Loading...
BELLS FLATS TR A BK 3 ALL - Code Enforcement (3)17\ 71 F117 1/( r DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION DIVISION OF AIR AND WATER QUALITY Mr. George H. Cline Soil Processing Incorporated 207 E Northern Lights Blvd., Suite 103 Anchorage, AK 99503 Dear. Mr, Cline: March 17, 2003 FRANK MURKOWSKI, GOVERNOR 610 University Avenue Fairbanks, AK 99709-3643 Director's Office:(907) 269-7686 Fairbanks Office: (907) 451-2360 Fax: (907) 451-2187 http://www.state.ak.usidec/ I am responding to your March 17, 2003 verbal request seeking confirmation that our November 13, 2002 letter is still valid. The November 13, 2002 letter indicated that the department had accepted the result of your latest source test and that you were able to operate under the terms of General Permit 4. I have reviewed this letter and find it is still valid. Please contact Beverely Williams at (907) 269-7574 if you have any questions concerning this matter. Sincerely, fV/t ,t-f//10-2-- Robert P. Cannone Air Permit Compliance Supervisor cc: Kodiak Borough, 710 Mill Bay Rd. Kodiak AK 99615 Bev Williams, ADEC/APP/Compliance/ Anchorage 900.16.082 Clean Air, Clean Water LOPMENT DEPARTIVin DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION DIVISION OF AIR AND WATER QUALITY J November 13, 2002 Jennie D. Sharpe, CEO Soil Processing, Inc. 207 E. Northern Lights Blvd., Suite 103A Anchorage, Alaska 99503 TONY KNOWLES, GOVERNOR 610 University Avenue Fairbanks, AK 99709 -3643 Director's Office:(907) 269 -7686 Fairbanks Office: (907) 451 -2360 Fax: (907) 451-2187 http: //www.state.ak.us /dec/ Re: Soil Processing, Inc.'s soil remediation unit — recent emission source test. Ms. Sharpe: The Department of Environmental Conservation accepts the results of the most recent emission source test conducted on Soil Processing Inc.'s soil remediation unit. The facility passed the emission test and is authorized to operate under terms of Permit AP000204 (GP4 — Soil Remediation Unit General Permit). Facility: Soil Processing Inc. Permit #: AP000204 (General Permit #4) Test Date: 11/9/02 — 11/10/02 Test Location: Kodiak Witnessed By: Matt Wilkinson/ADEC Results: 0.027 gr /dscf Standard: <= 0.05 gr /dscf If you have any questions concerning this letter, please feel free to contact Matt Wilkinson in Fairbanks at (907) 451 -5172 or Beverley Williams in Anchorage at (907) 269 -7574. Sincerely, 66-7 62/1-ici.10---'t- Robert P. Cannone Air Permits Compliance Supervisor cc: Kodiak Borough G:\AWQ\Awq - Permits \AIRFACS \Soil Processing Inc \Compliance \Source Test Ltr.doc Clean ,fir, Clean Water 02/27/03 16:43 FAX 269 7508 Air and Water Quality SIIVE OF Lan DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONS) oi Post-it° Fax Note,- •- 7671 Date 7/j I 21 a. IpUles It' . To . From Fet) Co/Dept. tra.14.14-.... ..- • • D06— Phone 4.. Phone 0 us) .0 4.4.tivi Fax # .? ' i Fax # . Geo* 7 •-• DIVISION OF" AIR AND WATER QUALITY AIR PERMITS PROGRAM February 20, 2003 Mr. Bill Oliver Brechan Enterprises Inc. 2705 Mill Bay Rd Kodiak, AK 99615 Dear. Mr. Oliver: FAX: (907) 465-5129 . http://www.state.ali.usided I am writing to you to close our investigation of air quality concerns regarding your facility. • As you know, our December 11, 2002 ambient air modeling indicated a possible concern with the sulfur dioxide impact from•your facility, based on worst-case assumptions. We have revisited our analysis to replace our assumptions with figures more representative of your actual operations. I have attached a copy of the modeling results. Our analysiS predicts that your facility will comply with the sulfur dioxide standards if you operate less than 13 hours:per day and your fuel contains 0.4 percent or less sulfur by weight. We understand that you currently operate less than 13 hours per day and plan. to use fuel containing 0.4 percent sulfur by weight or less. As long as these facts hold true and you comply with your air permit, we have no ambient air quality concerns about your operations. We will continue to monitor your facility's operation as part of our normal inspection and compliance assurance program. We appreciate your cooperation in addressing this issue. Sincerely, John Kuterbach Program Manager Attachment cc: Tom Chapple, ADEC/AWQ/DIR, Anchorage, AK. Beverly Williams, ADEC/AWQ/APP, Anchorage, AK Bob Cannone, AWQ/A.WQ/APP, Fairbanks, AK GAAWQ\Awq-Permits1AIRFACS\Brechan\CompliancekBrechan 2-19-03.doc - Clean Air, Clean Water 3 Printed on Recycled Pnper 02/27/03 14:40 FAX 9074512187 ADEC AWQ FBKS Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Air and Water Quality 610 University Avenue Fairbanks, A.L( 99709 -3643 Fax (907) 451 -21$7 FAX COVER SIIEET Date: ? & To: [a001 Fax Number: D 7 r 9,3 '?€ Company: From: Phone Number: Number of pages: including this cover sheet Comments: 01046--3 wee & 7 a.,ilG1 CA4*JS 02/27/03 14:40 FAX 9074512187 ADEC AWQ FBKS A -------- ----- DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION DIVISION OF AIR AND WATER QUALITY AIR PERMITS PROGRAM February 20, 2003 Mr. Bill Oliver Brechan Enterprises Inc. 2705 Mill 33ay Rd Kodiak, AK 99615 a 002 FRANK H. MURKOWSKI, GOVERNOR 410 Willoughby Ave., Ste 303 Juneau, Al. 992.01-1195 (9071 465-5100 TAX: (90'7) 465-5129 lutp://www.state.alc.usidect RECEIVED FEB 2 2003 DEPT, Of eviRommENTAL CONSERVATION Dear Mr. Oliver: I am writing to you to dose our investigation of air quality concerns regarding your facility. As you know, our December 11, 2002 ambient air modeling indicated a possible concern with the sulfur dioxide impacts from your facility, based on worst-case assumptions. We have revisited our analysis to replace our assumptions with figures more representative of your actual operations. I have artached a copy of the modeling results. Our analysis predicts that your facility will comply with the sulfur dioxide standards if you operate less than 13 hours per day and your fuel contains 0.4 percent or less sulfur by weight. We understand that you currently operate less than 13 hours per day and plan to use fuel containing 0.4 percent sulfur by weight or less. As long as these facts hold true and you comply with your air pemiit, we have no ambient air quality concerns about your operations_ We will continue to monitor your facility's operation as part of our normal inspection and compliance assurance program. We appreciate your cooperation in addressing this issue. Attachment Sincerely, 7-1 John Kuterbach Program Manager cc: Tom Chapple, ADEC/AWQ/DIR, Anchorage, AK I3everly Williams, ADEC/AWQ/APP, Anchora.ge, AK Bob Cannone, AWQ/AWQ/APP, Fairbanks, AK GAAWQ1A.wq-Pennits\AIRFACS \Brechan\Compliance\Brechan 2-19.03.doc Clean A. Clean Water r:rivezd .71 itzk: 02/27/03 14:40 FAX 9074512187 Attachment ADEC AIM FM A U1003 From: Walker, Bill Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 1:44 PM To: Cannon?, Bob Cc: Kuterbach, John; Kajdan, John Subject: Remodeling for the Brechan 201 investigation Bob I reran John Kajdan's modeling for the Brechan asphalt plant with the. new information to represent typical operation. The parameters I changed were SO2 emission rates and vertical velocities for both the old dryer and the new drum mixer. I excluded the third source John modeled, the SPI dirt burner, because they reportedly bum propane, and sulfur emissions would essentially be zero. Based on a conversation with Bill Oliver, I assumed that the Cedar Rapids dryer is operated at 27.5% of the rated capacity of 70.4 MMBtu/hr. (Bob Hales told Mr. Oliver that operation is 25 to 30% of rated capacity.) From This I calculated that the dryer burns 144 gallons of fuel per hour. I allocated the remainder of the 300 gallons per hour from the plant, 156 gallons, to the drum mixer. I assumed 0.5% sulfur to calculate the SO2 emission rates. The source test report says that the mixer was operating at 180 tons per hour during the test. Based on the activity rates for the season, the average production Is 152 tons per hour. So far the modeling, I reduced the vertical stack velocity given in the source test report by a factor of 152/180 to represent normal operation_ 1 did this for both units. Predicted concentrations exceeded both the 3-hour and the 24-hour ambient air quality standards_ All ambient locations with modeled concentrations above the standards were along the public road adjacent to the plant_ For background concentrations I used 26 ug/m3 for the 24-hour standard and 44 for the three hour standard. I discuss the reasoning for that below. I subtracted the background concentrations from the three hour standard to get the allowable concentration that could be attributable to the plant, then calculated what fuel sulfur would bring the maximum modeled concentrations down to the allowable limit. Using the calculated fuel sulfur allowed by the 3-hour limit, I then calculated the number of hours the sources could operate per clay and still comply with the 24-hour ambient standard. See the table below. All concentrations are in ug/m3. In using the modeling files there are two things 1 would change if starting from scratch. First, the • Assume background is h same as Healy 3 hr - 44 24 hour - 26 ug/m3 Allowable = Allowable = Maximum ambient Maximum ambient 1256 339 Concentration Concentration 3 hour 3 hour 24 hour 24 hour concentration Allowable hours per da Year @ 0.5% sulfur Allowable % sulfa @ 0.5% sulfur @ 0.4% sulfur @ 0.4% sulfur 90 1468 0.428 771 616.8 13.19066148 91 1563 0.402 657 525.6 15.47945205 92 1456 0.432 764 611.2 1524 0.412 578 462.4 17.59515571 95 1576 0.398 517.6 15.7187017 hours per day All year modeled from Marohthrough October allowable at OA% sulfur In using the modeling files there are two things 1 would change if starting from scratch. First, the 02/27/03 14:41 FAX 9074512187 ADEC AWQ FBKS A a 004 downwash structure used for the modeling represents only the drum mixer ittelf, It does not represent the baghouse or the storage silo. both of which are much larger and appear to be within distances that would influence downwash. Second, all of the receptors are set at a terrain height of one meter. But all of the nearby houses are on elevated terrain. We have very limited data in this state for background concentration. There is none from Kodiak. But we cannot use zero_ There are data sets from Healy, the North Slope, Nikiski near the refinery, and Beluga on the west side of the Cook Inlet. I chase the data from Healy. The North Slope is the farthest away. The Nlikiski data appears to include a large component from the refinery. The Healy monitoring site selection was intended to represent background, not be a measure of the impact of the Healy power plants. I chose it rather than the lower concentrations from Beluga, the only remaining site because of the uncertainty from the minimal downwash structures used in the modeling and from elevated terrain not being evaluated. Analytica Alaska Incorporated website: www.analyticagroup.com ANALYTICA Environmental Laboratories 1/17/2003 Alaska Dept of Environmental Conservation 555 Cordova Street Anchorage, AK 99501 Attn: Al Kukla Lab Sample Number Sample Identification Client Description A0212038 -01 Work Order #: A0212038 Date: 1/17/2003 Work ID: Woners Bay Water Sample Date Received: 12/12/2002 Lab Sample Number Client Description #3 Brenham Pond (Baggy) A0212038 -02 #2 Russ Creek Pond Enclosed are the analytical results for the submitted sample(s). Please review the CASE NARRATIVE for a discussion of any data and /or quality control issues. Listings of data qualifiers, analytical codes, key dates, and QC relationships are provided at the end of the report. Sincerely, Jason Gray Project Manager "The Science of Analysis, The Art of Service" Case Narrative Analytica Alaska Inc. Work Order: A0212038 Samples were prepared and analyzed according to EPA methods in the following reference: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, USEPA SW-846, Third Ed.,Rev. 4,Dec. 1996. „ REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ANALYTICA QA PLAN A summary of our review is shown below, organized by test: SAMPLE RECEIPT: There were 3 samples received at Analytica-Anchorage on 12/12/2002. Samples were received at a temperature of 5.4°C in one cooler. Problem with Custody Seals Problem with container type Problem with preservation Problem with volume Comments: Al Kukla was contacted with telephone by Tim Dean about water samples. The correct sample bottles and preservative was not used. Also, there was not enough matrix provided to run the 310.1. David Wetzel had several conversations with Al Kukla, and decided to analyze the samples by filtration though a 0.45 micron filter and subsequent acid digestion of the combined filter and solids retained on the filter. A plain filter was also digested and is listed in this report as the method blank/filter blank; in order to obtain an approximate metals concentration for each individual sample, one must subtract the level in the blank/plain filter from the sample result to arrive at a final number. Samples were received at Analytica-Juneau for analysis in two separate coolers at temperature of 4.7°C, on 12/13/2002 and 3.6°C on 12/18/200,. „ , , At the time of sample receipt, only the samples labeled as Russ Crk Pond and Breehan Pond (Baggy) had sufficient sample volume for analysis. REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ANALYTICA QA PLAN A summary of our review is shown below, organized by test: Test Method: SW6020 ICPMS Total -Solids Many of the quality control parameters for laboratory control standards are out of range for this analysis, but this is primarily due to the unconventional nature of the sample preparation and possible variability in the levels of metals in individual filters. Detailed Analytical Report Workorder (SDG): A0212038 Project: Client: Client Project Number: Report Section: Client Sample Name: Matrix: Analytica Alaska Inc. Woners Bay Water Sample Alaska Dept of Environmental Conservation Kodiak Island Bourough Client Sample Report #3 Breeham Pond (Baggy) Sediment Collection Date: 11/30/2002 2:55:OOPM Lab Sample Number: Prep Date: Analytical Method ID: Prep Method ID: Prep Batch Number: Report Basis: Sample prep wt. /vol: Analyte Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc A0212038 -01A Analysis Date: 12/20/2002 Instrument: SW6020 - ICPMS - ICPMS Total File Name: 3050_ICP Dilution Factor: J021230010 As Received 0.10- g CASNo Result Flags Units POL MDL 7429 =90 -5 32,600 mg/Kg 25 1.7 7440 -36 -0 9.71 mg/Kg 2.5 0.15 7440 -38 -2 128 mg/Kg 7.5 0.70 7440 -39 -3 269 mg/Kg 1.3 0.32 7440 -41 -7 0.566 J mg/Kg 1.5 0.50 7440 -43 -9 11.0 mg/Kg 1.0 0.31 7440 -70 -2 14,200 mg/Kg 500 100 7440 -47 -3 48.5 mg/Kg 7.5 2.5 7440 -48-4 28.7 mg/Kg 0.50 0.15 7440 -50 -8 106 mg/Kg 2.5 0.85 7439 -89 -6 40,500 mg/Kg 500 100 7439 -92 -1 97.1 mg/Kg 0.75 0.28 7439 -96 -5 9,300 mg/Kg 500 100 7439 -96 -5 1,170 mg/Kg 2.5 0.31 7439 -97 -6 ND mg/Kg 2.5 0.50 7440 -02 -0 50.9 mg/Kg 2.5 0.70 7440 -09 -7 4,310 mg/Kg 500 100 7784 -49 -2 2.19 J mg/Kg 5.0 1.5 7440 -22-4 ND mg/Kg 1.0 0.43 7440 -23 -5 1,850 mg/Kg 500 100 7440 -28-0 ND mg/Kg 1.3 0.21 7440 -62 -2 79.7 mg/Kg 5.0 0.75 7440 -66 -6 768 mg/Kg I00 8.0 Analyst Initials: Prep Extract-Vol:. 12/30/2002 4 :31 :49PM Elan export123002.c 10 SAW 50 ;00 ml . • Rerun #: 1 Page3 of 8 Detailed Analytical Report Workorder (SDG): Project: Client: Client Project Number: Report Section: Client Sample Name: Analytica Alaska Inc. A0212038 Woners Bay Water Sample Alaska Dept of Environmental Conservation Kodiak Island Bourough Client Sample Report #2 Russ Creek Pond Matrix: Sediment Collection Date: 11/30/2002 2:55:OOPM Lab Sample Number: Prep Date: Analytical Method ID: Prep Method ID: Prep Batch Number: Report Basis: Sample prep wt. /vol: Analvte Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt 'Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc A0212038 -02A 12/20/2002 SW6020 - ICPMS - ICPMS Total 3050_ICP J021230010 As Received 0.10 g CASNo Result 7429 -90 -5 26,900 7440 -36 -0 41.1 7440 -38 -2 549 7440 -39 -3 191 7440 -41 -7 ND 7440 -43 -9 0.354 7440 -70 -2 37,900 7440 -47 -3 ND 7440 -48-4 0.382 7440 -50 -8 3.36 7439 -89 -6 1,090 7439 -92 -1 14.5 7439 -96 -5 9,240 7439 -96 -5 31.5 7439 -97 -6 ND 7440 -02 -0 1.89 7440 -09 -7 950 7784 -49 -2 ND 7440 -22-4 ND 7440 -23 -5 409 7440 -28-0 ND 7440 -62 -2 9.34 7440 -66 -6 21.0 Flags Units mg/Kg mg/Kg mg/Kg mg/Kg mg/Kg J mg/Kg mg/Kg mg/Kg J mg/Kg mg/Kg mg/Kg mg/Kg mg/Kg mg/Kg mg/Kg J mg/Kg mg/Kg mg/Kg mg/Kg J mg/Kg mg/Kg mg/Kg J mg/Kg POL MDL 25 1.7 2.5 7.5 1.3 1.5 1.0 500 7.5 0.50 2.5 500 0.75 500 2.5 2.5 2.5 500 5.0 1.0 500 1.3 5.0 100 0.15 0.70 0.32 0.50 0.31 100 2.5 0.15 0.85 100 0.28 100 0.31 0.50 0.70 100 1.5 0.43 100 0.21 0.75 8.0 Analysis Date: Instrument: File Name: Dilution Factor: 12/30/2002 4:35:56PM Elan export123002.c 10 Analyst Initials: SAW Prep Extract Vol: 50.00 ml Rerun #: Page 4 of 8 Detailed Analytical Report Workorder (SDG): Project: Client: Client Project Number: Report Section: Client Sample Name: Analytica Alaska Southeast A0212038 Woners Bay Water Sample Alaska Dept of Environmental Conservation Kodiak Island Bourough Method Blank Report Matrix: Solid Filter Blank Collection Date: 12/20/2002 12: 00:OOAM Lab Sample Number: Prep Date: Analytical Method ID: Prep Method ID: Prep Batch Number: Report Basis: Sample prep wt./vol: Analvte Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc J021230010 -MB Analysis Date: 12/20/2002 Instrument: SW6020 - ICPMS - ICPMS Total File Name: 3050_ICP Dilution Factor: J021230010 Percent Moisture Dry Weight Basis Analyst Initials: 0.10 g Prep Extract,Vol:, CASNo Result Flags Units PQL MDL 7429 -90 -5 21,600 mg/Kg 25 1.7 7440 -36-0 31.2 mg/Kg 2.5 0.15 7440 -38 -2 482 mg/Kg 7.5 0.70 7440 -39 -3 151 mg/Kg 1.3 0.32 7440 -41 -7 ND mg/Kg 1.5 0.50 7440 -43 -9 ND mg/Kg 1.0 0.31 7440 -70 -2 31,800 mg/Kg 500 100 7440 -47 -3 ND mg/Kg 7.5 2.5 7440 -48-4 0.214 J mg/Kg 0.50 0.15 7440 -50 -8 2.27 J mg/Kg 2.5 0.85 7439 -89 -6 759 mg/Kg 500 100 7439 -92 -1 12.0 mg/Kg 0.75 0.28 7439 -96 -5 7,950 mg/Kg 500 100 7439 -96 -5 23.3 mg/Kg 2.5 0.31 7439 -97 -6 ND mg/Kg 2.5 0.50 7440 -02 -0 1.51 J mg/Kg 2.5 0.70 7440 -09 -7 849 mg/Kg 500 100 7784 -49 -2 ND mg/Kg 5.0 1.5 7440 -22-4 2.27 mg/Kg 1.0 0.43 7440 -23 -5 383 J mg/Kg 500 100 7440 -28 -0 ND mg/Kg 1.3 0.21 7440 -62 -2 7.50 mg/Kg 5.0 0.75 7440 -66 -6 19.0 J mg/Kg 100 8.0 12/30/2002 4:03:50PM Elan export123002.c 10 NA SAW 50.00 mi Rerun #: 1 Page 5 of 8 Detailed Analytical Report Analytica Alaska Southeast Workorder (SDG): A0212038 Project: Woners Bay Water Sample Client: Alaska Dept of Environmental Conservation Client Project Number: Kodiak Island Bourough QC Recovery Report Work Order: A021203 8 Prep Batch Number: J021230010 Base Sample J021230010 -MB Anal. Method: SW6020 - ICPMS - ICPMS Total QC Sample J021230010 -LCS Sample Prep Date: 12/20/2002 12:00:OOAM QC Duplicate: 3021230010 -LCSD Analysis Units: mg/Kg SampleAaalysis Date: ' 12/30/2002 4:03:50PM Matrix: Solid QC Sample Analysis Date: 12/30/2002 4:07:58PM QC DUpSample Analysis Date: 12/30/2002 4:12:05PM Analyte SamP• Spike Sp Dup Spike Recov SpikeDup SPDUP.R LCL UCL RPD RPD Fl Rec Fl Result Res. Res Conc Conc EC Aluminum 21,600 66,400 57,700 100 80 120 14.02 Antimony 31.2 149 146 100 149.0 100 146.0 80 120 2.03 Arsenic 482 1,380 1,310 100 80 120 5.20 Barium 151 540 514 100 540.0 100 514.0 80 120 4.93 Beryllium ND 68.6 69.8 100 68.6 100 69.8 80 120 1.73 NOTE tIGH/HIGH HIGH/HIGH NOTEIIIGH/HIGH HIGH/HIGH LOW/LOW Cadmium ND 96.9 98.1 100 96.9 100 98.1 80 120 1.23 , Calcium 31,800 96,600 88,500 5,100 - 80 120 :8.75 NOTE° IGH/HIGH-, ;::"> Chromium ND 107 103 100 107.0 100 103.0 80 120 3.81 Cobalt 0.214 99.9 98.2 100 99.9 100 98.2 80 120 ' 1.72 Copper 2.27 102 102 100 102.0 100 102.0 80 120 0.00 Iron 759 3,160 2,970 1,100 287.3 1,100 270.0 80 120 6.20 Lead 12.0 127 129 100 127.0 100 129.0 80 120 1.56 Magnesium 7,950 28,000 25,400 5,100 549.0 5,100 498.0 80 120 9.74 Manganese 23.3 165 157 100 165.0 100 157.0 80 120 4.97 HIGH/HIGH HIGH/HIGH HIGH/HIGH HIGH/HIGH Mercury ND 1.78 1.77 80 120 Nickel 1.51 102 102 100 102.0 100 102.0 80 120 0.00 Potassium 849 7,290 7,220 5,100 142.9 5,100 141.6 80 120 0.96 HIGH/HIGH Selenium ND 99.6 101 100 99.6 100 _ 101.0 80 I20 1.40 Silver 2.27 96.8 102 100 96.8 100 102.0 80 120 5.23 Sodium 383 6,270 6,150 5,100 122.9 5,100 120.6 80 120 1.93 HIGH/HIGH Thallium ND 96.7 99.2 100 96.7 100 99.2 80 120 2.55 Vanadium 7.50 126 122 100 126.0 100 122.0 80 120 3.23 HIGH/HIGH Zinc 19.0 133 131 100 133.0 100 131.0 80 120 1.52 HIGH/HIGH FOOTNOTES TO QC REPORT Page 6 of 8 Detailed Analytical Report Analytica Alaska Southeast Workorder (SDG): Project: Client: Client Project Number: A0212038 Woners Bay Water Sample Alaska Dept of Environmental Conservation Kodiak Island Bourough Note 1: Results are shown to three significant figures to avoid rounding errors in calculations. Note 2: If the sample concentration is greater than 4 times the spike level, a recovery is not calculated, and the result should be used as a replicate. In such cases the spike is not as high as expected random measurement variability of the sample result itself. Note 3: For sample duplicates, if the result is less than the PQL, the duplicate RPD is not applicable and is shown as 0. If the sample and duplicate results are not five times the PQL or greater, then the RPD is not expected to fall within the window shown and the comparison should be made on the basis of the absolute difference. Analytica uses the criterion that the absolute difference should be less than the PQL for water or less than 2XPQL for other matrices. Lab Project ID: QC BATCH ASSOCIATIONS - BY METHOD BLANK 14,043 Lab Project Number: A0212038 Lab Method Blank Id: Prep Batch ID: Method: This Method blank and SampleNum A0212038 -01A A0212038 -02A J021230010 -LCS J021230010 -LCSD Prep Date: 12/20/2002 J021230010 -MB J021230010 SW6020 - ICPMS - ICPMS Total sample preparation batch are associated with the following samples, spikes, and duplicates: ClientSampleName #3 Breeham Pond (Baggy) #2 Russ Creek Pond LCS LCSD DataFile export123002.csv export 123002.csv export123002.csv exportl23002.csv AnalysisDate 12/30/2002 4:31:49PM 12/30/2002 4:35:56PM 12/30/2002 4:07:58PM 12/30/2002 4:12:05PM Page 7 of 8 Detailed Analytical Report Analytica Alaska Southeast Workorder (SAG): A0212038 Project: Woners Bay Water Sample Client: Alaska Dept of Environmental Conservation Client Project Number: Kodiak Island Bourough DATA FLAGS AND DEFINITIONS The PQL is the Method Quantitation Limit as defined by USACE. Reporting Limit: Limit below which results are shown as "ND ". This may be the PQL, MDL, or a value between. See the report conventions below. Result Field: ND = Not Detected at or above the Reporting Limit NA = Analyte not applicable (see Case Narrative for discussion) Qualifier Fields: LOW = Recovery is below Lower Control Limit HIGH = Recovery , RPD, or other parameter is above Upper Control Limit E = Reported concentration is above the instrument calibration upper range Organic Analysis Flags: B = Analyte was detected in the laboratory method blank J = Analyte was detected above MDL or Reporting Limit but below the Quant Limit (PQL) Inorganic Analysis Flags: J = Analyte was detected above the Reporting Limit but below the Quant Limit (PQL) W = Post digestion spike did not meet criteria S = Reported value determined by the Method of Standard Additions (MSA) Other Flags may be applied. See Case Narrative for Description TestPkgName 6020/3050B (Solid) - ICPMS Total REPORTING CONVENTIONS FOR THIS REPORT Basis # Sig Figs Reporting Limit Dry Weight Basis 3 Report to PQL Page 8 of 8 Air and Water Quality 0 • • r v'V ANALYTICA ALASKA INC. grvip.cpifl Q2DO -3 Afttfttge,AK 5436131noit *Rau 1210himinalegos llow.00111211 Vi. sit,* 4446114th* 4137)490 Mt* (*)*SeiVilt4-04M7 • ,ilis.(0)41034 F M258:212504% di al sis Request • 'VII II.4%■ • ...-. .... ,. — WPM/ WM Kcch4- k (cmc,0 f; e) sir oa v3-(orwexit( 13 (ZS. 1164-.1_ ots— p.o.faxt,64 7"9"41c---5‘26.-9 34-0 FAX 6„x g o-7- -,G, • co,!•0: il 1127MMO bt . / 111111111111111111/01401111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 MEEPoi MN VAMICIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMINIMIIMOWIAMMIHM11111111111111111111111111 IIKIMMi bA.Nrat1111111111INIIIININNIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIININIIIMMII MENIIIIIIIIIIIIMIMIIIIIM111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111MIIIIIIIIIIIM INININIMIIIIIIMINIIIIIINININIIIIIMMIMINI IMININ1111111.11111.1111111101111111111 No 11111111111111111111IIIIMNIIIIIIIIMmulaniummuummummomum 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111110111111111111111111111111111111 IIIIIIIMMIIIIMMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMMMOMINIIIIIIIIIIMIMI 111111111um NIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN 11111111111111111•1111111111111EM1111111111111011111111111111111111111111.11111111111.1111111111111111111111MMIN 11111111111M11111111111111111111 1111111•1•11111111.1.11111111111111111111111111111111111MMNI11111111111111111111111111111111111111.111111111111111111111111 447131r6 4 c it -6, ct 69,a A ..e. en) v1/4 t 44' 'er-o- d? 1' Ato S 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111•111111111111111111111111111M - aommod5 irsuwi01140 ta irazo-magin-eia•ri ars 1. , clew ___ *woos '114 , - , a , • • P =Mae: . ,I 'I- ''' ,•1' • ANALiTte.ittiStatiLY: . j 441,411A1711.11 . '',.;ziarier.adeskmx ,--k, IIINAMInb.....agik . . u , , sif h• I., AIIP 111 Id, ' al II kI alk7.1 1114, idpRCl , •...• . . , . k a . „ , • Otit ' I i 2114 *tinge: Drilenn*: 1 62 . i Daderinge i , , . R .. eficc Ia1 A cf_ 63'4 " 1 ; .1 '3 ckL cc,* j_ 4-s7,123. {-4 ,ttiv pb- A- EC, --(-) k_h.f, @ -67e,— %? 4 Mr. George Cline, Operator SPI, Inc. 207 E. Northern Lights Blvd. Anchorage, AK 99503 Dear Mr. Cline OFFICE of the MANAGER 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Phone (907) 486-9301 Fax (907) 486-9374 E-mail: 1whiddon@lcib.co.kodiak.ak.us RE: ADEC Notice of Violation of Air Quality. Nov. 14, 2002 We want to recognize up front, your forthright manner in dealing with the recent notice of violation of emission standards and the effort you have put forth in bringing your plant back into compliance. We have reviewed the details of your current situation and the type and degree of oversite available from ADEC and have concerns about the long-term presence of your operation in and around residential property. Our review finds that the performance standards and enforcement process of ADEC has evolved over time and there are legitimate concerns about adequacy in relationship to an operation like yours in a residential area. It is important to point out that neither the Industrial zone or performance standards were adopted by KIB with an operation like yours in mind. We recognize that your operation is now in compliance with ADEC requirements and we are confident that you will continue to operate within their standards. That being said, we are not able to declare to the public that the air and water quality issues are adequately addressed. This issue needs further review to determine appropriate standards and methods of oversite. Based on this, we are willing to authorize your operation under the following conditions. SPI Inc. is allowed to operate until Jan. 1, 2003 to process the balance of soils in your current contract so long as you remain in full compliance with ADEC standards. 2. SPI Inc. agrees to submit to permit review prior to beginning operations in the spring. 3 SPI Inc. will provide to KIB copies of all operational reports and correspondence with ADEC and other agencies during the operational time frame. We hope these conditions meet with your approval and look forward to working with you on a long-term solution that minimizes impacts on your operation and yet insures the public health is safeguarded. \\dove\users\pcarlson\SPI Letter.doc Page 1 of 2 If the terms of this agreement are acceptable to SPI Inc., please acknowledge by signing below and returning the original to the office of the Borough Manager prior to resuming operation. Sincerely Kodiak Island Borough Pat Carlson, Manager I hereby agree to the conditions set forth in this document: George Cline, SPI Inc. Date Wove\userApcarlson\SPI Letter.doc Page 2 of 2 Soil .Processing Bells Flats Kodiak, AK 99615 Project: Bells Flats Kodiak Project Number: [ ye] &woo 6144c. Rang.' roc' e -S Project Manager: George Cline Reported: 05/05/03 09:50 Gasoline Hydrocarbons (n- Hexane to <n- Decane) and BTEX per AK101 North Creek Analytical - Mobile Lab Analyse Result Reporting Limit Units Dilution Method Prepared Analyzed Batch Notes SP! 03 -1.1 (M305004 -01) Soil Sampled: 05/02/03 Received: 05 /03/03 Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons Benzene Toluene Ethyl benzene Xylencs (total) ,ND`. 1.07 mg/kg dry 33.33 ;ND 0.00854 ND : 0.0427 " " ND: 0.0427 ',NW' ' 0.0854 AK 101 rt 05/03/03 05/03/03 0305006 x rr tt Surr: a, a, a -TFT (FID) Srr: a, o, a -%7T (ND) 'I'li (M305004 -02) Soil 89.6 % 50 -150 85.2 % 52.6 -134 Sampled: 05 /02/03 Received: 05 /03/03 Gasoline Rangc Hydrocarbons ND, 1.67 mg/kg wet 33.33 AK 101 05/03/03 05/03/03 0305006 Benzene ND` 0.0133 " Toluene ND: 0.0667 " n " n " Ethyl benzene ND,' 0.0667 Xylencs (total) ND 0.133 Surr: a, a, a -TFT (F1D) 94.7 % 50 -150 Srr: a,a,a- TF7'(PID) 89.4 % 52.6 -134 ECE VIE MAY 2.7 D COMMUNITY DEVEt OPMENT DEPARTM, ENT North Creek Analytical - Mobile Lab Tim McKeown, Mobile Lab Chemist The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 3 of 11 Soit .i'rocessin}; Dells plats Kodiak, AK 99615 Project: Bells Flats Kodiak Project Number: [none] Project Manager: George Cline Reported: 05/05/03 09:50 Diesel Hydrocarbons (C10 -C25) and Heavy Oil (C25 -C36) per AK102 and AK103 North Creek Analytical - Mobile Lab Annlyte Result Reporting Limit Units Dilution Method Prepared Analyzed Batch Notes SP! 03 -1.1 (M305004 -01) Soil Sampled: 05 /02/03 Received: 05 /03/03 Residual Range Organics Diesel Range Organics '16.0 12.5 mg/kg dry 279 10.0 " AK102/103 05/03/03 05/03/03 0305005 Sur r. /- C.hloroocioa' cane Sum Triaconlanu 102% 50 -150 93.8 % 50 -150 North Creek Analytical - Mobile Lab The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Tim McKeown, Mobile Lab Chemist 4 of 11 Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274 -3000 Stockpile Number: Job 43 -2 Tonnage: 500 tons Ending Treatment Date: 5 -16 -03 Sampled By: J. Fabiano Origination of Soil: U.SCG_SAA- -04'' ADEC spill # 1991 - 2501 - 172551 This report outlines the findings of third party sampling. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for the treated soil stockpile as directed by the Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. The samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. One analytical sample was collected from the location showing the highest PID reading. The cooler was delivered to North Creek Analytical's field lab in Kodiak. (ADEC Certification UST -058). Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. One analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. The 500 -ton stockpiles will be separated into 3 individual stockpiles, which aid in sampling and will carry the same number. 1 Sample Collection: Sample PID Screening Analytical Sample Time, Lab ID 3 -2 1 -1 0.0 _ND RL_1.2.5 ND 'RL, 1.23_::. ND RL 0.0984 3 -2 1 -2 0.0 3 -2 1 -3 36.3 3 -2 2-4 7.9 3 -2 2 -5 2.3 3 -2 2 -6 112 . yes 14:10 M305015 3 -2 3 -7 47.2 3 -2 3 -8 13.2 3 -2 3 -9 75.6 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, ORO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from North Creek Analytical and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non- detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location ; DRO ) . l _ GRO RRO_ ; (2000mg/kg) 14.3 10.0 (100 mg/kg) (50 mg/kg) SPI 3 -2 2 -6 '. _ND RL_1.2.5 ND 'RL, 1.23_::. ND RL 0.0984 Volatile Results Sample ID Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) Xylene (69 mg/kg) , SPI 3 -2 2 -6 TND RL 0.009841 <<ND RL.0.0492._ t AND RL 0.04.92 ND RL 0.0984 2 Sample nomenclature: Example: SPI 15-2-3-6 SPI - for Soil Processing, 15 - for the Job #, 2 - represents a 500 ton quantity, 3 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 6 - for sample location of a field screening. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results from North Creek Analytical. These soils meet ADEC cleanup levels for DRO; GRO, RRO and BTEX and are ready for review by ADEC. -Jeannie Fabiano Alaska TestLab Kodiak Alaska Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274 -3000 Stockpile Number: Jobi #4 -1__� Tonnage: 660 lbs. Ending Treatment Date: 5 -16 -03 Sampled By: J. Fabiano Origination of Soil: Soils fromCDOT by Shannon - _Wi,lson__ ADEC spill # 1993 - 2509 -07401 This report outlines the findings of third party sampling. One Field Screening Sample was collected for the treated soil.. The sample location was accessed using a shovel. One analytical sample was collected from this location. The cooler was delivered to North Creek Analytical's field lab in Kodiak. (ADEC Certification UST -058). Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. One analytical sample will be taken for each successive. 500 tons. (°\ he 500 -ton stockpiles will be separated into 3, individual stockpiles, which aid in sampling and will carry the same number. 1 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, MO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from North Creek Analytical and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non - detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location DRO . - (100 mg/kg) GRO (50 mg/kg) RRO (2000mg/kg) 12.5`' SPI 4 -1 :ND_RL_10:0�" t -NDµ RL: 1.:07 --ND- -RL-0, -043:0 - 1,ND RI: 0:0430; ND RL-0:0859 Volatile Results Sample ID Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) .Xylene (69 mg/kg) SPI 4-1 ,,ND"R1::0 00859 r" --ND- -RL-0, -043:0 - 1,ND RI: 0:0430; ND RL-0:0859 Sample nomenclature: Example: SPI 15 -2 -3 -6 SPI - for Soil Processing, 15 - for the Job #, 2 - represents a 500 ton quantity, 3 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 6 - for sample location of a field. screening. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. 2 Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confir results from North Creek Analytical. ory analytical These soils meet ADEC cleanup levels for DRO, GRO, RRO and BTEX and are ready for review by ADEC. 2.7 Jeannie Fabiano Alaska TestLab Kodiak Alaska 3 Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274 -3000 Stockpile Number: Job #2 CJty_oL Kodiak "> Tonnage: 390.89 Tons Ending Treatment Date: 5 -4 -03 Sampled By: J. Fabiano Origination of Soil: City of Kodiak Contaminated soils Storage area This report outlines the findings of third party sampling. Two Field Screening Samples . were collected for each of the three treated soil stockpile. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. The samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. One analytical sample was collected from the location showing the highest PID reading. The cooler was delivered to North Creek Analytical's filed lab located in Kodiak (ADEC Certification UST -058). Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. One analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. The 500 -ton stockpiles will be separated into 3 individual stockpiles, which aid in sampling and will carry the same number. 1 Sample Collection: Sample PID Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI 2 -1.1 0.0 ,.13.4 TRL_1.0.0J _ND...,RL1...08 1 ND RL 0.0864 SPI 2 -1.2 1.1 SPI 2 -2.3 12.9 SPI2 -2.4 130 Yes 7:33pm M305008 -1 SPI 2 -3.5 23.6 SPI 2 -3.6 109 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, DRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103,,as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from Analytica and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non - detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location DRO GRO _a (50 mg/kg) . '.RRO .� (100 mg/kg) (2000mg/kg) (42.t RL 2-.5 SPI 2 -2.4 ,.13.4 TRL_1.0.0J _ND...,RL1...08 1 ND RL 0.0864 Vola e Results Sample ID Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) Xylene (69. ing/kg) SPI 2 -2.4 ND RL 0.00864 ND RL 0.432 ND RL 0.432. ND RL 0.0864 2 Sample nomenclature: Example: SPI 15-2-3 SPI.- for Soil Processing, 15 - for the stockpile number, 2 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 3 - for sample location in that specific pile. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons). have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results from Analytica. This stockpile Meets ADEC cleanup levels for GRO, DRO, RRO and BTEX and is ready for review and removal by ADEC. Jeannie Fabiano Alaska TestLab Kodiak Alaska 5?) Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report A30226 Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A • Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274-3000 Stockpile Number:qob-l1Stkp_15_ Tonnage: 500 Tons Ending Treatment Date:8-6-03 Sampled By: S. Fabiano Origination of Soil:::ichugoo; ADEC Spill #2001-2501-11451 This report outlines the findings of third party sampling. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for each of the treated soil stockpile as directed by the Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. Nine samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. One analytical sample was collected from the location showing the highest PID reading. The cooler was delivered to North Creek Analytical's lab in Anchorage AK. Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. One analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. The 500-ton stockpiles will be separated into 3 individual stockpiles, which aid in sampling and will carry the same number. Sample Collection: Sample PID Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI 11 -5 1 -1 666 ND RL 17.6. SPI 11 -5 2 -4 17.4 RL_9.34. _-____ SPI 11 -5 1 -2 2000 pk Yes 210 A3H0018 -01 SPI 11 -5 1 -3 329 2 -4 '_0:00877 -R_t- _ 0.008021 -'C _ND _RL Q..0 :16.0_= _- SPI 11 -5 2 -4 2000 pk Yes 215 A3H0018 -02 SPI 11 -5 2 -5 1949 SPI 11 -5 2 -6 556 SPI 11 -5 3 -7 37.7 SPI 11 -5 3 -8 259 SPI 11 -5 3 -9 1137 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, DRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from North Creek Analytical and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non - detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location DRO (100 mg/kg) GRO (50 mg/kg) RRO (2000mg/kg) SPI 11 -5 1 -2 7,17.8__RL:8-.79 —.______- _ND_RL,2.54=:-=: - _ __ ND RL 17.6. SPI 11 -5 2 -4 17.4 RL_9.34. _-____ _ND__RL1- .60 - - - - -- —2-3',6 RL-= 1- 8:7 —__: 7-ND-R1.3 0.0254 ; - ND,RL 0.0254 't. Volatile Results Sample ID Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) Xylene • (69 mg/kg) SPI 11 -5 1 -2 .ND_RL_0.0127Lv. N-D_RL_0.,0254__ 7-ND-R1.3 0.0254 ; - ND,RL 0.0254 't. SPI 11 -5 2 -4 '_0:00877 -R_t- _ 0.008021 -'C _ND _RL Q..0 :16.0_= _- _.._ND__RL_0.0.1760 - -' 0.0258 RL- 0:.0160! _ ------ - -- 2 Sample nomenclature: Example: SPI 15-2-3-6 5PI for Soil Processing, 15 - for the Job #, 2 - represents a 500 ton quantity, 3 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 6 - for sample location of a field screening. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results from North Creek Analytical. Job #11 Stkp 5 meets ADEC cleanup levels for DRO, RRO, GRO and BTEX and is ready for review and disposal instructions from AbEC. Jeannie Fabiano Alaska TestLab Kodiak Alaska 3 PI Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report A30226 Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274-3000 Stockpile Number:, -Job-11-L-6 Tonnage: 500 Tonw Ending Treatment Date:8-11-03 Sampled By: J. Fabiano Origination of Soil:-_Chuyeith------Spir'uce_cape___ _ ADEC Spill # 2001-2501-11451 This report outlines the findings of third party sampling. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for each of the treated soil stockpile as directed by the Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. Nine samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. One analytical sample was collected from the location showing the highest PID reading. The cooler was delivered to North Creek Analytical's lab in Anchorage AK. Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. One analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. The 500-ton stockpiles will be separated into 3 individual stockpiles, which aid in sampling and will carry the same number. Sample Collection: Sample PID Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI 11-6 1-1 725 _.Na RL 19.J, _ND RL 0.G183- : ND—RE-0.0-1'83-1 SPI 11-6 1-2 1789 SPI 11-6 1-3 1761 SPI 11-6 2-4 275 SPI 11-6 2-5 1813 SPI 11-6 2-6 1994 Yes 1115 A3F10019-01 SPI 11-6 3-7 1664 SPI 11-6 3-8 188 SPI 11-6 3-9 287 Analytic& Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, DRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from North Creek Analytical and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non-detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location DRO (100 mg/kg) GRO (50 mg/kg) RRO (2000mg/kg) SPI 11-6 2-6 ''-. ND RI..„9.57__ _ .__ _ ND _RL.1.83 _.Na RL 19.J, _ND RL 0.G183- : ND—RE-0.0-1'83-1 Volatile Results Sample ID Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) Xylene (69 mg/kg) SPI 11-6 2-6 _Na_.-AL-0,0091:6 -ND- RI., 0.0183- . _ _ND RL 0.G183- : ND—RE-0.0-1'83-1 2 Sample nomenclature: Example: SPI 15 -2 -3 -6 SPI - for Soil Processing, 15 - for the Job #, 2 - represents a 500 ton quantity, 3 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 6 - for sample location of a field screening. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results from North Creek Analytical. Job #11 Stkp 6 Meets ADEC clean up levels for GRO, RRO, NO and BTEX and is ready for review and disposal instructions from ADEC. Jeannie Fabian() Alaska TestLab Kodiak Alaska Mzz/A/ku 3 Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report A30226 Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274 -3000 Stockpile Number: ;Job #11.. Stkp 7 Tonnage; 500 -- - - -� - - -- - - -- - Ending Treatment bate: 8 -13 -03 Sampled By:J. Fabiano Origination of Soil- Chugac{ Spruce -Cape AbEC Spill #2001 -2501 -11451 This report outlines the findings of third party sampling. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for each of the treated soil stockpile as directed by the Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. Nine samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. One analytical sample was collected from the location showing the highest PIb reading. The cooler was delivered to North Creek Analytical's lab in Bothell WA. Samples were shipped under_ Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. One analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. The 500 -ton stockpiles will be separated into 3 individual stockpiles, which aid in sampling and will carry the same number. Sample Collection: Sample PID Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI 11-7 1-1 11.3 2-571 R.I.:23:0--R ND RL 0.05_00 _ ND. R170.10-0- 7 SPI 11-7 1-2 11.3 SPI 11-7 1-3 9.3 SPI 11-7 2-4 56.6 • SPI 11-7 2-5 817 Yes 1:15 B3H0281-01 SPI 11-7 2-6 5.3 SPI 11-7 3-7 167 SPI 11-7 3-8 192 SPI 11-7 3-9 101 Analytic& Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, DRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from North Creek Analytical and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non-detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location DRO (100 mg/kg) GRO (50 mg/kg) RRO (2000mg/kg) SPI 11-7 2-5 3Li..7_ RL, 4,00 __ . _ '_ND _RL_5.00 - 2-571 R.I.:23:0--R ND RL 0.05_00 _ ND. R170.10-0- 7 Volatile Results Sample ID Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) Xylene (69 mg/kg) SPI 11-7 2-5 ND---RL 0.0200 _ND RI-0.0500 _ ND RL 0.05_00 _ ND. R170.10-0- 7 2 Sample nomenclature: Example: SPI 15-2-3-6 SPI - for Soil Processing, 15 - for the Job #, 2 - represents a 500 ton quantity, 3 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 6 - for sample location of a field screening. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results from North Creek Analytical. Job #11 Stkp 7 meets ADEC clean up levels for GRO, DRO, RRO and BTEX and is ready for review by ADEC for disposal direction. Jeannie Fabiano Alaska TestLab Kodiak Alaska 3 Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report A30226 Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274-3000 Stockpile Number: Job 11 Stkp 4 Tonnage: 500 Tons Ending Treatment Date: 8-6-03 Sampled By: J. Fabiano Origination of Soil:;Chciggtf-xiSprsitice ADEC Spill # 2001-2501-11451 This report outlines the findings of third party sampling. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for the treated soil stockpile as directed by the Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. The samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. One analytical sample was collected from the location showing the highest PIO reading. The cooler was delivered to North Creek Analytical's field lab in Anchorage. (ADEC Certification UST-058). Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. One analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. The 500-ton stockpiles will be separated into 3 individual stockpiles, which aid in sampling and will carry the same number. Sample Collection: Sample PID Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID 75PI_1.1= .4_3 7_7__ SPI 11 -4 1 -1 30.7 -± _.ND:-RL 1-2:5 ----' SPI 11 -4 1 -2 9.0 SPI 11 -4 1 -3 15.9 SPI 11 -4 2 -4 271 SPI 11 -4 2 -5 60.8 SPI 11 -4 2 -6 38,8 SPI 11 -4 3 -7 603 Yes 1100 M308002 -01 SPI 11 -4 3 -8 3.0 SPI 11 -4 3 -9 81.3 . .. „ ..,.. Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, DRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from North Creek, Analytical and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non - detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location DRO (100 mg/kg) GRO (50 mg/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) RRO (2000mg/kg)_ „.,_.__._..._ 75PI_1.1= .4_3 7_7__ NQ- _RL_10.0- -` - - - ND" _RL_.1..04_ -_- -± _.ND:-RL 1-2:5 ----' Volatile Results Sample ID Location Benzene (0.02'mglkg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) Xylene (69 mg/kg) . _SP -I -1-I -4 3 =7 -- 7ND RL 0 "008334 - 7ND -RL 0-.041 T _�m_ -.ND _RL 0 04.1:7::.___.~.:._ ND:'RI 0.08'33 2 Sample nomenclature: Example: SPI 15-2-3-6 SPI - for Soil Processing, 15 - for the Job #, 2 - represents a 500 ton quantity, 3 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 6 - for sample location of a field screening. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results from North Creek Analytical. Job 11 Stkp 4 meets ADEC clean up levels for GRO. DRO, RRO and BTEX and is ready for review and directions by AbEC. Jeannie Fabiano Alaska TestLab Kodiak. Alaska c/27-‘470 3 Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report A30226 Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274 -3000 Stockpile Number:i Job 11 Stkp 8 Tonnage: 500 Tons Ending Treatment bate: 8 -17 -03 Sampled By: J. Fabiano Origination of Soil: Chugach = -Spruce Cape AbEC Spill #2001- 2501 -11451 This report outlines the findings of third party sampling. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for each of the treated soil stockpile as directed by the Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. Nine samples were field screened•with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. One analytical sample was collected from the location showing the highest PIb reading. The cooler was delivered to North Creek Analytical's Bothell WA. Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. One analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. The 500 -ton stockpiles will be separated into 3 individual stockpiles, which aid in sampling and will carry the same number. Sample Collection: Sainple PID Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI 11-8 1-1 8.8' • -NDTRL 002757 77:— . SP -8 1-2 1632 Yes 1125 B3H0455-01 SPI 11-8 1-3 0.0 SPI 11-8 2-4 0.0 SPI 11-8 2-5 0.0 SPI 11-8 2-6 21.9 . SPI 11-8 3-7 360 ' SPI 11-8 3-8 852 SPI 11-8 3-9 108 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, DRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from North Creek Analytical and .were compared to the required cleanup level. Non-detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID . . Location DRO (100 mg/kg) GRO (50 mg/kg) . ' • RRO' (2000mg/kg),_. SPI 11-8 1-2 t1.5.6_RL_4..00_,..._ _ND 111.„2,75 -._._ • -NDTRL 002757 77:— - NIT Ri; 00549 -1 . . Volatile Results Sample ID Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) . Ethyl Benzene -. , (5 mg/kg) • Toluene • , - . -: . -(4:8 mg/kg) ' . '' . . - - Xylene . (69 mg/kg) SPI 11-8 1-2 ---. -ND- RE 0.0110— -ND–RL-0'.-0275•;----- -NDTRL 002757 77:— - NIT Ri; 00549 -1 2 Sample nomenclature: Example: SPI 15 -2 3 -6 SPI - for Soil Processing, 15 - for the Job #, 2 - represents a 500 ton quantity, 3 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 6 - for sample location of a field screening. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results from North Creek Analytical. Job 11 Stkp 8 meets ADEC clean up levels for DRO, RRO, GRO and BTEX and are ready for review and disposal instructions from ADEC. Jeannie Fabiano Alaska TestLab Kodiak Alaska Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report A30226 Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274 -3000 Stockpile Number:`,-,Job- 11-stkp -9 Tonnage: 257.81 Ending Treatment Date: 8 -20 -03 Sampled By: J. Fabiano Origination of Soil: Chugach- Spruce-Ca-pie ADEC spill # 2001 - 2501 -11451 5P% This report outlines the findings of third party sampling. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for each of the treated soil stockpile as directed by the Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. Nine samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. One analytical sample was collected from the location showing the highest PID reading. The cooler was delivered to North Creek Analytical's Bothell WA lab. Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. One analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. The 500 -ton stockpiles will be separated into 3 individual stockpiles, which aid in sampling and will carry the same number. Sample Collection: Sample PID Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI 11-9 1-1 0.5 .ND Rt 0.0270 ND RL 0.0270 Na RL 0.0540 SPI 11-9 1-2 829 SPI 11-9 1-3 15.4 SPI 11-9 2-4 19.4 SPI 11-9 2-5 128 SPI 11-9 2-6 22.1 SPI 11-9 3-7 1537 SPI 11-9 3-8 432 SPI 11-9 3-9 1926 Yes 1045 B3H0589-01 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, DRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from North Creek Analytical and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non-detect results are indicated by ND and are below the. PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location DRO (100 mg/kg) GRO (50 mg/kg) RRO (2000mg/kg) 411--RL25-.0- SPI 11793:9 - -25.7 RL4.00 - ND RL-2.7 .ND Rt 0.0270 ND RL 0.0270 Na RL 0.0540 Volatile Results Sample ID Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) Xylene (69 mg/kg) SPI 11-9 3-9 ND RL,0.0_1_08 .__ .ND Rt 0.0270 ND RL 0.0270 Na RL 0.0540 2 Sample nomenclature: Example: 5131 15-2-3-6 SPI - for Soil Processing, 15 - for the Job #, 2 - represents a 500 ton quantity, 3 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 6 - for sample location of a field screening. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results from North Creek Analytical. Job 11 Stkp 9 meets ADEC clean up levels for DRO, RRO, GRO and BTEX and is ready for review and disposal instructions by ADEC. Jeannie Fabiano Alaska Test Lab Kodiak Alaska 3 Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report A30451 Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274-3000 Stockpile Number:;31ob7:16 Tonnage: 34.07 Tons Ending Treatment bate: 8-21-03 Sampled By: J.,,Fabiano__ Origination of NC-Cdt ADEC spill #03-2499-17601 This report outlines the findings of third party sampling. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for the treated soil stockpile as directed by the Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. Three samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. One analytical sample was collected from the location showing the highest PIE) reading. The cooler was delivered to North Creek Analytical's Bothell Lab. Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached.. Sample Collection: Sample PID Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI 16-1-1 29.7 _0 ,0182RL 0.0166_ -0.-139- RL 0.01-66 , 0._166_,RL 0.033T; SPI 16-1-2 175 SPI 16-1-3 PK 2000 Yes 1105 B3H0592-01 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, DRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from North Creek Analytical and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non-detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location DRO (100 mg/kg) GRO (50 mg/kg) RRO (2000mg/kg) _35.0_RL 25.0_ SPI 16-1-3 .:11.8 RL _4.00 -- - -- -ND RL 1.66 _ _ _0 ,0182RL 0.0166_ -0.-139- RL 0.01-66 , 0._166_,RL 0.033T; Volatile Results Sample ID Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (51118/4) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) Xylene (69 mg/kg) SPI 1:6:1-3 _ 0.02-84 RI-- -_ _ 0.00663 _0 ,0182RL 0.0166_ -0.-139- RL 0.01-66 , 0._166_,RL 0.033T; 2 Sample nomenclature: Example: SPI 15-2-3-6 SPI - for Soil Processing, 15 - for the Job #, 2 - represents a 500 ton quantity, 3 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 6 - for sample location of a field screening. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results from North Creek Analytical. Job 16 Stkp 1 meets AbEC cleanup levels for GRO, FRO and RRO but fails to meet the benzene cleanup level of 0.02. Please advise SPI with instructions. Jeannie Fabiano Alaska Test Lab Kodiak Alaska Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report A30450 Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274-3000 Stockpile Number: Job_1515fkp 1: Tonnage: .68 T Ending Treatment Date: 8-21-03 Sampled By: J. Fabiano Origination orSoil: T&R---- Port Lions—. ADEC spill # 02-27-99-100-01 This report outlines the findings of third party sampling. Two Field Screening Samples were collected for the treated soil stockpile as directed by the Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. The samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. One analytical sample was collected from the location showing the highest PID reading. The cooler was delivered to North Creek Analytical's Bothell Lab. Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached., Sample Collection: Sample P ID Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI 15-1-1 193 36.3 RL25.0 - - : 0.0848 RL 0.0242 0.0727 IRL 0.0483 SPI 15-1-2 313 Yes 1100 B3H0591-01 • Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, DRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from North Creek Analytical and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non-detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location DRO (100 mg/kg) GRO (50 mg/kg) RRO (2000mg/kg) SPI 15-1-2 -11.1 -RL.4.00 . ND R 2.42 __ 36.3 RL25.0 - - : 0.0848 RL 0.0242 0.0727 IRL 0.0483 Volatile Results Sample ID Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) • Xylene (69 mg/kg) SPI 15-1-2 0:0355--R-L-0.00967- ND R-L 0.0242-- 0.0848 RL 0.0242 0.0727 IRL 0.0483 • 2 Sample nomenclature: Example: SP' 15-2-3-6 SPI - for Soil Processing, 15 - for the Job #, 2 - represents a 500 ton quantity, 3 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 6 - for sample location of a field screening. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results from North Creek Analytical, Job 15 Stkp 1 Stkp meets ADEC cleanup levels for GRO , RRO and RRO but does not meet ADEC cleanup levels for Benzene. Please review and make recommendations. Jeannie Fabian° Alaska TestLab Kodiak Alaska 3 Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report A30226 'Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274-3000 Stockpile Number:-Job-12 Stkp--1-c4( 2 Tonnage: 93.4 Tons Ending Treatment Date: 8-21-03 Sampled By: j. Fabiano Origination of Soil: ADOT ADEC Spill # 99-25-00-224-01 This report outlines the findings of third party sampling. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for each of the treated soil stockpiles as directed by the Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. Six samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. Two analytical samples were collected from the locations showing the highest PID reading of each pile. The cooler was delivered to North Creek Analytical's Bothell WA lab. Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. Sample Collection: Sample PID Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI 12-1-1 27.0 , 16.3 RL 4..00 ---- --ND- RL-2.19, SPI 12-1-2 529 9.08 RL,4.00___ _ ND RL-2.37- - -ND RL 25.0 SPI 12-1-3 PK 2000 Yes 1050 B3H0590-01 SPI 12-2-4 0.0 SPI 12- 2-5 85 SPI 12-2-6 181 Yes 1055 B3H0590-02 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, DRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from North Creek Analytical and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non-detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) DRO (100 mg/kg) GRO (50 mg/kg) RRO (2000mg/kg) -29.5 }L25.0 SPI 12-1-3 SPI 12-1-3 , 16.3 RL 4..00 ---- --ND- RL-2.19, SPI 12-2-6 ' 9.08 RL,4.00___ _ ND RL-2.37- - -ND RL 25.0 ' Volatile Results Sample ID Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) Xylene (69 mg/kg) SPI 12-1-3 .ND. RL 0.00876 ND RL 0.0219— ND---RI., 0.0219 __ . .ND RL 0.0438 - SPI 12-2-6 ND -RL 0,00948 - ND _RL 0.0237_ ND-RL-0.0237______ _ _ND RL_0.0474' 2 Sample nomenclature: Example: SPI 15-2-3-6 SPI - for Soil Processing, 15 - for the Job #, 2 - represents a 500 ton r quantity, 3 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 6 - for sample location of a field screening. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results from North Creek Analytical. Job 12 Stkp 1 & 2 meet ADEC cleanup levels for DRO, GRO, RRO and BTEX and are ready for review and disposal instructions by ADEC. Jeannie Fabiano Alaska Test Lab Kodiak Alaska 3 Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report A30226 Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274-3000 Stockpile Number: Job J3Stk-p Tonnage: 161.69 Ending Treatment bate: 8-23-03 Sampled By: J. Fabian° Origination of Soil: Gary Peterson _SP/ This report outlines the findings of third party sampling. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for each of the treated soil stockpile as directed by the. Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. Nine samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. Three analytical samples were collected from the location showing the highest PIb reading of each pile. The cooler was delivered to North Creek Analytical's Bothell lab. Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. Sample Collection: Sample PID Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI 13-1-1 77,5 Yes 240 B3H0656-01 SPI 13-1-2 7.4 SPI 13-3-8 24.4 RL 4.00 ND RL 2.53 - - SPI 13-1-3 54.2 ND RL 0.0253 ND RL .O.0253 ND RL 00505 - ---: SPI 13-2-4 396 Yes 245 B3H0656-02 SPI 13-2-5 394 SPI 13-2-6 112 SPI 13-3-7 1.7 SPI 13-3-8 7.6 Yes 250 . B3H0656-03 SPI 13-3-9 1.1 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, DRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from North Creek Analytical and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non-detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location DRO (100 mg/kg) GRO (50 mg/kg) RRO (2000mg/kg) SPI 13-1-1 -15.5 RL 4.00 ND- RL 2:21 - - - 49:1 -RL-25,0--- 7 SPI 13-2-4 30.6 RL 4.00 ND RL 2.60 6 .6- RL 25.0 -, SPI 13-3-8 24.4 RL 4.00 ND RL 2.53 - - 74.0 RL 25.0 - Volatile Results Sample ID Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) Xylene (69 mg/kg) SPI 13-1-1 ND RL Q.00884_ ND_ RL 0.0221_ __ ND :RL 0.0221 . _ ND RL 0.0442 SPI 13-2-4 ' ND _RL .0.0104 - ND RL 0.0260 ND RL_Q.0260 _ND RL 0.0520 SPI 13-3-8 ]RL 0.0101 ND RL 0.0253 ND RL .O.0253 ND RL 00505 - ---: 2 Sample nomenclature: Example: SPI 15-2-3-6 SP' - for Soil Processing, 15 - for the Job #, 2 - represents a 500 ton quantity, 3 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 6 - for sample location of a field screening. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results from North Creek Analytical. Job 13 Stkp 1, 2 & 3 meet AbEC cleanup levels for GRO, RRO, bRO and BTEX and are ready for review and disposal instructions by AbEC. Jeannie Fabiano Alaska Test Lab Kodiak Alaska IlAi;w2) 3 $P/ Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report A30226 Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274-3000 Stockpile Number: Jp 114iT5k1c 2 Tonnage: 80.15 Tons Ending Treatment bate: 8-24-03 Sampled By: J. Fabian° Origination of Soil:7C--ity-of-Odiak ADEC spill #03249912201 This report outlines the findings of third party sampling. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for each of the treated soil stockpile as directed by the Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. Six samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. Two analytical samples were collected from the location showing the highest PIE) reading. The cooler was delivered to North Creek Analytical's Bothell Lab. Samples were shipped,under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached Sample Collection: Sample PID Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI 14 -1 -1 42.7 Yes 250 B3H0655 -01 SPI 14 -1 -2 25.5 SPI 14 -2 -6 ;19.0 RL 4.00. -- --=— SPI 14 -1 -3 20.7 RL;.25.0____: SPI 14 -2 -4 152 SPI 14 -2 -5 352 SPI 14 -2 -6 440 Yes 255 B3H0655 -02 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, DRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from North Creek Analytical and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non - detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location DRO (100 mg /kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg /kg) GRO (50 mg /kg) Xylene (69 mg /kg) RRO (2000mg /kg) SPI 14 -1 -1 - 29_2_RL 4.00'_ �_ = -ND -RL "2.73 ' 44.8- _RL2'S:0 -_� SPI 14 -2 -6 ;19.0 RL 4.00. -- --=— - N-D-RL- -2;31 - -- - -- --- RL;.25.0____: Volatile Results Sample ID Location Benzene (0.02 mg /kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg /kg) Toluene (4.8 "mg /kg) Xylene (69 mg /kg) SPI 14 -1 -1 ;ND DRL 0:0109- - ND' RL 0 :0273 - NI] ..RL 0_02731_ ND RL0.0546_ti SPI 14 -2 -6 .ND .RL 0.:00925__ _ND _RL 0 023 I- : JNIIAL_0.023 °1"� -ND--RE-:0-:04-62--; 2 Sample nomenclature: Example: SPI 15 -2 -3 -6 SPI - for Soil Processing, 15 - for the Job, #, 2 - represents a 500 ton quantity, 3 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 6 - for sample location of a field screening. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results from North Creek Analytical. Job 14 Stkp 1 & 2 meet AbEC cleanup levels for DRO, RRO, GRO and BTEX and are ready for review and disposal instructions by ADEC. Jeannie Fabiano Alaska TestLab 9, ,4LCG4 -7, Kodiak Alaska 3 Post Treatment Sampling and, Analysis Report A30226 Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274 -3000 AUG ECIEEIVE 11 - 8 2003 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Stockpile Number: [job _ #_11._Stkp 1_( 50T ),_Stkp_2_(75T):_StkpL3_(100T} Tonnage: 225 tons Ending Treatment Date: 7 -30 -03 Sampled By: J. Fabiano Origination- of- Soii:- Chugach_Management =^Spruce Cape_;` Adec Spill # 2001- 2501 -11451 This report outlines the findings of third party sampling. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for each of the treated soil stockpiles as directed by the Operations plan for a new client. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. The samples were f ield screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. Three analytical sample were collected, one from each stockpile from the location showing the highest PID reading. The cooler was delivered to North Creek Analytical's field lab in Kodiak. (ADEC Certification UST -058). Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. One analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. The 500 -ton stockpiles will be separated into 3 individual stockpiles, which aid in sampling and will carry the same number. 1 Sample Collection: Sample PJD Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI 11 -1 -1 4.1 SPI 11 -2 -3 ND__ RL 1.0.0:, ND-RI.; 0.714; (-39.8* SPI 11 -1 -2 504 Yes 9 :20 M307021 -01 SPI 11 -1 -3 21.9 ND- R - 0.0347 NND r RU0 0347 — ND_RL...0.0693 SPI 11 -2 -1 6.6 SPI 11 -2 -2 19.7 SPI11 -2 -3 22.5 Yes 9 :25 M307021 -02 SPI 11 -3 -1 326 Yes 9:30 M307021 -03 SPI 11 -3 -2 41.8 SPI 11 -3 -3 294 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, DRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from North Creek Analytical and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non- detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location ; DROP; 1100 mg/kg) i GRO (50 mg/kg) RR ©t (2000mg/kg) ND RL 12:5 SPI 11 -1 -2 ND RL_10.0____ ND_RL_0.992 -- SPI 11 -2 -3 ND__ RL 1.0.0:, ND-RI.; 0.714; (-39.8* RI 12.5 SPI 11 -3 -1 ND RL 110.0 ND RI, 0 :8'67 ND_RL -12.5 Volatile Results • Sample ID Location Benzene .', (0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl.Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) Xylene (69 mg/kg) SPI 11 -1 -2 ND ,RL�0.007.93 _,. N3D�R-0:03977- NT}: -RL 0'.0_39.7- ND RL 0.0793' - SPI 11 -2 -3 \ND-- RL- 0;0051 1_L _ _ND RL II :0286`" ND RI, 0.0286 -- -ND RL; 0.0571 SPI 11 -3 -1 _.0.00832 RI, 0:00693- ND- R - 0.0347 NND r RU0 0347 — ND_RL...0.0693 2 Sample nomenclature: Example: SPI 15-2-3-6 SPI - for Soil Processing, 15 - for the Job #, 2 - represents a 500 ton quantity, 3 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 6 - for sample location of a field screening. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results from North Creek Analytical. Job #11 Stockpiles 1, 2 & 3 meet ADEC cleanup levels for DRO, RRO, GRO and BTEX and are ready for review by ADEC. Jeannie Fabian() Alaska TestLab Kodiak Alaska Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report A30226 Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274 -3000 Stockpile Number: Job #8 Stkp 7 Tonnage: 50 Tons Ending Treatment Date: 7 -14 -03 Sampled By: J. Fabiano Origination of Soil: Crowser ASD =D— ADEC spill #1988-2509-15070 __ This report outlines the findings of third party sampling. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for each of the treated soil stockpile as directed by the Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. Nine samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. One analytical sample was collected from the location showing the highest PID reading. The cooler was delivered to North Creek Analytical's field lab in Kodiak. (ADEC Certification UST -058). Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. One analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. The 500 - ton stockpiles will be separated into 3 individual stockpiles, which aid in sampling and will carry the same number. 1 5/7/ Sample Collection: Sample HD Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI 8-7 1-1 1465 405— - -125 --- _ NDRLb.Q4ZjNRLO852J SPI 8-7 1-2 673 SPI 8-7 1-3 305 SPI 8-7 2-4 2000 Yes 11:30 M307013 SPI 8-7 2-5 1575 SPI 8-7 2-6 383 SPI 8-7 3-7 860 SPI 8-7 3-8 10.8 SPI 8-7 3-9 74.8 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, bRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from North Creek Analytical and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non-detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location DRO (100 niWkg) GRO (50 mg/kg) RRO (2000mg/kg) Xylene (69 mg/kg) - ND RL 1.06- - 405— - -125 --- _ NDRLb.Q4ZjNRLO852J Volatile Results Sample ID Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) _ _ Ethyl Benzene __(5ing/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) Xylene (69 mg/kg) SPI-87_2-4 ND-RI-A-00852 - -Na-RL•0.0426 - — NDRLb.Q4ZjNRLO852J 2 Sample nomenclature: Example: SPI15 -2 -3 -6 SPI - for Soil Processing, 15 - for the Job #, 2 - represents a 500 ton quantity, 3 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 6 - for sample location of a field screening. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results from North Creek Analytical. Job #8 Stkp 7 meets ADEC cleanup levels for DRO, RRO, GRO and BTEX and is ready for review by ADEC. Jeannie Fabiano Alaska TestLab Kodiak Alaska Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report A30226 Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274 -3000 Stockpile Number: Job 8 -8 & Job 10 -1 Tonnage: 123.0 (54261.89 Tons Respectively Ending Treatment bate: 7 -15 -03 Sampled By: J. Fabian() Origination of Soil: Har_.t:Crowser-ASD=D and A5b= 2_respectively— ADEC spill #1988 - 2509 -15070 This report outlines the findings of third party sampling. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for each treated soil stockpile as directed by the Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. Six samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. Two analytical samples were collected from the locations showing the highest PID reading. One from each pile. The cooler was delivered to North Creek Analytical's field lab in Kodiak. (AMC Certification UST -058). Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. 1 .5P1 Sample Collection: Sample PID Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI 8-8-1 2000 pk Yes 425 M307014-01 SPI 8-8-2 411 -sPr-ro:r47---7- -- -31.3 RI.: 10-.0 SPI 8-8-3 124 -ND' RL- .07_8.1__ __ - - - -3-1-3-- RL--12.-5-----: SPI 10-1-1 53.1 Yes 430 M307014-02 SPI 10-1-2 48.5 SPI 10-1-3 5.6 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, DRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from North Creek Analytical and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non-detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location DRO (100 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene _(4.8mg/kg)__. __ _ GRO (50 mg/kg) RRO (2000mg/kg) 173 RL 12.5 SP-I-8-8-1 - .... .18.4 Ri,.10.0 --ND-RL 0,100 1 ND .RL 1.25_ ..... . _ -sPr-ro:r47---7- -- -31.3 RI.: 10-.0 . ' - .-- -ND' RL- .07_8.1__ __ - - - -3-1-3-- RL--12.-5-----: latile Results Sample ID Location Benzene _ (O.02_mg/kg)_ _ _ Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene _(4.8mg/kg)__. __ _ Xylene (69 mg/kg) _ SPI 8-8-1 -- -ND- RL 0.0100- - ND RL 0.050L.. ._ -- -,-.-. :.0.050.1_-- - -- --ND-RL 0,100 SPI 10-1=1— :ND RL0625 :,:.. IND _RL 0.03-12- - - - ND -RL--0:0501- '-------Na_RL_ 0,015 2 Sample nomenclature: Example: SP' 15-2-3-6 SPI - for Soil Processing, 15 - for the Job #, 2 - represents a 500 ton quantity, 3 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 6 - for sample location of a field screening. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results from North Creek Analytical. Job 8 Stkp 8 and Job 10 Stkp 1 meet ADEC clean up levels for GRO, RRO, DRO and BTEX and are ready for review by ADEC. Jeannie Fabiano Alaska TestLab Kodiak Alaska Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report A30226 Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274 -3000 TVECIEEIVIE 1 AUG - 8 2003 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Stockpile Number; ;Job ##9 Stkp 5 (15961),;Stkp_6__ _79.9511, Stkp_7-(12:.96T) Tonnage: '10887 Tans Ending Treatment bate: 7 -10 -03 Sampled By: J. Fabiano Origination of Soil:7Jdaiiiiii ,Chiriiak DPU 5tkp -9=5; 9 ;7,-- Buskin 1151-2 - -5tkp 9 :6_2 AbEC spill #46504 This report outlines the findings of third party sampling. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for the treated soil stockpile as directed by the Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. The samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. Three analytical samples were collected from the location showing the highest PIb reading. The cooler was delivered to North Creek Analytical's field lab in Kodiak. (AbEC Certification UST -058). Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. One analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. The 500 - ton stockpiles will be separated into 3 individual stockpiles, which aid in sampling and will carry the same number. Sample Collection: Sample PID Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI 9 -5 -1 846 4 24.4 RL 10.0_. __ , ...ND- RL_.1..- 1.1__.— — SPI 9 -5 -2 702 SPI 9 -7 -3 =ND- RL'0 :0529 L -- - -:40:4 -RL- -10.0- _ _ - -_ SPI 9 -5 -3 2000 pk Yes 945 M307010 -01 SPI 9 -7 -1 1777 -_ - - ' _21- .5 -RL-: 1 -2 -5 -f SPI 9 -7 -2 1050 SPI 9 -7 -3 2000 pk Yes 950 M307010 -02 SPI 9 -6 -1 830 SPI 9 -6 -2 802 SPI 9-6-3 884 Yes 955 M307010 -03 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, DRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as RTEX by EPA method 80216. The following results were obtained from North Creek Analytical and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non-detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location Benzene "(0.02 mg/kg) DRO (100 mg/kg) GRO (50 mg/kg) Xylene 169. mg/kg)_ ____.. RRO (2000mg/kg) _ SPI 9 -5 -3 4 24.4 RL 10.0_. __ , ...ND- RL_.1..- 1.1__.— — SPI 9 -7 -3 43.3 RL 12.5j SPI 9 -7 -3 =ND- RL'0 :0529 L -- - -:40:4 -RL- -10.0- _ _ - -_ _ND__RL_L.32- -- - .__.- - - -- - -27 7 RL__1 -2:5 _.- SPI 9 -6 -3 ND RL; 0.0949 _4.1.5- RL.-_1.0.0___- ND -RL; 1:1"9- - - - - -_ - - ' _21- .5 -RL-: 1 -2 -5 -f Volatile Results Sample ID Location Benzene "(0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) Xylene 169. mg/kg)_ ____.. SPI 9 -5 -3'; _ND RL 0700891, _ ND RL _0.0446 ND RL 0.044-6__._ -ND-RL-0708,9_1, SPI 9 -7 -3 -0 ;0148 RL- 0:01"06-- ND -RL-0. 0529 ---- =ND- RL'0 :0529 L -- - „ID _G._ .06-2' SPI 9 -6 -3, . ND-- RL20.00949 ' ND RL 0;0474. ND_RL_0..04.7_4 , ND RL; 0.0949 2 Sample nomenclature: Example: 5P1 15 -2 -3 -6 SPI - for Soil Processing, 15 - for the Job #, 2 - represents a 500 ton quantity, 3 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 6 - for sample location of a field screening. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results from North Creek Analytical. Job #9 Stkp 5,7 and 6 meet AbEC cleanup levels for GRO, DRO, RRO and BTEX and are ready for review by ADEC. Jeannie Fabian() Alaska TestLab Kodiak Alaska 3 Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility A30226 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274 -3000 Stockpile Number: `Job #9 Stkp _717 Tonnage: 261.78 tons Ending Treatment Date: 7 -2 -03 Sampled By: J. Fabiano Origination of Soil: Jacobs ADA Item #4_ i ADEC spill # 30504 AUG - 8 2003 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT This report outlines the findings of third party sampling. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for each of the treated soil stockpile as directed by the Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. The samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. One analytical sample was collected from the location showing the highest PID reading. The cooler was delivered to North Creek Analytical's field lab in Kodiak. (ADEC Certification UST -058). Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. One analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. The 500 - ton stockpiles will be separated into 3 individual stockpiles, which aid in sampling and will carry the same number. Sample Collection: Sample PID Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI 9-4 1 -1 16.0 ND -RI.; 0.0491 - -NDmRI:0- 0491:— - ND- RL-0:0981~' SPI 9 -4 1 -2 33.0 SPI 9-4 1 -3 33,3 SPI 9 -4 2 -4 21.9 SPI 9 -4 2 -5 40.3 Yes 1000 M307005 SPI 9 -4 2 -6 34.5 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, DRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from North Creek Analytical and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non - detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample rD Location DRO (100 mg/kg) GRO (50 mg/kg) RRO (2000mg/kg) 47.3aRLT12 -5 - - -i SPI 9 -4 2 -5 ND_RL_10.0__ _ - -- ..ND a_1 -.23 ND -RI.; 0.0491 - -NDmRI:0- 0491:— - ND- RL-0:0981~' Volatile Results Sample ID Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) Xylene (69 mg/kg) SPI 9-4 2 -5 ';ND..RL_0.0098�1- -- ND -RI.; 0.0491 - -NDmRI:0- 0491:— - ND- RL-0:0981~' 2 Sample nomenclature: Example: 5PI15 -2 -3 -6 SPI - for Soil Processing, 15 - for the Job #, 2 - represents a 500 ton quantity, 3 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 6 - for sample location of a field screening. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results from North Creek Analytical. Job #9 Stkp 4 meets ADEC cleanup levels for GRO, DRO, RRO and BTEX and is ready for review by AMC. Jeannie Fabiano Alaska TestLab Kodiak Alaska Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility A30226 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274 -3000 Stockpile Number: #8 5ti<p b Tonnage: 165.0 Tons Ending Treatment Date: 7 -5 -03 Sampled By: J. Fabiano Origination of Soil: Hart ADEC spill # 1988 -2509 -15070 WCEEIVE �1 AUG - 8 2003 .1] COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT This report outlines the findings of third party sampling. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for the treated soil stockpile as directed by the Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. The samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. One analytical sample was collected from the location showing the highest PID reading. The cooler was delivered to North Creek Analytical's field lab in Kodiak. (ADEC Certification UST -058). Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. One analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. The 500 -ton stockpiles will be separated into 3 individual stockpiles, which aid in sampling and will carry the same number. 1 Sample Collection: Sample PID Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI 8 -6 -1 10.6 - ND-- RL_0.0420 - NI RL 0.0420 -__ ND RL 0.0841__x' SPI 8 -6 -2 11.7 SPI 8-6-3 17.7 Yes 1005 M307006 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, DRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from North Creek Analytical, and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non - detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location DRO (100 mg/kg) GRO (50 mg/kg) RRO (2000mg/kg) ._59.2 RL 12.5 i SPI 8 -6 -3 - ND- RL10.0________. _ND. RL..1..05 — - ND-- RL_0.0420 - NI RL 0.0420 -__ ND RL 0.0841__x' Volatile Results Sample ID Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) Xylene (69 mg/kg) SPI 8 -6 -3 ,ND- 0.00841 - - ND-- RL_0.0420 - NI RL 0.0420 -__ ND RL 0.0841__x' 2 Sample nomenclature: Example: SPI 15-2-3-6 SPI - for Soil Processing, 15 - for the Job #, 2 - represents a 500 ton quantity, 3 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 6 - for sample location of a field screening. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results from North Creek Analytical. Job #8 Stkp 6 meets ADEC cleanup levels for GRO, DRO, RRO and BTEX and is ready for review by ADEC. Jeannie Fabian() 9 Alaska TestLab Kodiak Alaska 7/A Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility WO# A30226 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274 -3000 Stockpile Number: Job ##3_stkp_61 Tonnage: 137.87 Ending Treatment Date: 7 -7 -03 Sampled By: J. Fabiano Origination of,;Soil_Hart Crowser SAA =04_. ADEC spill # 1991- 2501 -17251 .SPI This report outlines the findings of third party sampling. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for the treated soil stockpile as directed by the Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. The samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. One analytical sample was collected from the location showing the highest PID reading. The cooler was delivered to North Creek Analytical's field lab in .Kodiak. (ADEC Certification UST -058). Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. One analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. The 500 -ton stockpiles will be separated into 3 individual stockpiles, which aid in sampling and will carry the same number. 1 Sample Collection: Sample PID Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI 3-6-1 11.7 0-.0474-- 1■ID RL_0.0414__ ___ ND- RI:0:094T SPI 3-6-2 56.4 Yes 1010 M307007 SPI 3-6-3 24.2 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, MO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021. The following results were obtained from North Creek Analytical and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non-detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PCIL. indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location DRO (100 mg/kg) GRO (50 mg/kg) RRO (2000mg/kg) SPI 3-6-2 720-.5 Rr-ro:o---- - NWRI:1718---- —N1YRL-1275----- 0-.0474-- 1■ID RL_0.0414__ ___ ND- RI:0:094T Volatile Results Sample ID Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) Xylene (69 mg/kg) SPI 3-6-2 \ND _RL.0.00947D-RL 0-.0474-- 1■ID RL_0.0414__ ___ ND- RI:0:094T 2 Sample nomenclature: Example: SPI 15-2-3-6 SPI - for Soil Processing,15 - for the Job #, 2 - represents a 500 ton quantity, 3 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 6 - for sample location of a field screening. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical . results from North Creek Analytical. Job #3 Stkp 6 meets ADEC cleanup levels for GRO, DRO, RRO and BTEX and is ready for review by ADEC. Jeannie Fabiano Alaska TestLab Kodiak Alaska 7-/ /„A VENN% • Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report WO# A30226 5011 Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274-3000 Stockpile Number:q6b—#_815-fi4:5 Tonnage: 391 Tons Ending Treatment bate: 6-30-03 Sampled By: J. Fabiano _ OFiginatioriof-Soil:-Hart-Crowser-Ab5-D-1 AbEC spill # 1988-2509-15070 0 ECEIIVE AUG 8 2003 11 a ELOPMENT DEPARTMENT This report outlines the findings of third party sampling. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for each of the treated soil stockpile as directed by the Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. The samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. One analytical sample was collected from the location showing the highest PID reading. The cooler was delivered to North Creek Analytical's field lab in Kodiak. (AbEC Certification U5T-058). Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. One analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. The 500- ton stockpiles will be separated into 3 individual stockpiles, which aid in sampling and will carry the same number. ciP/ Sample nomenclature: Example: SPI 15 -2 -3 -6 SPI - for Soil Processing, 15 - for the Job #, 2 - represents a 500 ton quantity, 3 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 6 - for sample location of a field screening. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results from North Creek Analytical. Job #8 Stkp 5 meets ADEC cleanup levels for DRO,.GRO, RRO and BTEX and is ready for review by ADEC for, instructions. Jeannie Fabian() Alaska TestLab Kodiak Alaska 3 Sample Collection: Sample PID Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab lD SPI 8-5 1-1 0.0 --ND-R170-.-0392------ -ND_RL 0.078$ SPI 8-5 1-2 10.0 SPI 8-5 1-3 103 SPI 8-5 2-4 11.2 SPI 8-5 2-5 16.7 SPI 8-5 2-6 6.4 SPI 8-5 3-7 134 Yes 4:40 M307001 SPI 8-5 3-8 60.2 SPI 8-5 3-9 0.0 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, DRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from North Creek Analytical and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non-detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location DRO (100 mg/kg) GRO (50 mg/kg) RRO (2000mg/kg) __.7_1..7._:T.C12..53 Xylene (69 mg/kg) -ND-RL40.0___._ —_ _.0.9.Y.111S = --ND-R170-.-0392------ -ND_RL 0.078$ Volatile Results Sample ID Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) _ Xylene (69 mg/kg) SPI 8-5 3-7 ' RI010-0783—N1/...RL.0.03_92----- --ND-R170-.-0392------ -ND_RL 0.078$ 2 • _ SPA Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report WO# A30226 Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274 -3000 lrECEIVIE AUG - 8 2003 1]; COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Stockpile Number: Job #9 Stkp 1 (50ton) Stkp 2 (75 tons Tonnage: 225 Tons Ending Treatment Date: 6 -30 -03 Sampled By: J. Fabiano LOrigin`dtion of= Sai.lJacobs.-= Item- #4-AbA+ ADEC spill # 30504 kp 3 (100tons) This report outlines the findings of third party sampling. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for each of the treated soil stockpile as directed by the Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. The samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. Three analytical samples were collected from the location showing the highest PID reading. The cooler was delivered to North Creek Analytical's field lab in Kodiak. (ADEC Certification UST - 058). Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. One analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. The 500 -ton stockpiles will be separated into 3 individual stockpiles, which aid in sampling and will carry the same number. 1 Sample Collection: Sample HD Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI 9-1-1 146 tSPI_9_72=5.______ ND RL-10:0--- ---71----- -- NDRLT3U ___-- --- SPI 9-1-2 1,5 ND --RL-1-0.0_ ND'itt-r1-1------- -34 .2-RIL-1275-. SPI 9-1-3 157 Yes 4:45 M307002-01 SPI 9-2-4 150 SPI 9-2-5 161 Yes 4:50 M307002-02 SPI 9-2-6 60.2 SPI 9-3-7 141 SPI 9-3-8 111 SPI 9-3-9 247 Yes 4:55 M307002-03 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, DRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from North Creek Analytical and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non-detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location DRO (100 mg/kg) GRO (50 mg/kg) RRO (2000mg/kg) Xylene (69 ing/kg) SPI 9-1-3 NDRL 0.60962-- tSPI_9_72=5.______ ND RL-10:0--- ---71----- -- NDRLT3U ___-- --- --ND ---RL--1-275-- SPI 9-3-9 ND --RL-1-0.0_ ND'itt-r1-1------- -34 .2-RIL-1275-. Volatile Results Sample ID Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) Xylene (69 ing/kg) SPI 9-1-3 NDRL 0.60962-- --ND-RI:0:048r ---- -ND- -0048.4_7_ - — -RL70.-09-62 SPI 9-2-5 ..1_D__RL-0:0-105-- -ND_RL _Q.0524 -ND RIL-0-.0524*----- - -ND- RL 0.1057 SPI 9-3-9 i -ND -It1:0.008_85_ ND RE; 0042_ _ND_AL 0.044.2. - RLiL0885 2 Sample nomenclature: Example: SPI15 -2 -3 -6 SPI - for Soil Processing, 15 - for the Job #, 2 - represents a 500 ton quantity, 3 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 6 - for sample location of a field screening. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results from North Creek 'Analytical. Job #9 Stkp 1, Stkp 2 and Stkp 3 meet ADEC cleanup levels for GRO, DRO, RRO and BTEX and is ready for review by ADEC for instructions. Jeannie Fabiano Alaska TestLab Kodiak Alaska Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274 -3000 Stockpile Number: Job_ #3- Stkp -# 5 Tonnage: 350.59 Tons Ending Treatment bate: 6 -17 -03 Sampled By: J. Fabiano _ Origination of Soil: (Hart__Cr-owser) USCG SAA -04 -- ADEC Spill # 1991 - 2501 -17251 This report outlines the findings of third party sampling. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for each the treated soil stockpile that comprises this stockpile as directed by the Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. 5ix samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. One analytical sample was collected from the location showing the highest PID reading. The cooler was delivered to North Creek Analytical's field lab in Kodiak. (ADEC Certification UST -058). Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. One analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. The 500 -ton stockpiles will be separated into 3 individual stockpiles, which aid in sampling and will carry the same number. 1 Sample Collection: Sample PID Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI 3-5 1-1 0.0 ': ND Rt Q.0491 RL 0,049f , SPI 3-5 1-2 0.0 SPI 3-5 1-3 0.0 SPI 3-5 2-4 0.6 SPI 3-5 2-5 0.8 SPI 3-5 2-6 10.4 Yes 9:35 M306012-01 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, bRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from North Creek Analytical and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non-detect results are indicated by Nb and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location DRO- (100 mg/kg) GRO (50 mg/kg) RRO (2000mg/kg) , _ ...._ L31.1 RL 12:5 SPI 3-5 2-6 42.9 _0.0„: ' _ND_RI.,:l.2j - ': ND Rt Q.0491 RL 0,049f 1 ND R1.4.0983: Volatile Results Sample ID Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) _._ Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) Xylene (69 mg/kg) SPI 3-5 2-6 ' ND RI..„0.00983 ': ND Rt Q.0491 RL 0,049f 1 ND R1.4.0983: 2 Sample nomenclature: Example: SPI 15-2-3-6 SPI - for Soil Processing, 15 - for the Job #, 2 - represents a 500 ton quantity, 3 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 6 - for sample location of a field screening. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results from North Creek Analytical. Job #3, Stkp 5 meets AbEC cleanup levels for GRO, DRO, RRO and BTEX and is ready for review by ADEC. Jeannie Fabiano Alaska TestLab Kodiak Alaska Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274 -3000 Stockpile Number: Job_ #8 Stkp 1 _(50 tons) and 2- (75 tons) Tonnage: 152 tons Ending Treatment Date: 6-18 -03 Sampled By: J. Fabiano Origination of Soil: Hart_Crowser_(ADS -D) ADEC spill #1988 - 2509 -15070 This report outlines the findings of third party sampling. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for each treated soil stockpile as directed by the Operations plan for client start -up. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. Six samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. Two analytical samples were collected from the locations showing the highest PID reading. The cooler was delivered to North Creek Analytical's field lab in Kodiak. (ADEC Certification UST -058). Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. 1 Sample Collection: Sample PID Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI 8 -1-4 9.5 194.2‘112L-... 2 2.5: SPI 8 -2 -1 18_.4_ . _ 10.0 SPI 8 -1 -5 9.2 sND RL-_0.0.45.2 ND_RL_0 -.0452. ND RI,- 0:0905 -7! SPI8 -1 -6 17.6 Yes 9:40 M306013 -01 SPI 8-2-1 16.2 Yes 9:45 M306013 -02 SPI 8 -2 -2 0.1 SPI 8 -2 -3 14.5 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, DRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from North Creek Analytical and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non - detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location DRO (100 mg/kg) GRO (50 mg/kg) RRO (2000mg/kg) SPI 8 -1 -6 .25.2_ , 10.Q_ ,ND wRI,1-. 27. 194.2‘112L-... 2 2.5: SPI 8 -2 -1 18_.4_ . _ 10.0 LND , RL1:13 L6.9.9 RL f S sND RL-_0.0.45.2 ND_RL_0 -.0452. ND RI,- 0:0905 -7! Volatile Results Sample ID Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) Xylene (69 mg/kg) SPI 8 -1 -6 ND_RL 0..0101 NDRL 0.0507 ND_RL_0.0507 , ND RL. 0.1:01 SPI 8-2-1 ND RL_0.00905 sND RL-_0.0.45.2 ND_RL_0 -.0452. ND RI,- 0:0905 -7! 2 Sample nomenclature: Example: SPI15 -2 -3 -6 SPI for Soil Processing, 15 - for the Job #, 2 - represents a 500 ton quantity, 3 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 6 - for sample location of a field screening. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results from North Creek Analytical. Job #8 Stkp 1 and 2 meet AMC cleanup levels for GRO, DRO, RRO and BTEX and is ready for review by AMC. Jeannie Fabiano Alaska TestLab Kodiak Alaska SPA Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274 -3000 Stockpile Number: b #7__S_tkp 1-- (50-ton)_and_Stkp_ #2 ( balance) Tonnage: 77.53 Tons Ending Treatment Date: 6 -10 -03 Sampled By: J. Fabiano Origination of7SoILAnder-son Construction ADEC spill # 01249902701 This report outlines the findings of third party sampling. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for each of the treated soil stockpiles as directed by the Operations plan. Six sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. The samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. One analytical sample was collected from each pile with the location showing the highest PID reading. The cooler was delivered to North Creek Analytical's field lab in Kodiak. (ADEC Certification UST -058). Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. One analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. Sample Collection: Sample PID Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI 7-1-1 4.2 SPI 7-2-5 tDRL 10.0 'ND- RL 1.43 SPI 7-1-2 23.6 Yes 14:30 M306010-01 SPI 7-1-3 3.5 SPI 7-2-4 3.2 SPI 7-2-5 6.8 Yes 14:45 M306010-02 SPI 7-2-6 3.9 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, bRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from North Creek Analytical and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non-detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location DRO (100 mg/kg) GRO (50 mg/kg) RRO (2000mg/kg) Nn-RL 12.5 SPI 7-1-2 -ND-RL 10.0 N. RL 1.19 SPI 7-2-5 tDRL 10.0 'ND- RL 1.43 ND - -RL--12.5 ,ND- RL 0,0114 NIRL 0.0571 ma RL 0.0571 kND_ 0.114 Volatile Results Sample 11) Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) Xylene (69 mg/kg) SPI 7-1-2 ND-,RL 0.00952 LND_ _RL 0.0476 -ND._RL 0.0476 , ND- RL 0.0952 SPI 7-2-5 ,ND- RL 0,0114 NIRL 0.0571 ma RL 0.0571 kND_ 0.114 2 Sample nomenclature: Example: SPI 15-2-3-6 SP' - for Soil Processing, 15 - for the Job #, 2 - represents a 500 ton quantity, 3 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 6 - for sample location of a field screening. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined results from North Creek Analytical. h the confirmatory analytical Job #7 Stkp piles #1 & 2 meet ADEC cleanup levels for GRO, RRO, DRO and BTEX. Jeannie Fabiano Alaska TestLab Kodiak Alaska 3 Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274 -3000 Stockpile Number: Job #5, Stkp # 1 (50T), #2(75T), #3(100T), #4 (500T), Tonnage: 725 Tons Ending Treatment Date: 5 -28 -03 Sampled By: J. Fabidno _ Origination of LSoil;_Chugach- Management ADEC Spill # 1988- 2509 -15070 This report outlines the findings of third party sampling. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for the treated soil stockpile as directed by the Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. The samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. One analytical sample was collected from the location showing the highest PID reading. The cooler was delivered to North Creek Analytical's field lab in Kodiak. (ADEC Certification UST -058). Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. One analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. The 500 -ton stockpiles will be separated into 3 individual stockpiles, which aid in sampling and will carry the same number. For initial start up the soils were treated in smaller quantities, 50,75 and 100 tons. These three smaller stockpiles were treated and tested prior to the successive 500 tons there after. 1 Sample Collection: Sample PID Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI 5 -1 -1 0.2 SPI 5 -1 -2 0.0 SPI 5-1-3 6.0 Yes 4:05 M305023 -01 SPI 5-2-4R 69.0 Yes 4:15 P3E0864 -02 SPI 5 -2 -5 22.4 SPI 5 -2 -6 36.2 SPI 5 -3 -1 40.5 SPI 5-3-2 89.0 Yes 4:20 P3E0864 -02 SPI 5 -3 -3 13.0 SPI 5 -4 -1 -4 51.0 SPI 5-4-1-5 64.3 Yes 4:25 P3E0864 -03 SPI 5 -4 -1 -6 63 SPI 5 -4 -2 -7 51 SPI 5 -4 -2 -8 64 SPI 5 -4 -2 -9 53 SPI 5- 4 -3 -10 58 SPI 5- 4 -3 -11 47 SPI 5- 4 -3 -12 51 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, DRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from North Creek Analytical and were compared to the required 2 cleanup level. Non-detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location DRO (100 mg/kg) GRO (50 mg/kg) RRO (2000mg/kg) ',..91.6 RL 12.5 SPI 5-1-3 C:23.2 RL-10 ..,ND RL 0.964 SPI 5-2-4R ND RI3 25.0 7ND __RL 2.9 c28,5 RL 50.0 SPI 5-3-2 ND_ RL=25.0 ND-AL 3.41 J1 RL 50.0 SPI 5-4-1-5 ND RL 25.0 _ND RL 2.41 174:3 RU. 50.0 CND AL 0.0852 SPI 5-4-1-5 -ND 'RL 0.0120 'ND RL 0.0601 Volatile Results Sample ID Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) Xylene (69 mg/kg) SPI 5-1-3 - NDRL 0.00771 ND RL 0.0386 ND RL 0.0386 :ND-RL 0.0771 SPI 5-2-4R ND_ RL 0.0145 rND RL 0.0726 ' ND RL 0.0726 ND_RL 0.0726 SPI 5-3-2 ND-RL 0.0170 ND_RL 0.0852 ND RL 00852 CND AL 0.0852 SPI 5-4-1-5 -ND 'RL 0.0120 'ND RL 0.0601 ' 1D RL 0.0601 'ND .RL 0.0601 Sample nomenclature: Example: SPI 15-2-3-6 SPI - for Soil Processing, 15 - for the Job #, 2 - represents a 500 ton quantity, 3 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 6 - for sample location of a field screening. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. 3 Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results from North Creek Analytical. These first 4 stockpiles of treated soils for Job #5, Chugach management, meet AbEC cleanup levels for GRO., DRO, RRO and BTEX and are ready for review by AbEC. Jeannie Fabiano Alaska TestLab Kodiak Alaska 4 Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274 -3000 Stockpile Number: Job #53t19 5, Tonnage: 270 tons Ending Treatment bate: 5 -28 -03 Sampled By: J. Fabiano Origination of` Soil:Chugach- Management ADEC spill # 1988 - 2509 -15070 This report outlines the findings of third party sampling. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for each of the treated soil stockpile as directed by the Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. Six samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. One analytical sample was collected from the location showing the highest PID reading. The cooler was delivered to North Creek Analytical's field lab in Kodiak. (ADEC Certification UST -058). Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. One analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. The 500 - ton stockpiles will be separated into 3 individual stockpiles, which aid in sampling and will carry the same number. Sample Collection: Sample PID Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI 5-5 1-1 150 Yes 1625 M305026-01 SPI 5-5 1-2 70 SPI 5-5 1-3 57.1 SPI 5-5 2-4 45.6 SPI 5-5 2-5 45.8 SPI 5-5 2-6 47.0 58.0 47.0 Anal51.0ytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, DRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from North Creek Analytical and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non-detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location DRO (100 mg/kg) GRO (50 mg/kg) RRO (2000ing/kg) 36.6 RL 1.2.5 SPI 5-5 1-1 ',.ND.--ItL 10.0 'ND- -131, 1.26 'ND _RL' 0.0503 . RL,:0.0503 'ND-- RL 0.101 Volatile Results Sample ID Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) Xylene (69 mg/kg) SPI 5-5 1-1 ',ND- RL 0.0101 'ND _RL' 0.0503 . RL,:0.0503 'ND-- RL 0.101 2 Sample nomenclature: Example: 5131 15-2-3-6 SPI - for Soil Processing, 15 - for the Job #, 2 - represents a 500 ton quantity, 3 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 6 - for sample location of a field screening. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results from North Creek Analytical. This completes Job #5 for SPI. These soils stated in this report meet ADEC cleanup levels for GRO, DRO, RRO and BTEX and are ready for review by ADEC. Jeannie Fabiano Alaska Test Lab Kodiak Alaska FROM : Carver Geologic Kodiak Alaska FAX NO. : 907 487 4002 Jan. 28 2003 03:00PM P1 lovV1 Utr Gtli VJ 14. 4.1 reLt., LV'JrUy7 All WIU tt1 4Mr 4UL'11 l.: MEMORANDUM State of Alaska ro Bob Cannone Compliance Supervisor Air Permits Program Sim Baumgartner Construction Permits Supervisor Air Permits Program John Kajdan Environmental Engineering Assistant I Air Permits Program artment of Environmental Conservation ' Division of Air & Water Quality rare: December 11, 2002 El/ENO: X -113 MOM: 465 -5100 FAX 465 -5129 ECEEIVE JAN 2 9 2003 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT susn3cr: Modeling BEI and SPI concurrent operations in Kodiak. In response to public concern, the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (the, Department).has performed ambient air quality modeling of adjacent asphalt and soil remediation operations. The facilities are operating on contiguous work sites in a gravel pi- located off Sergeant's Road near Kodiak, Alaska. The asphalt plant, owned by Brechan Enterprises Inc, (BEI), and the soil remediation unit, owned by Soil Processing Inc. (SPI), are currently authorized to operate under several general permits. BFI is operating their AESCO/MADSEN asphalt plant under general permit 332GP301. Particulate metier emissions from the asphalt plant are controlled by a wet scrubber. BEI is also operating an aggregate dryer as part of their asphalt operations. BEI is operating a Cedar Rapids 8828 aggregate drying drum under a separate GP3 general permit than the AESCO/MADSEN asphalt plant. Particulate matter emissions from BFI's aggregate dryer are controlled by a baghouse. SPI is operating a •LPG fired soil remediatinn'unir under 0P4 Permit to Operate No, AA000204. Particulate matter emissions from the soil remediation unit are controlled by a wet venturi scrubber. The general permits included screening level modeling analyses of generic facilities. However, those analyses did not assess the impacts of multiple facilities operating on sites located next to each other. There are in effect three facilities operating within the ambient boundary assumed for one facility in the modeling analyses used for the general permits. The following analysis has been performed to take into consideration concurrent operations of BFI's asphalt plant and additional aggregate dtye: with SPI's soil remediation onit. Based on the following analysts. the Depafinent has determined Char the operations have a reasonable likelihood of causing or significantly contributing to ambient air quality concentrations exceeding the National ,ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and the Class 11 maximum allowable increases (increments) for both PMrc and S 2.t I The NAAQS are listed under 18 ARC 50.010. Increments are listed under 18 r AC 50.020 Table -3 • Maxi Allowable Increaob." FROM : Carver Geologic Kodiak Alaska FAX N0. : 907 487 4002 Ulr L(1) UJ 111. .)(1 )'Cl l ..IJt1 '.10:1 till emu Hatej weall6, Jan. 28 2003 03:01PM P2 Qa1UL BEU5Pl Concuuent Operations - 2 - December 11, 2002 Modeling Revive . Modeling Approach The analyses included the facilities' impacts on ambient concentrations of both particulate matter with aerodynanro diameter less than 10 microns (PMuo) and S02, The PMtt..anaiysis considered the combined impacts of the BEI and SPI facilities. The SO2 analysis considered only the impacts of BEI's aggregate dryer and asphalt plant. SO, emissions from SDI's soil remediation unit are negligible because the unit's dryer and afterburner are fired on LPO, a c1esun burning fuel containing a minimal amount of sulfur compounds. The analyser did not consider impacts of fugitive emissions from bulk materials handling, ancillary equipment such as diesel generator,,, or other emissions sources in the ar, a. However, even without those emitting activities, this analysis demonstrates that concurrent operations may cause ambient concentrations to exceed short -term PMio and S02 NAAQS and maximum allowable increases. I modeled the ambient air quality impacts using the Industrial Source Complex Short-Tenn (ISCST3) version 02035. Version 02035 was released earlier this year and is the most recent version of the ISCSTI model. Meteorological Data ISCST3 requires hourly meteorological data to estimate plume dispersion. According to EPA's Guideline on Air Quality Models (40 CFR 60 part 51 aPPendix W), the data should consist of at least one,year of site specific data or. 5 year of area -wide data. 1 used five years of area -wide data collected2 at the nearest location — National Weather Service (NWS) Station 25501 at the. United States Coast Guard Station. The upper air data was also collectedat the same weather station, which is several kilometers to the northeast of the modeled sources. Because the meteorological data used is not site specific, the recorded weather conditicms, especially wind direction, could differ from actual conditions at the BEI and SPI facilities. The differences would mainly be due to variations in the surrounding terrain at the two different locations. While they could affect the locations where modeled maximum impacts occur, they would not significantly affect the maximum concentrations modeled. Given the size of the operations, I do not endorse collection of a year of on -site data as part of any future compliance demonstration. Area -wide meteorological data from the existing NWS station would be appropriate for any future analysis of BEI's and SPI's operations. Building Downwash Downwash refera to conditions where the plume pattern is influenced by nearby structures. The modeling of downwash impacts requires the inclusion of dimensions from nearby buildings. Actual building dimensions and locations were not available for this analysis. To approximate building .downwash caused by equipment and control facilities, I included a structure approximately B x 24 x 10 feet high near each operation. EPA has established specific algorithms for determining which buildings must be included and for determining the profile dimensions that would be "seen" by a given stack. EPA has incorporated Mese'algorithrns in a separate computer program called the "Building Profile Input Program" (BPIP). I used BPIP to determine the needed building profiles for use with ISCST3. The met data was xe.:oided between 1990 and 1995. C:17EMAMcMling.doeJ FROM : Carver Geologic Kodiak Alaska FAX NO. : 907 487 4002 Jan. 28 2003 03:01PM P3 ul. to• u� 14. rn.s Gt», raun Air' and t1'at:ef' I113111.t rvy 141003 BELSPI Concurrent Operat.ons • 3 - December 1I., 2002 Modeling Review Ambient Mr Boundary For purposes of air quality modeling, "ambient air" means outside air to which the public has access. I used the roadways borderng the two facilities as the ambient air boundary for this cursory analysia. I did not assess impacts from each operation on the adjacent work site. It is also likely that public access cannot be legally precluded nearer to the sources than the assumed ambient boundary. Therefore, actual ambient air boundaries for the facilities may be closer to the modeled sources than the roadways. Facility and Receptor Locations For this cursory analysis, I assumed flat terrain. All heights are measured from zero meters elevation. The source locations at the work site are approximate, as both facilities are transportable. Source locations were determined from descriptions provided by the Department's compliance assurance staff who conducted on -site source test quality.assurance during the first week of November 2002. Modeled Emission Rates. I modeled PMto emission rates determined from recent source test data for emissions of total particulate matter. I assumed all particulate matter collected in the source test has an aerodynamic diameter less than 10 microns. However, the source test results do not include the condensable,portion of the PM10 emissions. I calculated the sulfur dioxide ($O2) emission rate assuming a fuel sulfur content of 05 percentage wt. and the fuel consumption rate. 1 calculated the fuel consumption rate from rated fuel burning capacity3 (MM Btu/hr) and the lower heating value of fuel oil (19,000 Btu/lb). The assumed PMto emission rates could be higher than actual because a portion of the particulate matter actually emitted would have an aerodynamic diameter greater than 10 microns, and would not be considered a regulated air conta_ninant. Because the sources' actual fuel consumption rate may be lower than the rated capacity, the resulting SO2 mass emission rate could be lower than calculated. Results and Discussion The maximum impacts on local ambient air quality are presented in "Table 1 •- Combined Impacts." The maximum impacts of BEI's operations alone are presented in "Table 2 - BEI Impacts." The maximum impacts of SPI's operations alone are presented in "Table 3 - SPI Impacts." As shown below in Table -1, the maximum impacts exceed the 3 -hr and 2A -hr S02 NAAQS. The facilities' combined impacts also exceed the 24 -hr NAAQS for ambient concentrations of PM1u. The maximum SO2 impacts occurred at receptors closest to REI's facility. Maximum PMto impacts occurred at receptors closest to SPI's facility. SO2 modeling was performed for BSI's sources only. SPI burns LPG, which contains negligible amounts of sulfur. The Cedar Rapids aggregate dryer uses s trauch model S104360P burner rated at 70.4 MM Iry /hr (April 25, 1495 letter to the Department frorn R ^txrt }Isles of BM. in fl]e No. Brechsn Enterprises Inc. 1998). the AF9CONiadsen asphalt plant is rated et 45 3 AM Btu/hr. (Permit application, construction permit f1 a No. X -113.) Ci1TEMRVf odeFog.doe] FROM : Carver Geologic Kodiak Alaska FAX NO. : 907 487 4002 'Jan. 2B 2003 03:02PM P4 141084 U1i 28JUd 14148 YtA Yb8 /085 ,11Y and Pater 1411111Ly BEIISPI Concurrent Operations - Modeling Review .4. December 11, 2002 Shown as follows in Table -2, the impacts of BET s asphalt plant and aggregate dryer exceed NAAQS for 3 -hr and 24 -hr concentrations of S02. BEI's operations may also cause ambient PM10 concentrations to exceed the PSD increments. The aggregate dryer, a component of an older asphalt plant, is operating under a separate general permit than the asphalt plant currently used at the site. The aggregate dryer was installed before the baseline date for PM10 and SO2. Its emissions do not count towards increment consumption. However, thenew asphalt plant was installed after the P■10 and S02 baseline dates, and has a higher particulate ;natter emission rate than the aggregate dryer. Therefore. the Department finds that there is a reasonable likelihood that BEl's operations may cause ambient concentrations to exceed the NAAQS and increments for 3 -hr and 24-hr SO2 concentrations and increment for 24 -hr PMtp concentrations. As shown below in Table -3, the impacts of SP1'e soil remediation unit cxxcd NAAQS and increments for 24 -hr concentrations of PMIO. SPI's soil remediation unit was installed after the PMI0 baseline date. .As such, emissions from SPI's facility are increment consuming. Table 3 — SPI acts It is important to note that since ambient concentrations vary with distance from each source, the maximum values shown represent the highest value that may occur somewhere in the local airshed. They do not represent the highest concentration that could occur ar all locations in the arca. 4503 maximum impacts based on emissions from BE]'s equipment only. PM,s muxim:un impacts based on emissions from BEI and SPI. CG{TIIMP 4odolcig.dxl FROM : Carver Geologic Kodiak Alaska FAX NO. : 907 487 4002 VI/ GJ /I/J AV. g- ISA LU4 IJVU :111 dt!U it l.WI NUdli Jan. 2B 2003 03:03PM P5 Cl/1.1.1 BEI/SPI Concurrent operations - 5 - Modeling Review CONCLUSION Based on the modeling analysis, the .Department has concluded the following: December t 1.2002 1. There is a reasonable likelihood that the combined operations of Brechan Enterprises Inc.'s and Soil Processing Inc.'s facilities may cause or significantly contribute to ambient impacts exceeding the NAAQS and increments for 3 -hr and 24 -hr ambient concentrations of SO2'and 24-hr concentration of PM1o. 2, There is a reasonable likelihood that impacts from Brechan Enterprises Inc.'s operations of the asphalt plant concurrently with the drum dryer may cause or significantly contribute to exceeding the NAAQS and increments for 3 -hr and 24 -ht ambient concentrations of 502. BEI's operationR may also cause or significantly contribute to ambient PMto concentrations exceeding the 24 -hr increment. 3. There is a reasonable likelihood that ttic impacts from Soli Processing Inc.'s facility may cause or. significantly contribute to ambient impacts exceeding the NAAQS awl increments for 24-hr concentrations of PMl0. RECOM1vreibA.TIONS. 1. Relocate each permitted facility to a location whete a suitable ambient air boundary can be established. The requirements for such boundary are • Closest edge of boundary is at least 100 meterss from tho source. • The permittee has the legal right to preclude public access within::hat bound 2. If not relocating, obtain a site specific permit with operational and/or emission limitations that ensure protection of ambient air quality. In support of the permit application, provide ambient air quality modeling in accordance with 18 AAC 50.310Cn)(2). The modeling should incorporate the following assumptions. • Use actual dimensions and locations of structures at the work sites. Such structures would include portable buildings, the baghouse, rotary drum dryer; truck loading hopper, and any other structures with height 10 feet or greater, but would not include aggregate piles or trucks. • Use actual stack heights and locations'of all sources. • Use actual ambient air boundary. The recommended distance from the source to the ambient boundary is as described above in recommendation 1. • Model PMe• emission rates based on the most recent source test results. • Model 502 emission rates based on the maximum fuel burning capacity and permitted fuel sulfur limit. • Include emissions from ;tncillsry equipment, for example diesel generator sets. • Include emissions from neighboring facilities. • Calculate sources' emission rates based on continuous operation or enforceable operational limits. $ Metro from Rtll Walter :o John lcutrrbach. Subject: Screen 3 modeling analytic. Date: September 16; 1997, File 77.02.01. C:ITHMmmeeetteg•atel FROM : Carver Geologic Kodiak Alaska FAX NO. : 907 487 4002 lA.4l rdS cer rsue alt' and nuLer 4u&.Llc3, Jan. 28 2003 03:03PM P6 I-JUU6 BEI/SP1 Concurrent Operazions - 6 - December 11, 2002 Modeling Review cc; Bev Williams, ADEC /AWQ /APP, Anchorage, AK Randy Lucas, ADEC /AWQ /APP, Fairbanks, AK Bill Smyth, ADEC/SPS /CAI, Fairbanks, AK CATEMPtMnieimg *Lc; Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation Dispersion Modeling Summary For Asphalt Plants and Rock Crushers Prepared by Bill Walker This summary is to support the renewal of general air quality operating permits for asphalt plants and rock crushers. The department specifically requests comment on the assumptions used to characterize these facilities, and on how we should use the information produced by the modeling analysis. Background On May 1, 1998 the department issued permits for transportable or stationary asphalt plants. Because asphalt plants were allowed to move from one location to another while operating under one permit, AS 46.14215 requires a demonstration that operations do not cause violations of ambient air quality standards or applicable increments. In support of that permit, the department did air quality dispersion modeling using SCREEN3'. During the life of that permit, the department has received a substantial number of complaints about emissions from some of the asphalt plants using the general permit. The complaints involve the potential for adverse impacts on human health and welfare.2 The complaints were about dust and odors, and specifically questioned whether the department has evaluated the effects of neighbors being on elevated terrain, and the operation of more than one industrial facility at the same location. The modeling for the 1998 permits did not look at either elevated terrain or multiple industrial operations at one location. At that time, we also did not have a way to estimate emissions from any sources other than the stack emissions from aggregate dryers, drum mixers, or diesel engines used to provide electrical power. Therefore, several important sources of particulate matter were not part of the analysis. Asphalt Plants Model and Methods Used For this modeling analysis I used ISCST3'. This allowed sources to be distributed over a three dimensional space. [SCREEN3 does not.] The modeling is intended to represent asphalt plants operating anywhere in the state. To make the modeling as representative as possible, I used emission rates and stack parameters from 28 asphalt plant source test reports. I estimated stack heights from photographs or visible emission inspection [Method 9] reports. Source test reports show operation at rates both above and below the SCREEN3 AND ISCST3 are EPA computer models for predicting concentrations of pollutants in the air to which the public has access. They use data on weather and on the emission sources to make the calculations. 2 it is important to note that most plants operating under the general permits did so without public complaints to the department. January 6, 2003 DRAFT 1 standard of 0.04 gr /dscf. Emission rates for all stacks modeled were based on operation at that standard. The background PM -10 concentration I applied was 41 ug/n>3, from Nikiski air monitoring data. - The meteorological data set was a screening data set similar to the one used in SCREEN3. It was developed for ISCST3 by Pat Hanrahan of the State of Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. The model predicted one hour ambient concentrations. To get 24 hour concentrations, I multiplied the results by 0.4, following EPA guidelines. Fugitive particulate matter emissions were modeled as volume sources as this best approximates how they are released. Receptors were placed from 50 meters from the center of the operation, to 2000 meters. Each receptor was modeled assuming flat terrain, and terrain heights of 10, 15, 20, 25, and 40 meters. I used the worst case of the flagpole heights, 0, 2, or 4.5 meters for each receptor. Two meters and 4.5 meters were intended to represent the height of a first story window, and either a roof air intake or a second story window. I combined all modeled sources in two scenarios — controlled and uncontrolled for fugitive emissions. [Asphalt plant stack emissions were modeled at the NSPS emission limit of 0.04 gr /dscf for both scenarios.] Fugitive Particulate Matter Sources A recent EPA publication3 provided estimates of fugitive emissions for: Dust from vehicle traffic, including dump trucks and loaders; Receiving new aggregate; RAP crushing; Screening; Loadout; and For drum mix plants, silo filling. The estimated emissions from vehicle traffic, RAP crushing, and screening depend on whether there are emission controls, such as water sprays, and for vehicle traffic, whether the ground is wet or dry and dusty and the soil silt content. Emissions from these sources also depend on the production rates and other source specific factors. I used the emission factors and assumptions in the following table. 3 Hot Mix Asphalt Plant Emission Assessment Report. EPA- 454/R -00 -019, December, 2000. January 6, 2003 DRAFT 2 Fugitive Particulate Matter Emission Factors and Assumptions - Emission Source PM-10 Emission Factor Source of Emission Factor Assumptions All Sources 12 hours of operation per day 150 tons of HMA per hour Loaders E = 2.6 (s/12)" x (W/3)" x 1/(M/0.2)" where s is, ground silt content W is vehicle weight M is soil moisture E is pounds of PM-10 /vehicle mile traveled AP-42. Table 13.2.2 Caterpillar 928g Loader 12 1/4 tons 3 yard bucket capacity 20 feet from aggregate pile to inlet hoppei Soil Moisture - uncontrolled operation 0•7%4 - controlled operation 20% 10% road silt4 Trucks Same as loaders Same as Loaders 10 1/2 tons empty 12 ton capacity 200 meters from gravel source to dryer 50 meters to property boundary Soil Moisture - for uncontrolled operation - 0.7%4 - - no emissions when wet 10% road silt4 Screening Controlled - 0.00084 Uncontrolled — 0.015 lb/ton AP-42 11.19.2 RAP Crushing Controlled — 0.00059 Uncontrolled — 0.0024 AP-42 11.19.2 Factor for tertiary crushing4 Results The model predicted ambient air quality standards violations for each terrain height. For each model run I found the distance from the center of the operation to the nearest receptor with predicted compliance with the ambient standards. The distances to compliance were much greater for the model runs which fugitive emission sources as uncontrolled. Distances were 1500 and 1600 meters — about one mile. For controlled sources, the model predicts ambient standards violations only at smaller distances from the operation. The distance to compliance for controlled sources increases with terrain height up to 25 meters, and then levels off. (See Figure 1.) The distances to compliance were measured from the center of the operation to the nearest receptor in compliance with the ambient standard. These distances could be 4 Hot Mix Asphalt Plant Emission Assessment Report. EPA-454/R-00-019, December, 2000, page 15 January 6, 2003 DRAFT 3 refined by calculating the location between the two receptors where compliance was and was not predicted. The sources of emissions as modeled were symmetrical. This would not be the case for actual operations. A more practical measure might be the distance from the edge of the operation. The sources modeled were 50 meters from the center to the edge. 45 40 35 20 E m25 w C 20 O 15 10 5 0 Figure 1 "Controlled" Asphalt Plant Emission Sources 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Distance to Compliance iron Center of Operation (m) January 6, 2003 DRAFT 4 350 400 :, 4n �a ` '31 1 '✓x. _'?3 #aiY Y € ?{ xta✓'$a i d` t +J ? ayY_.e3w�is7cC},y�. b: PS= iT.i.?k".4 `"Y w�'` ^r t '�aaN 1. 12;7y �-',:kfN' ) `3f SkF. n - t ^i=. '�{ f . reL {] Fa v'.Y- e'PY - t' {�r�`wG.. W {�nLY 't`�... 1' �' ;�,,�}5,�y, S 'i is —5' 2 - 3^"' tlf✓ acv. rF '$'ss 2*,:�`'Fx, ^,n 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Distance to Compliance iron Center of Operation (m) January 6, 2003 DRAFT 4 350 400 Crushers Sources modeled For modeling crusher emissions, I had less information than asphalt plants. I assumed 150 tons per hour of material crushed for 12 hours per day, using primary, secondary, and tertiary crushers. 150 tons per hour is the size threshold for portable rock crushing plants to be subject to EPA's New Source Performance Standard, and therefore subject to state permitting. I assumed that half of the material passing through primary and secondary crushers was sent to the next crusher, the other half to a finished material pile. I also assumed the use of two 500 hp diesel generators and that all material was moved once by a front end loader.5 For emission factors, I used EPA emission factors from AP -42 for diesel engines, and for controlled and uncontrolled crushers, screens, and conveyors. Controlled emissions for the loader assumed a high soil moisture content. Results For uncontrolled emissions, the model predicted the distance to compliance with the 24 hour PM -10 ambient standard was 800 meters from the center of the operation. This assumes flat terrain. For controlled emissions the model predicted the following distances to compliance. Flagpole receptors higher than ground level had smaller predicted distances. Terrain Ht at receptor Distance to compliance (m) (m) 0 225 10 225 25 275 40 275 5 Photographs of a 2002 rock crushing operation showed two diesel engines, one associated with a VSI crusher. Pioneer recommends 400 — 600 hp for their large VSI crushers. January 6, 2003 DRAFT 5 46 40 35 30 26 20 15 10 5 0 45 40 36 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 0 Multiple Industrial Facilities at One Location Air quality effects on neighbors can be increased by the operation of more than one asphalt plant at one location, or by the operation of an asphalt plant and a related activity such as a rock crusher to make aggregate. I estimated the impact of having two asphalt plants operating at the same location by measuring the predicted distance to compliance if the emission rates were doubled. 2 Asphalt plants at one location Compliance predicted for > 80% of sources 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Distance to compllance from Center of Operation (m) 2 Asphalt plants at one location Compliance predicted for > 90% of sources 700 1 - ?:4---1,. -4„ 4- • . k0 '.- ' -"..-,,. C'.." ' ;f7) :. * ;' ',7-1 •;< .:.V''" :..,, , ' ?0,i,,,,,,,,:: i:v.,.. , . y...„,-, _ .--, ,,,,,,•,,,, ... .. ''...-.,.„ •ti.'.4.4icgir,*_ :1K1-4.4 4k/...,,,,,,,,. 4 - ''' , ''''' BA'S kq.s,..:70" '''' .?,, 4., Ti.i..*"" 40-...Vah ”. ' A ,.•.-'8'.v.1.1. .:2- ' ' ' - '''':41,, aa,-4 . . ''..A.' ,e ; , 'Al:- ,. • , re,,,, , l'' igif-• it''''' it. A"..i,k- .4 — , -„, z , • 4' . . _ ,,,,„ ,.. ,,r. ti,A . , .;‘,, g - : : z.,(0—k,., ... ..= ,,, , . 4 . -- , 17- V ."' 'A . S 0,-- . '*'.. . „i.icliff,174:- ",!-,1,7344.74.1.,,k4V.iffit ' -1,-T.'0), .4,I3r6 ,k,..-,-.:414( -§-117.,*4..=bert..-tiqat. MI ' •-,.. _ r. ., ' ...,V , - ...% If 0 s. .-..,.. TS , 4e •4..,..-- i 6K. • •-• . • ' ."••• 4 3-='-'-' ', -WIT, ., '1, .■ ' 0' ta , q: • ." . ... : '*.., , , .1 41 % ..-• ,• vo .>, - V • - 4' • - .. .. . . , 4., , r -.#. r . .:7• - ...oi--, . . , x , A.- .,..., - ,:i?„:.. 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Distance to compllance from Center of Operation (m) 2 Asphalt plants at one location Compliance predicted for > 90% of sources 700 1 - ?:4---1,. -4„ 4- • . k0 '.- ' -"..-,,. C'.." ' ;f7) :. * ;' ',7-1 •;< .-Iif , ' ,:„ 4i. 4:,,,,i „,,,,, -4, - , ,, , .,.. ... --,,,,- .., - , • ?0,i,,,,,,,,:: i:v.,.. , . y...„,-, _ .--, ,,,,,,•,,,, ... .. ''...-.,.„ •ti.'.4.4icgir,*_ :1K1-4.4 4k/...,,,,,,,,. 4 - ''' , ''''' BA'S kq.s,..:70" '''' .?,, 4., Ti.i..*"" 40-...Vah ”. ' A ,.•.-'8'.v.1.1. .:2- ' ' ' - '''':41,, aa,-4 . . ''..A.' • 4 '04.0.,., F. a -r,i5dz liAttk ,e ; , 'Al:- ,. • , re,,,, , l'' igif-• it''''' it. A"..i,k- -.1:. ' -' ' — , -„, z , • 4' . . _ ,,,,„ g - 2'-.P„r4le.0:4:414.--: i'lf -"AligVar it,..t4$g. tgW . , . 4 . -- „ .--vrei:?.,,WiAtgimk, e, ..,0,— 7,1'14','''' . xft, . .,, w. Vai...,:ir•714e1.-5,,,,..: i',4k;-'44 4i-i•I;.;•77..V,%'14,*,,. '1#%/%444W,At ''' 51.R.J7,4Wri ''''''' ' 'ff4,:7;1, .'-'414W,!,---4. '.11',,At‘;;;."4.•,,?3-• It f';',0,47,k. '- 4.,... ,,,,(4- , • , „i.icliff,174:- ",!-,1,7344.74.1.,,k4V.iffit ' -1,-T.'0), .4,I3r6 ,k,..-,-.:414( -§-117.,*4..=bert..-tiqat. MI 100 200 300 400 500 500 Distance to compliance from Center of Operation (m) January 6, 2003 DRAFT 6 700 I also estimated the impact from having an asphalt plant adjacent to a crushing operation. The separation distances between the two modeled plants was 25 meters. Since the sources were asymmetrical, the distances to compliance are reported here as from the edge of the operation rather than the center. Crusher and Asphalt plant Terrain Ht at receptor Distance to compliance (m) (m) 0 350 10 400 25 475 40 675 Uncertainties Each of the assumptions described contributes uncertainty to the results of this analysis. Since there is no one set of assumptions that will fit all operations, the intent was to describe a reasonable worst case. Since the general permits can be used anywhere in the state, there is no one set of meteorological data that would be appropriate for all operations. This is why I chose a "screening" data set that presents a wide variety of conditions to fmd the reasonable worst case one hour concentration. The predictions would be appropriate to the extent that these screening conditions fit any actual location for an extended number of hours, the wind direction is toward nearby structures such as businesses or residences, and operation occurs during these conditions for about 12 hours per day. These uncertainties must be considered when applying the modeling results to any applicability criteria or permit conditions for the general permits. Odor The odor from asphalt plants is a common source of concern to nearby residents, especially those with special health problems. However, odor cannot be modeled, so it could not be included in this analysis. January 6, 2003 DRAFT 7 LOT 1 U59 2139 G LEGENI renmu us C) CIMICRVATICO wwu USE )IAK ISLAND BOROUGH ZONING MAP S FIATS. RUSSIAN CREEK SUBDMSIONS At PORTIONS OF USS 2539 moov+ ao+� ICCSIDEMIL • w " 11/13/02 11:24 FAX 907451±-1 ADEC AWQ FMCS ;A r IL , 17u i 1// 7`, rr ,r" n u 'III 1'1 1.1 I ' ./ 1--1) ) I A ‘`. V ti I I 1_,= Li 12., L! DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION DIVISION OF AIR AND WATER QUALITY Jennie D. Sharpe, CEO Soil Processing, Inc. 207 E. Northern Lights Blvd., Suite 103A Anchorage, Alaska 99503 November 13. 2002 0001/001 TONY KNOWLES, GOVERNOR 610 TJniversity Avenue Fairbanks, AK 99709-3643 Director's Office:(907) 269-7686 Fairbanks Office; (907) 451-2360 Pax: (907) 451-2187 lirto://www.state_ak.us/clecl Re: Soil Processing, Inc.'s soil remediation unit — recent emission source test. Ms. Sharpe: The Department of Envirornnental Conservation accepts the results of the most recent emission source test conducted on Soil Processing Inc.'s soil remediation unit. The facility passed the emission test and is authorized to operate under terms of Permit AP000204 (0P4 — Soil Remediation Unit General Permit). Facility: Soil Processing Inc. Permit #: AP000204 (General Permit #4) Test Date: 11/9/02 — 11/10/02 Test Location: Kodiak Witnessed By: Matt Wilkinson/ADEC Results: 0.027 gr/dscf Standard: < 0.05 g/dscf If you have any questions concerning this letter, please feel free to contact Matt Wilkinson in Fairbanks at (907) 451-5172 or Beverley Williams in Anchorage at (907) 269-7574. Sincerely, 4? / Robert P. Cannone Air Permits Compliance Supervisor cc: Kodiak Borough GAAWQ\Awq-Permits\ALRFACS \Soil Processing Inc\Compliance\Source Test Ltr.doc Clean Air, Clean Water COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .l �r i l I I t ,' '\ Iri g �r r.L_ I i / i `I i,1t II 181 \.\ l i Ijy DEPT_ OF ENVIRCINNE'PTAL CONSERVATION DIVISION OF AIR AND WATER QUALITY Jennie D. Sharpe, CEO Soil Processing, Inc. 207 E. Northern Lights Blvd., Suite 103A Anchorage, Alaska 99503 November 13, 2002 _ TONY KNOWLES, GOVERNOR 610 University Avenue Fairbanks, AK 99709 -3643 Director's Office:(907) 269 -7686 Fairbanks Office: (907) 451 -2360 Fax: (907) 451 -2187 http://www.state.ak.usideci Re: Soil Processing, Inc.'s soil remediation unit — recent emission source test. Ms. Sharp The Departr =lent of Environmental Conservation accepts the results of the most recent emission source test conducted on Soil Processing Inc.'s soil remediation unit. The facility passed the emission test and is authorized to operate under terms of Permit AP000204 (GP4 — Soil Remediation Unit General Permit). Facility: Soil Processing Inc. Permit #: AP000204 (General Permit #4) Test Date: 11/9/02 —11 /10/02 Test Location: Kodiak Witnessed By: Matt Wilkinson/ADEC Results: 0.027 gr /dscf Standard: <= 0.05 gr /dscf If you have any questions concerning this letter, please feel free to contact Matt Wilkinson in • Fairbanks at (907) 451 -5172 or Beverley Williams in Anchorage at (907) 269 -7574. Sincerely, Robert P. Cannone Air Permits Compliance Supervisor. cc: Kodiak Borough G:1AWQ'Awq- Permits\AIRFACS \Soil Processing Inc\Compliance\Source Test Ltr.doc zoo II v Clean Air, Clean Water sxsd bAtY a3av LsrusrL06 %id ZZ :TT ZO /CT /TT 11/13/02 11:22 FAX 9074512187 ADEC AWQ FBBS A i r Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Air and Water Quality 610 University Avenue Fairbanks, AK 99709 -3643 Fax (907) 451 -2187 FAX COVER SUEET Date: i t ✓ 17402_ To: Ga1S5 Fax Nu wber (cto -) r$6— q37 Company: jc,„0 3 ck ! o r� u qin From: M, A Jr -r 1n1 11 k sue., Phone Number: ( 0'71 15/-5112. Number of pages: '7 including this cover sheet Comments: To rw►•-q4,-.. i- coy con (tr.,: re-v i Q.w e.J r 5177 `S S o Lm-ce, 4ee+ P "anr� t d 'r S-vk,r(L. # J+ ferztel, .�� 9..►0 z op, '� 4,O O� erve. `t`C 5a � k � Safr� �,1 y et i d Vh�tW t2 .0\4 , 0 "L SCwsp put - 1t vy, 1 //i pV�. s,o w-ce1� i�1�(,a -fie fykt t- s -fie s4-66-e. S4- i csr-t s p4 1( l R4a , a ". 0rt C r 7 . 2 6A-U 1.. 41Na. P k Cwt/ Prk i 44€r s-Ptirce. W as C o A c,44 t. c-t- cnr -dl +v %•- /U. c, , ..14„ d1 ; /*a A S0 VUrGI. 7e-1g 19 "k 0 to , z e-.1*s s s o-14-V" mow., .54e » it+1 4-3 A° 2. Bie'S {n 14e4 CC/N4the Vgfirt s- -es p c j fie.. sok,,- i e��- s se�,� 44.4 •merle 'yw _6,tis ft, 60E -c• qvt4/(- t1/124;e44.151,1 FOM :SOILPRO FAX NO :9072749295 SOIL PROCESSING INC. 207 E. NORTHERN LIGHTS BLVD., SUITE 103A ANCHORAGE, AK 99503 FAX TRANSMITTAL LETTER DA1E:t 0L TitviE• €.3-%00P41 Nov. 12 2002 04:10PM P1 1 FROM: Telephone (907) 274-3000 Fax (907) 274-9295 CONFIRM RECEIPT: y YES NO TRANSMITTING PAGES INCLUNDING COVER LETTER, REMARKS Q_Cr (...1 S o - hoc-5 L s t c..LAJOc_-C) FiTM : SO I LPRO = tLA$KA 5QURC E TEST i NG LLC Alaska Source Testing 3. SOURCE DESCRIPTION FAX NO. :9072749295 Nov. 12 2002 04:10PM P2 f'flyC r•IO. :9075694225 Nov. :2 2502 02:43'H P1 SPt, Inc, 2002 Soil Processing Ind.'s soil remediation unit (SRU) is used for treating petroleum contaminated oils. The SRU is rated at 12 tons per hour. The SRU is equipped with a PowerCloneml Modal PC5-22 wet scrubber system and a SOILttFKT i Model 300 afterburner to control emissions. 4. SAMPLE LOCATION AND TRAVERSE METHODOLOGY ire SRU has a 16 -Inch stack that transitions to 24 inches. The sample ports are located at a point where the stack diameter is16.5- inches. The ports are oriented 90 degrees apart. The ports are located approximately 80 inches downstream and 22 inches upstream of the nearest disturbance. Figure 4.1 shows the cross - sectional area of stack at the sample location. The measurements or the traverse points are provided on the figure. 5. OPERATIONS AND TESTING CONDITIONS Fri ase refer to Appendix E for copies of the unit log sheets during the tests. 'Run 1 ! 2 3 i • Soil Feed Rate (TPH) f 12.18 12.49 i_ 11.95 • Particulate Control H2O Flow Rate (gallmin) I 2.5 2.5 2,5 r Pressure Drop_across scrubber (in. H2 r 0.4 ? 3-4 3-4 __ I Water. Flow Rate (gal/min) 1 _ 69 69 69 Make -up H10 Flow Rateerrecyolgd H2O (gal /min) 1 8 I 8 6 Percent-of fines less than 200 were 6 %. Pond is 35 x 45 x 7 feet with a 10 -mill liner. A. TEST PROCEDURES AND APPARATUS r he individual test procedures used during this testing program were conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Methods as prescribed in 40 CFR 60, Appendix A. 'The specific methods are listed below. Method 1 Itthod 2 Method 3A Method 4 Method 5 Method 9 Sample and velocity traverses for stationary sources Determination of stack gas velocity and volumetric flow rate (Type 8 Pitot tube) Determination of oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations In emissions from stationary sources (Instrumental Analyzer Procedure) Determination of moisture content in stack gases Determination of particulate emissions from stationary sources Visual determination of the opacity of emissions from stationary sources 2 Ccb- 4272-7 Lb h--Zth S/Z itXg 9s1/2 -t w an vs? srst00 v..44 V. ��� 7- 0jfidpV/ S Name0���=""��~ Ecret, Billy &Annette Lorentz, John &OaUas Fuller, Sean &Julie Jackson, Dave & Linda Schaeffer, Spencer & Robin Zwefdhof*r, Denis & Zocelyn Organ, Glenn Milligan, Mike Hocum, Tim O'Brain, Tresor Welch, Jeff & Dylan Mete, Greg & Winn Trosug, Tom & Pat Harris, Ted SWnmin, Dave &Sally Starkovichs Nelson, Mark & Patty Witteveen, Mark & Bree CVnnyd, David Lynch, Chris Heinrichs Gibbs, Ron Yashin, K. Neuman, Dave D'a|ia, Joe Springer, Tom & Terri Roberts, Bill &Shei|a En|e,Grog Barber, Patrick Stewart, Jeff Ingram, Bill &Chyde Pickett, Misti & Conard Oliver, Bill Turner, Darlene Hickey, Mary Ann Williams, Virginia Gmddn, Bea &D�� Wills, Nacy & Tim Rice, Marie & Dale Janz, Casey Crye, Carrie Wood, Kerry Levenson, Joan Myers, Maaike R. HeninQ, Fred fkKaren Goodall, Deb & Hogan, Doug Core|m, Jim Gondek, Edward & Cobis, Rose Ledoux, Gabrielle Buben, Vern & Mary Address 1185O Bells Flats Rd. 22528 Womans Bay Dr. 10742 Chiniak Dr. 1124GKmsinDr. 841 Sargent Creek Rd. 958 Sargent Creek Rd. 12906 Noch Dr. 12056 Gara Dr. 11800 Bells Flats Rd. 10826 Bells Flats Rd. 11114 S. Russian Creek Rd. 115O8 Bells Flats. Rd. 11132 Lake {JdbinC. 1O88GKa|oinDr. 11538VVo/nonm Bay Dr. 10589 Chiniak Dr. 1120 Sargent Creek Rd. 11542Ke|sinDr. 1O1 Otter Ave 11175 Lake Orbin 377 Neva Way 539 Visna Way 883 Preston Lane 883 Preston Lane 1211O Bells Flats Rd. 1116GVVonmmno Bay Dr. 11167 L. Orbin Dr. 10788 Chiniak Dr. 10745 Chiniak Dr. PO Box 86MKodiak Box 33O4/1OS11Ko|ninDr. Box 3216 / 98 Sargent Creek Rd. 3185Penisu|a P.(]. Box U6BKodiak P.O. Box 19O7Kodiak P.O. Box 766 Kodiak P.[t Box 2834Kodiak P.O. Box 1814Kodiak P.O. Box 1O74G Bells Flats Road 10674 Chiniak Dr. P.{}. Box 8241 12309 Cara Dr. P.O. Box 1284Kodiak 11020 Ugak Drive 11166 Lake Otis Dr. 11106 S. Russian Creek RD P.C). Box O681 13006 Noch Dr. 31Q Mill Bay P.O. Box 4485 Kodiak Email°N mrmak@keaconnect.net tnthocum@keaconnnect.net .com ; .com ttros@bigfoot.com H net.attnet davetish@att.net chrisl@ptialaska.net rheinric@ptialaska.net rgibba@vvoddnoLottnat idiqsuper@pcimet bookmatch@keaconnect.net tophngmr@goi.nmd orobedo@0oi.net mgorm@kmmconneot.nmt patsum@chugach.net wind-n-aem@e|aska.ommn Ilupickett@gdnet oliver@gci.met ricedale@ptialaska.net cjanz@keaconnect.net jwood@ideafamilies.org ]leven@ptialaska.nat Eller, Ron & Judy Andrews, John & Kay Pruitt, Russell Lane, Keith & Cheryl Studebaker, Stacy Houck, Patty Wall, Kristie Allan, Peter Rose, Eddie Boehland, Cheryl Brown, Kevin & Misty Booch, Lisa Thrasher, Jeff Williams, Bill Schaeffer, Robin Weekly, Michelle Hamlin, Ed & Eunice Doyle, Jack & Shari Carver, Gary & Molly Dutrich, Tess 11572 South Russian Creek Rd. 10778 Birch Cir. P.O. 622 Kodiak 759 Preston Lane P.O. Box 970 Kodiak P.O. Box 3032 / 12719 Noch Dr. 12593 Noch Dr. 12350 Noch Dr. 10773 Chiniak Dr. 538 B Sargent Creek P.O. Box 2619 P.O. Box 2726 P.O. Box 766 Kodiak P.O. Box 2133 115472 Woman's Bay Dr. 11446 Bells Flats Rd 10843 Chiniak Dr. 12021 Middle Bay Dr. P.O. Box 3342 Ron.eller @att.net knclane @ptialaska.net tidepool @ptialaska.net houckstr @ptialaska.net Walls @ptialaska.net erose @gci.net seabee @ptialaska.net sleddog @gci.net booch @ptialaska.net bfast @ptialaska.net rdschaeffer @yahoo.com mitchw@keaconnect.net ehamlin @gci.net redgate@ptialaska.net asoak @ptialaska.net I1C4\117. Anne ik Los-e,sr- 044. ve- t 1r' kt -'\ (4' er j 1141s(3"3 0Ge ie ho ,c rj17 V,' 11 1 0°A ��f CGS r CD' aci e v1 P5 q\clk. catsxak e1)s 045 SZ4S Worr,e ' �s arr` 107'12 C k u t,tV der. f (7 d Ket,CS $Lt $te a.• c- Aiegdiil f (Wed/Pc/ /2 kg. MCA Pr l ZO6 Gcarq �r 102 B .,lk F(c 4 tom. i \ W-1 s . R ►--ti ad Ire 1)4 e 1 r b? gehl -z5 2)Z *T7 i oV - ///3 rn O . 4 Mi.) /00'6 f4 #),5 , 104, t FYI 1A6Atim,5TaLAV ,�� 0s-6i C_1 -I13 I- 1* //20 \50/titer*QA4RA, E \MZ kl}ISiN pfL 11).14•11C7 C©t-A 4.rJ (1s Ly,n c,\N loN1.4& (i L,11 s AUE Eue.A A b' 0.. /Ohl Pt 71--e;/-t-/ Rif ka,i 1CL P0 0 0 J 8S3 PRESfionl tA ..r -- --��.� O6.rf.e @sc.% , nt-k K11(.1 r,l(C 1404,44( .�a� 4ss ',ala.sXsi I4lrvniKQ4ctccoo .ecr 4,774 ilc4ii,p /one. Cr,) ,h P--la,- ,5k4 n icheinrrCC? /a/a-Ca'.b bbs cwt r,)cn ldne ,. Q l4/1e i (o ff e l f Fi 0. ' ���� /tea(Grol.te '.n /// (acv Va.., S Di• 71-3( 4,1 G 7 Z , 023 t0115 ChtAl tIkv, D p a643 17 Ate. ■ r e_3 te �QQr@ keg. e oh'1ecf, 4 )' p 4-sLim c cat a6t • Nei - Ihdt -N -sett COok5) {9.1A.0u1 1-334. i / /cq 131'. za \k J o srtr e, epepe G.IU910_, -apt 6f ,e 5,t( ul AAA 4%--(dke r° (5o K l,0107 141-tede.., 1P2 cge9-r 7‘6 cr 4c, c231 oz.< r ,7/41 a/ezfe'. 6,6,4-astAtkia. di I Ve I 4.466,net I 06: 74 Cki ct, JJb Wicohhec4-, ".42, Woo \)-(Dok Qvck v-eAnson I 2.SLI 1:odiedc „S Le ven 0_,Lokec. vie+ 16\IR).(5 t 02-0 0ik s ivIttr€fv,A-tcl.akiliicp.cinvv wrprvity-o(9■(,*0.14 0.0 c " 11-c-ii Z --, v vi- LA..) re £/f eitoi afic; 0 Id 4 JQ eAdeti DOI,t3 fill& 111010 3, 4ISS(ctA Ce1C EA ---‘ l."...04%) • Ir,D-\/%gi \ Eel warz,..),.,j ii i. goA5Gt., ose Q_ofivis tc ' te. ( ( t7; - C‘A plc( 1 i e Le Do u -K 2 iy Mill /�y ,4isrffoqp„ p4:101145kA.A4F, VE g IV 4- fithq Am ..n/ Icl i 1 ox, 4 ite6 i".0),9k-i A k 'q 4- / -C A , ,_ _ • --` - ‘k " au.),,i,ci.€ 9 ..,4_,-‘,21 4,4J7/4-/e //572 s; d ffl.A...? -7'Z lar6/ 5" .-ecyti. r7/672 v2-At cr Rdy- ii\)dreAa.5 )0796 b;r‹..k C, ! . 2.:,‘7 . • i :,e9 '_ .4.4--d , _ _ __ tirse// it, cligr 62(DX ,6ZZ, 1<cz/e ' fr - 9e6.75 -- --*f--- i cilia*. LAoe. - ris-ot ?i2izi,,,, Logi xoz,AIL.,00/. criws. 1<dc-ctne-- ;114464- L.. i r 13cDx 170, kock.111,L A- 14 19 i1: Ptitrcgic - c e it/L.0V- ' ii):4 5 OL&c ' ---6)(-30- 1c).-.119. No 6'•3 r' kciA.c,46e-Cco.c.,-kA , , # lo?,5-q3 A (A, ,9/9 ttialise id; ed,s4,406 ' "Dterii.e, he, -( )eh lam 56exbaLeft(eziaskk.. • , ..1 P d.(41 ?96/ , • +4,,,,oser....roort Ikamalbsorraosecao...,...ternerrxideerseir Ls. 5-MS SAeCiGAir ae-eeK_ ledeiCii 03c 1-v (?4 ei)-6a_toR.4kez_ e V) 7. • 44grre,e7/47i4 'L 4 ro4)( 7‘e 3d4aelrer PO l3-eix 2/33 raschaae,r 04,2A`)D1' d7 e// Woekly Ps-44z ,ove,21 .)r, /Y/74 A ztJ 81+ atn.te, 1-6tinif.r) iq-ckp ells rids ed. eillm b'r7 t-ssak os4-k3 C44",4 IL Lk 6G-4-1-2__ 04\1 (4 CVVQ( 1 20/ Mcide Pk, utzxios difeK. 33 U.S. postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No insurance Cover Provided) Article Sent To: LJ ru ru m IT Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Require Total Postage & Fees Postmark Here 6-10A Name (Please Prl t Clearly (To Ida completed by mailer) Street, Apt. No., or PO Box City, State, ZIP+ 4 PS Form 3800, July 1999 See Reverse for Instructions Kodiak Island Borough Community Development Department 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Phone (907) 486-9363 Fax (907) 486-9396 www.kib.co.kodiak.ak.us Tuesday, November 05, 2002 NOTICE OF VIOLATION CERTIFIED MAIL/RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED RECEIPT No.: 7099 3220 0000 0475 8798 Ref: Bells Flats Subdivision Block 3 Tract A Applicable Zoning District: I - Industrial Zoning District Re: Suspension of Kodiak Island Borough Zoning Compliance Permit BZ-02-061, pending review of recent violation of air quality standards regulated by the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC). George Cline Jennie D. Sharpe Soil Processidg, nc. f 207 E. Northern Lights Blvd., Stilt, AnchoragetAK 99503 Dear Mr. C ine and Ms. Sh- f. We are in receipt of the Notice of Violation (NOV) issued by ADEC on October 29, 2002. In that correspondence, it is indicated that the soil remediation facility operated by Soil Processing Inc. (SPI) did violate certain air quality standards on or about September 6, 2002. In addition, further violations may have been occurring in the intervening time between September 6, 2002 and the date that SPI voluntarily halted processing operations as a result of the NOV issued by ADEC. -As we have discussed previously, the Kodiak Island Borough (KIB) relies on the air quality standards promulgated and enforced by ADEC in order to provide a reasonable assurance to the public that the performance standards of the I-Industrial zone, specifically KIBC 17.24.060.D and E, will be met. The Department has received a number of air quality complaints during this period of time, relating to both the soil processing use and the asphalt batch plant operated by Brechan Enterprises. Given the recent letters issued by ADEC in late September indicating that both uses were in compliance with ADEC requirements, the Department was still considering its response to those complaints. FILE COPY NACD\Soil Remediation\SP1 Revocation.docl 1/5/02 Page 1 of 3 In light of more recent events, however, the Department hereby SUSPENDS ZONING COMPLIANCE PERMIT BZ-02-061, pending an administrative hearing with the Department to go over the facts related to this air quality violation as it relates to the Borough's Industrial zone performance standards. In addition, the permit may not be reinstated until qualified testing indicates that the soil processing use may resume with a reasonable assurance that the air quality standards promulgated and enforced by ADEC will be met. Because the Industrial zoning performance standards are based on subjective assessment criteria, the Department has in the past always deferred to ADEC standards, which are quantitative and measurable. It has always been presumed that the measurable standards enforced by ADEC would be violated long before the more subjective performance standards set forth in the Borough code would be exceeded. When Borough staff has responded to complaints, there has been no reasonable way to reconcile field observations made with the testing and approvals previously granted by ADEC. We are concerned by the apparent conflicting information issued by ADEC and by the amount of time that has been permitted to pass from the time the violation occurred until the time that it was identified and acted upon. It is appreciated that Stfirs agreed to yoirun---ariit i'iltop soil:Rai -----e§sing;Teratilin S':,, until the facility can under/Maintenance and new testing. The BoroirgIC hhowever. feel s \ili t until. his .1 violation is resoled that the alm' grOmpliance pe7M,t will iencain inik,SPension\until4e ., operator receives written notice thai4iie notice of violation hiolzbeemlemedied, subject 10 new I, testing that is :now being contemplay. In additionihe Borough would like to have assurance that ,-tfiltur e violations will\ not be permitted to o.,0111uwithout an immediate shutdown. While the ADEC replation`g may pro,vicle a timeTrame W cure air quality violatio4, the -s---,,,.75.,-." Borough's performance standards do not-mention such a ' grace period". Under theZoning, a violation is a violation when it occurs. Just as the Borough presumes that ADEC approval means the performance standards MAY be met, we similarly view a NOV as evidence that a zoning violation HAS occurred. Please contact this office at your earliest convenience so that we may schedule an administrative hearing to go over these issues prior to re-instating ZCP BZ-02-061. This meeting may include the Borough Manager or other counsel as determined to be appropriate. You may request to have other participants at the meeting as well, including ADEC officials or your own counsel. In order to expedite the hearing process, it is would be best to schedule the hearing after the latest round of tests have been completed and the results approved by ADEC. This will minimize the need to delay making a decision to resolve this suspension. Please give the Community Development Department a call to schedule this meeting as soon as you have written documentation that the NOV has been resolved with ADEC. N:\CD\Soil Remediation\SPI Revocation.docl 1/5/02 Page 2 of 3 I apologize for any inconvenience this may cause, however, the Department believes this to be a prudent course of action to ensure the health, safety and general welfare of surrounding community. If you have any questions about the process prior to setting up the hearing please give me a call at your convenience. Sincerely, Duane. Dvorak, Director Cc: Borough Manager, Mayor and Assembly Members Brechan Enterprises, Inc., Landowner Tom Chappel, Director, Air and Water Quality, ADEC Bob Cannon, Supervisor Air Quality Compliance, ADEC Paul Horwath, Spill Prevention and Response, ADEC Martin Lydick, Borough Enforcement Officer File. Attachments: None. Enclosures: None./ N: \CD\Soil Remediation\SPI Revocation.docl 1 /5/02 Page 3 of 3 Kodiak Island Borough Community Development Department 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Phone (907) 486-9363 Fax (907) 486-9396 www.kib.co.kodiak.ak.us CeArA-lcrt0 George Cline Jennie D. Sharpe Soil Processing Inc. 207 E. Northern Lights Blvd., Suite 103A Anchorage, AK 99503 November 5, 2002 Re: Suspension of Kodiak Island Borough Zoning Compliance Permit BZ-02-061, pending review of recent violation of air quality standards regulated by the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC). Dear Mr. Cline and Ms. Sharpe: We are in receipt of the Notice of Violation (NOV) issued by ADEC on October 29, 2002. In that correspondence, it is indicated that the soil remediation facility operated by Soil Processing Inc. (SPI) did violate certain air quality standards on or about September 6, 2002. In addition, further violations may have been occurring in the intervening time between September 6, 2002 and the date that SPI voluntarily halted processing operations as a result of the NOV issued by ADEC. As we have discussed previously, the Kodiak Island Borough (KM) relies on the air quality standards promulgated and enforced by ADEC in order to provide a reasonable assurance to the public that the performance standards of the I-Industrial zone, specifically KIBC 17.24.060.D and E, will be met. The Department has received a number of air quality complaints during this period of time, relating to both the soil processing use and the asphalt batch plant operated by Brechan Enterprises. Given the recent letters issued by ADEC in late September indicating that both uses were in compliance with ADEC requirements, the Department was still considering its response to those complaints. In light of more recent events, however, the Department hereby SUSPENDS ZONING COMPLIANCE PERMIT BZ-02-061, pending an administrative hearing with the Department to go over the facts related to this air quality violation as it relates to the Borough's Tndustrial zone performance standards. In addition, the permit may not be reinstated until qualified testing indicates that the soil processing use may resume with a reasonable assurance that the air quality standards promulgated and enforced by ADEC will be met. Because the Industrial zoning performance standards are based on subjective assessment criteria, the Department has in the past always deferred to ADEC standards, which are quantitative and measurable. It has always been presumed that the measurable standards enforced by ADEC would be violated long before the more subjective performance standards set forth in the Borough code would be exceeded. When Borough staff has responded to complaints, there has been no reasonable way to reconcile field observations made with the testing and approvals previously granted by ADEC. We are concerned by the apparent conflicting information issued by ADEC and by the amount of time that has been permitted to pass from the time the violation occurred until the time that it was identified and acted upon. It is appreciated that SPI has agreed to voluntarily stop soil processing operations until the facility can undergo maintenance and new testing. The Borough however, feels that until this violation is resolved that the zoning compliance permit will remain in suspension until the operator receives written notice that the notice of violation has been remedied, subject to new testing that is now being contemplated. In addition, the Borough would like to have some assurance that future violations will not be permitted to occur without an immediate shutdown. While the ADEC regulations may provide a time frame to cure air quality violations, the Borough's performance standards do not mention such a "grace period". Under the zoning, a violation is a violation when it occurs. Just as the Borough presumes that ADEC approval means the performance standards MAY be met, we similarly view a NOV as evidence that a zoning violation HAS occurred. Please contact this office at your earliest convenience so that we may schedule an administrative hearing to go over these issues prior to re-instating ZCP BZ-02-061. This meeting may include the Borough Manager or other counsel as determined to be appropriate. You may request to have other participants at the meeting as well, including ADEC officials or your own counsel. In order to expedite the hearing process, it is would be best to schedule the hearing after the latest round of tests have been completed and the results approved by ADEC. This will minimize the need to delay making a decision to resolve this suspension. Please give the Community Development Department a call to schedule this meeting as soon as you have written documentation that the NOV has been resolved with ADEC. I apologize for any inconvenience this may cause, however, the Department believes this to be a prudent course of action to ensure the health, safety and general welfare of surrounding community. If you have any questions about the process prior to setting up the hearing please give me a call at your convenience. Sincerely, Duane Dvorak, Director Cc: Borough Manager, Mayor and Assembly Members Brechan Enterprises, Inc., Landowner Tom Chappel, Director, Air and Water Quality, ADEC Bob Cannone, Supervisor Air Quality Compliance, ADEC - Paul Horwath, Spill Prevention and Response, ADEC Martin Lydick, Borough Enforcement Officer ‘e.(tt& Wit(c.;,„ ainv,k 6 Cc 375-5- Cayegivc,_ 417') cPvcdcor 995-d/ FROM : Carver Geologic Kodiak Alaska FAX NO.�D: 907 487 4002 11 /UUUL 1u:an EAA. 9+77+" °alb' STAci OF bum DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION DIVISION OF AIR AND WATER QUALITY - AIR PERMITS PROGRAMS George Cline Soil Processing, Inc 207 E. Northern Lights, 103 -A Anchorage, AK 99501 Nov. b1 di:31:U 10.14nn Z002 r TONY KNOWLES, GOVERNOR • 555 Cordova Sneer . Aacnosaga, AK 99501-2617 PROM (907) 269.7577 PAX: 1907) 269 -7508 htir 1Jarwto • •k 1n/dcd Certified Mail 7099 3400 0016 8435 0368 turn Receipt Requested October 29, 2002 Re: Notice of Violation for FJtceedance of the Particulate Matter (PM) Emission Standard. Deer Mr. Cline: ...This letter transmits Notice of Violation (NOV) 2002462E-40 -2495 for exceeding Alaska's . particulate omission standard. 18 AAC 50.055(bX1). This violation occurred on September 6, 2002 during source testing of the soil remed'iation unit (SRLT) at the &edam- Entaprise, Inc property in Bell's Plata on Kodiak Island. The department has received and reviewed source 'test mamas for particle Matter (PM) and Cato, Monoxide (CO) Relative Accuracy Test Audit (RATA) of Qtr soil refine iia on unit performed on Sepm nber.6, 200,1. Issues concerning the RATA 1,411 be followed up at a later date. Soil Processing Inc (SP's) wee autlseaized to operate the SRU under the General Pernik No. 4 . on October 7. 1998. Pkmtir condition 11.2. states PM misdates from the druni dryer, rotary kiln and afterburner at the facility may not exceed 0.05 grains per dry'ctandard cubic tear (grilled) of etctwast coaected to standard conditions for a ammo which commenced operation affix July 1972. Our'reeords show this SRU commenced operation in 1991. During source test conducted an September 6.2002, the SRU demonstrated a-3-hour average particulate emission eoneeagation-af 0.11 gridsef, a violation of permit cone tion 112 and 18 AAC 50.055(b)(1). . To resolve this violation. the Department requests that SPI submit a compliance plan by November 8, 2002. This compliance plan shall provide details and dates for demonstrating that the SRU complies with the 0.05 gr/dsef emission standard, along with measures to be taken to reinitiate emissions The epigram plan is subject to department approval. If you have any queations,.please contact me at (9 7) 269 -7574. Sincerely. ' Beverley Diann Environmental Engineer Associate cc: • !toned Cantrone, AADEC /App, paitbank9 ADEC!APP Face, Arrbcra;e 900.16.052 .ti Bartholomew. ADECISCLT ADBCIAPP filer. Jun.... APOOOzoa Clrnn Air run. Iv.. FROM Carver Geologic Kodiak Alaska FAX NO • 907 4E1 417ac • .L# vat Vr iV. J. tAL VW - l'J! ANC AVi0 F9l�s BEFORE THE STA.TE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF RNVTRONMENTAL CONSERVATION In the Matter of Soil Processing, Inc • 207 E. Northern Lights, 103 -A.. !'horage, Alaska 99503 . NOTICE OF VIOLATION #2002-626.40 -2495 The State of Alaska, Department of Buriaonmental Conservation (the Depart: wait) issues this Notice of violetio* (NOV) to Soil Processing, Inc (S,1 ) for operating exceeding the OAS grains per dry standard cubic foot (grldscf) is violation of 18 AAC 5O.055(b)(1). Findings and C.onclusions:. . 1. WI (FACILTY) owns and operates soil !mediation unit (MU) a transportable source that is currently teemed in Bells Plan on Kodiak Island 2.. The FACILITY'S maximum process qty is 12 tomtits. and is classified as as ambk= • air quality facility as defined in 18 AAC 50300(ax1). 3. The FACILITY has beam issued autho izaaon to operate under General Permit (GP) No, 4 on October 7. 1998. a. The PACII.ITY is coquiredw conduct a source test ones every five years as required by permit condition M21. • 5. The FACILITY previous scarce test was cuncbicted on July 25. 1996, which demonstrated compliance with the particular,. mattcr•etmiaaioa standard. 6. The FACII ITY conducted a sou= sot= teat on September 6, 2002. Mr average of tba three cue -bo+u suns was 0.11 gddscf at a production race of 11.9 taus/hour. This exceeds the 0.05 gains per dry standard cubic foot (&ddscf) standard-stipulated in 18 AAC 50.055(bX1). . Penalties for the above alleged violations can.be quite severe_ In a civil aeon, a parson who violates or causes or permits to be viatica a provision cf a statute or segelation or permit is liable to the State for a sum to be assessed by the court of not leas than $500, nor more than $100,000 for the initial violation, nor mote than $10,000 for each day thereafter on which she violation continues. AS 46.03.760(4 In a criminal action, a person may be forted guilty of a Class A misdemeanor. AS 46.03.790. Upon conviction, a defendant. who is not an organization. may be seam:se d to pay a fine not exceeding $10,000 and/or sentenced to a definite teen of imprisonment of not more than one year. Upon conviction, a defendant that is as ar$112iZatxenn may be sentenced to pry a fine not exceeding the steam of $200, 000, an amount two time the pecuniary gain realized by the defendant as a result of tbe offense, or an amount two tunes the peavniary damage or loss caused by the defends= to another or to tbe ptopeaty of another as a result of FRO : Garver Geologic Kodiak Alaska FAX NO. : 907 487 4002 111U1 Fia 907,' -167 DEC AWQ FBFS Nov. 01 dOUd lfo. 17t9-' 1"T 01C04 the offense. AS 12.5S,035(c). Bach day of violation may be considered a separate violaaou. Alaska law allows the State to pursue causes of action =currently. To coazoct the violarion(a) described above, the Dept inquests that, prior to November 8, 2002, SPI submit a compliance plan, which provides derails and dates for deuroaettat!ng that the SRU complies with the 0.05 grid3cf ea n& ion standard In addition; the Department requests that the plan include measures SPI will taiga to minimize emissions until the unit is in full compliance. Noc..ing in this Notice shall be construed as a waiver of the State$ sntharky to seek or as an agreement on the part of the State to forego judicial or administtative enforcement of the above - described violation or to seek recovery of damages and penalties or injunctive relief, as psesaabed by law. ' In addition, nothing beicin shall be construed, as a wai er of enforcement nt forpast, present, or lotus violations not specifically act forth herein. Beverley I2.'i'Hams Bnvircmmcntai Engineer Associate _) Personally Sewed._ - Q) Sent by Certified Mail #7099 3400 8435 0968 On the 291' day of Octobtr, 2002 Fn In WP Pat Carlson From: Jim Wells Uwells@ptialaska.net] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:14 PM To: Pat Carlson Cc: Judi Nielsen Subject: email from Alan Austerman-SPI air quality compliance From: Senator Alan Austerman <Senator_Alan_Austerman@legis.state.ak.us> Organization: Alaska State Legislature Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:25:29 -0900 To: "Chapple, Tom" <tom_Chapple@envircon.state.ak.us>, Robert P Cannone <bob_cannone@envircon.state.ak.us> Cc: "Brown, Michele" <Michele_Brown@envircon.state.ak.us>, Randall E Lucas <randy_ludas@envircon.state.ak.us>, James Frechione <jim frechione@envircon.state.ak.us?., Paul D Horwath <paul_horwath@envircon.state.ak.us>, Clip <cliff_stone@legis.state.ak.us>, spialaska@aol.com, ddvorak@kib.co.kodiak.ak, kodiak_lio@legis.state.ak.us Subject: Re:air emissions at SPI facility in Kodiak Mr. Chapple and Mr. Cannone, I do not have a copy of Commissioner Brown's October 2, 2002 letter. Please fax that to me at the Kodiak office attn: Senator Austerman (486-5264). In addition, please fax that to my aide in Juneau attn: Cliff Stone (465-4956). I would appreciate this ASAP. I find your email somewhat disconcerting. I have been lead to believe all along that this=akte-was in-compliance-with-the-epprOpriate-diZ-a447watea=_ quality reguiatibns and permitting for.this facility. Hearing thisabout the air non-compliance... I would hope that the water quality aspects of this operation comform to the appropriate regs and permits. I would also appreciate a full report on why the SPI facility does not comply with the specific limits you refer to. Additionally, I want to see the plan for resolving this matter as soon as it is available. I would also like to review all documents in regards to the testing that is required of the operator as well as how many times DEC will actively be monitoring this facility. You may send all of this via email or as you see fit. This is a serious matter. I'm a life long resident of Kodiak. I know how the air can just sometimes "hang" in the Bells Flats area. We have fought dust control for many years before paving was completed this summer on the Chiniak Highway. I also find it somewhat upsetting that concerned citizens from Bells Flats have brought a variety of concerns to DEC in recent weeks, only to be told in no uncertain terms that everything is okay. That DEC should be trusted ..because they have been doing this kind of work a long time. I will keep an open mind on this, but since this revelation has come forward.. I will be somewhat skeptical until all the "i's are dotted and the T's are crossed." Thank you for bringing this to my attention. Sincerely, Alan "Chapple, Tom" wrote: Senator Austerman and Representative Stevens:I want to provide you withan update to Commissioner Brown's October 2, 2002, letter concerning the soil treatment facility currently operating in the Bell Flats area of Kodiak. In that letter, Commissioner Brown indicated that preliminary test results indicated air emissions fz the treatment unit complied wi' standards. The t official test results werejust recently received.We have reviewed the report and determined that emissions. do not comply with the specific out -of- .stack emission limits set in regulation and also included in the air quality permit for this facility. This is a problem which we currently taking measures to correct. We have issued a Notice of Violation to the facility operators and requested a plan for both minimizing emissions and bringing the facility into compliance. If you have further questions, Bob Cannone is my lead compliance person responsible for making sure the problem is resolved. -He can be reached in Fairbanks at 451 -2133 or via email at bob _cannone@@envircon.state.ak.us. You may also contact me at 269 -7634. Tom Chapple, Director, Air & Water Quality Division Nov 01 02. 12:1Sp FROM : Carver Geologic Kodiak Alaska FAX NO. : 907 487 4002 ii;(11/02 10;40 tAi SPII Inc. Summary Report Particulate Testing 90 :BS -3921 p.1 Nov. 01 2002 11:07Prl P2 Prepared for: SPI, inc. 207 E. Northern Lights Anchorage, AK 99503 Prepared by: Alaska Source Testing, LLC 620 W 55m, Unit A Anchorage, Alaska 99518 October 14, 2002 D ECEOWEIni NOV -12002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Nov 01 02 12:19p JA ILP /WIC FROM : Carver Geologic godiak Alaska FAX NO. : 907 497 4002 11 /U11VL Au. .70 PAS auriJ1 :1VI taws', nIII 'WHO Rusty G ®Stn State of Alaska DEC Division of Alr & Water Quality 610 University Avenue Fairbanks. AK 95708.3643 Sty. .486 -3921 p• 2 Nov. 01 2002 11:08AM 3 .elwr� vw 1,-DCF SIr1 - i IC✓RPLR.AI:•1' :a Ci: f n October 17, 2002 ca `sv3' Dear Ma. C3esin, RE: Particulate Emissions Source Telst Attached please find two copies of the Particulate Matter source test for Soli Processing lnc.'e (SP ») soil remediation unit. SPI burley= that the high particulate readings aro due to the size of our pond It is the only major change from previous year of operations. This year due to area constraints the pored was constructed 45' x 30' by 7' deep whereas in the past the size wee 60' x 40' x 4' deep. We believe that Ih9 fines did not hove time to settle In the pond. During operations the steam plums has always remained white. Visible 1=miss ens reeding* have remained zero. As of October 15. 2002, SP) will process ''A the amount of their permitted 12 tone per hour. WO wile maintain this production rate until the Sad of flits season. in the Spring of 2003, a new pond wilt be consbucted to the old dimensions. Within 2 - 3 weeks of 100% rapacity production Mesita Source 'resting will again conduct a particulate emissions source test. Should you have any question or need further Information, please do not hasitate to contact either George Cline or myself. BMOC on Information ar4 belief famed after aaeonable inquiry, t certify that the statements end Information In and attached to this document are true, accurate, and complete. Sincerely, ...�- "" "`•:: • Jennie D. Sherpa` f y SL2c. bent 0-4 ' 4Ntptur j � PLJBL'C'- A. • r�r ,. Imo• rJ J „i :� .. �•'�'ICrI•• nc. .,'ar'•i :. a :4' :'.� .3, 1'•^ :�..:�.1+ e rr:;;;. ' -";();" _. •ti. .t 4 • '°w' : -`y_1.•19i Nov 01 02 12:19p IR ILP/WIC 90- 1 3921 p. 3 FROM : Carver Geologi c Kodiak Alaska FRX M1 . 907 487 4002 Nov. Ell 2002 11:06rin P4 wva, V6. 141••■■• WWI 111,40/.... Alaska Source 'Testing &Pi. Inc, September 20.:42 1. INTRODUCTION SPI inc., Soil Processing Incorporated, operates a soil rernedia4jon unit that is currwitty located In Kodiak, Alaska. To coir.ply with conditions in general operating permit (Qp-4) number ,4A000204, SPI Inc. engaged Alaska Source Testing, LLC (AST) to perform a source test. The testing consisted of measuring total particulate (PM) in the exhaust gases of the unit. AST performed the emission tearing on September 6, 2002. All procedures used during the particulate testing were conducted in accordance with USEPA Reference Methods as prescribed in 40 CFR 60. Appendix A: specifically methods 1, 2, 3A, 4, and S. A visual surveillance was performed in accordance with USEPA Method 9. Bill Hudson was project manager and on-site team leader. Terry Steiner. SP1. performed a 30- minute opacity surveillance and collected operafional data. Bill Hudson performed 8-minute opacay surveillance readings coinciding with each test run. Testing consisted of three, one-hour runs. This document Provides 9 sumsnary report of the ernisslOn testing results. 2. SUMMARY OF RESULTS 2.1.Perticulate Test Resu The results of sample runs ars presented in Table 2-1. Table 2-1 Summary of Particulate Test Restate Particulate i Run Process Rate Matter i TPH 1 1 0.106 I 11.9 —7-1 2 0.108 i 12.0 3 0.105 l 11.8 1 i Avert_22,:uLII.9 • __ j igriscf = grains per standard cubic foot of exhaust gas 2.2. VISUAL SURVEILLANCE Visua! surveillance observations were performed in accordance with USEPA Memel 9 and were conducted by Terry Steiner on September 6, 20C2. The field data sheets aro Included in Appendix B. The average opacity that was observed during the 30-minute period was 0%. Nov 01 02 12:20p I; �R ILP /WIC SC'M.JF86 -3921 p.4 FROM : Carver Geologic Kodiak Alaska FAX NO. : 907 487 4002 Nov. 01 2002 11:08AM P5 Ll'vl+us 111.4!. rat Ly■97LLLO1 4UGL 16ki rel13 :1 WOUU5,14.1 Alaska Source Testing 3. SOURCE DESCRIPTION SPI. inc. September. 2002 Sail Processing Inc,'s soil remediation unit (SRU) is used for vesting petroleum contaminated soils. The SRU is rated at 12 tons per hour. The SRU is equipped with a PowerC1otierli Model PC5 =22 wet scrubber system and a SOI1 TEK"" Model 300 afterburner to control emissions. 4. SAMPLE LOCATION AND TRAVERSE METHODOLOGY The SRU 16 -inch exhaust stack is equipped with two three -inch ports oriented 90 degrees apart. The ports are located approximately 40 inches downstream and 22 inches upstream of the nearest disturbance. Bill Hudson verified that the ports met Method 1 siting criteria prior to testing. Figure 4 -1 shows the cross - sectional area of stank at She sample location. The measurements for the traverse points are provided an the figure. 6. OPERATIONS AND TESTING CONDITIONS Please refer to Appendix E for copies of the unit log sheets during the tests. r eun 1 ! , 2 3 Soil Feed Rate ffPH) 11.9 12 1 11.8 Particulate Coritrzti 1-k0 FJow Rate (gatlmin) 2.5 2.5 25 Pressure DA ro across Scrubber (In. 1120) ! 3.6 — 3.75" 3.5 —4" Wader Flow Rate (gal/mint 1 100 1 100 1 oo . Make -up H2O Flow Rate, recycled 140 (gaVmiri) ; 300 i 300 1 300 Percent of fines less than 200 were 7%. Pond is 35 x 45 x 7 feet with a 10 mill liner, 6. TEST PROCEDURES AND APPARATUS The individual test procedures used during this testing program were conducted in aced dance with U.S. EPA Reference Methods as prescribed in 40 CFR 60, Appendix A. The specific methods are listed below. Method 1 Sample and velocity traverses for stationary sources Method 2 Detemiir.atlon of stack gas velocity and volumetric flow rate (Type 5 Pitot tube) Method 3A Determination of oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations In emissions from stationary sources (Instrumental Analyzer Procedure) Method 4 Determination of moisture content in stack gases Method 5 Determination of particulate emissions from stationary. sources Method 9 Visual determination of the opacity of emissions from stationary sources 2 Duane Dvorak From: Erin Whipple Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:01 PM To: Duane Dvorak Cc: Pat Carlson; Martin Lydick Subject: Soil Remediation plant Sgt. Hughes with the Troopers called to discuss noise complaints they have received in their office. Apparently they received a complaint last night of shots fired in that area so they sent a trooper out. They could find no evidence of shots fired and the complainant had the trooper listen to the noise from the plant. They had received complaints prior to this but had not had a trooper respond. Anyway, the trooper felt the noise was somewhat loud. George told them that we had taken readings and that they were in compliance with the noise levels currently required by the I -zone. I reiterated that we had taken readings, with the highest being around 77, and that the zone did require Tess than 90 decibels. Sgt Hughes said that the state statute that covers this is their disorderly conduct statute and it is kind of open ended.. It reads that a person is in violation if the noise is determined to be louder than what a normal person would consider reasonable. He said that if they are called again and found to be in violation of this statute they would be issued a cease and desist order. If they didn't comply with that they would be issued a summons. I also told Sgt. Hughes that we have received complaints as well, and that Duane was working on a draft ordinance for noise violations in response to the complaints, but that it would have to go through an approval process to be adopted. If you have any questions for Sgt. Hughes he can be reached at 486 -4121. Erin Whipple, Secretary ?odiakIsrand Borough Community Development Department (907) 486 -9363 1 Duane Dvorak From: Jack or Shari Doyle [redgate@ptialaska.neti Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 8:07 PM To: Duane Dvorak Cc: BenYWi|lstein Wayne Stevens; Tuck Bonney; Robin Heinrichs; Pat Branson; Greg Razo Gabrielle LeDoux; Jim & Nancy Wells Subject: SPI EMMISSIONS IN VIOLATION OF KIBC 17.24.060(d)(e) Duane. Please consider this email a com lain regarding regarding the emssions from the SPI facility. 1 assume that you are aware that DEC has found SPI to be n violation of their air permitting. Nonetheless SPI was still up and running when 1 went to work this morning and again or stiU when 1 retuned home after 5 PM and took the attached photos of the facility in o eration As you can see "brown" emissions bellowing from the facility (Iooks like th aaing themselves). This stuff floats through the air and hangs for an unnatural period over our valley and leaves obnoxious odors in its wake. Please note that the plume is drifting toward our home which unfortunately absorbs the constituent smells of the particular dirt recipe being cooked off at that time. I can not relate how frustrated we are with this situation of so-call legal pollution let alone bombardment of illegal pollution. In this regard your aftention is invited to the aforementioned sections of the KB code. Clearly, the attached photos document violations of KIBC 17.24.060 (E). And I am further stating that the associated odors emitting with the plume are obnoxious in nature and are a violation of KIBC 17.24.060 (D). Moreover, SPI violation of DEC air permitting is a simultaneous violation of the provision of the zoning compUance issued by the Community Development Department and should result in the immediate withdrawal of their zoning compliance. Frustratedly yours, Jack Doyle SPI 5.57PM Oct SPI 5.53PM Oct 31.jpg 31.jpg Page 1 of 1 file: / /C:\Documents and Settings \ddvorak\Local Settings \Temporary Interne... \SPI 5.53PM Oct 31.jp 11/1/2002 Page 1 of 1 AIL ,ESSING file: / /C:1Documents and Settings\ddvorak\Local Settings\Temporary Interne...1SPI 5.57PM Oct 31.jp 11/1/2002 FROM .SOILPRO DATE: TIME TO FRX NO. :9072749295 SOIL PROCESSING INC. 207 E, NORTHERN LIGHTS BLVD., SUITE 103A ANCHORAGE, AK 99503 trA ArL �6 35 AK FAX TRANSMITTAL LETTER tVrn2A IC. v. 01 2002 11 :44RM P1 FROM: Telephone (907) 274 -3000 Fax (907) 274 -9295 CONFIRM RECEIPT: _ __YES NO TRANSMITTING _iPAGES INCLUNDING COVER LETTER. RZMARKS' FROM :SOILPRO MX NO. :9072749295 Nov. 01 2002 11:45RM P2 Page 1 of 1 'Subj: ©EC's actions to remedy Mr emissions problem at SPI facility in Kodiak Date: 1111102 8:59:47 AM Alaskan Standard Time :From: lom F.hagpletatenvirco0State.ak =us to: 4enator Alan Austerman@legissjate,ak.us, Representative Gary Stevens€sleais state.a *sus 'CC: Jim Frechione ©pnviroonstate.ak•us, Paul Holvtaih2Aenvirco i.gate,ak.us, tic ff s[otleplepls.statri,ak.us, snialaskegaoi.com, dQyorakekibteo,Kodialcak, )rodiak IioCa:leats state_ak al, 41 Baum rtner enyircon.state ak us, (lob Cannonegf envirco0,Mate.ak.us File: SPI.doc (80928 bytes) Dl Time (44000 bps): < 1 minute :Sent hem the Internet (.Details) Senator Austerman and Representative Stevens: I will be giving your offices a call as soon as possible this morning to converse with you or your staff about what actions have now been taken to remedy the high air emissions at the SPI facility. The attached press release was issued this am and hopefully an article on this subject will appear shortly In the Kodiak paper. In a nutshell, we called the operator and convinced them to shut clown their operation until repairs and maintenance are done such that the unit Is demonstrated to meet the state emissions standards. Normal operations will not resume until we gel lab results showing that the unit operates In full compliance with the air quality emission limits. Further, we will have an inspector In Kodiak when the re- testing Is done next week. We have been pleased by the response of the operator thus far and we intend to diligently monitor the repair and testing work to make sure the unit meets requirements upon re- start. We also intend to keep the public and your offices apprised of developments as this corrective action proceeds Tom Chappte Director, Air & Water Quality, DEC Friday, November 01, 2002 America Online: SPIALASICA FROM .50ILPR0 FRX NO. :9072749295 Nov. 01 2002 11:45RM P3 DECNEWS RELEASE Alaska Department of Environmarual Conservation 335 Cordova St, Anchorage, AS 99507 Phone: (907) 2694283 Far: 269 -7308 wwwstataakus/dect For more information, contact Tom C6apple, Director, Air and Water Quality at (907) 269 -7634 or Bob Cenoone at (907)451 -2133 November 1,2002 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Soil Processing Inc. (SPI) voluntarily ceases operations DEC finds Kodiak facility out of compliance with Alaska Air Quality Standards Kodiak - -The SPI soil remediation facility has voluntarily shut down its operations in light of test results showing out -of -stack emissions to be greater than Alaska air quality regulation limits. "As soon as DEC received the results, we called the operator of the SPI facility and asked if he would immediately shut down operations pending corrective actions to reduce emissions," saki Tom Chapple, Director of DEC's Division of Air and Water Quality. The plant owner is undertaking repairs and maintenance immediately and has scheduled a re -test of emissions to begin Monday, November 4. The plant will not resume normal operations until new test results show the sail remediation unit meets the State standards. Last month, based on preliminary results, DEC indicated that the facility was meeting state standards. However, the more detailed lab tests received late last week conclusively found that stack emissions were twice the allowed state standard for airborne particles in the exhaust gases. There is no evidence that either ground or surface water has been impacted by the soil treatment facility. Samples have been collected from nearby Lake Orbin, which showed no contamination. According to DEC, the facility has complied with its operations plan and there is no evidence of a release, spill or accident at the site. -MORE- FROM :SDILPRO FAX NO. :9072749295 Nov. 01 2002 11:46RM P4 DEC will continue to work closely with the operator to take corrective action and be sure the plant is operated in a way that meets and continues to meet all air quality requirements. Kodiak residents will be kept informed as corrective work proceeds. "DEC is committed to ensuring the protection oFthe public's health," Chapple said. "We're grateful to the community and individual residents of Kodiak who have diligently expressed concern about the air quality conditions. We look forward to working with the public, Kodiak's legislators, and the Borough to resolve this important mutter." 40- Kodiak Island Borough State of Alaska Dept. of Environmental Conservation Contaminated Site Program 43335 Kalifornsky Beach Road, Suite 11 Soldotna, AK 99669 Attn: Paul Horwath Community Development Department 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Phone (907) 486 -9363 Fax (907) 486 -9396 www.kib.co.kodiak.ak.us Re: Application for Operation of a Contaminated Soil Remediation Facility at the Brechan Industrial Site. (Tract A, Block 3, Bells Flats Alaska Subdivision) Dear Mr. Horwath: The Kodiak Island Borough Community Development Department would like to echo the sentiments of other borough residents by requesting an extension of the review period for the above referenced request. The initial review period, which is scheduled to run out at the close of business today (May 22, 2002), has not provided an adequate period of time for local residents to comment on this issue. As we discussed in our telephone conversation last week, the Kodiak community has only recently become aware of this request and many residential property owners in the vicinity of the proposed facility are still attempting to obtain information and make informed comments about the proposed use. The borough also recommends that you consider holding an informational meeting here in Kodiak, to answer questions and hear local comments in person. You may find it more effective to have a meeting in the community in order to answer questions in one place at one time, rather than responding to a large number of telephone contacts and written questions /comments. The borough can provide a venue for such a meeting at no cost, subject to advance scheduling and availability. Historically, borough staff has always tried to coordinate with ADEC on issues of air and water quality that are beyond the ability, jurisdiction and expertise of borough staff to enforce. This has become more challenging over the years as ADEC no longer maintains a presence in the community. This makes it harder for borough staff and the public to obtain timely information from the agency, which has had the effect of reducing the public's faith in the department's ability to adequately enforce state environmental regulations. FILE COP1 Paul Horwath, ADEC May 22, 2002 Page 2 of 2 In some cases, where a use can meet ADEC regulations, subject to the operation of equipment or processes within certain specifications, it is not clear to the public how ADEC would monitor such operations to know if an air, soil or water quality violation were to occur. This concern is is made stronger by the fact that ADEC does not have a presence in the Kodiak community. The Kodiak Island Borough Community Development Department could work with your office to disseminate information related to this request, and related to other ADEC functions in general. We are not, however, able to interpret statutes and regulations of a technical nature that ADEC is tasked with administering and enforcing. Included with this letter is a vicinity map showing the zoning around the proposed soil remediation site. A copy of the Industrial zoning district standards applicable to the proposed site are also attached. The site has historically been used for asphalt batching, resource extraction and other related uses. While the Industrial zone has certain performance standards, it is likely that air quality standards may be violated long before the air quality is noticeable enough to be enforced under our non - technical standards. For this reason, we will not issue a zoning compliance permit for this use until ADEC has reviewed and approved an operation plan that meets the environmental standards of the State of Alaska. If you have any questions about the historical operation of the site we would be happy to make our department files available for your inspection. Please let us know if there is anything additional we can do to assist you with the environmental review process for the pr osed soil remediation use. Sincere 7 Duane Dvorak, Director Community Development Department C.C. Pat Carlson, Kodiak Island Borough Manager Kodiak Island Borough Assembly and Mayor KIB Planning and Zoning Commission Brechan Enterprises, Inc. Attached: Bells Flats Zoning Map KIBC 17.24, Industrial Zoning District Return Receipt C.O.D. EXPRESS Pidg MAIL POST OFFICE TO ADDRESSEE EI23820D449US UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE rM ORIGIN (POSTAL USE ONLY) PO ZIP Code Date In Mo. Day Year Day of Delivery Flat Rate Envelope U Next USecond 12 Noon J 3PM Time In Weignt H PM Ibs ozs Milltary ❑ 2nd Day .i 3rd Day Intl Alpha Country Code No Delivery 1 Weekend ❑ Holiday Acceptance Clerk Initials Postage Total Postage & Fees EI2382D0449US SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR SERVICE GUARANTEE AND INSURANCE COVERAGE LIMITS CUSTOMER USE ONLY METHOD OF PAYMENT: Fxpress Mail Corporate Acct No F oderal Agency Acct. No. or Postal Service Acct. No fl WAIVER OF SIGNATURE (Domestic Only): I wish delivery to be made without obtaining signature of addressee or addressee's agent (if delivery employee judges that article can be left in secure location) and I authorize that delivery employee's signature constitutes valid proof of delivery. NO DELIVERY Weekend n Holiday Customer Signature FROM: (PLEASE PRINT) PHONE to r -10 60A4 1?: t . L J TO: (PLEASE PRINT) PHONE r f . a -1 1 5c.� \M iE± t cy SCIA 1001 vsf. 3 pwe sit ti L ctl 50! 1 J FOR PICKUP OR TRACKING CALL 1- 800 - 222 -1811 =Ems Label 11 -B October 1995 Customer Copy 17.24.005 -- 17.24.010 Chapter 17.24 I- INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT Sections: 17.24.005 Description and intent. 17.24.010 Permitted uses. 17.24.020 Conditional uses. 17.24.030 Lot requirements. 17.24.040 Yards. 17.24.050 Building height limit. 17.24.060 Performance standards. 17.24.005 Description and intent. The I- Industrial Zoning District is established as a district in which the principal use of the land is for business, manufacturing, processing, fabricating, repair, assembly, storage, wholesaling, and distributing operations, which may create some nuisance, but which are not properly associated nor compatible with residential land uses. For the industrial zone, in promoting the general purpose of this title, the specific intentions of this chapter are: A. To encourage the construction of and the continued use of the land for business and industrial purposes; B. To prohibit all residential uses of the land not associated with industries and any other land use which would substantially interfere with the development, continuation or expansion of industry in the zone; C. To concentrate the industrial and business uses within designated areas to protect residential districts from noxious or noisy operations; and D. To encourage the discontinuance of existing uses that would not be permitted as new uses under the provisions of this chapter. (Ord. 81 -40 -0 32(part), 1981). 17.24.010 Permitted uses. The following uses of the land are permitted in the industrial district: A. All uses permitted in B- Business District, except residential; B. Aircraft, automobile and truck assembly or remodeling; C. Asphalt batch and mixing plant, manufacturing or refining; D. Assembly of music and vending machines; E. Auction business; F. Beverage manufacturing; G. Boat building, repair and storage; H. Cabinet shops; I. Concrete mixing batch plants; 3. Coal storage yards; K. Dwelling units for a watchman or caretaker on the premises; 17.24.010-17.24.030 L. Dyeing plants; M. Gravel or sand extraction; N. Junkyards, wrecking, salvage or scrap metal operations; 0. Lumber mills and sawmills; P. Lumberyard, building material manufacture or sales; Q. Machine or blacksmith shops; R. Manufacturing, servicing or repair of light consumer goods, such as appliances, batteries, furniture, and garments; S. Metal working or welding shops; T. Motor freight terminals; U. Outdoor storage; V. Paint shops; W. Public uses; X. Rock crushers; Y. Seafood processing establishments and their dormitories; Z. Sewage treatment plants; AA. Slaughterhouses; BB. Steel fabrication shops or yards; CC. Vehicle impound lots; DD. Vocational or trade schools; EE. Utility installations; and FF. Warehousing within an enclosed structure. (Ord. 92-13 37, 1992; Ord. 81-40-0 32(part), 1981). 17.24.020 Conditional uses. The following uses may be permitted by obtaining a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of chapter 17.67 of this title: A. Acetylene gas manufacture or storage; B. Ammonia, bleaching powder or chlorine manufacture; C. Cement, concrete, lime and plaster manufacture; D. Chemical bulk storage and sales; E. Garbage disposal sites, dumps and sanitary landfills; and F. Petroleum or flammable liquid production, refining or storage. (Ord. 81-40-0 32(part), 1981). 17.24.030 Lot requirements. A. Lot area. The minimum lot area required is twenty thousand (20,000) square feet. B. Lot width. The minimum lot width required is seventy-five (75) feet. (Ord. 81-40-0 32(part), 1981). 17.24.040 -- 17.24.060 17.24.040 Yards. A. Front yards. 1. there shall be a front yard of not less than thirty (30) feet. 2. the front yard, when facing a state highway, shall be not less than fifty (50) feet. B. Side yards. 1. there shall be a side yard on each side of a principal building of not less than twenty (20) feet, except that approved fire wall installations between adjoining structures provides for construction on the lot line. C. Rear yards. 1. there shall be a rear yard of not less than twenty (20) feet, except that approved fire wall installations between adjoining structures provides for construction on the lot line. D. Exemptions. Waterfront industries are exempt from the requirements of this section. (Ord. 81 -40 -0 32(part), 1981). 17.24.050 Building height limit. The maximum height of a structure is unrestricted, except that no structure shall interfere with Federal Aviation Administration regulations on airport approach; and provided further, that within fifty (50) feet of any residential district boundary, no portion of any structure shall exceed the height limitations of the residential district. (Ord. 81 -40 -0 32(part), 1981). 17.24.060 Performance standards. All permitted and conditional uses shall comply with the performance standards listed, where applicable, in this section. A. Noise. The noise emanating from a premises used for industrial activities shall be muffled so as to not become objectionable due to intermittent beat, frequency, or shrillness; and where a use adjoins a residential district, the noise loudness measured at the boundary line shall not exceed ninety (90) decibels. B. Lighting. Any lighting shall not be used in a manner which produces glare on public highways and neighboring property. Arc welding, acetylene torch cutting and similar processes shall be performed so as not to be seen outside the property. C. Fire and safety hazards. The storage and handling of inflammable liquids, liquefied petroleum, gases and explosives shall comply with the fire prevention code and all other applicable laws and regulations. Enameling and paint spraying operations shall be permitted when incidental to the principal use and when such operations are contained within a building of two- hour fire- resistive construction. Bulk storage of inflammable liquids below ground shall be permitted if the tank is located no closer to the property line than the greater dimension (diameter, length or height) of the tank. D. Odor. Uses causing the emission of obnoxious odors of any kind and the emission of any toxic or corrosive fumes or gases are prohibited. E. Dust and smoke. Dust and smoke created by industrial operations shall not be exhausted into the air in such a manner as to create a nuisance. 17.24.060 F. Open storage. Any storage shall not be located closer than twenty -five (25) feet to any street right -of -way. Any storage shall be enclosed with a fence acceptable to the commission. Whenever lumber, coal or other combustible material is stored, a roadway shall be provided, graded and maintained from the street to the rear of the property to permit free access for fire trucks at any time. G. Screening. Where an industrial use is adjacent to and within one hundred (100) feet of a residential use or zone, that industry shall provide screening as approved by the commission. (Ord. 81 -40 -0 32(part), 1981). FROM : SOILPRO FAX NO. .9072749295 Nov. 07 2002 10:23AM P1 SOIL PROCESSING INCORPORATED PORTABLE 7HERMAI iJNIrS • 01U ICU) ;ErrvICFS • ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP Rusty Gesin State of Alaska DEC Division of Air & Water Quality 610 University Avenue Fairbanks, AK 99709 -3643 October 17, 2002 Dear Ms. Gesin, RE: Particulate Emissions Source Test Attached please find two'copies of the Particulate Matter source test for Soil Processing Inc.'s (SPI) soil remediation unit. SPI believes that the high particulate readings are due to the size of our pond. It is the only major change from previous years of operations. This year due to area constraints the pond was constructed 45' x 30' by 7' deep whereas in the past the size was 60' x 40' x 4' deep. We believe that the fines did not have time to settle in the pond. During operations the steam plume has always remained white. Visible Emissions readings have remained zero. As of October 16, 2D02, SPI will process % the amount of their permitted 12 tons per hour. We will maintain this production rate until the end of this season. In the Spring of 2003, a new pond will be constructed to the old dimensions. Within 2 3 weeks of 100% capacity production Alaska Source Testing will again conduct a particulate emissions source test. Should you have any questions or need further information, please do not hesitate to contact either George Cline or myself. Based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, I certify that the statements and information in and attached to this document are true, accurate, and complete. SAN-. 0-'6— %%4: ir4 aaCi ' ZOL2 �./ z OF N I ;6 SC 207 E. Northern Lights Blvd., Suite 103A • Anchorage, AK 99503 Telephone (907) 274 -3000 FAX (907) 274 -9295 MOM : SOILPRO FAX NO. : 9072749295 SOIL PROCESSING INCORPORATED Nov. 07 2002 1223M P3 PORTABLE THERMAL UNITS • OILFIELD SERVICES • DIVRONMENTAL CLEANUP Rusty Gesin State of Alaska DEC Division of Air & Water Quality 610 Fairbanks Avenue Fairbanks, AK 99709-3643. October 17, 2002 Dear Ms, Gesin, RE: RATA Testing Attached please find two copies of the GEMS RATA report for SoiI Processing Inc.'s (SPI) soil remediation unit. Based on information and belief formed after reasonable Inquiry, I certify that the statements and information in and attached to this document are true, accurate, and complete. 01N-14„, nnie D, Sharpe CEO Cc: 0111 Hudson, AST Randy Lucas, ADEC ...... Ae„,c13•03seeci "cf,:.° • ":0 it4OTA Ry•.:**.Oce, cittioei i.200Z , %PUBLIC • 1ijj OF AV '1 ?tAle,(ic tbsAto4 e_szyww_olsiwl EAPliceo 4 2.1o5 207 E. Northern Lights Blvd., Suite 103A • Anchorage, AK 99503 Telephone (907) 274-3000 FAX (907) 274-9295 Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Fiats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274 -3000 Stockpile Number: Job 4 Stkp #2 Tonnage: 500 tons Ending Treatment Date: 10 -1 -02 To 10 -6 -02 Sampled By: J. Fabiano Origination of Soil: Jacobs ADA, cell 11 This report outlines the findings of third party sampling as permitted by Paul Horwath, P.E. of ADEC. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for the treated soil stockpile as directed by the Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. The samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently: One analytical sample was collected from the location showing the highest PID reading. The cooler was shipped to.Analytica of Anchorage Alaska (ADEC Certification UST -014). Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. The500 -ton stockpiles will be separated into 3 individual stockpiles, which aid in sampling and will carrythe same number. Sample Collection: Sample PE) Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI 4 -2 1 -1 5,1 ND PQL 0.010 0.013 PQL 0.010 0.024 PQL 0,020 SPI 4 -2 1 -2 5.9 SPI 4 -2 1 -3 5.6 SPI 4-2 2 -1 6.9 SPI 4 -2 2 -2 6.3 SPI 4 -2 2 -3 6.0 SPI 4 -2 3 -1 7.3 SPI 4 -2 3 -2 8.1 Yes 950 am A0210043 -01 SPI 4 -2 3 -3 6.5 Analytical .Results; Samples were analyzed for GRO, DRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from Anaiytica and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non - detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location DRO (100 mg/kg) GRO (50 mg/kg) RRO (2000mg/kg) 260 PQL 8.5 SPI 4 -2 3 -2 12 PQL 4.3 ND PQL 2.2 ND PQL 0.010 0.013 PQL 0.010 0.024 PQL 0,020 Volatile Results Sample ID Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene (4,8 mg/kg) Xylene (69 mg/kg) SPI 4 -2 3 -2 0.011 PQL 0.010 ND PQL 0.010 0.013 PQL 0.010 0.024 PQL 0,020 2 Post Treatment Go p in and Analysis Report Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274 -3000 Stockpile Number: Job #4 stockpile #1 Tonnage: 500 tons Ending Treatment bate: Sampled By: J. Fabaino Origination of Soil: Jacobs, ADA, Cell 11 This report outlines the findings of third party sampling as permitted by Paul Horwath, P.E. of ADEC. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for the treated soil stockpile as directed by the Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. The samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. One analytical sample was collected from the location showing the highest PID: reading. The cooler was shipped to Analytica of Anchorage Alaska (ADEC Certification UST - 014). Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. The 500 -ton stockpiles will be separated into 3 individual stockpiles, which aid in sampling and will carry the same number. Sample nomenclature: Example: 5PI 15 -2 -3 SPI - for Soil Processing, 15 - for the stockpile number, 2 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 3 - for sample location in that specific pile. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results from Analytica. Job #4, Stockpile #1 Meets AbEC cleanup levels and is ready for review and removal. 1/17 Jeannie Fabiano Alaska TestLab Kodiak Alaska 3 Sample Collection: Sample HD Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI (02) 4 -1 1 -1 12.2 190 PQL 8.5 0.020 PQL 0.010 0.034 PQL 0,020 SPI (02) 4 -1 1 -2 11,2 SPI (02) 4 -1 1 -3 9.1 SPI (02) 4 -1 2 -1 10.0 SPI (02) 4 -1 2 -2 12.3 Yes 205 pm A0210033 -1 SPI (02) 4 -1 2 -3 10.0 SPI (02), 4 -1 3 -1 8.4 SPI (02) 4 -1 3 -2 10.3 SPI (02) 4 -1 3 -3 8.8 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, DRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from Analytica and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non - detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location DRO (100 mg/kg) GRO (50 mg/kg) RRO (2000mg/kg) SPI (02) 4 -1 -2 -2 19 PQL 4.3 ND PQL 2.2 190 PQL 8.5 0.020 PQL 0.010 0.034 PQL 0,020 Volatile Results Sample I1) Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) Xylene (69 mg/kg) SPI (02) 4 -1 -2 -2 ND PQL 0.010 ND PQL 0.010 0.020 PQL 0.010 0.034 PQL 0,020 2 Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274 -3000 Stockpile Number: Job 4,. Stkp #3 Tonnage: 500 Tons Ending Treatment Date: 10 -12 -02 Sampled By: J. Fabiano Origination of Soil: Jacobs, ADA This report outlines the findings of third party sampling as permitted by Paul Horwath, P.E. of ADEC. 5l�1 k\VAA°' Three Field Screening Samples were collected for the treated soil stockpile as directed by the Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. The samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. One analytical sample was collected from the location showing the highest PID reading. The cooler was shipped to Analytica of Anchorage Alaska (ADEC Certification UST -014). Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. The 500 -ton stockpiles will be separated into 3 individual stockpiles, which aid in sampling and will carry the same number. 1 Sample Collection: Sample PID Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI 4 -4 1 -1 1.0 45 PQL 9.1 0.017 PQL 0.011 0.023 PQL 0.022 SPI 4 -4 1 -2 0.2 SPI 4 -4 1 -3 0.2 SPI 4-4 2 -1 2.6 SPI 4 -4 2 -2 0.9 SPI 4 -4 2 -3 0.7 SPI 4 -4 3 -1 1.8 SPI 4 -4 3 -2 2.1 SPI 4 -4 3 -3 4.4 Yes 955 am A0210090 -01 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, DRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from Analytica and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non - detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location DRO (100 mg/kg) GRO (50 mg/kg) RRO (2000mg/kg) SPI (02) 4 -3 3 -3 ND PQL 4.6 ND PQL 2.4 45 PQL 9.1 0.017 PQL 0.011 0.023 PQL 0.022 Volatile Results Sample ID Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) Xylene (69 mg/kg) SPI (02) 4 -3 3 -3 0.016 PQL 0.011 ND PQL 0.011 0.017 PQL 0.011 0.023 PQL 0.022 2 Sample nomenclature: Example: SPI 15 -2 -3 SPI - for Soil Processing; 15 - for the stockpile number, 2 for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 3 - for sample location in that specific pile. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 50.0 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results from Analytica. Job 4 Stockpile #3 meets ADEC cleanup levels. Jeannie Fabiano Alaska TestLab Kodiak Alaska 3 Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274 -3000 Stockpile Number; Job 4 Stkp #4 Tonnage: 500 Tons Ending Treatment bate: 10 -14 -02 To 10 -21 -02 Sampled By: J. Fabiano Origination of Soil: Jacobs AIM, CeII 9 This report outlines the findings of third party samplingas permitted by Paul Horwath, P.E. of AbEC. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for the treated soil stockpile as directed by the Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. The samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. One analytical sample was collected from the location showing the highest PIO reading. The cooler was shipped to Analytica of Anchorage Alaska (AbEC Certification UST -014). Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. The 500 -ton stockpiles will be separated into 3 individual stockpiles, which aid in sampling and will carry the same number. Sample Collection: Sample PID Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI (02) 4 -4 1 -1 9.0 130 PQL 9.0 ND PQL 0.0086 ND PQL 0.017 SPI (02) 4-4 1 -2 11.6 Yes 1010 A0210134 -02 SPI (02) 4 -4 1 -3 10.1 SPI (02) 4 -4 2 -1 9.5 SPI (02) 4 -4 2 -2 8.7 SPI (02) 4 -4 2 -3 8.2 SPI (02) 4 -4 3 -1 7.8 SPI (02) 4-4 3 -2 7.5 SPI (02) 4-4 3 -3 7.5 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, DRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from Analytica and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non- detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location DRO (100 mg/kg) GRO (50 mg/kg) RRO (2000mg/kg) SPI (02) 4 -4 1 -2 12 PQL 4.5 ND PQL 1.9 130 PQL 9.0 ND PQL 0.0086 ND PQL 0.017 Volatile Results Sample ID Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) Xylene (69 mg/kg) SPI (02) 4 -4 1 -2 ND PQL 0.0086 ND PQL 0.0086 ND PQL 0.0086 ND PQL 0.017 2 Sample nomenclature: Example: 5P1 15 -2 -3 SPI - for Soil Processing, 15 - for the stockpile number, 2 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 3 - for sample location in that specific pile. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive. 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results from Analytica. Job 4 Stkp #.4 meets ADEC cleanup levels and is ready for review and removal. Jeannie Fabiano Alaska TestLab Kodiak Alaska 3 Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274 -3000 Stockpile Number: -Job #4 Stkp #5 Tonnage: 500 Ending Treatment bate: 10 -23 To 10 -27 Sampled By: J. Fabiano Origination of Soil: Jacob's ADA Ceti 9 This report outlines the findings of third party sampling as permitted by Paul Horwath, P.E. of AbEC. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for the treated soil stockpile as directed by the Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. The samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. One analytical sample was collected from the location showing the highest PI() reading. The cooler was shipped to Analytica of Anchorage Alaska (ADEC Certification UST -014). Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. After the first three test stockpiles. ( 50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. The 500 -ton stockpiles will be separated. into 3 individual stockpiles, which aid in sampling and will carry the same number. 1 Sample Collection: Sample PID Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI (02) 4 -5 1 -1 6.3 ND PQL 0.0081 0.010 PQL 0.0081 ND PQL 0.016 SPI (02) 4 -5 1 -2 9.1 SPI (02) 4 -5 1 -3 9.0. SPI (02) 4 -5 2 -1 8.9 SPI (02) 4 -5 2 -2 6.9 SPI (02) 4 -5 2 -3 6.8 SPI (02) 4 -5 3 -1 9.3 Yes 130 PM A0210170 -01 SPI (02) 4 -5 3 -2 8.5 SPI (02) 4 -5 3 -3 3.8 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, DRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from Analytica and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non- detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location DRO (100 mg/kg) GRO (50 mg/kg)- RRO (2000mg/kg) 110 PQL 9.0 SPI (02) 4 -5 3 -1 9.6 PQL 4.5 ND PQL 1.8 ND PQL 0.0081 0.010 PQL 0.0081 ND PQL 0.016 Volatile Results Sample ID Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) Xylene (69 mg/kg) SPI (02) 4 -5 3 -1 0.011 PQL 0.0081 ND PQL 0.0081 0.010 PQL 0.0081 ND PQL 0.016 2 Sample nomenclature: Example: SPI 15-2-3 SPI -'for Soil Processing, 15 - for the stockpile number, 2 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 3 - for sample location in that specific pile. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results from Anayytica. Job #4 Stockpile #5 meets AMC cleanup levels and is ready for review and removal at ADEC's direction. Jeannie Fabian Alaska TestLab Kodiak Alaska Post Treatment Sampling and. Analysis Report Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274 -3000 Stockpile Number: 1 Tonnage: 50 tons Ending Treatment Date: August 31, 2002 at 11:30 AM Sampled By: J. Fabiano Origination of Soil: Buskin Bepch,.Cell 10: Jacobs Sub- contract # 05.M305.28 This report outlines the findings of third party sampling as permitted by Paul Horwath =P.E. of,AbEC, rr,. y Three Field Screening .Samples were. collected for the treated soil stockpile as directed by. the; Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a. shovel' and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. The samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. One analytical sample was collected from the location showing the highest PM reading. The cooler was shipped to Analytica of Anchorage Alaska (AbEC Certification UST -014). Samples were shipped under Chain of. Custody, a copy of which is attached. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and ;00 tons:) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. The 500 -ton stockpiles. will,be..separated into 3 individual stockpiles, which aid in sampling and ;will.carry.:the same number. . 1 s Sample Collection: Sample PID Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI 1-1 16.1 ND LPQL 2.0 38 ND PQL 0.019 SPI1-2 „ , . - - ,„1.7.:7,,,,,..::::, -Vi 4.-0.-i ■',;;'4 .::-.;:,,,_;1-iy,W, ZAT;;;;,.;:, ;,'t 4 . •:•-•;- 7 i . , ,-, • , ... , .„,- : ,, SPI 1-3 18.4 yes 110 pm A0209012-01 . , Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, bRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as"BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from Analytica and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non-detect results are indicated by,Nb and arebelow the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location Dgo, ., , I ,..,, (100 mg/kg) GRO I. ,,, (50 m g) RRO . . (2000mg/kg) Xylene (69 mg/kg) SPI 1-3 35; ND LPQL 2.0 38 ND PQL 0.019 I . . , Volatile Results Sample ID Location Benzene , (0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) Xylene (69 mg/kg) SPI 1-3 0.011 ND PQL 0.0093 ND PQL 0.0093 ND PQL 0.019 Sample nonienclature: Example: SPI , SPI - foi41Sail Processing, 15 - for the stockpile number, 2 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 3 - for sample location in that specific pile. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results from Analytica. Stockpile #1 (50 Tons ) meets ADEC Cleanup Levels and may be moved. ; Jeannie Fabian Alaska TestLab Kodiak Alaska 1.) ; • , • • • 3 Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274 -3000 Stockpile Number: (02) 02 -1,2,3 Tonnage: 402.37 Ending Treatment bate: 9 -20 -02 Sampled By: J. Fabiano Origination of Soil: Loran Sta, Narrow Cape Contractor: CCI This report outlines the findings of third party sampling as permitted by Paul Horwath, P.E. of AbEC. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for each treated soil stockpile as directed by the Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. The samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. One analytical sample was collected from the location showing the highest PID reading. The cooler was shipped to Analytica of Anchorage Alaska (ADEC Certification UST -014). Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. The 500 -ton stockpiles will be separated into 3 individual stockpiles, which aid in sampling and will carry the same number. Sample Collection: Sample PID Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI 02-3-1-1 6.3 ND PQL 0.0097 ND PQL 0.0097 ND PQL 0.019 SPI 02-3-1-2 7.2 SPI 02-3-1-3 8.1 SPI 02-3-2-1 8.6 SPI 02-3-2-2 8.9 SPI 02-3-2-3 9.2 SPI 02-3-3-1 12.1 Yes 1245 A0209102-02A SPI 02-3-3-2 10.2 SPI 02-3-3-3 9.4 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, DRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from Analytica and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non-detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location DRO (100 mg/kg) GRO (50 mg/kg) RRO (2000mg/kg) 27 PQL 8.3 SPI 02-3-1 9.4 PQL 4.1 ND PQL 2.1 ND PQL 0.0097 ND PQL 0.0097 ND PQL 0.019 Volatile Results Sample ll) Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) Xylene (69 mg/kg) SPI 02-3-1 ND PQL 0.0097 ND PQL 0.0097 ND PQL 0.0097 ND PQL 0.019 2 1 Sample nomenclature: Example: SPI 0215 -2 -3 SPI - for Soil Processing, 02 - for the year, 15 - for the stockpile number, 2 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons,. 3 - for sample location in that specific pile. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the con results from Analytica. ory analytical Stockpiles 1,2 &3 of Job #02 meet AbEC Cleanup Levels. Soils are from Narrow Cape Loran Sta, provided to 5PI by CCI. Jeannie Fabiano Alaska TestLab Kodiak Alaska 3 Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274 -3000 Stockpile Number: (02) 3 -1 Tonnage: 21 Tons Ending Treatment Date: 9 -25 -02 Sampled By: J. Fabiano Origination of Soil: UAF This report outlines the findings of third party sampling as permitted by Paul Horwath, P.E. of ADEC. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for the treated soil stockpile as directed by the Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. The samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently: One analytical sample was collected from the location showing the highest PID reading. The cooler was shipped to Analytica of Anchorage Alaska (ADEC Certification UST- 014). Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. The 500 -ton stockpiles will be separated into 3 individual stockpiles, which aid in sampling and will carry the same number. Sample Collection: Sample PID Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI3 -1 -1 15.6 Yes 1145 A0209140 -01 SPI 3 -1 -2 13.6 SPI 3 -1 -3 11.6 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, DRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from Analytica and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non - detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location DRO (100 mg/kg) GRO (50 mg/kg) RRO (2000mg/kg) 20 PQL 8.4 SPI 3 -1 -1 ND PQL4.2 ND PQL 2.0 ND PQL 0.0090 ND PQL 0.0090 ND PQL 0.018 Volatile Results Sample ID Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) Xylene (69 mg/kg) SPI 3 -1 -1 ND PQL 0.0090 ND PQL 0.0090 ND PQL 0.0090 ND PQL 0.018 2 Sample nomenclature: Example: SPI15 -2 -3 SPI - for Soil Processing, 15 - for the stockpile number, 2 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 3 - for sample location in that specific pile. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. `After the first three test, stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one'analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results from Analytica. Job # 3 -1, UAF Soils meet AbEC cleanup levels and is ready for review and removal. y�ll�J�i> GG1,, /iY/GG�r7 Jeannie Fabiano Alaska TestLab Kodiak Alaska FHK NU. :9472749295 Nov. 07 2002 10 : 23PM P2 October 31, 2002 Rusty Gesin Division of Air and Water Quality State of Alaska 610 University Ave. Fairbanks, AK 99708 Subject: Soil Processing Inc. Notification Re-Testing Dear Ms. Gesin: On behalf of Soil Processing Inc., we would like to inform you that Alaska Source Testing, LLC plans to be on -site in Kodiak for a particulate source test on November 4, 2002. The particulate re- testing will be in accordance with the test plan that was submitted to the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation dated July 22, 2002. If you, or anyone else in your office, have any questions or, would like any additional information, please call at the number listed in the footer of this letter. Sincerely, Shelley Hokenson Alaska Source Testing Jennie Sharpe/George Cline, SPI FROM :SOILPRO FAX NO. :9072749295 Nov. 11 2002 04:42PM P1 SOIL PROCESSING INCORPORATED PORTABLE THERMAL UNITS • OILFIELD SERVICES • FMJIRONMENTAI_ CLEANUP Rusty Gesin State of Alaska. DEC Division of Air & Water Quality 610 University Avenue Fairbanks, AK 99709 -3643 November 11, 2002 Dear Ms. Gesin, Soil Processing Inc. (SPI) recently completed re- testing for particulate matter as required, and are pleased to inform you that the results are significantly below the limit of .05. We were able to achieve this by installing new spray nozzles of the correct size and in the proper arrangement in the air flow tubes. Further, we found that one nozzle in the heliclone (scrubber), installed since our last successful test, was in fact causing the.unit to carry over water drops. We now believe that our pond dimensions and water quality were not the cause of our failed emissions test. SPI had the water tested as requested by the ADEC Water/Wastewater Program (Mr. Oran Woolley) with results meeting water quality standards. SPI will continue to inspect all nozzles on the regular 48 hour maintenance schedule and replace them as necessary. We believe that this nozzle arrangement in conjunction with the design water flow rate of 89 gpm will ensure future compliance with particulate emissions limits. Based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, I certify that the statements and information in and attached to this document are true, accurate and complete. Sincerely, Subscribed and swom to before me 11th day of November 2002 this No"uaNUpay,,, Q�Alal aq� OTAR'. Y • • My commission expires 207 E. Northern Lights Blvd., Suite 103A • Anchorage, AK 99503 Telephone (907) 274 -3000 FAX (907) 274 -9295 FROM :SOILPRO FAX NO. :9072749295 Nov. 11 2002 04:16PM P3 SPI, Inc. Soil Remediation Unit Located in Kodiak, AK Summary Report Particulate Testing Prepared for; SPI, Inc. 207 E. Northern Lights Anchorage, AK 99503 Prepared by: Alaska Source Testing, LLC 520 W 58th, Unit A Anchorage, Alaska 99518 November 11, 2002 FROM :SOILPRO Alaska Source Testing Report Certification FAX NO. : W72749295 Nov. 11 2002 04:17PM P4 SPI, Inc. September 2002 As Project Manager, I certify that the testing was performed in accordance with approved methods and the data, calculations and results described in this report are true and accurate. W.M. Hudson Pete FROM :SOILPRO Alaska Source Testing FAX NO. :9072749295 Nov. 11 2002 04:17PM P5 SPI, Inc. September 2002 SPI, Inc Particulate Matter Summary Report Table of Contents Page Report Certification Acknowledgments Table of Contents 1, INTRODUCTION 1 2. SUMMARY OF RESULTS 1 2.1. Particulate Test Results 1 2.2. Visual Surveillance 1 3. SOURCE DESCRIPTION 2 4, SAMPLE LOCATION AND TRAVERSE METHODOLOGY 2 5, OPERATIONS AND TESTING CONDITION 2 6, TEST PROCEDURES AND APPARATUS 2 7. CALCULATIONS 8 8. QUALITY ASSURANCE 9 Appendices A. Emission Results With Example Calculations B. Field Data Sheets C. Laboratory Data D. Operational Data E. Quality Assurance Data F. Project Participants List of Tables 2.1 Summary of Particulate Test Results List of Figures Fig. 4.1 Analyzer Ports & Traverse Points Fig. 6.1 Method 5 Particulate Sampling Train 1 3 5 FROM :SOILPRO FAX NO. :9072745295 Nov. 11 2002 04:17PM P6 Alaska Source Testing SPI, Inc. September 2002 . INTRODUCTION SPI Inc., Soil Processing Incorporated, operates a soil remediation unit that is currently located in Kodiak, Alaska. To comply with conditions in general operating permit (GP-4) number AA000204, SPI Inc. engaged Alaska Source Testing, LLC (AST) to perform a source test. The testing consisted of measuring total particulate (PM) in the exhaust gases of the unit. AST performed the emission testing on November 9 -10, 2002. All procedures used during the particulate testing were conducted in accordance with USEPA Reference Methods as prescribed in 40 CFR 60, Appendix A; specifically methods 1, 2, 3A, 4, and 5. The visual opacity surveillance was performed in accordance with USEPA Method 9. Bill Hudson was project manager, on -site team leader and performed 6- minute opacity surveillance readings coinciding with each test run, Testing consisted of three, one -hour runs. This document provides a summary report of the emission testing results. 2. SUMMARY OF RESULTS 2.1,Particulate Test Results The results of sample runs are presented in Table 2 -1. Table 2 -1. Summary of Particulate Test Results Particulate Run Matter g r /scf 1 0.033 2 0,025 3 0.023 Average 0.027 Process Rate TPH `gr /scf = grains per standard cubic foot of exhaust gas 2.2. VISUAL SURVEILLANCE 12.15 12.49 11.96 12.21 Visual surveillance observations were performed in accordance with USEPA Method 9. The field data sheet is included in Appendix B. The average opacity that was observed during the three - minute periods was 0 %. 1 FROM :SOILPRO Alaska Source Testing 3. SOURCE DESCRIPTION FAX NO. :9072749295 Nov. 11 2002 04:19PM P7 SPI, Inc. September 2002 Soil Processing Inc.'s soli remedietion unit (SRU). is used for treating petroleum contaminated soils. The SRU is rated at 12 tons per hour. The SRU is equipped with a PowerCloneT"'S Model PC5 -22 wet scrubber system and a S©ILITEKTM Model 300 afterburner to control emissions. 4. SAMPLE LOCATION AND TRAVERSE METHODOLOGY The SRU has a 16 -inch stack that transitions to 24 inches. The sample ports are located at a point where the stack diameter is18.5- inches. The ports are oriented 90 degrees apart. The ports are located approximately 60 inches downstream and 22 inches upstream of the nearest disturbance. Figure 4 -1 shows the cross - sectional area of stack at the sample location. The measurements for the traverse points are provided on the figure. 8. OPERATIONS AND TESTING CONDITIONS Please refer to Appendix E for copies of the unit log sheets during the tests. Run 1 2 3 Soil Feed Rate (TPH) 12.18 /al& 1 9 ® 11.96 Particulate Control H2O Flow Rate j• allmin 2.s Pressure Drop across scrubber (in. H2O ,��/F\ If 69 y 69 ��i:& W 69 1 Water Flow Rate (gal/min) Make -u • H2O Flow Rate, rec el : H2O • al/min l • : 1, - = • 0611MA Percent of fines Tess than 200 werE Pond is 35 x 45 x 7 feet with a 10 -m 6. TEST PROCEDURES AND APPARATUS The individual test procedures used during this testing program were conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Methods as prescribed in 40 CFR 60, Appendix A. The specific methods are listed below. Method 1 Method 2 Method 3A Method 4 Method 5 Method 9 Sample and velocity traverses for stationary sources Determination of stack gas velocity and volumetric flow rate (Type S Pitot tube) Determination of oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations in emissions from stationary sources (Instrumental Analyzer Procedure) Determination of moisture content in stack gases Determination of particulate emissions from stationary sources Visual determination of the opacity of emissions from stationary sources 2 FROM :SOILPRO FAX NO. :9072749295 Nov. 11 2002 04:18PM P0 Sod Processing Inc Port Locations and Traverse Points 4 18.5 inch 60 inches 22 inches Traverse Points In Inches 1 0.39 2 1.24 3 2.18 4 3.27 5 4,63 6 6.59 7 11.91 8 13.88 9 15.23 10 16.32 11 17.26 12 18.11 Note: Points 1-2 and Points 11-12 were combined as they were within 1/2 inch of stack wail. FROM :SOILPRO Alaska Source Testing FAX NO. :9072749295 Nov. 11 2002 04:18PM P9 SPI, Inc. September 2002 The SRU ran normally and there were no shutdowns during the testing. The test equipment ran well except for the temperature controllers on the probe and filter heater. The temperatures were controlled manually. , Occasionally, and for short durations, the temperatures varied from the intended set point of 250 °F. Please refer to the data sheets where these temperatures were recorded. For this type of facility, those temperature variations would not affect sample results, The particulate testing consisted of three sample runs performed in accordance with Reference Methods 1 — 5. isokinetic variation for runs 1 -3 was 91.3 %, 93% and 99.9 %, respectively. All of these values meet Method 5 standards for isokinetic variation. Exhaust gas samples were collected using an Environmental Supply Company (ESC) Model C- 5000 Source Sampling System. A schematic of the particulate sample train is shown in Figure 6 -1, The sample system components are described below. Sample Nozzle: The sample nozzle is a buttonhook shaped tube with a tapered edge on the outside circumference of the tip. Selection of the appropriate nozzle diameter size is essential to isokinetic sampling. Sample gases must pass through the nozzle at the same velocity and conditions as present in the stack. The nozzle materials may be borosilicate glass, quartz glass, Teflon, stainless steel, or Inconnel. The nozzle for this testing program was stainless steel with a nozzle diameter of 0.314 inches for Run 1 and 0.370 inches for Runs 2 -3. Nozzle size was increased to pull more sample volume. Probe Assembly: This assembly includes the heated probe liner, a stainless steel probe sheath, stainless steel S -type Pitot tube and a K -type thermocouple sensor to monitor stack gas temperature. The probe was stainless steel. The probe liner was electrically heat traced and maintained a set point temperature of 250° F ± 25° F. A K -type thermocouple temperature is attached to the probe liner exterior surface to monitor and control probe temperature. The stainless steel probe sheath houses the probe liner. A tube fitting is welded to the front of the sheath to connect the sample nozzle. The S -type Pitot is tack welded to the exterior of the probe sheath. The K -type thermocouple sensor for stack gas temperature is attached to the Pitot tube. The tips of the Pitot tube and the thermocouple sensor are positioned to coincide with the tip of the sample nozzle. Sample Box: The sample box is the heated compartment that houses the filter assembly. The filter assembly serves to quantitatively collect particulate matter from the sample stream. A preweighed glass -fiber or quartz -fiber filter is used for particulate collection. The filter assembly is typically borosilicate glass and attaches to the probe liner with a ball/socket connection. The compartment heater is capable of maintaining a set point temperature of 250° F ± 25° F. The heating system is thermostatically controlled using a K -type thermocouple sensor. Hardware on the front of the box facilitates attachment and support of the probe assembly. A split train system was employed for SPI. The sample box connected to a 20 -foot umbilical that was then connected to the impinger train. Impinger Train and ice Bath: The impinger train and ice bath tray serves to collect and quantify sample gas moisture. The glass impinger train attaches to the filter assembly by means of a 50 -foot umbilical. The impinger train consists of 4 impingers connected by glass U -tubes with ball/socket connectors. The first 2 impingers are setup with 100 ml of 4 TEMP ETtrRTUHESENS IMPINGER TRAIN OPTIONAL, MAY EE REPLACED BY AN EQUIVALENT COI:EHSER T WERATURE SEN90R STACK WALL THERMOMETER REVERSE TYPE PITOT TUBE VACUUM LINE PITOT MANOMEI ER THERMOMETERS IMPINGERS BYPASS MAIN VACUUM VALVE VALVE fi e E ORIFICE -I DRY OAS METER ORFICE MANOMETER MR TIGHT PURTP t-kUM :SOILPRO Alaska Source Testing FAX NO. :9072749295 Nov. 11 2002 04 :19PM P11 SP!, Inc. September 2002 distilled water, The third impinger is left empty and the fourth impinger contains a silica gel desiccant to further enhance capture of sample moisture. The fourth impinger attaches to an exit connector with a K -type thermocouple to monitor the sample gas temperature. The connector attaches the sample system umbilical that consists of a sample hose, Pitot- lines, electrical -lines and thermocouple wire. The ice bath tray is simply an insulated container to hold the impinger train and the surrounding ice water Care was taken at the end of each run to drain the 20 -foot umbilical into the first impinger. Note: To facilitate leak -free operations, all sample train connections from the probe liner to filter assembly end impinger train are made with ball and socket joints equipped with either Viton or Teflon O- rings. Control Console: The control console is the heart of the sample system. Components include a rotary vane vacuum pump with valves to draw and control the flow of sample gases through the system. The sample gas passes from the sample pump through a dry gas meter (DGM) that measures the sample volume to an accuracy of 0.001 cubic feet. K -type thermocouples are located on the DGM inlet and outlet to monitor average temperature. A flow orifice is attached to the outlet of the DGM. The console is equipped with a gauge to monitor system vacuum. Two digital temperature controllers are Included to maintain probe and sample box temperatures. Double incline oil - filled manometers (0- 10" H2O) are located on the console front panel to indicate the differential pressures from the flow orifice ( ©H) and the Pitot measurement of stack gas velocity head (AP). A digital thermocouple readout is located on the panel. A small vacuum pump is included to facilitate collection of combustion gas samples for oxygen (02) and carbon dioxide (C 02). Quick- connect connectors are provided for sample and Pitot lines. Connections for the umbilical electrical line and thermocouple inputs are also provided in the front panel. Priorto beginning the particulate testing, preliminary checks were performed to ensure that the sample location was in accordance with Method 1. The number of traverse points was determined and the inside diameter of the stack measured. Preliminary measurements were collected for stack gas velocity head, temperature and moisture content. Barometric pressure at the sample location was recorded. A check for cyclonic flow was conducted and data is included in Appendix B, Field Data. Data from the preliminary stack checks were input into an isokinetic slide -rule calculator to determine the appropriate nozzle diameter. Using the preliminary test data and the actual diameter of the nozzle to be used, a K- factor was calculated to allow for appropriate flow adjustments and to maintain isokinetic sampling rates, The particulate testing consisted of three sample runs, each run consisting of 24 individual traverse paints, 12 points for each of the sample ports. Each traverse point was sampled for 2.5 minutes for a run length of 60 minutes. Prior to each sample run, the impinger train was prepared and a pre - sample . impinger weight determined with a top loading electronic balance. The data was recorded on a field data sheet. The sample train was then assembled with a pre - weighed glass -fiber filter, the probe heat and sample box heaters were engaged and the system allowed to heat up to the set point 6 FROM :SOILPRO Alaska Source Testing FAX NO. :9072749295 Nov. 112002 04:20PM P12 SPI, Inc. September 2002 temperature. A pre -run leak test was then performed with a vacuum up to 15" of mercury (Hg). Leak checks were also performed on the Pitot tube and Combustion gas sample lines. Once all of the leak tests had been successfully completed, the initial DGM reading was recorded. The stack port was opened and the sample train nozzle positioned to the first traverse point. The AP reading was recorded and - sample flow initiated and adjusted for the appropriate isokinetic sampling rate. Data were recorded for iH, sample box temperature, impinger train exit temperature, DGM inlet/outlet temperature and system vacuum. At the conclusion of sample point time the probe was immediately moved to the next point, the sample flow adjusted for iso- kinetics, and the data recorded. This procedure was repeated for each successive point along the traverse. At the conclusion of the sample run, the sample pump valve was closed and the probe was removed from the stack. The final sample volume was recorded from the DGM. A post -run leak check was performed at a vacuum equal to or greater than the highest vacuum recorded during the run. Once the system had cooled, sample recovery began by disassembling the train. The nozzle, probe assembly, and filter assembly were sealed with aluminum foil and removed to a clean location for recovery of the particulate sample. The nozzle was removed and rinsed 3 times with acetone. To assist in removing any residual particulate a small bristled brush was used during each rinse. The nozzle rinse was saved in a clean glass sample bottle. The probe was then cleaned in a similar manner using acetone and a probe brush. Three rinses were conducted. The acetone, from the probe rinse was combined with nozzle rinse. A field check was performed for the acetone rinse and filter. After the field check, the filter assembly was sealed and moved to clean area. The sample bottle containing the nozzle /probe rinse was labeled with the run identification. The acetone level was marked for a volume determination at the laboratory. Both the petri dish and the nozzle /probe rinse samples were sealed and prepared for transport to a clean area. The impinger train was disassembled and final weights determined for each impinger (to the nearest 0.5 grams). The total grams of water captured was calculated and recorded on the field data sheet. A sample of the stack gas was withdrawn through a stainless steel tube attached to the probe assembly. The sample was continuously extracted into a Tedlar bag. At the end of the run the gas was analyzed on -site using a California Instrument 02/CO2 analyzer. The analyzer was calibrated using EPA Protocol 1 gas prior to analyzing the bag sample. The instrument used for the analysis was a California Analytical Model 202.02/CO2 Analyzer. The instrument was calibrated prior to and following each of the sample runs. The instrument specifications are listed below. Oxygen Analyzer Components Principle of Operation: P �Span: 0 -5 %, 0 -10 %, 0 -25% Lineari B h Zero /Span Drift; Less than ± 1 % full Lscale in 24 hours Carbon Dioxide Components Paramagnetic Principle of Operation: NDIR Span: 0 -10 %, 0 -20% ty: Better than ± 1 % full scale Linearity: Better than ± 1 % full scale Zero /Span Drift: Less than 1 1 % full scale in 24 hours 7 FROM :SOILPRO FAX NO. :9072749295 Nov. 11 2002 04,:21PM P13 Alaska Source Testing SPI, Inc. September 2002 At the clean area, each filter sample was recovered from the glass filter assembly. Using a stainless steel spatula and forceps, the filter was removed and placed in a petri dish labeled with the filter identification number. A camelhair brush was used to remove any loose particulate from the front half of the filter assembly and brushed onto the. filter. The front half of the filter assembly and the connecting glassware was then washed and brushed with acetone and the rinse combined with nozzle /probe rinses. After log -in of the samples, the particulate filters were transferred to an oven and allowed to desiccate for approximately two hours at 250 °F. The filters were then transferred to a desiccator for two hours. The sample was then weighed with an electronic analytical balance to the nearest 0.0001 grams. The nozzle /probe rinse sample was examined for any leakage and the volume recorded. The rinse was then transferred to a preweighed 250 - milliliter glass beaker for analysis. The rinse sample was then evaporated to a dry residue on a hot plate and transferred to a laboratory oven at 105 °C for 2 hours. The rinse sample beaker was then transferred to a desiccator and allowed to equlllbrate to room temperature. The beaker was then weighed to the nearest 0.0001 grams. The total particulate value for each sample run was calculated by combining the net particulate catch from the filter sample with the net particulate' residue from the nozzle /probe rinse sample. 7, CALCULATIONS All calculations were checked by a second party. Hand calculations have been performed to verify the spreadsheet calculations. Please refer to Appendix A for a printout of the spreadsheet and for the hand calculations. The major steps and basic principles of the Method 5 equations are as follows: ♦ Correct the sample extraction volume measured by the control console dry gas meter to standard conditions; • Determine the moisture content of the stack gas from the `volume of the water collected in the impinger train and convert to an equivalent volume of water vapor in sample gas: ♦ Weight the total particulate recovered and divide the result by the corrected sample volume: • Determine the actual stack velocity based on the Pitot tube readings; • Using the cross - section area of the stack determine the volumetric flow rate of the exhaust gases in actual cubic feet per minute (acfm). Then corrected the volumetric flow rate to dry standard conditions al 68° F and 29.92 inches of Hg (dscfm); • Calculate the isokinetic comparison of the corrected sample volume and the corrected stack velocity. This comparison validates that the correct volume of sample gas was extracted at the correct sample rate. This value must be. between 90- 110% for the run to be valid. Please refer to Appendix A for a summary of the calculation results. 8 FROM :SOILPRO Alaska Source Testing 8. QUALITY ASSURANCE FAX NO. :9072749295 Nov. 11 2002 04:21PM P14 SPI, Inc. September 2002 To ensure the collection of high quality and accurate data, AST strictly adhered to all the USEPA Reference Methods including the Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems Volume ill during this testing program. In all other aspects of the -testing, AST followed its own corporate Quality Program Manual QPM-1, 10/31/97, AST incorporated several measures to ensure successful, accurate sample collection and analysis. These measures are discussed below, 1) The ESC C-5000 source sampling train and other components used by AST meet or exceed method requirements. 2) AST performed pre and post-run leak tests to ensure sample collection integrity. AST also performed pre and post-test calibrations of the ESC C-5000 dry gas meter. 3) A single laboratory blank was performed. A comparison of the tare weight to the final weight was 0.1 mg. Documentation for all quality controVquality assurance activities for the sample collection is presented in Appendix E. Quality assurance data for the gravimetric analyses of the field and laboratory blanks are presented with the laboratory data in Appendix C. 9 FROM :SOILPRO FAX NO :9072749295 Nov. 11 2002 04:22PM P15 Appendix A Emission Results With Example Calculation FROM :SOILPRO Alaska Source Testing, LLC FAX NO. :972749295 Nov. 11 2002 04:22PM P16 SPI Particulate Matter Emissions September 2002 RunNumber 1 2 DGM Volume cubTcfeet 25.431 37.493 31.567 DGM Y Factor - 099 0,99 0.99 DGM Average Temperature Degrees R 522 518 516 Barometric Pressure nche Ng 29.35 29.41 29.62 Delta H Inches Water 0.69 • 1,63 1.15 Sample Volume at Standard Conditions (Vmstd) Standard Cubic Feet 25.01 37.47 31.74 Total Volume of Water collected Milliliters 332.5 446.5 408.0 Standard Volume af Water (Vwstd) Standard Cubic Feet 15.651 21,017 19.110 Stack as Moisture Content - 0.3849 0.3593 0.3759 Pitot Tu C ' - 0.84 0.84 084 Average Rot differential pressure _ Inches Water 0.183 0.19 0.123 Square Root of Differential Pressure - _. .. 0.428 0.436 0.351 Average Stack Gas Temperature (TsAv) Degrees R 626 623 029 Measured Stack Pressure Inches Water . 0.1 0.1 0,1 Absolute Stack Pressure Inches Hg 29.36 29.42 29.63 Stack Oxygen % 8 7.2 6.8 S e k CO2 % 9.6 10 , 'Stack N2 43.8 46.8 45.1 Stack Gas Wel Molecular Weight 113/1b mole 28.0 ' 26.3 28.2 Actual Average Velocity (Vs) ft/sec 27.81 28.09 22.67 Stack Diameter . ft 1.33. 1.33 1.33 Stack StackArea sq ft 1.40 140 1.40 Standard Stack Gas Volumetric Flow - , Standard Dry Cubic Feet/min 1190.7 1261,0 989.1 Total PM Collected m■ 53.0 59.9 47.9 Particulate n entrati grlscf 0.0326 0.0246 0.0232 Particulate Emission lb/hr 0.333 0.266 0.197 Nozzle Diameter , Inches 0.314 0.370 0.371 Nozzle Area sq ft min 0.000537758 60 0.000746674 80 0.000750715 80 Sample Time Iso-kenetics ' % 91.31 93.02 09.89 FROM : SO I L.PRO FRX NO. 9072749295 SPI, Inc. Example Method 5 Calculation Run 3 Dry Gas Meter (DGM) Volume Vm DGM Y Factor: DGM Average Temperature Tm Barometric Pressure Pbar : Average Delta H dH: 31.567 cubic feet 0.99 51Q° R 29.2 " Hg 1.15" H2Q Nov. 11 2002 04:23PM P17 Sample Volume at Standard Conditions Vmatd (USEPA Method 5 Eq. 5 -1) Vmstd = K1VmY ((New + dH /13.6)/Tm) K,= 17.64 °R/ in. Hg Vm :td = 17.64 °R/ in. Hg *31.567 ft3 '0.99((29.62 in Hg + 1.15" H20/13.6)/ 516° R) Vmad = 31.735 Standard Cubic Feet Moisture Content ( USEPA Method 5) Total Water Collected in Sample Train: 406.0 mi Vwstd = K2 Vie (Eq. 5.2) Where: Vwstd = Volume of water vapor in the gas sample in standard cubic feet K2 = 0.04707 ft3/m1 Vt� total volume of liquid collect in mi at standard conditions Vwstd = 0.04707 (406 ml) Vwsto = 19.110 sft3 Bws = Vwstd/(Vmstd + Vwatd) (Eq. 5 -3) Where B - Moisture content of the sample gas expressed as a fraction El, s = 19.110/(31.735 + 19.110) 8,,,,, = 0.3758 FROM :SOILPIJ Average MW Method 3A 02 Average: Method 3A CO2 Average: 10.5% N2% = 100 — 02% - CO2% - Hz0% N2 %= 100 -6.8 -10.5- 37.58 = 45.12% FA,>{ NO. :9072749298 Nov. 11 2002 04:23 M P18 6.8% Average MW (Ms) _ (02 %/100)(32) + (CO2 %/100)(44) + (H20 %/100)(18) + (N2 %/100)(28) Average MW = (6.8/100)(32) + (10,5/100)(44) + (37.581100)(18) + (45.121100)(28) = 26.19 Velocity Calculation (40 CFR 60 App. A Method 2) Average Pitot differential pressure (Op): 0.123" H2O Average stack temperature (Ts): Measured Stack Static Pressure: 629 °R 0.1" H2O Vs = Kp'Cp *y(OP)av *4(Ts(av )IPsMs) (Eq. 2.9) Where: Vs = Velocity In Standard Feet per Sec (fps) Kp = 85,49 ft/s[(Ib /Ib mole)(in. Hg) /( °R)(in. H20)]12 Cp = Pitot tube coefficient = 0.84 (dimensionless) Op = Measured velocity head in inches of H2O T9 = Average Stack temperature in °R Ps = Absolute Stack Pressure in inches of Hg M5 = Molecular weight of the Stack gas (wet) Ps = Ambient Pressure + Stack Pressure 1 inch H2O = 0.0736 inches Hg Ps = 29.62" Hg + (0.1 "H20)(0736)in. Hg /in. H2O = 29.63" Hg Vs = 85.49(.84)( X10.123)* 4(629/(29.63`26,19)) = 22.67 fps FROM :SOILPRO FAX NO. :9072749295 Nov. 11 2002 4: 23M P19 Volumetric Calculation (Method 2) Stack Diameter: 1.33 ft Stack Area: 1.40 ft2 Qui = 60 (1-13ws)VsA(rs-rorrs ev)(PdPs"ro) (Eq. 2-10) Where: = Dry volumetric stack gas flow rate corrected to standard conditions (dscflmin) B = Volume of water vapor in stack gas (%/100) V5 = Average velocity (ft/sec) A = Stack cross sectional area (ft2) TSTD = 530° R Ps-ro = 29.92 in Hg Clsci = 60(1- 0.3758)(22.67)(1.40)(530(629)(29.63129.92)= 99'1.7 dscf/miin Particulate Concentration Total PM Collected (Mn) 47.9 mg C5 = 0.001 g/mg Mn Nmaid Cs = 0.001 (47.9)131.735 Cs = 0.00151 g/ft3 1 g/ft3= 15.43 grainsift3 Cs = 0.0233 gralns/ft3 Please Note: Small differences result from rounding. FROM :SOILPRO Isokinetic Variation Sample Time: Nozzle Diameter: Nozzle Area: FAX NO. :9072749295 Nov. 11 2002 04:24PM P20 60 minutes 0.371inches 0.000750715 ft2 I = (K4T,V,„w)/(PsVsAnT(1-Bws)) (Eq. 5-8) Where: I= Isokinetic variation K4 -=.* .0945 An = Nozzle diameter in ft2 T Sample time I = (0.0945(629°R)31.735 sft3)/(29.63" Hg (22.67 ft/sec) .000750715(60 min)(1- 0.3758) = 99.88% FROM :SOILPRO FAX NO. :9072749295 Nov. 11 2002 04:24PM P21 Appendix B Field Data Sheets FROM :SOILPRO Alaska Source Testing FAX NO. : 9072749295 Nov. 11 2002 04:24PM P22 Field Data Sheet Sheet Company: ) 0 Location: 'i Iv, Test Date: iti( t Run Number. 1 T st Pers nn I: d.,.(N-.1 Plant Ass! n : %,.„ , " rit : Equip. Type: ,:" .1 <iri %.-/ , .;.- .Carci Equ .: • Rate: MINIMMOMIN 02: VIP CO2: afrid41 - No=ie Diem. 1; .7-, 2:. 'L 3: .1;1 Stack Pres. 0111111111111111111111111 Vacuum i Pi tot aK 1Pressure• iii�w MilinallIN .ost Sample system leak check rjrinl (CFM) ost =MOW i !Special Noses and StacK OlfnenSions/ ort tooatsons !Points per traverse; tliOtal point: ot!Proce ID 4 Meter Box ID !initial Meter Reading: 1 "4 a iStart un: 4- riute/poin 2. 5 'Total Run Length ft/fiItr nu Final Meter eading: Adjustments: End Run: 4 Point mer Meter Rea Ti Reading Pitot Oeitat.H Readtn. Dryer FRI Outlet OM In DGIVI a t Vac. Filter BoxiPteoe . i. • <- * < - IMMIONINIMMIIMMINUI 1111 • s 1 z- ' .• - '!.- •, ) ,01 - ..:1 I . ..r 5- 0 r !3 , 2 1 IIMINEMEMIMENIraillnill ., . 3 ; . .1. - .- • 11.11.1111MINEMINMEIMIll 115114111MUINE - • , 4 1111111111111111111111131111116MMIEWM (.. • ..- 1 -I.,' -) _ 1‘) : Wia11111411111111141111 „----• '. • • '.. . 1111101111M1111 t l .5.„, . - - ., ! .. , . • „„: „,,_ r_ 1 , -,.• - • i SEINIIIIIIIKEIMININIZINIIIIIMIIMI 10111MIN -, -.) ? i - .1 „ - oP - \ -, ...MIIIMMININIMIMMIELONIIIIIMMINTE10111011 ANIIIIIMINNEIRMINIMIN1 1111KIIINVICIMIIMIWGIMIIIM ... -- IIIIIIMMIIIMII MILMINUal - i t•-:- ''' ..., 1 z.,-, / ''''':. - .... • :-. - 2 • - „. , 1- ri , • :/ , ,-I ) , <.„ . EINIIII 1 • , 1 :.. „ 17 , - - • : 1 c . IIIIRMIIIIMINISINISINNOINI IMELIIIIIIMINNIIIIIIMEMINEMIllall a,w) ' INIMINIIIIIIMIMINIM - .. . 4.„ • , „7, • I-I. , S1 ,'; y . ( ' /1 J i---, 6)-(7) 1 c, Imo -0 . UEIINWI .111MI .11EMIll .z,f.j 111.1111MME :,- IIIINIIIMME11111111111111MEINNI IIIIHNINVIIIIEM11111111111110111110161111 11111111111111=111111115111111311111114111111NIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMHNIIIMIIMIIIIII • --I.-7. ----1. est, v. rir- 1 : h•----r--r---- I . e IMHIIIMIIIMNIIIIPPMIMIIIMIIIIII 1111111111111111111111111112101111111111111111111111 . 11111111111111111111111111111111..'. .-IIIIINIMEI MINIMINIONIUMPRO'f'i.-4,i-z7ZIAVIIIIMION MIIIIIIIIMINIIIIIIIMA. ' - ' ____ IMINIIIUMMI r•f - :,.:. . . . . 4 FROM :SOILPRO Alaska Source Testing unit 10: Rate: 1.'11 Pit= leak Pressure: FAX NO. : 972749295 ' Field Data Sheet HIMIBM111111 Equip. Type: Fuel: Nov. 11. 20E12 4:2M. P23 Sheet Control u 7 02: No=Je Dian 1: 2:. .7-:10 Stack Pres. Sample system leak check pre (CFIVI) ost pre c),(0 ,cai Nate5 and $ Qim post n 5 ito e ve e: T otal p s: Meter Box ID nuto bi CO2: 10 K V u 1 Total Run Len Bell/filter number initial Meter Reading: Adustments: Start Ru : ,"Z:Z- End Run: Point Timer —r e ar Reading 1 t bc; Final Meter )teadin: P Delta H itot Stack Dryer DG Reactin& e e n ..) , ,/ 1 t eiNIENIUMMUIR/1111151111 sMIIIIMIIIMIIIIIIMMIIIIIIIIEEIN -, 111111211111011 4 INSIIIMMIIIIIIIIMO .z1, 1111101111115$1111MINPRI IIIIIIIIIFIWZI „- 111111111119111WIESIIIIIIMIREM ____ 1•11111111111MINEZIMILIN s4, MigallEMN IIIIIIIMMIIIIIIIIIMMIIIIMMINIUMIEMIIMINKIIIIIMMIIM=111 / 24, J gl•CD k 111101111111111MISMINUMIMPAIIIIMIIIIIINWilibl U- .- IIIMIIIIIIMIIIIIIMIIIKIIIVIIMIMINENIMM 77 ,, . i4 sammintumeimmummi ,.0 , inammai marmeammaitrammi 1111111111111111111111•111MMENIMI Ilifinwill1111111111011MMIESP11111211111111E IIMIIIIIIIMIlittE11111111111Mikiso' 27 c , IIIIMIIMEIM1111111111=24 5 111011111=1111=1111M11 IIIIMINIMIIMIMMIIIPAIIIIIMI A IMI11111135111111011111MIIIIIMIIIIIMIIIMINI- - 1111.1601111=111111MAIRMIMIN1111111M1M- 5 *.k..- , . IIMMIIILIIIIIIMIIIIMIIIMINIMOVOSIE 11111111EU S 111111M111111PMEMIIIMIIIMIIIIIII 2 111.1111114111111111NIL (., 2- 11111116011KLIIIIMINMIKVIIIMM- s ',) , I 1111M11111115MMIIIIIIMIIM .1111/411MMIIIMMIVECIIIIMUNILITHERVIWIWE MillIMMIIIMM111111111111111111111111111111•111111 , IIIIIIIIIIMUMMIIIIIIIIIIIIIV41111111111011•11111NIN 111111PMEMEMINIMMENIMMINMI miniummi =111111111111111 1111=111111.11111111111111111•MMIIIIIIIIII 1111111•11111111111111111111• ONIIINI DGM Vac. Filter OX/Prote 77,c rd) lo FP011 : SO ILPRO Alaska SCUTS Testing FAX NO. :9072749295 ' Field Data Sheet Nov. 11 2002 04:25PN P24 Sheet o . Coripar ,.--..7.. LecatIon: :). I. Te : wit- Run NumDer . : i Personnel; Plant A ietance: . J— 2'1 if -1-‘4-.•'; ' .. ,..Ini ID: Equip. Type: . Control Equip: !. e: Fuel: 02: CO2-:, . ! ' - l'T (0- M ar: i No=le diam, 1: 'Li ) 2: '' ' 3: -9.' Stack Pres..f Kt: (, V I. i ot leak MIME . ressure: • St ; Sample sytem leak check (CFM) re 0 Vacuum t? ,. ' PO st Q Vacuum perc:al Noe o and Stews DIMensionfJPOrt1=3tionS cints per traverse: totiProPe ID Initial Meter Readln : Start Run: Total points: 1 Minutes/point: Total Run Lergth Point T Timer M Meter Reading D Pi D Dryer - D DGM 1 • . V Vac. 1 , ' - l'T (0- M MEIN ' ''.: U U . lie W -, 1 4 4;* WEN - • - t.?.,,v.k t -", : :. , * ' • '' . ' 1 1.111111112 / , . ',...7.,*) *** •* . .• 1 .. ... . . I. ' .:...,,-• , m minlisimmi . imilsivi , '' 0 rl NI. ') - - 1 1111111111111ININNIEVIII b b•6 E EMI • t "Z• '7 U UNIFIAINETINIMONMININ . .:,... M MR , ., FROM : SO I LPRO ichtics Testing tilie Lk, E21b. 0'11 A i,n4hoina;, AK 9G51i1 S-14.;PC.-7 NAme • AOORE.SS FAX NO. : 9372749295 Nov. 11. 2002 04:26PM P25 srAr • • -t .47c,eye RC'! ZOLI1PMN7 • raj') . URCE 14 N ; r2OWN4p7 • • .0. 47.4111 PERATINO.,MOOE 1 PS.ATING MODE Oil ERVATION DATE START Time STOP TIM IMEIMMOIMI 36 1E110 IPRISIM111111161111111111111 111111131E 0 110101011111111 111211EIMMENIMIIMIIII EMINIENIC1111111=1111111 NEM IMEINEURIMMINIMINED EIIIMISIMIRMI111111111111111111 1111111/111A■111111111 Ell 11/1== MOP .."71.'IPT7 AB Vi GROUND Le'VEL , STOP 4JlGflTREj..AriVE 70 ,I3V S' ART 70P 9 LAPiCi.F ;Rom oasERV4R STOP .11 1:3 • !:S.W(S"ZiOrr C)/0 4•7.aRr 1Y • ..441.70P i•e.4 rip OROPOTS v0 PC.Wr ?N *NE P1 £7.4,77 „:;f7ScRittE 3.4CX,OA • i":".A.Hr R ENT: NIC STOP STOP PLUME TYPE CONTINLIOLJS FUGITIVE 0 INTERMITTENT 0. IF WATER DROPLET PLUME: A T TA C11ED CJE TA CNE PAC T 14 U 0 i• Pwqp • C whvi." 37.4R7 ETOP 7 TE,..i 'AA?" STOP STOP SXY CONDITIONS STOP WINO DIRECTION START ---- TOP WET aut,t3 ! MP. RH.,oerc :.4yCLif Stolen peak.- No,(h Arrow X Emizion Point :0:461E-Nr.7 1..4101■ 23 4 6 30 AVERAGE OPACITY FOR 0 NUM8fR OF R AOINGS ABOVE % WERE A 'G OF OPACITY REAOINGS • MINIMUM MAXIMUM ; • 1.4 if:FCZ:v10 COPY OF THESE OPACITY OBSERVATIONS TWif • • L.4 • OA TE OBSERVER'S NAME /PRINT! OBSERvER-$ sic ORGANIZ.4TION CERTIFIED BY VR1F!EO ()Art 04 TE OAT( FROM :SOILPRO FAX NO. :9072749295 Appendix C Laboratory Data Nov. 11 2002 04:27PM P26 FROM :SOILPRO FAX NO. :9072749295 Nov. it 20e2 04:27PM P27 Alaska Source Testing Method 5 Filter and Acetone Rinse Analysis Date: 11-10-2002 Client: SPI Analyst: Hudson F'Iter Analysis Acetone Wash Analysis Tot I Run # Filter # Tar Final Weight Di ference Boaker Tare Final Weight Differenoe 391 0.389 0.4332 0.0442 12 102.4882 102.497 0.0088 0.053 2 382 0.3939 0.4414 0.0475 13 112.0551 112.0675 .0124 0.05 3 394 0.3774 0.4204 0.0430 am 109.4641 109.469 0.0049 0.0479 unimaimmormommus ow—milismiummalummo 1111 libration III IN standard actual , o Inv LW. . 0 . 2999 100.0000 100.0001 111111 11111.1111 IIMIIIIIIM FROM :SOILPRO FAX NO. :9072749295 Nov. '11 2002 04:27PM. P28 F. • •w. �p -T .� ..... 11/ .... ?0o 1 •L 4- t w._- ._..... ._ .4133 , CI° � 2 S !o1,. A14, Os. 4 tZ. - _..17.J 615__ FROM :SOILPRO Project Name: Test Date: FAX NO. :9072749295 EPA Reference Method 4 Moisture Content Sample Recovery Data Sheet Nov. ii 2002 04:218PM P29 ErirMillIMMINIUMMEIN Irn sin • Br 4 Mi/M11111/011111111111121111111111 IIIIMIIIMI11111111111111111=1111111111 IIIIMI111111110111111111=111111111 Run Im.in.erl m.in.er2 n e 4 Fin a. Wt. • • 777 . 1 n I I .. Wt • Net H20 Gain Wt. g - Total 74' '/-31 ___L_-. 93;15 415. Run Irrjaisierz rneir321:22L,nn incsr2L_ Final .:-.W4 4. t2L1. .. ,.....31!5 Initial Imp. \ArtIQL_..j____L__._75 9.55 Net H20 Gain Wt. (g) 1 :ro,. ■ Run # irnpinger 1 Final imp. Wtdg) (nit lmp. Wt Net H20 Gain (g 1m in er 2 mpinger mpinger 4 Performed By: To •••■■■111.10111■17/11111111■11101M■np■1111■■ ko't 444 411=100,441111■111111■1111■1■ SPQp,y ki oz Ai22AAIGEMGt1T Qr•vaaart S iST 4 Na zzL.E be AI a Fi..o w I4EL,CI_O# 114,11-1 to LATE Scaoliae2 �4tR FLeI., ¢ 13 15 t5 .IS • Is /a /o S iS !S' w,grEd. Spy 015 fl.Oti I 1 45 410 4lcjt 9Pa,Artj '15 X L.IADE2 Box AOSAA]6&'Wrath ifs %4 FEW egrrE FPca Uerzrx G. P. IV. IS s ga-d. 'y,? SA. pi 1oc°SCN 3.1EA. 5 e S e t, /CA Tema Fc.oalY4.7-4- (4 6P, FROM :SOILPRO FF:0 SiI PrcesSinci, FAX NO. :9072749295 Nov. 11 200204:29PM P31 F: NO, ; 654-3301 NcJv. II 200? 12:34i91 tilial4;41-6,4*-0A+411,, OCAttif fftutedrop _thi_, role/ „avt___. 9.65-t4/ VIKA 6-7r/ n FROM :SOILPRO FPOM : Szil Processing 117 ic,-.1,1% .44 FAX NO. : 9072749295 FAX 40. : 654-3301 Nov. 11 2002 04:29PM P32 Nov. 11 2002 12:04PM P2 3-/ -yr • I• .4% NMI. a.•■■••••• FROM :solLPRn FAX .NO. L9R7?49.225 Nov. 11 20E12 04: 30P M P33 CHI 0000074 oFs 000000, co eff„,.5r,...- PIO CHT 000008X I OF5 00000MC - 1)411.N '0 CMT 000012.n , / tri OFE foroemo C 000010,6F: rvI 1 OF; 000000.00 CHT 000012.49 OFS 000000A:10 00CC07.42 4070 OFS 000000-00 GNT 000012,72. •3D OFS 000000. CT O000102 OF flociffvrj. '1 1'i° fo ott rce/-464- ,411e0011firl. CUT 000'1S.Ir OT 000600.o0 CNT 000009 ?7, rks 110000 9•:qc to-.(no FFOh1 :9OILPRO FAX NO :9072749295 Nov. .11 2002 04:30PM P34 Appendix E Quality Assurance Data FROM :SOILPRO J FAX NO. :9072749295 Nov. 11 2002 04:3OPM P35 CALIBRATION 17ATA Si -IeLT 2 Typo -5 Pltat Tube. InSpoctiorr D.pretrindIanng lev°t ponitl °n ter • d.t.rmining a, 40d �. Dspr.. Miming level position k r dIterndnlnp (3t Mq r1. Oslo.* IMl•.tln? bvol position lot determ wane 1 A 7 I Din. IndkatMQ level position for d.t.mininel then *Coulee Z. AJ C Check Completeness L' Legibility Certification I certI'y that the Typo S pilot tube /probe It # criteria and /or applicable design featur -s and ,I Certified by: 9130/94: CD2• t Level and Perpendicular? Obstruction?' A 7:) Damaged?' 1\1 .3. ct 1.10 °s:al s +109) —I° ax. (710° s oZ s +10°)• () J By (.5° s 815 +5 °) 4 ( -,) -- (.5° 5 62 S +S•) v r (L) ., , e v -00 iwA tan y(50.125'1 V Cam) w = A tan f9 (S. 0.03125`1 S; t;;ti ID, (3/16 - S Ct S 3/8'1 j% ;; A 1(1 i-5 A /2Dt (1.05 s PA/D, s1.5) itv I ~' 35 20, 51 • Accuracy : • Specifications L.." Reasonablenessi - -- N`� ~ 4 j marts or exceeds all specIfft alions, reby assigned a pitut tube calibration factor Cp -ol 0.84. ereonnel (Signature/Date) Team Leader (Signature/Date) .. • L�� METHOD 5 DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION USING CRITICAL ORIFICES Select 1hn a Grilir:al orifices do celil +r ale the dry gas meier s.luell bracket the expected Gre -a1 :53 range. Zi Record barometric pressure Were and af!er calibafion procedure. $ Run al leaded vacuums (from Or,ti,de Calibration Ropon),'or a period ai ti me neaeasery to achieve e minhnerr, tale i vol:,mo e] 5 cubic (eel. 4) Retc:6 readknl]s in outlined be beiari other columns are eulomadically ;aleulalea. DATE: 6124.02 METER PART METER SERIAL 4: CR ITICAL ORIT ICE SET SERIAL 8: ACTOR TESTED VACUUM f- ORIFICE 9 RUNG: ]AVG) I in 1191 16 19 EADING , (FT'] mk1T1AL 1 FINAL s NET 1V,1 BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (in H INITIAL TEMPERATURES °F Ah1fj9NTl DMA INLET I Dell OUTLET 'INITIAL FINAL INITIAL FINAL D69.1 'AVG FINAL ELAPSED TIME RAIN) 6 r, .. ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPLY COMPANY AVG (P„r( .985 Gn I4O IF Y VARIATION EXCEEDS 2.60 %, ORIFICE 6I40UL10 BE RECALl5tATED V„ (STD] ISTDI (3) Y 7APoI710R51C) 970.219 914.725 994226 990.202 990.202 995.670 995576 1,902.251 1,002150 1,900.99) 1002.250 1,408.807 4.024.279 1,032557 i024.270 1432557 14)32,567 1.040,040 6.430 5.474 5.474 6.574 6.637 6.937 8.297 11.297 8.283 6:,6 69 63 59 61 6:,B 63 64 61 63 622 61 64 63 65 6:.7 ' MI 58 Ell 66 61.7 68 USING THEtR81CAL OPAFCCES AS CAU835AT10N STANDARDS: 71b S vng e8 ai se me used to radiate lhe tlanrierO weLmesal air passed tragh IheOGM. V,, ;(slay, m1 treater; °rive, V, (eldl, and the 0CM co/bretianfairr, Y Ties. 'gimbals ere aerm0.c4cebr`eYW in the spreadslxt above (1) SIN Old; n 1{r V,,, PR, +1!114!13.6 T,,, 60.75 63 5435 66.3 60.0 68,5 72.75 1000 72.75 19.09 774 10,00 12 1.7 1.7 2.4 22 2.1 AVERAGE DRY GAS M = Net volume of gas sample passed through 013M, corroded losla-rdard eorKetions K, = 17.54 `f!r1n. He (Ephshl, 0365910nm I'.g (Mom) 1.. = Absolute DOM aey I e oTahre (°R - En-jlish. °K . Menc) P l) [2) L' °, {std)= K' T, a = Volume of gas sample passed though Ihet:dicel orifice, corrected to standard conditions Ottrzh0e ambient teanreredure (`R - Er:glsb. K • Metric) M - Aweay'e 6' factor train Calcel Orifice C•ilralion (3( Y = V„ {std} = 1.1t1AcaI4xation factor V,,, {std) 6.5427 13445 1.0043 2.2434 5.5391 14538 0.9841 2.2994 5.5206 54536 0.9879 2.2664 AVG a 0.9909 4.36 8.+969 4,6313 0.8972 22419. 6.6541 9,5313 0,9916 2.2416 9 .6541 6.6313 0.8315 22416 AVG a 0.5834 -1.12 8.2643 63355 'UMW 22947 82643 9.3368 1,0087 23.642 92417 8.3366 1.0106 22667 AV0 a 1.0453 148 TI4N FACTOR. Y = AVERAGE AHE = 22592 df{R= j 0.758 ( V „(ak1) Cnirnif OUdlIOS: NO8J WdT200 ago?. TT '0^03N FROM :SOILPRO ,• : P i:ept ..r` ,L2S- Toe �: • LA..tc._:.• FAX NO. :9072749295 j \)QAE Nov. ii 2002 04:31PM P37 • - t n.G. •• 1- • FROM :SOILPRO FAX NO. : 9072749295 2.1 CONTROL CONSOLE Periodic inspection of the C-5000 Source Sampler console components is essential to maintain proper operation of the system. Regular maintenance will insure a long system lifetime. Maintenance Access The C-5000 console components am designed to be easily accessible by removal of only the rear panel for periodic inspections and maintenance. Having the plumbing and electical panels mounted independently will be much appreciated. The front and rear covers can be removed by releasing the eight cover latches (four on each). It is seldom necessary to remove the casing wrap, however, if this becomes necessary, first unscrew the eie)rr electrical and plumbing panel scouring screws located on the sides and top of the casing wrap. Second, the verriinrirz ftut wires must be disconnected at the terininal plug located on the side of the fan housing Finally, unscrew the 6 base securing screw and remove the casing wrap by lifting straight up with care not tti disturb the remaining assembly. To maintain stability of the console plumbing and electrical panel assemblies the screws securing these panels to the base should remain in place. Alternatively, the plumbing and electrical panel assemblies may be individually named for specie mairunuauce procedures by unscrewing the top, side and base panel securing screws. For ease of removal, =screw the 3 casing wrap-to-base securing screws on the side corresponding to time electrical or plumbing panel that is being removed. Pull the lower edge of the casing wrap slightly away from the base to release the panel from behind the curled edge of the casing wrap and maneuver the panel carefully towards the front oft(' unit Check the general condition of all components and rnake necessary repairs. The oil level in the wall oiler bottle must be maintained to preveat damage to the vacuum pump. 2.1.2 Pump A Gast fiber vane vacuum pump draws the stack gases through the sample train, This rotary pump is a precision instrummt with .002 clearance arthe top and .0025"—,00351' total at the ends of the rotor. The vanes self-adjust with wear and should last 5,000-15,000 hours depending:upon operating conditions h is designed for pumping dry air and should be protected against dirt and excessive moisture, With proper treatment and regular lubrication this pump requires little &Whit:nal maintenance to insure a long working life. Regular Pump Maintenenee Mae is a small hole in the top of the rear panel for regular.inspection of the knockout jar, This jar should be =pried when accumulated oil interferes with the normal flow of air to the dry gas meter. Frequent removal and elm* el Cu oiler jiu iptiuirctl 1iezi time oil level is low or the 01115 dirty. An inspection port and =lovable pane] are located on the right rear side of the unit. Unscrew the oiler jar and fill with clean oil as Nov. 11 2002 g4: 3M. P36 MAINTENANiJ 2 FR 1 : SO I LPRO FAX N0. :9072749295 Nov. 11 2002 04:33PM P39 1 1 California Analytical In5tr*ument . Inc. FFOM :SOILPRO FA.); NO. : 9072749295 Nov. t 1. 20E12 04:33PM P40 SPECIFICATIONS 14101,0DISpIERSWE eaFRAREI, OMR) ot-i hL , "j.:' .,* • • '-.. • •MibrotIOAt;'':':C;4,'. '.'?:••• - '..:f:•77' a - inadnate;J:•: ... . :.' •:?G:" '''''•': ..Gaivini&FLietteli:-. SAMPL ONTACT MATERIAL Stalns steel and Tygonr disposable gold plated cell liner. Window material CaF, Platinum, Glass, Stainless Stet, Viton and Tygonr Stainless Steal and Tygonr RANGES --- LINEARITY • See Table..Page 3 :• • Better than 17/0 Full Sowe 1Seelable. Page 3 — Ses_Tiable„Page a Bet ter than 1 Full Scale Better then 1% Full Scale iREPEATABILirf . ' - ..' - Battertt-,an 1... : .. : Full Scala :::*.-T • *•:. ' :: •Better.than.1%. .. ' ', •• iFull!:Scale,-::. • - . '-': Better than.1%. Full.Scale ... RESPONSE TIME 90% of Fa Scle In less tnari 1 second" 90% of Full Scale In 2 seconds 90% of Full Scale in 5 seconds ;SAARI FLOW RATE ... .5 to 2 liters/minute, • • l'ider/minute 1..liter/mInute, J NOISE L6151 than r./. Full Scale LOEE than 1% Fiji Eoaic Leso-than 1% ruii cesie , ;ZERO & SPAN DRIFT ! • ' * :ZERO '14 SPAN, ADJUSTMENT LeSS.trairm•% of Full,Scate......., in,24•-hours:' 1.....'. '*...,1" :Lesa,than: -1?/:c, or Full,Seale, .irrattYhoura;t::;w:." -'..- * ----! :Less, than.1%,of: Full i Scale.ln 24:1-,ours Ten turn poterrtiometer Ten turn potentiometer f —1 ; OISFLAY • I ndividua1474,digiL,:::::...-v :, :,':,•,:.: panel rret611171,,:', .,.:'' ."•.?•:•:',-* :33Migi, panel:meter.. ,. :,' =i::i.:t i;t:'.":-ii:,.::?:a !!‘"7.-*-:!- :, :3%. digitpanshmeter...:: : I : !! . .: • '',.'''..-- • . OUTI,IJ I'S S1eCt U-10VI_Jt..; or 4-20 or 0-20rnA (RS-232 optional) • 01-. 0-10V 1)C and Select, 0-1OVDC an 4-20 or 0-20mA 4-20 or 0-20mA (RS-232 optional) (RS-232 optional) l ALARMS (optimal) . - • : . . • 2 each,: ..4:3-.....:, :,,: ':.,. • ':‘. 7 Form.010A:SPDT .. : '- and ::": st:,...:: ' :!..2: Form.:A•-5A SRST . `'...': -..: . :: .., (Dry RelarContacts) : .SIngl or.Dual:::, , • .-; . Singlaor Dual:. - iSPDT:SA.'',. .*"..: ,.f.",:,' . .::5PD1=5A. *r: .: ... • :(04Relay,Contacts) ;-, (Dry Relay'gon.tacts) ' ' ,-1''''''' •• ". •1,,:.:.,..• - - ', ' • .. • ' :•," .. • AMEENT TEMPERATURE -5 to 4-6°C - tc tt145 °C -5 to 45T :SAMPLE TEMPERATURE , 0 To 50°C . , 0 to 50°C 0.to 50°C -, 1SAMPLE CONDITION -lean, nan-conciensing gas CI an, non-condensing gas Clean, non-condens:ng as !F171:1111S 1/4' tubu 1/4tuOe 1/4" tube I Fl3WER REQUIREMENTS , Hz, 70 watts/channel 1240 VAC, 50/50 115/220/240 VAC, 50/50 Hz, 70 watts/chanrvi H. 70 wattsAtln* MENSIONS 514"H x 19"W x 23-0 133mm x 483mm x SO6mrn 61/4"H x 1 9"W x 15"C) 5141-4x19"W x 15"D 133mm x 483mm x38,1mrn 133mm x 483mm x 351mr, lRELATIV5 HUMIO1TY Le.q. than 90% R.K.'" Lss than 90% R.I-1." Less than 90% P.vEIGRT (viva unit) 24 bs.. (approximate) j10.8 KR . • 15 lbs. (approximate) 10 lbs.•(approximate) 6-P Kg 4.8 Kg •CePen0.09 011 tali length and flow rate N -con de n in SPOOk,1,411‘ Jat• LUC, MN IP crimp .11710. rcnica ifesnriim• AriaIytkA Irmitmurrvervt 1238 West Grove Avenue, Orange, California 92865-4134 Telephone: (714) 974-5560 Fax: (714) 921-2531 Web site: www,gasanalyzers.com 1 ZWII:2;1111 iiISLYCK11 413 MI.171011=, inc. rrigw} 0 (named fraaemv. tenon Panomino Plum caimgoan V4•05361. FROM :SOILPRO AIR LIQUIDE� LL7 FAX NO. :9072749295 Nov. 11 2002 04:34PM P41 CERTIFICATE of ANALYSIS Interference (tree Muld -Cam orient EPA Prt?tocot Gt1ee o JRia,l:��l 'rata: i....<. • t Gyt. Number: Gy1 Pressure. 411RHntNumber; AL !u"2 -1900psIg 8249451 I r ceu nm: . Etnplratian dal!... Iwar Numoer. - 104/'12/01 04!11104 Cueeicmer: P.O. Number: Ohm: A K ao9toe Testing 1_AJKture iy valid only to n NPi U 13.0 10.2 % 4 % 4.00 *0,07 % N noe J3Atatxe • : Anelyt aal t :n a minty and N.ST traceerr:hly are in curntAfance with EPA - 500=-97(123 GM IS40 6MIS40 1803 % 0.25 CO2 N2 CC3259 09/01:01 N.A. ........... - -- --- GNII574- -----i0.08 - - - - -- 76 - --- -• - -- 0.14 .• —02 N2 38325 /51/01 'Manutncturcr: KVBiAnale Made) Plumbs': EW3024 Stu'i &1 Number; 3024 Pstah / /inn) Prirts';piec FTIR CPC CBIIbrat d 03,'.28/01 Menufar.wier: Medal Number: Serial Number: Analytical Principle: MPC Calibrated: t3�Vttmar 4805C 1101 Peramap, 03!23 01 anufrwturer: *del Number; Serial Number: ndytioal Principle: hMPC Celibretedi Anetyet: Air Liquide America curpordtian 11426 Fairmont Parkway, La Porte, Texas 77571.6000 Phone; (251) 474.8400 Fax: (281) 474.8419 FROM :SOILPRO FAX NO. :9072749295 Nov. 11 2002 04:35PM. P42 Appendix F Project Participants FROM :SOILPRO FA›< NO. :9072749295 Nov. 11 2002 04:3GPM P44 Appendix G Project Correspondence FROM :SOILPRO Alaska Source Testing FAX NO. :9272749295 Nov. 11 2002 O4:35PM P43 ject Panic an B1H Hudson Geor. e Cline re Steinar Matt Wllkenson SPI November 2002 Role Project Manager (Alaska Source Testin SPI, Inc. SPI, Inc. ADEC Observer Technical Writer Shelley Hokenson FROM :SOILPRO A fwrnlrarrnertel Laboralorbr FAX NO. :9072749295 Nov. 11. 2092 04:47PM P12 Antalytioa Alaska Southeast 5438 Shame Drive Juneau, AK 98801 (90?) 7804898 Fax (907) 780430370 11/6/2002 Soil Processing Inc. 207 E. Northern Lights, Suite 103A Anchorage, AK 99503 Attn: George Cline Lab Sample Number 30211014 -01 Semple Idenffwcadan Cent Description Well Water Work Order k; 30211014 Mao; 11/64002 Wolk ID: Balls Flats water tasting Mac Raccivcd: 11/5/2002 Lab Sample Number Client Deaaiption Enclosed are the analytical results for the submitted semple(s). Please review the CASE NARRATIVE for a discussion of any data and/or quality control issues. Listings of data qualifiers, analytical codas, key dates, and QC relationships are provided et the and of the report Sincerely, • r� L) r .J David Wetzel Project Manager "The Science of Analysis, The Art of Semite" FROM :SOILPRO FAX NO. :9072749295 Nov. 11 2002 04:55PM P1 Case Narrative Aaa(yticaAfrata Southeast Work Order; J0311013 Samples were prepared and analyzed according to EPA or equivalent methods outlined ip the • following references: **Methods fox Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, VSEPA 600/4 - 79-020, March 1983. "Methods for the Determination of Metals in Environmental Samples, EPA /600/.R- 94/111, May, 3894. * +Methods'foi4Chemical Analysis of Water and•Wastes, USW %A 600%4 -79 -020, March 1983: REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ANALYTICA QA PLAN,: A summary of our review is shown below, organized by test: SAMPLE RECEIPT: There were 1 samples received on 11/5/2002. Samples were received at a temperature of 2.1 deg C.in cooler 1 at Ana1ytica- Juneau. The cooler was opened on 11/5/2002. Comments: filtered sample upon arrival samples were received'in good condition and in order per train of custody Teat Method: 100.1 - Turbidity, Nephelometric - (Turbidity) - surface Water All method specifications were met for this test. Samples were run after the holding time had expired at the request of ADEC. Test Method: 200.8 - Metals by ICP /MS - ICPMS Diss - Surface Water All method specifications were met for this test. Teat Method: 245.1 - Mercury by CVAA - Dissolved - Surface Water All method specifications were met for this test. FROM :SOILPRO Detailed An (SDG): Projects Clear Chart Project ?slumber: Report Section: Client Sample Name: FAX NO :9072749295 ral Report J0211014 Bdls Flats waltz' testing Boil Processing Inc. 3 Client Sample Report [Well Water Nov. 11 2002 04:56PM P3 11/4/2002 1:35:00PM Lab Saanyic Number: Prep Data: Analytical Melhud ID: Prcp Method ID: Prop Batch Number: Report Reis: Sample ltCy wt./vol: Mammy J0211014-01A 11/5/2002 245.E - Mcreury by CVAA - Dissolved 245.1 1021106007 As Rewind 20.00 ml CASN• 7439-97-6 Lab Semple Number. Prep Data: Analytical Method ID: Prop Method ID: Prep Batch Number: Report Beim Sample Plep wtJval: /11311th Amtmony Ammo Barium Beryllium Cadmium t7t*emium Lsieltd Seleaitnl lhssiun 10211014-01A 11/5/2002 200.8 - Metals by ICP/MS - ICPMS Dim 3005 ICP J021105004 As Received 50.00 ell 7440-36-0 744431.2 1440-34 -3 7440.41 -7 7440-43-9 7440.47 -3 7444022 -0 7764 -44.2 7440.28.0 Analysis Date: Instrument: File Name: Dilution Factor: Analyst Initials: Prep Extract Vol: 11/5/2002 1:40:41PM CVAA .1 CT 20.00 1• 1 18.204 ND 22.7 ND ND 0.300 3.30 fta Ult uL uL ug/L ug/L n giL u gIL 112/1. rat 1►�at. 0.10 a027 0.15 4044 0.25 0.082 0.15 0.045 0.20 0.062 0.15 0.044 Q 15 13050. 0.50 0.14 0.050 0.017 Analysis Date: 11/5/2002 2:35:44PM lass m<ent Elan File Name: export110502.0 Dilution Factor. 1 Analyst Initials: SAW Prep Extract Vol: 50.00 1111 Lab Sample Number. Prep Date: Analytical Method ID: ?'rep Method ID: Prop Batch Number. Report Basic; Sample prep wtJval.- tlr�ta Tnibidity J021101401B 11/6/2002 180.1 - Turbidity. Nepbelametric - (Turbidity) 1110.1 J021106006 An Received 1.00 mi KAM Base rime Unite 1.11 Nf1T Analysis Date: Instrument: File Name: Dilution Factor Analyst !nests: Prop Extract Vol: zsg, sent. 0.10 0,10 11/6/2002 10:30:00AM Turbidomcter DV/ 1.00 ml Page 3 of Detailed Analytical Report Workarder (SDG): Project: Clime Client Project Number: Report Section: (.11dti Sample Name: M.ttjx: l.ab Sampk Number ?rep Date: Analytical Method ID: Prep Method ID: Prep Basch Number: Report Basis: Sample prep wt:/vol: tummy J0211014 Bells Flab water testing Soil Prooaeeitag Inc. 3 Method Blank Report Analylica Alaska Southeast Aqueous J021106007 -MB 11/5/2002 245.1 - Mercury by CV A A - Disaolvcd 245.1 J021106007 Dty Weight Batts 2000 mI Sualia Bing 7439.97.6 NO Collection Date: Analysis Date: File Name: Dilution Factor: am tide Da /DI ug/L 0.20 0.051 Lab Sarapk Number. Prep DIM; Analytical Method ID: Prep Method ID: Pop Batch Number. Report Basis: ' Sample prep at./vol: Antimony music Fiarin. Beryllium Cadmium Ctn cn i Micky! Sstimium ThaDi,un 3021105004-MB 11/5/2(X12 200.$ - Metals by ICY/MS - ICPMS Dins 3005 JCP J021105004 Dry Weight Basis 50.00 sni 7440.36-0 744041 -2. 7440 -39-3 7440.41 -7 7440-43 -9 7440-47 -3 744042.0 7714 -d42. 744024.0 Remit ND NI) NA ND Ni) Nn ND NI) ND Ewa ua to twit uL ug/L ug/L ug/1, WO, u /I. 0.10 0.027 0.1S 0.25 0.15 0.20 0.15 0.15 0.30 0.050 0.044 0002 0.045 0.062 0.049 0.050 0.14 0.017 1 1/5/2002 12:00:00AM 13/5/2002 1:40:41 PM CVAA_1 Analyst Initials: CT Prep Extract Vol: 20.00 ml Analysis Date: Iastlumcat File Name: Dilution Factor Rana N: 1 11/5/2002 2:15:OSPM Elan e:gxirt110502.c Analyst initials: SAW Prep Extract Vol: 50.00 ml boon Page 4 of 8 FROM :SOILPRO FAX NO. :9072749295 NOV. 11 2062 04 :57PM P5 Detailed Analytical Report Analytica Alaska 5outhtsws1 Workorder (SDG) 30211014 Project: Bell Flab water testiag Cam* Soil Processing Inc. Client Project Number: 3 Recovery Report work Ordn.: 30211014 Prep Batch Number: J021105004 Sian Saropk QC Sample QC Duplicate: >: . Malyto J0211014 -OIA 30211014.01A -DUP 11/5/2002 2:35:44PM 11/5/1002 239;47PM R P Duo Ra Anal. Method: Sample Prep Date; Analysis Uruu: Matrix: QC wretQ'ptaAolris pat 0.202 0.195 200.8 • Metals by ICP/MS - ICPMS Dias 11/5/2002 12:00:00AM Aqucous 1113/'1002 2:39 :47PM DUPRPr) DUPUCa. 3.6 0.310 0.413 3.30 ND 3.27 ND 20 20 20 0 0.0 20 0 0.0 20 -6.4 20 2.1 20 0 0.0 20 6 0.0 20, DUPFI Nora 3 NOW 3 Bo.e Seraph) QC Sample QC Duplicate: forplarabli, Ulm ge WOG A'aly'dr Dam' Anolyta X/211050•4413 .10211odoa4 -LCS J0Z11013004 -LCSD 114/2002 2:15:0IPM 11/3 /2002 2:19:091314 s' 1'P.. Spiky 3p Dup Spill Coat Flown R. Ra Anal. Method: Sample Prop Date: Analysis Units: Matrix: QCDQP9•'p*AWyEa Doc 200.8 - Metals by ICPMS - ICPMS Dies 11/5/2002 12:00:00AM tggl- Aqueous 1113/2002 2:23:39PM Roam Spi ellup SPDt7P.R LCL UCI. RPD RPD FI Roc Fl Caec EC Attimcity Anemic ND 49.5 50.5 50.0 99.0 50.0 101.0 20 120 2.00 Waal Soloa+an Pace 5 of 8 020 NI) 313 52.7 50.0 102.6 50.0 105.4 80 125) 2.69 ND 533 53.0 30.0 106.6 30.0 106.0 80 120 0.56 FROM :SOILPRO FAX NO. : 9072749295 Nov. 11. 2002 04: SOPM P6 Detailed Analytical Report Workorder (81)0): 30211014 Project: BNIt Flab water testing Client: Soil Processlag inc. Client project Number: 3 Prep Batch Number: 30211011004 Base sample QC Sample QC l !late: SngieMaYist : QC 5aagi. tidy:s DsU: 11�elkwn J0211O$104 -LCS J021185e04 -LCSD 11/512002 2:15:08PM 1115/20x2 219:09PM Stop Spoke Sp Dap Rol Rest Rea 59.4 Analytic* Alaska Southeast QC Recovery Report Work Onder, 90211014 Aaa1. 200.8 - Motels by ICP/MS - Sample Prop Date: 11/5/2002 12 :00:OOAM Analysis Unitt>: Mork Aqueous twP5•o710 n11e 11/7/2002 2:23:39PM spUre Recov Spdc.Dap 511R/P.R LCl, 11CL RPD RFD Fl Cost Com EC 52.1 50.0 106.8 10.0 104.2 246 Roo 19 Prep !Web Number: Base 8atnpla QC Sample 1106007 3aapruadyos Asir QC Sallie Andras Daly 11/5/2002 1:40:41PM 11/32002 1:40:41PM Anallte Sip. Spik, Result R. Anal_ Method Sample Prep Date: Analysis Units: Matrix: Q'eetIPSeerte Asses s Remo Base Sample J021106007 -M QC Sample J1/21106007.LC8 &Moll"" nese: 1115/2002 1:40:41 PM QC Smoak Aaslyas Mir 11/5/2002 k40 :41PM Mulybis mop Sp Rands R Space Caoe 3.75 Anal.. Method: Semple Prep Dom: Analysis Units: Matrix: QC elms Mulym Remy 245.1 Mercury by CVAA - Dissolved 11/5/2002 12:00;00AM ug Aqueous LCL UCL 245.1 - Memory by CVAA - Dissolved 11 /512002 12:00:00AM WA- Aqueous . Let, [JCL 85 115 Rea P1 Rea Fl FOOTNOTES TO QC REPORT Note 1: Retests are shown to throe si6nificant figurea to amid rearehmg ertoltr in calculations Page 6 ail FROM :SOILPRO Detailed Analytical Report 30211014 Bells Flat; water testing Boll Processing Inc. Workorder (SDO): Project: Client FAX NO. :9072749295 Nov. 11. 2002 04:50PM P7 Analytiea Alaska Southeast sleet Proje d Number: 3 Not 2: If the sample 4471mentrntien is greater then 4 times the rfikc level, a recovery is not calculated, and the result should be used u a replicate. In such cases the spike is not an high as expected random meastrement varlabllity of the sample result itself. Note 3: For sample duplicates, if the result is Iesa than the PQL, the duplicate 11PD is not applicable and is shown as 0, lithe ssanple and duplicate results are not Eve times the PQL or grt:atOr, then the RPD is not expected to fall within the window shown and the comparison should be muds on the basis of the absolute difference. Analytica uses the criterion that the absolute diffesenee should be less than the PQI. for water ur less than 2XFQL for ether matrices. QC BATCH ASSOCIATIONS - BY METHOD BLANK Lab Project IDs 13,329 Lab Project Number: Lab Method Blank Id: Prep B ID: Method: .10211014 3021105004 -MB 1021105004 200.8 - Metals by 1CP/MS - ICPMS Diss Prop Data: 11/5/2002 This Method blank and sample preparation batch are associated with the following samples, spikes, and duplicates; 30211013-01A 302110I4-01A J021105004-LCS 1021105004-LCSD 10211014- 01A -DUP 10211013.01A -MS Qieatt iemnlaName Batch QC Well Water ICS LCSD DUP MS Dat*l"de 11/5/2002 2:43 :48PM 11/5/2002 2:35:44PM 11/5/2002 2:19:09PM 11/5/2002 2 :23:39PM 11/5/2002 2 :39 ;47PM 11/5/2002 287 :47PM cxport110502.csv exporl110502.esv expott110502.csv e xportl 10502.cav export110502.csv exports 10502.osv tab Method Bleak Id: Prep Bauch ID: Method: This Method blank and SataaleNnm Clieul§wavlesNeme 30211013-01A Batch QC 10211014-01A Well Water 1021106007 -LCS LCS 10211013.0IA - -DUI' DIJP 10211014-01A-MS MS Prep Date: 11/5/2002 3021106007 -MB 1021106007 245.1 - Mercury by CVAA - Dissolved sample preparation batch are associated with the following samples, spikes, and duplicates: Pile ysisDate 11/5/2002 1:40:41PM 11/5/2002 1:40:41PM 11/5/2002 1:40:41PM 1115/2002 1:40:41PM 11/5/2002 1:40 ;41PM Page 7 of 8 FROM : SOILPRO Detailed Analytical Report J0.211014 Bells nab welter testing Boni Processing Ins" 3 Workarder (SDG): Projects [:Gate: Client Project Number: FAX NO. : 9072749295 Nov. 11 2002 04:59PM P8 Auelytica Alaska Southeast DATA SLAGS AND DEFINITIONS The PQL is the Method Quentit tion Limit ens defined by MACE. Reporting Limit Limit it below which results we s•wn an "ND ". This may be the PQL MDL, era value between. See the report conventions below. Result Field ND Not Detected at or above the Reporting Limit NA =Analyte not applicable (sec Cane Narrative for discussion) Qualifier Fields: LOW - Recovery is below Lower Control Limit HIGH - Recovery , RPD, or other parameter is above Upper Control Limit E z Reported concentndioo is above the utabtunent calibration upper range Organic Analysis)Flaga: S Anaiyto was detected in the laboratory method blank J Analyte was detected abnva 1 )L or R.p4rting Limit but below the Quern Limit (SQL) Analysis 1 legs: J - Anal * was detected above the Reporting Limit but below the Quant Limit (PQL) W = Post digestion spike did not moot criteria S = Reported value determined by the Method of Standard Additions ()ASA) Other Raga may be applied. See Cann Narrative for Description TT?stPksiNanie 180.1 1180.1 (Aqueous) - (Turbidity) 200.81200.8 (Aqueous) - TCPMS Dies 245.11245.1 (Aqueous) - Dissolved 300.W300.0 (Aqueous) - Amami 333.2/335.2 (Aqueous) - Total CN Page 8 of i3 REPORTING CONVENTIONS FOR THIS REPORT Bads As Received As Received As Received As Received As Received N Sin Pies 2 3 3 3 2 $kQang Unlit Report to PQL Report to PQL Report to PQL Repots to PQL Report to PQL 0 Z N d cc ti FROM : SO I LPR0 ANALYTICA G R O U P 811 W. 8th Ave. Anchorage, AK 9901 (907) 258 -2106 FAX: (907) 2531634 5438 Shaun Ori s Juneau. AK 99801 (807)7808868 FAX: (607)7804670 12108 Pennsylvania Street Thornton, CO 80241 (303) 4804866 FAX; (303), 4694254 WNW' ewtayticaOro t .00m Chain of Custody Record 1 Analysis Request 0 ' PanCy N Pn1ect Hams: •..J ,/ arm a) v c.1.• • flLL- fLorq 4 (,t) (Prior Authoritaf on nequirod) RELb�VQUISNEO BY 5414'Le4: :" t:iVED B : ' RELOCI iSHED BY: • RECEIVED $V.• Cooler Receipt Inito+m elRon Siprtetura ! • r , +!. .1. ire 1 r Sl psalm: S19 7 Received; 2 ,C I .� l Bps lids To oO Atecaisred 'C i' 1i!•,,� Rat. arm :.. Deaf F+nfe: ,.: !� /7% �, � Guar! T1 1w3: CompanyAAdraes• Means of Deft iy I Way Bi0 P Othi aY i 00 1_ 2,firg 0 F4PQR To: vial 0% A149,M4A l yin a ' r Thl" hone. a ?Y— ...*:)100 P.O. Number t Fax: ' -q 110111111) i i � b Sam ID wavermismnimmnrumultummummummim mu IIIIIIIIIIIiIIIMIII■ ■fiIIIIIIItiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIt•IM!III IIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII —11111111111.■11111■■■■1111■■■■■■1111111111■111111. IIIIHNIIIIIIIIHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 11111111=111111111111111 1111111111111•11111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII COaAfEMS g711 TO Busuness Days a 15 Business Days �7 other. = N Business Ds r1J •..J ,/ arm a) v c.1.• • flLL- fLorq 4 (,t) (Prior Authoritaf on nequirod) RELb�VQUISNEO BY 5414'Le4: :" t:iVED B : ' RELOCI iSHED BY: • RECEIVED $V.• Cooler Receipt Inito+m elRon Siprtetura ! • r , +!. .1. ire 1 r Sl psalm: S19 7 Received; 2 ,C I Prinhrdi+lame: PrnstYrf Narrw: To oO Atecaisred 'C goo 1i!•,,� Rat. arm :.. Deaf F+nfe: ,.: !� /7% �, � Guar! T1 1w3: D/ Time: Means of Deft iy I Way Bi0 P Othi aY i 00 1_ 2,firg FROM : SOILPRO client Soil Processing Inc. Project Bells Flats water testing Cooler irt 1 A. Ina Eiple_mmmg_niriati Pon ase: FAX NO. : 9072749295 Nov. 11 2002 05: 00PM P10 • - • Cooler Receipt Form Client COCkt: 010680 Ordwr# J0211014 Dais cooler opened: 11/5/2002 Cooler opened by DW Slgnatwe: 1. Was airbill Attached? Yea AlrbIll ri: Goldstreak #1201 2884 Carder Name: Other 2. Custody Seals? Yes How many? 1 Location: on cooler Seal Name: JF 3. Seat intact? YeS 4. Screened for radiation? No 5. COC Attached? Yes Properly Completed? Yes Signed by AEL emefoyee? Yes 6. Project Identification from monody paper: Bells Flats --. 7. Preservative: BlueGel Temperature: Designated person initial here to acknowledge receipt: COMMENTS: 2.1 B. Lnc-In Phase! Samplea LOg-In Date: 11/5,2002 Log-in 13y: KU 1. Packing Type: Other 2. Were samples In separate bags? NIA 3. Were containers Intact? Yes 4. Number of bottles received: 2 5. Correct containers used? Yes 6. Sufficient sample volume? Yes 7. Bubbles in VOA samples? NIA 8. Was Project manager called and status discussed? No s Labels agree with COC? Yes Number or samples received: 1 Correct preservatives added? Yes 9. Was anyone Dolled? No Who was called? By whom? Date: COMMENTS: tilrered sample upon arrival Page 1 of FROM :SOILPRO Environmental Laborstoroc FAX NO. :9072749295 Nov. 11 2902 04:43PM P2 Analyttea Alaska Southeast 6438 Shaune Drive Juneau, AK 99801 (807) 7804968 Fax (907) 7804870 11/6/2002 Soil Processing Inc. 207 E. Northern Lights, Suite 103A Anchorage, AK 99503 Attn: George Cline Sample IdenlMaat on Work Cram #: 10211013 Date: 11/612002 Work ID: Sells Flats water testing pate Received: 11!5/2002 Lib Semple Number Client Description Lob Semple Number Client Description 1021 1013 -01 Settling Raid Endoad are the analytical rsautts ter the submitted sarnple(e). Please review the CAGE NARRATIVE fora dlecuselon of any date andror quality control Issues. Listings of data qualfiere, analytical codes, key detest, and QC relationships ore provided at the and of the report Sincerely, ' • David Wetzel Project Manager 'The Science of Analysis The Art ofS.Mce° FROM :SOILPRO FAX NO. :9072749295 Nov. 11 2002 O4:55PM P2 Case Narrative Analytic° Atasks Southeast Work Order: JOZ11 ©14 Samples were prepared and analyzed according following references: **Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and March 1983. * *Methods for the Determination of Metals in EPA /600/R- 94/1L1, May 1994. to EPA or equivalent methods outlined in the Wastes, USEPA 600/4 -79 -020, Environmental Samples, * *Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, USEPA 600/4 -79 -020, March 1983. REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ANALYTICA QA PLAN A Summary of our review is shown below, organized by test: SAMPLE RECEIPT: There were 1 samples received on 11/5/2002. Samples were received at a temperature of 2.1 deg C.in cooler 1 at Analytica- Juneau. The cooler was opened on 11/5/2002. Comments: filtered sample upon arrival Samples were received in good condition and in order per chain of cuLtody Teat Method: 180.1 - Turbidity, Nephelometric - (Turbidity) - Surface Water All method specifications were mat for this test. Samples were run. after the holding time had expired at the request of ADEC. Teat Method: 200.8 - Metals by ICP /M5 - ICPMS is - Surface Water All method specifications were met for this test. Test Method: 245.1 - Mercury by CVAA - Dissolved - Surface Water All method specifications were met for thin teat. FPOM :SOILPRO Detailed Analytical Report Wortorder (SDC!): Projeee Client: Cleat Project Number. Report Section: (Sent Sample Name: FAX NO. : 9072749295 Nov. 11 2062 04:43'M P3 10211013 Bells Flats water testing Soil Processing Inc. 3 Client Sample Report Analytioa Alaska Southeast Settling Pond Matrix: Surface Water Collection Date: 11/4/2002 1:30: 00PM Lab Sample Number: 70211013 -01A Amdyaia Date: 11 /5 /2002 1:40:41 PM Prep Date: 11/5/2002 Instrument CVAA„1 Analytical Method ID: 245.1 - Mercury by CVA A - Dissolved Pilo Name: Prep Method, YD: 245.1 Dilution Factor 1 Prep Brtcb Number: 1021106007 Report Bashi As Received Analyst ankh; CT Sample prep wt./vol; 20.00 all Prep Extract Vol: 20.00 m1 Banns fatitia Boob Vises Laid 151L MDL R jt, M.ewy 7434-07 -6 ND ue/I. 0.7o 0.058 1 Lab Sample Number. J0211013 -01A Analysis Date:. 11/5/2002 2:43:48PM Prop Data: 11/5/2002 Insnument Platt A nulytical Method TT} 210,8 - Meal. eats by ICP/MS • ICPMS Dist File Name: export 110502.v Prep Method ID: 30051CP Dilution Factor: 1 Prep Batch Number: 1021105004 Report Basis: As Received Analyst initials: SAW Sample prep wt./vol: 50.00 ml Prep Extract Vol: 50.00 1111 S:A81!le I'A Emma D i& wig __ Banla;lE: Mummy 7440 -36-0 147 41., 0.10 0.027 1 Anemic 7440 -38 -2 23.2 uel, 0.15 0.044 Barium 744039 -3 13.9 41. 0.25 0.052 Bayfium 7440 -41 -7 ND ugll. 0.15 0.045 Cadmium 7440 -43-9 ND ulL 0.20 0.062 Chromium 744047.3 1.34 ug+L 0.15 0.049 Nichol 7440 42-0 1.46 up'', 0.15 0.050 Srlrwxn 7794 -40-2 14.9 ug'L. 0.50 D.14 Thallium 744025.0 0.5971 ug/1. 0.050 0.017 Lab Sample Number. J0211013 -01B Analysis Date: 11/6/2002 10:30:00AM Prep Dare. 11/6/200'2 lusteunent Turbidometer Atudylical Method !D: 180.1 - Turbidity, Nepbalometric - (Turbidity) File Name: Prep Method 10: 180.1 Dilution Factor: 1 Prop Batch Number: 3021106006 Report Basis: As Received Analyst Initials: DW Sample prep wtivol: 1.00 ml • Prep Extract Vol: 1.00 ml Ambit SAM loath Elm Eift PSTL Ida i Turbidity 37 NTU 0.10 0.10 1 Page 3 of 9 FROM :SOILPRO Detailed Analytical Report Wadwtder (SW): Proiett COnttl Client Project Ntanbert Report Section: Client Sample Never Matrix: FAX NO. : 9072749295 Nov. 11 2002 04 : 43PM . P4 3021]013 Bells Flats water testing Sell Processing Inc. 3 Method Blank Report Analytica Alaska Southeast vdp Aqueous .1 ollection Date: 11/5/2002 12:00:00AM Lab SAM* Number Prop Date: Analytical Method 1D: Prop Method ID:. Prep Batch Number. Report Basis: Sample prep wt./vol: Mete memo J021106007 -MB 11/5/2002 245.l • Mercury by CVAA - Dissolved 245.1 J021106007 Dry Weight Basis 20.00 ml !v& 7435 -97.6 Rua rim Uslit ND us/1- l 0.20 EOM Analysis Date: instrument File Name: Dilution Factor. 11/5/2002. 1:40:41PM CVAA d Analyst Initials: cr Prep Extract Vol: 20,00 ml Lab Sample Number. Prop Date: Aaalytioal Method ID: Prep Method ID: Prep limb Number Report Basis: Semple prep wtJvol: ilrga Antimony Amok Barium Bay Dien Cadmium amnion' Nickel selenium J021105004-MB 11/5/2002 200.9 - Weds by ICP/MS • WCPMS Dina 3005 1CP J021105004 Dry Weight Batis 50.00 m1 CAM 74404641 NI) 7440 -3S-2 ND 7440-39-3 ND 7440-41 -7 NI) 7440-43-9 ND 7440 -47 -3 ND 7440 -92.0 ND 7784-49 -2 ND 7440.21-0 ND Biz Ups uL ug/L us/L ug/L ug/L ug'1. ug/L ug/L sfiL BE 0.10 0.027 0.15 0.044 0.23 0.002 0.15 0.045 0.20 0.062 O.15 0.049 0.15 0.030 0.50 0.14 0.030 0.017 Analysis Date: Lrstlument: File Name: Dilution Factor 11/5/2002 2: 1 5:0SPM Elan cxportl 10502.c 1 Analyst Initials: SAW Prep Extract Vol: 50.00 ml B&im& 1 Page 4 of 9 FROM :SOILPRO FAX NO. : 9072749295 Nov. 11 2002 04:44PM P5 Detailed Aaalyticsd Report wurtorder (SDG): 10211013 Project: Begs Flats water testing Clime Soil Pretesting Inc. Gnat Project Nwnbc i Prep Batch Number: Base Sample QC Sample Sansieuvoiyiis Der: Qt; tlandcAnd ria Orr: 3 J021105004 10211013 -91A ,10211013-01A-MS 11/5/2002 2:43:46PM 11/312002 2:47 :47P14 $Pipe Sea* Rs*. Analytica Masks Southeast Recovery Report iar* paler. ]0211013 5s Cosc Mal. Method: Sample Prop Date: Analysis Units: Matrix: QCDUreareamom tare Rowe 200.8 - Metals by ICP/MS - ICPMS Diss 11/5/2002 12:00'00AM 4/1, Aqueous LCI., UC1. Roc Fl Antimony Arsenic Sanwa Baytlium Cadmium Cienmium Nickel s61mitun Thalami 3.47 54.8 50.0 102.7 75 125 Z1.2 77.2 50.0 108.0 73 125 13.7 63.9 50.0 100.4 75 125 ND 31.7 30.0 63.4 73 123 owt 23 1.34 42.6 $0.0 94.5 75 125 1.46 49.0 30.0 95.1 75 125 14.9 72.3 50.0 114.1 75 123 00878 40.3 o. 96.4 75 125 Base Sample QC Sample QC Duplicate: D: QC Bard. Mrbd. Da s; Acolyte J021105004-MB .0211•5804 -LCS J8211S5004 -LCSD 1 (/3/7002 2:15:0813M 11/5/2002 2:190951M Same Spit Sp Dip Reath R. 1l Vito Cone Anal. Method: Sample Prep Dale: Annly:ais l JnilY: • Matrix: QC DUN NE*. Are1ri. 1 200.8 - Metals by ICPMS • ICPMS Diss 11/5/2002 12:00 :OOAM u8/• Aqueous 11/5/2002 2:23:39PM Remy SpikeIJup SPDIJP.R LCL /JCL RPD RPD F1 Cone 8C Rue PI Page 5 of 9 FROM :SOILPRO FAX NO. :9072749295 Detailed Analytical Report Workorder (SDG): J0211013 Project: Bells Flab water testing Clrietit: Soil Practising Inc, Clad Project Numbers 3 Prep Hatch Number: Bare Sample QC Simple isompkangssit Doe: QQ: &e* Aalris Doe: Assalyic 3021106007 10211.6007 -MB .10211061007 LCS 11 /5/2002 1:40:41PM ! 1/5/3102 1:40:41PM Sup. scam Ran* Rca. QC Recovery Report Wes i Order:J0211013 Nov. 11 2002 04:44PM P7 Mal. Method: Sample Prep c. ' Analysts Unite Matrix: QC DUPSemlie Analysis Date Ream Case 245.1 - Mercury by CV AA - Dissolved 11/5/2002 12:00:OOAM Aqueous 1071 1x-a, Rao Fl Mercary ND 4.11 3.75 100,6 SS HS FOOTNOTES TD QC REPORT Note 1: Results are shown to three sISeificent figures to avoid raundisg errors in calculation,. Note 2: Ifthc sample commutation is greater than 4times the :pike lave!. a recovery Is not calculated, and the resale should be used an a taplieate. In such cases the spike is not as high as expected random measurement variability of rho ample Mutt itself. Note 3: For ample duplicates, if the result is less than the PQI., the duplicate RPD is not applicable and is disown as 0. If the sample and duplicate results ate not five times the PQL or greater, then the RPD Is not expected to fall within the window shows and the comparison should he made on the basis of the absolute difference. Analytioa uses the criterion that the atxalute difference abould he less don the PQL for wiser or less than 2XPQL for other matrices. Page 7 0[ 9 FROM :SOILPRO FAX NO. : 9072749295 Nov. 11 2002 04:44PM P6 Detailed Analytical Report Analytica Alaska Southeast Workorder (SD% J0211013 Prglesc Balls Flats water testing Client: Soil Processing be. Mat Project Number: 3 QC Recovery Report /Pork O'er. /0211013 Prep Batch Number: 3021105004 Base Sample .10211s5104 -MB QC Sample J03 /105004-LCS QC Duplicate: J021105004 -WSD SimpktAirOs Mee 11/5/7002 2:15:013PM QC. Hawk Andy$ I: 11/S/2002 2:1909PM Analyze 911321). Result Anal. Medved: Sample Prep Dete: Analysis Units: Matrix: QCDUPihmpleMalyme Debt 200,8 - Metals by ICP/MS - ICPMS Dies 11/5/2002 12:00:OOAM Aqueous 11 /S/2002 22339PM Spike SpDup Spi h Remy SplcDup SPDUPS LCL UCJ. RI'D RR) PI Rim Pi Cone EC Ree. Res Colic mow..... Prep Batch Number: J021106006 Bus 6emple J0211•13-01B QC Sample 30211013-010 -DUP QC 'Duplicate: RrotpkAat ele lire QC so* Mari. Anaiyte 1 1/6/2002 10.30:00AM 11/6/2002 10:30:00r M S. Result Dap Res Anal. Method: Sample Prep Date: Analysis Units: Matrix: QCDUPSampleAralysii Date 1 80.1- Turbidity, Nep11e1omettic - (Turbidity) 11/6/2002 12:00 :OOAM NT1J Aqueous 11/64/102 1030:00AM DUPRPD DUPUCl, DUFF) Ttzbthity 37.2 37,0 0.5 211 Prep ]latch Number: Base Sample QC Sample QC Duplicate: r rpleAmb le n.tc QC Smote Amble We: Analyse J021106007 30211613 -01A .T0211013.OJA -DUP 11/3/2002 140541PM 11/S/1002 1:40 41PM Same Result Dup Ras Anal. Method Sample Prep Date: Analysis Units: /L Mix: QC DUPaaepte Ma1yk3 Dote 245,1- Mercury by CVAA - Dissolved 11/5/2002 12 :00 :0OAM Aqueous 11/3/2002 1:40 ;41PM WPM Dup1JC4, DUPI4 Memory ND ND 0 0.0 20 Page 6 of 9 FROM :SOILPRO FAX NO. : 9072749295 Nov. 11. 2002 04:45PM PB Detailed Analytical Deport Warkorder (SDG): 10211013 Project: Belli Flats water testing Olean Soil Processing Int. Cleat Protect Number. 3 Analytiea Alaska Southeast QC BATCH ASSOCIATIONS - BY METHOD BLANK 14 2110; Lab Method Blank Id: Prop Belch ID: Method: This Method Wank recd J0211013 •1A 10211014 -01A 1021105004 -LCS 7021105004 -LCSD 1021105004-MB 1021105004 200.5 • Mends by ICP/MS - ICPMS Diss sample preperatiow Web arc associated with the followiag c.7,1ionscanieloNAwm Datallle Settling Pond 13otoh QC LCS LCSD 70211014- 01A -DUP DUP 70211013-01A-MS MS Prop Ibesc: 11 /5/200 spikes, and dupl . Apalvsispato 11/5/2032 7:43 :4$PM 11/5/2002 2 :35:44PM 11/5/2002 2 :19:09PM 1115/2002 2:23 :39PM 11/5/2002 2:39:47PM 11/5/2002 2:41:47PM export110502.oev export)10502.oav exportl10302.csv exponl 10502.cav expart1105O2.cev export'10502.cav Lab Method Blank Id: .1021106007-MB Prep Batch ID: J071106007 Method 245.1 - Mercury by CVAA - Dissolved This Method Wank and sample proportion batch era armci4ed with the following ramplee, spikes, ersd SamdaNuxo Clisggliamidima DataFilp 10211013 -01A SatUiag Pad .10211014-01A I3atchQC J021106007 -LCS I•CS 80211013-01A -DUP DUP J021101441A -MS MO Prop Dale; 11/5/2002 dupticatas; 11/512002 1:40:41PM 11/5/2002 1 :40:4IPM 11/5/2002 1 ;40 :41PM 17/5/2002 I :40:41PM 11/5/2002 1:40:41PM Page 11 of 9 FROM :SOILPRO FAX NO. : 9072749295 Nov. 11 2002 04:4M1 . P9 Detailed Analytical Report AnaLytiea Alaska Southeast Workorder (SDG): 10211013 Project: Dells Fasts water testing Cleat Soli Processing Inc. Client Prefect Nvatber. 3 DATA FLAGS AND DEFINITIONS The PQL is the Method Quantitation Limit as defined by USACE. Reporting Limit Limit blow which results are shown en ND". This may be tide PQL, MDL, or a value between. See the report conventions below. Result Field: ND - Not Defected et or above the Reporting Limit NA - Anelyb not applicable (see Case Narrative for dscussion) Qualifier Fields: LOW Recovery is below Lower Control Limit HIGH Recovery . RPD. or other parameter is above Upper Control Limit E - Reported coacaetra>ion is above the insttument calibration upper range Organic Analysis Flags: B = Analyte was detected in the laboratory method blank J.- Analyse was detected above MDL a Reporting Limit but below the Quant Limit (PQL) Inorganic Analysis Pings 1- Analyle was detected above the Reporting Limit but below the Quail* Limit (PQL) W - Post digestirm spike did not meet criteria S Reported value determined by the Method of Standard Additions (MSA) Other Flags may be applied. See Case Narrative for Description REPORTING CONVENTIONS 1tOk THIS REPORT TestPkgNaise Beals 180.1/180.1 (Aqueous) - (Turbidity) M Received 200.R/200.8 (Aqueous) - ICPMS Diss As Received 245.1/245.1 (Aqueous) - Dissolved As Received 300.0/300.0 (Aqueous) - Juneau As Received 335.2/335.2 (Aqueous) - Total CN As Received # 8lti Figs RetoorN lg Lhnit 2 Report to PQL 3 Report to PQL 3 Report to PQL 3 Report to PQL 2 Report to PQL Page 9 of 9 Nov. 11 2002 04:46PM P10 FROM :SOILPRO eliw.ethAve. ANALYTIC2k "MA 11956W F : {907) 2E8-5E34 ALA SKA IN 5438 Shame Wm Juneau, Al( 99894 907) 790-61388 F • pm 790.8670 121139 Pennsykterie Street LAN: 1,z) Thornton. CO 80241 800)8738707 FAX: (303)469.5254 Oucte: /02, I 6 00 Project 1DP. Fr -,11, www.analyttcagroup.corn Chain of Custod Record i Ana sis Re • uest Cotnp N Project Name: &-4(SegfeS r.-12- AN ty EPA Ei0 _ TAqH ty EPA 610/802 , .4 i t 4t , 4"' v, I Z. , -, Company Addams: 07 O' Ah 40745 146 /0 09' ,e. 1$11 • 4 -.' F; T1 To Mete To: Talaraone: allg=320=4 P. N r; Fax: 42 q- c2 9,5 i imp Emelt 0. e 0 • , A.A Sample ID ,/," • ■ j 6 A.', ,L , TM mo n •11CI• N.M r - m: . mum nummu. m u n• m.11 i6 11 eminm1in1n1u1 mmimmunn11IuFIm . immigs. milirmarginarigumil =NEN eimum. •minummumill=160. ilimp=mnig17.19givirrpappplorlim riminu. ............imme. MI III OM GM •swami liumml ..........mmominclorri,rinwzmic-erwirtervill co s t- -Teelallitegi1a. e i 1f 65(1-97171 .•••••'''..'-'-'-' g:022; i TfilhiC2,0Z rid rileth N kt C,C) . ERA LES ED • Irmrsumum_ TURNAflOUM il Dune! ? 1111.ael 2 (ADEC1 Or Level 9 0 Level 4 (USAGE) 0 Level s 0 Chrome:gems K Fis"a PDF • U CO W (V 1.2) C 594.° (Emil) 0 2 SusiNsa Dori' 0 5 Business Nye 0 1D-15 Dulness Wye Xother:A tes. elhaineee Days Cooler Receipt Irtometion RE IMOIASHED BY SAMPLER: rilLI CLOISHED BY: I i RECEIVED BY: • • L) , - , . I , . WI ‘ S • l , re I 4 Temp Received z. 1 `C Temp Received.. cC : : i POMO Muria e . I ' 1 : F7rm: i -.• : Men Mum . . Cage's: Seale: Courfer Foe: $ Da ine: ; i Aps. -. in: aW77iia : /1 ' Datalliate: /MA : .5klita.t. . .ka.0 1 a , PAG.E.I_ FROM :50ILPR0 FAX NO. :9072749295 Nov. 11. 2002 04:46PM P11 Cooler Receipt Form Client: Soil Procatxing Inc. Bells Flats water testing Project: Cooler ID: 1 A. Preliminary Examination Phase: 1, Was airtfN Attached? 2 Custody Seals? 3. Soais intact? 4. Screened for radiation? 5. COC Attached? Yes Yes Yes No Yes Client Code 018680 6. Project identlftcatiort from custody paper. 7. Preservative: BIueGel Date cooler opened: 11/512002 Cooler opened by: OW At: J0211013 Signature: AlrbMI >r: Goldatreak 81201 2884 Carrier Name: Other Flow many? 1 Location: ofl Cooler Seal Name JF Properly Completed? YeS Signed by AEL ern playN? Yes Bells Fitts Temperature: 2.1 Designated porson initial here to acknowledge receipt: COMMENTS: Loo-In Phase: Samples Log-In Date: 1. Packing Type: 2. Were samples in separate bags? 3. Were containers Intact? 4. Number of bottles received: 5. Correct containers used? 8. Sufficient sample volume? 7, Bubbles in VOA samples? Other N/A Yes 2 Yes Yea N/A 2 Log -in By: KU 8. Was Project manager called and statue discussed? 9. Was anyone called? No Who was called? COMMENTS: tittered sample upon arrival Libels agree with COC? Number of samples resolved: Correct preservatives added" No Yes 1 Yes By whom? Date: Pape 1 of SPI, Inc. Soil Remediation Unit Located in Kodiak, AK Summary Report Particulate Testing Prepared for: SPI, Inc. 207 E. Northern Lights Anchorage, AK 99503 Prepared by: Alaska Source Testing, LLC 520 W 58th, Unit A Anchorage, Alaska 99518 November 11, 2002 Alaska Source Testing SPI, Inc. 2002 Report Certification As Project Manager, I certify that the testing was performed in accordance with approved methods and the data, calculations and results described in this report are true and accurate. W.M. Hudson Signature Date Alaska Source Testing SPI, Inc. 2002 SPI, Inc Particulate Matter Summary Report Table of Contents Page Report Certification Acknowledgments Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. SUMMARY OF RESULTS 1 2.1. Particulate Test Results 1 2.2. Visual Surveillance 1 3. SOURCE DESCRIPTION 2 4. SAMPLE LOCATION AND TRAVERSE METHODOLOGY 2 5. OPERATIONS AND TESTING CONDITION 2 6. TEST PROCEDURES AND APPARATUS 2 7. CALCULATIONS 8 8. QUALITY ASSURANCE 9 Appendices A. Emission Results With Example Calculations B. Field Data Sheets C. Laboratory Data D. Operational Data E. Quality Assurance Data F. Project Participants List of Tables 2.1 Summary of Particulate Test Results 1 List of Figures Fig. 4.1 Analyzer Ports & Traverse Points Fig. 6.1 Method 5 Particulate SarnplingTrain 3 5 Alaska Source Testing 1. INTRODUCTION SPI, Inc. 2002 SPI Inc., Soil Processing Incorporated, operates a soil remediation unit that is currently located in Kodiak, Alaska. To comply with conditions in general operating permit (GP-4) number AA000204, SPI Inc. engaged Alaska Source Testing, LLC (AST) to perform a source test. The testing consisted of measuring total particulate (PM) in the exhaust gases of the unit. AST performed the emission testing on November 9-10, 2002. All procedures used during the particulate testing were conducted in accordance with USEPA Reference Methods as prescribed in 40 CFR 60, Appendix A; specifically methods 1, 2, 3A, 4, and 5. The visual opacity surveillance was performed in accordance with USEPA Method 9. Bill Hudson was project manager, on-site team leader and performed 6-minute opacity surveillance readings coinciding with each test run. Testing consisted of three, one-hour runs. This document provides a summary report of the emission testing results. 2. SUMMARY OF RESULTS 2.1. Particulate Test Results The results of sample runs are presented in Table 2-1. Table 2-1 Summary of Particulate Test Results Run Particulate Matter gr/scf Process Rate TPH 1 0.033 12.18 2 , 0.025 12.49 3 0.023 11.96 Average 0.027 12.21 *gr/scf = grains per standard cubic foot of exhaust gas 2.2. VISUAL SURVEILLANCE Visual surveillance observations were performed in accordance with USEPA Method 9. The field data sheet is included in Appendix B. The average opacity that was observed during the three- minute periods was 0%. 1 Alaska Source Testing 3. SOURCE DESCRIPTION SPI, Inc. 2002 Soil Processing Inc.'s soil remediation unit (SRU) is used for treating petroleum contaminated soils. The SRU is rated at 12 tons per hour. The SRU is equipped with a PowerCloneTM Model PC5-22 wet scrubber system and a SOIL/TEKTM Model 300 afterburner to control emissions. 4. SAMPLE LOCATION AND TRAVERSE METHODOLOGY The SRU has a 16-inch stack that transitions to 24 inches. The sample ports are located at a point where the stack diameter is18.5-inches. The ports,are oriented 90 degrees apart. The ports are located approximately 60 inches downstream and 22 inches upstream of the nearest disturbance. Figure 4-1 shows the cross-sectional area of stack at the sample location. The measurements for the traverse points are provided on the figure. 5. OPERATIONS AND TESTING CONDITIONS Please refer to Appendix E for copies of the unit log sheets during the tests. Run 1 2 Soil Feed Rate (TPH) 12.18 12.49 11.96 Particulate Control H20 Flow Rate (gal/min) 2.5 2.5 2.5 Pressure Drop across scrubber (in. H20) 3-4 3-4 3-4 Water Flow Rate (gal/min) 69 69 69 Make-up H20 Flow Rate, recycled H20 (gal/min) 8 8 8 Percent of fines less than 200 were 6%. Pond is 35 x 45 x 7 feet with a 10-mill liner. 6. TEST PROCEDURES AND APPARATUS The individual test procedures used during this testing program were conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Methods as prescribed in 40 CFR 60, Appendix A. The specific methods are listed below. Method 1 Method 2 Method 3A Method 4 Method 5 Method 9 Sample and velocity traverses for stationary sources Determination of stack gas velocity and volumetric flow rate (Type S Pitot tube) Determination of oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations in emissions from stationary sources (Instrumental Analyzer Procedure) Determination of moisture content in stack gases Determination of particulate emissions from stationary sources Visual determination of the opacity of emissions from stationary sources 2 Soil Processing Inc Port Locations and Traverse Points flow 4 18.5 inch 60 inches *4 22 inches Traverse Points In Inches 1 0.39 2 1.24 3 2.18 4 3.27 5 4.63 6 6.59 7 11.91 8 13.88 9 15.23 10 16.32 11 17.26 12 18.11 Note: Points 1-2 and Points 11-12 were combined as they were within 1/2 inch of stack wall. Alaska Source Testing SPI, Inc. _ 2002 The SRU ran normally and there were no shutdowns during the testing. The test equipment ran well except for the temperature controllers on the probe and filter heater. The temperatures were controlled manually. Occasionally, and for short durations, the temperatures varied from the intended set point of 250°F. Please refer to the data sheets where these temperatures were recorded. For this type of facility, those temperature variations would not affect sample results. The particulate testing consisted of three sample runs performed in accordance with Reference Methods 1 — 5. lsokinetic variation for runs 1-3 was 91.3%, 93% and 99.9%, respectively. All of these values meet Method 5 standards for isokinetic variation. Exhaust gas samples were collected using an Environmental Supply Company (ESC) Model C- 5000 Source Sampling System. A schematic of the particulate sample train is shown in Figure 6-1. The sample system components are described below. Sample Nozzle: The sample nozzle is a buttonhook shaped tube with a tapered edge on the outside circumference of the tip. Selection of the appropriate nozzle diameter size is essential to isokinetic sampling. Sample gases must pass through the nozzle at the same velocity and conditions as present in the stack. The nozzle materials may be borosilicate glass, quartz glass, Teflon, stainless steel, or Inconnel. The nozzle for this testing program was stainless steel with a nozzle diameter of 0.314 inches for Run 1 and 0.370 inches for Runs 2-3. Nozzle size was increased to pull more sample volume. Probe Assembly: This assembly includes the heated probe liner, a stainless steel probe sheath, stainless steel S-type Pitot tube and a K-type thermocouple sensor to monitor stack gas temperature. The probe was stainless steel. The probe liner was electrically heat traced and maintained a set point temperature of 250° F ± 25° F. A K-type thermocouple temperature is attached to the probe liner exterior surface to monitor and control probe temperature. The stainless steel probe sheath houses the probe liner. A tube fitting is welded to the front of the sheath to connect the sample nozzle. The S-type Pitot is tack welded to the exterior of the probe sheath. The K-type thermocouple sensor for stack gas temperature is attached to the Pitot tube. The tips of the Pitot tube and the thermocouple sensor are positioned to coincide with the tip of the sample nozzle. Sample Box: The sample box is the heated compartment that houses the filter assembly. The filter assembly serves to quantitatively collect particulate matter from the sample stream. A preweighed glass-fiber or quartz-fiber filter is used for particulate collection. The filter assembly is typically borosilicate glass and attaches to the probe liner with a ball/socket connection. The compartment heater is capable of maintaining a set point temperature of 250° F ± 25° F. The heating system is thermostatically controlled using a K-type thermocouple sensor. Hardware on the front of the box facilitates attachment and support of the probe assembly. A split train system was employed for SPI. The sample box connected to a 20-foot umbilical that was then connected to the impinger train. impinger Train and Ice Bath: The impinger train and ice bath tray serves to collect and quantify sample gas moisture. The glass impinger train attaches to the filter assembly by means of a 50-foot umbilical. The impinger train consists of 4 impingers connected by glass U-tubes with ball/socket connectors. The first 2 impingers are setup with 100 ml of 4 TEMPERATURE SENSOR PITOT TUBE TEMPERATURE SENSOR PROBE MPINGER TRAIN OPTIONAL, MAY BE REPLACED BY AN EQUIVALENT CONDENSER REVERSE TYPE PITOT TUBE PITOT MANOMETER ORIFICE THERMOMETERS IMPINGERS BYPASS MAIN VALVE VALVE VACUUM LINE VACUUM GAUGE ORIFICE MANOMETER Figure 6-1. Particulate Sampling Train AIR TIGHT PUMP Alaska Source Testing SPI, Inc. 2002 distilled water. The third impinger is left empty and the fourth impinger contains a silica gel desiccant to further enhance capture of sample moisture. The fourth impinger attaches to an exit connector with a K -type thermocouple to monitor the sample gas temperature. The connector attaches the sample system umbilical that consists of a sample hose, Pitot lines, electrical lines and thermocouple wire. The ice bath tray is simply an insulated container to hold the impinger train and the surrounding ice water. Care was taken at the end of each run to drain the 20 -foot umbilical into the first impinger. Note: To facilitate leak -free operations, all sample train connections from the probe liner to filter assembly and impinger train are made with ball and socket joints equipped with either Viton or Teflon O- rings. Control Console: The control console is the heart of the sample system. Components include a rotary vane vacuum pump with valves to draw and control the flow of sample gases through the system. The sample gas passes from the sample pump through a dry gas meter (DGM) that measures the sample volume to an accuracy of 0.001 cubic feet. K -type thermocouples are located on the DGM inlet and outlet to monitor average temperature. A flow orifice is attached to the outlet of the DGM. The console is equipped with a gauge to monitor system vacuum. Two digital temperature controllers are included to maintain probe and sample box temperatures. Double incline oil- filled manometers (0- 10" H2O) are located on the console front panel to indicate the differential pressures from the flow orifice (iH) and the Pitot measurement of stack gas velocity head (AP). A digital thermocouple readout is located on the panel. A small vacuum pump is included to facilitate collection of combustion gas samples for oxygen (02) and carbon dioxide (CO2). Quick- connect connectors are provided for sample and Pitot lines. Connections for the umbilical electrical line and thermocouple inputs are also provided in the front panel. Prior to beginning the particulate testing, preliminary checks were performed to ensure that the sample location was in accordance with Method 1. The number of traverse points was determined and the inside diameter of the stack measured. Preliminary measurements were collected for stack gas velocity head, temperature and moisture content.. Barometric pressure at the sample location was recorded. A check for cyclonic flow was conducted and data is included in Appendix B, Field Data. Data from the preliminary stack checks were input into an isokinetic slide -rule calculator to determine the'appropriate nozzle diameter. Using the preliminary test data and the actual diameter of the nozzle to be used, a K- factor was calculated to allow for appropriate flow adjustments and to maintain isokinetic sampling rates. The particulate testing consisted of three sample runs, each run consisting of 24 individual traverse points, 12 points for each of the sample ports. Each traverse, point was sampled for 2.5 minutes for a run length of 60 minutes. Prior to each sample run, the impinger train was prepared and a pre - sample impinger weight determined with a top loading electronic balance. The data was recorded on a field data sheet. The sample train was then assembled with a pre- weighed glass -fiber filter, the probe heat and sample box heaters were engaged and the system allowed to heat up to the set point 6 Alaska Source Testing SPI, Inc. 2002 temperature. A pre-run leak test was then performed with a vacuum up to 15" of mercury (Hg). Leak checks were also performed on the Pitot tube and Combustion gas sample lines. Once all of the leak tests had been successfully completed, the initial DGM reading was recorded. The stack port was opened and the sample train nozzle positioned to the first traverse point. The AP reading was recorded and sample flow initiated and adjusted for the appropriate isokinetic sampling rate. Data were recorded for AH, sample box temperature, impinger train exit temperature, . DGM inlet/outlet temperature and system vacuum. At the conclusion of sample point time the probe was immediately moved to the next point, the sample flow adjusted for iso- kinetics, and the data recorded. This procedure was repeated for each successive point along the traverse. At the conclusion of the sample run, the sample pump valve was closed and the probe was removed from the stack. The final sample volume was recorded from the DGM. A post-run leak check was performed at a vacuum equal to or greater than the highest vacuum recorded during the run. Once the system had cooled, sample recovery began by disassembling the train. The nozzle, probe assembly, and filter assembly were sealed with aluminum foil and removed to a clean location for recovery of the particulate sample. The nozzle was removed and rinsed 3 times with acetone. To assist in removing any residual particulate a small bristled brush was used during each rinse. The nozzle rinse was saved in a clean glass sample bottle. The probe was then cleaned in a similar manner using acetone and a probe brush. Three rinses were conducted. The acetone from the probe rinse was combined with nozzle rinse. A field check was performed for the acetone rinse and filter. After the field check, the filter assembly was sealed and moved to clean area. The sample bottle containing the nozzle/probe rinse was labeled with the run identification. The acetone level was marked for a volume determination at the laboratory. Both the petri dish and the nozzle/probe rinse samples were sealed and prepared for transport to a clean area. The impinger train was disassembled and final weights determined for each impinger (to the nearest 0.5 grams). The total grams of water captured was calculated and recorded on the field data sheet. A sample of the stack gas was withdrawn through a stainless steel tube attached to the probe assembly. The sample was continuously extracted into a Tedlar bag. At the end of the run the gas was analyzed on-site using a California Instrument 021CO2 analyzer. The analyzer was calibrated using EPA Protocol 1 gas prior to analyzing the bag sample. The instrument used for the analysis was a California Analytical Model 202 02/CO2 Analyzer. The instrument was calibrated prior to and following each of the sample runs. The instrument specifications are listed below. Oxygen Analyzer Components Carbon Dioxide Components Principle of Operation: Paramagnetic Principle of Operation: NDIR Span: 0-5%, 0-10%, 0-25% Span: 0-10%, 0-20% Linearity: Better than ± 1 % full scale Linearity: Better than ± 1 % full scale Zero/Span Drift: Less than ± 1 % full scale in 24 hours Zero/Span Drift: Less than ± 1 % full _ scale in 24 hours .7 Alaska Source Testing SPI, Inc. - ' • 2002 At the clean area, each filter sample was recovered from the glass filter assembly. Using a stainless steel spatula and forceps, the filter was removed and placed in a petri dish labeled with the filter identification number. A camelhair brush was used to remove any loose particulate from the front half of the filter assembly and brushed onto the filter. The front half of the filter assembly and the connecting glassware was then washed and brushed with acetone and the rinse combined with nozzle/probe rinses. After log-in of the samples, the particulate filters were transferred to an oven and allowed to desiccate for approximately two hours. at 250°F. The filters were then transferred to a desiccator for two hours. The sample was then weighed with an electronic analytical balance to the nearest 0.0001 grams. The nozzle/probe rinse sample was examined for any leakage and the volume recorded. The rinse was then transferred to a preweighed 250-milliliter glass beaker for analysis. The rinse sample was then evaporated to a dry residue on a hot plate and transferred to a laboratory oven at 105°C for 2 hours. The rinse sample beaker was then transferred to a desiccator and allowed to equilibrate to room temperature. The beaker was then weighed to the nearest 0.0001 grams. The total particulate value for each sample run was calculated by combining the net particulate catch from the filter sample with the net particulate residue from the nozzle/probe rinse sample. 7. CALCULATIONS All calculations were checked by a second party. Hand calculations have been performed to verify the spreadsheet calculations. Please refer to Appendix A for a printout of the spreadsheet and for the hand calculations. The major steps and basic principles of the Method 5 equations are as follows: • Correct the sample extraction volume measured by the control console dry gas meter to standard conditions; • Determine the moisture content of the stack gas from the volume of the water collected in the impinger train and convert to an equivalent volume of water vapor in sample gas; • Weight the total particulate recovered and divide the result by the corrected sample volume; • Determine the actual stack velocity based on the Pitot tube readings; • Using the cross-section area of the stack determine the volumetric flow rate of the exhaust gases in actual cubic feet per minute (acfm). Then corrected the volumetric flow rate to dry standard conditions at68° F and 29.92 inches of Hg (dscfm); • Calculate the isokinetic comparison of the corrected sample volume and the corrected stack velocity. This comparison validates that the correct volume of sample gas was extracted at the correct sample rate. This value must be between 90-110% for the run to be valid. Please refer to Appendix A for a summary of the calculation results. 8 Alaska Source Testing 8. QUALITY ASSURANCE SPI, Inc. - 2002 To ensure the collection of high quality and accurate data, AST strictly adhered to all the USEPA Reference Methods including the Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems Volume 111 during this testing program. In all other aspects of the testing, AST followed its own corporate Quality Program Manual QPM-1, 10/31/97. AST incorporated several measures to ensure successful, accurate sample collection and analysis. These measures are discussed below. 1) The ESC C-5000 source sampling train and other components used by AST meet or exceed method requirements. 2) AST performed pre and post-run leak tests to ensure sample collection integrity. AST also performed pre and post-test calibrations of the ESC C-5000 dry gas meter. 3) A single laboratory blank was performed. A comparison of the tare weight to the final weight was 0.1 mg. Documentation for all quality control/quality assurance activities for the sample collection is presented in Appendix E. Quality assurance data for the gravimetric analyses of the field and laboratory blanks are presented with the laboratory data in Appendix C. 9 Appendix A Emission Results, With Example Calculation Alaska Source Testing, LLC SPI Particulate Matter Emissions Run Number 1 2 3 DGM Volume cubic feet 25.431 37.493 31.567 DGM Y Factor - 0.99 0.99 0.99 DGM Average Temperature Degrees R 522 516 516 Barometric Pressure Inches Hg 29.35 29.41 29.62 Delta H inches Water 0.69 1.63 1.15 Sample Volume at Standard Conditions (Vmstd). Standard Cubic Feet 25.01 37.47 31.74 Total Volume of Water collected Milliliters 332.5 446.5 406.0 Standard Volume of Water (Vwstd) Standard Cubic Feet 15.651 21.017 19.110 Stack Gas Moisture Content - 0.3849 0.3593 0.3759 Pitot Tube Coefficient - 0.84 0.84 0.84 Average Pitot differential pressure Inches Water 0.183 0.19 0.123 Square Root of Differential Pressure - 0.428 0.436 0:351 Average Stack Gas Temperature (TsAv) Degrees R 626 623 629 Measured Stack Pressure Inches Water 0.1 0.1 0.1 Absolute Stack Pressure Inches Hg 29.36 29.42 29.63 Stack Oxygen 7.2 6.8 Stack CO2 % 9.6 10 10.5 Stack N2 % 43.9 46.9 45.1 Stack Gas Wet Molecular Weight lb/lb mole 26.0 26.3 26.2 Actual Average Velocity (Vs) ft/sec 27.81 28.09 22.67 Stack Diameter ft 1.33 1.33 1.33 Stack Area sq ft 1.40 1.40 1.40 Standard Stack Gas , Volumetric Flow Standard Dry Cubic Feet/min 1190.7 1261.0 989.1 Total PM Collected mg 53.0 59.9 47.9 Particulate Concentration gr/scf 0.0326 0.0246 0.0232 Particulate Emission - lb/hr 0.333 0.266 0.197 Nozzle Diameter inches 0.314 0.370 0.371 Nozzle Area sq ft 0.000537758 0.000746674 0.000750715 Sample Time min 60 60 60 Iso-kenetics % 91.31 93.02 99.89 SPI, Inc. Example Method 5 Calculation Run 3 Dry Gas Meter (DGM) Volume Vm : 31.567 cubic feet DGM Y Factor: 0.99 DGM Average Temperature Tm : 516° R Barometric Pressure Pbar: : 29.62" Hg Average Delta H dH: 1.15" H2O Sample Volume at Standard Conditions Vmstd (USEPA Method 5 Eq. 5-1) Vmstd = K1VmY ((Pbar dH/13.6)/Tm) K1= 17.64 °R/ in. Hg Vmstd = 17.64 °R/ in. Hg *31.567 ft3*0.99((29.62 in Hg + 1.15" H20/13.6)/516° R) Vmstd = 31.735 Standard Cubic Feet Moisture Content (USEPA Method 5) Total Water Collected in Sample Train: 406.0 ml Vwstd = K2 Vic (Eq. 5.2) Where: Vwstd = Volume of water vapor in the gas sample in standard cubic feet K2 = 0.04707 ft3/mI = total volume of liquid collect in ml at standard conditions Vwstd = 0.04707 (406 ml) Vwstd = 19.110 sft3 Bws = Vwstd/(Vmstd Vwstd) (Eq. 5-3) Where B5 = Moisture content of the sample gas expressed as a fraction Bws = 19.110/(31.735 + 19.110) = 0.3758 Average MW Method 3A 02 Average: 6.8% Method 3A 002 Average: 10.5% N2% = 100- 02% - CO2% - H20% N2 % = 100 6.8 — 10.5 — 87.58 = 45.12% Average MW (Ms) = (02 %/100)(32) + (CO2%/100)(44) (H20%/100)(18) + (N2%/100)(28) Average MW = (6.8/100)(32) + (10.5/100)(44) + (37.58/100)(18) + (45.12/100)(28) = 26.19 Velocity Calculation (40 CFR 60 App. A Method 2) Average Pitot differential pressure (ip): 0.123" I-120 Average stack'temperature (T): 629°R Measured Stack Static Pressure: 0.1" H20 Vs = Kp*Cp*/(Ap)av *ATs(av) P (Eq. 2.9) Where: Vs = Velocity in Standard Feet per Sec (fps) Kp = 85.49 ft/s[(Ib/Ib mole)(in. Hg)/(°R)(in. H20)]112 Cp = Pitot tube coefficient = 0.84 (dimensionless) Ap = Measured velocity head in inches of H20 Ts = Average Stack temperature in °R Ps = Absolute Stack Pressure in inches of Hg Ms = Molecular weight of the Stack gas (wet) Ps = Ambient Pressure + Stack Pressure 1 inch H20 = 0.0736 inches Hg Ps = 29.62" Hg + (0.1"H20)(.0736)in. Hg/in. H20 = 29.63" Hg Vs = 85.49(.84)( N/0.123)* N/(629/(29.63*26.19)) = 22.67 fps Volumetric Calculation (Method 2) Stack Diameter: Stack Area: 1.33 ft 1.40 ft2 Qsd = 60 (1-Bws)VsA(TSTDrrs av)(PdPsTD) (Eq. 2-10) Where: Qsd = Dry volumetric stack gas flow rate corrected to standard conditions (dscf/min) Bws = Volume of water vapor in stack gas (%/100) Vs = Average velocity (ft/sec) A = Stack cross sectional area (ft) TsTD = 530° R PSTD = 29.92 in Hg Qsd = 60(1- 0.3759)(22.67)(1.40)(530/629)(29.63/29.92) = 991.7 dscf/min Particulate Concentration Total PM Collected (Mn) Cs = 0.001 g/mg Mn Nmstd Cs = 0.001 (47.9)/31.735 Cs = 0.00151 g/ft3 1 g/ft3 = 15.43 grains/ft3 Cs = 0.0233 grains/ft3 47.9 mq Please Note: Small differences result from rounding. lsokinetic Variation Sample Time: Nozzle Diameter: Nozzle Area: 60 minutes 0.371inches 0.000750715 ft2 I = (K4TsVmstd)/(PsVsAnT(1-Bws)) (Eq. 5-8) Where: I = Isokinetic variation K4 = .0945 An = Nozzle diameter in ft2 T = Sample time I = (0.0945(629°R)31.735 sft3)/(29.63" Hg (22.67 ft/sec) .000750715(60 min)(1- 0.3758) I = 99.88% METHOD 5 DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION USING CRITICAL ORIFICES 1) Select three critical orifices to calibrate the dry gas meter which bracket the expected operating range. 2) Record barometric pressure before and after calibration procedure. 3) Run at tested vacuum from Orifice Calibration Report), for a period of lime necessary to achieve a minimum total volume of 5 cubic feel. 4) Record readings in outlined boxes below, other columns are automatically calculated. DATE: METER PART #: 8126102 85 -S METER SERIAL 8: CRITICAL ORIFICE SET SERIAL #: ORIFICE RUN FACTOR (AVG) TESTED VACUUM (in Hg) 16 19 23 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 0.417 21 0.417 21 0.417 21 0.5003 21 . 0.5003 21 0.5003 21 0.6384 19 0.6384 19 0.6384 19 DGM READINGS (FT') INITIAL FINAL NET (V,„) 978.290 984.728 984.728 990.202 990.202 995.676 995.676 1,002.250 1,002.250 1,008.887 1,002.25D 1,008.887 1,024.270 1,032.557 1.024.270 1,032.557 1,032.557 1,040.840 6.438 5.474 5.474 6.574 6.637 6.637 8.287 8.287 8.283 BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (in Hg): INITIAL 29.91 AMBIENT TEMPERATURES °F DGM INLET DGM OUTLET INITIAL FINAL INITIAL FINAL DGM AVG Qurrfilp - S'errice - Rrtiuhilirr FINAL 29.88 ELAPSED TIME (MIN) 8 ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPLY COMPANY AVG (P,.r) 29.895 DGM AH (in H2O) IF Y VARIATION EXCEEDS 2.00 %, ORIFICE SHOULD BE RECALIBRATED (1) V,, (STD) (2) V, (STD) (3) Y Y VARIATION ( %) AH9 62.8 ' 60 63 59 61 62.8 63 65 61 63 62.B 65 66 63 65 64.7 66 69 65 66 64.7 69 71 66 68 64.7 69 71 66 6B 64.5 74 76 70 72 64.5 74 75 70 72 64.5 75 75 72 72 USING THE CRITICAL ORIFICES AS CALIBRATION STANDARDS: The folbxdng equations are used 10 tabulate the standard vobmes of air passed through the DGM, V°, (std), and the critical orifice, V4, (std), and the DGM caibtation factor, Y. These equations are automatically tabulated in the spreadsheet above. (1) Vm (Std) _ K1 Vm Pbnr+ (AH/13.6) Tm 60.75 63 64.75 66.5 68.5 68.5 72.75 72.75 73.5 12.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.7 1.7 1.7 2.8 2.8 2.8 6.5427 6.5445 1.0003 2.2694 5.5391 5.4538 0.9846 2.2694 5.5206 5.4538 0.9879 2.2694 AVG = 0.9909 -0.36 6.6160 6.5313 0.9872 22416 6.6541 6.5313 0.9815 2.2416 6.6541 6.5313 0.9815 2.2416 AVG = 0.9834 -1.12 8.2643 8.335B 1.0087 22667 8.2643 8.3358 1.0087 22667 82487 8.3358 1.0106 2.2667 AVG = 1.0093 1.48 AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION FACTOR, Y = = Net volume of gas sample passed through DGM, corrected to standard conditions K, = 17.64'Rfin. Hg (English), 0.3858 "K/mm Hg (Metric) T,,, = Absolute DGM avg. temperature (°R - English, `'K - Metric) 0.9945 AVERAGE AH9 = 2.2592 ©H�= 0.758 Pbar 0 Vcr(std) (2) Vcr (std) = K' '\f Tamb . = Volume of gas sample passed through the critical orifice, corrected to standard conditions Tm,,, = Absolute ambient temperature ( °R - English, °K - Metric) IC = Average K' factor from Critical Orifice Calibration (3) Y = Vcr (std) = DGM calibration factor Vm (std) AH Critorif 040. 2 MAINTENANCE I 2.1 CONTROL CONSOLE Periodic inspection of the C-5000 Source Sampler console components is essential to maintain proper operation of the system. Regular maintenance will insure a long system lifetime. 2.1.1 Maintenance Access The C-5000 console components are designed to be easily accessible by removal of only the rear panel for periodic inspections anti maintenance. Having the plumbing and electical panels mounted independently will be much appreciated. The front and rear covers can be removed by releasing the eight cover latches (four on each). It is seldom necessary to remove the casing wrap, however, if this becomes necessary, first unscrew the eight electrical and plumbing panel securing screws located on the sides and top of the casing wrap. Second, the ventilating fan wires must be disconnected at the terminal plug located on the side of the fan housing. Finally, unscrew the 6 base securing screw and remove the casing wrap by lifting straight up with care not to disturb the remaining assembly. To maintain stability of the console plumbing and electrical panel assemblies the screws securing these panels to the base should remain in place. Alternatively, the plumbing and electrical panel assemblies may be individnally removed for specific maintenance procedures by unscrewing the top, side and base panel securing screws. For ease of removal, unscrew the 3 casing wrap-to-base securing screws on the side corresponding to the electrical or plumbing panel that is being i moved. Pull the lower edge of the casing wrap slightly away from the base to release the panel from behind the curled edge of the casing wrap and maneuver the panel carefully towards the front of-the unit. Check the general condition of all components and make necessary repairs. The oil level in the small oiler bottle must be maintained to prevent damage to the vacuum pump.. 2.1.2 Pump A Gast fiber vane vacuum pump draws the stack gases through the sample train This rotary pump is a precision instrument with .002 clearance at the top and .0025"—.0035" total at the ends of the rotor. The vanes self-adjust with wear and should last 5,000-15,000 hours depending:upon operating conditions. It is designed for pumping dry air and should be protected against dirt and excessive moisture. With proper treatment and regular lubrication this pump requires little additional maintenance to insure a long working life. Regular Pump Maintenance There is a small hole in the -top of the rear panel for regular inspection of the knockout jar. This jar should be emptied when accumulated oil interferes with the normal flow of air to the dry gas meter. Frequent removal and cleaning of the oiler jar is required when the oil level is low or the oil is dirty. An inspection port and removable panel are located on the right rear side of the unit. Unscrew the oiler jar and fill with dean oil as CO • CO2 •CH, • 02 • SO2 GAS ANALYZERS rmat paw " • me. IR%. • 4IHRfE ;O:MPCNpt...4,7,t4NRE,YZ,4,,:e:1 California Analytical Instruments, Inc. SPECIFICATION SPECIFICATIONS NONDISPERSIVE INFRARED (NDIR) OXYGEN SAMPLE CONTACT MATERIAL Stainless steel and Tygont. disposable gold plated cell liner. Window material CaF2 Platinum, Glass, Stainless Steel, Viton and Tygont Stainless Steel and Tygont • RANGES See Table,.Page 3 • ::-: : :; ., . See...:Table, Page 3". . , See:Table,.Page 3 LINEARITY Better than 1% Full Scale Better than 1% Full Scale Better than 1% Full Scale REPEATABILITY : . .• • --• - - - Betterthan.t%. ,.:. .::. : .. Full Scale: :..;`Y". "':..' :4•FultSealez..1.;!i:::- "Better-par-0% . .-'-,. .:. ..:: - ..= . • 's: Betterthan:1.%. Full;Scale: - • - RESPONSE TIME 90% of Full Scale in less than 1 second* 90% of Full Scale in 2 seconds 90% of Full Scale in 5 seconds SAMPLE FLOW RATE 0.5 to 2 liters/minute: - . . s :Iter/minute . • 1:.liter/minute: NOISE Less than 1% Full Scale Less than 1% Full Scale Less than 1% Full Scale ZERO & SPAN DRIFT " -. • Less.tharr-.1:.% of FulI,Scale.,:" in.24-hours. .... :.';;:. --....: tLess-tharit of FulI Scale. ii-J:2*-hauthA;;;•:;! . :- . ,Less,than.Mot: Full Scale. in 24ihours ZERO & SPAN, ADJUSTMENT Ten turn potentiometer Ten turn potentiometer Ten turn potentiometer DISPLAY . ,. . - . Si:f. -IndividuaWhAigit ,1:71."7 •.: -. .,.Z.:::. panel meter '''.""3.''' 3.A.._:,cligitpeneilrneter., .: .: Kq.,i.V.117:::i;;.',i.40.: j'.-7-.1:,::- :, Z1/2.ciigitpenekrneter,-:;z:"- i • ::::,:.:':-.:•:-" ';:,'.:: ,: : OUTPUTS Select: 0-10VDC or 4-20 or 0-20mA (RS-232 optional) Select: 0-10VDC and 4-20 or 0-20mA (RS-232 optiona() Select: 0-10VDC and 4-20 or 0-20mA (RS-232 optional) ALARMS (optional) .. .. .. 2 each!:.:44.:1-- For. CZTISA' -.S- PDT m and ii;...,-.',::=4;:- ?•=::',., "Forml.:X5A. S PST '*,.:e7-::: • (Dry RelarContacts): . :Singleor-Dual:::`,4:::. -.;:. -:" - .._. iSPDT.:5K .:-: n-7i::,...-_-.::1:1 :: :::. (DriFielai.toonticie) *..:;. • :, .- fr.:.1:',:::* :.. 1 -:* : Single:Pr Dtiali:: . .. . :SPDT-.:Sk - (Dry:RelaiContacts). • ' ' — • ' ' '"' .;.. • ' AMBIENT TEMPERATURE -5 to 45°C -5 to 45°C -5 to 45°C SAMPLE TEMPERATURE 0 to 50°C. - - •0 to 50°C • 0.to 50°C: SAMPLE CQNDIT(QN Clean, non-condensing gas Clean, non-condensing gas Clean, non-condensing gas FITTINGS 1/4" tube 1/4" tube 1/4"tube POWER REQUIREMENTS 115/220/240 VAC, 50/60 Hz, 70 watts/channel 115/220/240 VAC, 50/60 Hz, 70 watts/channel -115/220/240 VAC, 50/60 Hz, 70 watts/channel DIMENSIONS 514"H x 19"W x 23"D 133mm x 483mm x 508mm • 5IA"H xl 9"W x 15"D 133mm x 483mm x 381mm 51/4"H x19"W x 15"D 133mm x 483rnm x381mm RELATIVE HUMIDITY Less than 90% R.1-1." Less than 90% R.H.— Less than 90% R.H." WEIGHT (zingle unit) 24 lbs. .(approximate) . 10.8 Kg - - 15 lbs. (approximate) 6.8 Kg 10 lbs. (approximate) 4.8 Kg epnding on cell length and flow rate "Non-condensing Spechications are subject to change without notice California Analytical Instruments, 1238 West Grove Avenue, Orange, California 92865-4134 Telephone: (714) 974-5560 • Fax: (714) 921-2531 Web site: www.gasanalyzers.com r 1.C 1958 Caulomm Analyncal instruments. Mc. ?Typo is a registered trademark of Me lQpflgn Performance Plastics Corporation 9449BSOL CERTIFICATE of ANALYSIS In erence-Free Multi-Component EPA Protocol Gases Number: )2 ay Date: 2/01 tomer: Source Testing CyI. Pressure:* SOOpsig Expiration Date: 04/11/04 Document Number: 8249451 Carbon Dioxide Oxygen :edure: &-t4,01,atAe .ANSAP. E: Analytical uncertainty and NIST ;ability are in compliance with -600/R-97/123 ufacturer: lel Number: al Number: lytical Principle: : Calibrated: KVB/Analect EN3024 3024 FTIR 03/28/01 1-1141PV VA12,47--s, , -------- ------------- -------------- ----- anufacturer: Model Number: Serial Number: Analytical Principle: MPC Calibrated: Servomex 4605C 1101 Paramag. 03/23/01 Manufacturer: Model Number: Serial Number: Analytical Principle: MPC Calibrated: llagnar' WOW 0.28 8.52 . 18. 4,4 YARke e 13.42 13.44 13.45 E'RI 12.99 13.00 13.02 ifiRMANARMEM,4 Moar Res 2:0143;090%;;;‹ Carbon Dioxide • WAWA atRatUt t,AAL,CAPWRANt x4/12ittrTt7: t;,;.7.0- WWMPJ-641,2a4ww.:7--, 7 .' Tir,, ' nit ililff .1.:12, `.,,,;:x5ik ..‘i.'--.'; ',A.41,- t; :-.0, hr- '":.; , VirOti-M , 0.52 0.52 0.52 " ' „ a" ' 10.28 10.29 10.29 ‘V Component 2 If Cndidate 4A0 4.40 4.40 ; Oxygen , ,..6 Candidae tiM 4.00 4.00 4.00 k.-V.i':::t .MeaResu1t, Utswi„,?, : %sr: ..;:,!..A Z.S.Wiage K4UP,Mioa0:` lfs;...22:KW.::..X.R..00.40,C.: Air Liquide America Corporation 11426 Fairmont Parkway, La Porte, Texas 77571-6000 Phone: (281) 474-8400 Fax: (281) 474-8419 e• FROM :SOILPRO FAX NO. :9072749295 Nov. 11 2002 04:35PM. P42 Appendix F Project Participants Alaska Source Testing SPI November 2002 Project Participant Role Bill Hudson Project Manager (Alaska Source Testing) George Cline SPI, Inc. Terry Steiner SPI, Inc. Matt Wilkenson ADEC Observer Shelley Hokenson Technical Writer Qk.)IL PROCESSING iNCORPORAItO PORTABLE THERMAL UNITS • OILFIELD SERVICES • ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP Duane Dvorak Kodiak Island Borough 710 MILL Bay Road Kodiak, AK 99615 December 18, 2002 Duane, Enclosed please find copies of all the analytical results. Included are the results from the Pit 1 pond particulate test. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me © 274-3000. Sincerely, George H. Cline L DEcEilvE DEC 20 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 207 E. Northern Lights Blvd., Suite 103A • Anchorage, AK 99503 Telephone (907) 274-3000 FAX (907) 274-9295 Analytica Alaska Incorporated website: www.analyticagroup.com ANALYTICA Environmental Laboratories I 2/9/2002 Soil Processing Inc. 207 E. Northern Lights, Suite 103A Anchorage, AK 99503 Attn: George Cline Lab Sample Number Work Order #: A0212015 Date: 12/9/2002 Work ID: Bells Flat Unit Date Received: 12/4/2002 Sample Identification Client Description Lab Sample Number Client Description A0212015-01 Pit 1 Pond Partic. A0212015-02 TB Enclosed are the analytical results for the submitted sample(s). Please review the CASE NARRATIVE for a discussion of any data and/or quality control issues. Listings of data qualifiers, analytical codes, key dates, and QC relationships are provided at the end of the report. Sincerely, Jason Gray Project Manager "The Science of Analysis, The Art of Service" Case Narrative Work Order: A0212015 ADEC Laboratory Approval Number: UST -014 SAMPLE RECEIPT: There as one samples for Bells Flat project received at Analytica- Anchorage on 12/4/2002. Samples were received at a temperature of 6.0°C on 12/4/2002. Samples were properly packed and in good condition. See the,enclosed Chain of Custody and Cooler Receipt Forms for further details of sample receipt. Sample ID- Pit 1 Pond Particle consisted of a 1 Liter clear water sample with a small amount of suspended fine particulate matter contained in the aqueous matrix. There was insufficient quantity of the particulate matter available (estimated at less than 0.5 gram solids) to perform filtration and extraction of only the suspended solids. The entire water sample, including the suspended particulates was extracted which results in detection of any DRO/RRO present in the particulates fines or which were dissolved in the aqueous phase. DRO/RRO sample concentration results are calculated based on the volume of water originally present, as the weight of particulate sample matter would be too small to separate and accurately determine.. The DRO/RRO chromatogram is consistent with the expected hydrocarbon profile of a heavy weight (RRO) hydrocarbon lubricating oil. It is likely that majority of the DRO/RRO detected in the sample resulted from the particulate matter as the expected solubility of typical RRO hydrocarbon in aqueous phase is extremely low. GRO/BTEX analysis was also performed on the entire aqueous phase as separate analysis of the particulate matter is unfeasible without loss of volatile analytes from the sample. QUALITY CONTROL All applicable ADEC methodology requirements were followed and all quality control objectives were met for this project. Detailed Analytical Report Workorder (SDG): A0212015 Project: Bells Flat Unit Client: Soil Processing Inc. Client Project Number: 'Soil Processing Report Section: Client Sample Report Client Sample Name: Analytica Alaska Inc. Pit 1 Pond Partic. Matrix: Aqueous Collection Date:.. 12/4/2002 1 :0O:OOPM The following test was conducted by: Analytica - Anchorage Lab Sample Number: A0212015 -01B Analysis Date: 12/9/2002 12:23:OOPM Prep Date: 12/6/2002 Instrument: Roo Analytical Method ID: ADEC AK102/103 - (DRO & RRO) File Name: R2120959.D Prep Method ID: 3510 Dilution Factor: 1 Prep Batch Number: A021206005 Report Basis: As Received Analyst Initials: GD Sample prep wt. /vol: 980.00 ml Prep Extract Vol: 1.00 mi Analvte CASNo Result Flags Units PL MDL • Rerun #: Diesel Range Organics n/a 0.12 J mg/L 0.16 0.033 1 Residual Range Organics n/a 0.78 mg/L 0.28 0.055 Surrogate CASNo Result Flags Units POL MDL Spike % Recov LCL UCL Rerun #: o- Terphenyl 84 -15 -1 0.051 mg/L 0.011 0.0023 0.051 100 50 150 I Squalane 111 -01 -3 0.054 mg/L 0.015 0.0029 0.051 106 50 150 The following test was conducted by: Analytica - Anchorage Lab Sample Number: A0212015 -01A Analysis Date: 12/9/2002 10:33:OOAM Prep Date: 12/9/2002 Instrument: Natasha Analytical Method ID: GRO by ADEC AK10I & BTEX by 8021B File Name: N2120907.D Prep Method ID: 5030 Dilution Factor: 1 Prep Batch Number: A021209001 Report Basis: As Received Analyst Initials: STE Sample prep wt. /vol: 5.00 ml Prep Extract Vol: 5.00 ml Analvte CASNo Result Flags Units POL MDL Rerun #: Benzene 71 -43 -2 ND ug/L 1.0 0.15 1 Ethyl benzene 100 -41 -4 ND ug/L 1.0 0.18 Gasoline Range Organics n/a ND ug/L 50 .. 3.0 Toluene 108 -88 -3 ND ug/L 1.0 0.24 Xylenes, Total 1330 -20 -7 ND ug/L 3.0 0.63 Surrogate CASNo Result Flags Units 1ML MDL Spike %Recov LCL UCL Rerun #: Bromofluorobenzene 1072 -85 -1 90 ug/L 1.0 0.10 100 90.0 50 150 l Bromofluorobenzene(PID) 1072 -85 -1 84 ug/L 1.0 0.10 100 84.3 50 150 Difluorobenzene 540 -36 -3 44 ug/L 1.0 0.10 50 88.0 50 150 Dill uorobenzene(PID) 540 -36 -3 49 ug/L 1.0 0.10 50 97.7 50 150 Page 3 of 9 Detailed Analytical Report Workorder (SDG): A0212015 Project: Bells Flat Unit Client: Soil Processing Inc. Client Project Number: Soil Processing Report Section: Client Sample Report Client Sample Name: Analytica Alaska Inc. TB Matrix: Aqueous Collection Date: 12/4/2002 1:00:00PM The following test was conducted by: Analytica - Anchorage Lab Sample Number: A0212015-02A Analysis Date: 12/9/2002 11:02:00AM Prep Date: 12/9/2002 ' Instrument: Natasha Analytical Method ID: GRO by ADEC AKIO] & BTEX by 8021B File Name: N2120908.D Prep Method ID: 5030 Dilution Factor: 1 Prep Batch Number: A021209001 Report Basis: As Received Analyst Initials: STE Sample prep wt./vol: 5.00 mI Prep Extract Vol: 5.00 ml Analyte CASNo Result Flaes Units POL ML Rerun #: Benzene 71-43-2 ND ug/L 1.0 0.15 1 Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 ND ug/L 1.0 0.18 Gasoline Range Organics n/a ND ug/L 50 3.0 Toluene 108-88-3 ND ug/L 1.0 0.24 Xylenes, Total 1330-20-7 ND ug/L 3.0 0.63 Surrogate CASNo Result Fines Units L'91., MDL Spike Vo Recov LCL UCL Rerun #: Bromofluorobenzene 1072-85-1 92 ug/L 1.0 0.10 100 92,0 50 150 1 Bromofluorobenzene(PID) 1072-85-1 89 ug/L 1.0 0.10 100 88.6 50 150 Difluorobenzene 540-36-3 43 ug/L 1.0 0.10 . 50 85.8 50 150 Difluorobenzene(PID) 540-36-3 49 ug/L 1.0 0.10 50 98.8 50 150 Page 4 of 9 Detailed Analytical Report Workorder (SDG): A0212015 Project: Bells Flat Unit Client: Client Project Number: Report Section: Client Sample Name: Soil Processing Inc. Soil Processing Method Blank Report Analytica Alaska Inc. MB Matrix: Aqueous Collection Date: 12/6/2002 12:00:OOAM The following test was conducted by: Analytica - Anchorage Lab Sample Number: A021206005-MB Prep Date: 12/6/2002 ADEC AK102/103 - (DRO & RRO) 3510 Prep Batch Number: A021206005 • Report Basis: Dry Weight Basis Sample prep wt./vol: 1,000.00ml Analvte CASNo Result Flags Units Diesel Range Organics n./a ND mg/L Residual Range Organics nla ND mg/L Surrogate CASNo Result Flags Units o-Terphenyl 84-15-1 0.043 mg/L Squalane 111-01-3 0.051 mg/L Analytical Method ID: Prep Method ID: Analysis Date: Instrument: File Name: Dilution Factor: Analyst Initials: Prep Extract Vol: PQL MDL 0.16 0.032 0.27 0.054 12/9/2002 11:56:00AM Roo R2120958.D 1 GD 1.00 ml Rerun 1 POL MDL Spike % Recov LCL UCL Rerun 4: 0.011 0.0023 0.050 86.1 -50 150 1 0.014 0.0028 0.050 101 50 150 The following test was conducted by: Analytica - Anchorage Lab Sample Number: A021209001-MB Prep Date: 12/9/2002 Analytical Method ID: GRO by ADEC AK101 & BTEX by 8021B Prep Method ID: 5030 Prep Batch Number: A021209001 Report Basis: Dry Weight Basis Sample prep wt./vol: 5.00 ml Analvte CASNo Result Flags Units Benzene 71-43-2 ND ug/L Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 ND ug/L Gasoline Range Organics n/a ND ug/L Toluene 108-88-3 ND ug/L Xylenes, Total 1330-20-7 ND ug/L Surrogate CASNo Result Flags Units Bromofluorobenzene 1072-85-1 93 ug/L Bromofluorobenzene(PID) 1072-85-1 89 ug/L Difluorobenzene 540-36-3 43 ug/L Difluorobenzene(PID) 540-36-3 49 ug/L Analysis Date: Instrument: File Name: Dilution Factor: 12/9/2002 9:06:OOAM Natasha N2120904.D 1 Analyst Initials: STE Prep Extract Vol: 5.00 ml POL 1VID L 1.0 0.15 1.0 0.18 50 3.0 1.0 0.24 3.0 0.63 Rerun 4: PQL MDL Spike %Recov LCL UCL Rerun 4: 1.0 0.10 100 92.6 50 150 1 1.0 0.10 100 89.3 50 150 1.0 0,10 50 85.6 50 150 1.0 0.10 50 98.7 50 150 Page 5 of 9 Detailed Analytical Report Workorder (SDG): A0212015 Project: Bells Flat Unit Client: Soil Processing Inc. Client Project Number: Soil Processing Prep Batch Number: A021206005 Analytica Alaska Inc. QC Recovery Report Work Order :A0212015 Base Sample QC Sample QC Duplicate: SampieAnalysis Date: QC Sample Analysis Date: Analyte A021206005 -MB A021206005 -LCS A021206005 -LCSD 12/9/2002 11:56:OOAM 12/9/2002 12:50:OOPM Anal. Method: Sample Prep Date: Analysis Units: Matrix: ADEC AK 102/ 103 - (DRO & RRO) 12/6/2002 12:00:00AM mg/L Aqueous QC DUPSample Analysis Date: 12/9/2002 1:17:00PM Samp. Spike Sp Dup Spike Recov SpikeDup SPDUP.R LCL UCL RPD RPD FI Rec FI Result Res. Res Cone Cone EC Diesel Range Organics ND 1.66 1.63 2.00 83.0 2.00 81.5 60 120 1.82 Residual Range Organics ND 1.96 2.09 2.00 98.0 2.00 104.5 60 120 6.42 Surrogates: o- Terphenyl 0.0430 0.0434 0.0438 0.0500 86.8 0.0500 87.6 60 120 0.92 Squalane 0.0507 0.0505 0.0521 0.0500 101.0 0.0500 104.2 60 120 3,12 Prep Batch Number: A021209001 Base Sample A021209001 -MB Anal. Method: GRO by ADEC AK101 & BTEX by 8021B QC Sample A021209001 -LCS Sample Prep Date: 12/9/2002 12:00:OOAM QC Duplicate: A021209001 -LCSD Analysis Units: ug/L SampleAnalysis Date: 12/9/2002 9:06:OOAM Matrix: Aqueous QC Sample Analysis Date: 12/9/2002 9:35:OOAM QC DUPSample Analysis Date: 12/9/2002 10:04:OOAM Analyze Samp. Spike Sp Dup Spike Recov SpikeDup SPDUP.R LCL UCL RPD RPD Fl Rec FI Result Res. Res Conc Conc EC Benzene ND 13.8 13.6 13.8 100.0 13.8 98.6 60 120 1,46 Ethylbenzene ND 20.6 20.2 20.3 101.5 20.3 99.5 60 120 1.96 Gasoline Range Organics ND 912 1,010 1,100 82.9 1,100 91.8 60 120 10.20 Toluene ND 75.9 73,8 84.5 89.8 84.5 87.3 60 120 2.81 Xylenes, Total ND 92.8 90.5 99.2 93.5 99.2 . 91.2 60 120 2.51 Surrogates: Bromofluorobenzene 92.6 93.0 98.2 100 93,0 100 98,2 60 120 5.44 Bromofluorobenzene(PID) 89.3 78.7 78.6 100 78.7 100 78.6 60 120 0.13 Difluorobenzene 42.8 43.1 44.8 50.0 86.2 50.0 89.6 60 120 3.87 Difluorobenzene(PID) 49.3 46.4 " 45.4 50.0 92.8 50.0 90.8 60 120 2.18 Page 6 of 9 Detailed Analytical Report Workorder (SDG): Project: Client: Client Project Number: Prep Batch Number: A0212015 Bells Flat Unit Soil Processing Inc. Soil Processing A021209001 Analytica Alaska Inc. QC Recovery Report Work Order:A0212015 Base Sample QC Sample QC Duplicate: SampleAnalysis Date: QC Sample Analysis Date: Analyte A021209001 -MB A021209001 -LCS A021209001 -LCSD 12/9/2002 9:06:OOAM 12/9/2002 9:35:OOAM SAP. Spike Sp Dup Result Res. Res Anal. Method: Sample Prep Date: Analysis Units: Matrix: GRO by ADEC AK101 & B'1'EX by 8021B 12/9/2002 12 :00:OOAM ug/L Aqueous QC DUPSample Analysis Date: 12/9/2002 10:04:00AM Spike Recov SpikeDup SPDUP.R LCL UCL RPD RPD Fl Conc Conc EC Rec Fl FOOTNOTES TO QC REPORT Note 1: Results are shown to three significant figures to avoid rounding errors in calculations. Note 2: If the sample concentration is greater than 4 times the spike level, a recovery is not calculated, and the result should be used as a replicate. In such cases the spike is not as high as expected random measurement variability of the sample result itself. Note 3: For sample duplicates, if the result is less than the PQL, the duplicate RPD is not applicable and is shown as 0. If the sample and duplicate results are not five times the PQL or greater, then the RPD is not expected to fall within the window shown and the comparison should be made on the basis of the absolute difference. Analytica uses the criterion that the absolute difference should be less than the PQL for water or less than 2XPQL for other matrices. Page 7 of 9 Detailed Analytical Report Workorder (SDG): Project: Client: Client Project Number: Lab Project ID: A0212015 Bells Flat Unit Soil Processing Inc. Soil Processing Analytica Alaska Inc. QC BATCH ASSOCIATIONS - BY METHOD BLANK 13,870 Lab Project Number: A0212015 Lab Method Blank Id: Prep Batch ID: Method: This Method blank and SampleNum A0212015-01B A021206005 -LCS A021206005 -LCSD A021206005 -MB A021206005 ADEC AK102 /103 - (DRO & RRO) sample preparation batch are associated with the following samples, spikes, and ClientSampleName Pit 1 Pond Partic. LCS LCSD DataFile R2120959.D R2120960.D R2120961.D Prep Date: 12/6/2002 duplicates: AnalysisDate 12/9/2002 12:23:OOPM 12/9/2002 12:50:00PM 12/9/2002 1:17:OOPM Lab Method Blank Id: Prep Batch ID: Method: A021209001 -MB A021209001 GRO by ADEC AK101 & BTEX by 8021B Prep Date: 12/9/2002 This Method blank and sample preparation batch are associated with the following samples, spikes, and duplicates: AnalysisDate 12/9/2002 9:35:OOAM 12/9/2002 10:04:OOAM 12/9/2002 10:33:OOAM 12/9/2002 11:02:OOAM SampleNum A021209001 -LCS A021209001 -LCSD A0212015-01A A0212015 -02A ClientSampleName DataFile LCS LCSD Pit 1 Pond Partic. TB N2120905.D N2120906.D N2120907.D N2120908.D Page 8 of 9 Detailed Analytical Report Workorder (SDG): A0212015 Project: Bells Flat Unit Client: Soil Processing Inc. Client Project Number: Soil Processing Analytica Alaska Inc. DATA FLAGS AND DEFINITIONS The PQL is the Method Quantitation Limit as defined by USACE. Reporting Limit: Limit below which results are shown as "ND ". This may be the PQL, MDL, or a value between. See the report conventions below. Result Field: ND = Not Detected at or above the Reporting Limit NA = Analyte not applicable (see Case Narrative for discussion) Qualifier Fields: LOW = Recovery is below Lower Control Limit HIGH = Recovery , RPD, or other parameter is above Upper Control Limit E = Reported concentration is above the instrument calibration upper range Organic Analysis Flags: B = Analyte was detected in the laboratory method blank J = Analyte was detected above MDL or Reporting Limit but below the Quant Limit (PQL) Inorganic Analysis Flags: J = Analyte was detected above the Reporting Limit but below the Quant Limit (PQL) W = Post digestion spike did not meet criteria S = Reported value determined by the Method of Standard Additions (MSA) Other Flags may be applied. See Case Narrative for Description REPORTING CONVENTIONS FOR THIS REPORT TestPkgName Basis # Sig Figs Reporting Limit AK101 GRO/8021 BTEX/5030 (Aqueous) As Received 2 Report to PQL AK102/103 /3510 (Aqueous) - (DRO & RRO) As Received 2 Report to 2 x MDL, J qual below PQL Page 9 of 9 ANALYTICA ALASKA Inc. Sample Raw Data MEM AK102/103 Diesel/Residual Range Organics The Science of Analysis and The Art of Service (2.1intitation Report (QT Reviewer. , Data File : I:\DATA\ROO\1102.SEC\R2120959.D Acq On : 12-9-02 12:23:37 PM Sample A0212015-01B-SC-1-1 Misc : A021206005 IntFile : R1Q 1108.E Quant Time: Dec 9 13:43 2002 Quant Results File: 12072902.RES Via_L: 66 Operator: GD Inst : Roo Multiplr: 1.00 Quant Method : C:\HPCHEM\1...\12072902.M (Chemstation Integrator) Title : drrros Last Update Thu Dec 05 16:25:44 2002 Response via : Initial Calibration DataAcq Meth : R00_12R.M Volume Inj. Signal Phase.: Signal Info Compound R.T. Response Conc Units System Monitoring Compounds 1) s O-terphenyl 2) s Squalane 11.50 14.48 Target Compounds 3) h AK102 diesel range c10-c25 10.00 4) h residual range c25-c36end 15.00 2358085 50.083 mg/1 1980896 52.967 mg/1 5231044 122.265 mg/1 15047961 761.908 mg/1 (f)=RT Delta > 1/2 Window (m)=manual int. R2120959.D 12072902.M Mon Dec 09 15:14:11 2002 Page 1 Quantitation Report Data File : I:\DATA\ROO\t302.SEC\R2120959.D Vi.—: 66 Acq On : 12-9-02 12:23:37 PM Operator: GD Sample : A0212015-01B-SC-1-1 Inst : Roo Misc : A021206005 Multiplr: 1.00 IntFile : R1Q 1108.E Quant Time: Dec 9 13:43 2002 Quant Results File: 12072902.RES Quant Method : C:\HPCHEM\1...\12072902.M (Chemstation Integrator) Title : drrros Last Update : Thu Dec 05 16:25:44 2002 Response via : Multiple Level Calibration DataAcq Meth : R00_12R.M Volume Inj. : Signal Phase. Signal Info : I.Re:3ponse R2120959.DWID2B 320000 300000 280000 260000 240000. 220000 200000 180000 160000. 140000 120000 100000 80000 60000. 40000 20000 -20000 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 13.00 14.00 15.00 16.00 17.00 18.00 R2120959.D 12072902.M Mon Dec 09 15:14:12 2002 Page 2 ANALYTICA ALASKA Inc. Support Documentation The Science of Analysis and The Art of Service AALASKA INC. ANALYTICA www.analyticagroup.com 811 W. 8th Ave. Anchorage, AK 99501 (907) 258 -2155 FAX: (907) 258 -6634 5438 Shaune Drive Juneau, AK 99801 (907) 780 -6668 FAX: (907) 780 -6670 12189 Pennsylvania Street Thornton, CO 80241 (800) 873 -8707 FAX: (303) 469 -5254 LGN: AD212O1b Quote: Project ID #: Chain of Custody Record / Analysis Rea.uest Company Name: a/Y DP 55 161 Project Name: / ��� a5 net VOA by EPA 602 PAHby EPA 610 TAgH by EPA 610/602 BTEX by EPA 5030/8021B GRO by AK101 DRO by AK102 RRO by AK103 0 o Hold for Further Analysis co s�Company Address: /,,� #1125AL ,�• , G 4 / 7.3`1? . 7520 Report To: �!7 7 GP/ !� �� yr Invoice To: P.O. Number: Telephone: 279.- 3raoo • Fax: 7*. 2 /y • Date Collected Time Collected Matrix # Containers Email:• ewdeIOJ L� G oL., n '�" Sample ID 1 m 1-7o i4 {uric,. Wi doer Jim W Z °'r -- — I 2? X � 2. —/ CO M M�E ir er " . C ,;�� ` /i 1 Z/ Li f 0 2, 'Temp b l oyi k eta lL w (GilA—ioeI Sal 40 Q, 1 — Van e- n bi-- f C0' k_ 1100 / / 1 iaa0P74-7.ct d G /G . c %" i, )TjJAd • ,Aribl , eX--, 7�.. ' O 97))? wq�� of C� ��U7� ��� y DELIVERABLES EDD TURNAROUND Level 2 (ADEC) ❑ Level 3 ❑ Level 4 (USACE) ❑ Level 5 Dhromatograms + Report PDF ❑ COELT (V 1.2) 0 STD (Excel) ❑ 2 Business Days • ❑ 5 Business Days ❑ 10 -15 Business Days other: #Business Days RELINQUISHED BY SAMPLER: RECEIVED BY: RELINQUISHED BY RECEIVED BY: Cooler Receipt Information Signature: .'fir f 9 ����� �, i...// 3,t ��. iti.. ''anted ame: / • P ed Nal e' . A Jew) • ����L��11� 1� a. lam► 1 �— I` , VQ ■ Signature: 9 Signature: pp�� Temp Received: 6j . V °C Temp Received: °C Printed Name: Printed Name: Coolers: I Seals: l — 7F Firm: A-it, Firm: Ptik1 Firm: Firm: Courier Fee: $ Date/Time: ithl �� I n , 1 ' IOL ! 5-01° Ai Date/Time: [ 1 2't I h2- )i n Date/Time: Date/Time: � (f W Airbill # _ A. i,� /. nil . t PAGE OF Cooler Receipt Form Cent: Soil Processing Inc. Client Code: 018680 Project: Bells Flat Unit Cooler ID: 1 A. Preliminary Examination Phase: 1. Was airbill Attached? No 2. Custody Seals? Yes 3. Seals intact? Yes 4. Screened for radiation? N/A 5. COC Attached? Yes Order #: A0212015 Date cooler opened: 12/4/2002 Cooler opened by: HW Signature: Airbill #: Carrier Name: Other How many? 1 Location: lid Seal Name: if Properly Completed? Yes Signed by AEL employee? Yes 6. Project Identification from custody paper: Bells Flats 7. Preservative: BlueGel Temperature: 6.0 ek't Designated person initial here to acknowledge receipt: Date: )6 Z/ LI) COMMENTS: Temp blank not provided. Ambient cooler temp was 6.0. HW 12/4/2002 B. Loo-in Phase: Samples Log-in Date: 12/4/2002 Log-in By: HW. Signature: zuzia.)cs..„,...146.„c;:, 1. Packing Type: Bubblewrap 2. Were samples in separate bags? Yes 3. Were containers intact? Yes Labels agree with COC? Yes 4. Number of bottles received: 3 Number of samples received: 3 5. Correct containers used? Yes Correct preservatives added? Yes 6. Sufficient sample volume? Yes 7. Bubbles in VOA samples? No 8. Was Project manager called and status discussed? No 9. Was anyone called? No Who was called? By whom? Date: COMMENTS: Headspace in sample ID: Pit 1 Pond Pardo. - the lab is proceeding. Page 1 of Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report Soil Processing Kodiak Belts Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274-3000 Stockpile Number: job 4 Stkp #2 Tonnage, 500 tons Ending Treatment bate: 10 -1 -02 To 10 -6 -02 Sampled By: J. Fabian Origination of Soil: Jacobs AbA, cell 11 This report outlines the findings of third party sampling as permitted by Paul Horwath, P.E. of ADEC. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for the treated soil stockpile as directed by the Qperationa plan. The aamplo locations were accessed 'wing a sheval and ware hand dug into the stockpile nt the top, middle and tho baao, Tho oample° were field cw waned with a Phttsv' " wil9n mf+or uoulilly Jur 1p. OII. uliuly IiL.ul .umplu nrau vvllsetad from tho lvvstisn showing the highest PTO reading. The cooler'-was shipped to Analytica of Anchorage Alaska (ADEC Certification UST -014). Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is.attoched. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been Completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each 'successive 500 tons. The 500 -ton stockpiles will be separated into 3 individual stockpiles, which aid in sampling and will carry the same number. i•.d90:2O ?OW ET 'V30 TO224 -G9 : 'Ohl X1 Er41tg.^1Dr_,.Ad s^i t PrOCeS5it19 Sample Collection: FX mo. : 654-3301 Oct. 14 2002 8: 4Ei Sample Screening _ 5:1 Ana1yUc1 Sample Tirn Time Lab ID SPI 4-2 1-1 SPI 4-2 1.2 5.9 0.013 P .010 SPI 4-2 1-3 5.6 SPI 4-2 2-1 6.9 SPI 4-2 2-2 6.3 . .. SPI 4-1 -3 6.0 SPI 4-2 3-1 7.3 --, SPI 4-2 3-2 S.1 Yes 950 am A0210043-01 SPI 4-2 3-3 6.5 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed far GRO, DRO and KO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from Analytica and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non-detect results are Indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. SaxnplelD Location D1O (100 mg/kg) GRO (50 mg/kg) RRO (2000mg/kg 260 PQL8,5 SP14-2-2 12 PQL 4,3 ND PQL 2.2 0.011 PQL0.010 ND QL0.010 0.013 P .010 SamplelD Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg ) EthyI Benzene (5 Ing4g) Toluene (4.8 ingItg) X)'lene (69 ingikg) 0.024 PQL c, SPI 4-2 3-2 0.011 PQL0.010 ND QL0.010 0.013 P .010 . .. Sample nomenclature; Example; SPI 15-2-3 SPI - for Soil Processing, 15 - for the stockpile number, 2 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 3 - for sample location in that specific pile. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings; Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results from Analytica. Job 4 Stockpile #2 meets ADEC cleanup levels and is ready for review and removal. Jeannie Fabian Alaska Test-Lab Kodiak Alaska d Vide° :20 ELB E Zti "1-00 te2 --t'G9 : '011 ,hd ButSoo..id Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274 -3000 Stockpile Number: Job 4, Stkp #3 Tonnage: 500 Tons Ending Treatment Date: 10 -12 -02 Sampled By: J. Fabiano Origination of Soil: Jacobs, ADA This report outlines the findings of third party sampling as permitted by Paul Horwath, P.E. of ADEC. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for the treated soil stockpile as directed by the Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. The samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. One analytical sample was collected from the location showing the highest PID reading. The cooler was shipped to Anayytica of Anchorage Alaska (ADEC Certification UST -014). Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. After the first three test stockpiles ( 50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. The 500 -ton stockpiles will be separated into 3 individual stockpiles, which aid in sampling and will carry the same number. Sample Collection: Sample PID Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI 4-4 1-1 1.0 ND PQL 0.011 0.017 PQL 0.011 0.023 PQL 0.022 SPI 4-4 1-2 0.2 SPI 4-4 1-3 0.2 SPI 4-4 2-1 2.6 SPI 4-4 2-2 0.9 SPI 4-4 2-3 0.7 SPI 4-4 3-1 1.8 SPI 4-4 3-2 2.1 SPI 4-4 3-3 4.4 Yes 955 am A0210090-01 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, DRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from Analytica and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non-detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location DRO (100 mg/kg) GRO (50 mg/kg) RRO (2000mg/kg) 45 PQL 9.1 SPI (02) 4-3 3-3 ND PQL 4.6 ND PQL 2.4 ND PQL 0.011 0.017 PQL 0.011 0.023 PQL 0.022 Volatile Results Sample ID Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) Xylene (69 mg/kg) SPI (02) 4-3 3-3 0.016 PQL 0.011 ND PQL 0.011 0.017 PQL 0.011 0.023 PQL 0.022 2 Sample nomenclature: Example: 5P1 15-2-3 SRI - for Soil Processing, 15 - for the stockpile number, 2 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 3 - for sample location in that specific pile. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirma.tory analytical results from Analytica. Job 4 Stockpile #3 meets ADEC cleanup levels. Jeannie Fabiano Alaska Test Lab Kodiak Alaska 3 Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274 -3000 Stockpile Number: (02) 02 -1,2,3 Tonnage: 402.37 (04)1 ;,, • Ending Treatment bate: 9 -20 -02 Sampled By: J. Fabiano Origination of Soil: Loran Stu, Narrow Cape Contractor: CCI This report outlines the findings of third party sampling as permitted by Paul Horwath, P.E. of ADEC. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for each treated soil stockpile as directed by the Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. The samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. One analytical sample was collected from the location showing the highest PID reading. The cooler was shipped to Analytica of Anchorage Alaska (ADEC Certification UST -014). Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. After the - first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. The 500 -ton stockpiles will be separated into 3 individual stockpiles, which aid in sampling and will carry the same number. Sample Collection: Sample PID Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI 02-3-1-1 6.3 27 PQL 8.3 ND PQL 0.0097 ND PQL 0.019 SPI 02-3-1-2 7.2 SPI 02-3-1-3 8.1 SPI 02-3-2-1 8.6 SPI 02-3-2-2 8.9 SPI 02-3-2-3 9.2 SPI 02-3-3-1 12.1 Yes 1245 A0209102-02A SPI 02-3-3-2 10.2 . SPI 02-3-3-3 9.4 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, DRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from Analytica and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non-detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location DRO (100 mg/kg) GRO (50 mg/kg) RRO (2000mg/kg) SPI 02-3-1 9.4 PQL 4.1 ND PQL 2.1 27 PQL 8.3 ND PQL 0.0097 ND PQL 0.019 Volatile Results Sample ID Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) Xylene (69 mg/kg) SPI 02-3-1 ND PQL 0.0097 ND PQL 0.0097 ND PQL 0.0097 ND PQL 0.019 2 Sample nomenclature: Example; 5PI0215 -2 -3 SPI - for Soil Processing, 02 - for the year, 15 - for the stockpile number, 2 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 3 - for sample location in that specific pile. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results from Analytica. Stockpiles 1,2 &3 of Job #02 meet AbEC Cleanup Levels. Soils are from Narrow Cape Loran Sta, provided to SPI by CCI. Jeannie Fabiano Alaska TestLab Kodiak Alaska 3 (,J Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274 -3000 Stockpile Number: 1 Tonnage: 50 tons Ending Treatment Date: August 31, 2002 at 11 :30 AM Sampled By: J: Fabiano Origination of Soil: Buskin Beach, CeII 10 Jacobs Sub- contract # 05.M30528 This report outlines the findings of third party sampling as permitted by Paul Horwath, P.E. of ADEC. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for the treated soil stockpile as directed by the Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. The samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. One analytical sample was collected from the location showing the highest PID reading. The cooler was shipped to Analytica of Anchorage Alaska (ADEC Certification UST -014). Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy, of which is attached. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. The 500 -ton stockpiles will be separated into 3 individual stockpiles, which aid in sampling and will carry the some number. Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274 -3000 Stockpile Number: Stockpile # 2 & 3 Tonnage: #2 (75 tons) and #3 (100 tons) Ending Treatment Date: #2 9 -1 -02 and #3 9 -4 -02 Sampled By: J Fabiano Origination of Soil: Buskin Beach CeII #10 Jacobs Sub contract # 05.M305.28 This report outlines the findings of third party sampling as permitted by Paul Horwath, P.E. of ADEC. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for the treated soil stockpile as directed by the Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. The samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. One analytical sample was collected from the location showing the highest PID reading. The cooler was shipped to Analytica of Anchorage- Alaska (ADEC Certification UST -014). Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will /be taken for each successive 500 tons. The 500 -ton stockpiles will be separated into 3 individual stockpiles, which aid in sampling and will carry the same number. Sample nomenclature: Example: SP' 15-2-3 SPI - for Soil Processing, 15 - for the stockpile number, 2 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, .3 - for sample location in that specific pile. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results from Analytica. Stockpile #1 (50 Tons) meets ADEC Cleanup Levels and may be moved. Jeannie Fabiano Alaska TestLab Kodiak Alaska Sample Collection: Sample PID Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI 1 -1 16.1 38 ND PQL 0.0093 ND PQL 0.019 SPI 1 -2 17.7 SPI 1 -3 18.4 yes 110 pm A0209012 -01 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, DRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from Analytica and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non - detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location DRO (100 mg/kg) GRO (50 mg/kg) RRO (2000mg/kg) SPI 1 -3 35 ND PQL 2.0 38 ND PQL 0.0093 ND PQL 0.019 Volatile Results Sample ID Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) Xylem (69 mg/kg) SPI 1 -3 0.011 ND PQL 0.0093 ND PQL 0.0093 ND PQL 0.019 2 Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274 -3000 Stockpile Number: Stockpile #4 Tonnage: 500 tons Ending Treatment Date:9 -13 -02 Sampled By: J. Fabiano Origination of Soil: Buskin Beach CeII 10 Jacobs Sub contract # 05.M305.28 This report outlines the findings of third party sampling as permitted by Paul Horwath, P.E. of ADEC. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for the treated soil stockpile as directed by the Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. The samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. One analytical sample was collected from the location showing the highest PID reading. The cooler was shipped to Analytica of Anchorage Alaska (ADEC Certification UST -014). Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. The 500 -ton stockpiles will be separated into 3 individual stockpiles, which aid in sampling and will carry the same number. 1 Sample nomenclature: Example: SPI 15-2-3 SPI - for Soil Processing, 15 - for the stockpile number, 2 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 3 - for sample location in that specific pile. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. • Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results from Analytica. Stockpile 2 & 3 meet AbEC cleanup levels and can be moved. Jeannie Fabiano Alaska Test Lab Kodiak Alaska 3 Sample Collection: Sample PID Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI 2 -1 14.9 Yes 10:35 am A0209022 -01 SPI 2 -2 12.8 ND PQL 0.012 ND PQL 0.012 ND PQL 0.024 SPI 2 -3 14.1 SPI 3 -1 14.7 Yes 7:05 pm A0209022 -02 SPI 3 -2 11.9 SPI 3 -3 10.6 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, DRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following, results were obtained from Analytica and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non - detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location DRO (100 mg/kg) GRO (50 mg/kg) RRO (2000mg/kg) SPI 2 -1 18 ND PQL 2.4 26 SPI 3 -1 17 ND PQL 2.6 21 ND PQL 0.012 ND PQL 0.012 ND PQL 0.024 Volatile Results Sample ID Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mgfkg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) Xylene (69 mg/kg) SPI 2 -1 ND PQL 0.011 ND PQL 0.011 ND PQL 0:011 ND PQL 0.022 SPI 3 -1 ND PQL 0.012 ND PQL 0.012 ND PQL 0.012 ND PQL 0.024 Sample nomenclature: Example: SP' 15-2-3 SPI - for Soil Processing, 15 - for the stockpile number, 2 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 3 - for sample location in that specific pile. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results from Analytica. Stockpile #4 Meets ADEC cleanup levels and can be moved. Jeannie Fabiano Alaska TestLab Kodiak Alaska 3 Sample Collection: Sample PID Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI -1 -1 13.0 yes 10:00 am A0209055 -01 SPI -1 -2 13.0 SPI -1 -3 12.3 SPI -2 -1 9.6 SPI -2 -2 10.0 SPI -2 -3 10.1 SPI -3 -1 10.6 SPI -3 -2 10.3 SPI -3 -3 10.7 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, DRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, ds well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from Analytica and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non - detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location DRO (100 mg/kg) GRO (50 mg/kg) RRO (2000mg/kg) SPI -4 -1 10 ND PQL 2.0 30 ND PQL 0.0092 ND PQL 0.018 Volatile Results Sample ID Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) Xylene (69 mg/kg) SPI -4 -1 ND PQL 0.0092 ND PQL 0.0092 ND PQL 0.0092 ND PQL 0.018 2 Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility - 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274 -3000 Stockpile Number: Stockpile #4 Tonnage: 500 tons Ending Treatment bate:9 -13 -02 Sampled By: J. Fabian() Origination of Soil: Buskin Beach CeII 10 Jacobs Sub contract # 05.M3 05.28 This report outlines the findings of third party sampling as permitted by Paul Horwath, P.E. of ADEC." Three Field Screening Samples were collected for the treated soil stockpile as directed by the Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. The samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. One analytical sample was collected from the location showing the highest PID reading. The cooler was shipped to Analytica of Anchorage Alaska (AbEC Certification UST -014): Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken f9 each successive 500 tons. The 500 -ton stockpiles will be`separated into.3 individual stockpiles, which aid in sampling and will carry the same number. 1 Sample Collection: Sample PID Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI -1 -1- 13.0 yes 10:00 am A0209055 -01 SPI -1 -2 13.0 SPI -1 -3 12.3 SPI -2 -1 9.6 SPI -2 -2 10.0 SPI -2 -3 10.1 SPI -3 -1 10.6 SPI -3 -2 10.3 SPI -3 -3 10.7 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, DRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following,res,ults were obtained from Analytica and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non- detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID ' Location DRO - (100 mg/kg) GRO.` (50 mg/kg). RRO (2000mg/kg) 30 SPI -4 -1 10 ND PQL 2.0 ND 'PQL 0.0092 ND PQL 0.0092 ND PQL 0.018 Volatile Results Sample ID Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene. (4.8'mg/kg) Xylene (69 mg/kg) SPI -4 -1 ND PQL 0.0092 ND 'PQL 0.0092 ND PQL 0.0092 ND PQL 0.018 If 2 Sample nomenclature: Example: SPI 15-2-3 SPI - for Soil Processing, 15 - for the stockpile number, 2 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 3 - for sample location in that specific pile. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results from Analytica. Stockpile #4 Meets AbEC cleanup levels and can be moved. Jeannie Fabiano Alaska TestLab Kodiak Alaska. 3 Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274-3000 Stockpile Number: Job 4 Stkp #4 Tonnage: 500 Tons Ending Treatment Date: 10-14-02 To 10-21-02 Sampled By: J. Fabiano Origination of Soil: Jacobs ADA, Cell 9 This report outlines the findings of third party sampling as permitted by Paul Horwath, P.E. of ADEC. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for the treated soil stockpile as directed by the Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. The samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. One analytical sample was collected from the location showing the highest PID reading. The cooler was shipped to Analytica of Anchorage Alaska (ADEC Certification UST-014). Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. After the first three test stockpiles ( 50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. The 500-ton stockpiles will be separated into 3 individual stockpiles, which aid in sampling and will carry the same number. Sample Collection: Sample PID Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI (02) 4 -4 1 -1 9.0 ND PQL 0.0086 ND PQL 0.0086 ND PQL 0.017 SPI (02) 4 -4 1 -2 11.6 Yes 1010 A0210134 -02 SPI (02) 4 -4 1 -3 10.1 SPI (02) 4 -4 2 -1 9.5 SPI (02) 4 -4 2 -2 8.7 SPI (02) 4 -4 2 -3 8.2 SPI (02) 4-4 3 -1 7.8 SPI (02) 4 -4 3 -2 7.5 SPI (02) 4 -4 3 -3 7.5 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, DRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from Analytica and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non- detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location DRO (100 mg/kg) GRO (50 mg/kg) RRO (2000mg/kg) 130 PQL 9.0 SPI (02) 4 -4 1 -2 12 PQL 4.5 ND PQL 1.9 ND PQL 0.0086 ND PQL 0.0086 ND PQL 0.017 1 Sample ID Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) Xylene (69 mg/kg) SPI (02) 4 -4 1 -2 ND PQL 0.0086 ND PQL 0.0086 ND PQL 0.0086 ND PQL 0.017 2 Sample nomenclature: Example: SPI 15-2-3 SPI - for Soil Processing, 15 - for the stockpile number, 2 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 3 - for sample location in that specific pile. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results from Analytica. Job 4 Stkp #4 meets AbEC cleanup levels and is ready for review and removal. Jeannie Fabiano Alaska TestLab Kodiak Alaska 3 Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274 -3000 Stockpile Number: Job #4 Stkp #5 Tonnage: 500 Ending Treatment Date: 10 -23 To 10 -27 Sampled By: J. Fabiano Origination of Soil: Jacob's ADA Cell 9 This report outlines the findings of third party sampling as permitted by Paul Horwath, P.E. of ADEC. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for the treated soil stockpile as directed by the Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. The samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. One analytical sample was collected from the location showing the highest PID reading. The cooler was shipped to Analytica of Anchorage Alaska (ADEC Certification UST -014). Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. The 500 -ton stockpiles will be separated into 3 individual stockpiles, which aid in sampling and will carry the same number. Sample Collection: Sample PID Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI (02) 4 -5 1 -1 6.3 110 PQL 9.0 0.010 PQL 0.0081 ND PQL 0.016 SPI (02) 4-5 1 -2 9.1 SPI (02) 4 -5 1 -3 9.0 SPI (02) 4 -5 2 -1 8.9 SPI (02) 4 -5 2 -2 6.9 SPI (02) 4 -5 2 -3 6.8 SPI (02) 4-5 3 -1 9.3 Yes 130 PM A0210170 -01 SPI (02) 4 -5 3 -2 8.5 SPI (02) 4 -5 3 -3 3.8 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, DRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from Analytica and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non - detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location DRO (100 mg/kg) GRO (50 mg/kg) RRO (2000mg/kg) SPI (02) 4 -5 3 -1 9.6 PQL 4.5 ND .PQL 1.8 110 PQL 9.0 0.010 PQL 0.0081 ND PQL 0.016 Volatile Results Sample ID Location Benzene (.0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) Xylene (69 mg/kg) SPI (02) 4 -5 3 -1 0.011 PQL 0.0081 ND PQL 0.0081 0.010 PQL 0.0081 ND PQL 0.016 2 Sample nomenclature: Example: SPI 15-2-3 SPI - for Soil Processing, 15 - for the stockpile number, 2 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 3 - for sample location in that specific pile. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results. from Analytica. Job #4 Stockpile #5 meets ADEC cleanup levels and is ready for review and removal at AbEC's direction. Jeannie Fabiano Alaska TestLab Kodiak Alaska 3 Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E, Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274 -3000 Stockpile Number: Job #4, Stockpile #6 Tonnage: 500 Ending Treatment Date: 11 -07 -02 7:30 PM Sampled By: J. Fabiano Origination of Soil: Jacobs ADA Cell 9 Jacobs Sub contract # 05.M305.28Page 1 of 2. This report outlines the findings of third party sampling as permitted by Paul Horwath, P.E. of ADEC. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for the treated soil stockpile as directed by the Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. The samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. One analytical sample was collected from the location showing the highest PID reading. The cooler was shipped to Analytica of Anchorage Alaska (AbEC Certification UST -014). Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. After the first three test stockpiles ( 50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. The 500 -ton stockpiles' will be separated into 3 individual stockpiles, which aid in sampling and will carry the same number;. Sample Collection: Sample PID Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI 4 -6 1-1 4.0 .ND PQL 0.0093 0.011 PQL 0.0093. ND PQL 0.019 SPI 4 -6 1 -2 I.5 SPI 4 -6 1 -3 3.8 SPI 4 -6 2 -1 3.8 SPI 4 -6 2 -2 2.3 SPI 4 -6 2 -3 6.4 SPI 4 -6 3 -1 6.5 SPI 4 -6 3 -2 7.1 Yes 11:30 A0211077 SPI 4 -6 3 -3 7.0 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, DRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from Analytica and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non- detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location DRO (100 mg/kg) GRO (50 mg/kg) RRO (2000mg/kg) 1000 PQL 92 SPI 4 -6 3 -2 64 PQL 46 ND PQL 2.0 .ND PQL 0.0093 0.011 PQL 0.0093. ND PQL 0.019 Volatile Results Sample ID Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) Xylene (69 mg/kg) SPI 4 -6 3 -2 ND PQL 0.0093 .ND PQL 0.0093 0.011 PQL 0.0093. ND PQL 0.019 Sample nomenclature: Example; 5P1 15-2-3 SPI - for Soil Processing, 15 - for the stockpile number, 2 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 3 - for sample location in that specific pile. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings; Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results from Analytica. Stockpile #6 of Job 4 meets AbEC cleanup levels and is ready for review by Jeff Brownlee. Jeannie Fabiano Alaska TestLab Kodiak Alaska 3 Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Fac ty 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274 -3000 Stockpile. Number: Job 4 Stkp #7, 3 -3R and 7 -3 -1 Retest for DRO and RRO. Tonnage: 500 Ending Treatment Date: 12 -3 -02 6:15 PM Sampled By: J. Fabiano Origination of Soil: Jacobs ADA, CeII 9 This report outlines the findings of third party sampling as permitted by Paul Horwath, P.E. of ADEC. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for the treated soil stockpile as directed by the Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. The samples were field screened . with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. One analytical sample was collected from the location showing the highest PID reading. The cooler was shipped to Analytica of Anchorage Alaska (ADEC Certification UST -014). Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. The 500-ton stockpiles will be separated into 3 individual stockpiles, which aid in sampling and will carry the same number. Subj: RE: Report and Results for 4-7 3-3 R and 4-9 1-1 and 5-1 Date: 12/10/02 9:52:20 AM Alaskan Standard Time From: Jeff Brownlee@envircon.state.ak.us To: jfabiano@gcimet, SPIAlaska@aol.com, Jeff Brownlee@envircon.state.ak.us, Peter.Hannon@Jacobs.com Sent from the Internet (Details) Results look acceptable for the retest. The 110 mg/kg DRO result is slightly over the cleanup level, but if we apply the upper confidence limit calculation for the sample set of previously sampled stockpiles, the result falls within an acceptable range. If you have any questions, call me at 269-3053. Jeff Original Message— From: Jeannie Fabiano [mailtolabiano@gdnet] Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 10:18 AM To: George Cline (E-mail); Jeff Brownlee (E-mail) Subject: Report and Results for 4-7 3-3 R and 4-9 1-1 and 5-1 Jeff and Jennie, George is anxious to get out Dodge so I am trying to help by getting these reports out to you all ASAP. You find the report and results for the retest of 7-3-1 with the silica gel cleanup and Stkp 4-9 as well as the small job they completed for Kodiak Oil Sales labeled 5-1. I hope this meets with your approval, Jeannie Tuesday, December 10, 2002 America Online: SPIALASKA Page 1 of 1 Sample Collection: Sample PID Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI (02)7 -3 -1 1.8 yes 306 PM A0212012 -01 SPI (02)7 -3 -2 1.7 SPI (02)7 -3 -3 1.5 SPI (02)4 -7 3 -3R no yes 840 PM A0212012 -02 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, DRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from Analytica and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non- detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results With silica Gel Cleanu Sample ID Location DRO (100 mg/kg) GRO. (50 mg/kg) RRO (2000mg/kg) 840 PQL 9.3 SPI (02)7 -3 -1 110 PQL 4.6 SPI (02)4 -7 3 -3R ND PQL 4.5 50 PQL 9.0 Volatile Results Sample ID Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) Xylene (69 mg/kg) 2 Sample nomenclature: Example: SPI 15-2-3 SPI - for Soil Processing, 15 - for the stockpile number, 2 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 3 - for sample location in that specific pile. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results from Analytica. Job 4 Stkp #7 3 -1R does not meet ADEC cleanup levels for MO at 110 ppm. This report is ready for review by Jeff Brownlee. The reburned portion of 4 -7 3 -3 meets AMC cleanup levels as outlined in Jeannie Fabiano Alaska TestLab Kodiak Alaska 3 Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274 -3000 Stockpile Number: Job 4 Stockpile #8 Tonnage: 500 Ending Treatment Date: 12 -1 -02 @ 11:45 am Sampled By: J. Fabiano Origination of Soil: Jacobs ADA CeII 9 This report outlines the findings of third party sampling as permitted by Paul Horwath, P.E. of ADEC. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for the treated soil stockpile as directed by the. Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. The samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. One analytical sample was collected from the location showing the highest PID reading. The cooler was shipped to Analytica of Anchorage Alaska (ADEC Certification UST -014). Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. After the first three test stockpiles ( 50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. The 500 -ton stockpiles will be separated into 3 individual stockpiles, which aid in sampling and will carry the same number. 1 Sample Collection: Sample PID Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI (02) 4 -8 1 -1 4.6 480 PQL 44 0.0095 PQL 0.0092 0.019 PQL 0.018 SPI (02) 4-8 1 -2 4.6 SPI (02) 4-8 1 -3 5.1 SPI (02) 4 -8 2 -1 6.0 SPI (02) 4 -8 2 -2 6.7 SPI (02) 4 -8 2 -3 7.4 SPI (02) 4 -8 3 -1 7.7 SPI (02) 4 -8 3 -2 9.1 SPI (02) 4 -8 3 -3 9.6 Yes 10:45 AM A0212005 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for. GRO, DRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 8021B. The following results were obtained from Analytica and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non - detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location DRO (100 mg/kg) GRO (50 mg/kg) RP,O (2000mg/kg) SPI (02) 4-8 3 -3 32 PQL 22 ND PQL 2.0 480 PQL 44 0.0095 PQL 0.0092 0.019 PQL 0.018 Volatile Results Sample ID Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) Xylene (69 mg/kg) SPI (02) 4 -8 3 -3 ND PQL 0.0092 ND PQL 0.0092 0.0095 PQL 0.0092 0.019 PQL 0.018 2 Sample nomenclature: Example: SPI 15-2-3 SPI - for Soil Processing, 15 - for the stockpile number, 2 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 3 - for sample location in that specific pile. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined results from Analytica. h the confirmatory analytical Stockpile #8 of Job 4 meets AbEC cleanup levels and is ready for review and removal as per Jeff Brownlee. Jeannie Fabiano Alaska TestLab Kodiak Alaska Post Treatment Sampling and Analysis Report Soil Processing Kodiak Bells Flats Category C Facility 207 E. Northern Light #103A Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 274 -3000 Stockpile Number: Job 4 Stkp #9 Tohnage: 245Tons Ending Treatment Date: 9PM 12 -4 -02 Sampled By: J. Fabiano Origination of Soil: Jacobs ADA CeII 9 This report outlines the findings of third party sampling as permitted by Paul Horwath, P.E. of ADEC. Three Field Screening Samples were collected for the treated soil stockpile as directed by the Operations plan. The sample locations were accessed using a shovel and were hand dug into the stockpile at the top, middle and the base. The samples were field screened with a Photovac 20/20 after cooling sufficiently. One analytical sample was collected from the location showing the highest PID reading. The cooler was shipped to Analytica of Anchorage Alaska (ADEC Certification UST -014). Samples were shipped under Chain of Custody, a copy of which is attached. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. The 500 -ton stockpiles will be separated into 3 individual stockpiles, which aid in sampling and will carry the same number. 1 Sample Collection: Sample PID Screening Analytical Sample Time Lab ID SPI (02) 4 -9 1 -1 . 11.7 Yes 11:12 AM A0212019 -01 SPI (02) 4-9 1 -2 5.6 SPI (02) 4-9 1 -3 4.7 SPI (02) 4 -9 2 -1 4.2 SPI (02) 4-9 2 -2 4.3 Analytical Results: Samples were analyzed for GRO, DRO and RRO per AK methods 101,102 and 103, as well as BTEX by EPA method 80219. The following results were obtained from Analytica and were compared to the required cleanup level. Non- detect results are indicated by ND and are below the PQL indicated. Petroleum Results Sample ID Location DRO (100 mg/kg) GRO. (50 mg/kg) RRO (2000mg/kg) 190 PQL 2.6 SPI (02) 4 -9 1 -1 10 PL 8.6 ND PQL 1.8 ND PQL 0.0080 0.0090 PQL 0.0080 0.017 PQL 0.016 Volatile Results Sample ID Location Benzene (0.02 mg/kg) Ethyl Benzene (5 mg/kg) Toluene (4.8 mg/kg) . Xylene (69 mg/kg) SPI (02) 4 -9 1 -1 ND PQL 0.0080 ND PQL 0.0080 0.0090 PQL 0.0080 0.017 PQL 0.016 2 Sample nomenclature: Example: SPI 15-2-3 SPI - for Soil Processing, 15 - for the stockpile number, 2 - for which one of the three piles that comprise 500 tons, 3 - for sample location in that specific pile. Treated Stockpiles are numbered sequentially. After the first three test stockpiles (50, 75 and 100 tons) have been completed and tested successfully, one analytical sample will be taken for each successive 500 tons. 500 tons is considered one stockpile. Findings: Field screening and field tests combined with the confirmatory analytical results from Analytica. Job 4 Stkp #9 meets AbEC cleanup levels and ready for review by Jeff Brownlee. Jeannie Fabian Alaska TestLab Kodiak Alaska ( -- 07/19/2002 14:45 FAX 907 26L_,J49 ADEC ANCHORAGE State of Alaska Dept of Environmental Conservation Division of Spill Prevention and Response Contaminated Sites Program. 555 Cordova Street Anchorage, AK 99501-2617 2001/005 To 1`,... ozPre..i.Vvervc A From , .4 il• a ao i - CO • • , 4 I/ _ Pfd ..a, Date . J. Phone No. Phone No. 9 7-269- Fax No. .... .6 Fax No. 907-269-7649 Number of 'apes includin . cove sheet: CO/vfilENTS: . . 07/19/2002 14:47 FAX 907 28_. ,J49 ADEC ANCHORAGE Tj 17\ ul i h a i t:I , c 1 r i 11/7 178\ 1 r',1 DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION =r DIVISION OF SPILL PREVENTION AND RESPONSE / CONTAMINATED SITES PROGRAM ,•-' July 19, 2002 RE: Soil Processing Inc_ Bells Flats, Kodiak, Alaska To Whom It May Concern: V1005/005 TONY KNOWLES, GOVERNOR 555 Cordova Street Anchorage, AK 99501 PI ION E: (907) 269 -7566 FAX: (907) 269 -7649 Intp://www.state,ak.usidec/hoine.hun The Department of Environmental Conservation, Contaminated Sites Program, has reviewed an operations plan submitted by Soil Processing Inc. to treat petroleum contaminated soil at a location described as the l3reehan Industrial Site, Tract A, Block 3, Bells Flats Alaska Subdivision. Based on the information presented in the applicant's operations plan and in accordance with 18 AAC 75.365 and 18 AAC 78.273, the operations plan is conditionally approved to operate at this location subject to the terns and conditions of the Department's July 19, 2002 approval letter. We recognize the concerns expressed by the local residents in the area regarding this facility and have considered the comments submitted either verbally at the public meeting or those submitted via email and telephone. However, many of the issues raised were related to local zoning and safety rules that are not governed by the Department. These are matters that should be addressed through the Iocal planning and zoning laws. The other issues related to possible environmental impacts from the facility were considered and incorporated as conditions in the approval letter. Also, as a condition of the operations plan approval, the Department has only authorized the facility to operate for a one year period of time (versus three years normally associated with this type of facility). This will allow us to review the facility operations during this time and evaluate their compliance with state laws and regulations. Please be informed that the decision to approve of the operations plan is subject to the administrative appeals procedures under 18 AAC 15.200 - .920. This process allows an aggrieved person to request an informal review within fifteen (15) days from receipt of the decision or a formal adjudicatory hearing within thirty (30) days from receipt of the decision. The Department's approval letter outlines the process and time frames subject to the appeal regulations. If you have any questions or wish to contact me regarding this matter, please call (907)269 -7658 or email at iim frechione@envircon.state.ak.us. Sincerely, Jim Frechione Contaminated Sites Section Manager FROM :SOILPRO FAX NO :9072749295 Jul. 16 2002 11:55AM P1 SOIL. PROCESSING INC. 207 E. NORTHERN LIGHTS BLVD., SLATE 103A ANCHORAGE, AK 99503 FAX TRANSMITTAL LETTER DATE: TIME ( FROM: CONFIRM RECEIPT: Telephone (907) 274-3000 Fax (907) 274-9295 YES NO ■••■■■11111■1161.1■■■■■■■■■■,11■11M■■........■■■■■1.......... TRANSIvirrTiNG PAGES INCLUNDING COVER LETTER, REMARKS FROM :SOILPRO F-POM : KFD -JuIy 14'20CM FRX NO. :9072749295 Jul. 16 2002 11:55RM P2 r:zix NO. : 9074858046 Jul. 12 2002 02:34PM P2 KNiiiik Fire Wpattiticut 21Y Lower Mill Ray Kodiak, AK (Oki 15 Soil Processing Inc', Anchorage, AK 99615 Dear Sir; In reviewing the information presented during our meeting the Kodiak Fire Marshal office has approved the procedure plan in dealing with the transfer of propane and the use of the soil burner located in the Bells Flat area An inspection will be required once all propane systems are in place and prior to :Sincg• • *" ...." ew Fiii3 Marshal • • !:.. •1,40••1••■11. gyp p•14.1 Vaajg1'Oj1V01MW1V1fVr'1t111.IIIIIMIMMMIIIIIWWSVY111Wlt,°Wnet1VA't. ..?1,,,,t ' 4414#411416LIA/W,-1,10/ • •[rt 14 13006 LOT B , LOT 5 LOT 9 12792 LOT 10 12740 •-• 11879 1~1.11141414 Wir• allattst losmatototo •11.0Vi1t1,1W1-,: '41*If i41stiti• V.191111140M1,114,011111401041/%506110011^14•4 1,-„t • Lt- • • • 4,,,,t,W4001/1111113,&to1AZ:Wai,1101Y041,11,MOVAOMIA114111114V:11tatt1MORAVAV. ',14,111111414010/6&110/1., • *.1411110411100011W-t•1`.'2,k4AAWkiettOMmikki0,110,4011#1.,OWONAWKIO11,f141,a11.01,04141,10W1111ANIArry 4 115 7D-1A U. S. COAST GUARD '?A-1 1 -8-1 02 .11010 I 17968 • AA539 108 / 1143 1 11D-1 TRACT B - 5A 2 !Lj TR C 6iR I r ?A --' 1 I! II' .7- 2D / , 2C / ir) 2A 1571/1; 6y5:. 0/4; A I/ / / /15C1/,,01 / 15D KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH 12C-1 14A-1 PORTION OF LOT 1 USS 2539 17B- 2 14D-1 LOT 1 USS 2539 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ZONING MAP BELLS FLATS, RUSSIAN CREEK SUBDIVISIONS & PORTIONS OF USS 2539 PREPARED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT rtci o id) 200 300 400 500 November 2001 1000 2000 NUS 0 0 11754 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH 11012 70954 14E-2 09 io L ", 0826 FATS 10939 / / / KONIAG INC, 11111•111MVPOWV11114,1'1t,. 41460411111.1*.ON: 1aCC"..111,' *11,A001*Okr.:141. (1 ..441."411111a411 —""1111111117%tiLlamita,.. KONIAG INC. (17 g • • ONING LEGEND (NU) NATURAL USE (C) CONSERVATION (PL) PUBLIC USE LAND (RR1) RURAL RESIDENTIAL 1 (B) BUSINESS (I) INDUSTRIAL V11PM,•ifta■lltV1/M1N011YWWOIM• 'WNW • MAO 011,14,-*022,601M212,•,• A22.1202eMirder0111240222112126~21440,1A1114M022214