The URL can be used to link to this page

KADIAK AK TR B-1 UNIT 5 - ExceptionDATE RECEIVED ^�M MEETING DATE APPLICATION /^��/ /�o � CASE CHECK LIST LETTER FROM APPLICANT IF NEEDED PUBLIC HEARING NOTICES SENT LETTER TO APPLICANT/TELLING OF PUBLIC HEARING DATE) PLAT IF REQUIRED PLOT PLAN IF REQUIRED DENIED APPROVED LETTER TO APPLICANT TELL WHETHER DENIED OR APPROVED TO BOROUGH ASSEMBLY (IF REQUIRED) ACTION TAKEN BY P & Z COMMISSION ACTION TAKEN BY THE BOROUGH ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. (P & Z\ RESOLUTION NO. /BOROUGH ASSEMBLY) ORDINANCE NO. (BOROUGH ASSEMBLY) 3-1 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH just 31, 1983 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH August 31, 1983 Kodiu lsl ndfBoroug DEPT. O WI 1 RONMENTAL CONSERVATION RECEIVED 18.09LH SOUTHCENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE JAN111983 PM Y igr,S..i�1�1�12131`lbl Mr. William A. Walton Director, Community Development Department Kodiak Island Borough Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Subject: Wastewater Regulations Dear Mr. Walton: 'ti\-4 1314757 . o)NJanuary 4, 19836 egg e Y cv• \ F fib. ,�O�Gv J��L 004164' JAY S. NAMMOND, GOVERNOR 437 E. Street • ANCOHORAGE, ALASKA 99501 (907) 274 -2533 P.O. BOX 515 KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 (907) 486 -3350 P.O. BOX 1207 SOLDOTNA, ALASKA 99669 (907) 262 -5210 P.O. BOX 1709 ❑ VALDEZ, ALASKA 99686 (907) 835 -4698 P.O. BOX 1064 E WASILLA, ALASKA 99687 (907) 376 -5038 Please accept my apology for the delay in responding to your letter of November 1, 1982. It was transmitted to me on the week of December 27, 1982 for reply. First, Harry did not have the authority under our regulations to have the 3 trailers removed or does the State have the authority to require that a home or trailer install sanitary facilities i.e., toilet, shower, basin, sink. Our wastewater regulation states what is required to treat domestic and community wastewater. This regulation makes no distinction between grey or black wastewater and treats them as one. Regarding the mobile home on Woody Way discussed in Bill Hodgin's memo of October 21, 1982, our policy or regulation have not changed. Harry, did not talk to his supervisor because I was on leave. However, he did talk to the District Engineer, Bruce Erickson who told Harry that grey water was wastewater and had to be treated as wastewater. Harry, must have misunderstood the conversation because as I mentioned before there has never been a change in our policy or regulation on this subject or in our new wastewater regulation effective December 30, 1982. The Department can institute legal action usually in the form of a "Notice of Violation" for discharging wastewater to the ground or water without treatment and require that the wastewater system be installed according to the regulations. However, we are at a disadvantage in that we have to find the discharge which is usually from a complaint. I plan to be in Kodiak the later part of January and will plan to see you at that time. JCA /msm cc: Phil Shealy Harry Brighton Very truly yours, James C. Allen Anchorage /Western District Supervisor KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH MEMORANDUM DATE: October 21, 1982 TO: Will Walton, Director of Community Development FROM: Bill Hodgins, Zoning Officer00 RE: R/V trailer sanitary disposal for KIHA Project. Harold Brighton, District Sanitarian called me this afternoon at 4:15 p.m. in regards to the R/V trailer located on Woody Way. Mr. Brighton stated that he had called ,his superViors in Anchorage to find out if the disposal of grey water directly onto the ground from this R/V trailer was "kosher".. He stated that his supervisors said that it was permitted or rather "acceptable". Mr. Brighton also stated that he would periodically inspect this unit to see that this disposal arrangement doesn't get out of hand. I'm sure glad that this is a small trailer!! KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH MEMORANDUM DATE: October 7, 1982 TO: Harold Brighton, State Sanitarian FROM: Bill Hodgins, Zoning Officer RE: Trailer located on Tracts B and E, Kadiak Alaska Subdivision. (KIHA) I bring to your attention the possible lack of a proper sanitary disposal system for a trailer used as a watchman's dwelling for the Kodiak Island Housing Authority's low income housing project located on the above referenced property on Woody Way. Apparently this unit presently disposes its wastewater directly onto the ground below the unit. Please look into this per State Sanitary requirements. CC: Dave Crowe, Borough Engineer Phil Shealy, Borough Manager Morris Lee, City Building Official WRH/jmj BUILDING DEPARTMENT — CITY/ BOROUGH OF KODIAK Applicant to fill in between heavy lines. APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT AND CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY BUILDING ADDRESS CLASS OF WORK NEW DEMOLISH LRaAd.Tak Alaska Subdivision ALTERATION REPAIR - I oociy"'wayT'and Rezanof Dr. E. ADDITION MOVE BUILDING PERMIT NO. USE OF BUILDING 7. Storage Buildings uJ W Z 0 X5aiak Island Hsg Authority V.VDTox 197 SIZE OF BUILDING Various HEIGHT 8' NO. OF ROOMS 48 NO. OF FLOORS 1 CITY TEL. NO. Kodiak, AK 486 -5721 NO. OF BUILDINGS 7 VALUATION DATE ISSUED / /7L' BLDG ./ -1/Z S` Py3 PLAN CHK. FEE TOTAL /y3 `design Lab, Inc. NO. OF BUILDINGS NOW ON LOT 0 BUILDING PLUMBING ELECTRIC NO. OF FAMILIES 0 FOUNDATION ROUGH ROUGH ttgElesyt 5th Avenue SIZE OF LOT See Site Plan FRAME SEPTIC TANK FINISH anchorage, AK USE OF BLDG. NOW ON LOT n/a PLASTER SEWER FIXTURES SPECIFICATIONS FLUES GAS MOTORS cc 0 1- U 1- F Z O U STATE LICENSE NO. 4455 -A `'iountai n Pacific Co. FOUNDATION FINAL FINISH FINAL MATERIAL EXTERIOR, PIERS WIDTH OF TOP 7ssS. Jackson St. WIDTH OF BOTTOM CS�eattle, WA STATE LICENSE NO. A -10001 • DEPTH IN GROUND R.W. PLATE (SILL) SIZE SPA.,. SPAN SUBDIVISION Kadiak Alaska Subdivision GIRDERS JOIST Ist. FL, JOIST 2nd. FL. LOT NO. Tracts B and E BLK. JOIST CEILING EXTERIOR STUDS DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE Type of Construction I, II, III, iv, g, vi 2. Occupancy Group A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, 1,0 Div. 1, 2, 3, 4, 3. Fire Zone 1 2 3 4 INTERIOR STUDS ROOF RAFTERS 2x6 24" 6'0 II BEARING WALLS 2x6 COVERING EXTERIOR WALLS Plywood INTERIOR WALLS ROOF REROOFING FLUES FIREPLACE FL. FURNACE KITCHEN WATER HEATER FURNACE GAS OIL I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the above is correct and agree to comply with all City Ordinances and State Laws regulating building construction. Applicant 1,152 sq. ft. total L111 \ Approved: CHIEF BUILDING OFFICAL `✓ 1 By • 3N11 Afll3dQL1d 6R1'7.1/ PLOT PLAN A SETBACK 3N11 .11L13dONd STREET PLANNING Sc ZONING INFO ZONING DISTRICT A..— TYPE OF OCCUPANC NUMBER OF STORIES ./ TOTAL HT. AREA OF LOT /1/5; 3�O ` FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM PROP. LINErj 1l�� SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM PROP. LINE ,67,Y SA Wi, /7 /8'410 ® REAR YARD jVi'' Approved: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR By BUILDING DEPARTMENT— CITY / BOROUGH OF KODIAKi Building A Applicant to fill in between heavy lines. • BUILDING ADDRESS 2E86- kA/00c(9 C1,-G/. CLASS OF WORK LOCALITY Kadiak Alaska _Subd iv NEAREST CROSS ST. Woody Way & Rezanof NAME Kodiak Island Housing MAIL ADDRESS Box 197 CHITECT 0 ccw w NEW x ALTERATION DEMOLISH REPAIR ADDITION MOVE USE OF BUILDING SIZE OF BUILDING NO. OF ROOMS housing 88x36 63 HEIGHT 32 CITY ' TEL. NO. Kodiak 486-5721 NO, OF FLOORS 2 NO, OF BUILDINGS 1 NAME Design Lab, Inc. 7 in project NO. OF BUILDINGS NOW ON LOT -o- APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT AND CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY BUILDING PERMIT NO. VALUATION DATE ISSUED 4-99co BLDG. FEE 7993 PLAN CHK, FEE TOTAL 799- 3c, BUILDING PLUMBING ELECTRIC NO. OF FAMILIES ADDRESS 625 West 5th Ave. FOUNDATION ROUGH ROUGH SIZE OF LOT see site plan FRAME SEPTIC TANK FINISH CITY Anchorage USE OF BLDG. NOW ON LOT n/a PLASTER SEWER FIXTURES SPECIFICATIONS FLUES GAS MOTORS STATE LICENSE NO, 4455-A 0 1- z 0 NAME Mountain Pacific Co. FOUNDATION FINAL FINISH FINAL MATERIAL EXTERIOR. PIERS 1761s7 So. Jackson St. WIDTH OF TOP _ 5*.f, WIDTH OF BOTTOM -6" 11-6" c'geattle DEPTH IN GROUND R.W. PLATE (SILL) STATE LICENSE NO. A-10001 -6" 11-0" 2.x6 AWWF SIZE SPA:. SPAN SUBDIVISION Kadiak Alaska GIRDERS JOIST 1st. FL. JOIST 2nd. FL. LOT NO. BLK. Tracts B and E JOIST CEILING see str ur.t.ur varie al s) EXTERIOR STUDS 2x6 24" 8 0" DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE 'Type of Construction I, II, 111,1v, v,6) 2. Occupancy Group A, 8, C, D, E, F, G, I, J Div. 1, 2, 3, 4, rp. 3. Fire Zone 1 2 3 4 INTERIOR STUDS ROOF RAFTERS BEARING WALLS 2x4 24"- 8'0" RRP plan 2x6 24" 810f, COVERING EXTERIOR WALLS Dri vi t INTERIOR WALLS drywall REROOFING f'tcOmp. sh FLUES FIREPLACE FL FURNACE central KITCHEN yes WATER HEATER cent FURNACE ctentr al GAS no OIL yes AVIC, Thereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the above is- correct and agree to comply with all Ci y Ordinances and State Laws regula ng building co struction. Applicant 171(4%- 3 a._1--.0.6( Remote readout water meter must be instal led inside building with digi tal readout mounted on exterior 9 building where readily available for reading._ Approved: , CH F BUILDING OFFICAL By- 3NI1 Ala3dOHd PLOT PLAN 3N11 Ala3dOad SETBACK STREET PLANNING & ZONING INFO. ZONING DISTRICT Z: TYPE OF OCCUPANCY NUMBER OF STORIES TOTAL HT. AREA OF LOT / .•_••11. (o. Z../ 7-7Z. FRONT YARD SETBACK ROM PROP. LINE..052 - SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM PROP. LINE REAR YARD Approved: ZONING ADMINJ, By BUILDING DEPARTMENT — CITY / buR0 Building B Applicant to fill in between heavy lines. KODIAK APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT AND CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY UILDING ADDRESS 07-s vv6oDyco6LE °cALdiak Alaska. Subdiv. NEW CLASS OF WORK X DEMOLISH ALTERATION NEAREST CROSS ST. Woody Way & Rezanof REPAI R ADDITION MOVE USE OF BUILDING housing BU DING PERMIT NO. 5 9 7 - - • kBEak Island Housing Z MAIL ADDRESS 13ox197 (3 CITY TEL. NO. Kodiak. 486-5721 IZE OF BUILDING 100x86 HEIGHT 32 NO, OF ROOMS 72 NO. OF FLOORS 2 NO. OF BUILDINGS 1 7 n project VALUATION 3953 2. DATE ISSUED BLDG. FEE S 2.6 PLAN CHK. FEE TOTAL NAME Design Lab., Inc. W ADDRESS 5th Ave. '9 WY Anchorage NO. OF BUILDINGS NOW ON LOT -0- BUILDING ' PLUMBING .1/49- ELECTRIC NO. OF FAMILIES • see site p SIZE OF LOT USE OF BLDG. NOW ON LOT n SPECIFICATIONS STATE LICENSE NO, 4455-A FOUNDATION FOUNDATION FRAME PLASTER F LU E FINAL ROUGH ROUGH EPTIC TANK FINISH SEWER FIXTURES GAS MOTORS FINISH FINAL NAME mMountain Pacific Co. 0 1ASS o Jackson St X CITY 'Seattle MATERIAL EXTERIOR, PIERS WIDTH OF TOP DTH OF BOTTO Si 9. DEPTH IN GROUND 6" Tt .W. PLATE (SILL) 2x6 AWWF 0 u STATE LICENSE NO. A-10001 SIZE SPA... : SPAN • SUBDIVISION 0 J 11. ct W • L.) LOT NO BLK. —I O • Tracts B and E Kadiak Alaska GIRDER JOIST 1st. FL. JOIST 2nd. FL. JOIST CEILING see str (v uctural arie ) EXTERIOR STU 2x6 24" 8'O DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE Type of Construction 1, II, III, 1„,e VI 2. Occupancy Group A, 13, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J Div. 1, 2, 3, 4, 3. Fire Zone 1 23 4 INTERIOR STUDS ROOF RAFTERS BEARING WALLS 4 see 2x COVERING plan 24" 8 ' 0" comp. -1) 1 vi t RWISing1RS EXTERIOR WAL6-5.1,.. INTERIOR WALLS REROOFING drywa FLUES Fl REPLACE FL. FURNACE cen KITCHEN yes FURNACE central WATER HEAT Efil,Pn GA OIL no yes dkcif74 S/. Reu I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the above is correct and agree to comply with all ,City Ordinances and State Laws regul ing bui eirlg co struction. f4( 00 7 33 2- Remote readout water meter must be installed inside building with digital readout mounted on exterior of building where readily available for reading. g_e,ce:4 oi\-1k Approved: CHIEF BUILDING OFFICAL By: tiL ZONING DISTRICT 3N11 J.113dO dd PLOT PLAN A 3N11 A1233dO2dd • STREET PLANNING & ZONING INFO. TYPE OF OCCUPANCY NUMBER OF STORIES • . TOTAL HT. .3Z../ AREA OF LOT 77-Z. FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM PROP. UN SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM PROP. LINE REAR YARD Approved: ZONING ADM By 6610 , ex70 ISTRATOR /2- BUILDING DEPARTMENT — CITY / BOROUGH OF-KOLIIAK Building C BUILDING ADDRESS 6S.. WOODY C*ifrde. LOCALITY Kadiak Alaska Subdiv. NEARESTC3T cI7 Way & Rezanof NtSdiak Island Housing_ Applicant to fill in between heavy lines. CLASS OF WORK z 0 u w w " MtiloSIrRig7 NEW x DEMOLISH ALTERATION REPA I R ADDITION MOVE USE OF BUILDING housing SIZE OF' BUILDING 126x36 HEIGHT 32 NO. OF ROOMS 81 NO, OF FLOORS 2 CTY 48e021 NAME Design Lab., Inc. NO. OF BUILDINGS 1_ — 7 i n project NO. OF BUILDINGS NOW ON LOT -0- APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT AND CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY BUILDING PERMIT NO. 474.6- VALUATION x,49873 DATE ISSUED BLDG. FEE $f/33 39 PLAN CHK. FEE TOTAL BUILDING PLUMBING /1 ELECTRIC NO. OF FAMILIES -- 9— ADDRESS _ 25 West 5th Ave. CITY Anchorage SIZE OF LOT see site plan USE OF BLDG. NOW ON LOT n/a SPECIFICATIONS FOUNDATION FRAME ROUGH ROUGH „ SEPTIC TANK FINISH PLASTER SEWER FIXTURES FLUES GAS MOTORS STATE LICENSE NO. 4455-A FOUNDATION FINAL FINISH FINAL NAME Mountain Pacific Co. MATERIAL EXTERIOR, PIERS WIDTH OF TOP So. Jackson St. WI DTH OF BOTTOM 1 -6" 6" cteattle DEPTH IN GROUND u R.W. PLATE (SILL) 2x6 AWWF SPA.. STATE LICENSE NO. A-10001 SIZE SPAN DESCRIPTION SUBDIVISION Kadiak Alaska GIRDERS JOIST 1st. FL, JOIST 2nd. FL. LOT NO. BLK. Tracts B and E JOIST CEILING f see structural (varies) EXTERIOR STUDS 2x6 24" 8 0" DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE Type of Construction 1, 11, 111, IV VI 2. Occupancy Group A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J Div. 1, 2, 3, 4, 3. Fire Zone 1 2 3 4 INTERIOR STUDS ROOF RAFTERS 2x4 24" 8'0" see plan BEARING WALLS 2x6 COVERING 24" 8'0" EXTERIOR WALLbrivtt Sy comp -T 4'i INTERIOR WALLSdr ywall hn g 1 REROOFING FLUES FIREPLACE nla FL. FuRNAcEcentr KITCHEN yes WATER HEATEPC entr FURNACE central GAS no OIL yes Mh c d $lz, R.tatke.e hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the above is correct and agree to comply with all C'ty Ordinances and State Laws regul ng building -onstruction. Applicant ice rTfat Remote readout water meter must be installed inside building with digital readout mounted on exterior of building where readily available for reading. 3N11 A1L13dO2:1d PLOT PLAN SETBACK 3N11 Ala3dOUd STREET ZONING DISTRICT PLANNING & ZONING INFO. Zn53c60fA177/5V_____ TYPE OF OCCUPANCY - TOTAL HT. -73/ ber, NUMBER OF STORIES AREA OF LOT ' FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM PROP, LINE/0.5". SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM PROP. L,NE,3-y- Ec...7-7- Approved: CHIEF BUILDING OFFICAL Approved: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR Ale-/e /Zy By: (1) By BUILDING DEPARTMENT- CITY / B`OROUG.H OF KODIAK 'Building D Applicant to fill in between'beavy lines. BUILDING ADDRESS 284S Woo DY eiRcL� -CLASS OF WORK NEW DEMOLISH LOCALITY Kadiak Alaska Subdiv. NEARES ROSS ST. Woody Way & Rezanof z 0 E diak Island Housing bOXD� ALTERATION ADDITION USE OF BUILDING REPAIR MOVE APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT AND CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY BUILDING PERMIT NO. DATE ISSUED SIZE OF BUILDING NO. OF ROOMS housing 76xl00 HEIGHT 22 72 GI odiak 486 -721 NO. OF FLOORS 2 NO. OF BUILDINGS CI-IITECT ..,.GINEER NAME Design Lab., Inc. 7 in project NO. OF BUILDINGS NOW ON LOT -0- VALUATION 680370 BLDG. FEE /zLzY PLAN CHK. FEE S ZS TOTAL • /z 7z z BUILDING PLUMBING ELECTRIC NO. OF FAMILIES 8 ADDRESS' 625 West 5th Ave. SIZE OF LOT C TY Anchorage see site plan USE OF BLDG. NOW ON LOT n/a SPECIFICATIONS STATE LICENSE NO. . 4455 -A FOUNDATION FOUNDATION FRAME PLASTER FLUES FINAL ROUGH ROUGH SEPTIC TANK FINISH SEWER FIXTURES GAS MOTORS FINISH FINAL re O 0 U 1- F z 0 U NAME Mountain Pacific Co. MATERIAL EXTERIOR, PIERS ADDRESS 1617 So. Jackson St WIDTH OF TOP WIDTH OF BOTTOM Weattle STATE LICENSE NO. ' A -10001 DEPTH IN GROUND R.W. PLATE (SILL) 5211 l'6"- 3'6" cJ 2 ,1 1'6 ,1 1'0" 2x6 AWWF SIZE SPA..,. SPAN Q w J DESCRIPTION SUBDIVISION Kadiak Alaska LOT NO. BLK. Tracts B and E GIRDERS JOIST 1st. FL. JOIST 2nd. FL. JOIST CEILING r see? str (v u`ctu arie \al l' DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE. Type of Construction I, II, 111, iv, V, e/I 2. Occupancy Group A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J Div. 1, 2, 3, 4, 3. Fire Zone 1 2 3 4 EXTERIOR STUDS INTERIOR STUDS ROOF RAFTERS BEARING WALLS 2x6 24" 8'0" 2x4 24" R'0„ see plan 2x6 24" 8'0" COVERING EXTERIOR_y/ /TlVlt system ROOF co (( gle INTERIOR WALLS drywal 1 REROOFING- FLUES FIREPLACE n /a yes KITCHEN FL. FURNACEcentr al WATER HEATntra FURNACE central GAS no OIL yes A - etk-ve Sy I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the above is correct and agree to comply with all City Ordinances and State Laws regull ng bui i g co 1 struction. Applican ,r. /0237 Remote readout water meter must be installed inside building with digital readout mounted on exterior of building where readily available for reading. ?_5Lcv'O' Approved: CHIEF BUILDING OFFICAL By: ".,_ /G — �4�,eo� 3NI1 A1H3dOHd PLOT PLAN SETBACK STREET ZONING DISTRICT PLANNING & ZONING INFO. TYPE OF OCCUPANCY NUMBER OF STORIES TOTAL HT. AREA OF LOT �,A - FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM PRO'. LINE Fic SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM PROP. LINETrj��) / //h�� REAR YARD / 77 `K -C `Approved: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR %Zi,6c By- BUILDING DEPARTMENT — CITY / BOROUGH OF KODIAK Building E BUILDING ADDRESS Applicant to fill in between he2iuy lipe . 2F3 'WooL CiRcLI CLASS OF WORK NEW X DEMOLISH LOCALITY • Ka.diak A1aka S»bciiv_ NEAREST CROSS ST. w Z 0 Woody Way & Rezanof ALTERATION ADDITION REPAIR MOVE APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT AND CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY BUILDING PERMIT NO. USE OF BUILDING Housing NAME Kodiak Island Housing MAIL ADDRESS Box 197 SIZE OF BUILDING 76X88 HEIGHT 32 NO. OF ROOMS 64 NO. OF FLOORS 2 CITY Kodiak TEL. NO. 486 -5721 CHITECT .. .GINEER NAME Design Lab, Inc. NO. OF BUILDINGS 1 7 in project_ NO. OF BUILDINGS NOW ON LOT —0— VALUATION a 77334- DATE ISSUED LT A4� � a 7� BLDG. FEE • t z y2 �--� PLAN CHK. FEE TOTAL /6 79 37 BUILDING PLUMBING ELECTRIC NO. OF FAMILIES FOUNDATION ROUGH ROUGH ADDRESS 625 West 5th Avenue SIZE OF LOT see site plan FRAME SEPTIC TANK 'FINISH CITY Anchorage USE OF BLDG. NOW ON LOT n/a PLASTER SEWER FIXTURES SPECIFICATIONS FLUES GAS MOTORS • STATE LICENSE NO. 4455 -A FOUNDATION FINAL FINISH FINAL cc 0 0 U Z 0 U Tountain Pacific Co. MATERIAL EXTERIOR, PIERS ADDRESS 1617 So. Jackson St. WIDTH OF TOP WIDTH OF BOTTOM CITY Seattle DEPTH IN GROUND R.W. PLATE (SILL) STATE LICENSE NO. A -10001 5.1.1! 5111 2 1'6" 1 ' 611 3'6" 1'0" 2x6 AWWF SIZE SPA... SPAN SUBDIVISION Kadiak Alaska GIRDERS JOIST 1st. FL. JOIST 2nd. FL. LOT NO. BLK. Tracts B & E JOIST CEILING EXTERIOR STUDS see structur (varies `1 al 2x6 24" 8'0" DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE Type of Construction I, II, III, IV, V,0 2. Occupancy Group A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J Div. 1, 2, 3, 4, (g 1 3. Fire Zone 1 2 3 4 INTERIOR STUDS ROOF RAFTERS 2x4 see p 24" 8' 0" lan BEARING WALLS 2x6 24" 8' 0" COVERING I comp. EXTERIORatIV it systerhROOthingles INTERIOR WALLS clrywal 1 REROOFING FLUES FIREPLACE na/ FL. FURNwentra,l KITCHEN yes FURNACE central GAS no WATER HE@TrElititra 1 OIL yes Al7-DftfSVPtft I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the above is correct and agree to comply with all City Ordinances and State Laws regul ng bui con truction. . Applican Remote readout water meter must be installed inside building with digital readout mounted on exterior of building where readily available for reading. Approved: CHIEF B LDING OFFICAL By• ZONING DISTRICT 3N11 Al2d3dO2:1d PLOT PLAN 0 Q m f- w 3N11 A1H3dOiid STREET PLANNING & ZONING INFO. TYPE OF OCCUPANCY NUMBER OF STORIES AREA OF LOT FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM PR P. LI E TOTAL HT. v SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM PROP. LINE/ /6'• REAR YARD Approved: ZONINGADMINIST.L TOR /—r ''�15� By- BUILDING DEPARTMENT — CITY / BOROUG1.1-1.0EKODIAK Building F Applicant to fill in between heavy lines. CLASS OF WORK BUILDING ADDRESS 2.8/S wooDy CIRCLE °"AuTkadiak Alaska Subdiv. NEW ALTERATION DEMOLISH REPAIR CROSS ST. NEAREST . Woody Way Rezanof ADDITION MOVE APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT AND CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY UILDING PERMIT NO. 16E1?E4-- DATE ISSUED USE OF BUILDING Housing 0 Indiak Island Housing m0 L ADDRES5 Box 197 SIZE OF BUILDING 76x88 HEIGHT 32 NO. OF ROOMS 64 CITY Kodiak TEL. NO. 486-5721 NO. OF FLOORS 2 NO, OF BUILDINGS 1 7 NAME Design'Lab Inc. NO. OF BUILDINGS NOW ON LOT n project -0- VALUATION 677 3 3 11- BLDG. FEE citZ PLAN CHK. FEE /6)79 /6-1 7 37 Lil TOTAL BUILDING PLUMBING /079 ELECTRIC 37 NO. OF FAMILIES A6EnssWest 5th Avenue IZE OF LOT CITY Anchorage, AK OUNDATION ROUGH ROIJGH see site plan USE OF BLDG. NOW ON LOT n/a 'SPECIFICATIONS FRAME SEPTIC TANK FINISH PLASTER SEWER FIXTURES FLUES GAS MOTORS 0 0 STATE LICENSE NO. 4455-A Wuntain Pacific Co. ADDRESS So. Jackson St. FOUNDATION FINAL FINISH FINAL MATERIAL EXTERIOR, PIERS WIDTH OF TOP DTH OF BOTTOM 53.11 5111 It CITY Seattle STATE LICENSE NO. A 10001 DEPTH IN GROUND R.W. PLATE (SILL) 2x6 AWWF SIZE SPA.... 'O" SPAN SUBDIVISION Kadiak Alaska GIRDERS see OIST 1st FL. uctural JOIST 2nd. FL. LOT NO. Tract B & E BLK. OIST CEILING (varies DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE Typeof Construction I, 11,111, IV, V 2. Occupancy Group A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J Div. 1, 2, 3, 4, 3. Fire Zone 1 2 3 4 EXTERIOR STUDS INTERIOR STUDS ROOF RAFTERS - BEARING WALLS 2x6 2x4 see 2x6 COVERING 24 24" 0" plan 24" 8'0" ROOF comp. shingl REROOFING EXTERIVVALLS t systrAm drywall INTERIOR WALLS FLUE FIREPLACE FL, FURNACE KITCHEN yes FURNACE c ent ral ATER HEATE GAS e no olLyes hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the above is correct and agree to comply and State co struction. with all City Ordinances Laws regula \ng bui 'n cta Applicanteltik rett-re-e- F6 Remote readout readout water meter must be installed inside building with digital readout mounted on exterior of • building where readily available for reading. Approved: CHIEF BUILDING OFFICAL By ZONING DISTRICT, 2NI1 A.L?:13dOeid Mr A PLOT PLAN IjJ 3N11 Al2:13dOad STREET PLANNING & ZONING INFO. TYPE OF OCCUPANCY NUMBER OF STORIES AREA OF LOT FRONT YARD SETBA K FROM PRO N SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM PROP. LINE ISTRATOR /961-• REAR YARD BUILDING DEPARTMENT CITY / BOROUGH OF KODIAK Building G Applicant to fill in between heavy lines. UILDING ADDRESS S WO011Y CIRClE CLASS OF WORK APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT AND CERTIFICATE . OF OCCUPANCY NEW OCALIT Kadiak Alaska Subdiv. ALTERATION NEARESTS,BOSS ST Woody Way & Rezanof "ndiak Island Housing z 0 MAIL ADDRESS Rox 197 ADDITION - USE OF BUILDING SIZE OF BUILDING DEMOLISH R EPA I UILDING PERMIT NO. MOVE 36x80 DATE I SSUED VALUATION 0.4LC-41E HEIGHT 32 NO, OF ROOMS 15 ciOdiak 486-151721 NO. OF FLOORS 2 NO. OF BUILDINGS Z u NAME Design Lab. Inc. 1 7 in projeet NO. OF BUILDINGS NOW ON LOT —O- . BLDG. FEE/ PLAN CHK, FEE 6-68 s 3.c„z Oct) igEa. TOTAL 6-Kg 00 BUILDING PLUMBING ELECTRIC NO. OF FAMILIES -a- FOUNDATION ROUGH ROUGH ADDRESS 625 West h Avenue SIZE OF LOT CITY AnchoraPre AK STATE LICENSE NO. 0 z 0 see site plan 055 OF BLDG. NOW ON LOT SPECIFICATIONS n/a FRAME SEPTIC TANK FINISH PLASTER SEWER • FIXTURES FLUES GAS MOTORS 4455-A NAME Pacific Co. 107 So. Jackson St FOUNDATION FINAL FINISH FINAL MATERIAL WIDTH OF TOP TH OF BOTTO geattle DEPTH N GROUND R.W. PLATE (SILL) STATE LICENSE NO. A-10001 z 0 1- SUBDIVISION Kadiak Alaska EXTERIOR, 1 6" SIZE PIERS 5_10-t1 Btt '0" SPAN GIRDERS OIST 1st. FL, JOIST 2nd. FL. LOT NO. BLK. act B & E JOIST CEILING st (v uctn-al -ri e. EXTERIOR STUDS - 2x6 24" 8 0" DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE `Type of Construction I, 11, 111, IV, V, 2. Occupancy Group A, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J Div. 1, 2, 3, 4, 3. Fire Zone 1 2 3 4 INTERIOR STUDS ROOF RAFTERS BEARING WALLS 2x4 see 2x6 COVERING 24" 1 a:n 24" 0"' ExTERIoRHiTit sysLeib ROOF INTERIOR WALLS drywall FLUES 8'"0" comp shingl REROOFING FIREPLACE n a FL. FURNACEcen KITCHEN FURNACE central WATER HEAT n GAS OIL no yes 1 hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the above is correct and agree to comply with all City Ordinances and State Laws regu ting bi44ipg constr n. Applicarct .5=stv IP -g Remote readout water meter must be installed inside building with digital readout mounted on exterior of building where readily available for reading. Co7r1^ 0.1" -CeS es Approve • CHI EF BUil WING Off ICAL zetc, By: 3NI1 A_Lei3d0Hd S. PLOT PLAN SETBACK 2N11 A.LH3c10Hd STREET PLANNING & ZONING INFO. ZONING DISTRICT TYPE OF OCCUPANCY NUMBER OF STORIES AREA OF LOT TOTAL HT. FRONT YARD SETB K FROM PR INE SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM PROP. LINE .5- REAR YARD 77; Approved: ZONING ADMINISTRATORZ- By 21,1:161. Gertifirate Mrrupiatirg p.epartnterti af 7guittring (70 neprtion This Certificate issued pursuant to the requirements of Section 306 of the Uniform Building Code certifying that at the time of issuance this structure was in compliance with the various ordinances of the City regulating building construction or use. For the following: Use Classification Office Bld. Permit No. 497 Group B Type Construction VN Fire Zone Use Zone Owner of Building Kodiak. Islan_ Building Address 2_8 2..5_Woody C Bryce W. Gordon Building Official 2atta-SCZNI,VNMILIM'A*4 .,tU.':•Il• '• • .n^aStusL• $SFI^.•.nt.sa: wyzll'1;aiktshlw, tans• 3•: a.' L• mrva, Pdp. n,,;.••• •r...:r..z.'.a•ATuidzgays;.+A'L swa cat..,utime,S•..�•+r„- .nr.S•S •hF�•±��T•t+ Certificate of trill:tat-mg Peparttnent of 7,guilbing ;inspection This Certificate issued pursuant to the requirements of Section 306 of the Uniform Building Code certifying that at the time of issuance this structure was in compliance with the various ordinances of the City regulating building construction or use. For the following: Use Classification . Re i ri n t- i a 1 Bldg. Permit No. a g 6 Group R1.— Type Construction Fire Zone Owner of Building Gland 1 ousinrj Address .—Box 197 Building Address 28.15Wand -y-- C- i.rr –le - 1314g -.—F Locality I3ryr•e _W __Gnrr1on By' Building Official Date: July 28, 1 9_83_ " 'N-nrattat Certificate of Mrtupanrg Peparfinnit of 4 uittring :Inspintiort This Certificate issued pursuant to the requirements of Section 306 of the Uniform Building Code certifying that at the time of issuance this structure was in compliance with the various ordinances of the City regulating building construction or use. For the following: Bldg. Permit No. Owner of Building Kodiak Island Housing Addres Building Address 2835 Woody ri re. le Bldg_ i Locality 4,7:4TATMML.E.4.s: h., P.... Phrtin & Printina Kodiak. Alaska. `3.1.353'7,9%, Vr.b.virk ,,F,"'W.I.ValVelakOZEITaYr^ ,"'"41,761.17,111M.WITeU.6.47N6.46WW,Wovnots■rwouvokaale-Avive,,,,,..,,ti,,,wy,..^ Certificate as rupartrg Pepartment of 7guittit4 ;4nel:rectum This Certificate issued pursuant to the requirements of Section 306 of the Uniform Building Code certifying that at the time of issuance this structure was in compliance with the various ordinances of the City regulating bui!din9 • construction or use. For the following: Use Classification IResiclpntial Bldg. Permit No. 494 Group 2.1_ Type Construction ._v_N Fire Zone Owner of Building KocLiak_Lsa.and_Ho.usIng Address —Box 13 Building Address 2845--WoG4y—C • la Bldg. D Locality W.—. Gordon Building Official Date: Jnly 28, 1 9S 11. • MT •QtAAY • 44.4.7. 3S:45417■11. 'r',..401'4`0,..V1142,21=skwkkraptr,...5.evo. 4. layraordlZaWask7M4eAraOltz••• • ••• • • '''•• •• • • •• • • • • ' • • v•I'S (Certificate of crupancg Pelmet/tent uf 7..guittring Pinsinction • This Certificate issued pursuant to the requirements of Section 306 of the Uniform Building Code certifying that at the time of issuance this structure was in compliance with the various ordinances of the City regulating building 1 construction or use. For the following: Group RI Type Construction ‘,3 Br Bi ■• .7,Mri'ag•17. m • •,`PM.'ntS711 MIMS, • • • , •:••1.4•,•MI,•23,..,M17•1`:),•rek •••••••/,.•MZ, •MI:01.4k • • • .n..1, ••• Designed and printed by Page Photo & Printing, Kodiak, Alaska. Certifirate crupanrg Pei:rat-fluent of uilbing Phispertion This Certificate issued pursuant to the requirements of Section 306 of the Uniform Building Code certifying that at the time of issuance this structure was in compliance with the various ordinances of the City regulating building construction or use. For the following: Use Classification _Residential Bldg. Permit No. Owner of Building Kodiak_islan.d_liausinsg___+ Address Rnx Building Address 21175 Wo.odyi_Circle_131dg.BLocality Bcei. Gordon By- Building Official Dat: Past In A Conspicuous Place tr4,,74,1,4%. . Tr* .,AVNZVFP • • ' "ileb:c. • Vilkik.SleitAiv"A",m•iwAll. • ' Certifirate of trupartrg P.epartittent of Puiltring Plitevertion This Certificate issued pursuant to the requirements of Section 306 of the Uniform Building Code certifying that at the time of issuance this structure was in compliance with the various ordinances of the City regulating building construction or use. For the following-: Use Classification Bldg. Permit No. 491 Group. R1, Type Construction __AZ N Fire Zone - Use Zone R2 - Owner of Building Kcicliak Island Housing Box 1 97 Building Address 28H S woody Circle alcig.A_ Locality Bryce W. Gordon Building Official Date: July 28, 1983 Post In A Conspicuous Place Designed and printed by Page Photo & Printing, kodiak, Alaska. September 8, 1982 Mr. Marlin Knight Kodiak Island Housing Authority P.O. Box 172 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 SUBJECT: Proposed Water 6 Sewer Improvements Your Project AK-02 P013-011 Dear Marlin: The water system improvements shown on sheet C-6 of the plan profile drawings of the subject project are approved except as follows: 1. Provide an 8"x8" "T" at the point where the 8-inch ductile iron pipe turns off Woody Way onto Woody Circle. We would pre- fer an 8-inch butterfly valve be installed on the dead end side of this "T". At such time as the main is extended in the future, pipe can be connected to the valve without interupting service to the low income housing development. If constructed as shown with a 90° elbow, it would be necessary to remove the elbow and install a "T". This would require shutting the main down and would result in an interruption to the water service of at least a full day. 2. It is proposed to install a master meter for the development at the entrance to the property. This will require an accessible structure able to .withstand traffic. A, standard manhole structure will be acceptable. We would Consider such alternate proposals as you might wish to offer for a structure to house the water meter. The details of the sewer system we understand are being revised with designs being prepared by URS Engineers. As these designs become available, we will review them and comment. Please contact us for any questions you might have. cerel Larry Mon e City Engineer LKM/ak cc: Dave Crowes.Borough Engineer POST OFFICE BOA 1397. 140DIR • ALASKA 99615 PHONE (907) 486-32(24 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH MEMORANDUM DATE: September 2, 1982 TO: Bryce W. Gordon, Building Official FROM: Davi'd C. Crowe, Borough Engineer SUBJECT: Building Permits, Kodiak Island Housing Authority Low-Cost Housing Project When | read City Engineer Larry Monroe's (undated) letter to KIHA, copy received here August 27, | noted that he had approved only Drawings C-2 and C-3 which deal with road and drainage improvements' I called Mr. Monroe this morning and asked that he review the utility plans on Drawing C-6 andLg{va us a letter of approval. Please make sure that we have that letter of approval before issuing the building permit or that a notation is included on each permit indicating that it is being issued subject to approval of utility plans by the City of Kodiak. cc: Ann Moen b/ ommUnity Development Department (Case File) c , , ' :, / \ k .',.. ; 7....). -. LI i d i ' f 1 11 rl 1 f i ii7J 1,01 3 t 1. \ - 's-, \ r \ I 8 1 i'. .....— -I il `,-?) \..Lr-1.1 DEPT. OF ENVIIMONTUENTAL .CONSERIATKON r`l SOUTHCEIciTRALREakMaOf-H,E Project No C B File. Job File - Construction Other. 82 \.„6.0NOL ve0 Design Lab Inc. 625.W. 5th Avenue Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Dear Sir: -8 EP JAY S. HAMMOND, GOVERNOR 437 E. Street SECOND FLOOR ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99501 (907) 274-2533 P.O. BOX 515 KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 (907) 486-3350 P.O. BOX 1207 SOLDOTNA, ALASKA 99669 (907) 262-5210 P.O. BOX 1709 VALDEZ, ALASKA 99686 (907) 835-4698 P.O. BOX 1064 WASILLA, ALASKA 99687 (907) 376-5038 Subject: Kodiak Island Housing Authority Low Income Housing Water & Sewer Improvements 8321—FA-082 and 8321—DA-044 We have reviewed the plans and specifications for the subject project. The project is hereby approved for construction for the items with which this Department is concerned. This letter constitutes the permit required by A.S. 46.03.720(a) for approval of sewerage systems. Enclosed with this letter is a "Certificate to Construct" for the drinking water system. The "Approval to Operate" section of the certificate must be completed by a representative of this Department prior to placing the system in operation. BEE/msm Enclosure 3-09 LH Sine ely, Q Bruce E. Erickson Environmental Engineer Kodiak island Borenigh Engineering Department RECEIVED SEP - 8 1982 AM PM 7181,911,01114.2111218i41516 SEP 8 198 CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION CERTIFICATE ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION. PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT Plans for the construction of ":") 12 1 L 4 itirj /1 0./401,71/6 •-t C4T T y iP blic water system located in v • t"- • , Alaska, submitted in accordance with 18 RAC 80.100 by T) tS T, fi; . have been reviewed 'and are 0 , approved. 0, conditionally approved (see attached conditions). • 1,4.7 1.? E "-41?).4 7.-t6'``) .4-:-.*: (');4-E-Air(1- sLie'i--, .igrr 4; i2: 6 S'e: t,'"..:31t-: IZ I tj ';;''' f ,, . . .,..,,, -,-' , ,t ...- ,`,,t.`:.■ ..-J ''''''''''' C:71illije AVLit, '.- -3.,:1£4( ''.-r- t .. .. , : - „. TITLE DATE If construction has not started within two years of the approval date, this certificate is void and new plans and specifications must be submitted for review and approval before construction. APPROVED CHANGE ORDERS • • Change (contract order no. or descriptive reference) Approved by Date The "APPROVAL TO OPERATE" section must be completed before any water is made available to the public. APPROVAL TO OPERATE The construction of the public water system was completed on (date). The system is hereby granted interim approval to operate for 90 days following the completion date. BY TITLE, DATE As-built plans submitted during the interim approval period, or an inspection by the Department has confirmed the system was constructed according to the approved plans. The system is hereby granted final approval to operate. TITLE KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH August 12, 1982 Mr. Lou Garrett Department of Transportation Box 1396 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Dear Mr. Garrett, Telephones 486 -5736 - 486 -5737 — Box 1246 KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 The Kodiak Island Housing Authority recently began construction of the Woody May portion of its project.' The Planning and Zoning Commission is concerned about the vehicle safety problems which will result because of the Woody Way intersection on the'Rezanof Curve. Is there anything which can be done to reduce this obvious hazard? .Would a right turn only be possible? A third traffic lane? A Dangerous Intersection Ahead sign? We look forward to hearing from you on this matter. Sincerely, Uv�u�t✓ Gam-- Virginia Crowe Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission CC: KIHA KO 3I IAK ISLAND BOROUGH March 19, 1982 Telephones 486 -5736 - 486 -5737 — Box 1246 KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 Mr. Marlin Knight Executive Director Kodiak Island Housing Authority Box 197 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Dear Marlin, Please be advised that the Planning and Zoning Commission, at its March 17, 1982 meeting, approved the site plan and con- ditions for the Authority's project on Tracts B and E, Kadiak Alaska Subdivision. Should you have any questions on this matter do not hesitate to contact us at 486 -5736. Sincerely, William A. Walton Community Development Department Director CC: Walt Ebell Case File Z -81 -010 WAW /jmj 1 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES March 17, 1982, regular. meeting Page 6 Mr. .Walt Ebell Representing Brechan Enterprises. Brechan Enterprises is willing t withdraw their application to lease or purchase Tracts B -3 and B -4A, if the Mater: Sales Contract Outline is forwarded on to:the Manager for his consideration and then forwarded to the Assembly. Mrs. Crowe called a5 minute recess at 10:15 p.m.. The meeting was called back to order at 10:20 p.m. Mr. Ramaglia provisions to maintain haul road, and who is to maintain it? Discussion between the Commission members on who should maintain the haul road. Mr. Gudenau let the Borough Assembly decide who is going to pay for the maintenanc of the road. Discussion on amendments to Resolution 82 -009. Mr. Gudenau read Resolution 82 -009 with the amendments. Mr. Gudenau moved to approve Resolution 82 -009 with amendments. Seconded by Mr. Ball. Motion PASSED by unanimous roll call vote. Mrs. Crowe the next item is the Material Sales Contract Outline. Lengthy discusstion between the Commission members, Walt Ebell, Jim Cobis, Bruce Maass and Glen Mathis on_changes to be made to_the_contract outline. _ Mr. Hill moved to make the following change to the Material Sales Contract Outline Page 1, Section 1 - delete the word "_only" at the end of the sentence and add the words "from this parcel only ". Seconded by Mr. Ball. Motion PASSED by unanimous roll call vote. Mr. Ball moved to make the following changes to the Material Sales Contract Outiir (1) Page 1, Section 4 - in the third line, add the word "useable" between "the" ar "gravel resource" so the end of the sentence reads "until the useable gravel re- source is extracted, whichever occurs first" and (2) Page 4, Section 24 - add subsection e. which reads "Failure to occupy or perform according to the terms of this contract for a twelve (12) month period constitutes a default." Seconded by Mr. Hill. Motion PASSED by unanimous roll call vote. Mr. Ramaglia moved to make the following change to the Material Sales Contract: Page 2, Section 11 - change the sentence to read "hours of operation shall be limited to 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday." Seconded by Mrs. Strickert. Motion PASSED with a 4 -2 vote with Mrs. Crowe and Mr. Ball voting NO and Mr. Hill, Mr. Ramaglia, Mrs. Strickert and Mr. Gudenau voting YES. Mr. Ball moved to make the following change to the Material Sales Contract: Page 2, Section.12 - add a sentence on the end of the existing sentence which reads "haul road will remain open and be maintained during the term of the contrac Seconded by Mr. Hill. Motion PASSED with a 5 -1 vote, Mrs. Strickert voted NO and Mr. Ball, Mrs. Crowe, Mr. Hill, Mr. Ramaglia and Mr. Gudenau voted YES. Mrs. Strickert moved to approve the Material Sales Contract Outline with the amendments stated and pass it on to the Borough Assembly for their April meetino. Seconded by Mr. Ball. Motion PASSED by unanimous roll,call vote. 11. CONSIDERATION OF CASE Z -81 -010. Kodiak Island Housing Authority Site plan revie.,r. (Kodiak Island Housing Authority) Mrs. Crowe summarized the three (3) handouts provided by the Community Developmen: Department and-the Engineering Department. Mr. Ebell explained that money was set aside for the Kodiak Island Housing Author- ity's fair share of improvements to Woody Circle. The money will only be set aside for 15 years. Discussion on what happens to the money after the 15 years are up. Mr. Ebell explained the proposed site plan. Mr. Hill moved to approve the site plan for the Kodiak Island Housing Authority's project on Tracts B and E, Kadiak Alaska Subdivision, as all of the conditions have been met. Seconded by Mr. Gudenau. Motion PASSED by unanimous roll call vote. = '' . KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES March 17, 1982, regular meeting Page 5 Discussion on practical access to the lots in question. Mr. Ramaglia the Engineer recommends that more work be done on Lilly Way. Discussion on providing access to lots being subdivided. Mrs. Strickert moved to grant preliminary approval to Tract I, USS 1396, and lots 1 through 5, block 4, lots 8 through 15. block 5 and lot 1 and 2, block 6, Elderberry Heights Subdivision. Seconded by Mr. Hill' Motion PASSED by unanimous roll call vote. Mr. Grothe *tate6that he made it clear to Mr. Crowe that either all of this be approved ur.it be returned with corrections to be made. 'Mr. Gudenau can this be reconsidered now? Mr. Walton yes. Mr. Ball moved to reconsider the preliminary subdivision of the unsubdivided port- ion of USS I396' creating blocks 4, 5. 6 and 7, Elderberry Heights Subdivision. Seconded by Mr. Hill. Mrs. Crowe reconsider it now? Br. Ball yes! - _-- , `—'_' --`__-- _ Motion PASSED with a4-2 vote with Mrs. Crowe and Mrs. Strickert voting NO and Mr. Ball, Mc. Hill, Mr. Gudenau and Mr. Ramaglia voting YES. Lenghty discussion between the Commission members and Mr. Orothe.on what the lot configurations are going to be. Mr. Walton a portion of State Law states that the Commission can approve or dis- approve the plat submitted or return it to the applicant for modification or correction. More disucssion on lot configuration and changing the lot configuration of Tract I so that the lines are straight. Mr. Hill can we grant preliminary subdivision approval, then Mr. Grothe can retur this to us with all of the stipulations met. Mr. Hill moved to grant preliminary approval of the unsubdivided portion of USS 1390, creating blocks 4, 5, 6, and 7, Elderberry Heights Subdivision into 32 lots with the following stipulation: that the southeast boundary of Tract I be stra1gh ened. Seconded by Mr. Gudenau. Motion PASSED by unanimous roll call vote. Discussion on whether or not a replat needs to be done on these small land trans- fers 9. PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE S-82-000. (Preliminary)vacation of lots 4B, 4C and 4D, bTo 2, Bells Flats Alaska Subdivision; and replat to lots 4D-1, 48-2, 4B-3 and 4B-4, block 2, Bells Flats Alaska Subdivision. (William G. Williams) Mrs. Crowe closed the regular meeting and opened the public hearing, hearing comments Mrs. Crowe closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting. Mr. Gudenau moved to grant a preliminary vacation of lots 4B, 4C, md 40. block 2, Bells Flats Alaska Subdivision and replat to lots 48-1, 4B-2, 4B-3 and 4B-4, block 2, Bells Flats Alaska Subdivision. Seconded by Mrs. Strickert. Motion FAILED by unanimous roll call vote. REASONS FOR DENIAL: ' 1. Lot 4B-3 does not meet the average lot width of 120 feet; and 2.. None of the new lot lines run radially with the right-of-way for Birch Circle as required by Code Section 16,20.050(D). 10. CONSIDERATION OF CASE 82-009. A request for sale or lease of Tracts 13-3. and a-4A Bells Flats Alaska Subdivision, USS 2539. (Brechan Enterprises) STAFF REPORT: Mr. Walton presented the staff report based on a memorandum prepar by the ammunity Development Department. ;.; • v. 41,:r. to FAIR SHARE AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this,717_thTddy.76-E.Mgi-ohiSS2-; by and between Kodiak :Island Borough, hereinafter "KIB", and Kodiak ,Island Housing Authority, hereinafter "KIHA": WHEREAS, KIHA purchased Tracts B and E, Kadiak Alaska ,Subdivision, Kodiak Recording District, Third Judicial District, State of Alaska, from KIB for the. specific purpose of constructing! a low rent housing. project; ,WHEREAS, KIHA was granted an exception for additional use in a R-2 District for the above described property by KIB upon certainconditions; WHEREAS, one of said conditions requires that KIHA agree to pay a fair share of the development costs of Woody'Cir- . cle, a roadway platted between Tracts B and E. WHEREAS, an estimate of said development cost has been prepared by a licensed civil engineer; WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to a formula to deter- mine the fair share of said development cost to be paid by KIHA; WHEREAS, the parties-desire to set aside the'monies to be paid by KIHA so that said monies will be available if meaded, _ and to provide for the release of said monies if not needed; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and the mutual covenants of the-parties hereto, and for other good land.valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency is hereby expressly acknowledged and confessed, the parties agree as follows: • 1. The fair share to be paid by KIHA is $13,975.00. 2% After issuance of the building permit. for the housing 1 project but prior to the issuance-of the certificate of occupancy for the housing project, KIRA-shall purchase a time certificate(s) of deposit, or other certificate as mutually agreed to by the par- ties, for the above stated amount naming KIB and KIHA as joint signature to negotiate said of which owners and requiring both parties' certificate(s). 3. All interest earned from time to time on said certifi- cate(s) shall be reinvested as principal and shall be subject to the provisions of this agreement. 4. At such time as Woody Circle is developed all of said monies, including interest, shall be released to KIB to .pay for a portion of the development costs. Such payment shall release KIHA from any further obligation to pay for the development of Woody Circle. 5. However, if Woody Circle is not developed within fifteen j? (15) years from the date of this agreement or if Tracts B and E, Kadiak Alaska Subdivision, Kodiak 'Recording District, Third Judi- I. cial District, State of Alaska are annexed to the City of Kodiak, said monies, including interest, shall be returned to KIHA and KIHA shall be released' from any obligation to pay for the develop- ment of Woody Circle except as provided by law. 6. Upon the execution of this agreement KIB shall consider k the condition requiring ":IRA (sic) to agree to pay the fair share of Woody Circle improvements when necessary to open access to ad- i` jacent property" to be satisfied. 7. The terms and conditions hereof shall be binding upon f 1111 and inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective suc- cessors and assigns. 8. This agreement may not be amended or supplemented except by a writing signed by all of the parties hereto. 9. This writing is the entire, full and complete agreement of the parties pertaining to the fair share agreement, and super- sedes and replaces all written and oral agreements heretofore made or existing by and between the parties or their representa- tives insofar as the fair share agreement is concerned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this agree ment to be executed on the day and year first above written. Kodiak Island Borough By: Kodiak Island Housing Authority 7, Marlin Kn_igt, xecutjve Dir. CONSULTING ENGINEER P. 0. Box 375 Kodiak, Alaska (907) 486-4181 Kodiak Island Borough Kodiak, Alaska RECEIVED MAR 1 7 P14, Kodiak Housing Authority Kodiak, Alaska Re: Low Rent Public Housing Attached is the estimate of cost to construct a gravel residential street to City of Kodiak standards for the portion of the street which remains undeveloped after com- pletion of your project. These costs are based on recently developed projects within the Kodiak area. ROLLAND A. JONES Consulting leer P. O. Bo KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 .A./t3— • -- • SHEE T NO.- OF CALCULATED DY DATE 1 CHECKED BY DATE SCALE gd ir7 : r.-7,q; C7rtt b,17/qc7 $(.) /sA;t7OP 46- e-*/ - 4a/a /or.) //,ZaeY /6 ra.ot7 • /r7: • 3;. • • • . , • • . • • • • • • , • • • • ; . 3 • • • • • • • • • 33 • • FORM 204 Available Iro INC TOwnaend,Mass 01469 - _ - ' • •• KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH MEMORANDUM DATE: March 17, 1982 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Community Development Department SUBJ: Information for March 17, 1982 meeting RE: Kodiak Island Housing Authority project Please be advised that the Borough Manager approved the terms of a "fair share" agreement on March 17, 1982. The attorney for KIHA is preparing the required documents for submission to the Manager. KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH MEMORANDUM DATE: March 16, 1982 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Community Development Department WW/144224iiv SUBJ: Information for March 17, 1982 meeting RE: Kodiak Island Housing Authority project The question of when the Housing Authority's site plan was first presented to the Commission was raised during the March 10, 1982 work session. The preliminary site plan was received on April 30, 1981 and presented to the Commission at its May 13, 1981 agenda review work session. It was at that point in time that staff noted a deficiency in the amount of off-street parking spaces, requested an additional tot lot, and suggested the original six conditions. The question of compliance with zoning code yard setbacks was also raised at the Commission's March 10, 1982 work session. Be advised that the setbacks shown on Sheet A-1 of the plans prepared by Design Lab, Inc. of Anchorage, meet or exceed the requirements contained in Title 17. KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ME'MORANDUM DATE: March 12, 1982 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: David C. Crowe, Borough Engineer .044a SUBJECT: Kodiak Island Housing Authority, Low Income Housing, Site and Utility Plan Review Mr. Marlin Knight submitted copies of the final site and utility plans to me for review yesterday morning. As I have mentioned during previous work sessions, I do not feel that the proposed entrances to the parking lots are properly laid out to provide adequate safety precautions. The proposed exit from the south parking lot is located only 52 feet from Woody Way and presents a possible conflict between vehicles exiting this parking lot and vehicles turning off Woody Way to enter the north parking lot. The proposed exit from the north parking lot is designed for traffic to enter Woody Circle at a 45° angle. While this does not create a hazard until Woody Circle is fully developed, I feel that the potential problem should be dealt with under the initial construction program rather than involving reconstruction of the parking lot approach at some future time. I would recommend that the south parking lot entrance/ exit be from Woody Way, and that the north parking lot entrance/ exit be redesigned to enter Woody Circle at a 90° angle. Both these revisions are shown in red on Sheet No. 1 of 6. I have also shown two additional culverts which should be installed,:.shown in red on,this same sheet. The first is required under the alternate approach to the south parking lot, and the second should be installed to limit reconstruction work at the north parking lot approach when Woody Circle is developed. ( KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH MEMORANDUM KIHA Low Income Housing, Site and Utility Plan Review Page 2 Sewer construction on the initial phase will be limited to the area from Station 25 4- 50, as shown on Sheet No. 6 of 6, into the site. Other than the above comments, I see no other items with which to take exception. I contacted the City Engineer yesterday afternoon to inquire whether copies of the road and utilities plans had been submitted for City approval, and was told that he had not yet seen any plans. He will forward his comments after receipt and review of the plans. KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH MEMORAND•M DATE: March 11, 1982 TO: Philip C. Shealy, Borough Manager FROM: David C. Crowe, Borough Engineer SUBJECT: Woody Circle Estimated Construction Costs The following is my estimate of what it would cost to design and construct the portion of Woody Circle which will not be constructed by Kodiak Island Housing Authority: Unclassified Excavation 2100 c.y. @ $16.50 $ 34,650 Rockfill 3000 ton @ $23.00 69,000 Basecourse 360 ton @ $27.50 9,900 Clearing and Grubbing 2,000 $115,550 Engineering, Design, and Administration 10,000 Total $ 125,55U If Kodiak Island Housing Authority were to pay 73 percent of the costs, as mentioned by Marlin Knight during our meeting on Monday afternoon, their share would be $91,651.50, If the method of determining assessments which is used by the City of Kodiak is used, the Housing Authority's share would be $81,609., or 65 percent of the total cost. This was determined by the following calculations: Frontage Area 40% $ 50,220 KIHA 473 L.F., 76,54% $38,437 Lutheran Church 145 L.F., 23.46$ 11,783 618 L.F. $50,220 60% $v 75,330 KIHA 170,592 s.f., 57.31% $43,172 Lutheran Ch,'127,067 s.f. 42,69% 32,158 297,659 s.f. $75,330 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH MEMORANDUM Woody Circle Estimated Construction Costs March 11, 1982 - Page 2 These costs are predicated on the Housing Authority's installing two additional culverts which would ultimately need to be installed under asphalt paving. 7 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH MEMORAkDUM DATE: March 10, 1982 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Community Development Department 4/-414Vt4k., SUBJ: Staff report for March 17, 1982 meeting RE: Kodiak Island Housing Authority Conditions HISTORY On July 2, 1981 the Borough Assembly reversed a previous Commission decision and granted an exception to the Kodiak Island Housing Authority to construct a 48 unit housing project on Tracts B and E, Kadiak Alaska Subdivision, with eight conditions: 1. Property to be annexed to the City of Kodiak; 2. Site plan be revised to show 96 off-street parking stalls, to indicate handicapped parking stalls, to indicate the location of handicapped access ramps, to include an additional "tot lot", and to be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission; 3. Site plan for each "tot lot" be prepared indicating sur- face material, type and location of play equipment and size to be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission; 4. A timetable to be prepared for the Planning and Zoning Commission on the construction of the community facilities; 5. Grading, drainage and erosion plan be approved by the City Engineer; 6. Security and exterior lighting system to be reviewed by the Kodiak Police Department; 7. HRA to agree to pay the fair share of Woody Circle improvements when necessary to open access to adjacent property; and 8. Cut Woody Way off from Murphy Street extended. KODIAK ISLANDr1SING AUTHORITY Page 3 Comments: The Kodiak Police Department reviewed the security and exterior lighting system on March 8, 1982 and approved same (See attached letter). 7. HRA to agree to pay the fair share of Woody Circle improvements when necessary to open access to adjacent property; and Comments: The Housing Authority has agreed to pay its fair share of any costs 'associated with the construction of Woody Circle. Present staff and authority discussions center on the methodology to be used. Assessment systems from Anchorage and Kodiak are being reviewed. Staff efforts on this condition were more clearly defined at a recent work session when an Assemblyman stated "staff is to work out the fair share details and amounts and the Manager will present it to the Assembly for consideration." 8. .Cut Woody Way off from Murphy Street extended. Comments: On the Housing Authority's site plan Woody Way does not extend past Woody Circle. The enforcement of this condition is with the City of Kodiak as Woody Way is in the City, not the Borough. SUMMARY Eight conditions were attached to the original approval of this project. Seven remain due to a recent Assembly action. Of the seven conditions remaining, only 2, 3 and 4 are the responsiblity of the Commission for review and approval. #2 - the site plan has been revised to show more facilities than requested in the condition; #3 - the "tot lot" site plans have been prepared to show the data requested; and. #4 - the community building timetable is not needed as the entire project will be constructed in one phase. BUILDING PERMIT A building permit for this project cannot be issued by the Building Official until certification is received from the Zoning Officer or the Director of Community Development that the conditions have been satisfied. At this point in time conditions 4, 6., and 8 are satisfied. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the site plan and tot lot plans for the Kodiak Island Housing Authority project on Tracts B and E, Kadiak Alaska Subdivision, as the revisions requested have been provided. Kodiak. Island ';;ing Authority Page 2 The Commission is responsible for conditions 2, 3, 4, and 5. The remaining four conditions are to be dealt with by other persons or parties. Action to date and staff comments on each condition follow: 1.. Property be annexed to the City of Kodiak; Comments: This condition was removed by the Borough Assembly at its February 4, 1982 meeting. 2. Site plan be revised to show 96 off - street parking stalls, to indicate handicapped parking stalls, to indicate the location of handicapped access ramps, to include an additional "tot lot ", and to be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission; Comments: The site plan has been revised. 105 off - street parking spaces are shown where 96 are required. Five (5) spaces are provided and marked for handicapped individuals. Handicapped access ramps are shown on the plan. Four (4) "tot lots" are shown as opposed to the two which were required. The site plan has been viewed by the Commission on several occasions. It shows six (6) structures con- taining 48 dwelling units, a community building, more than code required off- street parking spaces, handicapped parking spaces and ramps, 25 foot wide access driveways to the units, dumpster locations, storage units, sidewalks, four (4) play areas, fire lanes, buried fuel oil tanks (2) and open space. 3. Site plan for each "tot lot" be prepared indicating surface material, type and location of play .equipment_; and size to be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission Comments: Four (4) play areas have been indicated which contain 1,400, 1,200, 590, and 400 square feet respectively. They are located strategically between the dwelling units and adjacent to the community building. The surface material on each play area will be wood chips. The play equipment will consist of climbing structures, slides and rope -plank bridges. 4. A timetable be prepared for the Planning and Zoning Commission on the construction of the community facilities; Comments: This condition was satified on February 15, 1982 through the Housing Authority's letter which stated "In regards to the community facility, that building will not be "phased" as originally stated, but rather will be included in the contract documents and bid with the total project. Construction of this building will be completed simultaneously with the rest of the buildings and will be completed at the same time." 5. Grading, drainage, and erosion plan be approved by the City Engineer; Comments: Engineer stamped plans have been presented to the Borough Engineer for review and approval. 6. Security and exterior lighting system be reviewed by the Kodiak Police Department; KODIAK POLICE DEPARTMENT 789 MAR 1982 RECEIVED „ P.O. Box 509 Kodiak, Alaska 99615-0509 Phone: (907) 486-3221 Marlin Knight,.Executive,Director Kodiak Island Housing Authority P.O. Box 197 Kodiak, AK 99615 Dear Mr. Knight, March 8, 1982. dir Kodiak James T. Hasty Chief of Police Persuant to your request, I have:reviewed the security and exterior lighting system as required by the Borough Assembly.for your 48 unit, low-rent project on Tracts B and E, Kadiak Alaska Subdivision. In reviewing the security and exterior lighting system, we find it to be satisfactory for the purpose intended. Accordingly, this letter acknowledges that item six of the letter dated July 10, 1981 by the Borough Manager to Mr-. Tom Azumbrado has been met. Sincerely, A1di e Howard Acting Police ,thief r.r4pN'rpcCPY� <frse7Uvitsor'to t4 '4 28¢ ?'10 ° . 2. e p i 018 via 5�89�0� ,'' r 11AR 1982 RECBVEO 5 sit•''. 14 5- 4- *eo e 11 10 -r? iSc' 4-toet 690 .6C zolowS L AC c7N 6 254-y250 6t0 ... &PAO -c, 5-2E7 t a 1 6) 4-67qic WO 54v, c*I" .2 5 4____ T...- ..„._ ,o) artafeicr 00P )/etc(*. e--$37, te...VrtAvisPt>/e7 te7v9tst L-4005, t...aNCri+ • •c't t'ci— • (e05° — 2.'771 -7erg3 ).; 5Z) l(pSj° 2. < ' 2.s() 11-0 z..370110(3%)(izo g43-4o 3-01 1-SZ ,\CC3 i'a t4o • be F.. t--ci • il 0 lz., Ir1-702-• --..t. A 1 ti-0 g-- =2,b40-,zst,57 Hog : i 7o K A 300 'dr • --l- Z.Siz,s1,s7 y... .44-(v --r- 1301731 . 14- 41174(a , "71 ir 11-0 M514}1-4-.2V:A_ A. )( 4ea , 0184, 55 2.e2t•te 541, 050,13 t(Oz- 11142z,21=A eoz (psi/cps-147 Ar ,is-x Ito 29105Ye. /DNE / 700•07 45- 4-11S+ • 25-) e77. 1O 150z A 1 30. 05; ksieeer- qsatile, 2S1 231.5 7 X 3a0 = �J,277, oz ,1Z 20KE 3 11 IX02= I13 'H-, .3 05,18. �' 360'9 .1z- , 12_ 12- ia-r26-pr A -.7 gel ?a *s 2 r 1 102- =,0,. = 1 I0 14-22(21 x -- b- ICPl zS 4_, Co X140 r l 3(0 i 6 ( 11A 04(/ 4--74-176- : 51'15, ?S 3701 / r-Acl' 15 — x 2...4.16'671, k s, t 7, = 61-7$ 4.. 5.3 ?-0145 3 1 s A- 16-*/2.0491ZI Z»4Z. >eA 44: egytez-ki-- 4-14-7'1, 01- •- zoNt e- • orx/i/xit 1,4-4 I e,e777,08 3 1,,,Oo 1141--?<Pc IZ5 ocIDO /6de-6/ZS 600114+7 Bsil o LILe12#1s1/1 14. A V: 3(4t KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH February 22, 1982 Gearry Gordon, Director of Housing Department of Housing and Urban Development Anchorage Area Office 701 C Street, Box 64 Anchorage, Alaska 99513 Telephones 486-5736 - 486-5737 — Box 1246 KO ALASKA 99615 Re: Kodiak Island Public Low Rent; Project No. AK02-B013-011 Dear Mr. Gordon: This letter is to clarify action taken by the Kodiak Island Borough Assembly in regards to permissive zoning and provisions for water and sewer services to the subject project. On July 2, 1981, the Borough Assembly granted the Kodiak Island Housing Authority a variance to the R-2 zoning of Tracts B and E, Kadiak Alaska Subdivision, thereby approving this project. At the time the variance was granted, the Borough Assembly required that the project be annexed to the City of Kodiak so that water and sewer services could be provided. Please be advised that the Kodiak Island Borough has implemented its "non-areawide powers" under AS 29.38.020 and AS 29.48.030 establishing Service District No. I to provide water, sewer, fire protection and road maintenance to the area in which the subject project lies. The Service District is under the authority of the Borough Assembly which has received a seven million dollar appropriation from the State of Alaska for the engineering and construction of water and sewer lines in this area. This was obviously not the case when the requirement of annexation was imposed upon the Housing Authority last July. At their February 4, 1982 meeting the Borough Assembly approved the Housing Authority's request to remove the requirement of annexation since the Service District will be provided water and sewer services. In addition, the Kodiak Island Borough has received a Small Cities Community Development Block Grant in the amount of $200,000.00 which will be used to fund the water/sewer lines to the subject project. The construction of the water/sewer lines have been incorporated into Kodiak Island Housing Authority!s contract documents. After-final inspection, the lines will be dedicated for use by the Service District at which time adequate and continuous water will be provided at rates equal to other users within the District. Gearry Gordon, Direct(,_ .f Housing Page 2 I hope this letter clarifies my earlier letter of February 8, 1982 and satisfies your department's requirements. Phil C. Shealy Borough Manager CC Kodiak Island Housing Authority & Zoning Commission mdd Kodiak Island Borouc,_ Kodiak, Alaska RECEIVED FEB 2 2 1982 PM 31 Vi C 11.°11,1A111flq19 February 18, 1982 Mr. Tom Azumbrado Executive Director Kodiak Island Housing Authority P.O. Box 197 -Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Subject: KODIAK PRELIMINARY HOUSING SITE REPORT HUD STATE I.D. NO. AK811119-01 Dear Mr. Azumbrado: Iliktn1 WaLtart AtictutiK Islastcl The Alaska State Clearinghouse (SCH) has completed review of the refer- enced proposal. The following comnent was received from the City of Kodiak: "A Public hearing was held on this project on May 20, 1981 before the Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission, at which time the request.to develop was denied. Since that time, the dev- eloper, Mr. Azumbrado, of the Kodiak Island Housing Authority, filed an appeal letter dated May 29, 1981. This matter was heard by the Kodiak Borough Assembly, sitting as a Board of Adjustment, on July 2, 1981. "The Board of Adjustment reversed the decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission and added eight conditions to be met prior to - development. One of those conditions was that this property be annexed to the City of Kodiak. "On May 28, 1981 the Kodiak City Council denied annexation. There- fore, until this property is annexed to the City, the conditions of development placed upon it by the Board of Adjustment cannot be met. The Council felt that the request for annexation was premature and incomplete. The Council stated that if/when this petition becomes "timely and complete", it may he reintroduced." Mr. Tom Azumbrado The Kodiak Island Borough Commented: -2- _.ebruary 18, 1982 "The information you forwarded on Kodiak Island Housing Authority's Preliminary Housing Site Report (State No. AK811110 -01) was re- ceived on November 30, 1981. The subject project has been the point of much discussion in the Kodiak area. The following facts are pertinent: "1. The property is zoned R -2 Two Family Residential; "2. On May 15, 1980 the Borough and Housing Authority entered into a "Cooperation Agreement "; "3. On November.6, 1980 the Borough Assembly passed resolution 80 -55 making the property involved available to the Housing • Authori ty ' for 10% of its Fair Market Value; "4. On December 3, 1980 the Borough issued a Quit Claim Deed to the Authority for the property; and "5. On April 10, 1981 the Borough submitted a final application to HUD for $200,000 of CDBG funds to construct a sewer line for the Housing Authority's project. That grant request was approved. "The Kodiak Island Borough has continually supported the proposed project as a measure to relieve a part of the areas critical housing shortage. Approval of the Kodiak Island Housing Authority's Public Low Rent Program application is strongly recommended." We received the following comment from the Kodiak Area Native Association: "The Kodiak Area Native Association (KANA) has reviewed the above referenced report and has the following comments pursuant to the project proposal: "KAMA fully endorses the housing project as identified in the Preliminary Housing Report. KANA finds the project to comply with all Kodiak Area Regional Development Plans in existence. KANA is in accordance with the Kodiak Island Borough's priority identification of the housing need for low and middle income individuals. "KANA wishes to thank you for allowing us to participate in the A -95 Review Process." Mr. Tom Azumbrado 3- February 18, 1982 The Department of Environmental Conservation commented: "Kodiak Preliminary Housing Site Report -HUD. A -95 Review and ACMP Consistency Determination. For the subject project to be consistent. with•ACMP Standards 6 AAC 80.140 and 6 AAC 80.040 the following must be done. "1) Plans covering the sewer and water facilities which will service the subject project crust be reviewed and approved by Bruce Erickson, Environmental Engineer, Department of Environmental Conservation, 437 E Street, Suite 200, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, prior to construc- tion. "2) If construction is to occur within a wetlands (mention of peat removal suggests it is) a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permit and this Department's Certification of Reasonable Assurance must be obtained Prior to construction." In addition, this proposal was found to be consistent with the Alaska Coastal Management Program. That consistency determination was sent to you in a letter dated December 28, 1981 from James Souhy (copy enclosed). The SCH apologizes for the delay in mailing this letter. It should have been mailed to you at the end of December, but it was misfiled and, thus, overlooked until now We sincerely hope that this oversight has not caused you any inconvenience. In the City of Kodiak's comments, we noted their reference to both the Borough's denial to develop and the Borough Assembly's reversal of that decision with conditions. But the Borough's comments to us made no men- tion of these concerns. We understand that this question of annexation has been resolved by now. This, in turn would he our only concern and as long as it has been resolved we have no objection to this proposal. This letter satisfies the review requirements of Office of Management and Budget Circular A -95. Thank you for your cooperation with the review process. Sincerely, David Haas State - Federal Assistance Coordinator Enclosure cc: William Bivin, City of Kodiak William Walton, Kodiak Island Borough Thomas Peterson, Kodiak Area Native Association Tim Rumfelt, DEC Harvey Springer, HUD Gearry Gordon, HUD Tf /CZ /s73 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH February 18, 1982 Mr. Marlin Knight, Director Kodiak Island Housing Authority Box 197 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Dear Marlin: Telephones 486-5736 - 486-5737 — Box 1246 - • KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 Please be advised that the Planning and Zoning Commission, at its February 17, 1982 meeting, postponed action on your request to review and approve three previously established conditions for one month. Sincerely, Ve:2i/ William A. Walton Community Development Department Director WAW/jmj KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH PLANNING- COMMISSION MINUTES February 17, 1982, regular meet Page 1 (Verbatim tape recording available upon request from the Community Development Dept.) CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL the meeting was called to order at 7:40 p.m. COMt•1ISSIONIER'S PRESENT Virginia Crowe Ron Ball Jim Ramaglia Jerry Gudenau Tim Hill JoAnn Strickert Quorum was established. COMMISSIONER EXCUSED Pat Briggs ALSO PRESENT Will Walton, CDD, Director Joanne Jones, Planning Secretary Bill Hodgins, Zoning Officer Phil Shealy, Borough Manager Dave Crowe, Borough Engineer 1. MINUTES - January 20, 1982 - Mr. Hill moved to approve the minutes as prepared. Seconded by Mrs. Strickert. Motion PASSED by unanimous voice vote. 2. APPEARANCE REQUESTS - Kodiak Island Housing Authority. Mr. Marlin Knight - Executive Director of the Kodiak Island Housing Authority, I am appearing tonight for review and approval of the conditions that were establish- ed by the Borough Assembly on this exception to Tracts B and E, Kadiak Subdivision. I have provided Mr. Walton with a review set of the contract documents referencing where the conditions were satisfied in the contract documents. Mrs. Crowe when was this set given to Mr. Walton? Mr. Knight - On Tuesday, the 16th. The conditions that we are addressing are the requirements for the 96 off street parking stalls, handicapped parking stalls, the location of the handicapped access ramps and also the request to include an additional tot lot. We now have 105 parking spaces, 5 are for handicapped use, 2 handicapped units in the complex which are accessable by ramps. Instead of an additional tot lot we have supplied 3 additional tot lots. There are sheets explaining the tot lots and a site plan for each tot lot is included. A time table for the community facility which will be done in phase 1 of the contract is not needed as the entire project will be built at the same time. Discussion on approprating money for the future expansion of Woody Circle between Mr. Ball and Mr. Knight. t... c .. _ .: { :: ..... . ..........�_.__ Mrs. Crowe concerned with building design and sewer system. Discussion between the Commission on the sewer system for the project. Discussion on delaying this request for one month. Mr. Gudenau when will this go to bid? Mr. Knight March 1, 1982. Mr. Ball Will, have you had time to review this ? Mr. Walton we went through the plans and checked for zoning and all the items that were listed in the previous conditions. The only thing we have not gone over in depth are the contract specifications. Mr. Hill could we grant preliminary approval to this or does it go to final? Discussion between Commission members on granting preliminary approval. Mrs. Strickert moved to postpone action on this request for one month (March 17, 1982 meeting). Seconded by Mr. Ball. Motion PASSED by unanimous roll call vote. PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE 82 -013. A request for a variance from Section 17.18.040(C) of the Kodiak Island Borough Code - rear yard requirements - to permit the con- struction of a new dwelling that will encroach fifteen (15) feet into the rear yard on lot 20, block 5, Leite Addition. (John Doyle) STAFF REPORT: Mr. Walton presented the staff report based on a memorandum prepared by the Community Development Department which recommended denial. 55 notices mailed and 2 returned. Mrs. Crowe closed the regular meeting and opened the public hearing. KODIAK ISLAND HOUSING AUTHORITY P.O. BOX 197 - KODAK, ALASKA 99615 - (907) 486-5721 Mrs. Virginia Crowe, Chairperson Planning and Zoning Commission Kodiak Island Borough Box 1247 Kodiak, AK 99615 Dear Mrs. Crowe, February:1-15, 1 Persuant to your request, at the work session of the Planning and Zoning Commission on February 10, 1982, this letter will outline the steps Kodiak Island Housing Authority will take to comply with the conditions required by the Borough Assembly at their July 2, 1981 meeting in which they referred the following items to the Planning and-Zoning Commission for review and approval. 1) Site plan be revised to show 96 off-street parking stalls; to indicate handicapped parking stalls; to indicate the location of handicapped access ramps; to include an additional "tot lot".... 2) Site plan for each "tot lot" be prepared indicating sur- face material, type and location of equipment, and size... 3) A timetable to be prepared for the Planning and Zoning Commission on the construction of the Community facility. Enclosed for your reference are the final review set of the contract drawings and the relevant sections of the specifi- cations covering the care the contractor must take during the site clearance, excavation and landscaping of the project. Alsoenclosed is a letter from Mr. Roy Standley, the project architect, specifying where the above conditions have been addressed in the contract documents. Please notethat the revised site plan now includes 105 parking spaces rather than the 96 requested. Of these, 5 spaces are provided and marked for handicapped individuals. This complies with the MPS requirements that handicapped parking be provided for 10% of the dwelling units. r Virginia Crowe (PEzZ) AK-13-11: Feb. 15, 1982 2 The revised site plan now contains four "tot lots" rather than the two requested. The equipment specified is detailed on sheet A-28 and a rendition is proVided. The•equipment will be constructed of heavy, timbers and will blend well with.the trees surrounding the project site. Included in the "tot lot" will be slides, rope ladders, and_rope planks. In regards to the community facility, that building will not be "phased" as originally stated, but rather will be included in the contract documents • and.bid with the total project. Construction of this building. will .be completed simultaneously with the rest of the buildings and will be completed at the same time.. The Authority will maintain an on-site inspector throughout construction of the project so as to maintain compliance with the contract documents and quality control over-the project. We look forward to your continual interest in this project. At MK:jac Sin6erely, rnt Marlin Knight Executive Director 15 February 1982 _ Mr. William Walton, Director Community Development Department Kodiak Island Borough 700 Upper Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Re: Kodiak Island Housing Authority Low Rent Housing Project Dear Mr. Walton: This letter is to address concerns set forth in your letter dated 10 July 1981 and in subsequent discussion with the Planning and Zoning Commission in its work session 10 February 1982. Please note on sheet A-1 that 105 parking spaces have been pro- vided--in excess of the required 96. Handicapped stalls and ramps are also shown on this sheet. An additional three tot lots have been designed beyond the one requested, and these are shown on L-1, the landscape plan, which also covers the stabilization and reseeding of construction areas. Sheet A-28 further covers play area equipment. Exact position and arrangement of play elements will be adjusted to suit existing contours and trees. The community facility which accommodates the laundry and meeting rooms is scheduled to be bid and completed under the single construction contract which covers the residential structures and sitework. The estimated date of completion is 1 November 1982. Security, site lighting, and fire protection considerations have been reviewed with the state troopers, the City of Kodiak Chief of Police and the Fire Chief. Should you have further questions in detail about these items please contact this office. Sincerely you s, Roy dley Senior Associate design lab inc 625 W 5th Ave Anchorage AK 99501 907/276 5254 KODIAK LOW RENT SECTION 02100 - CLEARING OF SITE 1. GENERAL 1.1. LIMIT OF WORK SHALL BE AS INDICATED ON DRAWINGS, EXCEPT FOR MINOR GRADING TO MAKE REQUIRED ELEVATIONS AND AS REQUIRED FOR UTILITY TRENCHING. 1.2. PROTECTION OF EXISTING VEGETATION. 1.2.1. 1.2.2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PRESERVE AND. PROTECT ALL EXISTING VEGETATION SUCH AS TREES, SHRUBS, AND GROUND COVER ON OR ADJACENT TO THE SITE WHICH IS INDICATED NOT TO BE REMOVED AND WHICH DOES NOT UNREASONABLY INTERFERE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION WORK. IF ANY DAMAGE OR INJURY IS DONE TO EXISTING VEGETATION DURING THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK, THE AGREED LIQUIDATED DAMAGES WILL BE ASSESSED AT TWENTY -FIVE ($25.00) PER SQUARE YARD. 2. CLEARING 2.1. THE AREAS WITHIN THE LIMIT OF WORK SHALL BE CLEARED OF EXISTING TREES AND VEGETATION. 2.2. MATERIALS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR. END OF SECTION SECTION 02100 PAGE 1 KODIAK LOW RENT SECTION 02200. - EARTHWORK 1. GENERAL. PERFORM REMOVALS, EXCAVATING, FILLING, GRADING, AND OTHER WORK NECESSARY FOR COMPLETION OF WORK SPECIFIED HEREIN AND SHOWN ON DRAWINGS. 1.2. WORK SPECIFIED ELSEWHERE. EXCAVATION, INSTALLATION AND BACKFILLING FOR MECHANICAL WORK, SECTION 15000. EXCAVATION, INSTALLATION AND BACKFILLING FOR ELECTRICAL WORK, SECTION - 16000. FOOTING EXCAVATION AND INTERIOR FILL, SECTION 02280. LAWNS SECTION 02820. 1.3. FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S REFERENCE, THE OWNER'S SOILS INVESTIGATION IS INCLUDED IN THIS MANUAL AS APPEXDIX A. 2. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS. 2.1. ALL UTILITIES AND SERVICES WHETHER SHOWN ON DRAWINGS OR NOT SHALL BE SUITABLY PROTECTED AND MAINTAINED AND ANY DAMAGES THERETO SHALL BE PROMPTLY REPAIRED. OWNER SHALL BE ADVISED IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DAMAGES SUSTAINED. IF ANY EXTRA EXPENSE IS INCURRED DUE TO EXISTENCE OF UTILITIES NOT SHOWN ON DRAWINGS OR LOCATION OF WHICH IS NOT MADE KNOWN TO CONTRACTOR, THE CONTRACT PRICE SHALL BE ADJUSTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERAL CONDITIONS. 2.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO RAISE OR LOWER EXISTING GRADES TO BE COMPATIBLE WITH NEW EARTHWORK SLOPES AND ELEVATIONS. 3. SURFACE AND GROUND WATER. 3.1. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL SURFACE DRAINAGE, RAIN, AND SNOW ENTERING SITE AND BUILDING EXCAVATION OR FOUNDATION AND SHALL REMOVE SUCH WATER AS NEEDED FOR CONSTRUCTION, PROTECTION, OR AS DIRECTED BY ARCHITECT. EXISTING EARTH OR FILL IN BUILDING AREA WHICH IS TOO WET FROM ANY CAUSE SHALL BE REPLACED AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. SECTION 02200 PAGE 1 3.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL PUMP FROM A SUMP, OR WELL POINT SYSTEM, OR ANY OTHER WAY, AT CONTRACTOR'S OPTION, ALL SURFACE AND GROUND WATER FROM EXCAVATION AREA. 3.3. EXISTING EARTH OR FILL IN BUILDING AREA WHICH BECOMES TOO WET FROM ANY CAUSE SHALL BE REPLACED AT CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. 3.4. NO WATER SHALL BE PERMITTED TO ACCUMULATE IN BUILDING AREA. 4. TESTS. 4.1. TESTS SHALL BE MADE BY THE OWNER'S TESTING LABORATORY. CONTRACTOR SHALL GIVE 48 HOURS NOTICE PRIOR TO WHEN MATERIALS WILL BE READY FOR TESTING. 4.2. MODIFIED PROCTOR DENSITY TEST SHALL BE MADE AS PRESCRIBED BY ASTM D1557. 4.3. FIELD DENSITY TESTS SHALL BE MADE USING ANY OF THE FOLLOWING METHODS OF DETERMINATIONS - SAND CONE, BALLON, WASHINGTON DENSOMETER, OR NUCLEAR. 4.4. THE FOLLOWING TESTS WILL BE MADE FOR INTERIOR BUILDING FILL, BACKFILL AND BORROW: 4.4.1. 1. MECHANICAL ANALYSIS 2. LIQUID LIMIT 3. PLASTIC LIMIT & PLASTICITY INDEX 4. STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY 5. MODIFIED PROCTOR DENSITY 5. COMPACTION DENSITY REQUIREMENTS. ASTM D422 ASTM D423 ASTM D424 ASTM D698 ASTM D1557 5.1. COMPACTION SHALL MEET FOLLOWING PERCENTAGES OF MODIFIED PROCTOR DENSITY, ASTM D1557. INTERIOR BUILDING FILL FILL UNDER BUILDING FOUNDATIONS EXTERIOR BUILDING BACKFILL FILL UNDER PAVED AND - CONCRETE AREAS LANDSCAPED FILL AREAS SUBGRADE - INTERIOR BUILDING (TOP 12 ") SUBGRADE - CONCRETE & PAVED AREAS (TOP 6 ") 95% 95% 92% 92% 88% 95% 90% 6. SOIL MOISTURE CONTENT. 6.1. MOISTEN OR DRY MATERIAL AS REQUIRED BY ARCHITECT TO SECTION 02200 PAGE 2 PROVIDE SPECIFIED MOISTURE CONTENT NECESSARY TO OBTAIN SPECIFIED COMPACTION. FIELD DENSITY TESTS. ALLOW IN BASE BID FOR 20 PASSING FIELD DENSITY TESTS. AREAS REPRESENTED BY TESTS WHICH DO NOT MEET THE REQUIRED DENSITY SHALL BE EXCAVATED, REPLACED IN SPECIFIED LIFTS NEAR OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT, RECOMPACTED, AND RETESTED UNTIL SPECIFIED DENSITY IS ATTAINED, AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. SAMPLING. 8.1. SAMPLING AND FIELD TESTS SHALL BE DONE AS DIRECTED OR IN LOCATIONS DETERMINED BY ARCHITECT. NO TESTS SHALL BE MADE WITHOUT ARCHITECT'S APPROVAL UNLESS SUCH TEST IS MADE OUTSIDE PROVISIONS OF THIS SPECIFICATION FOR CONTRACTOR'S OWN SPECIFIC INFORMATION. 9. DEFINITIONS. 9.1. TOPSOIL - FERTILE, FRIABLE, NATURAL LOAM, CONTAINING AT LEAST 2 PERCENT OF DECAYED ORGANIC MATTER (HUMUS) FREE OF SUBSOIL, WEEDS, SOD, STIFF CLAY, STONES (LARGER THAN 1 INCH IN DIAMETER), STUMPS, ROOTS, TRASH, TOXIC SUBSTANCES OR ANY OTHER MATERIAL WHICH MAY BE HARMFUL TO PLANT GROWTH, OR APPROVED ON SITE MATERIAL. 9.2. STRIPPING - EXCAVATION AND REMOVAL OF TOPSOIL TO ITS ENTIRE DEPTH. 9.3. EXCAVATION - CUTTING, DIGGING AND REMOVING MATERIALS OF EVERY DESCRIPTION, INCLUDING FOUNDATIONS AND ROCK, AND OF WHATEVER SUBSTANCE ENCOUNTERED TO DIMENSIONS, LIMITS, ELEVATIONS AND CONTOURS AS SHOWN ON DRAWINGS AND AS HEREIN SPECIFIED. 9.4. ROCK - BOULDERS AND DETACHED STONES HAVING A VOLUME OF 3/4 CUBIC YARDS OR MORE OR ANY LARGE MASSES OF IGNEOUS, METAMORPHIC, OR SEDIMENTARY ROCK, INCLUDING FIRMLY CONGLOMERATE DEPOSITS, THAT CANNOT BE REMOVED WITH A ONE CUBIC YARD CAPACITY POWER SHOVEL WITHOUT DRILLING OR BLASTING. 9.5. UNSUITABLE MATERIALS. FOLLOWING SOILS OR MATERIALS ARE CLASSIFIED AS UNSUITABLE: SECTION 02200 PAGE 3 9.5.1. TOPSOIL AND LOAM 9.5.2. GUMBO 9.5.3. MUD AND MUCK 9.5.4. PEAT AND HIGH ORGANIC SOILS 9.5.5. RUBBISH 9.5.6. PAVEMENTS 9.5.7. VEGETATION 9.5.8. FROZEN OR DRY LUMPS 9.6. UNSTABLE MATERIALS - MATERIALS WHICH ARE NOT CLASSIFIED AS UNSUITABLE MATERIALS, BUT DUE TO THEIR CONDITION OF BEING WET, DRY, OR FROZEN ARE UNACCEPTABLE FOR USE IN FILLS. 9.7. BORROW - APPROVED SOIL MATERIALS FROM SOURCES OTHER THAN THOSE MADE AVAILABLE BY REQUIRED EXCAVATION OF PROJECT. UNLESS SPECIFICALLY PROVIDED, NO BORROW SHALL BE OBTAINED WITHIN LIMITS OF PROJECT SITE WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL. 9.8. FILLING - PLACING OF APPROVED SOIL MATERIALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFIED PROCEDURES AND MATERIALS AND IN CONFORMITY WITH LINES, GRADES, CONTOURS, CROSS - SECTIONS AND ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON DRAWINGS. 9.9. SUBGRADE - NATURAL SOIL IN PLACE OR FILL MATERIAL UPON WHICH BASE COURSE OR FLOOR SLAB CUSHION IS PLACED. 10. MISCELLANEOUS WORK. 10.1. SET GRADE STAKES ON A 25 FOOT GRID SYSTEM AROUND BUILDING IN AREA TO BE NEWLY GRADED AS SHOWN ON DRAWINGS, AND AT TOP AND TOE OF SLOPES BEFORE STARTING EARTHWORK. DITCHES SHALL BE STAKED EVERY 25 FEET ON CENTER LINE AND AT TOP OF SLOPES. 11. SITE EXCAVATION. PERFORM ALL EXCAVATING, GRADING, FILLING, REMOVALS, AND ALL MISCELLANEOUS WORK TO GRADE SITE TO PLAN DIMENSIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND SECTIONS. WORK OF THIS SECTION SHALL BE DONE IN COORDINATION WITH WORK OF SECTION 02200 PAGE 4 OTHER RELATED SECTIONS SO AS TO PROTECT OTHER WORK AND PREVENT DAMAGE TO EXISTING OR NEW CONSTRUCTION. 11.2. TOPSOIL SHALL BE REMOVED, WITHOUT CONTAMINATION WITH SUBSOIL, FROM AREAS OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, ROADS, PARKING LOTS AND DESIGNATED AREAS. FILL AREAS SHALL BE STRIPPED BEFORE EMBANKMENT MATERIALS ARE PLACED. 11.3. APPROVED TOPSOIL SHALL BE SPREAD ON AREAS ALREADY GRADED AND PREPARED FOR TOPSOIL OR SHALL BE DEPOSITED IN STORAGE PILES CONVENIENT TO AREAS THAT ARE TO RECEIVE APPLICATION OF TOPSOIL LATER. TOPSOIL SHALL BE KEPT SEPARATE FROM OTHER EXCAVATED MATERIALS AND PILED FREE OF ROOTS, STONES, DEBRIS, AND OTHER UNDESIRABLE MATERIALS. NO TOPSOIL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM SITE WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION OF ARCHITECT. TOPSOIL STRIPPED AND STORED SHALL BE SPREAD FIRST AND COMPLETELY UTILIZED BEFORE OFFSITE TOPSOIL MATERIALS ARE USED. 11.4. IF QUANTITY OF STORED TOPSOIL IS INADEQUATE, OR, IF NONE HAS BEEN SALVAGED FROM SITE, CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH, AT HIS EXPENSE, SUFFICIENT TOPSOIL TO PROPERLY INSTALL WORK AS SPECIFIED HEREIN, AND AS SHOWN ON DRAWINGS. TOPSOIL SO FURNISHED SHALL BE APPROVED BY ARCHITECT BEFORE DELIVERY. 11.5. AFTER SPREADING AND GRADING OF. TOPSOIL HAS BEEN ACCEPTED BY OWNER, CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY EROSION OR REPLACEMENT OF ANY TOPSOIL. SHAPED WHERE LOCATED ON THE DRAWINGS. BUILDING EXCAVATION. PERFORM ALL EXCAVATING IN BUILDING AREA AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. BUILDING AREA SHALL BE DEFINED AS AREA WITHIN ENCLOSING WALLS AND APPURTENANCES OF BUILDING PLUS IMMEDIATELY SURROUNDING AREA. 13. SITE FILLING. 13.1. FILLS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AT LOCATIONS AND TO CONTOURS, ELEVATIONS AND SECTIONS SHOWN ON DRAWINGS. 13.2. SLOPED GROUND SURFACES STEEPER THAN 1 VERTICAL TO 4 HORIZONTAL ON WHICH FILL IS TO BE PLACED SHALL BE PLOWED, STEPPED, BENCHED, OR BROKEN UP AS DIRECTED, IN SUCH A MANNER THAT FILL MATERIAL WILL BOND WITH EXISTING SURFACE. SECTION 02200 PAGE 5 13.3. APPROVED MATERIAL FROM EXCAVATION SHALL BE USED IN FORMING FILL. FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE FREE FROM ROOTS, ORGANIC MATERIAL, AND TRASH, AND FROM STONES HAVING MAXIMUM DIMENSION LARGER THAN 6 INCHES. 13.4. FURNISH AND PLACE SPECIFIED BORROW MATERIAL FROM OFF SITE SOURCES AND FILL AND COMPACT AS REQUIRED. 13.5. MATERIALS IN LAWN AREAS SHALL BE PLACED IN SUCCESSIVE HORIZONTAL LAYERS OF 12 INCHES LOOSE THICKNESS. CARE SHALL BE EXERCISED SO THAT EQUIPMENT USED WILL NOT OVERLOAD UNDERLYING STRUCTURES IN PASSING OVER AND COMPACTING FILLS. IN ROAD AND PARKING AREAS, LAYERS SHALL NOT BE MORE THAN 9 INCHES LOOSE THICKNESS. 14. BACKFILL. 14.1. AFTER FOUNDATION, FOUNDATION WALLS AND OTHER PERMANENT WORK IN EXCAVATION HAS BEEN INSPECTED AND APPROVED, EXCAVATION SHALL BE CLEANED OF ALL FORMWORK, TRASH AND DEBRIS. SHORING, SHEETING AND BRACING SHALL BE ARRANGED. AS NECESSARY. WHERE FILL OR BACKFILL IS PLACED AND COMPACTED AGAINST WALLS, SUPPORT LATERALLY AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT DISPLACING. EACH LAYER SHALL BE UNIFORMLY SPREAD, MOISTENED OR DRIED, WHEN REQUIRED, AND UNIFORMLY COMPACTED BY VIBRATION, MACHINE TAMPERS OR BY OTHER APPROVED METHODS. HEAVY EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE OPERATED CLOSER TO WALL THAN A DISTANCE EQUAL TO HEIGHT OF BACKFILL ABOVE BOTTOM OF FOOTING. 14.2. BACKFILL SHALL CONSIST OF APPROVED MATERIAL FROM THE EXCAVATION. 14.3. BACKFILL SHALL BE PLACED IN SUCCESSIVE HORIZONTAL LAYERS OF 9 INCHES LOOSE THICKNESS AND COMPACTED. BACKFILL SHALL BE FREE OF TRASH, DEBRIS, VEGETATION, FROZEN - MATERIAL OR OTHER FOREIGN MATTER. CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO PROTECT WALLS, DAMPPROOFING, DRAINS, AND UNDERGROUND PIPING. MATERIAL QUALIFICATION TESTS SHALL BE MADE AS ORDERED BY ARCHITECT. 15. FINISHED GRADING. 15.1. UNIFORMLY SMOOTH GRADING SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED ON ALL AREAS. FINISHED SURFACES SHALL BE REASONABLY SMOOTH, COMPACTED AND FREE FROM ALL BUILDING DEBRIS AND RUBBISH. DEGREE OF FINISH SHALL BE THAT ORDINARILY OBTAINABLE FROM BLADE - GRADER OPERATIONS, EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. DITCHES AND GUTTERS SHALL BE FINISHED SO AS TO DRAIN READILY. SURFACE OF AREAS TO SECTION 02200 PAGE 6 BE TOPSOILED SHALL BE FINISHED TO A SMOOTHNESS SUITABLE FOR APPLICATION OF TOPSOIL. 15.2. DURING CONSTRUCTION, FILL AND EXCAVATIONS SHALL BE KEPT SHAPED AND DRAINED. DITCHES AND DRAINS ALONG SUBGRADE SHALL BE MADE AND MAINTAINED IN SUCH MANNER AS TO DRAIN EFFECTIVELY AT ALL TIMES. WHERE RUTS OCCUR IN SUBGRADE, SUBGRADE SHALL BE BROUGHT TO GRADE, RESHAPED IF REQUIRED AND RECOMPACTED PRIOR TO PLACING OF FINISHED SURFACE. NEWLY GRADED AREAS SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM TRAFFIC AND FROM EROSION. SETTLEMENT OR WASHING AWAY THAT OCCURS FROM ANY CAUSE PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE SHALL BE REPAIRED AND GRADES RE- ESTABLISHED TO REQUIRED ELEVATIONS AND SLOPES, AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. 15.3. FINAL SHAPING AND COMPACTING OF SUBGRADE SHALL BE DONE JUST PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF BASE COURSE. AFTER SUBGRADE HAS BEEN SHAPED IN LINE, GRADE, AND CROSS SECTION, IT SHALL BE ROLLED WITH APPROVED EQUIPMENT UNTIL THOROUGHLY COMPACTED. THIS OPERATION SHALL INCLUDE ANY RESHAPING AND WETTING REQUIRED ALONG WITH ROLLING OF SUBGRADE TO OBTAIN SPECIFIED COMPACTION. 16. - RESTORATION. 16.1. RESTORE TO ORIGINAL OR BETTER CONDITIONS ALL AREAS DAMAGED BY CONSTRUCTION. USE PLAN DETAILS FOR WALKS, ROADS AND PARKING, AND GRASS AREAS, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. END OF SECTION SECTION 02200 PAGE 7 KODIAK LOW RENT SECTION 02280 - FOOTING EXCAVATION AND INTERIOR FILL 1. GENERAL. 1.1. FURNISH ALL LABOR, EQUIPMENT, AND MATERIALS NECESSARY FOR THE FOLLOWING: 1.1.1. EXCAVAT.ION FOR WALL FOOTINGS OCCURING BELOW THE SUBGRADE FOR SLABS ON GROUND. 1.1.2. EXCAVATION FOR INTERIOR SLABS ON GROUND. THE FURNISHING AND PLACEMENT OF FILL WITHIN THE BUILDING. BUILDING EXCAVATION IS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 02200, AND IS NOT A PART OF THIS SECTION. MATERIALS. 2.1. SELECTED FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE ESSENTIALLY WELL GRADED SAND AND GRAVEL OR CRUSHED ROCK, APPROVED BY THE ARCHITECT, FROM EXCAVATION FOR THE BUILDING. THE FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE NON - EXPANSIVE, FREE OF ORGANIC MATTER AND DELETERIOUS SUBSTANCES. EXCAVATION. 3.1. PERFORM ALL EXCAVATING OF EVERY DESCRIPTION TO THE LINES, ELEVATIONS AND SECTIONS INDICATED. SUFFICIENT SPACE SHALL BE ALLOWED FOR REMOVING FORMS, INSPECTING, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK. CARE SHALL BE TAKEN NOT TO DISTURB THE BOTTOM OF THE EXCAVATION. OVERDEPTH EXCAVATION BELOW ELEVATIONS SHOWN FOR FOOTINGS AND THE BOTTOMS OF ALL EXCAVATIONS FOR FOOTINGS SHALL BE PROPERLY TRIMMED, LEVELED AND CLEARED OF ALL LOOSE EARTH SO THAT FOOTINGS REST ON UNDISTURBED SOIL. THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE INSPECTED BY THE ARCHITECT AND HIS APPROVAL OBTAINED BEFORE ANY CONCRETE IS PLACED. 3.2. ALL UNSUITABLE OR UNSTABLE MATERIAL SHALL BE EXCAVATED TO THE DEPTHS AND LIMITS AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS, HEREIN SPECIFIED, AND/OR AS REQUIRED FOR SUBGRADE CORRECTION. THE EXCAVATED MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE AREA. 4. SUBSOIL PREPARATION. 4.1. PROOF .ROLLING OF THE EXPOSED SUBGRADE IS REQUIRED IN THE BUILDING AREA. SEE. SECTION 02200. SECTION 02280 PAGE 1 4.2. THE EXPOSED SUBSOIL SHALL BE INSPECTED FOR APPROVAL BY THE ARCHITECT BEFORE COMMENCING WITH COMPACTION OF THE EXISTING SUBSOIL OR PLACEMENT OF ANY FILL. IF THE SUITABLE SUBSOIL IS ON A GRADE STEEPER THAN 4 -1 THE SURFACE SHALL BE BENCHED. 4.3. THE EXISTING SUBSOIL UNDER FLOOR AREAS SHALL BE COMPACTED TO A DEPTH OF AT LEAST 6 INCHES BELOW THE SUBSOIL .SURFACE TO A MINIMUM DRY DENSITY OF 100 PERCENT STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY. THE COMPACTED SUBSOIL SHALL THEN BE INSPECTED BY THE ARCHITECT. NO FILL SHALL BE PLACED BEFORE THE COMPACTED SUBSOIL IS APPROVED BY THE ARCHITECT. 5. COMPACTED FILL. 5.1. WHERE FILL IS TO BE PLACED WITHIN THE BUILDING AREA, USE APPROVED FILL MATERIALS AS HEREINBEFORE SPECIFIED. THIS FILL INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING: BACKFILL AT OVEREXCAVATION UNDER FOOTINGS. INTERIOR BACKFILL. SAND CUSHION UNDER INTERIOR SLABS. FILLING SHALL COMMENCE AT THE LOWEST PORTION OF THE BUILDING AREAS. 5.3. DISTRIBUTE THE APPROVED FILL MATERIAL UNIFORMLY AND EVENLY IN HORIZONTAL LAYERS OVER THE APPROVED COMPACTED SUBSOIL IN SUCCESSIVE LIFTS NOT EXCEEDING 9 INCHES LOOSE THICKNESS. 5.4. ALL FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE UNIFORMLY COMPACTED TO 95 PERCENT, STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY. MOISTURE CONTENT SHALL BE BETWEEN 75 PERCENT AND 110 PERCENT OF THE OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT. COMPACTION SHALL BE ATTAINED WITH ROLLERS, VIBRATORY EQUIPMENT OR OTHER PREVIOUSLY APPROVED EQUIPMENT AND METHODS. THE THICKNESS OF THE LIFTS SHALL BE REDUCED ANY TIME THE SPECIFIED DENSITY CANNOT BE ACHIEVED. IF THE FILL MATERIAL BECOMES TOO WET FOR THE REQUIRED COMPACTION, THE FILL SHALL BE DRIED BY A METHOD APPROVED BY THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCING OR CONTINUING COMPACTION OPERATIONS. LIKEWISE, IF FILL MATERIAL BECOMES TOO DRY FOR THE REQUIRED COMPACTION, THE FILL SHALL BE MOISTENED BY A METHOD APPROVED BY THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCING OR CONTINUING COMPACTION OPERATIONS. SECTION 02280 PAGE 2 5.5. NO FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED WHEN EITHER THE FILL MATERIAL OR THE PREVIOUS LIFT (OR SUBSOIL) ON WHICH IT IS TO BE PLACED IS FROZEN COMPLETELY. 5.6. ANY SOFT OR YIELDING SPOTS APPEARING IN THE FILL RESULTING FROM FROST', RAIN OR ANY OTHER FORCE SHALL BE SCARIFIED, REMOVED, RECOMPACTED OR OTHERWISE RECTIFIED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ARCHITECT BEFORE ANY NEW FILL MATERIAL IS PLACED. 5.7. THE COMPACTED FILL SHALL BE BROUGHT UP TO THE ELEVATIONS AND LIMITS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. THE COMPLETED FILL SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE FINAL INSPECTION AND APPROVAL OF THE ARCHITECT. 5.8. MAINTAIN ALL PREVIOUSLY COMPACTED EARTH AND RECOMPACT AS NECESSARY TO KEEP THE FILL OR EXISTING SUBGRADE TO SPECIFIED DENSITY AND CONDITIONS. END OF SECTION SECTION 02280 PAGE 3 KODIAK HOUSING LANDSCAPE Section 02800 02802 GENERAL 1.01 DESCRIPTION A. Work Included: The work includes labor, equipment, and materials necessary to complete the following: 1. Topsoil placement 2. Seeding 3. Fertilization and 4. One (1) year Maintenance and Guarantee The work shall be done in accordance with the Drawings and as specified herein. B. Related Work Specified Elsewhere: 1. Submittals 2. Testing Laboratory Reports 3. Clearing 4. Earthwork 1.02 AGENCY STANDARDS The botanic names of all seeds shall be as listed in the American Joint Committee on Horticultural Nomenclature 1942 Edition Standardized Plant Names. (Published by Mount Pleasant Press, J. Horace McFarland Company, Harrisburg, PA.) 1.03 SUBMITTALS A. Submit a schedule indicating dates for accomplishing work of this section including watering and maintenance schedules. The schedule shall be up-dated periodically to insure that inspections, observations and testing dates are known to the Owner's Representative, and adequate notice as specified herein is provided. B. Submit a soils report for topsoil proposed for application on the site. The topsoils report shall include tests for nitrogen, phosphorus, magnesium, potassium and soils pH. No fewer than three (3) soils samples shall be tested. Samples shall be gathered from different representative areas of the source site. Provide a liming and fertilizing schedule to the Owner's Representative. Do not proceed with topsoil installation until the schedule has been approved. C. Submit a rlete •seeding schedule includi, the information shown on seeding list in this specific )n. D. Submft inspection certificates when required under work of this section. E. Submit proof of permit or license issued by,the State of Alaska, Department of Environmental Conservation for applying pesticides orinsecticides necessary to maintain • plant health. F. Provide new soils tests prior to lime and fertilization application required under maintenance work in this section. Soils test shall be provided by an independent testing laboratory from samples taken in at least two (2) • different locations. Submit fertilizer and lime application schedules, based upon submitted soils tests to the Owner's Representative for approval. 2.01 TOPSOIL Topsoil furnished by the Contractor shall consist of a natural friable soil without admixtures of undesirable subsoil, refuse, or foreign materials. It shall be reasonably free from roots, hard clay, coarse gravel, stones larger than 1" in any diameter, noxious weeds, tall grass, brush, sticks, stubble or other litter. It shall be free-draining and non-toxic. The topsoil mix shall conform to the following requirements: Organic Material Not less than 40% nor more than 60% by volume. Loam Not less than 20% by volume. Sand Not less than 20% nor more than 30% by volume. Organic material for incorporation into topsoil, if required, shall be partially decomposed fiberous and cellular stems and leaves of any of several species of Sphagnum mosses. Organic material may require chopping or shredding to insure thorough mixing with the topsoil. 2.02 SEEDING MATERIAL A. Grass/wildflower seed shall be fresh, recleaned seed of the latest crop, meeting,the following percentages of purity and germination. Seed shall be delivered to the site in their original unopened containers which shall bear the vendor's guarantee of analysis. Seed furnished by Contractor shall conform to the following: SEEDING LIST Proportion Purity Germination Name By Weight (Minimum) (Minimum) Poa pratenis 20% 85% 80% Merion Kentucky Bluegrass Festuca rubra 'Arctared' 50% 90% 85% Arctared fescue. Alopecurus arundinacea 10% 90% 80% Creeping Foxtail (Garrison) Centaurea cyaneus 10% 90% 50% Bachelor buttons Trifolium bybridum or Trifolium repens 10% 90% 80% Alsike or Dutch White Clover Application rate: 3 lbs./1000 square feet. B. Top Dressing Mulch - Hand Seeding Mulch for hand seeding shall be a fine textured (1/8" maximum size) organic material such as peat moss, nitrified sawdust or steer manure or other approved material. C. Fertilizer Fertilizer shall have a formula of 20-20-20. D. Limestone Provide dolomitic limestone, hydrated lime will not be acceptable. E. Herbicide Provide a standard product, approved for local use and conforming to applicable environmental regulations. -3- 02803 EXECUTION 3.01 GENERAL A one (1) year maintenance and guarantee section has been prepared by the Owner's Representative and is included in these specifications. The Contractor shall maintain seeded areas according to the specifications. 3.02 TOPSOIL A. Existing Soil Prior to placement of topsoil all areas to be seeded shall be scarified and cultivated to a depth of 2 ". All - weeds, sticks and inorganic debris shall be removed. B. Topsoil Placement Spread topsoil on all areas to be seeded. After liming, fertilizing and tamping or rolling for stability, the depth shall be a minimum of 4 ". C. Limestone Application Apply dolomitic limestone at rates to bring topsoil pH to 6.0*, plus or minus 0.5. Work limestone into soil to a minimum depth of two inches (2"). Apply prior to application of fertilizer and seed mix. Limestone shall contain not less than 85 percent of calcium and magnesium carbonates. D. Fertilizer Application If dry application of seed is used, apply fertilizer with a formula of 20 -20 -20 at a rate of 5 lbs. per 1000 square feet prior to seeding. *No more than fifty (50) pounds of dolomitic limestone per 1000 square feet to be applied at one time. If more is needed additional applications of no more than fifty (50) pounds shall be applied at thirty (30) day intervals. E. Roll or tamp the topsoil so that it remains stable. -4- 3.03 SEEDING A. Seed bed preparation Lightly rake the surface prior to seeding. B. Seeding Season Seed shall be applied between May 15 and August 15 or at such times as approved by the Owner's Representative. No seeding shall take place under windy conditions or when other climatic or ground conditions would hinder seeding activities. Seeding shall only be done on days when the wind does not exceed velocities of five (5) miles per hour. C. Application Methods Either dry or hydraulic methods may be used. 1. Dry Method Apply seed by any of several methods commonly used. Seed shall be applied uniformly over the surface at the rate required in the seeding list. After seed is spread it shall be incorporated into the surface by raking or other technique. 2. Hydraulic Method Seeding shall consist of a mechanical application of a slurry containing seed, fertilizer, cellulose wood fibre and water. The slurry shall be a homogenous mixture which can be applied through a spray nozzle. Care shall be taken to restrict the application of slurry to areas to be seeded. Overspray on walls, paving and other surfaces will not be permitted. Apply seed at a rate listed in the seeding list. Apply 20-20-20 fertilizer at the rate of five (5) lbs. per 1000 square feet. -5- 3.04 MAINTENANCE AND GUARANTEE , A. A one (1) year landscape maintenance and guarantee period shall,be provided as a part of the landscape installation as follows: 1. Furnish all labor, materials, equipment, supervision, traffic control, transportation and secure all necessary permits and licenses required to maintain and guarantee the landscape in'an attractive, healthy and growing condition for one (1) year. Prior to the final inspection, the,Contractor shall submit a landscape maintenance schedule to the Owner's Representative. The schedule is subject to review and must be acceptable to the Owner's Representative before approval is given. 2. Work Force: The Contractor shall be experienced in landscape maintenance, preferably with an education in Ornamental Horticulture, with the work force to be experienced and familiar with maintaining plant materials in sub-arctic conditions. 3. Materials: All materials used shall conform to bid specifications, and be in Conformance with all local, state, or federal regulations controlling the use of chemicals, sprays, or other toxic materials. Required permits or certification for use of 'restricted' materials shall be obtained by the Contractor. Proof of certification shall be provided to the Owner's Representative prior to application of any of the above materials. B. Maintenance Procedures 1. Watering: Seeded areas shall be watered at such frequency as weather conditions require, to maintain soil moisture below the root zone. 2. Repair: Repair and replacement of all damaged or dead seeded areas shall occur immediately or upon approval or request of the Owner's Representative regardless of cause. 3. Fertilization/Lime Application: Fertilization and lime application of all seeded areas shall be made no later than June 1. Fertilizer and lime shall be applied at rates determined by a second soils test. 4. Diseases and Pests: An approved pesticide or insecticide shall be applied as necessary to maintain seeded areas in a healthy and growing condition. END OF SECTION 02800 KODIAK ISLAND HOUSING AUTHORIT P.O. BOX 197 - KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 - (907) 486-5721 February 4, 1982 Will Walton, Planning Director Kodiak Island Borough Box 1247 Kodiak, AK 99615 Dear Mr. Walton: A request is hereby made to be heard under an appearance request at the Planning and Zoning Commission work session on February 10, 1982. The reason for the request is to obtain the review and approval of the conditions set by the Borough Assembly, sitting as a Board of Adjustment at its July 2, 1981 meeting. The conditions to be addressed include: 1) Site plan be revised to show 96 off-street parking stalls; to indicate handicapped parking stalls; to indicate the location of handicapped access ramps; to include an additional "tot lot"; and to be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. 2) Site plan for each "tot lot" be prepared indicating surface material, type and location of play equipment, and size to be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. 3) A timetable to be prepared for the Planning and Zoning Commission on the construction of the community facility. I will see that the Project Architect will be present at the meeting to answer any details the Commission may have. Your assistance in this request is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Marlin Knight Executive Director MK:jac Feb. 4, 1982 Dear Borough Assembly Members: I am in total support of the construction of the proposed low- income housing project for Kodiak Island residents for personal, pro- fessional and political reasons. All of which, I will address. I am well aware of the housing shortage on Kodiak Island. I arrived in Kodiak approximately four years ago. At that time, I was a single parent of a ten year old son. I was rather lucky to have found an apartment after,a three month search, while at the same time seeking full time employment. However, I moved from apartment to apartment for the next two years, hoping to find one that was large enough to accomodate myself and my son. I had made a commitment to stay in Kodiak and I kept telling myself that when I relocated into a one room studio-"It would only be temporary". I knew full well that it would be a hardship for myself and my son and well below fed- eral standards and more importantly my standards. I lived there 6 months, waiting, hoping and actively searching. I heard of an open- ing at Fir Terrace and since I was well within income eligibility, I applied and eventually secured an apartment. This complex met my needs and it was within my price range. (I had payed as much as $750/month in one apartment, which was over half of my net income.) Fir Terrace was ideal for me and my son. It was secure, clean, well managed and rat free. It was definitely not a ghetto, filled with 'those low-income degenerates'. Well, that was a brief scenario of my personal plight in seeking adequate housing. In my professional work, in several human service agencies, I have come into contact with many local residents. It was then that I became acutely -aware of the fact that my housing history was very similar to that of the many peoplel would assist. Any human service worker will tell you that their jobs encompassed more than what the job description outlined. I found myself,not only discussing health issues but also referring individuals into the housing market, knowing fullwell the possibilities of finding adequate housing were slim. At the present time, I am involved in a rental housing survey for a non-profit agency. Although not complete, as yet, it continues to document that the vacancy rate is close to 0%. All of the other studies and documents I have gleaned information from also support this fact. In other words,it is documented that Kodiak has a housing shortage. This brings me to my third concern and it is one of a political nature. I have followed the issue of Kodiak's proposed low-income housing project since its inception, almost three years ago. I am well aware, as many people I have talked with, that the reason that this project is not moving along is because the political system does not want to address the needs of low-income people. Kodiak,though, is not alone. It is my opinion that the political system in the entire country, at present, appears to be discriminating against low-income people. Prejudices have existed forever and will continue to exist but it concerns me that it is growing at a rapid pace. Human needs are placed secondary to economic gains and prejudical beliefs. I am appalled that members on the Borough Assembly who were appointed by the people in good faith to serve the needs of the entire population are actually ppglecting the needs of the low-income people of Kodiak. Let's come together and look toward the future for all Kodiak residents. I urge all of you who have not supported this project in the past to reconsider your position, and to support this and any fu- ture projects. Sincerely, L1L 711 Ann Marshall Box 571 Kodiak, Alaska cc: Kodiak Island Housing Authority KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGh: February 8, 1982 Marlin Knight Executive Director Kodiak Housing Authority P.O. B. 197 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Tde onesi--:6-5736 - 486-5737 — Box 1246 '3'11 ODIAK, ALASKA 99615 V.7 1\9:12m (1? ' ea-.4e9Z9411 RE: Removal of Condition on Tracts B and E, Kodiak Alaska Subdivision Dear Mr. Knight: Please be advised that the Kodiak Island Assembly at their regular meeting on February 4, 1982, removed the condition that the above referenced property be annex to the City of Kodiak prior to start of construction. The Assembly believes that the required water and sewer can be provided through Service District 1, which has been authorized to proceed with engineering. This, obviously was not the situation last July when the orginial eight conditions were imposed upon the Housing Authority. Plase be further advised that the remaining seven conditions still are in full furce and in effect as orginially imposed by the Assembly at their July 2, 1981, meeting. If you desire any further information regarding this matter, please contact me at your covienence. Phillip Shealy Borough Manager cc/Will-Walton, Planning Directory PS/bt • KODIAK ISLAND HOUSING AUTHORITY P.O. BOX 197 KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 (907) 486-5721 January 22, 1982 Phil Shealy, Borough Manager KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH Box 1246 Kodiak, AK 99615 Dear Mr. Shealy, RE: Removal of condition on Tracts B and E, Kadiak Alaska Subdivision to be annexed to the City of Kodiak. The Borough Assembly, acting as the Board of Adjustment, at its July 2, 1981 meeting, approved a request for an exception to construct 48 dwelling units on Tracts B and E, Kadiak Subdivision, subject to the property being annexed to the City of Kodiak. At the time this condition was placed, it was necessary to have annexation to provide water and sewer. With the for- mation of Service District One, within which this property lies, the problem no longer exists. The Service District is now mandated to provide those services. The annexation process is a lengthy one, and will further delay and add unnecessarily to the costs of the project. Since the necessity of annexation no longer exists, the Kodiak Island Housing Authority requests that this condi- tion be removed. The remaining conditions have been addressed and the Housing Authority is preparing to satisfy each. It is requested that we be placed on the Borough Assembly Agenda on February 4, 1982. Your assistance is greatly appreciated. MK:jac Sincerely, ( Marlin Knight Executive Director KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH MEMORANDUM DATE: December 23, 1981 TO: Phil Shealy, Borough Manager. FROM: Will Walton, Director of Community Development/4 SUBJ: Tracts B and E, Kadiak Alaska Subdivision ' RE: Kodiak Island Housing Authority The information you requested is as follows: 1. On November 6, 1980, the Borough Assembly passed Resolution No. 80-55-R, which made Tracts'B and E, Kadiak Alaska Subdivision available to the Kodiak Island Housing Authority for 10% of the property's fair market value. 2. On December 3, 1980, the Borough issued a Quit Claim Deed for the property to the Housing Authority. 3. On May 28, 1981, the Housing Authority paid $14,445.00 to the Borough for the property. - CC: Case File Z-81-010 lt,., c: d. v.w d t'i:Ci.II'...L: The Grantor, KOV1: \F. ISI.AN i2R:t! er ni :ed and existing pursuant to the laws of the State of Alaska as a second class borough, for and in consideration of the sum of ONE DaLL \R (51.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of Which is hereby acknolwedged and confirmed, hereby conveys and Quitclaims to thc'KODIAK ISLAND IiOUSING AUTHORITY, INC. the whole of its right, title and interest, if any in the following described real estate: Tracts B and E of KODIAK ALASKA SUBDIVISION located in the Kodiak Recording District, State of Alaska. This decd is given pursuant to authorit of_gr;olution S0 -55 -R as passed by the Kodiak Island Borough Assembly and as further provided in Title 18.20.100B of the Kodiak Island Borough Code Assembly and as further provided in Title 18.20.1008 of the Kodiak Island Borough Code of Ordinances (Ord.'No. 80 -28 -0) and is subject to the conditions of said resolution. ATTEST:' By STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT TIIIS IS TO CERTIFY that on thc.. ''(' day of ./ • e 19S0, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Alaska, duly commissioned and sworn as such, personally appeared Danforth Ogg, Mayor, known to me to be the individual who executed the within instrument and acknowledged to me that the same was signed freely and voluntarily for the uses and purposes therein stated. DATED this , day of 55 l��'T7 ✓. irJ KODIAK ISLAND BORCUGH By �i r Q (Z, Danforth Ogg, . ayor 1980 WITNESS my hand and notarial seal the day ard'year'first above written. Notary Public in and hMy co- i'ssion expires: ()J.)(7 •5 TI uv Alaska N.r Ce•- +*.s+.o' EsoAres . . . • - " - .. • _ • „ - KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH RESOLUTION NO. 80-55-R A RESOLUTION OF 111E KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ASSEMBLY RATIFYING CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT FOR SALE OF TRACTS B AND E, KADIAK ALASKA SUBDIVISION TO THE KODIAK ISLAND HOUSING AUTHORITY. • WHEREAS, on September 4, 1980 at their- regular meeting the Kodiak Island Borough Assembly approved an amended motion 5-1; the motion reads as follows: Tracts B and E of the Kadiak Alaska Subdivision be made available to the Kodiak Island Housing Authority at ten (10%) percent of their fair market value and the Kodiak Island Housing Authority shall be responsible for the construction of Woody Way as an access to Tracts B and E, and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 80-28-0, Section 18.20.030(b) requires. a resolution certifying this action. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED this Resolution Nor.80-55-R does ratify the above-stated action of the Kodiak Island Borough Assembly on :.- September 4, 1980. PASSED AND APPROVED this 6th day of November , 1980. t. A 1 ) t. • ATTEST::, ." . • ; 01* \I .; By Borough Clerk !; 1. KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ' - • • • - • - • ..- • • - - • : • .1 'I.,: - - . 7rr.."-.. • • • KODIAK ISLz=niND BOROUGL-- Telephones 486-5736 - 486-5737 — Box 1246 KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 July 10, 1981 Mr. Tom Azumbrado, Director Kodiak Island Housing Authority Box 172 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Dear Tom, As we discussed today, the Borough Assembly at their regular meeting on July 2, 1981, requested that you provide a management plan and revenue projections for the first ten years for the Housing Authority projects in Kodiak, Alaska. As I understand the Borough's concern, there is interest in the amount of program income, operating subsidies from HUD, other sources of funding for betterments and improvements/and or modernization; as well as a breakdown of staff consisting both of administration and maintenance. At your earliest convenience I would also be most appreciative if you would provide me with a copy of the agreement between the Housing Authority and Borough and take time to review the same with me. I look forward to working with you on this and other projects in the future and would be most interested in exploring the possibilities of redevelopment powers through the Housing Authority and whether the Borough can cooperate with you in implementing other programs in the future. Sincere Phil C. Shealy Borough Manager mdd KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH MEMORANDUM DATE: December 23, 1981 TO: Phil Shealy, Borough Manager FROM: Will Walton, Director of Community Developmentii41/ SUBJ: Tracts B and E, Kadiak Alaska Subdivision RE: Kodiak Island Housing Authority The information you requested is as follows: 1. On November 6, 1980, the Borough Assembly passed Resolution No. 80-55-R, which made Tracts B and E,. Kadiak Alaska Subdivision available to the Kodiak Island Housing Authority for 10% of the property's fair market value. 2. On December 3, 1980, the Borough issued a Quit Claim Deed for the property to the Housing Authority. 3. On May.28, 1981, the Housing Authority paid $14,445.00 to the Borough for the property. CC: Case File Z-81-010 • • KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH Telephones 486 -5736 - 486 -5737 — Box 1246 KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 July 10, 1981 Mr. Tom Azumbrado Executive Director Kodiak Island Housing Authority Box 197 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Dear Tom, Please be advised that the Borough Assembly, siting as the. Board of Adjustment, at its July 2, 1981, meeting, approved your request for an exception to construct 48 dwelling units on Tracts B and E, Kadiak Alaska Subdivision, subject to the following conditions: 1. Property to be annexed to the City of Kodiak; 2. Site plan be revised to show 96 off street parking stalls, to indicate handicapped parking stalls, to indicate the location of handicapped access ramps, to include an additional "tot lot ", and to be reviewed and approved by the Planning. and Zoning Commission; 3. Site plan for each "tot lot" be prepared indicating surface material, type and location of play equipment and size to be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission; 4. A timetable to be prepared for the Planning and Zoning Commission on the construction of the community facilities; 5. Grading, drainage, and erosion plan be approved by the City Engineer; 6. Security and exterior lighting system to be reviewed by the Kodiak Police Department; 7. HRA to agree to pay therfai rrshare of WoodycCi rcl e improvements when necessary to open access to adjacent property; and 8. Cut Woody Way off from Murphy Street extended. Tom Azumbrado page 2 Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions on this matter. Sincerely, William A. Walton Community Development Department Director CC: Borough Manager Borough Clerk Case File KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH July 9, 1981 MEMORANDUM TO: Will Walton, Planning Director . LI ft(i)j FROM: Phil C. Shealy, Borough Manager , : Zoning Appeal by HRA Please be advised that the Borough Assembly approved at the regular meeting on July 2, 1981 the appeal by the Kodiak Island Housing Authority to build 48 units on Tracts B and E, Kadiak Alaska Sub- division. Approval was based on the following conditions: 1. Property to be annexed to the City of Kodiak; 2. Site plan be revised to show 96 off-street parking stalls, to indicate handicapped parking stalls, to indicate the location of handicapped access ramps, to include an additional "tot lot", and to be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission; 3. Site plan for each "tot lot" be prepared indicating surface material, type and location of play equipment and size to be reviewed and approved by the-Planning and Zoning Commission; 4. A timetable to be prepared for the Planning and Zoning Commission on the construction of the community facilities; 5. Grading, drainage, and erosion plan be approved by 'the City Engineer; 6. Security and exterior lighting-system to be reviewed by the Kodiak Police Department; 7. HRA to agree to pay the fair share of Woody Circle improvements when necessary to open access to adjacent property; and 8. Cut Woody Way off from Murphy Street extended. The Assembly did also make the findings as recommended in the staff report dated May 13, 1981. Thank you for your attention to this matter. KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH July 9, 1981 TO: MEMORANDUM Will Walton, Planning Director FROM: Phil C. Shealy, Borough Manager RE: Zoning Appeal by HRA u 9 Please be advised that the Borough Assembly approved at the regular meeting on July 2, 1981 the appeal by the Kodiak Island Housing Authority to build 48 units on Tracts B and E, Kadiak Alaska Sub- division. Approval was based on the following conditions: 1. Property to be annexed to the City of Kodiak; 2. Site plan be revised to show 96 off-street parking stalls, to-indicate handicapped parking stalls, to indicate the location of handicapped access ramps, to include an additional "tot, lot", and-to be reviewed and apprOved by the Planning and Zoning 'Commission; 3. Site plan for each "tot lot" be prepared indicating surface material, type and location of play equipment and size to be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission; 4. A timetable to be prepared for the Planning and Zoning Commission on the construction of the community facilities; 5. Grading, drainage, and erosion plan be approved by the City Engineer; 6. Security and exterior lighting system to be reviewed by the Kodiak Police Department; 7. HRA to agree to pay the fair share of Woody Circle improvements when necessary to open access to adjacent property; and 8. Cut :Woody Way off from Murphy Street extended. The Assembly did also make the findings as recommended in the staff report dated May 13,.1981. Thank you for your attention to this matter. KIB ASSEMBLY MEETING - July 2, 1981 PAGE 2 Mr. Peotter moved to override the veto. Seconded by Mr. Arndt. Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote. D. .Veto: Re: Letter of Objection to the State offering land to the public in a December 1982 sale - in particular, the 200 5 -acre parcels that the State proposed to offer on the Ugak Peninsula. Mr. Arndt moved to override the. veto. Seconded by Mr. Wakefield. Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote. E. P & Z Representative No Comments, F. P & Z Appointment Deputy Mayor Herrnsteen appointed Mrs. JoAnn Strickert to fill the vacancy on the P & Z Commission. Mr. Peotter moved to ratify the appointment. Seconded by Mr. White. Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote. * *BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT - APPEAL P & Z DECISION Deputy Mayor Herrnsteen recessed the regular meeting and reconvened as the Board of Adjustment. Public Hearing opened: Walt Ebell:(Attorney representing Kodiak Island Housing Authority) The project as planned calls for (48) units of housing, which does not exceed the density of the zoning in this area. The reason for the necessity of the exception is that the plans calls for the clustering of the housing into (3) unit buildings. Each of the buildings are divided in half so there are only (4) units on each side. The exception could be granted under three different code sections: 17.030.040, 17.30.060(8) and 17.30.060(18). John Duffy:(Area Director for HUD.) I think the design is a good one. You would have a lot more area for green space. Naturally you would save money with the cluster design and therefore you could put more money into the individual unit and have a better quality hour. We strongly support that you go ahead and provide the ruling that would give the flexibility and overrule the P & Z decision. Miller Lutton:(Deputy Director of Development) was present to answer any questions for the Assembly. Jerome Selby: Basically it would seem that there are about three options to consider in making a decision: (1) the Assembly could decide to approve the exception and the project would go ahead as designed, (2) disapprove and hope that .the housing authority would go ahead and build duplexes or (3) go ahead and disapprove it. Tom Curley:(Lot 2 & 3, Block 1 Killarney Hills Subd.) My main objection, as a property owner, is to put another high - indensity low -cost housing unit basically at the other end of the street. Ron Kutchick:(lives next to Tom Curley) Has anyone really thought about what the people that are going to be living there would rather have, duplexes or cluster housing. I'm against bunching people together. Mr. Kutchick read a letter from Doug & Rhoda Hoedel stating they are against the project and a letter from Charles & Cathy Magnusen stating they are also against the project. Pat Briggs:(Lot 6 Block 9 in Miller Estate) As a public official you take it on yourself to build a "ghetto I don't think you have that right. I do not think this development will be an asset to our City of Kodiak. I'm suggesting smaller areas not one big forty -eight development. In other words you don't have to stack them up to make it pay. Lorna Arndt: I think the Assembly should follow what the P & Z has recommended and the City Council. Julian Bean:(Lot 2 Blk. 2 Killarney Hills Subd.) I am opposed to this. I want to know why any taxpayer in his right mind would want to subsidize this. gym..... KIB ASSEMBLY MEETING - July 2, 1981 PAGE 3 Kevin Arndt: I own a piece of property connecting the questioned area and also a property owner in Killarney Hi14 Subdivision. I feel after seeing the plans it is a very well designed project. Virginia Crowe:(Chairman of P & Z Commission) The Borough entered into this agreement, the land was zoned R -2 and the zoning is not the function of the Borough Assembly; it's the function of the Planning Commission. Title 29 of the State Code charges the Planning Commission with regulations designed to provide for orderly development. We feel this is an example of overcrowding. Deputy Mayor Herrnsteen read the following letters -into record: - 1) Letter dated May 29, 1981 - Notice of Appeal from C. Walter Ebell represent ng Kodiak Island Housing Authority. 2) Letter dated August 1, 1980 - Kodiak Womens Resource Center to Mr. Azumbrad supporting project. 3) Letter dated August 22, 1980 - Ms. Anne Valley, President, Kodiak Senior Citizens to Mr. Azumbrado re: support of additional housing options for elderly in the community. 4) Letter dated July 31, 1981 - Kodiak Council on Alcoholism to Mr. Azumbrado supporting low income housing in Kodiak. 5) Letter dated Sept. 3, 1980 - United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners to Kodiak Island Housing Authority urging that this project be given top priority. 6) Letter received by the Borough May 1981 - Protest signed by a dozen persons that reside on Murphy Way, Woody Way and Hillary Lane. 7) Letter dated May 20, 1981 - Alan & Sharon Beardsley to P & Z Commission opposing zoning changes in Killarney Hills Subdivision. 8) Letter received by Borough July 2, 1981 - Susan Jewell supporting housing project. 9) Letter dated June 16, 1981 - Gordon Ryan, City Manager to Arnie Hansen, Acting Borough Manager. 10) Letter dated July 2, 1981 - Council Members Lechner, White, Hans & Pugh to Borough Mayor and Assembly. Public Hearing closed: Mr. Peotter moved to grant the appeal of the Kodiak Island Housing Authority. Seconded by Mr. Arndt. Mr. Wakefield moved to amend the motion to'•read to allow the exception to the R -2 zoning of Tracts B & E per Kodiak Island Borough Code Section 17.30.060(18). Seconded by Mr. Murray. Amendment carried 5 -2 with Mr. Arndt and Mr. Peotter casting the NO votes. Mr. Murray moved to further amend the main motion by incorporating the eight points presented by the Manager. Seconded by Mr. Peotter. Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote. The following are the eight points: 1) Property to be annexed to the City of Kodiak. 2) Site plan be revised to show 96 off- street parking stalls, to indicate handicapped parking stalls, to indicate the location of handicapped access ramps,'to include an additional "tot lot ", and to be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. 3) Site plan for each "tot lot" be prepared indicating surface material, type and location of play equipment and size to be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. 4) A timetable to be prepared for the Planning and Zoning Commission on the construction of the community facilities. 5) Grading, drainage and erosion plan be approved by the City Engineer 6) Security and exterior lighting system to be reviewed by the Kodiak Police Department. 7) HRA to agree to pay the fair share of Woody Circle improvements when necessary to open access to adjacent property. 8) Cut Woody Way off from Murphy Street. The main motion as amended carried 4 -3 with Mr. Anderson, Mr. Arndt and Mr. Peotter casting the NO votes. Mr. Murray moved to incorporate the various points presented by the Planning and Zoning Staff as to reasons this project complies with the standards set out in our Code 17.30.060(18). Seconded by Mr. Wakefield. Motion carried 4 -3 with Mr. Anderson, Mr. Arndt and Mr. Peotter casting the NO votes. KIB ASSEMBLY MEETING - July .2, 1981 The following are the findings made b the Board of Appeals: Section 17.30.060(18)(a) requires "That a proposed dwelling group will onstitute a residential environment of sustained desirability and stability; that it will be in harmony with the character of the surrounding neighbor ood;_that it will result in intensity• of land utilization no higher., and st ndards of open space at least as high, as permitted or specified in this tit e in the district in which the proposed dwelling group is located." The proposal will create a residential neighborhood. The land utilization (density) is not higher than that allowed in R -2 districts and the open space shown exceeds requirements. PAGE 4 Section 17.30.060(18)(b) requires That the tract of land on which the dwelling group is to be erected comprises at least seventy- five- thousand square feet." The tracts of land involved contain 173,130 square feet of area. Section 17.30.060(18 (c) requires "That the buildings are to be used only for residential purposes and the customary accessory uses, such as garages, storage space and recreational and community activities." The buildings are proposed as residential structures without garages. A community center is also proposed. Section 17.30.060(18)(d)_requires "That the average lot area per dwelling unit on the site, exclusive of the area occupied by streets, will not be less than the lot area required for each dwelling unit in the district in which the dwelling group is to be located." The lot area requirements of Section 17.18.030(4) is involved with this performance standards where it states for a multiple - family dwelling with eight or more dwelling units, one thousand six hundred square feet per dwelling unit." For 48 "units, all contained in 8 unit structures as proposed, 76,800 square feet of area is needed. Since 173,130. square feet are available this standard is fulfilled. Section 17.30.060(18)(e) requires . "That there are provided, as part of the proposed development, adequate recreation areas to serve the needs of the anticipated population." As discussed previously another "tot lot" should be considered. Section. 17.30.060(18)(f) requires "That offstreet parking'is provided on the basis of one parking space for . each dwelling unit within the development:" The Borough's offstreet parking and loading were revised by Ordinance 81-18 - which became effective on May '1, 1980. The new requirement is 2 spaces per dwelling unit. The proposed site plan can be revised to reflect the require amount of parking. Section 17.30.060(18)(g) requires "That the development will not produce a volume of traffic in excess of the capacity for which the access streets are designed." The platted streets, Woody Way and Woody Circle, should be designed for construction to handle this proposal plus the others which will occur in thi largely undeveloped area, Using a multiplier of 2 vehicles per unit, 96 pie -s of equipment could be present. Residential developments, like the proposal, typically generate 4 trips per unit per day or 392 trips. KIB ASSEMBLY MEETING - JULY 2, 1981 Section 17.30.060(18)(h) requires "That property adjacent to the proposed dwelling group will not be adversely affected." Adjacent property is owned by the Lutheran Church and the State of Alask (Community College). Section 17.30.060(18)(i) requires "That such dwelling group not be located in an industrial district ". The area'proposed for development is located in an R -2 District. Section 17.30.060(18)(j) requires "That the proposed group housing development will be consistent with the intent and purpose of this title to promise public health, safety and general welfare." Typical consideration for public health, safety and welfare are the availability of services, the amount of traffic generated, nuisance factors such as anticipated pet population, access to the rest of the community, natural or manmade hazards, etc. ?AGE tdt VII PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Ord.. No. 81 -26 -0 Rezoning Elderberry Hgts. Subd. First_Additibn, Blk. 2, Plus Tract "H" of USS 1396 And The Remaining Unsubdivided Portion of USS 1396, South And East of Selief Lane, In Section 28 and 29, R19W Of Seward Meridian, From RR -Rural Residential to R -2 Two Family (LeDoux & Grothe) Mr. Murray moved to adopt Ordinance No. 81 -26 -0. Seconded by Mr. Anderson. Regular Session closed: Public Hearing opened: Larry LeDoux:(owner of Lot 2, Blk. 2 on Mozart Circle) I support the change. • Public Hearing closed: Regular Session opened: Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote. B. Ord. No. 81 -27 -0 Amending Title 15 Of The KIB Code Pertaining To The Uniform Building Code (locally manufactured lumber) Mr. Anderson moved to adopt Ordinance No. 81 -27 -0. Seconded by Mr. Wakefield. Mr. Peotter moved to substitute Ordinance No. 81- 27 -0(A) for Ordinance No. 81 -27 -0. Seconded by Mr. Murray. Regular Session closed: .Public Hearing opened: Bill Williams: I would like to see under Section 1. A. changed to read one- and two -story dwellings and one- and two -story accessory buildings. Bill Beaty:(Kodiak Area Contractors Assoc.) I would like to see this tabled to see if we are really complying with the UBC. Walt Ebell:(Represents Timberline) This ordinance would allow to continue. something that has gone on in the Borough for a number of years. -The building process is what you have to look at. It is not the manufacturer's job to ascertain how they are going to ,use,it. The necessity of having this ordinance" is to provide that ungraded rough -cut spruce can be used by individuals as set forth in the ordinance. Whether the lumber is graded or ungraded does not mean that it will be used properly or improperly. Public Hearing closed: Regular Session'opened: 4 • ( S /24e, ,0°41/4V 4.7 14574 e7.-4 e9 r 1 (J.) - ID 0 c)X 43 0 tck\c sces--? • i_t_t6e,L) v /‘ r — - - c4.d_e_ee—i„eL_ 2! ��--z .- - - :AY- 0 r .2_ 3 &- rL?i9'L, iLe- ■ 1 have utilized the low income housing at Fir Terrace here in Kodiak since it opened in late 1978. Without this housing project 1 would have been unable to support my family independent of social service programs; or be forced to live with other families ine,a single dwelling. in Kodiak is outrageously expensive, when available, for families with oneosource of income ( as compared to families where both parents work ). Not everyone can afford $600-900 a month rental expense plus our high utilities (electric, utilities, fuel oil expenses). The Borough must not disregard the facts concerning the present housing needs in Kodiak. Waiting lists exist for the housing we presently have; and to deny new housing would be an irresponsible ac by our governing body. am in support of the use of this land for a housing project. Susan Jew Box 170 Kodiak, A 99615 Kodiak Island Borough Kodiak, Alaska RECEIVED JUL -21981 A M F M j KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH f MEMORANDUM DATE: June 19, 1981 TO: Mayor and Assembly FROM: Community Development Department //,eita,/aite-I4.) SUBJ: Staff Report for Board of Adjustment Hearing on July 2, 1981 RE: Case Z-81-010. Kodiak Island Housing Authority appeal of the Planning and Zoning Commission's denial of requested exceptions on May 20, 1981 Attached please find for your information a copy of Chapter 17.69 - Board of Adjustment and a copy of Case File.Z-81-010 for use during consideration of the referenced appeal. Attachment cc:, Manager 7.66.180-17.69.010 ;„, actually commence within the stated period and must be diligently prosecuted to coMpletion, otherwise the v lance is automatically voided. In such cases, the plann g Com- mission may extend the time the construction is j..6 start if satisfactory evidence of planning progress presented. (Prior code Ch. 5 subch. 2 t21C(9)). 17.66.180 Appeal--Filing. An app from any action or decision of the Planning Commissio may be taken by any person or party aggrieved. Such app,-a1 shall be taken within ten days of the date of su action or decision by filing with the Board of Adjust nt through the Clerk a written notice of appeal spec y ng the grounds thereof. (Prior code Ch. 5 subch. 2 D( )). 17.66.190 Appeal- eport. A report concerning each case appealed to the oard of Adjustment shall be prepared by the Planning Co ission and filed with the Clerk. Such report shall sta the decision and recommendations of the Commission tog her with the reasons for each decision and recommendati' All data pertaining to the case shall accompany e report. (Prior code Ch. 5 subch. 2 P21D(2)). 66.200 Stay Pending Appeal. An appeal from a dee ion granting an exception or variance stays the decision a ea ed from until there is a final decision on the appeal. Prior code Ch. 5 subch. 2 P21D 3 Chapter 17.6.9 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT* Sections: 17.69.010 Organization. 17.69.020 Powers of the Board. 17.69.030 Appeal to Superior Court. 17.69.010 Organization. A. The Borough Assembly is the Board of Adjustment for the area outside cities and for cities which do not exercise this power. The For statutory provisions naming the Borough Assembly as the Board of Adjustment for areas outside cities, see AS 229.33.110; for provisions describing adjust- ment procedure, see AS 229.33.120; for provisions authorizing judicial review of Board'of Adjustment decisions, see AS 229.33.130. 132 (Kodiak Island Borough, Ord. 80-24-0, 6/05/80) • 1 ky .69.020--17.69.030 city council is the board of adjustment within their bounda- ries pursuant to AS 29.33.110 and both city and borough boards of adjustment shall be'organized and have the powers provided for boards of adjustment in AS 29.33.110. B. The chairman, or in his'absence, the acting chair- man, may administer oaths and compel attendance of witnesses by subpoena. C. All meetings of the board shall be open to the public. (Prior code Ch. 5 subch. 2 522A). 17.69.020 Powers of the board. A. Appeals. The board of adjustment shall hear and decide appeals taken from the planning commission when it is alleged there is error in any order, requirement, decision or determination made by an administrative official in the enforcement of the regulations established by this title. B. Variances. The board of adjustment may, upon appeal taken from the planning commission and after due notice and public hearing, authorize such variance from the terms of this title as will not be contrary to the public interest where it is found that all four of the specified conditions exist. . C. Use Permit. The board of adjustment may, upon appeal from the planning commission, grant a use permit whenever it is provided in this title that the approval of the planning commission is required. D. In exercising the powers referred to in this section, the board of adjustment may, in conformity with the provisions of AS 29.10.232 through AS 29.10.246, reverse or affirm, wholly or partly, or may modify the order, re- quirement, decision or determination appealed from, and may make such order, requirement, decision or determination as ought to be made, and to that end shall have all the powers of the officer from whom the appeal is taken; provided, however, that the concurring vote of four members of the board shall be necessary to reverse any order, requirement, decision or determination of the planning commission. (Prior code Ch. 5 subch. 2 §22B). 17.69.030 Appeal to superior court.. An appeal from any action, decision, ruling judgment or order of the board of adjustment may be taken by any person or persons, jointly or severally aggrieved, any taxpayer or any officer, depart- ment, board or bureau of the borough to the superior court by filing with the clerk and with. the board of adjustment, within thirty days from the action appealed from, a notice of appeal which shall specify the grounds of such appeal. Failure to file said notice of appeal in the manner and time specified shall forfeit any right to appeal. (Prior code Ch. 5 subch. 2 §22C). 133 ROBERT L. HARTIG 0928 -19801 JAMES D. RHODES JOHN K. NORMAN ROBERT J. MAHONEY BERNARD J. DOUGHERTY MICHAEL W. SHARON ROGER H. BEATY EDGAR R. LOCKE HAEL ROBBINS WEV W. SHEA C. WALTER EBELL SPENCER C. SNEED MELVIN M. STEPHENS. II ROBERT C. BRINK OF COUNSEL: G. KENT EDWARDS • HA RHODES, NORMAN & M%r_ A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW ' SUITE 201 717 K STREET ANCHORAGE. ALASKA 99501 TELEPHONE: 1907) 274 -3576 TELECOPIER: 1907) 277-4352 TELEX: (0901 25-404 May 29, 1981 :Mrs. Mickie Miller Borough Clerk Kodiak Island Borough P. 0. Box 1246 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Dear Mickie: JIM O$ tCE: 1�/ j�(,► �,g202 CER AVE.. BOX 503 • -3143 071 IAK.: ASKA 99615 1.LTEBELL ]. 4..% IN EP HENS. II t REPLY TO: Kodiak Kodiak Island Housing Authority's Application for Additional Use Permit Notice of Appeal from Planning & Zoning Commission Decision of May 20, 1981 Our File No. K3046 -8 Kodiak Island Housing Authority (KIHA) hereby files its appeal from the Planning & Zoning Commission's denial of KIHA's application for an additional use permit to construct 48 units of multi - family housing on Tracts B & E, Kadiak Alaska Subdivision, Kodiak Recording District, Third Judicial District, State of Alaska. The appeal is based upon the following grounds: (1) The project falls within the parameters of three additional uses specifically pro- vided for in the code: (a) publically owned buildings and property, KIB Code §17.30.040; (b) government enterprises, KIB Code §17.30.060(8); and (c) group housing developments, KIB Code §17.30.060(18). (2) The project is publically owned and en- gaged in the performance of a public function ze Mickie Miller May 29, 1981 and is not obnoxious or detrimental to the welfare of the community. (3) The project is a government enter- prise, which is desirable to the public welfare, and in harmony with the objectives of the comprehensive Borough plan and zoning title. (4) The project is a dwelling group consisting of two or more buildings, the contemplated ar- rangement of which makes it impracticable to apply the requirements of the zoning title to -the. individual building units in the group, complies fully with all the conditions set forth in KIB Code §17.30.060(18), is desirable to the public welfare, and is in harmony with the com- prehensive Borough planning and zoning title. (5) The decision of the Planning & Zoning Commission was not supported by substantial evidence. (6) The decision of the Planning & Zoning Commission was arbitrary and capricious. (7) Members of the Planning & Zoning Com- mission had ex parte contacts with individuals or groups of individuals, who opposed the project, and did not reveal such contacts on the record. (8) KIHA reserves the right to assert addi- tional grounds in support of its appeal. It is requested that all memoranda, project plans, cor- respondence, and other documentation relating to this project be submitted to the Board of Adjustment in support of this appeal. Please notify us of the procedures to be followed on appeal at your earliest convenience. If you have any questions regarding this matter, do not hesitate to contact me. Mickie Miller ti } Best regards. -3- May 29,1981 Very truly yours,, HARTIG,, RHODES,. NORMAN., MAHONEY & EDWARDS. CC: :C. Walter Ebell Tom Azumbrado Kodiak Island Housing Authority CITY OF KODIAK • ORDINANCE NUMBER 603 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF KODIAK ANNEXING ADJOINING CONTIGUOUS PROPERTY INTO THE CITY AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. lWHEREAS, a petition for the annexation of property to the City .of Kodiak has been submitted by Tom Azumbrado, Executive Director for the Kodiak Island Housing Authority, the owner of that property; and, .WHEREAS, the petition contains recitals and information required by Section 15.140 of Title 19 of the ALASKA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE; and, WHEREAS, it has been determined that the property to be annexed is adjacent and contiguous to the existing corporate boundaries of the City of Kodiak; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Kodiak as follows: Section 1. Tracts B and E of KADIAK ALASKA SUBDIVISION is hereby annexed to and incorporated within the municipal boundaries of the City of Kodiak. Section 2. The annexation of the above-referenced property shall be effective upon approval by the Department of Conionlity and Regional Affairs. CITY OF KODIAK MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK RUST READING: 57-121-31 dast44:41 SECOND READING AND PASSAGE: *Ire/ EFFECTIVE DATE: Register 43, October 1972 COMMUNITY AND REGIONAL Ari—AiRS TITLE 19. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND REGIONAL AFFAIRS • PART 1. LOCAL BOUNDARY COMMISSION Chapter 05. Standards for Boundary Changes 10. Procedures for Boundary Changes 15. Boundary Changes by Local Action 20. Miscellaneous Provisions CHAPTER 05. STANDARDS FOR BOUNDARY CHANGES Article 1. Annexation to Cities 2. Detachment from Cities 3. Dissolution of Cities 4. Merger of Cities 5. Annexation to Organized Boroughs 6. Merger of Boroughs 7. Merger of City and Borough ARTICLE 1. ANNEXATION TO CITIES ' Section 10. Annexable territory 20. Application of standards 30. Annexation of incorporated territory 19 AAC 05.010. ANNEXABLE TERRITORY: (a) Territory which is contiguous to a city may be annexed to that city if one or more of the following standards are met: (1) all land to which the territory is contiguous is within the city's' boundaries; or (2) all land in the territory is wholly owned by the city; or • (3) the territory is urban in character. In determining whether territory is urban in Character, the commission may consider, without limitation, whether the property is platted or held for sale for urban, residential or commercial purposes, whether the population density of the territory approximates that of the annexing city, whether the population of the territory stems primarily from actual growth of the city beyond its legal boundaries, and 19 AAC 05.010 whether the property is valuable primarily by reason of its suitability for prospective urban purposes; or (4) the territory is presently in need of a municipal service or services which the city can provide more efficiently than another municipality; or (5) there is a likelihood that future growth and development of the city will occur within the territory and annexation of the territory will enable the city to plan for and 'control that development; or (6) the health or safety of city residents is endangered by conditions existing or developing in the territory and annexation will enable the city to remove or alleviate those conditions; or (7) the extension into the territory of city water, sewer, street; or other facilities, or of city police; fire, health or other services is necessary to enable the city to provide adequate service to city residents; and it is impossible or impractical for the city to extend such facilities or services unless. the territory is •• within 'the city's boundaries; or (8) residents of, or owners of property in, the territory receive or may be reasonably expected to receive the benefit of city services without commensurate tax ,contributions whether such services are rendered or received inside or outside the territory: •In 'determining whether this standard is met, the • commission will consider alternate methods available to the city for offsetting the cost of. providing services to individuals or property beyond its property taxation powers; or - • (9) the annexation is otherwise necessary to accomplish a valid public purpose. (b) Territory which' is not contiguous to the city may be annexed to the city if (1) all the land in. the territory is wholly owned or leased by the city or used primarily for the performance of city functions; and (2) annexation is necessary to enable the city to achieve adequate control, protection or management of the property_ 19-3 (corrected) Register 43, October 1972 COM . ■IITY AND REGIONAL AFFAIRS 19 AAC 05.010 19 AAC 05.030 (c) Territory which does not meet the requirements of (a) of this section may nevertheless be annexed to a city if such territory lies between the city boundary and territory which could be annexed under (a) of this section but for the requirement of contiguity. (Eff. 10/13/72, Reg. 43) Authority: Art. X, Sec. 12 State Constitution AS 44.19.260(a)(2) 19 AAC 05.020. APPLICATION OF STANDARDS. No annexation will be approved unless the annexing city demonstrates to the satisfaction of the commission that it is capable of extending and willing to extend services to the annexed area as follows: (1) except in the case of an annexation pursuant to 19 AAC 10.190 -19 AAC 10.240, full municipal services shall be extended to the annexed area immediately except . where impossible for want of necessary capital facilities. Where full municipal services may not be provided immediately, the annexing city shall satisfy the commission that it will provide those services within a reasonable time;. (2) in the case of an annexation under 19 AAC 10.190 -19 AAC 10.240, annexation will be approved only if the commission is satisfied that the city's plan for gradual extension of services is reasonably correlated with the gradual extension of taxation and provides for extension of full municipal services to the annexed area within the transitional period; (3) notwithstanding (1) and (2) of this section, annexation by a city possessing authority to establish and operate differential taxation zones may be approved if the commission is satisfied that the city is willing and able to use such authority to (A) provide the territory with such services as may be necessary; and (B) insure that the annexed area is not subjected to unfair taxation for services not available in the annexed area; (4) the commission may conduct public hearings or investigations subsequent to the effective date of any annexation to determine whether the extension of services or taxation, and /or utilization of differential . taxation zones, is proceeding in a reasonably expeditious and equitable manner. If the commission determines that the extension of services or taxation, and /or utilization of differential taxation zones, is not progressing in a reasonably expeditious and equitable manner, it may institute detachment proceedings under 19 AAC 05.050. (Eff. 10/13/72, Reg. 43) Authority: Art. X, Sec. 12 State Constitution AS 44.19.260(a)(2) 19 AAC 05.030. ANNEXATION OF INCORPORATED TERRITORY. (a) In the case of any annexation of territory of another incorporated city, or of an incorporated borough which is providing services to the territory that the city will provide upon annexation, the commission will determine the method by which assets, debts, and liabilities are to be distributed between the city and the municipality formerly providing services. (b) In determining the method of transfer of service responsibility, and the distribution of debts and assets, the commission will approve any fair and equitable agreement between the municipalities affected, but will independently review any proposed agreement. (c) Territory which is part of an incorporated city shall not be annexed to another city unless the commission determines the annexation to be in the best interests of the annexing city, the municipality from which the annexed territory is taken, and the annexed area, all considered as a whole; and unless the commission determines that the annexation will not result in a temporary or permanent loss of service to the annexed area. (d) No separate or additional proceedings are required for detachment of territory within an incorporated city or borough which has become annexed to another city, but the detachment is effected by and at the same time as the annexation itself. (Eff. 10/13/72, Reg. 43) Authority: Art. X, Sec. 12 State Constitution AS 44.19.260(a)(2) 19 -4 (corre c to d) Tip Register 43, October i02 COMMUNITY AND REGIONAL A':,_- :1AIRS ARTICLE 2. DETACHMENT FROM CITIES. Section 50. Detachable territory 60. Application of standards 19 A.AC 05.050. DETACHABLE TERRITORY. (a) Territory which is 'a part of a city may be detached from that city if, in the view of the commission, the detachment would be in the best interests of the state and of the community affected by the detachment. In determining whether to approve a detachment, the commission will consider, but not limit its consideration to, the following factors: (1) whether the territory is substantially non - contiguous with the city from which detachment is sought or is so situated as to render it impractical or unfeasible to extend city sewer, street, water or other facilities or city police, fire, health or other municipal services; or (2) whether within the territory conditions exist, or there is reasonable prospect for the development of conditions which, if not subject to municipal control, would endanger the health or safety of city residents; or (3) whether it is likely that future growth and development of the city will occur within the territory; or (4) whether the territory is needed by the city for any legitimate public purpose. (b) In addition to the above, territory may be detached from a city if the commission determines that the city has substantially failed or refused to provide needed services to the territory, and there is a substantial likelihood that it will continue to fail or refuse to provide such services, when such services are provided to other areas within the city and are supported by property taxes levied in the area considered for detachment. (Eff. 10/13/72, Reg. 43) Authority: Art. X, Sec. 12 . State Constitution AS 44.19.260(a)(2) 19 AAC 05.060. APPLICATION OF STANDARDS. (a) If the territory sought to be 19 -5 19 AAC 05.050 19 AAC 05.090 detached is within an organized borough, the commission shall determine the manner in which the assets, debts and liabilities of the detaching municipality shall be distributed between it and the organized borough. In making this determination, the commission will approve any fair and equitable agreement between the detaching city and organized borough. (b) If the .territory sought to be detached is within the' unorganized borough, the commission shall determine the manner in which the assets, debts and liabilities of the detaching municipality shall be distributed between it and the state. The commission will approve any fair and reasonable agreement between the detaching city and the state. (Eff. 10/13/72, Reg. 43) Authority: Art. X, Sec. 12 State Constitution AS 44.19.260(a)(2) ARTICLE 3. DISSOLUTION OF CITIES. Section 90. Dissolution 100., Dissolution effected by annexation 19 AAC 05.090. DISSOLUTION. A city of any class may be dissolved if the city has no outstanding bonded indebtedness, or if the city has proposed a method of repayment.which will not prejudice the interest of any creditor and one or more of the following standards are met: (1) the city has ceased to carry out authorized governmental functions for a substantial period of time; or (2) the city has not held an election for at least three or more successive full calendar years in the manner provided by law under the supervision of duly authorized local officials; or (3) the city has not levied municipal taxes for at least two successive full fiscal years; or (4) the city no longer meets the minimum standards for incorporation as provided by applicable law. (Eff. 10/13/72, Reg. 43) Authority: Art. X, Sec. 12 State Constitution AS 44.19.260(a)(2) Register 43, October 1972 COI—UNITY AND REGIONAL AFFAIRS - 19 AAC 05.100 19 AAC 05.120 19 AAC 05.100. DISSOLUTION EFFECTED BY ANNEXATION. No separate or additional proceedings are required for dissolution of a city within an area which has become annexed to another city but the dissolution is effected by, and at the same time as, the annexation itself. (Eff. 10/13/72, Reg. 43) Authority: Art. X, Sec. 12 State Constitution AS 44.19.260(a)(2) ARTICLE 5. ANNEXATION TO ORGANIZED BOROUGHS Section 110. Annexable territory 120. Application of standards 130. Annexation of incorporated territory 140. Statutory standards 19 AAC 05.110. ANNEXABLE TERRITORY. (a) Territory which is contiguous to an organized borough may be annexed to that borough if in the view of the commission one or more of the following standards is met, and if the commission determines that the annexation is in the best interests of the area effected by the annexation: • (1) all land to •which the territory is contiguous is within the organized borough's boundaries; or (2) all land in the territory is wholly owned by the organized borough; or (3) the territory is presently in need of a municipal service or services which the organized borough can provide More efficiently than another municipality or the state through unorganized and/or service area structures; or (4) there is likelihood that future growth and development of the organized borough will occur within the territory and arinexation of the territory will enable the organized borough to plan for and control that development; or (5) the health or safety of organized borough residents is endangered by conditions existing or developing in the territory and annexation will enable the organized borough to remove or alleviate those conditions; or 19-6 (6) the extension into the territory or organized borough of services or facilities or those of a city within the organized borough is necessary to enable the organized borough or city within the organized borough to provide adequate service to residents of the organized borough or the territory; and it is impossible or impractical for the organized borough or city within it to extend such facilities or services unless the territory is within the organized borough's boundaries; or (7) residents of, or owners of property in, the territory receive or may be expected to receive the benefit of organized borough services without commensurate property tax contributions, whether such services are rendered or received inside or outside the territory. In determining whether this standard is met, the commission will consider alternate methods available to the borough for offsetting the cost of providing services to individuals or property beyond its property taxation powers; (8) the annexation is otherwise necessary to accomplish a valid public purpose. (b) Territory which is not contiguous to 'the borough may be annexed to the borough if: (1) all the land in the territory is wholly owned or leased by the borough or used primarily for the performance of borough functions; and -(2) annexation is necessary to enable the borough to achieve adequate control, protection or management of the property. (c) Territory which does not meet the requirements of subsection (a) may nevertheless be annexed to a borough if such territory lies between the borough boundary and territory which could be annexed under subsection (a) but for the requirement of contiguity. (Eff. 10/13/72, Reg. 43) 19 AAC STANDARDS. unless the demonstrates Authority: Art. X, Sec. 12 State Constitution AS 44.19.260(a)(2) 05.120. APPLICATION OF No annexation will be approved annexing organized borough -to the satisfaction of the Register 43, October 1972 COMMUNITY /AND REGIONAL 19 AAC 05.120 19 AAC 05.140 commission that it is capable of extending and willing to extend services to the annexed area as follows: (1) all areawide and non - areawide borough services, except those.provided on a service area basis, supported in substantial part by general property tax and /or sales tax revenue shall be extended to the annexed area immediately, except for such services which, because of inherent physical limitations (such as sewer) cannot immediately be extended. The commission must be satisfied that such physically limited services will be extended as soon as is reasonably possible, and that reasonable plans have been formulated for immediate application in the annexed area for any capital expansion necessitated by the extension of services; (2) the commission may conduct public hearings or investigations subsequent to the effective date of any annexation to determine whether the extension of services is progressing in a .reasonably expeditious and equitable manner. If the commission determines that the extension of services is not progressing in a reasonably expeditious and equitable manner, it may institute detachment proceedings. (Eff. 10/13/72, Reg. 43) Authority: Art. X, Sec. 12 State Constitution AS 44.19.260(a)(2) 19 AAC 05.130. ANNEXATION OF INCORPORATED TERRITORY. (a) If the territory sought to be annexed includes part of another organized borough which is providing services to the territory that the annexing borough wilF provide upon annexation, the commission will determine the method by which assets, debts and liabilities are to be distributed between the annexing borough and the borough formerly providing the services. (b) In determining the method of transfer of service responsibility and the distribution of assets, debts and liabilities, the commission will approve any fair and equitable agreement between the municipalities affected but will independently review any proposed agreement. (c) Territory which is part of an organized borough shall not be annexed to another 19 -7 borough unless the commission determines the annexation to be in the best interests of the annexing borough, the borough from which the annexed territory is taken, and the annexed territory, all considered as a whole: and unless the commission determines that the annexation will not result in a temporary or permanent loss of service to the annexed area. (d) No separate or additional proceedings are required for detachment of territory within an incorporated city or borough which has become annexed to another borough, but the detachment is effected by and at the same time as the annexation itself. (Eff. 10/13/72, Reg. 43) Authority: , Art. X, Sec. 12 State Constitution AS 44.19.260(a)(2) 19 AAC 05.140. STATUTORY STANDARDS. (a) In addition to the requirements of secs. 110 -130 of this chapter, the commission will approve and recommend to the legislature the annexation of. territory to an organized borough only if it finds that the resulting boundaries confo.rm substantially to the standards set forth in AS 29.18.030. (b) In approving, an organized borough boundary change, the commission, with the assistance of the Department of Community and Regional Affairs, shall, if necessary, determine proposed assembly reapportionment plans applicable to the organized boroughs whose boundaries are to be affected by the change. (Eff. 10/13/72, Reg. 43) Authority: Art. X, Sec. 12 State Constitution AS 29.18.030. Register 43, October 1972 COpillvidN1TY AND REGIONAL AFFAIRS 19 AAC 10.010 19 AAC 10.030 CHAPTER 10. PROCEDURES FOR BOUNDARY CHANGES Article 1. Annexation, Detachment, Merger, Incorporation and Dissolution 2. Step Annexation ARTICLE 1. ANNEXATION, DETACHMENT, MERGER, INCORPORATION AND DISSOLUTION Section 10. Petition 20. Petitioner 30. Form and contents 40. Exhibits 50. Briefs 60. Service 70. Review of petitions 80. Notice of petition 90. Call for hearing 100. Answering brief 110. Reply brief 120. Department report 130. Hearing 140. Decisional meeting 150. Non-compliance 160. Determination of procedure 170. Certification of boundary changes 180. Public meetings 19- AAC 10.010. PETITION. A request for a local government boundary change under this chapter is initiated by filing an original and six copies of a petition and supporting brief with the commissioner of . the Department of Community and Regional Affairs. (Eff. 9/26/72, Reg. 7; am 10/13/72, Reg. 43) Authority: Art. X, Sec. 12 State Constitution AS 44.19.260(a)(2) 19 AAC 10.020. PETITIONER. (a) A petition may be initiated by (1) a municipality whose boundaries are to be changed; or (2) an organized borough in which the territory is located; or 19-8 (3) at least 10 percent of the qualified voters residing in the territory to be annexed, detached, or in the municipality to be dissolved, or in each municipality to be merged; or (4) the Commissioner of the Department of Community and Regional Affairs. (b) The person or entity initiating the petition shall be designated petitioner. (Eff. 9/26/72, Reg. 7; am 10/13/72, Reg. 43) Authority: Art. X, Sec. 12 State Constitution AS 44.19.260 19 AAC 10.030. FORM AND CONTENTS. (a) The petition shall be addressed to the Local Boundary Commission and shall bear a caption which clearly identifies the nature of the boundary change and the municipality or municipalities whose boundaries are to be changed. (b) The petition shall contain the following: (1) the name, resident address and mailing address of each petitioner; (2) the name and mailing address of the attorney or other representative designated by the petitioner(s) to receive service, notice, and all other correspondence relating to the proceedings on behalf of the petitioner(s); (3) a legal boundary description of the territory affected by the proposed boundary change; (4) the quantity of land contained in the territory; (5) the assessed or estimated value of all taxable property, giving separate totals for real and personal property in the territory; (6) the number of residents in the territory, (7) the rate or rates at which real and personal property are taxed in the territory; (8) the rate or rates of any sales tax levied by and/or collected in the territory, ,ri /.; /97&' - /979 S;_ /Me &t 4_ i9if° i -3, /980 0 41 740ic.z-#04- .rQ /may / /,2 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH Telephones 486-5736 - 486-5737 — Box 124( ICODIAK, ALASKA 9961 May 22, 1981 Mr. Tom Azumbrado Executive Director Kodiak Island Housing Authority. Box 197 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 RE: Case Z-81-010. Dear Mr. Azumbrado, Please be advised that the Planning and Zoning Commission, at its . May 20, 1981, regular meeting, did not approve your request for exceptions to Sections 17.30.040, 17.30.060(8), and 17.30.060(18) of the Kodiak Island Borough Code, to permit the Housing Authority to build 48 units of multi-family housing on Tracts B and E, Kadiak Alaska Subdivision. The failure to approve your request resulted from a one yes - six no vote on a motion to approve. You have the right to appeal the Planning and Zoning Commission's decision. Section 17.66.180 of the Borough Code states "An appeal from any action or decision of the Planning Commission may be taken by any person or party aggrieved. Such appeal shall be taken within ten (10) days of the date of such action or decision by filing with the Board of Adjustment through the Clerk a written notice of appeal specifying the grounds thereof." Per your request we are preparing a duplicate tape recording of the public hearing and discussion on this item. Do not hesitate to contact us if you have questions or require additional information. Sincerely yours, • a/ • 4:if..4Zeiic William A. Walton Director Community Development Department CC: Walt Ebell Case File Z-81-010 • KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH PLANNNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 20, 1981, regular meeting Page 6 Harry Brighton who is blasting over there? Dot y have a permit? Not opposed to zoning change.. Mr, Ball Len Grothe is preparing a Church Mr. Crowe he does have permits. Mrs. Crowe Closed the public hearins add reopendd the regular meeting. Mrs. Crowe what do we want to d• about the zero lot line problem? Discussion between the Plan ng Commission. Mr. Ball moved to clarif; the intent of the Minutes of May 17, 1978, Planning and Zoning Commission, pay= 3 by placing the following in this evenings minutes: "Mr. Ball moved to ' .nt an exception for duplex townhouses, using the zero lot line concept, for ots 1 -10, block 2, Elderberry Heights First Addition. Also the following fo conditions to meet the exception: the intended use will pro- vide two advan•.ges to the community, 1(a) reduction in cost to the buyer as a decided adva• age, (b) it will not change the appearance, permitted density or characteri is of the neighborhood, 2. no hardships would be created or adverse effects imposed upon the surrounding area, 3. we find no deterimental or pre - judici .. impacts will result from granting this exception, and 4. granting this exce ion will not be inconsistant with the comprehensive plan as the densities al wed will not change." Seconded by Mrs. Walser. Motion PASSED by unanimous I call vote. Mr. Ramaglia moved to recommend approval of a zoning change from rr -rural resident- ial to R -2 two family residential on an area described as Elderberry Heights Subdivision First Addition, block 2, and the unsubdivided portion of USS 1396 souti and east of Selief Lane in Sections 28 and 29, T275, R19W, Seward Meridian. Secon( ed b Mrs. Walser. Motion PASSED by unanimous roll call vote 7. PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE Z -81 -010. A request for an exception from Sections 17.30. 040, 17:30.060(8) and 17.30.060(18) to permit Kodiak Island Housing Authority to build 48 units on Tracts B and E, Kadiak Alaska Subdivision. (Tom Azumbrado) STAFF REPORT: Mr. Walton presented the staff report based on a memorandum prepare( by the Planning department. Mr. Walton mentioned several handouts and read an addendum on annexation. Mrs. Crowe how many notices were sent out? Mr. Walton 37 notices sent out Discussion between Commissioner's. Mrs. Crowe closed the regular meeting and opened the public hearing for those in favor. Walt Ebell I am an attorney and I represent Kodiak-Island Housing Authority. Woul' like to address the project itself, the exceptions have been outlined by the staff report but I would like to give you our interpretation of the request so that they( is no confusion in the record. The project falls within three exceptions within the code and the request is directed towards these exceptions in the alternatives. Approval of one of the exceptions will allow the project to be built. Plans be incorporated into the record as they were presented, now as it has.been pointed ou there is a question about parking and the plans would be amended to provide for the additional offstreet parking as the staff deems necessary, also we would add an additional tot lot and there would be no problem in adding additional play- ground area. The plan calls for 48 units the property is zoned R -2 and 48 units could be constructed on the property the exception is necessary for the clustering of these units. Clustering is essential. Does not increase density (overall) or contravene the plan or the zoning title. Mr. Briggs you made the statement that it would be cheaper to maintain your comple buildings as it would be for a duplex? Are you referring to yard maintenance or are you referring to the actual building maintenance? Mr. Ebell we are referring to building maintenance and overall operational costs and also costs by the tentant. Clustering would limit costs. ---- • • • • • � , ' -'� - ' KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 20, 1981, regular meeting Page 7 Discussion between Mr. Ebell and Mr. Briggs on maintenance costs. Mr. Ramaglia what provisions are made to protect the individuals privacy? Is ther sound barriers put between the walls? Mr. Ebell as I recall the plans there are sound barriers placed between the walls. Mr. Romuglia what about exits in and out of the units, is it like an apartment house or is it more individual so that the people do not have to be bumping into each other? Mr. Ebell as I recall the plans, you have exitt frmp both sides. Mr. Azumbrado in terms of some of the units being designed as an eight plex, what happens is, common entrance only has four apartments going to it. Mr. Azumbrado read a portion of his letter to the Commission on entrances. Mr. Ball parking would be taken care of. Consideration of going to six eight unit over the 48 units was cost taken into consideration? Mr. Azumbrado yes, very much so. Mr. Ball under your community center, at the work session you said it might not be constructed due to money available. Is this still your concept? Mr. Azumbrado I am willimQ to have it put down that it is manditory that the comm unity center be built at the same time. Mr. Briggs future management of project 100% financed by HUD Mr. Azumbrado that is correct. Mr. Briggs you have a payback correct? Mr. Azumbrado yes, that is correct. Mr. Briggs where does the maintenance money come from for upkeep and maintaning of the units? Mr. Azumbrado that comes from the residents. The first thing that happens is the residents pay an admit charge that goes to maintaining the unit and any surplus money goes back to HUD to pay off the mortgage. If we do not have surplus money HUD will give us a subsidy. Mrs. Crowe is the subsidy already tied down so you have the subsidy in hand? Mr. Azumbrado it is tied down in our annual contributions with HUD which is a 40 year mortgage. Mr. Briggs if you do not have enough low income families to fill the quarters you can fill them with moderate income families? • Mr. Azumbrado that is correct. Mr. Briggs what would be the average rent? Mr. Azumbrado 25% of gross income. -Discussion between Mr. Azumbrado and the C ' ission Mr. Briggs you do have a resident manager on site? Mr. Azumbrado yes. Mr. Briggs you are talking about what you say will cost about $80 thousand per unit. Mr. Azumbrado $90 to $95 thousand dollars per unit. $90/sq. ft. total development costs, dwellings at $65/sq. ft. - stick built. Federal government subsidies. Mr. Ball are you going to be available during the evening? Mr. Azumbrado if you want me to l will stay. KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH PLANNING ANDZONING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 20, 1981, regular meeting Page 8 Mrs. Crowe will all these building be constructed at one time including the tot lot, recreation center, parking and landscaping before anyone moves in? Mr. Azumbrado yes, except if we should finish building in the winter then the landscaping will be done that summer. Mrs. Crowe what assurance do we have that if you run out of construction funds that the community will not be in a bind with a half completed project? Costs have gone up 25% since you quoted us the 90 thousand dollar figure last year Mr. Azumbrado because the federal government is keeping an eye on everything l do and they will make sure that does not happen. Mrs. Crowe they will just give you more money. Mr. Azumbrado that is not necessarily the case, but [ will not exceed my budget. Mr. Briggs has your management taken into consideration the number of service m0 from the police department and so forth and public services compared to an 8 plex' Mr. Azumbrado [ expect it to decrease. Discussion on annexation. Mrs. Crowe is this the final plan, you have no plans for changing the configuratio the location of the buildings or any of the access roads. Mr. Azumbrado that is the basic schematic, that is the intent-of what we plan to do. There may be some minor changes. Mrs. Crowe how do we prevent any eyesore? Mr. Azumbrado l follow all federal guidelines in terms of that it is a lot more than the private sector would be doing. Mrs. WaAaer.who enforces the federal guidelines? Mr. Azumbrado the federal government. Mrs. Walser who in:Qattioul'nq, Mr. Azumbrado the Anchorage HUD office. They have an inspector come over every two weeks... Mr . Briggs h ow Often a re i ns-p e tions ? - Mr. Azumbrado at least once a year and if they feel they need to come more often they will. Mrs. Crowe what is the maximum number of people you can allow to live in this development. Mr. Azumbrado two people per bedroom is the maximum and if you are opposite sex one person per bedroom. So you could have in athree bedroom you could have three penplo. Never more than two per bedroom. Mrs. Crowe do these units have to be rented as family units? Nhut do you define as a family? Mr. Azumbrado family is a group of two or more people sharing all expenses, husband, wife and children. Mrs. Crowe is this your definition or HUD's definition? Mr. Azumbrado this is not the HUD definition verbatum. Discussion on who could rent these apartments. Mr. Ramuo7ia ynu,are talking about spending $4.5 million dollars here how much of that will actually impact the community? Is it going to be a million dollars come into the community to employee people for construction or what? Mr. Azumbrado you could have 4 million of it impact the community. Lowest bidder • °�°. �. r^ ,` �'�� ` ,.` • KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 20, I981, regular meeting Page 9 Discussion on who would get the contract to build this building. Mr. Ball how much money have you spent so far excluding the land? Mr. Azumbrodo $2E0,000; architects, attorneys. Mr. Bull the money is being supplied by HUD. Mr. Azumbrado indirectly. Mrs. Crowe are there any other questions by the Commission. At this time I will ask for people who are opposed at this time but first I would like to read the Letter from Alan Beardsley. Petition from the following people opposing the units: Charles Magnusen Susie Minks Cathy Magnusen Douglas Huedel Ronald Kutchick D.L. Crowder Tom Curley Deloris Crowder Sharon Beardsley Thomas Wischer F. Richardson Henry Meunier Tom Curley live block 1 lots 2 and 3, Murphy Way. right next to the Fir Terrace Ghetto. I strongly oppose this for a lot of reasons. 1. ..m0,whnt, isiUUD, Housing Urban DevelopMent, is that state money? It is Federal. How muoh did they pay for this piece of ground7 lD% of the appraised value. Nhy:1 wasn't it put up for auction so anyone could buy that piece of ground? Mr. Ball that is what we recommended and the Assembly did not want to do it that way. Discussion on the cost of the land. Mr. Curley Eir terrace looks like it is about twenty years old. .Discussion on what Fir Terrace was suppooed±odo after the approval of the permits Mr. Curley is Woody Way going to be'opened up to -Jeih' Monashka Drive? Mrs. Crowe yes. ' Discussion on cutting through Woody Way. Mr. Curley Is this a low cost housing unit? Mrs. Crowe they are calling it low income housing, which is not to be confused with low cost in construction. Mr. Ball do you get any traffic from Fir Terrace? Mr. Curley l get a lot on Murphy Way because that is where they park all their dumb cars. Mr. Ball what would you anticipate if that road was cut through? Mr. Curley I would say there is probably 20 or 22 cars if you open this road there will be 2022 cars. Discussion on the amount of cars at Fir Terrace to the amount of cars on Murphy Way. Mr. Curley can l petition to have Murphy Way rezoned from R-3 back to R-2. Mrs. Crowe it is the right of the Commission and citizens to iniate a zoning change. Yes, you can or your can request that we do it. Mr. Ball when Fir Terrace was proposed were the residences in your area against this, and in your opinion why was it built if they were against it? Mr. Curley it was 100% objection to the building of Fir Terrace. Unheoonced to th people that live in Fir Terrace the Catholic Church sold it to the Fir Terrace builders, they had already purchased the ground and the building permit before we were advised that we could object. The Church did not record the covenent that restricted multi»lg family buildings. KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 20, 1981, regular meeting -Page 10 Discussion on what was contained in the covenent. Mr. Ball Fir Terrace built their, building to code, with.only a few variances made but they were made with stipulations. Mr. Curley I can tell you that they have not lived up to all of there agreements. Mr. Briggs have you noticed an abnormal amount of services from the police station, fire department or medical department? Mr. Curley I hear a lot but I do not know what is abnormal. I do know that they make acouple appearances at least one a day. Mr. Ramaglia we have addressed technical things that are negative. about Fir Terrac which'is a development similar to what the Housing Authority is proposing, what over kinds of negative aspects have:you found living there by a dwelling that sort of dnfringed on you lifestyle other than the buildings you do not feel are kept up Mr. Curley people moving in and out every day. They make it look like a junk yard. Is there going to be a fence, are dogs allowed? Mr. Azumbrado dogs are not allowed. Mr. Ramaglia do you feel this present complex is adversly effected your property, value? Mr. Curley I think. it does. Putting in another complex would increase the amount of dust as the dirt road goes right past. Gudenau don't you think that the residences of the complex will use Rezanoff instead of the other road because it is paved. Mr. Curley that is possible but I'm sure that some will, go the other way also. Would like to see the units built closer to town so that the police could watch it closer and people could walk to town. Del Crowder I. live on Woody Way and I agree with almost everything Curley'said I think it would be very detrimental, we bought out in:that area and I am certain that if we would have known this was going to happen we would not have bought here It is low cost housing so we are talking about people who do not have much money so it should be built closer to town so people could walk back and forth to town. Andy Ozols I am the president of St. Paul Lutheran .Church, church owns the propert adjacent to proposed site. We do not have any objections as such we would just like to voice some concerns one item is the parking area and the other.concern is the access, the church has access from Rezanoff but access to the, other propert is through Woody Circle and d& to an agreement we have we have to maintain access to the back lot. Mr. Ramaglia you do not object to a multiple dwelling as long as it does not infringe on you parking. Mr. Ozols as a Church, knowing the purpose of a church, the church belongs in a community and in this case if the community moves out to the church we can not come out against the development of this. Ron Kutchick I live right next door to Tom Curley. Remembers the dovenent that Mr. Curley mentioned. Were there any stipulations that stated that Fir Terrace had to be kept up? "Who will keep this slum from becoming a slum" if you have 48 units in there who will keep it up. Each person should care for their own unit and a portion of the land. Tom Wischer resident of Killarney Hills Subdivision on Murphy Way. Addressed portions of the zoning code could you please explain. Mr. Walton explained the zoning code and sections 17.30.040 General Use Regulatior Publicly owned buildings and property, 17.30.060(8) General Use Regulations additional uses are permitted if the Planning Commission feels it meets the requir ments and 17.30.060(18) General Use Regulations additonal uses permitted in any zoning district after public hearing this deals with group housing and has ten performance standards to meet which I read off 'earlier. Mr. Wischer earlier someone stated something about obnoixous could you explain further. KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 20, 1981, regular meeting Page 11 Mr. Walton the use of the buildings and the property publicly owned and engaged in the performance of a public function may be permitted in any district provided that such use is not in the opinion of the Planning Commission obnoxious or, detrimental to the welfare of the community. 17.30.060(8) this section addresses additional uses permitted, number 8 is government enterprises, Federal, State or Local and that section states that the Commission can permit such a use if they are deemed essential or desirable to the public convenence or welfare and are in harmony with the various elements of the Comprehensive Plan and this Title the zoning code. Section 17.30.060(18) also addresses permitted additional uses number 18 is group housing development which contains ten (10) specific per- formance standards which must be meant. Mr. Wischer are Tracts B and E presently zoned R -2? Mr. Walton yes sir. Mr. Wischer I would like to give my opinion on those points, whether this group housing unit is obnoxious or detrimental to the community is difficult for me to give an opinion on, however, I think it is ridiculous to put two multi unit dwellings on either end of a very small R -2 residential area and I may even go as far as to say it may be obnoxious to do such a thing. I object very strongly to is whether or not this is in the general intent of the ordinance or not I know as a citizen and as a member of the community I believe that the communities impression of R -2 means two family units no more duplex. The area is zoned R -2 its intended for two family dwellings, duplexs at a maximum and I think you should stand by that portion'of the ordinance. Frenchy Richardson paid $23,500 for an R -2 lot 90 x 110. I do not want another complex like Fir Terrace. There are all kinds of dogs around and with the Chief of Police living next door I can't even shoot them. Is the Chief of Police going to be able to control all the driving around in between the lots after he moves out as he has 7 little house apes in a 3 bedroom house and he can't stay there forever. I do not mind 8 duplexs but I do not want to see the road go through. at the same time. Mr. Briggs can you comment on the amount of police calls to the area? Mr. Richardson everyriight. Now they have a patrol that goes through there about four times a night. Mr::'Gudenau does all the police calls relate to low cost? Mr. Briggs no, just compact of people. Charley Magnusen I live on Murphy Way. Privately owned duplexes would be better than this proposed project. I wouldn't have purchased in this area if I had known this was going to come up. Mr. Ball If there is anyone in the audience who is for or against this and does not wish to speak I would like to have them come up and sign the register and state if they are for or against this. Betty Springhill opposed. Candy Ozols opposed. Delores Crowder opposed. Mr:.Hil:l Mr. Azumbrado, is land use in your opinion do you find it detrimental to the community in that this R -2 district to the residences. Mr. Azumbrado no, I do not. Mr. Hill would you be more specific Mr. Azumbrado I think there is a lot of low income people. Mr. Ball you own the land outright. Mr. Azumbrado that is correct. Mr. Ball why didn't you, when you purchased the land put a stipulation in there that you would purchase it if you got your exceptions or the zoning changed. KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 20, 1981, regular meeting Page 12 Mr. Azumbrado the Borough knew what we wanted to do on the land. Mr. Ball in other words you can turn the land back to the borough and get your money back if you do not get to do this. Mr. Azumbrado no, the borough knew what we were going to do from the start. Mr. Ball why didn't you make that stipulation? Mr. Azumbrado I did not think we would have this problem. Mrs. Walser when you say you are allowed two people per bedroom, what is to preven a full house, in other words a mother, father in one bedroom, and two kids in each room, how do you propose no more children? Mr. Azumbrado they move to a bigger unit. Mrs. Walser what if this is a 4 bedroom unit? Mr. Azumbrado they would have to stay there, where else would they go in Kodiak. Mr. Ball say we turn it down and it goes to the Assembly and it is turned down at that time, what do you plan to do with the land that you purchased at 10% of the appraised value? Mr. Azumbrado we have not come to a decision on that yet. Mr. Briggs under the HUD conditions for low cost housings or federal grants isn't there stipulations in there requirements to shopping areas, public services? Mr. Azumbrado we have had preliminary HUD approval on it and part of the reason we moved out here is because there is minimal impact compared to if you moved to town there would be more. Mr. Briggs you did not answer my question. Mr. Azumbrado I do not know the specific distances, but we will conform to the HUD requirements. Discussion between the Commission on why HUD did not get involved with Fir Terrace Mrs. Crowe closed the public hearing and called a recess for 5 to 10 minutes. Mrs. Crowe reconvened the regular meeting. Mr. Ball would like to see this come to a vote but would also like to see all the questions answered. Mrs. Crowe stated that she felt what the commission is determining is in their opinion we are community representatives and we should give our opinion if this is the best location for the six structures that will be constructed which will be containing eight dwellings, or is the scattered site public housing better. Mr. Gudenau Mr. Garnett are you fimilar with the Borough conveyance to that lease. Mr. Garnett yes. Mr. Gudenau can you tell me what it says? Mr. Garnett in general terms, I think it is, in your packet, the revelant thing parts that relate to what we are talking about here are paragraph 4 C and E which deal with zoning approval and with other actions that may be necessary in con- nection with the project. Discussion between the Commission and Mr. Garnett on the agreement that the Borough and.Kodiak Island Housing Authority have. Mr. Ramaglia has the Borough Assembly by their cooperation agreement have they made an actual commitment to the Housing Authority that yes it is okay, no it is not. Mr. Garnett you look at it first in terms of your authority under the ordinances and you are simply being asked to decide whether or not to grant an exception to permit multi family dwellings in an area that would normally be a duplex maximum area. The other question.that may come up is whether the Borough has a whole by - ' `', '. x0DI8x ISLAND BOROUGH PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 20. 1981, regular meeting Page 13 reason of the history of this thing has made some sort of implied commitment or in some since gotten itself into a quasi-contractual obligation not to do anything, delibertly to make this project unfeasible, and that question depends on exactly what did happen at the early stages of the proceedings, and I do not know the extent to which the-specific plan to do multi family units and so forth were part of the Assembly's consideration when they approved the sale. Mrs Crowe what are the options of the people who are opposed? Can they take it to a vote of the people at an election? Mr. Garnett an Assembly action is subject to going to the vote of the public. Mrs. Crowe explained that Mr. Garnett was the Borough Attorney from Anchorage. Mr. Gudenau when you say that obnoxious or detrimental is subjective? Mr. Garnett I think obnoxious or detrimental is a conclusion in the terms of the decision you have to make its sort of the ultimate, the legal conclusion, and ther is nothing wrong with that, it is a subjective conclusion in a sense, but, it can be supported by more specific factors. Mr. Gudenau we have three sections that we have to deal with and one of them is it to the benefit of the community, but in this case the community has two sides, one is the low income/middle income family and the other side of the coin you have the people who live at the end of the block. Mr. Garnett question before you should be evaluated in terms of the criteria set out for the group housing as it is more specific. Mr. Dull in anticipating any future action on this, [ believe that the ultimate decision is with the Borough so l think we should vote the way we see it here, but in doing so I think we should anticipate that if we vote for it the people in the community will take it to court and if vote against it the people who want the project will probably take it to court, after we vote we should each make a state- ment to the reason we voted that way. - ~ Mr. Ball moved to approve a request for an exception from sections I7.30.040, 17.30.050(8), and 17.80.060(18) to permit Kodiak Island Housing Authority to build 48 units on Tracts 8 and E, Kadiak Alaska Subdivision submitted by Kodiak Island Housing Authority and Tom Azumbrado. Mr. Hill are you going to add any of the stipvlationsY Not at this time. Seconded by Mr. Briggs. Motion FAILE0, with a 6-1 vote, Mr. Briggs, Mrs. Crowe, Mr. Hill, Mr. Ramaglia, Mrs. Walser and Mr. Ball voted NO and Mr. Gudenau voted YES. Mrs. Crowe reasons for voting the way you did. Mr. Briggs after listening to the testimony I had to vote no, in this-.proposal essential or desirable to public convenence and welfare thinking of what our objective is for low cost housing, low income housing is to be the convenence of shopping centers, public safety, public offices - doctors, and medical offices, these do not met the criteria for building for these people to get back and forth easily without the extra cost of transportation. In my opinion the harmony and the elements of the comprehensive plan and title 17 does not fit into hring`nc in another high density development. The proposal would be inconsistent with the intent .of title 17 and to promise public health and safety and general welfare again putting a compact number of people into an eight pleu type of building whic| I feel is not the benefit of the welfare of the number of people that would be required to live there because of the smallness of the rooms and the public healti- and safety areas and the general welfare of the people who have to live there. l, my past experience in the last 30 years of being involved in housing projects an time that you pack people into a common area you increase your costs of maintenun' services from the public and there is no way that you can put eight people in 14 hundred square feet and live in harmony. You would be creating problems by compacting people into small areas. Low income housing should be the same as what we live in not less. Mrs. Walser First.concern is the surrounding neighborhood, and the surrounding neighbors and I do not feel that it is in keeping harmony with the surrounding area. l also based it on my own personal experience of living in public housing, I know the problems, contrary to what l read earlier where this encourages per- manent families usually results in a higher turn over of people moving in and out constently because of conflict between neighbors, l do not care how sound proof ye can get a unit together you are going to hear you neighbor. Smallness of the onil • KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 20, 1981, regular meeting Page 14 Mr. Ramaglia Privacy of the tenants is not sufficiently protected, meaning that the units are close together, small and so forth. I do not agree with calling"; R -3 R -2 and calling townhouses R -2 actually makes them R -2 I find that hard to do. No buffer zone. Mr. Ball I believe the basically have a good plan myself and I think it is a good concept, but it is in the wrong location, too much low cost housing in that area, and I think we have to look at the future. Would prefer a private enterprise. We have seven to ten acres that have just been sold to private enterprise here in, town, and I feel that if we put this project in under this concept that we would almost be obligated to do it for the next ten acres if they applied for it. Mrs. Crowe impact on the area, in our opinion is it detrimental or obnoxious to the community to allow the construction of a ghetto, stigma to the area, endangers public health; safety, welfare; not an orderly development; traffic congestion probable, does not prevent overcrowding; affects adjacent property owners; not R -2 development - prefer duplexes. Annexation - sewer /water; Kodiak does not nee. low income housing. If the housing authority wants to give a service to the community that is badly needed they could subdivide these lots and pass their land purchase saving onto the consumer in addition to offering low interest loans for tt construction of homes, the land would go back on the tax roll and people would be able to move into their own homes of which they could experience the pride of ownership and lessen the demand'for apartments and low income housing. This type ofvownership develops responsiblity from the land owner. Mr. Gudenau I voted Yes for this project. I think it was well developed, there is some interpretation of whether our ordinance states the density according to if it is an 8 plex on a certain lot area or if it is the number of square feet that that lot has. Need for low income family. Mr. Hill location is not good planning, and its not in the City Limits. I am not against the project but against the location. Mrs. Crowe before we move on are there any more comments from the Commission. . PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE Z -81 -011. A request for a front yard variance of 22' to build a garage /work shop on lot 20, block 50 East Addition, leaving a 3' front yard instead of the required 25'. (Andrew Ponchene) STAFF REPORT: Mr. Walton presented the staff report based on a memorandum prepare( by the Planning Department. Staff recommends approval of this variance. 32 notice: sent out, 1 came back with no objection and 1 came back with objection. No objection from Art Bars and the objection was from Mr. & Mrs. Bathon. P4r. :ri••s looking at the property in the back, in your opinion in that back yard a gar.'e could be built very easily couldn't it? Mr. Walton had problems when I drove by the other day there are trees in one corner, acce to the garage is what I am worried about. Mr. Ball how does his line up with all the other property on the street? Mr. Hodgins in the fi'.t photograph the house next door , this house has construct( a deck arrangement to th edge of Baranof Street and the house on the other side the grade isn't as steep b their parking is in the front. Mr. Ball so this would line up ',.th the others then? Mr. Hodgins yes. Discussion on the alignment of the house •n relationship to other houses in the area. Would be the only house with a gara:: in the front. Mrs. Crowe closed the regular meeting and openea• the public hearing. Mr. Ponchene for the variance. Thought we discusses a 9' variance. I said 22' into the front yard, I would give them 9 Mr. Hill explained what was discussed at the work session. Mrs. Crowe closed the public hearing and reopened the regular -ting. Mr. Ramaglia he is asking for 3' front yard variance . Discussion between the Commission. QUESTIONS: z WHAT IS THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN - BUILDING SCHEDULE/ 1) WILL SOME OF THE BUILDINGS BE CONSTRUCTED THEN A TIME LAPSE BEFORE THE REMAINING DWELLINGS ANDFINALLY THE RECREATIONAL CENTER, TOT LOTS AND PARKING AND LANDSCAPING? 2) WHAT ASSURANCE DO WE HAVE, THAT IF YOU RUN OUT OF CONSTRUCTION FUNDS, THAT THE COMMUNITY WILL NOT BE IN A BIND WITH A HALF COMPLETED PROJECT. 3) IS THE PLAN THAT YOU SUBMITTED TO US - THE FINAL DRAFT. DO YOU PLAN ANY CHANGES IN BUILDING LOCATIONS, ETC? 4) HOW MUCH MONEY DO YOU HAVE BUDGETED FOR UPKEEP AND 5) WHAT ARE THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF PEOPLE THAT YOU CAN THE DEVELOPMENT? 6) WHAT WILL YOU DO WITH THIS LAND AND DEVELOPMENT IF TURNED DOWN AND YOU ARE NOT ANNEXED INTO THE CITY? U IN OUR OPINION WE ARE BEING ASK TONIGHT TO DETERMINE IT THIS -IS THE BEST LOCATION FOR 6 STRUCTURES CONTAINING 8 dwellingsAPIECE? IT "SCATTERED SITE" PUBLIC HOUSING BETTER? REPAIRS. ALLOW TO DIVE IN YOUR REQUEST IS -i�i�ga w:'T .' °.S�g -4 y Tgri{x> 7-a s.. `A i '4.i Q; -:r.fV '?; 7! i ror osal < obn xous ° detriments, s4 the we fare of, tlied,com tTTAm IN MY OPIN ON IT IS DETRIMENTAL TOTHE GENERAL AREA OF PROPOSSBD CONSTRUCTION THERE IS ALREADY A LOW INCOME UNIT IN THE GENERAL VACINITY. THEREFORE WE WOULD BE PUTTING THIS TYPE OF HOUSING ON BOTH ENDS OF AN AREA THAT IS ALREADY DEVELOPED AS A SINGLE AND DUPLEX FAMILY DWELLINGS. IT IS DETRIMENTAL TO THE COMMUNITY'AT LARGE TO ALLOW THE gEWCX?NN CONSTRUCTION OF A GHETTO--'-T: _ -- .:aa =7I:` . t F 6i" rxl 3fi;^ �P�: J{ r }7xifa',r�4:�4nz`ft�4frr "�,{i', DrA oosa�� essent a xordes,3rabYe�opub,1 ic' convenience ; an NO. WE ARE CHARGED AT LOOKING AT THE COMMUNITY AS A WHOLE. NOT JUST A LOW INCOME SEGMENT. IN NY OPINION IT IS NOT INTHE BEST INTEREST TO = GROUP OR GHETTOTISE PEOPLE IN ONE AREA. A "SCATTERED SITE " IDEA REMOVES THE STIGMA TO AN AREA. WHEN YOU BUILD AN AREA SPECIFICALLY FOR LOW INCOME YOU IMMEDIATELY LABEL THIS PEOPLE WHICH IS DISCRIMINATORY TO THOSE THAT LIVE THERE. Will the proposal tend to endanger, in anyway the public health, safety or welfare? YES. THE CLOSER TOGETHER THAT PEOPLE LIVE, THE EASIER IT IS FOR COMMUNICABLE DISEASE TO SPREAD. ALSO CLOSE LIVING CONDITIONS - ESPECIALLY WHEN PEOPLE SPEND PERIODS OF TIME CONFINDED TO A SMALL AREA - CONFLICTS BETWEEN FAMILY MEMBERS AND NEIGHBORS ARISE MORE FREQUENTLY THAN WHEN THE PER CAPA DENSITY IS LESS. � n+y, �` , ` k'ni't.° P�'+� or .�f #? '4 y4 '1�. +"5l i 4.5�" r ` 'fi'I'i' a !4 2. �.'fy.;t�:°r''Y"'�t��Z ?' �4 k d,. 6'r�i a f,! 0' tE 1g9,, Q� HE S TE COD _,CHARGES USA=gWHITHa#R;EGULA TONSMIEnED T ±.'� PRO`F DEV FOR or er y development. IS ORDERLY - DEVELOPMENT ADDING TO A NEIGHBORHOOD ALREADY DEVELOPED WITH SINGLE FAMILY ANDDUPLEX RESIDENCES ANOTHER HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENT THAT WOULD PUT A MINIMUM OF 262 people in a 3.9 acre area? I THINK NOT. LESSEN STREET CONGESTION - ACCORDING TO OUR STAFF REPORT AN =ANTICIPATED 192 TRIPS PER DAY WILL BE MADE ON WOODY WAY. WHEN THE STREET IS COMPLETED AND THE RECENTLY PURCHASED LAND ADJACENT TO THIS PROPERTY IS DEVELPED, EASILY TWICE THIS AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC WILL BE DIRETED INTO THIS AREA. PREVENT OVERCROWDING....I BELIEVE THAT THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF OVERCROWBING. �'ii.S':�. �#l� .- �'S� APN1 S 5 1�1OT .f� A 2EDIi�MD j�3.S.ITY rp _ LI,OPMEl`�'Cf BiJT �A4 H GH Z EN5 yT EYEe0PMEN, THE INTENT OF R -2 ZONING IS TO ALLOW DUEL FAMILY DWELLINGSr THAT IS FOR TWO FAMILY UNITSUNDER ONE ROOF. THIS SPREADS THEDENSITY OF THE POPULATION OUT OVERA A LARGER AREA. IF THE AREA UNDER CONSIDERATION WERE SUBDIVIDED AND INTO LOTS TO PERMIT DUPLEX CONSTRUCTION, BY THE TIME SQUARE FOOTAGE WAS SUBTRACTED TO ALLOW THE NECESSARY ROADS FOR ACCESS - THERE WOULD NOT BE ENOUGH LAND AVAILABLE TO BUILD 48 UNITS. a P'rp;r*,?'�.�. ��'t iTflSrwa't�"(Pr� x 7 1}�i'7. ^vr +rn �u '+7 v ,,�^ z "F Q e7 r� dyiii'�" ii ; F,v' y' ,A�ff• °n k � sTT aS WRONG 0 APPRbUEA,LD.EUELOPMENT, THATm .CAN rNOT < -BE ABUII Tk,1?,T *THE' PRES,ENTJTIME WITHOUT ANNEXATION THEY WILL NOT HAVE SEWER AND WATER. THEREFORE`rN( tiV'ELOPMENT. BY APPROVAL, WE ARE GIVING A PUSH TO THE COUNCIL TO APPRE;VE A DEVELOPMENT E THAT THEY HAVE HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH I M3 QRTNZON KODIAK :DOES NOB" I E} D ADDITIONAI: LOW, ,INCOME: HOUSING THE REA SON PEOPLE ARE IN NEED FOR HOUSING IS 'ECAUSE'TrOFt THE` "INFLATES}` COST OF CONSTURECTION. IF THE HOUSING AUTHORITY WERE TO SUBDIVIDE THESE LOTS, PASS THEIR LAND PURCHASE SAVING ONTO THE CUSTOMER IN ADDITION TO OFFERING LOW INTEREST LOANS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF HOMES. THE LAND WOULD GO BACK ON THE TAX ROLLS, PEOPLE WOULD BE ABLE TO MOVE INTO THEIR OWN HOMES OF WHICH THEY COULD EXPERIENCE THE PRIDE OF WWNERSHIP AND LESSEN THE DEMANDFOR APPARTMENTS AND LOW INCOME HOUSING. THIS TYPE OF OWNERSHIP DEVELOPS RESPONSIBILITY IN TH LANDOWNER. HISTORICALLY IN KODIAK AND THE OUTSIDE, SUBSIDISED HOUSING LOOKSUNCARED FOR AND RUN DOWN. ONE ONLY HAS TO DRIVE THROUGH TIE AREAS WHERE WE ALREADY HAVE THIS TYPE TO DEVELOPMENT TO SEE THIS: ONEE THE ALEUTIAN HOMES MOVED INTO PRIVATE OWNERSHIP, FOR EXAMPLE, THE CARE AND UPKEEP OF THE AREA BEGAN TO IMPROVE. ONE ONLY HAS TO DRIVE THROUGH THE AREAS WHERE WE ALREADY HAVE THIS TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT TO SEE THIS. PEOPLE JUST DON'T CARE WHEN THEY ARE GIVEN EVERYTHING — INCLUDING HOUSING. 7 KODIAK ISLAND HOUSING AUTHORITY TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: P.O.' BOX 197 • KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 - (907) 486-5721 MEMORANDUM Planning and Zoning Commission Kodiak Island Borough Tom Azumbrado, Executive May 20, 1981 Public Low-Rent Housing on Tracts B & E, Kadiak Subdivision Thank you for the opportunity to illustrate why and what the Kodiak Island Housing Authority is proposing to build on Tracts B & E, Kadiak Subdivision. I. The Kodiak region has numerous studies and reports citing that the shortage_of housing is a serious problem to the continued prosperity of Kodiak. City and Borough officials report that approximately 50% of Kodiak's households have insufficient incomes to afford any housing in the private sector. Please refer to my letter of August 4, 1980 to the KIB Assembly. II. The KIHA is mandated by the state to assist low and moderate income families by providing safe, decent, affordable housing. We have entered into a cooperation agreement with the KIB and they have sold us Tracts B & E at 10% of appraised value, so that we may address the need. We have acquired funding from the U.S. Dept. of Housing & Urban Development of approximately 4.4 million dollars (total development cost) for 48 units. The KB and KIHA are also working cooperatively in using a HUD Community Development Block Grant of approximately $200,000 for water and sewer improvements to ensure that the finances are sufficient for a quality project. III. The KIHA has intended from the inception of this project to build a combination of townhouses and walkups in small clusters, per my letter of August 4, 1980, and the KIB Planning Department's letter of July 31, 1979 which cites that Tracts B & E can support 48 units of group housing under the R2 classification. This housing development conforms to the information provided by Borough Planners Harry Milligan and Jacque, Beck. Please refer to Beck's letter of October 14, 1980 and Milligan's of July 31, 1978. Planning and Z' ng Commission May 20, 1981 - page 2 IV Critical attention was given in determining development location. The site was selected because: A) The physical conditions made it technically feasible to design the project. B) Utilities are available within a relatively close proximity without any overload of the existing systems. C) There would be no increased traffic flow than what the existing road infrastructure is designed for. C) No new easements and /or vacations would be required to build the project. E) No zoning changes are required to build the project. F) The project is within easy commuting distance to community facilities, i.e. schools, churches, shopping, recreation, medical facilities. G) The site can be easily annexed to the City for full City services. The City Council on May 14, 1981 held their first hearing and unanimously voted (4 -0) for the annexation of the property. H) The site is visually secluded from the street, yet has safe and easy access to Kodiak's major traffic corridor. I) There is R -3 zoning adjacent to the site, so this medium density housing would not conflict with existing planned density levels of the area. J) There are no existing houses directly adjacent to the site, but the community will eventually expand to that general area. Planning and Zoning considers 300' as the criteria when sending notices to other property owners. V. The Kodiak Island Housing Authority is building townhouses instead of single family housing because: A) It is impractical to subdivide the tracts into parcels since the KIHA will be sole owner. B) Group housing is more economical to construct and more economical to maintain, which is especially important for low - income families and in light of the fuel escalations and shortages. Planning and ing Commission 1 May 20, 1981 page 3 C) Group housing allows better site planning, i.e. more useful green spaces, more orientation to pedestrian and childrens' needs, while providing all the needs required by automobiles. Please refer to attached information on land planning and site development. Please note that group housing, cluster housing and planned unit development are terms used synonymously. VI. The architectural program has dictated, and the schematic drawings reflect, that the housing is to be designed along the principles of "defensible space ". The primary criteria for defensible space is that the inhabitants themselves are the key agents in ensuring their own security. The architectural design releases that latent sense of territoriality and community among inhabitants because the total development is subdivided into small, defined areas controlled by a specific group of families with a central community space(for residents only)which is monitored by Housing Authority management staff. Note that instead of one large block of housing, the project is subdivided into 6 buildings which are further sub- divided so that no more than four families share a common entrance. Studies indicate that non - defensible space designs are the primary detriment to providing safe and socially viable housing and not the income levels of the residents. VII. This housing development not only complies with all local, state and federal regulations, but it exceeds the current standards in design and planning of the average Kodiak residence. The Planning and Zoning Commission, by accepting this development; will not only address many of the stated Kodiak community needs in the OEDP, but will also have an easier time eliminating the overcrowded and defacto dormitory use of housing in single family districts, encourage permanent family vs. transient, single person workers, and in general, be intuned with the planning and zoning envisioned by the Borough if the Island is to prosper and comply with the moral and legal requirements of making housing available to all its residents. It is obvious that this development is neither obnoxious or detrimental, but is in fact in the best interest of the community and in no way inconsistant with the general purposes and intent of the Planning Title. Thank you for your time and consideration. KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJ: MEMORANDU M Planning and Zoning Commission Community Development Department May 20, 1981 Staff Report Case Z=81-010; Request for an exception from the Kodiak Island Housing Authority; additional information. At its May 13, 1981 work session, the Planning and Zoning Commission asked the question: What effect does the annexation of the KIHA property to the City of Kodiak have on the request for an exception? The exception requested is for "group housing". This request is very similar in concept to that,of Maya978from,Massey-North, Inc. (Case Z- 78-044) which asked for an exception for "group housing" and the use of "zero lot lines". In both cases, the overall density-allowed is not exceeded and larger amounts of open space result because of the clustering of the dwelling units. The annexation issue is a bit more involved. It appears that the "gut issue" is whether or not water and sewer service will be available to the site if the property is or is not annexed to the City of Kodiak. The applicant has stated that he intends to install water and sewer services in accordance with City construction standards for utilities. Toward that end, a HUD grant has been awarded to the Borough to pay for a portion of the costs involved. If water and sewer service:is not available for some reason, the required building permits and eventual Certificate of Occupancy could not be issued. It does not appear that the availability of water and sewer service hinges on the annexation of the property and does not prejudice your consideration of the exception requested. THE UNDERSIGNED WISH TO REGISTER A PROTEST AGAINST THE REQUEST TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF 48 UNITS ON TRACTS B & C OF KADIAK ALASKA SUBDIVISION, UNIT 5, US SURVEY 3469. THIS WOULD ALLOW THE SAME HIGH DENSITY AS R-3ZONING, WHILE THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SPELLS OUT "MEDIUM-DENSITY" FOR THIS AREA. THE GENERAL NEIGHBORH00D IS ALREADY DEVELOPED AS SINGLE AND TWO FAMILY DWELLINGS. TO ADD ANOTHER HIGH DENSITY LIVING DEVELOPMENT (THE FIRST BEING FIR TERRACE) WILL CHANGE THE GEN- ERAL CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. WE FEEL THAT THERE ARE AREAS AVAILABLE FOR WHICH THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE IS ALREADY ESTABLISHED AS "HIGH DENSITY". NAME 22/6 ADDRESS / 2/3 /97e),,,./4, .21 3 A 2 1 212C ;12;7r y(0, A -7)74,7 (a96,47 ROBERT L. HARTIG (1928-1980) JAMES D. RHODES JOHN K. NORMAN ROBERT J. MAHONEY BERNARD J. DOUGHERTY MICHAEL W. SHARON ROGER H. BEATY EDGAR R. LOCKE MICHAEL ROBBINS WEV W. SHEA C. WALTER EBELL SPENCER C. SNEED MELVIN M. STEPHENS. II ROBERT C. BRINK OF COUNSEL: G. KENT EDWARDS TO: FROM: HARTIG, RHODES, NORMAN & MAHONEY A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW SUITE 201 717 K STREET ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99501 TELEPHONE: (907) 274-3576 TELECOPIER: (907) 277-435 TELEX: (090) 25-404 May 20, 1981 KODIAK OFFICE: 202 CENTER AVE.. BOX 503 KODIAK. ALASKA 99615 19071 486-3143 C. WALTER EBELL MELVIN M. STEPHENS. 11 EPLY TO: Kodiak MEMORANDUM Kodiak Island Borough Planning & Zoning Commission C. Walter Ebell SUBJECT: Request of Kodiak Island Housing Authority (KIHA) to construct 48 units of multi-family housing on Tracts B & E, Kadiak Subdivision, Kodiak Recording District Third Judicial District, State-of Alaska DATE: May 20, 1981 KIHA is requesting an exception in an R-2 District to construct a 48 unit multi-family housing project. The plans of the project have been submitted to you for review.-- As you know, additional off-street parking is necessary and the plans will be amended to provide off-street parking spaces as required. Except for this one alteration, the plans comply with Borough, State and Federal regulations and statutes. The plans provide for an arrangement of the housing units which makes it impractical to comply with the requirements of the zoning title regarding R-2 property. Therefore, it is necessary to request an exception for this additional use in a R-2 district. The project falls within the parameters of three additional uses specifically provided for in the code: (1) Publicall.y owned buildings and property, KIB Code §17.03.040; (2) Government enterprises, KIB Code §17.30..060(8); and (3) Group housing developments, KIB Code §17.30.060(18).. Memo to KIB -2- May 20, 1981 - In reviewing this.matter, please consider KIHA's request as directed towards each of.-the above "provisions in the.alternative". The initial two issues which present themselves for discussion under KIB §17.03.040 are (1) whether KIHA is a public entity and ,(2) whether- providing housing: for low income families is a public function. '.The answer.to both these inquiries is "yes" as explained briefly in the following discussion. First, the Borough -properly recognized KIHA as a public eritity.when the above described property was sold,to KIHA, as a political subdivision of the State, for.-less: than market - value. See Letter:from Law Offices of-Richard N: .Garnett, III to Mr. Harry Milligan, (October 9, 1979). It does not seem necessary to repeat the discussion contained in the Borough - =Attorney's correspondence, but needless to say, we agree. with his conclusions.- Second, the legislation which created the Housing Authorities acknowledged the "acute housing shortage that exists in certain localities" and declared that the purpose of the act, was to remedy the situation-. AS 18.55.010; See also AS 18.55.310; AS 18.55.995. KIHA was formed as a public corporation in .accordance with these statutes for the purpose of providing' housing for low and moderate income families; and it is now endeavoring to construct a project in compliance with the mandate of the statutes under which it was created. It logically follows that a public entity fulfilling its mandated purpose is serving a public function. There does not appear to be "a viable argument to contest the conclusion that the housing project would be "publicly owned and engaged in -the performance of a-.public .function." The remaining issue is whether the project is "obnoxious or . detrimental to the welfare- of-the community." Though the question elicits the opinion of the Planning Commission, an unemotional and honest assessment of the project . leads to the conclusion that this project is neither obnoxious nor detrimental to the welfare of the and, in fact, . the project will enhance the welfare of the community and help Kodiak solve its housing shortage. The use. permit should be issued pursuant to KIB §17.30.040. However, if the Commission_ declines to so act, the application is submitted in the alterna- tive, as described above. Under KIB Code- 517.30:060 additional uses may be permitted "where such uses are deemed essential or- desirable to the public convenience or welfare, and.are in harmony with the,.. various elements' or objectives of the comprehensive .Borrough„ plan. and this title.." ; The project fails within two subsections . of this section, government == enterprises. and: group housing. development: The . discussion ''regarding :publically owned buildings „and. property. addresses: the issues ;gerittane to government enterprises and it seems unnecessary to repeat -it.. • The code sets . forth numerous cond itions ;that. =are to be addressed when'reviewing _ a- proposed group - housing development. It is our posi=tion that -the plans: for this project ',fully comply:. with the code.::':: We - would' emphasize that the "residen - t al density of this-- ject -do'es .not -- exceed, the density anticipated,` for R 2: zoned property... This project Will not *increase the, utilization of the land,- . streets, . or other.: services, beyond- that anticipated in the comprehensive plan The arrangement of the housing units into multi-unit buildings is necessary,= because of construction,:Operating and maintenance expenses. -.However, this arrangement does not contravene the comprehensive- plan or the zoning code _.`and the project. 'should' be approved :; In :conclusion, ;KIHA is requesting the issuance of an additional use ;permit, toprovide for construction of' :a 48- unit multi, family housing project on the above described property: 'The_ proposed project, falls within the parameters= of three provisions of-the code and the request is submitted as to each provision in the alternative. _ The. project ' plans, as -amended,,comply with Borough, State and Federal-,_ requirements The project will help alleviate, the critical. housing shortage. in Kodiak. This commission should approve the issuance of an additional use:�permi"t so that construction-. of the project can begin : in a -timely; fashion.- June 16, 1981 Kodiak Island Borough Kodiak, Alaska RECEIVED JUN 161981 P 14 Mr. Arnie Hat/ 1 Acting Manage Kodiak Island Borough P. 0. Box 1246 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Dear Arnie: I'm writing to advise you of a point of clarification regard- ing the City Council's action concerning the annexation of the Kodiak Island Housing Authority's request. As you are aware, in the second reading the Council defeated the annex- ation request. This action was taken because the Planning and Zoning Commission had not granted a waiver for multi- unit construction in an R -2 zone. Please be advised, however, that the City does not wish the Borough to consider their non - annexation as voicing an objection to the entire program presented by the Housing Authority. On the contrary, once the Borough zoning require- ments have been met by, the Housing Authority, the Council has expressed a willingness to reconsider its decision at that time. Certainly, if a property were to be annexed by the City of Kodiak, it would be entitled to receipt of water and sewer connections as any other city property would be. I would appreciate your passing this letter on to the Borough Assembly in their assembly packet prior to your July 2nd meeting. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Respectfully yours, CITY OF KODIAK ooW • ••■ GORDON W. RYAN City Manager GWR /tnw POST OFFICE BOX 1397, KODIAK . ALASKA 99615 PHONE (907) 486-3.224 KODIAK ISLAND HOUSING AUTHORITY P.O. BOX 197 - KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 - (907) 486-5721 April 15, 1981 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH Planning &-.Zoning Commission P.O. Box 886 Kodiak, AK 99615 Gentlepeople, Subject: Tracts B & E, Kadiak Subdivision The Kodiak Island Housing Authority requests to build 48 units of multi - family housing on the above subject site. The schematic :drawings are available for your review. We are available to discuss our project during your work session of April 29 and seek your concurrance of our proposal during your next regular meeting. Please refer to KIB Zoning Regulations: a) 17.30.040 b) 17.30.060(8) c) 17.30.060(18) It is of our opinion that we comply with all local, state, and federal regulations pertaining to this development. Thank you for your time in this matter. TA:jac Sincerely, Tom Azum 4Lrector Executi KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH MEMORANDUM DATE: May 13, 1981 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Community Development Department a‘'4'4"d6r4.1 SUBJ: Staff Report • RE: Case Z-81-010. Request for an exception from Sections 17.30.040, 17.30.060(8) and 17.30.060(18) to permit Kodiak Island Housing Authority to build 48 units on Tracts B. and E, Kadiak Alaska Subdivision. (Kodiak Island Housing Authority/Tom Azumbrado) REQUEST Kodiak Island Housing Authority is seeking exceptions from certain portions of the Kodiak Island Borough Code to permit the construction of 48 units of housing, in an R-2 two family residential district. Although..the total number of units proposed does not exceed the requirements of the R-2 district, the construction of the dwelling units in any form other than duplexes or single family residences requires an exception. PROPERTY The property involved consists of two parcels, separated by Woody Circl. Tract B contains 79,440 square feet and Tract E has 93,690 square feet of area. The total area involved is 173,130 square feet or 3.97 acres. LAND USE The 1968 ComprehensiVe Plan recommends "medium density residential" for the area concerned with this request and, on page 42, suggests that R-1 and R-2 zoning are the districts involved and common build- ing types are single family residential and duplexes. The proposed 1978 Plan by KCM recommends medium density residential land usage and lists it as a "high priority" development area. The area involved is zoned R-2 residential. It was previously zoned I-industrial and rezoned R-2 on January 12, 1979, by Ordinance 78-30-0. Memorandum, C( Z-81-010 Page 2 May 13, 1981 Existing land uses in the immediate area are the Lutheran Church and the Community College. DISCUSSION Because the Housing Authority desires to construct building types other than single family or duplex residential units the need for an exception or exceptions arises. The applicant has requested 3 exceptions which are further discussed as follows: 1. Section 17.30.040. states "the use of buildings and property publicly owned and engaged in the performance of a public function may be permitted in any district provided that such use is not, in the opinion of the planning commission, obnoxious or detrimental to the welfare of the community." The Kodiak Island Housing Authority is a public agency according to a Borough Attorney's opinion dated October 9, 1979. The question-before the Commission then is: is the proposed use obnoxious or detrimental to the welfare of the community? 2. Section 17.30.060(8). Addresses additional permitted uses. Number 8 is "Government enterprises (federal, state or local). In considering additional uses, Section117,30.060 states that the commission can permit such uses if they "...are deemed essential or desirable to the public convenience or welfare, and are in harmony with the various elements or objectives of the comprehensive borough plan and this title." 3. Section 17.30.060(18). Also addresses additional permitted uses. Number 18 is "Group Housing Development" which contains 10 specific performance standards which must be met. The previous citation on public convenience, welfare and harmony also applies. 4. Section 17.66.040 is germain to the discussion as it contains the overall considerations for exceptions and states that the proposal shall not "tend...to...endanger in any way the public health, safety or general welfare or produce results inconsistent with the general purposes and intent of this title..." Most of the Commission required consideration are summarized as follows in the form of questions: Section 17.30.040 1. Is the proposed use, in your opinion, obnoxious to the welfare of the community? 2. Is the proposed use, in your opinion, detrimental to the wel- fare of the community? Memorandum, Page 3 May 13, 1981 Section 17.30.060(8) 3. Do you deem the proposal to be essential to the public convenience? 4. Do you deem the proposal to be desireable to the public convenience? 5. Do you deem the proposal to be essential to the public welfare? 6. Do you deem the proposal to be desireable to the public welfare? 7. Is the proposal in harmony with the elements of objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? 8. Is the proposal in harmony with the elements or objectives of Title 17? Section 17.66.040 9. In your opinion, will the proposal tend to endanger, in any way the public health? 10. In your opinion, will the proposal tend to endanger, in any way the public safety? 11. In your opinion, will the proposal tend to endanger, in any way the public welfare? 12. In your opinion, will the proposal produce results inconsistent with the general purposes of Title 17? 13. In your opinion, will the proposal produce results inconsistent with the general intent of Title 17? PROPOSAL Before anwsers to the previous questions are formulated the proposal needs to be examined in the light of the requirements contained in Section 17.30.060(18) Group. Housing Developments. The project as proposed consists of three townhouse.structures containing eight units apiece and three 8 plex structures for a total count of 48 dwelling units. The dwelling unit tabulation is as follows: Number of units Type of Unit Bedroom Totals 21 two bedroom 42 19 three bedroom 57 8 four bedroom 32 48* 131 Memorandum, Cad -'. -81 -010 Page 4 May 13, 1981 ti• *Two units are designed for handicapped persons. Offstreet parking is shown at 76 spaces. 96 are required by code. It is difficult to tell from the site plan submitted if handicapped parking has been provided at the location of the handicapped units. If they have been they need to be marked on the plan and meet federal guidelines for the extra width and access ramps. A community center and laundry facility is shown as is one "tot lot ". With 48 units, 144 residents could be present if one uses 3.0 persons per unit as a multiplier. Bedrooms would be a better figure to use for total population estimates. 131 bedrooms, at 2 persons per bedroom, yeilds a population of 262. The point here is that a substantial portion of the anticipated population will be children and hence another "tot lot" provided. Section 17.30.060(18)(a requires "That a proposed dwelling group will constitute a residential environment of sustained desirability and stability; that it will be in harmony with the character of the surrounding neigh- borhood; that it will result in intensity of land utilization no higher, and standards of open space at least as high, as permitted or specified in this title in the district in which the proposed dwelling group is located." The proposal will create a residential neighborhood. The land .: utilization (density) is not higher than that allowed in R -2 districts and the open space shown exceeds requirements. Section 17.30.060(18)(b) requires "That the tract of land on which the dwelling group is to be erected comprises at least seventy -five thousand square feet." The tracts of land involved contain 173,130 square feet of area. Section 17.30.060(18)(c) requires "That the buildings are to be used only for residential purposes and the customary accessory uses, such as garages, storage space and recreational and community activities." The buildings are proposed as residential structures without garages.. A community center is also proposed. Section 17.30.060(18)(d) requires "That the average lot area per dwelling unit on the site, exclusive of the area occupied by streets, will not be less than the lot area required for each dwelling unit in the district in which the dwelling group is to be located." The lot area requirements of Section 17.18.030 (4) is involved with this performance standards where it states "for a multiple - family dwelling with eight or more dwelling units, one thousand six hundred square feet per dwelling unit." For 48 units, all contained in 8 unit structures as proposed, 76,800 square feet of Memorandum, Ca !-81-010 Page 5 May 13, 1981 area is needed. Since 173,130 square feet are available this standard is fulfilled. Section 17.30.060(18)(e) requires "That there are provided, as part of the proposed development, adequate recreation areas to serve the needs of the anticipated population." As discussed previously another Htot lot" should be considered. Section 17.30.060(18)(f) requires "That offstreet parking is provided on the basis of one parking space for each dwelling unit within the development." The Borough's offstreet parking and loading were revised by Ordinance 81-18-0 which became effective on May 1, 1980. The new requirement is 2 spaces per dwelling unit. The proposed site plan can be revised to reflect the required amount of parking. Section 17.30.060(18)(g) requires "That the development will not produce a volume of traffic in excess of the capacity for which the access streets are designed." The platted. streets, Woody Way and Woody Circle, should be designed for construction to handle this proposal plus the others which will occur in this largely undeveloped area. Using a multiplier of 2 vehicles per unit, 96 pieces of equipment could be present. Residential developments, like the proposal, typically generate 4 trips per unit per day or 192 trips. Section 17.30.060(18)(h) requires "That property adjacent to the proposed dwelling group will not be adversely affected." Adjacent property is owned by the Lutheran Church and the State of Alaska (Community College). Section 17.30.060(18)(i) requires "That such dwelling group not be located in an industrial district." The area proposed for development is located in an R-2 District. Section 17.30.060(18)(j) requires "That the proposed group housing development will be.consistent with the intent and purpose of this title to promise public health, safety and general welfare." Typical consideration for public health, safety and welfare are the availability of services, the amount of traffic generated, nuisance factors such as anticipated pet population, access to the rest of the community, natural or manmade hazards, etc. Memorandum, Ca' '�Z -81 -010 Rage 6 May 13, 1981 This "run through" of group housing performance standards shows that the proposal meets, exceed, or can meet, items a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, and i. Items h and j may still be in question. HISTORY In addition to everything else you are being asked to consider in reaching a decision on this case, a short history of other actions is in order as follows: 1. On July 31, 1979, a.;staff report was prepared for Case 0 -79 -037. That case dealt with a request from the KANA Housing Authority to purchase Tracts B and E, Kadiak Alaska Subdivision from the Borough; 2. At its August 15, 1979, meeting the Commission passed two motions concerning Case 0 -79 -037. The first motion stated: Mrs. Crowe moved to reaffirm to the Borough Assembly that the land be resubdivided and sold at a public auction. Seconded by Mr. Erwin. Mr. Pugh would like to propose an amendment that states that if the Borough. Assembly finds that it is financially impossible and /or the vacant lot subdivided and provide the proper facilities to these tracts within a two month period then Tracts B and E of Kadiak Subdivision be sold immediately at a public auction. Seconded by Mr. Ball. Motion PASSED with a 4 -1 vote Mr. Erwin voted NO, and all other commissioner's voted YES. The second motion stated: Mrs. Crowe moved to reaffirm to the Borough Assembly that the land be resubdivided and sold a a public auction. Seconded by Mr. Erwin. Motion PASSED. with a 4 -1 vote. Mr. Erwin vote NO and all other commissioner's voted YES. 3. On May 15, 1980, the Borough and the KANA Housing Authority entered into an agreement entitled "Cooperation Agreement Between KodiakiIsland Borough and KANA Housing Authority: "; 4. On October 29, 1980, the Borough submitted a preapplication to the HUD Area Office in Anchorage for $400,000 to accomplish a water and sewer project for 54 KANA Housing Authority units for low and moderate income persons, provide,tbike trails, provide a head start building and work on village sanitation projects; 5. On November 6, 1980, the Borough Assembly passed Resolution 80 -55 -R, which made Tracts B and E available to the Housing Authority for 10% of their fair market value; 6. On December 3, 1980, the Borough transferred a quitclaim deed for Tracts B and E to the Housing Authority in accordance with Resolution 80 -55 -R; and Memorandum, 4c--:Z-81-010 Page 7 May 13, 1981 7. On April 10, 1981, a final application was submitted to HUD Anchorage for a grant in the amount of $200,000 for the accomplish- ment of a sewer project for the Housing Authority project on Tracts B and E. SUMMARY: The basic performance standards required for "group housing" have been met. A series of external events have occurred which lead one to the conclusion that Tracts B and E have been chosen for the Housing Authority's proposal. Location is a key to this evenings consideration. Is this the best location for 6 structures contain- ing 8 dwelling units apiece? Is "scattered site" public housing better? Answers exist on both sides of the question of course and can only be handled by individual decision makers. We are left with the following questions to ponder in reaching a decision on this request_for an exception: 1. In your opinion, is the proposal obnoxious or detrimental to the welfare of the community? (Section 17.30.040); 2. In your opinion, is the proposal essential or desireable to public convenience and welfare? (Section 17.30.060(8)); 3. Is the proposal, in your opinion, in harmony with the elements or objectives of the Comprehensive plan and Title 17? (Section 17.30.060(8)); 4. In your opinion, will the proposal tend to endanger, in any way, the pUblic health, safety or welfare? (Section 17.66.040) 5. In your opinion, will the proposal produce results inconsistent with the general purposes and intent of Title 17? (Section 17.66.040); 6. In your opinion, will adjacent property be adversely affected? (Section 17.30.060(18)(h)); and 7. In your opinion, will the proposal be consistent with the intent and purpose of Title 17 to promise public health, safety, and general welfare? (Section 17.30.060(18)(j)); If you answer yes to questions 1, 4, 5, or 6, or No to questions 2, 3, or 7, you can deny the request for an exception. Another alternative would be to approve the request for an exception to Section 17.30.060(18), with conditions, such as: 1. Property be annexed to the,City of Kodiak; 2. Site plan be revised to show 96 offstreet parking spaces/to indicate handicapped parking stalls, to indicate the location of handicapped access ramps, to inculde an additional "tot lot", and be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission; 3. A site plan for each "tot lot" be prepared indicating surface material, type and location of play equipment and size and be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning Comthission; Memorandum, C`'" ,.Z -8.1 -010 Page 8 May 13, 1981 4. A time table be prepared for the Planning and Zoning Commission on the construction of the community facility;_ 5. Grading, drainage and erosion control plans be approved by the City Engineer; and 6. Security and exterior lighting systems be reviewed and approved by the Kodiak Police Department. KODIAK ISLAND HOUSING AUTHORITY PA. BOX 197 - KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 . (907) 486.5721 January 16, 1981 Kodiak Island Borough Assembly P.O. Box 1246 Kodiak, AK 99615 Dear Assembly Members, SUBJECT: Multi - Family Housing on Tracts B & E Kadiak Subdivision Apparently there is some misunderstanding concerning our multi - family housing project. I want to quell any rumors that allude to the Authority changing the project's intent as previously presented to the Assembly. My memo (August 4, 1980) to the Assembly stated that we want to build approximately 50 units of housing. It further stated that we intend to build a combination of townhouses and walkups in small clusters. Community facilities, i.e. day care, community room and administration, are also to be included if budget allows. These items are still outlined in our program to the architect. The present R -2 zoning permits 48 units of multi - family housing, under the Planned Unit Development (PUD) category. If Woody Circle was vacated, we could build 54 units (KIB Code 17.30.060 -18). It would be ideal,to vacate Woody way for both design and zoning considerations. The Lutheran Church indicated that they want the option to sell tract "C" at a later time. From an architectural viewpoint, we would prefer to replat a 60 foot wide strip between Tract "E"-and "D ", and vacate the-existing Woody Circle. The new strip could act as 'a buffer between the housing and-church-, :This isn't required though in order to have a successful project, and if the Lutheran Church objects, we won't:proceed in that direction. HUD has authorized and funded the Kodiak Island Housing Authority to build 54 units of housing. The Authority seeks to build the 54 units with community facilities. We exceed the R -2 PUD requirements by 6 units. We are able to build the 54 units under R -2 classification via KIB" Codes 17.30.040 and 17.30.060(8), which allow publicly owned Kodiak Isla .Borough Assembly January 16, 1981 page. 2 buildings, engaged in the performance of a public function, to be permitted in any district as long as they are not obnoxious or detrimental to the welfare of the community; or we can build 54 units under a rezoned R -3 classification. Our program illustrates that there will be no drastic change to density levels. The Borough Planner recommended that the Planning and Zoning Commission approve our request. Our request was denied by the P & Z Commission, for reasons which I think have no legal basis. 1) School buffer needed. The project is approximately 2,600 feet from East Elementary School. Both the College and Fir Terrace are closer. Rezonoff is the major road for heavy traffic. The housing will feed into it from Woody Way. Site selection was based on the fact that we wouldn't congest minor roads and existing neighborhoods, yet still be close to schools. The Community College supports the project. 2) Complaints from property owners by phone. I asked the Planning Department to tell me the individuals names, but they didn't know. Comments for a public hearing, whether by phone, letter or in person should identify the speaker, so that I can address their concerns and objections. How is the project detrimental? 3) Construction of Woody Way would increase traffic. Woody way is already platted. The construction of it complies with the Borough's plans for development. If the traffic patterns are detrimental, the road should have been previously vacated, before the Borough sold Tracts A,B, &-E. We don't intend to construct a road more than required for access to our property. 4) Kadiak first addition is zoned R -3 for future growth. Zoning can allow for more than one area of particular development. Our project's density doesn't contradict existing development patterns. The adjacent infrastructure can easily handle the 54 units. We have sought to design and develop this project within the constraints and per the ideals of the Borough's plans. The Authority requests that the Assembly allow us to build the 54 units as originally envisioned, either by rezoning the parcels to R -3 or authorizing us to use KIB Codes 17.30.040 and 17.30.060(8). Sincerely, Tom A..mbrado Execu e Director TA / j ac Chapter 17.30 GENERAL USE REGULATIONS 17.30.040 Publicly owned buildings and property. The ;use of buildings and' poperty publicly owned and engaged in the performance of a public function may be permitted in any district provided that such use is not, in the opinion of the planning commission, obnoxious or detrimental to the welfare of the community. (Prior code Ch. 5 subch. 2 §10B(4)). Chapter 17.30- GENERAL USE REGULATIONS 17.30.060 Additional uses permitted. A. The borough planning commission may, after. proper notice and public hearing, permit the following exceptions in any district, except a dis- trict zoned for watershed use, unless otherwise herein speci- fied, where such uses are deemed essential or desirable to the public convenience or welfare, and are in harmony with the Ivarious elements or objectives of the comprehensive borough (plan and this title. In approving the uses referred to in this section, the borough planning commission shall have the lauthority to impose such conditions and safeguards as it deems necessary to protect the best interests of the surround- ing property or neighborhood and the comprehensive borough plan and this title: 8. Government enterprises (federal, state or local); Chapter 17.30 GENERAL USE REGULATIONS 17.30.060 Additional uses permitted. 18. Group housing developments: In the case of a dwelling group consisting of two or more buildings, the • contemplated arrangement of which makes it impracticable to apply the requirements of this title to the individual building units in the group,'exceptions may be issued only if the plans of such.dwelling group comply with the follow- ing conditions: a. That the proposed dwelling group will consti- tute a residential environment of sustained desirability and stability; that it will be in harmony with the character of the surrounding neighborhood; that it will result in intensity of land utilization no higher, and standards of open space at least as high, as permitted or specified in this title in the district in which the proposed dwelling group is located; b. That the tract of land on which the dwelling group is to be erected comprises at least seventy-five thou- sand square feet; c. That the buildings are to be used only for resident±al,purposes and the customary accessory uses, such as garages, storage spaces and recreational and community activities, d. That the average lot area per dwelling unit on the site, exclusive of the area occupied by streets, will not be less than the lot area required for each dwelling unit' in the district in which the dwelling group is to be located, e. That there are provided, as part of the pro- posed development, adequate recreation areas to serve the needs of the anticipated population, f. That off-street parking is provided,on the basis of one parking space for each dwelling unit within the development, g. That the development will not produce a volume of traffic in excess of the capacity for which the access streets are designed, h. That property adjacent to the proposed 'dwelling group will not be adversely affected, i. That such dwelling group not be located in an industrial district, j. That the proposed group housing _development will be consistent with the intent and purpose of this title to promise public health, safety and general welfare; Chapter 17.66. EXCEPTIONS, VARIANCES AND APPEALS' 17.66.040 Exceptions--Granting or denial. Within forty days after the receipe of an application, the planning commission shall render its decision. If it is the opinion of the commission, after consideration of,the report of such investigation, that the use as proposed in the appli- cation, or under appropriate restrictions or conditions, will not endanger the public health, safety or genera1 welfare, or be inconsistent with the general purposes ancl ' intent of this title, the Commission shall approve the application with or without conditions. If the proposed use will tend, in the opinion of the Commission, to en- danger in any way the public health, safety or general !welfare or produce results inconsistent with the general -purposes and intent-of this title, the Commission shall deny the application. (Prior code Ch. 5 subch. 2 1?21A (1)(c)). Ofc 2 2 1980 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH Telephones 486-5736 - 486-5737 — Box 1246 KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 December 18, 1980 Kodiak Island Housing Authority Tom Azumbrado, Executive Director Box 197 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 RE: A request to rezone Tracts B & E, Kadiak Subdivision from R-2 to R-3 and an amend- ment to the ComprehenSive Land Use Plan from medium density residential to high density residential. Dear Mr. AzuMbrado, Your rezoning request on the above referenced property was denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission during their regular meeting held on December 17, 1980 for the following reasons: 1. school buffer needed 2. complaints from property owners by phone 3. construction of Woody Way would increase traffic 4. Kadiak First Addition is zoned R-3 for future growth The Commission's action may be appealed to the.Borough Assembly seated as a Board of Adjustment within ten (10) days of the Commission's action. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact the Planning Department at 486-5736. Sincerely, oanne M. Jones Planning Secretary )1Q-)0 -. • TOOIC Recording QUITCLAP.! DEED The Grantor, KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH, organized and existing pursuant to the laws of the State of Alaska as a second class borough, for and in consideration of the sum of ONE DOLLAR (51.00) and other good and . valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknolwedged and confirmed, hereby conveys and Quitclaims to the KODIAK ISLAND HOUSING AUTHORITY, INC. the whole of its right, title and interest, if any in the following described real estate: Tracts B and E of KADIAK ALASKA SUBDIVISION located in the Kodiak Recording District, State of Alaska. This deed is given pursuant to authority of_apsolution 80-55-R as passed by the Kodiak Island Borough Assembly and as further provided in Title 18.20.1008 of the KOdiak Island Borough Code Assemblyand as further provided in Title 18.20.1005 of the Kodiak Island Borough-Code of Ordinances (Ord. No. 80-28-0) and is subject to the conditions of said resolution. DATED this ) ATTEST:. • • -it' - '..Boro Clerk : )1 STATE OFALASKA ) ssi: THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT ) day of , 1980 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH THIS IS TO CERTIFY that on the ._;57---e- day of „ ,!.re 1980, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Alaska, duly commissioned and sworn as such, personally appeared Danforth Ogg, Mayor, known to me to be the individual who executed the within instrument and acknowledged to me that the same was signed freely and voluntarily for the uses and purposes therein stated. WITNESS my hand and notarial seal the day and'year'first above written. Notary Public in and for Alaska - My commission expires:• myC471:ssonEwm, ' • ' • • 7- , • • -z-v-s • • ' , • •. • . , . . • KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH RESOLUTION NO. 80 -55 -R A RESOLUTION OF TILE KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ASSEMBLY RATIFYING CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT FOR SALE OF TRACTS B AND E, KODIAK ALASKA SUBDIVISION TO THE KODIAK ISLAND HOUSING AUTHORITY. WHEREAS, on September 4, 1980 at their regular meeting the Kodiak Island Borough Assembly approved an amended motion 5 -1; the motion reads as follows: Tracts B and E of the Kadiak Alaska Subdivision be made available to the Kodiak Island Housing Authority at ten (10 %) percent of their fair market value and the Kodiak Island Housing Authority shall be responsible for the construction of Woody Way as an access to Tracts 8 and E, and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 80 -28 -0, Section 18.20.030(b) requires a resolution certifying this action. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED this Resolution No. 80 -55 -R does • ratify the above- stated action of the Kodiak Island Borough Assembly on September 4, 1980. ATTEST:..;' ' L't'. PASSED AND APPROVED this 6th day of November • , 1980. Borough Clerk 11i KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH By Borough Ptayor ll KODIAK ISLAND 't OR UGH Telephones 486 -5736 - 486 -5737 — Box 1246 KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 October 14, 1980 Tom Azumbrado, Executive Director Kodiak Island Housing Authority P.O. Box 197 Kodiak, AK 99615 Dear Mr. Azumbrado, I have reviewed your proposal to build approximately fifty units of multi - family housing on Tracts B and E in the Kadiak Subdivision. Your proposal complies with the KIB's Regional Plan and Development Strategy, the OEDP and the OCS Impact Study. Considering the facts that the Borough Assembly sold the land to the Public Housing Authority for multi- family housing, that low and middle income housing is a much needed priority, that the identified parcels are ideal for such a development, and that the Zoning Title allows exceptions for publicly owned buildings (KIB Code 17.30:040 and 17.30.060 8), I am recommending that the P & Z Commission approve your request to change the zoning from R -2 to R -3. Sincerely, d4:644A-eJ:W. Beck Borough Planner r'sEP 5 1980 nifett 71Arofiverhookti uf Tarpenterz. mar Toiners INSTITUTED OF AMERICA AUGUST 12.1681 LOCAL UNION NO. 2162 P. O. Box No. 967 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 (907) 486-3331 Sep.tenzLeiz. 3 7980 KadLah .74/and gguzi_n.g. Bax 197 Kadi-ah, Ri_aziza 99615 Re; Law Cazt gau4i.n23.zoj.e.ct Due tc, ext./Lenz zhaittage..4 houzi_ng -in Kodiak, i-F1, rary4t 4 tke. ctLzn diala can agand we 4 thi..6 catjani_zcztian 4tizang4 u/19.2. that t4i..6 12/zap-et Le. goven. tap Cfrz.pen.ten-es Local 2762 4 Kadiah 4.7`...zon.g41 wz.g.e the ci..tg and .8.a/zoagh eue.ag carz.ea:dezu2ti.an Kana the zonztizaction 4 t4.L 4 pacet, ta h.se./2 /Letieue the zhaiztage 4 hauzin.g. oa Kadi-ah 4,-and. -14 a. much needed przaiect, and .6hauid .conAbtacted hout /.z.ziztheiz. detaci_. Kano has th-e .corilstex-e zu.p.pant 4 thi..6 onfardzation e .conzizZet-Lan. 4 thi.,6 gaufzz SeJz.t6JTaL Przeoi_dent Gizip.enf-e4,6 Lazai 2162 Box 967 Kodiak, liea.oha 99615 8 -22 -80 Mt. Tom Azumbtado, Deputy V.itteetot Kodiak I4!and Ho using Authority Box 197 Kodiak, AFz. 99615 Dean_ Mt. Azumbtado : Box 315 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Dennis Murray Project Director Tel. 486 -5630 Re: Support o4 additional housing - option 4ot elderly in the community The boattd of d.utectou and I had a chance to tev,iew youtt £ettetc at out Augurt 21st meeting. Wet much dizcuzz ion o4 the cutvicent how Lng optionz ava.itab/e to the etde't y in the community o4 Kodiak the boattd voted to endou e your e44onts to obtain additional units with the 4oftowing cond.%tiows. They are: 1) The boated ke.Pz that thence doe exist a gap in the ava ttbit ty o4 houz ing 4ot peon peAzonz on modettate and i.ixed ,income. Patrt-icutakty, the boated .is aware that both Kodiak Plaza and FiA Tetvtace o44etc dome units to this group 6,4 individuat.A, but the 4upp!y Ls inadequate. Thetepte, the board supports guide i.ne which azzizt pett,?onz and 4amitie uuth .income•? just above the section 8 tent zuppPemevvt gw%de Lne. Pon. a one petrzon 4amity that would be $750 /mo--- $1,200 /mo range. 2) Anothett area o4 concettn which the boatd would tike youtc otgan-izat.ion to addkezz in yowl_ houz,ing plan .its that o4 pAioAitizat -.on o4 eder.2y apptLcantz ass they negate to other gtoup4 within the gene/tat popw?ation. It hat, been the cente'!4 experience that etdetrty app.P.,icant'? 4ometime have to wait in tine behind othett app.e cav-ts . The etdetr ly ate L L- egwiped to aggte4.ivey advocate 4ot theft pozition on the waiting .e izt. Con.sequentty, the boattd wishe Kana to initiate a pte4ettence chains e in the.itc houz.ing agreement with . HUa which mitt azzute etdetrty the east iezt opportunity to occupy a unit. 3) Anothett problem which the center ha3 encountetted ,i6 that o4 units which addtes the particutatt phyz.ica . needs o4 the etderly pehson with chronic dizabi itie. The only houz.ing which cutvtentty o44eitz zpecial 4eatutte {got the eldetrty and handicapped iz 13ayv.iew Tetvtace Apatr tmen z . Thous e 4 eatute .include tai ling s in the h a Uwa yes , an etevatot, .lowetted cabinets, grab bars in the bathvwomA, etc. Any newly conztAucted howling which ,intends to ptov,ide units 4ot the eldetr l y Ahmed ,include thee. deign err itenia 40t those unit. Punthet, thence ,is a need 4ott units deigned with two bedtooms with adjoining baths 4ot etdetly couple where the zpoute has chronic problems which necezz Late z epattate quartets,. 4) One o4 the pro b.lem4 which the center has abso encoun tested in its e44ott4 to a3zrst etdenPy in housing atvtangemen z haA been the cwftuna.P ptobfem4 associate with apartment timing in a .lwtge complex. The board Uee.6 it .u? ,i.mpontant to ptov.ide hows.ing in B.ond.i t,%on4 c(1 vUnued Box 315 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Dennis Murray Project Director Tel. 486 -5630 page 2 4) smatter aurteu (dup.2ex, 1 owrptex, 4.ixpeex) . It would be the hope o4 the board .hut 'Kano wowed addke6A .h.iz option in than. dev e.2o pm en.. The baand and I thank you 4on the oppontun ty to pnay..de input and zuppont to yaw: e44ants on beha.24 o4 Kodiaia'6 e,2de ty citizen's. S- nce:e2y, W. -Anne VaZtey, pn y KODIAK ISLAND HOUSING AUTHORITY P.O. BOX 197 - KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 . (907) 486-5721 MEMORANDUM To: Kodiak Island Borough Assembly From. Tom Azumbrado, Deputy Director Date: August 4, 1980 Subject: Information demonstrating need for low income housing within Kodiak and the Kodiak Island Housing Authority's proposal to address the problem. VERIFICATION OF NEED: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Assessment (1979) capsul- ized previous studies and plans pertaining to housing within the Borough. It states that: "Availability of housing has been indicated as a major issue in the Kodiak area in the Outer Continental Shelf Impact Study, the Regional Plan and Development Strategy, and the Overall, Economic Development Plan. Major housing problems include a small existing housing stock, low vacancy rates, a large proportion of substandard units, and high cost." "Housing in Kodiak is in short supply and housing costs are high. All previous studies of Kodiak have concluded that housing is a major problem area. The Outer Continental Shelf Study (1977) concluded that 'Housing has the potential for being the most serious problem facing Kodiak within the next five years' (p.124). The Regional Plan and Development Strategy (1978) found that 'The Current shortage of housing emerged as a major concern . .' (p.34). This study found that overcrowding and bad housing conditions have resulted from the shortage and that some residents have built their own hous- ing (p.35). The strongest comments on the effects of the housing shortage are found in the Overall Economic Development Plan (1979), which stated: 1 . . . there has been a chronic (and increasing) shortage of housing units available in the Borough during the past decade. Housing units that do come onto the market are highly priced and are often out of the effective purchasing range of many workers. The lack of available housing has probably caused Kodiak Island Be jh Assembly August 4, 1980 Page 2 more single workers to come to Kodiak and thus acted to discourage the in-migration of married workers with families. A third factor also relates to the lack of adequate housing. Due to the housing shortage, several of the food processing plants in the Borough have been providing dormitory space for their workers.' "The Regional Plan and Development Strategy (Kramer, Chin & Mayo, Inc., (1978) assessed the price of housing and local wages in order to determine affordability. This report concluded that: 'Only some 10% of Kodiak households can afford large-lot, single-family housing. Another 40% can afford older housing on smaller lots, mobile homes, or apartment rentals. A full 50% of households would appear to have difficulty finding housing on the private market.'" The Alaska Department of Community & Regional Affairs' Report On The Bottomfish Industry (1979) concluded that "The shortage of ade- quate and affordable housing constitutes a significant impediment to future bottomfish development in the area." Their discussions with City and Borough officials (February, 1979) reiterates that "only 8% to 10% of the population can afford new housing and 51% of Kodiak households had annual incomes too low to afford: * An older house * A mobile home * Adequate family-size apartment space This is confirmed by current data from the KIB's building department which indicates that housing construction has declined rather than kept even with the population growth. As of July 31, 1980, Pacific Terrace reports a waiting list of 40 applicants. Fir Terrace has 85 applicants waiting for housing. Senior citizens report the need for housing. The Alaska Department of Public Assistance has contacted the KIHA concerning the lack of affordable housing for Kodiak residents. Conversations with clergy, local services, canneries and construction trades all confirm the short and long term benefits of providing more low income housing. THE KIHA'S DEVELOPMENT PLAN Within this context, the KIHA: 1.) Has acquired the U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development c. Kodiak Island Borough Assembly August 4, 1980 Page 3 funding for approximately 50 additional units of housing. 2.) We have acquired a Cooperation Agreement from the Borough. 3.) We have performed a site selection investigation, and deter- mined that Tracts B and E, Kadiak Alaska Subdivision, are adaptable to the Borough's Land Use Plan, are economically feasible to develop, and offer amenities to residents without disturbing existing properties.' (Please see attached site plan.) We would be able to finance efficient and expedient development of the land to a greater extent than the Borough or private development. 4.) The Borough's lawyer, in a letter to the KIB Planning Department (Oct. 9, 1979), confirmed that "The Borough may convey the land to the Housing Authority for less than fair market value as specified in As.29.48.260 (b) and KIB code 18.20.020. 5.) Acquiring the land at minimal cost would allow us to provide a quality infrastructure and housing units per our housing program. 6.) The architectural program would emphasize: * Apartments for large families, elderly * Minimal maintenance * Landscaping * Security * Privacy * Parking * Community facilities, i.e. day care, community room, admin- istration. At this time we propose to provide a combination of townhouses and walkups in small clusters. We intend to achieve a non-urban, non- institutional look. This wooded, sloping site would allow this much better than other sites. The proximity to elementary schools, the Community College, churches, major roads are all beneficial to multi-family housing needs. 7.) The KIHA was established by State statute as a public corporate body having all the powers and limitations specified for the Alaska State Housing Authority. While we are a corporate entity distinct from the State, because we act for the benefit of the public gener- ally and perform governmental functions, we are regarded as part of the State for KIB code 18.20.020. (Per Borough's attorney, Thomas F. Klinker.) We have previously demonstrated an ability to build and manage hous- ing. The Borough has the security of knowing that the KIHA has the permanence and commitment to the Borough and its people. c Kodiak Island B igh Assembly August 4, 1980 Page 4 8.) Once we acquire the land, we would immediately proceed with design and construction. The volumn of work would help alleviate the economic slump the local construction industry faces. 9.) The tentative time schedule: Acquisition of land September, 1980 Final drawings, etc. January, 1981 Bid and award of contract February, 1981 Completion May, 1982 10.) Income and family size are the determinents for eligibility. It is open to all ethnic backgrounds. Renter eligibility would be similar to the KIBSD's reduced price for meals and milk. FAMILY SIZE ANNUAL FAMILY INCOME 1 9,000 2 12,000 3 15,000 4 17,500 5 21,000 6 23,000 7 26,000 8 29,000 Rent would be figured on a sliding scale of approximately 25% of gross family income. This encourages the family to seek the private housing market once their income allows them to be a part of it, There would be minimal competition with the private housing sector. The family size and income level requirements would help many of the Borough's present residents and encourage family in-migration over single workers in settling here. If there are any questions pertaining to this project,'of which I may have knowledge, please feel free to contact me. Thank you for your review and consideration of this proposal. AUG' 5 1980 Kodiak Womens -Resource Center Crisis Line Phone 486 - 3625 Business Phone 486 - 5038 Post Office Box 2122 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 1 August 1980 Mr. Tom Azumbrado Deputy Director Kodiak Island Housing Authority P. 0. Box 197 Kodiak, AK. 99615 Dear Mr. Azumbrado: The Kodiak Women's Resource Center greatly supports the proposal of the Kodiak island Housing Authority to provide much needed housing in Kodiak. During the past six months the Kodiak Women's Resource Center has received over twenty inquiries regarding housing in this area. The majority of these informational calls are from women who are raising children by themselves. There is also very little housing available to battered women who have left their violent homes and are attempting to find housing for themselves and their children. The lack of adequate housing and the lack of housing which is affordable to single parent families is very much needed in Kodiak. We wish you 'success with your project. cerely, -*r OAWM7-14, Kay G. Ackerman Director KGA/ock A Chartered Chapter of The National Council on Alcoholism Alaska Region, A State Division of the National Council on Alcoholism Kodiak July 31, 1980 Tom Azumbrado, Deputy Director Kodiak Island Housing Authority Box 197 Kodiak, AK 99615 Dear Tom: AUG 1 1980 Phone (907) 486-3535 Post Office Box 497 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Kodiak Council on Alcoholism is a social service agency that deals with people who have both health and financial problems. Kodiak Council on Alcoholism supports low income housing in Kodiak. We view this comm- odity as a necessary transition for clients who are recovering. It gives them an opportunity to take responsibility for themselves and insure a level of protection that they can afford. SS:ghm Sincerely, Susan Stubbe Executive Director A PRIVATE NON-PROFIT CORPORATION KOD1AK COMMUNITY CGL,LEGE CAROLYN FLOYD Telephone (907) 486-4161 CAMPUS PRESIDENT Box 946, Kodiak, Alaska, 99615 5 1983 Tom Ozumbrado, Dept. Director Kodiak Island Housing Authority Box 197 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Dear Tom, July 31, 1980 We at Kodiak Community College are in full support of providing low cost housing in Kodiak. Such housing would be an important factor in making it possible for married students to attend college here. Currently, the high cost of living expenses makes it very difficult for people with families to pursue full-time college programs. Low cost housing would also make it possible for families from the villages to come into Kodiak to attend school. At present costs, this is not a practical plan. In fact, we have had some students who have enrolled and then have had to move back to the village because of the high cost of living in Kodiak. Sincerely, OCAeLe._ Carol Hagel, Director of Academic Affairs • 1: (e) "Shelter Rent" means the total of all charges to all r tenants of the Project for dwelling rents and non-dwelling rents : (excluding all other income of the Project), less the cost of the Local Authority of all-dwelling and non-dwelling utilities; (f) "HUD" means the United States Department of Housing. N and Urban Development. KODIAK ISLAND AU:H:2;R:TY The Kodiak Island Borough and KANA Housing Authority enter into the following Agreement this 15th day of Nay , 1980. In consideration of the mutual covenants herein the parties agree as follows: 1. Whenever used in this agreement: '(a) "Local Authority" means the KANA Housing Authority; (b) "Municipality" means the Kodiak Island Borough; (c) "Project" means the low rent housing project of 54 (or more if land is available) units to be developed within the Municipality by the Local Authority with financial assistance of HUD. This term excludes any low rent housing project covered by any contract for loans and annual contributions entered into between the Local Authority and the HUD, or its predecessor agencies,- prior to the date of this Agreement; (d) "Taxing Body" means the State or any political sub- division or taxing unit thereof in which the Project is situated and which would have authority to assess or levy real or personal property taxes or to certify such taxes to a taxing body or public officer to be levied for its use and benefit with respect to the Project if the Project were not exempt from taxation: I I • !• 2. The Local Authority shall endeavor to secure a contract or contracts with the HUD for loans and annual contributions to support the Project. The Local Authority shall plan, develop and administer the Project. The Municipality shall have no contract-: ual responsiblity with respect to the Project other than as expressly provided in this Agreement. 3. (a) Under the laws of the State of Alaska, the Project is exempt from all real and personal property taxes and special assessments levied or imposed by any Taxing Body. So long as either (i) the Project is owned by a public body or governmental agency and is used for low rent housing purposes, or (ii) any contract between the Local Authority and the HUD for loans or annual contributions or both, in connection with such Project or any monies due to the HUD in connection with such Project remain unpaid, whichever period is the longest, the Municipality agrees that it will not levy or impose any real or personal property taxes or special assessments upon such Project or upon the Local Authority with respect thereto. During such period, the Local Authority shall make annual payments (herein called "Payments in Lieu of Taxes") in lieu of such taxes and special assessments and in payment for the public services and facilities furnished from time to time without other cost or charge for or with respect to such Project. • Cooperation Agreement Page 1 • • . • •• • • _ •• • ... -- • . • ' • • • •-- after the en.. .._ t.-.: ____a_ year esta,._ished the Project, a:... shall be an ^ amou.._ equal to either (1) ten percent (10 ) of the Shelter Rent actually collected, but in no event to exceed ten t percent (1:.5) of the Shelter Pent char red by the Local Authority with respect to the Project during such fiscal year, or (,_) the amount permitted to be paid by applicable state law in effect on the date such payment is made, whichever amount is the lower. (c) The Municipality shall distribute the Payments in. Lieu of Taxes among the Taxing Bodies.in the proportion which the real property taxes which would have been paid to each Taxing Body for such year if the Project were not exempt from taxation bears to the total real property taxes which would have been paid to all of the taxing bodies for such year if the Project were not exempt • from taxation; Provided, however: That no payment for any year shall be made to any Taxing Body in excess of the amount of the ' real property taxes which would have been paid to such Taxing Body for such year if the Project were not exempt from taxation. (d) Upon failure of the Local Authority to make any Payment in Lieu of Taxes, no lien against the Project or assets of the Local Authority shall attach, nor shall any rterest or penalties accrue or attach on account thereof. 4. During the period commencing with the date of the acqui- sition of the finished project and continuing so. long as either . (i) such Project is owned by a public body or governmental agency and is used for low rent housing purposes, or (ii) any contract ' between the Local Authority and the HUD for loans or annual con - tributions, or both, in connection with such Project remains in force and effect, (iii) any bonds issued in connection with such • Project remain unpaid, whichever period is the longest, the • Municipality, without cost or charge to the Local Authority or • tenants of such Project (other than the Payments in Lieu of Taxes), shall: ij (a) Furnish or cause to be furnished to the Local Authority and the tenants of such Project public services and • facilities of the same character and to the same extent as are furnished from time to time without cost or charge to other dwellings and inhabitants in the same service area; II (b) Notwithstanding the date of acquisition, the Municipality shall vacate such streets, roads, and alleys within the area of such Project as may be necessary to the development ;; thereof, and convey without charge to the Local Authority such interest as the Municipality may have in such vacated areas; and,i • insofar as the Municipality is lawfully able to do so without cost • or expense to the Local Authority or-to the Municipality as the power of the Municipality to do so may appear by statute, ordin ante or otherwise, cause to be removed from vacated areas, insofar as it may be necessary, all public or private utility lines and ' equipment; (c) Notwithstanding the date of acquisition the Municipality may (i) grant such deviations from the building code as are reasonable and necessary to promote economy and efficiency in the development and administration of such Project, and at the same'time, safeguard health and safety; and (ii) make such changes in any zoning cf the site and surrounding territory of such Project as are reasonable and necessary for the development and protection of such Project and the surrounding territory; (d) The Municipality shall accept grants and easements necessary for the development of such Project, and . Cocperatior. Agreement Page 2 (.e! C:ozerate with the Local Auth:rity by such other lawful action :r ways az the :!lunicipality and the Local Authcrity may agree to be necessary in connection with the development and administration of the r-roject. at within a reasonable time after of a written 5. In respect to the Project, the Nunicipality further agrees th . - ., . --;1- request therefore from the Local Authority it will accept the dedication of all interior streets, ,roads, alleys, and adjacent sidewalks within the area of such Project, together with all storrm and sanitary sewer mains in such dedicated areas, after the Local Authority's Developer has completed the grading, improvements, paying and installation thereof, in accordance with specifications acceptable to the Municipality. 6. If by reason of the Municipality's failure or refusal to furnish or cause to be furnished any public services or facilities . . ' - '. - ....,-,-... • which it has agreed hereunder to furnish or cause to be furnished to the Local Authority or to the tenants of the Project, the Local n .- Authority's Developer incurs an expense to obtain such services or . ;.,,!-_ facilities, then the Local Authority may deduct the amount of such :., , • expenses from any payment in Lieu of Taxes due or to become due to ' the Municipality in respect to the Project. . , 7. No Cooperation Agreement heretofore entered into between :::,.:: . the Municipality and the Local Authority shall be construed to • :----:.:-,..:i..:__: . .. • tributions, or both, in connection with the Project remains in -..7.7:7.,.;.!:::.. ▪ 8. So long as any contract between the Local Authority and - apply to the Project covered by this Agreement. • the HUD for loans (including preliminary loans) or annual con- force and effect, or so long as any bonds issued.in connection with the Project, or any monies due to the HUD in connection with . the Project remain unpaid, this Agreement shall not be abrogated,-- --.'' ,- .:: - 1 7: • .'"r7" ' '' ..--"""'"' _ • changed, or modified without the consent of the HUD. The privileges and obligations of the Municipality hereunder shall : • remain in full force and effect with respect to the Project so • long as the beneficial title to such Project is held by the Local Authority or by any other public body for development or admin- • istration of low rent housing projects. If, at any time, the '. beneficial title to, or possession of, the Project is held by such other public body or governmental agency, including the HUD, the • provisions hereto shall inure to the benefit of and may be ...- enforced by such other public body or governmental agency including the HUD. . :: - • :-.-!-,.:•-:!:.:-::,..-7.-7."--------,..--- " - - : :,- ,--: :::........-;,...::„1:t-.!-.--- - - - • - . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Municipality and the Local Authority have respectively signed this Agreement of the day and year first. • above written. .-_..- ■ - - ,!,- . • . .• • •-• . , I.1 • • Cooperation Agreement Page 3 KODI, ISL, • ;OROUGH By A Avez4.‘ KANA HOUSING AUTHORITY By Executive Director .7Z -- - • . .. ." - .'..",-;.:',..-:•-...:.:. -. . . • . . . . . .....---....,...."..:- ri --7..f.-.,-^, ..•• ::,-.....: .,_ ' .. . .1 • • • _ ip% _ --'------ ‘'°% /r � --- LAW OFFICES OF _ RICHARD W. GARNETT III THOMAS F. KLINKNER SUITE 540, 900 WEST FIFTH AVENUE ANCHORAGE. ALASKA 99501 -•- - TEL. (907) 276-2221 October 9, 1979 Mr. Harry Milligan Director of Planning Kodiak Island borough Box 1246 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Re: KANA Housing Authority-low income housing proposal. Dear Harry: The KANA Housing Authority has proposed to construct a .HUD- funded low income housing project in the orough. In connection with this. proposal the Housing Authority has requested that the Borough convey to it, a tract of Borough-owned property fdr the project site, and that the Borough enter into a cooperation agreement with HUD and the Housing Authority. You have asked three questions regarding the Housing Authority's requests: 1. May the Borough convey land to the KANA Housing Authority for leSs than its fair market value? 2. May the Borough convey land to the KANA Housing Authority subject to a reversionary interest if the project ceases to be used for low-income • housing purposes, without causing a conflict with HUD standards for the project? • 3. What obligations does the cooperation agreement impose upon the Borough? I conclude that the Borough may convey land to the Housing Authority for.less than fair market value and that the Borough may retain a properly worded reversionary interest in the property without conflicting with HUD requirements. The obligations imposed upon the Borough by the cooperation agreement are described below. The circumstances under which the Borough may conveyland for less-than fair market value are specified in AS 29.48.260 (b) and KIB code 18.20.020. There is no material variation between these two provisions, so it is sUfficient to quote KIB code 18.-20.020: 0 /0 0 Law Offices of iliCIIARD W., GARNETT Ill „,- Real property or.interest therein may be sold, leased, or donated to the Unfted States, the State of Alaska, or any political subdivision thereof for less than its appraised value. Said real property may be disposed of whenever, in the judgment of the Assembly, it is in the best interest of the Borough and upon the'terms prescribed by Borough resolution. If the KANA Housing Authority is part of the "State of Alaska or any,political subdivision thereof," the Borough may transfer property to it for less than fair market value. It is my understanding that the KANA Housing Authority is a Regional Native Housing Authority established under AS 18.55.995, et. seq. Such a housing authority is a "public . body corporate and politic," having, with limited exceptions, '- all the powers, rights and functions specified for the Alaska State Housing Authority under the Alaska State Housing Authority Act, AS 18.55.996(b). While the Alaska State Housing Authority is a.corporate entity, with a, legal existence distinct from. the state, Bridges v Alaska State Housing Authority, 349 Pad 149 (Alaska 1959), it is an instrumentality of the State within the state governmentstructure, Alaska State Housing Authority v Dixon, 496 P2d 649 (Alaska 1972), and, . because it acts for the benefit of the public generally and performs governmental functions, it should be regarded as .part of the state for the purpose of AS 29.48.260(b) and KIB Code 18.20.020. see University of Alaska v National Aircraft Leasing, Ltd., 536 P2d 121 (Alaska 1975). The KANA Housing Authority, which operates under the same authority as ASHA, also should be eligible for a less than market value conveyance under that statute and drdinance. , The contract form under which HUD will finance the project requires that the Housing Authority: ...acquire good and valid title to the site of the project free and clear of any mortgage, lease, lien, or encumbrance of any,nature whatsoever, other than such leases, use restrictions, zoning ordinances, building restrictions, easements, or rights of way as will not, in the determination of the (Housing Authority) approved by (HUD), adversely affect the value or .usefulnes of such site for the, project. Under this provision, the local counsel for HUD has indicated that HUD will accept a conveyance to the Housing Authority subject to a reversionary interest in the Borough.to secure the use of the property for low income housing, provided that the reversionary interest is subordinate to the housing . authority's agreement with HUD and HUD's security interest in the project. The HUD attorney proposed language acceptable to HUD creating a reversionary interest in the Borough which, with slight modification, should meet the Borough's needs.. Law Offices of GAT:NEVI' III j The Borough's execution of the cooperation agreement proposed by KANA is a prerequisite to the Housing Authority's obtaining HUD funding for the project. The agreement imposes obligations on the Borough in the following areas. Taxation - the agreement requires that the project be exempted from Borough real and personal property taxes, and that rents paid for housing in the project be exempt from sales tax. The Housing Authority is required annually to pay the Borough a sum in lieu of real and personal property taxes. However, the project would be exempt from real and personal property taxation even in the absence of the agreement. AS 18.55.996(b), AS 18.55.250. Elimination of unsafe dwellings - the agreement obligates the Borough to eliminate a number of unsafe or unsanitary dwellings in the Borough equal to the number of dwelling units in the project. Furnishing services - the agreement requires the Borough to furnish eo the project services of the same character and extent as are furnished to ather dwellings or inhabitants in the Borough. This provision should be clarified to take into account the Borough's service area system of service delivery. (:)Rights of way - the Borough is required to vacate easements and rights of way, and accept dedications of the same, as necessary for the development of the project. Public improvements, special assessments - the Borough is required to provide streets, water mains,' and storm and sanitary sewers for the project, charging the project the same amount that a private property owner would be assessed for such improvements. The project is exempt from special assessments, but would be anyway unser state law, see AS 18.55.996(b), AS 18.55.250. If you have any additional questions regarding this matter, please let me know-. Yours truly, 46KAu5 Thomas F. Klinkn TFK/lr TT Minutes, •August 16, 1979 ' Page 3 Mrs. Crowe moved to recommend to the Borough Assembly that we lease to Brech- an for a period of 10 years, Parcel P-1, Tract A, Bells Flats Alaska Subd- ivision. Seconded by Mr. Erwin. Motion PASSED by unanimous roll call vote. 0-79-037. Purchase of Tracts B and E, Kadiak Subdivision. (KANA Housing Authority) STAFF REPORT: Mr. Milligan presented the staff report based on a memorandum prepared by the planning department. Mrs. Crowe questioned the vacation of Woody Circle. Would some of the adjoining land be left without an access? • Mr. Milligan answered, yes there would be one piece of lend without access. Mr. Simmons stated we are not going to vacate Woody Circle. We are going to build approximately 60 units which would require rezoning to R-3. Mr. Pugh moved to recommend to sell these lots at a public auction as is, Tracts B and E, Kadiak Subdivision. Seconded by Mr. Ball. Motion FAILED, with a 3-2 vote, Mr. Busch and Mr. Erwin' voted NO, and Mr. Ball, Mrs. Crowe and Mr. Pugh voted YES. Mrs. Crowe moved to reaffirm to the Borough Assembly that the land be re- subdivided and sold at a public auction. Seconded by Mr. Erwin. Mr. Pugh would like to propose an'amendment that states that if the Borough Assembly finds that it is financially-impossible and/or the vacant lot subdivded and provide the proper facilities to these tracts within a two month period then Tracts B and E of Kadiak Subdivision be sold immediately at a public auction. Seconded by Mr. Bali. Motion PASSED with a 4-1 vote Mr. Erwin voted NO, and all other commissioner's voted YES. Mrs. Crowe moved to reaffirm to the Borough Assembly that the lad be re- subdivided and sold at a public auction. Seconded by Mr. Erwin. Motion PASSED with a 4-1 vote. Mr. Erwin voted NO and all other Commissioner's voted YES. V. OLD BUSINESS 1. BL-78-091. Gravel Borrow Site Lease on Bells Flats Alaska Subdivision, Trac B-2. (Russell Welborn) STAFF REPORT: Mr. Milligan presented the staff report based on a memorandum prepared by the planning department. Mr. Busch closed the regular meeting and opened the public hearing. Mr. Welborn discussed the reasons why he was-late in submitting the lease renewal. He is willing to resubmit an application for a new lease. Mr. Brechan asked what Ordinance the original lease was issued under? Was it issued under the 1969 Ordinance? Mr. Busch closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting. Mr. Erwin moved that the lease be renewed for one year. Seconded by Mr. Pugh Motion FAILED, with a 3-1 vote, Mrs. Crowe obstaining, Mr. Busch voted NO and Mr. Ball, Mr. Erwin and Mr. Pugh voted YES. Mr. Erwin moved that Mr. Welborn be allowed to reapply for his lease on one year terms. Seconded by Mr. Pugh. Motion PASSED with a 4-1 vote. Mrs. Crowe obstaining and all other commissioners voted YES. Discussion on above motion it was determined that Mr. Erwin did not have to make a motion giving Mr. Welborn permission to reapply for the lease. Mr. Busch moved to reconsider actionon Borough Site .lease, Bells Flats Alaska Subdivision, Tract B-2. Seconded by Mr. Ball. Motion PASSED by a 4-1 vote. Mrs. Crowe obstaning and all other commissioner's voted YES. 4 KODIAK ISLAND ROUGH' • Telephones 486-5736 - 486-5737 — Box 1246 KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 MEMORANDUM' DATE: July 31,.1979 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Planning Staff SUBJ: Case History, Case File #0-79-037 RE: Request to purchase Tracts "B" and "E", Kadiak.Alaska Subdivision. (KANA Housing Authority) REQUEST: The Kodiak area Native Association Housing Authority is requesting authorization to purchase—Tracts "B" and "E" of the Kadidk Alaska Subdivision. Rise Tracts are presently owned by the Kodiak Island Borough. • SITE: The petitioned property id located between the Kodiak Community College property and the New Luthern Church Site. The site is presently undeveloped and has a large stand or virgin timber. Access to-the site is via Woody Way an un- developed street. r• The site is immediately adjacent to the City of Kodiak and Public utlities could be extended from the adjacent Killarney Hills Subdivision. HISTORY: Several years.ago this property was zoned for industrial use,then on January 12, 1979 the Borough Assembly adopted the Kodiak Island Borough Ordinance 78-30-0 rezoning the property from Industrial to R-2, two-family Residential. Also on January 12, 1979 the Borough Assembly directed the Planning Department conduct a cost study to determine the cost of re-subdividing the prOperty and installing roads, sewer utilities to the site. This cost analysis has not been prepared do to insuficient funds required to cover costs. ANALYSIS: Tract "B" contains 79,440 square feet and Tract "E" contains 93,690 square feet. Each Tract can be developed with one and two family dwellings unless 1) rezoned to R-3, 2) resubdivided or 3) developed under the,group housing provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. Group housing would permit 22 units on Tract "B" (79,440 i 7200 11 x 2 . 22) and 26 units on Tract "E" (93,690 i 7200 = 13 x 2 = 26). If you were to vacate Wood Circle the area contains approximately 24,654 square feet this would permit Memorandum, page 2 July 31,4979 an additional 6.8 units (24,654 7200 = 3.4. x 2 = 6.8). Thus on a gross density basis Tract "B" can support (79,440 sq. ft.) 22 units Tract "E" can support (93,690 sq. ft.) 26 units Total Tracts "B" & "E" 48 units ' The right-of-way area if vacated (24,654. sq. ft.) 6.8 Total optimun R-2 density under group housing 54.3 units Under the R-3 provisions the density could be substantually altered depending . on subdivision configurations and building sizes. However, to take this approach would require amending the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and rezoning the property. The KANA purchase application does not indicate proposed densities, building sizes and related information. Mr. Tubbs the Borough Land Management Consultant has reviewed this application. He indicates two other applicants have applied for lease or purchase of Tract "A". Title 18 of the Kodiak Island Borough Code- of Ordinances. requires that if the propert,} is to be sold or leased it must be effected at a public auction. ,..Mr.. Tubbs indicates a negotiated sale could be effected with KANA providing a'restricted deed is deliverec with reversion provisions. The Planning and Zoning Commission is required to review all Kodiak Island Borough property leases or purchase applications and to make a recommendation to •the AsseNbly on each application. 2 0. 0 2. C--- co ;icy-70M errcir lg. 2-0, D40 5 pcePAM5/9 ag 4500 %' ry g � - ,/ffirri..2/ 4eg -,z. 'Gs1 -ES di X 3 Ccb sc)Ft ' 14i, omi . #716.1 /f toe /a%/. ,,C 2k- A 9•y ti4 .? .: 2 Yi'.r .5 - . go 54 clf" 2F t.rvr rr}..eus tJVr r U1 t..rV 1 rvtar t trvr rur ul Ira s Iururl.;U \-.01111. 1.r ,(.: V GIV f.al r riJr rt GREEN SPACE SYSTEM PROVIDES PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO ALL UNITS MATURE HARDWOOli HAMMOCK — RETAIN AS OPEN SPACE r` CURVED ROAD FOR CHANGING VISTA A – — COMMUNITY CENTER NO FRONTAGE ON MAIN ROAD OUT — PARCEL BUFFER AT PROPERTY LINES -1r PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (SAME NUMBER OF UNITS AS ON CONVENTIONAL PLAN The planned unit development ordinance usually incor- porates standards for dwelling unit density, open space, d other spatial requirements. PUD ordinances • usually place emphasis on total community design, with review of plans by local agencies and public hearing bodies as a primary requirement. NO FRONTAGE ON ^MAIN ROAD MATURE HARDWOOD HAMMOCK DEDICATE AS PUBLIC PARK CONVENTIONAL SINGLE FAMILY Gary Greenen, ASLA, ALP; Miami, Florida Rafael. Graz, Grapnici, Coordinator; Miami, Florida LAND PLANNING AND SITE DEVELOPMENT ADVANTAGES OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND CLUSTER ZONING CONCEPTS Although the lot -by -lot type of subdivision is still the prevalent development type in many suburban areas, the amenities that can be realized by the planned unit development and cluster zoning concepts are such that these approaches should be seriously considered. In some communities the terms planned unit develop- ment (PUD) and cluster may be synonymous. Usually, however, the PUD is a more comprehensive approach than the cluster, with provisions for both single family and multifamily development and, in some instances, commercial and industrial activities. The term cluster refers to the grouping of single family residences in clusters on lots smaller than permitted by the single .family zoning district, and compensating for the smaller lots with common open space areas of substan- tial and usable configurations. Both methods offer the designer not only the flexibil- ity of locating structures in a manner that responds to site features, but also the opportunity for developing imaginative architectural forms. A key element of these approaches is the common green space that gives design cohesiveness to the total project. , The responsibility for the maintenance of common _space and associated common facilities is a major con- cern that must be resolved in PUD and cluster develop- ments. The homeowners association is the most com- monly accepted approach. The association should be established by recorded agreement before the sale of the first unit by "the developer. Each homeowner is automatically a member and is assessed a proportion- ate share of the cost in maintaining the common facil- ities. The developer or his attorney should evaluate the best methods of developing a homeowners' association before the initiation of site development. Many juris- dictions require a legal instrument fog., the association prior to final approval of the project. The use of common open space usually allows more flexibility in effectively fitting the development to the land than does the more typical lot -by -lot approach. Following are some of the obvious advantages gained by the proper use of the planned unit development Concept: 1. With smaller individual lots, excess and can be massed together to provide larger and more useful community recreational space. 2. With the use of connecting community open spaces and fewer through traffic streets, children are better protected from vehicular traffic. 3. With Larger amounts of open space, the natural character of the site can be preserved. 4. With the shorter networks of streets and utilities, construction costs can be reduced. It should be emphasized that the standard subdivision approach still retains a major part of the housing mar - ket :Where the program suggests a more typical sub- division layout, the site planner has a responsibility to respond to the same environmental design determinants of the site as for a project being developed under more flexible zoning criteria. Creative planning can be ac- complished using either approach. CONVENTIONAL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONED. DEVELOPM ENT The density determination for conventional single fam- ily residential zoning is based on minimum lot size requirements as provided by local ordinances. For planning purposes, the site planner can translate lot size to a net density figure which represents the total number of dwellings per acre within the site, after de- ducting for roads, parks, school sites, and other public facilities. KODIAK ISLAND BOROI.7--I Box 1246 Kodiak, Alaska 99613 FIRST CLASS MAIL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission has received a petition from KODIAK ISLAND HOUSING AUTHORITY requesting an exception from section 17.30.040, 17.30.060(8) and 17.30.060(18) to permit Kodiak Island Housing Authority to build 48 units on Tracts B & E, Kadiak Alaska Subdivision. The Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a Public Hearing on this matter at 7:30 p.m., Wednesday, May 20, 1981 in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 700 Upper Mill Bay Road, Kodiak. You are being notified because you are either the property owner of the above-referenced lots, or an owner of property within 300 feet of the above-referenced property. This will be the only Public Hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission on this petition, and you are invited to appear and voice your opinion. If you cannot attend, you may submit a written opinion that can be read into the minutes of the Public Hearing. If you would like to comment on the petition proposal, this form may be used for your convenience, and returned to the Planning Department. Further information is available from the Planning Department, telephone 486-5736. KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH Department of Planning and Community Development Name Address Legal Description Comments TRACT TRACT R -1 U BDIVIS!O 6 UBDI■ r1 • • — --r° • : .......1 '` •' .. • ,.,• •a 6•. • r • .(!;.4,2‘. { �. • 9._ I 1; • :« • . ,... • .... • . .. . • • , , , . . .... - ..., , . . . . ...: . .. . , . . .. . . . . . . . . . . • . - _ . . ... ... . . • '... . ' .. .. - . , . . . . — . . . . . . . . . „ , . . . .. ..... ..._ . _ . . . • . . - , . . - ' ' • ' • . '• - • ,., • . . . . : . , ,,,, ., . , .. . . . . . ,...... ........ , . . • .., . ,_.. .. , , . : - .- , .... . . , • .... ''''' - ' : ' ''' ..., ''', ,';',.. ..f... :7". ';',. : ' '"'. - ' :-..l.'...-^:-:.*:';',:•.;;';-:'- 7.!..'" .... "'-• 4.:".1.17,11.;:.1::;:':1.--,:, ' - . ' ' • -...; - L. ' ' . . .., . ... :.' . ; ....'..,Y:.:-..,..... ' .. • :.....,;,,T..,2,;.,:...-!;.,"';.'f,..... s.;:....., .....-....,,,,..2.......:4..,..,c;;;K:.:-.:Z.;;:;,,4:....".".--- "--,-7-7,-,,,r..---7-,.--.."-- • -;,,,:., .1tr-Z,Z1' • -,- ( Rii80010040 ( BERGER,JOHN & MARGARET J 1414 M STREET ANCHORAGE AK 99501 (. Rii8001.0050i ( KUTCHIK,RONALD & ROSA P.O. BOX 2295 KODIAK AK 99615 ) '""' • ;37 -;";;;;-,•.-!.•.7-7; , • • ' 1. • . • _ • • P.CL OX KODIAK 6 B CROWDER DELERT & DELOR . R1180010060 HEDMAN,DAVID & EVELYN 20215 N.E.68TH ST. VANCOUVER WA 98662 ; R1180010071 (. MINKS,DAVID & CAROL P.O. BOX 3006 KODIAK AK 99615 R1180010081 HOEDEL, DOUGLAS & RHODA P.O. BOX 2932 KODIAK AK 99619 R1180010090 i- AK' '5845 _ B30 , • I( 81180030010: (- YATSIK, JAMES & LAQUITA P.O. BOX 13 KODIAK . AK 99615 j ( ( 81180030020 ZIMMER,ARTHUR & ARLENE , P.O. BOX 1582 KODIAK MEUNIER,HENRY P.O. BOX 2732 KODIAK AK 99615 ( R1180030030j ( & SARAH AK 99615 ( (. R1180030040I RICHARDSON,FRANCIS H. &CAR P.O. BOX 2637 KODIAK AK 99615 R1180030050 ( WEHE,EUGENE & CAROL J. P.G. BOX 1933 VALDEZ AK 99686 81180030060 WISCHER, THOMAS &KATHLEEN P.O. BOX 202 KODIAK AK 99615 81180040010 BEARDSLEY,ALAN & SHARRON P.O. BOX 29. - KODIAK AK 996i5 (' R7335000150 ERDMAN,DONALD & SOPHY P.O. BOX 394 - - KODIAK AK 99615 R7355000010 MULLEN,VICTOR & LOIS B. P.O. BOX 2713 KODIAK AK 99615 R7355000020 HAUSMAN,ALBERT & LOIS P.O. BOX 107 KODIAK AK 99615 87355000021: DOYLE,JOHN & LORRAINE P.O. BOX 1233 KODIAK AK 99615 MURPHY,WAYNE P.O. BOX 2171 KODIAK CHURCH OF CHRIST P.O. BOX 203 - KODIAK R7355000030 . ( AK 99615 R7355000040 ( AK 99615 87355000050 BALL,ROLLYN & VIRGINIA P.G. BOX 2485 KODIAK AK 99615 -- R7515040010 PEREZ,ANTHONY & MADELYN P.O. BOX 6. . . �KODIAK _ - ._ AK 99615 ( • • c ( C PRAVO,AMALIA P.O. BOX 1643 KODIAK R7335000091 AK 99615 R7335000101 PADEN,DALLAS & MARION P.O. BOX 2674 KODIAK AK 99615 R7335000092 HALL,DANIEL GENERAL DELIVERY KODIAK AK 99615 8 & H FISHERIES HOLLAND,CAROL P.O. BOX 533 KODIAK KODIAK,CITY OF P.O. E +OX 1397 KODIAK BENT, DOROTHY F' . 0 . BOX 52 OUZINKIE R7335000102 AK 99615 87335000110 AK 99615 CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE % BEAN, JULIAN, JR. BOX 2813 KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 ARNDT, KEVIN P.O. BOX 2338 KODIAK it R7510000010; ( AK 99615 1 (' j 1 R7515020030•I( ( C R7515010020' ( AK , 99644 87515010030 ALWERT,WM & JEAN P.O. BOX 1711 KODIAK AK 99615 R7355000070 FRIEND,LLOYD D,RUTH:,WENDY P.O. BOX 1491 _ KODIAK AK 99615 I GROTHE,LENHART J. P.O. .BOX 1504 KOI)IAK AK 99615 AMERICAN LUTHERAN CHURCH 422 SOUTH 5TH STREET - MINNEAPOLIS MI 55415 ST PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCH000040 ( P.O. BOX 102 KODIAKA AK 99615 KODIAK COMMUNITY COLLEGE BOX 946 KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 KODIAK ISLAND HOUSING AUTHORITY BOX 197 KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 f 1 2-ko-evo- A455 3L/4pc? 2/i 7 o o'/ f/ C'ePO 0420 ,/r 7 0 ePacwo c.-7" P'- rkc 4257 .0P0c,./0 457.0067e7 C 75-/ e)9ve7 3e7 oac a/5 ,S6(121;aeyci-? / cs--/ °ve) O if 757 (20t; 5-C) 7 6-7- o oe? •7 o u5s 3o” 42/7.33 5.--E52eve9 c' //?5c0o 4? 7 -F3c,/O/ e 73 .5- 5— CI C, 0/0 Z- IP 7 35(-5-00C, // e 3 :3,5"-e- z:nz, / a e7.q3,5o00/3c, e?336-000 /4/0 10 e 1__55"5-1-.5)000 / 7555- 000 ,e 3 7-5-50Dooe_i e 7 3z-3-0c-17 30_, 9. e 7 335-So , /f77353--o co 5Z) . 2 3 .5:5-o e..) 6 c, ,e 7 .53oc co 0 ^!!!!!Alwya...v.14.u. • a 442 • • .2, 4 • • • • • •, • , . t 5-4 ci- 104- \ ige _7575-0 /e)0/0 ,/ /Q7 5-0/00 -3c) 10 4- .1.: . 77 /5-e)24,0/ Q /19 7 57 5-04Q, to _ . /6? 757s-0 zeo..3e) b1o(Y- 1 . ,\27 57 53 vex)/ /4,2 7 5775-0yao z-so (1 ‘I 10.\r vy s • , '/75` or/ or e/O • loV / Oat() /1160/00,a?" 1/1-er. Ool 007 k/ 1-F 007 00 ?-1 /e8r0O/Oo ocx,0 /0 00 2.-04 247 "\O\ bc.-k_ 3 doe/7, ovz co/0 Awe &a-sec z_c? 3e,e, 30 (/F-&O Sieve, 70 /e77? Oo 34,0 5-,Z) G44-10U:cd s-t,a,1/4c-A„ Goi% aer 3 - - „ I •, • .. • . . _ • _ • . . ', • ;Solt 9-33g • 7:7"73,1- / I • ••',"• ,•••N• 4?,14.• c,-‘4 1-)?tAxvitiy,t TITLE. 19 ; ,_• SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS Chapters: 19.10 Special Assessment Districts- - Purposes for which Authorized 19.20 Special Assessment Districts-- Creation and Dissolution 19.30 Calculation of Improvement Costs 19.40 - Allocation of Street Improvement Costs 19.50 Allocation of Off - Street Parking Costs 19.55 Allocation of Cost of Water Improvements 19.60 Conversion of Electric and Telephone Facilities 19.65 Allocation of Other Non -Sewer Improvement Costs 19.70 Allocation of Cost of Sewer Improvements 19.80 Permission to Enter Sewer Improvement Districts Municipality of Anchorage e,. 3500 East Tudor Road Anchorage, Alaska 99507 p1�' 1t)r Telephone (907) 263 -8208 or 263 -8108 Department of r Public Works Management MARK A Program SOLLENBERGER Street /Road Assessment Technician (Supp. 12/31/77) Chapter 19,10 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS--PURPOSES FOR WHJCH AUTHORIZED Sections: 1g'10'U1U 19.10.020 Assessment districts under Charter. Spacial assessment districts—Authorized improvements. 19-10'010 Assessment districts under Charter. The Assembly by ordinance may establish assessment districts to provide and finance capital improvements by means of an assessment, or services by means of a tax levy.. The assessment or levy shall be proportionate to the benefit received from and the burden imposed upon the improvement or service. The Assembly by ordinance shall prescribe uniform criteria for allocating the cost of the improvement or service within an assessment district. (Charter, §9.02/al1, 19.10'020 Special assessment districts—Authorized improvements. A special assessment district for a' public improvement including, without limitation, for any one or more of the following improvements may be initiated: A. Streets, roads, parkways, street lighting, curbs and gutters, driveways, curb cuts and sidewalks; BB Storm sewers or drains; . ' C. Sanitary sewers; D. Parks, recreation areas and open space; E. Off-street parking facilities; F. Changes in channels of streams or watercourses; G. Bridges, culverts, bulkheads, embankments and dikes for streams-or watercourses; 19-2 et- H. Water supply system including water mains, water connections and flre hydrants; Fallout or disaster shelters; J. Street, road, parkway and sidewalk drainage, oiling, sprinkling and snow removal; K. Conversion of the existing municipally owned electric and telephone overhead transmission and distribution facilities to underground facilities. (Adapted from CAC 3'08'190 and GAAB 11.05.010l. 19-3 Chapter 19.20 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS-- CREATION AND DISSOLUTION Sections: • 19.20'010 Initiation. 19'20'020 Initiation by petition--Form and requirements. 19.20.030 Initiation by petition--Action by mayor. 19'20'040 Initiation by petition—Public hearing. 19'20'050 Initiation by petition--Assembly ection. 13,20.060 Initiation by petition--Assessment roll. 19.20,070 Initiation by petition--Public hearing-- Objections. 19.20.080 • Initiation by petition--Confirmation of assessment roll. 19.20'080 Initiation by petition--Public hearing-- Notice. 19'20'100 Initiation by Assembly—Authorized. 18,20'110 Initiation by Assembly--Action by mayor. 19'20.120 Initiation by Assembly--Public hearing. 19'20,130 Initiation by Assembly--Assembly actiori. 19'20'140 Initiation by Assembly--Assessment roll. 79.20'150 Initiation by Assembly--Public hearing-- Objections. 19.20,160 Initiation by Assembly—Confirmatiqn of assessment roll. 19,20.170 Initiation by Assembly--Public hearing-- Notice. 19'20'188 Assembly ordinance--Filed of record. 18'20.190 Property assessed. 19'20'200 Property subject to Horizontal Property Regimes Act. 19.20.210 Planned unit developments. 19'20.220 Property owner determination. 19'20.230 Amount assessed. 13'20'240 Time payment periods. - 19.20.250 Assessment notices. 19'20.260 Assessment payment—Delinquency—Interest . and penalty. 19.20.270 Lien--Procedure for collection. 19.20'280 Early payoff. 18'20.290 Limitations on suits and actions. 19'20.300 Waiver of objections. 19.20.310 Cumulative enforcement. 19 �O 32O Appeal. , . p�ea . \ / � 19-4 r 19.20.330 19.20.340 19.20.350 Application of state law. Correction of invalid special aaseSs- menta. Dissolution of assessment district. 19.20.010 Initiation. The Assembly may assess against the real property benefited all or any part of the cost of acquiring property interests for and the design, construction/ repair, reconstruction or other improvement of all or any part of a public improvement. When more than one property is to be specially benefited, the project is considered a special assessment district. A special assessment district may be created or extended only with the approval of the property owners who would bear more than 50% of the estimated assessed cost of the improvement or service. A special assessment district may be initiated by: A. Petition to the Assembly by the owners of property within the district; or B. The Assembly. An account or accounts for each special assessment district shall be created and kept separate from all other municipal accounts. Assessments collected within a special assessment district may be applied only to costs incurred with respect to that assessment district. (Adapted from (]AAB 11.10.010/ CAC 3.08.010 and Charter, 83.02(b) and (e)). 19.20.020 Initiation by petition--Form and requirements. The petition shall be in a form prescribed by the mayor and shall include a description of the improvement sought by the petition. The original or copies of the petition shall be signed by the owners of properties which will bear more than 50% of the estimated assessed cost of the improvement sought by the petition, except the percentage required for fallout or disaster shelters, or as set out in Chapter- 19.65 for certain improvement districts involving parks, recreation areas and open space, changes in channels of streams or watercourses, or bridges, culverts, bulkheads, embankments or dikes for streams or watercourses wherein the municipality has determined not to participate in the cost of such improvements, r' then the petition shall bear the signatures of owners of properties which shall bear at least 75% of the estimated assessed cost of improvements sought by the petition. The petition when signed shall be filed with the rnunicipa! clerk. No property owner may withdraw his signature of approval three months after the petition has been filed with the clerk, unless authorized by the Assembly. (Adapted from CAC 3'08'020 and GAAB 11'10'020A). 19.20.030 Initiation by petition--Action by mayor. Upon receipt by the mayor of the petition from the clerk, the mayor shall make a report to the Assembly concerning the district. The report shall contain a description of the improvement proposed and its estimated cost, the location. of the improvement, a verification that property owners representing more than 50% of the estimated cost have petitioned for the improvement, a general description of the extent of the proposed assessment district, and a recommendation as to whether or not to proceed with the improvement. The report of the mayor may be made either before or at the time of public hearing on the necessity for the proposed improvement. (Adapted from CAC 3.08'030 and GAAB 11.10.020B). 19-20.040 Initiation by petition—Public hearinq. After the notices of the hearing required in Section 19'20'080 are given, the Assembly shall hold a public hearing upon the necessity for the proposed improvement. The Assembly shall fix the time and place of the public hearing which may be continued from time to time as the Assembly may decide. After hearing interested persons favoring or opposing the proposed improvement, the Assembly may decrease the extent or value of the improvement or may delete from the district properties not benefited in whole or in part by the improvement. No change may be made resulting in an improvement district wherein the property signed for would not bear more than 50% of the estimated assessed costs, unless sufficient other property owners are added to the petition prior to Assembly action on the petition. (Adapted from CAC 3'08.040 and GAAB 11'10.020C). 19.20.050 Initiation by petition--Assembly action. After the public hearing is closed, the Assembly shall adopt an ordinance determining either to proceed or not to proceed with the proposed improvement. The ordinance to ' ■ proceed shall find that the improvement is necessary and of benefit to the properties to be assessed, and that the petition for the improvement has been signed by sufficient and proper patit]oners. The findings of the Assembly are conclusive. The ordinance shall contain a description of the improvement and its location, the estimated cost of the improvement, the authorized percentage of the costs or rate to be assessed against the properties in the district, and a description of the properties to be assessed. The properties shall be defined by legal description as recorded in the latest municipal tax roll. The ordinance shall require an account to be kept of all costs of the improvement and direct the mayor to record the ordinance with the district recorder and to prepare the assessment ro|!' (Adapted from CAC 3.08.050, GAAB 11,10.020D and new). 19.20,060 Initiation by petition—Assessment roll.' After the improvement has been completed 'and the costs of the improvement computed, the mayor shall prepare an assessment roll for the special assessment district. The assessment roll shall contain as to each parcel to be assessed a brief description or designation of the property, the name of the owner or reputed owner of the property to be assessed and the amount assessed against the property. When the assessment roll is completed, the Assembly shall fix a time and place for a public hearing on objections to the assessment roll. The notices required in Section 19'20.030 shall be given. ,(Adapted from CAC 3'08'060 and QAAB 11.10.020E). 19,20.070 Initiation by petition--Public hearing--Objections. At the public hearing an owner of property to be assessed shall have the right to present his objection to the assessment roll by showing errors and inequalities in the assessment roll and submitting any reason for amendment and correction of the assessment roll. The public hearing may be continued from time to time as the Assembly shall decide. After the public hearing, the Assembly may correct any error or inequality in the assessment roll. When the roll is finally determined, the clerk shall so certify. (CAC 3.08.070 and <3AAB 11.10.020F)' 19-7 19-20.080 Initiation by petition--Confirmation of assessment roll. After the public hearing and determination of the '} assessment roll, the Assembly by resolution shall confirm the special assessment roll of the special assessment district. The resolution shall provide for the levy and the payment schedule of the assessment. (CAC 3.08.080 and adapted from GAAB 11.10.020G). 19.20,090 ' Initiation by petition--Public haarina--No1ice. Notice by publication and mail shall be given of any public hearing required in Sections 13.20.020 through '080. Notice of the public hearing shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the municipality at least once a week for two consecutive weeks prior to the time fixed for the hearing. The administration shall, at least 15 days prior to the hearing, send by first-class mail to each owner of' pro Perty to be assessed, at his last known address, a written notice. The notice to be published shall include a summary of the improvement, the designation of the properties to be assessed in the special assessment district, the purpose of the public hearing, and the time and place fixed for the public hearing. The notice by mail shall include a summary of the improvement, the designation of the addressee's property to be assessed, the purpose of the public hearing, the amount of estimated or actual assessment against the property and ,the time and place fixed for the public- hearing. Each notice shall generally inform the property owner of the manner and method of protesting or objecting to the action to be taken at the public hearing. (Adapted from CAC 3.08.090 and GAAB 11'10'020H)' 19,20,100 Initiation by Assembly--Authorized. The Assembly by motion or other action may direct or authorize the mayor to make a report on a proposed Assembly-initiated special assessment district. (Adapted from CAC 3.08'100 and GAAB 11.10.030\' 19.20-110 Initiation by Assembly--Action by mayor. Upon direction or authorization of the Assembly, the mayor shall make a report to the Assembly concerning the district. The report shall contain the same information as set forth in Section 19.20.030, and may be made either before or at the time of a public hearing on the necessity for the 19-8 proposed improvement. At the time of the hearing, the mayor shall report to the Assembly concerning the number of property owners protesting in writing that was recorded with the clerk as of the close of business on the day preceding the hearing, and state the percentage of the estimated cost the protesting owners represent. (Adapted from CAC :3.08.110). 19.20.120 Initiation by Assembly—Public hearing. The Assembly shall hold a public hearing on the necessity for the local improvement after the notice of hearing required in Section 19.20.178 is given. The Assembly shall fix the time and place of the public hearing which may be continued from time to time as the Assembly decides. If protests in writing as to the necessity of a local improvement are filed with the clerk prior to or at the hearing by the owners of property who shall bear 50% or more of the estimated assessed cost of the improvement, the Assembly shall not proceed with the improvement until the protests have been reduced to less than 50%. After hearing all interested persons favoring or opposing the proposed improvement, the Assembly may decrease the extent or value of the improvement, and may delete from the district properties not benefited by the improvement. (Adapted from CAC 3.08.120). , 18.20'130 Initiation by Assembly--Assembly action. After the public hearing is closed, the Assembly shall adopt an ordinance determining either to proceed or not to proceed with the proposed improvement. The ordinance to proceed shall find that the improvement is necessary and will benefit the properties within the district' The findings of the Assembly are conclusive. The ordinance shall contain the same information as set forth in Section 13'20.050' The properties shall be defined by legal description as recorded in the latest municipal tax roll. The ordinance shall require an account to be kept of all coots of the improvement and direct the mayor to record the ordinance with the district recorder and to prapare the assessment roll. (Adapted from CAC 3'08.130). 19.20.140 Initiation by Assembly---Assessment roll. After the improvement has been completed and the costs of the irnprbvementoomputed, the mayor shall prepare an „P assessment roll for the special assessment district. The assessment roll shall contain as to each parcel of property to be assessed a brief description or designation of the parcel, the name of the owner or reputed owner of the parcel and the amount assessed against the parcel. When the assessment roll is completed, the Assembly shall fix a time and place for a public hearing on objections to the assessment roll. The notices required in Section 19.20.170 shall be given of the hearing. (CAC 3.08.140 and GAAB 11.10.030H). 19.20'150 Initiation by Assembly--Public hearing-- Objections. At the public hearing an owner of property to be assessed shall have the right to present his objection to the assessment roll by showing errors and inequalities in the assessment roll and submitting any reason for amendment or correction of the assessment roll. The public hearing may be continued from time to time as the Assembly shall decide. After the public hearing, the Assembly may correct any error or inequality in the assessment roll. When the roll is finally determined, the clerk shall so certify. (CAC 3.08.150 and GAAB 11.18'030)' 19'20.160 Initiation by Assembly--Confirmation of assess- ment roll. After the public hearing and determination of the assessment roll, the Assembly by resolution shall confirm the special assessment roll of the special assessment district. The resolution shall provide for the levy and payment schedule of the assessments. (CAC 3.08.160 and adapted from GAAB 11'10.030J). 19.20'170 Initiation by Assembly--Public hearing--Notice. Notice by publication and mail shall be given of any public hearing required in Sections 19.20.180 through '160 in the same manner as set forth in Section 18,20.090, (Adapted from CAC 3.08.170 and GAAB 11]0.030K). 19.20.180 Assembly ordinance--Filed of record. A. The administration shall file on record with the district recorder all ordinances creating or establishing assessment districts. B. Failure to file an ordinance as required by subsection A shall not operate as to impair any right or interest the municipality has in any property within an assessment district under applicable municipal ordinances or state law. (Adapted from CAC 3.08.180). 19.20.190 Property assessed. The Assembly may assess for an improvement any real property specially benefited, or any interest in real property specially benefited, and the property specially benefited may include abutting, adjoining., adjacent, contiguous, noncontiguous or other property or interests in property benefited directly or indirectly by the improvement. The property to be assessed may include any property which is otherwise for any reason exempt from taxation by law. A benefited property may be included in whole or in part in more than one special assessment district. (CAC 3.08.200 and GAAB 11.15.010A). 19.20.200 Property subject to Horizontal Property Regimes Act. In the case of a parcel which, but for the provisions of the Alaska Horizontal Property Regimes Act, would be specially assessed for a portion of the costs of a public improvement as set forth in this title, the assessment which would otherwise be levied against the parcel shall be levied pro rata against each apartment according to its appurtenant percentage interest in the common areas and facilities. (new). 19.20.210 • Planned unit developments. Parcels containing planned unit developments not subject to the Alaska Horizontal Property Regimes Act and which include lands held both individually and in common shall have their proportionate share of an assessment levied against the common ownership only. (new). 19.20.220 Property owner determination. The owner or owners listed on the latest municipal tax roll as the owner of the property to be assessed is presumed to be the legal owner of the property. If the property owner is unknown the property may be assessed in the name of the "unknown owner." If the property is correctly described, no assessment is invalidated by a mistake, omission or error in the name of the owner. (Adapted from CAC 3.08.210 and GAAB 11.15.010C). 19 -11 � 19'20'230 Amount assessed. The Assembly may assess 100% of any or all costs of a public improvement against the parcels of property benefited ,> by the improvement. Unless a specific method of computing the benefit to the property and ascertaining the amount to be assessed against the property is expressly provided in this title, the Assembly shall assess each parcel of property in a special assessment district as set forth in Chapter 19'65' (Adapted from CAC 3.08'220). 19'20'240 Time payment periods. Unless otherwise set forth under particular sections of Title 19, time payment schedules for payment of assessments for the various improvements shall be adopted by the Assembiy by resolution, and may be adjusted from time to time in the same, manner ' (new)' 18.20.250 Assessment notices. Within 30 days after the resolution confirming the assessment roll and fixing the date of delinquency, the treasurer shall mail a notice to any owners of property -whose assessment, schedule of payrnents, delinquencies, or amount of penalty or interest has been changed as a result of the hearing on the assessment roll. The notice shall designate the property, the amount of the assessment, the schedule of payments and delinquencies and the amount of the penalty and interest. Not more than 60 nor less than 30 days before the date the assessment or the first installment of the assessment nt becomes delinquent, the tr ea su rer shall mail a paymen t notice to each property owner, but the failure to mali the notice shall in no way affect any liability for or enforcement of payment of all or any part of the special assessment. (Adapted from CAC 3.08'460). 19,20.200 Assessment payment—Delinquency—Interest and penalty. The Assembly in the resolution confirming the assessment roll shall fix a schedule of dates when the special assessment or special assessment installment payment becomes due and delinquent. Deferred or installment payments nnaY bear interest, at a rate not to exceed the effective interest rate of the last bonds sold to finance similar improvements, from the date of the confirmation of the assessment roll until paid. No payment shall be required before 60 days after the 19-12 resolution. A penalty of 8% shall be added to any assessment or ' assessment installment not paid before the date of delinquency, and both the unpaid amount and penalty shall draw interest at the rate of 8% per year until paid. Penalty and interest may be waived by the chief fiscal officer where the sum does not exceed $200.00 and .such penalty and interest accrued through no fault of the property owner so assessed. The Assembly may waive penalty and interest where the sum exceeds $200.00 and such penalty and interest accrued through no fault of the property owners so assessed. (Adapted from 19.20.270 Lien--Procedure for collection. A special assessment shall, from the time the special assessment is levied in the resolution confirming the assessment roil, be a first lien prior and paramount to all liens except municipal real property tax liens and prior special assessments, upon the property assessed and the lien shall be of the same character, effect and duration as a lien for municipal real property taxes. A lien for a special assessment may be collected, foreclosed and otherwise enforced in accordance with the procedures provided by law for the collection, foreclosure and enforcement of municipal tax iiens on real property. No person shall have any right to repurchase or redeem the tax-foreclosed property after the expiration of the redemption period and the property has been devoted to a public purpose Or use by the municipality, or has been sold at public auction. The municipality may devote the property to a public purpose or use by resolution or other action of the Assembly showing the Assembly's intent to devote the property to a public purpose or use. The Assembly shall have the cumulative remedy for collection of a special assessment by civil action against the property owner for debt or mortgage foreclosure with the right of redemption as provided by law for real prop- erty mortgage foreclosures. The remedies provided by this sec- tion apply also to reassessments. (Adapted from CAC 3.08.480 and Charter, §9.02(c)). 18.20.280 Early payoff. ./ An assessment may be paid on or before any due date. When so paid the following procedures will be followed: A. Assessments levied prior to March 1, 1964, which are paid in full, shall be discounted in accordance with the discount schedule in effect at the time the assessment Was levied. 19-13 • (SUpp. #14 3/31/81) = B . Upon prepayment in full of all remaining unpaid annual in- stallments of a special assessment for improvements / authorized to proceed after March 1, 1964, the sum col- lected will be the unpaid principal, unpaid costs, unpaid penalty, unpaid delinquent interest 'and the accrued unpaid bond interest. C. Bond interest will accrue on a monthly basis. \f an assessment made after March 1, 1964 does not include bond interest for deferred or installment payments, none will be col lected. O. Deferred or installment payments may bear interest at a rate not to exceed the effective interest rate.of the last bonds sold to finance similar improvements from the date established for a first payment until paid in full. (Adapted from CAC 3.08.471, am AO 81-6). 19.20,290 Limitations on suits and actions. No special essassMent shall be contested in any civil action, unless commenced within 60 days after the confirmation of the special assessment roll. |f no such action be so com- menced, the procedure shall be conclusively presumed to have been regular and complete. (Adapted from CAC 3.08.490 and Charter, §9.02(d)). 19.20,300 Waiver of objections. The irregularity or invalidity of any special assessment or' procedure is waived and may not be contested or questioned in any manner in any proceeding whatsoever by any person not filing a written objection to the assessment roll prior to its [�� l con- firmation. (CAC 3.08.500). l9 14 #14 3/3�/8l - , u�p,� ^ t -- 19.20.310 Cumulative enforcement. The collection, foreclosure or enforcement of any installment or any part of a special assessment shall not bar, prevent or otherwise extinguish the right of the municipality to collect, foreclose or enforce the payment of any other installment or part of the same or any other special assessment. (CAC 3.08.510). 19.20.320 Appeal. The decision of the Assembly upon any objection to the assessment roll may be reviewed by the' Superior Court, Third Judicial District, Alaska, in the manner provided by law. (CAC 3.08.520). 19.20.330 Application of state law. The municipality retains any right or procedure, not otherwise inconsistent with the provisions of this title, granted by law to a first -class or home rule charter municipality for local improvements and special assessments. (CAC 3.08.530). 19.20.340 Correction of invalid special assessments. A. If any special assessment procedure of the Assembly is irregular or invalid for any reason, the Assembly may correct the same at any time within 90 days after the confirmation of the special assessment roll or after final determination of any litigation thereon, whether before or after the completion of the local improvement to which the special assessment applies. B. In the event that a court of competent jurisdiction orders that any or all of a special assessment may not be assessed or enforced by the Assembly because of any irregular or invalid special assessment procedure, the Assembly may make a new assessment or reassessment upon the properties specially benefited' by the improvement by adopting a resolution to make a new assessment or a reassessment of the properties specially benefited by the improvement. The Assembly in the resolution shall provide for the time and date of a public hearing on the new assessment or reassessment, shall direct the preparation of the assessment roll and assess the appropriate assessment against the property in the district. The procedures set forth in Sections 19.20.140 through '170 'shall be followed in making the new assessment or reassessment, unless that procedure is in conflict With this section, in which event the provisions of this section shall apply. The previous findings of benefit and necessity for the improvement shall continue in full force and effect in any assessment or reassess- mentun|ess invalidated by a court order. C. In the event that findings of necessity and benefit are necessary to correct the irregular or invalid special assessment, the Assembly may proceed to make a new assessment or reassessment of the property specially benefited by initiating a special assessment district in accordance with Sections 19.20-100 through .170, O. in any new assessment or reassessment by the Assembly all sums paid upon the former assessment shall be credited to the property upon any new assessment or reassessment and the new assessment or reassessment ,shall to that extent be deemed satisfied. If a refund, rather than a credit, is determined, then the Assembly in the resolution confirming the assessment roll shall provide for a refund to the person having paid the amount of assessment to be refunded. No interest or penalty shall be charged on the original • assessment. E. The new assessment or reassessment when completed shall be enforced and collected in the .same manner as other special assessments. (Adapted from CAC 3.08.540). 19.20.350 Dissolution of assessment district. An assessment district created to finance a capital improvement maybe dissolved by Assembly resolution at any time after the district's share of the cost of the improvement has been paid. An assessment district created to finance a service may not be dissolved without the approval of the property owners who bear more than 50% of the cost of providing the service. (Adapted from Charter, G9.02(b))' 19-16 �`� ~-` Chapter 19'30 CALCULATION OF IMPROVEMENT COSTS Sections: 19.30.010 19.30.020 19.30.030 19.30.040 19.30.050 19.30.060 19.30.070 ?S.3O.08O 19.30.090 Property subject to assessment. Reduction in area subject to sanitary sewer assessment. Costs of improvement. Assessed project costs. Calculation of construction contract costs. Definition of last approved estimate. Contract bids exceeding estimate. Previously constructed work. Application of chapter. 19'30'O10 . The Assembly may assess for an improvement any real property specially benefited, or any interest in real property specially benefited, and the property specially benefited may include abutting, adjoining, adjacent, contiguous, noncontiguous or other property or interests in property benefited directly or indirectly by the improvement. The property to be assessed may include any property which is otherwise for any reason exempt from taxation by law, except as provided in AS 29'63'065. A benefited property may be included in whole or in' part in more than one special assessment district. (Adapted from GRAB 11'15'O1OA)' 19.30.020 Reduction in area subject to sanitary sewer assessment. A property to be assessed for sanitary sewers which has a total unsubdivided area of four acres or more shall be reduced in net assessable area by 30% prior to assessment. Such reduction is for the purpose of setting aside future rights-of-way, sewer and public use of easements. Easements and land already dedicated to public use shall be included in the 30% exclusion. (GA/\811.15.01OB)' 19-17 19.30.030 Costs of improvement. The costs of an improvement shall be the actual costs of the improvement/ including acquisition of interests in land for the improvement, design, engineering/ administration, overhead, professional services, bond costs and interest incurred as a result of the improvement, and all other costs resulting from the construction of the improvement. Bond interest shall be calculated from the first date when any actual costs are incurred by the municipality. Assessable costs shall be as provided in Sections 19.30'040 and 19'30.080. (Adapted from CAC 3.08.230 and new). 19.38.040 Assessed project costs. The project costs assessed against benefited parcels shall be the least of the following: (1) construction contract costs plus 20% for non-contract costs including but not limited to engineering and design, surveys, soil investigations, right-of-way negotiations, inspection and contract supervision, and interest costs, plus actual property acquisition costs; (2) the last approved estimate plus 10%; or (3) the total cost of the improvement- less the amount of any grant the municipality uses to defray the cost of the project. (Adapted from GAAB 11'15.O10E/ am AO 77-342). 19'30'050 Calculation of construction contract costs. For the purpose of this chapter, construction contract costs shall be defined as the costs paid by the municipaity to the contraCtor except that when improvement districts are constructed by municipal construction personnel, construction contract costs shall be those costs accumulated by personnel actually performing the work in the improvement district and their on-site supervisors along with the equipment and supplies used to compete the work. (GAAB 77,15'O10F). 19'30.000 Definition of last approved estimate. ' For the purppse of this chapter, last approved estimate means the estimate of assessed project costs made by the municipality and approved by owners of property which wi|} bear more than 50% of the cost of the improvement' ln the event more than one such cost estimate is made/ the amount contained in the cost estimate which was approved last in period of time shall be deemed to be the last approved estimate. (Adapted from GAAB 11.15'O1OG)' 19-18 (Supp. #1 12/31/77\ 19.30.070 Contract bids exceeding estimate. In the event the lowest acceptable bid exceeds the last approved estimate by 10% .or more, no contract shall be awarded unless, after notification of the increase in estimated costs, the owners who vvou|d bear more than 50% of the estimated cost of the improvement request that the contract be awarded. Within the time allowed for acceptance of the bid, should owners of property bearing more than 50% of the cost of the improvements fail to request award of the contract, or if objections are filed, in writing, by owners of property which will bear 50% or more of the cost of the improvement, the project shall be discontinued and the costs to date shall be borne by the municipality. (Adapted from GAAB 11.15.O1OH, am AO 78-220). 19.30.080 Previously constructed vvOrk. The total assessed project costs for any assessment district where credit for salvageable work is to be given as provided in Section 19.40.110 shall include the costs of all .such previously constructed improvements. All references in Sections 19.]0.0]0 through .070 to costs and estimates of any kind shall be understood to �-` include all costs previously expended for salvageable ; improvements relative to property within the assessment district. (new). 19.30.090 Application of chapter. This chapter does not apply to water improvements constructed pursuant to tariffs filed with the Alaska Public Utilities Commission by the Anchorage Water Utility. (new). 19-19 (Supp. 05 12/31/78) • Chapter 19,40 ALLOCATION OF, STREET IMPROVEMENT COSTS Sections: 19,40.070 Definitions. 19,40.020 Street improvements. 19 .40. 030 Extent o f special assessment essmen t district . 18,40.035 Assessment ofcu|-de-tacs, 19.40.040 Total assessment. 19.40.050 Zones. 19,40.060 Rate of assessment between intersections. 19.40.070 Intersections—Rate of assessment. 19.40.080 Driveway and curb cuts--Rate of assessment. 19.40.090 Sewer and water connections--Rate of assessment. 19.4.100 Arterial and collector streets. 19.40.110 Credit for salvageable work. 19.40.120 Assessment for double and triple frontage lots. 19,40.130 Adjustments due to elevation differentia}: 19,40.140 Municipal participation in costs. 19.40.150 Parcels assessed by other methods. 19,40.010 Definitions. As used in Sections 19,40.0I0 through ,090: A. "Centerline" of a block means that line which is at all points equidistant from the rights-of-way defining the opposite boundaries of the block or 90 feet from the margin line of the street to be improved, whichever distance is greater. B. "Driveway" means that portion of a street, alley or sidewalk requiring special or different construction because of the presence of an abutting driveway upon the benefited property. C. "Intersection" means that portion of property enclosed by the intersection of the street margin lines of inter- secting streets. D. "Margin lines" mean the boundaries of the right-of-way generally lzara||e| to the street to be improved, and within which a street to be improved may be constructed. 19-20 (Supp. tf.l4 3/31/81l ° E. "Right-of-way" means any publicly owned property interest within which a street or related public improvement is or may be constructed. F. "Street to be improved" means any street, road, parkway, alley, curb and gutter, or sidewalk between intersections within the special assessment district. (CAC 3.08,240 and new). 19.40.030 Street improvements. Street improvements, for purposes of assessing costs under this chapter, consist of all permanent road improvements which are constructed within public rights-of-way of whatever nature, public use or road easements, or on lands leased for road usage. They include gravel improvements, paving with asphalt to a minimum two-inch thickness, curb and gutter, sidewalks and similar items. Road work such as grading, ditching, temporary surfacing and similar items which are not part of a finally constructed improvement shall be assessed under the provisions of Chapter 19.65 unless included in an ordinance establishing a street improvement district, (new). 19.40.030 Extent of special assessment district. A street special assessment district shall include, unless otherwise provided by the ordinance to proceed with the district, the property to be assessed for each street and each street intersection to be improved. Assessments may be made for driveways and curb cuts: Unless otherwise provided in the ordinance to proceed with the district, the- area specially bene- fited by a street to be improved shall include all the property lying between the centerline of the subject block and the margin line along the entire length of the street to be improved. Unless otherwise provided in the ordinance to proceed with the district, the area specially benefited by the intersection improvement includes all the property, except streets and alleys, within each areO, bounded by the marginal lines of the intersecting streets an d the centerlines of eac h abutting or adjacent block relative to the respective marginal lines at the intersecting streets. In the event no reasonable centerline of a block may be established, the distance from the margins to the centerlines shall be the same distance as established in an adjacent block, or that which results in an assessment propor- tionate to the benefit received from and the burden imposed on the improvement. In the case of planned unit developments A. The products of the number of square feet of property within zones first, second, third and fourth, respectively, and the numbers 45, 25, 20 and 10, respectively, shall be ascertained and their total sum taken, which total sum shall be divided into the costs of the improvement in order to determine the quotient. or other and uses where the rights-of-way within the parcel are not dedicated to the public, or blocks which contain one or more cul-de-sacs which are assessed under AMC 19.40.035, the centerline of the block shall be estab- lished in the same manner as if the property were unsubdivided. (Adapted from CAC 3.08.250 and new, am AO 81~29). 19.40.035 Assessment of cul-de-sacs. Unless otherwise provided in the ordinance autho- rizing the district., the area specially benefited by any improve- ment .b] a cul-de-sac street shall include all property lying within 90 feet of the right-of-way along the entire length of the street to be improved. (/\O 81-29). 19.40.040 Total assessment. Total assessment for each parcel of property shall be com- puted by adding the assessment for the improvement between intersections, the assessment, if any, for the improvement within the intersection, and any individual assessment against that parcel for a driveway or curb cut. (Adapted from CAC 3.08.260). 19,40.050 Zones. The property abutting or adjoining the street to be improved shall be divided into zones paralleling the margins of the street to be improved and numbered first, second, third and fourth. The first zone shall include all property lying be- tween the margins and lines parallel with and 30 feet from the margins. The second zone shall include all property lying be- tween lines parallel with and 30 feet and 60 feet from the margins. The third zone shall include all property lying be- tw'ean lines parallel with and 60 feet and 90 feet from the margins. The fourth zone shall include all property, if any, lying between lines parallel with and 90 feet from the margins and the outer boundary of the district. (CAC 3.08.270). 19.40.060 Rate of assessment between intersections. The assessment per square foot for the improvement be- tween intersections and special benefits conferred on a square foot of land in zones first, second, third and fourth, respec- tively, shall be weighted in the same proportion as are the numbers 45, 25, 20 and 10, respectively. The assessment shall be computed in the following manner: 19-Z2 ``` (Supp. #14 3/31/81) tr, The products of the quotient derived in subsection A and the numbers 45, 25, 20 and 10 shall be the respective rates of assessment per square foot for zones firSt/ second, third and fourth. C. The amount to be assessed against each parcel shall be the sum of the assessments derived in subsection for each square foot within the parcel. (Adapted from CAC 3.88'280)' The rate of assessment per square foot for an intersection improvement shall be computed by dividing the costs of the intersection improvement by the square footage of the area specially benefited by the intersection improvement within the district, as set forth in Section 19'40'030' (Adapted from CAC 3.08.290l. 19.40'080 Driveway and curb cuts--Raze of assessment. The costs of providing a driveway or curb cut for a property requiring a driveway or curb cut may be assessed. against that property. (CAC 3.08.300). 19-40.090 Sewer and water connections--Rate of assessment. Upon application of the property owner a sanitary sewer or water connection- may be constructed to a property benefited by the street improvement and the costs of the connection may be assessed against that property. (CAC 3.08.310)' 19.40.100 Arterial and collector streets. No assessment will be levied for the improvement of streets designated on the Official Streets and Highways map as arterial and freeway class streets. Streets designated on the Official Streets and Highways map as collector streets will have one-third of their total cost assessed to the benefited properties. (new). 19.40.170 Credit for salvageable work. Where gravel improvements have been constructed under an agreement with the municipality which provides credit for salvageable work, as defined in Section 21'87.025E of this code, the applicable credit will be deducted from the assessment,- .on a lot-by-lot basis, according to the 19-23 subdivider's sworn notarized statement as to how the costs were spread to the applicable lots. In no case, however, shall the credit given exceed the assessment which would otherwise be levied against the same. Failure of the subdivider to provide the municipality with such statement will result in no credit being given. (new). 19.40.120 Assessment for double and triple frontage lots. It is intended, under the method of assessment set forth in this chapter, that no parcel or portion thereof shall, unless otherwise provided, be fully assessed for improvements to more than one frontage street, one side street and one alley. In the case of parcels or portions thereof which would otherwise be fully assessed for improvements to a third or subsequent street, that portion of the cost which would be equivalent to the cost of a standard alley improvement shall be assessed. A standard alley improvement, for the purposes of this section, shall be defined as the standard alley section set forth within the standard construction specifications of the municipality. In no case, however, shall such an alley equivalent share be assessed until after the levying of front and side street assessments against the applicable parcel or portion thereof. (new). 19.40.130 Adjustments due to elevation differential. A lot may be considered for relief from a front street assessment if the elevation differential between the nearest edge of the constructed improvement and the property line exceeds 42 inches. If a retaining wall has been constructed, the base of the wall, commencing at the top of the footing or foundation, will be used in computing elevation differentials. In cases where an improvement, and the top (of a cut section) or toe (of a fill section) of slope falls within the property line, the average elevation at the top or toe shall be used in computing the assessment. Adjustment will be made according to the following table. Where a natural bluff line falls somewhere on the property, but no alteration of the topography has been necessitated by the improvement, no consideration will be given. No lot shall be granted relief from a side street or intersection assessment for reasons of elevation differential. (new). 19 -24 *\� TABLE FOR ELEVATION DIFFERENTIAL FOR PAVING ASSESSMENTS a DIFFERENTIAL DIFFERENTIAL IN FEET ADJUSTMENT IN FEET ADJUSTMENT 3.5 0 12'0 25.755 4.0 1.515 12.5 27'270 4'5 3.030 13.0 .28'785 5.0 4.545 13.5 30'300 5.5 6.060 14.0 31.815 6'0 7,575 14'5 33'330 6.5 9'090 15.0 34.845 7'0 10.885 15'5 38'380 7.5 12.120 16.0 37.875 8'8 13.635 16'5 39'390 8.5 15'150 17.0 40.905 3'0 16.665 17'5 • 42'420 9'5 18.180 18.0 43.935 10'0 18.695 18.5 45'450 10.5 21.210 19.0 % 46.496 11'0 22.725 19.5 48.480 11.5 24.240 20.0 or more 50'000 19'40,140 /Nunidpal participation in costs. When assessments are waived or equivalent costs of lesser improvements are assessed, as provided in Sections 19'40'100, '120 and '130, the unassessed share of costs against the applicable lots shall not be spread to the remaining properties in the district but shall be borne by the municipality. (new). 13.40'150 Parcels assessed by other methods. Where parcels included in street assessment districts already have been assessed for streets under some method other than that set forth in this chapter, the amount of assessment shall be so adjusted that the total assessment to those parcels shall not exceed the total assessment that would have been levied under the original method of assessment. Any portions of potential assessments not levied through this provision shall be paid by the municipaUty. (new). `-~ Chapter 19.50 ALLOCATION OF OFF-STREET PARKING COSTS Sections: 19,50.010 Off-street parking improvement--Extent of district. 19.50.020 Zones. 19.50.030 Rate of assessment. 19.50.040 Overlapping assessments. 19'50.010 Off-street parking improvement--Extent of district. An off-street parking facility special assessment district shall include all the prop2rty within the bouridaries established by the Assembly, and all property included within the district shall be considered the property specially benefited by the off-street parking facility. The facility may consist of surface or underground facilities, improved or unimproved lots, single or multiple garages, other structures and accessories, or any combination of these. (CAC 3'08'340l' 19'50.020 Zones. The district shall be divided into zones paralleling the margin of the off-street parking facility and numbered first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth. The first zone shall include all the property lying between the margins and lines parallel with and 50 feet from the margins. The second zone shall include all 'property lying between lines parallel with and 50 feet and 100 feet, respectively, from the margins. The third zone shall include all property lying between lines parallel with and 100 feet and 150 feet, respectively, from the margins. The fourth zone shall include all property lying between lines parallel with and 150 feet and 200 feet, respectively, from the margins. The fifth zone shall include all property lying between lines parallel with and 200 feet and 250 feet, respectively, from the margins. The sixth zone shall include all property lying between lines parallel with and 250 feet and 300 feet, respectively, from the margins. The seventh zone shall include all property lying between lines Chapter 19'55 ALLOCATION OF COST OF WATER IMPROVEMENTS Sections: 19'55'010 Allocation of cost of water improvements. 19,55.010 Allocation of cost of water improvements. The cost of capital improvements to provide water service shall be allocated in the manner and according to the criteria provided in the approved tariff of the Anchorage Water Utility. (AO 77-345). ^` parallel with and 300 feet and 350 feet, respectively, from the margins. The eighth zone shall include all lands, if any, lying between a line parallel with and 350 feet from the margins and the boundary of the district. (CAC 3.08`350l' 19.50.030 Rate of assessment. The rate of assessment per square foot of land for the facility shall be determined on the basis that special benefits conferred on a square foot of land in zones first, second, third, fourth, fifth/ sixth, seventh, and eighth, respectively, are weighted in the same proportion as are the numbers 9, 8, 6, 5, 3, 2, 1 and 1, respectively. The rate shali be computed in the following manner: A. The products of the number of square feet cf property within the zones first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth, respectively, and the numbers 9, 8, 6, 5, 3, 2, 1 arid 1, respectively, shall be ascertained and their total sum taken, which total sum shall be divided into the costs of the improvement in order to determine the quotient. 8. The products of the resulting quotient and the numbers 9, 8, 6, 5, 3, 2, 1, and 1, respectively, shall be the respective rates of assessment per square foot for zones first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth, respectively. C. The amount to be assessed against each parcel of property to be assessed is computed by adding the products of the rate and the square footage for each zone within the parcel. (CAC 3.08.360)' 19,50.040 Overlapping assessments. In the event 'a parcel of property within the district is included in zones established for other off-street parking facility districts, then the assessment computed from each district shall be added to obtain the total assessment for any one parcel, except that the total assessment against the parcel shall not exceed the highest rate per square foot in the first zone of any district. (CAC 3.08.370). 19-28 Chapter 19.80 CONVERSION OF ELECTRIC AND TELEPHONE FACILITIES Sections: 19.60'010 Definitions. 19'60'020 Designation of times. 18.60.030 Amount of assessment. 19.80.040 Service facilities assessment. 19.60'050 Disconnection notice. 19 8O 88O Disconnection for noncompliance. ' ' 13.60.070 Violations designated. '19,60'080 Violations deemed nuisance' 19.60'010 Definitions. "Convert" or "conversion" means the removal of all or any part of any existing overhead municipal electric or telephone facilities and replacement of the facilities with underground electric or telephone facilities constructed at the same or different locations. (CAC 3.08.380)' 19.60'020 Designation of times. The resolution to proceed with a special assessment district for the conversion of municipal electric and telephone facilities shall designate: A. The date on which all electric or telephone service shall be constructed, reconstructed, relocated or converted by the property owners as required by subsection B of this section; B. The date on which the electric or telephone service shall be changed over from the overhead to the underground facilities; and ' C. The date by which the overhead facilities to be converted shall be removed by the property owners. (CAC 3.08,380), 19.60.030 Amount of assassment. The cost of converting telephone and electric facilities, other than facilities installed to serve an individual property owner, shall be in compliance with the applicable utility tariff. Assessments for those facilities shall be apportioned against the individual properties benefited on the basis of the front footage of the properties adjacent to, bounding or abutting the facilities to be converted, including properties burdened with an easement upon which the facilities are to be constructed. The cost for the conversion of service facilities installed to serve an individual property owner shall be assessed against the property in compliance with the applicable utility tariff. (CAC 3.08.400). 19.60.040 Service facilities assessment. The electric and telephone facilities located without an easement for that purpose upon each property within the special assessment district shall be constructed, reconstructed, relocated or converted by the property owner at his own expense. Such work may be done by the municipality, and the cost of the work added to and included in the special assessment to be levied against the property, if the property owner executes and files with the clerk a written request: A. Authorizing the municipality to enter upon the property for such purposes; and B. Waiving the right of protest or objection to the performance of such work and the inclusion of the costs in the assessment. The request shall be filed with the clerk not later than the date of the award of the contract for the construction of the conversion, unless the municipality shall approve such request. Any facilities required to be furnished by the property owner shall thereafter constitute part of the system of utility involved. (CAC 3'08.410)' 18.80.050 Disconnection notice. The notice required by Section 19.20.090 of this chapter shall further notify each property Owner of the provisions of Section 19.60.040 and that unless Section 19.60.040 is complied with all structures located upon the property will be subject to disconnection from the municipal electric or telephone facilities providing service to the property. (CAC 3.08.420)' 19.60.060 Disconnection for noncompliance. If the property owner fails to comply with the requirements of Sections 19'60.040 and .050/ the municipality may disconnect and remove all overhead &ectric and telephone facilities providing service to any structure located upon the property. Written notice of the proposed disconnection shall be given at least five days prior to the disconnection by posting the notice in a conspicuous place upon the structure served. (Adapted from CAC 3.08.430)' 19'60'070 Violations designated. It is unlawful for any person: A. To construct or place any electric or telephone overhead facilities within any special assessment district when established for the conversion of such telephone or electric facilities; or B.. To neglect to remove any electric or tetephone overhead facilities after five days from the time designated in the resolution to proceed. Each seven-day period of failure to comply with any provision of this subsection shall constitute a separate offense. (Adapted from CAC 3'08'440)' 19.60.080 Violations deemed nuisance. Each of the unlawful acts defined and set forth in Section 19'60'070 is likewise a nuisance and may be abated by the municipal attorney in the manner provided for the abatement of nuisances. (CAC 3.08.450). Chapter 19,65 `\ ALLOCATION OF OTHER NON-SEWER Sections: 19.65.010 19.65.020 IMPROVEMENT COSTS Amount of assessment. Permitted allocation of cost methods. 19.65.010 Amount of assessment. Each separate parcel of property within a special assessment district for parks, recreation areas and open spaces, changes in channels of streams or watercourses, or bridges, culverts, bulkheads, embankments or dikes for streams or watercourses, fallout, or disaster shelters, sprinkling, oiling, drainage, snow removal and other miscellaneous improvements or services shall be assessed in an amount not to exceed its proportionate share of two-thirds of the cost of the improvement, except those cases in which the Assembly determines that the municipality will not participate in the cost of the improvements. In such a case where the improvement district Is to pay lO0- � of the cost of the improvement, the municipality may authorize a district initiated ../ by the owners of property which will Eear at least 75% of the estimated coat of the improvement sought by the petition and such petitioners request and agree to pay their proportionate share of 100% of the cost of the improvement for the purchase of such property necessary for the improvement requested by their petition. However, nothing in this section is intended to relieve the municipality of the responsibility to participate to its proportionate share in the costs of any assessed improvements when the municipality owns benefited property within the boundaries of the assessment district. (Adapted from CAC 3.08.320 and new). 19.65.020 Permitted allocation of cost methods. The petition for creation of a special assessment district may set forth in general terms the proposed allocation of costs among benefited properties, including: A. Allocation of costs on a zone basis; --� B. Allocation of costs on a front-foot basis; C. Allocation of costs on a square-foot basis; O. Allocation of costs on a per lot basis so that each lot is assessed the same amount; or E. Allocation of costs on any other reasonable basis•which results in an assessment proportionate to the benefit received from, and the burden imposed on the improvement or service. If the petition does not set forth a proposed method for allocating costs of the improvements, and if other portions of this chapter or applicable tariffs do not set forth a specific method of allocation, the Assembly may adopt any of the above methods. If the petition does set forth a proposed method for allocating costs, the Assembly may reject the petition if it finds that the proposed method does not result in assessments proportionate to the benefit received from and the burden impooad•upon the improvement or service. Any determination made by the Assembly with respect to the method of allocating costs is final. (new). --- \ / Chapter. 19'70 ALLOCATION OF COST OF SEWER IMPROVEMENTS Sections: ) / 19.70.010 Allocation of cost of sewer improvements. 18'70'010 Allocation of cost of sewer improvements. The cost of capital improvements to provide sewer service shall be allocated in the manner and according to the criteria provided in the approved tariff of the Anchorage Municipal Sewer Utility. (new). 19-34 ^,^ Chapter 19'80 PERMISSION TO ENTER SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS Sections: 19.80,010 19.80.020 19.80.030 19.80.040 19.80.050 19.80.060 19.80.070 19.80.080 19.80.090 19.80.100 19.80.110 19.80.120 19.80.130 19.80.140 19.80.150 19.80.160 19.80.170 19.80.180 Permission to enter sewer improvement district. Property within the sewer improvement district. Improvements to be performed. Assessment of improvement costs. Property benefited. When assessments are levied. Previous assessment for same service. Payment of assessments. Time payments. Defrayed costs. Supplemental charges. Funds expended. Apportionment of sewer assessment. Assessment of public lands conveyed to private ownership. Public installations. Plans and estimated costs. Construction of improvements. Publication, objection and commencement of work. 19'80.010 Permission to enter sewer improvement district. An improvement district for the engineering, design and construction of sanitary sewer facilities within the yvlunicipaUty of Anchorage is hereby established and designated as Sanitary Sewer Improvement District No. 20 of the Municipality of Anchorage and maybe commonly known as the "permission to enter" sanitary sewer improvement district. (GAAB 11.20.010). 19'80.020 Property within the sewer improvement district. The improvement district shall consist of the parcels which are connected to sanitary sewers of the Municipality of Anchorage during any period between January 1 and December 31 for which lateral and trunk assessments or charges in lieu of assessment have not been levied or paid. (Adapted from GAAB 11.20.020 and AO 77-22). 19'80'030 Improvements to be performed. The improvements to be performed within the improve- ment district shall consist of the engineering, design and construction of sanitary sewers within the improvement district, including but not limited to engineering, design, right-of-way acquisition, financing, and construction of sewer trunks, sewer laterals, connecting trunks and outfalls as needed, serving the improvement district to provide adequate sanitary sewer service at a cost to be determined by the average square footage costs for lateral service as assessed for lateral improvement districts during the previous fiscal year and adjusted by the difference in the Engineering News-Record Construction Costs Index from the date of award of the construction contract to the beginning of the fiscal year in which the permission-to-enter rate is effective. Up to 100% of the cost of such improvement, including interest and other charges on bonded indebtedness of the municipality for moneys used in the preparation and construction of the improvements, if any, and.inc|udinQ interest on other moneys used in the preparation and construction of the improvement, shall be assessed against the owners of the property located within the improvement district in the manner hereinafter provided. (GAAB 11.20.030)' 19.80.040 Assessment of improvement costs. Assessment for the cost of the improvement will be levied upon completion thereof. Payment of the pro rata share of the cost of each lot or parcel of land benefited shall be as set forth in Section 19'80'080. SUch assessment of cost shall be levied on a square-foot basis within the improvement district. (GAAB 11'20'040). 18,80.050 Property benefited. All properties, regardless of size, that lie within the designated sanitary sewer improvement district shall be deemed to receive benefits from the sewer system except as described below: A. Lands which constitute dedicated roads, alleys or public use easements, provided that the easements or rights-of-way which allow normal beneficial use of their area shall be assessable. • B. Lands designated by property owners at time of assessment as potential public right-of-way in unsubdivided tracts exceeding four acres in size may be exempted from assessment for both general and direct benefits upon petition by the owner upon assessment. The exemption shall not exceed a total of 30% of the total assessable property. (Adapted from GAAB 11'20.0.50 and AO 77-22). 19,80'080 When assessments are levied. Assessments as herein indicated shall be levied upon completion of sewer construction or other provision of adequate sewer transmission service to the property concerned. (GAAB 11.20'060)' 19'80.070 Previous assessment for same service. No property shall be tw/ceaosessed for the same service by the provisions of this chapter. Properties -showing evidence of previous assessment for sanitary trunk sewers by any public or private agency authorized to levy such assessments shall be exempted from trunk levy for current improvements. (GAAB 11.20.070)' 18-80.080 Payment of assessments. Assessments for the project cost of the improvement will be levied upon completion thereof on a square-foot basis (sewer assessment only). Payment of the pro rata share of the cost of each lot or parcel of land benefited shall be in the amounts as set forth in the following schedule, the first installment being payable after the assessment roll has been approved by the Assembly. $1,500.00 or less 5 equal annual install- ments; $1,500.01 to $4/100.00 $340..00 per appropriate number of installments to retire assessment. Last installment to be in the amo.unt of the outstanding balance; $4.100'01 or more 20 equal annual install- ments, (Adapted from GAAB 11.20.080), • 19'80.090 Time payments. Time payment provisions shall allow payment over the appropriate time period at an annual interest rate equal to that of the average interest paid by the municipality on bonds sold to accomplish the sanitary sewer improvements, but shall not exceed 8%. If any property owner desires to pay the entire cost of his portion of the improvement district assessment on or before any due date, the unearned interest portion of the assessment shali be deducted. (GAAB 11,20.0901. 19.80.100 Defrayed costs. The sanitary trunk sewer system required to provide total transmission of sewage flows for the improvement district proposed may require use of existing publicly or privately owned sewers. Those facilities and their acquisition or amortization may be defrayed as a part of this improvement district by revenues derived from assessments as deemed appropriate from time to time by the Assembly. (GAAB 11'20'100). 19.80,110 Supplemental charges. The assessments hereinbefore described are intended to provide the first costs (capital coots) of a sanitary lateral sewer within the confines of the sewer district and may be supplemented by trunk sewer charges, downstream benefit charges, sewer service charges, and other appropriate levies from time to time as may be required to complete the comprehensive sewer program now proposed. (GAAS 11.20'110). 19.80'128 Funds expended. Funds collected under the provisions of this chapter shall be expended only for the purposes established herein. (GAAS 11'20'720)' 19.80.130 Apportionment of sewer assessment. Apportionment of the sewer assessment is based upon the general and direct benefits received by any property as measured by its total area within a local improvement district, not upon the nature of the particular terrain or the value or use of specific property, provided, however, that any property within the improvement district, which in the judgment of the municipality cannot be economically served because of terrain or other factors, will not be served and will � / � / • not be assessed. Thus, subject to possible equalization for other reasons, all property within the local improvement district will be uniformly assessed without regard to value, use or terrain provided it can, in the best judgment of the municipality be served, or is, in fact, served. (GAAB 11,20.130)' 19'80.140 Assessment of public lands conveyed to private ownership. When formerly unassessable public lands not assessed by reason of previous ordinances are conveyed to private ownership, such tract or parcel of land shall be levied against on a square-foot basis in an amount equivalent to the trunk and lateral sewer assessments in accordance with the provisions of this chapter_ This shall be in addition to the contract fee for installing the service connection at the time of application for such connection. (GAAB 11.20.140). 19.80.150 Public installations. Public installations requesting sewer service shall be charged a fee, in lieu of assessment, equivalent to the lateral and trunk assessments provided herein, together with the contract fee for installing the service connection. (GAAB 11.20'160). 19,80^160 Plans and estimated costs. Plans for the work, the estimates of the costs thereof, and the plat of the improvement district herein described showing thereon the boundaries of the improvement district, with the various lots, tracts, and parcels of land and the estimated cost of the improvements that shall be assessed against each such lot, tract or parcel within the improvement district are on file in the office of the director of public works and are open for inspection by anyone desiring to inspect the same. (GAAB 11.20.160l. 19.80.170 Construction of improvements. The improvements to be funded by this improvement district will be constructed in accordance with the specifications of the municipality by a contractor selected and reimbursed by the municipality. (GAAB 11.20.170). 19.80,180 Publication, objection end commencam�nt of work' The ordinance after passage shall be published at least once a week for two consecutive weeks in one of the newspapers published within the municipality and such publication is hereby designated as public notice to all persons concerned of the nature, extent and approximate cost of the improvements, and the boundary of the district to which the cost of the improvement will be assessed. Further notice is hereby given to all persons and part/es concerned that any person owning property affected by the improvement district as herein established shall have 60 days from the first publication hereof in which to file his objection to the work proposed to be 'performed within the improvement district. Five days or more after the termination of the GO-day period from and after the first publication of this notice, the work proposed to be performed in the improvement district will commence unless objection be filed either severally or by petition of the owners of the property bearing 60% or more of the estimated costs of the improvement in the improvement district. (GAAB 11.20'180)' l9-4U .�~ • 0:: • 4•?.'. T • r: I .1 1 s % .:: • 1 1 1 -, i I \ T, , \ ■ , A ■ 10.7. •1 / • • t. Ite 110 i I • I ji ; NOTES: I. P.R. LOCATIONS DIMENSIONS 0, 5.0W1 , 1 STAIRS, RAMPS ANO RETAINING WALL* REFER TO ARCNI TECTURAL LEGEND FINISH GRADES SLOTTED DRAIN STORM ORAIN STORM DRAIN 14,74. ouRa 4 GUTTER SIDEWALK 1 • \ . \ • SANITARY savveR 5S SANITARY SEWER tt. 0 CULVERT PIPE. ELECTRIC LINE —a— 'TELEPHONE LINE POWER POLE STREET LI(.71-IT WATER. NENVICE 5.5. SERVICE THRUST SOCK =i4/tcoih,..,soosta,ad. x kg,:37.5 • R Si. .1k / / .4.4--- . , / i / '7,1* ....41 1 / 'ill 1 PO,OLSO WA—SE ORIGI,LAL CONTOUR LIN55 wctooy WAY 5.44° 43'57r ,oz - WOODY WAY ISTA•5+102S, NORTH P,..1.1/441 Sr... 0.00 \ \ I , , 1 , ‘• i \• . , . , . ,....„ „ , ......_:„..... . . \„. •B IIM . . A4 ..*:, .x.. A:, ,.;“'■...,' IZ " ",. \ :•• :.,. 7. ra•4,•' T•• 1.,..•••••,' ,.., 1.21 c'..•• t •• ••...1 • ••••114-,: M:.-r. r',1i4..1 0..,Irl•A ,..It.• ir,..r.,.: !.....i..,..., I, •,,..fr.. 1". .0.,5.4.:• • ,i,D.CZ.. .r.. : :) IV • ..c.. ‘ • / i / . -. • •/` , -7 / : . NOTES. 1. FOR LOCATIONS DIMENSIONS OR GloawA sTAIRS, RAMPS AND RETAINING WALLY REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL Ea-mers. ••••• • -• •• ••-- • — LEGEND, EXISTING PROI.og, WATER FIRE HYDRANT WATER MAIN SANITARY SEWER —SS--- SANITARy G0WEI M. 0 • ..... OWNER,. °-SCTR,, TELER _ 9°N. LINE ROws, OL STREET ww.47. WATER SERVICE 0. S. SERVICE PENcE RIGHT-OP-WAY SURVEY MONUMENT DRAINAGE GRAVEL ROADWAY r. z zz:rz- PAvE,,,,,Enir Viaatfali CURS # STORM DRAIN SToRm 4IN M.H. DRAIN CONTOUR LINES —La-- FINISH GRADES STA 0.60.• • WOODY WAY .54 43.''Sri. • RX5,7P41=0112gtre • IDCIak Mad ilaw4 1.perobed RECRIVIID 4IAR .1 WAVILIMagail ••• . \ 1 1 .3/74Pa_ ;-• a.1.4.6■//5- 7611: los ar.weete/.2,- • KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH MEMORANDUM DATE: March 11, 1982 TO: Philip C. Shealy, Borough Manager FROM: David C. Crowe, Borough Engineer SUBJECT: Woody Circle Estimated Construction Costs The following is my estimate of what it would cost to design and construct the portion of Woody Circle which will not be constructed by Kodiak Island Housing Authority: Unclassified Excavation Rockf!ll Basedourse Clearing and Grubbing 2100 c.y. @ $16.50 3008 ton @ $23.08 360 ton @ $27.50 Engineering, Design, and Administration Total $ 34'65[Y 69,000 9,900 2,000 $ll5'55O 10,000 $l25'550 If Kodiak Island Housing Authority were to pay 73 percent of the costs, as mentioned b, Marlin Knight during our meeting on Monday afternoon, their share would be $91,651.50. If the method of determining assessments which is used by the City of Kodiak is used, the Housing Authority's share would be $81'609.' or 65 percent of the total cost. This was determined by the following calculations: Frontage Area 40% $ 50'220 KIHA 473 L.F.. 76.54% $38'437 Lutheran Church 145 L.F., 23.46$ 11'783 618 L.F. $50,220 60% $ 75.330 KIHA 170'592 s.f.' 57.31% $43'172 Lutheran Ch. 127'067 s.f. 42'69% 32'158 297'659 s.[. $75,]]0 .^� s• � KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ^.. - . . ` .� MEMORANDUM Woody Circle Estimated Construction Costs March 11, 1982 - Page 2 These costs are predicated on the Housing Authority's installing two additional culverts which would ultimately need to be installed under asphalt paving. — 2 2/ -7.f(.7 /roc207 Sze/ Es 6 a 60/ 0 / -- - -- -- -- - - --- - - - - -- 99-f 0 o4" 02/ -z7/ T.Zz/ 177/ g'z 2 7 bs 76// az/ -2 2/ 321 -g2 ( - 2/ lc? Es rz :Ft5/fr Q 8/1 oz/ •2/ , T2Z/ c2 -27 Z•/-, cl 2 / -2z/ QS e -z z -c Q b 02/ zz/ - 2Z/ -22/ _6 2-4/? .27017 zi Q -6-z oc 7z// oz/ v2/ zz/ z 22/ 2Z/ -fr L 62 0 Z/ 02/ - 9Z/ 72/ zz/ 227 Og" 02/ /,oz/ OF ZZ/ 2/ 5 0/ 61/ z-6// 02/ 721 722/ /,? 2/ vi/ ,L// / 0 0/ 3,4/1 ..s7 oc / 0 £/ az /// 7/1 -2 71/ -2// g/ BO/ 01/ 7E 7 6 o / 60/ Q. 0 L/ oc /79 // -zoil • - 0 // a • 1 Peo/ 60/ 71.4(2/ 1,o-9 Q.Ay 19"C? *** *** PP *e' **I *** ,c• 0;21 J-39°21 "Dr2.,c1"7 pao - z2 - 0 ;22/ 7,9z/ loz/ -E_ort '4-2Z- -0Z/ /-)E- o z.02 - //4 n'z- -2, 61/ ;6/ -i6// e2/ .zz7/ OZ/ - 42 - 0/17 0 /e -0 OS 2 Tv/ 8// 761/ ig// 9// 22/ zz ,32 6/ / z5 -FL 3-92 0 9g - 8'7 8/1 // -/z/ • -z 22- e zez• c/ - zez- 6/4 F -E.:- la 7, ,f/ Tv/ az/ $02/ 3.9z1 781/ /7-. (7 76/. /2 27 0 poi •71/ -;7// 3,- // --e1/ 797/ 7, 07/ 73/ - a 73/. /Z 2/ 9(7/ -o_sof 5,o/ 69/ /z- (-) 77-zh, 0 /7- 27- o /Z cl - 14 73- "i" / _90/ 79 9/ s 0/ 760/ 3 6 / 7 go/ ;'Q/ boi 0 28 + **• **It T ,( A *** *** 1.7.111.c. v 0/".0)).e9,X,q (7 X120007 7 G22 -IL a - 2Z- 5 (2 bGZ/ VOZ/ -ZZ ?-ZZ/ 322/ 8 :s- /7 :FL 9E- - 62 - c2 -72/ -6- 6// E.6// 02/ 22/ -ZZ/ 7;2.2/ / 2-1- 0 (217 22 5 0E— QS' 22/ --i_81/ // oz 22/ -2z/ z22/ 722/ 0 hg- -2.sso 72z/ -c7ii/ a-8// / OZ/ 7/2/ 2Z/ z Zz/ —27/ 2E — 7/ 0 /2 7 s'z -Q/ II 02/ 10Z/ -22/ 7,271 -T8Z— / 2-2Z 5 0 2 — IV 1/ -a 22/ _F 92/ z // _L/ 0 v oz/ 22/ --i-ZZ/ ;82- 36/ - _72 z 2/ — /.- -cz -72/ 6-Sil -9// -s// 3'4 // a 2-6/i oz/ -zaz/ 22/ -22/ T 80=-- / 7i// 0 3.5/ s 0 — &2 — // 7c1/ z1/ /1 & oo E e' 7-‘7- 76/- C/ 0 g/ 74Z- 6 so67-i-- -Fsw 7P// 70// e 2 /1 3/7/' /1 71Z- 9 - • ,6/— 0 —,61 --CZ —8/ 0 2/- 74Z 0.__S‘ -t4 9 b 2// -L9/ ;Lg./ o/ -/// 7// -2// 2// — 2// ;#74z 3 61 -2.-172 2/ -3. 0/ / v/ 9/ 3 5-0/ 0// ‘,// --o// -- 0 So/ -5 59/ / —170/ - 0/ 0/ / _ - 0/ / - 0 -56/ -7-92 0 0 96 6 0 / 7/2 9/ 3/7 62/ 38 Q/ 76,0/ 6,0/ C)7 2 72 E Lb/ 4/ ,/' E / __P9 c2 0(2 2 "2 Z E z z .p.se 4ti/A51,49' ,002 0.5fl, * * * * *A document in the file did not scan***" • It is an approximately 24" x 72" drawing on orange Engineering graph paper. • It appears to be a road grade determination and /or quantity take offs for a road or parcel maybe to Beaver Lake Estate ******** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** N.qhitpdt QUS O.AVT'HO! .Contractor Bonding Co,. SIGNATUti s PROJECT-:DATA.; :; Ar'choot; . $tniciurotEng1ooera 0Et0$4$ @As! Meoha reiIEleob cel..'Erigioeeta limiPi$'0091 .> '. • koPix : N U A . _ zt w ..., to � ;�. ... _ ... r r ; 4. ?".., :ai;•. �,J,';�.yMt`}':F',�':'a�, t + t 't ^ }F'S'' � s: r; �SfyKr � �J i.. +',a< _ �r„ ,:i;' ... br . ,xt:: • /I - 'Tfx ' i 1:14,..,113:9!).../ ,u..3'�I:.. i- J.d 4k» �JJJ Jrt ti ,0 (: -dYya4 • 4 ) Wye! LY NOILV, l*::L'14-.`4' 4Q Ii F.iNaumInL'0 -d .ado.7 -. L3 514 A. ?AVM NaIL'OFNrN -_- //A c d451+ -31.., -M .x3- 8Hl- i+..f/- 00 jQaLSr/ren 0a.,t _ vAttl@'. • T�TE�4N /ca� M ii -G PPS ; ;YY% it +..1H• ''•CALTNG PAVF.Me.AT, °?.SEMeNTS. ITHHntF+ Iµ„ OCtGINAL -�} PATH.NT'� T pL 4 Mignin'ESIMEMIN- IMINEINEMIUMMEROMMEN INEMEMENINEURIMENE MIERIZEINEURPRIMEMENUMBECRIMEMILICERE inunrammum mummumuninnammummummx 11111111111111111111111111111111110111111111EM ENE NEEMEMINIENIENIMENI EMENIMMINEEN MENERMEINIMIUMESIESEMENOMMIREAM " "OE 1:ms e x„0 grao• as Pa is ao, L.2C1 ., '.. vroo., �'....•:rawa �4.41i!v!ii?ri ;,w a,;a•• • , .. • • ....... • —,g.1:17.isleAkcirtM.4.W4„ • Nligr.I.A0e#44'5153.V••::::••,:,;-.'•V•c;?:•:•:"...;.'it.-. ..... . 4... .." .kk:SittIV91 : ;40 • . . . , . • • *.,..... :' , ...‘. .1, ::'...- .', " - • - 4 . ,.. ••,!' Sti.;',4 - 41....,,,Au. , 14t• ...• ,....4 . 44,1,1 „i:;.::::..41,4 , .,.., - ,',.4..,;,-.A.:qt;''. • —,g.1:17.isleAkcirtM.4.W4„ • Nligr.I.A0e#44'5153.V••::::••,:,;-.'•V•c;?:•:•:"...;.'it.-. ..... . 4... .." .kk:SittIV91 : ;40 .a'�ycYa�"TT VAFt,Fi', per, m_ExR• • • /.., • —' E ?:tcIG}em . • F'j- Y�PL1G.�d�,Tj' .+,,�•tJ_.°+i'_J"� 22401:. ' :CeF. leLr ..1:. . • yur ID • r'��11 -3�tT G7�•Y�TJf�LI,- 645. • .1,T+E:�J;'=:.t�- ^•r'gt.'4 F' °�y{.•., • Ii • • Aqg e.•N6* • • ..cY 7r vt' . s il n+' i.45'nti".Ln 12 r., rt ` ., AInCYI . YY,?..,4,4r ieNii.et"`, ..cY 7r vt' . fl ee 4450; 1276 ■ 4 • . '_Oti4�ITUDINPL ■ 1 .AL ' ILIi • • PRL- PXJh',': ,:4M :F.Ci CJEf.TF19 •P.YJFl.� -P 7119.. : ..* frin-7-- garc4941rr. . .,,•,.•' EEO' I. .. . . • • . • , . . • . . • , . . .• . • , ••,. ••••• • . • • • • • • i-,'70-45','"7".r :4•-•17 qt•-'■'7*.1?:7,14-1 • , . • . . ..• • -;" ; jP"'S' • • • • • ". • •.• ' • , • • , . . ' •-• . P‘„ • • • 1 . •. , • .• • • • • ' i••••-•\ • i • -1LC•1' , . -11.G "Al•iL pin 7 ir1 1.4.0 • ; *1 * • it, 1 • i4 • '6 • I • • r • .• ' 0-11 • . 40, • • . • • ' . • • . • 0 " .0- • • • .4..".)••• . . fel • • • r_47, • • • • • • • • • . , • ., • • 'I. 7 *P:' 1° • • ...--Ve57,0 • ..'• I • • • • • • • • ; ^ (.2) .. • 'R P- . (Q) I • •-. • • • • - :••••• • •• T�GCJsVI? f� • . .• • .1. • • • ••• "' • . ','•••••:,._,:Lui • -.t-.t:•T ' ''''' •7'.'"•••••• • • ••• • I; i;nr • . • . .• . . .: ' . ' : '-': .... , ..i.•;'..' :,•2:•,,E.,:..„.., : . .,.• ' ',.. . . .„ -,t1157.'.1°C1N1,011::-Dii:';E' • . • ••• ..• . • ..• I i''....-,.. ....... :17 . . ... :-... s..„ ..'. ; • . , (C,`, .4 ' •-• 57,PL.: sk*.. _ . 14:11:02iiagiak4g*taNA Kodiak Island Borough Kodiak, Alaska ECEIVE- sate '.of `. Alaska EPARTMENT OF LABOR .- 'MECHANICAL.,INSPETI01 301 : Eagle Street .'Poueh' '7- 0201'= nchorage,,Alaska 99510 (907)`.264 -2447 26 umber °of :, ~. El ect:, Plum in R. Elect.. R'..Plumb. ,.. " =..1> ..,. Learner .js: 1 1 ' L R1 . �R., i °aPp 'i ab a ;: • ;CODE•REFtRENCE : 4 4-- -c-t 'l •V•? -~47.144 t'.f4 ABATEMENT 'DATE C;GI '. At.., "'%;. r •Y. • 10� • :•:• •F ! R+ lR jDDR SS: :. -- •l✓ •; ti 'J iJr - •inj L/ '+..i •. r - .,> ji'•' t'C C—K' . , 4 . rr. y �' :�C ITY� i I,' R Y�: �:C6NT A TOR��CIT STATE Z I-P: • o f i C ns uet aria r —*YE -t i s 1. c c e r �:P urn l bi rt g -,Undergr,oun `4 4 New .Temporary Rough ', t , 'Final `. Gas ..,_£r.F� } fi,,,,Ft,� . u.f d ,..• _ . J Al.teration .Service ' - , Residential : ' '' •Rough - Final :, r « -*+r*- Commercial [ � ' ■ � i ',.. i ),.rl, `. x. ;.. tS� f •+}'�•'n Other4. umber °of :, ~. El ect:, Plum in R. Elect.. R'..Plumb. ,.. " =..1> ..,. Learner ;CODE•REFtRENCE : :VIOLATIONS: A ABATEMENT 'DATE �� : :' . .. L , ,.- • l i e.:4 -- " (if: /�"'^.%� ..i L: '(., "' G-/.1„ wi ;h '{�# [I, •. '• • '`.•" Jrv.Y PERSON REQUESTING "'INSPECTION : (i f:; app1;i'cabl e' ,a'ska;:`law'.requires .that "satisfactory arrangements be made to 'correct the above violations) before the applic- able abatement date(s). 1;�4d tzj .3�scv tad �._iyX t75 y ?if;.> 'Y'4 n�7:aiJ GNATURE F. N PECTOR 76053R9/81: KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH Telephones 486-5736 - 486-5737 — Box 1246 KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 March 24, 1983 Design Lab, Inc. 625 West Fifth Avenue Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Gentlemen: RE: KUD|AK ISLAND HOUSING AUTHORITY HOUSING PROJECT The apartment project in Kodiak is about to wind down, and | would like to have answers concerning two problems: 1. Foundation ventilation: UBC 1979 2517/6\ states: /'Under-floor areas shall be ventilated by an approved mechanical means or by openings in exterior foundation walls. Such openings shall have a net area of not less than 11 square feet for each 25 linear feet of exterior wall. Openings shall be located as close to corners as practicable and shall provide cross ventilation on at least two approximately opposite sides. They shall be covered with corrosion-resistant wire mesh not less than 4 inch nor more than 1 inch in any dimension'/' Ted Wilke told me that you have been working on the ventilation problem. | would like to receive your proposals on this matter. How are you going to eliminate the standing water in the crawl spaces? 2. UBC 1979 3205/c\ states: "Where eave or cornice vents are used to provide the ventilation of combustible attic spaces, vent openings shall not be located within 3 feet measured laterally above window or door openings in the wall of the story immediately below'// | am concerned about the soffit vents over windows. | am looking forward to receiving your proposals as to how you are going to correct the existing deficiencies. You will not receive a certificate of occupancy until Section 3205/c\ has been complied with. Sincerely, � � Bryce W. Gordon Building Official S L ,J h L J u 12 -L11 LH IFQ MK& DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY Mr. Dan L. Burton Project Captain Design Lab Inc. 625 West Fifth Avenue Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Dear Mr. Burton, BILL SHEFFIELD, GOVERNOR 'Pouch 6313 PMINMXKMDEWMMX DIVISION OF FIRE PREVENTION / ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99502 January 17, 1983 subject: Kodiak Low Income Public Housing Area Separation Walls This letter will serve to confirm our phone conversation of January 17, 1983, in regards to the above subject. Although it is common to accept solid 2X blocking in lieu of gypsum board at between floor spaces of two -hour area separation walls, it would not be acceptable to do the same with TJI floor joists. TJI's are acceptable as fire- stopping, per UBC section 2517(f), but they would not have two -hours of structural fire resistance. As shown on attached sketch "A ", correction must be made between floor spaces, and at the top of crawl spaces, with two layers of 5/8" type "X" gypsum board on each side of the TJI clusters.' If this office can of further assistance, please feel free to contact us at the above address, or call at 338 -7673. Sincerely Gary R. Crouse, Director State Fire Marshal by Dave Taylor Fire Protection Engineer cc- Director - City Mr. Brice Gordon, Building Official L 4`� City of Kodiak Andre Schalk, Supervisor, Southcentral District, DFM III 11.77 • • • • • /t/ Z.z.1 .„t App O'F GAir T-(PS 11X 1Q 13cT1 A. s,\pss. c7p- TJI 17 August 1982 11/ RECEIVED Alf:317 DIRECTOR'S OFFICE DIVISION OF FIRE PREVENTION ANCHORAGE, ALASKA Mr. Dave Taylor Fire Prevention Engineer Dept. of Public Safety Division of Fire Prevention Pouch 6313 Anchorage, Alaska 99502 Reference: Kodiak Island Low Income Public Housing Kodiak Island Housing Authority Building A, 7 plex, 82-D-095A Building B, 8 plex, 82-D-095B Building C, 9 plex, 82-D-095C Building D, 8 plex, 82-D-095D Building E, 8 plex, 82-D-095E Building F, 8 plex, 82-D-095F Building G, Community Center, 82-D-095G Dear Mr. Taylor: As agreed at our meeting, the following corrections will be implemented into the Construction Documents: 1. All two hour walls will extend from the of concrete footing to the underside of roof deck. Arheta.M.Mtkag=dgdrE6E-E5Fg, eWir43-6IF:d; ollia"7-441:tlin-Y3T—ctuls.17 All doors through this wall will be 1½ fire rat and assemblies. 2. Fire extinguishers will be provided as required in uniform fire code Section 10-1. All oil-fired furnaces and water heaters will have 6" metal pans around entire unit. 4. All boiler rooms have double sheet rock ceilings to achieve a one hour rating. 5. The boiler rooms of buildings D, E, F G, will have doors that swing out from these rooms. 6. Alarms: As per 13 AAC 50.030, a 110 bolt single station smoke detector has been provided in each dwelling unit. In design lab inc 625 W 5th Ave Anchorage AK 99501 907/276 5254 Page 2 buildings D, E & F, supervised smoke detectors have been provided in each common hall area. 7. The foam plastic in detail 5/A19 will be covered on top with quarter inch plywood. 8. The ceiling of the shop room in Building G will have 2 , layers of sheet rock as per UBC Section 901. A fire extdn g*Ueh will be in this area. The owner has been advised tha any dust producing wood tools must be provided with collec- tion systems per uniform fire code, Article 76. 9. Attic access has been provided in Building G at janitors closet. , Thank you for your cooperation. Si itc e.e Hernan Amaya Project Manage • g-z/ - _Fr? January 10, 1983 moun tain pacific company A WASHINGTON CORPORATION Kodiak Island Borough Building Department 700 Upper Mill Bay Road Kodiak, AK 99615 Attention: Brice Gordon Dear Sir: Re: K.I.H.A. Low-Income Public Housing In response to your concern about the adequacy of the firewall draftstops for the K.I.H.A. low-income public housing project, we informed the Architect (Design Lab, Inc.) who, in turn, met with a,Ztate Fire Marshall representative to review the plans with respect to y ur concerns. Enclosed is a copy of a letter from Design Lab, Inc., to Mr. Dave Taylor of the Department of Safety, which confirms the affirmative Opinion wFTCh Mr. Taylor gave,, regarding the adequacy of the draftstops. We hope that this will satisfy your concerns. If not, please let us know immediately. Resolution of this issue is critical to our maintenance of the project completion schedule. Very truly yours, MOUNTAIN PACIFIC COMPANY Ed Mathisen Project Administrator cjb cc: Hernan Amaya Ted Wilke Enclosure Kodiak Island Bor - Kodiak Alask°411 RECErT, V -E JAN 14 igt(8 1617 South Jackson Street © Seattle, Washington 98144 o Telephone (206) 329-5656 15 December 1982 Mr. Dave Taylor Department of Public Safety Pouch 6313, Anchorage, Alaska 99502 Reference: Kodiak Low Income Public Housing Suhject: Area Separation Walls Dear Dave: This is to confirm our discussion of 14 December 1982 which took place in your office and our subsequent telephone conversation the same morning. It is my understanding that upon examining the plans for the construction of 48 units of low income apartments, it is your opinion that the plans fully comply with all requirements of the Uniform Building Code with particular reference made to Chapter .25, Section 2517 (f), Draftstops as applicable to area separation walls shown Section 2, Sheet A18 and Section 19, Sheet A20; Sincere D -an L. - Burton -- Project Job Captain Dr, /11b cc: Marlin Knight, KIHA Ted Wilke, MPC Ray Parker,'DLI - "design lab inG • 625 W 5 th Ave Anchorage AK 99501E • 907/276 5254 4 4-1 icc'aqok koril; mod son„, E fic,s(,c, 9 UPC INTERPRETATIONS • ,,E.1 w CHAPTER 4 ? lot fl-IY 94, . 4 4 SUBJECT - Sizing of Clotheswasher Standpipe Based on,1967 UPC Question: What is the fixture unit equivalent for a single family dwelling clotheswasher trap and standpipe? Claims are being made that a 2" trap and standpipe is in excess of code requirements for a single family occupancy. Answer: Increasing complaints by owners, contractors and inspectors of overflowing 1-1/2" clotheswasher stand- pipes, due to faster discharges, unpredictable sudsing - potentials, sluggish drains, and so forth,-Iedto th present 2" trap and standpipe requirement, which was adopted at the 1966 annual meeting. This requirement does not preclude discharging a clotheswasher "over- the-rim" into a laundry tub which provides holding space to equalize temporary excess flows. Section 402 is not intended to apply to the fixture unit loading values or equivalents of fixtures listed and rated in Table 4.1, but to establish drain sizes for fixtures and waste discharging devices not covered by Table 4.1, or having higher discharge rates than the minimums cited in that table. The footnote in Section 402, "exception on self-service laundries" was intended to call attention to Table 4-1 and its footnote.pointing out that, while ,groups of 3 or more clotheswashers'discharging to a common drain should be rated at 6 units each for the purpose' of adequately sizing the common drain, individual appliances in such groups could still be rated at 2 units-each and may there- fore discharge through a 2" trap up to the 4,unit loading permitted by the maximum trap loading table in-7Section 402-. Based on 1967 UPC SUBJECT. Clotheswasher Drain Sizing for Groupings Question: Provisions under Table 4-1, Uniform Plumbing Code state: Clothes washers in Groups of 3 or more shall be rated at 6 units each for the purpose of common waste pipe sizing. 1. Does the 6-unit loading refer to each group of clothes washers or to each clothes washer? 2. What is the definition of group? 3. What is the definition of common waste pipe? ' 4-2 Refer to drawing A, Fig. 1, page 4-4. 4. Assuming that 3 clotheswashers are dis- charged into each standpipe, what are the unit loadings and required sizes for pipe sections "a", "b", "c", "d" and "e"? 5. Assuming that 2 clotheswashers are discharged into each standpipe, what are the unit loadings and required sizes for pipe sections "a",,"b", "c", "d" and "e"? 6. Assuming that one clotheswasher is discharged into each standpipe, what are the unit loadings and required sizes for pipe sections "a", "b", "c", "d" and "e"? Refer to Fig. 2, page 4-4, and assume the standpipes are served by two horizontal drainage branches in the same room and that only one clothes washer is discharged into each standpipe. • 7. Is this arrangement classed as a "group of 3 or more" clotheswashers served by a common waste pipe? 8. What are the unit loadings and required sizes for pipe sections "f", "g" and "h"? Refer to Fig. 3, page 4-4, and assume that only one clothes- washer is discharged into each standpipe. 9. Same as question 7. 10. What are the unit loadings, and required sizes for pipe sections "j", "k", "m" and "n"? Answer: 1. The six unit loading factor applies only to a common drain serving a group of three or more domestic type clotheswashing machines. 2. The word, "group" follows its established dictionary meaning and applies to batteries or aggregations of three or more such appliances, available for public or semi-public use in occupancies such as laundromats or apartment building service rooms, and so located that simultaneous discharge to a common drain can be anticipated. 3. .The "common waste pipe", in this instance, means any drain into which the wastes from three or more such grouped appliances are discharged. (See definition of "common") Because pumped discharges of up to 20 G.P.M. per machine are involved, and simultaneous flow potential must be recognized in multiple installations, the capacity of collector drains must be predicated on anticipated peak flows. ,The UPC 6 unit pressly to cope 4. 4 -3 battery loading facto was developed ex- with such commercial type installations. "b " "c" "d" "e" - 36 fixture units and a4" drain - 72 fixture units and a. 4" drain - 108 fixture units and a 4" drain - 144 fixture units and a 47. drain - 36. fixture ,units:.and a 3 "t; drain. :_ 5. "a" - 24 . fixture units and a `3 "' drain "b" - 48 fixture units and a 4" -drain "c" - 72 fixture units and a 4" drain "d" - 96 fixture units and a 4" drain "e" - 24 fixture units and a 2 -1/2" drain 6. "a" - 4 fixture .units and-a-2" drain "b" - 24 fixture units and a 3" drain "c" - 36 fixture units and a 4" drain "d" - .48 fixture units and a 4" drain "e ", - 4 fixture 'units; and 'a 2" drain 7. 8. 9. Yes. - 4 fixture units and-a. ' drain - 4 fixture units and.a 2" drain - 24 fixture units and .a 3'" drain 10. "j" - 2 fixture units and a 2" drain "k" - . 4. fixture units 'and °a 2" drain "m" - 18 fixture units and a 3" drain "n" - 24 fixture units and a 3" drain However, since these are not .specific 6 -unit fixtures, footnotes 3 and 4 of Table 4 -3 do not apply. For drawings see next page. 4 -4 .Y:PICA.L 46ri p1 pee TO taraftct&IVE. i=L2114es WAIN-Ian Dl "•SCI -iAmq i� nu 8 1 1 1 1 1 MCI 1 1 _ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 d• Drawing "A" showing group clotheswasher piping layouts discussed on pages 4 -1, 4-2, 4 -3. 0 SUBJECT,'- Clotheswasher Drain Sizing For Groupings Based on 1967`UPC Laundromat drainage piping illustration discussed on pages 4 -6, 4 -70 4 -6 . Question: 1. The accompanying illustration shows ;a. group . of ten clotheswashers. Should each trap be rated at six fixture units and be 3" size? Answer: Assuming each trap is to receive the waste from one machine, then such trap may be 2 ". Question: 2. Each pair of traps is a group . (less ..than; three) and may be -rated at two fixture units each. This ,then would require only 2" traps and a 2" vertical waste ?..:. Answer: True. Question: 3. Such' traps are •rated_ at six fixture un: . each . only for sizing the common horizontal waste pzpe? -Answer:* True, .except delete-..the =word. horizonta Question: 4. The uppermost pair.' "E "'are not common :w the others until they join at "D ", therefore the drain can be 2" to -that point? Answer': True. Question: ` 5.- Only two six unit fixtures may be connec to a 3" horizontal line. Because;: stack "E " carries onl 4 units, the transition from 3" to. 4" occurs- at : "C "? Answer: The rule of two six unit .fixtures:. (water closets on a 3" horizontal drain does not apply here. The ;specie six unit loading prescribed . is for the sole purpose of ... ': providing an adequately sized common drain for multiple': clotheswasher installations The 35 unit loading;permitte on 3" horizontal drainage piping therefore applies. Question: 6. All traps are rated . at , 6 'units, .therefore transition from 3" to 4" occurs at "D "? Answer: No, see answer to No. Question: 7. In any case,'the 'combine and "E" requires a 4" waste.: line? • Answer: True.. Question: 8. Does Section 701 (a) apply or_ .may. two clothes washers discharge into one 3 ",.trap? If the latter; ,does Section 404(b) apply to each pair of traps whereby two traps may receive the discharge from four washers? Answer: A single trap "serving; more than one:'clotheswas mu tsmu Ee equipped with a standpipe Up : to :three washers may discharge into a 3" ,'Standpipe receptor. ' , .Clo washer traps may be installed back- to- back 'as provided .3 Section 404(b). /---g19.— REPJLIT /m(2- State of Alaska DEPARTMENT OF LABOR - MECHANICAL INSPECTION 3301 Eagle Street - Pouch 7-020 Anchorage, Alaska 99510 (907) 264-2447 — (0/ :.*Date InspectedM /7/ 72- B 0 NER CATION*,:: :-:-:- :::::: • XONTRACTOR NAME ( •f appl i cab -7:exi-ite4. 1 , Y74,;1. ' A41-4dAot7 6)Lirti ADDRESS ::Kx .::::'• .:.::::4:::. .:::: - .- *:::*R.CONTRACTOR/IADDRESS:-.M* ---icli i4L CITY:,..::::: -.-...? 0, ...,-:.:.::::;:::::::;:::::::;::::::::::.:*:;:CONTRACTOR .-5-4 CITY : .:.:::::::::::::' :;:i STATE :: :: -122 (// ' 9?7' --9,5g-gz - 7 *-- Construction iii*. • ;:::::Elect ca .% :::Plumbing New Y Temporary Underground. Rough Final Gas . (L-5-64 (i ) Alteration . Service °03 (2) Residential >< Rough Final v P-457-el Commercial ___ Other Number of: J. Elect. R. Elect. J. Plumb. R. Plumb. J. Line._ Learner :CODE REFERENCE :.*:>:N I OL AT IONS g'WUn 'ABATEMENT D ATE M 7 ? ii/pC„ .!_,,Ii/21te-4')..tA 64, „4t, i-olioott_di, / ,, Lirz& .1(644(‘gg6 ,2 ' ' /J ic.44 #6 () if 4,4414agd---zike44ei , e: 4. 3/ Am fie s. ereeew,4,1-e j= a - 4 4 = 4 - ...(24,tiq /7/471- ceige- dosewi 4zza 94d-/-e A- (q) 1 4 ,17 ae,g,l4etilet d,o, (lke4u44 d3-ii „.. L-E-k dlei,i;, (L-5-64 (i ) 7/1.e.k. 14.14-t-il44.6e--0 r. .2 2. ,,44,rel- 2p-ifdd.pc., °03 (2) 4,71 a , 9.70-noao Alri4-L,44 v P-457-el /-R t-714 D _Zieri-e-44_ .1 g ---)./7-5-3-1 :NAME TO WHOM REQUIREMENTS/W RE EXPLAINEDTITLEM, ...: • • ,11/ t: -2- L /07— 1 6n4. Mg NAME OF PERSON REQUEST INSPECT ON f appl icabl Alaska law requires that satisfactory arrangements be made to correct the above violation(s) before the applic- able abatement date(s). SIGNATURE OF INSPECTOR Di rect inquiries 07., 6053 R 9/81 Electrical and plumbing iections are conducted under ion 8 of the Alaska Administrative Code and the following Alaska. Statutes: DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Sec. 23.05.060. POWERS OF THE DEPARTMENT. The department may: (1) enforce all state labor laws; (2) act as mediator and appoint deputy commissioners-of conciliation in labor disputes. whenever it considers. the interest. of industrial peace, requires it; (3) make investigations, collect and compile statistical information concerning the conditions of labor generally and upon all matters, relating' to the enforcement of this chapter;, (4) institute court proceedings against' an employer of labor without, cost to the employee when it is. satisfied that the employer has. failed. to pay an employee an amount due by contract; (5) issue orders, rules and regulations: necessary/ to. carr out. the: purposes of this chapter: (6) administer and promulgate regulations, necessary to carry /out AS 18.60.705 -- 18.60.750. (§ 43 -1 =5 ACLA 1949;. 80.5 1 ch. 34' SLA 1949 ;, am §)2' ch 15 SLA 1972) HIGH VOLTAGE LINES Sec. 18.60.670. PROHIBITION, AGAINST PLACEMENT OF' EQUIPMENT NEAR ELECTRICAL POWER LINES ANO CONDUCTORS. No person, individually/or through an agent or employee may (1) place any type of tool., equipment,. machinery, or material' which, Is capable of lateral, vertical or swinging motion„ within 10, feet. of a,high' voltage overhead electrical line or conductor;. (2) store, operate, erect,. maintain„ move or transport tools, machinery, equipment, supplies, .materials,.apparatus, buildings or.'other structures. within 10 feet of a 'high voltage overhead :el'ectrical' line or conductor. (§ 1 ch 83 SLA 1972) Sec 18.60.685. PENALTIES,. (a) A person who violates § §_670- -695 of this chapter is guilty of a misdemeanor,.and'upon conviction Is punishable by a fine of not more than 5500,, or by imprisonment for not more than six months, or by both. PLUMBING CODE Sec. 18.60.725. ENFORCEMENT OF COMPLIANCE. (a) A department inspector snail give written notice to the owner of a constructed premise or the contractor of a premise under construction of each violation of the code. The notice of violation shall accurately describe the violation and give specific reference to the section and paragraph of the code. In addition, the notice shall prescribe the necessary changes so that the work will comply with the code. (b) In case of complaints by a contractor, builder or installer charging, arbitrary actions or incompetence on the part of an inspector. the commissioner, after reviewing written presentation of the dispute, may require reinspection by a new, inspector who has no conectlon with either disputant. (§ 1 ch 15 SLA 1972) Sec. 18.60.730. PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS. A person who violates a provision of the code, and who, after receiving the notification required by § 725 of this chapter, refuses to correct the violation, after proof of the violation, 1s subject to a fine of not more than 51,000. (§ 1 ch 15 SLA 1972) ELECTRICAL ADMINISTRATORS Sec. 08.40.175. CEASE AND DESIST ORDER. (a) If the commissioner of labor determines that a person is acting as an electrical administrator in violation of this chapter, he may issue a cease and desist order prohibiting further action by the person as an electrical administrator. The cease and desist order remains in effect until the person has submitted evidence acceptable to the commissioner of labor showing that the violation has been corrected. (b) A person affected by an order issued under (a) of this section may seek equitable relief preventing the commissioner of labor from enforcing the order. (§ 1 ch 39 SLA 1972; am § 9 ch 53 SLA 1977) Sec 08.40.178. INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. The commissioner of labor may seek an injunction In the superior court to enjoin a person from violating this chapter. (§ 1 ch 39 SLA 1972) Sec 08,40,180, VIOLATION OF CHAPTER. A person who knowingly violates this chapter, or who knowingly violates a valid rule, regulation or order of the board, is guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction is punish- able by a fine of not more than 5300, or by imprisonment for not more than 60 days or by both. (§ 10 ch 158 SLA 1960) ELECTRICAL SAFETY Sec. 18.60.630. ENFORCEMENT OF COMPLIANCE. An authorized inspector under this chapter shall give written notice to the owner of constructed premises, or the contractor of premises under construction, of each violation of applicable electrical standards discovered as a result of his inspection. If within 15 days after receipt of written notice of an electrical violation, the person notified does not rectify the condition, the inspector shall notify the electric utility firm, public utility district, rural electrification•assoclation or municipality district supplying power.to the premises. Upon notice in writing from the inspector, the supplier of electrical power may discontinue services to the premises where the alleged violation exists. (§ 1 ch 89 SLA 1969) Sec. 18;60.640. SCOPE OF WORK COVERED. (a) Sections 580 - -660 of this chapter cover only new installations and alterations to existing instal- lations: (b) These standards are the recommended minimum standards for all new structures in the state. (§ 1 ch 89 SLA 1969) Sec. 18.60.650. PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS. A person who installs electrical wiring not in compliance with minimum electrical standards as set out in 5.580 of this chapter, and who fails to correct this wiring after having,been notified in writing by an authorized inspector, upon conviction,is.punishable by a fine of not more than 51,000. (§ 1 ch 89 5LA,1969) CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS Sec, 08.18.121. SUSPENSION AND REVOCATION OF REGISTRATION. (a) if the insurance required in § 101 of this chapter ceases to be in effect, the,registration,of the contractor shall be suspended until the insurance has, been reinstated. (f); If the commissioner of labor determines that a person is acting as m contractor, to violation of this chapter, he shall give written notice prohibiting, further action by the person as a contractor. The prohibition continues, until' the person has submitted evidence acceptable to the commissioner of labor showing that the violation has been corrected. (g) A person affected by an order issued under this chapter may seek equitable relief preventing the commissioner of labor from enforcing the order„ ( §, 2 ch 100, SLA 1968;, am, § 1 ch 37 SLA 1971) Sec. 08.18.131. INJUNCTION, In an action instituted in the superior court by the commissioner of labor or his representative, a person acting in the capacity of a contractor in violation of_this chapter may be enjoined from doing so. (§ 2 ch 100 SLA 1968; am § 2 ch 37 SLA 1971) Sec. 08'.18.141. MISDEMEANOR. A person acting in the capacity of a contractor in violation of this chapter is guilty of a misdemeanor. (§ 2 ch 100 SLA 1968) CERTIFICATE OF FITNESS Sec. 18.62.070, PERSONS REQUIRED TO OBTAIN CERTIFICATE. A person engaged in one of the following trades shall first obtain from the department the appropriate certificate of fitness in that trade: (1) electrical wiring subject to the standards established in AS 18.60.580; and (2) plumbing subject to the uniform plumbing code, as established in AS 18.60.705. (§ 1 ch 12 SLA 1974)) Sec. 18.62.080. PENALTY. A person, either an employer or' employee, who violates a provision of this chapter or of a regulation issued under this chapter is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, is punishable by a fine of not more than 5500. ( §,1 ch 12 SLA 1974). Copies of applicable statutes and regulations may be obtained by contacting the Mechanical Inspection Section. INoPECTION REPbIT JQ State of Alaska DEPARTMENT OF LABOR - MECHANICAL INSPECTION 3301 Eagle Street - Pouch 7-020 Anchorage, Alaska 99510 (907) 264-2447 Inspected.: OgJOB/OWNER LOCATION :::::-:- *:MCONTRACTOR NAME ( i f' applitable • *:::::::*: 27' :ABA EMENT DATE ADDRESS* ••••:.•:- :::::::-- •:.: • iiiii:i: • *CONTRACTOR ADDRESS:: • • • ,ir/9 •&...i )/dA-64 CITY . :-,::, ::::::::: :•:*:*CONTRACTOR CITY ::::STATE , i ' .i;•eljr-,-; /71 -745-.2-6- : ZIP n*. .jeettOi ' 4/ -7Cr 2deZ74.e:-, - J Consttuction* •:•*-Elect ica :*Plumbing New y Temporary Underground Rough Final - Gas. 4049( r67.44: AK -02,--:Po (Y-e-it ' , . .54V lA . Alteration Service .Y. Residential;‹ Rough . ' aetA-47,42-d,Ce .0.1.7 • .k / - Final Commercial 617dee7 /37 el Yll ' Other Number of: J. Elect. R. Elect. J. Plum . R. Plumb. J. Line. Learner ODE REFEREN Eii*:::MOMAD/IOLATIONSMM:MON*M :::*:* :ABA EMENT DATE _anZ74ztl.4.., , i ' .i;•eljr-,-; /71 -745-.2-6- - -7Cr 2deZ74.e:-, - J - 714r 74-4441,*-e,1W-1-1/J.0 et7ailizettitt vit Ale=7--A /4 1/2451`,1 vi -4 xke-'"1,01&-de-a 44 4 , — ' aetA-47,42-d,Ce .0.1.7 • .k / . “ L. (412/1_ Ely,e,ST-14 ,heed114464a, de-Y gzfle o4t • 4)- ,. / 1 ' 4' '1' f '77' V 4 ..X .*:::.**NAME TO WHOM REQUIREMENTS WERE EXPLAINED“T 1 TLE*:k**K •••.:.:.:K:;::;:::::;::::::;*;:;:;:;:;:i: :; 744/ 4--7..L Jerr , A- :NAME OF PERSON REQUESTING INSPECT ON if appl ica e Alaska law requires that satisfactory arrangements be made to correct the above violation(s) before the applic- able abatement date(s). k*WV'eR4Le.Onk'N SIGNATURE IF INSPECi R 6,7-e2{ Direct inquiries to 07 6053 R 9/81 Electrical and plumbing lections are conducted under ion 8 of the Alaska Administrative Code andttie following Alaska Statutes: DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Sec. 23.05.060. POWERS OF THE DEPARTMENT. The department may: (1) enforce all state lab "or laws; (2) act as mediator and appoint deputy commissioners of conclllation in labor disputes whenever it considers. the interest of industrial' peace requires it; (3) make investigations, collect and compile statistical information concerning the conditions of labor generally and upon all matters relating to the enforcement of this chapter; (4) institute court proceedings against an employer of labor without cost to the employee when it is satisfied that the employer' has fai =led to pay an employee an amount due by contract; (5) issue orders, rules and regulations necessary to carry out the purposes of this chapter: (6) administer and promulgate regulations necessary to carry out AS 18.'60.705 -- 18.60.750. (§ 43 -1 -5 ACLA 1949; am § 1 ch 34 SLA 1949; am § 2 ch 15 SLA 1972) HIGH VOLTAGE LINES Sec. 18.60.670. PROHIBITION AGAINST PLACEMENT OF EQUIPMENT NEAR ELECTRICAL POWER LINES AND CONDUCTORS. 'No person individually Or through an agent or employee may (1) place any type of tool, equipment,' machinery or material which is capable of lateral, vertical or swinging motion, within 10 feet of a high voltage overhead electrical line or conductor; (2) store, operate, erect, maintain, move or transport tools, machinery, equipment, supplies, materials, apparatus, buildings or other structures within 10 feet of a high voltage overhead electrical line or conductor. (§ 1 ch 83 SLA 1972) Sec 18.60:685. PENALTIES. ''(a) A person who violates §§'670 - -695 of this chapter is guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction is punishable by a fine of not more than $500, or by imprisonment for not more than six months. or by both. PLUMBING C000 Sec. 18.60.725. ENFORCEMENT OF COMPLIANCE. '(a) A department inspector snail give written notice to the owner of a constructed premise or the contractor of a premise under construction of each violation of the code. The notice of violation shall accurately describe the violation and give specific reference to the section and paragraph of the code. In addition, the notice shall prescribe the necessary changes so' that the work will comply with the code. (b) in case of complaints by a contractor, builder or installer Charging arbitrary actions or incompetence on the part Of an inspector. the commissioner, after reviewing written presentation of the dispute, may require reinspection by a new inspector who has • no conectlon with either disputant. (§ 1 ch 15 SLA 1972) Sec. 18.60.730. PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS. A person who violates a provision of the code, and who, after receiving the notification required by § 725 of this chapter, refuses to correct the violation, after proof of the violation, is subject to a fine of not more than $1,000. (§ 1 ch 15 SLA 1972) ELECTRICAL ADMINISTRATORS Sec. 08.40.175. CEASE AND DESIST ORDER. (a) If the commissioner of labor determines that a person is acting as an electrical administrator in violation of this chapter, he may Issue a cease and desist order prohibiting further action by the personas an electrical administrator. The cease and desist order remains In effect until the person has 'Submitted evidence acceptable to the commissioner of labor showing that the violation has been corrected. (b) A person affected by an order issued under (a) of this section may seek equitable relief preventing the commissioner of labor from enforcing the order. '(§ 1 ch 39 SLA 1972; am § 9 ch 53 SLA 1977) Sec 08.40.178. INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. The commissioner of labor may seek an injunction in the superior court to enjoin a person from violating this chapter. (§ 1 ch 39 SLA 1972) Sec 08.40.180. VIOLATION OF CHAPTER. A person who knowingly violates this chapter, or who knowingly violates a valid rule, regulation or Order of the board, is guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon 'conviction is punish- able by a fine of not more than $300, or by imprisonment for not more than 60 days or by both. (§ 10 ch 158 SLA 1960) ELECTRICAL SAFETY Sec. 18.60.630. ENFORCEMENT. OF COMPLIANCE. An authorized inspector under this chapter shall give written notice to the owner of constructed premises, or the contractor of premises under construction, of each violation of applicable electrical standards discovered as a result of his inspection. If within 15 days after receipt of written notice of an electrical violation, the person notified does not rectify the condition, the inspector shall notify the electric utility firm, public utility district, rural electrification association or municipality district supplying power.tothe premises. Upon notice in writing from the inspector, the supplier of electrical power may discontinue services to the premises where the alleged violation exists. (§ 1 ch 89 SLA 1969) Sec. 18.60.640. SCOPE OF WORK COVERED, (a) Sections 580- -660 of this chapter cover only new installations and alterations to existing instal- lations: (b) These standards are the recommended minimum standards for all new structures in the state. (§ 1 ch 89 SLA 1969) Sec. 48.60.650. PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS. A person who installs electrical wiring not in compliance with minimum electrical standards as set out in § 580 of this chapter, and who fails to correct this wiring after 'having been notified in writing by an authorized inspector, upon conviction is punishable by a fine of not more than $1,000. (§ 1 ch 89 SEA 1969) CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS Sec. 438.18.121, SUSPENSION AND REVOCATION OF REGISTRATION. (a) If the Insurance required in § 101 of this chapter ceases to be in effect, the registration of the contractor shall be suspended until the insurance has been reinstated. (f•) If the comnlssioner of labor determines that a person is acting as a" contractor In violation of this chapter, he shall give written notice prohibiting further action by the person as a contractor. The prohibition continues 'until the person' has submitted evidence acceptable to the commissioner of labor showing that the violation has been corrected. (g) A person affected by an order issued under this chapter may seek equitable relief preventing the commissioner of labor from enforcing the order. (§ 2 ch T00 SLA 1968; an § 1 ch 37 SLA 1974) Set. '08,18.131. INUUNCTION. In an action instituted in the superior court by the commissioner of labor or his representative, a person acting in the capacity 'of a contractor 1n violation of:this chapter may be enjoined from doing so. {§ 2 ch 100 SLA 1968; am § 2 ch 37 SLA 1971) Sec.' 08,18.141. MISDEMEANOR. A person vatting in the capacity of a contractor In violation of this 'chapter Is guilty of a misdemeanor. ( §. 2 ch 100 SLA 1968) CERTIFICATE OF FITNESS Sec. 18:62.070. PERSONS REQUIRED TO OBTAIN CERTIFICATE. A person engaged in one of the following trades shall first obtain from the department the appropriate certificate of fitness in that trade: (1) 'electrical wiring' subject to the standards established in AS 18.60.580; and (2) plumbing subject to the uniform plumbing code, as established in AS 18:60. 705, (§ 1 ch 12 SLA 1974)) Sec. 18.62.080. PENALTY. A person, either an employer or-employee, who violates a provision of this chapter or of a regulation issued under ' this • chapter is' guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, is punishable by a fine' of not more than $500; (§ 1 ch 12 SLA 1974). Copies of applicable statutes and regulations may be obtained by contacting the Mechanical Inspection Section. QaaoVSP September 8, 1982 Mr. Marlin Knight Kodiak Island Housing Authority P.O. Box 172 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 SUBJECT: Proposed Water 6 Sewer Improvements Your Project AK -02 •P013 -011 Dear Marlin: The water system improvements shown on sheet C -6 of the plan profile drawings of the subject project are approved except as follows: 1. Provide an 8 "x8" "T" at the point where the 8 -inch ductile iron pipe turns off Woody Way onto Woody Circle. We would pre- fer an 8 -inch butterfly valve be installed on the dead end side of this "T ". At such time as the main is extended in the future, pipe can be connected to the valve without interupting service to the low income housing development. If constructed as shown with a 90° elbow, it would be necessary to remove the elbow and install a "T ". This would require shutting the main down and would result in an interruption to the water service of at least a full day. 2. It is proposed to install a master meter for the development at the entrance to the property. This will require an accessible structure able to withstand traffic. A standard manhole structure will be acceptable. We would consider such alternate proposals as you might wish to offer for a structure to house the water meter. The details of the sewer system we understand are being revised with designs being prepared by URS Engineers. As these designs become available, we will review them and comment. Please contact us for any questions you might have. cerel Larry Mon .e City Engineer LKM / ak cc: Dave Crowe, Borough Engineer POST OFFICE BOX 1397. KODIAK . ALASKA 99615 PHONE (907) 486 -3224 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM September 2, 1982 Bryce W. Gordon, Building Official David C. Crowe, Borough Engineer Building Permits, Kodiak Island Housing Authority Low-Cost Housing Project When | read City Engineer Larry Monroe's (undated) letter to KIHA, copy received here August 27, | noted that he had approved only Drawings C-2 and C-3 which deal with road and drainage improvements. | called Mr. Monroe this morning and asked that he review the utility plans on Drawing C-6 and give us a letter of approosl. Please make sure that we have that letter of approval before issuing the building permit or that a notation is included on each permit indicating that it is being issued subject to approval of utility plans by the City of Kodiak. cc: Ann M. Moen Community Development Department (Case File) Marlin Knight Kodiak Island Housing Authority Kodiak, Alaska 99615 SUBJECT: Proposed Improvements on Woody Way Your Project AK- 02-P013-011 Dear Marlin: Kodiak Island Borough Engineering Department RECEIVED , AUG 2 71982i AM PM 7 1819110111112111213141516. The improvements proposed to be accomplished in connection with the subject project within public right-of-way; grading, paving, curbs & gutters, etc as shown on Drawings C-2 and C-3 by Design Lab, Inc, dated March 31, 1982 and revised 7/30/82 are approved with the addition of a' 4 foot wide gravel surface walk on one side of the proposed.pavement instead of a 3 foot walk as shown on the typical road section detail, sheet C-2. Please advise us of your proposed schedule for accomplishing these improvements. Also advise us of your proposal for installation of sanitary sewer when you have determined what you are going to do. ince Larry Monroe, gineer POST OFFICE BO'S 1397. KODIAK ALMA 99615 PHONE (907) 486-3224 C.--;',1":7;:. -1,4 • 13.02.010 Turn on, turn off authority. No person except as authorized by the Borough Manager or hiS designee shall turn on or off any corpOration stop, curb stop or valve, or in any manner disturb the Borough water system. there repairs to service, from curb stop to buildings are necessary, persons may turn ' off. curb stop for only such time as is required to make such repairs. 13.02.020 Depth of pipes, curb stop to premises. All pipes leading from curb stop to premises shall be laid at suffiCient depth and covered in such a - manner as to be protected from freezing (sixty inches being thc minimum depth), , or protected with adequate 13.02.030 Meters. Ireadout,waferteter on any insulation. The-BoroughlahalkFiequire-Allecalii&aiMggt0 1.7, • ,7,plidd7tO7tha7prem1ses by such service:TrIf7,r64#6W1IFWEii.JiffflkinniThliVa7 the picipczty"lirie and the recorder ;j1- b� ist11e on: the tirtar4..at:,Cf:#10 Ustomer'!s'fbUliding ] L. — 13.02.040 Access to curb stops and meters. BOrough.designated personnel • shall have free access to curb stops and meters at all times, and all pCrsons are prohibited from piling rubbish or other material thereon. 13.02%050 Shutoff without notice:" Water May'at any time bb shut off from the mains without notice, for repairs, ,extensions, or other necessary purposes, and persons having connections requiring steady pressure are cautioned of this danger. 13.02.060 Delinquency and penalty. All accounts that are unpaid after .the fifteenth (15th) of the month will be considered delinquent. All delinquent -;accounts will be listed on a shut-off" register and a Copy: of such register will be made available to the Borough Manager. Accounts on the shut-off regis- ter may be disconnected from service. Na service-will be reinstated until the . following actions have occurred: 1. The orginal delinquent amount-has been paid;: 2. The,fulltwo months deposit has been made; and 3. A deposit equal to the estimated cots of disconnecting and rein-- ' stating the service has been paid, with total cost.to be determined as set forth in 13.01.080. Any excess deposit will be refunded, and any balance due will be billed on the next monthly billing. ' 13.02.070 Service discontinuance for noncompliance. If the consumer fails to comply with any of the regulations of this chapter or subsequent, ordinanccS governing or pertaining to the distribution of water by the Borough, I.roMtime to Ordinance No. 52.--3-0 Page 7 DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION SOUTHCENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE Brice Gordon Building Official Engineering Department Kodiak Island borough Box 3131 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 JAY S. HAMMOND, GOVERNOR 437 E. STREET SECOND FLOOR O ANCHORAGE, ALASICA 99501 (907) 274-2533 P.O. BOX 615 J KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 (907) 486-3350 P.O. BOX 1207 O SOLDOTNA, ALASKA 99669 (907) 262-5210 August 31, 1982, P.O. BOX 1709 Li VALDEZ, ALASKA 99686 (907) 835-4698 P.O. BOX 1064 O WASILLA, ALASKA 99687 (907) 376-5038 Dear Mr. Gordon: K.A.N.A., who is building a new structure on the location for the new U.S.P.H.S. housing site, will be hooking to the existing sewage system installed for the housing addition. Since the wastewater will be handled in this manner, A.D.E.C. certification will not be necessary. Sincerely, Harold Brighton District Sanitarian cc; Jerome Selby/Health Director, KANA Jim Allen/ADEE, Anchorage Kodiak Island Borough Kodiak, Alaska RECEIVED SEP 1 01982 A 1,1 PM 7,111.°11,111P0-101ifiqi0 I STIEE 'Yaa ML JAY S. HAMMOND, GOVERNOR William Nix Commissioner Pouch 6313 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETV Anchorage, Alaska 99502 DIVISION OF FIRE PREVENTION Phone: 272-2406 August 17, 1982 Mr. Hernan Amaya, Project Architect Design Lab Inc. 625 West 5th Avenue Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Subject: Kodiak Island Housing Authority Low Income Public Housing Building "A", 7 plex, 82-D-095A Building "B", 8 plex, 82-D-095B Building "C", 9 plex, 82-D-095C 8_plex, Building "E", 8 plex, 82D-095E Building "F", 8 plex, 82-D-095F Building "G", Community Center, 82-D-095G U.B.0 Occupancy: R-1/B-2 Type of Construction: 17-N Dear Mr. Amaya: Plans for the subject facility have been reviewed by this office for conformity with the Alaska Fire Safety Code and are approved as submitted. Approval of submitted plans is not approval of omissions or oversights by this office; nor is it approval of noncompliance with any applicable regulations of municipal government. . It must be understood that the inclusion of and compliance with State Fire Safety Regulations does not preclude the necessity of compliance with the requirements of local codes, regulations and ordinances. If this office can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact us at the above address or call 272-2404. GRC:DT:rw cc: Director Applicable fire dept. Building official 12-L11 LH Sincerely, GARY R. CROUSE Acting Director Assistant State Fire Marshal By: Dave Taylor Fire Protection Engifieer 16- -TRANSMITTAL LETTER AIA DOCUMENT G810 PROJECT: Kodiak Island Low Income Public Housing (name, address) Kodiak, Alaska TO: I— Kodiak Island' Housing Authority P.O. Box 197 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 ATTN: Mr. Marlin Knight L Executive Director WE TRANSMIT: ( ) herewith ( ) in accordance with your request FOR YOUR: ( ) approval ( ) review & comment (xx) use THE FOLLOWING: ( ) Drawings ( ) Specifications ( ) Change Order ( ) under separate J ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 7914 DATE: 17 August 1982 If enclosures are not as noted, please inform us immediately. If checked below, please: ( ) Acknowledge receipt of enclosures. ( ) Return enclosures to us. cover via ) distribution to ) record parties ( ) Shop Drawing Prints ( ) Shop Drawing Reproducibles ( ) information ( ) Samples ( ) Product Literature COPIES DATE REV. NO. DESCRIPTION ACTION CODE 1 Copy of- letter form the State of Alaska, Dept. of Public Safety, 'in reference to approval of the Kodiak Low Income Project. ACTION A. Action indicated on item transmitted CODE B. No action required C. For signature and return to this office REMARKS Please remit to the proper department. D. For signature and forwarding as noted below under REMARKS E. See REMARKS below COPIES TO: (with enclosures) 0 0 0 0 BY: AIA DOCUMENT C810 • TRANSMITTAL LETTER • APRIL 1970 EDITION • AIA® • COPYRIGHT © 1970 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF 'ARCHITECTS, 1785 MASSACHUSETTS AVENUE, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20036 ONE PAGE • / DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY Y DIVISION OF FIRE PREVENTION August 17, 1982 Mr. Hernan Amaya,- Project Architect Design Lab Inc. 625 West 5th Avenue Anchorage, Alaska 99501 ‘14.1 5th a 76. — 12 -L11 LH Dear Mr. Amaya: JAY S. HAMMOND, GOVERNOR William Nix Commissioner Pouch 6313 Anchorage, Alaska 99502 Phone: 272 -2406 Subject: Kodiak Island Housing Authority Low Income Public Housing Building "A ", 7 plex, 82- D -095A Building "B", 8 plex, 82- D -095B Building "C", 9 plex, 82- D -095C Building' "D ", 8 plex, 82- D -095D Building "E ", 8 plex, 82- D -095E Building "F ", 8 plex, 82- D -095F Building "G ", Community Center, 82- D -095G U.B.0 Occupancy: R -1 /B -2 Type of Construction: V -N Plans for the subject facility have been reviewed by this office for conformity with the Alaska Fire Safety Code and are approved'as submitted. Approval of submitted plans is not approval of omissions or oversights by this office; nor is it approval of noncompliance with any applicable regulations of municipal government. It must be understood that the inclusion of and compliance with State Fire Safety Regulations does not preclude the necessity of compliance with the requirements of local codes, regulations and ordinances. If this office can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact us at the above address or call 272 -2404. GRC:DT:rw cc: Director Applicable fire dept. Building official Sincerely, GARY R. CROUSE Acting Director Assistant State Fire Marshal CMWOk Dave Taylor Fire Protection Engineer DESIGN LAB INC. 625 WEST FIFTH AVENUE ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99501 KODIAK ISLAND HOUSING AUTHORITY LOW INCOME PUBLIC HOUSING - HUD PROJECT AK02-B013-011 ADDENDUM NO. 3: MAY 26, 1982 TO: ALL PLANHOLDERS OF RECORD This Addendum forms a part of the Contract Documents and modifies the original Drawings and Specifications, dated March 31, 1982. Acknowledge receipt of this Addendum on the Bid Form. Failure to do so may subject bidder to disqualification. This Addendum consists of 1 Page and 1 Drawing. SPECIFICATIONS ITEM 1: Section 07240 - Exterior Insulation and Finish System, Paragraph 7 - Insulation; add the following subparagraph: 7.3. The heavy glass fiber reinforcing mesh (Panzer Mesh), and its base coat (Panzer Mesh Base), shall be applied to all buildings up to six feet from ground level. DRAWINGS ITEM 2: Sheet A-1. Insert new Sheet A-1 revised on 25 May, 1982. This revision clarifies and changes the playstructures model numbers. ITEM 3: Sheet A-10. Doors & Frames Schedule - Buildings A, B t C. Door No. 100 - Jamb and head details shall he as shown on Sheet R-1, sill similar to detail shown on Sheet R-2. Sheets R-1 and R-2 are part of Addendum No. 2. ITEM 4: Sheet ME-1. Note No. 1 - Change minimum depth to 5 feet. End of Addendum - UN.SSIMMACIPlo qN KODIAK ISLAND. BOROUGH Name Address ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION NON-STRUCTURAL PLAN CHECK dc/ Telephone Property Description Architect 01 e_si Address /, Permit No. Plan Ck. No. Property Line Setbacks: Front Maximum Area by,Code: Basic 6 Occupancy Const. Sprinkler Rear 6 /f Side Side Increase for Sprinklers Increase for Side Yards TOTAL Building Use Building Area: Basement 1st Floor 2nd Floor tlilgtoor - Area Separations HR Ratings Occupancy Separations HR Ratings Attic Draft Stops Vertical Shafts Corridor Const. Exits Required: Basement 1st Floor 2nd Floor 3rd Floor Total Width Enclosed Openings Openings HR Ratings HR Ratings Heating Fuel Special Fire Resistive Assemblies Cooling System Comments 'V. i 7 7 3:34- r; 5 itzel s%/5 0.A. c(41 P \co.-il gal f or /I s ct-4/v( Ow e2-- tu- f VV J[ ".( zud < • rX-6 oZAr We (/ 7a,..11,6 V 1= Tx-e. Plans Examiner Date KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH Name ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION NON—STRUCTURAL PLAN CHECK t. Address Telephone /_ Property�Duscrlption / Architect elf? °^ Address L/t/ Permit No. Plan Ck. No. Occupancy Const. Sprinkler Property Line Setbacks: Front Rear Side Side Maximum Area by Code: Basic Increase for Sprinklers Increase for Side Yards TOTAL Building Use Building Area: Basement .1st Floor 2nd Floor '=�/-/ � 'w^v�mm Area Separations HR Ratings Openings HR Ratings Occupancy Separations HR Ratings Openings HR Ratings Attic Draft Stops Vertical Shafts Corridor Const. Exits Required: Basement 1st Floor 2nd Floor 3rd Floor Total Width Enclosed Heating Fuel Cooling System Special Fire Resistive Assemblies Comments // /' 6* 77 3 9-- Plans Examiner Date KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH 3 t °0 -224. 77-" 6 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION NON—STRUCTURAL PLAN CHECK Vi Name .Address Property Description Architect nt e s rik W a gr? ey4. Address Telephone r:1 Permit No. Plan Ck. No. 2 Occupancy) Const. hr Sprinkler--- Property Line Setbacks: Front 94 ft Rear 3, 6' ' Side tO1 Side ,./.)1 Maximum Area by Code: toP C Basic -. Wo-ar o ars Ta 1- Increase for Sprinklers-- Increase for Side Yards TOTAL Building Use nilext -r v4- Building Area; Basement ,lst Floor 2nd Floor 3rd Floor . 3 7 teie 760 7 2 3 a 5P c9 Area Separationsnytk/A40'R Ratings / Openings HR Ratings Occupancy Separations HR Ratings Openings—' HR Ratings Attic Draft Stops / Vertical Shafts Corridor Const. Exits Required: Basement 1st Floor 2nd Floor 3rd Floor Total Width 1-6 fx6 Enclosed Heating hp kttro 1 Special Fire Resistive Fuel e), Assemblies Cooling System 6,4 2, coirt(e R//6 rn-vva 8 ( Comments 6 q 52; , Plans Examiner Date ' /) KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH u ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION NON—STRUCTURAL PLAN CHECK Name Kodta Address Tel ± a4 Property Description - IdArchitect `v -/^�5' '\ Address y 13- , WS 4 0 e ``- ' Permit No. Plan Ck. No. Occupancy Const. Sprinkler ~— Property Line Setbacks: 'Front Rear Side Side Maximum Area by Code: 6206 � Basic m Increase for Sprinklers increase for Side Yards TOTAL Building Use Building Area: Basement 1st Floor 2nd Floor 3rd Floor 1 /�/ � �. Area Separations / HR Ratings Openings HR Ratings Occupancy Separations HR Ratings Openings HR Ratings Attic Draft Stops Vertical Shafts Corridor Const. Exits Required: Basement 1st Floor 2nd Floor 3rd Floor Total Width Enclosed Heating Fuel Cooling System Special Fire Resistive Assemblies Comments V^y �� ' °~/� ��»�� «��' Plans Examiner Date 31 .45 x-7._ KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION NON—STRUCTURAL PLAN CHECK Name \ Address Lk flou 5 Telephone VAOri‘a WCXL-/ 4 Property Description Architect L,. r Address 6 zr , v Permit No. Plan Ck. No. / Occupancy Property Line Setbacks: Front a0, d ' Rear ic,2 3 - Maximum Area by Code: Basic 4 606 PP) I /It- 4.t Increase for Sprinklers --- Increase for Side Yards , TOTAL tal■■• Const.3—g9 Sprinkler 4 Side2 /-6 Side '4 ' A Building Use / 4:4111174- PI Ark rip", Building Area: Basement 1st Floor 2nd Floor 3rd Floor 21 79903C Area Separationse, thhirHR Ratings -1--- Openings ----- HR Ratings Occupancy separations1uj lJ4rHR Ratings 1 Openings *---..--• HR Ratings .... Attic Draft Stops / Reke-kVerti cal Shafts Corridor Const 4. v Exits Required: Basement 1st Floor 2nd Floor ' 3rd Floor Total Width Enclosed Heating ita,".01,,e- Fuel 0 t Coo 1 i ng System Special Fire Resistive Assemblies 5(:f.et F-sr :Seth() k g AV(' 5 Ao-tvwk- SA id I/1°44 Jzv 45)‘ 641:1( vvP tic rgi-vCia(//Q Comments 34 6,7100 Ya- Plans Examiner Date U Z�� / � � � 1:-.1J� `-' KODIAK ISLAND. BOROUGH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION NON—STRUCTURAL PLAN CHECK � Name �� cos /l•:i Telephone Address Property y DZ escrip/ tion Architect ref., � L {- I, Address L/ 1 � ~/ c . '. ' ~ Maximum Area by Code: . Basic cool-Ay-6 19?6 �� /,/r C S"/ V /y . - Sprinklers ., - .~ Increase for upnnz/ers Increase for Side Yards TOTAL /c. {- * °e- Pennit No. Plan Ck. No. :5 Occupancy Const / A Sprinklar - Property Line Setbacks: Front / Rear a 5 ~ Side 3-c? Side D5- Building Use 9 gp^K 0'mdS • Building Area: Basement :1st Floor 2nd Floor 3rd Floor • /^~c-~- U 6 ~ =_ 1 -w 6 / / ' w o Area Separatlons804u1-HR Ratings / /fr, Openings -~---- HR Ratings ------' Occupancy Separations HR Ratings.- ' Openings HR Rating Attic Draft Stops / / Vertical Shafts Corridor Const. ^----- Exits Required: Basement 1st Floor 2nd Floor 3rd Floor 'Total Width . 3/ _ /) ^ Enclosed Heating tl(N k«/^�6,' Fuel /, / / Special � ^� 8 � uY�� A'� �� // /� Q i � � � h�, /7 � � �� vy � ��/ � 7� yxw/( /�� Cooling System Comments yAcw )2C / Plans Examin/r • Date P)( '� .~ KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION NON—STRUCTURAL PLAN CHECK Name Telephone �� Address ~=~ Property Description Architect Address Permit Nm, Plan Ck. No, Occupancy Const. Sprinkler Property Line Setbacks: Front Rear Side Side Maximum Area by Code: Basic Increase for Sprinklers Increase for Side Yards TOTAL Building Use Building Area: Basement 1st Floor 2nd F|oor 3rd Floor ra-2— �� '� � � �� / � ~*� Area Separations HK Ratings Occupancy Separations HR Ratings Attic Draft Stops Vertical Shafts 'Openings Openings HR Ratings HR Ratings Corridor Const. Exits Required: Basement 1st Floor 2nd Floor 3rd Floor Total Width Enclosed Heating Fuel Cooling System Special Fire Resistive Assemblies Comments /�~��-/ ) �7 �r, / t 'u /.�u�.°-~ / ,�p~ Plans Examiner Date KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION NON-STRUCTURAL PLAN CHECK Name Kd Address Telephone Property Description Architect Address Permit No, Plan Ck. No. Occupancy Const. Sprinkler Property Line SetbaokS: Front - Rmar Side Side Maximum' Area by Coda: Basic Increase for Sprinklers Increase for Side YardS Building Use. Building Area: Basement 1st^Flpor 2nd Floor 3rd Floor //F-1 `' ~ ~_ ` Area Separations HR Ratings Openings HR Ratings Occupancy Separations HR Ratings Openings HR Ratings Attic Draft Stops Vertical Shafts Corridor Const. Exits Required: ' Basement 1st Floor 2nd Floor 3rd Floor Total Width Enclosed . Heating 'Fuel Cooling System Special Fire Resistive Assemblies "/ (k./e-- Comments \/G /rJ- .�_. C J� / � x! �°, ��+�� / �- � y /� � r'.� °~r- ' Plans Examiner Date AN- T5..R.1■IAT. t°1�4�L1� STcCRAsE. ti 2E S -T7 r3 ,�A � � 731Z:44 4 cc/Il-- wC -Z71? 32 A.rrKOVISt7 Ql.l,�l... �--�Y UGTU i��.: 5 1-t'� ! L ;" --/ ... , ICI "1 g1 L t� Hcr" -71-t1 N 51 -p o i• T IC c c s_ 11=20. � - L a _' �V !` =G`�P1 E- NT' FLAG a i �r cr. 1Z 1N 0 � �-,�Y �'I�C"i' �!_LI �,_ G� ---T�, �M �1�5 �N� �, I e 1 N 21 h' H,q GG (1 vt,� T► ' /4\1- 1, CSI -. Y ✓�I"tz��'V I�� Is I L.L. I I i TPP1l.�12 c. c c I H & -} 1.elp,NU r.\CTI X25 1.-6 • I /---K I T — j-4. SIB 11= GA--t I `.i hN VN (� a°�4c:�r* T�G'I�i 17112 :S :. 71 , di N Cp I‹T 1-i ,t 2 , a� P>� u 1 *v \ ;T • A -N T S.44 43 � 57tI a 23c2, 14, ti L. 00 1 4 E6 �F._a 10(c 102 oc- 1 ■ L-1"-lh‘letaZ-Ac.= 73,coO i '°A /A io 1 A ko 0 J — I--+IC-4- I.-1-.IA •' RIGiHT ' l.``1'' lb L�•Y ‘TCIIGT �I S � I ,1‹,.S �1 N • FIC;71 G-(' '\17-'1 Nb ur- 11V 1 I coN�! \ LK 144- 1 2.50. 001 ° 57 "L • IiG t71 i< NSA c-,•(- I'vt5A41;/ 11�I 2.3E.1 - u NG7 Nz14 °43' S7R iii A05 Iteilp7--L " t4: 1 N 1. -1.1GN 02. 100 NC.: 100 104- QLO L 1- U IC, cc :2H