Loading...
KODIAK TWNST BK 14 LT 2 - VarianceWhite copy: File Yellow copy: Building Permit Pink copy: Applicant ZONING COMPLIANCE PERMIT 1. PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT Kodiak Island Borough imunity Development Department �IAill Bay Road, Room 204 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 (907)486-5736 Ext. 255 Zoning Compliance #: C — ( 0 0 Name: �(e--.11 1 -X71,J Address: `j(• 3'- a " 2. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Telephone: k Street Address: '3[4- 1-1-1 L L s " 4.AJ }L Average lot depth: Average lot width: Lot depth to width ratio: Lot, block, subdivision: t.4.3-7--10,.. &A, _ i 4 (. (4...01)1/46 -lb o. Proposed action consistent with Borough Coastal Management Program — Yes>L No „ t. E.. Survey, other (e.g. township/range):� .s ,ge'C7, Sides: 0 -A - w..._ , S' Aeyci 0 r3 Tax code #: ?_ 1 34 014 X a° �} Maximum projection(s) into required yards: , A_ iz, 2. (c . 3. DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING PROPERTY Zoning: IL a Square footage of lot: j c 44 �,"f Minimum lot width: Average lot depth: Average lot width: Lot depth to width ratio: Use and size of existing buildings on the lot: 17L.k e[-. Proposed action consistent with Borough Coastal Management Program — Yes>L No 4. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION (attach site plan) • 6r)13at,c-c l A 10 1 3 (e -SPG - M F 1 vA YA . -e�� 6 ' C�i-2 61,3s1 a � C4 3 3 5. ZONING REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION Type of structure(s): ". 5 Proposed action consistent with Borough Coastal Management Program — Yes>L No 1 /..7. % Minimum Setbacks—Front: 'i 1 Sod Rear: N-A.� .s ,ge'C7, Sides: 0 -A - w..._ , S' Aeyci 0 r3 Additional Setbacks: �} Maximum projection(s) into required yards: , A_ iz, 2. (c . Maximum building height: Maximum lot coverage: f.J.A, Number and size of parking spaces required: Off-street loading requirement: Plat related requirement(s): N • • Other (e.g. zero lot line): 6. CONSISTENCY WITH COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Applicable policies: 1VI-11/64,_ 1/vki 0/9,/"1 C"h-'1 ". 5 Proposed action consistent with Borough Coastal Management Program — Yes>L No Proposed action conflicts with policies (note policy and describe conflict): Conditions attached to Consistency approval to mitigate conflicts noted above: 7. APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I hearby certify That I will comply with all provisions of the Kodiak Island Borough Code and that I have the authority to certify this as owner, or representative of the owner, of the property(s) involved. Signed Title Date 8. SUPPORT DOCUMENTS ATTACHED Site Plan: Other: 9. BOROUGH STAFF APPROVAL Staff Approval: Signed Title Date Building permit #: Jerry Bongen Box 3523 ' Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Kodiak Island Borough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 February 20, 1987 Re: CASE 86-033. Variance request: Lot 2, Block 14, Kodiak Townsite. Dear Mr. Bongen: As you are aware, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted your request for a variance on May 21, 1986. Section 17.66.080 of the Kodiak Island Borough Code specifies that failure to utilize an approved variance within twelve (12) months after its. effective date shall cause its cancellation. The purpose of this letter is to remind you that zoning compliance and/or a building permit for your development must be obtained within the twelve (12) month time limit or your variance will be cancelled. Since nine (9) months have already passed from the date of approval of your variance, please contact the Community Development Department as soon as possible so that we may assist you in applying for the necessary permits. If you desire further clarification of this matter, please don't hesitate to contact me at 710 Mill Bay Road or call 486-5736, extension 255. Sincer Rob rt H. Pederson, Associate Planner Community Development Department cc: Case File Jerry Bongen Box 3523 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Kodiak Island Borough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 May 22, 1986 RE: CASE 86-033. Request for a variance from Section 17.40.010 (Projections into Required Yards) of the Borough Code to permit a 10 -foot by 32 -foot replacement deck to project 9.1 -feet into the required 25 -foot front yard setback in a R2--Two-Family Residential Zoning District. Lot 2, Block 14, Kodiak Townsite; 314 Hillcrest Avenue. Dear Mr. Bongen: The Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting on May 21, 1986, granted your request for the variance cited above and adopted the following findings of fact in support of their decision: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or intended use of development, which generally do not apply to other properties. in the same land use district. The exceptional condition applicable to the intended use of the property is largely a perceptual one. Typically the average property owner assumes that decks can be constructed anywhere on their property. In this case it is notable that the applicant is seeking permission for the deck prior to construction. The property also has unique physical features (topography and view of the harbor) that justify placement of a deck in the front yard. 2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships. Strict application of the zoning ordinance would only allow a deck to be erected in the side or rear yards. This is an unnecessary hardship when many other decks in this area and Kodiak are located in the front yards. Further, the topography of the lot and the view of the harbor dictate that the only practical location for the deck is the front yard. / Kodiak Island Borough Jerry Bongen May 22, 1986 Page Two The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health, safet and welfare. Granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public's health, safety or welfare. The deck will not block any potential views or encroach into easements or public rights-of-way. 4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan which designatesthis area for residential development. A deck will not change the land use or permitted density. 5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance. In this instance actions of the applicant have not caused the conditions from which relief is being sought by a variance. The variance request will be decided prior to construction of the deck. 6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the district involved. A deck on a residential structure is permitted in this land use district. An appeal of this decision may be initiated by any person or party aggrieved by filing a written notice of appeal with the City Clerk within ten days of the date of the Commission's decision. The notice of appeal must state the specific grounds for the appeal. Therefore, the Commission's decision will not be final and effective until ten days following the decision. Failure to utilize this variance within 12 months after its effective date shall cause its cancellation. Please bring this letter with you if you Kodiak Island Borough Jerry Bongen May 22, 1986 Page Three need to come into our office to obtain zoning construction on your lot. If you have any questions about the action of contact me. Since Robert H. •ederson, Assistant Planner Community Development Department pm cc: Case File compliance for any the Commission, please The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan because the Comprehensive Plan did not include the Pasagshak area. 5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is keine sought by the variance. In this case, actions of the applicant have not caused the conditions from which relief is being sought by a variance. The tract was platted in 1974 and purchased by the applicant in 1975. 6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the district involved. Single-family residences are a permitted land use in the RRI--Rural Residential One Zoning District. C) CASE 86-033. Request for a variance from Section 17.40.010 (Projections into Required Yards) of the Borough Code to permit a 10 -foot by 32 -foot replacement deck to project 9.1 -feet into the required 25 -foot front yard setback,.in a R2--Two-Family Residential Zoning District. Lot 2, Block 14, Kodiak Townsite; 314 Hillcrest Avenue. (Jerry Bongen) BOB PEDERSON indicated 39 public hearing notices were mailed for this case and 1 was returned, opposing this request. Staff recommended approval of this request. BOB PEDERSON read the public hearing response from Donna Jaeger into the record. Regular Session Closed. Public Hearing Opened: Seeing and hearing none. Public Hearing Closed. Regular Session Opened. COMMISSIONER KNUDSEN MOVED TO GRANT A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE from Section 17.40.010 of the Borough Code to permit a 10 -foot by 32 -foot replacement deck to project 9.1 -feet into the required 25 -foot front yard setback in a R2--Two-Family Residential Zoning District on Trot 2, Block 14, Kodiak Townsite and to adopt the findings contained in the staff report as "Findings of Fact" for this case. The motion was seconded. A discussion ensued amongst the Commissioners and Community Development Department staff. The question was called and the motion CARRIED by majority roll call vote. Commissioner Rennell voted "no." FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or intended use of development, which _enerall do not a•.1 to other •ro•erties in the same land use district. The exceptional condition applicable to the intended use of the property is largely a perceptual one. .Typically the average property owner assumes that decks can be constructed anywhere on their property. In this case it is notable that the applicant is seeking permission for the deck prior to construction. The property also has unique physical features (topography and view of the harbor) that justify placement of a deck in the front yard. P & Z REGULAR MEETING 4 MAY 21, 1986 MINUTES 2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships. Strict application of the zoning ordinance would only allow a deck to be erected in the side or rear. yards. This is an unnecessary hardship when many other decks in this area and Kodiak are located in the front yards. Further, the topography of the lot and the view of the harbor dictate that the only practical location for the deck is the front yard. 3. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare. Granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public's health, safety or welfare. The deck will not block any potential views or encroach into easements or public rights-of-way. 4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. • Granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan which designates this area for residential development. A deck will not change the land use or permitted density. 5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance. In this instance aceions of the applicant have not caused the conditions from which relief is being sought by a variance. The variance request will be decided prior to construction of the deck. 6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the district involved. A deck on a residential structure is permitted in this land use district. D) CASE 86-034. Request for an exception from Section 17.21.020 (Permitted Uses) of the Borough Code, in accordance with Section 17.26.020 (Permit Procedure), to permit a 21 -space mobile home park to locate in a B --Business Zoning District. Tract V and a Portion of Tract W, U.S. Survey 3218; 3256 Melnitsa Lane. (Michael H. Rasmussen) BOB PEDERSON indicated 59 public hearing notices were mailed for this case and 8 were returned, 6 in favor and 2 opposing this request. Staff recommended approval of this request. COMMISSIONER THOMPSON requested to be excused due to a conflict of interest. COMMISSIONER RENNELL excused COMMISSIONER THOMPSON. A discussion ensued amongst the Commissioners concerning the present lack of a quorum. Regular Session Closed. Public Hearing Opened: MIKE RASMUSSEN appeared before the Commission and expressed support for this request. TOM SWEENEY appeared before the Commission and expressed opposition to this request. TIM HURLEY appeared before the Commission and expressed opposition to this request. P & Z REGULAR MEETING 5 MAY 21, 1986 MINUTES 11Z.LAVI-C. Planning and Zoning Commission Kodiak* Island Borough 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 99515-6340 Z.. Cast etp —(933 Dear Planning and Zoning COMMI SSi On: On the suggestion to &low a deck to extend into the front yard of Lot 2, Block 14, 314 Hillcrest Drive, I am not in favor of this. It seems many variances are granted in Kodiak --the terrain is unique and poses building challenges. However, if my direct neighbor extended his front yard, then I'd be requesting to do the same when I build ori the -lots next door and with d precedent, it'd be hard to refuse me. I believe erring from the zoning requirement may.present a fire hazard. However., as you are in Kodiak and I am in San Diego, please consider all factors and vote whatever way serves community safety standards. Sincerely., —1-01.11/ta Donna Jaeger P. 0. Box 3064 San Diego, CA 92103 MAY 2 0 1986 Jerry Bongen Box 3523 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Kodiak islandB�rough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 May 15, 1986 RE: CASE 86-033.. Request fora variance from Section 17.40.010 (Projections into Required Yards) of the Borough Code to permit a 10 -foot by 32 -foot replacement deck to project 9.1 -feet into the required 25 -foot front yard setback in a R2--Two-Family Residential Zoning District Lot 2, Block 14, Kodiak Townsite; 314'Hillcrest Avenue. Dear Mr. Bongen: Enclosed please find a copy of.the materials, concerning the above -referenced item, reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission at'their regularly :scheduled packet review session held Wednesday, May'14, 1986. If you have any questions .or comments, please contact the Community Develop- ment Department.at 486-5736, extension 255. Sincerely, Patricia Miley, U Secretary . Community Development Department enclosures cc: Case File Kodiak Island Borough MEMORANDUM DATE: May 12, 1986 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Community Development Departrnent SUBJECT: Information for the May 21, 1986 Regular Meeting ITEM VI -C RE: CASE 86-033. Request for a variance from Section 17.40.010 (Projections into Required Yards) of the Borough Code to permit a 10 -foot by 32 -foot replacement deck to project 9.1 -feet into the required 25 -foot front yard setback in a R2--Two-Family Residential Zoning District. Lot 2, Block 14, Kodiak Townsite; 314 Hillcrest Avenue. (Jerry Bongen) Thirty-nine (39) public hearing notices were mailed on May 2, 1986. 1. Applicant: Jerry Bongen 2. Land Owner: Same. 3. Request: For a variance from Section 17.40.010 (Projections into Required Yards) of the Borough Code to permit a 10 -foot by 32 -foot replacement deck to project 9.1 -feet into the required 25 -foot front yard setback in a R2--Two-Family. Residential Zoning District. 4. Purpose: To permit a 10 -foot by 32 -foot replacement deck to be constructed on the front of the residence. 5. Existing Zoning: R2--Two-Family Residential 6. Zoning History: The 1968 Comprehensive Plan identifies this area as Residential -R2. Departmental files indicate no further activity. 7. Location: Physical: 314 Hillcrest Avenue Legal: Lot 2, Block 14, Kodiak Townsite 8. Lot Size: 7,245 square feet 9. Existing Land Use: A residential structure (duplex) that has been damaged by fire. 10. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North: U.S. Survey 3945 CASE 86-033 1 MAY 21, 1986 P&Z ITEM VI -C Use: Vacant open space Zoning: C --Conservation South: Lot 23A, Block 19, Kodiak Townsite Use: Single -Family Residence Zoning: R2--Two-Family Residential East: Lot 3, Block 14, Kodiak Townsite Use: Vacant Zoning: R2--Two-Family Residential West: Lot 1A, Block 14, Kodiak Townsite Use: Single -Family Residence Zoning: R2--Two-Family Residential 11. Comprehensive Plan: The 1968 Comprehensive Plan depicts this area for High Density Residential development. 12. Applicable Regulations: The following sections of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Borough Code are applicable to this request: 17.40.010 Projections into required yards. A. Outside stairways, fire escapes, porches, decks or landing places, if unroofed and unenclosed, may extend into a required side yard for a distance not to exceed four feet or into a required rear yard for a distance not to exceed twelve feet, but never more than one-half the distance of any required yard. COMMENTS: The purpose of this request is to permit construction of a 10 -foot by 32 -foot replacement deck on the front of the residence. The original deck and a portion of the structure were damaged in a fire last winter. A building permit has been issued for repairs to the residence. This request is now before the Commission because section 17.40.010 (Projections into Required Yards) does not permit decks to extend in to required front yards. In order for the Commission to grant a variance, all of the following conditions must be satisfied: 1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or intended use of development, which generally do not apply to other properties in the same land use district. The exceptional condition applicable to the intended use of the property is largely a perceptual one. Typically the average property owner assumes that decks can be constructed anywhere on their property. In this case it is notable that the applicant is seeking permission for the deck prior to construction. The property also has unique physical features (topography and view of the harbor) that justify placement of a deck in the front yard. 2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships. CASE 86-033 2 MAY 21, 1986 P&Z ITEM VI -C Strict application of the zoning ordinance would only allow a deck to be erected in the side or rear yards. This is an unnecessary hardship when many other decks in this area and Kodiak are located in the front yards. Further, the topography of the lot and the view of the harbor dictate that the only practical location for the deck is the front yard. 3. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare. Granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public's health, safety or welfare. The deck will not block any potential views or encroach into easements or public rights-of-way. 4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan which designates this area for residential development. A deck will not change the land use or permitted density. 5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance. In this instance actions of the applicant have not caused the conditions from which relief is being sought by a variance. The variance request will be decided prior to construction of the deck. 6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the district involved. A deck on a residential structure is permitted in this land use district. RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds that this request does meet all the conditions necessary for a variance to be granted under Chapter 17.66 (Variance) of the Borough Code. APPROPRIATE MOTION: Should the Commission agree with the staff recommendation, the appropriate motion is specified below: Move to grant a request for a variance from Section 17.40.010 of the Borough Code to permit a 10 -foot by 32 -foot replacement deck to project 9.1 -feet into the required 25 -foot front yard setback in a R2--Two-Family Residential Zoning District on Lot 2, Block 14, Kodiak Townsite and to adopt the findings contained in the staff report as "Findings of Fact" for this case. CASE 86-033 3 MAY 21, 1986 P&Z />77. -y.-)27 gyp( -Tv( 7 f3-vvi)(i-vt/Th f -d d -y)? yi___ U)-(1 /Yr 6 )3i) .1(/ T 7)7,721 o 6 .2- s'1°-7- 2 4/0 Q2C1 V 7 .0 d,),_ . ify--/— -0 -,..9 -0 g 71///PC0 TV ("V (?_(//_ .cT,1 /72- r?" say) Tira FP* C1 -1- 32o ?)? 7TroPw5 Y"72 oi ??Wir/0 orp , if VW/pp (71477a ( 7') y/dul i9 (pc/10 )2,00AN t)ly (7Y -2-Y AA 62279?)? -04 (-07-7-- -950') )0-1/1/V (-7/V) 9__A -go- 171, re 197 pgrAv cs P P7 % <:7%.;9. reAsts .(;Tar lc do) 0 - A AS - ouiLi OF .44 boa 4.5 TR A • ..7.* • 66666 OOOO )0 • on... • 1 . e Roy A. usfici7::;;;4; .$ ‘r- t t'OF UFESSI ON M. ci?.tsimmy QVILTio• y hereby ccrtify that I have surveyed the following described property: LC / rOPWV.5/77 Si- 2 5 3 7- 5 etla'At AL AS.eA. and that she improvements situated thereon are within the property lines and do not overlap or encroach on the property lying adjacent thereto. tha-. no improvements on property lying adjacent thereto encroach on the premises in question and that there are no roadways. transmis- sion lines or other visible casements on said property execpt as indi- cated hereon. Dated this /.6day19 54 ROY A. ECKLL/ND • Resnisters4 LELKI Liar- '-••••-‘,%1 • • • ri," • • • ••••‘ .•" ft. r• r'r ••• 74; "..'..1;;;,..‘",'N--) • ;s: 4 "t; -14: -"N • 'Irm.irt, • ri . •-. ;•.: '3 - !ek US SURVEY 444 Tr G .04140,01/48,11** -• LL. 4011110 "11711) 06 41° ) CASE 86-033 LOT 2, BLK 14, KODIAIC TOWNSITE Jerry Bongen• R=325' 1.-\* • Qo • 4 ZONING KEY', RESIDENTiAL, -I:: RESIDENTIAL R-2. _ .':; • , --, - - --.N . ,. RESIDENTIAL R-1"' "/ RURAL- RESIDENTIAL. BUSINESS INLJUTRIAL:--1,-I---:!: • • • • CONSERVATION • PUBLIC USE... -LANDS; • [2 -.WATERSHEDS. -4'-"; .. • - .< • ••••....7:4",T"'"; C uss • • • Jerry Bongen Box 3523 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Kodiak Island Borough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 May 2, 1986 : CASE 86-033. Request for a variance from Section 17.40.010 (Projections into Required Yards) of the Borough Code to permit a 10 -foot by 32 -foot replacement deck to project 9.1 -feet into*the required 25-foot.front yard setback in a R2--Two-Family Residential Zoning District. Lot 2, Block 14, Kodiak Townsite; 314 Hillcrest Avenue. Dear Mr. Bongen: Please be advised that the above -referenced request has been scheduled for review and action by the Planning and Zoning Commission at their May 21, 1986 regular meeting. This meeting will begin at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska. Your attendance at this meeting is recommended. The week prior to the regular meeting, on Wednesday, May 14, 1986, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough conference room, the Commission will hold a worksession to review the packet material for the regular meeting. You are invited to attend this worksession in order to respond to any questions the Commission may have regarding this request. If you have any questions, please call the Community Development Department at 486-5736, extension 255. Sincerely, Patricia Miley, Secr tary Community Development Department cc: Case File . KODIAK. ISLAND BOROUGH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 99.615 ITEM VI -C Put :C7 HEARING NOTICE A public hearing will be held on Wednesday, May 21, 1986. The meeting will begin at 7:30 p.m.. in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill. Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska, before the Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission, to'hear comments, if any, on the following request: CASE 86-033. Request fora variance from Section 17.40.010 (Projections into Required Yards) of. the Borough Code to permit a 10 -foot by. 32 -foot .replacement deck to project 9.1 -feet into the required 25 -foot front yard setback in a R2--Two-Family Residential Zoning District. Lot 2, Block 14, Kodiak Townsite; 314 Hillcrest Avenue. (Jerry Bongen) If youdo not wish to testify verbally, you may provide your comments in the space below, or .in a letter to the Community Development Department prior t� the meeting. You are being notified because you are a property owner in the area of the request. If you have any questions about the request, please call' us at 486-5736, extension 255. • Your name: Mailing Address:, Your property description: ' Comments: _"• '�•^ ;- ;_ice ••" •' : s. :,:'.:. ` •x� ';rte,., M1;,i::y� '+•�� .;,; �., n:.,+'`. �•• �^,i•' �•1 `� "'A. Ss',^"� 'i "'! ' q .Sirsx .�1 A;XV n-ZVti11. 00 '0 r G et -03 5- 144, Akos R1340140011 FRANCISCO,JUDITH P.O. BOX 483 KODIAK AK 99615 R1340140012 KILLEN,MICHAEL B C SUSAN P.O. BOX 2868 KODIAK AK 99615 R1340140020 BONGEN,JEROME C ELIZABETH P.O. BOX 3523 KODIAK AK 99615 R1340140030 JAEGER,MARY 0 MICHELLE PO BOX 3064 SAN DIEGO CA 92103 JAEGER,HAR P.O. BOX 3 SAN DIEGO R1340140040 ICHE CA 92103 R1340140050 ROOT,VINCENT E MARY P.O. BOX 541 KODIAK AK 99615 R1340140060 HANSEN,STEVEN E LIBBY P.O. BOX 1482 KODIAK AK 99615 R1340190100 KINNEAR,BLAKE E KATHRYN • P.O. BOX 2743 KODIAK AK 99615 R1340190111 UGANIK INC SHEFFIELD ENTERPRISES P.O. BOX 10-2960 ANCHORAGE AK 99510 UGANIK INC P.O. BOX 10 ANCHORAGE R1340190130 R1340190151 GREGORY,JOYCE K 215 HILLCREST AVE KODIAK AK 99615 R1340190360 BISHOPeWILIIAM MCTC P.O. BOX 2337 KODIAK BISHOP,WILLIAM C 302 MARINE KODIAK R +190361 5 R1340190371 THREINENeC W JR 980 BUSH ST 0304 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94109 PUGHeJOHN P.O. BOX 685 KODIAK R1340190372 AK 99615 R1340190382 WALTERS,THOMAS D P.O. BOX 500 KODIAK AK 99615 R1340190390 NESETH,HENRY & EUNICE P.O. BOX 456 KODIAK AK 99615 FILLMORE,KIP W P.O. BOX 3411 KODIAK R1340190401 AK 99615 R1220030140 DICK,GIENN C VIRGINIA B P.O. BOX 2182 KODIAK AK 99615 ,R1220030150 TURNEReSAJDAK C GERDEN 5491 MINNESOTA DRIVE ANCHORAGE AK 99518 ABENA,TIMOTHY' P.O. BOX 2287 KODIAK R1220030160 AK 99615 R1220030170 OMLID,S/ANDREW,L/FURIN,G/ ANOREWeJOY/HALTER,LOREN P.O. BOX 1700 KODIAK AK 99615 ' KLLLv �.,,...— BEARDSLEYeAL:AN C "-"PON P.O. BOX 361 ;9615 KODIAK R1340190160 THOMPSON,DAVID W �. 311 HILLCREST ST • KODIAK I', 1615 R1340190171 BROOKS,IRIS M • P.O. BOX 2829. KODIAK AK 99615 R1340190180 JONES,DUKE E DONNA P.O. BOX 1604 KODIAK AK 99615 R1340190203 MONROE,MARY E LAURENCE P.O. BOX 1729 KODIAK AK 99615 DEW,C BRAXTON 310 COPE ST KODIAK DAMON,HI YONG P.O. BOX 1784 . KODIAK R1340190220 AK 99615 R1340190231 AK 99615 R1340190232 W00DLEY,MICHAEL 314 COPE ST BOX 3 KODIAK AK 99615 SHORT,ROSE P.O. BOX 4 KODIAK SHORT.R'SE P.O. BOX KODIAK R1340190233 AK 99615 40190234 99615 R1340190240 COFFLAND,KENNETH E SUSAN C/0 ASSOCIATED INC 326 CENTER AVE STE 103 KODIAK AK 99615 R1340190250 BURCH,ORAL E CHERIE P.O. BOX 2203 KODIAK AK 99615 R1340190260 BURCH,ORAL E CHEPT P.O. BOX 203 KODIAK x)9615 R1340190270 HANNAH,PETER M C/O GUDENAU E CO 1417 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK AK 99615 111340190280 PRYOR,JAMES E MARGARET P.O. BOX 3031 KODIAK AK 99615 BRODIE,ROBERT P.O. BOX 296 KODIAK R1340190290 AK 99615 R1340190300 PERROZZI,JOSEPH E JANE P.O. BOX 3696 KODIAK AK 99615 ZHAROFF,FRED P.O. BOX 405 KODIAK' R1340190310 AK 99615 111340190330 HILL,TIMOTHY E JULIE P.O. BOX 2249 KODIAK AK 99615 DAMON, I YONG P.O. BO 1784 KODIAK AK 99615 R1340190342 MCCONNELL,DWAYNE W P.O. BOX 928 KODIAK AK 99615 111340190351 CRISTALDI,ANTHONYEBAROARA P.O. BOX 4301 KODIAK AK 99615 R1340190352 JENSEN,STEVE E JERI P.O. BOX 3970 KODIAK AK 99615 0.s. -/e4 g6 -03 5 wz-, arc R/351- ea P.1351 o / Fo goo i13o/90 L01 R 0030 •-• 3 1- o0 US SURVEY 444 Tr G rs‘-t - N IN Ge KEY,' CASE 86-033 LOT 2, BLK 14, KODIAK TOWNSITE Jerry Bongen. 147.3251 4 Lai *-.44)#." .00 .404-,4"...r• 4atier, P- • • • 4 -id4 .7 lit 174 t4 OW 4P' 4••-41. 41%14.1..w.0. S 444. , Tr ,A" Tr k./ jest 2RESIDENTIL RA: e .-RESIDENTIAL R-2 ," - fRSIDENTIAL: ROFtpLtIDENTI BUSINESS INDUSTRIAL ICONSERVATIONPUBLIC USE LANDS WATERSHE • {.r-'•',i`.�r..r�r.e::.: . . i+:.. r. t. .."•.r.. . .y J.r«.�L.;� • '+ •' ..A t/'L.y'r.••. .• . w. .•_W, j df koO irtK ISLAND BOROUGH. POST OFFICE BOX 1246: KODIAK,.ALASKA 99615 Conditional Use Perm Exception Variance ( ) Zoning Changei='z`; From: •CODE SECTION'INVOLVED. NOTE.: The application fee for all itemscovered' by this form Conditional Use Permits, Exceptions, and Variance Applications also,}requ the submission of, a site plan. PPLICANT:''• United States Survey.4 I have been `advised Or, the procedur.?A ''i'::eived witit; this; request `and have received a copy af• the, appropriate:re^t,::t;ticns. ,Property: Oeiner; ; _. } ;;,Date te',xppiicatibn Acc_p:ei: CASH RECEIPT Kodiak Island Borough RECEIVED FROM 700 UPPER MILL BAY ROAD P.O. BOX 1246 KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 PHONE (907) 486-5736 07-11?_.4 " - 000 - 101 - 10 - 00 010 - 000 - 105 - 01 - 00 010 - 000 - 105 - 06 - 00 040 - 000 - 371 - 11 - 00 040 - 000 371 -12-00 010 - 000 - 322 - 11 - 00 010 - 000 - 322 - 17 - 00 010 - 000 - 341 - 50 - 00 010 - 000 - 341 - 51 - 00 010 - 000 - I 1 1 -61 -00 itr •W-1. -" `W-1 CASH PROPERTY PROPERTY TAX REAL PROPERTY TAX, PERSONAL LAND SALE, PRINCIPAL LAND SALE, INTEREST BUILDING PERMITS ZONING PERMITS SALE OF MAPS SALE OF COPIES PROPERTY TAX, LIENS PER ATTACHED .YALt—r, 4. 8005 DATE 21 198L2, • ...•(*.)ii.e .../V 0 :l: ' r . . ..) 't ,.: UAL I. 4.-- ' L k 414:4 . 11.1t.Y.C4:1 ,}r1 f'e • • 4 P f L. -,. ra • etil, 0,cf: v- AISlIcipile 4 .) , . an) t 4 .4 •,+ t) -ft Is' -"4 ' z,itiA,ttitere:244'., '4r -Sr .. Xerr'-'1' Cir el.44 NA t ( 1.3 MI ‘11.;)14 43.6p: .cx (it A rer• r• • (Jtor) —000 • It .41: A CONDITIONS OF CHECK PAYMENTS PAYMENTS TENDERED BY CHECK FOR OBLIGATIONS DUE TO THE BOROUGH ARE SATISFIED ONLY UPON THE CHECK BEING HONORED. RETURNED CHECKS FOR ANY REASON RESTORES THE OBLIGATION AS UNPAID AND SUBJECTS THE PAYER 10 ANY CHARGES, FEES OR OTHER lEGAL • LIABILITIES AS MAY BE APPLICABLE. TOTAL CASHIER es PAYOR 0 PAYMENT MADE BY: CHECK NO 1 tcA 0 0 LI CASH D OTHER FM08-511815 •