1981-11-12 Regular MeetingYW4 - - "UVU'llucl 142 1.Yol
Chairman Wayne Coleman called the Architectural Review Board to order on
Thursday, November 12, 1981 at 7:30 p.m. in order to begin review of the
Requests for Proposals submitted in conjunction with the Island Lake Water
and Sewer project. The following persons were in attendance:
Phil Shealy Ronald M. Chase Art Bors
Wayne Coleman Dave Crowe Scott Arndt
Bill Beaty RarryLEhick6#ng Ed Kozak
The group reviewed the following fourteen proposals which had been submitted
in response to the RFP Engineering Services for Water/Sewer System Improvements
in the Service District No. I [Island Lake -Mill Bay -Spruce Cape) dated
September 10, 1981:
1. Bell, Herring & Associates (JV with Collins $ Ryder)
2. CH2M Hill
3. Chugach Engineers and Constructors (JV with BE$C)
4. ESCA-Tech Engineering (JV with Moore, Wallace 6 Kenndy)
S. International Engineering Co., Inc. (Parent Firm of R.W.Rdtherford €, Assoc
•6. Kramer, Chin F, Mayo
7. Linck-Thompson: JV of AA+E and Straam Engineers
8. Little Susitna Company (JV with Armstrong & Associates)
9. PRC Consoeur Townsend
10. Quadra Engineering, Inc. (Formerly Gordon Sheret $ Associates)
11. Tans -Alaska Engineering (JV with Howard Grey $ Assoc. $ Silvers Engrg.)
12. URS Company
13. USKH
14. Veco, Inc. (JV with Arctic Engineers, Inc.)
In further discussion it was agreed to drop the following six firms from further
consideration in that they had not actually visited Kodiak and/or did not have
the qualifications the group were looking for:
1. Chugach Engineers 4 Constructors, Inc.
2. ESCA-Tech Engineering
3. Linck-Thompson
4. The Little Susitna Company
5. Quadra Engineering, Inc.
6. Trans -Alaska Engineering
The group then agreed to review the material which had been distributed at the
meeting on their own time and to continue the meeting on the Island Lake project
on Friday, November 20th.
In Other Business the Architectural Review Board reviewed CTA's letter of
October 27th -the three types of pool coverings suggested by the architectural
firm. The Architectural Review Board noted that they not care for the overhead
proposal and after further discussion the consensus of the group was that the
deck location appeared most suitable for our needs and requested that CTA so be
advised.
The Architectural Review Board then reviewed the letter from CTA dated October
30th and after considerable discussion reaffirmed their desire for CTA to
continue to investigate the usage of high pressure sodium lighting in other
interior situations and particularly in pool applications and to suggest the
Architectural Review Board - Minutes - November 12, 1981
rage 2
names of :any pool installations known.
Chairman --Coleman then called the next meeting for Friday, November 20, 1981
at 7:30 p.m. -in the Conference Room and requested the staff to make reference
calls in regards to firms still under consideration for the Island Lake project.
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Wayne Coleman, Chairman
Architectural Review Board