Loading...
KODIAK TWNST BK 8 LT 6A,B,C - Parking Plan ReviewKurt and Gabrielle LeDoux 219 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Kodiak Island Borough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 ber21, 1989 Re: Case 87-058. Request for Planning and Zoning Commission review and findings pursuant to Section 17.57.030 (Off-street parking—Location) of the Borough Code to: 1. find that it is impractical to locate any of the seven (7) required off-street parking spaces on Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, Block 8, Kodiak Townsite due to the size of the lot and the location of the existing structureon the lot; and 2. to permit five (5) of the seven (7) required off-street parking spaces to locate on another lot, within six hundred (600) feet of the structure, which permits the same land use as the required parking is intended to serve. Lots 6A, 6B, and 60, Block 8, Kodiak Townsite; 219 Mill Bay Road (Kurt and Gabrielle LeDoux) Dear Mr. and Ms. LeDoux: i The Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting on December20, 1989: A. Adopted findingnumber one (1) contained in the staff report dated December 19, 1989, pursuant to Section 17.57.030 of the Borough Code, that it is impractical to locate at least five (5) of the required seven (7) off-street parking spaces for the office/apartment located on Lots 6A, 6B, andl60 Block 8, Kodiak Townsite. FINDING OF FACT 1. The Planning and Zoning Commission finds that it is impractical to locate five (5) of the seven (7) required off-street parking spaces for the Kodiak Island Borough Kurt and Gabrielle LeDoux December 21, 1989 Page Two office/apartment located on Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, Block 8, Kodiak Townsite, because parking developed on Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C would be unsafe and of questionable benefit to the public because of the following: a. the ingress and egress to the parking area is unsafe due to its narrow width (9.4 feet) and the steepness of Upper Mil! Bay Road; construction of the parking lot would be detrimental to the adjacent properties due to the increased drainage; c. the location of the parking lot makes it unlikely that' the public would utilize the parking lot; and d. the topography is such that it would undermine the 'adjacent lot. B. Adopted the following finding in support of their decision, ;pursuant to Section 17.57.030 of the Borough Code, to deny relocation of the off-street parking required for Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, Block 8, Kodiak Townsite :to the off-street parking lot located on Lots 6 and 10, Block 14, New Kodiak Subdivision: 1. The relocation of five (5) off-street parking spaces would n1ot be effective in meeting the parking requirement for uses on Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, Block 8, Kodiak Townsite because of the following: a. the proposed parking is not located within the line of sight of the uses to be `served; b. the proposed parking would not be viable even with adequate identification of the individual spaces and their location; and c. the applicant indicated that the proposed conditions of approval could not be met even before the decision was made by the Commission. Kodiak Island Borough Kurt and Gabrielle LeDoux December 21, 1989 Page Three An appeal of these decisions may be initiated by any person or party aggrieved by filing a written notice of appeal with the City Clerk within ten (10) days of the date of the Commission's decision. The notice of appeal must state the specific grounds for the appeal, the relief sought by the appellant, and be accompanied byi the appropriate fee. Therefore, the Commission's decision will not be final and effective until ten (10) days following the decision. If you have any questions about the action of the Commission,' please contact the Community Development Department. Sincerely, Patricia Miley, Secret ry Community Development Department cc: Joel Bolger, Jamin Ebell Bolger & Gentry H) Letter dated December 19, 1989 to Jim Wheeler from Bob Scholze, re: Lot 3, Block 1, Russell Estates Subdivision - 1113 Selief. I) Letter dated December 19, 1989 to John Parker from Joel H. Bolger, re: Tract 0-1, U.S. Survey 3218 - 3215 Mill Bay Road. COMMISSIONER KNUDSEN MOVED TO ACCEPT the agenda with the additions reported by staff. The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous voice vote. IV. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING COMMISSIONER HEINRICHS MOVED TO 'ACCEPT the minutes of the December 20, 1989 Planning and Zoning Commssicn regular meeting as presented. The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous voice vote. V. AUDIENCE COMMENTS AND APPEARANCE REQUESTS KURT LEDOUX appeared -before the Commission and expressed support for ;Appearance Request "C " The Commission and Mr. LeDoux discussed the history. of the request. It was noted that at the time of the original variance request, Mr. LeDoux had no objection to providing the off-street parking on Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, Block 8, Kodiak Townsite; that subsequent to the granting of the variance, during consultation with contractors, 11 became apparent that providing the off-street parking on Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C was impractical; that Mr. LeDoux had been unable to obtain easements from other property, owners in the area for the off- street parking but that he could obtain a lease; and that Mr. LeDoux believed that there were reasonable alternatives for providing off-street parking other than on Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C. The Commission expressed concern about the future of the bullding including expansion of the professional uses, selling the building, and providing the otl-street parking required by the Borough Code. ` Page 20121 There were no further audience comments. A) Case 88-083. Planning and Zoning Comm scion annual review of a variance from Sections 17.03.100(1) (Airport Regulations) and 17.06.162 (Clear Zone) and 17.06.450 (Parking Zone) of the Borough Code which permitted a six (6) foot fence and outdoor storage to encroach fifteen (15) feet into the municipal airport clear and parking - zones where the fence and stored Items ,are not higher than the ground elevation of the runway in a Business Zoning District. Lots 6A-1 and 642, U.S. Survey 3098; 2025 and 2075 Mill Bay Road (Harold Jones) COMMISSIONER KNUDSEN MOVED TO ACCEPT the staff report dated December 7, 1989, as the Commission's annual review for Case 88-063: a variance which permits the erection of a six (6) foot fence and outdoor storage to encroach fifteen (15) feet Into the municipal airport clear and parking zones where the fence and stored items are not higher than the ground elevation of the runway in a B—Business Zoning District on Lots 6A-1 and 6A-2. U.S. Survey 3098, and to adopt the findings contained in the staff report dated December 7, 1989, as "Findings of Fact" for this review. P 8 2 Minutes: December 20, 1989 2. The transmission lines and access roadway are integral parts of the entire Terror Lake Hydroelectric Project and are essential to the operation and maintenance of the facility. 3. Tracts 0, H, J, K, and M of the proposed subdivision are contiguous to lands owned by they Kodiak Island Borough, Afognak Native Corporation, and Ouzinkie Native Corporation. 4. The contiguity extends the entire length of easements across lands owned by the Kodiak Island Borough, Afognak Native Corporation, and Ouzinkie Native Corporation, since there are no intervening ownerships not encumbered by easements. 5. Lands within the City of Port Lions, across which the transmission line passes, are contiguous to either Afognak Native Corporation land or to each other as the transmission line progresses Into Port Uons. The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous voice vote. _ i C) , Case 87-058. Request for Planning and Zoning Commission review and findings pursuant to Section 17,57.030 (Off-street parking— Location) of the Borough Code to: 1. find that It is impractical to locate any of the eight (8) required off- street parking spaces on Lots 6A, 68; and 60, Block 8, Kodiak Townsite due to the size of the lot and the location of the existing structure on the lot; and 2. to permit the eight (8) required oft street parking spaces to locate on another lot, within six hundred (600) feet of the structure, which permits the same land use as the required parking is Intended to serve. I Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, Block 8, Kodiak'Townsite; 219 Mill Bay Road (Kurt and Gabrielle LeDoux) CHAIRMAN HENDEL requested that a determination be made by the Commission regarding a potential "conflict of interest" The Commission ruled that Mr. Handel ,had! a conflict of interest. CHAIRMAN HENDEL PASSED THE GAVEL TO COMMISSIONER HEINRICHS. CHAIRMAN HEINRICHS recessed the meeting at 7:45 p.m. In order for the Commission to read the "additional handouts" presented to the Commission prior to the meeting. ' CHAIRMAN HEINRICHS reconvened the meeting at 7:50 p.m. COMMISSIONER HARTT MOVED TO ADOPT finding number one (1) contained in the staff report dated December 19, 1989 pursuant to Section 17.57.030 of the Borough Code, that i{ is impractical to locate at least five (5) of the required seven (7) off-street parking spaces for the office/apartment located on Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, Block 8, Kodiak Townsite. Per 4 o121 P & Z Volutes: December 20, 1989 FINDING OF FACT 1. The Planning and Zoning Commission finds that it is impractical to locate five (5) of the seven (7)'required off-street parking spaces for the office/apartment located on Lots 6A, 6B, and 60, Block 8, Kodiak Townsite, because parking developed on Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C would be unsafd and of questionable benefit to the public. The motion was seconded. The Commission, with Input from Mr. LeDoux, discussed the motion. COMMISSIONER KNUDSEN MOVED TO AMEND THE MAIN MOTION, changing the finding of fact to read: FINDING OF FACT 1. The Planning and Zoning Commission finds that it is impractical to locate five (5) of the seven (7) required off-street parking spaces for the office/apartment located on Lots 6A, 6B, and 60, Block 8, Kodiak Townsite, because parking developed on Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C would be unsafd and of questionable benefit to the public because of the following: a. the ingress and egress to the parking area is unsafe due to its narrow width (9.4 feet) and the steepness of Upper Mill Bay Road; b. construction of the parking lot would be detrimental to the adjacent properties due to the increased drainage; c. the location of the parking lot makes it unlikely that the public would utilize the parking lot; and d. the topography is such that fit_ would undermine the adjacent lot. The AMENDMENT was seconded and CARRIED by majority roll call vote. Commissioner Coleman voted "no." The question was called and THE MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED by unanimous roll call vote. j COMMISSIONER KNUDSEN MOVED TO ADOPT finding number two (2) contained in the staff report dated December 19, 1989 pursuant to Section 17.57.030 of the Borough Code, to permit the off-street parking required for Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, Block 8; Kodiak Townsite to be relocated to the off-street parking lot locatedjon Lots 6 and 10, Block 14, New Kodiak Subdivision; subject to the conditions of approval contained in the staff report dated December 19, 1989. FINDING OF FACT 2. Five (5) of the required off-street parking spaces for Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, Block 8, Kodiak Townsite, should be permitted to locate on Lots 6 and 10, Block 14, New Kodiak Subdivision, because Pape 5 of 21 P 8 Z M1nutes: December 20, 1989 even though these spaces are not adjacent to the office which they are Intended to serve, they would be safer and most likely used more by clients of the law office than would spaces developed In the rear yard where the office Is located. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. A parking plan for the Holmes Johnson Clinic located at Lots 6 and 10, Block 14, New Kodiak Subdivision, showing all off-street parking spaces and those off-street parking spaces designated for the office of LeDoux and LeDoux will be submitted to the Community Development Department within ten (10) days of this decision. 2. A recorded easement on Lots 6 and 10, Block 14, New Kodiak Subdivision (Holmes Johnson Clinic) in favor of Lots 6A, 6B, and 60, Block 8, Kodiak Townsite (LeDoux and LeDoux offices) for five (5) off-street parking spaces: The easement shall run with the land until the use(s) of Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, Block 8, Kodiak Townsite change and/or alternative off-street parking approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission is provided. I 3. Adequate signage to identify the designated spaces as the parking lot for LeDoux and LeDoux law offices will be as specified by the Community Development Department. 4. The off-street parking developed for 'the LeDoux and LeDoux profession office must comply with the requirements of Section 17.57.040 (Parking Lot Development Standards) of the Kodiak Island Borough Code. The motion was seconded. The Commission discussed the motion. COMMISSIONER KNUDSEN MOVED TO AMEND condition number three (3) to read: 3. Adequate signage on the face of the LeDoux and LeDoux law offices shall state where the off-street parking is located and adequate signage on the designated spaces shall specify the parking for LeDoux and LeDoux law offices parking exclusively. The amendment was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll call vote. The question was called and the MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED FAILED by roll call vote. Commissioners Heinrichs and Hartt voted "no." The Commission deferred adoption of findings of fact in support of their decision until the end of the meeting. CHAIRMAN HENDEL returned to the Commission. D) Case 89-061. Planning and Zoning Commission review and approval of a list of items to be excluded from an Administrative Decision upheld Pape 8 of 21 P 8 2 Minutes: December 20.1989 B) Community Development Department Plat Activity Report. There were no further reports. COMMISSIONER KNUDSEN MOVED TO CONTINUE THE MEETING BEYOND 11 P.M. The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous voice vote. XI. AUDIENCE COMMENTS SCOTT ARNDT appeared before the Commission. Mr. Arndt and the Commission discussed wetlands issues. MIKE ANDERSON appeared before the Commission. Mr. Anderson and the Commission discussed drainage plans. There were no further audience comments. XII. COMMISSIONERS' COMMENTS CHAIRMAN HENDEL expressed appreciation to Commissioners Heinrichs and Knudsen whose terms expire on December 31, 1989. Page 20 o121 The Commission also: (1) expressed appreciation to staff for the work involved in developing the Rural Development iZoning District; (2) decided to attend the Assembly packet review worksession prior to appeals from Commission decisions; and (3) noted that the Assembly and Commission had decided to meet quarterly in joint worksession. ; I - The Commission discussed findings of fact for Case 87-058. COMMISSIONER KNUDSEN MOVED TO ADOPT the following findings of fact for Case 87-058: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The Planning and Zoning Commission finds that it is Impractical to locate five (5) of the seven (7) required off-street parking spaces for the office/apartment located on Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, Block 8, Kodiak Townsite, because parking developed on Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C would be unsafe and of questionable benefit to the public because of the following: a. the ingress and egress to the parking area is unsafe due to its narrow width (9.4 feet) and the steepness of Upper Mill Bay Road; b. construction of the parking lot would be detrimental to the adjacent properties due to the increased drainage; c. the location of the parking lot makes it unlikely that the public would utilize the parking lot; and d the topography is such that it would undermine the adjacent lot. P d Z Mewtes: December 20. 1989 d • 2. The relocation of five (5) off-street parking spaces would not be effective In meeting the parking requirement for uses on Lots 6A, 65, and 6C, Block 8, Kodiak Townsite because of the following: a. the proposed parking is not located within the line of sight of the uses to be served; b. the proposed parking would not !be viable even with adequate identification of the individual spades and their location; and c. the applicant indicated that the proposed conditions of approval could not be met even before the decision was made by the Commission. The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous voice vote. XIII. ADJOURNMENT CHAIRMAN HENDEL adjourned the meeting at 11:15 p.m. KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION n/� I By: rGU µ de cihtr./,cd Robin Heinrichs, Vice Chairman ATTEST By: Patricia Miley, a retary Community Development Department DATE APPROVED: January 17. 1990 Pape 21 of 21 P a Z Minutes: December 20, 1089 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: RE: Kodiak Island Borough MEMORANDUM December 19, 1989 Planning and Zoning Commission Community Development Departmen Information for the December 20, 1989 gular meeting ITEM V -C Case 87-058. Request for Planning and Zoning Commission review and findings pursuant to Section 17.57.030 (Off-street parkingL-Location) of the Borough Code to: 1. find that it is impractical to locate any of the eight (8) required off- street parking spaces on Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, Block 8, Kodiak Townsite due to the size of the lot and the location of the existing structure on the lot; and { 2. to permit the eight (8) required off-street parking spaces to locate on another lot, within six hundred (600) feet of the structure, which permits the same land use as the required parking is intended to serve. Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, Block 8, Kodiak Townsite; 219 Mill and Gabrielle LeDoux) BACKGROUND Bay Road (Kurt At the worksession on December 13, 1989, the Planning and Zoning Commission requested that staff review Section 17.57.030 (Off-street Parking; -- Location) to see whether the Commission was bound by the code to allow an alternate location if it was found to be impractical to locate the existing parking requirement inthe rear yard of Lots 6A, 613, and 6C, Block 8, Kodiak Townsite. Staff reviewed the section in question, and it does appear that the code is permissive and the Commission is not required to allow the relocation of the parking upon the finding that it is impractical to locate the parking in the rear yard of Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, Appearance Request C Page 1 of 4 I P & Z: December 20, 1989 ITEM V -C Block 8, Kodiak Townsite. Staff has, therefore, rewritten the motion so that each applicable code section is provided an individual motion. If the Commission finds that it is impractical to locate the off-street parking on Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, the Commission will have to consider an alternative site. If the Commission finds that it is impractical to relocate the parking to another lot, or, if the Commission finds that it is not impractical to locate the parking on Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, the property owner will have to either construct the parking or abate the use of the structure for commercial purposes and return it to the residential use that previously existed. Staff has included with this revised staff report a vicinity map showing the location of the lots under consideration. In addition, a 600 foot circle shown for scale is centered on the right rear corner of Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, Block 8, Kodiak Townsite. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that it is impractical to locate five (5) of the required seven (7) off- street parking spaces on the Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, Block 8, Kodiak Townsite due to the fact that it would be unsafe and of questionable benefit to do so. In addition, staff recommends that the five (5) required off-street parking spaces be permitted to locate on Lots 6 and 10, Block 14, New Kodiak; subject to conditions of approval to insure consistency with Title 17 of the Borough Code. Provision of the five (5) off-street spaces on Lots 6 and 10, Block 14, New Kodiak Subdivision (the Holmes Johnson Clinic) in a B --Business Zoning District is a reasonable alternative location for the use in question. Utilization of an alternative parking lot would require the following actions: 1. A finding pursuant to Section 17.57.030 (Off-street Parking --Location) of the Borough Code that it is impractical to locate five (5) of the seven (7) required off- street parking spaces on Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, Block 8, Kodiak Townsite. 2. A finding pursuant to Section 17.57.030 (Off-street Parking --Location) of the Borough Code that the Commission finds relocating the required parking to Lots 6 and 10, Block 14, New Kodiak Subdivision a reasonable alternative. Appearance Request C Page 2 of 4 P & Z: December 20, 1989 ITEM V -C A parking plan for the Holmes Johnson Clinic showing all off-street parking spaces and those off-street parking spaces designated for the professional office of LeDoux and LeDoux. 4. A recorded easement on Lots 6 and 10, Block 14, New, Kodiak Subdivision, (Holmes Johnson Clinic) in favor of Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, Block 8, Kodiak Townsite (LeDoux and LeDoux professional offices) for the five (5) off-street parking spaces. The easement must run with the land until the use(s) of Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, Block 8, Kodiak Townsite change and/or alternative off-street parking approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission is provided. Should the Holmes Johnson Clinic property be used for parking as provided for above, only one (1) additional parking space for the residential apartment on Lots 6A, 613, and 6C would need to be developed in order to satisfy all off-street parking requirements. APPROPRIATE MOTION Should the Commission agree with the staff recommendation, the appropriate motions are: Move to adopt finding number one (1) contained in the staff report dated December 19, 1989 pursuant to Section 17.57.030 of the Borough Code, that it is Impractical' to locate at least five (5) of the required seven (7) off-street parking spaces for the office/apartment located on Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, Block 8, Kodiak Townsite. Move to adopt finding number two (2) contained in the staff report dated December 19, 1989 pursuant to Section 17.57.030 of the Borough Code, to permit the off-street parking required for Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, Block 8, Kodiak Townsite to be relocated to the off-street parking lot located on Lots 6 and 10, Block 14, New Kodiak Subdivision; subject to the conditions of approval contained in the staff, report dated December 19, 1989. Appearance Request c Page 3 of 4 P;8 Z: December 20, 1989 ITEM V•C CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. A parking plan for the Holmes Johnson Clinic located at Lots 6 and 10, Block 14, New Kodiak Subdivision, showing all off-street parking spaces and those off- street parking spaces designated for the office of LeDouxjand LeDoux will be submitted to the Community Development Department within ten (10) days of this decision. 2. A recorded easement on Lots 6 and 10, Block 14, New Kodiak Subdivision (Holmes Johnson Clinic) in favor of Lots 6A, 6B, and 60, Block 8, Kodiak Townsite (LeDoux and LeDoux offices) for five (5) off-street parking spaces. The easement shall run with the land until the use(s) of Lots 6A,'6B, and 6C, Block 8, Kodiak Townsite change and/or alternative off-street parking approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission is provided. 3. Adequate signage to identify the designated spaces as the parking lot for LeDoux and LeDoux law offices will be as specified by the Community Development Department. 4. The off-street parking developed for the LeDoux and LeDoux profession office must comply with the requirements of Section 17.57.040 (Parking Lot Development Standards) of the Kodiak Island Borough Code' FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The Planning and Zoning Commission finds that It is Impractical to locate five (5) of the seven (7) required off-street parking spaces for the • office/apartment located on Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, Block •8, Kodiak Townsite, because parking developed on Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C would be unsafe and of 'questionable benefit to the public. 2. Five (5) of the required off-street parking spaces for Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, Block 8, Kodiak Townsite, should be permitted to locate on Lots 6 and 10, Block 14, New Kodiak Subdivision, because even though these spaces are not adjacent to the office which they are intended to serve, they would be safer and most likely used more by clients of the law office than would spaces deve oped In the rear yard where the office is located. Appearance Request C Page 4 of 4 P 8 Z: December 20, 1989 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: RE: ITEM V -C Kodiak Island Borough MEMORANDUM' December 12, 1989 Planning and Zoning Commission Community Development Department Information for the December 20, 1989 Regular Meeting Case 87-058. Request for Planning and Zoning Commission review and findings pursuant to Section 17.57.030 (Off-street parking -Location) of the Borough Code to: 1. find that it is impractical to locate any of the eight (8) required off- street parking spaces on Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, .Block 8, Kodiak Townsite due to the size of the lot and the location of the existing structure on the lot; and 2. to permit the eight (8) required off-street parking 'spaces to locate on another lot, within six hundred (600) feet ofthe', structure, which permits the same land use as the required parking is intended to serve. Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, Block 8, Kodiak Townsite; 219 Mill Bay Road (Kurt and Gabrielle LeDoux) BACKGROUND The purpose of this request is to consider the practicality of locating eight (8) off-street parking spaces in the rear yard of Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, Block 8, Kodiak Townsite. If the Commission finds that it is impractical to locate the parking spaces on Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, the Commission will also need to address the conditions under which it would permit the parking to be located on another parking lot within six hundred (600) feet of the structure located on Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C and which also permits the same land use as the required parking is intended to serve. Appearance Request Page 1 of 6 P & Z: December 20, 1989 ITEM V -C On the advice of the Borough Attorney, staff was persuaded to treat this request separately from ongoing litigation between the Kodiak Island Borough land the property owner. Staff has, therefore, tried to be objective in the assessment of this case and, at one point, requested technical assistance from the Kodiak Island Borough Engineering and Facilities Department regarding an assessment of the subject property (see attachment). To summarize the comments of the Engineering and Facilities Department, it was determined that the development of parking in the rear yard of Lots 16A, 6B, and 6C would result in an impractical and unsafe parking configuration. This assessment is supported by the following observations: 1. The line of site for drivers exiting the proposed driveway onto the oncoming traffic lane of Mill Bay Road is blocked by a board fence on the adjacent property. 2. The proposed driveway passes between the LeDoux building and the neighbors board fence. The plat shows the width of the driveway as 9.4 feet. Minimum driveway width required by the City Code is 14 feet; the minimum driveway width required by the Borough Code is 12 feet. Regardless of either code, 9.4 feet is inadequate. Mill Bay Road traffic is downhill at the proposed driveway entrance further compounding the hazard, particularly when slippery road conditions exist. 4. The proposed driveway passes directly over a buried fuel tank. The fuel tank would have to be relocated. 5. Topography of the proposed parking lot site will drain the Jot to adjacent properties. If sod and topsoil are removed to construct a parking lot, surface water runoff will increase. 6 A sharp grade change exists at the rear property line; the earth is unrestrained and sloughing is evident, It would be necessary to construct a:retaining wall to correct this condition. 7. The proposed parking lot site is currently a lawn area. To convert this area to a parking lot and driveway would require removal of the sod and importation of crushed rock. It is unlikely construction costs can be justified by the benefits. Appearance Request Page 2 of 6 P 8 Z: December 20, 1969 ITEM V -C The report by the Engineering and Facilities Department does indicate that the parking lot can be constructed, but only at great expense and questionable benefit to the public. The Commission has two (2) choices in this case: 1. If the Commission finds that it is impractical to locate the off-street parking on Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, then the Commission will have to consider an alternative site proposed by the applicant. 2. If the Commission finds that it is not impractical to locate the parking on Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, then the property owner will have to either: (a) construct the parking; or (b) abate the use of the structure for commercial purposes and return it to the residential use that previously existed. The applicants have stated that it is impractical to locate the eight (8)'required parking spaces on the lot in the manner originally shown at the time the variance was granted. Therefore, the applicant requests the Commission to find that it is impractical to locate the off-street parking on Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, and to allow the off-street parking to be located on a suitable lot within six hundred (600) feet. To replace these spaces, the applicant proposes to acquire eight (8) off-street parking spaces in the parking lot located on Lots 6 and 10, Block 14, New Kodiak Subdivision (site, of the Holmes Johnson Clinic located down the street from the subject property). This action requires Planning and Zoning Commission approval pursuant to Section 17.57.030 or the Borough Code which states: 17.57.030 Off-street parkins --Location. All parking spaces required under Section 17.57.020 shall be on the same,lot as, or a lot adjacent to, the principal building that they service; provided, that if the planning commission finds that it is impractical to locate the spaces on such a lot, it may permit them to be located on any lot within six hundred feet of the principal building. All parking spaces required under Section 17.57.020 shall be located in a use district permitting the use which they serve. Appearance Request Page 3 of 6 P 8 Z: December 20, 1959 ITEM V -C Staff has determined that the Holmes Johnson Clinic does not have an additional eight (8) off-street parking spaces to provide for the use of LeDoux and LeDoux. The original parking determination for this lot indicated that six (6) spaces were required for the professional office and two (2) spaces were required for the residential portion of the structure. However staff has reevaluated the original parking requirement and determined that, based on new information from the Borough Assessing Department, the professional office use at LeDoux and LeDoux only requires five (5) off-street parking spaces rather the previously calculated six (6) off-street park ng spaces. The reason for this is the Assessor had previously included a ninety-six (96) square foot uncovered and unenclosed deck as part of the total floor area for, the structure. This additional floor area made the calculation for parking just over five and one-half (5.5), therefore the calculation was rounded up to the next whole number six (6). Without counting this additional floor area however, the calculation is less than five and one-half (5.5), therefore the figure is now rounded down. Staff has determined that the previously proposed driveway access to the rear yard could conceivab y handle the two (2) required off-street parking spaces associated with the residential unit if the driveway was not required to access the back yard for additional parking. In 'addition, the Holmes Johnson Clinic has an additional six (6) off-street parking spaces by staff's calculation. Therefore, the Clinic lot has more than enough space to accommodate the parking needs of LeDoux and LeDoux if the owner so chooses. Staff, therefore, recommends that it is impractical to locate five (5) of the required seven (7) off-street parking spaces on Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, Block 8, Kodiak Townsite. In addition, staff recognizes the difficulty in assuring that the public will use the designated spaces if they are located so far from the professional offices they would serve. For this reason, staff recommends that adequate signage be required' to I insure that the designated spaces are used only by the clients of LeDoux and LeDpux and not by other members of the public. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that it is impractical to locate five (5) of the required seven (7) off- street parking spaces on Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, Block 8, Kodiak Townsite due to the fact that it would be unsafe and of questionable benefit to the public, and that the five (5) required off-street parking spaces be permitted to relocate to Lots 6 and 10, Block 14, New Kodiak, subject to conditions of approval to insure consistency wth Title 17 of the Borough Code. Provision of the five (5) off-street spaces down the street at the Holmes Johnson Clinic in a B --Business Zoning District is a reasonable alternative location for .Appearance Request Page 4 of 6 P & Z: December 20, 1989 ITEM V -C the use in question. Utilization of an alternative parking lot would lrequire the following actions: 1. A finding from the Commission pursuant to Section 17.57.03? (Off-street Parking- -Location) of the Borough Code that it is impractical to locate, five (5) of the seven (7) required off-street parking spaces on Lots 6A, 6B, and li6C, Block 8, Kodiak Townsite. 2. A parking plan of the Holmes Johnson Clinic parking lot showing all spaces and those designated for the professional office of LeDoux and LeDoux must be submitted to the Community Development Department. i 3. A recorded easement on Lots 6 and 10, Block 14, Mewl Kodiak Subdivision (Holmes Johnson Clinic), in favor of Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, Block 8, Kodiak Townsite (LeDoux and LeDoux professional office building) for the five (5) off- street parking spaces. The easement must run with the land until the uses of Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, Block 8, Kodiak Townsite change and/or alternative off- street parking approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission is provided. Should the Holmes Johnson Clinic property be used for parking as provided for above, only one (1) additional off-street parking space for the residential apartment on Lots 6A, 6B, and 60 would need to be developed in order to satisfy all off-street parking requirements. APPROPRIATE MOTION I Should the Commission agree with the staff recommendation, the appropriate motion is: Move to adopt the finding contained in the staff report dated December 12, 1989 as the "Finding of Fact" for this case pursuant to Section 17.57.030 of the Borough Code;iand to permit five (5) of the required seven (7) off-street parking spaces for the office and apartment located on Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, Block 8, Kodiak Townsite, to be relocated to the parking lot located on Lots 6 and 10, Block 14, New Kodiak Subdivision subject to the conditions of approval contained in the staff report dated December 12, 1989. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Appearance Request Page 5 of 6 P & Z: December 20, 1989 ITEM V -C 1. A. parking plan of the Holmes Johnson Clinic parking lot located on Lots 6 and 10, Block 14, New Kodiak Townsite, showing all off-street parking spaces and those off-street parking spaces designated for the LeDoux and LeDoux office must be submitted to the Community Development Department within days of the date of this decision and prior to the issuance of a zoning compliance permit. 2. A recorded easement on Lots 6 and 10, Block 14, New Kodiak Subdivision (Holmes Johnson Clinic) in favor of Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, Block 8, Kodiak Townsite (LeDoux and LeDoux professional office) for five (5) of the required seven (7) off-street parking spaces. The easement must run with the land until the uses of Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, Block 8, Kodiak Townsite change and/or alternative off-street parking approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission is provided. 3. Adequate signage to identify the designated off-street parking spaces as the parking for LeDoux and LeDoux professional offices will be provided as specified by the Community Development Department. 4. The off-street parking developed for the LeDoux and LeDoux professional office must comply with the requirements of Section 17.57.040 (Parking Lot Development Standards) of the Kodiak Island Borough Codec FINDING OF FACT 1. The Planning and Zoning Commission finds that it is impractical to locate five (5) of the seven (7) required off-street parking spaces for the office and apartment located on Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, Block 8, Kodiak Townsite, because parking developed on Lots 6A, 63, and 6C would be unsafe and of !questionable benefit to the public. The five (5) required off-street parking spaces jare permitted to locate on Lots 6 and 10, Block 14, New Kodiak Subdivision, subject to the conditions of approval contained in the staff report dated December 12, 1989. Appearance Request Page 6 of 6 P & Z: December 20, 1989 r: J77.2?Ger eft iXzo� fQr,1:115 SPgceci ,4pprok, Z 6 Ty araq Co t- o Saci a Se 0,7' ren/ fr©,erli/ Tor com4/i/a 1-7/3 ce QMc- o5 e3 art L-e1©max &TA, ax Lam ©& AS - SURVEY Scale:. /' c 2Q' I hereby certify thai I have wreeerd the (&losing described property: Pa2roW or-Lo,•^G: BLoc.0 6 rocv vsir_e sued_ r .4,3-5. CS37-B and that•rhe bnprwmrnu'aitaud thereoaarwithin i1e property Tints and do not aalap a rnmesh no the properry lying adjacent rherer°. that no improvements on property lying sdjarnt ahatto encroach on the prmhea w puaum and ten there are no midway,. trannoia aim lints or other ricb a aria at said property except as mph. caredhaeoo. I!a¢dth' /—S,{ day of Rru/c/ 19 74. "- ROY .l Per USD Rcgiaurcd Land Surveyor 1Dtawn by: 1c (Dater vTL /u-/-1978 • • • • ! \ I I I 1 r I in 1 1 .115i 4- - 11 . s-•.:I'7.7.t.-.7:7).:I.V -41 II I 1 ' '.:',:.;./ I.! L i I i :7.;.:J:Hr.":",1/2 I: I 1, I ..„--i,,:,1 ,..t, v...4,1. . • l»c.......‘111.10 -• '1......... . .., ... :. ^. V illtai.v47,-;;;;:%±-it:4t..4C441:21411 11 ' , .. - • Wye. Mil v.P.Vi .N.C.i I 1.4... .2--v,•-v.rfr "-‘. '. N.• -r " . N. IJ _ .ra5 .• 41.-roL. r UrjM. irot0Ww- LOC Litt ORISHAXL Lot 1.-M•L''.a. Extrw4 SturnmE5'-; _Il c.> 7,02,1%5 ----- roLt.--.L. ta:. Ho. 4.7g .t5m1 A e ibita.L, L . . 1. Sari. NO 1. - . .. - vaoL.was ..+3msom 1 bOg 1 lob Z: IttL.K , ALLASL-V-, ' 1 WOL'4,'ES JOHNSON 71..3-C PLi...A-4 - ?.EN; c>=LI:: col -4-r Du., ' ....a. Dr JAMES K. 5 AKZ, CONSULTING 'N':II`Ir-IPI -. corm el.cnee. i 7R.LECP• C1-4 ..rensmcs. k.55-th1 air -Lt., . • .. tatast• ..fot 9, a...: Itz.i.x.7?)--;;;:-.:ct • . ..... ,...-.;..---e........-77.:: - •_ T.F;DOUX (Sz T.FDOUX ATTORNEYS AT LAW 219 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK. ALASKA 99615 1907) 486-4082 FAX: (907) 486-2664 November 10, 1989 Ms. Linda Freed Planning and Community Development Kodiak Island Borough 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Re: Parking variance; 219 Mill Bay Road Dear Ms. Freed: ANCHORAGE OFFICE: (907) 272.6868 SEATTLE OFFICE: (208) 824.6771 NOV 131989 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT Pursuant to 17.50.030 of the Kodiak Island Borough Code I am requesting that the Kodiak Island Borough Planning Commission make a factual finding that it is impractical to locate eight parking spaces on my property located at 219 Mill Bay Road.' I am further requesting the right to use Dr. Bob Johnson's parking'lot to fulfill seven of my parking requirements. I already have one off street parking space at my office. Dr. Johnson's. parking lot is approximately two hundred feet from my office. I am making this request based upon the difficulty in constructing a parking lot behind my property and the fact that such parking lot would be impractical to use, especially in winter.' As is set forth in the affidavit of Bernie Lindsey, a local contractor, it would be impractical to build such parking lot. There would be drainage problems and the opening would be quite narrow after shoring up the property next to my parking lot. There are no formal plats of Dr. Johnson's parking lot. I have obtained copies of the plans for Dr. Johnson office and have put in the measurements of the parking areas as is shown an what is marked as "A" attached hereto. As is shown on the plan there currently exist three separate parking areas around Dr. Johnson's office building. These spaces have been used for over twenty years; and there is sufficient turning space in all three lots for total off-street parking. Dr. Johnson also has ten parking spaces on the back side of his property against the fence along the property line with the ASHA apartments. There are log stops for these parking spaces. There is a large turning area for these parking spaces. Ms. Linda Freed Planning and Community Development November 10,,1989 page 2. Altogether, Dr. Johnson has 33 designated parking spaces based on spaces- being 8' x'20'. Dr. Johnson's building,! according .to the information provided by Craig Johnson, has a total area of 7050 square feet (4890 square feet'for the main level and 2160 square feet for the basement level). Based on the Borough cgde, requiring one parking -..space for every 300 square feet of building space, Dr. Johnson only needs 24 parking spaces leaving a surplus .of nine parking spaces. I I am also enclosing .a copy of my lease with Dr. Johnson, showing the spaces that. he is going to lease to me. I will the glad to produce any additional information that you' need. • Thank you. Very truly yours, KML/keo enc 401W IIP eDoux c.c. Joel Bolger /rte(�,/���aa,f-c ad:o //�/© CCJinU� , ; Sc . ' ',, )/ " - office .9 frOit - • ' - _ [Jr -A Ipu EL Tor or ci.Ae. gee 54 HOLMES - JOHNSON CLINIC. BASEMENT FloOR PLAy Ji •__754. C' conc»1 // • I • '• . 2 egir. ( • -ipso 1Vt 35.0 N 23026.56 E 19529.29 2/ 0 cr Z LISs 6 354.-96 -sq: ft. 206.39' 256.39 LEASE OF PARKING SPACES Lease made on the day of November, 1,989, between Dr. Bob Johnson M.D. (Lessor) and Kurt M. LeDoux of Attorneys at Law (Lessee). Lessor hereby agrees to lease to Lessee seven at his professional office building Alaska. The seven parking spaces are hereby incorporated into this lease. LeDoux & LeDoux, (7) parking spaces at 115 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, shown on Exhibit Lessee shall pay as rental to Lessor the sum "A", which is of Ninety Dollars ($90.00) per month due on the First day of each month. The rents may be increased yearly with a six months notice of any increase. The term of the lease shall be year to year with the right of either party to terminate this lease upon six months notice to the other party. This lease is subject to the Kodiak Island;Borough Planning and Zoning Commission's approval to permit Lessee to'use Lessor's parking lot to meet Lessee's parking space obligations., Date Dr. Bob Johnson, M.D. Lessor Date office\park.les Kurt M., LeDoux Lessee , 1 Kodiak Island Borough MEMORANDUM TO: Duane Dvorak, Associate Planner Community Development Department FR: Lee Beauman, Construction Inspecto Engineering/Facilities Department DT; December 7, 1989 RECF$ v ED OEC 8-1989 'COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DFPT RE: Your Case #87-058, Proposed Parking Behind the LeDoux Law Office 1 visited the LeDoux property with you on December reviewing the owners proposal to construct an eight to evaluate the feasibility of this proposal. From a practical perspective, the following facts proposal was not based on sound engineering, principles: 6, 1989 for the purpose of (8) space parking area and readily indicate that the construction or safety 1. The site line of drivers exiting the proposed driveway into the on coming traffic lane of Mill Bay Road is blocked by a board fence on the adjacent property. 2. The proposed driveway passes between the LeDouxBuilding and the neighbors board fence. Plat shows the width to be 9.41 feet. City.code requires 14 feet; Borough code requires 12 feet minimum driveway widths. Irregardless of code, 9.4 feet is inadequate. 3 Mill Bay Road traffic is downhill at the proposed driveway entrance Further compounding the hazard particularly when slipper'.y road conditions exist. 4. Proposed driveway passes directly over a buried fuel tank. tank would have to relocate. I The Fuel 5. Topography of the proposed parking lot site will drain the lot to adjacent properties. If sod and topsoil is removed' to construct a parking lot, surface water run-off will increase. 6. A sharp grade change exists at the rear property line,1 the earth is unrestrained and sloughing is evident. It would be (necessary to construct a retaining wall to correct this condition. 7. The proposed parking lot site is currently a lawn area. To convert to a parking area/driveway would require removal of Ithe sod and importation of crushed rock. It is unlikely construction', costs can be justified by the benefits. Duane Dvorak December 7, 1989 Page 2 If lack of parking space is a problem in the vicinity of the:LeDoux office, it is not apparent to the casual observer. It is my suggestion that common sense be considered when seeking a solution to this dispute. It appears that the applicant for variance agreed to construct parking spaces in an impractical and unsafe configuration. The grantor of the variance accepted this flawed proposal. Both parties erred. Parking can not be a significant problem as a result of traffic to this small law office. Call it a wash. MATTHEW D. JAMIN C. WALTER EBELL JOEL H. BOLGER. DIANNA R. GENTRY ALAN L. SCHMITT *ADMITTED 10 .YA.lHINDTON AND ALAENA DARD ALL OTHERS ADMITTED ro ALASKA SAM JAMIN, EBELL, BOLGER & GENTRY A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW 323 CAROLYN STREET KODIAK, ALASKA 99816 FACSIMILE: (907) 480-6U2 TELEPHONE: (907) 480.6024 REPLY TO KODIAK OFFICE November 21, 1989 Linda Freed Community Development Dept. Kodiak Island Borough 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Re: Kodiak Island Borough v. LeDoux Our File No. 4095-87 Dear Linda: SEATTLE OFFICE: 119 FIRST AVENUE SOUTH SUITE 320, MAYNARD BUILDING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 96104 FACSIMILE: (208) 823.8818 TELEPHONE. (208) 6227634 JOEL H. BOLGER The court has postponed the hearing on the motion for summary judgment in our case against Kurt and Gabrille LeDoux until 'December 29, 1989 at 2:30 P.M. Please keep me advised about the LeDoux's pending application to the Planning and ILoiiing Commission. JHB:ls 87L.004 Sincerely yours, JAMIN, EBELL, BOLGER I& GENTRY RECF IED NOV 22, 1989 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN': DEPT MATTHEW D.JAMIN C. WALTER EBELL JOEL H. BOLGER* DIANNA R. GENTRY ALAN L. SCHMITT .AOMITYEO TO WASHINGTON ANO ALAOIIA EARA ALL OTHERS AOMITTEO TO ALASKA RAR JAMIN, EBELL, BOLGER & Linda Freed Kodiak Island Borough 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak; Alaska 99615 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW 323 CAROLYN STREET KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 FACSIMILE: (907) 480.0112 TELEPHONE: (907) 480-6024 REPLY TO KODIAK OFFICE October 9, 1989 Re: Kodiak Island Borough Our file: 4095-87 Dear Linda: GENTRY SEATTLE OFFICE: 119 FIRST AVENUE SOUTH SUITE 320, MAYNARD BUILDING SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 98104 FACSIMILE: (206) 6835818 TELEPHONE: (200) 682-7834 JOEL H. BOLGER v. Kurt and Gabrielle LeDoux Kurt LeDoux called on the afternoon of October,5, 1989, with a proposal for settlement. He said that Bernie 'Lindsey had told him that it was impractical to build a parkingilot in the back yard. He said that Bernie said that a concrete retaining wall between LeDoux's yard and White's yard would be required. He also said that Dr. Robert Johnson was willing to allow Kurt to use seven parking spaces at the Holmes -Johnson Clinic. I said that I would pass this information along to you. I talked to Kurt again on October 6. I told him that I did not have an answer for him and did not have authority to settle in the manner he suggested. Please let me know if you want to take any further 'action on Mr. LeDoux's proposal. L +U JHB:cav .11-I.-4 c -C '11 Sincerely yours, JAMIN, EBELL, BOLGER & GENTRY 4095\87L.001 • °el H. Iger Orm I OC •,•agg Parcel Number Property Owner Address City, State, ZIP: Surveyed by ' : Date of Survey R1340080061 #219 MILL BAY LEDOUX, K.M. & G. #219 MILL BAY KODIAK, AK 99615 ML 3/89 RES & PROF OFFICE Effective Age: 15 years Cost as of 12/88 Style: Heating &'Cooling: - Exterior Wall: Roofing: Floor Structure: Floor Cover': Plumbing: Appliances: t Floor Area: 2,585 square feet Quality: Average Condition: Average/Good 25% One Story, 75% Two Story Baseboard, Hot Water Hardboard Sheets Composition Shingle Wood Subfloor Standard Allowance 12 Fixtures Standard Allowance Units Cost i Total Basic Structure Cost 2,585 57.21 147,890 Extras: Wood Deck WOOD STOVE Subtotal 96 11.441 1,098 1,092 2,190 Replacement Cost New 2,585 58.0 150,080 Less Depreciation: Physical and Functional ''Depreciated Cost <14.2%> 2,585 <21,386> 49.78 128,694 . Rounded to nearest $100 i Cost data by:MARSHALL and SWIFT %1 NO ENTRY; EXT REVIEW ONLY SAVCE #439. 128,700 A[ 'IONAL MISCELLANEOUS ITE( Balconies CBA Cement Balcony (square feet) FIX WBA Wood Balcony (square feet) FUB Basement HAB BGF Basement Garage Finished Area (square feet) RIN OUT Outside Entrance Below Grade(number) Fireplaces Si F Single One-story Fireplaces (number) S2F Single Two-story Fireplaces (number) S3F Single Three-story Fireplaces (number) Di F Double One-story Fireplaces (number) D2F Double Two-story Fireplaces (number) D3F Double Three-story Fireplaces (number) T3F Triple Three-story Fireplaces (number) Floor Covering FLO Floor Cover Allowance (dollar amount) CAR Carpeting (square feet or % of floor area) CER Ceramic Tile (square feet or % of floor area) HAR Hardwood Flooring (square feet or % of floor area) • PAR Parquet (square feet or 16 of floor area) QUA Quarry Tile (square feet or % of floor arae) RES Resilient Floor Cover (square feet or % of floor area) TER Terrazzo (square feet or 16 of floor area) Garage CPG Carport, Gable Roof (square feet) SUB Subterranean Garage (square feet - low-rise multiples only) I Plumbing Plumbing !Fixtures (number) Full Baths (number) Half Baths (number) Rough -ins (number) Porches OPS Open Slab Porch with Steps (square feet) ' RPO Slab Porch with Roof (square feet) RPS Slab Porch with Roof and Steps (square feet) WOD Wood Deck (square feet) SPO Enclosed'Slab Porch - Screened (square feet) KWP Enclosed Wood Porch - Knee Wall w/ Panels (square feet) SWP - Enclosed Wood Porch - Solid Wall (square feet) I • Stairways (Exterior) CST Cement Stairway (number of flights) SST Steel Stairway (number of flights) WST Wood Stairway� (number of flights) Miscellaneous APP Appliance Allowance (dollar amount) ARC Architect's Fees (percentage) BAC Single Line Backdated Cost Date CLI Climate Adjustment (both ENE and FOU) 1 ENE Energy Adjustment (1-3) FOU Foundation Adjustment (1-3) MUL User -supplied Local Multiplier ROU Roundieg Vrdttc ISrMlaemINWIi1111■ ■iwoi.moMmn.minm.iouilmOmlonmimMn: n111Mmmmmmi1Inmi■■■■■ ■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■r::.....::.■ ::...nnu .: ■31■:■1l E■■■■..■.■■■■:.■:::■■:1muni manol i•mll us ■n 1111 1111 ■■ ■ ■ rr■■■' �,:T 11::::� :. .-.I : ■■�■■■ ■._ : ■. uuuin ii 111 11111 ■a1■� : A:MUM 1 .•.•...• IIIIIIIFI11=B In i ®1I ::::::i1�:::::::I :..■■■■.. ■ ■■■■■■■rr ::��_m:::: IIIniViIn se Ie : _:::l iII 1111 I1 111111111111111 ■.Y�imar ■■ 1111, ■ ■■■■■■■■ t y, F7■■■ ■1■■1 1111■■■r ■r ■ ■ ■■■ ■ ■.. II4 1i•••••:•:: .•n..:� : ■■n■p■■■■ ■■ : o �■�� ■: ■" 1111 r■■■ ■r■ l' 111:1■ 1111■■. ■ ■■::.�i. E: : ... i■� lE■■■■E ■111111 ■n. ■■■. : •� a ... 3.. ... .....:.:....... ■n■■■■E■■1■■■■■■ 1::::::::: : • ■ :•E ::: •■1: ■■ :1■1 o:mi••ui 81:::::.:: ::�::::..: _:� n.i::::::::::::::::•• :. •••• ••uuE :Ea ::::=E:::1 ::::111111::::::� ■. Apl: 1C• ::::::� i 11■1 :::Lill :: id= •CE 1^n r.1:1g ;.,Ply: miff:n■ ■diu lr:`':C: '. ■��i■■ ■■ .uu.in•■n■::::::::: a:■•■■■■i ■■ ■■ ■■l ■■■ �i■�_■C i�E■■■■■■ ::�{i :1111 ■r: ■ ■■ ■■■: : ■ _■ ■■ ■11.11 ■■r nos IBiillllllllliii 111111:1 111 11111 1 MIM11111111 ■■■n'■■■ ■■■IDC, Ii■■■■■■■ ■ ■ n■ ■ ■ ■ : ■ 1111 ■■■■ ■■■ ::::::::.::::••.:•:::::::.::....:.. 111 E... E:..... ••U•••••• ih1EEEEE1111111 1lIlltlllIlllIIIllIll 111 1 E 11111 11 i1EEilE 1IEEEE1IllE I1u1111111111�l1 11111111ni 11 111111E 1111 11111 .11 111111 1111111111 1111911111,,:uI, ,llIl1lII1IlllI�1111IE„,,L fill ,i,_ 111W 1hIlII l,i 111111111 1111/111 IIIIIIIIEI�Iiii�E�!'i!1 s1111111111111111111111 -I.0 1111 .■.n■■■■ ■■■.■■■■■ ■■■■.■■■■a11■■■=■1■ ■■1:1__1 _ 111 1111 FORM A-2200.2 I © 1986 — Copies of this form may be purchased from MARSHALL and SWIFT i 1617 Beverly Blvd., P.O. Box 26307, Los Angeles, California 90026-0307 rcel Number Property Owner Address City, State, ZIP 6 - Surveyed by 6 Date of Survey CO 1 2 CO 2 996/5--- CO 9G/sCO 3 3 CO 4 .x,.25 Cos /S MARSHI; AND SWIFT RESIDENTIAL ESf IATOIR FOR ASSESSORS P/syo ogoo(, / 68( 6/9.8,e. 9`a/7 CQbOux k.7r). G. ko9 Q/goe2 277,-//d z 4 fiA ?96/6- I Type 1 Single Family wOc15. 3 Town House, End Unit 5 Duplex 2 Low-rise Multiple 4 Town House, Inside Unit Zip Code Quality 1 Low 3 Average 2 Fair 4 Good Finished Floor Area Effective Age CO 6 3, C. Condition CO 7 i 6- •7s Style 1 One -Story 2 Two -Story 3 Three -Story 4 Split -Level CO 6 Heating an Heating: 1 Forced Air ' 2 Gravity Furnace 3 Floor Furnace 4 Wall Furnace 6 Floor, Radiant, Hot Water 1 Worn Out 2 Badly Worn 5 1.1/2 Story Finished 6 1-1/2 Story Unfinished 7 2-1/2 Story Finished 8 2-1/2 Story Unfinished d Cooling 6 Ceiling, Radiant, Electric 7 Baseboard, Electric 8 Baseboard, Hot Water 9 Radiators, Hot Water 10 Radiators, Steam CO 9 2. Exterior Wall Wood Frame: I 1 Plywood 4 Siding 2 Hardboard Sheets 5 Shingle 3 Stucco 6 Masonry Veneer C010 —t Roofing 1 Composition Shingle 4 Wood Shake 2 Built-up Rock 5 Concrete Tile 3 Wood Shingle 6 Clay Tile 3 Average 4 Good 9 3-1/2 Story Finished 10 3-1/2 Story UnFnished 11 Bi -Level 5 Very Good 6 • Excellent 5, Very Good 6 Excellent Heating & Cooling: 11 Warmed and Cooled Air 12 Heat Pump System Cooling only: 13 Evaporative with Ducts 14 Refrigerated with Ducts I Masonry: 7 Common Brick 8 Face Brick 9 Stone 7 Galvanized Metal 8 Slate 9 Composition Roll C011 Number of Units (Low-rise Multiples only) ' GARAGE & BASEMENT GAT GDT GBU CPT TBA BMF BPF SF Attached Garage SF Detached Garage SF Built-in Garage SF Carport (flat roof) SF Total Bsmt. Area SF Bsmt. Min. Finish SF Bsmt. Prtn. Finish Description AD1 &WA S%ove OSP SLA PLA SFP DFP MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS BUILDING IL)06=9646 SF Open Slab Porch SF or % Slab on Ground SF or % Plaster Interior Number of Single Fireplaces Number of Double Fireplaces 10 Concrete Block e 10 Plastic Tile I GENERAL LAN ca= 02 SITI teoo = on PHY FUN LOC ❑ See back for additional miscellaneous items I ' Options 1 ADDITIONS AND REMARKS Cost s 760 Land Site Improvements Physical Deprec. Functional Deprec. Locational Deprec. AD2 s AD3 s • AD4 / $ RE1 2..19 JEWAy • Exr pevitoc, n,rlly RE2 SAVE ,1939 FORM A-2200.2 Printed In U.S.A. _Log. Owner Mailing Ad I._—Loa _ ..... 9 Property Address 01 b Permi Date Built M Reproduction Dept. Observed Physical Condition Exterior Interior Foundation 0 BUILDING TYPE AND USE 4. EXTERIOR 6. INTERIOR (Continued) 8. HEAT Combination Stores and 'Office 'Loft Hotel Store Kind Wood Front Side Rear Concrete Partitions ini hed None • Stove 1 Side 2 Sides Hot Air, Forced S.F. Lin. t. Lin. t. Hot Water S.F. Office Thea Gas Station Bank Conc. Block Wallboard Garage Conc: Reinf. Industrial Warehouse . Greenhouse Hospital G.isi,r 4}s Plasterboard Unit Healer Type Conc. Panels Plaster Stucco Concrete Block Combination Heat & Coolin 'Sheathing Other Type j, S.F. Insulation Story Height 3a p Other Air Conditionin Store Front Typ Wood Set Grade ngth No. Hoo Typ • 0 1. FOUNDATION • - Metal Set indow all Concrete Concrete Block ells and Ceiling Finish ood Studs Area Wood Posts ud Sills ROOF 9. PLUMBING 13. YARD IMPROVEMENTS Paving Plasterboard Combined Fixtures Grade Fences F Dep Flat QGable Hip #3 -Fixture Baths Type of Materic Joists, Wood He Plaster on Maso #2Fixtu re -Toilets ;�� Singe Fixtures ; 11 Joists, Steel Lath and Plaster 2. BASEMENT Truss, Wood 1 #Tubs SCELLANEOUS #Lavato s II Sprinkler Truss Steel Tile #Urinals one od Deck Full Cis Height Partial x S.F. Steel Deck Laundry Sinks Ii, Concret Dirt Floor Reinf. Co 7. FLOORS Kitchen Sinks #Shower Stalls #Hot Water Heaters Wood Floor Built-up Conc. on Grade #Gallons Kind Concrete Floor Corrugated Metat Conc. on Grade, Rei Reinf. Conc., Supported U;fS I da ilk-‘n+rwncc3 6 INTERIOR 3. FRAME Developed Area ood Posts & Booms, Avg. Apartment Rooms VWood Posts & Beams, Heavy Office Area ht Steel _Fr mg arae. 0 nfoiced Concr Small, Co Profession t Steel Columns and Beams Store Area light Heavy Fireproofed uilt-in I Other Buildings Area Floo BUILDING VALUE CALCULATION Item No. Area or Quantity Unit Cost Tot I/2os 9s is3 ADDITIONS AND DEDUCTIONS Total Replacement Cost Cost Conversion Factor Adjusted Replacement Cost S Gallons Kind Woad Frame "t ...�.. .Y..r.- .+. t.._ .5 Building Elevators T. Type No. Cap. Passenger #Fioo _ t_ { 5- e n rance.., it 11•413111•1•1101119..! (1) . JAN I TOR 'sAP 7-1 A 17 9 orertee NO. t Of•P'l C. e. Ma Z. El. Tor or 5LA cric" STD RA (O. ) rse. ts1 la 3 0 FRI CC • 114424 °CFI CS MO. 5 ST01'441. (II.S" Ji) !Go oFFI .140• 6 LJ Cis NS HOLW1E5 - JoHNSoNt CuRIC 5ASEME_Wr - . . • r v S.tcr c.iOSzk C4.s � (0 Cet''' -Pi; #1. DV. IS 44_ �.�.��. -- std% �j� vim- •�c.. r,.o lurwr of. away .4- yet,a- 1 Kurt and Gabrielle LeDoux 219 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Kodiak Island Borough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 December 1, 1989 Re: Case 87-058. Request for Planning and Zoning Commission review and findings pursuant to Section 17.57.030 (Off-street parking --Location) "of the Borough Code to: (1) find that it is impractical to locate any of the eight (8) required off-street parking spaces on Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, Block 8, Kodiak Tovvnsite due to the size of the lot and the location of the existing structure on the lot; and (2) to permit the eight (8) required off-street .parking spaces to locate on another lot, within six hundred (600) feet of the structure, which permits the same land use as the required parking is intended to serve. Lots 6A, 6B, and 6C, IBlock 8, Kodiak Townsite; 219 Mill Bay Road (Kurt and Gabrielle LeDoux) Dear Mr. and Ms. LeDoux: Please be advised that the request referenced above has been scheduled for review and action by the Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission at their December 20, 1989 regular meeting. This meeting will begin 'at 7:30 p.m. in the Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska. Attendance at this meeting is recommended. The week prior to the regular meeting, on Wednesday, December 13, 1989, at 7:30 p.m. in the Kodiak Island Borough School District Conference Room, the Commission will hold a worksession to review the packet material for the regular meeting. You are invited to attend this worksession in order to respond to any questions the Commission may have regarding this request. If you have any questions, please call the Community Development Department at 486- 5736, extension 255. Sincerely, 41' Patricia Miley, Secretary Community Development Department KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH.._ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 710 MILL BAY ROAD, ROOM 204, KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340, (907) 466-546 The application fie for all items covered by this loan /a fifty dollars ($60.00), except,aa othwwis. noted. Conditional Use Permits, Exceptions, and Variance applications also require the submission of a.It plan. Applicant Information Property owners name: R. . ( es Wt -z-c 1. s. (tip &oil Property owner's mailing address: l . S inn Z lel te,..„Q 1 City: Ir-pcZkic- State: mac.- Zip: 1961I6^ Home phone: ` ic67- 519-1 Work phone: `480,9 - 32 h &4 ?rop� Oc ilav� If applicable, ids name: (Co v - L.2 c.Q a c. A 1. Agent's mailing address: l L\\ i Ll City: tc,, 6 State: 4-k.. Zip: I94G Home phone: Work phone: Yi Property Information Legal Description: L 4-s 6 0 Lo (Slate l ko . T0143r11k Present use of property: 17r o•Ce- sS) I e s 1' Proposed use of property: Ta pv L _QA6 c,a ss A 5evoe.. ��ra�-car+sRs�..� o-, ,cam, Cac &v. ({-s 1 b4, 6l6 ,,40 6,c, kockki t) L.) s.� � � f'sa4 i--+ D3 (84- 5l-vte4'' Applicant Certification 1, the appikantlauthorizd agent, haw been advised of the procedures involved with this request and have recievd a copy of the appropriate , , o s. Authorized Agent's Signature Date Property Owgnature Date Code Sections) invo STAFF USE ONLY a3o C t -�ut'v�c,ek Conditional .Use Permit Variance X Other (e.g., appearance requests, etc.) non -fee Items Zoning c a e from / Application accepted: ,G -- l Staff signature Exception Title 18 Review 1 to ///g127 Date accepted 5. .h rb Q r C♦ A •