Loading...
LAKESIDE 2ND LT 1C - RezoneKODIAK ����0����� ISLAND BOROUGH Telephones 486-5736 - 486- 737 — Box 1246 ALASKA 99615 April 26, 1984 Mr. John Lund P.O. Box 2872 Kodiak, AK 99615 Dear Mr. Lund: RE: Island Lake Rezoning Petition /\t their April 18, 1984 Regular Meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission chose not to consider the initiation for rezoning for Lots 7 through 18, Block 2, Island Lake Subdivision, U.S, Survey 3219. Reasons for the non-consideration include: 1. There is no present need to rezone; 2. Inappropriate because none of the petitioners own land to be rezoned; 3. With the extension of water and sewer utilities, some rural residential land in the area will probably be upgraded; and 4. Although there was public opposition against the initial hearings to rezone this area to business, the Borough Assembly did have the opportunity to review the case, and did decide to go along with the recommendation to rezone the property. Though the Commission chose not to consider the petition, the Borough Assembly may initiate the rezonYng. Should you wish to pursue this action, contact me. Sincerely, Bud Cassidy Assistant Planner/Zoning Officer Community Bevelopment Department cc: operty File Scott Arndt ..g KODIAK ISLAND BOROuGH MEMORANDUM DATE: April 19, 1984 TO: Phil Shealy, Borough Manager FROM: Community Development Departmem � u~' .� = RE: Planning and Zoning Action from the April 18, 1984 Meeting The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular April 18, 1984 regular meeting considered three items of Assembly concern. V/ . The Commission received a petition by residents of the Island Lake area to rezone Lots 7 through 18, Block 2, Island Lake Subdivision from Busi- ness to Single-Family Residential /Rl\. The Commission chose not to consider this request. ---- B. A request to rezone Cove Trailer Court from RR1/Business to Business was denied by the Commission due to: 1. The substandard road leading into the lot; 2. Sufficient vacant Business land in the area' , 3. The unappropriate use of this site for business property; and 4. The adverse public testimony. C. The Commission also recommends that Timberline's present sawmill lease site not be declared surplus to the Borough's needs and the terms of the lease agreement be adhered to. Findings of fact include: 1. The 1986 lease termination date gives sufficient time to reconsider sale of the property if it is considered appropriate in the future or an opportunity for the applicant to look for alternative sites; and 2. Waiting until thelease termination date will also provide the oppor- tunity for the Monashka Bay Planning Group to develop a Comprehensive Plan for the entire area. Should you have additional questions on these or other Commission action, please contact us. cmk KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING - APRIL 18 and 19, 1984 MINUTES I CALL TO ORDER: ACTING CHAIRMAN RENNELL called the meeting to order at 7:35 the Borough Assembly Chambers, Kodiak, Alaska. II ROLL CALL: Commissioners Present: Tim Hill Marlin Knight Fred Patterson, Steve Rennell, Acting Chairman Commissioners Absent: Virginia Crowe, excused Chairman Ken Gregg, excused Dan James, excused III APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Also Present: p.m. in Linda Freed, Director Community Development Department Bud Cassidy, Assistant Planner Cathy Kester, Acting Planning Secretary Ann Moen, Engineering Secretary COMMISSIONER HILL MOVED TO APPROVE THE AGENDA of April 18, 1984 and the motion was seconded. The motion CARRIED by unanimous voice vote. IV MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING: A) Regular Meeting of March 21, 1984. The following correction was made under Item IX (A): GENERAL CONSENSUS of the Commission was that the Commission had no problem with the request from Timberline, Inc. to lease the land on Marmot Island. V APPEARANCE REQUESTS AND AUDIENCE COMMENTS: A) _Consideratiori-of-a-petition-to rezone Lots 7- 7through_18, Block= 2, -- Island - Lake- Subdivision,_USS 3219 -from Business: to_ Single- Family Residential' ACTING CHAIRMAN RENNELL asked for any audience comments. SHANNON BACH (Lot 2, Block 3, Island Lake Subdivision), representing John Lund, Ron Frels, and all residents who signed the petition, read a statement of support into the record. MEL STEVENS, speaking on behalf of Scott Arndt, gave opposing testimony and reminded the Commission of the legal opinion received from the Borough's attorney, which stated that the petition involved in the request was not a proper petition that could be used to initiate a rezoning. SCOTT ARNDT was present and voiced his opposition to the zoning change request. Mr. Arndt gave a brief history of previous action taken on the property. For the past two years Mr. Arndt stated he has had plans for apartment buildings on the property and had already started the planning process. Mr. Arndt had obtained appraiser's opinions that the highest and best use of the property is for multi - family residential living or business. Mr. Arndt contested the petition to rezone his property. LORNA ARNDT, co -owner of 11 lots in the surrounding area, spoke in opposition to the request. ART HORS was present and was not opposed to the present Business zoning of Mr. Arndt's property. OKEY CHANDLER was present and questioned the lack of park area for children and suggested that until parks are provided, he would like to see the property rezoned to Residential. COMMISSIONER PATTERSON questioned Mr. Arndt on the density of the pro- posed apartment complex, and Mr. Arndt answered that four of the lots would have two eight- plexes, and maybe three four- plexes (two bedroom units) over the next few years. Mr. Arndt had no definite plans for the entire area. COMMISSIONER HILL MOVED TO CONSIDER THE PETITION and the motion was seconded. The question was called and the motion FAILED by unanimous roll call vote. THE COMMISSION STATED REASONS FOR NON - CONSIDERATION: 1. there was no present need to rezone; 2. it'would be more appropriate if some of the land was owned by people who originated the petition; 3. the land could be considered for rezoning in the near future, along with public land in the Lakeside Subdivision; 4. with the extension of the water and sewer utilities, some rural residential land in the area will probably be rezoned; 5. although there was public opposition at the public hearing on the original rezone, the Borough Assembly did have the opportunity to review the case and decided to go along and rezone the property from Residential to Business; and 6. as the Assembly did make the decision to rezone the area, the Commission felt they should not consider the petition at this time. B) Proposed Buildings on Lot 24, Block 1, Russian Creek Alaska Subdivision - Request to be referred to as "Mini- Storage Units" (David M. Woodruff). MS. FREED reported that Mr. Woodruff wished to construct the shop storage building this year, and that he would be on the May agenda with a request to allow a small motor home on the property for six months for the project supervisor to live in. Ms. Freed reported that it was appropriate for the Commission to find whether this building meets the definition of a "mini - warehouse," as mini- warehouses are allowed in this district and warehouses are not. COMMISSIONER HILL MOVED TO FIND IN FAVOR OF MR. WOODRUFF'S QUESTION as to whether this is mini - storage or not. The Commission discussed the appearance request to determine the intent and proposed usage. THE MOTION WAS SECONDED and a roll call vote was called. The motion FAILED with Commissioners Hill and Patterson voting "yes." ACTING CHAIRMAN RENNELL instructed the Community Development Depart- ment to inform Mr. Woodruff of the Commission's action so that Mr. Woodruff would have an opportunity to be scheduled for the May agenda. C) Request for Finding Under Section 17.57.030 .(Off- Street Parking- - Location)(Senior Citizens of Kodiak). MS. FREED reported an additional handout of a map showing the portion of the property being leased for parking; she reported two additional on -site parking spaces that do not show on the map; plus additional spaces located across the street, for which approval is being requested with no opposition from the State. REGULAR MEETING - 2 - - April 18, 1984 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH MEM.O•RA.'NDUM_ ITEM V (A) DATE: April 11, 1984 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Community Development Department SUBJ: Information for the April 18, 1984 Regular Meeting RE: Petition to Rezone Lots 7 through 18, Block 2, Island Lake Subdivision - Property Owner. Verification PROPERTY OWNER VERIFICATION 1. OWNER: Pam Johnson 2. OWNER: Ben Ballenger. 3. OWNER: Ted Rogers 4. OWNER: Mary Rogers '5. QUESTION 6. OWNER: Martin Eaton 7. OWNER: Linda C. Eaton 8. OWNER: Verna L. Swanson, 9. OWNER: Ilene Erickson 10. OWNER: Carl Erickson 11. OWNER: Nila Treston 12. question Crossed out signature 13. OWNER: Shannon Bach 14. OWNER: Toby Bach' 15. OWNER: Judy Van Fleet 16. OWNER: John R Lund 17. OWNER: Barbara Frels 18. OWNER: Ronald A. Frets 19. OWNER: M. Sweeney 20. OWNER: Brisco 21. OWNER: Jim Brisco, III 22. OWNER: Jennifer Spencer 23. OWNER: N. Szabo Shahafka Acres, L 1 -1B, B2. Shahafka Acres; 6A, B1 Shahafka ..Acres,, L .4A, B1 Shahafka Acres, L 4A, B1 Shahafka Acres.., L 3, B1 Shahafka Acres L 3; B1 Shahafka Acres, L , 2 , B1 Shahafka' Acres, L 1B, B1 Shahafka Acres, L 1B, B1 Shahafka Acres, L 1A, B1 Island Lake. Subd..._, L .2, B3 Island Lake Subd., L 2, B3 Island Lake Subd., L 22, B2 Island Lake Subd., L 5 & 6, B2' Island Lake Subd., L 19 & 20, B2- Island Lake . :Subd., L_19 & 20, B2 Island lake .Subd., L 5, B1. Island Lake Subd.,.L 4, B1 Island Lake Subd.; L 4, Bl Island Lake Subd.; L 2 & 3, B2 USS 3464, L 4 PAGE TWO - Not Numbered OWNER: Joy Andrew OWNER: James Obrien QUESTION ? Susan Thompson. BLDG ONLY: Stan Thompson OWNER: Neal Cooper Miller Point Subd, Miller Point Subd, Island Lake Subd.,. Island Lake Subd., 1st, L 7, B1 2nd, L 12, B1 L 9, B1 L 12A, B1 5 e t L Y 2 06 Oq� Y ....*--\::) '► w a s Vi� A. 56 Z 4tn t4c EST . ST IEW 1 -� J C; SUD. `rn _ X86 18A 7^. 7A 68 E '. 5 2 t SURD 6 -2 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH MEMORANDUM ITEM V (A) DATE: April 10, 1984 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Community Development Departme SUBJ: Information for the April 18, 1984 Regular Meeting RE: APPEARANCE REQUEST - Petition to Rezone Lots 7 thru 18, Block 2, Island Lake Subdivision, U.S. Survey 3219, from Business to Single- Family Residential District (R1). BACKGROUND: On March 22, 1984, the Community Development Department received a petition (attached) signed by property owners in Island Lake Subdivision, requesting the rezoning of Lots 7 through 18 of Block 2. After consideration and review of the Borough Code, staff determined that the petition itself was not enough to initiate a rezoning procedure. But, the Code does contain provisions (17.72.030B) allowing "the Planning Commission upon its own motion," to initiate zoning changes. This petition is being provided for your consideration under this provision of the code. ZONING HISTORY: This property was rezoned from Rural Residential to Business after a lengthy process that started in May, 1980 with the original rezoning request. After much discussion, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the rezoning to the Assembly, attaching a list of recommended "proposed uses and buildings" and "uses not wanted" (see attached). After attempts to "contract" zone the area to limit the uses allowed (in the absense of provision in the Code for contract zoning), the Assembly finally rezoned the area to Business in September of 1980. During the length of this rezoning, the vast majority of the public testimony received was opposed to the rezoning. OPTIONS: The Commission can: 1. Initiate rezoning for Lots 7 thru 18, Block 2, Island Lake Subdivision, U.S. Survey 3219 upon its own motion; or 2. Acknowledge receipt of the petition, but conclude that there are land use planning reasons for not initiating rezoning of these lots. There are some general implications of these options: 1. If the Commission initiates the rezoning, there may be a case for non - issuance of a building permit for the property in question, until the rezoning question is settled; 2. If the Commission fails to initiate the rezoning, Section 17.72.030A permits the Borough Assembly upon its own motion" to do so. ITEM V (A) - 2 April 10, 1984 ,JAM1N a< E3OLGER ATTORNEYS AT LAW POST OFFICE BOX 193 KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 (907) 486-6061 April 9, 1984 Mr. Bud Cassidy, Assistant Planner/Zoning Officer Kodiak Island Borough P.O. Box 1246 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 RE: Island Lake Rezoning Dear Bud: This letter is in response to your telephone call and letter dated March 23, 1984. I understand that a group of owners of residential property in the Island Lake Subdivision area have submitted a petition requesting that Lots 7 through 18, Block 2, Island Lake Subdivision be rezoned from B to Rl. 1 am assuming from our conversation and the materials you pre- sented that the signers of the petition are land owners in the Island Lake Subdivision area, but that none of the petitioners own any land within the area for which rezoning is petitioned. FIRST OUESTION PRESENTED: Does this petition validly initiate the procedure for a zoning change in this area? ANSWER: The petition does not validly initiate a zoning change under the Kodiak Island Borough Code. ANALYSIS: I generally reviewed the Alaska Statutes which govern the zoning power of municipalities. None of these sta- tutes require the consideration of a petition for rezoning initiated by property owners. Title 17 of the Kodiak Island Borough Code contains the Borough's zoning provisions. KIBC 17.72.030 provides as fol- lows: 17.72.030. Manner of Initiation. Changes in this title may be initiated in the following manner: A. The Borough Assembly upon its own motion; B. - The Planning Commission upon its own motion; C. By petition of one or more owners of property within Letter TO: Mr. Bud Cassidy DATE: April 9, 1984 Page 2 an area proposed to be rezoned. A petition shall be in the form of an application for a change in the boundary of a district, shall be filed in the Community Development Office, be accompanied by the required fee and such data and information as may be necessary to assure the fullest practical presentation of facts and shall set forth reasons and justification for proposing such change. The plain meaning of the language used in this code pro- vision requires the petition to be made by the owners of pro- perty.within the area for which rezoning is proposed. Since none of the petitioners in the present case are owners of property within the area proposed to be rezoned, the petition does not validly initiate a zoning change. The intent of this code provision is also clear from a comparison with other provisions. KIBC 17.72.080 was passed in the same ordinance as KIBC 17.72.030, ordinance number 83- 58-0 Sec. 1 (1983). KIBC 17.72.080 provides: 17.72.080. Boundary Change-Protest. In case of a protest against a change in zoning district classification signed by the owners of 20% or more either of the area of the lots included in such proposed change or of the area of the lots immediately abutting the area included in such proposed change or separated therefrom only by an alley or street, such amendments shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of all members of the Borough Assembly. It is clear from a comparison of these sections that the Borough Assembly was well aware of a clear way to designate the rights of abutting property owners. A failure to include a similar phrase in KIBC 17.72.030.0 is strong evidence that the Assembly intended to apply the petition right only to land owners whose property is actually within the area proposed to be rezoned. SECOND QUESTION PRESENTED: Can a building permit be issued to the owner of the business property during the period after a rezoning request is initiated? ANSWER: A building permit can be issued to the owner of the business property if the property complies with zoning requirements and is otherwise legally entitled to a permit. The Borough is not required to issue a permit, however, if a Letter TO: Mr. Bud Cassidy DATE: April 9, 1984 Page 3 zoning amendment is pending. ANALYSIS: KIBC 15.28.020 requires compliance with zoning requirements prior to the issuance of a building permit. Any building permit which is issued in conflict with the zoning provisions is null and void. KIBC 17.03.060.C. Generally when a permit is validly granted by an officer which is authorized to issue it under applicable zoning and building provisions and the permitee has acted in reliance on the permit, the right to continue construction under the per- mit may become a vested right which the municipality has no power to revoke. 2 Yokley, Zoning Law and Practice, Section 14-5, 14-8 (4th Ed. 1978). On the other hand, as set forth in the Borough ordinance cited above, a permitee acquires no • vested rights where the permit is issued in violation of zon- ing ordinances. 2 Yokley, Sec. 14-6. There is a. split in authority regarding the right to a building permit during the period when a zoning amendment is pending. The majority of cases hold that the municipality may refuse to issue a building permit during the period when a zoning amendment is pending as long as the municipality does not unreasonably or arbitrarily refuse or delay the issuance of the permit. McQuillin, Municipal Corporations, Sec. 25.155 (revised edition 1983). A minority line of cases require favorable action on a building permit if the applicant is in • conformity to the zoning ordinances in effect at the time of the application. I am not aware of any authority which requires the issuance of a building permit to be delayed during the period when a zoning amendment is pending. On the other hand, mY advice would have to be, based on the majority line of decisions noted above, that the Borough has the power to delay the issuance. of a building permit during the pendency of a re- zoning amendment. It should be noted that the power of the Borough to delay the issuance of a building permit is clearly restricted to the time period when a rezoning amendment is "pending". For this reason, the developer described in your letter is probably en- titled to a building permit if he is in conformity with the provisions of the Borough Code unless a change in zoning is initiated by the Borough Assmebly, the Planning Commission, or a proper petition of an owner of property within the area pro- posed to be rezoned. Letter TO: Mr. Bud Cassidy DATE: April 9, 1984 Page 4 Thank you for this interesting question. Feel free to write or call if you have any questions. Sincerely yours, oel H. Bolger Attorney JHB/vkb' KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH Telephones 486 -5736 - 486 -5737 — Box 1246 KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 March 23, 1984. Mr. Joel Bolger Jamin and Bolger P.O. Box 193 Kodiak, AK 99615 Dear Joel: RE: Case 84-033. Request to rezone Lots 7 through 18, Block 2, Island Lake Subdivision; U.S. Survey 3219. The Community Development Department has received a petition from homeowners in the Island Lake Area to rezone Business -zoned property to Single - Family Residential (R1). A copy of the petition and area map are enclosed. Section 17.72.030(C), Manner of Initiation, states that a change in existing zoning can be initiated "by petition of one or more owners of property within an area proposed to be rezoned." Interpretation of this statement is not clear and has tremendous bearing on the request. Does this section refer to owners of the specific parcel -to be rezoned, or to landowners in the general Island Lake Area? Signatures on the petition are from owners of residential property and not the owner of the specific business parcel. A related matter-is the issuance of a building permit. Can this request for rezoning, assuming it is valid, prevent a building permit from being issued if the developer seeks one? In summary, the major questions of concern are: 1. Is the manner of initiation valid under existing borough code? 2. Can a building permit be issued totthe owner of the business property when and if this request makes its way through the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Borough Assembly? The background of this case is being researched by our department. Please call if additional information is required, as a timely response is requested. Sincerely, • Bud Cassidy Assittant'Planner/Zoning Officer .Community Development Department cc: Case,84-033.. jig . Enclosures Joel Bolger 2 - March 23, 1984. TRACT "A " LOT IA V CREST LA a TRACT 4100 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH •OST OFFICE BOX 1246 'KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 • ( ) Conditional Use Permit ( ) Exception ( ) Variance (V) Zoning Change: Fro . Tri).2N\ CODE SECTION INVOLVED: 16717:2, eAlnfr § NOTE: The application fee for all items covered by this form is $50. Conditional Use Permits, Exceptions, and Variance Applications also require the submission of a site plan. APPLICANT: Name Address \(-C.....c\Q— • City, State, Zip V%%S\c PROPERTY:--N Lot Block United States Survey # PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY: Home Telephone Work Telephone Subdivision Name Section, Township, Range, S.M. PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY: I have been advised of the procedures involved with this request and have received a copy-of the appropriate regulations. ,-17+...71§1:11AL Authorized Agent - Date Date Application Accepted: BY Property Owner Date CASH RECEIPT Kodiak Island Borough 700 UPPER MILL BAY ROAD P.O. BOX 1246 KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 PHONE (907) 486 -5736 21 2 RECEIVED . FROM • DATE .319 C -' fUND: CITE _z�..:;...�,,.. $.�..a�..... 010 = 000 - 101 -10 -00 -..z �� ITEM?._�s_•,.._ -.,..,...'.. CASH ,_:.:.,DEBIT v I .��'IL %C I I r �, CREDIT''z {�`��''3'_ I I 010 - 000 322 - 11 - 00 BUILDING PERMITS 010 - 000 - 322 -90 -00 ZONING PERMITS 1 I 010 - 000 -341 -50 -00 SALE OF MAPS 1 I I 1 010 - 000 - 341 - 51 - 00 SALE OF COPIES I I I '- PROPERTY TAX I I I I LAND SALE PAYMENT I I PER ATTACHED I 1 I I (j (500 -.3, -/ 7 -& 2/ %/7(/?(CM-77 ( 1 I • 1 50 CA ./4 ✓ I I 1 I I I I -- 1 I 1 1 1. 1 1 I CONDITIONS OF CHECK PAYMENTS T ®TAL ›N------ oe vMFNT[ TFNnFPFD RY CHFCK FOR OBLIGATIONS DUE TO (7() y 1 c I `/ � , ^l f�' THE BOROUGH ARE SATISFIED ONLY UPON THE CHECK BEING HONORED. RETURNED CHECKS FOR ANY_REASON RESTORES THE,OBLIGATION AS UNPAID AND SUBJECTS THE PAYER TO ANY CHARGES, FEES OR OTHER LEGAL LIABILITIES AS MAY BE APPLICABLE. CASHIER OS PAYMENT MADE BY: HECK NO. CASH OTHER FMO8- 511815 4-S 00111Vt— =s1 e‘f1/4-“: c-)kck sk 0\ou..) 1,6*.s 7- (3 ) ctt \ • Sciro. (cl/ ("•.01(n._ R . _ cg6 qq/2— Iv- See v.d4 s 7-1$ Blocks') Sia -5a L9 r-er. zo e ero rv�, ' naN.e 546 - 3377 33 °_ ...eL©c_G<- sraGi- 5-6'6 6zb-.,, a - 446-576,96, ..d 4 f6e. 30/6 A_- >_ 9-8 Csa- : 301.5_ KODIAK ISLAND BOROutik1 MEMORANDUW DATE: March 23, 1484 TO: All Concerned Parties FROM: Community Development Department SUBJ: Information for the April 18, 1984 ^egula Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission RE: DRAFT AGENDA Attached please find the draft agenda for the April 18, 1984 Regular Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission' This agenda, including all subdivision cases, will be published in the Kodiak Daily Mirror on April 11 and 18, 1984. It will also be published in the Kadiak Times on April 13, 1984, DISTRIBUTION LIST: Nancy & William Missal Deborah & Robert 8urgy Barbara & 8ill SwoarinqYn Cathy Cordry Peter Bollenbacher Ilva Murbach Fox Shawn Dillon Mr. Dan Ogg Ms. Pat Lods If you require any additional information on any zoning case, please contact the Community Development Department at 486-5736, extension 258' '-g -' DATE: APRIL 18, I984 Planning and ZonIng Commission Agenda 1. CASE 84-019' Request to rezone Lot 1, Block 6, U.S. Survey 3066 A&B and U.S. Survey 2739 (Cove Trailer Court) from RR1 District to Business District in accordance with Section 17.72 (Amendments and Changes)(Wllliam A. Bardot). 2. CASE 84-020. Request to purchase 15 acres of presently leased Borough real property in accordance with Chapter 18'30 (Sale of Borough Land). This property is a portion of ADL 44355, Monashka Bay Drive (Timberline, Inc.). CASE 84-021. Request for a variance from Section 17.18'050 (Yards) and Section 17'40'010 (Projections into Required Yards) to allow construction of additions onto the front and side of the existing structure on Lot 6A, Block 54, East Addition. This property is physically located at 1713 Rezanof Drive (Michael C. 8rochan), 4. CASE 84-023' Request for a variance from Section 17'60'030 (Residential Districts) to permit an illuminated sign in a multi-family residential district. This property is located on Lot 198, Block 5, Erskine Subdivision; 411 Rezanof Drive (Travel Center, Inc.). 5. CASE 84-024, Request for a variance from Section 17.19.040 (Yards) to allow the construction of an attached garage into the required front yard setback. This property is located on Lot 1, Block 7, Aleutian Homes Subdivision; 416 Thorsheim Street (Donald Keegan). 6. CASE 84-025 Request for variance from Section 17'13'050 (Yards) to permit the construction of three single-family dwellings on one lot. This property is located in Section 10, Township 23 South, Range 19 West, Serward Meridian (Kitoi Bay Hatchery)(Alaska Department of Trans- portation/Public Facilities). CASE 84-026. Request to rezone Lots 21 through 24 and Lots 6 through 9, U.S, Survey 3099 from Rural Residential (RR1) to Multi-family Residential (R3) in accordance with Chapter 17.72 (Amendments and Changes). The property is generally located on Mission Road, near Jackson's Mobile Home Park (representative property owners). ' CASE 86-027 Request for variances from Sections 17'57'020 (Off-Street Parking-- Number of Spaces Required) and 17'57'030 (Off-Street Parking-- Location) to permit the expansion of a business structure and to provide parking on Lots 2 through 7, Block 3, New Kodiak Subdivision, 207 8helikuf Avenue (N.C. Sutliff & Sons, Inc.). 9. CASE 84-030' Request for a variance from Section 17'18'050/C\, Yards, to permit the construction of a home addition that encroaches into the required rear lot setback on Lot 12, Block 50, East Addition Subdivision. This property is located at 1.511 Rezanof Drive (David and Karla Harville). DRAFT AGENDA - 1 - March 23, 1984 DRAFT AGENDA - 2 - March 23, 1984 �.� 10. CASE 84-0 Request for variances from Sections 17.57'020 (Off-street Parking-- Number of Spaces Required) and Section 17'57'040 (Parking Area Development Standards) to permit construction of an auditorium. Lot 4, U.S. Survey 2538B (Kodiak Island Borough), 11. CASE 84-032. Request for a variance from Section 17'57'020 (Off-Street Parking-- Number of Spaces Required) to provide less parking than required on Lot 8, Block 3, New Kodiak Subdivision; 218 Shel|kofAvonue (Ernest H. Mills)' 12. CASE 84-D33.' Request to rezone Lots 7 through 18, Block 2, Island Lake Subd., U.S, Survey 3219, from Business (B) to Single-Family Residential (K1) in accordance with Chapter 17.72 (Amendments and Changes\. This area is bordered by Island Lake Road, Ptarmigan Pass, Kittiwake St., and Arctic Tern (Residents of Island Lake Community). 13, CASE 84-034' Request for a variance from Section 17'57,020 (Off-Street Parking-- Number of Spaces Required) to provide less parking spaces than required on Tract 81, U.S. Survey 1682. This property is generally located at Rezanof and Woodland Drive (Assembly of God Church). 14. CASE 84-035. Request to Rezone Portions of U.S. Surveys 3099, 3100, and 3181 from Rural Residential District (RR1) to Two-Family Residential District (R2). This property is located on Mission Road, from -Jackson's Trailer Court to the and of U.S. Survey 3101 (Community Development Department). 15. CASE 84-036. Request for variances from Sections 17.20.030/B\, Lot Width, and 17.20.040(B)^ Side Yards, to allow a zero-lot-line dwelling on Lot 8, Block 1, Russell Estates, First Addition; 1215 Sel\ef Lane (Eugene Mueller). NOTE: This draft agenda may not include any of the subdivision cases that the Commission will hear at the April 18, 1984 Regular Meeting. if you require any additional information on any zoning case, please call the Kodiak Island Borough, Community Development Department at: 486-5736 extension 255 or 258