ERSKINE ADD BK 6 LT 2 - VarianceArnold Shryock
Box 2112
Kodiak, Alaska 99615
Dear Mr. Shryock:
Kodiak Island Borough
710 MILL BAY ROAD
KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340
PHONE (907) 486-5736
December 19, 1985
50. -74e-- A-1701-reaAls txreP batotAl 1144-e-
-(e)i,ofAierL (1.4d,r4ucc--
hukleA - ,
660eD oP A-ilr(s
oadlreel-
AO'
RE: CASE 85-084. Request for a variance from Section 17.36.070 (General
Provisions) of the Borough Code to permit the expansion of the cubical
content of a nonconforming single-family residence in order to replace
the existing roof and provide an additional 26-foot by 38.3-foot second
floor living area within the existing structure; and a
Request for a variance from Section 17.19.040 (Yards) of
the Borough Code to permit a new raised roof to encroach .55-feet into
the required 5.85-foot side yard setback in a R2--Two-Family Residential
District. Lot 2, Block 6, Erskine Subdivision; 418 Mill Bay Road.
The Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting on
December 18, 1985, granted your request for the variances cited above and
adopted the following findings of fact in support of their decision:
A. For the requested expansion of the cubical content; and
B. For the requested .55-foot encroachment into the required side yard
setback, as follows:
1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the
property or intended use of development, which generally do not apply to
other properties in the same land use district.
A. The unique physical condition in this case is the existing
nonconforming structure located on the lot. Any expansion of this
structure will require a variance.
B. The unique physical condition in this case is the existing
nonconforming structure located on the lot. Naturally, a
replacement roof would have to encroach into the setback to cover
the entire extent of the existing structure. The proposed
additional encroachment only results from a steeper pitched roof
line.
2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical
difficulties or unnecessary hardships.
A. The strict application of the zoning ordinance would only allow the
existing roof to be replaced, not raised. This is an unnecessary
"N.
Kodiak Island Borough
Arnold Shryock
December 19, 1985
Page Two
hardship because if the existing house was oriented differently on
the lot, no variance would be necessary. Also, the raised roof will
not be substantially taller than the existing roof.
B. The strict application of the zoning ordinance would only allow the
existing roof to be replaced, not raised. This is an unnecessary
hardship because if the existing house was oriented differently on
the lot, no variance would be necessary. Also, the raised roof will
not be substantially taller than the existing roof.
3. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or
prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the
public's health, safety, and welfare.
A. Granting the variance will not result in material damage or
prejudice to other properties in the area. The additional height of
the roof results in only a minor encroachment (less than one foot)
that will not increase the overall density of the area and, due to
the location of the structure, will not block potential ocean views.
B. Granting the variance will not result in material damage or
prejudice to other properties in the area. The additional height of
the roof results in only a minor encroachment (less than one foot)
that will not increase the overall density of the area and, due to
the location of the structure, will not block potential ocean views.
4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of
the Comprehensive Plan.
A. Granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of
the comprehensive plan which identifies this area for medium - density
residential development.
B. Granting, of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of
the comprehensive plan which identifies this area for medium - density
residential development.
5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or
financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance.
A. In this case, staff has reviewed departmental files and can find no
indication that actions of the applicant caused the existing
structure to be nonconforming from the required side yard setback.
B. In this case, staff has reviewed departmental files and can find no
indication that actions of the applicant caused the existing
structure to be nonconforming from the required side yard setback.
Kodiak Island Borough
Arnold Shryock
December 19, 1985
Page Three
6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use
in the district involved.
A.
Single - family residential use is permitted in this district.
B. Single- family residential use is permitted in this district.
B. Move to grant a variance from Section 17.19.040 (Yards) of the Borough
Code to permit a new raised roof to encroach 0.55 -feet into the required
5.85 -foot side yard setback in a R2 -- Two - Family Residential District.
Lot 2, Block 6, Erskine Subdivision, and to adopt the findings contained
in the staff report as "Findings of Fact" for this case.
An appeal of this decision may be initiated by any person or party aggrieved
by filing a written notice of appeal with the City Clerk within ten days of
the date of the Commission's decision. The notice of appeal must state the
specific grounds for the appeal. Therefore, the Commission's decision will
not be final and effective until ten days following the decision.
Failure to utilize these variances within 12 months after their effective date
shall cause their cancellation. Please bring this letter with you if you need
to come into our office to obtain zoning compliance for any construction on
your lot.
If you have any questions about the action of the Commission, please contact
me.
Sincerely,
Robert H. Pederson, Assistant Planner
Community Development Department
pm
cc: Case No. 85 -084
case. The motion was seconded CARRIED by unanimous roll call
vote.
FINDINGS OF FACT:
1. That the use as proposed in the application, or under
appropriate conditions or restrictions, will not
(A) endanger the public's health, safety, or general
welfare, (B) be inconsistent with the general purposes and
intent of this title, and (C) adversely impact other
properties or uses in the neighborhood.
A. The granting of an exception should not be detrimental
to the public's health, safety or general welfare. The
existing land uses are long established and
departmental files do not reflect that these uses have
posed any dangers to the public's health, safety or
welfare. The proposed new tanks are ADOT /PF approved
and have been inspected by the State Fire Marshall and
City Fire Department and found to be in good condition.
The enforcement officer has verified this information
and therefore they do not pose any additional safety
concerns.
B -2 The proposed use will be inconsistent with the general
purposes and intent of Title 17 and the specific
description and intent of the Business District because
the stated intent is to prohibit the use of Business
District lands for industrial purposes and to encourage
the discontinuance of existing uses that are not
permitted in the Business District. Moreover, two
previous administrative decisions have been made that
storage and handling of flammable liquids is not
permitted on Business zoned- property and that petroleum
or flammable liquid production, refining or storage is
only conditionally permitted in the Industrial
District.
C. The proposed use should not adversely impact other
properties in the area. Van gas and marine welding are
long established uses at this location and have not
proven to adversely impact other properties in the
area. Expansion of these uses by locating more LPG
tanks on the property will not change the land use, but
merely increase the percentage of the lot covered with
outdoor storage.
CASE 85 -084. Request for a variance from Section 17.36.070
(General Provisions) of the Borough Code to permit the expansion
of the cubical content of a nonconforming single - family residence
in order to replace the existing roof and provide an additional
26 -foot by 38.3 -foot second floor living area within the existing
structure; and a
Request for a variance from Section 17.19.040
(Yards) of the Borough Code to permit a new raised roof to
encroach .55 -feet into the required 5.85 -foot side yard setback
in a R2 -- Two - Family Residential District. Lot 2, Block 6,
Erskine Subdivision; 418 Mill Bay Road. (Arnold Shryock)
BOB PEDERSON indicated that 51 public hearing notices were mailed
for this case and none were returned. Staff recommended approval
of this request.
Regular Session Closed.
Public Hearing Opened:
Seeing and hearing none.
Public Hearing Closed.
Regular Session Opened:
COMMISSIONER KNUDSEN MOVED TO GRANT A VARIANCE from Section
17.36.070 (General Provisions) of the Borough Code to permit the
expansion of the'cubical content of a nonconforming structure in
order to raise and replace the existing roof and provide an
P .& Z Regular Meeting
-11- - December 18, 1985
additional 26 —foot by 38.3 —fool a•ond floor living area in the
existing nonconforming single — family residence in a
R2 -- Two — Family Residential District. Lot 2, Block 6, Erskine
Subdivision, and to adopt the findings contained in the staff
report as "Findings of Fact" for this case. The motion was
seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll call vote.
COMMISSIONER KNUDSEN MOVED TO GRANT A VARIANCE from Section
17.19.040 (Yards) of the Borough Code to permit a new raised roof
to encroach 0.55 —feet into the required 5.85 —foot side yard
setback in a R2 -- Two — Family Residential District. Lot 2, Block
6, Erskine Subdivision, and to adopt the findings contained in
the staff report as "Findings of Fact" for this case. The motion
was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll call vote.
FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. For the requested expansion of the cubical content; and
B. For the requested .55 —foot encroachment into the required
side yard setback, as follows:
Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable
to the property or intended use of development, which
generally do not apply to other properties in the same land
use district.
A. The unique physical condition in this case is the
existing nonconforming structure located on the lot.
Any expansion of this structure will require a
variance.
B. The unique physical condition in this case is the
existing nonconforming structure located on the lot.
Naturally, a replacement roof would have to encroach
into the setback to cover the entire extent of the
existing structure. The proposed additional
encroachment only results from a steeper pitched roof
line.
2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in
practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships.
A. The strict application of the zoning ordinance would
only allow the existing roof to be'replaced, not
raised. This is an unnecessary hardship because if the
existing house was oriented differently on the lot, no
variance would be necessary. Also, the raised roof
will not be substantially taller than the existing
roof.
B. The strict application of the zoning ordinance would
only allow the existing roof to be replaced, not
raised. This is an unnecessary hardship because if the
existing house was oriented differently on the lot, no
variance would be necessary. Also, the raised roof
will not be substantially taller than the existing
roof.
The granting of the variance will not result in material
damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor
be detrimental to the public's health, safety, and welfare.
A. Granting the variance will not result in material
damage or prejudice to other properties in the area.
The additional height of the roof results in only a
minor encroachment (less than one foot) that will not
increase the overall density of the area and, due to
the location of the structure, will not block potential
ocean views.
B. Granting the variance will not result in material
damage or prejudice to other properties in the area.
The additional height of the roof results in only a
minor encroachment (less than one foot) that will not
increase the overall density of the area and, due to
P & Z Regular Meeting
—12— December 18, 1985
the location of the cture, will not block potential
ocean views. -
4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the
objectives of the Comprehensive Plan.
A. Granting of the variance will not be contrary to the
objectives of, the comprehensive plan which identifies
this area for medium - density residential development.
B. Granting of the variance will not be contrary to the
objectives of the comprehensive plan which identifies
this area for medium- density residential development.
5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special
conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being
sought by the variance.
A. In this case, staff has reviewed departmental files and
can find no indication that actions of the applicant
caused the existing structure to be nonconforming from
the required side yard setback.
B. In this case, staff has reviewed departmental files and
can find no indication that actions of the applicant
caused the existing structure to be nonconforming from
the required side yard setback.
6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a
prohibited land use in the district involved.
A. Single - family residential use is permitted in this
district.
B. Single - family residential use is permitted in this
district.
I) CASE 85 -085. Request "for a variance from Section 17.36.060
(Nonconforming Uses of Land) of the Borough Code to permit a
nonconforming land use to be enlarged and extended to occupy a
greater area of land in order to construct 8 -foot by 8 -foot
arctic entries /mud rooms onto the front of two (2) existing
single- family residences; and a
Request for a variance from Section 17.17.050
(Yards) of the Borough Code to permit the two (2) new arctic
entries /mud rooms to encroach into the required 25 -foot front
yard setback in a RR1- -Rural Residential One District. Tract A,
U.S. Survey 1672; located, on Anton Larsen Island. (Laura M.
Olsen)
BOB PEDERSON indicated that 26 public hearing notices were mailed
for this case and 1 was returned, in favor and 1 phone call was
received voicing non- objection to this request. Staff
recommended approval of this request.
Regular Session Closed.
Public Hearing Opened:
Seeing and hearing none.
- Public Hearing Closed.
Regular Session Opened:
COMMISSIONER KNIGHT MOVED TO GRANT A VARIANCE from Sections
17.36.060 and 17.36.070 of the Borough Code to permit a
nonconforming land use to be enlarged and increased in order to
construct 8 -foot by 8 -foot arctic entry /mud room additions onto
the front of the two (2) existing single-family residences in a
RR1- -Rural Residential One District on Tract A, U.S. Survey 1672,
and to adopt the findings contained in the staff report as
"Findings of Fact" for this case. The motion was seconded and
CARRIED by unanimous roll call vote.
COMMISSIONER KNIGHT MOVED TO GRANT A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE from
Section 17.17.050 of the Borough Code to permit the two (2) new
P & Z Regular Meeting
-13- December 18, 1985
Kodiak Island Borough
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 5, 1985
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Community Development Departmen
SUBJECT: Information for the December 1:, 985 Regular Meeting
ITEM VI -H
RE: CASE 85 -084. Request for a variance from Section 17.36.070
(General Provisions) of the Borough Code to permit the expansion of
the cubical content of a nonconforming single - family residence in
order to replace the existing roof and provide an additional 26 -foot
by 38.3 -foot second floor living area within the existing structure;
and a
Request for a variance from Section 17.19.040 (Yards)
of the Borough Code to permit a new raised roof to encroach .55 -feet
into the required 5.85 -foot side yard setback in a R2 -- Two - Family
Residential District. Lot 2, Block 6, Erskine Subdivision; 418 Mill
Bay Road. (Arnold Shryock)
Fifty -one (51) public hearing notices were mailed on December 6, 1985.
1. Applicant: Arnold Shryock
2. Land Owner: Arthur and Shirley Atkinson
3. Request: For a variance from Section 17.36.070 (General Provisions) of
the Borough Code to permit the expansion of the cubical content of a
nonconforming single- family residence in order to replace the existing
roof and provide an additional 26 -foot by 38.3 -foot second floor living
area within the existing structure; and a
Request for a variance from Section 17.19.040 (Yards) of the
Borough Code to permit a new raised roof to encroach .55 -feet into the
required 5.85 -foot side yard setback in a R2 -- Two - Family Residential
District. Lot 2, Block 6, Erskine Subdivision; 418 Mill Bay Road.
4. Purpose: To allow the existing roof to be raised and replaced which will
provide an additional 26 -foot by 38.3 -foot second story living area, and
to allow the new roof to encroach .55 -feet into the required side yard
setback.
5. Existing Zoning: R2 -- Two- Family Residential
6. Zoning History: The 1968 Comprehensive Plan identifies this lot as
Residential -R2. Departmental files indicate no further activity.
7. Location:
CASE 85 -084
-1- December 18, 1985 P &Z
Physical: 418 Mill Bay Road
Legal: Lot 2, Block 6,'Erskine Subdivision
8. Lot Size: 5,376 square feet
9. Existing Land Use: Two story Single-Family Residential
10. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
North: Lot 69, Block 8, Erskine Subdivision
Use: Duplex
Zoning: R2
South: Lot 4, Block 6, Erskine Subdivision
Use: Single-Family Residence
Zoning: R2
East: Lot 1, Block 6, Erskine Subdivision
Use: Vacant
Zoning: R2.
West: Lot 3, Block 6, Erskine Subdivision
Use: Single-Family Residence
Zoning: R2
11. Comprehensive Plan: The 1968 Comprehensive Plan depicts this area as
medium-density residential development.
12. Applicable Regulations: The following sections of Title 17 (Zoning) of
the Borough Code are applicable to this request:
17.36.070 General Provisions.
C. Repairs and Maintenance. On any nonconforming structure or on any
building devoted in whole or in part to any nonconforming use, work
may be done in any period of twelve consecutive months on nonbearing
walls, fixtures, wiring or plumbing, provided that the cubical
content of the building as it existed at the time of passage or
amendment of the ordinance codified herein shall not be increased.
17.19.040 Yards.
B. Side Yards. The minimum yard required, on each side of a principal
building, is ten (10) percent of the lot's width but need not exceed
twenty-five (25) feet. The minimum side yard required on the street
side of a corner lot is ten (10) feet.
COMMENTS:
The purpose of these variance requests is to allow the applicant to replace
and raise a portion of the roof on an existing nonconforming single-family
residence. The new roof will provide an increase in the cubical content of
the structure because of its steeper pitch. The new roof will also encroach
into the required side yard setback.
CASE 85-084
-2- December 18, 1985 P&Z
The existing single-family residence is nonconforming because it does not
comply with the side yard setback of the R2 district. The existing structure
encroaches .55-feet into the required 5.85-foot setback on the one side yard.
Expansion of the cubical content of a nonconforming structure and additional
setback encroachments require variances, hence these requests.
In order for the Commission to grant a variance, all of the following
conditions must be satisfied for each variance. The staff analysis of each
condition will be separately addressed for each variance:
A. For the requested expansion of the cubical content; and
B. For the requested .55-foot encroachment into the required side yard
setback, as follows:
1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the
property or intended use of development, which generally do not apply to
other properties in the same land use district.
A. The unique physical condition in this case is the existing
nonconforming structure located on the lot. Any expansion of this
structure will require a variance.
B. The unique physical condition in this case is the existing
nonconforming structure located on the lot. Naturally, a
replacement roof would have to encroach into the setback to cover
the entire extent of the existing structure. The proposed
additional encroachment only results from a steeper pitched roof
line.
2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical
difficulties or unnecessary hardships.
A. The strict application of the zoning ordinance would only allow the
existing roof to be replaced, not raised. This is an unnecessary
hardship because if the existing house was oriented differently on
the lot, no variance would be necessary. Also, the raised roof will
not be substantially taller than the existing roof.
B. The strict application of the zoning ordinance would only allow the
existing roof to be replaced, not raised. This is an unnecessary
hardship because if the existing house was oriented differently on
the lot, no variance would be necessary. Also, the raised roof will
not be substantially taller than the existing roof.
3. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or
prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the
public's health, safety, and welfare.
A. Granting the variance will not result in material damage or
prejudice to other properties in the area. The additional height of
the roof results in only a minor encroachment (less than one foot)
that will not increase the overall density of the area and, due to
the location of the structure, will not block potential ocean views.
CASE 85-084
-3- December 18, 1985 P&Z
B. Granting the variance will not result in material damage or
prejudice to other properties in the area. The additional height of
the roof results in only a minor encroachment (less than one foot)
that will not increase the overall density of the area and, due to
the location of the structure, will not block potential ocean views.
4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of
the Comprehensive Plan.
A. Granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of
the comprehensive plan which identifies this area for medium-density
residential development.
B. Granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of
the comprehensive plan which identifies this area for medium-density
residential development.
5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or
financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance.
A. In this case, staff has reviewed departmental files and can find no
indication that actions of the applicant caused the existing
structure to be nonconforming from the required side yard setback.
B. In this case, staff has reviewed departmental files and can find no
indication that actions of the applicant caused the existing
structure to be nonconforming from the required side yard setback.
6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use
in the district involved.
A. Single-family residential use is permitted in this district.
B. Single-family residential use is permitted in this district.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff finds that these requests do meet all the conditions necessary for
variances to be granted under Chapter 17.66 (Variance) of the Borough Code.
APPROPRIATE MOTIONS:
Should the Commission agree with the staff recommendations, the appropriate
motions are specified below:
A. Move to grant a variance from Section 17.36.070 (General Provisions) of
the Borough Code to permit the expansion of the cubical content of a
nonconforming structure in order to raise and replace the existing roof
and provide an additional 26-foot by 38.3-foot second floor living area
in the existing nonconforming single-family residence in a R2--Two-Family
Residential District. Lot 2, Block 6, Erskine Subdivision, and to adopt
the findings contained in the staff report as "Findings of Fact" for this
case.
CASE 85-084
-4- December 18, 1985 P&Z
B. Move to grant a variance from Section 17.19.040 (Yards) of the Borough
Code to permit a new raised roof to encroach 0.55-feet into the required
5.85-foot side yard setback in a R2--Two-Family Residential District.
Lot 2, Block 6, Erskine Subdivision, and to adopt the findings contained
in the staff report as "Findings of Fact" for this case.
CASE 85-084
-5- December 18, 1985 P&Z
HILLSIDE DRIVE
THORgHE NUM '44%, •
•' its
"654
d° CEDAR ?........� :... �.'•
. 4111@4, ;
1$11F"Arr.
A
t� , L�' 1•lL' ............ of
(-OWER � •
i A lift* .ASE
S..Q8
R_3 �5�
/r\ /
`` \r,
_ r /
r \.
Arno LK 6 •
1 d Shrock RS,(.rNE
+:`∎r, lltaler" 496.
N1101111106 A,
r \. / \`�, ri -_r \/4 \f[ \jig
\ ;1,
•
�so10r►r` •':
k
LOT 2 0
5� 376 sQ.f • A
%..
or co
gir* /49111
•4/•r cv,'4WT
fad ih„ p„m1 rA,r J owL
AS - BUILT SURVEY
OF At .111
ti
•
Roy A. Ecklund I§
• NO 1638 -S J,`'
,RION��OFESS\ \t�h� �'Sss
S�eae: /0 - 20'
1 hereby certify that 1 have surveyed the following described property:
for 2, B1_oc/- ' 6, ERSK/NE
SVBA/Vf8 /ON, i J S . St./4>VEK
P4>/•4K. ,4L 4 St/1' ` - PLAT* N° 50- /
h
pra
rla
ito to
iin the property
ing adj
the o
• n or a roc on t - rty t to to,
• a pro nts o pr petty 1 g • jacent rw on
he p ices in question nd that dt a ate no •ways. r -U-
nion lines or other visible easements an said property eaccpt indi•
cated hereon. r d
Dated this 3 —
day -of 19
at
0
t
0
pro
c
ROY A. ECKLUND
' Registered Laud Surveyor
S.J. Date: 3 NOV. / p30
Drawn
y
11.1 • • M.17—
(1-i4i5J41114i,
.nult:21tir-c.=
it. oi
rI;V-17-11t
is
c
ati(
1 (•
arra
; bas
-m 4
HE III
nni:
V. 717S
mot Physically Inspect Property
HEVERSE
FNMA Form 1004 Rev. 7179 4
�'
-
-�
___'.
��--'-
-_
--
`
-
^
-7
�
.
_
_
-
-
'�
i �
''
`
___
�
- --
-
-
�
�
�
---
_�
,'_--
�-
�
-'-'
'
_
_
'
--'-_-_-_'
___---_�_--''�
----'-
- .
_
.� �
--
.
''�--
-_-__-_--`---
�
_ `
''-1
-
-__'�_--_�-__
�
'
'�|
`-'
^�
- _
_l_
_-
--
' �
�
'
i
-'
�
- -
----~`-----
-
-
-
�
-
-
_`
---
-_
'-�-�^-
-__--
_�.1.'-.�-�__^_`-_-___'
-�-r-'--`-
-�-
'--
-
� |
_'.
��
. ��
-'---�
1,
�
,
�-_
'-�-
_^�
'
---
'_--i�
'
.�
'
' -
--
-'-~
�
---
,�
.
'
�� ]
'
�
�
�
__
-'--
'-
-
`
•
'
-
'
� (
'
`
�
^�'-.
..'
'
'
__'
.��
'
_|
/'
'`-
--
_
-'
.
_-� -
�^.
-
�
..
|
.|
i�
!.
...
..
.
/
|!
|'
i
/|
(
.;
]
|
4/or rvieggrier
fda lfPa��"Aiio''ti owL f'
AS-BUILT SURVEY
® 1 hereby certify that I have surveyed the following described property:
44-4 of AL 11® LOT /2� 2, LocAt- 6, ERSk/A'
eoee°e.o ®o ^f� �� S'/JBbivi.9 /c9/v� L✓ S. SLJI VL -562,
ev
Ay : .; I.►a° o °° Ve X.67/)/X.67/)/4/-<. 4L.4 PLAT- Ne 50
a
lau
* 4, and that th 'mprov; is situ -tedt ereona ithin the property fines
®® nc Be ®•40ue�oucn�.do a••o.. • • rlap or e croac on t pro -.erty ing adj t th to.
e. pro ents o pr.- .pertY lY g; djacent ther o en -roa on
°•fin• „ • & � Jthe p ices in question nd that th re are no ways. r is-
4) a Roy A. EckIUnd 0.. 1 lit c :u_ said property except indi
�% B NO. 1638 -S •‚ s r,a or
®�fFpc,Oe• ®ao•.•e�• ®`o °gips Dated his 3 day of // 0
pROFESSIONA� � `� /
® ® ®Vtae gt.— ROY A. ECKLUND
Scale: /a, 20
' Registered Land Surveyor
Drawn by: S.J` 4.
(Date: 3 NOV ASO O
ISLA; ;D BOROUGH:.:
POST OFFICE SOX 1246.,°
`KODIAK, ALASKA 99615
Conditional Use Permit
Exception
Variance
1) Zoning Change. From :
CODE SECTION INVOLVED :'`' '` t
NOTE:
The application fee for 'all items covered b
.Conditional Use Permits, Exceptions, and Variance Applications'a e
-the submission of a.site plan. Y this form.is 550..E
:::�`. � �s,:'• lso require
Subdivision Name.
United States Survey 4
CASH RECEIPT
•/-\ 7530
Kodiak. Island Borough
RECEIVED
FROM •
• - 700 UPPER MILL BAY ROAD
P.O. BOX 1246
KODIAK, ALASKA 99615
PHONE (907) 486-5736
DA;2;
MD: M f,ED1
‘4-
Cc
• c(4■14. Wal
'- F
Lr
rt)i .1? Ctr.1
1:cC,
Ceks,
51.2"141
Fgr.t4IV..5.! X''
ro.4k Cp,
"
11S. I?
; 4 Lsrf
s.Ara
---C9440?
- 000 - 101 - 10-
010 - 000 - 105 - 01 -
010- - 000 - 105 - 06 - 00
040 - 000 - 371 - 11 - 00
040 - 000 - 371 -12-00
010 - 000 - 322 - 11 - 00
010-000-322-17-00
010-000-341-50-00
010 - 000 - 341 - 51 - 00
010-000-111-61-00
CASH
PROPERTY TAX REAL
PROPERTY TAX, PERSONAL
LAND SALE, PRINCIPAL
LAND SALE, INTEREST
BUILDING PERMITS
ZONING PERMITS
SALE OF MAPS
SALE OF COPIES
PROPERTY TAX, LIENS
PER ATTACHED
12:k A ■("C.,e--
,c)
CONDITIONS OF CHECK PAYMENTS
PAYMENTS TENDERED BY CHECK FOR OBLIGATIONS DUE TO
THE BOROUGH ARE SATISFIED ONLY UPON THE CHECK BEING
HONORED. RETURNED CHECKS FOR ANY REASON RESTORES THE OBLIGATION AS
UNPAID AND SUBJECTS THE PAYER TO ANY CHARGES. FEES OR OTHER LEGAL
LIABILITIES AS MAY BE APPLICABLE.
TOTAL 0*
CASHIER .
OS
c� QQA
PAYOR
PAYMENT
1ECK NO,
CASH
OTHER
DE
FMO8-511815
(Th
Arthur J. Atkinson
Shirley A. Atkinson
Box ENE
Cordova, Alaska
Greetings and salutations:
Let it be known by this document that we have given our
permission for Arnold L. Shryock and/or Sondra M. Shryock to apply For
a varianceon our-property located at 418 Upper Mill bay road (Lot two
[2], Block .six C61,'Erskine Subdivision.
Arthur 3. Atkinson Shirle A. Atkinson
Arnold Shryock
Box 2112
Kodiak, Alaska 99615
Kodiak Island borough
710 MILL BAY ROAD
KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 -6340
PHONE (907) 486 -5736
December 6, 1985
RE: CASE 85 -084. Request for a variance from Section 17.36.070 (General
Provisions) of the Borough Code to permit the expansion of the cubical
content of a nonconforming single - family residence in order to replace
the existing roof and provide an additional 26 -foot by 38.3 -foot second
floor living area within the existing structure; and a
Request for a variance from Section 17.19.040 (Yards) of
the Borough Code to permit a new raised roof to encroach .55 -feet into
the required 5.85 -foot side yard setback in a R2 -- Two - Family Residential
District. Lot 2, Block 6, Erskine Subdivision; 418 Mill Bay Road.
Dear Mr. Shryock:
Please be advised that
action by the Planning
regular meeting. This
Chambers, 710 Mill Bay
is recommended.
your application for has been scheduled for review and
and Zoning Commission at their December 18, 1985
meeting will begin at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly
Road, Kodiak, Alaska. Your attendance at this meeting
One week prior to the regular meeting, Wednesday, December 11, 1985, at
7:30 p.m. in the Borough conference room, the Commission will hold a work
session to review the packet material for the regular meeting. You are
cordially invited,to attend this work session in order to respond to any
questions the Commission may have regarding your request.
The Community Development Department will be happy to provide you with any
additional information.
Sincerely,
Patricia Miley
Planning Secretary
Community Development Department
cc: Case File
c►`
KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
710 Mill Bay. Road
Kodiak, Alaska 99615
ITEM VI -H
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
A public hearing will be held on Wednesday, December 20, 1985. The meeting
will begin at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough'Assembly Chambers., 710 Mill Bay Road,
Kodiak, Alaska, before the Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning
Commission, to hear comments, if any, on the following request:
CASE 85 -084. Request for a variance from Section 17.36.070 (General
Provisions) of the Borough Code to permit the expansion of the cubical
content of a nonconforming single - family residence in order to replace the
existing roof and provide an additional 26 -foot by 38.3 -foot second floor
living area within the existing structure; and a
Request for a variance from Section 17.19.040 (Yards) of the
Borough Code to permit a new raised roof to encroach .55 -feet into the
required 5.85 -foot side yard setback in a R2 -- Two - Family Residential
District. Lot 2, Block 6, Erskine Subdivision; 418 Mill.Bay Road.
If you do not wish to testify verbally, you may provide your comments in
the space below, or in a letter to the Community Development Department
prior to the meeting.
You are being notified because you are a property owner in the area of
the request. If you have any questions about the request, please call
us at 486 -5736, extension 255.
Your name: Mailing Address:
Your property description:
Comments:
fi:
:::::::::: ::::::::::
4AlitlingennUNIVZOlo
::::::::::::::::::::::
inm1211,
• 6 E D E urvel o r : : yj ,
.4,0gE X1.1 \ \ •swN 4
•
HILLSIDE DRIVE
\fit
• •• •'t+.
• • • •
•
OAD
� \ ~R�32S Arnold sh��k IC /Ns
_\/1 \ -.
\: � I / \..
`t \' \
/ i5,
\.' /`i ir'`\ / \ i\. 0 -!il'
.
\ \/* \/i \/1'
\ '
•M R,
'0130140
BROOKS.RONALCLE ' NDA
P.O. BOX 3923
• KODIAK AK 99615
. R1040130150
-SALMINE.RICHARD & LORNA
P.O. BOX 2747
KODIAK AK 99615
WEBER.WILLIAM
P:O. BOX 2811
KODIAK
GRABER,SAMUEL •
P.O. BOX 706
KODIAK
R1040130160
RIKA
AK 99615
R1040130110
AK 99615
R1040130270
KOD IS PROP CEMETERY
P.C. BOX 706
KODIAK AK 99615
R1040130280
CITY OF KODIAK
.KODIAK -AK 99615
R1140050150
ABENA.TIM PAMELA
P.O. BOX 2287 '
412 ERSKINE
KODIAK AK 99615
WILEY.EDITH
P.O. BOX 446
410 ERSKINE
KODIAK
WILEYIEDI
P.O. BOX 44
310 ERSKINE
KODIAK. AK 15
R1140050160
AK 99615
P1140050180
R1140050192
CHRISTIETKNOX E LORENA
P.O. BOX 801
411 ERSKINE
•' KODIAK
DEMKE.RIC,
P.O. BOX 987
KODIAK
AK 99615
R1 40060010
AK
rst z_ 5-7 7041i<
R1443000050
KODIAK ISLAN: IROUGH
OKL 17
710 MILL BAY RD
KODIAK AK 99615
WILLIA
P.O. BO
MOUNTA
R1040130030
RONALD & PHYLLIS
417
CA 94040
EATON.3ARBARA A
A/K/A PAZ.BARBARA
P.O. BOX 15B
UNALASKA
RI040130040
AK 99685
R1040130050
PETERSON.GARY C & STACIE
P.O.BOX'1221 -
KODIAK AK 99615
R1040130060
DELEON...JO JO & HELEN
P.O. BOX 762 USCG
KODIAK AK 99619
R1040130070
MOORE.GEO J &CAROLINE J
P.O. BOX 226
KODIAK AK 99615
• R1040130080
SEVERSON.MYRON & PHYLLI
P.O. BOX 1941
KODIAK AK 99615
GRABER.SA
P.O. BOX 706
KODIAK
R1040130091
99615
RI040130110
•
KRAYER.RICHARD & FLORENCE
, • P.O. BOX 2052
KODIAK AK 99615
. R1640130120
SHEPARD.RICHARD & HELEN
P.O. BOX 1344
KODIAK AK 99615
R1040130130
CLOD'IFELTER.GORDON
516 CAROLYN
KODIAK • • AK 99615
MCMASTER*KAY L R11
WASHBURN,DANIEL L 400
P.O. BOX 2151 601
311 ERSKINE 40
KODIAK AK 99615
�'" R1140060020
ATKINSON,ARTHV SHIRLEY
P.O. BOX 379
CORDOVA AK 99574
• R1140060770
MANN,JOAN A ESQUIRE
ONE MARITIME PLAZE.STE950
,SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111
MANN.JACK EDWARD •II.I, • R11
MANN,M.DIANE 400
P.O. BOX 245 607
412 MILL BAY ROAD 80
KODIAK AK 99615
R1140060790
WILEY,THEODORE
P.O. BOX 244
414 MILL BAY ROAD
KODIAK, AK 99615
' BLM
.R1140060800
R1140060850
STEVENS :GARY & RITA
P.O. BOX 201
310 MILL BAY ROAD
. KODIAK AK'99615
R1140060860 :.
BLASCHKA,RAE JEAN
P.O. BOX 943
312 MILL BAY ROAD
. KODIAK AK 99615
R1140060870
SIGLER,MICHAEL W & JANIS
P.O. BOX 2192
KODIAK AK 99615
R1140060880
'THISSEN *MARK & THOMAS
P.O. BOX 3262
KODIAK AK 99615
R1140080590
AYAZ,MUHAMMAD & PARVEEN
US REP /JECOR
APO NEW YORK NY 29038.;,..;
•
R 11,40080600
GREGORY *MARE• .&
P.O.BOX 2214`
412 CAROLYN
KODIAK • AK 99615 •
R1140060030
FANNIN,VERNON & KATHERINE
P.O. BOX 572
416 MILL BAY ROAD
KODIAK AK 99615
R1140060040
DEMKE,RICHARD & JOANNE
P.O. BOX 987
KODIAK AK 99615
R1140060050
VANBUREN,RAYMOND & HILDUR
P.O. BOX 415
KODIAK AK'99615
R1140060060
LAWHEAD,DONALD & IRENE
P.O. BOX 2427
415 ERSKINE
KODIAK AK 99615
R1140060070 .
LESTER,ELDON & LILA .
P.O. BOX 845
KODIAK . ' AK 99615
FELTON,HARRY &'LORRAINE •R11
DAYTON.LORRAINE 400
P.O. BOX 287 600
411 ERSKINE _ • 80
. KODIAK AK 99615
R1140060100
SUPERIOR BUILDING SUPPLY
DRAWER 1150
321 ERSKINE
KENAI AK 99611
R1140060110
NELSON,STANLEY & JUANITA
P.O. BOX 324
319 ERSKINE
KODIAK _ AK 99615
R1140060120
EGGEMEYER.JAMES & MARLYSS
P.O. BOX 965
KODIAK✓ AK 99615
R1140060130
PRATT *BERTHA THOMSON
P.0. BOX 242 .
315 ERSKINE
KODIAK AK 99615
PANAMAROFF,GEO E HELEN 31350
P.O.. 80X 123
306 WILSON
KODIAK
' WILIIAMS,RONALD
P.O. BOX 4171
421 CAROLYN ..
MOUNTAIN VIEW
AK 99615
R1140091040
PHYLLIS
CA. 94040
R1140080610 ,
FITZGERALD,MAF ,,E R
416 CAROLYN
KODIAK AK '99615
FITZGE'ALD,MARIANE
P.O. BO
416 CAROLY
KODIAK AK 9961
R1140080620
R1140080650
TABATA,FRANCIS /SHORB,DARL
P.O. BOX 889 USCG
KODIAK AK 99619
R1140080660
BISHOP,CRAIG & BETTE
P.U. BOX 3905
KODIAK AK 99615
R1140080670
RANDOLPH,EDWARD & MARY J
P.O. BOX 200
.. KODIAK AK 99615
R1140080700
FIELDS,DEWITT & WANDA
P.O. BOX 25
425 MILL BAY ROAD
KODIAK AK 99615
R1
FARRELL,RHONNY M
P.O. BOX 234
423 MILL BAY ROAD
KODIAK. AK 99615
0080710
R1140080720
MADSEN,ROY H & LINDA L
P.O. BOX 726
KODIAK AK 99615
R1140080740
BLANKENBURG,ERIC & C
P.O. BOX 707
417 MILL BAY ROAD
KODIAK AK 99615
R.1140080761-
SUYOAM,ANTRIL /
PRESCOTT,LORRAINE L.
231 SKYLINE DR
EDMONDS WA 98020
R1140081340
BYLER■'JERRY & BARBARA I
. P.O. BOX 1591
304 WILSON
. KODIAK' AK 99615"
46/17
1D7
7o
7f
7S- 7(e,
-1`f- go
135"
o8 13So✓
:1•..*f..:::::::::::■..jA?..R.......-
HILL SIDE DRIVE •
o .t. .•, 0 :feA
"la m 1 iiiir
e1 l
Wt'l-1W111I1I 1 1. .W16a1'484'
:.::
0Mi-7 ,4" iq o i : a
,,.. 4•114()
111$.11'*.
fiallisfiliMik .11,r4Up.,
iohNt 4 1414414741.
LOWER
04,... ___■iiiropm..-...4 .°01 ' . iiiiii lilt
J
MILL IL
FAB a :irrighlaning* 111gpstb
itew ".•• • --
.:, / ,,
:,..,,,„
„ .,,,,_,,,,t,„3.25;. • '_ A-t-'262.c7,...-'',%.6-cpzs.cc\-;;z\'
..,..,
._•\.,/,,,,\ \, i,\\ .- ': ' ZOT...2. ' r -; \
-
Z-Vil \--i
sta LOO
st
110-istroile,
-4- l a
ti „
010. 1'4,, _ .
„
IV" mai,. b
NV" - -
iivIr.4 '
Ir."4".,1•6.
/0111M. _
IIA 11.. "VON. _ IVO
11■111116"Tro,
''''' 110411\117"` $44,111tiot
1464■111111110" iN,
.4:10■411„.. __. ortarsto
-$0110■---112.veystato,
......-106, "s• No v. we. Iii"- ,t.., -, 14.
:,..., low& ote•-•"-", .11i '134141lifit I
- " I r IriikrAllti :I b .1141i.,:a ifitkiir4.111:11:roliffi :111,2tviti 11 rill,liti b ,'',419 kl;rti 1 II,. toilsriyz '41401ifitkift „i
- ftini, *If
-.141"1117;111111:711:141:::11:: 0111:
."' +.111 I 1 rvile WI. * 410011V
."°844. ai."-"; ZWri gitit DI!
-.10,1111....,.. t 00,16 ' tkatti
A/ ••!..fl
..,,
-,r-,
/
e Ast
Ve:
\ /
I ve
51,3„Ar-,
;
.2/