Loading...
2005-04-20 - Interviews - Seismic Valuation Minutes ~ ~ M~Y I: ~ :06~ ~ Architectural Review Board Interviews - Seismic Valuation 20 April 2005 5:30pm KFRC Conference Room BOROUGH CLERK'S OFFICE Present: Scott Arndt, Jerrol Friend, Gregg Hacker, Charlie Jerling, Jay Johnston, Brent Watkins. Absent: Mike Anderson. Also present: Gary Carver, Laura Kelly, Bud Cassidy, Ken Smith and Sharon Lea Adinolfi. Chairman Scott Arndt called the meeting to order at 5:35p. The Chair introduced Doug Hohbach and Jeremiah LeGrue from Hohbach-Lewin, Inc. D. Hohbach began the presentation, using power point, with Scope of Work - following the RFP Team Education/Experience - indicated consultants who will work with the team. Emphasized key person, project manager, Jeremiah LeGrue - Kodiak connected. Firm has a great deal of experience In seismic evaluation of schools - mostly in Calif/Ore. They would use FEMA methodology. They know strengths/weaknesses and would integrate methodology that would suit Kodiak's needs. Would prioritize retrofits - sensitive to disrupting classes. Showed slides of projects accomplished - use performance based design. Steps involved in applying for FEMA Planning Grant J. LeGrue went on to speak re seismic hazards Shows Project Overview -Retrofits need to be viable The firm will have experts look at planned retrofi ts before submittal to FEMA \\dove\Departrnents\EF\Projects\Architectural Review Board\Notes ARB Interviews 20 Apr 2005.doc Page 1 of 4 Want to work Objectives closely w/Borough to arrlve at Performance Life Safety or Immediate Occupancy Immediate Occupancy makes sense in the area because of the tsunami risk - need to collect Data E/F will scan info - helpful now and in the future Site visits should be fairly minimal Seismic Hazard Assessment Objectives - goes over steps of analysis Tier 1 Screening Objectives/Basics review Structural Checklists and Complete Nonstructural Checklists Reviews Tier 2 Evaluation assessment will be used here is where seismic hazard Develop Conceptual Retrofit - put together sketches - allows for good cost estimation Reviews Cost Estimation wants to provide a minimizes loss of use of building use local retrofits must be appropriate for Kodiak retrofit expertise that and D. Hohbach - Have to have mitigation plan in place w/FEMA before can apply for FEMA Project Grant. Speaks about approach to other avenues for monies. Review of benefit/cost analysis and Project viability. increase benefits and decrease costs Need to Shows Management Plan w/J. LeGrue as by various experts meetings written reports center of Project assisted regular Project updates Presentation concludes and the Chair poses list of questions. Presenters thank Board for opportunity. \\dove\Departments\EF\Projects\Architectural Review Board\Notes ARB Interviews 20 Apr 2005.doc Page 2 of 4 7:35p The Chair introduces Adam Ludwig of ABS and Bill Burgess representing the geotech side from Shannon & Wilson. Adam Ludwig begins presentation basic approach: identification, risk assessment, solution. hazard Firm is No. 1 in the country in risk management. experience in earthquake investigation. Goes over Team Organization Shows experience and education Gives brief rundown of FEMA grant people Project Objectives Evaluate current seismic risk to schools Explore options to mitigate risk Develop FEMA grant application Project Management - shows work flow program Performance objectives are important Geotech Approach Reviews Shannon & Wilson's background Alaska and in Kodiak good experience in Approach - research/ compile regional geology. all new info - review drawings and site visits Want to capture Adam Ludwig reviews ASCE3l-03 as basis for evaluation Performance Objectives Ground motion and structural Performance Levels - various Emergency Response Issues Structural analysis and nonstructural seismic evaluation need to be identified to develop mitigation alternatives FEMA Grant Assistance Cost benefit - a benefit is avoiding loss Benefit/Cost Analysis Conclusion and summary Question and answer period. Note: PML = probable maximum loss Ends at 9:45p \\dove\Departrnents\EF\Projects\Architectural Review Board\Notes ARB Interviews 20 Apr 2005.doc Page 3 of 4 Respectfully submitted: Date: ~ haron Lea olfi, Secretar KIB Engineering/Facilities De APproved.J'~ Lt-- S-C'o;r~ rl'1~ Scott Arndt, Chair Architectural Review Board Date: /YlQ u< ;;. 0/, ;J.<:JCJ.O ,/ \\dove\Departments\EF\Projects\Architectural Review Board\Notes ARB Interviews 20 Apr 2005.doc Page 4 of 4