Tab_200Birch Horton Bittner & Cherot
a pro1ssional corporation
Respond to Anchorage Office
T 907.263.7226 9 F 907.276.3680
November 3, 2016
Mayor and City Council Members
City of Nome
P. 0. Box 281
Nome, Alaska 99762
Board of Directors
Alaska Municipal Bond Bank
Department of Revenue
333 Willoughby Avenue, II th Floor
Juneau, Alaska 99811
RBC Capital Markets, LLC
Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 2100
San Francisco, California 94111
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We have acted as Bond Counsel in connection with the issuance by the City of Nome,
Alaska (the "Issuer"), of its $650,000 General Obligation Refunding Bond, 2016 Series A (the
"Bond"). We have examined the law and such certified proceedings and other papers as we
deem necessary to render this opinion.
The Bond is authorized by Resolution R-16-09-03 (the "Resolution") of the Issuer,
adopted September 12, 2016. The Bond is issued under a Loan Agreement dated as of
November 15, 2000, as amended by an Amendatory Loan Agreement dated as of January 1,
2007, and as amended by an Amendatory Loan Agreement dated October 18, 2016 (together,
the "Loan Agreement") between the Issuer and the Alaska Municipal Bond Bank (the "Bond
Bank").
The Bond is registered in form, is dated November 3, 2016, matures on December 1 in
each of the years in the respective principal amounts, and bears interest at the rates, as follows:
Year Principal Amount Interest Rate Year Principal Amount Interest Rate
2016 $ 10,000.00 2.00% 2019 $165,000.00 4.00%
2017 150,000.00 2.00 2020 165,000.00 4.00
2018 160,000.00 4.00
The Bond shall bear interest from its date payable on December 1, 2016 and semi-
annually thereafter on June 1 and December 1 in each year. The Bond is not subject to optional
redemption prior to maturity.
1127 West Seventh Ave., Anchorage, AK 99501-3301 1156 15th St, NW., Ste. 1020, Washington, D.C. 20005-1754
T 907.276.1550 • 800.478.1550 • F 907.276.3680 T 202.659.5800 • F 202.659.1027
Birch Horton Bittner & Cherot
a pro/ksiona1 Corporation
November 3, 2016
Page 2 of 2
As to questions of fact material to our opinion, we have relied upon the certified
proceedings and other certifications of publk officials furnished to us without undertaking to
verify the same by independent investigation.
Based upon the foregoing, we are of the opinion that, under existing law:
1. The Bond is the valid and legally binding general obligation of the Issuer for the
payment of the principal and interest of which the Issuer has the power and is obligated to levy
taxes upon all taxable property in the City of Nome without limitation as to rate or amount and
for the payment of which the full faith and credit of the Issuer are pledged.
2. The Loan Agreement has been duly authorized, executed, and delivered by, and
constitutes a binding agreement in accordance with its terms of, the Issuer, except as the
enforcement thereof may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium, or
other laws affecting the enforcement of creditors' rights generally, or general principles of equity.
3. The interest on the Bond is excluded from gross income for federal income tax
purposes and is not an item of tax preference for purposes of the federal alternative minimum
tax imposed on individuals and corporations; however, interest on the Bond is taken into
account in determining adjusted current earnings for the purpose of computing alternative
minimum tax under Section 55 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code"). The opinion
set forth in the preceding sentence is subject to the conditions that the Issuer comply with all
requirements of the Code that must be satisfied subsequent to the issuance of the Bond in order
that interest thereon be, or continue to be, excluded from gross income for federal income tax
purposes. The Issuer has covenanted to comply with each such requirement. Failure to comply
with certain of such requirements may cause the inclusion of interest on the Bond in gross
income for federal income tax purposes to be retroactive to the date of issuance of the Bond.
We express no opinion regarding other federal tax consequences arising with respect to the
Bond.
Sincerely,
BIRCH HORTON BITTNER & CHEROT
H -