Loading...
KODIAK TWNST BK 18 LT 19A-1A - Variance (2)Ursin Seafoods, Inc. Box 492 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Kodiak Island Borough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 July 31, 1989 Re: Case 87-039. Request for a one (1) year extension for a previously approved variance that permitted an eight (8) foot chain link fence to project into the Shelikof Street right-of-way in a B --Business Zoning District. Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite, 410 Shelikof Street. TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: The Planning and Zoning Commission granted the request for a one (1) year extension for the variance cited above on July 20, 1988. Section 17.66.080 of the Kodiak Island Borough Code specifies that failure to utilize an approved variance within twelve (12) months after its effective date shall cause its cancellation. Since more than twelve (12) months have elapsed since the above-cited variance was approved and because zoning compliance and/or a building permit have not been issued for the proposed development, the variance is no longer effective. If you still desire to pursue your proposed development, it is necessary for you to apply for another variance from the Planning and Zoning Commission. This means that a new public hearing will be held on the request and that an additional fee is required. If you desire further clarification of this matter, please do not hesitate to contact the Community Development Department. Sincerely, Patricia Miley, Secretaryl Community Development Department Ursin Seafoods, Inc. Box 492 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Kodiak IslandBorough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 April 19, 1989 Re: Case 87-039. Request for a one (1) year extension for a previously approved variance that permitted an eight (8) foot chain Zink fence to project into the Shelikof Street right-of-way in a B -- Business Zoning District. Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite, 410 Shelikof Street. TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: The Planning and Zoning Commission granted the one (1) year extension for a previously approved variance request cited above on July 20, 1988. Section 17.66.080 of the Kodiak Island Borough Code specifies that failure to utilize an approved variance within twelve (12) months after its effective date shall cause its cancellation. The variance cited above will expire on July 20, 1989. If zoning compliance and/or a building permit for the development has not been issued on or before the expiration date, the variance will be cancelled. Since the expiration date is quickly approaching, please contact the Community Development Department as soon as possible so that we may assist you in applying for the necessary permits. If you desire further clarification, please contact the Community Development Department. Sincerely, Patricia Miley, Secretary Community Development Department 11 Ursin Seafoods, Inc. Box 492 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 r L, �t Kodiak IslandBorough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 July 21, 1988 RE: Case 87-039. Request for a one (1) year extension for a previously approved variance that permitted an eight (8) foot chain link fence to project into the Shelikof Street right-of-way in a B --Business Zoning. District.. Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite; 410 Shelikof Street. (Ursin Seafoods, Inc.) .To Whom It May Concern: The Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting on July 20, 1988,.approved the request for the review and approval cited above subject to the following conditions of approval: 1. The fence is constructed at the applicant's sole expense. 2. The applicant assumes any liability associated with said fence on city -owned property. 3. If at a future date the City determines that the fence must be removed from the City -owned property, the applicant or any subsequent owner of Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite, agrees to remove same without cost to the City. 4. Since the land is publicly owned, no prescriptive right accrues to the user. 5. Construction of the fence shall be in such a manner as to not reduce any required off-street parking or block the sidewalk. The Commission also reaffirmed the following findings of fact in support of their decision: 1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or intended use of development, which generally do not apply to other properties in the same land use district. The exceptional condition applicable to the intended.use of the property is largely a perceptual one. Typically, the Kodiak IslandBorough Ursin Seafoods, Inc. July 21, 1988 Page Two average property owner assumes that all the land out to the sidewalk or roadway edge is their "yard," and that they should be able to erect a fence of reasonable height around that yard. In addition, if the fence was built along the property lines, strips of City property would remain outside the fence. It is likely. that this property would not then be maintained by the property owner, this could constitute .a public health problem. 2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships. Strict application of the zoning ordinance would only allow the fence to be placed on the property lines. This is an unnecessary hardship when many other fences in the community have encroached on the public property without first receiving a variance. The Commission has also granted variances in the past for fences to project into road rights-of-way. 3. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare. Granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public's health, safety or welfare because the fence will not pose a line of sight problem along Shelikof Street either due to its height or placement in the right-of-way. Also, the conditions outlined below ensure that any future removal of the fence will not impose a cost to the public. The erection of the fence out to the sidewalk will hopefully ensure that the small strip of City property is maintained by the property owner to the benefit of the City. 4. The granting of the variance will, not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Granting of this variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan does not address minor structural developments such as fences. The main use of the property for storage purposes is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Kodiak Is and Borough Ursin Seafoods, Inc. July 21, 1988 Page Three 5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance. Actions of the applicant have not caused the conditions from which relief is being sought by a variance. The variance request:will be decided prior to construction of the fence. 6. That the granting of the variance will not permit prohibited land use in the district involved. Fences are permitted in all land use districts. An appeal of this decision may be initiated by any person or party aggrieved by filing a written notice of appeal with the City Clerk- within ten days of the date of the Commission's decision. The notice of appeal must state the specific grounds for the appeal. Therefore, the Commission's decision will not be final and effective until ten days following the decision. Failure to utilize this approval within 12 months after its effective date shall cause its cancellation. Please bring this letter with you if you need to come into our office to obtain zoning compliance for any construction on the property. If you have any questions about the action of the Commission, please contact Duane Dvorak of the Community Development Department. Sincerely, Patricia Miley, Secretary Community Development Department B --Business, C--Consery on, PL --Public Use Lands, and R2--Two-Family Residential Zoning Districts. The lines run from the Swampy Acres substation to the Tagura Road facility. (Kodiak Electric Association) COMMISSIONER HENDEL MOVED TO GRANT a two (2) year extension for previously approved exceptions and Variances that permitted 69 kV electrical transmission lines and towers (Cannery Transmission Line) to locate in B --Business, C --Conservation, PL --Public Use Lands, and R2--Two-Family Residential Zoning Districts. The lines run from the Swampy Acres substation to the Tagura Road facility and to adopt the finding of fact contained in the staff report dated July 10, 1984. The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous voice vote. FINDING OF FACT 1. .A11 the alternatives for this distribution line have been explored and the best alternative has been chosen. 0) Request for Planning and Zoning Commission review and findings pursuant to Section 17.21.050(C) (Performance Standards) of the Borough Code to (1) determine if Lot 17, Block 1, Airpark Subdivision shall provide and maintain screening where it is adjacent to a residential use or district, and (2) define the screening required by Planning and Zoning Commission. (Thomas W. Templeton) COMMISSIONER ANDERSON MOVED TO APPROVE that no screening must be provided and maintained between Lots 17 and 18 and Lots 17 and 16, Block 1, Airpark Subdivision, and to adopt the findings of fact contained in the.staff report dated July 11, 1988: The motion, was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous voice vote.' - FINDINGS OF FACT 1.* The size of the existing structure on Lot 18, relative to the size of the new business structure on Lot 17, makes the provision of screening redundant. - 2. The residence on Lot 16 is not oriented towards Lot 17, and the new business structure on Lot 17 is located on the opposite side of Lot 17's common boundary with Lot 16. 3. The proposed structure will not have a negative impact on the adjacent properties due to noise. 4. The new business building and parking as proposed (see applicant's letter) should not significantly impact the existing use or adjacent uses. 5. The entire property is already fenced to delineate the property boundaries. D) Case 87-039. Request for a one (1) year extension for a previously approved variance that permitted an eight (8) foot chain link fence to project into the Shelikof Street right-of-way in a B --Business Zoning District. Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite; 410 Shelikof Street. (Ursin Seafoods, Inc.) COMMISSIONER HEINRICHS MOVED TO GRANT a request for a one (1) year extension for a previously approved variance that permitted an eight (8) foot chain link fence to project into the Shelikof Street right-of-way in a B --Business Zoning District. Lot 19A, Block 18, Page 4 of 26 P&Z Minutes: July 20, 1988 Kodiak Townsite; subjec - the conditions of approval outlined in the staff report dated June 26, 1987; and to reaffirm the findings of fact contained in the staff report dated June 26, 1987. The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous voice vote. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The fence is constructed at the applicant's sole expense. 2. The applicant assumes any liability associated with said fence on city -owned property. 3. If at a future date the City determines that the fence must be removed from the City -owned property, the applicant or any subsequent owner of Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite, agrees to remove same without cost to the City. 4.• Since the land is publicly owned, no prescriptive right accrues to the user. Construction of the fence shall be in such a manner as to not reduce any required off-street parking or block the sidewalk. FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or intended use of development, which generally do not apply to other properties in the same land use district. The exceptional condition applicable to the intended use of the property is largely a perceptual one. Typically, the average property owner assumes that all the land out to the sidewalk or roadway edge is their "yard," and that they should be able to erect a fence of reasonable height around that yard. In addition, if the fence was built along the property lines, strips of City property would remain outside the fence. It is likely that this property would not then be maintained by the property owner, this could constitute a public health problem. 2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary_ hardships. Strict application of the zoning ordinance would only allow the fence to be placed on the property lines. This is an unnecessary hardship when many other fences in the community have encroached on the public property without first receiving a variance. The Commission has also granted variances in the past for fences to project into road rights-of-way. 3. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare. - Granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public's health, safety or welfare because the fence will not pose a line of sight problem along Shelikof Street either due to its height or placement in the right-of-way. Also, the conditions outlined below ensure that any future removal of the fence will not impose a cost to the public. The erection of the fence out to the Page 5 of 26 P&Z Minutes: July 20, 1988 sidewalk will hor lly ensure that the small strip of City property is maintained by the property owner to the benefit of the City. 4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the oblectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Granting of this variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan does not address minor structural developments such as fences. The main use of the property for storage purposes is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance. Actions of the applicant have not caused the conditions from which relief is being sought by a variance. The variance request will be decided prior to construction of the fence. 6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the district involved. Fences are permitted in all land use districts. There were no further audience comments or appearance requests. VI PUBLIC HEARINGS A) Case 88-026. Request to rezone Lots 39 through 46, Block 12, Aleutian Homes Subdivision from R1--Single-Family Residential to R2--Two-Family Residential; and Lots 17 and 18, Block 8; Lots 1 through 6, Block 11; and Lots 7 and 35 through 38 and 47 through 59, Block 12, Aleutian Homes Subdivision from Al—Single-Family Residential to B --Business in accordance with Chapter 17.72 (Amendments and Changes) of the Borough Code. On the north side of the street from 521 through 1119 Mill Bay Road and 111 Birch Street (from Thwing's old key shop to the old Harvester building site). (Property Owners) (Tabled from the May and June 1988 Regular Meetings) LINDA FREED indicated three hundred fifty-one (351) public hearing notices were distributed on May 4 and June 3, 1988, for a total of 702 public hearing notices distributed. No public hearing notices were distributed for the July meeting. Two (2) display ads were published on July 6th and 13th in the Kodiak Daily Mirror encouraging public comments. Of the public hearing notices distributed, 19 were returned (several from the same property owners), 5 were in favor, 9 opposing, and 5 expressing nonobjection to this request. Staff recommended that the Commission forward the request to the Assembly recommending approval of this rezone. In response to a request by the Commission, letters from the City of Kodiak and the Kodiak Island Borough School District had been received and were included with the packet materials. Staff also noted that property owners (or their representatives) of four (4) lots (Lots 47, 48, 49 and 50, Block 12) had recently requested that their lots be rezoned to R2 and not Business as had previously been requested. Regular Session Closed. Public Hearing Opened: Page 6 of 26• P&Z Minutes: July 20, 1988 Ursin Seafoods, Inc. Box 492 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Kodiak Island Borough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340. PHONE (907) 486-5736 .July 14, 1988 RE: Case 87-039. Request for a one (1) year extension for a previously approved variance that permitted 'an eight (8), foot chain link fence to project into the Shelikof Street right-of-way in a B --Business Zoning District. Lot 19A, ' Block 18, Kodiak Townsite; 410 Shelikof Street. (Ursin Seafoods, Inc. To Whom It May Concern: Enclosed please find a copy of the materials, concerning the above referenced item, reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission at their regularly scheduled packet review worksession held Wednesday, July 13, 1988. If you have any questions or comments, please contact the Community Development Department at 486-5736, extension 255. Sincerely, Patricia Milay, Seclretary Community Development Department enclosures Kodiak Island Borough MEMORANDUM DATE: July 13, 1988 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Community Development Department SUBJ: Information for the July 20, 1988 Regular Meeting RE: BACKGROUND ITEM V -D Case 87-039. Request for a one (1) year extension for a previously approved variance that permitted an eight (8) foot chain link fence to project into the Shelikof Street right-of-way in a B --Business Zoning District. Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite; 410 Shelikof Street. (Ursin Seafoods, Inc.) Staff has reviewed the staff report upon which the original approval of Case 87-039 was made. Staff finds no indications of significant change that would alter the conditions of the site from what was existing at that time. The original staff report is attached for reference. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Commission grant a one (1) year extension for the variance previously approved by Case 87-039. APPROPRIATE MOTION If the Commission agrees with the staff recommendation, the appropriate motion is: Move to grant a request for a one (1) year extension for a previously approved variance that permitted an eight (8) foot chain link fence to project into the Shelikof Street right-of-way in a B --Business Zoning District. Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite; subject to the conditions of approval outlined in the staff report dated June 26, 1987; and to reaffirm the findings of fact contained in the staff report dated June 26, 1987. Case 87-039 1 P&Z: July 20, 1988 Kodiak Island Borough MEMORANDUM DATE: June 26, 1987 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Community Development Department SUBJECT: Information for the July 15, 1987 Regular Meeting RE: ITEM VI—E CASE 87-039. Request for a variance from Section 17.54.010(C) (Height - Extension onto Public Property) of the Borough Code to permit an eight (8) foot chain link fence to project into the Shelikof Street right-of-way in a B --Business Zoning District. Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsitg; 410 Shelikof Street. (Ursin Seafoods, Thirty-one (31) public hearing notices were mailed on June 30, 1987. Date of site visit: June 23, 1987. 1. Applicant: Ursin Seafoods, Inc. 2. Land Owner: Same. 3. Request: For a variance from Section 17.54.010(C) (Height - Extension onto Public Property) of the Borough Code to permit ap eight (8) foot chain link fence to project into the Shelikof Street right-of-way in a B --Business Zoning District. 4. Purpose: To permit an eight (8) foot chain link fence to locate within the Shelikof Street right-of-way. 5. Existing Zoning: B --Business 6. Zoning History: The 1968 Comprehensive Plan identifies this area as Business. Departmental files indicate no further activity. 7. Location: Physical: 410 Shelikof Street Legal: Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite 8. Lot Size: 15,550 square feet 9. Existing Land Use: Outdoor storage. CASE 87-039 1 JULY 15, 1987 P&Z . i ITEM VI -E 10. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North: Across Rezanof - Lot 39A, Block 19, Kodiak Townsite Use: Duplex Zoning: R2--Two-Family Residential South: City Tidelands Tract N-22 Use: Industrial Zoning: I --Industrial East: Lot 22, Block 3, New Kodiak Use: Commercial Zoning: B --Business West: Lot 20B, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite Use: Commercial (Anchor Bar) Zoning: B --Business 11. Comprehensive Plan: The 1968 Comprehensive Plan depicts this area for Heavy Industrial Development. 12. Applicable Regulations: The following sections of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Borough Code are applicable to this request: 17.54.010 Height --Extension onto public property. Fences: and walls not exceeding six feet in height may occupy any portion of a side or rear yard in any R district, provided that where such fence or wall projects beyond the front yard line or setback line toward the front property line, the following further restrictions shall apply: C. No fence, wall or hedge shall be erected or maintained on the public property beyond the front property line of any lot or parcel ofl land, except masonry or concrete retaining walls, and then only to aLheight not to exceed six inches above the grade of the earth such wall is constructed to retain. A permit shall first be secured from the building official approving the necessity for and type of such retaining wall. COASTAL MANAGEMENT APPLICABLE POLICIES Business Development 1. Natural Features Dredge and fill, excavation, shoreline alteration 'and disturbance of anadromous streams, tideflats and wetlands shall be 'minimized when constructing and operating port, harbor, dock, industrial and energy facilities - if permitted under applicable regulations. Consistent: Not applicable. This action does not include the above referenced facilities. CASE 87-039 2 JULY 15, 1987 P&Z ITEM VI -E 2. Natural Setting, Views and Access Development shall be conducted in a manner that mitigates adverse impacts upon the Kodiak Archipelago; developers shall provide opportunities for public access to the shoreline and scenic views, to the extent feasibleand prudent. Consistent: Not'applicable. The property is not located along the shoreline or in a scenic area. 3. Dredge and Excavation Material Dredging and filling shall be consistent with ACMP Standards16 AAC 80.040 (Coastal Development) and 6 AAC 80.110 (Mineral and Mining Processing). Dredge spoil may be utilized in shoreside landfills if permitted under applicable regulations for the purpose of creating usable waterfront land. Consistent: Not applicable. This action does not involve dredging or filling activities. 4. Facility Design Developments in or over the water, such as piers structures shall be located, designed and mainta prevents adverse impacts upon water quality, vegetative resources and minimizes interruption patterns, coastal processes and navigation. docks and protective ned in a manner that fish, wildlife, and of water circulation Consistent: Not applicable. This action does not involve development in or over the water. 5. Buffer Zones Buffer zones shall beestablished to the extent feasible and prudent, between business areas and major public transportation routes and between business development and adjacent, non -industrial properties in order to minimize conflicts between land uses. Consistent: Not applicable. This property is located'in an industrial area. No buffer zones are necessary, 6. Accessory Development Accessory development that does not require a shoreline location in order to carry out its support functions shall be sited away fiom the shoreline whenever there is a feasible and prudent inland alternative. this category includes parking, warehousing, open air storage,l, waste storage, treatment or storm runoff control facilities or utilities. Consistent: Yes. This accessory development is located upland/ CASE 87-039 JULY 15, 198.7 P&Z ITEM VI -E 7. Wetlands Filling and drainage of water bodies, floodways, backshores or natural, wetlands shall be consistent with ACMP Standards 6 AAC 80.070 (Energy Facilities) and 6 AAC 80.130 (Habitats). Consistent: Not applicable_. No wetlands or water bodies are present on the site. COMMENTS: The purpose of this request is to permit an eight (8) foot fence to locate within the Shelikof Street right-of-way. In order for the Commission to grant' a variance, all of the following conditions must be satisfied: 1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions,applicable-to the property or intended use of development, which generally do not apply to other properties in the same land use district. The exceptional condition applicable to the intended use of the property is largely a perceptual one. Typically, the average property owner assumes that all the land out to the sidewalk or roadway edge is their "yard," and that they should be able to erect a fence of reasonable height around that yard. In addition, if the fence was built along the property lines, strips of City property would remain outside the fence. It is likely that this property would not then be maintained by the property owner, this could constitute a public health problem. !. 2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result; in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships. Strict application of the zoning ordinance would only allow the fence to be placed on the property lines. Thisis an unnecessary hardship when ,many other fences in the community have encroached on the public property without first receiving a variance. The Commission has also granted variances in the past for fences to project into road'rights-of-way. 3. The granting of the variance will not'result in material damages or prCjudioe to other properties in the vicinity nor -be detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare. Granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public's 'Health, safety or welfare because the fence will not pose a line of sight problem along Shelikof Street either due to its height or .placement Jn the right-of-way. Also, the conditions outlined below ensure that any Lfuture removal of the fence will not impose a cost to the public. The erection of the fence out to the sidewalk will hopefully ensure that the small strip of City property is maintained by the property owner to the benefit of the City. CASE 87-039 4 JULY 15, 1987P&Z IT3M VI -E ,C. 4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objective d of the Comprehensive Plan. Granting of this variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan does not address minor stfuctural developments such as fences. The main use of the property for storage purposes is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions .or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance. i Actions of the applicant have not caused the conditions from which relief is being sought by a variance. The variance request will be decided prior to construction of the fence. 6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the district involved. • Fences are permitted in all land use districts. RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds that this request does meet all the conditions necessary for a variance to be granted under Chapter 17.66 (Variance) of the Borough Code. APPROPRIATE MOTION: ' Should the Commission agree with the staff recommendation, the appropriate motion is: Move to grant a request for a variance from Section 17.54.010(C)1 of the Borough Code to permit an eight (8) foot chain link fence, to project into the Shelikof Street right-of-way out to the sidewalk in a B --Business Zoning District on Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite, subject to the conditions of ' approval outlined in the staff report dated June 26, 1987 and to adopt the findings contained in the staff report as "Findings of Fact" for this case. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The fence is constructed at the applicant's sole expense. 2. The applicant assumes any liability associated with said fence on f City -owned property. 3. If at a future date the City determines that the fence must be removed from the City -owned property, the applicant or any subsequent Owner,of .Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite, agrees to remove same withduE cost to the City. 4. Since the land is publicly owned, no prescriptive right accrues to the ,user. 5. Construction of the fence shall be in such a manner as to not;reI uce any required off-street parking or block the sidewalk. CASE 87-039 87 P&Z ZONING KEY Bt RESIDENTIAL R-i RESIDENTIAL R-2 S RESIDENTIAL R-3 • *: RURAL RESIDENTIAL BUSINESS INDUSTRIAL 0 CONSERVATION c-j PUBLIC USE LANDS AD WATERSHED CASE 87-039 LOT 19A BLK 18 KODIAK TOWN. Ursin Seafoods, Ind. R=325' R NW IND ISLAND N 31 M 41 KODIAK 27A Ursin Seafoods, Inc. Box 492 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Kodiak Island Borough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 July 5, 1988 RE: Case 87-039. Request for a one (1) year extension for a previously approved variance that permitted an eight (8) foot chain link fence to project into the Shelikof Street right-of-way in a B --Business Zoning District. IAlt 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite; 410 Shelikof Street. (Ursin Seafoods, Inc.) To Whom It May Concern: Please be advised that the above -referenced request has been scheduled for review and action by the Planning and Zoning Commission at their July 20, 1988 regular meeting. This meeting will begin at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska. Attendance at this meeting is recommended. The week prior to the regular meeting, on Wednesday, July 13, 1988, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough conference room, the Commission will hold a worksession to 'review the packet material for the regular meeting. You are invited to attend this worksession in order to respond to any questions the Commission may have regarding this request. If you have any questions, please call the Community Development. Department at 486-5736, extension 255. Sincerely, Patricia Miley, Secretary Community Development Department Ursin Seafoods, Inc. Box 492 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Re: Case 87-039. Gentlemen: Kodiak Island Borough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK,ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 April 21, 1988 As you are aware, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted your request for a variance on July 15, 1987. Section 17.66.080 of the Kodiak Island Borough Code specifies that failure to utilize an approved variance within twelve (12) months after its effective date shall cause its cancellation. The purpose of this letter is to remind you that zoning compliance and/or a building permit for your development must be obtained within the twelve (12) month time -limit or your variance will be cancelled. Since nine (9) months have already passed from the dateof approval of your variance, please contact the Community Development Department assoon as possible so that we may assist you in applying for the necessary permits. If you desire further. clarification, please do not hesitate to contact Linda Freed or Gordon Gould at 486-5736. Sincerely, Patricia Miley, Secetary Community. Development Department Ursin Seafoods, Inc. Box 492 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Kodiak Island Borough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 July 16, 1987 RE: CASE 87-039. Request for a variance from Section 17.54.010(C) (Height Extension onto Public Property) of the Borough Code to permit an eight (8) foot chain link fence to project into the Shelikof Street right-of-way in a B --Business- Zoning District. Lot 19A, Blink 18, Kodiak Townsite; 410 Shelikof-Street. (Ursin Seafoods,. Inc.) Gentlemen: The Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting on July 15, 1987, granted your request for the variance cited above subject to the following conditions of approval: 1. The fence is constructed at the applicant's sole expense. 2. Theapplicant assumes any liability associated with said fence on city -owned property. 3. If at a future date the City determines that the fence must be removed from the City -owned property, the applicant or any subsequent owner of Lot 19A, .Block 18, Kodiak Townsite, agrees to remove same without cost to the City. 4. Since the land is publicly Owned, no prescriptive right accrues to.the user. 5. Construction of the fence shall be in such a manner as to not reduce any required off-street parking or block the sidewalk. The Commission also adopted the following findings of fact in, support of their decision: 1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or intended use. of development, which generally do not apply to other properties in the-saMe land use district. The exceptional condition applicableto•the intended use of the property i9. largely a perceptual one. Typically, the average property owner assumes that all the land out to the sidewalk or roadway edge is their "yard," and that they should be able to erect a fence of reasonable height around that yard. In addition, if the fence was built along the property lines, strips of City Kodiak Island Borough Ursin Seafoods, Inc. July 16, 1987 Page Two property would remain outside the fence. It is likely that this property would not then be maintained by the property owner, this could constitute a public, health problem. 2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships. Strict application of the zoning ordinance would only allow the fence to be placed on the property lines. This is an unnecessary hardship, when many other fences in the community have encroached on the public property without first receiving a variance. The Commission has also granted variances in the past for fences to project into road rights -of -way. - 3. .The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare. Granting of the variance will notbe detrimental to the public's health, safety or welfare because the fence will not pose a line of sight problem along Shelikof Street either due to its height or placement in the right-of-way. Also, the conditions outlined below ensure that any future removal of the fence will not impose a cost to the public. The erection of the fence out to the sidewalk will hopefully ensure that the small strip of City property is maintained by the property owner to the benefit of the City. 4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to -the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Granting of this variance will notbe contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan does not address minor -structural developments such as fences. The main use of the property for storage -purposes is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance. Actions of the applicant have not caused the conditions from which relief is being sought by a variance. The variance request .will be decided prior to construction of the fence. 6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the district involved. -. Fences are permitted in all land use districts. Kodiak Island Borough Ursin Seafoods, Inc. July 16,.1987 Page Three THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT ALLOW ANY CONSTRUCTION TO BEGIN. You must first obtain zoning compliance and/or a building permit. Please contact this office for further details. An appeal of this decision may be initiated by any person or party aggrieved by filing a written notice of appeal with the City Clerk within ten days of the date of the Commission's decision. The notice of appeal must state the specific _grounds for the appeal. Therefore, the Commission's decision will not be final and effective until ten days following the decision. Failure to utilize this variance within 12 months after its effective date shall cause its cancellation. Please bring this letter with you when you come to our office to obtain zoning.compliance for any construction on your lot. If you have any questions about the action of the Commission, please contact me. Robert H. Pederson, Associate Planner Community Development Department cc: Case File 5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance. In this case, actions of the applicant have not caused the conditions from which relief is being sought by a variance. The existing building was constructed in compliance with the Urban Renewal Plan, which precluded provision of off-street parking. Further, the variance will be decided prior to conversion of the kitchen area. 6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the district involved. An eating and drinking establishment is a permitted land use in the B --Business Zoning District. CASE 87-039.• Request for a variance from Section 17.54.010(C) (Height--- "Extension onto Public Property) of the Borough Code to permit an eight (8) foot chain link fence to project into the Shelikof Street right-of-way in a B --Business Zoning District. Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite; 410 Shelikof Street. (Ursin Seafoods, Inc.) BOB PEDERSON indicated 31 public hearing notices were mailed for this case and none were returned. Three telephone calls were received indicating support for the approval .of this request. Staff recommended approval of this request. Regular Session Closed. Public Hearing Opened: Seeing and hearing none. Public Hearing Closed. Regular Session Opened. COMMISSIONER ANDERSON MOVED TO GRANT a request for a variance from Section 17.54.010(C) of the Borough Coda to permit an eight (8) foot chain link fence to project into the Shelikof Street right-of-way out to the sidewalk in a B --Business Zoning District on Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite, subject to the conditions of approval outlined in the staff report dated June 26, 1987 and to adopt the findings contained in the staff report as "Findings.of Fact" for this case. The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll call vote. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The fence is constructed at the applicant's sole expense. 2. The applicant assumes any liability associated with said fence on City -owned property. 3. If at a future date the City determines that the fence must be removed from the City -owned property, the applicant or any subsequent owner of Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite, agrees to remove same without cost to the City. 4. Since the land is publicly owned, no 'prescriptive right accrues to the user. 5. Construction of the fence shall be in such a manner as to not reduce any required off-street parking or block the sidewalk. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or intended use of development, which generally Planning & Zoning Commission 11 July 15, 1987 Minutes do not apply to other properties in the same land use district. The exceptional condition applicable to the intended use of the property is largely a perceptual one. Typically, the average property owner assumes that all the land out to the sidewalk or roadway edge is their "yard," and that they should be able to erect a fence 'of reasonable height around that yard. In addition, if the fence was built along the property lines, strips of City property would remain outside the fence. It is likely that this property would not then be maintained by the property owner, this could constitute a public health problem. 2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships. Strict application of the zoning ordinance would only allow the fence to be placed on the property lines. This is an unnecessary hardship when many other fences in the community have encroached on the public property without first receiving a variance. The Commission has also granted variances in the past for fences to project into road rights-of-way. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare. Granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public's health, safety or welfare because the fence will not pose a line of sight problem along Shelikof Street either due to its height or placement in the right-of-way. Also, the conditions outlined below ensure that any future removal of the fence will not impose a cost to the public. The erection of the fence out to the sidewalk will hopefully ensure that. the small strip of City property is maintained by the property owner to the benefit of the City. 4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Granting of this variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan does not address minor structural developments such as fences. The main use of the property for storage purposes is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance. Actions of the applicant have not caused the conditions from which relief is being sought by a variance. The variance request will be decided prior to construction of the fence. 6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the district involved. Fences are permitted in all land use districts. F) CASE 87-040. Request for a variance from Section 17.19.040 (Yards) of the Borough Code to permit a sixteen by sixteen (16 x 16) foot garage addition onto the rear of the existing single-family residence to encroach six (6) feet into the required ten (10) foot rear yard setback in a R2—Two-Family Residential Zoning District. Lot 6, Block 35, East Addition; 1113 Mission Road. (Vern and Debra Hall) COMMISSIONER HEINRICHS requested to be excused due to a possible conflict of interest. COMMISSIONER RENNELL excused COMMISSIONER HEINRICHS. Planning S Zoning Commission 12 July 15, 1987 Minutes Ursin Seafoods, Inc. Box 492 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Kodiak Island Borough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 July 9, 1987 CASE 87-039. Request for a variance from Section 17.54.010(C) (Height - Extension onto Public Property) of the Borough Code to permit an eight (8) foot chain link fence to project into the Shelikof Street right-of-way in a B --Business Zoning District. Lot 19A, Block 18, .Kodiak Townsite; 410 Shelikof Street. (Ursin Seafoods, Inc.) Gentlemen: Enclosed please find a copy of the materials, concerning the above -referenced item, reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission at their regularly scheduled packet review session held Wednesday, July 8, 1987. If you have any questions or comments, please contact the Community Development Department at 486-5736, extension 255. SinCerely, Patricia Miley, LSecretary Community Development Department .enclosures Kodiak Island Borough MEMORANDUM DATE: June 26, 1987 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Community Development Department SUBJECT: Information for the July 15, 1987 Regular Meeting RE: ITEM VI -E CASE 87-039. Request for a variance from Section 17.54.010(C) (Height - Extension onto Public Property) of the Borough Code to permit an eight (8) foot chain link fence to project into the Shelikof Street right-of-way in a B --Business Zoning District. Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite; 410 Shelikof Street. (Ursin Seafoods, Inc.) Thirty-one (31) public hearing notices were mailed on June 30, 1987. Date of site visit: June 23, 1987. 1. Applicant: Ursin Seafoods, Inc. 2. Land Owner: Same. 3. Request: For a variance from Section 17.54.010(C) (Height - Extension onto Public Property) of the Borough Code to permit an eight (8) foot chain link fence to project into the Shelikof Street right-of-way in a B --Business Zoning District. 4. Purpose: To permit an eight (8) foot chain link fence to locate within the Shelikof Street right-of-way. 5. Existing Zoning: B --Business 6. Zoning History: The 1968 Comprehensive Plan identifies this area as Business. Departmental files indicate no further activity. 7. Location: Physical: 410 Shelikof Street Legal: Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite 8. Lot Size: 15,550 square feet 9. Existing Land Use: Outdoor storage. CASE 87-039 1 JULY 15, 1987 P&Z ITEM VI -E 10. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North: Across Rezanof - Lot 39A, Block 19, Kodiak Townsite Use: Duplex Zoning: R2--Two-Family Residential South: City Tidelands Tract N-22 Use: Industrial Zoning: I --Industrial East: Lot 22, Block 3, New Kodiak Use: Commercial Zoning: B --Business West: Lot 20B, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite Use: Commercial (Anchor Bar) Zoning: B --Business 11. Comprehensive Plan: The 1968 Comprehensive Plan depicts this area for Heavy Industrial Development. 12. Applicable Regulations: The following sections of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Borough Code are applicable to this request: 17.54.010 Height --Extension onto public property. Fences and walls not exceeding six feet in height may occupy any portion of a side or rear yard in any R district, provided that where such fence or wall projects beyond the front yard line or setback line toward the front property line, the following further restrictions shall apply: C. No fence, wall or hedge shall be erected or maintained on the public property beyond the front property line of any lot or parcel of land, except masonry or concrete retaining walls, and then only to a height not to exceed six inches above the grade of the earth such wall is constructed to retain. A permit shall first be secured from the building official approving the necessity for and type of such retaining wall. COASTAL MANAGEMENT APPLICABLE POLICIES Business Development 1. Natural Features Dredge and fill, excavation, shoreline alteration and disturbance of anadromous streams, tideflats and wetlands shall be minimized when constructing and operating port, harbor, dock, industrial and energy facilities - if permitted under applicable regulations. Consistent: Not applicable. This action does not include the above referenced facilities. CASE 87-039 2 JULY 15, 1987 P&Z ITEM VI -E 2. Natural Setting, Views and Access Development shall be conducted in a manner that mitigates adverse impacts upon the Kodiak Archipelago; developers shall provide opportunities for public access to the shoreline and scenic views, to the extent feasible and prudent. Consistent: Not applicable. The property is not located along the shoreline or in a scenic area. 3. Dredge and Excavation Material Dredging and filling shall be consistent with ACMP Standards 6 AAC 80.040 (Coastal Development) and 6 AAC 80.110 (Mineral and Mining Processing). Dredge spoil may be utilized in shoreside landfills if permitted under applicable regulations for the purpose of creating usable waterfront land. Consistent: Not applicable. This action does not involve dredging or filling activities. 4. Facility Design Developments in or over the water, such as piers, docks and protective structures shall be located, designed and maintained in a manner that prevents adverse impacts upon water quality, fish, wildlife and vegetative resources and minimizes interruption of water circulation patterns, coastal processes and navigation. Consistent: Not applicable. This action does not involve development in or over the water. 5. Buffer Zones Buffer zones shall be established to the extent feasible and prudent, between business areas and major public transportation routes and between business development and adjacent, non -industrial properties in order to minimize conflicts between land uses. Consistent: Not applicable. This property is located in an industrial area. No buffer zones are necessary. 6. Accessory Development Accessory development that does not require a shoreline location in order to carry out its support functions shall be sited away from the shoreline whenever there is a feasible and prudent inland alternative. this category includes parking, warehousing, open air storage, waste storage, treatment or storm runoff control facilities or utilities. Consistent: Yes. This accessory development is located upland. CASE 87-039 3 JULY 15, 1987 P&Z ITEM VI -E 7. Wetlands Filling and drainage of water bodies, floodways, backshores or natural wetlands shall be consistent with ACMP Standards 6 AAC 80.070 (Energy Facilities) and 6 AAC 80.130 (Habitats). Consistent: Not applicable. No wetlands or water bodies are present on the site. COMMENTS: The purpose of this request is to permit an eight (8) foot fence to locate within the Shelikof Street right-of-way. In order for the Commission to grant a variance, all of the following conditions must be satisfied: 1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or intended use of development, which generally do not apply to other properties in the same land use district. The exceptional condition applicable to the intended use of the property is largely a perceptual one. Typically, the average property owner assumes that all the land out to the sidewalk or roadway edge is their "yard," and that they should be able to erect a fence of reasonable height around that yard. In addition, if the fence was built along the property lines, strips of City property would remain outside the fence. It is likely that this property would not then be maintained by the property owner, this could constitute a public health problem. 2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships. Strict application of the zoning ordinance would only allow the fence to be placed on the property lines. This is an unnecessary hardship when many other fences in the community have encroached on the public property without first receiving a variance. The Commission has also granted variances in the past for fences to project into road rights-of-way. 3. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare. Granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public's health, safety or welfare because the fence will not pose a line of sight problem along Shelikof Street either due to its height or placement in the right-of-way. Also, the conditions outlined below ensure that any future removal of the fence will not impose a cost to the public. The erection of the fence out to the sidewalk will hopefully ensure that the small strip of City property is maintained by the property owner to the benefit of the City. CASE 87-039 4 JULY 15, 1987 P&Z ITEM VI -E 4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Granting of this variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan does not address minor structural developments such as fences. The main use of the property for storage purposes is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance. Actions of the applicant have not caused the conditions from which relief is being sought by a variance. The variance request will be decided prior to construction of the fence. 6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the district involved. Fences are permitted in all land use districts. RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds that this request does meet all the conditions necessary for a variance to be granted under Chapter 17.66 (Variance) of the Borough Code. APPROPRIATE MOTION: Should the Commission agree with the staff recommendation, the appropriate motion is: Move to grant a request for a variance from Section 17.54.010(C) of the Borough Code to permit an eight (8) foot chain link fence to project into the Shelikof Street right-of-way out to the sidewalk in a B --Business Zoning District on Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite, subject to the conditions of approval outlined in the staff report dated June 26, 1987 and to adopt the findings contained in the staff report as "Findings of Fact" for this case. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The fence is constructed at the applicant's sole expense. 2. The applicant assumes any liability associated with said fence on City -owned property. 3. If at a future date the City determines that the fence must be removed from the City -owned property, the applicant or any subsequent owner of Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite, agrees to remove same without cost to the City. 4. Since the land is publicly owned, no prescriptive right accrues to the user. 5. Construction of the fence shall be in such a manner as to not reduce any required off-street parking or block the sidewalk. CASE 87-039 5 JULY 15, 1987 P&Z ZONING KEY RESIDENTIAL R -I RESIDENTIAL R-2 RESIDENTIAL R-3 RURAL RESIDENTIAL BUSINESS INDUSTRIAL CONSERVATION PUBLIC USE LANDS WATERSHED • CASE 87-039 LOT 19A BLK 18 KODIAK TOWN. Ursin Seafoods, _Inc. R=325' US SURVEY 4 7 G RBD JND ISLAND USS 183?''' N 31 N 41 NEW KODIAK June 12, 1987 Ursin Seafoods P.O. Box 492 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Gentlemen: In reference to your request to construct an 8 -foot fence adjacent to the sidewalk at Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite, please be advised that the City of -Kodiak- has no objection provided. that it does not .interfere with the operation and maintenance of the sewage lift station in the area..- It should also be noted that should the.City require the right-of-way in the future, the fence will have to be removed by you at no cost to the City. Please take this letter to the Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Department for zoning approval be- fore constructing the fence. Very truly yours, CITY OF KODIAK Herman T. Beukers Director of Public Works HTB/ak PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. P.O. BO,)S 1397. KODIAK. ALASKA 99615 PHONE (907) 486-5731 Kodiak Island Borough P.O. BOX 1246 KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-1246 c--: ISLHILLI; HY, '...&-•;'-:J!..fIL:ft 1 a BOX '^.249 t 100 I:A k 99615AK Ursin Seafoods, Inc, Box 492 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Kodiak Island Borough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 June 30, 1987 RE: CASE 87-039. Request for a variance from' Section 17.54.010(C) (Height - Extension onto Public Property) of the Borough Code t� permit an eight (8) foot chain link fence to project into the Shelikof Street right-of-way in a B --Business Zoning District. Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite; 410 Shelikof Street. (Ursin Seafoods, Inc.) Gentlemen: Please be advised that the above -referenced request has been scheduled for review and action by the Planning and Zoning Commission at their July 15, 1987 regular meeting. This meeting will begin at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska. Your attendance at this meeting is recommended. The week prior to the regular meeting, on Wednesday, July 8, 1987, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough conference room, the Commission will hold a worksession to review the packet material for the regular meeting. You are invited to attend this worksession in order to respond to any questions the Commission may have regarding this request. If you have any questions, please call the Community Development Department at 486-5736, extension 255. Sincerely, Patricia Miley, S cretary Community Development Department KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 99615 ITEM VI -E. PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE. A public hearing will be held on Wednesday, July 15, 1987. The meeting will begin ,at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska, before the Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission, to hear comments, if any', on the following request: CASE 87-039. Request for a variance from Section 17.54.010(C) (Height - Extension onto Public Property) of the Borough Code to permit an eight (8) foot chain link.fence to project into the Shelikof Street right-of-way in a B --Business Zoning District. Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite; 410 Shelikof Street. (Ursin Seafoods, Inc.) If you do not wish to testify verbally, you, may provide your comments in the space below, or in a letter to the Community Development Department prior to the meeting. You are being notified because you are a property owner in the area of the request. If you have any questions about the request, please call us at 486-5736, extension 255. Your name: Mailing Address: Your property description: Comments: ZONING KEY RESIDENTIAL R:11 RESIDENTIAL R-2 RESIDENTIAL R-3 RURAL RESIDENTIAL BUSINESS INDUSTRIAL 0 CONSERVATION PUBLIC USE LANDS 0 WATERSHED KODIAK TOWNS •- A . • • . ••••• 14 a .• , CASE 87-039 LOT 19A BLK 18 KODIAK TOWN. Ursin Seafoods, Inc. R=325' US SURVEY Tr G WEST a 9 U SS 163.37 ei 0 11 UND ISLAND SMALL BOAT HA 14 31 KON4D1 NEW AK 6 R1340180190 w s URS 1 N -9—N O R MAN—S—R . 5 P.O. BOX 492 •• , . . s KODI AK . '. AK 99615 , 1 o .1 2 ' R1340180201 , 31(111 NEAR—C—REED 9 INC 4 P • O• BOX 1272 5 KODI AK AK 99615 7 -5 ' , • • 5,.. 9 0 R1340180204 2 ASEN A, T1 M—C---P-AKErA ,3 P.O. BOX 2287. KODIAK - AK 99615 '5 '6 '7 , 9 ; • R1340180200 lo „ ALAS . 'TE OF AK 99510 3 17 18 19 R1340182067 10 A 1..—_—AS K . 9 TATF , DIVISI NI OF IGHWAYS , ANCHORAGE : AK 99510 . 43 44 15 16 17 R1340.190010 - 9—StJTLIF,MARGARET ;() P.0. BOX 3669 „ KODIAK AK 99615 52 i4 031P -"2- 55 56 57 R1340190260 . „ BURe-H9OR AL ----&—C HER -1—E , P 0. BOX 2203 , KODIAK AK 99615 , , • R1340190300 ;---F-E-R-Raz-zi .TOSEPT-1—t—JANE 2 P.O. BOX 3696 KODIAK AK 99615 5 6 7 8 9 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 -ZHICROFF-Tr FRED P.O. BOX 405 KODIAK R1340190310 AK 99615 R1340190330 li-I-LLITI MOTH Y—EJULtE P.O. BOX 2249 KODIAK AK 99615 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 R1340190341 D-AMON/H-1—YONG P.O. BOX 1784 KODIAK AK •99615 R1340190342 -Mee-ONN-E L DU A Y —W P.O. BOX 2011 PALMER AK 99645 R1340190351 P.O. BOX 4301 KODIAK AK 99615 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 R1340190352 -1E-NS-EINITS TEVE—&--J E R P.O. BOX 3970 KODIAK AK 99615 R1340190360 1t • 0 0 0 0 Wii`.it7Jl%LA1V A P.D. BOX 3261 6KODIAK 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 3 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 AK 99' 5 P.D. BOX 1504 KODIAK AK 99615 -R1340190361 BISHOP,WILL1AM 1:iERE_SA 302 MARINE WAY KODIAK AK 99615 R1340190371 TRREINE NTC W JR 411 HILLCREST KODIAK AK 99615 R1340190372 PUUGHTJOHN P.D. BOX 685 KODIAK AK 99615 R1340190382 WALTERS-i-THOM-AS-fJ P.O. BOX 500 KODIAK AK 99615 R1340190390 -H NE S ET TH-EN-RY-&-E MK E P.D. BOX 456 KODIAK AK 99615 R1340190401 P1CLMfRE.,KIP-W --R-I-CK1 L 80X 1558 KODIAK AK 99615 R1340190402 Y. ARTLL _ & r. wtl l a TfT ... P.D. BOX 1504 KODIAK AK 99615 6 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 ' 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 R1340190410 -77 P.O. BOX 70f KODI AK R134019042.0 517 LOWER MILL BAY ROAD" KODIAK AK 99615 R1340190430 P.O BOX 101;020 ANCHORAGE . -HY. P.O. i 2287 • KO DI 1:220030160 ... . ....... ... AK 99615 R1220030170 -BMi-10s S -h NO E*4 .... -i ANDREW,JOY/HALTER,LOREN P.O. BOX. 1700 11011 -MAX AK 99 61 P.O. Box -361 KODIAK AK 99615 -S L LAND -1P 9715 NE > JUANITA KIRKLAND R122003.0200 048) 98034 6 2 2 2 R11C )0100 INIUL SLATIKM.5—UF-ALAS RA P.D. BOX 2997 , KODI AK AK 99615 2-TJR-STN P.O. 2 KOD A R1100000110 OR'N OX 492 AK 99615 3 4 5 6 7 8 , URS -1 N, 8 P.O. KODIAK . R1100000120 , 0 ° AN ;DX '92 AK 99615 ...." 2 4 5 6 R1100000130 8 MA JOIC s Jii L WS—a EtARB-AR A 13 . , P.O. BOX 345 0 KODIAK - AK 99615 2 3 6 2 -UR -ST% 8 P. De 9 KODI A .R1100000140 ORM . DX AK 99615 o 2 . 3 4 05 61- A -RM AN ,2 2235 8 SEATTLE- R1100000150 -C-0 NS T ktiel. I -ON -CO WEST HALLADAY - - ' WA 98199 0 01 02 03 i4 R1100000166 55 LARMAN CON 1111 I1JN,CO 56 2235 WEST A .DAY/ 57 SEATTLE A 98199 58 . 59 , . SO -K001-AK-?-0 I TY Oi- P.O. 60X 1397 6 R1100010000 00000 ( 2 3 ba10 — Ig 4- 3 0a `0 0 0 1V614.) leo0„ r( - z oo3 1 I/ U ©00 o/-oD /10 000 00 0/(.0 0000 / ZONING KEY RESIDENTIAL R-1 0 RESIDENTIAL R-2 p RESIDENTIAL R-3 •:•: RURAL RESIDENTIAL BUSINESS. INDUSTRIAL 0 CONSERVATION p PUBLIC USE LANDS 0 WATERSHED CASE 87-039 LOT 19A BLK 18 KODIAK TOWN. Ursin Seafoods, Inc. R=325' KODIAK TOWNS US SURVEY Tr G N 31 1441 NEW KODIAK - • - • NUULAK 6ORCUGH POST OFFICE BOX 1246 KODIAK', ALASKA 99615 ( ) Conditional Use Permit ( ) Exception (N4 Variance ( ) Zoning Change: From: CODE SECTION INVOLVED: (-7---54 NOTE: The application fee for all items covered by this form is $50. Conditional Use Permits, Exceptions, and Variance Applications also require the submission of a site plan. APPLICANT: PROPERTY: .1.1)ei&) :JEFCTZS •NameHome Telephone ft)0V- /f9; 4g,--5174 Address 1421-)kArvLk(Z-, City, State, Zip Lot Block S-3/ -TS Work Telephone Subdivision Name United States Survey # Section, Township, Range, S.M. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY: ear, PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY: 61)tsjzT &of OE I have been advised of the procedures iolvec with this request and have received a copy of the appropriate reguaticns. Qnc. -/-1J6Prilan L. Auttoripd Acnt Da:, . Data Application Acceptee: 6 -7 3Y: Property Owner Date RECEIVED FROM • CASH RECEIPT Kodiak Island Borough 710 UPPER MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486.15736 ..SI f e-�-- 00.A.S I•lC DATE 10786 6-1/ 1982 THE BOROUGH ARE SATISFIED ONLY UPON THE CHECK BEING HONORED. RETURNED CHECKS FOR ANY REASON RESTORES THE OBLIGATION AS UNPAID AND SUBJECTS THE PAYER TO ANY CHARGES, FEES OR OTHER LEGAL LIABILITIES AS MAY BE APPLICABLE, CASHIER Os PAYOR PAYMENT MADE BY: CHECK NO. � `` CASH 1 1 OTHER FM08-511 B 15 -000- lol - 10-oo CASH .T04.4.: i ...,,..`,�` ',-tli ! 'y 010 - 000 - 105 - 01 - 00 PROPERTY TAX; REAL 9,, Mw xr {d F;;. r't� r i I 010 - 000 - 105 - 06 - 00 PROPERTY TAX, PERSONAL'.1''nl Ta•y a►•C R "' F� 010 - 000 - 111 - 61 - 00. PROPERTY TAX, LIENS �r A. �3Nt1x011:v I 1 010 - 000 = 107 - - 00 PERSONAL TAX, LIENS 1 1 040 - 000 - 371 - 11 - 00 LAND SALE, PRINCIPAL 1�1� :;•"...‘1..-416'. I 040 -000 - 371 - 12 - 00 LAND SALE, INTEREST !};! f r` I I 051 - 000 - 115 - 00 - 00 WATER SEWER Qt,A1 �l 1! {{,,KA�T+ +3�.'.: X1.4. � h: I 052 - 000 - 115 - 00 - 00 010 - 000 - 319 - 10.- 00 PENALTIES, INTEREST y • • • t5' '� I PER ATTACHED iv:•a•Kfr.• r ''fti)•"� '' 0,)..... ` VC&, r I (A, >n, c� -. ,•iXv ... 1x .. •a 1l': 1 I CONDITIONS OF CHECK PAYMENTS— PAYMENTS TENDERED BY CHECK FOR OBLIGATIONS DUE TO TOTAL 1 1 1 St 1t THE BOROUGH ARE SATISFIED ONLY UPON THE CHECK BEING HONORED. RETURNED CHECKS FOR ANY REASON RESTORES THE OBLIGATION AS UNPAID AND SUBJECTS THE PAYER TO ANY CHARGES, FEES OR OTHER LEGAL LIABILITIES AS MAY BE APPLICABLE, CASHIER Os PAYOR PAYMENT MADE BY: CHECK NO. � `` CASH 1 1 OTHER FM08-511 B 15 BUILDING DEPARTMENT— CITY / BOROUGH OF KODIAK APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT AND CERTIFICATE Applicant to fill in between heavy lines. OF OCCUPANCY BUILDING ADDRESS )L)4,,k,icia. CLASS OF WORK NEW DEMOLISH LOCALITY' ALTERATION REPAIR NEAREST CROSS ST-) r if r ADDITION MOVE BUILDING PERMIT NO. DATE ISSUED USE OF BUILDING W Z 0 NAME V. 'CI' r-. f—PkdSIL'�•^CC- SIZE OF BUILDING HEIGHT MAIL ADDRESS NO. OF ROOMS NO. OF FLOORS CITY Itt zt1 A IL 1._ -;01 NO. OF BUILDINGS VALUATION BLDG. FEE $1 PLAN CHK. FEE TOTAL c NAME NO. OF BUILDINGS NOW ON LOT BUILDING PLUMBING ELECTRIC NO. OF FAMILIES FOUNDATION. ROUGH ROUGH ADDRESS SIZE OF LOT n I. FRAME SEPTIC TANK FINISH CITY USE OF BLDG. NOW ON LOT i�:�J,..'r /s,1r PLASTER SEWER FIXTURES SPECIFICATIONS FLUES GAS MOTORS STATE LICENSE NO. FOUNDATION• FINAL FINISH FINAL 0 F U' z 0 U NAMELJY h C 1i//1 "d5?i4.--v MATERIAL EXTERIOR, PIERS WIDTH OF TOP ADDRESS WIDTH OF BOTTOM CITY DEPTH IN GROUND R.W. PLATE (SILL) STATE LICENSE NO.`) g. t SIZE SPA:, SPAN DESCRIPTION SUBDI VJI S/ION { j . GIRDERS JOIST 1st. FL. JOIST 2nd. FL. LOT NO. � BLK. /!?) JOIST CEILING EXTERIOR STUDS DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE (1. Type of Construction I, II, I11, IV; V(VI, 2. Occupancy Group.A, B, E, H, 1, M,R Div. I, 2, 3,-4- 3. Fire Zone 1 2 3=4 INTERIOR STUDS ROOF RAFTERS BEARING WALLS COVERING EXTERIOR WALLS ROOF INTERIOR WALLS REROOFING FLUES FIREPLACE FL. FURNACE KITCHEN WATER HEATER FURNACE GAS OIL I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application ands state that the above is correct and` agree to' comply with all City Ordinances and tateS Laws regulating building construction. (r Applicant / \:._u� rs A (� - 1 • t _. --� r ( „awl-v-c� „ ', cz c Frl 16114 / f . rY (/ 41/ • 3NI1 A11=13dOtld PLOT PLAN 0 V —I r_ Z m SETBACK STREET f t v ///�(f/ _ 11/7 A 1+ f Approved: CHIEF BUILDING OFFICAL ; Y r PLANNING & ZONING INFO. ZONING DISTRICT TYPE OF OCCUPANCY NUMBER OF STORIES v ) TOTAL HT. AREA OF LOT 1 \ 1 FRONT YARD SETBACK FYIC;M PROP. LINE....." -4 SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM eRO. LINA )t'i'ff REAR YARD t A/ Approved:,ZONIN ADMINISTRAT R By: �_"`, BUTh(1:- )ING DEPARTMENT— CITY / BOROUGH OF KODIAK Applicant to fill in between heavy lines. APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT AND CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY BUILDING ADDRESS /O7 ,64,4"14( ^:014 - LOCALITY A„, c a CLASS OF WORK 7NEW DEMOLISH ALTERATION REPA I R NEAREST CROSS ST. J`, G/ cAsir cJf uJ z 0 NAME—ad-4, Moo 2 E.. MAI L,tDe7ss 0111 0 N MOVE BUILDING PERMIT NO. 1/ 117 DATE ISSUED 11/7 USE OF BUILDING SIZE OF BUILDING 2Afr v c -:„,- HEIGHT NO. OF ROOMS NO. OF FLOORS 2- CITY,1-7VTEL. NO. ../41CJIWCA NO. OF BUILDINGS VALUATION 5 BLDG. FEE PLAN CHK. FEE TOTAL U - Or LIJ LO - Z Z z 111 NAME NO. OF BUILDINGS NOW ON LOT / BUILDING PLUMBING ELECTRIC NO. OF FAMILIES 7 -- FOUNDATION ROUGH ROUGH ADDRESS SIZE OF LOT /(9. ar$" 'r FRAME SEPTIC TANK FINISH CITY USE OF BLDG. NOW ON LOT P- z - PLASTER SEWER FIXTURES SPECIFICATIONS FLUES GAS MOTORS STATE LICENSE NO. FOUNDATION FINAL FINISH FINAL Cr 1- ct et NAME 0, AIL/ MATERIAL WIDTH OF TOP EXTERIOR' PIERS (X/5.17 AiC ADDRE,S0 WIDTH OF BOTTOM It CITY z Ko DEPTH IN GROUND 5. R.W. PLATE (SILL) STATE LICENSE /(4•4 d /--c, Q• SIZE SPAN I SUBDIVISION LOT NO. /e BLK 1/1" GIRDERS JOIST (4.7 JOIST 1st. FL. JOIST 2nd, FL. JOIST CEILING C ,VS ef .0 rt/ Ls. EXTERIOR STUDS DO NOT R TE BELOW THIS LINE _,Type of Construction I,ii,ti1v,vt 2. Occupancy Group A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H4.Div. 1, 2, 3, 4, 3. Fire Zone 1 INTERIOR STUDS ROOF RAFTERS A., A e•••••• /3 BEARING WALLS COVERING EXTERIOR WALLS ROOF 3 7;4.6 INTERIOR WALLS REROOFING FLUES FIREPLACE FL. FURNACE KITCHEN WATER HEATER FURNACE GAS OIL f LA- et, /2+ C / A -1,C 41-• JL /-(u.it.-e-a" ,Sr I hereby acknowVdge that 1 have read this application and state that the above is correct and agree to comply - with all Cify7 Ordinances and State Laws regulailin /building construction. Applic_ant In accordance with Section 305(b) UBC 1979, it is mandatory that the owner request the above inspections prior to proceeding with any additional work. KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, 486-5736. Approved: CHIEF BUILDING OFFICAL PLANNING & ZONING I 0. ZONING DISTRICTier-ILi € 443,6o• /es TYPE OF OCCUPANCY1944) -ret /t(e NUMBER OF STORIES NOTAL HT. AREA OF LOT /2 FRONT YARD SETBACK FI(OM PROP. LINE SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM PROP. LINE ea? e REAR YARD Approved: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 41://417/17 _G7