ISLAND LAKE BK 2 LT 18 - RezoneKODIAK
����0����� ISLAND BOROUGH
Telephones 486-5736 - 486- 737 — Box 1246
ALASKA 99615
April 26, 1984
Mr. John Lund
P.O. Box 2872
Kodiak, AK 99615
Dear Mr. Lund:
RE: Island Lake Rezoning Petition
/\t their April 18, 1984 Regular Meeting, the Planning and Zoning
Commission chose not to consider the initiation for rezoning for
Lots 7 through 18, Block 2, Island Lake Subdivision, U.S, Survey 3219.
Reasons for the non-consideration include:
1. There is no present need to rezone;
2. Inappropriate because none of the petitioners own land to
be rezoned;
3. With the extension of water and sewer utilities, some rural
residential land in the area will probably be upgraded; and
4. Although there was public opposition against the initial
hearings to rezone this area to business, the Borough Assembly
did have the opportunity to review the case, and did decide to
go along with the recommendation to rezone the property.
Though the Commission chose not to consider the petition, the Borough
Assembly may initiate the rezonYng. Should you wish to pursue this action,
contact me.
Sincerely,
Bud Cassidy
Assistant Planner/Zoning Officer
Community Bevelopment Department
cc: operty File
Scott Arndt
..g
KODIAK ISLAND BOROuGH
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 19, 1984
TO: Phil Shealy, Borough Manager
FROM: Community Development Departmem
�
u~'
.�
=
RE: Planning and Zoning Action from the April 18, 1984 Meeting
The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular April 18, 1984 regular meeting
considered three items of Assembly concern.
V/
. The Commission received a petition by residents of the Island Lake area
to rezone Lots 7 through 18, Block 2, Island Lake Subdivision from Busi-
ness to Single-Family Residential /Rl\. The Commission chose not to
consider this request. ----
B. A request to rezone Cove Trailer Court from RR1/Business to Business
was denied by the Commission due to:
1. The substandard road leading into the lot;
2. Sufficient vacant Business land in the area'
,
3. The unappropriate use of this site for business property; and
4. The adverse public testimony.
C. The Commission also recommends that Timberline's present sawmill lease site
not be declared surplus to the Borough's needs and the terms of the lease
agreement be adhered to. Findings of fact include:
1. The 1986 lease termination date gives sufficient time to reconsider
sale of the property if it is considered appropriate in the future
or an opportunity for the applicant to look for alternative sites; and
2. Waiting until thelease termination date will also provide the oppor-
tunity for the Monashka Bay Planning Group to develop a Comprehensive
Plan for the entire area.
Should you have additional questions on these or other Commission action, please
contact us.
cmk
KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING - APRIL 18 and 19, 1984
MINUTES
I CALL TO ORDER:
ACTING CHAIRMAN RENNELL called the meeting to order at 7:35
the Borough Assembly Chambers, Kodiak, Alaska.
II ROLL CALL:
Commissioners Present:
Tim Hill
Marlin Knight
Fred Patterson,
Steve Rennell, Acting
Chairman
Commissioners Absent:
Virginia Crowe, excused
Chairman Ken Gregg, excused
Dan James, excused
III APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
Also Present:
p.m. in
Linda Freed, Director
Community Development Department
Bud Cassidy, Assistant Planner
Cathy Kester, Acting Planning Secretary
Ann Moen, Engineering Secretary
COMMISSIONER HILL MOVED TO APPROVE THE AGENDA of April 18, 1984 and
the motion was seconded. The motion CARRIED by unanimous voice vote.
IV MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING:
A) Regular Meeting of March 21, 1984. The following correction was
made under Item IX (A):
GENERAL CONSENSUS of the Commission was that the Commission had no
problem with the request from Timberline, Inc. to lease the land on
Marmot Island.
V APPEARANCE REQUESTS AND AUDIENCE COMMENTS:
A) _Consideratiori-of-a-petition-to rezone Lots 7- 7through_18, Block= 2,
-- Island - Lake- Subdivision,_USS 3219 -from Business: to_ Single- Family
Residential'
ACTING CHAIRMAN RENNELL asked for any audience comments.
SHANNON BACH (Lot 2, Block 3, Island Lake Subdivision), representing
John Lund, Ron Frels, and all residents who signed the petition, read
a statement of support into the record.
MEL STEVENS, speaking on behalf of Scott Arndt, gave opposing testimony
and reminded the Commission of the legal opinion received from the
Borough's attorney, which stated that the petition involved in the
request was not a proper petition that could be used to initiate a
rezoning.
SCOTT ARNDT was present and voiced his opposition to the zoning change
request. Mr. Arndt gave a brief history of previous action taken on
the property. For the past two years Mr. Arndt stated he has had plans
for apartment buildings on the property and had already started the
planning process. Mr. Arndt had obtained appraiser's opinions that
the highest and best use of the property is for multi - family
residential living or business. Mr. Arndt contested the petition to
rezone his property.
LORNA ARNDT, co -owner of 11 lots in the surrounding area, spoke in
opposition to the request.
ART HORS was present and was not opposed to the present Business zoning
of Mr. Arndt's property.
OKEY CHANDLER was present and questioned the lack of park area for
children and suggested that until parks are provided, he would like
to see the property rezoned to Residential.
COMMISSIONER PATTERSON questioned Mr. Arndt on the density of the pro-
posed apartment complex, and Mr. Arndt answered that four of the lots
would have two eight- plexes, and maybe three four- plexes (two bedroom
units) over the next few years. Mr. Arndt had no definite plans for the
entire area.
COMMISSIONER HILL MOVED TO CONSIDER THE PETITION and the motion was
seconded. The question was called and the motion FAILED by unanimous
roll call vote.
THE COMMISSION STATED REASONS FOR NON - CONSIDERATION:
1. there was no present need to rezone;
2. it'would be more appropriate if some of the land was owned
by people who originated the petition;
3. the land could be considered for rezoning in the near future,
along with public land in the Lakeside Subdivision;
4. with the extension of the water and sewer utilities, some rural
residential land in the area will probably be rezoned;
5. although there was public opposition at the public hearing
on the original rezone, the Borough Assembly did have the
opportunity to review the case and decided to go along and
rezone the property from Residential to Business; and
6. as the Assembly did make the decision to rezone the area,
the Commission felt they should not consider the petition at
this time.
B) Proposed Buildings on Lot 24, Block 1, Russian Creek Alaska
Subdivision - Request to be referred to as "Mini- Storage Units"
(David M. Woodruff).
MS. FREED reported that Mr. Woodruff wished to construct the
shop storage building this year, and that he would be on the
May agenda with a request to allow a small motor home on the
property for six months for the project supervisor to live in.
Ms. Freed reported that it was appropriate for the Commission
to find whether this building meets the definition of a "mini -
warehouse," as mini- warehouses are allowed in this district and
warehouses are not.
COMMISSIONER HILL MOVED TO FIND IN FAVOR OF MR. WOODRUFF'S
QUESTION as to whether this is mini - storage or not. The
Commission discussed the appearance request to determine the
intent and proposed usage.
THE MOTION WAS SECONDED and a roll call vote was called. The
motion FAILED with Commissioners Hill and Patterson voting "yes."
ACTING CHAIRMAN RENNELL instructed the Community Development Depart-
ment to inform Mr. Woodruff of the Commission's action so that
Mr. Woodruff would have an opportunity to be scheduled for the
May agenda.
C) Request for Finding Under Section 17.57.030 .(Off- Street Parking- -
Location)(Senior Citizens of Kodiak).
MS. FREED reported an additional handout of a map showing the
portion of the property being leased for parking; she reported
two additional on -site parking spaces that do not show on the map;
plus additional spaces located across the street, for which
approval is being requested with no opposition from the State.
REGULAR MEETING
- 2 - - April 18, 1984
KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH
MEM.O•RA.'NDUM_
ITEM V (A)
DATE: April 11, 1984
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
SUBJ: Information for the April 18, 1984 Regular Meeting
RE:
Petition to Rezone Lots 7 through 18, Block 2,
Island Lake Subdivision - Property Owner. Verification
PROPERTY OWNER VERIFICATION
1. OWNER: Pam Johnson
2. OWNER: Ben Ballenger.
3. OWNER: Ted Rogers
4. OWNER: Mary Rogers
'5. QUESTION
6. OWNER: Martin Eaton
7. OWNER: Linda C. Eaton
8. OWNER: Verna L. Swanson,
9. OWNER: Ilene Erickson
10. OWNER: Carl Erickson
11. OWNER: Nila Treston
12. question Crossed out signature
13. OWNER: Shannon Bach
14. OWNER: Toby Bach'
15. OWNER: Judy Van Fleet
16. OWNER: John R Lund
17. OWNER: Barbara Frels
18. OWNER: Ronald A. Frets
19. OWNER: M. Sweeney
20. OWNER: Brisco
21. OWNER: Jim Brisco, III
22. OWNER: Jennifer Spencer
23. OWNER: N. Szabo
Shahafka Acres, L 1 -1B, B2.
Shahafka Acres; 6A, B1
Shahafka ..Acres,, L .4A, B1
Shahafka Acres, L 4A, B1
Shahafka Acres.., L 3, B1
Shahafka Acres L 3; B1
Shahafka Acres, L , 2 , B1
Shahafka' Acres, L 1B, B1
Shahafka Acres, L 1B, B1
Shahafka Acres, L 1A, B1
Island Lake. Subd..._, L .2, B3
Island Lake Subd., L 2, B3
Island Lake Subd., L 22, B2
Island Lake Subd., L 5 & 6, B2'
Island Lake Subd., L 19 & 20, B2-
Island Lake . :Subd., L_19 & 20, B2
Island lake .Subd., L 5, B1.
Island Lake Subd.,.L 4, B1
Island Lake Subd.; L 4, Bl
Island Lake Subd.; L 2 & 3, B2
USS 3464, L 4
PAGE TWO - Not Numbered
OWNER: Joy Andrew
OWNER: James Obrien
QUESTION ? Susan Thompson.
BLDG ONLY: Stan Thompson
OWNER: Neal Cooper
Miller Point Subd,
Miller Point Subd,
Island Lake Subd.,.
Island Lake Subd.,
1st, L 7, B1
2nd, L 12, B1
L 9, B1
L 12A, B1
5
e
t L Y
2
06
Oq� Y
....*--\::) '► w a
s Vi� A.
56
Z 4tn t4c EST
. ST IEW
1 -� J C; SUD.
`rn
_ X86 18A 7^. 7A 68 E '.
5 2 t
SURD
6 -2
KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH
MEMORANDUM
ITEM V (A)
DATE: April 10, 1984
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Community Development Departme
SUBJ: Information for the April 18, 1984 Regular Meeting
RE: APPEARANCE REQUEST - Petition to Rezone Lots 7 thru 18, Block 2,
Island Lake Subdivision, U.S. Survey 3219, from Business to Single-
Family Residential District (R1).
BACKGROUND:
On March 22, 1984, the Community Development Department received a
petition (attached) signed by property owners in Island Lake Subdivision,
requesting the rezoning of Lots 7 through 18 of Block 2.
After consideration and review of the Borough Code, staff determined
that the petition itself was not enough to initiate a rezoning procedure.
But, the Code does contain provisions (17.72.030B) allowing "the Planning
Commission upon its own motion," to initiate zoning changes. This petition
is being provided for your consideration under this provision of the code.
ZONING HISTORY:
This property was rezoned from Rural Residential to Business after a
lengthy process that started in May, 1980 with the original rezoning request.
After much discussion, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval
of the rezoning to the Assembly, attaching a list of recommended "proposed
uses and buildings" and "uses not wanted" (see attached). After attempts
to "contract" zone the area to limit the uses allowed (in the absense of
provision in the Code for contract zoning), the Assembly finally rezoned
the area to Business in September of 1980.
During the length of this rezoning, the vast majority of the public
testimony received was opposed to the rezoning.
OPTIONS:
The Commission can:
1. Initiate rezoning for Lots 7 thru 18, Block 2, Island Lake Subdivision,
U.S. Survey 3219 upon its own motion; or
2. Acknowledge receipt of the petition, but conclude that there are land
use planning reasons for not initiating rezoning of these lots.
There are some general implications of these options:
1. If the Commission initiates the rezoning, there may be a case for non -
issuance of a building permit for the property in question, until the
rezoning question is settled;
2. If the Commission fails to initiate the rezoning, Section 17.72.030A
permits the Borough Assembly upon its own motion" to do so.
ITEM V (A)
- 2 April 10, 1984
,JAM1N a< E3OLGER
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
POST OFFICE BOX 193
KODIAK, ALASKA 99615
(907) 486-6061
April 9, 1984
Mr. Bud Cassidy,
Assistant Planner/Zoning Officer
Kodiak Island Borough
P.O. Box 1246
Kodiak, Alaska 99615
RE: Island Lake Rezoning
Dear Bud:
This letter is in response to your telephone call and
letter dated March 23, 1984. I understand that a group of
owners of residential property in the Island Lake Subdivision
area have submitted a petition requesting that Lots 7 through
18, Block 2, Island Lake Subdivision be rezoned from B to Rl.
1 am assuming from our conversation and the materials you pre-
sented that the signers of the petition are land owners in the
Island Lake Subdivision area, but that none of the petitioners
own any land within the area for which rezoning is petitioned.
FIRST OUESTION PRESENTED: Does this petition validly
initiate the procedure for a zoning change in this area?
ANSWER: The petition does not validly initiate a zoning
change under the Kodiak Island Borough Code.
ANALYSIS: I generally reviewed the Alaska Statutes which
govern the zoning power of municipalities. None of these sta-
tutes require the consideration of a petition for rezoning
initiated by property owners.
Title 17 of the Kodiak Island Borough Code contains the
Borough's zoning provisions. KIBC 17.72.030 provides as fol-
lows:
17.72.030. Manner of Initiation. Changes in this
title may be initiated in the following manner:
A. The Borough Assembly upon its own motion; B.
- The Planning Commission upon its own motion; C. By
petition of one or more owners of property within
Letter
TO: Mr. Bud Cassidy
DATE: April 9, 1984
Page 2
an area proposed to be rezoned. A petition shall
be in the form of an application for a change in
the boundary of a district, shall be filed in the
Community Development Office, be accompanied by
the required fee and such data and information as
may be necessary to assure the fullest practical
presentation of facts and shall set forth reasons
and justification for proposing such change.
The plain meaning of the language used in this code pro-
vision requires the petition to be made by the owners of pro-
perty.within the area for which rezoning is proposed. Since
none of the petitioners in the present case are owners of
property within the area proposed to be rezoned, the petition
does not validly initiate a zoning change.
The intent of this code provision is also clear from a
comparison with other provisions. KIBC 17.72.080 was passed
in the same ordinance as KIBC 17.72.030, ordinance number 83-
58-0 Sec. 1 (1983). KIBC 17.72.080 provides:
17.72.080. Boundary Change-Protest. In case
of a protest against a change in zoning district
classification signed by the owners of 20% or
more either of the area of the lots included in
such proposed change or of the area of the lots
immediately abutting the area included in such
proposed change or separated therefrom only by
an alley or street, such amendments shall not
become effective except by the favorable vote
of all members of the Borough Assembly.
It is clear from a comparison of these sections that the
Borough Assembly was well aware of a clear way to designate
the rights of abutting property owners. A failure to include
a similar phrase in KIBC 17.72.030.0 is strong evidence that
the Assembly intended to apply the petition right only to land
owners whose property is actually within the area proposed to
be rezoned.
SECOND QUESTION PRESENTED: Can a building permit be
issued to the owner of the business property during the period
after a rezoning request is initiated?
ANSWER: A building permit can be issued to the owner of
the business property if the property complies with zoning
requirements and is otherwise legally entitled to a permit.
The Borough is not required to issue a permit, however, if a
Letter
TO: Mr. Bud Cassidy
DATE: April 9, 1984
Page 3
zoning amendment is pending.
ANALYSIS: KIBC 15.28.020 requires compliance with zoning
requirements prior to the issuance of a building permit. Any
building permit which is issued in conflict with the zoning
provisions is null and void. KIBC 17.03.060.C.
Generally when a permit is validly granted by an officer
which is authorized to issue it under applicable zoning and
building provisions and the permitee has acted in reliance on
the permit, the right to continue construction under the per-
mit may become a vested right which the municipality has no
power to revoke. 2 Yokley, Zoning Law and Practice, Section
14-5, 14-8 (4th Ed. 1978). On the other hand, as set forth in
the Borough ordinance cited above, a permitee acquires no •
vested rights where the permit is issued in violation of zon-
ing ordinances. 2 Yokley, Sec. 14-6.
There is a. split in authority regarding the right to a
building permit during the period when a zoning amendment is
pending. The majority of cases hold that the municipality may
refuse to issue a building permit during the period when a
zoning amendment is pending as long as the municipality does
not unreasonably or arbitrarily refuse or delay the issuance
of the permit. McQuillin, Municipal Corporations, Sec. 25.155
(revised edition 1983). A minority line of cases require
favorable action on a building permit if the applicant is in •
conformity to the zoning ordinances in effect at the time of
the application.
I am not aware of any authority which requires the
issuance of a building permit to be delayed during the period
when a zoning amendment is pending. On the other hand, mY
advice would have to be, based on the majority line of
decisions noted above, that the Borough has the power to delay
the issuance. of a building permit during the pendency of a re-
zoning amendment.
It should be noted that the power of the Borough to delay
the issuance of a building permit is clearly restricted to the
time period when a rezoning amendment is "pending". For this
reason, the developer described in your letter is probably en-
titled to a building permit if he is in conformity with the
provisions of the Borough Code unless a change in zoning is
initiated by the Borough Assmebly, the Planning Commission, or
a proper petition of an owner of property within the area pro-
posed to be rezoned.
Letter
TO: Mr. Bud Cassidy
DATE: April 9, 1984
Page 4
Thank you for this interesting question. Feel free to
write or call if you have any questions.
Sincerely yours,
oel H. Bolger
Attorney
JHB/vkb'
KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH
Telephones 486 -5736 - 486 -5737 — Box 1246
KODIAK, ALASKA 99615
March 23, 1984.
Mr. Joel Bolger
Jamin and Bolger
P.O. Box 193
Kodiak, AK 99615
Dear Joel:
RE: Case 84-033. Request to rezone Lots 7 through 18, Block 2,
Island Lake Subdivision; U.S. Survey 3219.
The Community Development Department has received a petition from
homeowners in the Island Lake Area to rezone Business -zoned property to
Single - Family Residential (R1). A copy of the petition and area map
are enclosed.
Section 17.72.030(C), Manner of Initiation, states that a change
in existing zoning can be initiated "by petition of one or more owners
of property within an area proposed to be rezoned."
Interpretation of this statement is not clear and has tremendous
bearing on the request. Does this section refer to owners of the
specific parcel -to be rezoned, or to landowners in the general Island
Lake Area?
Signatures on the petition are from owners of residential property
and not the owner of the specific business parcel.
A related matter-is the issuance of a building permit. Can this
request for rezoning, assuming it is valid, prevent a building permit
from being issued if the developer seeks one?
In summary, the major questions of concern are:
1. Is the manner of initiation valid under existing borough
code?
2. Can a building permit be issued totthe owner of the
business property when and if this request makes its way
through the Planning and Zoning Commission and the
Borough Assembly?
The background of this case is being researched by our department.
Please call if additional information is required, as a timely response
is requested.
Sincerely,
• Bud Cassidy
Assittant'Planner/Zoning Officer
.Community Development Department
cc: Case,84-033..
jig
. Enclosures
Joel Bolger
2 - March 23, 1984.
TRACT "A "
LOT IA
V CREST LA
a
TRACT
4100 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH
•OST OFFICE BOX 1246
'KODIAK, ALASKA 99615
•
( ) Conditional Use Permit
( ) Exception
( ) Variance
(V) Zoning Change: Fro . Tri).2N\
CODE SECTION INVOLVED: 16717:2, eAlnfr §
NOTE: The application fee for all items covered by this form is $50.
Conditional Use Permits, Exceptions, and Variance Applications also require
the submission of a site plan.
APPLICANT:
Name
Address
\(-C.....c\Q— •
City, State, Zip V%%S\c
PROPERTY:--N
Lot Block
United States Survey #
PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY:
Home Telephone
Work Telephone
Subdivision Name
Section, Township, Range, S.M.
PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY:
I have been advised of the procedures involved with this request and have
received a copy-of the appropriate regulations.
,-17+...71§1:11AL
Authorized Agent - Date
Date Application Accepted: BY
Property Owner
Date
CASH RECEIPT
Kodiak Island Borough
700 UPPER MILL BAY ROAD
P.O. BOX 1246
KODIAK, ALASKA 99615
PHONE (907) 486 -5736
21 2
RECEIVED .
FROM •
DATE .319 C -'
fUND: CITE _z�..:;...�,,.. $.�..a�.....
010 = 000 - 101 -10 -00
-..z �� ITEM?._�s_•,.._ -.,..,...'..
CASH
,_:.:.,DEBIT v
I .��'IL %C
I I
r �, CREDIT''z
{�`��''3'_
I I
010 - 000 322 - 11 - 00
BUILDING PERMITS
010 - 000 - 322 -90 -00
ZONING PERMITS
1 I
010 - 000 -341 -50 -00
SALE OF MAPS
1 I
I 1
010 - 000 - 341 - 51 - 00
SALE OF COPIES
I I
I '-
PROPERTY TAX
I I
I I
LAND SALE PAYMENT
I I
PER ATTACHED
I 1
I I
(j (500 -.3, -/ 7 -&
2/ %/7(/?(CM-77 (
1 I •
1 50 CA
./4
✓
I I
1 I
I I
I
--
1 I
1 1
1. 1
1 I
CONDITIONS OF CHECK PAYMENTS T ®TAL ›N------
oe vMFNT[ TFNnFPFD RY CHFCK FOR OBLIGATIONS DUE TO
(7()
y 1
c
I `/ � , ^l
f�'
THE BOROUGH ARE SATISFIED ONLY UPON THE CHECK BEING
HONORED. RETURNED CHECKS FOR ANY_REASON RESTORES THE,OBLIGATION AS
UNPAID AND SUBJECTS THE PAYER TO ANY CHARGES, FEES OR OTHER LEGAL
LIABILITIES AS MAY BE APPLICABLE.
CASHIER
OS
PAYMENT MADE BY:
HECK NO.
CASH
OTHER
FMO8- 511815
4-S 00111Vt— =s1 e‘f1/4-“:
c-)kck sk 0\ou..) 1,6*.s 7- (3 )
ctt \ • Sciro. (cl/
("•.01(n._ R . _
cg6 qq/2—
Iv-
0'7
3/0E ni e,?0 no-7k
,\
4q-
re
`.F. X12-
0:Q7 9 S4
r
/S5c--
ZP
CI-DC 9' S fiQ
-a\
vevno
no's .S
07011Q
KODIAK ISLAND BOROutik1
MEMORANDUW
DATE: March 23, 1484
TO: All Concerned Parties
FROM: Community Development Department
SUBJ: Information for the April 18, 1984 ^egula Meeting
of the Planning and Zoning Commission
RE: DRAFT AGENDA
Attached please find the draft agenda for the April 18, 1984
Regular Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission'
This agenda, including all subdivision cases, will be
published in the Kodiak Daily Mirror on April 11 and 18, 1984.
It will also be published in the Kadiak Times on April 13, 1984,
DISTRIBUTION LIST:
Nancy & William Missal
Deborah & Robert 8urgy
Barbara & 8ill SwoarinqYn
Cathy Cordry
Peter Bollenbacher
Ilva Murbach Fox
Shawn Dillon
Mr. Dan Ogg
Ms. Pat Lods
If you require any additional information on any zoning case,
please contact the Community Development Department at 486-5736,
extension 258'
'-g
-'
DATE: APRIL 18, I984
Planning and ZonIng Commission Agenda
1. CASE 84-019' Request to rezone Lot 1, Block 6, U.S. Survey 3066 A&B and
U.S. Survey 2739 (Cove Trailer Court) from RR1 District to
Business District in accordance with Section 17.72 (Amendments
and Changes)(Wllliam A. Bardot).
2. CASE 84-020. Request to purchase 15 acres of presently leased Borough real
property in accordance with Chapter 18'30 (Sale of Borough Land).
This property is a portion of ADL 44355, Monashka Bay Drive
(Timberline, Inc.).
CASE 84-021. Request for a variance from Section 17.18'050 (Yards) and
Section 17'40'010 (Projections into Required Yards) to allow
construction of additions onto the front and side of the existing
structure on Lot 6A, Block 54, East Addition. This property is
physically located at 1713 Rezanof Drive (Michael C. 8rochan),
4. CASE 84-023' Request for a variance from Section 17'60'030 (Residential Districts)
to permit an illuminated sign in a multi-family residential district.
This property is located on Lot 198, Block 5, Erskine Subdivision;
411 Rezanof Drive (Travel Center, Inc.).
5. CASE 84-024, Request for a variance from Section 17.19.040 (Yards) to allow the
construction of an attached garage into the required front yard
setback. This property is located on Lot 1, Block 7, Aleutian
Homes Subdivision; 416 Thorsheim Street (Donald Keegan).
6. CASE 84-025 Request for variance from Section 17'13'050 (Yards) to permit the
construction of three single-family dwellings on one lot. This
property is located in Section 10, Township 23 South, Range 19 West,
Serward Meridian (Kitoi Bay Hatchery)(Alaska Department of Trans-
portation/Public Facilities).
CASE 84-026. Request to rezone Lots 21 through 24 and Lots 6 through 9,
U.S, Survey 3099 from Rural Residential (RR1) to Multi-family
Residential (R3) in accordance with Chapter 17.72 (Amendments and
Changes). The property is generally located on Mission Road,
near Jackson's Mobile Home Park (representative property owners).
' CASE 86-027 Request for variances from Sections 17'57'020 (Off-Street Parking--
Number of Spaces Required) and 17'57'030 (Off-Street Parking--
Location) to permit the expansion of a business structure and to
provide parking on Lots 2 through 7, Block 3, New Kodiak Subdivision,
207 8helikuf Avenue (N.C. Sutliff & Sons, Inc.).
9. CASE 84-030' Request for a variance from Section 17'18'050/C\, Yards, to permit
the construction of a home addition that encroaches into the required
rear lot setback on Lot 12, Block 50, East Addition Subdivision. This
property is located at 1.511 Rezanof Drive (David and Karla Harville).
DRAFT AGENDA
- 1 - March 23, 1984
DRAFT AGENDA
- 2 - March 23, 1984
�.�
10. CASE 84-0 Request for variances from Sections 17.57'020 (Off-street Parking--
Number of Spaces Required) and Section 17'57'040 (Parking Area
Development Standards) to permit construction of an auditorium.
Lot 4, U.S. Survey 2538B (Kodiak Island Borough),
11. CASE 84-032. Request for a variance from Section 17'57'020 (Off-Street Parking--
Number of Spaces Required) to provide less parking than required
on Lot 8, Block 3, New Kodiak Subdivision; 218 Shel|kofAvonue
(Ernest H. Mills)'
12. CASE 84-D33.' Request to rezone Lots 7 through 18, Block 2, Island Lake Subd.,
U.S, Survey 3219, from Business (B) to Single-Family Residential (K1)
in accordance with Chapter 17.72 (Amendments and Changes\. This
area is bordered by Island Lake Road, Ptarmigan Pass, Kittiwake St.,
and Arctic Tern (Residents of Island Lake Community).
13, CASE 84-034' Request for a variance from Section 17'57,020 (Off-Street Parking--
Number of Spaces Required) to provide less parking spaces than
required on Tract 81, U.S. Survey 1682. This property is generally
located at Rezanof and Woodland Drive (Assembly of God Church).
14. CASE 84-035. Request to Rezone Portions of U.S. Surveys 3099, 3100, and 3181
from Rural Residential District (RR1) to Two-Family Residential
District (R2). This property is located on Mission Road, from
-Jackson's Trailer Court to the and of U.S. Survey 3101 (Community
Development Department).
15. CASE 84-036. Request for variances from Sections 17.20.030/B\, Lot Width, and
17.20.040(B)^ Side Yards, to allow a zero-lot-line dwelling on
Lot 8, Block 1, Russell Estates, First Addition; 1215 Sel\ef Lane
(Eugene Mueller).
NOTE: This draft agenda may not include any of the subdivision cases that the
Commission will hear at the April 18, 1984 Regular Meeting. if you require any
additional information on any zoning case, please call the Kodiak Island Borough,
Community Development Department at:
486-5736 extension 255 or 258