1992-06-22 Special MeetingRODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH
Special Assembly Meeting
June 22, 1992
A special meeting of the Kodiak Island Borough
Assembly was held June 22, 1992, in the conference
room in the Kodiak Island Borough Building, 710 Mill
Bay Road. The meeting was called to order at
12:07 p.m.
There were present:
Jack McFarland, Presiding
Betty Fitzjearl
Gordon Gould
Suzanne Hancock
Mike Milligan (arrived at 12:10 p.m.)
Mary Monroe
absent:
Gary Stevens
comprising a quorum of the Assembly; and
Jerome Selby, Borough Mayor
Donna F. Smith, Borough Clerk
Judi Nielsen, Borough Deputy Clerk
Assemblymember Stevens was out of town and asked to
be excused.
MONROE, moved to excuse
seconded by GOULD Assembl
Ymember
VOTE ON MOTION Stevens.
MOTION CARRIED
NEW BUSINESS
Unanimous voice vote
NEW BUSINESS
A. RESOLUTIONS
RESOLUTIONS
1. Resolution No. 92 -22 Authorizing the RESOLUTION
Acquisition of a Right -of -way Permit from
the State of Alaska for the Pasagshak River NO. 92 -22
Bridge.
If adopted, Resolution No. 92 -22 authorized the State
of Alaska to issue a right -of -way permit to the
Kodiak Island Borough to allow Pasagshak property
owners to construct a bridge across the Pasagshak
River.
Special Assembly Meeting
June 22, 1992
KIBS104771
SPECIAL MEETING
ROLL CALL
Volume XV
Page 179
GOULD, moved to adopt
seconded by MONROE Resolution No. 92 -22.
Presiding Officer McFarland declared his conflict of
interest and passed the gavel to Acting Presiding
Officer Monroe.
Mayor Selby explained that the State gave final
clearance for construction of the Pasagshak River
bridge if the right -of -way permit was accepted by the
Borough. He said the pilings would be placed in the
river bed, which was state owned property, and access
to the bridge was by private property on the north
end and Borough right -of -way property on the south
end.
Tom Hendel, Pasagshak property owner, spoke to the
fact that permits from the Alaska Department of Fish
and Game and the Department of Environment
Conservation were received. He said the right -of -way
permit was to be issued to the Borough instead of the
property owner association because of time
constraints. He recited the planned construction
schedule if the permit was accepted.
Assemblymember Milligan discussed alternatives if the
Assembly did not adopt the resolution because
construction of the bridge was a private venture.
Jack McFarland, Pasagshak property owner, explained
that the property owner association had funds
available to build the bridge and waiting a year
caused the cost of construction to increase. He
noted that monies were from the association of
approximately 50 property owners. He reiterated the
thought that expedition of the permitting process was
viable if the Borough adopted the resolution.
Assemblymember Milligan and Mr. McFarland discussed
land use by the public and private residents.
Assemblymember Fitzjearl did not understand Borough
acceptance of the right -of -way permit when the bridge
was private and accessed only by residents who
contributed funds. At her question of the effect on
future development, Mr. McFarland explained that
future residents had options to buv -in to the project
and gain rights to use the bridge.
Assemblymember Gould asked Joel Bolger, Borough
attorney, if the Borough could tie liability in with
property so that it became part of the property.
Special Assembly Meeting
June 22, 1992
KIBS104772
Volume XV
Page 180
Joel Bolger said it would be possible with the
signature of all property owners. He felt that if
the property owner association assumed obligation for
the liability, care needed to be taken that the
association had financial substance. He foresaw a
problem with accepting liability of a few and
cautioned setting a precedent.
Mayor Selby recommended adding language to relieve
the Borough of all responsibility within a year.
Tom Hendel noted that the subdivision was platted and
approved in 1979 for access by air or water and that
a platted right -of -way was designated. He came
before the Assembly two years ago asking for the
formation of a service district, which the Assembly
denied. He restated the fact that Borough acceptance
of the right -of -way permit allowed expeditious
construction of the bridge. He emphasized that it
was the intent of the association to apply for
private non - exclusive permits as soon as possible,
eliminating Borough involvement. He reiterated the
fact that the proposed bridge did not change the
current public access.
Assemblymember Monroe admired the property owners'
endeavor to formulate a plan to meet the needs of
their property.
Indications were that the property owner association
pursued and was assured that liability insurance
coverage could be secured.
Scott Arndt felt that Borough acceptance of the
permit allowed property owners the opportunity to
construct the bridge.
Mr. Bolger assured the Assembly that Borough
involvement would terminate within one year when the
association received the permits from the State.
Assemblymember Milligan questioned the certainty that
the permit would be issued by the state within a
year.
Mr. Hendel revealed his conversation with Mike
Sullivan, DNR, in which Mr. Sullivan outlined the
permitt;
for a public comment n period. Mr. Hendel s announced
that the allowed construction period would expire
prior to thirty days. He again emphasized that
Borough involvement in the permit was temporary.
Special Assembly Meeting
June 22, 1992
KIBS104773
Volume RV
Page 181
Mr. Bolger explained that the permit could be limited
to one year.
Assemblymember Gould was of the opinion that
government should not interfere with private
industry.
VOTE ON MOTION
Ayes:
Noes:
Monroe
Fitzjearl, Gould,
Hancock, Milligan
Abstain: McFarland
Absent: Stevens
MOTION FAILED 1 Aye, 4 Noes
2. Resolution No. 92 -23 Disposing of Kodiak RESOLUTION
Island Borough Interest in a Right -of -way NO. 92 -23
Permit to Aid in the Construction of the
Pasagshak River Bridge.
If adopted, Resolution No. 92 -23 transferred Borough
interest in the use of the Pasagshak River right -of-
way to the individual, corporation, or firm selected
to construct and erect the Pasagshak River bridge.
FITZJEARL, moved to adopt
seconded by GOULD Resolution No. 92 -23.
VOTE ON MOTION
Ayes: None
Noes: Gould, Hancock,
Milligan, Fitzjearl,
Monroe
Abstain: McFarland
Absent: Stevens
MOTION FAILED Unanimous
Acting Presiding Officer Monroe passed the gavel back
to Presiding Officer McFarland.
Special Assembly Meeting
June 22, 1992
KIBS104774
Volume XV
Page 182
3. Resolution No. 92 -24 Authorizing the Lease RESOLUTION
of the Kodiak Island Borough Apartment
Building Complex Building "A" to NO. 92 -24
g
Non - Profit Corporations. Qualified
If adopted, Resolution No. 92 -24 authorized the
leasing of various apartments located in Building "A"
of the Borough Apartment Complex on a yearly basis
with five (5) automatic extensions.
MONROE, moved to adopt
seconded by FITZJEARL Resolution No. 92 -24.
Mayor Selby explained that the space would soon be
vacated and that leasing office space to non - profit
corporations generated revenue.
VOTE ON MOTION
Ayes:
Hancock, Milligan,
Monroe, Fitzjearl,
Gould, McFarland
Noes: None
Absent: Stevens
MOTION CARRIED Unanimous
4. Resolution No. 92 -25 Amending Resolution RESOLUTION
No. 92 -06 Fees of the Kodiak Island
Borough. NO. 92 -25
If adopted, Resolution No. 92 -25 amended Resolution
No. 92 -06 by adding fees for residential and
accessory building construction. The building permit
fees were omitted from the original fees resolution.
The fees were the same as the Uniform Building Code
fees.
GOULD, moved to adopt
seconded by MONROE Resolution No. 92 -25.
VOTE ON MOTION
Ayes:
Noes: None
Absent: Stevens
MOTION CARRIED Unanimous
Special Assembly Meeting
June 22, 1992
Milligan, Monroe,
Fitzjearl, Gould,
Hancock, McFarland
KIBS104775
Volume XV
Page 183
B. OTHER OTHER
1. Legal Action on Reapportionment. REAPPORTIONME,,_
Mayor Selby explained that the newly drawn
reapportionment lines defined districts that were not
indigenous.
Borough attorney, Joel Bolger, was asked to respond
to questions from the Assembly. He said the State
intended to file a petition for review immediately
and cross - complaints could be filed. He indicated
the Supreme Court would hear briefings on Wednesday.
He emphasize that any decision by the Assembly to
involve the Borough needed to be done immediately.
He felt the strongest objection would be formation
with the Southeast Islands. He reiterated he would
need to file with the Supreme Court today.
GOULD,
seconded by MONROE
VOTE ON MOTION
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
MOTION CARRIED
MONROE,
seconded by GOULD
VOTE ON MOTION
MOTION CARRIED
There being no further business to come before the
Assembly, the meeting adjourned at 1:35 p.m.
ATTEST:
o°,
orough Clerk
Special Assembly Meeting
June 22, 1992
moved to bring legal
action to attack
Supreme Court plan and
to bring briefing to
Supreme Court.
Monroe, Fitzjearl,
Gould, Milligan,
McFarland
Hancock
Stevens
5 Ayes, 1 No
moved to adjourn
Unanimous voice vote
KIBS104776
ADJOURNMENT
Volume XV
Page 1 °4