Loading...
ISLAND VISTA BK 4 LT 7 - VarianceCliff and Evelyn Davidson P.O. Box 746 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Kodiak Island Borough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 September 21, 1990 Re: Case 90-058. Request for a variance from Section 17.17.050.A.1 (Yards) and 17.17.060 (Building Height Limit) of the Borough Code to permit the completion of a partially constructed single-family residence which encroaches no more than eleven (11) feet into the required twenty- five (25) foot front yard setback and which projects fifteen and one half (15.5) feet beyond the thirty-five (35) foot height restriction of the RR1-- Rural Residential One Zoning District; and A variance from Section 17.17.050.B (Yards) of the Borough Code to permit the completion of a partially constructed single- family residence which encroaches no more than one and one-half (1.5) feet into the required fifteen (15) foot side yard setback of the RR1--Rural Residential One Zoning District. Lot 7, Block 4, Island Vista Subdivision. 1802 Marmot Dear Cliff and Evelyn: The Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting on September 18, 1990, granted the variance requests cited above, subject to the following condition: If a Certificate of Occupancy is not issued within three (3) years (September 19, 1993) of the date of this approval, the variances will expire. THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT ALLOW ANY CONSTRUCTION TO BEGIN. Zoning compliance and/or a building permit must first be obtained. Please contact this office for further details. Kodiak Island Borough Cliff and Evelyn Davidson September 21, 1990 Page Two An appeal of this decision may be initiated by any person or party aggrieved by filing a written notice of appeal with the Borough Clerk within ten (10) days of the date of the Commission's decision. The notice of appeal must state the specific grounds for the appeal and the relief sought by the applicant. Therefore, the Commission's decision will not be final and effective until ten (10) days following the decision. Failure to utilize these variances within twelve (12) months after their effective date shall cause their cancellation. Please bring this letter when you come to our office to obtain zoning compliance for any construction on the lot. Please also be aware that it is illegal to store building materials in the Marmot Drive right-of-way. You are required to have all materials located in the right-of-way removed from the right-of-way within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter. The recently completed as-built for your property should allow you to identify which materials are in the right-of- way and which materials are on your lot. The Commission adopted the following findings of fact in support of their decisions: BUILDING HEIGHT VARIANCE 1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or intended use of development. which generally do not apply to other properties in the same land use district. The exceptional circumstances applicable to the intended use of the development on this property, which generally do not apply to other lots in the same land use district, is the existence of a significant drainage area that crosses the middle of the lot. The drainage flows towards the rear of the lot and due to its location, requires that development on Lot 7 be located towards the front of the lot where access is available. In order Kodiak Island Borough Cliff and Evelyn Davidson September 21, 1990 Page Three for the applicant to realize the reasonable use of the land that others in the RR1--Rural Residential One Zoning District enjoy, the applicant has located the structure within the required front and side yard setbacks of the lot. In addition, because of the limited amount of arable land for development at the front of the lot, the applicant has built to a higher elevation than the Borough Zoning Code permits in this district. 2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would not permit the completion of the single-family dwelling unless it can be shown that the structure was legally located on the lot at the time construction was begun, or, that it can now be finished for less than fifty (50) percent of the replacement value. This is a practical difficulty as the department has no record of the project on file and it would be more costly and time consuming to try and assess the value of construction necessary before the structure can be completed. Denial of the variance would be an unnecessary hardship as there is really no better location for the development of a dwelling on the lot. The additional floor area of the proposed dwelling that, if afforded by a variance of the height requirements of the district, is reasonable in order to compensate for the relative lack of accessible, developable lot area elsewhere on the property. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare. Granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare. The completed superstructure has been a Kodiak Island Borough Cliff and Evelyn Davidson September 21, 1990 Page Four local landmark for many years and staff has not documented any complaints or problems with that location since the initial construction. In fact, if the property owner could show that the structure is a legal nonconforming structure where it is presently located, it could remain where is, as is, indefinitely. To permit the property owner to finish the structure (to the standards of the UBC) would be an improvement to the neighborhood in terms of aesthetics and perhaps property values as well. The cupola noted on the as-built survey does not add usable floor space to the structure and therefore is considered an architectural feature. For this reason it is not considered in the calculation of building height for this case. 4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The 1968 Comprehensive Plan does not address this area. Granting of the variance will not permit an increase in development density over the other dwellings located in this particular area and zoning district. 5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance. The actions of the applicant may have caused the conditions from which relief is being sought by variance, however, staff' believes that the applicant would have requested a variance previously if they had understood that it was necessary. 6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the district involved. Single-Family Dwellings are a permitted use in the RR1--Rural Residential One Zoning District. / Kodiak Island Borough Cliff and Evelyn Davidson September 21, 1990 Page Five SIDE YARD VARIANCE The side yard encroachment of the structure on Lot 7, Block 4, is subsidiary and incidental to the more significant projections into the front yard and beyond the height limit in the RR1--Rural Residential One Zoning District. 2. If the Commission grants a variance for the front yard encroachment and the overall height projection of the structure it is doubtful that a variance would be denied for this minor side yard encroachment, making a second public hearing more or less redundant. 3. Since there is no structure developed on adjoining Lot 6, Block 4, Island Vista Subdivision, the minor encroachment into the side yard by the structure located on Lot 7 will have no effect surrounding development. If you have any questions about the action of the Commission, please contact the Community Development Department. Sincerely, Linda L. Freed, Director Community Development Department cc: Bud Cassidy, Resource Management Officer endanger the public's health. safety or general welfare. (B) be inconsistent with the general purposes and intent of this title and (C) adversely impact other properties or uses in the neighborhood. The proposed use will not significantly increase the traffic in the area. The proposed use will not be harmful to the public health, safety, or general welfare if all building, fire, and plumbing codes are met in the process of constructing a second story residential and commercial addition. Locating the apartments at the rear of the building will minimize exposure to tsunami run -up. B. The proposed use fulfills all other requirements of Chapter 17.21 (Business) of the Borough Code and the previously approved parking variance granted (Case 89-042) for seven (7) off -street parking spaces. C. Setbacks and minimum lot area are not applicable in the B-- Business Zoning District. As noted by staff in Case 89 -042, the existing commercial structure is located in a long established business area where buffers have not been required and are not applicable. Standards required by Borough Code will be maintained, when applicable, through the zoning compliance process. The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll call vote. L) Case 90 -058. Request for a variance from Section 17.17.050.A.1 and B. (Yards) and 17.17.060 (Building Height . limit) of the Borough Code to permit the completion of a partially constructed single - family residence which encroaches no more than eleven (11) feet into the required twenty -five (25) foot front yard setback and no more than one and one -half (1.5) feet into the required fifteen (15) foot side yard setback and which projects fifteen and one half (15.5) feet beyond the thirty - five (35) foot height restriction of the RR1- -Rural Residential One Zoning District. Lot 7, Block 4. Island Vista Subdivision. 1802 Marmot (Cliff and Evelyn Davidson) P &ZbeauW: DUANE DVORAK indicated 28 public hearing notices were mailed for this case and 4 were returned, 3 in favor and 1 opposing this request. Staff recommended approval of this request. Regular Session Closed. Public Hearing Opened: RICHARD DIEMER appeared before the Commission and read a public hearing notice response into the record. The public hearing notice response expressed non - objection to this request, subject to conditions. CLIFF DAVIDSON appeared before the Commission and expressed support for this request. 9, 1990 Page 9 of 37 DOUG MATHERS appeared before the Commission and expressed support for this request. Public Hearing Closed. Regular Session Opened. The Commission, with input from Community Development Department staff, discussed possible conditions of approval for the variance. COMMISSIONER HARTT MOVED TO GRANT a variance from Section 17.17.050A1 and 17.17.060 of the Borough Code to permit the completion of a partially constructed single - family residence which encroaches no more than eleven (11) feet into the required twenty -five (25) foot front yard setback and which projects fifteen and one half (15.5) feet beyond the thirty -five (35) foot height restriction of the RR1- -Rural Residential One Zoning District on Lot 7, Block 4, Island Vista Subdivision; and to adopt the findings contained in the staff report dated September 12, 1990, as "Findings of Fact" for this case. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or intended use of development. which generally do not apply to other properties in the same land use district. The exceptional circumstances applicable to the intended use of the development on this property, which generally • do not apply to other lots in the same land use district, is the existence of a significant drainage area that crosses the middle of the lot. The drainage flows towards the rear of the lot and due to its location, requires that development on Lot 7 be located towards the front of the lot where access is available. In order for the applicant to realize the reasonable use of the land that others in the RR1- -Rural Residential One Zoning District enjoy, the applicant has located the structure within the required front and side yard setbacks of the lot. In addition, because of the limited amount of arable land for development at the front of the lot, the applicant has built to a higher elevation than the Borough Zoning Code permits in this district. 2. Strict Application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would not permit the completion of the single - family dwelling unless it can be shown that the structure was legally located on the lot at the time construction was begun, or, that it can now be finished for less than fifty (50) percent of the replacement value. This is a practical difficulty as the department has no record of the project on file and it would be more costly and time consuming to try and P & Z Minutes: September 1 8, 1990 Page 10 of 37 assess the value of construction necessary before the structure can be completed. Denial of the variance would be an unnecessary hardship as there is really no better location for the development of a dwelling on the lot. The additional floor area of the proposed dwelling that, if afforded by a variance of the height requirements of the district, is reasonable in order to compensate for the relative lack of accessible. developable lot area elsewhere on the property. 3. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health. safety and welfare. Granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare. The completed superstructure has been a local landmark for many years and staff has not documented any complaints or problems with that location since the initial construction. In fact, if the property owner could show that the structure is a legal nonconforming structure where it is presently located, it could remain where is, i§ la, indefinitely. To permit the property owner to finish the structure (to the standards of the UBC) would be an improvement to the neighborhood in terms of aesthetics and perhaps property values as well. The cupola noted on the as -built survey does not add usable floor space to the structure and therefore is considered an architectural feature. For this reason it is not considered in the calculation of building height for this case. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan., The 1968 Comprehensive Plan does not address this area. Granting of the variance will not permit an increase in development density over the other dwellings located in this particular area and zoning district. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance. The actions of the applicant may have caused the conditions from which relief is being sought by variance. however. staff believes that the applicant would have requested a variance previously if they had understood that it was necessary. 6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the district involved. Single - family dwellings are a permitted use in the RR1 -- Rural Residential One Zoning District. P & Z Minutes: September 19, 1990 Page 11 of 37 The motion was seconded. COMMISSIONER HARPY MOVED TO AMEND THE MAIN MOTION by adding the following condition of approval: CONDITION OF APPROVAL 1. If a Certificate of Occupancy is not issued within three (3) years (September 19, 1993) of the date of this approval, the variances will expire. The AMENDMENT was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll call vote. The question was called and the MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED by unanimous roll call vote. COMMISSIONER HARTT MOVED TO GRANT a variance from Section 17.17.050.B of the Borough Code to permit the completion of a partially constructed single - family residence which encroaches no more than one and one -half (1.5) feet into the required fifteen (15) foot side yard setback of the RR1- -Rural Residential One Zoning District on Lot 7, Block 4, Island Vista Subdivision; and to adopt the findings contained in the staff report dated September 12, 1990, as "Findings of Fact" for this case, and subject to the following condition of approval: CONDITION OF APPROVAL 1. If a Certificate of Occupancy is not issued within three (3) years (September 19, 1993) of the date of this approval, the variances will expire. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The side yard encroachment of the structure on Lot 7, Block 4, is subsidiary and incidental to the more significant projections into the front yard and beyond the height limit in the RR1- -Rural Residential One Zoning District. 2. If the Commission grants a variance for the front yard encroachment and the overall height projection of the structure it is doubtful that a variance would be denied for this minor side yard encroachment, making a second public hearing more or less redundant. 3. Since there is no structure developed on adjoining Lot 6, Block 4, Island Vista Subdivision, the minor encroachment into the side yard by the structure located on Lot 7 will have no effect on surrounding development. The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll call vote. The Commission directed staff to inform the property owners that it is illegal to store building materials in the Marmot Drive P & Z Minutes: Septeenber 19, 1990 Page 12 of 37 right -of -way and that all materials located in the right -of -way should be removed from the right -of -way. M) Case 90-059. Request for a variance from Sections 17.54.010A and C (Height -- Extension onto Public Property) of the Borough Code to permit the construction of a six (6) foot high chain link fence which will exceed the four (4) foot height limitation for a fence in the front yard and will project to the sidewalk within the Hillside Drive and Oak Street rights -of -way adjacent to a lot in the R1-- Single - family Residential Zoning District. Lot 24A, Block 1, Aleutian Homes Subdivision. 512 Hillside Drive (Royal Large) DUANE DVORAK indicated 51 public hearing notices were mailed and 2 were returned, 1 opposing and 1 stating non- objection to this request. Staff recommended approval of this request, subject to conditions. Regular Session Closed. Public Hearing Opened: Seeing and hearing none. Public Hearing Closed. Regular Session Opened. COMMISSIONER HODGINS MOVED TO GRANT a variance from Sections 17.54.010.A and C of the Borough Code to permit the construction of a six (6) foot high chain link fence which will exceed the four (4) foot height limitation for a fence in the front yard and will project to the sidewalk within the Hillside Drive and Oak Street rights -of -way adjacent to Lot 24A. Block 1, Aleutian Homes Subdivision; subject to the conditions of approval contained in the staff report dated September 6, 1990, adding a seventh condition which states "the construction must be standard chain link fence construction (Le., metal poles and regular mesh chain link); and to adopt the findings contained in the staff report dated September 6, 1990, as "Findings of Fact" for this case. The motion was seconded and FAILED by majority roll call vote. Commissioners Coleman, Heinrichs, Barrett, Hodgins. and Hartt voted "no." The Commission deferred adoption of findings of fact in support of their decision until the October 17, 1990, regular meeting. NJ Cue 90 -061. Request for an exception from Section 17.33.020 (Permitted Uses) of the Borough Code to permit a public radio station, studio, and office facility to locate on a lot in the PI-- Public Use Lands Zoning District; and a Request for a variance from Section 17.33.050.A (Yards) of the Borough Code to permit a public radio station, studio, and office facility to project fifteen (15) feet into the required twenty-five (25) foot front yard setback of the PL-- Public Use lands Zoning District. Lot 5A, U.S. Survey 2538. P & Z Minute: September 19. 1990 Page 13 of 37 KC IAK ISLAND BOROI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Public Hearing Item L PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE A public hearing will be held on Wednesday, September 19, 1990. The meeting will begin at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska, before the Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission, to hear comments, if any, on the following request: Case 90-058. Request for a variance from Section 17.17.050.A.1 (Yards) and 17.17.060 (Building Height Limit) of the Borough Code to permit the completion of a partially constructed single-family residence which, encroaches no more than eleven (11) feet into the required twenty-five (25) foot front yard setback and which projects fifteen and one half (15.5) feet beyond the thirty- five (35) foot height restriction of the RR1--Rural Residential One Zoning District. Lot 7, Block 4, .Island Vista Subdivision. 1802 Marmot (Cliff and Evelyn Davidson) If you do not wish to testify verbally, you may provide your comments in the space below, or in a letter to the Community Development Department prior to the meeting. This notice is being sent to you because our records indicate you are a property owner in the area of the request. If you have any questions about the request, please feel free to call us at 486-5736, extension 255. Your Name:/edW Aecile4-- Mailing Address: / Jtoli'e6 Your property description: b/. &a.2 zz.a4-64,3714 -..ced.(22)-/f ,z/d7zA/-) Comments: itey khA ii)/10 4 ,&d- aP 10/-/S/ M:sk sadCiii/9/(4~74,-) _syn6e /925- fra,t7be,d- 346 4)//cfrel,',/y /4-21 aiSA etio , fe/110,,fe ia-// WIZ Ale9 au/ Airomi/e 0,04#Kalf 16-iw shed. W ,ari.el7c&c.a.e.,e1.49///,:7%•y fate/ 51te 6a4mefrf %U4 4 eo.,*,/eiee /tae, f, ‘d.K, hi 12,o74 ese-i-r/07‘4,4)/).W/4 /--/c--e„ 4-6 /0 g Accp-v. 9/9/90 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH Community Development 710 Mill Bay Road (Room 204), Kodiak, Alaska 99615-6340 - Phone: (907) 486-5736, extension 255 or 254 ZONING CO M P L IAN CE PERMIT Permit #: , 'z -V-- 6 t . 2, 3. Property Owner /Applicant: C 1 , -1- �4, v i- SCt^,Y\ Number and size of parking spaces required jonsite identification of parking spaces is required Yes: lk : J /` Mailing Address: ( c� k �- `C G (/moo c - t S�l.�_ Phone: �� '" s--6--- /J 3 t j � �� x / i / , � �f7J�. -- ` r--, Legal Description: +— Lts (l (� LJ off- str5Ioading requirement: A Street Address: / c"-c) 2.- 04 4"✓ Ir( 1�, Tax Code #: 2.. j Z. �) q O') C� Plat related requirements (e.g., plat notes, easements, subdivision conditions, etc : _ .�, ' I U `_ Description of Existing Property /Current Zoning: 2� — s %`•.� .� �0 �f _ v� ( Minimum Required Lot Area: ii c.),/ GSera Width: ( 2-3 Other requuiifree�ments (e.g., zero lot line, additional setbacks, projections into yards, screening, etc.): I Gltrriirrzc, Actual La Area: 113/ 3 S Z- i/`� Width: ��L - p i1r� cv..- t- 1 i, (i'3 3 -6-e �.. .c. 94'j n(3-1,-2,./.. �,q�(Z Minimum Required Setbacks: Sides: % S rro ,,,,,,.fie, !/ _ �� V, C ) c.J r !A}- %p _a� �L t4-r c la Front: / �V V 4'✓fcc.z o .0 Rear: 0-(T) 11/6-0-..A....-..... - - 0 Coastal Management Program Applicable Polices (check appropriate category) - Residential:_ Business: Maximum Building Height: J 56, 5f - -1' Q , 7©- Industrial: Other (list): Use and size of existing structures on the lot ‘....PA,-ii- C // n ep L-� S4l-. Is the proposed action consistent with the KB Coastal Management Program? - Yes: No: 4 230 40-a If the proposed action conflicts with the Coastal Management Program policies, attach a sheet that notes the policy(ies), describes the conflict(s), and specifies conditions'b mitigate the conflict(s). Attachment - Yes: No: 4. Description of proposed action (attach site plan): I ,s' $ C' - R-, 1 w. e...e..--f-.4 u.- c....., � �= �?' *tea V C S.. f _ _ � . , .-..:-A f' 5. Applicant Certification: I hereby certify that I will comply with the provisions of the Kodiak Island Borough Code and that I have the authority to certify this as the property owner, or as a representative of the property owner. I agree to have Identifiable corner markers in place in the field for verification of setbacks. t By: . ,� s Date: 3 a / Title: Supporting documents attached (check): Site plan: , As -built sury Other (list): �� ....z..� LIGwrh„ ) `7) •— c s. Community Development staff for zoning, by: � "� v r � J/ Date: .-::-:,7. is Title: /45-5 3-C�� p744.4.44....._ %. Fire Chief [City of Kodiak, Flre District 111(Bayside), Womens Bay Fire District) approval for UFC (Sections 10.207 and 10.301C) by: Date: 8. Driveway Permit (State, City of Kodiak, Borough) issued by: Date: 9. Septic system PLAN approved by: Date: r-.*1 ra0,ar -e+ a ■w-. "%A 1 •/a'TI# k1 1111 1 rat 1 !AIM aft Imo— 'tia11 T ■1 rf1rA■ • Ira I I SA 1 • • a••• KC_ JAK ISLAND BOROU_'H COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Public Hearing Item L PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE A public hearing will be held on Wednesday, September 19, 1990. The meeting will begin at 7 :30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska, before the Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission, to hear comments, if any, on the following request: Case 90 -058. Request for a variance from Section 17.17.050.A.1 (Yards) and 17.17.060 (Building Height Limit) of the Borough Code to permit the completion of a partially constructed single - family residence which encroaches no. more -than_ _eleven (.111_feet._i .t4. th_e_r_equired-tuwenty ve_(25)-footJr._ont�yard - setback and which projects fifteen and one half (15.5) feet beyond the thirty - five (35) foot height restriction of the RR1- -Rural Residential One Zoning District. Lot 7, Block 4, Island Vista Subdivision. 1802 Marmot (Cliff and Evelyn Davidson) If you do not wish to testify verbally, you may provide your comments in the space below, or in a letter to the Community Development Department prior to the meeting. This notice is being sent to you because our records indicate you are a property owner in the area of the request. If you have any questions about the request, please feel free to call us at 486 -5736, extension 255. n Your Name: PIN 0 Cr& Mailing Address: %aX XI 5`E /oV kA L Your property description: L0 D L C7 T Q U \c_ ysr Comments: Tr OW C' 1l £ L CST "1--6 ,J AJ.'l) S odi t-ANTc . vi ow l( kA ∎ 5 a4 Z)-0 I. c. (i) \-4 A.) JUo o citoQ� \) et. q-kto oAf? k_41 ar 0 1,;, -4M . (-.c-v NL 6 VT1(hN u S� CO *011 i'Ottet KCB IAK ISLAND BOROi1 �H COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Public Hearing Item L PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE A public hearing will be held on Wednesday, September 19, 1990. The meeting will begin at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska, before the Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission, to hear comments, if any, on the following request: Case 90 -058. Request for a variance from Section 17.17.050.A.1 (Yards) and 17.17.060 (Building Height Limit) of the Borough Code to permit the completion of a partially constructed single - family residence which encroaches _no- more than eleven (11) .feet_ -into the req»ired twent 3r,five_(25)_footiront_yard____ setback and which projects fifteen and one half (15.5) feet beyond the thirty - five (35) foot height restriction of the RR1- -Rural Residential One Zoning District. Lot 7, Block 4, Island Vista Subdivision. 1802 Marmot (Cliff and Evelyn Davidson) If you do not wish to testify verbally, you may provide your comments in the space below, or in a letter to the Community Development Department prior to the meeting. This notice is being sent to you because our records indicate you are a property owner in the area of the request. If you have any questions about the request, please feel free to call us at 486 -5736, extension 255. �! ` RQ �_,, 4 Your Name: i vek-- Kb�10 \ Mailing Address: & �--% 1 1. Your property description: Z Si S`i M Comments: e . Z. --.r 4AAL,1 9r1A, L 6 L t cl.t t2.4_ e- r -cP eta - �- - n.Jci f) . — 4o-ci sue„ 1 4 - o w-S. C �- d �� �-« %►.�. `�� M 45) c;, cs.0 ,oke "c41' KC, ,IAK ISLAND BOR01__ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Public Hearing Item L PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE A public hearing will be held on Wednesday, September 19, 1990. The meeting will begin at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska, before the Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission, to hear comments, if any, on the following request: Case 90-058. Request for a variance from Section 17.17.050.A.1 (Yards) and 17.17.060 (Building Height Limit) of the Borough Code to permit the completion of a partially constructed single-family residence which encroaches no-more than- eleven (-11) feet- into the -required twenty-five (25)- foot-front-yard- - --- setback and which projects fifteen and one half (15.5) feet beyond the thirty- five (35) foot height restriction of the RR1--Rural Residential One Zoning District. Lot 7, Block 4, Island Vista Subdivision. 1802 Marmot (Cliff and Evelyn Davidson) If you do not wish in a letter to the Community This notice is being sent If you have any questions extension 255. Your Name: i\--1, to testify verbally, you may provide your comments Development Department prior to the meeting. in the space below, or in the area of the request. at 486-5736, to you because our records indicate you are a property owner about the request, please feel free to call us 1---,..._9„, MalllngAddreaa: P Your property description: Comments: / j-at- ? 6 iLL ) / r° ,..,417-N,Q— ^-) Q.— 111''IL _ad.e. • o w A afAiil. wt ,...•,.....ifonIas • meal= . SEP 8 fli. eett7 . 6 --&-L7 DEVELOPMENT 74 co 14UNITY DEPT p5, cd,,,,st ,,,,...,._ --6-- a . iz_ 1,,,,-,, L.r.„.._ 12,,,,A, Kodiak Island Borough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 Osr R6125020020 STARK ETAL1TIMOTHY ,,--MILA COLEMAN SR BOX 2159 'ot Fumarlial KODIAK AK 99615 his OM** ,s AV* 2.z, 1990 . 0 \C- AUG31'90 \\\(?‘ ()- 0 9 r .4- -0 --- 0 0 A, 47414r2„ Kodiak Island Borough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 AUG31'90 R6215000001 EGGERTS EN, ER IC RO SE Y Po. BOX 682 KODIAK AK 99615 _q. V- y el a FDRWARDINO IttlE Ervf5ERTsir..1,1 vowi.c4v6pAY c4-1 ; t ; KooXAK F 59Ells RETURN TO SENDER . . : . •' • ; S " 0 2 5 - REO ..■ K1 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: RE: Kodiak Island Borough MEMORANDUM September 12, 1990 Planning and Zoning Commission Community Development Department Information for the September 19, 1990 Regular Meeting Public Hearing Item VI-L Case 90-058. Request for a variance from Section 17.17.050.A.1 and B. (Yards) and 17.17.060 (Bililding Height Limit) of the Borough Code to permit the completion • of a partially constructed single-family residence which encroaches no more than eleven (11) feet into the required twenty-five (25) foot front yard setback and no more than one and one-half (1.5) feet into the required fifteen (15) foot side yard setback and which projects fifteen and one half (15.5) feet beyond the thirty-five (35) foot height restriction of the RR1--Rural Residential One Zoning District. Lot 7, Block 4, Island Vista Subdivision. 1802 Marmot (Cliff and Evelyn Davidson) Twenty-eight (28) public hearing notices were distributed on August 31, 1990. Date of site visit: 1. Applicant: 2. Land Owner: . Existing Zoning: 4. Zoning History: 5. Location: Physical: Legal: Case 90-058 August 21, 1990 Cliff Davidson Cliff and Evelyn Davidson RR1--Rural Residential One The 1968 Comprehensive Plan identifies this area as Unclassified. Zoned to RR--Rural Residential by Ordinance 80-9-0. Rezoned to RR1--Rural Residential One by Ordinance 83-15-0. 1802 Marmot Lot 7, Block 4, Island Vista Subdivision Page 1 of 9 P & Z: September 19, 1990 6. Lot Size: 7. Existing Land Use: 8. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: Public Hearing Item VI-L 43,352 square feet Single-family residential North: Lots 8 and 9, Block 4, Island Vista Subdivision Use: Single-Family Residential Zoning: RR1--Rural Residential One South: Lots 5 and 6, Block 4, Island Vista Subdivision Use: Accessory Zoning: RR1--Rural Residential One East: Tract L, Mountain View First Addition Use: Vacant • Zoning: RR1--Rural Residential One West: Lots 2 and 9, Block 2, Island Vista Subdivision Use: Single-Family Residential and Single-Family Residential with Apartment • Zoning: RR1--Rural Residential One. 9. Comprehensive Plan: The 1968 Comprehensive Plan does not address this area in the "Year 2000 Land Use Plan". 10. Applicable Regulations:, The following sections of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Borough Code and the Kodiak Island Borough Coastal Management Program are applicable to this request: 17.17.050 Yards. A. Front Yard. Case 90-058 1. The minimum front yard shall be twenty-five feet, unless a previous building line less than this has been established, in which case the minimum front yard for interior lots shall be the average of the setbacks of the main structures on abutting lots on either side if both lots are occupied. 2. If one lot is occupied and the other vacant, the setback shall be the setback of the occupied lot plus one-half the remaining distance to the required twenty-five foot setback. Page 2 of 9 P & Z: September 19, 1990 Public Hearing Item VI-L • 3. If neither of the abutting side lot or tracts are occupied by a structure, the setback shall be twenty-five feet. B. Side Yards. The minimum yard required, on each side of a principal building, is fifteen feet. The minimum side yard required on the street side of a corner lot is fifteen feet. In the case of lots served by water and sanitary sewer service from a certified public utility or municipal system, the minimum side yard required is ten feet. The minimum side yard required on the street side of a corner lot is ten feet. 17.17.060 Building height limit. The maximum height of residential buildings shall not exceed thirty-five feet. COASTAL MANAGEMENT APPLICABLE POLICIES Residential Development 1. Location In areas with poorly draining soils, development where feasible shall be connected to a sewer line. Where this is not feasible, onsite facilities shall be designed so as not to cause conditions that will pollute rivers, lakes, and other water bodies, including the ground water supply. Consistent: Yes. Development of on-site wastewater disposal systems are required to meet the standards established by the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation. 2. Open Space Case 90-058 Green areas and open space shall be retained to the maximum extent feasible and prudent when land is subdivided. Consistent: Not applicable. This action does not involve land subdivision. Page 3 of 9 P & September 19, 1990 r - 3. Access Public Hearing Item VI-L New subdivisions or other residential developments on the shoreline shall provide usable public access to and along the shoreline, extending the length of the development, to the extent feasible and prudent. Consistent: Not applicable. This lot is not located along the shoreline. 4. Hazardous Lands Development shall not occur in hazardous areas such as avalanche runout zones, active floodplains, and high water channels to the extent feasible and prudent. Siting, design, and construction measures to minimize exposure to coastal erosion, mass wasting and historic tsunami run-up shall be required to the extent feasible and prudent. Consistent: Not applicable. This lot is not located in a know hazardous area. 5. Wetlands Filling and drainage of water bodies, floodways, backshores, and natural wetlands shall be consistent with ACMP Standards 6 AAC 80.070 (Energy Facilities) and 6 AAC 80.130 (Habitats). Consistent: Not applicable. This action does not involve any filling or draining of water bodies, floodways, backshores, or natural wetlands. COMMENTS This request is intended to permit the continued construction on a partially built structure for which the department has no documentation. The property owner says that the building was begun prior to the advent of the current zoning regulations and that it met the codes in existence at that time. Since the department has no documentation, the burden of providing evidence is on the property owner, to show that a dwelling was legally developed, in order to be allowed to complete the structure in its present location and configuration. Case 90-058 Page 4 of 9 P & Z: September 19, 1990 Public Hearing Item VI-L The Borough Code requires a house that is destroyed (or otherwise incomplete) to an extent of more than fifty (50) percent of its replacement value it must be rebuilt in compliance with the current codes. The applicant in this case feels that the conditions on the lot are such that it would be easier to justify a variance for the structure than to try to research the necessary building history. In preparing this case for Commission review, staff overlooked the encroachment of the structure into the side yard setback as shown on the attached as-built survey. The encroachment is slight, only one and one-half (1.5) feet into a fifteen foot side yard setback. Technically, this could require scheduling a second public hearing after sending out a corrected public hearing notice. Staff believes however, that this encroachment is subsidiary and incidental to the primary request for variance of front yard and building height requirements. Provided that suitable findings are included in support of the approval, staff feels that this whole case may be decided by the Commission at the public hearing that has already been scheduled. Staff will include a motion for each option at the end of this staff report. Suggested findings for the granting of a variance should be considered as applicable to the side yard setback issue as well as the front yard setback encroachment. In order for the Commission to grant a variance, all of the following conditions must be satisfied. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or intended use of development, which generally do not apply to other properties in the same land use district. The exceptional circumstances applicable to the intended use of the development on this property, which generally do not apply to other lots in the same land use district, is the existence of a significant drainage area that crosses the middle of the lot. The drainage flows towards the rear of the lot and due to its location, requires that development on Lot 7 be located towards the front of the lot where access is available. In order for the applicant to realize the reasonable use of the land that others in the RR1--Rural Residential One Zoning District enjoy, the applicant has located the structure within the required front and side yard setbacks of the lot. In addition, because of the limited amount of arable land for development at the front of the lot, the applicant has built to a higher elevation than the Borough Zoning Code permits in this district. Case 90-058 Page 5 of 9 P & Z; September 19, 1990 Public Hearing Item VI-L 2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would not permit the completion of the single-family dwelling unless it can be shown that the structure was legally located on the lot at the time construction was begun, or, that it can now be finished for less than fifty (50) percent of the replacement value. This is a practical difficulty as the department has no record of the project on file and it would be more costly and time consuming to try and assess the value of construction necessary before the structure can be completed. Denial of the variance would be an unnecessary hardship as there is really no better location for the development of a dwelling on the lot. The additional floor area of the proposed dwelling that, if afforded by a variance of the height requirements of the district, is reasonable in order to compensate for the relative lack of accessible, developable lot area elsewhere on the property. 3. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare. Granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare. The completed superstructure has been a local landmark for many years and staff has not documented any complaints or problems with that location since the initial construction. In fact, if the property owner could show that the structure is a legal nonconforming structure where it is presently located, it could remain where is, as is, indefinitely. To permit the property owner to finish the structure (to the standards of the UBC) would be an improvement to the neighborhood in terms of aesthetics and perhaps property values as well. The cupola noted on the as-built survey does not add usable floor space to the structure and therefore is considered an architectural feature. For this reason it is not considered in the calculation of building height for this case. Case 90-058 Page 6 of 9 P & Z: September 19, 1990 Public Hearing Item VI-L 4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The 1968 Comprehensive Plan does not address this area. Granting of the variance will not permit an increase in development density over the other dwellings located in this particular area and zoning district. 5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance. The actions of the applicant may have caused the conditions from which relief is being sought by variance, however, staff believes that the applicant would have requested a variance previously if they had understood that it was necessary. 6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the district involved. Single-Family Dwellings are a permitted use in the RR1--Rural Residential One Zoning District. RECOMMENDATION Staff finds that this request does meet all the conditions necessary for a variance to be granted under Chapter 17.66 (Variance) of the Borough Code. APPROPRIATE MOTIONS Should the Commission agree with the staff recommendation, the appropriate motion is: Move to grant a variance from Section 17.17.050.A.1 and 17.17.060 of the Borough Code to permit the completion of a partially constructed single-family residence which encroaches no more than eleven (11) feet into the required twenty-five (25) foot front yard setback and which projects fifteen and one half (15.5) feet beyond the thirty-five (35) foot height restriction of the RR1--Rural Residential One Zoning District on Lot 7, Block 4, Island Vista Subdivision; and to adopt the Case 90-058 Page 7 of 9 P & Z: September 19, 1990 Public Hearing Item VI-L findings contained in the staff report dated September 12, 1990, as "Findings of Fact" for this case. If the Commission agrees that a variance for the side yard setback is subsidiary and incidental to this overall variance request, the appropriate motion is: Move to grant a variance from Section 17.17.050.B of the Borough Code to permit the completion of a partially constructed single-family residence which encroaches no more than one and one-half (1.5) feet into the required fifteen (15) foot front yard setback of the RR1--Rural Residential One Zoning District on Lot 7, Block 4, Island Vista Subdivision; and to adopt the findings contained in the staff report dated September 12, 1990, as "Findings of Fact" for this case. FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. The side yard encroachment of the structure on Lot 7, Block 4, is subsidiary and incidental to the more significant projections into the front yard and beyond the height limit in the RR1--Rural Residential One Zoning District. 2. If the Commission grants a variance for the front yard encroachment and the overall height projection of the structure it is doubtful that a variance would be denied for this minor side yard encroachment, making a second public hearing more or less redundant. 3. Since there is no structure developed on adjoining Lot 6, Block 4, Island Vista Subdivision, the minor encroachment into the side yard by the structure located on Lot 7 will have no effect surrounding development. If the Commission feels that a variance for the side yard setback encroachment is not subsidiary and incidental to this overall variance request, the appropriate motion is: Case 90-058 Move to schedule an additional public hearing for the regular Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on October 17, 1990, to decide a request for a variance from Section 17.17.050.B of the Borough Code to permit the completion of a partially constructed single- family residence which encroaches no more than one Page 8 of 9 P & Z: September 19, 1990 Public Hearing Item VI-L • and one-half (1.5) feet into the required fifteen (15) foot front yard setback of the RR1--Rural Residential One Zoning District on Lot 7, Block 4, Island Vista Subdivision. Case 90-058 Page 9 of 9 P & Z: September 19, 1990 AS — ( ,if SURVEY, SURVEY R <RTIFdCATE 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1 HAVEJUURVEVEODFTifEAL.QWINO DESCRIBEO PROPERTY: LO VISTA SUBDIVISION PER PLAT 4 -29, IN THE KODIAK RECORDING DISTRICT, KODIAK ALASKA AND THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS SITUATED THEREON ARE WITH- IN T HE PROPERTY LINES AND DO NOT OVERLAP OR ENCROACH ON THE PROPERTY LYING ADJACENT THERETOTHAT NO IMPROVEMENT, ON PROPERTY LYING ADJACENT THERETO EN- CROACH ON T116 PREMISE, IN QUESTION AND THAT THERE ARE NO ROADWAYS, TRANSMISSION LINES, OR OTHER VISIBLE EA EMENTS ON SAID P,ROPERTY EXCEPT AS INDICATED HEREON tt A , t THI,tZ ' ' )AY OF AV. - U PREPARED DVI HORIZON LAND SURVEYING INC. P.0. 'BOX 1945 KODIAK ALASKA 99615 ( 907 ) 486 -6506 OF 4 •i: *r l Fi• d .O7 29'24" H.230.00 L.J0.00 LOT 8 HOUSE VERTICAL. DETAIL RD SCALE VERTICAL DATA ASSUMED 0,00' Case 90 -058 Lot 7, Blocs 4, Island Vista Pubic notice Area Minimun of 350 feet from exterior lot lines r KOMIAK ISLAND BOROtH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Public Hearing Item L PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE A public hearing will be held on Wednesday, September 19, 1990. The meeting will begin at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska, before the Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission, to hear comments, if any, on the following request: Case 90-058. Request for a variance from Section 17.17.050.A.1 (Yards) and 17.17.060 (Building Height Limit) of the Borough Code to permit the completion of a partially constructed single-family residence which encroaches -no more-than-eleven (1-1-) feet-into the required-twenty=five-(25)-foot-front yard setback and which projects fifteen and one half (15.5) feet beyond the thirty- five (35) foot height restriction of the RR1--Rural Residential One Zoning District. Lot 7, Block 4, Island Vista Subdivision. 1802 Marmot (Cliff and Evelyn Davidson) If you do not wish to testify verbally, you may provide your comments in the space below, or in a letter to the Community Development Department prior to the meeting. This notice is being sent to you because our records indicate you are a property owner in the area of the request. If you have any questions about the request, please feel free to call us at 486-5736, extension 255. V I ( 5 On A bev3 Mailing Ad : SR_ 2055 inC11 rYt D Your Name: N Your property description: Lo-E. g , ELK 2 Llari4 -Suk. Comments: i , iThi- / --Pcivf)r, var,.el ric4 - /1-72 i n y eft ( IS e, ) a -0_(_; Yr"-f )2e. -Se-Lin, 4,i', pre.e-CAnde --6 i r t'IleCS ,J Is 'Ir'r.-..e-t re-% 10( A.-; le! n 61-r) A 2x3,.., ,..) Eep SEP ' 9 TY D WEPT P141F.eNT AS—BUILT- URVEY 44.1 SURVE-fORS CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE SURVEYED THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY t LOT 7 BLOCK 4 OF THE ISLAND VISTA SUBDIVISION PE PLAT 74-29, IN THE KODIAK RECORDING DISTRICT, KODIAK ALASKA AND THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS SITUATED THEREON ARE WITH- IN THE PROPERTY LINES AND DO NOT OVERLAP OR ENCROACH ON THE PROPERTY LYING ADJACENT THERETO,THAT NO IMPROVEMENTS ON PROPERTY LYING ADJACENT THERETO EN- CROACH ON THE PREMISES IN QUESTION AND THAT THERE: ARE NO ROADWAYS, TRANSMISSION LINES, OR OTHER VISIBLE EA EMENTS ON SAID PROPERTY EXCEPT AS INDICATED HE EON AT. T141 CeiDAY OF AkA.\.."'"A ‘•••91/4"/ 1 SCAL I" 4 EGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR IDATE JULY 26th 1990 o• PP • ' 1GRAVEL DRIVE 4-47. .2 eb.G.s`C No"' ---, LS:074'2824" R=23a00 L.=30.00 •••••••■•■, PREPARED BY: HORIZON LAND SURVEYING INC. P.O. 'BOX 1945 KODIAK ALASKA 99615 ( 907 ) 486-6506 4.1k:46"tagill 4,e or A4 ■% ..... otsa. Jr, T 11 * • J) 03 CO 0 tki LOT 6 19.2 ( FOUR STORY WOOD FRAME HOUSE WOODEN DECK HOUSE DETAIL r • 20' • DETAIL NORTH IS PLAT NORTH Lsa • TOP CUPOLA • TOP 41h FLOOR EL. 157.2 EL 148.5 MEAN GROUND HOUSE VERTICAL DETAIL NO SCALE VERTICAL DATA ASSUMED ■ • OUTH 00.00 Cliff and Evelyn Davidson P.O. Box 746 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Kodiak Island Borough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 September 4, 1990 Re: Case 90-058. Request for a variance from Section 17.17.050.A.1 (Yards) and 17.17.060 (Building Height Limit) of the Borough Code to permit the completion of a partially constructed single-family residence which encroaches no more than eleven (11) feet into the required twenty-five (25) foot front yard setback and which projects fifteen and one half (15.5) feet beyond the thirty-five (35) foot height restriction of the RR1--Rural Residential One Zoning District. Lot 7, Block 4, Island Vista Subdivision, 1802 Marmot Dear Cliff and Evelyn: Please be advised that the request referenced above has been scheduled for review and action by the Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission at their September 19, 1990 regular meeting. This meeting will begin at 7:30 p.m. in the Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska. Attendance at this meeting is recomm.ended. The week prior to the regular meeting, on Wednesday, September 12, 1990, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Conference Room (#121), the Commission will hold a worksession to review the packet material fcr the regular meeting. You are invited to attend this worksession in order to respond to any questions the Commission may have regarding this request. If you have any questions, please call the Community Development Department at 486-5736, extension 255. Sincerely, Patricia Eads, Secretary Community Development Department r KC IAK ISLAND BOROLiH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Public Hearing Item L PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE A public hearing will be held on Wednesday, September 19, 1990. The meeting will begin at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska, before the Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission, to hear comments, if any, on the following request: Case 90 -058. Request for a variance from Section 17.17.050.A.1 (Yards) and 17.17.060 (Building Height Limit) of the Borough Code to permit the completion of a partially constructed single - family residence which encroaches no more than eleven (11) feet into the required twenty -five (25) foot front yard setback and which projects fifteen and one half (15.5) feet beyond the thirty - five (35) foot height restriction of the RR1- -Rural Residential One Zoning District. Lot 7, Block 4, Island Vista Subdivision. 1802 Marmot (Cliff and Evelyn Davidson) If you do not wish to testify verbally, you may provide your comments in the space below, or in a letter to the Community Development Department prior to the meeting. This notice is being sent to you because our records indicate you are a property owner in the area of the request. If you have any questions about the request, please feel free to call us at 486 -5736, extension 255. Your Name: Mailing Address: Your property description: Comments: 1 7 12 Ccse 90 C58 _o: 7, B ocK 4, Island Visto Pub is 0 ce Area YinHui of 350 feet 2A rom eurior t lines R6125010010 MATHIEU,STEVEN E NIKI SR 2045 RIDGE CR KODIAK AK 99615 86125020010 DIEMER,RICHARO i. NANCY P.C. BOX 2699 KODIAK AK 99615 86125020020 STARK ETAL,TIMOTHY MILA COLEMAN SR BOX 2159 KODIAK AK 99615 R6125020030 SCHMELZENBACH ETAL, EVERT DONNA SCHMELZENBACH P.O. BOX 1920 KODIAK AK 99615 86125020070 FEJES ETAL,'rJILLIAM CHERYL NEWTON 2032 ISLAND CR KODIAK AK 99615 86.125020080 SUNDBERG,0AVID ST RT 1 BOX 2055 KODIAK AK 99615 R6125020090 TWOHY, PHILLIP & VICKI P.C. BOX 1842 KODIAK AK 996 ag ►�s MP'1 D .2311go HARVEYsLOLA P.O. BOX 3001 KODI AK PAULLI N, KENNETH 20605 OBIE WAY BEND R6125020100 AK 99615 R6125030050 OR 97701 R6125030060 S?WEARINGIN,BILLY BARB P.O. 3 0X 2149 KODIAK AK 99615 DUNIVENT,DAVID 1475 TOLUCA DR SAN BERNARDINO R6125040020 CA 92404 R6125040030 ISISHOP .*FRANK & VICTORIA P.O. BOX 2491 KODIAK AK 99615 MCLEAN, ROBERT P.O. BOX 3139 KODIAK R6125040040 AK 99615 86125040050 DAVIDSON ETAL,CH.ARLES ROSMARIE DAVIDSON • P.O. BOX 2097 KODIAK AK 99615 DAVI StJN,CLIFFORD PO4 BO K R6125040070 OGGIDANFORTH P 40. BOX 27 54 KODIAK AK 99615 R61 25040090 AK 99615 R6125040100 AK 99615 R6125040110 FOX DOP:IALD & I LV A P.0 BOX 2971 KODIAK AK 99615 R6215000001 EGGERTS EN/ ERIC £ ROSE Y P .0. BOX 682 KODIAK AK 99615 R6215000002 DAVI DS ON7C L IFF OR D/EVE LYN P .0. BOX 746 KODIAK AK 99615 R6215000003 99615 R6215 )010 SLUMAN /THERESA /fl TCfl I) V T rc CI 1 in LI 629 0 ST Li 202 ANCHORAGE AK 995—. 86215010020 GRAY,MARY & STEVEN AKA MARY KIRK P.0. BOX 3687 KOOI AK AK 99615 R6215010030 BUIE,WILLIAM & SUZANNE 1563 THREE SISTER iA Y KOOI AK AK 99615 R6215010040 JOHNSON sCHARLES & CONNIE P.0. BOX 813 KODIAK AK 99615 R6215010050 CHRISTIANSEN,CARL 11721 — 12TH NW SEATTLE WA 98177 R6215010060 ROGERS'TERRY & LINDA. 43464 SE PHELPS RD SANDY OR 97055 86225040060 THOMPS ON, RONALD 10765 SWEET CRK RD MAPLETON OR 97453 RELYEA *MARY P.O. BOX 2672 KODIAK R6225040070 AK 99615 r`rvit757 • [3..S----7(T7.7 / trig. Case 9C -058 Lot 7, Block 4, Island Visto Vinimum of 350 feet from exterior lot lines KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 710 MILL BAY ROAD, ROOM 204, KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 -6340, (907) 486-5736 The application fee for all items covered by this form Is fifty dollars ($50.00), except as otherwise noted. Cond/tlonal Use permits, Exceptions, and Variance applications also require the submission of a site pIan. Applicant Information Property owner's name: C1.4 •x. EVEL.YN DAVIDSON Property owners mailing address: City: KCbtP A Box '1 4( State: AK. Zip: 99(15 Horne phone: 1186-- Lift 5A Work phone: 486 -- 825-0 If applicable, Agent's name: Agent's mailing address: ` City: State: Zip: Home phone: Work phone: Property Information Legal Description: Lo-r 11 13 LOCK ti /SLAW:NISTA SUBb . PER PLAT 14_29 Present use of property: 0 '42c' i L a'i ij — %2Q -5(c /2Q-, a '.4 Proposed use of pro erty: : L, _ ff_ ►, , 1,6 10- ce2- 4, A .0 r� - / 4 - .,‹P s1 f „. • r kmi:ct � ic- .3 02 t/ , �2. , , Vo c& .2 I, the applicant/authorized agent, have Applicant Certification been advised of the procedures Involved with this request and have recieved a copy of the appropriate regulations.' .--)46p444.4-1.... Pi a,1 '9© Authorized Agent's Signature Date Property Owner's Signature Date STAFF USE ONLY ����. Code Section(s) involved: l(3- (1 656 A- 1 . (Y4 ' f;_ / . I (,o l%u.i 4t Conditional Use Permit Exception �_ Variance Other (e.g., Title 18 Review a• •e. ante requests, etc.) non -fee Items Zoning ch : nge rom to Application accepted: �, 7 - ,F /`/l to Staff signature D to accepted CASH RECEIPT Kodiak Island Borough 710 UPPER MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 -6340 PHONE (907) 486 -5736 RECEIVED FROM - 000 - 101 -10 -00 010 -000- 105 -01 -00 010 -000- 105 -06 -00 010 -000- 111 -61 -00 010 -000- 107- 17152 DATE - 198-t 040 - 000 - 371 - 11 - 00 040 -000- 371 -12 -00 010 -000- 368 -51 -00 010 -000- 322 - 11 -00 010 - 000 - 319 -10 -00 010 -000- 1 PROPERTY TAX, PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX, LIENS PERSONAL TAX, LIENS LAND SALE, PRINCIPAL LAND SALE, INTEREST SALE OF COPIES BUILDING PERMIT PENALTIES, INTEREST CLEARING CONDITIONS OF CHECK PAYMENTS PAYMENTS TENDERED BY CHECK FOR OBLIGATIONS DUE TO THE BOROUGH ARE SATISFIED ONLY UPON THE CHECK BEING HONORED. RETURNED CHECKS FOR ANY REASON RESTORES THE OBLIGATION AS UNPAID AND SUBJECTS THE PAYER TO ANY CHARGES, FEES OR OTHER LEGAL LIABILITIES AS MAY BE APPLICABLE. TOTAL CASHIER ®s PAYOR 1 1 PAYMENT MADE BY: 1 " I CHECK NO ❑ CASH (0'79' C OTHER FMO8- 511815