Loading...
2025-12-16 Work SessionKodiak Island Borough Assembly Work Session Assembly Chambers Tuesday, December 16, 2025, 6:30 p.m. Work Sessions are informal meetings of the Assembly where members review forthcoming programs of the borough, receive progress reports on current program or projects or receive other similar information from the manager. All discussions and conclusions are informal and there are no official actions taken. The Assembly also review the upcoming regular meeting agenda packet and request and/or receive information from staff. This work session is open to the public and will be broadcast on the Borough's YouTube Channel. Meeting packets are available online. Any public documents related to the agenda that are received and shared with elected officials after the initial agenda packet has been released will be included in the Supplemental Materials section below. The deadline for releasing supplemental materials is noon on the day of the meeting. Page 1. CITIZENS' COMMENTS 1-907-486-3231 or Toll Free 1-855-492-9202 (Limited To Three Minutes Per Speaker) 2. AGENDA ITEMS a. Community Pool Survey Update 4 - 102 Agenda Item Report - Pdf b. Assembly Review Of State And Federal CIP Lists 103 - 124 Agenda Item Report - Pdf C. Vehicle Registration Taxes Discussion 125 - 126 Agenda Item Report - Pdf d. Discuss Code Change Amending KIBC 3.55.025 To Allocate Part 127 - 131 Of The Sales Tax Proceeds From Tourism To Infrastructure Development Agenda Item Report - Pdf e. Discuss Election Code Change Whether To Allow Removal Of 132 - 139 Attestation On By -Mail Voted Ballots Agenda Item Report - Pdf 3. PACKET REVIEW The DRAFT regular meeting packet is available online at Kodiak Island Borough - Meeting Type List (civicweb.net). a. PUBLIC HEARING Page 1 of 149 • Ordinance No. FY2026-13, Accepting And Appropriating Funds From The 2020 Alaska Pacific Cod Federal Fishery Disaster Relief Distribution • Ordinance No. FY2026-14, Accepting And Appropriating Funds From The 2021 Chignik Salmon Federal Fishery Disaster Relief Distribution CONTRACTS • Contract No. FY2026-25, Landfill Scale Shack Platform Project With CCI Industrial Services, LLC • Contract No. FY2026-42, Port Lions School Emergency Fire Alarm Panel Replacement With Taylor Fire Protection In The Amount Of $169,292 • Contract No. FY2026-43, Borough Building Automation Services Agreement With Long Building Technologies • Contract No. FY2026-44, Kodiak Fisheries Research Center Long Building Technologies Building Automation Service Agreement ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION • Ordinance No. FY2026-16, Amending Kodiak Island Borough Code Chapter 5.01 Regarding Liquor Licenses To Clarify The Methods And Basis For Borough Protests For Issuance Of A New License, Renewal Of An Existing License, Transfer Of An Existing License, And Review Of The Continued Operation Of A License OTHER ITEMS • Confirmation Of Mayoral And Assembly Appointments To The Different Boards, Committees, And Commissions • Confirmation Of Assembly Appointment To The Womens Bay Service Area Board of Mr. Blake Strain • Declaring A City Seat Vacant On The Planning and Zoning Commission (Mr. Nick Mangini) • Declaring A Seat Vacant On The Architectural And Engineering Review Board (Mr. Victor Weaver) 4. MANAGER'S COMMENTS 5. CLERK'S COMMENTS 6. ASSEMBLY MEMBERS' COMMENTS 7. MAYOR'S COMMENTS 8. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS a KIB Draft Resolution -- FY 2026 & 2027 Federal Project Program 140 - 144 Page 2 of 149 Priorities Draft b Meeting Materials 145 - 149 This meeting is open to the public and will be broadcast on the Borough's YouTube Channel. Meeting packets are available online. Please subscribe to get meeting notifications when meeting packets are published. For public comments, please call (907) 486-3231 or (855) 492-9202. Page 3 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH STAFF REPORT DECEMBER 16, 2025 ASSEMBLY WORK SESSION SUBJECT: Community Pool Survey Update ORIGINATOR: Aimee Williams, Borough Manager RECOMMENDATION: DISCUSSION: The Kodiak Community Pool has faced ongoing issues with unexpected structural and mechanical repairs, evidenced by rust stains on interior tile surfaces, grout discoloration, and lifted drains, despite previous spot repairs. In 2023, the Borough hired Water Technology Inc. (WTI) for a comprehensive evaluation at the cost of $8,114.60, which identified needed repairs, but the Assembly chose not to proceed with building -wide repairs at that time. In January 2025, the Assembly directed the Manager and Staff to prioritize the project, leading to a proposal from Jensen Yorba Wall (JYW) for a more in-depth facility condition survey at a cost $59,540, involving site visits and collaboration with WTI, PND Engineers for structural review, and RSA Engineering for mechanical and electrical assessments. JYW and their team have completed the pool condition survey and have provided the final draft. In summary, the Kodiak Community Pool (constructed 2009) is experiencing widespread tile adhesion failure and water infiltration in wet areas, including the main pool room (natatorium). These issues have led to corrosion of structural elements, lifted drains, and deterioration of underlying concrete. Spot repairs have proven ineffective, and evidence suggests systemic waterproofing failure. Major Findings: • Tile Adhesion Failure: Extensive across natatorium and adjacent wet areas. • Water Intrusion: Causing corrosion in concrete, rebar, and metal components. • Drain Uplift: Floor drains lifting up to'/2", preventing proper drainage. • Potential Root Cause: Lack of waterproof membrane in original tile assembly and chemical exposure. Recommended Next Step: Before committing to a full-scale project, JYW suggests demolition and repair of a small, contained area. This small-scale project will allow the team to better diagnose the problem, test the repair approach, minimize risk of unforeseen structural failures, and obtain a better cost and time estimation for a building -wide project. JYW suggests the Lifeguard Room 111 (approx. 200 sq ft), which has a lifted drain and a large section of loose tile. Scope of Work: Remove entire title floor assembly and floor drain. Inspect underlying mortar and concrete for deterioration Replace with assembly designed to current best practices (including waterproof membrane, proper expansion joints, and epoxy grout) Kodiak Island Borough Community Pool Survey Update Page 4 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH STAFF REPORT DECEMBER 16, 2025 ASSEMBLY WORK SESSION Due to uncertainty about the desired direction, JYW and their team were unable to provide estimates for the proposed work. The Assembly's decision is needed to authorize either obtaining the updated cost estimates or this small-scale test repair, which will serve as a critical step in determining the feasibility, cost, and scope of a comprehensive facility -wide solution. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Take no action. 2. Direct Manager to obtain cost estimates for the small-scale project in Lifeguard Room 111 and return to Assembly for approval. 3. Direct Manager to approve proceeding with the design of the small-scale project to test repair in Lifeguard Room 111. FISCAL IMPACT: Funding Source: General Fund & Buildings and Grounds Cost estimates for the project large or small-scale are unknown at this time. OTHER INFORMATION: The final condition survey report was emailed for comments to the Architectural Review Board on November 12, 2025. Kodiak Island Borough Community Pool Survey Update Page 5 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. Kodiak School and Community Pool Condition Assessment October 2025 EMUF Jensen ENV] Yorba O©❑ Wall O©® Inc. Page 6 of 149 Community Pool Survey Update AGENDA ITEM #2.a. Table of Contents 1. General Items Table of Contents 1-1 Executive Summary 1-2 2. Pool Assessment 2-1 2a. Pool Executive Summary 2b. Introduction 2c. Methodology 2d. Updated Observations 2e. Recommendations 2f. Conclusion 3. Structural Assessment 3-1 3a. Introduction 3b. Background 3c. Observations 3d. Recommendations 4. Architectural Assessment 4a. Introduction 4b. Observations / Recommendations Mechanical Assessment 5a. Observations 5b. Recommendations 4-1 5-1 Appendix 5-1 Floor Plans (Appendix A) Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment — ToC & Executive Summary Page 1 1-1 Jensen Yorba Wall, Inc. October 2025 Page 7 of 149 Community Pool Survey Update AGENDA ITEM #2.a. Executive Summary Introduction The Kodiak School and Community Pool is a fairly new facility, with construction completed in 2009. A few years after construction was completed rust spots were observed on the side of the tiled pool tank wall. The first attempts to repair the issue were undertaken in 2017 by regrouting about half the tile in the pool tank. Unfortunately, the regrouting and subsequent patches and repairs have failed to stop the rust spots from growing. Recently, several areas of the tiled floor around the pool deck detached and further investigation revealed many more spots where the tile was no longer securely bonded to the floor even where it was not noticeably failing. Concerns about the condition of the Pool facility led KIB to hire Water Technologies, Inc. to perform an Aquatics Evaluation in 2023. After completion of the WTI report, KIB asked Jensen Yorba Wall to provide a full engineering and architectural Condition Survey of the entire building and its systems. In May 2025, an Architect from JYW, an Aquatics Specialist from WTI, a Structural Engineer from PND Engineers, and a Mechanical and Electrical Engineer from RSA surveyed the building and developed these attached reports. Condition Assessment Assumptions and Qualifiers The examinations of the JYW Team were non-destructive, so we did not look behind fixed finishes for hidden conditions. Given the recent construction of the Pool, the JYW Team did not include any testing for hazardous materials. Information about the building history, including operational history, was provided by Pool staff. Major Findings As detailed in the attached report sections, there appears to be a comprehensive waterproofing failure of the tile assembly on the walls and floors of the Pool and surrounding wet areas. The possible reasons for the failure are complex, perhaps overlapping, and difficult to diagnose. However, the clear results of the failure are that the tile is coming loose and water is infiltrating and damaging items below/beneath, including the structural walls and floors as well as the floor drains and piping. Given the large-scale nature of the failure, spot repairs of the tile are unlikely to solve the problems for long and may be hiding more serious degradation of the structural walls and floors. Although further investigation, including some destructive testing of walls, floors, and drains, will be needed to determine an exact solution, it seems likely that a full removal and replacement of the tile floor/wall assembly in all wet areas may be required to fully address the problem. Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment — ToC & Executive Summary Page 1 1-2 Jensen Yorba Wall, Inc. October 2025 Page 8 of 149 Community Pool Survey Update AGENDA ITEM #2.a. Next Steps Demolition and repair of a small, contained area which has the tile adhesion failure may help more fully diagnose the problems as well as test possible solutions. The Life Guard Room 111, adjacent to the Natatorium is approximately 200 sf and has a lifted drain as well as a large section of loose tile around a floor drain. A project which comprehensively removes and replaces the tile floor assembly and floor drain in this small room would provide valuable information about how, and whether, to proceed with a building -wide project. Condition Assessment Team Architectural Assessment and Project Management Corey Wall, AIA Jensen Yorba Wall, Inc. 522 W 101h, Juneau, Alaska 99801 corey@jensenyorbawall.com 907-586-1070 Pool Assessment Ryan Nachreiner, Project Director Water Technology, Inc. (WTI) 100 Park Avenue, PO Box 614, Beaver Dam, Wisconsin 53916 Structural Assessment Brian Nielsen, P.E., S.E. PND Engineers, Inc. 9360 Glacier Highway, Suite 100, Juneau, Alaska 99801 Mechanical Assessment Mark Frischkorn, P.E. RSA Engineering, Inc. 670 W. Fireweed Ln, Suite 200, Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Electrical Assessment Patrick Collins, P.E. RSA Engineering, Inc. 670 W. Fireweed Ln, Suite 200, Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment — ToC & Executive Summary Page 1 1-3 Jensen Yorba Wall, Inc. October 2025 Page 9 of 149 Community Pool Survey Update AGENDA ITEM #2.a. Executive Summary The Kodiak Island Borough Community Swimming Pool, located behind Kodiak High School in Kodiak, Alaska, serves as a cornerstone of community recreation and wellness. Water Technology, Inc. (WTI), in collaboration with Jensen Yorba Wall, conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the facility, aquatic elements, and mechanical systems in May of 2025. WTI has previously visited and assessed the swimming pool in 2023. The 2023 assessment assigned the facility an aggregated score of 76.88 out of 100, reflecting a generally good but aging condition. Key concerns included corrosion in the pool vessel concrete and rebar, worn tile grout, failing gutter waterproofing, rusted starting platforms and diving stand, and malfunctioning filter diaphragm valves. Recent maintenance efforts, including a 2024 closure for deck and pool finish repairs, gutter repainting, and filtration system upgrades, addressed some issues. In 2025, new starting blocks with adjustable kick plates, repainted diving stands, new filter valves, and glass filter media were installed, improving functionality and aesthetics. Despite these efforts, the 2025 evaluation revealed persistent and worsening issues. Corrosion in the pool vessel has expanded, with six documented areas, five in the deep end and one in the shallow area, indicating ongoing water intrusion and rebar corrosion. This threatens the structural integrity of the concrete pool vessel, necessitating urgent repairs. The pool's tile finish remains in good condition overall, but worn grout in several areas compromises waterproofing, requiring comprehensive replacement. Other critical components, such as corroded handrail anchors, pipe hangers, and an inaccurate flow meter, remain unaddressed. The pool recirculation pump lacks a variable frequency drive (VFD), leading to energy inefficiency, and a corroded water level control system in the surge tank risks operational disruptions. WTI's current recommendations prioritize immediate action to ensure safety, compliance, and operational efficiency: • Pool Vessel Concrete Repair: Demolish and replace concrete in corroded areas, removing compromised rebar and applying waterproofing membranes to prevent further deterioration. An alternative approach involves removing all pool tile to apply a comprehensive waterproofing layer, addressing potential weaknesses in the original construction. • Pool Tile and Grout Replacement: Replace chipped or cracked tiles and install non-metallic, non -shrink epoxy grout to restore waterproofing and durability. • Replace Handrail Anchors and Escutcheons: Address severe corrosion to ensure safety and structural integrity of handrails. • Install Pump Variable Frequency Drive: Optimize pump efficiency, reduce energy costs by up to 50%, and minimize mechanical stress. • Relocate and Calibrate Flow Meter: Ensure accurate flow readings to maintain water quality and comply with Alaska health regulations. • Replace Pipe Hangers: Mitigate risks of pipe failure due to corrosion, particularly in a seismically active region. • Replace Water Level Control System: Install a pool -specific sensor to maintain proper water levels, preventing equipment damage and ensuring compliance. These repairs, critical to extending the facility's lifespan, require a qualified aquatic contractor and detailed engineering specifications. Costs are estimated at $$$ to $$$. Proactive maintenance and asset management are essential to prevent sudden failures, optimize equipment longevity, and sustain the pool's role as a vital community resource. By addressing these issues promptly, the Kodiak Island Borough can ensure the facility continues to serve its diverse user base safely and effectively for years to come. Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Pool Specialist Page 1 2-1 Water Technology, Inc. Page 10 of 149 Community Pool Survey Update AGENDA ITEM #2.a. Introduction The Kodiak Island Borough Community Swimming Pool is a cornerstone of recreation and community life on Kodiak Island, Alaska. Located behind Kodiak High School, the facility stands as the culmination of decades of local effort. Designed for both competitive and community use, the facility features a 25-yard, six -lane pool with a deep end reaching 12 feet and a 1-meter diving board, a separate shallow learn -to -swim area, and a toddler wading pool. The pool vessel and gutters are constructed with concrete. The pool is filtered using three high -rate sand filters. The pool is disinfected with an in -situ salt chlorine generation system, and a back-up calcium hypochlorite feeder. The pH is balanced using carbon dioxide. Pool water heat is provided with a heat exchanger on the building boiler system. Accessibility was a priority, with ADA- compliant ramps, stair entries, and canal -like connection between shallow and deeper zones. Innovative systems like on - site saline chlorine generator and LIV sanitation were incorporated to improve water quality and reduce chemical handling. Notable design features include a mechanical heating and ventilation system with perimeter ducts under the pool decking that distribute air and heat through perforated interior cladding. These features earned the pool national recognition in 2011, including Aquatics International's "Best of Aquatics' and "Dream Designs" awards. Currently, the Kodiak pool remains a vital community resource, hosting lap swimming, swim lessons, water aerobics, high school practices, and family swims. It is ADA-accessible with a ramp and stair entry, making it inclusive for all community members. The facility also hosts the Kodiak Kingfishers youth swim club and Kodiak Masters Swimming. It serves a diverse user base, including high school students, families, and community groups, and supports programs like the Alaska Otter Babies, which teaches self -rescue skills to children as young as 8 months. Like any facility of its age, it faces ongoing maintenance challenges. The pool deck has developed major cracks, with exposed rebar and rust appearing on the tile surface, along with discolored grout and lifting drains. The pool vessel is also facing structural issues involving the tile pool finish and underlying concrete, with some areas exhibiting corrosion from the rebar beneath the surface. These issues are attributed to water penetration into the concrete which allowed moisture to reach the rebar and cause rusting. Compounding the problem, the original construction may have left the rebar too close to the concrete's surface, making it more susceptible to corrosion from even minor water intrusion. As a result, sections of the pool finish and vessel concrete need to be removed around each damaged area to repair the concrete and treat or replace the exposed rebar. Water Technology, Inc. (WTI) was commissioned by the Kodiak Island Borough in 2023 to report on the physical condition of the existing indoor pool. WTI visited the facility on February 28, 2023, and produced a condition evaluation report. Overall, the pool received a total aggregated evaluation score of 76.88 out of 100, indicating a generally good but aging facility with several issues needing attention. Major concerns include corrosion in some areas of the pool vessel, worn grout and waterproofing in the gutters, rusting starting platforms and diving stand, and failing diaphragm valves on the filters. WTI recommended immediate repairs —such as concrete restoration, tile and grout replacement, gutter waterproofing, handrail anchor replacement, installation of a variable frequency drive on the pump, relocation of the flow meter, and replacement of diaphragm valves —with estimated capital costs between $395,500 and $657,000 in 2023 dollars. Secondary recommendations included replacing corroded pipe hangers, starting platforms, the diving stand, and filter sand. The report emphasizes the importance of a proactive maintenance and asset management plan to extend the lifespan of equipment, improve efficiency, and prevent sudden failures. Long-term capital costs for critical components, such as pumps, filters, and disinfection systems, were forecasted based on typical lifespans and current conditions. In recent years, the borough has undertaken significant repairs, including a 2024 maintenance project to fix deck cracking and plumbing issues. The pool was closed for maintenance from May 6 to June 2, 2024, for deck finish repairs, pool finish repairs, filtration system work, and gutter repainting. In March 2025, the pool received six new starting blocks with adjustable kick plates and non-skid tops, replacing the original blocks from 2009. Other replacements include the repainted dive stand, new filter valves, and new filter media. Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Pool Specialist Page 1 2-2 Water Technology, Inc. Page 11 of 149 Community Pool Survey Update AGENDA ITEM #2.a. In 2025, WTI was commissioned by the Kodiak Island Borough, in conjunction with Jensen Yorba Wall, to revise and update the 2023 pool evaluation report. WTI visited the facility on May 20, 2025 to observe the current conditions, tour the pool and related amenities, and meet with staff to discuss operations. The purpose of this evaluation, led by Jenson Yorba Wall, is to provide a comprehensive survey of the pool's electrical, mechanical, and structural conditions WTI has revisited the present condition of the aquatic amenities and aquatic mechanical systems with a visual examination of the pool and associated mechanical equipment. This report outlines the present condition of the systems, equipment, and components, updates conditional changes and repairs from the 2023 report, and provides recommendations for future repairs or replacements. The following is a summary of the recommendations from the 2023 Report, changes to the facility observed in 2025, and updated recommendations based on this May 20, 2025 site visit. 2023 Recommendations Pool Vessel Concrete Repair Pool Tile Repair and Grout Replacement Pool Gutter Waterproofing Replace Handrail Anchors and Escutcheons Install Pump Variable Frequency Drive Relocate and Calibrate Flow Meter Replace Filter Diaphragm Valves Replace Pipe Hangers Replace Starting Platforms Replace Diving Stand Replace Filter Sand Methodology Status/Changes Current Recommendations Some Partial Repair Pool Vessel Concrete Repair Some Tile Repairs Pool Tile Repair and Grout Replacement Completed with Paint No Change Install Pump Variable Frequency Drive No Change Relocate and Calibrate Flow Meter Completed No Change Replace Pipe Hangers Completed Diving Stand Painted Completed Replace Water Level Control System WTI observed the condition of the aquatic elements at the facility. Aquatic elements include pool vessels, water features, pool filtration systems, pool circulation pumps, piping, valves and controls, and water treatment systems. Observations were conducted in a non-destructive manner and did not involve the removal of any structures or disassembly of any equipment. Included in the report are observations and indications of the condition of the accessible means of pool entry and exit. WTI has endeavored to identify problems with the means of access and potential non-compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Observations and evaluations included in this report do not constitute certification or verification of compliance with ADA requirements. ADA compliance is a legal opinion, and WTI is not able to anticipate or guarantee judicial interpretation with respect to a facility's legal compliance. WTI recommendations are based on a current understanding of the technical requirements of ADA regulations on aquatic amenities. Compliance with Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and Spa Safety Act (VGBA) regulations has not been verified or investigated as a part of this evaluation and report. Any statements regarding drains, suction fittings, or any other component pertaining to VGBA are preliminary observations only, and further inspection to substantiate compliance is necessary. The cost amounts associated with the recommendations provided are the opinion of WTI based on a professional understanding of market conditions. Cost amounts have not been trade or contractor verified and are intended only to provide guidance for a preliminary aquatic budget. All cost amounts are in current dollars; there has been no forecasting of future costs, and no escalation factors applied. Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Pool Specialist Page 1 2-3 Water Technology, Inc. Page 12 of 149 Community Pool Survey Update AGENDA ITEM #2.a. Updated Observations Pool Vessel Concrete 2023 Observation: The pool vessel is constructed of steel reinforced concrete. The interior of the vessel is finished with tile and water was in the pool at the time of observation. The pool vessel was constructed with a mechanical chase, or open space, around the exterior of the pool walls and below the pool deck; allowing visual inspection of the exterior of the pool vessel walls. Most of the pool vessel appears to be in good condition with little indication of cracking or shifting. However, at least two locations within the pool vessel interior have significant corrosion stains. This is an indication of water seeping through the concrete, reaching and corroding the steel reinforcement. This form of corrosion is a serious threat to the structural integrity of the pool vessel if left unanswered over time. On the exterior walls of the pool vessel, visible in the under deck mechanical chase, there are numerous small cracks in the pool vessel concrete. Most of these cracks appear dry and are typical of a concrete pool of this age. A few of these cracks have efflorescence indicating excessive moisture. Efflorescence is the deposit of crystalline salts on cementitious materials and is due to a chemical reaction where salts are dissolved from the porous concrete material and crystalize on the surface. In short, efflorescence is an indication of moisture in the concrete. By itself, efflorescence does not pose a threat to the structural integrity of the pool vessel. However, the moisture it is indicating, if excessive and continuous over time, can become a serious issue. Signs and symptoms accompanying efflorescence which should cause concern include: • Mold or mildew in the mechanical chase • Exposed rebar • Chipping and spalling None of the above symptoms appeared to accompany the efflorescence in the Kodiak pool. Therefore, the pool vessel should continue to be monitored, but no action is needed at this time. Most of the examples of the efflorescence were located high on the pool walls, adjacent to the perimeter gutter. The moisture causing the efflorescence may be migration of water due to the failure of the waterproof coating in the pool gutters, as discussed in more detail below. The worst instance of efflorescence appears to be below the pool deck, not associated with the pool vessel, and could be a result of failing deck drainage and/or deck finish. Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Pool Specialist Water Technology, Inc. Corrosion on the pool finish interior Cracking on the exterior of the pool wall Efflorescence on the exterior of the pool wall Page 1 2-4 Community Pool Survey Update Page 13 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. 2025 Condition and Update: The condition of the pool vessel with regard to corrosion on the interior pool finish has worsened since the 2023 report. The primary area of corrosion, Area #1, has increased in size, suggesting water intrusion and corrosion of the concrete rebar has continued and likely spread. There are also additional, but smaller, areas with corrosion stains on the pool tile, for total of six documented areas. Five of these areas are in the deep end of the lap lane area. The sixth and smallest corrosion stain is a small spot on the pool wall in the shallow area near the bottom of the stairs transitioning from the tot area to the shallow water area. Area #2 of Pool Vessel Corrosion Area #5 of Pool Vessel Corrosion Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Pool Specialist Water Technology, Inc. FF=7-111t�6A —, 11`1-11`. U V Area #1 of Pool Vessel Corrosion Area #3 and #4 of Pool Vessel Corrosion Area #6 of Pool Vessel Corrosion Page 1 2-5 Community Pool Survey Update Page 14 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. Pool Tile Finish 2023 Observation: The pool interior tile finish has some tiles that are chipped or cracked periodically, however, is in overall good condition. Based on the age of the grout and the leaking of water into the vessel concrete discussed above, the grout is likely at the end of its lifespan. 2025 Observation: The tile remains in good condition, with some limited areas of chipped or cracked tiles. The grout is worn, significantly in some areas and is due to be replaced. Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Pool Specialist Water Technology, Inc. I/11111111111 Chipped the at edge of gutter grating Worn and deteriorated grout Page 1 2-6 Community Pool Survey Update Page 15 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. Pool Gutters 2023 Observation: The pool gutters are constructed of concrete with perpendicular PVC grating. The interior of the gutter is waterproofed with a topical waterproof coating, believed to be BASF Thoroseal. Pieces of this waterproofing layer appear to be delaminating and are being found in the pump strainer basket. The waterproofing in the pool gutter appears worn, particularly when in contact with the gutter grating. In at least one location, rust was penetrating the back of the gutter as a result of the failure of this waterproofing coating. The PVC grating over the gutters is, in some places, severely stained with rust. This discoloration is only cosmetic; however, it is unlikely to be able to be removed through cleaning. Replacement of the grating is likely the only method of refurbishing the gutter grating. 2025 Observation: The interior of the pool gutters have been improved and the previous failing waterproofing coating has been replaced with a "marine paint." Efforts to clean the PVC gutter grating appear to have helped. A mild stain remains on some areas of the gutter, but overall condition is good. Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Pool Specialist Water Technology, Inc. Interior of gutter Stained gutter grating Page 1 2-7 Community Pool Survey Update Page 16 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. Starting Platforms 2023 Observations The pool includes six starting platforms on the deep end of the lap lanes. These starting platforms are single post, anchored into the pool deck and are showing typical wear for their age. There are mild to medium rust spots on the posts of the platforms and some bolts on the platforms are rusting. 2025 Observation: All six starting platforms have been replaced with new platforms. Platforms are placed in the original anchors in the pool deck. These anchors have medium corrosion and should be monitored. Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Pool Specialist Water Technology, Inc. Rusted bolts on starting platform top New starting platforms Starting platform anchors Page 1 2-8 Community Pool Survey Update Page 17 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. Diving Board and Stand 2023 Observation: The 1-meter springboard diving board and stand is located between lanes 2 and 3. The Durafirm board appears to be in good condition, however, the paint on the diving stand is chipping and peeling. Several areas have been repaired/repainted by staff. 2025 Observation: The 1-meter springboard diving stand has been repainted and appears to be in good condition. Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Pool Specialist Water Technology, Inc. I� A/ Nil) �;// Diving stand with chipping/peeling paint and repainted areas Repainted diving stand Page 1 2-9 Community Pool Survey Update Page 18 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. Handrails and SS Hardware 2023 Observation: The stainless -steel handrails and other hardware of the pool are in very good condition considering the corrosive nature of a salt water pool. Some mild corrosion exists, such as on the backstroke flag stanchions. Interestingly, several anchors and escutcheons are badly corroded, while their associated railings are not. 2025 Observation: Most of the handrail escutcheons and anchors are still corroded, some severly. Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Pool Specialist Water Technology, Inc. Stainless steel grab rails Badly corroded handrail anchor Corroded escutcheon and anchor Corroded escutcheon and anchor Page 12-10 Community Pool Survey Update Page 19 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. Pool Pump 2023 Observation The pool recirculation pump appears to be in good condition, without excessive noise or external heat. The pump is run at full capacity, without a VFD, and the flow is throttled back to approximately 50% of flow. Staff reports excessive water hammer when starting the pump. 2025 Observation: At the time of observation, the pool was drained, so the pump could not be observed in operating mode. However, it appears no changes have occurred with the pool recirculation pump. The pump does not have a VFD and is hydraulicly throttled. Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Pool Specialist Water Technology, Inc. 20 HP recirculation pump 20 HP recirculation pump Page 1 2-11 Community Pool Survey Update Page 20 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. Pool Piping and Valves 2023 Observation: The pool piping is PVC and appears to be in good condition. Piping at the influent of the Chlorine Generation system had apparently been leaking and has been repaired. Valves and couplings in piping system appear in good condition. Several pipe hangers are rusting and/or have paint peeling off. 2025 Observation: Several of the pipe hanger are still corroded with peeling paint. While this is a concern, the corrosion does not appear to have worsened significantly. Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Pool Specialist Water Technology, Inc. Pool piping and valves Corrosion and peeling paint on hanger Corroded pipe hanger Page 12-12 Community Pool Survey Update Page 21 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. Digital Flowmeter 2023 Observation: The pool flow is measured by a George Fischer Signet Flowmeter. During the site visit, the flow reading varied greatly, bouncing within a wide range. A low reading of 760 GPM was observed approximately one minute before a high reading of 1,242 GPM. Staff is aware the flowmeter sensor is located too closely to a piping elbow based on manufacturers installation instructions. This location is likely causing the range of readings and inaccuracy in the flow meter. If this low reading is used, as a worst -case scenario, for calculation of turnover, the pool is achieving a turnover of approximately 4.75 hours. 2025 Observation: At the time of observation the pool was drained and therefore no flow could be observed. However, the location of the sensor has not been changed and the flow reading accuracy is not reliable. Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Pool Specialist Water Technology, Inc. !-GF- Digital flow meter display Flow meter sensor Page 12-13 Community Pool Survey Update Page 22 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. Pool Filtration 2023 Observation: The pool filtration system is a three tank combination of horizontal sand filters. The tank bodies are multi -layered fiberglass intended to hold a bed of #20 silica sand media. The filters are connected to the pool system with diaphragm valves, which are operated by a backwash controller. The model filter at the Kodiak pool has filter bed size of 19 square feet and a maximum flowrate of 20 GPM. Each filter tank can handle up to 380 GPM of flow, for a total system maximum flowrate of 1,140 GPM. The high reading observed on the flow meter during the site visit exceeded this total system maximum flowrate. While this flow meter reading is likely an inaccuracy, any actual flow exceeding this rate can damage the filter and reduce filtration effectiveness. At the time of observation, the influent and effluent pressure gauges indicated an approximately 11 PSI difference. (The effluent pressure gauge is incorrectly labeled "Influent") This is approximately the differential level indicating backwashing is necessary. Staff reports the influent pressure after backwashing does not return to the initial levels of a clean filter. Common causes of not returning to initial influent pressure levels are: 1) Insufficient Backwashing — If the filters were not backwashed long enough, dirt and debris may not have sufficiently been flushed from the filter and remain after backwashing. The bed of sand is not being fully cleaned during the backwashing process. 2) Damaged Sand Bed — If the quality of the bed of sand is damaged in some way, a return to initial clean filter pressures may not be possible. Examples of a damaged bed of sand include: a. Compressed sand, often due to excessively high operating pressures b. Calcified sand, due to high calcium levels and deposits The diaphragm valves on each filter tank are leaking. Some type of topical waterproofing has been applied to the exterior of the valves to try to fix the leaks. The leaking is starting to corrode the bolts and nuts at the flanges of the valves. All three of the valves have failed in this same manner. 2025 Observation: At the time of observation the influent and effluent pressures could not be observed due to the drained pool. All three failing diaphragm valves have been replaced with new valves. Staff reports the filter sand media has been changed and glass media has been added. Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Pool Specialist Water Technology, Inc. Horizontal sand filters Failing filter valves New diaphragm valves Page 12-14 Community Pool Survey Update Page 23 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. Chlorine Generation System 2023 Observation: The primary disinfection of the pool is performed by a 4-unit TMI salt chlorine generator. The system uses electrodes in the pool water to convert the chloride ions from dissolved salt into hypochlorous acid through electrolysis. The system appears to be in good condition and is indicating working at full efficiency. Staff reports operating the salt content of the pool at 3,500 PPM to 4,800 PPM, which is slightly above the maximum (4,500 PPM) of this model of chlorine generator. Also, a Blue -White Pitot Tube flow meter on the chlorine generator bypass line indicates a flow of approximately 160 GPM, which is below the system cell maximum of 175 GPM. 2025 Observation: No changes are observed to the chlorine generation system. The system appears to be in good condition and operational. Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Pool Specialist Water Technology, Inc. TMI Chlorine Generation System TMI Chlorine Generation System Page 12-15 Community Pool Survey Update Page 24 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. Calcium Hypochlorite System 2023 Observation: The pool has a back-up, or secondary, disinfection system, which is necessary with in -situ chlorine generation as the capacity of the electrodes to produce • chlorine may not be able to respond to rapid load/contamination demands. The back-up disinfection at the Kodiak pool is an 18-pound capacity Calcium Hypochlorite feeder. The feeder and associated pump and valves appear to be in good working condition. The feeder is used infrequently, and staff maintain a low level of calcium hypochlorite on -hand. 2025 Observation: No changes are observed to the Cal Hypo back-up disinfection system. Staff reports the system continues to be used infrequently, which indicates the chlorine generation system is adequate and functioning well. Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Pool Specialist Water Technology, Inc. Cal Hypo Feeder Cal Hypo Feeder Page 12-16 Community Pool Survey Update Page 25 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. Carbon Dioxide System 2023 Observation: The pool water is chemically balanced with the injection of carbon dioxide gas. The CO2 is stored in pressurized cylinders and released into the pool water based on the pool chemical controller readings of pH. The cylinders are strapped to the wall both when in use and in storage. 2025 Observation: The carbon dioxide system experienced excessive consumption and staff replaced the distribution valve due to a leak. Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Pool Specialist Water Technology, Inc. Carbon Dioxide Tanks Carbon Dioxide System Page 12-17 Community Pool Survey Update Page 26 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. Ultraviolet Sanitation System 2023 Observation: Supplementary sanitation is provided by a Hanovia medium -pressure Ultraviolet radiation system. This system exposes the pool water to specific - doses of UV radiation, which assists in the inactivation of bacteria and I' pathogens and the breakdown of chloramines. The stainless -steel chamber is in excellent condition and there appears to be no indications, or staff reports, of failures of the internal wiping mechanisms or quartz sleeves. 2025 Observation: There are no apparent changes to the UV radiation system and it appears to be in good condition. Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Pool Specialist Water Technology, Inc. AT Hanovia UV unit i0o" 4V Page 12-18 Community Pool Survey Update Page 27 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. New Observations Water Level Control The water level control unit in the surge tank is severely corroded. Staff reports inaccuracies with the water level readings. While not confirmed, it appears a non -pool specific water level control was installed, making corrosion more likely. Corroded water level control Acid Magic Addition Staff has installed a chemical pump to enable the addition of a liquid acid to the pool system and is adding Acid Magic to help regulate pH and alkalinity in the pool water. Acid Magic is a brand of hydrochloric acid (muriatic acid) with other proprietary additives intended to reduce fuming and ease handling and storage.' Staff reports carbon dioxide injection is still the primary method of pH s. ` control, with the addition of Acid Magic as supplemental to adjust alkalinity. It is common for pools with carbon dioxide as the primary pH control method to occassionally need supplementation with acid. Liquid acid for pool balance Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Pool Specialist Water Technology, Inc. Page 1 2-19 Community Pool Survey Update Page 28 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. 2023 Recommendations Based on the observations in 2023, the following repairs or replacements are discussed below for the improvement of the aquatic center. Recommendations are divided into two priorities: First Priority and Second Priority. First Priority recommendations should be planned for immediate implementation and are needed, at a minimum, to allow the facility to operate more efficiently and effectively and provide a safe, healthy, and beneficial experience to facility users. Secondary Priority items are encouraged but may be deferred as they hold no significant threat to safety or operational efficiencies. Aquatic amenities and components have been observed and considered for recommendations for improvement. Elements of the facility beyond the aquatic components, such as site, building, and building mechanical components, are excluded from the analysis of this report. First Priority Recommendations: Pool Vessel Concrete Repair In the areas with rust/corrosion on the interior of the pool vessel, the pool vessel concrete should be demolished and replaced. The tile finish will need to be removed, and the concrete removed to expose the steel reinforcement. All corroded steel reinforcement should be removed until new steel can be tied into existing uncorroded reinforcement. Concrete should be replaced with waterstops where appropriate, and matching tile finish installed over the repaired area. Pool Tile Repair and Grout Replacement Any broken, cracked, or chipped tiles should be removed and replaced. The grout between the tile should be removed and new non-metallic, non -shrink grout installed to renew the waterproofing abilities of the tile finish. Pool Gutter Waterproofing The pool gutter topical waterproofing should be removed and replaced. The surge tank waterproofing should also be inspected and replaced. The surge tank waterproofing may likely also be failing, and pieces of the failed waterproofing from the gutter are likely collected in the surge tank. After removal of existing waterproofing layers, a new topical waterproofing should be applied to both the gutter interior and surge tank interior. Replace Handrail Anchors and Escutcheons Many handrail anchors and escutcheons are severely corroded. This increases unwanted metal ions into the pool water and brings the long-term structural integrity of the hand rails/grabra ils into question. This replacement could be considered a Second Priority, but the destructive nature of anchor replacement makes performing the replacement most appropriate when the pool tile/grout replacement and pool vessel concrete repair occur. Install Pump Variable Frequency Drive Using a valve to reduce the flow from a fully powered pool pump is a traditional means of optimizing flow of a pool system. However, the pump is expending much greater energy than is necessary for the system to operate properly. Modern variable frequency drives optimize the pump output, making valve throttling unnecessary and saving significant amounts of energy. Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Pool Specialist Water Technology, Inc. Page 1 2-20 Community Pool Survey Update Page 29 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. Relocate and Calibrate Flow Meter The flow meter is clearly giving inaccurate readings, likely due to the proximity of the sensor to a pipe elbow. The sensor should be relocated to a piping location with the manufacturer's recommended distance of straight pipe from any piping joints/elbows. Replace Filter Diaphragm Valves The diaphragm valves on each filter tank are insufficiently repaired for leaking. An external topical treatment for leaking on these components should not be a long-term solution. Failure of even one of these valves would leave the pool with insufficient filtration capacity and cause the shutdown of the pool until repairs are completed. The diaphragm valves should be replaced and seated in all new gaskets. Second Priority Recommendations: Replace Pipe Hangers Several pipe hangers are showing corrosion and peeling paint. This deterioration is not at a level where imminent failure is expected, but replacement should be anticipated. However, this report cautions that a seismic event may bring into question the urgency of this replacement. Replace Starting Platforms Starting platforms experience harsh conditions with competitive swimmers continuously washing the platforms in pool water with bather splashout. The starting platforms are beginning to show signs of rust and corrosion. Replacement, or at least future planning for replacement, should be considered as the corrosion will only worsen over time. Replace Diving Stand The diving stand, and specifically the epoxy paint, is not holding up well in this pool environment. Paint is chipping and peeling off in several spots, and repainting has already been performed in numerous other spots. While this does not appear to be due to structural corrosion, this failure is likely to continue. Replacement of the dive stand will likely become necessary. Prior to stand replacement, staff should continue to repaint failing spots with manufacturer recommended epoxy paint, which will help prevent corrosion and improve the aesthetics. Replace Filter Sand Based on staff feedback, the filter sand bed is likely less than optimally effective. A new bed of sand would renew the filtration efficiency of the system, remove worn or damaged sand, and help minimize contamination, and maintain a clean internal filter environment. Replacement of the sand should be projected for the near future. Sand is commonly removed by in-house staff, or by rented/hired vac truck. Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Pool Specialist Water Technology, Inc. Page 1 2-21 Community Pool Survey Update Page 30 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. Chan.Res and Updates In relation to each of the previous recommendations from 2023, the following are the observed status of the changes or updates to the facility. The status of each recommendation is based on staff reports or discussions, and/or observations from the May 20, 2025 site visit. Pool Vessel Concrete Repair In the areas with rust/corrosion on the interior of the pool vessel, the pool vessel concrete should be demolished and replaced. The tile finish will need to be removed, and the concrete removed to expose the steel reinforcement. All corroded steel reinforcement should be removed until new steel can be tied into existing uncorroded reinforcement. Concrete should be replaced with waterstops where appropriate, and matching tile finish installed over the repaired area. Status: Small areas of some of the worst spots of visible corrosion on the interior of the pool wall have been partially repaired. However, these repairs only involved removing small areas of tile replacement only, and did not remove pool concrete. The rebar continues to corrode, and the areas of visible corrosion have increased, including returning to the areas repaired. Pool Tile Repair and Grout Replacement Any broken, cracked, or chipped tiles should be removed and replaced. The grout between the tile should be removed and new non-metallic, non -shrink grout installed to renew the waterproofing abilities of the tile finish. Status: A few small areas have cracked or chipped tile needing replacement. The grout in some areas is very deteriorated. Overall the pool grout is in fair condition and should be replaced with new non -shrink, non-metallic epoxy grout. Pool Gutter Waterproofing The pool gutter topical waterproofing should be removed and replaced. The surge tank waterproofing should also be inspected and replaced. The surge tank waterproofing may likely also be failing, and pieces of the failed waterproofing from the gutter are likely collected in the surge tank. After removal of existing waterproofing layers, a new topical waterproofing should be applied to both the gutter interior and surge tank interior. Status: The interior of the gutter has been repainted with a "marine paint" and appears in good condition. It is unclear if the paint used is manufacturer approved for chlorinated environments. Replace Handrail Anchors and Escutcheons Many handrail anchors and escutcheons are severely corroded. This increases unwanted metal ions into the pool water and brings the long-term structural integrity of the hand rails/grabra ils into question. This replacement could be considered a Second Priority, but the destructive nature of anchor replacement makes performing the replacement most appropriate when the pool tile/grout replacement and pool vessel concrete repair occur. Status: The corroded handrail anchors and escutcheons are still recommended to be replaced. Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Pool Specialist Water Technology, Inc. Page 12-22 Community Pool Survey Update Page 31 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. Install Pump Variable Frequency Drive Using a valve to reduce the flow from a fully powered pool pump is a traditional means of optimizing flow of a pool system. However, the pump is expending much greater energy than is necessary for the system to operate properly. Modern variable frequency drives optimize the pump output, making valve throttling unnecessary and saving significant amounts of energy. Status: The pool recirculation pump remains unchanged on a motor starter with hydraulic throttling. Installation of a variable frequency drive is still recommended and would significantly reduce the energy consumption of the pool pump. Relocate and Calibrate Flow Meter The flow meter is clearly giving inaccurate readings, likely due to the proximity of the sensor to a pipe elbow. The sensor should be relocated to a piping location with the manufacturer's recommended distance of straight pipe from any piping joints/elbows. Status: The flow meter sensor is still located too close to a pipe elbow to provide accurate readings. The sensor should be moved to a new location with the manufacturer specified distance from any pipe fittings. Replace Filter Diaphragm Valves The diaphragm valves on each filter tank are insufficiently repaired for leaking. An external topical treatment for leaking on these components should not be a long-term solution. Failure of even one of these valves would leave the pool with insufficient filtration capacity and cause the shutdown of the pool until repairs are completed. The diaphragm valves should be replaced and seated in all new gaskets. Status: The filter diaphragm valves have been replaced. Replace Pipe Hangers Several pipe hangers are showing corrosion and peeling paint. This deterioration is not at a level where imminent failure is expected, but replacement should be anticipated. However, this report cautions that a seismic event may bring into question the urgency of this replacement. Status: The pipe hangers remain unchanged and corroded hangers are recommended for replacement. Replace Starting Platforms Starting platforms experience harsh conditions with competitive swimmers continuously washing the platforms in pool water with bather splashout. The starting platforms are beginning to show signs of rust and corrosion. Replacement, or at least future planning for replacement, should be considered as the corrosion will only worsen over time. Status: All six starting platforms have been replaced with new starting platforms. Replace Diving Stand The diving stand, and specifically the epoxy paint, is not holding up well in this pool environment. Paint is chipping and peeling off in several spots, and repainting has already been performed in numerous IwuIan rVU1 �VIIUIuVn r+oxoon�cn� - rvv� aNcuaux ragc c-c.� Water Technology, Inc. Page 32 of 149 Community Pool Survey Update AGENDA ITEM #2.a. other spots. While this does not appear to be due to structural corrosion, this failure is likely to continue. Replacement of the dive stand will likely become necessary. Prior to stand replacement, staff should continue to repaint failing spots with manufacturer recommended epoxy paint, which will help prevent corrosion and improve the aesthetics. Status: The diving stand has been repainted. Replace Filter Sand Based on staff feedback, the filter sand bed is likely less than optimally effective. A new bed of sand would renew the filtration efficiency of the system, remove worn or damaged sand, and help minimize contamination, and maintain a clean internal filter environment. Replacement of the sand should be projected for the near future. Sand is commonly removed by in-house staff, or by rented/hired vac truck. Status: Staff reports the filter sand bed has been replaced and glass media, or often referred to as Activated Filter Media, has been added. Glass media is an alternative filtration material used in swimming pool sand filters, made from finely crushed and processed recycled glass. Unlike traditional silica sand, glass media offers superior filtration. Glass media typically lasts twice as long as sand, with a lifespan of around 8 to 10 years, and is chemically inert, so it won't affect pool water chemistry. While it costs more upfront than traditional sand, many pool operators choose glass media for its enhanced clarity, reduced maintenance needs, longer service life, and environmental benefits, since it repurposes waste glass that might otherwise end up in landfills. Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Pool Specialist Water Technology, Inc. Page 12-24 Community Pool Survey Update Page 33 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. murrent Recommendation WTI observed the condition of the aquatic elements at the facility and have developed the following recommendations. Aquatic elements include pool vessels, water features, pool filtration systems, pool circulation pumps, piping, valves and controls, and water treatment systems. These changes, renovations, or repairs should be conducted in a timely manner as discussed below. An estimated probable construction costs has been provided for use in preliminary budgeting. Pool Vessel Concrete Repair $$$ In the areas with rust/corrosion on the interior of the pool vessel, the pool vessel concrete should be demolished and replaced. The tile finish will need to be removed and the concrete removed to expose the steel reinforcement. All corroded steel reinforcement should be removed until new steel can be tied into existing uncorroded reinforcement. Concrete should be replaced, with waterstops where appropriate, and matching tile finish installed over the repaired area. It is important to remove all corroded steel. The level of repair and areas necessary for demolition will be somewhat unknown until the removal of the vessel concrete is in progress. The repair contractor should take into consideration and have contingencies for a repair area beyond what is reasonably anticipated. The repairs should be completed by a qualified contractor with extensive experience with public/commercial swimming pools. A detailed design and specification should be developed by a qualified aquatic engineer for this repair. However, in general, the following should be performed: 1) Tile and grout on and around the area of corrosion should be removed. Care should be taken not to damage nearby pool finishes that are not being replaced. 2) Concrete under the tile should be examined for cracking or other means of water intrusion. Area should be photographed prior to further demolition. Damaged, cracking, or deficient concrete beyond the area of removed tile may indicate a larger repair area is needed. 3) Concrete in the repair area should be removed. Care should be taken not to damage nearby areas that are not being replaced. Concrete demolition may require stabilization or support of areas of the remaining concrete pool vessel during removal. Concrete should be removed to expose corroded rebar. All corroded rebar should be exposed until the point of connection with non -corroded rebar is found. This may result in the expansion of the necessary repair area. 4) Corroded rebar should be removed. New rebar should be installed and tied into the existing non -corroded rebar. New rebar should be installed to have a minimum of 2-inch concrete coverage on the waterside of the pool concrete. 5) Concrete should be replaced with new cast -in -place concrete or shotcrete with approved and qualified nozzleman. 6) A multi -component, factory prepared, anti-fracture/waterproofing membrane system comprised of a self -curing liquid rubber polymer should be applied to the concrete surfaces, such as ReclGard by Custom Building Products, Laticrete Hydroban by Laticrete International, or Mapelastic Aqua Defense by MAPEI Corporation. 7) Install new tile with cement mortar using a latex additive water emulsion added to Portland cement mortar. 8) Grout tile with factory prepared, 100 percent epoxy resin and hardener with sand or mineral filler material. Alternative Recommendation: $$$ There is a concern that the original construction did not involve any waterproofing of the concrete prior to tile installation and this lack of waterproofing treatment is contributing to the degradation of the concrete and concrete rebar. A more thorough repair of the pool vessel could involve complete removal Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Pool Specialist Water Technology, Inc. Page 1 2-25 Community Pool Survey Update Page 34 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. of all tile pool finish, waterproofing treatment of the now exposed (or replaced) pool vessel concrete, and replacement with new pool finish. Complete removal of all pool tile would allow for the installation of a new cementitious waterproofing membrane to provide further protection of the existing and new concrete and concrete rebar of the pool vessel. Aspects of this repair would be similar to the recommendation above: 1) All pool tile and grout in the pool should be removed. 2) Concrete under the tile should be examined for cracking or other means of water intrusion. Concrete should be photographed prior to further demolition. Damaged, cracking, or deficient concrete beyond the area anticipated for repair may indicate a larger repair area is needed. 3) Concrete in the repair area should be removed. Care should be taken not to damage nearby areas that are not being replaced. Concrete demolition may require stabilization or support of areas of the remaining concrete pool vessel during removal. Concrete should be removed to expose corroded rebar. All corroded rebar should be exposed until the point of connection with non -corroded rebar is found. This may result in the expansion of the necessary repair area. 4) Corroded rebar should be removed. New rebar should be installed and tied into the existing non -corroded rebar. New rebar should be installed to have a minimum of 2-inch concrete coverage on the waterside of the pool concrete. 5) Concrete should be replaced with new cast -in -place concrete or shotcrete with approved and qualified nozzleman. 6) A multi -component, factory prepared, anti-fracture/waterproofing membrane system comprised of a self -curing liquid rubber polymer should be applied to the concrete surfaces, such as RedGard by Custom Building Products, Laticrete Hydroban by Laticrete International, or Mapelastic Aqua Defense by MAPEI Corporation. 7) Install new tile with cement mortar using a latex additive water emulsion added to Portland cement mortar. 8) Grout tile with factory prepared, 100 percent epoxy resin and hardener with sand or mineral filler material. Pool Tile Repair and Grout Replacement $$$ Any broken, cracked, or chipped tiles should be removed and replaced. The pool grout between the tile should be removed and new non-metallic, non -shrink grout installed to renew the waterproofing abilities of the tile finish. The pool must first be completely drained and allowed to dry so that moisture does not interfere with the new grout's adhesion. A thorough inspection of the tiled surfaces should follow, identifying areas with missing, cracked, or deteriorated grout, and checking for loose or damaged tiles that may also require replacement. Once problem areas are marked, old grout is removed using manual grout saws, oscillating tools, or pneumatic equipment, ensuring all debris is vacuumed or blown out to leave joints clean and open. After old grout removal, the tile joints are cleaned with a mild acid solution or an appropriate alkaline cleaner designed for pool tile preparation, then thoroughly rinsed and left to dry. Proper surface preparation is critical to achieving a strong bond with the new grout. For regrouting, a pool -grade grout is mixed carefully according to the manufacturer's instructions; epoxy grout is preferred for its superior resistance to pool chemicals and heavy wear. The new grout is applied by pressing it firmly into the joints using a rubber float, making sure everyjoint is completely filled. Excess grout is wiped from the tile surface with a damp sponge as the work progresses, and the grout lines are tooled to create uniform, smooth joints. Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Pool Specialist Water Technology, Inc. Page 12-26 Community Pool Survey Update Page 35 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. Once the initial set is achieved, the tile surfaces are cleaned again to remove any grout haze. After curing, the pool should be refilled slowly to prevent damage from sudden hydraulic pressure, and water chemistry is carefully tested and adjusted, particularly pH, alkalinity, and calcium hardness, to protect the fresh grout. Finally, a detailed inspection should be conducted to identify and touch up any missed joints or imperfections, ensuring a durable and watertight finish that meets health and safety codes for public pools. Replace Handrail Anchors and Escutcheons $$$ Many handrail anchors and escutcheons are severely corroded. This increases unwanted metal ions into the pool water and brings the long-term structural integrity of the handrails/grabrails into question. Corroded handrail anchors in a swimming pool should be replaced promptly to maintain safety, structural integrity, and compliance with applicable codes. Over time, constant exposure to water and pool chemicals causes metal anchors to corrode, weakening their grip on the pool deck or surrounding surfaces. This corrosion can lead to loosened or unstable handrails, significantly increasing the risk of slips, falls, and serious injuries for swimmers entering or exiting the pool. Additionally, deteriorated anchors can create sharp, rusted edges that pose a direct hazard. From a maintenance perspective, allowing corrosion to progress can cause more extensive damage to the pool deck or surrounding concrete, resulting in more costly repairs later. Replacing corroded anchors not only restores the safety and stability of the handrails but also preserves the aesthetic appearance of the pool area, ensuring a secure and welcoming environment for all pool users. Install Pump Variable Frequency Drive $$$ Using a valve to reduce the flow from a fully powered pool pump is a traditional means of optimizing flow of a pool system. However, the pump is expending much greater energy than is necessary for the system to operate properly. Modern variable frequency drives optimize the pump output, making valve throttling unnecessary and saving significant amounts of energy. Installing a variable frequency drive (VFD) on a pool pump offers significant benefits in terms of energy efficiency, operational flexibility, and system longevity. By allowing the pump's motor speed to adjust precisely to the actual flow demands of the pool system, a VFD reduces unnecessary energy consumption, often cutting electrical costs by 30% to 50% compared to fixed -speed pumps. This efficiency comes from the physics of pump curves, where even a small reduction in speed can greatly reduce power draw. Additionally, a VFD enables smooth ramp -up and ramp -down of the pump, which minimizes water hammer and mechanical stress on plumbing and equipment, extending the life of both the pump and associated components. It also improves user control by enabling precise adjustments to flow rates for features like water slides, fountains, orvariable turnover requirements, helping facilities meet health code requirements while avoiding excessive wear. Finally, the quieter operation resulting from optimized speeds can significantly reduce noise levels in the mechanical area, enhancing the working environment for staff. Relocate and Calibrate Flow Meter $$$$ The sensor should be relocated to a piping location with the manufacturer's recommended distance of straight pipe from any piping joints/elbows. A properly located flow sensor and accurate flow meter readings are essential for the safe and effective operation of a public swimming pool. These devices monitor the flow rate of water circulating through the pool filtration and disinfection systems, ensuring it meets the required turnover rate to maintain water quality and swimmer safety. If the flow sensor is incorrectly placed, such as in a location with turbulence, air pockets, or poor pipe alignment, it can produce inaccurate readings, leading to either underestimation or overestimation of the actual flow. This can result in insufficient filtration and disinfection, allowing contaminants and pathogens to remain in the Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Pool Specialist Water Technology, Inc. Page 1 2-27 Community Pool Survey Update Page 36 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. water, or excessive flow that could damage equipment or waste energy. Accurate flow readings are also critical for compliance with health department regulations, as the State of Alaska requires proof that the pool water turnover rate meets minimum standards. By ensuring the flow sensor is installed in a straight section of pipe with stable flow conditions and regularly calibrating the meter, operators can trust the readings they use to adjust pump speeds, verify system performance, and document regulatory compliance, ultimately safeguarding public health and extending the life of the pool mechanical systems. Replace Pipe Hangers $$$ Several pipe hangers are showing corrosion and peeling paint. This deterioration is not at a level where imminent failure is expected, but replacement should be anticipated. However, this report cautions that a seismic event may bring into question the urgency of this replacement. When hangers are intact and properly secured, they keep the pipes aligned and prevent sagging, shifting, or vibrations that could lead to leaks, joint failures, or pipe bursts. In a pool mechanical room, where moisture, chlorine, and other corrosive chemicals are present, deteriorated or corroded hangers can fail without warning, causing pipes to drop or break, leading to flooding, equipment damage, and potentially hazardous working conditions. Replace Water Level Control System $$$ The water level control sensor should be replaced with a pool -specific continuous electronic water level sensor. A water level control sensor is essential in the surge tank to ensure the pool water level stays within the correct operating range, maintaining both safety and system efficiency. In a surge tank, water displaced by swimmers or added through splash -out and evaporation is balanced, and the sensor controls the automatic filling or draining of water to keep levels stable. A faulty or poorly maintained sensor can lead to overfilling, causing flooding and equipment damage, or low water levels, which can introduce air into circulation pumps, leading to cavitation, pump failure, or interruptions in filtration and disinfection processes. Maintaining the sensor in good condition helps protect expensive mechanical systems, ensures consistent skimming for effective debris removal, and supports compliance with public health regulations that mandate proper pool water levels for sanitation and bather safety. Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Pool Specialist Water Technology, Inc. Page 1 2-28 Community Pool Survey Update Page 37 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. Conclusion The Kodiak Island Borough Community Swimming Pool remains a vital recreational and social hub for Kodiak, Alaska, serving a diverse community through competitive swimming, swim lessons, and family -oriented programs. The 2023 and 2025 evaluations by Water Technology, Inc. (WTI), in collaboration with Jensen Yorba Wall, highlight the facility's overall good condition but underscore critical maintenance challenges due to its age and environmental exposure. While recent efforts, including deck repairs, new starting blocks, and filtration system upgrades, have addressed some concerns, persistent issues such as worsening corrosion in the pool vessel, deteriorated grout, and outdated mechanical components threaten the facility's safety, efficiency, and longevity. WTI's recommendations, encompassing comprehensive pool vessel repairs, tile and grout replacement, installation of a variable frequency drive, flow meter relocation, replacement of corroded handrail anchors and pipe hangers, and upgrading the water level control system, are essential to restore structural integrity and operational efficiency. These repairs, estimated at $$$ to $$$, require prompt action by qualified aquatic contractors to prevent further deterioration and costly future interventions. An alternative approach, involving full tile removal and waterproofing, could provide a more durable solution to underlying concrete issues. Implementing a proactive maintenance and asset management plan will be critical to extending the lifespan of equipment, ensuring compliance with health and safety standards, and maintaining the pool's role as a cornerstone of the community. By prioritizing these investments, the Kodiak Island Borough can preserve this award -winning facility for future generations. [END] Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Pool Specialist Water Technology, Inc. Page 1 2-29 Community Pool Survey Update Page 38 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. KODIAK POOL STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT 1. INTRODUCTION On May 19 and May 20, PND principal structural engineer performed a site visit to the Kodiak pool. The intent of the site visit was to provide an overall condition of the structure and identify any major issues with the structural elements that require a more in-depth investigation. Observations were limited to visual observations in areas that were readily accessible. Selective demolition to access concealed areas was not performed. Non-destructive and destructive testing were also not performed. Photos of observations are included in Appendix A. 2.BACKGROUND The Kodiak pool building was constructed in 2008 and 2009. The building is a one-story steel -framed structure with a partial basement and a mechanical plenum under portions of the pool deck. The foundation is a conventional reinforced concrete shallow foundation with strip and spread footings. The lateral load resisting system consists of steel deck shear walls and steel ordinary concentric brace frames. The structure was designed per the 2003 International Building Code. 3. OBSERVATIONS Intprinr Pool walls: The pools walls are cast -in -place concrete walls. The wall thickness is 10" at the main pool and 8" at the shallow pool. Tile was placed over a layer of mortar over the concrete walls. The thickness of the mortar is not known. There are eight areas where there is corrosion staining on the tile. Based on discussions with the owner, some of these areas of staining are new and others are getting more extensive. The worst area of the staining was at the north wall near Grid 2.5. Three corrosion stained areas were repaired around six years ago. We understand the repairs were to the tile only, not the underlying mortar or concrete. While onsite, it was noted that there were thin steel plates embedded in the concrete basement walls on Grid 6. These appear to be flat plate ties at the wall form joints. Flat plate ties by the wall form supplier, Ellis, were submitted by the contractor and approved by the design team. In construction photos, these appear to be visible throughout the pool walls and are spaced sporadically. Section 2AG of concrete specification 03300 includes the following requirements: 1. Furnish units that will leave no corrodible metal closer than 1 1/2 inch to the plane of the exposed concrete surface. Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Structural Page 1 3-1 PND Engineers, Inc. Page 39 of 149 Community Pool Survey Update AGENDA ITEM #2.a. KODIAK POOL STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT 2. Furnish ties that, when removed, will leave holes not larger than 1 inch (25 mm) in diameter in concrete surface. 3. Furnish ties with integral water -barrier plates to walls indicated to receive dampproofing or waterproofing. It does not appear that these specification requirements were followed. The staining is a sign of corrosion of steel in the concrete wall. The corrosion may be at the steel plate form ties, rebar, or tie wire. In numerous locations, there was corrosion staining in the gutters. Again, this is a sign of corrosion in the concrete. In this location, the corrosion is likely at the rebar. • The walls in the surge tank are cracked near several pipe penetrations. The cracks exhibit some efflorescence. • In construction photos, it was noted that the PVC waterstop was lap spliced in one area instead of a welded splice. This can result in an ineffective waterstop, which ultimately can lead to leaking of the pool. Owner has performed a bucket test to determine if the pool is leaking and based on the test they believe that it is not leaking. Pool floor deck at grade (west of Grid 6): The pool floor consists of 8" thick cast -in -place concrete elevated slab at the mechanical plenum and a 5" thick cast -in -place concrete slab -on -grade between the pool and the mechanical plenum. The floor is thickened at a trench drain. Per the original structural drawings, the floor was supposed to be sloped to the trench drains. Tile was placed on top of a layer of mortar over the floor slab. The thickness of the mortar is not known. This floor slope at the trench drain could have resulted in an uneven concrete surface, which also could have led to differing thicknesses of the mortar. • The tile has failed in many locations and is currently failing in many additional locations. In the past, when the tile was removed and replaced, the mortar was found to be deteriorated. The deteriorated mortar was removed. In addition, the concrete was also weak and easy to chip out. The weak concrete was removed with up to 4-5" of removal. The corroded rebar was not cleaned or removed. The concrete was patched with grout. Concrete specification 03300 includes a dry -shake hardener and a penetrating liquid floor sealer, but it does not specify where they were required to be installed. In the construction file, there were approved submittals for each of these products. But since the specifications didn't identify where these products must be used, it is possible that they were not used. These products are typically applied to the surface of floors after the concrete has been placed. Both of the products likely could have decreased the permeability of the concrete. Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Structural PND Engineers, Inc. Page 1 3-2 Community Pool Survey Update Page 40 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. KODIAK POOL STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT Paint specification 09900 includes a requirement that all concrete inside the building be painted with "bio vee seal" epoxy paint. It is not clear if this was installed. • There is considerable corrosion staining around the trench drain. It appears water is seeping through the joint between the trench drain and the slab. This is likely causing corrosion in the slab rebar. In the construction photos, the vertical support bars for the trench drain appear to extend to near the surface of the slab. Some of the staining could also be at these supports or these supports could be a conduit for water migration into the slab resulting in corrosion of the rebar. • In the mechanical plenum, there are numerous cracks in the elevated slab. At these cracks, there is efflorescence especially at the bottom of the trench drain. These are likely shrinkage cracks that occurred during construction. Pool tank floor The pool tank floor consists of a 5" thick cast -in -place concrete slab -on -grade. Tile is set on top of the floor slab. It is assumed that a layer of mortar was used between the concrete and the tile. Per comments on the rebar shop drawings, the mortar was supposed to be 1%" thick. Composite floor deck at ground floor (east of Grid 6): Composite floor deck consists of a 4" concrete topping over a 1%" deep x 20 GA composite floor deck (5%" total thickness). Per the approved submittals the deck is Type B-36 manufactured by Verco. The maximum span of the floor deck is 6'-6". The allowable superimposed load for this deck with a 6'-6" span is 375 psf. The concrete topping has radiant heat tubing in it. • There are numerous areas where the metal deck is corroded. This deck corrosion is likely due to exposure to pool saltwater. There are two general areas that the deck corrosion is occurring: o At a floor construction joint along Gridline 6. In addition, the deck corrosion appears to align with openings in the wall on the ground floor. This is at the two hallways, the door into the lifeguard room, and the door into the pool storage room. It is likely that water is dripping off people or equipment as they walk or are carried over the joint. This water seeps through the construction joint and into the composite deck. o At several floor drains. It appears that water is seeping through the joint around the drains and into the composite deck. This has also resulted in the drains lifting vertically, which in turn has resulted in water pooling around the drains. This likely has resulted in more water seeping through the joint. The deck corrosion varies in depth and extent. The deck corrosion at the floor drain in the northwest corner of women's locker room has resulted in an entire low flute compromised. At other locations, the deck corrosion is not as structurally concerning due to the excess capacity of the floor. Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Structural PND Engineers, Inc. Page 1 3-3 Community Pool Survey Update Page 41 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. KODIAK POOL STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT • The floor in the pool storage room does not have a file finish. The composite deck concrete topping has considerable damage to its surface. This damage appears to be due to pool saltwater exposure. This may be a result of wet equipment being stored in the room. Slab -on -grade in basement: • There were numerous cracks in the slab -on -grade. Some of the cracks are fairly wide. Most of the cracks have been filled with grout. In a few locations the crack filler has failed or is failing. It appears that these are shrinkage cracks that occurred during construction and were filled by the general contractor prior to the building being occupied. These types of cracks typically occur when the mix has too much water, is not properly cured, or when the control joints are not installed early enough. The owner should verify that they did not fill these cracks recently and that new cracks have not been forming or existing cracks widening. If any of these have occurred, it could indicate settlement and a structural engineer shall investigate the issue further. • The slab -on -grade in the back of the pool equipment room has considerable damage to the surface of the concrete. The tank anchorage brackets are also corroded. This damage appears to be due to pool saltwater exposure. Mezzanine in storage room in basement: Mezzanine is constructed of field welded Unistrut columns and beams. • Mezzanine is of questionable construction and may not have been designed by a structural engineer. • Mezzanine does not have guardrails around perimeter. Mechanical Plenum Access: • Access to plenum is provided by moveable stairs. The wheels do not lock resulting in an unsecured stair that is a safety hazard. Roof: Roof consists of open web steel joists and a 3%" deep x 18 GA dovetail acoustical metal roof deck. Per the approved submittals, the deck is ER3.5-18 manufactured by Epic. The structural steel specification 05120 required that the steel in the natatorium be coated with a high-performance zinc primer. The roof deck specification 05310 required that the deck in the natatorium have a G90 coating followed by two coats of rust inhibitive primer. The paint specification 09900 also includes a high-performance zinc rich top coat • There was considerable corrosion at each roof joist to column connection. It appears that a shim plate (likely uncoated) was installed between the column cap plate and the bottom of the joist seat. It also appears that the connection was field welded, which may have damaged the primer ­4 nnint in tho mron Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Structural PND Engineers, Inc. Page 1 3-4 Community Pool Survey Update Page 42 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. KODIAK POOL STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT • There was some minor corrosion of the steel in other areas. One area included between joist chord angles, where it does not look like paint and primer could be installed due to inadequate access. Another area was at the corners of the joist chord angles. These sharp corners are a common location for paint to fail. • Maintenance staff noted a couple small leaks in the roof near Gridlines A.5 and 2.5. From below, it looked like there was only minor staining of the paint and likely minimal damage to the roof decking. This should be monitored by owner and if it continues, the leak should be investigated further. Exterior Entry Canopy: The canopy is framed with hot dip galvanized structural steel beams and columns. The steel framing is exposed to weather. • Steel hot dip galvanizing coating is in good condition. There were a few spots where there is minor corrosion, which is likely due to damage to the galvanizing during construction. At the southeast corner of the building, it appears that the galvanizing may be wearing due to exposure to wind driven rain. Deck at Southwest corner of building: It appears that the original wood framed deck shown in the original structural drawings has been replaced with a hot dip galvanized steel framed deck with grating. • The deck appears to be in good condition except some of the connection plates. These connection plates do not appear to be galvanized and are corroding. Perimeter foundation wall: The perimeter foundation wall is an 8" thick cast -in -place concrete wall. • There was minor cracking in the perimeter foundation walls, but these cracks appear to be shrinkage cracks. There were no obvious signs of overstressing or settlement. Stairs at southeast corner of building: The stairs are hot dip galvanized steel framed with grating treads. • There is some minor corrosion of the steel. This appears to be mainly at field welds at guardrail post bases and where non galvanized bolts and washers were used. Retaining wall at east side of parking lot: The retaining wall is a 10" thick cast -in -place concrete wall. Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Structural PND Engineers, Inc. Page 1 3-5 Community Pool Survey Update Page 43 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. KODIAK POOL STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT • There was minor cracking in the retaining wall, but these cracks appear to be shrinkage cracks. At some of the cracks, there was some efflorescence. There were no obvious signs of overstressing or settlement. 4. RECOMMENDATIONS Immediate action: 1) Thoroughly wash down pool deck with freshwater to ensure pool saltwater is not allowed to seep into the tile grout joints. This should include at the construction joint along Gridline 6 at the hallways and doorways. Owner shall develop a program to ensure this happens at the pool deck and pool storage room at least every night. The slab in the rear of the pool equipment room in the basement shall be washed down with freshwater weekly. 2) Install a fixed ladder at the mechanical plenum access hatch in the basement storage room. 3) Have a structural engineer to evaluate the mezzanine in the basement storage room and verify if it can support a storage live load or post the capacity that it can support. 4) Add guardrails around mezzanine in basement storage room. Ongoing action: 1) When pool deck tile repairs are made, remove and replace all deteriorated mortar and concrete. Remove or clean all corroded rebar and tie wire. Seal all cracks in the concrete floor deck. Consult with a structural engineer during repairs to ensure repairs are complete and done properly. Short term action (within next two years): 1) At large corrosion stain in pool wall, remove tile and mortar. Have a structural engineer review and assess the concrete in the area. Any loose concrete shall be chipped out. All corroded rebar, steel plates, and tie wire shall be either cleaned or removed. 2) Seal concrete in pool gutters. 3) Replace 5 drains that have failed and are allowing water into the composite deck. Install joint sealant around remaining drains. All work will need to be coordinated with the in -floor radiant heat tubing. 4) Install joint sealant at construction joint along Grid 6. 5) Reinforce composite metal floor deck with angles under the women's locker room. 6) Install joint sealant on each side of the trench drain. 7) Paint all column to joist connections in the natatorium. 8) Seal cracks in surge tank walls. Cracks shall be sealed on the inside face of walls. 9) Coat exterior deck framing connections that are uncoated with zinc rich cold galvanizing paint. Long-term action: Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Structural PND Engineers, Inc. Page 1 3-6 Community Pool Survey Update Page 44 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. Am KODIAK POOL I STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT 1) Have a structural engineer inspect the structure within five years or after any major damage is noted in any structural elements or if corrosion staining in the pool walls increases significantly. 2) Inspect paint on roof steel in five years. It is anticipated that the steel will need to be repainted soon after this planned inspection. Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Structural PND Engineers, Inc. Page 1 3-7 Community Pool Survey Update Page 45 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. KODIAK POOL STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT Appendix A. Photos Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Structural Page 1 3-8 PND Engineers, Inc. Page 46 of 149 Community Pool Survey Update AGENDA ITEM #2.a. KODIAK POOL STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT Photo 1 - Corrosion staining in pool wall 14 t- tizl `'ram i-.}•r;-v' Ll v� ',I �• r���r- i i xFlw - �r s Photo 2 - Corrosion staining in pool wall Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Structural PND Engineers, Inc. Page 1 3-9 Community Pool Survey Update Page 47 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. Photo 3 - Corrosion staining in pool wall 'r -M � � q �r Photo 4 - Corrosion staining in pool wall Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Structural PND Engineers, Inc. KODIAK POOL STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT Page 13-10 Community Pool Survey Update Page 48 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT Photo 5 - Corrosion staining in pool wall (previous patch of tile in off-white) r- Photo 6 - Corrosion staining in pool wall Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Structural PND Engineers, Inc. Page 1 3-11 Community Pool Survey Update Page 49 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. Photo 7 - Corrosion staining in pool wall stair r is •' 4 . #� � i •.,r c.as � ?�+4 Photo 8 - Plates embedded in basement wall Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Structural PND Engineers, Inc. KODIAK POOL STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT Page 13-12 Community Pool Survey Update Page 50 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. Photo 10 - Corrosion staining in pool gutter Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Structural PND Engineers, Inc. KODIAK POOL STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT Page 13-13 Community Pool Survey Update Page 51 of 149 L � �`.i _,� � _ r`. > {' _ �I �� �A�� h. ��a� '�. AGENDA ITEM #2.a. KODIAK POOL STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT Photo 13 - Corrosion staining in pool deck near trench drain (possibly near trench drain support bar) Photo 14 - Efflorescence in cracks at underside of pool deck near trench drain Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Structural PND Engineers, Inc. Page 1 3-15 Community Pool Survey Update Page 53 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. KODIAK POOL STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT Photo 15 - Efflorescence in cracks at underside of pool deck near trench drain Photo 16 - Efflorescence in cracks at underside of pool deck near trench drain Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Structural PND Engineers, Inc. Page 13-16 Community Pool Survey Update Page 54 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. KODIAK POOL STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT Photo 17 - Efflorescence in cracks at underside of pool deck near trench drain Photo 18 - Efflorescence and corrosion staining in cracks at underside of pool deck near trench drain Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Structural PND Engineers, Inc. Page 13-17 Community Pool Survey Update Page 55 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. Photo 19 - Corrosion at bottom of composite floor deck near drain Photo 20 - Corrosion at bottom of composite floor deck near drain Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Structural PND Engineers, Inc. KODIAK POOL STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT Page 13-18 Community Pool Survey Update Page 56 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. KODIAK POOL STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT Photo 21 - Corrosion at bottom of composite floor deck near drain Photo 22 - Corrosion at bottom of composite floor deck near construction joint Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Structural PND Engineers, Inc. Page 1 3-19 Community Pool Survey Update Page 57 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. Photo 23 - Damage to top of composite slab in Pool Storage Room I Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Structural PND Engineers, Inc. KODIAK POOL STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT Page 13-20 Community Pool Survey Update Page 58 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. A -h Photo 25 - Cracks in basement slab -on -grade Photo 26 -Cracks in basement slab -on -grade (crack filler missing) Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Structural PND Engineers, Inc. KODIAK POOL STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT Page 1 3-21 Page 59 of 149 Community Pool Survey Update AGENDA ITEM #2.a. KODIAK POOL STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT Photo 27 Damage to top of basement slab -on -grade in Pool Equipment Room i r• 4 Photo 28 Damage to top of basement slab -on -grade and tank connections to slab in Pool Equipment Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Structural Page 1 3-22 PND Engineers, Inc. Page 60 of 149 Community Pool Survey Update AGENDA ITEM #2.a. KODIAK POOL STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT .r- Photo 29 - Corrosion at roof joist to column connection lift Photo 30 - Failing pint and corrosion between roof joist top chords Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Structural Page 1 3-23 PND Engineers, Inc. Page 61 of 149 Community Pool Survey Update AGENDA ITEM #2.a. h -- . .pry "��'� �l ? •. Photo 31 - Corrosion of entry canopy beam Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Structural PND Engineers, Inc. KODIAK POOL STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT Page 13-24 Community Pool Survey Update Page 62 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. Photo 33 - Cracking in perimeter foundation wall Photo 34 - Corrosion exterior stair guardrail Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Structural PND Engineers, Inc. KODIAK POOL STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT Page 13-25 Community Pool Survey Update Page 63 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. Photo 35 - Corrosion exterior stair connection Photo 36 - Efflorescence at cracking in retaining Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Structural PND Engineers, Inc. KODIAK POOL STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT Page 13-26 Community Pool Survey Update Page 64 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. 4. Architectural Assessment Introduction The architectural condition survey took place on May 19 & 20, 2025. The survey was conducted to assess the condition of the existing architectural components with respect to physical condition. Inspection of the existing components included a visual inspection, interviews with facilities and maintenance personnel, review of prior inspection/condition reports, and a review of historical facility record drawings. Concealed elements of construction were not inspected. Observations / Recommendations Site Structures General Description: The facility has a steel grating deck to the west and a concrete retaining wall and exterior steel stairs leading to a lower parking area to the east. General Condition: Good. Some surface rust is on the steel structural members and there is spalling/rust at the top stair railing connection to the concrete walk. • Recommendation Al: Repair Exterior Steel o Deficiency: Rust on exterior steel, damaged connection of railing to concrete. o Remedy: Strip rust to bare steel, treat with cold galvanizing or paint. Repair concrete connection. o Priority: Medium Al: Rust on Exterior Steel Al: Damaged Concrete at Handrail Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Architectural Page 14-1 Jensen Yorba Wall, Inc. October 2025 Page 65 of 149 Community Pool Survey Update AGENDA ITEM #2.a. Site Hardscape General Description: The facility has a paved parking lot to the south at the upper floor and along the east at the lower floor. There is a large concrete walkway at the main entrance to the upper floor with benches and sculptures. General Condition: Good. No issues with storm drainage were identified by the facilities & maintenance staff. Ciro ►Itilitioc General Condition: No issues with utility systems were identified by the facilities & maintenance staff. Upper Parking Lot to South Fvtorinr Wnllc Lower Parking Lot to East General Description: Exterior walls of the building have concealed -faster metal panel siding over framing or concrete. General Condition: Good (walls) / Poor (flashings). Surface algae growth on some of the wall metal panels, particularly on the north side. Some light surface damage to the panels around the service doors on the lower levels. Rust on galvanized flashings around mechanical louvers and at base of metal wall panels, particularly on the east elevation. • Recommendation A2: Schedule Exterior Wash -Downs o Deficiency: Other metal panel buildings in town show deterioration due to salt in the air. o Remedy: Schedule annual fresh -water wash -down of building exterior. Clean off algae. Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Architectural Page 14-2 Jensen Yorba Wall, Inc. October 2025 Page 66 of 149 Community Pool Survey Update AGENDA ITEM #2.a. o Priority: Medium • Recommendation A3: Repair Exterior Galv. Steel Flashings o Deficiency: Rust on exterior steel flashings o Remedy: Strip rust to bare steel, treat with cold galvanizing or paint. o Priority: Medium A2: Algae Growth on Metal Wall Panels A3: Rust on Exterior Steel Flashing Exterior Glazing General Description: Aluminum storefront -type windows. Window trim and flashings match metal wall panels or are galvanized steel where the windows extend down to grade. General Condition: Good (windows) / Poor (sill flashings). Windows and frames are high -quality and in good condition. The galv. flashings at the base of some windows has significant rust. • Recommendation A4: Repair Exterior Galv. Steel Flashings o Deficiency: Rust on exterior steel flashing o Remedy: Strip rust to bare steel, treat with cold galvanizing or paint. o Priority: Medium Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Architectural Jensen Yorba Wall, Inc. Page 14-3 October 2025 Community Pool Survey Update Page 67 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. - -J r. � 4r F_ A4: Rust on Window Sill Flashing A4: Rust on Window Sill Flashing Exterior Doors General Description: Exterior doors are FRP- covered, glazed doors in aluminum frames with continuous hinges. The main entrance doors have panic -bar exit device hardware and other doors have mortise locksets. General Condition: Good (doors) / Poor (main exit hardware). Doors and frames are high -quality and in good condition. The door hardware at the main entrances is failing and is very difficult to operate / unlatch. • Recommendation AS: Repair / Replace Entrance Door Hardware o Deficiency: Panic bars do not fully disengage locking bolts at door frames. o Remedy: Repair or replace hardware as required for fully -functioning exiting. o Priority: High Roofing General Description: PVC membrane on low -slope roofs. General Condition: Fair. The majority of the roof membrane, flashings and accessories appear to be in good condition and about halfway through the expected lifespan. However, there are several locations of black patches on the white membrane roof, indicating that there have been some past leaks. The Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Architectural Page 14-4 Jensen Yorba Wall, Inc. October 2025 Page 68 of 149 Community Pool Survey Update AGENDA ITEM #2.a. type of material used in the patches is unknown. There also appear to be some failing seams in the membrane. • Recommendation A6: Research Roof Warranty, Develop Repair Protocol o Deficiency: Patches appear to not match roof membrane. o Remedy: Research roof warranty and system. Engage original roof manufacturer if warranty is still in effect, or develop repair protocols recommended for membrane if warranty is expired. Repair failed seams. o Priority: Medium < ' o r. t � A6: Black Patches on Roof Membrane Interior Floors and Finishes A6: Failed Seam in Roof Membrane General Description: Interior floors of the upper level are constructed of cast -in -place concrete slabs west of Grid 6 and composite concrete slabs over metal decking east of Grid 6. The majority of the interior finishes on the upper floor are the with the carpet tile in the entry Lobby and Admin areas. General Condition: Poor. Water is penetrating through the tile, causing damage to the concrete below. The tiles have also come unbonded from the structure below throughout the Natatorium and in some locations have actually come loose in patches. See Pool and Structural sections for additional information. Discussion: Research indicates several possible reasons for the water infiltration / the adhesion failure, some of which may be happening simultaneously: 1. Lack of waterproof membrane in tile assembly. From information in the original design drawings and specifications as well as the construction submittals, the assembly at the tile floors/pool walls appears to be: 1) structural concrete, 2) thick Setting Bed Mortar ("Laticrete 226" with "Laticrete 3701" admixture), 3) Tile Bond Coat ("Mapei Grani/Rapid", perhaps also Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Architectural Jensen Yorba Wall, Inc. Page 14-5 October 2025 Page 69 of 149 Community Pool Survey Update AGENDA ITEM #2.a. with some areas of "Mapei Kerabond/Keralastic" additive), 4) Tile with 5) Tile Grout ("Mapei Ultra/Color"). Although the Tile Bond Coat should offer some protection from water infiltration, current best practices would be to have a dedicated cementitious waterproofing membrane (such as "Laticrete Hydro Ban") applied between the Setting Bed Mortar and the Tile Bond Coat. 2. Different manufacturers used in tile assembly. It is not clear why both Laticrete and Mapei products were used in the floor assembly. It may be that products from the two companies are not working together optimally. 3. Lack of control/expansion Joints in tile assembly. Current best practices call for sealant -filled flexible control/expansion joints at approximately 8'-10' on center in tile floor surfaces and wherever a change in plane occurs, such as at the wall/floor joint of the pool tank. There are very few control joints observable in the Natatorium, so perhaps the floor assembly cannot accommodate any movement and is causing the tiles to come loose from the substrate. 4. Gutter waterproofing. The gutter drain around the perimeter of the pool tank has an applied waterproofing with a joint to the tile assembly at the tops of the gutter. The original Epoxy Coat waterproofing failed and was replaced a few years ago. Current best practice details would have the tile assembly with a waterproof membrane wrap continuously from the adjacent walls/floors into the gutter to both avoid joints and an exposed waterproof membrane. 5. Caustic chemicals/salt on the tile assembly. As noted in the Mechanical section of the report, the waste piping from the drains in the Natatorium are failing prematurely. This indicates that higher -than -expected levels of chemicals or salt have been present in the pool area. Possible causes may include: concentrated chemicals used to clean the floors, a lack of regular fresh water washdowns of the floors, and/or an improper chemical balance in the pool tank itself. These chemicals or salt may be interacting with the tile and mortars. 6. Failure of the floor drains. In several locations adjacent to the Natatorium the tile around the individual floor drains is rising significantly, lifting the drain grates about the surrounding floor surface by up to %". It is not clear what is causing this uplift, but it might be caused by corrosion in the drain body or expansion of some sort of material used in the original construction, such as a Bentonite waterstop. Because of the uplift and resulting cracks in the tile mortar, water is not flowing into the drains, but down into the tile assembly. • Recommendation A7: Replace Tile Assembly, Develop Maintenance & Cleaning Protocol o Deficiency: Tile assembly is failing causing additional issues. o Remedy: Replace tile assembly with design informed by current best practices. Repair/replace structural and mechanical items as described in those sections of the report. Develop a maintenance & cleaning protocol for the new finishes. o Priority: High Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Architectural Jensen Yorba Wall, Inc. Page 14-6 October 2025 Community Pool Survey Update Page 70 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. >.�$ v y A7: Raised Floor Drain at Lifeguard Room A7: Tile Adhesion Failure in Natatorium r• u' 1 ����/1����iiiii�ill/pp1 fin■■ ������iii��� ill�Bwon�■1��■■�iiiiii��//ilf��� oans��w.. 3 on _iii■■■■® ■en■■nal esei•.••.��i��.�� MEMO Boom lam:%�tr i++♦♦++♦♦+�♦♦+��•+ M � v e� ee e+ ee ee e♦ `iv vv®ie��ie�i�•ii•�s�e�i�e�ii vovvvv��••••���♦♦ • A7: Tile Adhesion Failure in Natatorium'•. • Lack of Control/Expansion Joint in Pool Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Architectural Jensen Yorba Wall, Inc. Page 14-7 October 2025 Community Pool Survey Update Page 71 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. Interior Partitions and Wall Finishes General Description and Condition: Interior partitions throughout the facility are covered in a variety of materials, including tile, phenolic paneling, or painted GWB. General Condition: Good. Interior Doors and Frames General Description: Interior doors are solid -core covered in FRP with aluminum frames. Door hardware is good quality locksets. General Condition: Good (doors & hardware) / Fair (frames). The bases of some of the door frames have applied repair patch material indicating some deterioration, particularly near the pool. Recommendation A8: Repair / Replace Door Frames o Deficiency: Door frames around the pool are deteriorating o Remedy: Repair/replace the door frames as part of the tile floor assembly replacement. o Priority: Medium i � t 1i• i Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Architectural Jensen Yorba Wall, Inc. Page 14-8 October 2025 Community Pool Survey Update Page 72 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. Interior Specialties General Description: Casework is plastic laminate with solid -surface countertops. Bathroom partitions are solid phenolic panels. Bathroom accessories are stainless steel. General Condition: Good to Fair. • Recommendation A9: Repair / Replace Interior Specialties o Deficiency: Some casework and countertops are broken. Some toilet accessories are failing. o Remedy: Repair/replace items as needed o Priority: Low A9: Missing Cabinet Door I A9: Cracked Countertop Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Architectural Jensen Yorba Wall, Inc. Page 14-9 October 2025 Community Pool Survey Update Page 73 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. 5. Mechanical Assessment Introduction The Kodiak Pool mechanical and plumbing systems are mostly original to the facility construction in 2008. As such, they are all approaching the expected life of these systems should be scheduled for replacement in the next 5 to 10 years. We investigated the facility for conformance to the following codes: Uniform Plumbing Code (UPC) - 2018 International Mechanical Code (IMC) - 2021 International Fire Code (IFC) - 2021 NFPA Standard 13 -2019 Observations Fire Protection The fire sprinkler water entrance is in the pool facility mechanical room. The fire water service is combined with the domestic water service through an 8" ductile iron pipe. The sprinkler system is served by a single wet riser in the mechanical room. This riser has the requisite backflow preventer, flow switch, isolation valves, main drain, and test port. The piping is standard black steel pipe with grooved fittings. The system is generally serviceable and in good condition. The fire sprinkler heads in the natatorium and locker room areas have excessive amounts of corrosion and should be replaced with new heads. We would recommend that corrosion resistant heads be used, such as ones with an electroless nickel (ENT), a PTFE, or an electroless nickel-PTFE coating. Plumbing The plumbing piping and fixtures all appear to be original to the facility. The water service entrance is in the mechanical room of the facility and is cojoined with the fire sprinkler system. There is a water meter on the domestic service, and there is a separate water meter in line for measuring just the pool fill, ostensibly for deductive metering purposes. Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Mechanical RSA Engineering, Inc. Page 15-1 October 2025 Community Pool Survey Update Page 74 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. 1 a �I Water Service Entrance The domestic water piping, where visible, is copper pipe. As this pipe is only 17 years old, it should have some life left in it. The piping is insulated with fiberglass insulation with a vapor barrier. The pipe and insulation appeared to be in good condition from external investigation. The waste piping appears to all be no -hub cast iron. The waste piping serving the domestic plumbing fixtures appears to be in good condition. The waste piping serving the pool deck drains and any drains close to the pool is severely corroded from the salt water and has suffered multiple failures. The waste pipe serving the deck drains should all be replaced in the immediate future. The piping through the concrete pool structure walls that is inaccessible below grade should be sandblasted clean and lined with an epoxy liner. As all the domestic waste piping is downstream of the deck drains, it gets flushed with non -salt water on a regular basis and is assumed to be in good condition. Select runs of waste piping, especially the building drain main line should be scoped with a camera to be sure the pipe actually is in good condition. The roof drain piping is no -hub cast iron and insulated with fiberglass. The rain leaders exit underground to the storm main on the east side. The overflow rain leaders exit to daylight on the east side of the mechanical room. Domestic hot water is produced in the mechanical room using a single -wall plate and frame heat exchanger and a 200-gallon insulated storage tank. This equipment recently replaced the three originally installed indirect water heaters. As the heating medium for the heat exchanger is glycol from the boiler loop, use of a single -wall heat exchanger is in violation of UPC 505.4.1 and the heat exchanger should be replaced with a double -wall model. Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Mechanical Page 15-2 RSA Engineering, Inc. October 2025 Page 75 of 149 Community Pool Survey Update AGENDA ITEM #2.a. a Water Heater The hot water from the storage tank is routed through a mixing valve to provide tempered water to the showers and restrooms. The mixing valve is labeled as non -operational and the water temperature is controlled by the water heater. This mixing valve should be replaced with a new unit so the temperature of the tank can be elevated for additional capacity and bacteria control. The hot water line from the tank also serves the hose bibs on the pool deck, but this line does not route through the tempering valve, so care should be taken when using these hose bibs to prevent scalding of the users. The plumbing fixtures are primarily vitreous china. The water closets are all wall -hung units with flush - mounted flush valves. The lavatories are counter -mounted and have infrared operation with temperature control on the faucet. The water closets, urinals, and lavatories appear to be in good condition and functional. The lavatories in the locker rooms do not have the requisite ASSE 1070 mixing valves installed to limit the water temperature. These were not required at the time of construction of this facility, but the mixing valves are required by current plumbing code. Heating The heating piping and equipment all appear to be original to the facility, which makes it all 17 years old and midway through the expected life of the piping and equipment. A number of older leaks in the heating system were observed at piping joints, but these had been repaired. The heating piping is copper up to three-inch and is assumed to be welded black steel for the four -inch and six-inch sizes. The heating piping is insulated with fiberglass. Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Mechanical RSA Engineering, Inc. Page 15-3 October 2025 Community Pool Survey Update Page 76 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. The heating boilers are located in the high school and provide heating water for the entire school and pool facilities. There is a set of heat exchangers in the high school boiler room that provide the heating glycol to the pool. The pumps for the pool heating areGrundfos Type LPS Model C91 pumps sized for 245 GPM and are located in the pool mechanical room. These appear to be in good condition. High School heat exchangers for Pool Building Pool Building heating pumps The heat exchangers in the high school have a leak in the isolation valve on the boiler side when the boilers are off and the system cools down. The pumps on the boiler side of the heat exchangers are operated through variable frequency drives and one of the drives is not operational and needs to be replaced. The heating fluid for the system is a glycol mix. The glycol had lost its antifreeze properties and was very dirty, so during the inspection the system was drained in preparation for flushing and filling with new glycol and no heating equipment was operational. There is a vortex shedding flow meter with temperature monitoring installed near the pumps that can be used to determine how much boiler energy is being used by the pool. This meter is immediately adjacent to a pipe elbow, so its readings are suspect since the meter installation instructions require 10 pipe diameters of straight upstream pipe and 5 pipe diameters of straight downstream pipe to achieve the stated accuracy. The terminal heat for the pool is from three systems. The natatorium is served with forced air by an air handler with a heating coil in it. The locker rooms and lobby areas are served by a separate air handler that has reheat coils in the ductwork. Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Mechanical RSA Engineering, Inc. Page 15-4 October 2025 Community Pool Survey Update Page 77 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. The locker rooms and lobby are also served by a radiant floor heating system. There is no tempering control on the glycol going into the floor slab, so the slab is receiving the full temperature glycol of over 160°F. Concrete standards state the glycol temperature going into a slab should not exceed 140°F. The system does have slab sensors in it that limit the slab temperature to 80 degrees while heating to meet room temperature, so the floors do not appear to overheat. The pool is heated from the boiler loop heating glycol using dual shell and tube heat exchangers. T Pool water heat exchangers Ventilation The pool building is ventilated by two main air handlers and three exhaust fans located in the pool facility mechanical room that all were installed in 2008. All this equipment appears to be in good condition and will remain serviceable for many more years with proper care. Air handler AHU-1 serves the natatorium. This is a Haakon unit sized for 26,000 CFM. It has a mixed air section, a hydronic heating coil, a supply fan, and three separate reheat coils in the supply ducts going to the natatorium. The supply air feeds into the bases of the exterior walls and diffuses through the pool wall system, mostly at pool deck level. The air returns through the low ceiling just outside the office area end of the pool. The unit appears to be properly sized for air turnover and adequately sized for humidity and temperature control. At the time of the site investigation the pool was drained and the heating system glycol was drained, so we could not evaluate how well the unit was maintaining temperature and humidity in the natatorium space. Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Mechanical Page 15-5 RSA Engineering, Inc. October 2025 Page 78 of 149 Community Pool Survey Update AGENDA ITEM #2.a. AHU-1 Exhaust fan EF-1 exhausts a minimum of 3,600 CFM from the natatorium for ventilation air and humidity maintenance. It can also exhaust up to 12,000 CFM from the natatorium for economizer cooling of the space. EF-1 is a Haakon unit with a glycol runaround heat recovery coil between its exhaust air and the incoming outside air in AHU-2. _ k3 l 1 EF-1 Air handler AHU-2 is a Haakon makeup air unit that supplies 6,300 CFM to the lobby, office, and locker room areas. This unit supplies 100% outside air continuously and had no return duct connection. It has the glycol runaround heat recovery coil as its first heating coil, and then two heating prior to the supply fan to be able to provide warm supply air. Given the poor condition of the heating system glycol, the glycol in the heat recovery runaround loop should be checked for proper freeze protection, pH, and cleanliness. The supply air from AHU-2 has a number of hydronic reheat coils in the ductwork for zone control of the heating of the various spaces it serves. FP— q� A' AHU-2 Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Mechanical Page 15-6 RSA Engineering, Inc. October 2025 Page 79 of 149 Community Pool Survey Update AGENDA ITEM #2.a. Exhaust fan EF-2 is an in -line plenum fan and provides 3,000 CFM of exhaust from the restrooms, locker rooms, and shower rooms. This unit is located in the mechanical room and appears to be in good condition. EF-2 Exhaust fan EF-3 is an inline forward curved fan and provides 250 CFM of exhaust from the pool process equipment room and the adjacent crawlspace. Controls The facility has a Siebe Network 8000 direct digital control (DDC) system. This system controls the air handlers and heating systems. It appears to be operational, but it is obsolete, and parts and service are no longer available for it. It should be considered for replacement in the near future. There are three temperature and humidity sensors in the natatorium space, but at least one of these is no longer functional. One of the sensors is mounted on the perforated wall providing the suppy air to the space, so it likely is getting a lower humidity reading than the space actually has. The sensor on the lobby wall under the return grilles would give the best indication of natatorium conditions, but this is the sensor that has failed. The controls are averaging the two space humidity sensors to determine how much outside air is required to dehumidify the natatorium. One of the sensors is reading a bit low since it is mounted in the supply air stream, and the other is failed and reading nothing. As a result, the space is likely underventilated due to the erroneously low readings of the space humidity sensors. Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Mechanical Page 15-7 RSA Engineering, Inc. October 2025 Page 80 of 149 Community Pool Survey Update AGENDA ITEM #2.a. Deficiencies M1 Natatorium, Shower and Locker Rooms Priority: High Observation: Sprinkler heads are corroded and may not function properly. Recommendation: Replace sprinkler heads in these areas. W W W W 0 000 10*000004 0 o il; 111110. P*040 ®®4 0 Corroded Sprinkler Head, Locker Room Corroded Sprinkler Head, Natatorium M-2 Crawl Space Priority: High Observation: The waste piping serving the deck drains is corroding to the point of failure in a number of areas. Recommendation: Replace all deck drain piping and provide an epoxy liner on the portions that are inaccessible below ground. Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Mechanical Page 15-8 RSA Engineering, Inc. October 2025 Page 81 of 149 Community Pool Survey Update AGENDA ITEM #2.a. 9 Via- r s Internal Deck Drain Pipie Corrosion M-3 Pool Fan Room Priority: Low Observation: The locker room lavatories are missing the required mixing valves to limit hot water temperature Recommendation: Install ASSE 1070 mixing valves on the lavatories Missing tempering valves Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Mechanical Page 15-9 RSA Engineering, Inc. October 2025 Page 82 of 149 Community Pool Survey Update AGENDA ITEM #2.a. M-4 Mechanical Room Priority: Medium Observation: Domestic hot water Heat exchanger is single wall construction in violation of UPC 505.4.1 Recommendation: Replace heat exchanger. i NOTE SIN GLF';4LL HEAT F �H"GIN ROVy�N, R Lyf MOW Domestic water heat exchanger M-5 Mechanical Room Priority: Medium Observation: The domestic hot water tempering valve has failed and no longer controls the hot water temperature to the plumbing fixtures. Recommendation: Replace tempering valve. ;.0 t'� r Failed tempering valve Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Mechanical Page 15-10 RSA Engineering, Inc. October 2025 Page 83 of 149 Community Pool Survey Update AGENDA ITEM #2.a. M-6 Mechanical Room Priority: Low Observation: The BTU meter at the pool is poorly located to provide an accurate reading. Recommendation: Relocate meter 40 inches from upstream elbow. s ;2 as BTU meter M-7 Mechanical Room Priority: Medium Observation: The building controls are obsolete and unsupported. Recommendation: Replace the building digital control system. Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Mechanical Page 1 5-11 RSA Engineering, Inc. October 2025 -a i� 3 Building Mechanical Controls Building Mechanical Controls Page 84 of 149 Community Pool Survey Update AGENDA ITEM #2.a. M-8 Natatorium Priority: High Observation: The building controls are getting artificially low humidity readings in the natatorium due to a failed sensor. Recommendation: Replace the sensor za„w r.nw,..aaes�;keo w.eum Laawa•erL��� I H—diLS_C.ewl �jg \T d_4v_Law_l.vn:t 6V69.IBS +.a a•Le.wa..r Li;� Ma, .nw Lm,gvm s@ur![R,.n,tsv� �� �� .m ar ,aw nr�ea s�ie aim sa.a r��a a n umt aym S.,pw�A L,Mx�sv1 - � wM i.mc�a aam 3d,c Humiditv sensor readings Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Mechanical RSA Engineering, Inc. Page 15-12 October 2025 Community Pool Survey Update Page 85 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.a. 6. Electrical Assessment Introduction The Kodiak Pool electrical systems (power, lighting, special systems, fire alarm, etc) are mostly original to the facility construction in 2008. The distribution equipment still haves 10-20 additional years of useful life and as long as there are no failures can remain in place. The other systems are approaching their end of life and may need to either be replaced or component updates depending on the system. We investigated the facility for conformance to the following codes: National Electrical Code (NEC) - 2017 International Building Code (IBC) - 2018 International Fire Code (IFCO - 2018 NFPA 72, Standard for Installation of Fire Alarm Systems - 2019 Observations Power Distribution The power distribution system consists of a Main Distribution Panel in the basement level electrical room with sub -panel fed from this panel in different areas of the facility to serve local loads. The MDP has spare capacity and space to serve additional loads. However, the top three, single -pole spaces are located above 6'-7" above finished grade and no breaker may be installed in those locations as they would violate NEC 240.24(A). All equipment is manufacturered by Square D and is in excellent condition. Lighting Lighting is all fluorescent type except in the Natatorium which is using Metal -Halide lamps. Most of the public areas are using T5HO type fluorescent fixtures while back of house is using T8 type lamps. All controls are manual controls. Emergency lighting is provided via battery back up lighting units and exit signs are battery back up units with some photoluminescent self -lighted signs used in the back of house areas. Per conversation on -site the T5HO lamps have failed and in some cases the tombstones are also failing which are expensive to replace. The have replaced most of them but some are using LED replacement lamps. The Metal -Halide fixtures used in the Natatorium have had the lamps replaced with LED type lamps for the last 6-7 years. All these lamps failed last year and have since been replaced with new LED Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Electrical Page 16-1 RSA Engineering, Inc. October 2025 Page 86 of 149 Community Pool Survey Update AGENDA ITEM #2.a. lamps. During our walk through we tested the emergency lighting system which appears to be function except for at least one exit sign. We would recommend a complete lighting upgrade to use new LED type fixtures as well as evaluating areas which can use newer automatic controls. In some cases this could be one -for -one with similar types of fixtures but in others the technology could be used to provide more efficient lighting as well as reduce fixture counts. An example would be the natatorium. The latest LED technology can be use uplight and be aimed such that existing locations may be used but with fewer fixtures. Automatic controls may also help reduce energy use of the facility so that Hallways or storage areas would only be lit when in use. The move to LED technology would also reduce maintenance as no lamp replacement would be required. The exit sign will need to be replaced and we recommend a similar battery operated type. Special Systems The telecommunications appeared to be in good condition and we did not see any reason to upgrade or replaced based on the use of the building. The PA system for the pool was in good working order and still usable. Replacement would only be recommended or required to use better technology or to provide better usability. Fire Alarm is in good working order and does not need to be upgraded or replace until the system is no able to be maintained which would not be for another 10 years at least. There is a timing system that has failed which may be due to the in slab routing of telemetry wiring. This system will need to be replaced and we would recommend something either wireless or routed above grade. Kodiak Pool Condition Assessment - Electrical RSA Engineering, Inc. Page 16-2 October 2025 Community Pool Survey Update Page 87 of 149 n 0 3 3 T 0 o_ Q m v 00 co 0 I(ODIAK SCHOOL & COMMUNITY POOL CONDITION ASSESSMENT - SUMMARY & DECISION FRAMEWORK PREPARED FOR THE KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ASSEMBLY OCTOBER 2025 REPORT BASIS n 0 3 3 T 0 0 1< C Q v v 00 0 COMMUNITY IMPORTANCE • Critical year-round recreational hub • Supports KHS swimming, Kingfishers, Masters, Water Safety / Otter Babies • Inclusive & ADA-accessible Reference: Pool Assessment - Introduction, pp. 2-2 to 2-3 _ TO 111111 i _d 5 s 0 0 3 3 c 0 0 Cn CD CD 0 FACILITY QUICK FACTS Completed 2009 25-yard, 6-lane competition pool + shallow learn -to -swim + toddler pool National award -winning design (201 1) Reference: Pool Assessment - Introduction, p. 2-2 M v CD IR 0 HISTORICAL TIMELINE Year 2017 2023 May -Jun 2024 March 2025 May 2025 References: Exec Summary p. 1-2; Pool Assessment pp. 2-2 to 2-3 4 Milestone Construction completed Partial tile overhaul attempted (short-lived success) WTI Evaluation: corrosion + grout + deck issues Deck and filtration repairs; temporary closure New starting blocks; dive stand repainted Full M/E/S/A condition assessment conducted WHY WE'RE HERE Recurring & worsening failures in waterproofing + the/structural system Water infiltration is: • Loosening tile throughout wet areas • Corroding concrete and rebar • Damaging drains and composite floor deck Reference: Exec Summary pp. 1-2 to 1-3; Architectural Assessment pp. 4-5 to 4-6 0 0 3 3 c 0 0 Cn CD v W 0 MULTIDISCIPLINARY ASSESSMENT CONDUCTED Team: 000 Jensen Yo rba • Jensen Yorba Wall - Project lead / Architecture ENEWall • Water Technology Inc - Aquatics systems 0001 nc. • PND Engineers - Structural • RSA Engineering - Mechanical & Electrica RSA Reference: Executive Summary p. 1-3 Engineering �-1 0 9 win 0 0 3 3 c 0 0 Cn CD v 0 STRUCTURAL FINDINGS • Rebar corrosion in pool walls + gutters • Composite floor deck corrosion near drains • Column/joist connection corrosion • Foundation wall cracking + efflorescence Reference: Structural Assessment Observations pp. 3-2 to 3-7 & Appendix photos pp. 3-9 to 3-26 s i s" s 0 0 3 3 c 0 0 Cn CD v 0 0 ARCHITECTURAL FINDINGS • Tile debonding widespread in natatorium • Lack of waterproof membrane in original assembly • Door hardware failing at main entrance • Flashing and exterior steel corrosion beginning • Some roof seam failures & patching concerns Reference: Architectural Assessment pp. 4-4 to 4-6 MAI AVO n c� Z °n m N 0 0 3 0 0 1< Q v v 0 MECHANICAL FINDINGS • Domestic hot water heat exchanger violates code • Tempering valve failed • Building controls obsolete, humidity sensor broken • BTU meter improperly located Reference: Mechanical Observations/Recommendations pp. 5-10 to 5-12 A 0 0 3 3 c 0 0 Cn CD CD v ELECTRICAL FINDINGS • Lighting systems reaching end -of -life LED replacement recommended • Emergency exit sign failure observed • Timing system failed (likely wiring issue) Reference: Electrical Assessment pp. 6-1 to 6-2v 11 0 0 3 3 c 0 o_ Cn CD 0 RISKS & IMPACTS Category Structural Operations Safety Risk Deterioration accelerates --* expensive replacement later Growing closures for emergency fixes Deck heaving, sharp tile failures, humidity control problems Deferred failures cost multiples of proactive Financial investment Reference: Exec Summary pp. 1-2 to 1-3; Structural Actions pp. 3-7 12 0 0 3 3 c 0 0 Cn CD v 0 0 0 CURRENT ACCESSIBILITY & COMPLIANCE • ADA-access system improvements may be required with major renovation • VGBA drain compliance must be validated with repairs Reference: Pool Assessment Notes pp. 2-4 to 2-5 feedback 13 0 0 3 3 c 0 0 Cn CD v 0 0 OPTIONS UNDER CONSIDERATION Option What It Does Pros A - Targeted Test Repair Lifeguard Rm. demo & Validates cause before rebuild (-200 sf) major spend Cons Not a fix itself B - Full Wet -Area Repair Replace tile assembly + Major downtime & Program waterproofing + draiLong-term fix ns highest cost C — Patch -As -Fail Local tile repairs only Minimal near -term cost Not recommended — hides degradation Reference: Exec Summary— Next Steps pp. 1-3 14 THANKYOU Codi Allen Project Manager/Inspector Callen@kodiakak.us AGENDA ITEM #2.b. KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH STAFF REPORT DECEMBER 16, 2025 ASSEMBLY WORK SESSION SUBJECT: Assembly Review Of State And Federal CIP Lists ORIGINATOR: Aimee Williams, Borough Manager RECOMMENDATION: Review and discuss needed capital improvement projects within the Kodiak Island Borough. DISCUSSION: Each year, the Planning and Zoning Commission passes a resolution that recommends to the Assembly a list of Capital Improvement Projects within the borough. The Assembly reviews this resolution and then discusses which capital improvement projects should be submitted to state and federal government representatives for consideration of legislative grant and/or program funding. The selected projects are listed within a resolution for formal documentation. ALTERNATIVES: FISCAL IMPACT: OTHER INFORMATION: Copies of last year's State and Federal resolutions are attached for reference. Kodiak Island Borough Assembly Review Of State And Federal CIP Lists Page 103 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.b. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 Introduced by: Bronwyn Currie Requested by: P&Z Commission Drafted by: Bronwyn Currie Introduced on: 7/9/2025 Adopted on: 9/17/2025 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH RESOLUTION NO. FY2026-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS PRIORITY LIST FOR FY2026-02 WHEREAS, the Kodiak Island Borough represents approximately 12,570 residents of the Kodiak Island Archipelago living in six incorporated cities and one community governed by a tribal council government per the Alaska Department of Labor and Work Force Development; and WHEREAS, a Borough -wide capital improvement program is adopted annually by the Kodiak Island Borough Assembly with recommendations from the Planning & Zoning Commission. This list identifies the major needs of the island community for the next five years, and WHEREAS, THE Kodiak island Borough identifies priority projects to be submitted to the Alaska State legislative delegation and the Federal legislative delegation when applying for grants; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH THAT: Section 1: The Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission recommends the following capital improvement projects, in order of priority, for adoption into the Kodiak Island Borough FY 2025-2029 CIP list of Capital Projects: 1. Kodiak Wastewater Treatment Plant Facility Estimated Project Cost $1,900,000 Funding Acquired $100,000 Needed Funds $1,800,000 The City of Kodiak provides water and sewer services to Kodiak Island Borough residences and business that are located adjacent to City of Kodiak boundaries. The City of Kodiak Treatment Plant operates under an Alaskan Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC) APDES permits. The first phase of a larger project to upgrade the City of Kodiak Wastewater Treatment Plant was to evaluate the facility for immediate system's needs. The last major maintenance upgrades to the facility was in 1999. The condition and evaluation assessment included all major components within the plant interior and exterior, the outbuildings and three aeration basins; including all mechanical equipment needs. Alaska Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (APDES) permitting requirements were included during this assessment. Included in the facility rebuild assessment is the supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system to interface Kodiak Island Borough, Alaska Resolution No. FY2026-02 Page 1 of 7 Page 104 of 149 Assembly Review Of State And Federal CIP Lists AGENDA ITEM #2.b. 50 with the 34 sewer lift station pumps and waste treatment at the facility. This facility with its 51 labyrinth of connecting sewer lines, directly serves 2667 City of Kodiak and Kodiak 52 Borough households including commercial businesses. The Treatment Plant also serves 53 the U.S. Kodiak Coast Guard Base and the Pacific Spaceport Complex indirectly with our 54 certified laboratory testing and waste disposal; not to mention NOAA vessels, the Alaska 55 Marine Highway vessels and the expanding cruise ship industry stopovers in our Kodiak 56 Harbors. 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 The Kodiak Island Borough supports the City of Kodiak request for Federal funding in the amount of $1.9M to begin design efforts leading to the construction of this critical infrastructure Wastewater Treatment Plant project that will support the wastewater needs of the Community for the next twenty years. 2. City of Larsen Bay Reservoir Spill Way Estimated Project Cost $1,200,000 Funding Acquired $0.00 Needed Funds $1,200,000 The water reservoir spill way in the community of Larsen Bay is eroding and is nearing failure. This reservoir provides drinking water and hydroelectric power to the residents in the second-class city on Kodiak Island's west side. The Kodiak Island Borough supports the second-class City of Larsen Bay's request for funding assistance. 3. City of Port Lions Water Distribution System Replacement Estimated Project Cost $8,000,000 Funding Acquired $0.00 Needed Funds $8,000,000 The original water and sewer distribution system for our community was built after the 1964 Good Friday earthquake and tsunami forced the displaced residents of Afognak to relocate in what is now known as Port Lions. In 1964 a new system was installed. However, the contractor did not complete the job correctly. Many homes were not connected to the new system and many homes were connected incorrectly. The now connected system is considered aged out because it is over twenty-five (25) years old. The City of Port Lions Public Works crew constantly has a list of leaks and blockages to repair. In some places the system is beyond repair. We are consistently over budget for our water and sewer utility due to the unexpected expense of purchasing parts and paying our crew to repair and replace section of the distribution system. The outdated system drastically hinders community expansion efforts. The City of Port Lions are working closely with the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (ANTHC) for replacement project to be included in their funding pipeline as soon as possible. 4. City of Larsen Bay: Water Distribution Lines Estimated Project Cost $7,000,000.00 The City of Larsen Bay has a problem of leaks in the distribution system. We have a loss of 40,000 gallons of water every 24 hours, 7 days a week. We have fixed all the leaks we could find. In the summer we have a hard time keeping up with the water usage. 5. Karluk Water Storage Tank Total Cost: $1,882,087 Funding Already Acquired: $987,094 Requested Amount: $223,000 The purchase sand contracted labor for the water storage tank itself was recently quoted to ANTHC at $223,000. The rest of the project costs include the foundation construction, access road to the new Kodiak Island Borough, Alaska Resolution No. FY2026-02 Page 2 of 7 Page 105 of 149 Assembly Review Of State And Federal CIP Lists AGENDA ITEM #2.b. 102 tank, and the 1500 ft. transmission line. 103 ANTHC has two active projects in Karluk to deal with their water treatment and distribution 104 system. One project is to replace the water treatment plant, and the second project is to 105 replace the water storage tank and construct and transmission line pipe from the new tank 106 site back tot eh water plant. Both projects are planned to be constructed together to be as 107 efficient as possible. We are requesting funding for the water tank as there is a funding 108 shortfall. 109 The water storage tank and transmission line project has completed engineering design 110 and we are in construction preparation, however, the preparation has stalled because of a 111 funding shortage. This project was funded for $987,094, and we are seeking an additional 112 $894,993 to complete. The original funding division for this project is $924,390 from the 113 Indian Health Service and $62,704 from the Denali Commission, which covers the 114 ineligible costs that the Indian Health Service cannot cover. 115 There are a couple of things that should be noted about the water tank project: 116 We are not planning on using the water tank currently in Karluk as the configuration 117 does not meet current requirements for seismic activity in the Kodiak Region. The 118 high earthquake probability would potentially cause the crated tank currently in 119 Karluk to get damaged and collapse if the water inside moved around. 120 121 The community has been in violation of the Surface Water Treatment Rule drinking 122 standards since they were updated in 2005 because of the overall configuration of 123 the water treatment plant and water storage tank. In 2005, a modular water 124 treatment plant facility was constructed by a contract with Udelhoven Oilfeild 125 System, and the final modules are expected to be delivered to the Anchorage- 126 based ANTHC storage facility in August. We are projecting a 2026 construction 127 date for both elements of the water project, provided we can receive the required 128 supplemental funding. I have issued a supplemental funding requires for the water 129 treatment plant project to the State of Alaska Capital Improvements Program (CIP) 130 through ADEC and am awaiting the response. 131 132 6. Karluk Sewer Truck 133 Estimated Project Cost: $150,000 134 The tribe needs a reliable way to pump sewage. Starting at the beginning of July, we are 135 having to manually pump the sewer every few days due to the ongoing issues with the 136 generator and drawing too much power. The sewer pump cannot be on all the time 137 automatically until the generator issue is resolved. Cost includes freight. 138 139 7. City of Port Lions Fire Station Insulation 140 Estimated Project Cost $35,000 141 Funding Acquired $0.00 142 Needed Funds $35,000 143 The fire station in the second-class City of Port Lions is not insulated which necessitates 144 that the fire truck be left empty of water during the winter months when temperatures drop 145 below freezing and limits the time and ability to response to a fire related emergency. The 146 City of Port Lions requests funds for purchase and installation of building insulation 147 materials. 148 149 8. City of Larsen Bay: Upgrade City Hall 150 Estimated Project Cost $700,000 151 The City Hall building houses the Senior Center, Teen Center, Library, City Market, and 152 City offices. The building was originally built in 1985 and need numerous repairs. The 153 kitchen in the Senior Center is outdated, and cabinets are falling off. The entire building 154 needs to be rewired, replace light switches, outlets, flooring, windows, and doors. The roof 155 needs repairs and is unstable due to water damage. The inside and outside needs to be 156 completely repainted. The restrooms need to be updated and redesigned. All new Kodiak Island Borough, Alaska Resolution No. FY2026-02 Page 3 of 7 Assembly Review Of State And Federal CIP Lists Page 106 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.b. 157 plumbing needs to be installed. 158 159 9. Kodiak Island Borough Fire & Rescue: Phase 1 Design & Engineering RE: Fire 160 Station Renovation & Expansion FY26 161 Estimated Project Cost $312,000.00 162 The Fire Protection Area 1 has the following campus upgrade, expansion, & renovation 163 plan for consideration under the CIP Plan by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The 164 plan encompasses priority components of the Fire Department's Long-range Strategic 165 plans. The primary focus is to ensure the continued robust response model of 166 professionally trained emergency personnel, who are predominately paid on call stipend 167 employees. The expansion and renovation encompass 2 main phases which may or may 168 not occur concurrently. First is the addition of a 600 square foot structure on the western 169 side of the existing apparatus bay to house the fitness center. Also in Phase 1 is the 170 construction of a 3-story combination training and hose drying tower behind the fitness 171 center addition. Phase 1 is completed by a renovation of the second -floor area now 172 housing a combination lounge / bunk room and fitness center. This will allow for a kitchen, 173 lounge, dorm style bunk rooms and a lavatory with locker and shower facilities. 174 Phase Two will comprise renovation of the existing classroom area and existing kitchen 175 and Chiefs Quarters. 176 The request is for funding to facilitate the planning, permitting, and design phase of the 177 renovation/construction project. The funding request has not changed from FY25 CIP 178 application. 179 180 10. St. Herman Harbor Infrastructure Replacement 181 Estimated Project Cost: 182 • Phase 1 $23,000,000 183 • Phase II $33,000,000 184 • Phase III $50,000,000 185 • Phase IV $66,000,000 186 • Funding Acquired For Phase 1 $11,750,000 187 • Needed Funds $160,250,000 188 The City of Kodiak is the owner of the two largest harbors in the Kodiak Island Borough, 189 one of those harbors, St. Herman Harbor (SHH), was built by the State of Alaska in 1982 190 and has been a vital facility for Kodiak's large and diverse commercial fishing fleet for over 191 40 years. The State of Alaska turned over all state-owned facilities in St. Harman Harbor to 192 the City of Kodiak in 1999. The facility provides safe moorage for more than 400 vessels 193 from all over Alaska and the West Coast. Except for a few minor upgrades over the years, 194 the original float system is beyond its useful life and is in critical need of replacement. The 195 proposed project would result in the reconstruction of St. Harman Harbor with the 196 replacement of most of its float system in four phases. Currently, the harbor has been 197 losing one dock per year due to aging and the saltwater elements. A dock loss results in 2 198 vessel berths along with the revenue generated for the harbor. This rate of failure is likely 199 to increase in future years as the existing docks further deteriorate. The latest inspection 200 report shows many portions of the facility are in very poor condition. The forty -year -old float 201 systems suffer from failing concrete, rotting walers and bull rails, and an outdated electrical 202 system. These floats contain electrical pedestals, fire suppression water lines, safety 203 ladders and supply water. 204 In 2022, the City contracted with PND Engineers, Inc. (PND) to prepare a St. Harmon 205 Harbor Planning and Scoping Report that includes concept harbor layouts, cost estimates 206 and construction phasing recommendations. The Kodiak Island Borough supports the City 207 of Kodiak request of $16 million to complete the first two phases. Phases III & IV estimated 208 project development cost is approximately $40,000,000. 209 Modernizing and expanding the port infrastructure is critical to remaining competitive in 210 maintaining our status as an important commercial fishing community. Waterfront facilities 211 and marine infrastructure are a critical element to the City of Kodiak and the State of Kodiak Island Borough, Alaska Resolution No. FY2026-02 Page 4 of 7 Page 107 of 149 Assembly Review Of State And Federal CIP Lists AGENDA ITEM #2.b. 212 Alaska, supporting a large portion of the City's commerce, industry, transportation, and 213 recreational needs. 214 215 11. City of Old Harbor Septic Tank Replacement 216 Estimated Project Cost $100,000 217 Funding Acquired $0.00 218 Needed Funds $100,000 219 The Kodiak Island Borough supports the City of Old Harbor's request for funding to install a 220 sewer septic tank in downtown Old Harbor which is a second-class city within the Kodiak 221 Island Borough. 222 223 12. Kodiak Community Health Center Expansion 224 Estimated Total Project Cost $25.850,000 225 Funding Acquired $8,317,901 226 Estimated Design Cost $1,200,000 227 Needed Funds $1,200,000 228 The Kodiak Community Health Center (KCHC) is currently housed within the Kodiak Island 229 Borough owned hospital facility and co -located with Providence Kodiak Island Medical 230 Center. KCHC is in need of increasing the clinic space and is planning an expansion 231 project. Due to various changes in the community in the past five years, patient and 232 provider counts have increased and pushed this organization to the maximum of their 233 space limitations. Additionally, an increased in -patient population is expected to coincide 234 with a local US Coast Guard base increase in employees and their families in the next few 235 years. 236 With appropriate funding KCHC proposes to expand and improve the clinic space and 237 continue to provide needed services in the Kodiak Community. KCHC has acquired 238 funding in the amount of $8.3 million toward this project, however design activities are not 239 eligible within this funding. KCHC is seeking design funds in order to move forward with the 240 project and will continue fund raising efforts for the balance needed. 241 242 13. Hospital Facility Sterilizer and Boiler Replacement 243 Estimated Project Cost: $10,000,000 244 • Funding Acquired $0.00 245 • Needed Funds $10,000,000 246 The Kodiak Island Borough owned hospital facility boilers and associated system 247 components are aging along with the facility. The system components that been identified 248 for major repair or replacement include the oil -fired boilers, chiller unit, reverse osmosis 249 water system, steam generation equipment and sterilization equipment are in 250 consideration. The oil -fired boilers provide the major hydronic heating component for 251 several associated systems at the hospital facility. They include the production of facility 252 heat, hot water and the hot water component for conversion to steam via a steam 253 generator that is distributed to the sterilizers required for the hospital operations. The 254 sterilizer equipment has been maintained at an operational level. Due to the age of the 255 existing equipment, increased frequent failures associated with the steam generator and 256 sterilization equipment has affected the operational capacity of the hospital to the point 257 where operating room availability is managed at times with the functional capacity of the 258 facility to ensure property sterilized equipment. All of the system components need to be 259 evaluated for replacement timeframes as and of the individual component failures may 260 lead to services being suspended at the hospital facility. 261 262 14. City of Larsen Bay: Equipment Repairs and Maintenance 263 Estimated Project Cost $157,000.00 Kodiak Island Borough, Alaska Resolution No. FY2026-02 Page 5 of 7 Page 108 of 149 Assembly Review Of State And Federal CIP Lists AGENDA ITEM #2.b. 264 The City of Larsen Bay's existing equipment are all needing major parts and pieces 265 maintained and/or replaced. The City currently has a 1996 Caterpillar 12G Grader, a 2001 266 Caterpillar 416 backhoe-loader 4WD, and a 2001 Caterpillar D-4 Dozer. These pieces of 267 equipment are vital to the Community for water lines, power lines, road repairs, and 268 maintenance, and is needed to keep our city going. 269 270 15. Native Village of Karluk: Karluk Community Food Security Project 271 Estimated Project Cost $139,444.00 272 The community of Karluk is requesting to construct two community greenhouses on land 273 owned by the tribe (map attached). The project is clear and significant priority for Karluk as 274 food is limited. Global warming is changing the ocean environment and impacting 275 subsistence. Food is flown to the community by small plane that are often delayed by 276 weather and the cost is prohibitively high and the food is mostly shelf stable, meaning 277 highly processed and not the appropriate food for our tribe. Karluk does not have gasoline 278 for sale so the cost of subsistence has become prohibitively high and harvesting 279 subsistence fish and game by ATV or boat is nearly impossible. The Covid-19 pandemic 280 emphasized the importance of food sovereignty for our remote community. During the 281 pandemic, supply chains were interrupted and the price for many goods increased greatly. 282 As remote as we are with high costs already, interruptions to supply chains and increased 283 prices were nearly impossible for our village to handle. Because of this, we have renewed 284 our efforts to grow fresh vegetables and fruits as we work to provide consistent and 285 traditional food for our village. The proposed project is to purchase and construct two 286 community greenhouses on land owned by the trib. The proposed site is Karluk 287 Subdivision Tract C, Plat Number 78-16. The tribe will be responsible for the upkeep and 288 maintenance of the greenhouses. The greenhouses will be constructed with guidance from 289 the Alaska Energy Authority Biomass -Heated Greenhouses: A Handbook for Alaskan 290 Schools and Community Organizations and the University of Alaska Fairbanks Master 291 Gardener program; a Master Gardener assisted Karluk with the development of this 292 proposal. The two greenhouses will be 25' x 48' x 12.5', made with heavy-duty galvanized 293 steel frame and 10 mm double -wall polycarbonate panels, 2 doors and 2double-door gates 294 (one on each end), and an arched design allows wind, snow and hail to slide off. The 295 greenhouse will support a snow load of 480 kg/m (98 psf) and is wind -resistant up to 24m/s 296 for high stability. The greenhouse is an expandable design. The greenhouses will use a 297 biomass boiler to heat the interior of the greenhouse each spring when we begin planting. 298 The project will also include the purchase of shelving and supplies including soil, fertilizer, 299 water equipment, pots and stakes. The cost of freight to Karluk from Wasilla and the cost 300 to assemble the greenhouse is also included in the cost estimate. Greenhouses are prices 301 $29,500 each and the boilers are priced at $8432 each. Shelving and supplies is estimated 302 at $3,000. The total cost of materials is $78,864. Freight is estimated at 50% ($39,432) and 303 a contingency is included of 15% to offset any increase in cost ($11,830). 304 Total material cost is estimated at $130,126. The cost of assembling the greenhouse is 305 estimated at 80 hours for three laborers at $35 per hour ($8,400) plus fringe at 10.93% 306 ($918). The total project cost is $139,444. A resolution, a map outlining the location of the 307 site, and quotes are attached. The greenhouse will provide access to fresh healthy food 308 which is at this time either unavailable or prohibitively expensive and will improve the 309 quality of life for all the residents of Karluk. 310 311 16. Service Area No. 1 Road Improvements and Paving 312 Estimated Project Cost $6,000,000 313 Local Funds $1,200,000 314 Needed Funds $4,800,000 315 This project addresses the on -going need to improve portions of the roads in the Kodiak 316 Island Borough's Road services areas: Service Area No. 1, Service Area, Bay View Road 317 Service Area, and Monashka Bay Road Service Area. These roads connect residential Kodiak Island Borough, Alaska Resolution No. FY2026-02 Page 6 of 7 Page 109 of 149 Assembly Review Of State And Federal CIP Lists AGENDA ITEM #2.b. 318 neighborhoods with the greater Kodiak Community. 319 Paving projects will address main thoroughfares or busy neighborhood roads. 320 Improvements to major drainage courses, installation of guard rails, and other identified 321 road improvement needs may also be addressed with this funding. 322 Priorities for expenditure of these funds are determined by the road service area boards. 323 Local contributions to road improvements may be funded through local improvement 324 districts where those in the district are taxed a proportion of the project cost. 325 326 17. Women's Bay Service District: South Russian Creek Road Repaving 327 Estimated Project Cost $1,842,301.30 328 The roadway was originally paved circa 1985 using mostly federal financing under the 329 Intermodal Service Transportation Efficiency Act. Since that time the roadway has been 330 maintained by the Womens Bay Service District with taxes collected from the residents for 331 that purpose. The Service District mill rate is currently 2.5 mils which is the highest of all 332 service districts. The current budget has barely been sufficient to keep roads cleared of 333 snow and ice and also maintain the 12 miles of road in the district. Over the years the 334 maintenance for the South Russian Creek Road paved area has increased as the asphalt 335 has deteriorated and at this time maintenance attempts are becoming futile and 336 exponentially more expensive. The estimate from Brechans Construction, LLC to repave 337 the Roadway is $1,842,301.30 (see attached estimate). If the road is repaved, it would 338 reduce the overall maintenance costs and allow the service district to re -allocate money to 339 other needed projects. 340 341 342 ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE KODIAK ISLAND 343 BOROUGH 344 THE 17t' DAY OF September 2025 345 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH 346 34 348 349 ATTEST Sara Fraser, Chair 350 e;; I V� i f— Gm I(' 351 eel 352 l'1 353 Bronwyn Currie, Assistant Planner Kodiak Island Borough, Alaska Resolution No. FY2026-02 Page 7 of 7 Assembly Review Of State And Federal CIP Lists Page 110 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2.b. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH RESOLUTION NO. FY2025-16 A RESOLUTION OF THE ASSEMBLY OF THE KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ADOPTING A STATE LEGISLATIVE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS PRIORITY LIST FOR THE 2025 LEGISLATIVE SESSION WHEREAS, the Kodiak Island Borough represents approximately 12,721 residents of the Kodiak Island Archipelago living in six incorporated cities and one community governed by a tribal council government per the Alaska Department of Labor and Work Force Development; and WHEREAS, a Borough —wide capital improvement program has been adopted by the Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission which identifies major needs of the island community for the next five years; and WHEREAS, the Kodiak Island Borough Assembly has reviewed the borough -wide capital improvement program adopted by the Planning and Zoning Commission and identified major projects to submit to the Alaska Governor, State Legislative Delegation, and Federal Legislative Delegation for funding consideration. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE ASSEMBLY OF THE KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH that: Section 1: The Kodiak Island Borough's State Legislative capital improvement project priorities (unranked) for the 2025 legislative session are as follows: • Kodiak Wastewater Treatment Plant Facility Estimated Project Cost $1,900,000 Funding Acquired $100,000 Needed Funds $1,800,000 The City of Kodiak provides water and sewer services to the Kodiak Island Borough residences and businesses that are located adjacent to City of Kodiak boundaries. The City of Kodiak treatment plant operates under an Alaskan Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC) APDES permits. The first phase of a larger project to upgrade the City of Kodiak Wastewater Treatment Plant to evaluate the facility for immediate system's needs. The last major maintenance upgrades to the facility was in 1999. The condition and evaluation assessment included all major components within the plant interior and exterior, the outbuildings and three aeration basins; including all mechanical equipment needs. Alaska Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (APDES) permitting requirements were included during this assessment. Included in the facility rebuild assessment is the supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system to interface with the 34 sewer lift station pumps and waste treatment at the facility. This facility, with its labyrinth of connecting sewer lines, directly Resolution No. FY2025-16 Page 1 of 8 Page 111 of 149 Assembly Review Of State And Federal CIP Lists AGENDA ITEM #2.b. 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 serves 2667 City of Kodiak and Kodiak Borough households including commercial businesses. The treatment plant also serves the U.S. Kodiak Coast Guard Base and the Pacific Spaceport Complex indirectly with our certified laboratory testing and waste disposal; not to mention NOAA vessels, the Alaska Marine Highway vessels and the expanding cruise ship industry stopovers in our Kodiak Harbors. The Kodiak Island Borough supports the City of Kodiak request for Federal funding in the amount of $1.9M to begin design efforts leading to the construction of this critical infrastructure Wastewater Treatment Plant project that will support the wastewater needs of the community for the next twenty years. • St. Herman Harbor Infrastructure Replacement Phase 1 $10,000,000 St. Herman Harbor (SHH) was built by the State of Alaska in 1982 and has been a vital facility for Kodiak's large and diverse commercial fishing, logistics, and subsistence fleet for over 40 years. The State of Alaska turned over all state owned facilities in St. Herman Harbor to the City of Kodiak in 1999. The facility provides safe moorage for more than 400 vessels from local, other Alaskan communities and the West Coast. With the exception of a few minor upgrades over the years, and annual maintenance the original float system is beyond its useful life and is in need of replacement. The proposed project would result in the reconstruction of St. Herman Harbor with the replacement of most of its float system in two phases. Currently, the harbor has been losing use of multiple floats per year due to aging and the saltwater elements, and increased storm activity, both in frequency and severity. Any float loss results in 2 vessel berths along with the revenue generated for the harbor. This rate of failure has increased exponentially in recent years as the existing docks further deteriorate. The latest inspection report shows many portions of the facility are in very poor condition. The forty -year -old float systems suffer from failing pilings, broken concrete decking, rotting walers and bull rails, and an outdated electrical system. These floats contain non -compliant electrical pedestals, failed fire suppression lines, no blackwater services and inconsistent potable water availability. In 2022, the City contracted with PND Engineers, Inc. (PND) to prepare a St. Herman Harbor Planning and Scoping Report that includes concept harbor layouts, cost estimates and construction phasing recommendations. The harbor replacement is scheduled in two phases, with the City funding of $1,900,000 to begin the project. Total estimated cost is at $73-99 million. In the fall of 2024, the City was awarded a $11,250,000 grant from MARAD's Port Infrastructure Development Program to be used for phase one of the project. Phase one will see construction of a new "O" float with critically needed large vessel (100-foot plus) berthing, and a drive down dock capability. Initially, this float will be used to provide necessary berthing Resolution No. FY2025-16 Page 2 of 8 Page 112 of 149 Assembly Review Of State And Federal CIP Lists AGENDA ITEM #2.b. 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 III 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 to facilitate the rebuild. Phase one is estimated at between $23-33 million. In 2023, Turnagain Marine Construction was awarded a competitive contract to complete preliminary design and environmental permitting for the harbor reconstruction with an estimated completion of early 2026. We would like to thank the Alaska Congressional Delegation for its support for this project with the Dept. of Transportation and MARAD. Pending in FY 2025 appropriations is $10 million in Congressionally Directed Spending in the Senate Transportation -Housing Urban Development Appropriations Bill for the St. Herman Harbor project. We would like to thank Senator Murkowski for requesting these funds. The funds would be used to fund additional design and construction costs for Phase 1. The City of Kodiak is requesting that the $10 million in Congressionally Directed Spending be retained in the final FY 2025 appropriations bill, or if not rolled over into FY 2026. • Service Area Roads Improvements and Paving Estimated Project Cost $6,000,000 Local Funds $1,200,000 Needed Funds $4,800,000 This project addresses the on -going need to improve portions of the roads in the Kodiak Island Borough's Road service areas: Service Area No. 1, Womens Bay Service Area, Bay View Road Service Area, and Monashka Bay Road Service Area. These roads connect residential neighborhoods with the greater Kodiak community. Paving projects will address main thoroughfares or busy neighborhood roads. Improvements to major drainage courses, installation of guard rails, and other identified road improvement needs may also be addressed with this funding. Priorities for expenditure of these funds are determined by the road service area boards. Local contributions to road improvements may be funded through local improvement districts where those in the district are taxed a proportion of the project cost. • Hospital Facility Sterilizer and Boiler Replacement Estimated Project Cost $10,000,000 Funding Acquired $0 Needed Funds $10,000,000 The Kodiak Island Borough owned hospital facility boilers and associated system components are aging along with the facility. The system components that have been identified for major repair or replacement include the oil -fired boilers, chiller unit, reverse osmosis water system, steam generation equipment and sterilization equipment are in consideration. The oil -fired boilers provide the major hydronic heating component for several associated systems at the hospital facility. They include the production of facility heat, hot water and the hot water Resolution No. FY2025-16 Page 3 of 8 Page 113 of 149 Assembly Review Of State And Federal CIP Lists AGENDA ITEM #2.b. 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 component for conversion to steam via a steam generator that is distributed to the sterilizers required for the hospital operations. The sterilizer equipment has been maintained at an operational level. Due to the age of the existing equipment, increased frequent failures associated with the steam generator and sterilization equipment has affected the operational capacity of the hospital to the point where operating room availability is managed at times with the functional capacity of the facility to ensure properly sterilized equipment. All of the system components need to be evaluated for replacement timeframes as and of the individual component failures may lead to services being suspended at the hospital facility. • City of Larsen Bay Reservoir Spill Way Estimated Project Cost $1,200,000 Funding Acquired $0 Needed Funds $1,200,000 The water reservoir spill way in the community of Larsen Bay is eroding and is nearing failure. This reservoir provides drinking water and hydroelectric power to the residents in the second- class city on Kodiak Island's west side. The Kodiak Island Borough supports the second-class City of Larsen Bay's request for funding assistance. • City of Port Lions Fire Station Insulation Estimated Project Cost $35,000 Funding Acquired $0 Needed Funds $35,000 The fire station in the second-class City of Port Lions is not insulation which necessitates that the fire truck be left empty of water during the winter months when temperatures drop below freezing and limits the time and ability to respond to a fire related emergency. The City of Port Lions requests funds for purchase and installation of building insulation materials. • Kodiak Island Borough Fire and Rescue: Phase 1 Design and Engineering Re: Fire Station Renovation and Expansion FY25 Estimated Project Cost $312,000 The proposed project shall include the following in Phase 1: Full design and engineer workup to include shovel ready plan set and accompanying specification documents. The scope of the project may include renovation of certain existing areas of the original 1983 fire station building and training facility addition. The scope may further include expanding the footprint and square footage of the original 1983 fire station building to include additional space capable of sustaining the current response and service delivery model in keeping with an established 30 year strategic/fiscal plan. The expansion shall include additional square footage to the rear of the existing kitchen, lavatory, and mechanical space and second floor living space. The expansion may include space designed to support additional/upgraded lavatories and shower facilities along with sleeping accommodations for volunteer duty officers/firefighters and Resolution No. FY2025-16 Page 4 of 8 Page 114 of 149 Assembly Review Of State And Federal CIP Lists AGENDA ITEM #2.b. 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 additional living and storage space to the second floor. Necessary code compliance work to the existing structure shall be included in this project scope. • Kodiak Community Health Center Expansion Estimated Total Project Cost $25,850,000 Funding acquired $8,317,901 Estimated Design Cost $1,200,000 Needed Funds $1,200,000 The Kodiak Community Health Center (KCHC) is currently housed within the Kodiak Island Borough owned hospital facility and co -located with Providence Kodiak Island Medical Center. KCHC is in need of increasing the clinic space and is planning an expansion project. Due to various changes in the community in the past five years, patient and provider counts have increased and pushed this organization to the maximum of their space limitations. Additionally, an increase in patient population is expected to coincide with a local US Coast Guard base increase in employees and their families in the next few years. With appropriate funding KCHC proposes to expand and improve the clinic space and continue to provide needed services in the Kodiak community. KCHC has acquired funding in the amount of $8.3 million toward this project, however design activities are not eligible within this funding. KCHC is seeking design funds in order to move forward with the project and will continue fund raising efforts for the balance needed. • City of Old Harbor Septic Tank Replacement Estimated Project Cost $100,000 Funding Acquired $0 Needed Funds $100,000 The Kodiak Island Borough supports the City of Old Harbor's request for funding to Install a sewer septic tank in downtown Old Harbor which is a second-class city within the Kodiak Island Borough. • Community of Karluk Water Tank Installation Estimated Project Cost $250,000 Local Funds $0 Needed Funds $250,000 The water holding tank in the community of Karluk has been condemned by the DEC. The Karluk IRA Tribal Council has a new water tank sitting in the Native Village of Karluk. The Kodiak Island Borough supports this request for funds to install the water tank for the water distribution to this community that lies within the Kodiak Island Borough. • City of Larsen Bay Equipment Repairs and Maintenance Resolution No. FY2025-16 Page 5 of 8 Page 115 of 149 Assembly Review Of State And Federal CIP Lists AGENDA ITEM #2.b. 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 Estimated Project Cost $157,000 The City of Larsen Bay's existing equipment are all needing major parts and pieces maintained and/or replaced. The City currently has a 1996 Caterpillar 12G Grader, a 2001 Caterpillar416 backhoe-Ioader4WD, and a 2001 Caterpillar D-4 Dozer. These pieces of equipment are vital to the Community for water lines, power lines, road repairs, and maintenance, and is needed to keep our city going. • Women's Bay Service District: South Russian Creek Road Repaving FY25 Estimated Project Cost $1,842,301.30 The roadway was originally paved circa 1985 using mostly federal financing under the Intermodal Service Transportation Efficiency Act. Since that time the roadway has been maintained by the Womens Bay Service District with taxes collected from the residents for that purpose. The Service District mill rate is currently 2.5 mils which is the highest of all service districts. The current budget has barely been sufficient to keep roads cleared of snow and ice and also maintain the 12 miles of road in the district. Over the years the maintenance for the South Russian Creek Road paved area has increased as the asphalt has deteriorated and at this time maintenance attempts are becoming futile and exponentially more expensive. The estimate from Brechan Construction, LLC to repave the roadway is $1,842,301.30. If the road is repaved, it would reduce the overall maintenance costs and allow the service district to re -allocate money to other needed projects. • City of Port Lions Water Distribution System Replacement Estimated Project Cost $8,000,000 Funding Acquired $0.00 Needed Funds $8,000,000 The original water and sewer distribution system for our community was built after the 1964 Good Friday earthquake and tsunami forced the displaced residents of Afognak to relocate in what is now known as Port Lions. In 1964, a new system was installed. However, the contractor did not complete the job correctly. Many homes were not connected to the new system and many homes were connected incorrectly. The now connected system is considered aged out because it is over twenty-five years old. The City of Port Lions Public Works crew constantly has a list of leaks and blockages to repair. In some places the system is beyond repair. They are consistently over budget for water and sewer utility due to the unexpected expense of purchasing parts and paying their crew to repair and replace section of the distribution system. The outdated system drastically hinders community expansion efforts. The City of Port Lions is working closely with the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (ANTHC) for replacement project to be included in their funding pipeline as soon as possible. • City of Larsen Bay: Water Distribution Lines Estimated Project Cost $7,000,000 The City of Larsen Bay has a problem of leaks in the distribution system. They have a loss of 40,000 gallons of water every 24 hours, 7 days a week. They have fixed all the leaks they could find. In the summer, they have a hard time keeping up with the water usage. Resolution No. FY2025-16 Page 6 of 8 Page 116 of 149 Assembly Review Of State And Federal CIP Lists AGENDA ITEM #2.b. 265 • City of Larsen Bay: Upgrade City Hall 266 Estimated Project Cost $700,000 267 268 The City Hall building houses the Senior Center, Teen Center, Library, City Market, and City 269 offices. The building was originally built in 1985 and need numerous repairs. The kitchen in 270 the Senior Center is outdated, and cabinets are falling off. The entire building needs to be 271 rewired, replace light switches, outlets, flooring, windows, and doors. The roof needs repairs 272 and is unstable due to water damage. The inside and outside needs to be completely 273 repainted. The restrooms need to be updated and redesigned. All new plumbing needs to be 274 installed. 275 276 Native Village of Karluk: Karluk Community Food Security Project FY25 277 Estimated Project Cost $139,444 278 279 The community of Karluk is requesting to construct two community greenhouses on land 280 owned by the tribe. The project is clear and significant priority for Karluk as food is limited. 281 Global warming is changing the ocean environment and impacting subsistence. Food is flown 282 to the community by small plane that are often delayed by weather and the cost is prohibitively 283 high and the food is mostly shelf stable, meaning highly processed and not the appropriate 284 food for the tribe. Karluk does not have gasoline for sale so the cost of subsistence has 285 become prohibitively high and harvesting subsistence fish and game by ATV or boat is nearly 286 impossible. 287 288 The Covid-19 pandemic emphasized the importance of food sovereignty for this remote 289 community. During the pandemic, supply chains were interrupted and the price for many 290 goods increased greatly. As remote as they are with high costs already, interruptions to supply 291 chains and increased prices were nearly impossible for the village to handle. Because of this, 292 they have renewed their efforts to grow fresh vegetables and fruits as they work to provide 293 consistent and traditional food for the village. 294 295 The proposed project is to purchase and construct two community greenhouses on land 296 owned by the tribe. The proposed site is Karluk Subdivision Tract C, Plat Number 78-16. The 297 tribe will be responsible for the upkeep and maintenance of the greenhouses. The 298 greenhouses will be constructed with guidance from the Alaska Energy Authority Biomass- 299 Heated Greenhouses: A Handbook for Alaskan Schools and Community Organizations and 300 the University of Alaska Fairbanks Master Gardener program; a Master Gardener assisted 301 Karluk with the development of this proposal. The two greenhouses will be 25' x 48' x 12.5, 302 made with heavy-duty galvanized steel frame and 10 mm double -wall polycarbonate panels, 303 2 doors and 2double-door gates (one on each end), and an arched design allows wind, snow 304 and hail to slide off. The greenhouse will support a snow load of 480 kg/m (98 pso and is 305 wind -resistant up to 24m/s for high stability. The greenhouse is an expandable design. The 306 greenhouses will use a biomass boiler to heat the interior of the greenhouse each spring when 307 they begin planting. 308 309 This project will also include the purchase of shelving and supplies including soil, fertilizer, 310 water equipment, pots and stakes. The cost of freight to Karluk from Wasilla and the cost to 311 assemble the greenhouse is also included in the cost estimate. Greenhouses are priced 312 $29,500 each and the boilers are priced at $8432 each. Shelving and supplies is estimated at 313 $3,000. The total cost of materials is $78,864. Freight is estimated at 50% ($39,432) and a 314 contingency is included of 15% to offset any increase in cost ($11,830). Total material cost is Resolution No. FY2025-16 Page 7 of 8 Page 117 of 149 Assembly Review Of State And Federal CIP Lists AGENDA ITEM #2.b. 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 estimated at $130,126. The cost of assembling the greenhouse is estimated at 80 hours for three laborers at $35 per hour ($8,400) plus fringe at 10.93% ($918). The total project cost is $139,444. The greenhouse will provide access to fresh healthy food which is at this time either unavailable or prohibitively expensive and will improve the quality of life for all the residents of Karluk. • Rehabilitation of Kodiak Island Borough Park Estimated Project Cost $300,000 Funding Acquired $150,000 Needed Funds $150,000 Kodiak Island Borough has started a multi -year project to upgrade end of life playground equipment, benches, picnic tables, and basketball courts. This project aims to provide multiple areas for outdoor recreation in multiple areas across the borough. ADOPTED BY THE ASSEMBLY OF THE KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH THIS TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH Scott Arndt, Mayor VOTES: Ayes: Johnson, LeDoux, Smiley, and Whiteside Absent: Ames, Griffin, and Sharratt Resolution No. FY2025-16 ATTEST. Nova M Javier, MMC Borough Clerk Page 8 of 8 Page 118 of 149 Assembly Review Of State And Federal CIP Lists AGENDA ITEM #2.b. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH RESOLUTION NO. FY2025-17 A RESOLUTION OF THE ASSEMBLY OF THE KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH IDENTIFYING FEDERAL PROJECT AND PROGRAM PRIORITIES FOR FEDERAL FISCAL YEARS 2025 AND 2026 WHEREAS, the Alaska Congressional Delegation has requested the views of the Kodiak Island Borough on which Federal projects and programs should be considered priorities, in no particular order, for rural Alaskan communities and their residents. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE ASSEMBLY OF THE KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH that the Kodiak Island Borough's views and recommendations on priority Federal programs and projects for FY 2026 are as follows: 1. FY 2026 Community Project/Congressionally Directed Spending Requests: The Borough submits the following FY 2026 community project/Congressionally directed spending requests, consistent with guidance issued by the House and Senate Appropriations Committees. • St. Herman Harbor Infrastructure Replacement. (Phase 1 - $10,000,000). St. Herman Harbor (SHH) was built by the State of Alaska in 1982 and has been a vital facility for Kodiak's large and diverse commercial fishing, logistics, and subsistence fleet for over 40 years. The State of Alaska turned over-all state-owned facilities in St. Herman Harbor to the City of Kodiak in 1999. The facility provides safe moorage for more than 400 vessels from local, other Alaskan communities and the West Coast. With the exception of a few minor upgrades over the years, and annual maintenance the original float system is beyond its useful life and is in need of replacement. The proposed project would result in the reconstruction of St. Herman Harbor with the replacement of most of its float system in two phases. Currently, the harbor has been losing use of multiple floats per year due to aging and the saltwater elements, and increased storm activity, both in frequency and severity. Any float loss results in 2 vessel berths along with the revenue generated for the harbor. This rate of failure has increased exponentially in recent years as the existing docks further deteriorate. The latest inspection report shows many portions of the facility are in very poor condition. The forty - year old float systems suffer from failing pilings, broken concrete decking, rotting walers and bullrails, and an outdated electrical system. These floats contain non -compliant electrical pedestals, failed fire suppression lines, no blackwater services and inconsistent potable water availability. In 2022, the City contracted with PND Engineers, Inc. (PND) to prepare a St. Herman Harbor Planning and Scoping Report that includes concept harbor layouts, cost estimates and construction phasing recommendations. The harbor replacement is scheduled in two Resolution No. FY2025-17 Page 1 of 6 Page 119 of 149 Assembly Review Of State And Federal CIP Lists AGENDA ITEM #2.b. 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 phases, with the City funding of $1,900,000 to begin the project. Total estimated cost is at $73-99 million. In the fall of 2024, the City was awarded a $11,250,000 grant from MARAD's Port Infrastructure Development Program to be used for phase one of the project. Phase one will see construction of a new "O" float with critically needed large vessel (100-foot plus) berthing, and a drive down dock capability. Initially, this float will be used to provide necessary berthing to facilitate the rebuild. Phase one is estimated at between $23-33 million. In 2023, Turnagain Marine Construction was awarded a competitive contract to complete preliminary design and environmental permitting for the harbor reconstruction with an estimated completion of early 2026. We would like to thank the Alaska Congressional Delegation for its support for this project with the Dept. of Transportation and MARAD. Pending in FY 2025 appropriations is $10 million in Congressionally Directed Spending in the Senate Transportation -Housing Urban Development Appropriations Bill for the St. Herman Harbor project. We would like to thank Senator Murkowski for requesting these funds. The funds would be used to fund additional design and construction costs for Phase 1. The City of Kodiak is requesting that the $10 million in Congressionally Directed Spending be retained in the final FY 2025 appropriations bill, or if not rolled over into FY 2026. • Russian River Erosion Control Project: Over a number of years, the Russian River has experienced significant erosion due to flooding, shifts in and bifurcation of river channels, and increased sedimentation. This erosion in areas has reached the point where it is damaging and will further damage public and private property in the Bells Flats neighborhood in the Borough. This threat extends to homes, public and private land that borders the Russian River, and a public road which is the only road access into and out of a neighborhood. The Borough needs the Corps' expertise to develop both short and long-term solutions to mitigate this threat to this important and vital community on Kodiak Island. Additionally, given the increasing threat of extreme weather events and the importance of federal disaster support, the continued presence of FEMA is crucial to ensuring long-term resilience for neighborhoods affected by flood -related damage. The Corps has informed us that this early study work would cost $200,000 through its Flood Plain Management Services Program. The Borough has indicated its interest with a formal request letter to the Corps; the next step in the process is to request CDS funding from Congress. 2. Broadband Service To Rural Areas: Establishing or improving broadband service to the Borough's rural communities has been a high Federal priority for us for many years. Access to reliable high-speed broadband is not only critical for economic development but also essential for emergency preparedness and disaster response. FEMA, for instance, relies on robust communication networks to provide real-time disaster alerts, coordinate emergency Resolution No. FY2025-17 Page 2 of 6 Page 120 of 149 Assembly Review Of State And Federal CIP Lists AGENDA ITEM #2.b. 89 services and support community resilience in the face of earthquakes, tsunamis, and other 90 natural disasters that affect the Kodiak Island Borough. Deployment of high-speed broadband 91 to rural areas continued in FY 2025 through a mix of Federal programs provided through the 92 American Rescue Plan Act, the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and regular annual Federal 93 appropriations. The primary sources of funding have been or will be through NTIA's Tribal 94 Broadband Program; USDA's Telecommunications Infrastructure Loan Program & 95 Community Connect Grant Program; and the State Broadband Grants Program created by 96 the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. We support continued rollout of these programs in FY 2026 97 and any broadband applications/projects submitted that would expand or improve service to 98 our Island communities. 99 100 3. Groundfish Surveys: Our Federal resolutions over the years have consistently called for 101 maintenance of effort of Federal groundfish trawl surveys in Alaska. This maintenance of effort 102 is needed as part of the Federal science and data -driven fishery management process to 103 establish sustainable groundfish quotas. It has been supported by the Alaska Congressional 104 Delegation for which we are appreciative. This baseline is for six surveys, one of which is 105 dedicated to movement of fish out of historical survey areas. That funding directive is included 106 in the Senate's FY 2025 appropriations bill funding NOAA. We respectfully request that six 107 Alaska groundfish trawl surveys be continued and funded in the final FY 2025 appropriations 108 bill, and for the FY 2026 funding cycle as well. 109 110 5. Russian Seafood Import Ban: The dumping of seafood products by Russia into the U.S. 111 and international markets has driven down the price of Alaska seafood and hurt Alaska 112 harvesters, processors and fisheries -dependent communities like Kodiak. In March of 2023, 113 the Biden Administration issued an executive order to ban direct Russian seafood imports into 114 the U.S. as part of its sanctions for the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Unfortunately, Russia 115 succeeded in bypassing the sanctions by routing its seafood through reprocessing in and 116 export from China to the U.S. To tighten this loophole, in the Biden Administration issued 117 another Executive Order to further ban Russian imports even if it is processed and sold from 118 another country. Lastly, after a group of Alaska fishing interests attended a roundtable meeting 119 organized by Senator Sullivan this summer with the Secretary of Commerce, the Biden 120 Administration raised the issue at the next European Union ministerial to urge E.U. member 121 nations to similarly ban Russian seafood imports. The E.U. issued a communique after the 122 meeting indicated that it would examine the issue in greater depth. We thank the Delegation 123 for earlier introducing legislation to ban these dumping efforts and for pressing the Biden 124 Administration to take action and urge that continuity of effort extended into the new Trump 125 Administration. Over the coming year, we encourage the Delegation to remain vigilant to 126 ensure that Russia does not find other ways to bypass the ban through re-routing seafood 127 through other third -party countries. 128 129 6. Fisheries Disaster Relief: Congress has enacted fisheries disaster relief reform legislation 130 -- the Fishery Resource Disasters Improvement Act -- that qualifies local government loss of 131 raw fish tax revenues as eligible for reimbursement from future Federal fisheries disaster relief 132 funding. This provision is not mandatory and would require the State of Alaska to include Resolution No. FY2025-17 Page 3 of 6 Page 121 of 149 Assembly Review Of State And Federal CIP Lists AGENDA ITEM #2.b. 133 foregone fish taxes as part of its fisheries disaster relief expenditure plans submitted to NOAA. 134 We request the Delegation continue to support adequate appropriations for recent and future 135 approved disaster declarations impacting Kodiak's fisheries. FEMA, too, has been a key 136 partner in disaster recovery for supply chain disruptions and infrastructure damage following 137 extreme weather events in the US, so we ask for support for the availability of FEMA resources 138 when needed to help local fishermen and seafood -dependent communities to recover from 139 federally declared disasters. We thank the Delegation for its support of $300 million in fisheries 140 disaster relief included in the recently enacted Continuing Resolution. 141 142 7. North Pacific Observer Program: Observers are an important part of managing the halibut 143 and groundfish fisheries in the Gulf of Alaska. Gulf of Alaska fishery participants pay into the 144 North Pacific Observer Fund to cover the costs of "partial coverage" for Gulf fishing sectors 145 but there has been a shortfall in funding to cover observer costs in recent years. While 146 Congress did not include the increase in funding for the program that the Borough requested 147 in the FY 2025 appropriations bills, it did include instructions to mitigate the cost impacts on 148 the small vessel fixed gear fleet while the fishery undergoes the transition to electronic 149 monitoring and reporting. We request that an additional $2 million in funding be provided in 150 FY 2026 above base funding along with carryover of language concerning the cost -burdens 151 on the fleet. 152 153 8. U.S. Coast Guard Base -- Kodiak: In recent years, the Coast Guard and Congress has 154 dedicated significant funding for base infrastructure projects, including housing and shoreside 155 infrastructure, to be ready for homeporting the two new each Offshore Patrol and Fast 156 Response Cutters. We very much appreciate the Coast Guard's and Delegation's strong 157 support for these projects and the cutters' homeporting in Kodiak. The Borough is also very 158 interested in Kodiak being a homeport for a new Polar Security Cutter(s) — the Coast Guard's 159 next generation icebreaker -- but we recognize that water depth in Womens Bay cannot 160 support such a deep draft vessel. The Borough supports other locations for a possible 161 icebreaker including an effort by the City to seek Army Corps of Engineers construction of a 162 breakwater and future deep draft dock off Near Island. We urge the Delegation to support that 163 project and be an advocate for Kodiak as a future homeport for a PSC(s). We recognize that 164 there are cost increases and delays in the PSC program, which is not unusual in new major 165 Federal procurements, but appreciate the Delegation's continued support for PSC funding. 166 Lastly, the Senate version of the FY 2025 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) again 167 included a provision that would have included the Coast Guard in the Defense Community 168 Infrastructure Program, thus making local infrastructure projects like renovating our 169 elementary school eligible for DCIP funding, but unfortunately the provision was again 170 dropped from the final bill due to opposition from the House Armed Services Committees over 171 use of DOD funding for projects from another Department. We urge the Delegation to revive 172 the effort for FY 2026, either as part of the FY 2026 NDAA, or creation of a stand-alone Coast 173 Guard project dedicated program as part of the biennial Coast Guard Authorization Bill. 174 175 9. Payment -In -Lieu -of -Taxes (PILT): PILT is a very important revenue source to the Borough, 176 given that there are over 2.8 million acres removed by the Federal Government from local Resolution No. FY2025-17 Page 4 of 6 Page 122 of 149 Assembly Review Of State And Federal CIP Lists AGENDA ITEM #2.b. 177 taxation within our boundaries. This is land that would otherwise be available to the private 178 sector to develop, creating jobs for the residents of Kodiak and our rural Kodiak Island 179 communities. PILT funds supplement Borough resources to provide basic social services, 180 including medical facilities, emergency fire and rescue services, roads, and schools to our 181 island communities. These services are often called upon during federally declared disasters, 182 where FEMA plays a crucial role in coordinating relief efforts. The pending FY 2025 183 appropriations bills provide full funding for PILT. We thank the Delegation for its long-standing 184 support for PILT and urge continued support for full funding in FY 2026. 185 186 10. National Wildlife Refuge Fund ("Refuge Revenue Sharing"): While not as significant as 187 PILT, the National Wildlife Refuge Fund is a critical source of replacement revenue to 188 communities like ours that have the presence of a large Federal wildlife refuge within their 189 boundaries. The Obama, Trump, and Biden Administrations have all sought to terminate 190 appropriations for the Fund but thankfully Congress has rejected these requests, including 191 level funding for the Fund in the pending FY 2025 appropriations bills. The Kodiak Island 192 Borough opposes the termination of appropriations for this important program. The Borough 193 thanks the Delegation for its on -going support and seeks continued level funding in FY 2026. 194 195 11. Essential Air Service (EAS): The Borough's communities are highly reliant on the EAS 196 program, its support to air carriers and its requirements for island community service that 197 otherwise wouldn't exist or would be provided at much higher rates. FEMA, for instance, has 198 historically depended on EAS-supported carriers to transport disaster response teams, 199 medical supplies, and emergency relief resources. In 2024, Congress passed a five-year 200 reauthorization of the FAA, including a five-year extension of EAS. We thank the AK 201 Congressional Delegation for its support of this important legislation and historical support for 202 EAS. The Borough wants to reiterate the need for that support in annual appropriations for 203 the program and requests full funding in FY 2026. 204 205 12. U.S. Military Arctic Presence: The Borough appreciates the Delegation's sustained effort at 206 urging and directing the Department of Defense to further examine the Arctic's strategic 207 interest to the U.S. Russia and China continue to aggressively push their security interests in 208 the region as evidenced in recent years by the joint convoys of their military vessels that 209 entered the U.S. EEZ in the Bering Sea as well as aggressive Russian flight incursions into 210 Alaska -area air space. As has been included in our past Resolutions, selection of Kodiak as 211 a potential military base or staging area as the U.S. expands its security presence in the Arctic 212 is a long-term goal for the Borough. We understand this is a multi -year effort, but the Borough 213 urges that Kodiak stay under consideration with the Delegation and Department of Defense 214 for future Arctic security investment. 215 216 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE ASSEMBLY OF THE KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH that 217 the Kodiak Island Borough administration is hereby instructed to advise Congress, and the 218 appropriate agencies of the United States Federal Government of the Capital Improvement 219 Program and other Federal program priorities adopted by the Kodiak Island Borough Assembly. 220 Resolution No. FY2025-17 Page 5 of 6 Page 123 of 149 Assembly Review Of State And Federal CIP Lists AGENDA ITEM #2.b. 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 ADOPTED BY THE ASSEMBLY OF THE KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH THIS TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH S, ", -, 'y �/- Scott Arndt, Mayor VOTES: Ayes: Johnson, LeDoux, Smiley, and Whiteside Absent: Ames, Griffin, and Sharratt Resolution No. FY2025-17 ATTEST. /�M 0 - , I ou� Nova M. Javier, MMC Borough Clerk Page 6 of 6 Page 124 of 149 Assembly Review Of State And Federal CIP Lists AGENDA ITEM #2. c. KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH STAFF REPORT DECEMBER 16, 2025 ASSEMBLY WORK SESSION SUBJECT: Vehicle Registration Taxes Discussion ORIGINATOR: Aimee Williams, Borough Manager RECOMMENDATION: DISCUSSION: The Kodiak Island Borough Assembly has the option of adjusting the Motor Vehicle Registration Tax. There is a long lead time from when decisions are made at the local level and the resulting change is reflected at the state level. Any adjustments that might be made before December 31, 2025, would not raise/lower the tax rate until January 1, 2027. Several KIB residents have requested that the KIB Assembly have a discussion about this topic before the end of the calendar year. ALTERNATIVES: FISCAL IMPACT: OTHER INFORMATION: Kodiak Island Borough Vehicle Registration Taxes Discussion Page 125 of 149 0 CD X cD (' v 0 X 0 _0 n C fn to O Z3 Biennial Motor Vehicle Registration Tax Monthly Collections * Fiscal Year 2016 - 2025 Fiscal Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 July $ 19,674.20 $ 19,775.40 $ 15,996.96 $ 19,115.76 $ 7,637.84 $ 10,223.04 $ 11,603.04 $ 66,802.12 $ 63,020.00 $ 65,834.28 August $ 20,893.20 $ 22,525.28 $ 20,194.00 $ 10,660.04 $ 22,851.88 $ 13,150.48 $ 16,821.28 $ 65,320.00 $ 72,882.40 $ 68,958.60 September $ 23,208.84 $ 20,482.88 $ 21,265.80 $ 10,941.56 $ 17,861.80 $ 16,479.04 $ 6,816.28 $ 68,172.00 $ 66,874.80 $ 58,015.20 October $ 28,190.64 $ 18,823.20 $ 23,531.76 $ 25,257.68 $ 7,961.68 $ 22,647.64 $ 21,063.40 $ 52,895.40 $ 61,879.20 $ 75,633.20 November $ 18,110.20 $ 18,720.16 $ 16,655.68 $ 17,273.00 $ 16,705.36 $ 22,232.72 $ 5,717.80 $ 47,232.80 $ 45,365.20 $ 50,600.00 December $ 18,316.28 $ 16,818.52 $ 18,756.04 $ 3,827.20 $ 8,132.80 $ 9,976.48 $ 31,417.08 $ 45,770.00 $ 45,374.40 $ 45,558.40 January $ 16,641.88 $ 15,583.88 $ 18,454.28 $ 19,803.00 $ 15,985.00 $ 11,345.44 $ 51,948.72 $ 45,296.20 $ 54,408.80 $ 44,169.20 February $ 14,541.52 $ 12,972.00 $ 12,962.80 $ 8,556.92 $ 7,423.48 $ 16,035.60 $ 58,961.88 $ 39,716.40 $ 48,672.60 $ 43,194.00 March $ 21,268.56 $ 20,968.64 $ 20,654.92 $ 20,171.00 $ 26,883.32 $ 21,069.84 $ 41,280.40 $ 65,669.60 $ 49,854.80 $ 59,487.20 April $ 22,025.72 $ 20,172.84 $ 19,779.08 $ 13,544.24 $ 25,656.04 $ 13,215.80 $ 72,241.16 $ 71,741.60 $ 69,947.60 $ 67,730.40 May $ 21,448.88 $ 24,350.56 $ 23,490.36 $- $ 24,520.76 $ 35,864.36 $ 69,247.48 $ 80,610.40 $ 71,134.40 $ 74,860.40 June $ 28,792.32 $ 23,883.48 $ 26,152.84 $ 71,242.04 $ 33,917.64 $ 37,977.60 $ 71,585.20 $ 71,640.40 $ 79,920.40 $ 78,871.60 $ 253,112.24 $ 235,076.84 $ 237,894.52 $ 220,392.44 $ 215,537.60 $ 230,218.04 $ 458,703.72 $ 720,866.92 $ 729,334.60 $ 732,912.48 Receiving Fund 201 Education 201 Education 201 Education 201 Education 300 Debt 300 Debt 300 Debt 300 Debt 300 Debt 300 Debt Support Support Support Support Service Service Service Service Service Service Mill Rate Equivalent * 0.21 0.18 0.18 0.16 0.15 0.16 0.30 0.45 0.40 0.40 Amounts are presented for the month they were collected by the State (less an 8% collection fee), not when the Borough received the money. The Borough receives the money two months after collection (e.g., money collected in June is paid to the Borough in August). * Ordinance No. FY2019-16 changed where MVRT revenue was deposited from the Education Support Fund to the Debt Service Fund - Schools. *** Mill Rate Equivalent: the amount the area -wide mill rate would have to be increased to replace MVRT revenue to the receiving fund. State converted to a new financial system and payments were delayed. New tax rates went into effect January 2022, Ordinance No. FY2021-16 (adopted December 3, 2020). AGENDA ITEM #2. d. KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH STAFF REPORT DECEMBER 16, 2025 ASSEMBLY WORK SESSION SUBJECT: Discuss Code Change Amending KIBC 3.55.025 To Allocate Part Of The Sales Tax Proceeds From Tourism To Infrastructure Development ORIGINATOR: Bo Whiteside, Assembly Member RECOMMENDATION: Assembly to discuss this request during a work session. DISCUSSION: Assembly Members Bo Whiteside and Dave Johnson submitted the attached Agenda Item Request Form requesting that staff draft an ordinance to amend KIBC 3.55.025. This request falls under KIBC 2.30.050(C)(4), which states that agenda items prepared by staff at the request of the Mayor or by two or more Assembly Members under KIBC 2.20.070(C) or 2.30.100(G) must be scheduled on an agenda within 60 days of the request being submitted to the Clerk, unless the Assembly directs that the item appear on a specific meeting agenda. Accordingly, this code amendment request —unless directed differently by the Assembly or withdrawn by Assembly Members Whiteside and Johnson —must be placed on an Assembly agenda for ordinance introduction no later than January 5, 2026. ALTERNATIVES: FISCAL IMPACT: OTHER INFORMATION: KIBC 2.30.050 (C.3) Agenda items submitted by an assembly member or the mayor without staff assistance, or submitted by the manager, shall be included on the agenda within 60 days. KIBC 2.30.060 (B)Preparation of agenda items. ordinances, resolutions, or other proposed agenda items may be submitted to the clerk by an assembly member, a committee of the assembly, the mayor, or the manager for placement on the agenda. An assembly member may request an item placed on the assembly agenda by completing an agenda request form provided by the borough clerk's office and providing a copy of the proposed item in a format that is ready to be placed on the agenda. KIBC 2.20.070(C.1) Requests for Staff Assistance. During a work session or a meeting, or by submitting a request for services on a form provided by the borough clerk's office, the mayor may request that the manager, clerk, or attorney prepare a proposed ordinance or resolution to be submitted to the clerk for placement on the agenda in accordance with section Kodiak Island Borough Page 127 of 149 Discuss Code Change Amending KIBC 3.55.025 To Allocate Part Of The Sales... AGENDA ITEM #2. d. KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH STAFF REPORT DECEMBER 16, 2025 ASSEMBLY WORK SESSION 2.30.060(C)(4). KIBC 2.30.100(G.1) Requests for Staff Assistance. During a work session or a meeting, or by submitting a request for services on a form provided by the borough clerk's office, any two or more members of the assembly may request that the manager, clerk, or attorney prepare a proposed ordinance or resolution to be submitted to the clerk for placement on the agenda in accordance with section 2.30.060(C)(4). KIBC 2.30.050 (C.4)Agenda items prepared by staff at the request of the mayor or by two or more assembly members under section 2.20.070(C) or 2.30.100(G) shall be scheduled on an agenda within 60 days of the agenda item request being submitted to the clerk, unless the assembly directs that the item appear on a particular meeting agenda. Kodiak Island Borough Discuss Code Change Amending KIBC 3.55.025 To Allocate Part Of The Sales... Page 128 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #2. d. avZ ay KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH ATTACH THE ORDINANCE, RESOLUTION, OR AGENDA ITEM INFORMATION FOR ITEMS THAT ARE READY TO BE PLACED ON THE AGENDA DATE SUBMITTED: Il�d�as' Requestor: 4 Preferred Mtg. Date: ff<4 Item Description: �/W REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE STAFF TO PREPARE AN ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION Requestor 1: Requestor 2:—bzL' Detailed Description: I Si ill WlJ U/uJ'7ll�s dirt/llG1r�G ifx, G/✓l�y2, LEGAL OPINION REQUEST Requestor 1: Requestor 2: Date when you want the opinion by: Detailed Description: See pertinent code sections on the back. Revised on: 20240607 nj Page 129 of 149 Discuss Code Change Amending KIBC 3.55.025 To Allocate Part Of The Sales... AGENDA ITEM #2.d. KIBC 2.30.050 (C.3) Agenda items submitted by an assembly member or the mayor without staff assistance, or submitted by the manager, shall be included on the agenda within 60 days. KIBC 2.30.060 (B) Preparation of agenda items. ordinances, resolutions, or other proposed agenda items may be submitted to the clerk by an assembly member, a committee of the assembly, the mayor, or the manager for placement on the agenda. An assembly member may request an item placed on the assembly agenda by completing an agenda request form provided by the borough clerk's office and providing a copy of the proposed item in a format that is ready to be placed on the agenda. KIBC 2.20.070(C.1) Requests for Staff Assistance. During a work session or a meeting, or by submitting a request for services on a form provided by the borough clerk's office, the mayor may request that the manager, clerk, or attorney prepare a proposed ordinance or resolution to be submitted to the clerk for placement on the agenda in accordance with section 2.30.060(C)(4). KIBC 2.30. 100(G. 1) Requests for Staff Assistance. During a work session or a meeting, or by submitting a request for services on a form provided by the borough clerk's office, any two or more members of the assembly may request that the manager, clerk, or attorney prepare a proposed ordinance or resolution to be submitted to the clerk for placement on the agenda in accordance with section 2.30.060(C) (4). KIBC 2.30.050 (C.4) Agenda items prepared by staff at the request of the mayor or by two or more assembly members under section 2.20.070(C) or 2.30.100(G) shall be scheduled on an agenda within 60 days of the agenda item request being submitted to the clerk, unless the assembly directs that the item appear on a particular meeting agenda. KIBC 2.20.070(C.2) Requests for Legal Opinions. During a work session or a meeting, or by submitting a request for services on a form provided by the borough clerk's office, the mayor and an assembly member may request written legal opinions, relating to borough business, from the attorney through the manager's or the clerk's office. Upon receipt of the legal opinion, the clerk's office shall distribute it to all assembly members. KIBC 2.30.100(G.2) Requests for Legal Opinions. During a work session or a meeting, or by submitting a request for services on a form provided by the borough clerk's office, any two or more members of the assembly, may request written legal opinions, relating to borough business, from the attorney through the manager's or the clerk's office. Upon receipt of the legal opinion, the clerk's office shall distribute it to all assembly members. For staff use: % Received date: �0� Provided a copy to the Manager on: 60 days deadline: Scheduled on the meeting agenda of: Notes: KIBC 2.30.060 (B) Upon receipt of an agenda item request, the borough clerk shall immediately provide a copy to the borough manager. The borough manager may provide information or make recommendations, if applicable, and submit such information to the borough clerk for inclusion with the agenda item Revised on: 20240607 nj Page 130 of 149 Discuss Code Change Amending KIBC 3.55.025 To Allocate Part Of The Sales... AGENDA ITEM #2.d. KIBC 3.55.025, Allocation of sales tax proceeds 3.55.025 Allocation of sales tax proceeds. Page 1 of 1 A. The sales taxes collected under KIBC 3.55.010 shall be allocated to a separate fund to be appropriated and utilized solely for increased development of the tourist industry, and may be allocated for tourism programs, tourism enhancement projects, such as beautification within the borough, and the administrative costs associated with such programs; B. The sales tax collected in any village or city in the Kodiak Island Borough may be appropriated for the purpose of the development of the tourist industry in that village or city. [Ord. FY2012-11 §2, 2011; Ord. 96-19 §3, 1996. Formerly §3.30.025]. The Kodiak Island Borough Code is current through Ordinance FY2026-10, passed October 2, 2025. Disclaimer: The borough clerk's office has the official version of the Kodiak Island Borough Code. Users should contact the borough clerk's office for ordinances passed subsequent to the ordinance cited above. Borough Website: www.kodiakak.us Borough Telephone: (907) 486-9300 Hosted by General Code. The Kodiak Island Borough Code is current through Ordinance FY2026-10, passed October 2, 2025. Page 131 of 149 Discuss Code Change Amending KIBC 3.55.025 To Allocate Part Of The Sales... AGENDA ITEM #2.e. KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH STAFF REPORT DECEMBER 16, 2025 ASSEMBLY WORK SESSION SUBJECT: Discuss Election Code Change Whether To Allow Removal Of Attestation On By -Mail Voted Ballots ORIGINATOR: Nova M. Javier, MMC, Borough Clerk RECOMMENDATION: The Clerk's Office does not provide a recommendation on this matter; however, it requests that the Assembly engage in a discussion to determine if there is an interest to amend KIBC 7.50.050(C), DISCUSSION: According to KIBC 7.30.025, the Clerk's Office conducts voting by mail in precincts where fewer than 75 voters participated in the last regular election. The Assembly has designated the following precincts as by -mail precincts, as outlined in Resolution No. FY2023-07: Chiniak, Ouzinkie, Port Lions, Old Harbor, and KI- South comprising of Larsen Bay, Akhiok, and Karluk. In the previous election, 706 ballots were mailed to voters in these precincts. Of the 104 ballots returned, 4 were rejected due to the absence of a witness signature. As the Clerk's Office prepares to order by -mail voting envelopes for next year's election, staff seeks Assembly direction on whether to retain or remove the current attestation (witness signature) requirement. For reference, both Anchorage and Juneau conduct their elections entirely by mail and do not require an attestation on the return envelope. KIBC 7.50.050(C) ... sign the voter's certificate on the back of the return envelope in the presence of an official who shall sign as attesting official(s) and shall date their signature. Officials recognized to attest the legitimacy of signatures listed in this subsection are: a notary public, a commissioned officer of the Armed Forces including the National Guard, state court judge, magistrate, United States postal official, or other person qualified to administer oaths. If none of the officials listed in this subsection are reasonably accessible, an absentee voter shall have the ballot witnessed by a person over the age of 18 years. ALTERNATIVES: FISCAL IMPACT: OTHER INFORMATION: KIBC 7.30.025, Voting by -mail precincts. Kodiak Island Borough Page 132 of 149 Discuss Election Code Change Whether To Allow Removal Of Attestation On ... AGENDA ITEM #2.e. I 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 Introduced by: Mayor and Assembly Drafted by: Borough Clerk Introduced on: 07/07/2022 Adopted on: 07/07/2022 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH RESOLUTION NO. FY2023-07 A RESOLUTION OF THE ASSEMBLY OF THE KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH DESIGNATING PRECINCTS, WHERE THE VOTER TURNOUT WAS LESS THAN 75 VOTERS AT THE LAST REGULAR ELECTION, AS BALLOT BY MAIL PRECINCTS WHEREAS, KIBC 7.30.025 Voting by -mail precincts states that precincts where the voter turnout was less than 75 voters at the last regular election may be designated as absentee by mail precincts by resolution of the assembly. In those precincts no precinct election board shall be appointed; and WHEREAS, KIBC 7.30.025(E) dictates that, as long as there are voting officials who are willing and able to conduct absentee voting -in person, the Borough Clerk may provide absentee in the locations where voting by -mail will occur; and WHEREAS, absentee voting will be made available 15 days before an election, up to and may include the day of the election, during the hours designated for absentee voting, by completing an absentee in -person envelope. Personal representative voting will also be made available in these locations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE ASSEMBLY OF THE KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH that subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. FY2023-05 and based on the last voter turnout from the last regular Election, the following precincts are designated as by -mail precincts: 32/800 Cape Chiniak Precinct 32/835 Old Harbor Precinct 32/840 Ouzinkie Precinct 32/845 Port Lions Precinct 32/815 Kodiak Island South - Larsen Bay Includes Akhiok and Karluk) ADOPTED BY THE ASSEMBLY OF THE KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH THIS SEVENTH DAY OF JULY, 2022 KODIAK 17 BO ATTEST: William Roberts, ayor kyTO q(W-A-A, Nova M. Javier, Borou h Clerk VOTES: Ayes: Arndt, Smiley, Turner, Williams Noes: Delgado, Griffin, Smith Kodiak Island Borough, Alaska Resolution No. FY2023-07 Page 1 of 1 Page 133 of 149 Discuss Election Code Change Whether To Allow Removal Of Attestation On ... AGENDA ITEM #2.e. CHECKLIST — Have you done the following? ' ULM ..... • Filled -in the oval to the left of your choice. For write-ins, fill in the oval to the left and write the name of Y D YES _ n$ U the write-in candidate. s o f k a t • Provided at least one identifier. m ❑ YES _;E • Signed the affidavit. N ❑ YES GRAY SKRiEcySLEEVE • Had your signature witnessed. E ❑ YES • Folded your ballot in half and placed it inside the o ❑ YES gray secrecy sleeve. • Placed the gray secrecy sleeve in this envelope. Q ❑ YES RETURNEN148iM INSTRUCTIONS FOR RETURNING THIS ENVELOPE °T"°" r,•...t'-r °r9 mow....- •, ,�- - - -OI-SD_ • Fold the flap over the back of this envelope.- • Peel and seal the envelope_- n. • This envelope MUST BE POSTMARKED BEFORE MIDNIGHT ON ELECTION DAY! ;^ ;-�-E- _ -_ For replacement ballots or any voting questions, please call (907) 486-9310. — _ — — _j VOTE BY MAIL IS AS EASY AS 1- 2 - 3! STEP 1. You must provide at least one of the following identifiers: OR OR Voter # Last 4 Social Security # Date of Birth I declare that I am a citizen of the United States and a qualified voter in the Kodiak Island Borough; that I am entitled to vote the enclosed ballot(s); and that, unless prevented by physical disability, I have personally marked the enclosed ballot and have not unnecessarily exhibited the marked ballot to any other person. I have not requested a ballot from any other borough and am not voting in any other manner in this election. If I had this certification attested to by a witness other than an authorized official, it was because no official empowered to administer an oath was reasonably available. I certify that the foregoing is true and accurate. STEP 2. Voter's Signature: x STEP 3. Your Signature Must Be Witnessed: WITNESSING —OPTION I WITNESSING - OPTION II (By an official authorized to administer an oath) (Witnessed by a person over the age of 18) Subscribed and sworn to me: This day of , 20 at Witness Signature: Official's Signature: City, State: Official's Title: Date: I 318607 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH CLERK 5-3/4X9 Canvass Board Use Only Count code: Full Count Partial Count No Count: Reason: Page 134 of 149 Discuss Election Code Change Whether To Allow Removal Of Attestation On ... AGENDA ITEM #2.e. 'N0I1VW210=1NI IVNOS113d un0A 13310211d Ol WO11O9 UNd d01 lid IV3S 013VINI NOI1110d SIH1 d33M 3SV31d NO POSTAGE NECESSARY IF MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES OFFICIAL BALLOT ENCLOSED BUSINESS REPLY MAIL FIRST-CLASS MAIL PERMIT NO. 2 KODIAK AK POSTAGE WILL BE PAID BY ADDRESSEE KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH OFFICE OF THE BOROUGH CLERK 710 MILL BAY RD KODIAK AK 99615-9969 318607 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH CLERK 5-3/4X9 Page 135 of 149 Discuss Election Code Change Whether To Allow Removal Of Attestation On ... AGENDA ITEM #2. e. Wd 00:9VZ6 hZOZ/b/ZL LU i. ppu!'9 baalsOd - ZOONbZ L 6 HON VZO 9Lb90£ Voter Declaration I state and declare as true that my name and signature or mark are shown on this envelope and that I am voting the ballot provided to me by the Municipality of Anchorage and not casting any other ballot in this election; that I am a citizen of the U.S., State of Alaska, and have been a resident of the Municipality of Anchorage for 30 days before the election; that I am or will be at least 18 years of age on the date of the election; and that I am not disqualified from voting due to a felony conviction or court order. Making false statements on this envelope is punishable as a misdemeanor. (AMC 8.30.170 — Unsworn falsification) WARNING: 1 understand that it is illegal to falsely sign, forge a signature, vote more than once in this election, or cast another person's ballot. If you have any questions about signing the voter declaration or witness oath, please contact the Voter Hotline at 907-243-VOTE(8683) or email elections@anchorageak.gov. Voter, Sign below (required) PowerofAttorney notacceptable X voter erriall or phone number (optional, in case there is on issue with your signature) Only if you are unable to write your signature, make a mark in the voter signature area above and have your mark witnessed and signed below. witness Printed LegalName Witness bignature ' Return your ballot Witness Declaration . as early as possible! By signing above, I affirm that I am at least 18 years of age on the date of the election; or I am a notary public or other person authorized to administer oaths. Your ballot must be postmarked by I further affirm that the person named on the envelope and marking the envelope Election Day or returned to a Secure is known to me, was unable to sign, and has signed a mark. I understand that it Drop Box by 8 p.m. Election Day. is illegal to falsely sign, forge a signature, or cast another person's ballot. Falsely signing this declaration is an election offense and will be prosecuted. ANCH1124RO02 - PostReq E 3N3H 39V1SOd XIddv O �In��llrlrlil��rll�lllil�l��ilil��ll�ln�i���l�ui�l��l�ilnl 6S99-6TS66 NV a2ea0y:)uV 6S996T x08 Od a2e.ioy:)uV jo Aj!ledl:)lunllll suolpal3 bOW "'s3lon" T0&j0q0UV 03S013N3 IOIIV13 IVIOIJJ0 AVOTES MOA Elections, Municipality of Anchorage • Return this signed envelope • Drop Box and Anchorage Vote Center locations can be found with your voted ballot to a at muni.org/elections/dropbox. Secure Drop Box, by mail, or . Track Your Ballot: Sign up for text, email, or voicemail alerts to an Anchorage Vote Center. about the status of your ballot at anchoragevotes.com. I N is o � ~ J �[J Lo W N Q� Um '4 d LO Y N V � R m u7 0 � R m J N LO Q •- N� 9 Li- .. r- [t] LO OR LC) � o X M rn o L 00 41 O V% cc y LA G7 LL N Q C-4 V, O N C O L OW2rn Page 136 of 149 Discuss Election Code Change Whether To Allow Removal Of Attestation On ... AGENDA ITEM #2.e. STOP! DID YOU REMEMBER TO SIGN THIS BALLOT ENVELOPE? SIMPLE STEPS TO RETURN YOUR BALLOT: I . Remove the top stub from your ballot by tearing at the perforation. 2. Vote your ballot. 3. Place your voted ballot in the secrecy sleeve and place the secrecy sleeve in this ballot return envelope. 4. Sign the voter declaration on this return envelope. 5. Return this envelope with first class postage to the US Post Office, or save postage and place it in a Secure Drop Box rr or return it to an Anchorage Vote Center. ✓il ✓%ni / 1% �"-r/%��ri 1%I '1\ I/� Y l/,�fil/\=a c Ube 0 A N 1\0AI �1(7 J/y / 1% I'��i/'ll//IVY -� i)\�71i (✓ 1�f�/\l�� �%/\,//111 N\K� � ��Ir/�J%I�' J`l1Q\Ij r/�\N'r� it 'o/F11 �� ��.,'NO�a�\�\\I\I\� �-3�\mil l(� EK\/���/\AIL' ��,1/IIII���L%'llriirlr �J, 4*z 41'Il//'\\'���/le �/ It /cA4h -P 4 110�_r� +e �11�_�-\ /�11 I �I-/ ��= ,- I✓rlh% -1�- n ►(\\-III\`�i� c� ^\/`� z _ 1f� n\�=1(��=11�11/s\ \\'��/In/=7/,//\\�L-\ ,. /I /,Ok4 x �I%,9 OII�\ / \/i �,I \ , At , \ � � l y,/ \/[ ll%II ljl�II\\/� /`I�/,�,I/�II�`%\���•trl v y\\�j//��`/�11�Q/, =Q9/1;��/lvilyyisll`�//^i;��ll i_II%/>1! rl%1\�II/��//II_�lj/✓�I/IL'j��=\ \� / ��/� i\\ram Jr, d!- ��. �\A .�lli = r 1 q \ \%� -% }+ /;\ I1\\II\���ly\`1\ \� 111i\/\ 1\ / � I`L ny\�l_ _ v1 l�{I G)��\� M��Q pr'w�'/11 \ �✓ \�\� �\\III'/ �dY�� �pl`\\�� iI1\\ •/{�r�Vl(lllll //�1\� 1 \\/_�ll�///v �Vfr` �4 S`ii\` ir 'I( \\+��I/1=1(�\,/�'�`ti\\�l�%//�\\ % \�\�� ���/��`\\\�i���\li�\�/c//ti/%1i�i\I'/\�Ih%11�`a\i`,�P/�I�I'ja\\�rl�l\Q.ii�ulF��ll/�l�\,\i/�1\-l�'�1\�\/��%����-1r�,�1�/��%���1 1 C\�1/ ram\ II N \ \ \\t /\/IliS�rr';//, C//\� � / //� _ � /� i\\11� /1/�/1\/ A _f _ / , , /-1 q \\- L?.' i- 11v/11. �p�,, 1�:�-� �. '�� 1\/�/i =, I , Y \\f�/ /' p /\1/-`>\1j\ \\�\\c \\ill Ili f�jr�rl!,��1\lll���\ll\\iQ'1�1� // \\//`�Pir��ll�9i1!�\\I►�n ��IIS?`�` \\jl �\�\y�\\II\�1/=II �a �\y(\�/'\\�/I ��/�//''I,ll ! rl 'll\\� yll�/% %/11�� i1�=1,/if/n ��\\'�I V��\�\ 11:\\,I//s �iJ ���\ i1/,1�`I�/I� \� I' �\\r.11� II/��1l ��_n� �// `IfG jll\II\IP\/�/ yl� li` �� ,N_11-\�\1� II\\\�/(�lill� I��� yil\�//�J%/� /%//I wlLi_i'L:(_ \\�l�ll� \\\'�li/ /I\ /I� \� I II - _=\ Ali �- = 0.1 -/ a, .\ y✓i dl�=il�' II - J - I�al �� ha\\�� \ �l �r\l�% i � �//11� �\ �=11 \-�i1Pyl� �s� \Uia\\�11Jq�1114 T//� -�� /� ♦ - / ��_�gal\F4\`a///�\�I�11 \a\//?ll� it Ilil �Jlv�/ % �/ilt!ol�`��a+1/�r� �I` �� 1�\�/;\11��\\ \'� t.11� /ice, _v��t\` \�- �.lj�►l�y�\n,�i J�Y11\ I(r-/\_\ ./i mil- 9 //�/ii�, //�yj� �I j /�1t \Z/�/�I�\`,II�/� /j\Jr\��!'',1JI �I Il/G\il'ni.Ji a�`\s11'I�\�/\/�//i�\i \�/SC'�.\�I?`11&1��,i `n o�.,/ ­,'.,\��I�,llrj al /�/�//�_//{�/G�/t.�/�l1` 11\Y �r� ! I�p\�Qf/%II,\7`�a�o .�4-�q��r'U�l��i�\\Il�y //�=/��G\./l-/�`\I\\ \ / lb��\/ \�\ �\11\i� II/i \�JI' lljr� / //i II. o .e �1, i %\-\\\ //II\\\ \ �I►1�w1111!/��J(���Il�li�lj�\�/�Jl�\o'e\;\`�\1//lll(���✓Ill�/� 1\'`1L�\l�yl�\\III I \ / ./\tr/11=//�/i.• �/j//f/I I i��YL�\(11r`��ll,Il/�\�-��\:-11 a1-111/ilrloJli\-"'r',a^\�o\;'0_9\�=,C\\7; 11,\l/,11=/j\/i.•///�/,-If�YL� 1�/��� �II� /� 11=�i-.i P\ 1 I 1 IK�?\\ �c;�l �II� ,�'/,11. _ Q��'�o_► rC �_ .-�I=� =,L\\\ �/i�l��\�lii��/11� \\��//'�1�/�IM�%� 9\V)0 \`/I/JI'�►G\�r'�lti�� II_�I���If`�'`\;\��� /a\i�, Y �� .� \\il9( h/r ,�.71�.i,11��_II/\\ II"��if�r\df\\/11\I\ t \ r �\\ \ c �kc- h .\ ! I \ \ ✓ r \ �_ Ih\i� �11/W # = r ea \'v "al =1►�r \C�= (� .� ✓ . l�'\\l r-I _ \�r�j��\"\\C- q\\�/II 1��IIc�\� �1►� I ��7ir b 1. _ OII,/��lri/,= /�\\l\1jV1�/! /\\O r �r , _ / II; /\ //11�-- ,oL\\h_1�"��/, �- , % /i/i //\/c��u/= \\i u�\//\l�/III/ \; / /\\,I 1i=1_�'1/\� \�I i Imo' /rn�\�\/ r 1/� IlZ!r If _ / / \ / /i-' . li= \r , I� r /�\\\\!�' �. \ IrO l�// ,�\—II w\\; ,II AlSI.� �`\'v/ll�rt� r,/\ \\��_,.,�o� �Ir ll: �i\�'I ,'\T—�.1�� �\ Il�w\\ar� T t 11 / u , 6r I- 4✓r /_ eve . '1 \ �- -\ \\ eli f<.= \�\ tl �\ \ / -it✓\`Q\\ ��Y ,/\\��-1F� / Il, // \ i G\\ �i / 1 a�� �� ,\\- ..I\�/ //i__\\. i1✓\ //Q\\ �g ,l\\T _1!a /� j• IIIj\tIIII%\I\/\\1111/�!/Ir\\\/�/\\c�1�/I\�� pl�� _ II� LU�J rrillirj'\�y II \ /11� �\/+ll/I�r,IL+\/�\/ /\ �/ �I /\ Ic/ I/ 1= ��, 1n�/�\II II ��q�jll�•\\��\\ _I�//�G\\� 1N/�II\i\\\lam\III\�! = yl�' ��� �►L� ;4 I- \"�ll�l� 1=0If // \\ j�I���I �l\\�. /j\ll \i1( / �i-.IlWilli,\\� //- / �\ilj/•� dl�li'A l/ �(�i (l\\\\� ✓,\�'��I,IIY441i 1/ �� \\II :r\��\� f�II� 11= � -\\::7-1� `, il�\ I(� ~ 11 �l\z,.�iotl✓=\Y1\�,/i�►��1,11>��411 fi �� \�li� vr�_,\,\� II ��;,jv!IaG l�`���le`_\\���l��l�/,�\/���2�1 �\ol��p����r/L/i�l III��`�I/ill_�\� tie�d\\l�l+�\\✓ h�//`1\�HN1�1\\41jC11Nt�\=��/<<'-//.��\/ f`/zr\'II /../.16;.X, \ i%/ //�. .` Via✓/?\ ,Itj I� III =H�11 \\\\ ( \:e II %\I7I/1/�q;l��\� ' = \/ice\�// I�//� �h d,�\\�\\^/,.: r\_\ ��IL 1 �ll�-� I\�i\\� I \\•in �:I \ill,`. Ua `\ �\\ \\// �� —//\tom II \\\\ .Cc11J1�-nil/�//1r--"y,��� '// �r�t� �/ N'`i1a\' t�11\\,,;✓ ai �1 ll— a- ,< r/l// �h r i-II - / ;i�II� C\\'/ f=�ti\i7.�/4Y1 �•• l�`l/i l /,+//\\�tll�//\�,/�III� �!�/j1�1\� Ill \�r� Jj7% bell�s %` �t',�\ •, 1\/i•�f�\\%, Qv ��/i�l/\\��� \4 1\ '� itr'� 1 u�� �/ \�J�/ Nil / � / �>7 ���; , !�• M �'�^ /d_�� )� �� /� / al• �l/�- ��j\\i1�\ \\ � \��\j \\//\ri % ll�' '// ` `i — \ �� � �a 4 �9�/= , \\`��a/�-- G _ZJl� �o\, .ei u \ G,,l.; II r JI _ II .., \\1t = 11= // I►,�1= , ll�ljd(%II ;II �\\�// /i I\` i� �J� - '� ``� o / F %_ �l ll� MCA/ 1tW11+ �\i a -uJ /�ir441% 1\�IJ /Y\ ,'\\/inp'.�0_9 ��-��\\l�'fl+\l//11=//.�_/f / YL \ill %/ 11=/i- // %\\Yq\� / \\�/%lull' 11= /� /;�1 i /rl \� r�l//� /i ��g1�\Ai6, 'ca- o\1`Ar �(\a�\\\//hrsl \yam P -, %- 1 \// o r > �r'' '�ihi�. rll S�—/,�II_�ll.\,/1M�� �\\\l11f \\�/1� \V-I / ✓ ,//1\ / �:If`�r��\\.\,r \, �KcY' ,V \� �S`,\\r II �/'_II I/ �l/-1 ! \\/� �- \\ / \\ i �1 r��11 \11 II\ r l r-Ih_1= \ 1\�/A o s_=�I� IrG \ / / _ ,\ _ 1 ct �/II, IL \ i� \ fro,//Jl.//` _TII �\i1��=/ //\\�/ It \�,` \L� p"c��� r� G• �\�Di 4 ..�Q�/ //i\�_ \\.� :il✓\//C \\\` A\�i./III: /� /��Y T�_lLU��I�� \ \\ . 11. U_ _ Ll _e r /_ 1 % -ll\\\ \�/ 1 / .� \7i -�`�' , �I _ \ ll�_ I — 1� / III— j 1 '�yl\ \\/\�\1111�\\//\\�1�IIY�4�1/ ���_II�`\lii�5i�i`/..%/ ��`\�',I� a�►I� / _ l / / O �• / i \� - III �l <<i\ \`II�� \\��� - c�,/// -� i5 III\\/�li\`_ q\\ , Ai aas rs J(I /1!� �\� / ./� �r�l G11\\��/ % / •� �� /i \\% .�tin_IF l�\�_ •�drl� \h,\�� l�r �OII� �\C�IN 11 ll�/,/i�j�/\\%�I\\G\I�i�JIJ/i\II_JIN//1�I���/� /� \\\ , .Ir-. ►- I� IL I� /fit � � I >�: f � I �- �\ (, 31`//j ��\\�)�,��t.�i\'`�_\li%//lrlf ��f%(i\\�/1 14\iIJ� III//�li�� jl�\\ 1\v�/ill/� % \ u�\ �'t \� �:1�� �ar� I�/iJI,, \11✓N C i0/,\ �,/ I -_ � � \�. \`dl=' � r �� `�i 1 hl fi \- , \tom ll \\ �11\��\�_` //11\��1.1\\4 14d1/\\ \�\Ii�/ �\\Il�ih=11=� �1 I � � � /_ri, `�i� o . 1//\ \� �� /( 1/ \/ IIN \\ \- �L �\a h\ / / `�\�. bEl, I r, ,,_vow r a/r/T / . �,\\/\`t�//ilJl�j /,c- '\\%L \� \\1\'~�rj ��r\ / /� 1 <�lL\�//��� -G /��/ll��\1 \V=11�% \II\\�1J�,1��\\� =1�•3�= ll U/U,� \� i4, „' c \,L��I . , my' \C� /� �\ �/- —\\. �i \ II\\il-�\J�% / / /� //_ \ /^- IN//\\ll\\/..\\�ll�r"/fir_\C� \ `� \�� /� /�/,�/\\II\` _ �Jl,/\ �/` \II\ ,G \•' \. \\. -bi R.• /9i I^ /,`�1 \ j'IIH�II\\\G�/\/,�\\L\�II(��Ill�filA.j'// /^\\'/i ce//�1 �\� /d`��o�,/i% \\/\X V7=- 4L/�jl✓'n,%);\���':rlr\\%[,;\i�l1'iIL4�iJlilli/=y'�`/l ` 1`�i,/�`�, �o;�',�\%\ /..\ 1\�// .1t-v' 1 // .. IVY/ � �G� �• � rl � J \a\�`I r��_/,.�/i.�C1/nil=ll.-h-.�\`cJl\-1_11�� .\ill...=�T�,� i�;� �..�i\�/lar� \i,,,.?.�'�•tIL�,�.,t.��iNi .a `If ,��_/..�/i.C1/Ni1=11�� _ 305475_02_ANCH1124RO02 - PostReq E.indd 2 12/4/2024 12:15:02 PM Page 137 of 149 Discuss Election Code Change Whether To Allow Removal Of Attestation On ... AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Wd L1,:9b:£ 9ZOZ/9/9 L PPuf3 KdOO - L0M9Z903NnP ZO OLZ90£ VOTER CERTIFICATE I state, under penalty of perjury, that my name, signature or mark, and personal identifier are shown on this envelope and that I am voting the ballot provided to me by the City and Borough of Juneau. I further declare that I am or will be 18 years of age on the date of this election and that I am a qualified voter in the State of Alaska and a resident of the City and Borough of Juneau for at least thirty days immediately preceding the election and that I have been registered to vote in state elections at a residence address within the City and Borough of Juneau at least thirty days before this election, and that I am not disqualified to vote under Article V of the Alaska Constitution. I further certify that I am not voting in any other manner in this election and certify that the foregoing is true and accurate. I understand that it is illegal to falsely sign, forge a signature, or cast another person's ballot. Falsely signing this declaration is an election office offense and subject to prosecution underAS 15.56. REQUIRED OPTIONAL Your phone number: Power of Attorney? -- By law, this envelope Signature the signature of the person it was sent to. If you Personal Identifier: sign, you must make a mark or "X" in front of a i witness must sign below. By law your ballot cannot be counted unless you include: Signature of voter to whom this ballot was sent (required) Signature must match the signature on file with the elections office. Personal Identifier (one required): • Voter ID Number • AK Driver's License or ID Number • Date of Birth • Last 4 digits of Social Security Number Eta Online: www.juneau.org/clerk/elections Email: CBJ.Elections@juneau.gov PI Phone: 907-586-5278 option 4 MA I.? our website JUNE0625RO01 - QBRM E -------------------------------------------------------- 0 � �Irrlll�llllrll�r�l�r�lllllllr�rrl�lrl��r�ll�rllll����l�ll��rll 6LS£-£0866 >iv nV3Nnr 6LS££ X08 Od SN0113313 nV3Nnf 30 HJn02108 18 Ally SZOZ `L aagolop Aq peuanja�j ao paVewlsod 98 IsnW o 4L 4L '?INa$ lam. yl Aq p° N (141114 nVDNnrl 1011VS IIVIN AS 310A lVDI330 3a3F1 39VISOd 6LS£-£0866 NV Ineaunr -1IVW SWID-ISNU 6LSfi£ X08 'O'd AlddV suoil3a13 neaunr to y8noaog 2 Al!:) — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — --------------------------------- - ��uie��.�i•r.�am:u�an><�i:a:r_���•� r ♦ BALLOT DROP BOXES pp Available from September 20, 2025, to Election Day r Q October 7, 2025 at 8p.m. Locations listed on the ' enclosed sheet and our website. W ' > THROUGH THE MAIL 0 ' Ballots must be postmarked by October 7, 2025 to UJ count. oC VOTE CENTER ~O Vote in person on or before Election Day, z October 7, 2025. Locations and open hours are C) listed on the enclosed sheet and our website. 0 0 N 2 V � H � � J Lu 00 Cq W W N O i1 eo W _N •• J LL m LL p a) in ace L0 X m L)i pop `6m LL � r- OfIO�M v [I -an J co 2 Cl) L� N oOF- LU _ LL ..CO P- oo m W u) m to X M N O Lu Cn X J � � X m N CV LO in m 4 ci Q O.N C iN Q N N m N c o m t G W 2 a U) Page 138 of 149 Discuss Election Code Change Whether To Allow Removal Of Attestation On ... AGENDA ITEM #2.e. Page 139 of 149 Discuss Election Code Change Whether To Allow Removal Of Attestation On AGENDA ITEM #8.a. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 Introduced by: Borough Manager's Office thru the Mayor Drafted by: Special Projects Support Introduced on: Adopted on: KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH RESOLUTION NO. XXXXX A RESOLUTION OF THE ASSEMBLY OF THE KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH IDENTIFYING FEDERAL PROJECT AND PROGRAM PRIORITIES FOR FEDERAL FISCAL YEARS 2026 & 2027 WHEREAS, the Alaska Congressional Delegation has requested the views of the Kodiak Island Borough on which Federal projects and programs should be considered priorities, in no particular order, for rural Alaskan communities and their residents. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE ASSEMBLY OF THE KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH that: The Kodiak Island Borough's views and recommendations on priority Federal programs and projects for FY 2026 and FY 2027 are as follows. These recommendations are submitted understanding that Congress has not yet enacted a number of important FY 2026 appropriations bills that include Borough priorities and therefore are reiterated below. 1. Community Project/Congressionally Directed Spending Requests: The Borough submits the following FY 2026 & FY 2027 Community Project Funding (CPF)/Congressionally Directed Spending (CDS) requests, consistent with guidance issued by the House and Senate Appropriations Committees. • St Hermans Harbor Infrastructure Replacement: St. Hermans Harbor has been a vital harbor facility for Kodiak's large and diverse commercial fishing fleet for 40 years. The facility provides safe moorage for over 400 vessels from all over Alaska and the West Coast. Unfortunately, its float system is aged, decrepit and starting to fail. The City applied for MARAD Port Infrastructure Development Program (PIDP) grant funding for Phase One of the float system replacement project and was awarded funding in 2024 in the amount of $11.2 million. Pending in FY 2026 House appropriations is $5 million in CPF for the project. We thank Rep. Begich for securing these funds and urge their inclusion in the final FY 2026 appropriations bill. These CPF funds combined with the PIDP grant will enable significant progress in the rebuild and upgrade of St. Hermans Harbor. • Russian River Erosion Control Project: Over a number of years, the Russian River has experienced significant erosion due to flooding, shifts in and bifurcation of river channels, and increased sedimentation. This erosion in Kodiak Island Borough, Alaska Resolution FY20026 &2027 Page 14 PoggAof 5 AGENDA ITEM #8.a. 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 areas has reached the point where it is damaging and will further damage public and private property in the Bells Flats neighborhood in the Borough. This threat extends to homes, public and private land that borders the Russian River, and a public road which is the only road access into and out of the neighborhood. The Borough needs the Corps' expertise to develop both short and long-term solutions to mitigate this threat to this important and vital community on Kodiak Island. The Corps has informed us that this early study work would cost $200,000 through its Flood Plain Management Services Program. The Borough would like to resubmit a request for funding for this project in FY 2027 as well as submit a project authorization expedited study request for the Water Resources Development Act which Congress is due to consider in 2026. 2. Broadband Service To Rural Areas: Establishing or improving broadband service to the Borough's rural communities has been a high Federal priority for us for many years. We support continued deployment of high-speed broadband to rural areas through NTIA's Tribal Broadband Program; USDA's Telecommunications Infrastructure Loan Program & Community Connect Grant Program; and the State Broadband Grants Program created by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. 3. Groundfish Surveys: Our Federal resolutions over the years have consistently called for maintenance of effort of Federal groundfish trawl surveys in Alaska. This maintenance of effort is needed as part of the Federal science- and data -driven fishery management process to establish sustainable groundfish quotas. It has been supported by the Alaska Congressional Delegation for which we are appreciative. This baseline is for six surveys, one of which is dedicated to movement of fish out of historical survey areas. That funding/directive is included in the Senate's FY 2026 appropriations bill funding NOAA. We respectfully request that six Alaska groundfish trawl surveys be continued and funded in the final FY 2026 appropriations bill, and for the FY 2027 funding cycle as well. 5. Russian Seafood Import Ban: The dumping of seafood products by Russia into the U.S. and international markets has driven down the price of Alaska seafood and hurt Alaska harvesters, processors and fisheries -dependent communities like Kodiak. In March of 2023, the Biden Administration issued an Executive Order to ban direct Russian seafood imports into the U.S. as part of its sanctions for the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Unfortunately, Russia succeeded in bypassing the sanctions by routing its seafood through reprocessing in and export from China to the U.S. To tighten this loophole, in the Biden Administration issued another Executive Order to further ban Russian imports even if it is processed and sold from another country. We thank the Delegation for pressing the Biden Administration to take action and for persuading the Trump Administration to keep the two Executive Orders in place. Rerouting of Russian seafood through or for sale in other countries, including Europe, remains a concern. We urge the Delegation to remain vigilant and encourage State Department and U.S. Trade Representative engagement with these countries. Kodiak Island Borough, Alaska Resolution FY20026 & 2027 Page 1 P1agg4;of 5 AGENDA ITEM #8.a. 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 6. Fisheries Disaster Relief: Congress provided $300 million in fisheries disaster relief funds earlier in this year but unfortunately the Department of Commerce has not approved any of the submitted fisheries disaster relief requests over the past year. This includes multiple disaster relief requests submitted by Governor Dunleavy for a number of Alaska's fisheries, including for Kodiak's 2024 pink salmon fishery disaster. Our pink salmon fishery that year experienced a 68 percent in value when compared to recent annual averages. We urge the Delegation to press the Department to expeditiously review and approve eligible requests so that fishermen and fishing business can be compensated for their losses, including to the Borough for any foregone raw fish tax losses. 7. North Pacific Observer Program: Observers are an important part of managing the halibut and groundfish fisheries in the Gulf of Alaska. Gulf of Alaska fishery participants pay into the North Pacific Observer Fund to cover the costs of "partial coverage" for Gulf fishing sectors but there has been a shortfall in funding to cover observer costs in recent years. The Senate Commerce, Justice, Science Appropriations Bill level funds the program for FY 2026. We request that an additional $2 million in funding be provided in FY 2027 above base funding along with carryover of language concerning the cost - burdens on the fixed -gear fleet. 8. U.S. Coast Guard Base -- Kodiak: The One Big Beautiful Bill Act includes major investment in Coast Guard activities and programs totaling over $24 billion. This is the largest infusion of funding for the Coast Guard ever. These are additional funds on top of regular appropriations which are about $13.5 billion/year. The next step in the process is for the Coast Guard to develop a detailed spending plan of how, when and where the funds will be allocated. We are already excited about prior Coast Guard decisions and funding to homeport two Offshore Patrol Cutters and two Fast Response Cutters along with supporting housing and shoreside infrastructure projects at USCG -Kodiak. The additional funding from the OBBBA provides the opportunity for potential homeporting of a future icebreaker in Kodiak. We urge the Delegation to support that possibility with the Coast Guard. The Borough is aware that the depth and hard rock bottom of Womens Bay could be impediments. If dredging to the proper depth there is not feasible, the Borough supports other locations for a possible icebreaker including an effort by the City to seek Army Corps of Engineers construction of a breakwater and future deep draft dock off Near Island. Lastly, the Senate version of the FY 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for the third straight year included a provision that would have included the Coast Guard in the Defense Community Infrastructure Program, thus making local infrastructure projects like renovating our elementary school eligible for DCIP funding, but unfortunately the provision was again dropped from the final bill due to opposition from the Armed Services Committees over use of DOD funding for projects from another Department. We thank Senator Sullivan for authoring and pressing for enactment of the provision and urge its resubmission for the FY 2027 cycle. 9. Payment -In -Lieu -of -Taxes (PILT): PILT is a very important revenue source to the Borough, given that there are over 2.8 million acres removed by the Federal Government Kodiak Island Borough, Alaska Resolution FY200p26 & 2027 Page 14(gg4;of 5 AGENDA ITEM #8.a. 136 from local taxation within our boundaries. This is land that would otherwise be available 137 to the private sector to develop, creating jobs for the residents of Kodiak and our rural 138 Kodiak Island communities. PILT funds supplement Borough resources to provide basic 139 social services, including medical facilities, emergency fire and rescue services, roads, 140 and schools to our island communities. In FY 2025, the Borough's PILT payment was 141 $1,924,386 — an all-time high. We thank the Delegation for its long-standing support for 142 PILT and urge continued support for full funding in FY 2026 and FY 2027. 143 144 10. National Wildlife Refuge Fund ("Refuge Revenue Sharing"): While not as significant 145 as PILT, the National Wildlife Refuge Fund is a critical source of replacement revenue to 146 communities like ours that have the presence of a large Federal wildlife refuge within their 147 boundaries. The Obama, Trump I & II and Biden Administrations have all sought to 148 terminate appropriations for the Fund but thankfully Congress has rejected these requests, 149 including level funding for the Fund in the pending FY 2026 appropriations bills. The 150 Kodiak Island Borough opposes the termination of appropriations for this important 151 program from which it received $180,258 this year. The Borough thanks the Delegation 152 for its on -going support, and seeks continued level funding in FY 2027. 153 154 11. Essential Air Service (EAS): The Borough's communities are highly reliant on the EAS 155 program, its support to air carriers and its requirements for island community service that 156 otherwise wouldn't exist or would be provided at much higher rates. The FY 2026 157 President's Budget Request requested no appropriations for EAS. Fortunately, both the 158 House and Senate Appropriations Committees rejected the request and include full 159 funding for EAS in their respective appropriations bills; in fact, the Senate includes a 12 160 percent increase. The Delegation has strongly supported EAS funding and opposed an 161 earlier proposal under consideration for the One Big Beautiful Bill that would have 162 terminated its funding derived from overflight fees. Overflight fees account for 163 approximately 40 percent of total EAS funding, with the remaining 60 percent coming from 164 regular appropriations. We thank the AK Congressional Delegation for sustained support 165 of EAS. The Borough wants to reiterate the need for that support for full funding in annual 166 appropriations for the program in FY 2026 and FY 2027. 167 168 12. U.S. Military Arctic Presence: The Borough appreciates the Delegation's prolonged 169 effort at urging and directing the Department of Defense to further examine the Arctic's 170 strategic interest to the U.S. Russia and China continue to aggressively push their security 171 interests in the region as evidenced in recent years by the joint convoys of their military 172 vessels that entered the U.S. EEZ in the Bering Sea as well as aggressive Russian flight 173 incursions into Alaska -area air space. As has been included in our past Resolutions, 174 selection of Kodiak as a potential military base or staging area as the U.S. expands its 175 security presence in the Arctic is a long-term goal for the Borough. We understand this is 176 a multi -year effort but the Borough urges that Kodiak stay under consideration with the 177 Delegation and Department of Defense for future Arctic security investment. 178 179 180 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE ASSEMBLY OF THE KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH that: Kodiak Island Borough, Alaska Resolution FY20026 & 2027 Page J4 9914$ of 5 AGENDA ITEM #8.a. 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 the Kodiak Island Borough administration is hereby instructed to advise Congress and the appropriate agencies of the United States Federal Government of the Capital Improvement Program and other Federal program priorities adopted by the Kodiak Island Borough Assembly. ADOPTED BY THE ASSEMBLY OF THE KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH THIS DAY OF . 20XX. KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH VOTES: Ayes: Noes: Kodiak Island Borough, Alaska ATTEST: Resolution FY200p26 & 2027 Page 14 poggAof 5 ,b�96kN'in� #s. b. & PW�4 b� -. Nrou& Wwqtr Ch. 3.60 Motor Vehicle Registration Tax I Kodiak Island Borough Code 0 lzl [� q) �, Pagel of 3 Chapter 3.60 MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION TAX Sections: 3.60.010 Established. 3.60.020 Allocation. 3.60.030 Fee imposed. 3.60.040 Annual fee imposed on commercial plates. 3.60.010 Established. The borough hereby elects coverage under the bi-annual motor vehicle registration tax established in AS 28.10.431 et seq. [Ord. 2006-09(A) §2; Ord. 79-42-0 §1, 1979. Formerly §3.32.010]. 3.60.020 Allocation. The use of the motor vehicle registration tax is allocated to the school general obligation bond debt payments and a junk car removal program. Specific allocation of funds will be determined during the annual budget process. [Ord. FY2019-16 §2, 2019; Ord. 2006-09(A) §2; Ord. 87-35-0 §2, 1987. Formerly §3.32.020]. 3.60.030 Fee imposed. There is levied a motor vehicle registration tax within the borough pursuant to the provisions of AS 28.10.431 as such statute may hereafter be amended, revised, or replaced. The rate imposed is based upon the age of the vehicles as determined by model year as reflected on the following table: Biennial Tax According to Age of Vehicle Since Model Year Vehicle Type list 2nd 3rd 4th Sth 6th 7th 8th or over 1. Motorcycle $40 $40 $40 $40 $40 $40 $40 $40 2. Vehicle specified in AS 300 300 240 240 200 200 180 140 28.10.4-21(b)(1)(A): Noncommercial passenger vehicles, pickup trucks, trucks under The Kodiak Island Borough Code is current through Ordinance FY2026-12, passed November 20, 2025 Page 145 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #8.b. Ch. 3.60 Motor Vehicle Registration Tax I Kodiak Island Borough Code Biennial Tax According to Age of Vehicle Since Model Year Page 2 of 3 8th or Vehicle Type 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Sth 6th 7th over 10,000 pounds unladen weight, and low speed vehicles 3. Vehicles specified in AS 300 300 260 260 240 240 200 180 28.10.421(b)(1)(B): Taxicabs 4. Vehicles specified in AS 28.10.421(c)(1) - (4): commercial vehicles for hire based on unladen weight of a. 5,000 pounds or less 300 300 260 260 240 240 200 180 b. 5,001 - 12,000 pounds 400 400 400 400 360 320 280 240 c. 12,001 - 18,000 pounds 600 600 560 560 480 480 440 400 d.18,001 pounds and 700 700 650 650 600 550 500 500 over 5. Vehicles specified in AS 300 300 260 260 240 240 200 180 28.10.421(b)(43)(B): Motor buses with a seating capacity for 20 or more persons and used exclusively for commercial purposes in the transporting of visitors or tourists 6. Vehicles specified in AS 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 28.10.4210): Noncommercial trailers, including rental trailers 7. Vehicles specified in AS 150 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 28.10.421(d)(8): Amateur mobile radio station vehicles The Kodiak Island Borough Code is current through Ordinance FY2026-12, passed November 20, 2025. Page 146 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #8.b. Ch. 3.60 Motor Vehicle Registration Tax I Kodiak Island Borough Code Biennial Tax According to Age of Vehicle Since Model Year Page 3 of 3 Vehicle Type 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th or over 8. Vehicles specified in AS 300 300 240 240 200 200 180 180 28.10.421(b)(2): Noncommercial motorhomes not registered in the name of a company or business 9. Vehicles eligible for 300 dealer plates under AS 28.10.421(d)(9) [Ord. FY2021-16 §2, 2020; Ord. 2006-09(A) §2. Formerly §3.32.030]. 3.60.040 Annual fee imposed on commercial plates. Commercial rates may be paid annually by paying one-half of the amount shown above and adding $30.00 to the amount reflected above. [Ord. FY2021-16 §3, 2020; Ord. 2006-09(A) §2. Formerly §3.32.0401. The Kodiak Island Borough Code is current through Ordinance FY2026-12, passed November 20, 2025. Disclaimer: The borough clerk's office has the official version of the Kodiak Island Borough Code. Users should contact the borough clerk's office for ordinances passed subsequent to the ordinance cited above. Borough Website: www.kodiakak.us Borough Telephone: (907) 486-9300 -.. The Kodiak Island Borough Code is current through Ordinance FY2026-12, passed November 20, 2025. Page 147 of 149 POLL OF MUNICIPALITIES REQUIRING WITNESSING/ATTESTING ON BY -MAIL BALLOTS/ABSENTEE BALLOTS Municipality Requires Attest Do Not Require Attest Kachemak City Yes City of Wasilla Yes Fairbanks North Star Borough Yes City of Fairbanks Yes Bethel Yes City of Kenai Yes City of Gustavus Yes Matsu Yes City of Wrangell Yes Petersburg Borough Yes City of Houston Yes Aleutians East Borough Yes Anchorage Anchorage doesn't require a witness signature unless the voter is unable to sign. Juneau No State of Alaska From: Kontogonis, Sophia A (GOV) Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2025 1 AU PM To: 'Nova Javier' <nlavier ,kodiakak.us>; Wilson, Ryan M (GOV) <ryan.wilson(a_alaska.gov> Subject: RE: Attest/Witnessing of Absentee by-mail/by mail voting ballots Nova, Per Alaska Statute As 15.20.081 (d) a witness signature is required. Ultimately, the witness requirement is 18 years of age or older. I pasted the full language below. There has been push back in legislation on the witness signature requirement over the last few elections but until statute changes, we require it on by -mail envelopes. Our by -mail envelope looks similar to the one pictured below. I do not have access to the most current version, but I can get a copy if you like. Nova's note: Copy emailed to me. (d) Upcn rece_pt c_ an absentee ballot by mail, the voter, in the presence of a notary public, commissioned officer of the armed forces including the National Guard, district judge or magistrate, United States postal official, registration official, or other person qualified to administer oaths, may proceed to mark the ballot in secret, to place the ballot in the secrecy sleeve, to place the secrecy sleeve in the envelope provided, and to sign the voter's certificate on the envelope in the presence of an official listed in this subsection who shall sign as attesting official and shall date the signature. If none of the officials listed in this subsection is reasonably accessible, an absentee voter shall sign the voter's certificate in the presence of an individual who is 18 years of age or older, who shall sign as a witness and attest to the date on which the voter signed the certificate in the individual's presence, and, in addition, the voter shall certify, as prescribed in AS 09.63.020, under penalty of perjury, that the statements in the voter's certification are true. Page 148 of 149 AGENDA ITEM #8.b. KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH Meeting Type: Assembly Work Session Please PRINT your name legibly Date: Df[ZvA OY r I(, 202_C Phone number !�J-a I k'A ".,1 90-7 Page 149 of 149