1986-11-19 Regular Meetingr--
r
r
I
KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING - NOVEMBER 19, 1986
CALL TO ORDER
The Regular Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission was called
to order at 7:30 p.m, by Chairman Steve Rennell on November 19, 1986
in the Borough Assembly Chambers.
II. ROLL CALL
Commissioners Present:
Steve Rennell, Chairman
Robin Heinrichs
Marlin Knight
Mary Lou Knudsen
D.L. Smedley
Scott Thompson
Commissioners Absent:
Mike Anderson, Excused
A quorum was established.
III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Others Present:
Linda Freed, Director,
Community Development Department
Bob Pederson, Associate Planner,
Community Development Department
Patricia Miley, Secretary,
Community Development Department
Staff reported the following additions to the agenda:
VIII NEW BUSINESS
A) Memo from the Community Development Department, dated November
19, 1986, re: Investigation of a drainage plan for the Selief
Lane area.
IX COMMUNICATIONS
E) Copy of a letter from Rowe D. Redick, Alaska Department of
Transportation and Public Facilities, to Dave Crowe, dated
November 5, 1986, re: Line of sight at Bay View Drive/Rezanof
Drive East intersection; and a copy of the letter of response,
Dave Crowe to Rowe D. Redick, dated November 13, 1986.
COMMISSIONER HEINRICHS MOVED TO ACCEPT the agenda with the above
additions. The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous voice
vote.
IV. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
COMMISSIONER KNUDSEN MOVED TO ACCEPT the minutes of the Planning and
Zoning Commission regular meeting of October 15, 1986 as presented.
The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous voice vote.
V. APPEARANCE REQUESTS AND AUDIENCE COMMENTS
A) Request for Planning and Zoning Commission review of an
administrative determination that the Kodiak Island Borough will
not pursue enforcement or request removal of a third dwelling
unit in a structure located on a lot zoned R2--Two-Family
Residential. Lot 8, Block 32, East Addition; 1014 Rezanof Drive
East. (Lola Harvey)
A discussion ensued amongst the Commissioners and Community
Development Department staff.
COMMISSIONER HEINRICHS MOVED TO CONCUR WITH the administrative
determination that the Kodiak Island Borough will not seek
P & Z MINUTES KIBS226098 1
NOVEMBER 19, 1986
removal of or pursue enforcement action against the third
dwelling unit in the structure located on a lot that is zoned
R2--Two-Family Residential and to adopt the four findings of fact
as outlined in the staff report. Lot 8, Block 32, East Addition.
The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll call vote.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The property owner obtained a building permit and expended
considerable funds, in reliance on the permit, to convert
the structure into a triplex.
2. The property owner has been assessed as and paid utility
charges on a triplex since 1982.
3. There is adequate parking onsite for the three units.
4. No substantial public purpose would be served in enforcement
action against this property.
B) Request for Planning and Zoning Commission review of a previously
approved variance that permitted ten (10) zero -lot -line or
"townhouse" dwelling units to have the common -wall side yard
setback abated on both side property lines instead of only one
side property line. The applicant requests the option of
constructing the units with only one side yard setback abated,
thereby creating detached zero -lot -line units on Lots 2A through
10A with the unit on Lot 11A being a free standing unit. Lots 2A
through 11A, Block 2, Alderwood Subdivision; 1314 through 1325
Mylark Lane. (Kodiak Properties, Inc.)
COMMISSIONER KNUDSEN MOVED TO GRANT A request for optional design
of eight (8) zero -lot -line structures that will have one side
r yard setback abated and be constructed in a "detached
zero -lot -line" concept and to adopt the findings outlined in the
staff report dated November 10, 1986 as findings of fact for this
case. Lots 2A through 9A, Block 2, Alderwood Subdivision. The
motion was seconded.
A discussion ensued amongst the Commissioners, Community
Development Department staff and Toby Cook.
The question was called and the motion CARRIED by unanimous roll
call vote.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The optional detached zero -lot -line development concept is
in keeping with the intent of the original variance granted
to the applicant by the Commission on September 18, 1985.
2. There will be no change in use or density of development
resulting from the optional development form.
COMMISSIONER KNUDSEN MOVED TO GRANT A request for optional
construction of two (2) zero -lot -line structures that will have
one side yard setback abated and be constructed in a "detached
zero -lot -line" concept. Lots 10A and 11A, Block 2, Alderwood
r Subdivision. The motion was seconded and FAILED by unanimous
roll call vote. Commissioners Smedley, Knight, Thompson,
Heinrichs, Knudsen and Rennell voted "no."
COMMISSIONER KNUDSEN MOVED TO ADOPT the findings of fact
contained in the staff report dated November 10, 1986. The
motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll call vote.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The proposed design for Lot 11A will not meet the intent of
Chapter 17.34 of the Borough Code, nor the intent of the
original variance granted to the applicant, because it will
P & Z MINUTES KIBS226099 2 NOVEMBER 19, 1986
result in a detached single-family residence locating on a
lot (Lot 11A) that fails to meet the 7,200 square foot
minimum lot size for the R2--Two-Family Residential Zoning
District.
A discussion ensued amongst the Commissioners.
C) CASE 5-85-023. Request for an extension of the preliminary
subdivision approval period to June 17, 1987: subdivision of Lot
1, Block 1, Bells Flats Alaska Subdivision to Lots lA through 1E.
(Margaret Pryor/Norman and Dorothy Holm)
COMMISSIONER KNUDSEN MOVED TO GRANT AN EXTENSION of the
preliminary subdivision approval period to June 17, 1987:
subdivision of Lot 1, Block 1, Bells Flats Alaska Subdivision to
Lots 1A through 1E. The motion was seconded and CARRIED by
unanimous roll call vote.
D) CASE S-85-047. Request for an extension of the preliminary
subdivision approval period to October 21, 1987: subdivision of
Tract D, Russian Creek Alaska Subdivision to Tracts D-1, D-2, D-3
and D-4. (Cy F. Hoen)
COMMISSIONER KNUDSEN MOVED TO GRANT AN EXTENSION of the
preliminary subdivision approval period to October 21, 1987:
subdivision of Tract D, Russian Creek Alaska Subdivision to
Tracts D-1, D-2, D-3 and D-4. The motion was seconded and
CARRIED by unanimous roll call vote.
There were no further appearance requests or audience comments.
VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A) CASE 86-078. Request for a variance from Section 17.54.010 (A)
and (C) (Height -Extension onto Public Property) of the Borough
Code to permit a 4.7 foot fence to project into the Larch Street
right-of-way in a R2--Two-Family Residential Zoning District.
Lot 9, Block 1, Russell Estates Subdivision; 1517 Larch Street.
(David A. Colwell)
BOB PEDERSON indicated 31 public hearing notices were mailed for
this case and none were returned. Staff recommended approval of
this request subject to the four conditions outlined in the staff
report.
Regular Session Closed.
Public Hearing Opened:
Seeing and hearing none.
Public Hearing Closed.
Regular Session Opened.
COMMISSIONER KNIGHT MOVED TO GRANT A request for a variance from
Section 17.54.O1O(A) and (C) of the Borough Code to permit a 4.7
foot fence to project into the Larch Street right-of-way and
retain a height of 4.7 feet in a R1--Single-Family Residential
Zoning District, subject to the conditions of approval outlined
r in the staff report dated November 4, 1986 and to adopt the
findings contained in the staff report as "Findings of Fact" for
this case. Lot 9, Block 1, Russell Estates. The motion was
seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll call vote.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. The fence is constructed at the applicant's sole expense.
2. The applicant assumes any liability associated with said
fence on City -owned property.
3. If at a future date the City determines that the fence must
be removed from the City -owned property, the applicant or
P & Z MINUTES KIBS226100 3 NOVEMBER 19, 1986
any subsequent owner of Lot 9, Block 1, Russell Estates,
agrees to remove same without cost to the City.
4. Since the land is publicly owned, no prescriptive right
accrues to the user.
1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable
to the property or intended use of development, which
generally do not apply to other properties in the same land
use district.
The exceptional condition applicable to the intended use of
the property is largely a perceptual one. Typically, the
average property owner assumes that all the land out to the
sidewalk or roadway edge is their "yard," and that they
should be able to erect a fence of any height around that
yard. In addition, if the fence was built along the
property lines, strips of City property would remain outside
the fence. It is possible that this property would not then
be maintained by the property owner.
2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in
practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships.
Strict application of the zoning ordinance would only allow
the fence to be placed on the property lines with a maximum
height of 4 feet in the front yard. This is an unnecessary
hardship when many other fences (above or below 4 feet) in
the community have encroached on the public property without
first receiving a variance. The Commission has also granted
variance in the past for fences to project into road
-of -way.
rrights
I
3. The granting of the variance will not result in material
j
damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor
be detrimental to the public's health. safetv and welfare.
A
Granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the
public's health, safety or welfare because the fence does
not pose a line of sight problem along Larch Street. Also,
the conditions outlined below ensure that any future removal
of the fence will not impose a cost to the public. The
erection of the fence out to the sidewalk will hopefully
ensure that the small strip of City property is maintained
by the property owner to the benefit of the City.
4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the
Granting of the variance will not be contrary to the
objectives of the Comprehensive Plan.
5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special
conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being
sought by the variance.
In this instance, actions of the applicant have caused the
conditions from which relief is being sought by a variance.
This is due to the fact that the fence was constructed prior
to the granting of the variance. However, staff believes
that the variance would have been requested prior to
construction if the applicant had understood that it was
necessary.
6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a
prohibited land use in the district involved.
Fences are permitted in all land use districts.
CASE 86-079. Request for the rezoning of Lots 2, 3A and 3B,
Block 2 and Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, Miller Point Alaska
P & Z MINUTES 4
KIBS226101
NOVEMBER 19, 1986
Subdivision from RR1--Rural Residential One to B--Business in
accordance with Chapter 17.72 (Amendments and Changes) of the
Borough Code. Located at 4217 Otmeloi Way; 4673, 4785 and 4865
Rezanof Drive East; and 4462 Monashka Bay Road. (Lowenberg,
Majdic and Red Samm, Inc.)
BOB PEDERSON indicated 43 public hearing notices were mailed for
this case and 3 were returned, opposing this request. Staff
recommended approval of a portion of this request and denial of a
portion of this request.
Regular Session Closed.
Public Hearing Opened:
JULIUS MAJDIC appeared before the Commission and expressed
support for the rezoning of Lots 3A and 3B, Block 2, Miller Point
Alaska Subdivision.
A discussion ensued amongst the Commissioners and Mr. Majdic.
Public Hearing Closed.
Regular Session Opened.
COMMISSIONER HEINRICHS MOVED TO RECOMMEND THAT the Kodiak Island
Borough Assembly approve the rezoning of Lot 3B, Block 2 and Lots
1 and 2, Block 3, Miller Point Alaska Subdivision from RR1--Rural
Residential One to B--Business in accordance with Chapter 17.72
of the Borough Code and to adopt the findings contained in the
staff report as "Findings of Fact" for this case. The motion was
seconded and CARRIED by majority roll call vote. Commissioners
Knight and Rennell voted "no."
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Findings as to the Need and Justification for a Change or
Amendment.
A rezone to business is justified because given the land
characteristics, permitted business uses should be
compatible with existing and permitted land uses on
surrounding properties, be suitable for the land in
question, and bring two lots into conformance with the
zoning ordinance. The three lots in question also have
adequate access and a safe line of sight. A rezone to
business is also needed because the lots are generally not
suitable for low density residential land use and are
currently used for nonconforming commercial land use
activities. Lastly, public water and sewer currently serve
the lots or can be extended from the Rezanof/Otmeloi
intersection.
2. Findings as to the Effect a Change or
m
A rezone to business will have no effect on the objectives
of the Comprehensive Plan because the plan is essentially
out-of-date for this area. The plan envisioned a large
amount of medium -density residential development in the
vicinity of the rezone area but only provided for business
development in downtown Kodiak and along Mill Bay Road.
C) CASE 86-080. Request for an exception pursuant to Section
17.03.060 (Building Permits) of the Borough Code to permit
grading (rock extraction) in a C--Conservation Zoning District in
order to realign and lengthen the existing rifle range located on
Tract A, Alaska Division of Lands Survey 36049, commonly known as
the V.F.W. site; located off Monashka Bay Road, approximately one
mile past the Timberline Sawmill. (Kodiak Island Sportsman's
Association/V.F.W./Kodiak Island Borough)
BOB PEDERSON indicated 26 public hearing notices were mailed for
this case and none were returned. Staff reported that the
applicants requested that this case be tabled until the December
17, 1986 regular meeting.
P & Z MINUTES KIBS226102 5 NOVEMBER 19, 1986
Regular Session Closed.
Public Hearing Opened:
Seeing and hearing none.
Public Hearing Closed.
Regular Session Opened.
COMMISSIONER HEINRICHS MOVED TO TABLE Case 86-080 until the
r December 17, 1986 regular meeting for another public hearing.
I The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous voice vote.
D) CASE 86-081. An appeal of an administrative decision in
accordance with Section 17.68.020(B) (Appeals from Administrative
Decisions) of the Borough Code of a decision ordering the
discontinuation of an unlawful use of land (outdoor storage in a
R2--Two-Family Residential Zoning District) and removal of all
outdoor storage within thirty (30) days. The appellant is
seeking relief in the form of an exception from Section 17.19.020
(Permitted Uses) of the Borough Code to permit outdoor storage in
the R2--Two-Family Residential Zoning District; and a
Request for a variance from Section 17.54.010(A)
(Height -Extension onto Public Property) of the Borough Code to
permit a 6 foot fence to locate in a front yard in a
R2--Two-Family Residential Zoning District (along Rezanof Drive
East) on Tract C-1, U.S. Survey 1682; 3472 Rezanof Drive East.
(Michael W. Anderson)
BOB PEDERSON indicated 60 public hearing notices were mailed for
this case and 2 were returned, in favor of this request. Staff
reported that the applicant requested that this case be tabled
until the December 17, 1986 regular meeting.
Regular Session Closed.
Public Hearing Opened:
JIM FAVERO appeared before the Commission and expressed
opposition to this request.
A discussion ensued amongst the Commissioners and Mr. Favero,
with input from the Community Development Department staff.
Public Hearing Closed.
Regular Session Opened.
COMMISSIONER HEINRICHS MOVED TO TABLE Case 86-081 until the
December 17, 1986 regular meeting for another public hearing.
The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous voice vote.
E) CASE 86-083. Request for a conditional use permit in accordance
with Section 17.13.030 (Conditional Uses) of the Borough Code to
permit four (4) sanitary landfill sites to locate in the
C--Conservation Zoning District at the locations outlined below.
The landfills will contain materials from former military
installations that are being demolished under a Department of
Defense Environmental Restoration program. Landfill sites are
located at Sitkinak Island, Sections 3, 6 and 17, Township 42
South, Range 31 West, Seward Meridian; Long Island, Sections 5, 7
and 12, Township 28 South, Range 18 West, Seward Meridian; Miller
Field (Chiniak Dump), Section 5, Township 30 South, Range 19
West, Seward Meridian; and off Anton Larsen Road just past the
golf course, Section 6, Township 28 South, Range 20 West, Seward
Meridian. (United States Army Corps of Engineers/Underwater
Construction, Inc.)
BOB PEDERSON indicated 9 public hearing notices were mailed for
this case and 1 was returned by the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG),
opposing a portion of this request. Staff recommended approval
of this request.
KIBS226103
P & Z MINUTES 6 NOVEMBER 19, 198b
om—
e-
r.-
Regular Session Closed.
Public Hearing Opened:
KATHRYN MCNALLY, an attorney for the USCG, appeared before the
Commission and expressed opposition to the portion of this
request that is located on property owned by the USCG.
A discussion ensued amongst the Commissioners, LT. McNally and
Community Development Department staff.
GERRY NORTH, Corps of Engineers, appeared before the Commission
and withdrew that portion of the request that is located on
property owned by the USCG.
A discussion ensued amongst the Commissioners, Mr. North and
Community Development Department staff.
Public Hearing Closed.
Regular Session Opened.
COMMISSIONER MOVED TO GRANT A request for a conditional use
permit in accordance with Section 17.13.030 of the Borough Code
to permit three (3) sanitary landfill sites to locate in the
Conservation Zoning District and to adopt the findings contained
in the staff report as "Findings of Fact" for this case. The
three sites are located at:
Sitkinak Island, Sections 3, 6 and 17, Township 42 South, Range
31 West, Seward Meridian;
Long Island, Sections 5, 7 and 12, Township 28 South, Range 18
West, Seward Meridian; and
Miller Field (Chiniak Dump), Section 5, Township 30 South, Range
19 West, Seward Meridian.
The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous roll call vote.
A discussion ensued amongst the Commissioners, Community
Development Department staff and Don Neet, Underwater
Construction Company, regarding the Long Island dumpsite.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That the conditional use will preserve the value, spirit,
character and integrity of the surrounding area.
It appears that the proposed use will preserve the value,
spirit, character and integrity of the surrounding areas.
The cleanup of the debris, buildings, vehicles and other
miscellaneous junk will result in the removal of hazardous
materials off island, the elimination of unsightly,
dilapidated and vandalized structures, the elimination of
attractive nuisances, the preservation of historic
structures, and generally leave the land in a condition that
will allow for future development. All landfill sites are
at least one mile from any residential uses, thereby
eliminating potential land use conflicts.
2. That the conditional use fulfills all other reauirements of
this chapter pertaining to the conditional use in question.
The proposed use will fulfill all other requirements of the
C--Conservation Zoning District such as minimum lot size.
This occurs since the landfills will be located on large
tracts of unsubdivided land that is in common ownership.
3. That granting the conditional use permit will not be harmful
to the public health, safety, convenience and comfort.
The proposed use will enhance rather than endanger the
public's health, safety, convenience and comfort. As
identified in number 1, any hazardous materials will be
P & Z MINUTES
KIBS226104
7
NOVEMBER 19, 1986
removed from the Kodiak Island Borough, dilapidated and
possibly dangerous buildings will be eliminated and each
landfill site will meet Alaska Department of Environmental
Conservation (ADEC) regulations for sanitary landfills.
4. That sufficient setbacks, lot area, buffers or other
safeguards are being provided to meet the conditions
in subsections A through C of this section.
�. The proposed landfill areas are remote or located a good
distance away from any nearby uses. Additional safeguards
are being provided through provisions of the cleanup
contract and ADEC regulations. These safeguards should be
sufficient for this case.
VII. OLD BUSINESS
A) Administrative interpretation and definition of "Bed and
Breakfasts" as a home occupation
COMMISSIONER SMEDLEY discussed his objections to the
administrative interpretation and definition of "Bed and
Breakfasts" as a home occupation, as written, with the other
Commissioners.
COMMISSIONER SMEDLEY MOVED TO AMEND THE administrative
interpretation and definition of "Bed and Breakfasts" as a home
occupation to read, "a maximum of two adults and two children, 3
through 18 years of age, may occupy one room." The motion was
seconded and FAILED by majority roll call vote. Commissioners
Thompson, Heinrichs, Knudsen and Rennell voted "no."
There was no further old business.
VIII. NEW BUSINESS
A) Memo from the Community Development Department, dated November
19, 1986, re: Investigation of a drainage plan for the Selief
Lane area.
LINDA FREED explained this matter to the Commission. A
discussion ensued amongst the Commissioners and Ms. Freed.
COMMISSIONER HEINRICHS MOVED TO RECOMMEND that the Kodiak Island
Borough Assembly and the Kodiak City Council appoint an ad hoc
planning committee to prepare a 'drainage plan' for the Selief
Lane area. At a minimum the plan should include the drainage
from the Lower Reservoir, Horseshoe Lake, and the ditch along
Selief Lane. It is further recommended that the following
interests, at a minimum, be represented on the ad hoc committee:
property owners; a City Council representative; a Borough
Assembly representative, a Planning and Zoning Commission
representative; City staff (engineering), Borough staff (resource
manager), Ducks Unlimited; ADF&G; and the Corps of Engineers.
The Committee should produce a "product" in the form of a
recommended drainage plan, that can be agreed to by all the
interested parties, that will further the purposes of the plan:
i 1, to improve the drainage and reduce water problems of the
property owners along Selief Lane;
2, to improve the habitat and aesthetic value of the drainage
for the benefit of the local neighborhood and the general
community; and
3. to investigate how the drainage plan could tie into Borough
development of parks and trails.
The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous voice vote.
There was no further new business.
KIBS226105
P & Z MINUTES 8 NOVEMBER 19, 1986
r
IX. COMMUNICATIONS
LINDA FREED reviewed the items of Communication. A discussion ensued
amongst the Commissioners and Community Development Department staff.
COMMISSIONER KNUDSEN MOVED TO ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT of items A through E
under Communications. The motion was seconded and CARRIED by
unanimous voice vote.
A) Copy of a letter to Mark White from Gordon Gould, Zoning Officer,
dated October 15, 1986, re: Lot 3, Block 4, Mountain View Second
Addition.
B) Copy of a letter to the Planning and Zoning Commission from
Richard Juelson, dated October 21, 1986, re: Appeal under Section
17.68.020(B). Copy of a letter to Richard Juelson from Gordon
Gould, Zoning Officer, dated October 30, 1986, re: Lot 13C,
U.S.S. 3100, Compliance Plan.
C) Copy of a public notice from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
dated November 1, 1986, re: Identification No. SPN 86-5. The
notice serves to clarify policy by which the Corps implements its
responsibilities under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act in
relation to the construction of access road and subdivision
developments involving waters of the United States, including
wetlands.
D) Minutes of the following Chiniak Community Forum meetings:
Comprehensive Plan Worksession - September 23, 1986
Board of Directors Special Meeting - September 13, 1986
Comprehensive Plan Worksession - August 12, 1986
Board of Directors Special Meeting - August 12, 1986
Partial Chiniak Community Questionnaire Results
E) Copy of a letter from Rowe D. Redick, Alaska Department of
Transportation and Public Facilities, to Dave Crowe, dated
November 5, 1986, re: Line of sight at Bay View Drive/Rezanof
Drive East intersection; and a copy of the letter of response,
Dave Crowe to Rowe D. Redick, dated November 13, 1986.
There were no further communications.
X. REPORTS
COMMISSIONER KNUDSEN MOVED TO ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF THE STATUS
REPORT. The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous voice vote.
A) Status Report from the Community Development Department.
XI. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
There were no audience comments.
XII. COMMISSIONERS' COMMENTS
KIBS226106
P & Z MINUTES 9 NOVEMBER 19, 1986
Y
r--
XIII. ADJOURNMENT
CHAIRMAN RENNELL adjourned the meeting at 9:11 p.m.
KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
By:-��
teve Rennell, Chairman
ATTEST
By: I """"" / '�
Patricia Mil , Secretary
Community Development Department
DATE APPROVED: "��A tY m [-�, lge('o
A TAPE RECORDING IS ON FILE AT THE KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
KIBS226107
I K-WAR' IRS004.1
10 NOVEMBER 19, 1986