Loading...
1992-09-30 Regular MeetingI. II. KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING - SEPTEMBER 30, 1992 MINUTES CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order at 7:35 p.m. by Chair Jon Aspgren on September 30, 1992 in the Borough Assembly Chambers. ROLL CALL Commissioners Present: Jon Aspgren, Chair Jerrol Friend Robin Heinrichs Jody Hodgins Clay Koplin Commissioners Absent: Others Present: Linda Freed, Director Community Development Dept. Duane Dvorak, Associate Planner Community Development Dept. Eileen Probasco, Secretary Community Development Dept. Tuck Bonney - Excused William Matzell - Resigned, effective September 17, 1992. A quorum was established. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Staff reported the following additions/deletions to the agenda: ADDITIONS IV MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETINGS Special meeting of August 26, 1992 IX COMMUNICATIONS A) Memorandum dated August 31, 1992, to Linda Freed, from Bill Matzelle, Commissioner, RE: Letter of Resignation, effective September 17, 1992. B) Kodiak Island Borough Parks and Recreation Committee meeting minutes - July 28, 1992. C) Letter dated August 31, 1992 to Kodiak Island Borough Community Development Department and Planning and Zoning Commission, from Lee James and Associates, RE: Case 92-018, Request for a similar uses determination at Seaside Seafood on Shelikof Street. KIBS227737 P & Z Minutes: September 30, 1992 Page 1 of 16 IV. V D) Letters dated September 14 & 15, 1992 to Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, from Lee James and Associates, RE: Case 92-018. E) Letter dated September 10, 1992 to Don Arndt, from Bob Scholze, RE: Junkyard on Lots 1 & 2, Block 1, Miller Point Alaska Subdivision, First Addition. F) Memorandum dated September 24, 1992 to File, from Bob Scholze, RE: Junk on Lot 5, Block 7, Monashka Bay Subdivision. G) Memorandum dated September 25, 1992 to Joel Bolger, Borough Attorney, from Bob Scholze, RE: Status of junk removal from Lots 1, 3, & 10, Tona Subdivision. DELETIONS G) CASE: 92-029 APPLICANT: Kodiak Island Borough REQUEST: Review of a land disposal for fair market value, in accordance with KIBC Section 18.20.030 A (Review by the Planning and Zoning Commission) and 18.20.100 B (Disposal for Fair Market Value) of Lot 2, Block 1, Kadiak Alaska Subdivision, First Addition. LOCATION: 3219 Perenosa Drive ZONING: R-3--Multi Family Residential This case was withdrawn at the request of the Borough Resource Management Officer. The previous owner of this tax -foreclosed parcel has brought the account current and will retain the property. COMMISSIONER HODGINS MOVED TO ACCEPT the agenda with the additions/deletions reported by staff. The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous voice vote. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING COMMISSIONER HEINRICHS MOVED TO ACCEPT the minutes of the August 19, 1992 Planning and Zoning Commission regular meeting and the August 26, 1992 special meeting as presented. The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous voice vote. AUDIENCE COMMENTS AND APPEARANCE REQUESTS There were no audience comments. A) Case S90-033. Request for a one (1) year extension of the preliminary approval of the subdivision of Lot 5A, U.S. Survey 2538-A, into Lots 5A-1 and 5A-2, U.S. Survey 2538-A. 623 to 815 Rezanof Drive and off of Egan Way (Kodiak Island Borough). K1BS22gg39 P & Z Minutes: September 30, 1992 Page 2 of 16 COMMISSIONER HODGINS MOVED TO GRANT a one (1) year extension of preliminary approval of the subdivision of Lot 5A, U.S. Survey 2538 creating Lots 5A1 and 5A2, U.S. Survey 2538, and to affirm the original conditions of approval as shown in the staff report dated September 16, 1992. The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll call vote. There were no further appearance requests. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS A) Case 92-019. Request for a rezone, in accordance with Section 17.72.030 B (Manner of Initiation) of the Borough Code, of a five (5) acre parcel of land located in Hidden Basin, in Ugak Bay, from C--Conservation to RD--Rural Development. Head of Ugak Bay, South shore of Hidden Basin, on Kodiak Island (postponed from the August, 1992 regular meeting). DUANE DVORAK indicated 35 public hearing notices were mailed for this case and one was returned this month, requesting more information and generally opposing this request. Staff recommended forwarding this request to the Borough Assembly with a recommendation of approval. Regular Session Closed. Public Hearing Opened: Ginny Sargent appeared before the Commission and expressed opposition to this request unless the applicants were required to install proper water and wastewater facilities. Ron Doubt appeared before the Commission and expressed opposition to this request. Public Hearing Closed. Regular Session Opened. There was some discussion among the Commissioners concerning DEC and other governmental regulations, and the avenues which could be pursued to ensure compliance with these regulations. COMMISSIONER HEINRICHS recommended that DEC be made aware of this rezone and of the concerns expressed by the public and the Commission. He also recommended that future rezone investigations specifically address the feasibility of compliance with DEC regulations. COMMISSIONER HEINRICHS MOVED TO RECOMMEND that the Kodiak Island Borough Assembly approve the rezone of a five (5) acre parcel of land located in Hidden Basin, in Ugak Bay (specifically, ASLS 77-131), from C--Conservation to RD-- Rural Development; and to adopt the findings contained in the staff report dated August 10, 1992, as "Findings of Fact" for this case. ICIBS227739 P & Z Minutes: September 30, 1992 Page 3 of 16 FINDINGS OF FACT Section 17.72.020 states that the Commission shall incorporate the following criteria into their report to the Assembly: 1. Findings as to the Need and Justification for a Change or Amendment. A rezone from C--Conservation to RD--Rural Development is needed and justified because the RD--Rural Development zoning district permits development that: A. is consistent with the traditional development of remote upland areas around Kodiak Island; B. will not create any nonconforming uses; C. will make conforming those commercial sport hunting and fishing lodge operations presently operating on the site. 2. Findings as to the Effect a Change or Amendment would have on the Objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The 1968 Comprehensive Plan does not address this area. The coastal area of Kodiak Island has been traditionally used for commercial purposes over the years, particularly those areas which have the highest fish and wildlife values. Much of the commercial activity has been directly related to fish and wildlife resources. A good shoreline location is especially important in terms of access by boat or airplane, as is a good source of fresh water and a safe anchorage. Where the RD--Rural Development is implemented, land owners will be permitted to develop commercial uses consistent with traditional commercial developments of the past, subject to the reasonable standards established for this zoning district. The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll call vote. B) Case 92-020. Request for a rezone, in accordance with Section 17.72.030 B (Manner of Initiation) of the Borough Code, of the Olga Bay Cannery Cove -Cannery Complex from C-- Conservation to RD--Rural Development. Generally located along the North shore of Olga Bay (postponed from the August, 1992 regular meeting). DUANE DVORAK indicated 8 public hearing notices were mailed for this case and one was returned this month, opposing this request. Staff recommended forwarding this request to the Borough Assembly with a recommendation of approval. Regular Session Closed. Public Hearing Opened: KIBS227740 P & Z Minutes: September 30, 1992 Page 4 of 16 Fred Coyle, Vice President of Akhiok-Kaguyak, Inc. appeared before the Commission and expressed support for this request. Public Hearing Closed. Regular Session Opened. LINDA FREED stated for the record, that 4 members of the Commission, along with an AKI representative and CDD staff members, were able to make a site visit to the south end of Kodiak Island to view the areas proposed for rezoning in the Akhiok area, as well as the Hidden Basin site, several weeks prior to the regular meeting. COMMISSIONER FRIEND MOVED TO RECOMMEND that the Kodiak Island Borough Assembly approve the rezone of the Cannery Cove -Cannery Complex in Olga Bay from C-- Conservation to RD--Rural Development; and to adopt the findings contained in the staff report dated August 10, 1992, as "Findings of Fact" for this case. FINDINGS OF FACT Section 17.72.020 states that the Commission shall incorporate the following criteria into their report to the Assembly: 1. Findings as to the Need and Justification for a Change or Amendment. A rezone from C--Conservation to RD--Rural Development is needed and justified because the RD--Rural Development zoning district permits development that: A. is consistent with the traditional development of remote upland areas around Kodiak Island; B. will not create any nonconforming uses; C. will make conforming, those commercial sport hunting and fishing operations presently operating on the site. 2. Findings as to the Effect a Change or Amendment would have on the Objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The 1968 Comprehensive Plan does not address this r' area. The coastal area of Kodiak Island has been traditionally used for commercial purposes over the years, particularly those areas which have the highest fish and wildlife values. Much of the commercial activity has been directly related to fish and wildlife resources. A good shoreline location is especially important in terms of access by boat or airplane, as is a good source of fresh water and a safe anchorage. Where the RD--Rural Development is implemented, land owners will be permitted to develop commercial uses consistent with traditional commercial developments of the past, subject KIBS227741 P & Z Minutes: September 30, 1992 Page 5 of 16 to the reasonable standards established for this zoning district. The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll call vote. .— C) Case 92-021. Request for a rezone, in accordance with Section 17.72.030 B (Manner of Initiation) of the Borough Code, of a five (5) acre parcel on Upper Olga Lake from C-- Conservation to RD--Rural Development. Within Protracted Section 15, T36S, R31W, along the south shore of Upper Olga Lake (postponed from the August, 1992 regular meeting). DUANE DVORAK indicated 11 public hearing notices were mailed for this case and none were returned. Staff recommended forwarding this request to the Borough Assembly with a recommendation of approval. Regular Session Closed. Public Hearing Opened: Seeing and hearing none. Public Hearing Closed. Regular Session Opened. --- COMMISSIONER FRIEND MOVED TO RECOMMEND that the Kodiak Island Borough Assembly approve the rezone of a five (5) acre parcel of land located on the south shore of Upper Olga Lake, from C--Conservation to RD--Rural Development; and to adopt the findings contained in the staff report dated August 10, 1992, as "Findings of Fact" for this case. FINDINGS OF FACT Section 17.72.020 states that the Commission shall incorporate the following criteria into their report to the Assembly: 1. Findings as to the Need and Justification for a Change or Amendment. A rezone from C--Conservation to RD--Rural Development is needed and justified because the RD--Rural Development zoning district permits development that: A. is consistent with the traditional development of remote upland areas around Kodiak Island; B. will not create any nonconforming uses; C. supports those commercial sport hunting and fishing operations. 2. Findings as to the Effect a Change or Amendment would have on the Objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. KIBS227742 P & Z Minutes: September 30, 1992 Page 6 of 16 The 1968 Comprehensive Plan does not address this area. The coastal area of Kodiak Island (including areas adjacent to anadromous freshwater lakes) has been traditionally used for commercial purposes over the years, particularly those areas which have the highest fish and wildlife values. Much of the commercial activity has been directly related to fish and wildlife resources. A good shoreline location is especially important in terms of access by boat or airplane, as is a good source of fresh water and a safe anchorage. Where the RD--Rural Development is implemented, land owners will be permitted to develop commercial uses consistent with traditional commercial developments of the past, subject to the reasonable standards established for this zoning district. The motion was seconded. COMMISSIONER HEINRICHS requested that before the rezone request was sent to the Assembly, that it provide for a more specific aliquot parts description. The MOTION was voted upon and CARRIED by unanimous roll call vote. D) Case 92-026. Request for a variance from Section 17.17.050 A.1 (Yards) of the Borough Code, to permit a 20' X 25' addition to an existing single family dwelling, to encroach no more than 12' into the required 25' front setback. Lot 9, Block 5, Monashka Bay Subdivision, 3291 Lakeview Drive. DUANE DVORAK indicated 23 public hearing notices were mailed for this case and none were returned. Staff recommended approval of this request. Regular Session Closed. Public Hearing Opened: Seeing and hearing none. Public Hearing Closed. Regular Session Opened. COMMISSIONER HODGINS MOVED TO GRANT a variance from Section 17.17.050.A1 (Yards) of the Borough Code, to permit a 20' X 25' addition to an existing single family dwelling, to encroach no more than 12' into the required 25' front setback on Lot 9, Block 5, Monashka Bay Subdivision; and to adopt the findings contained in the staff report dated September 16, 1992, as "Findings of Fact" for this case. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or intended use of development, which generally do not apply to other properties in the same land use district. KIBS227743 P & Z Minutes: September 30, 1992 Page 7 of 16 The exceptional physical conditions on the lot are the slopes and the placement of the original house within the front setback. Virtually any reasonable expansion in size of the original dwelling will require a variance. 2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships. Due to the exceptional conditions on the lot noted above, denial of the variance would constitute a practical difficulty and unnecessary hardship to the property owner. The resulting encroachment of the proposed addition will not substantially exceed the existing encroachment of the main structure. 3. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare. Granting this variance to allow an encroachment of the front setback will not result in material damage or prejudice to other property owners in the vicinity. Due to the large lot size required in this zoning district and the small size of the addition, more than adequate separation r— of structures will remain if the variance is granted. The variance will not be detrimental to the public's health, safety or general welfare since all construction standards of the Uniform Building Code will be met as part of the construction permit process. 4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the comprehensive plan which identifies this area for Large Lot, Low Density Residential Development. The addition will not increase the existing density or alter the permitted land uses. 5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance. In this case, actions of the applicant have not caused the '— conditions for which relief is being sought by variance. The Commission will decide this variance request before any further action is taken by the applicant. 6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the district involved. Additions to single-family dwellings are permitted in all residential zoning districts. The motion was seconded. KIBS227744 P & Z Minutes: September 30, 1992 Page 8 of 16 COMMISSIONER HEINRICHS MOVED TO AMEND THE MAIN MOTION by adding the following condition of approval: 1. Prior to issuance of a zoning compliance permit, the applicant shall provide the Community Development Department with an on -site parking plan, designating two (2) offstreet parking spaces. The AMENDMENT was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll call vote. The question was called and the MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED by unanimous roll call vote. E) Case 92-027. Request for a variance from Section 17.17.050 A.1 (Yards) of the Borough Code, to permit a 20' X 20' addition to an existing single family dwelling, to encroach no more than 15 feet into the required 25' front setback. Lot 8, Block 4, Mountain View Subdivision, 2nd Addition, 2632 Devils Prong. DUANE DVORAK indicated 35 public hearing notices were mailed for this case and none were returned. Staff recommended approval of this request. Regular Session Closed. Public Hearing Opened: Mike Melone, applicant, appeared before the Commission and expressed support for this request. Public Hearing Closed. Regular Session Opened. COMMISSIONER FRIEND MOVED TO GRANT a variance from Section 17.17.050.A1 (Yards) of the Borough Code, to permit a 20' X 20' addition to an existing single family dwelling, to encroach no more than 15 feet into the required 25' front setback on Lot 8, Block 4, Mountain View Subdivision, 2nd Addition; and to adopt the findings contained in the staff report dated September 16, 1992, as "Findings of Fact" for this case. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or intended use of development, which generally do not apply to other properties in the same land use district. The exceptional physical conditions on the lot are the slopes and the placement of the original house within the front setback. Virtually any reasonable expansion in size of the original dwelling will require a variance. 2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships KIBS227745 P & Z Minutes: September SO, 1992 Page 9 of 16 Due to the exceptional conditions on the lot noted above, denial of the variance would constitute a practical difficulty and unnecessary hardship to the property owner. The resulting encroachment of the proposed addition will not substantially exceed the existing encroachment of the main structure. 3. The granting of the variance will not result in material damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's health safety and welfare. Granting this variance to allow an encroachment of the front setback will not result in material damage or prejudice to other property owners in the vicinity. Due to the large lot size required in this zoning district and the small size of the addition, more than adequate separation of structures will remain if the variance is granted. The variance will not be detrimental to the public's health, safety or general welfare since all construction standards of the Uniform Building Code will be met as part of the construction permit process. 4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan Granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives of the comprehensive plan which identifies this area for Large Lot, Low Density Residential Development. The addition will not increase the existing density or alter the permitted land uses. 5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the variance. In this case, actions of the applicant have not caused the conditions for which relief is being sought by variance. The Commission will decide this variance request before any further action is taken by the applicant. 6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited land use in the district involved Additions to single-family dwellings are permitted in all residential zoning districts. The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll call vote. F) Case 92-028. Request for a use variance from Section 17.36.030 (Non -conforming Lots of Record) of the Borough Code, to permit a triplex to locate on a non -conforming lot of record (containing 5,499 square feet) where only a single family dwelling is permitted. Lot 28, Block 3, Erskine Subdivision, 214 Rezanof Drive. KIBS227146 P & Z Minutes: September 30, 1992 Page 10 of 16 DUANE DVORAK indicated 43 public hearing notices were mailed for this case and 3 were returned, 1 opposing this request, 1 concerned about parking, and 1 from DOT stating that access to this lot from Rezanof Drive would be limited to one driveway permit. A memo from the applicant was received r- on September 28, requesting postponement of this request until the October regular meeting. Staff concurred. Regular Session Closed. Public Hearing Opened: Seeing and hearing none. Public Hearing Closed. Regular Session Opened. COMMISSIONER HODGINS MOVED TO POSTPONE ACTION on this request, and schedule it for a public hearing at the October, 1992 regular meeting. The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll call vote. G) Case 92-029. Review of a land disposal for fair market value, in accordance with KIBC Section 18.20.030A (Review by the Planning and Zoning Commission) and 18.20.10013 (Disposal for Fair Market Value) of Lot 2, Block 1, Kadiak Alaska Subdivision, First Addition, 3219 Perenosa Drive. DUANE DVORAK indicated this case was withdrawn at the request of the Borough Resource Management Officer. The previous owner of this tax -foreclosed parcel has brought the account current and will retain the property. No public hearing was held, and no action was taken on this case. H) Capital Improvements Projects FY 94-98 Planning and Zoning Commission review, under Section 2.40.030 E (Powers and Duties) of the Borough Code, of a list of recommended Capital Improvements which are necessary or desirable to be constructed during the next five (5) year period (Fiscal year 1994 through fiscal year 1998). LINDA FREED indicated no public hearing notices were mailed for this case. Staff recommended that the Planning and Zoning Commission consider which projects it feels should be included r-- in the Borough -wide CIP list and what priority those projects should have, based on the Commission's land use/development perspective. Regular Session Closed. Public Hearing Opened: Seeing and hearing none. Public Hearing Closed. Regular Session Opened. KIBS227747 P & Z Minutes: September 30, 1992 Page 11 of 16 COMMISSIONER HEINRICHS MOVED TO RECOMMEND that the Kodiak Island Borough Assembly incorporate the following projects in the priority listed into the Borough's adopted CIP list for FY94 through FY98: 1. Mill Bay Road reconstruction 2. Rezanof Drive resurfacing from Speedy Kraft to the Borough Landfill 3. Water Filtration Plant for the urban area water system (construction) 4. Sewer Treatment Plant upgrade and infrastructure to handle the build out of the urban area 5. Service District One water and sewer completion 6. Spruce Cape Road reconstruction - upgrade and walkway 7. Monashka Bay sewer and water (design and engineering) 8. Selief Lane drainage (design and construction) 9. Road design funds for Three Sisters, Sawmill Extension, Peninsula Drive, Otmeloi Way, etc. 10. Acquisition and construction of small boat launch for Monashka and Ugak bays. The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll call vote. I) Case 92-030. Request for a rezone, in accordance with Section 17.72.030 B (Manner of Initiation) of the Borough Code, of the contiguous piece of land owned by the City of Kodiak and generally referred to as the Kodiak Municipal Airport, from I --Industrial to LI--Light Industrial, or B--Business. DUANE DVORAK indicated 126 public hearing notices were mailed for this case and one was returned, opposing this request. Staff recommended forwarding this request, recommending approval, to the Borough Assembly. Regular Session Closed. Public Hearing Opened: George McCorkle, representing the City of Kodiak, appeared before the Commission and expressed support for this request. Public Hearing Closed. Regular Session Opened. COMMISSIONER HEINRICHS MOVED TO RECOMMEND that the Kodiak Island Borough Assembly approve a rezone, in accordance with Section 17.72.030B (Manner of Initiation) of KIBS227748 P & Z Minutes: September 30, 1992 Page 12 of 16 the Borough Code, of the contiguous piece of land owned by the City of Kodiak and generally referred to as the Kodiak Municipal Airport, from I --Industrial to LI--Light Industrial, in accordance with Section 17.72.030 of the Borough Code and to adopt the findings contained in the staff report dated September 16, 1992 as "Findings of Fact" for this case. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Findings as to the Need and Justification for a change or Amendment. The rezone of the Kodiak Municipal Airport, from I -- Industrial to the LI--Light Industrial zoning district is necessary and justified because the Light Industrial Zoning District permits development that: A. is consistent with the development trends in this area; B. is suitable for the property as a whole, given the physical characteristics and location of the tract; C. will not create any nonconforming land uses on the tract identified for rezone. D. is consistent with the existing and anticipated future development of this area. 2. Findings as to the Effect a Change or Amendment would have on the Objectives of the Comprehensive Plan The 1991 Lakeside Subdivision/Safeway Sub -area Comprehensive Plan indicates this area for General Business. The proposed Light Industrial zoning district is a comparable zone which evolved out of the recently adopted plan. This zone permits the types and kinds of uses envisioned in the plan for this area. This zoning change would generally be consistent with the objectives of the comprehensive plan, as well as providing for a balanced mix of land uses when viewed on a community wide basis. The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll call vote. '— J) Case 92-031. Planning and Zoning Commission review of a detailed site plan of Abercrombie State Park to document the layout of existing facilities, and to permit future development of planned park related facilities. Within U.S. Survey 3462, generally known as Miller Point. DUANE DVORAK indicated 36 public hearing notices were mailed for this case and none were returned. A letter from the agent, Claire Holland, was received stating that she would be out of town on State business for the regular meeting, and that if the Commission had any specific questions or problems with KIBS227749 P & Z Minutes: September 30, 1992 Page 13 of 16 this request, she would like the case to be postponed until the October meeting, when she could be present. Staff recommended approval of the submitted site plan. Regular Session Closed. Public Hearing Opened: Seeing and hearing none. Public Hearing Closed. Regular Session Opened. COMMISSIONER HODGINS MOVED TO APPROVE the detailed site plan of Abercrombie State Park, documenting the layout of existing facilities, and permitting future development of park related facilities within U.S. Survey 3462, generally known as Miller Point, as depicted in the site plan for this case. The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll call vote. VII. OLD BUSINESS There was no old business. VIII. NEW BUSINESS A) Preliminary investigation of the rezone of the Kodiak State Airport Complex from C--Conservation to more appropriate zoning districts. Generally located between the Buskin River and the U.S. Coast Guard Base. DUANE DVORAK, stated that Staff had attempted several times to make contact with appropriate State, Department of Transportation officials to make arrangements for discussions with the Commission concerning the impacts of rezoning the Kodiak State Airport complex. Staff recommended this investigation continue and that the Commission schedules a worksession with DOT representatives, and that this case be scheduled as a public hearing item at the November, 1992 regular meeting. COMMISSIONER HEINRICHS MOVED TO INITIATE a rezone and concurrent CUP request to rezone the contiguous Kodiak State Airport complex, in accordance with Section 17.72.030B (Manner of Initiation) of the Borough Code, from C-- Conservation to appropriate zoning districts and to direct staff to prepare an investigation report and recommendation to be scheduled for public hearing at the regular Commission meeting in November, 1992. The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll call vote. KIBS227750 P & Z Minutes: September 30, 1992 Page 14 of 16 IX. COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSIONER HODGINS MOVED TO ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT of items A through G of communications. The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous voice vote. A) Memorandum dated August 31, 1992, to Linda Freed, from Bill Matzelle, Commissioner, RE: Letter of Resignation, effective September 17, 1992. B) Kodiak Island Borough Parks and Recreation Committee meeting minutes - July 28, 1992. C) Letter dated August 31, 1992 to Kodiak Island Borough Community Development Department and Planning and Zoning Commission, from Lee James and Associates, RE: Case 92-018, Request for a similar uses determination at Seaside Seafood on Shelikof Street. D) Letters dated September 14 & 15, 1992 to Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, from Lee James and Associates, RE: Case 92-018. E) Letter dated September 10, 1992 to Don Arndt, from Bob Scholze, RE: Junkyard on Lots 1 & 2, Block 1, Miller Point Alaska Subdivision, First Addition. F) Memorandum dated September 24, 1992 to File, from Bob Scholze, RE: Junk on Lot 5, Block 7, Monashka Bay Subdivision. G) Memorandum dated September 25, 1992 to Joel Bolger, Borough Attorney, from Bob Scholze, RE: Status of junk removal from Lots 1, 3, & 10, Tona Subdivision. There were no further communications. X. REPORTS COMMISSIONER HODGINS MOVED TO ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT of items A and B of reports. The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous voice vote. A) Community Development Department Status Report. B) Community Development Department Plat Activity Report. There were no further reports. XI. AUDIENCE COMMENTS There were no audience comments. XII. COMMISSIONERS' COMMENTS XIII. ADJOURNMENT CHAIR ASPGREN adjourned the meeting at 9:00. KIBS227751 P & Z Minutes: September 30, 1992 Page 15 of 16 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Y: 4w n As l n, Ch ATTEST BY L emu. _ sY/W�e s Eileen Probasco, Secretary Community Development Department DATE APPROVED: October 21, 1992 KIBS227752 P & Z Minutes: September 30, 1992 Page 16 of 16