KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH LANDFILL SUB LT 1B - ZCP 3/31/2015Kodiak Island Borough Print Form Submit by Email
s. Community Development Department
-1 710 Mill Bay Rd. Rm 205
Kodiak AK 99615
Ph. (907) 486 - 9363 Fax (907) 486 - 9396
http://www.kodiakak.us TBD
Zoning Compliance Permit Permit No. BZ 2015-081
The following information is to be supplied by the Applicant:
Property Owner / Applicant: KIB/City of Kodiak (Mark Kozak)
Mailing Address: PO Box 1397 Kodiak, AK 99615
Phone Number: 486-8060
Other Contact email, etc.: mkozak@city.kodiak.ak.us
Legal Description: Subdv: Lot 1B, KIB Landfill Subdivision Block: Lot: 16
Street Address:
Use & Size of Existing Structures: City of Kodiak Composting site - operating under a temporary use license.
Description of Proposed Action: Establish a Class A composting facility in accordance with ADEC permits. Improvements include a 50'
x 70' covered structure over the mixing area, composting bins, biofilter, electrical room and office, mixing bunker, and associated site
improvements, as depicted on site plan Sheet C-3, addendum no. 4, prepared by CH2MHILL. this use is a permitted use in I -Industrial
zoning.
Site Plan to include: Lot boundaries and existing easements, existing buildings, proposed location of new construction, access points,
and vehicular parking areas.
Staff Compliance Review: Current Zoning: Industrial _ KIBC 17.105 PROP_ID TBD'
Lot Area: 3.45 acres Lot Width: 75' Bld'g Height: N/A
Front Yard: 50, Rear Yard: 20' Side Yard: 20'
Prk'g Plan Rvw? Yes # of Req'd Spaces: 3
Staff Compliance Review Notes:
Plat / Subdivision Requirements? City submitted a technical memorandum addressing odor control to demonstrate compliance
w/ KIBC 17.105.060 D, which has been reviewed and approved. City has submitted application for P&Z approval of fencing, to demon-
strate compliance with KIBC 17.105.060.060 F
Subd Case No. 515-014 Plat No. 2015-7 Bld'g Permit No. TBD
Does the project involve NO
an EPA defined facility? _
Driveway
Permit?
Septic Plan
Approval:
Fire
Marshall:
State permit # 24329 issued 12/2/14
Porta Potty service
N/A
If YES, do you have an EPA Return Receipt of N / A
Notification?
"Permit will not be issued until receipt is submitted to
Applicant Certification: I hereby certify that 1 will comply with the provisions of the Kodiak Island Borough Code and that I
have the authority to certify this as the property owner, or as a representative of the property owner. I agree to have identifiable
corner markers in place for verification of building setback (yard) requirements.
Attachments? tits List Other: S
iT
Date: 3 r �' Signature: �Q
This permit is only for the proposed project as described by the applicant. If there are any changes to the
proposed project, including its intended use, prior to or during its siting, construction, or operation, contact
this office immediately to determine if further review and approval of the revised project is necessary.
THIS FORM DOES NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION WHEN A BUILDING PERMIT IS REQUIRED.
** EXPIRATION: A zoning compliance permit will become null and void if the building or use authorized by such permit is not
commenced within 180 days from the date of issuance, or if the building construction or use is abandoned at any time, after the
work is commenced, for a period of 180 days. Before such work can be recommenced, a new permit must first be obtained. (Sec.
106.4.4 Expiration. 1997 UBC) per KIBC 17.13.060 A.**
CDD Staff Certification
Date: 3 ,�� at y CDD Staff: d4L
Payment Verification Zoning Compliance Permit Fee Payable in Cashier's Office Room # 104 - Main floor of Borough Building
After -the -Fact 2X the published amount
Not Applicable F— $0.00 Os t��;0 F— $0.00
Less than 1.75 acres: F- $30.00 PAID (— $60.00
1.76 to 5.00 acres: C $60.00 r $120.00
5.01 to 40.00 acres: F $90.00 3 1 r $180.00
40.01 acres or more: $12 $240.00
BIAK ISLAND BORODUH
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
y CITY OF KODIAK
2410 Mill Bay Road Kodiak AK 99615
Public Works Department
rr' (907) 486-8060 Fax: (907) 486-8066
March 27, 2015
Mr. Robert Pederson, Community Development Director
710 Mill Bay Road, Room 205
Kodiak AK 99615
Subject: Title 17.105.060, Odor
Dear Mr. Pederson:
During discussions with Kodiak Island Borough (KIB) Community Development Staff about the
Zoning Compliance permit for the City of Kodiak's Composting Facility, we reviewed KIB
Code, section 17.105.060, D, Odor, Item F, Open Storage and Item G Screening.
I am writing to address KIB Code 17.105.060, Item D regarding odor. The CH2MHILL
compost designer engineer has been designing composting facilities all across the country for
over 30 years and has stressed the importance of the need to complete the modeling to assure we
are managing potential odors. The design engineer required us to complete a full odor model to
determine if there were any concerns.
I have included the complete technical memo of the odor modeling, which includes the results of
that modeling. The model indicates less than 0.1 percent of the time over the course of year
(approximately 9 hours) that the odor would be detectable on or across the highway from the
facility.
Please let me know if you need any additional information.
Sincerely,
AAA�Z_.
Mark Kozak
Public Works Director
Enclosure: Copy of the complete technical memo
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM CH2MHILLe
Kodiak Composting Facility Odor Dispersion
Modeling -Technical Memorandum
PREPARED FOR: City of Kodiak
PREPARED BY: Matthew Ward and Todd Williams/CH2M HILL
COPY To: CH2M HILL Project File
DATE: July 11, 2014
PROJECT NUMBER: 478123.03.SA.03
Introduction
The City of Kodiak Alaska (City) is installing a composting facility at the Kodiak Island Borough Landfill. The
facility will process municipal biosolids into Class A exceptional quality compost compliant with all U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC)
permit requirements.
The composting facility being designed has a capacity to process on average 55 cubic yards biosolids per
week. The composting process will occur in covered continuously aerated negative aeration bunkers, with
the resulting foul air stream being captured and treated using an organic media biofilter. Biofiltration has
been determined to be Best Available Control Technology (SACT) for biosolids composting in several air
pollution control districts in the United States. Because continuous aeration of compost piles will be
practiced, approximately 95% of all compost odors will be captured for treatment through the biofilter.
Atmospheric dispersion modeling was completed to quantify potential odor impacts due to the composting
operation on the surrounding community.
The biosolids receiving building will be used to receive biosolids cake from the City's biosolids dewatering
facility and blend it with bulking agent for composting in covered compost bunkers. Because material will be
processed through this building only intermittently and previous studies at other facilities have shown this
portion of the overall process to be a localized odor source, this building is not considered to be a potential
offsite odor impact. This technical memorandum documents the methodology and atmospheric dispersion
modeling results to predict the impact of odors emitted from the planned composting operation.
Atmospheric Dispersion Modeling
Dispersion Model Selection and Overview
Locations downwind of odor sources can be negatively impacted by odors. The amount of impact is
governed not only by the odor source mass emission rate but also dispersion downwind of sources. Source
geometry, terrain, wind speed and direction, solar radiation/adsorption, atmospheric mixing height, and
surface roughness all influence odor trajectory and dispersion of odors as they migrate from their source
and potentially impact people at receptor locations (such as residences or businesses) offsite. Atmospheric
dispersion models are designed to account for these influences and estimate concentration, duration, and
frequency of impacts given specified source emission data. Dispersion modeling provides an improved
understanding of the relative risk of creating offsite odor impacts caused by multiple sources acting
together.
The model selected for this assessment was AERMOD, the current U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) standard for demonstrating Clean Air Act compliance. While odor is not regulated by the Clean Air Act,
ES08191309161 ATL
KODIAK COMPOSTING FACILITY ODOR DISPERSION MODELING -TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
AERMOD is the industry standard used in odor -impact risk assessments. AERMOD is a Gaussian plume
model that uses the boundary layer turbulence theory to calculate pollutant mass distribution from the
plume center line. Previous industry standard models (i.e., Industrial Source Complex Model) used empirical
relationships between pollutant mass distribution and atmospheric stability class categories. Gaussian puff
models such as CALPLIFF also are commonly used to predict pollutant dispersion. However, puff models are
more suited to tracking the long-range pollutant trajectory and fate resulting from release events. AERMOD
is the most appropriate model for assessing the ongoing risk of odor impacts to receptors located near
continuously emitting sources such as composting operations. AERMOD tracks plume interaction with
terrain, accounts for building downwash (wake) effects, and has been validated for downwind impact
projections such as are relevant to this evaluation.
AERMOD (or other Gaussian plume models) has no provision for calibration in terms of adjusting a rate
parameter. The model itself is already calibrated per EPA guidance; hence model adjustment algorithms are
not allowed. As such, AERMOD's predictive accuracy is dependent on the degree to which the input data
correspond to actual conditions. In setting up the model a rigorous effort was made to obtain input data
defining the odor sources as accurately as possible. Absolute predictive accuracy is beyond what should be
expected or needed for odor risk assessments. Rather, the model is an excellent tool for assessing the
relative risk of offsite impacts due to different sources, source configurations, and climactic conditions. For
this evaluation, the model was set up and run using the most complete and appropriate data available. Each
model component and corresponding input database is described in the following subsection.
Dispersion Model Components and Input Data
AERMOD coordinates several data component interaction using five ancillary pre-processing tools. Required
input components include the following:
• Source characterization
— Source emission rates
— Concentration peaking/averaging duration
— Source type and geometry
• Terrain characterization
— Receptor array
— Digital Elevation Model (DEM) or National Elevation Dataset (NED) terrain files
• Land use characterization
— Airport land use sector designations
— Onsite building dimensions
• Meteorological characterization
— Airport surface meteorological observations
— Airport upper air soundings
— National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) 1 -minute Automated Surface Observing System (ASOS)
observations
• Offsite odor threshold and frequency targets
— Model control options
— Model output options
Figure 1 illustrates the interaction between AERMOD, input data, pre-processing tools, and output results.
The following subsections describe each input component in detail.
ES081913091617ATL
c
0
0
v
u N
c
o
m
o v
dO
c
L
0
Y
CL y,
4)
a
cc d
v i
Q n1 Q
fD U
O Fro u m U'
N
C
O_
CN
c
a E
CD C1
N
v
vc
U C
lO d
KODIAK COMPOSTING FACILITY ODOR DISPERSION MODELING -TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Source Data Inputs
Source data must be characterized to account for odor concentration, volumetric air emissions (or
equivalent air emission rate), source geometry (source location, emitting surface area, release height, and
shape), source type, and averaging period. Odor emission rates were determined based on typical
concentrations measured from similar sources and planned process air flow rates. The following
assumptions were used to characterize odor emission rates:
• Maximum biofilter Air Flow Rate (process air plus dilution air) = 7,200 cubic feet per minute (cfm)
Biofilter Exhaust Concentration = 300 D/T (The dilution -to -threshold ratio or D/T is a measure of the
number of dilutions needed to make the odorous ambient air "non-detectable.") This number is based
on data from similar composting operations.
• Aerated Static Pile Composting Pile and Cure Pile Odor Emission Rate = 0.27 odor unit per second per
square meter (OU/s/mz). This is the portion of odor emissions that can escape from the negative
aeration process into the ambient surroundings. It represents 5% of odors generated from the
composting process and is based upon testing performed at similarly designed and operated biosolids
composting facilities. The other 95% of emissions is directed to the biofilter for treatment.
The biofilter air emission rates are based on process air flow volume plus dilution air needed to control
biofilter inlet temperatures. The concentration is based on what has been demonstrated to be achievable at
other biosolids composting facilities. The aerated static pile unit area emission rate is based on
measurements made at a similar biosolids composting facility. The emission rate accounts for some escaping
odors with most of the odors are captured as a result of the piles being ventilated under negative pressure.
The unit area emission rate was then assigned to the operating piles.
AERMOD can model three types of odor sources: point, area, and volume. Point sources are those from
which odor emissions are released in a concentrated and localized form, such as from odor control
equipment exhaust stacks. For point sources, the release height, air vertical velocity, and temperature, must
be characterized. Volume sources are those from which odors are released in a diffuse, three-dimensional
form, such as vents or open doors on the side of a building or structure that release fugitive emissions. For
volume sources, the associated building or structure determines the plume dimensions at the point of
release. Area sources are those having a large horizontal surface from which emissions are released.
Emissions from area sources can either have an initial upward velocity, or emissions related to mass transfer
across the air/liquid or air/solid interface. Figure 2 illustrates the three source types.
For all three source types (point, area, and volume) release height is a key parameter and is based on the
source elevation and geometry. Plume dispersion is highly influenced by initial release height. For point
sources and some area sources, odor emissions have an initial upward velocity, hence the release height is
the elevation above ground level at which the odor plume begins to move horizontally with the wind. For
volume sources release height is usually one half of the associated building or structure height. The biofilter
was modeled as an area source. Since the biofilter treated air has an upward velocity and buoyancy
(because it is warmer than the ambient air), it could be modeled as a point source to account for dispersion
related to the upward velocity and air buoyancy. However, modeling as an area source is more conservative,
with respect to offsite impacts, because the area source assumption neglects plume rise. Therefore,
modeling as an area source results in higher predicted impacts compared with a point source. The covered
aerated static pile and aerated cure pile bunkers were modeled as an area source. The biosolids receiving
building was assumed to not be an offsite odor source as biosolids are not stored, but are processed as soon
as they are received, and that only 2-3 days per week.
ES081913091617ATL
a)
U
i
O
c
.O
CL
E
s
v
c
r
ii
KODIAK COMPOSTING FACILITY ODOR DISPERSION MODELING -TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Terrain Inputs
AERMOD calculates plume interactions with topography and accounts for obstacles caused by hills, ridges,
and other steep terrain elements. Topographic elevation data were obtained from the U.S. Geological
Survey (USGS) in the form of National Elevation Dataset (NED) files for the composting site and surrounding
region.
A receptor array was defined across the site and surrounding region to account for any potential odor
impacts. Receptor density was increased near sources and spread out farther away to manage computing
resources. The receptor grid was distributed over an area approximately one mile square. When the model
was run, concentration values were calculated for every receptor for every source or group of sources for
every hour in the selected year.
Land Use Inputs
The AERMOD model considers atmospheric boundary layer turbulence associated with landscape
roughness. To characterize this roughness land use categories were ascribed to every distinct wind direction
sector. Examples include low density suburban development, open water, rural grassland, and high density
urban. Detailed land use data were obtained from the USGS maps.
Meteorological Data Inputs
Meteorological data were obtained from the Kodiak Benny Benson State Airport, which is the nearest
meteorological station that maintains records on all the required model input parameters. The state airport
is located approximately 5 miles southwest of the compost site on the same side of Kodiak Island. The
airport's proximity to the site means that the airport meteorological data can be assumed to be
representative of compost site conditions for dispersion modeling purposes.
Airport surface meteorological parameters were measured and logged at hourly intervals for every hour of
the year. Airport data were preprocessed for use in AERMOD and then modeling was completed using
hourly averaging, the highest resolution typically available from airport weather stations including Kodiak.
Required surface parameters include 10 -meter wind speed (measured at 10 meters from the ground), wind
direction, air temperature, solar radiation, albedo (fraction of solar radiation absorbed by the ground), and
Bowen ratio (fraction of solar radiation converted to evaporation). In addition to surface weather
parameters, upper air data are needed to determine the atmospheric mixing height (inversion layer
elevation). These were obtained from weather balloon soundings performed twice daily by the Kodiak
airport.
Meteorological data from five recent years, 2008 to 2012, were screened and compared. The model was run
for each of the five years and the year with the highest resulting offsite impacts was selected. All five years
resulted in similar odor impacts, but 2010 had the highest offsite impacts and was selected for this
assessment.
The meteorological data files are as complete as possible using the latest available tools and EPA guidance
for AERMOD. Calculating the impact for each source, at every receptor, over the selected design year (2010)
gives a high probability of producing the worst-case conditions, thereby accurately projecting the relative
risk of the planned composting facility to create an offsite impact.
Offsite Odor Threshold and Frequency Targets
For dispersion modeling results to be meaningful, they should be evaluated in the context of what is
typically perceivable by the public. Whereas, odors of 1 D/T are theoretically perceivable, in the ambient
environment odors are usually not noticed above background until they are between approximately 5 and
10 D/T, with 7 D/T being a typical threshold at which the public becomes aware of odors. Many odor control
practitioners indicate that odors tend to become a nuisance at 15 D/T, although the frequency that odors
are perceived, the concentration at which they are present, and the combination of frequency and
concentration determine whether the odors represents a problem. On this basis, a target value should be
selected based on the City's goals and risk sensitivity. A higher target D/T results in less required odor
ES081913091617ATL
KODIAK COMPOSTING FACILITY ODOR DISPERSION MODELING -TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
control measures but greater risk of offsite odor problems. A lower target D/T results in greater controls but
less risk of offsite odor problems. Selecting a target of 1 D/T or below is not advisable as such a target is
often not attainable (or needed) at any cost. Table 1 lists offsite impact targets either successfully
implemented at other locations or dictated by local codes where they exist.
TABLE 1
Selected Odor Goals and Criteria in the United States
Location
Offsite Standard
or Guideline
Averaging Time and/or Frequency
San Francisco Bay Area Air Quality Management District.
5 D/T
Applied after at least 10 complaints within 90 days
Brightwater (Seattle, Wash.) WWTP
5 D/T
5 minutes
Cincinnati (Ohio) WWTP
7 D/T
3 -minute average, 99% compliance
Colorado
8 D/T
Short-term field measurement
Dublin San Ramon Services District, Dublin, California
4 D/T
1 -hour, 99% compliance
EBMUD, Oakland, California
5 D/T
1 hour, 99% compliance
Fairfax, Virginia
7 D/T
1 hour, 100% compliance, 3 minutes, 99% compliance
Kentucky
7 D/T
Short-term field measurement
Massachusetts
5 D/T
1 hour (Equates to about 15 D/T for 3 minutes)
Missouri
7 D/T
Short-term field measurement
Nevada
9 D/T
1 hour
New Jersey
5 D/T
5 minutes or less
Orange County, California
15 D/T
3 minutes
San Diego WWTP
5 D/T
5 minutes, 99.5% compliance
Virginia Initiative Plant, Hampton Roads Sanitation District
2 D/T
1 hour, 100% compliance
7 D/T
3 minutes, 99.9% compliance
WWTP = wastewater treatment plant
D/T = Dilution to threshold ratio
Based on historical experiences and current priorities, a target criterion of 7 D/T, not to be exceeded offsite
during more than one percent of the time, should represent a successful offsite odor condition from the
compost operation. At this recommended D/T offsite odor impacts are not expected.
Dispersion Modeling Results
The dispersion model was run, concentrations were calculated for each hour of the year and hours
exceeding 7 D/T were tallied for the area in the vicinity of the planned compost site extending outward in a
grid 3000 meters in every direction. The results were then converted for presentation of the threshold
criteria (offsite exceedances of 7 D/T offsite no more than one percent of the time) as an isopleth map.
Figure 3 presents odor combined impact results emitted from the planned composting operation and
biofilter.
ES081913091617ATL 7
KODIAK COMPOSTING FACILITY ODOR DISPERSION MODELING -TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
FIGURE 3
Projected Frequency of Exceedances of 7 D/T for the Planned Kodiak Composting Facility Due to All Sources
Combined
As shown in Figure 3 concentrations of 7 D/T or higher beyond the property boundary, slightly across the
road and not near any homes, do not occur more than 0.1 percent of hours during the year. This is about 9
hours per year. This demonstrates compliance with very rigorous offsite impact criteria and is expected to
represent successful odor control. Based on these results, for which conservative assumptions were applied,
the planned composting facility is anticipated to pose minimal risk of offsite odor impacts.
Conclusion
Atmospheric dispersion modeling was completed to evaluate the risk of causing offsite impacts with the
planned City of Kodiak Biosolids composting facility. The AERMOD model was used with local terrain and
meteorological data taken from Kodiak's State Airport. Five recent years of met data were screened and the
most conservative year (with respect to producing the highest predicted offsite concentration) was selected.
Odor source data was based on other measurements made at facilities using a similar process to the one
planned for the City. Dispersion modeling results predicted that perceptible odors would be contained
within the property boundary with a slight predicted incursion into the adjacent Monashka Bay Road far
from any residences or other potential receptors. These results indicate a minimal risk of the compost
operation causing offsite odor impacts.
ES081913091617ATL
Permit No. 24329
State of Alaska
Department of Transportation and Public Facilities
Driveway Permit #24329
This pernit allows the owner to construct and maintain a driveway
within a State owned highway Right of Way.
Owner: City of Kodiak
Mailing Address: 2410 Mill Bay Road
Kodiak, AK 99615
Driveway location (highway, address, subdivision, legal description milepost, etc.)
DAN Kodiak - 1203 Monashka Bay Road - MP 6.4
Composting Site - Kodiak Island Land Fill
Design Criteria
Driveway width
24 Feet
Road surface type
Paved
Left edge clearance
1200 Feet
Shoulder type
Gravel
Rigght edge clearance
1600 Feet
Landing surface type
Asphalt
Left return radius
40 Feet
Left driveway fore slope
4: 1
Right return radius
40 Feet
Right driveway fore lope
4: 1.
Shoulder width
4 Feet
Ditch depth
3Feet
Approach angle
90 Degrees
Culvert Type Corrugated
Metal
Landing Trade +/-
2 Percent
Culvert Diameter
IS Inches
Culvert Length
40 Feet
This permit applies only to the State right of way.
This permit grants permission for a driveway allowing access to and from your property onto a
State maintained highway. It does not permit the following within the right of way or within that
portion ofa driveway that is within the right of way: (1) Parking of vehicles "for sale"; (2)
Obstructions of any kind (i.e. logs, cables, fencing, etc.); (3) Advertising signs or banners/flags;
(4) Parking vehicles with signsladvertising on the side.
A driveway constructed under permit within a highway right-of-way is the property of the State,
but all cost and liability arising from the construction, operation, or maintenance ol'a driveway is
at the sole expense of those lands served.
Page 1 of 5
Permit No. 24329
The Department is not obligated to change its maintenance practices to accommodate a driveway
constructed under a permit, or to incur any additional expense removing snow berms or other
obstructions from a driveway within a right of way resulting from the Department's activities, or
activities under a permit issued under 17 AAC 15.
Owner is responsible for adjusting or relocating the driveway without cost or liability to the
Department if the use or safety of the highway requires that the driveway be adjusted or relocated.
This permit is not a property right but a temporary authorization, revocable by the State upon
violation of any permit terms or conditions, or for other reasons. All reasonable attorney's fees
and costs associated with legal or enforcement actions related to the terms and conditions of this
permit will be borne by the Owner.
Any survey monument or monument accessory that is disturbed or destroyed during construction
or maintenance of the driveway will be restored or replaced by a Land Surveyor licensed in the
State of Alaska.
The Owner will be responsible for all necessary Federal, State, and Municipal permits and
licenses required by law, pay all taxes and special assessments lawfully imposed upon the
permitted area, and pay other fees and charges assessed under applicable law.
Placement of fill material in waters of the U.S., including wetlands and streams, requires prior
authorization from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. It is the responsibility of the owner to
contact the Corps before filling activities take place.
The Owner shall construct and maintain a driveway in such a manner that the highway, and all of
the highway's appurtenances or facilities, including drainage facilities, pipes, culverts, ditches,
traffic control devices, street lights, pathways, and sidewalks are not impaired or endangered in
any way by the construction or maintenance. If you damage any improvements within the State
owned right of way, you will be responsible for returning them to their previous condition. The
Department will inspect and approve the restored improvements.
Owner will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless die State, and its officers, employees, and
contractors, front any and all claims or actions resulting from injury, death, loss, or damage
sustained by any person or personal property resulting directly or indirectly from Owner's use of
or activities in the permitted area.
Landings fi•om all paved roads must be paved and maintained from edge of the road to the length
of the landing as stipulated in this pen -nit.
If a culvert is required by this driveway pennit, culvert must be maintained continuously by the
owner.
No person shall place, leave, or deposit upon any street, avenue, alley, sidewalk, or other public
right of way any snob' or ice which has been removed froni a pi -Nate driveway, private pal king
area, or the adjacent property. Owner is responsible for contractor's actions concerning placement
of snow from Owner's property.
Page 2 of 5
Permit No. 24329
If driveway construction or maintenance interferes with the public's safety and/or use of facilities
within State owned right of way, you will be directed to stop work until adjustments are made.
While doing construction or maintenance activities do not park equipment or stockpile material
on the shoulder during non -working hours.
Owner is responsible for sight distance clearing of brush and obstructions adjacent to their
property
Contact the Department for information about acceptable driveway markers (i.e., size, materials,
distance, etc.) for placement within the right of way.
Attachments included as part of this permit are:
C Site Plans
I, Glenn Melvin, acknowledge and accept that City of Kodiak will comply with all the provisions
and conditions that the Department of Transportation and Public Facilities has included as a
condition of issuing this permit.
Owner Signature
DOT PF Signature
Page 3 of 5
Date
WVIY
Date
yi
a
41�
�
�
|
/
��
.��
| \� |��\�
.�
\ �
��
\
�,
a
Kozak, Mark
From: Mullican, Jim
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 1:13 PM
To: Kozak, Mark; Mathers, Doug
Cc: Bud.Alto@CH2M.com
Subject: RE: Composting Facility Fire Marshall Overview Document
Good Afternoon Mark,
I have reviewed the material you furnished and from the fire marshal prospective I see no problem with the
requested changes I would like to visit the site as this project proceeds to evaluate my department's response for
emergencies.
Thanks,
Jim
J. R. Mullican Jr.
Fire Chief
City of Kodiak Fire Dept.
219 Lower Mill Bay Rd.
Kodiak, AK 99615
Ph# 907-486-8040 Fax 907-486-8048
Messages to and from this e-mail address may be available to the public under Kodiak City Code provisions and
Alaska State Statutes.
From: Kozak, Mark
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 4:32 PM
To: Mathers, Doug; Mullican, Jim
Cc: Bud.AltoO)CH2M.com
Subject: FW: Composting Facility Fire Marshall Overview Document
Good afternoon Doug and Jim,
Attached is the updated description of the compost facility operation. It was reviewed by the Composting
engineer to make sure the information about temperature monitoring is correct. I have also included the newest
site plan. We had to make some changes in order to keep all the excavated fill within the property.
Please let us know if you have any question.
Jim, Doug has a CD disk with the full drawing package if you need to review additional drawings.
Thank you, Mark
Mark Kozak
Public Works Director
2410 Mill Bay Road
Kodiak, AK 99615
W;907-486-8060
F;907-486-8066
mkozak �,city.kodiak.ak.us
From: Bud.Alto@CH2M.com [mailto:Bud.Alto@CH2M.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 9:31 AM
To: Kozak, Mark
Subject: Composting Facility Fire Marshall Overview Document
Mark
I have updated the document for the Fire Marshall. Please review and comment.
W01
e...c_ rw .fnsie
FOR
i
I
GH2MHILLe
SITE PLAN
Addendum No. 4
CfffOFXCOM
CoLroom FAC"M
KorA..Mw