Loading...
LEITE ADD BK 3 LT 9A - VarianceKODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CASE FILE CHECK LIST Case File No. Assigned FS -05/e Date Application Received 7//sV er Type of Application V Date Site Plan Received Date Fee Paid "Vis Amount 5-o Receipt Number l,i.o 3 Person Accepting Use Z for CUP for • LL for V for Zoning, Variances and Exceptions Conditional Use Permit Land Leases Violations 0 for all Other cases Appl. PEacrLiyom Name of Applicant Mailing Address P>o ACenemL 0l-11 e6 IkL. (0Y14, Name of Legal Owner Flailing Address N- %-3 71 Phone w 7-S74 Legal description of Property: Lot(s) Block 9A- 3 Phone Subdivision Len TE A-4)4,-rnodki Square Footage or Acreage of Property is P & Z Public Hearing Date 9--.14-4S1C- Public Notices Mailed on -/ Applicant Notified of P & Z Action on How Many? it (c'r`II Date Action Sunmiary Approved P & Z Assembly Ordinance No. Date Denied Ordinance Effective Date Date Tabled Date 1st Reading Date 2nd Reading BUILDING DEPARTMENT — CITY / BOROUGH OF KODIAK Applicant to fill in between heavy lines. APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT AND CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY BUILDING ADDRESS / ?/ IJ 1441CSI6 it( LOCALITY // 0 i4 j , NEAREST CROSS ST.. CLASS OF WORK NEW DEMOLISH ALTERATION ADDITION REPAIR MOVE USE OF BUILDING cc w Z 0 ARCHITECT ENGINEER NAME A6g O l 7%E 5 SIZE OF BUILDING HEIGHT MAIL ADDRESS/ 7/7 , /AA l/5/ DN CI( �{� /7' � Y�! NAM NO. OF ROOMS NO. OF FLOORS NO. OF BUILDINGS BUILDING PERMIT NO. VALUATION DATE ISSUED BLDG. FEE S 1 1 PLAN CHK. FEE TOTAL tai NO. OF BUILDINGS NOW ON LOT BUILDING PLUMBING ELECTRIC NO. OF FAMILIES FOUNDATION ROUGH ROUGH ADDRESS SIZE OF LOT FRAME SEPTIC TANK FINISH CITY USE OF BLDG. NOW ON LOT Kss SPECIFICATIONS PLASTER SEWER FIXTURES FLUES GAS MOTORS STATE LICENSE NO. CONTRACTOR NAVYC.l olt cr J O J Z 0 a.F- K U N 0. 'rex FOUNDATION FINAL FINISH FINAL MATERIAL. EXTERIOR, PIERS WIDTH OF' TOP WIDTH OF BOTTOM CIs17 rAtc. • DEPTH IN GROUND R.W. PLATE (SILL) STATE LI CENANO.! DF/)I SUBDIVISION ire-�'t) LOT NO. Pc BLK. 3 SIZE SPA. SPAN GIRDERS JOIST 1st. FL. JOIST 2nd. FL. JOIST CEILING `70L5 QEpsn l i tS 1A N----c-k) r F `'� Kl`moi✓ 90A.cGZU - . P5 -� (9 X0 ES C-CIA-Ere-AANA- pt' ``A -s -&L . `°A (04 C.5 --04.c3 INHS�Cr/ C� i PtZ U a-\ l e&/2_,<`-eF.2. s LAAr3� i � Amb UZ1 et Onl pr y 1' '(1H1 C-1 EXTERIOR STUDS DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE 1. Type of Construction I, II, III, IV, VVI 2. Occupancy Group A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I,JDiv. 1, 2,671, 3. Fire Zone 1.t INTERIOR STUDS ROOF RAFTERS BEARING WALLS 'Z Z) 2f 8 COVERING EXTERIOR WALLS INTERIOR WALLS FLUES ROOF �`• +JI 13 rxk.,;. 1L• FIREPLACE FL. FURNACE KITCHEN WATER HEATER FURNACE GAS OIL &.oc ( C/(F)1M Y 'To Lirl E 7"AL /3 EC c (. I hereby acknowledge this application and above is corre with all Cit Laws regul Annlirant that I have read s ate that the to comply .and State construction. 1 3N11 A1aI3dOHd PLOT PLAN H A 3NI1 A.Ll3dO1t1d STREET STREET Approved; CHIEF BUILDING OFFICAL .0 nn PLANNING & ZONING INFO. ZONING DISTRICT l� ' TYPE OF OCCUPANCYOAJ m X tir.3c, s-F_e,. / 7..is.060 - TOTAL HT. 35', AREA OF LOT 1 5 �(3 . FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM PROP. LINE /4,41 AMIN SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM PROP. LINE 'S AferrG 114 REAR YARD A.4 ,A pprov ZONIJ'/ MINISTRATOR F /. • Kodiak Island Borough Bob and Carol Smothers Box 646 Kodiak, AK 99615 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Smothers: P.O. BOX 1246 KODIAK, ALASKA 99615.1246 PHONE (907) 486.5736 August 23, 1985 Re: CASE 85-048. Request for a variance from Section 17.36.070 (General Provisions) of the Borough Code to permit the expansion of the cubical content of a nonconforming structure in order to replace and raise a portion of the roof on an existing single-family residence; and Request for a variance from Section 17.18.050 (Yards) of the Borough Code to permit a new raised roof to encroach 0.7 feet into the required 9.2 -foot side yard setback in an R1 --Single-family Residential District. Lot 9A, Block 3, Leite Addition; 1717 Mission Road. (Bob and Carol Smothers) The Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting on August 21, 1985, granted your request for the variances cited above and adopted the following findings of fact in support of their decision: 1. A. The unique physical condition in this case is the existing nonconforming structure located on the lot. Any expansion of this structure will require a variance. B. The unique physical condition in this case is the existing nonconforming structure located on the lot. Naturally, a replacement roof would have to encroach into the setback to cover the entire extent of the existing structure. The proposed additional encroachment only results from a steeper pitched roof. 2. A. The strict application of the zoning ordinance would only allow the existing roof to be replaced, not raised. This is an unnecessary hardship because if the existing house were oriented differently on the lot, no variance would be necessary. Also, the raised roof will not provide any additional usable living space or be substantially taller than the existing roof. B. The strict application of the zoning ordinance would only allow the existing roof to be replaced, not raised. This is an unnecessary hardship because if the existing house were oriented differently on the lot, no variance would be necessary. Also, the raised roof will not provide any additional usable living space or be substantially taller than the existing roof. • Bob and Carol Smothers August 23, 1985 Page 2 3. A. Granting of the variance will not result in material damage or prejudice to other properties in the area. The additional height of the roof results in only a minor encroachment (less than one foot) that will not increase the overall density of the area and, due to the location of the structure, will not block potential ocean views. B. Granting of the variance will not result in material damage or prejudice to other properties in the area. The additional height of the roof results in only a minor encroachment (less than one foot) that will not increase the overall density of the area and, due to the location of the structure, will not block potential ocean views. 4. A. Granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the comprehensive plan which identifies this area for medium -density residential development. B. Granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the comprehensive plan which identifies this area for medium -density residential development. 5. A. In this case, staff has reviewed departmental files and can find no indication that actions of the applicant caused the existing structure to be nonconforming from the required side yard setback. B. In this case, staff has reviewed departmental files and can find no indication that actions of the applicant caused the existing structure to be nonconforming from the required side yard setback. 6. A. Single-family residential use is permitted in this district. B. Single-family residential use is permitted in this district. An appeal of this decision may be initiated by any person or party aggrieved by filing a written notice of appeal with the City Clerk within ten days of the date of the Commission's decision. The notice of appeal must state the specific grounds for the appeal. Therefore, the Commission's decision will not be final and effective until ten days following the decision. Failure to utilize these variances within 12 months after its effective date shall cause its cancellation. Please bring this letter with you if you need to come into our office to obtain zoning compliance for any construction on your lot. • • Bob and Carol Smothers August 23, 1985 Page 3 If you have any questions about the action of the Commission, please contact me. Sincerely, 4 Robert H. Pederson Assistant Planner Community Development Department pb cc: 'Case No. 857048 Public Hearing Notice Respondents City of Kodiak Kodiak Island Borough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-1246 ebx Co4c, IS Aatr. Z/(7 5/6D1AW (3r- '9%(? ert.c.±)-$65 2E1.1%0,11 -CO C-W-rFe-OrS k i‘it, 1/9 isr,s— fd 1 ¥CI AT- 8S-oyP 8-6) 1. 4tt-) &w4Ln is -rte S'3 2 Yhf4-N6 •/G -2-o ifl�P -,oN 3. Tm,,Jcr PerkfrI$/�nt AD$e-(247 structures are larger an( ler than the existing structure, and the proposed addition will not block potential ocean views. Further, Lot 8, Block 8, Leite Addition was granted a variance to the side yard setback in 1984 (Case 84-064). 4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the comprehensive plan which identifies this area for high-density residential development. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance. In this case, staff can find no evidence from building permits and property file records that actions of the applicant caused the condition from which relief is being sought by the variance. 6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the district involved. Single-family residential land uses are permitted in this district. G) CASE 85-048. Request for a variance from Section 17.36.070 - -"(General Provisions) of the Borough Code to permit the expansion of the cubical content of a nonconforming structure in order to replace and raise a portion of the roof on an existing single-family residence; and Request for a variance from Section 17.18.050 (Yards) of the Borough Code to permit a new raised roof to encroach 0.7 feet into the required 9.2 -foot side yard setback in an R1 --Single-family Residential District. Lot 9A, Block 3, Leite Addition; 1717 Mission Road. (Bob and Carol Smothers) BOB PEDERSON indicated that 18 public hearing notices were mailed for this case and 3 were returned, all in favor of this request. Regular Session Closed. Public Hearing Opened: CARL BRAUNER appeared before the Commission representing the owners, Bob and Carol Smothers, defined the request and expressed support of the request. Public Hearing Closed. Regular Session Opened: COMMISSIONER RENNELL MOVED TO GRANT A VARIANCE from Section 17.36.070 (General Provisions) -of -the Borough Code to permit the expansion of the cubical content of a nonconforming structure in order to replace and raise a portion of the roof on an existing single-family residence. Lot 9A, Block 3, Leite Addition;-and.to , adopt the findings:contained in the staff report_as 'findings of fact' for this case. Also, MOVED TO GRANT A VARIANCE from Section 17.18.050 (Yards) of the Borough -Code to permit a new roof on an existing nonconforming single-family residence to encroach 0.7 feet into the required 9.2 -foot side yard setback in an R1 --Single-family Residential District. Lot 9A, Block 3, Leite Addition arid.to;adopt-the findings, contained in the staff report as 'findings of fact' for this case. The motions were . seconded and CARRIED by unanimous 4011 call vote. Findings of Fact: A -- for the requested expansion of the cubical content, and B -- for the requested 0.7 -foot encroachment into the required side yard setback as follows: P S Z Regular Meeting August 21, 1985 Exceptional physical circ Ines or conditions applicable to the property or intend:_se of development, which generally do not apply to other properties in the same land use district. A -- The unique physical condition in this case is the existing nonconforming structure located on the lot. Any expansion of this structure will require a variance. B -- The unique physical condition in this case is the existing nonconforming structure located on the lot. Naturally, a replacement roof would have to encroach into the setback to cover the entire extent of the existing structure. The proposed additional encroachment only results from a steeper pitched roof line. 2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships. A -- The strict application of the zoning ordinance would only allow the existing roof to be replaced, not raised. This is an unnecessary hardship because if the existing house was oriented differently on the lot, no variance would be necessary. Also, the raised roof will not provide any additional usable living space or be substantially taller than the existing roof. B -- The strict application of the zoning ordinance would only allow the existing roof to be replaced, not raised. This is an unnecessary hardship because if the existing house was oriented differently on thelot, no variance would be necessary. Also, the raised roof will not provide any additional usable living space or be substantially taller than the existing roof. 3. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health, safety, and welfare. A -- Granting of the variance will not result in material damage or prejudice to other properties in the area. The additional height of the roof results in only a minor encroachment (less than one foot) that will not increase the overall density of the area and, due to the location of the structure, will not block potential ocean views. B -- Granting of the variance will not result in material damage or prejudice to other properties in the area. The additional height of the roof results in only a minor encroachment (less than one foot) that will not increase the overall density of the area and, due to the location of the structure, will not block potential ocean views. 4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. A -- Granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the comprehensive plan which identifies this area for medium density residential development. B -- Granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the comprehensive plan which identifies this area for medium density residential development. 5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance. A -- In this case, staff has reviewed departmental files and can find no indication that actions of the applicant P & Z Regular Meeting -10- August 21, 1985 caused the existing icture to be nonconforming from the required side yard setback. In this case, staff has reviewed departmental files and can find no indication that actions of the applicant caused the existing structure to be nonconforming from the required side yard setback. 6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the district involved. A -- Single-family residential use is permitted in this district. -- Single-family residential use is permitted in this district. H) CASE 85-049. Request for a variance from Section 17.36.070 (General Provisions) of the Borough Code to permit the expansion of the cubical content of a nonconforming structure in order to construct a 10 -foot by 20 -foot addition on to the rear of an ,existing single-family residence in an RI --Single-family Residential District. Lot 3, Block 6, Aleutian Homesr 613 Hemlock. (Patrick and Nadia Mullan) BOB PEDERSON indicated that 132 public hearing notices were mailed for this case and none were returned. Regular Session Closed. Public Hearing Opened: Seeing none. Public Hearing Closed. Regular Session Opened: COMMISSIONER RENNELL MOVED TO GRANT A VARIANCE from Section 17.36.070 (General Provisions) of the Borough Code to permit the expansion of the cubical content of a nonconforming structure in order to construct a 10 -foot by 20 -foot addition on to the rear of an existing nonconforming single-family residence. Lot 3, Block 6, Aleutian Homes, and to adopt the findings contained in the staff report as 'findings of fact' for this case. The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll call vote. Findings of Fact; 1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or intended use of development. which generally do not apply to other properties in the same land use district. In this case, the unique physical condition is the existing nonconforming structure located on the lot. Any expansion of this structure will require a variance. 2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships. The strict application of the zoning ordinance would not allow any additions to the existing structure. This is a practical difficulty and unnecessary hardship when the encroachment is only 1.4 feet and the addition will comply with all current setback requirements. 3. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health, safety, and welfare. Granting of this variance will not result in material damage or prejudice to other properties in the area. A substantial number of structures in Aleutian Homes Subdivision are nonconforming, and a number of variances have been granted in the past by the Commission for expansion of the cubical content of these nonconforming structures. P 4 Z Regular Meeting -11- August 21, 1985 -r ITEM VI -G DANIEL . 1. FARRAR, D.D.S. '64L1-Qs- gesia,-cA; tti/;ant Ley) eser" o1 ii✓S u l� :kms te•ZJr �1u Ufa 5, .n,..0tlt..`s 1 Je 5 , 6 clo&e vne.i5,ltil4 1 C�rQ VI -e- r Nc rul-ct 461' 4 Q �k L c eos lcc.s� FLvPor <-C. PO, SOX 543 KODIAK, ALASKA 99615. TELEPHONE 907/486-3257 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH - Community Development Department 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 99615 ITEM VI- G PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTICE DATE: August 1, 1985 An application for Kodiak Island Borough Community Development Department by: Bob and Carol Smothers variances CASE NUMBER: 85-048 was filed with the _ a variande_from_Section_.7-3$.3070,-(General-Provisions),— - The application requests: of the Borough Code to permit the expansion of the cubical content of a nonconforming' structure in order to replace and raise a portion of the . roof•on an existing single-family residence;;and A variance from Section 17.18.050 (Yards) of the Borough Code to permit a new raised roof to encroach 0.7 feet into the required 9.2 -foot sideyard setback in an R1 --Single- family Residential District. Lot 9A, Block 3, Leite Addition; 1717 Mission Road. The Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a PUBLIC HEARING on this request at their regular meeting at 7:30 p.m. on Wednesday, August 21, 1985 in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska. The Commission will also review all items on their agenda for the regular meeting on the precedin& Wednesday at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Conference Room. This meeting is open to the public. You are being notified because you are a property owner in the area of the request. This is the only scheduled PUBLIC HEARING on the request at this time, and you are invited to appear before the Commission to express your opinion. If you cannot attend this PUBLIC HEARING and wish to comment an the request, fill in the bottom of this'notice and return it to the Community Development Department, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska, 99615. Your returned comment should be received PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED MEETING DATE. A vicinity map showing the property involved is included on the back of this form. If you have any questions on this matter, please feel free to call our office, Community Development Department, at 486-5736, extension 255.' YOUR NAME:/,[ //,� [� _ YOUR PROPERTY DEC IPTION: LOQ- 12. /3(✓< s- tie!), /7-dd ,' MAILING �62 -70 7 1y� ADDRESS: 4adie CY. COMMENTS: L_. om ndf jy) ow si ri on To the ( t7m f%errS re pps f crar A is Pori anal . Kodiak Island Borough RECEIVED AUG 1 6 t4,ic ,a� ALDERWOOO SUBDIVISION E • 1 PUR TOV • • IEF i \y,y����['FIMS'�E 5d 4:12;" ST RSit LAKE K gugpMflOM ALLMAN IT : n SEE' EE G . o• A••4• « ��t t • (��-(�]]• • I 11 J13.Y ,i1� i �I L fl 1 �1 S M€$ OfF �'7/1\.\\., , a0 1 `t\` I\1ft.. :ARA' -`A TREFltd. CASE 85-048 :..r 12--325 - L ^ \\.\ \L` \L $ ‘‘!„..•"..• LOT 9A, BLK 3 LEITE ADDITION =,_ Bob Smothers r} S REZANOF TC Ot (ALL W .9i - • 30,,.. .•:i. '8Dw1514N US SURVEY; 2873 I TC r-1 V - (G) EXIST/Mr CDOP LI NC 1717 MISSION EDS smantEKS UNLIMITED CONS r. 9C -4L- c 1" t 0 '-0" rutaM (6) 1 tr+44 't C4rt:5 t IIta4 NEW Robr `LINE (7)7 tvii551 4 —iiNt../miTE:D sc.ALE 1" -, to '-ex,- SMOTItt KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH' Community Development Department 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 99615 ITEM VI PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTICE DATE: August 1, 1985 An application for variances Kodiak Island Borough Community Development Department by: CASE NUMBER: 85-048 was filed with the Bob and Carol Smothers a variance.frcon Secrion_l7.36,070. (General Provisions) The application requests: of the Borough Code to permit the expansion of the cubical content of a nonconforming structure in order to replace and raise a portion of the roof -on an existing single-family residence;;and A variance from Section 17.18.050 (Yards) of the B6rough Code to permit a new raised roof to encroach 0.7 feet into the required 9.2 -foot side yard setback in an R1 --Single- family Residential District. Lot 9A, Block 3, Leite Addition; 1717 Mission Road. The Planning and Zoning Commiesion will hold a PUBLIC HEARING on this request at their regular meeting at 7:30 p.m. on Wednesday, August 21, 1985 in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska.. The Commission will also review all items on their agenda for the regular meeting on the preceding Wednesday at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Conference Room. This meeting is open to the public. You are being notified because you are a property owner in the area of the request. This is the only scheduled PUBLIC HEARING on the request at this time, and you are invited to appear before the Commission to express your opinion. If you cannot attend this PUBLIC HEARING and wish to comment on the request, fill in the bottom of this'notice and return it to the Community Development Department, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska, 99615. Your returned comment should be received PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED MEETING DATE. A vicinity map showing the property involved is included on -the back of this form. If you have any questions on this matter, please feel free to call our office, Community Development Department, at 486-5736, extension 255. YOUR NAME: i4MEs 1&asKo7TEz YOUR PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: COMMENTS: © K MAILING !!���� v ��%f ADDRESS: Fav)( /3/7 coo/AK 4 7 HiSS/ov Kodlok IsIond Rnrovnh Kodiak, Alaska RECEIVED ALDERWOOD •. ti•:" * •'" SUBDIVISION b••,. MADSEN eroisimpt, 0 20.40410. LILLY LAKE AIRMRK sueoivaloti Al L M AN • ♦ ' .• ••••'tlp ' • • , 4 •is,s4 I�pr iir t . A .4 :•{•'+Aµ11.L BAX R=-. . •• rt. • • ♦•• ,. .11A Q it ... ° r !! L�i ♦ e '��. *Al i MAj'Y 1%4 . �••r••1#lp_�!�lfY: • � •.a.. •' . . •' • • .. ♦ • • •+. �j\C�%%�%S,MfyQ :ARAt►CF •A STREf►W. CASE 85-048 =3251 �y .%% � 1.\1-X\\ ', `\; -\�-N LOT 9A, BLK 3 LEITE ADDITION =a Bob Smothers ' IiFEi37i 0 °CEANnt Sn,... _9/e, US SURVEY 2873. Kodiak Island Borough MEMORANDUM DATE: August 6, 1985 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Community Development Department SUBJECT: Information for the August 21, 1 85 Regular Meeting RE: ITEM VI(G) CASE 85-048. Request for a variance from Section 17.36.070 (General Provisions) of the Borough Code to permit the expansion of the cubical content of a nonconforming structure in order to replace and raise a portion of the roof on an existing single-family residence; and Request for a variance from Section 17.18.050 (Yards) of the Borough Code to permit a new raised roof to encroach 0.7 feet into the required 9.2 -foot side yard setback in an R1 --Single-family Residential District. Lot 9A, Block 3, Leite Addition; 1717 Mission Road. (Bob and Carol Smothers) Eighteen public hearing notices were mailed on August 1, 1985. 1. Applicant: Bob and Carol Smothers, Box 646, Kodiak, AK 99615. 2. Land Owner: Same. 3. Request: A variance from Section 17.36.070 (General Provisions) of the Borough Code to permit the expansion of the cubical content of a noncon- forming structure in order to replace and raise a portion of the roof on an existing single-family residence; and Request for a variance from Section 17.18.050 (Yards) of the Borough Code to permit a new raised roof to encroach 0.7 feet into the required 9.2 -foot side yard setback in. an R1 --Single-family Residential District. 4. Purpose: To allow the roof on a nonconforming single-family residence to be replaced and raised. The new roof will provide additional storage space because of its steeper pitch. 5. Existing Zoning: R1 --Single-family Residential. 6. Zoning History: The 1968 Comprehensive Plan identifies this lot as Residential Rl. Departmental files indicate no further activity. 7. Location: 1717 Mission Road. Lot 9A, Block 3, Leite Addition. 8. Lot Size: 18,613 square feet. 9. Existing Land Use: One-story single-family residence. CASE 85-048 August 21, 1985 10. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North: Potato Patch Lake. South: Lot 18B, Block 8, Leite Addition. Lands. East: Lot 8, Block 3, Leite Addition. Zoning: R1. West: Lot 11A, Block 3, Leite Addition. Residence; Zoning: R1. 11. Comprehensive Plan: The 1968 Comprehensive medium -density residential. Use: Vacant; Zoning: Public Use: Single-family Residence; Use: Single-family Plan depicts 12. Applicable Regulations: The following sections of Title the Borough Code are applicable to this request: this area as 17 (Zoning) of 17.36.070 General provisions. C. Repairs and Maintenance. On any nonconforming structure or on any building devoted in whole or in part to any nonconforming use, work may be done in any period of twelve consecu- tive months on ordinary repairs, or on repair or replacement of nonbear- ing walls, fixtures, wiring or plumbing, provided that the cubical content of the building as it existed at the time of passage or amendment of the ordinance codified herein shall not be increased. 17.18.050 Yards. B. Side Yards. The minimum yard required, on each side of a principal building, is ten percent of the lot's width but need not exceed twenty-five feet. COMMENTS: The purpose of these variance requests is to allow the applicant to replace and raise a portion of the roof on an existing nonconforming single-family residence. The new roof will provide an increase in the cubical content of the structure because of its steeper pitch. The new roof will also encroach into the required side yard setback. The existing single-family residence is nonconforming because it does not comply with the side yard setbacks of the R1 district. The existing structure encroaches 0.7 feet and 3.7 feet into the required 9.2 -foot setback on the left and right side yards, respectively. Expansion of the cubical content of a nonconforming structure and additional setback encroachments require variances, hence these requests. In order for the Commission to grant a variance, all of the following conditions must be satisfied for each variance: The staff analysis of each condition will be separately addressed for each variance --A for the requested expansion of the cubical content, and B for the requested 0.7 -foot encroach- ment into the required side yard setback, as follows: CASE 85-048 August 21, 1985 1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or intended use of development, which generally do not apply to other properties in the same land use district. A. The unique physical condition in this case is the existing noncon- forming structure located on the lot. Any expansion of this structure will require a variance. B. The unique physical condition in this case is the existing noncon- forming structure located on the lot. Naturally, a replacement roof would have to encroach into the setback to cover the entire extent of the existing structure. The proposed additional encroachment only results from a steeper pitched roof line. 2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships. A. The strict application of the zoning ordinance would only allow the existing roof to be replaced, not raised. This is an unnecessary hardship because if the existing house was oriented differently on the lot, no variance would be necessary. Also, the raised roof will not provide any additional usable living space or be substantially taller than the existing roof. B. The strict application of the zoning ordinance would only allow the existing roof to be replaced, not raised. This is an unnecessary hardship because if the existing house was oriented differently on the lot, no variance would be necessary. Also, the raised roof will not provide any additional usable living space or be substantially taller than the existing roof. 3. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health, safety, and welfare. A. Granting of the variance will not result in material damage or prejudice to other properties in the area. The additional height of the roof results in only a minor encroachment (less than one foot) that will not increase the overall density of the area and, due to the location of the structure, will not block potential ocean views. B. Granting of the variance will not result in material damage or prejudice to other properties in the area. The additional height of the roof results in only a minor encroachment (less than one foot) that will not increase the overall density of the area and, due to the location of the structure, will not block potential ocean views. CASE 85-048 August 21, 1985 4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. A. Granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the comprehensive plan which identifies this area for medium density residential development. B. Granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the comprehensive plan which identifies this area for medium density residential development. 5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance. A. In this case, staff has reviewed departmental files and can find no indication that actions of the applicant caused the existing structure to be nonconforming from the required side yard setback. B. In this case, staff has reviewed departmental files and can find no indication that actions of the applicant caused the existing structure to be nonconforming from the required side yard setback. 6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the district involved. A. Single-family residential use is permitted in this district. B. Single-family residential use is permitted in this district. RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds that these requests do meet all the conditions necessary for variances to be granted under Chapter 17.66 (Variance) of the Borough Code. APPROPRIATE MOTION: Should the Commission agree with the staff recommendations, the appropriate motions are specified below: A. "Move to grant a request for a variance from Section 17.36.070 (General Provisions) of the Borough Code to permit the expansion of the cubical content of a nonconforming structure in order to raise and replace a portion of the roof on an existing nonconforming single-family residence, Lot 9A, Block 3, Leite Addition, and to adopt the findings contained in this report as "findings of fact" for this case." B. "Move to grant a request for a variance from Section 17.18.050 (Yards) of the Borough Code to permit a new roof on an existing nonconforming single-family residence to encroach 0.7 feet into the required 9.2 -foot side yard setback in the R1 --Single-family Residential District, Lot 9A, Block 3, Leite Addition, and to adopt the findings contained in this report as "findings of fact" for this case." CASE 85-048 August 21, 1985 477 IIrkli 10101, . r '.,- R. i.. TARRANT _~ '; ..1.6:.4.,,:5.., .4:•• , : 1 hereby certify that 1 have surveyed the Scale: ,j ">r ..20 • ing_descr Y: 4c/7 .,ga/c/' oin and that the iinprovements situatedtherconarc within the property lints and do not overlap or encroach on t!m•.property lying adjacent thereto, that no improvements on property lying adjacent nceret encroach on the premises in question and. that there are no roadways.. transmis•. skin lines or outer visible 'easements an said property except .as indi- cated hereon. ,r • " / Dated this ,{ day of X 4 • l95 . 'ROBERT L..TARRANT Registered Land Surveyor Drawn by: eel,. 7:• . • .j Date: 7,607/415' ALDERWOOD' SUBDIVISION ••••„ • :LIE iz LANE: tau iBUR 70V• 7 aAAtt"iti MiggPM01111: LAKE. K SUODNISION .................... . ..... :. ........ ................ :::::::;:t ... ..... ALLMAN S MF,ONOF F Z /j/•i +,tom `�ri�a ARA.'Npf...'•A E.. R=32511 lAbO`• • us •: t� ° o • n + A w z W CASE B5-048 LOT 9A BLK 3 LEITE ADDITION'_ Bob Smothers ti 41!, a CI VE TC i OC E ANt.iE W US: SURVEY, 2873,:.. 115 C Pa, t - SO. POT VTOPNIC•ti LAKE •ti • , , 1 . . 5 ' L 0 0 R--,--- , J r • ---/ 7 A • i 1 5 A .2) 5 1V55 5-54,45--te '8 5 4 1 5 7 1. 0 M! 51ON -20A.D . . CERTIFICATE OF SIJRVEYOR. I hereby certify that this map 4ci . — — • ‘4. is 'lased -uron an actoll field sums, said survey havin,. "ten ex.ec.:ted•hy ne in with the instructions of the City of Kodiak, 'State of'. . Alaska,. arid that the courses and distarices. shown are - correct. • Dat t hi s day of Ai 1'b2. keristereirl'roThg-sional Eric:Inver X 1 aro surveyor AitifOVAI THE CI FY ot• KODIAK We the undersigned have checked the the. direction of _fares R. Harr as sh:A.:n cr.yrrectly portrays the information shown thereon instruceiiiirtvon—trnran by the City of Kodiak. conformitv SANITARY .SEWILR'SYSCEM :- NORTH 1:01:•:k IE A um TIori; City of Kodiak, Alaska' kit.,ht of way throurit Lot licsret •1 Sur. 1("1. res“its of the survey executed under this map and believe this map and that 13. conforms t.D the City of Kodiak / A t t es • Ci tv ftl-erk V - V 9 A-0 1.) G30907E0 • EASEMENT For and in consideration of the construction and maintenance of a public sewer, and for other good and valuable considerations receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Grantor Ted & . VictOri8 Cross a - ' owner in fee simple of the land described herein hereby grants and conveys to the Grantee, the City of Kodiak its successors and as- signs. the right, privilege and authority to construct, improve, repair and maintain a sanitary sewer system across, over and upon the following land, located in the City of Kodiak, State of Alaska, to wit: Lot _ 9 Block Leite addition The Grantor shall make no use of the land occupied by said sanitary sewer system that will interfere with its operation or maintenance._ In exercising the rights herein granted, the Grantee its successors and assigns, may pass and repass over said sanitary sewer system and may cut and remove brush, trees and other obstructions which in the opinion of the Grantee may interfere with the construction'and maintenance of said sewer system.The covenants herein con- tained shall run with the land -and are binding upon all subsequent owners thereof. The said sanitary sewer system shall lie within a right-of-way easement 5 feet either side of a center line described as follows: Beginning et a point on the Southwest boundary of Lot 9 Block 9 of the Leite Addition as shown on the plat entitled "Subdivision of a Portion of U.S. Survey#1681, Leite Addition" and recorded on page 133, vol. L. in the office of the "office of the District Recorder, Kodiak, Alaska; from which point the _South corner of said Lot 9 bears S30° 11$ s a distance of 96. �! . feet; thence ham' 141 G a distance of 50.0 feet more or less to the boundary of said lot. - All as shown on the plat attached hereto and made a part hereof. In witness Whereof, The. saidGrantor has executed this instrunie•t the day of 1963 4p .(o-2 c a-• Individual Acknowledgement (Alas_ka) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, - . STATE OF ALASKA �j SS, , THIS I5 TO CERTIFY that on this cac GD •C._day of 1963, before me the u atm Puh)h n and for th tate of Alaska, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared �"�— 14- -rpt c.ricY. •x -___s:'1 -70S -to me known to be the person described in and who executed the above and foregoing insUvment•and acknowledged to me that Z.. signed and sealod the same freely'and Vol- untarily for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. _ / ' WITNESS my hand and official seal the day and year in this ryificate first above written`.... Notary Public for AIaska, hay commission expires Watary Public for Alaska My Commission Expires 3-4.1965 • A L 0 « K 1 1 . i A - --z.k a --'n I . r :.T.1; ')'-/4•- t 5-4- ?sere to 1. iv& • • a 2. • —2 • .in • if ".,,s!.;'a • 5 5 0 N 20 A D N 5s 4s 30.; •til IsVI•N't T hereby cert i (y tthat thici map is hai:icit o;•01. an at ;;. ;'a1 i i field survey. said surveN, havini 'Weil exect•'. ed. 1;y r•t• in c on I ormit v / 'with the. ins! rlic t ion s pi-, the k..:i t y .n1 Kat lak , :.tale PI / iiiask a , and Hiii,\I;t he courses and di stance: -shown air. ,../5.%, I i'Airt ::1•.'..1... '.vs; i v. • Col: rfC t . , if • ..• /. eink• 11 1 ;; I .:••..--1 111 Moil Ilk): pat tsti t hi s_ta• • day of 6 • . • ...e,C.s..... it.•• :,. • • if v nt ',Nita.. , ..113‘01-a RI. it .-.1. ha,. , hr. -.);•,.}1 1 n . 9 11 1P1 Or I. ! rt. r ! i• 1 TrelartiTnr riricrl Ti rit;IFT;i; T. 3:7-.17:7:;-riliTi.if at -i i'ff 17: lirRiTri illtirtivAl fq• :!ir, :"1. v). ol 'nom Ak he the ;inder 1 :. n'' 0 have cher t.e.,1. 1. he I( s • 4 ! s ;;, ' h.. Ntrr'. t"., 0 %rt. : r 1 the direct i Olt ll ir ..! arlirS 4. gar r ;,s SIIC.V:Ir, r !' 1 It:1- nap and ':el a (-1. k• 1 Iii s na; ernrectly por t t avS t n e int ormat i no "dlowit i her eon and I ha 1 1; c oill nz ins t ..) i he rnst. rtaceRritr..- ":_yesit Iyha ill' hy the Cif v ni t ed i a k • , -"' . ! t, _ 'tayor. Pity 1:cidi I 1 a I V • V 6780 3 5 VA C.4 T/ON AND Lobs •* /D, ,ll, 4- 5y 4, 4 A/+ra A" oulortr,t d"'Z offArty erf Zig • AGssiar,,Rawy' a/00.9 saw' :dea nce Th " e JN :4r, Ls' 7S4iPagie '40:,13* /1' 7/1i+rtace 5 JO' •0.7 Td 'l Vr OF KODIA11 toe Original let Pins ti MISSION y ROAD • 1 Neff WNW TSRCD. V @Y l b4 tip uD 114A -r- Y A 'ii*Vaor ALi_ " D , H 1e DETAIL .. A G L.O. $fre# Cep .sdvsarwiratd react wud oho. Ary coo .+ S afro. maw- s.1' !VW s6,•64ey, g Tratst 46.,71 4>- (497!; NSG A►. b, U.S. 5.ww� E,vs iw1 G.L D. 416,w rpan/ C `•'ul si s4,441 '**.* I I - A CK • if*/1.4-'°e° 3 • • •••• :" 0 /.57-•,/ • MISSION Li-oenro • 8., 9-A • // 1/ . }-^ / • - , -r- t.: • . 7-r-• 6P' j • g C • 5 ...1* COR .5 A If P•$.7 !Z.", "•••e of •••• y 4-, .r.t" Or 5;.. ••,AV•-• •:•• Car.f.•,41 C.•• .4 7•;:::•- 7•• •"••••••e;,...., .:••• •••'•”.CCE.1.711.• ? • fr. 1!..• • 1••••••• • •-•.• • C.• - 5!, • V73CAr/NL-PZ.47 •-",4-5C•4VP77'.,,V Le.e, //, 4' .3, 6,5 4 7,, • • •••• SEL :o.z7- t.- - • --..,... 1 .yt,., 1...".., WY rl5,.7/r..••lArl PC...f. IS .. ; • ,ese 7,4 ..,___.. r0 Per: "ra , .76 .....5,Z',....'4-4„, • -., 7 V...EY1,14. 114 11 E. .5, •••• 4,.••••• .57 ......_•.,e,w_c A.„7 r..“.1- rs; I -:,. :....A7 kE:•-•;(C.SF.P..1"!... . , A. ,(.14-4,.• n: -....7c: .,aor ME. Ax.,6 1-1,s1 0171 nel 14.1 1.41 17 / A.,.... G. fe, r....,....• :Zs- 4.1.. ts...4C. 01-7,C, Pt r,C1,...1...f. L1 V. C -J•4171. ..•-• CY" • 41e, .6.; X • • (JR ent' C.S FriFtC.Ar:e ROAD •11 Ve.C•ift. IN,S1•., 1 I ; •••••.• • • ;', 1.;••'!•:•••;,.•,1 . • • .. .... 6•: •^. • • • *• PLAT" X: Ix: A??Sit.r.• _ 7--..e. %‘.11.1.• ••• • c -6 A. -Z. E7 ..Y 1••••.•••5. ( .977 • N. (...•• •-•••... •••• ( • • • • • „,/.7 , • •-• • • /,..4,•••• ze.. • • • .7 • 150S.C•IJC. VAC AT I ON of LOTS: 9.10.1. B LOC K 3 LEITE ADDITION REPLAT to LoTs: 9-t. BLOCK 3 LEITE ADDITION Kcdick ,."•!ost:c.• T • Kodiak Island Borough August 1, 1985 Bob and Carol Smothers Box 646 Kodiak, AK 99615 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Smothers: Re: CASE 85-048. Request for a variance from Section 17.36.070 (General Provisions) of the Borough Code to permit the expansion of the cubical content of a nonconforming structure in order to replace and raise a portion of the roof on an existing single-family residence; and Request for a variance from Section 17.18.050 (Yards) of the Borough Code to permit a new raised roof to encroach 0.7 feet into the required 9.2 -foot side yard setback in an R1 --Single-family Residential District. .Lot 9A, Block 3, Leite Addition; 1717 Mission Road. Please be advised that your application for variance has been scheduled for review and action by the Planning and Zoning Commission at their August 21, .1985 regular meeting. This meeting will begin at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska. Your attendance at this meeting is recommended. One week prior to- the regular meeting, Wednesday, August 14, 1985, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough conference room, the Commission will hold a work session to review the packet material for the regular meeting. You are cordially invited to attend this work session in order to respond to any questions the Commission may have regarding your request. • The Community Development Department will be happy to provide you with any additional information. Sincerely, Patricia Miley Planning Secretary Community Development Department cc: Case File pb Kodiak Island Borougl? 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-1246 1...._ 017.-....—„_--::__, -1,e1,-- 4-:::::17.-r-;-' ' AUG -1'85 g;,:sr..4 'N1 • " - - c " ',- ,..?i 41 [ i : 9141-n•li ''..--- rl 2 1.. .,.: r .i..9281331 k 1 A R1446000070 WES ARD P tOLEUM IND 1812 ONRD KODIAK AK 99615 7 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH Community Development Department 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 99615 ITEM VI- G PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTICE DATE: August 1, 1985 CASE NUMBER 85-048 An application for variances was filed with the Kodiak Island Borough Community Development. Department by: Bob and Carol Smothers a variance from Section 17.36x070 (General Provisions) The application requests: of the Borough -Code to permit the expansion of the cubical content of a nonconforming. structure in order to replace and raise a portion of the roof on an existing single-family residence;;and A variance from Section 17.18.050 (Yards) of the Borough Code to permit a new raised roof to encroach 0.7 feet into the required 9.2 -foot side yard setback in an R17—Single- family Residential District. Lot 9A, Block 3, Leite Addition; 1717 Mission Road. The Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a PUBLIC HEARING on this request at their regular meeting at 7:30 p.m. on Wednesday, August 21, 1985 in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska. The Commission will also review all items on their agenda for the regular meeting on the preceding Wednesday at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Conference Room. This meeting is open to the public. You are being notified because you are a property owner in the area of the request. This is the only scheduled PUBLIC HEARING on the request at this time, and you are invited to appear before the Commission to express your opinion. If you cannot attend this PUBLIC HEARING and wish to comment on the request, fill in the bottom of this notice and return it to the Community Development Department, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska, 99615. Your returned comment should be received PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED MEETING DATE. A vicinity map showing the property involved is included on the back of this form. If you have any questions on this matter, please feel free to call our office, Community Development Department, at 486-5736, extension 255. YOUR NAME: YOUR PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: COMMENTS: MAILING ADDRESS: ALDERWOOD •. SUBDIVISIO .r:.': 4.4'• 4'• .•.•...•.•. ♦i;t; KODIAK,C OF P.O. ?i 1397 Ki: AK R1200080181 AK 99615 00080182 KOOIAKsGIT P.O. 1397 AK AK 99615 FARRAR,DANIEL P.O. BOX 543 KODIAK R1200080183 AK 99615 R1446000060 BALTZOrSTANLEY E JOAN ST RT BOX 5232 WASILLA AK 99681 R1446000070 WESTWARD PETROLEUM IND 1812 MISSION RD KODIAK AK 99615 R1206030120 BLANKENBURG+ERi.,,-_; SUSAN P.O. BOX 707 :KODIAK AK 99615 R BLANKENBURG+ERI - SUSAN P.O. 80X- KODIAK AK 99615 k,R1200030010 BRADSHAW,JAMEr, iHIRLEY P.0 BOX 3530 KODIAK AK 99615 R1200030020 0130 CLARK+KIMIRLY-MYA P.O. BOX 2115 KODIAK AK 99615 R1200030141 LEE+BILL E HELEN P.D. BOX 2117 KODIAK AK 99615 R1200030160 ZIMMER/ARTHUR E ARLENE P.O. BOX 1592 KODIAK AK 99615 L- KODIAK+CITY OF • P.O. BOX 1397 KODIAK KODIAK.CIT +F P.O. B+ 1397 KOD •K R1200030171 AK 09615 R1200030172 AK 99615 R1200030173 ERDMAN,DONALO E SOPHY P.O. BOX 394 KODIAK AK 99615 ERDMAN,00 0 P.O. 394 -KO+ •K R1200030180 AK 99615 R1200080112 SIMPLER,ROBERT E SHARON P.O. BOX 2611 KODIAK AK 99615 ���200080113 SIMPLER ♦ OB IRT E SHARON P.O. BO 611 KOO AK 99615 R1200080120 LONGRICH+TIMOTHY E MARY_ P.O. BOX 2494 KODIAK AK 99615 R1200030031 ALASKA HOUSING FINANCE CO C/O NATL BANK OF ALAKA POUCH 7-025 ANCHORAGE AK 99510 R1200030040 OMLID+SID E DARLENE P.O. BOX 1161 KODIAK AK 99615 OMLID+SID E P.O. 8+ 16 KO °MLID'SI0 P.O. KO9IK 6 LOl+ENBERG+TERRY P.O. BOX 767 KODIAK 0 E 030052 AK 99615 81200030060 AK 99615 R1200030071 LACKEY,DELLA MAE P.O. BOX 1733 KODIAK AK 99615 RI200030080 BRUSKOTTER+JAMES E OENIS P.O. BOX 1217 KODIAK AK 99615 R1200030091 SMOTHERS+BOBBY & CAROL P.O. BOX 646 USCG KODIAK AK 99619 BLANKEN P.O. B+ 07 K0 1200030110 AK 9961.5 -7/•a38s k- Pao 9 I7A 1�7 17 `f0 -7r go 1�n a -v lap IGD 1 71 Ila, 173 R 000 30l 8© OSS a 873 tors' Ss, (, 000 go l 1 a., R I µ q 1.00 006,0 R -t Goo 0070 000 g©( T 10-•-•-• •• ♦.• •.•,• • • • • •-• •.t.. • • • ♦ • • • P• ••.. •• •. ••, •••, *••. •s• ••••• •.• •• ••:♦i••i•••;•••••••••••••••• •. •••. •. •�•••.••M•••••••••0•�•Rii••,•••,♦••••.•..1.•.•.•;••••••,•,•,.w •.•.1.•.•.•,.• LIE LANE ME PUR Mgt 144,4 DV ma :t�tAtT'.41 LY �-I �" LAKE A APIARK SUSDIv►sroK STREET ,E 85-048 LOT 9A, BLK 3 LEITE ADDITION Bob Smothers I\''i R=3259 DRIVE TC ()CEA US SURVEY X873. • MJULrtt. ISLAND BOROUGH 0 POST OFFICE BOX 1Z46 KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 ( ) Conditional Use Permit ( ) Exception &) Variance ( ) Zoning change: From: To: CODE SECTION INVOLVED: (1- 3o • 07v C- CC S— f u4 Stu^15) NOTE: The application fee for all items covered by this form is S50. Conditional Use Permits, Exceptions, and Variance Applications also require the submission of a site plan. APPLICANT: hA .Me5• [ jjj 6 40 l F4-EteS Name box (P4h Address ThA ., Ici CP• 3col( Home Telephone' 5--169 Work Telephone City, State, hip PROPERTY: y A 3 , t G4 CS Act DM Lot Bloc: Subdivision Name United States Survey 4 Section, Township, Range, S.M. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY: 5t N)CoI-L F.4 -SIX (4-411 PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY: FAME' ftVpr o,,-) ige.A.Acette.A5r. I have been advised of the procedures inclvec with this request and have received a copy of the appropriate re^_:::aticns. a Authorized Ac Cate Application Accep•ea: 7/5 AS— 3?: Date CASH RECEIPT Kodiak Island Borough ' ` 6603 700 UPPER MILL BAY ROAD P.O. BOX 1246 KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 NONE (907) 466.5736 FROM RECEIVED HONE /fJt'y DATE 19,5 T:tP"SS_ :Y:{ft )1.YY^C....,. _ -x.71 :-M... i''>h�Y�' CASH :.... - aI. (• #a_Eyp U ,- �sl i t otlo - tot tD -oo 010 - 000 - 105 - Ol - 00 PROPERTY TAX REAL 13..;; ;air^ 1'r.:::j,(+ ..:;11.�'F 2iri T+1Gt i �;r}g,{ ,L4.1...., cii..,%ra =� E• rit. It 010 - 000 ' 105 - 06 -.00 PROPERTY TAX, PERSONAL nR.`i1Rt8 4)1:10 1.i�C \ ' i.)J Jo?. r )‘*".52, ...W.> :••cU '�•6 • t)�. ,�'� c�(f7 S.):M'A 040 - 000 - 371 - 11 - 00 LAND SALE, PRINCIPAL lO;r1 Rtf. .- .•.141 (+j I'� •c.. A4; 040 - 000 - 371 - 12 - 00 LAND SALE, INTEREST 010_000_ 322 - 11 - 00 BUILDING PERMITS 010 -000 - 322 - 17 - 00 .ZONING PERMITS 010 -000 - 341 - 50 - 110 SALE OF MAPS • 17+U .C3.4. ��jj W1�1 Ttrl ct ,1L�(n( nth 'm, hi,'C' Eno(' F4 010_000_ 341 - 51 - 00 SALE OF COPIES Welt; yq.)'S.'4,T% ccc _1ct nf4...14 g7•-�Yr,.-L 010 -000 _ 111 - bl - 00 PROPERTY TAX, LIENS PER ATTACHED ,vb A 3$1' �`,�',• � cIli ,'4. iso -G '31; -a -aa � CONDITIONS OF CHER( PAYMENTS TOTAL PAYMENTS TENDERED BY OHC( FOR OBLIGATIONS DUE TO I OP THE BOROUGH ARE SATISFIED ONLY UPON THE CHECK BUNG TO ANY CHARGES, FEES OR 0111FR LEGAL EHECK NO HONORED. RETURNED CHECKS FOR ANY REASON RESTORES THE OBLIGATION AS FTI_ 7 Pre UNPAID AND SUBJECTS ME PAYER LIABILITIES AS MAY BE AMICABLE DCASH 1 1 1 PAYMENT MADE BY: PAYOR ❑ OTHER FM0E1511815