Loading...
2005-03-29 Regular Meeting Minutes fiS) ~ (G ~ ~ \Yl [C rm lr\1 OCT 1 1 2005 lW Architectural Review Board 29 March 2005 7:00pm KIB Conference Room BOROUGH CLERK'S OFFICE A. Call to Order Chairman Scott Arndt called the meeting to order at 7:05pm. B. Roll Call Present were: Board Members Scott Arndt, Jerrol Friend, Gregg Hacker, Charlie Jerling and Brent Watkins. Absent Members were Mike Anderson and Jay Johnston. Also in attendance were Robert Tucker [KIBSD], Gary Carver and Laura Kelly. In attendance from the KIB ElF Department were Bud Cassidy, Ken Smith and Sharon Lea Adinolfi. The Chair asked for a motion excusing those Members absent. A motion was made and seconded to excuse absent Members. There was a unanimous affirmative voice vote. C. Approval of Agenda B. Watkins moved and G. Hacker seconded a motion to approve the Agenda. There was an affirmative unanimous voice vote. D. Approval of Minutes The Chair asked that a motion be made to approve the 3 sets of Minutes received at the previous meeting [10 May, 9 June and 14 Sept. 2004] and the Minutes for the 15 March 2005 meeting. B. Watkins so moved and G. Hacker seconded the motion. There was an affirmative unanimous voice vote. E. Review/Scoring of Proposals for Seismic Valuation B. Cassidy said that the proposals received were quality proposals and that at this meeting the Board would be tasked with scoring them and deciding upon a "short list". The short listed firms would then be invi ted to be interviewed by the Board. \\dove\Departments\EF\Projects\Architectural Review Board\Minutes ARB 29 Mar 2005.doc Page 1 of 2 The Chair asked Board Members, and the interested parties in attendance, to list their choices for a short list. After polling those present, the top five firms selected were: G&E Engineering Systems, Inc., Degenkolb, ABS, Coffman Engineers, Inc. and Hohbach-Lewin, Inc. In the Board would be interviewing the person. B. Cassidy responded firms' In the G. Carver asked representatives affirmative. if There was continued Board concurred In candidates. discussion re the interview process and the extending an invitation to the top 5 The Chair thanked all for their efforts in reviewing the Proposals. F. Scheduling of Next Meeting S. Arndt suggested the w/o 4/18/05 for interviews. Wednesday and Thursday evenings aside to accommodate all 5 firms. scheduling [20-21] were the set There was discussion re the interview procedure and what type of firm members should be part of the interview process. There was a consensus that the Board would like to be able to interview a structural engineer, a geotechnical person, a proj ect manager and a firm member who would be able to speak to funding [FEMA] issues. G. Adjournment The Chair adjourned the meeting at 7:47pm. Date, /I~?CS / Approved by: 5CClr~,,~ Scott Arndt, Chair Architectural Review Board Date: 9'- /?-ACJOS- \\dove\Departments\EF\Projects\Architectural Review Board\Minutes ARB 29 Mar 2005.doc Page 2 of 2