Loading...
KODIAK TWNST BK 18 LT 19A-1A - VarianceUrsin Seafoods, Inc. Box 492 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 L Kodiak Island Borough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 July 31, 1989 Re: Case 87-039. Request for a one (1) year extension for a previously approved variance that permitted an eight (8) foot chain link fence to project into the Shelikof Street right-of-way in a B --Business Zoning District. Lot 19A, Block 18, KodiakTownsite, 410 Shelikof Street. TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: The Planning and Zoning Commission granted the request for a one (1) year extension for the variance cited above on July 20, 1988. Section 17.66.080 of the Kodiak Island Borough Code specifies that failure to utilize an approved variance within twelve (12) months after its effective date shall cause its cancellation. Since more than twelve (12) months have elapsed since the above-cited variance was approved and because zoning compliance and/or a building permit have not been issued for the proposed development, the variance is no longer effective. If you still desire to pursue your proposed development, it is necessary for you to apply for another variance from the Planning and Zoning Commission. This means that a new public hearing will be held on the request and that an additional fee is required. It you desire further clarification of this matter, please do not hesitate to contact the Community Development Department. Sincerely, Patricia Miley, Secreta Community Development Department Ursin Seafoods, Inc. Box 492 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Kodiak Island Borough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 April 19, 1989 Re: Case 87-039. Request for a one (1) year extension for a previously approved variance that permitted an eight (8) foot chainlink fence to project Into the Shelikof Street right-of-way In a B -- Business Zoning District. Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite, 410 Shelikof Street. TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: The Planning and Zoning Commission granted the one (1) year extension for a previously approved variance request cited above on July 20, 1988. Section 17.66.080 of the Kodiak Island Borough Code specifies that failure to utilize an approved variance within twelve (12) months after its effective date shall cause its cancellation. The variance cited above will expire on July 20, 1989. If zoning compliance and/or a building permit for the development has not been Issued on or before the expiration date, the variance will be cancelled. Since the expiration date is quickly approaching, please contact the Community Development Department as soon as possible so that we may assist you In applying for the necessary permits. If you desire further clarification, please contact the Community Development Department. Sincerely, Patricia Miley, Secretary Community Development Department Ursin Seafoods, Inc. Box 492 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Kodiak Island Borough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486.5736 July 21, 1988 RE: Case 87-039. Request for a one (1) year extension for a previously approved variance that permitted an eight (8) foot chain link fence to project into the Shelikof Street right-of-way in a B --Business Zoning District. Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite; 410 Shelikof Street. (Ursin Seafoods, Inc.) To Whom It May Concern: The Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting on July 20, 1988, approved the request for the review and approval cited above subject to the following conditions of approval: 1. The fence is constructed at the applicant's sole expense. 2. The applicant assumes any liability associated with said fence on city -owned property. 3. If at a future date the City determines that the fence must be removed from the City -owned property, the applicant or any subsequent owner of Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite, agrees to remove same without cost to the City. 4. Since the land is publicly owned, no prescriptive right accrues to the user. 5. Construction of the fence shall be in such a manner as to not reduce any required off-street parking or block the sidewalk. The Commission also reaffirmed the following findings of fact in support of their decision: 1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or intended use of development. which generally do not apply to other properties in the same land use district, The exceptional condition applicable to the intended use of the property is largely a perceptual one. Typically, the Kodiak Island Borough Ursin Seafoods, Inc. July 21, 1988 Page Two average property owner assumes that all the land out to the sidewalk or roadway edge is their "yard," and that they should be able to erect a fence of reasonable height around that yard. In addition, if the fence was built along the property lines, strips of City property would remain outside the fence. It is likely. that this property would not then be maintained by the property owner, this could constitute a public health problem. 2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships. Strict application of the zoning ordinance would only allow the fence to be placed on the property lines. This is an unnecessary hardship when many other fences in the community have encroached on the public property without first receiving a variance. The Commission has also granted variances in the past for fences to project into road rights-of-way. 3. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare. Granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public's health, safety or welfare because the fence will not pose a line of sight problem along Shelikof Street either due to its height or placement in the right-of-way. Also, the conditions outlined below ensure that any future removal of the fence will not impose a cost to the public. The erection of the fence out to the sidewalk will hopefully ensure that the small strip of City property is maintained by the property owner to the benefit of the City. 4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Granting of this variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan does not address minor structural developments such as fences. The main use of the property for storage purposes is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Kodiak Island Borough Ursin Seafoods, Inc. July 21, 1988 Page Three 5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance. Actions of the applicant have not caused the conditions from which relief is being sought by a variance. The variance request will be decided prior to construction of the fence. 6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the district involved. Fences are permitted in all land use districts. An appeal of this decision may be initiated by any person or party aggrieved by filing a written notice of appeal with the City Clerk within ten days of the date of the Commission's decision. The notice of appeal must state the specific grounds for the appeal. Therefore, the Commission's decision will not be final and effective until ten days following the decision. Failure to utilize this approval within 12 months after its effective date shall cause its cancellation. Please bring this letter with you if you need to come into our office to obtain zoning compliance for any construction on the property. If you have any questions about the action of the Commission, please contact Duane Dvorak of the Community Development Department. Sincerely, Patricia Miley, Secdetary Community Development Department B --Business, C --Conserv pn, PL --Public Use Lands, and R2--Two-Family Residential Zoning Districts. The lines run from the Swampy Acres substation to the Tagura Road facility. (Kodiak Electric Association) COMMISSIONER MENDEL MOVED TO GRANT a two (2) year extension for previously approved exceptions and variances that permitted 69 kV electrical transmission lines and towers (Cannery Transmission Line) to locate in B --Business, C --Conservation, PL --Public Use Lands, and R2--Two-Family Residential Zoning Districts. The lines run from the Swampy Acres substation to the Tagura Road facility and to adopt the finding of fact contained in the staff report dated July 10, 1964. The motion was seconded and SARRIED by unanimous voice vote. FINDING OF FACT 1. All the alternatives for this distribution line have been explored and the best alternative has been chosen. C) Request for Planning and Zoning Commission review and findings pursuant to Section 17.21.050(C) (Performance Standards) of the Borough Code to (1) determine if Lot 17, Block 1, Airpark Subdivision shall provide and maintain screening where it is adjacent to a residential use or district, and (2) define the screening required by Planning and Zoning Commission. (Thomas W. Templeton) 5OMMISSIONFR ANDERSON MOVED TO APPROVE that no screening must be provided and maintained between Lots 17 and 18 and Lots 17 and 16, Block 1, Airpark Subdivision, and to adopt the findings of fact contained in the staff report dated July 11, 1988. The motion was seconded and pARRIED by unanimous voice vote. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The size of the existing structure on Lot 18, relative to the size of the new business structure on Lot 17, makes the provision of screening redundant. 2. The residence on Lot 16 is not oriented towards Lot 17, and the new business structure on Lot 17 is located on the opposite side of Lot 17's common boundary with Lot 16. 3. The proposed structure will not have a negative impact on the adjacent properties due to noise. 4. The new business building and parking as proposed (see applicant's letter) should not significantly impact the existing use or adjacent uses. 5. The entire property is already fenced to delineate the property boundaries. Case 87-039. Request for a one (1) year extension for a -previously -approved variance that permitted an eight (8) foot chain link fence to project into the Shelikof Street right-of-way in a B --Business Zoning District. Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite; 410 Shelikof Street. (Ursin Seafoods, Inc.) SOMMISSIONER HEINRICHS MOVED TO GRANT a request for a one (1) year extension for a previously approved variance that permitted an eight (8) foot chain link fence to project into the Shelikof Street right-of-way in a B --Business Zoning District. Lot 19A, Block 18, Page 4 of 26 P6Z Minutes: July 20, 1988 Kodiak Townsite; subjec a the conditions of approval outlined in the staff report dated June 26, 1987; and to reaffirm the findings of fact contained in the staff report dated June 26, 1987. The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous voice vote. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The fence is constructed at the applicant's sole expense. 2. The applicant assumes any liability associated with said fence on city -owned property. 3. If at a future date the City determines that the fence must be removed from the City -owned property, the applicant or any subsequent owner of Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite, agrees to remove same without cost to the City. 4.• Since the land is publicly owned, no prescriptive right accrues to the user. Construction of the fence shall be in such a manner as to not reduce any required off-street parking or block the sidewalk. FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or intended use of development. which generally do not apply to other properties in the same land use district. The exceptional condition applicable to the intended use of the property is largely a perceptual one. Typically, the average property owner assumes that all the land out to the sidewalk or roadway edge is their "yard," and that they should be able to erect a fence of reasonable height around that yard. In addition, if the fence was built along the property lines, strips of City property would remain outside the fence. It is likely that this property would not then be maintained by the property owner, this could constitute a public health problem. 2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships. Strict application of the zoning ordinance would only allow the fence to be placed on the property lines. This is an unnecessary hardship when many other fences in the community have encroached on the public property without first receiving a variance. The Commission has also granted variances in the past for fences to project into road rights-of-way. 3. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare. Granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public's health, safety or welfare because the fence will not pose a line of sight problem along Shelikof Street either due to its height or placement in the right-of-way. Also, the conditions outlined below ensure that any future removal of the fence will not impose a cost to the public. The erection of the fence out to the Page 5 of 26 P&Z Minutes: July 20, 1988 sidewalk will hof Lly ensure that the small strip of .City property is maintained by the property owner to the benefit of the City. 4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary ro the obiectives of the Comprehensive Plan Granting of this variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan does not address minor structural developments such as fences. The main use of the property for storage purposes is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief 1s being sought by the variance. Actions of the applicant have not caused the conditions from which relief is being sought by a variance. The variance request will be decided prior to construction of the fence. 6. That the grantina of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the district involved. Fences are permitted in all land use districts. There were no further audience comments or appearance requests. VI PUBLIC HEARINGS A) Case 88-026. Request to rezone Lots 39 through 46, Block 12, Aleutian Homes Subdivision from RS--Single-Family Residential to R2--Two-Family Residential; and Lots 17 and 18, Block 8; Lots 1 through 6, Block 11; and Lots 7 and 35 through 38 and 47 through 59, Block 12, Aleutian Homes Subdivision from R1--Single-Family Residential to B --Business in accordance with Chapter 17.72 (Amendments and Changes) of the Borough Code. On the north side of the street from 521 through 1119 Mill Bay Road and -111 Birch Street (from Thwing's old key shop to the old Harvester building site). (Property Owners) (Tabled from the May and June 1988 Regular Meetings) LINDA FREED indicated three hundred fifty-one (351) public hearing notices were distributed on May 4 and June 3, 1988, for a total of 702 public hearing notices distributed. No public hearing notices were distributed for the July meeting. Two (2) display ads were published on July 6th and 13th in the Kodiak Daily Mirror encouraging public comments. Of the public hearing notices distributed, 19 were returned (several from the same property owners), 5 were in favor, 9 opposing, and 5 expressing nonobjection to this request. Staff recommended that. the Commission forward the request to the Assembly recommending approval of this rezone. In response to a request by the Commission, letters from the City of Kodiak and the Kodiak Island Borough School District had been received and were included with the packet materials. Staff also noted that property owners (or their representatives) of four (4) lots (Lots 47, 48, 49 and 50, Block 12) had recently requested that their lots be rezoned to R2 and not Business as had previously been requested. Regular Session Closed. Public Hearing Opened: Page 6 of 26 P&Z Minutes: July 20, 1988 Drain Seafoods, Inc. Box 492 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Kodiak Island Borough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615.6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 July 14) 1988 RE: Case 87-039. Request for a one (1) year extension for a previously approved variance that permitted en eight (8), foot chain link fence to project into the Shelikof Street right-of-way in a B --Business Zoning District. Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite; 410 Shelikof Street. (Ursin Seafoods, inc.)' To Whom It May Concern: Enclosed please find a copy of the materials, concerning the above referenced item, reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission at their regularly scheduled packet review worksession held Wednesday, July 13, 1988. If you have any questions or comments, please contact the Community Development Department at 486-5736, extension 255. Sincerely, Patricia Miley, Secretary Community Development. Department enclosures DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJ: RE: ITEM V -D Kodiak Island Borough MEMORANDUM July 13, 1988 Planning and Zoning Commission Community Development Department Information for the July 20, 198 Regular Meeting Case 87-039. Request for a one (1) year extension for a previously approved variance that permitted an eight (8) foot chain link fence to project into the Shelikof Street right-of-way in a B --Business Zoning District. Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite; 410 Shelikof Street. (Ursin Seafoods, Inc.) BACKGROUND Staff has reviewed the staff report upon which the original approval of Case 87-039 was made. Staff finds no indications of significant change that would alter the conditions of the site from what was existing at that time. The original staff report is attached for reference. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Commission grant a one (1) year extension for the variance previously approved by Case 87-039. APPROPRIATE MOTION If the Commission agrees with the staff recommendation, the appropriate motion is: Move to grant a request for a one (1) year extension for a previously approved variance that permitted an eight (8) foot chain link fence to project into the Shelikof Street right-of-way in a B --Business Zoning District. Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite; subject to the conditions of approval outlined in the staff report dated June 26, 1987; and to reaffirm the findings of fact contained in the staff report dated June 26, 1987. Case 87-039 1 P&Z: July 20, 1988 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: RE: Kodiak Island Borough MEMORANDUM June 26, 1987 Planning and Zoning Commission Community Development Department Information for the July 15, 1987 Regular Meeting CASE 87-039. Request for a variance from Section 17.54. Extension onto Public Property) of the Borough Code to (8) foot chain link fence to project into the right-of-way in a B --Business Zoning District. Lot Kodiak Townsite; 410 Shelikof Street. (Ursin Seafoods, ITEM VI -E 010(C) (Height - permit an eight Shelikof Street 19A, Block 18, Inc.) Thirty-one (31) public hearing notices were mailed on June 30, 1987. Date of site visit: June 23, 1987. 1. Applicant: Ursin Seafoods, Inc. 2. Land Owner: Same. 3. Request: For a variance from Section 17.54.010(C) (Height - Extension: onto Public Property) of the Borough Code to permit a eight (8) foot chain link fence to project into the Shelikof Street right-of-way in a B --Business Zoning District. 4. Purpose: To permit an eight (8) foot chain link fence to locate within the Shelikof Street right-of-way. 5. Existing Zoning: B --Business 6. Zoning History: 7. Location: Physical: Legal: 8. Lot Size: 9. Existing Land Use: CASE 87-039 The 1968 Comprehensive Plan identifies this area as Business. Departmental files indicate no further activity. 410 Shelikof Street Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite 15,550 square feet Outdoor storage. 1 JULY 15, 1987 P&Z ITEM VI -E 10. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North: Across Rezanof - Lot 39A, Block 19, Kodiak Townsite Use: Duplex Zoning: R2--Two-Family Residential South: City Tidelands Tract N-22 Use: Industrial Zoning: I --Industrial East: Lot 22, Block 3, New Kodiak Use: Commercial Zoning: B --Business West: Lot 20B, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite Use: Commercial (Anchor Bar) Zoning: B --Business 11. Comprehensive Plan: The 1968 Comprehensive Plan depicts this area for Heavy Industrial Development. 12. Applicable Regulations: The following sections of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Borough Code are applicable to this request: 17.54.010 Height --Extension onto public property. Fences, and walls not exceeding six feet in height may occupy any portion of a side or rear yard in any R district, provided that where such fence or wall projects beyond the front yard line or setback line toward the front property line, the following further restrictions shall apply: C. No fence, wall or hedge shall be erected or maintained on the public property beyond the front property line of any lot or parcel of land, except masonry or concrete retaining walls, and then only to a height not to exceed six inches above the grade of the earth such well is constructed to retain. A permit shall first be secured from the building official approving the necessity for and type of such retaining wall. COASTAL MANAGEMENT APPLICABLE POLICIES Business Development 1. Natural Features Dredge and fill, excavation, shoreline alteration 'and disturbapce of anadromous streams, tideflats and wetlands shall be minimized when constructing and operating port, harbor, dock, industrial and energy facilities - if permitted under applicable regulations. Consistent: Not applicable. This action does not include the above referenced facilities. CASE 87-039 2 JULY 15, 1987 P&Z ITEM VI -E 1 2. Natural Setting, Views and Access Development shall be .conducted in a manner that mitigates adverse impacts upon the Kodiak Archipelago; developers shall provide opportunities for public access to the shoreline and scenic views, to the extent feasible and prudent. Consistent: Not applicable. The property is not located along the shoreline or in a scenic area. 3. Dredge and Excavation Material Dredging and filling shall be consistent with ACMP Standards16 AAC 80.040 (Coastal Development) and 6 AAC 80.110 (Mineral and ,Mining Processing). Dredge spoil may be utilized in shoreside landfills if permitted under applicable regulations for the purpose of creating usable waterfront land. Consistent: Not applicable. This action does not involve dredging or filling activities. 4. Facility Design Developments in or over the water, such as piers, docks and protective structures shall be located, designed and maintained in a manner .that prevents adverse impacts upon water quality, fish, wildlife and vegetative resources and minimizes interruption of water circulation patterns, coastal processes and navigation. Consistent: Not applicable. This action does not involve development in or over the water. 5. Buffer Zones Buffer zones shall be established to the extent feasible and prudent, between business areas and major public transportation routes and between business development and adjacent, non -industrial properties in order to minimize conflicts between land uses. Consistent: Not applicable. This property is located in an industrial area. No buffer zones are necessary. 6. Accessory Development Accessory development that does not require a shoreline location in order to carry out its support functions shall be sited away floor the shoreline whenever there is a feasible and prudent inland altergative. this category includes parking, warehousing, open air storage,; waste storage, treatment or storm runoff control facilities or utilities. Consistent: Yes. This accessory development is located upland' 1 CASE 87-039 3 JULY 15, 1987 P&Z 1 ITEM VI -E 7. Wetlands Filling and drainage of water bodies, floodways, backshores or natural wetlands shall be consistent with ACMP Standards 6 AAC 80.070 (Energy Facilities) and 6 AAC 80.130 (Habitats). Consistent: Not applicable. No wetlands or water bodies are present on the site. COMMENTS: The purpose of this request is to permit an eight (8) foot fence to locate within the Shelikof Street right-of-way. In order for the Commission to grant a variance, all of the following conditions must be satisfied: 1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or intended use of development, which generally do not apply to other. properties in the same land use district. The exceptional condition applicable to the intended use of the property is largely a perceptual one. Typically, the average property owner assumes that all the land out to the sidewalk or roadway edge is their "yard," and that they should be able to erect a fence of reasonable height around that yard. In addition, if the fence was built along the property lines, strips of City property would remain outside the fence. It is likely that this property would not then be maintained by the property owner, this could constitute a public health problem. 2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships. Strict application of the zoning ordinance would only allow the fence: to be placed on the property lines. This is an unnecessary hardship when ,many other fences in the community have encroached on the public property without first receiving a variance. The Commission has also granted variances in the past for fences to project into road rights-of-way. 3. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare. Granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public's health, safety or welfare because the fence will not pose a line of sight problem along Shelikof Street either due to its height or placement lin the right-of-way. Also, the conditions outlined below ensure that any future removal of the fence will not impose a cost to the public. The erection of the fence out to the sidewalk will hopefully ensure that the small strip of City property is maintained by the property owner to the benefit of the City. CASE 87-039 4 JULY 15, 1987.P&Z TMVI-E 4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Granting of this variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan does not address minor structural developments such as fences. The main use of the property for storage purposes is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance. Actions of the applicant have not caused the conditions from which relief is being sought by a variance. The variance request will be decided prior to construction of the fence. 6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the district involved. Fences are permitted in all land use districts. RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds that this request does meet all the conditions necessary for a variance to be granted under Chapter 17.66 (Variance) of the Borough Code. APPROPRIATE MOTION: Should the Commission agree with the staff recommendation, the appropriate motion is: Move to grant a request for a variance from Section 17.54.010(C)1 of the Borough Code to permit an eight (8) foot chain link fence to project into the Shelikof Street right—of—way out to the sidewalk in a B --Business. Zoning District on Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite, subject to the conditions of approval outlined in the staff report dated June 26, 1987 and to adopt the findings contained in the staff report as "Findings of Fact" for this case. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The fence is' constructed at the applicant's sole expense. 1 2. The applicant assumes any liability associated with said fence on City—owned property. 3. If at a future date the City determines that the fence must beremoved from the City—owned property, the applicant or any subsequent owner of Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite, agrees to remove same withou€ cost to the City. 4. Since the land is publicly owned, no prescriptive right accrues to the user. 5. Construction of the fence shall be in such a manner as to not,re uce any required off—street parking or block the sidewalk. CASE 87-039 5 - JULY 15, 1A87 P&Z DNING KEY tESIDENTIAL R -I RESIDENTIAL R -Z RESIDENTIAL R-3 RURAL RESIDENTIAL BUSINESS INDUSTRIAL 3 CONSERVATION 3 PUBLIC USE LANDS S WATERSHED KODIAK TO CASE 87-039 LOT 19A ELK 18 KODIAK TOWN« Ursin Seafoods, Ind R,:=3251 NS US SURVEY Tr G WE: USS /534 USS /837Y B0R IND ISLAND N 311 NEW KODIAK 1206,40, 2?A' Ursin Seafoods, Inc. Box 492 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Kodiak Island Borough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 July 5, 1988 RE: Case 87-039. Request for a one (1) year extension for a previously approved variance that permitted an eight (8) foot chain link fence to project into the Shelikof Street right-of-way in a B --Business Zoning District. Lcjt 19A, ' Block 18, Kodiak Townsite; 410 Shelikof Street. (Ursin Seafoods, Inc.) To Whom It May Concern: Please be advised that the above -referenced request has been scheduled for !review and action by the Planning and Zoning Commission at their July 20, 1988 regular meeting. This meeting will begin at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska. Attendance at this meeting is recommended. The week prior to the regular meeting, on Wednesday, July 13, 1988, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough conference room, the Commission will hold a worksession to 'review the packet material for the regular meeting. You are invited to attend this worksession in order to respond to any questions the Commission may have regarding this request. If you have any questions, please call the Community Development Department at 486-5736, extension 255. Sincerely, Patricia Miley, Secretary Community Development Department Ursin Seafoods, Inc. Box 492 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Re: Case 87-039. Gentlemen: Kodiak Island Borough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 April 21, 1988 As you are aware, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted your request for a variance on July 15, 1987. Section 17.66.080 of the Kodiak Island Borough Code specifies that failure to utilize an approved variance within twelve (12) months after its effective date shall cause its cancellation. The purpose of this letter is to remind you that zoning compliance and/or a building permit for your development must be obtained within the twelve (12) month time limit or your variance will be cancelled. Since nine (9) months have already passed from the date of approval of your variance, please contact the Community Development Department as soon as possible so that we may assist you in applying for the necessary permits. If you desire further clarification, please do not hesitate to contact Linda Freed or Gordon Gould at 486-5736. Sincerely, ' Patricia Miley, Seczfetary Community Development Department Ursin Seafoods, Inc. Box 492 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Kodiak Island Borough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 July 16, 1987 CASE 87-039. Request for a variance from Section 17.54.010(C) (Height - Extension onto Public Property) of the Borough Code to permit an eight (8) foot chain link fence to project into the Shelikof Street right-of-way in a B --Business Zoning District. Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite; 410 Shelikof Street. (Ursin Seafoods, Inc.) Gentlemen: The Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting on .Tuly 15, 1987, granted your request for the variance cited above subject to the following conditions of approval: 1. The fence is constructed at the applicant's sole expense. 2. The applicant assumes any liability associated with said fence on city -owned property. 3. If at a future date the City determines that the fence must be removed from the City -owned property, the applicant or any subsequent owner of Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite, agrees to remove same without cost to the City. 4. Since the land is publicly owned, no prescriptive right accrues to the user. 5. Construction of the fence shall be in such a manner as to not reduce any required off-street parking or block the sidewalk. The Commission also adopted the following findings of fact in support of their decision: 1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or intended use of development, which generally do not apply to other properties in the same land use district. The exceptional condition applicable to the intended use of the property is largely a perceptual one. Typically, the average property owner assumes that all the land out to the sidewalk or roadway edge is their "yard," and that they should be able to erect a fence of reasonable height around that yard. In addition, if the fence was built along the property lines, strips of City Kodiak IslandBorough Ursin Seafoods, Inc. July 16, 1987 Page Two property would remain outside the fence. It is likely that this property would not then be maintained by the property owner, this could constitute a public health problem. 2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships. Strict application of the zoning ordinance would only allow the fence to be placed on the property lines. This is an unnecessary hardship when many other fences in the community have encroached on the public property without first receiving a variance. The Commission has also granted variances in the past for fences to project into road rights-of-way. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare. Granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public's health, safety or welfare because the fence will not pose a line of sight problem along Shelikof Street either due to its height or placement in the right-of-way. Also, the conditions outlined below ensure that any future removal of the fence will not impose a cost to the public. The erection of the fence out to the sidewalk will hopefully ensure that the small strip of City property is maintained by the property owner to the benefit of the City. 4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Granting of this variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan does not address minor structural developments such as fences. The main use of the property for storage purposes is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance. Actions of the applicant have not caused the conditions from which relief is being sought by a variance. The variance request will be decided prior to construction of the fence. - 6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the district involved. Fences are permitted in.all land use districts. Kodiak Island Borough Ursin Seafoods, Inc. July 16, 1987 Page Three THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT ALLOW ANY CONSTRUCTION TO BEGIN. You must first obtain zoning compliance and/or a building permit. Please contact this office for further details. An appeal of this decision may be initiated by any person or party aggrieved by filing a written notice of appeal with the City Clerk within ten days of the date of the Commission's decision. The notice of appeal must state the specific grounds for the appeal. Therefore, the Commission's decision will not be final and effective until ten days following the decision. Failure to utilize this variance within 12 months after its effective date shall cause its cancellation. Please bring this letter with you when you come to our office to obtain zoning compliance for any construction on your lot. If you have any questions about the action of the Commission, please contact me. Sincerely, Robert Robert H. Pederson, Associate Planner Community Development Department cc: Case File 5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance. In this case, actions of the applicant have not caused the conditions from which relief is being sought by a variance. The existing building was constructed in compliance with the Urban Renewal Plan, which precluded provision of off-street parking. Further, the variance will be decided prior to conversion of the kitchen area. 6. That thegranting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the district involved. An eating and drinking establishment is a permitted land use in the B --Business Zoning District. E) CASE 87-039.• Request for a variance from Section 17.54.010(C) (Height-- Extension onto Public Property) of the Borough Code to permit an eight (8) foot chain link fence to project into the Shelikof Street right-of-way in a B—Businese Zoning District. Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Towsite; 410 Shelikof Street. (Ursin Seafoods, Inc.) BOB PEDERSON indicated 31 public hearing notices were mailed for this case and none were returned. Three telephone calls were received indicating support for the approval of this request. Staff recommended approval of this request. Regular Session Closed. Public Hearing Opened: Seeing and hearing none. Public Hearing Closed. Regular Session Opened. COMMISSIONER ANDERSON MOVED TO GRANT a request for a variance from Section 17.54.010(C) of the Borough Codato permit an eight (8) foot chain link fence to project into the Shelikof Street right-of-way out to the sidewalk in a B—Bueinees Zoning District on Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Towaita, subject to the conditions of approval outlined in the staff report dated June 26, 1987 and to adopt the findings contained in the Staff report as "Findings. of Fact" for this case. The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll call vote. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The fence is constructed at the applicant's sole expense. 2. The applicant assumes any liability associated with said fence on City -owned property. 3. If at a future date the City determines that the fence must be removed from the City -owed property, the applicant or any subsequent ower of Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite, agrees to remove same without cost to the City. 4. Since the land is publicly owed, no 'prescriptive right accrues to the user. 5. Construction of the fence shall be in such a manner as to not reduce any required off-etreet parking or block the sidewalk. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or intended use of development, which generally Planning 6 Zoning Commiasion 11 July 15, 1987 Minutes i do not apply to other properties in the same land usa district. The exceptional condition applicable to the intended use of the property is largely a perceptual one. Typically, the average property owner assumes that all the land out to the sidewalk or roadway edge is their "yard," and that they should be able to erect a fence of reasonable height around that yard. In addition, if the fence vas built along the property lines, strips of City property would remain outside the fence. It is likely that this property would not then be maintained by the property owner, this could constitute a public health problem. 2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result la practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships. Strict application of the zoning ordinance would only allow the fence to be placed on the property lines. This is an unnecessary hardship when many other fences in the community have encroached on the public property without first receiving a variance. The Commission has also granted variances in the past for fences to project into road rights-of-way. 3. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare. Granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public's health, safety or welfare because the fence will not pose a line of eight problem along Shelikof Street either due to its height or placement in the right-of-way. Also, the conditions outlined below ensure that any future removal of the fence will not impose a coat to the public. The erection of the fence out to the sidewalk will hopefully ensure that the small strip of City property is maintained by the property owner to the benefit of the City. 4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Granting of this variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan does not address minor structural developments such as fences. The main usa of the property for storage purposes is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance. Actions of the applicant have not caused the conditions from which relief is being sought by a variance. The variance request will be decided prior to construction of the fence. 6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the district involved. Fancea iare permitted in all land use districts. F) CASE 87-040. Request for a variance from Section 17 19 040 (Yards) of the Borough Code to permit a sixteen by sixteen (16 x 16) foot garage addition onto the rear of the existing single-family residence to encroach six (6) feet into the required ten (10) foot rear yard setback in a R2—Two-Family Residential Zoning District. Lot 6, Block 35, East Addition; 1113 Mission Road. (Vern and Debra Hall) COMMISSIONER HEINRICHS requested to be excused due to a possible conflict of interest. COMMISSIONER RENNELL excused COMMISSIONER HEINRICHS. Planning 4 Zoning Commission 12 July 15, 1987 Minutes Ursin Seafoods, Inc. Box 492 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Kodiak Island Borough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 July 9, 1987 RE: CASE 87-039. Request for a variance from Section 17.54.010(C) (Height - Extension onto Public Property) of the Borough Code to permit an eight (8) foot chain link fence to project into the Shelikof Street right-of-way in a B --Business Zoning District. Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite; 410 Shelikof Street. (Ursin Seafoods, Inc.) Gentlemen: Enclosed please find a copy of the materials, concerning the above -referenced item, reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission at their regularly scheduled packet review session held Wednesday, July 8, 1987. If you have any questions or comments, please contact the Community Development Department at 486-5736, extension 255. Sincerely, Patricia Miley,(Eecretary, Community Development Department enclosures DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: RE: Kodiak Island Borough MEMORANDUM June 26, 1987 Planning and Zoning Commission Community Development Department Information for the July 15, 1987 Regular Meeting CASE 87-039. Request for a variance from Section 17.54. Extension onto Public Property) of the Borough Code to (8) foot chain link fence to project into the right-of-way in a B --Business Zoning District. Lot Kodiak Townsite; 410 Shelikof Street. (Ursin Seafoods, Thirty-one (31) public hearing notices were Date of site visit: June 23, 1987. 1. Applicant: Ursin Seafoods, Inc. 2. Land Owner: Same. 3. Request: ITEM VI -E O10(C) (Height - permit an eight Shelikof Street 19A, Block 18, Inc.) mailed on June 30, 1987. For a variance from Section 17.54.010(C) (Height - Extension onto Public Property) of the Borough Code to permit an eight (8) foot chain link fence to project into the Shelikof Street right-of-way in a B --Business Zoning District. 4. Purpose: To permit an eight (8) foot chain link fence to locate within the Shelikof Street right-of-way. 5. Existing Zoning: B --Business 6. Zoning History: The 1968 Comprehensive Plan identifies this area as Business. Departmental files indicate no further activity. 7. Location: Physical: Legal: 8. Lot Size: 9. Existing Land 410 Shelikof Street Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite 15,550 square feet Use: Outdoor storage. CASE 87-039 1 JULY 15, 1987 P&Z ITEM VI -E 10. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North: Across Rezanof - Lot 39A, Block 19, Kodiak Townsite Use: Duplex Zoning: R2--Two-Family Residential South: City Tidelands Tract N-22 Use: Industrial Zoning: I --Industrial East: Lot 22, Block 3, New Kodiak Use: Commercial Zoning: B --Business West: Lot 20B, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite Use: Commercial (Anchor Bar) Zoning: B --Business 11. Comprehensive Plan: The 1968 Comprehensive Plan depicts this area for Heavy Industrial Development. 12. Applicable Regulations: The following sections of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Borough Code are applicable to this request: 17.54.010 Height --Extension onto public property. Fences and walls not exceeding six feet in height may occupy any portion of a side or rear yard in any R district, provided that where such fence or wall projects beyond the front yard line or setback line toward the front property line, the following further restrictions shall apply: C. No fence, wall or hedge shall be erected or maintained on the public property beyond the front property line of any lot or parcel of land, except masonry or concrete retaining walls, and then only to a height not to exceed six inches above the grade of the earth such wall is constructed to retain. A permit shall first be secured from the building official approving the necessity for and type of such retaining wall. COASTAL MANAGEMENT APPLICABLE POLICIES Business Development 1. Natural Features Dredge and fill, excavation, shoreline alteration and disturbance of anadromous streams, tideflats and wetlands shall be minimized when constructing and operating port, harbor, dock, industrial and energy facilities - if permitted under applicable regulations. Consistent: Not applicable. This action does not include the above referenced facilities. CASE 87-039 2 JULY 15, 1987 P&Z ITEM VI -E 2. Natural Setting, Views and Access Development shall be conducted in a manner that mitigates adverse impacts upon the Kodiak Archipelago; developers shall provide opportunities for public access to the shoreline and scenic views, to the extent feasible and prudent. Consistent: Not applicable. The property is not located along the shoreline or in a scenic area. 3. Dredge and Excavation Material Dredging and filling shall be consistent with ACMP Standards 6 AAC 80.040 (Coastal Development) and 6 AAC 80.110 (Mineral and Mining Processing). Dredge spoil may be utilized in shoreside landfills if permitted under applicable regulations for the purpose of creating usable waterfront land. Consistent: Not applicable. This action does not involve dredging or filling activities. 4. Facility Design Developments in or over the water, such as piers, docks and protective structures shall be located, designed and maintained in a manner that prevents adverse impacts upon water quality, fish, wildlife and vegetative resources and minimizes interruption of water circulation patterns, coastal processes and navigation. Consistent: Not applicable. This action does not involve development in or over the water. 5. Buffer Zones Buffer zones shall be established to the extent feasible and prudent, between business areas and major public transportation routes and between business development and adjacent, non -industrial properties in order to minimize conflicts between land uses. Consistent: Not applicable. This property is located in an industrial area. No buffer zones are necessary. 6. Accessory Development Accessory development that does not require a shoreline location in order to carry out its support functions shall be sited away from the shoreline whenever there is a feasible and prudent inland alternative. this category includes parking, warehousing, open air storage, waste storage, treatment or storm runoff control facilities or utilities. Consistent: Yes. This accessory development is located upland. CASE 87-039 3 JULY 15, 1987 P&Z ITEM VI -E 7. Wetlands Filling and drainage of water bodies, floodways, backshores or natural wetlands shall be consistent with ACMP Standards 6 AAC 80.070 (Energy Facilities) and 6 AAC 80.130 (Habitats). Consistent: COMMENTS: Not applicable. No wetlands or water bodies are present on the site. The purpose of this request is to permit an eight (8) foot fence to locate within the Shelikof Street right-of-way. In order for the Commission to grant a variance, all of the following conditions must be satisfied: 1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or intended use of development, which generally do not apply to other properties in the same land use district. The exceptional condition applicable to the intended use of the property is largely a perceptual one. Typically, the average property owner assumes that all the land out to the sidewalk or roadway edge is their "yard," and that they should be able to erect a fence of reasonable height around that yard. In addition, if the fence was built along the property lines, strips of City property would remain outside the fence. It is likely that this property would not then be maintained by the property owner, this could constitute a public health problem. 2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships. Strict application of the zoning ordinance would only allow the fence to be placed on the property lines. This is an unnecessary hardship when many other fences in the community have encroached on the public property without first receiving a variance. The Commission has also granted variances in the past for fences to project into road rights-of-way. 3. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare. Granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public's health, safety or welfare because the fence will not pose a line of sight problem along Shelikof Street either due to its height or placement in the right-of-way. Also, the conditions outlined below ensure that any future removal of the fence will not impose a cost to the public. The erection of the fence out to the sidewalk will hopefully ensure that the small strip of City property is maintained by the property owner to the benefit of the City. CASE 87-039 4 JULY 15, 1987 P&Z ITEM VI -E 4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Granting of this variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan does not address minor structural developments such as fences. The main use of the propeity for storage purposes is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance. Actions of the applicant have not caused the conditions from which relief is being sought by a variance. The variance request will be decided prior to construction of the fence. 6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the district involved. Fences are permitted in all land use districts. RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds that this request does meet all the conditions necessary for a variance to be granted under Chapter 17.66 (Variance) of the Borough Code. APPROPRIATE MOTION: Should the Commission agree with the staff recommendation, the appropriate motion is: Move to grant a request for a variance from Section 17.54.010(C) of the Borough Code to permit an eight (8) foot chain link fence to project into the Shelikof Street right-of-way out to the sidewalk in a B --Business Zoning District on Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite, subject to the conditions of approval outlined in the staff report dated June 26, 1987 and to adopt the findings contained in the staff report as "Findings of Fact" for this case. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The fence is constructed at the applicant's sole expense. 2. The applicant assumes any liability associated with said fence on City -owned property. 3. If at a future date the City determines that the fence must be removed from the City -owned property, the applicant or any subsequent owner of Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite, agrees to remove same without cost to the City. 4. Since the land is publicly owned, no prescriptive right accrues to the user. 5. Construction of the fence shall be in such a manner as to not reduce any required off-street parking or block the sidewalk. CASE 87-039 5 JULY 15, 1987 P&Z ZONING KEY RESIDENTIAL R-1 \ID RESIDENTIAL R-2 i El RESIDENTIAL R 3 I RURAL RESIDENTIAL' 0 BUSINESS i•� INDUSTRIAL 0 CONSERVATION PUBLIC USE LAN • DS 1 WATERSHED III j� `ot t`tofl .r�,.0. OPIPi440.11 W401100 r KODIAK TOWNS CASE 87-039 LOT 19A BLK 18 KODIAK TOWN. Ursin Seafoods, Inc. R=325' 00741 �r° �$010v t ��rpiQ,, �rr`'�r d'r4a�e,���►ir���!415�;�4�.�` ii0.irT�''a ateattitteattitil USS /837-' USS /534 Re JND ISLAND US SURVEY 44 Tr G June 12, 1987 Ursin Seafoods P.O. Box 492 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Gentlemen: In reference to your request to construct an 8 -foot fence adjacent to the sidewalk at Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite, please be advised that the City of Kodiak has no objection provided that it does not interfere with the operation and maintenance of the sewage lift station in the area.- It should also be noted that should the City require the right-of-way in the future, the fence will have to be removed by you at no cost to the City. Please take this letter to the Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Department for zoning approval be- fore constructing the fence. Very truly yours, CITY OF KODIAK Herman T. Beukers Director of Public Works HTB/ak PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. P.O. DOA 1397. KODIAK. ALASKA 99615 PHONE (907) 486-5731 Kodiak Island Borough P.O. BOX 1246 KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-1246 HI1LrTFMOTHY; IS I_ t r.P ''O. BOX. R13,4019.033O UIIE� :AK99',15C Ursin Seafoods, Inc. Box 492 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 RE: Kodiak Island Borough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 June 30, 1987 CASE 87-039. Request for a variance from Section 17.54.010(C) (Height - Extension onto Public Property) of the Borough Code to permit an eight (8) foot chain link fence to project into the Shelikof Street right-of-way in a B --Business Zoning District. Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite; 410 Shelikof Street. (Ursin Seafoods, Inc.) Gentlemen: Please be advised that the above -referenced request has been scheduled for review and action by the Planning and Zoning Commission at their July 15, 1987 regular meeting. This meeting will begin at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska. Your attendance at this meeting is recommended. The week prior to the regular meeting, on Wednesday, July 8, 1987, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough conference roam, the Commission will hold a worksession to review the packet material for the regular meeting. You are invited to attend this worksession in order to respond to any questions the Commission may have regarding this request. If you have any questions, please call the Community Development Department at 486-5736, extension 255. Sincerely, Patricia Miley, Sbcretary Community Development Department KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 99615 ITEM VI -E PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE A public hearing will be held on Wednesday, July 15, 1987. The meeting will begin at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska, before the Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission, to hear comments, if any, on the following request: CASE 87-039. Request for a variance from Section 17.54.010(C) (Height - Extension onto Public Property) of the Borough Code to permit an eight (8) foot chain link .fence to project into the Shelikof Street right-of-way in a B --Business Zoning District. Lot 19A, Block 18, Kodiak Townsite; 410 Shelikof Street. (Ursin Seafoods, Inc.) If you do not wish to testify verbally, you may provide your comments in the space below, or in a letter to the Community Development Department prior to the meeting. You are being notified because you are a property owner in the area of the request. If you have any questions about the request, please call us at 486-5736, extension 255. Your name: Mailing Address: Your property description: Comments: ZONING KEY RESIDENTIAL R -I 0 RESIDENTIAL R-2 0 RESIDENTIAL R-3 Q RURAL RESIDENTIAL 0 BUSINESS INDUSTRIAL 0 CONSERVATION Q PUBLIC USE LANDS g WATERSHED KODIAK TOWN 87-039' CASE ;i, LOT 19A HLK 18 KODZAK TOWN. ,'li, ti Ursan Seafoods . Inc, R=325' USSUR VEy t USS /534 ND ISLAND Pot USS /837 WEST N41 NEW 1400 AK 27A 6 w 1 R1340180190 , lift—SI—N—• NORMAN—SR 5P.0. BOX 492 s KODIAK AK 99615 a t z, R1340180201 ,-K-NNEAR-6 RtETTc IML 4P.0. BOX 1272 5KODIAK AK 99615 d 7 B 9 0 R1340180204 ,'ABEPtA, T:I'M G PAMELA ,3 P.O. BOX 2287 4 KODIAK AK 99615 5 I6 7 B 9 0 R1340180208 , „'YStASK 7ANCHO"• T-E—OF AK 99510 / 5 6 R1340182067 ,a -AL -As 9 „ DI VISI ,Z ANCHORAGE Tla- 9 F N OF IGH WAYS AK 99510 13 14 15 16 I/ ,, R1340190010 ,o-SIYTt If'F i MARC ABET ;a P.D. BOX 3669 ;, KODIAK AK 99615 , 8' _ 03 9 ��F. P z 55 id i7 R1340190260 1,--BURfii"1-01216L—G L-MERI-E 5, P.0. BOX. 2203 , KODIAK AK 99615 6 R1340190300 1 2 4 5 6 9 0 -ECKU£C1JUSEv1T- TANS P.O. BOX 3696 KODIAK AK 99615 9 R1340190310 10 2HAR'OPF,FR'ED „P.O. BOX 405 12 KODIAK AK 99615 3 14 15 16 2 B R1340190330 19' 1411 trrT-tM O T-HY--6-J t 1 L 1E 20 P.0. BOX 2249 21 KODIAK AK 99615 22 23 24 25 26 27 R1340190341 20-0A-MONii-t1 YONG 29 P.O. BOX 1784 30 KODIAK AK 99615 31 32 33 34 35 R1340190342 37 -MCC-ONKEL --W L-s&W kY NE 3e P.O. BOX 2011 39 PALMER AK 99645 40 41 42 43 44 as R1340190351 46 CRI STAL�YI FANitIONi`EB-ARBA R -A 11 P.0. BOX 4301 18 KODIAK AK 99615 49 0 51 52 53 54 R1340190352 „ JENS-E-N STTYE-t: JE1tI 56 P.O. BOX 3970 52 KODIAK AK 99615 58 59 60 R1340190360 WiC�E/3UtAIV A P.O. BOX 3261 KODIAK AK 99' 2 6 R1340190361 7EISHOP, WILLIAM t. IERbSA a302 MARINE WAY 6KODIAK AK 99615 0 n 12 i3 4 81340190371 6 TIRE INENsC`W-7R 13411 HILLCREST ,KODIAK AK 99615 19 20 21 21 23 24 R1340190372 25 PtIGH.yflH-N 2613.0. aox 6B5 27KODIAK AK 99615 28 19 30 31. 32 R1340190382 33 34 WAtfiERStrilBi tS D 35P.O. BOX 500 36KODIAK AK 99615 3l 38 39 10 41 42 R1340190390 43NE-S-EiHtHENRY-6—EUNYCE 4p P.O. BOX 456 d5KODIAK AK 99615 46 47 a8 a9 50 6i R1340190401 52'F111140RE,KTP—tt—G R-I-CKI t. 53B0X 1558 54KODIAK AK 99615 55 56 51 58 59 60. R134019040.2 P.D. BOX 1504 KODIAK AK 99615 6 i 2 R1340190410 -GR-A-BER-rS-AMUEL a 5P.0. BOX 706 6 KO DI AK AK 99615 9 0 9 10 11 12R1340190420 13 T-HWI-NG•RAI4ODDI AT1IA'tYNN 14517 LOWER MILL BAY ROAD 15 KODIAK AK 99615 16 12 18 19 20 21 R1340190430 „ ALASK(HDUSYNrFYNtN 23 P.O. BOX 10.1020. 24 ANCHORAGE AK 99510 25 26 22 26 29 30 31 "ABtttA 32 P.O• 33 KODI R1220030160 T THY 2287 AK 99615 34 35 36 32 30 39 40lJML-101- 41ANDREW. 42 P.O. R1220030170 tANDR'EttitiFUR-113f / JOY/HALTER,LOREN' BOX 1700 43-KODIAK Alt -99-615 44 45 a6 47 48 49-BEARDSL-EYTAt-AN-f 5o P•O• 51 KODIAK R1220030180 SHARON BOX 361 AK 99615 51 53 54 55 56 57 58—JAMESttEtAND 599715 60KIRKLAND R1220030200 P NE JUANITA DR (2048) WA 9.8034 R11( )0100 iTTN1'L St Al-UUUS Ur ALA-5nit P.O. BOX 2997 KODIAK AK 99615 o 0 sr I ,Pp .O. 2K0DI R1100000110 ��R 2 OX 492 AK 99615 �------ 5 7 8 911RSlN o P.D. 1KODIAC R1100000120 0 AN DX 92 AK 99615 6 ,8i4Ai0-1CtdtftIUS-E— ,, P.D. o KODIAK R1100000130 BA-RB-ARA—B BOX 345 AK 99615 11 12 i3 5 #3R -S 1*, ,e P.O. ,KODIA R1100000140 ORM- N •. OX 92 AK 99615 2 14 5 R1100000150 16 I- A M.tAt CONStRt/C-T'L0N-00 2235 WEST HALLADAY ,SEATTLE WA 98199 V a 2 to-RM`A ;, 2235 ;,SEATTLE 81100000160' CON • YON CO WEST DAY A 98199 i0 i9 50 R1100010000 - KODI-AK,CITY OF- - P.O. BDX 1397 6 00000 ! /9,4 R.13 //T S vI -oc10 -- - — i? /334 o/f ©5430 oo3 0/6„o o© /1 o Oc o ©/bo alt ooI 0000 ZONING KEY RESIDENTIAL R—I RESIDENTIAL R-2 RESIDENTIAL. R-3 RURAL. RESIDENTIAL BUSINESS NDUSTRIAL CONSERVATION PUBLIC USE LANDS WATERSHED KODIAK TOWNS CASE 87-039 LOT 19A BLK 18 KODIAK TOWN. Ursin Seafoods, Inc. • R=325' US SURVEY 7/6 USS 1534--" flI3cj ri UND ISLAND U SS 1837-' SMALL BOAT HA • N31 P341 NEW KODIAK kUU1,4K 131_D NRCUGH I --', POST OFFICE BOX 146 KODIAK; ALASKA 99615 ( ) Conditional Use Permit ( )Exception N Variance ( ) Zoning Change: From: CODE SECTION INVOLVED: (-7_ 54, (74) NOTE: The application fee for all items covered by this form is $50. Conditional Use Permits, Exceptions, and Variance Applications also require the submission of a site plan. APPLICANT: PROPERTY: i&) Name Address City, 142-0 \Ai( I Ace-- s City, State, Zip 4"1 Lot Block (3—S Home Telephone Ligla — 57<g 4 Work Telephone e‹2T7 U1\14- TE Subdivision Name United States Survey 4 Section, Township, Range, S.M. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY: PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY: &0f- e:D-W.2)foAc vra; I have been advised of the procedurs i!r;civea with this request and have received a copy of the appropriate rccu:ations. ,-1(401aP) UrCrftrcin4,G. -16-8'7 Authcriz=d Agent. Ca:3 Prpperty Owner Date Date Application Acceetee: --(1 -7 3Y: RECEIVED FROM • CASH RECEIPT Kodiak Island Borough 10786 710 UPPER MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 j�^•-� % �^ 4\--C O 0 r�_i •-!—'y1C. DATE G } ` 1 1982 LA r --s -000-101-10-00 CASH aT f4A i' C: ji • i•-4.:;f'�]a ,1 010 - 000 - 105 - 01 - 00 PROPERTY TAX; REAL Mw Zr -C`d It rft. cig*=>�? tT r � 010 - 000 - 105 - 06 - 00 PROPERTY TAX, PERSONAL -'•'>TL va rl s• 1 1 010 - am - 111 - 61 - 00 PROPERTY TAX, LIENS ti`•4rjs rd 1 010 - 000 - 107 - - 00 PERSONAL TAX, LIENS *'I �K 0 its ^ �• 040 - 000 - 371 - 11,- 00 LAND SALE, PRINCIPAL F 040 - 000 - 371 - 12 - 00 LAND SALE, INTEREST fk! J.:).'VF: 1 1 051 -000-115-00-00 WATER SEWERi'}-50.-01.. Jh 1+'IIK. a..� 1 052 - 000 - 115 - 00 - 00 010 - 000 - 319 - 10- 00 PENALTIES, INTEREST , 1 I PER ATTACHED 5�•a "`C� t • +: E .��`" a ras• V:11 I I }f I U I Stv T • c.r •9•f CONDITIONS OF CHECK PAYMENTS... PAYMENTS TENDERED BY CHECK FOR OBLIGATIONS DUE TO TOTAL I 1 I S 1 THE BOROUGH ARE SATISFIED ONLY UPON THE CHECK BEING HONORED. RETURNED CHECKS FOR ANY REASON RESTORES THE OBLIGATION AS UNPAID AND SUBJECTS THE PAYER TO ANY CHARGES, FEES OR OTHER LEGAL LIABILITIES AS MAY BE APPLICABLE. CASHIER ©s PAYOR PAYMENT MADE BY: CHECK NO. CASH OTHER FMOB-511815