BELLS FLATS TR D-1 OF TR A - Variance (2)Royal Large
Box 2634
Kodiak, Alaska 99615
Kodiak Island Borough
710 MILL BAY ROAD
KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 -6340
PHONE (907) 486 -5736
August 17, 1989
Re: Case 88.046. Request for a two (2) year extension of a previously
approved variance from Section 17.24.040(A)(1) (Yards) of the Borough Code
permitting the construction of a storage building on an existing foundation that
encroaches eighteen (18) feet into the required thirty (30) foot front yard setback
in an l -- Industrial Zoning District. Tract D -1 of Tract A, Bells Flats Alaska
Subdivision; 142 Sargent Creek Road.
Dear Mr. Large:
The Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting on
August 16, 1989, approved the request for the two (2) year extension cited above,
subject to the following condition:
1. Access to and parking for the proposed structure shall be prohibited adjacent to
Sargent Creek Road and in front of the proposed structure. The intent of this
condition is to prohibit a loading dock and /or parking in front of the building
adjacent to Sargent Creek Road.
An appeal of this decision may be initiated by any person or party aggrieved by filing a
written notice of appeal with the Borough Clerk within ten (10) days of the date of the
Commission's decision. The notice of appeal must state the specific grounds for the
appeal and the relief sought by the appellant. Therefore, the Commission's decision will
not be final and effective until ten (10) days following the decision.
Failure to utilize this approval within twenty -four (24) months after its effective date
shall cause its cancellation. Please bring this letter with you if you need to come into
our office to obtain zoning compliance for any construction on the property.
Kodiak Island Borough
Royal Large
August 17, 1989
Page Two
The Commission also confirmed the findings of fact in the original variance approval in
support of their decision.
If you have any questions about the action of the Commission, please contact the
Community Development Department.
Sincerely,
Patricia Miley, Secretary
Community Development Department
G) Letter dated August 14, 1989, to Patrick Pikus and Phil Fogel
from Bob Scholze, re: Lot 5A-1, U.S. Survey 3098 - 2015 Mill
Bay Road - Storage in Airport Parking Zone.
H) Letter dated August 15, 1989, to Peter and Diedre Bailey from
Bob Scholze, re: Portion of Lot 18A, U.S. Survey 3100 - 3284
Spruce Cape - Clean-up.
I) Letter dated August 16, 1989, to Dave Imus, Mike Waller, and
Scott Arndt, Island Cable TV, from Bud Cassidy, re: Stop Work
Order - Use of Kodiak Island Borough rights-of-way (with
attachments)
AGENDA DELETIONS
X REPORTS
A) Community Development Department Monthly Status Report
B) Report on Abbreviated and Final Plats
COMMISSIONER KNUDSEN MOVED TO ACCEPT the agenda with the
additions and deletions reported by staff. The motion was seconded and
CARRIED by unanimous voice vote.
IV. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
COMMISSIONER KNUDSEN MOVED TO ACCEPT the minutes of the regular
meetings of June 21 and July 19, 1989 and the Special Meeting of July 26,
1989, as presented. The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous
voice vote.
V. AUDIENCE COMMENTS AND APPEARANCE REQUESTS
There were no audience comments.
A) Case 88-046. Request for a two (2) year extension of a
iirOviously approved variance from Section 17.24.040(A)(1) (Yards) of
the Borough Code permitting the construction of a storage building on
an existing foundation that encroaches eighteen (18) feet into the
required thirty (30) foot front yard setback in an I--Industrial Zoning
District. Tract D-1 of Tract A, Bells Flats Alaska Subdivision; 142
Sargent Creek Road. (Royal Large)
P & Z Minutes: August 16, 1989
Staff recommended that the Commission grant a two (2) year extension
of this previously approved variance. In addition, staff requested that
the Commission clarify the intent of the original condition of approval.
COMMISSIONER KNUDSEN MOVED TO GRANT a two (2) year
extension of a previously approved variance from Section
17.24.040(A)(1) of the Borough Code permitting the construction of a
storage building on an existing foundation that encroaches eighteen
(18) feet into the required thirty foot front yard setback in an I--Industrial
Zoning District on Tract D-1 of Tract A, Bells Flats Alaska Subdivision;
and to confirrn the findings of fact in the original variance approval.
Page 2 of 20
The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous voice vote.
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
1. Access to and parking for the proposed structure shall be
prohibited adjacent to Sargent Creek Road and in front of the
proposed structure. The intent of this condition is to prohibit a
loading dock and/or parking in front of the building adjacent to
Sargent Creek Road.
B) Request for Planning and Zoning Commission review in accordance
with Section 17.33.020 (Permitted Uses) of the Borough Code, of a
detailed site plan depicting a proposed neighborhood park/playground
development to be located in the PL--Public Use Lands Zoning District.
Lot 1A, Tract A, U.S. Survey 3465. (Kodiak Island Borough)
Staff recommended that the Commission approve this site plan as
being consistent with the requirements of the Borough Zoning Code,
specifically Chapter 17.57. Parking and Chapter 17.33 PL--Public Use
Lands.
A discussion ensued among the Commissioners, the Resource
Management Officer, and the Community Development Director,
regarding off-street parking and traffic circulation.
COMMISSIONER KNUDSEN MOVED TO APPROVE the site plan
depicting a proposed neighborhood park/playground development to be
located in the PL--Public Use Lands Zoning District on Lot 1A, Tract A,
U.S. Survey 3465, finding that the plan is consistent with the applicable
provisions of the zoning code, specifically Sections 17.33 and 17.57.
The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous voice call vote.
There were no further audience comments or appearance requests.
VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A) Case 89-043. Request for review by the Planning and Zoning
Commission in accordance with Sections 18.20.030 (Review by
Planning Commission--Assembly Approval) and 18.20.1006 (Disposal
for Fair Market Value) of the Borough Code of a disposal by easement
of Borough land for less than fair market value to the Kodiak Electric
Association to provide a forty (40) foot electrical easement to allow for
the installation of a three (3) phase overhead electrical distribution line
to replace the existing underground lines. Portion of Section 13,
Township 27 South, Range 20 West Seward Meridian; generally
located downstream from Monashka Creek Dam. (Kodiak Island
Borough/Kodiak Electric Association)
LINDA FREED indicated 6 public hearing notices were mailed and none
were returned. Staff recommended that the Planning and Zoning
Commission recommend that the Borough Assembly approve of the
disposal of this property to the Kodiak Electric Association.
Regular Session Closed.
Public Hearing Opened:
P & Z Minutes: August 16, 1889 Page 3 of 20
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
RE:
ITEM V-A
Kodiak Island Borough
MEMORANDUM
August 2, 1989
Planning and Zoning Commission
Community Development Department
Information for the August 16, 1989 Regular Meeting
Case 88-046. Request for a two (2) year extension of a previously
approved variance from Section 17.24.040(A)(1) (Yards) of the Borough
Code permitting the construction of a storage building on an existing
foundation that encroaches eighteen (18) feet into the required thirty (30)
foot front yard setback in an I--Industrial Zoning District. Tract D-1 of Tract
A, Bells Flats Alaska Subdivision; 142 Sargent Creek Road. (Royal Large)
BACKGROUND
The Planning and Zoning Commission granted the above referenced variance at the
regular meeting of August 17, 1988. Staff has included a copy of the action letter from
this original approval which shows the condition of approval and findings of fact. A site
visit to the property on August 1, 1989 indicates that the conditions on the lot are
substantially the same as when the variance was originally granted. The variance was
approved with one condition of approval as listed below:
1. Access to and parking for the proposed structure shall be prohibited adjacent to
Sargent Creek Road and in front of the proposed structure.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Commission grant a two (2) year extension of this previously
approved variance. In addition, staff requests that thecommission clarify the intent of
the original condition of approval.
Appearance Request A
Page 1 of 2 P&Z: August 16, 1989
ITEM V-A
APPROPRIATE MOTION:
Should the Commission agree with the staff recommendation, the appropriate motion is:
Move to grant a request for a two (2) year extension of a
previously approved variance from Section 17.24.040(A)(1)
of the Borough Code permitting the construction of a storage
building on an existing foundation that encroaches eighteen
(18) feet into the required thirty foot front yard setback in an
I--Industrial Zoning District on Tract D-1 of Tract A, Bells
Flats Alaska Subdivision; and to confirm the findings of fact
in the original variance approval.
Move to clarify and confirm the original condition of approval.
The intent of this condition is:
Appearance Request A
Page 2 of 2 P&Z: August 16, 1989
Royal Large
Box 2634
Kodiak, Alaska 99615
Kodiak Island Borough
710. MILL BAY ROAD
KODIAK, ALASKA 99615 -6340
PHONE (907) 486 -5736
August 18, 1988
Case 88 -046. Request for a variance from Section
17.24.040(A)(1) (Yards) of the Borough Code to permit the
construction of a storage building on an existing foundation'
that encroaches eighteen (18) feet into the required thirty
(30) foot front yard setback in an I-- Industrial Zoning
District. Tract D -1 of Tract A, Bells Flats Alaska
Subdivision; 142 Sargent Creek Road. (Royal V. Large)
Dear Mr. Large:
The Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission at their
meeting on August 17, 1988, Granted the request for the variance
cited above, subject to the following condition:
1. Access to and parking for the proposed structure shall be
prohibited adjacent to Sargent Creek Road and in front of
the proposed structure.
The Commission also adopted the following findings of fact in
support of their decision:
1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable
to the property or intended use of development, which
generally do not apply to other properties in the same land
use district.
The exceptional condition applicable to this property is the
existing foundation. While it constitutes an * ongoing
encroachment of the front yard set back requirement for the
tract, it is "grandfathered" due to its placement at the
present location prior to the adoption of current Borough
regulations.
. 2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in
Practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships.-
Strict application of the zoning ordinance would require the
proposed structure to be built farther back on the
foundation away from the front lot line. Another
alternative would be to place the whole structure elsewhere
Kodiak Island Borough
Royal. Large
August 18, 1988.
Page Two
on the tract, on a completely new foundation. Either of
these possible alternatives would result in practical
difficulties due to the loss of usable storage capability
that would have been available if the all of the original
foundation were used or by the added expense of a new
foundation located in an area consistent with the Code. As
the available alternatives would not require the removal of
the existing foundation from its current location, the
strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in
an unecessary hardship as the foundation, will still be
encroaching the front yard setback requirement.
3. The granting of the variance will not result in material
damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor
be detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare.
Granting of the variance to allow encroachment into the
setback would not damage or prejudice other properties in
the area. The Commission has granted at least one other
variance in this subdivision for a similar use of an
existing foundation for a residential development and there
are nearby uses of other facilities that are "grandfathered"
and still in use today.
4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the
obiectives of the Comprehensive Plan.
Granting of the variance will not be contrary to the
objectives of the 1982 Womens Bay Community Plan which
identifies this area as a potential site for industrial
development.
5. That actions of the applicant did riot cause special
conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being.
aought by the variancgs.
Actions of the applicant did not cause the special condition
from which relief is being sought by variance. The, existing
foundation was in place at the time the lot was purchased.
The applicant will take no action to improve the foundation
until the variance request has been decided.
Kodiak Island Borough
Royal Large
August 18, 1988
Page Three
6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a
Prohibited land use in the district involved.
Warehouse and Storage are permitted uses in the
I--Industrial Zoning District.
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT ALLOW ANY CONSTRUCTION TO BEGIN. Zoning
compliance and/or a building permit must first be obtained.
Please contact this office for further details.
An appeal of this decision may be initiated by any person or
party aggrieved by filing a written notice of appeal with the
Borough Clerk within ten days of the date of the Commission's
decision. The notice of appeal must state the specific grounds
for the appeal. Therefore, the Commission's decision will not be
final and effective until ten days following the decision.
Failure to utilize this variance within 12 months after its
effective date shall cause its cancellation. Please bring this
letter when you come to our office to obtain zoning compliance
for any construction on the lot.
If you have any questions about the action of the Commission,
please contact Duane Dvorak of the Community Development
Department. .
Sincerely,
Patricia Miley, Secretary
Community Development Department
%SS
PP 4, 1 iei,
iFiN, *
40 AO
Royal Large
Box 2634
Kodiak, Alaska 99615
Kodiak Island Borough
710 MILL BAY ROAD
KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340
PHONE (907) 486-5736
August 1, 1989
Re: Case 88-046. Request for a two (2) year extension of a previously
approved variance from Section 17.24.040A1 (Yards) of the Borough Code
permitting the construction of a storage building on an existing foundation that
encroaches eighteen (18) feet into the required thirty (30) foot front yard setback
in an I--Industrial Zoning District. Tract D-1 of Tract A, Bells Flats Alaska
Subdivision; 142 Sargent Creek Road. (Royal Large)
Dear Mr. Large:
Please be advised that the request referenced above has been scheduled for review
and action by the Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission at their
August 16, 1989 regular meeting. This meeting will begin at 7:30 p.m. in the Assembly
Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska. Attendance at this meeting is
recommended.
The week prior to the regular meeting, on Wednesday, August 9, 1989, at 7:30 p.m. in
the Borough Conference Room (#121), the Commission will hold a worksession to
review the packet material for the regular meeting. You are invited to attend this
worksession in order to respond to any questions the Commission may have regarding
this request.
If you have any questions, please call the Community Development Department at 486-
5736, extension 255.
Sincerely,
Patricia Miley, Secret
Community Development Department
Royal Large
Box 2634
Kodiak, Alaska 99615
Kodiak Island Borough
710 MILL BAY ROAD
KODIAK, ALASKA 996154340
PHONE (907) 486-5736
May 12, 1989
Re: Case 88-046. Request for a variance from Section 17.24.040A1 (Yards) of the Borough Code
to prrnit the construction of a storage building on an existing foundation that encroaches eighteen
(18) feet into the required thirty (30) foot front yard setback in an 1--Industrial Zoning District.
Tract D-1 of Tract A, Bells Flats Alaska Subdivision; 142 Sargent Creek Road.
Dear Mr. Large:
The Planning and Zoning Commission granted the variance request cited above on August 17, 1988.
Section 17.66.080 of the Kodiak Island Borough Code specifies that failure to utilize an approved variance
within twelve (12) months after its effective date shall cause its cancellation. The variance cited above
will expire on August 17, 1989.
If zoning compliance and/or a building permit for the development has not been issued on or before the
expiration date, the variance will be cancelled. Since the expiration date is quickly approaching, please
contact the Community Development Department as soon as possible so that we may assist you in
applying for the necessary permits.
If you desire further clarification, please contact the Community Development Department.
Sincerely,
Patricia Miley, Secretary
Community Development Department
/?. lealreA,/
a.s A92- a- iir/0
74,‘,./fr,
7-/z-g7
•
Royal Large
Box 2634
Kodiak, Alaska 99615
RE: Case- 88-046. Request for a variance from Section
17.24.040(A)(1) (Yards) of the Borough Code to permit the
construction of a storage building on an existing foundation'
that encroaches eighteen (18) feet into the required thirty
(30) foot front yard setback in an I--Industrial Zoning
District. Tract D-1 of Tract A, Bells Flats Alaska
Subdivision; 142 Sargent Creek Road. (Royal V. Large)
Dear Mr. Large:
Kodiak Island Borough
710 MILL BAY ROAD
KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340
PHONE (907) 486-5736
August 18, 1988
- The Kodiak Island Borough Planning and Zoning Commission at their
meeting on August '17, 1988, aranted the request for the variance
cited above, subject to the following condition: • ' '
1. . Access to and parking for the proposed 'strudture shall. be
prohibited adjacent to Sargent Creek Road and in front of
the proposed structure..
The Commission also adopted the following findings of fact in
support Of theit'decision:
Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable
to the property or intended use of -development, which
'crenerally do not apply to other properties in the same land
use district. ,
• The exceptional condition applicable to this property is. the
•
existing foundation. While it constitutes an 'ongoing.
encroachment of the front-yard set back requirement for the
tract, it Is ."grandfathered" due to its placement at the
present location-prior to the adoption of current Borough
.regulations. -
2. Strict application of the zoning ordinanbes.wouid result in
Practical.difficuities or unnecessary hardships.
' Strict application of the zoning ordinance .would require the .
. proposed structure to be : built farther ,back on. the
' foundation away Irma, the . front lot line. Another
'alternative would be to place the whole structure elsewhere
KodiakIsland Borough
Royal Large
August 18, 1988
Page Two
on the tract, on a completely new foundation. 'Either of
these possible alternatives would result in practical
difficulties clue to the loss of usable storage capability
that would have been available if the all of the original
foundation were used or by the added expense of a new
foundation located in an area consistent with the Code. As
the available alternatives would not require the removal of
the existing foundation from its current location, the
strict application of the zoning ordin.ances'would result in
an unecessary hardship as the foundation, will still be
encroaching the front yard setback requirement.
3. The granting of the variance will not result in material
damages or preiudice to other properties in the vicinity nor
be detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare.
Granting of the variance to allow encroachment into the
setback would not damage or prejudice other properties in
the area. The Commission has granted at least one other
variance in this subdivision for a similar use of an
existing foundation for a residential development and there
are nearby uses. of. other facilities that are "grandfathezed"
and still.in use today.
4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the
objectives of the Comprehensive Plan.
Granting of the variance will not be contrary to the
objectives of the 1982 Womens Bay Community Plan which
identifies this area as a potential site for industrial
development.
5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special
conditions or financial hardship from which relief is being
sought by the variance.
Actions of the applicant did not cause the special condition
from which relief is being sought by variance. The existing
foundation was in place at the time the lot was purchased.
' The applicant will take no action to improve the foundation
until the variance request has been decided.
Kodiak Island Borough
Royal Large
August 18, 1988
Page Three
6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a
prohibited land use in the district involved.
Warehouse and Storage are permitted uses in the
I--Industrial Zoning District.
THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT ALLOW ANY CONSTRUCTION TO BEGIN. Zoning
compliance and/or a building permit must first be obtained.
Please contact this office for further details.
An appeal of this decision may be initiated by any person or
party aggrieved by filing a written notice of appeal with the
Borough Clerk within ten days of the date of the Commission's
decision. The notice of appeal must state the specific grounds
for the appeal. Therefore, the Commission's decision will not be
final and effective until ten days following the decision.
Failure to utilize this variance within 12 months
effective date shall cause its cancellation. Please
letter when you come to our office to obtain zoning
for any construction on the lot.
If you have any questions about the action of the
please contact Duane Dvorak of the Community
Department.
Sincerely,
Patricia Miley, Secretary
Community Development Department
after its
bring this
compliance
Commission,
Development
4 opposing, and 2 expressing non - objection to this
request. Staff recommended approval of this request.
A discussion ensued among the Commissioners and the
consensus of the Commission was that this request
should have at least two (2) public hearings to gather
public testimony, and that this would be an
informational hearing only.
Regular Session Closed.
Public Hearing Opened:
REMEGIO MARASIGAN appeared before the Commission and
expressed opposition to this request.
BARTOLOME NAVIDAD appeared before the Commission and
expressed his feelings about this request.
NORM STEARNS appeared before the Commission and
expressed opposition to this request.
SCOTT ARNDT, representing Dennis Murray, appeared
before the Commission and asked if Mr. Murray's public
hearing notice response was copied for the Commission.
CHAIRMAN RENNELL responded "yes."
ROBERT FRYE appeared before the Commission' and
expressed opposition to this request.
Public Hearing Closed.
Regular Session Opened.
COMMISSIONER ANDERSON MOVED TO TABLE Case 88 -045 for
another public hearing at the September 21, 1988
regular meeting. The motion was seconded and CARRIED
by unanimous roll call vote.
D) Case 88 -046. Request for a variance from Section
17.24.040(A)(1) (Yards) of the Borough Code to permit
the construction of a storage building on an existing
foundation that encroaches eighteen (18) feet into the
required thirty (30) foot front yard setback. Tract
D -1 of Tract A, Bells Flats Alaska Subdivision; 142
Sargent Creek Road. (Royal V. Large)
DUANE DVORAK indicated 15 public hearing notices were
mailed for this case and 1 was returned, opposing this
request. Staff recommended approval of this request.
Regular Session Closed.
Public Hearing Opened:
Seeing and hearing none.
Public Hearing Closed.
Regular Session Opened.
COMMISSIONER ANDERSON MOVED TO GRANT a request for a
variance from Section 17.24.040(A)(1) of the Borough
Code to permit the construction of a storage building
on an existing foundation that encroaches eighteen (18)
feet into the required thirty (30) foot front yard
setback in an I-- Industrial Zoning District on Tract D1
of Tract A, Bells Flats Alaska Subdivision; and to
adopt the findings of fact contained in the revised
staff memorandum dated August 12, 1988. The motion was
seconded.
COMMISSIONER ANDERSON MOVED TO AMEND THE MAIN MOTION by
adding the following condition:
Page 9 of 27 .. P &Z Minutes: August 17, 1988
Access to and parking for the proposed structure
shall be prohibited adjacent to Sargent Creek Road
and in front of the proposed structure.
The AMENDMENT was. seconded and CARRIED by unanimous
voice vote.
The question was called and the MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED
CARRIED by unanimous voice vote.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions
applicable to the property or intended use of
development, which generally do not apply to other
properties in the same land use district.
The exceptional condition applicable to this
property is the existing foundation. While it
constitutes an ongoing encroachment of the front
yard set back requirement for the tract, it is
"grandfathered" due to its placement at the
present location prior to the adoption of current
Borough regulations.
2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would
result in practical difficulties or unnecessary
hardships.
Strict application of the zoning ordinance would
require the proposed structure to be built farther
back on the foundation away from the front lot
line. Another alternative would be to place the
whole structure elsewhere on the tract, on a
completely new foundation. Either of these
possible alternatives would result in practical
difficulties due to the loss of usable storage
capability that would have been available if the
all of the original foundation were used or by the
added expense of a new foundation located in an
area consistent with the Code. As the available
alternatives would not require the removal of the
existing foundation from its current location, the
strict application of the zoning ordinances would
result in an unnecessary hardship as the
foundation, will still be encroaching the front
yard setback requirement.
The granting of the variance will not result in
material damages or prejudice to other properties
in the vicinity nor be detrimental to the public's
health, safety and welfare.
Granting of the variance to allow encroachment
into the setback would not damage or prejudice
other properties in the area. The Commission has
granted at least one other variance in this
subdivision for a similar use of an existing
foundation for a residential development and there
are nearby uses of other facilities that are
"grandfathered" and still in use today.
4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary
to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan.
Granting of the variance will not be contrary to
the objectives of the 1982 Womens Bay Community
Plan which identifies this area as a potential
site for industrial development.
Page 10 of 27 P &Z Minutes: August 17, 1988
5. That actions of the applicant did not cause
special conditions or financial hardship from
which relief is being sought by the variance.
Actions of the applicant did not cause the special
condition from which relief is being sought by
variance. The existing foundation was in place at
the time the lot was purchased. The applicant
will take no action to improve the foundation
until the variance request has been decided.
6. That the arantina of the variance will not permit
a prohibited land use in the district involved.
Warehouse and Storage are permitted uses in the
I-- Industrial Zoning District.
E) Case 88 -047. Request for a variance from Section
17.57.020(D) (Off- Street Parking) of the Borough Code
to allow either (A) both a forty -two (42) bed jail
facility (on Lots 122 through 126, Block 10, Erskine
Subdivision) and a homeless shelter (on Lot 2, Block
15, Kodiak Townsite) to provide only one hundred
twenty -eight (128) off- street parking spaces instead of
the required one hundred forty -five (145) off - street
parking spaces in a PL-- Public Use Lands Zoning
District; or
(B) a forty -two (42) bed jail facility to provide
only one hundred thirty -six (136) off - street parking
spaces instead of the required one hundred thirty -nine
(139) off - street parking spaces in a PL-- Public Use
Lands Zoning District. Lots 122 through 126, Block 10,
Erskine Subdivision; 215, 217, 219, 311, and 315 Mill
Bay Road. (City of Kodiak)
DUANE DVORAK indicated 49 public hearing notices were
mailed for this case and 3 were returned, 1 in favor
and 2 expressing non - objection to this request. Staff
recommended approval of this request.
Regular Session Closed.
Public Hearing Opened:
GORDON GOULD, City Manager, appeared before the
Commission and expressed support for this request,
. stating that the City Council preferred alternative
(A) .
FRANCES. CATER appeared before the Commission and
expressed support for this request. Ms. Cater stated
that the Shelter Board preferred alternative (A).
Public Hearing Closed.
Regular Session Opened.
COMMISSIONER HENDEL MOVED TO GRANT a request for a
variance from Section 17.57.020 of the Borough Code to
permit the construction of a forty -two (42) bed jail
facility (on Block 10A, Erskine Subdivision) and a
shelter for the homeless (on Lot 2, Block 15, Kodiak
Townsite) which will only provide one hundred
twenty -eight (128) off - street parking spaces instead of
the required one hundred forty -six (146) off - street
parking spaces in a PL-- Public Use Lands and a
B -- Business Zoning Districts subject to the conditions
of approval contained in the revised staff memorandum
dated August 16, 1988 and to adopt the findings lA
through 6A contained in the revised staff memorandum
dated August 16, 1988 as "Findings of Fact" for this
case. The motion was seconded and CARRIED by unanimous
roll call vote.
Page 11 of 27 P &Z Minutes: August 17, 1988
KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTM1
710 Mill Bay Road
Kodiak, Alaska 99615
ITEM VI —D
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
A public hearing will be held on Wednesday, August 17,
1988. The meeting will begin at 7:30 p.m. in the
Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak,
Alaska, before the Kodiak Island Borough Planning and
Zoning Commission, to hear comments, if any, on the
following request:
Case 88-046. Request for a variance from Section
17.24.040(A)(1) (Yards) of the Borough Code to permit
_the construption of _a_storage_building on--an exIsting---
foundation that encroaches eighteen (18) feet into the
required thirty (30) foot front yard setback. Tract D-1
of Tract A, Bells Flats Alaska Subdivision; 142 Sargent
Creek Road. (Royal V. Large)
RECEIVED
AUG 171988
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
If you do not wish to testify verbally, you may provide your comments in the
space below, or in a letter to the Community Development Department prior to
the meeting.
You are being notified because you are a property owner in the area of the
.
request. If you have any questions about the request, please call us at
486-5736, extension 255.
Your Name: f‘l es Mailing Address: 2c, A ac)
_ —
Your property dee.c.r_iptionl-__ a BtocJ<
ZONING KEY
RESIDENTIAL R-I
0 RESIDENTIAL_ R -2
RESIDENTIAL R -3
j RURAL ,—,RESIDENTIAL
BUSINESS is
INDUSTRIAL
CONSERVATION
PUBLIC USE LANDS
-WATERSHED
FEET
MILES
0
JITEM VI -D
Kodiak Island Borough
R E V I S E D M E M O R A N D U M
DATE:' August 12, 1988
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
SUBJECT: Information for the August 17, 1988 Regular Meeting
RE:
Case 88 -046. Request for a variance from Section
17.24.040(A)(1) ,(Yards) of the Borough Code to permit the
construction of a storage building on an existing
foundation that encroaches eighteen (18) feet into the
required thirty (30) foot front yard setback. Tract D -1
of Tract A, Bells Flats Alaska Subdivision; 142 Sargent
Creek Road. (Royal V. Large)
Fifteen (15) public hearing notices were distributed on July 29,
1988.
Date of site visit: August 4, 1988
1. Applicant: Royal Large
2. Land Owner: Same.
3. Request: For a variance from Section 17.24.040(A)(1)
(Yards) of the Borough Code to permit the
construction, of a storage building on an
existing foundation that encroaches eighteen
(18) feet into the required thirty (30) foot
front yard setback.
4. Existing Zoning: I-- Industrial
5. Zoning History: The 1968 Comprehensive Plan did not
identify zoning in the Bells Flats area.
Rezoned from unclassified to I-- Industrial
by Ordinance 69 -30 -0.
6. Location:
Physical: 142 Sargent Creek Road
Legal: Tract D -1 of Tract A, Bells Flats Alaska
Subdivision
7. Lot Size: 1.38 acres
8. Existing Land Use: Vacant
Revised Report 88 -046
1 P &Z: August 17, 1988
ITEM VI -D
9. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
North: Tract D-2 of Tract A, Bells Flats Subdivision
Use: Warehouse and Outdoor Storage
Zoning: I--Industrial
South: Block 4, Tract A, Bells Flats Subdivision
Use: Slaughterhouse and related activities
Zoning: I--Industrial
East: Block 3, Tract A, Bells Flats Subdivision
Use: Asphalt Batch Plant and Outdoor Storage
Zoning: I--Industrial
West: Unsurveyed Portion, U.S. Survey 2539
Use: Vacant
Zoning: C--Conservation
10. Comprehensive Plan: The 1968 Comprehensive Plan does not
address this area.
11. Applicable Regulations: The following sections of Title 17
(Zoning) of the Borough Code are
applicable to this request:
17.24.040 Yards.
A. Front Yards.
1. There shall be a front yard of not less than thirty
feet.
COASTAL MANAGEMENT APPLICABLE POLICIES
Industrial Development
1. Optimum Location. In order to satisfy industrial requirements,
meet safety standards, protect fish and wildlife resources, and
maintain environmental quality, sites for industrial
development shall be identified in conjunction with the Kodiak
Island Borough.
Consistent: Not Applicable. This area was identified for
industrial use prior to this requirement.
2. Natural Features. Dredge and fill, excavation, shoreline
alterateration, and disturbance of anadromous streams,
tideflats and wetlands shall be minimized when constructing and
operating port, harbor, dock, industrial and energy facilities
- if permitted under applicable regulations.
Consistent: Not Applicable. This action does not involve
any dredge and fill activities along the
shoreline.
Revised Report 88-046
2 P&Z: August 17, 1988
ITEM VI -D
3. Natural Setting, Views and Access. Development shall be
conducted in a manner that mitigates adverse impacts upon the
Kodiak Archipelago; developers shall provide opportunities for
public access to the shoreline and scenic views, to the extent
feasible and prudent.
Consistent: Not Applicable. This action does not affect the
Kodiak Archipelago nor does it involve altering
scenic views or public access to the shoreline.
4. Dredge and Excavation Material. Dredging and filling shall be
consistent with ACMP Standards 6 AAC 80.040 (Coastal
Development) and 6 AAC 80.110 (Mineral and Mining Processing).
Dredge spoil may be utilized in shoreside landfills if
permitted under applicable regulations for the purpose of
creating usable waterfront land.
Consistent: Not Applicable. This action does not involve
any dredging and filling activities.
5. Facility Design. Developments in or over the water, such as
piers, docks, and protective structures shall be located,
designed and maintained in a manner that prevents adverse
impacts upon water quality, fish, wildlife, and vegetative
resources, and minimizes interruption of water circulation
patterns, coastal processes and navigation.
Consistent: Not Applicable. This action does not involve
development in or over the water.
6. Buffer Zones. Buffer zones shall be established to the extent
feasible and prudent, between industrial areas and major public
transportation routes and between industrial developement and
adjacent, non - industrial properties in order to minimize
conflicts between land uses.
Consistent: Not Applicable. The land use at this location
was established prior to this requirement.
7. Accessory Development. Accessory development that does not
require a shoreline location in order to carry out its support
functions shall be sited away from the shoreline whenever there
is a feasible and prudent inland alternative. This category
includes parking, warehousing, open air storage, waste storage,
treatment or storm runoff control facilities and utilities.
Consistent: Not Applicable. This action does not involve
accessory development along the shoreline.
8. Wetlands. Filling and drainage of water bodies, floodways,
backshores or natural wetlands shall be consistent with ACMP
Revised Report 88 -046 3 P &Z: August 17, 1988
ITEM VI -D
Standards 6 AAC 80.070 (Energy Facilities) and 6 AAC 80.130
(Habitats).
Consistent: Not Applicable. This action does not involve
any fill or drainage of water bodies.
COMMENTS:
The purpose of this request is to permit the construction of a
storage building on an existing foundation that encroaches eighteen
(18) feet into the required thirty (30) foot front yard setback
requirement. Upon investigation of the site and a review of aerial
photographs for the area, it appeared that the foundation which is
the subject of this case was actually in the Sargent Creek Road
right-of-way. The applicant has provided a certified "as-built"
survey for the area that shows the position of the foundation as
originally stated at the time of application.
In order for the Commission to grant a variance, all of the
following conditions must be satisfied:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to
the property or intended use of development, which generally do
not apply to other properties in the same land use district.
The exceptional condition applicable to this property is the
existing foundation. While it constitutes an ongoing
encroachment of the front yard set back requirement for the
tract, it is "grandfathered" due to its placement at the
present location prior to the adoption of current Borough
regulations.
2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in
practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships.
Strict application of the zoning ordinance would require the
proposed structure to be built farther back on the foundation
away from the front lot line. Another alternative would be to
place the whole structure elsewhere on the tract, on a
completely new foundation. Either of these possible
alternatives would result in practical difficulties due to the
loss of usable storage capability that would have been
available if the all of the original foundation were used or by
the added expense of a new foundation located in an area
consistent with the Code. As the available alternatives would
not require the removal of the existing foundation from its
current location, the strict application of the zoning
ordinances would result in an unecessary hardship as the
foundation, will still be encroaching the front yard setback
requirement.
Revised Report 88-046 4 P&Z: August 17, 1988
ITEM VI -D
3. The granting of the variance will not result in material
damages or prejudice to other properties in the vicinity nor be
detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare.
Granting of the variance to allow encroachment into the setback
would not damage or prejudice other properties in the area.
The Commission has granted at least one other variance in this
subdivision for a similar use of an existing foundation for a
residential development and there are nearby uses of other
facilities that are'"grandfathered" and still in use today.
4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the
obiectives of the Comprehensive Plan.
Granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives
of the 1982 Womens Bay Community Plan which identifies this
area as a potential site for industrial development.
5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions
or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the
variance.
Actions of the applicant did not cause the special condition
from which relief is being sought by variance. The existing
foundation was in place at the time the lot was purchased. The
applicant will take no action to improve the foundation until
the variance request has been decided.
6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited
land use in the district involved.
Warehouse and Storage are permitted uses in the I--Industrial
Zoning District.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff finds this request does meet all the conditions necessary for
a variance to be granted under Chapter 17.66 (Variance) of the
Borough Code.
APPROPRIATE MOTION:
Should the Commission agree with the staff recommendation, the
appropriate motion is:
Move to grant a request for a variance from Section
17.24.040(A)(1) of the Borough Code to permit the construction
of a storage building on an existing foundation that encroaches
eighteen (18) feet into the required thirty (30) foot front
yard setback in an I--Industrial Zoning District on Tract D1 of
Tract A, Bells Flats Alaska Subdivision; and to adopt the
findings of fact contained in the revised staff memorandum
dated August 12, 1988.
Revised Report 88-046
P&Z: August 17, 1988
rrr' rriiri4 irr• "0r'r�s � ♦+r'r rr i►r♦+ •r"
ror'r
ri
r4 ♦ r rr
, «�
ow. 4,-4.
t►yi. ...
.-
r
'ir►i�►i♦rrrir'�►+♦�i r .i'rir�rii rirw r ry ►+ r4► ri44
mii►r.* r♦�♦� i ♦ ♦o♦rr
:0►4. ...�� ►9r� 4rrii♦i�ri rr i ► ♦ �r: ►rr�: ♦rrrr�D4 4.44+"
►C♦r
.04 it r ♦r rrr4 i♦4 wry4 r rrri��* rr4r,o ::::;::::::.:.?A.14''.\ '4'►rrrr rr♦r'♦rri♦�♦�i♦♦,°r♦rrrir�►♦r,r
pi,
r . 4. . b
z j,4'r •
i .y i • r% 411. ►. ♦
Case 88 -046 Tract D -1 of Tract A
Bells Flats
Alaska d
142 Sargent Road
Bfi R -1000'
ZONING KEY
El RESIDENTIAL R-t
RESIDENTIAL R -2
D RESIDENTIAL R -3
RURAL RESIDENTIAL
BUSINESS
INDUSTRIAL
CONSERVATION
PUBLIC USE LANDS
■ WATERSHED
Kodiak Island Borough
MEMORANDUM
DATEi( August 9, 1988
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Community Development Department
SUBJECT: Information for the August 17, 1988 Regular Meeting
' 'ITEM VI -U
RE:
Case 88-046. Request for a variance from Section
17.24.040(A)(1) (Yards) of the Borough Code to permit the
construction of a storage building on an existing
foundation that encroaches eighteen (18) feet into the
required thirty (30) foot front yard setback. Tract D-1
of Tract A, Bells Flats Alaska Subdivision; 142 Sargent
Creek Road. (Royal V. Large)
Fifteen (15) public hearing notices were distributed on July 29,
1988.
Date of site visit: August 4, 1988
1. Applicant: Royal Large
2. Land Owner: Same.
3. Request: For a variance from Section 17.24.040(A)(1)
(Yards) of the Borough Code to permit the
construction of a storage building on an
existing foundation that encroaches eighteen
(18) feet into the required thirty (30) foot
front yard setback.
4. Existing Zonina: I--Industrial
5. Zoning History: The 1968 Comprehensive Plan did not
identify zoning in the Bells Flats area.
Rezoned from unclassified to I--Industrial
by Ordinance 69-30-0.
6. Location:
Physical: 142 Sargent Creek Road
Legal: Tract D-1 of Tract A, Bells Flats Alaska
Subdivision
7. Lot Size: 1.38 acres
8. Existing Land Use: Vacant
Case 88-046
1 of 6 P&Z: August 17, 1988
-`ITEM VI -D
9. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
North: Tract D -2 of Tract A, Bells Flats Subdivision
Use: Warehouse and Outdoor Storage
Zoning: I -- Industrial
South: Block 4, Tract A, Bells Flats Subdivision
Use: Slaughterhouse and related activities
Zoning: I-- Industrial
East: Block 3, Tract A, Bells Flats Subdivision
Use: Asphalt Batch Plant and Outdoor Storage
Zoning: I -- Industrial
West: Unsurveyed Portion, U.S. Survey 2539
Use: Vacant
Zoning: C -- Conservation
10. Comprehensive.Plan:
The 1968 Comprehensive Plan does not
address this area. The 1982 Womens
Bay Community Plan states, "industrial
land use will remain on the Bells
Flats Subdivision side of the
community but in an area of decreased
size. Industrial uses will consist of
the Livestock Association's
Slaughterhouse, Brechan Enterprises'
gravel and asphalt operations, and
Royal Large's warehouse operation..."
[emphasis added]
11. Applicable Regulations: The following sections of Title 17
(Zoning) of the Borough Code are
applicable to this request:
17.24.040 Yards.
A. Front Yards.
1. There shall be a front yard of not less than thirty
feet.
COASTAL MANAGEMENT APPLICABLE POLICIES
Industrial Development
1. Optimum Location. In order to satisfy industrial
requirements, meet safety standards, protect fish and
wildlife resources, and maintain environmental quality,
sites for industrial development shall be identified in
conjunction with the Kodiak Island Borough.
Consistent: Not Applicable. This area was identified
for industrial use prior to this
requirement.
Case 88 -046
2 of 6 P &Z: August 17, 1988
- ITEM VI-D
2. Natural Features. Dredge and fill, excavation, shoreline
alteration, and disturbance of anadromous streams,
tideflats and wetlands shall be minimized when
constructing and operating port, harbor, dock, industrial
and energy facilities - if permitted under applicable
regulations.
Consistent: Not Applicable. This action does not
involve any dredge and fill activities
along the shoreline.
3. Natural Setting, Views and Access. Development shall be
conducted in a manner that mitigates adverse impacts upon
the Kodiak Archipelago; developers shall provide
opportunities for public access to the shoreline and
scenic views, to the extent feasible and prudent.
Consistent: Not Applicable. This action does not
affect the Kodiak Archipelago nor does it
involve altering scenic views or public
access to the shoreline.
4. Dredge and Excavation Material. Dredging and filling
shall be consistent with ACMP Standards 6 AAC 80.040
(Coastal Development) and 6 AAC 80.110 (Mineral and Mining
Processing). Dredge spoil may be utilized in shoreside
landfills if permitted under applicable regulations for
the purpose of creating usable waterfront land.
Consistent: Not Applicable. This action does not
involve any dredging and filling
activities.
5. Facility Design. Developments in or over the water, such
as piers, docks, and protective structures shall be
located, designed and maintained in a manner that prevents
adverse impacts upon water quality, fish, wildlife and
vegetative resources, and minimizes interruption of water
circulation patterns, coastal processes and navigation.
Consistent: Not Applicable. This action does not
involve development in or over the water.
6. Buffer Zones. Buffer zones shall be established to the
extent feasible and prudent, between industrial areas and
major public transportation routes and between industrial
development and adjacent, non-industrial properties in
order to minimize conflicts between land uses.
Consistent: Not Applicable. The land use at this
location was established prior to this
requirement.
Case 88-046
3 of 6 P&Z: August 17, 1988
ITEM VI -D
7. Accessory Development. Accessory development that does
not require a shoreline location in order to carry out its
support functions shall be sited away from the shoreline
whenever there is a feasible and prudent inland
alternative. This category includes parking, warehousing,
open air storage, waste storage, treatment or storm runoff
control facilities and utilities.
Consistent: Not Applicable. This action does not
involve accessory development along the
shoreline.
8. Wetlands. Filling and drainage of water bodies,
floodways, backshores or natural wetlands shall be
consistent with ACMP Standards 6 AAC 80.070 (Energy
Facilities) and 6 AAC 80.130 (Habitats).
Consistent: Not Applicable. This action does not
involve any fill or drainage of water
bodies.
COMMENTS:
The purpose of this request is to permit the construction of a
storage building on an existing foundation that encroaches eighteen
(18) feet into the required thirty (30) foot front yard setback
requirement. Upon investigation of the site and a review of aerial
Photographs for the area, it appears that the foundation which is
the subiect of this case may actually be in the Sargent Creek Road
right -of -way. At the very least, based upon the known margin of
error for the aerial photograph, the foundation may be encroaching
a full thirty (30) feet into the required thirty (30) foot front
yard setback requirement. It appears as though the measurements may
have been taken from the road surface itself or very near to it,
rather than from the property line.
In order for the Commission to grant a variance, all of the
following conditions must be satisfied:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Exceptional physical circumstances or conditions applicable to
the property or intended use of development, which generally do
not apply to other properties in the same land use district.
The exceptional condition applicable to this property is the
existing foundation. While it constitutes an ongoing
encroachment of the front yard set back requirement for the
tract, it is "grandfathered" due to its placement at the
present location prior to the adoption of current Borough
regulations.
Case 88 -046
4 of 6 P &Z: August 17, 1988
ITEM VI-D
2. Strict application of the zoning ordinances would result in
Practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships.
Strict application of the zoning ordinance would require the
proposed structure to be built farther back on the foundation
away from the front lot line. Another alternative would be to
place the whole structure elsewhere on the tract, on a
completely new foundation. Either of these possible
alternatives would result in practical difficulties due to the
loss of usable storage capability that would have been
available if the all of the original foundation were used or by
the added expense of a new foundation located in an area
consistent with the Code. As the available alternatives would
not require the removal of the existing foundation from its
current location, the strict application of the zoning
ordinances would result in an unnecessary hardship as the
foundation, will still be encroaching the front yard setback
requirement.
3. The granting of the variance will not result in material
damages or pre-judice to other properties in the vicinity nor be
detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare.
Granting of the variance to allow encroachment into the setback
would not damage or prejudice other properties in the area.
The Commission has granted at least one other variance in this
subdivision for a similar use of an existing foundation for a
residential development and there are nearby uses of other
facilities that are "grandfathered" and still in use today.
4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the
objectives of the Comprehensive Plan.
Granting of the variance will not be contrary to the objectives
of the comprehensive plan which identifies this area as a
potential site for industrial development.
5. That actions of the applicant did not cause special conditions
or financial hardship from which relief is being sought by the
variance.
Actions of the applicant did not cause the special condition
from which relief is being sought by variance. The existing
foundation was in place at the time the lot was purchased.
6. That the granting of the variance will not permit a prohibited
land use in the district involved.
Warehouse and Storage are petiuitted uses in the I--Industrial
Zoning District.
Case 88-046
5 of 6 P&Z: August 17, 1988
-ITEM VI -D
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff finds that there in insufficient information to determine if
this request does meet all the conditions necessary for a variance
to be granted under Chapter 17.66 (Variance) of the Borough Code.
Therefore, staff recommends that this case be tabled until the
applicant can provide an as built survey of the foundation with
regard to the Sargent Creek Road right-of-way and the lot line of
the tract owned by the applicant.
APPROPRIATE MOTION:
Should the Commission agree with the staff recommendation, the
appropriate motion is:
Move to table Case 88-046 until the regular Planning and Zoning
Commission meeting on September 21, 1988, for the purpose of
obtaining further information (as-built survey) with which to
complete the analysis of this request and determine the extent
of the variance requested from Section 17.24.040 (A)(1) of the
Borough Code.
Case 88-046
6 of 6 P&Z: August 17, 1988
Royal Large
Box 2634
Kodiak, Alaska 99615
Kodiak Island Borough
710 MILL BAY ROAD
KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340
PHONE (907) 486-5736
July 29, 1988
Case 88-046. Request for a variance from Section
17.24.040(A)(1) (Yards) of the Borough Code to permit the
construction of a storage building on an existing foundation
that encroaches eighteen (18) feet into the required thirty
(30) foot front yard setback. Tract D-1 of Tract A, Bells
Flats Alaska Subdivision; 142 Sargent Creek Road. (Royal V.
Large)
Dear Mr. Large:
Please be advised that the above-referenced request has been
scheduled for review and action by the Planning and Zoning
Commission at their August 17, 1988 regular meeting. This
meeting will begin at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough Assembly Chambers,
710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak, Alaska. Attendance at this meeting is
recommended.
The week pribr to the regular meeting, on Wednesday, August 10,
1988, at 7:30 p.m. in the Borough conference room, the Commission
will hold a worksession to review the packet material for the
regular meeting. You are invited to attend this worksession in
order to respond to any questions the Commission may have
regarding this request.
If you have any questions, please call the Community Development
Department at 486-5736, extension 255.
Sincerely,
Patricia Miley, Secretary
Community Development Department
•
kuDiAK ISL1 D COR(:l;OH
POST OFFICE BOX 1246
KODIAK, ALASKA 99615
) Conditional Use Permit
) Exception
(4 Variance
( ) Zoning Change: From: To:
CODE SECTION INVOLVED: /1- , a 0e/C)
NOTE: The application fee for all items covered by this form is $50.
Conditional Use Permits, Exceptions, and Variance Applications also require
the submission of a site plan.
APPLICANT: Rod ( a v2 y'
Narne
Aa%,/ t7x 2 7"
Address
/(Z /t /f/f' EZ Gi�i S
City, State, Zip
PROPERT'(: (.(rce4- " O ,c Y z - c _ +
mfr- ems•
Home Telephone
Lot Block
Work Telephone
Ict f s
Su 6 c= 6R-co
Subdivision Name
United States Survey = Section, Township, Range, S.M.
PRESENT USE OF PROPERT'(:
PROPOSED USE OF PROPERT'(: (0613(cQ Wet -e_, -;D
��Y� �• 1 i (A 7 GL. (IAA_ S i�l, t rv�CSC &* Site
( / `ECI , �iuC � D � e-S (% f 0 &e.1— Cup-( ; tir” Jc tc,
r
I have been advised of the procedures ir.. ;ol vea with this request and have
received a copy of the appropriate :•e ^:«t;cns.
Ytr�'jy� �N-,vim ,
h
Au. . crized nCerr Date Prope y Owner. n Date
Data Application Acceptea: 7— /s=45` 3Y:
• r
3
„,,,.......—....e..i............,,..„ ...,
1 t OP , •
'.."...."".."."."....."4".4. % "'''''.."'.....--.........., .............^.^.••••••,. ...
1 . -
..,,,,7,_;„...........4.,t.„, .
/lop llo MP ;d4 461.17 .
( e S 10. 0
Telviv-PditAP
----t-- , (2/ ..,y
morournrrnve,rworwww!amokrmeramoarroarsore.wmmat..nn.i,ranta
dr' el 01,/
`e 317.2 0
.1104. . wt. r■
. ..'"........41..........„ ,„ ' -;,,R, . 1
,,.... —....',";;;Kr•,
•ffi"''''''•• ..-,,,t;
',kr 0, ve !,:.'? ,,,,•• 4)
ell
4411
Nta., p e• atm '• (, IS
'''''''"....., ...•.:•,...
1
•
..114,1971111.11.MIC1.12161(."116711:17...1,14.1f rarr.I.IIM.`0621,3=41,9119...1111111:173IIR.S. 11111.01M2.111,111IP
370 leSil
,o,'"'N •
.o!,)
. . . ' •
• . . • .
. ;
1 •
y-
-
-
_
_
,,_
-
CASH RECEIPT
...-odiak Island Borough 1 3 5 1 (3
710 UPPER MILL BAY ROAD
KODIAK, ALASKA 99615-6340
PHONE (907) 486-5736
DATE 19E4t.'.
CONDITIONS OF CHECK PAYMENTS TOTAL
PAYMENTS TENDERED BY CHECK FOR OBLIGATIONS DUE TO
7HE BOROUGH ARE SATISFIED ONLY UPON THE CHECK BEING
HONORED, RETURNED CHECKS FOR ANY REASON RESTORES THE OBLIGATION AS
UNPAID AND SUBJECTS THE PAYER TO ANY CHARGES, FEES OR OTHER LEGAL
LIABILITIES A5 MAY BE APPLICABLE.
CASHIER
es
PAYOR
PAYMENT MADE BY:
likCHECK NO. J/6, 2
1E1 CASH
111 OTHER
FM00-511815
KODIAK ISLAND BOROUGH
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTME
710 Mill Bay Road
Kodiak, Alaska 99615 ITEM VI-D
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
A public hearing will be held on Wednesday. A4auSt 17,
1988. The meeting will begin at 7:30 p.m. in the
Borough Assembly Chambers, 710 Mill Bay Road, Kodiak,
Alaska, before the Kodiak Island Borough Planning and
zoning Commission, to hear comments, if any, on the
following request:
Case 88-046. Request for a variance from Section
17.24.040(A)(1) (Yards) of the Borough Code to permit
the construction of a storage building on an existing
foundation that encroaches eighteen (18) feet into the
required thirty (30) foot front yard setback. Tract D-1
of Tract A, Bells Flats Alaska Subdivision; 142 Sargent
Creek Road. (Royal V. Large)
If you do not wish to testify verbally, you may provide your comments in the
space below, or in a letter to the Community Development Department prior to
the meeting.
**You are being notified because you are a property owner in the area of the
request. , If you have any questions about the request, please call us.at
486-5736, extension 255.
Your Name:
Your property description:
• Comments:
Mailing Address:
■
-:
A� +s Allir �•
Ile,. ,.rte +Ic
.. �; ................. t�r ..IA1 ♦r.♦f1i
............ '�'I.ijlf Ii'.♦I'i1. !'•i 'Ia••;.M +1� +1j+'.♦� ♦�...
tii�'�•♦♦. ♦�.j %fift+i.I a +il�aa..yj. %....... %....
1 ♦y 1 uy f .I
Bey .y .1 •s •. Iiy b - "''►ty .,. ;yiy I,.ISr.i Iy+..r
I�.j1.1�., ..1 •4�.4 +f ;1 +.f♦...�•f1+. ;�Ts111�11I.
f��i 4� �.I+ j1«r� ► r y�►f1#1��,♦
t.�Ir�Ir� ,.w +1t +qk �1•1j. +'11 + +r + +a1��' i.�+•I..f +f +++ '1t 1+ +'�.
1 +.j'lf ++I•
af1 ; ~• +�• *A ►�+ ♦� + ++a�r•fr..+.i♦yam +' +r+�a. �a.�I �'h►I'�if• +a,.1ai♦Iya+y + +! � +a♦ « ir•I+ ; ++a, aa.If,.•,�, + •.• a• +ra �1 yam+ ♦ +i
yo• ♦4Aq i
r.
RE7,tig�'
ftsol
s ck°
%N
r'
•+.
AP Jr.
•
6 Z D -1 I tact
B e1. � s Ilat haest
gasgeoc
RSouab n
v
Q
a
;,� ;' ::TR.E
i ii ��1 �i•� i 1141 ��i :41(4.42 o_
j--e-i i•- • ii i ��i-� i � i.10$4 .1:
ti i rii •
littlai 41:1‘13411;301.14Witliiiii 1,... i i i ijjtLiJ1Jj
• 0• :i -iii• iii
R- •i•••••i�- - ?•�•• ♦
•ii414.41411 •
41 Oi i 411 41 i •�•i•i•i�
ta 404
461\ 1*4
V>4
Case 88 -046 Tract D -1 of Tract A
Bells Flats Alaska Subd.
142 Sargent Creek Road
BI
R =1000'
Scale
100 200 300 400 900
0 1000
FEET +
MILES
0
4 •
•
•
E771
WATERSHED
ZONING KEY
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
RURAL
R °I
R -2
R -3
RESIDENTIAL
BUSINESS
INDUSTRIAL
CONSERVATION
PUBLIC USE LANDS