Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
FY2018-03 Karluk School Site Characterization Work Plan with Travis/Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. - Including Change Orders
From: Patricia Valerio To: Irene Arellano Cc: Nova Javier Subject: RE: Project Completion Dates Date: Thursday, January 25, 2024 1:54:05 PM Hi Irene, Contract FY2020-35 is complete. The work for this contract was completed on 7.14.2021. Contract FY2020-16 is complete. The work for this contract was completed on 6.11.2020. Contract FY2018-03 is complete. The work for this contract was completed on 5.11.2021 m From: Irene Arellano <iarellano@kodiakak.us> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2024 11:56 AM To: Patricia Valerio <pvalerio@kodiakak.us> Subject: FW: Project Completion Date Hi Patricia, Please check FY2020-16 if has been complete so we can apply retention dates on the contract. Thank you, Irene From: Irene Arellano Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2024 11:35 AM To: Patricia Valerio <avalerioC@kodiakak.us> Subject: Project Completion Date Hi Patricia, This contract is missing agreement date. FY2020-35 Jensen Yorba Lott Engineering Concept 35% design and consulting services for Leachate Treatment Plant Operations Inquiring if this project has been complete so we can apply retention dates on the contract. Thank you, Irene ContractFY2018-03 Professional Services Agreement with Travis/Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. for Environmental Consulting Services for Karluk School This AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 271h day of June 2017 by and between the KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH, organized under the laws of the State of Alaska, hereinafter referred to as the "Borough", and Travis/Peterson Environmental Consulting, [tic., a corporation authorized to do business in Alaska, with offices located at 3305 Arctic Blvd., Suite 102, Anchorage AK 99503, hereinafter referred to as the "Contractor'. WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the Borough wishes to enter into a contract with an independent contractor to provide environmental consulting services for the Karluk School Site Characterization; and WHEREAS, Travis/Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. submitted a proposal asserting it is qualified to perform these services and able to do so in a timely manner; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1.0 DEFINITIONS 1.1 "Agreement' shall mean this Professional Services Agreement, including: Exhibit A - Travis/Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. proposal dated June 24, 2017. Exhibit B -- Karluk School Site Characterization Work Plan dated January 2017. 1 2 "Change Order' is an addition to, or reduction of, or other revision approved by the Borough in scope, complexity, character, or duration of the services or other provisions of this Agreement. 1.3 "Borough" shall mean the Kodiak Island Borough, Alaska. 1.4 "Contracting Officer' shall mean Borough Manager, and include any successor or authorized representatives. 1.5 "Contractor' shall mean Travis/Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. 1.6 "Project' shall mean the environmental consulting services for the Karluk Site Characterization. 2.0 TERM OF AGREEMENT. This Agreement shall take effect upon execution by both Borough and Contractor. This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect until the Page 1 of 8 Contract FY2018-03 Project has been completed and further, until all claims and disputes have been concluded. The work is considered complete when the Borough has received and found acceptable the finished product of all work described in 4.0 Scope of Services or changes thereto. This Agreement may be amended only in writing and upon compliance with all applicable statutes, ordinances, and regulations. 3.0 FEES. For environmental consulting services described in 4.0 Scope of Service, the Borough will compensate the Contractor an amount not to exceed Twenty One Thousand Three Hundred Ninety Dollars and Zero Cents ($21,390.00), charged on a time and materials basis. 4.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES. The Borough and Contractor have agreed upon a scope of work to provide environmental consulting services as specifically described in Exhibit A, Travis/Peterson Environmental Consulting proposal, and Exhibit B, Karluk School Site Characterization Work Plan. This Scope of Services can only be changes in writing pursuant to Section 25.0 of this Agreement. 5.0 SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION. Reserved 6.0 PERSONNEL/ORGANIZATION. 6.1 Key Personnel. Work and services provided by the Contractor will be performed by: Michael D. Travis, P.E. Ryan Kingsbery 6.2 Chanties in Key Personnel. The Contractor shall give the Borough, through notice to the Contracting Officer, reasonable advance notice of any necessary substitution or change of key personnel and shall submit justification therefore in sufficient detail to permit the Borough to evaluate the impact of such substitution on this Agreement. No substitutions or other changes shall be made without the written consent of the Borough. 7.0 STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE. 7.1 The Contractor agrees to provide all required professional services to complete the project and any additions or changes thereto. The Contractor accepts the relationship of trust and confidence established between it and the Borough by this Agreement. The Contractor covenants with the Borough to furnish its best skill and judgement, and to further the interest of the Borough at all limes through efficient business administration and management. The Contractor shall provide all services in a competent manner. It is understood that some of the services to Page 2 of 8 Contract FY2018-03 be rendered hereunder required professional judgement and skill. In those cases, the Contractor agrees to adhere to the standards of the applicable profession. 7.3 Technical Accuracy. Borough shall not be responsible for discovering deficiencies in the technical accuracy of Contractor's services. Contractor shall correct deficiencies in technical accuracy with additional compensation unless such corrective action is directly attributable to deficiencies in Borough fumished information. 8.0 TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE. Time is of the essence in this Agreement. Contractor's failure to meet any such deadlines or required performance may adversely imperil other contractual obligations of the Borough. 9.0 COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. The Contractor shall be familiar with and at all times comply with and observe all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, and executive orders, all applicable safety orders, all orders or decrees of administrative agencies, courts or other legally constituted authorities having jurisdiction or authority over the Contractor, the Borough, or the services which may be in effect now or during the performance of the services. 10.0 INDEMNITY. The Contractor shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the Borough from and against any claim of, or liability for, negligent acts, errors, and omissions of the Contractor under this Agreement, including attorney fees and costs. The Contractor is not required to indemnify, defend, or hold harmless the Borough for a claim of, or liability for the Borough's independent negligent acts, errors, and omissions. If there is a claim of, or liability for, a joint negligent act, error, or omission of the Contractor and the Borough, the indemnification defense, and hold harmless obligation of the Contractor, and liability of the parties, shall be apportioned on a comparative fault basis. In this provision, "Contractor' and "Borough" include the employees, agents, and contractors who are directly responsible, respectively, to each. In this provision, "independent negligent acts, errors, and omissions of the Borough means negligence other than in the Borough's selection, administration, monitoring, or controlling of the Contractor, or in approving or accepting the Contractor's work. 11.0 INSURANCE. The Contractor understands that no Borough insurance coverage, including Worker's Compensation, is extended to the Contractor while completing the services described in this Agreement. The Contractor shall carry adequate (commercially reasonable coverage levels) insurance covering Worker's Compensation, general public liability, automobile, professional liability, and property damage, including a contractual liability endorsement covering the liability created or assumed under this Agreement. The Contractor shall not commence work under this Agreement until the Contractor provides the Borough with certificates of insurance evidencing that all required insurance Page 3 of 8 Contract FY2o18-03 has been obtained. These insurance policies and any extension or renewals thereof must contain the following provisions or endorsements: a. Borough is additional insured thereunder as respects liability arising out of or from the work performed by Contractor. b. Borough will be given thirty (30) days prior notice of cancellation or material alteration of any of the insurance policies specified in the certificate. C. Insurer waives all rights of subrogation against Borough and their employees or elected officials. d. The insurance coverage is primary to any comparable liability insurance carried by the Borough. Upon request, Contractor shall permit the Borough to examine any of the insurance policies specified herein. Any deductibles or exclusions in coverage will be assumed by the Contractor, for account of, and at the sole risk of the Contractor. 12.0 GOVERNING LAW. The laws of Alaska will determine the interpretation, performance, and enforcement of this Agreement. 13.0 OWNERSHIP OF WORK PRODUCTS. Payment to the Contractor for services hereunder include full compensation for all work products and other materials produced by the Contractor pertaining to this Agreement. The originals of all material prepared or developed by the Contractor or its employees, agents, or representatives hereunder, including documents, drawings, designs, calculations, maps, sketches, notes, reports, data, models, computer tapes, and samples shall become the property of the Borough when prepared, whether delivered or not, and shall, together with any materials furnished the Contractor and its employees, agents, or representatives by the Borough hereunder, be delivered to the Borough upon request and upon termination or completion of this Agreement. Materials previously created and copyrighted by the Contractor included in the Project will remain the property of the Contractor. Copies will be made available to the Borough upon request. Materials purchased from and copyrighted by third parties are not included in this provision. 14.0 PATENTS, TRADEMARKS, AND COPYRIGHTS. The Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the Borough harmless from and against any and all claims, costs, royalties, damages, and expenses of any kind of nature whatsoever (including attorneys' fees) which may arise out of or result from or be reasonably incurred in contesting any claim that the methods, processes, or acts employed by the Contractor or its employees in connection with the performance of services hereunder infringes or contributes to the infringement of any letter patent, trademark, or copyright. In case such methods, Page 4 of 8 Contract PY2018.03 processes, or acts are in suit held to constitute infringement and use is enjoined, the Contractor, within reasonable time and at its own expense, will either secure a suspension of the injunction by procuring for the Borough a license or otherwise, or replace such method, process, etc., with one of equal efficiency. 15.0 NONWAIVER. No failure of the Borough or Contractor to insist upon the strict performance by the other of any of the terms of this Agreement or to exercise any right or remedy herein conferred, shall constitute a waiver or relinquishment to any extent of its rights to rely upon such terms or rights on any future occasion. Each and every term, right, or remedy of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. 16.0 SAFETY/PERFORMANCE. The Contractor shall perform the work in a safe and workmanlike manner. The Contractor shall comply with all federal and state statutes, ordinances, orders, rules, and regulations pertaining to the protection of workers and the public from injury or damage, and shall take all other reasonable precautions to protect workers and the public from injury or damage. 17.0 SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION. 17.1 Fault Termination or Suspension. This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon ten (10) days written notice if the other party fails substantially to perform in accordance with its terms. If the Borough terminates this Agreement, it will pay die Contractor a sum equal to the percentage of work completed and accepted by the Borough that can be substantiated by the Contractor and the Borough, offset by any amounts owed to the Borough. However, within the ten (10) day Notice of Intent to terminate, the party in default shall be given an opportunity to present a plan to correct its failure. 17.2 Convenience Suspension or Termination. The Borough may at any time terminate or suspend this Agreement upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the Contractor, for any reason, including its own needs or convenience. In the event of a convenience termination or suspension for more than six (6) months, the Contractor will be compensated for authorized services and authorized expenditures performed to the date of receipt of written notice of termination or suspension. No fee or other compensation for the uncompleted portion of the services will be paid, except for already incurred indirect costs which the Contractor can establish and which would have been compensated but because of the termination or suspension would have to be absorbed by the Contractor without further compensation. 17.3 Activities Subsequent to Receipt of Notice of Termination or Suspension. Immediately upon receipt of a Notice of Termination or Suspension and, except as otherwise directed by the Contracting Officer, the Contractor shall: Page 5 of 8 ContractFY2018-03 a. stop work performed under this Agreement on the date and to the extent specified in the Notice; and b. deliver in the manner, at the times, and to the extent directed by the Contracting Officer, work in progress, completed work, supplies, and other material produced as a part of, or acquired in respect of, the performance of the work terminated or suspended by the Notice. 18.0 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY. The Contractor shall not discriminate against any employee because of race, religion, color, national origin, or because of age, physical handicap, sex, marital status, change in marital status, pregnancy, or parenthood when the reasonable demands of the position do not require distinction on the basis of age, physical handicap, sex, marital status, change in marital status, pregnancy, or parenthood. The Contractor shall take affirmative action required by law to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, religion, national origin, ancestry, age, or marital status. 19.0 NO ASSIGNMENT OR DELEGATION. The Contractor may not assign, subcontract, or delegate this Agreement, or any part of it, or any right to any of the money to be paid under it, without written consent of the Contracting Officer. 20.0 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The Contractor shall be an independent contractor in the performance of the work under this Agreement, and shall not be an employee or agent of the Borough. 21.0 PAYMENT OF TAXES. As a condition of performance of this Agreement, the Contractor shall pay all federal, state, and local taxes incurred by the Contractor and shall require their payment by any other persons in the performance of this Agreement. 22.0 PRECEDENCE AND DIVISIBILTY. The provisions of this Agreement shall fully govern the services performed by the Contractor. if any tern, condition, or provision of this Agreement is declared void or unenforceable, or limited in its application or effect, such event shall not affect any other provisions hereof and all other provisions shall remain fully enforceable. 23.0 ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire agreement between the parties as to the services to be rendered by the Contractor. All previous or concurrent agreements, representations, warranties, promises, and conditions relating to the subject matter of this Agreement are superseded by this Agreement. 24.0 CLAIMS AND DISPUTES. Venue for all claims and disputes under this Agreement, if not otherwise resolved by the parties, shall be in the appropriate Alaska state court in Anchorage or Kodiak, Alaska. Page 6 of 8 ContractFY2018-03 25.0 CHANGES IN SCOPE OF WORK. 25.1 General. No claim for additional services not specifically provided for in this Agreement will be allowed, nor may the Contractor do any work or furnish any materials not covered by the Agreement unless the work or material is ordered in writing by the Contracting Officer. Preparation of Change Orders and design changes, due to errors and/or omissions by the Contractor, will be done at the sole expense of the Contractor. 25.2 Chances in Scone of Work. The Borough or its representative may, at any time, by a written Change Order delivered to the Contractor, make changes to lite scope of work, or authorize additional work outside the scope of work. 25.3 Compensation to the Contractor. If any Change Order for which compensation is allowed under this Article causes an increase or decrease in the estimated cost of, or time required for, the performance of any part of the work under this Agreement, or if such change otherwise affects other provisions of this Agreement, an equitable adjustment will be negotiated. Such an adjustment may be: a. in the estimated cost or completion schedule, or both; b. in the amount of fee to be paid; and C. in such other provisions of the Agreement as may be affected, and the Agreement shall be modified accordingly. 35.4 Any claim by the Contractor for adjustment under this section must be asserted within fifteen (15) days from the day of receipt by the Contractor of the notification of change: provided, however, that the Contracting Officer, deciding that the facts justify such action, may receive and act upon any such claim asserted at any time prior to final payment under this Agreement. 26.0 LIMITATION OF FUNDS. 36.1 At no time will any provision of this Agreement make the Borough liable for payment for performance of work under this Agreement in excess of the amount that has been appropriated by the Borough Assembly obligated for expenditure for purposes of this Agreement. 36.2 Change orders issued pursuant to Section 25 of this Agreement shall not be considered an authorization to the Contractor to exceed the amount allotted in the absence of a statement in the change order, or other modification increasing the amount allotted. Page 7 of 8 ContractFYZOIS-03 26.3 Nothing in this Section shall affect the right of the Borough under Section 17 to terminate this Agreement. 27.0 PRIOR WORK. For the purposes of this Agreement, work done at the request of the Borough before execution of this Agreement if any, shall be deemed to be work done atter its execution and shall be subject to all the conditions contained herein. 28.0 NOTICES. Any notices, bills, invoices, or reports required by the Agreement shall be sufficient if sent by the parties by electronic mail or by United States mail, postage paid, to the addresses noted below: Kodiak Island Borough Tmvis/Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. Attn: Michael Powers Attn: Michael Travis 710 Mill Bay Rd. 3305 Arctic Blvd., Suite 102 Kodiak AK 99615 Anchorage AK 99503 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement. Kodiak Island Borough /B� By. Michael Powers Title: Borough Manager Date: ATTEST: *ova , MMC Borough Clerk Travis/Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. By: ' Title: Date: ' /.9 71 / I Page a of 8 Q/�,p►ND e0\ 0 SKpO��'�i Travis/Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. June 24, 2017 1322-06 Kodiak Island Borough 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, AK 99615 Exhibit A Michael D. Travis P.E. President 3305 Arctic Boulevard, Suite 102 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Phone: 907.5224337 Fax: 907-5224313 e-mail: mtmvis@lpeci.com Attention: Matt Gantlet Project Manager/Inspector Re: Proposal for the Karluk Site Characterization Dear Mr. Gandel: ContractFY2O18-03 Laurence A. Peterson Operations Manager 329 2nd Street Fairbanks, Alaska 99701 Phone: 907455-7225 Fax: 907455-7228 e-mail: larry@tpeci, com Thank you for requesting a proposal for Travis/Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. (TPECI) to conduct a site characterization of Kodiak Island Borough (KIB) property in the village of Karluk. The area of concern is located on the cast side of the Karluk school properly near decommissioned underground storage tanks. TPECI will use a small -diameter, gas -powered mobile drill rig to collect soil samples in accordance with the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation approved work plan. TPECI estimates the cost of our work will be $21,390. This cost assumes that the Kodiak Island Borough will contract directly with Denali Drilling and SGS Laboratories for their services. TPECI assumes 12 -hour work days and weather conditions will not restrict travel or disrupt working conditions. If weather affects the work schedule, TPECI will bill KIB for the additional costs endured. TPECI also assumes lodging (i.e. in the school) will be provided by the KIB and was not included in cost estimates. Please see the enclosed cost breakdown spreadsheet for more details. Don't hesitate to contact me or Michael Travis if you have questions. Sincerely, .--i— I l'. )"- Ryan Kingsbery Staff Scientist Enclosures: Cost Breakdown Spreadsheet CC: Michael Travis, Travis/Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. Kaduk SdWO Chorodariraliion Wak Plan Procasa 910017 TM,1Y 81a E lronmenW C.MUlllny, Inc. Prq� TIQa: Karluk School Lharadar4atlon Wmk Pl n Cod ElamaM5n,Od vrn TraYOlP[lenon Emlmnmenml CumuhinE, Inc. SEEM TraYOlP[lenon Emlmnmenml CumuhinE, Inc. Exhibit B Contract FY2018-03 KARLUK SCHOOL SITE CHARACTERIZATION WORK PLAN KARLUK,ALASKA Prepared for: Kodiak IsIdud Borough_ Kodiak Island Borough 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, AK 99615 Prepared by: am TrxvWFctvmn Fnvtmam"w eaasutdny, Im TRAVISMETERSON ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, INC. 3305 Arctic Blvd., Suite 102 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 329 2,d Street Fairbanks, Alaska 99701 1322-05 January 2017 Site Characterization Work Plan Paget 1322-05, Kodiak Island Borough January 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................4 1.1 SITE DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND............................................................................4 1.1.1 Location....................................................................................................................................4 1.1.2 Geology and Hydrology ............................................................................................................4 1.1.3 Property History ....................................................................................................... .................4 1.1.4 Surrounding Uses..........._..........».......................................................... _................................. 7 2.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN......................................................................................_....7 2.1 WORK PLAN DESIGN AND RATIONALE..............................................................................7 2.2 PROJECT FOOTPRINT 8 2.3 CONTAMINANTS OF POTENTIAL CONCERN...................................................................... 8 2.4 SCREENING AND SAMPLING.................................................................................................8 2.4.1 Proposed Soil Screening and Laboratory Sampling..................................................................8 3.0 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES..............................................................„................10 3.1 FIELD SOP .................................... »........................................................................................... 10 3.2 LABORATORY SOP ............... ..................... ............................................................................ 10 3.2.1 Field Sample Preparation SOP............................................................... _............................... 11 3.2.2 Field Decontamination Procedures......................................................................................... 12 3.23 Field and Laboratory Calibration Methods...........................................................................12 3.24 Routine and Periodic Quality Control Activities....................................................................12 3.2.5 Field Quality Control Samples................................................................................................12 3.3 LABORATORY QUALITY CONTROL SAMPLES................................................................13 3.3.1 Data Reduction, Validation and Reporting.............................................................................13 4.0 PROJECT SCHEDULE.................................................................................................................. 13 5.0 DELIVERABLES .............................. _........................................................................................... 14 6.0 CONCLUSIONS.............................................................................................................................14 7.0 REFERENCES............................................................................................................................... 14 Travis/Peterson Ernironmental Consulting, Inc. Site Characterization Work Plan 1322-05, Kodiak Island Borough Page 3 January 2017 LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS AAC Alaska Administrative Code ADEC Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation ARES Alaska Resources and Environmental Services bgs Below Ground Surface BTEX Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Xylenes C. Degrees Celsius COPC Contaminants of Potential Concern DRO Diesel Range Organics EPA Environmental Protection Agency It Feet GRO Gasoline Range Organics KIB Kodiak Island Borough McOI'i Methanol mg/L milligrams per liter mM milliliters per liter PAH Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons PID Photo -Ionization Detector PPM Part Per Million QA Quality Assurance QC Quality Control SOP Standard Operation Procedures TPECI Travis/Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. pg/L micrograms per liter USGS United States Geological Survey UST Underground Storage Tank VOC Volatile Organic Compounds Travis/Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. Site Characterization Work Plan 1322.05, Kodiak Island Borough 1.0 INTRODUCTION Page 4 January 2017 The Kodiak island Borough, (KB) contracted Travis/Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. (TPECI) to develop a site characterization plan to investigate contaminated soils at the Karluk School (hereinafter: school) and school generator building. In August 2013, KB closed four registered underground storage tanks (UST) in-place. Closure activities found petroleum (heating oil) contamination in subsurface soils. The goal of this site characterization plan is to provide the KB and Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC) with information regarding the vertical and horizontal extent of contamination at this site. The plan consists of the following: • Soil borings; • Screening and collecting soil samples; • Standard operating procedures; • Coordination with the ADEC; and • Documenting and reporting requirements. 1.1 SITE DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND l.l.l Location The property is located in Karluk, Alaska within Section 21, Township 30 South, Range 32 West at the Seward Meridian and within US Geological Survey Quadrangle Karluk C-2. Figure I is a vicinity map showing the site location within the region. The primary area of concern is located on K1B property to the north and east of the school (Figure 2). The physical address for the school is: Main Street, Karluk, AK 99608. The latitude and longitude coordinates are: 57.56270278°N, -154.43666667"W. 1.1.2 Geology and Ilydrology Alaska Resources and Environmental Services (ARES) documented the UST decommission process at this site in a report dated September 2013. In the report, ARES noted that the observed soil types at the site consisted primarily of silt and poorly graded sandy and silty gravels (ML, SM, and GM classification). Permafrost is not present at the site. The school is located approximately 750 -ft south of Karluk Lagoon at 110 -ft elevation. Karluk Lagoon is the primary hydrological feature in the immediate area. The lagoon is a marine water passage wherein the Karluk River flows to the Shelikof Strait. Light boat traffic is present in the lagoon during the summer. The waters of Shelikof Strait flow into the Gulf of Alaska. Groundwater is approximately the elevation of the Karluk River. 1.1.3 Proper0, Histor3 The school, generator building, and area of concern are located in Tract F of the Karluk Subdivision (Plat No. 82-13). The property is approximately 5.4 acres in area and has been owned by the KIB since September of 1982. The generator building is a small single story structure (14 -ft x 26 -ft). The school consists of a single story, timber frame building (95 -ft x 10041). Both structures are located in the northern half of the property. No other buildings are on site. TrravislPelerson Environmental Consulting, Inc. Gmundater Flow EM r •;• '�+ mat ri[°�°` ° a t"�i dov�j JA + , i b•`?.�wr 0 .. nay �9 �or w' �•. •i `• a . t 5'TE l j . �. • ♦. 1'Y i .11 ,, \6' " y . DOUN[J11NY 5 /� 7 L. Site Characterization Work Plan Page 7 1322-05, Kodiak Island Borough January 2017 Two 12,000 -gallon USTs and two 500 -gallon USTs were closed in-place by Red Hook Construction at this location in August 2013 (ARES, 2013). All USTs were single-wall steel construction and approximately 30 -years old. In the winter of 2012-2013, school maintenance personnel discovered a leak at a fuel pipe. According to the statement, approximately 100 -gallons of heating oil leaked into subsurface soils (ARES, 2013). Following the UST decommission process, ARES collected 24 analytical soil samples to verify final site conditions. All but one sample were collected around the tanks and associated fuel lines. Maximum excavation depth was I 1 -ft bgs. Eleven samples contained elevated levels of diesel range organics (DRO). The highest concentration of DRO was 7,210 mg/kg. Two samples contained high levels of benzene. One sample contained gasoline range organics (GRO) above the ADEC cleanup level. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) were not detected. Sample analysis indicates that contamination is present in subsurface soils surrounding the four USTs and associated pipe. In 2013, a double-wall, 8,000 -gallon aboveground storage tank (AST) was installed on a gravel pad next to the school (Figure 2). All associated fuel lines are above ground. A 6" PVC water line runs across the northwest portion of the property. This water line connects the community of Karluk with a drinking water storage tank located approximately 1,000 -ft southwest of the school at an elevation of 185 -ft. The tank stores Karluk's drinking water. The drinking water originates from hillside drainage seeps upgradient of the water lank. 1.1.4 Surrounding Uses Downgradient property use is commercial and residential in nature. The Karluk Tribal Council garage, water pump house, and power generator are located immediately downgradienl of the school property. The Karluk Subdivision located just beyond the garage and pump house contains the majority of the community's residences. Property upgradient of the site is vacant land. There are no active ADEC- identified contaminated sites within the vicinity. 2.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN The KIB requested TPECI to complete a site characterization work plan that pmvides details for determining the extent of soil contamination at this site. This section explains this process with a work plan design and rationale. 2.1 WORK PLAN DESIGN AND RATIONALE TPECI designed this site characterization plan to delineate the horizontal and vertical extent of possible petroleum contamination in subsurface soils surrounding the four decommissioned USTs and the generator building. TPECI will use a mobile gas -powered MinutemaffM drill rig to advance soil borings at multiple locations throughout the area of concern. Drill rig auger flights will be replaced with a split spoon sampler in order to facilitate both screening sample and laboratory sample collection. As further described below, samples will be systematically collected from borings at specific depths. All soil borings will be drilled within the KIB property. TPECI will ensure that the soil sampling will be conducted in accordance with this ADEC-approved plan. Results from this site characterization will determine how remedial action and soil treatment or disposal is initialed. Travis/Petemon Environmental Consulting, Inc. Site Characterization Work Plan Page 8 1322.05, Kodiak Island Borough January 2017 2.2 PROJECT FOOTPRINT The project site encompasses approximately 0.5 acres. This estimate is based on site limitations such as the local topography, drill rig access, and previous soil sample results at this location (ARES 2013). Other project site limitations include the school's linear utilities, which include electrical, water, and sewer line (Figure 2). 2.3 CONTAMINANTS OF POTENTIAL CONCERN Contaminations of potential concern (COPC) were determined using Table 2A of the ADEC Underground Storage Tank Procedures Manual for #1 Diesel (heating oil). TPECI personnel will test soil for DRO, GRO, and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) with 10% of samples tested for PAH. Average annual precipitation at the closest climate station (#505425) is 22.06 inches, therefore cleanup level goals for the COPC fall under Method Two Migration to Groundwater Cleanup levels for the Under40-Inch Zone as listed in Table B2 in 18 Alaska Administrative Code (AAC) 75.341. 2.4 SCREENING AND SAMPLING All sampling will be conducted in accordance with 18 AAC 75 and the ADEC March 2016 Field Sampling Guidance. 2.4.1 Proposed Soil Screening and Laboratory Sampling The site characterization will investigate the extent of contamination within soils upgradient and downgradient of the generator building. TPECI will expand soil screening efforts to determine the size and depth of contamination if additional contamination is found outside of this area. To identify and characterize the potential contamination, TPECI will use a MinutemanTM drill rig to drill between 8 and 10 soil borings at the site. Figure 3 shows the approximate location that TPECI intends to drill soil borings. The proposed soil boring locations are based on sample results summarized in the 2013 ARES report, topography, and groundwater gradient. Soil borings will be drilled to a depth of 20 -ft or to refusal, whichever comes first. TPECI believes a 20-0 deep soil boring is adequate for vertical characterization due to sample results from ARES test pits in 2013. Samples containing the highest concentrations of DRO were collected between 1 and 6 feet bgs. According to the ARES report, one of three samples collected at a maximum depth of 11 -ft bgs contained DRO at 236 mg/kg. Thus, petroleum contamination is not likely present in soils beyond 20 -fl bgs. However, drilling will continue if contamination is discovered in soils collected at 20-11 bgs. Heated headspace screening samples will becollected from a split spoon sampler using procedures outlined in the ADEC March 2016 Field Sampling Guidance. Samples will be collected at five foot intervals within each soil boring. TPECI will screen soils using a photo -ionization detector (PID). The PID will detect volatile organic compounds (VOC) in parts per million (pptn). TPECI will use a PID threshold of 20 ppm to determine if soils exhibit petroleum contamination in excess of ADEC Method Two Migration to Groundwater cleanup levels (Under40-inch Zone). TPECI will collect laboratory samples from areas where soil screening samples exceed the 20 ppm VOC threshold. In addition to this, TPECI will collect a single soil sample from each boring determined by the headspace screening process to be less than 20 ppm VOCs. This additional sample will confirm whether the contamination boundary has been reached vertically. Travis/Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. m -• -'tit L (� a( ��� M•: V�.-� '. i A r..y.r .-.vn . - 1' +XT 7 rL�r'/• IJw l.•a l'+r •J�y ♦�!� 7♦lY: il' NSWA i as i ��yti�1•� •�.� � t�J-`SS a 1 :. ��� e r , z ' ,••f. .. 3{ � •wnh � : i. :a �,`aC f n Na l r� `� Y-10 ..r S r • ld Site Characterization Work Plan Page 10 1322-05, Kodiak Island Borough January 2017 The number of recommended field screening samples and laboratory samples will be determined by the parameters outlined in Table I below. Observational evidence such as visual or olfactory observations will also be considered, especially if PID readings arc inconclusive due to high moisture content or if the contamination is found within gravel or cobbled rock. Table 1 Soil Screening and Laboratory Sampling Parameters Area Approx. Length Approx. Est. No. Screening Est No. Lab Lab Sample Depth Samples Samples Duplicates Collect samples of Sail 20.0 deep borings, sails with>20ppm I duplicate per Boring 4 screening samples 20-a• 1 per 5linear feet VOC, AND I sample 10 samples per boring per boring of soil win, QOppm VOC 'Drilling will cominue ifeanlamination is discovered ai 20 -ft Duplicate samples will be collected from areas with the highest VOC readings from the headspace field screening samples. Laboratory samples will be tested for the COPC as described in Section 2.3. Both screening samples and laboratory samples will be collected using methods outlined in the ADEC A4arch 30/6 Field Sampling Guidance. These methods are outlined in detail in the following section. 3.0 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES The standard operating procedures (SOP) for this project fall into two categories, field SOP and laboratory SOP. Throughout the sampling effort, laboratory hold -times and sample temperatures shall be maintained. The SOP contained herein refer to generic field sampling and sample preparation. 3.1 FIELD SOP The PID will be calibrated according to the manufacturer's specifications before traveling to the site. Isobutylene calibration span gas (100 -ppm) will be used to calibrate the PID. The PID will be calibrated before departure to the field because of Federal Aviation Administration regulations associated with the shipping and handling of compressed gas. Screening samples will be collected using a PID, to screen potentially contaminated soils. The hand-held PID will be used to identify contaminant concentrations using the heated beadspace method in a scalable plastic bag. Rocks will be removed from samples as necessary using a sieve. Sealable plastic (Ziplock®) quart -sized bags will be filled half full. The soil, sealed in a plastic bag, will be shaken for 15 -seconds and then allowed to warm up for at least 10 -minutes (but not more than 1 hour) to between 500 and 700 Fahrenheit. The sealed bag will be shaken again for 15 -seconds. The PID intake nozzle will then be placed inside the bag for 10 -seconds and the highest reading will be recorded. 3.2 LABORATORY SOP Field personnel shall keep detailed notes that include: • Project Name; • Date; • Weather conditions, site conditions, other observations; Tmvis/Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. Site Characterization Work Plan 1322-05, Kodink Island Borough • Sample collection date and time; • Sample identification number; and • Sampling methodology. Sampling location plan view: • Sampling location cross-sectional view (if applicable); • Unusual characteristics of the sampling location; and • Any problems encountered during sampling. Page 1 I January 2017 Field notes will be collected in an all-weather notebook. The notebook utilized will not be dedicated solely to this project, but only information relevant to the project will be included on pages assigned. Combined project field notebooks reduce project costs and minimize waste generation. Field notes will be written in pen, pencil, or water-resistant marker. When field conditions result in illegible content due to dirt, precipitation, or poor penmanship, field notes will be recopied immediately after field activities. 31.1 Field Sample Preparation SOP All samples will be prepared in accordance with laboratory instructions. At a minimum, the following information will be included on the sample label: • Client name; • Date and time of sample collection; • Sampler; • Sample location; • Preservative, and • Analytical test(s) to be run. In addition, the above information will be recorded in the field notes. Chain of custody records will be maintained for each sample. Samples will be kept between zero (0) and six (6) degrees centigrade (°C). The Field technician will place custody seals on all coolers to determine if the samples may have been tampered while being transported to the laboratory. The laboratory will notify TPECI in such an event so that a decision can be made on whether or not re -sampling is necessary. All laboratory soil samples will be analyzed for GRO compounds by method AKI01, BTEX by EPA Method 8021B, and DRO by method AK102. One sample for every 10 laboratory samples will also be analyzed for PAH using EPA Method 8270D to comply with ADEC's requirement of 100/n+ sampling of PAH for diesel contamination (ADEC March 2016 Field Sampling Guidance Appenrlty F). Table 2 Analytical Methods and Sample Requirements Method Matrix Container(Jars) Preservative Hold time 14 -oz amber wide McOH and 8021 (BTEX) Soil mouthjar with septa 0-60 C 14 days lid 14 -oz amber wide McOH end AKIOI (GRO) Soil mouth jar with septa 0-6° C. 14 days lid Travis/Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. Site Characterization Work Plan Page 12 1322-05, Kodiak Island Borough January 2017 AKIO2 (DRO) Soil l 4oz amber wide 'ar 0-60 E= 14 days mouth 8270 (PAH) Soil 14oz amber wide 'ar 0-6° C. 14 days mouth Soil samples destined for volatile analysis will be collected first, followed by samples collected for non- volatile analysis. Soil sample containers will be filled to a volume (mass) ranging from 25 to 50 -grams of soil (approximately 1/3'u container volume) and will be immediately preserved by pouring methanol over the soil and promptly securing the Teflon -lined container lid. Care will be taken to ensure soils are completed covered with preservative. Should more than 25ml of preservative be required for a given sample, documentation of total preservative volume will be recorded in the field notes. 3.1.2 Field Decontamination Procedures Field personnel will use clean disposable sampling gloves when acquiring samples. A stainless steel trowel and disposable plastic spoons will be used for the collection of samples. Prior to use and between each sampling location, reusable sampling implements will be immersed in a bucket of Alconoxe detergent cleaning solution, scrubbed, rinsed, and dried. The small volume of wash and rinse water will collected in a bucket or drum and stored on site. TPECI will use absorbent pads to remove sheen from the rinse water. Used absorbent pads will be disposed of using a SmartAsht, bumer. 3.2.3 Field and Laboratory Calibration Methods All field and laboratory procedures requiring instrument calibration will be conducted according to the applicable Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) methods, the ADEC methods, and standard operating procedures. The manufacturer calibrates the PID annually. The PID will also be calibrated with fresh air and a 100 ppm isobulylene calibration standard daily before it is used, The EPA checks the calibrations traceable quality control standards for the laboratory. 3.2.4 Routine and Periodic Quality Control Activities SGS Laboratory, an ADEC-approved laboratory, will be used for all soil samples. This section describes the methods used for determining the quality of laboratory results. 3.2.5 Field Quality Control Samples Field personnel will take two types of field quality control samples. These are sample duplicates and trip blanks. The objective and frequency of these samples are discussed below. TPECI will not collect field blanks or equipment blanks. TPECI will rely on field duplicates and trip blanks for quality control and determination of artificially introduced contamination. 3.2.5.1 Field Duplicates Field duplicates are samples collected simultaneously from the same sampling locations. Field personnel will use identical sampling methods to retrieve one duplicate for every 10 samples. TPECI will follow the some QA/QC methods for collecting, packaging, recording, and shipping the duplicate samples as all other samples. 3.2.5.2 Trip Blank Trip blanks are samples prepared from sterile media at the laboratory and shipped with the sample containers. Trip blanks remain with the samples after collection and are analyzed for volatile compounds. Tltis analysis determines if any cross -contamination occurred during shipping. Field personnel will never open the trip blank containers during the entire sampling process. Field personnel will use one trip blank per cooler. If the laboratory finds any contamination within the trip blank, the results will be used to evaluate any possible impacts to associated samples. Travis/Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. Site Characterization Work Plan Page 13 1322-05, Kodiak Island Borough January 2017 3.2.5.3 Field Blank TPECI will not collect field blanks for this project. The logistical challenges associated with transporting an unknown (and potentially large volume) of analyte -free (de -ionized) water to the site would result in an operational burden. 3.2.5.4 Equipment Blank TPECI will not collect equipment blanks for this project. The logistical challenges associated with transporting an unknown (and potentially large volume) of analyte -free (de -ionized) water to the site would result in an operational burden. TPECI will conduct thorough Geld decontamination procedures as described in Section 3.2.2. 3.3 LABORATORY QUALITY CONTROL. SAMPI.FS The project laboratory will use matrix -spiked samples, spiked duplicates, surrogates, method blanks, duplicates, and laboratory control samples to measure data quality. Matrix spiked samples and laboratory control samples assess sample matrix interference and analytical errors and accuracy. Surrogates evaluate accuracy of an analytical measurement. Method blanks check for laboratory contamination and instrument bias. Duplicates measure the precision of the analysis. The laboratory will use one method blank per sample period and use one laboratory control sample. The laboratory will use a surrogate spike for every sample, standard, and blank. The laboratory will use one matrix spike per sample period. 3.3.1 Data Redaction, Validation and Reporting Data reduction is conducted by the analyst. All calculations are made as specified by the particular analytical method. Units are reported as mg/L, µg/L, µg/mL or as otherwise called for in the method. Analytical data reports will include: • Client name; • Date and time of sample collection; • Sample location; • Date and time samples received at the laboratory; • Date analysis completed; • Laboratory sample ID number; • A list of parameters analyzed; • The analytical method number for each parameter; and • Concentration of each parameter. The laboratory will forward a copy of the completed analytical results to TPECI. 4.0 PROJECT SCHEDULE The KIB intends to commence the work outlined in this site characterization plan in the summer of 2017. TPECI anticipates project completion by the end of the 2017 summer season. Travis/Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. Site Characterization Work Plan 1322-05, Kodiak Island Borough 5.0 DELIVERABLES Page 14 January 2017 The data deliverables for the project shall include a written report summarizing field activities, results, and conclusions. The report will include or specifically address the following information: • Site investigation overview; • Laboratory results; • Field observations; • Investigation findings; • Conceptual Site Model; and, • Recommendations for future site work. 6.0 CONCLUSIONS It will be the goal of TPECI to provide the KIB and the ADEC with a comprehensive understanding of the extent of contamination present at this site. Soil samples collected from numerous soil borings at the site will provide information into the vertical and horizontal extent of the contamination. TPECI will use this information to generate a site characterization report that summarizes field activities, sample results and recommends corrective actions for site remediation. TPECI will notify the ADEC 48-hrs before mobilization. TPECI will also coordinate with the ADEC on an as -needed basis during field activities if additional guidance is needed. 7.0 REFERENCES Alaska Resources and Environmental Services (ARES, 2013), "Karluk School UST Decommissioning". Red Hook Construction, LLC, September 2013. Travis/Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER 710 MILL BAY ROAD 1047 - 03 Fp KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 Contract No. 1017;9 Change Order No. 01 Project Name, Number & Location Amount of Contract & Change Order Karluk UST Site Characterization Original Contract S 21,390.00 469-614 452.140 11009.4A.A Previous Changes S 0.00 Contractor This Change S 3,192.18 Travis/Peterson Environmental Consulting Adjusted Contract S 24,582.18 Description of Change Cost Additional cost for Karluk site characterization, including staff time for sampling at old playground site and for sampling costs paid directly by Travis/Peterson. S 3,192.18 The time provided for completion of the contract is (Z unchanged) (F1 increased) ( decreased) by 0 calendar days. This document shall become an amendment to the contract and all provisions or the contract will apply thereto. Accepted By: I 1 t,.,c� '✓. Date: /0/////7 Contractor's Rcprescntativc /t'1 n•,i �JrS Recommended ' t Date IDI 1 Le I I4 Engineering/Facilities rirector �e Appraed➢y: C(Ie_ Date Manager ess rhon S°. in c rd � o ug i Jerk nor erceeding 5700,000) , .,_ —e.a Per Borough Code 3.30.100, if the cGaage7ffden�o frve percetrt (5%) and not exceeding nvo hundred thousand dollars (5300,000), it will require approval of the ntoror and deputy presiding officer, if it exceeds 5% or S200,000, it will require the approval of the A.ssenrbly. Please attach Assembly newsletter indicating appruval. Revised by FISEC 04123/14 Kodiak Island Borough Engineering & Facilities Department Projects Office 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Phone (907) 486-9210 Fax (907) 486-9347 Date: October 12, 2017 To: Bob Tucker, E/F Director From: Matt Gandel, Project Manager/InspectorR6-- RE: Contract 2017-39 Change Order #1 Attached is change order #1 to contract 2017-39 for Travis/Peterson Environmental Consulting (TPECI) for the Karluk UST Site Characterization project. KIB entered into a contract with TPECI to do a site investigation and soil sampling at Karluk School, at the site of decommissioned underground storage tanks. Based on reports from other contractors at the site, KIB requested TPECI expand the scope of their investigation to include the old playground site, which increased the labor hours and sampling costs. It was also agreed that KIB would pay directly for the sampling costs, but due to an oversight TPECI paid for them, resulting in an increase to the contract amount. Since KIB planned to pay for these sampling costs directly, it was agreed that TPECI would only be reimbursed for the direct cost of sampling, without any additional markup. There is currently $68,000 remaining in the budget for this project, adequate funds for this change order. Contract 10636 Invoice No. 10695 10765 10837 Balance Staff Scientist 5 36,800.00 $ 140.00 $ 630.00 $ 8,890.00 5 5,040.00 5 2,100.00 Program Manager S 1,11000 S 18500 5 165.00 S 647.50 5 18500 $ (92.50) Clerical Admin $ 30000 5 185 DO $ 115.00 Airfare S 2,040.00 $ 667.00 $ 3,771.00. $ 12,398.001 Per Clem S 40000 5 104.29 5 73.77 $ 221.94 Vehicle Rental $ - S 321 5 28.28 ; 5 (31.491 Equipment Rental $ 74D.00 5 740.00 Sampling 5 - 5 2,810,00 5 (2,810.00) Markup 5 - 5 116 18 5 580.96 5 (697.131 TPECIEquipment S S 34000 S 340001 TOTAL 5 21.390.00 $ 325.00 $ 1,705.68 S 17,141.51 5 5,410.00 5 13.192.181 KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 Contract No. 2018-03 Change Order No. 02 Project Name, Number & Location Karluk UST Amount of Contract & Change Order Original Contract $ 21,390.00 469-614 452.140 11009.4A.A Contractor Travis/Peterson Environmental Consulting Previous Changes $ 3,192.18 This Change $ 33,700.00 Adjusted Contract $ 58,282.18 Description of Change Cost Cost to develop a Soil Removal and Vapor Intrusion Work Plan for contaminated S 33,700.00 soil at Karluk School, based on proposal dated November 16, 2017. Cost includes field work to monitor soil removal and final report to DEC. Cost is not to exceed amount to be charged on time and materials basis. The time provided for completion of the contract is (N unchanged) Q increased) (0 decreased) by 0 calendar days. This document shall become an amendment to the contract and all provisions of the contract will apply thereto Accepted By: _ 1 I "Ju r— 0 jn tun- Date: 111 De Contractor's RepresentatitiiveMiew.4ar_ D 7-AA✓/5 Recommended:/4± Date 1 t I?; I t k E'nngiilneerinng/FFaccJili ' s Director Finance Director Approved By: Attest: ''ii- S Dale I(4 ManagertLes as 5%In and ,�rBorou Q nor=eeding S200,000) n7'Cha0 P0l icrs -.. Pet -Borough Code 3.30.100, ijthe change order is up to fiv 11(5° la Wing hvo hundredtharrsand dollars (S200,000), it will require approval of die nrayo 1r si r Q9 er ff it exceeds 5% or 5200,000, it rvi/l require the approval of the Assembly. Please a lri� ne r indicating approval. Revised by FISEC 04/23/14 Kodiak Island Borough Engineering & Facilities Department Projects Office 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Phone (907) 486-9210 Fax (907) 486-9347 Date: November 28, 2017 To: Bob Tucker, E/F Director From: Matt Gandel, Project Manager/Inspector/-f(r- RE: Contract 2018-03 Change Order #2 Attached is change order #2 to contract 2018-03 for Travis/Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. (TPECI) to develop a Soil Removal and Vapor Instruction work plan for contaminated soil at Karluk School. In 2013 KIB closed in place four underground fuel tanks at the school. There is still contaminated soil remaining from when the tanks were in use. In June 2017 KIB entered into a Professional Services Agreement with TPECI to perform soil sampling mandated by the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC). Now that samples have been taken determining the extent and level of contamination, DEC is requiring a written work plan to remove portions of the contaminated soil, as well as perform vapor instruction testing at the school. TPECI will also perform site work during the soil removal, taking samples to verify to DEC that the contamination has been removed, as well as produce a final report documenting site activities. The budget for this project has approximately $62,000 remaining, sufficient for this change order cost. Travis/Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. November 16, 2017 Kodiak Island Borough 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, AK 99615 Michael D. Travis P.E. Principal 3305 Arctic Boulevard, Suite 102 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Phone: 907-5224337 Fax: 907-52-14313 e-mail: mtmvis rr tpeci.com Attention: Matt Gandel, Project Manager/Inspector Laurence A. Peterson Operations Manager 329 2nd Street Fairbanks, Alaska 99701 Plmnc: 907-055-7225 Fax: 907-055.7228 e-mail: lany©ipeci.com Re: Proposal for creating the Karluk School Soil Removal and Vapor Intrusion Work Plans and Implementation Dear Mr. Gandel: Thank you for requesting a proposal from Travis/Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. (TPECI) to develop and implement a Soil Removal and Vapor Intrusion Work Plan for the Kodiak Island Borough Karluk School in Karluk, Alaska. The Soil Removal Plan will focus on excavating the contaminated soils located along the eastern side of the school. The Vapor Intrusion Work Plan will respond to the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation request for evaluating the school's indoor air inhalation pathway relative to nearby contaminated soils. The Soil Removal Plan will describe using a mini -excavator to excavate the petroleum - contaminated soils alongside the school as discussed in the Site Characterization Report. Approximately 30 cubic yards of diesel contaminated soil exists at this location. The Work Plan will also include contaminated soil treatment and disposal methods. The Vapor Intrusion Work Plan will provide methods for assessing air quality for volatile gases in the Karluk School. This may involve inserting monitoring probes along the school exterior wall as well as installing passive air monitoring devices in the school's crawlspace. TPECI estimates the cost to complete this work is $33,700 assuming poor weather conditions do not restrict travel or disrupt working conditions. See the enclosed cost breakdown spreadsheet for more detail. A work day in the field is 12 -hours. TPECI assumes air sampling equipment rental, sample analysis, heavy -equipment rental, heavy -equipment operator, and lodging will be provided by the Karluk School and was not included in cost estimates. Travis/Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. Page 2 TPECI anticipates completing the field work in July of 2018. Upon receipt of sample results, TPECI will provide a written report within 10 working days. Please feel free to contact our office if you have any questions regarding this proposal. TPECI appreciates your business and looks forward to working with you. Sincerely, Ryan Kmgsbery �1 Staff Scientist CC: Michael Travis, P.E., Travis/Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. Enclosure: Cost Breakdown Spreadsheet TravlslPeterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. c p p a p o 0 0 3 o pp 0 0 N N 2 0 NwNwwa m IM1 C q P N q 0 E D: m N � q �w a N 3 e U � T GC .1 4 E N 9 C C U ' 4 c t m u E ¢ e c ` 3 e w m > Y c q W e P O C m O p O eo= c� o� m of m e V W _ eem Y q a a Y p p 0 o p o 0 0 0 o pp 0 N N owwwwwwwwp m 0 NwNwwa m IM1 G P N N o �w C N Q w wn E m E P O O O p O O p p N C i N O m O O a 0 0 o p m 0 0 0 o p o 0 C w N N N N N N N N N N w N O H O E �NwwwNw O p p p p p p w O E Q Y C � 0 0 o p 0 m F ° = p p o C N N N N N w N N N N N N N � 00000a m E o G ^wowNm c '^ a m 00 Q '^ O U EN m w c m N 7 E g nb a o a N 0 0 N N a c 0 0 N N 0 N 0 0 p OI O N P N a N a m N N E N N a N C q r v a = 7 ¢u 0 0 0 0 0 p o 0 o p N N N N N N N p p r w p N p p N N p w p o O w m N r Y E w p p p o 0 N 3 ¢ a N m o N y O O O N P N N N m P N w F m p N N c p p p a p p p f�U E„wmwN„ m A a v a J J ¢ O N y c o7 U 0m U q n c m o c _ q N E so m0-5 � Y m I_ W Nyym'a'S o¢Waai N O O O O O nN N N N N w Q U N H L D d E E¢ a I g c . I aWwwwcu I p p p p p o 0 0 0 0 0 o pp 0 N N owwwwwwwwp m m IM1 G P N N Ifl n �w wn E ^ P O O O p O O p p C i 0 0 o p o 0 0 0 0 o p o 0 C w N N N N N N N N N N w N 7 E 0 0 0 0 o p o 0 o p p p p p o C N N N N N w N N N N N N N � m E c '^ a 00 c 7 E g nb a o a N 0 0 N N 0 0 N N 0 0 N N 0 N 0 0 p OI O N P N a N a m N N E N N a N C 7 0 0 0 0 0 p o 0 o p N N N N N N N N ry C O o N p p p o 0 O O O N N N N P N w q N m A a v _q 'E J J O U 0m U _ q N E Y m o¢Waai THE STATE 01ALASKA. GOVERNOR BILL WALKER October 11, 2017 Via email and USPS First Class Mail Matt Gandel Kodiak Island Borough 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, AK 99615 RE: Site Characterization Report Approval Kodiak Island Borough Kaduk School Hazard ID: 26202 Dear Mr. Gandel, Department of Environmental Conservation DIVISION OF SPILL PREVENTION AND RESPONSE Contaminated Sites Prom 410 Wltoughby Ave.. Sidle 303 P.O. Bar 111800 Juneau, Alaska 99811-1600 Main: 907.4655368 Fax: 907.4655262 w .dec.olauko.gov File: 2564.26.001 The Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, Contaminated Sites Program (ADEC) has reviewed the "Site Characterization Report for Kodiak Island Borough Karluk School' (Report) for the Kaduk School USTs 1-4 site in Kaduk, Alaska dated September, 2017. The Report was submitted via email on September 19, 2017 by Travis/Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. Fieldwork was conducted on August 6 through 8, 2017 and generally consisted of advancing ten soil borings and collection samples for field -screening and laboratory analysis. The objective was to delineate the horizontal and vertical extent of petroleum contamination. Analytical data collected confirmed that petroleum contaminated soil is limited to depths of 5 and 15 feet below ground surface. Diesel range organics (DRO) was identified near all three former UST's. Ethylbenzene in two samples (SB5-5 and duplicate SEX -99), collected by the generator, were up to 22 times the 18 AAC 75.341 Table B1 Over 40 inches Human Health cleanup level and approximately three times above the Migration to Groundwater (MI'G) cleanup level. Both analytes were detected above 18 AAC 75.341 Table B2 Method Two Migration to Groundwater soil cleanup levels. In samples SB5.5, SB99 .Y, and SD6-5, 1-Methylnapthalene and 2-Methy1napthalene remain in the subsurface between 5 to 15 feet bgs at concentrations two to three times the MTG cleanup level. Naphthalene coneersmtions 3 to 21 times the MTG cleanup level were also confirmed in samples SB5-5, SB99 .Y, and SB6-5. Groundwater was not encountered during August 2017 field activities. This report is approved. Petroleum -contaminated soil remains above applicable cleanup levels between 5 and 15 feet below ground surface, and within 30 horizontal feet of the Kaduk School. Volatile compounds were confirmed present in sails at the site; therefore, the indoor air inhalation pathway needs Matt Gandcl Kodiak Island Borough October 11, 2017 to be evnlunted. Please submit a work plan by November IS. 2017 to evaluate vapor intrusion. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at 465-5368 or via email at ter y.rndman n.alaska.Pov. Sincerely, �,Almynn Project Manager cc: blas[ Gandcl, Kodiak Island Borough via email Ryan Kingsbery,'rmvis/Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. vin email KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAICs ALASKA 99615 Cnniract No, 2018...03 Change Order'No. 03 Project Name, Number & L=6011 Amount of Contr2ct & Change Order Karluk UST _416 11 . ...... ................ . . Original Contract, 5 21,390-00 .. .-614 451140 11009.4A.A Previous Chnnges S 36,892.118 Contractor Lus Change 8'.Samoo TravistPeterson Environmental, Conskitifing Ad.Justed ContrHa $ 66,78118 Ower ipfion of Change I Cost Additional coks required lo tincet Alaska Deparlinent, of Environmental S 8,500m Conservation (,A DEC) tectudreineiras for the riano-val orcoraummated soil at Karluk School. ADEC required additiorial sampling1repoirting efforts to verify that val.,ior intrusion -was not a concem for the contaminated soil that Nvas left in place due to existing obstructions. This cost is a not-tD-excecd amount to be charged en a flirne and materials basis., The thne provided rGr completion or tihe ron tract 1.9 (M unchanged) (U incireased) (U decreascd) by 0 coicndar days. 1111's documcnk,Atall becoine an ainiendnima to the contract and all provisions ul"flie contiract will aDDIV ffiffC10. Accep:d By: Confin, kar's Represemadve A4vcf4AcA e— Z� Recommended:,# Engering/171 �,'k' Dirm D""irecloi Jinc1 ZMEM Maaagcir (L EtT liffou.1916 1#1 give r-Kreeding SM"260) Per Borough Cmale 3,30. 100, ij'ihe 1houvand efollars, (5200,00q), . gNlirll $200, 000, it as require fire al;1yrowal of IRevised by FISEC 04123M4 Date- 10h '5 / We L012'rWI-1—V '7percenf (5%) and not exceeding hPo handred Kodiak Island Borough Engbteerlhg & Facilities Department Projects Office 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Phone (907) 486-9210 Fax (907) 486-9347 T W10 iiill�!�Iri= Attached is change order 403 to contract 2018-03 for Travis/Peterson Envirownental Consulting for the Karluk UST project. This change order is for additional sampling and reporting efforts for the contaminated soil remaining after closure of the four underground storage tanks at Karluk School. Due to the proximity of the soil to the school, the Alaska Department of Environmental Consulting (ADEC) required additional efforts to investigate possible vapor intrusion. These efforts were not anticipated or budgeted for in the original contract amount. A draft copy of the final report to ADEC including the vapor intrusion analysis is attached. This change order is a nX t to exceed amount that will be charged on a time and materials basis. \%/ ;Lt, -V-'j X � \: FOR K% d /K SCHOOL D AK ALASJf *«fes ¥ 4< 10 Mill Bay' Kodiak, ±a«» [rommPITWIMz�RIM1] � INSULTING, INC. APPENDIX E - AST B&R BTEX r, 'i COC CSM DRO EPA GRO KIB MTG Pdaska Administrative Code Alaska Dainamnent of -Abovcground Storage Tank B&R Fish By Products Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Xylcnes Below Ground Surface Contaminants of Conccm Travis/Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. I T ,PYP -M M—MM M WIR M, 111111111111111W� M- RJ U IT., P tZMA W Off -0 J Environmental Consf!!pw mion AIDEG in November 2017 statin ath confirmation soil samples would be collected from the site, The work plan consisted of following objectives. "A 1. Remove contaminated soil; 2. Collect heated headspace screening andlaboralo Reconated aal 3. struct excavrea with clean materil 4. Treat contaminated soils. M MO TPECI personnel guided the screening and confirmation soil treatment process was taR rm MiTTIFIrIM My. I WN 1 0, 1 n in Tract F of the Karluk Subdivision (Plat No. 82-13) on ately 5.4 acres in area and has been owned by the KIB appr7 "i iFC 7 P i ig! irid dovz, eradijT 7 1 IVIIIIIII 111,11111,111, 11" '1117 , FI' -------- ... PFT.' TravislPelemon Environmental Consulting, Ine. Cars tailed Soil Removal Report Page 5 1322-11, Kodiak Island Borough October 20 18 U-07.7VU 74TUR NUN the school building. 1.2 CONTAMINANTS -OF C NCERN Ab, 0 As stated in the Site Characterization Report, diesel range or ki KO) was the primary contaminant orconc� i ; COC identifiedat andix F a D -iold Sa U Table I ADEC-Approved Laboratory" lysis Methods LYN Ma WAMN TU �I i 1 5,1 U�11 l"I'l, 111 1 I & " "Ill 161 mi'"WhIl"'44,an "a. w-utritted with a water Vapor filter to rield screen soils to distinguish between contaminated an non -contaminated soils. A PID benchmark of 20 parts per million (ppm) was used to distinguis between soils. B&R used a mini -excavator to remove approximately 16 cubi contaminated soil from two excavated areas in Area 1. The two excavated areas are rererred to Pit I and Pit 2 in this reDort and are the result orsub Travis/Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. Contaminated Soil Removal Report Page 6 1322-11. Kodiak Island Borough October 2018 landrarm on site. Landfarm details are covered in detail in a separate Landrarm Report, See the Photo Log in Appendix B ror photos of the soil removal process. 2.1 i'5-011, SCREENNG AND SAMPLING METW*DS Screening samples were collected from the Area I excavation and contaminated soil stockpile. two screening samples from the excavation sidewalls of Pit I (Figure 3, Appendix A). TPECI personnel collected a total of three screening sample within the excavation base and nineteen screening samples from the excavation sidewalls of Pit 2 (Figure 4, Appendix A). Five screening samples were collected from the contaminated soil stockpile,, 04Mg" 7 wl ill &M. Table 2 ffivdsjuice Screen Ing Results for A;4T Exi saimple 10 Location a Dec. �thffr�el) PM Pit 1� It. �01.1 8 40 5 ��� III Pit I 11.5 Mwi Pit I I X63 WTUI -819118, 1 215 stgai; 11 426.0 0958 -7-6 3 SW13 o su Pit 11%f1(d?11T 6,0 Mis 1� 52 Sl4 ii 60 B191riB PEI �1111'1` + 0.3 W16 'r Po 113.. 5 1'(9118 49 35 X119 5.1 Pit 1 33 0118 188 WL9 Pit 1 ! 7.,0>$f9118 W20 Pit 17-0 ON CIO W1-- —Pit 1 8191-1 R —16A W22 Pit 105 819118 1 B3 ............... h2 . .,.m . . . ................. 105 . ... .................. 919118 129 114 Pit 2 .. 45 . 8110119 0,5 i2 45 8110118 00 W23 Pit 2 40 819118 05 919118 00 40 819118 O'l W�'-26" Ptt 2 85 919118 0.0 Travis/Peterson Environmental Consulting. Inc. Contaminated Soil Removal Report Page 7 1322-11, Kodiak Island Borough October 2018 SW31 Pit 2 1 3.0 911011H Ills 32 Pit 2 80 —7!— —8/101IB . . .............. Pit P 9 !—A, W—T3 —Pit2 MW3 . . . ........ . T�,W-2 § 7.5 8!10118 43 F —W3— Pit 2 . ....... W- -0-1011-1i—'- -29-1 5 3 P, 2 4,0 '—Cl (V 1-8 0 4 0 811WI8 . . ......... W5 9—W3— pit 2 4 0 8!10118 0.4 9—W39 Pitt 80 8110118 rP� 1y8 '§W--40— '-9-12 � . ....... . . 7-5 . .. .. ... ........ 8/10,18 2 Pit 2 RD y —f/-10/19 -M IM, Five out oft t -fo screening samples collected above20 pro and two out of p nineteen screening samples collected from Pit2 er � , 10 ppm. Screening samples above 20ppm were collected from areas withg%visual and o (Netr ry characteristics or petroleum contamination. As expected, all rive screardn'ki,- les coft"d rrom the contaminated soil stockpile were above 20ppm. Following screening samples, cdWirroation 1 11 pies and associated duplicate samples 'Alwn'v'p, 11111111�,'-Irp. OPP N were then collected rrom exce""Ied. akii wi I, est concentration of VOC as determined by "Y the PID. 2.2A PLE RESULTS A total samples were collected (including duplicate, 1 99) from Pit I an qOetation were removed rront samples to avoid lob processing compli lysis accuracy. TPECI personnel collected all samples using the A ting procedures described in the Soil Removal Plan. These proc uresdiremctf�b`jenec.�,,,-"' o outlined in the ADEC Nold Sampling Guidance (August 'e . .. . . .. 2017). ry, W 17 rA cleanup level are in bold. Travis/Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. Z'111 6 rt 1 1 83 1 sit 9111 847 JWl, 1 1 ij�4 7,�811&18 864 p;" S 3 P It 10119 853 SW41 Pit 2 2.0 Somple dal4kate throl under original sample. U sign$a the anal) -re mu ana 4few but nat detecred "fr Jstpiflaz the quandtafffin U an evanale 0 Sample 5W6 collected from soils immediately unde (158900 mg/Kg). Sample B3 (293 mg/Kg) and duplicate'] ADEC cleanup level for DRO and were ca at the ba MTG cleanup levels. Table 4 below show; the ADEC cleanup level are in bold. Ta Me 4 is for 111 1raxtati0at N =1MIUMNM11 SITC Sail Sample In ti, Cantamihn"t Cleanup .... . ................. . . ..... . ....... .. ............... evo,,, Lella, nn,Bl SWfi SWIG SW12 SIMS Swig B3 B996 MV 26 MV34 S%V39 SW41 I-Meabyinaphtholenc y,1Aj,-6 14AIk1,V:-9U 12AU 12 7U _77-5 72-95 77 -nu 15411 =122J 143U 20.11) 2-Mclh Inn litftailcue imm h1halcue J1 300 KOU Aq!L jL1 L_!ILU_ 12,7U 12,71.1 13AU M 913 72 -UU ISAY 1421.1 143U 20AU 14.OU ITOU 143LF �, MAU 12 M 12,7U - 13,613 12 9U 12AU 15 4U 141U 145U 20AU Acena ilith lent WAO=oc Vobtt A3901 14 OU A, I F2-6- LF -127U ""'Ti 7T 136 U 12 9U I AU 15 4U 14 3U -- 74 57 3o m KOU. jff,9U i-- 95 -1 ii 12711 12,719 72-7U _T3 -65 29U Su 15,49 4=3 1 "Ti U . . . . . ........................ 13=70MUnthracene 280 R 1114lg4j P12,14P 1.360 12.GU 137U 127U 13 619 12.9U 12 SU i 15,411 14-711 145U 2TIU ficum a &-ne 210 !U 005 12 Rl 12,713 12,711 13,M) 11.5! 12OU 15AU 143U 14 541 20AU . .......... 2.700 ITOU 129IJ 1,180 126U 17,7U 127U 13M 4=6 - 12AU 15°415 11411 -- 14.1U 'T4.1U --F- 4313 M ,EEq2pjb1Fl&uLramhcnc 15.11M.000 14,011 rs 12,911 275 127U 127U nwmvm U611 12 9U 12 1 enzalkiflutsmalhenc i 27,000 14.OU 139 -1-B Z 12 61.1 ; 12 7U 117U I dU12-849 12741 15.849 14,211 14 51! 20)11 82.000 ROU 1°"901' 12611: 12 713 12.711 13.611 12 9[1 Do= a.h nndu=cnt 87.000 ROU 12 913 i 84.1 12.641 12 717 12 711 13.601 12,901 12 811 I5.4CU 14 241 14.511 2@1,111 - no= 71", thene 590.660 14.013 12 9U 6-1 D SIT 1,7 12711 � 12.7LP 1160! j 12.90? 12.844 15407 14,3411 (14,515 ?0.144 Fluorcne 36,000 ROU 12,9U 1 636 12 0) 1370U 1270U 13,60J 119t) 2RU 2-- 15,41) 2431 1451,111 20,111 2,3-c®d fa AdAmw- ymn 8,800 14 OU 12.91U 363 12,61912,7U 12,713 13 GU ,- 91j1261:1 ! 15.4 CJ 14.311 14.511 2O 145 1"layahthwtcea 38 11 241 10A15 875 IGIU 10-211 1021' 10.911 10.311 � 10.211 l 12.311 11,415 - 11.611 16,1111 Phenmnthrene 39.000 14 OU 139U 19611 12.11132 7U M 12 13.613 Pymna RUM 14,01' l! 911 4,110 13.103 12.711 12.713 13.641 9 fnlI 9.87, 15,41P 14 301 14,511 20,1!5 ;7.rp.".UP = r PH DWPWM e. U8igs4fica Acanalim %us anal)%affarbw nor dawned J*Wficj the 9wandrallan is an esdawiff Travis/Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. Contaminated oiE Removal Report Page 9 1322®11® Kodiak Island Borough 0dober-2018 Sample SW6 was the onlyle with PAH contaminants ve MTG cleanup levels® These contaminants included Ia y n ale a 19 ), e a l ce a (1,31 ), e elle 5 )b and naphthalene ), Other PAH contaminants er detected in sample SW6 and SW34 but were below MTG cleanup levels® Table 5 shows confinnation sample rul for VOC Samplesabove the ADEC cleanup level are in bold and samples with analysis detection limits above MTG cleanup levels are in italics. Table 5 VOC Analysis lar Confirmation Samples In Area i Clea m mIO i S.l2w „S-,tw o SWI61 I .0, , Level^" m� 6 R�3B ��39 SV4IH elcba�eli6ea11� 220 MOU ( 5-70U 7,5019: 3.9211 07, . 4.66U 5.150 � 6.25 4' 3 02U 18.711 ' 10.RU I0,4U 1601! � �farfi�A,�re 1, 1,15tichlo�ct9anere 32 °d.9OU 7,1041 "9e40U '4.691` 'S 90U `645U 7'; iJ� 6 .. u» �76U 147U 13 M 13,OU 224U • lclraciti 1rra� 3.0 4.4411 3.5511 8.69t1 2.451) 2,911 3,73 j ,9211 12543 M'P38 7.3013 67.5U 61011 112U 9"1 inch 7 1 4 33SEl.l aY�[d 37513 19611 2331! 3.)311 261U 197 48511 1 U 5 2O 1, 6931!'; ichlaradhone 92.0 &9OU 7.1011 ] 9.4081 4,5911 S 5 off' 64511 7' 6 1 4,751 I�34.T 13 SU ; 1301 ; 22511 2 3 Ta�chl 152 0 17 91 , l A 2U' 19 91 � ; 4 601 > 11 12 4U 9 r 13,14! 4 531E N,� �� ,�.�,, a, 29.13 1 26i 26.01 I 22_4U 1am,3 inehlaw �®rve 00}1. �90i! 7„1044 9,4011 j 4.8941 5.6011 ICI r 51! 6.50t! 4 7S 14,A7U 13311 13.011 224U 1; 2° 4 ire _ - 0 R, U � ?.I0 4,4214. 4 S 1 12 vJ :1527 6. 1 4„ 1 l4.7 13. 13 0 24U 1 Z 4 fairnylba�nc 1fva0 17.91 94211 3.130 �I Ate, I1 71 6.45 X1]711" 13,8U--9-5`5-U--29-3t1 , 1-1-6-9F, 26018 fi4911 �� 492FIli 0.24 '3.1641 2,d4C1 3.71!3 i m, mm, 259.! U.2,6141 '1,9111 5,9141! 3.Oi1 -52011 5 20 6D5U- 1, 2-Uschls�e�ir a 7,400 5,4011 7 1011 44013 4a 5� ' � yS 7.: G SDLP 4.7641 . 14.7L1 I 13.511 „ 13 011 22411 Ip28I9$cbl�ssg�; 5,5 a 35611;1 °2.94[16 3,7_511 i1. X2,51131 P2611. tl"9117 ''5.614! '3,4011",'3,2gi3 119,141 1,2 Utah eu r�� 16 0 3.564! 2 R4 �. ,� ,r; X94011 _,„ 196 Iii 3,13LJ )�22.59U� ? 6114 1.91 U S °�Si 5.931 54{1€1 �� � 69.f U mm 1. 3, 5 isirn�C 1b�aszs►� 741 i1 '1;7 h' '4BU1 5" il,1i6.45[1. '7.ZCSLJ �`6.501J 4,7011""`14;,7LI 13YU '�'13,0i9 ;27�bT- _ .. m�m 3-l7ichlorabe nme X00 9.9011 , b� i 1 x, 1 h 4 4 91 � aW �11 �, 64519 7,9511 6 301( 8,.7 11 t4,?L1 IMU 13.011 ,.,-,,,,..�. 22411 �W 1, 3 ilnchl a 18 U 3 1641 , 3 1 96L! 2 5919 3 1311 2 G 141, v9111 5 65L8 3401 5x011 �-. '89,5U le 4 1}sshl�rr+a6en�crt� 37 0 89 1011 4 1 �5��mM U 6.45U 7.0311 6 SpU 4 7449 -vim !4 TLJ l3 SU 13 OU . 224U 2 r�aas� la1I ....m�� 15. ° ' 0 „". 4,pt1 '.4 17x �� `516 ilU 511 79 511 63 019 47 61 H 14711 1351 13013 2� U '�� .. , .� ,;, . ., ,n. 4�te,1 12 c . 1R r 77, W,89,019 - 94 O�IJ 49 pU � 56.0 5 7R 51 65 041 : 47� �„ 6 11 5U 47 U 1471 13_58 130 2,2_11 . � V581 "� E�' 4 3.i5 Llrorrs eeee R 90 l0U 1J `2 45[3' 4 8911 '_29_1!% 3_2341 `3 9211 3 2511 23$17 5 801 6 45U 7 55U 6 5011 4 7511 7 30[1 1,6731] 6,501 14 13°513 13.0U 11211 22411 4.3 8.017 `7 U 9 U 14 49U SAW] ' 64.SU 78511 "A JOU 4 7SU 1�8.T1 �iie0tntainrtta t :p R.9OU ;� 1 '.i 94011 'i 4 5911 5.!!0t323U 78511 6,3fl1! 4,7(8!1 14,? 1 13,5[1 13.01 2?4U�� r 2 0�%y� 710u fila 7,5011 192U I4�S iid23r! "S2 O[1 3113iJ �� 1176 10911 laid '� `179113C®e4 disoalf m wr, 35.51 �I19 37 513 ! 19.611 2} }„ 31 319 i' 26,11117.!11 SE1511 54,241 32,01 973416 Carbin letrae e 2I 0 ""°�1 � 1J 2 45 Z 91 =92-U,', 3 IiT72 351 73413 6 7 G 112l®r� c 4 0 7 Ipll 9 401 4 591 S 110 75511 6 L9 I T9SJ � 14 711 6 7511 13 4 ° 14U cidoiorrErM 7,l A9N111 , 7 1013 94011 46911" 5.6017 ,6451 �l85U 65011 47943 1878 13„411 13,041 �µ ?2441; €0cal c 610.#1 T U ` -7.10H 94016 4 Rd311 5 6011 64511 7.95 & 4 79(11 14 JI 13 311 �3 UT . %3iIgsuaettiattnet%t X25 4 8.90U 7 1013 ;' 9.401 r 49413 wU -5,9 011 , -6-4 513 . 7. RS1J 1 6. 01 471411 14 719 13 Oti 2 ........................^ � ich ill r tlaa _..... m m 3, 17, 6l1 14 2 .��m 19 RU 9 U 1 l.7 12.913 15 711 13,1 U 9.53U „13,513 i 29,3U 36.91) 26.01) ,' 449U , .m, --" 1320 6.4213,E 7 IOU, 260 I"4 $9U : '5 90U 645U 17 83U 6,3014" 41SU . 14,711 13.511 :13,041 � 32441. ti licxeshlowbuladicue 2010 7.I01! 5,7011 7.,5019 3.4211 ! 4 6619 5.,1541 62513 5 2011 3,Et2U '; 11.71 10,9U 10.41 14011 4 r" '1 „�m, 5 U 71 U _- 133 �4 U i l -, ,�5 ��� 6ASU 7651 6.50U,4:7HU - 14713 '13.513 AMU 224U Methylenechlarlde 3300 35.51 284U 37.513 19AU 21.311 25,911 �' 3131 MAU ��, 19 In 54.011 j d4,S1! Tn1�sFt 1-r:4u��th YlU 400,0 35.5U;291,41 µ' 37 51 961] 23.319 ; 35 913 3131 ; 26 ! 13 ,14 511 54,011, 52.013 56ti�„'�� 6 6Vl1t1l�l� 316,0 6 901 7 1011 %! 371 46901 23.31) 6 4511; 7 4151 „ 651114 4.761 '5'8.513 14 7[1 13.51 13 0iI ?2441 ea lln tksxcr 23°1800 119019 7101 9 401 1 4 6"Il3 56011 6 451 7 551 63017 µ4 4913 '52011 Iii 711 13,51 13 0U I U.;, Travis/Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. Fma nxmm f1m,71 It SWI 2, SW 15, B3 and duylicate B99, These results areit, in more detail in Section 4.0. ZZI Meassion-Area l Confirmation satriples results q contaminated soils were sty W OU x/go" collected from Pits I augf., � were component or the Area 1z1,;p1blam% also indicate contaminated" lid' RIMM4 MIM k %. I , I 117MM-1 - T. WRIMT11 , 4, A I MMM 1174roll IT 0 t OT A three distinct locations in Area 1. These areas are Ito 9, 0, , I the SW scre ning sa, ple was collected contained elevated concentrations of DRO (15,900 TravWPeterson EnAmumental Consulting, Inc. + 41mom MukMAM EMEM EN M W=M IM&A-711 "mom ,144 WOMOMMIRMIMIMMM MaMMUM WMI, ..... . .... SWI 2, SW 15, B3 and duylicate B99, These results areit, in more detail in Section 4.0. ZZI Meassion-Area l Confirmation satriples results q contaminated soils were sty W OU x/go" collected from Pits I augf., � were component or the Area 1z1,;p1blam% also indicate contaminated" lid' RIMM4 MIM k %. I , I 117MM-1 - T. WRIMT11 , 4, A I MMM 1174roll IT 0 t OT A three distinct locations in Area 1. These areas are Ito 9, 0, , I the SW scre ning sa, ple was collected contained elevated concentrations of DRO (15,900 TravWPeterson EnAmumental Consulting, Inc. Contaminated Soil Removal Report Page 11 1322-118 Kodiak Island Borough October 201 B tM; the subgrade utties. Assuming soils at this location were similar to the contaminated oved soil remfrom similar depths in Pit I and Pit 2, TPECI estimates between 10 -11 cubic yar s unaccessible contaminated soil remains under the power and water utilities. titjli�1�11 ram, iffolworm�T71k1l 94:0 -ni w- I . . . . . �?M-0 � 11 --1,$ r. ", 't removed and thus, hailed further excavation of the Pi confirmed at 11.5 feet bgs at the base of Pit 1, TP - contaminated soil remain at this [cwion. 11111 M 0 1 CAP M, samples to avoid lab processing c ol NY personnel collected all sam .......... iMMMMUMMME M-ii"Iftle results for DRO and GRO. Samples above the ADEC Nr x1l"I", Table 6 EiRg"imil GRO Analysis roe the Contaminated Soil Stockpile 1""s . . .... Snmplerti I Approx. Percent dom DnIc In D 210 260 epth (feet) i ds SoH As expected, all samples collected from the contaminated soil stockpile contained high %WW' T, T-' TravWPeterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. Contaminated Soil Removal Rq*rI Page 12 1322-11, Kodiak Irdand Borough October 2018 Table 7 shows stockpile sample results for PAH. Samples above the ADEC cleanup level are in bold. Table 7 PAH Analysis for to ata SO Stockpile (45Na' Y; or I-Methylnaphihalene was only above MT(I 'Iq/Kg). Concentrations of other PAH contaminants were nd P4 but were below MTG cleanup levels. ou yile sample results -for VOC. SarnvAes above the ADEC cleanu level are in bold. Y,i ith laboratory detection limits greater than MTG cleanup levels are italicized. Travis/Paterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. ADEC MTG Sell Sample In Contaminant Cleanup ...... . . . .......... . Levels sn SP990 SN 410 457 392 U W mm 1.300 396 337 133 Ac „-h ene i 37.00D 13.80 I4IBJ 1316 1R.Ow Tau14 W U —5 —8U nzoWanthracene 280T) �240 2 270 _�4 _ 162 177 175 2,?00 12f, 345 230 I5.DOD.0(00 At].A 1j 75 1 61.1 ...... .... 27 .0M 98.8 362 .RzA%h,z!ajbmccnC 87,000 )1, 4 �I Q 2051 Fluamthene -50,000 605t(","" t,�,690 675 FlunreneI � I I . . . . . . . . . . . . .I 13-su Is RZ 133U AU 1,2i -Cad " fic I I !' F""i,13J. 1,1(,, 113 2. h1halcae30.............. IGM Phenanthrene 01 201 F96 166 " 741 7' -r88 -"I 7-14 (45Na' Y; or I-Methylnaphihalene was only above MT(I 'Iq/Kg). Concentrations of other PAH contaminants were nd P4 but were below MTG cleanup levels. ou yile sample results -for VOC. SarnvAes above the ADEC cleanu level are in bold. Y,i ith laboratory detection limits greater than MTG cleanup levels are italicized. Travis/Paterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. Contaminated Soil Removal Report Pae 13 1323®11® Kodiak Island Borough 0ii. lolnar 201 Table 8 VOC Analysisror Contaminated Sall'StockLile �7�nnp Sam 1e 113 Cantmaatlarau4 Level IYKC 7, °;l"q 1.1.1,2--Tetrachlormthanc 22.0 740 90OU 8.05U 1; ld I-°%cdi�efste 33,000 9209 : 11217 �` I=10.19 ` 1 1 2, 2-Tauachlonxthanc 3,0 4 6193 5 d0U! 3 f1s1U �1, ! ' 2 °1 ra bl iha2ee 14 3 69U 449 4.0411 i 1. l-Uichlgir�ethae�e 92.0 4 2041 119 1017.5 1,2,3-iaicltl6t & az 150.{3 l&4U 224U 20,29 1 3 nchl® 0.031 9-20U 11213 10.1 U 1. 2.4-Trichl6r6liniutcac 82.0 1 9 2011 � 7 113"', 411 1, 2.4 Tffi eethylbcnscnc m 160.0 725 6S2 `; Al c 0.24 3.6919 " 4 41� 4 04,,,, max,. 1,2. 9 01) �7 � t1��(0' 1�10.1U 1.2-Di6lu ,6 an y :5-1 3,69'4911 ri id! l 2litchlr +roaleattc 16.0 361:x% 449U 4 'll ,mmDlamp ro... , 1 3.3 Trttsthl�bz 1,300° 380 31 fl 3�91ch7sb�rxccx 2,322 9 1126 10 117 1,3 hack$ rsce�e 18.0 �i�';369Uy4U ' 404U i 4-DkIalacobmew 37,11 of J 11,2u to I U 213�ataftn6sasshi ISU04 f 112U AOIU 4s cSh 1129 101 lag to ee lE. " 4'r �a.' 9 �ettz %'l l 4:611 , 5.0517' Fleaaeralrer�eaac 1r�i , �. 4 20"n U to lU Uromescmdrormunce 1719 10.1 U HtUr�rret3 i 4 r 11 2U 10.11} 13������� CIfide�y�,, �369U44 9U 40.4U� CAI chlr� 21 5,60U 5051), acse J��° 469 '011 9 209 l 1 211 10 ! U 926U3 ii' °1121! 10.19 C3(' g, 6100 9.20U '1129 MMU G � r®ttam a 25.0 9.209 11.29 aI1019 131, Uc j 3,900 IR4U 2240 � 20211 n ✓' ��' 1300i 113 9n d 10.111;; r li th Ulad jene 200 7 409 9 OOU 9.090 'u" w14 SAO 681 617 MAUI A %y :, .nuwvn aur rewrtrtxx 161etb chker%dc 330.0 36.19 44 9U 40,4U d °i W�Nf 4bUp I 4000 3699 44 JU 404U t �rrii;� n that 38.0 150 1129 101U �r.ii li Ibeit 23.000 9e20U : 11.217 111.11]',' r�Preepgl6rraz 9.1110 l� flbcnrrrsc +I�D00 _68_0 69_7 7,16J, Styr=c 10.040 9,20U 11243 10.11.1 tcr6-® lbenzene 11.000 9.20U ; 4,131 J 10,7_9 Toluene6.70D 26 5 - 1673 � 10,.111 678 .erg �q. 4I. 'INAU.4 20.2U rJt°as3lacctalc 1100 369Uf„ 449U 404U - �lt 10.90 16919 44VU 4.04U xy1 cz gligaa4l i 867 � 714 21,41 6 Sun r dapikine twed in the rfght afrang1fin1jaOrfe U9z' gfr the aria byre mw analpedfor but not deuvied Jiig"$cx thequanlitation tj an catfmarc TravWPeterson Environmental0 1 tt , Inc. Conuiminated Soil Removal Rqmri Page 14 1322-11, Kodiak Island Borough Octolver 2019 Samples SP2 and duplicate SP99 were the only samples with VOC contaminants above MTG cleanup levels, Contaminants above cleanup levels included 1, 2, 4-Trimethylbenzene (average 688 gg/Kg), and naphthalene (158 pg/Kg) for SW2 only. Similar to confirmation sample results (Table 4) all stockpile samples contained a minimum of six contaminants where laboratory detection limits were greater than the MTG cleanup levels. These six contaminants2- Trichloroethane, 1, 2, 3- Trichloropropane, 1, 2 — Dibromoethane, bromodicbloromethane, bromomethane, and vinyl chloride. These results are discussed in more detail in Section 4,0,. Discussion — Contaminated Stockpile Sample Resulfs,I The primary reason for sampling the stockpile was to del rm ne,4'1160 evaluation idance rovided ' the ADEC Va r Ini i and VOC contaminants to evaluate the po', RMT643M.&M, 777MM, 7UMM, Soilk A component or Step TIMMIETIMR1913F.". intermittenio'4*s of variNtts r removal R ess. The AIS6 "limit vapo, 41gration from during excnvii'64", , I rPECI prevent a complex`'hW M, =1 I -r� 'atial, n exposure pathway,, e Characterization Report on n. The following paragraphs trations of compacted ash and silt in the area Gravel and TIT 811 sI, urce to the roundafion". Based on TPECI observation of soils siders roils within Area I as having low -permeability and thus IIIir vapor migration. Groundwater was not incountered during the soil removal process; however, moist soils were observed. The ADEC Vapor Intrusion Guidance states that "vapors migrate more easily through dry, coarse-grained soil". TPECI observed soils in Area I as moist and thus prevent a complete r s, t:. T-fi-f'rt. S therefore restricted to subsurface soils. leck ill, resent but doe "I �11'11 11 'f' , —, I '' , 11 1, , I'll 11MINW, OPM, Its"I MU W, OM 10,11,11; Trayb/Peterson Environmentol Consulting, Inc. Contaminated Soil Removal Report Page 15 1322-11, Kodiak Island Borough October 2018 i)utdoor air and increase The concentration or contaminants near the building foundation", Th�: ground surrace in Area 1 does not feature a cap and is therelbre not concentrating the inhaiatiQn 1pathway. 2.3.1.2 Primary VOC and PAH Evaluation Step 3 or the ADEC Vapor Intrusion Guidance involves evaluating available soil samples for cross-reference with soil gas target cleanup levels in Step 4. Table 9 below it the primary con 9WI the stockpile are included. Table 9 Primary Stockpile Contaminants KH "AmmRedroulks are Wow the designatal AW'dwnup Um7p, =mwr1mvim � U., t-Tammum naphthalene are the prominent contarf Evaluating the summarized Therefore, TPECI belieVb 0111SIO intrusion �� 0intial or the or plan 4lik",1"huther disc discussed inal retail ILI 3M ADEC MTG samplee 00"'d Above Cleanup Cleanup Level V6 Re Iv,- Level - 230 mg/Kg Illu m g 80 mg/KU 468 5 0 le 170 iVKL YA . . . . ...... 2N" _X 47 2 u 80 p-JKa . .. .. . ... .... ... U&IM2 .... ... .. 19 use �0diylraud mdaemtely high concentrations of A"i'llf, un, Arilhln'�4` Is removed from Pits I and 2, N IZZM to V"'lin Table 9 is useful in understanding what was ffiev4"i))0e more relevant indicator of potential vapor conf, tion samples, Specifically, samples SW10, " and d SW39 from Pit 2 (Figure 4). These Iller Nils along the delineated edges orthe Tank I plume and unlike esentative or soils in contact with the school foundation. itWihese samples is more useful for understanding the vapor n ewi ating the stockpile sample results. This deviation in the in Section 3.0. These five sidewall confirmation samples are 2.3.fo'So'Ih4I Foundation Evaluation The ADEC Vapor n Guidance recommends reviewing potentially impacted buildin2 16will lig �W 11 gggiije the edge orpit i and the side orthe school was 7.5 feet. The school's foundation plan and details engineering drawings confirm that the school has a combination concrete slab foundation and crawlspace (Appendix i I is located within 10 feet if 0%-e cizcrete slA iii i i..f-%e sc%,vQJ _TjfL Lriptvt ZY feet a i --I( foundation transition. At the closest point, Pit 2 is approximately 10 feet from the slab-to- crawisloace foundation transon. This is sipjacant because Cke ADEC PaDor lgrigiwi-f'� Travh/Pelerson Environmental Consulting, Inc. ContarainalLd Sail Real Repon Page 16 1322-11, Kodiak Island Borough Oclobar=g 11#1041 [#" 0(a I oil i J6jjj7=,LLl 8 feet bgs and approximately 10 feet from the school's crawlspace foundation (Figure 4). Analytical results from these two samples, shown in Tables 2, 3, and 4, are therefore representative Y 111TITOP a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . conclude that the chances of vapor intrusion at the ore vuln"', foundation, the crawlspace, is quite low. V various depths ranging from 3.0-10.5 feet bgs and,,, Wkbles. 2- md 4. e S�i IM 0 1 0 *Fcollected from sidewalls at gpi 1proximojy 7.5 feet Hirt, the school's �Mn Mib p, three samples, shown above in Ilifitj ,ibut the slab foundation. Results for 7',0, %'1)4 mti' Iti, this location but that no PAH or levels only delectable VOC analyte L p Kg ror all three samples. With onable to conclude that the is low. 2.3.1.4 Prer u,1,*'?ath*iiyVEOluafion The ADEC Pr!o !on ince states that "Preferential pathways ... may allow vapors to `V/ x, ja� migrate morts,4111,1911y inT building ", Two linear utilities (power and water) directly In Are' As previously stated, TPECI believes approximately 10 - intersected ank I I I I cubic of u ss contaminated soil remain under these two utilities. Therefore, OKI TPECI belle"'", at the Pres, e or utilities at this location was the only factor evaluated in this report that m cont billed to an increase in vapor Lmnsmissivity to the school foundation. The possible extem ination along these utilities is unknown; however, given the low Permeability of soils e in Area 1, TPECI believes these utilities would have contributed little, ir any, to the vapor intrusion pathway. deviations. The fim deviation involved unexpectedly encountering the subgrade power line. Berbre excavating the soils in Area 1, TPECI and MR spent significant time identifying utilities as they daylight from the slab foundation inside the school utility room. The AST aboveground Travis/Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. Canto inaled Soil Removal Report Page 1 1322.11, Kodiak Island BoroughOctober 2018 fuel line, water line, and power line were all positively identified. Sewer and communications utilities were also located but were of lesser importancebecause were« «aAi outside area.delineated Tank I Ah;--Rx—Kw-,Rftb « « availableas-built couldconfirmlocationthepowerlinebeyond where it enters the school insidethe Utility room.11'. TPECI and iB 4 K slowly removed contaminated soil from Area 1. Aller the second day of removing contaminated soils, B&R identified a "ditch line" that appeared to run directly from the school utility room to 11 «A 1 � k ' 1 � le ch � ' 4 "'. « M .., f Y ,'-"..... f ' « , i 1 1 " i ♦ ".,f 4 iM A -: . I i The second deviation involved rasing the Pit 1 and Pit 2 side indicators for potential vapor intrusion into the school tia6 was s ecifi i t r plan. la stat �e laboratory samples from e contaminated soil t c ale 1 %A contamination removed from Area 1, and (b) to provide sa iGS analysis. After significant consideration,' EC1 believes ria` „l/r TOT results results for characterization purposes was v a bt��the ui a ��rr r���° o evaluation o f the vapor intrusion pathway w rigor 1 is that the edges of the plume were success6l tlel t reled school. Confirmation sarnoles afrom t excavation to i characterize 'r, n ff-. F « - `.. 7-n- = 10 1) or VOC (Method: I analysis.primary _ reason this occurred for samples AWr « « « I P Checklist in Appendix r - i, o Conlarninated Sail Removal ep l Page 18 1322®11, Kodiak Island HGraugh OdahLr 2018 i 1 , R . 1 mkopirm, , six contaminants where t y i f detection e M These six contaminants , 4 , oM ' y, 1 w Y Dibromoethane, bromodichloromethane, bromomethane, and vinyl chloride. Discussions with 6 t. consistently produces detection above D- level fori.e VOC compounds. These compounds are listed below in Table 10, VOC analysis method 8260 LL SIM, IS Table 10. SGS personnel bell t VOC compounds are not c6m6on CtitltF#til1IlEEted by fuels, 1 1°ore, T T9 c®ucenimlions above th,EC claim" request method 8260 LL S, is s l`c M1 r-,,��, -'r; i� - �,Tables(1 usability should It r,., ,��,y Appendix f 1 " 1 i �I � I 1 1, r" , ► V ,�„ 1 f � ' I� , i k 1 A-. � " "! 7- „ � � ' ►� A 1 M 1 i i" ! } � b S i4 � f'- , Y , `; - � � ' Y ," 1C lml;4mw4v-tl-ol-l1.UKIWIJ,Uljg-Qj-lg,tjslilI too 11 f 1 suw, 5- , 4 , ' " 1 " A ► , i4 , i1 1" samples, the excavated area was back Filled with clean native soils. Confirmation collected from Pits I andindicate thatthebulk lY petroleum contaminated soils were successfully removed from Area 1. All sidewall confirmation samples Travis/Paterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. Contaminated Soil Removal Re Page 19 1322-11, Kodiak Island Borough Oclobcr 2019 -ollected from Pits I and 2 were under MTG cleanup levels, which indicates that no lateral component of the Area I contarnination plume remains. Samples collected from the base of Pit I m1so indicate contaminated soils were successfully removed at this location. By contrast, TPECI u c var ateA YInali 171111 11.1�lal een 13-16 c WON' MWAOIR'11110611 x nM find either of these as conducive to va r intrusion. For ex n Tve. ,14difiWTXJIV- COT 1TVU Room 4;VA%WW';AM , --- 1'4 ,a.,7 I I I t't' I t 1,; Y;' sent in soils beyond the Tank I plumz.,djjN,,,, I permeability of soilsi and cq4�11"t Jill iT the other discussed evaluations, TPECI ntrusion is of low risk. WTMMT1I Hs beyond the plume, it would be reasonable to assume th qgp"'p, 1,i,4,the potential to impact the school via vapor intrusio. Matior. (triTYdnxY—Tir nritkwav is Ncarutitle In Ln a a < rq I Shp 0 uj u on In Ln a a < rq C M 0 I Shp Ln . ...... ... ..... .. .. . .. . . ....... . . . . ... ...... A! a E CL 4a z ui Ln TA tu w CL C M 0 m I ��L 4a m I ��L N _ f Q rr U cay °i LU E ed U d 7 OLP M to M ry m iY w an �tl° j M fl M JR to r. N w 'Jill rA (� � �� JyJ vr✓ 'eg n LA ru 7 °k 191V, �p Av,vv q / i�� �cc ' g'%/ ' ^ r( if i^f N z w tn to ry E c c WC m u E v u O CW to G lh w r+ aim IL N N �. �.,. ,,,,� A C d O I ICODIAIC ISI,AND R0'R,0'LTGF CON'TRAcr cHANGE ORDER 710 M11.1, BAYROND KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 Cararact'llslo. 2018-:0,3Charsp Order No. 1014 Pirofect No me, Nuirribmr & LcwAflonAmount �or Contract &ChangeOrdem- Karliuk t 61" ....... .................... I ........................................................................................ ............... ............................................ Orighital Contract $ 21:,390.100 469-16 14 452,140 11009.4,A. A PITviousCsmarm ges S 45,392.18 C!iamilmetair S 8216 En,v"iroiii�Fyi,ent-a'I,Consultii�iiy 12�s chariv . M. .... . .......................................................................................................................... Adin sted CorvIract S 67,6108.27 Descripticon of chningir. 1I Cost AddRionalwark reqUilred to xneck Alaska Department or FnV�ronmentd ..ib9 Corm swervatiori rrcquircinems for contarninated soll Ht'KarlukSichool, iricludino c,dking and rcm,flmitfirq (!!'nnLavninatcd�Soi I Reirniuval lRepoiri, and pricparingend rvP-seoson Landfarm'Replart. I nw:Ome ,P 1 ro: vided fiv coMpIcRion or me coinvis ( u act ,N nqmn,ed) (p ........... I 411creased) (I ........... I rhe lcireased lb G 11 ralendair days. 'fis doctment shall beciorne an �'rmnicirsdirnicnt W flic cuinlraicif and allll Provisions urche contract wiH ainMv thierclo, Per Burough ir. Me 3.30.100, ?1"th c rhou.vand dollars (1200,000), it miff requfretyl $200,000, it will reqillh"e ME upproval qf lite Rc6!!icd by FISEC,'104/23114 4ptruVor and deptappresiding qfficer; if 11 rmweds,5% or Pleasc atfach Amembly rrejurpSfeffep Midirating approval, �s iii➢;��1��/ji � , �, Engirieering& FacilitiesDepartment Projects Office 7 10 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, l 15 Phone( 7)486-9210 ax ( 7) 3 7 Date: November 16,2018 ® Phil Kovacs, E/F Director From: Matt Gandel, Project Manager/Inspector/4— RE: a erg sect® Contract 2018-03 Change Order m.�.... .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... . Attached is change orderto contract 2018-03o °s sEnvironmentalns i for the Karluk UST project. This change order is for additional workrequired ee Alaska Department of Environmental Conservationit a is for contaminated sit at Karluk School. required several revisions and additions to the Contaminatedoil Removal e , and alsorequired - -se sig s notie i TPECI's contract.These will be the final costs fort is project untils i resumes in summer 2019. rravis/Peterson Environemntal Consulting U -M, i7 Contract Arnou-rt Orginal Contract $ 21,390.00 CO 01 $ 3,1 211 CO 02 $ 33,700.00 CO 03 $ 8,500.00 Current Contract $ 66,782.18 Invoices Inv. 10636 $ 325.00 Inv. 10695 S 1,705.68 Inv. 10765 $ 17,141.51 Inv. 20837 $ 5,410.00 Inv. 10956 $ 790.00 Inv.11 1 4,49750 Inv. 11053 $ 3,318.00 Inv. 11100 $ 6,534.00 Inv. 11313 $ 144.00 Inv. 11373 $ 2,836.58 Inv. 11443 $ 12,193.51 Inv. 11506 $ 9,307.50 Inv. 11567 $ 3,405.00 Total Invoices $ 67,608.27 Enage (CO 04) $ (826.09)