KODIAK TWNST BK 19 PTN LT 35 - VarianceAnthony Cristaldi, Jr.
Box 4301
Kodiak, Alaska 99615
Kodiak Island Borough
710 MILL BAY ROAD
KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340
PHONE (907) 486-5736
November : 18, 1986
•
•
Re: Case 86-010. Variance Request: Lot 35, Block 19, Kodiak Townsite
Dear Andy:
As you are aware, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted your'request
for a variance on February 19, 1986. Section 17.66.080 of the Kodiak
Island Borough Code specifies that failure to utilize an approved variance
within twelve (12) months after its effective date shall cause its
cancellation.
The purpose of this letter is to remind you that zoning compliance and/or a
building permit for your development must be obtained within the twelve
(12) month time limit or your variance will be cancelled. Since nine (9)
months have already passed from the date of approval of your variance,
please contact the Community Development Department as soon as possible so
that we may assist you in applying for the necessary permits. '
• I
If you desire further clarification of this matter, please don't'hesitate
to contact me at 710 Mill Bay Road or call 486-5736, extension 255.
Si:ce//
t H. P derson, Associate Planner
Community Development Department.
cc: Case File
(12A (AheteD Trcp*v) Ape SAIP
,rd•
-r-de5T OrEiL,QP\Ht5 AV( C2DI7--CO-Cr4*(1'2,7
Anthony Cristaldi, Jr.
Box 4301
Kodiak, Alaska 99615
Dear Mr. Cristaldi:
Kodiak Island Borough
P.O. BOX 1246
KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-1246
PHONE (907) 486-5736
February 20, 1986
RE: CASE 86-010. Request for a variance from Section 17.36.070 (General
Provisions) of the Borough Code to permit the expansion of the cubical
content of an existing nonconforming single-family residence in order
to replace and raise a portion of the roof; and a
Request for a variance from Section 17.19.040 (Yards) of
the Borough Code to permit the new raised roof and eaves to encroach
an additional 1.4 -feet into the required 5.74 -foot side yard setback
and also encroach into the front yard setback in a R2--Two-Family
Residential District. Lot 35, Block 19, Kodiak Townsite; 413 Rezanof
Drive West.
The Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting
on February 19, 1986, granted your request for the variances -cited above
and adopted the following findings of fact in support of their decision:
A. For the requested expansion of the cubical content; and
B. For the requested 1.4 -foot additional encroachment into the required.
front and side yard setbacks, as follows:
1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the
property or intended use of development, which generally do not apply
to other properties in the same land use district.
A. The unique physical condition in this case is the existing
nonconforming structure located on the lot. Any expansion of
this structure will require a variance.
B. The unique physical condition in this case is the existing
nonconforming structure located on the lot. Naturally a
replacement roof would have to encroach into the setback to cover
the entire extent of the existing structure. The proposed
additional encroachment only results from a steeper pitched roof
line.
Kodiak Island Borough
Anthony Cristaldi, Jr.
February 20, 1986
Page Two
2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical
difficulties or unnecessary hardships.
A. The strict application of the zoning ordinance would only allow
the existing roof to be replaced, not raised. This is an
unnecessary hardship because if the existing house was oriented
differently on the lot, no variance would be necessary.• Also,
the raised roof will not be substantially tallerthan the
existing roof.
B. Same as "A" above.
3. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or
prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to
the public's health, safety and welfare.
A. Granting the variance Will not result in material damage or
prejudice to other properties in the area. The additional height
of the roof results in only a minor encroachment (less than two
feet) that will not increase the overall density of the area and,
due to the location of the structure, will not block potential
ocean views.
B. Same as "A" above.
4. The granting.of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives.of
the Comprehensive Plan.
A. Granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives
of the Comprehensive Plan which identifies this area for High
Density Residential Development. -
B. Same as "A" above.
5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or
financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance.
A. In this case, staff has reviewed departmental files and can find
no indication that actions of the applicant caused the existing
structure to be nonconforming from the required side yard
setback.
B. .Same as "A" above.
Kodiak Island Borough
Anthony Cristaldi, Jr.
February 20, 1986
Page Three
6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land
use in the district involved.
A. Single-family residential use is permitted in this district.
B. Same as "A" above.
An appeal of this decision may be initiated by any person or party
aggrieved by filing a written notice of appeal with the City Clerk within
ten days of the date of the Commission's decision. The notice of appeal
must state the specific grounds for the appeal. Therefore, the
Commission's decision will not be final and effective until ten days
following the decision.
Failure to utilize these variances within 12 months after their effective
date shall cause their cancellation. Please bring this letter with you if
you need to come into our office to obtain zoning compliance for any
construction on your lot.
If you have any questions about the action of the Commission, please
contact me.
Sincerely,
Rdb e
• ederson, Assistant Planner
Community Development Department
Pm
cc: Case File
single-family residence in a R1--Single-Family Residential
District. Lot 20, Block 6, Aleutian Homes Subdivision; 518
Thorsheim Street. (Peggy Nekeferoff)
BOB PEDERSON indicated 71 public hearing notices were mailed for
this case and 1 was returned, in favor. Staff recommended
approval of this request.
Regular Session Closed.
Public Hearing Opened:
Seeing and hearing none.
Public Hearing Closed.
Regular Session Opened.
COMMISSIONER JAMES MOVED TO GRANT A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT in
accordance with Section 17.18.020 (Conditional Uses) of the
Borough Code to permit an office as a home occupation to locate
within the existing single-family residence on Lot 20, Block 6,
Aleutian Homes Subdivision and to adopt the findings contained in
the staff report as "Findings of Fact" for this case. The motion
was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll call vote.
FINDINGS OF FACT:
1. That the conditional use will preserve the value, spirit,
character and integrity of the surrounding area.
It appears that the proposed home occupation will preserve
the value, spirit, character and integrity of the
surrounding area. The home occupation (an office) will be
conducted entirely within the residence, the 'exterior of the
structure will not change and according to the applicant
only one customer at a time will call at the residence.
2. That the conditional use fulfills all other requirements of
this chapter pertaining to the conditional use in question.
The proposed home occupation will fulfill all other
requirements of the R1--Single-Family Residential District
(Chapter 17.18) such as setbacks and parking and the
definition of a home occupation (Section 17.06.320).
3. That granting the conditional use permit will not be harmful
to the public health, safety, convenience and comfort.
The proposed use will not be harmful to the public health,
safety, convenience and comfort because the character of the
surrounding area will not change and there_ will not be a
significant increase in traffic resulting from the home
occupation.
4. That sufficient setbacks, lot area, buffers or other
safeguards are being provided to meet the conditions listed
in subsections A through C of this section.
As the home occupation will be conducted entirely within the
existing residence and because only one customer at a time
will call at the residence, provision of additional buffers
or other safeguards are not necessary in this instance.
There is sufficient area on the lot for four to five
off-street parking spaces.
CASE 86-0.10. Request for a variance from Section 17.36.070
(General Provisions) of the Borough Code to permit the expansion
of the cubical content of an existing nonconforming single-family
residence in order to replace and raise a portion of the roof;
and a
Request for a variance from Section 17.19.040
(Yards) of the Borough Code to permit the new raised roof and
eaves to encroach an additional 1.4 -feet into the required
P & Z REGULAR MEETING
6 FEBRUARY 19, 1986
5.74 -foot side yard setback and also encroach into the front yard
setback in a R2--Two-Family Residential District. Lot 35, Block
19, Kodiak Townsite; 413 Rezanof Drive West. (Anthony Cristaldi,
Jr.)
BOB PEDERSON indicated 43 public hearing notices were mailed for
this case and 1 was returned, neither supporting nor opposing
this particular request. Staff recommended approval of this
request.
Regular Session Closed.
Public Hearing Opened:
Seeing and hearing none.
Public, Hearing Closed.
Regular Session Opened.
A discussion ensued amongst the Commissioners and Community
Development Department staff.
COMMISSIONER JAMES MOVED TO GRANT A VARIANCE fr-om Section
17.36.070 of the Borough- Code" -to -permit the expansion of the
cubical content of a nonconforming structure in order to raise
and replace the existing roof on the existing nonconforming
single-family residence in a R2--Two-Family Residential District,
Lot 35, Block 19, Kodiak Townsite and to adopt the findings
contained in the staff report as "Findings of Fact" for this
case. The motion CARRIED :by unanimous roll call vote.
COMMISSIONER KNIGHT;MOVED TO GRANT A VARIANCE from Section
17.19.040 of the Borough Code -to permit -a -new raised roof and
eaves to encroach an additional 1.4 -feet into the required'
5.74 -foot side yard setback and to encroach into the required
front yard setback in a R2--Two-Family Residential District, Lot
35, Block 19, Kodiak Townsite and to adopt the findings contained
in the staff report as '!Findings of Fact" for this case. The
motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll call vote.
FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. For the requested expansion of the cubical content; and
B. For the requested 1.4 -foot additional encroachment into the
required front and side yard setbacks, as follows:
1. Exceptional'physical circumstances or conditions applicable
to the property or intended use of development, which
generally do not apply to other properties in the same land
use district.
A. The unique physical condition in this case is the
existing nonconforming structure located an the lot.
Any expansion of this structure will require a
variance.
B. The unique physical condition in this case is the
existing nonconforming structure located on the lot.
Naturally a replacement roof would have to encroach
into the setback to cover the entire extent of the
existing structure. The proposed additional
encroachment only results from a steeper pitched roof
line.
2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in
practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships.
A. The strict application of the zoning ordinance would
only allow the existing roof to be replaced, not
raised. This is an unnecessary hardship because if the
existing house was oriented differently on the lot, no
variance would be necessary. Also, the raised roof
P & Z REGULAR MEETING 7 FEBRUARY 19, 1986
will not be substantially taller than the existing
roof.
B. Same as "A" above.
3. The granting of the variance will not result in material
damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor
be detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare.
A. Granting the variance will not result in material
damage or prejudice to other properties in the area.
The additional height of the roof results in only a
minor encroachment (less than two feet) that will not
increase the overall density of the area and, due to
the location of the structure, will not block potential
ocean views.
B. Same as "A" above.
4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the
objectives of the Comprehensive Plan.
A. Granting of the variance will not be contrary to the
objectives of the Comprehensive Plan which identifies
this area for High Density Residential Development.
B. Same as "A" above.
5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special
conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being
sought by the variance.
A. In this case, staff has reviewed departmental files and
can find no indication that actions of the applicant
caused the existing structure to be nonconforming from
the required side yard setback.
B. Same as "A" above.
6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a
prohibited land use in the district involved.
A. Single—family residential use .is permitted in this
district.
B. Same as "A" above.
G) CASE 86-011. Request for a variance from Section 17.36.030
(Nonconforming Lots of Record) of the Borough Code to permit a
clinic to locate on a nonconforming lot of record instead of only
a single—family residence in a R2--Two—Family Residential
District. Lot 24, Block 13, Aleutian Homes Subdivision; 714
Lower Mill Bay Road. (Richard Lien/Craig Johnson)
BOB PEDERSON indicated 36 public hearing notices were mailed for
this case and 2 were returned, opposing this request. Staff
recommended approval of this request.
A discussion ensued amongst the Commissioners and Community
Development Department staff.
Regular Session Closed.
Public Hearing Opened:
CRAIG JOHNSON appeared before the Commission and expressed
support for this request.
RICHARD LIEN appeared before the Commission and expressed support
for this request.
A discussion ensued amongst the Commissioners and Mi. Lien.
P & Z REGULAR MEETING
8 FEBRUARY 19, 1986
KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
710 Mill Bay Road
Kodiak, Alaska 99615
.ITEM VI -F
FEB 1 19136
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
A .public hearing will be held on Wednesday, February 19, 1986. The meeting
will begin at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road,
Kodiak, Alaska, before the Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning
Commiaiion, to hear. comments, if any, on the following request:
CASE 86-010. Request for a variance from Section 17.36.070 (General
Provisions) of the Borough Code to permit the expansion of the cubical
---content-of-an-existing-nonconforming-single-family-residence-in orcfft-fd
replace and raise a portion of the roof; and a
Request for a variance from Section 17.19.040 (Yards) of the
Borough Code to permit the new raised roof and eaves to encroach an
_ additional 1.4 -feet into the required 5.74 -foot side yard -setback and
also encroach into the front yard setback in a R2--Two-Family
Residential District. Lot 35, Block 19, Kodiak Townsite; 413 Rezanof
Drive West.
If you do not wish to testify verbally, you may provide your comments in
the space below, or in a letter to the Community Development Department
prior to the meeting.
You are being notified because you are a property owner in the area of
the request. If you have any questions about the request, please call
us at 486-5736, extension 255.
Your name: -btaKVP-Ocji Mailing Address: 1.36( IVI- Sr. 0c6,190i 41317/45._
Your property description: Lacs U 22 ) 0-0(-K" 0060t1L- ra,J,JS
Comments: WHI LC. 1-r- i4'r /0/20P6&rt
0144th, I'S <-31-r/Id Sr Illta-r 77-f1o.e Ai et &I-160.2 .
I-000 6E up6-e_A-oc.0 I Evc erxi
Aic,f&IVS61?,14do0 PIVellcUut2 S govc.0
1—c) Lu1-1-6171.Kie OR ,mr-
WILL _ ofistrWc-r-CA 1 Pe.W So". 091, (..7
0 4 Mo irr74 OE_ PElaoz-z f
O ¶7 -US SSUJ ILION (I.JG- A6 -110s1 Joe., ibur
cq,./773
is
-CASE 86-010 LOT 35 BLK 19 KODIAK TOWNSITE
413 Rezanof Drive West
Anthony Cristaldi, Jr.
R=325'
lv
(
US SURVEY 444
TrG
KODIAK TOWNS
USS 1534''
SMALL
N 31
1441
• NEW KODIAK
1 )2 c uen,/6 _ r>2ot-z&-J T J
GiSly -7744- _ItiH
(•71 T_ HAD
EIA -r
COULID
CL 6J iSS' _uCo 77eUc�-
¢JQL..,! F ) Li`l
S_ ors .- -,_ -1 LIA-sW � - �`- ac Jo
.0 _ .. _.. �7' - vim. /QC Souk CiI
i___ __. Jus.P_-_----c%q-J - ---
...S) r? I L72. C Gc- ua.. o./ _
r e .5 0(16,__._ Car _ r_ E i_Gl co_2J
(-�-- S 1 /Z ,.r . - - —
Ps -5.
1-1
V/)
YCxJ±ZS S)Jc' ��
I� \/fl V✓ZQG)/
Anthony Cristaldi, Jr.
Box 4301
Kodiak, Alaska 99615
Kodiak IslandBorough
710 MILL BAY ROAD'
KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340
PHONE (907) 486-5736
February 14, 1986
RE: CASE 86-010. Request for a variance from Section 17.36.070 .(General
Provisions) of the Borough Code to permit the expansion of the cubical
content of an existing nonconforming single-family residence in order to
replace and raise a portion of the roof; and a
Request for a variance from Section 17.19.040 (Yards) of
the Borough Code to permit the new raised roof and eaves to encroach an
additional 1.4 -feet into the required 5.74 -foot side yard setback and
also encroach into the front yard setback in.a R2--Two-Family Residential
District. Lot 35, Block 19, Kodiak Townsite; 413 Rezanof Drive West.
Dear Mr. Cristaldi:
Enclosed please find a copy of the materials, concerning the above -referenced
item, reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission at their regularly
scheduled packet review session held Tuesday, February 11, 1986.
If you have any questions or comments, please contact the Community Develop-
ment Department at 486-5736, extension 255.
Sincerely,
Patricia Miley, Secrekary
Community Development Department
Enclosures
cc: Case File
Kodiak Island Borough
MEMORANDUM
ITEM VI -F
DATE: January 29, 1986
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission 9����
FROM: Community Development Department449
SUBJECT: Information for the February 19, 1986 Regular Meeting
RE: CASE 86-010. Request for a variance from Section 17.36.070
(General Provisions) of the Borough Code to permit the expansion
of the cubical content of an existing nonconforming single-family
residence in order to replace and raise a portion of the roof;
and a
Request for a variance from Section 17.19.040
(Yards) of the Borough Code to permit the new raised roof and
eaves to encroach an additional 1.4 -feet into the required
5.74 -foot side yard setback and also encroach into the front yard
setback in a R2--Two-Family Residential District. Lot 35, Block
19, Kodiak Townsite; 413 Rezanof Drive West. (Anthony Cristaldi,
Jr.)
Forty-three (43) public hearing notices were mailed on January 31, 1986.
1. Applicant: Anthony Cristaldi, Jr.
2. Land Owner: Same.
3. Request: For a variance from Section 17.36.070 (General
Provisions) of ,the Borough Code to permit the expansion
of the cubical content of an existing nonconforming
single-family residence in order to replace and raise a
portion of the roof; and a
Request for a variance from Section
17.19.040 (Yards) of the Borough Code to permit the new
raised roof and eaves to encroach an additional
1.4 -feet into the required 5.74 -foot side yard setback
and also encroach into the front yard setback in a
R2--Two-Family ResidentialDistrict. Lot 35, Block 19,
Kodiak Townsite; 413 Rezanof Drive West. (Anthony
Cristaldi, Jr.)
4. Purpose: To permit the replacement of the existing roof with one
that has a steeper pitch.
5. Existing Zoning: R2--Two-Family Residential
6. Zoning History: The 1968 Comprehensive Plan identifies this area
as Residential --R2. Departmental files indicate
no further activity.
CASE 86-010
1 FEBRUARY 19, 1986 P&Z
ITEM VI -F
7. Location:
Physical: 413 Rezanof Drive West
Legal: Lot 35, Block 19, Kodiak Townsite
8. Lot Size: 5,626 square feet
9. Existing Land Use: Single -Family Residence
10. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
North: Lot 37B, Block 19, Kodiak Townsite
Use: Single -Family Residence
Zoning: R2
South: Rezanof Drive West
East: Lot 35A, Block 19, Kodiak Townsite
Use: Single -Family Residence
Zoning: R2
West: Lot 36A, Block 19, Kodiak Townsite
Use: Duplex
Zoning: R2
11. Comprehensive Plan: The 1968 Comprehensive Plan depicts this area for
High -Density Residential Development.
12. Applicable Regulations: The following sections of Title 17 (Zoning)
of the Borough Code are applicable to this
request:
17.36.070 General Provisions.
C. Repairs and Maintenance.
On any nonconforming structure or on any building devoted in
whole or in part to any nonconforming use, work may be done in
any period of twelve (12) consecutive months on ordinary repairs,
or on repair or replacement of nonbearing walls, fixtures, wiring
or plumbing, provided that the cubical content of the building as
it existed at the time of passage or amendment of the ordinance
codified herein shall not be increased.
17.19.040 Yards.
A. Front Yards.
1. The minimum front yard shall be twenty-five (25) feet unless
a previous building line less than this has been
established, in which case the minimum front yard for
interior lots shall be the average of the setbacks of the
main structures on abutting lots on either side if both lots
are occupied.
B. Side Yards.
CASE 86-010
2 FEBRUARY 19, 1986 P&Z
ITEM VI -F
The minimum yard required, on each side of a principal building,
is ten percent of the lot's width but need not exceed twenty-five
feet. The minimum side yard required on the street side of a
corner lot is ten feet.
COMMENTS:
The purpose of these variance requests is to allow the applicant to replace
and raise a portion of the roof on an existing nonconforming single-family
residence. The new roof will provide an increase in the cubical content of
the structure because of its steeper pitch. The new roof and eaves will
also encroach an additional 1.4 -feet into the required front and side yard
setbacks.
The existing single-family residence is nonconforming because it does not
comply with the side yard setback of the R2 district. The existing
structure encroaches 2.74 -feet into the required 5.74 -foot setback on the
one side yard. Expansion of the cubical content of a nonconforming
structure and additional setback encroachments require variances, hence
these requests.
In order for the Commission to grant a variance, all of the following
conditions must be satisfied for each variance. The staff analysis of each
condition will be separately addressed for each variance:
A.
B.
1.
For the requested expansion of the cubical content; and
For the requested 1.4 -foot additional encroachment into the
front and side yard setbacks, as follows:
required
Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable
property or intended use of development, which generally do
to other properties in the same land use district.
to the
not apply
A. The unique physical condition in this case is the existing
nonconforming structure located on the lot. Any expansion of
this structure will require a variance.
B. The unique physical condition in this case is the existing
nonconforming structure located on the lot. Naturally a
replacement roof would have to encroach into the setback to cover
the entire extent of the existing structure. The proposed
additional encroachment only results from a steeper pitched roof
line.
2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical
difficulties or unnecessary hardships.
A. The strict application of the zoning ordinance would only allow
the existing roof to be replaced, not raised. This is an
unnecessary hardship because if the existing house was oriented
differently on the lot, no variance would be necessary. Also,
the raised roof will not be substantially taller than the
existing roof.
CASE 86-010
3 FEBRUARY 19, 1986 P&Z
ITEM VI -F
B. Same as "A" above.
3. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or
prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to
the public's health, safety and welfare.
A. Granting the variance will not result in material damage or
prejudice to other properties in the area. The additional height
of the roof results in only a minor encroachment (less than two
feet) that will not increase the overall density of the area and,
due to the location of the structure, will not block potential
ocean views.
B. Same as "A" above.
4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of
the Comprehensive Plan.
A. Granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives
of the Comprehensive Plan which identifies this area for High
Density Residential Development.
B. Same as "A" above.
5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or
financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance.
A. In this case, staff has reviewed departmental files and can find
no indication that actions of the applicant caused the existing
structure to be nonconforming from the required side yard
setback.
B. Same as "A" above.
6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land
use in the district involved.
A. Single-family residential use is permitted in this district.
B. Same as "A" above.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff finds that these requests do meet all the conditions necessary for a
variances to be granted under Chapter 17.66 (Variance) of the Borough Code.
APPROPRIATE MOTION:
Should the Commission agree with the staff recommendations, the appropriate
motions are specified below:
A. Move to grant a variance from Section 17.36.070 of the Borough Code to
permit the expansion of the cubical content of a nonconforming
structure in order to raise and replace the existing roof on the
CASE 86-010
4 FEBRUARY 19, 1986 P&Z
ITEM VI -F
existing nonconforming single-family residence in a R2--Two-Family
Residential District, Lot 35, Block 19, Kodiak Townsite and to adopt
the findings contained in the staff report as "Findings of Fact" for
this case.
B. Move to grant a variance from Section 17.19.040 of the Borough Code to
permit a new raised roof and eaves to encroach an additional 1.4 -feet
into the required 5.74 -foot side yard setback and to encroach into the
required front yard setback in a R2--Two-Family Residential District,
Lot 35, Block 19, Kodiak Townsite and to adopt the findings contained
in the staff report as "Findings of Fact" for this case.
CASE 86-010
5 FEBRUARY 19, 1986 P&Z
cow/
RETaa'NrNi
YALL
1 hereby certify that I here surveyed the: Milo -ring described property:
L07"..75 3L43.5I V/5/OA/ Or LOT a s !!!.00.t 1.9,
KaO Aa.t. robvAlt..frE 5L44VE! _ u 5. ochwEY 2=`37-�
• . PLAT!' /W 60-1Z .. - •
and that the improvements situated thereonare within the property Lines
and do not overlap or encroach on the property lying adjacent thereto,
that no improvements on property lying adjacent Thereto encroach on
the premises in question and that there are no roadways, transmis-
sion lines or other visible easements on said property except as its&
:js,.�.-<r.@:�.'.'
Dared thi •/4_7-'4'' Ly
ROY ti ECKLUND -•�.
Reptatared Land Surveyor` ':'`-
•
•
:CASE 86-010 LOT 35 BLK 19 KODIAK TOWNSITE
413 Rezanof Drive West
Anthony Cristaldi, Jr.
ire
USS 1534
P
N 31
N 41
NEW KODIAK
Anthony Cristaldi, Jr.
Box 4301
Kodiak, Alaska 99615
Kodiak Island Borough
710 MILL BAY ROAD
KODIAK; ALASKA 99615-6340
PHONE (907) 486-5736
January 31, 1986
RE: CASE 86-010. Request for a variance from Section 17.36.070 (General
Provisions) of the Borough Code to permit the expansion of the cubical
content of an existing nonconforming single-family residence in order to
replace and raise a portion of the roof; and a
Request for a variance from Section 17.19.040 (Yards) of
the Borough Code to permit the new raised roof and eaves to encroach an
additional 1.4 -feet into the required 5.74 -foot side yard setback and
also encroach into the front yard setback in a R2--Two-Family Residential
District. Lot 35, Block 19, Kodiak Townsite; 413 Rezanof Drive West.
Dear Mr. Cristaldi:
Please be advised that the above -referenced request has been scheduled for
review and action by the Planning and Zoning Commission at their February 19,
1986 regular meeting. This meeting will begin at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough
Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska. Your attendance at this
meeting is recommended.
The week prior to the regular meeting, on Tuesday, February 11, 1986, at
7:30 p.m. in the.Borough conference room, the Commission will hold a
worksession to review the packet material for the regular meeting. You are
invited to attend this worksession in order to respond to any questions the
Commission may have regarding your request.
If you have any questions, please call the Community Development Department at
486-5736, extension 255.
Sincerely,
Patricia Miley, Secretary
Community Development Department
cc: Case File
Kodiak Island Borough
710 MILL BAY ROAD
KODIAK, ALASKA 99615.6340
:WOO 7 2 :I:OA 0 2:70 7
R L: TUFO TO 3END El::
NO FORWARDIN ORDE:Fi ON
!MAU EE TO FLAWk),R1-.)
I ins„,f1
110,4.0') R1340 L(9'232
WOOD E •
P•Os BO 3272 vokekm„
KODIAK AK .199 6 r5
,1:
KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
710 Mill Bay Road
Kodiak, Alaska 99615
ITEM VI -F
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
A .public hearing will be held on Wednesday, February 19, 1986. The meeting
will begin at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road,
Kodiak, Alaska, before the Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning
*Commission, to hear comments, if any, on the following request:
CASE 86-010. Request for a variance from Section 17.36.070 (General
Provisions) of the Borough Code to permit the expansion of the cubical
content of an existing nonconforming single-family residence in order to
replace and raise a portion of the roof; and a
Request for a variance from Section 17.19.040 (Yards) of the
Borough Code to permit the new raised roof and eaves to encroach an
additional 1.4 -feet into the required 5.74 -foot side yard setback and
also encroach into the front yard setback in a R2--Two-Family
Residential District. Lot 35, Block 19, Kodiak Townsite; 413 Rezanof
Drive West.
If you do not wish to testify verba ly, you may provide your comments in
the space below, or in a letter to the Community Development Department
prior to the meeting.
You are being notified because you are a property owner in the area of
the request. If you have any questions about the request, please call
us at 486-5736, extension 255.
Your.name: Mailing Address:
Your property description:
Comments:
•
,CASE 86-010 LOT 35 BLK 19 KODIAK TOWNSITE
413 Rezanof Drive West
Anthony Cristaldi, Jr.
R=325'
KODIAK TOWNS
00040"
Att A "
14.*4' ;V S°4 atteteati Anir
VWEiiir4t4 • rrilOy
#OtttttttAt"'"It" #
WO:110 • •
4441‘14444•4.4.414
USS• 1534
"•••:1177„."!
10%.*
;••.>4'4;,,,,
1-
0
US SURVEY 444
TrG'
•
U SS /637-"
ISLAND
6•-••••
"-• • •
N 31
N 41
• NEW KODIAK
27A
• R1340190280
PRYOR/JAMES & MARGARET
P.O. BOX 3031
KODIAK AK 99615
BRODIE/ROBERT
P.O. BOX 296
KODIAK
RI340190290
AK 99615
R1340190300
PERROZZI/JOSEPH E JANE
P.U. BOX 3696
KODIAK AK 99615
ZHAROFF,FRED
P.O. BOX 405
KODIAK
PERROZZI,
P.O. BOX
KODIAK
R1340190310
AK 99615
1340190320
ANE
R1340190330
HILL/TIMOTHY E, JULIE
P.O. BOX 2249
KODIAK AK 99615
DAMON/HI YONG
P.O. BOX 1784
KODIAK
R1340190341
AK 99615
R1340190342
MCCONNELL/DWAYNE W
P.O. BOX 928
KODIAK
AK 99615
R1340190351
CRISTALDI/ANTHONY&BARBARA
P.O. BOX 4301
KODIAK AK 99615
R1340190180
JONES/DUKE & DONNA
P.O. BOX 1604
KODIAK AK 99615
R1340190203
MONROE/MARY & LAURENCE
P.O. BOX 1729
KOOIAK AK 99615
R1340190220
VAVROCH/JOSEPH & MICHAEL
309 ALDER ST •
ARROYO GRANDE CA 93420
DAMON/HI YONG
P.O. BOX 1784
KODIAK
WOODLEY/MICHAEL
P.O. BOX 3272
KODIAK
SHORT, ROSE
P.O. BOX 4
KODIAK
SHORT,ROS
P.O.
R1340190231
AK 99615
R1340190232
AK 99615
R1340190233
AK 99615
R1340190234
AK 99615
R1340190240
COPELAND/KENNETH & SUSAN
C/0 ASSOCIATED INC
326 CENTER AVE STE 103
KODIAK AK 99615.
AL & CHERIE
te BOX 2203
IAK
•
JAEGER,' A
P.O.
SAN DIEG
0140040
CA 92103
R1220030110 ;
KAZIM COMPANY THE
P.O. BOX 746
KODIAK AK 99615
KAZIM CO
P.O. B
KODIA
NY THE
746
20030120
615
R1220030130 '
DICK,GLENN & VIRGINIA B
P.O. BOX 2182
KODIAK AK 99615
DICK,GLENN E
P.O. BOX 2
KODIAK
R1220030150
TURNER,SAJDAK & GERDEN
5491 MINNESOTA DRIVE
ANCHORAGE AK 99518
ABENA,TIMOTHY
P.O. BOX 2287
KODIAK
R1220030160
AK 99615
R1220030170
OMLID"S/ANDRENtL/FURINtG/
ANDREW,40Y/HALTER,LOREN
P.O. BOX 1700
KODIAK AK 99615
R1220030180 '
SHARRATT,GARY C LINDA
P.D. BOX 673
KODIAK AK 99615
B[SHOP,WIL
302 MARI
KOD A
40190361
A
THREINEN,C W JR
P.O. BOX 4172
KODIAK
PUGH"JOHN
P.O. BOX 685
KODIAK
AK 99615
R1340190371
AK 99615
R1340190372
AK 99615
R1340190382
HETTMANNtCHARLES
P.O. BOX 2056
KODIAK AK 99615
FILLMORE, KIP
P.O. BOX 3411
KODIAK
FI LLMO
P.O. B
KOe A
R1340190390
AK 99615
• GROTHE,LENHART
P.O. BOX 1504
KODIAK
FRANCISCOTJUDITH
P.O. BOX 483
KODIAK
190401
AK 99615"
R1340190402
AK 99615
R1340140011
AK 99615
R1340140012
KILLEN,MICHAEL 8E SUSAN
P.O. BOX 2868
KODIAK AK 99615
,.,...,
•
R1220030210
JAMES.LELAND P
ANCHORA •9503
JAM LAND P
3116 ILIAt
ANCHO E
R1220030220
AK 99503
R1100000130
PAN.ALASKA FISHERIES INC
C/0 CASTLE 6 GOOKE TAX DP
P.O. BOX 7330
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94120
URSIN.NORMAN
P.D. BOX 492
KODIAK
R1100000140
AK 99615
R1100000150
LARMAN CONSTRUCTION CO
2235 WEST HALLADAY
SEATTLE WA 98199
R1100000160
LARMAN CONSTRUC N'CO
2235 WEST ADAY
SEATTLE WA 98199
KODIAK.CITY OF
P.O. BOX 1397
KODIAK
URSIN.NORMA
P.O. BOX 492
KODIAK
R1100000180
AK 99615
R1340180190
AK 99615
R1340180201
KINNEAR E REED. INC
P.O. BOX 1272
KODIAK AK 99615
l.OT-►(o
'JurL -�
_
134. 0lq olio°
t 1 R., 1 a
UOT
NA
ti
f
Do 1
o
K.,\to 000
e 11 D occ' 0 l Bo
Digo
:CASE 86-010 LOT 35 BLK 19 KODIAK TOWNSITE
413 Rezanof Drive West
Anthony Cristaldi, Jr.
R=3251
KODIAK TOWNS
US SURVEY 444
Tr G
USS
B O
ISLAND
USS 1837/
SMALL
HA
N 31
N 41
NEW KODIAK
cC
•..,a rw.�•. •
4103.0.
. .34141 .s•,l Mt • 4141
41,,41 k.UO i. K ISLAND i;ORCUGH.
POST OFFICE 50X I246,5
ODIAK, ALASKA 99615
{ Conditional Use Permit
Exception
{ ) . Variance
•f' , s �' �E` ar
{) Zoning Change: From.
CODE SECTION : IP1VOLVED:'
NOTE: The application fee for all itemscovered by;this`form is $5O
Conditional Use Permits, Exceptions, and Variance Applications also requir
the submission of a.site plan, a 4141, err;
Address :Work;; TelephoneO 61 NIL:
w M i r
t ;
City.,_ State, Zip
tJc•Ni' q-tii k•
Section
4141 i,. United States Survey. Section, Township, Range, S.M
PRESEUT, USE OF PRQPERTY:
PROPOSED USE. OF PROPERTY:
`Yha' e been adv 'ec}'-4f the proct dur.s - ir:ea'
received a copy of. the, appropriate • regu;at;cns.
ic.tion ,ccepteo:
VARIANCE APPLICATION
application must contain a statement showing the following conditions, all four of which
it exist before a variance may be granted:
undersigned states:
That there are exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property,
or to its intended use or development, which do not apply generally to the other properties
in the same land use district. These special conditions are:
cord cluSt Crly ci o
t rir R,X15+) (00� L v - hod' }�2uv� SvCl.)Ss{ti.L
That the strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical difficulties
or unnecessary hardship: fy v2rsibIA, to ox1541�{ Siyy-CiNiY42. tiLow1 oCc,wr V,nits)
p ` ' Cd'te,
That the granting of the variance will not result in material damage or prejudice to other
operties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health, safety, or welfare
oecause: LA- ;3t UoGlu_d, - L\1L 1,oi' tSit-ti
That the granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the comprehensivf
plan, for the following reasons: tt
)TE: Alaska Statutes Section 29.33.110(C) states: "A variance shall not be granted because of
special conditions caused by actions of the person seeking relief or for reasons of
pecuniary hardship or inconvenience. A variance shall not be granted which will permit
a land use in a district in which that use is prohibited."
Please use additional paper for additional comments.
Ty, .rre of Authorized Agent
t:to
Signature Land Owner
0136
n.a.
Kpdiakisland Borou
00.UPPER MILL BAY ROAD 4.,
P.O. BOX 1244
•
KODAK, ALASKA 99615..-
',ritioNE(907)4$647
40--044U-,
0, ", •
• - - . • • -.
- 000 - 105 06 - 00
040 000 371,11'L 00 •
040 - 000 - 371%: 12 - 09
010 000 -322,-.11:; 00
010 - 000 - 17 100
. .
010 - 000 :1 34V'50 - 00
•610 000 - 341 00
010 000 - 111 61 00
LAND SALE; PRINCIPAL ;
LAND SALE, INTEREST
BUILDING PERMITS
, ZONING PERMITS
SALE OF MAPS
SALE OF COPIES
•PROPERTY TAX, LIENS
CONDITIONS OE CHECK PAYMENTS
PAYMENTS TENDERED BY CHECK FOR OBLIGATIONS DUE TO ' TOTAL