Loading...
EAST ADD BK 57 LT 3 - VarianceAl Boudreau Box 3334 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Kodiak IslandBorough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615.6340 PHONE (907) 486 -5736 April 16, 1987 RE: CASE 87 -015. Request for a variance from Section 1,7.54.010(C) (Height- Extension onto Public Property) of the Borough Code to permit a fence that complies with all other code provisions to project into the Simeonoff Street right -of -way in a R1-- Single - Family Residential Zoning District. Lot 3, Block 57, East Addition; 1815 Simeonoff Street. Dear Mr. Boudreau: The Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting on April 15, 1987, granted your request for the variance cited above subject to the following conditions of approval: 1. The fence is constructed at the applicant's sole expense. 2. The applicant assumes any liability associated with said fence on City -owned property. 3. If at a future date the City determines that the fence must be removed from the City -owned property, the applicant or any subsequent owner of Lot 3, Block 57, East Addition, agrees to remove same without cost to the City. 4. Since the land is publicly owned, no prescriptive right accrues to the user. 5. Construction of the fence shall be in such a manner as to not reduce any required off - street parking. The Commission also adopted the following findings of fact in support of their decision: 1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or intended use of development, which generally do not apply to other properties in the same land use district. The exceptional condition applicable to the intended use of the property is largely a perceptual one. Typically, the average property owner assumes that all the land out to the sidewalk or roadway edge is their "yard," and that they should be able to erect a fence of reasonable height around that yard. In addition, if the fence was built along the property lines, strips of City property would remain outside the fence. It is likely that this property Al Boudreau April 16, 1987 Page Two Kodiak Island Borough would not then be maintained by the property owner, this could constitute a public health problem. 2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships. Strict application of the zoning ordinance would only allow the fence to be placed on the property line. This is an unnecessary hardship when many other fences in the community have encroached on public property without first receiving a variance. The Commission has also granted variances in the past for fences to project into road rights -of -way. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare. Granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public's health, safety or welfare because the fence will not pose a line of sight visibility problem along Simeonoff Street. Also, the conditions outlined below ensure that any future removal of the fence will not impose a cost to the public. The erection of the fence out to the sidewalk will hopefully ensure that the small strip of City property is maintained by the property owner to the benefit of the City. 4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Granting of this variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan does not address minor structural developments such as fences. The main use of the property for residential purposes is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance. Actions of the applicant have not caused the conditions from which relief is being sought by a variance. The variance request will be decided prior to construction of the fence. 6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the district involved. Fences are permitted in all land use districts. Al Boudreau April 16, 1987 Page Three Kodiak Island Borough THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT ALLOW ANY CONSTRUCTION TO BEGIN.- You must first obtain zoning compliance and /or a building permit. Please contact this office for further details. An appeal of this decision may be initiated by any person or party aggrieved by filing a written notice of appeal with the City Clerk within ten days of the date of the Commission's decision. The notice of appeal must state the specific grounds for the appeal. Therefore, the Commission's decision will not be final and effective until ten days following the decision. Failure to utilize this variance within 12 months after its effective date shall cause its cancellation. Please bring this letter with you when you come to our office to obtain zoning compliance for any construction on your lot. If you have any questions about the action of the Commission, please contact me. Sincerely, Robert H. Pedersdn, Associate Planner Community Development Department 4. The "accessory building portion" of the new structure may be used for a home occupation by the residents of only one of the single - family residences. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the use as proposed in the application, or under appropriate conditions or restrictions, will not (A) endanger the public's health, safety or general welfare, (B) be inconsistent with the general purposes and intent of this title and (C) adversely impact other properties or uses in the neighborhood. A. The proposed use does not appear to endanger the public's health, safety or general welfare because the second dwelling unit will not increase the permitted density of the lot provided neither dwelling unit is converted to a duplex in the future. The R2 -- Two - Family Residential Zoning District does permit two - family dwellings (duplexes) and the potential use characteristics (e.g., parking, number of residents, utility demands, etc.) of two separate detached single - family residences are not substantially different from those of a two - family dwelling unit. B. The proposed use will be consistent with the general purposes and intent of Title 17 and with the specific description and intent of Chapter 17.19, the R2 - -Two- Family Residential Zoning District, because it will not generate other than normal vehicular traffic on nearby streets, and will not create requirements or costs for public services that cannot be systematically and adequately provided. C. The proposed use should not adversely impact other properties in the neighborhood because the structure containing the second dwelling unit must meet all UBC requirements for a dwelling unit, the structure will meet the same setbacks required for a main dwelling. The potential use characteristics will not be substantially different from those of a duplex. COMMISSIONER HEINRICHS returned to the Planning and Zoning Commission. CASE 87 -015. Request for a variance from Section 17.54.010(C) (Height - Extension onto Public Property) of the Borough Code to permit a fence that complies with all other code provisions to project into the Simeonoff Street right -of -way in a R1-- Single- Family Residential Zoning District. Lot 3, Block 57, East Addition; 1815 Simeonoff Street. (Al Boudreau) GORDON GOULD indicated 29 public hearing notices were mailed for this case and 1 was returned, expressing non - objection to this request. Staff recommended approval of this request, subject to five conditions. Regular Session Closed. Public Hearing Opened: AL BOUDREAU appeared before the Commission and expressed support for this request. A discussion ensued amongst the Commissioners and Mr. Boudreau concerning the conditions of approval. Public Hearing Closed. Regular Session Opened. COMMISSIONER KNUDSEN MOVED TO GRANT A request for a variance from Section 17.54.010 (C) of the Borough Code to permit a fence to P b Z MINUTES 11 APRIL 15, 1987 project into the Simeonoff Street right -of -way in a R1-- Single- Family Residential Zoning District on Lot 3, Block 57, East Addition, subject to the conditions of approval outlined in the staff report dated March 25, 1987 and to adopt the findings contained in the staff report as "Findings of Fact" for this case. The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll call vote. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The fence is constructed at the applicant's sole expense. 2. The applicant assumes any liability associated with said fence on City -owned property. 3. If at a future date the City determines that the fence must be removed from the City -owned property, the applicant or any subsequent owner of Lot 3, Block 57, East Addition, agrees to remove same without cost to the City. 4. Since the land is publicly owned, no prescriptive right accrues to the user. 5. Construction of the fence shall be in such a manner as to not reduce any required off - street parking. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or intended use of development, which generally do not apply to other properties in the same land use district. The exceptional condition applicable to the intended use of the property is largely a perceptual.one. Typically, the average property owner assumes that all the land out to the sidewalk or roadway edge is their "yard," and that they should be able to erect a fence of reasonable height around that yard. In addition, if the fence was built along the property lines, strips of City property would remain outside the fence. It is likely that this property would not then be maintained by the property owner, this could constitute a public health problem. 2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships. Strict application of the zoning ordinance would only allow the fence to be placed on the property line. This is an unnecessary hardship when many other fences in the community have encroached on public property without first receiving a variance. The Commission has also granted variances in the past for fences to project into road rights -of -way. 3. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare. Granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public's health, safety or welfare because the fence will not pose a line of sight visibility problem along Simeonoff Street. Also, the conditions outlined below ensure that any future removal of the fence will not impose a cost to the public. The erection of the fence out to the sidewalk will hopefully ensure that the small strip of City property is maintained by the property owner to the benefit of the City. 4. The granting objectives of of the variance will not be contrary to the the Comprehensive Plan. Granting of objectives of this variance will not be contrary to the the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan P & Z MINUTES 12 APRIL 15, 1987 does not address minor structural developments such as fences. The main use of the property for residential purposes is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance. Actions of the applicant have not caused the conditions from which relief is being sought by a variance. The variance request will be decided prior to construction of the fence. 6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the district involved. Fences are permitted in all land use districts. G) CASE 87 -016. Request for a conditional use permit in accordance with Section 17.17.030 (Conditional Uses) of the Borough Code to permit a temporary fireworks sales stand to locate in a RR1- -Rural Residential One Zoning District on Lot 3, Block 1, Woodland Acres Subdivision, or on Lot 18, Woodland Acres Subdivision First Addition or Lot 19, Woodland Acres Subdivision First Addition; 3694, 3746 or 3788 Rezanof Drive East. (Denton /Nachtweih) GORDON GOULD indicated 55 public hearing notices were mailed for this case and 3 were returned, expressing non - objection to this request. Staff recommended approval of this request, subject to seven conditions. Regular Session Closed. Public Hearing Opened: GUY DENTON appeared before the Commission and expressed support for this request. A discussion ensued amongst the Commissioners and Mr. Denton concerning the reason for not specifying a particular lot. Mr. Denton explained that the reason for not specifying a particular lot was that construction was being done in this area and that he wanted to be able to locate the fireworks stand as far away as possible from the equipment. Public Hearing Closed. Regular Session Opened. COMMISSIONER KNUDSEN MOVED TO GRANT A request for a conditional use permit in accordance with Section 17.17.030 of the Borough Code to permit a temporary fireworks sales stand to locate in a RR1- -Rural Residential One Zoning District on only one of the following properties: Lot 3, Block 1, Woodland Acres Subdivision, Lot 18, Woodland Acres First Addition, or Lot 19, Woodland Acres Subdivision First Addition, subject to the conditions of approval outlined in the staff report dated March 31, 1987, and to adopt the findings contained in the staff report as "Findings of Fact" for this case. The motion was seconded and CARRIED by majority roll call vote. Commissioner Rennell voted "no." CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. Fireworks sales shall only occur on one of the three lots and the applicant shall notify the Community Development Department of the sales location prior to commencement of sales. 2. The sale of fireworks shall be discontinued at this location by July 5, 1987. 3. The use and structure shall be removed from the lot by Monday, July 6, 1987. P & Z MINUTES 13 APRIL 15, 1987 [ VI-F Kodiak Island Borough MEMORANDUM DATE: March 25, 1987 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Community Development Department SUBJECT: Information for the April 15, 1987 Regular Meeting RE: CASE 87-015. Request for a variance from Section 17.54.010(C) (Height-Extension onto Public Property) of the Borough Code to permit a fence that complies with all other code provisions to project into the Simeonoff Street right-of-way in a R1--Single-Family Residential Zoning District. Lot 3, Block 57, East Addition; 1815 Simeonoff Street. (Al Boudreau) Twenty-nine (29) public hearing notices were mailed on March 27, 1987. Date of site visit: March 24, 1987 1. Applicant: Al Boudreau 2. Land Owner: Same. 3. Request: For a variance from Section 17.54.010(C) (Height-Extension onto Public Property) of the Borough Code to permit a fence that complies with all other code provisions to project into the Simeonoff Street right-of-way in a R1--Single-Family Residential Zoning District. 4. Purpose: To permit a four (4) foot fence to project into the Simeonoff Street right-of-way out to the sidewalk. 5. Existing Zoning: R1--Single-Family Residential 6. Zoning History: The 1968 Comprehensive Plan identifies this area as Residential-R1. Departmental files indicate no further activity. 7. Location: Physical: 1815 Simeonoff Street Legal: Lot 3, Block 57, East Addition 8. Lot Size: 6,716 square feet 9. Existing Land Use: Single-family residential CASE 87-015 1 APRIL 15, 1987 P&Z r -� VI -F 10. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North: Lot 8, Block 57, East Addition Use: Single - Family Residential Zoning: R1-- Single- Family Residential South: Lot 8, Block'56, East Addition Use: Single - Family Residential Zoning: R1 -- Single - Family Residential East: Lot 2, Block 57, East Addition Use: Single - Family Residential Zoning: R1 -- Single - Family Residential West: Lot 4, Block 57, East Addition Use: Single - Family Residential Zoning: R1-- Single- Family Residential 11. Comprehensive Plan: The 1968 Comprehensive Plan depicts this area for Medium Density Residential Development. 12. Applicable Regulations: The following sections of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Borough Code are applicable to this request: 17.54.010 Height -- Extension onto public property. Fences and walls not exceeding six feet in height may occupy any portion of a side or rear yard in any R district, provided that where such fence or wall projects beyond the front yard line or setback line toward the front property line, the following further restrictions shall apply: C. No fence, wall or hedge shall be erected or maintained on the public property beyond the front property line of any lot or parcel of land, except masonry or concrete retaining walls, and then only to a height not to exceed six inches above the grade of the earth such wall is contracted to retain. COASTAL MANAGEMENT APPLICABLE POLICIES Residential Development 1. Location In areas with poorly draining soils, development where feasible shall be connected to a sewer line. Where this is not feasible, on -site facilities shall be designed so as not to cause conditions that will pollute rivers, lakes, and other water bodies, including the ground water supply. Consistent: Yes. The lot is served by public sewer and water. 2. Open Space Green areas and open space shall be retained to the maximum extent feasible and prudent when land is subdivided. Consistent: Not applicable. This case does not involve any subdivision of land. CASE 87 -015 2 APRIL 15, 1987 P &Z 3. Access New subdivisions or other residential developments on the shoreline shall provide usable public access to and along the shoreline, extending the length of the development, to the extent feasible and prudent. Consistent: Not applicable. This property is not along the shoreline. 4. Hazardous Lands Development shall not occur in hazardous areas such as avalanche runout zones, active floodplains, and high water channels to the extent feasible and prudent. Siting, design, and construction measures to minimize exposure to coastal erosion, mass wasting and historic tsunami run-up shall be required to the extent feasible and prudent. Consistent: Yes. This property is not in a "hazardous" area. 5. Wetlands Filling and drainage of water bodies, floodways, backshores, and natural wetlands shall be consistent with ACMP Standards 6 AAC 80.070 (Energy Facilities) and 6 AAC 80.130 (Habitats). Consistent: Not applicable. This case does not involve the filling or drainage of water bodies. COMMENTS: The purpose of this request is to permit a fence to project into the Simeonoff Street right-of-way. In order for the Commission to grant a variance, all of the following conditions must be satisfied: 1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property ' or intended use of development, which generally do not apply to other properties in the same land use district. The exceptional condition applicable to the intended use of the property is largely a perceptual one. Typically, the average property owner assumes that all the land out to the sidewalk or roadway edge is their "yard," and that they should be able to erect a fence of reasonable height around that yard. In addition, if the fence was built along the property lines, strips of City property would remain outside the fence. It is likely that this property would not then be maintained by the property owner, this could constitute a public health problem. 2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in ,practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships. Strict application of the zoning ordinance would only allow the fence to be placed on the property line. This is an unnecessary hardship when many other CASE 87-015 3 APRIL 15', 1987 P&Z fences in the community have encroached on public property without first . receiving a variance. The Commission has also granted variances in the past for fences to project into road rights-of-way. 3. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare. Granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public's health, safety or welfare because the fence will not pose a line of sight visibility problem along Simeonoff Street. Also, the conditions outlined below ensure that any future removal of the fence will not impose a cost to the public. The erection of the fence out to the sidewalk will hopefully ensure that the small strip of City property is maintained by the property owner to the benefit of the City. 4. The granting of the variance will not be-contrary to the objectives of the • Comprehensive Plan. Granting of this variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan does not address minor structural developments such as fences. The main use of the property for residential purposes is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance. Actions of the applicant have not caused the conditions from which relief is being sought by a variance. The variance request will be decided prior to construction of the fence. 6. That the granting of the variance will not permit, a prohibited land use in the district involved. Fences are permitted in all land use districts. RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds that this request does meet all the conditions necessary for a variance to be granted under Chapter 17.66 (Variance) of the Borough Code. CASE 87-015 4 APRIL 15, 1987 P&Z 1L,I VI -F APPROPRIATE MOTION: Should the Commission agree with the staff recommendation, the appropriate motion is: Move to grant a request for a variance from Section 17.54.010 (C) of the Borough Code to permit a fence to project into the Simeonoff Street right -of -way in a R1-- Single - Family Residential Zoning District on Lot 3, Block 57, East Addition, subject to the conditions of approval outlined in the staff report dated March 25, 1987 and to adopt the findings contained in the staff report as "Findings of Fact" for this case. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The fence is constructed at the applicant's sole expense. 2. The applicant assumes any liability associated with said fence on City -owned property. 3. If at a future date the City determines that the fence must be removed from the City -owned property, the applicant or any subsequent owner of Lot 3, Block 57, East Addition, agrees to remove same'without cost to the City. 4. Since the land is publicly owned, no prescriptive right accrues to the user. 5. Construction of the fence shall be in such a manner as to not reduce any required off - street parking. CASE 87 -015 5 APRIL 15, 1987 P &Z ALLEY SIMEONOFF STREET .c....:•:•0•0•0...0.0.0.0.0.0 • • • • • • 0 • • 0 . ' • • ."". -::':*:*:-:*:•:-:-:*.*-% .. ... -. .. . . . . . . . .................. . CASE 87-015 1,0T 3 fila 5,7 EAST AbDITION- ' (Al Boudrea..1a) R=325'. :41 •,;';;;,; ,REBIDENTIAW:R4-,"' RES1DENTIAL R-2 • RESIDENTIAL RURAL:RESI6ENTIAL:e U ST' 131*A' BUSINESS:- 1■ VIP 17,VBLIC USE LANDS ;v'BID ;WATERSHED • 1. MN 1 T 2:: 6 SIMEONOFF ••• 11,4000Ezt g BLIEEL Aingininfin EINEM z 0 cn z 0 ;IVE -J 0 li Z11150711D, SEIPP' MIliffeW REZANOF ee, 40e January 6, 1987 Mr. Al Boudreau 1815 Simeonof St. Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Dear Mr. Boudreau: Permission is hereby given to construct a fence on public right-of-way in front of your property; Lot 3, Block 57, East Addition. This permission is subject to future needs of the City for the right-of-way.. Should the City require the right-of-way at some future date, you will be required to remove the fence. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, CITY OF KODIAK I LC, Herman T. Beukers Director of Public Works HTB/ak POST OFFICE BOA 1397, KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 PHONE (907) 486-3224 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH '- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 99615 ITEM VI -F PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE A public hearing will be held begin at 7:30 p.m. in the - Kodiak, Alaska, before the Commission, to heay./commepts, 1:4 on Wednesday, April 15, 1987. The:Nmeeting will Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak Island Borough Planning *id Zoning. if any, on'the following re(Mest: CASE 87-015. Request for a variance from ' Seion 1754.010(C) '(Height-Extension onto Public Property) of the Borough Code to permlt a fence that complies with all other code provisions to project into the---Simeonof-f Street right-of-way in a R1--Single-Family Residential Zoning District. Lot 3, Block 57, East Addition; 1815 Simeonoff Street. (Al Boudreau) ti EE C Li I if I: 13 APR 2 MI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. If you do not wish to testify verbally, you may provide your comments in the space below, or in a letter to the Community Development Department prior to the meeting You are being notified because you are a property owner in the area of the request. If you have any questions about the request, please call us at 486-5736, extension 255. Your Name: Shkel b WICAe- Mailing Address: c).0-,i)t- )0.9 3 Your property description: Comments: .21._ ,LOT L no • (fjc`-'1 •- • -• -• -• • -. .. • • • • • w • . • *.e.••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • ••••. ••••• •. w•••. • .. .••• •.•. .•. .•.•. ••.•. •.•.•.•.•.114.0.• •.•• *•.••••• • • It Li CASE 87 -015 LOT 3 BLK 57 EAST ADDITION (Al Boudreau) m R =325': RUBS A LILLY LAKE � . j►�RIyMtK SL/ONalow OW3nC4EMMErlien2rilaglgi • • • • • ZONING KEY RESIDENTIAL R -! RESIDENTIAL R -` RESIDENTIAL R -3 RURAL. RESIDENTU SS INDUSTRIAL CONSERVATI PUBLIC USE LANE WATERSHED Q CHICH N'r ••••. ••. •.•. • REZ4NOF sf Atkof CAF Kodiak Island Borough N'F.TURN TO SEE REASON CHECKED r.LAIMED :&DDRESSEE UNKNOWN iNSUFFIC1ENT ADDRESS NO SUCH STREET NUMBER NC: SIP: DO NOT REMAIL IN HIS ENVELOPE. 1120 700.30 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 • 3 3 3 e m e 73 vl/ • .. US PDS1AG ' „l7-', Y. MAR2787 . , . ----1S,- o.B.ME I I R •_ t : ic it-I- cis- Al Boudreau Box 3334 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Kodiak IslandBorough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615.6340 PHONE (907) 486 -5736 March 26, 1987 RE: CASE 87 -015. Request for a variance from Section 17.54.010(C) (Height - Extension onto Public Property) of the Borough Code to permit a fence that complies with all other code provisions to project into the Simeonoff Street right -of -way in a R1-- Single- Family Residential Zoning District. Lot 3, Block 57, East Addition; 1815 Simeonoff Street. Dear Mr. Boudreau: Please be advised that the above - referenced request has been scheduled for review and action by the Planning and Zoning Commission at their April 15, 1987 regular meeting. This meeting will begin at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska. Your attendance at this meeting is recommended. The week prior to the regular meeting, on Wednesday, April 8, 1987, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough conference room, the Commission will hold a worksession to review the packet material for the regular meeting. You are invited to attend this worksession in order to respond to any questions the Commission may have regarding this request. If you have any questions, please call the Community Development Department at 486 -5736, extension 255. Sincerely, Patricia Miley, Secktary Community Development Department KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 99615 ITEM VI-F PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE A public hearing will be held begin at 7:30 p.m. in the • Kodiak, Alaska, before the Commission, to hea*ecti*epts, on Wednesday, April 15, 1987. Themeeting will Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak Island Borough Zlanning, d Zoning, if any, on-the-fbIlowing reAest.: CASE 87-015. Regue4t_ for a' variance from Section 175L .010(0 (Height-Extension Onto Public Property) of the Barough•Code to permt a fence' that complies with allCther code provisions to project into the. Simeonoff Street right-of-way in a R1--Single-Family Residential Zoning District. Lot 3, Block 57; East Addition; 1815 Simeonoff Street. (Al Boudreau) If you do not wish to testify.verbally, you may provide your comments in the space below, or in a letter to the Community Development Department prior to the meeting. You are being notified because you are a property owner in the area of the request. If you have any questions about:the request, please call us at 486-5736, extension 255. Your Name: Mailing Address: Your property description: Comments: • '10.0•.•••••.•: ••• • • ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ••••• •• •••• .••• • •' •••••••••'•'••••0 • 0 4 1 • • • • • • • •• s• ••.•• ••10 •••4.0•.•••• ••••••.•...' • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • -- wra�or : UMEW EF afilt.at :: : : ::::: : : : :: : : :;..a: g�i.� ::::::: ::::: 0 :: 1010 :::::: p �++��� �.: ::.: •• �- 1010 • ,y� ij1�' STREET �1� l RUSSEL ��� THIRD .CASE 87 -015 LOT 3 BLK 57 EAST ADDITION (Al Boudreau) R =325' sta ZONING KEY RESIDENTIAL R -1 RESIDENTIAL R -2 RESIDENTIAL R -3 RURAL RESIDENTIA flaINNESS INDUSTRIAL CONSERVATIO PUBLIC USE LANDS WATERSHED � e "OIA D • • w •• •;SA • • ••• •s • • •• • •a • •4•••• • • • • • •••• t M x1J •8• k.ttr•g► . add! Vtif� a•y • ••• • 4.• ••.a0 w• .: T Or a • a 4 •. • • • * * • • • • • • r: 4 MU Q CHICK N• r • • • ♦ • • •g • • • • z 0 N z x S1M EON OFF STR ..�. aa EINEMM B r NOV 6 1 2 R1120540010 4 NELSON, SELDON E TINA 'BOX 302 6 LCOQ lAK A K�9_ 1.5 8 9 10 • 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 • 29 30 31 • 32 33 34 • 35 36 37 • 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 • 56 57 58 59 60 R1120540140 G00DWIN,STEPHEN E GOOD'WIN,BEATR.ICE 1722 SIMEONOFF KODIAK AK 99615 R1120540150 WESTERN ALASKA FISHERIES 1121 3RD AVE SUITE 1210 SEATTLE WA 98101 1� .101002.0 1 ODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH 2KIB 11 3 u 0_.3_LL_B A Y RD 4 KOOI AK AK 99615 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 R1- 0530010 KODIAK/CITY OF P.O. BOX 1397 KODIAK AK 99615 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 /A3 6010030 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH OKL 5 tls L._BA_Y_RD KODIAK AK 99615 R1 43_601 004_0 WOM AMER BAPTIST MISSION P.O. BOX KODIAK R1120560010 MAJOR/ JAMES E C. SHARON P.O. BOX 532 KODIAK AK 99615 81120560020 SOULE,WILLIAM C MARION P.D• BOX 352 KODIAK AK 99615 471/8' Pi z R1120560030 MARKOSKI,JERRY E RICARDA P.O. BOX 1343 KODIAK AK 99615 9 4 a R1 f560040 'IJOHNSON,CHARLES & CONNIE 2P.D. BOX 813 'KODIAK Al-99615 5 6 7 8 9 10ENGEL,CARSON L` P.O. " BOX 352 ODIAK 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 0560050 AK 99_615 R11205600_60 WICK,MELVIN P.O. BOX 1293 KODIAK AK_93 615 27 R1120560070 28LL AVE , ANGEL ITO ' & ADELAIOA 29P.O. BOX 786 USCG 30K0DIAK AK 99619 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 R1120560080 BLACKBURN, JAMES & CHRIS P.O.BOX 2298 KODIAK AK 99615 R1120560090 ROUNSAVILLE, SARAH K. -P. ©..BOX 547 KODIAK AK 99615 R1120560100 MCFARLAND,WALT & MARY L P.O. BOX 2774 KODIAK AK 99615 211 ?0 7001 .1 • GIBBENS,ERNEST S & LINDA P.O.BOX 4214 F6 K.OD3 AKA 6 112n570010- 'PI LLANS,GARY P. C JUDY L. 81817 SIMEONOFF ST. 9 &.CDD.IAK 1 2 3 4 15 R.1-12,05-7-4040 16 OUDREAU,A F. L YVONNE 17 ■06 BOX 490. USCG 18KDDI AK _ °;. AK 991):19 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 • 35 36 37 O 38 39 40 • 41 42 R 1`12 453�t�n:. REID,DANA M & SUSAN J 1813 SIMEONOFF }SOR3.A�C AK 99615' R1120570050 4NiCiETE, RAYMUND] ANIC`IETE'�FELISA 1811 SIMEONOFF ST KODIAK AK 99615 43CRATTYIALFRED E 441810 CHICKENOFF 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 AL33i.J, 5 GOTT'DONALD :W P.O, BOX 2501 CKODI AK R11205?OQ1Q AK 99615 'R1120570080 CHAPMAN,JAMES & DOROTHY 1814 CHICHENOFF KC3. n7 AK AA 9,9M I •6 R1120570090 STILLr MICHAEL S "GENEVI EVE" P.O. BOX' 2908 K0ftiA1 AiL9961 R1120570100 COLLINS,JEFF & 37065 GORE OR LENON LOUISE OR 97355 81420040002 POWELL, CH4" A.O. BOX ' b KODIAK & FRANCES A 9961 R1420050001 KAZIM COMPANY P.O. BOX 746 KODIAK THE AK 99615 R1420050002 POWELL,CHARLES P.O.. BOX 605 KODIAK. & FRANCES AK 996_1:. R1420050003 Ml1LLER r MILDRED P.O.. BOX 313 KODIAK D AK 99615 R1436010010 KODIAK,CITY OF P.O. BOX 1397 KODIAK ._ AK 99615 (or R11, os30 010 o vz — (-cn- 14- Rita oCih, p-0 ler IS It 0SY0 RIID% ocL.o 010 -11464..A i ixdV. tor D R' c2 Loo uss 7314A-cA-- R eaoLc. oo,q E -1 R I Lt• o0S-0 oo -U0S-P 1rL, li#3. 0 0S-o 0 03 R1(43 &ND olo Car Lt- 143 6oln 054c2 R octio LIO • • • • • • . . ._._. . .. • • • • • • •' • . • _. . . . . • . •'• . . II . • • • • • 44 Z(Jrv,nIG KEY SE 87 -015 LOT 3 BLK 57 EAST ADDITION (Al Boudreau). RESIDENTIAL R -1 RESfDENTIAL R -2 tJ. . . r..a,... . :: *./ R =325' 1" RESIDENTIAL R -3 RURAL RESIDENTIAL BUSINESS 4NDUSTRIAL CONSERVATION PUBLIC USE LANDS ATERSHED 8 R O A • CHICH NOr S SIME0NOFF ::IS gima EZANOF RIVE • • • • kUO1mK 1.:,Lm;,0 BOROUGH POST OFFICE BOX .1246 KODIAK,:ALASKA 99615 • • • • 4 ( ) Conditional Use Permit Exception uNr -, ( Variance . ( ) Zoning Change: From: To: CODE SECTION INVOLVED: r1,EA,cDto • NOTE: The application fee for all items covered by this form is $50. Conditional Use Permits, Exceptions, and Variance Applications also require the submission of a site plan. APPLICANT: G dft L i2LJ, Name - Home Telephone 130 33 Address Work Telephone . State, Zip PROPERTY: 15 54- Lot Block Subdivision Name United States Survey 4 Section, Township, Range, S.M. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY: PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY: 4.7-me,c4optA I have been advised of the procedures i!y;olvea with this request and have received a copy of the appropriate recuators. Authcrizd A.yit Date Application Accepteo: Prop rty 0. ner , Date ; i • Q 0 0.. • 4,‘ • se A . 60.00 ,L K O. 00 a\ 0 5 STREET 00' • - "dr ireW/341T, AL GAP* F'r'; • •• • • *el/ de: -/'f.-.2c 4 ttli 4 1? 61_11:011.111•V•eat•oosilesOo 11•••• • ot to 011.0441011 ••• e 00000000 es ewe: 00 1 NO. 1638-S )1 : 0/ .1. ...K.:C 011 --•..`4,1,.... ..a.to . %pp SURA4.41r - Alt 6.N gia3ti:.44. I hereby certify that I have surveyed the following described property: _/o74 3 7 i_SZO_C E_as '71 Add/ 7 )0 ),) ,CcId/ J./ "Co ak 461 and that the improvements situated thereon are within the property lines and do not overlap or encroach on the property lying adjacent thereto, that no improvements on property lying adjacent thereto encroach on the premises in question and that there are no roadways, transmis- sion lines or other visible easements on said property except as indi- cated hereon, Dated this _LL day of a.' . ROY A. ECK UND Registered Land Surveyor • Fitafttc' tint. 7 r t a SIMEONOFF STREET CASH RECEIPT Kodiak Island Borough 710 UPPER MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 -6340 PHONE (907) 486.5736 RECEIVED FROM • DATE - 000 - 101 -10 -00 010 - 000 - 105 -01 -00 010 -000- 105 -06 -00 010 -000- 111 -61 -00 010 -000 -107- -00 040 -000 -371 - 11 -00 040 - 000 -371 -12 -00 051 - 000 - 115- .00 -00 052 -000- 115 -00 -00 010 - 000 - 319 -10 -00 oto-on>32Z -c (o0 D CASH PROPERTY TAX, REAL PROPERTY TAX, PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX, LIENS PERSONAL TAX, LIENS LAND SALE, PRINCIPAL LAND SALE, INTEREST WATER SEWER PENALTIES, INTEREST PER ATTACHED 10448 198'7 CONDITIONS OF CHECK PAYMENTS PAYMENTS TENDERED BY CHECK FOR OBLIGATIONS DUE TO THE BOROUGH ARE SATISFIED ONLY UPON THE CHECK BEING HONORED. RETURNED CHECKS FOR ANY REASON RESTORES THE OBLIGATION AS UNPAID AND SUBJECTS THE PAYER TO ANY CHARGES, FEES OR OTHER LEGAL LIABILITIES AS MAY BE APPLICABLE. CASHIER ©s PAYOR 11 456 PAYMENT MADE BY: CHECK NO. Z.415 1 3 CASH o OTHER FMOB- 511815