Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
USS 2537B, BLK 2 TR 16A - ZCP
FU ER OATYARD FREEZER PLANT CANNERY (OBS`) STORAGE PARKIN�| FUEL TANKS (KEA) POWER PLANT *(KE/\) OFFICE (KEA) NEAR {S LAND HR\DGE .11w. 060166.. ALASKA u.. .r.v., 000E 010019 006 1991 cloaalricxtlon: 9.6 9ropo *94 ton9truct1an Typal Typo 0.1 0007, 6pxinkixnd. 210000010 Aron Calculation. Sac 606 401, sprinkler 006 STOAT 107619 090 60504, 190 6107tea 00000 101009 090911ng 91,99 plo:r (r001prinr) 92op096d Addition Existing 090900Y00 ta19 ary 00600 TOTAL. 16,000 0.9. 21.6 19,000 0.9. 16,000 S.T. 79,000 S.Y. 14,039 6.9. 6,160 9.9, 10,9906.9. 19.010 , 9,9. 11,100 9.9. 'OLD" E 0J 2.47oit 8u,' 966 ,.o 614 Y 244.2/6-014.46 MEIN. 0264STRUCTICIAI SW,AigLERE-'), e.-4 1Z. . TI D-E LA1 D TRACT -28 (27,45s-Apr) 27,M9gsaA.p7) 0 (172E1 Rio- - /e " r 17 cD5-EC-r tNt=aoRrn�-ct ©t.1: n?-?-.01,40C4 T'iPE: 11Crlpl.I -r St94.1c, 7(�! ►i~ 96'46" rc-h $u' Z J A/ 5.9‘b40'45 /83.27' ,V .A R /sLs /a CH /vi. tE '0441.1Et2. li.('7s42/J,417a l4e., .4FFGRS cP 400 * /kc. Pa 130)c 2997 ©D� , ,4LASk-.4 996/6 LE*'. DESCR3P-no4-1 'ra(s1tu6 Buu..D1u6 E12J o/Donl5. ankr,R pROpEZI ( Ukaa PL ©T )PLAN �...2q ApV9l l ..am /N7r-0 tuxlai. SFo5CS- 4A40- A -1 09/23/1997 10:23 9074864481 FAX COVER PAGE FAX NUMBER: 97486-9378 ANNE & V TO KALCIC PAGE Ul ANNE KALCIC 012 MISSION ROAD P. O. BOX 2085 KODIAK, ALASKA 98415 FAX 907' 4864481 HOME: 907 486-5824 PAGE 1 OF 3 TO: Mrs. Linda Rued Community Devilopatent Kodiak Island Borough Dear Undo, To ibitow Is copy of a letter 1 11011t this !wonting to the ADEC. Thattka, Anne CID/ . 1 .1.77 i 1G: L.j ya (41:1b4481 Alaska Department of Em+iro Conservation 555 Cordova Street Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Attention: Mr. Mike Ostasz Fax 269 -7510 tal ANNE & VITO KALCIC PAGE 02 September 22, 1997 Anne Kaicic P. Box 2085 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 907 486 -5824 Faxsimile; 907 486 -4481 Re: Improper Storage of Corrosives and Rancid Fish Oil by Irternational Seafoods of Alaska, Tagura Road, Kodiak, Ak On August 8, 1997, International Seafoods of Alaska moved pallets of 55 gallon drums of rancid fish oil from their Shelikof Avenue plant to a storage area on Tagura Road, across fivaus their Eagle Bunkhouse. At 8:30PM that evening, 1 drove down Ito my office to lock up for the evening, and passed their unloading operation just after the r had dumped 4-55 gallon drums of rancid fish oil on the edge of their It and on the pub roadway When I returned from locking my office, a few minutes later, the forklift continuing to unload, driving through about 3 inches of fish oil. I stopped and asked when they were going to clean up the mess, and was told by the driver to mind my own busineas, that fish oil was biodegradable and that there was nothing 1 could do about it. He laughed and said that I was lucky that he had nut not dumped one of the 6 peileitr of phosphoric acid; that then I. would have something to worry about. When 1 got home, I called the police department to report the spill and was told by the dispatcher that file had already had four other calls regarding the spill and she was unable to locate anyone! tt the ISA plant. Since ISA had leased another lot from an entity I was Trustee for in the post, I called David Rogers, General Manager of-IS,A at home and asked if he could get the mesa . cleaned up. He informed me that he had just returned from a trip to South Arneri4 and was very tired, but that he would see about what could be done about the spill. 1*ie next day I left a message for the City Manager on his answering machine and spoke to d retired employee of the DEC here in town about who to contact the following Mond night it rained, spreading the rancid fish oil across the street and down the road. following Sunday afternoon, two employees of International Seafoods showed ug 1ith firedose and washed the rancid fish oil across the street into the parldng lot at the Bunkhouse, On Monday morning, 1 spoke with the City Manager, gill Jones, whet said that he would look into the spill right away, and to Mrs. Linda Freed, at the Kod k Island Borough. who suggested that I call the ADEC in Soldotna. 09/23/1997 10:25 9074864481 Tom, ANNE & VITQ KALCIC PAGE 01 For the next few weeks, ISA continued to bring additional pallets of rancid fish oil td the lot on pallets of 4 containers each until the lot was full, approximately 120 barrels. Now it is a month and a half later and today the road has a new sheen of fish oil. For the past three days it has rained a great amount here in Kodiak„ three inches in one nigh. Now the rancid fish oil is running out of the barrels, onto the ground and onto the street. I would like to request that these barrels be removed immediately, and taken to the Kodiak Landfill for proper disposal, as the corrosive materials in some of the barrels!pose a health hazard to the entire community, as well as to those of us who live and work in the area. The fish oil on the street is being tracked into adjoining offices by passersby and it stinks. Vehicles are spreading the oil on the road in both directions awn the spill on Tagura Road, The mud puddles from the rain all have a sheen of this disgusting smelling stuff. I will be out of town until the 10th of October, but I would really like to see this ongoing spill remedied immediately, as it is detrimental to the health and safety of all persons who use Tagura Road, including the residents of the ISA bunkhouse and the adjoining homeowners, Thank you for taking the time to consider my complaint, Sinter , 1,7M/,e /1f, Anne Kaleic cc: Mrs. Linda Freed, Kodiak Isi Boro Mr. Bill Jones, City of Kndigk H . \ • t • f; \ • . DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION SOUTHCENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE 3601 C ST., SUITE 1350 ANCHORAGE, AK 99503 International Seafoods of Alaska Attn: David Rogers P.O. Box 2997 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Dear Mr. Rogers: WALTER J. NICKEL, GOVERNOR CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED P 762 750 580 August 20, 1993 563-6529 AUG 3 0 1 COMUJTY DEVLLOPMENT DEPARTMENT RE: Certification of Reasonable Assurance Modification Kodiak Harbor 48 State I.D. No. AK9307-01AA This letter is to amend the subject certification originally issued May 26, 1987, to include the following: 1. Approximately 1,000 cubic yards of material will be dredged from the area in front of the net loft and used as backfill for the new bulkhead. 2. The existing wooden bulkhead and dock located in front of the bunkhouse will be removed. 3. A 200' long steel bulkhead and adjoining steel pile supported concrete decked dock will be constructed in front of the existing bunk house. This modification carries the following stipulations: 1. The portions of the existing wooden bulkhead and dock treated with creosote that are to be removed, shall be disposed of in a Department of Environmental Conservation approved disposal site. They are not to be disposed of via burning. 2. The backfill shall not contain trash, refuse, organic matter or any substance which is defined as solid waste under State Regulation 18 AAC 60 (Solid Waste Management Regulation). 3. Blasting shall be scheduled at a time when few birds or marine mammals are in the vicinity. LETTER KODIAK HARBOR 58 page 2 DAVID ROGERS CRAM August 20, 1993 4. Prior to each blast, the area shall be patrolled by boat or on the shore, and devices/techniques and authorized personnel from USFW and/or NMFS shall be used to move birds and marine mammals away from the project area, as necessary. 5. For blasting within the Near Island channel, employing either the dobying or drill and blast technique, the size of individual explosive charges shall be minimized to reduce resultant hydrostatic pressure waves. Maximum allowable shock wave impulse strengths at specific distances from the blast -site- shall -b-e-errip-roy-e-d. An upper limit of 0.69 bar per millisecond (10 pounds per square inch per millisecond) as measured at the midwater column depth 150 meters from the charge shall be employed. 6. After each detonation, a visual survey shall be made of the Near Island channel within 400 meters of the blast and all dead fish and wildlife removed from the water to prevent attraction of foraging fish and wildlife to the area. Animal carcasses shall be disposed of at an upland location and in accordance with any state or federal requirements for such disposal. TR\ji [SCRO,wqm]KH48 Sincerely, Pine-Janice Adair Regional Administrator cc: Carmen Denny, DGC Bill Adadie, Corps of Engineers Elaine Pistoresi, ADEC Anchorage Don McKay, ADFG Habitat Anchorage Larry Bullis, DNR\DOL Linda Freed, Kodiak Island Boro Planning Dept. Bill Rieth, ADEC Kodiak Area Office OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET DIVISION OF GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION SOUTHCENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE - 3601 "C" STREET, SUITE 370 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503-5930 PH: (907) 561-6131/FAX: (907) 561-6134 01-A35LH 1:1 CENTRAL OFFICE P.O. BOX 110030 JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811-0300 PH: (907) 465-3562/FAX: (907) 465-3075 Mr, David Rogers International Seafoods of Alaska PO BOX 2997 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 . Dear Mr. Rogers: WALTER J. NICKEL, GOVERNOR PIPELINE COORDINATORS OFFICE 411 WEST 4TH AVENUE, SUITE 2C ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99501-2343 PH: (907) 278-8594/FAX: (907) 272-0690 August 19, 1993 Subject: CONCLUSIVE CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION Kodiak Harbor 48 STATE ID NUMBER AK9307-01AA f E fl AUG 2 3 1993 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT The Division of Governmental Coordination (DGC) has completed coordinating the state's review of your project for consistency with the Alaska Coastal Management Program (ACM?). On August 11, 1993 you were issued a proposed consistency finding for your project. The project identifies additional activities which modify the existing Kodiak Harbor 48 permit, found consistent under AK900306-11A. It includes removal of the existing bulkhead and dock found in the Near Islarid channel east of the International Seafoods of Alaska (ISA) bunk house and warehouse, construction of a steel bulkhead and dredging 1000 cubic yards in front of the net loft to facilitate vessel draft. The existing wood bulkhead and dock will be removed before fill placement. The steel bulkhead will be open cell, and faced with a 20 foot wide, steel pile supported concrete decked dock measuring 250 feet long. It will be installed and backfilled with approximately 7000 cubic yards of material. 1000 cubic yards of backfill material will come from the dredging to a depth of -20 feet at mean lower low water in front of the net loft. The proposed steel bulkhead will be in place prior to backfill placement. Plans indicate the bulkhead will be in excess of 380 feet long and would extend from just north of the cannery building to the warehouse. Explosives may be used as part of the construction/dredging activity, however, the blasting method to be used is not identified. Upon authorization of the proposed work, the applicant proposes to relinquish authorization to construct approximately 200 feet of steel bulkhead, 200 feet of 2 pile supported dock, and the dredging of 1500 cubic yards of material from the far west end of international Seafoods of Alaska's property. This conclusive consistency determination, developed under 6 AAC 50, applies to the following state and federal authorizations: Department of Environmental Conservation - Certificate of Reasonable Assurance US Army Corps of Engineers - Section 404 Permit. . _ Based on the review of your project by the Alaska Departments of Natural Resources, Environmental Conservation, and Fish and Game, and the Kodiak Island Borough Coastal District, the state concurs with your certification the project is consistent with the ACMP, provided the following conditions are met: 1) The portions of the existing wooden bulkhead and dock treated with creosote that are to be removed shall be disposed of in a disposal site approved by Department of Environmental Conservation. RATIONALE: Burning of creosoted wood produces black smoke and liberates toxic substances to the atmosphere. 2) Backfill shall not contain trash, refuse, organic matter or any substance which is defined as solid waste under state regulation 18 AAC 60 (Waste Management. Regulation). RATIONALE: This stipulation inhibits contamination of land and water from runoff and erosion by controlling composition of backfill, which can receive debris in violation of state law, during construction project debris removal. These stipulations are necessary pursuant to 6 AAC 50.140 Air, Land and Water Quality. 3) Blasting shall be scheduled at a time when few birds or marine mammals are in the vicinity. 4) Prior to each blast, the area shall be patrolled by boat or on the shore, and devices/techniques and authorized personnel from USFW and/or NMFS shall be used to move birds and marine mammals away from the project area, as necessary. 5) For blasting within the Near Island channel, employing either the dobying or drill and blast technique, the size of individual explosive charges shall be minimized to reduce resultant hydrostatic pressure waves. Maximum allowable shock wave impulse strengths at specific distances from the blast site 3 shall be employed. An upper limit of 0.69 bar per millisecond (10 pounds per square inch per millisecond) as measured at the midwater column depth 150 meters from the charge shall be employed. 6) After each detonation, a visual survey shall be made of the Near Island channel within 400 meters of the blast and all dead fish and wildlife removed from the water to prevent attraction of foraging fish and wildlife to the area. Animal carcasses shall be disposed of at an upland location and in accordance with any state or federal requirements for such disposal. RATIONALE: The above conditions provide adequate protection of sea lions found in the area pursuant to 6 AAC 80.130 Habitat. These stipulations will appear as conditions on the Certificate of Reasonable Assurance issued by the Department of Environmental Conservation. This conclusive consistency determination represents a consensus reached between you as the project applicant and the reviewing agencies listed above, as provided for under 6 AAC 50.070(k). As also provided under 15 CFR 930.64(c), federal authorization of your project will be made with the full understanding that your original project proposal has been modified subject to the conditions described above. If changes to the approved project are proposed prior-to or during its siting, construction, or operation, you are required to contact this office immediately to determine if further review and approval of the revised project is necessary. The state reserves the right to enforce compliance with this conclusive consistency determination if the project is changed in any significant way, or if the actual use differs from the approved use contained in the project description. If appropriate, the state may amend the state approvals listed in this conclusive consistency determination. By a copy of this letter we are informing the reviewing agencies of our determination. Other Concerns /Advisories: If cultural or paleontological resources are discovered as a result of this activity, we request that work which would disturb such resources be stopped and the State Historic Preservation Office be contacted immediately (762- 2626). Please be advised that although the state has found your project consistent with the ACMP, based on your project description and any stipulations contained herein, you are still required to meet all applicable State and federal laws and regulations. Your consistency determination may include reference to specific laws and regulations, but this in no way precludes your responsibility to comply with other applicable laws and regulations. If you have questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 561-6131. Sin e ely, Carmen Dfliy Project ew Coordinator cc: Kodiak Island Borough Distribution List William Abadie, COE KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH DISTRIBUTION LIST August 18, 1993 Mr. Tim Smith, State Historic Preservation Office, Department of Natural Resources, Anchorage Mr. Larry Bullis, ACMP Liaison, Department of Natural Resources, Anchorage Ms. Carol Jo Sanner, Permits Officer, Dept. of Transportation & Public Facilities, Anchorage Mr. Donald 0. McKay, Habitat Division, Department of Fish & Game, Anchorage Ms. Elaine Pistoresi, PIC, Department of Environmental Conservation, Anchorage Ms. Linda L. Freed, Kodiak Island Borough, Kodiak Mr. U.L. Gross, Koniag, Inc., Anchorage Mr. Jerome Selby, Borough Mayor, Kodiak Island Borough, Kodiak Mr. Kelly Simeonoff, Jr., President, Kodiak Area Native Association, Kodiak Ms. Claire Holland, District Ranger, State Parks, Dept. of Nat. Resources, Kodiak OFFICE OF TILE GOVERNOR OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET DIVISION OF GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ijaSOUTHCENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE 3601 "C" STREET, SUITE 370 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503-5930 PH: (907) 561-6131/FAX: (907) 561-6134 Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested 0 CENTRAL OFFICE P.O. BOX 110030 JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811-0300 PH: (907) 465-35671FAX: (907) 465-3075 Mr. David Rogers International Seafoods of Alaska PO BOX 2997 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Dear Mr. Rogers: August 11, SUBJECT: PROPOSED CONSISTENCY FINDING Kodiak Harbor 48 STATE ID NUMBER AK9307-01AA WALTER J. HICKEL, GOVERNOR 0 PIPELINE COORDINATOR'S OFFICE 411 WEST 4TH AVENUE, SUITE 2C ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99501-2343 PH: (907) 278-8594/FAX: (907) 272-0690 1993 P 479 044 760 LAU& 1 3 1993 The Division of Governmental Coordination (DGC) is coordinating the state's review of your project for consistency with the Alaska Coastal Management Program (ACMP) and has developed this proposed consistency finding based on reviewers' comments. The project identifies additional activities which modify the existing Kodiak Harbor 48 permit, found consistent under AK900306-11A. It includes removal of the existing bulkhead and dock found in the Near Island channel east of the International Seafoods of Alaska (ISA) bunk house and warehouse, construction of a steel bulkhead and dredging 1000 cubic yards in front of the net loft to facilitate vessel draft. The existing wood bulkhead and dock will be removed before fill placement. The steel bulkhead will be open cell, and faced with a 20 foot wide, steel pile supported concrete decked dock measuring 250 feet long. It will be installed and backfilled with approximately 7000 cubic yards of material. 1000 cubic yards of backfill material will come from the dredging to a depth of -20 feet at mean lower low water in front of the net loft. The proposed steel bulkhead will be in place prior to backfill placement. Plans indicate the bulkhead will be in excess of 380 feet long and would extend from just north of the cannery building to the warehouse. Explosives may be used as part of the construction/dredging activity, however, the blasting method to be used is not identified. Upon authorization of the proposed work, the applicant proposes to relinquish authorization to construct approximately 200 feet of steel bulkhead, 200 feet of pile supported dock, and the dredging of 1500 cubic yards of material from the far west end of International Seafoods of Alsaka's property. oNDEvappkiENI EPARTMENT currently This proposed consistency finding, developed under 6 AAC 50, applies to the following state and federal authorizations: Department of Environmental Conservation - Certificate of Reasonable Assurance US Army Corps of Engineers - Section 404 Permit. Based on the review of your project by the Alaska Departments of Natural Resources, Environmental Conservation, and Fish and Game, and the Kodiak Island Borough coastal district, the state concurs with your certification that the project is consistent with the ACMP provided the following conditions are met: 1) The portions of the existing wooden bulkhead and dock treated with creosote that are to be removed shall be disposed of in a disposal site approved by Department of Environmental Conservation. RATIONALE: Burning of creosoted wood produces black smoke and liberates toxic substances to the atmosphere. 2) Backfill shall not contain trash, refuse, organic matter or any substance which is defined as solid waste under state regulation 18 AAC 60 (Waste Management Regulation). RATIONALE: This stipulation inhibits contamination of land and water from runoff and erosion by controlling composition of backfill, which can receive debris in violation of state law, during construction project debris removal. These stipulations are necessary pursuant to 6 AAC 50.140 Air, Land and Water Quality. 3) Blasting shall be scheduled at a time when few birds or marine mammals are in the vicinity. 4) Prior to each blast, the area shall be patrolled by boat or _on the shore, arid-..devices/techniques and authorized personnel from USFW and/or. NMFS shall be used to move-birds and marine mammals away from the project area, as necessary. 5) For blasting within the Near Island channel, employing either the dobying or drill and blast technique, the size of individual explosive charges shall be minimized to reduce resultant hydrostatic pressure waves. Maximum allowable shock wave impulse strengths at specific distances from the blast site shall be employed. An upper limit of 0.69 bar per millisecond (10 pounds pex square inch per millisecond) as measured at the midwater column depth 150 meters from the charge shall be employed. 6) After each detonation, a visual survey shall be made of the Near Island channel within 400 meters of the blast and all dead fish and wildlife removed from the water to prevent attraction of foraging fish and wildlife to the area. Animal carcasses shall be disposed of at an upland location and in accordance with any state or federal requirements for such disposal. RATIONALE: The above conditions provide adequate protection of sea lions found in the area pursuant to 6 AAC 80.130 Habitat. Copies of the pertinent ACMP Standards are enclosed. These stipulations will appear as conditions on the Certificate of Reasonable Assurance issued by the Department of Environmental Conservation. Please contact-me within five days of your receipt of this proposed finding to indicate whether or not you concur with the project design in paragraph one and this finding. If you are not prepared to concur within the five-day period, you may either: (a) request an extension of the review schedule, if you need more time to consider this finding, or (b) request that the state reconsider this finding, by submitting a written statement requesting "elevation" of the finding, describing your concerns, and proposing an alternative consistency finding. This alternative finding must demonstrate how your project is consistent with the referenced standards of the ACMP and district policies without the stipulations included in this proposed finding. If I do not receive your request for extension or an elevation statement from you, or any other reviewing party with elevation rights as per 6 AAC 50.070(j), within five days of receipt of this letter, this proposed finding will be issued as a final conclusive consistency determination. By copy of this letter, we are informing the reviewing agencies of our proposed finding. Advisories Please be advised that although the state has found your project consistent with the ACMP, based on your project description and any stipulations contained herein, you are still required to meet all applicable state and federal laws and regulations. Your consistency determination may include reference to specific laws and regulations, but this in no way precludes your responsibility to comply with other applicable laws and regulations. Department of Fish and Game indicates a difference between bulkhead dimensions as public noticed by the Corps of Engineers and those indicated on diagrams included in the Corps application. The project description indicates the scope of a project reviewed for consistency under 6 AAC 50. It is important any confusion regarding this be clarified by contacting Bill Abadie, 753-2712 and/or Wayne Dolezal, 267-2284. If you have questions regarding this process, please contact me at 561-6131. Sin -rely, C=en Project Enclosure cc: Kodiak Island Borough Distribution List William Abadie, COE w Coordinator KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH DISTRIBUTION LIST August 11, 993 Mr, Tim Smith, State Historic Preservation Office, Department of Natural Resources, Anchorage Mr. Larry Bullis, ACMP Liaison, Department of Natural Resources, Anchorage Ms. Carol Jo Sanner, Permits Officer, Dept. of Transportation & Public Facilities, Anchorage Mr, Donald 0. McKay, Habitat Division, Department of Fish & Game, Anchorage Ms, Elaine Pistoresi, PIC, Department of Environmental Conservation, Anchorage Ms. Linda L. Freed, Kodiak Island Borough, Kodiak Mr. U.L. Gross, Koniag, Inc., Anchorage Mr, Jerome Selby, Borough Mayor, Kodiak Island Borough, Kodiak Mr. Kelly Simeonoff, Jr., President, Kodiak Area Native Association, Kodiak Ms. Claire Holland, District Ranger, State Parks, Dept. of Nat. Resources, Kodiak Kodiak IslandBorough. 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 -6340 ° PHONE (907) 486 -5736 August 4, 1993 .-S VIA FAX 5615fi 134 Carmen Denny Project Review Coordinator OMB -DGC Southcentral Regional Office 3601 C Street, Suite 370 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 -5930 RE: Kodiak Harbor 48 (International Seafoods Dock Expansion City Tideland Tract 16B) SID AK930701 - O1AA Dear Ms. Denny: The Kodiak Island Borough has had an opportunity to review the dock project referenced above. The purpose of the project is to develop a deep water dock and related facilities in conjunction with the development of a cold storage facility. Based on a review of the Industrial Development policies contained in the KIBCMP we recommend that the proposed project be found consistent with the KIBCMP and the ACMP. If you have any questions about these comments or require further information, please call me at 486 -9360. Sincerely, v/ Linda L. Freed, Director Community Development Department cc: B. Abadie, COE L. Bullis, ADNR W. Dolezal, ADFG D. Rogers, ISA T. Rumfelt, ADEC OFFICE OF 1HE GOVERNOR OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET DIVISION OF GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION 0 CENTRAL OFFICE P.O. BOX 110030 JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811-0300 PH: (907) 465-3562/FAX: (907) 465-3075 SOUTHCENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE 3601 "C" STREET, SUITE 370 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503-5930 PH: (907) 561-6131/FAX: (907) 561-6134 01-A35LH July 1, 1993 Mr. David Rogers International Seafoods of Alaska PO BOX 2997 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Dear Mr. Rogers: SUBJECT: Kodiak Harbor 48 AK930701-01AA START REVIEW WALTER J. HICKEL, GOVERNOR 0 PIPELINE COORDINATOR'S OFFICE 411 WEST 4TH AVENUE, SUITE 2C ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99501-2343 PH: (907) 278-8594/FAX: (907) 272-0690 The Division of Governmental Coordination has received the coastal project questionnaire, applications, and supporting information you submitted for our project consistency review. Included in the packet was your consistency certification submitted for our concurrence under Section 307(c)(3)(A) of the Federal Coastal Zone Management Act as per 15 CFR 930, Subpart D. The enclosed project information sheet includes a State ID Number AK930701-01AA. Please use this number in any future reference to the project. Appropriate materials have been distributed to participants in the Alaska Coastal Management Program for their review and comments. Reviewer milestones and the associated permits are also indicated on the enclosed sheet. You may want to contact. Linda Freed, at 486-9360, to discuss any questions or concerns the Kodiak Island Borough may have regarding your proposed project under their district coastal program. By copy of this letter we are informing the Corps of Engineers the review has begun. Sincerely, Carmen Den y Project Re iew Coordinator -) CC: Kodiak Island Borough Distribution List Bill Abadie, COE N 11 JUL 6 1993 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH DISTRIBUTION LIST July 1, 1993 Mr. Tim Smith, State Historic Preservation Office, Department of Natural Resources, Anchorage Mr. Larry Bullis, ACMP Liaison, Department of Natural Resources, Anchorage Ms. Carol Jo Sanner, Permits Officer, Dept. of Transportation & Public Facilities, Anchorage Mr. Donald 0. McKay, Habitat Division, Department of Fish & Game, Anchorage Ms. Elaine Pistoresi, PIC, Department of Environmental Conservation, Anchorage Ms. Linda L. Freed, Kodiak Island Borough, Kodiak Mr. U.L. Gross, Koniag, Inc., Anchorage Mr. Jerome Selby, Borough Mayor, Kodiak Island Borough, Kodiak Mr. Kelly Simeonoff, Jr., President, Kodiak Area Native Association, Kodiak Ms. Claire Holland, District Ranger, State Parks, Dept. of Nat. Resources, Kodiak r DEC Tim Rumfeit (907) 563-6529 DFG Don McKay (907) 267-02284(907) DNR Larry Bullis (907) 762-2249 COE Bill Abadie (907) 753-2712 PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET PROJECT TITLE: Kodiak Harbor 48 STATE I.D. NUMBER: AK 9307-01AA DGC CONTACT: Carmen Denny Phone: (907) 561-6131 Fax: (907) 561-6134 APPLICANT/PROPONENT: International Seafoods of Alaska AGENT: David Rogers Phone: (907) 486-4768 Fax: (907) 486-8180 DIRECT FEDERAL ACTION: N REVIEW TYPE: CONSISTENCY ACTIVITY TYPE: FISHERIES GENERAL FISHERIES PROCESSING WETLANDS DREDGING PROJECT LOCATION: Nearest Coastal District: KODIAK Project is inside the District Boundary District Plan Approved: Y Latitude 57D 50M OS Longitude 152D 23M OS Township 27S Range 19W Section 32 Meridian REVIEW SCHEDULE: 50 DAYS USGS Map 57152-Al Kod REVIEW MILESTONES: Day 1: 07/01/93 Reviewer Request for Add'I Info: 07/26/93 Comments Due To DGC: 08/04/93 Preliminary Determination Deadline: 08/14/93 Conclusive Determination Deadline: 08/20/93 PROJECT INFORMATION - 2 - July 1, 1993 Kodiak Harbor 48 PROJECT PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED UNDER STATE LD. NO. AK AK880912-10A STATE APPROVALS (AGENCY, APPROVAL TYPE AND NUMBER): DEC CERTIFICATION P-780260 FEDERAL APPROVALS (AGENCY, APPROVAL TYPE AND NUMBER): COE SECTION 404 P-780260 COE SECTION 10 REQUESTOR FOR EXTENSION: ELEVATION TO: ELEVATED BY: ACTION AT CLOSEOUT: Closeout Date: District Comments Received: For Conclusive Consistency Determinations: For Other Reviews: Comments Submitted: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Closeout entered into computer: (date) By: Updated: (date) By: Updated: (date) By: Updated: (date) By: Public Notice WiAnnyCorips Application a�� of Alaska District Regulatory Branch (1145b) for Permit Post Office Box 898 Anchorage, Alaska 99506 -0898 30 2 5 1993 Interested parties are hereby notified that an application has been received for a Department of the Army permit for certain work in waters of the United States, as described below and shown on the attached plan. PUBLIC NOTICE DATE: 21 JUNE 199 EXPIRATION DATE: 21 JULY 199 REFERENCE NUMBER: P-780260 WATERWAY NUMBER: Kodiak Harbor 48 APPLICANT: International Seafoods of Alaska, Incorporated, Post Office Box 2997, Kodiak, Alaska 99615; telephone number (907) 486 -4768. LOCATION: 612 Marine Way, Kodiak, Alaska, section 32, T. 27 S., R. 19 W., Seward Meridian. WORK: To dredge up to 1,000 cubic yards of material from the area in front of the net loft to a depth of -20 feet below Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW). The dredged material would be used as backfill for the new bulkhead. To remove the existing bulkhead and dock from the area in front of the bunk house and to construct approximately 200 feet of steel bulkhead with an open cell configuration. Work would include the discharge of approximately 7,000 cubic yards of fill material. To construct an approximately 250 foot long steel pile supported, concrete decked dock, 20' wide along the face of the bulkhead in front of the bunk house and cold storage installation. PURPOSE: To develop a deepwater dock and facilities for tramper /cargo vessel dockage in conjunction with cold storage, dry storage, and yard storage at a site adjacent to fish receiving and processing facilities. Docking facilities are needed that can accommodate vessels up to 400 feet in length (120 meters). ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Removal of the existing bulkhead and dock, and construction of the closed cell bulkhead and steel pile supported concrete decked dock from the area in front of the net loft and west of the process plant was previously authorized by Department of the Army permit number N- 780260, Kodiak Harbor 48. None of the previously authorized work has been constructed. Upon authorization of the proposed work, the applicant would relinquish authorization to construct approximately 200 feet of steel bulkhead, 200 feet of pile supported dock, and the dredging of 2,500 cubic yards of material from the far west end of International Seafoods of Alaska's property (area designated as 'A on the enclosed plans, sheet 3 of 4 dated May 24, 1993). International Seafoods of Alaska's point of contact "for this project is Mr. Tom Parsons. WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION:- A permit for the described work will not be issued until a certification or waiver of certification as required under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (Public Law 95-217), has been received from the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation. COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT ACT CERTIFICATION: Section 307(c)(3) of tne Coastal one Management Act of 1972, as amended by 16 U.S.C. 1456(c)(3), requires the applicant to certify that the described activity affecting land or water uses in the Coastal Zone complies with the Alaska Coastal Management Program. A permit will not be issued until the Office of Management and Budget, Division of Governmental Coordination has concurred with the applicant's certification._ PUBLIC HEARING: Any person may request, in writing, within the comment period specified in this notice, that a public hearing be held to consider this application. Requests for public hearings shall state, with particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing. CULTURAL RESOURCES: The latest published version of the Alaska Heritage Resources Survey (AHRS) has been consulted for the presence or absence of historic properties, including those listed in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. This worksite is not a registered or eligible property. Consultation of the AHRS constitutes the extent of cultural resource investigations by the District Engineer at this time, and he is otherwise unaware of the presence of such resources. This application is being coordinated with the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). Any comments SHPO may have concerning presently unknown archeological or historic data that may be lost or destroyed by work under the requested permit will be considered in our final assessment of the described work. ENDANGERED SPECIES: The project area is within the known or historic range of the Aleutian Canada Goose. Preliminarily, the described activity will not affect threatened or endangered species, or their critical habitat designated as endangered or threatened, under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (87 Stat. 844). This application is being coordinated with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service. Any comments they may have concerning endangered or threatened wildlife or plants or their critical habitat will be considered in our final assessment of the described work. -2- FEDERAL SPECIES OF CONCERN: The following Federal species of concern may use the project area: Steelhead Trout, Sockeye Salmon, Chinook Salmon, Coho Salmon, Polar Bear, Sea Otter, Black Brant, Canada Goose, Aleutian Canada Goose, Bald Eagle, and Tundra Swan. FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT: Evaluation of the described activity will include conformance with appropriate State or local flood plain standards; consideration of alternative sites and methods of accomplishment; and weighing of the positive, concentrated and dispersed, and short and long-term impacts on the flood plain. SPECIAL AREA DESIGNATION: None, EVALUATION: The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impacts including cumulative impacts of the proposed activity and its intended use on the public interest. Evaluation of the probable impacts which the proposed activity may have on the public interest requires a careful weighing of all those factors which become relevant in each particular case. The benefits which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. The decision whether to authorize a proposal, and if so the conditions under which it will be allowed to occur, are therefore determined by the outcome of the general balancing process. That decision should reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. All factors which may be relevant to the proposal must be considered including the cumulative effects thereof. Among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, floodplain values, land use, navigation, shore erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving 404 discharges, a permit will be denied if the discharge that would be authorized by such permit would not comply with the Environmental Protection Agency's 404(b)(1) guidelines. Subject to the preceding sentence and any other applicable guidelines or criteria (see Sections 320.2 and 320.3), a permit will be granted unless the District Engineer determines that it would be contrary to the public interest. The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State, and local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes; and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects, and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment and/or an Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act. Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity. Comments on the described work, with the reference number, should reach this office no later than the expiration date of this Public Notice to become part of the record and be considered in the decision. If further information is desired concerning this notice, contact Mr. Bill Abadie at (907) 753-2724, or toll free in Alaska at (800) 478-2712. AUTHORITY: This permit will be issued or denied under the following authorities: (X) Perform work in or affecting navigable waters of the United States - Section 10 Rivers and Harbors Act 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403). (X) Discharge dredged or fill material into waters of the United States - Section 404 Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). Therefore, our public interest review will consider the guidelines set forth under Section 404(b) of the Clean Water Act (40 CFR 230). A plan, Notice of Application for Certification of Consistency with the Alaska Coastal Management Program, and Notice of Application for State Water Quality Certification are attached to this Public Notice. District Engineer U.S. Army, Corps of Engineers Attachments %=-"1/43u.eig.5 Bo4i' -Zs C i3uwT� x c- ( Na yr-oN �1v�G5 2d 0:14c.p.grie. p maN65 MAD _ 7 ic16,0) izt-A1,1,0 e46 IxIgPtt; pC:ck Foci. tcv" J/kc �1DN -.O • W1- 2R97M PeczNwc N P- � M'-v k s1Ca4 -40: 1=a� 15L44 $ LNG • Kodiak Harbor 48 P- 780260 M 11 61 PROP 7' LINE— I3ut.Kt•I L+PJE DOCK • 0 tc H A r4 t.1 et- -6 0 01•IPAR,') Ale-A RP '`AND 0-0-ANNE-4. 1401-Et o� But.r.N ,Drx.>~ - -rAYZri OJT- AK') ;AVM-ACM') VJ /o? J cay,Sttt 1Eir ►uN4- wr... F►u- @ 7.0oo ..0 -1 Ar/ �.►_ ?o -4-181: r, � a J is • FRdpc&Qi )Co L-t 1 $Td 7_"fi - tNS'i7yc.L TtoN z5 — t. g -I Wc/irt 0LD ttiUL1(N ?0, XC4( - rM(er4 OUT An1D REPLhC 4 oreN1 C.L-. St-Pe-6T rIL1 NCT Rcc-K F►t� Q 13,000 C /Lok Aceil br iv ..n04-0) / .30 Pturl Cry P.) t.oi- Di .E iING -TO -ZOO PEP'itt 'FOR_ CA'i VVSSL.. —TY PIC.AcL. I7RA T V01-001C. Apnom 1000 c v,Yps, 4 4111 .9reeL sttetrr 1tut• rgulY R,y VI .v4(e-N `Cu - eal0t4 v.1/ zo "gocrr t,atDTti C.o NCAg-'4tr P oc.lC. Zu MI F - SYS'ilm ot■ 9r Bt Fife- TiL1146.S, 15 Lt t�1D 'Ogrob1" :DouC Fos, boo r/, 'EE p CARD 5111 PS t 5000 :oLDSTo?A T 1 bt', 1,ZPwkK SCE L E ''= 8 of Iov Lo Zo f'v 90 O PLAN VIEW ,DJ AcCEOT O w tS E • u L LEit P5o,11/4-1-' Ystmz, i - • I • SQJTt V-tNl1-TboNisil- seri°tRoop, Ot= P<LP•S1 A ?,o:302< 2.997 KoDl.Al( AK 9g (o15 ►5'nr•1Er?ocK -1)- 0\41D-2.-78024,0 boo ForoS ET ?t ivr MoDt FIGitic'1" terJ wofZ EPtiZ 1StrAtJD C�KAIsD4 L cl Ty or- Kov►Atc AK 'TIDELAND 11ZC -T Il2A /165 'rt-1c.RT1oN 3Y J `'1TI i -t4 /f' ►ot4Ai� - SEAF�c D Orr ,,,, , .., __, .z ri. ; .... ..... ..,..i. f‘ ,,,. . a Ay ,v. Qq j a ti ei„,6k/- ‘_ 1515 1 r`y` Dv° 7 tsl \goo 1' poci ‘O C• �p'��s � �� `' c � ` `� q y tiP �.ip•� c CPL.:0 51 1N�E Pt'c‘040o of ,' co0 5vp` 0 o oR- PROPER-Ty LINE' N 60 RA ROAD 275' HANNEL 'BOUNDARY LINE 381-* �I\ /\ /\ / \/∎ /\ /\/\ /\ /\ / \ / \ / \ / \/ \/ % / \ / \ /\ /N /\/\/ w\/\/\1\ / \/\ /\ /e WOOD EXISTINCr ibuLKNEAD DocK To 16E R,EMoVED ZEFotte FILL. APPLIED DUI- .KAEAD 114 FILL APPt -1E� CROSS SECTIo'J STEE STKQL ?IUIJ[r / vI /CONCRETE" CAP MEL. NN4 13U 1-1(1-1 EAD 11 20' . o RI 1 .9 • ,,.., ,„,...,......, /1 /ii II�.I'1.• .riLr. / e,Iis. it,' / • / \/ / •• .II\ /II / / /I / SCALE 1 ": LIOI. ?1-ACE bkFoKe° 11 \ 5 11 / / \ • .11.1111M .110 yO 20 0 3o Io yb 80 1♦ If 0 PROPERTY LINE 4) 33 -T'AGU RA ROAD \/!3/\/N/N/\/\/\/\/\,\/‘,Ni\/\/ / \/ /\ /\ /\ / \ /\ / \' \ /•*/\ /\ /\ /\ / \/ Wool) EX%STIN(r CSt,LKHEND UOGK- / To RE R.EMoVED $EFoR.E / FILL APPLIED / STEEL 3ULKN EA() 11.1 PUCE BEFURC FILL_ APPL1rD CHANNEL Boo NDARY LIWE cRoss SEC.''rt0 "C -1 " W/ g1S13L r11.1 KILT- co NCRI_r CAP STtEL. Du eKAIL WAD , 20 aitk op al __.... 5CALE 1 En= alma 410 20 0 30 10 Pv2 PaSE : poc.. FoR loom RE 6 FER. CARL O SH 1 PS 30001° GOLD cm-oitivar FOR KoDIAIL ADJACbNT OWNERS: FU LL.E 1Z 15c5 AT YA.R,t ■ SEC N V E fin/ SNTER.NAT1oNAl- SEAFOODS of NLAb CA P.a,. -60A 2997 K O O 1 / t 1�, AI( 94 (a I S z yo p \ / % Kodiak Harbor•S / P- 780260 PROPvsE D PERMIT MOD% F%C.ATION F'OIZ NEAR mi-ANU CHANNEL- / CI TY 'O F KO Di AK. AI( TIDELAND TRLT I(oA/I6$ SIUtET PATE: (0.1.93 E41ST11.1Cr DOCK PERMIT 0'7 1 -oYD -z-7802.1.0o tiCo0%0\ K. HA,►Zeort, L18 APPLI CA9'I O N b ' INTERNATIONAL SENF000s c F A L-AS KA rtrI OF &UM& OFFICE OF T uE GOVERNOR OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET DIVISION OF GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION STATE OF ALASKA DIVISION OF GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION Notice of Application for Certification of Consistency with the Alaska Coastal Management Program WALTER J. NICKEL, GOVERNOR CENTRAL OFFICE POST OFFICE BOX 110030 JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811 -0030 PHONE (907) 465 -3562 Notice is hereby given that a request is being filed with the Division of Governmental Coordination for concurrence, as provided in Section 307 (c)(3) of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended [P.L. 94 -370; 90 Stat. 1013; 16 U.S.C. 1456 (c)(3)], that the project described in the Corps of Engineers Public Notice No. P-780260 , will comply with the Alaska Coastal Management Program and that the project will be conducted in a manner consistent with that program. Any person desiring to present views pertaining to the project's compliance or consistence with the Alaska Coastal Management Program may do so by providing his views in writing to the Division of Governmental Coordination, Office of Management and Budget, Division of Governmental Coordination, South central Regional Office, 3601 C Street, Suite 370, Anchorage, Alaska 99503 -2798, within 30 days of publication of this notice. Attachment 2 DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR STATE WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION WALTER I. NICKEL, GOVERNOR rehgAmemoon 465-2600 Addreas: P.O. Box 0 Juneau, AK 99811-1800 Any applicant for a Federal license or permit to conduct any activity which may result in any discharge into the navigable waters must first apply for and obtain certification from the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation that any such discharge will comply with the Clean Water Act of 1977 (PL 95-217), the Alaska Water Quality Standards and other applicable State laws. By agreement between the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation application for a Department of the Army permit may also serve as application for State Water Quality Certification when such certification is necessary. Notice is hereby given that the application for a Department of the Army Permit described in the Corps of Engineers Public Notice No. P-780260 also serves as application for State Water Quality Certification from the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, as provided in Section 401 of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (PL 95-217). The Department will review the proposed activity to insure that any discharge to waters of the United States resulting from the referenced project will comply with the Clean Water Act of 1977 (PL 95-217) the Alaska Water Quality Standards and other applicable State laws. Any person desiring to comment on the water quality impacts of the proposed project may do so by writing to: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 3601 C Street, Suite 1350 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Tel ephone: 563-6529 within 30 days of publication of this notice. Attachment 3 OFFICE OF .: ANAGEMENT & BUDGET JUN 0 `l 1993 GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION Coastal Project Questionnaire and Cer. ification Statement Please answer all questions. To avoid a delay in processing, please call the department if you answer "yes" to any of the questions related to that department. Maps and plan drawings must be included with your packet. An incomplete packet will be returned. • APPLICANT INFORMATION ^ L 1. 11.1 ^L�N/4- lOt il0-L,,�Arr-GCS / 2. Name of Applicant ?D. 2577 Address /� � ,QD(�Q- - 11 4L 77415 City State Zip Code 4P6- .474R Daytime Phone • PROJECT INFORMATION l4-"'11� 2z6 � / ? Contact Person (5s Asa -. hid� dd �x Z?97 City state Zip Code OE i A 9-96/ 5 Daytime Phone �y (— ?a"?` - /Th Telecopy Number Yes 1. Has this project ever been reviewed by the State of Alaska'? Previous State I.D. Number: AKS£309 (Z - I Off! Previous Project Name: T)CYI‹. CC�FJST Jc ► rc J No 2. Provide a brief description of your entire project and ALL associated facilities (access roads, caretaker facilities, waste disposal sites, etc.). Please use an extra sheet of paper if necessary. COQ --LS l x -c'OtJ chi— �O L ST-Ol2 E rc Ci1- X7"1 ., CT (nC -7to0 o f /- S T i6 S C1 L L»i6s 4J 4-oub &souk- - _ c F-cR. C4-R6-0 Ski? (/m,zo— Ec ) 2 s,T" Proposed starting date for project: / i7()L /- 2,/ Proposed . ending date for project: l--b /e'3 3. Attach a detailed description of the project and all associated facilities. Include a project timeline for completion of all major activities in the proposal, a site plan depicting all proposed actions, and any other supporting documentation that would facilitate review of the project. Page 1 • PROJECT LOCATION 1. Location of project (include nearest community or name of the land.feature or body of water. Identify township, range and section): (SL/4-4-1.D CHI Q U i5 L(rr'&bi4 - H, -EtCR) , Township 7-27 .5 Range l2 -1 9 VJ Section 3 Z Meridian SEWRa Latitude/Longi ude5%7 50 � / / 52 �- 2 , v Al 2. The project is on: ❑ State Land* ❑ Federal Land ® Private Land ❑ Municipal Land *State land can be uplands, tidelands, or submerged lands to 3 miles o f `shore. See Question #1 in DNR section. 3. The project is located in which region (see attached map): ❑ Northern Egt Southcentral ❑ Southeast 4. Attach a copy of the topographical map with the project location marked on it. • CURRENT APPROVALS Yes No 1. Do you currently have any State or federal approvals for this project? �l ❑ Note: Approval means permit or any other form of authorization. If "yes," please list below: Approval Type Approval # State Review ID# (previously Expiration Date assigned by DGC) ,\j- 7&o26O 6gps c z-t 5 f-�c�jr r HeR 48 4h942- 3 / /:. 48804/2 /o,-- • FEDERAL APPROVALS 1. Is the proposed project on U.S. Forest Service (USFS) land or will you need to cross Yes No USFS lands for access? ❑ If yes, have you applied for or do you intend to apply for a USFS permit or approval? ❑ ❑ Date of submittal: Does the cost of the project exceed $250,000? ❑ ❑ 2. Will you be constructing a bridge over tidal (ocean) waters, or navigable rivers, streams or lakes? If yes, have you applied for or do you intend to apply for a U.S. Coast Guard permit for the bridges? Date of submittal: 3. Will you be placing structures or fills in any of the following: tidal (ocean) waters? streams? lakes? wetlands *? ❑ *If you are not certain whether your proposed project is in a wetlands, contact the U.S. Corps of Engi- neers, Regulatory Branch at (977) 753 -2720 for a wetlands determination (outside the Anchorage area call toll free 1 -800 -478- 2712.) Revised 12/92 r Page 2 If yes, have you applied for or do you intend to apply for a U.S. Army Corps of Yes No Engineers (COE) permit? .. ❑ Date of submittal: /--7-0/-.16 - /9 ?3 4. Have you applied for, or do you intend to apply for a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency National Pollution Discharge Elimination System permit? (Note: For information regarding the need for an NPDES permit, contact EPA u (907) 271 - 5083.) ❑ Date of submittal: 5. Have you applied for or do you intend to apply for permits from any other federal agency? ❑ AGENCY APPROVAL TYPE DATE SUBMITTED 1 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (DNR) APPROVALS Note: In addition to State -owned uplands, the State owns almost all land below the ordinary high water line of navigable streams, rivers and lakes, and the mean high tide line seaward for three miles. 1. Is the proposed project on State -owned land or will you need to cross State -owned land Yes for access? ❑ 2. Is any portion of your project to be placed on State -owned land below the ordinary high water line of a stream, river, or lake, or the mean high water line of a salt- water body? 3. Do you plan to construct an aquatic farm on State-owned land? ❑ 4. Do you plan to dredge or otherwise excavate /remove materials on State -owned land? .... ❑ Location of dredging site if other than the project site. (describe): Township Range Section Meridian Do you plan to place fill or dredged material on State -owned land? ❑ Location of fill disposal site if other than the project site. (describe): Township Range Section Meridian Source is on: ❑ State Land ❑ Federal Land ❑ Private Land ❑ Municipal Land Revised 12/92 Page 3 No Y 6. Do you plan to use any of the following State -owned resources: ❑ Timber: Will you be harvesting timber? Amount: ❑ Materials such as rock, sand or gravel, peat, soil, overburden, etc.: Which material? Amount: Location of source if other than the project site: (describe): Township Range section Meridian 7. Are you planning to use any fresh water? ❑ Amount (gallons per day): Source: Intended Use: 8. Will you be building or altering a dam? ❑ 9. Do you plan to drill a geothermal well? ❑ 10. At any one site (regardless of land ownership, do you plan to do any of the following? ❑ ❑ Mine five or more acres over a year's time? ❑ Mine 50,000 cubic yards or more of materials (rock, sand or gravel, soil, peat, overburden, etc.) over a year's time? ❑ Have a cumulative unreclaimed mined area of five or more acres? If you plan to mine less than the acreage /amount stated above and have a cumulative unreclaimed mined area of less than five acres, do you intend to file a voluntary recla- mation plan for approval? ❑ 11. Will you be exploring for or extracting coal? ❑ 12. Will you be drilling for oil /gas? ❑ 13. Will you be investigating or removing historical or archaeological resources on State - owned land? ❑ 14. Is the proposed project located in a unit of the Alaska State Park System? ❑ If you answered "No" to ALL questions in this section, you do not need an approval from DNR. Continue to next section. No ❑ TZI If you answered "Yes" to ANY questions in this section, contact DNR to identify and obtain necessary application forms. Revised 12/92 Page 4 Based on your discussion with DNR, please complete the following: Approval Type 15. Have you paid the filing fees required r ti-;,.2 DT TR permits? Date Submitted Yes No 16. If you answered yes to any questions and are not applying for DNR permits, indicate reason below: a. (DNR contact) told me on that no DNR approvals or permits were required on this project. Reason given by DNR: 0 b. Other: • DEPARTMENT OF FISH & GAME (DFG) APPROVALS Will you be working in, or placing anything in, a stream, river or work in running water or on ice, within the active flood plain, on the banks or the tidelands down to mean low tide.) Name of 1=1 stream, El river, or El lake: lake? (This includes islands, the face of Yes No e )(bc-4.544)_s 2. Will you do any of the following? Please indicate below: O Build a dam, river training structure or instream impoundment? O Use the water? 0 Pump water out of the stream or lake? 0 Divert or alter the natural stream channel? O Block or dam the stream (temporarily or permanently)? Change the water flow or the water channel? 0 Introduce silt, gravel, rock, petroleum products, debris, chemicals, or other organic/inorganic waste of any type into the water? ; describe: Altot>t 4,u 14 SMO6 D,2r_k 010 C2... C-HIPJICIE-- kzOL,4-_ eq? Ir-143 b4R- 461-a4-ele 1;1•#,W 20 FEE-5- -/2. u OF ext-A-osiVe-.5 15 A WAS %Sit- 11-V , Alter or stabilize the banks? • Mine or dig in the beds or banks? Use explosives? Build a bridge (including an ice bridge)? • Use the stream as a road ,(even when frozen), or crossing the stream with tracked or wheeled vehicles, log- dragging or excavation equipment (back- hoes, bulldozers, etc.)? O Install a culvert or other drainage structure? Construct a weir? • Use an in-stream structure not mentioned here? Revised 12/92 Page 5 3. Is your project located in a designated State Game Refuge, Critical Habitat Area or Yes No State Sanctuary? ❑ �• 4. Does your project include the construction /operation of a salmon hatchery? ❑ 5, Does your project affect, or is it related to, a previously permitted salmon hatchery? ❑ 6. Does your project include the construction of an aquatic farm? ❑ If you answered "No" to ALL questions in this section, you do not need approval from DFG. Continue to next section. If you answered "Yes" to ANY questions under 1 -3, contact the Regional DFG Habitat Division Office for information and application forms. If you answered "Yes" to questions 4-6, contact the DFG at the FRED division headquarters for information and application forms. Based on your discussion with DFG, please complete the following: Approval Type Date Submitted 7 If you answered yes to any questions and are not applying for DFG permits, indicate reason below: ❑ a. (DFG contact) told me on approvals or permits were required on this project. Reason given by DFG: that no DFG ❑ b. Other: $ DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION (DEC) APPROVALS 1 Will a discharge of wastewater or stormwater drainage from industrial or commercial Yes No operations occur including marine drainage? ❑ If so, will you be connecting to an already approved sewer system? ❑ ❑ 2. Do you intend to construct, install or modify any part of a wastewater (sewage or greywater) disposal system? ❑ a) If so, will the discharge be 500 gpd or greater? ❑ b) If constructing a domestic wastewater treatment or disposal system, will the system be located within fill material? ❑ Revised 12/92 Page 6 ( r , If your previous answer is yes, answer the following: Yes No 1) How deep is the bottom of the system to the top of the subsurface water table? 2) How far is any part of the wastewater 'disposal system from the nearest surface water? 3) Is the surrounding area inundated with water at any time of the year? 4) How big is the fill area to be used for the absorption system? • (Questions 1 & 2 will be used by DEC to determine whether separation distances are being met; Questions 3 & 4 relate to the required size of the fill is wetlands are involved.) 3. Do you expect to request a mixing zone for your proposed project? (7f your wastewater discharge will exceed Alaska water quality standards, you may apply for a mixing zone. If so, please contact DEC to discuss information required under 18 /LAC 70.032.) 4. Will the project result in either of the following: g Dredging in a wetland or other water body? fig. Placement of fill materials or a structure in a wetland or other waterbody? (Note: Your application for this activity to the Corps of Engineers also serves as your application to DEC.) 5. Do you plan to store or dispose of any type of solid waste at the project site? 6. Will your project require the application of oil, pesticides, and/or any other broadcast chemicals to the surface of the land and/or the waters of the state? El 7. a. Will you have a facility that will generate air emissions from processing greater than five tons per hour of material? b. Will you have one or more units of fuel burning-equipment, including flaring, with a heat inputrating of 50 million Btu per hour or more? . . . . . . . . . c. 1) Will you have a facility containing incinerators with a total charging capacity of 1,000 pounds per hour or more? El 2) Do you incinerate sludge? C3 d. Will you have any of the following processes: . . . — ....... . EJ O Asphalt plant O Petroleum refinery El Petroleum Contaminated Soils Cleanup O Coal preparation facility O Portland cement plant e. Will your facility use the following equipment? 0 0 diesel internal combustion engines? (Total capacity equal to or greater than 1,750 kilowatts or total rated brake specific horsepower greater than 2350 bhp) O gas tired boilers (Total heat input rating of 100 million Btu per hour) O oil tired boilers (Total heat input rating of 65 million Btu per hour) O combustion turbines (total rated power output of 8,000 Hp) Revised 12/92 Page 7 f Will your facility burn more than the following per year in stationary equip- Yes No ment? O 1,000,000 gallons of fuel oil O 900 million cubic feet of natural gas O 35,000 tons of coal g. If you have answered "yes" to any of the above questions (7 a-f), have you in- stalled, replaced or modified any fuel burning or processing equipment since 1977? Will you be developing, constructing, installing, or altering a public water system? . 9. a. Will your project involve the operation of waterborne tank vessels or oil barges that carry crude or non-crude oil as bulk cargo, or the transfer of oil or other petroleum products to or from such a vessel or a pipeline system? b. Will your project require or include onshore or offshore oil facilities with an effective aggregate storage capacity of greater than 5,000 barrels of crude oil or greater than 10,000 barrels of non-crude oil? 17- c. Will you be operating facilities on the land or water for the exploration or pro- duction of hydrocarbons? 10. Will you be subdividing lands into two or more lots (parcels)? LJ If you answered NO to ALL questions in this section, you do not need a permit or approval from DEC. Please continue to certification statement. If you answered YES to ANY of these questions (see #4 note), contact the DEC Regional office for information and application forms. Based on your discussion with DEC, please complete the following: Approval Type Date Submitted 11. If you answered yes to any questions and are not applying for DEC permits, indicate reason below: 0 a. (DEC contact) told me on that no DEC approvals or permits were required on this project. Reason given by DEC: 18:1 Revised 12/92 b. Other: EE-41.11.4 OTC) 4PLICA1100 Cult.Ps o erAGAr4 E'ER-5 5EZ.vf..S nuS Page 8 FORP05E- . Certification Statement The information contained herein is true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I certify that the proposed activity complies with, and will be conducted in a manner consistent with, the Alaska Coastal agement Progr Signature of Applicant or Agent k44-4 Et, ?3 1 ,J ONE t993 Date Note: Federal agencies conducting an activity that will affect the coastal zone are required to submit a federal consistency determination, per 15 CFR 930, Subpart C, rather than this certification statement. • To complete your packet, please attach your State permit applications and copies of your federal permit applications to this questionnaire. Revised 12/92 Page 9 RTE YNAnoNA 'EPoOp5 aF 11.E ►G ?L/itJ4 1 LI- 70 -I- re? � • LeJ�1, t\lcifC oLD >5uL►CN fl,PocK Ti4KerN Ou` AND RePVM. OPEN COLL. S 111.1IJ& ROur_ FILL. e 13,©00 cv• 1401-0- D,Z X N(TTo -zo' PEP 1tt FOK CA ,c VE 5S8L, —T1 i1GAL D RoWT, YoLV Mme' , 17rtom 100© c v.VaS• pruNG Gt y R) cHAANEL tZoonlAARy kAR 15 L.g r4D rub•.! "1\> v •"/`"r ORPOf :Doc ¶DR too to EE PER CA1Z O5WPS t S o t.D SToRAC -s�' 1 o V, Kt3DvAK �;� _ -Z "c -►� L e, tf b1 5Teei- Stte tr p1,►..1t 17R14 -N 1v " -1 '1O N vJ/ zoircxsr W ►DTtt CPtslacAawnr Doc.tC o rAQ' - 5YSi-la-M or4 5t - F1 TtL1•IGS, 4--,4k R. 15 SCA LE- i " =go' 1—I 1 0 6o zo °dD..20. 6-63 ADO PLAN VIEW ,DJ ACC •JT O W 4aR6 O L 1 -ER.. F3oletir Yo(p.,t �NTU RNDTIoNA 6'EAFocD (DP' f\1..ANSI<A F,0. 50X 2997 1KoD1AK, AK. 'i4(o►5 orc5£t t4Icy Ao17.1 nc -r or\f roR- EAR. 15L-AN'D c MNP4 L c1Ty oP Kov►AK, A < - TIDELAND TKO" I(A /►bt) I PATE'v -I MA 1993 EX ►5fl N (r Poc.K p. uxN►)1' o71- oVD- Z -7ao2 ,o Kot-� I A K NA R. Do 4e, APFLIcArtoN �Y S tiTh- 1zN ter10 NAL- .SEAF0 011aS OR ALASKA ° l k5 6fk r-1 IA ti‘ ryh •• ISO AO SO �0O coo �H�o foR- PRoFE y L1 N O -A A• 275' CHANNEL T30u r i ARY L,1Nt s11r:gL ?IuJ6, / 584 vA /CoNGrtE't CAP STEEL. p )LKHEAD 0 4 ♦/` /1 /∎ / \/ti / \ / \/\ /\ /\ / \/ \ / •/\ WOOD Ex16TI NCr 15uLKHEAD DOCK To itsE REMOVED ISEFocte, FILL APPLIED STEEL- Dt,;l_Ko-1EAD IN PLACE 15EFoi+<f FILL APPI.+ED CR ©55 5EcrtoN ►+p -11' / SCALE 1 "- 1O' 111` + / II \ ti / / ;` 440 20 0 30 to L10 80 PROPERTY LINE 4—J 11 CHANNEL BouNDARY LINE AG-URA ROAD /•/1/\/\/ \ / \/\ / \/\ / ♦ / \ / \/ Wr SreEZ L. P+ L1 N 6-- CoNCREr CARS STE It L. DU LAM WAD , 20 1 IS / /\ /\ /� /\ / \ /\. \ /.. /\ /\ / \ /\ / \/ Wobi) ex 5TlN6- €501- .rLNEND DOGK. / To RE RZEMoVED 5EFoREV /11 --- es--- FILL AP PLI ED /:;/ STEEL 5uLK.NEA0 IN PACE BER R.€' FILL_ AP PLI E D CRO55 5ECT1oN t " 1 1 •11\1 r / / 1 / 1 1 \ SCA • • / ' N / 11 / ♦ II \ mat fliml 11=1111 a1Q Al O 2o 30 10 0 410 1 PL.) R POSE : pocK Fo R I' O M RE 6 FER CARGO 5N I PS 3-DO ©T coL D SToftANE FoR KADIAK . ADJ AC.I Ni PRoPvSED PicRMir FULL R ec2 AT YA R.C> Ex +STI Nc.- © -71 -o-/D -z -7802. %<00%1•K. 1-1/\►2 c R L4 site T ` f4 PATE: (01. q CITY ' ©F KO Di AK. AIG Ti DE L.ANO TRC.T ltnt\�Ito APPLICAV'ION By ENTER.NhTKONAL SENF000s pF A LAS KA ALASKA DIVISION OF GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION Southcentral Regional Office 3601 C Street �f � Suite 370 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Dear Ms. Heitz: The project goal is to realize deepwater dock for tramper/cargo vessel dockage in conjunction with cold storage/ dry storage/yard storage at a site proximate to adjacent fish receiving and processing facilities. The plan enclosed takes full advantage of existing real property and improvements thereupon to achieve maximum desired use with minimum alteration and impact. For these very good reasons a modification to Department of the Army (DA) permit 0-780260, Kodiak Harbor 48, now referred to by your assignment No P-780260, is being submitted for your approval. Specifically, the modified permit will enable development of a site adjacent to the one already permitted and approved but at less cost and impact while featuring greater utility and benefit. The Modification relocates a 200 foot portion of dock from the southwestern portion of the previously approved and permitted location on a City of Kodiak Tideland Tract P-15 to a site 390 feet Northeast on the recently acquired City of Kodiak Tideland Tract 168. The new site features a superior, natural, deepwater frontage on Near Island Channel within the confines of both property and navigable channel boundaries at a location adjacent to the Channel's widening entrance. It needs no dredging as opposed to the permitted requirement of substantial dredging at the project's prior location. As the object of the project is to provide dockage for tramper/cargo vessels of considerable length, it affords greater safety and utility from its advantageous location. Additionally, the site features a large (in excess of one acre) amount of unimproved land that was previously filled to an elevation in excess of 19 feet several years past. Settling and compaction have already taken place. Joining the requested dock modification to the existing land requires much less fill material be used than is already approved at the permitted site. -2- Immediately adjacent to this filled land are a modern, yet inactive fish processing facility and what remains of an obsolete salmon canning plant~ This project will renovate and join these two facilities creating one structure affording 5000 tons of cold storage capacity as well as 1000 tons of dry storage capacity. Refrigeration equipment exceeding demand requirements to supply the cold storage portion is already on site and in place as it previously served the process plant's blast and plate freezers. Minor replumbing of distribution lines and relocation of some equipment is all that is required for the existing system to more than satisfy the needs of this project. In sum, the requested modification satisfies the original need as already approved and permitted but at a substantially higher level of benefit featuring additional advantages not available at the prior site. Importance must also be placed on the multiple objectives this project does serve including the importation of fish and fish products into the community for primary and secondary (value added) processing that will make use of idle plant and equipment during seasonally down periods. In a timeline sequence the major components will be in place and completed in a six month timeframm. This is more timely than the prior site would allow. This short synthesis cannot fully impress you with the positive and lucrative benefit afforded by realizing this project. I am hopeful you agree and endorse modification of the existing permit enabling and enhancing it's completion. Please freely contact me with any questions or comments you may have. Thank you. Respectfully, Tom Parsons Manager, Eagle Properties International Seafoods of Alaska P°O"8nx 2997 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Phone: 1-486-4768 Fax: 1-486-4885 w/enclosures cc David L. Rogers Public Notice of Alaska District Regulatory Branch (1145b) for Permit Post Office Box 898 Anchorage, Alaska 99506 -0898 REVISION CENPA -CO No. P- 780260 Kodiak Harbor 48 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: 28 JUNE 1993 On June 21, 1993, the Alaska District Corps of Engineers published Public Notice No. P- 780260, Kodiak Harbor 48, for an application received for a Department of the Army permit from International Seafoods of Alaska, Incorporated to dredge, remove an existing bulkhead and dock, and to construct a open cell bulkhead and dock at 612 Marine Way in Kodiak, Alaska. In the ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section of the public notice, it states that the applicant would be willing to relinquish authorization to dredge up to 2,500 cubic yards of material from the far west end of the property. This information is incorrect and should instead read: Upon authorization of the proposed work, the applicant would relinquish authorization to construct approximately. 200 feet of steel bulkhead, 200 feet of pile supported dock, and the dredging of 1,500 cubic yards of material from the far west end of International Seafoods of Alaska's property (area designated as 'A' on the enclosed plans, sheet 3 of 4, dated May 24, 1993). All other information contained in the previous notice remains the same. Please bring this announcement to the attention of anyone you know who is or may be interested. If further information is desired concerning this notice contact Mr. Bill Abadie at (907) 753-2724 or toll free in Alaska at (800) 478 -2712. District Engineer U.S. Army, Corps of Engineers US Army Corps A of Engineers Department of the Army Alaska District, Corps of Engineers Attn: ICEIWA`tC0-it, (C)- 12;0. Box 898? Anchorage, Alaska 99506-0898 PLANNING ZONING OOMMISSION KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK ALASKA 99615 FIRST CLASS MAIL . U.S. POSTAGE PAID ANCHORAGE:; ALASKA PERMIT Nci:1304 MEMORANDUM TO: Carmen Denny Project Review Coordinator Division of Governmental Coordination Office of Management and Budget FROM: C. Wahine Doleza Habitat Biologist Region II Habitat and Restoration Division Department of Fish and Game State of Alaska DEPARTMENT OF FISH & GAME DATE: August 4, 1993 FILE NO.: TELEPHONE NO.: 267 -2284 SUBJECT: International Seafoods of Alaska Kodiak Harbor 48 SID AK9307 -01AA COE No. P- 780260 Dock Construction The Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF &G) has reviewed the dock construction project referenced above. The project entails the removal of the existing bulkhead and dock found in the Near Island channel east of the International Seafoods of Alaska (ISA) bunk house and warehouse. Following removal, an open cell, steel sheetpile bulkhead would be installed and back - filled with approximately 7,000 cubic yards of material. Although the Corps of Engineers/ public notice states that the bulkhead will be 200 feet long, the plan view (i.e., sheet 2 of 4) indicates that the bulkhead will be in excess of 380 feet long and would extend from just north of the cannery building to the warehouse. The public notice also states that the bulkhead will be faced with a 20 foot wide, steel pile supported, concrete decked dock that will be 250 feet long. Again, the plan view shows that the concrete dock and bumper system will be in excess of 380 feet long. The proposal includes dredging of up to 1,000 cubic yards of material near the southern end of the project site to provide a depth of -20 feet at mean lower low water adjacent to the face of the dock. On page 5 of the coastal project questionnaire the applicant indicates that explosives may be used as part of the construction /dredging activity, however, the blasting method to be used is not identified. The Near Island channel supports Steller sea lions (a species classified as threatened under the Endangered Species Act), a wide variety of seabirds, as well as adult and juvenile salmon and herring, Dolly Varden, and several species of marine fishes. The use of explosives raises concern for the potential to injure or kill fish and wildlife found in the water column in the vicinity of the blasting. The ADF &G recommends that the project be found consistent with the standards of the Alaska Coastal Management Program (ACMP), the department provided the following conditions are incorporated in project approvals: d AUG m 91993 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Carmen Denny -2- August 4, 1993 1. Blasting shall be scheduled at a time when few birds or marine mammals are in the vicinity. 2. Prior to each blast, the area shall be patrolled by boat or on the shore, and devices /techniques and personnel authorized by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service shall be used to move birds and marine mammals away from the project area. 3. For blasting, employing either the dobying or drill -and- blast technique, within the Near Island channel, the size of individual explosive charges shall be minimized to reduce resultant hydrostatic pressure waves. Maximum allowable shock wave impulse strengths at specific distances from the blast site shall be employed. An upper limit of 0.69 bar per millisecond (i.e., 10 pounds per square inch per millisecond) as measured at the mid- water- column depth 150 meters from the charge shall be employed. Each blast shall be closely monitored, the hydrostatic pressures measured and recorded, and the charges adjusted as necessary to insure that "allowable" hydrostatic over- pressures are not exceeded. 4. After each detonation, a visual survey shall be made of the Near Island channel within 400 meters of the blast and all dead fish and wildlife removed from the water to prevent attraction of foraging fish and wildlife to the area. Animal carcasses shall be disposed of at an upland location and in accordance with any state or federal requirements for such disposal. The above conditions are necessary according to the Habitats Standard (6 AAC 80.130) of the ACMP. These conditions provide for adequate protection of the sea lions found in the area. The recommended upper limit (i.e., 10 psi /millisecond) in stipulation 3 was derived from the scientific literature (Wright, 1982) to prevent serious damage to diving mammals and, incidentally, diving birds. The recommended monitoring point was derived using the Impulse Strength Calculation feature of the Impulse Strength Blast Model prepared by Coastline Environmental Services, Ltd., B202 -355 Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 2Gb. Because many factors influence the shock wave as it travels through water it is imperative that site specific measurements are made and, if necessary, the blasting scenario (e.g., detonation timing, charge weight, explosive material, etc.) be modified if unacceptably high impulse strengths are observed. We appreciate the opportunity to comment. If you have any specific questions, please contact me at 267 -2333. Carmen Denny -3- August 4, 1993 cc: T. Rumfelt, DEC D. Kohler, COE B. Smith, NNE'S L. Fairchild, USFWS H. Dean, EPA R. Smith, ADF&G P. Probasco, ADF&G L. Schwarz, ADF&G L. Freed, KIB D. Rogers, International Seafoods of Alaska REPLY TO ATTENTION OF: Regulatory Branch Project Evaluation Section-South DEPARTMENTCM:11-11E/MRIWY U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, ALASKA P.O. BOX 898 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99506-0898 PERMITTEE: *International Seafoods of Alaska, Incorporated EFFECTIVE DATE: 31 MARCH 1993 REFERENCE NO, Kodiak Harbor 48, 0-780260 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT MODIFICATION Department of the Army (DA) permit No. 72-033, Kodiak Harbor 48, was issued to Alaska Welding Enterprises, P.O. Box 2575, Kodiak, Alaska 99615, on March 15, 1972, to: "construct a bulkhead and fill in Kodiak Harbor at Kodiak, Alaska." This authorization was transferred to International Seafoods, Inc., P. O. Box 2997, Kodiak, Alaska, in November 1978. DA permit No. 2-780260, Kodiak Harbor 48, was issued to International Seafoods, Inc., on April 10, 1978 to: "retain and preserve an existing fill and dock and to construct additional facilities consisting of a dock extension at Kodiak Harbor, Kodiak Alaska." DA modification No. M-780260, Kodiak Harbor 48, was issued to International Seafoods of Alaska, Inc. on October 21, 1987, to: "modify an existing dock by constructing a floating wooden pontoon dock measuring 6' wide by 125' long, and secured in place with slide rings to eight 12" diameter steel pipe pilings, which shall be driven into the sea floor to rejection by a barge-mounted pile driver. The floating dock shall connect to the existing dock via a 12' X 6' secondary floating wooden pontoon dock and a fixed galvanized steel land ramp 3' wide by 39' long. All dock lighting will be according to the U.S. Coast Guard requirements. No dredging or use of dredge material will occur." COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT -2- DA modification No. N-780260, Kodiak Harbor 48, was issued to International Seafoods of Alaska, Inc. on April 24, 1990, to: "place approximately 50,000 cubic yards (cy), dredge 2,500 cy, and construct a steel pile-supported dock and a steel bulkhead in the waters of the U.S: A. The existing wooden dock and bulkhead components indicated on sheet 3/3, cross-section "B-B" will be removed via a shore mounted crane; B. A steel bulkhead with closed-cell configuration will be constructed on the northeastern and southwestern ends of the existing dock via a barge mounted pile-driver (crane)." In accordance with your request, dated March 29, 1993, general condition 1 of your Department of the Army permit is hereby amended to read as follows: "1. The time limit for completing the work authorized ends on March 31, 1996. If you find that you need more time to complete the authorized activity, submit your request for a time extension to this office for consideration at least one month before the above date is reached." All other conditions under which remain in full force and effect. If completed within 3 years of the date this modification, if not previously shall automatically expire. the subject authorization was made the activity authorized herein is not of this letter, the authorization of revoked or specifically extended, This authorization should be attached to the original permit. BY AUTHORITY OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY: Georgina Akers Chief, West Unit Project Evaluation Section - South APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT AND CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANY - CITY OF KODIAK - KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH - BUILDING DEPARTMENT Telephone: 486 -8070 700 Mill Bay Road PEN AND PRESS FIRMLY.) (OFFICE USE ONLY) STREET ADDRESS: i/ L_• .:� • CLASS AND SCOPE OF WORK: SPECIFICATIONS: BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER: DATE OF APPLICATION: LOT : ` j BLOCK : ? .} 4 ~ I- "A NEW DEMOLITION FOUNDATION FOOTINGS STEM WALL PIERS ZONING COMPLIANCE : DATE ISSUED: ALTERATION REPAIR TYPE SUBDIVISION / SURVEY: ADDITION MOVE DIMENSIONS VALUATION BASIS: BUILDING PERMIT FEE: DEPTH IN GRND E R NAME: 04, it ; ::�'r USE OF BUILDING AUTHORIZED BY THIS PERMIT: �' REINFORCEMENT VALUATION: PLAN CHECK FEE: E � � � BOLT SPACING CRAWL SPACE HEIGHT INCHES OCCUPANCY GROUP: TOTAL FEE: MAILING ADDRESS: :-.(2 y % 7 A B E H I M R DIV. 1 2 3 4 5 6 CRAWL SPACE VENT SQ. FEET RECEIPT NO.: CITY & STATE: 6 • SIZE ..;-, % HEIGHT STRUCTURAL SPECIES & GRADE SIZE SPACING SPAN EACH OF THE FOLLOWING STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION REQUIRES INSPECTION BE REQUESTED & COMPLETED PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH ANY FURTHER WORK: FOR INSPECTION CALL 486 -8070 NO. OF ROOMS STORIES TELEPHONE )/, . NO. OF FAMILIES GIRDERS TYPE OF BUSINESS GIRDERS A R C H / E N G NAME: NO. OF BLDGS NOW ON LOT JOISTS 1ST FLOOR USE OF EXISTING BLDGS JOISTS 1ST FLOOR TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION JOISTS 2ND FLOOR I II III IV V N 1 -HR FR H.T. SIZE OF LOT ~ WATER: PUBLIC , PRIVATE JOISTS 2ND FLOOR CITY & STATE: SEWER: PUBLIC PRIVATE CEILING JOISTS EXCAVATION INSULATION TYPE & THICKNESS: EXTERIOR WALLS BEARING WALLS UNDERGROUND UTILITIES TELEPHONE : FOUNDATION INTERIOR WALLS DRIVEWAY PERMIT: FOUNDATION / SETBACKS SUBMITTED FRAMING STATE LICENSE : WALLS ROOF RAFTERS ROOF / CEILING TRUSSES APPROVED ROUGH ELECTRICAL C IN T R A C 1 R NAME: SHEATHING TYPE & SIZE: FURNACE TYPE: ., ROUGH PLUMBING ADEC APPLICATION: FINAL FLOOR % /'t/ '; r,,,e,vel SUBMITTED DATE C.O. ISSUED: WOOD HEATER YES NO TYPE MAILING ADDRESS: FINAL APPROVAL WALLS ALASKA FIREMARSHALL REVIEW: SUBMITTED: L/ APPROVED: CITY & STATE: ROOF I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION, THAT IT IS CORRECT AND THAT I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH ALL ORDINANCES AND LAWS REGULATING BUILDING CONSTRUCTION APPLICANT: TELEPHONE : FINISH MATERIAL: ----? / t' 7--------. ROOF STATE LICENSE : EXTERIOR SIDING APPROVED- BUILDING OFFICAL: _ INTERIOR WALLS NOTES: , , 4 d c- i I Q\" ,.:..1 a Cd, u't, L P De It \f1n4 kKodt1� y G { APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT AND CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANY - CITY OF KODIAK - KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH - BUILDING DEPARTMENT Telephone: 486 -8070 700 Mill Bay Road (OFFICE USE ONLY) (APPLICANT TO FILL IN ALL INI- U1IVIH1IUN VViiniw auLu - STREET ADDRESS: I2 �I f.1. Wind CLASS AND SCOPE OF WORK: SPECIFICATIONS: FOUNDATION FOOTINGS STEM WALL PIERS BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER: DATE OF APPLICATION: / �-/ 2 . /I/ DATE ISSUED: c r q l ZONING COMPLIANCE LOT : BLOCK : NEW DEMOLITION '(-- 9 /- / C 7 ALTERATION REPAIR TYPE SUBDIVISION 71 / SURVEY: ADDITION / MOVE DIMENSIONS X IZ'i )C2 •'O/ VALUATION BASIS: BUILDING PERMIT FEE: 2 5. c l /- / >.Z) > 5�, ?LAN CHECK FEE: T) A P ' t - Zg DEPTH IN GRND LI - E-C- NAME: `� `^ `^ I IJ J�S10,1\1 l� USE OF BUILDING PERMIT: � AUTHORIZED � BY THIS N.S� ^ r HEIGHT �9 REINFORCEMENT 5---L. �- VALUATION: BOLT SPACING 12 '' 4-- / 15 C), 7, z 3 C MAILING ADDRESS: O �� � � �� CRAWL SPACE HEIGHT /�:f INCHES OCCUPANCY GROUP: TOTAL FEE: / A �) E H I M R DIV. 1 2 3 5 6 5 CRAWL SPACE VENT STRUCTURAL SPECIES & GRADE // SIZE SQ. SPACING FEET SPAN RECEIPT NO.: Z L1 ) � R CITY & STATE: ����/ N-'c�-- �Tc��_ _ SIZE 8 X75 EACH OF THE FOLLOWING STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION REQUIRES INSPECTION BE REQUESTED & COMPLETED PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH ANY FURTHER WORK: FOR INSPECTION CALL 486 -8070 NO. OF ROOMS / STORIES / ` TELEPHONE \ - Q7- Q,ee-4. & NO. OF FAMILIES GIRDERS TYPE OF BUSINESS 001 NO. OF BLDGS NOW ON LOT 1 GIRDERS JOISTS 1ST FLOOR A R C H / E N G NAME: 2-(,H 140-IJ) L USE OF EXISTING BLDGS SIZE OF LOT 2 41 coD JOISTS 1ST FLOOR TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION • \/1C1-4 6' PrZ- JOISTS 2ND FLOOR 1 11 111 IV G 1 -HR FR H.T. 1- X61- 4/ark'n t WATER: PUBLIC PRIVATE JOISTS 2ND FLOOR sae i� -s e ?n1J �r la CITY & STATE: - /.1GI-dO ALt4S SEWER: PUBLIC i( PRIVATE CEILING JOISTS INSULATION TYPE & THICKNESS: � EXTERIOR WALLS EXCAVATION BEARING WALLS ,.,__- 2")0011a-'S 4v 17 2 + -�I UNDERGROUND UTILITIES TELEPHONE L� l -� ©(� I _ 907- 5 �I FOUNDATION � � y'fl+ ="+ INTERIOR WALLS DRIVEWAY PERMIT: FOUNDATION / SETBACKS FRAMING STATE LICENSE : WALLS - I ASS ROOF RAFTERS SUBMITTED i F -iE ROOF / CEILING 2 -3cD - TRUSSES APPROVED / ROUGH ELECTRICAL 0 T R C T R NAME: c �.G�o� /�rtti5 SHEATHING TYPE & SIZE: FURNACE TYPE: I� /� TROUGH PLUMBING ADEC APPLICATION: FINAL FLOOR 11ti� WOOD HEATER YES NO i____)/ � SUBMITTED /J� DATE C.O. ISSUED: / MAILING ADDRESS: jb FINAL APPROVAL WALLS 5/8 PLy GDx ALASKA FIREMARSHALL REVIEW: r'...--c.f... . /o ,-r- 7(„ Gi / 2A Ck � C • J -t_ ��., y/ v ;;, v r `� / I CITY &STATE:, ; c c( O _ ROOF S "�I L7 � TYPE I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE I AGREE TO COMPLY CONSTRU' ( I 1J l� READ THIS WITH ALL APPLICATION, THAT IT IS ORDINANCES AND LAWS SUBMITTED: Iz /2 /��/ APPROVED: TELEPHONE C `` GG �f > J1` FINISH MATERIAL: CORRECT AND THAT REGULATIIQ�'81jILDING ROOF M�_ ik. APPROVED-BUILDING OFFICAL: I. 1�9Z 1 STATE ICENSE. -�� // �, EXTERIOR SIDING I�(�5� -L INTERIOR WALLS PLASTIC_ APPLICANT: ��� ,EZr7�_ �OL� NOTES: c SVeckar " >^r,AP, 1` / ✓, Cov, }vaL � % Y Vii{' APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT AND CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANY - CITY OF KODIAK - KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH - BUILDING DEPARTMENT Telephone: 486 -8070 700 Mill Bay Road P ICANT TO FILL IN ALL INFORMATION WITHIN BOLD LINES PLEASE PRINT USE A BALLPOINT PEN AND PRESS FIRMLY.) (OFFICE USE ONLY) (APL STREET ADDRESS: __ i%iC..t.IL.k CLASS AND SCOPE OF WORK: SPECIFICATIONS: BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER: DATE OF APPLICATION: DATE ISSUED: LOT t: ) tt BLOCK : 1� NEW DEMOLITION FOUNDATION FOOTINGS STEM WALL PIERS ZONING COMPLIANCE : ALTERATION REPAIR TYPE SUBDIVISION /SURVEY: ADDITION MOVE DIMENSIONS VALUATION BASIS: BUILDING PERMIT FEE: DEPTH IN GRND E R NAME: ,Ar r` i, -:" USE OF BUILDING AUTHORIZED BY THIS PERMIT: REINFORCEMENT VALUATION: TION PLAN CHECK FEE: BOLT SPACING OCCUPANCY GROUP: TOTAL FEE: CRAWL SPACE HEIGHT INCHES MAILING ADDRESS: A B E H I M R DIV. 1 2 3 4 5 6 CRAWL SPACE VENT SQ. FEET RECEIPT NO.: CITY & STATE: SIZE /� 'v �� HEIGHT STRUCTURAL SPECIES & GRADE SIZE SPACING SPAN EACH OF THE FOLLOWING STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION REQUIRES INSPECTION BE REQUESTED & COMPLETED PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH ANY FURTHER WORK: FOR INSPECTION CALL 4868070 NO. OF ROOMS STORIES _ TELEPHONE : NO. OF FAMILIES GIRDERS TYPE OF BUSINESS GIRDERS A R C H / E N G NAME: NO. OF BLDGS NOW ON LOT JOISTS 1ST FLOOR USE OF EXISTING BLDGS SIZE OF LOT JOISTS 1ST FLOOR JOISTS 2ND FLOOR TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION I II III IV V N 1 -HR FR H.T. WATER: PUBLIC PRIVATE JOISTS 2ND FLOOR CITY & STATE: SEWER: PUBLIC PRIVATE I CEILING JOISTS EXCAVATION INSULATION TYPE & THICKNESS: EXTERIOR WALLS BEARING WALLS UNDERGROUND UTILITIES TELEPHONE : FOUNDATION INTERIOR WALLS DRIVEWAY PERMIT: FOUNDATION / SETBACKS SUBMITTED FRAMING STATE LICENSE : WALLS ROOF RAFTERS ROOF / CEILING TRUSSES APPROVED ROUGH ELECTRICAL ROUGH PLUMBING N T R A C 1 R NAME: SHEATHING TYPE & SIZE: FURNACE TYPE: ADEC APPLICATION: FINAL FLOOR :hi' (..7. % % {4.e,94- SUBMITTED DATE C.O. ISSUED: WOOD HEATER YES NO TYPE MAILING ADDRESS: FINAL APPROVAL WALLS ,4 ) 1 ALASKA FIREMARSHALL REVIEW: SUBMITTED: L� APPROVED: { CITY & STATE: ROOF I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION, THAT IT IS CORRECT AND THAT I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH ALL ORDINANCES AND LAWS REGULATING BUILDING CONSTRUCTION APPLICANT: TELEPHONE FINISH MATERIAL: ��, ' `� ROOF L STATE LICENSE EXTERIOR SIDING : - .ii/ APPROVED- BUILDING OFFICAL: - INTERIOR WALLS NOTES: 1ti (_1(Lbi 1 Se.6‘...V. 'A • d i it ._ 1 ypr� final , uS K.od" APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT AND CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANY - CITY OF KODIAK - KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH - BUILDING DEPARTMENT Telephone: 486 -8070 700 Mill Bay Road ES. PLEASE PRINT. USE A BALLPOINT PEN AND PRESS FIRMLY.) (OFFICE USE ONLY STREET ADDRESS: I Z //(4Q1k.). V./,4`i CLASS AND SCOPE OF WORK: SPECIFICATIONS: BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER: DATE OF APPLICATION: �/ 7 .� /e// c G g 2 r- ZONING COMPLIANCE : LOT : BLOCK : NEW ALTERATION DEMOLITION REPAIR FOUNDATION TYPE FOOTINGS STEM WALL CG1 PIERS DATE ISSUED: G . 9 /- /C 7 SUBDIVISION /SURVEY: 11 1_44.JD N - 2-E, ADDITION /C MOVE DIMENSIONS 1Z'r742 ,1t::)' VALUATION BASIS: BUILDING PERMIT FEE: 5 51, z S` PLAN CHECK FEE: DEPTH IN GRND DI--3 -DEf - /j%, ipQ R NAME: USE OF BUILDING AUTHORIZED BY THIS PERMIT: 5 � I!.}6 REINFORCEMENT S' --- VALUATION: ' �/�_ (IJ 42 'I- �,.�� -"A Ci i S BOLT SPACING 12'' 4 7 S`C), 7 Z 7' C • C/ / v1AILING ADDRESS: . �-C 2 `� CRAWL SPACE HEIGHT t-J /A INCHES OCCUPANCY GROUP: TOTAL FEE: CRAWL SPACE VENT 4- SQ. FEET A �/ E H 1 M R DIV. 1 2 3 (� 5 6 RECEIPT NO.: 29_ )1.2 '7 7 CITY & STATE: �-C� t7. 1- SIZEZ3'-8 x75 HEIGHT /97(:)'` NO. OF ROOMS STORIES STRUCTURAL SPECIES & GRADE SIZE SPACING SPAN EACH OF THE FOLLOWING STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION REQUIRES INSPECTION BE REQUESTED & COMPLETED PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH ANY FURTHER WORK: FOR INSPECTION CALL 486 -8070 TEL HO �((�� �y- 1- �c7--1•- 8 NO. OF FAMILIES GIRDERS TYPE OF BUSINESS ,a GIRDERS A C H /H0 NTELEPHONE G NAME: N0. OF BLOCS NOW ON LOT 1 JOISTS 1ST FLOOR ••' -1. 4ij 1i) L • USE OF EXISTING BLDG L F�1D JOISTS 1ST FLOOR TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION P 'V C'.J1CH E' SIZE OF LOT 2741 �TZ' JOISTS 2ND FLOOR I II III IV 1 -HR FR H.T. ,�,�� .-- F-Ur WATER: PUBLIC g PRIVATE JOISTS 2N0 FLOOR f �+ ' CITY & STATE: %� /-�5 SEWER: PUBLIC )( PRIVATE CEILING JOISTS k 12 -4-B4e to �� z — O INSULATION TYPE & THICKNESS: EXTERIOR WALLS 07::)1S-C-- EXCAVATION : I - 9 07 - 6g 1 - 10 1 1 11 FOUNDATION 1 �Q 7 BEARING WALLS 2"x10 "s es;vD �� 2'-0' UNDERGROUND UTILITIES INTERIOR WALLS DRIVEWAY PERMIT: FOUNDATION / SETBACKS STATE LICENSE : WALLS - 1 r-ii3:42.E6c.45.5 ROOF RAFTERS SUBMITTED �� FRAMING ROOF / CEILING ' -30- tniad.4 TRUSSES _ APPROVED / ROUGH ELECTRICAL li�, T R A NAME: G �G P `_ „ _ MAILING ADDRESS: SHEATHING TYPE & SIZE: FURNACE TYPE: 17/� ,ROUGH PLUMBING FLOOR �L�ilf+ ADEC APPLICATION: FINAL WOOD HEATER YES NO TYPE SUBMITTED / DATE C.O. ISSUED: WALLS 5/e, pLy GD>C FINAL APPROVAL CITY & STATE: „/ lU ROOF / ALASKA FIREMARSHALL REVIEW: /� cf a 7,c. •-r ci< / /' /, C'k C . of "2 , �< ! . SUBMITTED: '2 /2 /��/ APPROVED: / ��v7J !? / iY L j S� L�JEG� I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION, THAT IT IS CORRECT AND THAT I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH ALL ORDINANCES AND LAWS REGULATIIV17'B111LDING CONSTRU' APPLICANT: ...at (-. L 'a6EZ— C TELEPHONE : T �/ ( ` E S �' FINISH MATERIAL: R00F EXTERIOR SIDING I•/� '� �- APPROVED- BUILDING OFFICAL: t 192- RSTATE }ICENSE. 7/ k) �b INTERIOR WALLS PL '5 G. NOTES: }- ;i L'' e( --ket r 11- CIA ,Ala 1 \ Cy I i.-a c +,-;.- APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT AND CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANY - CITY OF KODIAK - KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH - BUILDING DEPARTMENT Telephone: 486 -8070 700 Mill Bay Road (APPLICANT TO FILL IN ALL INFORMATION WITHIN BOLD LINES. PLEASE PRINT USE A BALLPOINT PEN AND PRESS FIRMLY.) (OFFICE USE ONLY) STREET ADDRESS: LOT : BLOCK : CLASS AND SCOPE OF WORK: SPECIFICATIONS: BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER: DATE OF APPLICATION: NEW DEMOLITION FOUNDATION FOOTINGS STEM WALL PIERS ZONING COMPLIANCE : DATE ISSUED: ALTERATION REPAIR TYPE SUBDIVISION / SURVEY: ADDITION MOVE DIMENSIONS VALUATION BASIS: BUILDING PERMIT FEE: DEPTH IN GRND O E R NAME: USE OF BUILDING AUTHORIZED BY THIS PERMIT: . -- r- A, - ..- �y -,;,- „ 4-{" .. 11� ..5, REINFORCEMENT VALE U A T� PLAN CHECK FEE: BOLT SPACING MAILING ADDRESS: CRAWL SPACE HEIGHT INCHES OCCUPANCY GROUP: TOTAL FEE: A B E H I M R DIV. 1 2 3 4 5 6 CRAWL SPACE VENT SQ. FEET RECEIPT NO.: CITY & STATE: SIZE 75 HEIGHT / STRUCTURAL SPECIES & GRADE SIZE SPACING SPAN EACH OF THE FOLLOWING STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION REQUIRES INSPECTION BE REQUESTED & COMPLETED PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH ANY FURTHER WORK: FOR INSPECTION CALL 486 -8070 NO. OF ROOMS 1 STORIES I TELEPHONE : NO. OF FAMILIES GIRDERS TYPE OF BUSINESS GIRDERS A R C H / E N G NAME: NO. OF BLDGS NOW ON LOT JOISTS 1ST FLOOR USE OF EXISTING BLDGS SIZE OF LOT ~ JOISTS 1ST FLOOR TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION JOISTS 2ND FLOOR I 11 111 IV V N 1 -HR FR H.T. WATER: PUBLIC PRIVATE JOISTS 2ND FLOOR CITY & STATE: SEWER: PUBLIC PRIVATE CEILING JOISTS EXCAVATION INSULATION TYPE & THICKNESS: EXTERIOR WALLS TELEPHONE : FOUNDATION BEARING WALLS UNDERGROUND UTILITIES INTERIOR WALLS DRIVEWAY PERMIT: FOUNDATION / SETBACKS SUBMITTED FRAMING STATE LICENSE : WALLS ROOF RAFTERS ROOF / CEILING TRUSSES APPROVED ROUGH ELECTRICAL ROUGH PLUMBING Iii T R A C 1 R NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: SHEATHING TYPE & SIZE: FURNACE TYPE: ADEC APPLICATION: FINAL FLOOR SUBMITTED DATE C.O. ISSUED: WOOD HEATER YES NO TYPE FINAL APPROVAL WALLS ALASKA FIREMARSHALL REVIEW: SUBMITTED: APPROVED: CITY & STATE: ROOF I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION, THAT IT IS CORRECT AND THAT I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH ALL ORDINANCES AND LAWS REGULATING BUILDING CONSTRUCTION APPLICANT: TELEPHONE : FINISH MATERIAL: ROOF APPROVED— BUILDING OFFICAL: STATE LICENSE : EXTERIOR SIDING INTERIOR WALLS NOTES: '10 Mill Bay Road (Rm 204), Kodiak, Alaska 9961 5 - 6340 - Phone: (907) 486 -5736, ext. 255 or 254 L U N I N C. C. U M N L I A N (_ h FERMI 1 Permit #: I D :}-- I. Property Owner / A licant: f.rse01 10 A, A.... • Number and size of parking spaces required (onsite identification of parking spaces is required quired - Yes: j� N o: pp ., "•0•W)( `` -t.t' 0 V7 SZ / oo (`�- (I T. 64 0 tSEAR:: Mailin Address: 2997 DV-t- Phone. ? g off--- s � 5i9 +°x Off-street loading requirement: 2d /- A- !. Leg al Description: "-TrrEL--1--)b }ACT N - Street Address: GI 2 /•/mac ] 1.4L- \J/_( Tax Code #: Plat related requirements (e.g., plat notes, easements, subdivision conditions, etc.): ;. Description of Existing Property/currentzoning: t {J'pUSSP_.! A -L_... ,0 / Minimum Required Lot Area: 1i _D7 c DZ) )4 Width: 5 J ) %�� Other requirements (e.g., zero lot line, additional setbacks, projections into yards, screening, etc.): 1C-/ /- n Actual Lot Area: 2- �4�413 (Z ( ±3 Width: �,-z v �s `c _ Minimum Required Setbacks: Sides: A) Y `t ✓S� .0 /�J Rear: IQ (1 Coastal Management Program Applicable Polices (check appropriate category) - Residential: Business: T I Maximum Building Height: 1( l�< {4C1-1\1r-TV ��2�� S. Y Industrial: Other (list): Is the proposed action consistent with the KIB Coastal Management Program? - Yes: No: Use lot: � ��� 'O and size of existing structures on the /∎I Ss 1�JV 1 t..PbI i It _ t40 pT If the proposed action conflicts with the Coastal Management Program policies, attach a sheet that notes the poiicv(ies), describes the contlict(s), and specifies conditions to mitigate the conflict(s). Attachment - Yes: No:_ . . Description of proposed action (attach site plan): � =C 1 rCpf )()-- El-- o « ----bt cDy' .. I p G r S' -re-_) ... ; b ? --I — al , BOA bio. • moo ..E Vv I i l_. N 1-1N _ I� aik C . 1 _ S . .- • f_ 4 2' ve 2 176 4 1 1. •pplicant Certification: I hereby certify that I will comply with the provisions of the Kodiak Island Borough Code and that I have the authority to certify this as the property owner, or as a representative of the property owner. to have identifiable c markers in in place in the field for verification of setbacks. �����, �y� �' 1 L• P N L 2 By'—C g -�t�L� T --, Date: VD '\ 1 1 Title: (1424-L Supporting documents attached (check): Site plan:_ , • 'It survey: / Other (list): Community Development staff for zoning, by: '� Date: ,Z // 7 Tide: d-S1-5-0 Gtr � / l e £N Fire Chief ]Gty of Kodiak, Fire District #1 (Bayside), Womens Bay Fire District] approval for UFC (Sections 10.207 and 10.301Q by: Date: Driveway Permit (state, City of Kodiak, Borough) issued by: Date: 9. Septic system PLAN approved by: Date: bution: File /Building Official /ApplicantTHIS FORM DOES NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION WHEN A BUILDING PERMIT IS REQUIRED lune 1991 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH Community Development 710 Mill Bay Road (Rm 204), Kodiak, Alaska 99615 -6340 - Phone: (907) 486 -5736, ext. 255 or 254 ZONING COMPLIANCE PERMIT Permit #: c 1. Property Owner /Applicant: / h w -6-(v'• -+,. f �e.,.t Js Number and size of parking spaces required (onsite identification of parking spaces is required - Yes: / No: ) • / Mailing Address: O. &te X97 I\re(ov t+1 /4 V Phone: '70`1 V 86- `/ 76 z _ — -v...>...... 1 %7 %}L . /% %� //��_ Off- street loading requirement: /l/c2 C 1-t --,.1., , a-. --C- g � 1 -r,+-4, e — / b /4 P . Legal Description: & J-e �•c Plat related requirements (e.g., plat notes, easements, subdivision conditions, etc.): Street Address: 7 /7 - 7 T!? A 1.1P/1 R U Tax Code #: I I c )Oc) 03 5b f 3. Description of Existing Propertyicurrentzoning: 1,, ,).- s-f-,«., f /✓1 Minimum Required Lot Area: cJ if Width: 7S Other requirements (e.g., zero lot line, additional setbacks, projections into yards, screening, etc.): i Actual Lot Area: �?• 9 % � Width: 16o // r C ko c � 'l�w�'c,+�, LS .,'. -. i �,'7"e..Le ( � ��- r �7J+,s � r S , Minimum Required Setbacks: Sides: J bey` Mt R- ,,..,, (° if `"t 1/ i���'Se e Iare ` he""'' 5L,,'T4' .SIZt -__,.) 1,44„....i, 0.e c,, , Coastal Management Program Applicable Polices (check appropriate category) - Residential: Business: yam' �lfvrv,n� •nt: Rear: Y V e sl I c red Maximum Building Height: L) ,-. - Industrial: )1 Other (list): �/ Is the proposed action consistent with the KIB Coastal Management Program? - Yes: 1l No: Use and size of existing structures on the lot: 1 3,1 x 3,. k 1 3 ' (,J.,. -e L, -ye_ ,-/ 7, acie) If the proposed action conflicts with the Coastal Management Program policies, attach a sheet that notes the policy(ies), describes the conflict(s), and specifies conditions to mitigate the conflict(s). Attachment - Yes: No: X t I I o Y /b Y )3 ' °Pfrc e 4. Description of proposed action (attach site plan): 3� X 6 { 3f e rfesl),-. S. •rplicant Certification: I hereby certify that 1 will comply with the provisions of the Kodiak Island Borough Code and that I have the authority to certify this as the property owner, or as a representative of the property owner. /� /�{' `+ I a: to ve identifiable com ma . rs in place in the field for verification of setbacks. ,N ..∎jIQ -1 L .. , ., m o m / Date: 1 3 - ■i — 1141, ( Title: 6 f `4V4-%J/A-6 _ By: - documents (check): Site As -built survey: Other (list):_ Supporting attached plan: / q _ / / 6. Community Development for zoning, by: Ii.I i j Date: /�`J {I/C3✓ cil Title: staff i 7. Fire Chief Kodiak, Fire District #1 (Bayside), Womens Bay Fire District] approval for UFC (Sections 10.207 and 10.101Q by: Date: \ [Gty of 8. Driveway Permit City Kodiak, Borough) issued by: Date: 9. Septic system PLAN approved by: Date: (state, of istribution File /Building Official /ApplicantTHIS FORM DOES NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION WHEN A BUILDING PERMIT IS REQUIRED lune 1991 I 1.-12 p se_c] e4e 4,6 S °II '--1 V vi cj 4,306 1. AL 5' $ 1,•0P' Y., Al. kW 4d 01 A th 1,-1y)) cxr4v-1:10-1.1. OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR OFFICE OF MA. NAGEMENT AND BUDGET DIVISION OF GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION SOUTHCENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE 3601 "C "- Street SUITE 370 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503 -2798 PHONE: (907) 561 -6131 FAX: (907) 561 -6134 Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested CENTRAL OFFICE P.O. BOX AW JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811 -0165 PHONE: (907) 465 -3562 FAX: (907) 465 -3075 WALTER J. HICKEL, GOVERNOR NORTHERN REGIONAL OFFICE 675 SEVENTH AVENUE STATION H - FAIRBANKS, ALASKA 99701 -4596 PHONE: (907) 451 -2818 FAX: (907) 451 -2814 October 22, 1991 International Seafoods of Alaska, Inc. P.O. Box 2997 Kodiak, AK 99615 Attention: Mr'. David Rogers Dear Mr. Rogers: SUBJECT: CONCLUSIVE CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION INTERNATIONAL SEAFOODS OF ALASKA, INC. NPDES PUBLIC NOTICE NO. AK- 000035 -3 STATE I.D. NUMBER AK910827 -19A The Division of Governmental Coordination (DGC) has completed coordinating the state's review of`.your project for consistency with the Alaska Coastal Management Program.(ACMP). On October 7, 1991 you were issued a proposed consistency finding. The project to reissue the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit to discharge process wastewater from the Alkod seafood processor into St. Paul Harbor and Near Island Channel. The project entails the discharge-of up to 154,000 gallons per day of wastewater from the processing of bottomfish, halibut and salmon to St. Paul Harbor. According to the Draft NPDES permit for this processor, the treatment of the wastewater . prior to discharge shall be accomplished through the use of fine mesh (1 millimeter) screening or equivalent technology. Seafood wastes shall not be pulverized, chopped, ground, or otherwise altered prior to screening. This conclusive consistency determination, developed under 6 AAC 50, applies to the following state and federal authorizations. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. AGENCY NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM ( NPDES) PERMIT NO. AK- 000035 -3 Mr. Rogers 2 International Seafoods of AK, Inc. AK910827 -19A October 22, 1991 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION SECTION 401 CERTIFICATE OF REASONABLE ASSURANCE Based on the review of your project by the Alaska Departments of Natural Resources, Environmental Conservation, and Fish and Game, and the , the state concurs with your certification that the project is consistent with the ACMP provided the following conditions are met: 1. Part I.A.3.d shall be added and read as follows: Monitoring results for process wastewater shall be reported on the .monthly Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs). as both pollutant concentrations (mg /1) and loading values (lbs. pollutant per 1,000 lbs. raw product). 2. Part I.A.4. shall be changed to require receiving water inspections to be conducted on a daily basis instead of weekly. :These stipulations will appear on the Section 401 Certificate of Reasonable Assurance to be issued by DEC. These stipulations are necessary to ensure the proposed activity is consistent with the Air, Land, and Water Quality Standards of the ACMP (6 AAC 80.140). Copies of the pertinent ACMP Standards are enclosed. This conclusive consistency determination' represents a consensus reached between you as the project applicant and the reviewing agencies listed above, s provided for under G AAC 50.070(k). As -" also provided under 15 CFR 930.64(c), federal authorization of your project will be made with the full understanding that your original project proposal has been modified subject to the conditions described above. If changes to the approved project are proposed prior to or during its siting, construction, or operation, you are required to contact this office immediately to determine if further review and approval of the revised project is necessary. The state reserves the right to enforce compliance with this conclusive consistency determination if the project is changed in any significant way, or if the actual use differs from the approved use contained in the project description. If appropriate, the state may amend the state approvals listed in this conclusive consistency determination. By a copy of this letter we are informing the US Army Corps of Engineers of our determination. Mr. Rogers 3 October 22, 1991 International Seafoods of AK, Inc. AK910827 -19A Please be advised that although the State has found your project consistent with the ACMP, based on your project description and any stipulations contained herein, you are still required to meet all applicable State and federal laws and regulations. Your consistency determination may include reference to specific laws and regulations, but this in no way precludes your responsibility to comply with other applicable laws and regulations. If you have questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 561 -6131. Sincerely, Elizabeth A. Benson Project Review Coordinator Enclosure cc: Distribution List Harold Geren, EPA, Seattle OFFICE OF .THE GOVERNOR OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET DIVISION OF GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION SOUTHCENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE 3601 "C" Street SUITE 370 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503-2798 PHONE: (907) 561-6131 FAX: (907) 561-6134 Certified Mail • Return Receipt . Requested CENTRAL OFFICE P.O. BOX AW JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811-0165 PHONE: (907) 465-3562 FAX: (907) 465-3075 WALTER J. NICKEL, GOVERNOR NORTHERN REGIONAL OFFICE 675 SEVENTH AVENUE STATION H FAIRBANKS, ALASKA 99701-4596 PHONE: (907) 451-2818 . FAX: (907) 451-2814 October 22, 1991 International Seafoods of Alaska, Inc. P.O. Box 2997 Kodiak, AK 99615 Attention: Mr. David Rogers Dear Mr. Rogers: SUBJECT: CONCLUSIVE CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION INTERNATIONAL SEAFOODS OF ALASKA, INC. NPDES PUBLIC NOTICE NO. AK-002666-2 STATE I.D. NUMBER AK910827-18A The Division of Governmental Coordination (DGC) has completed coordinating the state's review of your project for consistency with the Alaska Coastal Management Program (ACMP). On October 7, 1991 you were issued a proposed consistency finding. The project to reissue the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit to discharge process wastewater from the Alkod seafood processor into St.. Paul Harbor and Near Island Channel. This conclusive consistency determination, developed under 6 AAC 50, applies to the following state and federal authorizations. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT NO. AK-002666-2 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION SECTION 401 CERTIFICATE OF REASONABLE ASSURANCE Based on the review of your project by the Alaska Departments of Natural Resources, Environmental Conservation, and Fish and Game, and the Kodiak Island Borough, the state concurs with your certification that the project is consistent with the ACMP provided the following conditions are met: Mr. Rogers 2 International Seafoods of AK, Inc. AK910827 -18A October 22, 1991 1. Part I.A.3.d shall be added and read as follows: Monitoring results for process wastewater shall be reported on the monthly Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) as both pollutant concentrations (mg /1) and loading values (lbs. pollutant per 1,000 lbs. raw product). 2. Part I.A.4. shall be changed to require receiving water inspections to be conducted on a daily basis instead of weekly. These stipulations will appear on the Section 401 Certificate of Reasonable Assurance to be issued by DEC. These stipulations are necessary to ensure the proposed activity is consistent with the Air, Land, and Water Quality Standards of the ACMP (6 AAC 80.140). Copies of the pertinent ACMP Standards are enclosed. This . conclusive consistency determination represents a consensus reached between you as the project applicant and the reviewing agencies listed above, as provided for under 6 AAC 50.070(k). As also provided under 15 CFR 930.64(c), federal authorization of your project will be made with the full understanding that your original project proposal has been modified subject to the conditions described above. If changes to the approved project are proposed prior to or during its siting, construction, or operation, you are required to contact this office immediately to determine if further review and approval of the revised project is necessary. The state reserves the right to enforce compliance with this conclusive consistency determination if the project is changed in any significant way, or if 'the actual use differs from the approved use contained in the project description. If appropriate, the state may amend the state approval listed in this conclusive consistency determination. By a copy of this letter we are informing the US Army Corps of Engineers of our determination. Please be advised that although the State has found your project consistent with the ACMP, based on your project description and any stipulations contained herein, you are still required to meet all applicable State and federal laws and regulations. Your consistency determination may include reference to specific laws Mr. Rogers 3 International Seafoods of AK, Inc. AK910827-18A October 22, 1991 and regulations, but this in no way precludes your responsibility to comply with other applicable laws and regulations. If you have questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 561-6131. Sincerely, Elizabeth A. Benson Project Review Coordinator Enclosure cc: Distribution List Harold Geren, EPA, Seattle r-1 f { { r g OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET 1 j' DIVISION OF GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION SOUTHCENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE 3601 "C" Street SUITE 370 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503 -2798 PHONE: (907) 561 -6131 FAX: (907) 561 -6134 Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested V CENTRAL OFFICE P.O. BOX AW JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811 -0165 PHONE: (907) 465 -3562 FAX: (907) 465 -3075 'October 7, WALTER J. HICKEL, GOVERNOR NORTHERN REGIONAL OFFICE . 675 SEVENTH AVENUE STATION H FAIRBANKS, ALASKA 99701 -4596 PHONE: (907) 451 -2818 FAX: (907) 451 -2814 1991 L. International Seafoods of Alaska, Inc. P.O. Box 2997 Kodiak, AK 99615 Attention: Mr. David Rogers Dear Mr. Rogers: SUBJECT: PROPOSED CONSISTENCY FINDING INTERNATIONAL'SEAFOODS'OF ALASKA, INC. NPDES PUBLIC NOTICE -NO:-AK--002-666 • STATE I.D.. NUMBER AK910827 -18A The Division of Governmental Coordination (DGC) is currently coordinating the state's review of your project for consistency with the Alaska Coastal Management Program (ACMP) and has developed this proposed consistency finding based on reviewers' comments. The project to reissue the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit to discharge process wastewater from the Alkod seafood processor into St. Paul Harbor and Near Island Channel. The project entails the discharge of up to 124,000 gallons per day of wastewater from the processing of bottomfish, halibut, and salmon to Near Island Channel. According to the Draft NPDES permit for this processor, the treatment of the wastewater prior to discharge shall be accomplished through the use of fine mesh (1 millimeter) screening or equivalent technology. Seafood wastes shall not be pulverized, chopped, ground, or otherwise altered prior to screening. This proposed consistency finding, developed under 6 AAC 50, applies to the following state and federal authorizations. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT NO. AK- 002666 -2 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION SECTION 401 CERTIFICATE. OF REASONABLE ASSURANCE Mr. Rogers 2 October 7, 1991 STATE I.D. NO.AK910827-18A Based on the review of your project by the Alaska Departments of Natural Resources, Environmental Conservation, and Fish and Game, and the Kodiak Island Borough, the state concurs with your certification that the project is consistent with the ACMP provided the following conditions are met: 1.. Part I.A.3.d shall be added and read as follows: Monitoring results for process wastewater shall be reported on ,the monthly Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) as bath pollutant concentrations (mg/1) and loading values (lbs. pollutant per 1,000 lbs.. raw product). 2. Part I.A.4. shall be changed to require, receiving water inspections to be conducted on a daily basis instead of weekly. These stipulations will appear on the Section 401 Certificate of Reasonable Assurance to be issued by DEC. These stipulations are necessary to ensure the proposed activity is consistent with the Air, Land, and Water Quality Standards of the ACMP (6 AAC 80.140). Copies of the pertinent ACMP Standards are enclosed. Please contact me within five days of your receipt of this proposed finding to indicate whether or not you concur with this finding. If you are not prepared to concur within the five-day period, you may either: . (a) request an extension of the review schedule, if you need more time to consider this finding, or (b) request that the state reconsider this finding, by submitting a written statement requesting "elevation" of the finding, describing your concerns, and proposing as alternative consistency finding, This alternative finding must demonstrate how your project is consistent with the referenced standards of the ACMP and district policies without the stipulations included in this proposed finding. If I do not receive your request for extension or an elevation statement from you, or any other reviewing party with elevation rights as per 6 AAC 50.070(j), within five days of receipt of this letter, this proposed finding will be issued as a final conclusive consistency determination. By copy of this letter, we are informing the Environmental Protection Agency of our proposed finding. Please be advised that although the State has found your Project Mr. Rogers 3 October 7, 1991. STATE I.D. NO.AK910827-18A consistent with the ACMP, based on your project description and any stipulations contained herein, you are still required to meet all applicable State and federal laws and regulations. Your consistency determination may include reference to specific laws and regulations, but this in no way precludes your responsibility to comply with other applicable laws and regulations. If you have questions regarding this process, please contact me at 561-6131. Elizabeth A. Benson Project Review Coordinator Enclosure cc: Distribution List Harold Geren, EPA, Seattle A KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH October 7, 1991 DISTRIBUTION LIST Ms. Judith Bittner, Department of•Natural Resources, Division of Parks, Anchorage Tom Brooks; Manager, Civil Engineernq Alaska Railroad" Corporation, Anchorage Ms. Veronica Gilbert, Department of Natural Resources, Anchorage Mr. Pete Panarese, Department of Natural Resources, Anchorage "Ms. Carol Sanner, Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, Anchorage Ms. Elaine Pistoresi, Department of Environmental Conservation, Anchorage ' Mr. Lance Trasky, Department of Fish and Game, Anchorage Ms. Linda Freed, Kodiak Island Borough Mr. Uwe L. Gross, Koniag Inc., Anchorage Mr. Gordon Puller, Kodiak Arera Native Association, Kodiak The Honorable Jerome Selby, Mayor of Kodiak SME OF USN[ OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET DIVISION OF GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION SOUTHCENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE 3601 "C" Street SUITE 370 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503-2798 PHONE: (907) 561-6131 FAX: (907) 561-6134 Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested CENTRAL OFFICE P.O. BOX AW JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811-0165 PHONE: (907) 465-3562 • FAX: (907) 465-3075 International Seafoods of Alaska, P.O. Box 2997 Kodiak, AK 99615 Attention: Mr. David Rogers Dear Mr. Rogers: October 7, Inc. WALTER J. NICKEL, GOVERNOR NORTHERN REGIONAL OFFICE 675 SEVENTH AVENUE STATION H FAIRBANKS, ALASKA 99701-4596 PHONE: (907) 451-2818 FAX: (907) 451-2814 1991 SUBJECT: PROPOSED CONSISTENCY FINDING INTERNATIONAL SEAFOODS OF ALASKA, INC. NPDES-PUBLIC-NOTICE-NOT-AK=.000035-3-i STATE I.D. NUMBER AK910827-19A The Division of GovernMental Coordination (DGC) is currently • coordinating the state's review of your. project for consistency • with the Alaska..Coastal Management Program (ACMP) and has developed this proposed consistency finding based on reviewers' comments. The project to reissue the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). permit to discharge process wastewater from the *Alkod seafood processor into St. Paul Harbor and Near Island Channel. The project entails the discharge of of to 154,000 gallons per day of wastewater from the processing of bottomfish, halibut and .salmon to St. Paul Harbor. According to the Draft • NPDES permit for. this processor, the treatment of the wastewater prior to discharge shall be accomplished through the use of fine mesh (1 millimeter) screening or equivalent technology. Seafood wastes shall not be pulverized, chopped, ground, or otherwise altered prior to screening. This proposed consistency 'finding, developed under 6 AAC 50, applies'to the following state and federal authorizations. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. AGENCY NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT NO AK-000035-3 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION SECTION 401 CERTIFICATE OF REASONABLE ASSURANCE 1 Mr. Rogers 2 October 7, 1991 STATE I.D. NO.AK910827 -19A Based on the review . of your project by the Alaska Departments of Natural Resources, Environmental Conservation, and Fish and Game, and the , the state concurs with your certification that the project is consistent with the ACMP provided the following conditions are met: 1. Part I.A.3.d shall be added and read as follows: Monitoring results for .process wastewater shall be reported on the monthly Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) as bath pollutant concentrations (mg /1) and loading values (lbs. pollutant per 1,000 lbs. raw product). 2. Part I.A.4. shall be changed to require receiving water inspections to be conducted on a daily basis instead of weekly. These stipulations will appear on the Section 401. Certificate of Reasonable Assurance to be issued by DEC.. These stipulations are necessary to ensure, the proposed activity is consistent with the Air, Land, and Water Quality Standards of. the ACMP (6 AAC 80.140). Copies of the pertinent ACMP Standards are enclosed. Please contact me within five days . of your receipt of this proposed finding to indicate whether or not you.concur with this finding. If you are not prepared to concur within the five -day period, you may either: (a) request an extension of the review schedule, if you need more time to consider this finding, or (b) request that the state reconsider this finding, by submitting a written statement requesting "elevation" of the finding, describing your concerns, and proposing as alternative consistency finding, This alternative finding must demonstrate how your project is consistent with the referenced standards of the ACMP and district policies without the stipulations included in this proposed finding. If I. do not receive your request for extension or an elevation statement from you, or any other reviewing party with elevation rights as per 6 AAC 50.070(j), within five days of receipt of this letter, this proposed finding will be issued as a final conclusive consistency determination. By copy of this letter, we are informing the Environmental Protection Agency of our proposed finding. Please be advised that although the State has found your project • Mr. Rogers 3 October 7, 1991 STATE I.D. NO.AK910627-19A consistent with the ACMP, based on your project description and any stipulations contained herein, you are still required to meet all applicable State and federal laws and regulations. Your consistency determination may include reference to specific laws and regulations, but this in no way precludes your responsibility to comply with other applicable laws and regulations. If you have questions regarding this process, please contact me at 561-6131. Sincerely, Elizabeth A. Benson Project Review Coordinator Enclosure cc: Distribution List Harold Geren, EPA, Seattle ti KODIAK'ISLAND BOROUGH October 7, 1991 DISTRIBUTION LIST -Ns. Judith Bittner, Department of Natural Resources,.Division of Parks, Anchorage Mr. Tom Brooks, Manager, Civil Engineerng Alaska Railroad Corporation, Anchorage Ms, Veronica Gilbert,, Department of Natural Resources, Anchorage Mr. Pete Panarese, Department of Naturat Resources, Anchorage ' Ms. Carol Sanner, Department .of Transportation and Public Facilities, Anchorage Ms. Elaine Pistoresi, Department of Environmental Conservation, Anchorage Mr. Lance Trasky, Department of Fish and Game, Anchorage Ms. Linda Freed, Kodiak Island Borough Mr. Uwe L. Gross, Koniag Inc., Anchorage Mr. Gordon Putter, Kodiak Arera Native Association, Kodiak The Honorable Jerome Selby, Mayor of Kodiak 1VLEMORA1TIVI TO: Elizabeth Benson. Project Review Coordinator Division of Governmental Coordination Office of Management and Budget • FROM: C. Wayne Dole al Habitat Biologist Region 11 Habitat Division Department of Fish and Game State t,,A) Alaska Department of Fish and Game DATE: October 2:, 1991 'FILE NO: TELEPHONE NO: 267-2284 SUBJECT: Internationa-l-S-e-dfoods AK-000035-3 Seafood Process Waste Discharge SID AK910827-19A The Alaska Department of Fish and Game has reviewed the wastewater discharge permit application referenced above: The project entails the discharge of up to 154,000 gallons per day of wastewater from the processing of bottomfish, halibut, and salmon to St. Paul Harbor. We understand that treatment of the wastewater prior to discharge shall be accomplished through the use of fine mesh (1 millimeter) screening or equivalent technology. Further,, seafood wastes shall not be pulverized, chopped, ground or otherwise altered prior to screening. We have no objection to the project as proposed. Pursuant to 6 AAC 80.010(b), the ADF&G recommends that this project be found consistent with the Standards of the Alaska Coastal Management Program and the Kodiak Island Borough Coastal Management Program. We appreciate the opportunity to comment. If you have any specific questions, please contact me at 267-2333. cc: D. Kohler, COE R. Dolan, DEC J. Jett, DNR/DL P. Probasco, ADF&G L. Schwarz, ADF&G L. White, ADF&G D. McGillivary, USFWS P. North, EPA B. Smith, NMFS L. Freed, Kodiak Island Borough ATEMORA1N.„4 TO: Elizabeth Benson. Project Review Coordinator Division of Governmental Coordination Office of Management and Budget FROM: C. Way he Dolezal Habitat Biologist Region II Habitat Division Department of Fish and Game State L_ Alaska Department of Fish and Game DATE: October 2, 1991 FILE NO: •TELEPHONE NO: 267-2284. . SUBJECT: International-Sea-foods sk-dP NPDES Permit No. • AK-002666-2 • Seafood Process Waste Discharge SID AK910827-18A The Alaska Department of Fish and Game has reviewed the wastewater discharge permit application referenced above. The project entails the discharge of up to 124,000 gallons per day of wastewater from the processing of bottomfish, halibut, and salmon to Near Island Channel. We understand that treatment of the wastewater prior to discharge shall be accomplished through the use of fine mesh (1 millimeter) screening or equivalent technology. Further, seafood wastes shall not be pulverized, chopped, ground or otherwise altered prior to screening. We have no objection to the project as proposed. Pursuant to 6 AAC 80.010(b), • the ADF&G recommends that this project be found consistent with the Standards of the Alaska Coastal Management Program and the Kodiak Island Borough Coastal Management Program. We appreciate the opportunity to comment. If you have any specific questions, please contact me at 267-2333. cc: D. Kohler, COE R. Dolan, DEC J. Jett, DNR/DL P. Probasco, ADF&G L. Schwarz, ADF&G L. White, ADF&G D. McGillivary, USFWS P. North, EPA B. Smith, NMFS L. Freed, Kodiak Island Borough Kodiak Island Borough Elizabeth Benson, Project Coordinator OMB-DGC Southcentral Regional Office 3601 C Street, Suite 370 Anchorage, AK 99503 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 September 22, 1991 RE: SID AK 910827-19A - Inernational Seafoods of Alaska NPDES AK-000035-3 Dear Ms. Benson: The Kodiak Island Borough has reviewed the seafood processing facility discharge permit referenced above. We support the issuance of the permit as long as state water quality standards are met. For the record, the Kodiak Island Borough does not have the expertise to review the technical aspects of the permit. Seafood processing is a significant contributor to economic activity in the Kodiak Island Borough. Based on our limited review of the permit application, the Kodiak Island Borough recommends that this permit be found consistent with the Kodiak Island Borough Coastal Management Program (KIBCMP) and the Alaska Coastal Management Program (ACMP). If you have any questions about these comments, please call me. Sincerely, Linda Freed, Director Community Development Department cc: W. Dolezal, ADF&G V. Gilbert, ADNR B. Lamoreaux, ADEC David Rogers, International Seafoods of Alaska Ray Camardella, KIB Engineering/Facilities Dept. PROJECT 1 3F LtMLA OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET DIVISION OF GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION IMOIECTINEIRMAnottmEEI J. soumHCeNTRM. REGION& 0 3601t" STREET SUITE 37D ANCHORAGE. ALASKA 99603,61 PHONE (9171) 561.6131 DGC CONTACT: - APPLICANT/PROPONENT: _r/f f ,/7td 1'd DIRECT FEDERAL ACTION: YES___ NO_44 REVIEW TYPE: CONSISTENCYV/ ANILCA ACTIVITY TYPE: ARMED FORCES COMMERCIAL LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN MINING: HARDROCS PLACER OFFSHORE OIL dt GAS PUBLIC UTILITIES/FACILITIES PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL FILL PLACEMENT„, FLOATING. STRUCTURES PROJECT LOCA N: Nearest Coastal District Project. Inside the District Boundary Yes No District Plan Approved Yes v No REVIEW Day 1, S ri kv- 2'1 ! 199 ( Reviewer Requfor Add'1 Info .la 0. a 3 1991 C o m m e n t s Due T o DGC ( ( - ) a a I 1191 Notification To Applicant c+, ! l/ 1/9 9 Decision Deadline ()Q+. 3 I q 9 tc_a Agent Phone OCSLA NEPA . FISHERIES PRODUCTION: GENERAL. HATCHERY PR IN©,�1� d AQUA T�C FARMS: SHELLFISH AQUATIC PLANTS HYDRO POWER TIMBER OTHER elietk rh.J feroet 15 DAY 30 DAY 50 DAY_.,, OTIM Coastal Project Questionaire and Certification Statement Please answer all question& To avoid a delay in processing, please call the agency if you answer "yes' to any of the questions related to thee deparesient. Includernaps or plan drawing with your packet. Ais frooltorlete questionnaire may be returned and will delay the miens of your packet. • APPLICANT Ir■IFORMATION 1. rtoJL EA1ODD6a Paratt.0- 41).APriYA .2=397 ey,ODIFiK 14-4( cur zip Cads 0 921.11g6 —14760 kit 5 Zci 7 4\1 1Jpee •ht: • 7 6 MANA T& BUDGE 2.)1a6 ___ JAN 1 4 1991 • PROJECT INFORMATION GOVERNMENTAL 1. Provide a brief description of your entire project and ALLassodated facilities (caretaker f..t.9 INA disposal sites, etc) rt.-LS /4- t PROCE.%iNG- PCM4 1" iNVeLUE.1) c:RE E.2 11J L-S ;a117) L b41. id • (NI ob. sa • 0.1 ENC.5 pc- 13ortotstiSii totlior)* 6/41../4 — INSatkggf (NIG- tAlwri-e (MIA-SR. TIO 1. Sr. 'PAO WRADV Starting date for project Ending date for project tric-, • PROJECT LOCATION 1. Please give location of project (include nearest community or identifiable body 'of land or water): ,vt F -44(0 Al/ — kzaDt c-( T Y . Township Range Meidtan Season Aliquot Parts Ukt •M'aP'" "-- 2. The project is on: CI State land 0 Federal land tfPrivate land 0 Municipal land 3. The project is located in which region (see attached map): liNorthern 0 Southcentral 0 Southeast II CURRENT APPROVALS Yes 1. Do you currently have any State or federal approvals for this project? Note: Approval mesas permit or any other form of authorization. If "yes," please list below. APPROVAL Twit APPROVAL ExPIAATION DATE STATE REVIEW ID,. No N/P9 5 A-V. --Gee° 3c- ?iv cescr; te‘k 0 0 0 0 3 's II FEDERAL APPROVALS 1. Will you be placing structures or fills in any of the following: tidal (ocean) waters, streams, lakes or wetlands*? If you are not certain whether your proposed protect is in a wetland, contact the U.S. Corps of Engineers, Regulatory BMW! at (907) 733-2720 for a wetlands determination (outside the Anchorage arm call toll free I-800478-2711) If yes, have you applied for or do you intend to apply, for a U.S. AF7 Corps of Engineers (COE) .permit? If "yes," give date of submittal. /T i 2. Have you applied for, or do you intend to apply for, a US. Environmental Protection Agency National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit? (Note For information regarding the need for a NPDES permit, contact EPA at (907) 271- 5083.) Please indicate at right and give date of submittal: 27 I ►a 9,0 3. Have you applied foe, or do you intend to apply for, permits from any other "federal agency? If "yes,' pines list below. Mesa Ys No Yea No El S21 APPROVAL TYR DAT! SMUT= (of trait tD To sust►ar) • DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES APPROVALS 1.. Is the proposed project on State -owned land or will you need to cross State lands for access? Noes fn addition to State-mud uplands. the Stag has jurisdiction cow most land blow dw ordinary high =or line of straws, ruins, lakes, and stoat high tide line saserod for three nol . 2. Is any portion of your project placed below the ordinary high water line of a stream, river, lake or mean high water line of a saltwater body? 3. Will you be dredging? If yes, location of dredging is: Township Range Meridian Sevin& Location of disposal site for dredged materials (describe): Township Range Meridian , Seetlon 4. Will you be filling with rock, sand, or gravel? If "yes," amount. Location of source: Township Range Meridian Location of fill site Township Range M Section 5. Do you plan to use any of the following State - owned' resources: ■ Timber Will you be harvesting timber from 10 or more acres? If "yes," amount Location of source: Township Range • Other materials? If "yes," what material' Location of source: Township a V a 7„,/ • •-'J Meridian+ Sotto (peat budding stone. nit. overburden. am) Range • Moldiest Sotto 6. Are you planning to use any fresh water? If "yes," amount (gallons per day): 0,1‘, /f) Source: 7. Will you be building or altering a dam? 8. Do you plan to drill a geothermal well? 9. Will you be exploring for or extracting coal? 10. Will you be exploring for or extracting minerals on State -owned land? 1.1. Will you be exploring for or extracting oil and gas on State - owned land? AK- 000035 • 110 M(LI.3 -L-- 3y�1 M E" 0 12. Will you be investigating.or removing historical or archaeological resources on State- owned land? 13. Will the project be located in a unit of the Alaska State Park System? If you answered NO to ALL questions is this sectiOn, you do not need an approval from the Alaska Department of Natural Resources (DNR). Continue to next section. If you answered °Yee' to ANY questions' in this section, contact DNR to identify and obtain necessity -application forms. Based on your discussion with DNR, please complete the following APPROvAL TYPE NEEDED DATE struerrEo foe itrrecoro sumer) - Have you paid the filing fees required for the DNR permits? If you are not applying for DNR permits, indicate reason below: (DNR contad) told ate on (date) that no DNR approvals or perniits were required on this project. b. Other ,c 1) tem-4 AA- (144 6cfm, eiAA. TOV IStv yveri.c.- • DEPARTMENT OF FISH & GAME APPROVALS 1. Will you be working in. or placing anything in, a stream, flier, or lake? (This includes work in running water or on ice, within the active flood plain, on islands, the face of the banks, or the stream tidelands down to mean low tide.) Nam of stream or river. Name of lake Wiil you be doing any of the following a) Building a dam, river training structure or instream irrt undmertt? b) • Using the water?' c) Diverting or altering the natural channel stream? I = 7 4 : 0 d) Blocking or damming the stream (temporarily or permanently)? e) Changing the water flow or the water channel? f) Pumping water out of the stream or lake? g) Introducing silt, gravel, rock, petroleum products, debris, chemicals or wastes of any type into the water? h) Using the stream as a road (even when frozen), or crossing the stream with tracked or * • wheeled vehicles, log-dragging or excavation equipment (backhoes, bulldozers, etc.)? i) Altering or stabilizing the banks? j) Mining or digging in the beds or banks? k) Using explosives? 1) Building a bridge (including an ice bridge)? Yes 4.1.0•111. 0 0 .11}1■11, .11■1111. No Ummoolows. 7 ..11011111101011. .111■••• MINNOMMO tn) - Installing a culvert or ott._ drainage structure? ni Constritsctirt; a weir? o) Other innst:eeas structure not mentioned above? 2. Ls your project located is a designated State Gana Refuge, Critical Habitat Ares. or State Game Sanctuary? 3. Does your project irrludd the construction and operation of a salmon hatchery? 4. . Does your project affect, or is it related to, a previously permitted salmon hatchery? 5. Does your project include the construction of an aquatic farm? 11 you answered "No" to ALL questions in this section, you do not need an approval from the Alaska Department of Fish and Game (DFG). Continue to next section. If you answered "Yes" to ANY questions under 1 or 2, contact the Regional DFG Habitat Division Office for information and application forms. If you answered "Yes" to questions 3, 4 or 5, contact the DFG at the F.R.ED. division headquarters for information and application forms. Based on your discussion with DFG, please complete the following: APPROVAL TYrs N ®® DATE smarm) (cat ernz o ro sumer) • If you are not applying for permits, indicate reason below: a. . (DFG contact) told ire on . (date) that na_DFG approval or permits were required on this project. ■ ❑ b. Other.. '71,u, 40 4*��'`�'"✓^ ■ DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION APPROVALS 1. Will a discharge of wastewater from-industrial or commercial operations occur? (See #2 in "Federal Approvals" section.) 2. Do you intend to construct, install or modify`any part of a wasteytatm ..(sewage or greywater) disposal system? 3. If "yes." will the discharge be 500 gpd or greater? 4. Do you expect to request a mixing zone for your proposed .project? if your wastewater discirawe will exceed Alaska water quality standards. you trait/ contact DEC to discuss information required under 18 AAC 70.032. 5. Will the project result in dredging or disposal fill in wetlands or placement of a structure in waterways? (Note: Your application for this activity to the Corps of Engineers will also serve as your application to DEC.) tinges. c 6. Will your project produce any domestic or industrial solid waste? 7. Will your project require the application of oil or pesticides to the surface of the land? Yes No ❑ Y_ 4 a. DO yea eafacility that will generate air emissions front processinggrener than fro. tons 0 yrliorof tr I ial? b. Do you haw one or more units of fuel burning equipment with a heat input rating of 50 RIME Mu parlour or more? _ . Dorabavotorindnarator with a rated capacity of 1,000 pounds per hourormore, or do you indurate sludge? d. Do you have any of the following processes: asphalt plant, petroleum refinery, coal preparation facility; or portland cement plant? Doe your facility meet any of the following criteria: 1. Use the following equipment diesel electric gaterating equipment (total capacity of 1750 lQ7aa att); gas fired boilers (total heat input rating of I00 million Btu perhour),-oi1 fired boilers (total heat input rating of 65 million Btu per hour); combustion turbine (total rated power output of 8000 Hp)? 2.-Burn more than the following per year in stationary equipment 1 A00,000 gallon, of fuel ad; 900 mdllian cubic fat of natural gas; or 35,000 tons of coal? f. If you have answered "yes" to any of the above questions, have you installed, replaced or modified any fuel burning or processing equipment since 1977? 9. WM you be altering a public water system? 10. Wi'a your project require offshore drilling or vessel transport of oil or other petroleum products as cargo, or include onshore facilities with an effective storage capacity of greater than 10,000 barrels of such products? 11. Will you be subdividing lands into two or more lots (parcels)? If you answered NO to ALL questions in this section, you do not need a permit or approval from the Alaska Departatent of Environmental Conservation (DEC). Please continue to the Certification Statement. If you answered YES to ANY of these questions (see N5 note), contact the DEC Regional Office for information and application forms. Based on your discussion with DEC, please complete the following: APPROVAL TYPE NEEDED DATE SUBMrrr o (OR QYrEND To silai4 in If you are not applying for permits, indicate reason below: Q a. (DEC contact) told me on (l(ate)r': that no DEC approval or permits were 7equired on this project. Q b. Other. 16; AA Lt i. C C G 014.,0 Gov j tow (,.Does 4,ex kvri c '": a - 000035 -3 Certification Statement The information conuitsed hesein is true and complete to the best of my latent/ledge. I certify that the proposed activity campus amd will be conducted in a =inner consistem with, the Alaska Coastal Management Program. 1/41WAitil Geed/404/ beC 41 No This certification staannent is a requirement for federal moth applicants. Federal agencies conducting an activity that will directly aka the caused sone us required to submit a federal consistency detertnination par 15 CFR 930, Subpart C. • To comp lets your packet, pluse attach applications to this questionnaire. pit appli federal permit Raised MO .41'4.'1! r.•• IMO COASTAL ZONE 3OlJ'1Q.RtES OF ALASICA SIM MO POINKIT LAND POT SUSACT ACCIPIID LOCAL mane. pule 4.10/001//i 11•111M111111 IMMO COMM MOM MOM AIMS • fp 9.0 IMMO ta OWN* NallOWNENO WI& MO . • , • ..• — • ••■■■ Oa =111111. .1111111Mt " AR- 00.00354 mono MOM. United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 10 Park Place Building, 13th Floor 1200 Sixth Avenue, WD -134 Seattle, Washington 98101. (206) 553 -1214 NOTICE OF PROPOSED REISSUANCE OF NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMITS TO DISCHARGE TO WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES, NOTICE OF STATE CERTIFICATION, AND NOTICE OF STATE DETERMINATION OF CONSISTENCY WITH THE ALASKA COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ' Public Notice No.: AK- 000043 -3, AK- 000083 -3, AK- 000036 -1, AK- 000042 -6, AK- 000008 -6, AK- 000035 -3, AK- 002666 -2, AK- 000049 -3, AK- 000082 -5 Public Notice Issuance Date: August 5, 1991 Public Notice Expiration Date: 8epteObar 3, 1991 1. Applicant. The following Kodiak seafood processors have applied for reissuance 01 their National` Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits to discharge process wastewater into St. Paul Harbor and Near Island Channel. These waters are classified by the Alaska State Water Quality Standards as class 2A, 2B, 2C, and 2D for use in aquaculture, seafood processing, and industrial water supply; contact and secondar; water recreation; growth and propagation of fish, shellfish, aquatic life and wildlife; and harvesting for the consumption of raw mollusks or other raw aquatic life. Fact sheets are available. 1. Alaska Pacific Seafoods, Inc. P.O. Box 31179 Seattle, Wa. 98103 Application No. AK- 000043 -4 2. All Alaskan.Seafoods, Inc.(Star of Kodiak) P.O. Box 646 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Application No. AK- 000083 -3 An -Alaskan Seafoods, Inc.(Alkod) 101 Marine Way Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Application No. AK- 000036 -1 Page 2 4. East Point Seafood Company Building C -3, Fisherman's Terminal Seattle, Wa. 98119 Application No.. AK- 000042 -6 5. Faros Seafoods, Inc. . 325 Shelikof Street Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Application No. AK- 000008 -6 6. International Seafoods of Alaska, Inc. P.O. Box 2997 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Application No. AK- 000035 -3 7. International Seafoods of Alaska, Inc. :P.O. Box 2997 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Application No. AK- 002666 -2 8. Ring Crab, Inc. P.O. Box C -70739 Seattle, Wa. 98107 Application No.. AK- 000049 -3. 9.. Western Alaska Fisheries, Inc. 1111 3rd Avenue, Suite 1210 Seattle, Wa 98101 Application No. AK- 000082 -5 2. Tentative Determination The Region 10 Office of the EPA has tentatively determined to reissue a discharge permit to the above listed applicants. State Certification This Notice will also serve as Public Notice of the intent of the State of Alaska, Department of Environmental Conservation to consider certifyingr that the subject discharge will comply with the applicable provisions of Section 208(e), 301, 301, 303, 306 and 307 of the Clean Water Act. The NPDES permit will not be issued until the certification requirements of Section 401 have been met. 4. State Consistency Determination This Notice will also serve as Public Notice of the intent of the State of Alaska, Office of Management and Budget, Division of Governmental Coordination, to review this action for consistency witl the approved Alaska Coastal Management Program. Page 3 . public Comments Persons wishing to comment on the tentative determinations contained in the proposed permit or wishing to request that a public hearing be held, may do so in writing, within 30 days of the date of this public notice. A request for a public hearing shall state the nature of the issues to be raised as well as the requester's name, address and telephone number. Comments must be received within this 30 day period to be considered in the formulation of final determinations regarding the application. All comments should include the name, address and telephone number of the commenter and a concise statement of the exact basis of any comment and the relevant facts upon which it is based. All written comments and requests should be submitted to EPA at the above address to the attention of the Director, Water Division. Persons wishing to comment on State Certification should submit written comments within this 30 day period to the State of. Alaska, Southcentral Regional Office, Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC), 3601 'C' Street, Suite 1334, Anchorage, Alaska 99503. Persons wishing to comment on the State Determination of Consistency with the Alaska. Coastal Management Program should submit written comments within this 30 day period, to the State of Alaska, Southcentral Regional' Office, Office of Management and Budget., Division of Governmental Coordination, 3601 'C' Street, Suite 370, Anchorage, Alaska 99503; Comments should be addressed to the attention of Alaska Coastal Management. Program Consistency Review. 6. Administrative Record The proposed NPDES permit and other related documents are on file and may be inspected at the above address any time between 8:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Copies and other information may be requested by writing to the EPA at the above address to the attention of the Water Permits Section, or by calling (206) 553 -1214. This material is also available from the EPA Alaska Operations Office, Roo 537, Federal Building, 222 West 7th Avenue, 119, Anchorage, Alaska 99513. FACT SHEET United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 10 Park Place Building, 13th Floor 1200 Sixth Avenue, WD -134 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 553 -1214 Date: AUG 0 5 1991 Permit No.: AK- 000035 -3 PROPOSED REISSUANCE OF A NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM ( NPDES) PERMIT'TO DISCHARGE POLLUTANTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT (CWA) INTERNATIONAL SEAFOOD OF ALASKA, INC. has applied for reissuance of a NPDES permit to discharge pollutants pursuant to the provisions of the CWA. This Fact Sheet includes (a) the tentative determination of the EPA to reissue the permit, (b) information on public comment, public hearing and appeal procedures, (c) the description of the current discharge, (d) a listing of tentative effluent limitations, schedules of compliance and other conditions, and (e) a sketch or detailed description of the discharge location. We call your special attention to the technical material presented in the latter part of this document. Persons wishing to comment on the tentative determinations contained in the proposed . permit reissuance may do so by the expiration date of the Public Notice. All written comments should be submitted to EPA as described in the Public Comments Section of the attached Public Notice.' After the expiration date of the Public Notice, the Director, Water Division, will make final determinations with respect to the permit reissuance. The tentative determinations contained in the draft permit will become final conditions if no substantive comments are received during the public notice period. The permit will become effective 30 days after the final determinations are made, unless a request for an evidentiary hearing is submitted within 30 days after receipt of the final determinations. The proposed NPDES permit and other related documents are on file and may be inspected at the above address any time between 8:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Copies and other information may be requested by writing to EPA at the above address to the attention of the Water Permits Section, or by calling (206) 553 -1214. This material is also available from the EPA Alaska Operations Office, Room 537, Federal Building, 222 W. 7th Avenue; #19, Anchorage, Alaska 99513. Pa c3at 2 Technical Information Applicant International Seafoods of Alaska, Inc. P.O. Box 2997 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 NPDES Permit No. AK- 000035 -3 (Kodiak Plant) Facility Contact: Izabela Byrne, Environmental Coordinator II. Activity International Seafoods of Alaska, Inc. operates a seafood processing facility in Kodiak, Alaska. Seafood is processed year round with a maximum production of 50 short tons per day of raw seafood. The expected maximum production of each species to be processed is as follows: Species Maximum Daily Production (Short Tons /Dayl (Pounds /Dav) Halibut 40 80,000 Cod 50 100,000 Flatfish 25 50,000 Blackcod 50 100,000 Rockfish ' 40 80,000 Salmon 50 100,000 Pollock 50 100,000 Receiving Waters A. St. Paul Harbor, Alaska B. St. Paul Harbor, Alaska is classified by the Alaska State Water Quality Standards . as Classes (2) (A) (i) (ii) (iii) , (B)(1)(ii),(C) and (D) for use in aquaculture, seafood processing and industrial water supply, contact and secondary water recreation, growth and propagation of fish, shellfish, other aquatic life and wildlife, and harvesting for the consumption of raw mollusks or other raw aquatic life. C. The state water quality parameters which could be affected by the discharge are dissolved gas, pH, turbidity, oil and grease, residual chlorine, total suspended solids and settleable solids. rags 3 IV. Backaroun4 A. The original NPDES permit was issued to Pacific Pearl Seafoods, effective June 2, 1975 and expiring May 31, 1980. The NPDES permit was reissued to Pacific Pearl Seafoods, effective October 30, 1980 and expiring October 30, 1985. This permit was transferred from Pacific Pearl Seafoods to International Seafoods of Alaska, Inc. effective December 19,1983. International Seafoods of Alaska, Inc. was issued their current permit, effective April 29, 1986 and expiring. April 29, 1991. The applicant has been operating under the terms and conditions of this permit, as allowed in 40 CFR Part 122.6. On January 1, 1991, EPA received a complete NPDES permit application from International Seafoods of Alaska, Inc. for a permit to discharge to St. Paul Harbor, Alaska. B. Existing industrial treatment includes grinding seafood wastes and screening process wastewater. The screened effluent is discharged to St. Paul Harbor. The screened solids are collected and transported to Kodiak Reduction, Inc. (KRI). in February 1984, the reduction facility was closed, with intent to reopen after reconstruction in March 1986. During this period of inactivity, solid wastes were barged to a designated seafood dumping .zone in Chiniak Bay. In March 1990, the reduction facility again closed down operations for a period of four months, wastes were again barged to the seafood dumping zone for disposal. Process water, obtained from the City of Kodiak, is chlorinated prior to use by International Seafoods of Alaska, Inc.. D. Sanitary wastes are discharged to the Kodiak City municipal treatment plant. E. The facility maintains one industrial outfall line, located 400 feet from the face of the dock, at a depth of 30 feet below the water surface. Only screened effluent is discharged and is characterized by the following: Operation Average Flow Ice Production 4,000 GPD Fish Processing 100,000 GPD Defrost Wastes 50.000 GPD. TOTAL DISCHARGE 154,000 GPD F. Pollutants associated with the discharge are primarily conventional and include pH, total suspended solids, and oil and grease. Pag•.4 V. . Basis of Limitation and Monitorina Requirements A. There are four modifications in the proposed permit which differ significantly from the previously issued NPDES permit. 1. All seafood waste shall be disposed of at a by- product reduction facility. Limited access to the ocean dumping zone is provided for the following: a. Waste which is unsuitable for by- product recovery. b. When the by- product recovery facility is operating at maximum capacity or is closed for repair and /or maintenance and is unable to accept seafood waste. 2. When effluent limitation guidelines. (40 CFR 408.202) were established the bottomfish industry in Alaska was primarily halibut, which is brought to the processing facility gutted. The product was headed and frozen and shipped out in that condition. The effluent from this process was quite low in pollutants. In the past several years a new bottomfish industry has emerged in Alaska. Halibut is no longer the dominant bottomfish species processed. Bottomfish such as cod pollock, and flatfish are harvested in large quantities. These species are usually brought to the plant whole, where the fish are mechanically butchered. Today's processing of bottomfish involves more extensive butchering and mechanization, therefore it has been determined that Non - Alaskan Mechanized Bottomfish Processing (40 CFR 408.222) more accurately reflect current seafood processing operations. 3. Monitoring residual chlorine is required to assess the impacts of this pollutant in the receiving environment. 4. Not grinding seafood wastes prior to screening was a requirement of the previous permit. To clarify the intent of this requirement the wording has been modified to the following: Seafood wastes shall not be pulverized, ground., chopped or otherwise altered prior to screening. B. The effluent limitations for the screened wastewater from finfish processing are based on Alaskan Mechanized Salmon Processing (40 CFR 408.172), Non - Alaskan Mechanized Bottomfish Processing (40 CFR 408.222), and Alaskan Bottomfish Processing (40 CFR 408.202) guidelines. Page 5 When more then one species is processed on a sampling day, the effluent limitation for that day is based on the proportion of each species processed. Variable monthly limits are also based on the proportion of each species processed. EPA has determined that this method of determining a variable limit is appropriate, since EPA guidelines, (40 CFR 408) are expressed in terms of pounds of pollutant per 1000 pounds of raw product processed. The method to determine the variable limitations and an example calculation are included in Attachments 1 and 2 of the permit. C. No grinding of seafood wastes prior to screening is a best management practice which carries out the intent of the Clean Water Act of reducing the amount of pollutants entering the receiving waters. D. Limitations on pH, visible environmental impacts, and receiving water accumulations of seafood wastes are based on Alaska State Water Quality Standards. These standards apply to all discharges from the facility, including process and non - process waters.. E. Monitoring is required pursuant to 40 CFR 122.44 •(i) and is necessary for determining compliance with permit effluent limitations and to evaluate potential water quality impacts resulting from the discharge. Monitoring frequencies are based on the Agency's determination of the minimum sampling required to adequately monitor facility performance.' Monitoring results will be reported in monthly Discharge Monitoring Reports. F. Total residual chlorine monitoring of process wastewater is required in the proposed permit. Process water is chlorinated prior to use in processing operations for disinfection purposes. Monitoring of residual chlorine in the effluent is required to assess the impacts of this . pollutant in the receiving environment. Processing records are necessary to characterize the type and amount of pollutants discharged to St. Paul Harbor. Page 6 VI. Other Reauirements. A. Non - process wastewater may be discharged through conveyances other than outfall 001. These include cooling water, boiler water, fresh water pressure relief discharges, and water used in live tanks. This authorization is based on the characteristics of the wastewater from these activities. These waters are expected to contain relatively minor concentrations of conventional pollutants (TSS, BOD, oil and grease) and small quantities of solids, and are not expected to adversely affect the receiving waters. B. Dive surveys in Petersburg (EPA, 1987) and Kodiak (EPA, 1988) have documented water quality impacts from seafood processing wastes. In Kodiak, divers observed the presence of anoxic sediments, waste accumulations, and bacterial layers over a large area (at least 75 meters in length) at the mouth of Gibson Cove. Based on these findings, an annual dive survey is required in this permit in order to determine compliance with state water quality standards as well as the extent•of the impacts on the receiving water due to the discharge of seafood wastes. The dive is scheduled at the end of the salmon processing season, which is the maximum production period. C. The proposed permit requires all collected solids to be disposed of at "a reduction facility. Halibut heads, shellfish waste and other EPA approved seafood waste, which are unsuitable for by- product recovery, may be disposed of at the ocean dumping` zone. The permittee may dispose of collected solid waste at the ocean dumping, zone provided certification is received from the by- product reduction facility stating the facility is operating at maximum capacity or is closed.. for repair and /or maintenance and is unable to utilize additional seafood waste. This requirement is necessary to insure maximum recycling of finfish waste and to facilitate accurate monitoring of the ocean dumping zone. D. Notification of changes in processing capacity is required to assure that the EPA and ADEC are notified of any potential increases in the amount of pollutants being discharged. This will allow an evaluation of the impact of the increased pollutant loading on the receiving waters. E. The re- opener clause, Part I.B. 8 of the permit, is required pursuant to 40 CFR 122.62. Page T F. Compliance with Alaska Water Quality Standards is a required condition of the permit pursuant to Section 301 of the.Clean Water Act. Permit No.: "AK- 000035 -3 'Application No._: AK- 000035 -3 United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10 1200 Sixth Avenue Seattle, Washington. 98101 AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C.. §1251 at seg., as amended by the Water Quality Act of 1987, P. L. 100 -4, the "Ac INTERNATIONAL SEAFOODS OF ALASKA, INC. is authorized to discharge from a seafood processing facility located in Kodiak, Alaska. to receiving waters named St.. Paul Harbor, in accordance with discharge.point(s), effluent limitations, monitoring requirements and other conditions set forth herein. This permit shall become effective This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight, . Signed this day of Director, Water Division, Region 10 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,. Page 2 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000035 -3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cover Sheet -- Issuance and Expiration Dates I. Effluent Limitations and Monitoring Requirements• A. Specific Limitations and Monitoring Requirements B. Other Requirements C. Definitions II. Monitoring, Recording and Reporting Requirements A. Representative Sampling B. Monitoring Procedures C. Reporting of Monitoring Results D. Additional Monitoring by the Permittee E. Records Contents F. Retention of Records G. Twenty -four Hour Notice of Noncompliance Reporting H. Other Noncompliance Reporting I. Inspection and Entry J. Compliance Schedules III. Compliance Responsibilities A. Duty to Comply B. Penalties for Violations of Permit Conditions C. Need to Halt or Reduce Activity not a.Defense D. Duty to Mitigate E. Proper Operation and Maintenance F. Removed Substances G. Bypass of Treatment Facilities H. Upset Conditions I. Toxic Pollutants IV. General Requirements A. Changes in Discharge of Toxic Substances B. Planned Changes C. Anticipated Noncompliance D. Permit Actions E. Duty to Reapply F. Duty to Provide Information G. Other Information H. Signatory Requirements I. Availability of Reports J. Oil and Hazardous Substance Liability K. Property Rights L. Severability M. Transfers N. State Laws ATTACHMENT 1 ATTACHMENT .2 FIGURE 1 Page 3 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000035 -3 EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS A. During the effective term of this permit, the permittee is authorized to discharge process wastewater from the processing of bottomfish (such as rockfish, pollock, and cod), halibut, and salmon to St. Paul Harbor from outfall 001. Treatment of process wastewater prior to discharge shall be accomplished through the use of fine mesh screening (1 mm) or equivalent technology. Seafood wastes shall not be pulverized, chopped, ground or . otherwise altered prior to screening. 1. Processing discharges shall be limited as specified below (limitations are dependent upon the raw products processed on the day samples are collected): Total Suspended Solids Oil and Grease Daily Max. Monthly Avg. Daily Max. Monthly Avg., Species . Halibut (and other headed /gutted bottomfish) (lbs /1000 lbs)* Mechanized Hottomfish (lbs /1000 lbs)* Alaskan Mechanized Salmon . . (lbs /1000 lbs)* 3.1 .1.9 4.3 0.56 • 22 12 9.9 3.9 44 26 29 11 Multiple Species. (See Attachment (lbs /1000 lbs)* Daily discharges shall be calculated as follows: *lbs pollutant /1,000 lbs raw product = (flow, mgd) X (conc. of pollutant, ma /1) X (8.340) (total lbs processed during the sampling day) NOTE: An example calculation is included in Attachment 2. Page 4 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000035 -3 2. Environmental Effects a. The pH shall not be less than 6.5 standard units nor greater than 8.5 standard units. b. There shall be no discharge of floating solids, visible foam, or oily wastes which produce a sheen on the surface of the receiving water. c. There shall be no accumulation of seafood processing wastes on the shoreline. d. There shall be no accumulation of wastes on the bottom of the receiving water. 3. Monitoring requirements. Effluent monitoring shall be conducted as follows: Parameter Freauency . Sample Tvpe Units Flow Daily 24 -Hour Record mgd TSS Weekly 24 -Hour Composite mg /1 Oil and Grease* Weekly Grab mg /1 Settleable Weekly 24 -Hour Composite ml /1 Solids Residual Chlorine Weekly Grab mg /1 pH. Weekly Grab Standard Units Waste Handling Daily - - - - - - - - System * Test using Collins\Tenny Method a. Samples shall be taken from the effluent stream after treatment and prior to its discharge to the receiving water.. b. At least one half of the residual chlorine samples will be taken during or immediately after the plant sanitation procedure. c. Daily flow shall be recorded on the same day effluent samples are taken. Page5 of-2 :Permit No-.: AK- 000035 -3 4. Receiving Water Inspections The water surface shall be visually inspected each week for floating solids, garbage, grease, foam and visible oil sheen. Results from these inspections shall be reported with each monthly Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR). 5. Processing Records The permittee shall' report daily processing volumes as part of the monthly Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR). The following parameters shall be reported: a. Quantity of raw seafood processed per day, by species (pounds). b. Type and quantity of finished product per day, by species (pounds). c. Estimate of quantity of seafood wastes disposed of via reduction facility (pounds). B. Other requirements. 1. Sanitary Wastewater Sanitary wastes shall be discharged to the Kodiak municipal treatment facility. The discharge of non - domestic wastewater to the city . sanitary wastewater treatment facility is prohibited unless prior approval is obtained from the operator of that facility. 2. Non - Process. Wastewater Cooling water, boiler, water, freshwater pressure relief discharges, and water used in live tanks may be discharged through conveyances other than outfall 001 provided the limitations in Part I.A.2 are met. Page 6.of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000035 -3 3. Dive Surveys Underwater dive surveys at outfall 001 shall be conducted once per year. Dive surveys shall be conducted within seven days after the termination of salmon processing but no later than October 15. The diver shall inspect the area under the dock as well as the outfall along its entire length. The permittee shall submit a dive survey report to EPA and ADEC no later than thirty days after each dive. The report shall include the following information: a. Location (including distance from shore and compass orientation), depth and condition of the outfall line (including presence, size, and location of any breaks or cracks). ,b. Water depth at the end of the outfall pipe. c. Inspection of the area at the end of the outfall pipe and documentation of the type, depth, areal extent, estimated volume, and sizes of particles of any waste accumulation. d. A plan view drawing (to scale) indicating the location of the dock, outfall pipe, prominent bottom features such as depressions, pockets, and large rocks, secondary slurry zones, and any area where seafood wastes have accumulated. The drawing shall also include the location, number and species of benthic organisms observed in areas adjacent,to the outfall and an indication of whether the organisms observed are alive, dead or stressed. e. Types of substrate in and adjacent to the outfall area. f. Video tape of dive showing all features listed in parts a,c, and d. 4. Waste Disposal Practices a. Disposal of all solid processing wastes, with the exception of waste products listed in part I.B.4.b., shall be to a by- product recovery facility, unless the permittee meets the requirements of part I.B.4.C.. b. Halibut heads, shellfish wastes, and other seafood wastes, as approved by EPA, which are unsuitable for processing at a by- product recovery facility may be disposed of at the ocean dumping zone identified in part I.B.4.d., and figure 1 of this permit. e. E Page 7 of 20 ' Permit No.: AK-000035 -3 The permittee may submit a written request, to EPA, to have a species of fish classified as unsuitable for processing at a by- product recovery facility. If EPA approves the permittee's request and classifies a species of fish as unsuitable for processing at a by- product recovery facility, that classification shall remain in effect for the term of this permit. c. In the event the permittee is unable to dispose of collected seafood waste by means of by- product recovery, because the recovery facility was operating at maximum capacity or was closed for repair and /or maintenance and was unable to utilize additional seafood waste, the permittee may dispose of said waste in the ocean dumping zone. The permittee shall provide the following information. to EPA with the monthly Discharge Monitoring Report for each disposal activity: 1. The permittee must obtain certification from the by- product recovery facility stating: • the recovery facility was operating at maximum capacity or was closed for repair and /or maintenance and was unable to utilize additional seafood waste and • the date the seafood waste was not accepted at the by- product recovery facility. 2. Estimate of quantity of seafood waste disposed of at the ocean dumping zone. 3. Name and address of company responsible for . barging said waste to the seafood dumping zone. 4. Latitude and longitude of area where wastes were disposed in the ocean dumping zone. d. The ocean dumping zone is generally bordered by the Base. Line to the east and the fifty (50) fathom line plotted on U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Map No. 8534. Page 8 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000035 -3 Notification of Changes in Capacity The permittee shall give notice to the Director and ADEC of any planned physical alterations or operational changes to the permitted facility which will result in the processing of more than the following amounts of raw seafood in a single day: Species Maximum Daily Production Halibut 80,000 pounds Salmon 100,000 pounds Flatfish 50,000. pounds Blackcod 100,000 pounds Rockfish 80,000 pounds Cod 100,000 pounds Pollock 100,000 pounds Notification shall be given at least ninety (90) days prior to implementation of the planned changes. Reopener Clause If effluent limitation guidelines applicable to this facility are promulgated that contain limits different from those contained in this permit, the permit shall be modified to reflect the limits in the guidelines. If there is evidence indicating potential or realized impacts on water quality due to the discharge of seafood processing wastewater, the permit may be modified to include different effluent limitations and /or additional monitoring requirements. 7. Alaska Water Quality Standards All discharges shall be in compliance with Alaska Water Quality Standards (18 AAC 70). E. Definitions. 1. "Accumulation" refers to the presence of any measurable amount of seafood waste present on the bottom substrate. For purposes of this permit, measurable is defined as a thickness of one centimeter or more. 2. "Bypass" means the intentional diversion of waste streams from any portion of a treatment facility. Page 9 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000035 -3 3. "Daily Discharge" means the discharge of a pollutant measured during a calendar day or any 24 -hour period that reasonably represents the calendar day for purposes of sampling. For pollutants with limitations expressed in units of mass, the "daily discharge" is calculated as the . total mass of the pollutant discharged over the day. For pollutants with limitations expressed in other units of . measurement, the "daily discharge" is calculated as the average measurement of the pollutant over the day. 4. "Daily Maximum" discharge means the highest allowable "daily - discharge ". 5. "Grab" sample is a single sample or measurement taken at a specific time or over as short a period of time as is feasible. 6. "Monthly Average" discharge means the . highest allowable average of "daily discharges" over a calendar month, calculated as sum of all "daily discharges" measured during a calendar month divided by the number of "daily discharges" measured during that month. 7. "Quantity. of Waste" is calculated as follows: Quantity of Waste = (Quantity of Raw Seafood) - (Quantity of Finished Product). 8. "Severe Property Damage" means substantial physical damage to property, damage to the treatment facilities which causes . them to become inoperable, or substantial and permanent loss of natural resources which can reasonably be expected to occur in the absence of a.bypass. Severe property damage does not mean economic loss caused by delays in production. 9. "24 -Hour Composite" sample shall mean a flow proportioned mixture of not less than .8 discrete aliquots. Each aliquot shall be a grab sample of not less than 100. ml and shall be collected and stored in accordance with procedures prescribed in the most recent edition of Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 10. "Upset" means an exceptional incident in which there is unintentional and temporary noncompliance with technology based permit effluent limitations because of factors beyond the reasonable control of the permittee. An upset does not include noncompliance to the extent caused by operational error, improperly designed treatment facilities, inadequate treatment facilities, lack of preventive maintenance, or careless or improper operation. Page 10 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000035 -3 II. MONITORING, RECORDING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS A. Representative Sampling. Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirements established under Part I shall be collected from the effluent stream prior to discharge into the receiving waters. Samples and measurements shall be representative of the volume and nature of the monitored discharge. Monitoring Procedures.. Monitoring must be conducted according to test procedures approved under 40 CFR Part 136, unless other test procedures have been specified in this permit. C. Reportina of Monitoring Results. Monitoring results shall be summarized each month on the Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) form (EPA No. 3320 -1). The reports shall be submitted monthly and are to be postmarked by the 10th day of the following month. Legible copies of these, and all other reports, shall be signed and certified in accordance with the requirements of Part IV.H., Signatory Requirements, and submitted to the Director, Water Division and the State agency at the following addresses: original to: United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 10 1200 Sixth Avenue, WD -135 Seattle, Washington 98101 copy to: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC) Southcentral Region 3.601 'C' Street, Suite 1334 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 D. Additional Monitorina by the Permittee. If the permittee monitors any pollutant more frequently than required by this permit, using test procedures approved under 40 CFR 136 or as specified in this permit, the results of this monitoring shall be . included in the calculation and reporting of the data submitted in the DMR. Such increased frequency shall also be indicated. E. Records Contents. Records of monitoring information shall include: 1. The date, exact place, and time of sampling or measurements; 2. The individual(s) who performed the sampling or measurements; 3. The date(s) analyses were performed; 4. The individual(s) who performed the analyses; 5. The analytical techniques or methods used; and 6. The results of such analyses. Page 11 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000035 -3 F. Retention of Records. The permittee shall retain records of all monitoring information, including all calibration and maintenance records and all original strip chart recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation, copies of all reports required by this permit, and records of all data used to complete the application for this permit, for a period of at least three years from the date of the sample, measurement, report or application. This period may be extended by request of the Director or ADEC at any time. Data collected on -site, copies of Discharge Monitoring Reports, and a copy of this NPDES permit must be maintained on -site during the duration of activity at the permitted location. Twenty -four Hour Notice of Noncompliance Reporting. 1. The following occurrences of noncompliance shall be reported by telephone within 24 hours from the time the permittee becomes aware of the circumstances: a. Any noncompliance which may endanger health or the environment; b. Any unanticipated bypass which exceeds any effluent limitation in the permit (See Part III.G.. Evoass of Treatment Facilities.); c. Any upset which exceeds any effluent limitation in the permit (See Part III,H., Upset Conditions.); or d. Violation of a maximum daily discharge limitation for any of the pollutants listed in the permit to be reported within 24 hours. A written submission shall also be provided within five days of the time that the permittee becomes aware of the circumstances. The written submission shall contain: a. A description of the noncompliance and its cause; b. The period of noncompliance, including exact dates and times; c. The estimated time noncompliance is expected to continue if it has not been corrected; and d. Steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate and prevent reoccurrence of the noncompliance. The Director may waive the written report on a case -by -case basis if the oral report has been received within 24 hours by the Water Compliance Section in Seattle, Washington, by phone, (206) 553 -1213. Page 12 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000035 -3 4. Reports shall be submitted to the addresses in part I.I.C.. geoortina of Monitorina Results. H. Other Noncompliance Reporting. Instances of noncompliance not required to be reported within 24 hours shall be reported at the time that monitoring reports for Part.II.C. are submitted. The reports shall contain the information listed in Part II.G.2. I. Inspection and Entry. The permittee shall allow the Director, ADEC, or an authorized representative (including an authorized contractor acting as a representative of the Administrator), upon the presentation of credentials and other documents as may be required by law, to: 1. Enter upon the permittee's premises where a regulated facility or activity is located or conducted, or where records must be kept under the conditions of this permit; 2. Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the conditions of this permit; 3. Inspect at reasonable times any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and control equipment), practices, or operations regulated or required under this permit; and 4. Sample or monitor at reasonable times, for the purpose of assuring permit compliance or as otherwise authorized by the Act, any substances or parameters at any location. J. Compliance Schedules,. Reports of compliance or noncompliance with, or any progress reports on interim and final requirements contained in any Compliance Schedule of this permit (Part I) • shall be submitted no later than 10 days following each schedule date. III. COMPLIANCE RESPONSIBILITIES A. Duty 'to Comply. The permittee must comply with all conditions of this permit. Any permit noncompliance constitutes a violation of the Act and is grounds for enforcement action; for permit termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification; or for denial of apermit renewal application. The permittee shall give advance notice to the Director and ADEC of any planned changes in the permitted facility or-activity which may result in noncompliance with permit requirements. B. Penalties for.Vio].ations of Permit Conditions. 1. Civil Penalty. The Act provides that any person who violates a permit condition implementing Sections 301, 302., 306, 307, 308, 318, or 405 of the Act shall be subject to a civil penalty, not to exceed $25,000 per day for each violation. Page 13 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000035 -3 2. Criminal Penalties: a. Negligent Violations. The Act provides that any person who negligently violates a permit condition implementing Sections 301, 302, 306, 307, 308, 318, or 405 of the Act shall be punished by a fine of not less than $2,500 nor more than $25,000 per day of violation, or by imprisonment for not more than 1 year, or by both. b. Knowing Violations. The Act provides that any person who knowingly violates a permit condition implementing. Sections 301, 302,, 306, 307, 308, 318, or 405 of the Act shall be punished by a fine of not less than $5,000 nor more than $50,000 per day of violation, or by imprisonment for not more than 3 years, or by both. c. Knowing Endangerment. The Act provides that any person who knowingly violates a permit condition implementing Sections 301, 302, 306, 307, 308, 318, or 405 of the Act, and who knows at that time that he thereby places another person in imminent danger of death or serious bodily injury, shall, upon conviction, be subject to a fine of not more than $250,000 or imprisonment of not more than 15 years, or both. A person which is an organization shall, upon conviction of violating this subparagraph, be subject to a fine of not more than $1,000,000. d. False Statements. The Act provides that any person who knowingly makes any false material statement, representation, or certification in any application, record, report, plan, or other document filed or required to be maintained under this Act or who knowingly falsifies, tampers with, or renders inaccurate any monitoring device or method required to . be maintained under this Act, shall upon conviction, be punished by a fine of not more that $10,000, or by imprisonment for not more than 2 years, or by both. Except as provided in permit conditions in Part III.G.. Bypass of Treatment Facilities and Part III.H.. Upset Conditions, nothing in this permit shall be construed to relieve the permittee of the civil or criminal penalties for noncompliance. C. Need to Halt or Reduce Activity not a Defense. It shall not be a defense for a permittee in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the conditions of this permit. D. Duty to Mitigate. The permittee shall take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any discharge in violation of this permit which has a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting human health or the environment. . Arip Page 14 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000035 -3 E. Prosier Operation and Maintenance. The permittee shall at all times properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems of treatment and control (and related appurtenances) vhich are installed or used by the permittee to achieve compliance with the conditions of this permit. Proper operation and maintenance also includes adequate laboratory controls and appropriate quality assurance procedures. This provision requires the operation of back -up or auxiliary facilities or similar systems which are installed by a permittee only when the operation is necessary to achieve compliance with the conditions of the permit. F. Removed Substances. Solids, sludges, filter backwash, or other pollutants removed in the course of treatment or control of wastewater shall be disposed of in a manner such as to prevent any pollutant from such materials from entering navigable waters. G. pypass of Treatment Facilities: 1. Bypass not exceeding limitations. The permittee may allow any bypass to occur which does not cause effluent limitations to be exceeded, but only if it also is for essential maintenance to assure efficient operation. These bypasses are not .subject to the provisions of paragraphs 2 and 3 of this section. 2. Notice: a. Anticipated bypass. If the permittee knows in advance of the need for a bypass, it shall submit prior notice, if possible at least 10 days before the date of the bypass. b. Unanticipated bypass. The permittee shall submit notice of an unanticipated bypass as required under Part II.G.. Twenty -four Hour Notice of Noncompliance Reporting. 3. Prohibition of bypass. a. Bypass is prohibited and the Director or ADEC may take enforcement action against a permittee for a bypass, unless: (1) The bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life, personal injury, or severe property damage; 0R4 FT Page 15 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000035 -3 (2) There were no feasible alternatives to the bypass, such as the use of auxiliary treatment facilities, retention of untreated wastes, or maintenance during normal periods of equipment downtime. This condition is not satisfied if adequate back -up equipment should have been installed in the exercise of reasonable engineering judgment to prevent bypass which occurred during normal periods of equipment, downtime or preventive maintenance; and (3). The permittee submitted notices as required under paragraph 2 of this section. b. The Director and ADEC may approve an anticipated . bypass, after considering its adverse effects, if the Director and ADEC determine that it will meet the three conditions listed above in paragraph 3.a. of this section. H. Upset Conditions. 1. Effect of an upset. An upset constitutes an affirmative defense to an action brought for noncompliance with such technology based permit effluent limitations if the requirements of paragraph 2 of this section are met. No determination made during administrative review of claims that noncompliance was caused by upset, and before an action for noncompliance, is final administrative action subject to judicial review. 2. Conditions necessary for a demonstration of upset. A permittee who wishes to establish the affirmative defense of upset shall demonstrate, through properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs, or other relevant evidence that: a. An upset occurred and that the permittee can identify the cause(s) of the upset; b. The permitted facility was at the time being properly operated; c. The permittee submitted notice of the upset as requires under Part II.G.z Twentv -four Hour Notice of Noncompliance Reporting; and d. The permittee complied with any remedial measures required under Part III.D., Duty to Mitiaate. 3. .Burden of proof. In any enforcement proceeding, the permittee seeking to establish the occurrence of an upset has the burden of proof. Page 16 of 20 .Permit No.: AR- 000035 -3 Toxic Pollutants. The permittee shall comply with effluent . standards or prohibitions established under Section 307(a) of the Act for toxic pollutants within the time provided in the regulations that establish. those standards or prohibitions, even if the permit has not yet been modified to incorporate the "requirement. IV. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Chances in Discharge of Toxic Substances. Notification shall be provided to the Director and ADEC as soon as the permittee knows of, or has reason to believe: - 1. That any activity has occurred or will occur which would result in the discharge, on a routine or frequent basis, of . any toxic pollutant which is not limited in the permit, if that discharge will exceed the highest of the following "notification levels ": a. One hundred micrograms per liter (100 ug /1); b. Two hundred micrograms per liter (200 ug /1) for acrolein and acrylonitrile, five hundred micrograms per liter (500 ug /1) for 2,4- dinitrophenol and for 2- methyl -4, 6- dinitrophenol; and one milligram per liter (1 mg /1) for antimony; c. Five (5) times the maximum concentration value reported for that pollutant in the permit application in accordance with 40 CFR 122.21(g)(7); or d. The level established by the Director in accordance with 40 CFR 122.44(f). 2. That any activity has occurred or will occur which would result in any discharge, on a non - routine or infrequent basis, of a toxic pollutant which is not limited in the permit, if that discharge will exceed the highest of the following "notification levels ": a. Five hundred micrograms per liter (500 ug /1); b. One milligram per liter (1 mg /1) for antimony; c. Ten (10) times the maximum concentration value reported for that pollutant in the permit application in accordance with 40 CFR 122.21(g)(7); or d. The level established by the Director in accordance with 40 CFR 122.44(f). _U T Page 17 of 20 Permit No.: AK-000035-3 .8. planned Changes. The•permittee shall give notice. to the Director and ADEC as soon as possible of any planned physical alterations or additions to the permitted facility. Notice is required only • when: 1. The alteration or addition to a permitted facility may meet one of the criteria for determining whether a facility is a new source as determined in 40 CFR 122.29(b); or 2. The alteration or addition could significantly change the nature or increase the quantity of pollutants discharged. This notification applies to pollutants which are subject neither to effluent limitations in the permit, nor to notification requirements under Part IV.A.1. C. Anticipated Noncompliance. The permittee shall also give advance notice to the Director and ADEC of any planned changes in the permitted facility or activity which may result in noncompliance with permit requirements. D. Permit Actions. This permit may be modified, revoked and reissued, or terminated for cause. The filing of a request by the permittee for a permit modification, revocation and reissuance, or termination, or a notification of planned changes or anticipated noncompliance, does not stay any permit condition. E. Duty to Reapply. If the permittee wishes to continue an activity regulated by this permit after the expiration date of this permit, the permittee must apply for and obtain a new permit. The application should be submitted at least 180 days before the expiration date of this permit. F. Duty to Provide Information. The permittee shall furnish to the Director and ADEC, within a reasonable time, any information which the Director or ADEC may request to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and reissuing, or terminating this permit, or to determine compliance with this permit. The permittee shall also furnish to the Director or ADEC, upon request, copies of records required to be kept by this permit. G. Other Information. When the permittee becomes aware that it failed to submit any relevant facts in a permit application, or submitted incorrect information in a permit application or any report to the Director or ADEC, it shall promptly submit such facts or information. DRAFT. Page 18 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 00003.5 -3 H. Signatory Re_auirements. All applications, reports or information submitted to the Director and ADEC shall be signed and certified. 1. All permit applications shall be signed as follows: a. For a corporation: by a responsible corporate officer. b. For a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the proprietor, respectively. c. For a municipality, state, federal, or other public agency: by either a principal executive officer or ranking elected official. 2. All reports required by the permit and other information requested by the Director or ADEC shall be signed by a person described above or by a duly authorized representative of that person. A person is a duly` authorized representative only if: a. The authorization is made in writing by a person described above and submitted to the Director and ADEC, and b. The authorization specified either an individual or a position having responsibility for the overall operation of the regulated facility or activity, such as the position of plant manager, operator of a well or a well field, superintendent, position of equivalent responsibility, or an individual or position having overall responsibility for environmental matters for the company. (A duly authorized representative may thus be either a named individual or any individual occupying a named position.) Changes to authorization. If an authorization under paragraph IV.H.2. is no longer accurate because a different individual or position has responsibility for the overall operation of the facility, a new authorization satisfying the requirements of paragraph IV.H.2. must be submitted to the Director and ADEC prior to or together with any reports, information, or applications to be signed by an authorized representative. r i c le Page 19 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000035 -3 4. Certification. Any person signing a document under this section shall make the following certification: "I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and . evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations." I. Availability of Reports. Except for data determined to be confidential under 40 CFR Part 2, all reports prepared in accordance with the terms of this permit shall be available for public inspection at the offices of the Director and ADEC. As required by the Act, permit applications, permits and effluent data shall not be considered confidential. J. Oil an0 Hazardous Substance Liability. Nothing in this permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal . action or relieve the permittee from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties to which the permittee is or may subject under Section 311 of the Act. K. Property Rights. The issuance of this permit does not convey any property rights of any sort, or any exclusive privileges, nor does it authorize any injury to private property or any invasion of personal rights, nor any infringement of federal, state or local laws or regulations. L. Severability. The provisions of this permit are severable, and if any provision . of this permit, or the application of any provision of this permit to any circumstance, is held invalid, the application of such provision to other circumstances, and the remainder of this permit, shall not be affected thereby. Transfers. This permit may be automatically transferred to a nev permittee if: 1. The current permittee notifies the Director at least 30 day: in advance of the proposed transfer date; 2. The notice includes a written agreement between the existinc and new permittees containing a specific date for transfer of permit responsibility, coverage, and liability between them; and Page 20 of .20 Permit No.: AK- 000035 -3 3. The Director does not notify the existing permittee and the proposed new permittee of his or her intent to modify, or revoke and reissue the permit. If this notice is not received, the transfer is effective on the date specified in the agreement mentioned in paragraph 2 above. N. State Laws. Nothing in this permit shall be construed to .preclude the institution of any legal action or relieve the permittee from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties established pursuant to any applicable state law or regulation under authority preserved by Section 510 of the Act. ATTACHMENT .1 Effluent limitations for the processing of multiple species are derived using the following "generic" equation: Limit in.lbs /1000 lbs = (Bottomfish Limit)(% Bottomfish) + (Crab Limit)($ Crab) + (Herring Limit)($ Herring) + (HB Salmon Limit)(% HB Salmon) + (Mech Salmon Limit)(% Mech Salmon) + (Scallop Limit.)($ Scallop) where, % Bottomfish % Crab % Herring % HB Salmon % Mech Salmon % Scallop and, Bottomfish Limit Crab Limit Herring Limit = Amount of bottomfish processed divided by the total amount of seafood processed = .(Amount of Bottomfish) / (Amount of Raw Seafood) = Amount of crab processed divided by the total amount of seafood processed = (Amount of Crab) / (Amount of Raw Seafood) = Amount of herring processed divided by the total amount of seafood processed = (Amount of Herring) / (Amount of Raw Seafood) = Amount of hand - butchered salmon divided by the total amount of seafood processed = (Amount of HB Salmon) / (Amount of Raw Seafood) = Amount of mechanized salmon divided by the total amount of seafood processed = (Amount of Mech. Salmon) / (Amount of Raw Seafood) = Amount of scallop processed divided by the total amount of seafood processed = (Amount of Scallop) / (Amount of Raw Seafood) = Effluent processing = Effluent = Effluent processing limitation in Part I.A.1. for bottomfish limitation limitation in Part I.A.1. for processing in Part I.A. for herring 2 HB Salmon Limit = Effluent limitation in Part I.A. for hand - butchered Mech Salmon Limit = Effluent limitation in Part I.A. for mechanized Scallop Limit = Effluent limitation in Part I.A. for scallo processing Two pollutants are limited in the permit, TSS Each pollutant is limited on a monthly average and Therefore, by substituting the limitation for each equation above, we can generate the following four Species processing: salmon salmon processing TSS - Monthly Average TSS -- Daily Maximum • Oil and Grease - Monthly Average Oil and Grease - Daily Maximum .and Oil and Grease. daily.maximum basis. species in the generic limitations for Multiple TSS - Monthly Average Limitation = 12(% Bottomfish) + 3.9(% Crab) + 24(% Herring) + 1.6(% HB Salmon) + 26(% Mech Salmon) + 1.4(% Scallop) NOTE: Processing percentages are calculated over the month TSS - Daily Maximum Limitation =. 22(% Bottomfish) + 12(% Crab) + 32(% Herring) + 2.6(% HB Salmon) + 44(% Mech Salmon) + 6.6(% Scallop) NOTE: Processing percentages are calculated over the sampling day Oil and Grease - Monthly Average Limitation = 3.9(% Bottomfish) + 0.42(% Crab) + 10(% Herring) + 0.19(% HB Salmon) + 11(% Mech Salmon) + 0.24(% Scallop) NOTE: Processing percentages are calculated over the month Oil and Grease - Daily Maximum Limitation = 9.9(% Bottomfish) + 1.3(% Crab) + 27(% Herring) + 0.31(% HB Salmon) + 29(% Mech Salmon) + 7.7(% Scallop) NOTE: Processing percentages are calculated over the sampling day. These limitations shall be calculated and included in an attachment.tc the monthly DMRs. 'ATTACHMENT 2 Example of Calculations to Determine Compliance With the Permit Limits These are sample calculations of plant discharge (lbs /1000 lbs) values which shall be compared to limitations in Part I.A.1. to determine compliance. Given: Discharges were sampled four days during the month of June 1988. Hand- butchered salmon and bottomfish were processed. The following table, provides data for the month of June 1988. Pounds of Raw Product Date Flow. MGD TSS Conc..mg /1 HB Salmon Bottomfish 6/2/88 0.075 36.8 - - - 10,000 6/9/88 0.098. 41.5 - - 23,070 6/16/88 0.127 39.4 6,155 60,000 6/27/88 0.077 47.5 1,210 Daily Maximum Calculations Step 1. Determine the Daily Maximum discharge for TSS for each day samples are collected. Daily Maximum discharge (in lbs /1000 lbs) equals the measured effluent flow (mgd), multiplied by the measured effluent concentration (mg /1), multiplied by a conversion factor (8,340), and divided by the total amount of raw seafood processed (lbs). Note that the flow, concentration, and amount of seafood processed shall be measured over the same 24 -hour period. Daily Maximum = jflowl(concentration)(8.340) (Daily Production) Therefore, 6/2/88, Daily Maximum = ( 0. 075mgd)(36.8mg/1)(8,340)/10,000 lbs = 2.30 lbs /1.000 lbs 6/9/88 Daily Maximum = ( 0. 098mgd)(41.5mg/1)(8,340)/23,070 lbs = 1.47 lbs /1.000 lbs 6/16/88 Daily Maximum =.( 0. 127mgd)(39.4mg/1)(8,340)/66,155 lbs = 0.63 lbs /1,000 lbs Y 6/27/88, Daily Maximum = ( 0 .077mgd)(47.5mg/1)(8,340)11,210 lbs = 25.2 lbs/1.000 lbs Daily Maximum calculations shall be made for each day that samples are collected. Step 2. Determine compliance with applicable daily maximum effluent limitations. To determine compliance, the above calculated Daily Maximum discharge value shall be compared to the applicable Daily Maximum limit in Part I.A.1. of the permit.. The applicable limitation from Part I.A.1. is dependent upon whether only hand - butchered salmon, only bottomfish, or both hand - butchered salmon and bottomfish are processed on the day of sampling. Since only bottomfish is processed on 6/2/88 and 6/9/88, these calculated daily maximum discharge values shall be compared to the daily maximum TSS limitation in Part I.A.1., for bottomfish, of 22 lbs /1,000 lbs. The same type of comparison can be made for the 6/27/88 calculation where only hand- butchered salmon is processed. Because more than one species of seafood is processed on 6/16/88, the calculated daily maximum TSS discharged must be compared to a. variable limitation which is derived based upon a proportion of each seafood species processed. This variable Daily Max TSS Limitation is calculated as follows: Limitation = 2.6(% HB Salmon) + 22(% Bottomfish) = 2.6(6,155/66,155) + 22(60,000/66,155) = 20.2 lbs/1000 lbs This equation is defined in detail in Attachment 1 of the permit. CONCLUSION DATE TSS DAILY MAX TSS DAILY MAX LIMITATION, (LBS /1000 LBS.) (PART I.A.1. OF PERMIT) (LBS/1000 LBS) 6/2/88 2.30 22 6/9/88 1.47 .22 6/16/88 0.63 20.2 6/27/88. 25.20 2.6 From the above information, it can be seen that the facility was not in compliance on 6/27/88. Monthly Average Calculations Step 1. Determine the Average Monthly discharge for TSS (for June 1988) The Average Monthly TSS discharge equals the summation of all Daily Maximum discharge values calculated during the time period covered by the DMR in question (June), divided by the total production. Therefore, Monthly Average = [(0.075 mgd) + (0.098 mgd) + (0.127 mgd) + (0.077 mgd) x (8,340)/(10 = 1.3 lbs /1000 (36.8 mg /1) (41.5 mg /4 (39.4 mg /1) (47.5 mg /1)] ,000 + 23,070 + 66,155 + 1,210) lbs Monthly Average calculations shall be made each month. Step 2. Determine compliance with applicable monthly average effluent limitations. To determine compliance, the above calculated Monthly Average discharge value shall be compared to the applicable Monthly Average limitation in Part I.A.1. of the permit. The applicable limitation from Part I.A.1. is dependent upon whether only hand - butchered salmon, only bottomfish, or both hand- butchered salmon and bottomfish are processed on any day that samples are collected, during the month in question. For this example, since both hand - butchered salmon and bottomfish are processed during the sampling period in the month of June the above calculated Monthly Average TSS discharge must be compared to a variable limitation which is based upon a proportion of each seafood species processed. This variable Monthly Average TSS limitation is calculated as follows: Limitation = 1.6(% HB Salmon) + 12(% Bottomfish) = 1.6(7,365/100,435) + 12(93,070/100,435) = 11.2 lbs /1.000 lbs This equation is defined in detail in Attachment 1 of the permit. CONCLUSION DATE TSS MONTHLY AVG TSS MONTHLY AVG LIMITATION '(LBS /1000 LBS) PART I.A.1. OF PERMIT• .(LBS /1000•LBS) 6/2/88 • THRU . 6/27/88 . 1.3 11.2 4 From'the above information, it can be seen that the facility was in compliance for .the TSS'Monthly Average limitations. NOTE: The above example only examines the.TSS results. The same calculations apply to Oil & Grease. Calculations shall be made during each month and submitted with the DMRs.for the month in question. - *40..fa" +1i�►ll /1tr`_/ f .r ' +• •;+.• •. 0; 1• 10 :it/ 44 w1► le- an Ii fa " 1 N , �a •'•.1' I{ f i as b 81 ,r'i: • sa 93 ail • eIvieli r s • !; • • fa f3 1 as • •. at 13 IS Ii 03 •is a{ • f► 14 w as as of 1r ar at f 44, 40 If • • 1 .i' at i rips fa M N as `, Ara y • a1 al �J:' r • . •«r` ` Va. or fI • $3 13 • to s/ Si • as 14.6 ••••J••I• • is 44 J• ••■y�,. 1 •fa s! t;!► ra. N at fa 13 . 's+ as a as t' 1• "ii ar ••s • as :+s.•.� �! 1 A. "► �,.w •4 N M 4 f n► 70 ■ `•"� • '4 r is • • 4 4• .....• •s•''• r •..4; '%; ! '.• "'or •/ 'r{✓ •'i. •4 b • r ~ 'Ia III. Ss Ms a•1 34 *4 •114; •3 k to •l as �i �1{ *11: 3a 1s .b as Kodiak Island Borough Elizabeth Benson, Project Coordinator OMB-DGC Southcentral Regional Office 3601 C Street, Suite 370 Anchorage, AK 99503 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 September 22, 1991 RE: SID AK 910827-18A - International Seafoods of Alaska NPDES AK-002666-2 Dear Ms. Benson: The Kodiak Island Borough has reviewed the seafood processing facility discharge permit referenced above. We support the issuance of the permit as long as state water quality standards are met. For the record, the Kodiak Island Borough does not have the expertise to review the technical aspects of the permit. Seafood processing is a significant contributor to economic activity in the Kodiak Island Borough. Based on our limited review of the permit application, the Kodiak Island Borough recommends that this permit be found consistent with the Kodiak Island Borough Coastal Management Program (KIBCMP) and the Alaska Coastal Management Program (ACMP). If you have any questions about these comments, please call me. Sincerely, Linda Freed, Director Community Development Department cc: W. Dolezal, ADF&G V. Gilbert, ADNR B. Lamoreaux, ADEC David Rogers, International Seafoods of Alaska Ray Camardella, KIB Engineering/Facilities Dept. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OFFICZ OF GOVERNOR DEC OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT" AND BUDGET DMtD J . ' ._ DIVISION OF GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION E COE PROJECT pxo.TECr INFORMATION sue' ntun;Bira,Q .Z4 �1; J. souTHCENnw, MOW MOT 'C' STREET SUITE 370 ANCHORAGE, MAMA MON 7 (907) 56141X - c o z6ch STATE I.D. NUMBER: AK91d0 a 1 18 A DGC CONTACT: 1/)'I 70-04eik- 5Z7K. APPLICANTfPRO DIRECT F ERAL ACTION: 61 31 REVIEW TYPE: CONSISTENCY ✓ ANILCA ACTIVITY TYPE: ARMED FORCES COMMERCIAL LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN MINING: HARDROCK PLACER OFFSHORE OIL & GAS PUBLIC UTILTTIES/FACILITIES PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL FILL PLACEMENT FLOATING STRUCTURES PRO LOCATION: Nearest Coastal District Project Inside the District Boundary Yes District Plan Approved Y :� No A FISHERIES PRODUCTION: GENERAL_ HATCHERY REMOTE RELEASE PROCESSING T AQUATIC FARMS: SHELLFISH AQUATIC PLANTS HYDRO POWER TIMBER Day 1 g�. ,�- 2 ?, 1.9 q Reviewer Request for Add'l Comments Due To DGC, Notification To Appl can Decision Deadline 15 DAY 30 DAY SO DAY c— OTC FACT SHEET United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 10 Park Place Building, 13th Floor 1200 Sixth Avenue, WD -134 Seattle,, Washington 98101 (206) 553 -1214 Date: AUG 0 5 1991 Permit No.: AK- 002666 -2 PROPOSED•REISSUANCE OF A NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT TO DISCHARGE POLLUTANTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT (CWA) INTERNATIONAL SEAFOOD OF ALASKA, INC. has applied for reissuance of a NPDES permit to discharge pollutants pursuant to the provisions of the CWA. This Fact Sheet includes (a) the tentative determination of the EPA to reissue the permit, (b) information on public comment, public hearing and appeal procedures, (c) the description of the current discharge, (d) a listing of tentative effluent limitations, schedules of compliance and other conditions, and (e) a sketch, or detailed description of the discharge location. We call your special attention to the technical material presented in the latter part of this document. Persons wishing to comment on the tentative determinations contained in the proposed permit reissuance may do so by the expiration date of the Public Notice. All written comments should be submitted to EPA as described in the Public Comments Section of the attached Public Notice. After the expiration date of the Public Notice, the Director, Water Division, will make final determinations with respect to the permit reissuance. The tentative determinations contained in the draft permit will become final conditions if no substantive comments are received during the public notice period. The permit will become effective 30 days after the final determinations are made, unless a request for an evidentiary hearing is submitted within 30 days after receipt of the final determinations. The proposed NPDES permit and other related documents are on file and may be inspected at the, above address any time between 8:30 a.m. and 4 :00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Copies and .other information may be requested by writing to EPA at the above address to the attention of the Water Permits Section, or by calling (206) 553 -1214. This material is also available from the EPA Alaska Operations Office, Room 537, Federal Building, 222 W. 7th Avenue, #19, Anchorage, Alaska 99513. rage 2 Technical Information I. Applicant International Seafoods of Alaska, Inc. P.O. Box 2997 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 NPDES Permit No. AK- 002666 -2 Facility Contact: David Rogers, General Manager II. Activity International Seafoods of Alaska, Inc. operates a seafood processing facility in Kodiak, Alaska. Seafood is processed year round with, a maximum production of 75 short tons per day of raw seafood. The expected maximum production of each species to be processed is as follows: Species Maximum Daily Production - (short tons /dav) (Pounds /davl Bottomfish 75 (150,000) Herring 75 (150,000) Salmon / 75 (150,000) III. Receiving Waters A. Near Island Channel B. Near Island Channel, Alaska is classified by the Alaska State Water Quality_ Standards as Classes (2)(A)(i)(ii)(iii) (B)(i)(ii),(C) and (D) for use in aquaculture, seafood processing and industrial water supply, contact and secondary water recreation, growth and propagation of fish, shellfish, other aquatic life and wildlife, and harvesting for the consumption of raw mollusks or other raw aquatic life. The state water quality parameters which could be affected by the discharge are dissolved gas, pH, turbidity, oil and , grease, residual chlorine, total suspended solids and settleable solids. IV. page 3 Background A. The original NPDES permit was issued to International Seafoods of Alaska, Inc., effective March 27, 1980. It was modified August 2, 1982, to include effluent limitations for herring fillets and frozen whole herring. The permit expired March 27, 1985. International Seafoods of Alaska, Inc. was issued their current permit, effective September. 27, 1985 and expiring September 27, 1990. The applicant has been operating under the terms and conditions of this permit, as allowed in 40 CFR Part 122.6. On May 15,. 1990, EPA received a complete NPDES permit application from International Seafoods of Alaska, Inc. or a permit to discharge to Near Island Channel, Alaska. B. Existing industrial treatment includes grinding seafood wastes and screening process wastewater. The screened effluent is discharged to Near Island channel. The screened . solids are collected and transported to Kodiak Reduction, Inc. (KRI). In February 1984, the reduction facility was closed, with intent to reopen after reconstruction in March 1986. During this period of inactivity, solid wastes were barged to a designated seafood dumping zone in Chiniak Bay. In March 1990, the reduction facility again closed down operations for a period of four months, wastes were again barged to the seafood dumping zone for disposal. C. Process water, . obtained from the City of Kodiak, is not chlorinated prior to use, but a chlorine compound is used to sanitize equipment. D. Sanitary wastes are discharged to the Kodiak City municipal treatment plant. E. The facility maintains one industrial outfall line, located 100 feet from the face of the dock, at a depth of 40 feet below the water surface. Only screened effluent is discharged and is characterized by the following: Operation Average Flow Ice Production 12,000 GPD Fish Processing 94,000 GPD Defrost Wastes 18.000 GPD. TOTAL DISCHARGE 124,000 GPD F. Pollutants associated with the discharge are primarily conventional and include pH, total suspended solids, and oil and grease. v. Page 4 A. There are four modifications in the proposed permit which differ significantly from the previously issued NPDES permit. 1. All seafood waste shall be disposed of at a by- product reduction facility. Limited access to the ocean dumping zone is provided for the following: a. Waste which is unsuitable for by- product recovery. b. When the by- product recovery facility is operating at maximum capacity or is closed for repair and /or maintenance and is unable to accept seafood waste. 2. When effluent limitation guidelines (40 CFR 408.202) were established the bottomfish industry in Alaska was primarily halibut, which was brought to the processing facility gutted. The product was headed and frozen and shipped out in that condition. The effluent from this process was quite low in pollutants. In the past several years anew bottomfish industry has emerged in Alaska. Halibut is no longer the dominant bottomfish species processed. Bottomfish such as cod Pollock, and flatfish are harvested in large quantities.. These species are usually brought to the plant whole, where the fish are mechanically butchered. Today's processing of bottomfish involves more extensive butchering and mechanization, therefore it has been determined that Non- Alaskan Mechanized Bottomfish Processing (40 CFR 408.222) more accurately reflect current seafood processing operations. 3. Monitoring residual chlorine is required to assess the impacts of this pollutant in the receiving environment. 4. Not grinding seafood wastes prior to screening was a requirement of the previous permit. To clarify the intent of this requirement the wording has been modified to the following: Seafood wastes shall not be pulverized, ground, chopped or otherwise altered prior to screening. B. The effluent limitations for the screened wastewater from finfish processing are based on Alaskan Mechanized Salmon Processing (40 CFR 408.172), Non - Alaskan. Mechanized Bottomfish Processing(40 CFR 408.222), Alaska Herring Fillet Processing (40 CFR 408.312) and Alaskan Bottomfish Processing guidelines (40 CFR 408.202). VI. Page 5 When more then one species is processed on a sampling day, the effluent limitation for that day is based on the proportion of each species processed. Variable monthly limits are also based on the proportion of each species processed. EPA has determined that this method of determining a variable limit is appropriate, since EPA guidelines (40 CFR 408) are expressed in terms of pounds of pollutant per 1000 pounds of raw product processed. The method to determine the variable limitations and an example calculation are included in Attachments 1 and 2 of the permit. C. No grinding of seafood wastes prior to screening is a best management practice which carries out the intent of the Clean Water Act of reducing the amount of pollutants entering the receiving waters. D. Limitations on pH, visible environmental impacts, and . receiving water accumulations of seafood wastes are based on Alaska State Water Quality Standards. These standards apply to all discharges from the facility, including process and non- process waters. E. Monitoring is required pursuant to 40 CFR 122.44 (i) and is necessary for determining compliance with permit effluent limitations and to evaluate potential water quality impacts resulting from the discharge. Monitoring frequencies are based on the Agency's determination of the minimum sampling required to adequately monitor facility performance. Monitoring results will be reported in monthly Discharge Monitoring Reports. F. Total residual chlorine monitoring of process wastewater is required in the proposed permit. Chlorine is used for disinfection purposes. Monitoring of residual chlorine in the effluent is required to assess the impacts of this pollutant in the receiving. environment. _ G. Processing records are necessary to characterize the type and amount of pollutants discharged to Near Island Channel. Other Requirements A. Non- process wastewater may be discharged through conveyances other than outfall 001. These include cooling water, boiler water, fresh water pressure relief discharges, and water used in live tanks. This authorization is based on the characteristics of the wastewater from these activities. These waste waters are expected to contain relatively minor concentrations of conventional pollutants (TSS, BOD, oil and grease) and small quantities of solids, and are not expected to adversely affect the receiving waters. Page 6 B. Dive surveys in Petersburg (EPA, 1987) and Kodiak (EPA, 1988) have documented water quality . impacts from seafood processing wastes. In Kodiak, divers observed the presence of anoxic sediments, waste accumulations, and bacterial layers over a large area (at least 75 meters in length) at the mouth of Gibson Cove. Based on these findings, an annual dive survey is required in this permit in order to determine compliance with state water quality standards as well as the extent of the impacts on the receiving water due to.the discharge of seafood wastes. The dive is scheduled at the end of the salmon processing season, which is the maximum production period. C. The proposed permit requires all collected solids to be disposed of at a reduction facility. Halibut heads, shellfish waste and other EPA approved seafood waste, which are unsuitable for by- product recovery, may be disposed of at the ocean dumping zone. The permittee may dispose of collected solid waste at the ocean dumping zone provided certification is received from the by- product reduction facility stating the facility is operating at maximum capacity or is closed for repair and /or maintenance and is unable to utilize additional seafood waste. This requirement is necessary to insure maximum recycling of finfish waste and to facilitate accurate monitoring of the ocean dumping zone. D. Notification of changes in processing capacity is required to assure that the EPA and ADEC are notified of any potential increases in the amount of pollutants being. discharged. This will allow an evaluation of the impact of the increased pollutant loading on the receiving waters. E. The re- opener clause, Part I.B.8 of the permit, is required pursuant to 40 CFR 122.62. Compliance with Alaska Water Quality Standards is a required condition of the permit pursuant to Section 301 of the Clean Water Act. . Permit No.: AK- 002666 -2 Application No.: AK- 002666 -2 United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 10' 1200 Sixth Avenue Seattle,, Washington 98101, AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance .with the provisions of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §1251 g .sec., as amended 'by the Water Quality Act of 1987, P.L. 100-4, the "Act ", INTERNATIONAL SEAFOODS OF ALASKA, INC. is authorized to discharge from a seafood processing facility located in Kodiak, Alaska. to receiving waters named Near Island Channel - in accordance with discharge point(s), effluent limitations, monitoring requirements and other conditions set forth herein. This permit shall become effective This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight, Signed this day of Director, Water Division, Region 10 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Page 2 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 002666 -.2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cover Sheet -- Issuance and Expiration Dates I. Effluent Limitations and Monitoring Requirements A. Specific Limitations and Monitoring Requirements B. Other Requirements C. Definitions II. Monitoring, Recording and Reporting Requirements A. Representative Sampling B. Monitoring Procedures C. Reporting of Monitoring Results D. Additional Monitoring by the Permittee E. Records Contents F. Retention of Records G. Twenty -four Hour Notice of Noncompliance Reporting H. Other Noncompliance Reporting I. Inspection and Entry J. Compliance Schedules . Compliance Responsibilities A. Duty to Comply B. Penalties for Violations of Permit Conditions C. Need to Halt or Reduce Activity not a Defense D. Duty to Mitigate E. Proper Operation and Maintenance F. Removed Substances G. Bypass of Treatment Facilities H. Upset Conditions I. Toxic Pollutants IV. General Requirements A. Changes in Discharge of Toxic Substances B. Planned Changes C. Anticipated Noncompliance D. Permit Actions E. Duty to Reapply F. Duty to Provide Information G. Other Information H. Signatory Requirements I. Availability of Reports J. Oil and Hazardous Substance Liability K. Property Rights L. Severability M. Transfers N. State Laws ATTACHMENT 1 ATTACHMENT 2 FIGURE 1 Page 3 of 20 Permit No.: AR- 002666 -2 EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS A. Specific Limitations & Monitoring Regpir-ements., During the effective term of this permit, the.permittee is authorized to discharge process wastewater from the processing of bottomfish (such as rockfish, pollock, and cod), halibut, and salmon to Near Island Channel from outfall 001. Treatment of process wastewater prior to discharge shall be accomplished through the use of fine mesh screening (1 mm) or equivalent technology. Seafood wastes shall not be pulverized, chopped, ground or otherwise altered prior to screening. 1. Processing discharges shall be limited as specified below (limitations are dependent upon the raw products processed on the day samples are collected): Total Suspended Solids Oil and Grease Daily Max. Monthly Avg. Daily Max. Monthly Avg. Species .Halibut (and other headed /gutted bottomfish) (lbs /1000 lbs)* Mechanized Bottomfish (lbs /1000 lbs) *, Alaskan Mechanized Salmon (lbs /1000 lbs)* Herring - Fillet (including roe recovery) (lbs /10001bs)* Multiple Species (lbs /1000 lbs)* 3.1 1.9 22 12 - 44 . 26 32 24 4.3 - 0.56 9.9 3.9 29 11 27 10, (See Attachment 1) Daily discharges shall be calculated as follows: *lbs pollutant /1,000 lbs raw product = (flow. mgdl X (conc. of pollutant. (total lbs processed during the NOTE: An example calculation is included in mg/1) X (8.3401 sampling day) Attachment 2. Page 4 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 002666 -2 Environmental Effects a. The pH shall not be less than 6.5 standard units nor greater than 8.5 standard units. b. There shall be no discharge of floating solids, visible foam, or oily wastes which produce a sheen on the surface of the receiving water. c. There shall be no accumulation of seafood . processing wastes on the shoreline. d. There shall be no accumulation of wastes on the bottom of the receiving water. 3. Monitoring requirements Effluent monitoring shall be conducted as follows: Parameter, Frequency Sample Type Units Flow Daily 24 -Hour Record mgd TSS Weekly 24 -Hour Composite mg /1 Oil and Grease* Weekly Grab mg /1 Settleable Weekly 24 -Hour Composite ml /1 Solids Residual Chlorine Weekly Grab mg /1 pH Waste Handling System Weekly Daily Grab Standard Units gsgy * Test using the Collins \Tenny Method a. Samples shall be taken from the effluent stream after treatment and prior to its discharge to the receiving, water. b. At least one half 'of the residual . chlorine samples will be taken during or immediately after the plant sanitation procedure. c. Daily flow shall be recorded on the same day effluent samples are taken. ■ Page 5 of 20 • Permit No.: AK- 002666 -2 4. Receiving Water. Inspections The water surface shall be visually inspected each week for floating solids, garbage, grease, foam and visible oil sheen. Results from these inspections shall be reported . with each. monthly Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR). 5. Processing Records The permittee shall report daily processing volumes as part of the. monthly Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR). The following parameters shall be reported: a. Quantity of raw seafood processed per day, by species (pounds). b. Type and ,quantity of finished product per day, by species (pounds). c. Estimate of quantity of seafood wastes disposed of via reduction facility (pounds). B. Other Requirements. 1. Sanitary Wastewater Sanitary wastes shall be discharged to the Kodiak municipal treatment facility. The discharge of non - domestic wastewater to the city sanitary wastewater treatment facility is prohibited unless prior approval is obtained from the operator of that facility. 2. Non - Process Wastewater Cooling water, boiler water, freshwater pressure relief discharges, and water used in live tanks may be discharged through conveyances other than outfall 001 provided the limitations in Part I.A.2 are met. Page 6 of 20' Permit No.: AK- 002666 -2 Dive Surveys Underwater dive surveys at outfall 001 shall be conducted once per year. Dive surveys shall be conducted within seven days after the termination of salmon processing but no later than October 15. The diver shall inspect the area under the dock as well as the outfall along its entire length. The permittee shall submit a dive survey report to EPA and ADEC no later than thirty days after each dive. The report shall include the following information: a. Location (including distance from shore and compass. orientation), depth and condition of the outfall line (including presence, size, and location of any breaks or cracks). b. Water depth at the end of the outfall pipe. c. Inspection of the area at the end of the outfall pipe and documentation of the type, depth, areal extent, estimated volume, and sizes of particles of any waste accumulation. d. A plan view drawing (to scale) indicating the location of the dock, outfall pipe, prominent bottom features such as depressions, pockets, and large rocks, secondary slurry zones, and any area where seafood wastes have accumulated. The drawing shall also include the location, number and species of benthic organisms observed in areas adjacent to the outfall and an indication of whether the organisms observed are alive, dead or stressed. e. Types of substrate in and adjacent to the outfall area. f. Video tape of dive showing all features listed in parts a,c, and d. 4. Waste Disposal Practices a. Disposal of all solid processing wastes, with the exception of waste products listed in part.I.B.4.b., shall be to a by- product recovery facility, unless the permittee meets the requirements of part I.B.4.C.. b. Halibut heads, shellfish wastes, and other seafood wastes, as approved by EPA, which are unsuitable for processing at a by- product recovery facility may be disposed of at the ocean dumping zone identified in part I.B.4.d., and figure 1 of this permit. Page . 7 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 002666 -2 The permittee may submit a written request, to EPA, to have a species of fish classified as unsuitable for processing at a by- product recovery facility. If EPA approves the permittee's request and classifies a species of fish as unsuitable for processing at a by- product recovery facility, that classification shall remain in effect for the term of this permit. c. In the event the permittee is unable to dispose of collected seafood waste by means of by- product recovery, because the recovery facility was operating at maximum capacity or was closed for repair and /or maintenance and was unable to utilize additional seafood waste, the permittee may dispose of said waste in the ocean dumping zone. The permittee shall provide the following information to EPA with the monthly Discharge Monitoring Report for each disposal activity: 1, The permittee must obtain certification from the . by- product recovery facility stating: • the recovery facility was operating at maximum capacity or was closed for repair and /or maintenance and was unable to utilize additional seafood waste and • the date the seafood.waste was not accepted at the by- product recovery facility. 2. Estimate of quantity of seafood waste disposed of at the ocean dumping zone. 3. Name and address of company responsible for barging said waste to the seafood dumping zone. 4. Latitude and longitude of area where wastes were disposed in the ocean dumping zone. d. The ocean dumping zone is generally bordered by the Base Line to the east and the fifty (50) fathom line plotted on U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Map No. 8534. Page 8 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 002666 -2 Notification of Changes in Capacity The permittee shall give notice to the Director and ADEC of any planned physical alterations or operational changes to the permitted facility which will result in the processing of more than the following amounts of raw seafood in a single day: Species Maximum Daily Production Bottomfish 150,000 pounds Salmon 150,000 pounds Herring 150,000 pounds Notification shall be given at least ninety (90) days prior to implementation of the planned changes. 6. Reopener Clause If effluent limitation guidelines applicable to this facility are promulgated that contain limits different from those contained in this permit, the permit shall be modified to reflect the limits in the guidelines. If there is evidence indicating potential or realized impacts on water quality due to the discharge of seafood processing wastewater, the permit may be modified to include different effluent limitations and /or additional monitoring requirements. 7. Alaska Water Quality Standards All discharges shall be in compliance with Alaska Water Quality Standards (18 AAC 70). C. Definitions. 1. "Accumulation" refers to the presence of any measurable amount of seafood waste present on the bottom substrate. For purposes of this permit, measurable is defined as a thickness of one centimeter or more. 2. "Bypass" means the intentional diversion of waste streams from any portion of a treatment facility. 3. "Daily Discharge" means the discharge of a pollutant measured during a calendar day or any 24 -hour period that reasonably represents the calendar day for purposes of sampling. For pollutants with limitations expressed in units of mass, the "daily discharge" is calculated as the total mass of the pollutant discharged over the day. For pollutants with limitations expressed in other units of measurement, the "daily discharge" is calculated as the average measurement of the pollutant over the day. . . r' ya a j °s..0" Page 9 of. 20 .Permit No.: AK- 002666 -2 4. "Daily Maximum" discharge means the highest allowable "daily discharge ". 5. "Grab" sample is a single sample or measurement taken at a specific time or over as short a period of time as is feasible. 6. "Monthly Average" see Attachment 2, page 3 of this permit.. 7. "Quantity of Waste" is calculated as follows: Quantity of Waste. = (Quantity of Raw Seafood) (Quantity of Finished Product). 8. "Severe Property Damage" means substantial physical damage to property, damage to the treatment facilities which causes them to become inoperable, or substantial and permanent loss of natural resources which can reasonably be expected to occur in the absence of a bypass. Severe property damage does not mean economic loss caused by delays in production. 9. "24 -Hour Composite" sample shall mean a flow proportioned mixture of not less than 8 discrete aliquots. Each aliquot shall be a grab sample of not less than 100 ml and shall be collected and stored in accordance with procedures prescribed in the most recent edition of Standard Methods for the'Examination of Water and Wastewater. 10. "Upset" means an exceptional incident in which there is unintentional and temporary . noncompliance with technology based permit effluent limitations because of factors beyond the reasonable control of the permittee. An upset does not include noncompliance to the extent caused by operational error, improperly designed treatment facilities, inadequate treatment facilities, lack of preventive maintenance, or careless or improper operation. II. MONITORING, RECORDING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. A. Representative Sampling. Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirements established under Part I shall be collected from the effluent stream prior to discharge into the receiving waters. Samples and measurements shall be. representative of the volume and nature of the monitored discharge. Monitoring Procedures. Monitoring must be conducted according to test procedures approved under 40 CFR Part 136, unless other test procedures have been specified in this permit. C. Reporting of Monitoring Results. Monitoring results shall be summarized each month on the Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) for (EPA No. 3320 -1). The reports shall . "be submitted monthly and are to be postmarked by the 10th day of the following month. Page 10 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 002666 -2 Legible copies of these, and all other reports, shall be signed and certified in accordance with the requirements of Part IV.H.. Signatory Reauiremsnts, and submitted to the Director, Water Division and the State agency at the following addresses: original to: United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 10 1200 Sixth Avenue, WD -135 Seattle, Washington 98101 copy to: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC) Southcentral Region 3601 'C' Street, Suite 1334 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 D. Additional Monitoring by the Permittee. If the permittee monitors any pollutant more frequently than required by this permit, using test procedures approved under 40 CFR 136 or as specified in this permit, the results of this monitoring shall be included in the calculation and reporting of the data submitted in the DMR. Such increased frequency shall also be indicated. E. Records Contents. Records of monitoring information shall include: 1. The date, exact place, and time of sampling or measurements; 2. The individual(s) who performed the sampling or measurements; The date(s) analyses were. performed; 4. The individual(s) who performed the analyses; The analytical techniques or methods used; and 6. The results of such analyses. Retention of Records,. The permittee shall retain records of all monitoring information, including all calibration, and maintenance records and all original strip chart recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation, copies of all reports required by this permit, and records of all data used to complete the application for this permit, for a period of at least three years from the date of the sample, measurement, report or application. This period may be extended by request of the Director or ADEC at any time. Data collected on -site, copies. of Discharge Monitoring Reports, and a copy of this NPDES permit must be maintained on- site during the duration of activity at the permitted location. Page 11 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 002666 -2 Twenty -four Hour Notice of Noncompl &ance Reporting. 1. The following occurrences of noncompliance shall be reported by telephone within 24 hours from the time the permittee becomes aware of the circumstances: a. Any noncompliance which may endanger health or the environment; b. Any unanticipated bypass which exceeds any effluent limitation in the permit (See Part III.G.. Bypass of Treatment Facilities.); Any upset which exceeds any effluent limitation in the permit (See Part III.H.. Upset Conditions.); or d. Violation of a maximum daily discharge limitation for any of the pollutants listed in the permit to be reported within 24 hours. A written submission shall also be provided within five days of the time that the permittee becomes aware of the circumstances. The written submission shall contain: c. a. A description of the noncompliance and its cause; b. The period of noncompliance, including exact dates and times;. c. The estimated time noncompliance is expected to continue if it has not been corrected; and d. Steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent reoccurrence of the noncompliance. 3. The Director may waive the written report on a case -by -case' basis if the oral report has been received within 24 hours by the Water Compliance Section in Seattle, Washington, by phone, (206) 553 - 1213. 4. Reports shall be submitted to the addresses in part II.C.. Reportina of Monitoring Results. Other Noncompliance Reporting. Instances of noncompliance not required to be reported within 24 hours shall be reported at the time that monitoring reports for Part II.C. are submitted. The reports shall contain the information listed in Part II.G.2. Page.12 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 002666 -2 Inspection and Entry. The permittee shall allow the Director, ADEC, or an authorized representative (including an authorized contractor acting as a representative of the. Administrator), upon the presentation of credentials and other documents as may be required by law, to: 1. Enter upon the permittee's premises where a regulated facility or activity is located or conducted, or where records must be kept under the conditions of this permit; 2. Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the conditions of this permit; Inspect at reasonable times any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and control equipment), practices, or operations regulated or required under this permit; and 4. Sample or monitor at reasonable times, for the purpose of assuring permit compliance or as otherwise authorized by the Act, any substances or parameters at any location. J. Compliance Sc edules. Reports of compliance or noncompliance with, or any progress reports on interim and final requirements contained in any Compliance Schedule of this permit (Part I) shall be submitted no later than 10 days following each schedule date. III. COMPLIANCE RESPONSIBILITIES A. Duty to Comply. The permittee must comply with all conditions of this permit. Any permit noncompliance constitutes a violation of the Act and is grounds for enforcement action; for permit termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification;. or for denial of a permit renewal application. The permittee shall give advance notice to the Director and ADEC of any planned changes in the permitted facility or activity which may result in noncompliance with permit requirements. B. penalties for Violations of Permit Conditions. 1. Civil. Penalty. The Act provides that any person who violates a permit condition implementing Sections 301, 302, 306, 307, 308, 318, or 405 of the Act shall be subject to a civil penalty, not to exceed $25,000 per day for each violation. Criminal Penalties: a. Negligent Violations. The Act provides that any person who negligently violates a permit condition implementing Sections 301, 302, 306, 307, 308, 318, or 405 of the Act shall be punished by a fine of not less than $2,500 nor more than $25,000 per day of violation, or by imprisonment for not more than 1 year, or both. Page 13 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 002666 -2 b. Knowing Violations. The Act provides that any person who knowingly violates a permit condition implementing Sections 301, 302, 306, 307, 308, 318, or 405 of the Act shall be punished by a fine of not . less than $5,000 nor more than $50,000 per day of violation, or by imprisonment for not more than 3 years, or by both. c. Knowing Endangerment. The Act provides that any person . who knowingly violates a permit condition implementing Sections 301, 302, 306, 307, 308, 318, or 405 of the Act, and who knows at that time that he thereby places another person in imminent danger of death or serious bodily injury, shall, upon conviction, be subject to a fine of not more than $250,000 or imprisonment of not more than 15 years, or both. A person which is an organization shall, upon conviction of violating this subparagraph, be subject to a fine of not more than $1,000,000. d. False Statements. The Act provides that any person who knowingly makes any false material statement, representation, or certification in any application, record, report, plan, or other' document filed or required to be maintained under this Act or who knowingly falsifies, tampers with, or renders inaccurate any monitoring device or method required to be maintained under this Act, shall upon conviction, be punished by a fine of not more that $10,000, or by imprisonment for not more than 2 years, or by both. Except as provided in permit conditions in Part III.G.. Bypass of Treatment Facilities and Part III.H.. Upset Conditions, nothing in this permit shall be construed to relieve the permittee.of the civil or criminal penalties for noncompliance. C. Need to Halt or Reduce Activity not a Defense. It shall not be a defense for a permittee in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the conditions of this permit. D. Duty to Mitigate. The permittee shall take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any discharge in violation of this permit which has a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting human health or the environment. Page 14 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 002666 -2. E. proper Operation and Maintenance. The permittee shall at all times properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems of treatment and control (and related appurtenances) which are installed or used by the permittee to achieve compliance with the conditions of this permit. Proper operation and maintenance also includes adequate laboratory controls and appropriate quality assurance procedures. This provision requires the operation of back -up or auxiliary facilities or. similar systems which are installed by a permittee only when the operation is necessary to achieve compliance with the conditions of the permit. Removed Substances.. Solids, sludges, filter backwash, or other pollutants removed in the course of treatment or control of wastewater shall be disposed of in a manner such as to prevent any pollutant from such materials from entering navigable waters. Bypass of Treatment Facilities: 1. Bypass not exceeding limitations. The permittee may allow any bypass to occur which does not cause effluent limitations to be exceeded,, but only if it also is for essential maintenance to assure efficient operation. These bypasses are not subject to the provisions of paragraphs 2 and 3 of this section. 2. Notice: a. Anticipated bypass. If the permittee knows in advance of the need for a bypass, it shall submit prior notice, if possible at least 10 days before the date of the bypass. b. Unanticipated bypass. The permittee shall submit notice of an unanticipated bypass as required under Part II.G.. Twenty-four Notice of Noncompliance, Reporting. 3. Prohibition of bypass. a. .Bypass is prohibited and the Director or ADEC may take enforcement action against a permittee for a bypass, unless: (1) The bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life, personal injury, or Severe property damage; Page 15 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 002666 -2 (2) There were no feasible alternatives to the bypass, such as the use of auxiliary treatment facilities, retention of untreated wastes, or maintenance during normal periods of equipment downtime. This condition is not satisfied ' if adequate back -up equipment should have been installed in the exercise of reasonable-engineering judgment to prevent a bypass which occurred during normal periods of equipmentidowntime or preventive maintenance; and (3) The permittee submitted notices as required under paragraph 2 of this section. b. The Director and ADEC may approve an anticipated bypass, after considering its adverse effects, if the Director and ADEC determine that it will meet the three conditions listed above in paragraph 3.a. of this section. H. Upset Conditions. 1. Effect of an upset. An upset constitutes an affirmative defense to an action brought for noncompliance with such ' technology based permit effluent limitations if the requirements of paragraph 2 of this section are met. No determination made during administrative review of claims that noncompliance was caused by upset, and before an action for noncompliance, is final administrative action subject to judicial review. 2. Conditions necessary for a demonstration of upset. A permittee who wishes to establish the affirmative defense of upset shall demonstrate, through properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs, or other relevant evidence that: a. An upset occurred and that the permittee can identify the cause(s) of the upset; b. The permitted facility was at the time being properly operated; The permittee submitted notice of the upset as required under Part II.G.. Twentv -four Hour Notice of. Noncompliance Reportina; and d. The permittee complied with any remedial measures required under Part III.D., Duty to Mitigate. Burden of proof. In any enforcement proceeding, the permittee seeking to establish the occurrence of an upset has the burden of proof. c Page 16 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 002666 -2 I. Toxic Pollutants. The permittee shall comply with effluent standards or prohibitions established under Section 307(a) of the Act for toxic pollutants within the time provided in the regulations that establish those standards or prohibitions, even, if the permit has not yet been. modified to incorporate the requirement. IV. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS A. Changes in Discharge of Toxic Substances. Notification shall be provided to the Director and ADEC as soon as the permittee knows of, or has reason to believe: 1. That any activity has occurred or will occur which would result in the discharge, on a routine or frequent basis, of any toxic pollutant which is not limited in the permit, if that discharge will exceed the highest of the following • "notification levels ": a. One hundred micrograms per liter (100 ug /1); b. Two hundred micrograms per liter (200 ug /1) for acrolein and acrylonitrile, five hundred micrograms per liter (500 ug /1) for 2,4- dinitrophenol and for. 2- methy1-4, 6- dinitrophenol; and one milligram per liter (1 mg /1) for antimony; c. Five (5) times the maximum concentration value reported for that pollutant in the permit application in accordance with 40 CFR 122.21(g)(7); or d. The level established by the Director in accordance with 40 CFR 122.44(f). 2. That any activity has occurred or will occur which would result in any discharge, on a non - routine or infrequent basis, of a toxic pollutant which is not limited in the permit, if that discharge will exceed the highest of the following "notification levels ": a. Five hundred micrograms per liter. (500 ug /1); b. One milligram per liter (1 mg /1) for antimony; c. Ten (10) times the maximum concentration value reported for that pollutant in the permit application in accordance with 40 CFR 122.21(g)(7); or d. The level established by the Director in accordance with 40 CFR 122.44(f). .Page 17 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 002666 -2. B. Planned Changes. The permittee shall give notice to the Director and ADEC as soon as possible of any planned physical alterations or additions to the permitted facility. Notice is required only when: 1. The alteration or addition to a permitted facility may meet one of the criteria for determining whether a facility is a new source as determined in'40 CFR 122.29(b); or 2. The alteration or_addition could significantly change the nature or increase the quantity of pollutants discharged. This notification applies to pollutants which are subject neither to effluent limitations in the permit, nor to notification requirements under Part IV.A.1. C. Anticipated Noncompliance. The permittee shall also give advance notice to the Director and ADEC of any planned changes in the permitted facility or activity which may result in noncompliance with permit requirements. D. Permit Actions. This permit may be modified, revoked and reissued, or terminated for cause. The filing of a request by the permittee for a permit modification, revocation and reissuance, or termination, or a notification of planned changes or anticipated noncompliance, doe's not stay any permit condition. E. Duty to Reapply. If the permittee wishes to continue an activity regulated by this permit after the expiration date of this permit, the permittee must apply for and obtain a new permit. The application should be submitted at least 180 days before the expiration date of this permit. F. Duty to Provide Information. The permittee shall furnish to the Director and ADEC, within a reasonable time, any information which the Director �r ADEC may request to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and reissuing, or terminating this permit, or to determine compliance with this permit. The permittee shall also furnish to the Director or ADEC, upon request, copies of records required to be kept by this permit. G. Other Information. when the permittee becomes aware that it failed to submit any relevant facts in a permit application, or submitted incorrect information in a permit application or any report to the Director or ADEC, it shall promptly submit such facts or information. Page 18 of 20 -- Permit No.: AR- 002666 -2 H. Signatory Requirements. All applications, reports or information submitted to the Director. and ADEC shall be signed and certified. 1. All permit applications shall be signed as follows: a. For a corporation: by a responsible corporate officer. b. For a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the proprietor, respectively. c. For a municipality, state, federal, or other public agency: by either a principal executive officer or ranking elected official. 2. All reports required by the permit and other information requested by the Director or ADEC shall be signed by a person described above or by a duly authorized representative of that person. A person is a duly authorized representative only if: a. The authorization is made in writing by Pa person described above and submitted to the Director and ADEC, and b. The authorization specified either an individual or a position having responsibility for the overall operation of the regulated facility or activity, such as the position of plant manager, operator of a well or a well field, superintendent, position of equivalent responsibility, or an individual or position having overall responsibility for environmental matters for the company. (A duly authorized representative may thus be either a named individual or any individual occupying a named position.) 3. Changes to authorization. If an authorization under paragraph IV.H.2. is no longer accurate because a different individual or position has responsibility for the overall operation of the facility, a new authorization satisfying the requirements of paragraph IV.H.2. must be submitted to the Director and ADEC prior to or together with any reports, information, or applications to be signed by an authorized representative. Page 19 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 002666 -2 4. Certification. Any person signing a document under this section shall make the following certification: "I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations." Availability of Reports. Except for data determined to be confidential under 40 CFR Part 2, all reports prepared in accordance with the terms of this permit shall be available for public inspection at the offices of the Director and ADEC. As required by the Act, permit applications, permits and effluent data shall not be considered confidential. Oil and Hazardous Substance Liability. Nothing in this permit shall be construed to preclude the, institution of any legal action or relieve the permittee from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties to which the permittee is or may be subject under Section 311 of the Act. K. Property Rights. The issuance of this permit does not convey any property rights of any sort, or any exclusive privileges, nor does it authorize any injury to private property or any invasion of personal rights, nor any infringement of federal, state or local laws or regulations. Severability. The provisions of this permit are severable, and if any provision of this permit, or the application of any provision of this permit to any circumstance, is held invalid, the application of such provision to other circumstances, and the remainder of this permit, shall not be affected thereby. Transfers. This permit may be automatically transferred to a new permittee if: 1. The current permittee notifies the Director at least 30 days in advance of the proposed transfer date; 2. The notice includes a written agreement between the existing and new permittees containing a specific date for transfer of permit responsibility, coverage, and liability between them; and Page 20 of 20 Permit No.: AR- 002666 -2 The Director does not notify the existing permittee and the proposed new permittee of his or her intent to modify, or revoke and reissue the permit. If this notice is not received, the transfer is effective on the date specified in, the agreement mentioned in paragraph 2 above. N. State Laws. Nothing in this permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal action or relieve the permittee from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties established pursuant to any applicable state law or regulation under authority preserved by Section 510 of the Act. ATTACHMENT 1 Limitations for Multiple Species Processing Effluent limitations for the processing of multiple species are derived using the following "generic" equation: Limit in lbs /1000.1bs = (Bottomfish Limit)(% Bottomfish) + (Crab Limit)(% Crab) + (Herring Limit) Herring) where, % Bottomfish % Crab % Herring % HB Salmon % Mech Salmon % Scallop and, Bottomfish Limit = Effluent limitation in Part I.A.1. for bottomfish processing Crab Limit = Effluent limitation in Part I.A.i. for processing Herring Limit = Effluent limitation in Part I.A. for herring processing + (HB Salmon Limit)($ HB Salmon) + (Mech Salmon Limit)(% Mech Salmon) + (Scallop Limit)($ Scallop) = Amount of bottomfish processed divided by the total amount of seafood processed = (Amount of Bottomfish) / (Amount of Raw Seafood) = Amount of crab processed divided by the total amount of seafood processed = (Amount of Crab) / (Amount of Raw Seafood) = Amount of herring processed divided by the total amount of seafood processed = (Amount of Herring) / (Amount of Raw Seafood). = Amount of hand-butchered salmon divided by the total amount of seafood processed = (Amount of HB Salmon) / (Amount of Raw Seafood) = Amount of mechanized salmon divided by the total amount of seafood processed _. (Amount of Mech.' Salmon) / (Amount of Raw Seafood) = Amount of scallop processed divided by the total amount of seafood processed = (Amount of Scallop) / (Amount of Raw Seafood) 2 , HB Salmon Limit. = Effluent limitation in Part I.A. for hand - butchered salmon Mech Salmon Limit = Effluent limitation in Part I.A. for mechanized salmon processing Scallop Limit = Effluent limitation in Part I.A. for scallop processing Two pollutants are limited in the permit, TSS and Oil and Grease. Each pollutant is limited on a monthly average and daily maximum basis. Therefore, by substituting the limitation for each species in the generic equation above, we can generate the following four limitations for Multiple Species processing: TSS - Monthly Average TSS - Daily Maximum Oil and Grease - Monthly Average Oil and Grease - Daily Maximum TSS - Monthly Average Limitation = 12(% Bottomfish) + 3.9(% Crab) + 24(% Herring) + 1.6(% HB Salmon) + 26(% Mech Salmon) + 1.4(% Scallop) NOTE: Processing percentages are calculated over the month TSS - Daily Maximum Limitation = '22( %.Bottomfish) + 12(% Crab) + 32($ Herring) + 2.6(% HB Salmon) + 44(% Mech Salmon) + 6.6(% Scallop) NOTE: Processing percentages are calculated over the sampling day Oil and Grease - Monthly Average Limitation = 3.9(% Bottomfish) + 0.42(% Crab) + 10(% Herring) + 0.19(% HB Salmon) + 11(% Mech Salmon) + 0.24(% Scallop) NOTE: Processing percentages are calculated over the month Oil and Grease - Daily Maximum Limitation = 9.9(% Bottomfish) + 1.3(% Crab) + 27(% Herring) + 0.31(% HB Salmon) + 29(% Mech Salmon) + 7.7(% Scallop) NOTE: Processing percentages are calculated over the sampling day. These limitations shall be calculated and included in an attachment tc the monthly DMRs. ATTACHMENT 2 Example of Calculations to Determing Compliance With the Permit Limits These are sample calculations of plant discharge (lbs /1000 lbs) values which shall be compared to limitations in Part I.A.1. to determine compliance. Given: Discharges were sampled four days during the month of June 1988. Hand- butchered salmon and bottomfish were processed. The following table provides data for the month of June 1988. Pounds of Raw Product Date Flow. MGD TSS C©nc..ma /1 Ha Salmon Bottomfish 6/2/88. 0.075 36.8 - - - 10,000 6/9/88 0.098 41.5 - - - 23,070 6/16/88 0.127 39.4 6,155 60,000 6/27/88 0.077 47.5 1,210 Daily Maximum Calculations Step 1. Determine the Daily Maximum discharge for TSS for each day samples are collected. Daily Maximum discharge (in lbs /1000 lbs) equals the measured effluent flow (mgd), multiplied by the measured effluent concentration (mg /1), multiplied by a conversion factor (8,340), . and divided by the total amount of raw seafood processed (lbs). Note that the flow, concentration, and amount of seafood processed shall be measured over the same. 24 -hour period. Daily Maximum = (flow) (concentration) (8. 340) (Daily Production) Therefore, 6/2/88 Daily Maximum = ( 0. 075mgd)(36.8mg/1)(8,340)/10,000 lbs = 2.30 lbs /1.000 lbs 6/9/88, Daily Maximum = ( 0. 098mgd)(41.5mg/1)(8,340)/23,070 lbs ='1.47 lbs /1.000 lbs 6/16/$ Daily Maximum = ( 0. 127mgd)(39.4mg/1)(8,340)/66,155 lbs = 0.63 lbs /1.000 lbs 6/27/88 Daily Maximum = ( 0 .077mgd)(47.5mg/1)(8,340)/1,210 lbs = 25.2 lbs/1.000 lbs. Daily Maximum calculations shall be made .for each day that samples are collected. Step 2. Determine compliance with applicable daily maximum effluent limitations. To determine compliance, the above calculated. Daily Maximum discharge value shall be compared to the applicable Daily Maximum limit in Part I.A.1. of the permit. The applicable limitation. from Part I.A.1. is dependent upon whether only hand - butchered salmon, only bottomfish, or both hand- butchered salmon and bottomfish are processed on the day of sampling. Since only bottomfish is processed on 6/2/88 and 6/9/88, these calculated daily maximum discharge values shall be compared to the daily maximum TSS limitation in Part I.A.1., for bottomfish, of 22 lbs /1,000 lbs. The same type of comparison can be made for. the 6/27/88 calculation where only hand - butchered salmon is processed. Because more than one species of seafood is processed on 6/16/88, the calculated daily maximum TSS discharged must be dompared to a variable limitation which is derived based upon a proportion of each seafood species processed. This variable Daily Max TSS Limitation is calculated as follows: Limitation = 2.6(% HB Salmon) + 22(% Bottomfish)' = 2.6(6,155/66,155) + 22(60,000/66,155) = 20.2 lbs /1000 lbs This equation is defined in detail in Attachment 1 of the permit. CONCLUSION DATE TSS DAILY. MAX TSS DAILY MAX LIMITATION,. (LBS /1000'LBS) (PART I.A.1..OF PERMIT) (LBS /1000 LBS) 6/2/88. 2.30 . 22 6/9/88 1.47 22 6/16/88 0.63 20.2 6/27/88 25.20 2.6 From the above information, it can be seen that the facility was not in compliance on 6/27/88. J. Monthlv Average Calculations. Step 1. Determine the Average Monthly discharge for TSS (for June 1988) The Average Monthly TSS discharge equals the summation of all Daily Maximum discharge values calculated during the time period covered by the DMR in question (June), divided by the total production. Therefore, Monthly Average = [(0.075 mgd)(36.8 mg /1) + (0.098 1mgd) (41.5 mg /1) + (0.127 mgd)(39.4 mg /I) + (0.077 mgd)(47.5 mg /1) ] x (8,344/(10,000 + 23,070 + 66,155 + 1,210) = 1.3 lbs /1000 lbs Monthly Average calculations shall be made each month. Step 2. Determine compliance with applicable monthly average effluent limitations. To determine compliance, the above calculated Monthly Average discharge value shall be compared to the applicable Monthly Average limitation in Part I.A.1. of the permit. The applicable limitation from Part I.A.1. is dependent upon whether only hand- butchered salmon, only bottomfish, or both hand - butchered salmon and bottomfish are processed on any day that samples are collected, during the month in question. For this example, since both hand - butchered salmon and bottomfish are processed during the sampling period in the month of, June the above calculated Monthly Average TSS discharge must be compared to a variable limitation which is based upon a proportion of each seafood species processed. This variable Monthly Average TSS limitation is calculated as follows: Limitation " = 1.6(% HB Salmon) + 12(% Bottomfish) = 1.6(7,365/100,435) + 12(93,070/100,435) = 11.2 lbs /1.000 lbs This equation is defined in detail in Attachment 1 of the permit. CONCLUSION DATE TSS MONTHLY AVG TSS MONTHLY AVG LIMITATION (LBS /1000 LBS) PART I.A.1. OF PERMIT (LBS /1000 LBS) 6/2/88 1.3 11.2 THRU 6/27/88 4 From the above information, it can be seen that the facility was in compliance for the TSS Monthly Average limitations._ NOTE: The above example only examines the TSS results. The same calculations apply to Oil & Grease. Calculations shall be made during each month and submitted with the DMRs for the month in question. 1.11411 / �1.11111r�1a ri t•l NI 1.• • r• i4 41 _ '�11`• ♦ �� N 4.0 • 14 Sr ' 4• 11 11 164. •n n =4.'4/.13 "4.4: •,... . o 3s I • Is /1 • •• 1 111 so 1. 1:• r r 11 .._ •■■ ■•■■■• 1'- 1: •1 • t 4S1 Si • •.a I N • • i:..N. a.1/ • ter )1 . 41la•• .5;,. lb. 13 •i off �t .a�;��.:• '•., tt.•lN ?2•irr.. M4■ la a, 1k11•r 11 1 =! 1 11 x•.1 /1.I :ali 1180..4 1114, • 16 -ma • 11 l at: a $$ 34 u;i 1ffi• al t '/ • . 4•••••1? /1 K t1 '.IIl ills/all/ q1 11 ... "- .• R • • . 14 31 H .r. ~• 1: 16 31 /7► .0 sl ab ' ...Mor vs. r -,.. J.... 1 1j ::6 • 1 a'1 11! O3 4 f1i :16 .. :at 41 fi n. la 3 K r; • /6 36 al SI SS 61 >3 /3 6> la r •. -.. 1s Ns ar I, . • * ,;1` .14 Ia, -. it or ... e: t:!' IN • 14 • 11 s4. 11 16 • IS 1 µ • :1• 41 SEAFOOD uUMI'ii1G ZONE t> 1 . Is 1a 11 1a' 16 u is - Ms M N "•61 1 104 13 1t. . 66 11 o• III - - 11.. as, .14 . 1 t•N �1 14 • 1f - - • I 1 .-_,d1' u 11 RS 1/ t3. M r•*.•4 M4 1 31 C.../ (, �fl - 1 N. 1 As V 11 • t•.M•w i 14 •• i• 11 41 ' 44• • N Ifi• 43 It II .h 11 1s K 14 mss,` !ail alos WO 3 �• •••14 16 t 7.7 1 ;4 gq4.10111 PACticgtQuestionnaire and Certification Statement Please answer all questions. Include taps Cir plan drawings with your packet. An incomplete questionnaire may be returned and will delay the review of your packet. APPLICANT INFORMATION 'W■111•■■■.... ‘)-e.41-r-ogiy-AffFAtrii4-cont:to-kii'totke.;, t:C3 irt e-- aciql Pre0 Lici7 AddrenLe pl ft() P-U. 4'2l\ Aare= qoi I*0 code City Daytime Phone City 0 tar, 1() Zip Cade Daytime Phone PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Provide a brief description of your project and ALL associated facilities (caretaker facilities, etc.): Tti 0- •034 Pi2CCE501■16- 1)LtritaIMM,UE11 J FizzEz ( to( 14/6- ALsc 142.Ecrt St-t IP it-f__14-5 Starting Date for Project r Ending Due for Project tre-ezt_ izzAr-ozedi- ri4g("0-, - PROJECT LOCATION 1. Please give loznion of project. (Include nearest community or identifiable body of land or water.) • Y•E Township Ranp.... Meridian Sectioe 2. Is the project on: (plasm nark wiat ,e) Siam Land- Federal Land Private Lund Municipal Land 3. Project is located in which region of the tate (see attached cup): Northero Southwood Southeao GOVERNMENTAL CURRENT APPROVALS COORDINATION 1. Do you currendy have any Stage or federal approvals far this' project? If yes, please list below. (Note: approval means penult at any other form of authorization.) List state review 1D#, if any. • Approval Trot Approval • Expiration Date S tiPDS.c 002 Ekk Aliquot Pam.. MS MP-Mt E OF MANAGEMENT & BUDGE JUN 26 1990 szfrt-, b, f280 .-mcx DF-C> Dge_ cp FEDERAL APPROVALS 1. Will you be placing structures or fills in any of the following: tidal waters, streams, lakes, or wedandss? * nor are recatifie whigha your propasedproject arra is in a welksai. corms At U.S. Corps of &gingers, Iteplasor, Ormat as (907) 713-2720 for • within& dgernination. If you are mands Anchorage area. call rolling 1 400471-2712. If yes, have you applied for or do you intend to apply for a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE). permit? Please indicate at right 'ar.d give date of submittal Yea No 2. Have you lied for ar do Nacca1P011U don give date of =bed permit, contact EPA at 2 3. Hive you applied for ce do If yes, please list below.. rTh you intend to spply for a U.S. EnvironmenadTrotecUon Agency Fliminstion Sys�m (NPDES) permit? Please indicate at ri t . (Note: For information regarding the need for a NPDE you intend to apply for permits from any other federal agency? Approval Type - DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES APPROVALS Date submitted (or intend to submit) 1. Is the proposed project on state-owned land Or will you need to MOSS state lands for access? Now 1* w1 award *wok. the dose has jurisdiction over most had below a ordinary kills wow Woe of stromis,, rivers, lakes, mid moan NOM( line seaward for dim NOW. • 2. Is any portion of your project placed below the ordinary high warm line of a stream, river, lake, cr mean high water line of a saltwater body? 3. Will you be dredging? If yes, location of dredging is: Township Range.... Maidian Se • Location of disposal site for dredged materials (describe): Township Range--. Meridian-. Sectke 4. Will you be Oiling with rock, sand or gravel? If yes, amount? • Location of source: Township --- Ram Maria= • Location of fill site: Township ---. Range Meridian 5. Do you plan to use any of the following gate-owned resources Tlinba• • Will you be harvesting timber from 10 or more acres? If yes, amount? • Location of source:Townihip ---- Range meridian Other Materials • If yes, what material?. buldsni • La:adon of source:Toweship Section • 6. Are you planning so use any fresh water? • If yes, amount (gallons pa day)? • Sauce? • 7. Will you be building or altering a dam? 8. Do you plats to drill a geothermal well? 9. Will you be exploring for or extracting coal? 10. Will you be explains for or extracting minerals on state-owned land? 11. Will you be exploring for or extracting oil and gas on state-owned 1and? 11 12. Will you be investigating or removing historical or archaeological resources on state -owned land? 13. Will the project be located in a unit of the Alaska State Park System? If you answered NO to a0 cordons In this section, you do not need an approval from the Alaska Deperttne■t oIN Resource (DNR). Condow to the next section. U you animated Y!s to ANY gtaastkons in this secdaa, contact DNR to Idendfy and obtain naceraary appikadoo forms. Based on your discussion with DNR, please list (below) the approval type needed and date submitted APPuvr TYPs Der submiand (cr kneed to submit) Have you paid the filing fees required for the DNR permits? If you are not applying for DNR permits, indicate reason below: . 1. (DNR contact) cold me on approvals or permits were required on this project ocher: £* jp Pk 4 T in m DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME APPROVALS no DNR Ezrv 1. Will you be working in a stream, river, or lake? (This include work in running water or co ice, within tie acdve floodplain. on islands, the face of the banks, or the stream tidelands down to mean low tide.) Name of stream or river. , Name of lake: Will you be doing any of the following: a) Building a dam, river training structure or instream impoundment? b) Using the water? c) Diverting or altering the natural channel stream? d) Blocking or damming the stream, (temporarily or permanen e) Changing the water flow or the water channel? 1) Pumping water out of the stream or last.:? g) m ravel, tack, petroleum products, debris, chemicals or wastes of an h) Using the cause es a toad (even when frozen), or crossing the stream with tracked or wheeled vatrleles, log- dogging or excavanon equipment (beckhoes, bulldozers, e3k20( i) Altering or stabilizing the banks? j) Mining or digging in the beds or banks? k) Using explosives? 1) Building a bridge (including an ice bridge)? n2) WVIDO, tl Cu)vCrt Q: Other * ina ze structure n) Constructing a weir? o) Other in-stream structure not mentioned above? Yr wa CD G2' 2. Is your project located in a designated Scue Game Refuge, Critical Habitat Area, or State Game Yes 'ro Sanctuary? ❑ 2( 3. Does your project Include the construction and operation of a salmon hatchery? ❑ [ 4. Does your project affect or is it related to a previously permitted salmoa hatchery? 5. Does your project include the construction of a shellfish or sea vegetable farm? - ❑ 2r If you answered NO to all Ituestions in this section, you do not need an approval from the Alaska Department of Fish and Game (DFG). Continue to the next section. If you answered YES to any of the questions under 1 or 2, contact the Regional DFG Habitat Division Office for Information and application form,. If ou answered YES to questions 3, 4 or S, contact the DFG Private Nonprofit Hatchery Office at the F.RE.D. division headquarters for information and applcadon forme. Based on your discussion with DFG, please list (below) the approval type needed and date submitted Amoral Dm Dese &tinkled (a ahead to eohmk) If you are not applying for permits, indicate reason below: a. (DFG contact) told me on _ (date)•thaat no DFG approvals or permits were required on this project. b. Oilier. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION APPROVALS 1. Willa discharge of wastewater from industrial or commercial operations occur!' (See #2 in ."Federal Approvals" section) 014.yf lit.eityt ¢i4 srr I r- Pc-Awl-7— 2. Do you intend to consuuctrastall or modify any part of a wastewater (sewage or greywater) disposal system? 3. If yes, will the discharge be 5OO gpd or greater? 4. Do you expect to =quest a mixing zone for your proposed project? Uygur warlewertr dlri■tge will exceed Alaska wait quality =dodo, yea may apply far a If ao, Om came DOC ID dicer aformadon required under 18 AAC 70.032. 5. • Will the project tesutt in dredging or disposal of sill in wetlands or placement of a strums in waterway? (Note: your application for this activity to the Corps of Engineers will also serve u your applicatbn to DEC.) 6. Will your project result in the development of a currently unpermitted facility for the disposal of domestic or industrial solid waste? 7. Will your project require the application of oil or pesticides to the surface of the land? 8. srm your project generate air emissions from the following: a) Diesel genertitor. totaling more than 10,000 hp? b) Other fossil ase1-fired electric generaux, furnace, or boiler totaling greater than 10•000 hi). or %WO kWh, or 100,000,000 bni/hr? c) Asphak phut? d) Incinerator burning more than 1000 lbs. per hour? e) Indusuial process? 9. Will you be altering a public wow system? 10. Will your project require offshore drilling r vessel transport of oil, or other peuoleum products as cargo, or include onshore facilities with an effective storage capacity of greater than 10,000 barreb of such products? 11. Will you be subdividing lands into two or more lots (parcels)? If you =wired NO to all uestions in this section, you do not wed a permit or approval from the Alaska Department of Environmental Conserved= (DEC). MAW coodnus to tbs nest secdou. If you answered YES to any of these quesdoos (see 06 Note), 0311tact the DEC Regional OM* for informed= and application forms. Based on your discussion with DEC please list (below) the approval type needed and date submitted. APPlavid TAI• Duo Submitted (co hood io MEW %1's ,t11 If you are not applying for permits, indicate reason below: L (DEC contact) told Ire on approvals or permits were required on this project. no DEC b. Other: Certification Statement The informed= oostabsed herein is true and complete to the best of my imowledge. I certify that =mald tatty complies with, and will be conducted in a manner consistent with, the Aluka PL Due 062( SO Signet= Axilicant at Now Thi oorddegin ormosos is s roqukomou for federal monk oppliorm Fwd agoisoiro =duct* • wavily drat vili dinedy AU= do Goma zoos u required to submit a federal carjamcy docormiosioa per 15 CFR 930, Salim C. To complete your packet, please attach your state permit applications and copies of your federal permit applications to this questiotmaire. United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 10 Park Place Building, 13th Floor 1200 Sixth Avenue, WD -134 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 553 -1214' NOTICE OF PROPOSED REISSUANCE OF NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMITS TO DISCHARGE TO WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES, • NOTICE OF STATE CERTIFICATION, AND NOTICE OF STATE DETERMINATION OF CONSISTENCY WITH THE ALASKA COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Public Notice No.: AK- 000043 -3, AK- 000083 -3, AK- 000036 -1, AK- 000042 -6, AK- 000008 -6, AK- 000035 -3, AK- 002666 -2, AK- 000049 -3, AK- 000082 -5 Public Notice Issuance Date: August 5, 1991 Public Notice Expiration Date: Sapta■bac 3, 1991 1. applicant The following Kodiak seafood processors have applied for reissuance o! their National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits to discharge process wastewater into St. Paul Harbor and Near Island Channel. These waters are classified by the Alaska State Water Quality Standards as class 2A, 2B, 2C, and 2D for use in aquaculture, seafood processing, and industrial water supply; contact and secondary water recreation; growth and propagation of fish, shellfish, aquatic life and wildlife; and harvesting for the consumption of raw mollusks or other raw aquatic life. Fact sheets are available. 1. Alaska Pacific Seafoods, Inc. P.O. Box 31179 Seattle, Wa. 98103 Application No. AK- 000043 -4 2. All Alaskan Seafoods, Inc.(Star of Kodiak) P.O. Box 646 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Application No. AK- 000083 -3 All Alaskan Seafoods, Inc.(Alkod) 101 Marine Way Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Application No. AK- 000036 -1 Page 2 4. East-`Point Seafood Company Building C -3, Fisherman's Terminal' Seattle, Wa. 98119 Application No. AK- 000042 -6 Faros Seafoods, Inc. 325 Shelikof Street Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Application No. AK- 000008 -6 International Seafoods of Alaska, Inc. P.O. Box 2997 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Application No. AK- 000035 -3 7. International Seafoods of Alaska, Inc. P.O. Box 2997 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Application No. AK- 002666 -2 King Crab, Inc. P.O. Box C -70739 Seattle, Wa. 98107 Application No. AK- 000049 -3 9. Western Alaska Fisheries, Inc. 1111 3rd Avenue, Suite 1210 Seattle, Wa 98101 Application No. AK- 000082 -5 2. Tentative Determination The Region 10 Office of the EPA has tentatively determined to reissue a discharge permit to the above listed applicants. State Certification This Notice will also serve as Public Notice of the intent of the State of Alaska, Department of'Environmental Conservation to consider certifying that the subject discharge will comply with the applicable provisions of Section 208(e), 301, 301, 303, 306 and 307 of the Clear. Water Act. The NPDES permit will not be issued until the certification requirements of Section 401 have been met. 4. State Consistency Determination This Notice will also serve as Public Notice of the intent of the State of Alaska, Office of Management and Budget, Division of Governmental Coordination, to review this action for consistency witt the approved Alaska Coastal Management Program. Page 3 5. public Callenta Persons wishing to comment on the tentative determinations contained in the proposed permit or wishing to request that a public hearing be held, may do so in writing, within 30 days of the date of this public notice. A request for a public hearing shall state the nature of the issues to be raised as well as the requester's name, address and telephone number. Comments must be received within this 30 day period to be considered in the formulation of final determinations regarding the application. All comments should include the name, address and telephone number of the commenter and a concise statement of the exact basis of any comment and the relevant facts upon which it is based. All written comments and requests should be submitted to EPA at the above address to the attention of the Director, Water Division. Persons wishing to comment on State Certification should submit written comments within this 30 day period to the State of Alaska, Southcentral Regional Office, Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC), 3601 'C' Street, Suite 1334, Anchorage, Alaska 99503. Persons wishing to comment on the State Determination of Consistency with the Alaska. Coastal Management Program should submit written comments within this 30 day period, to the State of Alaska, Southcentral Regional Office, Office of Management and Budget, Division of Governmental Coordination, 3601 "C' Street, Suite 370, Anchorage, Alaska 99503. Comments should be addressed to the attention of Alaska Coastal Management Program Consistency Review. 6. Administrative Record The proposed NPDES permit and other related documents are on file and may be inspected at the above address any time between 8:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Copies and other information may be requested by writing to the EPA at the above address to the attention of the Water Permits Section, or by calling (206) 553 -1214. This material is also available from the EPA Alaska Operations Office, Room 537, Federal Building, 222 West, 7th Avenue, #19, Anchorage, Alaska 99513. >:`. 01-A35LH OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT-AND BUDGET DIVIBION'OF GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION SOUTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE 431 NORTH FAMUN P.O. BOX AW, SUITE 101 JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811.0165 , PHONE: 4654562 REGISTERED MAIL. RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED SOUTHCENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE 3601 'C' STREET SUITE 370 ANCHORAGE; ALASKA 99503.5930 PHONE: (907) 561-6131 Mr. David L. Rogers International Seafoods of Alaska P.O. Box 2997 Kodiak, AK 99615 Dear Mr. Rogers: March 16, STEVE COWPER GOVERNOR, CENTRAL OFFICE P.O. BOX AW JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811-0165 PHONE: (907) 465-3562 NORTHERN REGIONAL OFFICE 675 SEVENTH AVENUE STATION II FAIRBANKS, ALASKA 99701-4596 PHONE: (907) 451-2818 1990 SUBJECT: KODIAK HARBOR 48 - MODIFICATION STATE I.D. NUMBER AK900306-11A CONCLUSIVE' CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION The Division of Governmental Coordination (DGC) has completed coordinating the review of your proposed modification for consistency with the Alaska Coastal Management Program (ACMP). The proposed modification is to place approximately 50,000 cubic yards, dredge 2,500 cubic yards and construct a steel bulkhead. The specific project components are: A. The existing,wooden dock and bulkhead components would be removed via a shore mounted crane; B. A,steel bulkhead with closed-cell_configuration, with a facing matching that of the existing ISA dock, would be constructed on the northeastern and southwestern ends of the eixisting dock via a barge mounted pile-driver (crane) C. Approximately 2,500 cubic yards of bottom material would be dredged, via a barge mounted backhoe (type) equipment, to lower the eixsting dock face draft to a minimum of 14 feet below mean low low water. This material would be discharged as backfill to the proposed bulkhead; and D. Approximately 50,000 cubic yards of graywacke, obtained from local upland quarries, would be dumped as backfill to the bulkhead. Mr. David L. Rogers 2 Kodiak Harbor 48 - Modification State I. D. No.. AK900306 --11A March 16, 1990 The purpose.of the modification is to provide additional vessel dockage and'iand area for expanded equipment loft. The expanded dock would allow for productive use of the southwest portion of the existing dock which is currently unusable due to a shoal area. Based on the review of your project by the Alaska Departments of Natural Resources, Environmental Conservation, and Fish and Game and the Kodiak Island Borough, the state concurs with your certification that the proiect_is consistent with the ACMP. This consistency determination applies to the following state and federal authorizations as per 6 AAC 50: 1. Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) Certificate of Reasonable Assurance. 2. U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) - Section 10 Permit and Section 404 Permit (N- 780260). If changes to the approved project are proposed prior to or during its siting, construction, or operation, you are required . to contact this office immediately to determine if further review and approval of the revised project is necessary. The state reserves the right to enforce compliance with this conclusive consistency determination if the project is changed in any significant way, or if the actual use differs from the approved use contained in the project description. If appropri- ate, the state may amend the state approvals listed in this conclusive consistency determination. By a copy of this letter we are informing the federal agency reviewing your project of our determination. If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 561 -6131. Sincerely, %;? ' P ty Bielawski Project Review Coordinator Enclosures cc: Wayne Dolezal, DFG Tim Rumfelt, DEC Greg Curney, DNR Bud Cassidy, KIB John Leeds, COE co4/52 MEMORAN_ UM Stat( of Alaska TO: Patty Bielawski Project Coordinator Division of Governmental Coordination Office of Management FROM: C. Wayne Dolezal Habitat Biologist Region II Habitat Division Department of Fish and Game 02-001 A (Rev 11-85) DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME DATE: March 8, 1990 ALE NO.: TELEPHONE NO.: SUBJECT: 267-2284 International - Seafoods of Alaska Kodiak Harbor. 48 SID AK900306-11A COE No. N-780260 The Alaska 'Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G) has reviewed the dock construction project referenced above. The project entails modification of the solid fill bulkhead design by replacing the outer 20 feet of the bulkhead's face with a steel pile supported, concrete capped dock. We have no objection to the project as proposed. Pursuant to 6 AAC 80.010(b), the ADF&G recommends that this project be found consistent with the Standards of the Alaska Coastal Management Program and the Kodiak Island Borough Coastal Management Program. We appreciate the opportunity to comment. If you have any specific questions, please contact me at 267-2333. CC: OM D. T. v. P. L. Kohler, COE Rumfelt, ADEC (PROFS) Gilbert, DNR/DLWM (PROFS) Probasco, ADF&G Freed. KIB (PROFS) ivEr COMMOITY DEVEL DEPT fl C.:•� � o-� -ar. -- eY�e � � M LOCAT DI" ST 4X .T '_ R<;u ' `,. `s c �d SCH!DUL r r Ere te— R T COMMoNTS O,,,: 4 TO ON _ "CL3.10N OE. T: Y'- Nfs .Ya G r'v .• A Orts • ExTENSION GRANTED FOR: ;101p:?&D WAS 2TnPPFr) P':)R mvDwiT.n w.vatly, P.003 to 7 - --) , YAL • , r), (.14 / .i-211fAAKNbt "' ACTION AT CLOSEOUT: TN. “.:VT171 W DISTRJ:CT CD!r,i2MENT 232_ aiL4C-LUS1V1'] CON6ISIENci: fOR ,)TALR RZVIEWS,! is/prinfo nff,tyr.p _•._ T•2L- IFItiTTi : ---„. 4F3 1j LOr B w-p:71-1 rc‘a ; trsri S '31117 !1C) 0-700260 p&-tty Piplawaki zf y 16i C.-1.; • 3601 c strk Suite 370 ,-Ttt:3503--53C:C) Dielaw•Ak :73 '"";""' ( „ : , • , - tin!. C'=:1 • - P. U1714 EB 2 ',31.3j w -y); Li rf f)f - r • p.-1--1-71 1 -4„:',71':L. . te• - - -,••.• 1_ • !:•-•' • 1••••':' c?..r CAS CiS3 to 1C flC • -, -3.-; 14' 1,1-isd.,arcjeti 1KY-F-.B..C2 1 and n Apixox ima ly T. f Icce.1 uplard. q rr3 -1 the bulkad, f are.a fc,r equiprent _ ; ,2:,1 .21, use rj)f due=- 1-1-1 sh t.1,1 ah.yie ic (->n 7 .r.,4 • t re1t r c,t th -- -2- :-■'• • - 7); t , rz;E f/ (./ j•Ln lrL C. Nor cl,t-21.-)) Un t P.„fl: (.7A tireo ("4 • ..1...1•144454,"ae4444,444,441/1" . 4-47, A:11,64 , e • • g ``• .4.= "t• ; Y, - 2 C.` . EL1 4-4.., I I '.-- 11 --7-i • — s" -.4' 4 -' '.-:__-''::_-- • 41" -.k.,s....,....." ,s- s / i' .s .., x • "„'• •74;",, , , s. A `.• , • • ' , . • — -.is.' 4 • "he .1,e4 a, F. 110 •"` • " 4 ' = 41. 41. • -_,A,,,,,,,h,,,,,, ;-,... • 4'. .;...,.1--x1,4,,,__adir-i.------,........,.......aCt.,.--.......-4-2......,-,- -. - -- -. . ". ' -' —' - ''.‘--.." -----...,. ks; ,k .'''...*:-. -74.-k 7.k,,P, i .1 r ; t ,A..., 1",-, ') •• 1, . . „,.„.,,,, ..• ' , .,z. „ , .,..,, T. - ,-.44" - ss.,---"c7-,...._ s'.'.4 '44.'"'"-'" ' '7,,,,,,,4,-41'-'-vra-. ....' s .- A%:- : - ' ,7',.-:444,...::::1,0„.,' /..-.s,-, - • - ' -* .-.- '...""4 t'-1:: i; ''.:..r'• *.' .3-) ( ' —leg*: ' • : 4/ ;.7„,": -,.....-_—.- ;:---,cs-;-...„,..,--- , s ss,,.„,g, ,,,---tks.--, 0 isrrf -. Lsssais44Tin'It „, cis :s rsilv.:::: 11, :,,,,., if 14 '... LI"...e., -'4,,1 4,4 --_,, i '. '5-.-''. --.;-= ''' -"'"gr '---, - ‘. 4tc4",-,14-'-`. v. ',_,„..."4-, '''`. ''',-_: '.' , ".-.-.' - '2'7: : J-':**.A.'rr ".'.',41'..-i'ls..'s"'; L,v,". 4.,-",--..- A ---- i , ......,.,.. - ' ''-- ''..'r-.-,.;:.,rX:1•:::t.:',,,S _ - 47..--t. 1,27,-k „4•Voa.,,,,.....,,„'F',... ;:r.:-. 1 'q4.A.j..... ,„,-, ,,..-' t ',5"-c.-- „ - --7.- . • ...„ " "4-•-•'",",,,.."..4..",..- -- .- i l...,,,,,,,--.44\1:-.-, , ,t,, ,....„. :::::., „.. 1 ,._ .. ,... , i•-!..-4,4 , . - .. - .....:-4-,-..1.. „ 1..o...w,.,..•.!...4-.*.-3.-04.5..`7..17....,,gf-4 ,,..-...-. .- „. ig - CA t7 = .T . . , - _ _ ,.— :V:7 7-3i 3 - 1; . .7-..'1; ' LI ,JI-4Vi•-• -;' C..' ; : s 's -"”. ' -F-,,- ;21 --:::- - ?iv,. .t,....1 .-- .- ,, ' ;;;;;1 • '• --. 4;;;;;, ■a•-• Jr`..-7'-;1_._ • .1 --r i,„„‘„ 1_.:".-.."---- • 1'*-.• = ::-..',:-.:--,-.1,:, 7 --,,,, , .,-; "•--•■■•■ ,..,r, 1 . A .., ,-- :, , ,,_ ,, ,r; . , '.' — ..'-':, , , - ','„ - —:`,•1-.•„; :" .'• „ '•9"--A" ••, • -A • • - „•, 9 it4-7r7' ; EJ4.- • • f1 p.4 ir-4. Ir+2_12 t. ;-0, ,,,;., r`., *-,-;.--1- ,"7,,,,,,,, „:, •- ■ - ,. „ ; . .•;= I ';',,...::)• ',';',.: --,,f---rz.;" , r. ;„ ..-.4.,„. . * 7 5 • 1 APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT AND CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANY - CITY OF KODIAK - KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH - BUILDING DEPARTMENT Telephone: 486 -3224 700 Mill Bay Road APPLICANT TO FILL IN ALL INFORMATION WITHIN BOLD LINES. PLEASE PRINT. USE A BALLPOINT PEN AND PRESS FIRMLY.) (OFFICE USE ONLY) STREET ADDRESS: CLASS ANO SCOPE OF WORK: .- - SPECIFICATIONS: E _ . . ,'';1::._. : - " . ) - -_ '- ,,r 1 - ,tj ( BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER: DATE OF APPLICATION: c r 7 C) I > LOT : BLOCK : ' NEW DEMOLITION FOUNDATION FOOTINGS STEM WALL PIERS ZONING COMPLIANCE : DATE ISSUED: C:: ?( __ ALTERATION \` REPAIR TYPE SUBDIVISION /SURVEY: v; ADDITION MOVE DIMENSIONS VALUATION BAIS: BUILDING PERMIT FEE: /4., ' 4 DEPTH IN GRND O N R NAME: 1 [ + p ',1 r : v ( _ _. -`4 USE OF BUILDING AUTHORIZED BY THIS HERMIT: tede.j t REINFORCEMENT VALUATION: PLAN CHECK FEE: BOLT SPACING MAILING ADDRESS: . l_,'i a ,r' 7 j % CRAWL SPACE HEIGHT INCHES OCCUPANCY GROUP: TOTAL FEE:. A B E G I M R DIV. 1 2 3 5 6 CRAWL SPACE VENT SQ. FEET RECEIPT NO:: CITY & STATE: f `� �'/ � „../.4.1L__ SIZE /_S 7C 4 r i HEIGHT 2.7'7.) / STRUCTURAL SPECIES & GRADE SIZE SPACING SPAN EACH OF THE FOLLOWING STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION REQUIRES INSPECTION BE REQUESTED &COMPLETED PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH ANY FURTHER WORK: FOR INSPECTION CALL 486-3224 NO. OF ROOMS5 STORIES / TEL PJQN, : r <� U - '7, NO. OF FAMILIES 1 -i /,4- GIRDERS TYPE OF BUSINESS L A- f=`0(.. 3..D GIRDERS A R C H / E N G NAME: , ` !&-A 1-_.. L• A ii I,� (ntyr -C...-. NO. OF BLDGS NOW ON LOT 7 JOISTS 1ST FLOOR USE OF EXISTING BLDGS til JOISTS 1ST FLOOR TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - I II III IV (I) 1 -HR FR H.T. -- -, s� ^ �.- /--)() • t;;') '- :7727 T7 SIZE OF LOT 3 ,C t / 7:77- JOISTS 2ND FLOOR WATER: PUBLIC , X PIIIVATE JOISTS 2ND FLOOR CI Y & STATE: f- . //) h SEWER: PUBLIC If. PRIVATE I CEILING JOISTS INSULATION TYPE & THICKNESS: EXTERIOR WALLS EXCAVATION BEARING WALLS TELEPHONE : .^) //;:d-?)6- . 47�s0) e� FOUNDATION , "„j„c UNDERGROUND UTILITIES INTERIOR WALLS DRIVEWAY PERMIT: FOUNDATION / SETBACKS SUBMITTED FRAMING STATE LICENSE : ��4 WALLS ROOF RAFTERS ROOF / CEILING TRUSSES APPROVED ROUGH ELECTRICAL C O N T R A C T D R NAME: 4 ! ,"1 I r42._ SHEATHING TYPE & SIZE: FURNACE TYPE: ROUGH PLUMBING ADEC APPLICATION: FINAL FLOOR SUBMITTED DATE C.O. ISSUED: WOOD HEATER YES NO TYPE MAILING ADDRESS: FINAL APPROVAL WALLS ALASKA FIREMARSHALL REVIEW: SUBMITTED: APPROVED: CITY & STATE: ROOF I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION, THAT IT IS CORRECT AND THAT I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH ALL ORDINANCES AND LAWS REGULATING BUILDING CONSTRUCTION APPLICANT: TELEPHONE : FINISH MATERIAL: ROOF APPROVED- BUILDING OFFICAL: STATE LICENSE EXTERIOR SIDING INTERIOR WALLS NOTES: KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH Community Development 710 Mill Bay Road (Room 204), Kodiak, Alaska 99615 -6340 - Phone: (907) 486 -5736, extension 255 or 254 ZONING COMPLIANCE PERMIT Permit #: , z- R —ex3 1. 2. 3. Property /Applicant: /1..) T Z JAT{� I_ r✓'V�,4L4 ks. Number and size of parking spaces requi red (onsite identification of parking spaces is required - Yes: X No: ) ]Owner d Q ,+ �/�` Mailing Address 7 • Q • BOA 29Q7 I x 4.1►� Phone: T U6. 47 8 U TrVL_ ,� e"-C�_ • 3 D(` �� �� Ski -' Legal Description: C ,7V 7 DL.JhvD$ i r4 — to IS I QhQ� (. c. c-rL� 2otJ..' C U421-1 Off -street loading requireme -` .— .1 " tom.' Street Address: 'W-t- a. NN,,Yirl Tax Code #: f 1 0040 O 00 3 ZD Plat related requirements (e.g., plat notes, easements, subdivision conditions, etc.): Description of Existing Propertyrcurrentzoning: /NZ N- _ Minimum Required Lot Area AV. Width: WA' Other requirements (e.g., zero lot line, additional setbacks, projections into yards, screening, etc.): Actual Lot Area 3 9 6 # T Width: NV* Ma w / ff ,, Minimum Required Setbacks Sides: i N / 4. Front OA- Rear: (.).4 Coastal Management Program Applicable Polices (check appropriate category) - Residential: Business: Maximum Building Height: rJ /jQ' Industrial: Other (list): Use and size of existing structures on the lot: - 5 1-101■36 PCNAJaAZ /7oOS - Is the proposed action consistent with the KIB Coastal Management Program? - Yes: % No: ]SL��7 If the proposed action conflicts with the Coastal Management Program policies, attach a sheet that notes the policy(ies), describes the conflict(s), and specifies conditions to mitigate the conflict(s). Attachment - Yes: No: ic 4. Description of proposed action (attach site plan): �i(iTE'- 4-L C/,W4J a O ,-S77 .)C7VI Foe. 44)Ar ms-4.- Cie- .61& U 'G1 /=O(2 !SA- INc . 5. A nt Certification: I hereby certify that I will comply with the provisions of the Kodiak Island Borough Code and that I have the authority to certify this as the property owner, or as a representative of the property owner. I agree to have ntifiable corner in place in the field for verification of setbacks. By ? L Date: 1.7_:1-44.) -90 Title: ?4,40 r AASO 44.6L'i Supporting documents attached (check): Site plan: As -built survey: Other (list): 6. Community Development staff for zoning, by: _ / Date: l / b Title: /)j4 nn eit- 7. Fire Chief [City of Kodiak, Fire District #1 (Bayside), Womens Bay Fire District] approval for UFC by: Date: 8. Driveway Permit (State, City of Kodiak, Borough) issued by: Date: 9. Septic system PLAN approved by: Date: Distribution: File /Building Official /Applicant THIS FORM DOES NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION WHEN A BUILDING PERMIT IS REQUIRED December 1989 -44-4.-t." / •3 kJ:is. / / );,• . ii . i / o APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT AND CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANY - CITY OF KODIAK - KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH - BUILDING DEPARTMENT Telephone: 486 -3224 700 Mill Bay Road FILL IN ALL INFORMATION WITHIN BOLD LINES. PLEASE PRINT. USE A BALLPOINT PEN AND PRESS FIRMLY.) (OFFICE USE ONLY) STREET ADDRESS: CLASS AND SCOPE OF WORK: SPECIFICATIONS: BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER: DATE OF APPLICATION: LOT : BLOCK : NEW DEMOLITION FOUNDATION FOOTINGS STEM WALL PIERS ZONING COMPLIANCE : DATE ISSUED: ALTERATION REPAIR TYPE SUBDIVISION /SURVEY: ADDITION MOVE DIMENSIONS VALUATION BASIS: BUILDING PERMIT FEE: DEPTH IN GRND k N E R NAME: USE OF BUILDING AUTHORIZED BY THIS PERMIT: REINFORCEMENT VALUATION: PLAN CHECK FEE: BOLT SPACING CRAWL SPACE HEIGHT INCHES OCCUPANCY GROUP: TOTAL FEE: MAILING ADDRESS: A B E H I M R DIV. 1 2 3 4 5 6 CRAWL SPACE. VENT SQ. FEET RECEIPT NO.: CITY & STATE: SIZE HEIGHT STRUCTURAL SPECIES & GRADE SIZE SPACING SPAN EACH OF THE FOLLOWING STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION REQUIRES INSPECTION BE REQUESTED & COMPLETED PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH ANY FURTHER WORK: FOR INSPECTION CALL 486 -3224 NO. OF ROOMS STORIES TELEPHONE NO. OF FAMILIES GIRDERS TYPE OF BUSINESS GIRDERS A R C H / E N G NAME: NO. OF BLDGS NOW ON LOT JOISTS 1ST FLOOR USE OF EXISTING BLDGS JOISTS 1ST FLOOR TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION MAILING ADDRESS: SIZE OF LOT JOISTS 2ND FLOOR I 11 III IV V N 1 -HR FR H.T. WATER: PUBLIC , PRIVATE JOISTS 2ND FLOOR CITY & STATE: SEWER: PUBLIC PRIVATE CEILING JOISTS EXCAVATION INSULATION TYPE & THICKNESS: EXTERIOR WALLS BEARING WALLS TELEPHONE : FOUNDATION UNDERGROUND UTILITIES INTERIOR WALLS DRIVEWAY PERMIT: FOUNDATION / SETBACKS SUBMITTED FRAMING STATE LICENSE : WALLS ROOF RAFTERS ROOF / CEILING TRUSSES APPROVED ROUGH ELECTRICAL 0 N T R A C T 0 R NAME: SHEATHING TYPE & SIZE: FURNACE TYPE: _ ROUGH PLUMBING ADEC APPLICATION: FINAL FLOOR SUBMITTED _ DATE C.O. ISSUED: WOOD HEATER YES NO TYPE MAILING ADDRESS: FINAL APPROVAL WALLS ALASKA FIREMARSHALL REVIEW: SUBMITTED: APPROVED: CITY & STATE: ROOF I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION, THAT IT IS CORRECT AND THAT I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH ALL ORDINANCES AND LAWS REGULATING BUILDING CONSTRUCTION APPLICANT: TELEPHONE : FINISH MATERIAL: ROOF APPROVED— BUILDING OFFICAL: STATE LICENSE EXTERIOR SIDING INTERIOR WALLS NOTES: KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH Community Development 710 Mill Bay Road (Room 204), Kodiak, Alaska 99615-6340 - Phone: (907) 486 -5736, extension 255 ZONING COMPLIANCE PERMIT Permit #: 1. Property Owner/Applicant I(UTEQN (SITU oJAL. SE Pooc S Mailing Address: A O R o x 2. Legal Description: 7T FL4Nn n� 2►-CT Street Address: _] �C — 71 Z Ter C r,✓ y 1 e-4) Tax Code #: (Z `1 D OC.)0C ?, S 0 3. Description of Existing PropeJrty/Currentzoning: 't us4 Minimum Required Lot Area ad/ YO C7 Width: 7 S Actual Lot Area: 14 2-1 °� 3-2_ ,lJ / Width: 4Gifir. Minimum Required Setbacks: Sides: T Front: ullding Height: Use and size of existing strictures on the lot: r -kV1Ou 9- .D k)..1 k ''t X 1 %4- 4. Description of proposed action (attach site plan): &kl4ar `ton2. JcQe_. /M. a. Is road access available for emergency vehicles? Yes: % -� No: b Is the water supply adequate for any structure other than a single - family residence or duplex? Yes: \./e S No: c. (Contact and note confirmation from the appropriate fire chief or note personal knowledge.) ?if( Number and size of parking spaces required (onsite identification of perking spaces is required - Yes: - j 5 No: —s 'C,'% / Off- 4tree� ding requirement: Plat related requirements (e.g., plat notes, easements, subdivision conditions, etc.): Other requirements (e.g., zero lot line, additional setbacks, projections int yards, screening, et): ' -.<-Q - Residential: Business: (S in. cei t.e. 'b LA.1 L L N.r_ ;moo.v krQ )uk I. U Coastal Irfanagement rogP ram Applicable Pollees (check CA44pri Industrial: Other (list): Is the proposed action consistent with the KIB Coastal Management Program? - Yes: No: If the proposed action conflicts with the Coastal Management Program polices, attach a sheet that notes the policy(tes), describes the conflict(s), and specifies conditions to mitigate the conflict(s). Attachment(s) - Yes: No: 5. Applicant Certification: I hereby certify that I will comply with the provisions of the Kodiak Island Borough Code and that I have the authority to certify this as the property owner, or as a representative of the property owner. I agree to have Identifiable corner markers in place in the field for verification of setbacV By: Supporting documents attached ( check); e can: 6. Staff approval: Distribution: File As -built survey: Date: 9 /ac,/ 39 Other (list): Title: P r .Q S Dv, Date: Building Official THIS FORM DOES NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION WHEN A BUILDING PERMIT IS REQUIRED kpc-J0 ()own t 1 - .• wad, t SME EMU OFFICE OF TUE GOVERNOR DIVISION OF GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION SOUTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE 431 NORTH FRANKLIN P.O. BOX AW, SUITE 101 JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811-0165 PHONE: (907) 465-3562 REGISTERED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED SOUTHCENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE 2600 DENALI STREET SUITE 700 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503-2798 PHONE: (907) 274-1581 Mr. David L. Rogers International-Seafoods -of-Ala-§ka P.O. Box 2997 Kodiak, AK 99615 Dear Mr. Rogers: December -1 STEVE COWPER, GOVERNOR SUBJECT: KODIfiKI1HARBOR-7:48 MODIFICATION STATE I. D. NO. AK880912-10A CONCLUSIVE CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION The Division of Governmental Coordination (DGC) has completed coordinating the state's review of your project for consistency with the Alaska Coastal Management Program (ACMP). On December 1, 1988 you were issued a proposed consistency finding for your project. The project is to modify, the existing Kodiak Harbor 48 permit (2-780260) by dredging 2,500 cubic yards of bottom material and placing approximately 50,000 cubic yards of fill behind a steel bulkhead. The existing wooden dock and bulkhead will be removed using a shore mounted crane. A new closed cell steel bulkhead will be constructed, the bottom material dredged and then 50,000 cubic yards of fill placed as backfill to the bulkhead. The project is located on Near Island Channel (section 32, T. 27 S., R. 19 W., S.M.) and will provide additional vessel dockage and land area for expanded seafoods processing capability. This conclusive consistency determination applies to the following state and federal authorizations as per 6 AAC 50: 1. Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) - Certificate of Reasonable Assurance - Amendment. CENTRAL OFFICE P.O. BOX AW JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811-0165 PHONE: (907) 465-3562 NORTHERN REGIONAL OFFICE 675 SEVENTH AVENUE STATION H FAIRBANKS, ALASKA 99701-4596 PHONE: (907) 456-3084 13, 1988 RECEIVED DEC 1 6 19 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT 2. U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) - Section 10 and Section 404 Permit - Modification (2-780260). 01-A35LH Mr. David L. Rogers Kodiak Harbor 48 Modification State I. D. No. AK880912-10A 2 December 13, 1988 Based on the review of your project by the Alaska Departments of Natural Resources, Environmental Conservation and Fish and Game and the Kodiak Island Borough, the state concurs with your certification that the project is consistent with the ACMP provided the following conditions are met. These stipulations will appear as conditions on the Certificate of Reasonable Assurance issued by DEC: 1. The proposed steel bulkhead shall be in place prior to dredging or backfill placement. 2. The fill shall not contain trash, refuse, organic matter or any substance which is defined as solid waste under State Regulation 18 ACC 60 (Solid Waste Management Regulation). 3. The portions of the wooden bulkhead treated with creosote that are to be removed, shall be disposed of at a DEC approved disposal site. They are not to be burned. These stipulations are necessary to prevent pollution of the air and waters of the Near Island Channel area as per 6 AAC 80.140 the Air, Land and Water Quality Standard of the ACMP. A copy of this ACMP standard is enclosed. Please be advised that although not necessary to ensure consistency under the ACMP, the Kodiak Island Borough Community Development Department states that should you intend to construct any structures on the filled area, local permits (zoning compliance and building permits) must be obtained prior to the start of construction. Also please be advised that the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service have requested that the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers stipulate in their Section 404 Permit for your project that "no fill materials shall be placed seaward of the existing mean low-lower water line." I recommend that you contact the COE to discuss this particular stipulation. This conclusive consistency determination represents a consensus reached between you as the project applicant and the reviewing agencies listed above, as provided for under 6 AAC 50.070(k), regarding the conditions necessary to insure the consistency of the proposed project with the ACMP. As also provided under 15 CFR 930.64(c), federal authorization of your project will be made with the full understanding that your original project proposal has been modified subject to the conditions described above. co4/34 Mr. David L. Rogers 3 December 13, 1988 Kodiak Harbor 48 Modification State I. D. No. AK880912-10A If changes to the approved project are proposed prior to or during its siting, construction, or operation, you are required to contact this office immediately to determine if further review and approval of the revised project is necessary. The state reserves the right to enforce compliance with this conclusive consistency determination if the project is changed in any significant way, or if the actual use differs from the approved use contained in the project description. If appropri- ate, the state may amend the state approval listed in this conclusive consistency determination. By a copy of this letter, we are informing the_U. S. Army Corps of Engineers of our proposed finding. If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 274-1581. Sincerely, 3- "Smith Project Review Coordinator . Enclosures cc: Tim Rumfelt Department of Environmental Conservation Wayne Dolezal Department of Fish and Game Greg Curney Department of Natural Resources Linda Freed Kodiak Island Borough John Leeds U. S. Army Corps of Engineers 1; 01-A35LH SITE bligAEM OFFICE OF TUE GOVERNOR DIVISION OF GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION SOUTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE 431 NORTH FRANKLIN P.O. BOX AW, SUITE 101 JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811-0165 PHONE: (907) 465-3562 SOUTHCENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE 2600 DENALI STREET SUITE 700 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503-2798 PHONE: (907) 274-1581 November 30, Mr. David L. Rogers International Seafoods of Alaska P.O. Box 2997 Kodiak, AK 99615 Dear Mr. Rogers: ( STEVE COWPER, GOVERNOR CENTRAL OFFICE P.O. BOX AW JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811-0165 PHONE: (907) 465-3562 NORTHERN REGIONAL OFFICE 675 SEVENTH AVENUE STATION H FAIRBANKS, ALASKA 99701-4596 PHONE: (907) 456-3084 1988 SUBJECT: KODIAK HARBOR 48 MODIFICATION STATE I.D. NO. AK880912-10A RESTART OF PROJECT REVIEW The Division of-Governmental Coordination (DGC) is currently coordinating the review of the above project. The review is presently in extended status as per our extension letter of October 17, 1988. Your associate, Martin Byrne, requested the extension on the project because you were out of the country. In our conversation today, you requested the state's review to restart. The revised schedule is as follows: Comments due to DGC: Notice to Applicant: Decision Deadline: November 30, 1988 December 9, 1988 December 15, 1988 Please contact me if you have any questions. Thank you for your cooperation With the Alaska Coastal Management Program. Sinc rely, 'Aliso Projec cc: John Leeds U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Distribution List it mith Review Coordinator RECEIVED OEC 6 - 19 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT DISTRIBUTION LIST October 17, 1988 [613] Ms. Judith Bittner, Department of Natural Resources Division of Parks, Anchorage [1350] NT. Tam Brooks, Manager, Civil Engineering Alaska Railroad Corporation, Anchorage (3] Mr. Bob Flint, Department of Environmental Conservation, Anchorage [867] Na. Linda Freed, Kodiak [1220) Me. Veronica Gilbert, Department of Natural Resources, Anchorage [268) Mr. Use L. Gross, Kodiak (1394) Ns. Sara Hunt, Division of Governmental Coordination, Junsau [1072) Mr. Neil Johansen, Department of Natural Resources Division of Parks, Anchorage [303) Mr. Michael O'Brien, Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, Anchorage [287) Mr. Gordon Pullar, Kodiak Area Native Association, Kodiak (859] The Honorable Jerome M. Selby, Kodiak [371] Mr. Lance Traaky, Department of Fish and Game, Anchorage 01-A35LH OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR DIVISION OF GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION SOUTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE 431 NORTH FRANKLIN P.O. BOX AW, SUITE 101 JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811-0165 PHONE: (907) 465-3562 REGISTERED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED SOUTHCENTRAL REGIONAL. OFFICE 26(X) DENALI STREET SUITE 700 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503-2798 PHONE: (907) 274-1581 Mr. David L. Rogers International Seafoods of Alaska P.O. Box 2997 Kodiak, AK 99615 Dear Mr. Rogers: December SUBJECT: KODIAK HARBOR 48 MODIFICATION STATE I. D. NO. AK880912-10A PROPOSED CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION The Division of Governmental Coordination is currently coordinat- ing the review of your project for consistency with the Alaska Coastal Management Program (ACMP) and has developed this proposed consistency finding based on reviewers' comments. The project is to modify the existing Kodiak Harbor 48 permit (2-780260) by dredging 2,500 cubic yards of bottom material and placing approx- imately 50,000 cubic yards of fill behind a steel bulkhead. The existing wooden dock and bulkhead will be removed using a shore mounted crane. A new closed cell steel bulkhead will be constructed, the bottom material dredged and then 50,000 cubic yards of fill placed as backfill to the bulkhead. The project is located on Near Island Channel (section 32, T. 27 S., R. 19 W., S.M.) and will provide additional vessel dockage and land area for expanded seafoods processing capability. This proposed consistency determination . applies to the following state and federal authorizations as per 6 AAC 50: STEVE COWPER, GOVERNOR CENTRAL OFFICE P.O. BOX AW JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811-0165 PHONE: (907) 465-3562 NORTHERN REGIONAL OFFICE 675 SEVENTH AVENUE STATION H FAIRBANKS, ALASKA 99701-4596 PHONE: (907) 456-3084 1, 1988 F5)1, r7.771 7 7 r — I • • e COVIHUNI 1. Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) - Certificate of Reasonable Assurance - Amendment. 2. U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) - Section 10 and Section 404 Permit - Modification (2-780260). Based on the review of your project by the Alaska Departments of Natural Resources, Environmental Conservation and Fish and Game and the Kodiak Island Borough, the state concurs with your Mr. David L. Rogers 2 December 1, 1988 Kodiak Harbor 48 Modification State I. D. No 880912-10A certification that the project is consistent with the ACMP provided the following conditions are met. These stipulations will appear as conditions on the Certificate of Reasonable Assurance issued by DEC: 1. The proposed steel bulkhead shall be in place prior to dredging or backfill placement. 2. The fill shall not contain trash, refuse, organic matter or any substance which is defined as solid waste under State Regulation 18 ACC 60 (Solid Waste Management Regulation). 3. The portions of the wooden bulkhead treated with creosote that are to be removed, shall be disposed of at a DEC approved disposal site. They are not to be burned. These stipulations are necessary to prevent pollution of the air and waters of the Near Island Channel area as per 6 AAC 80.140 the Air, Land and Water Quality Standard of the ACMP. A copy of this ACMP standard is enclosed. Please contact, me within five days of your receipt of this proposed finding to indicate whether or not you concur with this finding. If you are not prepared to concur within the five day period, you may either: (a) request an extension of the review schedule, if you need more time to consider this finding, or (b) request that the state reconsider this finding, by submitting a written statement requesting "elevation" of the finding, describing your concerns, and proposing an alternative consistency finding. This alternative finding must demonstrate how your project is consistent with the referenced standards of the ACMP without the stipulations included in this pvoposed finding. If I don't receive your request for extension or elevation statement within five days of your receipt of this letter, this proposed finding will be issued as a final conclusive consistency determination. If you concur with the proposed consistency finding, it will be issued as a final conclusive consistency determination. Please be advised that although not necessary to ensure consistency under the ACMP, the Kodiak Island Borough Community Development Department states that should you intend to construct co4/13 9 4. 1 - Mr.,David L. Rogers Kodiak Harbor 48 Modification State I. D. No. 880912-10A December 1, 1988 any structures on the filled area, local permits (zoning compliance and building permits) must be obtained prior to the start of construction. Also please be advised that the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service have requested that the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers stipulate in their Section 404 Permit for your project that "no fill materials shall be placed seaward of the existing mean low-lower water line." I recommend that you contact the COE to discuss this particular stipulation. By a copy of this letter, we are informing the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers of our proposed finding. If you have any questions regarding this process, please contact me at 274-1581. Sincerely, Enclosures A son . Smith Project Review Coordinator cc: Tim Rumfelt Department of Environmental Conservation Wayne Dolezal Department of Fish and Game Greg Curney Department of Natural Resources Linda Freed Kodiak Island Borough John Leeds U. S. Army Corps of Engineers co4/13 OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR • DIVISION OF GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION SOUTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE 431 NORTH FRANKLIN P.O. BOX AW, SUITE 101 JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811-0165 PHONE: (907) 465-3562 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED SOUTHCENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE 2600 DENALI STREET SUITE 700 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503-2798 PHONE: (907) 274-1581 Mr. David Rogers _ International Seafoods of Alaska P.O. Box 2997 Kodiak, AK 99615 October 17, 1988 Dear Mr. Rogers: SUBJECT: KODIAK HARBOR 48 MODIFICATION STATE I. D. #AK880912-10A REVIEW EXTENSION STEVE COWPER, GOVERNOR CENTRAL OFFICE P.O. BOX AW JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811-0165 PHONE: (907) 465-3562 NORTHERN REGIONAL OFFICE 675 SEVENTH AVENUE STATION I-I FAIRBANKS, ALASKA 99701-4596 PHONE: (907) 456-3084 Ec OCT 2 1988 COMMUNITY DEVELOP DEPT The Division of Governmental Coordination is coordinating the state's review of the above-listed project. Currently the review is almost complete, as today is day 34, the end of the comment period. In a conversation with Mr. Martin Byrne of your office today, it was agreed that the, review timeframe should be extend- ed. This will allow you time to go over the concerns of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service related to your project. I am therefore extending the review of Kodiak Harbor 48 Modification for two months from the date your office receives this notification. Enclosed you will find copies of the comments of the above agencies. Please contact me if you have any questions and to reestablish the review schedule. Enclosures Sinc ely, son Project Review Coordinator cc: John Leeds U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Distribution 01-A35LH DISTRIBUTION LIST October 17, 1988 [613] Ms. Judith Bittner, Department of Natural Resources Division of Parks, Anchorage [1350] Mr. Tom Brooks, Manager, Civil Engineering Alaska Railroad Corporation, Anchorage [3] Mr. Bob Flint, Department of Environmental Conservation, Anchorage [867] Ms. Linda Freed, Kodiak [1220] Ms. Veronica Gilbert, Department of Natural Resources, Anchorage [268] Mr. Uwe L. Gross, Kodiak [1394] Ms. Sara Hunt, Division of Governmental Coordination, Juneau [1072] Mr. Neil Johannsen, Department of Natural Resources Division of Parks, Anchorage [303] Mr. Michael O'Brien, Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, Anchorage [287] Mr. Gordon Pullar, Kodiak Area Native Association, Kodiak [859] The Honorable Jerome M. Selby, Kodiak [371] Mr. Lance Trasky, Department of Fish and Game, Anchorage October 10, 1988 Ms. Linda Freed Community Development Director Kodiak Island Borough 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, AK 99615 RE: Harbor Projec Dear Linda: #AK 87041724 This letter is in response to your request concerning my comments on harbor project, reference #AK 87041724 A. I have reviewed the proposed dock plan and would like to make the following comments on the location of this project. As previously stated in other work and projects in the Near Island Channel, this is a busy waterway with vessel traffic of all sizes and types transiting it year round. Regardless of the posted speed limit of 5 miles per hour in the channel the proposed dock facility would be exposed to heavy wake and swell conditions. Large vessels such as the state ferry TUSTAMENA displaces 3,100 long tons of sea water at idle speed in the channel area.: A good fendering system and tie—up procedures should be implemented to this dock facility to protect moored vessels as well as persons using the float system. If you have any further questions please feel free to contact me at any time. Sincerely, PORT OF KODIAK G. V. McCorkle Harbormaster/Port Administrator .11E-CV OCT a 7 1988 DEVELOPMENT DEPT. PORT 0 ICODNIC, P.O. BOA 1397, KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 PHONE (907) 486-5438 MEMORAUM Stair& of Alaska : Alison L. Smith Project Coordinator Division of Governmental Coordination Office of Management and Budget FROM: 02-001 A (Rev 11-85) C. a ne Doleza Habitat Biologist Region II Habitat Division Department of Fish and Game DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME DATE: October 12, 1988 Fl LE NO.: TELEPHONE NO.: SUBJECT: 267-2284 International Seafoods of Alaska Kodiak Harbor 48 SID AK880912-10A COE N-780260 The Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G) has reviewed the sheetpile bulkhead construction project referenced above. The project entails the removal of existing wooden dock and bulkhead components and installation of steel sheetpile to form 'a pair of closed-cell bulkheads. Approximately 52,500 cubic yards of material will be placed shoreward of the sheetpile. In addition, the face of the existing dock will be dredged to the minus 14 feet (below mean low low water) level. We have no objection to the project as proposed. Pursuant to 6 AC 80.010(b), the ADF&G recommends that this project be found consistent with the Standards of the Alaska Coastal Management Program and the Industrial Development Policies of the Kodiak Island Borough Coastal Management Program. By copy of this memorandum we are providing the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers with these initial comments and recommendations on the project pursuant to the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act -(16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.). The department's position regarding •the project will be that adopted in the state's coastal management consistency determination. We appreciate the opportunity to comment If you have any specific questions, please contact me at 267-2333. cc: L. D. T. V. B. R. P. D. OMB Freed, KIB Kohler, COE Rumfelt, ADEC (PROFS) Gilbert, ADNR (PROFS) Smith, NMFS Sumner, EPA Probasco, ADF&G Rogers, International Seafoods of Alaska (PROFS) k 3 EIVED OCT 1 7 19E8 orvfommuiviry .toping,NT PEPT: Kodiak Island Borough P.O. BOX 1246 KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-1246 PHONE (907) 486.5736 Alison L. Smith, Project Coordinator DGC Southcentral Regional Office State of Alaska 2600 Denali Street, Suite 700 Anchorage, Alaska 99503-2798 October 10, 1988 Re: Kodiak Harbor 48 (City Tidelands Tracts P-15 and N-16A) State Identification Number AK 880912-10A Dear Ms. Smith: The Kodiak Island Borough has reviewed the proposed modification to an existing Department of the Army permit, file number 2-780260, referenced above. The applicant proposes to modify the permit by dredging approximately two thousand five hundred (2,500) cubic yards of material and by placing approximately fifty thousand (50,000) cubic yards of material along with a steel bulkhead in the waters of the United States. Based on our review and consultation with the City of Kodiak, we believe that this project is consistent with the Kodiak Island Borough Coastal Management Program and the Alaska Coastal Management Program. We do provide this advisory note: should the applicant intend to construct any structures on the filled area, local permits (zoning compliance and building permits) must be obtained prior to the start of construction. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. Sincerely, Linda L. Freed, Director Community Development Department cc: W. Dolezal, ADF&G V. Gilbert, DNR J. Leeds, COE T. Rumfelt, DEC D1VISIgtif OF GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION STEVE' COW 1E GO sOUTHCEHTRAI. REGIONAL OFFICE- 2600 DENAU STREET SUITE 700 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 995032798 PHONE: (907) 274 -159? PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET PRO STATE I'. ,D. NU DGC CONTACT:* APPLICANT' CONDUCTING_ ACTIVITY: tT 64/1 3Y J DIRECT FEDERAL ,ACTION YES'" NO REVIEW TYPE: CONSISTENCY L% ANILCA. OCSLA ACTIVITY TYPE: ARMED FORCES ACTIVITIES - I/COMMERCIAL /TYPE Sec( M • -*LAND MGMT'. PLAN MINING:- HARDROCK MINING> PLACER- MINING • OFFSHORE - MINING OIL AND GAS • OTHER-- - PUBLIC.UTILITIES /FACILITIES PRIVATE.RESIDENTIAL TIMBER FISHERIES:" PRODUCTIO GENERAL- HATCHERY REMOTE RELEASE, - FISHERIES' FARMS:4 FINFISH SHELLFISH, SEA VEGETABLES FISHERIES ENHANCEMENT FISHERIES PROCESSING PROJECT LOCATION: NEAREST COASTAL. DISTRICT: PROJECT INSIDE'. THE DISTRICT BOUNDARY: YES. L/ NO DISTRICT PLAN - 'APPROVED YES V NO PENDING REVIEW MILESTONES DAY 1 tan /_c��• ��l /7F REVIEW SCHEDULE: 15 -Day 30 -Day 50 -Day OTHER REVIEWER° REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL. INFORMATION BY: l9 • w l I f9 . I �A COMMENTS ,DUE :TO DGC BY: NOTIFICATION TO APPLICANT BY: DECISION DEADLINE:, Af. /7, / 9T-8- PROJECT PREVIOUSLY:' REVIEWED UNDER- STATEr ID NO. -STATE`APPROVALS (LIST AGENCY/APPROVAL TYPE /I.D.. NUMBER) FEDERAL EXTENS ION GRANTED FOR FORMAL- INFORMATION REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING:: HELD PROJECT;;4N U.O..B..: FIELD REVIEW; DNR DISPOSAL : SMCRA MISCELLANEOUS APPLICANT REQUEST UNUSUALLY COMPLEX PROJECT LEwaioN ,-7,6> DIRECTORS : YES NO IF YES , BY': ELEVATION TO COMM ISSIONERS YES NO IF YES, BY. CLOCK STOPPED: ON WAS STOPPED. FOR DAYS',, ACTION AT CLOSEOUT: CLOSE -OUT DATE DISTRICT'" COMMENTS; RECEIVED: - Y CLOCK RESTARTED ON ACTUAL NUMBER OF DAYS IN REVIEW S • NO FOR CONCLUSIVE CONSISTENCY DETERMINATIONS: CONSISTENT WITH STIPULATIONS CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT FOR OTHER REVIEWS: .. COMMENTS SUBMITTED pis /prinfo OTHER WITHDRAWN DISTRIBUTION LIST. September 12, 1988 [613]. .Ma. Judith Bittner, Department of Natural Resources Division of Parks, - Anchorage [1350] Mr: Tom Brooks,- Manager,. Civil Engineering - Alaska Railroad Corporation, Anchorage [3].. . Mr. Bob Flint, Department'of Environmental Conservation, Anchorage [867] .Ms. Linda Freed, Kodiak [1220] Ms. Veronica Gilbert, Department of'Natural Resources,'Anchorage.- [268] Mr. Uwe L. Gross, Kodiak [1394] Ms. Sara -Hunt, Division of Governmental Coordination, Juneau [1072] Mr. Neil Johansen, Department of.Natural Resources Division•of'Parks,`Anchorage.. [303] Mr. Michael O'Brien, Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, Anchorage [ 2871. Mr. Gordon Pullar, Kodiak -Area Native Association, Kodiak [859] ,The. Honorable Jerome` M. Selby, Kodiak' [371] Mr. Lance Trasky, Department of Fish and Game, Anchorage • US Army Corps:. of.Engineers_ Alaska District:.. Regulatory Branch.' Post. Office Box 898 . Anchorage, ,Alaska 99506- 0898 ublic Notice f Application for Permit OFFICE OF EMMY & BUDGET EXPIRATION DATE: 7 October 1988 1988 REFERENCE NUMBER: N- 780260 WATERWAY NUMBER Kodiak Harbor 48 PUBLIC- NOTICE DATE:. 8 September.1988 VERN a s :'. 0 . � � TI 1 "- 'ate est p e.s.are Hereby notified that. an application has been.received for 'a Department of the. Army permit f_ or certain. work-in waters of the United. • States, as described`below and shown,on the-attacned plan. APPLICANT: International Seafoods of Alaska', Post Office Box 2997,,Kodiak, Alaska 49615. . LOCATION: Section 32, T. 27 S.,.R. i9.W., Seward Meridian; Near Island Channel, City of Kodiak, Kodiak Island, Alaska*. WORK:: The - applicant proposes modify an existing Department of tne.Army - permi,t,'file number.2- 780260, Kodiak Harbor 48, by placing approximately - 50,000 cuoic yaras (cy), dredge 2,500-cy,.and a steel aulknead -in waters-of the united States: :Tne existing :wooden dock ana.bulneao components inaicatea on'sneet 3/4, cross- section ''B -B" would be removed via.a shore'mounted'crane; B.. A steel-oulxneaa.With closed-cell configuration, with a facing matching that of the existing ISA dock, woula.be constructed on the northeastern and soutnwestern,enas of the existing dock via a barge mounted pile- driver (crane); C. Approximately 2,500 cy of bottom.material would be dredged, via a oarge, mounted backhoe (type) equipment, tolower the existing dock face draft to a minimum of 14' be-lowvmean-lowlow water (MLLW): This material would be discharged. as backfi-ll,to the proposed bulkhead; and O. _:Approximately 50,000 cy of graywacke, ootainea.from local upland quarries, would.be dumped as backfill• to the bulkhead.' PURPOSE: The.appl.icant proposes to proviae additional- -vessel aockage•ana, land:area for expanded_ equipment loft. The expanded -cock would allow for productive use'.of the soutnwest po.rtion,of the existing dock which is . currently , unusaole- due.to a snoal area. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:: Contact the authorized.agent Mr. David L Rogers at the above address, or =call (907) 486- 4768.: . WATER QUALITY- CER.TTFICATION:: A permit for the describea work_will not:oe issued until- a certification or. waiver.of- certification as requireaunder Section 401 of the.Clean Water Act (Public Law 95 -217), has been received from the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation:. COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT ACT CERTIFICATION: Section:307(c)(3) of the Coastal -Zone Management Act of . 1972, ,as amended by 16 U.S.C.-1456(c)(3),- requires ''the applicant to certify that the described . activity -affecting.,land or water- uses in-the Coastal.Zone complies with: the.Alaska Coastal -Management Program. A permit will . not be issued 'until the Office-of-Management and Budget, Division. of Governmental Coor-dination has .concurred - with- the -applicant's certification: PUBLIC HEARING Any. person may request, in writing,.wi'thin the comment pe.riod.specified in this notice,- that a. public hearing be neld to consider_ • - this- application :Requests for public hearings shall state,- with. . ,.particularity, the reasons for holding a .public hearing. 'CULTURAL-RESOURCES The latest published version of the National Register of.Historic Places has been consulted .for the presence or absence of - registerea-. properties, .or. properties. listed as` being eligible for inclusion therein, and this worksite is not registered property or property listed as ::being eligible fo -rinclusion in the Register: of the National Register constitutes the extent of cultural resource investigations by the District Engineer,. and he is Otherwise-unaware-Of the presence of such resources. P resently,;unknown archeological, scientific, prehistorical, or, historical data,may be lost or destroyed:by work under the requested - permit. ENDANGERED SPECIES: -Noy threatened orendangered species are known. to use the. project area. - Preliminarily, the described activity will not affect 'endangered species, or their critical habitat designated as :endangered or threatened, under the Endangered Species Act. of 1973 (87 Stat. '344) . This- application is being coordinated with the U.S.; Fish and Wildlife Service and .the National Marine Fisheries Service.. Any comments they may.have concerning endangered or threatened wildlife or plants or their critical. habitat will be considered in our final assessment. of the described work. FEDERAL SPECIES OF CONCERN: The following Federal species of. concern may use the project area: Steelhead.Trout, Sockeye. Salmon, Chinook- Salmon, Cono . Salmon,'Sea Otter, Black Brant, Canada .Goose, Aleutian Canada Goose, Bald Eagle, -Emperor Goose and-Tundra Swan.. FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT:. Evaluation' of. the described activity will include conformance with appropriate State or local flood plain - standards; consideration of alternative sites and- methoas-of accomplishment; and weighing of the positive, concentrated, and dispersed, and short and long -term ,impacts_ on the flood plain: ' . SPECIAL. AREA DESIGNATION.: None. EVALUATION: The decision whether.to issue a permit will oe based on an. :. evaluation of the probable- impacts including cumulative impacts,of the proposed: activity,- and its -intended. use on'the,publicinterest. Evaluation of ,the probable impacts which the proposed activity may have on the public interest r-equires_a careful weighing aof all those factors which become relevant.'in each particular case. The benefits which reasonably maybe. expected -to accrue-from the proposal must-be balanced against its.reasonably foreseeable detriments.: The decision whether to authorize a proposal, and - if so the conditions under which it. will be allowed to..occur,-are therefore. - determined by the outcome of the .general balancing process. That decision- should reflect the ,national . concern for both'.protection and utilization of important resources.. All factors which -may be; relevant-to the proposal must--, must- :be . considered including'the cumulative effects thereof. Among those are conservation, economics, :aesthetics,'general environmental concerns, ,wetlands, cultural values, fish and. wildlife values, flood- hazards, - floodplain values, land use, navigation, shore erosion and accretion, 'recreation,: water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs,:; safety, food and ; fiberproduction, - mineral needs; considerations, of .property •ownership,_ and, in general, the needs and - welfare of the people For activities involving 404 discharges, a permit will be denied if the . ,discharge that would be' authorized by such permit would not-comply_ with ,Environmental Protection Agency'•s 404(b)(1)• guidelines. Subject to the . .preceding sentence And any other applicable guidelines. or criteria (see. ' Sections 320.2 -and 320.3), 'a permit will :be granted unless the District Engineer determines that it would be contrary to the public interesf.. AUTHORITY This permit will be' issued or denied under the following authorities Perform work in or _ affecting navigable waters of the--United States -- Section 10 Rivers and Harbors Act 1899 (33 U.S.. C. 403). Discharge... dredged or _fill' material into waters"of the United States -- Section 404 Clean Water. Act (33 U: S; C: 1844): Therefore, our public interest review -wi l l _consider the guidelines set forth under Section 4040b) of the ,Clean. Water . • Act-(40 CFR 230) . Comments on.the,described.work, with- the.re:ference-numoer, should reach.this office no later than the expiration date of this Public Notice to :become part of:the.- record and be considered in the decision. If further information`is desired concerning this notice, contact Jonn, C. Leeds, III., at-(907):751-27,12.,- A plan, Notice of Application. for Certification of Consistency witn -tne. Alaska Coastal Management Program, and Notice of Application for,State Water • Quality'.Certification are attached. to this Public Notice. District Enginee U.S; Army, - Corps. of ,Engineers vicusi rry P SCAL V IN YARD5 �o DCc SPAce FisHir6/CA126c opEFAcrec, PLAN viv\i ArD'z'ALT-CWNE2S'. EAG LC SEA PCc1 E61- PCI Sac■r-cet. 1N-77:RN Ain.ONAL 45EAFecip5 cr,P AL_AsiA P.O: 9 AK AK' 99Gif., v4. CA:M: =1:1=i 88 Ex ST 7Dcicic ; .;■4;mEE4Z c71- CYO PROPOSED DO C EXPAN totsi CN NEAR SL.,^41•11) (.1-144,4N CT'( OFOD1AZ -Tit:ELAND -17-06G-T5 15, l6,4 AppLICATte.4.1 B"c: alv-rEgNA110.3AL_ C.F ALAS • 7!).: • r ,,. r � (.71, 1 OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR OFFICE' OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET DIVISION OF GOVERNMENTAL COQRDINAT.IQN STATE OF ALASKA STEVE COWPER, GOVERNOR • CENTRAL OFFICE P.O., BOX AW JUNEAU. ALASKA ,99811 -0155 PriONE: (907).'65.3562 DIVISION OF GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION Notice of Application. for Certification of Consistency with the Alaska Coastal Management Program Notice is hereby given that a request is being filed with_the Division of Governmental Coordination for concurrence, as provid- ed in Section 307 (c) (3r of the Coastal Zone Management. Act of 1972, as amended [P.L..94 -370; 90 Stat. 1013; 16 U.S.0 1456 (c)(3)) that the project described in the _Corps of Engineers Public Notice No N- 780260 , will comply with the.' Alaska Coastal Management Program and that the project will be conducted in a manner consistent with that program. Any person desiring to present views pertain: ng td' the.' project's compliance or consistency `with the - Alaska Costal Management Program may do so by providing his views' -in c:riting to the . Division of. Governmental Coordination ;•Office Of Management and'' Budget, Pouch, AW, Juneau,. AI( 99811 , _ within . 3" days `of publication . ,of this notice. :Attachment OPERTY UN PR.OPER-ry LINE CHANNEL. nv MEM M11111111 / / AL% /, / 1&"/...6 FILL- AN.CTEIAL- CROSS 40' 3e,' — _ 'JO' 0' iFF 1111111 OPERA-TR:NS. ,W,A,ES-, 11111 WWI / • `••• / / ••■•■/ \ 135:C, t , ■1/4.\ I ENV PLL MATEgiAL_ C1Z cS s PeoPER"rf LINE . OF CHANNEL 4d .p-t Lsi / t ■■■ ■■•■ MO. -TIE" mACKS •MIMID 11,11.1! 4V. ANN Pi %AA-me. LLW 46 3o' 20' 10 0 _A. 1 d 24 5 - 141 • c V 1 a-WS A n.acccas cF ALAGv=24- .0. zci s 7 ci 9 5 DCC 't■.1kitsiac-9_. •••• 0.^.4, 0.1 P2.0 pc-4D E)<P,A.s tcmQ cf.) t.!sizte. SLAt.it liCEL.A4-4D cr4S, Q'Ts-gi■IPF7Ct4,4.-GsEti:M • •we 6••• •■• •=1 I L, CW \ •\ DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION • 140TICE -.OFFTLICATION. STATE WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION' E COWPER, GOVERNOR Telephone: (907) Address: 465-2600 ' P.O. Box 0 Juneau, AK 99811-1800 Any applicant for a Federal license or permitto conduct any activity which may result in any discharge into the .navigable waters must first apply for and obtain certification from the Alaska Department of Environmental Conser-, vation that any such discharge will comply with the Clean Water-Act of 1977. • (PL. 95-217), the-Alaska WaterQuality Standardt'and other applicable State laws. 'By Agreement between the U.S. Army Corps Of Engineers.and the Alaska' Department of Environmental Conservation application for a Department of-the' Army-Permit may also serve is applic4tion for-State:Water Quality tertifica-, - tion when such certification is necessary. Notice is hereby given that the application for a Department of the Army Per- . 'N-780260. • mit described in the Carps of Engineers Public Notice No. - also serves as application for State Water Quality-Certification from the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, as provided in 'Section 401 of the-Clean Water Act-of 1977 (PL 95-217). . • The Department will .review the proposed activity to insure that any discharge to waters of the United States resulting from the referenced project will comply with the Clean Water Act of 1977 (PL 95-217)-the Alaska Water Quality Standards and'other applicable State laws. Any person desiring to comment on the water quality impacts of the proposed project may do so by writing to: . - Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 3601 C Street, Suite 1350 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Telephone: 563-6529 within 30 days o publication of this notice. Attachment 3 Department of the Army. Alaska District, Corps of Engineers Attn: CENPA-CO-R (c) P.O. Box 898 Anchorage, Alaska 99566-0898 POSTAGE & FEES PAID FIRST-CLASS MAIL DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT No. G-5 DIVISION OF GOVERNWENTAt CORE ATTN: PATTY OIELAWSKI 26-LW 1:Y.:NAL' STREET, SUVi 7,-)C ANCn-i:AGE. ALASKA XXXX A L Coastal Project QuGstionnaire and Certification Statement Please answer all questions. Include maps or plan drawings with your packet. An incomplete questionnaire may be returned and will delay the review of your packet. APPLICANT INFORMATION 1 TOIT5R1-347-creniuki- - Nam&of Applicant Cit'• ALA; S P. .C:21C 299-7 Address CD A* As* City State - Zip Code City -• ger 41SG,- 4769 Phone 2. TAD L. 2cne5-es Contact Person ' 5 S kov1.1' Address- PROJECT INFORMATION State Zip Code Phone 1.- Provide a brief description of your project and ALL associated facilities (caretaker facilities, etc.): G.,17,A4-1S Oki n-?<11S-rfQ .L.cczArr..b ou A ra4e. vtoori.11.3EL. /total AP.Amsicit.) Sts4Fati) Starting Date for Project SP:2:41-16 19S9 Ending Date for Project '1%i/T5-E 1989 PROJECT LOCATION - 1. Please give location of project, (Include nearest community or identifiable body of land or water,) /SL44.11) CH,41Q/JC-L-. koD/44c- 41-,4-Sfr-fe Township 275 Range tqw Meridian Section Aliquot Parts SZ 2. Is the project on: (please mark with 1) State Land — Federal. Land— Private Land X * Municipal Land 3. Project is located in Which region of the state (see attached map): Northern,— Southcentral )‹ Southeast PERMIT APPROVALS USGS Map -63, 3e•C) 1. Do you currently have any State or federal approvals for this project? If yes, please list below. Yes (Note: approval means permit or any other form of authorizatiCk ion.1 - Utt ur E".3 Approval Type • ApprovalittmET 81 BUDGE' x piration Date EP 1, 1988 FEDERAL APPROVALS lNATic 1. Will you be placing structures or fills in any of the following: tidal waters, streams, Jakes, or wetlands*? • if You are uncertain whether your proposed project area is in a wetland. contact the Corps of Engineers. Regulatory Branch at (907) 753-2720 for a wetlands determination. If you are outside the Anchorage area, call :oll free 1400-478-2712. If yes, have you applied for or d� you intend to apply for a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) permit? Please indicate at right and describe below. . Yes No Cal ED 2. Have you applied for or do you to apply for a U.S. Environmental Pi Jtion Agency Ycs No National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit? Please indicate at right and [11 describe below. (Note: Any wastewater discharge requires an NPDES permit.) Yes No 3. Have you applied for or do you intend to apply for permits from any other federal agency? - If yes, please list below. c.iency _ Approval Type Date submitted (or intend to submit) DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES APPROVALS 1. Is the proposed project on state-owned land or will you need to cross State lands for access? 2. Is any portion of your project placed below the ordinary high water line of a stream, river, lake or other water body? • 3. Will you be dredging? If yes, location of dredging is: Township '275 Range Meridian Section • Location of disposal site for dredged materials: • Township q7 5 Range V') Meridian Section • 4. Will you be filling with rock, sand or gravel? If yes, amount? •°D c(). • Location of soUrcef Township 127 .5 Ran ,e 9 vs/ Meridian Section 3 2— • Location of area to be filled: Township 27 Range amL Meridian Section 5. Do you plan to use any of thefollowing state-owned resources? Timber • If yes, amount? • • Location of source: Township Range Meridian Section Other Materials • If yes,' what material? Ycs No Yes Yes - (peat, building stone, sac overburden, etc.) Location of source:. Township Range Meridian Section 6. Are you planning to use any fresh water? • If yes, amount (gallons per day)? • Source? C rr'( CU PC31-7'( 7. Will you be building or altering a dam?: 8. Do you plan to drill a geothennaf well?, 9. Will you be exploring for or extracting coal? 10. Will you be exploring for or extracting minerals on state-owned land" 11. Will you be exploring for or extracting oil and gas on state-owned land? 12. Will you be harvesting timber from 10 or more acres? 13. Will you be investigating or removing historical or archaeological resources on state-owned land? 72— Yes No 14. Will the project be located in a f_ of the Alaska State Park System? s El If you answered NO to all questions in this section, you do not need ani approval from the Alaska. Department of Natural Resources. (DNR): Continue to the next section. If you answered YES to ANY questions in this section, contact DNR to identify and obtain necessary application forms. Based on your discussion with DNR, please list (below) the approval type needed and date submitted, Approval Type - _ Date Submitted (or intend to submit). - Have you paid tiie.filing fees required for the DNR permits? If you are not applying for DNR: permits, indicate reason below: - a. (DNR contact) told me on approvals or permits were required on this project. - b. Other.' DEPARTMENT. OF FISH AND GAME APPROVALS (date) that no DNR 1. Will you be working in a stream, river, or lake? (This includes running water or on ice, within the acive floodplain, on islands, the face of the banks, or the stream tideflats down to mean, low tide.) Name of stream or riven Name of lake: If you answered "no ", proceed to question #2. If "yes ", will you be doing any of the following: a) Building a dam, river training structure or instream impoundment? Yes b) Using the water? c). Diverting or altering the natural channel stream? d) Blocking or damming the stream, (temporarily or permanently)? e) Changing the flow of the water or changing the bed? f) Pumping water out of the stream or lake ?.. g) Introducing silt, gravel, rock, petroleum products, debris, chemicals or wastes . of any type into the water ? - - h) Using the stream as a road (even when frozen), or crossing the stream with tracked or wheeled vehicles, log - dragging or excavation equipment (backhoes, bulldozers, etc.)? i) Altering or stabilizing the banks? j) Mining or digging in the beds or banks? k)' Using explosives? 1) Building a bridge (including an ice bridge)? m) Installing a culvert or other drainage structure? n) Constructing a weir? o) Other in- stream structure not-mentioned above? 2. Is your project located in a State Game Refuge, Critical Habitat Area, or State Game Sanctuary? 3. Does your project include the construction and operation of a salmon hatchery? 4. Does your project affect or is it related to a previously permitted salmon hatchery? 5. Does your project include the construction of a shellfish or sea vegetable farm? Yes If you answered NO to all questions in this section, you do not need an approval from the Alaska Department of Fish and Game (DFG). Continue to the next section. If you. answered YES to any of the questions under 1 or 2, contact the. Regional DFG Habitat Division Office for information and application forms. If you answered YES to questions 3, 4 or 5, contact the DFG Private Nonprofit Hatchery Office at the F.R.E.D. division headquarters for information and application forms. Based on your_ discussion with DFG, please list. (below) the approval type needed and date submitted. Yes No Approval Type Date Submitted (or intend to submit) If you are not applying for permits, indicate reason below: a (DFG contact) told me on . (date) that no DFG approvals or pernuts .were required on this project. b. Other: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION APPROVALS 1. Will a discharge of wastewater from industrial or commercial operations occur? (See #2 in "Federal Permits" section)' 2. Will your project generate air emissions from the following: a) Diesel generators totaling more than 10,000 hp? b) Other fossil fuel -fired electric generator, furnace, or boiler totaling greater than 10,000 hp, or 9,000 kWh, or 100,000,000 btu /hr? c) Asphalt plant? d) Incinerator burning rnore than ,1000 lbs. per hour? e) Industrial process? 3. Will a drinking water supply be developed that serves more than a single - family residence? 4. Will you be processing seafood? 5. Will food service be provided to the public or workers? 6. Will the project result in dredging or disposal of fill in wetlands or placement of a structure in waterways? (Note: your application for this activity the Corps of Engineers will also serve as your application to DEC.) 7. Is sewage or greywater disposal - involved or necess 8. Will your project result in the d_ opment of a currently unpermitted facr. , r for the disposal Q of domestic or industrial solid waste? 9. Will your project require offshore drilling or vessel transport of oil, or other petroleum products as cargo, or include. onshore facilities with an effective storage capacity of greater than 10,000 barrels of such products? 10. Will your project, require the . application of oil or pesticides to the surface of the land? If you answered NO to all "questions in this section, you do not need a permit or approval from the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC). Please continue to the next section. . If you answered YES to any of these questions (see #6 Note), contact the DEC Regiona Office for information and application forms. . Q F Based on your discussion with DEC, please list (below) the approval type needed and date submitted. Approval Type Date Submitted (or intend to submit) If you are not applying for permits, indicate reason below: a. (DEC contact) told me on (date) that no DEC approvals or permits were required on this project. b. Other: Certification Statement The information contained herein is, true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I certify that the proposed activity complies with, and will be conducted in a manner consistent with, the Alaska Coastal agenient Prograp --.� 1... Signature of Applicant or Agent To complete your packet, please attach your state permit applications and copies o your federal applications to this questionnaire. 7 5- tLasmt DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION SOUTHCENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE 437 "E" STREET, SUITE 200 ANCHORAGE, AK 99501 David Rogers International Seafoods of Alaska P.O. Box 2997 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 • CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED May 26, 1987 STEVE COWPER, GOVERNOR 274-2533 C: 1E: 1 If ti 1) MAY 2 9 1987 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTOEPT, Dear Mr. Rodgers: RE: Kodiak Harbor 48 , NPACO No. 071-0YD-M-780260 In accordance with Section 401 of the Clean Water Act of 1977 and provi- sions of the Alaska Water Quality Standards, the Department of Environ- mental Conservation is issuing the enclosed Certificate of Reasonable Assurance for the proposed extension of an existing dock in the Near Island Channel, at Kodiak, Alaska. This department action represents only one element of the overall project level coastal management consistency determination issued by the Office of Management and Budget under AS 44.19 and 6 AAC 50.070. Department of Environmental Conservation regulations provide that any person who disagrees with any portion of this decision, may request an adjudicatory hearing in accordance with 18 AAC 15.200-310. The request should be mailed to the Commissioner of the Alaska Department of Environ- mental Conservation, P. O. Box 0, Juneau, Alaska 99811-1800 or delivered to his office at 3220 Hospital Drive, Juneau. Failure to submit a hear- ing request within thirty days of receipt of this letter shall constitute a waiver of that person's right to judicial review of this decision. By copy of this letter we are advising the Corps of Engineers and the Division of Governmental Coordination of our actions and enclosing a copy of the certification for their use. BHL:TR:ras ENCLOSURE cc: ADF&G, Anchorage Corps of Engineers Anchorage District Office EPA, Alaska Operations Office F&WS NMFS Sincerely, H. Lamoreaux Regional Supervisor Doug Redbyrn, ADEC/EQ, Juneau L&WM/DNR, Anchorage iMB/GCU, Anchorage . Parks/DNR, Anchorage v Linda Freed, Kodiak Borough STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION CERTIFICATE OF REASONABLE ASSURANCE A Certificate of Reasonable Assurance, as required by Section Clean Water Act, has been requested by International Seafoods P.O. Box 2997, Kodiak, Alaska 99615, for the installation of long, steel pile supported floating dock, as an extention to dock. 401 of the of Alaska, a 6' X 125' an existing The proposed activity is located at the International Seafoods of Alaska Dock, Near Island Channel, Kodiak, Alaska. Public notice of the application for this certification has been made in accordance with 18 AAC 15.180. Water Quality Certification is required for the proposed activity because the activity will be authorized by a Corps of Engineers permit identified. as Kodiak Harbor 48, NPACO No. 071-OYD-M-780260, and a discharge may result from the proposed activity. Having reviewed the application and comments received in response to the public notice, the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation certi- fies that there is reasonable assurance that the proposed activity, as well as any discharge which may result, is in compliance with the require- ments of Section 401 of the Clean Water Act which includes the Alaska Water Quality Standards, 18 AAC 70, and the Standards of the Alaska Coastal Management Program, 6 AAC 80., provided that: 1) If the wooden- dock is to be treated with a wood preservative containing creosote or pentachlorophenols, the preservative must be injected into, not painted onto, the, wood through a pressure treatment. This type of treatment allows for less leaching of these toxic chemicals into the water. vate Regional. Supervisor SlfaTE 11 2AS OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET DIVISION OF GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION SOUTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE 431 NORTH FRANKLIN P.O. BOX AW, SUITE 101 JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811-0165 PHONE: (907) 465-3562 Registered Mail Return Receipt Requested International Seafoods Attn: Mr. David Rogers P.O. Box 2997 Kodiak, AK 99615 Dear Mr. Rogers: SOUTHCENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE 2600 DENALI STREET SUITE 700 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503-2798 PHONE: (907) 274-1581 May 22, SUBJECT: KODIAK HARBOR 48 STATE I.D. NUMBER AK870417-24A STEVE COWPER, GOVERNOR CENTRAL OFFICE P.O. BOX AW JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811-0165 PHONE: (907) 465-3562 NORTHERN REGIONAL OFFICE 675 SEVENTH AVENUE STATION H FAIRBANKS, ALASKA 99701-4596 PHONE: (907) 456-3084 1987 E C MAY 2 6 " coteautur MEW NEW LOFT The Division of Governmental Coordination (DGC) has completed the consistency review of your project in which you propose to modify an existing dock by constructing a floating wooden pontoon dock measuring 6 feet wide by 120 feet long, which would be secured in place with slide rings to 8 12-inch diameter steel pipe pilings, which would be driven into the sea floor to rejection by a barge-mouthed pile driver. The floating dock would connect to the existing dock via a 12-foot by 6-foot secondary floating wooden pontoon dock and a fixed galvanized steel land ramp 3 feet wide by 39 feet long. All dock lighting would be according to U. S. coast Guard requirements. No dredging or use of dredge material would occur. The floating dock would provide moorage for small boats and/or skiffs, allowing a protected area for boats working for International Seafoods, away from the Near Island Channel. The project is located in Near Island Channel, on Kodiak Island, adjacent to the city of Kodiak, Alaska. This conclusive consistency determination applies to the following State and federal authorizations as per 6 AAC 50: 1. Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) - Certificate of Reasonable Assurance.. 2. U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) - Section 10 Permit - Modification. Based on our review, the Division concurs that the proposal is - consistent with the Alaska Coastal Management Program provided the following stipulation is adopted. 01-A35LH Attn: David Rogers 2 May 22, 1987 Kodiak Harbor 48 State I. D. No. AK870417-24A The stipulation listed below will be placed on the Certificate of Reasonable Assurance issued by the DEC: 1. If the wooden dock is to be treated with a wood preser- vative containing creosote or pentachlorophenols, the preservative shall be injected into, not painted onto, the wood through a pressure treatment. This type of treatment allows for less leaching of these toxic chemicals into the water. This stipulation is necessary to protect water quality and marine habitat by precluding introduction of toxic chemicals per 6 AAC 80.130 Habitats and 6 AAC 80.140 Air, Land, and Water Quality. The text of these standards is provided as-an-enclosure to this letter. If changes to the approved project are proposed prior to or during its siting, construction, or operation, you are required to contact this office immediately to determine if further review and approval of the revised project is necessary. The state reserves the right to enforce compliance with this conclusive consistency determination if the project is changed in any significant way, or if the actual use differs from the approved use contained in the project description. If appropriate, the state may amend the state approvals listed in this conclusive consistency determination. By a copy of this letter we are informing the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers of our finding. You are advised that the Kodiak Harbormaster has expressed some concern regarding the affects of heavy wake and swell conditions on your structure. A copy of these comments are included for your review. Thank you for your cooperation with the Alaska Coastal Management Program. Sincerely, Patt Bielawski Project Cobrdinator Enclosure co/35 Attn: David Rogers Kodiak Harbor 48 State I. D. No. AK870417-24A cc: Greg Curney Department of Natural Resources Tim Rumfelt Department of Environmental Conservation Wayne Dolezal Department of Fish and Game Kay Schmidt Department of Transportation & Public Facilities Linda Freed Kodiak Island Borough John Leeds U. S. Army Corps of Engineers co/35 May 22, 1987 Patty Bielawski OMB -DGC Southcentral Regional Office State of Alaska 2600 Denali Street, Suite 700 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Re: Kodiak Harbor 48 SID AK870417 -24A Dear Patty: Kodiak Island Borough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 -6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 May 20, 1987 The Kodiak Island Borough has reviewed the dock extension project referenced above. We believe that the proposed facility will meet the industrial development policies of the Kodiak Island Borough Coastal Management Program (KIBCMP), therefore we recommend that the project be found, consistent with the KIBCMP and the ACMP. Some concern has been expressed by the City of Kodiak Harbormaster (verbal communication, May 18, .1987) that this type of dock may sustain damage in this location, due to.the wake of boats traveling through the channel. The applicant should be made aware of the possibility of damage occurring to the proposed facility. (Please see additional comments in attached letter dated May 19, 1987.) If you have any questions about these comments, please call me, Sincerely, Linda Freed, Director Community Development Department cc: M. Hayes, DNR T. Rumfelt, DEC W. Dolezal, ADF &G J: Leeds, COE S. Gesko, City of Kodiak D. Rqgers, ISA May 19, 1987 Ms. Linda Freed Planning & Community Development 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Dear Linda: This letter is written in, response to your phone call of May 18, 1987 concerning my comments on Kodiak Harbor Projects, Reference Number M- 780260. I have reviewed the proposed floating dock plan and would like to comment on the location of the project. The Near Island Channel is 'a busy waterway with vessel traffic of all sizes and types transiting it year round. Regardless of the posted speed limit of 5 miles per hour in the channel, the proposed float system will be exposed to heavy wake and swell conditions. Large vessels, such as the State Ferry TUSTUMEEENA, displaces 3100 long tons of sea water at idle speed in the channel area. A good fendering system and tie -up procedures should be implemented to protect moored vessels as well as persons using the float system. If you have any more questions, please feel free to contact me at anytime. Sincerely, PORT OF KODIAK 1/ 474A/16e-- G. V. /P1cCorkle Harbormaster /Port Administrator • POST OFFICE BOA 1397, KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 PHONE (907) 486 -3224 a�uwuL? Ufl ALAI OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET DIVISION OF GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION sotm��sT.laNCNAL mica at mom putout POUCH A W. SLIM MI JUNEAU. ALASKA MILAN d PHONE (907) 4.54582 PROJECT TITLE: aOMMC@AfUL AMIC %OFFICE Mean CENAU STREET SLMTE 700 ANCHORAGE ALASKA 11•10.27111 PHONE: (1107) 2746fSI1 PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET k ,4'4( k NORTfE1M1 REGIONAL OM= 075 SEVENTH AVENUE STATION M FARIEANKI ALASKA SORH.4 N PHONE 11107) 4564004 STATE I.D. NUMBER /REVIEWING OFFICE: AX 87/0/7-02,1 / 9 DGC CONTACT :C-'��t%s APPLICANT CONDUCTING ACTIVITY: � )4 f¢1 f e & K/0 DIRECT FEDERAL ACTION: YES__ REVIEW TYPE: CONSISTENCY ACTIVITY TYPE: OIL AND GAS UTILITIES /FACILITIES_ MINING_ AN ILCA OCSL& NEPA__ HER PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL_ LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN NECEitito APR c c 198/ TIMBER OTHER PROJECT LOCATION: WATERBODY /MANAGEMENT AREA /SUBREGIONAL U /NIT: NEAREST COASTAL DISTRICT: 1C a c 2,r', ,�' c , c7 cc PROJECT INSIDE THE DISTRICT BOUNDARY: YES NO DISTRICT PLAN APPROVED: YES) NO PENDING OEVELOPME TDE I(4 /717,414 REVIEW MILESTONES: DAY 1 �t ( /7 / 9' 7 REVIEW SCHEDULE: 30-Day 50 -Day_) OTHER REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BY: 7) ' 1/� /. ?7 O1.*3QLM COMMENTS DUE BY: %`i°7) Jfi PROJECT STATUS NOTIFICATION BY: Q iw i e ill f S'7 DECISION DEADLINE: - ta/.n.t_ 3f /y 7 PROJECT PREVIOUSLY __VIEWED UNDER STATE ID NO. STATE APPROVALS (LIST AGENCY /APPROVAL TYPE /I.D. NUMBER): 4 FEDERAL APPROVALS (LIST AGENCY /APPROVAL TYPE /I.D. NUMBER): EXTENSION GRANTED FOR: 7 ra2 (9 FORMAL INFORMATION,REQUEST _ PUBLIC HEARING. HELD__ PROJECT IN O.O.B. FIELD REVIEW MISCELLANEOUS APPLICANT REQUEST DNR DISPOSAL SMCRA SUALLY CGKPLEX . PROJECTS_ ELEVATION TO DIRECTORS: YES NO IF YES, BY: ELEVATION TO COMMISSIONERS: YES IF YES, BY: CLOCK STOPPED ON CLOCK RESTARTED ON AL-STOPPED FOR DAYS ACTION`' AT= CLOSEOUT: CLOSE -OUT DATE ACTUAL NUMBER OF DAYS IN REVIEW DISTRICT COMMENTS RECEIVED: YES NO FOR CONCLUSIVE CONSISTENCY DETERMINATIONS: CONSISTENT__,_ CONSISTENT WITH STIPULATIONS INCONSISTENT WITHDRAWN FOR OIL AND GAS LEASE SALES RECOMMENDED: NO CHANGE CONDITIONS TRACT DELETIONS DELAY FOR OTHER REVIEWS: COMMENTS SUBMITTED OTHER i piww. DISTRIBUTION LIST April 17, 1987 [613] Ms. Judith Bittner, Department of Natural Resources Division of Parks, Anchorage [3] Mr. Bob Flint, Department of Environmental Conservation, Anchorage [867] Ms. Linda Freed, Kodiak [268] Mr. Uwe L. Gross, Kodiak [1220] Ms. Meg Hayes, Department of Natural Resources, Anchorage [9] Ms. Nancy Holguin, Office of Management and Budget, Juneau [1072] Mr. Neil Johannsen, Department of Natural Resources Division of Parks, Anchorage [303] Mr. Michael O'Brien, Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, Anchorage [287] Mr. Gordon Puller, Kodiak Area Native Association, Kodiak [859] The Honorable Jerome M. Selby, Kodiak [371] Mr. Lance Trasky, Department of Fish and Game, Anchorage rs'`, 0 i *a * *• * * '* * * * * * * * * * * * * PLEASE ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS. PLEASE INCLUDE MAPS OR PLAN DRAWINGS WITH YOUR PACKET. AN INCOMPLETE QUESTIONNAIRE MAY BE RETURNED AND WILL DELAY THE REVIEW OF YOUR PROJECT. PART A 01 Applicant: 1h311E24iA*5.AL— Sr=4r0CDDS Contact Person: - ti. °R-CeSe..5 Address: o. 231G? Address: 4&4—+0hi Phone (day): ?O7. 4-4 Phone (day): `j4 -vryl Brief description of project or activity, including associated facilities C S1.4CitOtJ Or i -t- • ` I T> =. p 1k-, t.i S t i QC 1. , c -A-LAs` ta- ti.3C . Starting date for project N J $- 7 Ending date for project 3O -/A4'1.4987 Location of Project (include nearest community or identifiable land or wat r body): 1� a.. Q I S L 44 1 C ht F-3 1 k� O C � Gi c I cn P O O,A.E., Meridian .Township Range Section Aliquot Parts USGS Map Is the project on: private land X municipal land state land ownership not known federal land Identify which region of the State the project is in (see attached map): northern southcentral ? southeast PART B * .* * * * * * * * * * * * Yes No 1. Do you currently have any State or federal approvals /permits for ?C this project? If yes, please list below. Permit /Approval Type Permit /Approval # Expiration Date 2. Will you be placing structures, or placing fills in any of the following: tidal waters, streams, lakes, wetlands *? * If you are uncertain whether your proposed project area is in a wetland, contact the Corps of Engineers, Regulatory Branch at (907) 753 -2720 for . a wetlands determination. If you are outside. the Anchorage area call toll free 1- 800 - 478 -2712. If yes, have you appri0 for or do you intend to apply for a U.S.' .Army Corps of Engineers (COE) permit? (The COE has jurisdiction over activities described above.) Please indicate in Question No. 3 below, when you applied to the COE or when you intend to apply. . Have you applied or do you intend to apply for other permits from any federal agency? If yes, list below. Date you submitted or Agency ( Permit/ pproval Type plan to submit application .e H e7 Yes No * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *,* * * 1.107E: c + t sr.4 -1TC J ul i71-1 4>kmat ( 0'e4 PART C DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES /434Vc-r-E-5s A.13 ,q.PPLJGQ-17au 1=3 ?H 1 uvE 7m PR.M iw -n pE D Q J S I! 1. Is the proposed project on State -owned land or will you need to cross State lands for access? (Note: In addition to State owned uplands, the State has jurisdiction over most lands below the ordinary high water line of streams, rivers, lakes, and line of mean high tide of the tidelands seaward for three miles.) 2. Is any portion of your project placed below the ordinary high water }C line of a stream, river, lake or other water body? 3. Will you be dredging? If yes, location of dredging: Meridian (M) Township (T) Range (R) Section (Sec) Location of disposal site for dredged material: M T R Sec 4. Will you be filling with rock, sand or gravel? X If yes, amount? Location of source: M R Sec Location of area to be filled: M T R Sec 5. Do you plan to use any of the following state -owned resources? Timber If yes, amount? Location of source: M T R Sec '1C Other Materials If yes, what material? l 4(peat, building stone, silt, overburden, etc.) Location of source: M T R Sec 6. Are you planning to use any water? If yes, amount? Source? 7. Will you be building or altering a dam? 8. Do you plan to drill a geothermal well? 9. Will you be exploring for or extracting coal? 10. Will you be exploring for or extracting minerals on state -owned land? 11. Will you be exploring for or extracting oil and gas on state -owned land? 12. Will you be harvesting timber from 10 or more acres? 13. Will you be investigating or removing historic or archeological resources on State -owned lands? 14. Will the project be located in a unit of the State Park System (including the Kenai River Special Management Area, State Recreation Areas, State Historic Sites, State Preserves, etc.)? IF YOU CORRECTLY ANSWERED NO TO ALL THESE QUESTIONS, YOU DO NOT NEED APPROVAL FROM THE ALASKA DEPARTMENT—UF NATURAL RESOURCES (DNR). GO TO PART D. Yes IF YOU ANSWERED YES TO ANY OF THESE QUESTIONS, CONTACT DNR TO IDENTIFY AND OBTAIN ANY NECESSARY APPLICATION FORMS. If you have already contacted DNR, are you now submitting application(s) for permits or approvals? If yes, list DNR approvals for which you are now applying: Have you paid the filing fees required for the ONR permits? If you are not applying for permits, indicate the reason below: � 01C a. --� /fit r C .4 1J(DNR contact) told me on 3f3.87 (date) that no DNR approvals or permits were required for this project. b. Other. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 4 No 7( 7< J t DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME Yes No 11. Wi11 you be working in a stream, river, or lake (this includes running water or on ice, within the active fodplain, on islands, the face of the banks, or the stream tideflats down to mean low tide)? Name of stream or river Name of lake tf no, go to question number 3. If yes, will you be doing any of the following: a) Building of a dam, river. training structure or instream impoundment? b) Using the water? c) Diverting or altering the natural channel stream? d) Blocking or damming the stream (temporarily or permanently)? e) Changing the flow of the water or changing the bed? f) Pumping water out of the stream or lake? g) Introducing silt, gravel, rock, petroleum products, debris, chemicals, or wastes of any type into the water? h) Using the stream as a road (even when frozen), or crossing the stream with tracked or wheeled vehicles, log- dragging or excavation equipment (backhoes, bulldozers, etc.)? i) Altering or stabilizing the banks? j). Mining or digging in the beds or banks? k) Using explosives? 1) Building a bridge (including an ice bridge)? m) Installing a culvert or other drainage structure? n) Constructing a weir? 3. Is your project located in a State Game Refuge, Critical Habitat Area, or State Game Sanctuary? 4. Does your project include the construction and operation of a salmon hatchery? . Does your project affect or is it related . to a previously permitted salmon hatchery? IF YOU CORRECTLY ANSWERED NO TO ALL THESE QUESTIONS, YOU DO NOT NEED A PERMIT FROM THE ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME (DFG). GO TO PART E. IF YOU ANSWERED YES TO QUESTIONS 1 -3, CONTACT THE REGIONAL HABITAT DIVISION OFFICE IrIDENTIFY AND OBTAIN ANY NECESSARY APPLICATION FORMS. -5- IF YOU ANSWERED YES TO QUESTIONS 4-5, CONTACT THE PRIVATE NONPROFIT HATCHERY OFFICE AT F.R.E.D. DIVISION HEADQUARTERS TO OBTAIN INFORMATION AND ANY NECESSARY APPLICATION FORMS. Yes No If you have already contacted DFG, are you now submitting an application for pirmit(s)? If yes, list DFG approvals for which you are now applying: If you are not applying for permits, indicate the reason below: a. (DFG contact) told me on (date) that no OF& approvals or permits were required for this project. . Other. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PART E DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION 1. Will a discharge of wastewater from industrial or commercial operations occur? 2. Will your project generate air emissions from the following: a) Diesel generators totaling more than 10,000 hp?. b) Other fossil fuel-fired electric generator, furnace, or boiler totaling greater than 10,000 hp, or 9,000kw, or 100,000,000 btu/hr? c) Asphalt plant? d) Incinerator burning more than 1000 lbs. per hour? e) Industrial process? . Will a drinking water supply be developed that serves more than a single-family residence? 4. Will you be processing seafood? 5. Will food service be provided to the public or workers? 6. Will the project result in dredging or disposal of fill in wetlands or placement of a structure in waterways? (Note: If you are applying to the Corps of Engineers for a permit for this activity, the Corps will automatically request certification from DEC.) 7. Is on-lot sewage or greywater disposal involved or necessary? 8. Will your project result in the development of a currently unpermitted facility for the disposal of domestic or industrial solid waste? 9. Will your project require offshore drilling or vessel transport of oil, or other petroleum products as cargo, or include onshore facilities with an effective storage capacity of greater than 10,000 barrels of such products? - 6 - Yes No 10. Will your project require the application of oil or pesticides to the surface of the land? IF YOU CORRECTLY ANSWERED NO TO ALL THESE QUESTIONS, YOU DO NOT NEED A PERMIT OR OTHER APPROVAL FROM THCALASKA'DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION (DEC). GO TO PART F. • IF YOU ANSWERED YES TO ANY OF THESE QUESTIONS (SEE CLARIFYING NOTE IN NO. 6, ABOVE) CONTACT THE DEC REGIONAL OFFICE TO IDENTIFY AND OBTAIN ANY NECESSARY APPLICATION FORMS. If you have already contacted the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, are you now submitting an application for permit(s)? If yes, list the permits for which you are now applying: If you are not applying for permits, indicate the reason below: a. (DEC contact) told me on (date) that no DEC approvals or permits were required for this project. b. Other. * * * * * * * * * * * * * PART F T the best of my knowledge, this information is accurate and complete. LY-Car: Signed Date g� TO COMPLETE YOUR PACKET, PLEASE ATTACH YOUR STATE PERMIT APPLICATIONS AND COPIES OF YOUR FEDERA APPLICATIONS TO THIS QUESTIONNAIRE. PLEASE SUBMIT YOUR PACKET AS INDICATED ON PAGE ONE. cp questionnaire /PERMIT US Army Corps of Engineers UjuAic No hio', of ApplicatIon Alaska District Regulatory Branch (1145b) for Permit Post Office Box 898 Anchorage, Alaska 99506-0898 OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT &- BUDGET APR 17 1987 GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION Interested parties are hereby notified that an application has been received for a Department of the Army permit for certain work in waters of the United States, as described below and shown on the attached plan. PUBLIC NOTICE DATE: April 16, 1987 EXPIRATION DATE: May 18, 1987 REFERENCE NUMBER: M-780260 WATERWAY NUMBER: Kodiak Harbor 48 APPLICANT: International Seafoods of Alaska, Incorporated (ISAI), Post Office Box 2997, Kodiak, Alaska 99615. LOCATION: In Near Island Channel, on Kodiak Island, adjacent to the city of Kodiak, Alaska, at lat. 57°47'26"N., long. 152°23'35"W. WORK: The applicant proposes to modify an existing dock by constructing a floating wooden pontoon dock measuring 6' wide by 125' long, and secured in place with slide rings to 8 12" diameter steel pipe pilings, which would be driven into the sea floor to rejection by a barge-mounted pile driver. The floating dock would connect to the existing dock via a 12'x6' secondary floating wooden pontoon dock and a fixed galvanized steel land ramp 3' wide by 39' long. All dock lighting would be according to U.S. Coast Guard requirements. No dredging or use of dredge material would occur. PURPOSE: The floating dock would provide moorage for small boats and/or skiffs, allowing a protected area for boats working for ISAI, away from the Near Island Channel. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Please contact Mr. David L. Rogers, ISAI, Post Office Box 2§97, Kodiak, Alaska 99615. WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION: A permit for the described work will not be issued until a certification or waiver of certification as required under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (Public Law 95-217), has been received from the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation. COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT ACT CERTIFICATION: Section 307(c)(3) of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended by 16 U.S.C. 1456(c)(3), requires the applicant to certify that the described activity affecting land or water uses in the Coastal Zone complies with the Alaska Coastal Management Program. A permit will not be issued until the Office of Management and. Budget, Division of Governmental Coordination has concurred with the applicant's certification. PUBLIC HEARING: Any person may request, in writing, within the comment period specified in this notice, that a public hearing be held to consider this application. Requests for public hearings shall state, with particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing. CULTURAL RESOURCES: The latest published version of the National Register of Historic Places has been consulted for the presence or absence of registered properties, or properties listed as being eligible for inclusion therein, and this worksite is not registered property or property listed as being eligible for inclusion in the Register. Consultation of the National Register constitutes the extent of cultural resource investigations by the District Engineer, and he is otherwise unaware of the presence of such resources. Presently, unknown archeological, scientific, prehistorical, or historical data may be lost or destroyed by work under the requested permit. ENDANGERED SPECIES: The project area is within the known or historic range of the Gray Whale and the Humpback Whale. Preliminarily, the described activity will not affect endangered species, or their critical habitat designated as endangered or threatened, under- the Endangered Species Act of 1973(87 Stat. 844). This application is being coordinated with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service. Any comments they may have concerning endangered or threatened wildlife or plants or their critical habitat will be considered in our final assessment of the described work. FEDERAL SPECIES OF CONCERN: The following Federal species of concern may use the project area: Steelhead Trout, Sockeye Salmon, Chinook Salmon, Coho Salmon, Sea Otter, and the Bald Eagle. FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT: Evaluation of the described activity will include conformance with appropriate State or local flood plain standards; consideration of alternative sites and methods of accomplishment; and weighing of the positive, concentrated and dispersed, and short and long-term impacts on the flood plain. SPECIAL AREA DESIGNATION: None. EVALUATION: The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impacts including cumulative impacts of the proposed activity and its intended use on the public interest. Evaluation of the probable impacts which the proposed activity may have on the public interest requires a careful weighing of all those factors which become relevant in each particular case. The benefits which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. The decision whether to authorize a proposal, and if so the conditions under which it will be allowed to occur, are therefore determined by the outcome of the general balancing process. That decision should reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. All factors which may be relevant to the proposal must be considered including the cumulative effects thereof. Among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, floodplain values, land use, navigation, shore erosion and accretion, recreation, water, supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, • safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving 404 discharges, a permit will be denied if the discharge that would be authorized by such permit would not comply with the Environmental Protection Agency's 404(b)(1) guidelines. Subject to the preceding sentence and any other applicable guidelines or criteria (see Sections 320.2 and 320.3), a permit will be granted unless the District Engineer determines that it would be contrary to the public interest. AUTHORITY: This permit • will be issued or denied under the following • authorities: (X) Perform work in or affecting navigable waters of the United States - Section 10, Rivers and Harbors Act 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403). Comments on the described work, with the reference number, should reach this office no later than the expiration date of this Public Notice to become part of the record and be considered in the decision. If further information is desired concerning this notice, contact Mr. John C. Leeds, III at (907) 753-2712. •A plan, Notice of Application for Certification of Consistency with the Alaska Coastal Management Program, and Notice of Application for State Water Quality Certification are attached to this Public Notice. Attachments District Engineer U.S. Army, Corps of Engineers "ARBOR rvl (NJ •-•=t,4,1 'coo r-4• CAA. 16S1S 9 z \A\A/ c.C4. LZ 1 '7='- BO' cr7 t - z --7e. ts-Z6.0 CC— ELM-404-71=k, PIL.3-PS P I ez b..<7 , ...7%"? 1 A-A zo' t " = iA‹ 77PC7 CA'.7Ct■1 -(: DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION NOTICE OF APPLICATION FO R STATE WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION Telephone: (907) 465 -2600 Address: P.O. Box 0 Juneau, AK 99811 -1800 Any applicant for a Federal license or permit to conduct any activity which may result in any discharge into the navigable waters must first apply for and obtain certification from the Alaska Department of Environmental Conser- vation that any such discharge will comply with the Clean Water Act of 1977 (PL 95 -217), the Alaska Water Quality Standards and other applicable State laws. By Agreement between the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation application for a 0epartment of the Army Permit may also serve as application for State Water Quality Certifica- tion when such certification is necessary. Notice is hereby given that the application for a Department of the Army Per- mit described in the Corps of Engineers Public Notice No. M- 780260 also serves as application for State Water Quality Certification from the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, as provided in Section 401 of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (PL 95 -217). The Department will review the proposed activity to insure that any discharge to waters of the United States resulting from the referenced project will comply with the Clean Water Act of 1977 (PL 95 -217) the Alaska Water Quality Standards and other applicable State laws. Any person desiring to comment on the water quality impacts of the proposed project may do so by writing to: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation Southeastern Regional Office P.O. Box 2420 Juneau, Alaska 99803 Telephone: 789 -3151 within 30 days of publication of this notice. Attachment 2 w STEVE COWPER, GOVERNOR DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION 465 -2601 POVCNO —,FJ AOW1 NOTICE OF- APPLICATION FOR STATE WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION Any applicant for a Federal license or.pe_-mit to conduct any activity which may result in any discharge into the navigable waters must first apply for. and obtain certification from the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation that any such discharge will comply with the Clean Water Act of 1977 (PL 95 -217), the Alaska Water Quality Standards and other applicable State laws. By Agreement between time U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation application for a Department of the Army Permit may also serve as applica- tion for State Water Quality Certification when such certification is necessary. Notice is hereby given that the application for a Deparent of the Army Permit described in the Corps of Engineers Public Notice No. M- 780260 also serves as application for State Water Quality. Certification from the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, as provided in Section 401 of the Clean Water At of 1977 (PL 95 -217): The Department'will review the proposed activity to insure that any dis- charge to waters of the United States resulting from the referenced pro- ject will comply with the Clean Water Act of 1977 (PL 95 -217) the Alaska Water Quality Standards and other applicable State laws. Any person desiring to comment on the water quality impacts of the pro- posed project may do so by writing to: within 30 days Attachment 3 Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation Southcentral Regional Office. 437 "E" Street, Second Floor Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Telephone: 274 -2533 of publication of this notice. OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET DIVISION OF GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ' SOUTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE 431 NORTH FRANKLIN POUCH AW, SUITE 101 JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811-0165 PHONE: (907) 465-3562 Registered Mail Return Receipt Requested SOUTHCENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE 2600 DENALI STREET SUITE 700 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503-2798 PHONE: (907) 274-1581 International Seafoods of AK Attn+- Ms. Elizabeth_Byrne P.O. Box 2997 Kodiak, AK 99615 Dear Ms. Byrne: March 27, / BILL SHEFFIELD, GOVERNOR , CENTRAL OFFICE POUCH AW JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811-0165 PHONE: (907) 465-3562 NORTHERN REGIONAL OFFICE 675 SEVENTH AVENUE STATION H FAIRBANKS, ALASKA 99701-4596 PHONE: (907) 456-3084 1986 SUBJECT: INTERNATIONAL SEAFOODS OF AK/NPDES NO. AK-000130-9 STATE I.D. NUMBER AK860210-16A The Division of Governmental Coordination (DGC) has completed the consistency review of your project in which the EPA proposes to reissue a permit to the International. Seafoods of Alaska facility located at Kodiak, Alaska. The facility processes seafood and discharges waste into receiving waters of St. Paul Harbor. This conclusive consistency determination applies to the following State and federal authorizations as per 6 AAC 50: 1. Alaska Department of Environmental Coordination (DEC) Certificate of Reasonable Assurance. 2. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) - NPDES permit No. AK-000130-9. Based on our review, the Division concurs that the proposal is consistent with the Alaska Coastal Management Program (ACMP) provided the following stipulations are adopted. The stipulations listed below will be placed on the Certificate of Reasonable Assurance issued by DEC: 1. Part I.A.1.c. shall change the pH range from 6.0 - 9.0 to 6.5 - 8.5 standard pH units. 2. Part I.B.2. shall be changed to read as follows: APR 7 1986 01-A35LH Attn: Ms. Elizabeth Byrne 2 International Seafoods of AK /NPDES State I.D. No. AK860210 -16A March 27, 1986 Waste Disposal Practices The permittee shall develop a plan detailing procedures to be implemented for proper alternate disposal of collected seafood waste in the event the primary waste disposal method (i.e. reduction plant, barging, etc.) is unavailable. Discharging waste to St. Paul Harbor and Near Island Channel is not an alternative. The permittee shall also review its present waste handling techniques to identify possible areas of improvement in terms of pollution abatement. This review should include, but is not limited to, collection- techniques, `transport systems, _use ..of- screening systems, and an adequate description of the existing treatment system in use. The following can be initiated to improve recovery of waste solids: a. Do not put non - contact cooling water into the waste streams. b.. Dry clean -up prior to plant washdown. c. Water conservation techniques. i. high pressure /low volume hoses ii. automatic nozzle shut -offs iii. belt conveyors /pneumatic transport vs. flames d. Manual collection of waste solids. The plan and review shall be submitted in accordance with the schedule set forth in Part I.C.1. 3. Part -include a stipulation that-requires the discharge to be in compliance with Alaska Water Quality Standards (18 AAC 70). 4. Part III.F. add - ...except as provided in Part I :A.1.g. 5. Part III.G.3. add - c. Failure of a third party operator (barging company, reduction facility) to provide service is not justification for bypassing. These stipulations are necessary to prevent degradation of water quality by preventing large fluctuations in pH and by preventing introduction of wastes and pollutants. These stipulations insure backup system plans are in place in the event of a failure of the co4 /21 Attn: Ms. Elizabeth Byrne 3 International Seafoods of AK/NPDES State I.D. No. AK860210-16A March 27, 1986 primary system and will therefore reduce the probability of a ,bypass discharge. These stipulations are necessary to insure the consistency of discharge activity with 6 AAC 80.140 Air, Land and Water Quality. The text of this standard is provided as an enclosure to this letter. If you disagree with this decision, you may appeal to the U.S. Secretary of Commerce in Washington, D.C., as provided in 15 CFR 930.125, Subpart H. Grounds for this appeal are limited. to: 1. a claim that the proposal, while inconsistent with the Alaska Coastal Management Program, is consistent with lthe-objectives or purposes of the Federal •Coastal Zone Management Act, 15 U.S.C. 1451-1462, 15 CFR 930.121; or • 2. a claim that the proposal is necessary in the interest of national security, 15 CFR 930.122. Your appeal must be filed within 30 days of your receipt of this letter. Please contact this office if you need further informa- tion about these procedures. If changes to the proposal as authorized by this finding are made during its implementation, you are required to contact this office to determine if a review of the revision is necessary. By a copy of this letter we are informing the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency of-our finding. Thank you for your cooperation with the Alaska Coastal Management Program. Enclosure co4/21 Sincerely, - Louisa B. Rand Project Coordinator Attn: Ms. Elizabeth Byrne 4 International Seafoods of AK/NPDES State I.D. No. AK860210-16A March 27,,1986 cc: cc: Priscilla Lukens Department of Natural Resources - via PROFS Julie Howe Department of Environmental Conservation - via PROFS Denby Lloyd Department of Fish and Game - via PROFS Linda Freed Kodiak Island Borough Valerie Payne U. S. Environmental Protection Agency MEMORANDUM State of Alaska TO: FROM: Louisa Rand Project Coordinator Div. of Governmental Coordination FILENO: Office of Management & Budget DATE: Dennis D. Kelso Deputy Commissioner Department of Fish and Game BY: Denby S. Lloyd Habitat Biologist Region IV Habitat Division Department of Fish and Game 02 -001 A(Rev. 10/79) TELEPHONE NO: SUBJECT: February 14, 1986 0286 -IV -0027 267 -2342 NPDES AK- 000035 -3 International Seafoods SID AK860210 -16A FEB 2 0 1986 The Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF &G) has reviewed the seafood waste discharge permit referenced above. We- have no objection to the project as proposed so long as state water quality standards are maintained. Pursuant to 6 AAC 80.010(b), the ADF &G recommends that this project be found to be consistent with the Standards of the Alaska Coastal Management Program and the Kodiak Island Borough Coastal Management Program. We appreciate the opportunity to comment. If you have any specific questions, please contact Denby Lloyd (267- 2333). cc: J. Howe, DEC M. Hayes, DNR LiL. Freed, Kodiak Island Borough 2-0 8 - Kodiak IslandBorough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486 -5736 Patty Bielawski, Project Coordinator OMB -DGC, Southcentral Regional Office 2600 Denali Street, Suite 700 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Re: NPDES AK- 000035 -3 SID AK 860210-16A International Seafoods Dear Ms. Bielawski: February 14, 1986 The Kodiak Island Borough has reviewed the seafood processing facilities discharge permit referenced above. We have no objection to the project as proposed as long as state water quality standards are met. The Kodiak Island Borough recommends that this project be found consistent with the Alaska Coastal.Management Program (ACMP) and the Kodiak Island Borough Coastal Management Program (KIBCMP). If you have any questions about these comments, please call me. Sincerely, nda Freed, Director Community Development Department pm cc: Sam Gesko, City of Kodiak B. Lamoreaux, DEC D. Lloyd, ADF &G M. Hayes, DNR DISTRIBUTION LIST February 10, 1986 [613] Ms. Judith Bittner, Department of Natural Resources Division of Parks, Anchorage [1028] Ms. Bonnie Borchick, Department of Commerce and Economic Development, Juneau [256] Mr. Norman A. Cohen, Department of Fish and Game, Juneau [3] Mr. Bob Flint, Department of Environmental Conservation, Anchorage [867] Ms. Linda Freed, Kodiak [1220] Ms. Meg Hayes, Department of Natural Resources, Anchorage [9] Ms. Nancy Holguin, Office of Management and Budget, Juneau [1072] Mr. Neil Johannsen, Department of Natural Resources Division of Parks, Anchorage [200] Mr. Wayne Longaere, Department of Community and Regional Affairs, Juneau [287] Ms. Ione Norton, Kodiak [303] Mr. Michael O'Brien, Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, Anchorage [859] The Honorable Tom Peterson, Kodiak [1012] Mr. Jerome M. Selby, Kodiak [321] Ms. Elizveta Shadura, Department of Natural Resources, Juneau [371] Mr. Lance Trasky, Department of Fish and Game, Anchorage [268] Mr. Jack Wick, Kodiak FEB 1 4 oits SEM TJF &US OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND WIDGET DIVISION OF GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION SOUTHEAST' rearm. 431 NORTH MANKL 4 POUCH A W. SUITE 101 JUNEAU. ALASKA Ne11-0166 PHONE: 0107) PROJECT TITLE: SOUTHCENTHOL REGIONAL MACE 2000 OENAU STREET SUITE 700 AACMORAGE. ALASKA MORE 1907) 2741801 PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET • comm. 0.11CO POUCH A W JUNEAU. ALASKA 5N11-0111 RCM: (907) 40345N NORTHERN RECSONAL ORME 875 SEVENTH AVENUE STATION H PAMSANKS. ALASKA 007014590 P: 1pO7) Ase.xu STATE I.D. NUMBER /REVIEWING OFFICE: AK 86 007/P - /4 DGC CONTACT: / /9' APPLICANT CONDUCTING ACTIVITY: 1J7 ` ,/ DIRECT FEDERAL ACTION: REVIEW TYPE: CONSISTENCY ACTIVITY TYPE: OIL AND GAS YES NO ANILCA_ OCSLA NEPA OTHER PUBLIC UTILITIES /FACILITIES PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL /COMMERCIAL / LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN TIMBER OTHER PROJECT LOCATION: MINING WATERBODY /MANAGEMENT AREA / SUBREGIONAL UNIT : S/1-2 /S • C144NNE NEAREST COASTAL DISTRICT: k-O DLA /G f SL N PROJECT INSIDE THE DISTRICT BOUNDARY: DISTRICT PLAN APPROVED: YES,/9 NO REVIEW MILESTONES: DAY 1 YES )C NO PENDING Oi/A-KI--y / 0 .FEB 14 1 ido REVIEW SCHEDULE: 30 -Day 50- Day,- OTHER REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BY: 7fctird COMMENTS DUE BY: ,I / 7/) 9 P h PROJECT STATUS NOTIFICATION BY: 7%) u. aS /9t4 01436tH DECISION DEADLINE: ar // 1 98G. PROJECT PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED UNDER STATE ID NO. STATE APPROVALS- (LIST AGENCY /APPROVAL TYPE /I.D. NUMBER): 4o1 e.�1 FEDERAL APPROVALS (LIST AGENCY /APPROVAL TYPE /I.D. NUMBER): N 2 S (nip • i41 - - ooco EXTENSION GRANTED FOR: FORMAL INFORMATION.REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING RELD PROJECT IN U.O.B. FIELD REVIEW MISCELLANEOUS APPLICANT REQUEST____ UNUSUALLY COMPLEX PROJECT_ ELEVATION TO DIRECTORS: YES NO IF YES, BY: DNR DISPOSAL SMCRA ELEVATION TO COMMISSIONERS: YES IF YES, BY CLOCK STOPPED ON CLOCK RESTARTED ON WAS STOPPED FOR DAYS ACTION AT CLOSEOUT: CLOSE -OUT DATE ACTUAL NUMBER OF DAYS IN REVIEW DISTRICT COMMENTS RECEIVED: YES NO FOR CONCLUSIVE CONSISTENCY DETERMINATIONS: CONSISTENT > :iw:CONSISTENT WITH STIPULATIONS INCONSISTENT WITHDRAWN FOR OIL AND GAS LEASE SALES RECOMMENDED: NO CHANGE CONDITIONS TRACT DELETIONS DELAY, FOR OTHER REVIEWS: COMMENTS SUBMITTED piwwe OTHER OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET DIVISION OF GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION SOUTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE 431 NORTH FRANKLIN rROUDAlr iyy TE 101 11 -0165 ; • JUN 10 1985 SOUTHCENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE 2600 DENALI STREET SUITE 700 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503.2798 8111 SHEFFIELD, GOVERNOR CENTRAL OFFICE POUCH AW JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811 -0165 PHONE: (907) 465.3562 NORTHERN REGIONAL OFFICE 675 SEVENTH AVENUE STATION H FAIRBANKS, ALASKA 99701 -4596 PHONE: (907) 274-1581 PHONE: (907) 456 -3084 Certification of Consistency with the Alaska Coastal Management Program \Plater Permits & Compliance Branch Permit 307(c) (3) (A) of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 as amended by 16 USC 1456(c)(3) requires that appli- cants for federal permits to conduct activities affecting land or water uses in Alaska's coastal area must provide certification that the activities will comply with the standards of the Alaska Coastal Management Program. The proposed activity described in your federal permit application may require certification. By filling out the attached coastal project questionnaire you, together with the State's resource agencies, will not only determine the necessity for this certification, but you will also find out if other State approvals are needed before your proposed activity can proceed. This will also assist you in filling out your federal permit application. Upon W receipt of the signed, dated certification, a public J Z notice can be issued and review of your project can begiA2 Fa- For additional - information on the Alaska Coastal Manager° s ment Program and project review procedures, contact ong281 UJ z the offices indicated on this letterhead. E- ' ZD Please submit a signed certification and applicable StWE m WIC permit applications to the appropriate State agency L > O indicated in the questionnaire. You .must also submit a z 0 0 signed certification to the aloes* with your federal permit application. CERTIFICATION STATEMENT I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the proposed activity described in the 1,t-p.p5 application complies with the approved Alaska Coastal Management Program, and will be conducted in a manner consistent with such program. Attached is a copy of*a comp eted coastal project questionnaire. Sigjiature o$f Applicant fc /permit /blank Attachment fl -A35LH EgAj\i©- AhL.$ncra.E� ACEC— 11 OMe,iCZrn - r /16/? - \A( f- W t7 0 m 2 ea J}. 3 3W orC - - COASTAL. PROJECT QUESTICiri -AIRE 9/19/84 The State has a system for reviewing and processing resource - related permits, leases, an( approvals for proposed projects in coastal areas of Alaska. As a participant in this process you are required to complete this questionnaire. The questionnaire will help you identifl approvals required for your project (or a specific phase of your project) from th( Departments of Fish and Game, Natural Resources and Environmental Conservation. Attached is a list of regional agency contacts and a map of the coastal area with the region: delineated. We urge you- to contact the appropriate agency staff when you are answering that agency's questions. If you need several approvals you must submit the packet of applications for those approval: along with this questionnaire to the appropriate office in the region where the propose( project is to occur. Your project cannot be reviewed until all applications are received Please use the' following contacts for submittal: 11 Packets that include applications to more than one State agency and /or one or Q Z federal agencies must be submitted to the regional Office of Management and I— 0 unless fees or confidential information are included. Zj mor Budge W. < Packets that require fees or confidential information must be submitted to th Z Z resource agency with that ,requirement. M O .CC Packets that include application(s) for a project requiring approval from only on > ° State resource agency must be submitted to that State resource agency. The Annual Placer Mining Application must be submitted to the Department c Natural Resources instead of this questionnaire. If you have any questions concerning the process, please contact the Office of Managemer and Budget, Division of Governmental Coordination. If you have general questior about local, State or federal permits, both in and outside the coastal area, you may wish 1 contact the Department of Environmental Conservation Permit Information Centers in Fairbank (452- 2340), Anchorage (279 - 0254) or Juneau (465- 2615). Collect calls are accepted. IF YOUR ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS ARE AND AN AGENCY DETERMINES THAT YOU DO NEED ONE WILL NOTIFY YOU AND YOU WILL BE RESP HOWEVER, THIS WILL LIKELY CAUSE A _ AVOID THIS DELAY, WE ENCOURAGE YO ' SEEK ASSIS COMPLETING THE QUESTIONNAIRE. JUN 10 1985 NOT CORRECT AND COMPLET OF THEIR APPROVALS, THE TTAINING THAT APPROVAL OF YOUR PROJECT. T( FROM AGENCY STAFF I. * * * * * * * * * * * * * *•* * * * * * \t;3tfj Permits & Compliarc:: !'•ranch * Applicant: lwrER IV Ilt19 NM. s -P ObS MASeitiKeiatcieViier songf.1,Z,111.EL►4 Address: .0 c V) 2(,,291 .0t 4( 1444 g9,6 E Phone (day): .1 (97) &� .-4 7 g Brief descriptbn of project or activity: Address: Phone (day): � G -`t`162 (/2) t . N e'RA'J S; t.J - -hira e F1,5 Vi ! SH .0E C,,W B } C &Iere S 11 U tv 1 A2 S it • •F-1 LCD L Location of project: Twsp Rge USGS Map Is the project on: private land PART A Meridian state land Section federal land municipal land ownership not known * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Yes Nc Do you currently have any State or federal approvals /permits for this project? V Permit /Approval Type Permit /Approval # Expiration date N PD5 S WRM i L O000 —3 0c-7 -30 /s o.D c4ssog s tiff, A-V --27 f zrG . V85- Will you be placing structures, or placing fills in any of the following: tidal waters, streams, lakes, wetlands? If so, have you applied or do you intend to apply for a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permit? (Indicate below.) Have you applied or do you intend to apply for other permits from any federal agency? (Indicate below.) Agency Permit /Approval Type Date you submitted Application * * * * * * * * -'` JUN 10 198 * * * * ►n * * * * * s,e.*b__ rts` Compiiance Branch Permits Section PART 8 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 1. Is the proposed project on State -owned lands or will you need to cross State lands for access? 2. Do you plan to use any of the following State -owned resources? No V If yes, amount? a. Sand and Gravel Yes Source? b. Water Yes No If yes, amount? /Ai Kfifi 9/t 1450,c?t G: PD Source? A.100( ' - «A L S ySTT1d1 c. Timber Yes d. Other Materials Yes If yes, what material? No � r If yes, amount? \,/ (peat, building stone, etc 3. Do you plan to drill• a geothermal well? 4. Will you be exploring for or extracting coal? 0 JUN 10 1985 5. Will you be harvesting timber from 10 or more acres? Water Permit: Co^:?iiarc °r:r. :h 6. Will you be investigating or removing historic or, archeological resources on state -owned lands? IF YOU ANSWERED NO TO ALL THESE QUESTIONS, YOU DO NOT NEED APPROVAL FROM T ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (DNR) . GO TO PART C. IF YOU ANSWERED YES TO ANY OF THESE QUESTIONS, CONTACT DNR TO IDENTIFY AND OBTAIN ANY NECEOARY . APPLICATION FORMS. If you have already contacted DNR, , are you now submitting application(s) for permits or approvals? If no, indicate the reason below: a. (person contacted) told me on that no DNR approvals or permits were required for this project. b. DNR regulations have no requirement for a permit or approval. c.. Other. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PART C DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME (date) . Will you be working in a stream or lake (including in running water or on ice, within the gravel floodplain, on islands, the face of the banks; or the stream tideflats down to mean low tide)? Name of stream or lake Yes No If no go to question number 3. 2. If yes, will you be doing any of the following: a) Building a dam or river training structure? b) Using the water? c) Diverting the stream? d) Blocking or damming the stream (temporarily or permanently)? e) f) g) h) Changing the flow of the water or changing the bed? Pumping water out of the Stream or lake? Introducing silt, gravel, rock, petroleum products, debris, chemicals, or wastes of any type into the water? Using the stream as a road (even when frozen), or crossing the stream with tracked or wheeled vehicles, log- dragging or excavation equipment (backhoes, bulldozers, etc.)? i) Altering or stabilizing the banks? Mining or digging in the beds or banks? k,) Using explosives? 1) Building a bridge (including an ice bridge)? 74-TP, Yes Io- JUN 10 1985 W to Pcrrlt ; & 3 : r ch i3er;....1: m) Installing a culvert of other drainage structure? 3. Is your project located in a State Refuge or Critical Habitat? IF YOU ANSWERED NO TO ALL THESE QUESTIONS, YOU DO NOT NEED A PERMIT FROM T ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME (DFG) . GO TO PART D. IF YOU ANSWERED YES TO ANY OF THESE QUESTIONS, CONTACT THE REGIONAL HABITAT DIVISION OFFICE TO IDENTIFY AND OBTAIN ANY NECESSARY APPLICATION FORMS. If you have already contacted DFG, are you now submitting an application for permit(s) ? If no, indicate the reason below. a. (person contacted) told me on that no DFC approvals or permits were required for this project. b. DFG regulations have no requirement for a permit or approval. c. Other. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * (date) PART D DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION 1. Will a discharge of wastewater from industrial or commercial operations occur? 2. Will your project generate air emissions from the following: a) Diesel generators totaling more than 1000 hp? V Yes No b) Other fossil fuel -fired electric generator, furnace, or boiler totaling greater than 1000 hp? c) Asphalt plant? v d) Incinerator burning more than 1000 lbs. per hour I'•NI • h 'tit if,„: . e) Industrial process? Water Pcrmits Cnrnpliur -o urartelr Will a drinking water-supply be developed that serves more' finesar`' ='i°1 single - family residence? V 4 s - -Ro 4. Will you be processing seafood? 5. Will food service be provided to the public or workers? 6. Will the project result in dredging or disposal of fill in . wetlands or waterways? 7. Is on -lot sewage or greywater disposal involved or necessary? 8. Will your project result in the development of a currently unpermitted facility for the disposal of domestic or industrial solid waste? 9. Will your project require offshore drilling or vessel transport of oil, or other. petroleum products as cargo, or include onshore facilities with an effective storage capacity of greater than 10,000 barrels of such products? 10. Will your project require the application of oil or pesticides to the surface of the land? 7,7 IF YOU ANSWERED NO TO ALL THESE QUESTIONS, YOU DO NOT NEED A PERMIT OR OTHER APPROVAL FOM THE ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION (DEC). IF YOU ANSWERED YES TO ANY OF THESE QUESTIONS, CONTACT .THE DEC REGIONAL' OFFICE TOIDENTIFY-AND OBTAIN ANY NECESSARY APPLICATION FORMS. If you have already contacted the Alaska Department, of Environmental Conservation, are you now submitting an application for permit(s)? If no, indicate the reason below: a. (person contacted) told me on (date) that no DEC approvals or permits were required for this project. b. DEC regulations have no requirement for a permit or approval. c. Other. * * * * * * * * * •* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To the best of my knowledge, this information is accurate and complete. Signtea cpqa /PERMIT DhAA-clq * * * * PLEASE ATTACH YOUR PERMIT APPLICATIONS 9.c REPLY TO 417N OF: M/S 521 U.S.ENVRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 10 1200 SIXTH AVENUE SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 JAN. 2 1. 1986 CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Bill HAamoreaux, Regional Supervisor Southcentral Regional Office Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 437 E. Street - Second Floor Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Re: NPDES Permit Nos.: /51.4;e12 Dear hilartarnerearux: OFFICE OF IVIANAGEMENT & BUDGET FEB 3 - 1986 GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION AK-000043-4, Alaska Pacific Seafoods, Inc. AK-000083-3, All-Alaskan Seafoods, Inc. AK-000042-6, East Point Seafood Co. AK-000035-3, International Seafoods of Alaska, Inc. AK-000049-3, King Crab, Inc. AK-000008-6, Skookumchuck Seafoods AK-000082-5, Western Alaska Fisheries, Inc. AK-000130-9, Whitney-Fidalgo Seafoods, Inc. Enclosed for your information are copies of eight draft National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits which we propose to reissue to the referenced facilities, the public notice as it will appear in the Kodiak newspaper, and fact sheets which outline the basis for the permits. This initiates the 60-day period for state certification action as provided by 40 CFR 124.53. Final action on these permits cannot be taken until your agency has granted or denied certification under 40 CFR 124.55, or waived its right to certify. After the close of the public comment period, we will send copies of the proposed final permits for use in completing certification action. The state will be deemed to have waived its right to certify unless that right is exercised within 30 days of the receipt of the proposed final permits. Technical questions regarding the permits may be referred to Valerie Payne of our Alaska Operations Office in Anchorage at (907) 271-5083. Sincerely, Harold E. Geren, Chief Water Permits and Compliance Branch Enclosures cc: Office of Management and Budget, Anchorage United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 10 1200 Sixth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 442-1214 NOTICE OF PROPOSED REISSUANCE OF NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMITS TO DISCHARGE TO WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES, NOTICE OF STATE CERTIFICATION, and NOTICE OF STATE DETERMINATION OF CONSISTENCY WITH THE ALASKA COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Public Notice Nos.: AK-000043-4 AK-000083-3 AK-000042-6 AK-000035-3 AK-000049-3 AK-000008-6 AK-000082-5 AK-000130-9 Public Notice Issuance Date: January 31, 1986 Public Notice Expiration Date: March 3, 1986 1. Applicants The following Kodiak, Alaska seafood processors have applied for reissuance of National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits to discharge pollutants to navigable waters, pursuant to the provision of the Clean Water Act. Applicant a. Alaska Pacific Seafoods, Inc. Application No. AK-000043-4 Receiving Waters: St. Paul Harbor b. A11-Alaskan Seafoods, Inc. Star of Kodiak - Shore Plant Application No. AK-000083-3 Receiving Waters: St. Paul Harbor c. East Point Seafood Co. Application No. AK-000042-6 Receiving Waters: Near Island Channel d. International Seafoods of Alaska, Inc. Application No. AK-000035-3 Receiving Waters: St. Paul Harbor e. King Crab, Inc. Application No. AK-000049-3 Receiving Waters: St. Paul Harbor Mailing Address 627 Shelikof Avenue Kodiak, Alaska 99615 P.O. Box 646 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 P.O. Box 1637 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 P.O. Box 2997 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 P.O. Box C-70739 Seattle, Washington 98107 -2- f. SkookumchucCteafoods Application No. AK-000008-6 Receiving Waters: St. Paul Harbor g. Western Alaska Fisheries, Inc. Application No. AK-000082-5 Receiving Waters: St. Paul Harbor P.O. Box 2308 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 1111 Third Avenue, Suite 1210 Seattle, Washington 98101 h. Whitney-Fidalgo Seafoods, Inc. P.O. Box 1425 Application No. AK-000130-9 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Receiving Waters: Near Island Channel The above applicants operate shore-based seafood processing facilities. The receiving waters are classified by the Alaska State Water Quality Standards as Classes 2(A)(i)(ii)(iii), (8)(i)(ii), (C) and (D), for use in aquaculture, seafood processing and industrial water supply, contact and secondary water recreation, growth and propagation of fish, shellfish, other aquatic life, and wildlife, and harvesting for the consumption of raw mollusks or other raw aquatic life. The permits require screening of process wastewaters prior to discharge, with subsequent transport of the solid wastes to a reduction facility or a designated ocean dumping site. Fact sheets, which explain the bases for the permits, have been prepared. 2. Tentative Determination The Region 10 Office of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has tentatively determined to reissue discharge permits to the above listed applicant. 3. State Certification This Notice will also serve as Public Notice of the intent of the State of Alaska, Department of Environmental Conservation to consider certifying that the subject discharges will comply with the applicable provisions of Sections 208(e), 301, 302, 303, 306 and 307 of the Clean Water Act. The NPDES permits will not be issued until the certification requirements of Section 401 have been met. 4. State Consistency Determination This Notice will also serve as Public Notice of the intent of the State of Alaska, Office of Management and Budget, Division of Governmental Coordination, to review this action for consistency with the approved Alaska Coastal Management Program. -3- 5. Public Comments Persons wishing to comment on the tentative determinations contained in the proposed permits or wishing to request that a public hearing be held, may do so in writing, within 30 days of the date of this public notice. A request for a public hearing shall state the nature of the issues to be raised as well as the requester's name, address and telephone number. Comments must be received within this 30 day period to be considered in the formulation of final determinations regarding the application. All comments should include the name, address and telephone number of the commenter and a concise statement of the exact basis of any comment and the relevant facts upon which it is based. All written comments and requests should be submitted to EPA at the above address to the attention of the Director, Water Division M/S 521. Persons wishing to comment on State Certification should submit written comments within this 30 day period to the State of Alaska, Southcentral Regional Office, Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC), 437 E. Street, Second Floor, Anchorage, Alaska 99501. Persons wishing to comment on the State Determination of Consistency with the Alaska Coastal Management Program should submit written comments within this 30 day period, to the State of Alaska, Southcentral Regional Office, Office of . Management and Budget, Division of Governmental Coordination, 2.600 Denali Street, Suite 700, Anchorage, Alaska 99503. Comments should be addressed to the attention of Alaska Coastal Management Program Consistency Review. 6. Administrative Record The proposed NPDES permit and other related documents are on file and may be inspected and copies made in Room 10C at the above address any time between 8:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Copies and other information may be requested by writing to the EPA at the above address to the attention of the Water Permits Section M/S 521, or by calling (206) 442 -1214. This material is also available from the EPA Alaska Operations Office, Room E551, 701 C Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99513. A'copying machine is available in the Seattle office for public use at a charge of 20 cents per copy sheet. There is no charge if the total cost is less than 25 dollars. 0 73 -z uJ 0 '41( PR01%'- REPLY TO M/S 521 ATM 0. U.S. '-1.4VIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AG'EACY - REGION 10 1200 SIXTH AVENUE SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 98101 JAN 3 1 Ism CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Neil Shuckeron Vice President and General Manager International Seafoods of Alaska, Inc. P.O. Box 2997 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Re: NPDES Permit No. AK-000035-3 Dear Mr. Shuckeron: Enclosed for your information are copies of a draft National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit which we propose to reissue to the referenced facility, the public notice as it will appear in the local newspaper, and a fact sheet which outlines the bases for the permit. The Public Notice initiates a 30-day public comment period. Following the close of the public comment period, we will consider the comments received in preparation of the final permit. Technical questions regarding the permit may be referred to Valerie Payne of our Alaska Operations Office in Anchorage at (907) 271-5083. Sincerely, 244.40# Harold E. Geren, Chief Water Permits and Compliance Branch Enclosures cc: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, Anchorage Martyn Byrne, Plant Manager E. Izabela Byrne, Environmental Coordinator Fact Sheet United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 10 1200 Sixth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 442 -1214 Date: -JAN 311986 Permit No : AK- 000035 -3 PROPOSED REISSUANCE OF A NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT TO DISCHARGE POLLUTANTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT International Seafoods of Alaska, Inc. P.O. Box 2997 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 has applied for reissuance of a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit to discharge pollutants pursuant to the provisions of the Clean Water Act. This fact sheet includes (a) the tentative determination of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to reissue the permit, (b) - information on public comment, public hearing and appeal procedures, (c) the description of the current discharge, (d) a listing of tentative effluent limitations, schedules of compliance and other conditions, and (e) a detailed description of the discharge location. We call your special attention to the technical material presented in the latter part of this document. Persons wishing to comment on the tentative determinations contained in the proposed permit reissuance may do so by the expiration date of the Public Notice. All written comments should be submitted to EPA as described in the Public Comments Section of the attached Public Notice. After the expiration date of the Public Notice, the Director, Water Division, will make final determinations with respect to the permit reissuance. The tentative determinations contained in the draft permit will become final conditions if no substantive comments are received during the Public Notice period. The permit will become effective 30 days after the final determinations are made, unless a request for an evidentiary hearing is submitted within 30 days after receipt of the final determinations. • -2 The proposed NPOE'permit and other related documents are on file, may be inspected, and cop f s made in Room 10C, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101, at any time between 8:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Copies and other information may be requested by writing to EPA at the above address to the attention of the Water Permits Section M/S 521, or by calling (206) 442 -1214. This material is also available from the EPA Alaska Operations Office, Room E551, 701 C Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99513. A copying machine is available in the Seattle Office for public use at a charge of 20 cents per copy sheet. There is no charge if the total cost is less than 25 dollars. -3- Technical Information 1. Applicant A. International Seafoods of Alaska, Inc. B. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit number AK-000035-3 2. Activity Black cod,'halibut, other bottomfish, herring, salmon, and crab are processed three months out of the year. 3. Receiving Waters A. St. Paul Harbor, Alaska B. St. Paul Harbor is classified by the Alaska State Water Quality Standards as Classes (2)(A)(i)(ii)(iii), (B)(i)(ii), (C) , and (D), for use in aquaculture, seafood processing and industrial 'water supply, contact and secondary water recreation, growth and: propagation of fish, shellfish, other aquatic life, and wildlife, and harvesting for the consumption of raw mollusks or other raw aquatic life C. The Alaska State Water Quality Standards which could be affected by the discharge are dissolved gas, pH, turbidity, sediment, color, oils and grease, and residues (floating solids, debris, sludge, deposits, foam, scum). D. The Alaska State Water Quality Standards, as established in the April 1984, Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation publication for the Alaskan Water Pollution Control Program, will not be violated by the effluent discharge. This determination is based on the premise that the company will comply with the terms and limitations of the NPDES permit. 4. Background A. The original NPDES permit was issued to Pacific Pearl Seafoods, effective June 2, 1975, expiring May 31, 1980. The most recent permit became effective October 30, 1980, expiring October 30, 1985. This permit was transferred from Pacific Pearl Seafoods to International Seafoods of Alaska, Inc. effective December 19, 1983. The applicant has been operating under the terms and conditions of this permit, as allowed in 40 CFR Part 122.6. On June 10, 1985, EPA received a complete NPDES permit application from International Seafoods of Alaska, Inc. for a permit to discharge to St. Paul Harbor, Alaska. 4 B. Existing industrial treatment includes screening process wastewaters. The screened solids have been collected and transported to Kodiak Reduction, Inc. (formerly Bio—Dry, Inc.) when the facility was operating. In February 1984, the reduction facility closed, with intent to reopen following substantial reconstruction. During this period of inactivity, wastes have been barged by International Seafoods of Alaska, Inc. to a designated seafood dumping zone in Chiniak Bay (see Figure 1 of the permit). The remaining screened effluent is discharged into St. Paul Harbor. Kodiak Reduction, Inc. (now owned by the City of Kodiak) is expected to be operational in March 1986. C. Sanitary wastes are discharged to the Kodiak municipal treatment plant. D. The facility maintains one industrial outfall line, located 600 feet from shore at a depth of 42 feet below the water surface. Only screened effluent is discharged and is characterized by the following: Operation Average Flow Ice Production Fish Processing Crab Processing Defrost Wastes 10,000 gpd. 150,000 gpd 100,000 gpd 25,000 gpd Total Discharge: 285,000 gpd E. Pollutants associated with the discharge are primarily conventional and include pH, total suspended solids, and oil and grease. 5. Basis for Limitations The Clean Water Act (CWA) requires that Best Conventional Pollutant Control Technology (BCT) must be in effect no later than July 1, 1984, for all industries. For most Alaskan seafood processing, BCT is proposed equal to Best Practicable Control Technology Currently Available (BPT)(Federal Register, Oct. 29, 1982). However, since BCT is still in the proposal stage, a best professional judgement (BPJ), pursuant to Section 402(a) of the CWA, must be used in establishing effluent limitations representing BCT. For the purposes of this permit, the determination is made that the proposed BCT limitations (equal to BPT) are appropriate. -5- 6. Proposed Permit Limits, Conditions and Monitoring Requirements A. Effluent Limits 1. The proposed permit limitations and requirements do not differ significantly from those included in the most recently expired NPDES permit. A few changes concerning the different species of seafood processed have been incorporated, however, as a result of receiving updated information from the facility. 2. The permit requires that all process wastes (including plant washdown water, but excluding boiler feed water, cooling water, freshwater pressure relief, or water used to transport fish from the vessel to another facility) shall pass over a fine mesh screening system or its equivalent. Collected solids shall either be disposed of at a reduction facility, or via barging or other transport, without loss, to a seafood waste disposal zone (see Figure 1 of this permit). Liquid wastes shall be discharged through the existing outfall line. The disposal of seafood wastes in the designated seafood dumping zone is regulated under the Ocean Dumping Regulations (40 CFR 220). Additional permitting is not required under these regulations, provided the dumping does not occur in harbors or other protected or enclosed coastal waters, or any other location which may reasonably be anticipated to endanger health, the environment or ecological systems. The NPDES permit contains a provision which allows the Director to modify the location of the dumping zone or the provisions under which the wastes are dumped (i.e. mandatory grinding to 1/2 inch prior to dumping) if the wastes are creating an environmental concern, creating a nuisance, or violating state water quality standards (see Part I.A.1.g. of the permit). 3 Effluent limitations for crab salmon, bottomfish, and herring processing are from 40 CFR Part 408 - Canned and Preserved Seafood Processing Point Source Category. Limitations for frozen whole fish are based on BPJ and knowledge of the processing procedure. 4. The daily maximum and daily average effluent loading limits were calculated by multiplying the guideline effluent limits by the number of pounds of raw product(s) processed per day that produces the highest loading of pollutants. Maximum pollutant loading limits in the permit are based on processing 200,000 pounds of herring roe per day, due to the high wasteload associated with this type of processing. 6 5. The effluent limitations listed for fresh /frozen whole salmon and fresh /frozen whole bottomfish, frozen whole herring, and roe recovery are results of BPJ based on the "Summary of Effluent Limitations Changes to Draft Permits for Kodiak, Alaska Seafood Processors." 6. The basis for the effluent monitoring provision (Part I.A.1.e. of the permit) is to assure continuous compliance with effluent limitations for the duration of the permit. B. Other Requirements and Conditions 1. Included in the permit is a stipulation that a comprehensive waste treatment inspection program be developed by the permittee to ensure ongoing compliance with the permit provisions. The permittee is also required to develop a plan which describes the procedures to be followed for the disposal of seafood waste, using either by— product recovery or barging. This is necessary for monitoring good management and compliance practices. 2. The reissued permit is proposed to . be effective for five years. Permit No.: AK- 000035 -3 Application No.: AK- 000035 -3 United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 10 1200 Sixth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101 AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, (33 U.S.C. §1251 et seq.; the "Act "), International Seafoods of Alaska, Inc. is authorized to discharge from a facility located in Kodiak, Alaska to receiving waters named St. Paul Harbor in accordance with discharge point(s), effluent limitations, monitoring requirements and other conditions set forth herein. This permit shall become effective This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight, Signed this day of DRAFT Director, Water Division, Region 10 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Page 2 of 18 Permit No.: AK- 000035 -3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cover Sheet -- Issuance and Expiration Dates I. Effluent Limitations and Monitoring Requirements A. Specific Limitations and Monitoring Requirements B. Other Requirements C. Schedule of Compliance D. Definitions II. Monitoring, Recording and Reporting Requirements A. Representative Sampling B. Monitoring Procedures C. Penalties for Tampering D. Reporting of Monitoring Results E. Compliance Schedules F. Additional Monitoring by the Permittee G. Records Contents H. Retention of Records I. Twenty -four Hour Notice of Noncompliance Reporting J. Other Noncompliance Reporting K. Inspection and Entry III. Compliance Responsibilities A. Duty to Comply B. Penalties for Violations of Permit Conditions C. Need to Halt or Reduce Activity not a Defense D. Duty to Mitigate E. Proper Operation and Maintenance F. Removed Substances G. Bypass of Treatment Facilities H. Upset Conditions I. Toxic Pollutants IV. General Requirements A. Changes in Discharge of Toxic Substances B. Planned Changes C. Anticipated Noncompliance D. Permit Actions E. Duty to Reapply F. Duty to Provide Information G. Other Information H. Signatory Requirements I. Penalties for Falsification of Reports J. Availability of Reports K. Oil and Hazardous Substance Liability L. Property Rights M. Severability N. Transfers O. State Laws DRAFT • Page 3 of 18 Permit No.: AK- 000035 -3 I, EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS A. Specific-Limitations and Monitoring Requirements. 1. During the period beginning on the effective.date and- lasting. through the expiration date, the permittee is authorized to discharge process wastewater to St. Paul Harbor from outfall 001. Treatment of wastewater prior to-discharge.='shall be accomplished. through the use -of fine mesh screening (lmm) without grinding, or equivalent technology. a. Such discharges shall be limited as specified' below: Seafood Product Discharge Limitations Daily Average Daily Maximum Total Suspended- Oil & Total Oil Solids(TSS) Grease Solids(TSS) & Grease Whole Crab and Crab Sections lbs /1000 lbs raw crab 3.9 0.42. 12 1:3 Salmon — Hand Butchered including fresh /frozen whole lbs /1000 lbs raw salmon Bottomfish (Black Cod, Halibut, others) including fresh /frozen whole lbs /1000 lbs raw bottomfish 1.6 1.9 Herring — Fillets, including roe recovery lbs /1000 lbs raw herring 24 Herring — Frozen Whole lbs /1000 lbs raw herring 1.6 0.19 0.56 10 0.19 2.6 0.31 3.1 4.3 32 27 2.6 0.31 b. The total discharge from outfall 001 of TSS shall be limited to a daily average of 4,800 lbs /day and a daily maximum of 6,400 lbs /day. The total discharge of oil and grease shall be limited to a daily average of 2,000 lbs /day and a daily maximum of 5,400 lbs /day. Note: Two sets of loading limitations are applicable to the discharge. One limitation is that associated with Part I.A.1.a. of this permit and includes the pollutant discharge specifications expressed as lbs /1000 lbs for each type of seafood product. The second is the maximum allowable discharge specified in Part I.A.1.b. of this permit. The discharge of pollutants shall not exceed the more stringent of these two limitations. DRAFT Page 4 of 18 Permit No.: AK- 000035 -3 c. The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units. d. There shall be no discharge of floating solids, visible foam in other than trace amounts or oily wastes which produce a sheen on the surface of the receiving water. e. Discharges shall be monitored by the permittee as specified below: Parameter Flow TSS Oil and Grease Settleable Solids pH Quantity of Raw Product Processed in pounds for each product listed in Part I.A.1.a. Estimated Quantity of Seafood Disposed via the seafood dumping zone or at a reduction facility. Measurement Frequency Sample Type Continuously 1 /week 1 /week 1 /week 1 /week 1 /week, on day of above sampling 1 /week .110 Vte• AIM Grab Grab Grab Grab. Production shall be measured during the same period the 24 -hour composite samples are collected. The permit loading limitations, expressed in units of lbs /1000 lbs seafood, shall be calculated and reported in units of lbs /day. See sample calculations in Part I.A.3. of this permit. The Quantity of Raw Product Processed and the Estimated Quantity of Seafood Disposed shall be reported with each Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) for the period covered by such DMR. f. Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirements specified above (Part I.A.1.e.) shall be collected after treatment and prior to discharge from outfall 001. DRAFT Date g• Page 5 of 18 Permit No.: AK- 000035 -3 In the event the permittee is temporarily unable to dispose of collected seafood waste by means of by- product recovery, the permittee may dispose of said waste in the seafood dumping zone identified in Figure 1 of this permit, pursuant to the. Marine Protection Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (Public Law 92 -532). This zone is generally bordered by the Base Line to the east and the fifty (50) fathom line plotted on U.S. Coast and Geodetic. Survey Map No. 8534. The EPA and the local U.S. Coast Guard office shall be notified by telephone at least four hours prior to the occurrence of any dumping of any seafood waste. The Director may modify the location of the dumping zone or the provisions under which the wastes are dumped (i.e. mandatory grinding to 1/2 inch prior to dumping) if the wastes are creating an environmental concern, creating a nuisance or violating state water quality standards. 2. All sanitary wastes shall be discharged to the Kodiak municipal treatment facility. 3. This is a sample 'calculation of permit loading limitations for determining compliance and reporting. Given: Discharges were sampled only three days within the month of May 1985. Only crab and salmon were processed. The following table provides production data for each species processed. Pounds of Raw Product Processed to Crab Sections to Crab Meat as Salmon- Mechanized 5/01/85 20,000 15,000 5/08/85 7,000 8,000 5,000 5/15/85 3,000 2,000 5,000 5/16/85 - 5/31/85 -No discharges from facility- Calculation of Daily Maximum TSS Limitation for 5/01/85: Daily Maximum TSS Limitation - (44 lbs effluent /1000 lbs raw salmon ii, x 15,000 lbs raw salmon) + (12 lbs effluent /1000 lbs raw crab x 20,000 lbs raw crab) - 660 + 240 s 900 lbs effluent /day for 5/01/85. Calculation of Daily Average TSS Limitation for previous month: Daily Average TSS Limitation - [(3.9 lbs x 20,000 lbs) + (3.9 lbs x 7,000 lbs) + (3.9 lbs x 3,000 lbs) + (6.2 lbs x 8,000 lbs) + (6.2 lbs x 2,000 lbs) + (26 lbs x 15,000 lbs) + (26 lbs x 5,000 lbs) + (26 lbs x 5,000 lbs) - (829,000 1b1) /1,000 • 276 lbs /day 3 daysA 1/ Example of a limitation from Part I.A.1.a. 2/ This is the number of days within the month on which discharges and sampling occurred. DRAFT Page 6 of 18 Permit No.: AK- 000035 -3 B. Other Requirements. 1. Inspection Program The permittee shall develop and institute a comprehensive Inspection program, in accordance with the schedule set forth in Part I.C.1., to facilitate proper operation and maintenance of the waste disposal system, including the outfall line. 2. Waste Disposal Practices The permittee shall review, in accordance with the schedule set forth in Part I.C.1., its present waste handling techniques and identify possible areas of improvement in terms of pollution abatement. This review should include, but is not limited to, collection techniques, transport systems, use of screening systems, and an adequate description of the existing treatment system in use. A plan outlining procedures for proper alternate disposal of collected seafood waste in the event the reduction facility is unable to handle the waste solids, should also be included. The .following can be initiated to improve recovery of waste solids. a. Do not put non - contact cooling water into the waste streams b. Dry clean -up prior to plant washdown c. Water conservation techniques i. high pressure /low volume hoses ii. automatic nozzle shut -offs iii. belt conveyors /pnuematic transport vs. flumes d. Manual collection of waste solids 3. Analytical Techniques For the purposes of this permit, laboratory procedures and analytical techniques shall comply with 40 CFR 136. Any ,variation from these procedures shall receive prior written approval from EPA. All samples shall be identified and results recorded in conformance with Part I :A.1.e. 4. Harvest Reports The permittee shall submit with their monitoring report, as indicated in Part II.D., harvest records, indicating the type of end product produced (e.g. frozen sections, canned meat, frozen whole) as well as the quantity of raw seafood processed for each individual day that samples are taken for reporting. The quantity shall be expressed in pounds. DRAFT Page 7 of 18 Permit No.: AK- 000035 -3 Toxic Discharges Ail disinfectants, sanitizers, cleaning solutions, and pesticides shall be used in a way such that no discharges of toxic solutions in toxic amounts are caused. 6. Reopener Clause Upon promulgation of effluent limitation guidelines applicable to this facility the permit shall be modified, if the guidelines contain limits different from those contained in this permit. If there is evidence indicating potential or realized impacts on water quality due to the discharge of seafood processing wastes, the permit may be modified to include different effluent limitations and /or additional monitoring requirements. C. Schedule of Compliance. 1. The permittee shall achieve compliance with permit requirements in accordance with the following schedule: a. Review waste handling techniques and identify areas for improvement and alternative waste disposal methods, as specified in Part I.8.2. The permittee shall submit to EPA and the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC), a written report of this review within 30 days of permit issuance. b. Develop a comprehensive waste disposal system inspection program, as specified in Part I.B.1., within 30 days of permit issuance. c. Institute the waste disposal inspection program, as specified in Part I.3.1., within 60 days of permit issuance. 2. No later than 14 calendar days following the dates identified in the above schedule of compliance, the permittee shall submit a written notice of compliance or noncompliance. The notice shall include the cause of noncompliance, any remedial actions taken, and the probability of meeting the next scheduled requirements. The permittee shall, within 24 hours, notify EPA and.ADEC's Anchorage /Western District Office at 437 "E" Street, 2nd Floor, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, (907) 274 -2533 of any discharge of toxic substances. DRAFT Page 8 of 18 Permit No.: AK- 000035 -3 D. Definitions. 1 "Daily Average" ( "Daily Avg. ") shall mean the total units discharged during a monitoring month divided by the number of days in that period that the production or commercial facility was operating. Where less than daily sampling is required by this permit, this average shall be determined by the summation of the measured daily discharges divided by the number of days during the monitoring month when the measurements were made. 2. "Daily Maximum" ( "Daily Max. ") shall mean the maximum value attained on any day in a given monitoring month. 3. "Monitoring Month" shall mean the period consisting of the calendar weeks which end in a given calendar month. 4. A "24 -hour composite" sample shall mean a flow- proportioned mixture of not less than eight discrete aliquots. Each aliquot shall be a grab sample of not less than 100 ml and shall be collected and stored in accordance with procedures prescribed in the most recent edition of Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 5. A "Grab" sample is a single sample or measurement taken at a specific time or over as short a period of time as is feasible. 6. "Upset" means an exceptional incident in which there is unintentional and temporary noncompliance with technology -based permit effluent limitations because of factors beyond the reasonable control of the permittee. An upset does not include noncompliance to the extent caused by operational error, improperly designed treatment facilities, inadequate treatment facilities, lack of preventive maintenance, or careless or improper operation. 7. "Bypass" means the intentional diversion of waste streams from any portion of a treatment facility. 8. "Severe property damage" means substantial physical damage to property, damage to the treatment facilities which causes them to become inoperable, or substantial and permanent loss of natural resources which can reasonably be expected to occur in the absence of a bypass. Severe property damage does not mean economic loss .caused by delays in production. DRAFT Page 9 of 18 Permit No.: AK- 000035 -3 II. MONITORING, RECORDING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS A. Representative Sampling. Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirements established under Part I shall be collected from the effluent stream prior to discharge into the receiving waters. Samples and measurements shall be representative of the volume and nature of the monitored discharge. B. Monitoring Procedures,. Monitoring must be conducted according to test procedures approved under 40 CFR Part 136, unless other test procedures have been specified in this permit. C. Penalties for Tampering. The Act provides that any person who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate, any monitoring device or method required to be maintained under this permit shall, upon conviction, be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000. per violation, or by imprisonment for not more than six months per violation, or by both. D. Reporting of Monitoring Results. Monitoring results shall be summarized each month on the Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) form (EPA No. 3320 -1). The reports shall be submitted monthly and are to be postmarked by the 10th day of the following month. Legible copies of these, and all other reports, shall be signed and certified in accordance with the requirements of Part IV.H., Signatory Requirements, and submitted to the Director, Water Division and the State agency at the following addresses: original to: United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 10 1200 Sixth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101 Attn: Water Compliance Section, Mail Stop 513 copy to: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC) 437 "E" Street, Second Floor Anchorage, Alaska 99501 DRAFT Page 10 of 18 Permit No.: AK- 000035 -3 E. Compliance Schedules. Reports of compliance or noncompliance with, or any progress reports on interim and final requirements contained in any Compliance Schedule of this permit (Part I.A.) shall be submitted no later than 10 days following each schedule date. F. Additional Monitoring by the Permittee. If the permittee monitors any pollutant more frequently than required by this permit, using test procedures approved under 40 CFR 136 or as specified in this permit, the results of this monitoring shall be included in the calculation and reporting of the data submitted in the DMR. Such Increased frequency shall also be indicated. G. Records Contents. Records of monitoring information shall include: 1. The date, exact place, and time of sampling or measurements; 2. The individual(s) who performed the sampling or measurements; 3. The date(s) analyses were performed; 4. The individual(s) who performed the analyses; 5. The analytical techniques or methods used; and 6. The results of such analyses. H. Retention of Records. The permittee shall retain records of all monitoring information, Including all calibration and maintenance records and all original strip chart recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation, copies of all reports required by this permit, and records of all data used to complete the application for this permit, for a period of at least three years from the date of the sample, measurement, report or application. This period may be extended by request of the Director or ADEC at any time. Data collected on- site, copies of Discharge Monitoring Reports, and a copy of this NPDES permit must be maintained on -site during the duration of activity at the permitted location. I. Twenty -four Hour Notice of Noncompliance Reporting. 1. The following occurrences of noncompliance shall be reported by telephone within 24 hours from the time the permittee becomes aware of the circumstances: a. Any noncompliance which may endanger health or the environment; b. Any unanticipated bypass which exceeds any effluent limitation in the permit (See Part III.G., Bypass of Treatment Facilities.); c. Any upset which exceeds any effluent limitation in the permit (See Part III.H., Upset Conditions.); or d. Violation of a maximum daily discharge limitation for any of the pollutants listed in the permit to be reported within 24 hours. DRAFT Page 11 of 18 Permit No.: AK -0000 2. A written submission shall also be provided within five days of the time that the permittee becomes aware of the circumstances. The written submission shall contain: a. A description of the noncompliance and its cause; b. The period of noncompliance, including exact dates and times; c. The estimated time noncompliance is expected to continue if it has not been corrected; and d. Steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent reoccurrence of the noncompliance. The Director may waive the written report on a case -by -case basis if the oral report has been received within 24 hours by the Water Compliance Section in Seattle, Washington, by phone, (206) 442 -1213. 4. Reports shall be submitted to the addresses in Part II.D., Reporting of Monitoring Results. Other Noncompliance Reporting. Instances of noncompliance not required to be reported within 24 hours shall be reported at the time that monitoring reports for Part II.D. are submitted.. The reports shall contain the information listed in Part II.I.2. K. Inspection and.Entry. The permittee. shall allow the Director, ADEC, or an authorized representative, upon the presentation of credentials and other documents as may be required by law, to: 1. Enter upon the permittee's premises where a regulated facility or activity is located or conducted, or where records must be kept under the conditions of this permit; 2. Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the conditions of this permit; Inspect at reasonable times any facilities., equipment (including monitoring and control equipment), practices, or operations regulated or required under this permit; and 4. Sample or monitor at reasonable times, for the purpose of assuring permit compliance or as otherwise authorized by the Act, any substances or parameters at any location. DRAFT Page 12 of • 18 Permit No.: AK- 000035 -3 III. COMPLIANCE RESPONSIBILITIES A. Duty to Comply. The permittee must comply with all conditions of this permit. Any permit noncompliance constitutes a violation of the Act and is grounds for enforcement action; for permit termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification; or for denial of a permit renewal application. The permittee shall give advance notice to the Director and ADEC of any planned changes in the permitted facility or activity which may result in noncompliance with permit requirements. B. Penalties for Violations of Permit Conditions. The Act provides that any person who violates a permit condition implementing Sections 301, 302, 306, 307, 308, 318, or 405 of the Act is subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $10,000 per day of such violation. Any person who willfully or negligently violates permit conditions implementing Sections 301, 302, 306, 307, or 308 of the Act is subject to a fine of not less than $2,500, nor more than $25,000 per day of violation, or by imprisonment for not more than 1 -year, or both. Except as provided in permit conditions on Part III.G., Bypass of Treatment Facilities and Part III.H., Upset Conditions, nothing in this permit shall be construed to relieve the permittee of the civil or criminal penalties for noncompliance. C. Need to Halt or Reduce Activity not a Defense. It shall not be a defense for a permittee in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the conditions of this permit. D. Duty to Mitigate. The permittee shall take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any discharge in violation of this permit which has a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting human health or the environment. E. Proper Operation and Maintenance. The permittee shall at all times properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems of treatment and control (and related appurtenances) which are installed or used by the permittee to achieve compliance with the conditions of this permit. Proper operation and maintenance also. includes adequate laboratory controls and appropriate quality assurance procedures. This provision requires the operation of back -up or auxiliary facilities or similar systems which are installed by a permittee only when the operation is necessary to achieve compliance with the conditions of the permit. F. Removed Substances. Solids, sludges, filter backwash, or other pollutants removed in the course of treatment or control of wastewaters shall be disposed of in a manner such as to..prevent any pollutant from such materials from entering navigable waters. DRAFT Page 13 of 18 Permit No.: AK-000035-3 G. Bypass of Treatment Facilities: 1. Bypass not exceeding limitations. The permittee may allow any bypass to occur which does not cause effluent limitations to be exceeded, but only if it also is for essential maintenance to assure efficient operation. These bypasses are not subject to the provisions of paragraphs 2 and 3 of this section. 2. Notice: a. Anticipated bypass. If the permittee knows in advance of the need for a bypass, it shall submit prior notice, if possible at least 10 days before the date of the bypass. b. Unanticipated bypass. The permittee shall submit notice of an unanticipated bypass as required under Part II.I., Twenty-four Hour Reporting. 3. Prohibition of bypass. a. Bypass is prohibited and the Director or ADEC may take enforcement action against a permittee for a bypass, - unless: (1) The bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life, personal injury, or severe property damage; (2) There were no feasible alternatives to the bypass, such as the use of auxiliary treatment facilities, retention of untreated wastes, or maintenance during normal periods of equipment downtime. This condition is not satisfied if adequate back-up equipment should have been installed in the exercise of reasonable engineering judgement to prevent a bypass which occurred during normal • periods of equipment downtime or preventive maintenance; and (3) The permittee submitted notices as required under 'paragraph 2 of this section. b. The Director and ADEC may approve an anticipated bypass, after considering its adverse effects, if the Director and ADEC determine that it will meet the three conditions listed above in paragraph 3.a. of this section. DRAFT 1.7) Page 14 of 18 Permit No.: AK-000035-3 Upset Conditions. 1 Effect of an upset. An upset constitutes an affirmative defense to an action brought for noncompliance with such technology based permit effluent limitations if the requirements of paragraph 2 of this section are met. No determination made during administrative review of claims that noncompliance was caused by upset, and before an action for noncompliance, is final administrative action, subject to judicial review. 2. Conditions necessary for a demonstration of upset. A permittee who wishes to establish the affirmative defense of upset shall demonstrate, through properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs, or other relevant evidence that: a. An upset occurred and that the permittee can identify the cause(s) of the upset; b. The permitted facility was, at the time being properly operated; c. The permittee submitted notice of the upset as required under Part Twenty-four Hour Notice of Noncompliance Reporting; and d. The permittee complied with any remedial measures required under Part III.D., Duty to Mitigate. Burden of proof. In any enforcement proceeding, the permittee seeking to establish the occurrence of an upset has the burden of proof. Toxic Pollutants. The permittee shall comply with effluent standards or prohibitions established under Section 307(a) of the Act for toxic pollutants within the time provided in the regulations that establish those standards or prohibitions, even if the permit has not yet been modified to incorporate the requirement. DRAFT Page 15 of 18 Permit No.: AK- 000035 -3 IV. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS A. Changes in Discharge of Toxic Substances. Notification shall be provided to the Director and ADEC as soon as the permittee knows of, or has reason to believe: 1. That any activity has occurred or will occur which would result in the discharge, on a routine or frequent basis, of any toxic pollutant which is not limited in the permit, if that discharge will exceed the highest of the following "notification levels ": .a. One hundred micrograms per liter (100 ug /1); b. Two hundred micrograms per liter (200 ug /1) for acrolein and acrylonitrile; five hundred micrograms per liter (500 ug /1) for 2,4- dinitrophenol and for 2- methyl -4, 6- dinitrophenol; and one milligram per liter (1 mg /1) for antimony; c. Five (5) times the maximum concentration value reported for that pollutant in the permit application in accordance with 40 CFR 122.21(g)(7);'or d. The level established by the Director in accordance with 40 CFR 122.44(f). 2. That any activity has occurred or will occur which would result in any discharge, on a non - routine or infrequent basis, of a toxic pollutant which is not limited in the permit, if that.discharge will exceed the highest of the following "notification levels ": a. Five hundred micrograms per liter (500 ug /1); b. One milligram per liter.(1 mg /1) for antimony; c. Ten (10) times the maximum concentration value reported for that pollutant in the permit application in accordance with 40 CFR 122.21(g)(7); or d. The level established . by" the Director in accordance with 40 CFR 122.44(f). B. Planned Changes. The permittee shall give notice to the Director and ADEC as soon as possible of any planned physical alterations or additions to the permitted facility. Notice is required only when: 1. The alteration or addition to a permitted facility may meet one of the criteria for determining whether a facility is a new source as determined in 40 CFR 122.29(b); or 2. The alteration or addition could significantly change the nature or increase the quantity of pollutants discharged. This notification applies to pollutants which are subject neither to effluent limitations in the permit, nor,to notification requirements under Part IV.A.1. DR AFT Page 16 of 18 Permit No.: AK- 000035 -3. C. Anticipated Noncompliance. The permittee shall also give advance notice to the Director and ADEC of any planned changes in the permitted facility or activity which may result in noncompliance with permit requirements. D. Permit Actions. This permit may be modified, revoked and reissued, or terminated for cause. The filing of a request by the permlttee for a permit modification, revocation and relssuance, or termination, or a notification of planned changes or anticipated noncompliance, does not stay any permit condition. E Duty to Reapply. If the permlttee wishes to continue an activity regulated by this permit after the expiration date of this permit, the permlttee must apply for and obtain a new permit. The application should be submitted at least 180 days before the expiration date of this permit. F Duty to Provide Information. The permlttee shall furnish to the Director and ADEC, within a reasonable time, any information which the Director or ADEC may request to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and reissuing, or terminating this permit, or to determine compliance with this permit. The permlttee shall also furnish to the Director or ADEC, upon request, copies of records required to be kept by this permit. G. Other Information. When the permittee becomes aware that it failed to submit any relevant facts in a permit application, or submitted incorrect information in a permit application or any report to the Director or ADEC, it shall promptly submit such facts or information. Signatory Requirements. All applications, reports or information submitted to the Director and ADEC shall be signed and certified. 1. All permit applications shall be signed as follows: a. For a corporation: by a responsible corporate officer; b. For a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the proprietor, respectively. c. For a municipality, State, Federal, or other public agency: by either a principal executive officer or ranking elected official. 2. All reports required by the permit and other information requested by the Director or ADEC shall be signed by a person described above or by a duly authorized representative of that person. A person is a duly authorized representative only 1f: a. The authorization 1s made in writing by a person described above and submitted to the Director and ADEC, and DRAFT Page 17 of 18 Permit No.: AK- 000035 -3 b. The authorization specified either-an individual or a position having responsibility for the overall operation of the regulated facility or activity, such as the position of plant manager, operator of a well or a well field, superintendent, position of equivalent responsibility, or an individual or position having overall responsibility for environmental matters for the company. (A duly'authorized representative may thus be either a named individual or any individual occupying a named position.) 3. Changes to authorization. If an authorization under paragraph IV.H.2. is no longer accurate because a different individual or position has responsibility for the overall operation of the facility, a new authorization satisfying the requirements of paragraph IV.H.2. must be submitted to the Director and ADEC prior to or together with any reports, information, or applications to be signed by an authorized representative. 4. Certification. Any person signing a document under this section shall make the following certification: "I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervisionin accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations." Penalties for Falsification of Reports. The Act provides that any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or certification in any record or other document submitted or required to be maintained under this permit, including monitoring reports or reports of compliance or noncompliance shall, upon conviction be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000 per violation, or by imprisonment for not more than six months per violation, or by both. Availability of Reports. Except for data determined to be confidential under 40 CFR Part 2, all reports prepared in accordance with the terms of this permit shall be available for public inspection at the offices of the Director and ADEC. As required by the Act, permit applications, permits and effluent data shall not be considered confidential. DRAFT Page 18 of 18 Permit No.: AK- 000035 -3 K. 011 and Hazardous Substance Liability. Nothing in this, permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal action or relieve the permittee from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties to which the permittee is or may be subject under Section 311 of the Act. L. Property Rights. The issuance of this permit does not convey any property rights of any sort, or any exclusive privileges, nor does it authorize any injury to private property or any invasion of personal rights, nor any infringement of federal, state or local laws or regulations. M Severability. The provisions of this permit are severable, and if any provision of this permit, or the application of any provision of this permit to any circumstance, is held invalid, the application of such provision to other circumstances, and the remainder of this permit, shall not be affected thereby. N. Transfers. This permit may be automatically transferred to a new permittee if: 1. The current permittee notifies the Director at least 30 days in advance of the proposed transfer date; 2. The notice Includes a written agreement between the existing and new permittees containing a specific date for transfer of permit responsibility, coverage, and liability between them; and 3. The Director does not notify the existing permittee and the proposed new permittee of his or her intent to modify, or revoke and reissue the permit. If this notice is not received, the transfer is effective on the date specified in the agreement mentioned in paragraph 2 above. 0. State Laws. Nothing in this permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal action or relieve the permittee from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties established pursuant to any applicable state law or regulation under authority preserved by Section 510 of the Act. 143.441/. 13. 4(/ i lj • • !Ji :1I 11j'•I i i' Lo 46 1 + It • 90' ~� /1iM t q tor.• 11 • !tq •1• 'IL 11r1t �'�'./ .6 .* li! It ?P sk4-011 `s1ti •;•' 11 21 3 N 11� IF •111:• i 1 t P • 13 - F't}� it'$t• 1•. 1, 011.14.•.1 11`t1 I. ' q# 11 11 -X11 l • r. ti t 13 • l$ '• /I• .0, M . r .'1' i p� •1�111�!•.r.'•� 11►. 13 31 11 d 9. II • C91 �a 1 ( . III) . • 3• 11 •• I .�. s •' • 1.+.• IL.....il t� 1 tzt �!/ N V. II �fl', 13 It 31 • ... 11 • • :$11.4.0%11„..1-43 . ly is 33 111' t 1..!i;. C4 x/46 11•�i 6i l •s ail •'. l�- • wools 32 awe!! IS p...r 1 •�4 •l 31 31 .� + t• Flo *4.3■ $.....1`...° .ai ko ill ' 60 4 11 =;ii 1 11 ♦'� t l ` . 3�..y 1))% It r �^ 1 1! t• 4.4 r .11 11. 13 • • 1• 13l• X 34 r -V 14 .1I • t!. • 34 1014 jar ID r !i .• 11 $ • • .1: IP 13 K r.1 •l• 1• 36 1 it •1 19 14 , Vail .•t it ttt r• w3 i1 • 1$ 1 • 1I SEAFOOD 01. UHPINIC ZONE 31 H 1' 14 14 rr 93 #� 3 ( ;lG`st At•% It 1, 13 • Mi 31 I3• l• Ir • 111 Nt 1 1' 144 •4 It/ • ... /i Mi •3 N1 11 01 t• '"i' • at K 4" Ia ti 36 to 19 `,rO �1 111 / i• 31 / J 13149 It UIt 11 et 31 1 •/r 20 39% elk II j . Ar 1. ..•«�..I.114 1S 33 1• I• A1r 11 as 34 i K �d _ DIU SHEFFIE GOV'ERNOR cENTRALOFAcE POUCHAW • -110UMEAST REGIONAL OFF= 431 NORTH FRANCLIN POUCH AWARTE-101.— - - JUNEAU. ALASKA $N11016 PHONE; (907) 4W3582 • APPLICANT PROJECT TITLE: STATE I .D . TALCWADIN ----1001140ENTRAL NOD CENAU STREET ALASKA 91$104790 PteleaKon2714681 PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET -; mmumOwnemOrikomm 675-SEVENTOWNVE —STATION-A • - FOURSANKS.' ALASKA 9117014590 PHON: (907)458-3084 . • "-.1. •••• . b.... .:, 4.1. 1 • r 1 _ s. ,4 '• '2,747 __ • . . NUMBER/REVIEWING OFFICE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT. LOCATION: ELECTION DISTRICT: 7 COASTAL DISTRICTj . 7&o44 47277 X_,-(dAPPROVED PLAN _ACTIVITY TYPE: -71 FORMAT: -ES _ NO --- PENDINI /9-4-v,se-c51 6 FEDERAL APPROVALS/I.D. NUMBERS: /1./PPL-7--,c * - STATE APPROVALS/I.D. NUMBERS: - 0 REVIEWER MILESTONES (Day 1 / REVIEW SCHEDULE: 30-Day 50-Day REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BY: COMMENTS DUE BY: PROJECT STATUS N IFICATION BY: PROJECT: COORDINATOR: 4i ifg-3-- ,4 4r.c> Rev: -3-20;44 CLOSE —OUT {DATE' : • /t R - 1'• i . Li • • TYPE OF CLOSE —OUT: �.� �� � .:.:eve; ACTION :CODE t`�+a� *�% • • •• t• ,T • 4. N. t:13:�9aF� aittioo e� REVIEWER PARTICIPATION :" •DNR Y YES NO DEC / YES O DOTPF _YES ___O LOCAL -YES NO COASTAL DISTRICTS EXTENSION REQUESTED BY: DNR • DFG 'DEC - DFG YES NO • DCRA YES __NO DCLD YES NO LAW YES NO 3 YES -- NO - - COASTAL DISTRICT PUBLIC HEARING: REQUESTED HELD FORMAL INFORMATION REQUEST MADE: REVIEW COMPLETED AT: •YES 140 - YES NO APPLICANT • DGC YES O IF YES, CLOCK STOPPED REGIONAL LEVEL DIRECTOR LEVEL FOR COMMISSIONER LEVEL POLICY RENDERED BY COMMISSIONERS: MONITORING REQUIRED: 1341-ROJ /pi /PERM YES NO YES ' NO DAYS OFFICE OF TUE. GOVERNOR OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET DIVISION OF GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION SOUTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE 431 NORTH FRANKLIN POUCH AW, SUITE 101 JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811-0165 PHONE: (907) 465-3562_ Registered Mail Return Receipt Requested SOUTHCENTR AL REGIONAL OFFICE 2600 DENALI STREET SUITE 700 - - ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503-2798 PHONE: (907) 274-1581 E. Izabela Byrne „InternatiOnal-Seafoods-of-Alaskai P.O. Box 2995 Kodiak, AK 99615 Dear Ms. Byrne: nc. SUBJECT: I.S.A. Kodiak NPDES STATE I.D. NUMBER AK850612 - 12A BILL SHEFFIELD, GOVERNOR CENTRAL OFFICE POUCH AW JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811-0165 PHONE: (907) 465-3562 NORTHERN REGIONAL OFFICE 675 SEVENTH AVENUE STATION H AIRBANKS, ALASKA 99701-4596 PHONE: (907) 456-3084 July 25, 1985 The Division of Governmental Coordination (DGC) has completed -the discharge of screelfed-seafood_processing wastewater from a --'sl-Tslibrebased procet-sing facility to Kodiak_Harhoi,Alaska-.'- This conclusive consistency determination applies to the following State and federal authorizations as per 6 AAC 50: 1. Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC)- Certificate of Reasonable Assurance. 2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) - NPDES Permit. Based on our review, the Division concurs that the proposal is consistent with the Alaska Coastal Management Program provided the following stipulations are adopted. The stipulations listed below will be placed on the Certificate of Reasonable Assurance issued by the DEC (section numbers refer to those listed in the draft NPDES penult issued by EPA): 1) Part I.A.1.c. shall read as follows: The pH shall not be less than 6.5 standard units, nor greater than 8.5 standard units. DEC recommends that the monitoring frequency for pH be added to Part I.A.1.e. 01-A35LH Ms. E. Ezabela Byrne 2 July 25, 1985 I.S.A. Kodiak NPDES State I.D. No. AK850612-12A 2) Part shall include the following paragraph: Should use of this seafood dumping zone cause problems associated with beach accumulation and/or floating solids_, the Director and DEC- may require grinding of the solids to 15 inch in size prior to dumping. 3) Part I.A.B.3. shall read as follows: 4 The permittee shall notify the EPA and DEC's Anchorage/Western District office at 437 E Street, Suite 303, Anchorage, Alaska 99501 of any discharge of toxic substances within 24 hours. Part II.k. shall read as follows: The permittee shall allow the Director, DEC, or an authorized representative, upon the presentation ... 5) Part II.A. shall require the permittee to notify DEC as well as the Director of any planned changes. 6) Part-III.G.3.-a. and b. shall allowi DEC:, as wells the Darectok, to take enforcement action-for a---loypassr and approval of a bypass. - 7) Part IV.A. shall require the permittee to notify DEC, as well as the Director, of changes in the discharge of toxic substances. 8) Part IV.B. shall require the permittee to notify DEC, as the Director, of any planned changes. 9) Part IV.F. shall require the permittee to furnish DEC, as well as the Director, any information requested. These stipulations are necessary to protect water quality by preventing large fluctuations in pH, beach accumulations of waste, aid floating solids as per 10. 6AAC 80.140. The text of these standards is provided as an enclosure to this letter. If you disagree with this decision, you may appeal to the U.S. Secretary of Commerce in Washington, D.C., as provided in 15 CFR 930.125, Subpart H. Grounds for this appeal are limited to: a claim that the proposal, while inconsistent with the Alaska Coastal Management Program, is consistent with the objectives or purposes of the Federal Ms. E. Ezabela Byrne 3 July 25, 1985 I.S.A. Kodiak NPDES State I.D. No. AK850612-12A Coastal Zone Management Act, 15 U.S.C. 1451-1462, 15 CFR 930.121; or 2. a claim that the proposal is necessary in the _- interest of national security, 15 CFR 930.122. Your appeal must be filed within 30 days of your receipt of this letter. Please contact this office if you need further information about these procedures. If changes to the proposal as authorized by this finding are made during its implementation, you are required to contact this office to deteiiaine if a review-of the revision is necessary.- By a copy of this letter we are informing the EPA of our finding. Thank you for your cooperation with the Alaska Coastal Management Program. Since ely, Patty elawski Project Coordinator - Enclosure cc: Meg Hayes Department of Natural Resources Mike Lee Department of Natural Resources Bob Flint Department of Environmental Conservation Linda Freed Kodiak Island Borough Karen Tillman Environmental Protection Agency Lance Trasky Department of Fish and Game rbYliE F 11'.&S OFFICE OF °FRE GOVERNOR OFFICE:OPMANAGEMENT AND 8LIDGET DIVISION OF GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION SOUTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE 431 NORTH FRANKLIN POUCH AW, SUITE 101 --- -- - JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811-0165 PHCWE:(107)4654562 APPLICANT: • --sotin4cetrRACREGioNACOMa 2600 DENALI STREET ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503-2798 PHONE: (907) 274-1581 PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET RILL SHEFFIELD, GOVERNOR CENTRAL OFFICE , Isd tarcuei, POUCH AW lanL JUNEAU, ALOKA,0901-0, r65.1 PHONE: (907)4654,562' D — - I i 114 71985 NORTHERN REGIONALOFFFIE 675 SEVENTW.AVENUE Y FAIRBANKS; AI.ASKA 99701-4596 P LT r 4 4`. PHONE: (907) 456-3084 • , PROJECT TITLE: STATE I.D. NUMBER/REVIEWING OFFICE: AK PROJECT DESCRIPTION: S-e-e C.5C) L.9 IS .- PRdT LOCATION: 71(r, COASTAL DISTRICT:_ ACTIVITY TYPE:. FORMAT: FEDERAL APPROVALS/I.D. NUMBERS:. ELECTION DISTRICT: =2_2_ • PROVED PLAN ES- NO PENDING El°74 AIPP.61c STATE APPROVALS/I.D. NUMBERS: REVIEWER MILESTONES (Day 1 /.2 /fgS) REVIEW SCHEDULE: 30-Day 50-Day REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BY: COMMENTS DUE BY: PROJECT STATUS N /5Pg5- IFICATION BY: PROJECT:COORDINATOR: • a,Q-45,P294rs—: Rev: 3-20-84 DISTRIBUTION LIST June 12, 1985 [256] Mr. Bruce Baker, Department of Fish and Game, Juneau [1] Mr. Jay Bergstrand, Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, Anchorage [613] Ms. Judith Bittner, Department of Natural Resources, Anchorage [1028] Ms. Bonnie Borchiek,Department of Commerce and Economic Development, Juneau [3] Mr. Bob Flint, Department of Environmental Conservation, Anchorage [867] Ms. Linda Freed, Kodiak [1220] Ms. Meg Hayes, Department of Natural Resources, Anchorage [1072] Mr. Neil Johannsen, Department of Natural Resources, Anchorage [321] Mr. Tom Lawson, Department of Natural Resources, Juneau [200] Mr. Wayne Longaere, Department of Community and Regional Affairs, Juneau [4] Ms. Jan Mills, Office of Management and Budget, Juneau [287] Ms. Ione Norton, Kodiak [859] The Honorable Tom Peterson, Kodiak [1012] Mr. Jerome M. Selby, Kodiak [371] Mr. Lance Trasky, Department of Fish and Game, Anchorage [268] Mr. Jack Wick, Kodiak NIED Szo '7; Y 1200 SIXTH AVENUE a. o OFFICE OF :141 19 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 ),. 1 ' MANAGEMENT & BUDGET AIN a 6 85 .74PRot.-- JUN 1 1 1985 ■ U.S. EN■i_ONMENTAL PROTECTIORAGENCY REGION X REPLY TO AMNON M/S 521 CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Bill Lamoreaux Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation Region II 437 E. Street - Second Floor Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Re: NPDES Permit No. AK-002666-2 Inter ational Seafoods of Alaska, Inc. GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION Dear Mr_Lamoreaux: Enclosed for your information are copies of a draft National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit which we propose to issue, the public notice as it will appear in the local newspaper and a fact sheet which outlines the basis for the permit. This initiates-the 60-day period for state certification action as provided by 4Q cfg 124.53. Final action on this permit cannot be taken until your agency has grafted or denied certification under 40 CFR 124.55, or waived its right to certify. After the close of the public comment period, we will send a copy of the proposed final permit for use in completing certification action. The state will be deemed to have waived its right to certify unless that right is excercised within 30 days of the receipt of the proposed final permit. Technical questions regarding the permit may be referred to Karen Tillman at (206) 442-1669. Sincerely, Harold E. Geren, Chief Water Permits and Compliance Branch cc: Office of Management and Budget, Anchorage U.S. ENV...ONMENTAL PROTECTIOI%-, GENCY REGION X 1200 SIXTH AVENUE SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 REPLY TO MIN CO: M/S 521 AN 9 6 BO CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED E. Izabela Byrne International Seafoods of Alaska, Inc. P. 0. Box 2995 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Re: NPDES Permit No. AK-002666-2 (Shore-based Seafood Processing Facility in Kodiak, Alaska) Dear Ms. Byrne: Enclosed for your information are copies of a draft National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit which we propose to issue, the public notice as it will appear in the local newspaper and a fact sheet which outlines the basis for the permit. The Public Notice initiates a 30-day public comment period. _ Following•the close of the public comment period, we will consider the - comments received in preparation of the final permit. Technical questions regarding the permit may be referred to Karen Tillman at (206) 442-1669. Sincerely, Ag:eor Harold E. Geren, Chief Water Permits and Compliance Branch cc: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, Anchorage Permit No.: AK- 002666 -2 Application No.: AK- 002666 -Z United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 10 1200 Sixth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101 AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, (33 U.S.C. §1251 et seq; the "Act "), International Seafoods of Alaska. is authorized to discharge from a facility located in Kodiak, Alaska to receiving waters named Kodiak Harbor in accordance with discharge point(s), effluent limitations, monitoring requirements and other conditions set forth herein. This permit sha-11 become effective- _ - This - permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight, Signed-this day of DRAFT Director, Water Division, Region 10 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Page No.: 2 of 20' Permit No.: AK- 002666 -2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cover Sheet -- Issuance and Expiration Dates 1. Effluent Limitations and Monitoring Requirements A. Specific Limitations and Monitoring Requirements B. Schedule of Compliance C. Definitions D. Other Requirements II. Monitoring, Recording and Reporting Requirements A. Representative Sampling B. Monitoring Procedures C. Penalties for Tampering D. Reporting of Monitoring Results E. Compliance Schedules F. Additional Monitoring by the Permittee G. Records Contents H. Retention of Records I. Twenty -four Hour Notice of Noncompliance Reporting J. Other Noncompliance Reporting K. Inspection and Entry I1I. Compliance Responsibilities A. Duty to Comply -. - B. Penalties for Violations of Permit Conditions C. Need to Halt or Reduce Activity not a Defense D. Duty to Mitigate E. Proper Operation and Maintenance F. Removed Substances G. Bypass of Treatment Facilities H. Upset Conditions I. Toxic Pollutants IV. General Requirements A. Changes in Discharge of Toxic Substances B. Planned Changes C. Anticipated Noncompliance D. Permit Actions. E. Duty to Reapply F. Duty to Provide Information G. Other Information H. Signatory Requirements I. Penalties for. Falsification of Reports J. Availability of Reports K. Oil and Hazardous Substance Liability L. Property Rights M. Severability N. Transfers DRAFT I. Page No.: 3 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 002666 -2 EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS A. Specific Limitations and Monitoring. Requirements. 1. During the period beginning on the effective date and lasting through the expiration date, the permittee is authorized to discharge process wastewater to Kodiak Harbor, Alaska, from outfall serial number 001. Treatment of wastewaters prior to discharge shall be accomplished through use of fine mesh screening (1 mm) without grinding, or equivalent technology. a. Such discharges shall be limited as specified below: Seafood Product Salmon Hand Butchered lbs /1000 lbs .raw salmon Whole Crab and Crab Sections lbs /1000 lbs raw crab Crab Meat Discharge Limitations Daily Average Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 1.6 3.9 lbs /1000 lbs raw crab 6.2 Halibut — Mechanized lbs /1000 lbs raw halibut 1.9 Bottomfish - Mechanized, except halibut and black cod lbs /1000 lbs raw fish 8.8 Daily Maximum Oil & Total Suspended Oil & Grease Solids (TSS) Grease 0.19 2.6 0 :42_ 12_ 0.61 19 0.56 2.75 3.1 16.2 Black Cod - Mechanized lbs /1000 lbs raw black cod 8.8 11 16.2 Black Cod - Frozen Whole lbs /1000 lbs raw black cod No Discharge of TSS and Oil & Grease Herring - Fillet (including .roe recovery) lbs/1000 lbs raw herring 24 0.31 1.3 1.8 4.3 7.0 29 10 32 27 Herring - Frozen Whole • lbs /1000 lbs raw herring No Discharge of TSS and Oil & Grease b. The total discharge from.outfall 001 of TSS shall be limited to a daily average and daily maximum of 15,600 lbs /day, and 20,800 lbs /day, respectively.. The•total discharge of oil and grease shall be limited to a daily average and daily maximum of 6,500.lbs /day, and 17,550 • -lbs /day, respectively. DRAFT Page No.: 4 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 002666 -2 Note: Two sets of loading limitations are applicable to the discharge.. One limitation is that associated with Part I.A.1.a. of this permit and includes the pollutant discharge specifications expressed as lbs /1000 lbs for each type of seafood product. The second is the maximum allowable discharge specified in Part I.A.1.b. of this permit. The discharge of pollutants shall not exceed the more stringent of these two limitations. c. The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units. d. There shall be no discharge of floating solids, visible foam in other than trace amounts, or oily wastes which produce a sheen on the surface of the receiving water. e. Discharges shall be monitored by the permittee as specified below: Parameter Measurement Frequency Sample Type Flow Continuously TSS i /week Oil and Grease 1 /week Settleable Solids 7 /week pH - 1/week'- Quantity -of Raw. - -1/week, on day Product Processed in - of- above sampling pounds for each product listed in Part I.A.1.a. Estimated Quantity of 1 /week Seafood Waste Disposed via seafood dumping zone or at a reduction facility 24 -hour composite Grab 24 -hour composite Grab - Production shall be measured during the same period the 24 -hour composite samples are collected. The permit loading limitations expressed in units of lbs /1000 lbs seafood shall be calculated and reported in units of lbs /day. See sample calculations in Part I.A.3. of this permit. The Quantity of Raw Product Processed and Estimated Quantity of Seafood Disposed shall be reported with each Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) for the period covered by such DMR. f. Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirements specified above (Part I.A.1.e.) shall be collected after treatment and prior to discharge from outfall serial number 001. g. The discharge shall be in compliance,with Alaska State Water Quality Standards. DRAPJ'. Page No.: 5 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 002666 -2 h. This permit authorizes the discharges of only those waters associated with the processing of seafood at the International Seafoods of Alaska, Inc., shore -based facility located in Kodiak, Alaska. In the event the permittee is temporarily unable to dispose of collected seafood waste by means of by- product recovery or approved sanitary fill, the permitte.e may dispose of said waste in the seafood dumping zone identified in Figure 1, page 20 of this permit, pursuant to the Marine Protection Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (Public Law 92 -532). This zone is generally bordered by the Base Line to the east and the fifty (50) fathom line plotted on U.S Coast and Geodetic Survey Map No. 8534. The EPA and local U. S. Coast Guard office shall be notified by telephone at least four hours prior to the occurrence of any dumping of any seafood waste. 2. All sanitary wastes shall be discharged to the Kodiak municipal treatment facility. This is a sample calculation of permit loading limitations for determining compliance and reporting. Given: Discharges were sampled only three. days within the month -- of May. 1979. Only crab and black cod were processed. -'_The., . following_table provide "s production data for each species -- processed. Pounds of Raw Product Processed Date to Crab Sections to Crab Meat as Black Cod - Mechanized 5/01/79 20,000 -- 15,000 5/08/79 7,000 8,000 5;000 5/15/79 3,000 2,000 5,000 5/16/79 - 5/31/79 No discharges from Facility Calculation of Daily Maximum TSS Limitation for 5/1/79: Daily Maximum TSS Limitation = (16.2 lbs /1000 lbs raw Black cod'' -'x 15,000 lbs raw Black cod) + (12 lbs /1000 lbs raw Crab x 20,000 lbs raw Crab) = 243 + 240 = 483 lbs/day for 5/01/79. Calculation of the Daily Average TSS Limitation for previous month: Daily Average. TSS Limitation = ((3.9 lbs x 20,000 lbs) + (3.9 lbs x 7,000 lbs) + (3.9 lbs x 3,000 lbs) + (6.2 lbs x 8,000 lbs) + (6.2 lbs x 2,000 lbs) + (8.8 lbs x 15,000 lbs) + (8.8 lbs x 5,000 lbs) + (8.8 lbs x 5,000 lbs) = 399,000 lbs 3 days?'. 133 lbs /day. 1,000 1/ From Part I.A.1.a. 2/ This is the number of days within the month on which discharges and sampling occurred. DRAFT Page No.: 6 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 002666 -2 Schedule of Compliance. 1. The permittee shall achieve compliance with permit requirements in accordance with the following schedule: a. Review waste - handling techniques and identify areas for improvement and alternative waste - disposal methods, as specified in Part I.D.2. The permittee shall submit. to EPA and ADEC, a written report of this review within 30 days of permit issuance. b. Develop a comprehensive waste - disposal system inspection program, as specified in Part I.D.1., within 30 days of permit issuance. c. Institute the waste - disposal inspection program, as specified in Part I.D.1., within 60 days of permit issuance. 2. No later than 14 calendar days following the dates identified in the above schedule of compliance, the permittee shall' submit a written notice of compliance or non- compliance. The notice shall include the cause of non - compliance, any remedial actions taken, and the probability of meeting the next scheduled requirement. The permittee shall notify EPA -and the Department of Environmental Conservation's Anchorage /Western District Office at 437 "E" Street, Suite 200, Anchorage, Alaska 99501 (907) 274 -2533 of any discharge of toxic substances, within 24 hours. DRAFT Page No.: 7 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 002666 -2 C. Definitions. 1. ' "Daily Average" shall mean the total units discharged during a monitoring month divided by the number of days in that period that the production or commercial facility was operating. Where less than daily sampling is required by this permit, this average shall be determined by the summation of the measured daily discharges divided by the number of days during the monitoring month when the measurements were made. 2. "Daily Maximum" shall mean the maximum value attained on any day in a given monitoring month. "Monitoring Month" shall mean the period consisting of the calendar weeks which end in a given calendar month. 4. A "24 -hour composite" sample shall mean a flow - proportioned mixture of not less than 8 discrete aliquots. Each aliquot shall be a grab sample of not less than 100 ml and shall be collected and stored in accordance with procedures prescribed in the most recent edition of Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. A "Grab" sample is a single sample or measurement taken at .a specific time or over as short a period of time as is feasible. 6. . "Upset" means an exc- eptional incident - in which there -is unintentional and temporary noncompliance with technology-based permit effluent limitations because of factors beyond the reasonable control of the permittee. An upset does not include noncompliance to the extent caused by operational error, improperly designed treatment facilities, inadequate treatment facilities, lack of preventive maintenance, or careless or improper operation. 7 "Bypass" means the intentional diversion of waste streams from any portion of a. treatment facility. 8 "Severe property damage" means substantial physical damage to property, damage to the treatment facilities which causes them to become inoperable, or substantial and permanent loss of natural resources which can reasonably be.expected to occur in the absence of a bypass. Severe property damage does not mean economic loss caused by delays in production. DRAFT Page No.: 8 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 002666 -2 D. Other Requirements. 1. Inspection Program The Permittee shall develop and institute a comprehensive inspection program, in accordance with the schedule set for the in Part I.B.1., to facilitate.proper operation and maintenance of the waste disposal system, including the outfall line. 2. Waste Disposal Practices The permittee shall review, in accordance with the schedule set forth in Part I.B.1., its present waste handling techniques and identify possible areas of Improvement in terms of pollution abatement. This review should include, but is not limited to, collection techniques, transport systems, use of screening systems, and an adequate description of the existing treatment system in use. A plan outlining procedures for proper alternate disposal of collected seafood in the event the reduction facility is unable to handle the waste solids should also be included. The following can be initiated to improve recovery of waste solids: - a. Discontinue use of pre - grinders (improve screen efficiency) _ b. Do not put - non - contact cooling water int© the waste streams c. Dry clean -up prior to plant washdown d. Water conservation techniques i. high pressure /low volume hoses ii. automatic nozzle shut -offs iii. belt conveyors /pnuematic transport vs flumes e. Manual collection of waste solids Analytical Techniques For the purposes of this permit, laboratory procedures and analytical techniques shall comply with the following. Any variation from these procedures shall receive prior written approval from EPA. All samples shall be identified and results recorded in conformance with Part I.A.1.c. DRAFT Page No.: 9 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 002666 -2 a. Total Suspended Solids As specified in Part I.A.1.c., samples collected for total suspended solids analysis shall be 24 -hour composites. If the operating day is anticipated to be less than 24 hours, samples should be collected at equally spaced intervals throughout the operating day. Samples may be collected in plastic or glass containers and may be retained for a maximum of seven (7) days prior to analysis if stored in a cool environment (4 °C). Samples must be analyzed in conformance with method 160.2 for Non - Filterable Solids, as described in EPA's Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes (EPA- 600/4 -79 -020, March 1983). b. Oil and Grease As specified in Part I.A.1.c., oil and grease samples are to be collected using the grab method. Compositing may provide a more representative sample and is also acceptable. Oil and grease samples must be collected in glass containers and should not be transferred from the collection container- prior to analysis. Samples may be retained for a maximum of 24- hours_prior to analysis if stored in a cool environment (4 °C),_aci- dified to a pH of 2 or less. Test procedures for analysis of oil and grease shall conform to the Soxhlet extraction method or the Gravimetric Separatory Funnel extraction method described in EPA's Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes and Standard Methods for the Analysis of Water and Wastewater, 14th Edition. If a seafood processor desires to implement an alternative analytical test procedure (i.e. Collins /Tenny Method), the processor must submit, in writing to EPA, a request for its approval. Any such correspondence should document the rationale for the request. _ 4. Reopener Clause Upon promulgation of effluent limitation guidelines applicable . to this facility, the permit shall be modified, if the guidelines contain limits different from those contained in the permit. If there is evidence indicating potential or realized impacts on water quality due to the discharge of seafood processing wastes, the permit may be modified to include different effluent effluent limitations and /or additional- monitoring requirements. DRAFT Page No.: 10 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 002666 -2 5. Harvest Reports The permittee shall submit with his monitoring report, as indicated in Part II.D., harvest records indicating the quantity of raw seafood processed as well as the type of. end product produced (e.g. frozen sections, canned meat, frozen whole) for each individual day that samples are taken for reporting. The quantity shall be expressed in pounds. II. MONITORING, RECORDING'AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS A. Representative Sampling. Samples taken in compliance with the . monitoring requirements established under.Part I shall be collected from the effluent stream prior to discharge into the receiving waters. Samples and measurements shall be representative of the volume and nature of the monitored discharge. B. Monitoring Procedures. Monitoring must be conducted according to test procedures approved under 40 CFR Part 136, unless other test procedures have been specified in this permit. C. Penalties for Tampering. The Clean Water Act provides that any person who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate, any monitoring device or method required to be maintained under this- permit shall, upon conviction, be punished by_ _-a fans of not More than $10,000 per_violatiorr, or by imprisonment for not more than six months per_violaticn, or by both.- - -- D. Reporting of Monitoring Results. Monitoring results shall be summarized each month on the Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) form (EPA No. 3320 -1). The reports shall be submitted monthly and are to be postmarked by the 10th day of the following month. Legible copies of these, and all other reports, shall be signed and certified in accordance with the requirements of Part LV.H. Signatory Requirements, and submitted to the Director, Water Division and the State agency at the following addresses: original to: United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 10 1200 Sixth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101 Attn: Water Compliance Section, Mail Stop 513 copy to: State of Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 437 "E" Street, 2nd Floor Anchorage, Alaska 99501 DRAFT Page No.: 11 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 002666 -2 E. Compliance Schedules. Reports of compliance or noncompliance with, or any progress reports on interim and final requirements contained in any Compliance Schedule of this permit (Part I.A.) shall be submitted no_later than 10 days following each schedule date. F. Additional Monitoring by the Permittee. If the permittee monitors any pollutant more frequently than required by this ,permit, using test procedures approved under 40 CFR 136 or as specified in this permit, the results of this monitoring shall be included in the calculation and reporting of the data submitted in the DMR. Such increased frequency shall also be indicated. G. Records Contents. Records of monitoring information shall include: 1. The date, exact place, and time of sampling or measurements; 2. The individual(s) who performed the sampling or measurements; 3. The date(s) analyses were performed; 4.• The individual(s) who performed the analyses; 5. The analytical techniques or methods used; and 6. The results of such analyses. H. - Retention of Record. The permittee shall- retain records of all - monitoring information, including all calibration and maintenance records and all original strip chart recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation, copies of all reports required by this permit, and records of all data used to complete the application for this permit, for a period of at least three years from the date of the sample, measurement, report or application. This period may be extended by request of the Director at any time. Twenty -four Hour Notice of Noncompliance Reporting. 1. The following occurrences of noncompliance shall be reported by telephone within 24 hours from the time the permittee becomes aware of the circumstances: a. Any noncompliance which may endanger health or the environment; b. Any unanticipated bypass which exceeds any effluent limitation in the permit (See Part III.G. Bypass of Treatment Facilities.); c. Any upset which exceeds any effluent limitation in the permit (See Part III.H. Upset Conditions.); or Violation of a maximum daily discharge limitation for any of the pollutants listed in the permit to be reported within 24 hours. DRAFT Page No.: 12 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 002666 -2 A written submission shall also be provided within five days of the time that the permittee becomes aware of the circumstances. The written submission shall contain: a. A description of the noncompliance and its cause; b. The period of noncompliance, including exact dates and times; c. The estimated time noncompliance-is expected to continue if it has not been corrected; and d. Steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent reoccurrence of the noncompliance. The Director may waive the written report on a case -by -case basis if the oral report has been received within 24 hours by the Water Compliance Section in Seattle, Washington, by phone, (206) 442 -1213. 4. Reports shall be submitted to the addresses in Part I.D. Reporting of Monitoring Results. 3 Other Noncompliance Reporting. Instances of noncompliance not required to be reported within .24- hours shall be reported at the- - time that monitoring reports for Part IT.0. are submitted.- The - reports shall contain the information listed in Part II.I.2. K. Inspection and Entry. The permittee shall allow the Director, or an authorized representative, upon the presentation of credentials and other documents,as may be required by law, to: 1. Enter upon the permittee's premises where a regulated facility or activity is located or conducted, or where records must be kept under the conditions of this permit; 2. Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the conditions of this permit; 3. Inspect at reasonable times any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and control equipment), practices, or operations regulated or required under this permit; and 4. Sample or monitor at reasonable times, for the purpose of assuring permit compliance or as otherwise authorized by the Clean Water Act, any substances or parameters at any location. DRAFT Page No.: 13 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 002666 -2 III. COMPLIANCE RESPONSIBILITIES A. Duty to Comply. The permlttee must comply with all conditions of this permit. Any permit noncompliance constitutes a violation of the Clean Water Act and is grounds for enforcement action; for permit termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification; or for denial of a permit renewal application. The permittee shall give advance notice to. the Director of any planned changes in the permitted facility or activity which may result in noncompliance with permit requirements. B. Penalties for Violations of Permit Conditions. The Clean Water Act provides that any person who violates a permit condition implementing sections 301, 302, 306, 307, 308, 318, or 405 of the Clean Water Act is subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $10,000 per day of such violation. Any person who willfully or negligently violates permit conditions implementing sections 301, 302, 306, . 307, or 308 of the Clean Water Act is subject to a fine of not less than $2,500, nor more than $25,000 per day of violation, or by imprisonment for not more than 1 -year, or both. Except as provided in permit conditions on Part III.G. Bypass of Treatment Facilities and Part M.N. Upset Conditions, nothing in this permit shall be construed to relieve the permittee of the civil or criminal penalties for noncompliance. C. -Need to Hatt or Reduce Activity not a Defense. It shall not-be a - _defense for a permlttee in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain- compliance with the conditions of this permit. D. Duty to Mitigate. The permlttee shall take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any discharge in violation of this permit which has a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting human health or the environment. E. Proper Operation and Maintenance. The permlttee shall at all times properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems of treatment and control (and related appurtenances) which are installed or used by the permittee to achieve compliance with the conditions of this. permit. Proper operation and maintenance also includes adequate laboratory controls and appropriate quality assurance procedures. This provision requires the operation of back -up or auxiliary facilities or similar systems which are installed by a permittee only when the operation is necessary to achieve compliance with the conditions of the permit. Removed Substances. Solids, sludges, filter backwash, or other pollutants removed in the course of treatment or control of wastewaters shall be disposed of in a manner.such as to prevent any pollutant from such materials from entering navigable waters. DRAFT G. Bypass of Treatment Facilities: i. Bypass not exceeding limitations. The permittee may allow any`: bypass to occur which does not cause effluent limitations to be exceeded. but only if it also is for essential maintenance to assure efficient operation. These bypasses are not subject to the provisions of paragraphs 2 and 3 of this section. 2. Notice: a. Anticipated bypass. If the permittee knows In advance of the need for a bypass, it shall submit prior notice, if possible at least 10 days before the date of the bypass. b. Unanticipated bypass. The permittee shall submit notice of an unanticipated bypass as required under Part II.I. Twenty -four Hour Notice of Noncompliance Reporting. 3. Prohibition of bypass. a. Bypass is prohibited and the Director may take enforcement action against a permittee for a bypass, unless: (1)' The bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life, personal injury, or , severe- property damage; (2) There were no feasible alternatives. to the bypass, - such as the use of auxiliary treatment facilities-;- retention of untreated wastes, or maintenance during normal periods of equipment downtime. This condition is not satisfied if adequate back -up equipment should have been installed in the exercise of reasonable engineering judgement to prevent a bypass which occurred during normal periods of equipment downtime or preventive • maintenance; and (3) The permittee submitted notices as required under paragraph 2 of this section. b. The Director may approve an anticipated bypass, after considering its adverse effects, if the Director determines that it will meet the three conditions listed above in paragraph 3.a. of this section. DRAFT Page No.: 15 of 20 Permit No.: AK-002666-2 H. Upset Conditions. 1. Effect of, an upset. An upset constitutes an affirmative defense to an action brought for noncompliance with such technology-based permit effluent limitations if the requirements of paragraph 2 of this section are met. NO determination made during administrative review of claims that noncoMplike was caused by upset, and before an action for noncomplia:e, is final administrative action subject to judicial review. 2. Conditions necessary for a demonstration of upset. A permittee who wishes to establish the affirmative Aefense of upset shall demonstrate, through properly Signed, contemporaneous operating logs, or Other relevant evidence that: a. An upset occurred and that the permittee can identify the cause(s) of the upset; b. The permitted facility was-at the time being properly operated; c. The permittee submitted notice of the upset as required ' under Part 11.1. Twenty-four Hour Notice of-Noncompliance Reporting; and - d. The permittee-complied with-any remedial measures required under Part III.D. Duty to Mitigate. 3. Burden of proof. In any enforcement proceeding, the permittee seeking to establish the occurrence of an upset has the burden of proof. Toxic Pollutants. The permittee shall comply with effluent standards or prohibitions established under Section 307(a) of the Clean Water Act for toxic pollutants within the time provided in the regulations that establish those standards or prohibitions, even if the permit has not yet been modified bp incorporate the- reguirement. DRAFT Page No.: 16 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 002666 -2 IV. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS A. Changes in Discharge of Toxic Substances. Notification shall be provided to the Director as soon as the permittee knows of, or has reason to believe: 1. That any activity has occurred or will occur which would result in the.discharge, on a routine or frequent basis, of any toxic pollutant which is not limited in the permit, if that discharge will exceed the highest of the following "notification levels a. One hundred micrograms per liter .(100 ug /1); b. Two hundred micrograms per liter (200 ug /1) for acrolein and acrylonitrile; five hundred micrograms per liter (500 ug /1) for 2,4- dinitrophenol and for 2- methyl -4, 6- dinitrophenol; and one milligram per liter (1 mg /1) for antimony Five (5) times the maximum concentration value reported for that pollutant in the permit application in accordance with 40 CFR 122.21(g)(7); and d. The level established by the Director in accordance with - - 40 CFR 122.44(f). 2. - That any activity liras occurred or will occur which would result in any discharge, on a non- routine or infrequent basis, of a toxic pollutant which is not limited in the permit, if that discharge will exceed the highest of the following "notification levels ": a. Five hundred micrograms per liter (500 ug /1); b. One milligram per liter .(1 mg /1) for antimony; or c. Ten (10) times the maximum concentration value reported for that pollutant in the permit application in accordance with 40 CFR 122.21(g)(7). Planned Changes. The.permittee shall give notice to the Director as soon as possible of any planned physical alterations or additions-to the permitted facility. Noticeis required only when: 1. The alteration or addition to a permitted facility may meet :of the criteria for determining whether a facility is a nea source as determined in 40 CFR 122.29(b); or 2 the alteration or addition could significantly change the nature or increase the quantity of pollutants discharged. This notification applies to pollutants which are subject neither- to effluent limitations in the permit, nor to 'notification requirements under Part IV.A.1. DRAFT Page No.: 17 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 002666 -2 C. Anticipated Noncompliance. The permittee shall also give advance notice of any planned changes in the permitted facility or activity which may result in noncompliance with permit requirements. D. Permit Actions. This permit may be modified, revoked and reissued, or terminated for cause. The filing of a request by the permittee for a permit modification, revocation and reissuance, or termination, or a notification of planned changes or anticipated noncompliance, does not stay any permit condition. E. Duty to Reapply. If the permittee wishes to continue an activity regulated by this permit after the expiration date of this permit, the permittee must apply for and obtain a new permit. The application should be submitted at least 180 days before the expiration date of this permit. F: Duty to Provide Information. The permittee shall furnish to the Director, within a reasonable time, any information which the Director may request to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and reissuing, or terminating this permit, or to determine compliance with this permit. The permittee shall also furnish to the Director, upon request, copies of records required to be kept by this permit. -G. Other Information. When the permittee becomes aware that it'failed to submit any_relevant facts An a permit application, or submitted incorrect information in a permit application or any-report to the Di- rector, it shall promptly submit such facts or information. H Signatory Requirements. All applications, reports or information submitted to the Director shall be signed and certified. . 1. All permit applications shall be signed as follows: a. For a corporation: by a responsible corporate officer; b. For a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the proprietor, respectively. c. For a municipality, State, Federal, or other public agency: by either a principal executive officer or ranking elected official. 2. All reports required by the permit and other information requested by the Director shall be signed by a person described above or by a duly authorized representative of that person. A person is'a duly authorized representative only if:* a. The authorization is made in writing by a person described above and submitted to the Director. DRAFT Page No.: 18 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 002666 -2 b. The . authorization specified either an individual or a position having responsibility for the overall operation of the regulated facility or activity, such as the position of plant manager, operator of a well or a well field, superintendent, position of equivalent responsibility, or an individual or position having overall responsibility for environmental matters for the company. (A duly authorized representative may thus be either a named individual or any individual occupying a named position.) 3. Changes to authorization. If an authorization under paragraph IV.H.2. is no longer accurate because a different individual or position has responsibility for the overall operation of the facility, a new authorization satisfying the requirements of paragraph IV.H.2. must be submitted to the Director prior to or together with any reports, information, or applications to be signed by an authorized representative. 4. Certification. Any person signing a document under this section shall make the following certification: "I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction.or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and- - eValuate_the information- submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information,'the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge that belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations." I. Penalties for Falsification of Reports. The Clean Water Act • provides that any person who knowingly makes any false statement,- representation, or certification in any record or other document submitted or required -to be maintained under this permit, including monitoring reports or reports of compliance or noncompliance shall, upon conviction be punished by a fine of not more than $1.0,000 per violation, or by imprisonment. for not more than six months per violation, or by both. _ J. Avai1atl,ity of Reports. Except for data determined to be confidential under 4.0 CFR Part 2, all reports prepared in . accordance with the terms of this permit shall be available for public inspection at the offices of the State water pollution controi agency and the Director. As required by the Act, permit applications, permits and effluent data shall not be considered confidential. DRAFT Page No,: 19 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 002666 -2 K. Oil and Hazardous Substance Liability. Nothing in this permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal action or relieve the permittee from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties to which the permittee is or may be subject under Section 311 of the Act. L. Property Rights. The issuance of this permit does not convey any property rights of any sort, or any exclusive privileges, nor does it authorize any injury to private property or any invasion of personal rights, nor any infringement of Federal, State or local laws or regulations. M. Severability. The provisions of this permit are severable, and if any provision of this permit, or the application of any provision of this permit to any circumstance, is held invalid, the application of such provision to other circumstances, and the remainder of this permit, shall not be affected thereby. N. Transfers. This permit may be automatically transferred to a new permittee if: 1. The current permittee notifies the Director at least 30 days in advance of the proposed transfer date; The notice includes a written agreement between the existing and new permittees containing aspeciflc date for - transfer of - - permit responsibility, coverage, and liability between them;_ and The Director does not notify the existing permittee and the proposed new permittee of his or her intent to modify, or .revoke and reissue the permit. if this notice is not received, the transfer is effective on the date specified in the agreement mentioned in paragraph 2 above. DRAFT reLln" I'. - ,- • W1V• *OW* ••• • • ■••••*••••• ••■•••••••'^- 1,,VMWOWNO. 14:;41a 0*;!' .41.41 $1 • ' . 11 32 •••••••-• 11 I. 19 , •••• ••.,,, or ,•Iii „..,,•.„ •,• • li HI 7 ..• •• I I . is ..4.(1'' l'....:4/7'17-4.;413 12 ' -: ,,;?'47.11.1.•' e'i ":0".. IC 19 1/ • 73. 44. • Syr r.; r 11 20 /I 16 CA., Ia. le" iii . 4sec 50M.41, , 41 1‘ . 19 /9 ';',./ 9 ,':.;1•4''''. 7° • ,•• I- 1 • n csvit.....01 • 1: • •• - • , irii- .. J (0, ..1. , 1 •:. IS il ' liV1Y 1.;°•••: . 113 11/41 ' e* ...! • ,,. e ......, i• 2,..•4•2 4 :F.> ir.. is"' 1:11•.f' ::::•";"'.....:::131 11432 31;11.. 777. 4 .7.112 12 .... 3•.:11.„11.21: . 'T.:4.1*C • • •••• • : • ''. 1••• .16 : 0••• 'Is Ali si /J. 3 , ,•:.... .. ; 1, or:. . to .... 4/Fg: a 20- sto • o sa .311 ' 36 .17/ TG • .. '! .-1:cle..! 79 16 q 93 t". : • 111 ••••1 Ci.i....?" if . A Sly f• I. i•'4,1:1V 1.1:1•••••; 14 1 Os ••.',. ,..1, • t -it; , , i 10 1/ IV * • . 1 36, Lis s11 ,, 1 14 4 „ 31 " •:• "7-46 •r, „....aisiS/s9 • -,* . ,s , lc • 211,1. „ •, / ' 1 0 IFS Clos 9 e •••-'6..00.o.t...., i ; 'A ': .. .6 4 •••4 11 '. ' 12 • •• • '. " : 172 126 il 31/ 19 $ t; •-•••. •• 55 6 tO .' 3i15 1411/41:5. .„. **.•°.;r .15 0/k 2••'' ," .r...• •••„,, , ... : , ..,7 .u. ,.,.• ....., .;,,' ' )• cll.. '' ',,, ,•. • At . 5..1 •'. eii 5.lia 13 11 • 13 0 F.31..../ . 114 • 144 119 •••••• 19 9 ..1 till)) 7 '' • 27 :1 .0 :••• ... u 6 6" .. r 4.' e 11 II •.,I1,, ,,''.. ID t.; ,...1.1; • 14. .1 . I.- 12 13.i!„.-....7.1...!...,. :I -.. 14 T...• .....'....... 19 • 16 20 ' 17 $ t • ‘; 1.. $1 , ,y (0°.41 . .■ : : 94 .6 . . ? r...1.7. f ?' Z • 13 29 IT ° t '.." 16 36 7". ' . . „, II. ••• • • 11 t. .. •- ." I 1/ i ,16 • '1 .• 41..f...A . ., . • O.. 12 x.. ,.... , 11 i-s 1*. 12 1 .5.11 ';/11-ri■''; r. •11." Id 1;•' 11 !_3ir 13 15 34' • ., • • • lir . -' 1. . " ' I.... 11....4,11;.....•',F0.171;r;41 25 3 ) ili: II° 14 4.1.. 2o. Ile. „L:' 1 .. if; '•... .. 1'.!.....:*11 5 -41 a a f '161 ..°.1" 14 23 - 1215:! la 110111. P4 ' 9 '..••'4 ::i to ... Vilsiiirri,41k. 19 dy•••••••- •;,.6%...,./....; . la 25 61 5 i 4.1 :Ii • . ;X.:- .. ,...-0- .2 is . 16 / I • . . . 25 ' la 71 154.• ''•••-.$• i 1 19 ' 20 ....., • 4 •.'7 14 32 ' oki. r.r• , 10 41.9.0.• o • .31 ' • V. 35 r19. A' , ! GO /if 11 • - iN ,o. rt• 11 FS C/ • • ' ' • - /of. 4,.. 8Cit 37 131 '1 ..9 ‘U- ill IL Id.P. Si Ws , , . .7: .,..... • ••••., .cc 0,,,,„ • •41# .f 10 • . I. g .. i 2 13 • ' 15 1.4( 35 1 51 ',- SO ' 73 70 t'■/ dr ..• l•-•• • - • A 11 44 'I 5' 16 116 "24 61 1 76 .., • .%. 13 1 . rid! ?L • :4 1 \ • " It. 64 ..' ". 116 14 79 • • 12 4/ . , gr. 34 ,e 62 69 19 103 16 40.64::: .i. Al 15 * • ' • 11 13 . .. „ .7. •• • , . 13 Pj: II • 9„,." . •.1, • 1,12 ,:o i al , la i• ts13 .4 tVip, KS . ig or, 23 to 3126 36 41 20 4216 ... 19 416.38,4 el' 57 1....... •••••0t,„, II Pio *NW II S Ai:FS (; °D D6 U1' ?. 11: 1171 4G ITC 6531 , op.'s' f..47:13z /8 I • iv I 114 :717 1 ' 69 1 7 ',1 Iv 70 A 0 e ,..,.:1-.........i...7,1•4 . A) u to Dli ig isr.119 ie 2' 23 24 .................,,,• ,,,.• 1/ A or 87 16 41 .0.'33 It ; I 1 Y.:Z. 14 . '7:9: 5.1 • si --- i 1• - ii•,47 •.; s 1...?" uo .34 • 7: .87 4 A• 1 44. 8 30 311 ,:r , 0 ••••1•••••41 0 ...:1. • 1 ...e...9 26 ..." 61 I , •..o r le i :: 4 ' ; % . Ifs IC. Ili V> ill l'ji 4. flt,'";' 36 44 •01 .1: 44, ". .. Of i :. 1/ 45 .1 / ' .:.'. 13 20 •-4 of _ 0 19 la• 26 NS 31 . ...,.. , ig 73 140 .711 • 4 iek . • 40' i 1/ Si 734 • ll 1 105 /19 11 ... • *5 14.: . 104 134 U .•"1 7 CIA..° Pi . 20 As.101 • 1....-, 116 14 11 14 IS 99 62 21 41 , 23 • ?.4 64 • 1 al TERRITOV 36 50 3 SEA AI 37 19 sS ;15 .• 1Y4 TO -• . 3.1 s. 26 otgo 0. s I ' 10 10 53 01 United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 10 • 1200 Sixth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101 • (206) 442-1214 NOTICE OF PROPOSED REISSUANCE OF.A NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES),PERMIT TO 'DISCHARGE TO WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES, NOTICE OF STATE CERTIFICATION, and NOTICE OF STATE DETERMINATION OF CONSISTENCY WITH THE ALASKA COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Public Notice No.: AK-002666-2 Public Notice Issuance Date: June 14, 1985 Public Notice Expiration Date: July 15, 1985 1. Applicant E. Izabela Byrne International Seafoods of Alaska, Inc. P.O. Box 2997 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Permit No.: AK-002666-2 _ - The applicant above operates a shore-based seafood processing facility. Salmon, crab, herring, halibut, black cod, and bottomfish are-processed, with discharges to Kodiak Harbor. These waters are classified by the AlaskaState Water Quality Standards as Classes II A(i)(ii)(iii), B(i)(ii), C, and D, for use in aquaculture, seafood processing, and industrial water supply, water contact and secondary recreation, growth and propagation of fish, shellfish, aquatic life and wildlife, and harvesting for the consumption of raw mollusks or other raw aquatic life. The permit requires the screening of processing wastewaters prior to discharge, with subsequent transport of the solid wastes- to a reduction facility or a designated seafood-dumping Site. The Fact Sheet, which explains the basis for the permit, has been prepared. 2. Tentative Determination The Region 10 Office of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has tentatively determined to reissue a discharge permit to the above listed applicant. 3. State Certification This Notice will also serve as. Public Notice of the intent of the State of Alaska, Department of Environmental Conservation to consider certifying that the subject discharge will comply with the applicable provisions of Sections 208(e), 301, 302, 303, 306 and 307 of the Clean Water Act. The NPDES permit will not be issued until the certification requirements of Section 401 have been met. - 4. State Consistency Determination This Notice will also serve as Public Notice of the intent of the State of Alaska, Office of Management and Budget, Division of Governmental Coordination, to review this action for consistency with the approved Alaska Coastal Zone Management Program. 5. Public Comments Persons wishing to comment on the tentative determinations contained in the proposed permit or wishing to request, that a public hearing be held, may do so in writing, within 30 days of the date of this public notice. A request for a public hearing shall state the nature of the issues to be raised as well as the requester's name, address and telephone number. Comments must be received within this 30 day, period to be considered in the formulation of final determinations regarding the application. All comments should include the name, address and telephone number of the commenter and a concise statement of the exact basis of any comment and the relevant facts upon which it is based. All written comments and d - requests should be submitted to EPA at the above - address to the attention-of the - Director, Water Division' M/S 521'. - Persons wishing to comment on State "Certification should submit written comments within this 30 day period. to the State of Alaska, Southcentral Regional Office, Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC), 437 E. Street, Second Floor, Anchorage, Alaska 99501. Persons wishing to comment on the State Determination of Consistency with the Alaska Coastal Zone Management Program should submit written comments within this 30 day period, to the State of Alaska, Southcentral Regional Office, Office of Management and Budget, Division of Governmental Coordination, 2600 Denali Street, Suite 700, Anchorage, Alaska 99503. Comments should be addressed to the attention of Alaska Coastal Management Program Consistency Review. 6. Administrative Record The proposed NPDES permit and other related documents are on file and may be inspected and copies made in Room 10C at the above address any time between 8:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Copies and other information may be requested by writing to the EPA at the above address to the attention of the Water Permits Section M/S 521, or by calling (206) 442 -1214. This material is also available from the. EPA Alaska Operations Office, Room E535, 701 C Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99513. A copying machine is available in the Seattle office for public use at a charge of 20 cents per copy sheet. There is no charge if the total cost is less than 25 dollars. • Fact Sheet United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 10 1200 Sixth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 442-1214 Date: June 14, 1985 Permit No : AK-002666-2 PROPOSED REISSUANCE OF A NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT TO DISCHARGE POLLUTANTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT International Seafoods of Alaska,. Inc. P.O. Box 2997 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 has applied for reissuance of a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit to discharge pollutants pursuant to the provisions of the Clean Water Act. This fact sheet includes (a) the tentative determination of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to reissue the permit, (b) information on public comment, public hearing and appeal procedures, (c) the description of the current discharge, (d) a listing of tentative effluent -_ limitationsT schedules of compliance and other conditions, and (e) a- sketch or detailed descriptton-bf-the discharge location. We call your special attention to the technical material presented in the latter part of this document. Persons wishing to comment on the tentative determinations contained in the proposed permit reissuance may do so by the expiration date of the Public Notice. A11 written comments should be submitted to EPA as described in the Public Comments Section of the attached Public Notice. After the expiration date of the Public Notice, the Director, Water Division, will make final determinations with respect to the permit reissuance. The tentative determinations contained in the draft permit will become final conditions if no substantive comments are received during the Public Notice period. The permit will become effective 30 days after the final determinations are made, unless a request for an evidentiary hearing is submitted within 30 days after receipt of the final determinations. —2— The proposed NPDES permit and other related documents are on file, may be inspected, and copies made in Room 10C, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101, at any time between 8:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Copies and other information may be requested by writing to EPA at the above address to the attention of the Water Permits Section M/S 521, or by calling (206) 442 -1214. This material is also available from the EPA Alaska Operations Office, Room E535,, 701 C Street,- Anchorage, Alaska 99513 or EPA Alaska Operations Office, 3200 Hospital Drive, Suite 101, Juneau, Alaska 99801. A copying machine is available in the Seattle Office for public use at a charge of 20 cents per copy sheet. There is no charge if the total cost is less than 25 dollars. -3- Technical Information 1. Applicant A. International Seafoods of Alaska, Inc. B. National Pollutant Discharge. Elimination System (NPDES) permit number AK-002666-2. 2. Activity The shore-based facility located in Kodiak, Alaska, processes bottomfish, black cod, halibut, herring, salmon, and crab. Maximum daily production is 650,000 pounds of seafood. Receiving Waters A. Kodiak Harbor, Alaska B. Kodiak Harbor is classified by the Alaska State Water Quality Standards as Classes II A(i)(ii)(iii), B(i)(ii), C, and D, for use in aquaculture, seafood processing, and industrial water supply, water contact and secondary recreation, growth and propagation of fish, shellfish, aquatic life and wildlife, and harvesting for the consumption of raw mollusks or other raw aquatic life. C. The state water quality parameters which could be affected by the __ discharge are dissolved gas -(-biochemical oxygen-demand, chemical- -oxygen demand), pH,-turbidity, sediment, color, residues, floating solids, sludge, deposits, foam, and scum. D. The Alaska State Water Quality Standards, as established in the February 1979 ADEC publication for the Alaska Water Quality Pollution Control Program, will not be violated by the effluent discharge. This determination is based on the assumption that the company will comply with the terms and effluent limitations required in the NPDES permit. 4. Background A. The original NPDES permit was issued to International Seafoods of Alaska, Inc., effective March 27, 1980. It was modified August 2, 1982, to include effluent limitations for herring fillets and frozen whole herring. The permit expired March 27, 1985. The applicant has been operating under the terms and conditions of this permit, as allowed in 40 CFR Part 122.6. The discharge monitoring reports and periodic site inspection reports have been reviewed. During 1982, compliance violations have been noted which resulted in repairs to the facility. Subsequent inspections have reported discharges in compliance with permit specifications. -4- B. Existing industrial treatment includes screening process wastewaters. 'The screened solids have been collected and transported to Kodiak Reduction, Inc. (formerly Bio-Dry, Inc.) when the facility was operating. On February 8, 1984, the reduction facility closed, with intent to reopen following substantial reconstruction. During this period of inactivity, wastes have been barged by International Seafoods, Inc. to a designated seafood-dumping zone in Chiniak Bay (see Figure 1, page 20 of the permit). The remaining screened effluent is discharged 36 feet below the water surface into Kodiak Harbor at Near Island Channel. Kodiak Reduction, Inc. is expected to once again be accepting wastes November 1985. C. Sanitary wastes are discharged to the Kodiak City municipal treatment plant. D. The facility maintains one outfall line, #001, located 36 feet below the water surface, adjacent to the plant in Near Channel. Only screened effluent is discharged, and is characterized by the following: Operation Ice Production Fish Processing Crab Processing Defrost Waters Total 5. Basisfor Limitations Average Flow 12,000 gpd 94,000 gpd 67,000 gpd 18,000 gpd_.- 191,000 gpd A The Clean Water Act (CWA) requires that Best Conventional Pollutant Control Technology (BCT) must be in effect no later that July 1, 1984, for secondary industries which include seafood processing. For most Alaskan seafood processing, BCT is proposed equal to Best Practicable Control Technology Currently Available (BPT) (Federal Register, Oct. 29, 1982). However, since BCT is still in the proposal stage, best professional judgement, pursuant to Section 401(a) of CWA, must be used in establishing effluent limitations representing BCT. For the purposes of this permit, the determination is made that the proposed BCT limitations (equal to BPT) is appropriate. B The BPT limitations for Alaskan seafood processors are based on reasonable access of the facility to a by-product reduction plant. All seafood-processing wastes must be collected without prior grinding via fine-mesh screening (lmm), or an equivalent technology, to achieve the limitations set forth in 40 CFR Part 408. Seafood wastes must be disposed of by either barging to the designated seafood-dumping zone, or through by-product recovery. • 1 -5- 6. Proposed Permit Limits, Conditions, and Monitoring Requirements A. Effluent Limits 1. The proposed permit limitations and requirements do not differ significantly from those included in the most recently expired - NPDES permit. A few changes concerning the different species of seafood processed have been incorporated, however, as a result of receiving updated information from the facility. 2. The permit requires that all process wastes (including plant wash-down water but excluding boiler-feed water, cooling water, freshwater pressure relief, or water used to transport fish from the vessel to another facility) shall pass over a fine mesh screening system or its equivalent. Collected solids shall either be disposed of at a reduction facility, or via barging or other transport, without loss, to a seafood waste disposal zone (see Figure 1, page 20 of the permit), Liquid wastes shall be discharged through the existing outfall line. The disposal of seafood wastes in the designated zone is regulated under the Ocean Dumping Act 40 CFR 220. Additional permitting is not required under this act, provided that the discharge is not into a harbor or other protected or enclosed coastal water, or that might otherwise be reasonably expected to endanger health, the environment, or other ecological systems. The NPDES_permit contains a provision which allows-the Administrator to modify the dumping zone_or_the provisionsiunder which. the wastes are dumped (i.e, such as mandatory grinding to 1/2 inch prior to dumping) if thi wastes are creating an environmental concern, creating a nuisance, or violating state water quality standards (see Part 1.0.5. of the permit). 3 The bottomfish subcategory (40 CFR 408.200) has been interpreted as applying exclusively to halibut. For this reason, limitations pertaining to the processing discharges of-other bottomfish, excluding halibut and black cod, have been proposed. Robert Stamnes of EPA, in a memo revising the NPDES permit format for seafood processors (Attachment A), presented these limitations, and substantiated them with a statement entitled "Basis for Non-remote Alaskan Bottomfish Effluent Limitations" (Attachment B). As a result of best professional judgement, these limitations have been incorporated into the permit requirements for Pacific cod and pollock process effluent (Part I.A.1.a. of the permit). Effluent limitations for the salmon subcategory are from 40 CFR 408.172. 4. Maximum allowable pollutant discharges (Part I.A.1.b. of the permit) are based on unit productivity (lbs allowable effluent/lbs raw material). Using values for daily production (650,000 lbs/day) and maximum quantities of pollutants expected from this production (limitations for salmon processing, were used as a worst case), pollutant effluent loading limitations were calculated. a -6- 5. The basis for the effluent monitoring provisions (Part I.A.2. of the permit) is to assure continuous compliance with promulgated effluent limitations for the duration of the permit. . ,Other Requirements The permittee is required . to develop and submit a plan which describes the procedures to be followed in the disposal of seafood wastes, using either by- product recovery or barging. This is necessary for monitoring good management and compliance practices. WAR DEPARTMENT • NoTF--It is to be understood that this instrument does not give any property rights either in real estate or mate- rial, or any exclusive privileges; and that it does not authorize any injury to private property or invasion of private rights, or any infringement of Federal, State, or local laws or regulations, nor does it obviate the necessity of obtain- ing State assent to the work authorized. IT MERELY EXPRESSES THE ASSENT OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SO FAR AS CONCERNS THE PUBLIC RIGHTS OF NAVIGATION. (See Cummings v. Chicago, 188 U. S. 410.) APPROVAL OF PLANS Alaska h#000400/04 Ancnoragat jlkj,it, , 1902 Waiter & Mildred. Muller Kdiik9 Alaska • Dear Sir & :Madam: Referring to written request dated 16 June approval'of the attached plans of cannery and dock (Describe structure or work) for the ..... ich has been or is being constructed in Kodiak Harbor (Name waterway) .at *laska am, . (Give definite location with respect to well-known locality) ------ - I have to inform you that, upon the recommendation of the Chief of Engineers, and under the provisions of Section 10 of the Act of Congress approved March 3, 1899, entitled "An act making appropriations for the construction, repair, and preservation of certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for otherpur- poses,° said plans are approved by the Secretary of War, subject to the follow- ing conditions: ^ ...... N • • ...... f • 1. That no attempt sh ... lade by the occupant or the owner bid the full and free use by the public of all navigab ..___ers at or adjacent to the said struc 2. That if future operations by the United States ,require an alteration in the position of the structure herein approved, or if in the opinion of the Secretary of War, it shall cause unreasonable obstruction to the free navigation of said water, the owner will be required upon due notice from the Secretary of War to remove or alter the structure or obstruction caused thereby without expense to the United States so as to render navigation reasonably free, easy, and unobstructed. No claim shall be made against the United States on account of any such removal or alteration. 3. That if the display of lights and signals on the structure hereby approved is not otherwise provided for by law, such lights and signals as may be prescribed by the United States Coast Guard shall be installed and maintained by and at the expense of the owner. 4. That the approval herein given shall not impose any liability upon the United States for any damage or injury to the structure which may be caused by or result from future operations undertaken by the United States for the conservation. or improvement of navigation, or for other purposes, and no claim or right to compensation shall accrue from any such damage. authority of the Secretary of War: trims "War Departmar:" id "Secretary at War" as i!d i n th a lr,at :meit shall mar, "Departms :f Army" 'r4s, "Setreory c: the Army,' r:,:zect;vely, (Sec. 205 e( th, .t•t100.31 cf 1947 acr,r.aved 26 July 1447, Pub;i: ' —s• • Form No. 960 WAR DEPARTMENT ENGINEERS (Revised ..Tan..4, 1940) • II • Colo Distric U. S. GOVCROMEMT PRINTING OFFICE 19-1119.2 CE Engineer • 1111 : 10. I 111 ;1! Li ill :I•ii 1 I 121211111011ir 2 2 '111411111"L' LOT 18 LOT 17 LOT 16 1 'L !Jii11 • L. ERY 'AND DOCK • 0 • ;.! • • t..; • : : • f FENDER PILES fa. 43 A NEAR ISLAND N57°47'15"4 MILE SCALE 1110,000 . . VICLNITY Mit . • - FROM U. . C. esti,G.S.; CR , T. NO.85,45 ' ..0.9 43 (1" , , , 4343' to i, • ' 1 - , , . . 4) Di 4, .i...:•fl.,- 42. ' :') ":. • ::-. :. ! ' ""...-....„, 4) , 4 : : ...... "1/4• Co ■tv . \ '‘ • .0„• ' . q. ..• .). q, 67 ■3' / . nO A 41i €1. . xv• 0 7 bills , 1 . 0 q' t • 43. , 43 / tIe 0 '6 A. v% 4) 43 7 KODIAK ELEC. ASSN... - cr GENERATOR BLDG.'" " , . 03 N.• •‘. b., , Ot „q r 7 . tikv. 63 7. 0 ta 0' a 0 .......""" ' 13 Cr ,i ........." a 1, ta . . k4 ttl'.....7‘ • . : 43 41/ 7 0' ' . t" 00 7 , ' • PLOT PLAN i': (!. :: Scale: lin. = 100 ft. ' A.43 tA *), 41, 04. N E A R .. Notes: 100 . 50 i00 . Soundings and Elevations are in feet and refer to Mean Lower Low Water. . 2. Soundings and Channel Limits are from Corps of Engineers"Condition , Survey of June 1948"- File No. Q - 5-3 -26,except as noted. ' 3. Property lines' and horizontal data determined by field survey with reference to Plat of Kodiak Townsite - U.S. Survey No. 2537' B. 4. Relationship of Survey No.2537B to Ale No.0-5-3-26 determined from location of S.E.Cor. of Kodiak Electric Ass'n, Generator Bldg. Tidal Data: M.H.H.W. = +8.5. • M.L.W. = +1.0 Highest Tide = +13.0 M. H.W. = 4- 7.6 = • 0,0 Lowest. Tide - 4.0 200 .ISLAND 300 400 „ EXISTING CANNERY & PROPOSED DOCK . AT: Kodiak, Alaska , APPLICATION BY , • 4ALTER & MILDRED MULLER . JUNE 16, 1952 SH'EET NQ.I 2.$HEET$ FENDER PILES 1111fljfiljil 111 • .111111111: :0•1 ,r • e ;HO k ; 1111.flitid111. • 111 Out) CREOSOTE • • ; • 23-BENTS AT 101-0' C.C. 3' X B" CROSS BRACING-BOTH WAYS FOUNDATION 'PLAN 34'X34' • COLD STORAGE 20•X 20' ICE HOUSE , 20'X 24' STEAM ROOM 401X 82' MAIN. CANNERY LOT: .1 0 il1:111111[1.111 0 I!? ..A •■ 40X82' SECOND FLOO R • STORAGE PLAN - AIR . VIEW) 2"X Oft STUDS.13X8"SHIPLAP AND TRANSITE slow; , . „ 2 DECKING BULLRAIL ' TOP OF DECK ELE=5 11.11 ; M.L.L.M.. 0. , 10 FENDER PILES • • TAGURA IOTIXIO"CAPS ' • 2"X12" STRINGERS-16"0z. OHO CREOSOTE PILES EAST, ELEVATION . II-. 0 0 111111111" '+` ;I DECK-EL.15.5 M.H:H.W= 8.5 SOUTH ELEVATION • (11 '** 0 . n • 00 SCALE11 ;50 EXISTING:CANERY' PROPO8'ED. DOCK' . AT: Kodialc Akiska APPLICATION BY:. WALTER.:01 MILDRED MULLER JUN.E. 1E1-1952 SHEino.2: • j • 1 XOTEnl L110ILL s 1F n100S, 1 e. 0o01Ak, 010504 001 000 1001 000upancy elesoitteatlon. 0 -4 Pr3p0000 Construction Typal Typo Vol Pour, Sprinkle a0. ella0ablo area Calculation, keel* t0aaAllowable 0 0 a }, (Teel* 2-k) 2a *040, Sap 0021e), Sprinkler 011E 01000 1.0,011 000 900(0). 102 000,1.4 CAM 20}501 Actual Areas, nlatln0 Pleat Floor (000*90lnt) 020302ed Addition Footprint Tonsil 8r1,t1n1 5.2002 stow 32,000 0.7. 14,00918.0. 38 14,030 8.0. 2,140 0.1. 14,990 8.2. 13,010 B.F. 31,100 8.0. 0 ■ X10 QR ©ACT : Cr Y:LIPALIC4 7--(PE: Sts-/.1c, 20LIE SRztN 1.ED : A�59°p"E /33.27+ �! EA /SL+sah /b CNSbvi.JtL /%lu 066StnakirMS SITZUG-Nlaol_ : F ,ATa/lchi, j jo-rrrlJ6) -1oM ! 0' El�nlJtEWN6 C72441-1: . h* /1Ez/.)r4--na. 4L 4 =r ac 4L skt- /A.C. P fox 2997 ftODJA, 4LA -4 996/6 ( .. —,LE E*-3 ! p�sRl Pl�o4� ED,ISI1J6 el/U-1)046 r PROP -( LioE PLOT PLAN ow7P AA2V91 Dxk EAlc St.)RE PLAQS F JTE 5.*iTakt SfnsoP 0- A-1