Loading...
ATS 49 TR N-32A-1 & KODIAK TWNST BK 2 LT 7 - Other Agency PermitsDCIVI DT'MIaSad U14'4r164 WMVC 1 a —lu—al 1 :u.vu 1 nayu iaWWIY WI au.u• Fvv•nr, •v- r1/4“o. Regulatory Branch Project Evaluation Section - South PERMITTEE: Queen = Fisheries =dba. East =Poi nVSeaioods=Company EFFECTIVE DATE: REFERENCE N0. UULY 0 61992 98, Near Island Channel Z DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT MODIFICATION Depart:ont of the Army permit No. 2- 880598 Near= Is1`and- Channel -2; was issued to Queen Fisheries on December 28, 1988, to •p1 ace approximately 1,200 cubic yards of shot rock fill into Naar Island. The dimensions of the fill area are 40' x 40' x 20', with a slops of 2:1. The purpose of the fill was to create a marine dbtlk to support a refrigerated van and provide a storage area.' The permit'is hereby modified and authorizes therfollowing activity; 'Construction of an extension to the existing dogqs�. The structure measures 70'x 103', and will be bui"it on steel pilings with a cancrato dacfk. All work will be ro me! cU a 1e, l ; attached plan, one sheet dekFac accordance Z In addition, the following'special condltibni are hereby included: • 41, The use of the permitted activity seat not interfere-10th the public's ridht to free navigation an ail navigable waters of the United States. 2. You must install and maintain at your a nse, any -safety lights and signal& prescribed by the.ifnited States Coast Guard (USCG), through roguiationa 6P otherwise, an your authorized facilities. The USCG may be reacted at the following address and telephone number: USCG Marine. Safety Office, 701 'C' Street, Box 17, Anchorage. Alaska 99513 or ca11 (907) 271.5137 In Kodiak, the USCG can be reached at (907) 487 -6750. SCANNED SENT BY:Alaska District USAGE ; 0-15-92 ; 1,0;50 Regulatory Brancn4 nUU1AM 14L, ounuuun t All other conditions under which the subject authorization was wade remain in full force and effect. If the activity authorized herein is not completed within 3 years of the date of this letter, the authorization of this modification, if not previously revoked or specifically extended, shall automatically expire. This authorization and the enclosed modified plans should be attached to the original permit. Also enclosed is a Notice of Authorization 41114h should be posted in a prominent location near the authorized work. CONCUR BY AUTHORITY OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY; $t©NED V) lel r Akers -CO Banner/Ono/3-2712 DDB(24 /30 June 92 (1146b) Georgina Akers Chief, West Unit Pralect Evaluation Section - South Enclosure BCF: Mr. Svend Brandt- Erichsen, ADEC, Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Mr_ Lanes Trashy, ADM, Anchorage, Alaska 99518 -1599 Mr. Richard B. Thompson, ADNR, DLWM, Anchorage Alaska 99510 Ms. Faye E. Heitz, DGC, Anchorage, Alaska '49503 -2798 Mr. Dan Robison, Jr., EPA, Anchorage, Alaska 99513 Mr. David McGiliivary, U5FWS, Anchorage., Alaska 99501 Mr. Ronald J. Morris, NMFS, Anchorage, Alaska 99513 Dr. Steven T. Zimherman, Chief, NMFS, Juneau. Alaska '99802 Division of Governmental Coordination 3601 C Street, Suite 370 Anchorage, AK 99503-5930 CERTIFIED P 479 041 906 MAIL Kodiak Island Borough Ms. Lind Freed Director Community Development Kodiak Island Borough 710 Mill Bay Road Kodiak, AK 99615-6340 -6..* MAY I ,..74 •Wilz` 1K 7'J OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET DIVISION OF GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION SOUTHCENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE 3601 "C' Street SUITE 370 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503 -2798 PHONE: (9071 561 -6131 FAX: (9071 561 -6134 Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested - _QUEENLFISHERI ES11 C/O Mr. James Major P.O. Box 1637 Kodiak, Ak. 99615 CENTRAL OFFICE P.O. BOX AW JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811-0165 PHONE: (907) 465-3562 FAX: (907) 465 -3075 WALTER J. HICKEL, GOVERNOR NORTHERN REGIONAL OFFICE 675 SEVENTH AVENUE STATION H FAIRBANKS, ALASKA 99701.4596 PHONE: (907) 451 -2818 FAX: (9071 45 1 -28 14 May 14, 1992 Dear Mr. Major: SUBJECT: NEAR'" ISLAND _CHANNEL 2- MODIF.ICATIONI. STATE I.D. NO. AK920424 -16A CONCLUSIVE CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION The Division of Governmental Coordination (DGC) has completed coordinating the state's review of your project for consistency with the Alaska Coastal Management Program (ACMP). This project was originally reviewed for consistency under State I.D. No. AK880928 -25A. That review authorized the placing of approximately 1200 cubic yards of shot rock fill into the waters of Near Island Channel, Kodiak, Alaska (LOT N -32B 410 Marine Way, T. 27 S., R. 20 W., S.M.). The fill area was to create a marine dock to support a refrigerated van parking and storage area. The modification proposed is_for the construction of a 70 foot by 103 foot addition to the south end of the existing dock. The proposed dock will be a steel pile supported structure with a concrete deck. The location is T. 27 S., R. 19 W., Section 32, S. M., SW /4. This modification has been reviewed according to the State project alteration policy which allows, if necessary, stipulations to be modified, deleted or new stipulations added to ensure that the project remains consistent with the ACMP. This conclusive consistency determination, developed under 6 AAC 50, applies to the following state authorizations: Ak. Dept. of Environmental Conservation (DEC) Certificate of Reasonable Assurance U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) Section 10/ Section 404 Permits Based on the review of your project by the Alaska Departments of Natural Resources, Environmental Conservation, and Fish and Game, and the Kodiak Island Borough, the state agrees that your proposed activity is consistent with the ACMP, and this letter incorporates the modification into the original consistency determination. The original stipulations remain in full force and effect. This conclusive consistency determination represents a consensus reached between you as the project applicant and the reviewing agencies listed above, as provided under 6 AAC 50,.070(k), regarding the conditions necessary to ensure the proposed project is consistent with the ACMP. As also provided under 15 CFR 930.64(c), federal authorization of your project will be made with the full understanding that your original project proposal has been modified subject to the conditions described above. If changes to the approved project are proposed prior to or during its siting, construction, or operation, you are required to contact this office immediately to determine if further review and approval of the revised project is necessary. If the actual use differs from the approved use contained in the project description, the State may amend the State approvals listed in this conclusive consistency determination. Please be advised that although the State has found your project consistent with the ACMP, based on your project description and any stipulations contained herein, you are still required to meet all applicable State and federal laws and regulations. Your consistency determination may include reference to specific laws and regulations, but this in no way precludes your responsibility to comply with other applicable laws and regulations. By copy of this letter we are advising the COE of our determination. Other Concerns /Advisories: If cultural or paleontological resources are discovered as a result of this activity, we request that work which would disturb such resources be stopped and that the State Historic Preservation Office be contacted immediately (762- 2626). This consistency determination does not obligate DNR to issue authorization under AS 38.05 nor does it supersede the statutory obligations thereunder. You may not proceed with any specific land use activity on State lands until authorized by DNR. If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 561 -6131. Sincerely, P FraRkie Pillifant Project Review Coordinator cc: Linda Freed, Kodiak Island Borough Dixie Banner, COE Mike Miller, DNR Tim Rumfelt, DEC . Wayne Dolezal, DFG Queen Fisheries, 420 Marine Way, Kodiak, Ak. 99615 - MEMORANDUM State of Alaska TO: Frankie Pillifant Project Review Coordinator Division of Governmental Coordination Office of Management and Budget FROM: C. Way a Dolezal Habitat Biologist Region II Habitat Division Department of Fish and Game DEPARTMENT OF FISH & GAME DATE: May 12, 1992 FILE NO.: TELEPHONE NO.: 267 -2284 SUBJECT: East Point Seafood Near Is. Channel 2 SID AK920424 -16A COE No. M- 880598 The Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF &G) has reviewed the dock construction project referenced above. The project-entails building a 70 foot wide, 103 foot long steel pipe pile supported, concrete capped extension to the south end of the existing dock. We have no objection to the project as proposed. Pursuant to 6 AAC 80.010(b), the ADF &G recommends that this project be found consistent with the Standards of the Alaska Coastal Management Program and the Kodiak Island Borough Coastal Management Program. We appreciate the opportunity to comment. If you have any specific questions, please contact me at 267 -2333. cc: P. Probasco, ADF &G L. Freed, Kodiak Island Borough M. North, USFWS R. Morris, NMFS N 11 MAY 1 41992 COfiA &1UO UNITY VIA FAX 561 -6134: Kodiak Island Borough 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 -6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 Frankie Pillifant, Project Review Coordinator OMB -DGC, Southcentral Regional Office 3601 C Street, Suite 370 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 -5930 RE: Near Island Channel 2 - Revisions (City Tidelands N32 -B) SID AK920424 -16A Dear Ms. Pillifant: May 11, 1992 The Kodiak Island Borough has reviewed the modification to Department of the Army permit no. 2- 880598, referenced above. The permittee is currently requesting that the permit be modified to included "the construction of an extension to the existing dock. The structure, measuring 70' x 103' would be built on steel pilings with a concrete deck." We have reviewed the proposed permit with the City of Kodiak Harbormaster, who has no objections to the modification as noted. We do not believe that the modification will cause coastal effects significantly different than those originally anticipated. As a result of our review we recommend that the modification be found consistent with the Kodiak Island Borough Coastal Management Program (KIBCMP) and the Alaska Coastal Management Program (ACMP). Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the permit modification. Sincerely, Linda L. Freed, Director Community Development Department c.c. W. Dolezal, ADFG J. Major, Applicant G. McCorkle, Harboiniaster, City of Kodiak M. L. Plumb - Mentjes, COE T. Rumfelt, ADEC R. Thompson, ADNR MEMORANDUM STATE OF ALASKA Office of Management and Budget DIVISION OF GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION 'ID: Project Reviewers N� FROM: &ankie Pillifant / 0 Project Review Coons. DATE: April 24, 1992 FIFE NO: Near Island Oharnel 2- Revision AK920424 -16A TELEPHONE NO: 561 -6131 SUBJECT: Project Alteration Review Attached are materials for a modification being proposed by Queen Fisheries (dba East Point Seafood Company) . The proposed revision is to include- the construction of an extension to the existing dock. The structure, measuring 70 feet by 103 feet, would be built on steel pilings with a concrete deck. This project was originally reviewed in 1988, under State I.D. No. AIB80928 -25A. The Project Alteration Policy provides direction on how the State responds to projects that have previously received a conclusive consistency determination and all necessary permits. Through this policy, the State must determine if the modification would be consistent with the Alaska Coastal Management PtLyLdm (ACMP) . The policy allows an initial maximum 15-day review to determine if the proposed project amendment will cause coastal zone effects significantly different than those originally anticipated. If it is determined that the project will cause impacts which could render the project inconsistent, the project may be subject to a 30 or 50 day review if requested by a reviewer. In the gacn of either a 15-day review or a longer 30/50- day review, Day 1 is the date the modification was initially circulated. If the amendment ent will not result in significantly different effects and remains consistent with the ACMP, the amendment will be incorporated into the original consistency determination. However, stipulations may be modified, deleted or new stipulations may be added to ensure consistency. If the applicant does not agree to the modified consistency determination the project is subject to review elevation procedures. Please comment on the consistency of the proposed revision within 15 days, by May 8, 1992. If a reviewer believes that the project modification is significant enough to warrant a 30 or 50 day review, please submit a request before May 8, 1992. The request must include an explanation on what significant impacts would be different than originally anticipated. Distribution List DEC c.. DNR rte 403 t -D a- • DFG u. COE Coastal District �G + ets C0Mh lNi?Y DEVELOP■riEffr DEPARTMENT Phone DEC cw.--fteett DNR / A'" eft,Ar COE _'l+y_. ___./ PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET E OF S OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR OFFICE. OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET DIVISION OF GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION PROJECT TITLE: r - t Walter J. Nickel, Governor SOUTHCENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE 3601 t' STREET SUITE 370 ANCHORAGE. ALASKA 99503-5930 PHONE:'(907) 5616131 �z STATE I.D. NUMBER: AK91 b4 ) DGC CONTACT: Phone 561 -6131 Fax 561=6134 APPLICANT/PROPONENT: DIRECT FEDERAL ACTION: YES NOO REVIEW TYPE: CONSISTENCY 7 ANILCA ACTIVITY TYPE: ARMED FORCES COMMERCIAL LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN MINING: HARDROCK PLACER_! OFFSHORE_ OIL & GAS PUBLIC _UTILTTLES IFACILIT IES PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL FILL PLACEMENT_ FLOATING STRUCTURES PROJECT LOCATION: Nearest Coastal Dis Project Inside the D District Plan Approved Agent ) PhontriF, OCSLA NEPA OTHER. FISHERIES PRODUCTION: GENERAL_ HATCHERYi REMOTE RELEASE_ ENHANCEMENT PROCESSING AQUATIC FARMS: SHELLFISH" AQUATIC PLANTS HYDRO POWER TIMBER REVIEW MILESTONES: Day 1 A -T-1/4-.R Z� VI. at 2 Reviewer Request for Add'! Info Comments Due To DGC fy J Notification To Applicant Decision Deadline /• REVIEW SCHEDULE:. 15 DAY 30 DAY 50 DAY OTHER PROJECT PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED UNDER STATE I.D. NO. AK STATE APPROVALS (LIST AGENCY, APPROVAL TYPE, NUMBER): J NOTE TO REVIEWERS: Distribution of applications for appropriation of water constitutes DNR's agency notice under AS 46.15. Separate notice from DNR discontinued beginning January 1991. FEDERAL APPROVALS. (LIST AGENCY, APPROVAL TYPE, NUMBER): .`�- 1-.0. V. -Coe- EX + 'SICN C:°„.: FORS. 1. Formal Information Request 2. Project In U.O.B. 3. DNR Disposal 4. Miscellaneous Applicant Request 5. Proposed Finding En Route Elevation to Directors, Elevated by Elevated to Commissioners, Elevated -by 6. Public Hearing Held 7. Field Review 8. SMCRA 9. Unusually Complex Project CLOCK STOPPED ON: REASON tl: CLOCK ACTION AT CLOSEOUT: CLOSE OUT DATE: DISTRICT COMMENTS RECEIVED; Yes No FOR CONCLUSIVE CONSISTENCY DETERMINATIONS: Consistent Consistent With Stipulations Inconsistent Number of Stipulations FOR OTHER REVIEWS: Comments Submitted ON: Withdrawn t SENT DY:AtasKa District USAGE ; 4 -16 -92 ; 11:44 ; Regulatory 8r. ^0h4 0075616134;g 2 Coastal Project 4 , e'stionnaire and Certi is ion Statement Please answer all questions. Include maps or plan drawings with your packet. An incomplete questionnaire may be returned and will delay the review of your packet APPLICANT INFORMATION 1. QUEEN FISHERIES Name of Applicant 420 Maxine Way Kodiak, Alaska 99615 (907) 486- 5799Swte Phone Zip Coda awes •Major .ontact Penan P.O. Box 1637 Allem Kodiak, Alaska 99615 •( 07) 986- 5799Smw Phone Zip Code PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Provide a brief description of your project and ALL associated facilities (caretaker facilities, et): Construction of a 70'x103' addotion to an existing dock. The proposed dock will be a steel pile supported structure with a concrete deck. Starring Date for Project Coring 1991 Ending Date for Project Pall 1991 PROJECT LOCATION • r 1. Please give location of project (Include nearest community or identifiable body of land or water.) Near Island Channel -- Kodiak, Alaska ' Township 27S .Range 19W Meddiritti' wa e Section 32 Aliquot Pans 9W DSOS2viali'A -2 2. Is the project on: (pkan pia,* with ,/) Stain Land Federal Land Private Land X%R Municipal Land 3. Project is located in which region of the state (see attached map): Northern &atheism:cal ...:61XX. Southeast PERMIT APPROVALS 1. Do you currently have any State or federal approvals for this project? If yes, please list below. Yea ci (Note: approval means permit or any other form of authorization,) Approval Type Approval # Expiration Date FEDERAL APPROVALS 1. Will you be placing structures or fills in any of the following: tidal waters, YDS ND streams, lakes, or wetlands *? OE El * (f you are uncertain wiatlw your proposed project area it G a wetland. ealaei eM Corps of Engines, Regulatory Branch as (907) 753.2720 for a werlands deterauamion. If you an outside the Anchorage area, call toil free 1.800478-2M. If yes, have you applied for or do you intend to apply for a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Yea Na (C ©E) permit? Please indicate at right and describe below. SENT BY :AIaska District USACF ' t -16 -82 6 11:45 6 Regulatory Branch-, ' )2. Have you applied for or do you (... to apply for a U.S. Environmental € ;ecr. -.4, Agency National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit? Please indicate at right and describe below, (Note: Any wastewater discharge requires an NPDES permit.) 3. Have you applied for or do you intend to apply for permits•frorn any other federal agency? If yes, please list below. Agency 80756161346# 3 yet Q Approval Type Date submitted (or intend to submit) DNR April, 1991 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL. RESOURCES` APPROVALS 1. Is the proposed project on state -owned land or will you need to cross State lands for access? 2. Is any portion of your project placed below the ordinary high water line of a stream, Liver, lake or other water body? 3. Will you be dredging? If yes, location of dredging is: Township Range Meridian • Location of disposal site for dredged materials: Township Range Meridian Section 4. Will you be filling with rock, sand or gravel? If yes, amount? • Location of source: Township Range ._,.�. Maddiaa_ Secdan • Location of area to be flied: Township Range Meridian Section 5. Do you plan to ttitO zny of the following state-owned resources? Timber • If yes, amount • Location of source: Township Range Meridian Section Other Materials • If yes, what materialq ism• beading, rmee, silt, overouraed•epc.) • Location of source: Township Range Meridian Section 6. Are you planning to use any fresh water? • If yes, amount (gallons per day)? • Source ? 7. Will you be building or 8. Do you plan to drill a geothermal well? 9. Will you be exploring for or extracting coal? 10. Will you be exploring for or extracting minerals on state -owned land? 11. Will you be exploring for or extracting oil and gas on state -owned land? 12. Wr11 you be harvesting timber from 10 or more acres? . 13. Will you be investigating or removing historical or archaeological resources on state -owned land? dam? -2- SENT 6IY;AIasKa District USAGE) 4 -16 -92 ; 11 :46 ; Regulatory Dr-- °.hy 9075516134;# 4 r44.:Will the project be located in se if the Alaska State Park System? If you answered NO to all questions In this section, you do not need an approval from the Alaska Department of Natural Resources (DNR). Continue to the next section. If you answered YES to ANY questions in this section, contact DNR to identify and obtain necessary application forms. Based on your discussion with DNR, please list (below) the approval type needed and date submitted. Approval Type Due Submltud (ar tatead to submit) Have you paid the fling fees required fort the DNR permits? If you are not applying for DNR permits, indicate reason below: a (DNR contact) told me on approvals or permits were required on this project. b. Other: DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME APPROVALS Yes No (date) that no DNR 1. Will you be working in a stream, river, or lake? (This includes running water or on ice, within the aeive floodplain, et islands, the face of the banks, or the stream tideflata down to mean low tide.) 'Name of stream or river: . Name of lam: If you answered "no ", proceed to question C. If "yes ", will you be doing any of the following: a) Building a dam, river training structure or in b) Thing the water? c) Diverting or altering the natural channel stream? d) Blocking or damming the stream, (temporarily or permanently)? e) Changing the flow of the water or changing the bed? f) Pumping water out of the stream or lake? g) Introducing silt, gravel, rock, petroleum produc any type into the water? 10 Using tha steam as a road (even when frozen), or crossing the stream with tracked or wheeled vehicles, log - dragging or excavation equipment (backhoes, bulldozers, etc.)? i) Altering or stabilizing the banks? Yea. No .❑ ❑ ❑ El Mg o. j) Mining or digging in the beds or banks? k) Using explosives? 1) Building a bridge (including an ice bridge)? m) Installing a culvert or other drainage sanctum? n) Constructing a weir? -3- SENT BY :Alaska District USAGF "-'4 -16-22 11 :47 i • • o) Other in- stream structure (.7 " entioned above? Regulatory Braoch4 9075615154:g 5 u Yet No 2. Is your project located in a State Game Refuge, Critical Habitat Area, or State Game Sanctuary? ❑ a 3. Does your project include the construction and operation a' a salmon hatchery? 4. Does your project affect or is it related to a previously permitted salmon hatchery? 5. Does your project include the construction of a shellfish or sea vegetable farm? ❑ Ea If you answered NO to all questions in this section, you do not need an approval from the Alaska Department of Fish and Game (DFG). Continue to the next section. If you answered YES to any of the questions under 1 or 2, contact the Regional DFG Habitat Division Office for Information and application forms. If you answered YES to questions 3, 4 or 5, contact the DFG Private Nonprofit Hatchery Office at the F.R.E.D. division headquarters for information and application forms. Based on your discussion with DFG, please list (below) the approval type needed and date submitted. 0 Approval Type DUI Submitted (or Weed to aubmiq If you are not applying for permits, indicate reason below: a PEG contact) told me on approvals or permits were required on this project ..._. b. Other: • (date) that no DFO DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION APPROVALS • 1. Will a discharge of'wats water tom htdustTal /?_r romm x iia1 operation occur? (See I#2 in "Federal Permits" section) 2. Wi11 your project generate air, emissions front the following: • ' a) Diesel generators totaling more than 10,000 hp? b) Other fossil fuel -fired electric generator, furnace, br boiler totaling greater than 10,000 hp, or 9,000 kWh, or 100,000,000 btu/hr? c) Asphalt plant? d) Incinerator burning more than 1000 lbs. per hour? e) Industrial process? 3. Will a.drinldng water supply be developed that serves more than a single - family residence? 4. Will you be processing seafood? 5. Will food service be provided to the public or workers? 6. Will the project result in dredging or disposal of fill in wetlands or placement of a structure in waterways? (Note: your application for this activity to the Corps of Engineers will also serve as your application to DEC.) 7. Is sewage or greywater disposal involved or necessary? —4— e a 0 El Elu al El 0 C Cl M INJ CI ❑ Z1 ©c SENT BY :Alaska District USAGE ;4 -18 -92 ; 1 148 ; _Regulatory Dr---1-0 e;'WIU your project result in the dev' meat of aeurrently unpermitted fac}T ty' he disposal 'of domestic or industrial soli 9. Will your project require offshore drilling or vessel transport of oil, or other petroleum products as cargo, or include onshore facilities with an effective storage capacity of greater than 10,000 barrels of such products? 10. Will your project require the application of oil or pesticides to the surface of the land? ❑ If you answered NO to all questions in this section, you do not need a permit or approval from the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC). Please continue to the next section. If you answered YES to any of these questions (see #6 Note), contact the DEC Regional Office for information and application forms. 9075616134;# 6 El El El Based on your discussion with DEC, please list (below) the approval type needed and date submitted. Approval Type Dan Submamd (or intend to aubm10 If you an not applying for permits, indicate reason below: a. , (DEC contact) told the on (date) that no DEC approvals or permits were required on this project b. Other. * Certification Statement The information contained herein is ante and complete to the best of my knowledge. I ce>;tify that the proposed activity complies with, and will be conducted in a manner consistent. with, the Alaska Coastal M' ; truant Program o complete your packet, please attach your state permit applications and copies *of your federal applications to this questionnaire. -5- UNITED STATES .._PARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service 222 W. 7th Avenue, #43 Anchorage, Alaska 99513 -7577 April 7, 1992 Don M. Kohler Chief, Permit Processing Section U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Alaska District P. 0. Box 898 Anchorage, Alaska 99506 -0898 Attn: Mary Lee Plumb - Mentjes Dear Mr. Kohler: Re: Near Island Channel 2 M- 88055gMENT 1PR 13 19S `VERNM E Reference is made to your letter dated March 30, 1992 regarding an application from Queen Fisheries, dba East Point Seafood Company to include the construction of an extension to the existing dock. The structure, measuring 70' x 103', would be built on steel pilings with a concrete deck. The National Marine Fisheries Service has reviewed the above referenced application and believes the anadromous, estuarine, and marine fishery resources in the vicinity of the proposed project can be adequately protected under the standard conditions of your permit. We, therefore, have no specific recommendations at this time and do not object to permit issuance. Our review and comment on this permit application do not constitute the full public interest review or cumulative impacts assessment required of the Corps of Engineers. We are, however, willing to assist you with those living marine resource issues identified during the public interest review process. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. R' a ris Western A ..ka Office Supervisor Protected resources Management Division NMFS Contact Person: Matthew P. Eagleton cc: ADEC, ADFG, DGC, EPA, USFWS: Anchorage Applicant DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, ALASKA P.O. BOX B98 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 89506 -0898 REPLYT I MARCH 3 :* R92 ATTENTI ON OF: M Regulatory Branch Project Evaluation Section - South M- 880598 Mr. Ted Moninski Office of Management and Budget Division of Governmental Coordination Southcentral Regional Office 3601 C Street, Suite 370 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 -5309 Dear Mr. Moninski: This is in response to a request from Queen Fisheries, dba East Point Seafood Company dated February 10, 1992, concerning a modification of Department of the Army permit no. 2- 880598, Neer-islavithaisselsa That permit was issued to Queen Fisheries on December 28, i988;- to•p"lace approximately 1,200 cubic yards of shot rock fill into Near Island Channel. The dimensions of the fill area are 40'x 40'x 20', with a slope of 2:1. The purpose.of_the fill was to create a marine dock lo support a. refrigerated van and provide a storage area. The permittee presently requests that authorization be granted to include: "the construction of an extension to the existing dock. The structure, measuring 70'x 103', would be built on steel pilings with a concrete deck. This office has determined that the modification as proposed is not significant enough to warrant a full public interest review. Your comments concerning the matter must be received within 15 days of this letter. If no comments are received, it will be presumed that your agency has no substantive objections to the authorization of the modification as proposed. Should you have any questions concerning this proposal., please call Ms. Dixie Banner at (907) 753 -2712. Sincerely, . In 1-\.d\ 1 k'ie./\(:) 1504K; Mary Lee Plumb -Mentjes, Ph.D. Western Team Leader Project Evaluation Section - South Enclosure seafood company 420 Marine Way P.O. Box 1637 Kodiak, AK 99615 Telephone: (907) 486 -5799 FAX: (907) 466 -4079 March 20, 1992 DISTRICT ENGINEER U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT P.O. Box 898 Anchorage, AK 99506 -0898 ATTN: Regulatory Branch RE: PROPOSED DOCK ADDITION Gentlemen: Attached is our application for construction of a 70' x 103' addition to an existing dock. This permit is in addition to Permit. #2- 880598 dated 12/28/88. The original permit for the present dock and fill was approved during 1971 -72. I do not have permit numbers available for present dock. JM:jc Sincerely, �AMES .J Superint. RECEIVED r MAR 2 31992 REGULATORY FUNCTJONS BRANCH Alaska District, Corps of Engineers Packers of East Point canned Pacific Shrimp, fresh Pacific Oysters, Alaskan Salmon, Halibut and Frozen King, Snow, and Dungeness Crab. 45' 103' CONCRETE DECK LEV: L 20. H.W. 1.0 EXISTIN111AX MHW 78 if FILL MLW l 0 STEEL PILES GROUND EXISTING GROUND p 20 40 VERTICAL 0 50 100 HORIZONTAL NEAR ISLAND VICINITY MAP 0 600 - 1200 SCALE IN FEET ear Island Channel 2 M- 880594' SCALE IN FEET SECTION A PROPERTY LINE EXISTING TRANSIENT LOAT PROPOSED DOCK 1 PLAN PURPOSE: EXPANDED DOCK FACILITIES DATUM: MLLW NATIONAL OCEAN SURVEY ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: O1 CITY OF KODIAK O INTERNATIONAL BOX 1397 SEAFOODS OF ALASKA KODIAK, ALASKA 612 MARINE WAY KODIAK, ALASKA �2 QUEEN FISHERIES SyA�9 C1S 0 0 100 200 V i ! SCALE IN FEET PROPOSED DOCK ADDITION IN: NEAR ISLAND CHANNEL AT: KODIAK, ALASKA APPLICATION BY: QUEEN FISHERIES D /B /A EAST POINT SEAFOODS P.O. BOX 1637 KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 Same Letter Sent To: Mr. Ted Moninski Office of Management and Budget Division of Governmental Coordination Southcentral Regional Office 3601 C Street, Suite 370 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 -5309 Mr. Richard B. Thompson Alaska Department of Natural Resources Division of Land Southcentral Regional Office Post Office Box 107005 Anchorage, Alaska 99510 -7005 Svend Brandt - Erichsen, Regional Administrator Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 3601 C Street, Suite 1350 Anchorage, Alaska 99503, David McGillivary, Field Supervisor U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Service Anchorage 605 West 4th Avenue, Room 62 Anchorage;_ Alaska 99501 Ronald J. Morris, Western Alaska Ecological Supervisor National Marine Fisheries Service 222 West Seventh Avenue, No. 43 Anchorage, Alaska 99513 Mr. Dan Robison, Jr. Alaska Operations Office Environmental Protection Agency 222 West Seventh Avenue, No. 19 Anchorage, Alaska 99513 -7588 Lance Trasky, Regional Supervisor Habitat Division, Region II Alaska Department of Fish and Game 333 Raspberry Road Anchorage, Alaska 99518 -1599 Dr. Steven T. Zimmerman, Chief Protected Resources Management Division National Marine Fisheries Service Post Office Box 2 -1668 Juneau, Alaska 99802 -1668 OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET DIVISION OF GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION SOUTHCENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE 3601 "C' Street . SUITE 370 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503 -2798 PHONE: (907) 561 -6131 FAX: (9071 561 -6134 Certified Mail. Return Receipt Requested East Point Seafoods P.O. Box 1637 Kodiak, AK 99815 Attn: Mr. James Major Dear Mr. Major: CENTRAL OFFICE P.O. BOX AW JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811-0165 PHONE: (9071 465 -3562 FAX: (907) 465 -3075 WALTER J. NICKEL, GOVERNOR NORTHERN REGIONAL OFFICE 675 SEVENTH AVENUE STATION H FAIRBANKS, ALASKA 99701 -4596 PHONE: (9071 451 -2818 FAX: (907) 451 -2814 October 22, 1991 D 1110111 III OCT 241991 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEVEL J SUBJECT: CONCLUSIVE CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION EAST POINT SEAFOODS NPDES PUBLIC NOTICE NO. AK- 000042 -6 STATE I.D. NUMBER AK910827 -21A The Division of Governmental Coordination (DGC) has completed coordinating the state's review of your project for consistency with the Alaska Coastal Management Program (ACMP). On October 7, 1991 you were issued a proposed consistency finding. The project entails the discharge of up to 1,000,000 gallons per-.day of wastewater from the processing- of bottomfish, halibut, crab, herring, and salmon to Near Island Channel. According to the Draft - NPDES permit for this processor, the treatment of the wastewater prior to discharge shall be accomplished through the use. of fine mesh (1 millimeter) screening or equivalent technology. Seafood wastes shall not be pulverized, chopped, ground,, or otherwise altered prior . to screening. This conclusive consistency determination, developed under 6 AAC 50, applies to the following state-and federal authorizations. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT NO. AK- 000042 -6 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION SECTION 401 CERTIFICATE OF REASONABLE ASSURANCE Mr. Major 2 October 22, 1991 East Point Seafoods AK910827 -21A Based on the review of your project by the Alaska Departments of Natural Resources, Environmental Conservation, and Fish and Game, and the Kodiak Island ,Borough, the state concurs with your certification that the project is consistent with the ACMP provided the following conditions are met: 1. Part I.A.3.d shall be added and read as follows: Monitoring results for process wastewater shall be reported on the monthly Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) as both pollutant concentrations (mg /1) and loading values (lbs. pollutant per 1,000 lbs. raw product). 2. Part I.A.4. shall be changed to require receiving water inspections to be conducted on a daily basis instead of weekly. These stipulations will appear on the Section 401 Certificate of Reasonable Assurance to be issued by DEC. These stipulations are necessary to ensure the proposed activity is consistent with the Air, Land, and Water Quality Standards of the ACMP (6 AAC 80.140). Copies of the pertinent ACMP Standards are enclosed. This conclusive consistency determination represents a consensus reached between you as the project applicant and the reviewing agencies listed above, as provided for under 6 AAC 50.070(k). As also provided under 15 CFR 930.64(c), federal authorization of your Project will be made with the full understanding that your original project proposal has been modified subject to the conditions described above. If changes to the approved project are proposed prior to or during ' its siting, construction, or operation, you are required to contact this office immediately to determine if further review and approval of the revised project is necessary. The state reserves the right to enforce compliance with this conclusive consistency determination if the project is changed in any significant way, or if the actual use differs from the approved use contained in the project description. If appropriate, the state may amend the state approvals listed in this conclusive consistency determination. By a copy of this letter we are informing the US Army Corps of Engineers of our determination: Please be advised that although the State has found your project consistent with the ACMP, based on your project description and any stipulations contained herein, you are still required to meet all applicable State and federal laws and regulations. Your Mr. Major 3 October 22, 1991 East Point Seafoods AK910827 -21A consistency determination may include reference to specific laws and regulations, but this in no way precludes your responsibility to comply with other applicable laws and regulations. If you have questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 561 -6131. Sincerely, i46).1 Elizabeth A. Benson Project Review Coordinator Enclosure cc: Distribution List Harold Geren, EPA, Seattle SEM OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET DIVISION OF GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION SOUTHCENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE CENTRAL OFFICE 3601 'C- Street P.O. BOX AW SUITE 370 JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811 -0165 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503 -2798 PHONE: (907) 465 -3562 PHONE: (907) 561 -6131 FAX: (907) 4653075 FAX: (9071 561-6134 Certified Mail October 7, Return Receipt Requested East Point Seafoods P.O. Box 1637 Kodiak, AK 99615 Attn: Mr. James Major Dear Mr. Major: SUBJECT: PROPOSED CONSISTENCY FINDING EAST POINT SEAFOODS NPDES_PUBLIC-NOTICE- NO.._AK- 000042 -6 STATE I.D. NUMBER AK910827 -21A WALTER J. NICKEL, GOVERNOR NORTHERN REGIONAL OFFICE 675 SEVENTH AVENUE STATION H FAIRBANKS, ALASKA 99701 -4596 PHONE: (907) 451 -2818 FAX: (907) 451 -2814 1991 The Division of Governmental Coordination (DGC) is currently coordinating the state's review of your project for consistency with the Alaska Coastal Management Program (ACMP) and has developed this proposed consistency finding based on reviewers' comments. The project entails the discharge of up to 1,000,000 gallons per day of wastewater from the processing of bottomfish, halibut, crab, herring, and salmon to Near Island Channel. According to the Draft NPDES permit for this processor, the treatment of the wastewater prior to discharge shall be accomplished through the use of fine mesh (1 millimeter) screening or equivalent technology. Seafood wastes shall not be pulverized, chopped, -ground, or otherwise altered prior to screening. This proposed consistency finding, developed under 6 AAC 50, applies to the following state and federal authorizations. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT NO. AK- 000042 -6 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION SECTION 401 CERTIFICATE OF REASONABLE ASSURANCE Based on the review of your project by the Alaska Departments of Natural Resources, Environmental Conservation, and Fish and Game, Mr. Major 2 October 7, 1991 STATE I.D. NO. AK910827 -21A and the Kodiak Island .Borough, the state concurs with your certification that the project is consistent with the ACMP provided the following conditions are met: 1. Part I.A.3.d shall be added and read as follows: Monitoring results for process wastewater shall be reported on the monthly Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) as both pollutant concentrations (mg /1) and loading values (lbs. pollutant per 1,000 lbs." raw product). �+ 2. Part I.A.4. shall be changed to require receiving water inspections to be conducted on a daily basis instead of weekly. - r— These stipulations will appear on the Section 401 Certificate of fl 5� W11$4$46416 Assurance to be issued by DEC. These stipulations are j(' .necessary�'t'o ensure the proposed activity is consistent with the flf .Air,. Land,;,and Water Quality Standards of the ACMP (6 AAC 80.140). (,s,s CCopies ofithe pertinent ACMP Standards are enclosed. 77571eese contact me within five days of your receipt of this proposed „,_?finding to indicate whether or not you concur with this finding. If'you are not prepared to concur within the five -day period, you may either: (a) request an extension of the review schedule, if you need more time to consider this finding, or (b) request that the state reconsider this finding, by submitting a written statement requesting "elevation" of the finding, describing your concerns, and proposing as alternative consistency finding, This alternative finding must demonstrate how your project is consistent with the. referenced standards of the ACMP and district policies without the 'stipulations included in this proposed finding. If I do not receive your request for extension or an elevation statement from you, or any other reviewing party with elevation . rights as per 6 AAC 50.070(j), within five days of receipt of this letter, this proposed finding-will be issued as a final conclusive consistency determination. . By copy of, this letter, we are informing the Environmental Protection Agency of our proposed finding. Please be advised that although the State has found your project consistent with the ACMP, based on your project description and any stipulations contained herein, you are still required to meet all Mr. Major 3 October 7, 1991 STATE I.D. NO. AK910827 -21A applicable State and federal laws and regulations. Your consistency determination may include reference to specific laws and regulations, but this in no way precludes your responsibility to comply with other applicable laws and regulations. If you have questions regarding this process, please contact me at 561 -6131. a' Sincerely, Elizabeth A. Benson Project Review Coordinator Enclosure cc: Distribution List Harold Geren, EPA, Seattle i KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH October 7, 1991 DISTRIBUTION LIST Ms. Judith Bittner, Department of Natural Resources, Division of Parks, Anchorage Mr. Tan Brooks, Manager, Civil Engineerng Alaska Railroad Corporation, Anchorage Ms. Veronica Gilbert, Department of Natural Resources, Anchorage Mr. Pete Panarese, Department of Nature Resources, Anchorage Ms._ Carol Sarver, Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, Anchorage Ms. Elaine Pistoresi, Department of Environmental Conservation, Anchorage .Mr. Lance Trasky, Department of Fish and Game, Anchorage Ms. Linda Freed, Kodiak Island Borough Mr. Uwe L. Gross, Koniag Inc., Anchorage Mr. Gordon Puller, Kodiak Arera Native Association, Kodiak The Honorable Jerome Selby, Mayor of Kodiak MEMORANN''i) �)UM TO: Elizabeth Benson Project Review Coordinator Division of Governmental Coordination Office of Management and Budget n FROM: C. Wa ne Dolezal Habitat Biologist Region II Habitat Division Department of Fish and Game State 61. Alaska Department of Fish and Game DATE: October 2, 1991 FILE NO: TELEPHONE NO: 267 -2284 SUBJECT: East =Point =Seafoods ' NP.DES =Permi-t -No. AK- 000042 -6 Seafood Process Waste Discharge SID AK910827 -21A The Alaska Department of Fish and Game has reviewed the wastewater discharge permit application referenced above. The project entails the discharge of up to 1,000,000 gallons per day of wastewater from the processing of bottomfish, halibut, crab, herring and salmon to Near Island Channel. We understand that treatment of the wastewater prior to discharge shall be accomplished through the use of fine mesh (1 millimeter) screening or equivalent technology.. Further, seafood wastes shall not be pulverized, chopped, ground or otherwise altered prior to screening. We have no objection to the project as proposed. Pursuant to 6 AAC 80.010(b), the ADF &G recommends that this project be found consistent with the Standards of the Alaska Coastal Management Program and the Kodiak Island Borough Coastal Management Program. We appreciate the opportunity to comment. If you have any specific questions, please contact me at 267 -2333. cc: D. Kohler, COE R. Dolan, DEC J. Jett, DNR /DL P. Probasco, ADF &G L. Schwarz, ADF &G L. White, ADF &G D. McGillivary, USFWS P. North, EPA B. Smith, NMFS L. Freed, Kodiak Island Borough Kodiak Island Borough Elizabeth Benson, Project Coordinator OMB -DGC Southcentral. Regional Office 3601 C Street, Suite 370 Anchorage, AK 99503 710 MILL BAY ROAD KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340 PHONE (907) 486-5736 RE: SID AK 910827 -21A - East Point Seafoods NPDES AK-000042 -6 Dear Ms. Benson: September 22, 1991 The Kodiak Island Borough has reviewed the seafood processing facility discharge permit referenced above. We support the issuance of the permit as long as state water quality standards are met. For the record, the Kodiak Island Borough does not have the expertise to review the technical aspects of the permit. Seafood processing is a significant contributor to economic activity in the Kodiak Island Borough. Based on our limited review of the permit application, the Kodiak Island Borough recommends that this permit be found consistent with the Kodiak Island Borough Coastal Management Program (KIBCMP) and the Alaska Coastal Management Program (ACMP). If you have any questions about these comments, please call me. 0 Sincerely, Linda Freed, Director Community Development Department cc: W. Dolezal, ADF &G V. Gilbert, ADNR B. Lamoreaux, ADEC James Major, East Point Seafoods Ray Camardella, KIB Engineering/Facilities Dept. @IDU 'AUG 3 0 1991 ' COMMUNITY DEVELOP DEC DEG ONE COE - flak PROJECT TITLE: i (MU OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET DIVISION OF GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION )RO.iECT INFORMATION SHEET ,1 /JPpaS gel S f .Qahe.4 SOLDI CENTRAL REGIONAL C xm -C sane SUITE 210 ANCHORAGE. ALASKA 6950 34 wove (90n 1e14171 STATE LD. NUMBER: (►59108 Z1- Z.1 A DGC CONTACT: rave& 2tfl5401, Phone 561-6131 Pa 561-6134 APPLICANT/PROPONENT: art Ahefr S42/LA Agent ‘rirnts 44fa Phone art8/r.5799 Fa' DIRECT FEDERAL ACTION: YES NO REVIEW TYPE: CONSISTENCY L/ ANILCA ACTIVITY TYPE: ARMED FORCES COMMERCIAL LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN_ MINING: HARDROCL PLACER OFFSHORE OII.AGAS PUBLIC UTILITIES/FACILMES PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL PUS PLACEMENT FLOATING STRUCTURES A FISHERIES PRODUCTION: GENERAL HATCHERY REMOTE RELEASE ENHANCEMENT AQUATIC FARMS a/WaU SHELLFISH_ AQUATIC PLANTS_ HYDRO POWER TIMBER OTHER Neatest Coastal District ltat.G 2 LtsJ anif 9�., Pita Inside the District Boundary Yes y No V District Plan Approved Yes v No REVIEW 1■I1LES'TONES: Day 1 Tat at 111 199 I Reviewer Regt& for Add'1 Info t , �r1 -. 1 1 49 1 Comment Due To DGC 1n c +. - , 19 91 Nodficadon To Appli ncf. 1 1 I Y 9 1 Decision Deadline . Z. 31 19 91 REVIEW SCHEDULE: 15 DAY 30 DAY 50 DAY OTHER Coastal Project Questionnaire and Certifcatioit't'at j'etso Plate an all questions. Include maps or plan drawings with you¢ y ,a COMPLIANCE BRA SOWING qutsdaaaaue may be returned and will delay the review d�yt ourr QttskstWION 10 • AnuCAIrT INFORMATION Fast Point•Seafuods Nun iak AK Sus C�(907) 486 -5799 Uaydne Phew PUOJZCT INFORMATION / James Major Cana Pas P.O. Box 1637 Adana 99615 Kodiak Zip coda City (907) 486 -5799 Oaytina Phoaa AK Stan 99615 Zip Code Provide a brief Sciadoa of your project and NPDFS Renewal fi etc.): Starting Dace fa Prof." Ealing Date for Project PROJECT LOCATION • 1. Pleats give location of project. (Include nearest community or identifiable body of land a war.) Kodiak. Alaska/Near Island Charnel Tawnahip Meidi= Minot Pan` - USGS Map- 2- Is the project on: ( /Law oath alit /1 State tad Pant Land Pram Land X Municipal Land 3. Project is located in which region of tpe state (see attached map): Nerdrara Soatroamd Soaks CURRt T AMPROVALS 1. Do you ammedy have any State or federal approvals fa this project? If yes. pleas list below. Et ❑ (Nape appwasi means patois a any other form of sudwaiaaoa.) Litt state review ID*, if any. Aoeevaa Tns Aptstoval • Expiration Dam State ID* NPDES #AK- 000042 -6 4/29/91 MENAI. APPROVALS Will you be placing saucnnes or fills in any of the following: tidal wan. • streams, lakes. or wedandaa? • !l yo• av wroain r Arts your nand proMrr anus fur a .'alaaa can W U.S. Cans al Emireara. RenalIt a (401)73347704W • ■ eal annalariaa If par an awash; Oa A.cMrga S aa8 mil AN 14034714712. ru- 000042 -6 If yes. have you applied fa or do you intend to apply for a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers y Yea No !'t t v t t4 • r. -` 2. Raw you far a.do you inroad to apply tar a U.S. FavQOOmeanr$x ecaaa Agency Y Nuioal Poittsdoa Dlgchap Olmitiaan Sys= (NPOES) peswM Please indicate a right and sive darn of submittal (Note: For informaesoa reWding the need for a NPDES permit. contact EPA at 271 - 5083.) 3. Have you applied for of do you intend to apply for permits Otto any other federal agency? If yes, please US babe. A e ea t Approval Tvoe Dam submitted (or intend to submit) Yn DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES APPROVALS 1. Is the proposed project on state -owned land or will you need to cross stare Dods fa access? Naas Is -a— r ter care/ ea* as ass Sari anialicrial ow a a s aN sailer se lira q'v .. , ant. a Sam AgAride IS seared for vwr ewers . 2. Is any pardon of yea project placed below the ordinary high wart line of a stream river, lab, or man high wain line of a saltwater body? 3. Will you be (bulging? If yes. location of dredging is: Twusp Rasp Meridian Secdte • Loestnnt of disposal site fa dredged materials (desaibe): Ttnesitip Rap Meridian S___ 4. Will you be &ling with rook, sand or gravel? If yes, amount? • Cortina of source: Township Reap Meridiem • Location al fill sire: Tawetip Rang Mechlin 5. Do you plan to use any of the following state-owned resources? Timber • Will you be harvesting timber from 10 or tome saes? If yes, amount? . Leaden of source:Towetip Rapp meridim Smites Other Materials • If yea, what ream W? (pso, Mai rs•, rile wweudea, er=r Seale Scam • L 'casloo of saace:Towutlp Rani 6 Are you *min a um any bush water? . UM among (Poops pa day)? 1, 000,000 ▪ SOtnp? Kodiak Municipal 7. you be building a along a dam? 8. Do you plat to drill a geothermal well? .9. Will you be exploring for or extracting coal? times Sachs 2Sggir OCT 2A 1990 WATER Pasii■S & COMPUgt;CE BRANCH EPA • A[OMON JO —. 10. Will you be exploring for or extracting minerals on stare -owned land? 11. Wiill you be exploring fa or extracting oil and gas on state-owned land? Air - 000042.6 E3 CI CI CZI Ya . No ❑C O a O 12. Will you be investigating or removing historical or archaeological recourses on stare -owned land? 13. Will the project be located in a aunnit of the Alaska State Park System? If you answered NO le ell anion In this section you do not end an Munn' from the asks Dsp dins et Mini Raines (DNR). Continue to the a action. 0 h El Ca If yes sea ar7 e YU AN terms this seedae, contact DNIt to Ideedfy and Haled on your discussion with DNR. please list ( below) the approval type needed and date submitted Anon' Ti s DaStsiwl(a bad tosail) Have you paid the filing tens required for the DNR permits? ❑ If you we not applying far DNR permits. indicate reason below: a. Jeanetto (DNR contact) told ma on 8/9/90 (dace) that no DNR approvals or permits were required on this project. b. Other. DEPARTMENT OP FMB AND GAME APPROVALS 1. WW you be working in estrum, river. or lake? (This includes work in running wan or zee ice, within the adve floodplain, on islands. the 'face of the barb, or the scram tidelands down to man low ode.) Name of steam or rivet Will you be doing any of the following: a) Building a dam, river training structure or inseam impoundment? Name of lairs: b) Using the wane:? c) Diverting or altering the natural channel stream? a IDITogg37 NIL) d) Mandator damming the stream. (temporarily or permanently)? 0 C T 2 •1 l yy u ❑ e) Changing the wan flow or the water channel? f) Pumping was out of the steam or lake? g) Inna�y tkik pawl. tack petroleum products, debris, cheaaeals or wastes of any type trio elle wesee't h) Using the see= as a toed (even when frozen),.ce aysaing the stream with racked or wheeled which, log- dragging or esavedon equipment (baboon. bulldozers, etc.)? i) Mewing a stabklielsg the banb? )� Mk ring ce digging in doe beds or banks? k) Using expletives? kR _ 000042 - 6 I) Building a bridge (including an ice bridge)? m) Installing a culvert or other drur,a ie sr crac? WATER PERMITS 8 COMrLIANCE BRANCC EPA - REGION 10 CI ISC 0 C n) Constructing a weir? o) Other is -stream structure not mentioned above? SCI-41721) OCT 211990 WATER PERMITS & COMPLIANCE BRANCH EPA - REGION 10 2. b your ptojact l'- -1 is a designated Stue Game Refuge, Critical Habitat Area. or State Game ' Sanctuary/ 3. Does your project Iaelude the eansaucdon and operadoa of a salmon hatchery? 4. Dar yoga project sffxt or is it related to a previously permitted salmon hatchery? • 5. Does your project include the cassattction of a shellfish or sea vegetable farm? If you answered NO to of Fish and Game (DFG). Continue to the nos sepetion. from the Alaska Department V you answered YES to any of the questions under 1 or 2, contact the Regional DFG Habitat Division Office for Information and application tortes. If you answered YES to questions 3, 4 or 5, contact the DFG Private Nonprofit Hatchery Offla at the FALD. divhdon headquarter for informed= and application forms. Based on your discussion with DM, please list (below) the approval type needed and date submitted Wont Dm Dar Sadist (at Breda arum Ya N0 a 13 Ya No CI OM CI El a® If you are not applying for permits. indicate reason below: • • ' Wavtie Dolezal (DFG contact) told toe on 7/31/90 (date) that no DFG approvals or permits were required on this project. b. Other. DEPARTMENT O/ ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION APPROVALS 1. Will a discharge et wastewater from induscral or commercial operations occur? (See #2 in.'Tede al Approvals" section) 2. Do you intend to coarauctMsatall or modify any part of a wastewater (sewage or gteywaors) disposal sysma? 3. If yes, will the discharge be 500 gpd or greater! 4. Do yam eaxpan to sago s a nixing zone far your prdposed project? If yam wee dame A aced Aladv water quality saaada& yea may apply fora alma ear. Use. pas arsteea f= b diets otartatioa !equated anew 1t AAC 70.032. 5. Wif the Fujaet Halt in dredging or disposal of fill in wetlands or placement of a WW.-'ao in wameways? (Nona: yogaapp!!canon for this activity to the Caps of Engineers will also serve as yoga application to DEC.) 6. WIU your project result in the development of a cuetendy =permitted facility far the disposal a[ domestic or industrial solid waste? 7. vim your project require the application of oil or pesticides to the surface of the land? Ax- 000042 -8 EV IN i (1 Y 8. Wm your project soave air etais utter from the following: a) Dismal parson n totaling mom than 10.000 hp? b) Other fossil !'laaI ad electric geaauar. fiance, or boiler totaling greater than 10•031 ha a, 9,900 IcWb. err 100.000.000 balit ? c) Asphik >y d) raeimraasr burning trans than 1000 lbs. pct a) Industrial pt's? WATER PERYIIS d :QMF(ur;CE BRANCH 9. Will you be altering a public water system? EPA • REGION 10 10. WIII yaw paojaa mgmse offshore drilling or vessel tranrpott of ail. err other petiole= padre es carps or include =Acre facilities with as effective storage capacity d peaty than 10.000 bare d loch products . 11. Will you be mbdividiag Lode into two or an loo (parcels)? ❑ a It yaw amend NO to all qqmentions in this section, you do not nerd a permit tae apprvnl from the Alaska Departnunt of Environmental Conservation (DEC% Plan aloes= to the oat section. IS you aoawered YES lo any of these quesdons (sat 06 Nara), Waterer the DEC Reglaad - Offlm for lnformadoo and application forsaa. - Tel No ED DI] ❑ E ❑O r Hated to your discussion with DEC, please list (below) the approval type needed and dam submitted. Arr.! bl• I)a.. Sulam: (a Sail o aa.ai) If you ate not applying for permits, indicate teasca below: a.. (DEC contact) told me on (dale) that no DEC swarth or wain wale requited co this project. . _Z..b.peal Geoc'P W%isnii 9 /iS /90 - &PT1FS EPA _Penal t Reauiced Certification Statement The informed= eotatailltod herein is Rue and complete to the bat of my lmowledge. I certify that with, sad will be conducted in a mennesrc ons stoat with, the Alaska AK- 000042 -6 ,D /a 3/70 Den Nee 71tb agar t ... es tgeieanem fee f.aw.t peas was Pank wails andan. . Cf dr .it! alga .dada' M a n equaed to mo=ue a fan msa._n detmoce car 15 CFR 430. Saps C. To compute your packet, please attach your state permit applladoaa and copies of your federal permit applications to this questionnaire United States Environmental Protection Agency - Region 10 Park Place Building, 13th Floor 1200 Sixth Avenue, WD -134 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206)• 553 -1214 NOTICE OF PROPOSED REISSUANCE OF NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMITS TO DISCHARGE TO WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES, • NOTICE OF STATE CERTIFICATION, AND NOTICE OF STATE DETERMINATION OF CONSISTENCY WITH THE ALASKA COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Public Notice No.: AK- 000043 -3, AK- 000083 -3, AR- 600036 -1, AK- 000042 -6, AK- 000008 -6, AK- 000035 -3, AE- 002666 -2, AK- 000049 -3, AK- 000082 -5 Public Notice Issuance Date: Ault 5, 1991 Public Notice Expiration Date: goptimbt 3, 1991 1. applicant The following Kodiak seafood processors have applied for reissuance of their National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits to discharge process wastewater into St. Paul Harbor and Near Island Channel. These waters are classified by the Alaska State Water Quality Standards as class 2A, 28, 2C, and 20 for use in aquaculture, seafood processing, and industrial water supply; contact and seconder, water recreation; growth and propagation of fish, shellfish,-aquatic life and wildlife; and harvesting for the consumption of raw mollusks or other raw aquatic life. Fact sheets are available. 1. Alaska Pacific Seafoods, Inc. P.O. Box 31179 Seattle, Wa. 98103 Application No. AK- 000043 -4 2. All Alaskan Seafoods, Inc.(Star of Kodiak) P.O. Box 646 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Application No. AK- 000083 -3 3. All itaskan Seafoods, Inc.(Alkod) 101 Marine Way Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Application No. AK- 000036 -1 Page 2 4. East Point Seafood company Building C -3, Fisherman's Terminal Seattle, Wa. 98119 Application No. AK- 000042 -6 5. Faros Seafoods, Inc. 325 Shelikof Street Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Application No. AK- 000008 -6 6. International Seafoods of Ala P.O. Box 2997 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Application No. AK- 000035 -3 7. International Seafoods of Alaska, Inc'. P.O. Box 2997 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Application No. AK- 002666 -2 8. King Crab, Inc. P.O. Box C -70739 Seattle, Wa. 98107 Application No. AK- 000049 -3 9. Western Alaska' Fisheries, Inc. 1111 3rd Avenue, Suite 1210 Seattle, Wa 98101 Application No. AK- 000082 -5 Inc. 2. Tentative Determination The Region 10 Office of the EPA has tentatively determined to reissue a discharge permit to the above listed applicants. 3. State Certification This Notice will also serve as Public Notice of the intent of the State of Alaska, Department of'Environmental Conservation to consider certifying that the subject discharge will comply with the applicable provisions of Section 208(e), 301, 301, 303, 306 and 307 of the Clear Water Act. The' NPDES permit will not be issued until the certification requirements of Section 401 have been met. 4. State Consistency Determination This Notice will also serve as Public Notice of the intent of the State of Alaska, Office of Management and Budget, Division of Governmental Coordination, to review this action for consistency wit] the approved Alaska Coastal Management Program. 5. Page 3 public carat■ Persons wishing to comment on the tentative determinations contained in the proposed permit or wishing to request that a public hearing be held, may do so in writing, within 30 days of the date of this public notice. A request for a public hearing shall state the nature of the issues to be raised as well as the requester's name, address and telephone number. Comments must be received within this 30 day peria to be considered in the formulation of final determinations regarding the application. All comments should include the name, address and telephone number of the commenter and a concise statement of the exact basis of any comment and the relevant facts upon which it is based. All written comments and requests should be submitted to EPA at the above address to the attention of the Director, Water Division. Persons wishing to comment on State Certification should submit written comments within this 30 day period to the State of Alaska, Southcentral Regional Office, Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC), 3601 'C' Street, suite 1334, Anchorage, Alaska 99503. Persons wishing to comment on the State Determination of Consistency with the Alaska Coastal Management Program should submit written comments within this 30 day period, to the State of Alaska, Southcentral Regional Office, office of Management and Budget, Division of Governmental Coordination, 3601 'C' Street, Suite 370, Anchorage, Alaska 99503. Comments should be addressed to the attention of Alaska Coastal Management Program Consistency Review. Administrative Record The proposed NPDES permit and other related documents are on file and may be inspected at the above address any time between 8:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Copies . and other information may b requested by writing to the EPA at the above address to the attention of the Water Permits Section, or by calling (206) 553 -1214. This material is also available from the EPA Alaska Operations Office, Roc 537, Federal Building, 222 West 7th Avenue, #19, Anchorage, Alaska 99513. FACT SHEET United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 10 Park Place Building, 13th Floor 1200 Sixth Avenue, WD -134 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 553 -1214 Date: AUG 0 5 1991 Permit No.: AR- 000042 -6 PROPOSED REISSUANCE OF A NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT TO DISCHARGE POLLUTANTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT (CWA) EAST POINT SEAFOOD COMPANY has applied for reissuance of a NPDES permit to discharge pollutants pursuant to the provisions of the CWA. This Fact Sheet includes (a) the tentative determination of the EPA to reissue the permit, (b) information on public comment, public hearing and appeal procedures, (c) the description of the current discharge, (d) a listing of tentative effluent limitations, schedules of compliance and other conditions, and (e) a sketct or detailed description of the discharge location. We call your special attention to the technical material presented in the latter part-of this document. Persons wishing to comment on the tentative determinations contained in tht proposed permit reissuance may do so by the expiration date of the Public Notice. All written comments should be submitted to EPA as described in • the Public Comments Section of the attached Public Notice. After the expiration date of the Public Notice, the Director, Water Division, will make final determinations with respect to the permit reissuance. The tentative determinations contained in the draft permit will become final conditions if no substantive comments are received durinc the public notice period. The permit will become effective 30 days after the final determinations are made, unless a request for an evidentiary hearing is submitted within 30 days after receipt of the final determinations. The proposed NPDES permit and other related documents are on file and may be inspected at the above address any time between 8:30.a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. Copies and other information may be requested -by writing to EPA at the above address to.,the attention of the Water Permits Section, orby calling (206) 553 -1214. This material is also available from the EPA Alaska Operations Office, Room 537, Federal Building, 222 W. 7th.Avenue, 119, Anchorage, Alaska 99513. Page 2 Technical Information Z. Applicant East Point Seafood Company P.O. Box 1637 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 -1637 NPDES Permit No. AK- 000042 -6 Facility Contact: James Major, Plant Manager II. activity East Point Seafood Company operates a seafood processing facilit: in Kodiak, Alaska. Seafood is processed, year round with a maximum production of 112.5 short tons per day of raw seafood. The expected maximum production of each species to be processed is as follows: Species Maximum Daily Production (short tonsldavl (PoundslDav) Salmon 65 130,000 Herring 62.5 125,000 Black Cod 90 180,000 Halibut 112.5 225,000 Redfish 112.5 125,000 Pollock 100 200,000 True Cod 112.5 225,000 Dungeness Crab 50 100,000 Red King Crab • 75 150;000 Blue King Crab 75 150,000 Brown King Crab 75 150,000 Bairdi Crab 50- 100 -,000 Opolio Crab 37.5 75,000 Flatfish 112.5 125,000 Shark 100 200,000 Sea Urchin 5 10,000 Shrimp 28 96,000 Page 3 gec.ivina Waters A. Near Island Channel, Alaska B. Near Island Channel, Alaska is classified by the Alaska State Water Quality Standards as Classes (2)(A)(i)(ii)(iii) (B)(i)(ii),(C) and (D) for use in aquaculture, seafood processing and industrial water supply, contact and . secondary water recreation, growth and propagation of fish, shellfish, other aquatic life and wildlife, and harvesting for the consumption of raw mollusks or other raw aquatic life. C. The state water quality parameters which could, be affected by the discharge are dissolved gas, pH, turbidity, oil and grease, residual chlorine, total suspended solids and settleable solids. IV. Background A. The original NPDES permit was issued to East Point Seafood Co., effective June 2, 1975 and expiring May 31, 1980. The NPDES permit was reissued to East Point Seafood, Co. effective October 30, 1980 . and expiring October 30, 1985. East Point Seafood Co.,, was issued their current permit, effective April 29, 1986 and expiring April 29,1991. The applicant has been operating under the terms and condition: of this permit, as allowed. in 40 CFI Part 122.6. On October 24,1990, EPA received a complete NPDES permit application from East Point Seafood Co. for a permit to discharge to Near Island Channel, Alaska. B. Existing industrial treatment includes screening process wastewater. The screened effluent is discharged to St. Paul Harbor. The screened solids are collected and transported, to Kodiak Reduction, Inc. (KRI). In February 1984, the reduction facility was 'closed, with. intent to reopen after reconstruction in March 1986. During this period of inactivity, solid wastes were barged to a designated seafoo dumping zone in Chiniak Bay. In March 1990, the reduction facility again closed down operations for a period of four months, wastes were-again barged to the seafood dumping zom for disposal. C. Process water, obtained from the City of Kodiak, is chlorinated prior to use by East Point Seafood Co.. D. Sanitary wastes are discharged to the Kodiak City municipal treatment plant. Page .4 The facility maintains one industrial outfall line,' located 50 from shore at a depth of 28 feet below the water surface. Screened effluent is discharged through the outfall with a daily flow of 1,000,000 gallons. Pollutants associated with the discharge are primarily conventional and include pH, total suspended solids, and oil and grease. ' V. Basis of Limitation and Monitorina Requirements A. There are three modifications in the, proposed permit which differ significantly from the previously issued NPDES permit. 1. All solid wastes will be disposed of at a by- product reduction facility. 2. When effluent limitation guidelines (40 CFR 408.202) were established the bottomfish industry in Alaska was primarily halibut, which is brought to the processing facility gutted. The product was headed and frozen and shipped out in that condition. The effluent from this process was quite low in pollutants. In the past several years a new bottomfish industry has emerged in Alaska. Halibut is no longer the dominant bottomfish species processed. Bottomfish such as cod pollock, and flatfish are harvested in large quantities. These species are usually brought to the plant whole, where the fish are mechanically butchered. Today's processing of bottomfish involves more extensive butchering and mechanization, therefore it has been determined that Non - Alaskan Mechanized Bottomfish Processing (40 CFR 408.222) more accurately reflect current seafood processing operations. 3. Monitoring residual chlorine is required to assess the impacts of this pollutant in the receiving environment. 4. Not grinding seafood wastes prior to screening was a requirement of the previous permit. To clarify the intent of this requirement the wording has been modified to the following: Seafood wastes shall not be pulverized, ground, chopped or otherwise altered prior to screening. Page S B. The effluent limitations for the screened wastewater from finfish processing are based on Alaskan Hand Butchered Salmon Processing (40 CPR 408.162), Non - Alaskan Mechanized Bottomfish Processing (40 CFR 408.222), Alaskan Bottomfish Processing (40 CFR 408.202), Non - Remote Alaskan Whole Crab and Crab Sections Processing (40 CFR 408.62), and, Non- Remote Alaskan Shrimp Processing guidelines (40 CFR 408.92). When more then one species is processed on a sampling day, the effluent limitation for that day is based on the proportion of each species processed. Variable monthly limits are also based on the proportion of each species processed. EPA has determined that this method of determining a variable limit is appropriate, since EPA guidelines (40 CFR 408) are expressed in terms of pounds of pollutant per 1000 pounds of raw product processed. The method to determine the variable limitations and an example calculation are included in Attachments 1 and 2 of the permit. C. No grinding of seafood wastes prior to screening is a best management, practice which carries out the intent of the Clean Water Act of reducing the amount of pollutants ,entering the receiving waters. Limitations on pH, visible environmental impacts, and receiving water accumulations are based on Alaska State Water Quality Standards. These standards apply to all discharges from the facility, including process and non- process waters. E. Monitoring is required pursuant to 40 CFR 122.44 (i) and is necessary for determining compliance with permit effluent limitations and to evaluate potential water quality impacts resulting from the discharge. Monitoring frequencies are based on the Agency's determination of the minimum sampling required to adequately monitor facility performance. Monitoring results will be reported in monthly Discharge Monitoring Reports. P. Total residual chlorine monitoring of process wastewater is required in the proposed permit. Process water is chlorinated prior to use in processing operations for disinfection purposes. Monitoring of residual chlorine in the effluent is required to assess the impacts of this pollutant in the receiving. environment. G. Processing records are necessary to characterize the type and amount of pollutants discharged to Near Island Channel. Page 6 VI. Other Requirements A. Non - process wastewater may be discharged through conveyances other than outfall 001. These wastes include cooling water, boiler water, fresh water pressure relief discharges, and water used in live tanks. This authorization is based on the characteristics of'the wastewater from these activities. These wastewaters are expected to contain relatively.minor concentrations of conventional pollutants (TSS., BOD, oil and grease) and small quantities of solids, are not expected to adversely affect the receiving waters. B. Dive surveys in Petersburg (EPA, 1987) and Kodiak (EPA, 1988) have documented water quality impacts from seafood processing wastes.' In Kodiak, divers observed the presence of anoxic sediments, waste accumulations, and bacterial layers.over a large area (at least 75 meters in length) at the mouth of Gibson Cove. Based on these findings,, an annual dive survey is required in this permit in order to determine compliance with state water quality standards as well as the extent of the impacts on the receiving water due to the discharge of seafood wastes. The dive is scheduled at the end'of the salmon processing season, which is the maximum production period. C. The proposed permit requires all collected solids to be disposed of at a reduction facility. , The solid waste will be used, by the reduction facility, for fishmeal production or barged, by the reduction facility, to a designated ocean dumping zone for disposal. This requirement is necessary to facilitate accurate monitoring of the ocean dumping zone. D.' .Notification of changes in processing capacity is required to assure that the EPA and ADEC are notified. of any potential increases in the amount of pollutants being discharged. This will allow an evaluation of the impact of the increased pollutant loading on the receiving waters. E. The re- opener clause, Part I.8.8, is required pursuant to 40 CFR 122.62. F. Compliance, with Alaska Water Quality Standards is a required condition of the permit pursuant to Section 301 of the Clean Water Act. Permit No.: AK- 000042 -6 Application No.: AK- 000042 -6 • United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 10 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101 AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. S1251 at sea., as amended by the Water Quality Act of 1987, P.L. 100 -4, the "Act" EAST POINT SEAFOOD-COMPANY is authorized to discharge from a seafood processing facility located in Kodiak, Alaska. to receiving . waters named Near Island Channel, Alaska in accordance with discharge point(s), effluent limitations, 'monitoring . requirements and other, conditions set forth herein. This permit shall become effective This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight, Signed this day of Director, Water Division, Region 10 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Page 2 of 20 • Permit No.: AK- 000042 -6 • TABLE OF CONTENTS Cover Sheet--Issuance and Expiration Dates I. Effluent Limitations and Monitoring Requirements A. Specific Limitations and Monitoring Requirements B. Other Requirements C. Definitions II. Monitoring, Recording and Reporting Requirements A. Representative Sampling B. Monitoring Procedures C. Reporting of Monitoring Results D. Additional Monitoring by the Permittee E. Records Contents F. Retention of Records G. Twenty -four Hour Notice of Noncompliance Reporting H. Other Noncompliance Reporting I. Inspection and Entry J. Compliance Schedules III. Compliance Responsibilities A. Duty to Comply B. Penalties for Violations of Permit Conditions C. Need to Halt or Reduce Activity not a Defense D. Duty to Mitigate E. Proper Operation and Maintenance F. Removed Substances G. Bypass *of Treatment Facilities H. Upset Conditions I. Toxic Pollutants IV. General Requirements A. Changes in Discharge of Toxic Substances B. Planned Changes C. Anticipated Noncompliance D. Permit Actions E. Duty to Reapply F. Duty to Provide Information G. Other Information H. Signatory Requirements I. Availability of Reports J. Oil and Hazardous Substance Liability K. Property Rights L. Severability M. Transfers N. State Laws ATTACHMENT 1 ATTACHMENT 2 FIGURE 1 I. Page 3 Of 20 Permit No.: AR- 000042 -6 EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQTJIREMRNTS A. ginfish Processing. During the effective term of this permit, the permittee is authorized to discharge process wastewater from the processing of bottomfish (such as pollock, and cod),halibut, herring, salmon, and crab to Near Island Channel, Alaska through outfall 001. Treatment of process wastewater prior to discharge shall be accomplished through the use of fine mesh screening (1 mm) or equivalent technology. ,Seafood wastes shall not be pulverized, chopped, ground or otherwise altered prior to screening. 1. Processing discharges shall be limited as specified below (limitations are dependent upon the raw products processed on the day Samples are collected): Total Suspended Solids ' Oil and Grease Daily Max. Monthly Avg. Daily Max. Monthly Avg. Species Halibut (and other headed /gutted bottomfish) (lbs /1000 lbs)* Mechanized Hottomfish (lbs /1000 lbs)* 3.1 1.9 4.3 0.56 22 Salmon -Hand 2.6 Butchered, including 'fresh /frozen whole (lbs /1000 lbs)* Mechanized Salmon 44 (lbs /10001bs)* Herring 2.6 Frozen Whole (lbs /1000 lbs)* Shrimp 320 (lbs /10001bs)* Whole Crab and 12 Crab Sections (lbs /1000 lbs)* . Multiple Species "(lbs /1000 lbsl* 12 9.9 3.9 1.6 0.31 0.19 26 29 11 1.6 0.31 0.19 210 51 3.9 1.3 (See Attachement 1) 17 . 0.42 DRAFT Page 4 of 20 Permit No.: AR- 000042 -6 Daily discharges shall be calculated as follows: *lbs pollutant /1,000 lbs raw product (flow. madl X (conc. of pollutant ma /11 X (8.3401 (total lbs processed during the sampling day) NOTE: An example calculation is included in Attachment 2. 2: Environmental Effects - a. The pH shall not be less than 6.5 standard units nor greater than 8.5 standard units. b. ' There shall be no discharge of floating solids, visibl( foam, or oily wastes which produce a sheen on the surface of the receiving water. c. There shall be no 'accumulation of seafood processing wastes on the shoreline. d. There shall be no accumulation of wastes on the bottom of the receiving water. 3. Monitoring requirements.. Effluent monitoring shall be conducted as follows; Parameter Frequency Sample Type Units Flow . Daily 24 -Hour Record mgd TSS Weekly 24 -Hour Composite mg /.1 Oil and Grease* Weekly Grab mg /1 Settleable Weekly 24 -Hour Composite ml /1 Solids Residual Chlorine Weekly pH Weekly Waste Handling Daily System Grab mg /1 Grab Standard Units * Testing to be by Collins /Tenny Method DRAFT Page 5 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000042 -6 a. Samples shall be taken from the effluent stream after treatment and prior to its discharge to the receiving water. b. At least one half of the residual chlorine samples will be taken during or immediately after the plant sanitation procedure. c. Daily flow shall be recorded on the same day effluent samples are taken. 4. Receiving Water Inspections The water surface shall be visually inspected each week for floating solids, garbage, grease, foam and visible oil sheen. Results from these inspections shall be reported with each monthly Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR). 5. Processing Records The permittee shall report daily processing volumes as part of the monthly Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR). The following parameters shall be reported: a. Quantity of raw seafood processed per day, by species (pounds). b. Type and quantity of finished product per day, by species (pounds). c. Estimate of quantity of seafood wastes disposed of via reduction facility (pounds). B. Other Requirements. 1. Sanitary Wastewater Sanitary wastes shall be discharged to the Kodiak municipal treatment facility. The discharge of non - domestic wastewater to the city sanitary wastewater treatment facility is prohibited unless prior approval is obtained from the operator of that facility. 2. Non - Process Wastewater Cooling water, boiler water, freshwater pressure relief discharges, and water used in live tanks may be discharged through conveyances other than outfall 001 provided the limitations in Part I.A.2 are met. DRAFT Page 6 of 20 Permit No.: AR- 000042 -6 3. Dive Surveys Underwater dive surveys at outfa11.001 shall be conducted once per year. Dive surveys shall be conducted within seven days after the termination of salmon processing but no later than October 15. The diver shall inspect the area under the dock.as well as the outfall along its entire length. The permittee shall submit a dive survey report to EPA and ADEC no later than thirty days after each dive. The report shall include.the following information: a. Location (including distance from shore and compass orientation), depth and condition of the outfall line (including presence, size, and location of any breaks or cracks). b. Water depth at the end of the outfall pipe. c. Inspection of the area at the end of the outfall pipe and documentation of the type, depth, areal extent, estimated volume, and sizes of particles of any waste accumulation. d. A plan view drawing (to scale) indicating the location of the dock, outfall pipe, prominent - bottom features such as depressions, pockets, and large rocks, secondary slurry zones, and any area where seafood wastes have accumulated. The drawing shall also include the location, number and species of benthic organisms observed in areas adjacent to the outfall and an indication of whether the organisms observed are alive, dead or stressed. e. Types of substrate in and adjacent to the outfall area. f. Video tape of dive showing all features listed in parts a, c, and d. 4. Waste Disposal Practices a. Disposal of all solid processing wastes., with the exception of waste products listed in part I.B.4.b., shall be to a by- product recovery facility, unless the permittee meets the requirements of part I.B.4.C.. b. Halibut heads, shellfish wastes, and other seafood wastes., as approved by EPA, which are unsuitable for processing at a by- product recovery facility may be disposed of at the ocean dumping zone identified in part I.B.4.d., and figure 1 of this permit. DRAFT. Page 7 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000042 -6 The permittee may submit a written request, to EPA, to have a species of fish classified as unsuitable for processing at a by- product recovery facility. If EPA approves the permittee's request and classifies a species of fish as unsuitable for processing at a by- product recovery facility, that classification shall remain in effect for the term of this permit. c. In the event the permittee is unable to dispose of collected seafood waste by means of by- product recovery, because the recovery facility was operating at maximum capacity or was closed for repair and /or maintenance and was unable to utilize additional seafood waste, the permittee may dispose of said waste in the ocean dumping zone. The permittee shall provide the following information to EPA with the monthly Discharge Monitoring Report for each disposal activity: 1. The permittee must obtain certification from the by- product recovery facility stating: • the recovery facility was operating at maximum capacity or was closed for repair and /or maintenance and was unable to utilize additional seafood waste and • the date the seafood waste was not accepted at the by- product recovery facility. 2. Estimate of quantity of seafood waste disposed of at the ocean dumping zone. 3. Name and address of company responsible for barging said waste to the seafood dumping zone. 4.. Latitude and longitude of area where wastes were disposed in the ocean dumping zone. DRAFT Page 8 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000042 -6 5. Notification of Changes in Capacity The permittee shall give notice to the Director and ADEC of any planned physical alterations or operational changes to the permitted facility which will result in the processing of more than the following amounts of raw seafood in a single day: Species Maximum Daily Production Halibut 225,000 pounds Salmon 130,000 pounds Herring 125,000 pounds True Cod 225,000 pounds Flat Fish 120,000 pounds Black Cod 180,000 pounds Pollock 200,000 pounds ,Red Fish 125,000 pounds Shark 200,000 pounds Dungeness Crab 100,000 pounds Red King Crab 150,000 pounds Blue King Crab 150,000 pounds Brown King Crab 150,000 "pounds Bairdi Crab 100,000 pounds Opilio Crab 75,000 pounds Sea Urchin 10,000 pounds Shrimp 96,000 pounds Notification shall be given at least ninety (90) days p to implementation of the planned changes. 6 *. Reopener Clause If effluent limitation guidelines applicable to this facility are promulgated that contain limits different from those contained in this permit, the permit shall be modifies to reflect the limits in the. guidelines. If there is evidence indicating potential or realized impacts on water quality due to the discharge of seafood processing wastewater, the permit may be modified to includh different effluent limitations' and /or additional monitoring requirements. 7. Alaska Water Quality Standards All discharges shall be in compliance with Alaska Water Quality Standards (18 AAC 70). DRAFT Page 9 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000042 -6 E. Definitions. _ 1. "Accumulation" refers to the presence. of any measurable amount of seafood waste present on the bottom substrate. For purposes•of this permit, measurable is defined as a thickness of one centimeter or more. 2. "Bypass" means the intentional. diversion of waste streams • from any portion of a treatment facility. 3. "Daily Discharge" means the discharge of a pollutant measured during a calendar day or any 24 -hour period that reasonably represents the calendar day for purposes of sampling.H For pollutants with limitations expressed in units of mass, the "daily discharge" is calculated as the total mass of the pollutant discharged over the day. For pollutants with limitations expressed in other units of measurement, the "daily discharge" is calculated as the average measurement of the pollutant over the. day. 4. "Daily Maximum" discharge means the highest allowable "daily discharge ". 5. "Grab" sample is a single sample or measurement taken at a specific time or over as short a period of time as is feasible. 6. "Monthly Average" see attachment 2, page 3 of this permit. 7. "Quantity of Waste" is calculated as follows: Quantity of Waste = (Quantity of Raw Seafood) - (Quantity of Finished Product). 8. "Severe Property Damage" means substantial physical damage to property, damage to the treatment facilities which cause: them to become inoperable, or substantial. and permanent lost of natural resources which can reasonably be expected to occur in the absence of a bypass.. Severe property damage does not mean economic loss caused by delays in production. 9. "24 -Hour. Composite" sample shall mean a flow proportioned mixture of not -less than 8 discrete aliquots. Each aliquot shall be a grab sample of not, less than 100 ml and shall be collected and stored in accordance with procedures • prescribed in the most recent edition of Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. no ACT Page. 10 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000042 -6 10. "Upset, means an exceptional incident in,which there is unintentional and temporary noncompliance with technology based permit effluent limitations because of factors beyond the reasonable control of the permittee. An upset does not include noncompliance to the extent caused by operational error, improperly designed treatment facilities, inadequate treatment facilities, lack of preventive maintenance, or careless or improper operation. II. MONITORING, RECORDING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS A. Representative Sampling. Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirements established under Part I shall be collected from the effluent stream prior to discharge into the receiving waters. Samples and measurements shall be representative of the volume and nature of the monitored discharge. B. Sonitorina Procedures. Monitoring must be conducted according tc test procedures approved under 40 CFR Part 136, unless other test procedures have been specified in this permit. C. Renortina of Monitoring Results. Monitoring results shall be summarized each month on the Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) form (EPA No. 3320 -1). The reports shall be submitted monthly and are to be postmarked by the 10th day of the following month. Legible copies of these, and all other reports, shall be signed and certified in accordance with the requirements of part rv.H.. Sianatory Requirements, and submitted to the Director, Water Division and the State agency at the following addresses: original to: United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 10 1200 Sixth Avenue, WD -135 Seattle, Washington 98101 copy to: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC) Southcentral Region 3601 'C' Street, Suite 1334 ' Anchorage, Alaska 99503 D. Additional Moni "torina by the Permittee. If the permittee, monitors any pollutant more frequently than required by this permit, using test procedures approved under 40 CFR 136 or as specified in this permit, the results of this monitoring shall b. included in the calculation and reporting of the data submitted in the DMR. Such increased frequency shall also be indicated. DRAFT Page 11 of 20 Permit No.: AR- 000042 -6 Records Contents. Records of monitoring information shall include: 1. The date, exact place, and time of sampling or measurements; 2. The individual(s) who performed the sampling or measurements; 3. The date(s) analyses were performed; 4. The individual(s) who performed the analyses; . 5. The analytical techniques or methods used; and 6. The results of such analyses. F. Retention of Records. The permittee shall retain records of all 'monitoring information, including all calibration and maintenance records and all original strip chart-recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation, copies of all reports required by this permit, and records of all data used to complete the application for this permit, for a period of at least three years from the date of the :sample, measurement, report or application. This period may be extended by request of the Director or ADEC at any time. Data collected on -site, copies of Discharge Monitoring Reports, and a copy of this NPDES permit must be maintained on -site during the duration of activity.at the permitted location. G. Twenty -four Hour Notice of Noncompliance Reporting. 1. The following occurrences of noncompliance shall be reported by telephone within 24 hours from -the time the permittee becomes aware of the circumstances: a. Any noncompliance which may endanger health or the environment; b. Any unanticipated bypass which exceeds any effluent limitation in the permit (See Part III.G.. Bvnass of Treatment Facilities.);. c. Any upset which exceeds any effluent limitation in the permit (See Part III.H,. UPset Conditions.); or d. Violation of a maximum daily discharge limitation for any of the pollutants listed in the permit to be reported within 24 hours. ©F 'Page 12 of 20 Permit No.: AIC- 000042 -6 2. A written submission shall also be provided within five days of the time that the permittee becomes aware of the circumstances. The written submission shall contain: a. A description of the noncompliance and its cause; b. The period of noncompliance, including exact dates and times; c. The estimated time noncompliance is expected to continue if it has not been corrected; and d.• Steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent reoccurrence of the noncompliance. 3. The Director may waive the written report on a case -by -case basis if the oral report has been received within 24 hours by the Water Compliance Section in Seattle, Washington, by phone, (206) 553 -1213. 4. Reports shall be submitted to the addresses in part II.C.. Reporting of Monitoring Results. H. Other Noncompliance Reporting. Instances of noncompliance not required to be reported within 24 hours shall be reported at the time that monitoring reports for Part II.C. are submitted. The reports shall contain the information listed in Part II.G.2. I. Inspection and Entry. The permittee shall allow the Director, ADEC, or an authorized representative (including an authorized contractor acting as a representative of the Administrator), upor the presentation of credentials and other documents as may be required by law, to: 1., Enter upon the permittee's premises where a regulated facility or activity is located or conducted, or where records must be kept under the conditions of this permit; 2. Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records • that must be kept under the conditions of this permit; 3. Inspect at reasonable times any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and control equipment), practices,.or operations regulated or required under this permit; and 4. Sample or monitor at reasonable times, for the purpose of assuring permit compliance or as otherwise authorized by th( Act, any substances or parameters at any location. J. Compliance Schedules. Reports of compliance or noncompliance with, or any progress reports on interim and final requirements contained in any Compliance Schedule of this'permit "(Part I) shall be submitted no later than 10 days following each schedule date. nn. A CT Page 13 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000042 -6 III. COMPLIANCE RESPONSIBILITIES A. puts to Comely. The permittee must comply with all conditions of this permit. Any permit noncompliance constitutes a violation of the Act and is grounds for. enforcement action; for permit termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification; or for denial of a permit renewal application. The permittee shall give advance 'notice to• the Director•and ADEC of any planned changes in the permitted facility or activity which may result in noncompliance with permit requirements. B. penalties for Violations of Permit Cgpditiona. 1. Civil Penalty. The Act provides that any person who violates a permit condition implementing Sections 301, 302, 306, 307, 308, 318, or 405 of the Act shall be subject to a civil penalty, not to exceed $25,000 per day for each violation. 2. Criminal Penalties: a. Negligent Violations. The.Act provides that any person who negligently violates a permit condition implementing Sections 301, 302, 306, 307, 308, 318, or 405 of the Act shall be punished by a fine of not less than. $2,500 nor more than $25,000 per day of violation, or by imprisonment for not more than 1 year, or by both. b. Knowing Violations. The Act provides that any person who knowingly violates a permit condition implementing Sections 301, 302, 306, 307, 308, 318., or 405 of the Act shall be punished by a fine of not less than $5,00C nor more than $50,000 per day of violation, or by imprisonment for not.more than 3 years, or by both. c. Knowing Endangerment. The Act provides that any perso: who knowingly violates a permit condition implementing Sections 301, 302, 306, 307, 308, 318, or 405 of the Act, and who knows at that time that he thereby places another person in imminent danger of death or serious, bodily injury, shall, upon conviction, be subject to`a fine of not more than $250,000 or imprisonment of not more than•15 years, or both. 'A person which is an organization shall, upon conviction of violating this subparagraph,' be subject to a fine of not more than $1,000,000. !'1 re Jnn Page 14 of 20 . Permit No.: AK- 000042 -6 d. False Statements. The Act provides that any person who knowingly makes any false material statement, representation, or certification•in any application, record, report, plan, or other document filed or required to be maintained under this Act or who knowingly falsifies, tampers with, or renders inaccurate any monitoring device or method required to be maintained under this Act, shall upon conviction, be punished by a fine of not more that $10,000, or by imprisonment for not more than 2 years, or by both. Except as provided. in permit conditions in part III.G.. Bypass of Treatment Facilities and part III.H.. Upset Conditions, nothing in this permit shall be construed to relieve the permittee of the civil'or criminal penalties for noncompliance. C. Need to Halt or Reduce Activity not a Defense. It shall not be a defense for a permittee in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the conditions of this permit. D. Duty to Mitigate. The permittee shall take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any discharge in violation of this permit which has a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting human health "or the environment. E. Prover Operation and Maintenance. The permittee shall at all .times properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems of treatment. and control (and related appurtenances) which are installed or used by the-permittee-to achieve compliance with.thc conditions of this permit. Proper operation and maintenance alsc includes adequate laboratory controls and appropriate quality assurance procedures. This provision requires the operation of back -up or auxiliary facilities or similar systems which are installed by a permittee only when the operation is necessary to achieve compliance with the conditions of the permit.. F. gemoved substances. Solids, sludges, filter backwash, or other pollutants removed in the course of treatment or control of wastewater shall be disposed of in a manner such as to prevent any pollutant from such materials from entering navigable waters G. $vnass of Treatment Facilities: 1. Bypass not exceeding limitations. • The permittee may allow any bypass to occur which does not cause effluent limitations to be exceeded, but only if it also is for essential maintenance to assure efficient operation: These bypasses are not subject to the provisions of paragraphs 2 and 3 of this section, DRAFT Page 15 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000042 -6 2. Notice: a. Anticipated bypass. If the permittee knows in advance of the need for a bypass, it shall submit prior notice, if possible at. least 10 days before the date of the bypass. b. Unanticipated bypass. The permittee -shall submit notice of an unanticipated bypass as required under part II.G.. Twenty -four Hour Notice of Noncompliance jteoortinq. 3. Prohibition of bypass. a. Bypass is prohibited and the Director or ADEC may take enforcement action against a permittee for a bypass, unless: (1) The bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life, personal injury, or severe property damage; -(2) There were no feasible alternatives to the bypass such as the use of auxiliary treatment facilities retention of untreated wastes, or maintenance during normal periods of equipment downtime. Thi: condition is not satisfied if adequate back -up equipment should have been installed in the exercise of reasonable engineering judgment to prevent a bypass which occurred during normal periods of equipment downtime or preventive maintenance; and (3) The permittee submitted notices as required under .paragraph 2 of this section. b. The Director and ADEC may approve an anticipated bypass, after considering its adverse effects, if the Director and ADEC determine that it will meet the thre conditions listed above in paragraph 3.a. of this • section. H. Upset Conditions. 1. Effect of an upset. An upset constitutes an affirmative defense to an action brought for noncompliance with such technology based permit effluent limitations if the requirements of paragraph 2 of this section are met. No determination made during administrative review of claims that noncompliance was caused by upset, and before an actic for noncompliance, is final administrative action subject t judicial review. DRAFT Page. 16 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000042 -6 2. Conditions necessary for a demonstration of upset. A permittee who wishes to establish the affirmative defense of upset shall demonstrate, through properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs, or other relevant evidence that: a. An upset occurred and that the permittee can identify the cause(s) of the upset; b. The permitted facility was at the time being properly operated; c. The permittee submitted notice of the upset as requiret under Part II.G.. Twenty -four Hour Notice of Noncompliance Reporting; and d. The permittee complied with any remedial measures required under Part Imp.. Duty to Mitigate. 3. Burden of proof. In any enforcement proceeding, the permittee seeking to establish the occurrence of an upset has the burden of proof. Toxic Pollutants. The permittee shall comply with effluent standards or prohibitions established under Section 307(a) of till Act for toxic pollutants within the time provided in the regulations that establish those standards or prohibitions, even if the permit has not yet been modified to incorporate the requirement. IV. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS A. Changes in Discharae of Toxic Substances. Notification shall be provided to the Director and ADEC as soon as the permittee knows of, or has reason to believe: 1. That any activity has occurred or will occur which would result in the discharge, on a routine or frequent basis, of any toxic pollutant which is not limited in the permit, if that discharge will exceed the highest of the following "notification levels ": a. One hundred micrograms per liter (100 ug /l); b. Two hundred micrograms per liter (200 ug /l) for acrolein and acrylonitrile, five hundred micrograms pe liter (500 ug /l) for 2,4- dinitrophenol and for 2- methyl -4, 6- dinitrophenol; and one milligram per liter (1 mg /1) for antimony; .c. Five (5) times the maximum concentration value reporte for that pollutant in the permit application in accordance with 40 CFR 122.21(g)(7); or en irTh Page 17 of 20 Permit NO.: AK- 000042 -6 .d. The level established by the Director in accordance with 40 CFR 122.44(f). 2. That any activity has occurred or will occur which would result in any discharge, on a non - routine or infrequent basis, of a toxic pollutant which is not limited in the permit, if that discharge will exceed the highest of the following "notification levels ": a. Five hundred micrograms per liter (500 ug /1); b. One milligram per liter (1 mg /1) for antimony; c. Ten (10) times the maximum concentration value reporter for that pollutant in the permit application in accordance with 40 CFR 122.21(g)(7); or_ d. The level established by the Director in accordance with 40 CFR 122.44(f). Planned Changes. The permittee shall give notice to the Directo and ADEC as soon as possible of any planned physical alterations or additions to the permitted facility. Notice is required only when: 1. The alteration or addition to a permitted facility may meet one of the criteria for determining whether a facility is a new source as determined in 40 CFR 122.29(b); or 2. The alteration or addition could significantly change the nature or increase the quantity of pollutants discharged. This notification applies to pollutants which are subject neither to effluent limitations in the permit, nor to notification requirements under Part IV.A.1. C. Anticipated Noncompliance. The permittee shall also give advanc notice to the Director and ADEC of any planned changes in the permitted facility or activity which may result in noncompliance with permit requirements. D. permit Actions. This permit may be modified, revoked and reissued, or terminated for cause. The filing of a request by the permittee for a permit modification, revocation and reissuance, or termination, or a notification of planned change: or anticipated noncompliance, does not stay any permit conditior E. Duty to Reapply. If the permittee wishes to continue an activit regulated by this permit after the expiration date of this permit, the permittee must apply for and obtain a new permit. The application should be submitted at least 180 days before the expiration date of this permit. nP AFT Page 1S of 20 • Permit No.: AR- 000042 -6 F. Duty to Provide Information The permittee shall furnish to the Director and ADEC, within a reasonable time, any information which the Director or ADEC may request to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and reissuing, or terminating this permit, or to determine compliance with this permit. The permittee shall also furnish to the Director or ADEC, upon request, copies of records required to be, kept by this permit. G. Other Information. When the permittee becomes aware that it failed to submit any relevant facts in a permit application, or submitted'incorrect information in a permit application or any report to the Director or ADEC, it shall promptly submit such facts or information`. H. Signatory Requirements All applications, reports or information submitted to the Director and ADEC shall be signed and certified. 1. All permit applications shall be signed as follows: a. For a 'corporation: by a responsible corporate officer. b. For a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the proprietor,. respectively. c. For municipality, state, federal, or other public agency: by either a principal executive officer or ranking elected official. 2. All reports required by the permit and other information requested by the Director or ADEC shall be signed by a person described above or by a duly authorized representative of that person. A person is a duly authorized representative only if: a. The authorization is made in writing by a person described above and submitted to the Director and ADEC, and b. The authorization specified either an individual or a position having, responsibility for the overall operation-of the regulated facility or activity,' such as the position of plant manager, operator of a well oe a well field, superintendent, position of.equivalent responsibility, or an individual or position having overall responsibility for environmental matters for the company.. (A duly authorized representative may thus be either a named individual or any individual occupying a named position.)" nn P`,rt Page 19 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000042 -6 Changes to authorization. If an authorization under paragraph IV.H.2. is no longer accurate because :a different individual or position ,has responsibility for the overall operation Of the facility, a new authorization satisfying the requirements of paragraph IV.H.2. 'must be submitted to the Director and ADEC prior to or together with any reports,, information, or applications to be signed by an authorized representative. 4. Certification. Any person signing a, document under this section shall make the following certification: "I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to ' assure that qualified'personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons mho manage the system or those persons directly responsible for gathering tilt information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are - significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine`and imprisonment for knowing violations." I. Availability of Reports. Except for data determined to be confidential under 40 CFR Part 2, all reports prepared in accordance with the terms of this permit shall be available for public inspection at the offices of the Director and ADEC. As required by the Act, permit applications, permits and effluent data shall not be considered confidential. J. Oil and Hazardous Substance Liability. Nothing in this permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal action or relieve the permittee from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties to which the permittee is or may be subject under Section 311 of the Act. K. prooertv Riahts. The issuance of this permit does not convey an property rights of any sort, or any exclusive privileges, nor does it authorize any injury to private property or any invasion of personal rights, nor any infringement of federal, state or local laws or regulations. Severability. The provisions of this permit are severable, and if any provision of this permit, or the application of any provision of this permit to any circumstance, is held invalid, the application of such provision to other circumstances, and th remainder of this permit, shall not be affected thereby. L. Page 20 of 20 Permit No.: AK- 000042 -6 Transfers. This permit may be automatically transferred to a nem permittee if: 1. The current permittee notifies the Director at least 30 days in advance of the proposed transfer date; 2. The notice includes a written agreement between the existinc and new permittees containing a specific date for transfer of permit responsibility, coverage, and liability between them; and 3. The Director does not notify the existing permittee and the proposed new permittee of his or her intent to modify, or revoke and reissue the permit. If this notice is not received, the transfer is effective on the data specified i3 the agreement mentioned in paragraph 2 above. N. State Laws. Nothing in this permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal action or relieve the permittee from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties established pursuant to any applicable state law or regulation under authority preserved by Section 510 of the Act. - ATTACHMENT 1 Limitations for Multiple Species Processing Effluent limitations for the processing of multiple species are derived using the following "generic" equation: Limit in lbs /1000 lbs • (Bottomfish Limit)(% Bottomfish) + (Crab Limit)(% Crab) + (Herring Limit)(I Herring) + (HD Salmon Limit)(% HB Salmon) + (Mech Salmon Limit)(% Mach Salmon) + (Scallop Limit)(% Scallop). where, % Bottomfish Amount of bottomfish processed divided by the total amount of seafood processed (Amount of Bottomfish) / (Amount of Raw Seafood) % Crab = Amount of crab processed divided by the total' amount of seafood processed _ (Amount of Crab) / (Amount of Raw Seafood) % Herring = Amount of herring processed divided by the total amount of seafood processed % HB Salmon Mech Salmon % Scallop and Bottomfish Limit Crab Limit Herring Limit _ (Amount of Herring) / (Amount of Raw Seafood) = Amount of hand- butchered salmon divided by the total amount of seafood processed • (Amount of HB Salmon) / (Amount of Raw Seafood) a Amount of mechanized salmon divided by the total amount of seafood processed - (Amount of Mech. Salmon) / (Amount of Raw Seafood) as Amount Of scallop processed divided by the total amount of seafood processed = (Amount. of Scallop) / (Amount of, Raw Seafood) = Effluent limitation in Part I.A.1. for bottomfish processing - Effluent limitation in Part I.A.1. for processing a Effluent limitation in Part I.A.'for herring processing HB Salmon Limit Mech Salmon Limit Scallop Limit 2 Effluent limitation in Part I.A. for hand - butchered Salmon - 'Effluent limitation in Part I.A. for mechanized salmon processing a Effluent limitation in Part I.A. for scallop processing Two pollutants are limited in the permit, TSS and Oil and Grease. Each pollutant is limited on a monthly average and daily maximum basis. Therefore, by substituting the limitation for each species in the generic equation above,. we can generate the following four limitations for Multiple Species processing: TSS - Monthly Average TSS - Daily Maximum Oil and Grease - Monthly Average Oil and Grease - Daily Maximum TSS - Monthly Average Limitation a 12(1 Bottomfish) + 3.9(1 Crab) + 24(1 Herring) + 1.6(1 HB Salmon) + 26(1 Mech Salmon) + 1.4(1 Scallop) NOTE: Processing percentages are calculated over the month TSS - Daily Maximum Limitation a 22(1 Bottomfish) + 12(1 Crab) + 32(1 Herring) + 2.6(0 HB Salmon) + 44(1 Mech Salmon) + 6.6(4 Scallop) NOTE: Processing percentages are calculated over the sampling day Oil and Grease - Monthly Average Limitation a 3.9(1 Bottomfish) + 0.42(1 Crab) + 10(1 Herring) + 0.19(1 HB Salmon) + 11(1 Mech Salmon) + 0.24(1 Scallop) NOTE: Processing percentages are calculated over the month Oil and Grease - Daily Maximum Limitation - 9.9(% Bottomfish) + 1.3(% Crab) + 27.(1 Herring) + 0.31(1 HB Salmon) + 29(% Mech Salmon) + 7.7(1 Scallop) NOTE: Processing percentages are calculated over the sampling day. These limitations shall be calculated and included in an attachment t the monthly DMRs. .ATTACHMENT 2 sample of Calculations to Determine Compliance With the Permit Limits These are sample calculations of plant discharge (lbs /1000 lbs) values which shall be compared to limitations in Part i:A.l. to determine compliance. ,- Given: Discharges were sampled four days during the* month of June 1988. - Hand - butchered salmon and bottomfish were processed. .The following table provides data for the month of June 1988. pounds of Raw Product Date, Flow. MGD TSS Conc..ma /1 Hp Salmon Dottomfish 6/2/88 0.075 36.8 10,000 6/9/88 0.098 41.5 23,070 6/16./88 0.127 39.4 6,155 60,000 6/27/88 0.077 47.5 1,210 - - - Daily Maximum Calculations Step 1. Determine the Daily Maximum discharge for TSS for each day samples are collected. Daily Maximum discharge (in lbs /1000 lbs) equals the measured effluent flow (mqd), multiplied by the measured effluent concentration (mg /1), multiplied by a conversion factor (8,340), and divided by the total amount of raw'seafood processed (lbs). Note that the flow, concentration, and amount of seafood processed shall be measured over the same 24 -hour period. Daily Maximum = (f lowl(concentration)(8 ;340) (Daily Production) Therefore, 6/2/88 Daily Maximum =( 0. 075mgd )(36.8mg/1)(8,-340)/10,000 lbs 2.30 lbs /1.000 lbs 6/9/88 Daily • Maximum = ( 0. 098mgd)(41.5mg/1)(8,340)/23,070 lbs = 1.47 lbs /1.000 lbs, 6/16/88 Daily Maximum = ( 0. 127mgd)(39.4mg/1)(8,340)/66,155 lbs = 0.63 lbs /1.000 lbs no A! T 6/27/88 Daily Maximum ■ ( 0 .077mgd)(47.5mg/1)(8,340)/1,210 lbs 25.2 lbs /1,000 lbs Daily Maximum calculations shall be made for each day that samples are collected. Step 2. Determine compliance with applicable daily maximum effluent limitations. To determine compliance, the above calculated Daily Maximum discharge value shall be compared to the applicable Daily Maximum limit in Part I.A.1. of the permit. The applicable limitation from Part I.A.1. is dependent upon whether only hand - butchered salmon, only bottomfish, or both hand - butchered salmon and bottomfish are processed on the day of sampling. Since only bottomfish is processed on 6/2/88 and 6/9/88, these calculated daily maximum discharge values shall be compared to the daily maximum TSS limitation in Part I.A.1., for bottomfish, of 22 lbs /1,000 lbs. The same type of comparison can be made fo: the 6/27/88 calculation where only hand - butchered salmon is processed. Because more than one species of seafood is processed on 6/16/88 the calculated daily maximum TSS discharged must be'compared to . variable limitation which is derived based upon a proportion of each seafood species processed. This variable gaily Max TSS Limitation is calculated as follows: Limitation = 2.6(% NB Salmon) + 22(% Bottomfish) = 2.6(6,155/66,155) + 22(60,000/66,155) a 20.2 lbs /1000 lbs This equation is defined in detail in Attachment 1 of the permit CONCLUSION DATE TSS DAILY MAX TSS. DAILY MAX LIMITATION, (LBS /1000 LDS) (PART I.A.1. OF PERMIT) (LBS /1000 LBS) 6/2/88 2.30 22 6/9/88 1.47 22 6/16/88 0.63 20.2 "6/27/88 25.20 2.6 From the above information, it can be seen that_ the facility was not in compliance on 6/27/88. Monthly Average Calculations. Step 1. Determine the Average Monthly discharge for TSS (for June 1988) The Average Monthly TSS discharge equals the summation of all Daily Maximum discharge values calculated during the time period covered by the OMR in question (June), divided by the total production. Therefore, Monthly Average is [(0.075 mgd)(36.8 mg /1) + (0.098 mgd)(41.5 mg /1) + (0.127.mgd)(39.4 mg /1) + (0.077 mgd)(47.5 mg /1)] x (8,340)1(10,000 + 23,070 + 66,155 + 1,210) al 1.3 lbs /1000 lbs Monthly Average calculations shall be made each month. Step 2. Determine compliance with applicable monthly average effluent limitations. • To determine compliance, the above calculated Monthly Average discharge value shall be compared to the applicable Monthly Average limitation in Part I.A.1. of the permit. The applicable limitation from Part I.A.1. is dependent upon whether only hand - butchered salmon, only bottomfish, or both hand - butchered salmon and bottomfish are processed on any day that samples are collected, during the month in question. For this example,• since both hand - butchered salmon and bottomfis are processed during the sampling period in the month of June tht above calculated Monthly Average TSS discharge must be compared to a variable limitation which is based upon a proportion of Back seafood species processed. This variable Monthly Average TSS limitation is calculated as follows: Limitation - 1.6(% HD Salmon) + 12(% Bottomfish) 1.6(7,365/100,435) + 12(93,070/100,435) 11.2 lbs /1.000 lbs This equation is defined in detail in Attachment -1 of the permit. DATE CONCLUSION TSS MONTHLY AVG TSS MONTHLY AVG LIMITATION (LBS /1000 LBS) PART I.A.1. OF PERMIT (LES /1000 LBS1 6/2/88 THRU 6/27/88. 4 From the above information, it can be seen that the facility was in compliance for the TSS Monthly Average limitations. NOTE: The above example only examines the TSS results. The same calculations apply to'Oil i Grease. Calculations shall be made during each month and submitted with the DMRS for the month in question. •1•-. t P.. ii ii 1 I" ••t stars N 9 a ilrr{4fr i� stars • N W • sa 1 � ise ` j Is •1 a1 ,•. Is 1 i li , .• •{? •7 U If afl Itt1 Sr t!•7 4. t 'a- 41st It II jii ' es, 'C7ir iw4 i f T1-••.• •a. y 7f IIy N • i •y- �• 44 ,.,w r h.s` I, •'• M N, •' 1. • t •L . • . tl 1f as 7I 'Jet 'Lief I i . r... • • Yj 1 t•. •, fa 171. .11 � � •+.•i: la al Ifs: \.�1• 1 N �� IS It II •a N� r N , Ir . i� 11 al: 81 as lien" 1►•• • .Y ~. ' :ati �� •• 1s of MI >, i, :� •14 11.. ... / • era 1iJI I7•�,• •• • a a• f t-''t. • es. 77 II �ll N ��„y• la. a+ i/1g1I1 .•:•L O� a ' • 11 Y P• • Ca, 1:atl• N • IIl.wrat 31 �1.f'Zh.a le^ N..r� is a' 3 4 v .• J Olt. it r a I of 44 1'� • al M sl t> II 'n • at 1• • N N Ys as qa . 44 .y a If . sa '''{ A N • •a Ma IS V • 144 S / •! jN u '`•� L' 42 ti. IS 41 1 I It. • a w a - •.""+�r . f1 SEAFOOD W111lItm 1:OH6 11 sr M 'li N Is as u 3% (4i I' `•s: K • w . • r as ai • p . •1 ••14 a : 1`,Ol...a• .•s _ •••••••• ,a •a W • x Kr • a • -04 III I .N 4:l 7 1s • too N .ai y. .M•,rSfi4 4 N •• •I1'_�o II Or :. •a 4 41• .. d.) 4) la b 41- " N / ^' •SI iI `'7` • >• it If it 1f sa le ads as no Si at N Aral a TIE 41 Si f I' L �M..••a••� Y► . 11 41 a p 7y l re. tri I al •:i if >• >• /.. '..4 I . .• u as re.- •II' .. t! r 11 rI • I •S!••:1{• le 'n1/ 11171 I. :r •11 •,• •�1 • Is N IS <' • � vie ' j• 1> as t- ••I Al si a u+ ES Of • •• N • •►• •.. N 4. .•.r••i.•I trot" r ! it • r, • •,.•7L 1 . 71 .r w1 a t: • '!• } as i� .1 41/13; ' +• 16 s ij•/ . j•• {.•• AI sl '*-3•• �{ j tel 1{ 1� q N 11 4 set 74 a '•• •. M • b s: ._ . >. a 1 III q - ▪ -1:•- .. rag 1 Is 1j1 N 1 1 i 1f / 71 • +1 • It a 11 M ! M ss • ' Iu .o u( ��: �J 411 • .. � �/ 1{ fi ' • Y — ,ta .. '••ti • • 1: 11 Si fill, ,� . II auk !; 4 as 11 's•'iaN �•�'L� N f � 17��1/+ I • 1i«• W 1••••) 71 J•� t 11 r• _f S . 17 7L - U -- t 3' as • 'eV V alr • MI bI• s { :1::r• N J•. t .1; - ,1 -.14' :�1 K • Ii ••11 w u pI+jr Nil gas 1 it 5? 4 /I I�' Y N a • a1 • tea.•:: H 4. f1 /.y ,'a•' 1 • .1/ Ii.. 7) • N 41. • is •. (get: •f , • N Is 71 11... `.may + w L as yr. as Nor... L % 51 • $1 • M 1 ''/ 11 q M t.1. M sI t1 1{e/ ermu:S0 Va. an de• / 177 �wi4%./trj.t;•17 .. 71 NaMee X11 •13 • 1/ Ia 17 17 • N IS 111 11s 10 ~ IH • 7 K NJ 31 / — •' N 7. a'UI It �� l0 `N 'T • '7s' 61 u1. .a 1 • Is1 /10 N w1 so N es N{ 1N N Is 61 1` M ♦ kg a �j s{ 5$ 16 lap a I14 a . I• •. 8• { 17 / st .• j K'� ..tiYa • q 9 ..6 so ;. is es '4 „▪ a . •.1 • b • .s It 70 11 • rJaf1�% r • -:; a • Is - a •p 7s N �% 1 I' SEAFOOD a 11 4 • Is 'N a 04 14 e. Mora 1, l•, `�NI� Iq #1 04+111 I a •. wp M • as /s �+.t t {t >i OM, IRO ZONE 1+ M • 1+ a{ 71 7{ 11 11 1s It '/ a. 1 It N '- a wf•1I M 11 31 30 6 TIE. 7s•.• + eTN • � / IN N. • 1.3 I1• It II a .1 a.`�4..01tII11I Ar -I •• s. N - - -•� Aj .74 43 r •• 70!4..J11 _ • 1.: �•v K N {I i 1 SO • r is S. 11 J • K.� 11 ••• N IO • I: K • 1 11 •�' At. ' • •• .'It ••� 11 1� {1 1, 11 I.. C. .K!' I. . K .:.T :':�';'t1'•..,.:Yf /1' ' -. ... to, eagle .1• v N{ . . - 1 Issas » : 'r�Z'» 3' >• USE DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION SOUTHCENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE 3601 C ST., SUITE 1350 ANCHORAGE, AK 99503 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED ' November 10, 1988 _James Major East Point Seafood ( Q`')) P.O. Box 1637 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Dear Mr. Major: STEVE COWPER, GOVERNOR 563 -6529 NOV 6 1988 CGxtuliTe''? ,; v'GO RE; Near Island Channel 2, NPACO No. 071- 0YD -2- 880598 In accordance with Section 401 of the Clean Water Act of 1977 and provisions of the Alaska Water Quality Standards, the Department of Environmental Conservation is issuing the Certificate of Rea- sonable Assurance for the proposed construction of a rock fill in an intertidal area at Kodiak, Alaska. This department action represents only one element of the overall project level coastal management consistency determination issued by the Office of Management and Budget under AS 44.19 and 6 AAC 50.070. Department of Environmental Conservation regulations provide that any person who disagrees with any portion of this decision, may request an adjudicatory hearing in accordance with 18 AAC 15.200- 310. The request should be mailed to the Commissioner of the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, P.O. Box 0, Juneau, AK 99811 -1800 or delivered to his office at 3220 Hospital Drive, Juneau. Failure to submit a hearing request within thirty days of receipt of this letter shall constitute a waiver of that person's right to judicial review of this decision. By copy of this letter we are advising the Corps of Engineers and the Division of Governmental Coordination of our actions and en- closing a copy of the certification for their use. Enclosure BHL:TR:ras cc: Corps of Engineers EPA, AK Operations L &WM /DNR, Anchorage Parks /DNR, Anchorage ADF &G, Anchorage i.;efinda Freed, Kodiak Boro Si NMFS F &WS OMB /GCU, Anchorage Kodiak District Office, ADEC Kerry Howard, ADEC /Juneau a oreaux�' egional Supervisor tr STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION CERTIFICATE OF REASONABLE ASSURANCE A Certificate of Reasonable Assurance, as required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act, has been requested by Queen Fisheries, East Point Seafoods, 420 Marine Way, Kodiak, Alaska 99615, for the construction of a 40'x40'x20' deep, shot rock fill in marine waters. The fill will be used as a storage area. The proposed activity is located in the Near Island Channel, 420 Marine Way, Kodiak, Alaska. Public notice of the application for this certification has been made in accordance with 18 AAC 15.180. Water Quality Certification is required for the proposed activity because the activity will be authorized by a Corps of Engineers permit identified as Near Island Channel 2, NPACO No. 071- 0YD -2- 880598 and a discharge may result from the proposed activity. Having reviewed the application and comments received in response to the public notice, the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation certifies that there is reasonable assurance that the proposed activity, as well as any discharge which may result, is in compliance with the requirements of Section 401 of the Clean Water Act which includes the Alaska Water Quality Standards, 18 AAC 70, and the Standards of the Alaska Coastal Management Program, 6 AAC 80., provided that the following stipulations are adhered to. These stipulations were adopted pursuant to 6 AAC 50 (Project Consistency with the Alaska Coastal Management Program) and are necessary to ensure that your project is consistent with the ACMP: 1. The fill will not contain trash, refuse, organic matter or any substance which is defined as solid waste under State Regulation 18 AAC 60 [Solid Waste Management Regulation]. 2. All fill placed within the intertidal waters must be free of overburden, organic matter and clays which cause water siltation. Lamore onal Supervisor OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR DIVISION OF GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION SOUTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE 431 NORTH FRANKLIN P.O. BOX AW, SUITE 101 JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811 -0165 PHONE(907)465-3562 REGISTERED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Mr. James-Major Queen Fisheries P.O. Box 1637 Kodiak, AK 99615 Dear Mr. Major: SOUTHCENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE 2600 DENALI STREET SUITE 700 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503 -2798 PHONE: (907) 274 -1581 November 9, 1988 SUBJECT: NEAR ISLAND CHANNEL 2 STATE I. D. NO. AK880928 -25A CONCLUSIVE CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION The Division of Governmental Coordination (DGC) has completed coordinating the state's review of your project for consistency with the Alaska Coastal Management Program (ACMP). On November 1, 1988 you were issued a proposed consistency finding for your project. The project is to place approximately 1200 cubic yards of shot rock fill into the waters of Near Island Channel, Kodiak Island, Alaska (LOT N -32B 410 Marine Way, T. 27 S., R. 20 W., S.M.). The fill area will provide a solid base for refrigerated van parking and storage. This consistency determination applies to the federal consistency determination required for your_project and the following state and federal authorizations as per 6 AAC 50: STEVE COWPER, GOVERNOR CENTRAL OFFICE P.O. BOX AW JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811 -0165 PHONE: (907) 465-3562 NORTHERN REGIONAL OFFICE 675 SEVENTH AVENUE STATION H FAIRBANKS, ALASKA 99701 -4596 PHONE: (907) 456 -3084 ca 1CCb11'6f NOV ! 1988 COMMUNITY rZ7ZLO.PM7'N2 1. Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) - Certificate of Reasonable Assurance 2. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) - Section 10 and Section 404 Permits Based on the review of your project by the Alaska Departments of Natural Resources, Environmental Conservation and Fish and Game, and the Kodiak Island Borough, the state concurs with your certification that the project is consistent with the ACMP provided the following conditions are met. These conditions will appear as stipulations on the state permits noted. 01 -A35LH r C Mr. James Major 2 November 9, 1988 Near Island Channel 2 AX880928 -25A The following stipulations will appear as conditions on the Certificate of Reasonable Assurance issued by DEC: 1. The fill will not contain trash, refuse, organic matter, or any substance which is defined as solid waste under 18 AAC 60 Solid Waste Management Regulation. 2. All fill placed within the intertidal waters must be free of overburden, organic matter, and clays which cause water siltation. These conditions.are necessary_ to_ prevent_pollution.and- siltation -- - of the waters of Near Island Channel, as per 6 AAC 80.140, the Air, Land and Water Quality Standards of the ACMP. Copies of these ACMP standards are enclosed. This conclusive consistency determination represents a consensus reached between you as the project applicant and the reviewing agencies listed above, as provided for under 6 AAC 50.070(k), regarding the conditions necessary to insure the consistency of the proposed project with the ACMP. As also provided under 15 CFR 930.64(c), federal authorization of your project will be made with the full understanding that your original project proposal has been modified subject to the conditions described above. If changes to the approved project are proposed prior to or during its siting, construction, or operation, you are required to contact this office immediately to determine if further review and approval of the revised project is necessary. The state reserves the right to enforce compliance with this conclusive consistency determination if the project is changed in any significant way, or if the actual use differs from the approved_ use contained in _.the_.project descr- iptiom. - If-appropri- ate, the state may amend the state approvals listed in this conclusive consistency determination. By a copy of this letter, we are informing the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers of our determination. If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 274 -1581. co9/59 Sincerely th Pro ect Review Coordinator Mr. James Major 3 November 9, 1988 Near Island Channel 2 AK880928 -25A Enclosures cc; John C. Leeds, III U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tim Rumfelt Department of Environmental Conservation Wayne Dolezal Department of Fish and Game Greg Curney Departmentof Natural_ Resources Linda Freed Kodiak Island Borough, Community Development Department Carrie Sykes (w /PIS), DGC, Juneau . co9/59 STVE „ OFFICE OF TIIE GOVERNOR DIVISION OF GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION SOUTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE 431 NORTH FRANKLIN P.O. BOX AW, SUITE 101 JUNEAU. ALASKA 99811 -0165 PHONE: (907) 465-3562 REGISTERED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Mr. James Major Queen Fisheries, Inc. 420 Marine Way Kodiak, AK 99615 SOUTHCENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE 2600 DENALI STREET SUITE 700 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503 -2798 PHONE: (907) 274 -1581 November 1, Dear Mr. Major: SUBJECT: NEAR ISLAND CHANNEL 2 AK880928 -25A PROPOSED CONSISTENCY FINDING STEVE COWPER, GOVERNOR CENTRAL OFFICE P.O. BOX AW JUNEAU, ALASKA 99811 -0165 PHONE: (907) 4653562 NORTHERN REGIONAL OFFICE 675 SEVENTH AVENUE STATION H FAIRBANKS, ALASKA 99701 -4596 PHONE: (907) 456-3084 1988 (i -a ` 'U5nvil.E Nov 3- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT The Division of Governmental Coordination is currently coordinat- ing the review of your project for consistency with the Alaska Coastal Management Program (ACMP) and has developed this proposed consistency finding based on reviewers' comments. The project is to place approximately 1200 cubic yards of shot rock fill into the waters of Near Island Channel, Kodiak Island, Alaska (Lot N -328 410 Marine Way, T. 27 S., R. 20 W., S.M.). The fill area will provide a solid base for refrigerated van parking and storage. This proposed consistency finding applies to the following state and federal authorizations as per 6 AAC 50. 1. Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) - Certificate of Reasonable Assurance 2. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) - Section 10 and Section 404 Permits Based on the review of your project by the Alaska Departments of Natural Resources, Environmental Conservation, and Fish and Game, and the Kodiak Island Borough, the state concurs with your certification that the project is consistent with the ACMP provided the following conditions are met. The following stipulations will appear as conditions on the Certificate of Reasonable Assurance issued by DEC: 01 -A35LH Mr. James Major 2 October 31, 1988 Near Island Channel 2 AK880928 -25A 1. The fill will not contain trash, refuse, organic matter, or any substance which is defined as solid waste under 18 AAC 60 Solid Waste Management Regulation. 2. All fill placed within the intertidal waters must be free of overburden, organic matter, and clays which cause water siltation. These conditions are necessary to prevent pollution and siltation of the waters of Near Island Channel, as per 6 AAC 80.140, the Air, Land and Water Quality Standards of the ACMP. Copies of the relevant standards are enclosed. Please contact me within five days of your receipt of this proposed finding to indicate whether or not you concur with this finding. If you are not prepared to concur within the five day period, you may either: (a) request an extension of the review schedule, if you need more time to consider this finding, or (b) request that the state reconsider this finding, by submitting a written statement requesting "elevation" of the finding, describing your concerns, and proposing an alternative consistency finding. This alternative finding must demonstrate how your project is consistent with the referenced standards of the ACMP [and district policy /policies] without the stipulation(s) included in this proposed finding. If I don't receive your request for extension or elevation statement within five days of your receipt of this letter, this proposed finding will be issued as a final conclusive consistency determination. If you concur with the proposed consistency finding, it will be issued as a final conclusive consistency determination. By copy of this letter, we are informing the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers reviewing your project of our proposed finding. If you have any questions regarding this process, please contact me at 274 -1581. Project Review Coordinator co10 /13 Mr. James Major 3 October 31, 1988 Near Island Channel 2 AK880928 -25A Enclosures cc:- John C. Leeds, III U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tim Rumfelt Department of Environmental Conservation Wayne Dolezal Department of Fish and Game Greg Curney Department of Natural Resources Linda Freed Kodiak Island Borough, Community Development Department Carrie Sykes (w /PIS), DGC, Juneau co10 /13 MEMORANuUM State of Alaska TO: Alison L. Smith Project Coordinator Office of Management & Budget FILE NO.: Division of Governmental Coordinaton TELEPHONE NO.: DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME DATE: October 12, 1988 FROM: C. Wayne Dole al Habitat Biologist Region II Habitat Division Department of Fish and Game 02-001 A (Rev 11.85) SUBJECT: 267 -2284 Queen Fisheries, Inc. Near Island Channel 2 COE No. 2- 880598 SID AK880928 -25A The Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF &G) has reviewed the storage pad construction project referenced above. The project entails the placement of approximately 1200 cubic yards of shot rock adjacent to an existing refrigerated van storage and parking area. The footprint of the fill is to be 40 -feet x 40 -feet. We have no objection to the project as proposed. Pursuant to 6 AAC 80.010(b), the ADF &G recommends that this project be found consistent with the Standards of the Alaska Coastal Management Program and the Industrial Development Policies of the Kodiak Island Borough Coastal Management Program. By copy of this memorandum we are providing the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers with these initial comments and recommendations on the project pursuant to the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.0 661 et seq.). The department's position regarding this project will be that adopted in the state's coastal management consistency determination (6 AAC 80.010 et seq.). We appreciate the opportunity to comment. If you have any specific questions, please contact me at 267 -2333. cc: L. Freed, KIB. R. Morris, NMFS• R. Bowker, FWS T. Rumfelt, ADEC (PROFS) V. Gilbert, ADNR /DLWM (PROFS) D. Kohler, COE. P. Probasco, ADF &G R. Sumner, EPA Queen Fisheries, Applicant OMB (PROFS) I. OCT 1719W COMMUNITY 8fP lOPM!NTOsPT,