The URL can be used to link to this page

2020-12-01 Work Session Visit our website at www.kodiakak.us www.facebook.com/Kodiakislandborough @KodiakBorough Kodiak Island Borough Assembly Work Session Tuesday, December 1, 2020, 6:30 p.m. For public participation this meeting will be livestreamed through KIB UstreamTV (https://video.ibm.com/channel/kodiakislandborough) And broadcasted on KMXT at 100.1 FM Work Sessions are informal meetings of the Assembly where Assembly members review the upcoming regular meeting agenda packet and seek or receive information from staff . Although additional items not listed on the work session agenda are discussed when introduced by the Mayor, Assembly, or staff, no formal action is taken at work sessions and items that require formal Assembly action are placed on regular Assembly meeting agenda. Citizen’s comments at work sessions are NOT considered part of the official record. Citizen’s comments intended for the “official record” should be made at a regular Assembly meeting. Page 1. CITIZENS’ COMMENTS Limited To Three Minutes Per Speaker a. Please Call 1-907-486-3231 Or Toll Free 1-855-492-9202. 2. AGENDA ITEMS Complete Agenda Packets can be obtain by: • Going To The KIB Website - https://kodiakak.civicweb.net/portal/ • For A PDF File, Email The Clerk at clerks@kodiakak.us • For A Paper Copy, Email The Clerk at clerks@kodiakak.us (packets are available 24 hours before the beginning of the meeting) a. Begin Fiscal Year 2022 Budget Discussions. b. Presentation On Current Tax Ordinance. c. Upcoming Budget-Policy And Process. d. Maximum Allowable Tax Revenue Ordinance. 4 - 219 e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough Building Projects Planning Discussion For Current And Future Budgets. Presentation - Pdf 3. MANAGER COMMENTS 4. CLERK’S COMMENTS Page 1 of 219 Visit our website at www.kodiakak.us www.facebook.com/Kodiakislandborough @KodiakBorough 5. PACKET REVIEW FOR DECEMBER 3, 2020 REGULAR MEETING Items may be added during the work session for inclusion on the Regular Meeting agenda. The item title needs to be provided/developed at the work session in enough detail to give assembly and public reasonable notice. AWARDS AND PRESENTATIONS 1. State Lobbyist, Mark Hickey of Hickey & Associates, 2020 Annual Report. PUBLIC HEARING 1. Ordinance No. FY2021-12 Of The Assembly Of The Kodiak Island Borough Amending KIBC Title 3 Revenue And Finance, Chapter 3.80 Excise Tax On Cigarettes And Tobacco Products Section .020 Definitions and Section .030 Excise Tax On Cigarettes And Tobacco Products. 2. Ordinance No. FY2021-16 Amending KIBC Title 3 Revenue And Finance, Chapter 3.630 Motor Vehicle Registration Tax, Section .030 Fee Imposed & Section .040 Annual Fee Imposed On Commercial Plates. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Election Of The Deputy Presiding Officer. NEW BUSINESS CONTRACTS 1. Amendment No. 1 Amending Contract No. FY2019-25 Residential and Commercial Solid Waste Collection and Recycling Services. RESOLUTIONS None. ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION 1. Ordinance No. FY2021-01E Amending Ordinance No. FY2021-01, Fiscal Year 2021 Budget, By Amending Budgets To Account For Various Revenues That Are Over Budget, Providing For Additional Expenditures And Moving Funds Between Projects. 2. Ordinance No. FY2021-07A Supplementing Ordinance No. FY2021-07 Regarding The Disposition Of A Tax Foreclosed Property, 810 Hillside Drive Formally Owned By Ada And Susan Panamarioff, Setting A Minimum Bid And Sale Process As Borough Land Sale Number Twenty-One. 3. Ordinance No. FY2021-24 Determining The Disposition Of A Tax Foreclosed Property Acquired By Clerk's Deed More Than 10 Years Ago And Establishing Intention To By Finding That The Properties Are Submerged By Water And Have No Assessed Value Therefore Will Be Retained By The Borough. OTHER ITEMS 1. Mayoral Appointments Of Assembly Member Representatives To Different Boards, Committees, and Commissions. 2. 2021 Kodiak Island Borough Annual Calendar EXECUTIVE SESSION 1. Solid Waste Contract No. FY2019-25 Teleconference With Borough Attorney, Scott Brandt-Erichsen. Page 2 of 219 Visit our website at www.kodiakak.us www.facebook.com/Kodiakislandborough @KodiakBorough 6. ASSEMBLY MEMBERS COMMENTS 7. MAYOR’S COMMENTS Page 3 of 219 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH STAFF REPORT DECEMBER 1, 2020 ASSEMBLY WORK SESSION Kodiak Island Borough SUBJECT: Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough Building Projects Planning Discussion For Current And Future Budgets. ORIGINATOR: Dave Conrad RECOMMENDATION: DISCUSSION: Discuss and provide a policy decision regarding continued funding for planning and design for facility required maintenance, improvements and renovation of the KIB Office Complex and Maintenance Facility. ALTERNATIVES: FISCAL IMPACT: OTHER INFORMATION: AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 4 of 219 Maintenance and Repair Discussion AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 5 of 219 710 Mill Bay Roof Replacement Minimal Asbestos Replacement AC Unit Replaced Minimal Direct Digital Control Replacement –VAV’s -Computer Upgrade Minimal Sidewalk Repairs Exterior Paint / Sign Replacement AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 6 of 219 Facility cut in half –High School Project Asbestos Abatement –Boiler Room –High School Project New Fuel Tank –High School Project Fire Alarm System Repaired –Detectors Installed did not match system AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 7 of 219 Asbestos Abatement in Boiler Room / Mechanical Spaces / Crawlspace Furnace Replacement –Current Oil-Fired Boilers Replace Generator DDC Controls / Software Upgrades Duct / Piping Replacement as Required Electrical Upgrades Interior Renovations / Replacement / Upgrades Fire Alarm System Upgrades AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 8 of 219 AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 9 of 219 AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 10 of 219 AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 11 of 219 AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 12 of 219 AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 13 of 219 Prioritize and begin repair/replacements Perform required abatement so maintenance and repair can take place Replace boilers –Both buildings –Oil and electric Replace Generator Perform HVAC upgrades –Ventilation and Heating –Minimal Control Continue to Design and Expend Funds? Additional Information for Upcoming Budget Discussions?AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 14 of 219 Page 1 of 1 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH Engineering & Facilities Department MEMORANDUM DATE: 11/23/2020 TO: Mayor William Roberts, Kodiak Island Borough Assembly, Manager Powers FROM: David Conrad, E/F Director RE: Borough Building Repairs and Maintenance – Future Project Funding For several years, the Engineering and Facilities Department with the permission of the assemblies have conducted multiple studies and prepared designs and estimates for identified large renovation projects as well as maintenance and repair items required for the 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak Island Borough Office Complex and Maintenance Buildings. The lengthy list of items has been reviewed and discussed by multiple assemblies however minimal or no action has taken place to address, prioritize or fund required facility repairs and upgrades. The attachments provided in the agenda packet are a few of the most recent planning, design, and work efforts. These detail projects that were discussed and developed with the permission of the recent assemblies. Staff is requesting direction to the path forward regarding the provided information. In the attached December 2013 memorandum to staff from the KIB contract Architectural Contractor, Jensen Yorba Lott Inc., provides in the Executive Summary eleven items were identified as deficient and the memo states that funds were earmarked for corrective work. Other than the last item that discussed relocating the KIBSD administration to the “donut hole” or current central offices location, not one single item has been funded or accomplished in seven years. Since this 2013 memo, additional design and recommendation for repairs, maintenance and upgrades have been accomplished. Several items are now at the point of required attention. Asbestos abatement not being performed in the boiler room has now led to the inability to replace safety items associated with the existing 1968 oil fired boilers and they have been cited on multiple occasions by the state boiler inspector. Asbestos abatement has been identified as being required in the crawl space of the facilities, especially where normal access to service building system components is required by staff and contractors. If a decision is made to replace the current facility, abatement will be required prior to demolition. These preceding items are two of the multiple maintenance, repair, and replacement items for an in-depth discussion regarding a path forward and future request for funding associated with these specific borough facilities. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 15 of 219 Serving Alaska Since 1935 ARCHITECTURE  INTERIOR DESIGN  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 522 WEST 10TH STREET JUNEAU, ALASKA 99801 (907) 586-1070 FAX (907) 586-3959 www.jensenyorbalott.com PAGE 1 Jensen Yorba Lott Inc. MEMORANDUM Date: December 31, 2013 To: Matt Gandel, Jessi Wolfe, Bob Tucker From: Tony Yorba RE: KIB Borough Building Conditions Report Draft CC: Mark Frischkorn, RSA Inc; Robert Posma, PDC Inc. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction: The Kodiak Island Borough building is a heavily used building housing many of the primary Administrative office functions of the Kodiak Island Borough (KIB), Kodiak Island School District (KIBSD), City of Kodiak and other functions. The building has been identified as needed numerous major maintenance improvements in order to continue supporting the functions of its occupants. Past reports and surveys (included in the appendix to this report) have attempted to quantify the scope and relative cost of the corrective work necessary to address these deficiencies. Recently some of the deficiencies noted were earmarked with funds to accomplish the corrective work. They include: 1. Improvements to power distribution panels 2. Installation of return air ducts serving the second floor 3. Additional power outlets to support office functions building wide. 4. Replace existing oil fired boilers 5. Remove asbestos associated with the boiler area 6. Replace emergency generator with new generator sized for 100% of borough building and existing learning center electrical loads 7. Remove asbestos associated with the generator area 8. Install new carpeting in the borough building 9. Remove existing asbestos containing floor tile and mastic where existing carpet is removed. 10. DDC control system re-habilitation AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 16 of 219 ARCHITECTURE  INTERIOR DESIGN  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 522 WEST 10TH STREET JUNEAU, ALASKA 99801 (907) 586-1070 FAX (907) 586-3959 www.jensenyorbalott.com PAGE 2 11. Code analysis to justify moving KIBSD offices from borough building to existing KHS donut wing. The Design team of Jensen Yorba Lott Inc, (Architects); RSA Inc., (Mechanical Engineers); PDC Inc., (Electrical Engineers) were asked to review the existing building and document existing conditions to confirm the scope of work necessary to accomplish these improvements. Conclusions and Recommendations: The following is the proposed scope of work: Architectural: 1. Complete a code analysis to confirm phasing and general configuration of the space planning work. 2. Update the floor plans so that they accurately reflect existing conditions. 3. Coordinate phasing of the work, including routing of replacement power and data cabling and panels, HVAC and controls. 4. Cutting walls, ceilings and floors as required to access plenums and other interstitial space for removal of existing systems to be replaced. All cutting to be accomplished under ACM procedures. 5. Patch and paint existing walls and ceilings after installation of new mechanical and electrical work. 6. Provide plan modifications as required to support the mechanical and electrical work. For instance, space may be needed for additional air handlers or data/com rooms . These spaces may need additional special provisions (such as cooling for data/com rooms). 7. Removal of existing flooring (including ACM finishes and mastics) and replacement with new finishes. 8. If warranted and requested, some space planning may be required if it is decided to re-configure the former school district spaces. Mechanical: 1. Consider replacing the existing ventilation system with a VAV (variable air volume system if funds permit. 2. The boilers should be replaced with higher efficiency reliable equipment. 3. The air handler serving the assembly chambers should be replaced. 4. The data processing area should have its two ventilation systems combined into one reliable one with digital control. 5. Return air connections to the hallway in the main wing need to be removed. We recommend connecting each office to the above ceiling space and connecting the main return duct to this space and using the above ceiling area as a return plenum. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 17 of 219 ARCHITECTURE  INTERIOR DESIGN  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 522 WEST 10TH STREET JUNEAU, ALASKA 99801 (907) 586-1070 FAX (907) 586-3959 www.jensenyorbalott.com PAGE 3 6. The convector control valves should be replaced with digital valves and thermostats. 7. Replace office convectors 8. Investigate heating and plumbing piping for possible corrosion and restriction. Electrical: 1. Replace/upgrade power distribution system as follows: install 400 amp feeder; upgrade panelboards, feeders, and step down transformers based on calculated loads; re-purpose an existing office on the first floor as an electrical room for 480/277 volt and 208/120 volt panels and transformers. 2. Provide a new pad mount standby generator and automatic transfer switches. 3. Upgrade Data/Comm system in the vacated school district spaces, and elsewhere in the building as required to support the improved office functions requested. 4. If possible within funds available, provide life safety upgrades to the fire detection and alarm system. 5. If possible within funds available, provide new energy efficient light fixtures throughout the office building. Budget: The total budget request for the project is expected to be approximately $2.4M, some of which has already been committed to the project. The design team will include a conceptual design phase that will assign budgets to each work item. The scope of work will be balanced so that the project budget can be maintained. Schedule: The project phasing hinges on the school district moving out of the borough building. That is not expected to occur before September, 2014. Work will not start before then. ARCHITECTURAL Building History and General Description The Kodiak Borough Building is located on Borough Hill adjacent to the existing Kodiak High School. The building was originally built as dorms for the Aleutian Vocation School in 1968. At some point in the past the building was no longer needed for dorms, and was surplused to the Borough from the school district. The building currently houses: Kodiak Island Borough AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 18 of 219 ARCHITECTURE  INTERIOR DESIGN  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 522 WEST 10TH STREET JUNEAU, ALASKA 99801 (907) 586-1070 FAX (907) 586-3959 www.jensenyorbalott.com PAGE 4 administrative offices; City of Kodiak administrative offices; Kodiak Island Borough School District administrative offices; Kodiak Island Borough Assembly Chambers; and miscellaneous other users. The building consists of a long, narrow two story block with an adjacent rectangular block aligned with the second floor and connected to it with a narrow corridor that also contains a stair to the first floor. Construction consist of conventional concrete spread footings and slab; concrete block bearing walls, steel bar joist floor framing and roof framing supporting a mix of concrete filled steel deck and plywood sheathing. Exterior walls are clad with horizontal wood siding over wood furring, which appears to have been added at some point in the past, as it does not appear on the original drawings. Interior sides of the concrete block are covered with 2x2 furring strips with fiberglass insulation (+- R6). Windows are aluminum curtain walls with mostly fixed insulated glass, with some operable lights, and cement asbestos panel spandrel sections. The roof and roof insulation was replaced in 2011 with a membrane roof and average R value of approximately R35. Exterior doors consist of aluminum storefronts and solid core doors. Interior finishes include the original painted gypsum drywall ceilings and walls except that some past space reconfiguration occurred (primarily in the assembly chambers area and where the single story corridor connects to the two story wing). Most of the original drywall assembly has been identified as asbestos containing. Floors consist of carpet installed over original vinyl asbestos tile adhesively applied to the concrete deck. There are also some asbestos containing sheet vinyl floor surfaces in select areas. Scope and Methodology The scope of architectural work included in this project is limited to: 1. Removing existing carpet and underlying asbestos containing materials and replacing them with new floor finish. 2. Provide cut, patch and paint activities as required to correct demolition necessitated by other mechanical and electrical work. 3. Develop a phasing strategy for implementing the work. Because virtually the entire building is occupied, improvements such as those contemplated will disrupt ongoing building activities. To minimize the disruption, the work will be phased. As part of the Project Agreement with Alaska Department of Education and Early Development, the KIBSD agreed to strike the existing single story classroom building (formerly a part of the Kodiak Aleutian Vocational School) from the list of KIB academic square footage. It can be used for AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 19 of 219 ARCHITECTURE  INTERIOR DESIGN  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 522 WEST 10TH STREET JUNEAU, ALASKA 99801 (907) 586-1070 FAX (907) 586-3959 www.jensenyorbalott.com PAGE 5 district offices, storage etc, but can no longer be used for academic purposes. This will allow the KIB offices to be relocated from their current space in the first floor of the Borough building as well as elsewhere in the district and consolidate them in the former academic space. This provides the opportunity to phase the KIB building improvements, allowing vacant sections to be completed and readied for occupants without disturbing other, occupied areas. Proposed Action The detailed scope of architectural work includes the following: 9. Complete a code analysis to confirm phasing and general configuration of the space planning work. 10. Update the floor plans so that they accurately reflect existing conditions. 11. Coordinate phasing of the work, including routing of replacement power and data cabling and panels, HVAC and controls. 12. Cutting walls, ceilings and floors as required to access plenums and other interstitial space for removal of existing systems to be replaced. All cutting to be accomplished under ACM procedures. 13. Patch and paint existing walls and ceilings after installation of new mechanical and electrical work. 14. Provide plan modifications as required to support the mechanical and electrical work. For instance, space may be needed for additional air handlers or data/com rooms . These spaces may need additional special provisions (such as cooling for data/com rooms). 15. Removal of existing flooring (including ACM finishes and mastics) and replacement with new finishes. 16. If warranted and requested, some space planning may be required if it is decided to re-configure the former school district spaces. Proposed Phasing We evaluated a number of ways to phase the work. The fact that a large area will be vacated by the school district provides flexibility in phasing and also significant opportunity for savings. After discussion with project management staff, the simplest and most cost effective phasing appears to be to use the vacant school district space as temporary office space for workers displaced by renovation work. For example, City of Kodiak personnel would temporarily move to the space vacated by the KIBSD while their original spaces are renovated, after which they would re-occupy their original space. Another tenant or department would then move into the former school district offices until their space is also renovated. The former school district space would be the last space renovated. That would allow AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 20 of 219 ARCHITECTURE  INTERIOR DESIGN  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 522 WEST 10TH STREET JUNEAU, ALASKA 99801 (907) 586-1070 FAX (907) 586-3959 www.jensenyorbalott.com PAGE 6 time for project management to determine who should occupy the vacated space and whether any space reconfiguration is warranted. The design team will prepare phasing plans as part of the design process for review and confirmation by project management and user groups. This process will include establishing locations and configurations of replacement equipment so that it can be brought on line in coordination with the phasing plan. In particular, Assembly meetings would need to be held in a temporary facility as there is no other space that can accommodate their regular meetings in the building. There are other meeting spaces available on the Borough Hill campus that could serve as temporary meeting space. MECHANICAL General Description: Much of the mechanical equipment is the age of the building and is overdue for replacement. Many items were identified in a 1995 report on the building that still need to be addressed. Deficiencies: 1. The existing Cleaver Brooks firetube boilers were identified as needing replacement in 1995. One of the boilers now has leaks in the tubing between the water chamber and the fire side of the tubes. This failure has taken one boiler out of service as this level of failure is beyond all but a highly specialized contractor to repair. As these boilers were installed in 1968 they are overdue for replacement with more efficient equipment. 2. The combustion air for the boilers and generator is inadequate. While the air openings are too small to begin with, they have been partially blocked off to prevent freezing pipes in the boiler room. Inadequate combustion air leads to poor efficiency of the boiler burners and sooting of the boiler. When the generator starts, its radiator fan will put a major exhaust draw on the room and draw it to negative pressure. This will exacerbate the combustion air problems with the boilers and with the generator itself. The generator should be relocated out of the boiler room and the combustion air openings should be reconfigured for proper air to the boilers. 3. There are two air handlers in the boiler room. One serves the assembly chambers and the other serves the data processing area in this wing of the building. The actual zones of coverage of the air handlers are uncertain as there are no mechanical plans available of the facility. These air handlers are manually controlled by the maintenance staff in response to user complaints since the pneumatic controls have failed. Maintenance staff has to start fans and pumps and manually set valves to achieve a moderate level of comfort AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 21 of 219 ARCHITECTURE  INTERIOR DESIGN  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 522 WEST 10TH STREET JUNEAU, ALASKA 99801 (907) 586-1070 FAX (907) 586-3959 www.jensenyorbalott.com PAGE 7 with these units. These handlers provide minimal cooling and likely little in the way of code-required ventilation as the outside air and relief openings are quite small and of insufficient size for economizer cooling. Additionally the outside air opening for one unit is sometimes blocked in the winter to prevent pipes from freezing. 4. The fuel oil day tank is the same age as the boilers and has few of the modern safeties to prevent overfilling or underfilling of the day tank. Additionally the day tank is not properly vented to the exterior as required by code. 5. There is an exhaust fan in the boiler room that appears to be thermostatically controlled. Exhaust fans will draw a boiler room negative and are consequently not allowed by code for cooling a boiler room. 6. There are a number of holes in the boiler room walls that are not fire stopped. Due to the size of the boilers, these walls are required to be 1-hour fire rated. 7. There are two rooftop units serving the east wing of the building. One serves the data processing area and was apparently added to improve cooling to the space in addition to the air handler in the boiler room. This unit had difficulty maintaining cool temperatures in the data space mostly due to lack of adequate control. The other unit serves the north side offices and seems to be fairly new and operational. 8. There is one air handler serving the two floors of the main wing of the facility. It has two reheat coils to control temperature of supply air to each floor of the facility individually. A small amount of air is supplied to each office. This unit is digitally controlled. a. The return air to this unit is brought out of each office into the hallways and back to a central grille at the mechanical room. This is a violation of the International Mechanical Code as a fire in the facility will draw products of combustion through the egress path of the facility. b. The digital controls on this unit use pneumatic transducers to operate pneumatic actuators on the valves and dampers of the air handler. These actuators are not as accurate as electronic actuators and are prone to failure due to their age. c. The supply air temperature is reset based upon one temperature sensor in the wing. The supply air temperature is cold to many occupants and there are a number of supply grilles that are taped over. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 22 of 219 ARCHITECTURE  INTERIOR DESIGN  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 522 WEST 10TH STREET JUNEAU, ALASKA 99801 (907) 586-1070 FAX (907) 586-3959 www.jensenyorbalott.com PAGE 8 d. The amount of air delivered by this air handler is small and it has little capacity to cool, so occupants complain of overly warm temperatures. e. There is a heat exchanger in this fan room that converts the hot water hydronic system to glycol in the air handler coil. There is no glycol makeup tank in the room to add glycol to this closed loop. There are also no reliable pressure gauges on the system to determine if the loop is full. 9. There are four mixing valves in the air handler room for the main office wing. These valves are digitally controlled to reset the temperature of the heating water to each wing and floor of the building individually. These will help the convectors keep from overheating the spaces on warmer days that only require a little heat. All four valves are using the same reset schedule because they cannot see the temperature in the wing office spaces and reset based upon what is happening in the wing offices. 10. Each perimeter office in the main wing has a hot water convector that is controlled by a capillary valve. Temperature control with this style valve is casual at best. Given the age of the convectors, their long term reliability cannot be assured. 11. All of the mechanical equipment and piping is original to the office remodel of this facility. As such it is well beyond the life span of typical mechanical systems and its future reliability is questionable. Proposed Action: Due to the age of the mechanical systems in this facility, a wholesale replacement of the systems is recommended. Replacing the current ventilation systems with variable air volume (VAV) systems would drastically improve occupant comfort. Should that not be in the practical budget limitations, the following items should be addressed: 1. The boilers should be replaced with higher efficiency reliable equipment. We recommend 3-pass oil-fired boilers for this facility. With the replacement of the boilers, we recommend replacement of the supporting pumps and fuel supply equipment. Since electric power is becoming less expensive in Kodiak, the owner may want to consider an air-to-water heat pump to heat the hydronic loop during lower load days to conserve fuel oil. 2. The air handler serving the assembly chambers should be replaced. The unit should be sized for proper ventilation as well as economizer cooling and feature automatic controls. This would allow proper thermal comfort in the assembly chambers and allow demolition of the noisy exhaust fan that serves the chambers for additional ventilation. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 23 of 219 ARCHITECTURE  INTERIOR DESIGN  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 522 WEST 10TH STREET JUNEAU, ALASKA 99801 (907) 586-1070 FAX (907) 586-3959 www.jensenyorbalott.com PAGE 9 3. The data processing area should have its two ventilation systems combined into one reliable one with digital control. It may be sufficient to upgrade the controls on the current rooftop unit and demolish the air handler in the boiler room. 4. The return air connections to the hallway in the main wing need to be removed. We recommend connecting each office to the above ceiling space and connecting the main return duct to this space and using the above ceiling area as a return plenum. 5. The convector control valves should be replaced with digital valves and thermostats. This would enable the control system for the air handler and the heating glycol to respond more accurately to the spaces as each space temperature and requested setpoint would be available to the system control. 6. The convectors in the offices are old and likely of lesser capacity than when installed. While replacing controls, replacement of the convectors would be a good move towards capacity improvement and system reliability. 7. We recommend several sections of heating and plumbing piping be removed from the system and investigated for possible corrosion and restriction issues. ELECTRICAL General Description: Power Distribution The KIB office building is supplied from an existing 250A, 480Y/277V, three phase, four wire, feeder that originates at pad mount switchgear with utility metering located on the south side of the learning center. The original feeder supplied the 480 volt MDP in the mechanical room. When the back-up generator was installed, the feeder was re-routed to the generator’s Automatic Transfer Switch (ATS), then back to the MDP via an enclosed 250A circuit breaker. Circuits and feeders fed from the MDP generally remain as originally designed. Back-up Generator AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 24 of 219 ARCHITECTURE  INTERIOR DESIGN  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 522 WEST 10TH STREET JUNEAU, ALASKA 99801 (907) 586-1070 FAX (907) 586-3959 www.jensenyorbalott.com PAGE 10 The existing back-up generator is a DMT Model DMT-200 rated 200KW/250KVA and is located in the mechanical room. The preliminary calculated KW/KVA for a standby generator sized to handle the estimated full load of the KIB Office Building and the Learning Center is 225KW/281KVA a 480Y/277V, 3 three phase, four wire. Lighting The lighting system throughout the building is supplied by 277 volt single- phase circuits. An Energy Audit Report was prepared in November 2011 that recommended replacement of the original T12 lamps and ballasts with T8 lamps and ballasts. The T12 Fluorescent lamps and ballasts in the original light fixtures have been replaced with T8 lamps and ballasts approximately two years ago. Data/Telecommunications The incoming copper service enters the building in the storage room below the stairs/ramp. The incoming copper service cabling is routed to and terminates on a telephone terminal backboard (TTB) in the storage room below the stairs. Telephone cabling is then is routed to the telephone equipment room # 111 and to terminal blocks in various locations throughout the building for distribution to offices. Data system originates in the Information Technology (IT) room. Data cabling is distributed to offices from the IT room via Cat 5 cabling. Kodiak City and School District have separate data systems within the building, when the school district moves their personnel to the new location the borough data/telecommunications infrastructure will need to be expanded. Maximum cable distance limitations will mandate the need for a Comm. room or rooms in the east/west wings of the facility. Input from the borough’s IT manager identified a preference for four data drops to each office terminated in RJ45 jacks mounted on a 4-gang plate. Fire Alarm The existing fire alarm system appears original to the building and consists of manual pull stations at exit doors, heat detectors located in some rooms in AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 25 of 219 ARCHITECTURE  INTERIOR DESIGN  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 522 WEST 10TH STREET JUNEAU, ALASKA 99801 (907) 586-1070 FAX (907) 586-3959 www.jensenyorbalott.com PAGE 11 the building, and a few notification appliances (horn/strobes) in some corridors. Per IBC, we assume this is a business (B) occupancy. The facility does not currently have fire suppression sprinkler protection. In accordance with IBC Section 907, a manual or automatic fire alarm system is not required based on current use and occupant load. Deficiencies Power Distribution Although the power distribution system including panelboards and feeders was adequate for the original use and occupancy of the building, however it has reached the end of its usable life with the exception two 225A, 208Y/120V 3 phase, 4 wire panelboards in the storage area under the stairs/ramp that were replaced. Back-up Generator The DMT Corporation is no longer in business and although there are vendors still selling parts, service and parts acquisition will become increasingly difficult. Location in the mechanical room is not ideal in light of the probable need for additional space for new boilers and associated pumps and controls. Lighting With a few exceptions the original light fixture layout remains and does not meet the current Illuminating Engineering Society (IES) guidelines for office space. The existing exterior canopy lighting has reached the end of useful life and should be replaced. Data/Telecommunications Maximum cable distance limitations will mandate the need for a Comm. room or rooms in the east and possibly west wings of the facility. Data and telecom cables are routed in the crawlspace with insufficient support. Fire Detection and Alarm System AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 26 of 219 ARCHITECTURE  INTERIOR DESIGN  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 522 WEST 10TH STREET JUNEAU, ALASKA 99801 (907) 586-1070 FAX (907) 586-3959 www.jensenyorbalott.com PAGE 12 Although a fire detection and system is not required for this facility, generally the National Fire alarm Code requires fire alarm system devices and wiring meet UL Listing requirements. The existing fire detection and alarm system including the fire alarm control panel, manual pull stations, detectors, and notification devices appear to be original to the building and have reached the end of usable life. The existing fire alarm system should be demolished. NFPA 90 requires that all air handlers with return air systems exceeding 2000 CFM be provided with duct mounted smoke detection. Proposed Action Power Distribution The preliminary calculation for electrical service to the building is 300 amps, minimum, at 480 volts, three phase, four wire. We would recommend a 400 Amp feeder be installed to ensure future capacity for expansion and growth of borough staff and services is available. Calculate existing and estimated future loads on existing panelboards and feeders for, general power in offices, lighting, and new mechanical equipment. Upgrade panelboards, feeders, and step down transformers based on calculated loads. Re-purpose an existing office on the first floor as an electrical room for 480/277 volt and 208/120 volt panels and transformers. Back-up Generator Provide a new pad mount standby generator in weatherproof enclosure adjacent to the existing utility transformer with new service equipment for the Learning Center, KIB Office Building, and Mental Health Building, mounted on or in the generator enclosure. Provide two new automatic transfer switches for normal and generator back- up supply to the Learning Center and KIB Office Building. The feeder to the Mental Health building will be supplied from new service equipment. Back-up power for the Mental Health building is not anticipated at this time. Lighting AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 27 of 219 ARCHITECTURE  INTERIOR DESIGN  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 522 WEST 10TH STREET JUNEAU, ALASKA 99801 (907) 586-1070 FAX (907) 586-3959 www.jensenyorbalott.com PAGE 13 Calculate light levels based on IES guidelines. Provide new energy efficient light fixtures throughout the office building. Re-use existing lighting fixtures where condition of fixtures are found to be adequate for current and future requirements. Provide occupancy/vacancy sensors in all offices, corridors, storage, and mechanical rooms. Provide new LED light fixtures in exterior canopies with photocell control. Data/Telecommunications Maintain the incoming copper cabling and TTB in storage room #142. Convert the existing telephone equipment room into a Comm. room for the first floor. Convert Room #209 on the second floor to a communications room for the second floor. Provide new racks with patch panels for field cabling, telephone, and data connections with switches for sending data to servers in the IT server room. Wire each work station in all offices with four each Cat 5e/6 data drops and jacks for data/telecommunications. Demolish all cables in ceilings and crawlspaces that are no longer in use. Adequately support cables to remain in crawlspace. Fire Detection and Alarm System Although a fire detection and system is not required for this facility the life safety reliability would be enhances through the installation of a fire detection and alarm system. Upgrade manual fire alarm system to include the following: • New fire alarm control panel (FACP) located at primary entrance to facility. • New remote annunciator at first responder entrance if different for primary entrance. • New addressable manual pull stations at all exits. • New heat detectors in mechanical room. • New duct mounted smoke detectors installed on air handler return ducts where return air is greater than 2000 CFM. • New notification appliances in corridors and KIB Assembly Chambers. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 28 of 219 ARCHITECTURE  INTERIOR DESIGN  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 522 WEST 10TH STREET JUNEAU, ALASKA 99801 (907) 586-1070 FAX (907) 586-3959 www.jensenyorbalott.com PAGE 14 G:\_Projects\13061\1Corr\pre design report\architectural.docx AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 29 of 219 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT Division 02 Section 02 26 00 KIB Administration Building Section 02 26 00 Mechanical Upgrades Page 1 of 29 LIMITED HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MECHANICAL UPGRADES KODIAK, ALASKA Surveyed March 24-25, 2020 Report Date April 23, 2020 EHS-ALASKA, INC. ENGINEERING, HEALTH & SAFETY CONSULTANTS 11901 BUSINESS BLVD., SUITE 208 EAGLE RIVER, ALASKA 99577-7701 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 30 of 219 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT Division 02 Section 02 26 00 KIB Administration Building Section 02 26 00 Mechanical Upgrades Page 2 of 29 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT KIB ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MECHANICAL UPGRADES & FORMER LEARNING CENTER KODIAK, ALASKA TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................................................... 3 A. GENERALIZED REQUIREMENTS FOR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS .............................................. 3 B. BUILDING DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................. 4 C. SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................. 6 1. Asbestos-Containing Materials ................................................................................................ 6 2. Lead-Containing Materials ....................................................................................................... 6 D. SURVEY RESULTS ........................................................................................................................... 7 1. Asbestos-Containing Materials ................................................................................................ 7 2. Asbestos in Dusts ................................................................................................................... 22 3. Lead-Containing Materials ..................................................................................................... 22 4. PCB-Containing Materials ...................................................................................................... 23 5. Mercury-Containing Materials ................................................................................................ 23 6. Other Hazardous Materials .................................................................................................... 24 E. REGULATORY CONSTRAINTS ...................................................................................................... 24 1. Asbestos-Containing Materials .............................................................................................. 24 2. Dusts with Asbestos ............................................................................................................... 25 3. Lead-Containing Materials ..................................................................................................... 25 4. PCB-Containing Materials ...................................................................................................... 26 5. Mercury-Containing Materials ................................................................................................ 26 6. Other Hazardous Materials .................................................................................................... 27 F. RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................................................... 27 1. Asbestos-Containing Materials .............................................................................................. 27 2. Dusts with Asbestos ............................................................................................................... 28 3. Lead-Containing Materials ..................................................................................................... 28 4. PCB-Containing Materials ...................................................................................................... 28 5. Mercury-Containing Materials ................................................................................................ 28 6. Other Hazardous Materials .................................................................................................... 28 G. LIMITATIONS ................................................................................................................................... 29 1. Accuracy of Information.......................................................................................................... 29 2. Site Conditions ....................................................................................................................... 29 3. Changing Regulatory Constraints .......................................................................................... 29 APPENDICES Appendix A ......................................................... Asbestos Bulk Field Survey Data Sheets and Lab Reports Appendix B .......................................................................................................... Lead Analyzer Test Results Appendix C ..................................................................................................... Drawings of Sample Locations AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 31 of 219 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT Division 02 Section 02 26 00 KIB Administration Building Section 02 26 00 Mechanical Upgrades Page 3 of 29 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT KIB ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MECHANICAL UPGRADES & FORMER LEARNING CENTER KODIAK, ALASKA OVERVIEW The Administration Building, located at 710 Mill Bay Road in Kodiak, Alaska, and portions of the adjacent Shop which was the former Learning Center, was surveyed for the presence of asbestos-containing materials (ACM), and other potentially hazardous materials as a part of the design services for the Mechanical Upgrades project for the Kodiak Island Borough. The survey was limited to the Boiler Room, Crawlspace, and the Fan Room as stated in Task I on proposal P20-006, dated 1/22/20. Task 2 included an indoor Air Quality Survey and those results are included as a separate report. Only the results of the hazardous materials survey are included in this report. The survey also provided a “good faith” inspection for hazardous materials that may be disturbed during the construction. The proposed work includes the disturbance, demolition, removal and disposal of lead-containing paints and/or lead-containing materials that is incidental to the renovation and remodeling project. Mr. Martin K. Schwan, Industrial Hygienist of EHS-Alaska, Inc. (EHS-Alaska) conducted the inspections in March 2020. A. GENERALIZED REQUIREMENTS FOR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Potentially hazardous materials have been identified in KIB Administration Building that will be affected by the proposed renovations. Those materials include asbestos, lead, polychlorinated bi-phenyls (PCBs), mercury, and radioactive materials. Not all materials were tested for potentially hazardous components, other potentially hazardous materials, including those exterior to the building, such as contamination from underground fuel tanks may be present, but are not part of this report. Buildings or portions of buildings that were constructed prior to 1978 which are residences, or contain day care facilities, kindergarten classes or other activities frequently visited by children under 6 years of age are classified as child occupied facilities. All work classified as “renovations” or disturbing more than 6 square feet of lead-based painted surfaces per room for interior activities or more than 20 square feet for exterior activities in child occupied facilities must comply with the requirements of 40 CFR 745. This building is not classified as a child occupied facility and therefore the requirements of 40 CFR 745 are not applicable. Only the materials that will be directly affected by this project are required to be removed. It is the Contractor’s responsibility to take this baseline data to coordinate and fully develop a hazardous materials removal design that will identify the presence, locations and quantities of asbestos and/or other hazardous materials that will be affected by this project. The removal and disposal of potentially hazardous materials are highly regulated, and it is anticipated that removal and disposal of asbestos, lead and chemical hazards will be conducted by a subcontractor to the general contractor who is qualified for such removal. It is anticipated that the general contractor and other trades will be able to conduct their work using engineering controls and work practices to control worker exposure and to keep airborne contaminants out of occupied areas of the building. Refer to Section 01 35 45, Airborne Contaminant Control. Settled and concealed dusts in areas not subject to routine cleaning are present throughout the building, including the roof, and inside and on top of architectural, mechanical, electrical, and structural elements, and those dusts are assumed to contain regulated air contaminants. This should not be read to imply that there is an existing hazard to building occupants (normal occupants of the building as opposed to construction workers working in the affected areas). However, depending on the specific work items involved and on the means and methods employed when working in the affected areas, construction workers could be exposed to regulated air contaminants from those dusts in excess of the OSHA Permissible Exposure Limits (PELs). AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 32 of 219 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT Division 02 Section 02 26 00 KIB Administration Building Section 02 26 00 Mechanical Upgrades Page 4 of 29 The settled and concealed dusts were examined by an EPA Certified Building Inspector but were not sampled. The inspector determined that the dusts are not “asbestos debris” from an asbestos-containing building material (ACBM). Based on similar sampling from similar buildings, the inspector also determined that the dusts are unlikely to contain more than one percent (1%) asbestos by weight, and therefore are not an asbestos-containing material (ACM). Reference 40 CFR 763.83. NOTE: Asbestos-containing debris was identified from damaged pipe insulation at the floor penetration in the front right corner of the fan room and it was confirmed to contain 30% Amosite. Asbestos-containing pipe insulation debris from physically damaged pipe insulation, from water damaged pipe insulation, and from assumed repairs to piping was also noted in several areas of the Administration building crawlspace, and in the crawlspace of the (former) Learning Center building now used as a shop. Access to the crawlspace should be limited to personnel with proper asbestos training and PPE, including respirators. B. BUILDING DESCRIPTION The survey included portions of Kodiak Island Borough Administration Building and the adjacent Shop previously identified as the Learning Center that will be affected by the proposed mechanical Upgrades Project Kodiak Island Borough Administration Building. The KIB Administration Building was originally constructed in 1968-69 as a 152 pupil student dormitory for the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA). The building consists of a 2-story (reference) north wing aligned east to west, and a 1-story (reference) south wing that sits at the same elevation as the second level of the north wing. Both wings have a crawlspace partitioned up by poured concrete foundation walls. It was converted into an office building circa 1996 and occupied by the Kodiak Island Borough, but few changes have been made since its original construction. The exterior walls and primary partitions in the building were concrete masonry units (CMU). The exterior CMU is assumed to have asbestos-containing vermiculite in the open “cells” of the CMU blocks. The exterior CMU was covered at some time by painted cedar lap siding and metal along the perimeter soffit. The exterior concrete foundation walls have “blue board” foam insulation glued on with a non-ACM mastic located on the interior side of the crawlspace, and exposed painted concrete on the exterior side. The roof was typically of steel beams and open web steel joists supporting a concrete deck. The roof was PVC and matched the roof noted on the former Learning Center now used as a shop which was surveyed by EHS- Alaska in 2012 for the demolition of east half of the building and the roof core samples did not contain asbestos. The rain leaders have asbestos-containing insulation and there may be hidden asbestos- containing insulation on piping in the attic space and walls. Cement asbestos board (CAB) was noted on the exterior walls above and below windows and under the soffit. Windows with broken seals were noted throughout the building. Walls along the corridor are CMU as are walls separating the fan room, restrooms, plumbing chases, and utility rooms from adjacent offices. Walls separating offices were typically framed gypsum wallboard walls with integrated bookshelves and closets left over from the original construction with exposed or covered with carpet original vinyl asbestos 9”x9” floor tiles (VAT) with ACM black mastic. The joint compound in gypsum wallboard systems was reported to be asbestos-containing; and textures, where present, are assumed to contain asbestos. Ceilings were typically of 2’ x 4’ acoustic ceiling tiles or gypsum wallboard. Floors had a variety of different carpets with most showing signs of wear and tear. Carpet was placed over the original ACM 9”x9” VAT. Some areas were noted with a sheet vinyl such as the 2nd level restrooms that was reported to be ACM. Other rooms such as Conference Room 116, had both carpet and laminate flooring assumed to have been placed over the original 9”x9” VAT. The building was heated by a hydronic heating system combined with various fan coil units supplying ventilation and heating. The heating and domestic water piping was typically insulated with fiberglass with AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 33 of 219 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT Division 02 Section 02 26 00 KIB Administration Building Section 02 26 00 Mechanical Upgrades Page 5 of 29 "hard and chalky" asbestos-containing insulation at fittings in the crawl space. Some abatement of ACM pipe insulation was noted in the crawlspace particularly along the (reference) north side of the crawlspace on the lines running between the main heat piping and the branch leading to the room above. Newer black foam rubber insulation was noted on those leaders. The crawlspace under the (reference) south portion of the building (portion with the Assembly Chamber) was noted to have ACM hard fittings on heat piping and we noted ACM insulation debris as well as actual large pieces of hard fitting insulation on the ground of the crawlspace. The asbestos debris was also noted to have been washed into the gravel by periodic ground water flooding. The north portion of the crawlspace has pooling ground water and there is a vapor barrier ground covering but it is covered with crushed rock apparently brought in at some unknown date – perhaps to raise the ground level above the pooling water. The sump pump noted at the west access hatch of the north building portion crawlspace was not hooked up. We recommend that only authorized personnel with PPE enter the crawlspace. The crawlspace access hatches were secured but the hatches are not tight fitting and we recommend proper gasketed hatches. A mixture of fiberglass insulation and ACM hard fitting insulation was noted on piping in both the fan room and the boiler room, but it appeared that the insulation was fiberglass insulation in the plumbing chases, but access was very limited and therefore we assume some ACM insulation will be present in the plumbing chases and in inaccessible areas such as in walls and the ceiling or attic spaces. Learning Center The "Shop" building was designed and built under the same contract as the Dormitory Facilities in 1968- 69, and originally had food and general storage in the West half, and a kitchen and dining facility in the East half. It is presumed to have been built by the same contractor using basically the same materials in both facilities. The "Shop" building was being used as a "Learning Center" when surveyed for the 2012/2013 renovation, and that reference is repeated here, in the previous 2012 sampling data copied herein. The east half of the Learning Center was demolished during the Kodiak High School Addition and Renovation project in 2012-2013. The remaining portion of the building is currently being used as a shop for the Kodiak Island Borough, and this survey was largely limited to the boiler room and the crawlspace. Limited sampling was performed in room 110 however, because there is a water leak somewhere above the ceiling resulting in damage to the 9”x9” VAT and mastic which were loose, and the gypsum wallboard system which revealed signs and symptoms of past water intrusion in room 110 and the storage closet on the wall common to the corridor, but which was currently dry. KIB was specifically interested in sampling in room110 before they commenced with repairs. The exterior walls and primary partitions in the former Learning Center (shop) building were concrete masonry units (CMU) on a poured concrete foundation and footer. The exterior CMU walls had an asbestos-containing vermiculite "block-fill" in the CMU "cells". There is no exterior cladding over the CMU walls, but they had been painted since the 2012 survey. The metal framed windows were inset in the CMU and only one window had CAB below it which is located on the (reference) west side, left of the west facing entrance to the shop. The roof was typically of steel beams and open web steel joists supporting a concrete deck. The roof was PVC and matched the roof that was present on the east portion of the building which was surveyed by EHS- Alaska for the demolition of the east half of the building and the roof core samples did not contain asbestos. A metal siding fascia was noted on the exterior soffit, but unlike the Administration Building, EHS-Alaska did not note CAB on the underside of the soffit which was covered with metal panels which likely covers the original cement asbestos board soffit. It may be concealed but it was not visible at the two areas where the metal siding on the soffit on the west side (center and SE corner) had visible damage presumably from backing vehicles. A mixture of CMU and framed gypsum wallboard was typically used in the interior partitions. We noted the same beige 4x4 ceramic wall tiles, found to contain up to 0.75% Chrysotile asbestos in the gray “ mortar” but not in the white “grout,” was present. Fiber reinforced plastic (FRP) was noted on the wall at the urinal in the men’s restroom. Ceilings were typically of gypsum wallboard with 12x12 glue-on ceiling tiles in the shop office, break room, and rooms 109 and 110 and was also noted in the east portion that was demolished in 2012. The “puck” mastic and ceiling tile in room 110 did not contain asbestos. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 34 of 219 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT Division 02 Section 02 26 00 KIB Administration Building Section 02 26 00 Mechanical Upgrades Page 6 of 29 Floor finishes were bare concrete in the shop storage area, painted concrete in the shop work area, and ceramic tiles in the restrooms, janitor’s closet, storage rooms, and portions of the hall. The building was heated by a hydronic heating system combined with ceiling mounted unit heaters in the workshop and main storage room. The heating and domestic water piping was typically insulated with fiberglass with "hard and chalky" asbestos-containing insulation at fittings in the crawl space. C. SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS 1. Asbestos-Containing Materials The survey included sampling of suspect ACM materials that had not been sampled in prior asbestos surveys, or samples of materials where previous sampling had been inconsistent. Refer to the AHERA asbestos management plan available for review in the KIB Engineering Facilities Department office for information on previous sampling not included in this report. Additional testing of materials pertinent to the mechanical upgrades project, including asbestos and lead was conducted and is included in this report. The samples were analyzed for the presence of asbestos by polarized light microscopy (PLM), the method of analysis recommended by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to determine the composition of suspected asbestos-containing materials (EPA method 600/M4-82-020). Only materials containing more than 1% total asbestos were classified as “asbestos-containing” based on EPA and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) criteria. Samples that were analyzed to have less than 10% asbestos were “point-counted” by the laboratory for more accuracy. Samples that are listed as having a “Trace by Point Count” had asbestos fibers found in the material, but the fibers were not present at the counting grids. Table 1 in Part D below contains a summary list of the asbestos bulk samples and the applicable results. The Bulk Asbestos samples were analyzed for asbestos content by International Asbestos Testing Laboratories (IATL), Mt. Laurel, New Jersey a National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) accredited laboratory. EPA regulations under 40 CFR 763 requires the use of Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) to determine whether or not a material contains asbestos. While PLM analysis does a good job for most materials, it does have some limitations, both in the size of the fibers that are visible under a standard optical microscope, and because the organic matrix that the fibers are bound within can obscure the fibers. At the discretion of the building inspector and the client, some types of samples may be analyzed or re-analyzed by what is called TEM NOB, or Transmission Electron Microscopy for Non-Friable Organically Bound materials. TEM NOB is the definitive method for determining if asbestos is present, but TEM NOB use is not required by the EPA. TEM NOB analysis was not done for this project. Field survey data sheets and laboratory reports of the bulk samples are included in Appendix A. Drawings showing sample locations are included as Appendix B. 2. Lead-Containing Materials Nearly all surfaces in the building were coated with paint and most surfaces had been repainted. EHS- Alaska tested paint throughout the affected areas of the building using an Heuresis Pb200i X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) lead paint analyzer (Serial # 1770 with software version 4.0-21). Refer to the Lead Paint Screening Table in Appendix B that identifies the surfaces tested, and the results. All surfaces affected by this project may not have been tested and therefore additional sampling may be required to refute the presence of lead-based paints in child occupied facilities regulated by 40 CFR 745. The Paint Test Locations are shown in Appendix C. EHS-Alaska had previously tested paint throughout the now demolished portion of the former Learning Center using a Niton XLi303AW X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) lead paint analyzer (Serial # 14311 with software version 5.2C) and those results are included in Appendix B for reference purposes for comparison AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 35 of 219 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT Division 02 Section 02 26 00 KIB Administration Building Section 02 26 00 Mechanical Upgrades Page 7 of 29 to the results in the portion of the former Learning Center now used as a shop. All surfaces affected by this project may not have been tested and therefore additional sampling may be required to refute the presence of lead-based paints prior to disturbance. The Paint Test Locations are shown in Appendix C EPA and the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) have defined lead-based paint as any paint or other surface coating that contains lead equal to or in excess of 1.0 milligram per square centimeter (mg/cm2) or 0.5 percent by weight. XRF results are classified as positive (lead is present at 1.0 mg/cm2 or greater), negative (less than 1.0 mg/cm2 of lead was present) or inconclusive (the XRF could not make a conclusive positive or negative determination). Tests that were invalid due to operator error are shown as void tests. A Performance Characteristic Sheet (PCS) for the Heuresis Pb200i and the Niton XLi303AW are available upon request. This PCS data provides supplemental information to be used in conjunction with Chapter 7 of the “HUD Guidelines”. Performance parameters provided in the PCS are applicable when operating the instrument using the manufacturer’s instructions and the procedures described in Chapter 7 of the “HUD Guidelines”. The instrument was operated in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions and Chapter 7 of the HUD Guidelines. No substrate correction is required for this instrument. There is no inconclusive classification for this instrument when using the 1.0 mg/cm2 threshold. D. SURVEY RESULTS 1. Asbestos-Containing Materials The following Table 1A lists the samples taken in March 2020 in the boiler room, fan room, and crawlspace in the KIB administration Building located at 710 Mill Bay Road, and the results of the laboratory analysis. Asbestos field survey data sheets and laboratory reports are included as Appendix A. Refer to Appendix C for sample locations. TABLE 1A SAMPLE NUMBER MATERIAL LOCATION ASBESTOS CONTENT KIB0320-A01 Fibrous woven rope gasket Admin Bldg: Boiler RM inner gasket on front metal section of the #1 Cleaver Brooks Oil fired boiler Model CBH186-50A oil fired boiler DOM 12/9/1968. Photo 429 None detected KIB0320-A02 Gun sight gasket – brown, appears laminated Admin Bldg: Boiler RM gasket on outer housing at the gun sight on #1 Cleaver Brooks Oil fired boiler. Photo 434 None detected KIB0320-A03 Fibrous woven rope gasket Admin Bldg: Boiler RM gasket on backside metal section of the #21 Cleaver Brooks Oil fired boiler. Photo 435 None detected KIB0320-A04 Gasket - ~1/8” thick rigid, brittle brown gasket Admin Bldg: Boiler RM on circulating pump mounted on back CMU wall, right of crawlspace access hatch, on lower flange. Photo 445 None detected KIB0320-A05 Gasket - ~1/8” thick rigid, brittle brown gasket Admin Bldg: Boiler RM on circulating pump mounted on back CMU wall, right of crawlspace access hatch, on upper flange. Photo 446 None detected AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 36 of 219 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT Division 02 Section 02 26 00 KIB Administration Building Section 02 26 00 Mechanical Upgrades Page 8 of 29 SAMPLE NUMBER MATERIAL LOCATION ASBESTOS CONTENT KIB0320-A06 Rope gasket (used) Admin Bldg: Boiler RM – 1 of 2 gaskets hanging on wall below and to the left of fire alarm panel on south wall, appears to have been removed from boiler #2. Photo 448 None detected KIB0320-A07 Flat flexible black (used) gasket Admin Bldg: Boiler RM – 2 of 2 gaskets hanging on wall below and to the left of fire alarm panel on south wall, appears to have been removed from boiler #2. Photo 448 50% Chrysotile KIB0320-A08 Rope gasket (used) – white fibrous, woven Admin Bldg: Boiler RM – on round metal lid which may have been removed and replaced from boiler #2, see photo 449 of section leaning against generator near boiler #2. Still on metal section. Photo 452 None detected KIB0320-A09 Valve gasket – hard, black Admin Bldg: Boiler RM – on boiler #2 side of gate valve above and between boiler #2 and generator. Photo 457 50% Chrysotile KIB0320-A10 Gasket with red fiber re- enforced outer covering and black brittle core Admin Bldg: Boiler RM on DMT Corporation AC Generator Model DMT-2000 vertical gasket between the top housing above the fan and the fan housing. Photos 484, 485 None detected KIB0320-A11 Fibrous soft black gasket Admin Bldg: Boiler RM on DMT Corporation AC Generator Model DMT-2000 on the top section of the heat exchanger. Photo 486, See also 485. 50% Chrysotile KIB0320-A12 Woven gasket - white Admin Bldg: Boiler RM on DMT Corporation AC Generator Model DMT-2000 between the red fan housing and the sheet metal flange. Photo 497, 496 None detected KIB0320-A13 White friable debris Admin Bldg: Fan RM on top surface of horizontal portion of ducting, west (left) side of door ~8’ AFF, running N-S. Photo 834 None detected KIB0320-A14 Flange gasket – pliable with fibers Admin Bldg: Fan RM on circulating pump #4, top flange on east wall (right). Photo 858 40% Chrysotile KIB0320-A15 Remnant HF debris Admin Bldg: Fan RM SE corner (right of door) on bare copper pipe ~2” at 22.5 deg bend near floor sleeve at floor penetration. Photo 859 30% Amosite KIB0320-A16 Black woven vibration cloth on ~14”x20” duct Admin Bldg: Fan RM vertical portion of 14x20 duct to the left of door. Photo 863 None detected AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 37 of 219 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT Division 02 Section 02 26 00 KIB Administration Building Section 02 26 00 Mechanical Upgrades Page 9 of 29 SAMPLE NUMBER MATERIAL LOCATION ASBESTOS CONTENT KIB0320-A17 Off-white paper-like gasket Admin Bldg: Fan RM on 25 1/2”x48” PACE duct – front flange of duct. Inside door, 6.5’ AFF. Photo 875 30% Chrysotile KIB0320-A18 Off-white paper-like gasket Admin Bldg: Fan RM on 25 1/2”x48” PACE duct – heat exchanger side of duct on flange. Inside door, 6.5’ AFF Photo 879 35% Chrysotile KIB0320-A19 Hard, black gasket with fibers Admin Bldg: Fan RM Top flange of circulating pump #6. Photo 881 50% Chrysotile KIB0320-A20 Tan duct pin mastic Admin Bldg: Fan RM Vertical ducting on back wall, left side on ducting ~40”x160”. Photo 882 5.5% Chrysotile KIB0320-A21 Tan duct pin mastic Admin Bldg: Fan RM Vertical ducting on back wall, left side on ducting ~40”x160”. Photo 883 6.3% Chrysotile KIB0320-A22 Black woven fabric vibration cloth Admin Bldg: Fan RM Vertical ducting on back wall, left side on ~20”x20”duct at the “Y” on horizontal portion. Photo 889 None detected KIB0320-A23 Hard green mastic Crawlspace access from boiler room, along exterior wall between concrete and 1” blue foam insulation, in section to the north of the boiler room, west end of north wall None detected KIB0320-A24 Hard green mastic Crawlspace access from west access point in the long section of the building, along exterior wall between concrete and 1” blue foam insulation. None detected The testing method used (polarized light microscopy [PLM]) is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in floor coverings and similar non-friable organically bound materials. Before this material can be considered or treated as non-asbestos containing, confirmation should be made by quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Table 1B includes samples taken in March 2020 in the former Learning Center now used as a shop, and the results of the laboratory analysis. Asbestos field survey data sheets and laboratory reports are included in Appendix A. Refer to Appendix C for sample locations. TABLE 1B SAMPLE NUMBER MATERIAL LOCATION ASBESTOS CONTENT KLC0320-A25 Brown, brittle, cove base mastic. Lab also identified joint compound. Former Learning Center: Room 110, inside door on corner of the north GWB wall on the right. Photo 1703 Brown Mastic = None detected, Joint compound = 1.8% Chrysotile KLC0320-A26 Brown Cove Base (CB-1) 4” brittle Former Learning Center: Room 110, inside door on corner of the north GWB wall on the right. Photo 1704 None detected AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 38 of 219 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT Division 02 Section 02 26 00 KIB Administration Building Section 02 26 00 Mechanical Upgrades Page 10 of 29 SAMPLE NUMBER MATERIAL LOCATION ASBESTOS CONTENT KLC0320-A27 Fibrous gasket Former Learning Center Boiler Room: back side housing on boiler #2 Photo 1626 80% Chrysotile KLC0320-A28 Fibrous woven rope gasket Former Learning Center Boiler Room: front side housing on boiler #2 Photo 1629 None detected KLC0320-A29 Flange gasket – off-white, Former Learning Center Boiler Room: Boiler #2 on exhaust stack flange just above boiler Photo 1630 40% Chrysotile KLC0320-A30 Flat hard black gasket Former Learning Center Boiler Room: Boiler #2 on hot water out, on flange right above boiler. Photo 1633 60% Chrysotile KLC0320-A31 Reddish-brown Former Learning Center Boiler Room: Boiler #2 on flange for the low water cut-off valve. Photo 1635 None detected KLC0320-A32 Hard, brittle pipe thread sealant Former Learning Center Boiler Room: Boiler #2 on AIRTROL Boiler Fitting pipe section on threads, top side. Photo 1638 None detected KLC0320-A33 Hard, brittle pipe thread sealant Former Learning Center Boiler Room: Boiler #2 on 3” threaded piping for hot water supply. Photo 1645 None detected KLC0320-A34 Duct pin mastic - yellowish Former Learning Center Boiler Room: right above door on insulated air intake ducting front face, right end Photo 1658 3.5% Chrysotile KLC0320-A35 Duct pin mastic - yellowish Former Learning Center Boiler Room: right above door on insulated air intake ducting bottom side, right end Photo 1659 3.1% Chrysotile KLC0320-A36 White joint compound Former Learning Center Boiler Room: SE portion on ceiling on paper tape on GWB. Photo 1669 1.8% Chrysotile KLC0320-A37 Reddish flange gasket – hard, brittle Former Learning Center Boiler Room: West wall on flange above circulating pump #1. Photo 1670 None detected KLC0320-A38 Black flange gasket ~1/8” thick– rubbery Former Learning Center Boiler Room: West wall on flange below circulating pump #1. Photo 1671 None detected KLC0320-A39 Reddish flange gasket – hard, brittle Former Learning Center Boiler Room: West wall on flange above circulating pump #2. Photo 1678 None detected KLC0320-A40 Black flange gasket ~1/8” thick– hard Former Learning Center Boiler Room: West wall on flange above circulating pump #3. Photo 1683 60% Chrysotile KLC0320-A41 Off-white gasket, with red paint – do not analyze the paint Former Learning Center Boiler Room: West end of north wall. Photo 1692 60% Chrysotile AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 39 of 219 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT Division 02 Section 02 26 00 KIB Administration Building Section 02 26 00 Mechanical Upgrades Page 11 of 29 SAMPLE NUMBER MATERIAL LOCATION ASBESTOS CONTENT KLC0320-A42 12x12 glue-on ceiling tiles with aligned fissures, and medium density of 1/16 & 1/8 inch holes, brown hard and brittle puck mastic Former Learning Center Room 110: Ceiling SW quadrant on untextured GWB with screws Photo 1697 None detected – both layers KLC0320-A43 White joint compound and GWB Former Learning Center Room 110: West wall, right corner. Photo 1700 None detected KLC0320-A44 White joint compound Former Learning Center Room 110: North wall, bottom at outside corner. May be repair for water damaged. Photo 1702 None detected The testing method used (polarized light microscopy [PLM]) is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in floor coverings and similar non-friable organically bound materials. Before this material can be considered or treated as non-asbestos containing, confirmation should be made by quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Table 1C includes samples taken in April 2012 in the portion of the former Learning Center that was demolished during the Kodiak High School Addition and Renovation Project at the school for the Kodiak Island Borough School District in 2012-2013 and is included here for reference purposes. Note, although some of these materials were removed when the west half of the building was demolished, no work took place in the east half, so similar materials are still present there.. It confirms that materials such as the original 9”x9” VAT floor tile and mastic, pipe fitting insulation, vermiculite block fill, wire insulation, dampproofing, duct pin mastics, penetration sealants, joint compound and grout/mortar of ceramic tiles were asbestos-containing. Asbestos field survey data sheets and laboratory reports are included in Appendix A. Refer to Appendix C for sample locations. TABLE 1C SAMPLE NUMBER MATERIAL LOCATION ASBESTOS CONTENT KHS-LC-0412- A01 2 mm Bi-layer (Gray & White) Detail Membrane Under Roof Drain Cap, west of center of east half of building. Photo 0007 None Detected Both Layers KHS-LC-0412- A02 1 mm gray PVC membrane with integrated woven re- enforcement. Outer roof layer of roof assembly. Core 1 first layer. Roof at ~10’ in from NW corner of east half of building. Photo 0020 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A03 ½ to ¾ inch thick white fibrous & chalky gypsum like layer in PVC roof assembly Core 1 second layer. Roof at ~10’ in from NW corner of east half of building. Photo 0020 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A04 Brown-black fibrous paper thin insulation covering of sample A05 in the PVC roof assembly with foam insulation Core 1 third layer. Roof at ~10’ in from NW corner of east half of building. Photo 0020 None Detected Both Layers KHS-LC-0412- A05 2” off-white rigid roof insulation in PVC roof assembly Core 1 fourth layer. Roof at ~10’ in from NW corner of east half of building. Photo 0020 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A06 Brown-black fibrous paper thin insulation covering of sample A05 in the PVC roof assembly with foam insulation Core 1 fifth layer. Roof at ~10’ in from NW corner of east half of building. Photo 0020 None Detected Both Layers KHS-LC-0412- A07 Brown-black fibrous paper thin insulation covering of sample A08 in the PVC roof assembly with foam insulation Core 1 sixth layer. Roof at ~10’ in from NW corner of east half of building. Photo 0020 None Detected Both Layers AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 40 of 219 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT Division 02 Section 02 26 00 KIB Administration Building Section 02 26 00 Mechanical Upgrades Page 12 of 29 SAMPLE NUMBER MATERIAL LOCATION ASBESTOS CONTENT KHS-LC-0412- A08 2” off-white rigid roof insulation in PVC roof assembly Core 1 seventh layer. Roof at ~10’ in from NW corner of east half of building. Photo 0020 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A09 Brown-black fibrous paper thin insulation covering of sample A08 in the PVC roof assembly with foam insulation Core 1 eighth layer. Roof at ~10’ in from NW corner of east half of building. Photo 0020 None Detected Both Layers KHS-LC-0412- A10 Brown-black fibrous paper thin insulation covering of sample A11 in the PVC roof assembly with foam insulation Core 1 ninth layer. Roof at ~10’ in from NW corner of east half of building. Photo 0020 None Detected Both Layers KHS-LC-0412- A11 2” off-white rigid roof insulation in PVC roof assembly Core 1 tenth layer. Roof at ~10’ in from NW corner of east half of building. Photo 0020 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A12 Brown-black fibrous paper thin insulation covering of sample A11 above the plastic vapor barrier with foam insulation Core 1 eleventh layer. Roof at ~10’ in from NW corner of east half of building. Photo 0020 None Detected Both Layers KHS-LC-0412- A13 Black tar layer from roof deck Core 1 twelfth layer. Roof at ~10’ in from NW corner of east half of building. Photo 0019 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A14 1 mm gray PVC membrane with integrated woven re- enforcement. Outer roof layer of roof assembly. Core 2 first layer. Roof at ~20’ in from NW corner of east half of building. Photo 0032 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A15 ½ to ¾ inch thick white fibrous & chalky gypsum like layer in PVC roof assembly Core 2 second layer. Roof at ~20’ in from NW corner of east half of building. Photo 0032 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A16 1/8 inch thick white closed cell foam Core 2 third layer. Roof at ~20’ in from NW corner of east half of building. Photo 0032 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A17 Brown-black fibrous paper thin insulation covering of sample A18 in the PVC roof assembly with foam insulation Core 2 fourth layer. Roof at ~20’ in from NW corner of east half of building. Photo 0032 None Detected Both Layers KHS-LC-0412- A18 2” off-white rigid roof insulation in PVC roof assembly Core 2 fifth layer. Roof at ~20’ in from NW corner of east half of building. Photo 0032 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A19 Brown-black fibrous paper thin insulation covering of sample A18 in the PVC roof assembly with foam insulation Core 2 sixth layer. Roof at ~20’ in from NW corner of east half of building. Photo 0032 None Detected Both Layers KHS-LC-0412- A20 Brown-black fibrous paper thin insulation covering & 2” off- white rigid roof insulation in the PVC roof assembly Core 2 seventh and eighth layers. Roof at ~20’ in from NW corner of east half of building. Photo 0032 None Detected Both Layers KHS-LC-0412- A21 Brown-black fibrous paper thin insulation covering of sample A20 in the PVC roof assembly with foam insulation Core 2 ninth layer. Roof at ~20’ in from NW corner of east half of building. Photo 0032 None Detected Both Layers AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 41 of 219 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT Division 02 Section 02 26 00 KIB Administration Building Section 02 26 00 Mechanical Upgrades Page 13 of 29 SAMPLE NUMBER MATERIAL LOCATION ASBESTOS CONTENT KHS-LC-0412- A22 Brown-black fibrous paper thin insulation covering & 2” off- white rigid roof insulation above the plastic vapor barrier Core 2 20th & 11th layer. Roof at ~20’ in from NW corner of east half of building. Photo 0032 None Detected Both Layers KHS-LC-0412- A23 Black tar layer from roof deck Core 2 twelfth layer. Roof at ~20’ in from NW corner of east half of building. Photo 0032 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A24 Gray sealant between metal fascia panels Roof fascia at the west end of the south wall of the middle portion of the building in the area of the boiler room. Photo 0056 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A25 Brown mastic to acoustical ceiling tile and ceiling tile Ceiling at south side of entrance lobby Photo 0421 None Detected Both Layers KHS-LC-0412- A26 Gypsum board above acoustical ceiling tile Ceiling at south side of entrance lobby Photo 0421 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A27 Tan acoustical ceiling tile. ACT-1: 12”x12” with directionally aligned fissures to 11/2”, 1/16 & 1/8” even distribution of holes Ceiling at south side of entrance lobby Photo 0430 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A28 Tan mastic to wood panel and white painted CMU Lower south side wall above cove base in entrance lobby Photo 0431 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A29 Dark brown cove base South side wall at corner in entrance lobby Photo 0432 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A30 Tan mastic to brown cove base and wood paneling South side wall at corner in entrance lobby Photo 0432 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A31 Floor Tile with black mastic: FT-1: 12”x12” light brown with white and shades of brown patterns. East of north entrance door in lobby Photo 0434 None Detected Both Layers KHS-LC-0412- A32 Unknown floor tile with dark mastic from under sample A31 with black mastic from FT-1– probably original 9”x9” floor tile below East of north entrance door in lobby Photo 0435 Orig. FT-3.7% Chrysotile Orig. BM – 3.5% Chrysotile New BM – None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A33 Tan mastic to wood paneling and joint compound East of north entrance door in lobby - Photo 0436 Mastic – None Detected JC – 1.7% Chrysotile KHS-LC-0412- A34 Painted cement plaster and finish coat on ceiling South side storage room 105 at ceiling abandoned duct penetration. Photo 448 None Detected Both Layers KHS-LC-0412- A35 Remnant white joint compound on beige ceramic tile South side storage room 105 on south wall. Photo 449 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A36 Wire insulation in light fixture South side storage room 105 in light fixture mounted on ceiling (center). Photo 455 50% Chrysotile AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 42 of 219 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT Division 02 Section 02 26 00 KIB Administration Building Section 02 26 00 Mechanical Upgrades Page 14 of 29 SAMPLE NUMBER MATERIAL LOCATION ASBESTOS CONTENT KHS-LC-0412- A37 White light ballast support string South side storage room 105 in light fixture mounted on ceiling (center). Photo 457 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A38 White light lens support string South side storage room 105 in light fixture mounted on ceiling (center). Photo 459 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A39 White joint compound on ceiling repair South side storage room 105 on ceiling ~4’ inside door, from north to south wall. Photo 461 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A40 Grout from 4”x 4” beige ceramic tile South side storage room 105 at light switch on north wall. Photo 465 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A41 Gray mortar from 4”x 4” beige ceramic tile South side storage room 105 at light switch on north wall. Photo 465 0.5% Chrysotile KHS-LC-0412- A42 Unpainted white joint compound South side storage room 105 north wall at in-filled abandoned door. Photo 466 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A43 Unpainted gypsum wall board South side storage room 105 north wall at in-filled abandoned door. Photo 466 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A44 Brown mastic to brown cove base and gypsum board with possible paint chips (gypsum board not analyzed) South side storage room 105 inside west closet. Photo 467 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A45 Brown cove base South side storage room 105 inside west closet. Photo 467 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A46 Grout from quarry tile on floor South side storage room 105 inside west closet. Photo 468 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A47 Newer yellow mastic with older brown mastic to cove base North abandoned arctic entry housing the safe Photo 470 None Detected Both Layers KHS-LC-0412- A48 Tan carpet mastic on 9”x9” tiles North abandoned arctic entry housing the safe Photo 472 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A49 Original tan 9”x9” floor tile under carpet with tan carpet mastic (top) and remnant black mastic (bottom) (black mastic not analyzed) North abandoned arctic entry housing the safe Photo 472 FT – 5.1% Chrysotile Tan Mastic – None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A50 Black mastic to original 9”x9” floor tiles North abandoned arctic entry housing the safe Photo 472 3.6% Chrysotile KHS-LC-0412- A51 Joint compound on exterior door fill North abandoned arctic entry housing the safe Photo 475 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A52 Gypsum board on exterior door fill North abandoned arctic entry housing the safe Photo 475 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A53 Tan fabric wall panel backing North abandoned arctic entry housing the safe Photo 477 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A54 Newer brown cove base North abandoned arctic entry housing the safe Photo 478 None Detected AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 43 of 219 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT Division 02 Section 02 26 00 KIB Administration Building Section 02 26 00 Mechanical Upgrades Page 15 of 29 SAMPLE NUMBER MATERIAL LOCATION ASBESTOS CONTENT KHS-LC-0412- A55 Splotchy wall texture Main Office. Photo 480 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A56 Acoustical ceiling tile. ACT- 1:Tan 12”x12” with directionally aligned fissures to 11/2”, 1/16 & 1/8” even distribution of holes Main Office. Photo 481 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A57 Brown mastic to ACT-1 In Director’s Office. Photo 485 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A58 Acoustical ceiling tile. ACT-1: Tan 12”x12” with directionally aligned fissures to 11/2”, 1/16 & 1/8” even distribution of holes In Director’s Office. Photo 485 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A59 Gypsum board Above ACT-1 in Director’s Office. Photo 485 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A60 Lay-in ceiling tile (2x4 East – West aligned with 2” fissures) In Director’s Office. Photo 491 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A61 White joint compound On newer wall above lay-in ceiling tiles in Director’s Office. Photo 492 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A62 White wall texture with paint South wall in Main Office. Photo 482 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A63 Paper insulation from fire door. (Republic hollow metal 1-1/2 hour rated fire door) At door from Main Office into the Back Office. Photo 493 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A64 Tan mastic and off-white mastic to brown cove base Behind door in Manager’s Office. Photo 494 None Detected Both Layers KHS-LC-0412- A65 White joint compound Behind light switch plate in Middle Storage Room. Photo 495 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A66 White ceramic wall tile grout In Middle Storage Room by door. Photo 496 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A67 Acoustical ceiling tile. ACT-1: Tan 12”x12” with directionally aligned fissures to 11/2”, 1/16 & 1/8” even distribution of holes In Middle Storage Room by door. Photo 497 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A68 Gray ceramic wall tile mortar In Middle Storage Room by door. Photo 496 0.75% Chrysotile KHS-LC-0412- A69 Tan mastic to abandoned duct from roof and fiberglass insulation Near center of the Middle Storage Room above cement plaster ceiling. Photo 507 None Detected Both Layers KHS-LC-0412- A70 Gray cement plaster Near center of the Middle Storage Room above ceiling. Photo 506 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A71 White, heavy orange peel wall texture South wall, North Side Storage Room. Photo 513 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A72 White, heavy orange peel wall texture East wall, North Side Storage Room. Photo 516 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A73 White splotchy wall texture North wall of Middle Storage Room. Photo 514 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A74 White, heavy orange peel wall texture South wall, North Side Storage Room. Photo 517 None Detected AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 44 of 219 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT Division 02 Section 02 26 00 KIB Administration Building Section 02 26 00 Mechanical Upgrades Page 16 of 29 SAMPLE NUMBER MATERIAL LOCATION ASBESTOS CONTENT KHS-LC-0412- A75 White splotchy wall texture North wall of Middle Storage Room. Photo 515 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A76 Gray cement plaster West end of North Side Storage Room above ceiling. Photo 522 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A77 White joint compound On metal corner strip in Main Office near entryway. Photo 523 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A78 White joint compound Center of west wall in Arctic Entry. Photo 525 1.8% Chrysotile KHS-LC-0412- A79 White joint compound Center of wall in north alcove of Arctic Entry. Photo 527 2.1% Chrysotile KHS-LC-0412- A80 White joint compound On corner strip near Break Room sink. Photo 531 2.4% Chrysotile KHS-LC-0412- A81 White splotchy wall texture On corner strip near Break Room sink. Photo 530 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A82 Fabric wall panel backing North end of west wall in Main Office. Photo 537 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A83 Tan fabric wall panel backing South end of west wall in Main Office. Photo 535 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A84 Off-white fiberglass insulation wrap with metal foil In Boiler Room. Photo 561 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A85 Exterior, dark gray sealant to CMU and concrete sill Exterior at window of Back Office. Photo 564 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A86 Exterior, brown sealant and clear sealant to window frame and plywood infill panel Exterior at window of Back Office. Photo 563 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A87 Black and clear sealants to CMU and metal plate (analyzed as one layer) Exterior south wall. Photo MKS423 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A88 Black and clear sealants to CMU and window frame (clear sealant not analyzed) Exterior south end of west wall. Photo MKS424 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A89 Black sealant to CMU and window frame North exterior covered entry on exterior window. Photo MKS425 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A90 Brown sealant to window frame and window casing North exterior covered entry on exterior window. Photo MKS426 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A91 Thermal System Insulation – Hard fitting (Gray insulation with white wrap) Crawlspace on 2” copper pipe. Photo 571 Ins. – 1.5% Chrysotile Wrap – None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A92 Green mastic to blue board insulation and concrete foundation South foundation wall in crawl space. Photo 576 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A93 Green mastic to blue board insulation and concrete foundation South foundation wall in crawl space. Photo 588 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A94 Fiberglass pipe insulation and wrap with metal foil and black mastic at pipe hangar South side of crawl space. Photo 586 None Detected All Layers KHS-LC-0412- A95 Tan fiberglass pipe insulation cloth wrap On ¾” copper pipe in south side of crawlspace. Photo 577 None Detected AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 45 of 219 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT Division 02 Section 02 26 00 KIB Administration Building Section 02 26 00 Mechanical Upgrades Page 17 of 29 SAMPLE NUMBER MATERIAL LOCATION ASBESTOS CONTENT KHS-LC-0412- A96 Tan fiberglass pipe insulation and cloth wrap On 2” copper pipe in south side of crawlspace. Photo 578 None Detected Both Layers KHS-LC-0412- A97 Green mastic to blue board insulation and concrete foundation Southwest foundation wall in crawl space. Photo 579 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A98 Brown penetration putty-like sealant Hole filler in floor above. South end of crawlspace. Photo 589 6.7% Chrysotile KHS-LC-0412- A99 Thermal System Insulation – Hard fitting On ½” copper pipe southeast corner of crawlspace. Photo 590 1.4% Chrysotile KHS-LC-0412- A100 Green mastic to blue board insulation and concrete foundation East foundation wall in crawl space. Photo 579 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A101 Tan fiberglass pipe insulation lagging On end of ¾” pipe east end of crawl space. Photo 627 None Detected KHS-LC-0412- A102 Tan duct pin mastic North side of crawlspace. Photo 641 4.5% Chrysotile KHS-LC-0412- A103 Tan duct pin mastic North side of crawlspace. Photo 637 4.4% Chrysotile The testing method used (polarized light microscopy [PLM]) is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in floor coverings and similar non-friable organically bound materials. Before this material can be considered or treated as non-asbestos containing, confirmation should be made by quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The following materials in the have been found to contain asbestos in this or previous surveys or were assumed to contain asbestos. KIB Administration Building 1. Joint compound in gypsum wallboard systems on the ceilings and walls. 2. Cement asbestos board (CAB) “Glasweld” insulated infill panels at exterior windows. 3. Cement asbestos board (CAB) “Glasweld” exterior roof soffit panels. 4. Sheet vinyl flooring and mastics. 5. Carpeting mastics (assumed ACM). 6. Black mastic of original 9”x9” Floor tile (confirmed asbestos). 7. Original 9”x9” Floor tile (confirmed asbestos). 8. Cove base and mastic (assumed ACM). 9. Gaskets at piping, boiler, DMT generator, Heat Exchangers, etc. confirmed and assumed asbestos Hard and chalky insulation at end caps of larger pipe valves, fittings and elbows. 10. Hard and chalky insulation at rain leaders (assumed ACM if present). 11. Boiler gaskets and stack insulation. 12. Tan duct pin mastics on air ducting in fan room (confirmed ACM). 13. Incandescent light fixture heat shields (assumed ACM). 14. High temperature wiring insulation at fluorescent lights (confirmed ACM in the former Learning Center built at the same time as the Admin Building and may be present connecting the older fluorescent fixtures and at “pigtails” of incandescent fixtures). 15. Gray ceramic tile mortar (Found to contain up to 0.75% chrysotile in the demolished portion of the former Learning Center and noted to be present in restrooms of the Admin Bldg., assumed ACM). 16. Exterior tarry damp-proofing (assumed ACM). 17. Vermiculite insulation inside Concrete Masonry Units (assumed to be present). 18. Window glazing (assumed ACM). Learning Center 1. Joint compound in gypsum board ceilings and wall systems (confirmed ACM). 2. Floor tile and associated mastics (confirmed ACM). AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 46 of 219 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT Division 02 Section 02 26 00 KIB Administration Building Section 02 26 00 Mechanical Upgrades Page 18 of 29 3. High temperature wiring insulation at fluorescent lights (confirmed ACM in portion of building that was demolished and may be present connecting the older fluorescent fixtures and at “pigtails” of incandescent fixtures). 4. Hard and chalky insulation pipe valves and fittings (confirmed ACM). 5. Tan duct pin mastics on air ducting insulation in boiler room (confirmed ACM). 6. Brown putty at penetration sealants (confirmed ACM). 7. Boiler gaskets and sealants (assumed ACM). 8. Flange gaskets and valve packing on mechanical equipment and piping (assumed ACM). 9. Exterior tarry damp-proofing (assumed ACM). 10. Gray ceramic tile mortar (Found to contain up to 0.75% chrysotile, assumed ACM) 11. Vermiculite insulation inside Concrete Masonry Units (CMU). 12. Cement asbestos board (CAB) “Glasweld” insulated infill panels at exterior window west of whop entrance. 13. Cement asbestos board (CAB) “Glasweld” exterior roof soffit panels (assumed hidden by metal panels). 14. Window glazing (assumed ACM). The effects of the above asbestos-containing materials on the proposed renovation are discussed below. KIB Administration Building Floor Tile and Mastic 9”x9” Vinyl floor tiles and flooring mastic throughout the project area were previously reported to contain asbestos. Carpet covers the majority of the original 9”x9” VAT but in some areas it is exposed like in the original built-in shelving, closets, and cabinets between the offices. The floor tiles and mastics were mostly in good condition with a few localized areas of damage. The tile and mastic are not friable, and is unlikely to be disturbed by this project. Sheet Vinyl Flooring Some of the toilet rooms and janitor closets in the building were asbestos containing. The sheet vinyl floorings were in several colors, and are not presently friable, but are unlikely to be disturbed by this project. Joint Compound Joint compound on gypsum board walls, soffits and ceilings throughout the project buildings were previously reported to contain asbestos based on sampling reported by others in the AHERA Management Plan. Joint compound was in good condition and is not considered friable unless damaged. The joint compound will be partially removed by this project. Wall Texturing Compound Various wall textures were noted but not sampled. The texture ranged from a heavy wall texture noted in the storage closet in room 108 and 109 to a light orange in some of the offices but it was not sampled. The texturing was in good condition and is not currently friable due to being coated with paint. The texturing will typically become friable during disturbance or removal and is considered Class 1 asbestos work. The texturing is unlikely to be disturbed by this project. Pipe Fitting Insulation Piping in the crawlspace, fan room, and boiler room is insulated at fittings with asbestos-containing insulation – some had been abated, however. The insulation is generally in good condition, but some were noted to have physical damage or damage from leaks at the fitting. The piping and the asbestos-containing insulation will be partially removed by this project. The dirt floors in the crawl space was contaminated by debris from the asbestos-containing pipe insulation, and due to periodic ground water infiltration. It is recommended that at least 2 inches of the contaminated rocky soil be removed to provide a safer environment for the pipe replacement portion of this project. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 47 of 219 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT Division 02 Section 02 26 00 KIB Administration Building Section 02 26 00 Mechanical Upgrades Page 19 of 29 Door Insulation Original hallway doors were assumed to be insulated with asbestos-containing insulation. The doors are unlikely to be disturbed by this project. Roofing Roofing is PVC and matched the roof noted on the former Learning Center which does not contain asbestos. However patching tars, debris from the original built-up roofing, as well as possible asbestos-containing vapor barrier or mastics may still exist beneath the newer roof on the roof deck and on flashing and other equipment penetrating the roof deck. The roofing materials will be partially removed by this project. Cement Asbestos Board The soffit beneath the overhang of the roof is covered with cement asbestos board. The board is in good condition and is not friable. The cement asbestos board materials are unlikely to be disturbed by this project. Cement Asbestos Window Wall Panels Cement asbestos panel are present in most all window walls throughout the project building. These panels are made of two cement asbestos panel with insulation sandwich in between panels. Panels are present above and below windows. Panels are also present on the ceilings of some exterior entrance canopies. The cement asbestos panels are in good condition and are not friable in their present condition and are unlikely to be disturbed by this project. Sink Undercoating Stainless steel sinks throughout the project buildings were coated on the underside with a black, white, or pink spray-applied material assumed to be ACM. This material was in good condition and is not considered friable. The sinks are unlikely to be disturbed by this project. Door, Window and Penetration Sealants and Window Glazing Compounds The sealants at penetrations through the outer walls are assumed to be asbestos-containing. The window glazing compounds are assumed to contain asbestos. The sealants are assumed to be not friable and in good condition. The sealants and glazing compounds are unlikely to be disturbed by this project. Exterior Foundation Wall Damp-proofing Sealant The foundation water-proofing is assumed to contain asbestos. The sealants are assumed to be not friable and in good condition. Efflorescence was noted on the interior side of the foundation which may because there is no foundation water-proofing or that it has deteriorated. The tarry sealants will be partially removed by this project. Vermiculite Insulation Vermiculite is assumed to be present inside the CMU cells, and in accordance with EPA Guidance, is assumed to contain more than 1 percent asbestos. The vermiculite is friable, and is classified as RACM. The vermiculite is unlikely to be disturbed by this project. Duct Pin Mastics Mastics used to secure insulation holding pins to metal ductwork contained asbestos. The mastic was in good condition and was not friable and will be partially removed by this project. Light Fixture Heat Shields Several incandescent light fixtures were identified that were may be shielded with an asbestos-containing heat shield. Although not tested, it is assumed that wiring associated with these fixtures was insulated with asbestos-containing insulation. This shield material was in good condition and is considered friable. Wiring insulation is not friable and are unlikely to be disturbed by this project. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 48 of 219 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT Division 02 Section 02 26 00 KIB Administration Building Section 02 26 00 Mechanical Upgrades Page 20 of 29 High Temperature Wiring Insulation High temperature wiring insulation at fluorescent lights (confirmed ACM in the former Learning Center built at the same time as the Admin Building) may be present connecting the older fluorescent fixtures and at “pigtails” of incandescent fixtures is assumed have asbestos-containing insulation. Wiring insulation is typically not friable and are unlikely to be disturbed by this project. Window Glazing Compound Windows throughout the project building are assumed to contain an asbestos-containing glazing compound. This material was visible around the glass of operable windows. An asbestos-containing sealant is assumed to be present behind molding on fixed window panes. The sealants and glazing compounds are unlikely to be disturbed by this project. Penetration Sealants Doors, windows and other penetrations of the exterior walls are assumed to contain an asbestos-containing sealant compound. An asbestos-containing sealant is assumed to be present around exterior door frames. The sealants are will be partially removed by this project. Boiler Gaskets and Sealants Gaskets and sealants on the boilers contained asbestos. These materials are difficult to sample without disassembly of equipment and consequently limited sampling was performed. These materials were in good condition but may become friable during removal for replacement. Some used gaskets appeared to have been recently removed from boiler #2 and one tested positive for asbestos. The gaskets and sealants will be partially removed by this project. Flange Gaskets and Valve Packing Representative sampling of gaskets and valve packing on mechanical equipment in the boiler room and in the fan room indicate a mixture of both asbestos-containing and non-asbestos containing flange gaskets and valve packings. These materials are difficult to sample without disassembly of equipment and consequently limited sampling was performed. These materials were in good condition but may become friable during removal for replacement. The gaskets and packings will be partially removed by this project. Ceramic Tile Grout The gray ceramic tile mortar of the yellow 4”x4” wall tiles in the former Learning Center was found to contain chrysotile in the demolished portion of the former Learning Center and was present in restrooms of the Admin Bldg. The materials are in good condition and is not friable. The grout is unlikely to be disturbed by this project. Learning Center Gypsum Board Joint Compound Gypsum board joint compound in the former Learning Center now used as a shop for the KIB was asbestos- containing. No asbestos has been detected in the gypsum board. Joint compound was in good condition in all areas except for room 110 where water intrusion is occurring when it rains. The joint compound is likely to be disturbed during this project. Wall Texturing Compound Texturing on the shop storage room walls was noted but not sampled and is assumed to contain asbestos. It appears to be a newer light orange peel. The texturing was in good condition and is not currently friable due to being coated with paint. The texturing is unlikely to be disturbed by this project. Floor Tile and Mastic Vinyl floor tiles and flooring mastic throughout the project area contain asbestos. The floor tiles and mastics were mostly in good condition with a few localized areas of damage such as in room 110 where previous water damage had displaced floor tiles which have been subsequently damaged by foot traffic. The tile and mastic are not friable and will be disturbed during the roof leak repair. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 49 of 219 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT Division 02 Section 02 26 00 KIB Administration Building Section 02 26 00 Mechanical Upgrades Page 21 of 29 Wire Insulation Wire insulation sampled from fluorescent light fixtures contained asbestos in the portion of the building that was demolished in 2012-2013 as part of another project. This insulation was used in the wires connecting end-to-end fixtures but was not found in the building wiring. The wire insulation was in good condition and is not friable. The wiring with asbestos-containing insulation will not be removed by this project. High Temperature Wiring Insulation High Temperature Wiring Insulation is assumed to have asbestos-containing insulation. The wiring may be present on the older incandescent light fixtures in areas like the janitor’s storage room, room 120, and the restrooms. Wiring insulation is typically not friable and are unlikely to be disturbed by this project. Pipe Fitting Insulation Piping in the crawl space is insulated at fittings/elbows with asbestos-containing insulation. Insulation on piping and rain leaders concealed within the attic space may also be present. The insulation is generally in good condition, but some debris was noted for example in the crawlspace in the area below the sink in room 110. We did not note any ACM pipe fitting insulation in the boiler room as it appeared that is was previously removed and replaced with fiberglass insulation, but some may be present in out of sight locations. The insulation is considered friable. The straight runs of pipe insulation were fiberglass in the crawlspace. The dirt floor of the crawl space is contaminated by debris from the asbestos-containing pipe insulation, and due to periodic ground water infiltration. If piping in the crawlspace will be replaced during the boiler replacement project, it is recommended that at least 2 inches of the contaminated rocky soil be removed to provide a safer environment for the pipe replacement portion of this project. Duct Pin Mastics Mastics used to secure insulation holding pins to metal ductwork in the boiler room contained asbestos. We noted the same duct pin mastic on the ducting in the storage area behind the (former) freezer above and to the left of the blue exit door. There was also some that was previously identified on ducting in the crawlspace in the portion of the building that was demolished but there was no ducting in the crawlspace of the remaining portion of the building. The mastic was in good condition and was not friable and will be removed by this project. Brown Penetration Putty/Sealant A brown putty-like penetration sealant was used to patch a hole going through a hole in the floor to the crawl space in the portion of the building previously demolished and we assume there may be some in similar penetrations in the remaining portion. The putty was in good condition, was not friable and is unlikely to be disturbed by this project. Boiler Gaskets and Sealants Boiler gaskets and sealants on both boilers are asbestos-containing. These materials are difficult to sample without disassembly of equipment, but limited sampling was performed on piping and associated unions, valves and fittings that are likely to be disassembled if the boilers are replaced. Some of the joints have signs that they are leaking so even if the boiler replacement does not occur, it is likely that these gaskets will be disturbed to make repairs. Flange Gaskets and Valve Packing Representative sampling of gaskets and valve packing on mechanical equipment in the boiler room indicated a mixture of asbestos-containing and non-asbestos-containing flange gaskets and valve packing. The reddish flange gaskets were none detect for asbestos but the black and off-white were positive for asbestos. All gaskets and valve packings should be assumed to contain asbestos. These materials were in generally in good condition, but some had visible signs of deterioration. The gaskets and valve packings may become friable during removal for replacement. The gaskets and packings will be partially removed if the boilers are replaced. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 50 of 219 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT Division 02 Section 02 26 00 KIB Administration Building Section 02 26 00 Mechanical Upgrades Page 22 of 29 Exterior Foundation Wall Damp-proofing Sealant The foundation water-proofing is assumed to be present but there are signs and symptoms that ground water intrusion is occurring through the foundation as efflorescence water noted on the foundation wall in the crawlspace indicating lack of or now foundation damp-proofing was present. If it is present it is not friable. The tarry sealants may be disturbed by this project. Gray Tile Mortar Gray wall tile mortar was found to contain up to 0.75% asbestos in samples taken in the now demolished portion of the former Learning Center. The same beige or yellow wall tiles are present in the remaining portion of the former Learning Center now used as a shop. Although not technically an ACM, they should be treated as an ACBM. This material was in good condition and may be disturbed if the boiler replacement project. Cement Asbestos Board Infill Panels The insulated infill panels above and below the windows was found to contain asbestos. This material was in good condition and is unlikely to be disturbed by this project. 2. Asbestos in Dusts The settled and concealed dusts were examined by an EPA Certified Building Inspector but no samples for asbestos in dusts were authorized for this project. Based on their visual inspection and experience from similar buildings, the inspector determined that the typical settled and concealed dusts are not “asbestos debris” from an asbestos-containing building material (ACBM). Based on similar sampling from similar buildings, the inspector also determined that the dusts are unlikely to contain more than one percent (1%) asbestos by weight, and therefore are not an asbestos-containing material (ACM). 3. Lead-Containing Materials Lead-Testing EHS-Alaska tested paint and other materials throughout the affected areas of the building using a Heuresis XRF lead paint analyzer. Previous lead testing in 2012 in the building used a NITON XRF lead paint analyzer. Lead in paints tested varied from a trace amount to 3.44 mg/cm2. Lead in other materials tested varied from a trace amount to 27.35 mg/cm2. Refer to the Lead Paint Screening Table in Appendix C that identifies the surfaces tested, and the results. The Paint Test Locations are shown in the Drawings in Appendix D. Paints There were varying lead contents found in the paints, based on what surfaces they are on, with most surfaces containing little lead (but are still classified as lead-containing materials by OSHA). The highest levels of lead were painted metal doors, and on the generator support framing, with lower levels on walls and other painted surfaces, and lowest levels on pre-finished materials. Lead based paints (paint containing more than 1.0 mg/cm2 of lead) were identified in the project on steel components such as the generator and generator support and doors. It is anticipated that other metal door frames may be painted with lead-based paint. Lead was detected at very low levels in most of the painted floor, wall and ceiling surfaces. XRF testing is not able to “prove” that “no” lead exists in the paint. Low levels of lead found by XRF testing does not mean that the paints are free of lead, the paints may contain lead. However, these paints may not present a hazard to occupants or workers performing renovation or demolition if lead-safe work practices are followed. Ceramic Wall Tile and Glazing Relatively high concentrations of lead were found in the glazing of ceramic wall tiles in the former Learning Center as well as glazing of the ceramic sink in room 110. The glazing of decorative wall tile found on walls in restrooms and halls, and the restroom sinks, toilets, etc. contained high lead levels. The concentrations of lead in ceramic glazing compounds should not be compared to lead-based paint criteria, as the glazing AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 51 of 219 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT Division 02 Section 02 26 00 KIB Administration Building Section 02 26 00 Mechanical Upgrades Page 23 of 29 is inherently less likely to cause lead to be present in dusts or on surfaces, where it can be ingested. Lead in ceramic tile glazing may not pose a hazard to occupants, or workers performing renovation or demolition if lead-safe work practices are followed. All ceramic tiles and fixtures in the facility should be assumed to contain lead. Metallic Lead in Batteries, Pipe Solder and Flashing Metallic lead items identified in the building included lead soldering at the sheet metal roof flashings, lead solder at copper piping, and poured lead sealants at bell and spigot joints of waste and vent piping and lead acid batteries in emergency lights and other battery backup equipment. If removed during renovation or demolition they should be recycled or disposed of as hazardous waste. Lead Dusts The settled and concealed dusts were examined but no samples for lead in dusts were authorized for this project. Based on their visual inspection and similar sampling from similar buildings, the inspector also determined that the dusts are likely to have measurable concentrations of lead in the dusts. 4. PCB-Containing Materials Light Ballasts Older fluorescent lights typically have PCB-containing ballasts. PCB-containing ballasts in fluorescent lights were banned in 1978, but manufacturers were allowed to use up existing stocks, and lights may have been reused from other facilities. The survey included examination of what were considered to be representative light fixtures, but not all fixtures were able to be accessed. All lights shall be inspected during removal or relocation. Unless ballasts were marked “No PCBs,” they must be assumed to contain PCBs and must be disposed of as a hazardous waste when removed for disposal. Fluorescent light fixtures that did not contain a label with “No PCBs” were found stored in the crawlspace in the Administration Building through the access hatch in the boiler room but several marked “No PCBs” were also noted in the same area. Fluorescent light fixtures with PCB-containing ballasts are assumed to be present in the Administration Building. The light fixtures in the former Learning Center appeared to have been replaced since 2012 and had electronic ballast but there may be some areas where the older fixtures are still present. Fluorescent light fixtures that were not marked “No PCBs” were found in the building, but due to the age of the building, may not actually contain PCB’s. It is recommended that the manufacturer of the ballasts be contacted to determine if the ballasts actually contain PCB’s. The fluorescent light fixtures are unlikely to be disturbed by this project. Older HID lights may have PCB-containing ballasts. Due to height restrictions and sealed ballast enclosures, the HID fixtures were not able to be accessed. All HID lights shall be inspected during removal or relocation. If ballasts are not marked “No PCBs,” we suggest contacting the manufacturer of the lights to determine if the ballasts contain PCB’s, or assume that they contain PCB’s and be disposed of as a hazardous waste. The HID light fixtures are unlikely to be disturbed by this project. Bulk Products Some older paints, sealants and other building materials may contain measurable amounts of PCB’s. PCB use in paints and sealants was supposed to have been discontinued in 1979. The EPA does not require the sampling of bulk products, and no sampling of “Bulk Products” were authorized for this project. 5. Mercury-Containing Materials Fluorescent Lamps Fluorescent lamps use mercury to excite the phosphor crystals that coat the inside of the lamp. These lamps contain from 15 to 48 milligrams of mercury depending on their age and manufacturer. The fluorescent light fixtures are unlikely to be disturbed by this project. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 52 of 219 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT Division 02 Section 02 26 00 KIB Administration Building Section 02 26 00 Mechanical Upgrades Page 24 of 29 Thermostats Older thermostats or other electrical switches that may contain mercury were not noted in the building. High Intensity Discharge Lamps High Intensity Discharge (HID) lamps use mercury and sodium vapors in the lamp, and also typically have lead-containing solders at the bases. These lamps contain varying amounts of mercury depending on their age and manufacturer. The HID light fixtures are unlikely to be disturbed by this project. All mercury-containing items being removed by this project are required to be disposed of as hazardous waste or recycled. 6. Other Hazardous Materials Self-Illuminating Exit Signs Several radioactive, self-illuminating exit signs and smoke detectors were found in the renovation area. No radioactive exit signs are scheduled to be replaced by this project. If any radioactive items are removed by this project, they are required be disposed of as hazardous waste or recycled. Household Chemicals Common household chemicals, including quantities of construction repair materials, paint products, paint thinners, caustics, cleaners, pesticides, disinfectants, glycols (antifreeze), floor or furniture wax, furniture or paint strippers, solvents, fuel, new or used lubrication products, wood preservatives, resins, adhesives were present in the building. These loose containers were present in the shop and janitor’s closets, and several offices and will be relocated by the owner. Soil Contamination The scope of work for EHS-Alaska, Inc. did not include investigation of soils for petroleum or other contaminations. Refrigerants Refrigerators were identified in the building that may contain ozone depleting refrigerants. Air conditioning units may also be present. Ozone depleting substances (ODS) are regulated by the EPA and must be removed by certified technicians prior to equipment disposal. Glycol The existing heating system is assumed to contain heating system glycol. Any glycol removed from the heating system shall be recovered and properly disposed of or recycled. E. REGULATORY CONSTRAINTS 1. Asbestos-Containing Materials The Federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (29 CFR 1926.1101) and the State of Alaska Department of Labor (8 AAC 61) have promulgated regulations requiring testing for airborne asbestos fibers; setting allowable exposure limits for workers potentially exposed to airborne asbestos fibers; establishing contamination controls, work practices, and medical surveillance; and setting worker certification and protection requirements. These regulations apply to all workplace activities involving asbestos-containing materials. The EPA regulations, issued as Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 61 (40 CFR 61) under the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) established procedures for handling ACM during asbestos removal and waste disposal. These regulations required an owner (or the owner’s contractor) to notify the EPA of asbestos removal operations and to establish responsibility for the removal, transportation, and disposal of asbestos. It is recommended that clearance sampling which complies with AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 53 of 219 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT Division 02 Section 02 26 00 KIB Administration Building Section 02 26 00 Mechanical Upgrades Page 25 of 29 the EPA’s Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) protocol be required following removal of asbestos-containing materials to document that the asbestos has been properly removed. The disposal of asbestos waste is regulated by the EPA, the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, and the disposal site operator. Wastes being transported to the disposal site must be sealed in leak tight containers prior to disposal and must be accompanied by disposal permits and waste manifests. 2. Dusts with Asbestos Settled and concealed dusts above ceilings, and at other areas that are not routinely cleaned (such as inside ducts and at roofs, etc.) are assumed to have measurable concentrations of asbestos. Based on sampling of similar settled and concealed dusts at similar buildings, those dusts are assumed to contain less than 1 percent asbestos. Normal settled and concealed dusts are distinct and treated differently from debris resulting from damaged asbestos-containing materials. Background levels of asbestos in dusts for a particular location will depend on many factors, including whether or not asbestos occurs naturally in soils in the area. Likely sources of asbestos in dusts include natural occurrences of asbestos The types of asbestos found in settled and concealed dusts often contain actinolite, anthophylite, and tremolite forms of asbestos which are not commonly found in bulk samples taken of materials from buildings. Those forms of asbestos may come from natural occurrences of asbestos in an outside source, such as rock or ore deposits, which appear to be common in the Kodiak area. Because the type of disturbance, concentration of asbestos in the dusts, cohesiveness of the dusts and room sizes will change, the airborne asbestos levels expected during the project will depend on the contractor’s means and methods of conducting the work. The mere presence of asbestos in the dusts does not necessarily imply that a “hazard” exists which would require the use of specially trained workers to “abate” the “hazard”. All dusts will likely be required to be removed from the areas where asbestos- containing materials are being removed (abatement areas) in order to achieve clearances. The dusts in the other areas are to be controlled so as to limit worker exposures and prevent contamination of occupied areas of the building. There is no established correlation between settled or adhered dusts with measurable concentrations of asbestos and airborne concentrations. The definition in the OSHA regulations of asbestos-containing materials as those materials that contain 1 percent or more asbestos by weight, apply to cohesive materials and not to dusts. The OSHA regulations are essentially “performance based”, if workers are exposed above the permissible exposure limits, then all of the requirements in the regulations become effective. 3. Lead-Containing Materials The EPA Standard 40 CFR 745, Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention in Certain Residential Structures, defines lead–based paint hazards and regulates lead based paint activities in target housing and child- occupied facilities. The requirements of this regulation include training certification, pre-work notifications, work practice standards and record keeping. Areas typically classified as child occupied facilities may include but are not limited to: day care facilities, preschools, kindergarten classrooms, restrooms, multipurpose rooms, cafeterias, gyms, libraries and other areas routinely used by children under 6 years of age. New training requirements for Firms (Contractors) and Renovators (Workers) became effective on April 22, 2010. The building is not classified as a child occupied facility, therefore the requirements of 40 CFR 745 do not apply. The requirements apply to renovation, repair or painting activities when at least six square feet of lead- based paint is disturbed in a room or more than 20 square feet of lead-based paint is disturbed on the exterior. It is anticipated that only small amounts of lead based paint (if present) will be required to be AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 54 of 219 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT Division 02 Section 02 26 00 KIB Administration Building Section 02 26 00 Mechanical Upgrades Page 26 of 29 disturbed for this renovation work, and the work would be classified as minor repair and maintenance activities, therefore most requirements of 40 CFR 745 do not apply. Federal OSHA (29 CFR 1926.62) and the State of Alaska (8 AAC Chapter 61) have promulgated regulations that apply to all construction work where employees may be exposed to lead. The disturbance of any surfaces painted with lead-containing paint requires lead-trained personnel, personnel protective procedures, and air monitoring until exposure levels can be determined. If initial monitoring verifies that the work practices being used are not exposing workers, monitoring and protection procedures may be relaxed. Experience has shown that some paints in most buildings will contain low concentrations of lead and disturbance of those paints are still regulated under the OSHA lead standard, 29 CFR 1926.62. Low levels of lead found by XRF testing does not mean that the paints are free of lead, the paints may contain lead, and OSHA regulations apply anytime measurable amounts of lead are present in paints. Settled and concealed dust above ceilings, and at other areas that are not routinely cleaned are assumed to have measurable concentrations of lead. Background levels of lead in dusts for a particular location will depend on many factors, including whether or not engines utilizing leaded gasoline were run in or near a building, and upon the age of the building, and thus the age of the dusts. Because the type of disturbance, quantity of lead dusts, cohesiveness of the dusts and room sizes will change, the airborne lead levels expected during the project will depend on the contractor’s means and methods of conducting the work. The mere presence of lead in the dusts does not necessarily imply that a “hazard” exists which would require the use of specially trained workers to “abate” the “hazard”. There is no established correlation between settled or adhered lead dust concentrations and airborne concentrations. The OSHA regulations are essentially “performance based”, if workers are exposed above the permissible exposure limits, then all of the requirements in the regulations become effective. The EPA requires that actual construction or demolition debris that contains lead or lead-containing paint or other heavy metals be tested using the TCLP test to determine if the waste must be treated as hazardous waste. All federal, state and local standards regulating lead and lead-containing wastes are required to be followed during the renovation or demolition of portions of this building. If the TCLP tests done on the waste stream(s) that are produced by the contractor are found to be classified as hazardous wastes, then those waste stream(s) will have to be packaged for shipping and disposal in accordance with hazardous waste and transportation regulations. Because there are no hazardous waste landfills in Alaska, this report assumes that disposal will take place in Seattle or elsewhere in the Pacific Northwest. 4. PCB-Containing Materials The EPA has promulgated regulations (40 CFR Part 761) that cover the proper handling and disposal of PCB-containing materials. PCB-containing equipment was found by this survey, and any removed PCB- containing equipment is required to be disposed of at fully permitted hazardous waste facilities. If any PCB- containing equipment is discovered and if they will be removed, those materials are required to be disposed of at fully permitted hazardous waste facilities. The EPA regulates liquid PCBs differently from non-liquid materials. Workers who remove or handle PCB-containing or PCB-contaminated materials or who transport or dispose of PCB wastes must be trained and certified in hazardous waste operations and emergency response (HAZWOPER) as required by 29 CFR 1910.120 and the State of Alaska Department of Labor (8 AAC 61). The Department of Transportation under 49 CFR Parts 100-199 regulates the marking, packaging, handling and transportation of hazardous materials. All federal, state and local standards regulating PCBs and PCB waste must be followed during this project. 5. Mercury-Containing Materials Thermostats and mercury-containing lamps are classified by the EPA as Universal Wastes. The EPA encourages that all Universal Wastes be recycled in accordance with 40 CFR 273. Mercury and mercury- AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 55 of 219 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT Division 02 Section 02 26 00 KIB Administration Building Section 02 26 00 Mechanical Upgrades Page 27 of 29 containing products are considered hazardous waste if TCLP testing of the waste for mercury confirms the mercury content to be greater than the EPA criteria of 0.2 mg/l. 6. Other Hazardous Materials Refrigerants Refrigerators were present in the kitchen area that are scheduled to remain. Typically, refrigeration systems with ODS shall be maintained in order to prevent discharge of ODS. Systems that are to be removed, or dismantled shall have refrigerants containing ODS recovered and disposed of or recycled in accordance with 40 CFR 82. Chemical Hazards The EPA has promulgated regulations (40 CFR Parts 260 to 299 amongst others) that cover the proper handling and disposal of waste chemicals, including listed wastes, which are ignitable, corrosive, reactive, toxic, or an acute hazardous waste or wastes that exhibit the characteristics of toxicity. All construction workers who are required to remove or handle chemical hazards or to transport or dispose of chemical wastes shall be trained and certified as required by the U.S. Department of Labor (29 CFR 1910.120) and the State of Alaska Department of Labor (8 AAC 61). Transportation of chemical hazards are regulated by Department of Transportation regulations under 49 CFR Parts 171 to 178 amongst others. Waste heat transfer fluids (such as used heating/cooling system glycol or other circulating heating/cooling fluids) are a potentially hazardous waste and are required to be TCLP tested prior to disposal to determine if the fluids are classified as hazardous or non-hazardous waste per the EPA’s RCRA regulations governing hazardous wastes. According to a study performed by the University of Northern Iowa, standard TCLP analysis using ICP SW 6010 testing procedures commonly report levels of Arsenic and Selenium over regulatory thresholds due to interferences in the matrix. That report concluded that additional analysis should be performed to refute the presence of Arsenic or Selenium over the regulatory levels by either mass spectrometry using method SW 6020, or by graphite furnace using method SW 7060. Some heat transfer fluids may also contain potentially hazardous additives that modify the properties of the fluids for use in a particular system. It is recommended that the contractor consult with the persons responsible for maintaining the system to determine if any additives that may be potentially hazardous were used in the system to further determine disposal requirements. Radioactive Materials Self-luminous products that contain Tritium, Krypton-85, or Promethium-147 are considered radioactive. There are special disposal requirements for products that contain Tritium, Krypton-85, or Promethium-147 that are generally licensed. Data from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) indicates that most all Tritium powered exit signs are generally licensed and therefore must be disposed of at a licensed disposal facility or returned to the manufacturer/distributor for disposal. Licensed radioactive products are regulated by Nuclear Regulatory Commission standard 10 CFR 20 and 10 CFR 32. Smoke detectors were present in the project area that may contain a radioactive material. If the detectors are of the ionization type they typically contain a small amount of Americium. If removed during renovation, the detectors should be returned to the owner for reuse or returned to the manufacturer for disposal or recycling. There are no licensed disposal facilities for radioactive wastes in Alaska. F. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Asbestos-Containing Materials The asbestos-containing materials identified in the building are typically in intact condition and are classified as both friable and non-friable ACM. All asbestos-containing materials that will be disturbed by the planned renovation work are required to be removed by trained asbestos workers. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 56 of 219 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT Division 02 Section 02 26 00 KIB Administration Building Section 02 26 00 Mechanical Upgrades Page 28 of 29 2. Dusts with Asbestos Dusts with measurable concentrations of asbestos are assumed to be present, but are not classified as asbestos-containing materials, or as debris from asbestos-containing materials. Workers disturbing dusts are required to have hazard communication training in accordance with OSHA regulations, but are not required to receive 40 hours of training, which is required for asbestos workers. The contractor will need to choose means and methods to control worker exposures to airborne contaminants. At least an initial exposure assessment or data from previous air monitoring is needed to show that worker exposures are maintained below the OSHA permissible exposure limits (PELs). 3. Lead-Containing Materials Federal OSHA (29 CFR 1926.62) and the State of Alaska (8 AAC Chapter 61) have promulgated regulations that apply to all construction work where employees may be exposed to lead, including disturbance of paints with low concentrations of lead. Worker exposure to lead may be able to be controlled below the OSHA permissible exposure limit if proper engineering controls and procedures are used during renovation. Lead is a potentially hazardous waste and the EPA requires that all wastes that contains lead be tested to determine if they must be treated as hazardous waste. A TCLP test of the waste stream(s) produced by the Contractor’s means and methods are required to be performed to determine if those wastes will be hazardous or non-hazardous 4. PCB-Containing Materials PCB-containing ballasts scheduled for removal or replacement will need to be removed, handled, packaged and disposed of in accordance with all regulations. If any PCB-containing ballasts are discovered, and they are removed or replaced, they will need to be removed, handled, packaged and disposed of in accordance with all regulations. 5. Mercury-Containing Materials Mercury-containing materials scheduled for removal or replacement will need to be removed, handled, packaged and disposed of in accordance with all regulations. If any mercury-containing materials are removed or replaced, they will need to be removed, handled, packaged and disposed of in accordance with all regulations. If mercury-containing lamps and thermostats are handled and disposed of in accordance with the Universal Waste Regulations, no TCLP test is required. If the Contractor chooses to perform a TCLP test of fluorescent lamps, the test shall be conducted in accordance with the requirements of ANSI/NEMA Standard Procedure for Fluorescent Lamp Sample Preparation and Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure, C78.LL 1256-2003 or latest version. 6. Other Hazardous Materials Radioactive materials scheduled for removal or replacement will need to be removed, handled, packaged and disposed of in accordance with all regulations. If any radioactive materials are removed or replaced, they will need to be removed, handled, packaged and disposed of in accordance with all regulations. Refrigeration units with ODS scheduled for removal will need to be removed, handled, packaged and disposed of in accordance with all regulations. The common household chemicals shall be properly disposed of in accordance with all regulations and the requirements of the disposal site. These chemicals may alternatively be utilized or recycled by the contractor. Heat transfer fluids will need to be removed, handled, packaged and disposed of in accordance with all regulations. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 57 of 219 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT Division 02 Section 02 26 00 KIB Administration Building Section 02 26 00 Mechanical Upgrades Page 29 of 29 G. LIMITATIONS The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based upon professional opinions with regard to the subject matter. These opinions have been arrived at in accordance with currently accepted environmental consulting and engineering standards and practices and are subject to the following inherent limitations: 1. Accuracy of Information The laboratory reports utilized in this assessment were provided by the accredited laboratories cited in this report. Although the conclusions, opinions, and recommendations are based in part, on such information, our services did not include the verification of accuracy or authenticity of such reports. Should such information provided be found to be inaccurate or unreliable, EHS-Alaska, Inc. reserves the right to amend or revise its conclusions, opinions, and/or recommendations. 2. Site Conditions This limited survey did not include investigation of the entire site and may not be valid outside the survey area. The intent of this survey was to identify common hazardous materials that may be disturbed during routine maintenance or renovations. This survey is not intended to be utilized as the sole design document for abatement. This survey was conducted while the site was occupied. All inspections were performed with furniture, equipment and/or stored items in place. The scope of work for this survey did not include identification of all potentially hazardous materials that may be present at this site, and was limited to the scope of work agreed upon with our client. Although a concerted effort was made to identify those common hazardous materials likely to be affected by this project, some hazardous materials may have been hidden by furniture, equipment or stored items and may not have been identified. The survey investigated representative materials and items, such as lights and mechanical components. Variations may occur between materials and items that appear to be the same, but are actually of different construction or materials. Other asbestos-containing or potentially hazardous materials may be present in the facilities that were concealed by structural members, walls, ceilings or floor coverings, or in materials where testing was not conducted. 3. Changing Regulatory Constraints The regulations concerning hazardous materials are constantly changing, including the interpretations of the regulations by the local and national regulating agencies. Should the regulations or their interpretation be changed from our current understanding, EHS-Alaska, Inc. reserves the right to amend or revise its conclusions, opinions, and/or recommendations. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 58 of 219 APPENDIX A Asbestos Bulk Sample Field Survey Data Sheets and Laboratory Reports AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 59 of 219 Lab No.: 6996027 Client No.: KLC0320-A25 Analyst Observation: Brown Mastic Client Description: Brown, Brittle, Cove Base Mastic Location: Former Learning Center: Room 110 Photo 1703 Facility: Percent Asbestos: None Detected Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: None Detected Percent Non-Fibrous Material: 100 Lab No.: 6996027(L2) Client No.: KLC0320-A25 Analyst Observation: Off-White Joint Compound Client Description: Brown, Brittle, Cove Base Mastic Location: Former Learning Center: Room 110 Photo 1703 Facility: Percent Asbestos: PC 1.8 Chrysotile Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: None Detected Percent Non-Fibrous Material: 98.2 Lab No.: 6996028 Client No.: KLC0320-A26 Analyst Observation: Brown Cove Base Client Description: Brown Cove Base (CB-1) 4" Brittle Location: Former Learning Center: Room 110 Photo 1704 Facility: Percent Asbestos: None Detected Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: None Detected Percent Non-Fibrous Material: 100 Lab No.: 6996029 Client No.: KLC0320-A27 Analyst Observation: Grey Gasket Client Description: Fibrous Gasket Location: Former Learning Center Boiler Room Photo 1626 Facility: Percent Asbestos: 80 Chrysotile Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: None Detected Percent Non-Fibrous Material: 20 Lab No.: 6996030 Client No.: KLC0320-A28 Analyst Observation: Beige Gasket Client Description: Fibrous Woven Rope Gasket Location: Former Learning Center Boiler Room Photo 1629 Facility: Percent Asbestos: None Detected Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: 90 Fibrous Glass Percent Non-Fibrous Material: 10 Lab No.: 6996031 Client No.: KLC0320-A29 Analyst Observation: Off-White Gasket Client Description: Flange Gasket- Off White Location: Former Learning Center Boiler Room Photo 1630 Facility: Percent Asbestos: 40 Chrysotile Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: None Detected Percent Non-Fibrous Material: 60 Laboratory Director Approved By: Date Analyzed: 3/25/2020Date Received: Analyst: Please refer to the Appendix of this report for further information regarding your analysis. Signature: Michael Moore 03/26/2020 Frank E. Ehrenfeld, III 9000 Commerce Parkway Suite B Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054 Telephone: 856-231-9449 Email: customerservice@iatl.com CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Client:EHS Alaska Incorporated 11901 Business Blvd., Ste 208 Eagle River AK 99577 3/26/2020Report Date: Report No.:612198 - PLM Project:Kodiak KIB Mechanical Upgrades Project No.:7765-02 PLM BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS SUMMARY Client:EHS511 Dated : 4/1/2020 1:37:08 Page 1 of 7 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 60 of 219 Lab No.: 6996032 Client No.: KLC0320-A30 Analyst Observation: Black/White Gasket Client Description: Flat Hard Black Gasket Location: Former Learning Center Boiler Room Photo 1633 Facility: Percent Asbestos: 60 Chrysotile Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: None Detected Percent Non-Fibrous Material: 40 Lab No.: 6996033 Client No.: KLC0320-A31 Analyst Observation: Red/Brown Glazing Client Description: Reddish-Brown Location: Former Learning Center Boiler Room Photo 1635 Facility: Percent Asbestos: None Detected Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: 15 Talc Percent Non-Fibrous Material: 85 Lab No.: 6996034 Client No.: KLC0320-A32 Analyst Observation: Yellow Sealant Client Description: Hard, Brittle Pipe Thread Sealant Location: Former Learning Center Boiler Room Photo 1638 Facility: Percent Asbestos: None Detected Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: None Detected Percent Non-Fibrous Material: 100 Lab No.: 6996035 Client No.: KLC0320-A33 Analyst Observation: Black Sealant Client Description: Hard, Brittle Pipe Thread Sealant Location: Former Learning Center Boiler Room Photo 1645 Facility: Percent Asbestos: None Detected Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: None Detected Percent Non-Fibrous Material: 100 Lab No.: 6996036 Client No.: KLC0320-A34 Analyst Observation: Lt Grey Sealant Client Description: Duct Pin Mastic- Yellowish Location: Former Learning Center Boiler Room Photo 1658 Facility: Percent Asbestos: PC 3.5 Chrysotile Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: None Detected Percent Non-Fibrous Material: 96.5 Lab No.: 6996037 Client No.: KLC0320-A35 Analyst Observation: Yellow Mastic Client Description: Duct Pin Mastic- Yellowish Location: Former Learning Center Boiler Room Photo 1659 Facility: Percent Asbestos: PC 3.1 Chrysotile Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: None Detected Percent Non-Fibrous Material: 96.9 Laboratory Director Approved By: Date Analyzed: 3/25/2020Date Received: Analyst: Please refer to the Appendix of this report for further information regarding your analysis. Signature: Michael Moore 03/26/2020 Frank E. Ehrenfeld, III 9000 Commerce Parkway Suite B Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054 Telephone: 856-231-9449 Email: customerservice@iatl.com CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Client:EHS Alaska Incorporated 11901 Business Blvd., Ste 208 Eagle River AK 99577 3/26/2020Report Date: Report No.:612198 - PLM Project:Kodiak KIB Mechanical Upgrades Project No.:7765-02 PLM BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS SUMMARY Client:EHS511 Dated : 4/1/2020 1:37:08 Page 2 of 7 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 61 of 219 Lab No.: 6996038 Client No.: KLC0320-A36 Analyst Observation: Off-White Joint Compound Client Description: White Joint Compound Location: Former Learning Center Boiler Room Photo 1669 Facility: Percent Asbestos: PC 1.8 Chrysotile Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: None Detected Percent Non-Fibrous Material: 98.2 Lab No.: 6996039 Client No.: KLC0320-A37 Analyst Observation: Red Gasket Client Description: Reddish Flange Gasket- Hard Brittle Location: Former Learning Center Boiler Room Photo 1670 Facility: Percent Asbestos: None Detected Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: None Detected Percent Non-Fibrous Material: 100 Lab No.: 6996040 Client No.: KLC0320-A38 Analyst Observation: Black Gasket Client Description: Black Flange Gasket- 1/8" Thick-Rubbery Location: Former Learning Center Boiler Room Photo 1671 Facility: Percent Asbestos: None Detected Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: None Detected Percent Non-Fibrous Material: 100 Lab No.: 6996041 Client No.: KLC0320-A39 Analyst Observation: Red Gasket Client Description: Reddish Flange Gasket- Hard Brittle Location: Former Learning Center Boiler Room Photo 1678 Facility: Percent Asbestos: None Detected Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: None Detected Percent Non-Fibrous Material: 100 Lab No.: 6996042 Client No.: KLC0320-A40 Analyst Observation: Black Gasket Client Description: Black Flange Gasket- 1/8"- Hard Location: Former Learning Center Boiler Room Photo 1683 Facility: Percent Asbestos: 60 Chrysotile Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: None Detected Percent Non-Fibrous Material: 40 Lab No.: 6996043 Client No.: KLC0320-A41 Analyst Observation: Off-White Gasket Client Description: Off-White Gasket With Red Paint Location: Former Learning Center Boiler Room Photo 1692 Facility: Percent Asbestos: 60 Chrysotile Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: None Detected Percent Non-Fibrous Material: 40 Laboratory Director Approved By: Date Analyzed: 3/25/2020Date Received: Analyst: Please refer to the Appendix of this report for further information regarding your analysis. Signature: Michael Moore 03/26/2020 Frank E. Ehrenfeld, III 9000 Commerce Parkway Suite B Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054 Telephone: 856-231-9449 Email: customerservice@iatl.com CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Client:EHS Alaska Incorporated 11901 Business Blvd., Ste 208 Eagle River AK 99577 3/26/2020Report Date: Report No.:612198 - PLM Project:Kodiak KIB Mechanical Upgrades Project No.:7765-02 PLM BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS SUMMARY Client:EHS511 Dated : 4/1/2020 1:37:08 Page 3 of 7 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 62 of 219 Lab No.: 6996044 Client No.: KLC0320-A42 Analyst Observation: Tan Ceiling Tile Client Description: 12x12 Glue-On Ceiling Tiles w/Aligned Fissures, Med. Density Of 1/16 And 1/8 Inch Holes, Brn Hard, B Location: Former Learning Center Room 110 Photo 1697 Facility: Percent Asbestos: None Detected Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: 80 Cellulose Percent Non-Fibrous Material: 20 Lab No.: 6996044(L2) Client No.: KLC0320-A42 Analyst Observation: Brown Mastic Client Description: 12x12 Glue-On Ceiling Tiles w/Aligned Fissures, Med. Density Of 1/16 And 1/8 Inch Holes, Brn Hard, B Location: Former Learning Center Room 110 Photo 1697 Facility: Percent Asbestos: None Detected Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: 10 Talc Percent Non-Fibrous Material: 90 Lab No.: 6996045 Client No.: KLC0320-A43 Analyst Observation: White Joint Compound Client Description: White Joint Compound And GWB Location: Former Learning Center Room 110 Photo 1700 Facility: Percent Asbestos: None Detected Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: 3 Cellulose Percent Non-Fibrous Material: 97 Lab No.: 6996046 Client No.: KLC0320-A44 Analyst Observation: White Joint Compound Client Description: White Joint Compound Location: Former Learning Center Room 110 Photo 1702 Facility: Percent Asbestos: None Detected Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material: None Detected Percent Non-Fibrous Material: 100 Laboratory Director Approved By: Date Analyzed: 3/25/2020Date Received: Analyst: Please refer to the Appendix of this report for further information regarding your analysis. Signature: Michael Moore 03/26/2020 Frank E. Ehrenfeld, III 9000 Commerce Parkway Suite B Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054 Telephone: 856-231-9449 Email: customerservice@iatl.com CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Client:EHS Alaska Incorporated 11901 Business Blvd., Ste 208 Eagle River AK 99577 3/26/2020Report Date: Report No.:612198 - PLM Project:Kodiak KIB Mechanical Upgrades Project No.:7765-02 PLM BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS SUMMARY Client:EHS511 Dated : 4/1/2020 1:37:08 Page 4 of 7 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 63 of 219 Appendix to Analytical ReportCustomer Contact: Ellen Cloudy Method:40 CFR Appendix E to Subpart E of Part 763, interim method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples, and USEPA 600, R93-116 as needed. This appendix seeks to promote greater understanding of any observations, exceptions, special instructions, or circumstances that the laboratory needs to communicate to the client concerning the above samples. The information below is used to help promote your ability to make the most informed decisions for you and your customers. Please note the following points of contact for any questions you may have. iATL Customer Service: customerservice@iatl.com iATL Office Manager:wchampion@iatl.com iATL Account Representative : Semih Kocahasan Sample Login Notes: See Batch Sheet Attached Sample Matrix: Bulk Building Materials Exceptions Noted: See Following Pages General Terms, Warrants, Limits, Qualifiers: General information about iATL capabilities and client/laboratory relationships and responsibilities are spelled out in iATL policies that are listed at www.iATL.com and in our Quality Assurance Manual per ISO 17025 standard requirements. The information therein is a representation of iATL definitions and policies for turnaround times, sample submittal, collection media, blank definitions, quantification issues and limit of detection, analytical methods and procedures, sub-contracting policies, results reporting options, fees, terms, and discounts, confidentiality, sample archival and disposal, and data interpretation. iATL warrants the test results to be of a precision normal for the type and methodology employed for each sample submitted. iATL disclaims any other warrants, expressed or implied, including warranty of fitness for a particular purpose and warranty of merchantability. iATL accepts no legal responsibility for the purpose for which the client uses test results. Any analytical work performed must be governed by our Standard Terms and Conditions. Prices, methods and detection limits may be changed without notification. Please contact your Customer Service Representative for the most current information. This confidential report relates only to those item(s) tested and does not represent an endorsement by NIST-NVLAP, AIHA LAP LLC, or any agency of local, state or province governments nor of any agency of the U.S. government. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. Information Pertinent to this Report: Analysis by US EPA 600 93-116: Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM). Certifications: NIST-NVLAP No. 101165-0• NYSDOH-ELAP No. 11021• AIHA-LAP, LLC No. 100188• Quantification at <0.25% by volume is possible with this method. (PC) Indicates Stratified Point Count Method performed. (PC-Trace) means that asbestos was detected but is not quantifiable under the Point Counting regimen. PC Trace represents a <0.25% amount. Analysis includes all distinct separable layers in accordance with EPA 600 Method. If not reported or otherwise noted, layer is either not present or the client has specifically requested that it not be analyzed (ex. analyze until positive instructions). Small asbestos fibers may be missed by PLM due to resolution limitations of the optical microscope. Therefore, PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound (NOB) materials. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Analytical Methodology Alternatives: Your initial request for analysis may not have accounted for recent advances in regulatory requirements or advances in technology that are routinely used in similar situations for other qualified projects. You may have the option to explore additional analysis for further information. Below are a few options, listed as the matrix followed by the appropriate methodology. Also included are links to more information on our website. Bulk Building Materials that are Non-Friable Organically Bound (NOB) by Gravimetric Reduction techniques employing PLM and TEM: ELAP 198.6 (PLM-NOB), ELAP 198.4 (TEM-NOB) 9000 Commerce Parkway Suite B Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054 Telephone: 856-231-9449 Email: customerservice@iatl.com CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Client:EHS Alaska Incorporated 11901 Business Blvd., Ste 208 Eagle River AK 99577 3/26/2020Report Date: Report No.:612198 - PLM Project:Kodiak KIB Mechanical Upgrades Project No.:7765-02Client:EHS511 Page 5 of 7Dated : 4/1/2020 1:37:08 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 64 of 219 Loose Fill Vermiculite Insulation, Attic Insulation, Zonolite (copyright), etc.: US EPA 600 R-4/004 (multi-tiered analytical process) Sprayed On Insulation/Fireproofing with Vermiculite (SOF-V): ELAP 198.8 (PLM-SOF-V) Soil, sludge, sediment, aggregate, and like materials analyzed for asbestos or other elongated mineral particles (ex. erionite, etc.): ASTM D7521, CARB 435, and other options available Asbestos in Surface Dust according to one of ASTM's Methods (very dependent on sampling collection technique – by TEM): ASTM D 5755, D5756, or D6480 Various other asbestos matrices (air, water, etc.) and analytical methods are available. Disclaimers / Qualifiers: There may be some samples in this project that have a "NOTE:" associated with a sample result. We use added disclaimers or qualifiers to inform the client about something that requires further explanation. Here is a list with highlighted disclaimers that may be pertinent to this project. For a full explanation of these and other disclaimers, please inquire at customerservice@iatl.com . 1) Note: No mastic provided for analysis. 2) Note: Insufficient mastic provided for analysis. 3) Note: Insufficient material provided for analysis. 4) Note: Insufficient sample provided for QC reanalysis. 5) Note: Different material than indicated on Sample Log / Description. 6) Note: Sample not submitted. 7) Note: Attached to asbestos containing material. 8) Note: Received wet. 9) Note: Possible surface contamination. 10) Note: Not building material. 1% threshold may not apply. 11) Note: Recommend TEM-NOB analysis as per EPA recommendations. 12) Note: Asbestos detected but not quantifiable. 13) Note: Multiple identical samples submitted, only one analyzed. 14) Note: Analyzed by EPA 600/R-93/116. Point Counting detection limit at 0.080%. 15) Note: Analyzed by EPA 600/R-93/116. Point Counting detection limit at 0.125%. 16) Note: This sample contains >10% vermiculite mineral. See Appendix for Recommendations for Vermiculite Analysis. Recommendations for Vermiculite Analysis: Several analytical protocols exist for the analysis of asbestos in vermiculite. These analytical approaches vary depending upon the nature of the vermiculite mineral being tested (e.g. un-processed gange, homogeneous exfoliated books of mica, or mixed mineral composites).Please contact your client representative for pricing and turnaround time options available. iATL recommends initial testing using the EPA 600/R-93/116 method. This method is specifically designed for the analysis of asbestos in bulk building materials. It provides an acceptable starting point for primary screening of vermiculite for possible asbestos. Results from this testing may be inconclusive. EPA suggests proceeding to a multi-tiered analysis involving wet separation techniques in conjunction with PLM and TEM gravimetric analysis (EPA 600/R-04/004). For New York State customers, NYSDOH requires disclaimers and qualifiers for various vermiculite containing samples that direct analysis via ELAP198.6 and ELAP198.8 for samples that contain >10% vermiculite mineral where ELAP198.6 may be used to evaluate the asbestos content of the material. However, any test result using ELAP198.6 will be reported with the following disclaimer: “ELAP198.6 method does not remove vermiculite and may underestimate the level of asbestos present in a sample containing >10% vermiculite.” Further information on this method and other vermiculite and asbestos issues can be found at the following: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) www.atsdr.cdc.gov, United States Geological Survey (USGS) www.minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/, US EPA www.epa.gov/asbestos. The USEPA also has an informative brochure "Current Best Practices for Vermiculite Attic Insulation" EPA 747F03001 May 2003, that may assist the health and remediation professional. The following is a summary of the analytical process outlines in the EPA 600/R-04/004 Method: 1)Analytical Step/Method: Initial Screening by PLM, EPA 600R-93/116 Requirements/Comments: Minimum of 0.1 g of sample. ~0.25% LOQ for most samples. 2)Analytical Step/Method:Wet Separation by PLM Gravimetric Technique, EPA R-04/004 Requirements/Comments: Minimum 50g** of dry sample. Analysis of "Sinks" only. 9000 Commerce Parkway Suite B Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054 Telephone: 856-231-9449 Email: customerservice@iatl.com CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Client:EHS Alaska Incorporated 11901 Business Blvd., Ste 208 Eagle River AK 99577 3/26/2020Report Date: Report No.:612198 - PLM Project:Kodiak KIB Mechanical Upgrades Project No.:7765-02Client:EHS511 Page 6 of 7Dated : 4/1/2020 1:37:08 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 65 of 219 3)Analytical Step/Method:Wet Separation by PLM Gravimetric Technique, EPA R-04/004 Requirements/Comments: Minimum 50g** of dry sample. Analysis of "Floats" only. 4)Analytical Step/Method:Wet Separation by TEM Gravimetric Technique, EPA R-04/004 Requirements/Comments: Minimum 50g** of dry sample. Analysis of "Sinks" only. 5)Analytical Step/Method:Wet Separation by TEM Gravimetric Technique, EPA R-04/004 Requirements/Comments: Minimum 50g** of dry sample. Analysis of "Suspension" only. LOQ, Limit of Quantitation estimates for mass and volume analyses. *With advance notice and confirmation by the laboratory. **Approximately 1 Liter of sample in double-bagged container (~9x6 inch bag of sample). 9000 Commerce Parkway Suite B Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054 Telephone: 856-231-9449 Email: customerservice@iatl.com CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Client:EHS Alaska Incorporated 11901 Business Blvd., Ste 208 Eagle River AK 99577 3/26/2020Report Date: Report No.:612198 - PLM Project:Kodiak KIB Mechanical Upgrades Project No.:7765-02Client:EHS511 Page 7 of 7Dated : 4/1/2020 1:37:08 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 66 of 219 AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 67 of 219 AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 68 of 219 APPENDIX B Lead Analyzer Test Results AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 69 of 219 LEAD PAINT SCREENING SUMMARY Heuresis Pb200i, Serial No. 1770 LBP mg/cm2 +/- ERROR 1 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG SCHWAN -CALIBRATION ---20.19 3/17/20 11:49:01 POSITIVE 0.99 0.07 2 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG SCHWAN -CALIBRATION ---20.21 3/17/20 11:51:32 POSITIVE 1.04 0.07 3 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG SCHWAN -CALIBRATION ---20.36 3/17/20 11:54:15 POSITIVE 1.05 0.07 4 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG SCHWAN BOILER ROOM DOOR METAL FAIR BLUE 2.78 3/17/20 11:59:51 POSITIVE 2.58 0.18 5 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG SCHWAN BOILER ROOM DOOR FRAME METAL FAIR BLUE 2.45 3/17/20 12:00:29 POSITIVE 1.72 0.19 6 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG SCHWAN BOILER ROOM WALL CMU FAIR RED 3.16 3/17/20 12:01:31 NEGATIVE 0.16 0.17 7 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG SCHWAN BOILER ROOM WALL CMU FAIR WHITE 2.55 3/17/20 12:02:57 NEGATIVE 0.17 0.19 8 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG SCHWAN BOILER ROOM WALL CMU FAIR WHITE 3.75 3/17/20 12:03:28 NEGATIVE 0.02 0.15 9 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG SCHWAN BOILER ROOM TANK METAL FAIR RED 2.4 3/17/20 12:05:17 NEGATIVE 0.22 0.19 10 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG SCHWAN BOILER ROOM COMPRESSOR METAL FAIR GREEN 2.67 3/17/20 12:07:32 NEGATIVE 0.23 0.18 11 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG SCHWAN BOILER ROOM COMPRESSOR METAL FAIR BLACK 2.38 3/17/20 12:08:15 NEGATIVE 0.26 0.19 12 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG SCHWAN BOILER ROOM BOILER METAL FAIR GRAY 2.57 3/17/20 12:09:54 NEGATIVE 0.22 0.19 13 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG SCHWAN BOILER ROOM BOILER METAL FAIR GRAY 2.34 3/17/20 12:10:20 NEGATIVE 0.21 0.2 14 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG SCHWAN BOILER ROOM BOILER METAL FAIR GRAY 2.42 3/17/20 12:10:49 NEGATIVE 0.13 0.19 15 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG SCHWAN BOILER ROOM BOILER METAL FAIR GRAY 2.38 3/17/20 12:11:22 NEGATIVE 0.16 0.19 16 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG SCHWAN BOILER ROOM BOILER METAL FAIR GRAY 2.38 3/17/20 12:12:56 NEGATIVE 0.21 0.19 17 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG SCHWAN BOILER ROOM FLOOR CONCRETE FAIR GRAY 2.32 3/17/20 12:14:07 NEGATIVE 0.2 0.2 18 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG SCHWAN BOILER ROOM WALL CONCRETE FAIR WHITE 2.35 3/17/20 12:15:10 NEGATIVE 0.12 0.19 19 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG SCHWAN BOILER ROOM GENERATOR METAL FAIR ORANGE 2.48 3/17/20 12:18:06 POSITIVE 1.12 0.19 20 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG SCHWAN BOILER ROOM GENERATOR METAL FAIR ORANGE 2.33 3/17/20 12:18:31 POSITIVE 1.7 0.2 21 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG SCHWAN BOILER ROOM GENERATOR METAL FAIR ORANGE 2.29 3/17/20 12:18:58 POSITIVE 1.8 0.2 22 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG SCHWAN BOILER ROOM SUPPORT METAL FAIR ORANGE 2.28 3/17/20 12:21:34 POSITIVE 1.81 0.2 23 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG SCHWAN BOILER ROOM SUPPORT METAL FAIR RED 2.59 3/17/20 12:22:38 NEGATIVE 0.3 0.19 24 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG SCHWAN BOILER ROOM SUPPORT METAL FAIR RED 2.36 3/17/20 12:23:30 NEGATIVE 0.24 0.19 25 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG SCHWAN BOILER ROOM PUMP METAL FAIR BLACK 2.38 3/17/20 12:25:34 NEGATIVE 0.13 0.19 26 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG SCHWAN BOILER ROOM PIPE METAL FAIR BLACK 2.56 3/17/20 12:26:13 NEGATIVE 0.18 0.19 27 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG SCHWAN BOILER ROOM VALVE METAL FAIR RED 2.42 3/17/20 12:27:03 NEGATIVE -0.1 0.19 28 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG SCHWAN BOILER ROOM VALVE METAL FAIR RED 2.89 3/17/20 12:27:35 NEGATIVE -0.15 0.18 29 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG SCHWAN BOILER ROOM DUCT METAL FAIR WHITE 2.58 3/17/20 12:30:21 NEGATIVE 0.14 0.19 30 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG SCHWAN BOILER ROOM DUCT METAL FAIR WHITE 2.38 3/17/20 12:31:56 NEGATIVE 0.12 0.19 31 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG --CALIBRATION ---20.27 3/17/20 13:59:59 POSITIVE 1.01 0.07 32 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG --CALIBRATION ---20.27 3/17/20 14:02:32 POSITIVE 1.05 0.07 33 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG --CALIBRATION ---20.19 3/17/20 14:05:03 POSITIVE 1.03 0.07 34 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG --CALIBRATION ---20.14 3/18/20 13:11:28 POSITIVE 1.03 0.07 35 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG --CALIBRATION ---20.14 3/18/20 13:13:57 POSITIVE 1.06 0.07 36 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG --CALIBRATION ---20.2 3/18/20 13:16:24 POSITIVE 1.02 0.07 37 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG -FAN ROOM DUCT METAL WHITE 2.51 3/18/20 13:23:11 NEGATIVE 0.07 0.19 38 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG -FAN ROOM DUCT METAL WHITE 2.41 3/18/20 13:23:33 NEGATIVE 0.06 0.19 39 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG -FAN ROOM DOOR CASING METAL LT BROWN 2.33 3/18/20 13:25:37 NEGATIVE 0.65 0.2 40 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG -FAN ROOM WALL CMU WHITE 2.3 3/18/20 13:26:17 NEGATIVE 0.12 0.2 41 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG -FAN ROOM WALL CMU WHITE 2.93 3/18/20 13:26:55 NEGATIVE 0.11 0.17 42 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG -FAN ROOM PIPE METAL SILVER 2.52 3/18/20 13:29:06 POSITIVE 3.44 0.19 43 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG -FAN ROOM PUMP METAL RED 2.35 3/18/20 13:30:20 NEGATIVE 0.67 0.2 44 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG -FAN ROOM PUMP METAL BROWN 2.48 3/18/20 13:31:11 NEGATIVE 0.74 0.19 45 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG -FAN ROOM FLOOR CONCRETE GRAY 3.17 3/18/20 13:32:08 NEGATIVE 0.25 0.17 46 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG -FAN ROOM MECHANICAL EQUIP METAL GRAY 2.41 3/18/20 13:34:48 NEGATIVE 0.18 0.19 47 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG -FAN ROOM POST METAL SILVER 2.45 3/18/20 13:35:34 NEGATIVE 0.25 0.19 48 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG -FAN ROOM POST METAL SILVER 2.28 3/18/20 13:36:00 NEGATIVE 0.23 0.2 49 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG -FAN ROOM SUPPORT METAL GRAY 2.68 3/18/20 13:38:00 NEGATIVE 0.17 0.18 50 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG -FAN ROOM PUMP METAL RED 2.85 3/18/20 13:39:13 NEGATIVE 0.02 0.18 51 KIB - ADMINISTRATION BLDG -FAN ROOM PIPE METAL SILVER 2.42 3/18/20 13:39:55 POSITIVE 1.29 0.19 RESULTSNO.SITE INSPECTOR ROOM COMPONENT SUBSTRATE CONDITION COLOR DURATION TIME 7765-KIB Administration Building Mechanical Upgrades Kodiak, Alaska Page 1 of 2 AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 70 of 219 LEAD PAINT SCREENING SUMMARY LBP mg/cm2 +/- ERROR RESULTSNO.SITE INSPECTOR ROOM COMPONENT SUBSTRATE CONDITION COLOR DURATION TIME 52 KIB - Learning Center SCHWAN BOILER ROOM WALL CMU WHITE 2.24 3/18/20 13:44:38 NEGATIVE 0.13 0.2 53 KIB - Learning Center SCHWAN BOILER ROOM WALL CMU WHITE 2.28 3/18/20 13:45:02 NEGATIVE 0.17 0.2 54 KIB - Learning Center SCHWAN BOILER ROOM WALL CONCRETE WHITE 2.22 3/18/20 13:45:47 NEGATIVE 0.3 0.2 55 KIB - Learning Center SCHWAN BOILER ROOM BOILER METAL SILVER 2.56 3/18/20 13:47:21 NEGATIVE 0.33 0.19 56 KIB - Learning Center SCHWAN BOILER ROOM BOILER METAL SILVER 2.29 3/18/20 13:47:49 NEGATIVE 0.2 0.2 57 KIB - Learning Center SCHWAN BOILER ROOM WALL METAL BLUE 2.41 3/18/20 13:50:01 NEGATIVE 0.01 0.19 58 KIB - Learning Center SCHWAN BOILER ROOM DOOR FRAME METAL BLUE 2.27 3/18/20 13:50:33 POSITIVE 1.27 0.2 59 KIB - Learning Center SCHWAN BOILER ROOM ELECTRICAL PANEL METAL OFF-WHITE 2.57 3/18/20 13:51:39 NEGATIVE 0.69 0.19 60 KIB - Learning Center SCHWAN BOILER ROOM ELECTRICAL PANEL METAL OFF-WHITE 2.43 3/18/20 13:52:10 NEGATIVE 0.59 0.19 61 KIB - Learning Center SCHWAN BOILER ROOM ELECTRICAL PANEL METAL GRAY 2.36 3/18/20 13:52:49 NEGATIVE 0.31 0.19 62 KIB - Learning Center SCHWAN BOILER ROOM ELECTRICAL PANEL METAL BROWN 2.98 3/18/20 13:53:21 NEGATIVE 0.37 0.17 63 KIB - Learning Center SCHWAN BOILER ROOM WALL CMU RED 2.23 3/18/20 13:54:51 NEGATIVE 0.27 0.2 64 KIB - Learning Center SCHWAN BOILER ROOM PIPE METAL SILVER 2.59 3/18/20 13:56:17 NEGATIVE 0.2 0.19 65 KIB - Learning Center SCHWAN BOILER ROOM SUPPORT METAL BLACK 2.35 3/18/20 14:02:01 NEGATIVE 0.17 0.2 66 KIB - Learning Center SCHWAN BOILER ROOM SUPPORT METAL BLACK 2.33 3/18/20 14:02:45 NEGATIVE 0.23 0.2 67 KIB - Learning Center SCHWAN BOILER ROOM PUMP METAL RED 2.36 3/18/20 14:03:55 NEGATIVE 0.75 0.19 68 KIB - Learning Center SCHWAN BOILER ROOM PUMP METAL RED 2.42 3/18/20 14:04:29 NEGATIVE 0.66 0.19 69 KIB - Learning Center SCHWAN BOILER ROOM PUMP METAL RED 2.89 3/18/20 14:04:53 NEGATIVE 0 0.18 70 KIB - Learning Center SCHWAN BOILER ROOM PUMP METAL BROWN 2.41 3/18/20 14:06:12 NEGATIVE 0.02 0.19 71 KIB - Learning Center SCHWAN BOILER ROOM VALVE METAL RED 2.34 3/18/20 14:07:29 NEGATIVE 0.23 0.2 72 KIB - Learning Center SCHWAN BOILER ROOM VALVE METAL RED 2.3 3/18/20 14:07:50 NEGATIVE 0.21 0.2 73 KIB - Learning Center SCHWAN BOILER ROOM FLANGE METAL RED 2.37 3/18/20 14:08:42 NEGATIVE 0.04 0.19 74 KIB - Learning Center SCHWAN BOILER ROOM TANK METAL BROWN 2.64 3/18/20 14:10:19 NEGATIVE 0.91 0.18 75 KIB - Learning Center SCHWAN BOILER ROOM TANK METAL BROWN 2.47 3/18/20 14:10:46 POSITIVE 1.28 0.19 76 KIB - Learning Center SCHWAN 110 DOOR WOOD VARNISH 2.41 3/18/20 14:17:21 NEGATIVE -0.11 0.19 77 KIB - Learning Center SCHWAN 110 DOOR FRAME METAL OFF-WHITE 2.39 3/18/20 14:18:04 NEGATIVE 0.2 0.19 78 KIB - Learning Center SCHWAN 110 SINK CERAMIC OFF-WHITE 2.35 3/18/20 14:42:02 POSITIVE 27.35 0.2 79 KIB - Learning Center SCHWAN 110 WALL DRYWALL WHITE 2.53 3/18/20 14:42:48 NEGATIVE 0.3 0.19 80 KIB - Learning Center SCHWAN 110 WALL DRYWALL WHITE 2.39 3/18/20 14:43:10 NEGATIVE 0.45 0.19 81 KIB - Learning Center SCHWAN 110 WALL DRYWALL OFF-WHITE 2.69 3/18/20 14:43:40 NEGATIVE 0.39 0.18 82 KIB - Learning Center SCHWAN 110 WALL CMU WHITE 2.28 3/18/20 14:44:12 NEGATIVE 0.49 0.2 83 KIB - Learning Center SCHWAN HALL WALL CERAMIC YELLOW 2.43 3/18/20 14:47:48 POSITIVE 8.93 0.19 84 KIB - Learning Center SCHWAN HALL WALL CERAMIC YELLOW 2.23 3/18/20 14:48:10 POSITIVE 8.22 0.2 85 KIB - Learning Center SCHWAN HALL FLOOR CERAMIC BROWN 2.35 3/18/20 14:48:59 NEGATIVE 0.28 0.2 86 KIB - Learning Center SCHWAN -CALIBRATION 20.25 3/18/20 14:51:48 POSITIVE 1.05 0.07 87 KIB - Learning Center SCHWAN -CALIBRATION 20.18 3/18/20 14:54:12 POSITIVE 1.03 0.07 88 KIB - Learning Center SCHWAN -CALIBRATION 20.31 3/18/20 14:56:38 POSITIVE 1.02 0.07 Table Heading Descriptions: Duration: LBP: mg/cm2: VOID: This is the nominal time in "source" seconds that each sample was analyzed. Results are shown as positive (POS >1.0 mg/cm2) or negative (NEG < 1.0 mg/cm2). Positive results are shown in bold print. This is the testing results produced by the Heuresis Pb200i instrument in milligrams of lead per square centimeter (mg/cm2). The EPA defines lead based paint as paint containing lead at 1.0 mg/cm2 or greater. A negative number is a result of an internal computation made by the instrument and should be interpreted as zero. Even though paint may be termed negative (less than 1.0 mg/cm2) by EPA definition, disturbance of the paint may still be regulated by OSHA under 29 CFR 1926.62. Where lead is present at any level, appropriate engineering controls, work practices and personal protective equipment should be used until a negative exposure assessment can be determined. <LOD indicates that the lead present was less than the limits of detection of the instrument (very little or no lead present). This indicates that the test was intentionally terminated by the operator due to operator error (e.g. -operator moved analyzer while testing). Where ceramic is shown as a substrate, lead content is typically from the glazing on the tile unless the tile is painted. 7765-KIB Administration Building Mechanical Upgrades Kodiak, Alaska Page 2 of 2 AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 71 of 219 LEAD BASED PAINT SCREENING KODIAK HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION AND RENOVATION HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY REPORT 003126 - D1 Depth Index 1 LC Schwan --SHUTTER CAL ---160.93 4/25/2012 13:30 --3.24 0.00 2 LC Schwan --SHUTTER CAL ---162.82 4/25/2012 14:27 --3.08 0.00 3 LC Schwan VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID 4/25/2012 14:28 VOID VOID VOID VOID 4 LC Schwan VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID 4/25/2012 14:29 VOID VOID VOID VOID 5 LC Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --RED 21.12 4/25/2012 14:30 1.03 Positive 1.00 0.10 6 LC Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --RED 24.42 4/25/2012 14:32 1.02 Positive 1.00 0.10 7 LC Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --RED 21.08 4/25/2012 14:33 2.65 Positive 1.10 0.10 8 LC Schwan EXTERIOR FIRST EXT. WALL METAL INTACT RED 10.22 4/25/2012 14:39 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 9 LC Schwan EXTERIOR FIRST EXT. WALL METAL INTACT GRAY 10.26 4/25/2012 14:41 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 10 LC Schwan EXTERIOR FIRST DOOR TRIM METAL INTACT BROWN 7.98 4/25/2012 14:44 1.49 Negative 0.40 0.10 11 LC Schwan EXTERIOR FIRST EXT. DOOR METAL INTACT BROWN 1.84 4/25/2012 14:46 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 12 LC Schwan EXTERIOR FIRST EXT. DOOR METAL INTACT BROWN 11.47 4/25/2012 14:46 1.35 Negative 0.00 0.02 13 LC Schwan EXTERIOR FIRST EXT. WALL CONCRETE INTACT BROWN 10.19 4/25/2012 14:48 5.62 Negative 0.02 0.04 14 LC Schwan EXTERIOR FIRST EXT. WALL WOOD PEELING BROWN 10.23 4/25/2012 14:55 1.63 Negative 0.00 0.02 15 LC Schwan EXTERIOR FIRST EXT. WINDOW METAL INTACT BROWN 10.20 4/25/2012 14:57 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 16 LC Schwan EXTERIOR FIRST EXT. WALL METAL INTACT BROWN 10.20 4/25/2012 15:02 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 17 LC Schwan EXTERIOR FIRST COLUMN CONCRETE POOR BROWN 10.25 4/25/2012 15:05 2.16 Negative 0.00 0.02 18 LC Schwan EXTERIOR FIRST WINDOW TRIM METAL INTACT BLACK 10.43 4/25/2012 15:13 1.66 Negative 0.00 0.02 19 LC Schwan EXTERIOR FIRST EXT. DOOR METAL INTACT BROWN 4.90 4/25/2012 15:15 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 20 LC Schwan EXTERIOR FIRST EXT. DOOR METAL INTACT BROWN 10.23 4/25/2012 15:17 2.35 Negative 0.00 0.02 21 LC Schwan EXTERIOR FIRST EXT. DOOR METAL INTACT BROWN 10.21 4/25/2012 15:25 3.42 Positive 2.70 0.30 22 LC Schwan EXTERIOR FIRST DOOR TRIM METAL INTACT BROWN 10.25 4/25/2012 15:26 2.32 Positive 1.90 0.20 23 LC Schwan EXTERIOR FIRST WINDOW SILL METAL INTACT BROWN 10.23 4/25/2012 15:30 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 24 LC Schwan EXTERIOR FIRST WINDOW TRIM METAL INTACT BROWN 10.62 4/25/2012 15:31 2.42 Negative 0.02 0.50 25 LC Schwan EXTERIOR FIRST WINDOW CASING WOOD CRACKED BROWN 15.17 4/25/2012 15:35 1.11 Negative 0.00 0.02 26 LC Schwan EXTERIOR FIRST EXT. DOOR METAL INTACT BROWN 9.43 4/25/2012 15:38 1.60 Positive 1.70 0.20 27 LC Schwan EXTERIOR FIRST DOOR TRIM METAL INTACT BROWN 21.55 4/25/2012 15:40 1.99 Positive 1.00 0.10 28 LC Schwan VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID 0.82 4/25/2012 15:43 VOID VOID VOID VOID 29 LC Schwan EXTERIOR FIRST EXT. WALL CONCRETE INTACT BROWN 5.32 4/25/2012 15:43 1.62 Negative 0.01 0.02 30 LC Schwan EXTERIOR FIRST EXT. WALL CONCRETE INTACT BROWN 10.22 4/25/2012 15:49 6.73 Negative 0.04 0.07 31 LC Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --RED 22.89 4/25/2012 15:54 1.04 Positive 1.00 0.10 32 LC Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --RED 21.97 4/25/2012 15:55 1.04 Positive 1.00 0.10 33 LC Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --RED 19.44 4/25/2012 15:56 2.85 Positive 1.20 0.10 34 KHS Schwan --SHUTTER CAL ---161.01 4/26/2012 8:15 --2.83 0.00 35 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --RED 22.30 4/26/2012 8:19 1.07 Positive 1.10 0.10 36 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --RED 4.73 4/26/2012 8:20 1.15 Positive 1.20 0.10 37 KHS Schwan VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID 1.84 4/26/2012 8:20 VOID VOID VOID VOID 38 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --RED 9.19 4/26/2012 8:21 2.74 Positive 1.20 0.20 39 KHS Schwan PENT A ROOF HATCH PENT EXT. DOOR METAL PEELING RED 3.27 4/26/2012 10:07 3.28 Negative 0.02 0.08 40 KHS Schwan VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID 0.42 4/26/2012 10:07 VOID VOID VOID VOID 41 KHS Schwan PENT A ROOF HATCH PENT EXT. DOOR METAL PEELING RED 16.35 4/26/2012 10:08 1.00 Positive 1.80 0.40 42 KHS Schwan PENT A ROOF HATCH PENT EXT. DOOR METAL PEELING RED 7.14 4/26/2012 10:09 10.00 Negative 0.14 0.67 43 KHS Schwan --SHUTTER CAL ---160.90 4/26/2012 13:59 --2.72 0.00 44 KHS Schwan VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID 15.37 4/26/2012 14:02 VOID VOID VOID VOID 45 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --RED 31.48 4/26/2012 14:04 1.03 Positive 1.00 0.10 46 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --RED 23.71 4/26/2012 14:05 1.06 Positive 1.00 0.10 47 KHS Schwan VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID 13.47 4/26/2012 14:06 VOID VOID VOID VOID 48 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --RED 9.80 4/26/2012 14:07 2.81 Positive 1.20 0.20 49 KHS Schwan S EXT WALL UPPER EXT. WALL CONCRETE PEELING RED 11.23 4/26/2012 14:42 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 50 KHS Schwan S EXT WALL LOWER EXT. WALL CONCRETE PEELING BEIGE 10.82 4/26/2012 14:44 2.28 Negative 0.01 0.02 No.SITE INSPECTOR ROOM FLOOR COMPONENT SUBSTRATE CONDITION mg/cm2 Error +/-COLOR Duration Time Results AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 72 of 219 LEAD BASED PAINT SCREENING KODIAK HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION AND RENOVATION HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY REPORT 003126 - D2 Depth IndexNo.SITE INSPECTOR ROOM FLOOR COMPONENT SUBSTRATE CONDITION mg/cm2 Error +/-COLOR Duration Time Results 51 KHS Schwan S EXT WALL LOWER EXT. TRIM METAL PEELING WHITE 10.46 4/26/2012 14:46 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 52 KHS Schwan S EXT WALL WINDOW FRAME METAL INTACT BLACK 13.26 4/26/2012 14:49 4.17 Negative 0.01 0.02 53 KHS Schwan S EXT WALL EXT. WALL METAL INTACT WHITE 10.40 4/26/2012 14:58 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 54 KHS Schwan S EXT WALL W END EXT. WALL METAL INTACT WHITE 10.22 4/26/2012 15:08 1.00 Negative 0.01 0.02 55 KHS Schwan S EXT WALL W END EXT. WALL METAL INTACT RED 10.71 4/26/2012 15:11 1.00 Negative 0.01 0.02 56 KHS Schwan W SIDE S END EXT. DOOR METAL INTACT BLUE 10.23 4/26/2012 15:15 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 57 KHS Schwan W SIDE S END EXT. DOOR TRIM METAL INTACT BLUE 14.35 4/26/2012 15:16 1.00 Negative 0.01 0.02 58 KHS Schwan W SIDE S END MECH EQUIP METAL INTACT WHITE 9.39 4/26/2012 15:22 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 59 KHS Schwan W SIDE EXT. DOOR METAL PEELING BLUE 12.44 4/26/2012 15:29 3.40 Negative 0.01 0.02 60 KHS Schwan W SIDE EXT. DOOR METAL PEELING BLUE 10.24 4/26/2012 15:52 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 61 KHS Schwan W SIDE EXT. WALL CONCRETE PEELING BEIGE 10.60 4/26/2012 15:58 4.50 Negative 0.01 0.02 62 KHS Schwan W SIDE EXT. WALL METAL INTACT WHITE 1.85 4/26/2012 15:59 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 63 KHS Schwan W SIDE EXT. WALL CONCRETE INTACT WHITE 6.34 4/26/2012 16:02 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 64 KHS Schwan W SIDE EXT. DOOR METAL FAIR BLUE 4.30 4/26/2012 16:05 1.00 Negative 0.01 0.02 65 KHS Schwan EXTERIOR AREA F EXT. WALL CONCRETE FAIR WHITE 12.47 4/26/2012 16:08 2.64 Positive 2.70 0.60 66 KHS Schwan EXTERIOR AREA F EXT. WALL CONCRETE FAIR WHITE 17.58 4/26/2012 16:10 7.47 Positive 2.70 0.50 67 KHS Schwan EXTERIOR AREA F WINDOW TRIM METAL INTACT BLUE 4.50 4/26/2012 16:13 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 68 KHS Schwan EXTERIOR AREA F EXT. WALL CONCRETE INTACT WHITE 10.22 4/26/2012 16:18 2.80 Positive 3.20 0.60 69 KHS Schwan EXTERIOR AREA F EXT. WALL METAL INTACT WHITE 22.30 4/26/2012 16:23 1.00 Positive 1.50 0.30 70 KHS Schwan EXTERIOR AREA F EXT. WALL CONCRETE INTACT WHITE 12.89 4/26/2012 16:27 1.24 Negative 0.00 0.02 71 KHS Schwan EXTERIOR AREA F EXT. WALL CONCRETE INTACT WHITE 8.19 4/26/2012 16:28 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 72 KHS Schwan VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID 2.66 4/26/2012 16:28 VOID VOID VOID VOID 73 KHS Schwan EXTERIOR AREA F EXT. WALL CONCRETE INTACT WHITE 6.35 4/26/2012 16:29 2.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 74 KHS Schwan VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID 4.09 4/26/2012 16:30 VOID VOID VOID VOID 75 KHS Schwan EXTERIOR AREA F EXT. WALL CONCRETE INTACT WHITE 13.47 4/26/2012 16:31 1.00 Positive 1.70 0.50 76 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --RED 10.65 4/26/2012 16:35 1.10 Positive 1.10 0.10 77 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --RED 10.43 4/26/2012 16:35 1.12 Positive 1.10 0.10 78 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --RED 22.29 4/26/2012 16:37 2.57 Positive 1.10 0.10 79 KHS Schwan --SHUTTER CAL ---159.04 4/26/2012 16:42 --2.95 0.00 80 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --RED 21.01 4/26/2012 16:49 1.03 Positive 1.00 0.10 81 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --RED 21.02 4/26/2012 16:51 1.06 Positive 1.00 0.10 82 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --RED 20.88 4/26/2012 16:52 2.59 Positive 1.10 0.10 83 KHS Schwan EXTERIOR EXT. DOOR METAL FAIR BLUE 2.87 4/26/2012 17:04 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 84 KHS Schwan EXTERIOR EXT. DOOR METAL FAIR BLUE 4.31 4/26/2012 17:05 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 85 KHS Schwan EXTERIOR EXT. WALL METAL POOR BROWN 4.28 4/26/2012 17:07 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 86 KHS Schwan EXTERIOR BEAM METAL INTACT ORANGE 15.86 4/26/2012 17:13 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 87 KHS Schwan EXTERIOR EXT. WALL CONCRETE POOR WHITE 17.34 4/26/2012 17:20 1.00 Positive 1.50 0.50 88 KHS Schwan EXTERIOR EXT. WALL CONCRETE POOR WHITE 7.58 4/26/2012 17:25 1.81 Negative 0.00 0.02 89 KHS Schwan EXTERIOR EXT. WALL CONCRETE POOR WHITE 3.89 4/26/2012 17:40 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 90 KHS Schwan EXTERIOR EXT. WALL CONCRETE POOR WHITE 3.88 4/26/2012 17:41 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 91 KHS Schwan EXTERIOR EXT. DOOR METAL FAIR BLUE 4.68 4/26/2012 17:46 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 92 KHS Schwan EXTERIOR TRIM METAL POOR BROWN 6.34 4/26/2012 17:49 1.43 Negative 0.04 0.02 93 KHS Schwan EXTERIOR TRIM METAL POOR BROWN 13.31 4/26/2012 17:53 1.23 Negative 0.06 0.02 94 KHS Schwan EXTERIOR EXT. WALL CONCRETE POOR WHITE 7.78 4/26/2012 17:56 1.14 Negative 0.01 0.02 95 KHS Schwan EXTERIOR EXT. WALL METAL INTACT BEIGE 5.13 4/26/2012 17:58 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 96 KHS Schwan VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID 17.57 4/26/2012 18:33 VOID VOID VOID VOID 97 KHS Schwan VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID 17.80 4/26/2012 18:34 VOID VOID VOID VOID 98 KHS Schwan VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID 4.08 4/26/2012 18:35 VOID VOID VOID VOID 99 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --RED 20.20 4/26/2012 18:36 1.01 Positive 1.00 0.10 100 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --RED 20.23 4/26/2012 18:37 1.05 Positive 1.00 0.10 AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 73 of 219 LEAD BASED PAINT SCREENING KODIAK HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION AND RENOVATION HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY REPORT 003126 - D3 Depth IndexNo.SITE INSPECTOR ROOM FLOOR COMPONENT SUBSTRATE CONDITION mg/cm2 Error +/-COLOR Duration Time Results 101 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --RED 20.24 4/26/2012 18:39 2.59 Positive 1.10 0.10 102 LC Schwan --SHUTTER CAL ---162.96 4/27/2012 14:38 --2.58 0.00 103 LC Schwan -FIRST CALIBRATION CK --RED 10.41 4/27/2012 14:41 1.08 Positive 1.10 0.10 104 LC Schwan VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID 11.21 4/27/2012 14:41 VOID VOID VOID VOID 105 LC Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --RED 12.26 4/27/2012 14:42 1.07 Positive 1.10 0.10 106 LC Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --RED 8.78 4/27/2012 14:43 2.77 Positive 1.20 0.20 107 LC Schwan VESTIBULE 100 FIRST WALL CONCRETE INTACT WHITE 5.29 4/27/2012 14:55 1.72 Negative 0.01 0.02 108 LC Schwan MAIN OFFICE FIRST WALL DRYWALL INTACT GREEN 3.48 4/27/2012 15:02 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 109 LC Schwan MAIN OFFICE FIRST WALL DRYWALL INTACT RED 3.46 4/27/2012 15:03 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 110 LC Schwan MAIN OFFICE FIRST WALL DRYWALL INTACT ORANGE 5.49 4/27/2012 15:04 1.86 Negative 0.01 0.02 111 LC Schwan DIRECTOR OF FINANCE FIRST WALL DRYWALL INTACT BLUE 4.29 4/27/2012 15:09 3.14 Negative 0.01 0.03 112 LC Schwan DIRECTOR OF FINANCE FIRST WALL DRYWALL INTACT BLUE 4.70 4/27/2012 15:11 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 113 LC Schwan MAIN OFFICE FIRST WALL DRYWALL INTACT BROWN 4.09 4/27/2012 15:13 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 114 LC Schwan MAIN OFFICE FIRST WALL DRYWALL INTACT BEIGE 4.08 4/27/2012 15:16 1.59 Negative 0.00 0.02 115 LC Schwan VESTBULE 104 FIRST WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE 4.29 4/27/2012 15:19 2.02 Negative 0.01 0.02 116 LC Schwan VESTBULE 104 FIRST DOOR TRIM METAL INTACT BROWN 5.72 4/27/2012 15:21 1.57 Negative 0.03 0.02 117 LC Schwan RM 106 FIRST WALL CERAMIC INTACT BEIGE 5.11 4/27/2012 15:39 2.08 Positive 7.30 1.20 118 LC Schwan CASSEYS OFFICE FIRST WALL DRYWALL INTACT BLUE 4.29 4/27/2012 16:39 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 119 LC Schwan CASSEYS OFFICE FIRST DOOR METAL INTACT GRAY 5.94 4/27/2012 16:41 4.47 Negative 0.01 0.03 120 LC Schwan PURCHASING OFFICE FIRST WALL DRYWALL INTACT BLUE 4.09 4/27/2012 16:46 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 121 LC Schwan VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID 4.49 4/27/2012 16:47 VOID VOID VOID VOID 122 LC Schwan PURCHASING OFFICE FIRST WALL DRYWALL INTACT BLUE 6.52 4/27/2012 16:48 3.84 Negative 0.40 0.40 123 LC Schwan FIRE DOOR MAIN FIRST DOOR TRIM METAL INTACT BEIGE 4.08 4/27/2012 16:50 1.23 Negative 0.01 0.02 124 LC Schwan BACK STOR ROOM FIRST WALL CERAMIC INTACT BEIGE 6.56 4/27/2012 16:57 2.10 Positive 7.40 1.00 125 LC Schwan FREEZE #5 EXTERIOR FIRST CABINET METAL INTACT WHITE 4.08 4/27/2012 16:59 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 126 LC Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --RED 11.80 4/27/2012 17:01 1.09 Positive 1.10 0.10 127 LC Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --RED 20.38 4/27/2012 17:03 1.06 Positive 1.00 0.10 128 LC Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --RED 7.15 4/27/2012 17:03 2.79 Positive 1.20 0.20 129 KHS Schwan --SHUTTER CAL ---160.97 4/28/2012 9:13 --3.09 0.00 130 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --RED 8.99 4/28/2012 9:15 1.07 Positive 1.10 0.10 131 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --RED 20.19 4/28/2012 9:16 1.03 Positive 1.00 0.10 132 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --RED 4.69 4/28/2012 9:17 3.07 Positive 1.30 0.30 133 KHS Schwan 142 FIRST DOOR METAL INTACT BLUE 1.62 4/28/2012 9:36 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 134 KHS Schwan 142 FIRST DOORCASING METAL INTACT BLUE 2.45 4/28/2012 9:38 2.95 Negative 0.02 0.06 135 KHS Schwan 142 FIRST DOORCASING METAL FAIR BROWN 2.44 4/28/2012 9:41 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 136 KHS Schwan 142 FIRST WALL CONCRETE FAIR BLUE 2.66 4/28/2012 9:44 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 137 KHS Schwan 142 FIRST WALL CONCRETE INTACT BROWN 4.68 4/28/2012 9:46 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 138 KHS Schwan 142 FIRST WALL CONCRETE INTACT BROWN 3.25 4/28/2012 9:47 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 139 KHS Schwan 142 FIRST WALL METAL INTACT BLACK 2.65 4/28/2012 9:51 1.07 Negative 0.00 0.02 140 KHS Schwan 142 FIRST COLUMN CONCRETE INTACT BLUE 3.27 4/28/2012 9:53 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 141 KHS Schwan VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID 0.82 4/28/2012 9:55 VOID VOID VOID VOID 142 KHS Schwan VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID 3.68 4/28/2012 9:56 VOID VOID VOID VOID 143 KHS Schwan 142 FIRST BEAM METAL INTACT BLUE 2.86 4/28/2012 9:56 4.25 Negative 0.40 0.30 144 KHS Schwan 142 FIRST WALL CONCRETE INTACT BLACK 3.67 4/28/2012 10:00 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 145 KHS Schwan 142 FIRST WALL CONCRETE INTACT GREEN 1.42 4/28/2012 10:00 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 146 KHS Schwan 142 FIRST WALL CONCRETE INTACT RED 4.48 4/28/2012 10:01 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 147 KHS Schwan H06 at entry to commons FIRST COLUMN CONCRETE INTACT WHITE 3.27 4/28/2012 10:08 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 148 KHS Schwan H06 at entry to commons FIRST DOORCASING METAL INTACT GREEN 1.84 4/28/2012 10:09 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 149 KHS Schwan RM 150 FIRST CABINET WOOD INTACT BLUE 2.44 4/28/2012 10:19 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 150 KHS Schwan RM 149 FIRST DOORCASING METAL INTACT GREEN 1.64 4/28/2012 10:28 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 74 of 219 LEAD BASED PAINT SCREENING KODIAK HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION AND RENOVATION HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY REPORT 003126 - D4 Depth IndexNo.SITE INSPECTOR ROOM FLOOR COMPONENT SUBSTRATE CONDITION mg/cm2 Error +/-COLOR Duration Time Results 151 KHS Schwan RM 149 FIRST WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE 1.82 4/28/2012 10:30 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 152 KHS Schwan RM 149 FIRST WALL METAL INTACT WHITE 1.83 4/28/2012 10:32 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 153 KHS Schwan RM 149 FIRST WALL WOOD INTACT BLUE 2.03 4/28/2012 10:39 4.21 Negative 0.03 0.11 154 KHS Schwan RM 149 FIRST WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE 5.51 4/28/2012 10:40 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 155 KHS Schwan VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID 0.40 4/28/2012 10:44 VOID VOID VOID VOID 156 KHS Schwan RM 149 FIRST WINDOW CASING METAL INTACT WHITE 2.84 4/28/2012 10:44 6.27 Negative 0.07 0.17 157 KHS Schwan RM 148 FIRST WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE 3.46 4/28/2012 10:54 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 158 KHS Schwan RM 148 FIRST COLUMN DRYWALL INTACT WHITE 4.29 4/28/2012 10:56 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 159 KHS Schwan RM 148 FIRST WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE 2.46 4/28/2012 10:58 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 160 KHS Schwan RM 148 FIRST WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE 3.46 4/28/2012 10:59 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 161 KHS Schwan RM 148 FIRST WINDOW CASING DRYWALL INTACT WHITE 2.65 4/28/2012 11:00 6.45 Negative 0.08 0.23 162 KHS Schwan RM 148 FIRST WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE 3.88 4/28/2012 11:03 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 163 KHS Schwan RM 147 FIRST WINDOW FRAME METAL INTACT BLACK 2.45 4/28/2012 11:07 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 164 KHS Schwan RM 147 FIRST WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE 3.45 4/28/2012 11:11 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 165 KHS Schwan RM 147 FIRST COLUMN CONCRETE INTACT WHITE 2.64 4/28/2012 11:11 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 166 KHS Schwan RM 147 FIRST WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE 1.42 4/28/2012 11:13 1.71 Negative 0.00 0.03 167 KHS Schwan RM 147 FIRST WALL CONCRETE INTACT WHITE 3.67 4/28/2012 11:16 1.18 Negative 0.00 0.02 168 KHS Schwan RM 145 FIRST EXT. DOOR METAL INTACT ORANGE 1.43 4/28/2012 11:36 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 169 KHS Schwan RM 145 FIRST WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE 1.43 4/28/2012 11:37 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 170 KHS Schwan RM 145 FIRST WALL DRYWALL CHALKING WHITE 1.84 4/28/2012 11:39 1.14 Negative 0.00 0.02 171 KHS Schwan RM 145 FIRST WALL DRYWALL FAIR WHITE 1.63 4/28/2012 11:39 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 172 KHS Schwan RM 145 FIRST MECH EQUIP DRYWALL PEELING BEIGE 1.43 4/28/2012 11:41 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 173 KHS Schwan RM 145 FIRST DOOR METAL POOR GREEN 1.43 4/28/2012 11:43 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 174 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --RED 20.40 4/28/2012 11:50 1.05 Positive 1.00 0.10 175 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --RED 20.38 4/28/2012 11:51 1.06 Positive 1.00 0.10 176 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --RED 14.89 4/28/2012 11:52 2.75 Positive 1.20 0.10 177 KHS Schwan --SHUTTER CAL ---160.91 4/28/2012 18:33 --3.07 0.00 178 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --RED 23.59 4/28/2012 18:35 1.04 Positive 1.00 0.10 179 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --RED 20.76 4/28/2012 18:36 1.02 Positive 1.00 0.10 180 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --RED 24.43 4/28/2012 18:37 2.61 Positive 1.10 0.10 181 KHS Schwan B6 FIRST SINK CERAMIC INTACT WHITE 4.29 4/28/2012 18:42 1.95 Negative 0.02 0.03 182 KHS Schwan B6 FIRST URNAL CERAMIC INTACT WHITE 1.62 4/28/2012 18:43 1.02 Negative 0.01 0.03 183 KHS Schwan B6 FIRST TOILET STAHL DOOR WOOD FAIR GREEN 2.66 4/28/2012 18:45 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 184 KHS Schwan B6 FIRST WALL CONCRETE INTACT WHITE 4.07 4/28/2012 18:47 1.37 Negative 0.00 0.02 185 KHS Schwan B6 FIRST WALL CONCRETE INTACT WHITE 2.24 4/28/2012 18:48 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 186 KHS Schwan B8 FIRST TOILET CERAMIC INTACT WHITE 1.83 4/28/2012 18:53 1.58 Negative 0.02 0.05 187 KHS Schwan B8 FIRST DOOR METAL INTACT BLUE-GREEN 1.23 4/28/2012 18:54 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 188 KHS Schwan J5 FIRST SINK CERAMIC INTACT WHITE 1.84 4/28/2012 19:02 2.16 Positive 28.90 6.60 189 KHS Schwan J5 FIRST SINK UNDERCOATINGCERAMIC INTACT WHITE 4.06 4/28/2012 19:03 1.10 Negative 0.26 0.07 190 KHS Schwan J5 FIRST PIPE METAL FAIR WHITE 3.66 4/28/2012 19:07 10.00 Negative -0.05 1.00 191 KHS Schwan 142 FIRST WALL CONCRETE FAIR WHITE 3.45 4/28/2012 19:20 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 192 KHS Schwan 142 FIRST WALL CONCRETE FAIR WHITE 3.89 4/28/2012 19:20 2.68 Negative 0.01 0.02 193 KHS Schwan B7 FIRST WALL CONCRETE FAIR WHITE 2.25 4/28/2012 19:22 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 194 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --RED 8.56 4/28/2012 19:26 1.09 Positive 1.10 0.10 195 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --RED 9.79 4/28/2012 19:26 1.09 Positive 1.10 0.10 196 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --RED 4.48 4/28/2012 19:27 3.14 Positive 1.40 0.30 197 KHS Schwan --SHUTTER CAL ---162.91 4/28/2012 22:32 --2.97 0.00 198 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --ORANGE 20.24 4/28/2012 22:34 1.10 Positive 1.50 0.10 199 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --ORANGE 20.20 4/28/2012 22:35 1.09 Positive 1.50 0.10 200 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --ORANGE 21.16 4/28/2012 22:36 2.68 Positive 1.60 0.10 AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 75 of 219 LEAD BASED PAINT SCREENING KODIAK HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION AND RENOVATION HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY REPORT 003126 - D5 Depth IndexNo.SITE INSPECTOR ROOM FLOOR COMPONENT SUBSTRATE CONDITION mg/cm2 Error +/-COLOR Duration Time Results 201 KHS Schwan 208 SECOND METAL WALL PANEL METAL INTACT GREEN 4.27 4/28/2012 22:39 2.21 Negative 0.00 0.02 202 KHS Schwan 208 SECOND CABINET WOOD INTACT BLUE 4.07 4/28/2012 22:41 1.51 Negative 0.00 0.02 203 KHS Schwan 208 SECOND DOORCASING METAL INTACT GREEN 1.63 4/28/2012 22:43 1.54 Negative 0.01 0.03 204 KHS Schwan --SHUTTER CAL ---160.96 4/28/2012 22:58 --3.11 0.00 205 KHS Schwan 2nd FLOOR HALL SECOND WALL CONCRETE INTACT WHITE 3.48 4/28/2012 23:01 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 206 KHS Schwan 2nd FLOOR HALL SECOND CMU WALL CONCRETE INTACT WHITE 3.67 4/28/2012 23:01 4.44 Negative 0.01 0.04 207 KHS Schwan 207 SECOND METAL WALL PANEL METAL INTACT BLUE 1.42 4/28/2012 23:04 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 208 KHS Schwan 207 SECOND WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE 2.04 4/28/2012 23:07 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 209 KHS Schwan 206 SECOND WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE 3.26 4/28/2012 23:15 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 210 KHS Schwan 205 SECOND WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE 1.43 4/28/2012 23:20 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 211 KHS Schwan 205 SECOND CABINET WOOD INTACT BEIGE 3.88 4/28/2012 23:22 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 212 KHS Schwan HALL SECOND COLUMN CONCRETE INTACT WHITE 3.67 4/28/2012 23:25 2.69 Negative 0.01 0.02 213 KHS Schwan 204 SECOND WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE 1.63 4/28/2012 23:26 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 214 KHS Schwan 204 SECOND WALL CONCRETE INTACT WHITE 3.67 4/28/2012 23:29 5.80 Negative 0.02 0.05 215 KHS Schwan 203 SECOND WALL CONCRETE INTACT BLACK 3.68 4/28/2012 23:34 1.41 Negative 0.00 0.02 216 KHS Schwan 203 SECOND WALL CONCRETE INTACT PURPLE 3.88 4/28/2012 23:35 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 217 KHS Schwan 203 SECOND WALL CONCRETE INTACT YELLOW 3.47 4/28/2012 23:36 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 218 KHS Schwan 203 SECOND WALL CONCRETE INTACT RED 3.47 4/28/2012 23:36 1.27 Negative 0.00 0.02 219 KHS Schwan 203 SECOND WALL CONCRETE INTACT GREEN 3.66 4/28/2012 23:37 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 220 KHS Schwan 202 SECOND WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE 1.42 4/28/2012 23:53 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 221 KHS Schwan 202A SECOND WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE 1.84 4/28/2012 23:54 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 222 KHS Schwan 202 SECOND WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE 2.04 4/28/2012 23:57 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 223 KHS Schwan 201B SECOND WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE 3.67 4/28/2012 23:59 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 224 KHS Schwan 201B SECOND WALL DRYWALL INTACT BLUE 1.42 4/29/2012 0:00 2.06 Negative 0.02 0.07 225 KHS Schwan 201 SECOND WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE 2.65 4/29/2012 0:13 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 226 KHS Schwan 201 SECOND WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE 2.66 4/29/2012 0:13 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 227 KHS Schwan 201 SECOND WALL CONCRETE INTACT WHITE 3.88 4/29/2012 0:14 1.28 Negative 0.00 0.02 228 KHS Schwan 201A SECOND WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE 2.63 4/29/2012 0:17 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 229 KHS Schwan 201A SECOND METAL WALL PANEL METAL INTACT WHITE 1.42 4/29/2012 0:18 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 230 KHS Schwan HALL SECOND COLUMN CONCRETE INTACT WHITE 4.48 4/29/2012 0:21 2.27 Negative 0.01 0.02 231 KHS Schwan HALL SECOND CMU CONCRETE INTACT WHITE 2.86 4/29/2012 0:21 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 232 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --ORANGE 20.18 4/29/2012 0:25 1.10 Positive 1.60 0.10 233 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --ORANGE 20.40 4/29/2012 0:27 1.08 Positive 1.50 0.10 234 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --ORANGE 22.43 4/29/2012 0:28 2.63 Positive 1.60 0.10 235 KHS Schwan --SHUTTER CAL ---162.90 4/29/2012 7:49 --3.23 0.00 236 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --GREEN 16.31 4/29/2012 7:50 1.00 Negative 0.30 0.03 237 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --ORANGE 20.76 4/29/2012 7:52 1.08 Positive 1.50 0.10 238 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --ORANGE 20.14 4/29/2012 7:53 1.09 Positive 1.60 0.10 239 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --ORANGE 20.59 4/29/2012 7:54 2.71 Positive 1.70 0.10 240 KHS Schwan MECHANICAL RM PENT B METAL STRINGER METAL INTACT RED 20.93 4/29/2012 8:01 1.24 Positive 1.00 0.10 241 KHS Schwan MECHANICAL RM PENT A METAL STRINGER METAL INTACT BROWN 10.37 4/29/2012 8:11 1.45 Positive 3.80 0.20 242 KHS Schwan HALL H001 BSMT WALL CONCRETE FAIR WHITE 3.47 4/29/2012 8:35 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 243 KHS Schwan HALL H001 BSMT WALL CONCRETE FAIR WHITE 3.46 4/29/2012 8:36 1.33 Negative 0.00 0.02 244 KHS Schwan BOYS LOCKER ROOM BSMT DOOR METAL FAIR BROWN 1.43 4/29/2012 8:39 1.41 Negative 0.01 0.03 245 KHS Schwan BOYS LOCKER ROOM BSMT LOCKER METAL INTACT BLUE 1.42 4/29/2012 8:43 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 246 KHS Schwan FACULTY LOCKER RM BSMT LOCKER METAL INTACT RED 2.66 4/29/2012 9:02 1.00 Negative 0.60 0.20 247 KHS Schwan GIRLS LOCKER RM BSMT LOCKER METAL INTACT TAN 2.65 4/29/2012 9:37 4.52 Negative 0.02 0.07 248 KHS Schwan STAIR # 5 BSMT TREAD CONCRETE INTACT BLUE 3.87 4/29/2012 9:53 2.29 Negative 0.01 0.02 249 KHS Schwan STAIR # 5 BSMT HAND RAIL METAL INTACT YELLOW 5.51 4/29/2012 9:58 3.79 Positive 3.00 0.50 250 KHS Schwan WEIGHT ROOM BSMT METAL STRINGER METAL INTACT BLUE 5.71 4/29/2012 10:42 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 76 of 219 LEAD BASED PAINT SCREENING KODIAK HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION AND RENOVATION HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY REPORT 003126 - D6 Depth IndexNo.SITE INSPECTOR ROOM FLOOR COMPONENT SUBSTRATE CONDITION mg/cm2 Error +/-COLOR Duration Time Results 251 KHS Schwan CLIMBING RM FIRST WALL BOARD WOOD POOR BLUE 2.64 4/29/2012 10:49 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 252 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --ORANGE 20.15 4/29/2012 11:04 1.10 Positive 1.60 0.10 253 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --ORANGE 20.29 4/29/2012 11:05 1.08 Positive 1.50 0.10 254 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --ORANGE 20.31 4/29/2012 11:07 2.72 Positive 1.70 0.10 255 KHS Schwan --SHUTTER CAL ---160.94 4/29/2012 11:20 --2.99 0.00 256 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --ORANGE 20.76 4/29/2012 11:22 1.12 Positive 1.60 0.10 257 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --ORANGE 20.37 4/29/2012 11:23 1.09 Positive 1.50 0.10 258 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --ORANGE 20.31 4/29/2012 11:24 2.59 Positive 1.60 0.10 259 KHS Schwan Bath rm in shop FIRST WALL TILE CERAMIC INTACT BEIGE 8.56 4/29/2012 14:20 1.86 Positive 20.90 1.40 260 KHS Schwan HALL AY 132 FIRST WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE 2.85 4/29/2012 14:48 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 261 KHS Schwan HALL AT 132 FIRST CMU WALL CONCRETE INTACT WHITE 4.28 4/29/2012 14:49 1.55 Negative 0.00 0.02 262 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --ORANGE 4.28 4/29/2012 15:30 1.08 Positive 1.50 0.20 263 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --ORANGE 22.21 4/29/2012 15:31 1.09 Positive 1.50 0.10 264 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --ORANGE 7.10 4/29/2012 15:31 1.08 Positive 1.50 0.10 265 KHS Schwan --SHUTTER CAL ---161.02 4/29/2012 15:39 --2.92 0.00 266 KHS Schwan 135 FIRST WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE 1.63 4/29/2012 15:55 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 267 KHS Schwan 135 FIRST WALL CONCRETE INTACT WHITE 3.68 4/29/2012 15:56 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 268 KHS Schwan 123 FIRST WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE 1.63 4/29/2012 16:37 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 269 KHS Schwan 123 FIRST WALL DRYWALL INTACT WHITE 3.66 4/29/2012 16:38 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 270 KHS Schwan VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID 1.22 4/29/2012 17:01 VOID VOID VOID VOID 271 KHS Schwan BOILER RM FIRST WALL DRYWALL INTACT BLUE 3.26 4/29/2012 17:01 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 272 KHS Schwan BOILER RM FIRST DOOR METAL INTACT ORANGE 2.43 4/29/2012 17:03 1.04 Negative 0.03 0.04 273 KHS Schwan BOILER RM FIRST WALL CERAMIC POOR BEIGE 3.64 4/29/2012 17:04 1.00 Negative 0.00 0.02 274 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --ORANGE 12.39 4/29/2012 17:16 1.07 Positive 1.50 0.10 275 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --ORANGE 8.15 4/29/2012 17:16 1.10 Positive 1.60 0.10 276 KHS Schwan --CALIBRATION CK --ORANGE 7.32 4/29/2012 17:17 2.41 Positive 1.50 0.20 AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 77 of 219 LEAD BASED PAINT SCREENING KODIAK HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION AND RENOVATION HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY REPORT 003126 - D7 Depth IndexNo.SITE INSPECTOR ROOM FLOOR COMPONENT SUBSTRATE CONDITION mg/cm2 Error +/-COLOR Duration Time Results Table Heading Descriptions: Ssec:This is the nominal time in seconds that each sample was analyzed. Depth IndeIndicates the relative depth of the lead. A Depth Index (DI) of less than 1.5 indicates lead very near the surface layer of paint. A DI greater than 4.0 indicates the lead paint is deeply buried beneath multiple layers of paint. LBP:Results are shown as positive (POS > 1.0 mg/cm2), inconclusive (INC) or negative (NEG < 1.0 mg/cm2). The results are based on the combined results of the K and L shell readings. L shell and K shell readings are not provided. Positive results are also in bold print. mg/cm2:This is the testing results produced by the NITON XLi-303 instrument in milligrams of lead per square centimeter (mg/cm2). The EPA defines lead based paint as paint containing lead at 1.0 mg/cm2 or greater. A negative number is a result of an internal computation made by the instrument and should be interpreted as zero. Even though paint may be termed negative ( less than 1.0 mg/cm2) by EPA definition, disturbance of the paint may still be regulated by OSHA under 29 CFR 1926.62. Where lead is present at any level, appropriate engineering controls, work practices and personal protective equipment should be used until a negative exposure assessment can be determined. VOID:This indicates that the test was intentionally terminated by the operator due to operator error (e.g. - operator moved analyzer while testing). KHS Kodiak High School LC Learning Center AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 78 of 219 APPENDIX C Drawings of Sample Locations AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 79 of 219 AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 80 of 219 AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 81 of 219 AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 82 of 219 AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 83 of 219 AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 84 of 219 AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 85 of 219 AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 86 of 219 AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 87 of 219 AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 88 of 219 AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 89 of 219 Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building - 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska i KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ADMINISTRATION BUILDING LIMITED INDOOR AIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT SUMMARY REPORT 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA Prepared For: Mr. Corey Wall, AIA Principal Architect, Jensen Yorba Wall, Inc Assessment Date: March 16-17, 2020 Report Date: May 1, 2020 Prepared By: EHS-ALASKA, INC. ENGINEERING, HEALTH & SAFETY CONSULTANTS 11901 BUSINESS BLVD., SUITE 208 EAGLE RIVER, ALASKA 99577 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 90 of 219 Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building - 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska ii LIMITED INDOOR AIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT KIB ADMINISTRATION BUILDING - 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................... 1 FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS: ..................................................................................................................... 2 RECOMMENDATIONS: ............................................................................................................................... 2 1.0 VISUAL INSPECTION – BUILDING INFORMATION ........................................................................... 3 2.0 GENERAL MOLD INFORMATION ........................................................................................................ 4 3.0 SAMPLE COLLECTION METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................... 4 3.1 Mold Sampling ............................................................................................................................ 4 3.2 Carpet Dust Characterization ..................................................................................................... 5 3.3 Radon Testing ............................................................................................................................ 5 3.4 IAQ Monitoring ............................................................................................................................ 5 4.0 FUNGI DATA INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES ................................................................................. 6 5.0 AIRBORNE MOLD SAMPLING RESULTS ........................................................................................... 7 5.1 CARPET CHARACTERIZATION SAMPLING RESULTS .............................................................. 7 6.0 IAQ MONITORING RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS ............................................................................ 8 6.1 IAQ Monitoring Results ............................................................................................................... 8 6.1.1 Carbon Dioxide and Carbon Monoxide ................................................................................... 9 6.1.2 Airborne Particulates - “Dust” ............................................................................................... 11 6.1.3 Volatile Organic Compounds ................................................................................................ 12 6.1.4 Temperature & Relative Humidity ......................................................................................... 13 7.0 RADON TESTING RESULTS ............................................................................................................. 14 8.0 RECOMMENDATION .......................................................................................................................... 15 9.0 LIMITATIONS/STANDARD OF CARE ................................................................................................ 15 ATTACHMENTS Attachment A ............................................................................................................................... Key Figures Attachment B ...................................................................................................... Lab Results & Accreditation Attachment C ........................................................................................................ Sample Location Sketches Attachment D ....................................................................................................... EVM-7 Meter Certifications AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 91 of 219 Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building - 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 1 LIMITED INDOOR AIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT KIB ADMINISTRATION BUILDING - 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA SUMMARY EHS-Alaska was requested to perform a Limited Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) assessment of the Kodiak Island Borough (KIB) Administration Building, located at 710 Mill Bay Road in Kodiak, Alaska. The purpose of the assessment was three-fold: 1) Characterize the fungal ecology, including sampling of carpet dust and debris; 2) Evaluate the monitored environmental parameters for levels of Carbon Dioxide, Carbon Monoxide, Volatile Organic Compounds, Airborne Particulates, Temperature, Relative Humidity and Dew Point; and 3) Perform radon testing. Concurrent with the IAQ assessment, EHS-Alaska performed a limited hazardous materials survey as a part of the design services for the Mechanical Upgrades project for the Kodiak Island Borough, which was limited to the Boiler Room, Crawlspace, and the Fan Room. The Hazardous Materials Survey report was submitted as a separate report to Jensen Yorba Wall, Inc. Mr. Martin K. Schwan, Industrial Hygienist of EHS-Alaska, Inc. (EHS-Alaska) conducted the limited IAQ Assessment in March 2020. Key figures with narrative are included in Attachment A. Characterization of the Fungal Ecology The results of the airborne mold spore sampling on March 16, 2020 suggest that the fungal ecology on the date of the sampling was characterized as “a normal fungal ecology” as defined by the IICRC S520. The types of molds present in the samples collected are representative of typical indoor environments and the levels did not indicate that fungal amplification was occurring. Molds known to product mycotoxins such as Stachybotrys and Chaetomium were not identified in the air samples. See section 5.0. The visual inspection did not identify suspect fungal growth but we did note several conditions that have the potential to promote mold growth or affect the indoor air such as the foundation waterproofing and the exterior grade contributing to long-term chronic water intrusion into the crawlspace (see figures 2-14), moldy and musty odors noted in the closet storage area in vacant office 108 in the loose carpet (see figures 18-19), condensation on windows with broken seals throughout (see figure 23, typical), unsealed backsplash behind the sink in room 223 (see figures 25 & 26), under-insulated or displaced insulation in exterior walls (see figures 31-36); staining around the lower level drinking fountain on the vinyl wall covering (see figure 38), and displaced floor tiles in the Building Permit (west) bathroom (see figure 39). The direct microscopic examination of the carpet entrapments (dust & debris) collected from 5 representative areas of the Administration Building, were dominated by cellulose fibers, skin cells, and amorphous debris; contained lower levels of hair and synthetic fibers; and few mites, pollen, fungal spores and hyphal fragments. See section 5.1. Evaluation of Environmental Parameters The results of the IAQ monitoring from March 16-18 showed trends suggesting that the environmental parameters monitored were generally below regulatory limits and recommended guidelines. See section 6. • Carbon dioxide (CO2) levels exhibited the characteristic gradual build-up in the morning as the area became occupied and subsequent dilution effect of the ventilation system. • Carbon Monoxide (CO) monitoring indicate low levels of CO are present but are below levels know to result in health effects. • Airborne Particulates – “Dust” levels were below OSHA PEL and ACGIH recommendation for respirable particles. • Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) were measurable in Office 226. The accumulated cleaners noted on the filing cabinets in that room could be the source. • Temperatures in the Assembly Chambers trended above the recommended ASHRAE comfort range for winter months but the temperature trends in the Conference Room – Lower Level and Office 226 were within the ASHRAE recommended winter temperature range. • Humidity levels were below 60% which is recommended to reduce the conditions for microbial growth. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 92 of 219 Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building - 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 2 Radon Testing • The results of the radon testing from March 16-18, 2020 were below 4 pCi/L in all areas tested (see Table 7.0) FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS: Please refer to the Key Figures in Attachment A, which help illustrate the findings of the visual assessment. 1) Ground and surface water intrusion is occurring along the exterior walls resulting in water in the crawlspace, corrosion of metal and deterioration of building members. See Figures 2-14. 2) We noted high grade around the sump pump located in the crawlspace of the 2-story, east half, near center of south side along interior foundation wall. See figure 6. 3) Offices were generally free of signs and symptoms of accumulated dust and debris, water staining (past or current) and deteriorated surfaces. See Figures 16-17. 4) We did not find current signs of water intrusion occurring from above the ceiling, plumbing leaks, or other sources of moisture that was resulting in or promoting fungal growth. 5) Moldy and musty odors were noted in the closet storage area in vacant office 108 in the loose carpet but there were no currently wet areas or signs of water intrusion on the walls and ceiling. See figure 18. 6) “Pillbugs” are a potential sign of damp conditions and some were noted in the lower level. See figure 19. 7) Exhaust air louvers were noted with particular build-up-up but is was not characterized as excessive. See figure 20. 8) We noted potted plants throughout the office space, but they did not appear to be contributing airborne fungal spore levels above what is considered a “normal fungal ecology”. See figure 21. 9) Thermal discomfort was the chief complaint among occupants who indicated it was either too cold or too hot. Portable space heaters were noted in several offices. See figure 22. 10) Windows throughout the building were noted to have broken seals and condensation potentially contributing to thermal discomfort. See figures 23-24. 11) Unsealed backsplash was noted in the sink in room 223 and water intrusion behind the backsplash is likely occurring. See figure 23A-D. 12) Particulate matter build-up on ceilings and walls was not characterized as excessive. See figure 30 (typical). 13) Inadequate wall insulation and displaced insulation was noted - potentially contributing to thermal discomfort. See figures 31-35. 14) Condensate drain lines in the mechanical room were not piped to the floor drain and the concrete floor was wet, and the crawlspace below showed chronic water stains. See figure 36. 15) We noted visible entrapments along the top of the wall in the fabric wall covering in the Conference Room – Lower level, but it was not characterized as fungal growth or deemed a major concern. The entrapment was characterized as particulate matter and likely a result of building pressure differences. See Figures 37. 16) We noted staining around the lower level drinking fountain on the vinyl wall covering. It was currently dry and there was no suspect fungal growth or moldy or musty odors. See figure 38. 17) Signs of past water leaks were noted in the west restroom in the Building Permit offices but there were no odors and it was currently dry, and the occupant did not have any concerns of poor IAQ. See figure 39. 18) The recycling area did not have objectionable odors and the empty bins were not characterized as being excessively dirty. See figure 40. 19) We noted open storage of various cleaning and disinfecting products in Office 226 and there were measurable levels of VOCs in the room. See figure 41 & 42. 20) We noted physically damaged asbestos “hard fittings” in the lower level mechanical fan room and asbestos debris in the crawlspace. See Figures 43-45. 21) We noted that the crawlspace access hatches were secured but the hatch door do not have a gasket which can allow objectionable odors into occupied areas. See Figure 46. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Address drainage, foundation waterproofing and grade issues resulting in water intrusion into the crawlspace. 2. Regrade the area around the sump pump located in the crawlspace of the 2-story, east half, near center of south side along interior foundation wall. The grade around the sump pump should slope towards the sump pump to better collect surface water. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 93 of 219 Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building - 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 3 3. Further investigate the moldy and musty odors noted in the closet storage room in office 108. Remove carpet and visually inspect stored items for visible suspect fungal growth. 4. The thermal discomfort concerns will hopefully be addressed as part of the mechanical upgrades project schedule for the summer of 2020. 5. Consider a complete window replacement project as part of an energy upgrade to include additional building envelope insulation (note that this may also disturb the Cement Asbestos Board insulated wall panels above and below the windows). 6. Seal the backsplash behind the sink in room 223. 7. Remove and replace the water stained wall covering around the fountain in the lower level hall. 8. Provide proper storage for cleaning products and proper labelling of unmarked containers. 9. Clean up the asbestos debris in the crawlspace and remove asbestos-contaminated soils. 10. Seal the crawlspace hatches with proper gaskets. 1.0 VISUAL INSPECTION – BUILDING INFORMATION The KIB Administration Building was visually inspection using the guidelines found in ASTM E2418 Standard Guide for Readily Observable Mold and Conditions Conducive to Mold in Commercial Buildings: Baseline Survey Process. The building was originally constructed in 1968-69 as a 152 pupil student dormitory for the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA). The building consists of a 2-story (reference) north wing aligned east to west, and a 1-story (reference) south wing that sits at the same elevation as the second level of the north wing. The building was converted into an office building circa 1996 and occupied by the Kodiak Island Borough, but few changes have been made since its original construction. The exterior walls and primary partitions in the building were concrete masonry units (CMU). The exterior CMU was covered at some time by painted cedar lap siding and metal along the perimeter soffit. The exterior walls did not exhibit signs of deterioration and appears to have been well maintained. Grade around the building appears to be sloped towards the building and water intrusion into the crawlspace was evident. See Key Figures 2-14 in Attachment A. The roof was a fairly new PVC and scuppers were noted along the roof but the roof was included in the inspection, but we did not note signs of roof leaks on the ceiling directly below it except for in the lower level fan room with the high ceiling and some in the boiler room. Presumably, the leaks may have been from past leaks at roof penetrations and likely were corrected when the roof was replaced. Occupants on the upper levels indicated that they were not aware of any current roof leaks. Windows appear to be the originally installed windows and have Cement asbestos board (CAB) above and below them as well as under the soffit. Windows with broken seals were noted throughout the building and condensation was noted on them. We noted minor staining on windowsills, but we did not see any suspect fungal growth. See figures 23 & 24. Walls along the corridor are CMU as are walls separating the fan room, restrooms, plumbing chases, and utility rooms from adjacent offices. Walls separating offices were typically framed gypsum wallboard walls with integrated bookshelves and closets left over from the original construction with exposed or covered with carpet original vinyl asbestos 9”x9” floor tiles. Walls were in good condition and with minor wear and tear, but we did not note deterioration from water intrusion in the occupied areas that were inspected. Ceilings were typically of 2’ x 4’ acoustic ceiling tiles or gypsum wallboard and only a few areas were noted to have minor staining or ghosting. Floors had a variety of different carpets with most showing signs of wear and tear. Carpet was placed over the original asbestos-containing 9”x9” VAT. Some areas were noted with a sheet vinyl such as the 2nd level restrooms that was reported to contain asbestos. Other rooms such as Conference Room 116, had both carpet and laminate flooring assumed to have been placed over the original 9”x9” VAT. The building was heated by a hydronic heating system combined with various fan coil units supplying ventilation and heating. The heating and domestic water piping was typically insulated with fiberglass with "hard and chalky" asbestos-containing insulation at fittings in the crawl space. Some abatement of the asbestos pipe insulation was AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 94 of 219 Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building - 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 4 noted in the crawlspace particularly along the (reference) north side of the crawlspace on the lines running between the main heat piping and the branch leading to the room above. Newer black foam rubber insulation was noted on those leaders. The crawlspace under the (reference) south portion of the building (portion with the Assembly Chamber) was noted to have asbestos “hard fittings” on heat piping and we noted asbestos insulation debris as well as actual large pieces of “hard fitting” insulation on the ground of the crawlspace. The asbestos debris was also noted to have been washed into the gravel by periodic ground water flooding. The north portion of the crawlspace has pooling ground water and there is a vapor barrier ground covering but it is covered with crushed rock apparently brought in at some unknown date – perhaps to raise the ground level above the pooling water. The sump pump noted at the west access hatch of the north building portion crawlspace was not hooked up. We recommend that only authorized personnel with proper PPE enter the crawlspace. The crawlspace access hatches were secured but the hatches are not tight fitting and we recommend proper gasketed hatches. A mixture of fiberglass insulation and asbestos “hard fitting” insulation was noted on piping in both the fan room and the boiler room, but it appeared that the insulation was fiberglass insulation in the plumbing chases, but access was very limited and therefore we assume some ACM insulation will be present in the plumbing chases and in inaccessible areas such as in walls and the ceiling or attic spaces. 2.0 GENERAL MOLD INFORMATION Molds are found in virtually every environment and can be detected indoors and outdoors year-round. Molds reproduce by means of tiny spores, which are extremely small and usually not visible to the naked eye. Mold spores spread by floating through outdoor and indoor air. Outdoors, molds play a part in nature by breaking down organic matter such as fallen leaves and dead trees. Mold may begin growing indoors when mold spores land on surfaces that are wet. Although there are thousands of types (genus-species) of molds, a relatively small number account for most indoor and water damage situations. Some molds are considered worse (more allergenic or toxic) than others. The most “common” mold Cladosporium is widespread inside and outside and is typically not considered as “bad” as some other molds. The wet “black” molds Chaetomium and Stachybotrys often occur on sheetrock and are considered “problem” molds. They have large spores and tend not to occur at high levels in the air unless disturbed. They require very damp conditions for growth. The most common “problem” molds are Aspergillus- Penicillium. They require only moderately damp conditions for growth. They have very small spores which easily become airborne. Currently, there are no federal standards or recommendations for acceptable exposures to airborne concentrations of mold or mold spores. Research on the health effects of mold exposure is ongoing. According to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), most typical indoor air exposures to mold do not present a risk of adverse health effects. Molds can cause adverse effects by producing allergens (substances that can cause allergic reactions). For those people who are sensitive to molds, exposure can cause symptoms such as nasal stuffiness, eye irritation, wheezing, or skin irritation. Severe reactions may occur among workers exposed to large amounts of molds in occupational settings, such as farmers working around moldy hay. Severe reactions may include fever and shortness of breath. Potential health concerns as well as building damage are important reasons to prevent mold growth and to remediate existing problem areas. The advice of a medical professional should always be sought if there are any emerging health issues. Since mold spores are ever-present in the environment, it is virtually impossible to make a building mold-free. The goal of any remediation efforts is to remove the mold “growth” after ensuring all water intrusion problems have been corrected and return the area to Condition 1 or that which represents normal fungal ecology. Workers who disturb mold spores should use good work practices and follow the guidelines in IICRC S520, Standard and Reference Guide for Professional Mold Remediation. 3.0 SAMPLE COLLECTION METHODOLOGY 3.1 Mold Sampling Air sampling was conducted using Air-O-Cell sampling cassettes provided by the lab. Air sampling for total fungal spores was conducted by drawing a measured amount of air at a specific flow rate (15 liters per minute) through sampling cassettes. A calibrated, high volume vacuum pump was used to draw air into the cassettes where dust and spores impacted a glass slide within the cassette housing. Sample identification numbers were written on each cassette for identification. Sample cassettes were sealed with tape and placed within a “zip-lock” bag to prevent AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 95 of 219 Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building - 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 5 contamination during shipping. The sample cassettes were air freighted to EMLab P&K for analysis. EMLab P&K is accredited by the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) Environmental Microbiology Laboratory Accreditation Program (EMLAP) and participates in the AIHA Environmental Microbiology Proficiency Analytical Testing Program (EMPAT). Air sample results are summarized in Tables 5A. Lab results and lab accreditation are included as Attachment B. 3.2 Carpet Dust Characterization Carpet trappings were collected using a vacuum technique. A PCM (0.8µm filter) sampling cassette equipped with a short intake nozzle of vinyl tubing was connected to a vacuum pump via vinyl tubing and samples were collected using a flow rate sufficient to collect carpet entrapments. Vacuuming continued until a minimum of 1.5 grams of entrapments were collected. Sampling cassettes were sealed and individually placed in a zip lock baggie. Samples were submitted to EMLab P&K for analysis. The laboratory examined the dusts and debris captured in each sampling cassette in an optical microscope, identified the debris components and calculated the percent of the total that each classification of debris represented out of the whole “trappings” in the sample. EMLab P&K is staffed by certified microbiologists, maintains a rigorous Quality Assurance Program, is accredited by the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) Environmental Microbiology Laboratory Accreditation Program (EMLAP) and participates in the AIHA Environmental Microbiology Proficiency Analytical Testing Program (EMPAT). See Appendix B for laboratory reports. See Appendix B for laboratory credentials. 3.3 Radon Testing Radon is a colorless, odorless, chemically un-reactive (inert) gas that is produced by the decomposition of naturally occurring uranium in rock and soils. It easily penetrates common building materials like gypsum boards, concrete block, mortar, tarpaper, wood paneling and most insulation. Radon can enter buildings through cracks and gaps in concrete slabs and through the annular spaces around penetrations in the slab. Well water can also be a source of radon. Radon is nine times heavier than air and tends to settle in the lowest areas of buildings such as basements, which is also typically where it enters the building. Radon is considered to be carcinogenic. Levels vary greatly depending on the composition of bedrock and soils, as well as the moisture level and other soil factors, but elevated levels have been found in every state. According to the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the average indoor radon level is ≈ 1.3 pCi/L. The greatest concern is in residential buildings because occupants spend the majority of their time there, but commercial buildings and schools may also result in occupant exposures. The EPA recommends that residents act to lower radon levels in the home if the level is equal to or greater than 4.0 pCi/L. It is estimated that nearly 1 out of every 15 homes in the United States may have elevated radon levels (https://www.epa.gov/radon. More information about radon can be found at the following links: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-02/documents/2012_a_citizens_guide_to_radon.pdf https://www.epa.gov/radon/health-risk-radon The radon testing was performed using short term test kits provided by EMSL Analytical, Inc. The lab is NRPP accredited and participates in the National Radon Proficiency Program. The lab is located at 200 Route 130 North in Cinnaminson, New Jersey. Sample media consisted of an activated charcoal liquid scintillation detector and was analyzed by EMSL using a liquid scintillation counter using approved EPA analysis protocols for Radon in Air Testing. Samples were placed in 5 representative areas of the KIB Administration building while the ventilation system was operating as it normally would during occupied periods. Sampling times were for a minimum 48 hour sampling period. 3.4 IAQ Monitoring EHS-Alaska conducted IAQ monitoring using three 3M Quest EVM-7 environmental monitors to record levels of volatile organic compounds, “dust” (sub-10 micron airborne particulates), carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, temperature, relative humidity, and Dew Point. The 3 meters were placed in the Assembly Chamber, Office 226, and the Conference Room in the lower level. See Table 6.1A for a summary of the EVM-7 monitoring results. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 96 of 219 Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building - 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 6 • The EVM-7’s Volatile Organic Compounds sensitivity range is between 0-2000 parts per million. • The EVM-7 utilizes a 90° light scattering integrating photometer to measure the airborne particulate matter (“Dust”) size in the range of 0.1 to 10 microns (1 µm = .000001 meter) and at concentrations from 0.001 to 199.9 mg/m3. The EVM-7 has a built-in rotary impactor to limit the particulates counted to below 10 microns. This particulate size is considered “Thoracic” and only partially measures the “respirable” particulates regulated by OSHA (<4 microns). • The Carbon Dioxide is measured using Non-Dispersive Infrared (NDIR) with a sensitivity range of 0-20,000 parts per million (ppm). • The Carbon Monoxide is measured using an Electrochemical sensor with a range of 0-1,000 parts per million (ppm). 4.0 FUNGI DATA INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES There are no federal or state regulatory standards for “acceptable” airborne levels of mold in the indoor environment. Mold is a natural part of our environment and ubiquitous with the built environment, and most testing will result in identifying some levels of mold. Mold is usually not a problem indoors unless there is a moisture accumulation problem causing the mold to grow rapidly. When airborne testing is done, it is usually to compare the levels and types of mold spores found inside the affected portions of the building with those found in unaffected areas of the building or a non-suspect “control” area, or to outdoor levels. When bulk or tape lift sampling is done, it is usually to characterize whether the suspect fungal growth is actual mold growth, to determine the predominating spore type present, and to assess the distribution of miscellaneous mold spores present. No bulk samples were collected. In order to better understand sample results, a brief discussion of interpretation guidelines for mold sampling is provided. According to the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH), “Data from individual sampling episodes is often interpreted with respect to baseline data from other environments or the same environment under anticipated low exposure conditions.” In the absence of established acceptable exposure limits, it is often helpful to use indicator molds to assess the fungal ecology. The three indicator molds are Cladosporium, Penicillium/Aspergillus, and Stachybotrys. The presence of Cladosporium (Ascospores and even Basidiospores) is suggestive of a normal fungal ecology. However elevated levels of Cladosporium could indicate mold growth on wood, plywood or Oriented Strand Board. Levels of Penicillium/Aspergillus, (which are two different molds, but they are not distinguishable under direct microscopic examination), above 1,000 spores per cubic meter are associated with damp conditions and the spores are light and fluffy and aerosolize readily. The presence of Stachybotrys at any level should be interpreted with caution because the spores are big and sticky and they do not aerosolize readily so levels approaching 80-100 spores per cubic meter are suggestive that a water released was not identified in a timely manner or there is a chronic water leak because Stachybotrys grows under wet conditions. The following is a list of data interpretation guidelines that were used to facilitate conclusions from the airborne mold sampling results obtained during the sampling: 1. No amplified airborne spore counts above levels found in control areas and/or the outdoor controls. Results represent “normal fungal ecology” when compared to non-affected areas. Mold Assessors frequently look at the Penicillium/Aspergillus levels when assessing the fungal ecology. Experience suggests that levels above 1000 spores/cubic meter may result in occupant discomfort. No outdoor sample was collected. 2. Certain fungal genera, such as Aspergillus, Penicillium, Chaetomium, Fusarium, Stachybotrys, and others may be potentially toxigenic. The presence of a few spores or low relative concentrations of potentially toxic fungi should be interpreted with caution. 3. Certain fungal genera, such as Acremonium, Alternaria, Aspergillus, Penicillium, Chaetomium, Fusarium, Trichoderma, Stachybotrys, and others may be indicative of high-water activity. The presence of a few spores or low relative concentrations of potential water indicator fungi should be interpreted with caution. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 97 of 219 Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building - 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 7 5.0 AIRBORNE MOLD SAMPLING RESULTS On March 16, 2020, seven air samples were collected from representative areas of the KIB Administration Building. The purpose of the sampling was to characterize the fungal ecology to determine if it represents a “normal fungal ecology”. Occupants who were questioned did not have specific complaints about potential mold or moldy and musty odors; and the visible inspection did not reveal visible suspect fungal growth, signs or symptoms of active water intrusion, or conditions known to cause or suspected to promote fungal growth in the occupied areas inspected. Laboratory results and accreditation are included in Attachment B. No outside samples were collected. The types of molds present in the samples collected are representative of typical indoor environments and the levels did not indicate that fungal amplification was occurring. All total spore counts were relatively low. There were no current signs and symptoms that water intrusion is occurring in the KIB Administration Building, and no visible suspect fungal growth was noted in the areas accessed. The closet storage area in office 108 did have a moldy and musty odor but we did not note signs of previous wetting or visible mold, and it was the only area that had Penicillium/Aspergillus although the level was only 110 spores per cubic meter. However, we did see “Pillbugs” under the carpet suggesting that conditions were damp at one time and there were hyphal fragments, so we assume there was some growth at one time promoted by at least “damp” conditions. There is a potential for hidden mold in the walls or even on some of the stored items in the storage closet. We did not see visible suspect fungal growth behind the cove base in the area where we observed the greatest moldy odor and we did not cut into the wall to look for hidden mold. We classify the fungal ecology as being representative of “normal fungal ecology”. Table 5A – KIB Administration Building Airborne Mold Sampling Results, March 16, 2020. Sample/ Area Total Spores (Spores /m3) Penicillium/ Aspergillus (spores/m3) Stachy- botrys (spores/m3) Clado- sporium (spores/m3) Basidio- spores (spores/m3) Asco- spores (spores/m3) A01 / Office 108 230 110 None Detected None Detected 53 53 A02 / Office 115 110 None Detected None Detected None Detected None Detected 110 A03 / Lower Level Conference Room 13 None Detected None Detected None Detected 13 None Detected A04 / Office 101 27 None Detected None Detected None Detected 13 13 A05 / Assembly Chambers 53 None Detected None Detected 13 13 27 A06 / Office 223 160 None Detected None Detected 53 110 None Detected A07 / Office 226 93 None Detected None Detected 13 13 40 5.1 CARPET CHARACTERIZATION SAMPLING RESULTS On March 16, 2020 five samples of dust and debris trapped in the carpet (trappings) were collected from representative areas of the KIB Administration Building. The overall profile in the carpet trapping characterization were quite consistent for all samples, indicating that the areas have similar make-up and cleaning efforts include uniform technique. The major percent of the carpet trappings included approximately 60% (by weight) of cellulose fibers and skin cells. It is not surprising to see that skin cells make up on average about 20% of the entrapments AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 98 of 219 Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building - 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 8 and the high percent of cellulose fibers can be attributed to paperwork, plants and plant-based material which were prevalent throughout the building. The levels of Amorphous debris, which ranged from 6-23% in the samples collected, is an indication of the amount of non-biological particulate matter and could be associated with the “soot” noted on diffusers which the source is highly likely the ventilation system. Dirt and sand are examples of amorphous debris. The low percentage of fungal spores and hyphal fragments reinforced the airborne mold sampling results which also indicated that mold was considered what is termed as a “normal fungal ecology” and therefore suggestive that airborne mold levels should not be resulting in occupant discomfort. The overall profile in all of the samples were significantly similar and we concluded that contributions to poor indoor air quality from carpet trappings are low. Occupants who were questioned did not indicate that respiratory health issues were a concern. Using HEPA filtered vacuum cleaners as part of the normal cleaning efforts would be beneficial by stopping the re- entrainment of dusts, pollen, mold spores, asbestos, etc. which are often re-distributed from the carpets into the air by “normal” vacuum cleaners. The results are summarized in Tables 5B below. Laboratory results are included in Appendix B. Table 5B KIB Administration Building Carpet Trapping Characterization Profile on March 16, 2020 Trapping KIB 2003-C01 Office 108 (%) KIB 2003-C02 Office 115 (%) KIB 2003-C03 Conference Rm (%) KIB 2003-C04 Assembly Chambers (%) KIB 2003-C05 Office 226 (%) Amorphous Debris 6 20 23 15 15 Animal Hair 3 0 0 2 0 Cellulose Fibers 35 40 40 45 40 Epithelial (skin) Cells 25 25 20 15 18 Fungal Spores 1 1 1 1 1 Glass Fiber 1 0 2 1 1 Gypsum Dust 7 0 0 5 5 Human Hair 10 7 5 5 5 Hyphal Fragments 1 1 0 1 1 Insect Parts 0 0 0 0 1 Metal 3 0 0 0 0 Other (Wood, Trichome, etc.) 0 2 0 2 2 Paint-like particles 1 1 3 3 5 Pollen 0 2 1 1 1 Synthetic Fibers 5 1 5 3 3 Wood Chips 1 0 0 0 0 6.0 IAQ MONITORING RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS 6.1 IAQ Monitoring Results The results of the environmental monitoring in three areas of the KIB Administration Building during the March 16- 18, 2020 monitoring period are summarized in Table 6.1A below and graphically shown in the following subsections. Table 6.1B lists the regulatory limits or recommended guidelines. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 99 of 219 Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building - 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 9 Table 6.1A Summary of CO2, CO, Dust, VOCs, Temp., RH, and Dew Point - March 16-18, 2020 Carbon Dioxide (ppm) Carbon Monoxide (ppm) “Dust” (mg/m3) VOCs (ppm) Temp. (̊F) Relative Humidity (%) Dew Point (̊F) Conference Room – Lower Level – March 16-18, 2020 Average 390 1 0.037 0 73.4 25.9 36.5 Max 1,555 3 0.100 0.20 77 30.6 39.9 Min 328 0 0.014 0 71.1 19.0 32 Assembly Chambers March 16-18, 2020 Average 475 0 0.003 0.0 78.4 17.7 32.4 Max 974 4 0.041 0.60 82 20.1 36 Min 379 0 0.0 0 76.5 14.5 32 Office 226 March 16-18, 2020 Average 219 0 0.0 0.6 73 20.4 32.4 Max 581 1 0.022 0.80 75.2 24.3 35.2 Min 171 0 0.0 0.0 71.4 13.4 32 Table 6.1B Regulatory Limits Agency Carbon Dioxide (ppm) Carbon Monoxide (ppm) “Dust” Respirable (mg/m3) VOCs5 (ppm) Temp. (̊F) Relative Humidity (%) ACGIH1 5000 T 30,000 S 25 T 3 T - - - OSHA1, 2 5000 T 30,000 S 35 T 200 S 5 T - - - ASHRAE3 700 above outside level- or ~1,100 - - - Winter: 68.5-75 ºF Summer 75-80.5 ºF Max 60 NIOSH 5000 T 30,000 S 35 T - NAAQS1, 4 - 9 T 35 S 5 T - - - 1Number followed by T = Time Weighted Average, S = Short Term Exposure Limit. 2OSHA PEL for CO2 is from Federal OSHA, the OSHA PEL’s for CO is from State of Alaska DOL&WM. The OSHA PEL listed is for “Respirable” dusts which includes particulates larger than the PM2.5 measured by this survey. 3ASHRAE Recommended Winter levels shown, Recommended Summer Levels are 72.5-78.8ºF. 4National Ambient Air Quality Standards (40 CFR part 50; NAAQS), which are outdoor levels set for cities or municipalities. 5 Refer to individual VOCs for regulatory limits. The following sections include graphs of the trends in the environmental parameters and discussion of the results for the lower level Conference Room, Office 226, and the Assembly Chambers over the monitoring period from March 16-18, 2020. 6.1.1 Carbon Dioxide and Carbon Monoxide The graph of the carbon dioxide (CO2) monitoring did not indicate that the levels exceeded the ASHRAE recommended levels. One event in the lower level conference room suggest a spike of 1,555 ppm which was correlated to the time the meter was being set-up but other than that, the CO2 trend in the lower level conference room indicate slight increase in the CO2 during time that area of the building was being occupied around 8 AM. Office 226, which is not normally occupied, exhibited the same trends on 3/17 and 3/18 during occupied times and the peaks noted on 3/16 between 3-5 PM could be attributed to workers who earlier asked if their presence would affect the results as they had some printing to do. Since CO2 outside baseline levels should be around 380-400 ppm, it is likely that the sensor is out of calibration, and a correction factor of 200 ppm would normalize the graphical representation of the data. The CO2 levels in the Assembly chambers indicate it was occupied late in the afternoon of the 16th, and during the middle of the day on both the 17th and the 18th and EHS confirmed that at least 2 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 100 of 219 Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building - 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 10 individuals were on a conference call during the 17th around midday. The level of CO2 will increase during occupied times and it will be diluted by the ventilation system. The graph demonstrates increases in CO2 levels were associated with times when the area was occupied and subsequently diluted by the ventilation system during the day. It is important to note that CO2 is not considered a contaminant or pollutant at the levels normally measured in buildings (400 to 2000 ppm). It is however widely recognized as an indicator of ventilation rates inside buildings. Certain levels of CO2 indoors correspond to various cfm/person ventilation rates. CO2 is one of the only parameters that can actually measure the amount of fresh air that is being delivered to a space based on its occupancy. The purpose of measuring CO2 levels was to identify if the area was being ventilated adequately and the results indicate that adequate ventilation was occurring because the level of CO2 was obviously being diluted as noted in the graph. The primary source of CO2 in occupied areas is the exhalation from the occupants. Other potential sources include exhausts from vehicles or small motors. If the source is from a vehicle for example, we would expect to see a corresponding carbon monoxide (CO) peak. When we examined the CO levels, we did not note increases in CO, and therefore concluded that the levels were not attributed to vehicle exhaust or other potential products of combustion. Conference Room Lower Level Carbon Dioxide Levels March 16-18, 2020 Office 226 Carbon Dioxide Levels March 16-18, 2020 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 101 of 219 Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building - 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 11 Assembly Chambers Carbon Dioxide Levels March 16-18, 2020 Carbon Monoxide (CO) levels did not approach regulatory limits in the 3 areas included in the monitoring. However, there is an indication that low levels of CO were present in the lower level Conference Room throughout the monitoring period, but the average of 1 ppm CO could be due to sensor drift, or it could be from a fuel-fired appliance, or traffic from the adjacent Mill Bay Road. The conference room is adjacent to the mechanical fan room but there is no fuel-fired equipment in the fan room, so we do not know what the potential source might be. We recommend placing a CO monitor with a digital readout where the max CO levels can be viewed for a week to confirm our results. There was a CO spike of 4 ppm (still quite low) in the Assemble Chamber on 3/16 at 4:16 PM but as quickly as it appears it when back down to 1 ppm. Levels of CO stayed at 1 ppm (the meter was sampling at 1 minute intervals) until about 8:20 PM on 3/16 but toggled between 0 and 1 ppm until after 9:41 PM when it returned to 0 ppm and remained at 0 ppm until the monitoring was completed on 3/18. We did not identify potential sources of CO in the Assembly Chambers but noted the boiler room is adjacent to it and shares a common wall at the NW corner. We did not identify penetrations in this area, however. As discussed above, the KIB Administration Building is adjacent to Mill Bay Road, and all of the ventilation units may pull in Outside Air with somewhat higher CO2 and CO levels. Low levels of CO were recorded in Office 226 on 3/16 with an average of 1 ppm of CO but the average was 0 ppm over the remaining monitoring period. The CO monitoring suggest low levels of CO were present on 3/16 in all areas but were not present on 3/17 and 3/18. The levels of CO during the whole monitoring period did not exceed or approach the regulatory limits. Levels of CO between 0-9 ppm should pose no health risk but low levels are a potential indication that vehicle exhaust from the Mill Bay Road is entering the building. 6.1.2 Airborne Particulates - “Dust” The OSHA PEL for “Dust” is 5 mg/m3 and the levels recorded in all three areas over the time period from March 16- 18, 2020 showed that “Dust” levels were thousands of times lower than the OSHA PEL. Although measurable amounts of airborne particulates (“dust”) were identified during the monitoring period in all three areas, the levels were well below the OSHA Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) for “particles not otherwise specified” and the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) which recommends that airborne concentrations be kept below 3 mg/m3 for “respirable” particles and below 10 mg/m3 “inhalable” particles, until a Threshold Limit Value (TLV) is established. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 102 of 219 Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building - 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 12 Conference Room – Lower Level “Dust” Levels March 16-18, 2020 Assemble Chambers “Dust” Levels March 16-18, 2020 Office 226 “Dust” Levels March 16-18, 2020 6.1.3 Volatile Organic Compounds Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) represent a large class of compounds, including alcohols, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX), with numerous sources such as paints, glues, gasoline vapors, cleaning compounds, and combustion products. Although not a comprehensive list, some of the signs and symptoms indicative of acute VOC exposure are nausea, vomiting, cough, pulmonary irritation, vertigo or dizziness, slow and shallow respiration, unconsciousness, coma, and convulsion. VOC air concentrations are typically higher indoors than outdoors, but typical indoor concentrations seldom exceed a fraction of a ppm. Permissible exposure limits (PELs) for VOCs varies depending on the compound. For example, the PEL for acetone is 1000 ppm whereas the PEL for benzene is 1 ppm. Other common solvents such as Toluene (200 ppm), Xylene (100 ppm) have PELs somewhere between acetone and benzene. Use of hand sanitizers is a common way for irritating levels of VOCs to be present in the office environment. Determining potential exposure to VOCs is not AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 103 of 219 Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building - 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 13 that straight forward unless you have identified the compounds likely to be present. We noted the presence of various hand sanitizers, cleaner and an assortment of other product in Office 226 (see figure 41) and monitoring results indicate low levels of VOCs were present, so we assume that they are contributing to the VOCs in the air. The results of the monitoring in both the Assemble Chamber and Conference Room – Lower Level indicate that VOCs were not at levels much above the detection limit of the meter and we did not include their graphical representation. Since VOCs comprise a large class of low molecular weight compounds, a more targeted study would be necessary to determine the presence and source of specific VOCs. However, occupants can become sensitized and experience discomfort even at levels well below regulatory limits. Office 226 VOCs Levels March 16-18, 2020 6.1.4 Temperature & Relative Humidity According to the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE), the indoor temperatures that are reported to satisfy most people (at least 80%) range from 68.5 to 75 ºF in the winter shown as a yellow shaded area in the graphs to 75 to 80.5 ºF in the summer. These temperature ranges are set for energy conservation measures, which allow cooler than “ideal” temperatures in the winter and warmer than “ideal” temperatures in the summer. Practically speaking, the most comfortable (optimum operative) indoor working temperatures are 71 ºF in the winter and 76 °F in the summer. ASHRAE 55 defines thermal comfort as “that condition of mind that expresses satisfaction with the thermal environment.” Office workers reported that they are often either too cold or too warm and it is difficult to satisfy all occupants. The use of portable heaters was noted in several offices however, they would not be necessary in a properly designed and operating HVAC system. The administration building was designed as a dormitory and it appears that the HVAC system has not undergone upgrades since it was converted to an office environment, so it is likely that dissatisfaction with the thermal environment is more than just a “condition of the mind.” Additionally, we noted a large number of windows with broken thermal panes and condensation, and the windows are probably past their useful life span. The Temperature and Relative Humidity graphs for the Conference Room – Lower Level, Assembly Chamber, and Office 226 for the periods in which they were monitored are shown below. The yellow shaded area is the ASHRAE recommended thermal comfort winter temperature range. The temperature trends in the Assembly Chambers generally fell out of the recommended temperature range but the Conference Room and Office 226 (which is not normally occupied) were generally within the ASHRAE recommended thermal comfort temperature range throughout the monitoring period. Given that fact that portable space heaters were present in many of the offices inspected, it is likely that occupants are experiencing thermal discomfort. When we interviewed occupants, their chief complaint was about thermal discomfort particularly during winter months. Although we did not monitor in the Borough Clerks office or the Building Permits office, the occupants also indicated that thermal discomfort was their main concern; they did not indicate that poor indoor air or respirable or mold was causing discomfort or health effects. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 104 of 219 Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building - 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 14 The humidity was below the maximum recommended level of 60% which is largely designed to reduce the likelihood of widespread microbial growth. Humidity levels are harder to control without humidification and Alaska is subject to low humidity during winter months. Conference Room – Lower Level: Temperature and Relative Humidity Levels March 16-18, 2020 Assembly Chamber: Temperature and Relative Humidity Levels March 16-18, 2020 Office Area 226: Temperature and Relative Humidity Levels March 16-18, 2020 7.0 RADON TESTING RESULTS Table 7 below summarizes the results of the radon testing in the locations indicated over the period March 16- 18, 2020. The tests were conducted under normally occupied conditions. The test results do not indicate that radon levels approached the EPA action level of 4.0 pCi/L. The full laboratory results and lab accreditation are included in Attachment B. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 105 of 219 Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building - 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 15 Table 7: Radon Testing Results March 16-18, 2020 Location Box Number Device Number Result (pCi/L) Office 101 234921 412660 0.3 Conference Room 231062 404563 404703 (dual) 0 0.3 Office 120 234920 412641 0.4 Office 115 234923 412558 0.0 Assembly Chamber 234922 412547 412566 (dual) 0.2 0.0 8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Address drainage, foundation waterproofing and grade issues resulting in water intrusion into the crawlspace. 2. Regrade the area around the sump pump located in the crawlspace of the 2-story, east half, near center of south side along interior foundation wall. The grade around the sump pump should slope towards the sump pump to better collect surface water. 3. Further investigate the moldy and musty odors noted in the closet storage room in office 108. Remove carpet and visually inspect stored items for visible suspect fungal growth. 4. The thermal discomfort concerns will hopefully be addressed as part of the mechanical upgrades project schedule for the summer of 2020. 5. Consider a complete window replacement project as part of an energy upgrade to include additional building envelope insulation (note that this may also disturb the Cement Asbestos Board insulated wall panels above and below the windows). 6. Seal the backsplash behind the sink in room 223. 7. Remove and replace the water stained wall covering around the fountain in the lower level hall. 8. Provide proper storage for cleaning products and proper labelling of unmarked containers. 9. Clean up the asbestos debris in the crawlspace and remove asbestos-contaminated soils. 10. Seal the crawlspace hatches with proper gaskets. 9.0 LIMITATIONS/STANDARD OF CARE EHS-Alaska, Inc. followed currently accepted industrial hygiene practices, including professional opinions based on observations documented onsite, and information relayed to EHS-Alaska from the client. The recommendations were derived in part from ASHRAE guidelines, OSHA PELs, and ACGIH TLVs and from ANSI/IICRC S520 Standard and Reference Guide for Professional Remediation; the "Assessment, Remediation, and Post-Remediation Verification of Mold in Buildings," published in 2004 by the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA), the New York City Department of Health “Guidelines on Assessment and Remediation of Fungi in Indoor Environments” updated in 2002 and “Bioaerosols: Assessment and Control”, by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH), published in 1999, American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) D7338-14 Standard Guide for Assessment of Fungal Growth in Buildings, and ASTM E2418-06 Standard Guide for Readily Observable Mold and Conditions Conducive to Mold in Commercial Buildings: Baseline Survey Process These guidelines are generally accepted as “industry standard” for microbial assessments and remediation protocols. Other than this, no warranty is implied or intended. The State of Alaska does not currently have laws or regulations which require radon testing and testing was voluntary. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 106 of 219 Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building - 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 16 The observations and conclusions provided in this assessment are valid only for the locations and dates indicated. EHS-Alaska, Inc. is not responsible for any action, legal or otherwise, or lack of action resulting from the conclusions and recommendations provided in this assessment. The findings we have presented within this report are based on limited research and on the visual inspection that was conducted at this site at the time and date specified. They should not be construed as a definite conclusion regarding the conditions or microbiological materials at this site. The observations presented in this assessment should be considered representative of the time of our site inspection. Changes in site conditions can occur with time, because of natural variations in airborne concentrations, seasonal variations, differing airflow patterns through the building, and human activity. Actual conditions in areas not inspected may differ from those in this report. The observations and conclusions provided in this assessment are valid only for the locations and dates indicated. EHS-Alaska, Inc. is not responsible for any action, legal or otherwise, or lack of action resulting from the conclusions and recommendations provided in this assessment. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 107 of 219 Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska ATTACHMENT A Key Figures AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 108 of 219 7765 KIB Administration Building Limited IAQ Assessment – KEY FIGURES Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building - 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 1 of 22 Figure 1: EHS-Alaska performed an Indoor Air Quality assessment of the Kodiak Island Borough Administration Building located at 710 Mill Bay Road in Kodiak, Alaska. The assessment included an outside inspection to identify signs and symptoms that have the potential to impact the indoor air quality. Figure 2: The grade around the 2-story (reference) north portion of the building, at the south side of the west half slopes towards the building and suggests surface and ground water has the potential to contribute to poor IAQ. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 109 of 219 7765 KIB Administration Building Limited IAQ Assessment – KEY FIGURES Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building - 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 2 of 22 Figure 3: The crawlspace along the potion of the building depicted in figure 2 was wet, most likely because the grade slopes toward the building. The vapor barrier was covered by crushed rock apparently brought in to raise the grade above the ground water level. Figure 4: The snow around the 2-story (reference) north portion of the building, at the south side of the east half exhibited characteristic signs of heat loss through the foundation and potential water ground water intrusion. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 110 of 219 7765 KIB Administration Building Limited IAQ Assessment – KEY FIGURES Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building - 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 3 of 22 Figure 5: The infrared image (see figure 4) also suggests heat loss through the foundation and potential water intrusion. Figure 6: The crawlspace appeared dry on the surface in the area depicted in figure 5, but the dirt at the sump pump located in the crawlspace of the 2-story, east half, near center of south side along interior foundation wall was wet. The grade around the sump pump should slope towards the sump pump to better collect surface water. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 111 of 219 7765 KIB Administration Building Limited IAQ Assessment – KEY FIGURES Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building - 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 4 of 22 Figure 7: There was standing water in the sump pump basin and the ground was wet. The sump pump did not “kick on” during the time spent in that area. Figure 8: The (reference) east side of the building exhibited signs that surface water and potentially ground water intrudes into the crawlspace. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 112 of 219 7765 KIB Administration Building Limited IAQ Assessment – KEY FIGURES Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building - 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 5 of 22 Figure 9: The area under the entrance at the north side (see figure 8) exhibited signs and symptoms of long-term chronic water intrusion resulting in deterioration of the metal decking which may be exacerbated by the use of salt on the sidewalk during winter months. Figure 10: The foundation in the area under the entrance at the north side (see figures 8 & 9) has efflorescence characteristic of water intrusion through the concrete. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 113 of 219 7765 KIB Administration Building Limited IAQ Assessment – KEY FIGURES Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building - 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 6 of 22 Figure 11: It appears that the grade along the parking lot on the west side slopes towards the building along the south end and the scupper above is contributing to the source of water noted in the crawlspace. Figure 12: The crawlspace in the area depicted in Figure 11 has standing water and obvious signs of water intrusion from ground water and surface water sources. Scupper AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 114 of 219 7765 KIB Administration Building Limited IAQ Assessment – KEY FIGURES Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building - 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 7 of 22 Figure 13: The sump pump in the SW portion of the crawlspace near the access hatch was not operational. Water marks on the foundation wall suggests the water levels fluctuate. Note the efflorescence on the wall supporting the supposition that ground water is coming through the foundation. Figure 14: There are signs that surface water runoff is undermining the sidewalk and landing at the south entry. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 115 of 219 7765 KIB Administration Building Limited IAQ Assessment – KEY FIGURES Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building - 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 8 of 22 Figure 15: The interior inspection started in the lower level and accessible areas were assessed for visual signs and symptoms of deteriorated conditions, staining, and odors which may contribute to poor indoor air. Figure 16: In general offices were clean, odor free, and lack accumulated dust and debris on surfaces not routinely cleaned. Minor staining around windows was noted on some windowsills from condensation or plant watering activities. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 116 of 219 7765 KIB Administration Building Limited IAQ Assessment – KEY FIGURES Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building - 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 9 of 22 Figure 17: Occupants from offices in the KIB and in the City of Kodiak suggested their greatest concern was centered around the heating/ventilation systems. Being too cold or too hot was the most common complaint. Figure 18: Moldy and musty odors were noted in the closet storage area in vacant office 108 in the loose carpet but there were no currently wet areas or signs of water intrusion on the walls and ceiling. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 117 of 219 7765 KIB Administration Building Limited IAQ Assessment – KEY FIGURES Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building - 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 10 of 22 Figure 19: “Pillbugs” were noted in several areas of the lower level and they require damp or moist conditions to live in, but they also are attracted to food particles suggesting cleaning may not be thorough. Figure 20: Some of the exhaust air louvers in the City of Kodiak side of the lower level exhibited signs of particulate matter build-up, but the occupants did not feel that elevated levels of airborne particulates is resulting in respiratory health issues when asked. We noted similar build-up on the KIB side too, but we did not characterize it as excessive. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 118 of 219 7765 KIB Administration Building Limited IAQ Assessment – KEY FIGURES Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building - 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 11 of 22 Figure 21: We inspected for excessive plants in office areas because they are frequently a source where fungi grow; and where noted, we asked the occupants if they had any complaints about poor indoor air and the chief complaint was actually about thermal discomfort Figure 22: Several portable heaters were noted throughout the building and thermal discomfort was the chief complaint among occupants in areas where they were found. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 119 of 219 7765 KIB Administration Building Limited IAQ Assessment – KEY FIGURES Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building - 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 12 of 22 Figure 23: We noted windows throughout the building with broken seals and condensation. Figure 24: We inspected windowsills and did not note suspect fungal growth; and although there was some water staining on the sills, most of it could be attributed to occupant activities such as watering plants. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 120 of 219 7765 KIB Administration Building Limited IAQ Assessment – KEY FIGURES Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building - 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 13 of 22 Figure 25: We examined areas around sinks for deterioration from water leaks and we looked for visible fungal growth. Figures 26 A-D: We noted unsealed backsplash behind the sink in room 223 and noted water intrusion could occur into the area behind it from water splashing and how the wet sponge is stored. But we did not note any visible suspect fungal growth or moldy and musty odors. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 121 of 219 7765 KIB Administration Building Limited IAQ Assessment – KEY FIGURES Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building - 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 14 of 22 Figure 27: We inspected areas under sinks for water leaks and did not observe signs and symptoms of chronic water leaks or deteriorated surfaces. Figure 28: In conference room 116 we noted debris in the air gap under the sink, but it was dry and really had no odor. We did not characterize it as fungal growth. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 122 of 219 7765 KIB Administration Building Limited IAQ Assessment – KEY FIGURES Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building - 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 15 of 22 Figure 29: We examined areas behind cove bases on exterior walls with sheetrock in the lower level, in particular where there is a concrete floor under the floor covering because we often find hidden mold in those areas, but we did not note any suspect fungal growth or moldy and musty odors. Figure 30: We inspected ceiling tiles for staining from water leaks and did not note any with staining suggestive of current or past water leaks. Some minor staining was noted around light fixtures, supply air louvers, and penetrations which was characterized as minor particulate matter. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 123 of 219 7765 KIB Administration Building Limited IAQ Assessment – KEY FIGURES Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building - 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 16 of 22 Figure 31: We noted under-insulated exterior walls with some “ghosting” on the walls. Figure 32: We noted lack of insulation or displaced insulation at electrical components in exterior walls (lower level borough conference room shown). Figure 33: We noted displaced or lack of insulation on the exterior wall of the assembly chambers. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 124 of 219 7765 KIB Administration Building Limited IAQ Assessment – KEY FIGURES Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building - 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 17 of 22 Figure 34: We noted temperature gradient lines in stairways along exterior walls (East lower level shown) conveying colder outside temperatures into the interior. Figure 35: We noted signs of past water intrusion on the NE exterior wall of the east stairway. The potential source of moisture could be from condensation due to under-insulated exterior wall or lack of detailing on the framing members. It was not currently wet, and we did not note suspect fungal growth or moldy and musty odors. Figure 36: We noted signs of water on the concrete floor in the fan room even though there is a floor drain near it. The (assumed) condensate drain lines should be plumbed to the drain. The area of the crawlspace under the fan room exhibited signs of chronic water intrusion from above. Assumed condensate drain lines AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 125 of 219 7765 KIB Administration Building Limited IAQ Assessment – KEY FIGURES Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building - 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 18 of 22 Figure 37: We noted minor entrapments accumulated along the top of fabric-covered walls in the lower level borough conference room which was attributed to building pressure differences. It was not excessive and there were no odors associated with it; it did not appear to be fungal growth. Figure 38: We noted staining around the lower level drinking fountain on the vinyl wall covering. It was currently dry and there was no suspect fungal growth or moldy or musty odors. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 126 of 219 7765 KIB Administration Building Limited IAQ Assessment – KEY FIGURES Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building - 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 19 of 22 Figure 39: We noted signs of a past water damage (loose floor tiles) around the toilet and sink area in the Building Permit office but there were no odors and it was currently dry and the occupant did not have any concerns of poor IAQ other than thermal discomfort during the winter with it being too hot or too cold. Figure 40: We did not note objectionable odors around the re-cycling bins and the empty bins were not characterized as being excessively dirty. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 127 of 219 7765 KIB Administration Building Limited IAQ Assessment – KEY FIGURES Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building - 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 20 of 22 Figure 41: Certainly, the concern of the coronavirus resulted in greater awareness for proper cleaning, but proper storage should also be included. Figure 42: Unmarked containers should be properly labelled. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 128 of 219 7765 KIB Administration Building Limited IAQ Assessment – KEY FIGURES Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building - 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 21 of 22 Figure 43: A potential airborne contaminant is asbestos. Physically damaged asbestos hard fittings, like this one in the lower level mechanical fan room, should be removed or repaired by certified abatement workers. Figure 44: Additionally, asbestos debris from damaged or discarded piping insulation in the crawlspace should be properly cleaned up. Asbestos debris was noted in several areas of the crawlspace. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 129 of 219 7765 KIB Administration Building Limited IAQ Assessment – KEY FIGURES Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building - 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 22 of 22 Figure 45: Water damaged asbestos insulation in the crawlspace should be cleaned up by properly trained certified workers and the contaminated soil removed and disposed at a landfill which accepts asbestos. Figure 46: The crawlspace hatches were secured with padlocks, but they are not airtight and external and internal pressures could result in air from the crawlspace moving into the occupied portions of the building. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 130 of 219 Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska ATTACHMENT B Laboratory Results & Laboratory Accreditation AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 131 of 219 Approved by: Operations Manager Joshua Cox Report for: Mr. Martin Schwan EHS-Alaska, Inc. 11901 Business Blvd, Suite 208 Eagle River, AK 99577 Regarding:Project: 7765-Kodiak KIB Fungal Assessment; Limited Mold Assessment EML ID: 2379245 All samples were received in acceptable condition unless noted in the Report Comments portion in the body of the report. Due to the nature of the analyses performed, field blank correction of results is not applied. The results relate only to the samples as received. Sample air volume is supplied by the client. Eurofins EMLab P&K ("the Company") shall have no liability to the client or the client's customer with respect to decisions or recommendations made, actions taken or courses of conduct implemented by either the client or the client's customer as a result of or based upon the Test Results. In no event shall the Company be liable to the client with respect to the Test Results except for the Company's own willful misconduct or gross negligence nor shall the Company be liable for incidental or consequential damages or lost profits or revenues to the fullest extent such liability may be disclaimed by law, even if the Company has been advised of the possibility of such damages, lost profits or lost revenues. In no event shall the Company's liability with respect to the Test Results exceed the amount paid to the Company by the client therefor. Dates of Analysis: Spore trap analysis: 03-20-2020 Service SOPs: Spore trap analysis (EM-MY-S-1038) AIHA-LAP, LLC accredited service, Lab ID #102297 Eurofins EMLab P&K's LabServe® reporting system includes automated fail-safes to ensure that all AIHA-LAP, LLC quality requirements are met and notifications are added to reports when any quality steps remain pending. EMLab ID: 2379245, Page 1 of 3Aerotech Laboratories, Inc AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 132 of 219 Eurofins EMLab P&K 1501 West Knudsen Drive, Phoenix, AZ 85027 (800) 651-4802 Fax (623) 780-7695 www.emlab.comClient: EHS-Alaska, Inc. C/O: Mr. Martin Schwan Re: 7765-Kodiak KIB Fungal Assessment; Limited Mold Assessment Date of Sampling: 03-16-2020 Date of Receipt: 03-20-2020 Date of Report: 03-20-2020 SPORE TRAP REPORT: NON-VIABLE METHODOLOGY Location:A01: Office 108 A02: Office 115 A03: Lower Level Conference Room A04: Office 101 Comments (see below)None None None None Lab ID-Version‡:11345867-1 11345868-1 11345869-1 11345870-1 Analysis Date:03/20/2020 03/20/2020 03/20/2020 03/20/2020 raw ct.spores/m3 raw ct.spores/m3 raw ct.spores/m3 raw ct.spores/m3 Ascospores 1 53 2 110 1 13 Basidiospores 1 53 1 13 1 13 Chaetomium Cladosporium Curvularia Epicoccum Fusarium Myrothecium Nigrospora Other colorless Penicillium/Aspergillus types†2 110 Pithomyces Rusts Smuts, Periconia, Myxomycetes 1 13 Stachybotrys Stemphylium Torula Ulocladium Zygomycetes Background debris (1-4+)††3+3+3+3+ Hyphal fragments/m3 27 13 < 13 < 13 Pollen/m3 < 13 13 < 13 < 13 Skin cells (1-4+)1+1+1+1+ Sample volume (liters)74.94 75.09 75.2 75.23 § TOTAL SPORES/m3 230 110 13 27 Comments: EMLab ID: 2379245, Page 2 of 3Aerotech Laboratories, Inc Spore types listed without a count or data entry were not detected during the course of the analysis for the respective sample, indicating a raw count of <1 spore. † The spores of Aspergillus and Penicillium (and others such as Acremonium, Paecilomyces) are small and round with very few distinguishing characteristics. They cannot be differentiated by non-viable sampling methods. Also, some species with very small spores are easily missed, and may be undercounted. ††Background debris indicates the amount of non-biological particulate matter present on the trace (dust in the air) and the resulting visibility for the analyst. It is rated from 1+ (low) to 4+ (high). Counts from areas with 4+ background debris should be regarded as minimal counts and may be higher than reported. It is important to account for samples volumes when evaluating dust levels. The analytical sensitivity is the spores/m^3 divided by the raw count, expressed in spores/m^3. The limit of detection is the analytical sensitivity (in spores/m^3) multiplied by the sample volume (in liters) divided by 1000 liters. For more information regarding analytical sensitivity, please contact QA by calling the laboratory. ‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x". § Total Spores/m3 has been rounded to two significant figures to reflect analytical precision. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 133 of 219 Eurofins EMLab P&K 1501 West Knudsen Drive, Phoenix, AZ 85027 (800) 651-4802 Fax (623) 780-7695 www.emlab.comClient: EHS-Alaska, Inc. C/O: Mr. Martin Schwan Re: 7765-Kodiak KIB Fungal Assessment; Limited Mold Assessment Date of Sampling: 03-16-2020 Date of Receipt: 03-20-2020 Date of Report: 03-20-2020 SPORE TRAP REPORT: NON-VIABLE METHODOLOGY Location:A05: Assembly Chambers A06: Office in 223 A07: Office 226 Comments (see below)None None None Lab ID-Version‡:11345871-1 11345872-1 11345873-1 Analysis Date:03/20/2020 03/20/2020 03/20/2020 raw ct.spores/m3 raw ct.spores/m3 raw ct.spores/m3 Ascospores 2 27 3 40 Basidiospores 1 13 2 110 2 27 Botrytis Chaetomium Cladosporium 1 13 1 53 1 13 Curvularia Epicoccum Fusarium Myrothecium Nigrospora Other colorless Penicillium/Aspergillus types† Pithomyces Rusts Smuts, Periconia, Myxomycetes 1 13 Stachybotrys Stemphylium Torula Ulocladium Zygomycetes Background debris (1-4+)††3+3+3+ Hyphal fragments/m3 < 13 < 13 13 Pollen/m3 < 13 < 13 < 13 Skin cells (1-4+)1+1+1+ Sample volume (liters)75.34 75.01 75.12 § TOTAL SPORES/m3 53 160 93 Comments: EMLab ID: 2379245, Page 3 of 3Aerotech Laboratories, Inc Spore types listed without a count or data entry were not detected during the course of the analysis for the respective sample, indicating a raw count of <1 spore. † The spores of Aspergillus and Penicillium (and others such as Acremonium, Paecilomyces) are small and round with very few distinguishing characteristics. They cannot be differentiated by non-viable sampling methods. Also, some species with very small spores are easily missed, and may be undercounted. ††Background debris indicates the amount of non-biological particulate matter present on the trace (dust in the air) and the resulting visibility for the analyst. It is rated from 1+ (low) to 4+ (high). Counts from areas with 4+ background debris should be regarded as minimal counts and may be higher than reported. It is important to account for samples volumes when evaluating dust levels. The analytical sensitivity is the spores/m^3 divided by the raw count, expressed in spores/m^3. The limit of detection is the analytical sensitivity (in spores/m^3) multiplied by the sample volume (in liters) divided by 1000 liters. For more information regarding analytical sensitivity, please contact QA by calling the laboratory. ‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x". § Total Spores/m3 has been rounded to two significant figures to reflect analytical precision. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 134 of 219 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 135 of 219 Approved by: Operations Manager Joshua Cox Report for: Mr. Martin Schwan EHS-Alaska, Inc. 11901 Business Blvd, Suite 208 Eagle River, AK 99577 Regarding:Project: 7765-Kodiak KIB Fungal Assessment; Carpet Trapping Characterization EML ID: 2379357 All samples were received in acceptable condition unless noted in the Report Comments portion in the body of the report. Due to the nature of the analyses performed, field blank correction of results is not applied. The results relate only to the samples as received. Eurofins EMLab P&K ("the Company") shall have no liability to the client or the client's customer with respect to decisions or recommendations made, actions taken or courses of conduct implemented by either the client or the client's customer as a result of or based upon the Test Results. In no event shall the Company be liable to the client with respect to the Test Results except for the Company's own willful misconduct or gross negligence nor shall the Company be liable for incidental or consequential damages or lost profits or revenues to the fullest extent such liability may be disclaimed by law, even if the Company has been advised of the possibility of such damages, lost profits or lost revenues. In no event shall the Company's liability with respect to the Test Results exceed the amount paid to the Company by the client therefor. Dates of Analysis: Dust characterization: 03-21-2020 Service SOPs: Dust characterization (EM-MY-S-1044) EMLab ID: 2379357, Page 1 of 2Aerotech Laboratories, Inc AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 136 of 219 Eurofins EMLab P&K 1501 West Knudsen Drive, Phoenix, AZ 85027 (800) 651-4802 Fax (623) 780-7695 www.emlab.comClient: EHS-Alaska, Inc. C/O: Mr. Martin Schwan Re: 7765-Kodiak KIB Fungal Assessment; Carpet Trapping Characterization Date of Sampling: 03-16-2020 Date of Receipt: 03-20-2020 Date of Report: 03-23-2020 PARTICULATE CHARACTERIZATION - DIRECT MICROSCOPIC EXAMINATION REPORT Location:KIB2003-C01: Office 108 KIB2003-C02: Office 115 KIB2003-C03: Lower Level Conference Room KIB2003-C04: Assembly Chambers KIB2003-C05: Office 226 Comments (see below)None None None None None Lab ID-Version‡:11347903-1 11347904-1 11347905-1 11347906-1 11347907-1 Percentage (%)†Percentage (%)†Percentage (%)†Percentage (%)†Percentage (%)† Algae Amorphous debris 6 20 23 15 15 Animal hair 3 2 Cellulose fibers 35 40 40 45 40 Cotton fibers 1 Crystalline particles Epithelial (skin) cells 25 25 20 15 18 Feather barbs 1 Fern, moss, etc. Foam particles 1 Fungal spores 1 1 1 1 1 Glass fiber 1 2 1 1 Gypsum dust 7 5 5 Human hair 10 7 5 5 5 Hyphal fragments 1 1 1 1 Insect parts 1 Metal 3 1 Mites Other (wood, trichome, etc.)2 2 2 Paint-like particles 1 1 3 3 5 Pollen 2 1 1 1 Starch particles Synthetic fibers 5 1 5 3 3 Wood chips 1 Comments: EMLab ID: 2379357, Page 2 of 2Aerotech Laboratories, Inc † The percentages reported are approximate values. Reported percentages for each identifier are visual estimates of surface area occupied relative to the surface area of all other debris components in the sample preparation. For example, if the sample preparation only contains Epithelial (skin) cells and Fungal spores and both of these debris components occupy approximately the same total surface area relative to each other, the reported percentage for Epithelial (skin) cells would be 50% and the reported percentage for Fungal spores would be 50%. The limit of detection is 1%. Particle types listed without a percentage or data entry were not detected during the course of the analysis for the respective sample. Interpretation is left to the company and/or persons who conducted the field work. ‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x". AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 137 of 219 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 138 of 219 EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Tel/Fax:(800) 220-3675 / (856) 786-0327 http://www.EMSL.com / cinnaminsonradonlab@emsl.com EMSL Order:382002820 Customer ID:ENVI04 Customer PO: Project ID: (907) 694-1383Phone:Martin SchwanAttention: EHS Alaska, Inc.Fax:(907) 694-1382 11901 Business Blvd.Received Date:03/23/2020 12:34 PM Suite 208 Analysis Date:03/23/2020 Eagle River, AK 99577-7701 Project:7765 KIB Mechanical Upgrades & IAQ / 710 Mill Bay Road 7765 KIB Mechanical Upgrades & IAQ 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, AK 99615 Test Site: Test Report: Radon in Air Test Results Samples for EMSL Kit 231062 Temperature F Radon Activity pCi/L Humidity %Sample TypeStopStartLocationLiquid Scintillation 404563 382002820-0002 Conference Room 0.0 3/16/2020 3:02:00 pm 8:55:00 am 3/18/2020 Customer6810 Sample Notes: 404703 382002820-0003 Conference Room 0.3 3/16/2020 3:02:00 pm 8:55:00 am 3/18/2020 Customer6810 Sample Notes: The results indicate that both testing devices registered below the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) action level of 4.0 picoCuries per liter of air (pCi/L). The EPA recommends fixing your home if the average of two short-term tests taken in the lowest lived-in level of the home show radon levels that are equal to or greater than 4.0pCi/L. The radon test was performed using a liquid scintillation radon detector/s and counted on a liquid scintillation counter using approved EPA testing protocols for Radon in Air testing. The EPA recommends retesting your home every two years. Summary for EMSL Kit 231062 Average Radon Result: 0.2 pCi/L Please contact EMSL Analytical, Inc. or your State Health Department for further information. All procedures used for generating this report are in complete accordance with the current EPA protocols for the analysis of Radon in Air. This test was performed using EPA device protocol EPA-402-R-92-004. In no event shall EMSL be liable for indirect, special, consequential, or incidental damages, including, but not limited to, damages for loss of profit or goodwill regardless of the negligence (either sole or concurrent) of EMSL and whether EMSL has been informed of the possibility of such damages, arising out of or in connection with EMSL’s services thereunder or the delivery, use, reliance upon or interpretation of test results by client or any third party. We accept no legal responsibility for the purposes for which the client uses the test results. In no event shall EMSL be liable to a client or any third party, whether based upon theories of tort, contract or any other legal or equitable theory, in excess of the amount paid to EMSL by client thereunder. The test results meets all NELAC requirements unless otherwise specified. Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ FL RB2034/R2687,IL RNL2008202,IN RTL00935,IA RNLAB10005,KS KS-LB-0005/KS-MS-0482,ME SPC202,MN RL-0005,NE 474/RMB-1083,NJ 03036/MEB92525/MES13910,NY 10872,OH RL39,OK D9952,PA 2573/3393/68-00367,RI RMB-108/RI00179,WV RL000220,NRSB-ARL6006,NRPP 109000-AL. Analyst(s): Dominic Gehret Radon (7)Dominic Gehret, Radiochemistry Laboratory Manager, NJ Radon Measurement Specialist MES 13910 or other approved signatory Initial report from: 03/25/2020 12:30:57 Page 1 of 5RAD_SMK_0001 Printed 3/25/2020 12:30:58PM Please visit www.radontestinglab.com AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 139 of 219 EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Tel/Fax:(800) 220-3675 / (856) 786-0327 http://www.EMSL.com / cinnaminsonradonlab@emsl.com EMSL Order:382002820 Customer ID:ENVI04 Customer PO: Project ID: (907) 694-1383Phone:Martin SchwanAttention: EHS Alaska, Inc.Fax:(907) 694-1382 11901 Business Blvd.Received Date:03/23/2020 12:34 PM Suite 208 Analysis Date:03/23/2020 Eagle River, AK 99577-7701 Project:7765 KIB Mechanical Upgrades & IAQ / 710 Mill Bay Road 7765 KIB Mechanical Upgrades & IAQ 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, AK 99615 Test Site: Test Report: Radon in Air Test Results Samples for EMSL Kit 234920 Temperature F Radon Activity pCi/L Humidity %Sample TypeStopStartLocationLiquid Scintillation 412641 382002820-0004 Room 120 0.4 3/16/2020 2:59:00 pm 8:58:00 am 3/18/2020 Customer7230 Sample Notes: The result indicates that the test device registered at or below the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) action level of 4.0 picoCuries per liter of air (pCi/L). The EPA recommends fixing your home if the average of two short-term tests taken in the lowest lived-in level of the home show radon levels that are equal to or greater than 4.0pCi/L. The radon test was performed using a liquid scintillation radon detector/s and counted on a liquid scintillation counter using approved EPA testing protocols for Radon in Air testing. The EPA recommends retesting your home every two years. Please contact EMSL Analytical, Inc. or your State Health Department for further information. All procedures used for generating this report are in complete accordance with the current EPA protocols for the analysis of Radon in Air. This test was performed using EPA device protocol EPA-402-R-92-004. In no event shall EMSL be liable for indirect, special, consequential, or incidental damages, including, but not limited to, damages for loss of profit or goodwill regardless of the negligence (either sole or concurrent) of EMSL and whether EMSL has been informed of the possibility of such damages, arising out of or in connection with EMSL’s services thereunder or the delivery, use, reliance upon or interpretation of test results by client or any third party. We accept no legal responsibility for the purposes for which the client uses the test results. In no event shall EMSL be liable to a client or any third party, whether based upon theories of tort, contract or any other legal or equitable theory, in excess of the amount paid to EMSL by client thereunder. The test results meets all NELAC requirements unless otherwise specified. Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ FL RB2034/R2687,IL RNL2008202,IN RTL00935,IA RNLAB10005,KS KS-LB-0005/KS-MS-0482,ME SPC202,MN RL-0005,NE 474/RMB-1083,NJ 03036/MEB92525/MES13910,NY 10872,OH RL39,OK D9952,PA 2573/3393/68-00367,RI RMB-108/RI00179,WV RL000220,NRSB-ARL6006,NRPP 109000-AL. Analyst(s): Dominic Gehret Radon (7)Dominic Gehret, Radiochemistry Laboratory Manager, NJ Radon Measurement Specialist MES 13910 or other approved signatory Initial report from: 03/25/2020 12:30:57 Page 2 of 5RAD_SMK_0001 Printed 3/25/2020 12:30:58PM Please visit www.radontestinglab.com AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 140 of 219 EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Tel/Fax:(800) 220-3675 / (856) 786-0327 http://www.EMSL.com / cinnaminsonradonlab@emsl.com EMSL Order:382002820 Customer ID:ENVI04 Customer PO: Project ID: (907) 694-1383Phone:Martin SchwanAttention: EHS Alaska, Inc.Fax:(907) 694-1382 11901 Business Blvd.Received Date:03/23/2020 12:34 PM Suite 208 Analysis Date:03/23/2020 Eagle River, AK 99577-7701 Project:7765 KIB Mechanical Upgrades & IAQ / 710 Mill Bay Road 7765 KIB Mechanical Upgrades & IAQ 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, AK 99615 Test Site: Test Report: Radon in Air Test Results Samples for EMSL Kit 234921 Temperature F Radon Activity pCi/L Humidity %Sample TypeStopStartLocationLiquid Scintillation 412660 382002820-0001 Room 101 0.3 3/16/2020 3:00:00 pm 8:52:00 am 3/18/2020 Customer7230 Sample Notes: The result indicates that the test device registered at or below the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) action level of 4.0 picoCuries per liter of air (pCi/L). The EPA recommends fixing your home if the average of two short-term tests taken in the lowest lived-in level of the home show radon levels that are equal to or greater than 4.0pCi/L. The radon test was performed using a liquid scintillation radon detector/s and counted on a liquid scintillation counter using approved EPA testing protocols for Radon in Air testing. The EPA recommends retesting your home every two years. Please contact EMSL Analytical, Inc. or your State Health Department for further information. All procedures used for generating this report are in complete accordance with the current EPA protocols for the analysis of Radon in Air. This test was performed using EPA device protocol EPA-402-R-92-004. In no event shall EMSL be liable for indirect, special, consequential, or incidental damages, including, but not limited to, damages for loss of profit or goodwill regardless of the negligence (either sole or concurrent) of EMSL and whether EMSL has been informed of the possibility of such damages, arising out of or in connection with EMSL’s services thereunder or the delivery, use, reliance upon or interpretation of test results by client or any third party. We accept no legal responsibility for the purposes for which the client uses the test results. In no event shall EMSL be liable to a client or any third party, whether based upon theories of tort, contract or any other legal or equitable theory, in excess of the amount paid to EMSL by client thereunder. The test results meets all NELAC requirements unless otherwise specified. Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ FL RB2034/R2687,IL RNL2008202,IN RTL00935,IA RNLAB10005,KS KS-LB-0005/KS-MS-0482,ME SPC202,MN RL-0005,NE 474/RMB-1083,NJ 03036/MEB92525/MES13910,NY 10872,OH RL39,OK D9952,PA 2573/3393/68-00367,RI RMB-108/RI00179,WV RL000220,NRSB-ARL6006,NRPP 109000-AL. Analyst(s): Dominic Gehret Radon (7)Dominic Gehret, Radiochemistry Laboratory Manager, NJ Radon Measurement Specialist MES 13910 or other approved signatory Initial report from: 03/25/2020 12:30:57 Page 3 of 5RAD_SMK_0001 Printed 3/25/2020 12:30:58PM Please visit www.radontestinglab.com AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 141 of 219 EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Tel/Fax:(800) 220-3675 / (856) 786-0327 http://www.EMSL.com / cinnaminsonradonlab@emsl.com EMSL Order:382002820 Customer ID:ENVI04 Customer PO: Project ID: (907) 694-1383Phone:Martin SchwanAttention: EHS Alaska, Inc.Fax:(907) 694-1382 11901 Business Blvd.Received Date:03/23/2020 12:34 PM Suite 208 Analysis Date:03/23/2020 Eagle River, AK 99577-7701 Project:7765 KIB Mechanical Upgrades & IAQ / 710 Mill Bay Road 7765 KIB Mechanical Upgrades & IAQ 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, AK 99615 Test Site: Test Report: Radon in Air Test Results Samples for EMSL Kit 234922 Temperature F Radon Activity pCi/L Humidity %Sample TypeStopStartLocationLiquid Scintillation 412547 382002820-0006 Assembly Chamber 0.2 3/16/2020 3:08:00 pm 9:05:00 am 3/18/2020 Customer7230 Sample Notes: 412566 382002820-0007 Assembly Chamber 0.0 3/16/2020 3:08:00 pm 9:05:00 am 3/18/2020 Customer7230 Sample Notes: The results indicate that both testing devices registered below the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) action level of 4.0 picoCuries per liter of air (pCi/L). The EPA recommends fixing your home if the average of two short-term tests taken in the lowest lived-in level of the home show radon levels that are equal to or greater than 4.0pCi/L. The radon test was performed using a liquid scintillation radon detector/s and counted on a liquid scintillation counter using approved EPA testing protocols for Radon in Air testing. The EPA recommends retesting your home every two years. Summary for EMSL Kit 234922 Average Radon Result: 0.1 pCi/L Please contact EMSL Analytical, Inc. or your State Health Department for further information. All procedures used for generating this report are in complete accordance with the current EPA protocols for the analysis of Radon in Air. This test was performed using EPA device protocol EPA-402-R-92-004. In no event shall EMSL be liable for indirect, special, consequential, or incidental damages, including, but not limited to, damages for loss of profit or goodwill regardless of the negligence (either sole or concurrent) of EMSL and whether EMSL has been informed of the possibility of such damages, arising out of or in connection with EMSL’s services thereunder or the delivery, use, reliance upon or interpretation of test results by client or any third party. We accept no legal responsibility for the purposes for which the client uses the test results. In no event shall EMSL be liable to a client or any third party, whether based upon theories of tort, contract or any other legal or equitable theory, in excess of the amount paid to EMSL by client thereunder. The test results meets all NELAC requirements unless otherwise specified. Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ FL RB2034/R2687,IL RNL2008202,IN RTL00935,IA RNLAB10005,KS KS-LB-0005/KS-MS-0482,ME SPC202,MN RL-0005,NE 474/RMB-1083,NJ 03036/MEB92525/MES13910,NY 10872,OH RL39,OK D9952,PA 2573/3393/68-00367,RI RMB-108/RI00179,WV RL000220,NRSB-ARL6006,NRPP 109000-AL. Analyst(s): Dominic Gehret Radon (7)Dominic Gehret, Radiochemistry Laboratory Manager, NJ Radon Measurement Specialist MES 13910 or other approved signatory Initial report from: 03/25/2020 12:30:57 Page 4 of 5RAD_SMK_0001 Printed 3/25/2020 12:30:58PM Please visit www.radontestinglab.com AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 142 of 219 EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Tel/Fax:(800) 220-3675 / (856) 786-0327 http://www.EMSL.com / cinnaminsonradonlab@emsl.com EMSL Order:382002820 Customer ID:ENVI04 Customer PO: Project ID: (907) 694-1383Phone:Martin SchwanAttention: EHS Alaska, Inc.Fax:(907) 694-1382 11901 Business Blvd.Received Date:03/23/2020 12:34 PM Suite 208 Analysis Date:03/23/2020 Eagle River, AK 99577-7701 Project:7765 KIB Mechanical Upgrades & IAQ / 710 Mill Bay Road 7765 KIB Mechanical Upgrades & IAQ 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, AK 99615 Test Site: Test Report: Radon in Air Test Results Samples for EMSL Kit 234923 Temperature F Radon Activity pCi/L Humidity %Sample TypeStopStartLocationLiquid Scintillation 412558 382002820-0005 Room 115 0.0 3/16/2020 2:56:00 pm 8:59:00 am 3/18/2020 Customer7230 Sample Notes: The result indicates that the test device registered at or below the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) action level of 4.0 picoCuries per liter of air (pCi/L). The EPA recommends fixing your home if the average of two short-term tests taken in the lowest lived-in level of the home show radon levels that are equal to or greater than 4.0pCi/L. The radon test was performed using a liquid scintillation radon detector/s and counted on a liquid scintillation counter using approved EPA testing protocols for Radon in Air testing. The EPA recommends retesting your home every two years. Please contact EMSL Analytical, Inc. or your State Health Department for further information. All procedures used for generating this report are in complete accordance with the current EPA protocols for the analysis of Radon in Air. This test was performed using EPA device protocol EPA-402-R-92-004. Report Notes: In no event shall EMSL be liable for indirect, special, consequential, or incidental damages, including, but not limited to, damages for loss of profit or goodwill regardless of the negligence (either sole or concurrent) of EMSL and whether EMSL has been informed of the possibility of such damages, arising out of or in connection with EMSL’s services thereunder or the delivery, use, reliance upon or interpretation of test results by client or any third party. We accept no legal responsibility for the purposes for which the client uses the test results. In no event shall EMSL be liable to a client or any third party, whether based upon theories of tort, contract or any other legal or equitable theory, in excess of the amount paid to EMSL by client thereunder. The test results meets all NELAC requirements unless otherwise specified. Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ FL RB2034/R2687,IL RNL2008202,IN RTL00935,IA RNLAB10005,KS KS-LB-0005/KS-MS-0482,ME SPC202,MN RL-0005,NE 474/RMB-1083,NJ 03036/MEB92525/MES13910,NY 10872,OH RL39,OK D9952,PA 2573/3393/68-00367,RI RMB-108/RI00179,WV RL000220,NRSB-ARL6006,NRPP 109000-AL. Analyst(s): Dominic Gehret Radon (7)Dominic Gehret, Radiochemistry Laboratory Manager, NJ Radon Measurement Specialist MES 13910 or other approved signatory Initial report from: 03/25/2020 12:30:57 Page 5 of 5RAD_SMK_0001 Printed 3/25/2020 12:30:58PM Please visit www.radontestinglab.com AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 143 of 219 OrderID: 382002820 Page 1 Of 1 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 144 of 219 AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs, LLC acknowledges that Eurofins EMLab P&K 1501 West Knudsen Drive, Phoenix, AZ 85027 Laboratory ID: 102297 along with all premises from which key activities are performed, as listed above, has fulfilled the requirements of the AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs (AIHA-LAP), LLC accreditation to the ISO/IEC 17025:2005 international standard, General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories in the following: LABORATORY ACCREDITATION PROGRAMS INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE Accreditation Expires: May 01, 2020 ENVIRONMENTAL LEAD Accreditation Expires: ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY Accreditation Expires: May 01, 2020 FOOD Accreditation Expires: UNIQUE SCOPES Accreditation Expires: Specific Field(s) of Testing (FoT)/Method(s) within each Accreditation Program for which the above named laboratory maintains accreditation is outlined on the attached Scope of Accreditation. Continued accreditation is contingent upon successful on-going compliance with ISO/IEC 17025:2005 and AIHA-LAP, LLC requirements. This certificate is not valid without the attached Scope of Accreditation. Please review the AIHA-LAP, LLC website (www.aihaaccreditedlabs.org) for the most current Scope. Elizabeth Bair Chairperson, Analytical Accreditation Board Cheryl O. Morton Managing Director, AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs, LLC Revision 17 – 09/11/2018 Date Issued: 08/22/2019 AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 145 of 219 Effective: 04/10/2015 102297_Scope_IHLAP_2019_08_22.docx Page 1 of 1 AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs, LLC SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION Eurofins EMLab P&K Laboratory ID: 102297 1501 West Knudsen Drive, Phoenix, AZ 85027 Issue Date: 08/22/2019 The laboratory is approved for those specific field(s) of testing/methods listed in the table below. Clients are urged to ve rify the laboratory’s current accreditation status for the particular field(s) of testing/Methods, since these can change due to proficiency status, suspension and/or withdrawal of accreditation. Industrial Hygiene Laboratory Accreditation Program (IHLAP) Initial Accreditation Date: 06/01/2014 IHLAP Scope Category Field of Testing (FoT) (FoTs cover all relevant IH matrices) Technology sub-type/ Detector Published Reference Method/Title of In- house Method Method Description or Analyte (for internal methods only) Asbestos/Fiber Microscopy Core Phase Contrast Microscopy (PCM) NIOSH 7400 A complete listing of currently accredited Industrial Hygiene laboratories is available on the AIHA -LAP, LLC website at: http://www.aihaaccreditedlabs.org AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 146 of 219 Effective: 03/12/2013 102297_Scope_EMLAP_2019_08_22.docx Page 1 of 2 AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs, LLC SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION Eurofins EMLab P&K Laboratory ID: 102297 1501 West Knudsen Drive, Phoenix, AZ 85027 Issue Date: 08/22/2019 The laboratory is approved for those specific field(s) of testing/methods listed in the table below. Clients are urged to ve rify the laboratory’s current accreditation status for the particular field(s) of testing/Methods, since these can change due to proficiency status, suspension and/or withdrawal of accreditation. Environmental Microbiology Laboratory Accreditation Program (EMLAP) Initial Accreditation Date: 12/01/2001 EMLAP Category Field of Testing (FoT) Method Method Description (for internal methods only) Fungal Air - Culturable EM-MY-S-1043 Preparation and Analysis of Air Samples for Culturable Fungi Bulk - Culturable EM-PR-S-1040 Preparation of Bulk, Dust/Soil, Swab/Wipe and Water/Liquid Samples for Quantitative Fungal and/or Bacterial Analysis EM-MY-S-2584 Analysis of Dust, Swab, Water and Bulk Samples for Culturable Fungi Surface - Culturable EM-PR-S-1040 Preparation of Bulk, Dust/Soil, Swab/Wipe and Water/Liquid Samples for Quantitative Fungal and/or Bacterial Analysis EM-MY-S-2584 Analysis of Dust, Swab, Water and Bulk Samples for Culturable Fungi Air - Direct Examination EM-MY-S-1038 Preparation and Analysis of Spore Trap (Air) Samples for Fungal Spores, Other Biological and Non-Biological Particles Bulk - Direct Examination EM-MY-S-1039 Preparation and Analysis of Tape, Swab, Wipe, Bulk and Dust-Soil Samples for Qualitative Direct Microscopic Exam EM-MY-S-1041 Preparation and Analysis of Tape, Swab, Wipe, Bulk and Dust-Soil Samples for Quantitative Direct Microscopic Exam Surface - Direct Examination EM-MY-S-1039 Preparation and Analysis of Tape, Swab, Wipe, Bulk and Dust-Soil Samples for Qualitative Direct Microscopic Exam EM-MY-S-1041 Preparation and Analysis of Tape, Swab, Wipe, Bulk and Dust-Soil Samples for Quantitative Direct Microscopic Exam AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 147 of 219 Effective: 03/12/2013 102297_Scope_EMLAP_2019_08_22.docx Page 2 of 2 EMLAP Category Field of Testing (FoT) Method Method Description (for internal methods only) Bacterial Air - Culturable EM-BT-S-1051 Enumeration and Gram Stain Identification of Aerobic Bacteria in Air Bulk - Culturable EM-BT-S-1050 Enumeration and Gram Stain Identification of Aerobic Bacteria and Thermophilic Actinomycetes in Contact Plates, Swab, Bulk, CarpetChek and Water Samples EM-PR-S-1040 Preparation of Bulk, Dust/Soil, Swab/Wipe and Water/Liquid Samples for Quantitative Fungal and/or Bacterial Analysis Surface - Culturable EM-BT-S-1050 Enumeration and Gram Stain Identification of Aerobic Bacteria and Thermophilic Actinomycetes in Contact Plates, Swab, Bulk, CarpetChek and Water Samples EM-PR-S-1040 Preparation of Bulk, Dust/Soil, Swab/Wipe and Water/Liquid Samples for Quantitative Fungal and/or Bacterial Analysis Legionella EM-BT-S-1045 ISO 11731 EM-BT-S-1687 Detection and Enumeration of Legionella bacteria (based on CDC method) A complete listing of currently accredited Environmental Microbiology laboratories is available on the AIHA-LAP, LLC website at: http://www.aihaaccreditedlabs.org AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 148 of 219 Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska ATTACHMENT C Sample Location Sketches AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 149 of 219 UPOffice101Office102Office103Office104Office105Office106Fan100XKitchen107Office108Office109Office110Office111Office112Office113Office114Office115Office116Office117Office118Office119Office120Conference121Office122Office123Office124Office125Office126Room122AWomen100ZMen100YTelephone107AStair100AHall100CStair100EStair100FStorage100WCRAWLSPACEA2031JensenInc.REVISIONSSHEET TITLEDATE:FILE:YorbaWall522 West 10th SteetJuneau, Alaska 99801jensenyorbawall.com907.586.1070AECC1374/14/2020 7:17:26 AM G:\_Projects\19019\CAD\SD\Arch\19019 KIB Borough BLDG - SD R19.rvtApril 13, 2020A201Kodiak Island BoroughBorough BuildingMechanical Upgrade19019Borough Building -1st Floor PlanExisting1Borough Building - 1st Floor PlanSCALE:016'8'4'IAQ SAMPLE LOCATION SKETCH1RWHV 1) Drawing not to scale. 2) Floor plan is not accurate (see Office 108& 109 for example.) 3) A0X = Airborne mold sample 4) C0X = Carpet Dust Sample 5) Radon XXXXXX = radon test box numner$&$&$&$(90,$4RADON - 234921RADON - 231062RADON - 234920RADON 234923AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 150 of 219 DNDNDNOffice201Office202Office203Office204Office206Office207Office208Office209Office210Office211Office213Office214Office215Office216Office217Office218Office219Office220Office221Office222Women200ZMen200YOffice223Office224Office225Office226Office227Office228Office230Office230AOffice230BIT240Office240AStorage241Office231Office231AOffice231BStorage231CAssemblyChambers232Office233Office234Storage235Office234AOffice234BOffice233ARR200WRR200XStorage241ABoiler242Stair200AHall200BHall200CHall200DStair200EStair200FHall200GOpen to BelowA2032JensenInc.REVISIONSSHEET TITLEDATE:FILE:YorbaWall522 West 10th SteetJuneau, Alaska 99801jensenyorbawall.com907.586.1070AECC1374/14/2020 7:17:27 AM G:\_Projects\19019\CAD\SD\Arch\19019 KIB Borough BLDG - SD R19.rvtApril 13, 2020A202Kodiak Island BoroughBorough BuildingMechanical Upgrade19019Borough Building -2nd Floor PlanExisting1Borough Building - 2nd Floor PlanSCALE:016'8'4'$&(90,$4$$&(90,$4RADON - 234922AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 151 of 219 Limited Indoor Air Quality Assessment KIB Administration Building 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska ATTACHMENT D EVM-7 Meter Certificate of Calibration AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 152 of 219 TSI INCORPORATED -OCONOMOWOC 1060 Corporate Center Drive, Oconomowoc, WI 53066 USA tel 651490 2811 + toll free BOO 245 0779 + web www.tsi.com Certificate of Calibration Certi�icate No:852490 EMI050008 Submitted By: Serial Number: Customer ID: Model: Test Conditions: TTT ENVIRONMENTAL LLC 4201 B ST HEADQUARTERS ANCHORAGE AK EMI050008 N/A EVM-7 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR Temperature: 18 °C to 29 °C Humidity: 20% to 80% Barometric Pressure: 890 mbar to 1050 mbar SubAssemblies: Description/Measurement Uncertainty: SENSOR C02/±29% SENSOR C0/±12% SENSOR PIO PPM/±5% Estimated at 95% Confidence Level (k=2) Calibrated per Procedure: 074V705 Reference Standard(s): Date Received: Date Issued: Valid Until: Model Conditiono, As Found: As Left: Serial Number: 132375 4CF 485628129 010409004 2/25/2020 3/5/2020 3/5/2022 OUT OF TOLERANCE IN TOLERANCE Page 1 of 2 An!S09001 Registered Company I.D. Number 1205985 1251588 1276125 MF000245 Device Last Calibration Date Calibration Due Calibrated By: Reviewed By: CO2 CALIBRATION GAS C4H8 CALIBRATION GAS CO CALIBRATION GAS DUST ISO 12103-1 A2 FINE 9/1/2019 11/1/2024 1/1/2020 1/1/2025 2/1/2020 2/1/2025 3/5/2020 3/5/2020 This report certifies that all calibration equipment used in the test is traceable to NIST, and applies only to the unit identified under equipment above. This report must not be reproduced except in its entirety without the written approval of TSI Incorporated. For each calibration measurement within the stated tolerance or "l?ass",there is at least 95% confidence in the decision that the error meets specification. Otherwise report as "Fail". 098-393 Rev. B AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 153 of 219 096-393 Rev. B TSI INCORPORATED -OCONOMOWOC 1060 Corporate Center Drive, Oconomowoc, WI 53066 USA tel 651490 2811 + toll free 800 245 0779 + web www.tsi.com Certificate of Calibration Certificate No:852490 EMI050008 (A)indicates out of tolerance condition Test T�e As Found As Left Tolerance Particulate Cal. A .056 +/-.5mg/m3 CO2 Zero A 01 0 N/A CO2 Span A OL 2500 +/-100 ppm PID PPM Zero A 5.56 0.00 N/A PID PPM Span A 91. 3 100 +/-5% PIO PPB Span +/-5% Toxic Zero A 7 0 NIA Toxic Span A 8 200 +/-5% Page 2 of 2 An!S09001 Registered Company of Dust Ref AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 154 of 219 TTT Environmental INSPECTION/CALIBRATION REPORT The preferred source for instrument Rentals, Sales, Service, and Supplies! Calibration Date: 3/12/2020 ----------- Report Date ( check-out): __ ...;3=./..:..:12=-/2=.:0=-=2=-=0 _____ _ Company Name: EHS S200369 ___ ...;..;;.. ___________ ;;;;.;::_;:....:....;:..;;;.;;_ Make: Quest EVM-Series -------------- Seri a I #: EMJ050008 __ _;_:....:....:...:....:..;;.._ _______ _Phone: __________ _ Model: EVM7 ----------- TIT ID#: QuestEVM7-09 EMJ050008 INSTRUMENT INSPECTION Item Condition at Check-out Condition at Check-in Power/function switches: Display: Software version: Case: Batterv: Pump flow rate: Sensor Zero Value CO2 0.0 co 0.0 PID 0.0 Good Good R.10V Good Fully charqed Good CALIBRATION* Calibration* -------------------------------------------------------------Desired reading Instrument reading 1000 oom 1030 oom 35 oom 35 oom 100 oom 100 ppm *Calibrated per manufacturer instructions. CALIBRATION GAS INFORMATION Components Cone. Lot# Manuf. Accuracy Carbon Monoxide (CO) 35ppm 18-5563 ISG +/-2% Carbon Dioxide (CO2) 1000ppm II II II lsobutylene 100oom 19-5570 ISG +/-2% Alarm Level ---------------------------------------- ·- Low n/a -... n/a n/a Fill Date 9/7/2018 II 5/18/2019 Hiah n/a -- n/a n/a Exp. Date 9/7/2020 II 11/18/2021 Comments: _________________________________ _ Inspected/Calibrated by: _S _te_v_e_Z_ie_,g._le_r ____________ _ Position: Phone: (907) 770-9041 Fax: (907) 770-9046 Email: info@tttenviro.com ----------- www.tttenviro.com AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 155 of 219 AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 156 of 219 AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 157 of 219 AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 158 of 219 AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 159 of 219 Kodiak Island Borough and Maintenance Building Schematic Design Narrative RSA Project No. L9260 Page 1 35% Schematic Design August 31, 2020 Design Criteria: The latest adopted version of the following codes and standards, as amended by the Kodiak Island Borough, are currently applicable for this project: 2012 International Building Code (IBC) 2012 International Fire Code (IFC) 2012 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) 2012 International Mechanical Code (IMC) 2012 International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC) 2012 Uniform Plumbing Code (UPC) 2017 National Electrical Code (NEC) 2010 National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code (NFPA 72) 2010 NFPA Standard for Installation of Sprinkler Systems (NFPA 13) Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Mechanical Design Conditions: Design conditions for determining building loads and equipment sizing will be in accordance with climatic conditions as indicated in the 2017 ASHRAE Fundamentals Handbook, Appendix: Climatic Design Data Table, that information is listed below: Station: Kodiak, Alaska WMO No.: 703500 Latitude: 57.751N Longitude: 152.486W Winter Design: 9.0°F (99.6%) Summer Design: 68.5°F DB, 57.1°F WB (0.4% MCWB) Extreme Annual Min.: -2.8°F (mean) Extreme Annual Max.: 75.4°F (mean) Existing Mechanical System Description: The existing boiler system in the borough building consists of two Cleaver Brooks 2,092 MBH firetube boilers. The existing boiler system in the maintenance building consists of two Cleaver Brooks 1,225 MBH firetube boilers. The boilers in both buildings were manufactured in 1968 and are past the end of their useful life expectancy of 30-40 years. The associated piping, pumps and controls for the boiler systems are past the end of their useful life expectancy. The combustion air systems in the buildings do not meet current code requirements. The fuel oil day tank in the borough building is past the end of its useful life expectancy and should be replaced. The boilers in the both buildings are significantly oversized and not efficient. Domestic hot water for the building is generated by a shell and tube heat exchanger located in the mechanical fan room on the first floor of the building. The shell and tube heat exchanger uses hot water from the boiler system to heat the domestic water. The heat exchanger is past the end of its useful life expectancy and is oversized for the current hot water needs of the building. New Mechanical System Description: AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 160 of 219 Kodiak Island Borough and Maintenance Building Schematic Design Narrative RSA Project No. L9260 Page 2 35% Schematic Design August 31, 2020 The two existing borough building boilers will be replaced with one oil fired boiler and a new electric boiler. The electric boiler will be connected with a dedicated electrical service and operate to provide building heating at a reduced electrical rate when KEA has excess power. See Electrical portion of this narrative for additional description on electrical work required. The existing maintenance building boilers will be replaced with a single three pass oil fired boiler. The remodel work in both buildings will include new piping, pumps, hydronic specialties and controls for the boiler systems in the boiler rooms. The existing components are not salvageable for re-use. The new boilers are sized for building heating, water heating will be provided by electric water heaters. The new boiler systems will be piped in a primary/secondary arrangement to allow lead/lag alternation and ensure minimum flow through each boiler. Each boiler will have a circulation pump and the building heating system will be re-fed by new variable speed pumps. New combustion air systems will be installed to comply with current code requirements for the new boilers. The combustion air systems will include a ventilation fan and small relief/combustion air opening. New fuel oil day tanks will be installed to connect to the existing fuel oil storage tanks. The existing pneumatic controls in the boiler rooms will be replaced with a digital control system. The digital control system will be specified to be compatible with existing borough building control systems. The new system piping arrangement and equipment will be similar to recent boiler upgrade projects at Kodiak Middle School and Peterson Elementary School. In addition to boiler upgrades, the existing water heaters will be demolished and a new electric water heater used for the water heating in the building. The electric water heater will allow the boiler system to be shut down in summer when outside air temperature is warm enough to not require building heating. Existing Electrical System Description Site Electrical: The Borough and Maintenance Building are supplied with power from a 500kVA, 277/480V KEA transformer located next to the Maintenance Building. Per KIB records, both buildings are on the same meter. Peak demand in the last 12 months is 49kW. Assuming a 0.9 power factor and adding 25% per NEC requirements, the calculated peak demand for both buildings is 68kVA, or 82 Amps on the 480V service. Power Distribution: The Borough Building has a 277/480V, 400A main distribution panel (MDP) and 200kW standby generator. The incoming utility service and generator output are routed through an automatic transfer switch and 250A circuit breaker. From the MDP, there is a 75kW step down transformer to provide 120/208V power to a 225A, 120/208V panelboard next to the MDP. The MDP, transformer, and 120208V panelboard are Westinghouse equipment that is past its useful service life. The Maintenance Building has a 600A rated MDP with 450A main circuit breaker. A 45kVA step- down transformer feeds power to panel ‘G’ in the boiler room. All equipment is original to the building and past its useful service life. There is no standby generator or transfer switch for this building. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 161 of 219 Kodiak Island Borough and Maintenance Building Schematic Design Narrative RSA Project No. L9260 Page 3 35% Schematic Design August 31, 2020 New Electrical System Description Power Distribution: Under all options involving the Borough Building, the 400A MDP, generator, transfer switch, 75kVA transformer, and 120/208V panelboard will be demolished. The MDP, transformer, and 120/208V panelboard will be replaced. The MDP can be downsized to 250A rated, with the transformer and panelboard replaced with the same size equipment. Under all options involving the Maintenance Building, the 600A MDP, 45kVA transformer, and 120/208V panelboard will be demolished. The MDP, transformer, and 120/208V panelboard will be replaced. The MDP can be downsized to 250A rated, with the transformer and panelboard replaced with the same size equipment. Standby Power: A new standby generator will be provided in a weatherproof enclosure, with the tentative location near the KEA service transformer. The services to both buildings will be intercepted and routed through new ATS at each building. The exact configuration of the service feeders is not known as the two buildings come off of a single meter, but it is assumed the generator will have (3) unit mounted breakers. Two of the breakers will be fully rated for their respective building with the third feeding a load bank connection for testing. Based on demand history, the generator could be sized as small as 75kW, however, this would leave little spare capacity for expansion or additional loads. The exact size of the generator requires further discussion but a preliminary size of 100kW/125kVA with a 200A rated automatic transfer switch will power both buildings and leave capacity for expansion. Lighting: Work in either building will include demolition of the fluorescent lighting and replacement with LED fixtures. Based on the equipment layout and size of the room, an estimated total of (6) in each building will be provided. Basis of design is Lithonia CLX series strip fixtures. Mechanical Support: Work in either building will include new circuits for all mechanical equipment installed. Any general purpose receptacles will be replaced at existing locations. New DDC panels will be provided with power and a telecom connection to the building’s telecom system. Electric Boiler: Under all options with a new electric boiler, it is assumed a new service will be installed to provide power to the boiler. This will match the configuration of other sites, as it provides for KEA to have a way to command the boiler off based on system demand, and provides for separate metering for the rate structure in place for use of the boiler. Preliminary sizing of the boiler is 240kW, which will require a new 400A, 480V service from the transformer. A new boiler service disconnect will be pad-mounted in an enclosure near the utility transformer, with connection for KEA to remotely access. A new 4” conduit with 4#500 AWG and #1/0 ground will be provided from the transformer to the Borough Building boiler room and land on a local disconnect for the boiler. Signal wiring from the disconnect to the building control system will be routed in new conduit. At this time, it is assumed that the standby generator will not provide backup power for the boiler, similar to other projects. AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 162 of 219 AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 163 of 219 JensenInc.REVISIONSSHEET TITLEDATE:FILE:YorbaWall522 West 10th SteetJuneau, Alaska 99801jensenyorbawall.com907.586.1070AECC1374/14/2020 7:21:23 AM G:\_Projects\19019\CAD\SD\Arch\19019 KIB Borough BLDG - SD R19.rvt 08/31/2020Kodiak Island Borough Borough Building Mechanical Upgrade Mechanical andElectrical ConsultingEngineersASR670 West Fireweed Lane, Suite 200Anchorage, AK 99503(907)276-0521Corporate No.: AECC542NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONABBREVIATIONSLEGENDS, SCHEDULES,L9260M001PIPING LEGENDDUCTWORK LEGENDABBREVIATIONSLOGICXMX.XXMX.XELECTRIC BOILER SCHEDULEPUMP SCHEDULEFUEL-FIRED BOILER SCHEDULEEXPANSION TANK SCHEDULEAGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 164 of 219 JensenInc.REVISIONSSHEET TITLEDATE:FILE:YorbaWall522 West 10th SteetJuneau, Alaska 99801jensenyorbawall.com907.586.1070AECC1374/14/2020 7:21:23 AM G:\_Projects\19019\CAD\SD\Arch\19019 KIB Borough BLDG - SD R19.rvt 08/31/2020Kodiak Island Borough Borough Building Mechanical Upgrade Mechanical andElectrical ConsultingEngineersASR670 West Fireweed Lane, Suite 200Anchorage, AK 99503(907)276-0521Corporate No.: AECC542NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSCHEDULESMECHANICAL L9260M002ELECTRIC WATER HEATER SCHEDULEAIR SEPARATOR SCHEDULEGLYCOL TANK SCHEDULEFAN SCHEDULEHEAT EXCHANGER SCHEDULELOUVER SCHEDULEDAY TANK SCHEDULEAGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 165 of 219 UPFan100XFan100XJensenInc.REVISIONSSHEET TITLEDATE:FILE:YorbaWall522 West 10th SteetJuneau, Alaska 99801jensenyorbawall.com907.586.1070AECC1374/14/2020 7:21:23 AM G:\_Projects\19019\CAD\SD\Arch\19019 KIB Borough BLDG - SD R19.rvt 08/31/2020Kodiak Island Borough Borough Building Mechanical Upgrade Mechanical andElectrical ConsultingEngineersASR670 West Fireweed Lane, Suite 200Anchorage, AK 99503(907)276-0521Corporate No.: AECC542NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDEMOLITION PLANSRESTROOMKIB ADMIN BLDGL9260M101KEYPLANNO SCALE1KIB ADMIN BLDG - FAN ROOM DEMOLITION PLANSCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"GENERAL NOTES:2KIB ADMIN BLDG - FAN ROOM REMODEL PLANSCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"SHEET NOTES:AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 166 of 219 DNDNDNOpentoBelowJensenInc.REVISIONSSHEET TITLEDATE:FILE:YorbaWall522 West 10th SteetJuneau, Alaska 99801jensenyorbawall.com907.586.1070AECC1374/14/2020 7:21:23 AM G:\_Projects\19019\CAD\SD\Arch\19019 KIB Borough BLDG - SD R19.rvt 08/31/2020Kodiak Island Borough Borough Building Mechanical Upgrade Mechanical andElectrical ConsultingEngineersASR670 West Fireweed Lane, Suite 200Anchorage, AK 99503(907)276-0521Corporate No.: AECC542NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDEMOLITION PLANBOILER ROOMKIB ADMIN BLDGL9260M1021KIB ADMIN BLDG BOILER ROOM - HVAC DEMOLITION PLAN (LOWER)SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"KEYPLANNO SCALEGENERAL NOTES:SHEET NOTES:AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 167 of 219 DNDNDNOpentoBelowJensenInc.REVISIONSSHEET TITLEDATE:FILE:YorbaWall522 West 10th SteetJuneau, Alaska 99801jensenyorbawall.com907.586.1070AECC1374/14/2020 7:21:23 AM G:\_Projects\19019\CAD\SD\Arch\19019 KIB Borough BLDG - SD R19.rvt 08/31/2020Kodiak Island Borough Borough Building Mechanical Upgrade Mechanical andElectrical ConsultingEngineersASR670 West Fireweed Lane, Suite 200Anchorage, AK 99503(907)276-0521Corporate No.: AECC542NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPIPING DEMOLITION PLANBOILER ROOM KIB ADMIN BLDGL9260M1031KIB ADMIN BLDG BOILER ROOM - PIPING DEMOLITION PLANSCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"KEYPLANNO SCALEGENERAL NOTES:SHEET NOTES:AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 168 of 219 DNDNDNOpentoBelowJensenInc.REVISIONSSHEET TITLEDATE:FILE:YorbaWall522 West 10th SteetJuneau, Alaska 99801jensenyorbawall.com907.586.1070AECC1374/14/2020 7:21:23 AM G:\_Projects\19019\CAD\SD\Arch\19019 KIB Borough BLDG - SD R19.rvt 08/31/2020Kodiak Island Borough Borough Building Mechanical Upgrade Mechanical andElectrical ConsultingEngineersASR670 West Fireweed Lane, Suite 200Anchorage, AK 99503(907)276-0521Corporate No.: AECC542NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDEMOLITION PLANBOILER ROOM DUCTWORKKIB ADMIN BLDG L9260M1041KIB ADMIN BLDG BOILER ROOM - HVAC DEMOLITION PLAN (UPPER)SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"KEYPLANNO SCALEGENERAL NOTES:SHEET NOTES:AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 169 of 219 DNDNDNOpentoBelowJensenInc.REVISIONSSHEET TITLEDATE:FILE:YorbaWall522 West 10th SteetJuneau, Alaska 99801jensenyorbawall.com907.586.1070AECC1374/14/2020 7:21:23 AM G:\_Projects\19019\CAD\SD\Arch\19019 KIB Borough BLDG - SD R19.rvt 08/31/2020Kodiak Island Borough Borough Building Mechanical Upgrade Mechanical andElectrical ConsultingEngineersASR670 West Fireweed Lane, Suite 200Anchorage, AK 99503(907)276-0521Corporate No.: AECC542NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONREMODEL PLANBOILER ROOMKIB ADMIN BUILDINGL9260M1051KIB ADMIN BLDG BOILER ROOM - HVAC REMODEL PLAN (LOWER)SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"KEYPLANNO SCALEAGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 170 of 219 DNDNDNOpentoBelowJensenInc.REVISIONSSHEET TITLEDATE:FILE:YorbaWall522 West 10th SteetJuneau, Alaska 99801jensenyorbawall.com907.586.1070AECC1374/14/2020 7:21:23 AM G:\_Projects\19019\CAD\SD\Arch\19019 KIB Borough BLDG - SD R19.rvt 08/31/2020Kodiak Island Borough Borough Building Mechanical Upgrade Mechanical andElectrical ConsultingEngineersASR670 West Fireweed Lane, Suite 200Anchorage, AK 99503(907)276-0521Corporate No.: AECC542NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONREMODEL PLANBOILER ROOM KIB ADMIN BUILDINGL9260M106KEYPLANNO SCALE1KIB ADMIN BLDG BOILER ROOM - HVAC REMODEL PLAN (UPPER)SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 171 of 219 JensenInc.REVISIONSSHEET TITLEDATE:FILE:YorbaWall522 West 10th SteetJuneau, Alaska 99801jensenyorbawall.com907.586.1070AECC1374/14/2020 7:21:23 AM G:\_Projects\19019\CAD\SD\Arch\19019 KIB Borough BLDG - SD R19.rvt 08/31/2020Kodiak Island Borough Borough Building Mechanical Upgrade Mechanical andElectrical ConsultingEngineersASR670 West Fireweed Lane, Suite 200Anchorage, AK 99503(907)276-0521Corporate No.: AECC542NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONREMODEL SCHEMATICBOILER PIPINGKIB ADMIN BUILDINGL9260M1071KIB ADMIN BLDG BOILER PIPING REMODEL SCHEMATICNO SCALEAGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 172 of 219 Room109Room109JensenInc.REVISIONSSHEET TITLEDATE:FILE:YorbaWall522 West 10th SteetJuneau, Alaska 99801jensenyorbawall.com907.586.1070AECC1374/14/2020 7:21:23 AM G:\_Projects\19019\CAD\SD\Arch\19019 KIB Borough BLDG - SD R19.rvt 08/31/2020Kodiak Island Borough Borough Building Mechanical Upgrade Mechanical andElectrical ConsultingEngineersASR670 West Fireweed Lane, Suite 200Anchorage, AK 99503(907)276-0521Corporate No.: AECC542NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDEMOLITION PLANSBOILER ROOMMAINTENANCE BLDG L9260M2011MAINTENANCE BLDG BOILER ROOM (LOWER) - DEMOLITION PLANSCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"KEYPLANNO SCALEGENERAL NOTES:1,2M2012MAINTENANCE BLDG BOILER ROOM (UPPER) - DEMOLITION PLANSCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"SHEET NOTES:AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 173 of 219 Room109Room109JensenInc.REVISIONSSHEET TITLEDATE:FILE:YorbaWall522 West 10th SteetJuneau, Alaska 99801jensenyorbawall.com907.586.1070AECC1374/14/2020 7:21:23 AM G:\_Projects\19019\CAD\SD\Arch\19019 KIB Borough BLDG - SD R19.rvt 08/31/2020Kodiak Island Borough Borough Building Mechanical Upgrade Mechanical andElectrical ConsultingEngineersASR670 West Fireweed Lane, Suite 200Anchorage, AK 99503(907)276-0521Corporate No.: AECC542NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONREMODEL PLANSBOILER ROOMMAINTENANCE BLDGL9260M2021MAINTENANCE BLDG BOILER ROOM (LOWER) - REMODEL PLANSCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"KEYPLANNO SCALE1,2M2022MAINTENANCE BLDG BOILER ROOM (UPPER) - REMODEL PLANSCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"SHEET NOTES:AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 174 of 219 JensenInc.REVISIONSSHEET TITLEDATE:FILE:YorbaWall522 West 10th SteetJuneau, Alaska 99801jensenyorbawall.com907.586.1070AECC1374/14/2020 7:21:23 AM G:\_Projects\19019\CAD\SD\Arch\19019 KIB Borough BLDG - SD R19.rvt 08/31/2020Kodiak Island Borough Borough Building Mechanical Upgrade Mechanical andElectrical ConsultingEngineersASR670 West Fireweed Lane, Suite 200Anchorage, AK 99503(907)276-0521Corporate No.: AECC542NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONAND REMODELBOILER RM DEMOLITIONMAINTENANCE BLDGL9260M2031MAINTENANCE BLDG BOILER ROOM DEMOLITION SCHEMATICNO SCALE2MAINTENANCE BLDG BOILER ROOM REMODEL SCHEMATICNO SCALEGENERAL NOTES:3M-WH-1 PIPING SCHEMATICNO SCALEAGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 175 of 219 AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 176 of 219 AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 177 of 219 AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 178 of 219 AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 179 of 219 AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 180 of 219 AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 181 of 219 AGENDA ITEM #2.e.Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ...Page 182 of 219 HMS Project No. 2009935% DESIGN SUBMITTALCONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATEKODIAK ISLAND BOROUGHADMIN AND MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS MECHANICAL UPGRADESKODIAK, ALASKAPREPARED FOR:Jensen Yorba Wall, Inc.522 West 10th StreetJuneau, Alaska 99801October 9, 20204103 Minnesota Drive • Anchorage, Alaska 99503 p: 907.561.1653 • f: 907.562.0420 • e: mail@hmsalaska.com AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 183 of 219 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ADMIN AND MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS MECHANICAL UPGRADESKODIAK, ALASKA35% DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATEHMS Project No.: 20099PAGE 2DATE: 10/9/2020DRAWINGS AND DOCUMENTSLevel of Documents:(20) 35% design drawings Date:September 17, 2020Provided By:Jensen Yorba Wall, Inc. of Juneau, Alaska, and their subconsultant RSA Engineering, Inc. of Anchorage, AlaskaRATESPricing is based on current material, equipment and freight costs.Labor Rates:A.S. Title 36 working 60 hours per weekPremium Time:16.70%Note:Mechanical contractor is primeBIDDING ASSUMPTIONSContract:Standard construction contract without restrictive bidding clausesBidding Situation:Competitive bids assumedBid Date:Spring 2021Start of Construction:Summer 2021Construction Time:Within (3) months completionEXCLUDED COSTS1. A/E design fees2. Administrative and management costs3. Furniture, furnishings and equipment (except those specifically included)NOTES REGARDING THE PREPARATION OF THIS ESTIMATEAGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 184 of 219 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ADMIN AND MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS MECHANICAL UPGRADESKODIAK, ALASKA35% DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATEHMS Project No.: 20099PAGE 3DATE: 10/9/2020GENERALWhen included in HMS Inc.'s scope of services, opinions or estimates of probable construction costs are prepared on the basis of HMS Inc.'sexperience and qualifications and represent HMS Inc.'s judgment as a professional generally familiar with the industry. However, since HMS Inc.has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment or services furnished by others, over contractor's methods of determining prices, or overcompetitive bidding or market conditions, HMS Inc. cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction cost will not varyfrom HMS Inc.'s opinions or estimates of probable construction cost.This estimate assumes normal escalation based on the current economic climate. HMS Inc. will continue to monitor this, as well as other international, domestic and local events, and the resulting construction climate, and will adjust costs and contingencies as deemed appropriate.Due to the rapidly evolving nature of the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic and its as-yet unknown affect on the economy, and more specifically theconstruction industry, HMS Inc. is incorporating an additional contingency titled 'Unique Market Risk'. The amount provided for in the estimate willbe adjusted as the situation continues to change and the effect on construction pricing becomes more predictable.GROSS FLOOR AREAKODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ADMIN BUILDINGFan Room189 SFBoiler Room494 SFTOTAL ADMIN BUILDING:683SFMAINTENANCE BUILDINGBoiler Room320SFNOTES REGARDING THE PREPARATION OF THIS ESTIMATE (Continued)AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 185 of 219 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ADMIN AND MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS MECHANICAL UPGRADESKODIAK, ALASKA35% DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATEHMS Project No.: 20099PAGE 4DATE: 10/9/2020Material Labor Total01 - SITE WORK$ 121,440 $ 85,991 $ 207,43102 - SUBSTRUCTURE0 0 003 - SUPERSTRUCTURE0 0 004 - EXTERIOR CLOSURE0 0 005 - ROOF SYSTEMS0 0 006 - INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION0 0 007 - CONVEYING SYSTEMS0 0 008 - MECHANICAL120,353 99,561 219,91409 - ELECTRICAL66,371 74,153 140,52410 - EQUIPMENT0 0 011 - SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION0 0 0SUBTOTAL:$ 308,164 $ 259,705 $ 567,86912 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS254,806SUBTOTAL:$ 822,67513 - CONTINGENCIES127,616TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST:$ 950,291COST PER SQUARE FOOT:$ 947.45 /SFGROSS FLOOR AREA (FAN ROOM AND TWO BOILER ROOMS ONLY):1,003 SF35% DESIGN COST SUMMARYAGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 186 of 219 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ADMIN AND MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS MECHANICAL UPGRADESKODIAK, ALASKA35% DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATEHMS Project No.: 20099PAGE 5DATE: 10/9/2020Total Material Labor Material/Labor Total Cost Cost per SF 01 - SITE WORK$ 207,431 $ 206.81 011 - Hazmat Abatement $ 50,511 $ 57,207 $ 107,718 107.40 012 - Site Preparation 234 732 966 0.96 013 - Site Improvements 1,877 1,093 2,970 2.96 014 - Site Mechanical 0 0 0 0.00 015 - Site Electrical 68,818 26,959 95,777 95.49 02 - SUBSTRUCTURE $ 0 $ 0.00 021 - Standard Foundations $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 0.00 022 - Slab on Grade 0 0 0 0.00 023 - Basement0 0 0 0.00 024 - Special Foundations 0 0 0 0.00 03 - SUPERSTRUCTURE$ 0 $ 0.00 031 - Floor Construction $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 0.00 032 - Roof Construction 0 0 0 0.00 033 - Stair Construction 0 0 0 0.00 04 - EXTERIOR CLOSURE $ 0 $ 0.00 041 - Exterior Walls $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 0.00 042 - Exterior Doors and Windows 0 0 0 0.00 05 - ROOF SYSTEMS $ 0 $ 0.00 051 - Roofing$ 0 $ 0 $ 0 0.00 052 - Skylights0 0 0 0.00 06 - INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION$ 0 $ 0.00 061 - Partitions and Doors $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 0.00 062 - Interior Finishes 0 0 0 0.00 063 - Specialties0 0 0 0.00 07 - CONVEYING SYSTEMS $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0.00 ElementELEMENTAL SUMMARYAGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 187 of 219 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ADMIN AND MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS MECHANICAL UPGRADESKODIAK, ALASKA35% DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATEHMS Project No.: 20099PAGE 6DATE: 10/9/2020Total Material Labor Material/Labor Total Cost Cost per SFElementELEMENTAL SUMMARY 08 - MECHANICAL $ 219,914 $ 219.26 081 - Demolition $ 1,580 $ 45,696 $ 47,276 47.13 082 - Plumbing 16,765 1,020 17,785 17.73 083 - HVAC 102,008 52,845 154,853 154.39 084 - Fire Protection 0 0 0 0.00 085 - Special Mechanical Systems 0 0 0 0.00 09 - ELECTRICAL$ 140,524 $ 140.10 091 - Demolition $ 900 $ 18,479 $ 19,379 19.32 092 - Service and Distribution 57,295 39,361 96,656 96.37 093 - Lighting and Power 8,176 16,313 24,489 24.42 094 - Special Electrical Systems 0 0 0 0.00 10 - EQUIPMENT$ 0 $ 0.00 101 - Fixed and Movable Equipment $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 0.00 102 - Furnishings0 0 0 0.00 11 - SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0.00 SUBTOTAL DIRECT WORK: $ 308,164 $ 259,705 $ 567,869 12 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS$ 254,806 $ 254.04 121 - Mobilization$ 7,200 7.18 122 - Operation Costs174,580 174.06 123 - Profit73,026 72.81 13 - CONTINGENCIES$ 127,616 $ 127.23 131 - Estimator's Contingency 10.00% $ 82,268 82.02 131 - Unique Market Risk 3.50% 31,673 31.58 132 - Escalation Contingency 1.46% 13,675 13.63 TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST:$ 950,291 $947.45 /SFGROSS FLOOR AREA:1,003 SF AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 188 of 219 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ADMIN AND MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS MECHANICAL UPGRADESKODIAK, ALASKA35% DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATEHMS Project No.: 20099PAGE 7DATE: 10/9/202001 - SITE WORK MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL TOTALQUANTITY UNIT RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL UNIT RATE MATERIAL/LABOR011 - Hazmat Abatement$ $ $ $ $ $Note: Quantities assumed. Based on hazardous material assessmentdated April 23, 2020, by EHS-Alaska, Inc.MOBILIZATION, DEMOBILIZATION, PREPARATION, ETC.Mobilization/demobilization 1 LOT 1000.00 1,000 2500.00 2,500 3500.00 3,500 Abatement equipment, Hepa filter, air machines,etc.1 LOT 3500.00 3,500 500.00 500 4000.00 4,000 Protective clothing, masks, gloves, etc. 1 LOT 1200.00 1,200 1200.00 1,200 Decontamination station for equipment, includinghoses, drains, etc. (1) 400 SF 3.50 1,400 5.20 2,080 8.70 3,480 Decontamination station for personnel, includingshower, drains, etc. (1) 200 SF 5.75 1,150 8.00 1,600 13.75 2,750 Drum up contaminated water from decontaminationstations for proper disposal 5 DRMS 75.00 375 115.00 575 190.00 950 TCLP tests2 EA 1500.00 3,000 1500.00 3,000 Air sample PCM tests 20 EABy Hygienist Sampler equipment and hygienist 3 WKS 150.00 450 1800.00 5,400 1950.00 5,850 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 189 of 219 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ADMIN AND MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS MECHANICAL UPGRADESKODIAK, ALASKA35% DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATEHMS Project No.: 20099PAGE 8DATE: 10/9/202001 - SITE WORK MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL TOTALQUANTITY UNIT RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL UNIT RATE MATERIAL/LABOR011 - Hazmat Abatement$ $ $ $ $ $REMOVE FOLLOWING ACM FOR ABATEMENTAdmin BuildingRemove roofing mastics and sealants at areas ofwork20 SF 3.50 70 3.50 70 Remove built-up roofing system at areas of work 20 SF 1.60 32 1.60 32 Vacuum roof decks20 SF 0.12 2 0.18 4 0.30 6 Remove flange gaskets and valves packing 9 EA 350.00 3,150 350.00 3,150 Remove air handling unit duct pin mastics 45 SF 25.00 1,125 25.00 1,125 Remove remnant ACM debris at copper pipe 1 LOT 110.00 110 110.00 110 Maintenance BuildingCeiling gypboard containing ACM joint compound,including stud framing 320 SF 1.90 608 1.90 608 Remove roofing mastics and sealants 4 SF 3.50 14 3.50 14 Remove built-up roofing system 4 SF 1.60 6 1.60 6 Vacuum roof decks4 SF 0.18 1 0.18 1 Remove flange gaskets and valves packing 5 EA 350.00 1,750 350.00 1,750 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 190 of 219 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ADMIN AND MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS MECHANICAL UPGRADESKODIAK, ALASKA35% DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATEHMS Project No.: 20099PAGE 9DATE: 10/9/202001 - SITE WORK MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL TOTALQUANTITY UNIT RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL UNIT RATE MATERIAL/LABOR011 - Hazmat Abatement$ $ $ $ $ $REMOVE FOLLOWING ACM FOR ABATEMENT (Continued)Maintenance Building (Continued)Remove air handling unit duct pin mastics(quantity to be determined) 45 SF 25.00 1,125 25.00 1,125 Maintenance Building CrawlspaceNote: Crawlspace area assumed to be equivalent tomaintenance building boiler room (320 SF).Remove 2" contaminated soil by hand (difficultworking conditions)3 CY 145.00 435 145.00 435 Remove ACM pipe insulation (quantity to bedetermined)1 LOT 620.00 620 620.00 620 Remove air handling unit duct pin mastics(quantity to be determined) 5 SF 25.00 125 25.00 125 Remove ACM floor penetration sealants (quantityto be determined)1 LOT 850.00 850 850.00 850 DisposalContainerize and dispose ACM debris out ofstate2 CTRS 3500.00 7,000 7500.00 15,000 11000.00 22,000 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 191 of 219 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ADMIN AND MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS MECHANICAL UPGRADESKODIAK, ALASKA35% DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATEHMS Project No.: 20099PAGE 10DATE: 10/9/202001 - SITE WORK MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL TOTALQUANTITY UNIT RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL UNIT RATE MATERIAL/LABOR011 - Hazmat Abatement$ $ $ $ $ $MISCELLANEOUSACM abatement crew (per diem) 100 MD 180.00 18,000 180.00 18,000 Air fares from Anchorage to Kodiak 5 RT 350.00 1,750 350.00 1,750 SUBTOTAL:$ 38,827 $ 37,680 $ 76,507 Labor Premium Time 16.70%6,293 6,293 SUBTOTAL:$ 38,827 $ 43,973 $ 82,800 Subcontractor's Overhead and Profit on Materialand Labor20.00% 7,765 8,795 16,560 Bonds and Insurances 3.25% 1,514 1,715 3,229 Contingency5.00% 2,405 2,724 5,129 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST:$ 50,511 $ 57,207 $ 107,718 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 192 of 219 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ADMIN AND MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS MECHANICAL UPGRADESKODIAK, ALASKA35% DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATEHMS Project No.: 20099PAGE 11DATE: 10/9/202001 - SITE WORK MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL TOTALQUANTITY UNIT RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL UNIT RATE MATERIAL/LABOR012 - Site Preparation$ $ $ $ $ $Protect paved areas in place 1 LOT 100.00 100 300.00 300 400.00 400 Protect oil tank1 EA 20.00 20 72.50 73 92.50 93 Protect existing landscaping, trees, etc. 1 LOT 75.00 75 150.00 150 225.00 225 SUBTOTAL:$ 195 $ 523 $ 718 Labor Premium Time 16.70%87 87 SUBTOTAL:$ 195 $ 610 $ 805 Subcontractor's Overhead and Profit on Materialand Labor20.00% 39 122 161 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST:$ 234 $ 732 $ 966 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 193 of 219 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ADMIN AND MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS MECHANICAL UPGRADESKODIAK, ALASKA35% DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATEHMS Project No.: 20099PAGE 12DATE: 10/9/202001 - SITE WORK MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL TOTALQUANTITY UNIT RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL UNIT RATE MATERIAL/LABOR013 - Site Improvements$ $ $ $ $ $6'0" tall cedar fence with one gate at generatorpad45 LF 32.21 1,449 13.95 628 46.16 2,077 Re-seed disturbed soils at areas of work 765 SF 0.15 115 0.20 153 0.35 268 SUBTOTAL:$ 1,564 $ 781 $ 2,345 Labor Premium Time 16.70%130 130 SUBTOTAL:$ 1,564 $ 911 $ 2,475 Subcontractor's Overhead and Profit on Materialand Labor20.00% 313 182 495 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST:$ 1,877 $ 1,093 $ 2,970 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 194 of 219 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ADMIN AND MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS MECHANICAL UPGRADESKODIAK, ALASKA35% DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATEHMS Project No.: 20099PAGE 13DATE: 10/9/202001 - SITE WORK MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL TOTALQUANTITY UNIT RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL UNIT RATE MATERIAL/LABOR015 - Site Electrical$ $ $ $ $ $Buried service to building 1 LOTBy KEA 100 KW, 480 volt, three phase emergencygenerator, weatherproof enclosure 1 EA 32300.00 32,300 4700.00 4,700 37000.00 37,000 50 KW load bank, Nema 3R enclosure 1 EA 6895.00 6,895 1250.00 1,250 8145.00 8,145 3" diameter rigid steel conduit 255 LF 26.00 6,630 28.00 7,140 54.00 13,770 #300 KCMIL conductors (4) 1,020 LF 9.67 9,863 3.87 3,947 13.54 13,810 #1/0 XHHW copper conductor 255 LF 3.25 829 2.50 638 5.75 1,467 Trenching and backfill, including bedding 85 CY 6.00 510 12.00 1,020 18.00 1,530 Warning tape255 LF 0.28 71 0.22 56 0.50 127 Test and tag system1 LOT 250.00 250 500.00 500 750.00 750 SUBTOTAL:$ 57,348 $ 19,251 $ 76,599 Labor Premium Time 16.70%3,215 3,215 SUBTOTAL:$ 57,348 $ 22,466 $ 79,814 Subcontractor's Overhead and Profit on Materialand Labor20.00% 11,470 4,493 15,963 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST:$ 68,818 $ 26,959 $ 95,777 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 195 of 219 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ADMIN AND MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS MECHANICAL UPGRADESKODIAK, ALASKA35% DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATEHMS Project No.: 20099PAGE 14DATE: 10/9/202008 - MECHANICAL MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL TOTALQUANTITY UNIT RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL UNIT RATE MATERIAL/LABOR081 - Demolition$ $ $ $ $ $ADMIN BUILDINGRemove existing boiler, including appurtenances 2 EA 5500.00 11,000 5500.00 11,000 Remove existing generator and associated components1 EA 2310.00 2,310 2310.00 2,310 Remove 42/40 generator exhaust and insulation,preserve path for new work 16 LF 22.00 352 22.00 352 Demolish boiler vents, salvage path for newboiler vents (2 each)32 LF 18.00 576 18.00 576 Demolish combustion air up to ceiling 1 EA 150.00 150 150.00 150 Demolish generator exhaust termination on roof 1 EA 90.00 90 90.00 90 Provide weatherproof curb cap over removedexhaust termination with insulation to matchadjacent (roughly 12 SF) 1 LOT 200.00 200 160.00 160 360.00 360 Remove circulation pump 3 EA 450.00 1,350 450.00 1,350 Remove boiler pump, controls, and associatedappurtenances2 EAIncluded with Boiler Removal Cost Remove expansion tank 2 EA 175.00 350 175.00 350 Remove existing domestic water expansion tank,associated piping, and appurtenances 1 LOT 250.00 250 250.00 250 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 196 of 219 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ADMIN AND MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS MECHANICAL UPGRADESKODIAK, ALASKA35% DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATEHMS Project No.: 20099PAGE 15DATE: 10/9/202008 - MECHANICAL MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL TOTALQUANTITY UNIT RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL UNIT RATE MATERIAL/LABOR081 - Demolition$ $ $ $ $ $ADMIN BUILDING (Continued)Demolish fan room water heater and all associatedappurtenances, preserve piping for reconnection 1 LOT 450.00 450 450.00 450 Drain and remove day tank 1 EA 210.00 210 210.00 210 Drain down fuel piping1 EA 250.00 250 250.00 250 Remove fuel piping110 LF 6.00 660 6.00 660 Remove glycol piping 180 LF 10.50 1,890 10.50 1,890 Dispose of debris5 LDS 150.00 750 250.00 1,250 400.00 2,000 MAINTENANCE BUILDINGRemove existing boiler, including appurtenances 2 EA 5500.00 11,000 5500.00 11,000 Remove 383 gallon hot water storage tank andassociated appurtenances 1 EA 275.00 275 275.00 275 Remove heat exchanger and associatedappurtenances1 EA 825.00 825 825.00 825 Demolish boiler vent, salvage path for new boilervent16 LF 18.00 288 18.00 288 Demolish boiler vent completely 16 LF 15.50 248 15.50 248 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 197 of 219 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ADMIN AND MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS MECHANICAL UPGRADESKODIAK, ALASKA35% DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATEHMS Project No.: 20099PAGE 16DATE: 10/9/202008 - MECHANICAL MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL TOTALQUANTITY UNIT RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL UNIT RATE MATERIAL/LABOR081 - Demolition$ $ $ $ $ $MAINTENANCE BUILDING (Continued)Weatherproof cap and R-30 extruded polystyreneinsulation to demolished boiler vent at roof 1 LOT 180.00 180 140.00 140 320.00 320 Remove 8" diameter horizontal boiler flue section(1 each)8 LF 13.50 108 13.50 108 Demolish fuel line trench as needed for access tofuel piping below1 LOT 125.00 125 125.00 125 Drain and demolish glycol make-up tank 1 EA 145.00 145 145.00 145 Remove boiler pump4 EA 450.00 1,800 450.00 1,800 Remove heat exchanger pump 1 EA 195.00 195 195.00 195 Drain down fuel piping1 EA 250.00 250 250.00 250 Remove fuel piping40 LF 6.00 240 6.00 240 Remove glycol piping 140 LF 10.50 1,470 10.50 1,470 Dispose of debris3 LDS 150.00 450 250.00 750 400.00 1,200 SUBTOTAL:$ 1,580 $ 39,157 $ 40,737 Labor Premium Time 16.70%6,539 6,539 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST:$ 1,580 $ 45,696 $ 47,276 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 198 of 219 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ADMIN AND MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS MECHANICAL UPGRADESKODIAK, ALASKA35% DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATEHMS Project No.: 20099PAGE 17DATE: 10/9/202008 - MECHANICAL MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL TOTALQUANTITY UNIT RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL UNIT RATE MATERIAL/LABOR082 - Plumbing$ $ $ $ $ $ADMIN BUILDINGB-WH-1: 40 gallon, 5 KW, 208 volt, 3 phase electric water heater1 EA 11300.00 11,300 330.00 330 11630.00 11,630 Connection to existing piping 1 LOT 20.00 20 117.00 117 137.00 137 MAINTENANCE BUILDINGM-WH-1: 20 gallon, 5 KW, 208 volt, 3 phaseelectric water heater1 EA 5425.00 5,425 310.00 310 5735.00 5,735 Connection to existing piping 1 LOT 20.00 20 117.00 117 137.00 137 SUBTOTAL:$ 16,765 $ 874 $ 17,639 Labor Premium Time 16.70%146 146 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST:$ 16,765 $ 1,020 $ 17,785 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 199 of 219 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ADMIN AND MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS MECHANICAL UPGRADESKODIAK, ALASKA35% DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATEHMS Project No.: 20099PAGE 18DATE: 10/9/202008 - MECHANICAL MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL TOTALQUANTITY UNIT RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL UNIT RATE MATERIAL/LABOR083 - HVAC$ $ $ $ $ $ADMIN BUILDINGB-ET-1: 14 gallon expansion tank (hydronic) 1 EA 855.00 855 73.00 73 928.00 928 B-ET-2: 2 gallon expansion tank (domesticwater)1 EA 40.00 40 62.00 62 102.00 102 B-B-1: 1,216 MBH, Beckett Burner CF1000 fuel oil boiler1 EA 14500.00 14,500 7610.00 7,610 22110.00 22,110 B-B-2: 1,024 MBH, 300 KW electric boiler 1 EA 28500.00 28,500 4650.00 4,650 33150.00 33,150 B-CP-1: 67 GPM, fractional HP, 120 volt,single phase boiler circulation pump 1 EA 1850.00 1,850 450.00 450 2300.00 2,300 B-CP-2: 68 GPM, fractional HP, 208 volt,3 phase boiler circulation pump 1 EA 2350.00 2,350 520.00 520 2870.00 2,870 B-CP-10A and 10B: 103 GPM, 1,385 KW,208 volt, 3 phase main heating circulation pump 2 EA 2800.00 5,600 620.00 1,240 3420.00 6,840 Modify existing housekeeping pads at boilersas required1 LOT 300.00 300 750.00 750 1050.00 1,050 B-DT-1: 50 gallon, double wall day tank andrupture basin1 EA 8000.00 8,000 750.00 750 8750.00 8,750 Boiler start-up1 LOT 1395.00 1,395 1395.00 1,395 3/4" diameter hydronic copper piping 20 LF 6.50 130 8.50 170 15.00 300 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 200 of 219 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ADMIN AND MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS MECHANICAL UPGRADESKODIAK, ALASKA35% DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATEHMS Project No.: 20099PAGE 19DATE: 10/9/202008 - MECHANICAL MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL TOTALQUANTITY UNIT RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL UNIT RATE MATERIAL/LABOR083 - HVAC$ $ $ $ $ $ADMIN BUILDING (Continued)1 1/2" diameter hydronic copper piping 20 LF 20.00 400 15.00 300 35.00 700 2 1/2" diameter hydronic copper piping 30 LF 32.00 960 20.00 600 52.00 1,560 3/4" diameter copper fitting 4 EA 4.00 16 32.00 128 36.00 144 1 1/2" diameter copper fitting 4 EA 10.00 40 45.00 180 55.00 220 2 1/2" diameter copper fitting 6 EA 50.00 300 80.00 480 130.00 780 2 1/2" diameter balance valve, iron body 4 EA 650.00 2,600 90.00 360 740.00 2,960 1 1/2" diameter balance valve, bronze body 2 EA 200.00 400 55.00 110 255.00 510 2 1/2" diameter check valve, iron body 2 EA 500.00 1,000 260.00 520 760.00 1,520 1 1/2" diameter check valve, bronze body 1 EA 300.00 300 55.00 55 355.00 355 3/4" diameter check valve, bronze body 1 EA 105.00 105 35.00 35 140.00 140 Thermometer6 EA 85.00 510 50.00 300 135.00 810 Pressure gauge2 EA 110.00 220 85.00 170 195.00 390 Low water cut-off2 EA 260.00 520 110.00 220 370.00 740 Aquastat2 EA 135.00 270 75.00 150 210.00 420 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 201 of 219 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ADMIN AND MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS MECHANICAL UPGRADESKODIAK, ALASKA35% DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATEHMS Project No.: 20099PAGE 20DATE: 10/9/202008 - MECHANICAL MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL TOTALQUANTITY UNIT RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL UNIT RATE MATERIAL/LABOR083 - HVAC$ $ $ $ $ $ADMIN BUILDING (Continued)Relief valve3 EA 245.00 735 90.00 270 335.00 1,005 Drain valve with hose connection 3 EA 32.00 96 35.00 105 67.00 201 2" insulation to 2 1/2" diameter hydronic piping 30 LF 6.50 195 6.00 180 12.50 375 2" insulation to 1 1/2" diameter hydronic piping 20 LF 5.50 110 4.50 90 10.00 200 2" insulation to 3/4" diameter hydronic piping 20 LF 3.00 60 4.00 80 7.00 140 2" duct insulation98 SF 2.10 206 3.50 343 5.60 549 12"x12" motorized damper 2 EA 375.00 750 70.00 140 445.00 890 B-VF-1: 739 CFM, fractional HP, 120 volt,1 phase ventilation fan1 EA 950.00 950 550.00 550 1500.00 1,500 Test and balance ventilation equipment 8 HRS 160.00 1,280 160.00 1,280 Tiger loop assembly1 EA 210.00 210 150.00 150 360.00 360 3/4" diameter Schedule 40 steel pipe (fuel oilsystem)26 LF 5.00 130 12.00 312 17.00 442 50/20 combustion air louver assembly, includingbird screen1 EA 350.00 350 175.00 175 525.00 525 10" diameter flue16 LF 70.00 1,120 25.00 400 95.00 1,520 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 202 of 219 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ADMIN AND MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS MECHANICAL UPGRADESKODIAK, ALASKA35% DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATEHMS Project No.: 20099PAGE 21DATE: 10/9/202008 - MECHANICAL MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL TOTALQUANTITY UNIT RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL UNIT RATE MATERIAL/LABOR083 - HVAC$ $ $ $ $ $ADMIN BUILDING (Continued)B-AS-1: 3" combination air and dirt separator 1 EA 2700.00 2,700 310.00 310 3010.00 3,010 Ductwork and hangers 312 LBS 5.00 1,560 8.00 2,496 13.00 4,056 3/4" diameter steel pipe fitting 6 EA 11.65 70 44.30 266 55.95 336 3/4" diameter check valve 2 EA 105.00 210 35.00 70 140.00 280 Test and balance heat system 25 HRS 150.00 3,750 150.00 3,750 MAINTENANCE BUILDINGM-ET-1: 4.4 gallon hydronic system expansiontank1 EA 110.00 110 66.00 66 176.00 176 M-ET-2: 2.0 gallon domestic water systemexpansion tank1 EA 40.00 40 62.00 62 102.00 102 M-ET-3: 2.0 gallon hydronic system expansiontank1 EA 38.00 38 62.00 62 100.00 100 M-GT-1: 17 gallon storage/mixing tank 1 EA 650.00 650 78.00 78 728.00 728 M-B-1: 154 MBH fuel oil boiler with AFII Becketburner1 EA 3200.00 3,200 2480.00 2,480 5680.00 5,680 M-HX-1: 3 GPM, plate type heat exchanger 1 EA 460.00 460 202.00 202 662.00 662 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 203 of 219 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ADMIN AND MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS MECHANICAL UPGRADESKODIAK, ALASKA35% DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATEHMS Project No.: 20099PAGE 22DATE: 10/9/202008 - MECHANICAL MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL TOTALQUANTITY UNIT RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL UNIT RATE MATERIAL/LABOR083 - HVAC$ $ $ $ $ $MAINTENANCE BUILDING (Continued)M-DT-1: 25 gallon double wall day tank andrupture basin1 EA 4500.00 4,500 550.00 550 5050.00 5,050 M-PMP-1A and 1B: 10 GPM, 178 watt, 120 volt,single phase main heating circulation pump 2 EA 995.00 1,990 220.00 440 1215.00 2,430 M-CP-1: 9 GPM, 280 watt, 120 volt, single phaseboiler circulation pump1 EA 1100.00 1,100 349.00 349 1449.00 1,449 M-PM-4: 2.1 GPM, 106 watt, 120 volt, singlephase heat exchanger pump 1 EA 860.00 860 210.00 210 1070.00 1,070 M-PM-5: 6.0 GPM, 197 watt, 120 volt, singlephase hot water recirculation pump 1 EA 560.00 560 220.00 220 780.00 780 Modify existing housekeeping pad at boiler asrequired1 LOT 90.00 90 180.00 180 270.00 270 Boiler start up1 LOT 775.00 775 775.00 775 3/4" diameter hydronic copper piping 10 LF 6.50 65 8.50 85 15.00 150 1" diameter hydronic copper piping 10 LF 9.00 90 11.00 110 20.00 200 2 1/2" diameter hydronic copper piping 10 LF 32.00 320 20.00 200 52.00 520 3/4" diameter copper fitting 2 EA 4.00 8 32.00 64 36.00 72 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 204 of 219 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ADMIN AND MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS MECHANICAL UPGRADESKODIAK, ALASKA35% DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATEHMS Project No.: 20099PAGE 23DATE: 10/9/202008 - MECHANICAL MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL TOTALQUANTITY UNIT RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL UNIT RATE MATERIAL/LABOR083 - HVAC$ $ $ $ $ $MAINTENANCE BUILDING (Continued)1" diameter copper fitting 2 EA 10.00 20 45.00 90 55.00 110 2 1/2" diameter copper fitting 2 EA 50.00 100 80.00 160 130.00 260 2 1/2" diameter balance valve, iron body 2 EA 650.00 1,300 90.00 180 740.00 1,480 1 1/2" diameter balance valve, bronze body 2 EA 200.00 400 55.00 110 255.00 510 2 1/2" diameter check valve, iron body 1 EA 500.00 500 260.00 260 760.00 760 1 1/2" diameter check valve, bronze body 1 EA 300.00 300 55.00 55 355.00 355 3/4" diameter check valve, bronze body 1 EA 105.00 105 35.00 35 140.00 140 Thermometer3 EA 85.00 255 50.00 150 135.00 405 Pressure gauge1 EA 110.00 110 85.00 85 195.00 195 Low water cut off1 EA 260.00 260 110.00 110 370.00 370 Aquastat1 EA 135.00 135 75.00 75 210.00 210 Relief valve1 EA 245.00 245 90.00 90 335.00 335 Drain valve with hose connection 1 EA 32.00 32 35.00 35 67.00 67 2" insulation to 3/4" diameter hydronic piping 10 LF 3.00 30 4.00 40 7.00 70 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 205 of 219 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ADMIN AND MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS MECHANICAL UPGRADESKODIAK, ALASKA35% DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATEHMS Project No.: 20099PAGE 24DATE: 10/9/202008 - MECHANICAL MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL TOTALQUANTITY UNIT RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL UNIT RATE MATERIAL/LABOR083 - HVAC$ $ $ $ $ $MAINTENANCE BUILDING (Continued)2" insulation to 1" diameter hydronic piping 10 LF 4.50 45 4.30 43 8.80 88 2" insulation to 2 1/2" diameter hydronic piping 10 LF 6.50 65 6.00 60 12.50 125 10" diameter flue16 LF 70.00 1,120 25.00 400 95.00 1,520 M-AS-1: 1 1/4" diameter combination air anddirt separator1 EA 1300.00 1,300 175.00 175 1475.00 1,475 M-AS-2: 3/4" diameter combination air anddirt separator1 EA 800.00 800 83.00 83 883.00 883 M-L-1: 20/18 combustion air louver with birdscreen1 EA 100.00 100 80.00 80 180.00 180 Combustion air ductwork and hangers 76 LBS 5.00 380 8.00 608 13.00 988 2" duct insulation24 SF 2.10 50 3.50 84 5.60 134 M-VF01: 260 CFM, 1/4 HP, 120 volt, singlephase ventilation fan1 EA 550.00 550 210.00 210 760.00 760 Test and balance new ventilation equipment 8 HRS 160.00 1,280 160.00 1,280 Tiger loop assembly1 EA 210.00 210 150.00 150 360.00 360 3/4" diameter Schedule 40 steel pipe (fuel oilsystem)10 LF 5.00 50 12.00 120 17.00 170 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 206 of 219 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ADMIN AND MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS MECHANICAL UPGRADESKODIAK, ALASKA35% DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATEHMS Project No.: 20099PAGE 25DATE: 10/9/202008 - MECHANICAL MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL TOTALQUANTITY UNIT RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL UNIT RATE MATERIAL/LABOR083 - HVAC$ $ $ $ $ $MAINTENANCE BUILDING (Continued)3/4" diameter steel fitting 4 EA 11.65 47 44.30 177 55.95 224 3/4" diameter check valve 1 EA 105.00 105 35.00 35 140.00 140 Boiler connection1 EA 95.00 95 125.00 125 220.00 220 Test and balance heat system 12 HRS 150.00 1,800 150.00 1,800 SUBTOTAL:$ 102,008 $ 45,283 $ 147,291 Labor Premium Time 16.70%7,562 7,562 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST:$ 102,008 $ 52,845 $ 154,853 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 207 of 219 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ADMIN AND MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS MECHANICAL UPGRADESKODIAK, ALASKA35% DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATEHMS Project No.: 20099PAGE 26DATE: 10/9/202009 - ELECTRICAL MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL TOTALQUANTITY UNIT RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL UNIT RATE MATERIAL/LABOR091 - Demolition$ $ $ $ $ $Note: PCB ballast and exit sign remediation with Hazmat.ADMIN BUILDINGDemolish generator1 EA 2650.00 2,650 2650.00 2,650 Demolish meter/service breaker can 1 EA 500.00 500 500.00 500 Demolish main distribution electrical panel,including feeders1 EA 1150.00 1,150 1150.00 1,150 Demolish transformer1 EA 500.00 500 500.00 500 Remove subpanel1 EA 450.00 450 450.00 450 Demolish transfer switch 1 EA 250.00 250 250.00 250 Demolish feeders (assumed) 360 LF 2.10 756 2.10 756 Demolish interior light fixture 12 EA 55.00 660 55.00 660 Disconnect motor and equipment 9 EA 95.00 855 95.00 855 Demolish conduit and wiring 300 LF 3.50 1,050 3.50 1,050 Demolish junction box3 EA 40.00 120 40.00 120 Demolish starter/disconnect 3 EA 25.00 75 25.00 75 Dispose debris2 LDS 250.00 500 350.00 700 600.00 1,200 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 208 of 219 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ADMIN AND MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS MECHANICAL UPGRADESKODIAK, ALASKA35% DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATEHMS Project No.: 20099PAGE 27DATE: 10/9/202009 - ELECTRICAL MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL TOTALQUANTITY UNIT RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL UNIT RATE MATERIAL/LABOR091 - Demolition$ $ $ $ $ $MAINTENANCE BUILDINGDemolish main distribution electrical panel,including feeders1 EA 1150.00 1,150 1150.00 1,150 Remove subpanel1 EA 450.00 450 450.00 450 Demolish feeders (assumed) 90 LF 2.10 189 2.10 189 Demolish interior light fixture 6 EA 55.00 330 55.00 330 Disconnect motor and equipment 4 EA 95.00 380 95.00 380 Demolish conduit and wiring 150 LF 3.50 525 3.50 525 Demolish receptacle1 EA 25.00 25 25.00 25 Demolish junction box2 EA 40.00 80 40.00 80 Dispose debris1 LD 250.00 250 350.00 350 600.00 600 SUBTOTAL:$ 750 $ 13,195 $ 13,945 Labor Premium Time 16.70%2,204 2,204 SUBTOTAL:$ 750 $ 15,399 $ 16,149 Subcontractor's Overhead and Profit on Materialand Labor20.00% 150 3,080 3,230 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST:$ 900 $ 18,479 $ 19,379 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 209 of 219 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ADMIN AND MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS MECHANICAL UPGRADESKODIAK, ALASKA35% DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATEHMS Project No.: 20099PAGE 28DATE: 10/9/202009 - ELECTRICAL MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL TOTALQUANTITY UNIT RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL UNIT RATE MATERIAL/LABOR092 - Service and Distribution$ $ $ $ $ $ADMIN BUILDING250 amp main service disconnect 1 EA 1900.00 1,900 750.00 750 2650.00 2,650 250 amp CT can with meter base, weatherproof 1 EA 1230.00 1,230 450.00 450 1680.00 1,680 250 amp automatic transfer switch 1 EA 3600.00 3,600 650.00 650 4250.00 4,250 250 amp, 208/120 volt, 3 phase maindistribution panel1 EA 4125.00 4,125 2540.00 2,540 6665.00 6,665 100 amp, 208/120 volt, 3 phase subpanel with42 circuits (assumed)1 EA 1750.00 1,750 1250.00 1,250 3000.00 3,000 75 KVA, 208/120 volt transformer 1 EA 2925.00 2,925 1525.00 1,525 4450.00 4,450 3" diameter rigid steel conduit 50 LF 26.00 1,300 28.00 1,400 54.00 2,700 1 1/4" diameter rigid steel conduit 32 LF 7.50 240 12.00 384 19.50 624 #350 KCMIL copper conductor 200 LF 10.50 2,100 4.00 800 14.50 2,900 #1/0 XHHW copper conductor 50 LF 3.25 163 2.50 125 5.75 288 #3 XHHW copper conductor 128 LF 2.00 256 1.60 205 3.60 461 #8 bare copper ground 32 LF 0.50 16 1.00 32 1.50 48 Equipment grounding1 LOT 350.00 350 600.00 600 950.00 950 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 210 of 219 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ADMIN AND MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS MECHANICAL UPGRADESKODIAK, ALASKA35% DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATEHMS Project No.: 20099PAGE 29DATE: 10/9/202009 - ELECTRICAL MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL TOTALQUANTITY UNIT RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL UNIT RATE MATERIAL/LABOR092 - Service and Distribution$ $ $ $ $ $ADMIN BUILDING (Continued)Grounding connection (assumed) 7 EA 65.00 455 85.00 595 150.00 1,050 Test and tag service1 LOT 250.00 250 500.00 500 750.00 750 MAINTENANCE BUILDINGPanel F: 250 amp, 208/120 volt, 3 phase subpanelwith 42 circuits6 EA 3200.00 19,200 1980.00 11,880 5180.00 31,080 250 amp automatic transfer switch 1 EA 3600.00 3,600 650.00 650 4250.00 4,250 Conduit and Wiring (Assumed)3" diameter rigid steel conduit 45 LF 26.00 1,170 28.00 1,260 54.00 2,430 1 1/4" diameter rigid steel conduit 20 LF 7.50 150 12.00 240 19.50 390 #350 KCMIL copper conductor 180 LF 10.50 1,890 4.00 720 14.50 2,610 #1/0 XHHW copper conductor 45 LF 3.25 146 2.50 113 5.75 259 #3 XHHW copper conductor 80 LF 2.00 160 1.60 128 3.60 288 #8 bare copper ground 20 LF 0.50 10 1.00 20 1.50 30 Equipment grounding1 LOT 250.00 250 450.00 450 700.00 700 Grounding connection (assumed) 4 EA 65.00 260 85.00 340 150.00 600 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 211 of 219 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ADMIN AND MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS MECHANICAL UPGRADESKODIAK, ALASKA35% DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATEHMS Project No.: 20099PAGE 30DATE: 10/9/202009 - ELECTRICAL MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL TOTALQUANTITY UNIT RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL UNIT RATE MATERIAL/LABOR092 - Service and Distribution$ $ $ $ $ $MAINTENANCE BUILDING (Continued)MiscellaneousTest and tag service1 LOT 250.00 250 500.00 500 750.00 750 SUBTOTAL:$ 47,746 $ 28,107 $ 75,853 Labor Premium Time 16.70%4,694 4,694 SUBTOTAL:$ 47,746 $ 32,801 $ 80,547 Subcontractor's Overhead and Profit on Materialand Labor20.00% 9,549 6,560 16,109 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST:$ 57,295 $ 39,361 $ 96,656 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 212 of 219 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ADMIN AND MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS MECHANICAL UPGRADESKODIAK, ALASKA35% DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATEHMS Project No.: 20099PAGE 31DATE: 10/9/202009 - ELECTRICAL MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL TOTALQUANTITY UNIT RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL UNIT RATE MATERIAL/LABOR093 - Lighting and Power$ $ $ $ $ $ADMIN BUILDINGFixturesType A: 4'0" linear LED fixture, 5,000 LM 6 EA 147.00 882 110.00 660 257.00 1,542 PowerFractional single phase motor connection 4 EA 50.00 200 75.00 300 125.00 500 3 HP, three phase motor connection 2 EA 120.00 240 190.00 380 310.00 620 Manual disconnect switch 1 EA 155.00 155 75.00 75 230.00 230 Fused disconnect1 EA 125.00 125 75.00 75 200.00 200 Non-fused disconnect1 EA 110.00 110 75.00 75 185.00 185 Fractional motor starter switch 7 EA 45.00 315 50.00 350 95.00 665 Junction box5 EA 10.00 50 25.00 125 35.00 175 Conduit and Wiring1" diameter EMT conduit 60 LF 2.50 150 9.50 570 12.00 720 3/4" diameter EMT conduit 120 LF 1.60 192 9.00 1,080 10.60 1,272 1/2" diameter EMT conduit 100 LF 1.20 120 7.00 700 8.20 820 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 213 of 219 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ADMIN AND MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS MECHANICAL UPGRADESKODIAK, ALASKA35% DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATEHMS Project No.: 20099PAGE 32DATE: 10/9/202009 - ELECTRICAL MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL TOTALQUANTITY UNIT RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL UNIT RATE MATERIAL/LABOR093 - Lighting and Power$ $ $ $ $ $ADMIN BUILDING (Continued)Conduit and Wiring (Continued)#8 XHHW copper conductor 300 LF 0.82 246 1.05 315 1.87 561 #10 XHHW copper conductor 500 LF 0.52 260 0.85 425 1.37 685 #12 XHHW copper conductor 600 LF 0.34 204 0.65 390 0.99 594 MiscellaneousTest and tag lighting and power 1 LOT 150.00 150 450.00 450 600.00 600 Electrical mobilization/demobilization,submittals, meetings, etc. 1 LOT 1000.00 1,000 2500.00 2,500 3500.00 3,500 MAINTENANCE BUILDINGFixturesType A: 4'0" linear LED fixture, 5,000 LM 6 EA 147.00 882 110.00 660 257.00 1,542 PowerFractional single phase motor connection 2 EA 50.00 100 75.00 150 125.00 250 Fractional three phase motor connection 1 EA 75.00 75 110.00 110 185.00 185 Fused disconnect1 EA 125.00 125 75.00 75 200.00 200 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 214 of 219 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ADMIN AND MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS MECHANICAL UPGRADESKODIAK, ALASKA35% DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATEHMS Project No.: 20099PAGE 33DATE: 10/9/202009 - ELECTRICAL MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL TOTALQUANTITY UNIT RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL UNIT RATE MATERIAL/LABOR093 - Lighting and Power$ $ $ $ $ $MAINTENANCE BUILDING (Continued)Power (Continued)Fractional motor starter switch 5 EA 45.00 225 50.00 250 95.00 475 Junction box3 EA 10.00 30 25.00 75 35.00 105 Conduit and Wiring1" diameter EMT conduit 40 LF 2.50 100 9.50 380 12.00 480 3/4" diameter EMT conduit 90 LF 1.60 144 1.60 144 3.20 288 1/2" diameter EMT conduit 70 LF 1.20 84 1.20 84 2.40 168 #8 XHHW copper conductor 200 LF 0.82 164 1.05 210 1.87 374 #10 XHHW copper conductor 350 LF 0.52 182 0.85 298 1.37 480 #12 XHHW copper conductor 450 LF 0.34 153 0.65 293 0.99 446 MiscellaneousTest and tag lighting and power 1 LOT 150.00 150 450.00 450 600.00 600 Electrical mobilization/demobilization,submittals, meetings, etc. 1 LOTWith Admin Building SUBTOTAL:$ 6,813 $ 11,649 $ 18,462 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 215 of 219 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ADMIN AND MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS MECHANICAL UPGRADESKODIAK, ALASKA35% DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATEHMS Project No.: 20099PAGE 34DATE: 10/9/202009 - ELECTRICAL MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL TOTALQUANTITY UNIT RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL UNIT RATE MATERIAL/LABOR093 - Lighting and Power$ $ $ $ $ $Labor Premium Time 16.70%1,945 1,945 SUBTOTAL:$ 6,813 $ 13,594 $ 20,407 Subcontractor's Overhead and Profit on Materialand Labor20.00% 1,363 2,719 4,082 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST:$ 8,176 $ 16,313 $ 24,489 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 216 of 219 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ADMIN AND MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS MECHANICAL UPGRADESKODIAK, ALASKA35% DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATEHMS Project No.: 20099PAGE 35DATE: 10/9/202012 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL TOTALQUANTITY UNIT RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL UNIT RATE MATERIAL/LABOR$ $ $ $ $ $Mobilization and demobilization 1 LS 1500.00 1,500 3000.00 3,000 4500.00 4,500 Incidental freight6 TONS 400.00 2,400 50.00 300 450.00 2,700 Superintendent/working foreman 3 MOS 150.00 450 6500.00 19,500 6650.00 19,950 Field engineering10 HRS 95.00 950 95.00 950 Quality control (part time) 3 MOS 150.00 450 3850.00 11,550 4000.00 12,000 Scheduling and estimating (part time) 3 MOS 250.00 750 3250.00 9,750 3500.00 10,500 Expediting (part time)3 MOS 150.00 450 3200.00 9,600 3350.00 10,050 Clerical (minimal)3 MOS 150.00 450 1700.00 5,100 1850.00 5,550 Site offices (not required) 0 MO 425.00 175.00 600.00 Staging areas, signs, temporary toilets, etc. 3 MOS 450.00 1,350 200.00 600 650.00 1,950 Temporary barriers, protection, dust control, etc. 1 LOT 500.00 500 750.00 750 1250.00 1,250 Communications3 MOS 400.00 1,200 400.00 1,200 Pickups and trucks3 MOS 1800.00 5,400 500.00 1,500 2300.00 6,900 Hand tools, man lifts, ladders etc. 3 MOS 750.00 2,250 750.00 2,250 Consumables: fuel, cleaning products, safety equipment etc.3 MOS 1800.00 5,400 1800.00 5,400 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 217 of 219 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ADMIN AND MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS MECHANICAL UPGRADESKODIAK, ALASKA35% DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATEHMS Project No.: 20099PAGE 36DATE: 10/9/202012 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL TOTALQUANTITY UNIT RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL UNIT RATE MATERIAL/LABOR$ $ $ $ $ $Submittals and as-builts1 LOT 300.00 300 1750.00 1,750 2050.00 2,050 Special inspections1 LOT 1750.00 1,750 1750.00 1,750 Regular clean-up3 MOS 150.00 450 850.00 2,550 1000.00 3,000 Final clean-up1 LOT 200.00 200 1500.00 1,500 1700.00 1,700 Permits1 LOTBy Owner Plan check fees1 LOT 1250.00 1,250 1250.00 1,250 State of Alaska Dept. of Labor filing fee 1 LOT 5000.00 5,000 5000.00 5,000 Travel round trip from Anchorage (assume 50%imported crew)10 RT 350.00 3,500 350.00 3,500 Per diem (assume 50% imported crew) 200 MD 180.00 36,000 180.00 36,000 SUBTOTAL:$ 71,000 $ 68,400 $ 139,400 Home Office3.25%22,986 Overhead and Profit 10.00%73,026 Bonds 1.15%9,238 Insurances1.25%10,156 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST:$ 254,806 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 218 of 219 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ADMIN AND MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS MECHANICAL UPGRADESKODIAK, ALASKA35% DESIGN SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATEHMS Project No.: 20099PAGE 37DATE: 10/9/202013 - CONTINGENCIES MATERIAL LABOR TOTAL TOTALQUANTITY UNIT RATE TOTAL RATE TOTAL UNIT RATE MATERIAL/LABOR$ $ $ $ $ $131 - ESTIMATOR'S CONTINGENCYThe estimator's allowance for architectural andengineering requirements that are not apparentat an early level of design documentation 10.00%$ 82,268 Unique market risk 3.50%$ 31,673 132 - ESCALATION CONTINGENCYThe allowance for escalation from the date ofestimate to the proposed bid date of spring 2021at the rate of 3.50% per annum (5 months) 1.46%$ 13,675 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST:$ 127,616 AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Borough Building - Repairs And Required Maintenance. Funding Of Borough ... Page 219 of 219 1KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH rr Meeting Type: �� C� �SSLbN Date: J2, E -tk &MA- . Please PRINT your name legibly Please PRINT vour name legibly Borough Assembly Work Session Attendance Sm' Williams