11/07/1968 RM, r1 1 "_¢ 4
I:737 1A.1: ISLAND D BOROUGH
1 TING - Nova± T P. 7 , 1968
I CATX, TO OIOER
The met bag was oiled to order at 8 :05 p.m. by Presiding Officer Don Bullock
in the librney of the Main School, "Kodiak, Alaska.
11 rcu. CALL
Present �y
San Best, Borough Chair men
Dan Bullock, Presiding Officer
Iis. Betty Springhill
Don Arndt
Jim Bar
Absent
Mrs. Jo Hajdu (excused)
Kr. Den Teen t wan S i0,sY1 in es A nS': 1abiyi n by the Clerk/fr-"ea.surer.
',_so Presort: 'fly Goodman, City Manager; Ivor Schott, Supert. of Schools;
Nero gin, Beverly Bern, School Boyld Member:;; ;leery Carter, Seafood
r ee
�,__.�tteei4n; Jan Metzker, Assessor; Sally Hendrix, Clerk; Norma Holt, Secretary
and p, roe ir:kately five people in the audience.
r '.y: 'S C' ' P:EVIOUS L'I[ "PINGS
� .. f< ; r A_... .t:dn - 10,/17/68 - Mr. Best added item VII B, es follows:
"T =e e tl Mi. n 63 -33 -R approving Vacation and Replat of New Kcc iak Sebdivision,
B1 :: 3 Let, 7 -22 -ASIA (Case 8d• -B) . The resolution was read. ti's. Hajdu
1 ' 7- 7' 1 . fen i_ts_ e doi ti on, seconded by Mr. Barr. The plat was studied. Mr.
?Jeer e tat i that he had a financial interest in the plat, but that if there
weee no ob j ectione , he would vote in order to make a quorum. Motion carried
l:rj u:r-: rnow roll call vote." This item had been inadvertently omitted from
ti 'e miner ter .
Mr. Parr s toted under item VII A, page three, correction of words to s is
up f : , hould be made, after checking with the tape of that meeting
to : > l ee t the proper phrasing. Mrs. Springhill moved to accept the minutes
as ellerded, seconded by Mr. . Barr_ , and carried by unanimous voice vote.
"�. ci_e1 ILL ,` - 10/31/69 - Wins. Springhill moved that the minutes be
approvaa ee presented, seconded by Mr. Arndt, and carried by unanimous voice
A. E. :....ID :1 Meeting - 10/23/63. There were no comments.
B. Plaining & Zoning Commis ,ion -- 10/30/68. There were no comments.
°h'_ _ e'nOT T= A? ND r2PPEZIRANCC REQUEST'S
Mr. Ivor S Heil No ton and Architects Ed Crittenden and Ken Cannon
re Pkni.ok School. Mr. Norton stated that the architects had not been back dol',nn
to view the school _ it had been erected; but they did have some comments
to make of the correction notices posted by the Building Inspector. The
A chitectn a.:vee that the deteriorating siding should be fixed and the inter or
and e%terior should be nailed where necessary. This is not a part of the
Building Code but rho 1d be done for appearances and resistance to weather.
The Architects are mostly concerned with the Building Inspector's requirements
of a 3-hour fire wall and they felt that only a one -hour fire resistance was
sufficient. Mr. Crittenden stated that under the Unifo Building Code the
building is rated "C" occupancy and had Type 5 non -rat. Since the building
has a Type-5 non-ratmay, the Building Code only requires one -hour if the furnace
ream is°'r=del0; normally interpreted as being one floor with no basement or
_cc :l.: finer. This one -hour fire wall can be accomplished by putting gypsum
hoard on both rides of the wall. Mr. Best felt the one -hour fire wall would
be adequate. rte. Mr • Barr suggested putting gypsum board on only one side, but
the Architect-3 stated that both sides would be necessary. Mr. Crittenden also
stated that the firat primary concern in regard to fires is that the children
are c io to c et out of the building and second, protection of the property.
There are prope r exits and an alarm system. Northland Camps' structures are
ref relatively °y n:°. p xdrare construction and built light for transportation. However
.n State 1 - -13 net before required that they be modified, and it was felt that
_heee were gco'1 units for the price. Mr. Cannon outlined price estimates
k
the Pa ce ._ contractors to:.s for neceeca_-y corrections.
ASSEMBLY 14EETING - November 7th, 1968
PAGE Two
Mr. Barr questioned whether the buildings not the suggested windloading and Mr.
Cannon replied that an engineer should calculate this out. Mr. Cannon also
felt that the units should be tied to the fouadation as well as tied together.
It was the general consensus of the Assembly that the Architects should pre-
pare a change order and bring it back to the Assembly. The Architects requested
an authorization from the Assembly to make a final inspection. Mrs. Springhill
moved to concur with direction that the change order suggested by the Architects,
Borough Chairman and School Board ie taking, seconded by Mr. Arndt and carried
by unanimous voice call. Mr. Barr questioned if extra money will be owed baby
Northland Camps. Mr. Crittended stated that the main concern is damage that was
done before arrival in Kodiak. Northland Camps has accepted responsibility only
for the broken windows. Mr. Barr stated in addition to this there were staples
Sheared when received and thi; should Le dear: d to either Northland Cams or
the steamship company. Since the Architects adz' not inspe;t the building, Mr.
Beer stated that he and Mr. Stansbur would be willing to give an itemized list
of damages but he would like to wait e til Mr. Stansbury returns to Kodiak. This
list will be given to the Architects and then sent to Northland Camps. Mr.
Barr questioned whether Northland Camps could be held responsible for lack of
fire protection since it is required by the Building Code. Mr. Crittenden
stated since we ordered building without plans and with the understanding that
the units have proven sufficient in other locations the responsibility belongs
to the Borough; however it w 3 also pointed out that since we ordered these
buildings as school buildings for Alaska that they should be adequate for this
u .•e. Northland Cams has been notified that the bill will not be paid until
plans are received, because it was felt that the plans would be required for
other problems in connection with the buildings. Mrs. Springhill questioned if
the .rate could purchase buildings without plans being given and/tr. Crittenden
said yes, they could. The Assembly concurred that an attempt should be made to
collect ae much for damages as possible.
B. Approval of Time Extension to November 15th For Russian Creek Subdivision
Mr. Best read a letter from Mr. Claud M. Hofe tan, requesting time extension
because of additional work involved in the sewer line placement and the fact
that this additional work was not contemplated in the contract. Mr. Barr
Moved to concur: and grant approval of time extension to November 15th, seconded
by Mrs. Springhill, motion carried by unanimous voice vote.
C. Letter Fran Claud Hoffman re Approval of Bells Flats Contract Adjuttments
Mr. Best read the letter as noted above requesting approval for additional —.`
work and. _letters to Mr. Barr and Mr. Best concerning it. This had been
discussed previously. Mrs Springhill moved for approval of additional sewer"
line work and approval of Bells Flats Eurrvcy Contraet adjustments, seconded
by Mr. Arndt. Motion carried by unanimous voice Voce, Mr. Barr abstained frame-
voting.
VI PUBLIC HEARING
A. Ordinance 68 -23 -0 Creating Fire Protection 3ervi.ce Area Outside City
Limits. Mr. Barr moved for adoption and second reading of Ordinance 68 -23-0,
seconded. by Mr. Arndt. The ordinance eas read. Mt. Barr moved for amendment
to delete "until such time as a permanent ordinance has been adopted and pass-
ed and is in effect" from page four, third line from bottom, seconded by Mr.
Arndt, Motion carried by unanimous voice vote. The meting was recessed and
Public Hearing opened. Mr. Norton question the-area and wanted to :know where
the boundary lines were to be drawn. Mr. Norton did not think it fair that
Mr. Barr had excluded himself from the fire protection area. Mr. Best stated
that Mr. Barr was hired to write the and legal discription and that
the area had been-determined by himself and Mr. Goodman and not Mr. Barr.
Mars. Springhill and Mr. Norton stated that Fireman Tilley indicated that a fixee .
truck could get down the toed to Mr. Barr's property, however Mr. Barr stated
that it could_not. Mts.—Springhill asked why people without houses on their
lots had to be included and it was stated that is is - r equ; red by law that all
people _i included ded in the district must pay whether have a house on the lot
or not. It was felt that only people that petitioned should be included -and
the people that did not petition should not be ford to be included; Mr.
Barr and Ier. Besteempnasized that for this reason the boundary line was set up
as indicated. Mr. Norton still objected and felt everyone should help
pay for the service. Mr. Norton stated that if Mr. Barr could exclude himself
then Mr. Norton wanted to publicly state he wished his property to be excluded._
It was pointed out that Mr. Schreiner had asked to be excluded and it was felt
he should be left out too. Mr. T. T. Jackson felt the hole area should be ...
included,- otherwise later on feelings would be c ed by some people not
having to pay for the ..scr vire . Mr. J c kson further felt that everyone should be
responsible for fixing up their pr perty so the fire truck could get to it.
ASSEMBLY MEETING - NaTMEER 7, 1960
VII PLANNING u EO I TG =TEES
0
Page three
Mr. Goodman suggested that the Asserbly contact the Borough Attorney for
a formal opinicn as to the Borough's liability if lots were included that
could not be serviced. Mr. . Barr brought up the fact that if less than 50%
of an area sign the petitie i an election would have to be held, however
Mr. Best pointed ed out that more thy , 60`-a of the owners' signatures had been
obtained for the c faire area. It wee felt that the Ordinance should be
zrranded to include all er aeca. Mr. . Ba l r aid Mr. Best objected as
the pe'titic:h ren ::;aed oat: three eee .s which ci;;n be serviced rather than
an area by lc.. diecti?tion ;:!_ Derr stated if everyone tnr mia;:ing a point
merely to include Ia :t Li 7 to t' ea he world agree to have only his lots
included, but cold ner aena with i s '..id nr an area that could not be
serviced. _ - r s L y t e y.� - hearing �!z� - .. . ._t��e:_ d' _ � � �.�;�., k. ::ic hearing �'rc.. � c .:.red and the
Meeting r....o; i Te_ . :. . Idea Iarr tr,e _ t: C::c.._ n :n e be amended to include all of
It- b
.S 4l_i; >7e �+ 3E:67 and � ...:.: a 1: � r.._ + - J�:`�..i , and that i..,`.�' sG'f;rrtiE: i :.i be made against
all leads v 2_ . ih the ee e v_:: e area. Moi:..c)n fa for a lack cf second.
Mrs. p _ .inc'_ ii lt-l_ felt ' � n e 6 . t' d the L c � � <� � , _.l_c:s ,e rewritten and ordinance
'-
could not be pace:az- in its present form but needed more study. Mr. Arndt felt
no farther atudy wry -:s -- ad d and moved O: r iinence be amended to include all of
original c . n.•2.;ati.on r _ea end tnE•.t aemearments be made against all lands within
the botndeoy of 1_ce __:::e% . Motion C ied for lack of a second. A
:augge stiJ._ pr:. ..__.: :a tc.:b .e the Ordinance, however Mr. Barr felt it could
not be t_s 1 ".erl true'_ Lae crdered. Mr. Best stated while it is
true a t:uek ha i :ben c:: :- : :d _ :e no a e.?_es contract has been signed, however the
company i.o ma';. i n' eenle c hanger as requested. Mr. Arndt moved that the
Ordinance be :mended to :inc'nde all the orin _nay annexation area and that
asst emeni - s be : de .: �: _n a c all Lends witatn the boundary of the service
area, seconded b I� %'s ringhill. £4ot_!_ )n carried roll Y p red by X call vote, three
to one, w1_uz Fir:. Pena ,. ve ng NO It was pointed out that the Ordinance will
have to be re-edaent seer for another public hearing before being passed.
A. Recc ;urrendetjcn from P &Z re Recoiling of Blocks 36 and 44, East Addition,
from R-1 to ?c 2, retitienera (Case 209-10 and First Reading of Ordinance
No. 68- -28 -G. ''ie Or:1ielence w4 a) read by title only. Mrs. Springhill asked if
there were (117" object i_o:nhs daring Public Hearing and was told there were two,
Mes. Andaich d Mee. Nc_ r`.'..1 spoke against the reason being
r. th_ petition. Their re
t
that the jaec t°t .: ic`1 a be so)d. and rented and the renters would not take
geed care of the z _ °o.L F =r L . i i o . EarLighill moved for adoption of Ordinance
68-20-0 in the fare re d't:; , seconded by I4r. Arndt. The question was called
and motion 'pa_ e hY ' ?i':o - .r: ?ll roll cc 1i.
B. First Re_i1in of O diro'ace NO. 6S-27-0 Rezoning Lot 2A, USS 3098 from
Unclas sir fed to buedness and Tot 1, USS 3098 from Unclassified to Public
Use, Felton and Tenny, and P &Z Case 207 -A. The Ordinance was read by title
only. 'ibe : :e were no olre. tins. Hr. Barr :roved for adoption in first reading
of Ordinance 6C-27-3, : econdcd by Ii-�° . Arndt. The question was called and
motion passed by a aninous roll cell.
C. First feadi r a cf Cc:c'inence 63-26-C Prending Building Code concerning
Recreat .ono. i Buildinas. The Ordinance ce z r e read. Mr. Barr questioned
exoluding the iti _a and wi t i i n five idle;;, he felt this should be made clearer,
instead cf "excluding" perhaps tae word "excepting" should be use. It was
stated that the ra,im ±ee are to reflect intent that Ordinance includes the
islands even though they are closer to the City than five (5) miles. Mr. Barr
moved for approval of Ordinance 68-26-0 in first reading, seconded by Mrs.
Springhill. Motion passed by rear aous roll call.
VIII OLD BUSINESS
A. Fi.rs'. Reading of Ordinance 63-24-0 Creating Water Service Area Outside
City. T:ha Orddnanee do recd. 'his includes area presently being served
with plastic w e ter line rd c w'.a contii oe ao is with monthly charges to
individual- the lararc 3ta t• :-'1_I get t eaet..e :: with the City as to charges for
water and later inotoll water rr.eLers. Mr. Arndt moved for approval in first
reading of Oa - r n, . . ieccclded by Er. '3arr. Motion passed by un-
an.irrou s re 1(. c acla v,-+?:e .
IX NEW BUSINESS
0 '1
r2 SSEMBLY T TG November 7, 1968
Page four
B. Recommendation From Assessor re Foreclosures. A letter from Mrs. Jan
Metzker was read; the Assessor needs authorization from the Assembly to prepare
resolution necessary for foreclosures. Mrs. Springhill moved that Assessor
he instructed to prepare a list of foreclosures for 1966 and 1967 and resolution
be drawn up, seconded by Mr. Barr. The question was called and motion passed
by unanimous Roll call vote.
C. Proposed Ordinance on Tax Deferments For Senior Citizens. The Ordinance
was read. It was suggested b he Borcugh .Attorney . to use'. the Whnd "deferment"
i:7 7tead.:.of "exemp': ' , 1" , si.nte the rtatutes prohibit exemptions and deferment iS
the actual intent. Also Mr. Best recommended that the minimums of the Social
Security Act be included. The Borough does not lose these taxes.Teie -are.o lji:a few
famtj jegv which have been given their homes to live in until they die and a lien
is still held on this property by the Borough. Mr. Barr moved that the Assembly
concur heartily with Mr. Best's recommendations and prepare the ordinance for
first reading, seconded by Mr. Springhill. Motion carried by unanimous voice
vote.
D. Resolution 68 -36 -R Approving Aleutian Hermes PILOT for 1968 . Resolution
was read by title only. Mrs. Springhill moved for approval of Resolution,
seconded by Mr. Barr, motion passed by unanimous roll call vote.
E. First Reading of Ordinance 68 -25-0 Amending Personnel Regulations. Ordinance
was read by title only. Mrs. Springhill noted the difference in amount of
holidays given to Borough personnel in comparison to City employees; nine for
the Borough and eight for the City with Veterans' Day being different. She
felt the holidays should be the same. The question was raised on the rate of
pay for starting employees. Mr. Springhill wondered if a person worked himself
up in rate of pay and quit how is a new employee's salary determined? It was
suggested that a step system be used, however Mr. Best felt the merit system was
the best and Mr. Barr agreed. Some Assemblymen objected to the Chairman having
the authority to set pay rates for new employees. After further discussion,
Mrs. Springhill moved that the ordinance be amended to read "employees be paid
semi - monthly at no more than 1 /24th of the annual rate; seconded by Mr. Arndt,
motion carried by unanimous voice vote. The question was brought up on the
amount of leave time given to the employees, but it was explained that a new
employee may not take leave for three months, leave can be accrued only up to
thirty -six days. Mrs. Springhill moved for adoration of the Ordinance as
amended at first reading, seconded by Mr. Barr, motion carried by unanimous
roll call vote.
A. Resolution 68 -37 -R Approving Loan for Fire Equipment. The Resolution
was read. It was noted that the rate of loan was 5 -1/2 %. Mr. Barr moved
for adoption of resolution with the technical revision necessary to show the
5.1/2% and five installments with balance to be due at end of five years,
seconded by Mr. Arndt. Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote.
B. Setting Date for Supplemental Roll BOE. A letter fran Mrs. Metzker
recommended date for BOE as December 18, 1968. However as this is just the
day before the regular Assembly meeting and it was felt that not many cases
would be brought up the date should be set as 19 December, at 7 :30 p.m.
Mr. Barr moved that the date for Supplemental BOE be set for December 19,
1968 at 7 :30 p.m., seconded by Mrs. Springhill, motion carried by unanimous
voice vote.
C. Approval Of Tax Adjustments R68 -27 through R68 -42. R68 -28 was;
discussed. It was suggested taxes be adjusted only after demolishing building
in order to expedite clearance of lot. Mr. Goodman was in agreement with this.
Mr. Barr moved that the Borough set a policy of adjusting property taxes on
buildings that have been condentied and ordered vacated and demmolisned on ttme
basis of pro-rated taxes as ot date building is demolished and removed tram
property upon request ot the property owner, seconded by M. , motion
] pawed unanimous by voice vote. Mr. Barr moved that adjustments R -68 -28 be
adjusted onl on the basis of the ••li 'ust set, seconded • Mrs. •r' • '11,
motion passed by unanimous roll call vote. The other adjustments were reviewed
Mrs. Springhill moved for approval of Tax adjustments on R -68 -27 through
R -b8-4Z with the exception of R- W3 -28, seconded by mr. Barr, motion carried by
unanimous roil call v.T... =.
1 (1 4 2 1
ASSEMBLY iiFT;TING - noo:q.a -T,i 7, 1968
Page five
D. Approval of Hospital Telephone Agreement. The agreement was read and it
was decided that it should be with the Grey Nuns and not the Borough. •ir. Barr
moved that the agreement be forwarded to the Grey Nuns with Borough concurrence
attached, seconded by Airs. Springhill, motion carried unanimous by voice vote.
E. Ppp aopriatio:i and Fw pendi.ture Report for October. The report was read by
Fir. Best and ha stated ':hat .post nsnlit and election ri:n over the Budget. He
also brought out the point that cr:r>ioyeen aa:e now bonded under the new bonding
rate. The r°,_ -t. ,fended fuaid L. is inco_ ect, however the Borough is still
all right T L ' .: y-Jinn bec .nee there will he e ,t -a money coming in from Penalty
and interest on to a' . There were 1.0 objections from the Assembly on Expendi-
tures and Voucher:, as pre ented.
X Ci AIRM2 `7' S REsUne
A. Letter F!0.11 S _nitariax; P1)n Fec .pit_: monts for Sewer & Water Construction
Tn Trailer Courte. Mr. Best. _:ea:d3 te'tte- . The plans for more than one unit
must be fo,72cwed and apps iv "i in ui" au, including expansion of existing
trailcr courts.
B. sirsrci ril Sat terront o_ Sb red Revenue, copies of which will be sent
to the E\ ; c rr3i n y .
C. 1 rop ,scai Pohl 'i i? _:e went With City For Fire Protection.
has been sent to the city but has not been returned as yet.
Xti "! SSEHBLY calsgi Ts
XII AUDI NC,E CCIli;=:N• S
The agreement
F.. A . Sprin re st:-itrs of School Bonds. Mr. Best talked with Mr. Dowd
concerning thi;7 and Hr. Dowd suggested that $500,000 bonds be sold in the near
future, and t i r : -_ cr znh shoe 1_d hold on to the rest to see exactly how the
s inrke:t fins : �xa . The Borough is 2n a very good position now as it has been
authorized to :'_1 3.3 million and they can be sold at a time to take advantage
of the be nt_ere 3t. rate. Firs. Springhill was concerned that the School
L o-xd night not be aR i' : to go ahead with their plans because the Bonds are
not s f. x. Snn arx :i.sed however that the School Board has been given the
gc -ahead end continuo u' ?_ 'Z the z:• plans. The BI. School will not be
finished r:::-_it_ De nnaber 1970 aid the earliest that construction on the new
high schco r eclo;xed would be Fall of 1971.
B. Men Bann ne Tir .i J :: <. League conference. i.•2 3a r stated- the Municipal
Longue Conference wsn s7nry good as eantact can be made with people in same
situat' and le :Dbyin: on some legi_._,t :_o:n can be effective. Mr. Barr
personally y :elt i ,._': to gain tie 11-:.moot i ora these Conferences the Borough
should send the 5-,e se..rgh Cha:i.rm :n every year instead of alternating with
Assemblymen. Mn. Bnrr w, zs of the fr.r to r opinion that short course schools
would be more beneficial than lectures or panels.
i.2:_s. Springhill asked :.bout the status of the Unifications plan in Juneau
and was informed that a Special election will be coming up concerning this the
first of the tear.
Mr. Bet felt tat net yeas_ ' s f 1 lr'tcipal League conference will be of greater
value as Trost. of the lcgislntive work this year was carried on in committees.
C. Mr. Bullock re Tax Study. Air. Bullock asked where Borough stands in
regards to the Tax Study. Mir. Best stated that everyone he talked to at the
Conference felt tha °:. Personal Property taxes were too expensive to try to
collect. It was recorrmended that perionll property taxes be dropped and 1%
sales taxes h2 in tiga ed. Thes tsmeo have been instigated in Kenai,
Fairbanks, Ketc<' and Sit;ka.
A. Mr. Jackson se Building Appeal Board. lir. Jackson felt that a Building
Code Appeal roard should he set up and that it should be made up of retired
people who hnve been here for many years, who would not have conflicts of
i.ntere t ca who a : :e euperts in the buildinj trade. Mr. Best said it must
be creatoJ by an ord? 1Yance and that the State statutes say appeals shall cane
before the i :snsably or City Council. Mr. Arndt feels the appeal Board is a
good idea an the nui..'_c'U trade has fallen off lately due primarily to neconcrriic
ASSEMBLY MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 1968
Page Six
reasons but also because the building code is too strict. Mrs. Springhill
also felt creation of a board should be explored right away.
B. Bars. Springhill re Assessing Contract. Mts. Springhill asked why contract
to assess Borough was given to Fischer & Assn. and not put up for bid.
Mr. Barr stated that these contracts were not bid on but negotiated for.
Mr. Best mentioned he had received a call from Hr. Cornelius asking why he was
not able to appraise this area. A letter was sent to two firms of appraisers
and Mr. Best felt the work should be done by someone outside and they should
be appraisers and not real estate brokers. The reason for using outside firm
was to avoid confliction of personalities and to have unbiased opinions.
The firm of Fischer & Associates was picked because they gave the best price.
Total Borough will be appraised over five years -- the price will be $150 per
day with an estimate of 25 to 30 days a year. The first year new buildings
and new additions will be appraised and one -fifth of the Borough. This is a
better price than we had been getting previously.
C. dr. T. T. Jackson re Building Code. Iir. Jackson felt very strongly that he
could invest his money elsewhere and have better returns than in Kodiak, and
that the Code is keeping many people from investing cash here in Kodiak. Mr.
Barr stated that this is an expensive code but it does raise the standard of
living and that is what is needed to bring industry into Kodiak. State of
Alaska's objection to establishing school here is that Kodiak is not a decent
place to live. Mr. Barr continued that it is important to upgrade and make
this a good, clean place to live. Mr. Arndt said Kodiak has lost the spirit
of Alaska. Mr. Barr commented that Kodiak is no longer the boondocks.
D. Mr. Best re Chiniak School. The Assembly will have to be considering
a new school building at Chiniak in the near future as there are about fifteen
or sixteen children there and the building is not adequate.
XIII ADJOURNMENT - The meeting was adjourned at 12 :20 p.m.
ATTEST:
„ .(L
Sally Mendri
1_,/c
Clerk/Treasurer
APPROVED:
R68 -27 Unknown
R68 -28 Wilson, R. C. & June
R68 -29 Nelson, Cecil
R68 -30 Pestrikoff, Fred
R68 -31 Pestrikoff, Fred
R68 -32 Boskoffsky, Dick
R68 -33 Yurioff, William
R68 -34 Yurioff, William
R68 -35 Nelson, John
R68 -36 Nelson, Abner
R68 -37 Muller, Julian
R68 -38 Nelson, Cecil
R68 -39 Opheim, Norman
R68 -40 Pestrikoff, Fred
ADJUSTMENTS FOR THE ASSEMBLY MEETING OF 11/7/68
- 62.72
- 165.09
- 3.02
- 1.16
- 3.02
- 2.82
- 1.09
- 3.91
- 3.29
- 2.59
Page 1 of 2
11/7/68
The trailers and leantos on this
lot were included in the real
improvements & also filed on Personal
Property returns. Since they are
personal property, they should be
removed from the real property roll.
Since the City of Kodiak condemned
the building on the property and
ordered it to be vacated and demolished
on 9/1/68, Mr. Wilson requests that
an adjustment be made on his 2nd half
taxes. See letter from Wilson, 10/12/68.
This lot was listed as owned by Cecil
Nelson. The actual owner was City of
Port Lions; therefore, the lot should
have been exempt from taxation.
Land was listed to Fred Pestrikoff
when it was actually owned by City of
Port Lions and should have been exempt
from taxation. (1967)
Land was listed to Fred Pestrikoff
when it was actually owned by City of
Port Lions and should have been exempt
from taxation. (1968)
Land was listed to Dick Boskoffsky
when it was actually owned by the
City of Port Lions and should be
exempt from taxation.
Land was listed to William Yurioff
when it was actually owned by City of
Port Lions and should have been exempt
from taxation. (1967)
Land was listed to William Yurioff
when it was actually owned by City
of Port Lions and should have been
exempt from taxation.
Land was listed to John Nelson when
it was actually owned by City of Port
Lions and should be exempt from tax.
Land was listed to Abner Nelson but
was actually owned by City of Port
Lions and should have been exempt
from tax.
- 2.59 Lot was actually owned by City of
Port Lions, not by Julian Muller. It
should be exempt from taxation.
- 2.82 Lot was actually owned by City of
Port Lions, not by Cecil Nelson. It
should be exempt from taxation.
- 2.82 Owner of this lot was actually City of
Port Lions, not Norman Opheim. It
should have been exempt from taxation.
- 2.82 Lot was actually owned by City of
Port Lions, not by Fred Pestrikoff.
It should be exempt from taxation.
1
fl
Page 2 of 2
11/7/68
R68 -41 Wood, Kenneth J. - 3.02 Land actually belongs to City of
Port Lions, not Kenneth Wood. It
should be exempt from taxation.
R68 -42 Yurioff, William - 2.39 Lot owned by City of Port Lions, not
William Yurioff. It should be exempt
from taxation.