1992-04-15 Regular MeetingI.
II.
KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING - APRIL 15, 1992
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER
The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission was
called to order at 7:35 p.m. by Chair Tom Hendel on Wednesday,
April 15, 1992 in the Borough Assembly Chambers.
ROLL CALL
Commissioners Present
Tom Hendel, Chair
Jon Aspgren
Tuck Bonney
Jody Hodgins
Bill Matzell
Commissioners Absent:
Jerrol Friend - excused
Robin Heinrichs - excused
A quorum was established.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Others Present:
Linda Freed, Director
Community Development Dept.
Eileen Probasco, Secretary
Community Development Dept.
Staff reported the following additions to the agenda:
IX COMMUNICATIONS
A. Minutes of Joint Building Code Review Committee
meeting held March 31, 1992.
B. Letter dated April 10, 1992 from Gerald Lee Sharp,
Attorney, to Linda Freed RE: Recent Planning
Commissioners Training Seminar, and the Open
Meetings Act.
COMMISSIONER ASPGREN MOVED TO ACCEPT the agenda with
the additions reported by staff. The motion was seconded and
CARRIED by unanimous voice vote.
IV. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
COMMISSIONER ASPGREN MOVED TO ACCEPT the minutes of the
March 18, 1992 Planning and Zoning Commission regular meeting as
presented. The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous
voice vote.
KIBS227632
P & Z Minutes: April 15, 1992 Page 1 of 15
V. AUDIENCE COMMENTS AND APPEARANCE REQUESTS
There were no audience comments.
VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A) Case 92-003. Investigation, per Section 17.72.030B (Manner
of Initiation) of the Borough Code, of the rezone of U.S. Survey
1889 and a tract of land generally located between Dog Salmon
Creek and Horse Marine Lagoon, from C--Conservation to RD--
Rural Development (Postponed and revised from the February,
1992 regular meeting).
LINDA FREED indicated 11 public hearing notices were mailed
for this case in February and 3 were returned, 1 opposing, and
2 requesting further information. Eleven public hearing
notices were mailed in April and 4 were returned prior to the
meeting, 3 opposing and 1 expressing concern of the request.
Staff recommended forwarding this case to the Assembly with
a recommendation for approval.
Regular Session Closed.
Public Hearing Opened:
Dick Munoz, representing Kodiak National Wildlife Refuge,
appeared before the Commission and expressed concern for the
impact this rezone request could have on KNWR lands.
Ralph Eluska, representative of Akhiok-Kaguyak, Inc. appeared
before the Commission and expressed support for this request,
and to answer questions.
David Jones, lodge operator, appeared before the Commission
and expressed support for this request.
Tom Sweeney appeared before the Commission and expressed
support for this request.
Irene Coyle appeared before the Commission and expressed
opposition to this request.
Nelle Murray appeared before the Commission and expressed
concern for this request, and said that she would like to see a
Comprehensive Plan developed for this area addressing shore
line development.
Nina Burkholder appeared before the Commission and
expressed opposition for this request, due to the potential for
conflicts between sport fishermen and commercial fishermen in
the area.
A letter from Toni Munsey, opposing the rezone request, was
requested to be read into the minutes.
Public Hearing Closed.
Regular Session Opened.
KIBS227633
P & Z Minutes: April 15, 1992 Page 2 of 15
COMMISSIONER BONNEY expressed concern for the size of the
parcel of land requested for rezone by AKI. Linda Freed
suggested they might split the request into two motions, to
address each parcel individually, to allow for amending the size
of that parcel.
COMMISSIONER MATZELL MOVED TO RECOMMEND that
the Kodiak Island Borough Assembly approve the rezone of site
one (1) located at the East end of Olga Bay (near Horse Marine
Lagoon) from C--Conservation to RD--Rural Development,
described as follows:
Site 1: U.S. Survey 1889, comprising 19.30 acres,
in accordance with Chapter 17.72 of the Borough Code, and to
adopt the findings contained in the staff report dated April 1,
1992, as "Findings of Fact" for this case.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Section 17.72.020 states that the Commission shall incorporate
the following criteria into their report to the Assembly:
1. Findings as to the Need and Justification for a Change or
Amendment.
'-- A rezone from C--Conservation to RD--Rural Development
is needed and justified because the RD--Rural
Development zoning district permits development that:
A. is consistent with the traditional development of
remote upland areas around Kodiak Island;
B. will not create any nonconforming uses;
C. will make conforming those commercial sport
hunting and fishing operations presently permitted
by a temporary exception.
2. Findings as to the Effect a Change or Amendment would
have on the Objectives of the Comprehensive Plan.
The 1968 Comprehensive Plan does not address this
area. The coastal area of Kodiak Island has been
traditionally used for commercial purposes over the
years, particularly those areas which have the highest
fish and wildlife values. Much of the commercial activity
has been directly related to fish and wildlife resources. A
good shoreline location is especially important in terms
of access by boat or airplane, as is a good source of fresh
water and a safe anchorage. Where the RD--Rural
Development zoning district is implemented, land owners
will be permitted to develop commercial uses, consistent
with traditional commercial developments of the past,
subject to the reasonable standards established for this
zoning district.
P & Z Minutes: April 15, 1992 KiBS227634 Page 3 of 15
The motion was seconded and CARRIED by a roll call vote of
4-1, COMMISSIONER ASPGREN voted NO.
COMMISSIONER HODGINS MOVED TO RECOMMEND that
the Kodiak Island Borough Assembly approve the rezone of site
two (2) located at the East end of Olga Bay (near Horse Marine
Lagoon) from C--Conservation to RD--Rural Development,
described as follows:
Site 2: S 1/2, SE 1/4, Sec. 23
S 1/2, SW 1/4, Sec. 24
N 1/2, NW 1/4, Sec. 25
N 1/2, NE 1/4, Sec. 26
located within T30S, R30W comprising
approximately 128 acres,
in accordance with Chapter 17.72 of the Borough Code, and to
adopt the findings contained in the staff report dated April 1,
1992 (listed above) as "Findings of Fact" for this case.
The motion was seconded.
COMMISSIONER BONNEY MOVED TO AMEND THE MAIN
MOTION to limit the parcel to twenty (20) acres, to be
designated by the applicant, and presented to the Commission
prior to submittal to the Assembly.
The AMENDMENT was seconded and CARRIED by a roll call
vote of 4-1, COMMISSIONER ASPGREN voted NO.
The question was called and the MAIN MOTION AS
AMENDED CARRIED by a roll call vote of 4-1,
COMMISSIONER ASPGREN voted NO.
* * SEE PAGE 15, REPORTS, FOR FURTHER ACTION ON
THIS CASE * *
B) Case 92-005. Request for rezone, in accordance with Section
17.72.030 (Manner of Initiation) of the Borough Code, of Tracts
I-1 and 1-2, U.S. Survey 3218 from RR1--Rural Residential One
to B--Business (postponed and revised from the March, 1992
regular meeting).
LINDA FREED indicated public 44 hearing notices were mailed
for this case and 1 was returned, in favor of this request. Staff
recommends the Commission forward this request to the
Assembly with a recommendation for approval.
Regular Session Closed.
Public Hearing Opened:
Tom Sweeney appeared before the Commission and expressed
support for this request.
Public Hearing Closed.
Regular Session Opened.
KIBS227635
P & Z Minutes: April 15, 1992 Page 4 of 15
COMMISSIONER HODGINS MOVED TO RECOMMEND the
Borough Assembly approve this request to rezone Tracts 1-1
and I-2, U.S. Survey 3218 from RR1--Rural Residential One to
B--Business, in accordance with Section 17.72.055
(Submission to Assembly) of the Borough Code, and to approve
the findings contained in the staff report dated April 2, 1991 as
"Findings of Fact" for this case.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Findings as to the Need and Justification for a Change or
Amendment.
The rezone of Tract I-1 and I-2, U.S. Survey 3218 from
RR1--Rural Residential One to B--Business is necessary
and justified because the B--Business zoning district
permits development that:
A. is generally consistent with the comprehensive
plan designation for the area as a whole, and
B. is consistent with the trend of small lot commercial
development along Mill Bay Road.
2. Findings as to the Effect a Change or Amendment would
have on the Objectives of the Comprehensive Plan.
The 1968 Kodiak Island Borough Comprehensive Plan, as
amended, indicates these two tracts for medium density
residential development. The surrounding tracts are
designated for future commercial development. It is
clear from the trend along Mill Bay Road that the plan
designation for these two lots is an anomaly and that it is
generally consistent with the objectives of the plan to
rezone these lots to a zone consistent with that intended
for the majority of the surrounding lots and tracts. The
non -conforming residential structures that will be created
by this rezone can be converted to commercial uses or
can be utilized for residential purposes for the life of the
structures.
The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll
call vote.
C) Case 92-006. Request for a Conditional Use Permit in
accordance with Section 17.13.030 (Conditional Uses) of the
Borough Code to permit the construction of a 40' X 100'
aircraft hangar; and
A variance from Sections 17.13.040 (Area) and 17.13.050
(Yards) of the Borough Code to permit the hangar to encroach
72 feet into the required 75 foot front yard setback, 50 feet into
the required 50 foot setback along the southwest side lot line,
25 feet into the required 75 foot rear setback and 20 feet into
the required 50 foot setback along the north east side lot line
on a leased lot with 18,404 square feet.
KIBS227636
P & Z Minutes: April 15, 1992 Page 5 of 15
LINDA FREED indicated 17 public hearing notices were mailed
for this case and 1 was returned in favor of this request. Staff
recommended approval of this request.
COMMISSIONER ASPGREN declared he had a conflict of
interest in this case, as he was the contractor for the applicant.
CHAIR HENDEL determined there was a conflict, and
COMMISSIONER ASPGREN was excused from the chamber for
this case.
Regular Session Closed.
Public Hearing Opened:
Seeing and hearing none.
Public Hearing Closed.
Regular Session Opened.
COMMISSIONER HODGINS MOVED TO GRANT a conditional
use permit in accordance with Section 17.13.030A (Conditional
Uses) of the Borough Code to permit the construction of a 40' X
100' aircraft hangar on Lease Lot 3, Block 1600, U.S. Survey
2539; and to adopt the findings contained in the staff report
dated April 6, 1992 as "Findings of Fact" for this CUP.
FINDINGS OF FACT - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
1. That the conditional use will preserve the value spirit
character and integrity of the surrounding area.
The conditional use will preserve the character and
integrity of the surrounding area which has historically
been used for airport related activities since before the
advent of the current zoning codes. The proposed
aircraft hangar will not impact the surrounding airport
land uses. The proposed hangar will increase only
slightly the intensity of use in the vicinity. The proposed
hangar will be compatible with the existing airport land
uses and activities in the area. Similar CUP's and
variances were granted for airport structures on
adjoining Lots 3 and 5, Cases 84-013 and 84-012,
respectively.
2. That the conditional use fulfills all other requirements of
this chapter pertaining to the conditional use in question
Aside from the variances required (which are addressed
later in the staff report), the proposed addition will fulfill
all other requirements of the C--Conservation zoning
district (Chapter 17.13).
3. That granting the conditional use permit will not be
harmful to the public health, safety, convenience and
comfort.
The proposed use will not be harmful to the public
health, safety, convenience, or comfort. The request
KIBS227637
P & Z Minutes: April 15, 1992 Page 6 of 15
does not involve a land use that is significantly different
from other existing uses in the area. The agreement
between the lessee and the State of Alaska Department of
Transportation specifies that the use of the tract for the
duration of the lease must be for airport related purposes.
Construction of additional airport facilities will be an
improvement to the community by providing more
capacity to store and maintain small aircraft or provide
for other airport related activities.
4. The sufficient setbacks, lot area, buffers or other
safeguards are being provided to meet the conditions
listed in subsections A through C of this section.
It appears that sufficient setback, lot area, buffers, or
other safeguards are being provided for the proposed
aircraft hangar even if the requested variances are
granted. These issues will be dealt with to a greater
degree in the variance requests which follow.
The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll
call vote.
COMMISSIONER HODGINS MOVED TO GRANT a request for
a variance from Section 17.13.040 (Area) of the Borough Code
to permit a four thousand (4,000) square foot aircraft hangar on
a leased lot with 18,404 square feet rather than the five (5)
acres minimum lot area required for a lot in the C--
Conservation zoning district; and to adopt findings A,
contained in the staff report dated April 6, 1992, as "Findings
of Fact" for this variance.
The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll
call vote.
COMMISSIONER HODGINS MOVED TO GRANT a request for
a variance from Section 17.13.050 (Yards) of the Borough Code
to permit a 4,000 square foot aircraft hangar to encroach 72
feet into the required 75 foot front yard setback, 50 feet into the
required 50 foot setback along the southwest side lot line, 25
feet into the required 75 foot rear setback and 20 feet into the
required 50 foot setback along the north east side lot line on a
leased lot with 18,404 square feet; and to adopt findings B,
contained in the staff report dated April 6, 1992, as "Findings
of Fact" for this variance.
FINDINGS OF FACT - VARIANCES
1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions
applicable to the property or intended use of
development, which generally do not apply to other
properties in the same land use district
A. The unique condition applicable to the intended
development is the size of the lease lots and the
need for efficient utilization of land at the Kodiak
State Airport. The proposed hangar does not need
KIBS227638
P & Z Minutes: April 15, 1992 — — --- - Page 7 of 15
a five (5) acre parcel. Lease lots at the state airport
are intentionally small for this reason.
B. The unique conditions applicable to the intended
development are the size and dimensions of the
lease lot. The lot is rather odd shaped considering
its orientation to the taxiway. In addition, DOT/PF
F
requires a fifty (50) foot minimum setback from the
taxiway. Given the small size, odd shape and
required setback from the taxiway, it is nearly
impossible to locate a reasonable sized hangar
within the remaining setbacks required by the
zoning code.
2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result
in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships
A. Strict application of the zoning ordinance would
require a five acre parcel for any development in
the C--Conservation zoning district. This would be
a practical difficulty and unnecessary hardship
because a larger lot size is not needed for the
aircraft hangar. In addition, strict application of
the code would not allow for nearly all of the
existing airport activities and structures at the
state airport. For that reason, the Commission has
granted similar variances of this nature in the past
for uses in this area. (Cases 84-012 and 84-013
permitted airport structures on adjoining Lots 5
and 3.)
B. Strict application of the zoning ordinance would
not allow a reasonable structure to be built on this
site. This is a practical difficulty and unnecessary
hardship because if no variance is granted the
entire lot would be rendered unusable. In addition,
the Commission has granted similar variances for
airport related uses and structures in this area.
(Cases 84-012 and 84-013 permitted airport
structures on adjoining Lots 5 and 3.)
3. The granting of the variance will not result in material
damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity
nor be detrimental to the public's health safety and
welfare.
A. Granting of the variance will not damage or be
prejudicial to other properties in the area. In
addition, public health, safety, and general welfare
will not be compromised. Other properties in this
area are used for aircraft hangars and airport
related uses. These uses are compatible with and
usually found at airports. The proposed new
hangar will meet all current building and fire
standards as required by the Borough Code. The
property is leased from the Alaska Department of
Transportation and Public Facilities. The terms of
KIBS227639
P & Z Minutes: April 15. 1992 - Page 8 of 15
the airport lease usually covers any potential safety
concerns relating to the operation of airport
facilities.
B. Same as above.
4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the
objectives of the Comprehensive Plan.
A. Granting of the variance will not be contrary to the
objectives of the comprehensive plan because the
airport area is not included in the plan.
B. Same as above.
5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special
conditions or financial hardship from which relief is
being sought by the variance.
A. Actions of the applicant have not caused the
conditions from which relief is being sought by
variance. This variance request will be decided
prior to construction of the proposed aircraft
hangar.
B. Same as above.
6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a
prohibited land use in the district involved
A. The proposed project will meet this criteria as long
a conditional use permit is granted by the Planning
and Zoning Commission, since airports and airport
facilities are conditionally permitted in this district.
B. Same as above.
The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll
call vote.
COMMISSIONER ASPGREN returned to the chambers.
D) Case 92-007. Request for an exception from Section
17.18.020 (Permitted Uses) of the Borough Code to permit the
seasonal use of a community freezer building for small scale
commercial fish smoking operations (to operate only during
and immediately after salmon season openings). Lot 7, Block
9, Ouzinkie Townsite, U.S. Survey 4871.
LINDA FREED indicated 34 public hearing notices were mailed
for this case and none were returned. Staff recommended
approval of this request, subject to conditions, with the revision
of condition #1 to allow for operation between May 1, and
October 15.
Regular Session Closed.
Public Hearing Opened:
KIBS227640
P & Z Minutes: April 15, 1992 Page 9 of 15
Seeing and hearing none.
Public Hearing Closed.
Regular Session Opened.
COMMISSIONER ASPGREN MOVED TO GRANT a request for
an exception from Section 17.18.020 (Permitted Uses) of the
Borough Code to permit the seasonal use of a community
freezer building for small scale commercial fish smoking
operations, subject to the following conditions of approval; and
to adopt the findings contained in the staff report dated April 6,
1992 as "Findings of Fact" for this case.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. Smoking operations will be permitted between the dates
of May 1 through October 15.
2. The duration of this exception is for a period of three (3)
years (seasons), and will expire on October 31, 1994,
subject to earlier termination by the Planning and Zoning
Commission upon investigation and review of complaints
from community residents.
3. Staff will review this exception approval on an annual
basis and monitor this land use for complaints. Any
complaints received will require this exception to be
scheduled for a public hearing and review by the
Planning and Zoning Commission to determine if the fish
smoking operation should be continued.
4. Plans to modify the structure shall be reviewed and
approved by the State Fire Marshall prior to modification
of the existing freezer building.
5. To the extent feasible and prudent, smoking operations
will be conducted on days when the smoke produced will
rise above neighboring structures.
6. The exterior dimensions of the existing freezer building
will not be enlarged to increase the amount of fish that
can be smoked within it. If expansion of the operation is
feasible, a site selection process should be initiated at the
earliest possible time, to provide for an alternate location
where larger scale fish smoking operations may be
r permitted.
11 FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That the use as proposed in the application, or under
appropriate conditions or restrictions, will not (A)
endanger the public's health, safety or general welfare,
(B) be inconsistent with the general purposes and intent
of this title and (C) adversely impact other properties or
uses in the neighborhood.
KIBS227641
P & Z Minutes: April 15, 1992 Page 10 of 15
A. It appears that the proposed use will not endanger
the public's health or safety, provided that
reasonable conditions are placed on the operation
to insure that surrounding property owners are not
adversely impacted. The use of the community
freezer for a small scale commercial fish smoking
operation may enhance the community's general
welfare by providing an additional source of
employment for local residents as well as providing
a value added product for export.
All construction or modification of the facility will
be required to be approved by the State Fire
Marshall, thereby protecting the public health and
safety.
B. The proposed use will be consistent with the
general purposes and intent of Title 17 and with
the authority and purpose of Chapter 17.65
(Exceptions). Exceptions are provided for in the
Borough Code to provide consideration of land uses
that are not permitted in certain zoning districts.
Public/Commercial buildings, facilities and uses
are not permitted in the R 1 --Single-family
Residential zoning district. In this instance, public
buildings are currently located on adjoining
portions of the property and the use of the
community freezer building for a commercial fish
smoking operation has been agreed upon by the
Ouzinkie city and tribal leaders.
C. The proposed use will not adversely impact other
properties or uses in the area, provided that
reasonable conditions of approval are adhered to.
Since this is a pilot project to establish the
feasibility of this venture and establish a market for
the product, the exception will be temporary in
nature and provide for a suitable trial period. The
exception will be subject to annual review by
Community Development Department staff. Any
complaints by surrounding land owners will be
investigated by staff and the exception will be
scheduled for a public hearing at the next available
Commission meeting for review. Smoking
operations should be limited to days when the
smoke will rise over adjacent structures whenever
feasible and prudent. If the operation is successful,
an alternate site for expanding the commercial
smoking operation should be investigated where
the use will not be located near other structures or
unrelated land uses.
The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll
call vote.
KIBS227642
P & Z Minutes: April 15, 1992 Page 11 of 15
E) Case S92-009. Request for preliminary approval of the
vacation of Lots 1C and 1D, Block 5, Bells Flats Alaska
Subdivision, including the vacation of a 20' wide utility
easement, and replat to Lots 1C-1 and 1D-1, Block 5, Bells Flats
Alaska Subdivision. 10964 and 10906 Middle Bay Drive.
LINDA FREED indicated 23 public hearing notices were mailed
for this case and none were returned. Staff recommended
approval of this request, subject to conditions.
Regular Session Closed.
Public Hearing Opened:
Stan Ness appeared before the Commission and expressed
support for this request.
Public Hearing Closed.
Regular Session Opened.
COMMISSIONER HODGINS MOVED TO GRANT preliminary
approval of the vacation of Lots 1C and 1D, Block 5, Bells Flats
Alaska Subdivision, including the vacation of a 20' wide utility
easement, and replat to Lots 1C-1 and 1D-1, Block 5, Bells Flats
Alaska Subdivision; subject to the conditions of approval
contained in the staff report dated April 7, 1992; and to adopt
the findings contained in the staff report dated April 7, 1992, as
"Findings of Fact" for this case.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. The surveyor will insure the final location of the replatted
lot line will be located such that the toe of fill for the
accessory building on Lot 1C-1 will be located entirely on
Lot 1C-1.
2. The vacation of a platted utility easement must be
approved by the Kodiak Island Borough Assembly, per
Section 16.60.060 A (Additional Approval Required) of
the Borough Code as follows:
16.60.060 Additional Approval Required
A. A decision to grant a vacation is not effective
unless approved by the City Council if the vacated
area is within a city, or by the Assembly if the
vacated area is within the Borough, outside a city.
The Council or Assembly shall have thirty (30)
days from the receipt of the decision to veto the
vacation. If the vacation is not vetoed within the
thirty (30) day period, the consent of the Council or
Assembly shall be considered to have been given to
the vacation.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. This plat meets the minimum standards of survey
accuracy and proper preparation of plats required in Title
16 of the Borough Code.
KIBS227643
P & Z Minutes: April 15, 1992 Page 12 of 15
2. This plat meets all the requirements of Title 17 of the
Borough Code.
3. This plat is generally consistent with adopted Borough
plans and provides a subdivision of land that supports
those plans.
4. The vacation of the utility easement, as indicated on the
preliminary plat dated February 21, 1992, will not
adversely affect the municipality, service district or
utility companies in their ability to provide services to
the public in this area.
The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll
call vote.
F) Proposed changes to Chapter 17.57 (Off-street Parking) of the
Borough Code, amending Section 17.57.020, 17.57.030 and
17.57.080 I (Handicapped accessible parking) to include
provisions similar to those contained in the Americans with
Disabilities Act; and
Proposed changes to Sections 17.57.070 F. and 17.57.080
requiring corner clearance for driveway access.
LINDA FREED indicated no (0) public hearing notices were
mailed for this case, as it is a proposed zoning code change and
was advertised borough -wide.
Regular Session Closed.
Public Hearing Opened:
Seeing and hearing none.
Public Hearing Closed.
Regular Session Opened.
COMMISSIONER MATZELL MOVED TO FORWARD proposed
amendments to Chapter 17.57 (Off-street Parking) of the
Borough Code, amending Sections 17.57.020, 17.57.030 and
17.57.080.I. (Handicapped accessible parking) to include
provisions similar to those contained in the Americans with
Disabilities Act, to the Borough Assembly with a
recommendation for approval.
The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll
call vote.
COMMISSIONER MATZELL MOVED TO FORWARD proposed
amendments to Sections 17.57.070.F. (Parking Area
Development Standards --Single-family and two-family
dwellings) and 17.57.080.F.3 (Parking Area Development
Standards --Multifamily dwellings and non-residential uses),
regarding corner clearance standards for driveway access, to
the Borough Assembly with a recommendation for approval.
The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll
call vote.
KIBS227644
P & Z Minutes: April 15, 1992 - - - Page 13 of 15
"i i]0 73431a-**i
There was no old business.
VIII. NEW BUSINESS
A) Case 92-008. Review by the Planning and Zoning
Commission of a land disposal for fair market value, in
accordance with Section 18.20.030 A (Review by Commission --
Assembly Approval), of one 579 square foot portion and one
890 square foot portion of the Main Elementary School site to
be used as part of the Mill Bay Road reconstruction project.
Portions of Tract C, U.S. Survey 2538B (generally located at the
corner of Powell Avenue and Mill Bay Road, 128 Powell
Avenue).
COMMISSIONER HODGINS MOVED TO ADOPT the following
resolution containing a recommendation to the Borough
Assembly regarding the land disposal reviewed by the
Commission in regard to Case 92-008.
Now Therefore, be it resolved by the Kodiak Island
Borough Planning and Zoning Commission,
That, the disposal for fair market value of two (2)
portions of Tract C, U.S. Survey 2538B, one (1)
579 square foot portion and one (1) 890 square
foot portion, of the site commonly known as that
of Main Elementary School, is hereby
recommended for approval by the Kodiak Island
Borough Assembly as part of the Mill Bay Road
reconstruction project, subject to a condition of
approval to repLat the proposed conveyances
within one year of the transfer of ownership.
The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll
call vote.
There was no further new business.
IX. COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSIONER HODGINS MOVED TO ACKNOWLEDGE
RECEIPT of items A and B of communications. The motion was
seconded and CARRIED by unanimous voice vote.
There were no further communications.
X. REPORTS
COMMISSIONER HODGINS MOVED TO ACKNOWLEDGE
RECEIPT of items A and B of reports. The motion was seconded and
CARRIED by unanimous voice vote.
A) Community Development Department Status Report.
B) Community Development Department Plat Activity Report.
KIBS227645
P & Z Minutes: April 15, 1992 Page 14 of 15
COMMISSIONER HODGINS MOVED TO RECONSIDER Findings of
Fact for Case 92-003.
The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous voice vote.
COMMISSIONER HODGINS MOVED TO POSTPONE Findings of
Fact for Case 92-003 until the May, 1992 regular meeting.
The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous voice vote.
There were no further reports.
XI. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
There were no audience comments.
XII. COMMISSIONERS' COMMENTS
XIII. ADJOURNMENT
CHAIR HENDEL adjourned the meeting at 9:34.
KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
ATTEST
By: �& ��t� — piu�� r/yc ,
Eileen Probasco, Secretary
Community Development Department
DATE APPROVED: May 20, 1992
IA, ffi. ..
KIBS227646
P & Z Minutes: April 15, 1992 Page 15 of 15