Loading...
KILLARNEY HILLS BK 1 LT 8A - VarianceKODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH Community Development 710 MiII Bay Road (Room 204), Kodiak, Alaska 99615-6340 - Phone: (907) 486 -5736, extension 255 or 254 ZONING COMPLIANCE PERMIT Permit #: VP CZ- 9 t -- 001 1. 2. 3. Property Owner /Applicant: 2055a wrX 6.4.4%,‘,N. Number and size of parking spaces required (onsite identification of parking space is required - Yes: No: X S: IM.uv- W Mauling Address: a. Phone: I. 6,,-(12 n y�e 2 b uta-41" �¢ - Legal Description: 14- le. c,,r - �t. lOb �r..uo V Off-street baiing�M /U /8-- i / : Fs 1� Street Address: pZ l IY MAN' 1� `4. Tax Code #. 1 I Plat related requirements (e.g., plat notes, easements, subdivision conditions, eta): 1114-- Description of Existing Pro erty /currentning: 23 - IMkiI,i -J %(x Minimum Required Lot Area: rj ■) S, • 'X". Width: 62 0 Other requirements (e.g., zero lot line, additional setbacks, projections into yards, screening, etc.): / u /4-- Actual Lot Area: 1./ 28.3 si • . Width: q cJ . Minimum Required Setbacks: Sides: 5 a''e_o.-4— Front: `a 'Ce-a-k w ' I Rear: (2 led- (. LI (/ - - `�0-Oi 1, metal Management Program Applicable Polices (check appropriate category) - Residential: x Business: Maxinum Building Height: 3 S / Industrial: Other (list): 12`-is( S' /14 Use and sine of existing structures on the lot: I�%�.. �"' / `(-�(� . Is the proposed action consistent with the KB Coastal Management Program? - Yes: No: If the proposed action conflicts with the Coastal Management Program polices, attach a shoe th t notes the policy(ies), describes the conflict(s), and specifies conditions to mitigate the conflict(s). Attachment - Yes: v No: 4. Description of proposed action (attach site plan): ( 0 I x 7-n/ _0-.0h'f -• ..Q.'cf`s 5T2 5. Applicant Certi . is • certify that I w •• with the prov'.ions of the Kodiak Island Borough Code and that I have the authority to certify this as the property owner, or as a representative of the property owner. l a. : o ' V com : • in place in the field for v: ' cation of sec• . s. . By: �% .rri Date: ( ("3/ / Title: l.r. . . it.a_■i ... Supporting documents attached (check): Site plan: A As -built survey: Other (list): � �'�"'"`� - j' ��' " � � r / z6 Fa 6. Community Development staff for zoning, b ; ._._ Date: � 7 � Title: �SS�c,c_11 // ^ c G+.�.,..v�.. %.. Fire Chief [City of Kodiak, Fire District #1 (Bayside), Womens Bay Fire District] approval for UFC (Sections 10.207 and 10.301C) by: Date: 8. Driveway Permit (state, City of Kodiak, Borough) Issued by: Date: 9. Septic system PLAN approved by: Date: Distribution: File /Building Official /Applicant THIS FORM DOES NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION WHEN A BUILDING PERMIT IS REQUIRED July 1990 M UEP/4 )' VVA Y S. 89. 45, 00 F. �. Q X84. as8 LOT 7A AS-BUILT SURVEY /726/0 /(3/1( erg..• s *s!�9�L �� rill, Roy A. Ecklund 4II e+ti• -NO. 1638•S ; j�' r�1 _ ; rESSI0NAt. 1 hereby certify that 1 have surveyed the following described property: 1 Lor 84, 8‘06A-4, ,ri`L4.e/vEYAlga 5-'fo. )SS 32/ a'. l'447 4e2 WIZ and that the improvements- situatedthereonare .within the property lines and do not overlap or encroach on the property Tying adjacent thereto, that no Improvements on property lying adjacent thereto encroach on the premises in question and that there are no roadways. transmis- sion lines or other visible easements on said property except u indi- cated hereon. Dated this d.y of ✓A, .19 / ROY A. ECKLUND Registered Land Surveyor Sole: J "= 20' Drawn by: Rai. Date: ?- . Aye./ 9 88 Russell and Mary Grimm 217 Murphy Way Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Kodiak Island Borough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 -6340 PHONE (907) 486.5736 December 20, 1990 Re: Case 90 -081. Request for a variance from Section 17.20.040.0 (Yards) of the Borough Code to permit a ten (10) foot by twenty (20) foot shop addition to the rear of an existing single - family residence which will encroach no more than four (4) feet into the required ten (10) foot rear yard setback on a corner lot in the R3-- Multifamily Residential Zoning District. Lot SA, Block 1, Killarney Hills Subdivision; 217 Murphy Way Dear Mr. and Ms. Grimm: The Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting on December 19, 1990, granted the variance request cited above. THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT ALLOW ANY CONSTRUCTION TO BEGIN. Zoning compliance and /or a building permit must first be obtained. Please contact this office for further details. An appeal of this decision may be initiated by any person or party aggrieved by filing a written notice of appeal with the City Clerk within ten (10) days of the date of the Commission's decision. The notice of appeal must state the specific grounds for the appeal and the relief sought by the applicant. Therefore, the Commission's decision will not be final and effective until ten (10) days following the decision. Failure to utilize this variance within twelve (12) months after its effective date shall cause its cancellation. Please bring this letter when you come to our office to obtain zoning compliance for any construction on the lot. The Commission adopted the following findings of fact in support of their decision: n Kodiak Island Borough Russell and Mary Grimm December 20, 1990 Page Two 1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or intended use of development. which generally do not apply to other properties in the same land use district. , The exceptional physical circumstance in this case is the fact that this lot is a corner lot rather than an interior lot. Corner lots are more constrained than interior lots because a ten foot setback is required along the side lot line adjacent to the street. In addition, the rear lot line on this lot constitutes a side lot line for adjacent Lot 7A. While these conditions were pre- existing on the lot, subsequent development of a single- family dwelling did not adequately allow for future accessory uses that are reasonable and subsidiary to the primary use of the lot for residential purposes. The existing dwelling is presently located well back from all lot lines. While it appears that the addition of a shop to any of the other sides of the structure could be accommodated within the required setbacks, the ,addition would not fit as well with the architecture of the structure. 2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships. , Strict application of the Borough Code would not permit an addition to a single- family residence to encroach a rear yard setback. This would result in practical difficulty and unnecessary hardship for the property owners as they could not reasonably develop an attached shop elsewhere without compromising the architecture of their house. In addition, the lot line in question constitutes a side lot line requiring only a five (5) foot setback for adjacent Lot 7A. It appears that this same lot line could also serve adequately as a "side" lot line for Lot 8A without compromising the intent and purpose behind the establishment of required yard setbacks. Kodiak Island Borough Russell and Mary Grimm December 20, 1990 Page Three 3. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health. safety and welfare. Granting of this variance will not result in material damage or prejudice to other properties in the area. Allowing the shop addition to encroach into the rear yard setback no more than four (4) feet will still leave a six (6) foot setback in place. Considering the dwelling next door meets the required setbacks for the district, the minimum separation between structures will be over eleven (11) feet. Under similar circumstances, the Commission has granted other variances for accessory additions to residential structures located on corner lots. 4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan., Granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the comprehensive plan which identifies this area for High Density Residential Development. In addition, comprehensive plans do not address minor developments such as accessory additions to existing dwellings where traffic flow and population density remain unchanged. 5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance. In this instance, the actions of the applicant have not caused the conditions from which relief is being sought by variance. The variance will be decided prior to the construction of the proposed shop addition. Kodiak Island Borough Russell and Mary Grimm December 20, 1990 Page Four 6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the district involved. Accessory additions to single-family dwellings are permitted in the R3-- Multifamily Residential Zoning District. If you have any questions about the action of the Commission, please contact the Community Development Department. Sincerely, Patricia Eads, Secretary Community. Development Department cc: Bob Shuttlesworth • development is permitted by the RI—Single-family Residential and R2--Two-family Residential Zoning Districts. Both of these zoning districts require only a five (5) foot side yard setback. Therefore. granting this variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the comprehensive plan. 5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance. The actions of the applicant have not caused special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by variance. This case will be decided prior to initiating construction of this project. 6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the district involved. Additions to single-family dwellings are permitted in all residential zoning districts. The motion was seconded and CARRIED by majority roll call vote. Commissioners Hodgins and Barrett voted ''no." - - - - - ---- Case_90f0811 Request for a variance from Section 17.20.040.0 (Yards) of the Borough Code to permit a ten (10) foot by twenty (20) foot shop addition to the rear of an existing single-family residence which will encroach no more than four (4) feet into the required ten (10) foot rear yard setback on a corner lot in the R3—Multifamily Residential Zoning District. Lot 8A, Block 1, Killarney Hills Subdivision; 217 Murphy Way (Russell and Mary Grimm; Bob Shuttlesworth) LINDA FREED indicated 27 public hearing notices were mailed for this case and none were returned. Staff recommended approval of this request. Staff provided the Commission with a copy of an airphoto of the property as requested by the Commission at the packet review worksession. Regular Session Closed. Public Hearing Opened: BOB SHUTTLESWORTH, representing the applicant, appeared before the Commission to answer questions about this request. Public Hearing Closed. Regular Session Opened. COMMISSIONER HENDEL MOVED TO GRANT a variance from Section 17.20.040.0 of the Borough Code to permit a ten (10) foot by twenty (20) foot shop addition to the rear of an existing single-family residence which will encroach no more than four (4) feet into the required ten (10) foot rear yard setback on a corner lot in the R3—Multifamily Residential Zoning District on Lot 8A. Block 1, Killarney Hills Subdivision; and to adopt the findings contained in the staff report dated December 6, 1990 as "Findings of Fact" for this case. P Z Minutes: December 19. 1990 Page 4 of l3 FINDINO8 OF FACT 1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or intended use of development% which generally do not apply to other properties in the same land use district. The exceptional physical circumstance in this case is the fact that this lot is a corner lot rather than an interior lot. Corner lots are more constrained than interior loth because a ten foot setback is required along the side lot line adjacent to the street. In addition, the rear lot line on this lot constitutes a side lot line for adjacent Lot 7A. While these conditions were pre- existing on the lot, subsequent development of a single - family dwelling did not adequately allow for future accessory uses that are reasonable and subsidiary to the primary use of the lot for residential purposes. The existing dwelling is presently located well back from all lot lines. While it appears that the addition of a shop to any of the other sides of the structure could be accommodated within the required setbacks. the addition would not fit as well with the architecture of the structure. 2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships. , Strict application of the Borough Code would not permit an addition to a single - family residence to encroach a rear yard setback. This would result in practical difficulty and unnecessary hardship for the property owners as they could not reasonably develop an attached shop elsewhere without compromising the architecture of their house. In addition, the lot line in question constitutes a side lot line requiring only a five (5) foot setback for adjacent Lot 7A. It appears that this same lot line could also serve adequately as a "side" lot line for Lot 8A without compromising the intent and purpose behind the establishment of required yard setbacks. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health. safety and welfare. Granting of this variance will not result in material damage or prejudice to other properties in the area. Allowing the shop addition to encroach into the rear yard setback no more than four (4) feet will still leave a six (6) foot setback in place. Considering the dwelling next door meets the required setbacks for the district. the minimum separation between, structures will be over eleven (11) feet. Under similar circumstances, the Commission has granted other variances for accessory additions to residential structures located on corner lots. 4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. P & Z 11Snu4s December 19, 1990 Page 5 of 13 Granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the comprehensive plan which identifies this area for High Density Residential Development. In addition. comprehensive plans do not address minor developments such as accessory additions to existing dwellings where traffic flow and population density remain unchanged. 5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special, conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance. In this instance. the actions of the applicant have not caused the conditions from which relief is being sought by variance. The valiance will be decided prior to the construction of the proposed shop addition. 6. That the granting of the variance will not permit prohibited land use in the district involved. Accessory additions to single-family dwellings are permitted in the R3—Multifamily Residential Zoning District. The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll call vote. D) Case 8-90-044. Request for preliminary approval of the vacation of Tracts S-4A-1A, S-4A-2A-1, and S-4A-2A-2, U.S. Survey 3218 and Lots 4 and 5-A, Lakeside Subdivision Second Addition and replat to Tract S-5 of portions of Tract S. U.S. Survey 3218 and Lots 4-A and 5-Al, Lakeside Subdivision Second Addition. 2675 114111 Bay Road and 160 and 170 Von Scheele Way and 2522 and 2620 Sellef Lane (Mill Bay Plaza Associates) LINDA FREED indicated 35 public hearing notices were mailed for this case and 1 was returned by the City of Kodiak. The public hearing notice returned by the City Manager stated that the City Council wants the conditions of the replat to include the annexation of that portion of Lot 4, Lakeside Subdivision Second Addition that is outside the City limits of the City of Kodiak. primarily because it creates a jurisdictional problem for the police, fire. and other City departments. Staff recommended approval of this request. Regular Session Closed. Public Hearing Opened: Seeing and hearing none. Public Hearing Closed. Regular Session Opened. COMMISSIONER BARRETT MOVED. TO GRANT preliminary approval of the vacation of Tracts S-4A-1A, S-4A-2A-1. and S- 4A-2A-2. U.S. Survey 3218 and Lots 4 and 5A, Lakeside P & Z Meats= December 19, 1990 Page 8 of 13 1"61111U . . ' ii.r * --C „.„ c9h CANIr' • r' DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: RE: Public Hearing Item VI -C Kodiak Island Borough MEMORANDUM December 6, 1990 Planning and Zoning Commission Community Development Department Information for the December 19, 1990 egular Meeting Case 90 -081. Request for a variance from Section 17.20.040.0 (Yards) of the Borough Code to permit a ten (10) foot by twenty (20) foot shop addition to the rear of an existing single - family residence which will encroach no more than four (4) feet into the required ten (10) foot rear yard setback on a corner lot in the R3-- Multifamily Residential Zoning District. Lot 8A, Block 1, Killarney Hills Subdivision; 217 Murphy Way (Russell and Mary Grim; Bob Shuttlesworth) Twenty -seven (27) public 1990. Date of site visit: 1. Applicant: 2. Land Owner: 3. Existing Zoning: 4. Zoning History: Location: Physical: Legal: 6. Lot Size: hearing notices were distributed on December 6, December 4, 1990 Russell and Mary Grim /Bob Shuttlesworth Russell and Mary Grim R3-- Multifamily Residential The 1968 Comprehensive Plan identifies this area as Residential - -R2. Rezoned to R3-- Multifamily Residential by Ordinance No. 71 -12 -0. 217 Murphy Way Lot 8A, Block 1, Killarney Hills Subdivision 7,283 square feet Case 90 -081 Page 1 of 7 P & Z: December 19, 1990 Public Hearing Item VI-C 7. Existing Land Use: Single-family residential 8. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North: Lot 6, Block 3, Killarney Hills Subdivision Use: Single family residence with appartment Zoning: R2--Two-Family Residential South: Unit 2, Kadiak Alaska Subdivision Use: Vacant Zoning: PL--Public Use Land • East: Lot 1, Block 2, Killarney Hills Subdivision Use: Single family residence • Zoning: R2--Two-Family Residential West: Lot 7A, Block 1, Killarney Hills Subdivision Use: Single family residence Zoning: R3—Multifamily Residential 9. Comprehensive Plan: 10. Applicable Regulations: The 1968 Comprehensive Plan depicts this area as High Density Residential. The following sections of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Borough Code and the Kodiak Island Borough Coastal. Management Program are applicable to this request: 17.06.390 Lot line, front--Corner lot. A "Front lot line" of a corner lot means the shortest street line of a corner lot. 17.06.410 Lot line. rear. "Rear lot line" means a line that is opposite and most distant from the front lot line, and in the case of irregular, triangular or gore shaped lot, a line not less than ten feet in length, within a lot, parallel to and at the maximum distance from the front lot line. 17.20.040 Yards. C. Rear Yard. The minimum rear yard required is ten feet. Case 90-081 Page 2 of 7 P & Z: December 19, 1990 Public Hearing Item VI-C COASTAL MANAGEMENT APPLICABLE POLICIES Residential Development 1. Location In areas with poorly draining soils, development where feasible shall be connected to a sewer. line. Where .this is not feasible, onsite facilities shall be designed so as not to cause conditions that will pollute rivers, lakes, and other water bodies, including the ground water supply. Consistent: Yes. The lot is served by public sewer. 2. Open Space Green areas and open space shall be retained to the maximum extent feasible and prudent when land is subdivided. Consistent: Not applicable. This action does not involve land subdivision. 3. Access New subdivisions or other residential developments on the shoreline shall provide usable public access to and along the shoreline, extending the length of the development, to the extent feasible and prudent. Consistent: Not applicable. This lot is not located along the shoreline. 4. Hazardous Lands Case 90-081 Development shall not occur in hazardous areas such as avalanche runout zones, active floodplains, and high water channels to the extent feasible and prudent. Siting, design, and construction measures to minimize exposure to coastal erosion, Page 3 of 7 P & Z: December 19, 1990 Public Hearing Item VI -C mass wasting and historic tsunami run -up shall be required to the extent feasible and prudent. Consistent: Not applicable. This lot is not located in a known hazardous area. 5. Wetlands Filling and drainage of water bodies, floodways, backshores, and natural wetlands shall be consistent with ACMP Standards 6 AAC 80.070 (Energy Facilities) and 6 AAC 80.130 (Habitats) . Consistent: Not applicable. This action does not involve filling or draining water °bodies, floodways, backshores, and natural wetlands. COMMENTS This request is intended to permit the addition of a ten by twenty (10 x 20) foot shop to the side of an existing single family residence. This addition will project no more than four (4) feet into the required ten (10) foot rear yard setback on a lot in the R3 -- Multifamily Residential Zoning District. Staff notes that this lot is a corner lot, and like many other corner lots is somewhat more constrained where development is concerned than a comparable interior lot. In addition, the rear lot line in question constitutes a side lot line for the adjacent lot. It seems reasonable to staff that as long as the minimum separation for the main structures on each side of this lot line is at least five (5) feet, then the intent of code will be met This request is based on the feeling by the applicants that to put the addition in any other yard, where the setbacks can be met, will not be compatible with the existing architecture of the . single - family residence. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or intended use of development. which generally do not apply to other properties in the same land use district. Case 90 -081 Page 4 of 7 P & Z: December 19, 1990 Public Hearing Item V1-C The exceptional physical circustance in this case is the fact that this lot is a corner lot rather than an interior lot. Corner lots are more constrained than interior lots because a ten foot setback is required along the side lot line adjacent to the street. In addition, the rear lot line on this lot constitutes a side lot line for adjacent Lot 7A. While these conditions were pre-wdsting on the lot, subsequent development of a single-family dwelling did not adequately allow for future accessory uses that are reasonable and subsidiary to the primary use of the lot for residential purposes. The existing dwelling is presently located well back from all lot lines. While it appears that the addition of a shop to any of the other sides of the structure could be accomodated within the required setbacks, the addition would not fit as well with the architecture of the structure. 2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships. Strict application of the Borough Code would not permit an addition to a single-family residence to encroach a rear yard setback. This would result in practical difficulty and unnecessary hardship for the property owners as they could not reasonably develop an attached shop elsewhere without compromising the architecture of their house. In addition, the lot line in question constitutes a side lot line requiring only a five (5) foot setback for adjacent Lot 7A. It appears that this same lot line could also serve adequately as a "side" lot line for Lot 8A without compromising the intent and purpose behind the establishment of required yard setbacks. • 3. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the • public's health. safety and welfare. Granting of this variance will not result in material damage or prejudice to other properties in the area. Allowing the shop addition to encroach into the rear yard setback no more than four (4) feet will still leave a six (6) foot setback in place. Considering the dwelling next door meets the required setbacks for the district, the minimum separation between structures will be over eleven (11) feet. Under similar circumstances, the Commission has granted other variances for accessory additions to residential structures located on corner lots. Case 90-081 Page 5 of 7 P & Z: December 19, 1990 Public Hearing Item VI -C 4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the comprehensive plan which identifies this area for High Density Residential Development. In addition, comprehensive plans do not address minor developments such as accessory additions to existing dwellings where traffic flow and population density remain unchanged. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance. In this instance, the actions of the applicant have not caused the conditions from which relief is being sought by variance. The variance will be decided prior to the construction of the proposed shop addition. 6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the district involved. Accessory additions to single - family dwellings are permitted in the R3 -- Multifamily Residential Zoning District. RECOMMENDATION Staff finds that this request does meet all the conditions necessary for a variance to be granted under Chapter 17.66 (Variance) of the Borough Code. APPROPRIATE MOTION Should the Commission agree with the staff recommendation, the appropriate motion is: Move to grant a request for a variance from Section 17.20.040.0 of the Borough Code to permit a ten (10) foot by twenty (20) foot shop addition to the rear of an existing single - family residence which will encroach no Case 90 -081 Page 6 of 7 P & Z: December 19, 1990 Case 90-081 Public Hearing Item VI-C more than four (4) feet into the required ten (10) foot rear yard setback on a corner lot in the R3-- Multifamily Residential Zoning District on Lot 8A, Block 1, Killarney Hills Subdivision; subject to the condition of approval contained in the staff report dated December 6, 1990; and to adopt the findings contained in the staff report dated December 6, 1990 as "Findings of Fact" for this case. Page 7 of 7 P & Z: December 19, 1990 MU'PN }' WAY . 1 .5. 8 5'00" L . kS 4 ', '64.681 goCPv . N .__.... • %mom. V AS •BUILT SURVEY. 5:64„ iv, 40 -JJ + +"■■■Visr .9 •' 0* jis 0 sir 4 li �: • Roy A. Ecklund a a # :n •k NO. 1638•S •••44%.1. 11444, ...... ...•• ;Oe'JQi Ja` OFfSSIONALk -i 1 hereby certify that i have surveyed the following described property: / ©r 84, 8i.acK /, ' /L'4, 6'Ey/-ti/L4f SU(Y©• (JSS 32 /B, P/. 4rN.R 78 -ZZ and that the Improvements situated thereon are within the property lines and do not overlap or encroach on the property lying adjacent thereto, that no Improvements on property lying adjacent thereto encroach on the premises In question and that there are no roadways, transmis- sion lines or other visible easements on said property except es Inds• eared hereon. Dated this day of ` ROY A. ECKLUND Registered Land Surveyor Scale: 1 " = 20 Drawn by: , E. - -/-""4/6,J 19 Date: ? -JANE -/988 inlrqun of 35: feet 'roil exterior lot Imes .1fI, 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 -6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 Kodiak IslandBorough December 6, 1990 Russell and Mary Grimm 217 Murphy Way Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Re: Case 90 -081. Request for a variance from Section 17.20.040.0 (Yards) of the Borough Code to permit a ten (10) foot by twenty (20) foot shop addition to the rear of an existing single - family residence which will encroach no more than four (4) feet into the required ten (10) foot rear yard setback on a corner lot in the R3-- Multifamily Residential Zoning District. Lot 8A, Block 1, Killarney Hills Subdivision; 217 Murphy Way Dear Mr. and, Ms. Grimm: Please be advised that the request referenced above has been scheduled for review and action by the Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission at their December 19, 1990 regular meeting. This meeting will begin at 7:30 p.m. in the Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska. Attendance at this meeting is recommended. The week prior to the regular meeting, on Wednesday, December 12, 1990, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Conference Room ( #121), the Commission will hold a worksession to review the packet material for the regular meeting. You are invited to attend this worksession in order to respond to any questions the Commission may have regarding this request. If you have any questions, please call the Community Development Department at 486 -5736, extension 255. Sincerely, Patricia Eads, Secretary Community Development Department cc: Bob Shuttlesworth K4 ►IAK ISLAND BOROt: H COMMUMTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 710 Mill Bay Road. Kodiak, Alaska, 99615 Public Hearing Item C PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE A public hearing will be held on Wednesday, December 19, 1990. The meeting will begin at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska, before the Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission, to hear comments, if any, on the following request: Case 90 -081. Request for a variance from Section 17.20.040.0 (Yards) of the Borough Code to permit a ten (10) foot by twenty (20) foot shop addition to the rear of an existing single - family residence which will encroach np more than four (4) feet into the required ten (10) foot rear yard setback on a corner lot in the R3-- Multifamily Residential Zoning District. Lot 8A, Block 1, Killarney Hills Subdivision; 217 Murphy Way (Russell and Mary Grimm; Bob Shuttlesworth) If you do not wish to testify verbally, you may provide your comments in the space below. or in a letter to the Community Development Department prior to the meeting. This notice is bring Bent to you because our records indicate you are a property owner in the area of the request If you have any questions about the request, please feel free to call us at 486 -5736, extension 255. Your Na me: Mailing Address: Tour property desmiptlon: Comments: Lot 8A, Bloc <i1rey- Puo(ic \once Area ininun of 350 feet fro exterior lot. lines R1180010040 BERGER,JOHN & MARGARET 1414 MSTREET ANCHORAGE AK 99501 R1180010050 KUTCHIKIRONALD & ROSA P.O. BOX 2295 KODIAK AK 99615 R 1180010060 -MAGNUSEN,CHARLES & CATHY P.O. BOX 1512 KODIAK AK 99615 SKAW,ALAN & JILL P.O. BOX 842 KODIAK R1180010071 AK 99615 R1180010081 GRIMM,RUSSELL & MARY 217 MURPHY WAY KODIAK AK 99615 R 1180010090 NAGANIJAMES 1217 E REZANOF DR KODIAK AK 99615 R1180020010 KNOWLESIADRIAN & COLLEEN P.O. BOX 3343 KODIAK AK 99615 R1180020020 nORQT.CM-IAMPC P MAOIVC JOSEPH,MARTY P.O. BOX 2938 KODIAK R 1180010030 AK 99615 R1510000015 ZHAROFF,FRED & YVONNE P.O. BOX 405 KODIAK AK 99615 r.u. ouA 4554 KODIAK AK 99615 YATSIK,LAOUITA P.O. BOX 13 KODIAK R1180030010 AK 99615 R 1180030020 .ZIMMER,ARTHUR & ARLENE P.O. BOX 1582 KODIAK AK 99615 R1180030030 MEUNIER,HENRY & SARAH RENTAL P.O. BOX 2732 KODIAK AK 99615 R1180030040 RICHARDSON,FRANCIS/CAROL P.O. BOX 2637 KODIAK AK 99615 R1180030050 BUTLER,JOHN & MAUREEN RENTAL P.O. BOX 2610 KODIAK AK 99615 R1180030060 WISCHERITHOMAS/KATHLEEN P.O. BOX 202 KODIAK AK 99615 _,,„,./1180030070 0e WISCHER,THO6ZKATHLEEN P.O. BOX 2 KO R1180030080 CORP OF THE CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF ANCHORAGE P.O. BOX 10 -2239 ANCHORAGE AK 99510 TAYLOR •LARRY P.O. BOX 4148 KODIAK 81180030090 AK 99615 R 1180030100 SURYAN,WILLIAM C JOANNE P.O. BOX 2802 KODIAK AK 99615 R1180040010 MACHULSKY ETAL,MICHAEL JONE SULESKI P.O. BOX 3833 KODIAK AK 99615 R 1180040011 MACHULSKY,M ICHAEL RENTAL 310 MURPHY WAY KODIAK AK 99615 R1180040020 HUCKINS,WILLIAM C SHARON 3224 W00DY WAY LOOP KODIAK AK 99615 1180040030 CATHOLI RCHB HOP CORP P.O. BOX 10 ANCHORAG- 99510 R1180040040 CATHOL.0 kRCHBISHOP CORP P.O. BOX —2239 ANCHORa E AK 99510 R1452150010 KOD K ISLAND °ROUGH 01(1 18 710 MILL RD KODIAK AK 99615 CORP IF ST OF THE P.O. BOX ANCHOR R 1452170000 MARY'S PARISH OF ANCHORAGE 2239 AK 99510 R1170000001 ALASKA,UNIVERSITY OF 2401 CUTTOFF ROAD KODIAK AK 99615 R1170000002 ALASKATUNIVERSITY OF COLLEGE AK 99735 R1510000011 RUSSELL,STEVEN & SUSAN P.O. BOX 2183 KODIAK AK 99615 RUSSEL P.O. 8 KOD R1510000012 & SUSAN ZHAR K 99615 R1510V60013 YVONNE q o- 0E'1 n __ (BA_I t r2 M 00(0 0 12 \1g OODO dab UNIT 1 Lot 'a ^, BLo <Jeyar c 1, 1LLs Puoc \otice Area nirqun of 35: feet fron exterior lot lines KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 710 MILL BAY ROAD, ROOM 204, KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340, (907) 486-5736 The application fee for all items covered by this form is fifty dollars ($50.00), except as otherwise noted. Conditional Use Permits, Exceptions, and Variance appllcetlons also requlre the submission of a site plan. Applicant Information Property owner's name: ijSL gil Property owner's mailing address: r:,./17 /Mu- efidy 60141 City: p Q t /We , State: ,-qi<„. Zip: Home phone: z-/k 51‘sz) Work phone: If applicable, Agent's name: / 4-) i(-7-zt. A7z EswegeeK Agent's mailing address: Dr 6 1C 44P// City: p 4 /A1/6 i State: 4"/ Zip: Home phone: 3 s-.6P Work phone: Property Information Legal Description: L Dr F /? A/4 . 4i47 Present use use of property: -,Y k Proposed use of property: /0 ( -AV OP-- a, ....e‘c.7. 472_ GA) ei ) c-- 4142_e_k t Li-ea- Ike, d br-4 ttJ 2.7)- Mi Applicant Certification 3 1, the appllcant./euthorlzed agent, have been advised of the procedures Involved with this requeet copy of the appropriate regulations. Disivt-1-4-, and have recleved a // 26776 ..„. / Author' 4f •ent's Signature IP - te P • eerty Owners Signlo Date STAFF USE ONLY Code Section(s) involved: . A 0 ( Conditional Use Permit Exception Variance Title 18 Review Other (e.g., aperance requests, etc.) non-fee Items Zoning cjnge1Jtrom 4 to Application accepted: ,/ // 2 ‘X'd Staff signature Date accepted CASH RECEIPT Kodiak Island Boroug,d 710 UPPER MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486 -5736 RECEIVED FROM 1 000 101 -10 -00 010 -000- 105 -01 -00 010- 000 - 105 -06 -00 010 - 000 - 111 -b1 -00 010 - 000 - 107- 040 - 000 - 371 - 11 - 00 040 - 000 -371 - 12 -00 010 - 000 - 368 -51 -00 010 -000 -322- 11 -00 010 -000- 319 -10 -00 010 - 000 - 199 -99 -00 CASH 17618 DATE 02L 199e PROPERTY TAX, REAL PROPERTY TAX, PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX, LIENS PERSONAL TAX, LIENS LAND SALE, PRINCIPAL LAND SALE, INTEREST SALE OF COPIES BUILDING PERMIT PENALTIES, INTEREST CLEARING PER ATTACHED CONDITIONS OF CHECK PAYMENTS PAYMENTS TENDERED BY CHECK FOR OBLIGATIONS DUE TO THE BOROUGH ARE SATISFIED ONLY UPON THE CHECK BEING HONORED. RETURNED CHECKS FOR ANY REASON RESTORES THE OBLIGATION AS UNPAID AND SUBJECTS THE PAYER TO ANY CHARGES, FEES OR OTHER LEGAL LIABILITIES AS MAY BE APPLICABLE. TOTAL r► CASHIER ®S PAYMENT CHECK NO. CASH OTHER E BY: FM08- 511815