Loading...
LEITE ADD BK 2 LT 18 - VarianceRasmus Anderson Box 2793 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Kodiak Island Borough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 May 19, 1988 RE: Case 88-019. Findings of Fact for the denial of a variance which would have permitted an existing accessory building that is located five (5) feet from the rear property line, to be remodeled into living space and connected to the existing single-family residence, to project five (5) feet into the required ten (10) foot rear yard setback in a R1—Single-Family Residential Zoning District. Portion of Lot 18, Block 2, Leite Addition; 1515 Mission Road. (Rasmus Anderson) Dear Mr. Anderson: The Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting on May 18, 1988, adopted the following findings of fact in support of their decision in the above cited matter: 1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or intended use of development, which generally do not apply to other properties in the same land use district. There are no exceptional physical conditions applicable to the intended use of development. In fact approval of this request could set a precedent to allow existing accessory buildings to be converted to dwelling units. This can be viewed as an intent to circumvent the minimum rear yard setback for residences. 2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships. Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would require that the existing building be moved five (5) feet or that the structure could not be used for residential purposes at all. This is an unnecessary hardship and practical difficulty because the lot is very small with limited areas available for a new single-family residence or additions and improvements to the existing single-family residence. Utilization of the existing structure would be more cost effective and pose fewer practical building difficulties in trying to improve or enlarge the existing single-family residence and conform to other setbacks and building separation requirements. Kodiak Island Borough Rasmus Anderson May 19, 1988 Page Two • The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare. Granting of the variance should not result in material damage or prejudice to other properties in the area. Conversion of an existing two story accessory building into living space should not create any additional impacts on nearby lots. The land use will not change. Additionally, granting of this variance will not be prejudicial to other properties in this block. Leite Addition is an old subdivision and most of the lots and structures in Block 2 are nonconforming to lot size and/or setbacks. A review of air photos indicates widespread encroachments into required setbacks within Block 2. Two other lots in the block have been granted setback variances, including a rear yard setback variance for Lot 2, Block 2, which shares a common rear corner with the applicants' lot. In essence, this request will have no more impact on adjoining properties than the current situation and no more impact than many of the other nonconforming structures in this block have on adjoining properties. 4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan which identifies this area for High Density Residential Development. This existing land use and density will not be changed as a result of this request. Additionally, high density areas often have smaller separation between structures than those found in areas designated for lower density development. 5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance. Actions of the applicant have not caused the conditions from which relief is being sought by a variance. The variance will be decided prior to conversion of the accessory building to living space. 6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the district involved. A single-family residence is a permitted land use in the R1--Single-Family Residential Zoning District. Kodiak Island Borough Rasmus Anderson May 19, 1988 Page Three If you have any questions about the action of the Commission, please contact Gordon Gould or Linda Freed of the Community Development Department. Sincerely, Patricia Miley, Secretary Community Development Department CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Show the radial bearings for the northwesterly and southwesterly corners of Lot 12 on the final plat. 2. Show the "Basis of Bearing" on the final plat. 3. Place the following note on the final plat: "Natural streams and drainage courses shall not be blocked or impeded." 4. Remove or relocate the building straddling the proposed lot line in conformance with Title 1.7 prior to filing the final plat. Relocate the gear shed on proposed Lot 12B to a lot with a main dwelling prior to filing the final plat. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. This subdivision meets the requirements of Title 16 with the technical corrections required by conditions 1 and 2. 2. The house straddling the proposed lot line does not comply with Section 17.19.040 of the Borough Code, and the gear shed on proposed Lot 12B does not comply with Section 17.51.060 of the Borough Code. VII. OLD BUSINESS A) Case 88-019. Findings of Fact for the denial of a variance which would have permitted an existing accessory building chat is located five (5) feet from rhe rear property line, to be remodeled into living space and connected to the existing single-family residence, to project five (5) feet into the required ten (IO) foot rear yard setback in a R1--Single-Family Residential Zoning District. Portion of Lot 18, Block 2, tette Addition; 1515 Mission Road. (Rasmus Anderson) COMMISSIONER KNUDSEN MOVED TO ADOPT the findings of fact contained in the staff's report dated May 10, 1988. The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll call vote. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or intended use of development, which generally do not apply to other properties in the same land use district. There are no exceptional physical conditions applicable to the intended use of development. In fact approval of this request could set a precedent to allow existing accessory buildings to be converted to dwelling units. This can be viewed as an intent to circumvent the minimum rear yard setback for residences. 2. Strict application of the zbning ordinances would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships. Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would require that the existing building be moved five (5) feet or that the structure could not be used for residential purposes at all. This is an unnecessary hardship and practical difficulty because the lot is very small with limited areas available for a new single-family residence or additions and improvements to the existing single-family residence. Utilization of the existing structure would be more cost effective and pose fewer practical building difficulties in trying to improve or enlarge the existing single-family residence and conform to other setbacks and building separation requirements. Planning & Zoning Commission 16 of 18 May 18, 1988 Minutes 3. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare. Granting of the variance should not result is material damage or prejudice to other properties in the area. Conversion of an existing two story accessory building into living space should not create any additional impacts on nearby lots. The land use will not change. Additionally, granting of this variance will not be prejudicial to other properties in this block. tette Addition is an old subdivision and most of the lots and structures in Block 2 are nonconforming to lot size and/or setbacks. A review of air photos indicates widespread encroachments into required setbacks within Block 2. Two other lots in the block have bean granted setback variances, including a rear yard setback variance for Lot 2, Block 2, which shares a common rear corner with the applicants' lot. In essence, this request will have no more impact on adjoining properties than the current situation and no more impact than many of the other nonconforming structures in this block have on adjoining properties. 4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Granting of the. variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan which identifies this area for High Density Residential Development. This existing land use and density will not be changed as a result of this request. Additionally, high density areas often have smaller separation between structures than those found in areas designated for lower density development. 5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance. Actions of the applicant have not caused the conditions from which relief is being sought by a variance. The variance will be decided prior to conversion of the accessory building to living space. 6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the district involved. A single-family residence is a permitted land use in the R1--Single-Family Residential Zoning District. B) Case S-88-004. Findings of Fact for the granting of preliminary approval for the subdivision of Lot 7, Block 1, Kodiak Townsite Alaska Subdivision, U.S. Survey 25378, to Lots 7A and 7B. (Island Properties, Inc.) COMMISSIONER KNUDSEN MOVED TO ADOPT the findings of fact outlined in the staff memorandum dated May 10, 1988 for Case S-88-004. The motion vas seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll call vnte. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Case S-88-004 presented new information which resulted in changes to the conditions of approval for Case S-87-031. These changes are: a. The applicant and adjacent property owner have not been able to come to agreement over the garage encroachment that will satisfy one of the conditions of approval for Case 5-87-031. b. The utility easements (revised from Case 5-87-031) proposed by the applicant are acceptable to the entities which already have facilities legally occupying the property if the utilities are relocated at the applicant's expense. Planning & Zoning Commission 17 of 18 May 18, 1988 Minutes Rasmus Anderson Box 2793 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Kodiak Island Borough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 May 12, 1988 RE: Case 88-019. Findings of Fact for the denial of a variance which would have permitted an existing accessory building that is located five (5) feet from the rear property line, to be remodeled into living space and connected to the existing single—family residence, to project five (5) feet into the required ten (10) foot rear yard setback in a R1--Single—Family Residential Zoning District. Portion of Lot 18, Block 2, Leite Addition; 1515 Mission Road. (Rasmus Anderson) Dear Mr. Anderson: Enclosed please find a copy of the materials, concerning the above referenced item, reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission at their regularly scheduled packet review worksession held Wednesday, May 11, 1988. If you have any questions or comments, please contact the Community Development Department at 486-5736, extension 255. Sincerely, Patricia Miley, Secret ry Community Development apartment enclosures Kodiak Island Borough MEMORANDUM DATE: May 10, 1988 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Community Development Department SUBJ: Information for the May 18, 1988 Regular Meeting RE: BACKGROUND > ITEM VII -A Case 88-019. Findings of Fact for the denial of a variance which would have permitted an existing accessory building that is located five (5) feet from the rear property line, to be remodeled into living space and connected to the existing single-family residence, to project five (5) feet into the required ten (10) foot rear yard setback in a R1--Single-Family Residential Zoning District. Portion of Lot 18, Block 2, Leite Addition; 1515 Mission Road. (Rasmus Anderson) At the April 20, 1988 Planning and Zoning Commission regular meeting, the Commission denied a variance that would have permitted an accessory building that is located five (5) feet from the property line, to be remodeled into living space and connected to the existing single-family residence. Findings of fact were deferred to the May 18, 1988 regular meeting. Staff has prepared the following findings of fact for the Commission's consideration. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or intended use of development, which generally do not apply to other properties in the same land use district. There are no exceptional physical conditions applicable to the intended use of development. In fact approval of this request could set a precedent to allow existing accessory buildings to be converted to dwelling units. This can be viewed as an intent to circumvent the minimum rear yard setback for residences. 2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships. Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would require that the existing building be moved five (5) feet or that the structure could not be used for residential purposes at all. This is an unnecessary hardship and practical difficulty because the lot is very small with limited areas available for a new single-family residence or additions and improvements to the existing single-family residence. Utilization of the existing structure would be more cost effective and pose fewer practical building difficulties in trying to improve or enlarge the existing single-family residence and conform to other setbacks and building separation requirements. Case 88-018 1 May 18, 1988 P&Z ITEM VII -A 3. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare. Granting of the variance should not result in material damage or prejudice to other properties in the area. Conversion of an existing two story accessory building into living space should not create any additional impacts on nearby lots. The land use will not change. Additionally, granting of this variance will not be prejudicial to other properties in this block. Leite Addition is an old subdivision and most of the lots and structures in Block 2 are nonconforming to lot size and/or setbacks. A review of air photos indicates widespread encroachments into required setbacks within Block 2. Two other lots in the block have been granted setback variances, including a rear yard setback variance for Lot 2, Block 2, which shares a common rear corner with the applicants' lot. In essence, this request will have no more impact on adjoining properties than the current situation and no more impact than many of the other nonconforming structures in this block have on adjoining properties. 4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan which identifies this area for High Density Residential Development. This existing land use and density will not be changed as a result of this request. Additionally, high density areas often have smaller separation between structures than those found in areas designated for lower density development.. 5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance. Actions of the applicant have not caused the conditions from which relief is being sought by a variance. The variance will be decided prior to conversion of the accessory building to living space. 6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the district involved. A single-family residence is a permitted land use in the R1--Single-Family Residential Zoning District. Case 88-018 2 May 18, 1988 P&Z Rasmus Anderson Box 2793 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Kodiak Island Borough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 May 4, 1988 RE: Case 88-019. Findings of Fact for the denial of a variance which would have permitted an existing accessory building that is located five (5) feet from the rear property line, to be remodeled into living space and connected to the existing single-family residence, to project five (5) feet into the required ten (10) foot rear yard setback in a R1--Single-Family Residential Zoning District. Portion of Lot 18, Block 2, Leite Addition; 1515 Mission Road. (Rasmus Anderson) Dear Mr. Anderson: Please be advised that the above -referenced request has been scheduled for review and action by the Planning and Zoning Commission at their May 18, 1988 regular meeting. This meeting will begin at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska. Attendance at this meeting is recommended. The week prior to the regular meeting, on Wednesday, May 11, 1988, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough conference room, the Commission will hold a worksession to review the packet material for the regular meeting. You are invited to attend this worksession in order to respond to any questions the Commission may have regarding this request. If you have any questions, please call the Community Development Department at 486-5736, extension 255. Sincerely, Patricia Miley, Secre Community Development partrment II. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF THE CITY OF KODIAK HELD APRIL 28, 1988 MEETING CALLED TO ORDER Mayor Brodie called the meeting to order at 7:34 p.m. Councilmembers Blackburn, Cratty, Iani, Perrozzi, Ramaglia, and Thompson were present and constituted a quorum. PREVIOUS MINUTES Councilmember Cratty MOVED, seconded by Councilmember Iani, to approve the minutes of the April 14, 1988, regular meet- ing. The roll call vote was Councilmembers Blackburn, Cratty, Iani, Perrozzi, Ramaglia, and Thompson in favor. The motion carried. Additions to Agenda RE: New Business, Items j, k, and 1 Councilmember Cratty MOVED, seconded by Councilmember Ramaglia, to add Resolutions Number 14-88, 15-88, and 16-88 to the agenda as New Business, items j, k, and 1. The roll call vote was Councilmembers Blackburn, Cratty, Iani, Perrozzi, Ramaglia, and Thompson in favor and the motion carried. III. PERSONS TO BE HEARD a. Planning and Zoning Commission Commissioner Steve Rennell said Case 88-019 requesting re- zone of a portion of Lower Mill Bay near the Birch Avenue intersection had boon denied. Another request would be presented next month to rezone Lower Mill Bay Road from Randy Thwing's former shop to the old Harvester Inn location- as ocationas Business. The Planning and Zoning Commission had con- ceptually approved an exception for the location of the proposed homeless shelter in a business zone. A variance request (Case 88-018) to allow use of a storage building as living space was denied. - - Mr. Rennell informed the Council that the'Bofough Assembly was reviewing the Industrial zoning on Block 3 of Lakeside Subdivision. Lots 1, 2, and 3, owned by the City, were not included. City Council Meeting 1 April 28, 1988 I RECEIVED MAY L 3 18ats COMMUNITY - OEVElOPMENTOEPT. b. Proclamation RE: Consumers Week City Manager Beukers said this proclamation was requested by Virginia Knauer, Special Adviser to the President for Con- sumer Affairs, in Washington, D.C. It proclaimed April 24 to April 30 Consumers Week. The proclamation urged schools, community organizations, labor unions, businesses, the media, and consumers in the Kodiak community to help further public awareness of consumer issues and services. c. Proclamation RE: Litter Prevention and Cleanup Month Manager Beukers told the Council this proclamation was r quested by the Kodiak Chamber of Commerce Litter and Beauti- fication Committee Proclaiming May as Litter Prevention and Cleanup Month and further designated'May 8 - 14 as Litter Prevention and Cleanup Week. The proclamation encouraged Kodiak's residents to join in support of their community cleanup campaign and to join in the Kiwanis/Kodiak Chamber of Commerce Litterthon Cleanup on Saturday, May 14. With the approval of the Council, the order of business was changed to consider New Business, item k. k. Resolution Number 15-88 RE: Commending John Parker and Darrell Berntsen, State Wrestling Champions Mayor Brodie read Resolution Number 15-88 by title. City Manager Beukers said this item was requested at the April 21 worksession to commend John Parker and Darrell Berntsen, State Wrestling Champions. Councilmember Cratty MOVED, seconded by Councilmember Blackburn, to pass and approve Resolution Number 15-88. The roll call vote was Councilmembers Blackburn, Cratty Iani, Perrozzi, Ramaglia, and Thompson in favor. The motic passed. Mayor Brodie conveyed the Council's congratulations to the wrestlers and their coach and asked Coach Rani Rowland and John Parker to the podium to receive presentation copies of the resolution. Coach Rowland said Darrell Berntsen was away on'a trip to Europe. d. Public Comments None OLD BUSINESS a. Second Reading and Public Hearing, Ordinance Number $34 RE: Amending the City of Kodiak Personnel Rules and Regula- tions _ _ _ _. . _.._ _ . _ City Council Meeting 2 April 28, 1988 Rasmus Anderson Box 2793 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Kodiak Island Borough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 April 21, 1988 RE: CASE 88-018. Request for a variance from Section 17.18.050(C) (Yards) of the Borough Code to permit an existing accessory building that is located five (5) feet from the rear property line, and will beremodeled into living space and connected to the existing single-family residence, to project five (5) feet into the required ten (10) foot rear yard setback in a R1--Single-Family Residential Zoning District on a Portion of Lot 18, Block 2, Leite Addition; 1515 Mission Road. (Rasmus Anderson) Dear Mr. Anderson: The Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting on April 20, 1988, denied the request for the variance cited above and deferred findings of fact in support of their decision until their May 18, 1988, regular meeting. An appeal of this decision may be initiated by any person or party aggrieved by filing a written notice of appeal with the City Clerk within ten days of the date of the Commission's decision. The notice of appeal must state the specific grounds for the appeal. Therefore, the Commission's decision will not be final and effective until ten days following the decision. If you have any questions about the action of the Commission, please contact me. Sincerely, Linda Freed, Director Community Development Department 4. That sufficient setbacks, lot area, buffers or other safeguards are being provided to meet the conditions listed in subsections A through C of this section. Because the location of the fireworks stand is adequately separated from nearby property and two of the four surrounding lots are vacant provision of additional buffers or other safeguards are not necessary in this instance. The sale of fireworks is also a temporary use with no lasting impacts that would require additional safeguards. C) CASE 88-018. Request for a variance from Section 17.18.050(C) (Yards) of the Borough Code to permit an existing accessory building that is located five (5) feet from the rear property line, and will be remodeled into living space and connected to the existing single-family residence, to project five (5) feet into the required ten (10) foot rear yard setback in a R1--Single-Family Residential Zoning District on a Portion of Lot 18, Elock 2, Leite Addition; 1515 Mission Road. (Rasmus Anderson) LINDA FREED indicated 60 public hearing notices were mailed for this case and 1 notice, representing two property owners was returned, opposing this request. Also, Donna Schmelzenback delivered a letter to the Community Development Department on April 20, 1988, requesting that the Ietter be read into the record. Staff recommended approval of this request. Regular Session Closed. Public Nearing Opened: Seeing and hearing none. Public Hearing Closed. Regular Session Opened. CHAIRMAN RENNELL read Ms. Schmelzenback's letter of opposition to the request into the record. A discussion ensued amongst the Commissioners, with input from Community Development Department staff, regarding the history of this property. COMMISSIONER HEINRICHS noted that he had difficulty with staff's finding regarding the "exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or intended use of development, which .generally do not apply to other properties In the same land use district." Staff found that the "exceptional physical condition applicable to the intended use of development in this case is the location of the existing accessory building, five (5) feet from the rear property line. Any use of this existing building for residential purposes would require a variance." COMMISSIONER HEINRICHS stated that he was concerned that variances would become a tool for converting accessory buildings into homes. COMMISSIONER KNUDSEN stated that she had difficulty with staff's finding "that actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is •being sought by the variance." Staff found that "actions of the applicant have not caused the conditions from which relief is being sought by a variance. The variance will be decided prior to conversion of the accessory building to living space." COMMISSIONER KNUDSEN noted that actions of the applicant created the difficulty as the applicant built the accessory building, and, therefore, caused the reason for the requested variance. COMMISSIONER RE?URICHS asked CHAIRMAN RENNELL if he could ask the applicant a few questions. After receiving the Chair's approval, a discussion ensued amongst the Commissioners, with input from Community Development Department staff, and Mr. Anderson regarding this request. COMMISSIONER HEINRICH MOVED TO GRANT a request for a variance from Section 17.18.050(C) of the Borough Code to permit an existing two Planning S Zoning Commission 6 April 20, 1988 Minutes story accessory building that is located five (5) feet from the rear property line to be converted into living space and to project five (5) feet into the required ten (10) foot rear yard setback in a RI—Single-Family Residential Zoning District on a Portion of Lot 18, Block 2, Leite Addition, subject to the following condition: "The existing single-family residence will be removed and the addition to the accessory building must comply with the rest of the setback recuirements prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the new single-family residence." The motion was seconded and FAILED by a tie vote. Commissioners Hartt, Knudsen, and Rennell voted "no." Findings of Fact for this case were deferred to the end of the agenda. D) CASE 88-019. Request for the rezoning of Lot 6, Block 11; Lot 7, Block 12; and Lots 54 through 59, Block 12, Aleutian Homes Subdivision from R1--Single-Family Residential to B --Business in accordance with Chapter 17.72 (Amendments and Changes) of the Borough Code. Located at 915, 917, 1011, 1013, 1015, 1017, and 1111 Hill Bay Road and 111 Birch 'Street. (Peter Harris, Island Realty, Inc., Corporation of St. Mary's Parish of the Archdiocese of Anchorage, Karen Beaver, Jerome Selby) LINDA FREED indicated 294 public hearing notices were mailed for this case and 3 were returned, 2 stating "no objections" and 1 opposing this request. Staff recommended denial of this request. Regular Session Closed. Public Hearing Opened: CRAIG JOHNSON, a real estate broker representing at least two property owners, appeared before the Commission and expressed support for this request. Mr. Johnson noted that Mill Bay Road's long term trend was towards business development and that financing could be obtained for residences within business districts. Mr. Johnson read a letter from Vicki Case, Branch Manager of City Mortgage Corp., that stated in part "our decision to close such a loan would be of course based .on . the present and proposed highest and best use of the property. If the area indicates a trend toward transition to business use then we would probably decline to place any type of a mortgage on the property. If highest and best use is of residential and no trends are indicated or present then we would be happy to accept the property as collateral..." A. discussion ensued amongst the Commissioners, and Mr. Johnson regarding the rezoning proposal. It was noted that a better rezoning -proposal would include the telephone company and the Mason's property along Mill Bay Road. Mr. Johnson stated that he would prefer a definitive vote on this request at this meeting, rather than to have the request tabled for another public hearing at the next Planning and Zoning Commission regular meeting. - PHIL ANDERSON, 316 Maple, appeared before the Commission and expressed opposition to this request. Mr. Anderson noted that this was a "spot" zoning request and that public use lands existed right across the street•, that there are already problems with traffic in the area and that granting this request would only increase these problems. Mr. Anderson also stated that this request was "strip" zoning and that Mill Bay Road had become a 200 foot wide business district for several miles. TOBY COOK, owner of Lot 58, Block 12, Aleutian Homes Subdivision, appeared before the Commission and expressed support for this request. Mr. Cook stated that this property is transitional to business development and therefore not desirable as residential property. Mr. Cook concurred that traffic was bad on Mill Bay Road stating that initially the rezone request would have no impact on the existing traffic problems, but that the rezone to business would accelerate improvements and traffic patterns along Mill Bay Road, suggesting that an overpass might be built to handle Planning & Zoning Commission 7 'April 20, 1988 Minutes ITEM VI -C RECEIVED TO: Kodiak Planning and Zonino Commission APR 20 Iwo COM►luxm FROM: Donna Schmelzenbach OEVEIQri41ENTOBL P. O. Box 1920 Lot 3, Block 2, Leite"Subdivision RE: CASE 88-018, request for variance for set back for accessory building on Lot 18, Block 2, Leite Addition; 1515 Mission Road. (Rasmus Anderson) My husband and I own the property directly behind Mr. Anderson's lot. Several years ago Mr. Anderson built the building now under discussion just five feet off his back property line. At the time we were unhappy because he built a second house on a lot that was not legally large enough for one, and he built it too close to our common property line. When the issue came before planning and zoning, Mr. Anderson and his wife insisted that the building was not a house at all, but a shed for storage. The fact that it was constructed like and looked like a two story house with a full deck on one side held no sway at the hearing because they insisted that they would not live in it but.merely needed more space for their possessions. It was borne out at the hearing that the building was, in fact, out of compliance even for a shed: it was too big and 'too tali. Since the city inspector had been on the site more than once and had okayed the "shed's" illegal demensions (and hence Mr. Anderson threatened to sue if he was forced to comply with the zoning law) th.e "shed " was given the necessary variance to remain the size that it is. Not long after this some of the possession=_. that Anderson's stored in their shed turned out to be human and the place has been u.5ed as a sort of bunk house ever since. Apparently, the inconvenience of having the kitchen iri one ,building and sleeping quarters in another has caused Mr. Anderson to ask that the two houses be connected and so has asked for another variance. It would be totally irrepsonsible for planning and zonirg to allow the Mr. Anderson to get away with this. He lied about the use of the building in order to get it constructed in the first place, and now Planning and Zoning is not only going to condone the lie but are going to let him do more building. If anyone on planning and zoning would bother to actually go and look at the property, I'm sure you would be shocked at the crowding in the area. The Anderson's entire lot would be covered with buildings if he puts another structure between the two he already has. One wall of his old house is only five feet from the wall of the house on the other side of of him. This variance is not just a matter of a. •five foot set back, it is a matter of gross over crowding. It is also a matter of ethics. Several years ago my husband inquired about building a house on a lot that was probably twice the size of Mr. ITEM VI -C Anderson/s, but still under the legal size. There were no other buildings near.the lot, but planning and zoning said that we could not possibly have a variance to build one house on an undersized lot. Why can Mr. Anderson build two? Are zoning regulations only applied at the commission's whim? A compromise'that would illiminate some crowding, but would still let the Andersons to have a new house, might be to allow them to add a kitchen (or whatever) to the new house with the stipulation that they tear down the old house when the new house was completed. '� tiECEStD OCT 40tu i COMMUgiY FIOFMNRO@C Snit: /'t, ZO' i t (60/0 • n b2 id A/J t seas.. ,s' {1 /e'bar tt cd the (o Jovring described p ,Aer !or/B 8zdCtt L471?oDi7/ON, US sv4VEY /69/ ar Pv (1 RrenkaS O and that de bnpro.emenes situatedthcrconare within the property limes and do nese n.crlap or encroach on the property lying adjacent thereto. that 1N improvements on property Tying adjacent thereto encroach on the premises in question and that there are no roadways. irammts as lines or other visible east -menu on said property except ss indi- cated hereon. ret Dated this 23 6 d %fAEcg 19 6'O �.tv.> #: LGliet.nc I ROY 6. ECKLDND Registered land Surveyor ]Dnvn by: PAF 'Date: 3.23 - 80 H 1-3 H n riaCti\rip OCT 'Z 0 19\ COMMUNITY ossopmENT DEPT. 20' L. (6 [-ND / • /4/3 :e71 a.os fe-i;k4r. I hereby cern ve surveyed the fdlowing rty: PAer zorkY. Beee.rz, sire A0o/7/6,k ass-eidevg-f /69/ vr Per 80"4-45: /7-17e ie and that the improvements situated thereon are within the property lines and do not overlap or encroach on the property lying adjacent thereto. that improvements on property lying adjacent thereto encroach on the premises in question and that there are no roadways. transmis- sion• lines or other visible easements on said property except as indi- cated hereon. Dated this — day o ---34ECII i9 67° 1 ROY A. ECKLUND Registered Land Surveyor Dra Date: 3 • 23 • 50 1 I hereby certify that 1 have surveyed the following described property: frAer zore. Beect- zer7F ADD/776W I&. •• AI; • and that the fmprovements situated thereon are within the property. lines - and clonot overlap or encroach on the property lying adjacent thereto. that impriOvements on property lying adjacent thereto encroach on the premisesi, in question and that there are no roadways. transrnis- sion lines or other visible easements on said property except as indi- Dcaatreedclthheis--re". 23 r -al c ROY A. ECKLUND Registered Land Surveyor 12c11 .19 BO Drawn by: (Date: 0 • 3 • 69 \ LTG [ND i• 4/i cep st 1 s:oF 44 Ittil 44, Da Ay .. 4,- .8 6v*::44-114 * A r •••• •• • ito 4. ,p •••• ••90••• . %.11, Roy A. Ecklund 6ri O. 16334 .844.-4617 .941'14,**,4' 4 ° )110;7s. sleorm: ( . Scale: m- 1 r ITEM VI -C Kodiak Island Borough MEMORANDUM DATE: April 11, 1988 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Community Development Department SUBJECT: Information for the April 20, 1988 Regular Meeting RE: CASE 88-018. Request for a variance from Section 17.18.050(C) (Yards) of the Borough Code to permit an existing accessory building that is located five (5) feet from the rear property line, and will,be remodeled into living space and connected to the existing single-family residence, to project five (5) feet into the required ten (10) foot rear yard setback in a R1--Single-Family Residential Zoning District on a Portion of Lot 18, Block 2, Leite Addition; 1515 Mission Road. (Rasmus Anderson) Sixty (60) public hearing notices were distributed on April 8, 1988. Date of site visit: April 1 and 8, 1988 1. Applicant: Rasmus Anderson 2. Land Owner: Same. 3. Request: For a variance from Section 17.18.050(C) (Yards) of the Borough Code to permit an existing accessory building that is located five (5) feet from the rear property line, and will be remodeled into living space and connected to the existing single-family residence, to project five (5) feet into the required ten (10) foot rear yard setback. 4. Existing Zoning: R1--Single-Family Residential 5. Zoning History: The 1968 Comprehensive Plan identifies this area as Residential -R1. Two 1976 requests for R2--Two-Family Residential zoning were denied (Cases 392-A and 415-A). In 1984, the Planning and Zoning Commission determined that the accessory building on the lot is in violation of Title 17 but decided that the violation would not be enforced (Case 83-133). Departmental files indicate no further activity. 6. Location: Physical: 1515 Mission Road Legal: A Portion of Lot 18, Block 2, Leite Addition 7. Lot Size: 3,746 square feet Case 88-018 1 Arpil 20, 1988 P&Z ITEM VI -C 8. Existing Land Use: Single-family residence and a two story accessory building. 9. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North: Lot 3, Block 2, Leite Addition Use: Single-family residence Zoning: R1--Single-Family Residential South: Portion of Lot 18, Block 2, Leite Addition Use: Single-family residence Zoning: R1--Single-Family Residential East: Lot 17, Block 2, Leite Addition Use: Single-family residence Zoning: R1--Single-Family Residential West: Lot 19, Block 2, Leite Addition Use: Single-family residence Zoning: R1--Single-Family Residential 10. Comprehensive Plan: The 1968 Comprehensive Plan depicts Density Residential Development. this area for High 11. Applicable Regulations: The following sections of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Borough Code are applicable to this request: 17.18.050 Yards. C. Rear Yard. The minimum rear yard COASTAL MANAGEMENT APPLICABLE POLICIES Residential Development 1. Location In areas with poorly draining connected to a sewer line facilities shall be designed pollute rivers, lakes, and water supply. required is ten feet. soils, development where feasible shall be . Where this is not feasible, onsite so as not to cause conditions that will other water bodies, including the ground Consistent: Yes. The lot is served by public water and sewer. 2. Open Space Green areas and open space shall be retained to the maximum extent feasible and prudent when land is subdivided. Consistent: Not applicable. This action does not subdivision. involve land Case 88-018 2 Arpil 20, 1988 P&Z ITEM VI -C Access New subdivisions or other residential developments on the shoreline shall provide usable public access to and along the shoreline, extending the length of the development, to the extent feasible and prudent. Consistent: Not applicable. This lot is not located along the shoreline. 4. Hazardous Lands Development shall not occur in hazardous areas such as avalanche runout zones, active floodplains, and high water channels to the extent feasible and prudent. Siting, design, and construction measures to minimize exposure to coastal erosion, mass wasting and historic tsunami run-up shall be required to the extent feasible and prudent. Consistent: Not applicable. This lot is not located in a "hazardous" area. 5. Wetlands Filling and drainage of water bodies, floodways, backshores, and natural wetlands shall be consistent with ACMP Standards 6 AAC 80.070 (Energy Facilities) and 6 AAC 80.130 (Habitats). Consistent: Not applicable. This action does not involve any filling or drainage activities. COMMENTS: The applicants' lot currently has a single-family residence and a two story accessory building in the rear yard. The accessory building is located 5 feet from the rear property line. The applicants propose to convert the accessory building into living space and connect it to the existing residence by a newly constructed addition. At least two options for the connecting addition are under consideration. The result will be one larger single-family residence on the lot. A variance is necessary because the rear yard setback for a single-family residence is 10 feet. The rear yard setback for accessory buildings in the rear yard is 5 feet. Therefore, it is only the conversion of the existing accessory building into living space that gives rise to the need for a variance. In order for the Commission to grant a variance, all of the following conditions must be satisfied: 1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or intended use of development, which generally do not apply to other roperties in the same land use district. The exceptional physical condition applicable to the intended use of development in this case is the location of the existing accessory building, five (5) feet from the rear property line. Any use of this existing building for residential purposes would require a variance. Case 88-018 3 Arpil 20, 1988 P&Z ITEM VI -C 2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships. Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would require that the existing building be moved five (5) feet or that the structure could not be used for residential purposes at all. This is an unnecessary hardship and practical difficulty because the lot is very small with limited areas available for a new single-family residence or additions and improvements to the existing single-family residence. Utilization of the existing structure would be more cost effective and pose fewer practical building difficulties in trying to improve or enlarge the existing single-family residence and conform to other setbacks and building separation requirements. 3. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare. Granting of the variance should not result in material damage or prejudice to other properties in the area. Conversion of an existing two story accessory building into living space should not create any additional impacts on nearby lots. The land use will not change. Additionally, granting of this variance will not be prejudicial to other properties in this block. Leite Addition is an old subdivision and most of the lots and structures in Block 2 are nonconforming to lot size and/or setbacks. A review of air photos indicates widespread encroachments into required setbacks within Block 2. Two other lots in the block have been granted setback variances, including a rear yard setback variance for Lot 2, Block 2, which shares a common rear corner with the applicants' lot. In essence, this request will have no more impact on adjoining properties than the current situation and no more impact than many of the other nonconforming structures in this block have on adjoining properties. 4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan which identifies this area for High Density Residential Development. This existing land use and density will not be changed as a result of this request. Additionally, high density areas often have smaller separation between structures than those found in areas designated for lower density development. 5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance. Actions of the applicant have not caused the conditions from which relief is being sought by a variance. The variance will be decided prior to conversion of the accessory building to living space. 6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the district involved. A single-family residence is a permitted land use in the R1--Single-Family Residential Zoning District. Case 88-018 4 Arpil 20, 1988 P&Z ITEM VI -C RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds that this request does meet all the conditions necessary for a variance to be granted under Chapter 17.66 (Variance) of the Borough Code. APPROPRIATE MOTION: Should the Commission agree with the staff recommendation, the appropriate motion is: Move to grant a request for a variance from Section 17.18.050(C) of the Borough Code to permit an existing two story accessory building that is located five (5) feet from the rear property line to be converted into living space and to project five (5) feet into the required ten (10) foot rear yard setback in a R1--Single-Family Residential Zoning District on a Portion of Lot 18, Block 2, Leite Addition and to adopt the findings contained in the staff report dated April 11, 1988, as "Findings of Fact" for this case. Case 88-018 5 Arpil 20, 1988 P&Z + 4 -+•++ 4 r r +I- +—,. ju , , 1.# / 4 •/4 i •J, )(M1 1 1• ' ,- i +++ , , + : + +—+ i +++ ,+i •+�- . , i, + + + +' t ' ± r 1. H. + }}} + } t + + + f 1 ' + 1 J 1 11r � F + j.. + +++ ` + ++ , 1. : {: +++ +Li+4, +. + 1 -+ ♦ 4 , -,+ ii + _• ,-h r .,+ + , + rT _r++I--. +++; + 4 + +-4 1 + -r } +-n 4 4T- r + + a . t 4 . r / II rel i.� igel 1 - + , F n • T`/� / �:wit -a$ 0 i 411)III r -4441Z4 Cr, , £1 7T � Y i r * r + YY { pp"iiiiiii iiiiiiii =NM =MN ■ "iiiiiiiii •. 'C'aiiiiii iiaaiiiiiiii 'aiaiiiiiiai CaNaaaaiiaEiiiiiiaia=iiiiiiiiiii: �iai� 'aaia iiiiiiaaiaaii iia'a iii aiiaiai is iaiiiiiaiiii......=Z�'i aaaaaa "paiaaa•• •.••;' aaaaaaaiaai 1 i i aaaaaaiaaa i �a� aiiiiiiiiiia EEMEN � ••••iii a iaai iai.� ai' a aiiiiiaaiiia•uaiu•iaaaiiiaiii iuGii iiiiiiiiiun.■N�■NN.■N■i..ea.ii■■■■.■.■N.■■iaei■■.■n■■nn■i■...0 Cala""""""""'NZa iiiiiiiiaiaiiiii.N. iiiiai i." :iiiiipup"""" .NN■■■■■■■e....N ■■ 1111 .. .uN■ee .. .. ■ ■N . ■■ .e .■...... 1111. ■■■ . 1111.. .p....... ■■■.w..i...i...o . ■.... ■. e•..•..aaa••......... .Caa aIIi@aIaaai a�aai III aiii'aiaai .1'i'aaiaaa::.a•aaa i.eae.■.■ ■e.■■■ .ii N.■N�...■■ ■.. ■.e.e ■i■ila ii' 'aaeia ..........i.........mop ai114111111411111111111:11:11111111111111111111111111111%iiiiinn•ni '..'�'iN■.NN.■....i■.Ciuin'•i •'—'• N..NN..N... ■. ■NN•u.■■■.Nt.■■■.i■i■■nN■.e...■W.■■e� • ■ ■■N.e■■ N■....■.. ■■Ne■... ..■■.e.. ■■...■■■■■.euie..■...■■ ■■■i ■N■i■■eeeN.N.■e■ ••....U.ZNi a '.NiiC� ilii iai■aC iaai aaaaa pp.• .. MEMO N iiiii " 1111111 .NN. 1e■■ ...p •al...... ■■■■■ 1NiiNi 'ia'aaa� aiii"'ialii•'a as"a' ia'ia iii.aaii=C•i•• 111111111111111111iii :i''i■: N■■i 11111.1.■ ■■.iii.■ NN.I ••• i■ia ..■i.■ . .....Niu 11_ ■ '�G. 1 _ 1111.. _e.�i ■ NNN. ■ .N _ i.anN.NN■e. 1 ilii•' N.�WON ■■N■. 'a .NaN ■■■.■i mom iiaaai' ■ ■_.. N■■ .11..13■■■ mom aaaI �NN.Ci' 'aria � ii■iieiiiii UM ME 'i"'i: ■ ..■ _"l 'ii• . 1111■■■■■N Billiiillmlillimin 111111 �.NNR ■■.N ■ MEN ... ■N■ N■ =•N.7■ NEMENNEHEENN MENEEMEHENN ME ni N■N NOMMEN ■.■■■■■■■eel■• MOM ■a a MEIN i" MN ■■.■..e■eMe■ .Nai■:i■iaii. ■■■■e.i■...■■■a iii i ■iiiaii .. _ E■■■ b r■MINNNONnomImmmEmmmEmE Emsnommomm ■N■e■un■i N ■■e ■ mm ...• Nom■ 1.1141111 MEN =ME .11.11■■.lee■ aii:ai■ mommum e■ mum N ■■■ ■ ..■ 1111 . X11•■ =MINN II 111 II • F... aMNs MON 11 NE iNM ■� i i 5 Jt e 15 e lee ■ •'i NNii ,• .■N• Ela NE . ia1 • ..i 11.11. .. EN Ni iI • .:EM ••i MLUCWO1VUU SUBDIVISION • • • • i 1111L 47.* SELIE:LANE III! RIP .. : . ..... ...... cUR 1011111 %WED imAunt V E WOW ......... ............. ........... 0 : ....... mtE. Al CASE 88-018 Lot 18 Blk 2 Leite Addition Itt:Variance 1515 Mission Road R=325' ST sr V at. a 4 v SELIG z EL .•IONING:IREY 'RESIDENTIAL, R-1,2,,,/ • t. T 11, L pg 4 R41.. 4 44 I, td uj 0 1/4 \ S MEONOFF ,/,/ i•7 1(./,‘ //,,. ‘,\/(‘ / \\../V 51111 1: 01111111 51 ' 1151111 1.111111 111111111 E ANOF now*112 311-111 o' EWA 1E ril1111111 41 OV • Ljt_. RESIDENTIAL. R3 Ala - pop K S 080NI • RURAL RESIDEN-,T141,1-t' Li31.1SINESS';" LAKE 7.10USTRIAL #:3.. E. ,te 4 4 '. : : ', t: : 1.4 4 : . : ; VI :4 , tONSERVATION•..i;•;Y: c: ;0" A......4:ta. .-PUBLJC:A.ISE L'ANISS:1. :1 * ;.• 4 .. - •• it CI, \?•.— \ STREET tai ....... "1St E CD z0 cc b11112 jffiL z 0 z 0 DRI VE SIMEONOFF Wes Min Ca 211110311.7 1,111 11 1111110" TRr T logiiiigirrniviiP NON. Ala Zings 0 • Ines: arab' re So OC 4 VIE 2 it \ \ \ \ \ \ V / tC 1 Ilk pop sueo,v/stolv US SUR/ 287 .. Ci°iL4n: i:liy.yfir,.t. f�a`. F P • s `t°° °ii "!:r?. G ,G,i�2;40. D °�>"i : •• i . 6 a oD Ii1 RECEIVED APR 1 2 1988 rmuau,nv KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 99615 ITEM VI -C p l.n3LIC HEARING NOTICE A public hearing will be held on Wednesday, April 20, 1988. The meeting will begin at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska, before the Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission, to hear comments, if any, on the following request: CASE 88-018. Request for a variance from Section 17.18.050(C) (Yards) of the Borough Code to permit an existing accessory building that is located five (5) feet from the rear property line, and will be remodeled into living space and connected to the existing single-family residence, to project five (5) feet into the required ten (10) foot rear yard setback in a R1--Single-Family Residential Zoning District on a Portion of Lot 18, Block 2, Leite Addition; 1515 Mission Road. (Rasmus Anderson) 1�+/ �✓ •••77%-renn."na" Aff;774.aitCH you do not w'sh to testify verba y, you ay ?clavicle your comm6nts in the space below, or in a letter to the Community Development Department prior to the meeting. You are being notified because you are a property owner in the area of the request. If you have any questions about the request, please call us at 486-5736, .gxtension 255. 7Sk/X Pree,�.6erMr' 9, ANO o9 sveac,'..73rtbeer ( �„JSvea, lc,cxs� Your Name: r ja�;`: '0:: 2t1T. g Address: /1//c7 5 a t (1�4-moi Your property description: Comments:�2y�-44J,-Pi J i /Lt.ti J 4_ U /h.�1,a-ate �^�s...� (l i / / oma /l (.lp,., rre n..c - �' lir , 7. z tsi 0 4 . ' . ..... .... /, LANE 'IT a q MLUCflVVUUU SUBDIVISIO mali kt fiCie 40 PUR TOV • AI WE. ••• :g 14. ... •- • •• P•.•..„•„•,•.•„•,•„•,•„••,•,• ...•••••••,•,.•,..*V5 . . ; . 1".***:';.*:1`.• 6.6. • • • •.•'.•4•1•.•111.•.•.'1*"'"It.'"•.•.•.•, .1••••• 40.-r • . • • * • • Le...2„...s.a: 54 liti 40 CASE 88-018 Let'18 Blk 2 Leite Addition Variance 1515 Mission Road R=325' 4 • :H ST. 44cj. ff 4 4. 16 Mil. L Ear SEL G 9 '8 °T41. 33 •410 1111,41 • • ....... ....... :12 • err:1r ZONING KEY RESIDENTIAL R-1 P.ESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL R-3 RURAL RESIDENTIAL --BUSINESS 'INDUSTRIAL CONSERVATION „ , , • PUBLIC USE LANDS L PARK SU8O" V• . • 4V. • ,. • 4 i • t, • , • • • • , •,„,- 4,- • „.• • a ' WATERSHED \'. \\ c••/ ST REE Tul ! ! .C-\/"..\/':•\/'-\/`•\/: • 5; w 0 • / 0111t1r, MINIM -) E NOE --/\/ // <•-.,./\'-"'"*\/-.' /v/, .,/ \-•./\--/•,,, \ / ,/ //\•/\•....\ //// • Lij ARANOF AV Ei OWNS 1: REZANOF 5 mg NE fll NI II 0 cc MIMIC ROMP 0 z 0 z DRIVE WNW SIM II SIMEONOFF I RIM 00472r- 01111fil . 0 V 1199gallii 11 rag Eirl 1151131111 IS / . • • 1.0 111 1. ae1/4 TR Eralnii..1:41pano. a a Iz • • • orritio, /‘ • /,,/ 4' /CI • IN- • \ "' • I \ ••• I \ ••*. / / • OC € 4 N w jeo, v A0Dirin- IOS4 US SUM 28 Kodiak Island Boroug P.O. KODIAK, ALASKABOX 99615-12461246 *Idrin1M Vadelisrab1a as Add o d ~ fYwNicient Address Fenvawese al Naga this aale;gp4 R1200050160 MURRAY,DENNIS E PATRICIA P.O. BOX 2029 KODIAK AK 99615 b OqDI 4- - � U S0.POSIAGE_ 5 APR -8'88 Y- J _ 14AS\Ptl.MF1tP 6031775 Kodiak Island Borough P.O. BOX 1246 KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-1246 x::,1: LOW£RY,LYNN P.O. BOX 2171 KODIAK M* hyo lf° n Add beKD !ens Address shod `. Ottt -Z i aw i +debk R1200020090 AK 99615 �� U S.P0S1AGf APR -8'88 �-.i a� ❑ iasis 0.25 9< A S`'(P atiV g 6031775 us 28 ... t7 W r' w z a Kodiak Island Boroug P.O.. BOX 1246 KODIAK, ALASKA 99615.1246 eigo tialt4i!T851e i,rel. "'''S �nX_ls�d - o0. R1200010100 SHARRATT,LLOYD E AVIS P.O. BOX 881 KODIAK o AK 99615 kjG HECEI VED APR 1 2 198u COMMUNITY BEVEWPMENT OPT; r 1 t Kodiak Island Borough P.O. BOX 1246 KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-1246 R1200060010 JEHOVAHS WITNESS KODIAK NELSONsFIALO,JOHNSON P.O. BOX 152qv KODIAK AK 99615 RECEIVED APR 121988 COMMUNITY oiV$LCPMeff DEM 't* • • POST OFFICE BOX 1246 KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 ( ) Conditional Use Permit ( ) Exception (4Variance ( ) Zoning Change: From: To: / CODE SECTION INVOLVED: . (� . v (G-) \<ica-7 NOTE: The application fee for all items covered by this form i 550. Conditional Use Permits, Exceptions, and Variance Applications also require the submission of a site plan. APPLICANT: 1241/45 t6 AW`0, Name `E -x a-ia S Address - 3307 Nome Telephone Work Telephone City, State, Zip PROPERTY: P42nu J Iro , ' 0-, , Li-A.—c. i= /sco171 I i 013 - Lot Block Subdivision Name United States Survey 4 Section, Township, Range, S.M. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY: 6-R(2' NJ' _ (3L-WC0 • PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY: Gaj.5C/Lt,t.C'( A •-) APD C-to'JTth cf LYI M ce_N' -r- � S i .- Q - ? Ace, e, -c -i 1`Xo. `( (� 1 S W % u� cA)(4)2622_ AC -t- (-�o (.moo Putriccl/J ()F 1 have been advised of the procedures ir:volvea with this request and have received a copy of the appropriate recu;aticns. Authorized Agent Daze Data Application Accepted:'let- Rasmus Anderson Box 2793 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Kodiak Island Borough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486.5736 April 8, 1988 RE: CASE 88-018. Request for a variance from Section 17.18.050(C) (Yards) of the Borough Code to permit an existing accessory building that is located five (5) feet from the rear property line, and will be remodeled into living space and connected to the existing single-family residence, to project five (5) feet into the required ten (10) foot rear yard setback in a R1--Single-Family Residential Zoning District on a Portion of Lot 18, Block 2, Leite Addition; 1515 Mission Road. (Rasmus Anderson) Dear Mr. Anderson: Please be advised that the above -referenced request has been scheduled for review and action by the Planning and Zoning Commission at their April 20, 1988 regular meeting. This meeting will begin at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska. Your attendance at this meeting is recommended. The week prior to the regular meeting, on Wednesday, April 13, 1988, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough conference room, the Commission will hold a worksession to review the packet material for the regular meeting. You are invited to attend this worksession in order to respond to any questions the Commission may have regarding this request. If you have any questions, please .call the Community Development Department at 486-5736, extension 255. Sincerely, Patricia Miley, Setary Community Development Department KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 99615 ITEM VI -C PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE A public hearing will be held on Wednesday, April 20, 1988. The meeting will begin at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska, before the Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission, to hear comments, if any, on the following request: CASE 88-018. Request for a variance from Section 17.18.050(C) (Yards) of the Borough Code to permit an existing accessory building that is located five (5) feet from the rear property line, and will be remodeled into living space and connected to the existing single-family residence, to project five (5) feet into the required ten (10) foot rear yard setback in a R1--Single-Family Residential Zoning District on a Portion of Lot 18, Block 2, Leite Addition; 1515 Mission Road. (Rasmus Anderson) If you do not wish to testify verbally, you may provide your comments in the space below, or in a letter to the Community Development Department prior to the meeting. You are being notified because you are a property owner in the area of the request. If you have any questions about the request, please call us at 486-5736, extension 255. Your Name: Mailing Address: Your property description: Comments: h-� SEL EF LANE i': Z W 4 0 I lo lit R TOV 11 M•AI CASE 88-018 " Lot '18 Ink 2 Leite Addition :.Variance 1515 Mission Road P • I V S • 1111VE :ti / m ST. R=325' BOK N N ii • • 4� p 97, •A, •19 „g< • os e zit >3d al 4 11 a L 9 • • > 4* 1•> • • / -4 0 a / 1111111E 0®111 II z w > 4 / / \ l _ S ME ONOf `--i/\i,/\\/.VC/ \1_\ G w 0 z w a ARANOF AVE REZANOF awn Mit NO IS ENERME ei MAI LOV Z 0 2 MES) 4. • EF :ti taAtt:"i" ZONING KEY RESIDENTIAL R -I "RESIDENTIAL D RESIDENTIAL R 3 RURAL RESIDENTIAL -BUSINESS -INDUSTRIAL CONSERVATION PUBLIC USE LANDS WATERSHED 4 AmpARK LAYa swaVI STREET' ,\\;\\/\\/ `A/ \‘“ w� �'�•�q :I�\ SIMEONOFF MEWS mein gnaw 0 z 0 DRI VE 1 is 9L TR T \ • • 4 CEA VI SOL/THE4s OI TIn.. UBD, VISION US SURtr 287: 6 6 2 a 9 0 .. .. _.. •n ... .. ..�...., it, P.O. P.O. BOX 1593 KODIAK AK 99615 6"MATN,RJ3ERT-E-NKNCY 9 Q a 6 It 81120510060 -RDSAL`ES; CEINTDN7JOSEPBINE P.O. BOX 616 USCG KODIAK AK 99519 81120510070 413 REZAVOF DRIVE STE 107 KODIAK AK 99615 '--- R1120450010 -"'- HaTFTFL'O;K'ENNETH S P.O. 30X 1217 KODIA< AK 99615 9 81120510090' "MA t3TJ3ERT-E-NANCY 41 ; R 1A F KOtI•K 99615 `� 81120450020 9P.O. ECKL-UNO,-ROY E LITA 30X 146 KDDIA< AK 99615 t - R1120510100 ALWEtTfJEAN E E dILLTFAM P.O. 33X 1711 KODIAK AK 99515 R1200010070 KODIA<, C ITY--OF P.O. 37X 1397 KODIAK AK 99615 i 0t0 V. 3Z 81200010080 L P4 -1k) 2 -DU PR EE--' TM I -CH A E-L—R-E- DA'W N 3P.D. BOX 3446 4 KODIAK AK 99615 s 9 21200010090 2 21 2 24 z6 2 21 3 a 3 3 4 4 4 4 6, rrLMU�'1H IiVCJ,9NItuARLI L. 14932 FACITA DRIVE LA MIRAD4 LA 90538 • 6 11120450030 �7fLKSONTPE1 ER L LOUTSE 471 B TAYLOR CUTJFF RJAD SEOUI.M WA 98382 9 10 „4 16 R1120450040 SUV—PtTL CCLUJ1St T•YLD. GUT R3'0 A 362 81120450050 DISK 533T1`E DEBRA E 1417 ISMAILDV ST KODIA< AK 99615 D 33 30 31 35 42 43 44 46 47 48 S0 81120450060 HARRINaTOV,WILLIAM H LORENE K WARRINGTON P.O. 32A 3511 KODIAK AC99615 11120450080 MCMUR2YltNNIS E—LANA P.O. 3JX 3265 KODIAK AK 93615 21120450130 E [L SWJRTTITC ASW 1 E iN-CE7TETRY P.O. 33A 3504 KODIAA AK 99615 57 50 59 60 R1120450150 0LJTTTTTMOMY J E SUSAN S P.O. BOX 1244 KODIA< AK 99615 R1120510050 6 r R12000/0/00 4 SWAWR ATT, L—L-TYD—HATS 5P.01, 33X 861 6 KODIA:K AK 99615 6 9 a 11 12 U200010110 13 PANAMAR-OFFT tDr4ARD G 14 1417 MISSION RD 05 KODIA;K AK 99615 16 1] 10 19 20 21 R1200010131 22TARRT3I1EV— MA—NCY 23P.3. 33X 876305 24WASILLA AK 97687 25 35 n 20 29 30 R1200010141 3, .-3NNtECTDEMNI-SrDONVA 321413 MISSION ROAD 33 KODIA( A'( 99515 4 va 36 37 3 39 81200020310 43-ST-EPHENS 'MELVIN 41 P.O. 33X 533 42 KODIA( AK 99515 43 a4 45 46 a 43 81200020020 7 GORD-DNIB-RY;.E-a-oCIVt 50 1512 ISMAILOV 5, KODIA( AK 99515 52 s3 54 55. 55 57 R1200020030 53"S'C=4MECZEN3AVITEVERT[D3 NINA 59P.D. 31X 1920 60K0DIAK AK 99615 6 21200020040 1EI F1TwILLI-APi 2 P.D. 3DX 1398 KODIA( AK 99615 6 7 0 11 12 13 14 9 0 9 0 81200020050 t1CAUS"JN T M Y R ON 03A KJDIAK AUTO REBJILJ P.O. 33X 251 KODIAK AK 99515` 3 21 5 6 3 3 31 3 3 3 3 3 1 4 4 4 4 4 5! 5 5 R12J0020060 TORGR'A'MSENTJAMES R E =LLA 1520 ISMAILOV KODI4( AK 99615 812)0020070 M E RPM Y i W&Y V E-E-L"Y N V E 1526 ISMAILOV KODIAK AK 99615 81200020080 MOR'PHYTWA NE 52 ISM•IL V D+tI K AK - 615 R1200D20090 LOWERY,LYN'4 P.D. 33X 2171 KODIAK AK 99615 R12)00 /00 PWRK'SRTO3NALD EDWARD KRAJNAK,MARY JANE P.3. 33X 2948 6`KODIAK AK 99615 81200020110 40 1418 01 'KOUSKOV 6 KODIAK 2 9 0 t 2 3 4 6 n 8 rr 20 21 22 23 24 25 22 2c 20 37 32 33 34 33 36 37 38 39 40 r 42 43 44 45 46 42 a3 49 51 52 53 54 5 AK 99615 7iNSENiPAUL R_ P.O. 3DX 553 KDDI 4< AK 99615 81200020120 -RTCCS,SVEA C 1418 01 (DUSK 3V KODIA( AK 99615 81200020131 -)Rt,Sri N L P.D. 33X 3228 KODIA.K AK 99615 82200020140 -P ETECS J N, VJRM 4 1525 'IISSION RD KDDIAK AK 99615 81200020151 KcWAN,MELT/N—J P.D. 33X 528 KODIA( AK 99615 81200020152 KE AM, LVIN J P. . DX 528 KOlIA • •1515 R12)0020153 ROSt,ALTEN C GUORIA 1521 MISSI3N RD KODIAK AK 99515 a 9 »nn7ni S4 7iNSENiPAUL R_ P.O. 3DX 553 KDDI 4< AK 99615 6 81230020170 1SK4US?V1MYRUM ,084 KJJIAK AUTO REBJI_D ,P.O. 33X 251 ,"KDDr4K AK 995[5 1 2 21230020181 3 OMLID.MAR1E ,P.O. 31X 2745 5KODI4K AK 99515 7 0 9 v 81230020182 ,, 4NDER'S"ON RA-SMUS C EMILIA ,P.O. 3JX 2793 „KODI4K AK 97515 15 15 37 33 r 33 81230020190 n VET -FR -ANS AFF'A-MS`rADMI-N—OF „235 E 3TH AVENUE 33 ANCHORAGE AK 99501 14 3: 37 3v R1200020200 ,o HELG4SON.KRISTJAN E CLARA 11 P.O. 30X 546 ,, KODIAK AK 93515 63 44 45 45 47 46 81270050040 „"MAJORTJA-HES—E—E—SHARON 5o P.O. 3JX 532 51 KODIAK AK 97615 52 53 54 55 55 57 81200050060 53 FRY,ELME2 E—BETTY 5,13.0. 37X 2947' 4 KODIAK AK 99515 6 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 R1200050070 "-STERN'S , N JR MTVCE7BUVZTIE—y P.O. 53X 4005 KODIA< AK 99515 i R1200050080 3 JtVS 67AYNt L L OWN M ,P.O. 33X 3180 2KODIA( AK 99615 3 5 6 c R1230050090 9N'ATIVrDAD,BABTOLOME V E A o1510 MISSION RD 1KODIA( AK 99615 —"— 2 1 5 6 R1200050100 c•MAZASI-.,ANRRtMEGI7 sMARASI5AV,FEL ICIDAD -P.O. 33X 759 USCG 1-KOMit < AC 99519 2 a 5 6 81200050110 , CARLSUN,C"ARL SR E META M cP.O. 33K 2578 9KODIA< AK 99615 0 1 2 3 1 5 R1200050120 6-S-T-EW"A-R-PT 40WARD—EDWARD E 7S7EWARi,SHARON KAY ,P.O. 33X 589 USCG (KODIAK AK 9951-9 0 1 1 81200050130 5'8O''1NEYTR—SC'DTTT E Tt1ERESA 6P.0. 33X 451 7KODIA.< AK 93515 9 81200050140 P.D. 3DX 1285 USCG 6 KODII.A.K K 99619 r 2 4 5 6 8120005016;' 7 -MORR 1 if. D E NITS E—P A TRIC .i A 8 P.Q. 3.7X 2029 KODIAK 9 0 11 2 3 4 5 AK 99615 812)0060010 E', fO y A713`7rfiTN E}7ii.4 ��K •J OHISON P.u. 30X 152 NELS0N,F1AL AK 0615 0 1\TG CL ETS 'R 0 SCT) E P.O. 39X 42914 ANCH]RAGE AK 99509 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 'Zi P 8 ! A -R I j P.0, 3 ax 15 KO Ac 81200060040. R C :<ARrEl+iE 42 43 P.Q KO 0 52:::E tt P4.O.: 3t K00Ij R1200.060071 E fl�E E L�L K' 3 AK >99615:: R1200050120.; 10 C K -E R S D .ANTD `G E S-A hiD R A ,M P.0. 39X 3435 KODIA( AK 99615 6 1 2 1 t 3 R1200060130 4 Mt1ELL ±, ETTOEUE& hILEN 5 1513 <3°JS<OV 6 KODIAK. 7 9 0 1 2 3 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 4 5 AK. .9961.5 R1230070120 CARLSDV, r11LBE?/;.ATHERIME P.O. 33X 2344 KODIAK AK 99515 81200080011 K NcDRI7';KTPETER: --JL)D'iT! P.O. '33X 3081 KODIA AK 99515 Si Lor 1 Lo -r- 2-0 -r- 2_0 IST I jvcik Lorr-t 2 ..- \3 g Lot- t1\ 0 HI_ Z12HI_ oiSo OS10 Q 112 pCI a 17- 0_ 0010 131,2 Dia �1Z© op_ 0 0i0 I2 0 C>02,0 20o '7-0 0000 17-0 ooco !�o altq Oo(p 01C? i lZv ooGan 0 1 00(0 120 0o(o ".•••••••••••••S‘,. SUBDIVISION • ' • • • • ',.•••••• • • • • •.0.0.0.0.e,e.e.0.8.0. • ••••;44,.....0.....e.e.e.o.....0.0 • e at • • e • • • • 0 • . . . .....,.... .63: LANE SEL1EF ...... ......... • . ........... • MAI CASE 88-4)18 *Lot 18 131k 2 Leite Addition ••: . 4 ..... Variance 1515 Mission Road. ZONING KEY • fFSIDENTIAL RTI RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL R-3 RURAL RESIDENTIAL, -BUSINESS '" ; • l• 'INDUSTRIAL • CO NSE RVATION • PUBLIC USE LANDS : R=325' ST. 'c SELIG T. S E ONOF F , .,_ ? \-...,\ --,/ '// 7-77.' / N/ \,/,‘ .../.. \''.„, /As, ....\-Ni .........y',.....`. ....1‘:1\-----\ /1.--\" I -.71 ',..-\ /•----/\, / /\, /,‘„, \ ‘ • -/ • / / / / .„, ys,...N -,,, i -• \-- •`,---`t-- Iv -1\ ---\--is A RA N OF AV piookpARK RUE TI LAKE sueavisr • 0 4 0 7 t 4," 4D 4' • 4: ••060410414 HILL.jj WATERSHED ;-\\,.\--5>‘/\•,\/\,, , STREETW \„\ w S I MEONOFF REZANOF DRI VE 4qa "j\-'i•v.4.\**- I / • 1 S MAI LOV $t 80,v sioN US SURVE 2873 •AST 4Dpir ioN „.• CASH RECEIPT Kodiak Island Borough 710 UPPER MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 13009 RECEIVED . Cl*N.1/42 )1-..6 FROM DATE 7)- k 198X 13 OLLt - 000 - 101 - 10 - 00 010 - 000 - 105 - 01 - 00 010 - 000 - 105 - 06 - 00 010 - 000 - 1 1 1 -61 -00 010 - 000 - 107 - -00 040 - 000 - 371 - 11 - 00 040 - 000 - 371 - 12 - 00 010 - 000 - 368 - 51 -00 010 - 000 - 322 - 11 - 00 010 - 000 - 319 - 10 - 00 010 - 000 - 199 - 99 - 00 t • t CONDITIONS OF CHECK PAYMENT PAYMENTS TENDERED BY CHECK FOR THE BOROUGH ARE SATISFIED ONLY UPON THE CHECK BEING HONORED, RETURNED CHECKS FOR ANY REASON RESTORES THE OBLIGATION AS UNPAID AND SUBJECTS THE PAYER TO ANY CHARGES, FEES OR OTHER LEGAL LIABILITIES AS MAY BE APPLICABLE. CASH PROPERTY TAX, REAL PROPERTY TAX, PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX, LIENS PERSONAL TAX, LIENS LAND SALE, PRINCIPAL LAND SALE, INTEREST SALE OF COPIES BUILDING PERMIT PENALTIES, INTEREST ' CLEARING PER ATTACHED CC) 004— L-Etilx.• TOTAL op. BLIGATIONS DUE TO CASHIER Os PAYOR 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 (SO PAYMENT MADE BY: aa -HECK NO -\ CASH El OTHER FMOB-5I 1815 "i S. _!l4'J"D