1998-02-26 Work Session ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
Work Session Notes
February 26, 1998
I. CALL TO ORDER
Gerry Cloudy,Chairman called the session to order at 6:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Kodiak Island Borough School
District Conference Room.
TI. ROLL CALL
Members Present Members Absent Staff Present
Gera'Cloudy Jeff LeDoux Kaye McClain
Greg Hacker Dale Soughers(out of town) Chris Lynch-(Mayor Rep,)
Bob Tucker-(School Supt. Rep.) .lack McFarland-(School Board Rep.)
Robin Heinrichs-(Assembly Rep.) Tom Templeton
Jay Johnston
The meeting was also attended by Terry fiver,ECl/Hyer,Inc.,Architects for Peterson School.
III. MINUTES
Draft minutes of the meeting of January 26, 1998 were used as a discussion guideline_
IV. DISCUSSION OF 100% DRAWINGS FOR PETERSON SCHOOL ADDITION
Mr. Cloudy explained to Mr. Hoer that after reading the response to the Boar'd's comments on the 65%drawings,it was felt that
the Intent of the comments on the Penthouse floor was not fully explained, The Board was concerned that a spill in the
Penthouse might cause interior ceiling damage and they wished a drain or some arrangement to prevent damage to the area
below, Mr. Flyer felt a roof drain would not be the best solution and will look for a system,which can be sealed, and any spills
can be"cleaned"from the surface of the floor.
Mr. Cloudy requested the Board's appreciation be expressed to Dick Armstrong,Engineer for his prompt attention to
a problem with the Peterson pumps. They are pulling water from the boilers rather than pushing it. A permanent fix for the
problem will be incorporated into this project. The problem has been longstanding.
The in-line water filters had been questioned at the previous meeting. Since the water at Peterson is different from the
noun,the Board wanted to make sure that the spec'd tiller would do the job. Ten-inch polymer filters that are washable and
reusable were suggested.
Access panels were dismissed, The Board clarified the panels should be located within easy working distance of the
equipment to be accessed.
Concrete foundation may still exist in the area of the utilidor on drawing C1.0. Dirt may have been used to fill in the
area that was abandoned. Also the references to the phone numbers for"digging"do not apply to this project,nor does it detail
how to connect to the existing storm drain. Mr. Tucker spoke to the toilet accessories in the drawings on A8.2,noting the
school district standard does not call for some of the detailed items.
Discussion turned to Drawing A6.1 —Wall Section 113,that shows a void between two walls. The Board was afraid
condensation might be a problem. 21A6.3 shows a similar situation. Mr.I-1ver felt a vapor banner should he added.
The emergency and exit lighting was discussed. The school district has provided the district standards for items.
Please verify the correct fixtures are speed. A3.I nailing pattern was discussed..
Ms. Lynch had a question about.the need and intent of an expansion joint for the asphalt called out on wall section I,
Drawing A6.2. It was determined a sealant should he added to the specifications. 5/AI0.1 shows the joint as well. It was
determined to leave that area as drawn,but change the rest to sealant joints.
Discussion moved on to the comments on the Specifications,centering on installing at least one lockable cabinet in
each classroom, as well as the wardrobe closet. AD@.0 requires all possibly"toxic"mixtures to be under lock and key. Best
locks,keyed the same as the wardrobe closets throughout the school are preferred. The under sink cabinets were suggested as
the best location.
Mr.Heinrichs had a few questions and comments about the Parapet Wall holding up to the 100 mile-a-hour winds that
we get occasionally. Is the wall attachment strong enough to withstand that kind of stress? Mr. I-Iyer noted 110 mile-a-hour arc
indicated on the plans. He will check on this considering the long level sweep a heavy wind could have against the Parapet.
The group talked about"the hallway to nowhere",an area planned in the last remodel to extend an addition from.
Comments were that there were several in-egularities in that area that a bidder should be aware of before placing a bid. Mr.
Flyer will investigate prior to the bidding. He noted they will be adding two windows to the cafeteria and they arc uncertain of
the wall structure in that area. Mr. Tucker will investigate the underlying structure as he will be there on Friday and report to
Mr. Hyer,
Mr. Heimichs noted two layers of sheet rock on detail 2/A6.1, ft was noted this was For the lire rating. Comments
went on to bring out protection of the roof structure and the use of hangers.
There will be a separate contract to relocate the fiber optic cable before the new construction begins.
V. NEXT MEETING
Next meeting will be at a time and place to be announced.
VI. ADJOURNMENT
The session adjourned at 7:05 p.m.
Approved by: Submitted By:
f 41IeC'. ,L 3 '3M
Gerry Cloudy, Date Kaye R. McClain, I ate
Chairperson rojects Assistant