2009-11-18 Regular Meeting --�'
KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH
• DEC 222009 I
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISS • I E
REGULAR MEETING MINUTES BOROUGH CLERK'S OFFICE
November 18, 2009 Assembly Chambers
CALL TO ORDER
CHAIR KING called to order the November 18, 2009 regular meeting of the Planning and
Zoning Commission at 7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Commissioners present were Dave King, Brent Watkins, Casey Janz, Bill Kersch, Alan Torres,
and Lori Ryser. Absent was Jennifer Vickstrom.
COMMISSIONER JANZ MOVED to excuse Jennifer Vickstrom.
VOICE VOTE ONMOTIONFAILED UNANIMOUSLY
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
COMMISSIONER TORRES MOVED to approve the November 18, 2009 Planning & Zoning
agenda.
VOICE VOTE ON MOTION CARRIED UNA NI M O USL Y
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
COMMISSIONER JANZ MOVED to approve the September 16, 2009 Planning & Zoning
Regular Meeting Minutes
VOICE VOTE ON MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSL Y
AUDIENCE COMMENTS AND APPEARANCE REQUESTS
There were no audience comments and appearance requests.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A) Case 10 -002. Request a review of Case 87 -022, per KIBC 17.200.060, requesting a
modification to an existing conditional use permit (Communications Facility /Radio
Tower) to permit an additional 50 foot tower and antennas to co- locate with existing
facilities. Located in the C- Conservation zoning district and legally described as a portion
of the West ' Southwest ' Southwest ' , Section 31, T17S R19W, Seward Meridian on
Pillar Mountain, a portion of US Survey 3945. The location is U.S. Survey 3945,
Communications site # 2 and it is zoned C- Conservation. The applicant is Aksala
Electronics, Inc.
Cassidy gave a brief staff report stating this is a routine request and staff recommends approval.
COMMISSIONER WATKINS MOVED to renew a conditional use permit, according to KIBC
17.200 (Conditional Use Permits) and 17.50.040.H (Conditional Uses), to permit an additional
50 foot tower and antennas to co- locate with existing facilities, subject to three (3) conditions of
approval, and to adopt the findings of fact contained in the staff report dated April 20, 2009, as
"Findings of Fact" for Case 10 -002.
The public hearing was opened &closed: There were no public comments.
Commission discussion
November 18, 2009 P &Z Minutes Page 1 of 9
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. The color of structures and equipment will be subdued to blend in with the natural
surroundings, and natural vegetation immediately surrounding the constructed facilities will be
preserved to the maximum extent possible to preserve visual aesthetics.
2. Should the site be abandoned due to future advance of communications technology or
development of alternative communications facilities, the site will be cleared within one (1) year
of abandonment and returned to a natural state.
3. Should the exterior of the facility require modification to accommodate new or different
equipment, which would substantially alter the visual impact of the facility, the Planning and
Zoning Commission will review the modifications at a public hearing prior to the
implementation of such changes.
FINDINGS OF FACT
17.67.05 A. That the conditional use will preserve the value, spirit, character and integrity
of the surrounding area.
This use, as well as similar communication and utility facilities have existed in this area for many
years without conflicts. Conditions of approval suggested to address aesthetic and visual
concerns will preserve the value, spirit, character, and integrity of the surrounding area. Natural
vegetation will be maintained around the facility. Colors of structures and dishes should be
subdued to the extent possible and necessary. If the facility is abandoned, the site will be
cleared of equipment and structures and returned to a natural state. Any change of technology
that would require new or different equipment that would change the essential visual character
of the site or safety characteristics of the operation of the facility must be reviewed and
approved by the Commission at public hearing prior to installation.
17.67.05 B. That the conditional use fulfills all other requirements of this chapter pertaining
to the conditional use in question.
Based on the site plan and supporting documentation, it appears that the conditional use will
fulfill all other requirements of code. The site is above groundwater recharge areas and natural
vegetation is required to be preserved to the maximum extent possible.
17.67.05 C. That granting the conditional use permit will not be harmful to the public
health, safety, convenience and comfort.
The facility will be constructed and maintained in accordance with all applicable federal, state,
and local requirements. All construction will meet standards of the Uniform Building and Fire
Codes, and communication equipment will be installed and operated in conformance with
applicable FCC regulations.
17.67.05 D. That sufficient setbacks, lot area, buffers or other safeguards are being provided
to meet the conditions listed in subsections A through C of this section.
The site is well separated by topography and vegetation from residential areas. Natural
vegetation will be maintained as a condition of approval to preserve, to the extent feasible, the
i visual continuity of the
ROLL CALL VOTE ON MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSL Y
B) Case 10 -003. An appeal, in accordance with KIBC 17.220, of an Administrative Order to
Cease and Desist an unlawful use in a RR1 - Rural Residential One Zoning District.
Appellant is challenging the declaration that he is conducting a commercial rock quarry
operation on a parcel zoned for residential use in violation of KIBC 17.15.080 but is involved
November 18, 2009 P &Z Minutes Page 2 of 9
in the incidental removal of rock in preparation for home construction. Lot 13A, Block 1,
Monashka Bay Subdivision. The location is 2949 Bay View Road and it is zoned RRl -Rural
Residential One. The appellant is Merle W. Brown.
COMMISSIONER TORRES MOVED to reverse the decision of the Community Development
Director, per the Notice of Violation/Cease and Desist Letter dated August 19, 2009, that the
resource extraction on Lot 13A, Block 1, Monashka Bay Subdivision, be allowed to continue as
part of the site preparation for residential development, provided that a new zoning compliance
permit is applied for and obtained for the continued development.
The appeal hearing was opened & closed: Representing staff, Duane Dvorak gave a staff report.
Testimony given in support of the appeal was the appellants, Merle and Gloria Brown; Leslee
(Zeloof) Baker; Richard Baker; and Scott Arndt. Given opposing testimony was Elizabeth
Eufemio (call in); and Chris Campbell. Rebuttal was given by Merle and Gloria Brown.
During discussion, there was consensus that this lot that has been excavated to an approved
permit grade and level, there's a building permit that the borough voided for foundation work,
there is no substantial and continuous rock sales for which no extraction fees should be
expected, and the commission would like to see Brown be able to finish building his house.
ROLL CALL VOTE ONMOTIONCARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
COMMISSIONER WATKINS MOVED to postpone the findings of fact for case S10 -003 to the
sixteenth of December regular meeting of the Planning & Zoning Commission.
ROLL CALL VOTE ON CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
COMMISSIONER TORRES MOVED to recess for 10 minutes.
VOICE VOTE ONMOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
CHAIR KING reconvened the meeting at 9:10 p.m.
CHAIR KING announced that COMMISSIONER JANZ left the dais due to being involved in
the following case.
C) Case 10 -006. An appeal, in accordance with KIBC 17.220.O10B, of an Administrative
Order declaring that the homeowner is exceeding the standards of a home occupation in
accordance with KIBC 17.25.090 A -F and to discontinue an unlawful use (vehicle repair);
And the homeowner has established and is maintaining a junkyard that exceed the
standards of KIBC 17.25.110. Lot is located in the RR1- Rural Residential One zoning
district. Lot 4A, Block 4, Bells Flats Subdivision. The location is 10742 Chiniak Drive and it
is zoned RR1 -Rural Residential One. The appellant is Richard Graves.
COMMISSIONER TORRES MOVED to grant the appeal and reverse the Notice of Violation
dated August 24, 2009.
The appeal hearing was opened and closed: Representing borough staff, Bud Cassidy gave a staff
report. Given testimony in support of the appeal was the appellant, Lucelia Graves; Greg Egle;
Melody Schauf; Fred Waltman; Randy Fisher; Murray Zimmer; and Darren Asuncion. Given
testimony in opposition was Casey Janz. Rebuttal was given by Lucelia Graves.
During discussion, it was the consensus that the lot had been significantly cleaned up and
improved and continues to be moving in the proper direction. All commissioners expressed
concern with the borough code.
COMMISSIONER WATKINS MOVED to recess for 10 minutes.
VOICE VOTE ONMOTION TO RECESS CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
November 18, 2009 P &Z Minutes Page 3 of 9
s
1 CHAIR KING reconvened at 10:30 p.m.
1
In response to CHAIR KING'S inquiry of what the consequences are if this appeal is overturned
and if there will be a fine Cassidy stated any decision that you make can be appealed by either
party.
In response to COMMISSIONER TORRES' inquiry regarding if there are any monetary fines or
anything if this appeal is overturned Cassidy stated what needs to be determined is in what
state is the condition of the property in today. There has been a fair amount of cleanup but the
question is does the cleanup meet the standards of the code. It's the inoperable vehicles, parts,
and tires and such that are outside.
In response to CHAIR KING'S inquiry who and how is it determined if it is junk Cassidy stated
staff's role is we have to make a stand but what is operating today may not be tomorrow but
that's a call staff has to make.
It was the consensus that it is a poorly written borough code but it is the code and we have to
rule on the existing code.
COMMISSIONER WATKINS expressed if we follow the code every construction site for every
building project in town is in violation because all the material is junk.
COMMISSIONER RYSER and COMMISSIONER KERSCH also did site visits and found the
property to be much improved but we are here to discuss what the code rule is.
COMMISSIONER WATKINS stated he is having a hard time with a upholding the violation
when the borough is committing the same kind of violation with a bigger safety hazard in the
same area with the brush pile burying cars and garbage.
Cassidy said it is property controlled by the Womens Bay Fire Department and Womens Bay
Service District, and the borough is not directly involved with the property.
ROLL CALL VOTE ON MOTION CARRIED 4 -1. COMMISSIONER TORRES changed his
vote to aye. The ayes were COMMISSIONERS WATKINS, KING, TORRES, and RYSER.
The noe was COMMISSIONER KERSCH.
COMMISSIONER TORRES MOVED to postpone the Findings of Fact until the December 16
meeting.
VOICE VOTE ON MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
D) Case 10 -004. Request a Recommendation by the Parks and Recreation Committee of
proposed "RULES FOR BOROUGH PARKS." The location is various parks on the road
system. The applicant is Planning & Zoning Commission
Cassidy stated the Parks & Recreation Committee has received a number of complaints
regarding the misuse of borough parks. It started with late night parties, bonfires, garbage, and
vandalism at Mill Bay Beach Park. The committee agreed the rules should apply to other parks
as well and came up with common courtesy rules and requests they be posted at various
borough parks.
COMMISSIONER WATKINS MOVED to recommend to the Borough Assembly that "Rules for
Borough Parks" be adopted in a manner similar to other recreational rules.
1
The public hearing was opened and closed: Mike Sirofchuck, Parks & Recreation Committee
Chair spoke in support of the park rules.
During discussion, in response to COMMISSIONER WATKINS inquiry if there are any parks
where hunting is an overlapped use, Cassidy said he doesn't think so.
November 18, 2009 P &Z Minutes Page 4 of 9
H) Letter of Courtesy & Advisory - operating a B&B without operator residing on premises.
I) Letter of Courtesy & Advisory rescinding previous letter citing that the storage of fishing
gear was occurring without the presence of an owner occupied dwelling.
J) Letter of Courtesy & Advisory that property is being used as a food service concession in
violation of the R -2 zoning district.
K) Letter of Courtesy - Conversion of a business - use without a zoning compliance permit.
Cassidy stated this is representative of the kind of work we are doing from an enforcement
standpoint.
COMMISSIONER TORRES MOVED to accept reports as presented.
VOICE VOTE ON MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSL Y
REPORTS
A) Meeting Schedule:
• December 9, 2009 work session at 7:30pm in the KIB Conference Room.
• December 16, 2009 regular meeting at 7:30pm in the Assembly Chambers.
$ B) Planning Commissioner Training Report
C) Minutes of Other Meetings
• August 11, 2009 Parks & Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes
• September 15, 2009 Parks & Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes
• October 13, 2009 Parks & Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes
COMMISSIONER WATKINS MOVED to accept reports as presented.
VOICE VOTE ON MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSL Y
AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Petrina Peterson stated regarding the Earl subdivision Mr. Cassidy stated that the land remains
with the owner. The navigable water is public. The applicant then proposed the 40 foot public
access easement and will have a plat note for the rights of navigation. She saw it was noted on
the revised plat but one concern is on the preliminary plat. The land below the mean high water
would belong to the State and to that determination be made according to the staff report
regarding the Coastal Management Plan under Policy Hl- Protection of Recreation Resources
and Uses, the staff report said the consistency found that it was consistent. Peterson disagrees
because in the consistency being agreed with it says "the project is located on private land that
is not subject to public recreational activities, no closure or adverse impact to public waters is
anticipated as a result of this request." Looking further in the code it says access through water
bodies shall be maintained. In item #2 is "bridges must be constructed at least 4 feet above the
mean high water mark so she believes there is a conflict between the Coastal Management
applicable policies and the Alaska Statute 38.05.128 regarding obstructions to navigable water.
She gave handouts to Cassidy and the commission.
Vicki Kluever stated we have been waiting 4 hours to be heard. She flew in for this meeting and
can't attend the December meeting. Kluever said she appreciates the concern about if anyone
can make the next meeting but you didn't ask us. She thanked the commission for sitting and
listening to everyone's concerns. Kluever believes staff's recommendation to postpone was
premature because the appellant's reconsideration request made 4 specific comments about
errors on the plat and staff's recommendation to postpone was based on only one. The code is
vague in some areas and black and white in others and in this particular area she believes it is
very vague. The proposed plat has 31 discrepancies between directional and distances when it's
November 18, 2009 P &Z Minutes Page 6 of 9
compared to its original parent parcel. Those discrepancies may have led to discrepancy in total
acreage between the 6 proposed lots and the parent parcel which is 33 acres in round numbers.
In round numbers, those 6 proposed lots total 35 acres and that is a big discrepancy. The burden
of proof is on the surveyor and the surveyor made those mistakes so the burden of proof then
falls on the people who own those lots. You have potentially 6 owners and 2 adjacent owners;
potentially 8 parties that will end up in boundary disputes. Another point the appellant's made
was that 3 of the lots in the middle don't have the minimum width requirements. When you
enlarge those lots to make them meet the minimum width requirements something has to give
somewhere else which means the remaining 2 or 3 lots have to shrink. One of those lots is
already (inaudible). The burden of proof should not be on us.
Lila Schwantes stated at the last public hearing there was a plat submitted that we didn't have
the opportunity to review and the acreage was in excess of the amount that was supposed to be
contained in lot 3. It was in excess of 2 acres larger which this goes to criteria #1, a clerical error.
She also referred to KIBC 16.50.030 that states the requirement for all new subdivisions need to
have a boundary survey which has not been done. She feels if the surveyor had done this
accurately and according to borough code we wouldn't be here now. The boundary survey is
really critical and needs to be done. She also stated the map in the packet does not show that
this narrow passage way is part of the issue. Lastly, the survey done by St. Denny states that he
used the 1995 survey of Roy Ecklund and did not include the survey of the exterior boundary.
These 3 critical items need to be addressed.
Janet Wente stated her other Bells Flats neighbors insulted her tonight. A lot of us like to have
nice homes and look at the nice environment because it is beautiful in the Flats unless you look
really close at certain lots. Unfortunately, Janz has to look at it every day. When Wente picked
Janz up last week Wente seen from Janz driveway the same stuff sitting there that was sitting
there the month before, the month before that, and the month before that. From listening to the
commission she feels the commission voted against their own code tonight and she is
disappointed in that. The commission let all those people think that we're all content with the
status quo and we're not going to be moving forward (inaudible) better.
1 Tom Schwantes stated that this appeal (S10 -001 Reconsideration) should have been approved
and he's disappointed that the commission didn't hear it tonight. He feels there were mistakes
made at the last meeting when this was approved and he doesn't think all the information that
the commission should have had was given to them by the borough, specifically this section
16.50.030. The borough was obviously aware of that and it is stamped on the plat that requires a
boundary survey and it was not done, it states on the plat that St. Denny used the meander lines
from the 1995 survey. There's several documents that indicate that the mean high water is
somewhere between 7.6 (Army Corp of Engineers) and 8.1 (NOAA charts), and the State of
Alaska DEC information that says that particular area has a mean high tide of 8.1 foot.
Schwantes just received information from DNR that says "the Laurel L. Olsen native allotment
conveyance is bounded by the mean high water, this line as depicted in the 1980 BLM plat is a
crude approximation and in fact it was not based on a field survey but rather USGS quad maps.
The actual mean high water boundary is determined using survey procedures set out in the State
regulations and common law. I'm attaching a paper which explains the detail and the survey
should follow these as a minimum standard. It then goes on to say the Roy Ecklund survey of
1995 may have been done consistent with these procedures but it does not specify. I have not
analyzed the information in the letters to the borough, and then it says specifically these provide
insertions including photographs that the narrow area must be below mean high water." We
have been arguing all along that this area is below mean high water and that's what this says. He
feels it needs to be revisited. We've been in touch with Representative Austerman, Scott Ogen
with DNR, and Mr. Cox. Mr. Austerman is going to make a request to DNR to come in to do a
November 18, 2009 P &Z Minutes Page 7 of 9
In response to CHAIR KING'S inquiry of how the Parks & Recreation Committee would feel if
the commission added no shooting to the list, Sirofchuck stated he thinks the committee would
agree that shooting in parks is inappropriate.
COMMISSIONER WATKINS MOVED to amend the Parks Rules to include "no shooting."
PARK RULES
Exercise Safe, Courteous Behavior
Quiet Hours 10:00 p.m - 6:00 a.m.
Dispose of Trash Properly
No shooting
ROLL CALL VOTE ON MOTION TO AMEND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
ROLL CALL VOTE ON AMENDED MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
OLD BUSINESS
There was no old business.
COMMISSIONER TORRES MOVED to extend the meeting deadline until 11:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL VOTE ON MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
NEW BUSINESS
A) Request for reconsideration, per KIBC 16.90.010 A, of Case S10 -001. An approval by the
Commission of a preliminary plat according to KIBC 16.40, subdividing Native Allotment
AA7118, Parcel A, Lot 3, T2OS R21W, Sections 26 & 35, Seward Meridian and creating Lots
1 - 6, Laurel Louise Earl Subdivision. The location is Larsen Island Lot 3 and it is zoned C-
Conservation. The applicants are Martha Randolph, Lila Schwantes, and Myrtle Olen.
Cassidy stated he recommends the commission postpone this case. A State DNR surveyor, Mr.
Jennings has raised the issue of the technical issue of the determination of mean high water. We
were looking for evidence from another surveyor saying that the work previously done is in
error. Jennings led Cassidy to believe that there probably is an issue here. Cassidy encouraged St.
Denny to contact Mr. Jennings and until that discussion takes place Cassidy recommends
postponement.
COMMISSIONER TORRES MOVED to request to postpone the reconsideration of Case 510-
001 until the December 16 regular meeting.
ROLL CALL VOTE ON MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
COMMUNICATIONS
A) Letter of concern by landowner about the use of business zone land for an industrial use on
Near Island.
B) Request for a Zoning Certificate to clarify the zoning of a parcel.
C) Letter of Courtesy & Advisory - need for Zoning Compliance Permit for a residential
structure - Larsen Island.
D) Letter of Courtesy & Advisory - need for Zoning Compliance Permit for a residential
structure - Larsen Island.
E) Letter of Courtesy & Advisory - need for Zoning Compliance Permit for a residential
structure - Larsen Island.
F) Letter of Courtesy & Advisory - need for Zoning Compliance Permit for a residential
structure - Larsen Island.
G) Notice of Violation - Conversion of a four plex into a five - plex without a Zoning
Compliance Permit or building permit.
November 18, 2009 P &Z Minutes Page 5 of 9
Title Survey to establish mean high tide. That is the information that you should have had and
with that information this plat would not have been approved. He also said he is one of the Bells
Flats residents and he has to apologize to the commission for the remarks that were made this
evening.
COMMISSIONER WATKINS MOVED for a 15 minutes extension of the meeting.
VOICE VOTE ON MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
Susan Payne stated her and her husband support the appellant's issue of mean high water. It's
very important in the determination of lot size and as you have heard tonight there is some
discrepancy between the old plat and the new plat, 33 acres to 35 acres. It all bases on this mean
high water mark and everything under mean high water is State land so it's not borough land or
Laurel Earl's land. This was the preliminary plat that was handed out when the subdivision was
announced and this one was another that was sent out by email after that that, and her concern
now is that in this time this month he will put out yet another plat and we need to be able to
review the information on that. Please make sure that comes to us by mail or email. Another
issue is that her husband received a Letter of Courtesy & Advisory regarding the property at
Anton Larsen which we did not receive the letter via mail. We heard about it from borough
personnel and after we took care of that business we realized we didn't have a copy of the letter
so we got a copy via email from Martin Lydick. The letter says that we are C- Conservation
which we are not, we are RRl. The other people who received letters are in Conservation. Payne
said to be pro - active, Cassidy said these letters don't come out unless there is a complaint filed
and she feels that is not fair and requests the borough be more proactive in their notification for
requirements for remote properties. All properties should have received notice of what is
required when people are building on these remote properties and it should be sent out as a
piece of paper with our taxes or when the property changes hands. You could send out a notice
saying your remote property doesn't need a building permit but does need a zoning compliance
permit. You could also revise the language on the website under building permits where it says a
building permit is not required on remote property but it doesn't make any mention of a zoning
compliance permit. The City of Kodiak hands out a flyer about what your water, sewer and
garbage go to. She reiterated that this case is very important to them.
COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS
Bill Kersch agreed with Payne that mail is better. Tonight was a difficult night for all of us.
Lori Ryser said she learned a lot at the Planning Commissioner training and it's the type of
training you can go back to year after year and learn more from other community experiences.
She learned that we aren't the only ones with tough cases and issues with our codes. Tonight
was a tough night and a new experience as a commissioner.
Casey Janz said it has not been a pleasant evening. She encouraged the borough to look at the
complaint based enforcement because what she sees in the cases that we've had on many she
voted against the majority because it seems we apply the codes when it supports the person who
is having the complaint filed against them if they are building and constructing and moving
forward. It will be interesting to see the future of Bells Flats because she feels we just gave
license to load her up. Janz also said she learned a lot from the training in Anchorage and
appreciated going and also being on the Parks & Rec Committee.
Dave King said for the people from Anton Larsen to stay in touch with staff because he doesn't
think there will be much done on this case next month.
Vicki Kluever said there is an appeal (reconsideration) before your commission and if staff gets
involved with new information how does that impact the appeal and is that fair to the appeal.
November 18, 2009 P &Z Minutes Page 8 of 9
Cassidy stated what the commission has done is approve a preliminary plat and you folks have
read the code and Cassidy thinks they need to read it again because there are things in the code
that talks about approximate acreages. It doesn't require exact acreage so he has asked St.
Denny not to give him anything because right now we have approval on a preliminary plat not
new stuff he's given Cassidy. Even though Payne has one that was emailed out that was
probably before we said we can't accept any more information until the preliminary plat
decision is final. Your question is if I get new information from Scott Ogen or Jennings, we are all
trying to reach the same conclusion and that is the mean high water determination is going to be
critical in everything about that plat. We are looking for technical information that says that
either past surveys were either erroneous or they were fine during the time they were done that
a new mean high water determination has to be done. The critical thing is the mean high water
determination so if he gets that information he will pass it on to the commission because it's real
critical to the determination of lot size and boundary of the property.
Kluever said if it's that critical why doesn't the commission have the opportunity to rule on the
reconsideration decision. What has happened with the appellant's is they are in limbo right now
and the developer has the authority to move on.
Cassidy said the developer can't move on until we finalize this decision on the preliminary plat,
it's being reconsidered so it stops the process; it is stayed and can't move forward until this
determination of reconsideration is resolved.
Martha Randolph said if this new information drastically changes do we then go back to square
one and start all over.
Cassidy said that is the commission's decision but that's probably a recommendation is that the
plat as submitted is not a true representation and would be denied and start from square one.
Martha Randolph thanked the commission ss on understanding.
for their patience and understandin
p P g
ADJOURNMENT
COMMISSIONER TORRES MOVED to adjourn.
VOICE VOTE ON MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
CHAIR KING adjourned the meeting at 11:45 p.m.
KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
•
By:
David King, Chair
ATTEST
By: Chew Ors C'C S�nn�
Sheila Smith, Secretary
Community Development
November 18, 2009 P &Z Minutes Page 9 of 9