Loading...
11/07/1968 RM, r1 1 "_¢ 4 I:737 1A.1: ISLAND D BOROUGH 1 TING - Nova± T P. 7 , 1968 I CATX, TO OIOER The met bag was oiled to order at 8 :05 p.m. by Presiding Officer Don Bullock in the librney of the Main School, "Kodiak, Alaska. 11 rcu. CALL Present �y San Best, Borough Chair men Dan Bullock, Presiding Officer Iis. Betty Springhill Don Arndt Jim Bar Absent Mrs. Jo Hajdu (excused) Kr. Den Teen t wan S i0,sY1 in es A nS': 1abiyi n by the Clerk/fr-"ea.surer. ',_so Presort: 'fly Goodman, City Manager; Ivor Schott, Supert. of Schools; Nero gin, Beverly Bern, School Boyld Member:;; ;leery Carter, Seafood r ee �,__.�tteei4n; Jan Metzker, Assessor; Sally Hendrix, Clerk; Norma Holt, Secretary and p, roe ir:kately five people in the audience. r '.y: 'S C' ' P:EVIOUS L'I[ "PINGS � .. f< ; r A_... .t:dn - 10,/17/68 - Mr. Best added item VII B, es follows: "T =e e tl Mi. n 63 -33 -R approving Vacation and Replat of New Kcc iak Sebdivision, B1 :: 3 Let, 7 -22 -ASIA (Case 8d• -B) . The resolution was read. ti's. Hajdu 1 ' 7- 7' 1 . fen i_ts_ e doi ti on, seconded by Mr. Barr. The plat was studied. Mr. ?Jeer e tat i that he had a financial interest in the plat, but that if there weee no ob j ectione , he would vote in order to make a quorum. Motion carried l:rj u:r-: rnow roll call vote." This item had been inadvertently omitted from ti 'e miner ter . Mr. Parr s toted under item VII A, page three, correction of words to s is up f : , hould be made, after checking with the tape of that meeting to : > l ee t the proper phrasing. Mrs. Springhill moved to accept the minutes as ellerded, seconded by Mr. . Barr_ , and carried by unanimous voice vote. "�. ci_e1 ILL ,` - 10/31/69 - Wins. Springhill moved that the minutes be approvaa ee presented, seconded by Mr. Arndt, and carried by unanimous voice A. E. :....ID :1 Meeting - 10/23/63. There were no comments. B. Plaining & Zoning Commis ,ion -- 10/30/68. There were no comments. °h'_ _ e'nOT T= A? ND r2PPEZIRANCC REQUEST'S Mr. Ivor S Heil No ton and Architects Ed Crittenden and Ken Cannon re Pkni.ok School. Mr. Norton stated that the architects had not been back dol',nn to view the school _ it had been erected; but they did have some comments to make of the correction notices posted by the Building Inspector. The A chitectn a.:vee that the deteriorating siding should be fixed and the inter or and e%terior should be nailed where necessary. This is not a part of the Building Code but rho 1d be done for appearances and resistance to weather. The Architects are mostly concerned with the Building Inspector's requirements of a 3-hour fire wall and they felt that only a one -hour fire resistance was sufficient. Mr. Crittenden stated that under the Unifo Building Code the building is rated "C" occupancy and had Type 5 non -rat. Since the building has a Type-5 non-ratmay, the Building Code only requires one -hour if the furnace ream is°'r=del0; normally interpreted as being one floor with no basement or _cc :l.: finer. This one -hour fire wall can be accomplished by putting gypsum hoard on both rides of the wall. Mr. Best felt the one -hour fire wall would be adequate. rte. Mr • Barr suggested putting gypsum board on only one side, but the Architect-3 stated that both sides would be necessary. Mr. Crittenden also stated that the firat primary concern in regard to fires is that the children are c io to c et out of the building and second, protection of the property. There are prope r exits and an alarm system. Northland Camps' structures are ref relatively °y n:°. p xdrare construction and built light for transportation. However .n State 1 - -13 net before required that they be modified, and it was felt that _heee were gco'1 units for the price. Mr. Cannon outlined price estimates k the Pa ce ._ contractors to:.s for neceeca_-y corrections. ASSEMBLY 14EETING - November 7th, 1968 PAGE Two Mr. Barr questioned whether the buildings not the suggested windloading and Mr. Cannon replied that an engineer should calculate this out. Mr. Cannon also felt that the units should be tied to the fouadation as well as tied together. It was the general consensus of the Assembly that the Architects should pre- pare a change order and bring it back to the Assembly. The Architects requested an authorization from the Assembly to make a final inspection. Mrs. Springhill moved to concur with direction that the change order suggested by the Architects, Borough Chairman and School Board ie taking, seconded by Mr. Arndt and carried by unanimous voice call. Mr. Barr questioned if extra money will be owed baby Northland Camps. Mr. Crittended stated that the main concern is damage that was done before arrival in Kodiak. Northland Camps has accepted responsibility only for the broken windows. Mr. Barr stated in addition to this there were staples Sheared when received and thi; should Le dear: d to either Northland Cams or the steamship company. Since the Architects adz' not inspe;t the building, Mr. Beer stated that he and Mr. Stansbur would be willing to give an itemized list of damages but he would like to wait e til Mr. Stansbury returns to Kodiak. This list will be given to the Architects and then sent to Northland Camps. Mr. Barr questioned whether Northland Camps could be held responsible for lack of fire protection since it is required by the Building Code. Mr. Crittenden stated since we ordered building without plans and with the understanding that the units have proven sufficient in other locations the responsibility belongs to the Borough; however it w 3 also pointed out that since we ordered these buildings as school buildings for Alaska that they should be adequate for this u .•e. Northland Cams has been notified that the bill will not be paid until plans are received, because it was felt that the plans would be required for other problems in connection with the buildings. Mrs. Springhill questioned if the .rate could purchase buildings without plans being given and/tr. Crittenden said yes, they could. The Assembly concurred that an attempt should be made to collect ae much for damages as possible. B. Approval of Time Extension to November 15th For Russian Creek Subdivision Mr. Best read a letter from Mr. Claud M. Hofe tan, requesting time extension because of additional work involved in the sewer line placement and the fact that this additional work was not contemplated in the contract. Mr. Barr Moved to concur: and grant approval of time extension to November 15th, seconded by Mrs. Springhill, motion carried by unanimous voice vote. C. Letter Fran Claud Hoffman re Approval of Bells Flats Contract Adjuttments Mr. Best read the letter as noted above requesting approval for additional —.` work and. _letters to Mr. Barr and Mr. Best concerning it. This had been discussed previously. Mrs Springhill moved for approval of additional sewer" line work and approval of Bells Flats Eurrvcy Contraet adjustments, seconded by Mr. Arndt. Motion carried by unanimous voice Voce, Mr. Barr abstained frame- voting. VI PUBLIC HEARING A. Ordinance 68 -23 -0 Creating Fire Protection 3ervi.ce Area Outside City Limits. Mr. Barr moved for adoption and second reading of Ordinance 68 -23-0, seconded. by Mr. Arndt. The ordinance eas read. Mt. Barr moved for amendment to delete "until such time as a permanent ordinance has been adopted and pass- ed and is in effect" from page four, third line from bottom, seconded by Mr. Arndt, Motion carried by unanimous voice vote. The meting was recessed and Public Hearing opened. Mr. Norton question the-area and wanted to :know where the boundary lines were to be drawn. Mr. Norton did not think it fair that Mr. Barr had excluded himself from the fire protection area. Mr. Best stated that Mr. Barr was hired to write the and legal discription and that the area had been-determined by himself and Mr. Goodman and not Mr. Barr. Mars. Springhill and Mr. Norton stated that Fireman Tilley indicated that a fixee . truck could get down the toed to Mr. Barr's property, however Mr. Barr stated that it could_not. Mts.—Springhill asked why people without houses on their lots had to be included and it was stated that is is - r equ; red by law that all people _i included ded in the district must pay whether have a house on the lot or not. It was felt that only people that petitioned should be included -and the people that did not petition should not be ford to be included; Mr. Barr and Ier. Besteempnasized that for this reason the boundary line was set up as indicated. Mr. Norton still objected and felt everyone should help pay for the service. Mr. Norton stated that if Mr. Barr could exclude himself then Mr. Norton wanted to publicly state he wished his property to be excluded._ It was pointed out that Mr. Schreiner had asked to be excluded and it was felt he should be left out too. Mr. T. T. Jackson felt the hole area should be ... included,- otherwise later on feelings would be c ed by some people not having to pay for the ..scr vire . Mr. J c kson further felt that everyone should be responsible for fixing up their pr perty so the fire truck could get to it. ASSEMBLY MEETING - NaTMEER 7, 1960 VII PLANNING u EO I TG =TEES 0 Page three Mr. Goodman suggested that the Asserbly contact the Borough Attorney for a formal opinicn as to the Borough's liability if lots were included that could not be serviced. Mr. . Barr brought up the fact that if less than 50% of an area sign the petitie i an election would have to be held, however Mr. Best pointed ed out that more thy , 60`-a of the owners' signatures had been obtained for the c faire area. It wee felt that the Ordinance should be zrranded to include all er aeca. Mr. . Ba l r aid Mr. Best objected as the pe'titic:h ren ::;aed oat: three eee .s which ci;;n be serviced rather than an area by lc.. diecti?tion ;:!_ Derr stated if everyone tnr mia;:ing a point merely to include Ia :t Li 7 to t' ea he world agree to have only his lots included, but cold ner aena with i s '..id nr an area that could not be serviced. _ - r s L y t e y.� - hearing �!z� - .. . ._t��e:_ d' _ � � �.�;�., k. ::ic hearing �'rc.. � c .:.red and the Meeting r....o; i Te_ . :. . Idea Iarr tr,e _ t: C::c.._ n :n e be amended to include all of It- b .S 4l_i; >7e �+ 3E:67 and � ...:.: a 1: � r.._ + - J�:`�..i , and that i..,`.�' sG'f;rrtiE: i :.i be made against all leads v 2_ . ih the ee e v_:: e area. Moi:..c)n fa for a lack cf second. Mrs. p _ .inc'_ ii lt-l_ felt ' � n e 6 . t' d the L c � � <� � , _.l_c:s ,e rewritten and ordinance '- could not be pace:az- in its present form but needed more study. Mr. Arndt felt no farther atudy wry -:s -- ad d and moved O: r iinence be amended to include all of original c . n.•2.;ati.on r _ea end tnE•.t aemearments be made against all lands within the botndeoy of 1_ce __:::e% . Motion C ied for lack of a second. A :augge stiJ._ pr:. ..__.: :a tc.:b .e the Ordinance, however Mr. Barr felt it could not be t_s 1 ".erl true'_ Lae crdered. Mr. Best stated while it is true a t:uek ha i :ben c:: :- : :d _ :e no a e.?_es contract has been signed, however the company i.o ma';. i n' eenle c hanger as requested. Mr. Arndt moved that the Ordinance be :mended to :inc'nde all the orin _nay annexation area and that asst emeni - s be : de .: �: _n a c all Lends witatn the boundary of the service area, seconded b I� %'s ringhill. £4ot_!_ )n carried roll Y p red by X call vote, three to one, w1_uz Fir:. Pena ,. ve ng NO It was pointed out that the Ordinance will have to be re-edaent seer for another public hearing before being passed. A. Recc ;urrendetjcn from P &Z re Recoiling of Blocks 36 and 44, East Addition, from R-1 to ?c 2, retitienera (Case 209-10 and First Reading of Ordinance No. 68- -28 -G. ''ie Or:1ielence w4 a) read by title only. Mrs. Springhill asked if there were (117" object i_o:nhs daring Public Hearing and was told there were two, Mes. Andaich d Mee. Nc_ r`.'..1 spoke against the reason being r. th_ petition. Their re t that the jaec t°t .: ic`1 a be so)d. and rented and the renters would not take geed care of the z _ °o.L F =r L . i i o . EarLighill moved for adoption of Ordinance 68-20-0 in the fare re d't:; , seconded by I4r. Arndt. The question was called and motion 'pa_ e hY ' ?i':o - .r: ?ll roll cc 1i. B. First Re_i1in of O diro'ace NO. 6S-27-0 Rezoning Lot 2A, USS 3098 from Unclas sir fed to buedness and Tot 1, USS 3098 from Unclassified to Public Use, Felton and Tenny, and P &Z Case 207 -A. The Ordinance was read by title only. 'ibe : :e were no olre. tins. Hr. Barr :roved for adoption in first reading of Ordinance 6C-27-3, : econdcd by Ii-�° . Arndt. The question was called and motion passed by a aninous roll cell. C. First feadi r a cf Cc:c'inence 63-26-C Prending Building Code concerning Recreat .ono. i Buildinas. The Ordinance ce z r e read. Mr. Barr questioned exoluding the iti _a and wi t i i n five idle;;, he felt this should be made clearer, instead cf "excluding" perhaps tae word "excepting" should be use. It was stated that the ra,im ±ee are to reflect intent that Ordinance includes the islands even though they are closer to the City than five (5) miles. Mr. Barr moved for approval of Ordinance 68-26-0 in first reading, seconded by Mrs. Springhill. Motion passed by rear aous roll call. VIII OLD BUSINESS A. Fi.rs'. Reading of Ordinance 63-24-0 Creating Water Service Area Outside City. T:ha Orddnanee do recd. 'his includes area presently being served with plastic w e ter line rd c w'.a contii oe ao is with monthly charges to individual- the lararc 3ta t• :-'1_I get t eaet..e :: with the City as to charges for water and later inotoll water rr.eLers. Mr. Arndt moved for approval in first reading of Oa - r n, . . ieccclded by Er. '3arr. Motion passed by un- an.irrou s re 1(. c acla v,-+?:e . IX NEW BUSINESS 0 '1 r2 SSEMBLY T TG November 7, 1968 Page four B. Recommendation From Assessor re Foreclosures. A letter from Mrs. Jan Metzker was read; the Assessor needs authorization from the Assembly to prepare resolution necessary for foreclosures. Mrs. Springhill moved that Assessor he instructed to prepare a list of foreclosures for 1966 and 1967 and resolution be drawn up, seconded by Mr. Barr. The question was called and motion passed by unanimous Roll call vote. C. Proposed Ordinance on Tax Deferments For Senior Citizens. The Ordinance was read. It was suggested b he Borcugh .Attorney . to use'. the Whnd "deferment" i:7 7tead.:.of "exemp': ' , 1" , si.nte the rtatutes prohibit exemptions and deferment iS the actual intent. Also Mr. Best recommended that the minimums of the Social Security Act be included. The Borough does not lose these taxes.Teie -are.o lji:a few famtj jegv which have been given their homes to live in until they die and a lien is still held on this property by the Borough. Mr. Barr moved that the Assembly concur heartily with Mr. Best's recommendations and prepare the ordinance for first reading, seconded by Mr. Springhill. Motion carried by unanimous voice vote. D. Resolution 68 -36 -R Approving Aleutian Hermes PILOT for 1968 . Resolution was read by title only. Mrs. Springhill moved for approval of Resolution, seconded by Mr. Barr, motion passed by unanimous roll call vote. E. First Reading of Ordinance 68 -25-0 Amending Personnel Regulations. Ordinance was read by title only. Mrs. Springhill noted the difference in amount of holidays given to Borough personnel in comparison to City employees; nine for the Borough and eight for the City with Veterans' Day being different. She felt the holidays should be the same. The question was raised on the rate of pay for starting employees. Mr. Springhill wondered if a person worked himself up in rate of pay and quit how is a new employee's salary determined? It was suggested that a step system be used, however Mr. Best felt the merit system was the best and Mr. Barr agreed. Some Assemblymen objected to the Chairman having the authority to set pay rates for new employees. After further discussion, Mrs. Springhill moved that the ordinance be amended to read "employees be paid semi - monthly at no more than 1 /24th of the annual rate; seconded by Mr. Arndt, motion carried by unanimous voice vote. The question was brought up on the amount of leave time given to the employees, but it was explained that a new employee may not take leave for three months, leave can be accrued only up to thirty -six days. Mrs. Springhill moved for adoration of the Ordinance as amended at first reading, seconded by Mr. Barr, motion carried by unanimous roll call vote. A. Resolution 68 -37 -R Approving Loan for Fire Equipment. The Resolution was read. It was noted that the rate of loan was 5 -1/2 %. Mr. Barr moved for adoption of resolution with the technical revision necessary to show the 5.1/2% and five installments with balance to be due at end of five years, seconded by Mr. Arndt. Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote. B. Setting Date for Supplemental Roll BOE. A letter fran Mrs. Metzker recommended date for BOE as December 18, 1968. However as this is just the day before the regular Assembly meeting and it was felt that not many cases would be brought up the date should be set as 19 December, at 7 :30 p.m. Mr. Barr moved that the date for Supplemental BOE be set for December 19, 1968 at 7 :30 p.m., seconded by Mrs. Springhill, motion carried by unanimous voice vote. C. Approval Of Tax Adjustments R68 -27 through R68 -42. R68 -28 was; discussed. It was suggested taxes be adjusted only after demolishing building in order to expedite clearance of lot. Mr. Goodman was in agreement with this. Mr. Barr moved that the Borough set a policy of adjusting property taxes on buildings that have been condentied and ordered vacated and demmolisned on ttme basis of pro-rated taxes as ot date building is demolished and removed tram property upon request ot the property owner, seconded by M. , motion ] pawed unanimous by voice vote. Mr. Barr moved that adjustments R -68 -28 be adjusted onl on the basis of the ••li 'ust set, seconded • Mrs. •r' • '11, motion passed by unanimous roll call vote. The other adjustments were reviewed Mrs. Springhill moved for approval of Tax adjustments on R -68 -27 through R -b8-4Z with the exception of R- W3 -28, seconded by mr. Barr, motion carried by unanimous roil call v.T... =. 1 (1 4 2 1 ASSEMBLY iiFT;TING - noo:q.a -T,i 7, 1968 Page five D. Approval of Hospital Telephone Agreement. The agreement was read and it was decided that it should be with the Grey Nuns and not the Borough. •ir. Barr moved that the agreement be forwarded to the Grey Nuns with Borough concurrence attached, seconded by Airs. Springhill, motion carried unanimous by voice vote. E. Ppp aopriatio:i and Fw pendi.ture Report for October. The report was read by Fir. Best and ha stated ':hat .post nsnlit and election ri:n over the Budget. He also brought out the point that cr:r>ioyeen aa:e now bonded under the new bonding rate. The r°,_ -t. ,fended fuaid L. is inco_ ect, however the Borough is still all right T L ' .: y-Jinn bec .nee there will he e ,t -a money coming in from Penalty and interest on to a' . There were 1.0 objections from the Assembly on Expendi- tures and Voucher:, as pre ented. X Ci AIRM2 `7' S REsUne A. Letter F!0.11 S _nitariax; P1)n Fec .pit_: monts for Sewer & Water Construction Tn Trailer Courte. Mr. Best. _:ea:d3 te'tte- . The plans for more than one unit must be fo,72cwed and apps iv "i in ui" au, including expansion of existing trailcr courts. B. sirsrci ril Sat terront o_ Sb red Revenue, copies of which will be sent to the E\ ; c rr3i n y . C. 1 rop ,scai Pohl 'i i? _:e went With City For Fire Protection. has been sent to the city but has not been returned as yet. Xti "! SSEHBLY calsgi Ts XII AUDI NC,E CCIli;=:N• S The agreement F.. A . Sprin re st:-itrs of School Bonds. Mr. Best talked with Mr. Dowd concerning thi;7 and Hr. Dowd suggested that $500,000 bonds be sold in the near future, and t i r : -_ cr znh shoe 1_d hold on to the rest to see exactly how the s inrke:t fins : �xa . The Borough is 2n a very good position now as it has been authorized to :'_1 3.3 million and they can be sold at a time to take advantage of the be nt_ere 3t. rate. Firs. Springhill was concerned that the School L o-xd night not be aR i' : to go ahead with their plans because the Bonds are not s f. x. Snn arx :i.sed however that the School Board has been given the gc -ahead end continuo u' ?_ 'Z the z:• plans. The BI. School will not be finished r:::-_it_ De nnaber 1970 aid the earliest that construction on the new high schco r eclo;xed would be Fall of 1971. B. Men Bann ne Tir .i J :: <. League conference. i.•2 3a r stated- the Municipal Longue Conference wsn s7nry good as eantact can be made with people in same situat' and le :Dbyin: on some legi_._,t :_o:n can be effective. Mr. Barr personally y :elt i ,._': to gain tie 11-:.moot i ora these Conferences the Borough should send the 5-,e se..rgh Cha:i.rm :n every year instead of alternating with Assemblymen. Mn. Bnrr w, zs of the fr.r to r opinion that short course schools would be more beneficial than lectures or panels. i.2:_s. Springhill asked :.bout the status of the Unifications plan in Juneau and was informed that a Special election will be coming up concerning this the first of the tear. Mr. Bet felt tat net yeas_ ' s f 1 lr'tcipal League conference will be of greater value as Trost. of the lcgislntive work this year was carried on in committees. C. Mr. Bullock re Tax Study. Air. Bullock asked where Borough stands in regards to the Tax Study. Mir. Best stated that everyone he talked to at the Conference felt tha °:. Personal Property taxes were too expensive to try to collect. It was recorrmended that perionll property taxes be dropped and 1% sales taxes h2 in tiga ed. Thes tsmeo have been instigated in Kenai, Fairbanks, Ketc<' and Sit;ka. A. Mr. Jackson se Building Appeal Board. lir. Jackson felt that a Building Code Appeal roard should he set up and that it should be made up of retired people who hnve been here for many years, who would not have conflicts of i.ntere t ca who a : :e euperts in the buildinj trade. Mr. Best said it must be creatoJ by an ord? 1Yance and that the State statutes say appeals shall cane before the i :snsably or City Council. Mr. Arndt feels the appeal Board is a good idea an the nui..'_c'U trade has fallen off lately due primarily to neconcrriic ASSEMBLY MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 1968 Page Six reasons but also because the building code is too strict. Mrs. Springhill also felt creation of a board should be explored right away. B. Bars. Springhill re Assessing Contract. Mts. Springhill asked why contract to assess Borough was given to Fischer & Assn. and not put up for bid. Mr. Barr stated that these contracts were not bid on but negotiated for. Mr. Best mentioned he had received a call from Hr. Cornelius asking why he was not able to appraise this area. A letter was sent to two firms of appraisers and Mr. Best felt the work should be done by someone outside and they should be appraisers and not real estate brokers. The reason for using outside firm was to avoid confliction of personalities and to have unbiased opinions. The firm of Fischer & Associates was picked because they gave the best price. Total Borough will be appraised over five years -- the price will be $150 per day with an estimate of 25 to 30 days a year. The first year new buildings and new additions will be appraised and one -fifth of the Borough. This is a better price than we had been getting previously. C. dr. T. T. Jackson re Building Code. Iir. Jackson felt very strongly that he could invest his money elsewhere and have better returns than in Kodiak, and that the Code is keeping many people from investing cash here in Kodiak. Mr. Barr stated that this is an expensive code but it does raise the standard of living and that is what is needed to bring industry into Kodiak. State of Alaska's objection to establishing school here is that Kodiak is not a decent place to live. Mr. Barr continued that it is important to upgrade and make this a good, clean place to live. Mr. Arndt said Kodiak has lost the spirit of Alaska. Mr. Barr commented that Kodiak is no longer the boondocks. D. Mr. Best re Chiniak School. The Assembly will have to be considering a new school building at Chiniak in the near future as there are about fifteen or sixteen children there and the building is not adequate. XIII ADJOURNMENT - The meeting was adjourned at 12 :20 p.m. ATTEST: „ .(L Sally Mendri 1_,/c Clerk/Treasurer APPROVED: R68 -27 Unknown R68 -28 Wilson, R. C. & June R68 -29 Nelson, Cecil R68 -30 Pestrikoff, Fred R68 -31 Pestrikoff, Fred R68 -32 Boskoffsky, Dick R68 -33 Yurioff, William R68 -34 Yurioff, William R68 -35 Nelson, John R68 -36 Nelson, Abner R68 -37 Muller, Julian R68 -38 Nelson, Cecil R68 -39 Opheim, Norman R68 -40 Pestrikoff, Fred ADJUSTMENTS FOR THE ASSEMBLY MEETING OF 11/7/68 - 62.72 - 165.09 - 3.02 - 1.16 - 3.02 - 2.82 - 1.09 - 3.91 - 3.29 - 2.59 Page 1 of 2 11/7/68 The trailers and leantos on this lot were included in the real improvements & also filed on Personal Property returns. Since they are personal property, they should be removed from the real property roll. Since the City of Kodiak condemned the building on the property and ordered it to be vacated and demolished on 9/1/68, Mr. Wilson requests that an adjustment be made on his 2nd half taxes. See letter from Wilson, 10/12/68. This lot was listed as owned by Cecil Nelson. The actual owner was City of Port Lions; therefore, the lot should have been exempt from taxation. Land was listed to Fred Pestrikoff when it was actually owned by City of Port Lions and should have been exempt from taxation. (1967) Land was listed to Fred Pestrikoff when it was actually owned by City of Port Lions and should have been exempt from taxation. (1968) Land was listed to Dick Boskoffsky when it was actually owned by the City of Port Lions and should be exempt from taxation. Land was listed to William Yurioff when it was actually owned by City of Port Lions and should have been exempt from taxation. (1967) Land was listed to William Yurioff when it was actually owned by City of Port Lions and should have been exempt from taxation. Land was listed to John Nelson when it was actually owned by City of Port Lions and should be exempt from tax. Land was listed to Abner Nelson but was actually owned by City of Port Lions and should have been exempt from tax. - 2.59 Lot was actually owned by City of Port Lions, not by Julian Muller. It should be exempt from taxation. - 2.82 Lot was actually owned by City of Port Lions, not by Cecil Nelson. It should be exempt from taxation. - 2.82 Owner of this lot was actually City of Port Lions, not Norman Opheim. It should have been exempt from taxation. - 2.82 Lot was actually owned by City of Port Lions, not by Fred Pestrikoff. It should be exempt from taxation. 1 fl Page 2 of 2 11/7/68 R68 -41 Wood, Kenneth J. - 3.02 Land actually belongs to City of Port Lions, not Kenneth Wood. It should be exempt from taxation. R68 -42 Yurioff, William - 2.39 Lot owned by City of Port Lions, not William Yurioff. It should be exempt from taxation.