Loading...
LAKESIDE 1ST BK 1 LT 12B - VarianceKodiak Island Borough Community Development Department ZONING COMPLIANCE PERMIT /� rp 1. Property Owner/Applicant Zoning Compliance #: /J df / Mailing address' oZ�9 S y veli a / i v`e-.. Telephone #iv- 52( 2. Zoning Requirements for New Constructiion— Description of Proposed Action (attach site plan) Use of proposed structure(s) - ler/�-SU^�--r� `�c� ,tw�1/n�iGL�.1 la( g7--667- v Ii ,�,/ �ih G1�r� ac �U �— /7 0.) �a✓� Gw�G�� c, r�-e�u/i-c.cY �(/�vS�> 6 ; -W - Road access for emergency vehicles: Yes No -- Date /V k (contact Fire Chief for confirmation) Water supply adequate for public use, institutional use, commercial, and residential structures larger than a triplex: Yes No Date (contact Fire Chief for confirmation) yacro Lot area: Lot width* Minimum setbacks - Front: i'V 4- Rear. AI " Sides - Left: N4- Right AIA- fie..^ e-ee 'QL „ O 5i� ..... d Maximum building height Uk � r�� /,.. Maximum lot coverage: /Ilk' k' (J Number and size of parking spaces required* Off-street loading requirement: Plat related requirements* YVA-- C.L.-0‘1,4 / i.•- vse,o l,fi(n.4---3 Other (e.g. zero lot line, additional setbacks, projections into yards, 'screening, 'eLtc.): G v PrV" o V ex „rti.4 Q . 3. Legal Description of Property Street address: 2,2-ci' / /f Lot, Block, Subdivision: 4070 (2--/ 6 J 6G0 /j sd - le Survey, other (e.g. Township/Range)• Tax Code #• 1Q 7`-t' So co 2- 3 4. Description of Existing Property Zoning:I-F2' ZLI- Minimum Area: Use and size of existing buildings on the lot cozD 42( Minimum Lot Width* 4(0 SFS J3zL1 5. Consistency with Coastal Management Program _ - Applicable policies - Residential* �� Business* Industrial* Other. Proposed action consistent with Borough Coastal Management Program - Yes: No* If proposed action conflicts with Coastal Management Program policies, attach a sheet that notes the policy(ies), describes the conflict(s), and notes the)condition(s) attached to the consistency approval to mitigate these conflicts. Attachment - Yes No - 6. Applicant Certification I hereby certify that I will comply with all provisions of the Kodiak Island Borough Code and that I have the authority to certify this as owner, or representative of the owner, of the property involved. I agree to have corner markers in place for verification of setbacks. Signed* Ownei U� Date•X /1 -2 9 -(7°641 Support Documents Attached - Site Plan- As Built Survey Other 1h 7. Borough Staff App Signed* Title:.4— Date: THIS FORM DOES NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION WHEN A BUILDING PERMIT IS REQUIRED Distribution: White to File Yellow to Building Official - Pink to Applicant • Kodiak Island Borough Community Development Department 710 Mill Bay Road (Room 204), Kodiak, Alaska 99615-6340. Phone (907) 486-5736, extension 255. July 1, 1988 ,�1%�E // / ?4.crLio r-ktIaek,L..._.____a_‘ .______,-r / 4a4.01, -,-;. .- ..,,z_c_e -.E-Le€7t-- L--62______Iv-b,ye ___g__L.._ - W. O Uva ,cur.,.: w -e-- Cl- Lrtt...e.. P -e -C a.55 i fr Ub'-& 1..1-y �A'`U`� W 11 /Anf C thrix,4.A., . vLAv- ., o,..eo 4 u -+-Q— ( - U .e -e. V V ------ .00 - a. Ken Parker 2295 Beaver Lake Drive Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Kodiak Island Borough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 December 17, 1987 RE: CASE 87-067. Request for a variance from Section 17.54.010(A) and (C) (Height -Extension onto Public Property) of the Borough Code to permit a four (4) foot fence with a vertical surface of less than fifty (50) percent open space above a height of two (2) feet to project eighteen (18) feet into the Beaver Lake Drive right-of-way along Lot 12-B, Block 1, Lakeside Subdivision First Addition; 2295 Beaver Lake Drive. (Ken Parker/Kodiak Island Housing Authority/Kodiak Island Borough) Dear Mr. Parker: The Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting on December 16, 1987, granted your request for the variance cited above, subject to the following conditions: 1. The fence is constructed at the applicant's sole expense. 2. The applicant assumes any liability associated with said fence on Borough -owned property. 3. If at a future date the Borough determines that the fence must be removed from the Borough -owned property, the applicant or any subsequent owner of Lot 12-B, Block 1, Lakeside Subdivision First Addition, agrees to remove same without cost to the Borough. 4. Since the land is publicly owned, no prescriptive right accrues to the user. 5. Construction of the fence shall be in such a manner as to not reduce any required off-street parking. The Commission also adopted the following findings of fact in support of their decision: 1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or intended use of development, which generally do not apply to other properties in the same land use district. The exceptional condition applicable to the intended use of the property is largely a perceptual one. Typically, the average property owner assumes that all the land out to the sidewalk or roadway edge is their "yard," and that they should be able to erect a fence of reasonable height around that yard with any configuration of open space. In addition, if the fence was built along the property lines, strips of Borough property would remain outside the Kodiak Island Borough Ken Parker December 17, 1987 PageTwo fence. It is likely that this property would not then be maintained by the property owner which could constitute a public health problem. • 2. Strict applicationof the zoning ordinances would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships. Strict application Of the zoning ordinance would only allow the fence to be placed on the property lines and to a height of four (4) feet•the front yard with a fifty (50) percent open vertical surface above a height of two (2) feet. This is an unnecessary hardship when many other fences (some higher than 4 feet) in the community. have ,encroached on the public property without .first receiving a variance and many do not meet the fifty (50)- percent.open.space rule. , The Commission has also granted variances in the. past for fences to project into road rights-of-way and to exceed the maximum height requirements. 3. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare. Granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public's health, safety or welfare because the fence will not pose a line of .sight problem along Beaver Lake Drive either due • to its height, placement in the right-of-way, or percentage of open space. Also, the conditions outlined below ensure that any future removal of the fence will not impose a cost •to the public. The erection of the fence out to the sidewalk will hopefully ensure that the small strip of Borough property is maintained by the property owner to the benefit of the Borough. 4. The granting of the variance will not 'be contrary to the objectives of the •Comprehensive Plan. Granting of this variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan does not address minor structural developments such as fences. The main use of the property for residential purposes is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance. Actions of the applicant have not caused the conditions from which relief is being sought by a variance. The variance request will be decided prior to, • construction of the fence. • Kodiak Island Borough Ken Parker ' December 17, 1987 Page Three 6. That the granting.of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the district involved.. Fences are permitted in all land use districts. THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT ALLOW ANY CONSTRUCTION TO BEGIN. You must first obtain zoning compliance and/or a building permit. Please contact this office- for further details. An appealofthis decision may be initiated by any person or party aggrieved by filing a written notice of appeal with the. Borough Clerk within ten days of the date of the Commission's decision. The notice of appeal must state the specific grounds for the appeal. Therefore, the Commission's decision will not be final and effective until ten days following the decision. . Failure to utilize this variance within 12 months after its effective date shall cause its cancellation. Please bring this letter with -you when you come to our office tos. obtain zoning compliance for any construction on your lot. If you have any questions about the action of the Commission, please contact me. Sincerely, , RobertH. Pederson, AICP, Associate Planner Community Development Department ' 4. That sufficient setbacks, lot area, buffers or other safeguards are being provided to meet the conditions listed in subsections A through C of this section. The. 1.338 acre lot contains sufficient -lot area for the .proposed use, off_ street parking, and 'whatever. buffer. is required by the Planning and Zoning. Commission pursuant to Section 17.21.050(4.of the. Borough Code. . COMMISSIONER THOMPSON returned to the Planning arid Zoning Commission. E) CASE 87-067.- Request for a variance from Section .17.54.010(A) and (C) "(Height -Extension onto. Public Property) of the Borough Code to permit a four (4) foot -fence with a vertical surface of less than fifty (50) percent open space above a height of two (2) feet to... project eighteen (18) feet into the Beaver Lake Drive right-of-way. 'along Lot 12-B, Block 1, Lakeside Subdivision First Addition; 2295 Beaver Lake • Drive..' (Ken Parker/Kodiak Island Housing Authority/Kodiak Island Borough) .BOB PEDERSON indicated 5 public hearing notices` were mailed for this case and T was returned, .in favor of this request.. Staff recommended approval of this request, subject to five conditions of. -approval. RegularSession Closed. . Public Hearing Opened: Seeing and hearing none. Public Hearing Closed. Regular Session Opened. COMMISSIONER HENDEL MOVED TO GRANT -a request for a variance 'from Section 17.54.010.(A) and (C).of the Borough Code,to permit a four (4) foot 'fence with a vertical surface of less' than fifty (50) percent open space above a height. of two -(2) feet .to project eighteen (18) feet into the Beaver Lake Drive right-of-way in a R2--Two-Family Residential along Lot -12-B, Block 1, Lakeside Subdivision; 2295 Beaver Lake Drive, subject to the conditions of_ approval outlined in the staff report dated•December'3, 1987 and -to adopt the findings contained in, the -staff report 'as "Findings of, . Fact" for this -case. The motion, was .seconded and CARRIED by ' unanimous roll call vote: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1 The fence is constructed at the applicant's sole expense. 2. The applicant assumes any liability associated with said fence_• on Borough -owned property. 3.. If .at a future date the Borough determines that the -fence must-. be removed from the -Borough -owned property, the applicant or any subsequent owner. of Lot 12-B, .Block .1, .Lakeside Subdivision First Addition, agrees to remove same without "cost to the Borough. 4.' Since- the- land is publicly owned, no prescriptive right accrues to the user... ' _ 5 -'-Construction of the fence shall be in..such a manner as to not reduce; any required -off-street parking.' FINDINGS OF FACT . 1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to - the property or intended use of development, which generally, do not apply to other properties in the same land -use • district.: The exceptional condition applicable to_ the -intended use of -the property' is largely a perceptual one: Typically, the average property owner assumes that all the land'out•.to the. • sidewalk or roadway.edge.is their "yard," and that they should - be able to erect a fence of reasonable height around that yard Planning O. Zoning -.Commission with any configuration of open space. In addition, if the fence was built along the property lines, strips of Borough property would remain outside the fence. It is likely that this property would not then be maintained by the property owner which could constitute a public health problem. 2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships. Strict application of the zoning ordinance would only allow the fence to be placed on the property lines and to a height of four (4) feet in the front yard with a fifty (50) percent open vertical surface above a height of two (2) feet. This is anunnecessary hardship when many other fences (some higher than 4 feet) in the community have encroached on the public property without first receiving a variance and many do not meet the fifty (50) percent open space rule. The Commission has also granted variances in the past for fences to project into road rights-of-way and to exceed the maximum height requirements. The granting of the variance will not result- in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare. Granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public's health, safety or welfare because the fence will not pose a line of sight problem along Beaver Lake Drive either due to its height, placement in the right-of-way, or percentage of open space. Also, the conditions outlined below ensure that any future removal of the fence will not impose a cost to the public. The erection of the fence out to the sidewalk will hopefully ensure that the small strip of Borough property is maintained by the property owner to the benefit of the Borough. 4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Granting of this variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan does not address minor structural developments such as fences. The main use of the property for residential purposes is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance. Actions of the applicant have not caused the conditions from which relief is being sought by avariance. The variance request will be decided prior to construction of the fence. 6. That the granting of the variance`will not permit a prohibited land use in the district involved. Fences are permitted in all land use districts. F) CASE 87-056. Request for a conditional use permit in accordance with Section 17.13.030 (Conditional Uses) of the Borough Code to permit resource extraction activities (placer mining) in a C --Conservation Zoning District within a Portion of Section 13, Township 43 South, Range 35 West, Seward Meridian (approximately 80 acres within. Gold Seed Claims Number 9 and 10) on Tugidak Island. The resource extraction activities will consist of the primary mining activities on Claim Number 10 and base camp and processing activities on Claim Number 9. Intertidal beach sands will be extracted by a dragline bucket or loader. The extracted materials will be processed using a power screen -concentrator and magnetic separator. Processed materials will be returned to the -approximate point of origin and" recontoured by a bulldozer. The maximum quantities extracted and processed will be five hundred (500) cubic Planning & Zoning Commission 9 December 16, 1987 Minutes Kodiak Island Borough MEMORANDUM DATE: December 3, 1987 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Community Development Department SUBJECT: Information for the December 16, 1987 Regular Meeting ITEM VI -E RE: CASE 87-067. Request for a variance from Section 17.54.010(A) and (C) (Height -Extension onto Public Property) of the Borough Code to permit a four (4) foot fence with a vertical surface of less than fifty (50) percent open space above a height of two (2) feet to project eighteen (18) feet into the Beaver Lake Drive right-of-way along Lot 12-B, Block 1, Lakeside Subdivision First Addition; 2295 Beaver Lake Drive. (Ken Parker/Kodiak Island Housing Authority/Kodiak Island Borough) Five (5) public hearing notices were distributed on December 2, 1987. Date of site visit: December 3, 1987 1. Applicant: Ken Parker 2. Land Owner: Kodiak Island Housing Authority/Kodiak Island Borough 3. Request: For a variance from Section 17.54.010(A) and (C) (Height -Extension onto Public Property) of the Borough Code to permit a four (4) foot fence with a vertical surface of less than fifty (50) percent open space above a height of two (2) feet to project eighteen (18) feet into the Beaver Lake Drive right-of-way along Lot 12-B, Block 1, Lakeside Subdivision First Addition; 2295 Beaver Lake Drive. 4. Purpose: To permit a four (4) foot fence with a vertical surface of less than fifty (50) percent open space above a height of two (2) feet to project eighteen (18) feet into the Beaver Lake Drive right-of-way along Lot 12-B, Block 1, Lakeside Subdivision First Addition; 2295 Beaver Lake Drive. 5. Existing Zoning: R2--Two-Family Residential 6. Zoning History: The 1968 Comprehensive Plan identifies this area as Residential -Unclassified. Rezoned to RR by Ordinance 80-9-0. Rezoned to RR1 by Ordinance 83-15-0. Rezoned to R2 by Ordinance 85-99-0(A). Departmental files indicate no further activity. 7. Location: Physical: 2295 Beaver Lake Drive Legal: Lot 12-B, Block 1, Lakeside Subdivision First Addition CASE 87-067 1 DECEMBER 16, 1987 P&Z ITEM VI -E 8. Lot Size: 4,000 square feet 9. Existing Land Use: Zero -lot -line single-family residence 10. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North: Lot 5A, Block 1, Lakeside Subdivision 1st Addition Use: Zero -lot -line single-family residence Zoning: R2--Two-Family Residential South: Lot 5, Block 3, Lakeside Subdivision 1st Addition Use: Vacant Zoning: I --Industrial East: Lot 12A, Block 1, Lakeside Subdivision 1st Addition Use: Zero -lot -line single-family residence Zoning: R2--Two-Family Residential West: Lot 13A, Block 1, Lakeside Subdivision 1st Addition Use: Zero -lot -line single-family residence Zoning: R2--Two-Family Residential 11. Comprehensive Plan: The 1968 Comprehensive Plan depicts this area for Public and Open Space. 12. Applicable Regulations: The following sections of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Borough Code are applicable to this request: 17.54.010 Height --Extension onto public property. Fences and walls not exceeding six feet in height may occupy any portion of a side or rear yard in any R district, provided that where such fence or wall projects beyond the front yard line or setback line toward the front property line, the following further restrictions shall apply: A. Such fence or wall shall not exceed four feet in height, and shall be constructed so that no more than fifty percent of the vertical surface thereof above a height of two feet is solid wall; C. No fence, wall or hedge shall be erected or maintained on the public property beyond the front property line of any lot or parcel of land, except masonry or concrete retaining walls, and then only to a height not to exceed six inches above the grade of the earth such wall is constructed to retain. A permit shall first be secured from the building official approving the necessity for and type of such retaining wall. CASE 87-067 2 DECEMBER 16, 1987 P&Z ITEM VI -E Kodiak Island Borough Coastal Management Program: Not applicable for this minor action of constructing a fence. COMMENTS: The purpose of this request is to permit a four (4) foot fence with a vertical surface of less than fifty (50) percent open space above a height of two (2) feet to project eighteen (18) feet into the Beaver Lake Drive right-of-way along Lot 12-B, Block 1, Lakeside Subdivision. In order for the Commission to grant a variance, all of the following conditions must be satisfied: 1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or intended use of development, which generally do not apply to other properties in the same land use district. The exceptional condition applicable to the intended use of the property is largely a perceptual one. Typically, the average property owner assumes that all the land out to the sidewalk or roadway edge is their "yard," and that they should be able to erect a fence of reasonable height around that yard with any configuration of open space. In addition, if the fence was built along the property lines, strips of Borough property would remain outside the fence. It is likely that this property would not then be maintained by the property owner which could constitute a public health problem. 2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships. Strict application of the zoning ordinance would only allow the fence to be placed on the property lines and to a height of four (4) feet in the front yard with a fifty (50) percent open vertical surface above a height of two (2) feet. This is an unnecessary hardship when many other fences (some higher than 4 feet) in the community have encroached on the public property without first receiving a variance and many do not meet the fifty (50) percent open space rule. The Commission has also granted variances in the past for fences to project into road rights-of-way and to exceed the maximum height requirements. 3. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare. Granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public's health, safety or welfare because the fence will not pose a line of sight problem along Beaver Lake Drive either due to its height, placement in the right-of-way, or percentage of open space. Also, the conditions outlined below ensure that any future removal of the fence will not impose a cost to the public. The erection of the fence out to the sidewalk will hopefully ensure that the small strip of Borough property is maintained by the property owner to the benefit of the Borough. CASE 87-067 3 DECEMBER 16, 1987 P&Z ITEM VI -E 4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Granting of this variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan does not address minor structural developments such as fences. The main use of the property for residential purposes is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance. Actions of the applicant have not caused the conditions from which relief is being sought by a variance. The variance request will be decided prior to construction of the fence. 6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the district involved. Fences are permitted in all land use districts. RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds that this request does meet all the conditions necessary for a variance to be granted under Chapter 17.66 (Variance) of the Borough Code. APPROPRIATE MOTION: Should the Commission agree with the staff recommendation, the appropriate motion is: Move to grant a request for a variance from Section 17.54.010 (A) and (C) of the Borough Code to permit a four (4) foot fence with a vertical surface of less than fifty (50) percent open space above a height of two (2) feet to project eighteen (18) feet into the Beaver Lake Drive right-of-way in a R2--Two-Family Residential along Lot 12-B, Block 1, Lakeside Subdivision; 2295 Beaver Lake Drive, subject to the conditions of approval outlined in the staff report dated December 3, 1987 and to adopt the findings contained in the staff report as "Findings of Fact" for this case. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The fence is constructed at the applicant's sole expense. 2. The applicant assumes any liability associated with said fence on Borough -owned property. 3. If at a future date the Borough determines that the fence must be removed from the Borough -owned property, the applicant or any subsequent owner of Lot 12-B, Block 1, Lakeside Subdivision First Addition, agrees to remove same without cost to the Borough. 4. Since the land is publicly owned, no prescriptive right accrues to the user. 5. Construction of the fence shall be in such a manner as to not reduce any required off-street parking. CASE 87-067 4 DECEMBER 16, 1987 P&Z R3 RURAL RESIDENTIAL BUSINESS_ INDUSTRIAL* R=Spp 0/ I Lot 12-B 81 Rousing Au/Kodi��E Borough itY/KodZak Island 7 PUBLIC USE l . i'••• ••••• • • • i •'•'••• f •• ••••ff• :• •• •• •• •• •• ••• • •• •• •• • • •••••'• -t.'•••y'• • •'•••5 •...` • . • •• • • • Y 1\ rfr / 1 / i .�•.• SUR DARK LAE 1 • .•IA"_. /i \4j it ,�__•:. Ken Parker 2295 Beaver Lake Drive Kodiak, Alaska Dear Mr`s Kodiak Island Borough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 November 3, 1987 In reference to your conversationwith Bud Cassidy, Resource Management Officer, on October 30, 1987, about your proposed construction of a fence on your property located at Lot 12B, Block 1, Lakeside Subdivision First Addition, be advised that the Kodiak Island Borough has no objection to extending the proposed fence to the edge of the drainage ditch onto Kodiak Island Borough right-of-way, subject to the following conditions: 1. The fence is constructed and maintained at your sole expense. 2. You assume any liability associated with said structure on Borough -owned property. 3. If at a future date, the Kodiak Island Borough determines that the fence must be removed from the Borough -owned property, you or any subsequent owner of Lot 12B, Block 1, Lakeside Subdivision First Addition agrees to remove same without cost to the Kodiak Island Borough. Please take this letter to the Kodiak Island Borough Community Development Department when you make application for a variance from the Zoning Ordinance. Sincerely, Borough Mayor KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH , COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTDEPARTMENT 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 99615 "ITEM VI -E PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE DEC 3 1987 A public hearing will be held on Wednesday, December,16, 1987. 'Themeeting will begin at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, ' Kodiak, Alaska, before the Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission, to hear comments, if any,' on the following request: CASE 87-067. Request for a variance from Section' 17.54.010(A) and (C) (Height -Extension onto Public Property) of the_Botough Code_to_parmIt A four - (4) f�t fence with a vertical sur -face of less than fifty (50) percent open space above a height of two (2) feet to project eighteen (18) feet into the Beaver Lake Drive right-of-way along Lot'12-B, Block 1, Lakeside -Subdivision; . 2295 Beaver Lake Drive. (Ken Parker/Kodiak Island Housing Authority/Kodiak Island Borough) If:you do not wish-totestify verbally, you may providesyour .comments in the space below, or in a letter to the Community Development Department prior to the meeting. You are being notified because you area property owner in the area of the request. If you have anyquestionsabout therequest, please oall us at 486-5736, extension 255. . • Your Name: '17 5 Mailing Address: "'its- 4.1mr --itere4‘ Your property descrip on: Comments: ...e,KAWAteA, 25 . -HE-GEO/ED. DEC 71987 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMMT DEPT. IP; tat _ acs1DENTIAL ausinicss: • - INDUSTRIAL , conisrFtvolnotv is:7 pusLcusc LAN45 VPATERSHED 1 00 # n.Parker/kisland LARzsiDE 4/: Hodiak Housing Authority/Rodiak island Bo'rough • • • • • yr • • • • • • 1..0'. • • • • • • • • • • • • •' • • 010000°1114rirl.O. • • • • • 10.. 11."•'•••••••••••* .N.. 1..• .O. • •• V:0:>..." 11,.... P • . ,....*./.%.• . f / \ --..-,• ". • • '1 \ `... •-• 1 /...,—• .**-1 / •--/ 7-7 `,,-,-/ / e....--1 ...1./ \...., I /•.../ ,,,,,,. 1 ./....-+I N.-- I \ 'a I / •-• I - ' 1 /,..--1 /\ 1/ •--/ ,--1 /\-! •'' -.•/ / \-6'1 / \-4 -1 eiefi /\ •,..-- I /\ ,.. • 0 • SUR •••••.' 1 AKE LOOP ROAD onsqam OEUSEMEk DARK L,4 • • A NCROFT CR /12..„ * .... ........ /......... -- /1- ***** 1 \-- \ * ** , \—•:: 1":1\_:\ 1":"/ I \ • • \ • \ • Ken Parker 2295 Beaver Lake Drive Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Kodiak Island Borough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 December 2, 1987 RE: CASE 87-067. Request for a variance from Section 17.54.010(A) and (C) (Height -Extension onto Public Property) of the Borough Code to permit a four (4) foot fence with a vertical surface of less than fifty (50) percent open space above a height of two (2) feet to project eighteen (18) feet into the Beaver Lake Drive right-of-way along Lot 12-B, Block 1, Lakeside Subdivision; 2295 Beaver Lake Drive. (Ken Parker/Kodiak Island Housing Authority/Kodiak Island Borough) Dear Mr. Parker: Please be advised that the above -referenced request has been scheduled for review and action by the Planning and Zoning Commission at their December 16, 1987 regular meeting. This meeting will begin at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska. Your attendance, at this meeting is recommended. The week prior to the regular meeting, on Wednesday, December 9, 1987, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough conference room, the Commission will hold a worksession to review the packet material for the regular meeting. You are invited to attend this worksession in order to respond to any questions the Commission may have regarding this request. If you have any questions, please call the Community Development Department at 486-5736, extension 255. Sincerely, Patricia Miley, Secretary Community Development Department KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT . 710 Mill Bay :Road Kodiak; Alaska 99615 ITEM VI -E PUBLIC. HEARING NOTICE A public hearing will be held on Wednesday, December 16, 1987. The meeting will begin at.7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, .Alaska, before. the Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning - Commission, to hear comments', if any,- on the following request: CASE 87-067. Request for a variance from Section 17.54.010(A) and (C), (Height -Extension onto Public Property) of the Borough Code to permit -a four . (4) foot fence with a vertical surface of less than fifty (50) percent open space'above a height of two (2) feet to project eighteen (18) feet into the. Beaver Lake Drive right-of-way along Lot 12-B; Block 1, Lakeside Subdivision; . 2295 Beaver Lake Drive. (Ken Parker/Kodiak Island Housing Authority/Kodiak / Island'Borough) / • If yoU.do not wish .to testify verbally, you may provideyourcomments in the space below, or in a letter to the Community Development Department prior to the meeting. You are being notified because you -are a property owner in the area of the request. If you have any questions about the request, .please call us at 486-5736, extension 255. Your Name: Mailing Address: Your property description: Comments: • HcSI DENTIaL SusiNess ____..— I NDUSTRIAL CONSERVATION W I'U$I.IC USE ANDS WATERSHED R4=506, n Parker—LAXESIDE b nd g Autho ity K•_.. Borough dick •••...... • • .•• .� •• • . . • .•,'s :.'y-. • ••• SUR DARK L� \ig • f�f; f\,t`%\ 1 TI�i\l f i. -ti 1 y \ • f\_ i y\ 1 i t\�\i/. :` 'yam_\ - i! -: --I••• ' t�1i y\. 1/1 • elt\i\„../ \�\��_- 1,\��;i 1��\��.•-•\tel 6 1 2 5 6 9 10 11 12 3 4 5 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 87484030010 AK 99615 30 31 32 13 4 u , P.O. BOX KODIAK R7484030020 AK 99615 'CllU1A-K+�. P.D. BO KODIAK OF 97 fl 87475000080 — LDS —DU. C N E3 A C1T i s P.O.. BOX 2012 6 .KODIAK AK 99615 7 18 19 10 1 2 3 --F I`t�`tDS 4 P.O. BOX KODIAK R7484030030 36 AK 99615 19 28 29 30 R7484030040 31`<OITIA'K IS AND—`BDRDl7GH 32 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK AK 99615 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 30 51 52 .53 )4 55 56 57 58 39 i0 KG DI XTT 710 MILL KODIAK: R7484030050 5 RDrI--H ROAD AK 99615 0 172 R7475000090 A RUTH AK 99615 R7475000100 FIELDS 'ruONALti-K—E '?AlkSHi4 P.O. BOX 2695 KQDI AKAK 99615 xuDIA., 1 P.O. BOX 1397 KODIAK AK 99615 87484010030 2I `-* PA Z LK-Gargl<I 710 MI LL B KODIAK Y R R7484030060 ORO UGH AD AK 99615 PakiS 55 56 57 R7484030070 58 RO-U GH 59 710 MILL BAAD 60 KODIAK ' AK 99615 6 R7484030080 710 MILL B Y ;ROAD 2 KODIAK AK 99615 5 6 7 8 R7484030090 to KODIAK .:1 11 710 MILL 72 KODIAK B-0ROU 1.1 8...Y ROAD AK 99615 13 14 15 16.. 17 18 R.74.840301.00 -K- - 19 `KO DI -A S t 17"B-0 0 UG -F!. 20 710 MILL ESA ROAD 21 KODIAK / AK 99615 22 J. .. 23 24 25 26 27 R7484030110 28 -1(-0.011 29 ?10 MILL : 30 KODIAK ' Y 1 - ' 01.1G 1 -i • ROAD AK 99615 31 32 33 34 35 36 R7485000101 37 K-iD1A-K 1SL—H-S AUTHBRI-TY 38 2815 WOODY WAY 39 KODIAK AK 99615 40 41 42 43 44 45 R7485000102 46 -K� O I A -K-- -S-17- i UT }1O RI -TY 47 2815 WOODY WY 48 KODIAK t AK 99615 49 50 51 52......... 53 54 87485000103 55 0frtAK IS AUTHORITY 56 2815 WOODY WAY 57 KODIAK AK 99615 58 ....._. ,4 59 - 60 R7485000104 130/sqr„,, U55 Lo -r -3? lOPr - -1 • 1.-A-16sS (QC - k 7. 000 ogo - 4,14 5* 000 LO Lcyr I 1,sr PE: u<' Lcrr 0)1/4 L-oT I g 03 4030 01 qit.? Y-0-0 Ito 5000 LoI R-14 Co0D 1-31 Li-ta Ott) USS 51469, k 4-5 3000 00 RURAL RESIDENTIAL. • BUSS IyT/ql (NbusTRIAL CoNSER1ATIp pL$LIC USE LANDS WATERSHED..; Lot 8 - 12-13 2 Rot 12-13 Elk 1 LAKESID Housing Authority/Kodiakdlak Island R-500 , Is2and $orou9i ...J • .'. • 0 • ••• I ~I •:. • • • S. •/• \� 1 j 1- �.-.- ,l.-►.\. lid AKE. LOOP ROAD R�r 41. •6.3 �� • a6 • • so 1..1\1\-•''1!i\ \ , /I ..\l .• I! \ %-1-1---';';'- 1\" -'. ....... L \i1c1\-\i "11/IL,-i�•: 1� ,i\_ 1 IT'l!,r-•'4l,-%\—\;r {.'..!\ NUDiAK ISLA;iD BOROUGH ( POST OFFICE BOX 1246 KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 ( ) Conditional Use Permit ( ) Exception ()Q Variance ( ) Zoning Change: From: To: • a • CODE SECTION INVOLVED: I , o ( 0 ( )0et f+r- be-r&.sio c7J.3To ta. 84_1. NOTE: The application fee for all items covered by this form is $5O. _Conditional Use Permits, Exceptions, and Variance Applications also require the submission of a site plan. APPLICANT: )cV _5c1T utsciNtsp AAA-n-fatucy PROPERTY: Name Address City, State, Zip tAt:e...7.!;(1)E..-5LkE t Block Lot Home Telephone Work Telephone Subdivision Name United States Survey # Section, Township, Range, S.M. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY: PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY: e)"...)5-Ce.A.A.(--1 v- .EA:C4E_ D r t,Artz- a (kJ I have been advised of the procedu ir.velvea with this request and:have received a copy of the appropriate regu:aticns. Aucrized Agent. Date . Date Application Acceptea: BY: RECEIVED FROM CASH RECEIPT Kodiak Island Borough 710 UPPER MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 -000-101-10-00 010-000- 105-01 -00 010-000- 105-06-00 010-000- 111 -61 -00 010-000- 107- -00 040-000-371 -11 -00 040-000-371 -12-00 051-000-115-00-00 052-000-115-00-00 010-000-319-10-00 CASH PROPERTY TAX, REAL PROPERTY TAX, PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX, LIENS PERSONAL TAX, LIENS LAND SALE, PRINCIPAL LAND SALE, INTEREST WATER SEWER Ul a Cl if •a—'-14;, - PENALTIES, INTEREST PER ATTACHED L.(1�1`f .<`A LL •L� 12479 DATE 1 l _ \CI 1982 CONDITIONS OF CHECK PAYMENTS PAYMENTS TENDERED BY CHECK FOR OBLIGATIONS DUE TO THE BOROUGH ARE SATISFIED ONLY UPON THE CHECK BEING HONORED. RETURNED CHECKS FOR ANY REASON RESTORES THE OBLIGATION AS UNPAID AND SUBJECTS THE PAYER TO ANY CHARGES, FEES OR OTHER LEGAL LIABILITIES AS MAY BE APPLICABLE. TOTAL CASHIER ©s PAYOR 1 1 PAYMENT MADE BY: L_J CHECK NO. 342---2-- CASH I T OTHER FM08-511815 II