Loading...
EAST ADD BK 56 LT 4 - VarianceKodiak Island Borough . Charles and Connie Johnson 1813 Rezanof Drive East Kodiak, Alaska 99615 P.O. BOX 1246 KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-1246 . PHONE (907) 486-5736 • August 18, 1988. RE: Case 88-049. Request for a variance from Section 17.54.010(A and C) of the Borough Code to permit a four (4) foot fence to project - thirty-five ..(35) feet (to the sidewalk) into, the- Rezanof : Drive Right-of-Way in a R1—Single-Family Residential Zoning District. Lot 4, Block 56, East Addition; 1813 Rezanof Drive East. (Charles and Connie Johnson) Dear Mr. and Ms. Johnson: • The Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting on August 17, 1988, granted the request for the variance cited above, subject to the following conditions: 1. The fence is constructed at the applicant's sole expense. 2. The applicant assumes any liability associated with said fence on State-owned property. 3. If at a future date the State determines that the fence.must be removed from State-owned property, the applicant or any subsequent owner of Lot 4, , Block 56,'East Addition, agrees ' . to:remove ,same without cost to the State. 4. Since the land is publicly owned, no prescriptive right . accrues to the user. • The Commission also adopted the following findings of fact in support of their decision: 1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property' or intended use of development, which generally do not apply to other properties in the same land use district. The exceptional condition applicable to the intended use of the property is . largely a perceptual one. Typically, the average property owner assumes that all the land'out to the sidewalk or ,roadway edge is their "yard," and that they should be able to erect a fence of any height around that • yard. In addition, if .the fence was built along the Kodiak Island Borough Charles and Connie Johnson August 18, 1988 ' Page Two property lines, stripe of State property would remain outside the fence. It is possible that this property would not then be maintained by the property owner. 2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships. Strict application of the zoning ordinance would only allow the fence to be placed on the property lines. This is an unnecessary hardship when many other fences in the community have encroached on the public property without first receiving a variance. The Commission has also granted variances in the past for fences to project into road rights-of-way. 3. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or preiudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare.. Granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public's health, safety or welfare because the fence does not pose a line of site problem along Rezanof Street. Also, the conditions outlined below ensure that any future removal of the fence will not impose a cost to the public. The erection of the fence into the right-of-way will hopefully ensure that the small strip of State property is maintained by the adjacent property owner to the benefit of the Public. 4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan identifies this area for Medium Density Residential development. Fences and other minor structural developments are not addressed in the Comprehensive Plan. 5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought bv the variance. In this instance, actions of the applicant have caused the conditions from which relief is being sought by variance. This is due to the fact that fence construction began prior to the granting of the variance. However, staff believes Kodiak Island Borough Charles and Connie Johnson August 18, 1988 Page Three that the variance would have been requested prior to the initiation of construction if the applicant had understood that it was necessary. 6. That the arantinq of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the district involved. Fences are permitted in all land use districts. THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT ALLOW ANY CONSTRUCTION TO BEGIN. Zoning compliance and/or a building permit must first be obtained. Please contact this office for further details. Ah appeal of this decision may be initiated by any person or party aggrieVed by filing a written notice of appeal with the City Clerk within ten days of the date of the Commission's decision. The notice of appeal must state the specific grounds for the appeal. Therefore, the Commission's decision will not be final and effective until ten days following the decision. Failure to utilize this variance within 12 months after its effective date shall cause its cancellation. Please bring this letter when you come to our office to obtain zoning compliance for any construction on the lot. If you have any questions about the action of the Commission, please contact Duane Dvorak of the Community Development Department. Sincerely, Patricia Miley, Se r tary Community Developmen Department exception granted by the Commission per Case 88 -020. The placement of a jail addition in the PL -- Public Use Lands Zoning District is a permitted conditional use which was approved by the Commission per Case 87 -024. F) Case 88 -048. Request for an exception from Section 17.21.020 (Permitted Uses) of the Borough Code to permit a shelter for the homeless to locate in a B -- Business Zoning District on Lot 2, Block 17, New Kodiak Subdivision; 210 Mill Bay Road. (City of Kodiak) DUANE DVORAK indicated 37 public hearing notices were mailed for this case and 3 were returned, opposing this request. Staff recommended the Commission hold a public hearing, and following the public hearing take no action on this request as the applicant had requested, in writing, that the case be withdrawn. CHAIRMAN RENNELL noted that a public hearing would be held, but that the Commission would take no action due to the fact that the applicant had requested that this case be withdrawn. Regular Session Closed. Public Hearing Opened: Seeing and hearing none. Public Hearing Closed. Regular Session Opened. G) Case 88 -049. Request for a variance from Section 17.54.010(A and C) of the Borough Code to permit a four (4) foot fence to project thirty -five (35) feet (to the sidewalk) into the Rezanof Drive Right -of -Way in a R1-- Single - Family Residential Zoning District. Lot 4, Block 56, East Addition; 1813 Rezanof Drive East. (Charles and Connie Johnson) DUANE DVORAK indicated 35 public hearing notices were mailed for this case and 2 were returned, expressing non - objection to this request. Staff recommended approval of this request. A discussion ensued among the Commissioners, with input from Community Development Department staff, regarding the fence's construction status. Regular Session Closed. Public Hearing Opened: Seeing and hearing none. Public Hearing Closed. Regular Session Opened. COMMISSIONER KNUDSEN MOVED TO GRANT a request for a variance from Section 17.54.010(A) of the Borough Code to permit a four (4) foot fence to project thirty -five (35) feet (to the sidewalk) into the Rezanof Street right -of -way in an R1-- Single Family Residential Zoning District, subject to the conditions of approval contained in the staff report dated August 4, 1988 and to adopt the findings contained in the staff report dated August 4, 1988 as "Findings of Fact" for this case. The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll call vote. Page 14 of 27 P &Z Minutes: August 17, 1988 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAIi 1. The fence is constructed at the applicant's sole expense. 2. The applicant assumes any liability associated with said fence on State -owned property. 3. If at a future date the State determines that the fence must be removed from State -owned property, the applicant or any subsequent owner of Lot 4, Block 56, East Addition, agrees to remove same without cost to the State. 4. Since the land is publicly owned, no prescriptive right accrues to the user. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Exceptional physical circumstances or condition& applicable to the property or intended use of development. which generally do not apply to other properties in the same land use district. The exceptional condition applicable to the intended use of the property is largely a perceptual one. Typically, the average property owner assumes that all the land out to the sidewalk or roadway edge is their "yard," and that they should be able to erect a fence of any height around that yard. In addition, if the fence was built along the property lines, strips of State property would remain outside the fence. It is possible that this property would not then be maintained by the property owner. 2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships. Strict application of the zoning ordinance would only allow the fence to be placed on the property lines. This is an unnecessary hardship when many other fences in the community have encroached on the public property without first receiving a variance. The Commission has also granted variances in the past for fences to project into road rights -of -way. 3. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health. safety and welfare. Granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public's health, safety or welfare' because the fence does not pose a line of site problem along Rezanof Street. Also, the conditions outlined below ensure that any future removal of the fence will not impose a cost to the public. The erection of the fence into the right -of -way will hopefully ensure that the small strip of State property is maintained by the adjacent property owner to the benefit of the Public. 4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan identifies this area for Medium Density Residential development. Fences and other Page 15 of 27 P &Z Minutes: August 17, 1968 minor structural developments are not addressed in the Comprehensive Plan. 5. That actions of the applicant did not cause .special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is beina sought by the variance. In this instance, actions of the applicant have caused the conditions from which relief is being sought by variance. This is due to the fact that fence construction began prior to the granting of the variance. However, staff believes that the variance would have been requested prior to the initiation of construction if the applicant had understood that it was necessary. 6. That the granting of the variance will not Permit a prohibited land use in the district involved. Fences are permitted in all land use districts. H) Case 88-050. Request for a variance from Section 17.18.050(A) (Yards) of the Borough Code to permit the construction of a covered deck that encroaches eight (8) feet into the required eighteen (18) foot front yard setback in a R1--Single-Family Residential Zoning District. Lot 24, Block 12, Aleutian Homes Subdivision; 716 Willow Street. (Wilfredo Cabudol) DUANE DVORAK indicated 62 public hearing notices were mailed for this case and none were returned. Staff recommended approval of this request. Regular Session Closed. Public Hearing Opened: Seeing and hearing none. Public Hearing Closed. Regular Session Opened. COMMISSIONER THOMPSON MOVED TO GRANT a request for a variance from Section 17.18.050 of the Borough Code to . permit a thirty by eight (30 x 8) foot covered deck addition onto the existing single family residence to encroach four (4) feet into the required fourteen (14) foot front yard setback in an R1--Single-Family Residential Zoning District on Lot 24, Block 12, Aleutian Homes Subdivision; and to adopt the findings contained in the staff report dated August 9, 1988, as "Findings of Fact" for this case. The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll call vote. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the Property or intended use of development, which generally do not apply to other properties in the same land use district. In this case the exceptional physical condition is the placement of the existing structure on the lot, 18 feet from the Willow Street right-of-way. Any addition of a covered deck will require a variance. The house was built in 1951 and during this time covered decks were not typically included on the buildings that make up this subdivision. In addition, buildings were not sited in such a manner as to allow for any additions without encroaching into the required setbacks. Page 16 of 27 P&Z Minutes: August 17, 1988 Kodiak Island Borough Charles and Connie Johnson 1813 Rezanof Drive East Kodiak, Alaska 99615 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 August 12, 1988 RE: Case 88-049. Request for .a variance from Section 17.54.010(A and C) of the Borough Code to permit a four (4) foot fence to project thirty-five (35) feet (to the sidewalk) into the Rezanof Drive Right-of-Way in a R1--Single-Family Residential Zoning District. Lot 4, Block 56, East Addition; 1813 Rezanof Drive East. (Charles and Connie Johnson) Dear Mr. and Ms. Johnson: Enclosed please find a copy of the materials, concerning the above referenced item, reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission at their regularly scheduled packet review worksession held Wednesday, August 10, 1988. If you have any questions or comments, please contact the Community Development Department at 486-5736, extension 255. Sincerely, Patricia Miley, Secretary Community Development Department enclosures Kodiak Island Borough M E M O R A N D U M DATE: August 9, 1988 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Community Development Department SUBJECT: Information for the August 17, 1988 Regular Meeting 4�J ITEM VI -G RE: Case 88 -049. Request for a variance from Section 17.54.010(A and C) of the Borough Code to permit a four (4) foot fence to project thirty -five (35) feet (to the sidewalk) into the Rezanof Drive Right -of -Way in a R1 -- Single - Family Residential Zoning District. Lot 4, Block 56, East Addition; 1813 Rezanof Drive East. (Charles and Connie Johnson) Thirty -five (35) public hearing notices were distributed on July 29, 1988. Date of site visit: August 3, 1988 1. Applicant: Charles and Connie Johnson 2. Land Owner: Same. 3. Request: For a variance from Section 17.54.010(A and C) of the Borough Code to permit a four (4) foot fence to project thirty -five (35) feet (to the sidewalk) into the Rezanof Drive Right -of -Way in a R1 -- Single - Family Residential Zoning District. 4. Existing Zoning: 5. Zoning History: 6. Location: Physical: Legal: 7. Lot Size: R1 -- Single- Family Residential Zoning District The 1968 Comprehensive Plan identifies this area as Residential -R1. Departmental Files indicate no further activity. 1813 Rezanof Drive East Lot 4, Block 56, East Addition 6,000 square feet 8. Existing Land Use: Single- family residential Case 88 -049 1 of 5 P &Z: August 17, 1988 ITEM VI -G 9. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North: Lot 7, Block 56, East Addition Use: Single-family residence Zoning: RI—Single-Family Residential South: Lots 3 and 4, Block 55, East Addition Use: Single-family residence Zoning: R1--Single-Family Residential East: Lot 3, Block 56, East Addition Use: Single-family residence Zoning: R1--Single-Family Residential West: Lot 5, Block 56, East Addition Use: Single-family residence Zoning: R1--Single-Family Residential 10. Comprehensive Plan: The 1968 Comprehensive Plan depicts this area for Medium Density Residential Development. 11. Applicable Regulations: The following sections of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Borough Code are applicable to this request: 17.54.010 Height—Extension onto public property. Fences and walls not exceeding six feet in height may occupy any portion of a side or rear yard in any R district, provided that where such fence or wall projects beyond the front yard line or setback line toward the front property line, the following further restrictions shall apply: C. No fence, wall or hedge shall be erected or maintained on the public property beyond the front property line of any lot or parcel of land, except masonry or concrete retain- ing walls, and then only to a height not to exceed six inches above the grade of the earth such wall is constructed to retain. A permit shall first be secured from the building official approving the necessity for and type of such retaining wall. COASTAL MANAGEMENT APPLICABLE POLICIES Residential Development 1. Location In areas with poorly draining soils, development where feasible shall be connected to a sewer line. Where this is not feasible, onsite facilities shall be designed so as Case 88-049 2 of 5 P&Z: August 17, 1988 ITEM VI -G not to cause conditions that will pollute rivers, lakes, and other water bodies, including the ground water supply. Consistent: Yes. The lot is served by public sewer. 2. Open Space Green areas and open space shall be retained to the maximum extent feasible and prudent when land is subdivided. Consistent: Not applicable. This action does not involve land subdivision. 3. Access New subdivisions or other residential developments on the shoreline shall provide usable public access to and along the shoreline, extending the length of the development, to the extent feasible and prudent. Consistent: Not applicable. This lot is not located along the shoreline. 4. Hazardous Lands Development shall not occur in hazardous areas such as avalanche runout zones, active floodplains, and high water channels to the extent feasible and prudent. Siting, design, and construction measures to minimize exposure to coastal erosion, mass wasting and historic tsunami run -up shall be required to the extent feasible and prudent. Consistent: Not applicable. This lot is not located in a "hazardous" area. 5. Wetlands Filling and drainage of water bodies, floodways, backshores, and natural wetlands shall be consistent with ACMP Standards 6 AAC 80.070 (Energy Facilities) and 6 AAC 80.130 (Habitats). Consistent: Not applicable. This action does not involve any filling or drainage activities. COMMENTS: The purpose of this. request is to permit a four (4) foot fence to project into the Rezanof Street right -of -way. Fences are not permitted to extend onto public property, hence this request. Case 88 -049 3 of 5 P &Z: August 17, 1988 ITEM VI -G In order for the Commission to grant a variance, all of the following conditions must be satisfied: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or intended use of development, which generally do not apply to other properties in the same land use district. The exceptional condition applicable to the intended use of the property is largely a perceptual one. Typically, the average property owner .assumes that all the land out to the sidewalk or roadway edge is their "yard," and that they should be able to erect a fence of any height around that yard. In addition, if the fence was built along the property lines, strips of State property would remain outside the fence. It is possible that this property would not then be maintained by the property owner. 2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships. Strict application of the zoning ordinance would only allow the fence to be placed on the property lines. This is an unnecessary hardship when many other fences in the community have encroached on the public property without first receiving a variance. The Commission has also granted variances in the past for fences to project into road rights-of-way. 3. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or pre1udice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare. Granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public's health, safety or welfare because the fence does not pose a line of site problem along Rezanof Street. Also, the conditions outlined below ensure that any future removal of the fence will not impose a cost to the public. The erection of the fence into the right-of-way will hopefully ensure that the small strip of State property is maintained by the adjacent property owner to the benefit of the Public. 4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan identifies this area for Medium Density Residential development. Fences and other minor structural developments are not addressed in the Comprehensive Plan. Case 88-049 4 of 5 P&Z: August 17, 1988 ITEM VI -G 5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance. In this instance, actions of the applicant have caused the conditions from which relief is being sought by variance. This is due to the fact that fence construction began prior to the granting of the variance. However, staff believes that the variance would have been requested prior to the initiation of construction if the applicant had understood that it was necessary. 6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the district involved. Fences are permitted in all land use districts. RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds that this request does meet all the conditions necessary for a variance to be granted under Chapter 17.66 (Variance) of the Borough Code. APPROPRIATE MOTION: Should the Commission agree with the staff recommendation, the appropriate motion is: Move to grant a request for a variance from Section 17.54.010(A) of the Borough Code to permit a four (4) foot fence to project thirty -five (35) feet (to the sidewalk) into the Rezanof Street right -of -way in an R1-- Single Family Residential Zoning District, subject to the conditions of approval contained in the staff report dated August 4, 1988 and to adopt the findings contained in the staff report dated August 4, 1988 as "Findings of Fact" for this case. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The fence is constructed at the applicant's sole expense. 2. The applicant assumes any liability associated with said fence on State -owned property. 3. If at a future date the State determines that the fence must be removed from State -owned property, the applicant or any subsequent owner of Lot 4, Block 56, East Addition, agrees to remove same without cost to the State. 4. Since the land is-publicly owned, no prescriptive right accrues to the user. Case 88 -049 5 of 5 P &Z: August 17, 1988 • 11.1 Ft 11E412 • • a a a 4 a 0 • 11 • V :314;. crS 6 • Pk p • *.i43 • "—a ,4454'" !" a 4 y R 0 • o • •2' 1,1)__ • • 0 A Cs • • •-• 4 a • D• I 9 9 • • • o . AR 4.0 '4 ^ 3-11rRiti 0 • *** ' 1. .4- 14. - 1.121 f,Fthetir . . . . • S tME ONOF 7 /:‘,/,\•,...\•-•,-1,,,, =Ma El NOF A V E ;wet RUSSEL EST ,--.°41'9 Lot 4 Block. 56 East Add. wirdelit : . THIRD 4001 1813 Rezanof Drive East N/10‘1) Charles .& Connie Johnson LILLY LAKE R=325' • AIRPARK 'SUBOINASION , • • • . RCA() , Po* ms14, 60015Mit • A jijjj STREE Tw otx NOF ERNIE 1111111 A L•0 V t- (1) 2 ;111.-LLC3 z z DRIVE S TR T 4 w A.1 1 Mau M 5kNo .8- • o 4 4 0 • 0 •-• e. L. • v, 4 t. Wel/DIVI6K,N6 • • • o p 49 • 1,4 :.T.A4er • ^ • , . • • '.„"„.1,; • • , I0 • • p4 4 ,` 4'1 • • • " C • 0 0 J./t.0 4.• • 4 • 44 on ota, 4 • '4 la ,49•• 90 • • • 4 4 A • • 644 • A • • • > • • \ \ , S I MEONOFF NEM ?MOM oismic Ems w z • 0 • 4 • • t• a 9 • • 9 • • .. ; 4 • I• 4.44 414 Arg 0,4 4A••• 4000 4. • I Iv L L .9 • • • 4 1, V. IN • t Yf o CHICHENOF S • • • rEMPACIF MINN' A o • 1 • • „RE.tDENTIAL__R-1 RP,PE,.$111!L RESIDENTIAL R-3 ,ftuRAL'RE,tipc1411' BUSINESS • INoUSTRIAL.,/ CONSERVATION IC USE LAI OTERVaP: *1•'°•*: u. 0 • tlIforritO dro, / SIJRVEY 2.739 -A • • • • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC FACILITIES 1500 Anton Larsen Road Kodiak, AK 99615 4874952 August 2, 1988 Mr. Dodd Shy P.O. Box 2913 Kodiak, AK 99615 Dear Mr. Shy: RECEIVED AUG 8 1Vt5d COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. STEVE COWPER, GOVERNOR CENTRAL REGION 4111 AVIATION AVENUE P.O. BOX 196900 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99519-6900 TELEX: 25-185 The State does not have-any objection to the construction of the fence on Lot 4 Block 56 U.S. Survey 2538-8-East. The fence should be built in accordance.,with-theicity variance codes. William C. Mowl Transportation Maintenance Superintendent WM/amc KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH 'COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTM 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 99615 ITEM VI-G PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE A public hearing will be held on Wednesday. August 17, 1988. The meeting will begin at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska, before the Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission, to hear comments, if any, on the following request: Case 88-049. Request for a variance from Section 17.54.010(A and C) of the Borough Code to permit a four (4) foot fence'to project thirty-five (35) feet (to the sidewalk).into the_ Residential Zoning District. Lot 4, Block 56, East Addition; 1813 Rezanof Drive East.. 441)— (Charles and Connie Johnson) .06 eb 0. AP 410 If you do not wish to testify verbally, you may provide your comments in the space below, or in a letter to the Community Development DepartMent prior to the meeting. You are being notified because you are a property owner in the area of the request. If you have any questions about the request, please call us at 486-5736, extension 255. Your Name: Me/A7/,,,, A/. soL4A-e_ Mailing Address: , X 3 _5%1 k 044. k Your property description: d'r 47L,c4- „574, - -7 - Comments: c77:0- , I. wrie09 1 . 4• . j Aa {T ..:r'? n RUSSEL S'°' R Case 88 -049 Lot 4 Block 56iveEssAdd. THIRD App' Charles & Connie Johnson ILLY LAKE • L p0RK SUBIDN R 325' M ILL t3 N • •.4. 4 • ql•"" r2•t . • • 4,.4';•4 • 4 • • s ■ • • • • i • • • • �` ' et 4ei ► • t • • • • • • • • • 4 • 44. • .1/ • .. w•_�P CrI1C -REND • • ZONING KE` - n • ` � • • • � : •' • RESatilvor I A• a l` A'.. �. \• tMEC '4CF7 r\. /•0;� j'�� -\ \ `/i\/ / f t Z/ iiii:° S'e+EG Tu.; A RANOF AV NOMIE EZssANNOFF ® A AMMO M 4 "110 ia41/ MMEN MEM REST /,, / INDUSTRIAL CossRVATt PUeoC USE WATER DRI VE AI L O V STR / US SURVEY _ 0739 Kfn et ...... KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTM7 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 99615 ITEM VI•G PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE A public hearing will be held on- Wednesday, August 17, 1988. The meeting will begin--at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 710T;. Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska, before the Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission, to hear comments, if any, on the following request: Case 88-049. • Request for a variance from Section 17.54.010(A and C) of the:Borough Code to permit a four .(4) foot fence to project thirty-five (35) feet (to the sidewalk) _into_ t_be___Rezanof--Drive Right-of-Way--in- a • R1--Single-Family Residential Zoning District. Lot 4, Block 56, East Addition; 1813 Rezanof Drive East. (Charles and Connie Johnson) ECEIVED AUG 219 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. If you do not wish to testify verbally, you may provide your comments in the space below, or in a letter to the Community Development Department prior to the meeting. You are being notified because you are a property owner in the area of the request. If you have any questions about the request, please call us at 486-5736, extension 255. Your Name: 3(26-cla----P\ Mailing Address: CP .o.T> 7 Your property descriptions . Comments : 0 r 219 Unlaw • • I? ARCH • • 4 a. fil • *4 .• e • • . ,tsr.,16 A 41..4431.1. :4;;,... 4 0. • •I4, it, !I ia• 4, • 4 • • a A. R '0 A • • • • 6„. ,24k A -L._ gL• ■74W*".....6:.• 741 .! kl 114144..1-.• .,!....A.RRE4 iqq1411)acV:wel •aA•tfi40.,:`P. •:. ' : ..• - LILLY Rl ...e.Wse-ac ,---- . _ ES _cAs2___..---88-049 Lo_3„.,----t 4- BloP_aatAdd• liW itezanof Drive East ADD Charles & Connie Johnson >,1 • ,. 11:=325' 0 14 1 4 * *OD. RUSSEL THIRD LAKE oc, s M L L StMEONOF" \7%\7/ V/ s/ C i ' e • .... e s. ‘ .... • \ ... .... /1 Is.-// Calli l'......1V+/V■i\Z MOM • .1 ZONING KE1 • RESIDEti11A6 I REsournAL RESIDEWIAL 8 RURAL REBBA 1)■1I-‘ BUSINESS CrllrEN3r ARANOF '71 r A V JUDIE 311111U E ZANOF illiilla S I MEONOFF 01741: alL1,1§ NDUSTRIAL.' CONSERVATI1 puELIC USC, INATERSKE0 DR 1 V E MIME 1110 A .0 V STR claw ,.\ iter.101 ..rua %la :11V. • • • US SURVEY 273 Kodiak IslandBorough Charles and Connie Johnson 1813 Rezanof Drive East Kodiak, Alaska 99615 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 -6340 PHONE (907) 486 -5736 July 29, 1988 RE: Case 88 -049. Request for a variance from Section 17.54.010(A and C) of the Borough Code to permit a four (4) foot fence to project thirty -five (35) feet (to the sidewalk) into the Rezanof Drive Right -of -Way in a R1 -- Single- Family Residential Zoning District. Lot 4, Block 56, East Addition; 1813 Rezanof Drive East. (Charles and Connie Johnson) Dear Mr. and Ms. Johnson: Please be advised that the above - referenced request has been scheduled for review and action by the Planning and Zoning Commission at their August 17, 1988 regular meeting. This meeting will begin at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska. Attendance at this meeting is recommended. The week prior to the regular meeting, on Wednesday, August 10, 1988, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough conference room, the Commission will hold a worksession to review the packet material for the regular meeting. You are invited to attend this worksession in order to respond to any questions the Commission may have regarding this request. If you have any questions, please call the Community Development Department at 486 -5736, extension 255. Sincerely, Patricia Miley, Secretary Community Development Department NUOii‘K I.LAID ORCUGH 7 a POST OFFICE BOX 1246 KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 ( ) Conditional Use Permit .( ) Exception 41 Variance ( ) Zoning Change: From: To: CODE SECTION INVOLVED: LO 0 Cc. NOTE: The application fee for all items covered by this form is $50. Conditional Use Permits, Exceptions, and Variance Applications also require the submission of a site plan. APPLICANT: cDr\cuo.A_Ik.k. Name &:•- IR ao Home Telephone ' Address Work Telephone 81.4AZ... 01.0-43420 - ke k City, State, Zip PROPERTY: , _a7c qec-1-)1 EL2.9 , 8h, Lot Block Subdivision Name United States Survey 4 Section, Township, Range, S.M. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY: ZE-;■‘ ( PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY: 0Jaia ?SJC4 4b I have been advised of the procedur2s ivol•ea with this request and have received a copy of the appropriate res.ulaticns. Authorit. Acent Data Application Accepteu: Pert . Owner Date CASH RECEIPT ..adiak Island Borough `~"1 3 5 3 710 UPPER MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 996154340 PHONE (907) 486 -5736 -000- 101 -10 -00 010 -000- 105 -01 -00 010 000 - 105 -06 -00 010- 000 -111 -61 -00 010 -000- 107- 040- 000 -371 - 11 -00 040 -000- 371 - 12 - 00 010- 000 - 368 -51 -00 010 -000- 322 -11 -00 010 -000 -319- 10 -00 010 - 000 - 199 -99 -00 DATE PROPERTY TAX, REAL PROPERTY TAX, PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX, LIENS PERSONAL. TAX, LIENS LAND SALE, PRINCIPAL LAND SALE, INTEREST SALE OF COPIES BUILDING PERMIT PER ATTACHED ow - .A -/6 CONDITIONS OF CHECK PAYMENTS PAYMENTS TENDERED BY CHECK FOR OBLIGATIONS DUE TO THE BOROUGH ARE SATISFIED ONLY UPON THE CHECK BEING HONORED. RETURNED CHECKS FOR ANY REASON RESTORES THE OBLIGATION AS UNPAID AND SUBJECTS THE PAYER TO ANY CHARGES, FEES OR OTHER LEGAL LIABILITIES AS MAY BE APPLICABLE. TOTAL CASHIER PAYOR ,,.,� 7i. . 1 f PIC i3 " do PAYMENT MAD£ BY: La'CHECK NO .'531_1 ❑ CASH ❑ OTHER FM08- 511015 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH -\ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEM 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 99615 ITEM VI -G PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE A public hearing will be held on Wednesday, August 17, 1988. The meeting will begin at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 710. Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska, before the Kodiak' Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission, to hear comments, if any, on the following request: Case 88 -049. Request for a variance from Section 17.54.010(A and C) of the Borough Code to permit a four. (4) foot fence to project thirty -five (35) feet (to the sidewalk) into the Rezanof Drive Right -of -Way in a R1-- Single - Family. Residential Zoning District. Lot 4, Block 56, East Addition; 1813' - Rezanof Drive East. (Charles and Connie Johnson) If you do 'not wish to testify verbally, you may provide your comments in the space below, or in a letter to theCommunity Development Department prior to the meeting. - You 'are being notified because. you are a,property owner in the area of the request. If you have any questions about the request, please call us at 486 -5736, extension 255. Your Name: Mailing Address: Your property description: Comments: • • .4161•••••■.-- • .7.a. I. ... f. .. _ RUSSEL ES . 88-049 Lot BlP----ast Add. • • *?•*. THIRD ADD zataof Drive East Charles & Connie Johnson LILLY LAKE F-' SAPARK SUSENVISION R325 te„ 0 A t rvl L L 1.2 C • v • • • 1441, * 4' b41 *I• 4 4 • • • • --BAY 0 A • • • : 61 4 • • • 1. • • • • • -I. • 4 • a a a a „,.. • •4 .. • • . N .! M 4Et, . 2....1..-, ........ • • , 9 . t .. .. ,A,..f.C., 4 btiba"4/SVPIT • . • • • I, . • 4 • 4 • 41 ..§,a1., , .. ... •,. : ,- • ,a. .. .11......... ,.., . .. • NOM zqt■uNq KE' REsuAtoim, 1 REspEtattu. RESIDEPOW. RURAL. RESDI BUSINESS INDUSTRIAL CONSERIATI puBLAC USE wATE.Rstet CHIC.r4ENDr S t'M E ONC;F / W.) •,...\\■‘'':.\**At. • / / • ■le.• TW " A 11A N °F A V L 1111111O E ZANOF S1MEONOFF emehmai -mow Al t.• 0 v STR 01)ingfai \74-17iti"4.' 12ENANMIZ It'ost ten". ta cr oag• o' FAVID137:1 !kit US SURVEY 2739 Kodiak Island Borough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 0/, icy e", , „ f, . ; ft) ROUNSIVILL Et SARAH Pap:N-440X 547 KODIAK c-J R 112 D.:§ :60090 K A K (9 '615 v RECEIVE AUG 8 1;)ocs COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. I \ 2 5 6 7 8 9 12 13 14 15 16 17 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 2E 29 30 31 32 3 3 3 37 38 39 40 41 42 4 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 52 53 54 55 56 57 R1120540030 CARL £ ELLEN P.O. BOX 1655 KODIAK AK 99615 U120540040 CROWE, DAVID & VIRGINIA P.O. BOX 3372 AK 99_6.15 R1120540120 SMEDLEY I DENNI S & PATRICIA 1718 SIMEONDF .K0DIA. .AK96:15 - R11205401. FREEMAN, DUANE & NANCY P.O. BOX 912 KODIAK A.K 9.615 R1120540140 MOWL WILLIAM & DEBRA P00* BOX 1211 KODIAK AK 99615 R1120540150 WESTERN ALASKA FISHERIES 111.1 3RD AVE SUITE 1210 SEATTLE WA 98101 WITHROW/JUERGENS 9 BRINGGOLD 60 1818 EAST REZANOF DR KODIAK AK 99615 R1120550010 g/gI P4- Fc o,1-61 3s" 6 R1120550030 NUTTALL,MICHAEL J C MARY 2 P.O. BOX 2032 KODIAK AK 99615 s 6 81120550050 EGGEMEYER,JAMES E MARLYSS P.O. BOX 965 KODIAK AK 99615 R1120550060. POWELL,RICHARD H & KANDI P.O. BOX 2074 KODIAK AK 99615 R1120550080 KNOWIES,R1CHARD /MARGARET 202 REZANO E DRIVE KODIAK AK 99615 R1120560010 MAJOR,JAMES E C SHARON P.O. BOX 532 KODIAK AK 99615 SOULE,MARION P.O. .3OX 352 KODIAK R1120560020 AK 99615 R1120560030 JOHNSON,DONALD C PENELOPE P.O.. BOX 3753 KODIAK AK 99615 R112Q5¢QQ4Q 6 1 2 jaRN t , t'HAKIri ANN E P.O. BOX 813 KODIAK AK 99615 5 1120560050 ENGEL,CARSON L P.O. BOX 352 KODIAK AK 99615 R1120560060 VI NBERG, ©O?NAL•:C P.O. BOX 1813 KODIAK AK 99615:. LLAVE,ANGELITO & ADELAIDA P•O• BOX 786 USCG KODIAK AK 99619 $LACK$JRN'sJAM1ES P.O. `BOX .:2298 KODIAK K 9.9615 R 11.2 056+0090 ROUNSAVILLE,SARAH K P.D. BOX 547 KODIAK AK 99615 R1120560100 GIBBENS,ERNEST S £LINDA P.D.. BOX 94 ANT AK AK 99557 1 • 6 1 2 3 R1120570020 4 PILLANS,GARY P C JUDY L 5 1817 SIMEONOFF S:T 6 KODIAK AK 99615 9 10 11 12 13 14 17 10 19 20 21 81120570040 22 REID,DANA M £ SUSAN J 23 1813 STMEONOFF 24 � KODIAK AK.. 99615 81.120570030 BOUDREAU9A F & YVONNE P.O. BOX 3334 KODIAK AK 99615 28 29 30 R11205.70050 31 ANICIETE,RAYMUNDO 32 ANICIETE,FELISA 32 1811 SIMEON_OFF ST 34 KODIAK - AK 99615 35 36 37 30 59 _ R1120570060 40 : CRATTY,ALFREDE FLORENCE 41 1810 CHICHENDFF 42 . KODIAK AK 99615 R1120570070 49 GOTT,DONALD W ° NCR 73 BOX 2528 51 DOG PATCH AR 72648 R1120570080 "LHAPMAN,JAMES ' E DOROTHY 1814 CHICHENOFF . . KODIAK . AK 99615 . 6 3 7 R11205_7_00_9_0 STILL,MICnaEL 5 GENEVIEVE' P.O. BOX 2908 KOD.IAK 996 5 a 9 R1.120570100 10 LDEWEI,WALTER . E CATHERINE P.O. BOX .4204 12 Kt3DLk 4:i( "99615 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23. 24 25 R1433_0/0010 FRONTIER BAPTIST CHURCH P.O. BOX 392 KODIAK AK 99615 26 27 28 29 30 32 33 37 38 39 40 41 42 R1436010010 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH KIB 11 710 MILL BAY RD .. "979615:- AK 45 46 8,11205300;10 4r KODIAK 'CITY OF 48 P•O. BOX 1397 49. KODIAK AK 99615 50 sr' 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 NEL SON',S EtDON $OX 30'2 KODIAK :r A*1") PS30 01 D \1-L DS DIa IIZ OS4/o 0 c� RtIZ 2 o P-a >S� oSSO L IQ_ DS Co Its OS-3-0 ► 00 us @ 43 so_ r o o I o_ ', 1"-%3 tp0 1 0 030 „ \ • X:11 . ... ....... • . 'D t. „.. • - • ? a:A: ow_ 10 a Aa, RUSSEL EST* 88-049 Lot 4 Block 56 East Add. g ?•• 1813 Rezanof Drive East THIRD ADD Charles & Connie Johnson R=325' 7, f. t -R C. A D I CL • R 0 A ° °I.4° 44D 9., c4 p 4 • 4 - 0 4 4 r> 0 " • 4 t e ••• ,4 4 4 M 9V* t. 4 vvcc.:6f4, • . 4 e a a " " 4 .414 CHrHENOF si\ -\ SME00F 7 - / /\ VariP /•/ / / \/1 z INERE Mitdassigi 'simin NOF A V .,,TREETUJ SIMEONOFF , ' '0. ,:.' 4 • v, 7 4 A r 7 e V . MA-4204 • .. • .. • / ----"-, \ - / • -.), \ . \ / \ , \ / -"-- r - . - --, ..... „ ..> „ ... ..../ ,, / \ "/ \ '/ - ‘'''/ /...- / ), N - / \,- ... - . ...- ....- `/",;\ / ...... / ......, / \ - ZONING _ Rtslop#14.L RESIDENTIAL R-Z RESIDENTIAL, RURAL- RESIDENT( A BUSINESS- • , INDUSTRIAL.; • •.:CONSERNiATIDN'',. Fut:pc upc, LAq WATERSHED'. NOF DRIVE " • • ' / US SURVEY 0739 • Kodiak Island Borough Community Development Department ZONING COMPLIANCE PERMIT 1. Property Owner/Applicant ..-/C)ti Name. Zoning Compliance #: 3. Legal Description of Property Mailing address: --czfr Telephone ft- 2. Zoning Requirements for New Co t ction - Description o oposed Action (attach site plan) Use of proposed structur- s). Road access for emergency yehibles: Yes (contact Fire Chief for confirmation) No Date Water supply adequate for public use, institutional use, commercial, and residential ;tructures larger than a triplex: Yes No Date k contact Fire Chief for confirmation) Lot area: t. TI> Lot width. e5:31 Rear: Right Minimum setbacks - Front: Sides - Left: Maximum building height. Maximum lot coverage: Number and size of parking spaces e bired• — Off-street loading requirement: Plat related requirements: 12-E9J 1q =r/U.-/P--.4-- ( 2- la-Aur ff,e Other (e.g. zero lot line, additional setbacks, c o)gs into yards, screening, etc.): t1-.'54r CAC). A .z-LD ‘==3 1-5tz,r- 41-1,121 rr .s16- Wt--c- cE isr A-Fa-2:LE -76c tfiT: C-tos TD 1::?-13-K__ Street address 1c) 1-b Lot, Block, Subdivision LL. - p Survey, other (e.g. Township/Range): Tax Code IP I 2 C'sgeiii)- 40 4. Description of Existing Property Zoning: Minimum Area:Th Minimum Lot Width' OCD1 Use and size of existing buildings on the lot' SF-0-- r (--T-Hr-kfzr---- 5. Consistency with Coastal Management Program Applicable policies - Residential: Business: Other Proposed action consistent with Borough Coastal Management Program - Yes: No Industrial. If proposed action conflicts with Coastal Management Program policies, attach a sheet that notes the policy(ies), describes the conflict(s), and notes the condition(s) attaXci to the consistency approval to mitigate these conflicts. Attachment - Yes No 6. Applicant Certification I hereby certify that I will comply with all provisions of the Kodiak Island Borough Code and that I have the authority to certify this as owner, or representative of the owner, of the property involved. I agree to have corner markers in place for verification of setbacks. Signed- Owner: k-"\M Date 22, ViSe Other Support Documents Attached - Site Plan: f +e- `Pci- 2 ea-ill viicz 0 ,11 ukr 0 As Built Survey: 16,0 ev,..cia, 7. Borough Staff Approv ) Signed: Title: Date' THIS FORM DOES NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION WHEN A BUILDING PERMIT IS REQUIRED Distribution: White to File - Yellow to Building Official - Pink to Applicant Kodiak Island Borough Community Development Department 710 Mill Bay Road (Room 204), Kodiak, Alaska 99615-6340. Phone (907) 486-5736, extension 255. July 1, 1988