PROPERTY
Land disposal application (18.20.060 A)
Land Use Permits, annually (18.50.010 C)
Wood Cutting Permits
Material Sales (18.60)
Use Fee (per site, annually)
Royalty fee, per cubic yard (annually)
Building Permit Fees
value = up to $500.00
value = 500.01 - 2,000.00
value = 2,000.01 - 25,000.00
value = 25,000.01 - 50,000.00
value = 50,000.01 - 100,000.00
value = 100,000.01 to 500,000.00
value = 500,000.01 to 1,000,000.00
value = 1,000,000.01 and up
Building Demolition Fee
Other inspection fees:
Inspections outside of normal business hours (per hour, 2 hr min)
Reinspection fees assessed under provisions of section 305 g
$40.00 /hr
$56.00 /hr
$72.00/hr
$1.70/hr
$0.30 /mi
10%
$3.50/If
$2.00/If
$250.00
$250.00
$250.00
$75.00
$250.00
$75.00
$250.00
$0.10
$25.00
$0.27
$100.00
$25.00
$200.00
$250.00
$5.00
$5,000.00
$1.25
$15.00
$15.00 for the first $500 plus $2.00 for each
additional $100 or fraction thereof, to and including
$2,000.00
$45.00 for the first $2,000 plus $9.00 for each
additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and
including $25,000.00
$252.00 for the first $25,000 plus $6.50 for each
additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and
including $50,000.00
$414.50 for the first $50,000 plus $4.50 for each
additional $1,000 or fractin thereof, to and including
$100,000.00
$639.50 for the first $100,000 plus $3.50 for each
additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and
including $500,000.00
$2,039.50 for the first $500,000 plus $3.00 for
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and
including $1,000,000.00
$3,539.50 for the first $1,000,000 plus $2.00 for
each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof.
$40.00
$56.00
$40.00 /hr
Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated
Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revision to
approved plans (1/2 hr min)
NOTES:
I. Valuations for determination of permit fees will be based on contract prices or, in the absence of a contract price, the Building
Valuation Data as published, by I.C.B.O. Building Standards
II. Plan review fees (residential non - engineered) will be 50% of the building permit fee, and plan review fees (residential
engineered) will be 20% of the building permit fee
III. Plan review fees (commercial) will be 65% of the building permit fee
Driveway permit fee (15.26) (no tee when included w /bldg permit)
R.O.W. permit for driveway access
Appeals and Exceptions (15.44)
PLUMBING PERMIT FEES
Permit issuance
Single family and duplexes:
New residential single family
New duplex
Additional plumbing, remodeling
All other plumbing work
Plus the following additional charges:
for each plumbing fixture
for each gas outlet
for each water heater & hot water boiler (per 1.000 btu)
for automatic sprinkler systems (per head)
for plumbing alteration work (per outlet)
ELECTRIC PERMIT FEES
A. The following schedule of fees shall apply to all electrical work for which a permit is required
For new construction of electrical work:
Single family and duplexes:
For temporary work service permit
For residential single family - new
For duplex - new
For additional wiring, remodeling
All other electrical work
For issuance of permit
For each fixture /duplex outlet/individual switch /emergency light
For electric heat per k.w. installed
For each power outlet
For electrical service to 200 amps
For electrical service over 200 amps
For each area floodlight, 1st light
For each additional floodlight
For generator per k.w. output
For transformers 5 k.v.a. or above
For motor connections, 15 hp and above
For transfer switches - manual
For transfer switches - automatic
For electrical signs
For trailer courts (each space)
Each additional (same permit)
For temporary services
For environmental control devices per outlet/unit
B. The following schedule of fees shall apply to all electrical work for which a plan review is required
$0 - 500
$501 - 1,000
$1,001 - 2
$2,001 - 3,000
$3,001 - 4,000
$4,001 - 6,000
$6,001 - up
$40.00 /hr
$40.00 /hr
$15.00
$50.00
$150.00
$70.00
$100.00
$30.00
$35.00
$7.00
$5.00
$0.20
$1.50
$7.00
$30.00
$70.00
$100.00
$30.00
$35.00
$1.25
$1.00
$2.00
$20.00
$30.00
$20.00
$5.00
$1.00
$5.00
$20.00
$5.00
$10.00
$20.00
$50.00
$10.00
$5.00
$1.25
$35.00
$60.00
$100.00
$150.00
$200.00
$250.00
$300.00
C. When extra inspections are made necessary by reason of defective work, or otherwise through fault or error on the part of the
holder of the permit, or on the part of the permit holder's official setting forth the violation, only one such extra inspection shall be
made under the regular fees as herein prescribed. For each further extra inspection for which the holder of the permit or
employee is entirely responsible, fees shall be charged as follows:
First inspection $40.00
Second inspection $50.00
Each additional inspection $60.00
D. The building department shall allow for correction of such work, a maximum of ten working days following the date of
inspection
SOLID WASTE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL RATES
A. Solid Waste Disposal fees at the landfill site:
1 a. Residential garbage from a passenger automobile or pickup truck,
up to 500 lbs. no charge
1 b. Residential garbage 501 lbs or greater $10.00 minimum
2a. Construction /Demolition debris, separated $46.00/ton, $20.00 min.
2b. Commercial wastes and mixed construction /demolition
( residentiaVcommerciaVindustrial /institutional) debris. Any mixed
construction Toads that have greater than 10% metals will not be
accepted. $70.00 /ton, $20.00 min.
2c. Construction /Demolition roofing material - shingles & tar paper $70.00/ton
3a. Garbage truck of borough collection contractor per contract
3b. Garbage truck of United States Coast Guard contractor $95.00/ton
4. Asbestos disposal (Over 10 c.y. - price to be negotiated with Borough
Manager) $135.00/cy, $135.00 min
5a. Lead acid batteries - residential no charge
5b. Lead acid batteries - commercial $6.00 per large, $3.00 per small
6. Sludge disposal $60.00 /ton
7. House trailers (measured per trailer's longest dimension) $18.00 /I1
8a. Metals and automobiles - residential $75.00/ton
8b. Metals and automobiles - commercial $216.00 /ton
8c. Refrigerators $20.00 per
8d. Other Appliances $10.00 per
9a. Tires - commercial $70.00/ton, $32.00 minimum
9b. Tires - residential $2.00 /tire
10a. Fishing gear - commercial, line & web only $46.00 /ton
10b.Fishing gear - residential - line & web, up to 500 lbs. no charge
10c. Fishing gear - residential - line & web, 501 lbs. and greater $46.00 /ton
11 a. Used oil - residential no charge
11b. Used oil - commercial $3.00/gal
12a. Incineration of medicaVinfectious waste - under 10 pounds $20.00
12b. Incineration of medicaVinfectious waste - 10 pound and over. $20.00 + $1.00 per pound over 10 pounds
12c. Incineration of medical/infectious waste - Hospital only. $20.00 + .75 per pound over 10 pounds
13a. Incineration of animals - euthanized
$1.00 /Ib, $10.00 minimum
13b. Incineration of animals - cremation (up to 200 pounds); separated in
incinerator unit, but not always the only animal in the unit. $200.00
13c. Incineration of animals - individuaLprivate cremations $250.00
14. Incineration of foreign vessel waste (kitchen waste)
15. Household Hazardous Waste
16. Use of scale to obtain a certified weight
B. Solid Waste Collection Fees:
1. Weekly residential door to door collection service (per month, inside city)
2. Residential collection service (per month, outside city)
3. Residential carry out service in addition to the charge for regular
residential service
4. Senior citizen residential rates are 75% of those listed above
5. Vacancy rate, per month
6. Lien tee
7. Late fees
8. Commercial and residential dumpster service:
Kodiak fee per tip
2.0 cu yds
$50.00 + $1.00 per pound over 10Ibs.
No charge
$10.00 /ticket
$31.00
$31.00
$17.50
$23 25
$10.00
$50.00
1 %for each class of service plus $1.00
$22.00
2.6 cu yds
3.0 cu yds
3.6 cu yds
4.0 cu yds
5.0 cu yds
5.5 cu yds
6.0 cu yds
15.0 cu yds
20.0 cu yds
Kodiak fee per month
2.0 cu yds
2.6 cu yds
3.0 cu yds
3.6 cu yds
4.0 cu yds
5.0 cu yds
5.5 cu yds
6.0 cu yds
15.0 cu yds
20.0 cu yds
Beyond Salonie Creek fee per tip
2.0 cu yds
2.6 cu yds
3.0 cu yds
3.6 cu yds
4.0 cu yds
5.0 cu yds
5.5 cu yds
6.0 cu yds
15.0 cu yds
20.0 cu yds
Beyond Salonie Creek fee per month
2.0 cu yds
2.6 cu yds
3.0 cu yds
3.6 cu yds
4.0 cu yds
5.0 cu yds
5.5 cu yds
6.0 cu yds
15.0 cu yds
20.0 cu yds
Bear proof dumpster - rent
Bear proof dumpster - per tip
Locking lids for dumpsters (per month)
The charge for commercial dumpster service which compacts materials is one and one -half times the standard rate
$28.00
$36.00
$38.00
$47.00
$50.00
$52.00
$61.00
$245.00
$270.00
$27.38
$27.38
$29.00
$29.00
$34.00
$37.53
$37.53
$56.00
$112.00
$134.00
$29.00
$32.00
$41.00
$41.00
$52.00
$53.00
$56.00
$67.00
$355.00
$381.00
$33.00
$33.00
$35.00
$34.00
$40.00
$40.00
$40.00
$67.00
$207.00
$207.00
$63.66
$23 13
$15.00
$37.00
9. Commercial Can Service and Home Business (one pickup of 4 bags
or 4 cans per week) $37.00
10. Governmental customers will be served by a private company by direct negotiation for service. Fees will be set, billed and
collected by that company
11. Temporary dumpster delivery/pickup fee (tip fees will be charged
according to rate schedule) $40.00
12. A deposit may be charged for a dumpster of up to two (2) times the monthly rental
C. Every residential unit will be charged for solid waste collection services. Residential units within the City of Kodiak will be billed
by the City with their utility bills.
D. Commercial and residential solid waste materials collected by the United States Coast Guard, or its representative, for
disposal at the Kodiak Island Borough landfill will be charged at the time of disposal at the rate established in item A.3. of this fee
schedule. The Kodiak Island Borough will invoice the United States Coast Guard for all or any portion of those fees charged, as
agreed upon by the parties. Fees associated with other waste disposal options will be charged based on the applicable fee
represented in this schedule.
E. Dumping commercial waste in residential dumpsters or other business's dumpsters without written permission will result in a
$300.00 fine for the first offense and a $1,000.00 fine for the second and subsequent offenses.
F. Dumping metals, used oil, bilge water, epoxy paint or other hazardous waste items in a commercial or residential dumpster will
result in a $300 fine for the first offense and a $1,000 fine for the second and subsequent offenses.
G For all construction and demolition projects there will be a deposit of $250 minimum for projects up to 249 square feet, $500
minimum for projects 249 to 500 square feet and $1000 minimum for projects 501 square feet and above. This deposit will be
paid in full upon application for a zoning permit and no building permit will be issued without proof of payment. A deposit is also
required for projects that do not require a zoning compliance or building permit (e.g. demolition/remodeling projects such as
roofing and siding). A bill will be generated and sent to the client on a monthly basis until verification is received that the project is
complete and the dumpster has been removed. If a positive deposit balance remains after verification is received and the
dumpster has been removed this remainder amount will be retumed to the client.
H. Companies conducting commercial, industrial and institutional demolition projects need to separate their waste into metal and
non -metal loads. Mixed loads will not be accepted at the landfill.
I. Metals received at the landfill in the form of tanks or cables must be prepared in an acceptable manner. Tanks must be drained
of all fluids and wiped clean. Tanks under 500 gallons must have an 18' square hole cut into it and wiped clean. Tanks over 500
gallons must have one end cut off and wiped clean Tanks 1000 gallons and greater must contact Engineering/Facility staff to
discuss acceptable criteria. Fishing cable must be cut into 3' lengths. Other metal items must be cut into pieces no greater than
17' long, 7 wide and 5' high. They must be separated from non -metal material (e.g., machinery with hoses or electrical
components).
J. Non - profit organizations will be allowed free disposal of household residential waste up to 1000 lbs/week. Disposal of large
items (e.g., boats, trailers, construction /demolition debris and metals) will be charged at the same rate as shown in this fee
schedule
K. Commercial establishments, and/or small quantity generators, who generate hazardous waste must contact an environmental
company to properly dispose of their waste.
L. Commercial establishments which dispose of construction and or demolition waste into dumpsters which are not designated for
such use (i.e., public dumpsters, commercial dumpsters) will be charged at the same rate as shown in this fee schedule. An
estimate of waste generated will be obtained from building or zoning permit information. If this information is not available a field
estimate will be made.
Definitions:
Residential waste - Waste generated from your home (for example, household garbage, bulky items such as fumishings and
grass/lawn clippings). It excludes construction /demolition waste.
Commercial waste - Institutional and industrial organizations or contractors and businesses conducting work for compensation
and/or barter.
TO: Assembly Members
From. Nancy Wells
Re: Letter to DNR
I hope that the majority of the Assembly will agree and send a letter to DNR regarding
AADC as we were requested last Thursday evening by the gentleman from DNR.
Points that I believe should be included:
1) Thank you for attending the meeting in Kodiak;
2) statement that we appreciate DNR's diligence in fulfilling their obligation to
administrate public lands;
3) Statement that the KIB Assembly resolution provided by KIB regarding the
AADC request for control of the additional acreage did and still expresses the
sentiment and interest of the KIB.
4) If the DNR decision regarding granting the additional acreage control remains in
effect than DNR's decision that closure of the Narrow Cape public lands should
be reviewed on the basis of each rocket launch this in effect mirrors the current
FAA and USCG requirements for a request for each individual launch. Both of
those agencies issue a narrow window of launch time. AADC's difficulty with
having a similar requirement for DNR simply makes no sense. Sending 3 faxes
instead of two, shouldn't be so taxing.
5) That we request DNR require AADC to provide a copy of the visual sight security
guidelines for DOD MDA launches and a written analysis of how this is being
applied to the KLC, in order to establish whether the 14,000 acre request is
excessive and that this analysis be made available to the AADC advisory board
and general public.
6) That DNR request AADC to provide the policies and procedures which AADC is
employing related to restricting access during launch campaigns, and that same be
submitted to the state Attorney General's Office to review for legality and
protection of citizen's civil rights. I think we need to mention the concern of
AADC current practice, as stated by Mr. Ladner, of stopping vehicles and noting
license tags & occupants, PRIOR to the closures.
In all fairness I think a copy of this letter should be sent to AADC and the University.
Please note, I would support the land transfer to the University with several stipulations,
KIB first right of refusal to any and all acreage, on site UA land management presence,
historic easement and use provisions, etc.
KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH
CLERICS OFFICE
COPIED TO:
ASSEMBLY / MAYOR
MANAGER... ,/, OTHER
jn12 (.e .09
?4i( Zoo > 1
DRAFT DNR Letter
Rick Thompson, Director
Dear Mr. Thompson:
Thank you for coming to Kodiak for our work session on A.A.D.C. and land matters.
Now that you folks have granted A.A.D.C. security control over the large area during the
launch windows, we expect you to continue to monitor the impact of these closures on
the community. We expect you to work with AADC to look at reducing the size of the
area and minimize the length of time that the windows close the area to this community.
We will continue to provide you with community input and we expect you to manage this
area for maximum multiple use by the many interests who use this land at various times.
You know that we oppose and will adamantly fight any further attempts to increase the
restrictions on the use of this land by the public.
Thanks again for coming to Kodiak.
Sincerely,
Jerome Selby
Mayor
DRAFT letter to AADC
Dear Chairman Hamilton:
On behalf of the Kodiak island Borough Assembly and the community, thank you and Pat Ladner
for attending our work session to discuss the AADC. We appreciate your efforts to improve
communication and look forward to Alaska Aerospace Development Corporation's (AADC)
public presentations on a quarterly basis. These briefmgs should keep the Assembly and the
public aware of AADC's activities, avoid surprises and greatly improve communication. We will
work with Pat to schedule these presentations at convenient times and would encourage all of you
to make this a priority.
As you could tell, public land access will continue to be an important issue and we encourage you
to take a close look at your requirements to see if the size of the security area can be reduced in
any way. In addition, anything that can be done to tighten the windows of restriction would be a
positive action. If we can assist in these efforts in any way, let us know.
We appreciate both your and Pat's commitment to have no interest in outright or long term
control of this additional land that Dept. of Natural Resources has granted you security control
over during the launch windows. Limiting your control to security control for launch windows
sends a positive message to the community that you have no intention to "lock up" this area in the
future. We will hold you to this commitment. This is a key community interest for everyone
because of all the other activities that take place on this land. This area is vital to long -term
access for the Kodiak community.
We also appreciate your recent efforts to work with the fishing fleet and minimize impacts to
those who are trying to make a living in the impacted area. We encourage you to continue these
efforts with the fishing industry as well as other groups that may be simultaneously impacted by
the launch windows.
These are a few of the key areas of concern for the Kodiak community. We look forward to
continued dialog on these and other issues to minimize any negative effect and maximize the
positive effects of AADC for both the community and AADC. Thank you again for attending the
Assembly Work Session on February 10.
Sincerely,
Jerome Selby
Mayor
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
CITY OF KODIAK
RESOLUTION NO.
"2 _teas'- /,
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KODIAK
SUPPORTING LEGISLATION REQUESTED BY THE ALASKA BOARD OF
FISHERIES CONCERNING ALLOCATIONS OF GULF OF ALASKA GROUNDFISH
FISHERY RESOURCES AND ALLOCATIONS OF FISHERY RESOURCES TO
FISHERMEN'S COOPERATIVES
WHEREAS, the fishing industry has requested that the North Pacific Fishery
Management Council develop a rationalization plan for the groundfish fisheries of the
Gulf of Alaska; and
WHEREAS, the City of Kodiak and the Kodiak Island Borough have adopted
resolutions in support of a Gulf of Alaska groundfish rationalization program, on the
conditions that such program provides for the long term stability and sustainability of
Kodiak Island coastal communities, and includes elements that mitigate potential
negative impacts of rationalization on Kodiak Island coastal communities;
WHEREAS, the effectiveness of any Gulf of Alaska groundfish rationalization
plan will depend on its extension into the waters of the State of Alaska and to the waters
off Alaska under Federal fishery management; and
WHEREAS, any rationalization plan implemented in Alaska's waters must
recognize the sovereignty of the State over those waters and allocations of fishing
privileges for Alaska waters must be made, if made at all, with the least possible
impingement on the clauses of the Alaska Constitution that provide "fish ... are
reserved to the people for their common use" and "laws and regulations governing the
use or disposal of natural resources must apply equally to all persons similarly situated ";
and
WHEREAS, the Alaska Board of Fisheries charged a committee to develop Gulf
groundfish rationalization alternatives for Alaska's waters, taking into account the
Constitution's "least impingement" standard, and the Board's committee formed a
steering committee of stakeholder representatives that held extensive discussions
regarding such altematives; and
WHEREAS, after extensive stakeholder discussion and debate, the Board's
committee recommended a Gulf groundfish rationalization alternative under which
fishermen could receive a temporary privilege to catch a specific portion of the
harvestable surplus of a stock of fish which would be allocated on the basis of historic
landings, and that some or all of each such fishery resource allocation would
automatically expire on a time certain basis and revert to the State for reallocation; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Fisheries has found it desirable for the Board to have
express statutory authority to allocate to cooperatives, as the Board believes that
cooperatives may be an effective means through which harvests of groundfish stocks that
straddle jurisdictional boundaries between the State of Alaska and the Federal
government could be coordinated; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Fisheries does not currently have express statutory
authority to allocate fishery resources in proportion to historic landings, or to allocate
fishery resources to cooperatives; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Fisheries has therefore charged its Gulf Groundfish
Rationalization Committee with advocating the adoption of legislation that would provide
the Board of Fisheries and/or the Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission, or a
combination of the two, with express authority to allocate Gulf of Alaska groundfish
fishery resources, and only Gulf groundfish fishery resources, to skippers, crew members,
vessel owners or other entities, as deemed appropriate, on the basis of historic landings;
and
WHEREAS, the Board of Fisheries has charged its committee with advocating the
adoption of legislation that would provide the Board with express authority to allocate
fishery resources to cooperatives; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Fisheries has traditionally promoted the interests of
Alaska's fishermen and fishing communities, and has specifically taken steps to promote
access to the Gulf's Pacific cod resources for fishermen of the Gulf's coastal
communities; and
WHEREAS, any allocation measure ultimately pursued by the Board of Fisheries
would be developed through the Board's public process, and would in any case be subject
to the Alaska Constitution's "least possible impingement" standard; and
WHEREAS providing the Board of Fisheries with such authority would facilitate
adoption of a Gulf of Alaska groundfish rationalization favorable to the interests of the
Kodiak Island fishing community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Kodiak,
Alaska, that the Governor of the State of Alaska is encouraged to support and the Alaska
State Legislature is encouraged to adopt legislation that authorizes the Alaska Board of
Fisheries or the Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission, or the two of them in
combination, to:
Section 1. Allocate Gulf of Alaska groundfish fishery resources, and only Gulf of
Alaska groundfish resources, to skippers, crewmembers, vessel owners or some
combination of them, on the basis of historical landings.
Section 2. Allocate fishery resources to fishermen's cooperatives.
Kodiak Island road - accessible trails:
A survey of residents and trail enthusiasts
Prepared for
Kodiak Island Borough
Community Development Department
710 Mill Bay Road • Kodiak, Alaska 99615
Prepared by
Doug Whittaker, Ph.D.
Confluence Research and Consulting
6324 Red Tree Circle • Anchorage, Alaska 99507
August 2004
Executive Summary
This report provides results from a survey of Kodiak Island residents and trail enthusiasts
about Kodiaks' road - accessible trails. Study objectives for both the "general public" and
"trail enthusiast" surveys included:
• Socio- demographic characteristics of trail users and non -users
• Trail activity participation and relative amount of use.
• Annual economic expenditures related to trail activity
• General trail improvement priorities & locations
Additional study objectives for the "trail enthusiast" survey included:
• Favorite trails for key activities
• Use of specific trails
• Priority actions for specific trails
The general public sample came from Kodiak Island Borough tax rolls and a
proportional -to- population sample from USCG base residents. The enthusiast sample
carne from self - selected volunteers recruited by networking and public service
announcements in the community. The general public sample (n =508) had a 48%
response rate with a three reminder mail survey protocol. The enthusiast sample (n =163)
had a 55% response rate with no reminders; there was an overlap of 20 people in both
sarnples (self - selected enthusiasts who were randomly chosen in the general sample).
Socio- demographic profiles of the general public and enthusiasts show few differences,
although enthusiasts were slightly younger and more likely to be males. Compared to
Census data, the general public sample had higher education and income levels, but were
otherwise similar to the Island's population. About 13% of our sample (n =66) reported
that they never use Kodiak Island road - accessible trails, and they tended to be slightly
older than trail users. Differences between USCG and non -base residents, motorized and
non - motorized users, and people with different lengths of residency were also explored;
motorized /non- motorized differences were generally more pronounced.
In general, Kodiak has higher trail participation rates than comparable populations in
Anchorage, the state of Alaska, or nationwide. Enthusiasts showed higher participation
rates than the general public; however, the rank -order of activities was roughly similar for
both sarnples. Trails used for fishing and hunting have higher participation rates in
Kodiak than in Alaska, and much higher rates than the nation as a whole. However,
Kodiak's winter activity participation is generally lower than in Anchorage and Alaska
statewide (although higher than national rates). The most popular activities are hiking -
based and occur in sumrner. ORV /motor bike use is the other relatively popular activity,
with about a third of ORV users reporting they ride several times a week.
Both trail users and non -trail users provided information about barriers to trail use.
Enthusiasts reported several reasons beyond the control of management, although better
information about trail opportunities might encourage more trail use among some.
Enthusiasts provided additional information about their favorite activities and trails.
Kodiak Island road - accessible trails: Survey of residents and trail enthusiasts
Respondents were asked to estimate trails - related expenditures to broadly estimate the
magnitude of economic activity associated with trail recreation on Kodiak Island (this
information, however, does not provide economic impact infonnation nor address several
other types of economic value of the Kodiak trail system). Taking all the categories of
expenditures together suggests there may be over 6 million dollars spent on trail - related
activities over the course of a year (4.9 million on food and basic expenditures, 0.9
million on road vehicle mileage and maintenance, and 0.6 million on purchases of ORVs,
snowmachines, or horses). Using Census figures for median incomes and number of
households, 6 million spent on trail recreation is about 3% of what people earn. It is
beyond the scope of this study to estimate the precision of this type of calculation, but it
seems reasonable from an intuitive perspective.
A major goal of the study was to assess residents' priorities for trail system
improvements. All respondents were asked about the overall emphasis of improvements
(local vs. tourism - development) and to prioritize 26 different potential trail improvement
actions. Results show much greater interest in improvements for local users than for
tourism - development, which is not surprising given that the sample was entirely made up
of local residents. However, about a third of respondents were interested in a "balanced"
approach that considered both local and tourism needs.
There was general support for all 14 improvement actions, and no action was opposed
( "do not do this ") by a majority in either the general public or enthusiast samples. Five
actions were a medium or high priority for a majority of respondents: major trail re-
routes, garbage cans at trailheads, trailhead information kiosks, new bridges at stream
crossings, and improved trailhead parking areas. The same actions and rank order were
evident in both public and enthusiast samples. Developing campsites and public use
cabins was a lower priority than some large scale improvements on the trails themselves
(major re- routes, bridges), but they had a similar priority to other "on-the-trails"
improvements (trail surfacing, improved access for people with disabilities, improved
signs and markers, rest areas with benches). Three of the five highest ranked actions
were associated with trailhead improvements. This is significant because trailhead /pull-
out enhancements may be developable during road construction projects, offering an
alternative trails system funding source for these types of actions.
There was also general support for all 12 of the programmatic actions, with only one
action opposed ( "do not do this ") by more than a quarter of either sample (trail patrols for
law enforcement). Two program actions were rated a high or medium priority by over
three - quarters of the general public (with higher support among enthusiasts):
development of a map and guidebook and the "adopt -a- trail" program featuring volunteer
clean -up efforts. These are obvious candidates for priority actions in any eventual plan.
Eight other programmatic actions were rated a medium or high priority by a majority of
the general public, including a volunteer program, a trail crew program, creation of a trail
fund- raising program, trail etiquette and safety programs, and creation of some separate
motorized and non - motorized trails. In general, more programmatic actions received
majority support (10 of 12) than trail development /improvement actions (5 of 14).
Kodiak Island road - accessible trails: Survey of residents and trail enthusiasts
ii
There were some priority differences between motorized and non - motorized users in the
general public sample. Data show that while these differences are statistically significant,
they are generally not substantial (the two groups still have similar ranked- ordered
priorities). The exceptions are priorities for creating separate trails for motorized and
non - motorized users. For these actions, a majority of non- motorized users reported a
medium or high priority, while just under a majority reported the same among motorized
users. Results also show greater polarization on these issues in the enthusiast sample
than in the general public sample.
g Respondents were also asked to prioritize locations for trail system improvements. Three
areas consistently received more "votes" for many actions: the Kodiak urban trails, the
Monashka area, and the Middle Bay / Saltery / Miam Lake area. The first two make
sense because they are closer to town where most people live and work, and the third is
the highest use area for ORV advocates (who make up about half of the enthusiast
sample). Trails in these areas probably deserve closer attention in trail planning,
although this should not be the only input into choosing projects. Trail users appear to
recognize that developing camps or public use cabins makes more sense in more remote
areas (Anton Larsen Bay, Chiniak, Pasagshak) compared to closer -in areas.
Enthusiasts were asked to report candidate trails for specific trail improvement actions,
including building new bridges, addressing erosion, grade, wetlands, trail surfacing, or
trail marking issues, as well as locations for public use cabins and campsite development.
Results show that in most cases, "close -in trails" (those nearer to downtown) receive
majority support from non - motorized users, while more remote trails receive primary
support from motorized users. The exceptions are for campsite and public use cabin
development, where both groups were more likely to report more remote trails.
Nearly 40 comments were made by the general public about motorized/non- motorized
use issues, which is many more than for any other issue. A similar number were
provided by enthusiasts. A final section of the document reviews previous conflict
research findings and discusses issues suggested by the comments. Ultimately, long -
lasting, successful solutions to these conflicts will probably require extended discussions
with stakeholder groups, and may need to offer a diversity of improved ORV trails or
riding areas in trade for some designated non - motorized trails or areas. Stakeholder
groups are clearly more polarized on these issues than the general trail -using public, but
open discussions may help lead negotiated solutions acceptable to all.
Kodiak Island road - accessible trails: Survey of residents and trail enthusiasts
Description Spatial Attributes
Attractions
Personal GeoDatabase Feature Class
Page 1 of 2
Keywords
Theme: Trails, Trailheads
Description
Abstract
This dataset delineates the location and types of attractions along Kodiak trails. These
attractions are features that were identified in the field survey as potential draws for trail
users.
Purpose
The Kodiak Island Borough commissioned a trail geodatabase to provide information useful to
their ongoing 2004 Trails and Open Space plan. This layer accompanies the mapping of trail
locations and is intended to assist the Borough in making informed decisions regarding current
trail use and in planning for future use.
Status of the data
Complete
Data update frequency: Unknown
Time period for which the data is relevant
Date and time: 2004
Description:
ground condition
Publication Information
Who created the data: Kodiak Island Borough
Date and time: 2004
Data storage and access information
File name: Attractions
Type of data: vector digital data
Location of the data:
• \ \Sparrow \gis \1 Projects \AMS Final Deliverables \Kodiak_Trails.mdb
Data processing environment: ESRI ArcCatalog 9.0.0.535
Constraints on accessing and using the data
file: / /C:\ Documents %20and %20Settings \ldemi\ Local %20Settings \Temp\metadata0.htm 2/24/2005
Access constraints: None
Use constraints:
None
Details about this document
Contents last updated: 20050224 at time 08373300
Who completed this document
Kodiak Island Borough
mailing and physical address:
710 Mill Bay Road
Kodiak, AK 99615
USA
Standards used to create this document
Standard name: FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata
Standard version: FGDC- STD - 001 -1998
Time convention used in this document: local time
Metadata profiles defining additonal information
• ESRI Metadata Profile: http:// www. esri .com /metadata /esriprof80.html
Page 2 of 2
file: / /C:\ Documents %20and %20Settings \ldemi\ Local %20Settings \Temp\metadata0.htm 2/24/2005
0
w
m
Wlo
W m
N N
co W
o
0
N
K
0
0 ,
0
O
O _
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Z
0
0
N
0
N_
O
j_
0
O 0
N O
I
D
0
0 .'o
co o
O 5,
0
Co
0
A
0
0
m
O
m
8
m
O
0
O
O
O
O
O
0
0
O
0
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
to
N
Description Spatial Attributes
Keywords
Theme: Trails, Bridges
Description
Abstract
This dataset delineates the location and condition of bridges on trails in Kodiak.
Purpose
The Kodiak Island Borough commissioned this database to provide information useful to their
ongoing 2004 Trails and Open Space plan. Before this dataset was created there was no
complete and accurate mapping of Kodiak trails. This dataset compliments a 2004 survey of
trail use and will enable to Borough to make informed decisions regarding the current location
and condition of trails.
Status of the data
Complete
Data update frequency: Unknown
Time period for which the data is relevant
Date and time: 2004
Description:
ground condition
Publication Information
Who created the data: Kodiak Island Borough
Date and time: 2004
Bridges
Personal GeoDatabase Feature Class
Data storage and access information
File name: Bridges
Type of data: vector digital data
Location of the data:
• \ \Sparrow \gis \1 Projects \AMS Final Deliverables \Kodiak_Trails.mdb
Data processing environment: ESRI ArcCatalog 9.0.0.535
Constraints on accessing and using the data
Access constraints: None
Page 1 of 2
file: / /C:\ Documents %20and %20Settings \ldemi\ Local %20Settings \Temp\metadatal.htm 2/24/2005
Use constraints:
None
Details about this document
Contents last updated: 20050224 at time 08555700
Who completed this document
Kodiak Island Borough
mailing and physical address:
710 Mill Bay Road
Kodiak, AK 99615
USA
Standards used to create this document
Standard name: FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata
Standard version: FGDC- STD - 001 -1998
Time convention used in this document: local time
Metadata profiles defining additonal information
ESRI Metadata Profile: http:// www. esri .com /metadata /esriprof80.html
Page 2 of 2
file: / /C:\ Documents %20and %20Settings \ldemi\ Local %20Settings \Temp\metadatal.htm 2/24/2005
Description Spatial
Keywords
Theme: Trails, Fords
Status of the data
Complete
Data update frequency: Unknown
Time period for which the data is relevant
Date and time: 2004
Description:
ground condition
Publication Information
Who created the data: Kodiak Island Borough
Date and time: 2004
Fords
Personal Geo Database Feature Class
Attributes
Description
Abstract
This dataset delineates the location and characteristics of fords along trails in Kodiak.
Purpose
The Kodiak Island Borough commissioned this database to provide information useful to their
ongoing 2004 Trails and Open Space plan. Before this dataset was created there was no
complete and accurate mapping of Kodiak trails. This dataset compliments a 2004 survey of
trail use and will enable to Borough to make informed decisions regarding the current location
and condition of trails.
Data storage and access information
File name: Fords
Type of data: vector digital data
Location of the data:
• \ \Sparrow \gis \1 Projects \AMS Final Deliverables \Kodiak_Trails.mdb
Data processing environment: Microsoft Windows 2000 Version 5.0 (Build 2195) Service Pack 3;
ESRI ArcCatalog 9.0.0.535
Constraints on accessing and using the data
Page 1 of 2
file: / /C:\ Documents %20and %20Settings \ldemi\ Local %20Settings \Temp\metadata2.htm 2/24/2005
Access constraints: None
Use constraints:
None
Details about this document
Contents last updated: 20050224 at time 09355300
Who completed this document
Kodiak Island Borough
mailing and physical address:
710 Mill Bay Road
Kodiak, AK 99615
USA
Standards used to create this document
Standard name: FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata
Standard version: FGDC- STD - 001 -1998
Time convention used in this document: local time
Metadata profiles defining additonal information
• ESRI Metadata Profile: http:// www. esri .com /metadata /esriprof
Page 2 of 2
file: / /C:\ Documents %20and %20Settings \Idemi\ Local %20Settings \Temp\metadata2.htm 2/24/2005
- .I
- 4 W
N-
1
O N mIQ 0
N
A
61
62
-- 58
_ _ 591
60
NN
+O
I
OBJECTID1
48
00000001
CO
_ 8
15
35
8
N
00
201
201
00 0 j1
0
0 0 010
00
Widll
8
N
G
O O 0
O
o
o
D
O
O
1.00000000000
0.50000000000
+
0
O
O
0
o
O
Depth Feet
1.00000000000
2
0
2 8,
2 2
�i
0
N
!
i
o
s
N
Bed Mated
Rocks
1 1
i
Notes
2
_ 85.97800000000
11.84900000000
10.80400000000
14.63900000000
- 2.50000000000
12.85300000000
-0.81300000000
1.34200000000
1 00V VIlVVVVVVVV
J
+
o.
N
4
O mal
t W
( 07
p + q� O
O
0 Win,
A O I
N
O W
N
N
N
167.85500000000
177.71800000000
OAA,Ignnnnnnnn
Elevation
117.45400000000
+
N
01N2/921
0
0 CO
0
0
O0
O
IIN N
0
J J
'41'4
0
0
o
0
O
V J.
N O
N
.0
00
O
0
O
N
O
O
0
O
2.80000000000
2.40000000000
-- - ' onnnnnnnnnn
Max PDOP
2.80000000000
Differential
Differential
Differential
Differential
Differential
Differential
Differential
Differential
b
0 CO
m m
u
01
ti
0 m
0 010
Cu 03
I
00
m m
0 CD
CD CO CD IW
1 1
11
N
0
0
m m m
0 0 0
IV 10 u °
00
2
0
1810
R
0
Differential
Differential
nos- ranrxi
Corr Type
Differential
RIk
X
H
Ci
0
X
titi-
l
1
l
0 0
X X
I-1-1
0 0
X X
-iti
0
X
1
1
N
0
GeoXT
eoX 8/11/2004
GeoXT 8/11/2004
0
-I
R0
0 0
X X
- I-I
m
N N
0 0
A A>➢>
Oflflf
4�
0 0
X X
-
m>n
N N
0 0
0 0
X X
I-IH-
1 Z
N N
0 0
A
0 0
X X
I,ti-
1
l
m m
0
AIA>>
0 0
X X
II -1-I
I
21 c°
0 0
g1g'
0 0 0
X X
-i
I
c+2
0 0
A>
1G)
0
X
-I
Z
0
>O
0
X
-I
N
0
GeoXT 8/11 /2004
GeeXT 8/11/2004
no
C.nXT 8 I11/2004
Rcvr Type GPS Date
GeoXT 8/11 /2004
0
4O
N
0 0 e 0
AP
R00�C
N N N
0 0 0
A> AI>
R081109A.cor
R081109A.cor
R081109A.cor
R081109A.cor
R081109A.cor
R081109A.cor
6081109A.c0r
R0B1109A.cor
--- - rd
A A
0 m
o O
DDDDDDDDDDDDDD
o
A A
0 0
O O
8 81S
A A
0 0(0
O ojo
io
L
A A
0
O
o 9.
A A
0 0
O o
^
0 00600
A A
0 m
O O
A1A
m
O
0
O
R081109A.cor _
12081109A.cor_
6081109A.cor
Datable
R081109A.cor _4
0.90000000000
1.10000000000
0.70000000000
0.90000000000
0.70000000000
0.60000000000
0.60000000000
0.60000000000
1.20000000000
I
00
O
I
0 0
+ +I
;1800
O O
0.0
818
S:o
I°IO
!
' 011100118 1 $
+ I -••
olo
0 0; 0 0
0 0
010,18118
1
0O— Ol0
p O ic
8
0(0
0 0 0 0
0 0
I I
l
I 1
+.
i
l
.
0.90000000000 0.60000000000
0.80000000000 0.50000000000
Vert Prec _ _ �ROrz_Prec
0.60000000000
--- 0.70000000000
0.50000000000
0.50000000000
0.50000000000
0.40000000000
_ 0.50000000000
0.30000000000
C__ . 1100000000001
Description Spatial Attributes
Keywords
Theme: Trails, Impacted Areas
Description
Abstract
This dataset maps locations of areas of user impacts along trails in the Kodiak area. These
areas are generally mudholes or extremely braided areas of trail.
Purpose
This feature class is a part of a trail geodatabase comissioned by the Kodiak Island Borough in
2004 to support their ongoing Trails and Open Space planning process.
Status of the data
Complete
Data update frequency: Unknown
1
Time period for which the data is relevant
Date and time: 2004
Description:
ground condition
Publication Information
Who created the data: Kodiak Island Borough
Date and time: 2004
Impacted_Areas
Personal GeoDatabase Feature Class
Data storage and access information
File name: Impacted_Areas
Type of data: vector digital data
Location of the data:
• \ \Sparrow \gis \1 Projects \AMS Final Deliverables \Kodiak_Trails.mdb
Data processing environment: Microsoft Windows 2000 Version 5.0 (Build 2195) Service Pack 3;
ESRI ArcCatalog 9.0.0.535
Constraints on accessing and using the data
Access constraints: None
Use constraints:
Page 1 of 2
file: / /C:\ Documents %20and %20Settings \ldemi\ Local %20Settings \Temp\metadata3.htm 2/24/2005
None
Details about this document
Contents last updated: 20050224 at time 09365000
Who completed this document
Kodiak Island Borough
mailing and physical address:
710 Mill Bay Road
Kodiak, AK 99615
USA
Standards used to create this document
Standard name: FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata
Standard version: FGDC- STD - 001 -1998
Time convention used in this document: local time
Metadata profiles defining additonal information
• ESRI Metadata Profile:
http
://www.esri.com/metadata/esriprof80.html
Page 2 of 2
file: / /C:\ Documents %20and %20Settings \ldemi\ Local %20Settings \Temp\metadata3.htm 2/24/2005
GO
n
d
a.
N
0
O
O
O
0
8
8
0
C)
0
0
CO
m
0
-4
O
3
a
0
a
r
d
co
co
m
x
m
F.
a
m
0
e.
r d
m g
8
0
0
8
0
8
0
b
8
0
8
8
0
0
0
d
a
0
0
a
00
•
m
m
8
•
a
0
m
8
v
N
0
d'
0
d
m
d
3
a
0 0
2
0
0 I l
0 a
0
o
0
0
0
8
Theme: Trails, Landmarks
Status of the data
Complete
Data update frequency: Unknown
Description Spatial Attributes
Keywords
Purpose
This feature class is a part of a trail geodatabase comissioned by the Kodiak Island Borough in
2004 to support their ongoing Trails and Open Space planning process.
Landmarks
Personal GeoDatabase Feature Class
Description
Abstract
This dataset delineates the location and types of landmarks along Kodiak trails.
Time period for which the data is relevant
Date and time: 2004
Description:
ground condition
Publication Information
Who created the data: Kodiak Island Borough
Date and time: 2004
Data storage and access information
File name: Landmarks
Type of data: vector digital data
Location of the data:
• \ \Sparrow \gis \1 Projects \AMS Final Deliverables \Kodiak_Trails.mdb
Data processing environment: Microsoft Windows 2000 Version 5.0 (Build 2195) Service Pack 3;
ESRI ArcCatalog 9.0.0.535
Constraints on accessing and using the data
Access constraints: None
Use constraints:
None
file: / /C:\ Documents %20and %20SettingsVdemi\ Local % \Temp\metadata
Page 1 of 2
2/24/2005
Details about this document
Contents last updated: 20050224 at time 09371300
Who completed this document
Kodiak Island Borough
mailing and physical address:
710 Mill Bay Road
Kodiak, AK 99615
USA
Standards used to create this document
Standard name: FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata
Standard version: FGDC- STD - 001 -1998
Time convention used in this document: local time
Metadata profiles defining additonal information
• ESRI
Metadata Profile: http:// www. esri .com /metadata /esriprof8
Page 2 of 2
file: / /C:\ Documents %20and %20Settings \ldemi\ Local %20Settings \Temp\metadata4.htm 2/24/2005
0 N
0 0
co
N
0 m
B w
m
m
N
W
O
O
O
O
O
J
d
0
0
X
CO
N
A
O
CO
co
0
O
O
O
0
O
O
O
in
O
0
0
co
0
N
m
'co
co
O
O
O
O
J
m
0
CO
70
O
m
co
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
0
O
O
0
O O
010
4)
J Q1
C .
as
co 5
o (0
O
J
ND
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
-4
O
O
0
0
0
v
CD
0
J
m
co
A
co
m
D
0
O
O
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
W_
O
0
0
0
0
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
O
00
m m
0
J
w
0
0
X
0,
0
O
m
D
8
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
CD
J
O
t0
W
0
J
m
0
-
N
0
A
O
m
co
8
O
O
O
O
O
N
m
J
N
A
N
A
NJ
0
0
0
0
0
N
o cm
O O
O co
o O O
o O
O o
c0
00
m m
J
N
V
0
N
W
N
OD
O
0
O
0
O
0
J
m 0)
0 0
O o
1 -1
mm
N N
0 0
A
m
D
0
O
A
O
m
D
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
co
0
0
N
O
0
0
O
O
N
-4
0
O
0
O
a
CO
O
N
N
J
a
0
0
u0
CC 05
0
r 0
0
V
O
0
m
O
0
0
0
O
N
0
0
0
0
O
v0
CD m
0
J J
CO 0)
m
N N
0 A
A
O O
OD m
0 D
0 0 0
O
0
0
0
0
0
O
O
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 O O
0 O O
e-� 00 0 Oi
N
A W
005
0 0
V
N
co
0
O
O
O
O
m
0
m
0
J
m
0
o
—1
O
A
O
m
D
8
O
O
0
O
O
N
m _
m
N
0
0
0
0
O
m
0
O
0
0
0
0 Fos
m
mm
X X
m
N
O
A
m
co
0
O
O
N
N
co
a
0
N
O
O
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
O
0
CO
m
0
0
0
0
0
7 .<
N
0
0
0
V
0
O
0
A
ti
0
0
0
d
0
O 5 m y
0 0
0 b
O ,
O
O
0
0
Description Spatial
Keywords
Theme: Trails, Photos
Attributes
Description
Abstract
This dataset shows the location of digital photographs that were taken in the course of GPS
trail mapping in Kodiak in the summer of 2004.
Purpose
This feature class is a part of a trail geodatabase comissioned by the Kodiak Island Borough in
2004 to support their ongoing Trails and Open Space planning process.
Status of the data
Complete
Data update frequency: None planned
Time period for which the data is relevant
Date and time: 2004
Description:
ground condition
Publication Information
Who created the data: Alaska Map Science
Date and time: 2004
Photo_Points
Personal GeoDatabase Feature Class
Data storage and access information
File name: Photo_Points
Type of data: vector digital data
Location of the data:
• \ \Sparrow \gis \1 Projects \AMS Final Deliverables \Kodiak_Trails.mdb
Data processing environment: ESRI ArcCatalog 9.0.0.535
Constraints on accessing and using the data
Access constraints: None
Use constraints:
None
file: / /C:\ Documents %20and %20Settings \ldemi\ Local % \Temp\metad
Page 1 of 2
2/24/2005
Details about this document
Contents last updated: 20050224 at time 09373500
Who completed this document
Kodiak Islan Borough
mailing and physical address:
710 Mill Bay Road
Kodiak, AK 99615
USA
Standards used to create this document
Standard name: FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata
Standard version: FGDC- STD - 001 -1998
Time convention used in this document: local time
Metadata profiles defining additonal information
• ESRI Metadata Profile: http:// www. esri .com /metadata /esriprof8
Page 2 of 2
file: / /C:\ Documents %20and %20Settings \ldemi\ Local %20Settings \Temp\metadata5.htm 2/24/2005
8 8 0m1
888888
88
88888
008880
N
888089
800
88188
2018888!
°"°
999W
°a
8
m N
y
^
A -i
8888
088 88
8880
888888
8
88
m
8
I Publication Information
Who created the data: Kodiak Island Borough
Date and time: 2004
Description Spatial
Keywords
Theme: Trails, Trailheads
Status of the data
Complete
Data update frequency: Unknown
Time period for which the data is relevant
Date and time: 2004
Description:
ground condition
Trailheads
Personal GeoDatabase Feature Class
Attributes
Description
Abstract
Mapping of trailheads and access points for trails along the road system in Kodiak.
Purpose
This feature class is a part of a trail geodatabase comissioned by the Kodiak Island Borough in
2004 to support their ongoing Trails and Open Space planning process.
Data storage and access information
File name: Trailheads
Type of data: vector digital data
Location of the data:
• \ \Sparrow \gis \1 Projects \AMS Final Deliverables \Kodiak_Trails.mdb
Data processing environment: ESRI ArcCatalog 9.0.0.535
Constraints on accessing and using the data
Access constraints: None
Use constraints:
None
file / /C:\ Documents %20and %20Settings \Idemi\ Local % \Temp \metadata7.htm
Page 1 of 2
2/24/2005
Details about this document
Contents last updated: 20050224 at time 09390300
Who completed this document
Kodiak Island Borough
mailing and physical address:
710 Mill Bay Road
Kodiak, AK 99615
USA
Standards used to create this document
Standard name: FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata
Standard version: FGDC- STD - 001 -1998
Time convention used in this document: local time
Metadata profiles defining additonal information
• ESRI Metadata Profile: http:// www. esri .com /metadata /esriprof80.html
Page 2 of 2
file: / /C:\ Documents% 20and% 20Settings\ ldemi\ Loca l %20Settings \Temp\metadata7.htm 2/24/2005
Z Im
u
0!
o:
m
0
Z
3
0
m
9
0
0
ti
0
2
x
o
v
2
in
Description Spatial I Attributes
Keywords
Theme: Trails
Place: Kodiak, Alaska
Status of the data
Complete
Data update frequency: Unknown
Kodiak Island Borough Trail_Segments
Personal GeoDatabase Feature Class
Description
Abstract
This dataset delineates the location and condition of trails that are accessible from the Kodiak
Island road system. Trails were mapped with differential GPS in 2004 and are generally
spatially accurate to within a few feet. Other trails exist that are not mapped, but the majority
of trails that receive use are included in this dataset.
Purpose
The Kodiak Island Borough commissioned this database to provide information useful to their
ongoing 2004 Trails and Open Space plan. Before this dataset was created there was no
complete and accurate mapping of Kodiak trails. This dataset compliments a 2004 survey of
trail use and will enable the Borough to make informed decisions regarding the current
location and condition of trails.
Time period for which the data is relevant
Date and time: 2004
Description:
ground condition
Publication Information
Who created the data: Kodiak Island Borough
Date and time: 2004
Data storage and access information
File name: Trail_Segments
Type of data: vector digital data
Location of the data:
file: / /C:\ Documents %20and %20Settings \ldemi\ Local %20Settings \Temp\metadata
Page 1 of 2
2/24/2005
• \ \Sparrow \gis \1 Projects \AMS Final Deliverables \Kodiak_Trails.mdb
Data processing environment: ESRI ArcCatalog 9.0.0.535
Constraints on accessing and using the data
Access constraints: None
Use constraints:
None
Details about this document
Contents last updated: 20050224 at time 12362900
Who completed this document
Kodiak Island Borough
mailing and physical address:
710 Mill Bay Road
Kodiak, AK 99615
USA
Standards used to create this document
Standard name: FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata
Standard version: FGDC- STD - 001 -1998
Time convention used in this document: local time
Metadata profiles defining additonal information
• ESRI Metadata Profile: http:// www. esri .com /metadata /esriprof
Page 2 of 2
file: / /C:\ Documents %20and %20Settings \ldemi\ Local %20Settings \Temp\metadata9.htm 2/24/2005
0
0
Q
0
D
0
a
DDD
22.
m
0
O.
6d
5
88 81U
888 8 88888oalINaa s
8 8888 8 888
a
=====1=> alaaxa= n>>s
N Nm000m N NNN 100000 NIN -N NNN.m .10.00
ss s sls Go s. s.ls. saa a 422
a
O
0
100
00
8;88
O
228
A
m
0 8 °0
8
m8
Dnnnnln
zzzzzz
2
0
1
0
0m
n
8
Oil
R1
1
$8°
88
8
0
z
aa as
5 =8
0_00_040
s
vE
8°
00.00
88888
nnn
55
22
a
00
➢D�
aa '
m
00
00
a
010.00
888188
as
8 1010
n
Er
B
AA
a
ecc
000
000
4
a w
co
PP
PP
ma
mx
0
8
0
0
8
D
2
1 i
0000000000001.000000
a 88 .888818 8 a
I
<I<»<>1»n 1>n!nln DDpnnn
zzzzz'zzz0zzz
a
A alr ran Fi a fl
aa.zzav
4 1 44 1 4
0
aax =
N I
00000
10
% %x
m mim
8 8
°88
8
11 i
I
8882!88
0 000000 0
080
88 8
11
2, i
' 10 ' Wvo m8 o °0
0 0 ° 88
8 S asIgaamaag
0 0 0 0 - °0 00 0
0
0
00000
-8
0
0
0
0
a
nu
bad
H .lm
I�s�II mI w l hIH
l 'MI
00100'Id' 01 ` °
10$000100 0000 010 0 0 0 0 -
� 4z 141 QQQQ
00880008n
0 .z.z . S " •zQ 0 0 0 0 00 e
�I,€10A AS'S'^? ' b'1
? 7i aaaaa Qa
81441°' _ 1 »l0
1
8
0
AmN
xa
1010 A'a
218
8
0
a
00
0
a
O
1 4
0
0
0
°°0
888
0898
818
1 1
0
O
a
8l$ 0
iE
8
tOom
tittE
881.
clEV
08" 'g
0.
O.
O'l.lm'olmmm
y -114 4
m m m
gg
OO00088a
0.
1
8 .
0
00
88
8
88
q <z
gig
a
Pica
a a as
022 a8P
0 g 0.0 POP
n n 1 n n n n n» nnn n n nan
,15 5,1 41885.558
I
11I IM 88//18888
8
801$8888 888888888
5. 0 0 8898 ° 88
m
8
8
0.
mmm
8 . 8 8
X/ 7373
000
DD
aa
QS
10
as
AA
00 88888 1 88888
xxxxxxxxxxxx
yy-lyH -lyyyy
mm
A AA
0 00 nn n nn
1saIMSS
I 8 8 8 8
18° ° 888
88
.088°8
a
of &v
10. la
-4
0p
s O
a_ O
000010
.00
o
0 °88 0
1 y
O
<
mIm
aa`
0 0 10
0
N
80.2
1
0
000
g0
A
d �
88'2
Xnm
HH
XI 73 °m
00
d y
s
tt
818
0 1 ' 4
m,x
9l o
8�
8n
m n
0
8
— O- 9 Z v N. N
D ,N (D O �,N V)
O n > O U + (n 7 v CO N
() 3 F 6 N� a , m 3 m
3
- O ? a m m 0 3 a ° m 3 m
O
0X� 'Da) 3 c m_3
QC ( nN .Z1 r.' (D
O U� 3 77 Ni 7` Z(n� P (D �.7 6 °
0 3 W D °' u; a' OO @i v 0p Gy m W
7 O C N N D 3 N O x(0 Hi O . N
� O 7 a v a 3-4 N v N V)? n D) O N (
(D (p O 7 a (n (n (p 1 p 4s
m� go
cu
N N'< N ry W < N N (D g. y�
3 N O C !� N Q 1.0 • 'O0) N_O > (D N
� a 7 QO O j ) D - 0 O
v 4 ' D. Q 7 N a T] g)
' a a N °' la
0 `,) X x R F'
O m x
T � T
CD
w
3
03
•
1
ccs
cn
0
O
CD
Work Session Meeting of:
10. Ami lr4cc4 # fig - K
KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH
WORK SESSION MEETING
bit/laid Q_U 20Q5