KADIAK AK 1ST BK 1 LT 3A - VarianceLinda Wilson
Alaska Trojan Partnership
Alwert Fisheries
517 Bonaparte
Kodiak, Alaska 99615
Kodiak Island Borough
710 MILL BAY ROAD
KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340
PHONE (907) 486-5736
March 22, 1990
Re: Case 90-010. Request for a variance from Section 17.54.010C (Height--
Extension onto Public Property) of the Borough Code to permit chain link fence to
project into the Rezanof Drive right-of-way adjacent to a lot in the B--Business
Zoning District. Lot 3, Block 1, Kadiak Alaska First Addition; 3310 Rezanof Drive.
(Alaska Trojan Partnership; Alwert Fisheries)
Dear Ms. Wilson:
The Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting on March
21, 1990, granted the request for the variance cited above, subject to the following
conditions:
1. The fence is constructed at the applicant's sole expense.
2. The applicant assumes any liability associated with said fence on State-owned
property.
3. If at a future date the State determines that the fence must be removed from the
State-owned right-of-way, the applicant or any subsequent owner of Lot 3, Block
1, Kadiak Alaska First Addition, agrees to remove same without cost to the State.
4. Since the land is publicly owned, no prescriptive right accrues to the user.
5. Construction of the fence shall be in such a manner as not to reduce any
required off-street parking.
Kodiak Island Borough
Linda Wilson
Alaska Trojan Partnership
Alwert Fisheries
March 22, 1990
Page Two
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT ALLOW ANY CONSTRUCTION TO BEGIN. Zoning
compliance and/or a building permit must first be obtained. Please contact this office for
further details.
An appeal of this decision may be initiated by any person or party aggrieved by filing a
written notice of appeal with the Borough Clerk within ten (10) days of the date of the
Commission's decision. The notice of appeal must state the specific grounds for the
appeal and the relief sought by the applicant. Therefore, the Commission's decision will
not be final and effective until ten (10) days following the decision.
Failure to utilize this variance within twelve (12) months after its effective date shall
cause its cancellation. Please bring this letter when you come to our office to obtain
zoning compliance for any construction on the lot.
The Commission adopted the following findings of fact in support of their decision:
1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or
intended use of development, which generally do not apply to other properties in
the same land use district.
The exceptional condition applicable to the intended use of the property is largely
a perceptual one. Typically, residential property owners assume that all the land
out to the sidewalk or roadway edge is their "yard ", and that they should be able
to erect a fence of reasonable height around that yard. In addition, if the fence
was built along the property lines, strips of State property would remain outside
the fence between the property and the roadway. This property would not be
maintained by the adjacent property owner.
Kodiak Island Borough
Linda Wilson
Alaska Trojan Partnership
Alwert Fisheries
March 22, 1990
Page Three
Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical difficulties or
unnecessary hardships.
Strict application of the zoning ordinance would only allow the fence to the front
property line. This is an unnecessary hardship w hen many other fences in the
community have been permitted to encroach in the public right -of -way without
first receiving a variance. The Commission has also granted numerous
variances in the past for fences to project into the road rights -of -way.
3. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to
other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health, safety and
welfare.
Granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public's health, safety, or
welfare because a chain link fence will not pose a line of sight problem along the
Rezanof Drive right -of -way. Also, the conditions of approval will insure that any
future removal of the fence will not result in a cost to the public.
4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the
Comprehensive Plan.
Granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the
comprehensive plan which identifies this area for Mobile Home Court
development. " As indicated by the findings of fact for Case 88 -036, which was in
support of the rezone of this property to B-- Business, use of this property for
business purposes is only generally consistent with the comprehensive plan. It
was also noted that while the mobile home designation was out -of -date for the
property, mobile home court development is a very intensive development
classification which is generally similar in characteristics to commercial land
uses.
Kodiak Island Borough
Linda Wilson
Alaska Trojan Partnership
Alwert Fisheries
March 22, 1990
Page Four
5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial
hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance.
In this instance, actions of the applicant have caused the conditions from which
relief is being sought by a variance. This is due to the fact that half of the lot is
already fenced along the front where the fence is located in the right-of-way.
However, staff believes that the variance would have been requested prior to
construction if the applicant had understood that it was necessary.
6. That the wanting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the
district involved.
Fences are permitted in all land use districts.
If you have any questions about the action of the Commission, please contact the
Community Development Department.
Sincerely,
Patricia Miley, Secreta
Community Developmen partment
cc: Alwert Fisheries
plant in the area is located 900 to 1000 feet away and is unlikely
to be expanded to an extent that would affect this lot.
5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or
financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the
variance.
Actions of the applicant have not caused the conditions from
which relief is being sought by this variance. This variance will
be decided prior to any development of the site by the property
owner,
6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land
use in the district involved.
Single-family dwellings are a permitted use in the R2--Two-family
Residential Zoning District. In addition, the Borough Code
permits the development of a reasonable single-family dwelling
on any nonconforming lot in any residential zoning district
(subject to the granting of any variance that may be required).
The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll call vote.
D) Case 90-010. Request for a variance from Section 17.54.010C
(Hight--Extension onto Public Property) of the Borough Code to permit
chain link fence to project into the Rezanof Drive right-of-way adjacent
to a lot in the B--Business Zoning District, Lot 3, Block 1, Kadiak
Alaska First Addition; 3310 Rezanof Drive. (Alaska Trojan Partnership;
Alwert Fisheries)
DUANE DVORAK indicated 11 public hearing notices were mailed and
2 were retumed, stating non-objection to this request. Staff
recommended approval of this request, subject to conditions.
Regular Session Closed.
Public Hearing Opened:
BILL ALWERT appeared before the Commission and expressed
support for this request.
Public Hearing Closed.
Regular Session.Opened.
COMMISSIONER COLEMAN MOVED TO GRANT a variance from
Section 17.54.010C of the Borough Code to permit a chain link fence to
project twenty-eight (28) feet into the Rezanof Drive right-of-way
adjacent to a lot in the B--Business Zoning District on Lot 3, Block 1,
Kadiak Alaska First Addition; subject to the conditions of approval
contained in the staff report dated March 7, 1990; and to adopt the
findings contained in the staff report dated March 7, 1990 as "Findings
of Fact" for this case.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. The fence is constructed at the applicant's sole expense.
Page 7 at 22 P & 2 Minutes: March 21, 1990
Page 8 of 22
2. The applicant assumes any liability associated with said fence on
State-owned property.
3. If at a future date the State determines that the fence must be
removed from the State-owned right-of-way, the applicant or any
subsequent owner of Lot 3, Block 1, Kadiak Alaska First
Addition, agrees to remove same without cost to the State.
4. Since the land is publicly owned, no prescriptive right accrues to
the user.
5. Construction of the fence shall be in such a manner as not to
reduce any required off-street parking.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to
the property or intended use of development. which generally do
not apply to other properties in the same land use district.
The exceptional condition applicable to the intended use of the
property is largely a perceptual one. Typically, residential
property owners assume that all the land out to the sidewalk or
roadway edge is their "yard", and that they should be able to
erect a fence of reasonable height around that yard. In addition,
if the fence was built along the property lines, strips of State
property would remain outside the fence between the property
and the roadway. This property would not be maintained by the
adjacent property owner.
2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in
practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships.
Strict application of the zoning ordinance would only allow the
fence to the front property line. This is an unnecessary hardship
when many other fences in the community have been permitted
to encroach in the public right-of-way without first receiving a
variance. The Commission has also granted numerous
variances in the past for fences to project into the road rights-of-
way.
3. The wanting of the variance will not result in material damages
or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental
to the public's health, safety and welfare.
Granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public's
health, safety, or welfare because a chain link fence will not pose
a line of sight problem along the Rezanof Drive right-of-way.
Also, the conditions of approval will insure that any future
removal of the fence will not result in a cost to the public.
4. The grantino of the variance will not be contrary to the obiectives
of the Comprehensive Plan.
Granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of
the comprehensive plan which identifies this area for Mobile
Home Court development. As indicated by the findings of fact
P & 2 Minutes: March 21, 1990
for Case 88-036, which was in support of the rezone of this
property to B--Business, use of this property for business
purposes is only generally consistent with the comprehensive
plan. It was also noted that while the mobile home designation
was out-of-date for the property, mobile home court development
is a very intensive development classification which is generally
similar in characteristics to commercial land uses.
5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or
financial hardship from which relief is being sought bv the
variance.
In this instance, actions of the applicant have caused the
conditions from which relief is being sought by a variance. This
is due to the fact that half of the lot is already fenced along the
front where the fence is located in the right-of-way. However,
staff believes that the variance would have been requested prior
to construction if the applicant had understood that it was
necessary.
6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land
use in the district involved.
Fences are permitted in all land use districts.
The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll call vote.
E) Case 90-011. Request for a variance from Section 17.57.020A.2.0
(Parking--Number of Spaces Required) of the Borough Code to permit
the construction of additional miniwarehouse units without the required
one (1) parking space per unit on a lot in the B--Business Zoning
District. Lot 3, Block 3, Miller Point First Addition; 3751 Rezanof Drive.
(Tooth and Nail .Enterprises; Art Bors)
CHAIRPERSON HEINRICHS passed the gavel to COMMISSIONER
HENDEL for a determination of conflict of interest. CHAIRPERSON
HENDEL asked Commissioner Heinrichs if he would be paid regardless
of the decision made on this case. Commissioner Heinrichs responded
"yes." CHAIRPERSON HENDEL determined there was no conflict of
interest and passed the gavel back to CHAIRPERSON HEINRICHS.
DUANE DVORAK indicated 39 public hearing notices were mailed for
this case and 3 were returned, 1 opposing and 2 stating non-objection
to this request. Staff recommended approval of this request, subject to
conditions.
Regular Session Closed.
Public Hearing Opened:
ART BORS appeared before the Commission and expressed support
for this request.
Public Hearing Closed.
Regular Session Opened.
COMMISSIONER HARTT MOVED TO GRANT a variance from Section
17.57.020A.2.0 of the Borough Code to permit the construction of
Page 0 of 22 P & Z Minutes: March 21, 1990
SIME nin,SEF,/
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC FACILITIES
CENTRAL REGION - DIVISION OF DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
RIGHT OF WAY BRANCH
Linda Wilson
Alaska Trojan Partnership
517 Bonaparte Circle
Kodiak, AK. 99615
Dear Ms. Wilson:
STEVE COWPER, GOVERNOR
4111 AVIATION AVENUE
PO. BOX 196900
ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99519-6900
(FAX 248-9456) (907) 266-1621
March 7, 1990
RE: Project No. QS-0389(4)
Kodiak-Mill Bay Road
(Rezanoff Drive) Request to Place
Fence in Right of Way
ASP-389-4-002-1
We are in receipt of your. letter request dated March 1, 1990 concerning the
above referenced subject.
Currently, the department is researching your request. Since Federal Highway
.Administration concurrence is also required, departmental approval cannot be
granted until then. At that time, a full response will be forth coming.
If you have any questions, please contact Mary Thurman at 266-1631.
Sincerely,
Daniel W. Beardsley, SR/WA
Chief Right of Way Agent
Central Region
NT:lm
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
RE:
-Th
ITEM VI-D
Kodiak Island Borough
MEMORANDUM
March 7, 1990
Planning and Zoning Commission
Community Development Department
Information for the March 21, 1990 Regular Meeting
Case 90-010. Request for a variance from Section 17.54.010C (Height--
Extension onto Public Property) of the Borough Code to permit chain link
fence to project into the Rezanof Drive right-of-way adjacent to a lot in the
B--Business Zoning District. Lot 3, Block 1, Kadiak Alaska First Addition;
3310 Rezanof Drive. (Alaska Trojan Partnership; Alwert Fisheries)
Eleven (11) public hearing notices were distributed on March 2, 1990.
Date of site visit:
1. Applicant:
2. Land Owner:
Existing Zoning:
4. Zoning History:
March 7, 1990
Linda Wilson
Alaska Trojan Partnership; Alwert Fisheries
B--Business
The 1968 Comprehensive Plan identifies this lot as
Residential-R3. This lot was considered for rezoning by the
Commission in 1987 as part of an areawide rezoning
investigation (Case 87-036). No zoning change was
recommended at that time. This lot was rezoned from R3--
Mutilfamily Residential to B--Business by Ordinance 88-20-
0. Additional zoning history includes the following:
A request for an exception to allow fishing gear storage on
the lot was denied (Case 81-026).
Case 90-010 Page 1 of 6 P & Z: March 21, 1990
ITEM VI-D
A subsequent exception request to allow fishing gear storage
was approved with conditions (Case 82-002).
In April of 1986, the Commission removed the conditions
placed on the property by Case 82-002.
A request for an exception to allow a second fishing gear
storage building on the lot was approved in 1988 (Case 88-
023).
5. Location:
Physical: 3310 Rezanof Drive
Legal: Lot 3, Block 1, Kadiak Alaska Subdivision First Addition
6. Lot Size: 1.07 acres
7. Existing Land Use: Fishing gear storage and two warehouses
8. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
North: Lot 4, Block 1, Kadiak Alaska Subdivision First Addition
Use: Vacant
Zoning: B--Business
South: Lot 2, Block 1, Kadiak Alaska Subdivision First Addition
Use: Vacant
Zoning: R3--Multifamily Residential
East: Lots 2 and 3, Block 2, Kadiak Alaska Subdivision First Addition
Use: Vacant
Zoning: R3--Multifamily Residential
West: Tracts R1-A and R-2, U.S. Survey 3218
Use: Tract R1-A: Vacant (site work for hospital complete)
Tract R-2: Vacant
Zoning: R2--Two-family Residential
9. Comprehensive Plan: The 1968 Comprehensive Plan depicts this area for
Mobile Home Courts.
Case 90-010 Page 2 of 6 P & Z: March 21, 1990
ITEM VI-D
10. Applicable Regulations: The following sections of Title 17 (Zoning) of the
Borough Code and the Kodiak Island Borough
Coastal Management Program are applicable to this
request:
17.54.010 Height--Extension onto public property.
Fences and walls not exceeding six feet in height may occupy any portion of a
side or rear yard in any R district, provided that where such fence or wall projects
beyond the front yard line or setback line toward the front property line, the
following further restrictions shall apply:
C. No fence, wall or hedge shall be erected or maintained on the public
property beyond the front property line of any lot or parcel of land, except
masonry or concrete retaining walls, and then only to a height not to
exceed six inches above the grade of the earth such wall is constructed to
retain. A permit shall first be secured from the building official approving
the necessity for and type of such retaining wall.
COASTAL MANAGEMENT APPLICABLE POLICIES
The KIBCMP does not address minor structural developments such as fences.
COMMENTS
This request is intended to permit a chain link fence to project twenty-eight (28) feet into
the Rezanof Drive right-of-way.
In order for the Commission to grant a variance, all of the following conditions must be
satisfied.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or
intended use of development, which generally do not apply to other properties in
the same land use district.
The exceptional condition applicable to the intended use of the property is largely
a perceptual one. Typically, residential property owners assume that all the land
Case 90-010
Page 3 of 6 P & Z: March 21, 1990
ITEM VI-D
out to the sidewalk or roadway edge is their "yard", and that they should be able
to erect a fence of reasonable height around that yard. In addition, if the fence
was built along the property lines, strips of State property would remain outside
the fence between the property and the roadway. This property would not be
maintained by the adjacent property owner.
2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical difficulties or
unnecessary hardships.
Strict application of the zoning ordinance would only allow the fence to the front
property line. This is an unnecessary hardship when many other fences in the
community have been permitted to encroach in the public right-of-way without
first receiving a variance. The Commission has also granted numerous
variances in the past for fences to project into the road rights-of-way.
3. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to
other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health, safety and
welfare.
Granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public's health, safety, or
welfare because a chain link fence will not pose a line of sight problem along the
Rezanof Drive right-of-way. Also, the conditions of approval will insure that any
future removal of the fence will not result in a cost to the public.
4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the
Comprehensive Plan.
Granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the
comprehensive plan which identifies this area for Mobile Home Court
development. As indicated by the findings of fact for Case 88-036, which was in
support of the rezone of this property to B--Business, use of this property for
business purposes is only generally consistent with the comprehensive plan. It
was also noted that while the mobile home designation was out-of-date for the
property, mobile home court development is a very intensive development
classification which is generally similar in characteristics to commercial land
uses.
Case 90-010 Page 4 of 6 P & Z: March 21, 1990
ITEM VI -D
5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial
hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance.
In this instance, actions of the applicant have caused the conditions from which
relief is being sought by a variance. This is due to the fact that half of the lot is
already fenced along the front where the fence is located in the right -of -way.
However, staff believes that the variance would have been requested prior to
construction if the applicant had understood that it was necessary.
6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the
district involved.
Fences are permitted in all land use districts.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff finds that this request does meet all the conditions necessary for a variance to be
granted under Chapter 17.66 (Variance) of the Borough Code.
Case 90 -010 Page 5 of 6 P & Z: March 21, 1990
ITEM VI-D
APPROPRIATE MOTION
Should the Commission agree with the staff recommendation, the appropriate motion is:
Move to grant a variance from Section 17.54.010C of the
Borough Code to permit a chain link fence to project twenty-
eight (28) feet into the Rezanof Drive right-of-way adjacent to
a lot in the B--Business Zoning District on Lot 3, Block 1,
Kadiak Alaska First Addition; subject to the conditions of
approval contained in the staff report dated March 7, 1990;
and to adopt the findings contained in the staff report dated
March 7, 1990 as "Findings of Fact" for this case.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
The fence is constructed at the applicant's sole expense.
2. The applicant assumes any liability associated with said fence on State-owned
property.
If at a future date the State determines that the fence must be removed from the
State-owned right-of-way, the applicant or any subsequent owner of Lot 3, Block
1, Kadiak Alaska First Addition, agrees to remove same without cost to the State.
4. Since the land is publicly owned, no prescriptive right accrues to the user.
5. Construction of the fence shall be in such a manner as not to reduce any
required off-street parking.
Case 90-010 Page 6 of 6 P & Z: March 21, 1990
JCS 1689
USS 3512
at 3, Bloc
Kacia-( ist Aoo
oc \ot ce Area
K(IfIAK ISLAND BOROUurl
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska 99615
ITEM VI -D
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
A public hearing will be held on Wednesday, March 21, 1990. The meeting will begin at
7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska, before the Kodiak
Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission, to hear comments, if any, on the following request:
Case 90 -010. Request for a variance from Section 17.54.010C (Height -- Extension onto
Public Property) of the Borough Code to permit chain Zink fence to project into the
Rezanof Drive right -of -way adjacent to a lot in the B-- Business Zoning District. Lot 3,
Block 1, Kadiak Alaska First Addition; 3310 Rezanof Drive. (Alaska Trojan Partnership;
,Alwert Fisheries)
If you do not wish to testify verbally, you may provide your comments
to the Community Development Department odor to the meeting.
in the space below, or in a letter
in the area of the request. If you have
-5736, extension 255.
?� X 1510
This notice is being sent to you because our records indicate you are a property owner
any questions
� aboutjthe
- request, please feel free to call us at 486
Your Name: 11' 4l� Nciiiii1 iv Mailing Address:
Your property description: - 04- 4 Block._ I
Comments: T (w VLo 6193 ec.kc,v
-465
YeCti tie ST,
RECFIVF
MAR 6 - 1990
_ ,,,,o,,...�..... nrityriT nom
DEPT
KUOAK ISLAND BOROUGH
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPART
710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska 99615
PUBLIC HEARING NOTI
A public hearing will be held on Wednesday, March 21, 1990. The meeting will begin at
7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska, before the Kodiak
Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission, to hear comments, if any, on the following request:
Case 90 -010. Request for-.a variance from Section 17.54.010C (Height -- Extension onto
Public Property) of the Borough Code to permit chain Zink fence to project into the
Rezanof Drive right -of -way adjacent to a lot in the B -- Business Zoning District. Lot 3,
Block 1, Kadiak Alaska First Addition; 3310 Rezanof Drive. (Alaska Trojan Partnership;
Alwert Fisheries)
If you do'not wish to testify verbally, you may provide your comments in the space below, or in.a letter
to the Community Development Department prior, to the meeting.
This notice is being sent to you because our records indicate you are a property owner in the area of the request. If you have
any questions about the request, please feel free to call us at 486 -5736, extension 255.
Your Name: /6/ / side,/ Mailing Address: ■tea' L 2-7 J `
Your property description: ,e--- ! �1-
Comments:
RECFI%IEI
MAR 7- IMO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPT
Linda Wilson
Alaska Trojan Partnership
Alwert Fisheries
517 Bonaparte
Kodiak, Alaska 99615
Kodiak Island Borough
710 MILL BAY ROAD
KODIAK, ALASKA. 99615-6340
PHONE (907) 486-5736
March 2, 1990
Re: Case 90-010. Request for a variance from Section 17.54.010C (Height--Extension onto
Public Property) of the Borough Code to permit chain link fence to project into the
Rezanof Drive right-of-way adjacent to a lot in the B--Business Zoning District. Lot 3,
Block 1, Kadiak Alaska First Addition; 3310 Rezanof Drive. (Alaska Trojan Partnership;
Alwert Fisheries)
Dear Ms. Wilson:
Please be advised that the request referenced above has been scheduled for review and
action by the Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission at their March 21, 1990
regular meeting. This meeting will begin at 7:30 p.m. in the Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay
Road, Kodiak, Alaska. Attendance at this meeting is recommended.
The week prior to the regular meeting, on Wednesday, March 14, 1990, at 7:30 p.m. in the
Borough Conference Room (#121),- the Commission will hold a worksession to review the
packet material for the regular meeting. You are invited to attend this worksession in order to
respond to any questions the Commission may have regarding this request.
If you have any questions, please call the Community Development Department at 486-5736,
extension 255.
Sincerely,
Patricia Miley, Secr: ry
Community Development Department
KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska 99615
ITEM VI -D
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
A public hearing will be held on Wednesday, March 21, 1990. The meeting will begin at
7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska, before the Kodiak
Island Borough Planning and Zoning. Commission, to hear comments, if any, on the following request:
Case 90 -010. Request for a variance from Section 17.54.010C (Height -- Extension onto
Public Property) of the Borough Code to permit chain Zink fence to project into the
Rezanof Drive right -of -way adjacent to a lot in the B-- Business Zoning District. Lot 3,
Block 1, Kadiak Alaska First Addition; 3310 Rezanof Drive. (Alaska Trojan Partnership;
Alwert Fisheries)
If you do not wish to testify verbally, you may provide your comments in the space below, or in a letter
to the Community Development Department prior to the meeting.
This notice is being sent to you because our records indicate you are a property owner in the area of the request. If you have
_ any questions about the request, please feel free to call us at 486 -5736, extension 255.
Your Name: Mailing Address
Your property description:
Comments:
Lot 3, Block 1,
<ao;o< 1st AooWon
PLi Nonce Area
Vininun of 5)0 feet
fron exterior lot lines
V55 3,21 --nw1--
s 3.2.1 1?144.c4-- /e /4
4
POI Ll4m)D ill-to,&3 3440 77l44-^e1 6-- /
g /Vs- .1.0s-o 00
•■•■■..•
reic/s- ais-D
,e 7.23 5-0/e) 3oo V
k
714-e-r 8-j .5-0/0 o
s.-/ re/o
44-30-1A-kZ LJ pr- 77144i-7" j3/ .'
-7.rt c.e, 0/0
7zs-/ Co oS-0 V
0000 .%)K7
-1B1
FR C -1
11SS 1 682
USS 3512
TR R -2
US 321E
USS 469
TR C -1A
A -5
TR B
n
L
0
z
N
W
CC
12c(E) 90 -01:
Lot 3) BoL 1)
<GOi 1st AooWon
Puolic Notice Area
vinimun of 5:: feet
from exterior lot lines
KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
710 MILL BAY ROAD, ROOM 204, KODIAK ALASKA 996154340, (907) 486 -5736
The application fee for all Items covered by th /a form is fifty dollars ($50.00), except as otherwise noted
Conditional We Permits, Erceptone, and Variance applications ohm require the submission of a site plan.
Property owner's name:
Property owners mailing address:
City: (� 1'f C1I C1�I11
L State:
Home phone: gtRe — 4/84-16
If applicable, Agent's name: Li:Oda
Agent's mailing address:
Applicant Information
1.
sa r nn rr ersh/ /4/uer1- ��heries
517 ennparfe.
k
/, JWork phone:
Zip:
Q 9Le l 5
City: State: Zip:
Home phone: SA-A
Work phone:
Legal Description: La 4 3,
Property Information
6/0,t, 4 j !f F 4.47
Present use of property: %'- eu..F-
0
Proposed use of property: Va,���
0
4/5 e
Lt.
Applicant Certification
1, the sppllcent/authortzed agent, haw been advised of the procedures Involved with this request and have ',relayed a copy
of the appropriate regulations.
Authorized Agent's Signature Date
aria 04,7 � a-90
Property Owner's Signature Date
Code Section(sj invo
STAFF USE ONLY
(.54-f_O(C� C
Conditional Use Permit
Variance
Other (e.g., appearance requests, etc.) non -fee Items
Zoning ch
Application accepted:
//
from
AFL
Staff signature
Exception
Title 18 Review
to
a 73/50
ate ccepted
90 Yie D/D
RECEIVED
FROM
CASH RECEIPT
Kodiak Island Borouu..
710 UPPER MILL BAY ROAD
KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 -6340
PHONE (907) 486 -5736
Lilo /C 0. ti fie) 1r1
- 000 - 101 -10 -00
010 -000- 105 -01 -00
010 -000- 105 -06 -00
010 -000- 111 -61 -00
010 -000 -107- -00
040 - 000. -371 - 11 -00
040 - 000 - 371 -12 -00
010 -000- 368 -51 -00
010 -000- 322 - 11 -00
010 -000 -319- 10 -00
010- 000 - 199 -99 -00
C603DDRo bC
CONDITIONS OF CHECK PAYMENTS TOTAL P
PAYMENTS TENDERED BY CHECK FOR OBLIGATIONS DUE TO
CASH
PROPERTY TAX, REAL
PROPERTY TAX, PERSONAL
PROPERTY TAX, LIENS
PERSONAL TAX, LIENS
LAND SALE, PRINCIPAL
LAND SALE, INTEREST
SALE OF COPIES
BUILDING PERMIT.
PENALTIES, INTEREST
CLEARING
PER ATTACHED
16605
THE BOROUGH ARE SATISFIED ONLY UPON THE CHECK BEING
HONORED. RETURNED CHECKS FOR ANY REASON RESTORES THE OBLIGATION AS
UNPAID AND SUBJECTS THE PAYER TO ANY CHARGES, FEES OR OTHER LEGAL
LIABILITIES AS MAY B APPLICABLE.
CASHIER 0
PAYOR
PAYMENT MADE �BY:
ICHECK NO l (�`
❑ CASH
❑ OTHER
FM0B -511 B1 5
)
A•NDT. SCOTT
P O 0x :9
6X
IAK
AK 99615
3
6
7
8
R 02001
10
11
12
13
14
15
S6
17
18
S9
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
2
34
15
36
37
38
39
40
d1
2
3
4
P;REZ,A
P B
KO
ONY J
AK 99615
R7515020020
'EREZ`r AiNTHONY'
`6.. ,.
A'
AK 99615
GR- OTHE•LENHART
P.O. BOX 1504
JSQQI AK
R7 150 _20030
AK 99615
R7515020050
PEREZ,ANTHONY J/
P
KO
6
7
48
49
50
51
52
53
A
YN A
AK 99615
6
1
3
5
6
7
9
10
11
12
13
1 14
8145_, 101112
BRECHAN ENTERPRISES INC
P.O. BOX 1275
KOQZAK AK 99615
87235010300
ANr)ERSON ETAL,MICHAEL
LE>NHAR:T 'GROTHE
P40.4 BOX 2310
t
KODIA1( AK 99615
7 !9
15_
2
ti 004
X 48 9
KODI AK:'' AK. 99:6:15
2.1
2
2
2i
2:
3
34
35
36
37
4
38
39
40
41
42
43
4
45
4
47
48
49
50
'566
1<f) K
OKI.:;180
7`10
ISL'ANt BOROU'G'H
BAY RD•
. 0.75A 5011002 0
BE NT, DOROTHY
AKA DOROTHY MORRISON
341 EGAUIK DRIVE
ANCHORAGE AK, 99503
R75
0030
A1.iroER - FIS 1ER1 -ES ETA
ALASKA TROJAN FISHERIES
P. 0. ''BOX 17 1
ii Au-vo5
KOD.I AK
255
536
5457
6
5760
58
AK 99615
R145215001>1
CATHODIC E,ARCHB!SHOP' CORP
• POD BQX 1Q =Z2,39
ANCHORAGE._ AK 995'