Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
NEW KODIAK BK 18 LT 6A-1 - ZCP
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET DIVISION OF GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION SOUTHCENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE 3601 "C" Street SUITE 370 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503 -2798 PHONE: (907) 561 -6131 FAX: (907) 561 -6134 Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested CENTRAL OFFICE P.O. BOX AW • JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811-0165 PHONE: (907) 465 -3562 FAX: (907) 465 -3075 All Alaskan Seafoods (Alkod) 101 Marine Way Kodiak, AK 99615 Attention: Mr. Tim Blott Dear Mr.. Blott: WALTER J. HICKEL, GOVERNOR NORTHERN REGIONAL OFFICE 675 SEVENTH AVENUE STATION H FAIRBANKS, ALASKA 99701 -4596 PHONE: (907) 451 -2818 FAX: (907) 451 -2814 October 22, 1991 SUBJECT: CONCLUSIVE CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION ALL ALASKA SEAFOODS (ALKOD) NPDES PUBLIC NOTICE NUMBER AK-000036 -1 STATE I.D. NUMBER AK910827 -22A 1GOMMUNIIPARTM DEVELOPMENT IB 1.11 d C T 2 41991 j The Division of Governmental Coordination (DGC) has completed coordinating the state's review of your project for consistency with the Alaska Coastal Management Program (ACMP). On October 7, 1991 you were issued a proposed consistency finding. The project is . to reissue the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit to discharge process wastewater from the Alkod seafood processor into St. Paul Harbor and Near Island Channel. The project entails the discharge of a limited amount of wastewater associated with the processing of bottomfish, halibut, herring, salmon, scallops, an crab to St.. Paul Harbor. According to the Draft NPDES permit for this processor, the treatment of the wastewater prior to discharge shall be accomplished through the use of fine mesh (1 millimeter) screening or equivalent technology. Seafood wastes- shall not be pulverized, chopped, ground, or otherwise altered prior to screening. This conclusive consistency determination, developed under 6 AAC 50, applies to the following state and federal authorizations. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION.SYSTEMS (NPDES) PERMIT AK- 000036 -1 Mr. Blott 2 October 22, 1991 All Alaska. Seafoods (ALKOD) AK910827-22A DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION SECTION 401 CERTIFICATE OF REASONABLE ASSURANCE Based on the review of your project by the Alaska Departments of Natural Resources, Environmental Conservation (DEC), and Fish and Game, and the Kodiak Island Borough, the state concurs with your certification that the project, is consistent with the ACMP provided the following conditions are met: 1. Part I.A.3.d shall be added and read as follows: Monitoring results for process wastewater shall be reported on the monthly Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) as both pollutant concentrations (mg/1) and loading values (lbs. pollutant per 1,000 lbs. raw product). 2. Part I.A.4. shall be changed to require receiving water inspections to be conducted on a daily basis instead of weekly. These stipulations will appear on the Section 401 Certificate of Reasonable Assurance to be issued by DEC. These stipulations are necessary to ensure the proposed activity is consistent with the Air, Land, and Water Quality Standards of the ACMP (6 AAC 80.140). Copies of the pertinent ACMP Standards are enclosed. This conclusive consistency determination represents a consensus reached between you as the project applicant and the reviewing agencies listed above, as provided for under 6 AAC 50.070(k). As also provided under 15 CFR 930.64(c), federal authorization of your project will be made with the full understanding that your original project proposal has been modified subject to the conditions described above. If changes to the approved project are proposed prior to or during its siting, construction, or operation, you are required to contact this office immediately to determine if further review and approval of the revised project is necessary. The state reserves the right to •enforce compliance with this conclusive consistency determination if the project is changed in any significant way, or if the actual use differs from the approved use contained in the project description. If appropriate, the state may amend the state approvals listed in this conclusive consistency determination. lbl\close\alkod.cof Mr. Blott 3 October 22, 1991 All Alaska Seafoods (ALKOD) AK910827-22A By copy of this letter, we are informing the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers of our determination. Please be advised that although the State has found your project consistent with the ACMP, based on your project description and any stipulations contained herein, you are still required to meet all applicable State and federal laws and regulations. Your consistency determination may include reference to specific laws and regulations, but this in no way precludes your responsibility to comply with other applicable laws and regulations. If you have questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 561-6131. Sincerely, M'5<f-at Elizabeth A. Benson Project Review Coordinator Enclosure cc: Distribution List Harold Geren, EPA, Seattle 1b1\close\alkod.cof RODIAR ISLAND BOROUGH October 22, 1991 DISTRIBUTION LIST 'Ms. Judith Bittner, Department of Natural Resources, Division of Parks, Anchorage Ms. Veronica Gilbert, Department of Natural Resources, Anchorage Mr. Pete Panarese, Department of Natural Resources, - Anchorage Ms. Carol Sanner, Department of Transportation and Public Facilities,. Anchorage Ms. Elaine Pistoresi, Department of Environmental Conservation, Anchorage Mr. Lance Trasky, Department of Fish and Game, Anchorage Ms. Linda Freed, Kodiak Island Borough Mr.'Uwe L. Gross, Koniag Inc., Anchorage Mr. Gordon Pullar, Kodiak Area Native Association, Kodiak The Honorable Jerome Selby, Mayor of- Kodiak 1 OCT 2 41991 ttj ro COMMUNITY RT DEVELOPMENT STATE OF ALASKA DIVISION OF GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION STANDARD OF THE ALASKA COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 6 AAC 80.130. HABITATS (a) Habitats in the coastal area which are subject to the Alaska Coastal Management Program include: (1) offshore areas; (2) estuaries; (3) wetlands and tideflats; (4) rocky islands and seacliffs;' (5) barrier islands and lagoons; (6) exposed high energy coasts; (7) rivers, streams, and lakes; and (8) important upland habitat. (b) The habitats contained in (a) of this section must be managed so as to maintain or enhance the biological, physical, and chemical characteristics of the habitat which contribute to its capacity to support living resources. (c) In addition to the standard contained in (b) of this section, the following standards apply to the management of the following habitats; (1) offshore areas must be managed as a fisheries conservation zone so as to maintain or enhance the state's sport, commercial, and subsistence fishery; (2) estuaries must be managed so as to assure adequate water flow, natural circulation patterns, nutrients, and oxygen levels, and avoid the discharge of toxic .wastes, silt, and destruction of productive habitat; (3) wetlands and tideflats must be managed. so as to assure adequate water flow, nutrients, and oxygen levels and avoid adverse effects on natural drainage patterns, the destruction of important habitat, and the discharge of toxic substances; 6 AAC 80.130 Habitats 2 (4) rocky islands and seacliffs must be managed so as to avoid the harassment of wildlife, destruction of important habitat, and the introduction of competing or destructive species and predators; (5) barrier islands and lagoons must be managed so as to maintain adequate flows of sediments, detritus, and water, avoid the alteration or redirection of wave energy which would lead to the filling in of lagoons or the erosion of barrier islands, and discourage activities which would decrease the use of barrier islands by coastal species, including polar bears and nesting birds; (6) high energy coasts must be managed by assuring the adequate mix and transport of sediments and nutrients and avoiding redirection of transport processes and wave energy; and (7) rivers, streams, and lakes must be managed to protect natural vegetation, water quality, important fish or wildlife habitat and natural water flow. (d) Uses and activities in the coastal area which will not conform to the standards contained in (b) and (c) of this section may be allowed by the district or . appropriate state agency if the following are established: (1) there is .a significant public need for the proposed use or activity; (2) there is no feasible prudent alternative to meet the public need for the proposed use or activity which would conform to the standards contained in (b) and (c) of this section: and (3) all feasible and prudent steps to maximize conformance with the standards contained in (b) and (c) of this section will be taken. (e) In applying this section, districts and state agencies may use appropriate expertise, including regional programs referred to in section 30(b) of this chapter. Authority: AS 44.19.893 AS 46.40.040 sh11-16 • STATE OP ALASKA DIVISION OF GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION STANDARD OF TEE ALASKA COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 6 AAC 80.140. AIR, LAND, AND WATER QUALITY Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the statues pertaining. to and the regulations and procedures of the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation with respect to the protection of air, land, and water quality are incorporated into the Alaska Coastal Management'Prograa and, as administered by that agency, constitute the components of the coastal management program with respect to those purposes. Al Authority: - AS 44.19.893 AS 46.40.040 shll /15 OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET DIVISION OF GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION SOUTHCENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE 3601 "C" Street SUITE 370 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503-2798 PHONE: (907) 561-6131 FAX: (907) 561-6134 Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested CENTRAL OFFICE P.O. BOX AW JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811-0165 PHONE: (907) 465-3562 FAX: (907) 465-3075 •All Alaskan Seafoods (Alkod) 101 Marine Way Kodiak, AK 99615 Attention: Mr. Tim Blott Dear Mr. Blott: WALTER J. HICKEL, GOVERNOR NORTHERN REGIONAL OFFICE 675 SEVENTH AVENUE STATION 14 FAIRBANKS, ALASKA 99701-4596 PHONE: (907) 451-2818 FAX: (907) 451-2814 October 7, 1991 SUBJECT: PROPOSED CONSISTENCY FINDING cALL_ALASKKISEAFOODS (ALKOD). NPDES PUBLIC NOTICE NUMBER AK-000036-1 STATE I.D. NUMBER AK910827-22A The Division of Governmental Coordination (DGC) is currently coordinating the state's review of your project for consistency with the Alaska Coastal Management Program (ACMP) and has developed this proposed consistency finding based on reviewers' comments. The project is to reissue the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit to discharge process wastewater from the Alkod seafood processor into St. Paul Harbor and Near Island Channel. The project entails the discharge of a limited amount of wastewater associated with the processing of bottomfish, halibut, herring, salmon, scallops, an crab to St. Paul Harbor. According to the Draft NPDES permit for this processor, the treatment of the wastewater prior to discharge shall be accomplished through the use of fine mesh (1 millimeter) screening or equivalent technology. Seafood wastes shall not be pulverized, chopped, ground, or otherwise altered prior to screening. This proposed consistency finding, developed under 6 AAC 50, applies to the following state and federal authorizations. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEMS (NPDES) PERMIT AK-000036-1 • J Mr. Blott STATE I.D. NO.AK9•0817-22A 2 October 7, 1991 • DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION SECTION 401 CERTIFICATE OF REASONABLE ASSURANCE - Based on the review of your project by the' Alaska Departments of Natural Resources, Environmental Conservation (DEC), and Fish and Game, and the Kodiak Island Borough, the state concurs with your certification that the project is consistent with the ACMP provided the following conditions are met: 1. Part I.A.3.d shall be added and read as follows: Monitoring results for process wastewater shall be reported ..on the monthly Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) as both pollutant concentrations (mg/1) and loading values (lbs. pollutant per 1,000 lbs. *raw • product). 2. Part I.A.4. shall be changed to require receiving water inspections to be conducted on a daily basis instead of • weekly. These stipulations will appear on the Section 401 Certificate of Reasonable Assurance to be issued by DEC. These stipulations are necessary to ensure the proposed activity is consistent with the Air, Land, and Water Quality Standards of the ACMP (6 AAC 80.140). Copies of the pertinent ACMP Standards are enclosed. Please contact me within five days of your receipt of this proposed finding to indicate whether or not you concur with this finding. If you are not prepared to concur within the five-day period, you may either: (a) request an extension of the review schedule, if you need more time to consider this finding, or (b) request that the state reconsider this finding, by submitting a written statement requesting "elevation" of the finding, describing your concerns, and proposing as alternative consistency finding, This alternative finding must demonstrate how your project is consistent with the referenced standards of the ACMP and district policies without the stipulations included • in this proposed finding. If I do not receive your request for extension or an elevation statement from you, or any other reviewing party with elevation rights as per 6 AAC 50.070(j), within-five days of receipt of this letter, this proposed finding will be issued as a final conclusive consistency determination. Mr. Blott STATE I.D. NO.AK910817-22A 3 October 7, 1991 By copy of this letter, we are informing the Environmental Protection Agency of our proposed finding. Please be advised that although the State has found your project consistent with the ACMP, based on your project description and any stipulations contained herein, you are still required to meet all applicable State andofederal laws and regulations. Your consistency determination may include reference to specific laws and regulations, but this in no way precludes your responsibility to comply with other applicable laws and regulations. If you have questions regarding this process, please contact me at 561-6131. Sincerely, Elizabeth A: Benson Project Review. Coordinator Enclosure cc: Distribution List Harold Geren, EPA, Seattle KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH October 7, 1991 DISTRIBUTION LIST Ms. Judith Bittner, Department of Natural Resources, Division of Parks, Anchorage Mr.. Tom Brooks, Manager, Civil Engineerng Alaska Railroad Corporation, Anchorage Ms. Veronica Gilbert, Department of Natural Resources,' Anchorage Pete Panarese, Department of Natural Resources, Anchorage Ms.'Carol Sarver, Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, Anchorage' Ms. Elaine Pistoresi, Department of Environmental Conservation, Anchorage. Mr. Lance Trasky, Department of Fish and Game, Anchorage Ms. Linda Freed, Kodiak Island Borough Mr. Uwe L. Gross, Koniag Inc., Anchorage Mr. Gordon ',Uttar, Kodiak Arera Native Association, Kodiak The Honorable Jerome Selby, Mayor of Kodiak MEMORANSITJM • TO: Elizabeth Benson • Project Review Coordinator Division of Governmental Coordination Office of Management and • Budge PROM: C: Wane Dolezal. Habitat Biologist Region II Habitat Division Department of Fish and Game State di Alaska Department of Fish and Game . DATE: October 2, 1991 FILE NO: TELEPHONE NO: SUBJECT: 267-2284 All--Alaskan-S4-i-faods (Alkod-Taciaity) NPDES Permit No. AK-000036-1 Seafood Process Waste Discharge SID AK910827-22A The Alaska Department of Fish and Game has reviewed the wastewater discharge permit application referenced above. The project entails the discharge of a limited amount of wastewater from the processing of bottomfish, halibut, herring, salmon, scallops, and crab to St. Paul Harbor. We understand that treatment of the wastewater prior to discharge shall be accomplished through the use of fine mesh (1 millimeter) screening or equivalent technology. Further, seafood wastes •shall not be pulverized, chopped, ground or otherwise altered prior to screening. We have no objection to the project as proposed. Pursuant to 6 AAC 80.010(b), the ADF&G recommends that this project • be found consistent with the Standards of the Alaska Coastal Management Program and the Kodiak Island Borough Coastal Management Program. We appreciate the opportunity to comment. If you have any specific questions, please contact me at 267-2333. cc: D. Kohler, COE R. Dolan, DEC J. Jett, DNR/DL P. Probasco, ADF&G L. Schwarz, ADF&G L. White, ADF&G D. McGillivary, USFWS P. North, EPA B. Smith, NMES L. Freed, Kodiak Island Borough Kodiak Island Borough Elizabeth Benson, Project Coordinator OMB-DGC Southcentral Regional Office 3601 C Street, Suite 370 Anchorage, AK 99503 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 RE: SID AK 910827-22A - All Alaskan Seafoods NPDES AK-000036-1 (Alkod Facility) Dear Ms. Benson: September 22, 1991 The Kodiak Island Borough has reviewed the seafood processing facility discharge permit referenced above. We support the issuance of the permit as long as state water quality standards are met. For the record, the Kodiak Island Borough does not have the expertise to review the technical aspects of the permit. Seafood processing is a significant contributor to economic activity in the Kodiak Island Borough. Based on our limited review of the permit application, the Kodiak Island Borough recommends that this permit be found consistent with the Kodiak Island Borough Coastal Management Program (KIBCMP) and the Alaska Coastal Management Program (ACMP). If you have any questions about these comments, please call me. Sincerely, Linda Freed, Director Community Development Department cc: W. Dolezal, ADF&G V. Gilbert, ADNR B. Lamoreaux, ADEC Timothy Blott, All Alaskan Seafoods Ray Camardella, KIB Engineering/Facilities Dept. -.- AUG 3 0 1991 • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT _ DEC DFG DNR COE OFFICE OF TIM GOVERNOR OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET 4hift---7— DIVISION OF GOVERNMEN74 L COORDINATION , PROJECT PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET LE II/05S Ak (.0,k4d wftw J. MINI, Gov SOUTHCENTRAL REGIONAL C xer smEu SUITE SO ANcHONAGE, MASK* 905034 PHONE MO1)5014131 d STATE I.D. NUMBER: AK910 Z - 2 2.A DGC CONTACT: Pi zailveht. e. #156),%. Phone 561-6131 APPLICANT/PROPONENT: All AkSiet-v.-, (-94.431dr Agent Phone ifirE6- 3 2.4 561-6134 DIRECT FEDERAL ACTION: YES NO REVIEW TYPE: CONSISTENCY__1 ANILCA ,ACITVTIT TYPE: ARMED FORCES COMMERCIAL LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN MINING: HARDROCK PLACER OFFSHORE OIL & GAS PUBLIC UTILITIES/FACILITIES PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL FILL PLACEMENT FLOATING STRUCTURES SLA NEPA •OTHER FISHERIES PRODUCTION: GENERAL HATCHERY REMOTE RELEASE ENHANCEbIENT PROCESSING 17—eftellt-e-' • AQUATIC FARMS: SHELLFISH AQUATIC PLANTS HYDRO POWER TIMBER OTHER PROJECT LOCATION: Nearest Coastal District Ai;diGLi z/4( 44)01, Project Inside the District Boundary Yes L.-- No District Plan Approved Yes I ...No REVIEW MILESTONES: ' • Day 1 22-1 1.9 q Reviewer Request for Add'l Info q 2. 1111 comments Due To DGC r?-4- Z..1 t et 9 Notification To Applicant .fc t ( gat •Decision Deadline ' CA, 41. 2.3 i C REVIEW SCHEDULE: 15 DAY 30 DAY 50 DAY 4-•••• CYTHER z S #`zA rr je 61- '" S%r * *.. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * #* PLEASE ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS. INCOMPLETE QUESTIONNAI.MAY. PART A Applicant: o . a u PLEASE INCLUDE MAPS OR PLAN DRAWINGS WITH YOUR PACKET. AN: BE RETURNED AND WILL DELAY THE REVIEW OF YOUR PROJECT. Address: 1'0 Rai ; Dk•Ale 7o7 rief description of project Phon w -71 • - 9G�� s Contact Person: Address: - 14.3 ---11 ar •r e 1-4/377 — 3Z4,(„ Phone (day): (iuV 3 96 3 oorxa�vity,•.tncluding associated facilities -7 ;S i3 p, 14.- a .new ro,jec1. Starting date for project Endingdate for project Location of Project (include nearest community or identifiable land or water body):_,; Meridian_ Township_ Range Section iguot. Parts_, USGS Map, federal land Is the project on: private land X state land municipal land ownership not known„ Identify which region of the State the project is in (see attached map): northern southcentral' X southeast PART B Yes 1. Do you currently have any State or federal approvals/permits for this project? If yes, please list below, Permit /Approval Type Permit /Approval # Expiration Date '7 7'e Gds A a.I l J P 7 h mod & P S S ,, d,; Z/3 // g7 1 L P"; .P N. P, D. E.s Alt o coo 3 (- / Will you be placing.structures, or_ placing fills in any of the following: tidal waters, streams, lakes, wetlands *? * . If you are, uncertain whether your proposed project area As in a wetland, contact the Corps of Engineers, Regulatory Branch at (907) 753-2720 for a wetlands determination. If you are outside the Anchorage area call toll free 1-800- 478 - 2712. If yes, have you applied for or do you intend to apply for a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers-(COE) permit? (The COE has jurisdiction over activities descrtbed above.) Please Indicate In Question No. 3 below, whew your e* to the COE or when. you intend to apply. 3. .Nave you applledor do you intend to apply for other - permits from any federal agency?' If yes, list below: Agency, 7B4 Date you submitted or Permit /Approval Type plan to submit application tietDE. Q(1_, LAI Yes * * * * * * * * • * *_ * . * * * 0 * *" * * * PART C DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 1.. Is the proposed project on State -owned land or will you need to cross State lands.for access? (Note: In addition to State owned uplands, the State has jurisdiction over most lands below the ordinary high water . line of streams, rivers, lakes, and line of mean hlgh.tide of the'tldelands seaward for three miles.) . Is any portion of your project placed below the ordinary high water line of a stream, river, lake or other water body? Will you be dredging? If yes, location of dredging: Meridian (M) Township (T) Range (R) Section (Sec) Location of disposal site for dred9ed material: M T R Sec Will you be: ft l l i ng with rock, sand or graven If yes,. amount ?. 0 Location of - source: • M R Sec. of area to be filled: M .T R 0 Sec 5. Do you plan to use any of the following state -owned resources? Timber If yes, amount ?. Location of source: M T 0 Sec x Other Materials . If yes, , what met/? sl7* • . pea , •u • ng stone, s t, ove •ur•en, etc. Location of .sources M T R Sec, 6. Are you planning to: ust any water? If yes, amount? . Source? . 0; 47 04 /c'd c? 7. Will. you be building or. al teri ng a dam? Do you plan to drill a geothermal well? 9. 1011 you be exploring for or extracting coal? 10. Will you be exploring:for or extracting minerals on state-owned. land? Yes w 11. Will you be exploring for or extracting oil and gas on state-owned land? _ X 12. Will you be .harvesting timber from 10 or more acres? 13. Will you be investigating or removing historic or archeological. X resources on State -owned lands? 14. Will the project be located in a unit of the State .Pai, System (includfng,the Kenai River Special Management Area, State Recreation Areas, State Historic Sites, State Preserves, etc.)? IF YOU CORRECTLY ANSWERED, NO TO ALL THESE QUESTIONS, YOU 00 NOT NEED APPROVAL FROM,THE ALASKA DEPARTMENI�F NATURAL RESOURCES (DNR). GO TO PART 0. IF YOU ANSWERED YES TO ANY OF THESE: QUESTIONS, CONTACT ONR TO IDENTIFY ANO OBTAIN ANY NECESSARY APPLICATTON FORMS. If you have already contacted DNR, are you now sutmttting appl ica: cn ; for permits or approvals? If yes, list ONR approvals for :which you a-_ now applying:. Have you paid the filing fees required for the DNR permits? If you.. are not applying for permits, indicate the reason below: a. (DNR. contact) told me on (date) that no DNR approvals or permits were required for this project. . Other. " * * * * * * .t * * * * * * * * * * * +r * * PART 0 DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME 1. Wi11 you be workin in a• stream, river, or lake (this includes running : water or on ice,. thta1 the, active floodplain, on islands, the face . of the banks, or ._stream tideflats down to mean low tide)? Name of stream or river Name of lake If no, go to question number 3. If yes, will you be doing any of the following: a) Building of a dam, river training structure or instream impoundment? b) Using the water? c) Diverting or altering the natural channel . stream? d) Blocking or damming the stream (temporarily or permanently)? e) Changing the flow of the water or changing the bed? f). Pumping water out of the stream or lake? g) Introducing silt, gravel, rock, petroleum products, debris, chemicals, or wastes of any type into the water? h) Using the stream as a road (even when frozen), or crossing the stream with tracked or wheeled vehicles, log- dragging or excavation equipment (backhoes, bulldozers, etc.)? i) Altering or stabilizing the banks? j) Mining or digging in the beds or banks? k) Using explosives? 1) Building a bridge (including an ice bridge)? m) Installing a culvert or other drainage structure? n) Constructing a weir? Is your projtct located in a State Game Refuge, Critical Habitat Area, or State Game Sanctuary? Does your project include the construction and operation of a salmon hatchery? 5. Does your project affect or is it related to a previously permitted salmon hatchery? IF YOU CORRECTLY ANSWERED NO TO ALL THESE QUESTIONS, YOU DO NOT NEED A PERMIT FROM THE ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME (DFG). GO TO PART E. IF YOU ANSWERED YES TO QUESTIONS 1 -3, CONTACT THE REGIONAL HABITAT DIVISION OFFICE Tr!DENTIFY AND OBTAIN ANY NECESSARY APPLICATION FORMS. Yes No 011■111■111M■ •••1111=111=11 IF YOU ANSWERED YES TO QUESTIONS 4.5, CONTACT THE PRIVATE NONPROFIT HATCHERY OFFICE AT F.R.E.D, DIVISION HEADQUARTERS TO OBTAIN INFORMATION . AND ANY NECESSARY APPLICATION FORMS. ;�. Yes - No If you have already contacted OFG, are you now submitting an application for permit(s)?t: If yes,. list DFG approvals for which you are now applying: r0• 1.ss 04t If you are not applying for permits, indicate the reason below: . a. (DFG contact) told me on (date) . that no 'PG approvals or permits were required for this project. b. Other. • * • • * * * • * • *. • * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PART E DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION 1. Will a discharge of wastewater from industrial or commercial• operations occur? Will your project generate air emissions from the following: a) Diesel generators totaling more than 10,000 hp? b). Other fossil fuel - fired electric generator, furnace, orboller totaling greater than 10,000 hp, or 9,000kw, or 100,000,000 btu /hr? c) Asphalt plant? d) Incinerator burning more than 1000 lbs. per hour ?. e) Industrial process? Will . a drinking water supply be developed that serves more than a single- family residence? 4. Will you be processing seafood? 5. Will food service be provided to the public or workers? 6. Will the project result in dredging or disposal of fill in wetlands or . placement of a. structure in waterways? (Note: If you are applying to the Corps of Engineers for a permit for this activity, the. Corps will automatically request certification from DEC.) 7. Is on-lot sewage or greywater disposal involved or necessary? 8. Will your project result in the development of a currently unpermitted facility for the disposal of domestic or industrial solid waste? 9. Will your project require offshore drilling or vessel transport ofoil, or other petroleum products as cargo, or include onshore facilities with an effective storage capacity of greater than 10,000 barrels of such products? . Yes 'No 10. Wili.your project require the' application of oil or pesticides to the surface of the land ?. IF YOU CORRECTLY Rim NO TO ALL THESE QUESTIONS, YOU 00 NOT NEED A PERMIT OR OTHER APPROVAL FRO TNE*—XLASKA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION (DEC) GO TO PART F. IF YOU ANSWERED YES TO ANY OF THESE QUESTIONS (SEE CLARIFYING NOTE IN NO. 6, ABOVE) CONTACT THE DEC REb`IONAL OFFICE TO IDENTIFY AND OBTAIN ANY NECESSARY APPLICATION FORMS. If you have already contacted the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, are you now submitting an- application for permit(s)? If yes, list the permits for which you are now applying: I L r L/ // 11 i /pr/r: * TO o�por)Je a fe' hdJ . gee. sh- � Ph ,'. �I If you are not applying for permits, indicate the reason below: a. (DEC contact) told me on (date) that no DEZ approvals or permits were required for this project. b. Other. * * • * * * * * * * * * * *. • * * • * * PA.._ T F To the best of my knowledge, this information is accurate and complete. Sig Date J TO COMPLETE YOUR PACKET, PLEASE ATTACH YOUR STATE PERMIT APPLICATIONS AND COPIES OF YOUR.FE APPLICATIONS TO THIS QUESTIONNAIRE. PLEASE SUBMIT YOUR PACKET AS INDICATED ON PAGE ONE. cp questionnaire /PERMIT United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 10 Park Place Building, 13th Floor 1200 Sixth Avenue, WD -134 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 553 -1214 NOTICE OF PROPOSED REISSUANCE OF NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMITS TO DISCHARGE TO WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES, NOTICE OF STATE CERTIFICATION, AND NOTICE OF STATE DETERMINATION OF CONSISTENCY WITH THE ALASKA COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Public Notice No.: AK- 000043 -3, AK- 000083 -3, AJC- 000036 -1, AR- 000042 -6, AK- 000008 -6, AK- 000035 -3, AR- 002666 -2, AK- 000049 -3, AK- 000082 -5 Public Notice Issuance Date: August. 5, 1991 Public Notice Expiration Date: Sept esbec 3, 1991 1. Anplicant The following Kodiak seafood processors have applied for reissuance of their National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits to discharge process wastewater into St. Paul Harbor and Near Island Channel. These waters are classified by the Alaska State ,Water Quality Standards as class 2A, 2B, 2C, and 2D for use in aquaculture, seafood processing, and industrial water supply; contact and secondary water recreation; growth and propagation of fish, shellfish, aquatic life and wildlife; and harvesting for the 'consumption of raw mollusks or other raw aquatic life. Fact sheets are available. 1. Alaska Pacific Seafoods, Inc. P.O. Box 31179 Seattle, Wa. 98103 Application No. AK- 000043 -4 2. All Alaskan Seafoods, Inc.(Star of Kodiak) P.O. Box 646 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Application No. AK- 000083 -3 3. All Alaskan Seafoods, Inc. (Alkod) 101 Marine Way Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Application No. AK- 000036 -1 Page 2 4. East° -Point Seafood Company Building C -3, Fisherman's Terminal Seattle, Wa. 98119 Application No. AK- 000042 -6 5. Faros Seafoods, Inc. 325 Shelikof Street Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Application No. AK- 000008 -6 6. International Seafoods of Alaska, Inc. P.O. Box 2997 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Application No. AK- 000035 -3 7. International Seafoods of Alaska, Inc. P.O. Box 2997 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Application No. AK- 002666 -2 8. King Crab, Inc. P.O. Box C -70739 Seattle, Wa. 98107 Application No. AK- 000049 -3 9. Western Alaska Fisheries., Inc. 1111 3rd. Avenue, Suite 1210 Seattle, Wa 98101 Application No. AK- 000082 -5 2. Tentative Determination The Region 10 Office of the EPA has tentatively determined to reissue a discharge permit to the above listed applicants. State Certification This Notice will also serve as Public Notice of the intent of the State of Alaska, Department of Environmental Conservation to consider certifying that the subject discharge will comply with the applicable provisions of Section 208(e), 301, 301, 303, 306 and 307 of the Clean Water Act. The NPDES permit will not be issued until the certification requirements of Section 401 have been met. 4. State Consistency Determination This Notice will also serve as Public Notice of the intent of the State of Alaska, Office of Management and Budget, Division of Governmental Coordination, to review this action for consistency with the approved Alaska Coastal Management Program. Page 3 . public Ctd Persons wising to comment on the tentative determinations contained • in the proposed permit or wishing to request that a public hearing be held, may do so in writing,. within 30 days of the date of this public notice. A request for a public hearing shall state. the nature of the issues to be raised as well as the requester's name, address and telephone number. Comments must be received within this 30 day period to be considered in the formulation of final determinations regarding the application. All comments should include the name, address and telephone number of the commenter and a concise statement of the exact basis of any comment and the relevant facts upon which it is based. All written comments and requests should be submitted to EPA at the above address to the attention of the Director, Water Division. Persons wishing to comment on State Certification should submit written comments within this 30 day period to the State of Alaska, Southcentral Regional Office, Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC), 3601 .'C' Street, Suite 1334, Anchorage, Alaska 99503. Persons wishing to comment on the State Determination of Consistency with the Alaska Coastal Management Program should submit written comments within this 30 day period, to the State of Alaska, Southcentral Regional Office, Office of Management and Budget, Division of Governmental Coordination, 3601 'C' Street, Suite 370, Anchorage, Alaska 99503. Comments should be addressed to the attention of Alaska Coastal Management.Program Consistency Review. 6. Administrative Record The proposed NPDES permit and other related documents are on file and may be inspected at the above address any time between 8:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Copies and other information may requested by writing to the EPA at the above address to the attention of the Water Permits Section, or by calling (206) 553 -1214. This material is also available from the EPA Alaska Operations Office, Room 537, Federal Building, 222 West 7th Avenue, #19, Anchorage, Alaska 99513. FACT SHEET United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 10 Park Place Building, 13th Floor 1200 Sixth Avenue, WD -134 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 553 -1214 Date: AUG 051991 Permit No.: AK- 000036 -1 PROPOSED REISSUANCE OF A NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT TO DISCHARGE POLLUTANTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT (CWA) ALL ALASKAN SEAFOODS, INC. (ALKOD FACILITY) has applied for reissuance of a NPDES permit to discharge pollutants pursuant to the provisions of the CWA. This Fact Sheet includes (a) the. tentative determination of the EPA to reissue the permit, (b) information on public comment, public hearing and appeal procedures, (c) the description of the current discharge, (d) a listing of tentative effluent limitations, schedules of compliance and other conditions, and (e) a sketch or detailed description of the discharge location.- We call your special attention to the technical material presented in the latter part of this document. Persons wishing to comment on the tentative determinations contained in the proposed permit reissuance may do so by the expiration date of the Public Notice. All written comments should be submitted to EPA as described in the Public Comments Section of the attached Public Notice. After the expiration date of the Public Notice, the Director, Water Division, will make final determinations with respect to the permit reissuance. The tentative determinations contained in the draft permit will become final conditions if no substantive comments are received during the public notice period. The permit will become effective 30 days after the final determinations are made, unless -a request for an evidentiary hearing is submitted within 30 days after receipt of the final determinations. The proposed NPDES permit and other related documents are on file and may be inspected at the above address any time between 8:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Copies and other information may be requested by writing to EPA at the above address to the attention of the Water Permits Section, or by calling (206) 553.- 1214. This material is also available from the EPA Alaska Operations Office, Room 537, Federal Building, 222 W. 7th Avenue, 119., Anchorage, Alaska 99513. Page 2 Technical Information I. Applicant All Alaskan Seafoods, Inc. 101 Marine Way Kodiak, Alaska 99615 NPDES Permit No. AK- 000036 -1 Facility Contact: Gary Taylor, Plant Manager II. Activity All Alaskan Seafoods, Inc. is a seafood facility in Kodiak, Alaska. Currently, this facility is not in operation. The facility has the potential to process seafood year round with a maximum production of 500 short tons.. per day of raw seafood. The expected maximum production of each species to be processed is as follows: Species 'Maximum Daily Production (Short Tons /Dav) (Pounds /Day) Salmon (Mechanized) 90 180,000 Bottomfish" 185 370,000 Herring 60 120,000 Crab 75 150,000 Scallops 15 30,000 III. Receiving Waters A. St. Paul Harbor, Alaska B. St. Paul Harbor, Alaska is classified by the Alaska State Water Quality Standards as Classes (2)(A)(i)(ii)(iii), (B) (i) (ii) , (C) and (D) for use in aquaculture, seafood processing and industrial . water supply, contact and secondary water recreation, growth and propagation of fish, shellfish, other aquatic life and wildlife, and harvesting for the consumption of raw mollusks or other raw aquatic. life. ' Page 3 C. The state water quality parameters which could be affected by the discharge are dissolved gas, pH, turbidity, oil and grease, residual chlorine,-total Suspended solids and settleable solids. IV. packaround -A. The original NPDES permit, issued to Swiftsure Alaska, Inc., became effective June 2, 1975 and expired on May 31, 1980. The permit was then transferred -to Kodiak Swiftsure Corp. on June 19, 1980. The permit was reissued to Kodiak Swiftsure Corp., effective April 20,. 1983, and expiring April 19, 1988. During its five year life, the reissued permit, was transferred to- Northstar Seafood, Inc., and 'Alkod Seafoods, Inc. on December 1,1983, and.February 1,'1987, - respectively. An application for permit reissuance was received from Alkod Seaf000ds, Inc. on September 28, 1987; On June 9,1989, the facility was purchased.by All Alaskan Seafoods, Inc. The conditions of the expired permit remain in effect as required by 40 CFR Part 122.6. Existing industrial treatment includes grinding seafood wastes and transmitting the effluent across a double sided tangential screen. The screened effluent is discharged' to St. Paul Harbor. The Screened solids are collected and transported to Kodiak Reduction, Inc. (KRI). In February 1984,-the reduction facility was closed, with intent to reopen after reconstruction in Aarch 1986. During this period of inactivity, solid wastes were barged to a designated seafood dumping zone in Chiniak Bay. In March 1990, the reduction facility again closed down operations for a period of four months, wastes were again barged to the seafood dumping zone for'disposal. All Alaskan Seafoods, Inc. will be upgrading their waste handling system to a.dry conveyance method. Process water, obtained from the City of Kodiak; is chlorinated, prior to .use by All Alaskan Seafoods, Inc. D. Sanitary wastes are discharged to the Kodiak City municipal treatment. plant. The facility maintains one industrial.outfall line, located 150 feet from shore, at a depth of 11 feet below the water surface. F. Pollutants associated with the discharge are primarily conventional and include pH, total suspended solids, and oil and grease. • Page 4 v. Basis of Limitation and lionitorina Requirements A. There are four modifications in the proposed permit which differ significantly from the previously issued NPDES permit. 1. All seafood waste shall be disposed of at a by- product reduction facility. Limited access to the ocean dumping zone is provided for the following: a. Waste which is unsuitable for by- product recovery. b. When the by- product recovery facility is operating at maximum capacity or is closed for repair and /or maintenance and is unable to accept seafood waste. 2. When effluent limitation guidelines (40 CFR 408.202) were established the bottomfish industry in Alaska was primarily halibut, which is brought to the processing facility gutted. The product was headed and frozen and shipped out in that condition. The effluent from this process was quite low in pollutants. In the past several years a new bottomfish industry has emerged in Alaska. Halibut is no longer the dominant bottomfish species processed. Bottomfish such as cod pollock, and flatfish are harvested in large quantities. These species are usually brought to the plant whole, where the fish are mechanically butchered. Today's processing of bottomfish involves more extensive butchering and mechanization, therefore it has been determined that Non - Alaskan Mechanized Bottomfish Processing (40 CFR 408.222) more accurately reflect current seafood processing operations. 3. Monitoring residual chlorine is required to assess the impacts of this pollutant in the receiving environment. 4. Not grinding seafood wastes prior to screening was a requirement of the previous permit. To clarify the intent of this requirement the wording has been modified to the following: Seafood wastes shall not be pulverized, ground, chopped or otherwise altered prior . to screening. B. The effluent limitations for the screened wastewater from finfish processing are based on, Alaskan Mechanized Salmon Processing (40 CFR 408.172), Non - Alaskan Mechanized Bottomfish Processing (40 CFR 408.222), Alaskan Bottomfish Processing (40 CFR 408.202), Non - Remote Alaskan Whole Crab and Crab Section Processing (40 CFR 408..62), Alaskan Herring Fillet Processing (40 CFR 408.312) and Alaskan Scallop Processing (40 CFR 408.292). guidelines. Page 5 When more then one species is processed on a sampling day, tho effluent limitation for that day is based on the proportion of each species processed. Variable monthly limits are also based on the proportion of each species processed. EPA has determined that this method of determining a variable limit is appropriate, since EPA guidelines (40 CFR 408) are expressed in terms of pounds of pollutant per 1000 pounds of raw product processed. The method to determine the variable . limitations and an example calculation are included in Attachments 1 and 2 of the permit. C. No grinding of seafood wastes prior to screening is a best management practice which carries out the intent of the Clean Water Act of reducing the amount of pollutants entering the receiving waters. D. Limitations on pH, visible environmental impacts, and receiving water accumulations of seafood wastes are based on Alaska State Water Quality Standards. These standards apply to all discharges from the facility, including process and non - process waters. E. Monitoring is required pursuant to 40 CFR 122.44 (i) and is necessary for determining compliance with permit effluent limitations and to evaluate potential water quality impacts resulting from the discharge. Monitoring frequencies are based on the Agency's determination of the minimum-sampling required to adequately monitor facility performance. Monitoring results will be reported in monthly Discharge Monitoring Reports. F. Total residual chlorine monitoring of process wastewater is required in the proposed permit. Process water is chlorinated prior to use in processing operations. Monitoring of residual. chlorine in the effluent is required to assess the impacts of this pollutant in the receiving environment. G. Processing records are necessary to characterize the type and amount of pollutants discharged to St. Paul Harbor. Other Requirements A. Non- process wastewater may be discharged through conveyances other than outfall 001. These wastewaters include cooling water, boiler water, fresh water pressure relief discharges, and water used in live tanks. This authorization is based on the characteristics of the wastewater from these activities. Page 6 These wastewaters are expected to contain relatively minor concentrations of conventional pollutants (TSS, BOD, oil and grease) and small quantities of solids,and are not expected to adversely affect the receiving waters. B. Dive surveys in Petersburg (EPA, 1987) and Kodiak (EPA, 1988) have documented water quality impacts from seafood processing wastes. In Kodiak, divers observed the presence of anoxic sediments, waste accumulations, and bacterial layers over a large area (at least 75 meters in length) at the mouth of Gibson Cove. Based on these findings, an annual dive survey is required in this permit in order to determine compliance with state water quality standards as well as the extent of the impacts on the receiving water due to the discharge of seafood wastes. The dive is scheduled at the end of the salmon processing season, which is the maximum production period. The proposed permit requires all collected solids to be `disposed of at a reduction facility. Halibut heads, shellfish waste and other EPA approved seafood waste, which are unsuitable for by- product recovery, may be disposed of at the ocean dumping zone. The permittee may dispose of collected solid waste at the . ocean dumping zone provided certification is received from the by- product reduction facility stating the facility is operating at maximum capacity or is closed for repair and /or maintenance and is unable to utilize additional seafood waste.' D. Notification of changes in processing capacity is required to assure that the EPA and ADEC are notified of any . potential increases in the amount of pollutants being - discharged. This will allow an evaluation of the impact of the increased pollutant loading on the receiving waters. E. The re- opener clause, Part I.B.8 of the permit, is required pursuant to 40 CFR 122.62. F. Compliance with Alaska Water Quality Standards is a required condition of the permit pursuant to Section 301 of `the Clean Water Act. Permit No.: AK- 000036 -1 Application No.: AK- 000036 -1 United States Environmental Protection Agency Region. 10 •1200 Sixth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101 AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. $1251 It sect., as amended by the Water Quality Act of 1987, P.L. 100 -4, the "Act", ALL ALASKAN SEAFOODS, INC. (ALKOD'FACILITY) is authorized to discharge from a seafood processing facility located in Kodiak, Alaska.. to receiving waters named St. Paul Harbor, in accordance with .discharge point(s),•effluent limitations, monitoring requirements and other conditions set forth herein. This permit shall become effective This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight, Signed this day of DRAFT Director, Water Division, Region 10 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Page 2 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 0000315 -1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cover Sheet -- Issuance and Expiration Dates I. Effluent Limitations and Monitoring Requirements A. Specific Limitations and Monitoring Requirements B. Other Requirements C. Definitions II. Monitoring, Recording and Reporting Requirements A. Representative Sampling B. Monitoring Procedures C. Reporting of Monitoring Results D. Additional Monitoring by the Permittee E. Records Contents. F. Retention of Records G. Twenty -four Hour Notice of Noncompliance Reporting H. Other Noncompliance Reporting I. Inspection and Entry J. Compliance Schedules II2. Compliance Responsibilities A. Duty to Comply B. Penalties for Violations of Permit Conditions C. Need to Halt or Reduce Activity not a Defense D. Duty to Mitigate E. Proper Operation and Maintenance F. - Removed Substances G. :Bypass of Treatment Facilities H. Upset Conditions I. Toxic Pollutants IV. General Requirements A. Changes in Discharge of Toxic Substances B. Planned Changes C. Anticipated Noncompliance D. Permit Actions E. F. G. Duty to Reapply Duty to Provide Information Other Information H. Signatory Requirements I. Availability of Reports Oil and Hazardous Substance Liability Property Rights K L. M. N. Severability Transfers State Laws ATTACHMENT 1 ATTACHMENT.2 FIGURE 1 ['!RAFT Page 3 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000036 -1 I. EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS A. .Specific Limitations & M9nitorina Requirements. During the effective term of this permit, the permittee is authorized to discharge process wastewater from the processing of bottomfish (such as pollock, and cod),halibut, herring, salmon scallops, and crab to St. Paul Harbor from outfall 001. Treatment of process wastewater prior to discharge shall be accomplished through the use of fine mesh screening (1 mm) or equivalent technology. .Seafood wastes shall not be pulverized, chopped, ground or otherwise altered prior to screening. 1. Processing discharges shall be limited as specified below (limitations are dependent upon the raw products processed on the day samples are collected): Species Total Suspended Solids Oil and Grease Daily Max. Monthly Avg. Daily Max. Monthly Avg. Halibut (and other headed /gutted bottomfish) (lbs /1000 lbs)* Mechanized Bottomfish (lbs /1000 lbs)* 3.1 1.9 4.3 0.56 22 12 9.9 3.9 Mechanized Salmon 44 26 29 11 (lbs/ 10001bs). * Scallops (1bs /10001bs)* 6.1 1.4 7.7 0.24 Herring 2.6 1.6 0.31 0.19 Frozen Whole (lbs /1000 lbs)* Whole Crab and 12 Crab Sections (lbs /1000 lbs).* 3.9 1.3 0.42 Multiple Species (See Attachement 1) (lbs /1000 lbsl* Daily discharges shall be calculated as follows: DRAFT Page 4 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000036 -1 *lbs pollutant /1,000 lbs raw product = (flow. mad) X (conc. of pollutant. ma /1) X (8.340), (total lbs processed during the sampling day) NOTE: An example calculation is included in Attachment 2. 2. Environmental Effects a. The pH shall not be less than 6.5 standard units nor greater than 8.5 standard units. b. There shall be no discharge of floating solids, visible foam, or oily wastes which produce a sheen on the surface of the receiving water. c. There shall be no accumulation of seafood processing wastes on the shoreline. d. There shall be no'accumulation.of wastes on the bottom of the receiving water. 3. Monitoring requirements. Effluent monitoring shall be conducted as follows: Parameter Frequency Sample Type Units Flow Daily 24 -Hour Record mgd TSS Weekly 24 -Hour Composite mg /1 Oil and Grease* Weekly Grab mg /1 Settleable Weekly 24 -Hour Composite ml /1 Solids Residual Chlorine Weekly Grab mg /1 . pH Weekly Grab Standard Units Waste Handling Daily System * Test for oil and grease using the Collins \Tenny Method a. Samples shall be taken from the effluent stream after • treatment and prior to its discharge to the receiving water. b. At least one half of the residual chlorine samples will be taken during or immediately after the plant sanitation procedure. DRAFT Page 5 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000036 -1 c. Daily flow shall be recorded on the same day effluent samples are taken. 4. Receiving Water Inspections The water surface shall be visually inspected each week for floating solids, garbage, grease, foam and visible oil sheen. Results from these inspections shall be reported with each monthly Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR). Processing Records The permittee shall report daily processing volumes as part of the monthly Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR). The following parameters shall be reported: a. Quantity of raw seafood processed per day, by species (pounds). b. Type and quantity of finished product per day, by species (pounds). c. , Estimate of quantity of seafood wastes disposed of via reduction facility (pounds). B. Other Requirements. 1. Sanitary Wastewater Sanitary wastes shall be discharged to the Kodiak municipal treatment facility. The discharge of non - domestic wastewater to the city sanitary wastewater treatment facility is prohibited unless prior approval is obtained from the operator of that facility. 2. Non - Process Wastewater Cooling water, boiler water, freshwater pressure relief discharges, and water used in live tanks may be discharged through conveyances other than outfall 001 provided the limitations in Part I.A.2 are met. DRAFT Page 6 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000036 -1 3. Dive Surveys Underwater dive surveys at outfall 001 shall be conducted . once 'per year. Dive surveys shall be conducted within seven days after the termination of salmon processing but no later than October 15. The diver shall inspect the area under the, dock as well as the outfall along its entire, length. The permittee shall submit a dive survey report to EPA and ADEC no later than thirty days after each dive. The report shall include the following information: a. Location (including distance from shore and compass orientation), depth and condition of the outfall line (including presence, size, and location of any breaks or cracks). b. Water depth at the end of the outfall pipe. c. Inspection of the area at the end of the outfall pipe and documentation of the type, depth, areal extent, estimated volume, and sizes of particles of any waste accumulation. d. A plan view drawing (to scale) indicating the location of the dock, outfall pipe, prominent bottom features such as depressions, pockets, and large rocks, secondary slurry zones, and any area where seafood wastes have accumulated. The drawing shall also include the location, number and species of benthic organisms observed in areas adjacent to the outfall and an indication of whether the organisms observed are alive, dead or stressed. 2 e. Types of substrate in and adjacent to the outfall area.. f. Videotape of dive showing all features listed in parts a, c, and d. 4. Waste Disposal. Practices a. Disposal of all solid processing wastes, with the exception of waste products listed in part I.B.4.b., shall be to a by- product recovery facility, unless the permittee meets the requirements of part I.B.4.C.. b. Halibut heads, shellfish wastes, and other seafood wastes, as approved by EPA, which are unsuitable for processing at a by- product recovery facility may be disposed of at the ocean dumping zone identified in part I.B.4.d., and figure 1 of this permit. DRAFT Page 7 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000036 -1 The permittee may submit a written request, to EPA, to have a species of fish classified as unsuitable for processing at a by- product recovery facility. If EPA approves the permittee's request and classifies a species of fish as unsuitable for processing at a by- product recovery facility, that classification shall remain in effect for the term of this permit. c. In the event the permittee is unable to dispose of collected seafood waste by means of by- product recovery, because the recovery facility was operating at maximum capacity or was closed for repair and /or maintenance and was unable to utilize additional seafood waste, the permittee may dispose of said waste in the ocean dumping zone. The permittee shall provide the following information to EPA with the monthly Discharge Monitoring Report for each disposal activity:. 1. The permittee must obtain certification from the by- product recovery facility stating: • • the recovery facility was operating at maximum capacity or was closed for repair and /or maintenance and was unable to utilize additional seafood waste and • the date the seafood waste was not accepted at the by- product recovery facility. 2. Estimate of quantity of seafood waste disposed of at the ocean dumping zone. 3. Name and address of company responsible for barging said waste to the seafood dumping zone. 4. Latitude and longitude of area where wastes were disposed in the ocean dumping zone. d. The ocean dumping .zone is generally bordered by the Base Line to the east and the fifty (50) fathom line plotted on U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Map No. 8534. DRAFT Page 8 of 20 • Permit No.: AK- 000036 -1 5. Notification of Changes in Capacity The permittee shall give notice to the Director and ADEC of any planned physical alterations or operational changes to the permitted facility which will result in the processing of more than the following amounts of raw seafood in a single day: Soecies Maximum Daily Production Bottomfish 370,000 pounds Crab 150,000 pounds Herring 120,000 pounds Salmon (Hand Butchered) 150,000 pounds Salmon (Mechanized) 180,000 pounds Scallops 30,000 pounds Notification shall be given at least ninety (90) days prior to implementation of the planned changes. 6. Reopener Clause If effluent limitation guidelines applicable to this facility are promulgated that contain limits different from those contained in this permit, the permit shall be modified to reflect the limits in the guidelines. If there is evidence indicating potential or realized impacts on water quality due to the discharge of seafood processing wastewater, the permit may be modified to include different effluent limitations and /or additional monitoring requirements. 7. Alaska Water Quality Standards All discharges shall be in compliance Quality Standards (18 AAC 70). E. Definitions. h Alaska Water 1. "Accumulation" refers to the presence of any measurable amount of seafood waste present on the bottom substrate. For purposes of this permit, measurable is defined as a thickness of one centimeter or more. 2. "Bypass" means the intentional diversion of waste streams from any portion of a treatment facility. Page 9 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000036 -1 3. "Daily Discharge" means the discharge of a pollutant measured during a calendar day or any 24 -hour period that reasonably represents the calendar day for purposes of sampling. For pollutants with limitations expressed in units of mass, the "daily discharge" is calculated as the total mass of the pollutant discharged over the day. For pollutants with limitations expressed in other units of measurement, the "daily discharge" is calculated as the average measurement of the pollutant over the day. 4. "Daily Maximum" discharge means the highest allowable "da discharge ". "Grab" sample is a single sample or measurement taken at a specific time or over as short a period of time as is feasible. 6. "Monthly Average" see Attachment 2, page 3 of this. permit. 7. "Quantity of Waste" is calculated as follows: uantity of Waste = (Quantity of Raw Seafood) - (Quantity of Finished Product). 8 "Severe Property Damage" means substantial physical damage to property, damage to 'the treatment facilities which causes them.to become inoperable, or substantial and permanent loss of natural resources which can reasonably be expected to occur in the absence of a bypass. Severe property damage does not mean economic loss caused by delays in production. 9. "24 -Hour Composite" sample shall mean a flow proportioned.. mixture of not less than 8 discrete aliquots. Each aliquot shall be a grab sample of not less than 100 ml and shall be collected and stored in accordance with procedures prescribed in the most recent edition of Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 10. "Upset" means an exceptional incident in which there is unintentional and temporary noncompliance with technology based permit effluent limitations because of factors beyond the reasonable control of the permittee. An upset does not include noncompliance to the extent caused by operational error, improperly designed treatment facilities, inadequate treatment facilities, lack of preventive maintenance, or careless or improper operation. y DRAFT Page 10 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000036 -1 II. MONITORING, RECORDING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS A. Representative Sampling. Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirements established under Part I shall be collected from the effluent stream prior to discharge into the receiving waters. Samples and measurements shall be representative of the volume and nature of the monitored discharge. B. Monitoring Procedures. Monitoring must be conducted according to test procedures approved under 40 CFR Part 136, unless other test procedures have been specified in this permit. C. Reporting of Monitoring Results. Monitoring results shall be summarized each month on the Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) form (EPA No. 3320 -1). The reports shall be submitted monthly and are to be postmarked by the 10th day of the following month. Legible copies of these, and all other reports, shall be signed and certified in accordance with the requirements of Part IV.H.. Signatory Requirements, and submitted to the Director, Water Division and the State agency at the following addresses: original to: United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 10 120.0 Sixth Avenue, WD -135 Seattle, Washington 98101 copy to: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC) Southcentral Region . 3601. 'C' Street, Suite 133.4 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 D. Additional Monitoring by the Permittee. If the permittee monitors any pollutant more frequently than required by this permit, using test procedures approved under 40 CFR 136 or as specified in this permit, the results of this monitoring shall be included in the calculation and reporting of the data submitted in the DMR. Such increased frequency shall also be indicated. E. Records Contents. Records of monitoring information shall include: 1. The date, exact place, and time of sampling or measurements; 2. The individual(s) who performed the sampling or measurements; - 3. The date(s) analyses were performed; 4. The individual(s) who performed the analyses; 5. The analytical techniques or methods used; and 6. The results of such anal es. DIkAFT Page 11 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000036 -1 F. Retention of Records,. The permittee shall retain records of all monitoring information, including all calibration and maintenance records and all original strip chart recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation, copies of all reports required by this permit, and records of all data used to complete the application for this permit, for a period of at least three years from the date of the sample, measurement, report or application. This period may be extended by request of the Director or ADEC at any time. Data collected on-site, copies of Discharge Monitoring Reports, and a copy of this NPDES permit must be maintained on -site during the duration of activity at the permitted location. Twenty -four Hour Notice of Noncompliance Reporting. 1. The following occurrences of noncompliance shall be reported by,telephone within 24 hours from the time the permittee becomes aware of the circumstances: a. Any noncompliance which may endanger health or the environment; b. Any unanticipated bypass which exceeds any effluent limitation in the permit (See Part III.G.. Bvpass of Treatment Facilities.) ;. c. d. Any upset which exceeds any effluent limitation in the permit (See .Part III.H.. Upset Conditions.); or Violation of a maximum daily discharge limitation for any of the pollutants listed in the permit to be reported within 24 hours. A written submission shall also be provided within five days of the time that the permittee becomes aware of the circumstances. The written submission shall contain: a. .A description of the noncompliance and its cause; b. The period of noncompliance, including exact dates and times; c. The estimated time noncompliance is, expected to continue if it has not been corrected; and d. Steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent reoccurrence of the noncompliance. The Director may waive the written report on a case -by -case basis if the oral report has been received within 24 hours by the Water Compliance Section in Seattle, Washington, by phone, (206) 553 -1213. flP APT Page 12 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000036 -1 4. Reports shall be submitted to the addresses in Part II.C.. Renortina of Monitoring Results. H. Other Noncompliance Reporting. Instances of noncompliance not required to be reported within 24 hours shall be reported at the time that monitoring reports for Part II.C. are submitted. The reports shall contain the information listed in Part II.G.2. I. Inspection and Entry. The permittee shall allow the Director, ADEC, or an authorized representative (including an authorized contractor acting as a representative of the Administrator), upon the presentation of credentials and other documents as may be required by law, to: 1. Enter upon the permittee's premises where a regulated facility or activity is located or conducted, or where records must be kept under the conditions of this permit;. 2. Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the conditions of this permit; 3. Inspect at reasonable times any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and control equipment), practices, or operations regulated or required under this permit; and 4. Sample or monitor at reasonable times, for the purpose of assuring permit compliance or as otherwise authorized by the Act, any substances or parameters at any location. J. Compliance Schedules. Reports of compliance or noncompliance with, or any progress reports on interim and final requirements contained in any Compliance. Schedule of this permit (Part 1), shall be submitted no later than 10 days following each schedule date. COMPLIANCE RESPONSIBILITIES A. Duty to Comply. The permittee must comply with all conditions of this permit. Any permit noncompliance constitutes a violation of the Act and is grounds for enforcement action; for permit termination, revocation and.reissuance, or modification; or for denial of a permit renewal application. The permittee shall give advance notice to. the Director and ADEC of any planned changes in the permitted facility or activity which may result in noncompliance with permit requirements. B. Penalties for Violations of Permit Conditions,. 1. Civil Penalty. The Act provides that any person who violates a permit condition implementing Sections 301, 302, 306, 307, 308, 318, or 405 of the Act shall be subject to a civil penalty, not to exceed $25,000 per day for each violation. DRAFT Page 13 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000036 -1 2. Criminal Penalties: a. Negligent Violations. The Act provides that any person who negligently violates a.permit condition implementing Sections 301, 302, 306, 307, 308, 318, or 405 of the Act shall be punished by. a fine of not less than $2,500 nor more than $25,000 per day of violation, or by imprisonment for not more than 1 year, or by both. b. Knowing Violations. The Act provides that any person who knowingly violates a permit condition implementing Sections 301, 302, 306, 307, 308, 318, or 405 of the Act shall be punished by a fine of not less than $5,000 nor more than $50,000 per day of violation, or by imprisonment for not more than 3 years, or by both. c. Knowing Endangerment. The Act provides that any person who knowingly violates a permit condition implementing Sections 301, 302, 306, 307, 308, 318, or 405 of the Act, and who knows at that time that he thereby places another person in imminent danger of death or serious bodily injury, shall, upon conviction, be subject to a fine of not more than $250,000 or imprisonment of not more than 15 years, or both. A person which is an organization shall, upon conviction of violating this subparagraph, be subject to a fine of not more than $1,000,000. False Statements. The Act provides that any person who knowingly makes any false material statement, representation, or certification in any application, record, report, plan, or other document filed or required to be maintained under this Act or who knowingly falsifies, tampers with, or renders inaccurate any monitoring device or method required to be maintained under this Act, shall upon conviction, be punished by a fine of not more that $10,000, or by imprisonment for not more than 2 years, or by both. Except. as provided in permit conditions in Part III.G.. Bypass of, Treatment Facilities and Part III.H.. Upset Conditions, nothing in this permit shall be construed to relieve the permittee of the civil or criminal penalties for noncompliance. C. Need to Halt or Reduce Activity not a Defense. It shall not be a defense for a permittee in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the conditions of this permit. D. Duty to Mitigate. The permittee shall take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any discharge in violation of this permit which has a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting human health or the environment. rsD A CT Page 14 of 20 Permit No.:' AK- 000036 -1 E. Proper Operation. and Maintenance. The permittee shall at all times properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems of treatment and control (and related appurtenances) which are installed or used by the permittee to achieve compliance with the conditions of this permit. Proper operation and maintenance also includes adequate laboratory controls and appropriate quality assurance procedures. This provision requires the operation of . back -up or auxiliary facilities or similar systems which are installed by a permittee only when the operation is necessary to achieve compliance with the conditions of the permit. F. Removed Substances. Solids, sludges, filter backwash, or other pollutants removed in the course of treatment or control of wastewater shall be disposed of in a manner such as to prevent any pollutant from such materials from entering navigable waters. G. Bypass of Treatment Facilities: 1. Bypass not exceeding limitations. The permittee may allow any bypass to occur which does not cause effluent limitations•to be exceeded, but only if it also is for essential maintenance to assure efficient operation. These bypasses are not subject to the provisions of paragraphs 2 and 3 of this section. 2. Notice: a. Anticipated bypass. If the permittee knows in advance of the need for a bypass, it shall submit prior notice, if possible at least 10 days before the date of the bypass. b. Unanticipated bypass. The permittee shall submit notice of an unanticipated bypass as required under Part II.G.. Twenty -four Hour Notice of Noncompliance Reporting. 3. Prohibition of bypass. a. Bypass is prohibited and the Director or ADEC may take enforcement action against a permittee for a bypass, unless: (1) The bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life, personal injury, or severe property damage; DRAFT Page 15 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000036 -1 There were no feasible alternatives to the bypass, such as the use of auxiliary treatment facilities, retention of untreated wastes,, or maintenance during normal periods of equipment downtime. This condition is not satisfied if adequate back -up equipment should have been installed in the exercise of reasonable engineering judgment to prevent a bypass which occurred during normal . periods of equipment downtime or preventive maintenance; and The permittee submitted notices as required under paragraph 2 of this section. b. The Director and ADEC may approve an anticipated bypass, after considering its adverse effects, if the Director and ADEC determine that it will meet the three conditions listed above in paragraph 3.a. of this section. H. Upset Conditions. 1. Effect of an upset. An upset constitutes an affirmative defense to an action brought for . noncompliance with such technology based permit effluent limitations if the requirements of paragraph 2 of this section are met. No determination made during administrative review of claims that noncompliance was caused by upset, and before an action for noncompliance, is final administrative action subject to judicial review. 2. Conditions necessary for a demonstration of upset. A permittee who wishes to establish the affirmative defense of upset shall demonstrate, through properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs, or other relevant evidence that: a. An upset occurred and that the cause(s) of the upset; b. The permitted facility was operated; the permittee can identify at the time being properly c. The permittee submitted notice of the upset as required under Part II.G., Twenty -four Hour Notice of Noncompliance Reporting; and d. The permittee complied with any remedial measures required under Part III.D., Duty to Mitigate. 3. Burden of proof. In any enforcement proceeding, the permittee seeking to establish the occurrence of an upset has the burden of proof. rr P _ d Page 16 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000036 -1 I. Toxic Pollutants. The permittee shall comply with effluent standards or prohibitions established under Section 307(a) of the Act for toxic pollutants within the time provided in the regulations that establish those standards or prohibitions, even if the permit has not yet been modified to incorporate the requirement. IV. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS A. Changes in Discharge of Toxic Substances. Notification shall be provided to the Director and ADEC as soon as the permittee knows of, Or has reason to believe: 1. That any activity has occurred or will occur which would result in the discharge, on a routine or frequent basis, of . any toxic pollutant which is not limited in the permit, if that discharge will exceed the highest of the following "notification levels ": a. One hundred micrograms per liter (100 ug /1); b.. Two hundred micrograms per liter (200 ug /1) for acrolein.and acrylonitrile, five hundred micrograms per liter (500 ug /1) for 2,4- dinitrophenol and for 2- methyl -4, 6- dinitrophenol; and one milligram per liter (1 mg /1) for antimony;. c. Five (5) times the maximum concentration value reported for that pollutant in the permit application in accordance with 40 CFR 122.21(g)(7); or The level established by the Director in accordance with 40 CFR 122.44(f). 2. That any activity has occurred or will occur which would result in any discharge, on a non - routine or infrequent basis, of a toxic pollutant, which is not limited in the permit, if'that discharge will exceed the highest of the following "notification levels ": a. Five hundred micrograms per liter (500 ug /1); b. One milligram per liter (1 mg /1) for antimony; Ten (10) times the maximum concentration value reported for that pollutant in the permit application in accordance with 40 CFR 122.21(g)(7); or d. The level established by the Director in accordance with 40 CFR 122.44(f). DRAFT Page 17 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000036 -1 planned Changes. The permittee shall give notice to the Director and ADEC as soon as possible of any planned physical alterations or additions to the permitted facility. Notice is required only when: 1. The alteration or addition to a permitted facility may meet one of the criteria for determining whether a facility is a new source as determined in 40 CFR 122.29(b); or 2. The alteration or . addition could significantly change the nature or increase the quantity of pollutants discharged. This notification applies to pollutants which are subject neither to effluent limitations in the permit, nor to notification requirements under Part IV.A.1. C. Anticipated Noncompliance. The permittee shall also give advance notice to the Director and ADEC of any planned changes in the permitted facility or activity which may result in noncompliance with permit requirements. D. Permit Actions. This permit may be modified, revoked and reissued, or terminated for cause. The filing of a request by the permittee for a permit modification, revocation and reissuance, or termination, or a notification of planned changes or anticipated noncompliance, does not stay any permit condition. Duty to Reapply. If the permittee wishes to continue an activity regulated by this permit after the expiration date of this permit, the permittee must apply for and obtain a new permit. The application should be submitted at least 180 days before the expiration date of this permit. F. Duty to Provide Information. The permittee shall furnish to the Director and.ADEC, within a reasonable time, any information which the Director or ADEC may request to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and reissuing, or terminating this permit, or to determine compliance with this permit. The permittee shall also furnish to the Director or ADEC, upon request, copies of records required to be kept by this permit. G. Other Information. When the permittee becomes aware that it failed to submit any relevant facts in a permit application, or submitted incorrect information in a permit application or any report to the Director or ADEC, it shall promptly submit such facts or information. GRAFT H. Page 18 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000036 -1 Signatory rements Requi. All applications, reports or information submitted to the Director and ADEC shall be signed and certified. 1. All permit applications shall be signed as follows: a. For a corporation: by a responsible corporate officer. b. For a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the proprietor, respectively. c. For a municipality, state, federal, or other public agency: by either .a principal executive officer or ranking elected official. 2. All reports required by the permit and other information requested by the Director or ADEC shall be signed by a person described above or by a duly authorized representative of that person. A person is a duly authorized representative only if: a. The authorization is made in writing by a person described above and submitted to the Director and ADEC, and b. The authorization specified either an individual or a position having responsibility for the overall operation of the regulated facility or activity, such. as the position of plant manager, operator of a well or . a well field, superintendent, position of equivalent responsibility, or an individual or position having overall responsibility for environmental matters for the company. (A duly authorized representative may thus be either a named individual or any individual occupying a named position.) Changes to authorization. If an authorization under paragraph IV.H.2. is no longer accurate because a different individual or position has responsibility for the overall operation �f the facility, a new authorization satisfying the requirements of paragraph IV.H.2. must be submitted to the Director and ADEC prior to or together with any reports, information, or applications to be signed by an authorized representative. DRAFT I. Page 19 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000036 -1 4. Certification. Any person signing a document under this section shall make the following certification: "I certify under penalty of law. that this-document and • all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in. accordance with a system.designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on' my • inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, .or those persons directly responsible.for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief,- true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for. knowing violations." Availability of Reports. Except for data determined to be confidential under 40 CFR Part 2, all reports prepared in accordance with the . terms of this permit shall be available for public inspection at the offices of the Director and ADEC. As required by the Act, permit applications, permits and effluent data shall not be considered confidential. J. Oil and Hazardous Substance Liability. Nothing in this permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal action or relieve the permittee from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties to which the permittee is or may subject under Section 311 of the Act. K. Property Rights. The issuance of this permit does not convey any property rights of any sort, or any exclusive privileges, nor does it authorize any injury to private property or any invasion of personal rights, nor any infringement of federal, state or local laws or regulations. L. Severability. The provisions of this permit are severable, and if any provision of this permit., or the application of any provision of this permit to any circumstance, is held invalid, the application of such provision to other, circumstances, and the remainder of this permit, shall not be affected thereby. M. Transfers. This permit may be automatically transferred to a new permittee if: 1. The current permittee notifies the Director at least 30 days in advance of the proposed transfer date; 2. The notice includes a written agreement between the existing and new permittees containing a specific date for transfer of permit responsibility, coverage, and liability between them; and DRAFT Page 20 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000036 -1 3. The Director does not notify the existing permittee and the proposed new permittee of his or her intent to modify, or revoke and reissue the permit. If this notice is not received, the transfer is effective on the date specified in the agreement mentioned in paragraph 2 above. State Laws. Nothing in this permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal action or relieve the permittee from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties established pursuant to any applicable state law or regulation under authority preserved by Section 510 of the Act. DRAFT ATTACHMENT 1 Limitations for Multiple Species Processing Effluent limitations for the processing of multiple species are derived using the following "generic" equation: Limit in lbs /1000 lbs = (Bottomfish Limit)(% Bottomfish) + (Crab Limit)( %.Crab) + (Herring Limit)(% Herring) + (HB Salmon Limit)(% HB Salmon) + (Mech Salmon Limit)(% Mech Salmon) + (Scallop Limit)(% Scallop) where, % Bottomfish % Crab % Herring % HB Salmon Mech Salmon % Scallop and, • Bottomfish Limit Crab Limit Herring Limit = Amount of bottomfish processed divided by the total, amount of seafood processed = (Amount of Bottomfish): / (Amount of Raw Seafood) = Amount of crab processed divided by the total amount of seafood processed = (Amount of Crab) / (Amount of Raw Seafood) = Amount of herring processed divided by the total amount of seafood processed = (Amount of Herring) / (Amount of Raw Seafood) = Amount of hand - butchered salmon divided by the total amount of seafood processed = (Amount of HB Salmon) / (Amount of Raw Seafood) = Amount of mechanized salmon divided by the total amount of seafood processed = (Amount of Mech. Salmon) / (Amount of Raw Seafood) = Amount of scallop processed divided by the total amount of seafood processed = (Amount of Scallop) / (Amount of Raw Seafood) = Effluent processing = Effluent = Effluent processing limitation in Part I.A.1. for bottomfish limitation in Part I.A.1. for processing limitation in Part I.A. for herring 2 HB Salmon Limit = Effluent limitation in Part I.A. for hand- butchered salmon Mech Salmon Limit = Effluent limitation in Part I.A. for mechanized salmon processing Scallop Limit = Effluent limitation in Part I.A. for scallop processing Two pollutants are limited in the permit, TSS and Oil and Grease. Each pollutant is limited on a monthly average and daily maximum basis. Therefore, by substituting the limitation for each species in the generic equation above, we can generate the following four limitations for Multiple Species processing: TSS - Monthly Average TSS - Daily Maximum Oil and Grease - Monthly Average Oil and Grease - Daily Maximum TSS - Monthly Average Limitation = 12(% Bottomfish). + 3.9(0 Crab) + 24(% Herring) + 1.6(% HB Salmon) + 26(% Mech Salmon) + 1.4(% Scallop) NOTE: Processing percentages are calculated over the month TSS - Daily Maximum Limitation = 22(% Bottomfish) + 12(% Crab) + 32(% Herring) + 2.6(% HB Salmon) + 44(% Mech Salmon) + 6.6(% Scallop) NOTE: Processing percentages are calculated over the sampling day Oil and Grease - Monthly Average Limitation = 3.9(% Bottomfish.) + 0.42(% Crab) + 10(% Herring) + 0.19(% HB Salmon) +.11(% Mech Salmon) + 0.24(% Scallop) NOTE: Processing percentages are calculated over the month Oil and Grease - Daily Maximum Limitation = 9.9(% Bottomfish) + 1.3(% Crab) + 27(% Herring). + 0.31(% HB Salmon) + 29(% Mech Salmon) + 7.7(% Scallop) NOTE: Processing percentages are calculated over the sampling day. These limitations shall be calculated and included in an attachment,to the monthly DMRs. ATTACHMENT 2 Example of Calculations to Determine Compliance Witt' the Permit Limits These are sample calculations of plant discharge (lbs. /1000 lbs) values which shall be compared to limitations in Part I.A.1. to determine compliance. Given: Discharges were sampled four days during the month of June 1988. Hand - butchered salmon and bottomfish were processed. The following table provides data for the month of June 1988. pounds of Raw Product Date Flow. MGD TSS Conc..mg /1 HE Salmon Bottomfish 6/2/88 0.075 36.8 - - - 10,000 6/9/88 0.098 41.5 - - - 23,070 6/16/88 0.127 39.4 6,155 60,000 6/27/88 0.077 .47.5 1,210 Daily Maximum Calculations Step 1.. Determine the Daily Maximum discharge for TSS for each day samples are collected. Daily Maximum discharge (in lbs /1000 lbs) equals the measured effluent flow (mgd), multiplied by the measured effluent concentration (mg /1), multiplied by a conversion factor (8,340), and divided by the total amount of raw seafood processed (lbs). Note that the flow, concentration, and amount of seafood processed shall be measured over the same 24 -hour period. Daily Maximum = (flow)(concentration)(8.340) (Daily Production) Therefore, 6/2/88, Daily Maximum = ( 0. 075mgd)(36.8mg/1)(8,340)/10,000 lbs = 2.30 lbs /1.000 lbs 6/9/88 Daily Maximum = ( 0. 098mgd)(41.5mg/1)(8,340)/23,070 lbs = 1.47 lbs /1.000 lbs 6/16/88 Daily Maximum = ( 0. 127mgd)(39.4mg/1)(8,340)/66,155 lbs = 0.63 lbs /1.000 lbs DRAFT 6/27/88 Daily Maximum = ( 0 .077mgd)(47.5mg/1)(8,340)/1,210 lbs = 25.2 lbs /1.000 lbs Daily Maximum calculations shall be made for each day that samples are collected. . Step 2. Determine compliance with applicable daily maximum effluent limitations. To determine compliance, the above calculated Daily Maximum discharge value shall be compared to the applicable Daily Maximum limit in Part I.A.1. of the permit. The applicable limitation. from Part I.A.1. is dependent upon whether only hand - butchered salmon, only bottomfish, or both hand - butchered salmon and bottomfish are processed on the day of sampling. Since only bottomfish is processed on 6/2/88 and 6/9/88, these calculated daily maximum discharge values shall be compared to the daily maximum TSS limitation in Part I.A.1., for bottomfish, of 22 lbs /1,000 lbs. The same type of comparison can be made for the 6/27/88 calculation where only hand- butchered salmon is processed. Because more than one species of seafood is processed on 6/16/88, the calculated daily maximum TSS discharged must be compared to a variable limitation which is derived based upon a proportion of each seafood species processed. This variable Daily Max TSS, Limitation is calculated as follows: Limitation = 2.6(% HE Salmon) + 22(% Bottomfish) = 2.6(6,155/66,155) + 22(60,000/66,155) = 20.2 lbs /1000.lbs This equation is defined in detail in Attachment 1 of the permit. CONCLUSION. DATE TSS DAILY MAX TSS DAILY MAX LIMITATION, (LBS /1000 LBS) (PART I.A.1. OF PERMIT) (LBS /1000 LBS) 6/2/88 2.30 22 6/9/88 1.47 22 6/16/88 0.63 20.2 6/27/88 25.20 2.6 From the above information, it can be seen that the facility was not in . compliance on 6/27/88. DRAFT Monthly Averacte Calculations Step 1. Determine the Average Monthly discharge for TSS (for June 1988) The Average Monthly TSS discharge equals the summation of all Daily Maximum discharge values calculated during the time period covered by the DMR in question (June), divided by the total production. Therefore, Monthly Average [(0.075 mgd)(36.8 mg /1) + (0.098 mgd)(41.5 mg /1) + (0.127 mgd) (39.4 mg /1) + - (0.077 mgd) (47.5 mg/1)] x (8,340)/(10,000 + 23,070 + 66,155 + 1,210) = 1.3 lbs /1000 lbs Monthly Average calculations shall be made each month. Step 2. Determine compliance with applicable monthly average effluent limitations. To determine compliance, the above calculated Monthly Average discharge value shall be compared to the applicable Monthly Average limitation in Part I.A.1. of the permit. The applicable limitation from Part I.A.1. is dependent upon whether only hand - butchered salmon, only bottomfish, or both hand- butchered salmon . and bottomfish are processed on any day that samples are collected, during the month in question. For this example, since both hand - butchered salmon and bottomfish are processed during the sampling period in the month of June the above calculated Monthly Average TSS discharge must be compared to a variable limitation which is based upon a proportion of each seafood species processed. This variable Monthly Average TSS limitation is calculated as follows: Limitation = 1.6(% HB Salmon) + 12(% Bottomfish) = 1.6(7,365/100,435) + 12(93,070/100,435) = 11:2 lbs /1.000 lbs ion is defined in detail in Attachment 1 of the permit. This eaua DATE. CONCLUSION. TSS MONTHLY AVG (LBS /1000 LBS) 6/2/88 THRU • 6/27/88 1.3 'TSS MONTHLY AVG LIMITATION PART I.A.1: OF PERMIT (LBS/1000 LBS) DRAFT 11.2 • 4 From the above information, it can be seen that the facility was in compliance for the TSS Monthly Average limitations. NOTE: The above example only examines the TSS results. The same calculations apply to Oil & Grease. Calculations shall be made during each month and submitted with the DMRs for the month in question. DRAFT aor 4 . • • e • • I 14.84,9 "Sal. /41; ?V m . • -1 isp :*e•to?".';• tl 11111• * a-4 as • iji• I. A,. 1.. • • . • % Jails is:: is !A:1m 44 • . II - 441 I I - .. .% : , ... . la 10 ... 1 - ii., • ;■ * ' as • - ; 11 . 43. is sa • a ..6.1.1ge0 0 1 11 Alfoe-.1;13... 13 1123 44'7111 1. !.: ••• 41 -........... 4... • q lt `!I 33 88 331-'41.1014 CPO A A • . a. • e - 1. II 11.:011:.:4**‘• 394iis. ••• . . ' • ..0A ...a; 1 41......bl• II 80 • • :4 .s...: a.-74. 4.. 471, 11 a, ::4:14- :,14 - 4 • la . • I I,- 1•4 9 .* ..4: - as 19 84 1 ;la ye; ,, .), SO as „ :_• :. * . al to. :II i:-. •311 sil Is/ ,b.., as . •..• ,. ...,.• Irs 81•611, 4.• I 1%; • .0. •• I )1 • 82 •3 I t • • • I 13. 40 • ••61' at si It 61 • *3'; • C•041.1■•■ I' 4 • slob ., • • i. • le 6 !•:.• • •Or " •.. t. -▪ 64- I /9 la 11- 11 • ,• • 6 1% n..„11,,e48....;i • • ••• so' 14 . •1 :4/4 I 04.4 • : • *--.4;• Z 19 • • c:i. • le :•• 1.61:-• 13 la 1•;•••• asnyamtig 4 •-' 3 11 ral! • _ • 11 • • loot .• ea 9 ..f..•.:4? ▪ 4 • , • -.3(43 7.9 • 32 c • -.4 -If 3/ 41 Ill as of:, •Ja:ar 4•«; 31 W 111 F.,•: ■•5,4,14 gas 111 :if .41 ir,;.$ • al..4 14 Of 7.1 Ali OS 6613•11 II 1% ..• 3111 . 414.6 iVasoeiliefi ell it ••j!..::••• •• 8..1.41-0/ :I 1 I 1 a'h 00% 311° "ft af 138 Ira • lo ', et.4,. _4, , As RS ,..., 111. •. °I 34 31 164(•-••••••7,•-•g.le9 g • 33 ow. lass . • WS . la 1) ss • it se . 13 • . • 6 .ge 4.16: If • ss 3 it"1 91,4:47;-!Ki is 12 • aso so :e. *A ss 36 MS 31 411. I -• 4.v • • 33 " 10 r • .. ....I: • ••••• I6 Di •••••;;;;:e • la al • 34 39 Mt% ere le 19 41.,....a4 as 39 11 or., sta...4 0.0 (.11 SO la 6$ • • aa . 64 104 Na' *Witt I 01. V.0 ea • 311 es • es . . in to • - r 1 ....4.:. ? i N 13 *34 • ...) (1/4, „Ali A •.* *3. 1 116 i. I - 6.. la 19 . 15 .03 is 16 I. . 1$ s 06 el% 25 • • 0.. e$ •. '• it ." • e " a ev 1 ( $ i 1. SE. Af). F i O OD p. I• M IC . . ZON" sMa P Si I)• A 4.40000 4%,6,44o 44 0/ iel 13 :an. u • 4 ...." • It sa 99 --, • • ?*i ' 411 *so. en sai 34 ill II 93 024414 ally 4r-L11, • IS 3/ •••• e•ea 14 •I) 0 rj, 24 ' (1:4264 ff I . JIT • I Ask .1.1-41m- b $$ ira I • ..49 61 01 O . • / • 3/ RR • 04 so SS 3) • • 49 • • 14 .• :30611••••41111 jx AP• • .• ele 99 ...„ 4.4 048 $ • •• •I4 • ilk I t • 13, : • • ?e" 11 • . as; s; ..••••:;f*.•-•'.•11' If •••••4;..?." 84* 44 31 • 6•7111. *SI 11 Ili . .$ • .4 41- • 1111 44. or 20 340. 19 A. 11 I/ 69 48 (4%o • • to J. • ■ •••,. r 21 11 44 34 ' aim 14 .4 r /". • as • 24 " t-ii as .43 .r-zg 24 so 44. . •1 • KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH Community Development 710 Mill Bay Road (Room 204), Kodiak, Alaska 99615-6340 - Phone: (907) 486 -5736, extension 255 or 254 ZONING COMPLIANCE PERMIT Permit #: V 0 z -1 / �-- 1. 2. 3. Property Owner /Applicant: i4i/ irk L. c:es /Gsv 12 • G- Number and size of parklrg spaces required (ensile identification of parking spaces is required - Yes: X : -- r Mailing Address: 1 %./. nu it -9. , Phone: Tei5(c7 — 2-e6 l2(1) 1re_ / Qov zcn Legal Description: Lo fs GA a-4 4- /M1_ ( 9 P iv,..,: Li... 64'4i, i t ` `� r' �, N Z _ i §i- ` •de' Wme �s� /�'— i .2 — [-a4 .rd�s �4w. '"°ma Street Address: l� ( col G.4-1,-,-, �i F.Iato(kop�` —c,.• ., Tax Code A: 9-(l ' e�obto 2 3 .� /�,x30- Tin . . Plat related requirements (e.g., plat notes, easements, subdivision conditions, etc.): Description of Existing,Prope rcunentzoning: .a -- Cil..d0ti5ckr (...-.P /ISU _ Mlnlmrm Required Lot Area: ').-8 d 00 4 Width: Other requirements (e.g., zero lot line, additional setbacks, projections into yards, screening, etc.): Y <✓ve.G.o 1,vura— Actin Let Area 1 3% Width: e W s S (, S 7. �f, jg I frnlnarm Required Setbacks: Sides: a.br or C Ti e ej YW' kfrvl�7JP_ /,.! � Front: I v ` / Rear �iQ a'. : / Coastal Management Program Applicable Pollees (check appropriate category) - Residential: Business: Malcom Building Height A :. .' . ... Industrial: X Other (list): Lt ( Use and size of existing structures on the lot r Yti 9 � 1`" � "��""'�t'� is the proposed action cgnslsterrt with the KB Coastal Management Program? - Yes: J�-� No: ,5 0 5 2j 5-2-D � J 4 l e r . c . f - - s ' VV If the proposed action conflicts with t e Coastal Management Program polities, mach a sheet that notes the policy(ies), desaibes the conflict(s), and specifies conditions b mitigate the conflict(s): Attachment - Yes: No: // 4. Description of proposed action (attach site plan): 2 , / . Z c7 r w() (z ' /( 5 f 0Y _ SS • !! - ,, - _4 - ,/ A. +D .bus {yam v,,!. + Jc il: r,.- 131b- (15-_, A) L 5 d O. / r`74771,-- ( /h o VS (. i) c fi ,, / (',/6691) C,3- J .._ to A, , . . Jr. Applicant Ce ► Lion: I hereby certify that !will comply with the provisions of the Kodiak island Borough Code and that 1 have the authority to certify this as the properly owner, or as a representative of the property owner. I agree to have IdentI - z'" r msrlters • • the field for verification of setbacks. By 1 ike Date: ..5 / 7 9/ Tolle: ./11?.///9A./ f A4i a� /A Supporting' ocumerrts alt led Cheek): to plan: , n As-built survey: , Other (list): arc l (k. C44,1.. a 6. Community Development staff for zoning, by: , _..c . f Date: S ( �i r Tide: QC/ %. Fire Chief (City of Kodiak, Fire Dbtrlcl 81 (Bayside), Womens Bay Fire District! approval for UFC (Sections 10.207 and 10.301C) by: Date: $. Driveway Permit (Slide, cry of Kodiak, Borough) issued by: Date: 9. Septic system PLAN approved by: Date: MEMORAN UM StatE of Alaska DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME FROM: 02-001 A (Rev 11-85) Patty Bielawski Project Coordinator Division of Governmental Coordination Office of Management and Budget C. Way (e Dolezal Habitat Biologist Region II Habitat Division Department of Fish and Game DATE: February 25, 1991 FILE NO.: TELEPHONE NO.: 267-2284 SUBJECT: All AiaskanS0afoods St. Paul Harbor 25 SID AK901220-09A COE No. N-820.558 The Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G) has reviewed the tideland fill project referenced above. The project entails the placement of 7,500 cubic yards of pit run gravel and 500 cubic yards of riprap below the high tide line in the Near Island channel on Kodiak Island. The purpose of the project is to provide an upland surface for product handling associated with the adjacent fish processing facility. We have no objection to the project as proposed. Pursuant to 6 AAC 80.010(b), the ADF&G recommends that this project be found consistent with the Standards of the Alaska Coastal Management Program and the Kodiak Island Borough Coastal Management Program. We appreciate the opportunity to comment. If you have any specific questions, please contact me at 267-2333. cc: D. Kohler, COE T. Rumfelt, DEC V. Gilbert, DNR/DLWM P. Probasco, ADF&G D. McGillivary, USFWS P. North, EPA B. Smith, NMFS L. Freed, Kodiak Island Borough CRSA RECFWED FEB 2 7 1991 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT ST OFFICE DIVISION OF SOUTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE 431 NORTH FRANKLIN P.O. BOX AW, SUITE 101 JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811-0165 PHONE: (907) 465-3562 LP_II Li CN-) ft-)\ 0111410E OF THE GOVERNOR OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION SOUTHCENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE 3601 V' STREET SUITE 370 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503-5930 PHONE: (907) 561-6131 All-Alaska Seafoods, Inc.- ATTN: Gary Taylor 101 Marine Way Kodiak, AK 99615 SUBJECT: -ST. PAUL HARBOR 25 - MODIFICATION STATE I.D. NO AK901220-09A WALTER J. NICKEL, GOVERNOR CENTRAL OFFICE RO. BOX AW JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811-0165 PHONE: (907) 465-3562 NORTHERN REGIONAL OFFICE 675 SEVENTH AVENUE STATION H FAIRBANKS, ALASKA 99701-4596 PH0NE:(907j 4,51-281p 9 9 1 February Dear Mr. Taylor: The Division of Governmental Coordination (DGC) is currently coordinating the state's review of the above referenced project. The review was extended January 3, 1991, pending receipt of a specific plan drawing. I have received your plan drawing and am circulating it to review participants for their comments. 1 am reestablishing the review timeframe as follows: Comments Due: February 22 Notification to You: March 1 Decision Deadline: March 5 By copy of this letter I am advising review participants and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers of this schedule. Thank you for your cooperation with the Alaska Coastal Management Program. SiAlgerely, /;-- P/atty Proj cc: Greg Curney, DNR Tim Rumfelt, DEC Wayne Dolezal, DFG moll\restrt\mb ielawski ct Review Coordinator 1VE FEB 1 9 1991 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN1 Mr. Gary Taylor St. Paul Harbor 25 - Modification State I. D. No. AK901220-09A cc: Linda Freed, KIB John Leeds, COE moll\restrt\mb February 14, 1991 all ALASKAN SEAFOODS, INC. 101 MARINE WAY KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 ( 907) 486-3266 1/31/91 MS. PATTY BIELAWSKI PROJECT REVIEW COORDINATOR OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET P.O. BOX AW JUNEAU AK. 99811-0165 DEAR PATTY, ENCLOSED YOU WILL FIND A DIAGRAM OF THE FOOTPRINT AND SPECIFICATIONS YOU REQUESTED OF THE PROPOSED FILL MATERIAL WRITTEN IN ON THE BOTTOM. THE SLOPE OF THE FACE OF THE RIPRAP IS ALSO WRITTEN IN ON THE BOTTOM OF THIS DIAGRAM. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED ANY FURTHER MATERIAL PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CALL ME. GARY F. TAYLOR OFFICE Or MANAGEMENT & BUDGET 1991 GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION 4,0 EXISTING IULDDIG 1 \ 1 \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ r x r 1\ \ \ PEi \ ; \ NW BLDG \ ■ ■ 1 ■ ■ CONCRETE DOCK \ \ iXr \ 1 \ IQ RUMP �OTN fLMI$ 16 FJ DEEP STAR OF KODIAK AND ALKOI) PLANT LOTS 6 & BLOCK 18 7i.s.E.0,6 '/f17.cr'i, $/2 E /off " ,oa,k Telephone (206) 285 -820. Taiafax (206) 285 -2313 ALL ALASKAN SEAFOODS 130 NICKERSON ST. SUITE 307 SEATTLE, WA 98109 PROPERTY LAYOUT CHECKED BY PDS DATE -27-90 DWG SS -04 REV ASPHALT SURFACE ASPHALT SURFACE \toxtox4w .' 0•A f \ \ \ ATM runts r , \ 1 \ r \ i \ \ \ f - \ \ \ \ \ \ \o\mRS ' CONCRETE DOCK Nk w BLDG 0- • 1 t EXISTING, 'GILDING sod EXISTING METAL BUILDING PARKING CONCRETE HEAVY CONCRETE WOOD DOCK NEW FILL FOR IMPROVED ACCESS CONCRETE DOCK FACE OF DOCK q4/9/ c 12 /%c �, f R� ��P t`RC'•6 % / 10;0 i?ip Kodiak Island Borough Patty Bielawski DGC Southcentral Regional Office 3501 C Street Suite 370 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Re: St. Paul Harbor 25 - Modification SID AK 901220-09A Dear Ms. Bielawski: 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 January 4, 1991 The Kodiak Island Borough has reviewed the Corps permit modification referenced above. The modification entails the additional placement of approximately 7,500 cubic yards of pit run rock and 500 cubic yards of riprap below the high tide line mark to construct additional upland to provide product handling access to the adjoining tideland tract. For your information, this request is also being reviewed by the City of Kodiak as a modification to the development plan submitted to the City at the time the tidelands were purchased from them. For the record, the Kodiak Island Borough recommends that the proposed modification be found consistent with the Kodiak Island Borough Coastal Management Program and the Alaska Coastal Management Program. By copy of this letter, we are also alerting the applicant to the fact that any structural development on this or adjoining property is subject to the land use regulations of the Kodiak Island Borough. Kodiak IslandBorough Patty Bielawski DGC Southcentral Regional Office January 4, 1991 Page Two Thank you for the opportunity comment. If you have any questions about these comments, please feel free to call me. Sincerely, Linda L. Freed, Director Community Development Director cc: W. Dolezal, ADF&G V. Gilbert, ADNR T. Rumfelt, ADEC J. Leeds, COE Lloyd Cannon, All Alaskan Seafoods Tim Blott, AU Alaskan Seafoods KIB Planning and Zoning Commission Herman Buekers, City of Kodiak DIA-0 -19-JdW•U GovernTnental Coord, FAX NU, 9Ufb61b131 v t 2; u tinj otir Tram sevwyrmaiwt 4 SfeiV o1 6c-'NT A& Cr-IP:V.4A rioN e noJPcT INPeRRATToN s . 44 ROJE0T PTTLEt STATE r ;AIUmBPR1R-TITPwrKIG OFFICE 1-A.N9qtae:2('`- sof r DGC CONTACT: //7;--9 (-;" - f APPLICANT CONDUCTING ACTI-A7XTY: DIRECT PEn2RAL ACTION: YES NO REVIEW TYPEg ACTIVITY TYPE! F. U2 gMeil COWni,t COMNOR WIVI<TPMALglanWJ,..0Pf4Cd CIFNALs STREET uer 760 Na100,4 t?E, A LA 5::16032?5,1 PHONt MT) Z741 So' I 4 / -e"-g- CONS,ISTENCY ><ANILCA OCSLA •••Vati...21,4 aRyw-r, -r1v,vg koTyvyPhTpc a=, .1, COMMFIRCIAL/TvPE ANr74 MGMT, PLAN NITNTNG,1 HARDROCK MINING PLACER MININg OFPSHORE MINING-- OTT-. AND GAS rITHPR PUAT,TC UTTLIT/E*/FACILIT.IES PRTVATV RESTDENTTAL TTMAER PROJECT LOCATION NEAREST COASTAL 1VSTRICT! PROJECT INSIDE THE DISTRICT BOUNDARv: NEPA OTHER FISS2RYES PRODUCTION! GENERAL HATCHERY REMOTE PELEASE FISHERIES FARMS: SHEUFISH SEA VEGETABLES FISHERIES ENNANCEAdT FISHERIES PROCESSINC1, YES MO DISTRICT PLAN APPROVED: YES NO pENDYNO REVIE-,q 1,,T-TESTONES! DAY REVTEW SCHEDULE: ,,,;5-DaT.T;?)30-Day 50-Dav REVIEWER REOUEST FOR ADDITIONAL rNFORMTION SY: COME:NTS DUE TO DCC NOTIFICATION TO APDI, TrANT DECISION DEADLINE! OTHER • -; D70-10-0 k75 17):64 Governmental Coord. r.'AX NO, 905616184 (Th pRojRaT P VIOuL RENsaw=. ?PiDE:a STATE ID tz0 '=-417,TO AtvROVALg .1,-*M AGE-NC/AvPRQVAL T7PE/I. NUMB8R:1 4 - .90C --99, .4 P. 03 +.6.31e.14les4 7-nERAL w.b.RoVALS (Lin' AGENCY/p,PPRoVAL TIVE/X.IL NUMZER1 7XTENSTON GRANTED FOR FORMAL IWFORMATION RecluEsT PRO3ECT IN ILO.B. FIELD REVIEM DNA DISPOSAL 8MCRA P,•P e5e...1.': ;V .0 :13,s_Mmer....DEAM PUBLIC SIARING ULD MISCELYANvOUS APPLC; T RtQuEST UAL L.1 r'ORPLEX PROJ.EcT ELEWITION TO D/:MRS: YES EL_VATION TO COMMISsiotaws: CLXK STOPP O NO YES .■=r2111.41..5.1 WAS STOPPED FOR DAYS ArTION AT 0-LOSEOUT: 170S! DATE DISTRICT COMmINTS PEr'vtVEDt IF YES, NO •/. • • a 1. • vfzet c, 0 / CLOCIC RESTARTED ON •• Cro 9 21 uate ACTIVAL NUMBER oP DAV, 1m 11,2'!In NO VW41 VOR CONCLUSIVE CONSIsMicY bETEAMINhTioNR: CON$ISTENT CONSIgTENT WITH qTIPUTATIONS INCONSISTENT WTTIORARN FOR OTHER REVIEWS COMENTs snmITtn) OTHER .41.r.#1.A2M4a piEIpiB.Q •.• - • • • AZ 0C-19-90 el) 14 Clovernmrital Coord, rAx uo. 9O77818134 P. 04 VIEW THE Non; Eat From GCHCPJ5 --JpcV11 Date and time '2/19/90 1547t35 To NRSCCMP --JDCVM1 GREG cu!? rwR DL FM2CAC --JDCVM1 DON MCKAY DPG GCHCPJB --3DCVM1 MEMOS TO FILE Prom: PATTY BTELAWSXT DGC SCR 5,51-6131 81.1biect sT. PAUL HAROR 25 15 DAY LETTER Moa, DGC TD NO- AK90123.0-ViA. THP CE HAS TSSIJED A 15 DAY LETTER NOTICE Or PROPOSED moniPTcATIoN op THE ABOVE PROJECT TUE PROPOSAL TS PLACEMENT OP 7500 cy OF PIT RUN ROCK AND 500 cv OP PIPPP TO CONrSTRUCT ADDITIONAL AP aA FOR PRODUCT FANOL1NG ACCESS TO THE TRACT AJOINING THE OF KoDIA10 PR0cEF4SING vEssEL, PLEASE SEND YOUR COMMENTS VIA PROPS OR PAX TO DGC .D7 NEXT FRIDAY DEC, 28. NOTY, TO DNR T NOP TELL WHETHER THIS PELT, WITHIN AN EXISTING OR Li,T'Ar,:E BOUNDARY. PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF THIS WILL REQUIRE MODIPTCATION TO A DNR AUTHORTZATTON. THANKS. BY '-'0P7 OV THIS PACKET I AH RSQUESTTliG COMilki;NTO PROX THE KOOIAK le;c4LAND BOROUGH AS WILL. THANKS. PP1 A1rnate PPs PP2 FiIe. IOTE PP3 "Kerz,u PF4 Erf PF5 F02Ward Not Reply f Rsend ''S Print. 'F3 7=1P PF10 xt PP11 Prevl•u PF12 Return 1777-1-77 (k47) Lb:55 Governmental Coord, FAX N.) ktb616134 1', Lib 0 0 D7PAFTtvlE.Nis O THE ARMY Aothre ENG:WEE:I OM MASKA as ANCHOnA0g„ ALASKA IMW-08.91.1 Regulatory Branel Permit Processing Section N420551=1 DEC 1 4 (990 Patti Bielawski Office of Management and Budget Diviciion of Governmental corwdinarinn 3601 0 iStreet, PuitiA 370 Andhorage, Alaska 92.1q03-5309 Dear Ms& Bielawskit 01-.7=7Ct 8 FIYIA1 J;4/-0ADW ) This is in resEonse to a request from Mr. Melvin P,„ M‹!--J,:., c 101 r Marine Vay, Kodiak, Alaska 9961S, on behalf of Al1as7Kan Incorporated, dated November 124 1990, concerning a re_dicsi of Department of the Army permit No. 1-220558, St paul Harte,1- Permit issuen to All. Alaskan Seafoods, incorporated, on kovember 26, 1-O cnnsi-euci- 1440 "T." sbaped steel pile rnncrete dedkeci dock additions tb an ekistina docit at f2hA site. One dock is 32'x710 with an 80x12' lPo 1e senond dock is 40`x60' with a 40x24' leg. 13th 1J-15; will 'r'a attadhed in place to the processing Ship "Str (-if Kodiak". The work was , done in, St.. Put Harbor, sec,_tion IV), T. 27 S., P., 19 W„ Sem!trd Meridian, KcIdiak,IA1aska. whe 1.),Irmit was subsequently modified on April 4, 19844 to retain pproximately 3,000 mibic yards (w) of fill material placed adjacent to the 'Star of Kodiak" fish proceE7sor for a work and storage area,. A seoonA permit (2-840479, Si-. Paul nxr 79), was issur-d to All 11'.1_w_tkan Seafoods, Incorporated, on May 2. 1995, to place rod< fill in tidelanas adjacent to the "Star of Kodiak" figh Drocessing plant to provide vessel Stability l'Ipproximately 3,0U0 icy of rotk fill and 500 cy of riprap will be pied in the 22S long bv- 25' wide fill area and constTucted with a 11 side slcve. Morris presently req9ests that auLhorization be granted to include the r_Ala-lemeni- of approximately 7,500 cy of pit run rock and 500 cy of riprap elow the high tide mark to coni,!trueJt additional fat land (upland), to provjide product handling access to the adjoining tract. i . ar e inoluded on the attached fnt dated August 8, 1990. 1 This office has determined that the modification as prosed is not 5i ifiant enou-,jh to warrant a full pu5 c interest review. 'Your emments „ concerNng -me matter Nust L'e received within 35 daysof the date of this letter.; If no comments ate rec.,:ive, it will be'oresumad that your agency ku-19-90 WtD ID56 Governmetqa! Cooed. FAX NO. 90 t)616134 .06 no UbS nf obi to vi.=, cm of -0 tvifaticr as crow-Gad. :g-iotlia you have my clues t ring plea.se call John c, TIT, at ( e nwiit-,r 8O0) 478-2712, of at (907) 15$-27i2 SIncer.ely, / ""7 .-----,4 f " -"1-`7 ,2' 7. j.. imtas _,„/ , Actiflq Odef4,-/orchirri Unit 1---,emit Prc,.. li'Aing za-;<:tion / Enc:7,s-ure 77-11- r1 i;:srA t P4-J. E Govrnme or , 1 MX NO. 90T0616114 PA.( _ - 7 „ . ' ' .h ) , ' - l, , ROI7K PILL 1 \ 8ECTION A 10 20 22_ \ \ . a M HEW 87 MLLt 00 .-Li-1 FEE TIDAL DATA — FICFP;ST TIDE (EST): f4Tri: Mi-11-114 13,9 10.7 0.0 c221) c,.A-,„-, -I 1 _I i I I 1 i 1 I t I I _ - ', ,.. .'„/ 1, t '".t--.-'- .-,_ , M, ,1y ;”' t, "s,p = , .., \ , \ , r \ —:. ,2( \ N \ 0 F \ . 1 O..„p ..../ ..<._ i N. I C\ 1\ \ - \ , r • / • 444 • ,•-•/ \\\ \ /s.) L,4-11'N; 5 7 4 7 1 13. L(YCT1ON 1-4 Osj . • I r! J ,‘„A--,,, .e.,AR-0— ,,,,,..-so.A.V0.• 47.47231.,.. 0..a,t0u......0.,,,.... ....7......1 -, ,...,01 • TC Itrt 1AP t 100 0 500 CAL 77RDS CD „ ('11' . . . . l , -4-- -4 , ' . - ,.1.-3,, 0 — - .:. - - - - k . , _.. .- 1 --- -2 ' .'_ . , 4,- , m .... .. - 71-7 (1o1 .,:- r, .- , .. , „ ,./.. . .. _ . E 41n e \ fe4,r1t-Lr= jfr : \ r O," oiT - - :* f t )" '” 1 1.„, -• , ;„ .. . y .) ..-r... .- - -- . 4 . - ILL , „ e ACIT PROPERTY ( P A S OF Kn'o----T-. KA K KODIAK, ALSA LSKA FRESH SEAK D S KOnIAK, ALASKA ..- PLAN 100 0 SCAL / FEET COMMERCIA)J PLAN T ROa PILL F,001Ag. ISLPND BOROUGH? ALASNA _IN: ST, liK5j3012 81 arkr t r DATE: 8 /P3/ g 0 APPLICATION FY ALL ALASKTIV SLAPC;NDS, INC. 101 MARINE KODIF ALASKA 6J9615 ST. PIIL MARBOR 27, M-820558 441444.4444441.4A.4.4.- ALL ALASKAN SEAFOODS, INC. 130 NICKERSON ST, SUITE 307 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98109 =10 TELEX 321257 • (206) 285.8200 • FAX 1-206-285-2313 November 16, 1990 Honorable Herman Beukers, City Manager City of Kodiak P.O. Box 1397 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Dear Mr. Beukers: I am writing you In reference to the Development plan for the All Alaskan Seafoods, Inc. Tidelands Tract N-42 purchased from the City of Kodiak in September 1988. At that time, the onshore property and tidelands adjoining N-42 to the south, was owned by Alkod, Inc. Since then, All Alaskan Seafoods has acquired clear title to the Alkod property. The original concepts to develop the tidelands should be modified since All Alaskan can now incorporate the Alkod property into the overall project. The original project components are as follows: a. 12,000 yards basefill b. 1,000 yards topfill, c. 1,000 yards armor rock d. 3,400 LF 85' sheet piling e. 4-8 steel piling - deep water f. 7 steel piling - shallow water g. 2 50' cranes To date, All Alaskan has driven the sheet piling and installed the 2 - 50' cranes. An application has been submitted to the Corps of Engineers to obtain a permit for putting in. 7,500 cu yds of rock fill. The attached drawing shows that the need for rock fill is to access the Alkod dock rather than provide the unloading area originally sought prior to the Alkod purchase. Additionally, the drawing depicts a proposed addition to the "Star of Kodiak" processing facility which will potentially double the throughput of the plant. The Alkod property will be initially used in conjunction with the "Star of Kodiak" to supplement production and provide storage. In the near future, the Alkod plant will be renovated as a processing facility. Given that All Alaskan has secured title to the Alkod property and dock, the unloading area alongside the "Star of Kodiak" and therefore, the two rows of piling are no longer needed- to accomplish the objectives as originally outlined in the purchase agreement. Attachment to Ordinance Number 894 Page 1 of 3 The total spent to date is in excess of $1,200,000, including the Alkod property. All Alaskan Seafoods therefore requests, inasmuch as all elements of the purchase agreement have been met, that the amended attachment be accepted as total compliance and fulfillment of the purchase agreement. Sincerely, Cannon President LC/cls Attachment to Ordinance Number 894 Page. 2 of 3 ci- CC:i 0 Cu 0 (.43 co rt 0 0 Q) 0 CD z (D 5 co ASPHALT SURFACE = Ot '6" • " 411S- / EXISTING LINE Cr. • x:X :'mVED ACCESS STAR OF KODIAK AND ALKOD PLANT LOTS 6 & BLOCK 18 • (206) 265-2313 ALL ALASKAN SEAFOODS 130 NICKERSON ST. SERIE 307 SEATTLE. WA 98109 PROPERTY LAYOUT t141.0. ILAll -au 3•27•90 t.tC410 if PD si77 D G SS-04 0 CONTRACT FOR SALE OF TIDELANDS THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into on the day and year hereinafter last written, by and between All Alaskan Sea- , foods, Inc. of P.O. Box 646, Kodiak, Alaska, hereinafter referred to as "Buyer"; and the City of Kodiak, Alaska, a municipal corpor- ation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Alaska, hereinafter referred to as "the City"; WITNESSETH: For and in consideration of the mutual covenants, stipu- lations and conditions herein contained the parties agree as follows: 1. Sale. The City agrees to sell and convey and the Buyer agrees to purchase the following described real property: City of Kodiak Tideland Tract N-42, according to Plat No. 88-14 in the Kodiak Recording District, Third Judicial District, State of Alaska. 2. Purchase Price. The Buyer agrees to pay for the above-described real property the sum of ONE HUNDRED SIXTEEN THOU- SAND AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($116,000.00) as follows: (a) $11,600.00 which has heretofore been paid, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged and confessed. (b) $104,400.00 upon execution of this contract. 3. Construction of Improvements. Buyer has submitted an application and development plan to City setting forth plans for the construction on the aforesaid property of certain fill and steel pilings. Buyer shall commence and complete construc- tion within sixty (60) months after execution of this contract as City/All Alaskan Seafoods, Inc. Contract for Sale of Tidelands Page 1 of 6 set forth the development plan suomitted by Buyer in accord- ance with KCC 18.12.030 and subsequently revised pursuant to letters dated July 7, 1988 and September 8, 1988 from Buyer to the City. 4. Escrow. Upon signing, this agreement, an executed quitclaim deed from the City to the Buyer and an executed quitclaim deed from the Buyer to the City shall be placed in escrow with •a financial institution in the City of Kodiak. The escrow shall provide for the release to the Buyer of the documents in escrow upon receipt of a certificate of compliance executed by City attesting to the fact that Buyer has completed the aforesaid improvements according to the (revised) development plan and for the release of said documents to the City upon receipt of a notice of default executed by the City stating that the development plan was not completed within six (6) months after the completion date set forth in the (revised) development plan or that improvements were not constructed in substantial compliance with that plan. 5. Incorporation of Ordinances. The provisions of. Chapter 18.12 of the Kodiak City Code, to the extent they are applicable to sales of tidelands, are hereby incorporated by! :reference and made a part of this agreement. 6. Possession of Premises. Buyer shall be entitled to •the possession of the premises immediately and may retain posses- 1.sion for so long as it is not in default under the terms of this :agreement. 7. Applicable Laws. The construction of any improve- City/A11 Alaskan -Seafoods, Inc. Contract for Sale of Tidelands Page 2 of 6 ments on the premises shall conform to all state, federal, city and borough regulations and building codes. 8. Liens. Until such time as the improvements speci- fied in the (revised) development plan submitted by Buyer have been completed and the quitclaim deed from City to Buyer has been released from escrow and duly recorded, Buyer shall keep the pre- mises free from mechanics and all other liens and shall secure the release of any liens so filed or post a bond with the City sufficient to secure their payment. Buyer shall save the City harmless from any liens filed and shall reimburse the City for all costs and attorneys' fees incurred to defend against or obtain the release of such liens. 9. Taxes and Assessments. Buyer shall promptly pay all taxes hereinafter levied against the premises as well as all assessments or other charges which are lawfully imposed upon the premises, promptly before the same or any part thereof becomes past due. 10. Time of the Essence. Time is of the essence with regard to each and every provision of this agreement. 11. Default. (a) If Buyer defaults in its obligation to construct improvements in accordance with the (revised) development plan and application filed with the City and within sixty (60) months of the date of this agreement, the City may . terminate this contract by written notice to the escrow agent,,._ with a copy of the same to the Buyer, advising of the default and demanding surrender of the documents held in escrow. City may thereupon record the quitclaim deed executed by Buyer, re- enter City /All Alaskan Seafoods, Inc. Contract for Sale of Tidelands Page 3 of 6. the premises, and retain the purchase price, it being acknow- ledged and agreed that, until such time as the. improvements in the development plan have been constructed on the premises, Buyer's title to the premises shall be defeasible and subject to a power of termination. (b) If Buyer defaults in the performance of any obliga- tion imposed by this contract other than the obligation to construct improvements in accordance with the development plan filed with the City, then the City may bring an action at law to recover any damages incurred as a result of the default which action may be coupled with an action for judicial foreclosure of this contract and sale of Buyer's entire interest in the prem- ises, including any improvements constructed thereon. The City, in case of default, shall have the right immediately, or any anytime after default, to enter upon the premises without any process of law and take immediate possession thereof, together with all improvements and appurtenances thereon. 12. Replatting of Property. The parties acknowledge that Tideland Tract N-42 is smaller than the minimum lot size 'mandated by the Kodiak Island Borough Code for similarly-zoned. property. According, Buyer immediately shall initiate appro- priate procedures to vacate and replat Tideland Tract N-42 together with other contiguous property owned by Buyer or other- , wise obtain relief from the applicable Borough Code provisions. !. 13. Nonwaiver. The failure by the City to insist upon. strict performance of any term, condition or covenant of this I ! - '.City/All Alaskan Seafoods, Inc. !:Contract for Sale of Tidelands ;',Page 4 of 6 i contract or to exercise any right or remedy available on a breach thereof shall not constitute a waiver of any such breach of any applicable term, condition or covenant of this agreement. Waiver of performance, of any breach thereof, shall be City. A waiver of any term, condition continue in full term, condition or covenant or of any only by written instrument executed by default shall not affect or alter any or covenant of this agreement and they shall.._ force and effect with respect to any other or subsequent default. 14. Assignment. without the prior written Buyer shall not assign this contract . consent of the City and any assignment made without the express written approval of the City shall be void. 15. Notices. Notices required or authorized by the Contract shall be served upon the parties at the following addresses and at such other address as either party may provide in writing to the other. Buyer All Alaskan Seafoods, Inc. P.O. Box 646 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 16. Attorney's Fees City City of Kodiak P.O. Box 1397 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 and Costs. If either party com- mences an action to secure any rights arising out of this con- tract or to enforce any of the provisions hereof, the prevailing -• party shall be entitled to an award of its costs, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred in said action. City of Kodiak y: Gordon Gould City Manager °City /A11 Alaskan Seafoods, Inc. Contract for Sale of Tidelands :Page 5 of 6 All Alaskan Seafoods, Inc. By: STATE OF AL4=izia : ss.: THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT ) THIS IS TO CERTIFY that on the EZKYf day of 1988, before me, the undersigned Notary Public in and for the State of Alaska, duly sworn' and commissioned as such, personally appeared GORDON J. GOULD, to me known to be the City Manager of the City of Kodiak, a municipal corporation of the State of Alaska, and known to me to be the individual who executed the within instru- ment on behalf of the City of Kodiak, and acknowledged to me that the same was signed as a free act and deed on behalf of said municipal corporation for the uses and purposes therein stated and pursuant to authority derived from the Charter or ordinances of the City of Kodiak or action of the City Council. WITNESS my hand and notarial seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public in and for Alaska My Commission Expires: 7.2:5•Ic1qo STATE OF WASHINGTON : ss.: KING COUNTY THIS IS TO CERTIFY that on they day of C",c1-76-1c,, , 1988 before me, the undersigned Notary Public in and for the State of Alaska, duly sworn and commissioned as such, personally appeared LLOYD W. CANNON, to me known to be the President of All Alaskan, Fisheries. Inc., a corporation, and known to me to be the indivi- dual who executed the within instrument on behalf of said corpora- tion herein named, and acknowledged to me that the same was signed as a free act and deed of the said corporation for the uses and purposes therein stated and pursuant to its Bylaws or a resolution of its Board of Directors. WITNESS my hand and notarial seal the day and year first; above written. 1,11•-■"-■ Notary Public in a d for Washington Residing at City/A11 Alaskan Seafoods, Inc. Contract for Sale of Tidelands Page 6 of 6 h7 t3.. ..., 14 a1 September 8, 1988 Marcella Daike, CMC /AAE City Clerk City of Kodiak Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Dear Marcella; +, 4*6 451.+ HLL HLN3t.1-411 v•, ALL ALASKAN SEAFOODS, INC. 130 NICKERSON ST, SUITE 307 • SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98109 TELEX321257 • (208)28548200 • FA)( 1-208-285-2313 I am writing in response to your letter dated August 3, 1988, to Oscar . Dyson, in which you transmit the City Council's request for additional details to the revised development plan for Tideland Tract N -42. 1. The proposed use of Tideland Tract N -2 is as a component of a multi- faceted project - 1) To provide a base primarily to facilitate the expans- ion of bottomfish operations including a staging and storage area for refrigerated vans. 2) To accomodate the unloading of bottomfish trawlers; 3) For loading and unloading bulk cargo freighters. 4) For temporary moorage of All Alaskan factory ships. 5) Provide support facilities and an unloading areas for shallow draft salmon fishing vessels. 2. The total cubic yards of fill will be 12,000 base, 1,000 topfill and 1,000 armor rock. The 85' breakwater will consist of interlocking sheet piling driven to bedrock and secured to the "Star of Kodiak" with cross tie beams. A line of approximately seven (7) piling will be driven out - from, and parallel -to, the breakwater for use by shallow draft vessels while repairing gear and unloading salmon. The second line of four (4) to eight (8) piling will be driven from the outside end of the new dock on a line drawn along the dock face and extending 180' from the dock. The piling and the recently completed dock, (which measures 40' x 110'), will replace the 180' x 40' dock originally planned to abut the All Kod dock. vessels with bottomfish and frozen cargo will be unloaded at the south end of the dock while securing to the piling. 3. Initial stages of the project will begin immediately once Corp of Engineer and City permits can be secured. Completion time will be with- in the allocated sixty -month period. Protect Component a) 12,000 Yards base fill b) 1,000 Yards top fill c) 1,000 Yards Armor Rock d) 3,400LF 85' Sheet Piling e) 4 -8 Steel piling -Deep water f) 7 Steel piling - shallow water g) 2 -50' Cranes for unloading bottomfish and salmon 06/01/89. 1 Y• .: i p L 4 7 t 3 l Marcella Dalke, CMC /AAE City Clerk City of Kodiak September 8, 1988 Page 2 of 2 4. The total estimated investment planned during the development period will be approximately: Project Component Cost Fill including Armor Rock $.180,000 Piling 135,000 Sheet Piling 135,000 Crane 150,000 Total $ 600,000 5. The total annual estimated payroll for the first 12 month after complet- ion of the project will necessarily depend upon a number of factors, most of which are related to the magnitude and availability of bottomfish stocks, market conditions, foreign currency exchange, etc. for example, pollock roe operations might well increase the need for process workers by 30 to 50 personnel during February and March. Our ability to process bottomfish year- around could easily generate additional payroll in excess of two million dollars annually. Given the Mandates of the Magnusen Act, domestic processing operations and Coastal Communities are to realize maximum benefits as Joint Ventures are phased out. 6. The expected taxable valuation will be a minimum of $600,000 depending upon growth opportunities in keeping with the previously - mentioned project goals. 7. The additional expansion plans have, in general, been included within the project proposal. Specific plans can be described in detail once total functionality and flexibility of the initial project stages have been evaluated. 8. Included is an accurate plan, drawn to scale, depicting the proposed improvements to Tideland Tract N -42 and the contingent properties. Sincerely, 1LL ALASKAN SEAFOODS, INC. ?resident. JC: sv ~n, • '' ~ ' ~ July 7, 1988 all ALASKAN SEAFOODS, INC. 101 MARINE WAY KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 (907) 486-3266 Honorable Gordon J. Gould City Manager City of Kodiak P. 0. Box 1397 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 i.9 ;. ,..-.1 RECEIVED ; it- CRY CLERK'S OFFICE ?,.) CITY OF KODIAK Reference: Revised Development Plan with Purchase of Tidelands by All Alaskan Seafoods, Inc. from City of Kodiak Dear Mr. Gould: We would appreciate your, and the City Council's consideration on a revised development plan with regards to the purchase of the tidelands in front of the All Alaskan, owned by the City of Kodiak. We have attached a sketch showing the project as revised; the revision being caused by our realization of the shallow depth of the water where we intended to place the future dock development. Our drag fleet and big crabbers would not be able to use the dock, there being only seven or eight feet on a minus tide. In the revised plan, we will extend our existing fill to abut the Alkod dock, approximately 50 feet from the end of Alkod's dock. The fill would be compacted, and provide a base for future develop- ment. Secondly, we will provide for a breakwater along the current fill line extending 85 feet from the inside end of our newly con- stucted dock. A line of piling will be driven out and parallel to the breakwater and tied into the breakwater. This area will be used for unloading shallow draft vessels and for gear repair and loading. A second line of piling will be driven from the outside end of the new dock on a line drawn along the dock face and extend- ing 180 feet from the dock; this will provide temporary mooring for larger deep. draft vessels such as the New All Alaskan. The revised proposal will result in the same project cost. It will allow All Alaskan Seafoods, Inc. to utilize the deep water for vessel mooring. The shallow area will be covered with fill to support future expansion of maybe a cold storage. We do not intend to offer Alkod formal or permanent concessions or restrictive covenants. Sincerely yours, ALL ALASKAN SEAFOODS, INC. 4reZe4 Oscar Dy on Vice President OD:njm Enclosures rrE LaSM OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR 1 OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET 1 DIVISION OF GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION SOUTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE 431 NORTH FRANKLIN - P.O. BOX AW, SUITE 101 JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811 -0165 PHONE: (907) 465 -3562 P,11_ Alaskan Seafoods ATTN: Melvin Morris 101 Marine Way Kodiak, AK 99615 Dear Mr. Morris: WALTER /. NICKEL, GOVERNOR CENTRAL OFFICE P.O. BOX AW JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811 -0165 PHONE: (907) 465 -3562 SOUTHCENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE NORTHERN REGIONAL OFFICE 3601 'C' STREET SUITE 370 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503 -5930 PHONE: (907) 561 -6131 January 3, 1991 SUBJECT: ST. PAUL HARBOR 25. - -MODIFICATION STATE I.D. NO. AK901220 -0 9A 675 SEVENTH AVENUE STATION H FAIRBANKS, ALASKA 99701 -4596 PHONE: (907) 451 -2818 The Division of Governmental Coordination (DGC) is currently coordinating the state's review of the above referenced project modification for consistency with the Alaska Coastal Management Program (ACMP). During the course of this review the Department of Fish and Game (DFG) identified the need for additional infor- mation. The DFG has requested a specific drawing /diagram of the proposed additional fill. A copy of their request is enclosed. Please provide the requested drawing to Mr. John Leeds at the Corps of Engineers and to myself at DGC. Upon receipt it will be circulated to reviewers for their information and comment. Per 6 AAC 50 so I am extending the review until the requested information is received. Thank you for your cooperation with the ACMP. cc: Greg Curney, DNR Tim Rumfelt, DEC Wayne Dolezal, DFG Linda Freed, KIB John Leeds, COE mot /44 /mb 01 -A35LH Sincerely, �G c• Patty Bielawski Review Coordinator WCfl%ID JAM 7 1991 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEM DEPT AK DEPT OF FISH &GAME HABITAT ANC P.02 t- . DEPARTMENT OF FISII AND GAME ; December 20, 1990- Mr. John C. Leeds, 1/I U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Branch (1145b) P.O. Box 898 Anchorage, Alaska 9950G -0898 Dear Mr. Leeds: WALTER J. HICKEL, GOVERNOR 333 RASPBERRY ROAD ANCHORAGE. ALASKA 99518.1599 PHONE 1907134 541 Re: St. Paul Harbor 25, COE Permit No. N- 820558 The Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF &G) has begun review of the referenced project, however, based on the information provided we are not able to determine where or in what configutration the fill is to located. Please provide more specific data, preferably dimensional drawing /diagrams, that show the location of the fill and the shape of its footprint below the high tide line. Also provide information that details the angle of the slope of the riprap face and the size of material that will be used for riprap. We appreciate your assistance in this matter and will resume our review upon receipt of the requested information. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 267- 2284. Sincerely, C. Wayne Dolezal Habitat Biologist Habitat Division Alaska Department of Fish and Game cc: M. North, USFWS G. Currey, ADNR /DLWM T. Rumfelt, ADEC B. Smith, NMFS P. North, EPA P. Bielawski, OMB /DGC BRIM JAN 7 1991 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • tSEPT ",.. APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT AND CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANY - CITY OF KODIAK - KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH - BUILDING DEPARTMENT Telephone: 486 -3224 700 Mill Bay Road FORMATION WITHIN BOLD LINES. PLEASE PRINT. USE A BALLPOINT PEN AND PRESS FIRMLY.) (OFFICE USE ONLY) BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER: DATE OF APPLICATION: STREET ADDRESS: CLASS AND SCOPE OF WORK: SPECIFICATIONS: LOT : BLOCK : NEW DEMOLITION FOUNDATION FOOTINGS STEM WALL PIERS ZONING COMPLIANCE DATE ISSUED: ALTERATION REPAIR TYPE SUBDIVISION / SURVEY: ADDITION MOVE DIMENSIONS VALUATION BASIS: BUILDING PERMIT FEE: DEPTH IN GRND N E R NAME: USE OF BUILDING AUTHORIZED BY THIS PERMIT: I.-)P>r). i %. AN J-1- /jrrA, ∎T, Y\ REINFORCEMENT VALE UATION: PLAN CHECK FEE: BOLT SPACING MAILING ADDRESS: CRAWL SPACE HEIGHT INCHES OCCUPANCY GROUP: TOTAL FEE: A B E H I M R DIV. 1 2 3 4 5 6 CRAWL SPACE VENT SQ. FEET RECEIPT NO.: CITY & SIZE HEIGHT STRUCTURAL SPECIES & GRADE SIZE SPACING SPAN EACH OF THE FOLLOWING STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION REQUIRES INSPECTION BE REQUESTED & COMPLETED PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH ANY FURTHER WORK: FOR INSPECTION CALL 486-3224 NO. OF ROOMS STORIES TELEPHONE NO. OF FAMILIES GIRDERS TYPE OF BUSINESS GIRDERS A R C H / E N G NAME: NO. OF BLDGS NOW ON LOT JOISTS 1ST FLOOR USE OF EXISTING BLDGS JOISTS 1ST FLOOR TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION SIZE OF LOT JOISTS 2ND FLOOR I II III IV V N 1 -HR FR H.T. WATER: PUBLIC PRIVATE JOISTS 2ND FLOOR CITY & STATE: SEWER: PUBLIC PRIVATE CEILING JOISTS EXCAVATION INSULATION TYPE & THICKNESS: EXTERIOR WALLS TELEPHONE : FOUNDATION BEARING WALLS UNDERGROUND UTILITIES INTERIOR WALLS DRIVEWAY PERMIT: FOUNDATION /SETBACKS SUBMITTED FRAMING STATE LICENSE : WALLS ROOF RAFTERS ROOF / CEILING TRUSSES APPROVED ROUGH ELECTRICAL C T R A C T 0 R NAME: SHEATHING TYPE & SIZE: FURNACE TYPE: ROUGH PLUMBING ADEC APPLICATION: FINAL FLOOR SUBMITTED DATE C.O. ISSUED: MAILING ADDRESS: WOOD HEATER YES NO TYPE FINAL APPROVAL WALLS ALASKA FIREMARSHALL REVIEW: SUBMITTED: APPROVED: CITY & STATE: ROOF I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION, THAT IT IS CORRECT AND THAT I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH ALL ORDINANCES AND LAWS REGULATING BUILDING CONSTRUCTION APPLICANT: �e1 l X11// r r i- �/4i /� TELEPHONE : FINISH MATERIAL: ROOF APPROVED- BUILDING OFFICAL: /_ .1 STATE LICENSE EXTERIOR SIDING INTERIOR WALLS NOTES: KODIAK !BLAND BOROUGH Community Development ZONING COMPLIANCE PERMIT Permit #: 0^ CZ- _off 710 Mip Bay Road (Room 204). Kodak Alaska 99615-6340 -Phone: (907) 4865736, extension 255 or 254 1. Property Owner /Applicant: 4(1 4.56A r�cf t4umber and .5e-- Marling Address- ` 1 1 / " t� Phone: SIMof parting awes requited (crei,,;ae„itca„r,ofp 6 requited -Yes: Kr ) L - 1 ;_ - _. _ , I 2 Legal Description: Ci" (a.._,, j, PJ — -2-1-A-- _ Aiw Oft-street loading �: -��r�� Street Address: l Q 1 1. V\Inl" Z1",.., w Tau code x: R.1 ( Oat) O 31 Ptat relayed requirements (e -g-, plat nodes, easements, svbdrvaron condioais, etc): f (.) la-- 3. Description of Existing Property/ct,r f4zonmg: d .x sdvJQ Minimum Required Lot Areal �VJ� � Width: �S �l'"' 1/; Other requirements (e.g, zero lot fine, addiborai setbacks, protectors Into yams, screening, etc.): ti e� Actual Lot Area- L 4 J p SS 4_ width: U ,A . 6fininsrm Required Setbacks: Sides: ! Iv (n� � Front: Iv Imo- Rear: 0 ►d� Coastal Management Program Applicable Polices I�edc appropriate category) - Resaoental: Business: IYmrtum Building Height: h / i t!M„ . Pay c J Div f----64-4-- VC�', hdusmal: X' ' Other (tat): �� Use and size of existing structures on the bt Se �,eJ - c-c.r 1 U ,PX-••Q ; is the proposed action went with the KB Coastal Management Program? - Yes: No: U (k-- If the proposed action conftiets with the Coastal Management Program °oboes, attach a sheet that notes the ooircyr les), desrnaes the wnfiict(s), ana s°edres c ndruors to mmgae the mnfict(s)- Auacomeri - Yes: No 4. Des ription of proposed action (area, see Pan). 1 .� •t /, . .� _ ;_ . tom. __ cerst (i .- 0Mecs<. -e / _ S 5. Applicant • e, cation: I hereoy certdy that I will comply with the provisions of the Kodiak Island Borough Code and that I have the authatty to certify rthis as the progeny owner, or as a representative of the property owner. I agree to have . , comer in place in the field for verification of setbacks. Af By %/' • Irk , Date: {P - /O ' l v title: 4 S7 /1/✓Z•U E7( Supporting docun its , . . (. :. ): Site man: Al As-built survey- Other (list): 6. Community Development staff for zoning br: . ' _ _ _ .. Date: / f o tae: .,, ����y,,,, — if /4c 7. Fire Chief ply of Kodiak, tins District tst (Barside), women. eery Fire Dismal approval for uFC t>r Der: • 8. Driveway Permit (Stag., pty el Kodiak, Borough) issued by: Date: 9. Septic system PLAN appro,r.d br: Date: Distribution: File /Build Official /Ac9iimnt THIS FORM DOES NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION WHEN A BUILDING PERMIT IS REQUIRED December 1989 Kodiak Island Bo ough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 Patty Bielawski, Project Coordinator Division of Governmental Coordination Southcentral Regional Office 2600 Denali Street, Suite 700 Anchorage, Alaska 99503-2798 October 9, 1989 Re: NPDES AK-000036-1 SID AK 891002-01A - All Alaska Seafoods (Alkod Facility) Dear Ms. Bielawski: The Kodiak Island Borough has reviewed the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit referenced above. We have no objection to the issuance of the permit as long as State water quality standards are met. The Kodiak Island Borough recommends that this project be found consistent with the Kodiak Island Borough Coastal Management Program and the Alaska Coastal Management Program. If you have any questions about these comments, please call me. Sincerely, Linda Freed, Director Community Development Department cc: V: Clark, DNR W. Dolezal, ADF&G H. Geren, EPA B. Lamoreaux, DEC 370E U •acs OW TUN MIV$R1 Ot DIVISION OF GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET PROJECT TITLE: 07.01S i7( Ai/ffStlr4�c1 STEVE COWPLR, GOVERNOR SOUTHCENTRAL REGIONAL ORME 2800 DENAU STREET SUITE 700 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 995034796 PHONE: M071271-1581 STATE I .. NUMBER /REVIEWING OFFICE: AK891phZ, -Q1 Pk • DGC CONTACT: / L'/,)S' lZ t • APPLICANT CONDUCTING ACTIVITY:. ,1g 47/1 5 DIRECT FEDERAL ACTION: YES NO REVIEW TYPE: CONSISTENCY XANILCA ACTIVITY TYPE: ARMED FORCES ACTIVITIES_ COMMERCIAL /TYPE LAND MGMT. PLAN MINING: HARDROCK MINING PLACER MINING OFFSHORE MINING OIL AND GAS OTHER PUBLIC UTILITIES /FACILITIES PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL TIMBER ..Siooc7C OCSLA NEPA OTHER -,L-./ C_ FISHERIES PRODUCTION: GENERAL r Q HATCHERY � �,yU I REMOTE RELEASE 4v17>: . FISHERIES FARMS: ' 0 FINFISH 64, SHELLFISH SEA VEGETABLES FISHERIES ENHANCEMENT FISHERIES PROCESSING )( PROJECT LOCATION: NEAREST COASTAL DISTRICT: . fr- 01;,¢/ _Z /A¢YI c PROJECT INSIDE THE DISTRICT BOUNDARY: -YES)( NO DISTRICT PLAN APPROVED: YES ) NO PENDING REVIEW MILESTONES: DAY 1 !_N o',4 1 f C 7 y REVIEW SCHEDULE: 15 -Day 30 -Day 50 -Day )( OTHER REVIEWER REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BY: Q('-\t9 CY11! ,`]WA / COMMENTS DUE TO DGC BY: ti,.jt'tCtr r (9 ) 1 NOTIFICATION TO APPLICANT BY : 00\ic 1' ,- 14-1) OM DECISION DEADLINE: \'\ \J(°1Y\L ( Z0J IQ FS PROJECT. PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED UNDER STATE ID NO" STATE APPROVALS (LIST AGENCY /APPROVAL TYPE /I.D, NUMBER): G Yo/ Cgrf FEDERAL APPROVALS (LIST AGENCY /APPROVAL TYPE /I.D. NUMBER): ' CA /c— oa p© 31( EXTENSION GRANTED FOR: FORMAL INFORMATION REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING HELD DNR DISPOSAL SMCRA MISCELLANEOUS APPLICANT REQUEST UNUSUALLY COMPLEX PROJECT ELEVATION TO DIRECTORS: YES NO IF YES, BY: PROJECT IN'U.O.B. FIELD REVIEW ELEVATION TO COMMISSIONERS: •YES CLOCK STOPPED ON WAS STOPPED FOR DAYS ACTION AT CLOSEOUT: CLOSE -OUT DATE NO IF YES, BY: CLOCK RESTARTED ON ACTUAL NUMBER OF DAYS IN REVIEW DISTRICT COMMENTS RECEIVED: YES NO FOR CONCLUSIVE CONSISTENCY DETERMINATIONS: CONSISTENT CONSISTENT WITH STIPULATIONS INCONSISTENT WITHDRAWN FOR OTHER REVIEWS: COMMENTS SUBMITTED OTHER pis /prinfo DISTRIBUTION LIST September 25, 1989 [613] Ms. Judith Bittner, Department of Natural Resources Division of Parka, Anchorage [1350] Mr. Tom Brooks, Manager, Civil Engineering Alaska Railroad Corporation, Anchorage [3] Mr. Bob Flint, Department of Environmental Conservation, Anchorage [867] Ms. Linda Freed, Kodiak [1220] Ms. Veronica Gilbert, Department of Natural Resources, Anchorage [268] Mr. Uwe L. Grose, Kodiak [1394] Ms. Sara Hunt, Division of Governmental Coordination, Juneau [1072] Mr. Neil Johansen, Department of Natural Resources Division of Parks, Anchorage [303] Mr. Michael O'Brien, Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, Anchorage [287] Mr. Gordon Puller, Kodiak Area Native Association, Kodiak [859] The Honorable Jerome M. Selby, Kodiak [371] Mr. Lance Traaky, Department of Fish and Game, Anchorage SIM CF Ion OFFICE OF TIRE GOVERNOR OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET DIWSION..OF GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION SOUTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE 431 NORTH FRANKLIN POUCH AW, SUITE 101 JUNEAU. ALASKA 9981.1 -0165 PHONE: (907) 465.3582 SOUTHCENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE 2600 OENAU STREET SUITE 700 ANCHORAGE. ALASKA 99503.2798 PHONE: (907) 274 -1581 8111 SHEFFIELD, GOVERNOR CENTRAL OFFICE POUCH AW JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811 -0165 PHONE: (907) 465-3562; - - NORTHERN REGIONAL OFFICE. . 675 SEVENTH AVENUE STATION H • FAIRBANKS, ALASKA 99701 -4598 PHONE: (907) 456 -3084- Certification of Consistency with the Alaska Coastal Management Program Section•307(c)(3)(A) of the Coastal Zone Management Act of- 1972 as amended by 16 USC 1456(c).(3) requires that appli- cants for federal permits to conduct activities affecting land or water uses in Alaska'.s* coastal area must provide certification. that the activities will comply with the standaFds of the Alaska Coastal Management Program. The proposed activity described in your federal permit application may require certification. By filling out the attached coastal. project questionnaire you, together with the State's. resource agencies, will not only determine the- necessity-,for this certification, but you will also find out if other State approvals are needed before-, your` proposed activity can proceed.. This will also assist you in filling out your federal permit application. sUpom receipt .of the signed, dated certification., a public notice can be issued and review of your project can begin. For additional information on the Alaska Coastal Manage- ment Program and project review procedures, contact one of the offices indicated on this-letterhead. Please submit a signed certification and applicable State permit applications to the appropriate State agency indicated in the questionnaire. You must also submit a signed certification to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers along with your U.S.. Army Corps permit application.• CERTIFICATION STATEMENT .1 certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the proposed activity described in the Corps of Engineers 'permit application complies with the approved Alaska Coastal Management Program, and will be conducted in a manner consistent with such program. Attached is a copy of a completed coastal project questionnaire. Sign4ture of Applicant* `" Date' fc /permit /coe .Attachment 01 -A35LH * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * . * * * PLEASE ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS.. PLEASE INCLUDE MAPS OR PLAN DRAWINGS WITH YOUR PACKET. AN INCOMPLETE QUESTIONNAI MAY :BE RETURNED AND WILL DELAY THE REVIEW OF YOUR PROJECT. PA_. Applicant: i Address: /01 1'%d f v e. Lt/ 1 c.Cov0", --cet 13(a-60-- Contact Person: d_is 41"_.r_ Address: kaJ ' ,-Ak 79Go' k Phone (day): (-70 '/Bt - 3 Z( (P Phone (day): (io7) 3863 Brief description of project or activity, - including associated facilities • Se a d o (i g d S.C. r, 1.--; • ��. P,n.oi,u 7/'is Ls hc4- d .rne " r eef, Starting date for project Ending date for project . Location of Project (include nearest community or identifiable land or water body): Meridian .Township Range Section Aliquot Parts USGS Map Is the project on: private land X state land federal land municipal land 47 ownership not known Identify which region of the State the project is in (see attached map): northern • southcentral- )( southeast PART 8 • e - F 1. Do you currently have any State or federal approvals / permits for this project? If yes, please list below, Permit /Approval Type •c4a7le &o ,4 hJ l Permit /Approval # hod /roc.4s ,•,;1 N. to, D.E -S, 4k 006036- I. Expiration Date Yes 2.. Will you be placing .structures, or placing fills in any of the .following:. tidal waters, streams, lakes, wetlands *? *- If you are. uncertain whether your proposed project area is in a wetland, contact the Corps of Engineers, Regulatory Branch at (907) 753-2720 for a wetlands determination. If' you are outside the Anchorage area call toll free 1 -800- 478 - 2712._ If yes, have you applied for or do you intend to apply for a U.S Army Corps of Engineers (COE) permit? (The COE has jurisdiction over activities described above.) Please indicate in Question No. 3 below* wheryotipp];sect to: the COE or when you intend to apply. 3.. Have you applied€or da you intend to apply for other permits from any federal agency? If yes. list below. Date you submitted or Agency_ Permit /Approval Type plan to submit application 7R4 ‘0.11‘.!: uJA, * * * * * .* * * * * *. * * * *•* * -, * * * PART C DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 1.. Is the proposed project on State - owned land or will you need to cross State lands for access? (Note: In addition to State owned uplands, the State has jurisdiction over most.lands below the ordinary high water line of streams, rivers, lakes, and line of mean high tide of the tidelands seaward for three miles.) 2. Is any portion of your project placed below the ordinary high water line of a stream, river, lake or other water body? 3. Will you be dredging? If yes, location of dredging: , Meridian (M) Township (T) Range (R) Section (Sec) Location of disposal site for dred9ed material : M T R Sec 4. Will you be fill ins with rock, sand or gravell If yes, amount? Location of-source: M Location of area to be filled: T R Sec. T R Sec 5. Do you plan to use any of the following state -owned resources? Timber If yes, amount? Location of source: M T R Sec .3- Other Materials - If yes, what mateihne. peat, •u •1ng stone, st t, ove •u Location of.sourcer I4 T R Sec Are you planning to: use any water? If yes, amount? Source? 0:41. «1 /d .c : p k. 7. Will you be building or altering a dam? 8. Do you plan to drill a geothermal well? 9. Will you be exploring for or extracting coal? 10. Will you be exploringfor or extracting minerals orf state -owned land? 11. Will you be exploring for or extracting oil and gas on state -owned land? 12. Will'you be harvesting timber from 10 or more acres? 13. Will you be investigating or removing historic or archeological resources on State -owned lands? 14. Will the project be located in a unit of the State Pa System (including the Kenai River Special Management Area, State Recreation Areas, State Historic Sites, State Preserves, etc.)? IF YOU CORRECTLY ANSWERED NO TO ALL THESE QUESTIONS, YOU DO NOT NEED APPROVAL FROM THE ALASKA DEPARTMENT-UF NATURAL RESOURCES (DNR). GO TO PART D. IF YOU ANSWERED YES TO ANY OF THESE. QUESTIONS, CONTACT DNR TO IDENTIFY AND MAIN ANY NECESSARY APPLICATION FORMS. Yes If. you have already contacted ONR, are you now sub:mi.tting applica ;'cr' for permits or-approvals? If yes, list ONR approvals for which you a-: now applying:. Have you paid the filing fees required for the DNR permits? If you are not applying for permits, indicate the reason below: a. (DNR contact) told me on (date) that no DNR approvals or permits were required for this project. Other. * * * * * * * * * * * No PART D DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME 1. Will you be working -in a. stream, river, or lake (this includes running water or on ice,__rtthta thViEfive floodplain, on islands, the face . of the banks, or the_stream tideflats down to mean low tide)? Name of stream or river Name of lake If no, go to question number 3. 2: If yes, will you be doing any of the followings a) Building of a dam, river training structure or instream impoundment? b) Using the water? c) Diverting or altering the natural channel stream? d) Blocking or damming the stream (temporarily or permanently)? e) Changing the flow of the water or changing the bed? f) Pumping water out of the stream or lake? g) Introducing silt, gravel, rock, petroleum products, debris, chemicals, or wastes of any type into the water? - h), Using the stream as a road (even when frozen), or crossing the stream with tracked or wheeled vehicles, log- dragging or excavation equipment (backhoes, bulldozers, etc.)? i) Altering or stabilizing the banks? j) Mining or digging in the beds or banks? k) Using explosives? 1) Building . a bridge (including an ice bridge)? m) Installing a culvert or other drainage structure? n) Constructing a weir? 3. Is your project located in a State Game Refuge, Critical Habitat Area, or State Game Sanctuary? . 4. Does your project include the construction and operation of a salmon hatchery? 5. Does your project affect or is it related to a previously permitted salmon hatchery? IF YOU CORRECTLY ANSWERED NO TO ALL THESE QUESTIONS, YOU DO NOT NEED A PERMIT FROM THE ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME (DFG). GO TO PART E. IF YOU ANSWERED YES TO QUESTIONS 1 -3, CONTACT THE REGIONAL HABITAT DIVISION OFFICE T IDENTIFY AND OBTAIN ANY NECESSARY APPLICATION FORMS. -5- Yes No IF YOU ANSWERED YES TO QUESTIONS 4 -5, CONTACT THE PRIVATE NONPROFIT • HATCHERY OFFICE AT F:R.E.D, DIVISION HEADQUARTERS TO OBTAIN INFORMATION AND ANY-NECESSARY APPLICATION FORMS. Yes If you have already contacted DFG, are you now submitting an application for permit(s)?:. If yet.--list DFG approvals for which you are now applying: If you are not applying for permits, indicate the reason below: . a. (DFG contact) told me on (date) that no DFG approvals or permits were required for t is project. b. Other. * * * * * * * * * *.* * * *. * * * * * * *.* * *•* * * * * * PART E DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION 1. Will a discharge of wastewater from industrial or commercial operations occur? 2. Will your project generate air emissions from the following: a) Diesel generators totaling more than 10,000 hp? b) Other fossil fuel -fired electric generator, furnace, or-boiler- totaling greater than 10,000 hp, or 9,000kw, or 100,000,000 btu /hr? c) Asphalt plant? d) Incinerator burning more than 1000 lbs. per hour? e) Industrial process? 3. Will a drinking water supply be developed that serves more than a single - family residence? 4. Will you_be processing seafood? 5. Will food service be provided to the public or workers? X 6. Will the project result in dredging or disposal of fill in wetlands or placement of a structure in waterways? (Note: If you are applying to the Corps of Engineers for a permit for this activity, the Corps will automatically request certification from DEC.) 7. Is on-lot sewage or greywater-disposal involved or necessary? 8. Will your project result in the development of a currently unpermitted facility for the disposal of domestic or industrial solid waste? 9. Will your project require offshore drilling or vessel transport of oil, or other petroleum products as cargo, or include onshore facilities with an effective storage capacity of greater than 10,000 barrels of such products? . -6 k 10: Will.your project require the application of oil or pesticides to the surface of the land ?. • IF YOU CORRECTLY ANSWERED }NO TO ALL THESE QUESTIONS, YOU DO NOT'NEED A PERMIT OR OTHER APPROVAL FROWTH [LASKA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION (DEC). GO TO PART F. . IF YOU ANSWERED YES TO ANY OF THESE QUESTIONS (SEE CLARIFYING NOTE IN NO. 6, ABOVE) CONTACT THE DEC AEtIONAL OFFICE TO IDENTIFY -AND OBTAIN ANY NECESSARY APPLICATION FORMS. Yes If you have already contacted the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation,. are you now submitting an application for permit(s)? If yes, list the permits for which you arenow.applying: / n Lht1 . � 1 � , 7L0 apPr >�t 3 fc°JhdJ R sr.�� p- �� , If you are not applying for permits, indicate the reason below: a. (DEC contact) told me on (date) that no DEC approvals or permits were required for this project. b. Other. * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * *. * * PART F To the best of my knowledge, this information is accurate and complete. s. i Signe '' Date TO COMPLETE YOUR PACKET, PLEASE ATTACH YOUR STATE PERMIT APPLICATIONS AND COPIES OF YOUR FEDERAL APPLICATIONS. TO THIS QUESTIONNAIRE. PLEASE SUBMIT YOUR PACKET AS INDICATED ON PAGE ONE. k No cp questionnaire /PERMIT May 9, 1989 Robert S. Burd Director. Water Division Environmental Protection Agency 1200 6th Avenue Seattle, WA 98101 all ALASKAN SEAFOODS, INC. 101 MARINE WAY KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 - (907) 486-3266 Re: Alkod Seafoods, Inc. NPDES'Permit No. AK-000036-1 Dear Mr. Burd: MAY 1G1989 • OFFICE OF nr7VNT & 3UDGE1 MAY 18 1989 lOVERNMENTAf -nr)RniNATiO" We request that the above referenced permit be transferred to All Alaskan Seafoods, Inc. effective June 9, 1989. A11-Alaskan Seafoods recently acquired the plant and property formerly owned by Alkod Seafoods. We anticipate limited used of .the facility for processing this summer. We are aware that the permit.was to expire April 19, 1988. Files from the Alkod plant indicate that Alkod submitted an application for renewal'of the permit on September 22, 1987. Alkod's closure apparently interrupted- the renewal process. We would like to have the permit reactivated to accomodate-our planned use of the facility pending further modifications and improvements in the future. For your information; our plant is adjacent to the Alkod property. If you have further questions, please call me at 907-486-3266. Sincerely. (:41;44a4 44‘" TIMOTHY BLOTT Plant Manager J. AD EC-- v tA)c.- EPA t)r Apo- EM Aochoral 01)19-11 rictiprety. 5- it-24 e)ALtrowni United States Region 10 Alaska Environmental Protection 1200 Sixth Avenue Idaho - Agency Seattle WA 98101 Oregon Washington &EPA SEP 2 5 1989 Reply To Attn Of: WD-134 CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Bill H. Lamoreaux, Regional Supervisor Southcentral Regional Office Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 3601 "C" Street - Suite 1334 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Re: NPDES Permit No. AK-000036-1 All. Alaskan Seafoods, Inc. (Kodiak facility) Dear Mr x: ur NIANASFMENT & SEP 28 1989 OVERNMENT A' - '!r!\! TV Enclosed for your information are copies of a draft National Pollutant Discharge, Elimination System (NPDES) permit which we propose to reissue to the referenced facility, the public notice as it will appear in the local newspaper, and a fact sheet which outlines the basis for the permit. This initiates the 60-day period for state certification action as provided by 40 CFR 124.53. Final action on this permit cannot be taken until your agency has granted or denied certification under 40 CFR 124.55, or waived its right to certify. After the close of the public comment period, we will send a copy of the proposed final permit for use in completing certification action. The state will be deemed to have waived its right to certify unless that right is exercised within 30 days of the receipt of the proposed final permit. Technical questions regarding the permit may be referred to Joe Roberto at (206) 442-1669. Sincerely, Harold E. Geren, Chief Water Permits and Compliance Branch Enclosures cc: Office of Management and Budget, Anchorage United States Region 10 Alaska Environmenta4Protectio, , 1200 Sixth Avenue Idaho .. Agency Seattle WA 98101 Oregon Washington EPA SEP 2 5 1989 Reply To Attn Of: WD-134 CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Timothy Blott, Plant Manager All Alaskan Seafoods, Inc. 101 Marine Way Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Re: NPDES Permit No. AK- 000036 -1 (Kodiak Facility) Dear Mr. Blott: Enclosed for your information are copies of a draft National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit which we propose to reissue to the referenced facility, the public notice as it will appear in the local newspaper, and a fact sheet which outlines the basis for the permit. The Public Notice initiates a 30 -day public comment period. Following the close of the public comment period, we will consider the comments received in preparation of the final permit. Technical questions regarding the permit may be referred to Joe Roberto at (206) 442 -1669. Sincerely, ,f4.06/ Harold E. Geren, Chief Water Permits and Compliance Branch Enclosures cc: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, Anchorage Office of Management. and Budget, Anchorage United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 10 Park Place Building, 13th Floor 1200 Sixth Avenue, WD -134 Seattle,-Washington 98101 (206) 442 -1214 NOTICE OF PROPOSED REISSUANCE OF A NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM ( NPDES) PERMIT TO DISCHARGE TO WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES, NOTICE OF STATE CERTIFICATION, and NOTICE OF STATE DETERMINATION OF CONSISTENCY WITH THE ALASKA COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Public Notice No.: AK- 000036 -1 Public Notice Issuance Date: September 29, 1989 Public Notice Expiration Date: October 30, 1989 1. Applicant All Alaskan Seafoods, Inc. 101 Marine Way Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Permit No.: AK- 000036 -1 The applicant operates a seafood processing - facility which discharges screened process wastewater into St. Paul Harbor. St., Paul Harbor is classified by the Alaska State Water Quality Standards as class 2A, 2B,,,. 2C, and 2D for use in aquaculture, seafood processing, and industrial water supply; contact and secondary water-recreation; growth and propagation of fish, 'shellfish, aquatic life and wildlife;'. and harvesting for the consumption of raw mollusks or other raw aquatic life. A Fact • Sheet is 'available. 2. Tentative Determination The Region 10 Office of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has tentatively-determined to reissue a discharge permit to the above listed •applicant. 3. State Certification This Notice will also serve as Public- Notice of the intent of the State of Alaska, Department of Environmental Conservation to consider certifying that the subject discharge will comply with the applicable provisions of Sections 208(e), 301,- 302, 303, 306 and 307 of the Clean Water Act. The NPDES permit will not be issued until the certification requirements of Section 401 have been met. 4. State•Consistency Determination This Notice will also serve as Public Notice of the intent of the State of Alaska, Office of Management and Budget, Division of Governmental Coordination, to review this action for consistency with the approved Alaska Coastal Management Program. 2 5. Public Comments Persons wishing to comment on the tentative determinations contained in the proposed-permit or wishing to request that a public hearing be held, may do so in writing, within 30 days of the date of this public notice. A. request for a public hearing ShaIl state the nature of the issues to be raised as well as the requester's name, address and telephone number. 'Comments must be received within this 30 day period to be considered in the formulation of final determinations regarding the application. All comments should include the name, address and telephone number of the commenter and a concise statement of the exact basis of any comment and the relevant facts upon which it is based. . All written comments and requests should be submitted to EPA at the above address to the attention of the Director, Water Division. . . Persons wishing to comment -on-State Certification should submit written comments within this 30 day period to theState of Alaska, Southcentral Regional Office, Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC), 3601 "C" Street, Suite 1334, Anchorage, Alaska 99503. . Persons wishing to comment on the State Determination of Consistency with the Alaska Coastal Management Program should submit written comments within this 30 day period, to the State of Alaska, Southcentral Regional Office, Office of Management and Budget, Division of Governmental Coordination, 2600-Denali Street, Suite 700, Anchorage, Alaska 99503. Comments should be addressed to the attention of Alaska Coastal Management Program Consistency Review. 6. Administrative Record The proposed.NPDES permit and other related documents are on file and may be inspected at the above address any time between 8:30 a.m. and 4.:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Copies and other information may be requested by writing to .the EPA at the above address to the attention of the Water Permits Section, or by calling (206) 442-1214. This material is also available from the EPA Alaska Operations Office, Room 537, Federal Bldg., 222W. 7th Ave, #19, Anchorage, Alaska.99513. FACT SHEET United States Environmental Protection. Agency Region 10 Park Place Building, 13th Floor 1200 Sixth Avenue, WD-134 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 442.71214 Permit No.: AK-000036-1 Date: September 29, 1989 PROPOSED REISSUANCE OF A NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE. ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT TO DISCHARGE POLLUTANTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE CLEAN . WATER ACT All Alaskan Seafoods, Inc. 101. Marine Way, Kodiak; Alaska. 99615 has applied for reissuance of a National Pollutant-Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit to discharge pollutants pursuant to the provisions of the Clean Water Act. This fact sheet includes (a) the tentative determination of the Environmental'Protection-Agency (EPA) to reissue the permit, (b) information on public comment, public hearing and appeal procedures, (c) the description of the current discharge, (d) a listing of tentative effluent limitations, schedules of compliance and other conditions, and (e) a sketch or detailed description of the discharge location. We call your special attention to the technical material presented in the latter part of this document. . Persons wishing to comment'on the tentative determinations contained in the proposed permit reissuance,may do .so by the expiration date of the Public Notice. All, written comments,should be submitted to EPA as described in the Public Comments Section of the attached -Public Notice. After the'expiration date of the Public Notice, the Director, Water Division, will make final determinations witivrespect to the permit reissuance. The tentative determinations contained in the draft permit will become.final conditions if nosubstantive comments are received during the Public Notice period. The permit will become effective 30 days after the final determinations are made,'unless a request for an'evidentiary hearing is submitted within 30 days after receipt of the final determinations. The proposed-NPDES permit and other related documents-are on file and may be inspected at the above address any time between 8:30 a.m. and'4:00p.m., Monday through Friday. Copies and other information'may be requested by writing to EPA at the above address to the attention of the Water Permits Section, or by calling (206) 442-1214. This material is also available from the EPA Alaska Operations Office, Room 537, Federal Bldg., 222 West 7th Avenue, #19, Anchorage, Alaska'99513. 2 Technical Information I. Applicant All Alaskan Seafoods, Inc. 101 Marine Way Kodiak, Alaska 99615 NPDES Permit No.: AK- 000036 -1 Contact: Timothy Blott, Plant Manager II. Activity All Alaskan Seafoods, Inc. is a shore -based seafood processing plant in Kodiak, Alaska which specializes in the fresh freezing of salmon, halibut, and other bottomfish. Filleting of bottomfish (except for halibut) and herring will also be conducted. The following table lists the approximate quantity of seafood expected to be processed: Seafood Type Raw Seafood Processed (lbs /day) Bottomfish 370,000 Crab 150,000 Herring 120,000 Salmon (Hand Butchered) 150,000 Salmon (Mechanized) 180,000 Scallops 30,000 This facility will be processing seafood year round. Process water obtained from the city of Kodiak is rechlorinated prior to use. III. Receiving Water A. The permittee discharges into St. Paul Harbor through Outfall 001. B. A map of the facility location is included on page 7 of this fact sheet. C. St. Paul Harbor is classified by the Alaska State Water Quality Standards as Classes (2)(A)(i)(ii)(iii), (B)(i)(ii), (C), and (D), for use in aquaculture, seafood processing and industrial water supply, contact and secondary water recreation, growth and propagation of fish, shellfish, other aquatic life, and wildlife, and harvesting for the consumption of raw mollusks or other raw aquatic life. D. The state water quality parameters which could be affected by the discharge are dissolved gas, pH, turbidity, oil and grease, residual chlorine, floating solids, total suspended solids and settleable solids. IV. Background A. The original NPDES permit, No. AK-000036-1, issued to Swiftsure Alaska, Inc., became effective June 2, 1975, and expired on May 31, 1980. The permit was then transferred to Kodiak Swiftsure Corporation on June 19, 1980. Since then, the permit was reissued to Kodiak Swiftsure Corporation. The permit became effective on April 20, 1983, and expired on April 19, 1988. During its five year life, the reissued permit was transferred to Northstar Seafoods, Inc., and Alkod Seafoods, Inc. on December 1, 1983, and February 1, 1987, respectively. An application for permit reissuance was received from Alkod Seafoods, Inc. on September 28, 1987. On June 9, 1989, the facility was purchased by All Alaskan Seafoods, Inc. The conditions of the expired permit remain in effect as required by 40 CFR Part 122.6. B. Existing industrial treatment facilities consist of grinding seafood wastes (113 - 112 inch square) and transmitting the effluent across a double sided tangential screen. The screened waste then is transported to Kodiak Reduction, Inc. An alternative ocean dumping location is specified in the NPDES permit in the event that the permittee is unable to dispose of collected seafood waste through Kodiak Reduction, Inc. C. Sanitary wastewater is currently being discharged, to the city of Kodiak Wastewater Treatment Plant. D. The facility maintains one industrial outfall line located 150 feet from the shore and 11 feet below the water surface-at mean lower low water. V. Basis of Limitations and Monitoring Requirements A. Effluent Limitations Effluent limitatiOns in the permit (Part I.A.I.a.) are EPA guidelines developed for the Canned and Preserved Seafood Processing Point Source Category (40 CFR 408),.. The guidelines, are based on the Best Conventional Pollutant Control Technology (BCT). BCT for non-remote locations such as Kodiak is established as fine-mesh screening. When more than one species is processed on the sampling day, the effluent limitation for that day is based on the.proportion of each species processed. Variable monthly limits are also based on the proportion of each species processed. EPA has determined that this method of determining a variable limit is appropriate, since EPA guidelines (40 CFR 408) are expressed in terms of pounds of pollutant per 1000 pounds of raw product processed. The method to determine the variable limitations and an example calculation are included. in Attachments 1 and 2 of the permit.' 4 B. Alaska State Water Quality Standards Limitations on pH, visible environmental impacts, receiving water accumulations and shoreline accumulations are based on Alaska State Water Quality Standards. These standards apply to all discharges from the facility, including process and non - process wastewater. C. Residual Chlorine Total Residual. Chlorine monitoring of process wastewater is required in the permit. Process water is chlorinated prior to use in processing operations for disinfection purposes. Monitoring of residual chlorine in the effluent is required to assess the impacts of this pollutant in the receiving environment. D. Monitoring Requirements Monitoring (Part I.A.I.f., g. and h.) is required pursuant to 40 CFR 122.44(1) and is necessary for determining compliance with permit effluent limitations and to evaluate potential water quality impacts resulting from the discharge. Monitoring frequencies are based on the Agency's determination of the minimum sampling required to adequately monitor facility performance. Monitoring results will be reported in monthly Discharge Monitoring Reports. E. Ultimate Solids Disposal The proposed NPDES permit requires that all collected solids shall be disposed of at a reduction facility. However, if the permittee is temporarily unable to utilize a reduction facility, the permittee may dispose of the collected solids via barging or other transport, without loss, to a seafood waste disposal zone (see Part I.A.1.i. and Figure 1 of this permit). F. Harvest Records Harvest record submittals in the proposed NPDES permit (Part I.A.1.j.) are necessary to characterize the type and amount of pollutants discharged into St. Paul Harbor. 5 G. Other Requirements 1. Dive.Survey Recent dive surveys in Petersburg (EPA, 1987) and Kodiak (EPA, 1988) have documented water quality impacts from screened seafood processing wastewater. Based on these findings, an annual dive survey is required in this permit in order to determine compliance with state water quality standards (including the prohibition of waste pile accumulations) as well as the extent of the impacts on the receiving water due to the discharge of seafood wastes. •The dive is scheduled at the end of the salmon processing season, which is the maximum production period. 2. Waste Disposal Practices The permit requires the permittee to develop a plan which details procedures to be implemented for disposal of collected seafood waste in the event the primary waste disposal method (i.e. by-product recovery) is not available. Any discharge of wastewaters to St. Paul Harbor that does not meet permit effluent limitations is not an alternative. Development of this plan would require careful review of-the company's waste disposal options. This requirement is necessary to insure that a viable option for waste disposal is pursued prior to any situation in which the current method is temporarily unavailable. 3. Other Waste Discharges Part authorizes the discharge of non-process wastewaters through conveyances other than outfall 001. These wastes include: cooling water, boiler water, freshwater pressure relief discharges, and water used in live tanks. This authorization is based on the characteristics of the wastewater from these activities. These waters are expected to contain relatively minor concentrations of conventional pollutants (TSS, BOD, Oil and Grease) and small quantities of solids. Therefore it is not expected to adversely affect the receiving waters. 4. Notification of Changes in Capacity Part I.B.4..of the permit is required to assure that the EPA and ADEC are notified of any potential increases in the amount of pollutants being discharged. This will allow an evaluation. of the impact of the increasedpollutant loading on the receiving water. 6 5. Reopener Clause Part 1.8.6. of the proposed permit is required pursuant to 40 CFR 122.82' 6. Alaska Water Quality Standards Part I'B'7. is a general condition which requires compliance with Alaska Water Quality Standards. This is required pursuant to Section 301 of the Clean Water Act. H. Other Conditions This permit will expire five years from the effective date. !D Eagle Fisheries, Inc. /, Pe International Seafoods of Alaska - 4101 East Point Seafood Co. t 0 All Alaskan Seafoods, Inc. ( } All Alaskan Seafoods, Inc. (AK- 000036 -I) ® Alaska Fresh Seafoods, ® Cook Inlet Processing, 411Faros Seafoods, Inc. Ursin Seafoods, Inc: CO International Seafoods © Western Alaska Fisheries, Inc. Inc. of Alaska Inc. Q King Crab, Inc. 'D Alaska Pacific Seafoods, Inc. Kodiak Reduction Facility ® Barge Beaver (loading wharf) n or o 0 \;a �� 0,,' t %ryf�q! /� `wJ►w s www``� 4/ �Nrriar,�rullrNl�rNINNm ",, ww•\ 1 .` A. OP IM r, 00 �1111I„11p 11 FR r"i1 R . . 12—'11 12 12 ry 12 12 II; 7 �' ; 1,1 id. I; i 11 o 12 11 �.' • ... s:.. 9 S 010kIFt oil ., 7 �,. ''. 7 ..3 _ " Sr: . • 7, r ;• .,,i�c.. r' 9 S• 7; '+ S T~' ; ' R'�l0' 9� C r :% 7. 7': 212 1 FIR 2.Ssec 49 M Ate:: 9 e:, /� f i B • YI 9 9' -.. a /.4 1 ,R d 9; 7 8 7; 2 f 3; 7 9 8 Seafood Processors in Kodiak, Alaska Rr 7 71 8 7 1_1$ G i 2�i4 b1 IS 17 O N L Permit No.: AK- 000036 -1 Application No.: AK- 000036 -1 United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 10 1200 Sixth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101 AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE-UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §1251 et sec., as amended by the Water Quality Act of 1987, P.L. 100 -4, the "Act ", ALL ALASKAN SEAFOODS; INC. is authorized to discharge from a seafood processing facility located in Kodiak, Alaska, to receiving waters named St. Paul Harbor, in accordance with discharge points), effluent limitations, monitoring requirements and other conditions set forth herein. This permit shall become effective This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight, Signed this day of DRAFT Director, Water Division, Region 10 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency September 29, 1989 • Page 2 of 20 Permit No.: AK-000036-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cover Sheet--Issuance and Expiration Dates 1. Effluent Limitations and Monitoring Requirements A. Specific Limitations and Monitoring Requirements B. Other Requirements C. Definitions II. Monitoring, Recording and Reporting Requirements • A. Representative Sampling B. Monitoring Procedures C. Reporting of Monitoring Results • D. , Additional Monitoring by the Permittee E. Records Contents F. Retention of Records G. Twenty-four Hour Notice of Noncompliance Reporting H. Other Noncompliance Reporting I. Inspection and Entry III. Compliance Responsibilities A. Duty to Comply B. Penalties for Violations of Permit Conditions C. Need to Halt or Reduce Activity not a Defense D. Duty to Mitigate •E. Proper Operation and Maintenance F. Removed Substances G. Bypass of Treatment Facilities H. Upset Conditions I. Toxic Pollutants IV. General Requirements A. Changes in Discharge of Toxic Substances B. Planned Changes C. Anticipated Noncompliance 0. Permit Actions E. Duty to Reapply F. Duty to Provide Information G. Other Information H. Signatory Requirements I. Availability of Reports J. Oil and Hazardous Substance Liability K. Property Rights L. Severability M. Transfers N. State Laws ATTACHMENT 1 ATTACHMENT 2 FIGURE 1 DRAFT Page 3 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000036 -1 I. EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS A. Specific Limitations and Monitoring Requirements. 1 During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting through the expiration date, the permittee is authorized to discharge process wastewater to St. Paul Harbor from outfall 001. Treatment of process wastewater prior to discharge shall be accomplished through the use of fine mesh screening (1 mm) without grinding, or equivalent technology. a. Process discharges shall be limited as specified below (limitations are dependent upon the raw products processed on the day samples are collected): Raw Seafood Product Discharge Limitations • Monthly Average Daily Maximum Total Suspended Oil & Solids (TSS) Grease Alaskan Bottomfish (Includes Halibut, and other Bottomfish) (lbs /1,000 lbs raw bottomfish) 1.9 0.56 Oil & TSS Grease 3.1 4.3 Non - Remote Alaskan Whole 3.9 0.42 12 1.3 Crab and Crab Section (lbs /1,000 lbs raw crab), Alaskan Herring 24 10 32 27 • (lbs /1,000 lbs raw herring) Alaskan Hand Butchered 1.6 0.19 2.6 0.31 Salmon (lbs /1,000 lbs raw salmon) Alaskan Mechanized Salmon • 26 11 44 29 (lbs /1,000 lbs raw salmon) Alaskan Scallop. 1.4 0.24 6.6 7.7 (lbs /1,000 lbs raw scallops) Multiple Species - - -- See Attachment 1 - - -- �(lbs /1,000 lbs raw seafood) b. The pH shall. not be less.than.6.5 standard units nor greater than 8.5 standard units. c. There shall be no discharge of floating solids, visible foam or oily wastes which produce a sheen on the surface of the receiving water. d. No wastes shall accumulate on the shoreline nor float on the receiving water surface. D;AFT Page 4 of 20 Permit No.: AK-000036-1 e. There shall be no accumulation of wastes on-the bottom of the receiving water. f Discharges shall be monitored by the permit tee as specified below: Units of Parameter Measure Monitoring Frequency Sample Type Flow . mgd Continuously TSS mg/1- One/week 24-Hour Composite Oil and Grease Settleable Solids mg/1 mg/1 One/week One/week Residual Chlorine* mg/1 One/week for 1 year pH Standard • One/week units Grab '24-Hour Composite Grab Grab Estimated Quantity of . Pounds Monthly Estimate Seafood Disposed via the seafood dumping zone. • Estimated Quantity of Pounds Seafood Disposed via the reduction facility. Status of Waste Handling -- System Mon thl y Estimate Daily Inspection At least one half of the residual chlorine samples will be taken during or immediately after the plant sanitization'procedure. Monitoring 'calculations for daily discharges shall be calculated as follows: lbs pollutant/1,000 lbs raw product (flow, mqd) x (conc. of pollutant, mg/1) x (8,340) (Total lbs processed during the sampling day) g The daily discharges calculated shall be compared to limitations in Part I.A.1.a. •An example calculation is included in attachment 2. These calculations shall be included in monthly Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs). h. Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirements specified above (Part I.A.l.f.) shall 'collected after treatment and prior to discharge from outfall 001. DRAFT Page 5 of 20 Permit No.: AK-000036-1 1. In the event the permittee is temporarily unable to dispose of collected seafood waste by means of by-product recovery, the permittee may dispose of said waste in the seafood dumping zone identified in Figure 1 of this permit, pursuant to the Marine Protection Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (Public Law 92-532). The zone is generally bordered by the Base Line to the east and the fifty (50) fathom line plotted on U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Map No. 8534. The EPA and the local U.S. Coast Guard office shall be notified by telephone at least four hours prior to the occurrence of any dumping of any seafood waste. l• The Director may modify the location of the dumping zone or the provisions under which the wastes are dumped (i.e. mandatory grinding to 1/2 inch prior to dumping) if the wastes are creating an environmental concern, creating a nuisance or violating state water quality standards. The permittee shall submit with their monitoring report, as indicated in Part processing records, indicating the quantity and type of raw seafood processed on each day of the reporting month as well as the quantity and type of end product produced (e.g., fillets, frozen whole). The quantities shall be expressed in pounds. B. Other Requirements. 1. Dive Survey Underwater dive surveys at outfall 001 shall be conducted once per year. Dive surveys shall be -conducted within .seven days after the termination of salmon processing but no later than October 15. The diver shall inspect the area under the dock as well as the outfall along its entire length. The diver shall also inspect the area at the end of the outfall pipe and document the type, depth, areal extent, estimated volume, and sizes of particles of any waste accumulation. The permittee shall submit to EPA and ADEC within 30 days after each dive, a report including: a) Location (including distance from-shore and compass orientation), depth, and condition .(including presence, Size, and location of any breaks or cracks) of the outfall line. b) Water depth at the end of the outfall pipe. c) A plan view drawing (to scale) indicating the location of the dock, outfall pipe, prominent bottom features such as depressions, pockets, and large rocks, secondary slurry, zones, and any areas where seafood wastes have accumulated. The drawing shall also include the location, number and species of benthic organisms observed during the dive and an indication of whether the organisms observed. are alive, dead or stressed. • DRAFT Page 6 of 20 Permit No.:. AK-000036-1 d) A profile drawing (to scale) showing'the dimensions of any waste accumulation. e) Types of substrate in and adjacent to the outfall area. 2. Waste Disposal Practices The permittee shall develop a plan which details procedures to be implemented for proper alternate disposal of collected seafood waste in the event the. primary waste disposal method (i.e., by-product recovery) is not available. Any discharge of wastewaters to St. Paul Harbor that does not meet permit effluent limitations is not analternative. The permittee shall submit to EPA and the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC) the alternative waste disposal plan within 30 days.from the effective date of this permit. 3. Other Wastewater Discharges During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting through the expiration date, the permittee may discharge through conveyances other than outfall 001 all cooling water, boiler water, freshwater pressure relief discharges, and water used in live tanks provided the limitations in Parts I.A.1.(b), (c), (d), and (e) are met for each discharge. All water used to transfer fish from vessels to the facility shall be discharged through outfall 001. 4. Notification of Changes in Capacity The permittee shall give notice to the Director and ADEC of any planned physical alterations or operational changes to the permitted facility which will result in the processing of more than the following amounts of raw seafood in a single day: Species Maximum Daily Production Bottomfish - 370,000 pounds Crab 150,000 pounds Herring 120,000 pounds Salmon (Hand Butchered) 150,000 pounds Salmon '(Mechanized) 180,000 pounds Scallops 30,000 pounds Notification shall be given at, least ninety (90) days prior to implementation of the planned changes. 5. Sanitary Discharge • The discharge of sanitary wastewater is not authorized under this. permit. DAFT Page 7 of 20 Permit No.: AK-000036-1 6. Reopener Clause Upon promulgation of effluent limitation guidelines applicable to this facility the permit shall be modified, if the guidelines contain limits different from those contained in this permit. If there is evidence indicating potential or realized impacts :on water quality due to the discharge.of seafood processing wastes, the permit'may be modified to include different effluent.limitations and/or additional monitoring requirements. . 7. Alaska Water Quality Standards All discharges shall be in compliance with Alaska Water Quality Standards (18 AAC 70). FT ' Page 8 of 20 Permit No.: AK-000036-1 D. Definitions. 1. "Accumulation" refers to the presence of any measurable ,amount of seafood waste present on the bottbm substrate. For purposes of this permit, measurable is defined as a thickness of one centimeter or more. . 2; "Bypass" means the intentional diversion of waste•streams from any portion of a treatment facility. 3. "Daily discharge" means the discharge of a pollutant measured . during a calendar day or any 24-hour period that reasonably represents the calendar day for purposes of sampling. For pollutants with limitations expressed in units of Mass, the "daily discharge" is calculated. as the total mass of the .' pollutant discharged over the day. For pollutants with limitations.expressed in other units of Measurement, the "daily discharge" is calculated as the average measurement of the pollutant over the day. . _ . 4. "Daily Maximum" discharge means the highest "daily discharge." 5. "Grab" sample is a single sample or measurement taken at a specific time or over as short a period of time as is feasible. 6. "Monthly Average" discharge means the sum of.all "daily discharges" measured during a calendar month divided by the number of "daily discharges" measured during that month. 7. "Quantity of Waste" is calculated as follows: Quantity of Waste = (Quantity of Raw Seafood) - (Quantity of Finished Product). 8. "Severe property damage" means substantial physical damage to property, damage to the treatment facilities which causes them to become inoperable, or substantial and permanent loss of natural resources which can reasonably be expected to occur in the absence of a bypass. Severe property damage does not mean economic loss caused by delays in production. 9. A "24-hour composite" sample shall mean a flow-proportioned mixture of not less than 8 discrete aliquots. Each aliquot shall be a grab sample of not less than 100 ml and shall be collected and stored in accordance with procedures prescribed in the most recent edition of Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 10. "Upset" means an exceptional .incident in-which there is unintentional and temporary noncompliance with technology-based permit effluent limitations because of factors beyond the reasonable control'of the permittee. An upset does not include noncompliance to the extent caused by operational error, 'improperly designed treatment facilities, inadequate treatment facilities, lack'of preventive maintenance, or careless or improper operation.. Page 9 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000036 -1 11. "Waste Handling System" means the system used to collect, transfer, treat (e.g. grind, chop, remove via screens, etc.) and dispose of process wastes. This includes, but is not limited to, flumes, pipes, screens, grinders, evaporators, centrifuges, outfall, etc. 12. "Weekly average" discharge means the sum of all "daily discharges" measured during a week divided by the number of "daily discharges" measured during that week. If a single sample is taken in a week, then that sample result represents the "weekly average" discharge. DRAFT Page 10 of 20 Permit No.: AK-000036-1 II. MONITORING, RECORDING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS A. Representative Sampling. Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirements established under Part I shall be collected from the effluent stream prior to discharge into the receiving • waters. Samples and measurements shall be representative of the •volume and nature of the monitored discharge. • Monitoring Procedures. Monitoring must beconducted according to test procedures approved under 40 CFR Part 136, unless other test procedures have been specified in this permit. C. Reporting of Monitoring Results. Monitoring results shall be summarized each month on the Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) form (EPA No. 3320-1). The reports shall be submitted monthly and are to be postmarked by. the 10th day of the following month. •Legible copies of these, and all other reports, shall be signed and certified in accordance with the requirements of Part IV.H., Signatory Requirements, and submitted to the Director, Water Division and the State agency at the following addresses: original to: United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 10 1200 Sixth Avenue, WD-135 Seattle, Washington '98101 copy to: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC) Southcentral Region 3601 "C" Street, Suite 1334 Anchorage„ Alaska 99503 DAFT T Page 11 of 20 Permit No.: AK-000036-1 D. Additional Monitoring by the Permittee. If the permittee monitors any pollutant more frequently than required by this permit, using test procedures approved under 40 CFR 136 or as specified in this permit, the results of this monitoring shall be included in the calculation and reporting of the data submitted in the DMR. Such increased frequency shall also be indicated. E. Records Contents. Records of monitoring information shall include: 1. The date, exact place, and time of sampling or measurements; 2. The individual(s) who performed the sampling or measurements; 3. The date(s) analyses were performed; 4. The individual(s) who performed the analyses; 5. The analytical techniques or methods used; and 6. The results of such analyses. F. Retention of Records. The permittee shall retain records of all monitoring information, including all calibration and maintenance records and all original strip chart recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation, copies of all reports required by this permit, and records of all data used to complete the application for this permit, for a period of at least three years from the date of the sample, measurement, report or application. This period may be extended by request of the Director or ADEC at any time. Data collected on-site, copies of Discharge Monitoring Reports:, and a copy of this NPDES permit must be maintained on-site during the duration of activity at the permitted location. G. Twenty-four Hour Notice of Noncompliance Reporting. 1. The following occurrences of noncompliance- shall be reported by telephone within 24 hours from the time the permittee becomes aware of the circumstances: a. Any noncompliance which may endanger health or the environment; b. Any unanticipated bypass which exceeds any effluent limitation in the permit (See Part III.G., Bypass of Treatment Facilities.); c. Any upset which exceeds any effluent limitation in the permit (See Part III.H., Upset Conditions.); or d. Violation of a maximum daily discharge limitation for any of the pollutants listed in the permit to be reported within 24 hours. DRAFT Page 12 of 20 Permit No.: AK-000036-1 2. A written submission shall also be provided within five days of the time that the permittee becomes aware of the circumstances. The written submission shall contain: a. A description of the noncompliance and its cause; b. The period of noncompliance, including exact dates and times' , c. The estimated time noncompliance is expected to continue if it has not been corrected' , and d. Steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent reoccurrence of the noncompliance. The Director may waive the written report on a case-by-case basis if the oral report has been received within 24 hours by the Water Compliance Section in Seattle, Washington, by phone, (206) 442-1213' 4. Reports shall be submitted to the addresses in Part II.C., Reporting of Monitoring Results. H. Other Noncompliance Reporting. Instances of noncompliance not required to be reported within 24 hours shall be reported at the time that monitoring reports for Part II'C' are submitted. The reports shall contain the information listed in Part II.G.2. I. Inspection and Entry. The permittee shall allow the Director, ADEC, or an authorized representative (including an authorized contractor acting as a representative of the Administrator), upon the presentation of credentials and other documents as may be required by law, to: 1. Enter upon the permitte 's premises where a regulated facility or activity is located or conducted, or where records must be kept under the conditions of this permit; 2. Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the conditions of this permit; 3. Inspect at reasonable times any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and control equipment), practices, or operations regulated or required under this permit; and 4. Sample or monitor at reasonable times, for the purpose of assuring permit compliance or as otherwise authorized by the Act, any substances or parameters at any location. Ai„ /-'. Page 13 of 20 Permit No.: AK_000036-1 III. COMPLIANCE RESPONSIBILITIES A. Duty to Comply. The permittee must comply with all conditions of this permit. Any permit noncompliance constitutes a violation of the Act and is grounds for enforcement action; for permit termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification; or for denial of a permit renewal applicatinn. The permittee shall give advance notice to the Director and ADEC of any planned changes in the permitted facility or activity which may result in noncompliance with permit requirements. B. Penalties for Violations of Permit Conditions. 1. Civil Penalty. The Act provides that any person who violates a permit condition implementing Sections 381, 302, 306, 307, 300, 318, or 405 of the Act shall be subject to a civil penalty, not to exceed $25,000 per day for each violation. 2. Criminal Penalties: a. Negligent Violations. The Act provides that any person who negligently violates a permit condition implementing Sections 301, 302, 306, 307, 308, 318, or 405 of.the Act shall be punished by a fine of not less than $2,500 nor more than $25,000 per day of violation, or by imprisonment for not more than l year, or by both. b. Knowing Violations. The Act provides that any person who knowingly violates a permit condition implementing Sections 301, 302, 306, 307, 308, 318, 405 of the Act shall be punished by a fine of not less than $5,000 nor more than $50,000 per day of violation, or by imprisonment for not more than 3 years, or by both, c. Knowing Endangerment. The Act provides that any person who knowingly violates a permit condition implementing Sections 301, 302, 306, 307, 308, 318, or 405 of the Act, and who knows at that time that he thereby places another person in imminent danger of death or serious bodily injury, shall, upon conviction, be subject to a fine of not more than $250,000 or imprisonment of not more than 15 years, or both.' A person which is an organization shall, upon conviction of violating this subparagraph, be subject to a fine of not more than $1.000.000. d. False Statements. The Act provides that any person who knowingly makes any false material statement, representation, or certification in any appl\catiOn, record, report, plan, or other document filed or required to be 08intaiD8d,Und8r this Act or who knowingly falsifies, tampers with, or renders inaccurate any monitoring device or method required to be maintained under this Act, shall upon conviction, be punished by a fine of not more that $10,000. or by imprisonment for not more than 2 years, or by both. AFi Page 14 of 20 Permit No.: AK-000036-1 Except as provided in permit conditions in Part III.G., Bypass of Treatment Facilities and Part III.H., Upset Conditions, nothing in this permit shall be construed to relieve the permittee of the civil or criminal penalties for noncompliance. C. Need to Halt or Reduce Activity not a Defense. It shall not be a defense for a permittee in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted, activity in order to maintain compliance with the conditions of this permit. D. Duty to Mitigate. The permittee shall take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any discharge in violation of this permit which has a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting human health or the environment. E. Proper Operation and Maintenance. The permittee shall at all times properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems of treatment and control (and related appurtenances) which are installed or used by the permittee to achieve compliance with the conditions of this permit. Proper operation and maintenance also includes adequate laboratory controls and appropriate quality assurance procedures. This provision requires the operation of back-up or auxiliary facilities or similar systems which are installed by a permittee only when the operation is necessary to achieve compliance with the conditions of the permit. F. Removed Substances. Solids, sludges, filter backwash, or other pollutants removed in the course of treatment or control of wastewaters shall be disposed of in a manner such as to prevent any pollutant from such materials from entering navjgable waters. RAF Page 15 of 20 Permit No.: AK-000036-1 G. Bypass of Treatment Facilities: T. Bypass not exceeding limitations. ,The permittee may allow any bypass to occur which does not cause effluent limitations to be exceeded, but only if it also is for essential maintenance _ to assure efficient operation. These bypasses are not subject to the provisions of paragraphs 2 and 3 of this section. 2. NotiCe: a. Anticipated bypass. If the permittee knows in advance of the need for a bypass, it shall submit prior notice, if possible at least 10 days before the date of the bypass. b. Unanticipated bypass. The permittee shall submit notice of an unanticipated bypass as required under Part II.G., Twenty-four Hour Notice of Noncompliance Reporting. 3. Prohibition of bypass. a. Bypass is prohibited and the Director or ADEC may take enforcement action against a permittee for a bypass, unless: (1) The bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life, personal injury, or severe property damage; (2) There were no feasible alternatives to the bypass, such as the use of auxiliary treatment facilities, retention of untreated wastes., or,maintenance during normal periods of equipment downtime. This condition is not satisfied if adequate back-up equipment should have been installed in the exercise of reasonable engineering judgment to prevent a bypass which occurred during normal periods of equipment downtime or preventive maintenance; and • (3)- The permittee submitted notices as required under paragraph 2 of this section. *b. The Director and ADEC may approve an anticipated bypass, after considering its adverse effects, if the Director and ADEC determine that it will meet the three conditions listed above in paragraph 3.a. of this section. DRAiri Page 16 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000036 -1 H. Upset Conditions. 1. Effect of an upset. An upset constitutes an affirmative defense to an action brought for noncompliance with such technology based permit effluent limitations if the requirements of paragraph 2 of this section are met. No determination made during administrative review of claims that noncompliance was caused by upset, and before an action for noncompliance, is final administrative action subject to judicial review. 2. Conditions necessary for a demonstration of upset. A permittee who wishes to establish the affirmative defense of upset shall demonstrate, through properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs, or other relevant evidence that: a. An upset occurred and that the permittee can identify the cause(s) of the upset; b. The permitted facility was at the time being properly , operated; c. The permittee submitted notice of the upset as required under Part II.G., Twenty -four Hour Notice of'Noncompliance Reporting; and d. The permittee complied with any remedial measures required under Part III.D., Duty to Mitigate. 3. Burden of proof. In any enforcement proceeding, the permittee seeking to establish the occurrence of an upset has the burden of proof. I. Toxic Pollutants. The permittee shall comply with effluent standards-or prohibitions established under:Section 307(a) of the . Act for toxic pollutants within the time provided in'the regulations that establish those standards or prohibitions, even if the permit has not yet been modified to incorporate the requirement. Page 17 of 20 Permit No.: AK-000036-1 IV. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS A. Changes in Discharge of Toxic Substances. Notification shall be provided to the Director and ADEC as soon as the penVittee Knows of, or has reason to believe: 1. That any activity has occurred or will occur which would result in the discharge, on a routine or frequent basis, of any toxic pollutant which is not limited in the permit, if that discharge will exceed the highest of the following "notification levels": a. One hundred micrograms per liter (103 Vg/l); b. Two hundred micrograms per liter (200 Vg/l) for acrolein and acrylonitrile; five hundred micrograms per liter (500 ug/l) for 2,4-dinitrophenol and for 2-methyl-4, 6-dinitr0phenol; and one milligram per liter (1 mg/1) for antimony; c. Five (5) times the maximum concentration value reported for that pollutant in the permit application in accordance with 40 CFR 122'21(g)(7); or d. The level established by the Director in accordance with 40 CFR 122.44(f)' 2. That any activity has occurred or will occur which would result in any discharge, on a non-routine or infrequent basis, of a toxic pollutant which is not limited in the permit, if that discharge will exceed the highest of the following "notification levels": a. Five hundred micrograms per liter (500 ug/l); b. One milligram per liter (1 mg/1) for antimony; c. Ten (10) times the maximum concentration value reported for that pollutant in the permit application in accordance with 40 CFR 122.21(g)(7); or d. The level established by the Director in accordance with 40 CFR 122.44(f). 8. Planned Changes. The permittee shall give notice to the Director and ADEC as soon as possible of any planned physical alterations or additions to the permitted facility. Notice is required only when: 1. The alteration or addition to a permitted facility may meet one of the criteria for determining whether a facility is a new source as determined in 40 CFR 122.29(b); or 2. The alteration or addition could significantly change the nature or increase the quantity of pollutants discharged. This notification applies to pollutants which are subject neither to effluent limitations in the permit, nor to notification requirements under Part IV.A,l. Page 18 of 20 Permit No.: &K-000038-1 C. Anticipated Noncompliance. The permittee shall also give advance notice to the Director and ADEC of any planned changes in the permitted facility or activity which may result in noncompliance with permit requirements. D. Permit Actions. This permit may be modified, revoked and reissued, or terminated for cause. The filing of a request by the permittee for a permit modification, revocation and reissuance, or termination, or a notification of planned changes or anticipated noncompliance, does not stay any permit condition. E. Duty to Reapply. If the permittee wishes to continue an activity regulated by this permit after the expiration date of this permit, the permittee must apply for and obtain a new permit. The application should be submitted at least 180 days before the expiration date of this permit. F. Duty to Provide Information. The permittee shall furnish to the Director and ADEC, within a reasonable time, any information which the Director or ADEC may request to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and reissuing, or terminating this permit, or to determine compliance with this permit. The permittee shall also furnish to the Director or ADEC, upon request, copies of records required to be kept by this permit. G. Other Information. When the permittee becomes aware that it failed to submit any relevant facts in a permit applicati0n, or submitted incorrect information in a permit application or any report to the Director or ADEC, it shall promptly submit such facts or information' H. Signatory Requirements. All applications, reports or information submitted to the Director and ADEC shall be signed and certified. 1. All permit applications shall be signed as follows: a. For a corporation: by a responsible corporate officer. b. For a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the proprietor, respectively. C' For a municipality, state, federal, or other public agency: by either a principal executive officer or ranking elected official. 2. All reports required by the permit and other information requested by the Director or ADEC shall be signed by a person described above or by a duly authorized representative of that person. A person is a duly authorized representative only if: a. The authorization is made in writing by a person described above and submitted to the Director and ADEC, and , Page 19 of 20 Permit No.: AK-000036—I b. The authorization specified either an individual or a position having responsibility for the overall operation of the regulated facility or activity, such as the position of plant manager, operator of a well or a well field, superintendent, position of equivalent responsibility, or an individual or position having overall.responsibility for environmental matters for-the company. (A duly authorized representative may thus be either a named individual or any individual occupying a named position.) 3. Changes to authorization. . If an authorization under paragraph IV.H.2. is no longer accurate because .a-different individual or position has responsibility for theoverall-operation of the facility, a new authorization satisfying the requirements of paragraph.IV.H.2. must be submitted,to.the Director and ADEC prfor.to or together with any reports, information, or applications to be signed by an authorized representative. 4. Certification. Any person signing a-document under this section shall imake the following certification:' • "I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations:" • Availability of Reports. Except for data determined to be confidential under 40 CFR Part 2, all reports prepared in accordance with the terms of this permit shall be available for public inspection at the offices of the Director and ADEC. As required by the Act, permit applications, permits and effluent data shall not be considered confidential. . Oil and Hazardous Substance Liability. Nothing in this permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal action or relieve the permittee from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties to which the permittee is or may be subject under Section 311 of the Act. K. Property Rights. The issuance of this permit does not convey any property rights of any sort, or any exclusive privileges, nor does it authorize any injury to private property or any invasion of personal rights, nor any infringement of federal, state or local laws or regulations. Page 20 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000036 -1 L. Severability. The provisions of this permit are severable, and if any provision of this permit, or the application of any provision of this permit to any circumstance, is held invalid, the application of such provision to other circumstances, and the, remainder of this permit, shall not be affected thereby. M. Transfers. This permit may be automatically- transferred to a new permittee if: 1. The current permittee notifies the Director at least 30 days in advance of the proposed transfer date; 2. The notice includes a written agreement between the existing and new permittees containing a specific date for transfer of permit responsibility, coverage, and liability between them; and 3. The Director does not notify the existing permittee and the proposed new permittee of his or her intent to modify, or revoke and reissue the permit. If this notice is not received, the transfer is effective on the date specified in the agreement mentioned in paragraph 2 above. N. State Laws. Nothing in this permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal action or relieve-the permittee from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties established pursuant to any applicable state law or regulation under authority preserved by Section 510 of the Act. Attachment 1 - Limitations for Mult le S ecies Processin Effluent limitations for the processing of multiple species are derived using the following "generic" equation: (1) Limit in lbs/1000 lbs = (Bottomfish Limit)(, Bottomfish) + (Crab Limit)(% Crab) + (Herring Limit)(°L Herring) + (HB Salmon Limit)(% HB Salmon) + (Mech Salmon Limit)(% Mech Salmon) + (Scallop Limit)(% Scallop) where, % Bottomfish % Crab % Herring = Amount of bottomfish processed divided by the total amount of seafood processed (Amount of Bottomfish) / (Amount of Raw Seafood) Amount of crab processed divided by the total amount of seafood processed (Amount of Crab) / (Amount of Raw Seafood) Amount of herring processed divided by the total amount of seafood processed (Amount of Herring) / (Amount of Raw Seafood) % HB Salmon = Amount of hand-butchered salmon divided by the total amount of seafood processed (Amount of HB Salmon) / (Amount of Raw Seafood) % Mech Salmon = Amount of mechanized salmon divided by the total amount of seafood processed (Amount of Mech. Salmon) / (Amount of Raw Seafood) % Scallop = Amount Of scallop processed divided by the total amount of seafood processed and, Bottomfish = (Amount of Scallop) / (Amount of Raw Seafood) Effluent limitation in Part I.A.I.a. for bottomfish processing Crab Limit Effluent limitation in Part I.A.I.a. for crab processing . ks4 171.' Herring Limit -2- = Effluent limitation in Part I.A.I.a. for herring. processing HB Salmon Limit = Effluent limitation in Part I.A.I.a. for hand - butchered salmon Mech Salmon Limit = Effluent limitation in Part I.A.I.a. for mechanized salmon processing Scallop Limit Effluent limitation in Part I.A.I.a. for scallop processing Two pollutants are limited in the permit, TSS and Oil and Grease. Each pollutant is limited on a monthly average and daily maximum basis. Therefore, by substituting the limitation for each species in the generic equation above, we can generate the following four limitations for Multiple Species processing: TSS - Monthly Average TSS - Daily Maximum Oil and Grease-- Monthly Average Oil and Grease - Daily Maximum TSS Monthly Average Limitation = 1.9(% Bottomfish,) + 3.9(% Crab) + 24(% Herring) + 1.6(% HB Salmon) + 260. Mech Salmon) + 1.4(% Scallop) NOTE: Processing percentages are calculated over the month TSS - Daily Maximum Limitation = 3.10. Bottomfish) + 12(% Crab) + 32(% Herring) + 2.6 O. HB Salmon) + 44.(% Mech. Salmon) + 6.6 (% Scallop) NOTE: Processing percentages are calculated over the sampling day Oil and Grease - Monthly Average Limitation = 0.56(% Bottomfish) + 0.420. Crab) +10(% Herring) + 0.190. HB Salmon) + 11(% Mech Salmon) + 0.24(% Scallop) NOTE: Processing percentages are calculated over the month Oil and Grease - Daily Maximum Limitation = 4.3(% Bottomfish) + 1.3(% Crab) + 27(% Herring) + 0.31(% HB Salmon) + 290. Mech Salmon) + 7.7(% Scallop) NOTE: Processing percentages are calculated over the sampling day These limitations shall be calculated and included in an attachment to the monthly DMRs. it Attachment 2 Example of Calculations to Determine Compliance. With the Permit Limits • These are sample calculations of plant discharge (lbs/1,000 lbs) values which shall be compared to limitations ih Part to determine compliance. Given: Discharges were sampled four days during the month of June 1988. Hand-butchered salmon and bottomfish were processed. The following table provides data for the month of June 1988. Pounds of Raw Product Date Flow, MGD TSS Cont., mg/1 HB Salmon Bottomfish • 6/2/88 0.075 36.8 - - 10,000 6/9/88 0.098. 41.5 - - 23,070 6/16/88 0.127 39.4 6,155 60,000 6/27/88 0.077 ' 47.5 1,210 Daily. Maximum Calculations Step 1: Determine the Daily Maximum discharge for-TSS_foreach day samples • . are collected. . Daily Maximum discharge (in lbs/1000 lbs) equals the measured effluent.flow (mgd), multiplied by the measured effluent • concentration.(mg/1), multiplied by a conversion factor (8,340), and divided by the total amount of raw seafood processed (lbs). Note, that the flow, concentration, and amount of seafood processed -shall - be measured over the same,24-hour period. Daily Maximum = (flow)(concentration)(8,340)/(Daily Production) . Therefore, 6/2/88 Daily Maximum = (0.075 mgd)(36.8 mg/1)(8,340)/(10,000.1bs) 2.30 lbs/1,000 lbs ' 6/9/88. Daily Maximum = (0.098 mgd)(41.5 mg/ )(8,340)/(23,970.1bs) = 1.47 lbs/1,000 lbs 6/16/88 Daily Maximum = (0.127 mgd)(39.4 mg/1)(8,340M66,155 lbs) 0.63 lbs/1,000 lbs • -2- 6/27/88 Daily Maximum = (0.077 mgd)(47.5 mg/1)(8,340)/(1,210 lbs) 25.2 lbs /1,000 lbs Daily Maximum calculations shall be made for each day that samples are collected. Step 2: Determine compliance with applicable daily maximum effluent limitations. - To determine compliance, the above calculated Daily Maximum discharge value shall be compared to the applicable Daily Maximum limit in Part I.A.1.a of the permit. The applicable limitation from Part I.A.1.a. is dependent upon whether only hand- butchered salmon, only bottomfish, or both hand - butchered salmon and bottomfish are processed on the day of sampling. Since only bottomfish is processed on 6/2/88 and 6/9/88, these calculated daily maximum discharge values shall be compared to the daily maximum TSS limitation in Part I.A.1.a., for Alaskan Bottomfish, of 3.1 lbs /1,000 lbs. The 'same type of comparison can be made for the 6/27/88 calculation where only hand - butchered salmon is processed. Because more than one species of seafood is processed on 6/16/88, the calculated daily maximum TSS discharged must be compared to a variable limitation which is derived based upon•a proportion of each seafood species processed. This variable limitation is calculated as follows Limitation = 2.6(% HB Salmon) + 3.1(% Bottomfish) = 2.6(6,155/66,155) + 3.1(60,000/66,155) 3.1 lbs /1,000 lbs This equation is defined in detail in Attachment 1 of the permit. Monthly Average Calculations Step 1: Determine the Average Monthly discharge for TSS (for June 1988). The Average Monthly TSS discharge equals the summation of all Daily Maximum discharge values calculated during the time period covered by the DMR in question (June), divided by the total production.. Therefore, Monthly Average = [(0.075 mgd)(36.8 mg /1) + (0.098 mgd)(41.5 mg /1) + (0.127 mgd)(39.4 mg /1) + (0.077 mgd)(47.5 mg/1)] x (8,340)1(10,000 + 23,070 + 66,155.+ 1,210) 1.3 lbs /1000 lbs Monthly Average calculations shall be made each month. Wig fir T _3_. Step 2: Determine compliance with applicable monthly average effluent limitations. To determine compliance, the above calculated Monthly Average discharge value shall be compared to the applicable. Monthly Average limitation in Part I.A.1.a of the permit. The applicable limitation from Part I.A.1.a. is dependent upon whether only hand-butchered salmon, only bottomfish, or both hand-butchered salmon and bottomfish are processed on any day that 'Samples are collected, during the month in question. For this example, since both hand-butchered salmon and bottomfish are processed during the sampling period in the month of June the above calculated Monthly Average TSS discharge must be compared to a variable limitation which is based upon a proportion of each.seafood species processed. This. variable Monthly Average TSS limitation is calculated as follows: Limitation = NB Salmon) + 1.9(% Bottomfish) 1.6(7,365/100,435)-+ 1.9(93,070/100,435) = 1.9 lbs /1,000 lbs This equation is defined in detail .inAttachment 1 of thepermit. Note: The above example only examines the TSS results. The same calculations apply to Oil &,Grease. Calculations-shall be made during each month and submitted with the DMRs for the month in question. .. •••' .: • AV' #'3 O •Cy /1•i nett 4 41,41 fr • : • 1 • 71:,• 1� * " \;011 as tr• a a 41 X1'4 )• :.i fib♦': •t . 1i d l • :1 d • �� • / M,f� r 0,1, st• •fit N y ••■■ • `„;4. • • .*;K * s y • •j W . : }• Is is ski •O '' 1. (g.' = ; h iZ-. • Its •% 1 i••► OM�ti �'.1 N ! -�.'.t q, is q' p =1 " I .; s �� ``• t,11 r• . • ••• `r ' sr. ' • . r y `s. .ls r' 44 *1 '' • w.t w •g_■4;•./r 0 v• .. ` 61..i1..• . & • . 1.I mik0 » 11 • a w,�i is , K ploy . .:.&•• w 1!! 3= • •.: • j . 1r •• 33 :j•'t ss 11 • .• a1j ► a 11 �...• • •• 440,77'.41-* q• "16144. • • s i,,.• sfw M y as ,AN. a 'yTr• • �` M y "v.* s= 4$ sr 4. `J• 4,4 %.% t• Sett' * 31 as1�f .- • * es. r ;n 141 11 .4 • 14 •.� • .l .c • ±a - • _ v • a 41it • 13 si «"r - 134 • •. �_.• •at . s� i oat a. ma • +e a • N • s• ) w , M r l,. it s j a ti ti .s* K 0.1'45' ea . ♦s r, ss ss g . 811 Cil le Align 0 it al 1 3* IN •••• 't1 � a p a M ._ f O . 0,1 ,,--- be de er 14 0 4...,'U) 64 10. 1''' 36 3 W _•x•''31 :1.' ss ti erdro ::a llxis Setter is ° ii re�a*d to th8 transfer of I p trt rent of tie Permit No. 74 -307 designated Kodiak Harbor 58 3.ssued to Martin 's Kin; t also.; Inc., on ':8 November 1974. authorizing : cs nstruction of a. 70 dock extension. Your agreement to conly:with all terms and c editions of the _referenced permit has been received and included. in the permit file. Effective_ tt date, the : permit is hereby transferred to Smith co Potter /dp/27042 it DUPLICATE LOST :III :TRANSMITTAL DEPARTMENT: OF THE ARMY PERMIT TRANSFERED TO Swiure Fisheries ON : JUL 2 0.-4,977' . Application No. 74 -236 =Name of Applicant MARTIN'S KING CRAB, INC. Effective Date 8 NOV 74 Expiration Date (If applicable) N/A . - File No. Kodiak Harbor 58 Referring to permit to: itten request. dated 8 August 1974' (x) Perform work in -or affecting navigable waters of the United: States, upon. the-recommendation of the Chief of Eo i'eers,. pir-suan.t to Section 10.of the Rivers :and Harbors Act: of March 3, .1899(33 U.S.C.... 401);- (_. )" Discharge dredged or fill material into navigable waters upon the issuance of a permit from the. Secretary of the Army acting through the Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 404 of the Federal Water Pol- lution Control Act (86 Stat. 816, P.L. 92-500); ) Transport" dredged material for the purpose of dumping it into ocean waters upon the issuance of a permit from the Secretary of. the. Army acting through the Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 103 of the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (86 Stat. 1052, P.L. 92 -532); .Martin's King Crab. _Inc. PO Box 2547 Kodiak. Alaska 99615 (Here insert the full name and address of the permittee) is hereby authorized by the Secretary of the Army to construct a•.70 foot dock extension (Here describe the proposed structure or activity, and its intended use. In the case of an application for a fill permit, describe the structures,: ENG FOR1" 1721 (TEMP) I MAY 74. if any, proposed to be erected on the fill. In the case of an'applica- tion for the discharge of dredged or fill material into navigable waters or the transportation for discharge in ocean waters of dredged material, describe the type and quantity of material to be discharged.) in Kodiak Harbor (Here to be named the ocean, river, harbor or waterway concerned.`, at -approximately 600 feet east of the Kodiak Small Boat Harbor (Here to be named the nearest well -known locality preferably a town ' or city --- and the distance ii; mils:; and tena2a from some definite poinc: in the same, stating whether above or below or giving direction by .points of compass.) :. in "accordance with the plans and drawings attached' hereto which are in- corporated in and made a part of this permit (on drawings: give file number or other definite identification marks.) Subject to the follow- ing conditions: I. GENERAL CONDITIONS: a. That all activities identified and authorized herein shall be con- sistent with the terms and conditions of this permit; and that any activ- ities not specifically identified and authorized herein shall constitute a violation of the terms and conditions of this permit which may result ii t-he modification, suspension o== revocatio = of this permit, in whole or in part, as set forth more specifically in General Conditions j or k here- to, and in the institution of such legal proceedings as the United States Government may consider'appropriate, whether or not this permit has been previously modified, suspended or revoked in whole-or in part. . b. That all activities authorized herein shall, if they involve a discharge or deposit into navigable waters or ocean waters, be at all times consistent with 'applicable water quality standards, effluent lim- itations and standards of performance, prohibitions, and pretreatment- -. standards established pursuant to Sections 301, 302, 306 and 307 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (P.L. 92 -500; 86 Stat. 816) or pursuant to applicable State and local law. "c. That when the activity authorized herein involves a discharge or deposit of dredged or fill material into navigable waters, the authorized activity shall, if applicable water quality standards are revised or modified during the term of this permit, be modified, if necessary,: to conform with such revised or modified water quality standards with- in 6 months of the effective date of any revision or modification of water quality standards, or as directed by an implementation plan.con- tained in such revised or modified standards, or within such longer period of-time as the District Engineer, in consultation with the Re- gional Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, may de- termine to be reasonable under the circnrn tances. d..- That the permittee agrees to make every reasonable effort , to` prosecute the construction or work authorized herein in a manner.: so`.. as to minimize any adverse impact of the construction or work on fish wildlife and natural environmental values. That the permittee agrees that it will .prosecute the construc- tion or work authorized herein in a manner:so as to minimize any-de-7, gradation of. water`quality. f. That the permittee shall permit the District Engineer or his authorized representative(s) or designee(s) to make periodic inspec- tions at any deemed necessary in order to assure that the activ- ity being performed under authority of this permit is in accordance with the terms and conditions prescribed herein.' g. That the permittee shall maintain the structure or work auth -. orized herein.in good condition and in accordance with the plans and drawings attached hereto. h. That this permit does not convey any property rights either in real estate or material, or any exclusive privileges; and that it does . not authorize any injury to property or invasion-of rights or any in- fringement of Federal, State, or local laws or regulations, nor does it obviate the .req:i rement to-obtain State or local assent required -by -- law for the activity authorized herein. i. That this permit does not authorize the interference with any existing or proposed Federal project and that the permittee shall not be entitled to compensation for damage or injury to. the structures or work authorized herein which may be caused by or result from existing or future operations undertaken by the United States in the public in- terest. .j.. That this permit may be summarily suspended, in whole or in part, upon a finding by the District Engineer that immediate suspension of the -. activity authorized herein would be in the general public interest.. Such suspension shall be effective upon receipt by the permittee of a written notice thereof which shall indicate (1) the extent of the. suspension, (2) the reasons for this action, and (3) any corrective or preventative measures to be taken by the permittee which are deemed necessary by the District Engineer to abate imminent hazards to the general public in- terest. The permittee shall take immediate action to comply with the provisions of this notice. Within ten days following receipt of this notice of suspension, the permittee may request a hearing in order to present information relevant to a decision as to whether his permit should be reinstated, modified or revoked. If a hearing is requested, it shall be conducted pursuant to procedures prescribed by the Chief of Engineers. After completion of the hearing, or within a reasonable time after issuance of the suspension notice to the permittee if no ., hearing is-requested, the permit will either be reinstated, modified- or revoked. - k. .That this permit may be either modified, suspended or revoked in ' whole or in .part if the Secretary of the Army or his authorized repre-- sentative determines that there has been a violation of any of the terms or conditions of this permit or that such action would otherwise be in the public interest. Any such modification, suspension, or revocation shall become effective 30 days after receipt by the permittee of written' notice of such action which shall specify the facts or conduct warrant- ing same unless (1) within the 30-day period the permittee is able to satisfactorily demonstrate that (a) the elleged violation of the terms and the conditions of this permit did not, in fact, occur or (b) the alleged violation was accidental, and the permittee has been operating in compliance with the terms and conditions of the permit and is able to provide satisfactory assurances that future operations shall be in full compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit; or (2) 7177 within the aforesaid 30-day period, the permittee requests that a pub- lic hearing be held to present oral and written evidence concerning the proposed modification, suspension or revocation. The conduct of this ' hearing and the procedures for making a final decision either to modify, suspend or revoke this permit in whole or in part shall be pursuant to procedures prescribed by the-Chief of Er, ineers. 1. That in issuing this permit, the Government has relied on the information and data which the permittee has provided in connection with his permit application. If, subsequent to the issuance of this permit, .such information and data prove to be false, incomplete or inaccurate; this permit may be modified, suspended or revoked, in whole or in part, and/or the Government may, in addition, institute appropriate legal pro- ceeaings. m. That any modification, suspension, or revocation of this permit shall not be the basis for any claim for damages against the United States. • ..... . • ....... -n. That the permittee shall notify the District Engineer at what time the activity authorized herein will be commenced, as fax in advance of the time of commencement as the District Engineer may specify, and of any suspension of work, if for a period of more than one week, resumption of work and its completion. ..... o. That if the activity authorized herein is not started on or before day of , 19 -- , (one year from.the date of issuance of this permit unless otherwise specified) and is not completed on or before day of --- 19-- , (three years from the date of issuance of this permit unless oth- erwise specified) this permit, if not previously revoked or specifically extended, shall automatically expire. p. That no attempt shall be made by the permittee to prevent the full and free use by the public of all navigable waters at or adjacent to the activity authorized by this permit. q. That if the display of lights and signals on any structure or 'work authorized herein is not otherwise provided for by law, such lights and signals as may be prescribed by the United States Coast Guard shall be in- stalled and maintained by and at the expense of the permittee.. . .. .. ... r. That this permit does not authorize or approve the construction of particular structures, the authorization or approval of which may require authorization by the Congress or other agencies oi tne Federal Government. s. That if and when the permittee desires to abandon the activity authorized herein, unless such abandonment is part of a transfer proced- ure by which the permittee is transferring his interests herein to a third party pursuant to General Condition v hereof, he must restore the • area to a condition satisfactory to the District Engineer. t. That if the recording of this permit is possible under applicable • State or local law, the permittee shall take such action as may be nec- • essary to record this permit with the Register of Deeds or other appro- priate official charged with the responsibility for maintaining records of title to and interests in real property. u. That there shall be no unreasonable interference with navigation by the existence or. dse of thu-activity authorized herein. --- v. .That this permit may not be transferred to a third party without prior written notice to the District Engineer, either by the transferee's written agreement to comply with all terns and conditions of this permit • or by the transferee subscribing to this remit in the space provided • below and thereby agreeing to comply with all terms and conditions of this permit. In addition, if the permittee transfers the interests auth- orized herein by conveyance of realty, the deed shall reference this permit and the terms and conditions specified herein and this nerramal.. e.recor e t e register of Deeds or other aD- propriate officia 5 .0" 1.•■••••,...-P•tt. II. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: w. STRUCTURES FOR SMALL BOATS: That permittee hereby recognizes the possibility that the structure permitted herein may be subject todamage by wave wash from passing vessels. The issuance of this permit does not relieve the permittee from taking all proper steps to insure the integrity of the structure permitted herein and the safety of boats moored thereto from damage by wave wash and the permittee shall not hold the United States liable for any such damage. x. ERECTION OF STRUCTURE IN OR OVER NAVIGABLE WATERS: That the permittee, upon. receipt of a notice of revocation of this permit or upon its expiration before completion of the authorized structure or work, shall, without expense to the United States and in such time and manner as the Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative may direct, restore the wz../.e.rway, to its former r:onclitions. If the permittee fails to comply with the.direction of the Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative, the Secretary or his designee may restore the waterway to its former condition, by contract or otherwise, and recover the cost thereof from the permittee.. y. That the permittee shall advise the District Engineer of the penetration achieved in accomplishing the authorized work. This permit shall become effective on the date of the District Engi- neer's signature.' Permittee hereby accepts and agrees to comply with the terms and conditions of this permit. - Date By authority of the Secretary of the Army: • 8 NOV 1374 - Date CHARLES A. DEBELIUS Colone , Corps of Eng):neers District Engine r Transieree•hereby agrees-.o comply with the terms and conditions of this permit. W�rT:..YE 4144 Date -1-1 VAL M. H. H.W. 6. MH.W 7 Isel• 1- LW. D.0 L'ovie.54 / id (es+ ) -4. p Thi* cia-Fro wiusd ad ju5ted 44)e 4.4 La-d gpub.sicience. a+i-hide 57. 47' I Z" 1-0.15-1-1.0,4a. 152' 13- c.?1-Y OA Iij 14 VICINITY , MAP •eq•esm ctart Sad; is 5ctile. ir -ect. 90e, 1.07 43a, 49 sfao ∈ ARV 17; N.: as 47' - ,, • .fre A.4, ..., 4.17 Pent ,, • 011 1r ••.4. •• ........ ..... • 3.. Tract Tr !1 dc 14 1..1 —1 1 t(li zz ALA 5 IAA 1144 14.--1315 KOP1A 4 , 'efr' 1. - Y 01 . 4 4 II" 9.X., E 1 i. '-` . . If X 11 TitifiC.T tC11 0 ill C14 tO r kn N-Z7 --- 1.-- HA-fle,e7 t—INI AAEr• DI t.46/ (KOcticak Harbor CITY e7P- 471A,. Pax 139/ /4- opiA sr- ,AL&4 OP/AZ H4Z,570g. ca le. EDEEf lex. O .1.0 p Keviii,i,t-c EL.ft: A.A.5,4st 8, 19 74 i. • ;===::: ....... • noilla.•••••••••••••04.1/1•• ••• ...... ........ frice,t.on, p 10 ma.Nct m u nel VAX' E"' ric-Ft• putodmroe.G. (p4t vAE.tes TI 0 1.1 vi?„, IC'. c>c-a le •ri "'Fec MA? E Z-1.41-5 • . • i•?.4e1, v 11_5-6 - V-ILL.s17 Ft4p.rriz— LOC-6a- '1712-1JC. •rt .7 '1:1• 'to% 11G12.-a-r" tr3S-CdV. , -77 • • • r. I :.n- • to.0 Ter Vecir- b.‘ PIHI-tV4 49.0 tALL),41 ......... .1,■•■•■•■••••■ NO. -E ...4.-.1, 4...) .....r. 0. , - '''0 .0 .. "..., IT ..: • A :4 ...if 4.4 • . ' ,.. , .%r :.,...0. 4 t•.. ....,•.- • 1 x-,.-.. % • ,7.......•.•-..,•-• ,.,...-_-,,,,,.. el.* , •,-....,,c.‹......• IOW